[0:01] Yeah.
[0:03] >> Yeah.
[0:08] » Call this meeting to order. Planning
[0:10] Commission hearing and meetings
[0:11] currently July 8th, 2026 at 6 p.m. We'll
[0:14] start with the pledge of allegiance.
[0:18] » I aliance to the flag of the United
[0:21] States of America and to the republic
[0:24] for which it stands. One nation under
[0:27] God, indivisible, with liberty and
[0:30] justice for all.
[0:34] » Rolloff
[0:36] here.
[0:36] >> Dan Harsh here.
[0:37] >> Bradley F here.
[0:39] >> Here writing here.
[0:41] >> Any conflicts of interest disclose?
[0:43] >> Yeah, I'm related to uh Rick.
[0:47] >> Okay.
[0:48] >> Item number nine. Um I am for the item,
[0:53] but I'm I feel like being related. I can
[0:55] hold on it.
[0:56] >> Okay. Thank you. All right. Moving the
[0:59] hearings. I'll open up the hearing. Item
[1:01] number one, ordinance O202617,
[1:04] adopt title 110255
[1:06] boundary adjustments.
[1:09] Comments. Anyone online?
[1:13] I will close the hearing on item number
[1:15] one, ordinance 0202617 to adopt title
[1:18] 11255 boundary adjustments. Open up the
[1:21] hearing. Item number two, simple lot
[1:23] subdivision application for AB1331.
[1:26] Any comments? Anyone online?
[1:31] All right. I will close the hearing out
[1:34] for item number two, simple lot
[1:36] subdivision application for AV1331.
[1:39] Open up a hearing on item number three,
[1:41] simple lot subdivision application for
[1:43] AB1329F
[1:45] and AB1329G.
[1:47] Any comments? Anyone online?
[1:52] I will close the hearing out on item
[1:54] number three, simple lot subdivision
[1:56] application for AB1329F
[1:59] and AB1329G and open up your hearing on
[2:01] item number four, simple lot subdivision
[2:03] application for AB132A.
[2:06] Final answer online.
[2:11] All right, I will close out the hearing.
[2:13] Item number four, simple law subdivision
[2:15] application for AV132A.
[2:18] We'll open discussion and possible
[2:19] action on item number five, ordinance
[2:21] 0202617
[2:23] to adopt title 11.02055
[2:26] boundary adjustments.
[2:29] So the reason behind this is Jenna
[2:30] actually noticed that we didn't have a
[2:32] good any good ordinances for boundary
[2:34] adjustments while we had some for lock
[2:36] splits and the paperwork for that. So
[2:38] Jenna actually went and and kind of
[2:40] handled this all for us and and uh came
[2:43] up with this ordinance. So now we have
[2:44] some rules and some guidelines in place
[2:46] for boundary adjustments that we didn't
[2:48] have before. Um I read through it. I
[2:51] like everything. I think it looks good.
[2:52] It's pretty straightforward. But do you
[2:54] guys have any comments on it?
[2:57] Now would be the time
[2:59] >> and what type of boundary adjustments
[3:02] >> like lot line adjustments right?
[3:04] >> Just mirrors on all the state codes that
[3:06] are that we follow anyways. So we just
[3:10] >> what type of things would there be a lot
[3:13] of adjustment if the roads were online
[3:16] or
[3:16] >> Yeah. or even if someone like had two
[3:18] lots and wanted to change the the size
[3:20] of the two they're not making a new lot.
[3:23] They're just moving
[3:25] >> lot lines. Okay. Make one bigger or
[3:27] smaller.
[3:28] >> Yeah.
[3:29] >> Right. Yeah, it prevents like um anybody
[3:31] being landlocked or anything like that
[3:33] because they would just have the
[3:34] planning commission kind of has an
[3:36] authority to make sure that you know
[3:38] they see the plat stuff like that.
[3:40] >> Yeah, because as it is right now I don't
[3:42] think we really see them. We're supposed
[3:45] to
[3:45] >> and we don't have to tell you in all my
[3:48] time here I have seen
[3:49] >> Yeah, we're supposed to. This should
[3:52] >> there's a state code that Bradley
[3:54] actually as the planning commission
[3:55] authority has to um sign it but it
[3:58] doesn't have to come through planning
[3:59] commission but now I think this will
[4:01] make it kind of come through planning
[4:02] commission a little bit
[4:04] >> tidier
[4:04] >> yeah a little tidier
[4:07] >> I like it thank you Jenn
[4:11] » all right
[4:12] >> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance
[4:15] uh old-2026-17
[4:19] title item.2.05
[4:23] boundary adjustments.
