[1:22] I'd like to order call to order the
committee the whole meeting for August
[1:26] 10th, 2026 at 4:30 p.m.
First order of business is disclosure of
[1:31] pecuniary interest and the general
nature thereof.
[1:36] I see two hands go up.
Councilor Stubbs, are you there?
[1:40] » I'm going to be declaring a conflict of
interest uh
[1:45] » Okay. Councilor Shine, I expect the
same?
[1:48] » Yes. Thank you, Mayor Ferguson.
>> Okay. That's noted. Thank you.
[1:54] Any other disclosure of pecuniary
interest or the general nature thereof
[1:58] can be declared now or any time during
the meeting.
[2:02] We have no delegations for tonight. So,
we'll get to Committee of the Whole
[2:06] reports, and first up is
Administration and Employee Relations
[2:12] and we'll CAO report. We'll turn it over
to CAO Young.
[2:17] » Thank you, Mayor Ferguson. So, included
in your package today is the update for
[2:22] July and August. Unfortunately, I have
limited staff here today, but uh myself
[2:27] or Brandy will do our best to answer any
questions that you may have.
[2:32] » Any questions from anybody regarding the
report?
[2:35] Yes, Councillor Lyons.
>> Thank you, Mayor Ferguson. Um I do have
[2:39] a couple of questions about the report.
Um maybe I'll start with the Mud Lake
[2:42] culvert. In there, you noted that um
there's a delay in the the construction
[2:48] schedule. Do we have an anticipated
start date for
[2:51] the contractor?
>> Unofficially, unofficially, um
[2:55] we're hoping by the end of this month.
>> Okay.
[2:57] » We've had some renewed communication, so
it sounds like they are getting um
[3:00] organized. So, fingers crossed end of
the month.
[3:02] » Okay, and you're not anticipating any
impacts to timing for the construction
[3:07] window. It'll still be completed this
year.
[3:08] » Okay.
Um if I may,
[3:13] uh another question I had was regarding
the GFL.
[3:18] Um
the financial implications, so this
[3:20] might be
a question for yourself and Treasurer
[3:23] Colson.
So,
[3:26] looking at this,
um
[3:29] we've received notice from GFL
about an increase in the commercial
[3:34] institutional
cost
[3:38] that the town is paying.
Correct?
[3:41] » So, you're you're referencing uh the GFL
recycle collection?
[3:45] » Yes.
>> So, we're that's not in the update. If
[3:47] we could If we could wait till that.
>> Absolutely. Absolutely. We can come back
[3:51] to that.
>> Sure.
[3:51] » And then just another quick question
regarding the outdoor rinks. Um I think
[3:56] that's great that they are getting some
improvements. Um just what type of
[4:00] improvements will we see for the winter
season or we anticipating seeing?
[4:03] » So there was some plumbing work
in the Don Park shack that I think was a
[4:09] bit of a deterrent last It was one of
the reasons possibly for the delay last
[4:13] year.
That's all been done. There's been some
[4:15] interior work
at Lone Pine as well as the rink itself.
[4:20] And then we are looking at see if we can
sneak in painting the the shack before
[4:25] the the winter season as well.
>> Okay. Thank you.
[4:27] » Painting the exterior as well.
>> We're hoping to, yeah. Yeah.
[4:32] » Councillor Martin.
[4:45] » This is a good question. So
from what I understand they still meet
[4:49] quite regularly.
Linda represents the town and she tries
[4:53] to make it to those meetings. I think
they've they've
[4:56] found what what we already know in a lot
of projects. It's hard to get
[5:01] engaged
professionals to to provide those
[5:05] services. So I think as far as the
engineering goes I think that they've
[5:08] run into some challenges getting people
to help them with the engineering or of
[5:13] the initial design.
They are currently challenged or
[5:16] continue to
do some fundraising
[5:20] and to find that. So
it's moving along slowly.
[5:30] So the council had
had directed staff to
[5:35] direct them towards Centennial Park. So
Centennial Park is still the preferred
[5:38] location and again depending on what
what they want to
[5:43] design there's room for expansion in in
different areas like that. So I would
[5:47] assume that once they get to a point
where they have some um
[5:50] engineer drawings or designs that
they'll they'll we'll report back to
[5:54] council with that.
>> Okay.
