1 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:56,319 morning. We will call the August 19th 2 00:03:56,319 --> 00:03:58,239 DRC meeting to order and we'll start 3 00:03:58,239 --> 00:03:59,760 with roll call. Planning departments 4 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:00,959 present. Police 5 00:04:00,959 --> 00:04:01,760 >> Andrew King 6 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:02,959 >> public works. 7 00:04:02,959 --> 00:04:03,840 >> Dale Smith. 8 00:04:03,840 --> 00:04:04,640 >> Fire. 9 00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:05,599 >> Jeremy Autoville. 10 00:04:05,599 --> 00:04:06,000 >> Building 11 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:07,040 >> John Hansen. 12 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:09,200 >> Okay. First item on the agenda. what 13 00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:11,760 would be public comment period. I'm I'm 14 00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:13,487 getting good. I'm I'm remembering it. 15 00:04:13,487 --> 00:04:15,200 [laughter] 16 00:04:15,200 --> 00:04:16,639 Any member of the public would like to 17 00:04:16,639 --> 00:04:18,880 speak on any items on the agenda or not 18 00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:21,840 on the agenda? You have three minutes. 19 00:04:21,840 --> 00:04:24,479 Anybody wishing to speak? 20 00:04:24,479 --> 00:04:26,320 All right, we'll move on to construction 21 00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:28,080 site plan. First one is the others out 22 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:30,880 parcel. Second submitt and June son is 23 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:32,639 the project manager. 24 00:04:32,639 --> 00:04:35,120 >> Good morning. Um this is the other out 25 00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:38,880 parasell CSP second cell middle. Um this 26 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:41,919 is the second phase of 2050 27 00:04:41,919 --> 00:04:45,280 PMA surrenal road development for the 77 28 00:04:45,280 --> 00:04:46,800 7400 29 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:48,400 square ft commercial building for 30 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:51,440 multi-tenant for office restaurant and 31 00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:55,919 retail and DRC members had no comments 32 00:04:55,919 --> 00:04:59,199 so recommend for approval. 33 00:04:59,199 --> 00:05:01,600 >> All right appears the applicant is here 34 00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:05,919 Josh any items for the DRC? Okay with 35 00:05:05,919 --> 00:05:07,919 that planning recommends approval. Uh, 36 00:05:07,919 --> 00:05:10,720 police, no comment. Public works, 37 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:11,600 >> no comments. 38 00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:12,720 >> All right. Fire, 39 00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:13,600 >> no comments. 40 00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:14,240 >> And building, 41 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:15,440 >> I don't have anything. Thank you. 42 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:18,560 >> Got the approval through the DRC. 43 00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:20,479 Next item on the agenda is Northwest 44 00:05:20,479 --> 00:05:23,520 Church CSP second submitt. Jean Sanchez, 45 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:26,950 project manager. 46 00:05:26,960 --> 00:05:30,400 » Get my paper in order here. Sorry about 47 00:05:30,400 --> 00:05:32,400 that. Good morning. This is the second 48 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:35,360 submitt for the Northwest Church. If you 49 00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:37,120 recall, this was the one where the 50 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:39,919 development order was um expired 51 00:05:39,919 --> 00:05:42,080 essentially. And so they're resubmitting 52 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:45,919 for a construction site plan. Um this is 53 00:05:45,919 --> 00:05:49,600 the Northwest Church. Uh their CSB is 54 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:52,000 for 23,000. 