1
00:00:08,110 --> 00:00:31,590
Seven o'clock, I am going to go ahead and call the meeting to order. Let's do roll call, please. Commissioner Brown. Here. Commissioner Crescenson. Here. Commissioner Bonsocka. Here. Commissioner Jordan. Commissioner Lawrence. Commissioner Swin. Commissioner Thompson. Here. Commissioner Wolk. Okay, let's stand for the pledge of allegiance.

2
00:00:46,410 --> 00:00:46,890
All

3
00:00:48,970 --> 00:00:56,390
right. The first item is to approve the agenda for tonight. I don't believe there's any modifications. So can I get a motion to approve the agenda?

4
00:00:56,390 --> 00:01:02,310
I have one modification on page 5, my mistake.

5
00:01:02,870 --> 00:01:04,770
The motion to approve the agenda.

6
00:01:05,110 --> 00:01:06,570
We'll move to approve the agenda.

7
00:01:07,590 --> 00:01:12,090
All right, motion by Wolf, second by Lorenz, all those in favor say aye.

8
00:01:13,190 --> 00:01:13,670
Opposed?

9
00:01:14,070 --> 00:01:14,950
That motion carries.

10
00:01:15,610 --> 00:01:16,550
Next on the minutes.

11
00:01:17,050 --> 00:01:19,270
Are there any changes to the minutes this week?

12
00:01:19,870 --> 00:01:21,430
One modification, Madam Chair.

13
00:01:22,110 --> 00:01:22,390
Go ahead.

14
00:01:22,390 --> 00:01:28,610
Okay. Page 5, the third full paragraph down where it says Wolf asked when construction is planned to begin.

15
00:01:28,610 --> 00:01:34,690
I believe that should be Jordan asked when construction is planned to begin, and then with that change, I'll move to approve the minutes.

16
00:01:36,470 --> 00:01:37,650
Any other changes?

17
00:01:40,300 --> 00:01:41,660
Okay, we have a motion by Wolf.

18
00:01:44,120 --> 00:01:44,340
Second.

19
00:01:44,540 --> 00:01:45,500
Second by Brown.

20
00:01:45,820 --> 00:01:46,960
All those in favor say aye.

21
00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:47,540
Aye.

22
00:01:48,420 --> 00:01:48,820
Opposed?

23
00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:50,440
That motion carries.

24
00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:54,320
There are no public hearings on the agenda tonight.

25
00:01:54,320 --> 00:02:02,380
There is a one application in request, a review for Final Platt for Big Sky Third Edition,

26
00:02:03,260 --> 00:02:12,540
which is a single, or a 35-lot single-family development to be located at 1.57th Street in Aquila Avenue Project 21-62.

27
00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,000
Thank you, Chair Craigs and good evening members of the commission.

28
00:02:17,500 --> 00:02:23,380
As stated, the item before you is a Final Platt request for Big Sky State's third edition.

29
00:02:26,360 --> 00:02:30,180
The property is approximately 74.8 acres in size.

30
00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:33,700
It is surrounded by low density residential to the north.

31
00:02:34,420 --> 00:02:36,920
Previous phases of the big sky development

32
00:02:36,920 --> 00:02:38,220
to the east and southeast,

33
00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:39,760
in addition to an elementary school,

34
00:02:39,900 --> 00:02:40,660
a little further east,

35
00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:43,900
and remaining mining area to the west.

36
00:02:44,620 --> 00:02:47,980
And that mine is run by or owned by prior Lake Agregates Inc,

37
00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:50,920
who is the property owner at this time

38
00:02:50,920 --> 00:02:52,560
and subject to the application as well.

39
00:02:53,460 --> 00:02:55,000
And on the other side of County Road 44,

40
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,240
before we have City of Credit River property.

41
00:02:58,200 --> 00:03:01,140
The property is zoned to plan residential development today,

42
00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:02,560
and they are not proposing any changes

43
00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:04,360
to the zoning district with this request.

44
00:03:07,190 --> 00:03:09,550
So as stated, this is a final plat request.

45
00:03:10,350 --> 00:03:14,010
It is from an applicant, but they have a Keyland Development LLC,

46
00:03:14,290 --> 00:03:16,690
and we do have representatives in the audience this evening

47
00:03:16,690 --> 00:03:18,330
if you have questions for them later on.