[5:56] I I just thought we're tearing up a
couple of streets. Like, could some of
[6:01] that fill go to that location? Uh you
know, like it's subgrade kind of
[6:05] material for those jump jumps and what
have you, I would imagine.
[6:09] I'm not a dirt expert. Uh I have
experience in manure.
[6:14] Works well.
>> The problem is you wouldn't want to
[6:18] create
a partially done project that might sit
[6:21] there for an extended period of time cuz
you could create issues there as well.
[6:24] So, I think they'll probably wait till
they have something firm and committed
[6:27] before they would actually move on it.
>> [clears throat]
[6:32] » Councilor Shannon.
>> Thank you, Mayor Ferguson. Um my
[6:34] question is in regards to the pool since
um the RFP and things are moving a
[6:39] little bit slower, are you still
planning to be open by the end of
[6:42] August? And if you aren't, what are you
going to do about the patrons? Will they
[6:46] get an extra month somewhere fit in
there if they paid ahead of time?
[6:51] » I don't
I don't know how many people have paid
[6:55] ahead of time sort of thing. Um we we
would look at that if if it came around.
[6:59] We are looking at early September for if
all goes well to to be opened up again.
[7:03] If we can't get all of the repairs done
um in that amount of time, then we will
[7:07] schedule them at a later date.
>> Okay. Thank you.
[7:12] » Councilor Johnson.
>> Thank you, Mayor Ferguson. Uh in lieu of
[7:16] uh
Tyler's vacancy, but I
[7:20] respect why.
Um
[7:23] is there an update on the street
sweeper?
[7:26] » Um so, both the street sweeper and
street sweeper and the sidewalk machine
[7:31] were both down. The sidewalk machine is
up and running with the with the brush
[7:35] on there. They've been utilizing that in
some of the bad areas.
[7:38] Uh the
street sweeper itself is still under
[7:41] repairs.
Uh and we do not have an estimated time
[7:44] when that will be
finished. Yeah, it's unfortunate, but
[7:48] once they get in there right and they
start looking a little deeper, there's
[7:50] there's a lot of work that needs to be
done with it.
[7:52] » And my second question is, I see the
track dozer is in for repairs. Would we
[7:58] be privy to the final cost of that them
repairs?
[8:03] » Yeah, I don't have that information with
me, but I mean certainly once they're
[8:05] done that's information that we could be
we could find for you.
[8:08] » Thank you.
[8:15] » Thank you, Grayson.
A lot going on, so
[8:20] good report and good questions. Thank
you. So, we'll move on to the next
[8:24] [snorts] one is NWMO federal impact
assessment update.
[8:30] » Okay, so as council members, that was a
discussion shortly after the NOMA
[8:35] conference end of April, and
staff was able to with the help of of
[8:41] some council to to get the request into
the impact registry, and
[8:46] happy to happy to report that those
submissions were
[8:49] I think successful in the sense that we
are now
[8:53] specifically mentioned in the in the
registry. I think that's a really
[8:57] important
uh uh determination because and and
[9:00] almost immediately we found a change of
of tone and discussion with NWMO and
[9:08] other people because of that now. So, I
think it's very important that we are we
[9:12] are listed in that, and it'll be it'll
help us moving forward.
[9:16] Yeah.
>> Again, the
[9:18] talk discussions I've had with NWMO
since has been much a lot more substance
[9:24] to it.
And a lot more professional as opposed
[9:27] to just giving us an update on what's
going on.
[9:30] They've been working with us on that, so
>> Yeah, we're also trying to coordinate
[9:35] uh, a session hopefully at the end of
September for them to come down and and
[9:40] give everyone a a presentation and an
update and give you guys an opportunity
[9:43] to ask some questions. So, we're
currently trying to schedule that for
[9:46] the end of September.
[9:50] » Can I get a mic closer?
[9:53] » Okay. Any other questions for Jason on
that?
[9:57] Okay.
Seeing none, we'll move on to
[10:01] finance, public works, GFL recycle
collection.
[10:06] Jason.
>> Yep. So, um, I understand uh, Counselor
[10:10] Lyons has a has a question too on that.
So, uh,
[10:14] I'll take any questions and then be able
to hopefully explain anything if we can.
[10:20] » Ryan or Counselor Stephenson.
>> I'll let
[10:22] » Oh, okay. Go ahead, Counselor Lyons.
