[1:33] All right. Time to call to order um the
[1:35] U advisory band commission uh August
[1:39] 10th. Uh this meeting is being live
[1:42] streamed by Hunter Production
[1:43] Multimedia.
[1:45] Uh please join me in standing for the
[1:46] pledge of allegiance.
[1:50] I pledge algiance to the flag of the
[1:53] United States of America and to the
[1:55] republic for which it stands. One nation
[1:58] under God, indivisible, with liberty and
[2:01] justice for all.
[2:08] Okay, we roll.
[2:11] Um,
[2:12] let's see. U not not present is Daisy
[2:17] Lucio with Marty Clark.
[2:20] Um see Shane
[2:23] >> here.
[2:24] >> Harold
[2:24] >> here. Brian
[2:26] >> here.
[2:27] >> Wayne
[2:27] >> here.
[2:29] All right. And um
[2:32] with the record show Ronnie Levens is
[2:34] present. Um so we do have a quorum.
[2:38] All right. Um, need a u [clears throat]
[2:41] a motion to approve the agenda.
[2:45] >> I move to approve the agenda.
[2:46] >> Okay. Motion made by Harolds.
[2:49] >> I'll second it.
[2:50] >> Second by Wayne. All in favor say I.
[2:53] >> I.
[2:54] >> Okay.
[2:56] It's been approved. Um
[2:59] for standing business um approval of
[3:02] prior meeting approval of prior um
[3:04] meeting minutes.
[3:07] Um,
[3:08] everybody's received a copy of that.
[3:11] Don't need a motion to approve.
[3:12] >> So move.
[3:13] >> Okay. Motion made by Brian.
[3:16] >> I'll second.
[3:17] >> Second by Shane. All in favor say I.
[3:20] >> I.
[3:22] has it. Um,
[3:25] is there any public comments?
[3:27] >> No.
[3:29] public comments. Um, no old business.
[3:32] All right. Moving on to new business.
[3:36] Um, first up on the agenda is PC2026-5
[3:43] and uh that's the order approving uh
[3:45] declaratory resolution
[3:47] amending central char.
[3:50] So you want to explain that?
[3:52] >> Yeah, good evening. Brad Benson with FBT
[3:55] Given um here redevelopment commission.
[3:58] So um for the next I've got the next
[4:01] four items on the agenda. So, I'll kind
[4:03] of give you a little bit of background
[4:04] here and then we can go through this and
[4:07] address any specific questions you all
[4:08] may have. Um, so first things first is
[4:12] the RDC's already looked at this,
[4:13] approved it. Um, and it'll go here to
[4:16] this board, this commission, uh, then to
[4:19] city council and then it'll go back to
[4:21] RDC which will get rectified and move
[4:23] everything forward actually. That's the
[4:25] process. um timeline of events.
[4:29] How this came about, my understanding is
[4:31] that
[4:33] this was recommended um on behalf of the
[4:36] exhibits itself were prepared by the
[4:37] Wheelie Group, but this was also
[4:38] recommended by Baker Gilly um as far as
[4:42] cleaning up a couple of the items. Some
[4:43] of the things are say just updating.
[4:46] Some of them are cleaning and removing
[4:48] tenant parcels that weren't intended to
[4:50] be included. Um there's a few
[4:53] expansions, but I said at that point I
[4:55] can kind of go through them. I'll start
[4:56] with the first one, which is the O5. Um
[5:00] that one is we are going to be removing
[5:03] a parcel from the central central
[5:07] Charletown allocation area and and
[5:09] adding one to Shadow Lake. Um some of
[5:12] the revisions in Shadow Lake are solely
[5:15] due to changes of parcel numbers. Um
[5:18] that property originally it was
[5:21] originally done before it was platted.
[5:23] So with the new plat obviously created
[5:25] new parcel numbers. Um so that's for
[5:27] that partial there. You are also
[5:31] removing I believe it was removing one
[5:34] of those as well. We see removing the
[5:36] 700 residential homestead parcels which
[5:38] is partly the Woodford farms. There's
[5:41] some areas there. All those exhibits are
[5:43] included um in what was approved by the
[5:45] RDC. Um
[5:49] there's a lot there because of the
[5:51] number of partials you're including, but
[5:53] this time I summed it up as much as I
[5:55] could.
[5:57] >> Okay, I slow you down just a little bit.
[5:59] >> Yeah, go for it.
[5:59] >> So the Shadow Lake.
[6:00] >> Yes, sir.
[6:03] >> We are There was an area that was
[6:05] considered residential.