55 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:55,120 It's about 23,200 square ft of place of 56 00:05:55,120 --> 00:05:56,880 worship. It's on the southeast corner of 57 00:05:56,880 --> 00:06:00,909 Limit Road and Shopki Road. Um 58 00:06:00,909 --> 00:06:01,680 [clears throat] 59 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:04,800 they did submit some updated 60 00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:06,960 uh I think they meant they intended to 61 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:08,880 submit an updated traffic study. That 62 00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:10,560 was one of the significant things last 63 00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:16,000 time. Um and I just saw some 64 00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:18,080 conflicting dates as well on the 65 00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:20,720 landscaping and irrigation I think. Um 66 00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:22,400 but otherwise there are just some 67 00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:27,039 housekeeping items that um 68 00:06:27,039 --> 00:06:30,479 planning made comments on. Um we also 69 00:06:30,479 --> 00:06:33,360 need the the applicant to understand 70 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:36,400 that a tree removal permit must be based 71 00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:39,120 on today's rate rather than I I'm not 72 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:41,360 sure if this the mitigation was 73 00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:43,440 calculated before the increase of the 74 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:46,479 arbor mitigation fee was established. So 75 00:06:46,479 --> 00:06:48,000 other than that, I really don't have 76 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:51,749 anything additional. 77 00:06:51,759 --> 00:06:54,639 » Any questions uh from any other DRC 78 00:06:54,639 --> 00:06:55,919 members for the applicant of the 79 00:06:55,919 --> 00:06:58,160 applicants in attendance? Uh any 80 00:06:58,160 --> 00:06:59,280 comments or questions? 81 00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:00,000 >> I have a question. 82 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:01,039 >> All right. If you wouldn't mind coming 83 00:07:01,039 --> 00:07:05,270 up here, Mr. Sabali. 84 00:07:05,280 --> 00:07:06,880 » Good morning. [clears throat] Good 85 00:07:06,880 --> 00:07:09,440 morning everyone. Sam Sabali with Thomas 86 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:11,440 Engineering. Uh I just have a question 87 00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:15,120 on the utility comments. Um 88 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:17,520 uh not sure they if they came from you, 89 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,560 but uh there was a comment about uh the 90 00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:22,479 lift station 91 00:07:22,479 --> 00:07:26,639 and providing perimeter fencing. Um 92 00:07:26,639 --> 00:07:29,280 wanted to see if that's uh we looked in 93 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:30,720 the code. I couldn't see it as a 94 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:32,080 requirement in the code, but it 95 00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:34,639 references a detail. Uh the prior 96 00:07:34,639 --> 00:07:38,000 submitt, we had landscaping around it, 97 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:40,240 and it's sitting way in the back. If you 98 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:43,199 look on the site plan, 99 00:07:43,199 --> 00:07:45,280 it's behind the building close to the 100 00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:47,360 dumpster area and we have a hedge around 101 00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:48,960 it. Just wanted to see if we need to 102 00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:49,919 fence it. 103 00:07:49,919 --> 00:07:51,280 >> It's it's actually part of the 104 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:53,120 requirements and it is in our, you know, 105 00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:56,000 standards and I did miss it like my 106 00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:58,080 comment said, but you know, your comment 107 00:07:58,080 --> 00:07:59,360 says that you're going to meet all of 108 00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:01,360 our standards. So, you know, it'll have 109 00:08:01,360 --> 00:08:03,199 to be a fencing that's actually approved 110 00:08:03,199 --> 00:08:05,919 by, you know, development services. 111 00:08:05,919 --> 00:08:10,160 >> Okay. So, uh, is there any specific 112 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:11,039 requirements for 113 00:08:11,039 --> 00:08:12,960 >> defense? There are. If you'll look at 114 00:08:12,960 --> 00:08:15,520 the Apopka, you know, design standards. 