[2:57] hi chad how are you good how are you um
[3:12] that's what i have to do don't worry
[3:14] i'll send it to you
[3:15] i like you sort of drawing oh thank you
[3:17] thank you now um tomorrow what time
[3:19] should we be here how about 8 45 good
[3:21] bye
[11:24] good
[11:31] [Music]
[12:24] for monday march 21st
[12:27] and the first committee is government
[12:29] operations mr charlotte okay so i'd like
[12:32] to call the government
[12:33] operations committee to order um we have
[12:36] four items on the agenda
[12:38] um
[12:39] a discussion around uh cannabis
[12:41] licensing zoning procurement policy uh
[12:45] ceremony resolution for zion lutheran
[12:48] church
[12:48] and a discussion around personnel um so
[12:54] first around kind of candidates licensed
[12:56] zoning i wanted to bring this back up to
[12:58] the council we
[13:00] spoke a little bit about this um
[13:02] and there was some conversation around
[13:04] this before i uh i actually joined the
[13:06] council but um as we're moving um in
[13:10] this direction i want to kind of
[13:12] open up the conversation to make sure
[13:14] that we are
[13:16] keeping in mind that we are trying to do
[13:18] this and within the spirit of the law
[13:21] that seems to uh
[13:23] clearly point out trying to you know
[13:25] write some wrongs and some historical
[13:28] lines around prohibition in
[13:30] marginalized communities and how they
[13:31] were disproportionately impacted
[13:33] by these laws and i wanted to just kind
[13:35] of have that conversation with the
[13:37] council and make sure i was uh getting
[13:39] your thoughts on on how we can do so
[13:48] and i would also if you don't mind i'd
[13:49] like mr um colin uh to speak to his
[13:52] drawing part of it yeah
[13:54] yeah mr coleman
[13:56] thank you uh good evening everyone
[13:58] um to begin um we're still waiting for
[14:01] regulations to come out from new york
[14:03] state related to
[14:04] um
[14:05] you know the parameters that the state's
[14:07] going to set up
[14:08] for lounges and dispensaries
[14:11] um i don't want to say we're in the dark
[14:13] when i think you know
[14:15] but we haven't seen even proposed
[14:17] regulations let alone finalized
[14:19] regulations
[14:21] um
[14:23] with zoning obviously you know
[14:26] there have been discussions that i've
[14:27] had with people in the development
[14:29] office
[14:31] generally i think
[14:32] we're of the mind that it's good to have
[14:34] the conversation but until
[14:36] the regulations come out so that we know
[14:38] what the state is going to require and
[14:40] whether or not
[14:43] you know we can go beyond what the state
[14:45] um may require
[14:47] um
[14:48] that's up in the air we don't know
[14:51] for example you know
[14:53] you know this i'm i'm speaking because i
[14:55] have really have no idea yeah it could
[14:57] be something related to like you know
[14:58] liquor stores where you have to have you
[15:00] know you have to be 500 feet apart for
[15:02] you know there are distance um
[15:04] requirements with liquor stores
[15:06] there's a chance that the state will do
[15:08] something very similar along those lines
[15:11] and the state may say and a city may be
[15:14] able to go beyond those restrictions we
[15:16] just don't know
[15:18] um
[15:19] you know i think obviously it's good to
[15:20] have the conversation to know to kind of
[15:23] keep it fresh but until really i think
[15:25] the state comes out with
[15:28] some type of
[15:29] you know
[15:30] regulations for us to review
[15:33] um
[15:34] it's very difficult to say what we can
[15:36] do and what we can't do
[15:40] there's not much more that i can really
[15:41] say on that i know you know as i said
[15:43] i've talked to the zoning officer about
[15:45] it we've
[15:46] you know um reviewed um you know things
[15:49] that may come up but we just as i said
[15:52] we don't know until we know
[15:56] i guess you know as we're out because
[15:58] we're gonna
[15:59] end up operating within certain
[16:01] parameters right so i just wanted to
[16:03] make sure you know i guess for the
[16:04] council outside of that piece was just
[16:06] like you know what you know as we start
[16:08] to think ahead of like you know what are
[16:10] you know some of the things that we can
[16:12] be uh you know
[16:15] making sure that we are in line with the
[16:17] spirit of this law because
[16:19] i i want to make sure that that's
[16:20] something that we're doing here that
[16:21] we're really honored you know um
[16:24] correcting you know some of the
[16:25] historical inequities that uh
[16:26] prohibition has
[16:28] uh impacted certain communities mr mayor
[16:32] can i correct i thought the
[16:35] state was going to put out first draft
[16:39] regulations so there would be a comment
[16:42] period so we would be able to
[16:44] get a general
[16:46] feel for
[16:47] the criteria that they were going to put
[16:49] into effect
[16:51] and
[16:53] kind of react
[16:55] from that you know should we endorse it
[16:57] 100 should we
[16:59] say no
[17:00] we don't want some of this and
[17:03] zoning is still largely
[17:06] the program of the local legislative
[17:08] body that you're going to have
[17:10] uh
[17:11] the final decision on that
[17:14] with the exception you know the state
[17:16] has taken some things
[17:18] such as group homes
[17:20] and
[17:21] gave them the designation as a
[17:24] thing this is a single family
[17:26] are one so that you can't
[17:29] and it's appropriate where you can't
[17:30] discriminate against them
[17:32] but
[17:33] at the same time where you have some of
[17:35] those
[17:36] homes that come in
[17:38] they create issues that
[17:40] are ancillary to their activity they're
[17:43] parking
[17:44] their traffic the things that uh
[17:47] people understand the goal of the
[17:49] organization as a whole but there's
[17:51] sometimes there are impacts that the
[17:53] state
[17:54] legislature or illinois may not have
[17:57] considered
[17:58] how do we look at these and be able to
[18:00] articulate a position that's going to be
[18:02] appropriate for schenectady and probably
[18:04] other communities across the state
[18:07] [Music]
[18:11] so we've opted in for the retail
[18:13] dispensary and the on-flight consumption
[18:16] right
[18:16] and then
[18:18] um
[18:19] then we have the other information here
[18:21] where it says that
[18:23] the governor has said that certain
[18:26] communities people certain people who
[18:27] are impacted negatively are going to be
[18:29] the first ones to get
[18:31] um
[18:32] um
[18:35] so
[18:36] i mean is that something that i mean how
[18:38] do we
[18:39] i know we can't make this decision today