[6:08] Are you kicking that? What? I don't What
[6:10] do you mean you're moving? What do you
[6:12] mean,
[6:12] >> man? Absolutely. Yeah. I was so fre
[6:18] >> correct. So here's your This is your
[6:21] current sh This is Charles Town. This is
[6:23] the shadow leg side. Uh
[6:28] >> I pulled it all the
[6:32] [clears throat]
[6:32] >> You did.
[6:34] Let me grab my copy here if you don't
[6:36] mind.
[6:46] you may have and it just they all kind
[6:48] of look the same, right? They all say
[6:49] colors of that name there. Let me make
[6:51] sure we're looking at the same one. So,
[6:54] this is the this is the original one.
[6:56] you have is the seat that was what
[6:58] was originally included in the Shadow
[7:00] Lake side of it.
[7:01] >> Okay.
[7:02] >> And then what is being included now is
[7:05] the actual updated plaque included in
[7:09] that parcel.
[7:12] We amend it which is on F.
[7:16] It's this one right here.
[7:19] So you can see how that's changed
[7:20] >> due to the
[7:21] >> So we're going from there to this.
[7:24] >> Correct. Yes, sir.
[7:27] >> Okay. All right. I'm with you now.
[7:30] >> Yeah, it's almost a sideby-side
[7:31] comparison. It makes it a little bit
[7:33] easier here.
[7:39] So they're taking out a bunch of
[7:40] residential plots.
[7:42] >> What about 700? Is that number accurate?
[7:45] >> Yes, sir. Yes, sir.
[7:47] >> About 700 residential
[7:50] parcels.
[7:52] >> So it's taken from the tip boundary
[7:54] >> and that was in the original amended
[7:58] central Charleston
[8:02] and this one here.
[8:03] >> Yeah, I'm looking at that one. Right.
[8:07] Yeah. And this is our most convoluted
[8:08] one out of the four items on the agenda.
[8:10] So
[8:12] >> Okay.
[8:14] All right.
[8:17] » No, but go ahead. Well, I'll catch up
[8:19] here.
[8:22] >> Yeah, you're good. You're good. No,
[8:23] you're good.
[8:23] >> This particular item, I don't have
[8:24] anything else. I just will make sure the
[8:26] commission's comfortable with what we're
[8:27] doing.
[8:28] >> Okay. So, we're we're taking this to
[8:31] this. Is that what you're saying? Let me
[8:34] make sure we're looking at the right
[8:35] one.
[8:35] >> This is uh Shadow Lake and you're taking
[8:39] it to that.
[8:40] >> Correct. And this was it added the road
[8:45] here.
[8:45] >> Correct. So originally Shadow Lake's a
[8:48] good one. Originally that was not
[8:50] platted the road through it the surf,
[8:52] you know. So it's more of cleaning up,
[8:54] updating what is accurate as far as
[8:56] partial numbers.
[8:57] >> Okay. So this is we're not changing the
[8:59] tip on this. you're on for Shadow Lake.
[9:04] >> I'm sorry. I don't mean that.
[9:06] >> You're fine. This is part of why I'm
[9:08] here to answer questions and and do the
[9:10] best I can to make you guys comfortable
[9:12] before we make a decision on it. Um,
[9:14] yes, there is some revisions on on all
[9:17] of them, right? On central.
[9:21] >> Yes, correct.
[9:22] >> So, are you changing the years of the
[9:23] tip? Are you just changing the the loc
[9:26] the boundaries of the tip? We are
[9:29] updating the partial numbers on those
[9:31] tips to make it more to reflect the
[9:33] accurate numbers to space.
[9:36] >> Okay. And there are some additional
[9:39] there's some a little bit of changes to
[9:41] some of these like this little triangle
[9:42] was added.
[9:44] Okay. I think I know what you're doing
[9:46] now. All right. Go ahead.
[9:48] >> Does anybody else have any other
[9:49] questions on this item?
[9:52] >> I apologize for it. It's a little little
[9:54] confusing with such a
[9:55] >> tip boundary will stay the same.
[9:58] Except except for the ones that we've listed that those are J show that
[10:02] are shown on there. Yes, sir. Okay. Yes,
[10:03] sir. Got you.
[10:04] >> So, standard tax revenues, it'll roll
[10:06] back into the general taxing units.
[10:10] >> I'm sorry. Say that again.
[10:12] >> Uh
[10:14] the let's see the standard tax revenues
[10:17] do they flow I guess it'll flow back
[10:19] into the general taxing taxing units.