115 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:18,080 >> Okay. It's And 116 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,520 um, okay, I'll reach out to you because 117 00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:23,520 I couldn't find it online. So, 118 00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:26,160 >> okay. We've got uh, like I said, there's 119 00:08:26,160 --> 00:08:28,720 the written words and there's u at least 120 00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:31,039 one or two, you know, detail plates in 121 00:08:31,039 --> 00:08:32,880 the back of the design standards that, 122 00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:34,959 you know, show what is required. 123 00:08:34,959 --> 00:08:36,719 >> All right. And that's for private lift 124 00:08:36,719 --> 00:08:37,839 stations. 125 00:08:37,839 --> 00:08:40,479 >> It's and our standard says for public or 126 00:08:40,479 --> 00:08:41,200 private. 127 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:43,599 >> Okay. All right. That's the only thing. 128 00:08:43,599 --> 00:08:45,519 So I guess from a plan revision 129 00:08:45,519 --> 00:08:48,480 standpoint, this is the only outstanding 130 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:49,279 item for us. 131 00:08:49,279 --> 00:08:50,959 >> Well, and you know, like I said, I think 132 00:08:50,959 --> 00:08:52,720 your note covers that. I don't think you 133 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:54,880 need to modify your plans. Like I said, 134 00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:57,760 >> okay, so we can just missed it. I said 135 00:08:57,760 --> 00:08:59,279 your note covers it. And then I just 136 00:08:59,279 --> 00:09:01,279 wanted to reiterate, you know, what the 137 00:09:01,279 --> 00:09:02,160 note covered. 138 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:05,120 >> Okay. I got it. Thank you. All right. 139 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:07,680 >> So, it should be it 140 00:09:07,680 --> 00:09:08,800 gene. Were there there there were still 141 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,600 outstanding planning comments? Correct. 142 00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:14,080 >> I just need the updated I just need the 143 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:16,160 response to these comments. I don't 144 00:09:16,160 --> 00:09:18,480 think unless we we see something 145 00:09:18,480 --> 00:09:20,959 significant otherwise in your responses. 146 00:09:20,959 --> 00:09:22,959 I don't think it should come back to DRC 147 00:09:22,959 --> 00:09:25,519 once we review those comments. Um but 148 00:09:25,519 --> 00:09:27,839 right now, no. I I I think we have 149 00:09:27,839 --> 00:09:29,519 outstanding comments. I haven't seen the 150 00:09:29,519 --> 00:09:32,800 updated TIA. Uh yeah, it wasn't included 151 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:34,720 with the retrofit, so we didn't include 152 00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:36,640 it with this one, but it does match the 153 00:09:36,640 --> 00:09:37,839 same numbers. 154 00:09:37,839 --> 00:09:39,279 >> Okay. So, at this time, the 155 00:09:39,279 --> 00:09:40,800 recommendation of denial is there's 156 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:42,720 outstanding comments that would need to 157 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:44,959 be addressed prior to approval. Uh 158 00:09:44,959 --> 00:09:46,880 police, 159 00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:48,000 >> no comments. 160 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:49,920 >> Works. No comments. 161 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:50,399 >> Fire, 162 00:09:50,399 --> 00:09:51,360 >> no comments. Thank you. 163 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:51,920 >> And building, 164 00:09:51,920 --> 00:09:53,519 >> no comments. Thank you. 165 00:09:53,519 --> 00:09:56,160 >> Next one is the church, Northwest Church 166 00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:58,160 existing building retrofit first of 167 00:09:58,160 --> 00:09:59,120 middle. 168 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:01,279 This is the first submitt for the 169 00:10:01,279 --> 00:10:04,399 retrofit of the um there is an existing 170 00:10:04,399 --> 00:10:06,800 structure on the property. It's uh about 171 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:10,800 4,000 square ft. Um and as I understand 172 00:10:10,800 --> 00:10:13,120 I just had some comments about is this 173 00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:15,279 an additional 174 00:10:15,279 --> 00:10:18,880 like ancillary place of worship apart 175 00:10:18,880 --> 00:10:21,120 from the one we've seen in the previous 176 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:22,800 submittal. 