48
00:03:18,990 --> 00:03:23,770
They are proposing to plat 35 single family lots and two outlots.

49
00:03:24,110 --> 00:03:26,470
And again, the zoning is planned residential development

50
00:03:26,470 --> 00:03:33,910
with no changes. And this group saw the preliminary PUD amendment back in January and it went

51
00:03:33,910 --> 00:03:39,090
to the Council in February. So now they're asking to go through the final process for, again,

52
00:03:39,290 --> 00:03:40,630
the same 35 lots.

53
00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:49,160
So lots in this third edition are consistent with the previously approved phases,

54
00:03:49,420 --> 00:03:57,020
1 and 2 related to size and setbacks. The setbacks for this development again would include 25 feet

55
00:03:57,020 --> 00:04:02,720
in the front and rear and side corner lots and seven and a half feet on each side yard.

56
00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:09,560
So on your screen right now is one of the two proposed grading plan pages and the box

57
00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:15,700
that you can kind of see within the lot area there is considered the building pad which

58
00:04:15,700 --> 00:04:19,320
would comply with those setbacks that we just discussed for each of those lots.

59
00:04:20,140 --> 00:04:23,960
It does not indicate that the house needs to be that large, however that would be the

60
00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:29,020
the building pad if someone wanted to pursue those minimum setback requirements.

61
00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:37,820
As shown on the grading plan, this particular addition will include an extension of the

62
00:04:37,820 --> 00:04:44,040
existing 157th Street right along here going northwest, as well as a temporary cul-de-sac

63
00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:47,340
to accommodate again the third addition.

64
00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:52,140
It is not known at this time if this will be extended in the future for another phase.

65
00:04:52,140 --> 00:04:57,200
So, at this time, staff is asking for, again, temporary construction of that cul-de-sac

66
00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:01,660
and at such time that that is extended, the easements and things would be vacated,

67
00:05:01,740 --> 00:05:03,180
and the road would be continued on.

68
00:05:04,560 --> 00:05:09,240
On the second page of the grading plan, which is addressing the kind of

69
00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:14,260
southeast portion of this project, it shows an extension of existing Aquila Avenue here,

70
00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:18,340
all the way down to the south with, again, another temporary cul-de-sac,

71
00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:24,740
which will be held within an easement document until further development of the property occurs.

72
00:05:28,850 --> 00:05:36,630
The existing 156th street that's kind of cut off here between the two plans that currently runs

73
00:05:36,630 --> 00:05:42,610
like so, kind of on the north side of the second edition currently stops right about here.

74
00:05:42,830 --> 00:05:47,110
So it will be extended just a little bit further and it will be considered a T kind

75
00:05:47,110 --> 00:05:51,810
of intersection for the time being, until such time for the development occurs to the west.

76
00:05:52,410 --> 00:05:56,990
So I do have a signage and lighting plan that we can look at in a few slides, but again,

77
00:05:57,130 --> 00:05:59,270
there will be a T intersection here temporarily.

78
00:06:00,110 --> 00:06:05,250
This road has been identified as a collector street moving forward, so we typically would

79
00:06:05,250 --> 00:06:09,510
not have driveway accesses and things of that nature off of a collector street.

80
00:06:10,010 --> 00:06:14,430
So again, this particular addition continues that concept, meaning the lots that are adjacent

81
00:06:14,430 --> 00:06:17,410
into it would be serviced by 157th Street.

82
00:06:20,620 --> 00:06:27,800
Also, on this page you can see that there is an extension right here on the north side of 157th Street

83
00:06:27,800 --> 00:06:32,300
to extend the existing Batuminous Trail that currently stops right about.

84
00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:39,200
So where my cursor is in the first edition, that is proposed to be extended up until 156th Street intersection

85
00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:43,880
and engineering is comfortable with that trail stopping at that point.

86
00:06:44,380 --> 00:06:50,720
but we would also still have sidewalk connections that continue on the entire length up to that temporary cul-de-sac.

87
00:06:57,490 --> 00:07:03,130
As you can see on this plan, there is no park identified and there was not a park identified during the preliminary phases.

