1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,000 Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor? I. 2 00:00:03,760 --> 00:00:10,400 » Any opposed? All right. Under new business, item number three, review of 3 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:14,160 two event facility license applications. Jesse, 4 00:00:11,599 --> 00:00:17,920 » thank you. Good evening, everybody. Uh before you for your consideration, we 5 00:00:15,679 --> 00:00:23,119 have two event facility uh applications. The first one being business owner Salon 6 00:00:20,080 --> 00:00:26,720 Aventtos Madani LLC. Doing business as the same. The applicant's name is 7 00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:31,359 Rebecca Pettis. The location will be 2518 East Walnut Avenue. Uh, and this 8 00:00:29,679 --> 00:00:34,399 comes with a positive recommendation by the public safety commission. 9 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:38,079 » All right, council members, any questions on this item? If not, I'll 10 00:00:36,719 --> 00:00:39,840 entertain a motion. >> So move. 11 00:00:38,960 --> 00:00:42,480 » Have a motion. >> Second. 12 00:00:40,239 --> 00:00:46,960 » A second. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor? I. 13 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:49,200 » Any opposed? All right. 14 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:53,520 » Thank you. The next one is going to be business owner Blancas Venue LLC doing 15 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:57,760 business as Blancas Venue. The applicant's name is Jose Manuel Gonzalez 16 00:00:55,360 --> 00:01:01,600 Reyes. The location will be 1359 Pleasant Grove Drive. It also comes with 17 00:00:59,920 --> 00:01:04,640 a positive recommendation by the public safety commission. 18 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:07,439 » All right. Any comments or questions on this item? If not, I'll entertain a 19 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,040 motion. >> Motion. 20 00:01:08,320 --> 00:01:11,680 » Have a motion. >> Second. 21 00:01:09,439 --> 00:01:16,640 » A second. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor? I. 22 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:22,240 » Any opposed? All right. Item number four, review of two new 2026 alcohol 23 00:01:19,759 --> 00:01:26,000 beverage applications. >> Thank you, Madam Mayor. Um the first one 24 00:01:24,320 --> 00:01:30,159 is going to be business owners along the Aventtos Madani LLC doing business as 25 00:01:28,400 --> 00:01:35,520 the same. The applicant's name is Rebecca Perez. The location will be 2518 26 00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:39,439 East Wana Avenue. Uh the license stop is going to be pouring beer and wine for an 27 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:42,799 event center and it also comes with a positive recommendation by the public 28 00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:46,000 safety commission. Right. >> Are there any questions or comments on 29 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:47,680 this item? If not, I'll entertain a motion. 30 00:01:46,799 --> 00:01:49,119 » So move. >> Have a motion. 31 00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:53,280 » Second. >> Second. Is there any discussion? Not. 32 00:01:51,439 --> 00:01:56,079 All in favor? I >> any opposed? 33 00:01:55,200 --> 00:02:00,320 » Okay. >> And lastly, we have a business owner 34 00:01:58,159 --> 00:02:06,399 Fifth Avenue Business Incorporated doing business as A2C Super Marcato. The 35 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:10,640 applicant's name is Sulaman Mmani. The location will be 613 Fifth Avenue. Uh 36 00:02:09,119 --> 00:02:14,239 they're applying for a porn, beer, and wine uh for a retail store. Also comes 37 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:16,879 with a positive recommendation by the public safety commission. 38 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:20,160 » All right. Questions or comments on this item? Not. I'll entertain a motion. 39 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:23,760 » So move. >> Motion. 40 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:28,319 » Second. Second. Is there any discussion? Not. All in favor? I. Any opposed? 41 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:31,760 » Thank you, Jesse. >> Thank you. 42 00:02:29,599 --> 00:02:35,280 » Right. Item number five, professional services contract with emergency 43 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:39,040 services consulting international for DFD community risk assessment and 44 00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:43,360 standard of cover. Chief. >> Yes. Good evening, Madame Mayor, 45 00:02:40,319 --> 00:02:47,360 Council. This is a CIP. Uh the purpose of this study is to evaluate current 46 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:52,400 fire and emergency service delivery and development recommendations for staffing 47 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:57,120 station and apparatus deployment response times and future resource 48 00:02:54,560 --> 00:03:03,040 needs. The analysis will evaluate the relationship between community risk call 49 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:08,720 volume uh workload staffing resource distribution effective response force 50 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:13,200 response times while identifying current strength service gaps and areas of 51 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:17,200 improvement. This comes with a positive recommendation from the public safety. 