177 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,519 Um 178 00:10:25,519 --> 00:10:27,600 otherwise I really don't have that many 179 00:10:27,600 --> 00:10:29,519 comments. I just need clarification. I 180 00:10:29,519 --> 00:10:32,320 just I got a little bit confused what 181 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:35,120 the relationship is with this building 182 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,399 and what's being proposed under CSP 183 00:10:38,399 --> 00:10:41,200 2610. 184 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:42,720 >> Right. And the applicant if you don't 185 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:44,079 mind coming up and 186 00:10:44,079 --> 00:10:47,279 >> yeah, Jason is the church representative 187 00:10:47,279 --> 00:10:49,680 and he'll talk a little bit about it. 188 00:10:49,680 --> 00:10:52,160 >> Hey, good morning guys. Um yeah, Jason 189 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:54,640 Gilkkey. I'm an elder at Northwest 190 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:59,360 Church. So, uh, the, as uh, Jean had 191 00:10:59,360 --> 00:11:01,200 shared, we have an existing building 192 00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:04,000 that's been there for 30, 40 plus years. 193 00:11:04,000 --> 00:11:05,200 So, we actually went through the 194 00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:06,640 permitting process and had already 195 00:11:06,640 --> 00:11:08,880 retrofitted the inside of the building 196 00:11:08,880 --> 00:11:12,079 several years ago. So, over the last two 197 00:11:12,079 --> 00:11:14,000 years, we've used this building, kind of 198 00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:16,320 utilized it just for small group, a 199 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:18,240 couple nights a week, things like that. 200 00:11:18,240 --> 00:11:20,480 Um, and we had I'd called in about a 201 00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:22,160 year ago to say, "Hey, we've got our 202 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:24,480 main building project, but we'd love to 203 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:28,240 actually utilize this building now for, 204 00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:29,920 you know, maybe Sunday morning services, 205 00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:33,600 more church type use." No real future I 206 00:11:33,600 --> 00:11:35,519 vision to connect it to the main 207 00:11:35,519 --> 00:11:36,720 project. This would be its own 208 00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:38,800 standalone building that would be used 209 00:11:38,800 --> 00:11:41,200 just for church purposes, general church 210 00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:43,600 use. In the meantime, the the idea was, 211 00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:46,000 you know, we could maybe hold 50 to 100 212 00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:47,920 people at most in there for on a Sunday 213 00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:50,800 morning. Um, we could use it for, you 214 00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:53,279 know, maybe youth stuff, small groups 215 00:11:53,279 --> 00:11:54,959 like we're using. Um, so they had 216 00:11:54,959 --> 00:11:57,360 suggested we we put the parking lot in. 217 00:11:57,360 --> 00:11:59,519 So, that's where this plan came from was 218 00:11:59,519 --> 00:12:01,680 that the uh planning department uh 219 00:12:01,680 --> 00:12:03,279 during our preapp meeting and said that 220 00:12:03,279 --> 00:12:05,920 was what they what they wanted was a uh 221 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:08,160 a paved parking area. 222 00:12:08,160 --> 00:12:10,560 So that's kind of, you know, how this 223 00:12:10,560 --> 00:12:15,920 all came came to be. But it there's no plan to connect it or or to 224 00:12:15,920 --> 00:12:18,160 be a part of our main campus. It's just 225 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:20,160 uh on the same parcel and trying to 226 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:21,600 utilize the existing building that's 227 00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:24,710 there. 228 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:26,399 » Any questions for the applicant? 