[18:41] but i think we need to start having a
[18:42] conversation of how we even identify
[18:44] because people have already come forward
[18:45] who
[18:46] that doesn't that they're not in that
[18:47] category but there are people
[18:50] so people who are in that category how
[18:51] do we begin to identify or you know how
[18:54] do we do that um i know that people
[18:56] aren't going to get licenses until 2023
[18:59] but um
[19:00] it's gonna probably take a while to get
[19:01] through all of this so
[19:03] um i think that's one of the reasons why
[19:05] we're talking about it today just to
[19:07] begin to kind of put in place
[19:09] so that we're not there in 2023 trying
[19:11] to figure that out yes yeah and if it's
[19:14] i mean yeah please uh
[19:17] mr coleman pointed out
[19:20] the application process somewhat mirrors
[19:23] are similar to a liquor license
[19:25] you know we don't become aware of it
[19:28] until the process is well underway
[19:34] and i believe i read that the governor
[19:36] said there'd be the first 100 to 200 is
[19:38] that all new york state yes yes so
[19:40] that's what it is
[19:42] so i mean i guess we would just wait for
[19:44] people to fill out a license and if
[19:46] they're in our area that's how we would
[19:48] determine who was going to be able to i
[19:50] don't know and i don't think they've
[19:52] said how many
[19:54] licenses they're looking to give
[19:57] statewide
[19:59] is that 200
[20:02] most of them is it half of them is it
[20:07] still a lot of unknowns in the
[20:08] discussion
[20:11] i think they're
[20:12] unknown but
[20:13] um i thought that it was a first round
[20:15] of 100 licenses across the state and
[20:18] then the second round of 100 licenses
[20:20] across the state i thought
[20:21] but i think they're in a public comment
[20:23] period
[20:24] right now actually um
[20:27] in terms of those first hundred but
[20:29] i'm asking this question however
[20:32] even with those first and it is 100
[20:34] across the state so obviously i would
[20:36] think that they're going to be
[20:38] as the state awards the licenses they'll
[20:40] be looking at
[20:43] you know probably be skewed to different
[20:44] areas of the state as well so but we
[20:47] don't have the licenses right i mean
[20:48] it'll be a state estate thing so that's
[20:52] it's not it's not even in our control
[20:54] at that point who gets the licenses i
[20:57] think
[20:58] that's my assumption at this point
[21:00] yeah
[21:03] you know that doesn't mean that you know
[21:05] just because there are no there are
[21:07] unknowns we shouldn't think about you
[21:09] know this obviously you know the idea
[21:11] here is you know um any type of you know
[21:14] permitting process we do internally for
[21:16] the city whether that's a special use
[21:18] permit that the city council wanted to
[21:19] require for any dispensary or lounge or
[21:23] um anything related to
[21:25] you know the areas around the city in
[21:27] which
[21:28] the council may look to you know only
[21:31] allow
[21:32] dispensaries or
[21:35] lounges you know that's within your
[21:36] purview um it just can't be anything
[21:39] that's really unreasonable in terms of
[21:42] preventing somebody from actually or a
[21:44] company from actually operating within
[21:45] the city
[21:47] um but you know there may come a point
[21:49] in time where the council says you know
[21:50] we don't want to have
[21:52] you know i'm not speaking for you
[21:53] obviously this is hypothetical where you
[21:55] may say we don't want to have
[21:56] dispensaries or lounges in our one
[21:58] residential district
[22:00] obviously that's important to know um so
[22:03] we can take a look at the zoning code
[22:04] and
[22:05] um you know maybe better identify you
[22:08] know that's a gun up to you and as i
[22:10] said i've talked to the development
[22:11] staff about it you know
[22:14] again without the regulations it's
[22:16] really hard to say you know what can be
[22:17] done and what can't be done um but it's
[22:20] important i think to be mindful of
[22:22] when the regulations do come out you
[22:24] know where the council
[22:26] thinks that it would be best for lounges
[22:28] and dispensaries to be and then what we
[22:31] do internally with you know whether it's
[22:33] a special use permit or obviously you
[22:35] know somebody would probably still have
[22:37] to get site plan approval um but um
[22:40] there are things to think about um
[22:43] but with so many unknowns it's really
[22:44] hard to say how does the council move
[22:47] forward
[22:48] right yeah
[22:49] yeah just for clarity you know the
[22:51] conversation today isn't necessarily um
[22:53] you know how we you know how we move
[22:56] forward it you know for me what i really
[22:57] want to do is make sure that we are as
[23:00] because we do need to start thinking
[23:01] about it right right because we know
[23:03] that it's coming down the line so if
[23:04] we're doing that that we're doing that
[23:06] um you know in in alignment with you
[23:09] know uh
[23:11] the spirit of the law that that
[23:13] you know as it's been done so i just
[23:15] want to make sure that it's the lens
[23:16] we're looking through as we're
[23:18] um
[23:19] as we do as we're starting to think
[23:20] about it
[23:23] [Music]
[23:24] thanks uh so i definitely think it's
[23:26] important to actively remind the
[23:28] community that as these conversations
[23:30] continue to evolve as a council we're
[23:32] remaining in tune with the information
[23:34] that's coming out and then definitely um
[23:38] emphasizing what mr farley mentioned
[23:40] just understanding what the governor's
[23:42] intent is so absent or personal uh
[23:44] interpretations or opinions about the
[23:47] seating opportunity initiative it's just
[23:48] understanding that whatever is decided
[23:50] there's a little comment period as the
[23:52] mayor alluded to or that's what the
[23:54] expectation is
[23:56] but understanding that regardless of
[23:57] what comes out as a counselor and sure
[24:00] that we're promoting it to the
[24:02] betterment of the entire community so i
[24:04] think it's just
[24:05] we're aware of updates there have been
[24:07] no formalized legislation coming forward
[24:10] everyone just be patient
[24:13] that's it
[24:16] as i was looking up some things at the
[24:18] office of canada's mismanagement after
[24:20] this was on the agenda i noticed that
[24:22] there was something that they did called
[24:24] community conversations
[24:26] where they went around and talked to
[24:27] people i wasn't aware of that so um you
[24:30] can go back and it's on the website you