52 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:23,360 » Right. Are there questions or comments on this item? Not. I do have one. This 53 00:03:20,159 --> 00:03:28,480 is in your existing budget. Is this captured or planned for at CIP 54 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:33,200 for capital improvement projects? >> Okay. All right. Are there any other 55 00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:35,440 questions or comments on this item? >> Not. I'll entertain a motion. 56 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:36,640 » So move. >> Have a motion. 57 00:03:36,239 --> 00:03:42,000 » Second. >> A second. Is there any discussion? If 58 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:46,560 not, all in favor? I. Any opposed? Thank you, Chief. 59 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:50,480 » Item number six, GRPA boost grant memorandum of understanding for 60 00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:55,840 afterchool programs and summer camp. Steve, 61 00:03:52,560 --> 00:04:01,519 » so we're excited to uh be awarded this again um this year. Um there was a few 62 00:03:59,439 --> 00:04:08,720 more people that put in for it. So our amount did go down by a little bit, but 63 00:04:03,439 --> 00:04:14,879 it is a um a grant for $27,500 from GRPA and the boost. Um the the 64 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:19,840 funds are going to be used for after school programs, our summer camps. It is 65 00:04:17,519 --> 00:04:25,040 a reimbursement grant that does not require matching funds. So these funds 66 00:04:22,079 --> 00:04:28,720 will help boost our programs. Um and again it it is nothing but but positive. 67 00:04:28,400 --> 00:04:32,639 So >> okay. All right. Are there questions or 68 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:34,639 comments on this item? Not I'll entertain a motion. 69 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:35,919 » Motion. [clears throat] >> Motion. 70 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:42,320 » Second. >> Second. Is there any discussion? If not, 71 00:04:38,160 --> 00:04:46,880 all in favor? I. Any opposed? >> Right. Thank you. Item number seven, 72 00:04:44,639 --> 00:04:49,280 Temple Bethl Memorial Park project contract change order number two. 73 00:04:48,479 --> 00:04:52,560 Jackson. >> Good evening, mayor and council. So this 74 00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:58,479 contract extension is requested by the general contractor complete site LLC for 75 00:04:55,199 --> 00:05:02,720 a completion extension deadline of 105 calendar days to December 18th for all 76 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:07,199 uh construction elements. This is primarily derived from delays from the 77 00:05:05,280 --> 00:05:12,960 sourcing from uh materials from the manufacturer for the the custom pre-cast 78 00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:15,840 capston as well as to enable uh planting of the landscape elements within the 79 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:20,560 optimal planting season which is in the month of December. I know the weather's 80 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:22,639 not been very cooperative either. >> Yes. 81 00:05:21,360 --> 00:05:26,479 » All right. Are there questions or comments on this item? Not. I'll 82 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:27,840 entertain a motion. >> So move. 83 00:05:27,120 --> 00:05:30,720 » Have a motion. >> Second. 84 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:35,120 » A second. Is there any discussion? Not. All in favor? 85 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:40,560 » Any opposed? All right. Item number eight, Arcadus task order number 16, 86 00:05:37,280 --> 00:05:45,120 Lakemont Drive, Overtar Creek Design. So, this professional service agreement 87 00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:49,600 with Arcadus is for uh developing construction plans to replace the Boss 88 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:53,360 Culver located at the Lakemont Drive crossing of Tar Creek adjacent to 89 00:05:51,199 --> 00:05:58,880 Brookwood Drive. This particular location was identified as a high 90 00:05:55,360 --> 00:06:03,280 priority for replacement um in a included within a report produced by 91 00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:08,960 Atlas who is performing bridge assessments uh within the city. So, this 92 00:06:05,919 --> 00:06:14,400 would be uh 120 calendar day completion. Uh the cost is $99,431 93 00:06:11,919 --> 00:06:19,199 and the funding source is from 2024's floss SP 356 project account as also 94 00:06:17,840 --> 00:06:22,000 receives a positive recommendation from the public works committee. 95 00:06:20,639 --> 00:06:25,919 » All right. Are there questions or comments on this item? Not I'll 96 00:06:24,639 --> 00:06:27,039 entertain a motion. >> Motion. 97 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:31,360 » Second. >> Have a motion and a second. Is there any 98 00:06:28,800 --> 00:06:37,600 discussion? If not, all in favor? >> I. Any opposed? Item number nine, 99 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:41,680 Arcadus task order number 17, 223, Golden Rod Lane Design Services. 