[0:11] hey
darren how are you doing welcome how are
[0:14] you
[0:25] all right we'll call our meeting to
order uh
[0:28] good evening everyone uh this is our
regular uh monthly meeting of january
[0:34] 28th
and just uh as a result of the state of
[0:38] emergency declared by the governor
of kentucky due to the global covenant
[0:42] 19
pandemic in accordance with recommended
[0:46] and mandated precautions
related there to the following meeting
[0:49] notice was issued
and this meeting is being hosted from
[0:53] our scott county courthouse
here at 101 east main street it's being
[0:58] broadcast live through the scott
physical court youtube page
[1:02] and due to the pandemic public
attendance will not be permitted
[1:06] at this meeting due to the contagious
nature of coven 19.
[1:12] public comments were
accepted prior and we had no public
[1:18] comments made
so with that said i would like to ask
[1:23] everyone to join me in the pledge of
allegiance
[1:28] and uh mr corman's going to lead us
today
[1:32] appreciate it will you join me
i pledge allegiance to the united states
[1:39] of america
and to the republic for which it stands
[1:43] one nation
under god indivisible with liberty and
[1:47] justice for all
i did give kelly a heads up
[1:54] so thank you all and appreciate it very
much
[1:57] uh would like to ask stacy hamilton
to call the
[2:04] [Music]
the role here mr wallace
[2:10] here mr corman present
mr ellison here mr burke
[2:20] he's
[Music]
[2:28] [Music]
and just make sure that the record
[2:32] reflects it mr burke is present
thank you next item in our agenda
[2:39] um are two separate uh
minutes from prior meetings 1-8 and 115.
[2:48] um are there any questions or comments
i believe we could approve these um
[2:56] together in one motion
[3:00] yes sir
motion for mr alvin lyons to approve
[3:08] we have a second from mr david
livingston
[3:12] any other questions or comments related
with that said all those in favor please
[3:20] say aye aye
any opposed motion passes minutes are
[3:25] approved
next in your packet or transfers
[3:31] any questions or comments related to
those transfers as presented
[3:36] i'll make a motion to prove a motion for
mr kelly corman to approve
[3:41] is there a second second a second from
mr chad wallace
[3:46] any comments questions i think i saw did
we transfer the money for the
[3:51] cameras got seven hundred thousand
how much was it one second
[4:06] [Laughter]
[4:10] [Music]
uh kelly which one can you specifically
[4:16] well just to order the cameras i know
we've made the transfer now
[4:22] i got my hand oh yes no no no no no
they they've not sent us an invoice yet
[4:29] um
and to my michelle yes
[4:34] uh i've not signed an invoice from them
i've sent them
[4:37] i sent them the money uh michelle can
you help us with that just the
[4:43] mechanics did you transfer that to yes
the money's been transferred in
[4:46] anticipation for the invoice to do
okay all right yeah
[4:52] and the plan is is that they're gonna do
they'll send us an invoice but then
[4:58] they'll schedule uh
some training and uh that all happened
[5:02] before
uh before we actually physically get the
[5:08] the equipment so
any other questions or comments
[5:18] now do we have a do we have a motion to
approve the transfers
[5:24] yes okay kelly made the motion do we
have a second
[5:27] second all right so we have a second
any other questions or comments all
[5:33] those are
uh in favor please say aye aye any
[5:37] opposed
motion passes transfers approved uh
[5:41] bills and hand checks
as presented any questions or comments
[5:47] related to those
[5:51] motion to approve for mr lyons is there
a second
[5:57] david livingston with the second any uh
questions or comments
[6:03] all those in favor please say aye aye
any opposed
[6:11] motion passes very good
[6:16] we're gonna go to number seven triport
road property
[6:21] i shared an email with the court this
afternoon
[6:25] a new visionary new vision
incorporated who had previously made a
[6:33] proposal
uh emailed and and withdrew their
[6:36] proposal
so that leaves us with uh
[6:41] one proposal that proposal was submitted
by toyota two show america
[6:48] rand has reviewed that proposal
ran past your muster
[6:55] and and and such that that proposal was
uh
[7:00] 48 thousand dollars all cash at closing
if you all remember when we did the
[7:06] original bid
the minimum was at 48 000 um
[7:12] so um what has been shared with me
is uh and i'm i'm glad
[7:19] uh toyota two show is gonna use this
parcel
[7:23] to improve the safety of their entrance
so you know they're a very good partner
[7:28] in our community employ a lot of people