229 00:12:26,399 --> 00:12:29,440 >> Um question, was a change of use put 230 00:12:29,440 --> 00:12:31,948 through during this process or are 231 00:12:31,948 --> 00:12:32,959 [clears throat] you pushing through now 232 00:12:32,959 --> 00:12:34,720 on it? Because I mean you're going from 233 00:12:34,720 --> 00:12:36,480 what essentially was residential at one 234 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:38,320 point down to now we're talking assembly 235 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:40,320 in the church where we are. So that 236 00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:41,600 should have been a change of use. 237 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:44,320 >> So we were told that the well at least 238 00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:47,200 the underlying parcel this we have a 239 00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:49,600 special exception for church use over 240 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:52,560 the whole parcel. I'm not sure if 241 00:12:52,560 --> 00:12:54,399 there's another process we need to go 242 00:12:54,399 --> 00:12:56,160 through for the specific to the 243 00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:58,240 building. So, 244 00:12:58,240 --> 00:12:59,200 >> okay. 245 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:01,920 >> I mean, it the special exception, Bobby, 246 00:13:01,920 --> 00:13:03,519 is that what is zoned for or that's what 247 00:13:03,519 --> 00:13:04,800 it was changed over to? 248 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:06,639 >> Yeah, special exception allows the use 249 00:13:06,639 --> 00:13:08,639 on the property. I think what you're 250 00:13:08,639 --> 00:13:10,320 getting at is the conversion of the 251 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:12,079 building itself. Absolutely. From one 252 00:13:12,079 --> 00:13:13,440 occupancy class to another. 253 00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:14,800 >> Yes, I do recall the driveway 254 00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:16,560 conversation and all that. I do recall 255 00:13:16,560 --> 00:13:17,920 bringing up that we would have to make 256 00:13:17,920 --> 00:13:19,440 sure this is trans assembly that all 257 00:13:19,440 --> 00:13:20,880 fire codes are going to be applicable to 258 00:13:20,880 --> 00:13:22,880 get corrected. And um I still haven't 259 00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:24,320 been out for an inspection of any 260 00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:25,600 portion of it. So, if there's been any 261 00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:26,959 type of things going on out there, I 262 00:13:26,959 --> 00:13:28,720 think that's something that should be 263 00:13:28,720 --> 00:13:30,320 having me out there, especially if you 264 00:13:30,320 --> 00:13:31,920 guys are holding any type of service as 265 00:13:31,920 --> 00:13:32,880 we speak. 266 00:13:32,880 --> 00:13:35,279 >> Yeah, there's no real services taking 267 00:13:35,279 --> 00:13:37,440 place necessarily, more small groups, 268 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:39,360 things like that in the but still at 269 00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:41,200 that point. I mean, I don't it's 270 00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:42,720 basically being treated as a commercial 271 00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:45,120 building. Correct. 272 00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:47,360 Uh, I guess in some regard, yeah, you 273 00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:48,880 could say I mean it's a church church 274 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:51,839 type use, but if whatever the if you'd 275 00:13:51,839 --> 00:13:53,839 want to come take a look or inspect, 276 00:13:53,839 --> 00:13:55,040 >> I think we could probably meet offline 277 00:13:55,040 --> 00:13:55,760 and 278 00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:56,240 >> sure 279 00:13:56,240 --> 00:13:57,839 >> come up with the plan of figuring out 280 00:13:57,839 --> 00:13:59,360 what we're going to need to do far as a 281 00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:00,880 change of use would go into place to 282 00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:02,639 make sure it's done correctly and then 283 00:14:02,639 --> 00:14:06,000 um far as an inspection and getting that all caught up. So, 284 00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:08,399 >> okay. I know it went through the when it 285 00:14:08,399 --> 00:14:10,000 went through the permitting process 286 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:12,079 before. I think it was looked at in that 287 00:14:12,079 --> 00:14:14,800 way because it does have, you know, fire 288 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:16,959 uh fire alarms and exit signs and 289 00:14:16,959 --> 00:14:19,120 everything else. So, it it seems like it 290 00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:20,480 did go through that process, but happy 291 00:14:20,480 --> 00:14:23,360 to have you take a look at it and see. 292 00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:24,880 >> All right. No problem. 