88
00:07:03,710 --> 00:07:11,330
And as we discussed that length at the preliminary PUD amendment phase, the applicant as well as the property owner is aware,

89
00:07:11,810 --> 00:07:17,310
that prior to the submittal of a fourth edition request, they need to submit a revised sketch plan

90
00:07:17,310 --> 00:07:31,870
to show us an updated concept for where they anticipate the future phases as well as future road conditions or to be road connections, trail connections as well as an approximate 8 to 10 acre park as identified in our parks plan.

91
00:07:32,450 --> 00:07:44,150
So again, we're accepting park fees in lieu of actual land dedication with this particular item and we will have more information as future phases come in regarding the placement of those sorts of amenities.

92
00:07:44,150 --> 00:07:45,370
Again,

93
00:07:47,620 --> 00:07:50,900
here was the second page of the grading plan showing the kind of the southeast side

94
00:07:50,900 --> 00:07:52,420
in the extension of Aquila Avenue.

95
00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:59,440
The next slide shows a landscape plan that was required to be submitted by the applicant,

96
00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:06,040
particularly due to not only the required minimum two landscape trees for each lot, which

97
00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:13,980
they are showing here, but also to help identify and calculate the SS-9 trees, which we did talk

98
00:08:13,980 --> 00:08:20,240
again at the preliminary stage. So there were significant trees of a mesic oak species

99
00:08:20,240 --> 00:08:25,360
that were removed a number of years ago with the original, excuse me, initial development

100
00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:29,580
of this property. Therefore, the property owner and subsequent developers have agreed

101
00:08:29,580 --> 00:08:35,700
to replace mitigation trees as they do their phases. So the landscape plan before you,

102
00:08:35,780 --> 00:08:42,360
and again, due to the configuration, it is over two pages here, does show both the required

103
00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:45,740
land scape trees, two per lot, and the mitigation trees.

104
00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:51,300
So they are meeting the staff's mitigation requirements for this phase, and staff

105
00:08:51,300 --> 00:08:55,520
anticipates additional mitigation trees would be necessary in future phases until

106
00:08:55,520 --> 00:08:57,080
they satisfy the required amount.

107
00:08:59,530 --> 00:09:01,110
And so here's page two.

108
00:09:01,670 --> 00:09:06,610
So essentially what they're proposing to do with this particular landscape plan, they

109
00:09:06,610 --> 00:09:12,650
have proposed a total of 80 mitigation trees and 70 landscape trees, which again

110
00:09:12,650 --> 00:09:17,510
the landscape requirement is two trees per lot. The landscape requirement does not satisfy

111
00:09:17,510 --> 00:09:22,250
the mitigation requirement, which is why they have a total of 150 trees going in this third

112
00:09:22,850 --> 00:09:23,430
third edition.

113
00:09:29,010 --> 00:09:32,530
The plan on the screen right now also shows the signage and lighting plan,

114
00:09:32,530 --> 00:09:37,610
which we did discuss when it was last before this group. I'll be the colors are a little bit hard

115
00:09:37,610 --> 00:09:45,090
to see. They are proposing multiple stop signs here at the T intersection, which, again, is temporary

116
00:09:45,090 --> 00:09:46,890
until that road punches through.

117
00:09:47,270 --> 00:09:53,790
They've got three stop signs shown in kind of the red octagon, and then they have three stop, excuse me,

118
00:09:54,050 --> 00:10:00,330
three street lights, one kind of in the middle of block four, one on the corner here of the street intersection,

119
00:10:00,470 --> 00:10:04,850
and then another one down here, near the end of the Aquila Avenue street extension,

120
00:10:05,010 --> 00:10:08,330
which I believe was at the request of the commission back in January.

121
00:10:09,170 --> 00:10:11,770
So their plan does meet those items that were discussed.

122
00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:21,220
This last slide, albeit a little blurry, my apologies, actually shows what the big sky

123
00:10:21,220 --> 00:10:24,160
estate's third edition final flat document would look like.

124
00:10:24,740 --> 00:10:29,040
This would be the document that I actually would create those 35 lots and would be

125
00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:32,940
recorded at the county along with the development agreement and any other necessary

126
00:10:32,940 --> 00:10:36,400
easements that would be required as part of this project.

127
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:45,480
At this time, the development review committee is recommending approval, subject to the

128
00:10:45,480 --> 00:10:47,300
conditions that were included in your packet.