so i'm pleased to report the
[7:34] proposal and would like to entertain any
questions or comments
[7:41] a motion from mr rick hostetler to
accept that proposal
[7:45] a second from dwayne ellison any other
questions or comments
[7:51] judge just a big sure uh we're on the
same page
[7:54] this would include giving the judge
authority to sign a contract
[7:58] with toyota 48 000
i think that would that's the only steps
[8:05] and then i i in conversation with toyota
two shows representative matt nunn today
[8:11] i told him after the consideration of
the court
[8:14] that we would reach out with how to
finalize the transaction i i was
[8:20] depending on you
for that so we'll we'll coordinate with
[8:24] him
but with that said
[8:30] um we've got a we got a
motion we've got a second and any other
[8:36] comments or questions
all those in favor please say aye aye
[8:42] any opposed
motion passes um
[8:47] next i'd like to ask mike kinnigan to
address the court
[8:52] uh in regards to agenda item 8 ema
surplus thank you mike sure
[8:58] uh tonight is the anniversary of the
going live with the radio program the
[9:05] big expenditure
so after one year on the new system
[9:11] we're ready to surplus and or junk the
old radio system city of georgetown
[9:19] is already disposed of all of the
competitors and
[9:23] basic infrastructure what we're asking
for you to approve
[9:27] is getting rid of the portable and
mobile radios
[9:32] that were on the former system
you should have gotten an email we have
[9:37] 103 handhelds
37 or 65 mobiles and 37
[9:43] battery chargers
[Music]
[9:47] i'm going to be back in two weeks to do
this again
[9:50] because the fire department found a
cache of radios in storage
[9:55] so they've got another 25 or 30 that we
have to inventory and be ready to
[10:00] release
there's also the question of the kenwood
[10:04] vhf system that
the fire department used and uh you know
[10:09] the road department was on
so there may be multiple radio systems
[10:14] ready to go
but basically you know yeah we have
[10:18] worked all the bugs out of the new
system i think everybody's satisfied
[10:22] that it's going to be fully functional
for what we need and there's no reason
[10:26] to keep the backups and emergency radios
that we're all holding on to
[10:31] in case something went completely
sideways or off the rails
[10:35] so mike are you just going are they just
going to junk them or do you all
[10:39] try to put them up the city of
georgetown had some success with putting
[10:43] them on the
government surplus website you know an
[10:46] auction site
gov deals i i think this one's called
[10:50] government surplus
dot com something uh wherever it was
[10:54] that they put them
we're going to recommend putting the
[10:57] same location
because you know there were people that
[11:00] were willing to buy them for five or ten
dollars a piece
[11:02] so if they're looking at that website we
might as well put the same equipment
[11:06] back up there
[11:09] let me say this like thank you for
attending to this i appreciate your
[11:15] effort
i mean it's something that needs to be
[11:18] done
[11:22] motion from mr hostetler question or a
second
[11:27] second from mr livingston any other
questions or comments
[11:33] all those in favor please say aye aye
any opposed
[11:37] motion passes thanks mike
uh ems new hires
[11:45] chris how are you jeff
[11:52] judge masters good evening um i'd like
to ask um
[11:58] tree guts to consider this evening um
some part-time
[12:02] personnel for georgetown scott county
ems i've got a list of seven names
[12:08] three of them are paramedics four emts
that's nikki sullivan christian whitman
[12:14] john stamper charles rollins christopher
burke
[12:18] jackson lyons and jordan oaks we're
asking to bring these folks on part time
[12:24] primarily to help with our overtime
budget with the pandemic we've had
[12:28] several people off we continue to have
people off so our numbers are
[12:31] are up there and then secondly you know
it's it's a benefit for us to bring
[12:35] these
folks on part time and get them kind of
[12:38] through our orientation process which is
about three months long and if we
[12:41] continue to have turnover in the future
we have folks that are ready to step
[12:44] right in and some of these folks have
expressed that
[12:47] interest to move on into full time when
those spots if they open up
[12:51] so when in jordan oaks when she
one time hired with us and she was a
[12:57] full-time paramedic
yeah and she left but she wants to come
[13:00] back part-time now yes
correct yeah she's a local any other