293 00:14:24,880 --> 00:14:27,120 >> That'd be fine. We'll um reach out um 294 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:28,880 I'll get your contact information, reach 295 00:14:28,880 --> 00:14:29,839 out and set up something. 296 00:14:29,839 --> 00:14:31,680 >> Sounds good. 297 00:14:31,680 --> 00:14:32,880 >> Any additional questions for the 298 00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:35,760 applicant? 299 00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:39,040 So the CSP for this retrofit, it really 300 00:14:39,040 --> 00:14:41,360 should also serve your purpose of a 301 00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:44,880 change of use, it looks like I don't 302 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:46,560 recall. I didn't review the change of 303 00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:49,680 use, I guess, when it went through, but 304 00:14:49,680 --> 00:14:51,760 it looks like there was a change of use. 305 00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:54,160 Is that what I'm hearing, John? 306 00:14:54,160 --> 00:14:55,920 >> I think this was years ago. 307 00:14:55,920 --> 00:14:59,509 >> Okay. 308 00:14:59,519 --> 00:15:03,519 » Yeah, it's been quite okay. So, so we'll 309 00:15:03,519 --> 00:15:08,320 this CSP as it should be really we'll treat it as your change of use. 310 00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:10,079 You need to make the comments that you 311 00:15:10,079 --> 00:15:12,320 need to make and treat it as a change of 312 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:14,320 use. It's a redevelopment is really what 313 00:15:14,320 --> 00:15:16,240 it is. 314 00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:18,160 >> I commented on the workflow. Yeah, the 315 00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:20,000 change of use was required. 316 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:21,600 >> So, it should have been that's on our 317 00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:22,720 comments as of right now. 318 00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:23,199 >> Okay. 319 00:15:23,199 --> 00:15:25,519 >> So, 320 00:15:25,519 --> 00:15:27,040 >> all right. Uh sounds like there's 321 00:15:27,040 --> 00:15:28,720 outstanding comments from planning. So 322 00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:30,160 the recommendation at this time would be 323 00:15:30,160 --> 00:15:32,959 denial uh on addressing the comments. 324 00:15:32,959 --> 00:15:33,839 Police 325 00:15:33,839 --> 00:15:34,800 >> no comments. 326 00:15:34,800 --> 00:15:35,920 >> Public works, 327 00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:36,800 >> no comments. 328 00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:37,360 >> Fire, 329 00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:38,480 >> no other comments. Thank you. 330 00:15:38,480 --> 00:15:38,880 >> Building, 331 00:15:38,880 --> 00:15:39,680 >> nothing. Thanks. 332 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:42,160 >> All right. Thank you. Next item on the 333 00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:45,040 agenda is Lester Oaks CSP second submitt 334 00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:49,910 and Amir Hams as the project manager. 335 00:15:49,920 --> 00:15:52,639 » Good morning everyone. So this is a uh 336 00:15:52,639 --> 00:15:54,800 subdivision that consists of uh seven 337 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:57,759 lots. It's uh right off West Lester 338 00:15:57,759 --> 00:16:01,279 Road. The zoning is RSF-1B. U feature 339 00:16:01,279 --> 00:16:04,160 language is residential low suburban. Uh 340 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:05,839 staff and applicant are available for 341 00:16:05,839 --> 00:16:07,040 comments and questions. They are 342 00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:08,720 outstanding comments. So planning and 343 00:16:08,720 --> 00:16:10,720 zoning is recommending denial. 344 00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:12,000 >> All right. Is the applicant in 345 00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:20,550 attendance this morning? Right. 346 00:16:20,560 --> 00:16:22,079 » Good morning. Tom Faber, Faber 347 00:16:22,079 --> 00:16:24,399 Engineering. 