[24:32] can go back and hit the link and
[24:33] actually um go look at it i haven't had
[24:35] a chance to do that yet but so i it'll
[24:37] be interesting for us i think to maybe
[24:39] take a look and see
[24:40] what these community conversations were
[24:41] about
[24:42] [Music]
[24:44] so it's in english in spanish for those
[24:45] who are listening and may want to go
[24:47] back in
[24:48] i don't have the um
[24:50] the link here but it's on the cannabis
[24:52] website
[24:55] any further discussion on that
[24:58] okay
[25:00] so we'll move into our procurement
[25:02] policy
[25:04] portfolio
[25:08] thank you
[25:09] a few weeks ago we discussed
[25:12] new procurement policy for year 2022 to
[25:15] 2023
[25:17] and we held this back because mrs
[25:19] porterfield had wanted us to
[25:22] recommend that we insert the mwb
[25:25] language into the policy rather than
[25:26] having a footnote
[25:28] so
[25:29] we did that
[25:30] and this was a version that
[25:32] is with us here for us to review
[25:35] and come up with any additional
[25:37] recommendation that we may have
[25:40] [Music]
[25:43] if i may ask um
[25:45] mr gardner just give us a brief update
[25:48] if you don't mind sure sure
[25:50] mr gardner you just want to give us a
[25:52] brief update on these uh added
[25:54] changes the benefits of doing these
[26:00] all right good afternoon
[26:02] thank you um
[26:03] so so basically
[26:05] what what is the quote for you is taking
[26:08] the language that's already been
[26:09] approved in the uh mwde
[26:12] policy
[26:14] and adding into the uh practicing policy
[26:18] you know every language as opposed to
[26:19] football because it's already there but
[26:22] fellow in going
[26:23] we there's
[26:26] back and forth
[26:29] basically
[26:30] unless we have any specific questions
[26:37] i noticed a question that i think i'm
[26:39] not sure if it was from mr colton it
[26:40] says a.k.a um i was
[26:43] uncertain about that too i don't know if
[26:45] that got
[26:46] worked out
[26:47] do you want to say it or do you want me
[26:48] to i don't have any i mean that's the
[26:50] question that i raised i didn't i don't
[26:51] have an answer um so
[26:54] it um i'll just read it says um
[26:57] are the goals for
[26:59] each mbes and wpes 15 as indicated on
[27:03] the first paragraph for public works
[27:05] projects more than 100k
[27:07] or are the goals for each of those 12
[27:10] and 8
[27:11] and i did notice as i read through that
[27:13] it is in it is it says 12 and 8 in some
[27:17] different things okay so i was a little
[27:19] confused also the workforce goes deal
[27:21] specifically with the workforce so
[27:23] that's the hourly
[27:25] person working on the job site so so
[27:27] that's the eeo component
[27:29] and then the mwbe contract compliance
[27:32] piece gives us a
[27:33] okay
[27:34] okay so numbers of people on the site
[27:37] work at the workforce in the workforce
[27:39] and
[27:40] then the other part is just for like the
[27:43] contractors
[27:46] [Music]
[27:51] i guess we'll have one more the only
[27:53] other thing is that i did notice that
[27:54] the
[27:55] ceiling went from 250 000 to 300 000 for
[27:58] the apprenticeship
[28:00] programs i know we had talked about that
[28:02] quite a bit
[28:03] last year i just did couldn't you
[28:04] comment on that yeah and and again that
[28:06] was the um suggestion you know was to
[28:09] come back and discuss it was talk about
[28:11] you know bringing it you know and
[28:13] phasing that in and that's all that was
[28:15] what's basically probably 250 up to 300
[28:18] 000 again
[28:20] the mindset is to create opportunities
[28:22] for
[28:23] you know the smaller firms that not
[28:25] necessarily have
[28:26] you know access to these friendships
[28:42] more local small business owners
[28:44] one of the questions i think that was
[28:45] raised at the last time that we talked
[28:47] about this a few weeks ago was to what
[28:50] extent we've had success
[28:53] um with local
[28:56] contractors being able to to do this
[28:58] based on these changes that we had made
[29:00] last time okay so so it's a long term
[29:03] process you know it's a commitment and
[29:06] um you know we've had success uh we're
[29:08] getting you know more and more firms uh
[29:11] know
[29:12] coming in line consistency in terms of
[29:14] what the state requirements are
[29:16] and so we're working that and it's a
[29:18] much more strenuous process
[29:21] in other words
[29:22] you know to get certified and all that
[29:24] there's
[29:29] and
[29:30] you know we've gotten more companies
[29:32] certified
[29:33] you know as a result of this and then
[29:35] you know more opportunities
[29:37] you know coming forward and ultimately
[29:39] you know i won't be able to say in you
[29:41] know two years from now or five years
[29:43] from the conception
[29:44] that we create more prime contractors
[29:46] that's you know in this thing that
[29:49] people you know compete and have
[29:51] capacity to perform and execute on these
[29:53] jobs
[29:54] which also means that we would have more
[29:56] opportunity for
[29:58] the workforce and our constituents so
[30:00] again we have to do two things one you
[30:02] got to bring the capacity of other
[30:04] companies to compete
[30:05] and you know being the thing which is
[30:07] all about good business but also we have
[30:09] to train and develop the workforce to
[30:11] support
[30:12] you know these companies so that's why
[30:14] you can't do one without another you
[30:16] know so you can't necessarily have a
[30:18] training program
[30:20] and you don't have companies capable of
[30:22] taking longer to do that so you have to
[30:24] bring up the workforce to support you
[30:26] know these companies that
[30:28] you know that comes along and
[30:30] there's a lot more to it than just
[30:32] the labor on the work you know and
[30:34] having the children person you know
[30:35] these companies they need
[30:36] back office support for them and they
[30:39] have trouble
[30:40] getting the paperwork in and processing
[30:42] really which is why they know their pay
[30:44] which is
[30:45] adds to the cash flow issue so so it's
[30:48] evolving process
[30:50] that they have to
[30:52] you know do and
[30:54] you know we are making that way and
[30:56] you know a lot of success and we have to
[30:59] continue but it's not easy by no means
[31:01] you know it's
[31:05] well i appreciate the work that you do
[31:08] to help folks get
[31:09] certified and
[31:11] recruit a larger workforce so thank you
[31:16] yes i would also like to thank you for
[31:18] your input in this
[31:20] this pickerman policy to get all
[31:22] information to us and also working on