[13:05] questions or comments
uh this uh salary for our part-time
[13:09] medics is 14.25 that'd be their starting
salary and emt is 10 dollars and 30
[13:13] cents
an hour jeff you have any
[13:17] anything to add
[13:23] you know i appreciate the uh
effort to uh you know it doesn't put as
[13:30] much stress on our full-time
staff and then it also will help
[13:34] budgetarily as well so you know
the big thing is is not putting as much
[13:40] stress on our full-time staff
it is and it's been it's been taxing
[13:45] lately
a little bit yeah i appreciate your
[13:48] efforts thank you just a quick question
so you're at your full full staffing
[13:54] correct
yeah the last full time that you guys
[13:57] approved put us at full staffing and
we've been that way for a few weeks
[14:01] relief
[14:09] yeah and then there'll be a commitment
on their end too for a minimum hours per
[14:13] month usually that's about 24 hours
but they'll need to you know come but
[14:18] most likely they're going to say hey
chris here's the windows or the
[14:23] yeah and we use the software for our
scheduling so they can look months out
[14:26] in advance and see when those holes are
you know other than one sickly that pop
[14:31] up over fill in vacation
fill in that kind of stuff a big relief
[14:35] to our folks
our full-time folks motion for mr
[14:39] hostetler
second for mr ellison any other question
[14:42] or comment
all those in favor please say aye aye
[14:46] any opposed
motion passes thank you very much chris
[14:51] uh jiller bruls uh gel new hire
change good good evening
[14:58] good evening magistrates i would just
like to submit for y'all's consideration
[15:02] tonight
the name of tristan p lindsey
[15:06] uh for full-time hire he'll get hired in
at 15.50 an hour
[15:10] tristan has been with us part-time for
about
[15:13] probably four and a half months he's
done a really
[15:17] good job he does have prior corrections
experience
[15:20] and he completed the process
successfully to go from part-time to
[15:24] full-time with us
[15:29] we'll be fully we'll be fully staffed
once we get tristan
[15:32] on board you still have some part-timers
yeah not enough i was going to talk to
[15:39] mr mudrack about uh
opening it back up for part timers again
[15:44] probably tonight
talk to him and hopefully in the next
[15:46] couple of weeks get that opened up
very good any other questions or
[15:51] comments motion for mr lyons
second from mr ellison any other
[15:57] questions or comments
all those in favor please say aye aye
[16:01] any opposed
thank you motion passes um
[16:06] thank you very much i have a quick
question for the jailer i saw on the
[16:10] um the uh our vendor list that
we were paying money to woofer county
[16:16] detention center
are we housing inmates over woodford
[16:20] county
um i think that would be from
[16:25] a month or so ago i'm not aware of us
currently housing anybody over there we
[16:29] may have one over there but i would say
that's from
[16:32] maybe two months ago where we had an
outbreak and they helped us
[16:36] um house at that time okay off the top
of my head i don't know of any of our
[16:40] most our inmates are
in in our jail right now currently
[16:43] correct yeah we've got six
that are being housed outside of our
[16:47] facility
uh franklin county i know clark county
[16:50] and it's possible that woodford county
is one of those
[16:53] uh mr wallace but off the top of my head
i can't think of
[16:57] uh an inmate that's in woodford county
so that's
[17:00] that's possibly from a couple months
back but we're currently housing six
[17:04] outside of the county
yeah but you're 101 or something today
[17:07] right
yeah we're right at 100. yeah for your
[17:10] inmates yes sir
yep okay thank you
[17:15] yes sir thank you again
uh leads us to number 11 ordinance 21-01
[17:23] second reading
and rand has that draft
[17:28] that we had a first reading on
previously any questions
[17:32] or comments prior to rand reading that
draft
[17:39] scott vista court ordinance number 21-01
third amendment to an ordinance related
[17:43] to the establishment
general rules governing the appointment
[17:46] in terms of board commissions
perhaps the scott fiscal court approved
[17:50] ordinance number 99-10
on october 14 1999 establishing general
[17:55] rules governing the appointment in terms
of boards and commissions
[17:59] where asset ordinance was amended by the
scott physical court on july 23
[18:02] 2009 by ordinance number 09-04
and whereas there said ordnance was
[18:08] further amended by the scottish fiscal
court on december 9
[18:10] 2016 borders number 16-09
whereas it is not statutorily prohibited