100 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:46,880 » So, this professional service agreement is to produce a uh a conceptual 101 00:06:44,639 --> 00:06:51,759 improvement for the existing storm water deficiencies located around the 223 102 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:55,199 Golden Rod residence. This location in particular is is included within the 103 00:06:53,360 --> 00:07:00,800 city's offrightway areas of concern catalog. And the cost for this would be 104 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:06,160 $22,447. The funding source would also be within 105 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:09,680 the 2024 floss SP 356 project account and receives a pause recommendation from 106 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:13,360 the public works committee as well. >> All right. Are there questions or 107 00:07:10,880 --> 00:07:15,280 comments on this item? If not, I will entertain a motion. 108 00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:16,720 » So move. >> Have a motion. 109 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:23,280 » Second. >> Second. Is there any discussion? If not, 110 00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:29,120 all in favor? I. Any opposed? Thank you, Jackson. Item number 10, first reading, 111 00:07:26,639 --> 00:07:33,199 ordinance 26-20 to hear the request of the Salvation 112 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:38,720 Army to reszone from rural residential R5 to limited commercial C1A, a 113 00:07:35,919 --> 00:07:44,639 attractive land totaling 0.706 acres located at 1108 114 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:47,639 and 1110 Penrose Drive. parcels 12-182-02-12, 115 00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:51,720 parcel 12-182-02-13, 116 00:07:51,919 --> 00:07:55,880 and parcel 12182-02-014. 117 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:03,360 Ethan, >> thank you, Madame Mayor and Council. Uh, 118 00:08:01,039 --> 00:08:10,960 this is fairly straightforward reasonzoning. Uh not that long ago, this 119 00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:15,599 had been reszoned from the C1 zone district neighborhood commercial to R5 120 00:08:13,440 --> 00:08:20,960 with the intent for the Salvation Army to build duplex dwellings on the subject 121 00:08:18,639 --> 00:08:25,360 property. Approximately two duplex dwellings and they've done so on some 122 00:08:23,759 --> 00:08:30,000 other adjacent properties that you can see on the zoning map. Those other 123 00:08:26,879 --> 00:08:35,120 tracks zoned R5 uh were all part of that action. and there are some duplexes on 124 00:08:32,560 --> 00:08:39,519 some of the C1 properties as legal non-conforming uses. 125 00:08:37,599 --> 00:08:45,360 What they ran into were some setback issues on the subject property. So those 126 00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:50,399 three parcels that make up the subject property that we see on the screen that 127 00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:56,240 are being requested to be reszoned from R5 to C1A 128 00:08:54,399 --> 00:09:02,640 um have just have some setback situations because of that becoming 129 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:07,200 a double fronted lot that comes to a point creates some challenges for them 130 00:09:04,560 --> 00:09:11,120 to develop that on individual parcels because in the R5 zone district you can 131 00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:17,040 have a duplex dwelling which is precisely what they want to develop, but 132 00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:21,360 in order to have that, you have to have one principal dwelling per tract of 133 00:09:19,839 --> 00:09:26,160 land. While they have enough acreage and 134 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:29,680 plenty enough room to have two duplexes, because of that narrowing lot, because 135 00:09:27,839 --> 00:09:34,640 it being a double fronted lot, setbacks are different on double fronted lots. 136 00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:39,040 And so with those challenges, they had requested the C1A zone district because 137 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:43,839 their engineer determined that they could have two duplex dwellings on this 138 00:09:41,279 --> 00:09:48,240 property if they could combine all three tracks of land on the subject property 139 00:09:45,680 --> 00:09:52,000 into one tract of land, which you can see on their preliminary site plan and 140 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:56,560 how they would locate those two duplexes. And they could meet the 141 00:09:53,440 --> 00:10:00,800 setbacks, they could meet the zoning, and not have any issues with that piece 142 00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:04,080 of property. And based on the surrounding development, uh there are 143 00:10:02,399 --> 00:10:08,560 already a number of duplexes that exist in this area, a number of rental 144 00:10:05,519 --> 00:10:11,440 properties, single family, multifamily. It's all part of the Salvation Army 145 00:10:10,160 --> 00:10:16,800 campus. So, we did not see any disruption in land use. In terms of 146 00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:21,120 zoning, uh both the R5 zone district and the C1A zone district 147 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:27,519 share several uses, one of those being single family detached dwellings as well 148 00:10:23,760 --> 00:10:32,560 as u duplex dwellings. And there's also no conflict with C1A or 149 00:10:30,800 --> 00:10:36,880 C1. Both of those are very limited commercial zone districts. So this 150 00:10:34,560 --> 00:10:40,399 wouldn't uh create any entering wedge or spot zone or any of those type 151 00:10:38,399 --> 00:10:44,640 situations. So with all that in consideration and the fact that no uh 152 00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:48,480 public opposition was heard at the public hearing, staff recommendation was 153 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:52,720 to approve and the planning commission recommended unanimously to approve the 154 00:10:50,399 --> 00:10:54,640 C1A. I'll be happy to answer any questions. 