[31:24] the nwp the updated mwb version for the
[31:27] next two years so once again thank you
[31:29] for all the
[31:31] good hard
[31:31] you thank you so appreciate it
[31:35] so i i raised this question so mr um
[31:38] should we
[31:39] uh we're number 10 which was going to be
[31:41] that footnote should we now if we're
[31:42] going to be moving forward just delete
[31:43] that from this document sorry listen
[31:46] i'll go back for a second i was looking
[31:47] at this
[31:49] um
[31:50] that was the question in my email but
[31:52] i left it in there and i just added for
[31:53] additional information because obviously
[31:56] you know there's additional information
[31:58] in the um equal opportunity and
[32:01] affirmative action plan okay it's a good
[32:03] reference for people to go to it's great
[32:05] that you know we've now included the
[32:06] utilization in here but kind of fills in
[32:09] some gaps for people to go to the other
[32:11] document knowing that there's another
[32:12] document
[32:13] okay we just have to put it because i
[32:14] didn't see i didn't see
[32:16] on the place where the footnote where
[32:18] the this 10 was so we have to find the
[32:20] place
[32:21] it's uh
[32:22] under number four it says for
[32:24] mwbe utilization and then footnote 10 is
[32:27] there with it all right
[32:29] okay
[32:30] thank you
[32:33] okay no i'm good
[32:35] with this okay
[32:37] okay
[32:39] pretty much
[32:59] [Music]
[33:07] it's the 150th anniversary for zion
[33:10] lutheran church it's just a resolution
[33:12] to recognizing for
[33:14] their anniversary
[33:18] second
[33:20] all those in favor
[33:24] okay
[33:25] and
[33:26] now we're going to move on to a
[33:28] discussion
[33:30] around personnel
[33:31] um so this is something if it really
[33:33] needs to be an executive session so i
[33:35] would like to have it there okay so i
[33:38] would like to uh recess no the mayor um
[33:41] wanted to add something oh okay okay
[33:44] afterwards okay so um uh
[33:46] so what we'll do is we'll go on to um
[33:49] the mayor wanted to add something here
[33:51] and then we'll
[33:52] go into that discussion so mr mayor
[33:55] talked to council member uh
[33:58] council president porterfield
[34:00] a little while ago got a request from
[34:03] the u.s conference of mares
[34:06] to
[34:07] uh
[34:11] pass it around
[34:13] there i thought
[34:14] two weeks ago that had been resolved
[34:17] but they're still
[34:19] a
[34:20] discussion in congress
[34:22] to limit or take back the money that has
[34:25] been allocated for local governments
[34:30] to fund some of the
[34:34] issues that are arising from the
[34:35] activity
[34:37] in the ukraine
[34:38] and
[34:39] some of the deficits that
[34:41] are
[34:42] funding
[34:44] necessities that are
[34:46] coming so from media
[34:49] and what i was looking for from that
[34:51] memo is to have the council consider
[34:54] passing the resolution
[34:56] saying that we
[34:57] appreciate the work that went into
[35:00] getting money for local governments
[35:03] we're going through the process now to
[35:06] spend it we've identified some projects
[35:08] in
[35:09] holland central park going through the
[35:10] review with community now and
[35:13] again looking forward to
[35:16] other things as we deal with it next
[35:18] year
[35:19] and
[35:20] i always appreciate the good work of
[35:24] people in congress sometimes it happens
[35:27] where i don't quite understand the logic
[35:29] and uh would uh ask for the council's
[35:32] consideration to go on record saying
[35:34] that
[35:35] we can thank them for the money that
[35:38] we've got and
[35:39] we need that money and
[35:42] don't want them to undertake something
[35:44] that would claw it back or modify
[35:47] what we have
[35:50] coming to us
[35:51] today
[35:55] i would absolutely 100 support that
[35:58] you know that you know we got the money
[36:00] we're anticipating spending the money so
[36:01] i think that it's definitely something
[36:03] that we should do
[36:06] so
[36:09] i agree
[36:20] [Music]
[36:24] so at this point um
[36:28] this is a traffic tool that's an outline
[36:32] again okay
[36:33] okay so i want you to recess
[36:36] okay all those in favor
[36:42] [Music]
[36:55] [Music]
[37:04] 2022 capital projects which you had
[37:07] already really improved in uh the budget
[37:09] process uh
[37:11] in november of the past year uh
[37:14] and as you know uh what we're in the
[37:16] process right now is to actually go out
[37:18] and borrow the money so we're just
[37:19] getting an approval uh with this bond
[37:22] awareness to go out and borrow the money
[37:24] um as you know uh the total capital
[37:26] prices came over 12 million dollars but
[37:29] we we're looking to just borrow uh
[37:32] 6.9 million uh the other difference is
[37:34] the cost of issuance costs of 93 000 uh
[37:38] we're going to be banning this ban as a
[37:41] bonding station though uh usually for
[37:44] one year and we'll probably bond it next
[37:46] year as as long as the interest rates
[37:48] are favorable which they are right now
[37:52] um have any questions yeah
[37:54] yeah so mr ferrari mr mayor
[37:58] how many of these items are associated
[38:00] with
[38:02] no
[38:12] any questions yeah just about you said
[38:15] it was 93 000 that was a cost of
[38:17] insurance no issues
[38:20] that's right i had a question i think
[38:22] earlier today about the vehicle
[38:24] um uh i'm going to break it down uh the
[38:27] fire department they're going to have
[38:28] four command vehicles uh the last time
[38:30] they got a vehicle was four years ago
[38:32] most of their vehicles are over 15 years
[38:34] old
[38:35] and they're asked asking for four new
[38:38] ones because 15 year 15 years old is the
[38:41] newest of the last four ones so that's
[38:44] why they're getting that the police are
[38:46] getting a total of 16 of 12 uh mark cars
[38:50] for unmarked
[38:51] uh you got to remember uh
[38:53] they just received the new cards for
[38:55] 2021
[38:56] but we never got the cars in 2020 so
[38:59] they're replacing cars with huge amount
[39:02] of mileages so so we're actually we're
[39:04] looking for this actually probably won't
[39:06] get it for another nine months to a year
[39:08] so
[39:09] those police cars
[39:11] how many did we get just before i know
[39:12] that we're getting 16 now we'll get 69
[39:15] last year we got 12 all together eight
[39:16] and four
[39:18] uh the streets uh the streets uh
[39:20] department we're going to get two dump
[39:22] two dump trucks with plows the plot of
[39:24] streets and two new pickup trucks again
[39:27] those pickup trucks are uh over uh 12
