[0:00] [Music]
[0:54] he
[0:56] [Music]
[2:38] I'd like to call the or concy city
[2:39] council committee meeting for Monday May
[2:41] 20th 2024 and the first committee is
[2:44] Public Safety Mr Williams thank you so
[2:46] I'd like to call the order Public Safety
[2:48] we have one item on the agenda tonight
[2:50] that is the lead of Women Voters super
[2:52] recommendation
[2:54] May thank you Mr chairman the submitted
[2:58] uh names the recommendation from uh Leal
[3:02] woman voters ask for the favorable
[3:04] consideration councel you any questions
[3:07] or
[3:09] comments move second all in favor I are
[3:13] there any other items to call public sa
[3:15] the committee any have motion toour so
[3:18] move second all in
[3:21] favor I would like to call the finance
[3:23] committee to order and the first item is
[3:25] the annual fee waiver for exterior
[3:28] building repair
[3:31] [Music]
[3:34] from everyone should have received an
[3:37] email from the last week with regards to
[3:39] the the 2023
[3:42] reports um this
[3:45] year I'm looking to continue this
[3:48] exterior perit waiver for the period of
[3:50] June 1st to August
[3:53] 31st and there is
[3:57] a there is a dve um
[4:00] letter and package to kind of identify
[4:02] the same thing from the previous years
[4:05] we just continue with the changing the
[4:07] dates and and continue to carry this
[4:09] program forward last year um we were
[4:12] able to give back to our neighborhood
[4:14] almost
[4:16] $24,000 as incentive for encouraging
[4:18] home owners to um pull permits which is
[4:21] very important make sure they pull the
[4:23] permit get it inspected by the our court
[4:26] enforcement offic so make sure they are
[4:27] doing the correct thing and applying the
[4:29] code evenly across so I'm looking um to
[4:33] continue this program and to continue
[4:35] our give back to our neighborhood as
[4:38] they continue to revitalize the neighood
[4:40] across the
[4:41] [Music]
[4:42] city open for
[4:45] questions go ahead please uh so thank
[4:48] you definitely sounds like a wonderful
[4:50] opportunity to offer our our homeowners
[4:52] or individuals wanting to like do this
[4:54] type of work in their homes um based on
[4:57] the conversation we're able to have and
[4:59] definitely I like to see a
[5:00] substantiating documentation on the back
[5:02] end to speak to some of the added
[5:04] benefits to our community uh as we seek
[5:07] to have more budgetary conversations
[5:09] throughout the year leading up to this
[5:11] upcoming budget season I just want to
[5:12] make sure at least I am being consistent
[5:15] and evaluating all um opportunities
[5:17] where we are trying to make a
[5:20] concessions with our community just so
[5:22] we can speak to those in in further
[5:23] detail when the question is ultimately
[5:25] asked how do we pass a uh successful
[5:27] budget that the mayor will approve
[5:32] am questions go ahead please chairman
[5:35] the wording
[5:38] uh highlight have for the maximum permit
[5:41] value of
[5:44] $35,000 that for the construction value
[5:47] of 35,000 not the value
[5:50] of permit fees no no no that's a
[5:53] construction value so and this applies
[5:57] to residential construction that is
[6:00] that's correct yes on one to four unit
[6:03] residential property one to four
[6:05] units for bullet on the
[6:08] bottom go ahead please I just um wanted
[6:11] to have you highlight I think that you
[6:13] had told us how much it was that we
[6:16] saved the residents last year it was
[6:17] around yes I did mention that but I can
[6:19] pull that last year on the the regular
[6:23] permit that's the application fee wave
[6:25] was
[6:27] $4,280 for a total of
[6:32] 200 255 permits that was pulled within
[6:36] that period of time that was weigh
[6:41] $56 this back here and then the fencing
[6:44] was U 24 permits Val
[6:47] $1200 and Roofing $85 permits $8,500
[6:51] totally
[6:52] $23,988
[6:54] uh this is the largest um incentive give
[6:58] back to our community is the highest
[7:00] year last
[7:02] year and um know there homeowners are
[7:05] looking forward for this um some of us
[7:08] might say it's U we're losing Revenue
[7:10] but at the same time we're giving back
[7:11] to our community we're buying in to them
[7:13] re having the houses and at the same
[7:16] time this is our incentive towards them
[7:18] continue to pull the permit rather than
[7:20] them working without permits on weekends
[7:23] and evening and not pulling a permit by
[7:25] allowing them to pull the permit W up
[7:27] the fees and get the work done
[7:31] that's for
[7:37] required go ahead please sorry okay so
[7:40] um Mr M usually four um it's usually one
[7:42] to three there res four units don't they
[7:44] become commercial a four unit
[7:47] residence I I would not be able to
[7:50] answer but this is the same uh
[7:51] information that we had from the
[7:53] beginning so we just carrying power here
[7:54] to years so there's been a lot of
[7:56] discussion lately about commercial
[7:58] versus residential so I mean it's I
[8:01] don't have a problem changing it to one
[8:03] to three I mean this is something that
[8:04] we've been carrying year to year so as
[8:06] we revisit it we can make changes as we
[8:08] go along so if there is
[8:12] a an agreement to to change to one to
[8:15] three
[8:16] I that um so president pfield is right
[8:21] so there's been a lot about you know
[8:22] four units become like a commercial
[8:24] trash versus residential trash but you
[8:27] probably just check what with code and Zoning just to make
[8:33] sure and then change it to three if need
[8:35] be
[8:39] or I mean we can I'm up to I mean
[8:43] changing it the want to me that's um the
[8:47] council's direction I'm okay with
[8:49] changing it 1 to three 1 to three okay
[8:58] yeah so Mr M with this um it it it
[9:02] increases the value of the home does
[9:03] that also
[9:05] increase assessment assessment on their
[9:08] property well at some stage if an
[9:12] extension is done or A change is done on
[9:15] the property while they're doing
[9:16] construction yeah that will take an
[9:18] assessment
[9:20] increase that's what Mr MO is saying
[9:23] generally if it is a maintenance issue
[9:26] it does not increase the value of the
[9:28] property if it's an expansion
[9:32] or increase in the functionality of the
[9:34] property then the assessment would go
[9:38] up go ahead please and then from our
[9:40] conversation I don't know if I was
[9:42] explicit in in this setting but I would
[9:44] like to see um an account of how many uh
[9:49] expansion efforts and then what was that
[9:51] additional value added to our city just
[9:53] so we can properly identify the full
[9:55] impact of this program and then since it
[9:57] has been year to year to here or it's
[10:00] been here since I've been on the council
[10:02] I think an appropriate conversation
[10:03] would then be um how do we evaluate
[10:05] maybe streamline this into into the
[10:07] budget if that's an opportunity but uh I
[10:10] think looking at the permanency of this
[10:12] and then are there other facets of uh
[10:14] coding that we can evaluate for these
[10:16] types of gains as well if that's what
[10:19] the data
[10:21] reads go Mr M would this have already
[10:25] then however been a part of our budget
[10:27] planning for 202
[10:29] for talk so that's something we can
[10:32] consider to add this into the line as
[10:34] a revenue reduction can I say give back
[10:38] so we can account this in and out of the
[10:40] budget on code's
[10:43] Department I
[10:45] am we will have to engage the assessor
[10:48] office to look at the the 255 plus 2485
[10:54] cor to see which one triggers an
[10:56] expansion or a
[10:57] change that uh would ultimately U adjust
[11:01] the assessment
[11:05] value that is something I can reach out
[11:07] to and and see if we can get that done
[11:10] thank
[11:11] you go ahead so timing wise though we'll
[11:14] put this back um because we'd have to
[11:16] come back to our next committee meeting
[11:18] is that what you wanting us to do we are you because we're looking to have
[11:22] this start on June 1st is that some
[11:26] information you wanted to to kind of get
[11:28] on hand and then look at it over into
[11:30] next year so I would say since it would
[11:32] appear that many residents in the city
[11:34] have functioned with this understanding
[11:35] already in mind I think delaying that
[11:37] especially you speak so confidently
[11:38] about the program I'm not challenging
[11:40] that I think for me I would like to ask
[11:42] to kind of continue and then should we
[11:44] identify any uh variations I I would
[11:47] like to have the opportunity to kind of
[11:48] readdress this at the council yes
[11:50] absolutely we u i I do have notes and
[11:53] that we'll follow up and get those
[11:55] reports to all of us so will we have the
[11:57] reports by um Friday are you saying
[12:00] before we get to um not okay I been able to answer that
[12:05] control with staff availability I will
[12:09] send out request to the May sh and ask
[12:12] the staff
[12:13] to to get that report for us
[12:17] okay I'm guessing it shouldn't be long
[12:19] because the reports that reports appear
[12:22] but it's just that they have to look at
[12:23] the type of formats that was
[12:25] pulled the type of work that was done
[12:31] any other
[12:33] comments no but next week is May 28th I
[12:35] mean our our meeting is May 28 yes so
[12:38] that's what we move forward with this
[12:40] and we'll follow up with those reports
[12:42] and make sure you have them in hand so
[12:44] in the future I would ask for that going
[12:47] forward along with the permit report I
[12:50] would ask for also the expansion or
[12:52] anything of maor impact thank you I just
[12:56] do have one other comment about putting
[12:58] in the budget um I'm not so sure that we could do that and make it work
[13:02] because in the budget we give a uh
[13:05] definite number like let's say 25,000
[13:07] but if there are more people that take
[13:08] advantage when we get to that $25,000
[13:10] what happens then so we we want to keep
[13:13] in mind if we give a definitive number