[18:16] under kentucky law
to establish term limits for local air
[18:20] boards whereas the scott fiscal court
now desires to change the ordinance to
[18:23] amend term limits for local air boards
to no more than four consecutive
[18:28] full-term appointments
now therefore being enacted with the
[18:31] scott physical court
the ordinance number 99-10 as amended in
[18:36] ordinance
number 09-04 of the code of ordinances
[18:40] as further amended in order number 16-09
of the code of ordinances
[18:44] be further amended as follows and
nothing herein should be construed as
[18:48] amending or waiving
any other provisions of ordinance number
[18:51] 99-10 is amended
section 2 regulations e-1 except for
[18:56] statutory prohibited
except for local air boards when the
[19:00] full term of appointment to a board or
commission is four years
[19:04] there shall be no more than two
consecutive full-term appointments
[19:08] in the case of local air boards
specifically the georgetown scott county
[19:12] airport board
there shall be no more than four
[19:15] consecutive full-term appointments
subsection two except for statutorily
[19:20] prohibited except for local air boards
and the full term of appointment to a
[19:24] board or commission is three years
there shall be no more two consecutive
[19:29] full-term appointments
in the case of local air boards
[19:33] specifically the georgetown scott county
airport board
[19:36] there shall be no more than four
consecutive full-term appointments
[19:40] subsection three partial terms when a
member is appointed to fill a vacancy
[19:44] shall not be counted as a full term
section three effect
[19:47] effective date the third amendment to
ordinance number 99-10
[19:51] was previously amended shall become
effective upon its passage
[19:55] publication before going third amendment
was read for the first time
[19:59] january 15 2021 and for
the second time in the past assuming you
[20:04] do tonight january 28
2021 any other questions or
[20:10] comments i'd like to make a comment
i know the first time we brought this up
[20:15] i made the comment that i wasn't sure
that i was feel good about changing this
[20:20] just for one board
and i think just before we take the vote
[20:24] just explain my vote a little bit
because i've had to change the heart
[20:27] since we voted the first time
i think i'm gonna go back to my original
[20:30] thought which is i think the term limits
are good
[20:34] i'm not sure that there's one board
that's maybe
[20:38] tougher to be a board member on than
others
[20:42] so just i think that for me
i'm going to go back my original thought
[20:47] which were the term ones are good
that's my comment
[20:52] i would concur with mr corman
i will applaud the judge as far as
[20:58] opening up
for doing a better job of publicly
[21:02] advertising for boards because our down
our agenda we're going to see where
[21:07] there's plenty of interest in
parks board and i think the same could
[21:12] be achieved with this sport just to
make sure everybody understands there is
[21:18] still term limits
it's just max of four uh
[21:23] terms uh and uh i certainly uh respect
your
[21:28] respect your statement and understand uh
the concern and
[21:32] and i can't say that i don't
uh understand you know i understand
[21:39] those concerns 100
my thought was
[22:07] would you set it back to
[22:22] this sounds like a great reason to have
a local agreement
[22:31] i believe we can get that done soon uh
alvin yeah as
[22:39] can definitely come back and do this
again maybe rather than immediately
[22:43] let's go through another cycle where we
promote it like we did
[22:48] see if we if we can get more you know
i think
[22:58] [Music]
so we have a motion on the floor uh is
[23:04] there a second
a second from mr ellison any other
[23:08] questions or comments
mr rick hostetler well i wasn't here for
[23:12] the
discussion before and that's my fault
[23:15] but
as i thought it through i kind of i
[23:18] didn't really know that kelly checked
out that way but
[23:35] any other questions or comments all
those in favor please say aye
[23:41] any opposed
[23:44] the nays
[23:48] the nays were uh just for the record
where
[23:52] mr corman mr hostetler mr wallace
um with that said motion carries
[24:00] yes sir so you're voting yes judge
yes yes
[24:07] i'm sorry um to clarify i would be a yes
so with that said the motion does carry
[24:15] and uh
i do think that we can come back and
[24:19] address this
[24:23] jared would you take care of that please
text mr
[24:27] burke so with that said
back to number 12 board appointment
[24:34] parks and rec