129
00:10:47,300 --> 00:10:53,080
The list on the screen is not list everything, but just wanted to summarize some of the larger

130
00:10:53,080 --> 00:10:58,320
items. Staff is requiring compliance with our review comment letters, which is a standard

131
00:10:58,320 --> 00:11:05,740
requirement. Staff is confident that the applicant will be able to meet the items within the letters

132
00:11:06,060 --> 00:11:11,940
from both the city staff as well as the prior Lake Spring Lake Watershed District. A couple

133
00:11:11,940 --> 00:11:17,680
All of the larger items that are in that comment letter relate to conservation easements that

134
00:11:17,680 --> 00:11:20,980
are being required to cover the steep slopes.

135
00:11:21,140 --> 00:11:27,000
I'm just going to go back here to the grading plan to accommodate and protect the steep slopes

136
00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:29,360
that are behind these lots here in block four.

137
00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:34,860
So city staff is requiring a conservation easement and the applicant is agreeable to executing

138
00:11:34,860 --> 00:11:40,980
that agreement to preserve those slopes, as well as a separate agreement for maintenance

139
00:11:40,980 --> 00:11:55,380
maintenance by the homeowners for the proposed retaining wall that covers lots 2 through 5 here in the back, as well as conservation easements with the prior lake spring lake watershed district to protect the wetland and wetland buffer areas here.

140
00:11:56,460 --> 00:12:09,340
This wetland is actually part of big sky second addition, but the buffer requirement may encroach slightly on a couple of the lots, particularly lot 8 and 9 and the applicant is aware of this and is comfortable

141
00:12:09,340 --> 00:12:13,900
affordable with executing those easements to protect those areas as staff is requiring.

142
00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:16,020
So I'm confident we'll be able to meet those conditions.

143
00:12:20,540 --> 00:12:28,820
The other recommendations, again, is a pretty standard needing to execute all the required easements like we just talked about related to conservation easements.

144
00:12:29,200 --> 00:12:33,600
The temporary turnarounds for 157th and Aquila Avenue.

145
00:12:34,340 --> 00:12:40,360
The nice part about those particular easements is they're being drafted in a fashion so that when future development occurs,

146
00:12:40,360 --> 00:12:45,960
They will go away, if you will, so we don't necessarily have to come back and vacate them.

147
00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:51,120
So we've used that tool in the past and it seems to work well, as well as any easement

148
00:12:51,120 --> 00:12:54,560
for the prior lake spring lake watershed district is requiring for those wetlands.

149
00:12:55,220 --> 00:12:57,960
We touched on setbacks already and those were included in the report.

150
00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:03,820
The impervious surface is also a requirement for staff and staff in the applicant have discussed

151
00:13:03,820 --> 00:13:09,480
Plus that, and are comfortable with a 38% maximum for each lot in the third edition.

152
00:13:10,360 --> 00:13:15,700
And we also are keeping the same architectural standards that were required as part of phase one and phase two.

153
00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:18,200
So that would be consistent here again in phase three.

154
00:13:18,820 --> 00:13:23,500
And lastly, that we touched on was the requirement for a revised sketch plan.

155
00:13:23,620 --> 00:13:28,420
Be submitted prior to any future additions within the big sky development.

156
00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:43,040
The last slide is just, again, an overview of what the title sheet, if you will, kind of showing the proposed 35 lots as well as the building paths and anticipated driveway locations.

157
00:13:43,780 --> 00:13:46,640
We do have a rod just here representing Keyland.

158
00:13:46,780 --> 00:13:50,880
If you have any questions for the applicant, otherwise I'm happy to take any questions you might have.

159
00:13:52,100 --> 00:13:56,200
Okay, thank you, commissioners, go ahead.

160
00:13:56,200 --> 00:14:19,740
Madam Chair, Amanda, the tree mitigation plan will this follow what occurred in the first edition where the trees went in right afterwards before any houses were constructed and most of them either died or were destroyed during housing construction or will these go in after the houses are built?

161
00:14:20,480 --> 00:14:25,200
Commissioner Thompson, planning commission members, that's certainly something that we can work with the applicant on.

162
00:14:25,820 --> 00:14:30,700
Part of that might depend on the time of year in which they are actually doing the home building.