[13:15] then when we get there what happens to
[13:17] the people that may go over I know that
[13:18] it's not something we need to discuss
[13:20] today because we're not in budget season
[13:21] yet but coming close um then you know we
[13:24] can talk about then so I just want to
[13:26] make sure that we consider that you know
[13:29] we've made this work the normal
[13:30] budgetary process would be is you have
[13:33] to find some way to offset this
[13:35] right
[13:38] so I shouldn't say Rost
[13:42] cost all right any other comments so but
[13:44] I understood Mr M to say that there's
[13:47] been return on investment based has
[13:49] there any has there been a return on
[13:50] investment with this program what what
[13:53] the coun what the city has waved has
[13:55] there been an increase in um well that's
[13:58] the report we going to look at we never
[14:00] looked at it nobody never has where
[14:02] we're looking it as the incentive of
[14:04] getting back 20 almost $24,000 so work
[14:08] was performed 255 permit regular permit
[14:11] was pulled within that that given time
[14:14] period last year plus the 24 plus the 85
[14:18] permits within that 3 months
[14:21] time so a lot of work was done during
[14:23] that that period of
[14:27] time and then uh sorry
[14:30] go ahead please and if I just lastly add
[14:32] definitely looking forward to planning
[14:33] my uh um shadowing of the Cod Department
[14:36] in the near future really excited about
[14:38] that um but I would love to hear from
[14:41] this department um there after this
[14:43] season uh just to understand to get a
[14:45] better indication of if there are any
[14:48] unforeseen hurdles or issues that they
[14:50] notice when they're in but I always love
[14:52] your information and sharing it with the
[14:55] table and and I just would like to add
[14:57] one other Mr M and since we have um new
[15:00] uh person heading up the cod's
[15:01] department I think it's make make sure
[15:02] we get this information CU they're not
[15:04] going to be familiar with it they
[15:05] weren't here last year no I did have the
[15:08] chief B request a meeting with him I met
[15:11] with him a couple weeks ago okay because
[15:14] when I asked for the report he asked so
[15:15] he did submit a report and asked to have
[15:17] a brief meeting so I high like the
[15:19] program okay with him all right yes and
[15:22] I walking through the detail of the
[15:23] program so you get a better
[15:24] understanding of this program that we
[15:26] are running for the last several years
[15:28] thank you
[15:31] all right so the only change we're going
[15:33] to have in this document here is that
[15:34] the first bullet on the bottom section
[15:37] is that residential property one to
[15:39] three
[15:42] units all right S have a motion to move
[15:45] I'll make the motion so move second all in favor I I thank you the
[15:53] next
[15:56] item is a swimming pool operat agreement
[15:59] with boys and
[16:03] Club you going do that me
[16:07] to I don't Council has any question that
[16:10] this is just a basic renewal of our
[16:13] operating agreement with the poison
[16:15] Girls Club to run the swimming
[16:17] pools uh they have submitted a uh
[16:21] proposal just under
[16:24] $200,000 uh it's
[16:27] uh a little flexibility with Central
[16:30] Park opening so playing around with what
[16:33] those hours would be where might extend
[16:37] them somewhat based on demand or
[16:40] weather uh it's a good partnership and
[16:44] relationship where they do the Staffing
[16:46] for the lifeguards and related activity
[16:48] and uh again we're looking forward to
[16:51] having Central Park pool open up and
[16:55] running question go ahead please so um
[16:58] you said a little bit of FX ility would
[16:59] made a change in the cost but maybe the
[17:01] hours is the only thing the actual cost
[17:03] I think went up a little bit in this
[17:06] I'll give you the numbers from last year
[17:08] this this is up a few th000 from what we
[17:11] paid last year but it reflects the
[17:15] hourly rate for the
[17:18] lifeguards okay M how many years have
[17:21] the boys and girls been doing this go
[17:23] ahead please goe sorry how many years
[17:27] have Bo
[17:35] been any other
[17:37] comments second second all in favor any
[17:41] other business for
[17:42] finance we have a motion to
[17:45] adour move second all in
[17:50] favor
[17:52] governments I would like to call to
[17:53] order government operation and for on to
[17:57] request the authorization dep part
[17:59] hydrochloric acid 2024 for the water
[18:06] department I'll cover this uh so like it
[18:09] say every year the water department
[18:10] solists bid for hydrop forc acid for our
[18:15] water wells um chemical is used in the
[18:17] treatment of our Municipal Water um we
[18:19] put it out the bid a low bid was
[18:21] received from Univar Solutions and
[18:22] $51,100 uh are Au recommending to
[18:27] purchase the product from Universal
[18:28] solutions for our Mr
[18:31] water
[18:33] questions seeing none I have a motion to
[18:38] move so Mo second all in favor I I thank
[18:44] you any other business for government
[18:46] operation motions for second all in
[18:49] favor I I thank you thank you I'd like
[18:52] to call the order City development and
[18:54] planning uh we have 17 items on the
[18:56] agenda the first item is the discussion
[18:58] a possible agreement regarding pad bolts
[19:00] in Central Park I don't see Mr lefon
[19:03] present is there anyone that's supposed
[19:05] to be taking this over for him if not no
[19:09] I'll address it this is a proposal that
[19:11] has come in to operate paddle boats in
[19:15] the
[19:17] uh cities connect to zise
[19:20] plake uh really I'm recommending that we
[19:24] entertain this I don't have a
[19:29] be structured
[19:31] or uh look to charge people could be as
[19:36] cheap as a few hundred might be
[19:41] $1,000 the city council president gets a
[19:46] discount uh to uh it's going back like
[19:51] 20 years ago we had paddle boats there
[19:54] they went her to decline uh so this
[19:57] would be a vendor coming in we would see
[19:59] how it goes uh looking to get a little
[20:02] revenue for the city but they would pick
[20:04] up all the risk and assessment uh for
[20:07] Staffing providing the equipment and uh
[20:10] just managing the operation and so we'd
[20:13] see how it is this year and then be able
[20:15] to have a more formal uh relationship
[20:18] next
[20:21] year I do they because we have we just
[20:24] have the lrs are they anticipating a
[20:26] start time and we you know we'd like to
[20:27] see the background information done the
[20:30] company that they we look to get it
[20:32] started as soon as possible sometime in
[20:35] June running it through Labor Day uh and
[20:39] again the question comes what's the
[20:42] council think it's worth is it uh few
[20:46] hundred $1,000 I don't think they're
[20:49] going to participate if we set the
[20:51] number too high and some of that
[20:54] discussion could actually go into
[20:56] executive session the council wants to
[20:58] get
[21:00] into the Min of
[21:03] contract um what I'd like to see is
[21:05] actually what they're offering you know
[21:07] and all that without necessarily getting
[21:09] to the price because that's going to
[21:10] help us determine what the cost is going
[21:12] to be so um I I have the woman's name
[21:15] but not the name of the organization or
[21:16] anything so I think if in two weeks we
[21:18] could at least hear more about what
[21:21] they're offering the uh organization and
[21:24] you know have they done this before and those kind of things okay
[21:29] other questions if they had a package
[21:32] together and as soon be the number of
[21:34] votes the type of votes
[21:36] this business plan would the council
[21:40] consider it for unanimous consent on
[21:42] Monday M Patrick I I would I think it's
[21:45] a great idea I you know heard many many
[21:48] stories of um folks using the paddle
[21:50] poats I think it would add yet another
[21:53] you know feature to our beautiful
[21:55] Central Park so um I definitely would be
[21:58] in favor of but I'm hoping we'll bring
[21:59] in $24,000 in Revenue um that was a Mr
[22:04] mud that was
[22:07] sorry I know you were coming but in any
[22:09] case I I I think it would be a great a
[22:12] great I'm not sure we can get it
[22:13] together if we
[22:16] could um get your hands up click in your
[22:19] pen um I I really can't commit to you
[22:22] set till I see the background I just
[22:25] they want to make a promise and read
[22:26] something and I like H so oh I did have
[22:29] one more question Patrick so the other
[22:31] thing I though uh question that I had
[22:33] was um whether they would be also
[22:35] responsible for taking reservations for
[22:37] how that would handle be handled in
[22:39] terms of you know not putting something
[22:43] they're assum they're assuming the whole
[22:44] responsibility for it
[22:47] so yes Mr um so uh I know it was Tuesday
[22:51] or Wednesday at the golf course I saw
[22:53] arpad of bolts in the they're back there
[22:56] by the by the sheds and I got thinking
[22:58] of how much fun they were um when my
[23:00] girls were little we'd always take the
[23:02] paddle boats out Tuesday in the park the
[23:04] fireworks so and there there were there
[23:06] were constantly people on on the pond on
[23:09] aoy Lake yeah with paddle boats I think
[23:11] it's a good thing and without any
[23:13] obligation or cost to us so I do in
[23:15] favor of whatever you could put for and
[23:18] if not to cast any aspersions over it
[23:20] but if the council did consider it by an
[23:22] animous consent Monday night they would
[23:25] probably extend that discount for the
[23:27] rides that's granted the council
[23:28] president all the
[23:30] council this is getting better not
[23:33] taking any discounts I'll be in the
[23:41] paper yeah I don't have a problem I mean
[23:43] getting all the documents some this to
[23:45] un consent part let me see if we can get
[23:48] a package together it's or now it's
[23:51] conceptual it sounds good
[23:53] but we all know the devils in the