[24:38] you know i can't take all the credit uh
kim rice
[24:42] helped produce the pdf for the
application
[24:46] and then our social media
uh intern helped us get it posted up and
[24:52] uh
you know we put that out and advertised
[24:57] that
opening and that opportunity and i think
[25:00] that's what we should be doing
and we had five individuals and you know
[25:05] looking at
at the response you know responses i
[25:08] think
all five are people that are worthy of
[25:11] consideration and would
would do a good job kim shared a little
[25:16] information of
her personal uh experiences with a
[25:20] couple candidates i
shared a little bit of information uh
[25:24] that i had
with a couple candidates are there any
[25:28] other questions or comments that anyone
would like to share
[25:31] yes sir i was wondering if those um
when those were sent to us were they
[25:37] sent in a particular order
i just i just copied and pasted
[25:42] sometimes like
the library award or somebody else no
[25:47] that was just the the fi that was the
total five that
[25:50] was received and um
i just you know i wanted to share all
[25:56] five with with the group and
open it up for discussion and and uh
[26:02] go from there i'm gonna call on dwayne
because dwayne
[26:06] if you don't know served on the parks
board before he became a magistrate
[26:10] and you know the makeup of the board
[26:14] and what i was looking at is the names
that i know most these people
[26:18] but i'm also looking at their experience
and maybe what their expertise level
[26:22] because
you want a board that's got a good mix
[26:24] of different perspectives
um is there any of these folks that you
[26:29] feel like could fill a gap
per se in in there and just so so that
[26:34] you know
well i'll let you say but you could tell
[26:37] who's on on the board and maybe
an area that we might need um the one
[26:42] person that kind of has a
i think unique skill set
[26:48] that's i think with the need that parks
and rec has right now would be ron
[26:53] flannery
[26:56] yeah i don't know every single person
personally on the computing list
[27:01] the two or three of them i know and
they're very very good and could be
[27:04] you know just as good of court members
anything
[27:08] but ron has a huge background in finance
and auditing and
[27:17] taking care of know does all kinds of
trainings across the state
[27:21] uh red book trainings especially uh he's
very active with
[27:24] athletics and multiple roles that i've
dealt with just to let you know what the
[27:28] red book is
the red book is the guide for
[27:33] um yes so
at school school he's trained a lot of
[27:38] people about
how to spend money how to do you know
[27:42] accounting how to do safeguarding
so that you don't have issues so i think
[27:47] he would be
somebody that the board could really
[27:49] lean on when it came to
you know especially the money side and
[27:55] then
you know he also has a really really
[27:57] strong background
david thank you for doing thank you
[28:03] duane i really like his background in
finance
[28:07] because i think that is a
very key area for someone to have a look
[28:13] at
um on that board you need somebody from
[28:18] different
paths of life and professions and
[28:21] expertise and
i think his would fit very well into
[28:26] being able to help the others understand
what's
[28:38] and those questions
[28:41] will help the conversation and help the
[28:53] the board has also people dale stove's
the chairman he's
[28:57] used to be a basketball coach gms
they've got a
[29:00] um a guy who's they had bait softball
eric flag baseball people
[29:07] so they're all great people they're all
yeah yeah but just having
[29:11] uh you know to cover the area i don't
think any of them have his skill set
[29:15] background so
it wouldn't be any other questions or
[29:22] comments
is there all like i shared with you all
[29:27] and like what kim said you know um
it's nice to have uh qualified people
[29:34] that want to give back to their
community and all five of the candidates
[29:40] definitely fit that bill and and
i appreciate their interest and will
[29:46] keep them
in mind for future a lot of them are
[29:49] already helping
and for what it's worth the city is
[29:54] going to consider a
they have an opening as well
[29:59] and they've received the same emails
that i did
[30:02] so
[30:06] any other question or comment about any
other candidate just a quick comment i
[30:09] i don't know i know one of the folks
and i know that's sharon flynn i know
[30:15] she has interacted with parks and rec
quite a bit and still still does with
[30:21] her