[10:23] Well, for the TIFF itself, it it would
[10:26] stay all everything stays the same,
[10:28] right? It all funds into the TIFF the
[10:30] fund there. But this one, what we're
[10:34] doing here is clarifying the parcels,
[10:36] rectifying what has been changed over
[10:38] the years. Um, due to the plat said,
[10:41] there were some additions. There was
[10:43] some one or two of these parcels should
[10:45] not have included originally due to fat
[10:48] finger typos
[10:50] to rectify what should have been
[10:51] included in it. that tax that tax uh
[10:55] revenue will stay with that tip. They
[10:57] won't go into the general fund.
[10:58] >> Correct.
[10:59] >> Okay.
[11:04] » I'm I'm
[11:07] sorry.
[11:16] » Start throwing something at
[11:18] >> Y.
[11:21] You're you're getting there. I was in
[11:22] the meeting and and
[11:25] basically um Matt when you presented it, in fashion on each one
[11:30] of these resolutions. Um and indicating
[11:33] that there were parcels that had been
[11:35] misidentified earlier were now being
[11:38] removed and then other parcels were
[11:40] being added to the t district. It really
[11:42] didn't change.
[11:43] >> Boundaries didn't change
[11:44] >> change at all. Didn't change anything of
[11:45] that nature. Just cleaned it up. Um and
[11:47] then when you get to the last one, the
[11:49] Clark North Clark um basically
[11:52] determined that it was a kind of a
[11:54] pointless tiff district based upon the
[11:57] area there in the fund. Yeah. So
[12:00] >> yeah, there's no So there's no impact to
[12:03] our municipal
[12:05] >> funds or anything.
[12:07] >> No impact there.
[12:08] >> Okay. Got that.
[12:09] >> And the one he just referenced was this
[12:11] one on the I believe it was 08. So the
[12:14] last one I'm glad you did. No, you're
[12:16] everything he said, we're on the same
[12:18] page, but it's always good when we say
[12:20] the same thing. Gota
[12:28] move on to the next one as far as I'm
[12:30] concerned. Oh, we need to make a motion.
[12:35] >> Okay. Uh yeah. So, uh we need a motion
[12:38] to um approve the PC 20265.
[12:44] >> I'll make that motion.
[12:45] >> Okay. Motion made by Wayne.
[12:47] >> Second.
[12:48] by Brian. Any further discussion?
[12:52] All in favor say I.
[12:53] >> I.
[12:54] >> Any opposed? Okay. Eyes have it.
[12:57] Unanimous.
[13:01] » All right. Um.
[13:04] Okay. Next item is the uh PC 2026.
[13:10] >> Yes sir. And that is for the order
[13:14] approving um the resolution amending the
[13:17] Indian American economic development
[13:18] area. Um what this one is is that
[13:21] removing an uned
[13:23] parcel. So it's just one parcel here
[13:26] that that is being removed that should
[13:28] not have been and I'm finding the
[13:31] exhibit for you right now. I can see it.
[13:33] >> So just correcting the boundary error.
[13:35] >> Correct.
[13:37] This was not shown on there, but it was
[13:38] a little triangle.
[13:41] >> Yeah.
[13:41] >> Where? Which one?
[13:45] » Just a little triangle right here.
[13:49] >> Okay.
[13:55] So, this is right here on 62.
[14:00] Get rid of the triangle.
[14:04] Okay, that's just cleaning up parcels
[14:06] also.
[14:06] >> That's removing one that should not have
[14:08] been included originally.
[14:10] >> Just cleaning up. Yes, sir.
[14:11] >> Okay,
[14:14] this is the same.
[14:16] >> I don't want to repeat myself, but for
[14:18] the this is was approved. It was
[14:21] recommended by Baker Tilly uh based off
[14:24] of it and the Wheatley group is involved
[14:27] in it as well. So, this RDC has approved
[14:30] it. here council back to them.
[14:36] » I make a motion.
[14:37] >> I'll second it.
[14:39] >> Okay. Motion made by Brian, seconded by
[14:41] Shane. Any further discussion?
[14:45] All in favor say I.
[14:46] >> I.
[14:47] >> Any opposed?
[14:48] >> Okay. I
[14:52] straight.
[14:58] » Okay. Okay, on to the next item PC
[15:00] 20267.
[15:05] » Yes. So, this is the um same thing we've
[15:08] done last for the previous two items,
[15:10] but this is for the uh depot street uh
[15:14] in our development area. Um it is
[15:19] going to clarify and consolidate some of
[15:22] the parcels that the numbers have
[15:23] changed throughout the years. Um, and
[15:26] then removing one partial that was. Now,
[15:29] this one does add a an adjacent piece to
[15:32] this. We'll make sure to clarify.
[15:47] Okay.