[23:55] details and we have another council
[23:57] member who's not here so that would mean
[23:59] that everybody be up to be on board so
[24:01] the sooner the better I know Mr um lefon
[24:04] said he just kind of like there wasn't a
[24:06] real they just approached them there was
[24:08] nothing really hammered out yet so it
[24:10] wouldn't matter to
[24:13] me and we can consider for youit content
[24:16] if we get all the
[24:18] documentation
[24:23] great okay uh the next item oh excuse me
[24:26] item yeah item two to the award been in
[24:28] contact with this connected police
[24:30] locker and toilet room Renovations Mr
[24:33] Wallen uh last session I came to you
[24:36] with the award of three contracts for
[24:38] the renovations sity police toilet and
[24:40] locker room uh they were the mechanical
[24:42] the electrical and the um General we did
[24:46] not have a plumbing at the time as we
[24:47] did not have anyone um put in actually
[24:50] we had a plumbing not a mechanical so we
[24:52] had to rebid the mechanical portion of
[24:54] it fourth uh we did reach out to some
[24:56] firms we did get uh a bid on it from eer
[25:00] mechanical uh e mechanical um they seem
[25:03] to be aggressively pursuing working in
[25:05] the city they were also N Low on our
[25:07] fire station and hbac maintenance
[25:10] contracts so uh they have an idea of the
[25:13] buildings and um we're comfortable
[25:16] moving forward with it and this would be
[25:17] our fourth contractor so that we can
[25:19] move forward with the project as a whole
[25:22] questions or comments entertain a motion
[25:25] so second all those in favor thank you
[25:28] item number three is being closed at the
[25:30] request of Mr Wallen item number four to
[25:32] authorize the issuance of vote permit
[25:35] number 683 to MTX group yep uh we've
[25:38] seen this one before um but working with
[25:40] the law Department we discovered some
[25:42] discrepancies but we want to make sure
[25:43] is going forward that the applicant's
[25:45] information is on the permanent not the
[25:48] um installer of the sign so we went back
[25:51] and we clarified that and we had them
[25:53] add it we also had them uh add an email
[25:57] that the certificate owner for the
[25:59] insurance is going to be the property
[26:00] owner which is uh scoa Holdings so now
[26:03] that we have that documented we'd like
[26:05] to um officially um issue the
[26:09] revocable this is we didn't issue the
[26:12] revocable correct Maxi before so this is
[26:14] now the official issuance of it we'll
[26:16] just act like we
[26:18] never for 683 683 wasn't issue before
[26:22] correct so we're going to move forward
[26:24] now this is the insurance okay questions
[26:27] or comments and a motion second all in
[26:32] favor all right uh item number five the
[26:35] issue authorization of issuance of a
[26:37] vocable commit 684 to Maverick Quantum
[26:39] Inc so uh same building simar shine same
[26:45] Insurance holder different um company in
[26:47] the building and same thing we had them
[26:50] uh reapply for the correct applicant
[26:52] information and signature of the
[26:54] applicant not signature of the sign
[26:55] company and that would be the standard
[26:57] going forward when we do with vocables
[26:59] to make sure that um usually it's like
[27:02] an AJ sign they're very familiar we work
[27:04] with them and they'll fill it out on
[27:05] behalf but we would like to now see the
[27:08] applicate signature and the applicant's
[27:10] information and not do it as on behalf
[27:12] of Mak sense questions or comments out a
[27:16] motion so second all those in
[27:19] favor thank you very
[27:21] much uh item number six is discussion
[27:25] seeker and Planning Commission
[27:27] recommendation regarding the addition of
[27:28] Section
[27:30] 26411 3 of connected city code regarding
[27:33] the regulation and location of smoke
[27:35] shops vape shops hook and VAP
[27:37] consumption businesses there was a
[27:39] public hearing that was held on April
[27:40] 22nd 2024 Mr
[27:45] barage um yeah I'll take
[27:47] this President um I think Jack Conelly
[27:51] from the planning department is here as
[27:54] well um as you know this was the public
[27:57] hearing was held about a month ago um
[27:59] it's part of the legislative process
[28:01] we've been staff has been looking at the
[28:03] proposed uh ordinance and uh has some
[28:07] changes that need to be you know need
[28:10] recommending to the proposed ordinance
[28:12] and also giving you a way ahead here as
[28:15] far as the
[28:16] process um if as U Mr cin would go
[28:20] through it in just a moment regarding
[28:22] the the changes to the proposed
[28:24] ordinance but since we're amending the zoning code this this needs to be
[28:28] referred up to the County Planning
[28:30] Department so if the changes as uh
[28:36] discussed if there's changes to it then
[28:38] the final draft you can transmit up to
[28:41] the county on Monday via a resolution
[28:45] saying that the proposed Vape ordinance
[28:47] is attached for County's review and
[28:51] pursuing to the state of law they have
[28:52] 30 days in which to do the
[28:55] review because as you all know the the
[28:57] more a atorium is coming up and expiring
[29:00] in June pursuing to that then we need to
[29:02] do a public hearing um prior to the
[29:06] extension of that for another uh 3
[29:09] months so um I would recommend that the
[29:14] council pass a uh resolution calling for
[29:17] a public hearing on for next week for
[29:20] the 10th if it's necessary to extend
[29:24] that
[29:25] moratorium obviously it depends on what
[29:28] you all do here tonight as far as
[29:30] changing you know the the draft and then
[29:33] subject to the County Planning
[29:35] Department's review and
[29:38] recommendations so that's the process
[29:42] the big picture and Mr con will go
[29:44] through some of the uh Provisions that
[29:47] uh staff has been going through so the
[29:50] first provision is pretty brief um in
[29:51] section B location uh the only thing
[29:54] that need to Chang is are to is not
[29:56] included as one of the Z districts that
[29:58] these will be prohibited in all the
[30:00] other residential districts as long as
[30:01] C1 2 3 and the I districts were included
[30:04] C1 area R2 was just an oversight that
[30:06] was not included um obviously I'm sure
[30:09] we can all agree we'd like to see that
[30:10] in there um the second ones the rest of
[30:14] them are a little bit bigger we want to
[30:16] change some of the radiuses um and I can
[30:18] go through why we want to do that as
[30:19] well um so in the next section c
[30:22] restriction on location of H vate BR
[30:24] smoke Andor vape shops um we decided to
[30:29] take out paragraph 1 um in regards to
[30:32] the radius regarding um residential uses
[30:36] uh originally there was a th000 ft
[30:38] radius in any residental in any
[30:40] industrial Zone that was near uh within
[30:42] 1,000 ft of a residential district the
[30:44] reason we decided to get rid of that is
[30:46] because the majority of our uh
[30:48] industrial districts are very small to
[30:50] begin with um and pretty much all of
[30:52] them have hes that are within 1,000 ft
[30:55] of residential districts so I I pulled
[30:58] the data
[30:59] earlier uh M1 and M2 districts which is
[31:02] which are our industrial manufacturing
[31:04] districts are only about 11% of the of
[31:07] the area of the city um to begin with
[31:09] and the vast majority of those Parcels
[31:11] that lie within those districts are
[31:14] within the you know within the radius of
[31:16] the residential so we'd effectively be
[31:18] banning them from nearly all of the
[31:20] industrial districts regard uh If This
[31:22] Were to be enacted um given the fact
[31:25] that the industrial is obviously very
[31:27] clear and separate from the residential
[31:29] um we didn't see that as necessary the
[31:32] other reasons why we didn't see it as
[31:33] necessary go with the next two items um
[31:37] first of all there's going to be we
[31:39] wanted to keep up the 1000 ft radius
[31:42] with similar uses meaning if there's a
[31:45] one smoke shop in that region that you
[31:47] can't have another one within 1,000 ft
[31:49] therefore if you have one in an M1
[31:51] District unless things are very
[31:53] perfectly situated which you're not
[31:56] going to have a second in that
[31:57] Industrial distri
[31:58] um meaning there's only going to be one
[32:01] per District close to Res relatively
[32:04] close to residential I should say it's
[32:05] not even going to be near residential um
[32:08] but because of that we're going to
[32:09] severely decrease the amount the density
[32:12] of the smoke shops um there the last
[32:14] thing in number
[32:17] three um we wanted to switch it from
[32:20] 2,000 ft to 750 ft away from schools the
[32:24] reason for that is again similar to what
[32:28] I was saying before these are already
[32:30] being
[32:31] severely limited um 2,000 ft from as
[32:34] it's currently listed right now would
[32:37] effectively REM limit it completely um
[32:41] and and it would effectively make it so
[32:43] you cannot open one of these shops which
[32:45] I understand is part of the purpose of
[32:47] the moratorium however you know we need
[32:49] to allow for some uses of it we can't
[32:51] outright ban it completely um so the
[32:53] goal was to get a 750 ft away from
[32:56] schools um most of which are already
[32:58] located in residential districts that
[33:00] wouldn't
[33:01] have any any use for this anyway there
[33:04] are a few schools that I have listed
[33:06] that that would be affected and that
[33:07] would take that would uh eliminate some
[33:09] of those business and Industrial
[33:11] districts from uh consideration but for
[33:14] the most part it would stay relatively
[33:16] similar to how it is um again the
[33:20] purposes written as it is um with the changes that I just detailed we
[33:24] would still be severely limiting the the
[33:27] smoke shops um but it would make it a
[33:30] bit more accessible for them with that
[33:31] was still making it completely uh
[33:33] restricted for for our