work at the extension office so
[30:26] i think she would be like that but
they're there
[30:30] they all got a lot of offers each
[30:39] and kim shared with you all her
experience with mr mickey mr mickey's
[30:43] an outstanding individual very respected
and such are all good uh i'm gonna make
[30:50] the motion that we would approve
ron flannery um to the parks and
[30:54] recreation board
we have one one motion from mr wallace
[31:00] is there a second second second from
kelly corner
[31:03] are there any other questions or
comments all those in favor please say
[31:07] aye
aye any opposed motion passes
[31:13] with that said i do have a
new business and uh just wanted to share
[31:19] an update
i shared this via email and uh we
[31:23] received
uh bids from five different architecture
[31:29] firms or or teams for the lyle road
soccer complex
[31:35] david livingston chad wallace myself
j.r brandenburg and tim tevis and
[31:41] kimberly rice
all reviewed those it's been suggested
[31:45] that
we call though the three of those
[31:50] in next week and just do a q a
not a full-on interview to try to get
[31:57] some clarification
and then i also there's one bid that we
[32:01] had some questions about
uh in uh gonna address some of those
[32:06] questions
with the the party and then report back
[32:10] to the committee
uh next week and then
[32:15] we have a work session scheduled for
next friday
[32:19] and i have invited the shepherd's house
to come and and
[32:26] give a update next friday during the
the work session
[32:34] and i would like if we could come to uh
if the committee could come to a
[32:39] recommendation to make to the court
i'd like to be able to bring this to the
[32:45] court and we could
possibly just make next friday a special
[32:48] called meeting
with a limited agenda there
[32:53] so that we might do that if the
committee can
[32:56] can come up and if there's any other new
business that
[32:59] the court wants i i don't have any other
new business
[33:05] i also had talked with general rules
about addressing the court
[33:12] here in february as well about
we had put into the budget and discussed
[33:19] a feasibility study about a detention
center
[33:23] and uh that was a dangerous and i've had
a comment and
[33:28] a conversation about just having a
discussion with the court about
[33:32] that study and next steps so uh that
might be on the uh
[33:38] that could be on the agenda for the
work session we could do it to what one
[33:43] of two ways we could simply have the
work session and then have
[33:46] a special call meeting for that one
agenda item
[33:51] and we can navigate that is there any
other new business
[33:54] before we go to number 14. um judge
one of the things that i brought this up
[33:58] i believe in december
is the uh committee that you're part of
[34:03] for the justice center moves forward
it is the we i think the court needs to
[34:09] really
need to figure out if we need to put our
[34:13] properties up for consideration
well and let me let me update everybody
[34:17] and i appreciate you bringing that up
because i actually
[34:20] intended to write that down
as a part of the discussion because you
[34:25] and i have talked about that a little
bit and
[34:27] rick and i have talked about a little
bit today at one o'clock
[34:30] our project development board had a
meeting and the project development
[34:38] board approved
a public hearing for february 18th
[34:45] and at the february 18th meeting
we will entertain and take public
[34:52] comment
or and any citizen can offer up
[34:57] their property as potential site or part
of the site
[35:01] i don't you know and i've shared this
and the court
[35:04] i mean the pdb has uh
has you know members of the pdb has
[35:09] expressed the same thing
that it's it's our hope that we can find
[35:14] a site downtown
so with that said i'm really glad you
[35:19] brought that up
i will advertise
[35:23] [Music]
no later than thursday in the paper
[35:27] the public notice for the hearing and
after that
[35:31] is publicly noticed then
then i can talk to anybody and anybody
[35:38] on the pdb
can talk to anybody about potential
[35:42] sites
so is that something that the court
[35:45] would want to discuss
next uh friday that's why i brought it
[35:51] up
yeah i think that's something that we
[35:53] need to discuss
[35:56] and we need to figure out if if that's
going to be an option or not
[35:59] obviously just because it's on the table
doesn't necessarily mean it's a
[36:04] you know finalized yeah 100 i think it's
something that we need to
[36:07] figure out if that's what we want to
move with before do you want to talk