163
00:14:30,980 --> 00:14:37,920
It's my understanding that they're looking to continue to move forward and work on that as soon as possible once approvals are given so that would be yet in this year.

164
00:14:38,660 --> 00:14:45,580
But certainly I can let the applicant speak to maybe if something happened in a previous phase so that we don't repeat that moving forward.

165
00:14:49,130 --> 00:14:54,110
And if you'd like the applicant to come up, now we certainly can, other ways we can take other questions.

166
00:14:55,090 --> 00:14:59,970
I mean, in the first phase there was a mixed build of multiple builders, but when everything was

167
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:28,780
All the trees were flooded and the streets were finished. All the trees went in. So the trees were all in before any houses went out. And of course, and trees died and trees were removed in order to put houses in or they were destroyed or they died in the interim. So the mitigation plan didn't actually go to plan. Commissioner Thompson just in hearing you explain a little bit more. I do not know exactly what the requirements were for the first edition as far as placement of those trees.

168
00:15:28,780 --> 00:15:44,640
But the applicant and staff have had conversations regarding those trees that are required for the two trees per lot landscape trees need to actually be planted on the lot, not within the right of way, if you will, or the boulevard area.

169
00:15:44,860 --> 00:15:52,720
So that may alleviate some of the issues that may have happened in previous phases where the trees were actually planted in the boulevard.

170
00:15:52,720 --> 00:16:19,340
But prior to building permits being issued, and then you had an issue where potentially they were in the way or the placement of those trees was not accommodating to construction equipment, actually trying to access those sites on that same note, those two landscape trees then typically are not put in until after the sod and at that phase of the home building, and we do require an escrow to make sure that those trees do get installed and they are warranted for a period of one year.

171
00:16:19,340 --> 00:16:28,940
So, I'm hoping that with those trees being placed on the individual properties as the homes are built, that will alleviate maybe some of the challenges that happened in the earlier phase.

172
00:16:29,220 --> 00:16:35,160
I'm actually referring to the mitigation trees that were placed ahead of time. The landscape trees weren't the issue.

173
00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:40,280
It was the mitigation trees that were placed. Also, those have either been destroyed or died off.

174
00:16:41,800 --> 00:16:47,720
Sure, so noted, as if you look at the plan, a lot of the green circles, or the shapes

175
00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:52,420
you can see, those are the proposed locations for those mitigation trees, and a lot of them

176
00:16:52,420 --> 00:16:55,400
are in the rear yards or beyond.

177
00:16:56,040 --> 00:16:59,580
So hopefully that won't be the case, but certainly something that we can make sure that the applicant

178
00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:05,760
is aware of, so that those mitigation trees do, in fact, survive those build periods, if

179
00:17:05,760 --> 00:17:05,960
you will.

180
00:17:06,660 --> 00:17:07,100
Okay.

181
00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:08,020
Thank you.

182
00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:23,320
Maybe to expand on that, and this might be a question for the applicant, but as far as those mitigation trees go, typically with a normal landscape plan, the homeowner would be watering their tree every day.

183
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:34,500
So with these mitigation trees that look like they're put out away from the typical lots potentially or away from where the homes would be, how does that get handled?

184
00:17:34,500 --> 00:17:38,040
And how do you make sure that they try to stay alive once they are planted?

185
00:17:39,970 --> 00:17:41,970
I will defer to the applicant for that question.

186
00:17:42,270 --> 00:17:42,510
Okay.

187
00:17:43,690 --> 00:17:44,290
Would you like to do that?

188
00:17:44,290 --> 00:17:45,990
Let's have the applicant come up now, sure.

189
00:17:52,260 --> 00:17:55,020
I'm not just, I'm with key land, homes, key land development.

190
00:17:57,300 --> 00:18:01,040
In the first phase, we encountered some of the same problems that you're talking about.

191
00:18:01,120 --> 00:18:04,220
Trees were put in early, they weren't necessarily put in at the right elevations.

192
00:18:04,780 --> 00:18:07,200
Not putting the greatest of locations.

193
00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:10,920
And then we just all kind of had to deal with it.

194
00:18:11,040 --> 00:18:14,200
We're planning on putting these in as the houses are going in and after.

195
00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:17,460
So then we will have a homeowner there to water those trees.