[33:35] purposes and just to follow on on Mr K's
[33:39] comments uh regarding section two
[33:42] currently section two there would
[33:45] be a minor tweak there where would say
[33:48] uh legal hookah lounge uh smoke shot and
[33:51] vape lounge that's just added just to
[33:54] make it
[33:55] consistent and excuse me were you adding
[33:58] that language it would be under two it
[34:01] would be such legal Hooks and and vape
[34:05] bounds in the original draft the smoke
[34:09] shop was was deleted but was was not was
[34:12] omitted and should have been in there so
[34:14] that's just a corrective action okay and
[34:16] then uh Madam president as you know the
[34:20] council also got a a memo from the uh
[34:23] from the Planning Commission regarding
[34:25] uh this um while they didn't indicates
[34:29] a a uh a uh specific percentage of the
[34:34] floor area of a smoke shop Vape Shop
[34:37] hooker Lounge um they did indicate that
[34:41] it would be something some less than 40%
[34:47] which the current draft has and just uh some localities have gone down as far
[34:53] as
[34:54] 25% so I'm just giving you a range 25 to
[34:59] propos was was take ordinance that
[35:02] language was taken from the Town of
[35:04] Babylon so other localities have G to
[35:08] 25 so just giving the council a range of
[35:11] uh
[35:13] numbers um so you were there with a
[35:15] planning meeting do you want to talk
[35:17] about that please uh effectively what
[35:19] they said is they wanted to they thought
[35:20] 40% was too large of an area um because
[35:24] you can their their main concern is you
[35:26] could have 30 8% of the floor area be
[35:29] dedicated to smoking materials and then
[35:30] the rest just be filled with they call
[35:32] it fluff items um so technically it's
[35:35] not 40% of the floor area that's that's
[35:37] we smoking um and they can be legally
[35:39] operating but it would effectively be
[35:40] operating as a smoke shop so that's why
[35:42] they wanted that threshold uh lowered as Mr BR said they don't have a specific
[35:46] number they wanted it something closer
[35:48] to how a sparts operates um with you
[35:51] know smoking products in the back and
[35:54] speaking with uh Christine perano
[35:55] upstairs we thought I mean clearly
[35:58] stewards is not a smoke shop um so we
[36:00] wanted it a bit more than that 25% in
[36:03] our estimation seemed like a fair number
[36:05] um as Mr BR said we got that was similar
[36:08] to other municipalities in the
[36:14] area so um my my only concern with that
[36:18] is that smoke shops that's all they have
[36:20] is so um it's not like STS where they
[36:23] have ice cream and cigarettes smoke
[36:25] shops that's that's all they have so
[36:28] um I'm not sure if we I'm not saying
[36:30] that we shouldn't lower it I just don't
[36:32] want to make it so restrictive that
[36:35] there we're essentially trying to tell
[36:36] them they just can't have their products
[36:38] um advertised not I don't both CHS but I
[36:42] think we need to be fair and how we U
[36:44] put this legislation together I think
[36:45] that's fair yeah they uh the reason they
[36:47] brought it up is there was a uh was a
[36:50] convenience store opening up and when
[36:51] they found out that it could be up to
[36:53] 40% they found that it would they were
[36:55] effectively going to operate as a smoke
[36:56] shop based on the conversation that was
[36:58] had in the Planning Commission meeting
[36:59] with with that applicant um so that
[37:02] that's what spurred their
[37:07] recommendation yes Mr Tor I did notice
[37:09] one um convenience store that that did
[37:12] um advertise as a smoke shop on half of
[37:15] the store that smoke shop sign came down
[37:18] so um I know there's been some um
[37:20] enforcement out there as well so and it wasn't on our list of even legal
[37:25] smoke shops so yeah off officers put a
[37:28] lot of effort into restricting the
[37:32] sence Mr WS so I had one question
[37:35] and just not really sitting that well
[37:39] with me in the section c uh
[37:42] reducing the uh the the property around
[37:44] schools from
[37:47] 2750 as you as you mentioned just
[37:49] referencing just the intent with which
[37:51] this was presented to the to the council
[37:53] in 2008 says this ordinance this
[37:56] ordinance is an athet regul land use and
[37:58] to protect health and safety and the
[37:59] welfare of our community pursuant can
[38:01] you just speak to the reasoning behind a
[38:05] identifying 2,000 as an appropriate
[38:06] measure and I understood what you
[38:08] speaking towards of reducing that to 750
[38:11] so you're saying why was 2,000
[38:12] originally considered 2000 was that was
[38:14] the model that we used that was out of
[38:16] the Town of Babylon that's where the
[38:18] figure 2000 came from so upon further
[38:21] review that's where we're we're looking
[38:23] at now taking that those feet and
[38:26] looking at the zoning map and where
[38:28] these location where these these shops
[38:30] are going to go and then regarding the
[38:34] 750 you Al that that would really just
[38:38] affect the the commercial districts in
[38:40] C4 and C5 is that pretty much there so I
[38:44] went through all the schools in the city
[38:46] um there are a couple that come within
[38:49] 750 ft of this as I said most schools
[38:51] wouldn't be affected by this anyway
[38:53] because they're in primarily residential
[38:54] districts there would be a few schools
[38:56] that earn that 7 50 foot buffer um
[39:00] effectively what it would be looking
[39:01] like is this a majority of our
[39:03] industrial districts which I said after
[39:05] these things are about 10% of our our
[39:08] city would be able to have smoke shops
[39:10] as as a freight if they have one there
[39:12] can't be another within 1,000 ft M it
[39:14] would be severely limiting there C4 and
[39:16] C5 which is downtown in our business
[39:18] districts it would be special use permit
[39:20] again with the same rules applying with
[39:21] 1,000 ft um what that allows the
[39:25] Planning Commission to do is have a lot
[39:26] more leeway over what's allowed so even
[39:29] though you might come into issues where
[39:31] you know it's near residential areas
[39:34] that are technically C4 um the Planning
[39:37] Commission has the authority to view
[39:39] that as a whole and take that into
[39:40] consideration when passing approvals and
[39:43] just okay would you be able to provide
[39:45] us a listing of those schools that might
[39:46] potentially be affected absolutely thank
[39:48] you and just following on Mr K's remark
[39:51] regarding the special use permit um the
[39:54] uh section 2649
[39:57] 9 subb of of the code says the proposed
[40:00] building that would be the Vape chop or
[40:03] use will not have a substantial undo
[40:05] adverse effecta on adjacent property the
[40:08] character of the neighborhood traffic
[40:10] conditions parking uh utility facilities
[40:13] and other matters affecting public
[40:15] health safety and general welfare so
[40:18] those even though you're decreasing that
[40:20] as far as the special use permit the
[40:22] Planning Commission has to factor those
[40:25] uh uh items into their decision and just
[40:29] as a sort of a a standpoint right now I did the analysis for this obviously
[40:33] this building would never be a smoke
[40:34] shop let's hope um but a 500t radius
[40:37] from here would take you down to
[40:39] Broadway to Union Street and State
[40:41] Street so in 1,000ft radius would you
[40:43] know be twice that size so so having one
[40:46] smoke shop there is going to severely
[40:48] impact the rest of that neighborhood and
[40:49] make it clear if any
[40:53] others did you have hand up um that was
[40:56] good clarified point I I mean I was
[40:58] questioning the 750 as well and how we
[41:00] got to that lower number from 2000 so
[41:04] and also wasn't sure why you know we
[41:06] just didn't say a thousand since we were
[41:08] you know using a thousand as the marker
[41:11] in the other in in the other bullet um
[41:15] but cuz I mean my concern is having them
[41:18] close to schools we don't want them
[41:20] close to schools um
[41:22] so you know but sounds like that's a
[41:26] good enough distance
[41:28] we felt as if it was we spent a lot of
[41:29] time talking about it um 750 we thought
[41:32] was a was a fair number um and like I
[41:34] said I looked at all the schools the the
[41:37] ones that would be affected are still
[41:38] going to be you know a decent amount
[41:40] away from the industrial districts and
[41:41] again that's only also if things are
[41:45] perfectly placed to be as close as
[41:46] possible if there's one on the farther
[41:48] end of the industrial district that's
[41:50] closer to a th000 or more feet away from
[41:52] the school that's going to make it so
[41:53] there's nothing else that can get even
[41:54] remotely close
[41:59] so these are for the um like people that
[42:01] are goinging to be applying so for the
[42:04] existing VAP the existing legal vape and
[42:07] smoke shops um these those will be taken
[42:10] into account when you when somebody else
[42:12] is trying to locate so those would take
[42:14] into account let me pull up or something
[42:17] it's
[42:18] on section one
[42:21] um those businesses according to this
[42:24] legislation would be would cease to
[42:26] exist after 1 year um of the city
[42:29] council adopting the legislation now if
[42:31] they are in an industrial district
[42:33] already they can apply for site plan
[42:36] approval again if they are in a c4 C5
[42:39] District they can apply for a special
[42:40] use permit um if they are in another
[42:43] District as I I know one of the main
[42:45] problem areas is Upper Union Street
[42:46] which is C2 they could apply for a use
[42:49] variant um which at the last page
[42:51] details that it could be granted if they
[42:53] showed that they have not received
[42:55] Financial
[42:57] you know the proper financial
[43:00] repercussions for opening the business
[43:02] in the first place and the use variants
[43:04] would only be good until they get their
[43:06] finances in order once they you know get