>> Yes, my question regarding um, this was
[10:28] what sort of financial implications are
uh, coming out of this recommendation?
[10:32] Specifically,
um,
[10:35] I know that there was money budgeted for
this year,
[10:39] but with the excess
of recycling for commercial
[10:44] institutional,
um,
[10:47] I guess the question is,
what can we expect for this year? How
[10:51] how far have we exceeded that 11 tons?
>> Yeah, it's it's tough to tell right now
[10:56] cuz we haven't done a full year.
>> Mhm.
[10:58] » Um, and these are all
uh,
[11:01] estimates, right? So, so we won't really
know until until we go through a couple
[11:05] cycles for that. Uh, the nice thing is
is that we are getting the annual rent
[11:09] um, for the depot itself.
Uh, and and again, we
[11:13] we are hoping that that revenue will
offset any sort of expenses
[11:17] um, after those 12 scheduled pickups,
after that 11.097 tons of pickup, uh, we
[11:23] believe that there will be um, earned
revenues that will be able to pay for
[11:26] those expenses honestly. And then uh,
again, trying to figure out um,
[11:31] uh, possibly purchasing or or renting an
extra couple bins so that we can keep
[11:35] the flow going.
It's It's too It's too
[11:40] soon to really be able to tell. Um
Having said that, I think it's a great
[11:44] opportunity to to bring forward that
we need to lobby the provincial
[11:49] government that the IC&I, the industrial
commercial portion, was was overlooked
[11:55] in this circular materials transfer and
we're not the only municipality saying
[11:59] saying that. And and and I hope that the
province will understand their oversight
[12:03] on that matter and that there'll be some
changes coming for that.
[12:07] We're still committed to cuz we're
seeing um
[12:11] the direct benefit of that being
diverted from our landfill. So, you
[12:15] know, we we do There is a cost for us to
go around and pick all that up. We
[12:19] believe that's money well spent in the
sense that we are diverting that. It is
[12:23] probably being recycled with the hope
that the province will
[12:27] understand their oversight and and be
able to fund that to a certain degree.
[12:30] So, it it'll be hard for us to know
until we've gone through a cycle or two,
[12:34] but we believe the revenue will offset
any
[12:37] possible expenses.
>> Is this something that could be raised
[12:39] through NOMA or AMO?
>> Absolutely, yeah. I mean, I think this
[12:43] is a great a great delegation request
moving forward or any opportunity that
[12:47] you have to lobby that. I think that
I'm sure they're well aware because I
[12:52] think a lot of municipalities are having
those same discussions and the larger
[12:56] the city probably even more so, but
yeah, I agree. Yeah.
[13:00] » Yeah, I can just if I can just speak to
that.
[13:03] I was really surprised I think it was
AMO last year and I went to a
[13:08] session on this. And there's there's
people that haul their garbage 500 km
[13:15] to
to the landfill and then they're having
[13:17] to deal with all the indust- the ICI
stuff, too. So,
[13:22] I I would really surprise me and at how
much there was to haul and
[13:29] and how passionate a lot of the people
were. So, we're getting a lot of There's
[13:33] a getting a lot of traffic on this and
and I don't know if it was an oversight
[13:36] or it was a plan by the province, but
they are getting pushed back on this.
[13:40] So, we're hopefully we can see some some
movement on that because I think it is
[13:44] the right thing to do collect it. Uh
even though it's for the towns are doing
[13:49] it, but uh
just want to encourage all the all the
[13:53] residents in town if you can You can put
as much as you want at your curb and
[13:58] they will pick it up every Monday.
So,
[14:01] and I and I understand people that might
miss the recycle truck and they're going
[14:05] out to the dump. So, they throw their
recycle bags in our bins, which is
[14:10] a good thing to do, but uh
if we could put it out at the road the
[14:14] residents could put it out at the road.
That's that'd be a big savings for for
[14:18] the town and and stop the the amount
that's going to
[14:21] » Yeah, it helps us
We don't want to reach our 11.097
[14:26] times too quickly, right? So,
if we can have if if if you're putting
[14:30] that curbside that doesn't go towards
that, which is good for us. So, it
[14:33] stretches that out. Yeah.
>> Councillor Johnson, sorry.
[14:37] » Mr. Mayor Ferguson, excuse me.