155 00:10:53,279 --> 00:10:58,640 » All right. Are there questions or comments on this item of Ethan? This is 156 00:10:56,959 --> 00:11:03,040 a first reading so we will take no action on it this evening. 157 00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:09,760 » I have two questions on the first one. So if you switch first of all do um 158 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:14,959 Salvation Army own both of the dwellings that's sitting there. They do 159 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:17,279 » they do their intent is to uh raise those they would redevelop that 160 00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:21,839 property. >> Okay. And then the second one, if 161 00:11:19,360 --> 00:11:26,399 they're occupied, uh, will it affect their insurance? Cuz, you know, usually 162 00:11:23,440 --> 00:11:30,560 when you switch zones, you have to get the insurance approved. 163 00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:33,680 » Uh, I think in this case, there'll be residential buildings rather than 164 00:11:32,079 --> 00:11:37,760 commercial buildings, and there'll be no mixing of commercial and and 165 00:11:35,680 --> 00:11:43,120 residential. I can't say for sure. That's that's not my expertise on 166 00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:46,560 insurance. Um but because >> the reason I ask because usually that's 167 00:11:44,959 --> 00:11:50,000 why most people come and they say they couldn't get insurance because the 168 00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:54,320 zoning got switched >> right I think in this case a lot of 169 00:11:51,760 --> 00:11:58,399 times insurance and mortgage is in terms of getting or getting a mortgage a lot 170 00:11:56,640 --> 00:12:02,240 of times in this case it'll be Salvation Army and I would presume that they'll 171 00:12:00,079 --> 00:12:06,480 operate this out of either philanthropic funds or internal budget. 172 00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:13,279 » All right. Are there any other questions or comments on this item? If not, it 173 00:12:09,839 --> 00:12:19,839 will be eligible to be heard at the and voted upon if desired by the council um 174 00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:25,040 at the next scheduled meeting. All right. Thank you, Ethan. All right. 175 00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:29,120 There is no supplemental business before I do have um before this body. Um we do 176 00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:34,880 have an announcement and you should be able to see behind us here. Um this has 177 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:41,760 been published um as is required by state law um timely. And so let's read 178 00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:47,839 this. The city of Dalton has tentatively adopted a millage rate which will 179 00:12:44,079 --> 00:12:53,120 increase property taxes by 14.24% over the roll back rate. And the roll 180 00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:57,600 back rate just so we're just for educational purposes would mean that we 181 00:12:55,440 --> 00:13:03,760 would roll back our millage rate to a rate that we would collect no additional 182 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:09,120 taxes that weren't new taxes. So if there was new growth, new home was built 183 00:13:06,399 --> 00:13:14,800 and that grew our tax collections, that wouldn't qualify as a tax increase. But 184 00:13:11,600 --> 00:13:21,920 as defined by state law language, not doing the roll back rate fully is 185 00:13:18,320 --> 00:13:27,200 technically um a tax increase and must be advertised as such if it is being 186 00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:32,079 contemplated. All concerned citizens are invited to the following public hearing 187 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:36,880 on this tax increase. The proposed hearings are scheduled as follows. First 188 00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:44,320 hearing, September the 11th, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. It's here. Um second hearing, 189 00:13:40,399 --> 00:13:50,959 September 21st, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. Third hearing, September 21st, 2026 at 6:00 190 00:13:47,519 --> 00:13:57,600 p.m. That's also a council um night. uh adoption of millage rate scheduled for 191 00:13:53,839 --> 00:14:01,519 September the 21st, 2026 act 6 pm. Hearings will be held in the council 192 00:13:59,199 --> 00:14:06,000 chambers at Daltton City Hall 300 West Wall Street. I don't believe there are 193 00:14:03,519 --> 00:14:10,399 any other announcements at this time. I will entertain a motion to adjurnn. 194 00:14:08,639 --> 00:14:15,440 » I have a motion. I have a second. Is there any discussion? If not, all in 195 00:14:12,639 --> 00:14:20,959 favor? I. Any opposed? We are adjourned. Thank you all for coming this evening. 196 00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:20,959 Hope everybody has a good week.