[43:09] a return on their investment then the
[43:11] business would cease to exist again and
[43:13] could not reopen again unless there was
[43:15] a used variance granted which would be
[43:16] unlikely
[43:21] mhm I I don't know telling people
[43:24] they're going to do their business in
[43:25] the year I'm not sure that
[43:27] [Music]
[43:28] I'm not 100% but they they would have
[43:30] the ability to go before the zoning
[43:32] board of appeals and make their case as
[43:34] to why they should stay you know
[43:36] additional because of huiz of their costs so the idea is to
[43:44] um to allow the business
[43:48] to recoup their Investments past that
[43:52] onee deadline and this wasn't anything
[43:54] that changed from the last time it was
[43:56] here either that something the in the in
[43:59] the original
[44:05] draft
[44:06] Yeah do do we know how many existing
[44:11] shops that will impact I don't have a
[44:14] number for
[44:15] you that would be
[44:23] important would you be able to provide
[44:25] us with that information I could provide
[44:26] you with rough with a rough number at I
[44:28] you know getting an exact one would be
[44:30] near possible we could look
[44:34] [Music]
[44:37] it Adam president just for you know as
[44:40] followup from my earlier comments just
[44:42] for you know the way
[44:43] ahead if um based on Mr Conley's
[44:47] comments and the other comments uh if
[44:50] you want to move forward with this you
[44:54] could amend it as we've just discussed
[44:57] mhm um and we'll put it on the agenda
[45:00] for Monday and that will have a cover
[45:05] resolution for transmitt up to the
[45:08] County Planning Department for their
[45:09] comment and review and then subject to
[45:13] their comments then uh it would it would
[45:16] come back before the council for for for
[45:20] final action or any any other amendments
[45:23] based on the there there be an
[45:25] opportunity to amend after we find
[45:27] oh yeah oh yeah oh yeah and uh so if but
[45:32] I would I think what we're looking to do
[45:34] is move move this forward so the county
[45:37] has something to look at from us a final
[45:39] draft if you will and then and then uh
[45:43] have that process move forward and as I
[45:46] indicated earlier also have a resolution
[45:49] calling for a public hearing extending M
[45:52] moratorium has that June 10th today so
[45:54] we're keeping everything along okay so
[45:58] that so I just have one other I have one
[46:00] other question under item c number uh
[46:04] number four where the about the window
[46:06] coverage of the 20% and all those so are
[46:09] these are these numbers according to the
[46:11] um I know there's some sep head gu
[46:13] guidelines these These are actually out
[46:15] of the the signage wage you see there is
[46:18] out of the city of
[46:20] Buffalo's uh ordinance dealing with Vape
[46:24] Shops and and and the uh so that's where
[46:26] that leg that's where those numbers can
[46:28] and 20% is in our city code for all
[46:30] businesses it is for bus for all
[46:32] businesses so that's it's restating
[46:34] what's already was already okay I'm that
[46:36] is part of the
[46:38] subra just want to make sure we're kind
[46:40] of be
[46:42] consistent okay mad president sir mayor
[46:46] just I referen Monday and Mr O'Brien
[46:49] reference Monday it's actually
[46:53] Tuesday not that we don't all look
[46:54] forward to getting together on Monday
[46:56] and Tuesday
[46:57] on
[46:58] Tuesday absolutely so m p um I mean I
[47:03] would like to move this forward so that
[47:04] it can go to the county however um I
[47:07] think the uh 25% piece needs to be
[47:10] discussed um the recommendation of the
[47:13] planing commission for
[47:16] Section section
[47:21] two
[47:23] a 22 a yeah yeah under the uh definition
[47:29] section of uh the substantial or
[47:32] significant portion that goes through
[47:35] it's a b c and d uh the 40% came from
[47:40] the kind of babylon's code um other as
[47:44] Mr Colin said in in my Research
[47:47] indicates other locations have gone down
[47:49] to
[47:50] 25% so that gives you a range that gives
[47:52] the council a range to to work from MH
[47:57] you can keep it at 40 or you can go down
[47:58] to 25 or anything in between I mean it's
[48:01] really up to you you feel comfortable
[48:04] with it's just there's other as you in
[48:07] that portion there other factors you
[48:09] know how they
[48:10] Define or described the operation of the
[48:13] business so this is just
[48:17] really narrowing and further so the um
[48:21] Planning Commission recommends we lower
[48:23] it just hasn't hasn't given a
[48:25] recommendation as to what we lower too
[48:27] they didn't give a specific number they
[48:29] didn't have specific numbers on hand and
[48:30] didn't want to throw stuff around
[48:32] willy-nilly without you
[48:37] knower
[48:39] um discussion
[48:42] [Music]
[48:45] Council and again we're you know this we
[48:47] can send this to the county and if then
[48:49] we want to have more discussion or amend
[48:51] it um maybe have some conversations with
[48:54] the Planning Commission in terms of what
[48:56] they're thinking because the memo that
[48:57] they said doesn't really give a lot of
[48:59] detail right okay so um have that
[49:02] discussion and we could possibly change
[49:05] it then or leave it as
[49:08] is I mean if it's council's wish they you can put it up you can move it
[49:13] forward with 40% then change it again
[49:16] change it if you wish at you know when
[49:19] you read get the comments from the from
[49:21] the county were were amended in the
[49:24] final Amendment form lower
[49:27] mayor and the reality in these type of
[49:30] things are you're going to get people
[49:31] whatever number you pick and they're
[49:33] going to be compliant there's also going
[49:35] to be other people who will
[49:38] be uh crafty clever
[49:42] uh interesting in their design of their
[49:45] floor space you know what's common area
[49:48] what's a walkway what's
[49:50] actual retail and so the wording there
[49:55] howy have something has some kind of
[49:56] sense that's enforceable and that we
[50:00] want to be able to just manage it going
[50:02] [Music]
[50:10] forward anyone else okay um I mean I I I
[50:15] think reducing it is the way to go just
[50:18] based on everything we've been hearing
[50:19] from for example the
[50:21] um New York State toac Council
[50:27] if the council chose a low
[50:31] number is there a process where somebody
[50:34] go to the zoning board of appeals or do
[50:36] something where they had some unique set
[50:39] of circumstances where they would then
[50:40] have to
[50:42] justify having additional space no no
[50:47] it's it's it's it's it's from an
[50:48] enforcement point of view as far as
[50:51] what's your floor space what you got in
[50:53] there as your inventory and product for
[50:55] sale and it's way for the the zoning
[50:58] inspector or the code enforcement person
[51:00] to take a look make a make an assessment
[51:03] on the floor space inventory what's this
[51:05] business all
[51:06] about
[51:09] and um
[51:12] 40% substantial or significant it's 25%
[51:15] you know 25% is
[51:18] that significant or
[51:21] substantial um like I said some
[51:24] localities have gone down to 25% so
[51:29] um
[51:31] it's there's other factors that they
[51:33] consider revenues dered advertising Etc
[51:37] that that an inspector can can use but
[51:40] it's just further defining the the the
[51:44] uh the uh enforcement mechanism of
[51:48] what's what's in that particular
[51:51] store Mr Toro um having visited several
[51:54] of them I mean it's the same they have
[51:58] the same product store after store after
[52:00] store I would say more than 40% of their
[52:03] floor is dedicated to vape and smoka and
[52:06] paraphernalia and things like that so um
[52:09] 40 and I mean 40 would I think a lot of
[52:13] the stores I've been in would reduce
[52:15] their inventory as it is now uh 25%
[52:19] would even reduce it further um so again
[52:24] I'd like to hear what um you know what
[52:26] the Planning Commission recommends I can
[52:28] see lowering it a little bit but the I
[52:31] think the 25% would really limit what
[52:33] they have in their shop and if we're
[52:35] allowing their shops to be there then
[52:38] they should at least be able to kind of
[52:40] sell what they have I guess I 40% was a
[52:43] number originally that was agreed upon
[52:45] between the department of development
[52:46] and the law office so that that was a
[52:48] number that we took from a couple
[52:49] different spots and and looked at um the
[52:53] Planning Commission just agreed
[52:57] so um I think we can move this forward
[52:59] but we'd have to I still would like to
[53:00] hear from the Planning Commission what
[53:02] their um rationale was for that and we
[53:04] could get that before um before it's
[53:07] time to actually um within 30 days that
[53:10] the council that the county would have
[53:12] to send it back um I have to agree with
[53:14] mror I think that we don't want to limit
[53:16] it really too much so we're just
[53:18] basically not giving people an
[53:19] opportunity to run their business Mr you
[53:23] suggested moving forward in
[53:25] 40% but that and amend it when we
[53:28] receive the recommendation from the
[53:29] county
[53:31] exactly I'm good with that and okay also
[53:34] Mr umbrian you want us to also move
[53:37] ahead with the to call for a public
[53:39] hearing for the extension of the more
[53:42] 20 so first should we U Move This
[53:45] forward to the count do we have to move
[53:47] this in a resolution to the county with
[53:50] but and then do a second resolution um Madam president just so
[53:56] I'm I'm tracking the changes here so
[53:58] we're all on the same page so for
[54:01] location we're adding uh R2 that's corrective action residential
[54:06] area
[54:07] R2 we're deleting in the section calling
[54:12] for restrictions on location of hookah
[54:14] lounges Vape lounges Etc we're deleting
[54:18] one SE paragraph two would then become
[54:22] paragraph one and paragraph three would
[54:25] become paragraph two with the location