[36:10] about
you know which property you're talking
[36:12] about right now yeah
and i i mean you probably know more than
[36:16] i do but i would assume
that it would be the coroner's office
[36:20] the sheriff's office
the parking lot that is adjacent to
[36:24] morales way
is only county properties that are on
[36:29] the east side
of north or hamilton street i guess
[36:33] that's south
north hamilton that would be the
[36:36] properties that we would have to put up
and i would
[36:39] i guess that's a city street morales way
it is
[36:42] so does this would the city have to
offer that up or
[36:46] if the pdb it first of all the
physical court voted to have that part
[36:51] of the consideration
then that would be shared with the pdb
[36:56] and then and then
the pdb would have to approach the city
[37:03] of georgetown about how to navigate
that question about about the street
[37:09] and they also own where the old center
of town was that property as well
[37:13] they did but i don't know
[37:18] but on that corner there's two parcels
other
[37:21] that are privately owned uh that the pdb
would have to
[37:26] you know discuss do we even know that
that footprint would hold
[37:30] what the requested
um so i've asked mike carroll
[37:37] who is the architect for the pdb uh
to essentially you know give me a um
[37:45] a footprint you know how big
the foot fro yeah and the other part of
[37:51] the consideration is
the requirement the program document
[37:55] requirements
include secured parking for
[38:00] judicial staff so that has to be part of
this
[38:04] footprint um so uh
david once i get that that's something
[38:10] that's public domain and i could share
with everybody
[38:14] how far exactly where are we
[38:20] okay so um we'll do the public notice
on the 18th and well i'm sorry we'll do
[38:27] the public notice then we'll have the
meeting on the 18th
[38:29] for site you know for site solicitation
and then on the 25th we'll have another
[38:36] meeting
that's our regular scheduled meeting and
[38:39] we're actually
going to uh we'll interview four
[38:43] different
companies that have made bid if they all
[38:49] if all four meet the aoc response
guidelines
[38:54] then we'll interview all four that met
the guy
[38:57] if they meet the guidelines we'll meet
for
[39:01] a construction manager so we'll we'll
interview
[39:05] construction managers on the 25th and
hopefully make a selection on the 25th
[39:11] architecture yeah we've selected brand
senator carroll
[39:16] now we now will do the cm
and uh then you know hopefully trying to
[39:24] start narrow down the site selection
[39:35] two and a half three year you know
it's a long process
[39:43] any other questions or comments so is
that something that the court wants to
[39:49] possibly have on an agenda for
discussion and consideration
[39:52] uh at next friday's if we
let's go on say i'd like to have us make
[39:58] that a special called meeting
is that something you all want on the
[40:02] agenda the only thing you know if we
don't have the footprint
[40:06] it kind of makes it tough
[40:18] like what i think chad's saying is
that we as a physical court
[40:24] consider offering that up as one if it
doesn't need it
[40:29] then it doesn't need it yeah or
the court says no we don't want to offer
[40:34] it up and then
at that point if they're looking at
[40:38] other options i guess
and just being 100 transparent with you
[40:43] all
and and who knows you know
[40:48] it's just uh in my mind it's just very
difficult to find a site downtown
[40:54] and to navigate the whole thing you know
the better the more options you have the
[41:00] better off you are
yes sir so the one thing we've got to be
[41:07] cognizant
of too is if you are going to offer up
[41:10] that property you better be prepared to
build a sheriff's department really fast
[41:15] yeah yeah that's a parallel well that's
why
[41:19] that's why i'm even bringing it out
today because i think that if the court
[41:22] decides they're going to go one
direction or another
[41:25] even if we need to start thinking in
those terms
[41:28] or not maybe not even potentially build
but
[41:31] other locations yeah to find a temporary
location or where
[41:35] it goes the meeting the public meeting
how's that going to be hosted is it
[41:40] going to be
virtually and we not do that like in a
[41:43] gym or something no the aoc
chief justice minton has
[41:50] like there can be no public meetings and
he give you an idea today during the
[41:56] zoom
the aoc regulations are that no two
[42:00] people
that are on the pdb can meet together
[42:05] on a zoom to zoom in you had to be