[39:30] years old the ones that we're replacing
[39:33] the waste department we have four new uh
[39:35] garbage trucks
[39:36] and two pickups for the supervisors too
[39:39] and if you've seen the supervisors
[39:40] trucks you know that they need new
[39:42] trucks those guys those are also over 15
[39:45] years old
[39:46] uh the snap snap crew we're gonna snap
[39:49] and uh uh
[39:52] let me call it
[39:54] nuisance guys yeah there you go it's
[39:55] gonna be a total of three uh
[39:58] uh and that's you know one first staff
[40:00] and the two for the new nuisance guys uh
[40:02] we're
[40:03] with the mayor's uh uh uh reasoning
[40:06] anything that we use for vehicles we're
[40:07] gonna try to get all electric so trying
[40:09] to move in the electric uh
[40:11] in the electric uh realm of things
[40:14] and uh sooner you think we'll be buying
[40:16] uh electric uh pickups pretty soon as we
[40:19] hear this coming
[40:21] uh
[40:22] yeah
[40:24] how many sweepers are we gonna have
[40:25] we're gonna have one new sweeper in fact
[40:27] uh we as you remember uh i think about
[40:29] uh two months ago jay where we asked to
[40:33] order it so it's in the order now and
[40:35] that one sweeper is it still not done
[40:37] yet so we're hoping to get it before the
[40:39] end of the year hopefully get it for
[40:41] linda's sentence
[40:42] two of the streams
[40:44] one
[40:48] we're gonna have a total we're gonna
[40:49] have a total of four retirement
[40:59] any other questions
[41:02] mr would you have any other questions no
[41:04] no okay thank you thank you very much
[41:06] i'll be back
[41:10] you may have a motion on this
[41:13] second all in favor
[41:15] aye
[41:18] the next item is purchasing microphones
[41:21] for city council with sport appeal yes
[41:24] um we've been discussing this for a
[41:25] while um you know mr family brought up
[41:28] like back i think back in november just
[41:29] the whole
[41:30] um
[41:33] not good quality of uh our um our
[41:36] broadcast
[41:37] and um i know that it's going to be a
[41:39] longer process however
[41:40] uh if you notice i mean i know you all
[41:43] know this now
[41:44] we're down to one microphone period in
[41:47] the chambers and that's being shared by
[41:49] the public as well as by the council
[41:51] and
[41:52] our last meeting it just reminded me of
[41:55] a
[41:56] episode of parks and rec if you've ever
[41:58] seen it so
[42:00] i really really think that we need um
[42:03] and highly recommend that we buy at
[42:04] least two microphones so that the
[42:06] council is not sharing the microphone
[42:09] because it looks like it's going to be a
[42:10] longer process for us to um get all the
[42:14] contracts and all the other things that
[42:16] the mayor was talking about um i did
[42:19] read an email
[42:20] um where i know that there were there
[42:22] was a request for having um these
[42:24] gooseneck mics but then there was the
[42:26] whole thing about running cords which
[42:29] again is a longer process so i think at
[42:31] this point in time we need to do
[42:32] something in the short term and just
[42:34] have microphones so that the council has
[42:36] a couple microphones to use
[42:38] it's just getting more and more
[42:40] challenging
[42:42] during our meetings
[42:44] absolutely i have to agree with that
[42:46] that we need to get new microphones and
[42:49] let's work out the detail and getting
[42:51] the other stuff fixed
[42:55] yeah so um it's looked into this they
[42:58] looked into whether or not the
[43:00] goosenecks
[43:01] would be
[43:02] financially
[43:04] cost effective they are not
[43:06] um
[43:07] that was the idea
[43:08] the wiring process really isn't a big
[43:10] deal
[43:11] according to it
[43:15] but the cost is just
[43:17] well over what two wireless microphones
[43:19] would be i thought maybe since they were
[43:22] wired it might be about the same cost
[43:25] but it's not so the two wireless are
[43:28] slightly less than five hundred dollars
[43:32] any other comments
[43:34] [Music]
[43:36] you may have a motion to proceed to
[43:37] purchase a new microphone from moving
[43:41] all in favor all right
[43:44] the next item is amendments to the 2022
[43:48] 2020
[43:51] annual action plan to include a
[43:53] reallocation of 250 000 from snap and
[43:56] street paving to park improvement
[43:59] good evening and happy spring
[44:01] um this is just in relation to the
[44:03] public comment period we just had for
[44:05] the reallocation of 250 000
[44:08] um from the street painting and snack
[44:10] programs to park improvements this has
[44:12] to do with ongoing park projects that we
[44:14] have
[44:15] um and the need to kind of spend down
[44:17] the money that was on spend for prior
[44:19] years
[44:20] um so just looking for the council to
[44:22] approve this amendment and the
[44:23] reallocation of the funding
[44:26] [Music]
[44:27] that is 2021 2022
[44:31] yes okay
[44:32] oh so that that's a that's a typo on our
[44:35] agenda
[44:37] okay
[44:38] questions
[44:40] go ahead please uh so i know at least
[44:42] for me being a new council member
[44:44] whenever i hear anyone recount
[44:45] reallocating money from the street
[44:47] paving and smacking like what
[44:52] um but i didn't know if you were able to
[44:55] or
[44:56] chris i was able to come and speak to
[44:57] just a proportionality of what this
[45:00] amount of a hundred thousand dollars
[45:02] being
[45:04] is in comparison to the entire budget i
[45:06] think just to reassure people that
[45:08] this is not something that's being made
[45:10] at the expense of the entire paving sure
[45:13] uh our paving budget is is well right
[45:16] now so right now we usually get around
[45:18] 1.5 million dollars of chips money which
[45:21] is state highway consolidated roads
[45:23] money
[45:24] in addition to that the new york state
[45:25] budget has allocated an additional 1.2
[45:28] million dollars to the city for the last
[45:30] year i believe it's going to be a
[45:32] three-year program which is additional
[45:34] chips for state routes but we can use it
[45:35] for other roads um on top of that in the
[45:38] capital budget which you are just moving
[45:40] forward we also have i believe it's a
[45:41] million and a half dollars for roadways
[45:44] and there um so the paving program uh
[45:48] has the money to pave the roads one of
[45:50] the things that we cannot use this money
[45:51] for just to be clear is that this is for
[45:53] contractor work with roadways for
[45:55] long-term work it can't be used for
[45:58] potholes
[45:59] so potholes is considered maintenance
[46:02] and maintenance is not eligible for
[46:04] expenses under this money so that is