[54:28] change to
[54:29] 750 750
[54:31] ft and that you would remain at this
[54:34] point 40% regarding the definition
[54:38] portions that substantial or significant
[54:40] portion is that is that
[54:42] correct you would leave that at 40% at
[54:45] this point but this is so I'll amend as
[54:51] discussed and then um and then prepare
[54:54] the resolution as the cover
[54:56] resolution for the draft to go up to the
[55:00] county yes
[55:03] okay yeah we need to move yes we need to
[55:06] move that so move as this disc okay
[55:10] second all those in favor I okay now we
[55:13] need a motion to um call for a public
[55:16] hearing to discuss if needed the
[55:18] extension on the
[55:19] moratorium so second all those in
[55:24] favor one final matter on this whole
[55:27] packet Madam president there was a
[55:29] Seeker I think that a Seeker resolution
[55:32] declaring this as a non type two action
[55:35] I think we should just wait on that
[55:37] until we get the final product of the uh
[55:42] ordinance ready to go and use that as a
[55:43] companion piece of legislation once for
[55:46] the final
[55:49] okay anything else Mr thank you okay
[55:53] thank you all right um
[55:57] item number
[55:58] seven threeyear home Consortium
[56:01] agreement R the city of troit in town
[56:03] Miss
[56:04] Carver good evening our sced Detroit
[56:08] Colony Consortium agreement is up for
[56:10] Renewal we renew it every 3 years
[56:13] roughly each year we get a million
[56:15] dollar in Home Federal funding that's
[56:17] allocated with connect being a leite
[56:20] entity part of this renewal process is
[56:22] that we need to do a resolution stating
[56:25] just that we're the lead entity and we're
[56:29] approving the renewal of the home
[56:30] Consortium agreement for another three
[56:32] years my recommendation today which I
[56:34] did Supply um for your review the last
[56:37] resolution that we did is that we passed
[56:40] another threeyear Ral for the home
[56:41] consor agreement any questions or
[56:44] comments move it second all those in
[56:47] favor I thank you um the next one is our
[56:51] Pro housing communities pledge
[56:53] resolution Miss par yes to governor 2023
[56:57] executive order um has some designated
[57:00] funds that some discretionary funds that
[57:02] we would have access to if we get the
[57:05] pro housing community designation part
[57:08] of that process to get that is to pass
[57:11] the community housing Pro housing
[57:13] community pledge resolution I do need to
[57:15] supply the exact wording to you for
[57:17] review which I do have to make sure that
[57:19] we're aign um by passing this resolution
[57:21] we are agreeing to things that we
[57:23] already do one streamlining and
[57:25] permitting from multif family housing
[57:27] affordable housing units accessibility
[57:29] and Supportive Housing that we're going
[57:31] to adopt policies that affirmatively
[57:33] further fair housing incorporate
[57:35] Regional Housing needs into our planning
[57:37] decisions and increase development
[57:39] capacity for residential uses so today
[57:42] um the A is for city council to do a um
[57:46] resolution adopting the pro housing
[57:48] communities
[57:50] pledge so um Mrs Carver will provide us
[57:52] with that information but if uh everyone
[57:54] is comfortable p that information we can
[57:56] move it now and if there's any question
[57:58] of course we can um remove it if
[58:00] necessary but I'll entertain a motion to
[58:02] do so second all those in favor I thank
[58:06] you very
[58:07] much okay so quickly uh item number nine
[58:11] is um I'm asking for a ceremonial
[58:13] resolution recognizing spal Zulus and
[58:15] Steve Harris for their years of service
[58:18] at woodlon Park um they spent 133 years
[58:21] revitalizing that Park SPO is now moving
[58:24] away and Steve just felt like he
[58:25] couldn't carried on on his own so just
[58:28] want to the council to recognize the
[58:29] work that they put into the city
[58:31] park second all those in
[58:34] favor uh the next item is a ceremony
[58:37] resolution recognizing National
[58:38] Caribbean American Heritage Month Mr M
[58:41] Baron thank you June is recognized as
[58:44] National Caribbean heritage month and I
[58:46] once again asking for resolution to
[58:48] recognize the Caribbean
[58:50] American contribution to our city andal
[58:54] reg I'll move it
[58:56] second all those in favor
[58:59] hi okay item number 11 is a proposed
[59:04] changing um proposed zoning change for
[59:06] this SKC 40 project um I'll turn that
[59:10] over to the
[59:11] mayor thank you uh mam
[59:14] president we've been fortunate done a
[59:17] number of major announcements recently
[59:19] on projects in the city uh this item
[59:23] coming before you tonight I want to
[59:25] thank
[59:27] uh the landbank team ecni Community
[59:31] Builders developers
[59:33] Metroplex it will
[59:36] have as big an impact or more than some
[59:40] of the other things that have we've
[59:42] announced and are getting bigger
[59:45] headlines but it's going to clean up a
[59:47] lot of blight within the area it's going
[59:49] to create housing opportunities and
[59:51] hopefully just continue the level of
[59:53] excitement that we have on community on
[59:55] this Community where people are making
[59:57] Investments here and that they'll be
[59:59] able to take advantage of your
[1:00:01] moratorium on the price structure Mr
[1:00:03] here but with that I turn it over to Mr
[1:00:06] Gillan from uh Metroplex to go through
[1:00:09] the uh proposal and the request we thank
[1:00:13] the council it should be we thank the
[1:00:17] council president for uh having us
[1:00:19] tonight and for all of you for being
[1:00:21] here I want to introduce Steve strikman
[1:00:23] from our land bank love having backing
[1:00:26] on our team s bua from Five Corners
[1:00:29] development very involved in this
[1:00:31] project Andy brick our legal
[1:00:34] counsel Courtney Davis from LaBella
[1:00:38] Associates and yon Thompson from
[1:00:40] Community Builders who's already done so
[1:00:42] much good work on the Aly Street
[1:00:44] Corridor as the mayor said we're very
[1:00:46] pleased to bring this forward this me
[1:00:49] this is really we're riding on the
[1:00:51] coattails of the great work done by the
[1:00:54] legal team and the codes team here in
[1:00:56] the city and the mayor and everyone in
[1:00:58] this room to uh it kind of reminds me of
[1:01:02] the wedgeway building we went after our
[1:01:04] bad owner there we're able to collect a
[1:01:08] huge fine get the building transferred
[1:01:10] to a new owner we have a $20 million
[1:01:12] project under way there with the help of
[1:01:14] the restore theor program we want to do
[1:01:16] the same here so first and foremost
[1:01:18] though the cod's team the Leal Team Max
[1:01:20] has been spectacular on this and she
[1:01:22] joined the city team uh won a judgment
[1:01:25] against the owner of this connected 40
[1:01:27] properties of $760,000 that's the
[1:01:30] biggest fine in the history of the city
[1:01:32] as I understand it again I have nothing
[1:01:34] to do with it I wish I could take credit
[1:01:36] for it this it's so spectacular but I
[1:01:38] can't and um with this so you not only
[1:01:42] are you going to get $760,000 to put in
[1:01:44] your budget but we're going to get these
[1:01:46] blighted properties cleaned up which is
[1:01:48] just so exciting and you see a couple
[1:01:50] pictures there just go back to me if you
[1:01:52] can the one building I've talked to the
[1:01:54] council president on this upper left
[1:01:56] many many times it's it's burned out
[1:01:58] it's a disaster um you know you look at
[1:02:01] the interior conditions of some of these
[1:02:03] buildings along the Albany Street
[1:02:04] quarter so it's it's really exciting
[1:02:07] that uh this this judgment was levied uh
[1:02:10] and now we're moving forward the plan to
[1:02:12] clean up the pl
[1:02:14] sites in addition this all of those
[1:02:17] buildings are along the Aly Street
[1:02:19] quarter adjacent to that Al Street
[1:02:21] quarter of course is the Mohawk Honda
[1:02:23] site which our partners at the county
[1:02:25] agreed to buy and have closed on
[1:02:27] purchased it for $980,000 and the county
[1:02:31] has dedicated as you all know $3 million
[1:02:33] to develop that site of arpa funding to
[1:02:35] develop a grocery store at that site so
[1:02:37] we've got all of this potential uh good
[1:02:40] things happening on Aly Street and of
[1:02:42] course the um Monda site is right next
[1:02:46] to one of the great things about this
[1:02:48] site it fronts both on Aly Street and on
[1:02:50] State
[1:02:51] Street next
[1:02:54] slide when we looked at
[1:02:57] developing uh the Monda site for um
[1:03:02] retail and for new development it
[1:03:05] quickly became apparent that you
[1:03:06] couldn't do one project without the
[1:03:08] other you had to run these projects in
[1:03:10] tandem I didn't think of this I wasn't
[1:03:12] smart enough but our team is is very
[1:03:14] smart so they said You' got to run these
[1:03:16] in tandem when we started showing the
[1:03:18] Mohawk Honda site to to developers and
[1:03:20] to uh interested retailers they said
[1:03:23] what about all this BL on ay street
[1:03:25] right next to s so you have to do them
[1:03:26] in Tandem and that's why we're here to
[1:03:28] talk about tonight we're moving them
[1:03:30] forward at the same time we've put
[1:03:32] together a great team commity Builders
[1:03:34] Five Corners development Better
[1:03:36] Community neighborhoods uh the
[1:03:37] consultant team is very strong from our
[1:03:40] environmental experts to CT mail laella
[1:03:43] Andy brick Law Firm Jackson Demolition
[1:03:46] and of course Metroplex of the
[1:03:49] land this team has been very busy uh
[1:03:53] over the last uh 6 to8 months surveys
[1:03:56] have been completed phase one
[1:03:57] environmental reviews completed Phase 2
[1:04:00] is basically completed ongoing Geotech
[1:04:03] so we're testing the soil ongoing
[1:04:05] asbestos testing demolition budgets put
[1:04:08] together asbestos abatement is underway