[15:55] I don't see.
[15:56] >> This is the little small triangle here.
[15:58] [clears throat]
[16:05] » Oh, okay. Yeah. See that?
[16:37] So you say this one brings in um new
[16:41] parcels.
[16:41] >> This brings in one one new parcel. Yes
[16:44] sir.
[16:44] >> Okay. To the tip area.
[16:46] >> It it removes one and brings one in. Um
[16:49] the removal was unattended piece. The
[16:51] other ones were clarifications. Those
[16:53] have changed over the years planning
[16:56] process over.
[16:58] Okay.
[17:02] Any any discussion?
[17:04] >> I'll second.
[17:07] >> Okay. So, um we need a motion.
[17:09] >> Motion.
[17:10] Brian and second by Harold.
[17:13] >> Any further discussion? All in favor say
[17:16] I.
[17:17] >> I.
[17:19] >> Passes unanimously.
[17:27] Okay.
[17:31] » All right. Um, next item PC 20268.
[17:36] >> Yes. And this is the one that he
[17:38] mentioned earlier, the North Clar
[17:40] Community Hospital Economic Development
[17:41] Area. Um, this is to terminate that area
[17:46] due to a it just quite hasn't formed.
[17:49] Um, it's only got $102
[17:53] that it's collected in it.
[17:54] >> Has it uh has it has it expired?
[17:57] >> No, it has not expired.
[17:59] >> But we can kill it even though it hasn't
[18:00] expired.
[18:01] >> Correct. That's what this is.
[18:02] >> Okay.
[18:05] >> And just for my clarification so we
[18:08] understand, even though it's only
[18:10] gaining three three, what' you say?
[18:12] >> $312. Yes, sir.
[18:15] >> Is it we kill it just because it's more
[18:18] of a in the neck just to do the
[18:20] paperwork and is that why
[18:22] >> yes
[18:23] >> that was that was the consensus
[18:26] let's
[18:27] >> it's not it's not worth
[18:28] >> burden on the court treasur's office to
[18:30] have to deal with that through state
[18:31] board of accounts and it would be better
[18:33] accounting
[18:34] >> okay
[18:34] >> I it brings it back in gets it out of
[18:37] the tip brings back in yeah I'm okay
[18:40] with it
[18:42] since
[18:43] >> I figured this would be the easiest one
[18:44] right
[18:47] nothing [laughter] so Yeah, that's just
[18:50] sitting there doing nothing. So
[18:52] frustrating.
[18:53] >> Any further discussions on that
[18:55] questions?
[18:57] >> Okay, so um we'll need a motion to
[18:59] approve PC2608.
[19:02] Motion made by Wayne.
[19:04] >> I'll second it.
[19:05] >> Second by Harold. Any further
[19:06] discussion?
[19:08] All in favor say I. I.
[19:10] >> Any opposed? Okay. Passes unanimously.
[19:14] >> Thank you all. I appreciate your
[19:15] >> Thank you. Appreciate it. Yes, sir. What
[19:17] are these?
[19:18] >> That was for the overall
[19:20] >> first. Yes. For the first one for the
[19:23] original 05 resolution,
[19:27] >> Shadow Lakes, the Charles Town. Um,
[19:32] so this was
[19:34] >> So did we kill a bunch of this area?
[19:36] >> So some of this was removed. Yes, sir.
[19:39] >> So went from here to there. This was the
[19:42] part of the uh 700 res that was
[19:47] >> okay.
[19:52] I got
[19:53] >> yell at me.
[19:58] » I'm just trying to make sure I
[19:59] appreciate you doing your duty. Doing
[20:01] your duty.
[20:02] >> Anything else?
[20:03] >> Thank you all very much. I appreciate
[20:05] it. Thank you. I do want to mention the
[20:07] very last um item on the agenda uh which
[20:11] says hand out draft agency policies and
[20:14] procedures. We're not voting on that
[20:16] tonight. That is just for us to review.
[20:18] I think we will be voting on it at the
[20:20] next.
[20:21] >> Are they in here? It is. It's at the
[20:23] very It was in the very back of the
[20:24] packet. It's like this rules and
[20:26] procedures.
[20:27] >> It's about the last seven or eight
[20:29] pages, I believe. Okay. I'll
[20:31] >> check it out. Hey, anything else?
[20:36] All right. Good. All right. Uh, need a
[20:39] motion to adjurnn.
[20:41] >> Motion to adjurnn.
[20:42] >> Motion made by Shane.
[20:44] >> Second.
[20:45] by Wayne. All in favor say I.
[20:47] >> I.
[20:48] We are adjourned.