[46:07] where we have our operating budgets and
[46:09] in that kind of money but as far as i'm
[46:11] concerned we are fine for prepaying
[46:13] roads we actually have two contracts
[46:16] starting this year again and we have a
[46:18] third going out in april
[46:20] all of them essentially multi-million
[46:22] dollar programs
[46:25] and i guess
[46:27] we're doing as much work as staff also
[46:29] would allow you know like we are pushing
[46:31] the work out and getting it done so i
[46:33] don't think that we're doing any
[46:34] disservice to the citizens connecting by
[46:37] by reallocating this money i mean this
[46:38] is development block grant money this is
[46:40] money that we do try to use but now that
[46:42] we're getting increases in other areas
[46:44] i'm perfectly comfortable doing it
[46:47] thank you
[46:49] any other comments
[46:53] may have a motion
[46:55] [Music]
[47:04] health care and national fitness
[47:06] champion
[47:09] is um mr city applied for a grant for
[47:11] the 2022 mvp healthcare campaign um this
[47:15] is going to be allocated um toward the
[47:17] purchase of an outdoor fitness port that
[47:19] will go into orbit park as part of the
[47:21] recent involvement there
[47:23] so this is just to accept the fifty
[47:26] thousand dollar grant from mvp for the
[47:28] fitness court um to be installed at what
[47:30] you want
[47:32] any comments
[47:34] we have a motion
[47:37] second all in favor uh
[47:39] the next item is authorized the
[47:41] allocation of 90 000 cdbg funds
[47:44] for the national fitness campaign
[47:46] outdoor fitness board misty so related
[47:49] to um
[47:50] related to the fitness court request
[47:52] this would be
[47:54] um
[47:55] this would be
[47:56] the authorization of the ninety thousand
[47:58] dollars to meet the local funders
[48:00] funding requirements for the um for the
[48:02] fitness court and orchard charts so
[48:05] it's basically just
[48:07] yeah it's the funding that the city will
[48:09] be contributing towards the fitness
[48:10] course
[48:12] any questions
[48:14] go ahead and support you so the 90 000
[48:16] is coming out of the 250 000 that we
[48:18] just yes
[48:21] yep okay and then the balance of that
[48:24] of the 250.
[48:27] the balance yes the 250 we're using what
[48:30] is the bet so 90 000 is going to go to
[48:32] this project
[48:33] so do we um do we have a
[48:36] have we decided where the other uh the
[48:38] balance of that's going to be allocated
[48:39] at this time
[48:41] yeah so some of the right now
[48:44] this is that 50 000 for the equipment
[48:49] then there's going to be installation
[48:50] costs that are associated with it which
[48:52] we're procuring through the policy um
[48:56] we're not going to put this thing
[48:57] together it's extremely intricate to put
[49:00] this together so that's anticipated
[49:02] uh to come out of there and we're
[49:04] working it has to be we have to get
[49:05] three prices for our policy because it's
[49:08] going to be over 3500 we're anticipating
[49:10] it's going to be less than 35 000 so
[49:13] depending on the ranges we're either
[49:14] going to get verbal or written quotes so
[49:16] that's going to come out of there and
[49:17] then there is also a pad that goes with
[49:20] it because these things are going to be
[49:21] mounted to a pad so that also is going
[49:24] to be in there which we're also looking
[49:26] at either doing pricing for
[49:28] our policy so both of those costs um we
[49:32] don't need your explicit authorization
[49:34] because through the purchasing policy
[49:35] will be less than a bit amount but those
[49:37] will come out of there and then the
[49:38] balance of it is remaining for parks
[49:40] particularly if we're looking at jerry
[49:41] burell yes and that will be going to the
[49:43] dairy rail park so once the project is
[49:46] moved forward we have more concrete cost
[49:48] items we can give you an update of what
[49:50] the split would be okay but those are
[49:52] our anticipated costs right now this is
[49:54] because the grant the equipment we have
[49:56] kind of set up and the rest of the cost
[49:58] we're anticipating we're not going to
[49:59] have to bid anything
[50:00] um which is going to help us because
[50:02] that's going to also save us time
[50:03] because they know that we really want to
[50:05] get this in for the late summer or i
[50:07] mean late spring early summer
[50:09] push this so we can use it um but that's
[50:12] where we are right now so the balance
[50:14] that they go over the next part is kind
[50:15] of unknown okay so
[50:17] thank you
[50:18] of course
[50:20] yes
[50:21] let's go ahead okay please
[50:27] is this the remainder of this money
[50:29] you're thinking jerry grove
[50:31] we're thinking about that for the likes
[50:33] that we were talking about a couple of
[50:34] weeks ago and we were talking about some
[50:36] hardware money uh
[50:38] possibly exactly
[50:43] funding for the park we are the design
[50:45] is in process so we have kind of an
[50:48] estimate but until we put the bid out
[50:50] we're not going to be we're not going to
[50:51] know what the total is going to be um we
[50:53] know there's a gap you know i i will say
[50:56] i mean this is like any project that
[50:57] you're going to hear from myself or
[50:58] chris has been before anyone is that we
[51:00] could always use more funds for our
[51:03] parks so
[51:04] the allocation of this money i would not
[51:06] say would preclude us from pulling that
[51:09] because we are going to have to add
[51:10] alternatives we're going to be looking
[51:11] to do more looking at you know there's
[51:13] the base and then we're going to put in
[51:15] for what we're looking at with that
[51:17] alternative design either the tennis
[51:18] courts or the basketball courts or some
[51:20] other things and yes this could be used
[51:23] towards the lighting but that may
[51:24] prevent us doing one of those other
[51:26] features so that's where you know as
[51:28] much funding as we can as we can get
[51:30] towards the project we would like to do
[51:32] so that we can put it as much into the
[51:34] park you know i always say to people
[51:36] that this is public money this is not
[51:37] going to build me fool you know you're
[51:39] not going to come to my house and see
[51:40] anything in my backyard it's all going
[51:41] to the public into there so anything
[51:43] that we can give
[51:44] you know that would be great you know so
[51:46] i would like to hope that it gets
[51:47] reviewed on its own merits yeah and that
[51:49] if it does then that's great and then to
[51:51] maybe get a little bit more
[51:53] yeah
[51:54] go ahead mr man
[51:55] and again just find out mr wallen said