[1:04:10] on these properties so we're getting
[1:04:12] ready to develop the site this is the
[1:04:14] same thing we did at the ALCO site this
[1:04:16] is the same thing we've done time and
[1:04:17] time again in this
[1:04:20] community again not only did the county
[1:04:22] buy Monda and get site control but we
[1:04:26] went after and again the city uh was
[1:04:28] super Cooperative on this uh we were
[1:04:31] awarded a $2.75 million Grant from the
[1:04:34] Restore New York program to demolish and
[1:04:36] clean up this site and prep it for
[1:04:38] development so we have that in hand so
[1:04:40] again it's a development momentum we
[1:04:41] have these properties on Aly street that
[1:04:43] are coming under control we have the M
[1:04:45] Honda side under control and now we have
[1:04:47] this grant to help prep the M Honda site
[1:04:50] for um development we're here tonight
[1:04:53] because you need to play a key role in
[1:04:55] moving this project before we want to
[1:04:57] rezone and this is critical for this
[1:04:59] project to go forward it's in a minor
[1:05:01] change there's four Parcels on sken
[1:05:04] street that are that need to be reson uh
[1:05:08] and there are three Parcels on Albany
[1:05:11] Street the four on all on sken street
[1:05:14] two are owned by Sora and they're in the
[1:05:16] process we're in the process of asking
[1:05:18] those to be turned over to the land bank
[1:05:21] the other two are part of this connected
[1:05:22] 40 the infamous connected 40 assemblage
[1:05:26] all of the properties on Albany Street
[1:05:27] are part of the uh uh the sk40
[1:05:31] assemblage so you see uh on the first
[1:05:34] Slide the current zoning see the red box
[1:05:37] um on SKC Street see the small red box
[1:05:40] on Aly street again four Parcels on
[1:05:42] skincity three on on Albany we move
[1:05:46] those into the green uh and um you can
[1:05:50] see that all the adjacent areas are
[1:05:52] already zoned uh you know as C4 so we're
[1:05:56] making a very minor change with three
[1:05:58] Parcels on ALB street that are part of
[1:06:00] the sked 40 assemblage four on connected
[1:06:04] Street what that allows us to do is move
[1:06:07] forward with the project uh site a is
[1:06:10] the Monda site to to demolish that
[1:06:13] building almost an 18,000 ft building
[1:06:16] clean it up remediate it site B there
[1:06:19] are 10 Parcels there very blighted those
[1:06:22] come down the buildings are unsafe Again
[1:06:24] part of theu 40 assemblage site C
[1:06:28] similar activity the parcels are cleaned
[1:06:31] up they're heavily damaged that's the
[1:06:33] fire damage parcel that you see in Aly
[1:06:35] street now it has to come down it's very blighted and and dilapidated site
[1:06:41] so we're able to clean up a lot of this
[1:06:43] bried Corridor on ALB Street and here's
[1:06:46] the good part uh what we are planning to
[1:06:49] do with this great development team
[1:06:51] we've put together is to build the new
[1:06:54] grocery store of 16 000 ft um in site
[1:06:59] a and build
[1:07:02] 125 housing units as well in site a in
[1:07:07] site B on the lower left uh 80 units
[1:07:11] site C 20 units so 225 units of new
[1:07:16] affordable high quality
[1:07:19] housing uh Fitness Center business
[1:07:21] center community indoor outdoor space
[1:07:24] you see all the green space on on the
[1:07:25] map there's a lot of green space in this
[1:07:27] project one of the things we talked to
[1:07:29] the council president about many times
[1:07:31] is having a very nice pathway from the
[1:07:35] grocery store back to Albany Street
[1:07:37] that's in the plan uh we have big buffer
[1:07:40] areas around underground parking uh uh
[1:07:44] you know first level parking of the
[1:07:46] apartment buildings being uh first floor
[1:07:48] parking so it's really a a very good
[1:07:51] site plan and uh we're excited to move
[1:07:54] it forward but we need to do this
[1:07:56] uh zoning change this minor zoning
[1:07:58] change in order to do this what does
[1:07:59] this get us more more quality housing
[1:08:02] removal of blighted and hazardous
[1:08:05] buildings uh continue the the uh
[1:08:07] development that we want to see in this
[1:08:10] quarter provide access to Transit
[1:08:12] provide walkable development and um a
[1:08:16] tree line sidewalks we talked to the to many of you about you're concerned
[1:08:20] that this be a walkable development have
[1:08:22] good sidewalks have good landscaping and
[1:08:25] really be a nice addition to our
[1:08:28] community of course one of the reasons
[1:08:30] we're doing this one of the drivers is
[1:08:32] to improve access to fresh food enhance
[1:08:36] food security improve quality of life
[1:08:38] and and the store will create 25 to 30
[1:08:40] new jobs as well so it's really a a very
[1:08:43] creative development taking those
[1:08:45] blighted buildings down that you won
[1:08:47] this big judgment against this notorious
[1:08:49] landlord who was um Breaking All the
[1:08:52] Rules uh getting us 760,00 ,000 getting
[1:08:57] those sites developed for quality
[1:08:58] affordable housing taking the site that
[1:09:00] the county purchased cleaning that up
[1:09:02] knocking the building down and
[1:09:04] developing it for
[1:09:06] grocery to move this forward that's what
[1:09:08] we're asking you to do declare your
[1:09:10] intent that you often do to be lead
[1:09:12] agency under Seeker which is required
[1:09:14] for any project like this make a
[1:09:17] referral to the Planning Commission uh
[1:09:19] the evening on the zoning change and
[1:09:22] they'll go through their usual process
[1:09:24] and call for a public hearing as
[1:09:27] well you see a couple of the skanky 40
[1:09:30] properties there um they're really
[1:09:32] blighted and um again they all get
[1:09:35] cleaned up uh with this project and we
[1:09:38] happy to answer any
[1:09:43] questions um so you talked about the
[1:09:45] grocery storees do you have has you
[1:09:47] identified who that grocery store we're
[1:09:49] under a non-disclosure right now but we
[1:09:51] have a letter int of intent uh in place
[1:09:54] we're working very diligently to
[1:09:56] complete that transaction okay could you
[1:09:59] give us a little bit information what
[1:10:01] the timeline might would look like would
[1:10:02] look like on this project the the
[1:10:04] timeline is is we move this ahead take
[1:10:08] the zone change to the Planning
[1:10:10] Commission uh it's critical to allow um
[1:10:15] uh this development to to move forward
[1:10:18] uh and again it builds on the momentum
[1:10:19] we've already seen on allby stre the
[1:10:21] community Builder Hillside Crossings
[1:10:23] project uh the Joe Allen
[1:10:25] apartments and um uh some of the other
[1:10:28] developments Hillside Crossing 2 um we
[1:10:32] then move into the uh development stage
[1:10:35] and bring the the project the building
[1:10:37] designs and and other uh features of the
[1:10:40] project back to the Planning Commission
[1:10:41] for final review and move the project
[1:10:45] forward overall do you know about and
[1:10:48] the time onine I'm not trying to like
[1:10:50] pin it down to the day we have been
[1:10:51] meeting weekly for longer than I want to
[1:10:54] tell you
[1:10:56] we have a call every Friday with this
[1:10:59] development team and we take notes and
[1:11:01] uh it is moving forward um I would say
[1:11:05] what would you think to me yeah Q2 Q3
[1:11:08] 2027 we would expect delivery so we
[1:11:11] we're hoping to have all HCR approvals
[1:11:14] by Q2 Q3 of this coming year and then
[1:11:17] it's about a roughly a two-year build oh
[1:11:20] okay the the key is getting the the
[1:11:23] sites prepped and cleaned up uh getting
[1:11:26] Monda cleaned up getting the building
[1:11:28] down we have the restore Grant in hand
[1:11:30] the developer the development team we
[1:11:33] put together has the financing to
[1:11:35] purchase these buildings from the
[1:11:37] receiver that's has been appointed by
[1:11:38] the courts to sell these properties so
[1:11:40] you get your $960,000 this
[1:11:47] year9 76 you got me all right and then
[1:11:52] uh so that happens the demolition of
[1:11:55] cond would happen this year the
[1:11:57] demolition of the sky 40 properties
[1:11:59] would happen this year hopefully this
[1:12:01] year yep and then we'll have cleaned up
[1:12:05] sites environmentally remediated like we
[1:12:07] did look at the you know the the corner
[1:12:09] of KRA all where we built that beautiful
[1:12:11] new housing and cleaned up you know a
[1:12:14] dry cleaner site that was very very
[1:12:16] dirty you know so all of those things
[1:12:18] take a little time but then we head into
[1:12:21] the development phase and the
[1:12:23] construction phase and it's a it's a very large exciting
[1:12:28] project as a mayor said this Rivals some
[1:12:30] of the larger developments that we've
[1:12:32] seen happen in this community uh as a
[1:12:34] result of our great partnership between
[1:12:36] the county and the city and our unified
[1:12:38] economic development team is it
[1:12:41] conceivable that the the store the
[1:12:43] grocery store will be open before all
[1:12:44] the apartments are completed or there
[1:12:47] like everything going if you want to if you wanted to add something to this
[1:12:50] you could join Mr Gillan up here because
[1:12:51] then you'd be on the cameras um is it
[1:12:54] conceivable that the grocery store would
[1:12:56] be open prior to that is it are you
[1:12:58] planning just everything kind of launch
[1:12:59] it at one time it's probably going to
[1:13:01] happen all at the same time just CU part
[1:13:03] of the funding from from the HCR is
[1:13:05] going to include funding for helping to
[1:13:07] support the grocery store okay so
[1:13:08] realistically speaking it would all be
[1:13:10] delivered around the same time I mean uh
[1:13:13] the Monda site is obviously going to be
[1:13:14] the first we're not necessarily phasing
[1:13:16] it but it's going to be the first to be
[1:13:17] built and then we're going to move on to
[1:13:19] the other sites it's going to sites
[1:13:21] after but it wouldn't be open until
[1:13:23] everything else is finished even if yeah