[4:25] >> Second.
[4:26] >> Motion second. Let's take a vote.
[4:27] >> I.
[4:29] >> Motion carried. On to item number six,
[4:32] simple lot subdivision application for
[4:34] AV1331.
[4:36] This is Aaron Stout at the Gooberry
[4:38] Lodges. If you guys remember, he came in
[4:40] about six months ago. Did preliminary
[4:42] platin event center. We approved it. He
[4:46] since realized he needed a bit more
[4:47] space for parking and he bought two
[4:49] acres next door that ordered it. Um, and
[4:52] when he did that, they did a lot split
[4:54] and he was not aware, I guess, at the
[4:56] time that he needed to do a lot split
[4:58] application. So, we told him he had to
[5:00] come back in and do it. This isn't, you
[5:02] know, given any zoning or anything. It's
[5:04] still OST. It's none of that. It's just
[5:06] we're we're kind of fixing the mistake
[5:09] that was made. Um, as of now, you know,
[5:12] it can't be built on. It can't be
[5:13] anything. It's just an OST lot,
[5:16] >> right?
[5:18] >> But he's still allowed to do his parking
[5:19] there, right?
[5:21] >> Yeah, that's my understanding.
[5:22] Preliminary right now is what he told us
[5:24] is a beef parking. That's fine, but
[5:26] we're not, you know, there's no zone
[5:27] change on it right now. We're not going
[5:29] to allow you to expand your bill. You
[5:31] know, he still has to follow his
[5:31] preliminary flat everything. This
[5:33] doesn't change that. I made that very
[5:35] clear with him that just fixing the law
[5:38] split that you
[5:38] >> already followed that law. We kind of
[5:40] questioned the parking on the first.
[5:42] >> We did
[5:44] pretty tight.
[5:44] >> Yeah. So, as I we kind of left with him
[5:47] is that as long as you know you're not
[5:49] you can't change anything. You have to
[5:50] know that sticks with the preliminary
[5:51] plan everything that we approved and he
[5:53] was good with it. So, he came in and did
[5:55] the application. So,
[5:58] >> I'll make a motion that we approve the
[6:00] simple lot application AB-1331
[6:04] for Aaron Stout.
[6:06] >> Second.
[6:06] >> Motion. Second. Let's take a vote. I
[6:08] >> I motion carries. On to item number
[6:12] seven, simple lot subdivision
[6:14] application for AV1329F and AV1329G.
[6:19] This is kind of a similar situation. Um
[6:22] the wells had bought this property and
[6:24] it was originally 160 acre parcel. They
[6:27] bought 80 acres and bought another 80.
[6:29] And the original owner when he did this
[6:32] lot split it. Um, but now that the wells
[6:35] own it, we've asked them, hey, like you
[6:36] need to come in and fix this. This needs
[6:38] to be corrected. And they've been, of
[6:39] course, willing to help and willing to
[6:41] come in and do it. Same thing at zone
[6:43] OST. Um, not giving any zoning or
[6:46] anything like that. It's just the
[6:47] previous owner made it two 80acre
[6:49] parcels and now they're having to come
[6:51] in and fix kind of the mistake, but they
[6:53] are fixing it and cooperating. So,
[6:55] that's nice. So, we'll just have after
[6:56] this it'll just be two 80acre parcels
[6:59] that are OST. So, not really a lot
[7:02] changing, but they're just doing doing
[7:04] what's necessary.
[7:08] You guys got any questions? I actually
[7:10] think they're on here right now online
[7:11] if we have any questions, but I think
[7:13] it's pretty pretty straightforward.
[7:21] » You guys good with it?
[7:23] >> Yeah. So, yeah.
[7:24] >> Just to the east of there.
[7:27] >> Uh, yeah. It's actually a little lower
[7:28] than where their subdivision is. Uh
[7:31] >> sort of behind Walters.
[7:33] >> Yeah. More behind Walters. Yeah.
[7:36] >> But
[7:38] >> Yeah.
[7:38] >> All right. Then you go ahead.
[7:40] >> Yeah. Are we approving?
[7:42] >> Yeah.
[7:42] >> Okay. I'll make a motion that we approve
[7:44] the simple lot subdivision application
[7:46] AV1329-f
[7:49] AB1329-G.
[7:52] The law split for TLW Investments LLC.