[51:57] that the
[51:59] design work and jerry work morale park
[52:02] is what i'll call the park proper
[52:05] as i look at it those basketball courts
[52:07] as you go farther along hamilton street
[52:09] in
[52:10] across the street there
[52:12] it's foolish to
[52:15] fix
[52:17] this whole area up here and then leave
[52:18] this
[52:20] it's kind of a dilapidated embarrassed
[52:23] section across the street
[52:25] so as they're doing the work up
[52:28] and then look at the whole thing
[52:31] and
[52:32] there's not going to be quite enough
[52:34] money
[52:36] on the table to do
[52:38] everything right now
[52:40] but i believe as we come through and get
[52:43] some firmer numbers on what we're going
[52:44] to actually have to come up with whether
[52:47] it's arpa rearranging other things
[52:50] to make sure that we've got a project
[52:52] there that
[52:53] does everything we want and that we're
[52:56] all going to be
[52:57] proud of it and the neighbors are going
[52:59] to be appreciative of it
[53:01] and
[53:02] thank you for your consideration on the
[53:04] orchard street park uh follow-up to uh
[53:07] councilmember uh william's suggestion of
[53:09] moving the council meetings around
[53:11] maybe that we could have one at this
[53:14] place and all the council could work out
[53:18] just as a ribbon-cutting myself
[53:28] any other questions
[53:30] so the remaining is 160 000 i'm sure
[53:32] you're going to come back to the console
[53:34] for allocation for the 160 remaining the
[53:37] balance of the 160. oh would we allocate
[53:39] that yeah sure okay i mean the
[53:42] application yeah but that's what i'm
[53:44] getting here but it's going to be
[53:46] you might not notice that we're doing it
[53:48] so we'll put it up because if we you
[53:50] know like when i bring you a paying
[53:51] program i don't i don't explicitly
[53:54] detail the funding of the paving program
[53:56] there may be multiple foreign sources a
[53:58] lot of times the word we use is a
[53:59] funding quilt sometimes when i bring
[54:01] things such as psat i bring that here
[54:04] you know there is federal there's local
[54:06] there's metroplex most of the time they
[54:08] don't get into that detail but if you
[54:10] would like to sort of detail if we can
[54:12] yeah if you don't mind just let us know
[54:13] how the allocation is going with regards
[54:15] to the remaining 160 would appreciate it
[54:18] any other questions regarding this item
[54:21] may have a motion
[54:24] [Music]
[54:37] development plan
[54:39] there's 13 items on the agenda and the
[54:42] first item of secret determination for
[54:44] barrett street and south avenue yeah
[54:47] so this is relation to you know what was
[54:50] on the agenda two weeks ago there was
[54:52] some questions about the planning
[54:53] commission meeting and the minutes for
[54:55] that um i did provide those minutes um
[54:58] you know we didn't see
[55:00] as much there wasn't much opposition to
[55:02] the project it was more
[55:04] questions sort of
[55:05] you know reservations about what does
[55:07] this mean you know for the neighborhood
[55:09] and
[55:10] you know so hopefully you've had a
[55:11] chance to look through that but um
[55:14] is there any questions about that
[55:20] any questions anymore yeah
[55:23] all right then that takes up
[55:25] motion
[55:26] so
[55:28] this this first one would be for the
[55:31] same seeker yes for the secret
[55:33] nope oh second
[55:35] i'm sorry all those in favor all right
[55:38] okay uh the resulting ordinance for bear
[55:40] street in south avenue
[55:42] um yep related to the same thing this is
[55:44] just the recommendation to pass an
[55:46] ordinance um changing the zoning
[55:47] district from r2 to the c4
[55:51] any questions around that
[55:54] second all those in favor
[55:56] thank you all right thank you
[55:59] okay the next item on the agenda is to
[56:01] award three bids and contracts for this
[56:03] connected police department fire and
[56:04] raid mr wallon
[56:06] so
[56:08] as uh we may or may not be aware
[56:10] the
[56:11] seneca police department actually has a
[56:13] firing range
[56:14] fire
[56:15] has not functioned in quite some time
[56:18] um
[56:19] chief sieber did receive a grant to uh
[56:21] upgrade the facility and get it back to
[56:22] functioning we have been working with a
[56:24] consultant taking a little longer than
[56:26] we hoped but we have finally put out a
[56:29] bid for the work
[56:31] what you may see is there are actually
[56:33] four given the
[56:34] amount of money that this contract is it
[56:37] is a essentially
[56:39] a million dollar contract in a way
[56:42] we have to follow wick's law which
[56:44] separates all of the
[56:46] duties there's mechanical there's
[56:47] electrical plumbing in general
[56:50] we put it out
[56:51] we called it a
[56:53] firing range ventilation upgrade we got
[56:56] three we did not get a gc bit
[56:59] we think that was due to the fact that
[57:01] it was called spd
[57:03] ventilation because the majority of the
[57:05] work is in here's ventilation but the gc
[57:07] component we did not get any prices so
[57:09] we met with aaron and we discussed it
[57:12] and we said we were comfortable with
[57:13] these bids they were
[57:15] actually i think a little less than our
[57:16] estimate they're contractors that we've
[57:18] worked with so what we're doing is we're
[57:20] putting out the gc pro on wednesday with
[57:22] a new title called
[57:24] firing range reconstruction because we
[57:26] want to hit the ticklers on the web to
[57:29] make sure that gc see it
[57:31] so this is three of the four they are
[57:33] independent
[57:35] and then once we have the gc back and
[57:37] awarded we can begin the project
[57:39] so
[57:40] are there questions mr probably yeah so
[57:42] the group covers the entire cost of this
[57:45] no okay the grant covers a portion of
[57:47] the cost we're going to be using uh in
[57:50] our capital budget not
[57:51] in our capital budget we have a
[57:53] facilities line item for city facilities
[57:56] we'll be using the city's facilities
[57:58] line to cover that portion of them
[58:00] because the grant
[58:02] the grant was for let's say the
[58:06] pertinence is inside of it the the
[58:08] tracks the burn those things but as we
[58:11] started researching
[58:13] um
[58:13] the actual ventilation
[58:15] the engineering components of how to get
[58:18] air flow how to make sure that when you
[58:20] shoot the lead goes down range the fumes
[58:23] go out we have a hepa filtration system
[58:25] it's actually you know a lot more
[58:27] advanced than it is so we put the
[58:29] capital budget together to cover those