[1:13:25] okay thank
[1:13:27] you Mr Wes uh so it's more of a comment
[1:13:31] definitely scany winning and respect to
[1:13:33] economic revitalization and
[1:13:35] Redevelopment is definitely something
[1:13:37] that I've come to just appreciate
[1:13:39] whenever you come to our Council and
[1:13:40] definitely is respective of the team and
[1:13:42] its Collective work so to definitely
[1:13:44] thank you for continuing to provide
[1:13:46] these types of results um in that same
[1:13:48] context I also want to say U taking a
[1:13:50] Step Beyond that where it's apparent the
[1:13:53] end users benefit from these types of
[1:13:55] efforts where the grocery store and the
[1:13:57] additional housing and some of the other
[1:13:59] areas that you highlighted but also I
[1:14:01] want to make sure there's considerable
[1:14:02] Investments kind of speaking in in
[1:14:04] spirit to what councilman Farley always
[1:14:06] brings up um making sure that our small
[1:14:08] business owners and our small business
[1:14:10] contractors can see those wins as well
[1:14:12] not to speak as though they do not um
[1:14:14] but saying that we need to continue
[1:14:16] making sure that there are also tangible
[1:14:19] wins for those types of individuals
[1:14:21] where having uh these developers come in
[1:14:23] and help clean up definitely very
[1:14:25] welcomed but I know we have some upand
[1:14:27] cominging businesses within the
[1:14:28] community who are truly prideful scant
[1:14:31] dians that would love to be a part of
[1:14:32] these efforts as well you know that's a
[1:14:33] great point I'm glad you rais it we just
[1:14:35] had an Outreach event up at the Mosaic
[1:14:37] development on Crane Street inviting you
[1:14:39] know the neighborhood in inviting the
[1:14:41] local businesses in we'll do the same
[1:14:42] thing here over and over inviting the
[1:14:45] team in and I'm just comment on earlier
[1:14:47] thrilled that you passed the pro housing
[1:14:50] uh move that forward tonight thank you
[1:14:51] because that's going to help us in so
[1:14:52] many ways that is really be becoming
[1:14:55] something that they they'll look at when
[1:14:56] they're scoring these Grant applications
[1:14:58] to the state so as your development
[1:15:00] director said very well this evening
[1:15:02] that's a very important that'll be
[1:15:04] helpful to our grant applications that
[1:15:05] we're applying
[1:15:07] for Miss Patrick I just um wanted to
[1:15:10] comment about the grocery store because
[1:15:12] of course there's also the Electric City
[1:15:14] grocery store going in at the other end
[1:15:17] um and I'm just wondering if there was
[1:15:19] ever consideration
[1:15:21] of using this site for the Electric City
[1:15:24] grocery store so that now in we'll have
[1:15:27] two Grocery Stores um instead of one
[1:15:31] both are still under development it's a
[1:15:32] good question we have spoke spoken to
[1:15:35] both groups they're both still under
[1:15:38] development um um that's a question you
[1:15:42] have to ask to call
[1:15:45] up okay and I think this is fabulous I'm
[1:15:48] very excited especially that the
[1:15:50] demolition will happen within this year
[1:15:52] is what I think I heard you say um so
[1:15:55] the fence will be going up um the next
[1:15:56] couple weeks around M Honda and um
[1:16:00] you'll see the site remediated and the
[1:16:02] other and the house and the demolition
[1:16:03] as well we're just wait waiting on
[1:16:05] closing the contract once that with the
[1:16:07] housing once we close on that we'll demo
[1:16:09] those Monda will come down sooner uh but
[1:16:12] realistically speaking within the next
[1:16:14] two or three months would be our V I
[1:16:16] really want to thank the team the mayor
[1:16:18] mat we've taken up a lot of your time
[1:16:21] her time on preparing legal briefs and
[1:16:24] other things for the development team
[1:16:26] council president has been uh advising
[1:16:29] us on this and working with us for
[1:16:30] months now on this development you know
[1:16:32] going back made some very good points
[1:16:35] about when we should bring this forward
[1:16:37] uh given the U the legal issues that
[1:16:40] were surrounding this we're very
[1:16:42] confident now this is the time and place
[1:16:43] to move this project forward and and
[1:16:45] clean up this this blight on Al Street
[1:16:48] and and clean up the mwanda site as well
[1:16:51] and again we should say Manda has been
[1:16:53] nothing but Cooperative on this
[1:16:54] abolutely great citizens of the
[1:16:56] community held the option with the
[1:16:59] county for 3 years so that all the
[1:17:01] proper due diligence could be done with
[1:17:03] the cleanup and Etc
[1:17:06] so Mr M on the apartments are there
[1:17:10] considerations for set aside low income
[1:17:13] apartments yeah so the uh the entire uh
[1:17:17] all of the buildings all four of the
[1:17:18] buildings will be affordable affordable
[1:17:20] in income regulated so so you have to
[1:17:23] show
[1:17:25] your your rent is based on your
[1:17:27] income
[1:17:29] okay there these are high quality units
[1:17:32] Business Center Fitness Center
[1:17:35] Parking uh Green Space uh these are
[1:17:38] units every one of us would be proud to
[1:17:40] live in they're made affordable by state
[1:17:43] housing tax credits that are issued so
[1:17:46] that um we don't price these out of the
[1:17:49] range of hardworking connect idiot
[1:17:52] basically and and that's a big part of
[1:17:54] our our agenda as well you wouldn't know
[1:17:56] the difference if this was a marker rate
[1:17:58] or affordable housing it just happens to
[1:17:59] be for affordable people who qualif yeah
[1:18:03] thank you in terms of infrastructure um
[1:18:06] you know we had this we had a similar
[1:18:08] conversation when um the other Hills
[1:18:10] side view went in terms of the sidewalks
[1:18:12] essentially you know what the sidewalk
[1:18:14] BLS look like and obviously walked it so
[1:18:16] that is all built into this so that
[1:18:18] we're it's going to become really
[1:18:20] walkable yes absolutely it's all part of
[1:18:22] our plan okay y a lot of green space
[1:18:25] cleaning up light cleaning up
[1:18:27] environmentally uh dirty sites and and
[1:18:29] building quality units and uh making a a
[1:18:32] walkable development okay we've spent a
[1:18:35] lot of time we're viewing through the
[1:18:36] complete streets program so we're very
[1:18:39] familiar with what city wants and what
[1:18:41] we need to deliver thank
[1:18:44] you anyone else Chris Wen said to me be
[1:18:48] short tonight be
[1:18:50] quicket I have a tendency to go on but
[1:18:53] we wanted to fully on this development
[1:18:56] and we appreciate our whole team coming
[1:18:57] out and U being here tonight we
[1:19:00] appreciate you bearing with us this
[1:19:03] exciting is there anything else you want
[1:19:04] to add council members any other
[1:19:07] questions statements okay so at this
[1:19:10] time um the council would need to thank
[1:19:12] you very much would to um need to
[1:19:15] declare our intent act lead agency to
[1:19:17] refer this to the Planning Commission
[1:19:20] and who and we need to call the public
[1:19:22] hearing yes public hearing call public
[1:19:24] hearing but I would recommend until you
[1:19:25] hear back from the Planning Commission
[1:19:27] you want to wait yeah because what would
[1:19:30] right so we need a time frame is okay so
[1:19:33] um tonight we would need to
[1:19:37] De I would like to request
[1:19:40] right land just like to request that uh
[1:19:43] the Planning Commission meets late this
[1:19:45] month or in June because of juneth so
[1:19:48] the meeting the last so they're meeting
[1:19:50] the last one day of the month so I don't
[1:19:52] think there's any requirement that you
[1:19:54] have the public hearing before that but
[1:19:56] I was hoping that the public hearing
[1:19:57] could be either on June
[1:20:00] 14th dates June 10th or June 24th I mean
[1:20:03] there will be public there people will
[1:20:06] have the opportunity to speak publicly
[1:20:08] the Planning Commission meeting they'll
[1:20:09] have opportunity to speak at every one
[1:20:12] of the council meetings as this gets
[1:20:13] adopted down the road Madam president I
[1:20:15] would recommend that the 24th because by
[1:20:17] that time the Planning Commission would
[1:20:19] have had their meeting and then there
[1:20:22] you would have it on the 24th
[1:20:25] and it would be draft legislation
[1:20:27] perhaps for comment by that time based
[1:20:30] on the actions of the Planning
[1:20:32] Commission so you I'm saying putting it
[1:20:34] out further um our public hearing our
[1:20:38] public hearing on the 24th would be
[1:20:40] based on that schedule would be by that
[1:20:43] time there would be input from the
[1:20:45] Planning Commission to we can work off
[1:20:47] of that to draft an ordinance for the
[1:20:49] public hearing for your review okay so
[1:20:52] you can call for the public hearing hear
[1:20:54] in now if you want but it will not be in
[1:20:56] our regular cycle but it'll be put out a
[1:20:59] little bit later okay thank you thank
[1:21:02] you have do anything
[1:21:04] please all right thank you so uh Mr o'ri
[1:21:07] do we need to do these as three separate
[1:21:09] resolutions um yes you do three separate
[1:21:11] referral okay the seeker and the public
[1:21:14] hearing all right first of all I would
[1:21:16] uh entertain a motion to have the city
[1:21:18] council declar as a leite agency second
[1:21:21] all in favor I um I'd like to to uh have
[1:21:25] the city council refer this to the
[1:21:26] zoning um the zoning change to the
[1:21:29] Planning Commission so second all those
[1:21:31] in favor I I and third I'd like to ask
[1:21:35] um city council to call for a public
[1:21:37] hearing on June 24th so second all those
[1:21:41] in favor I thank you very
[1:21:46] much the remainder of our items are in
[1:21:50] executive session so all members of the
[1:21:52] public will have to leave
[1:21:55] so like motion to go executive session
[1:21:58] so second all in favor thank you
[1:22:12] [Music]
[1:22:24] oh