solo i'm just
[42:12] telling you so um but here here let me
let me share with everybody so
[42:19] the public comment there's two ways
people can participate
[42:23] if they want to participate they can
either submit
[42:27] a written comment and and that's one way
or they can request a zoom link
[42:34] we will give them a zoom link and then
they can
[42:38] join the zoom and then they can be
called upon
[42:42] and have a chance to address the pdb
in in a real time
[42:49] and i felt like that was the best way to
do it
[42:52] it's really our only way
[42:56] um yeah
so with that said any other new business
[43:02] or comments
just a comment
[43:09] over those same properties in that block
so to speak but then david's got a good
[43:14] point i
thought about that as well
[43:19] but you said this timeline is a couple
years
[43:22] out anyhow completion yeah completion
right
[43:27] which means we're probably going to
spend most of this year getting it all
[43:30] ready to go
i probably that's a guess on my part but
[43:34] a little education behind that but still
david brings up a good point
[43:38] so uh and then in the discussion if
we're going to discuss about
[43:43] that kind of things maybe it's
time to start a discussion not only that
[43:49] about
potentially for a sheriff's office a new
[43:52] coroner's spot if that's how it goes
also you know we all know that the jail
[43:57] is
uh still overcrowded even though a lot
[44:01] of folks have been moved out of them
out of the jail with all these coping
[44:05] things and the way they've done been
able to do that they're still
[44:08] would you say 100 or 101 uh
today and it's an 86 bed facility i
[44:13] think that's correct
so anyhow maybe we need to generate
[44:17] quite a bit of conversation
that can be done in the workshop well
[44:22] that in the conversation what i just
mentioned
[44:24] with jealous royals coming next you know
possibly coming next friday which we
[44:28] talked about
if we if we even want to consider that
[44:33] the feasibilities feasibility study has
to be done
[44:37] and that's the correct uh
process correctness rules yes sir yeah
[44:44] so feasibility studies the beginning of
the process
[44:48] so right and and that kind of just tells
us
[44:52] the information to make decisions so
i think that's what i'm talking about
[44:57] i'm not speaking today but i think he's
the same thing yeah we had put that in
[45:02] this year's budget some money and we
talked about it
[45:05] and it's time to probably talk about it
so with that said number 14 executive
[45:12] session krs-618101c and krs
61 8 10 1 f is there a motion
[45:20] to go into executive session motion from
mr livingston
[45:25] no we can do it together okay we have a
motion is there second
[45:35] potential appointment personnel second
second
[45:38] any other uh question or comment all
those in favor please say aye
[45:44] any opposed and unopposed we'll go in
bill have your cell phone and we'll call
[45:50] you on the cell phone
[46:36] executive session is there a motion to
come out of executive session
[46:40] motion from mr alvin lyons a second from
mr rick hostetler
[46:46] any questions or comments all those in
favor please say aye
[46:49] aye any opposed
motion passes for us to come out of
[46:55] executive session
from that executive session i'm going to
[46:59] ask mr rand marshall
to read a potential motion
[47:04] for action to be taken and then any
member of the court could
[47:09] make that motion and entertain a second
if it's our
[47:13] so if it's the will of the court
uh and the proposed motion is that the
[47:18] court authorized tom fitzgerald
to represent the county in a franklin
[47:24] circuit court action
filed by the energy environment cabinet
[47:29] against the county waste services of the
bluegrass
[47:32] opposing the extension and the operation
of the landfill
[47:36] and rather seeking the immediate closure
of the landfill
[47:42] who would like to make that motion rick
hostetler makes the motion
[47:46] is there a second i see a second for mr
livingston
[47:51] any other questions or comments
all those in favor please say aye
[47:57] any opposed motion carries and is passed
in the second manner uh discussed in the
[48:04] executive session
krs 61 810 in the matter of a possible
[48:09] appointment
no action was taken so let the record
[48:13] reflect that
with that said is there a motion to
[48:17] adjourn
motion from kelly corman bill
[48:22] burke with the first kelly corman with
the second
[48:26] all those in favor to adjourn please say
aye aye
[48:30] motion passes we are in adjournment
thank you
[48:59] you