[58:31] costs
[58:32] so it's once again
[58:34] a couple different fund sources like we
[58:35] say but we we do have it together um and
[58:38] uh we're going to be ready to move
[58:40] forward but no the grant couldn't it
[58:42] didn't cover all of it because the cost
[58:43] just went up we also had uh you weren't
[58:45] here at the time about two years ago um
[58:47] there was lead in asbestos
[58:49] we used a good amount of money i led an
[58:51] asbestos abatement to
[58:54] evade the whole area and clean it up we
[58:56] had to clean the floors actually mop
[58:58] them like several times to get let off
[59:00] the floor so it's a it's an interesting
[59:02] process but it is going to be uh you
[59:04] know a very functioning range that they
[59:06] can use hopefully for the next you know
[59:08] 30 40 years so that's what we're hoping
[59:10] for but um this is for the three and
[59:12] then i'll be bringing you the fourth
[59:13] once we have it in a couple of weeks and
[59:16] then from there we'll move forward with
[59:18] hopefully construction get get it all
[59:20] functioning again
[59:21] any other questions mr what's it aaron
[59:23] yeah just uh talking aside with mr
[59:25] colding i think we should pass this in
[59:27] individual um contract one e
[59:30] sorry 1b 1c and 1d there are separate um
[59:34] subcontractors yeah that'd be great
[59:36] so three three approvals i would like to
[59:38] recommend that we do them individually
[59:40] okay
[59:42] are there any other questions before i
[59:44] no
[59:45] okay so first of all i'll entertain a
[59:47] motion on contract one b
[59:50] so second all those in favor all right
[59:54] uh second uh and shiny motion on
[59:56] contract 1c
[59:58] so
[59:58] second all those in favor all right
[1:00:01] and finally uh concerning motion on
[1:00:03] contract one and d
[1:00:05] so
[1:00:06] second all those in favor all right all
[1:00:08] right thank you
[1:00:09] all right and we'll just make sure
[1:00:10] that's reflected in there all right
[1:00:12] thank you um the
[1:00:15] next item on the agenda is the award
[1:00:17] vision contracts with the bail park
[1:00:19] improvement uh project phase two
[1:00:21] yes thank you so this you you might
[1:00:23] recall seeing this before
[1:00:25] um this is actually the third time we've
[1:00:27] bid this hopefully the last thing is
[1:00:29] we're talking about bail park tree
[1:00:31] removal um
[1:00:33] previously we had a discrepancy in the
[1:00:36] bid documents that meant that we had to
[1:00:38] rebid it there was some language that
[1:00:39] got left in from the previous bid
[1:00:41] we did receive three bids the bids were
[1:00:45] almost identical than before
[1:00:48] the low is still the same as the second
[1:00:50] time that we bid it the cost per tree
[1:00:53] might have actually come down a little
[1:00:54] bit but uh and then this particular
[1:00:56] bidder we're doing they just to let you
[1:00:58] in behind the curtain a little bit we're
[1:01:00] doing something to a little bit more
[1:01:01] proactive on my office where we're
[1:01:03] receiving the bids we are not
[1:01:05] immediately rushing them to this table
[1:01:07] so we receive the bids on wednesday we
[1:01:09] used to bring them right to the
[1:01:11] legislative and then monday so now what
[1:01:13] we're doing is we're taking a step back
[1:01:15] we're working with ron
[1:01:16] and we're really making sure that we
[1:01:18] have all of our utilization paperwork
[1:01:20] that ron's having a moment to vet them a
[1:01:22] little bit more thoroughly and then
[1:01:24] we're moving forward so in this case
[1:01:26] uh they've been working with ron
[1:01:28] actually for four weeks because they
[1:01:29] knew that we had to rebid it and i
[1:01:31] believe that you've been happy with the
[1:01:32] progress that you've seen you've had
[1:01:34] some good emails back and forth they now
[1:01:35] have what three subs that they're going
[1:01:38] to be using absolutely
[1:01:40] so um so that's kind of a new process
[1:01:42] you're not going to see things coming
[1:01:43] here as fast because instead of us
[1:01:46] awarding and then going through the
[1:01:48] process we're going to go through the
[1:01:50] process make sure we're on the same page
[1:01:52] then award just so that we don't get
[1:01:54] caught in any kind of a you know the
[1:01:55] carrot is the award
[1:01:57] so we want to make sure that we're doing
[1:01:58] it in that process and so it's worked in
[1:02:01] this process we're doing it a couple
[1:02:02] others
[1:02:03] so
[1:02:04] well thank you for that consideration
[1:02:05] sure is that just a question so is that
[1:02:07] a best practice that they can do moving
[1:02:09] forward for all projects or just kind of
[1:02:11] my office sure yeah
[1:02:13] that's what we've started to do and i
[1:02:15] think it's worked better that way don't
[1:02:16] you ron yeah absolutely
[1:02:23] all right the remaining items are all
[1:02:25] for property sales and we'll be um
[1:02:28] an executive session so i'd like to
[1:02:30] entertain a motion to recess
[1:02:32] so second all of the favorite
[1:02:34] we're reset
[1:02:37] so
[1:02:49] yeah
[1:02:50] yeah so i would like to get a motion
[1:02:54] second
[1:02:56] oh
[1:02:58] all in favor
[1:03:06] interest
[1:03:07] related to uh foreclosure action the
[1:03:09] other one is a claim
[1:03:11] okay so so are you saying they're both
[1:03:14] should be an executive session okay um
[1:03:17] with regard to
[1:03:18] number four that from government
[1:03:20] operations earlier yeah
[1:03:23] i don't know exactly what the discussion
[1:03:26] is around
[1:03:28] i just want to make sure that it's
[1:03:29] covered by executive session it has to
[1:03:31] fall within the scope of what's allowed
[1:03:34] under open meetings law
[1:03:36] um so i don't know the scope of you know
[1:03:38] well i i talked to mayor batman and so
[1:03:41] um so what we would be discussing we me
[1:03:43] too
[1:03:44] um
[1:03:45] it's it's around personnel
[1:03:53] i mean personnel generally is could be
[1:03:54] discussed in executive session yeah can
[1:03:57] yes it can
[1:03:59] it depends on the level of detail
[1:04:00] obviously i you know without me knowing
[1:04:03] the level of detail or you know
[1:04:07] but i'll you know obviously um
[1:04:11] i'll i'll defer to you um on the
[1:04:13] discussion um obviously things related
[1:04:15] to employees and
[1:04:19] employment history
[1:04:21] is privy to executive session
[1:04:24] um it is around employees i can say that
[1:04:26] i guess
[1:04:30] okay i'm part of that yep as one make
[1:04:32] sure yes
[1:04:34] so i think we're in
[1:04:36] yeah
[1:04:40] [Music]
[1:05:13] you