196
00:18:18,380 --> 00:18:23,580
Once they're in, you put them in beforehand, you know, you've got to kind of keep your fingers crossed.

197
00:18:23,660 --> 00:18:27,000
You can water them occasionally, but it's just easier if you have somebody there.

198
00:18:27,680 --> 00:18:31,460
So they will be warranted for the first year, which is what you get from most three people.

199
00:18:31,460 --> 00:18:37,720
So we did locate them away from the houses, towards the rear yards.

200
00:18:38,220 --> 00:18:41,360
We were required to keep them out of the drainage and utility easements.

201
00:18:41,860 --> 00:18:46,340
So we think we have them laid out pretty well where they shouldn't be a problem for anybody.

202
00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:48,280
And we'll be a nice amenity in the neighborhood.

203
00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:50,460
Okay.

204
00:18:50,740 --> 00:18:51,120
Thank you.

205
00:18:51,540 --> 00:18:51,620
Yep.

206
00:18:54,180 --> 00:18:55,340
Commissioner's other questions?

207
00:18:59,180 --> 00:18:59,660
Madam Chair.

208
00:19:00,140 --> 00:19:00,420
Go ahead.

209
00:19:01,740 --> 00:19:06,060
Amanda, did the applicant meet all the conditions from the preliminary approval?

210
00:19:07,220 --> 00:19:09,180
Yes, Commissioner Wolfe, thank you for mentioning that.

211
00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:11,680
I should have included that in part of my presentation.

212
00:19:12,020 --> 00:19:15,400
Yes, they have met all of the requirements of the preliminary approval.

213
00:19:16,020 --> 00:19:20,320
There are still some comments as shown in the review comment letter that still need to be

214
00:19:20,320 --> 00:19:24,500
addressed, but they were all for the best of my knowledge incorporated and the applicant

215
00:19:24,500 --> 00:19:27,860
is aware and against that is confident that they'll be able to meet those requirements.

216
00:19:28,780 --> 00:19:32,800
And all other applicable regulations, if they may all those as well.

217
00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:34,180
The best of my knowledge, yes.

218
00:19:34,180 --> 00:19:34,300
Yes.

219
00:19:34,500 --> 00:19:34,720
Okay.

220
00:19:34,860 --> 00:19:35,120
Thank you.

221
00:19:39,660 --> 00:19:40,800
Any other questions?

222
00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:46,300
Seeing none.

223
00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:47,580
I'd entertain a motion.

224
00:19:47,920 --> 00:19:49,200
If somebody would like to make one.

225
00:19:49,980 --> 00:19:50,500
Madam Chair.

226
00:19:50,820 --> 00:19:51,100
Go ahead.

227
00:19:51,600 --> 00:20:01,840
I would move to recommend approval of the final plat for Big Sky State's third edition contingent on the development view committee conditions, as noted in the staff report.

228
00:20:02,380 --> 00:20:02,600
Second.

229
00:20:03,220 --> 00:20:03,660
All right.

230
00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:06,420
We have a motion by Wolf and a second by Christensen.

231
00:20:06,840 --> 00:20:08,400
All those in favor say aye.

232
00:20:08,720 --> 00:20:09,040
Aye.

233
00:20:09,720 --> 00:20:10,260
Opposed?

234
00:20:10,760 --> 00:20:17,060
That motion carries. And I believe that will go to the City Council meeting then on April 4th.

235
00:20:18,060 --> 00:20:18,980
Correct, Chair Craigs.

236
00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:19,580
All right.

237
00:20:22,240 --> 00:20:26,540
The next, I am staff reports. Are there any staff reports tonight?

238
00:20:27,400 --> 00:20:34,080
I was just going to give an update. So the Minnesota MASH application that you had seen at your last meeting, that actually it got delayed.

239
00:20:34,100 --> 00:20:41,660
The developer asked that to be put on hold just he wanted some additional time to review the developer's agreement so that also will go to the City Council meeting on April 4th.

240
00:20:41,660 --> 00:20:48,760
And then the way it's looking right now, I don't believe we'll have any agenda items for the April 7th.

241
00:20:48,760 --> 00:20:50,300
All right.

242
00:20:52,750 --> 00:20:56,390
Any old business? How about new business?

243
00:20:59,220 --> 00:21:00,140
Meetings adjourned.