[7:56] >> Second. Motion second. Second vote.
[7:58] >> I motion carry.
[8:02] On to item number eight, simple lot
[8:06] subdivision application for AB1328A.
[8:10] This is about a 60acre parcel. It's
[8:12] right at the end of
[8:14] um
[8:16] Daybreak Mesa.
[8:18] They are splitting up into two parcels.
[8:21] No road going through, nothing like
[8:23] that. I did talk with the engineer Zach
[8:24] that when we had this whole water issue
[8:27] go on um our engineer Nate at Sunrise
[8:30] recommend that a possible outcome is to
[8:32] take the water line up Main Street and
[8:34] connect it over to the water line on
[8:36] Daybreak Mesa. So I already talked with
[8:38] Zach and told him that part of this was
[8:40] we would say that we need a 26 foot
[8:42] public utility easement um to connect
[8:44] Main Street to Daybreak Mesa however
[8:46] they see fit. We don't we don't really
[8:48] care. Obviously shortage route is better
[8:50] for us but whatever works. Um, and they
[8:52] said that'd be no problem. Everything
[8:54] else on it seems good to me. That was
[8:56] the only thing. And so when if we make a
[8:59] motion, we'll have to put clarify in the
[9:01] motion that we need that easement. But
[9:03] >> why don't you do the motion then?
[9:05] >> All right. Anyone have
[9:06] >> But I I got some comments on that one.
[9:09] >> Uh, this one was brought up before
[9:11] slightly different. They were going to
[9:12] pass it through into Main Street. I'm
[9:14] glad they they stopped it from going
[9:16] into Main Street. I know there's a lot
[9:18] of public sentiment in the town about
[9:20] going from at connecting with that Main
[9:23] Street on that and I'd like to have some
[9:26] sort of a wording uh where we have to
[9:28] have an impact study before they can
[9:30] ever connect it in the future to Main
[9:33] Street.
[9:34] >> Okay. Yeah, we they've been very easy to
[9:36] work with. They've made whatever changes
[9:39] we need. So, I I don't see a problem
[9:41] with that, but we could definitely put
[9:42] something like that in the motion.
[9:44] >> Okay. Yeah. I just I just know there's a huge public sentiment about uh acting
[9:49] up to that. So, I just want to make sure
[9:51] we have as much protection as we can.
[9:55] >> Okay. Anyone else got any questions or
[9:59] comments for the engineer or the
[10:00] applicant? If not, I'll make a motion.
[10:04] >> All right. Then I'll make a motion we
[10:06] approve the simple lot subdivision
[10:07] application for AB1328A
[10:10] pending. They give us a 26 foot wide
[10:13] public utility easement connecting Main
[10:15] Street to Daybreak Mesa. And if in the
[10:18] future there's ever an interest of
[10:19] connecting that road that there is an
[10:20] impact study done and we understand what
[10:23] that could be like.
[10:25] >> Second.
[10:26] >> Motion second. Let's take a vote.
[10:28] >> I I
[10:28] >> I motion carries.
[10:31] >> Thank you for
[10:32] >> Thank you.
[10:34] All right. On to item number nine.
[10:36] condition use permit application for
[10:37] Rick Trimmer. He's requesting for
[10:40] approval of a condition use permit to
[10:41] allow three single family dwellings to
[10:44] operate a short-term rentals on proposed
[10:45] lots 103 um located northeast of Ranch
[10:49] Road in the A 20 zone. If you remember
[10:52] this last meeting or maybe the one
[10:54] before I came in and we did the zone
[10:56] change and the lot split and all that.
[10:58] Um what he's wanted to do is just put a
[11:00] house on the three different parcels
[11:01] that we hit lot split and uh which is
[11:04] fine, but he's wanting them to be
[11:05] conditional use permit and or sorry
[11:08] short-term rentals and our our ordinance
[11:10] says you can't be within 300 ft of each
[11:13] other. I think it is
[11:16] >> meets that. But it's also um our
[11:18] ordinance allowed me to only have one
[11:20] >> okay rental and this will allow him to
[11:22] have three short-term rentals in the
[11:24] town of Apple Valley
[11:25] >> because I think the 300 but
[11:28] >> whatever. Yeah,
[11:29] >> both of those basically.