348 00:16:24,399 --> 00:16:26,959 Uh don't have much but just want to go 349 00:16:26,959 --> 00:16:29,680 over these last few minor comments. Um I 350 00:16:29,680 --> 00:16:31,839 have been talking with uh planning staff 351 00:16:31,839 --> 00:16:34,320 on their couple comments. I think we've 352 00:16:34,320 --> 00:16:37,759 got a resolution to that uh for the 353 00:16:37,759 --> 00:16:40,800 turnaround. Uh we did add a 5ft sidewalk 354 00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:44,880 out to Leester Road. Um so we we're 355 00:16:44,880 --> 00:16:46,320 planning to extend that to an 8ft 356 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:48,160 sidewalk and that'll go all the way 357 00:16:48,160 --> 00:16:50,399 through our subdivision. Um that'll be a 358 00:16:50,399 --> 00:16:52,480 multi-use trail. Um that should meet 359 00:16:52,480 --> 00:16:55,519 that comment just for the record. Um and 360 00:16:55,519 --> 00:16:59,519 then uh Dale for your comments. Um go 361 00:16:59,519 --> 00:17:03,360 with them all. Um for the inlet, you 362 00:17:03,360 --> 00:17:05,280 know, you wanted three three feet on 363 00:17:05,280 --> 00:17:09,280 both sides of that weir. Um so 364 00:17:09,280 --> 00:17:11,360 it's it's it's a shallower inlet just 365 00:17:11,360 --> 00:17:13,679 based on our constraints there. We we'll 366 00:17:13,679 --> 00:17:15,360 probably just change it to an H inlet or 367 00:17:15,360 --> 00:17:17,280 something along those lines so that we 368 00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:19,120 can we can get it there. But just 369 00:17:19,120 --> 00:17:20,240 letting you know, I think that'll 370 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:22,959 address address your concerns with that. 371 00:17:22,959 --> 00:17:26,079 Um, and then, um, there's a comment here 372 00:17:26,079 --> 00:17:29,520 to add a bleed down at the weir. Uh, 373 00:17:29,520 --> 00:17:31,760 which 374 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:34,720 I wasn't really clear about 375 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:36,400 how that would work because that would 376 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:38,559 really change our design and our 377 00:17:38,559 --> 00:17:39,679 retention. 378 00:17:39,679 --> 00:17:42,559 >> Well, the the comments what I did is I 379 00:17:42,559 --> 00:17:44,320 put the last comment so that I just 380 00:17:44,320 --> 00:17:46,320 what's in red and hopefully it showed up 381 00:17:46,320 --> 00:17:46,640 in red. 382 00:17:46,640 --> 00:17:48,240 >> Uhhuh. Okay. So that comment is 383 00:17:48,240 --> 00:17:48,559 addressed. 384 00:17:48,559 --> 00:17:49,840 >> Yeah, that comment's no longer 385 00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:51,840 >> fantastic. Okay, thank you for 386 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:54,640 clarifying. Um, and then yeah, we'll 387 00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:56,720 create a notch in the burn uh for that 388 00:17:56,720 --> 00:17:59,120 last comment to to outlaw there. We had 389 00:17:59,120 --> 00:18:01,600 some conversations on that uh in that 390 00:18:01,600 --> 00:18:02,640 neighborhood to the south with that 391 00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:07,280 inlet being covered up. Um, so if 392 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:08,720 there's any questions for me, I'm happy 393 00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:10,559 to happy to answer them, but I think we 394 00:18:10,559 --> 00:18:12,559 can address these last few. 395 00:18:12,559 --> 00:18:13,840 >> Any additional questions for the 396 00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:16,640 applicant? All right. As mayor had 397 00:18:16,640 --> 00:18:19,280 indicated, pending residdle comments of 398 00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:20,799 recommendations denial. 399 00:18:20,799 --> 00:18:21,120 >> Thanks. 400 00:18:21,120 --> 00:18:22,960 >> All right. Um, police, 401 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:23,919 >> no comment. 402 00:18:23,919 --> 00:18:24,880 >> Public works, 403 00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:25,679 >> no comments. 404 00:18:25,679 --> 00:18:26,240 >> Fire, 405 00:18:26,240 --> 00:18:27,200 >> no comments. Thank you. 406 00:18:27,200 --> 00:18:27,520 >> Building, 407 00:18:27,520 --> 00:18:28,400 >> I don't have anything. 408 00:18:28,400 --> 00:18:29,760 >> Thank you very much. We'll look forward 409 00:18:29,760 --> 00:18:31,520 to the resubmitt. 410 00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:34,320 >> Any items for discussion? 411 00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:37,520 Hearing God were jerk.