[11:30] >> So he he talked to the, you know, the
[11:33] only house around it is his house
[11:35] already that he owns and the property
[11:36] that you drive through um sold him the
[11:39] land and is very understanding of what's
[11:41] going on that he wants to do a
[11:42] short-term rental. So, yeah, he does
[11:44] have to have a conditional use permit,
[11:46] but I feel like as long as the the
[11:48] neighbor, which is him, as well as the property owner is good with it and
[11:52] everyone's in in agreeance with it, I
[11:54] don't see any issues with it. I'm I'm
[11:55] happy to grant it to him. But
[11:57] >> this is a bubbling Wells area, right?
[11:59] >> Yeah. Yep.
[12:00] >> He's got that shortterm rental that's on
[12:01] the hill.
[12:02] >> It's right next to
[12:04] >> How many other short-term rentals are
[12:06] out that way?
[12:07] >> Um, he's got the one on the hill
[12:09] currently. I think he is a short-term
[12:11] rental.
[12:12] >> Yeah, he does. Yeah, but they're all
[12:13] basically greater than 300 ft and
[12:16] they're not really in a subdivision or
[12:18] anything. So, he's just asking to have
[12:20] more than one short-term rental in the
[12:23] town of Apple Valley. And I think he
[12:25] eventually wants to bring his kids
[12:27] there. He's like doing this.
[12:28] >> Yeah, that's the goal. It's to be a
[12:29] family compound. He just
[12:31] >> he just how he has to make it
[12:33] financially work.
[12:36] Yeah. Is that my only concern is it if
[12:39] it's shortterm rentals with those
[12:41] private roads out there so that could be
[12:43] a
[12:46] >> when you start having people traveling
[12:48] on private rooms there.
[12:50] >> Well, the mayor better get those roads
[12:52] dedicated time.
[12:59] » No. Is that the one Forest has been
[13:00] commenting on in our emails?
[13:02] >> Yes. He made a couple complaints. Um,
[13:05] I've talked with the applicant, the
[13:07] engineer. I I think we got all our ducks
[13:10] in a row. Um,
[13:11] >> I don't think there's any problems. If
[13:13] there was, we wouldn't have put it on
[13:14] the agenda, but uh, some people just
[13:16] like to complain a little bit,
[13:18] >> you know, right? As long as you got
[13:20] >> Yeah.
[13:20] >> make sure everything.
[13:22] >> Yeah. I think everything's good. Me and
[13:23] Jenna both review it. I I think we have
[13:25] all our
[13:25] >> back home. They They're new
[13:28] construction.
[13:29] >> Yeah. Yeah. Rent, they'll be all new.
[13:31] >> And it's a higher end. It's not a little
[13:34] cracker box nightly rental.
[13:36] >> Everything out there is high.
[13:38] >> Yeah, even that one he already has up
[13:39] there. It's really nice.
[13:41] >> So the crowd
[13:44] fire
[13:49] » roadway, you know,
[13:53] » they like to have
[13:56] >> Yeah, the applicant is very been very
[13:59] workable. Made the road up to higher
[14:00] standards. everything everything we've
[14:02] asked he's done. Um so I think as far as
[14:04] access and everything goes it's safe
[14:06] really the only thing is he'll have
[14:08] three instead of one you know um which I
[14:12] don't think is a big deal but
[14:13] >> this one on that same well that was
[14:16] discussed last time.
[14:17] >> Yeah.
[14:19] I mean it's at the end of the day it's
[14:21] four houses on 80 acres total or even
[14:23] more than that 100 acres. So
[14:26] >> that's what we like right.
[14:28] >> Yeah. Super low density. Uh you guys
[14:31] don't have any problems with it or
[14:32] questions and we could just make a
[14:34] motion.
[14:38] » You want to do it?
[14:39] >> Yeah, I'll re or I'll make a motion that
[14:41] we approve CUP application AB1361-B
[14:46] AB1361-d
[14:50] second.
[14:50] >> Motion second. Second vote.
[14:52] >> I
[14:55] motion carries. All right. Onto the
[14:57] minutes of June 10th, 2026 planning
[14:59] commission hearing meeting. I looked at
[15:01] them. They all look good. I didn't see
[15:03] any issues unless you guys did.
[15:07] All right. Well, then I make a motion we
[15:09] approve the minutes of June 10th, 2026
[15:11] planning commission hearing and meeting
[15:14] second.
[15:16] >> That lead.
[15:18] >> Motion to second. Take a vote.
[15:20] >> I I
[15:21] >> I
[15:22] >> motion carries.
[15:24] >> Motion we adjourn. Second motion second
[15:27] take a vote I
[15:30] >> meeting