Jason, do we realize any monies from the
[14:42] electronic collection cuz they they do
have a value?
[14:48] » I will have to get that information for
you. I'm not sure.
[14:51] » Okay.
>> Yeah, I know with there used to be like
[14:53] stewardship for the rubber tires and and
there is there is revenue associated
[14:57] with the white metals.
The electric electronics there might be
[15:01] a small
um
[15:03] revenue off that, but I don't know.
Yeah, I'll look. I'll I'll get back to
[15:07] you guys on that.
[15:10] » Councillor Knowles.
>> Yeah, thank you, Mayor Ferguson. I'm
[15:14] just
I'm trying to wrap my head around this.
[15:17] Um
we are certain that all of the recycling
[15:20] being put out is residential.
Um I'm just I'm confused by the fact
[15:24] that we seem to have lower than average
curbside collection,
[15:29] but that we would be worried that people
would be bringing an average of almost 1
[15:33] ton of recycling out on the highway
um to make up for that because they
[15:39] missed recycling day that happens every
week. So, I'm just I'm trying to wrap my
[15:42] mind around
the sheer amount of recyclables that it
[15:46] would take to make 1 ton average per
month. It's
[15:50] up in excess.
>> So, it it is based
[15:53] So, again, there's a lot of estimates
happening.
[15:56] Um and then and then we try and do a
a calculation on
[15:59] residents who do not have access to
curbside pickup, and then that forms the
[16:04] basis for the the rental of the depot at
the landfill. So, to to our benefit,
[16:09] um
but we as you said, we do mix the IC&I
[16:13] into that, and that's why we're
we're agreeable to pay the excess of
[16:18] that.
Um the other the other option would be
[16:21] is is to either not collect the IC&I, um
have it completely separate, and we
[16:27] would fund all that, which at the end of
the day would mean that we would have to
[16:30] pass those costs along to those business
owners, and the fear is then it's going
[16:34] to go into the into the landfill. So, uh
not a perfect system by any means. It's
[16:38] new. There's a lot of estimates in
there.
[16:41] Uh the icing for us is that again, we're
not paying until we hit that um
[16:47] that tonnage.
>> Yeah, I'm just curious how that would
[16:50] separate between the residential um
and and the IC&I.
[16:54] » Yeah, so So, basically, what we've done
is we've we're we're not separating.
[16:57] We're putting it all together, and then
we'll we'll just pay anything extra
[17:00] above above that. Yeah. So, if if it
doesn't reach that,
[17:04] that's great for us as well.
>> Thank you. Appreciate that.
[17:09] » Just to Counselor Johnson's question, we
we used to receive money for electronic
[17:15] um recycling years ago, but then with
all the changes with Stewardship of
[17:19] Ontario and and the program changes, we
haven't received it for a few years. It
[17:23] wasn't much anyway, so it it's not a
significant impact, but how that program
[17:29] changed, I don't know with with all the
changes with all the other
[17:33] stewardships.
[17:38] » Uh so,
just just one thing I want to say
[17:42] because I I I don't know if I spurred
this or Jason was working on it before,
[17:46] but
I went to I went to the landfill with a
[17:49] truckload, bought a $20 token. There's
somebody there with a
[17:54] Ranger truck full of old wood in the
back of his truck.
[17:58] And he was giving me
the gears a little bit about having to
[18:02] pay $20 to take this old wood out of in
his little truck. And then another
[18:06] person had some old wood and some
electronics.
[18:10] And he said he bought a ticket dub
token. And he said, "Yeah, well, it cost
[18:14] money." He said, "I bought a token,
too." So, the three of us
[18:18] carpool or not carpool, convoyed out
there. The guy that just had the wood in
[18:23] the back of his truck, he was directed
to the wood pile, dumped for free,
[18:27] didn't cost him anything because it's
wood. Uh the other guy that had some old
[18:32] wood and some electronics, he dumped the
wood in the wood pile, the electronics
[18:37] in the bin, and he didn't have to pay
anything. So, I know it does sound like
[18:43] $20 for this and $20 for that, but if
people that separate their material and
[18:48] they they work the dump the way it
should be worked,
[18:52] they were both
both came up to me and said, "You know,
[18:55] we're sorry about that. We didn't
realize it was free, so
[18:59] uh
yeah, garbage my my truck was garbage. I
[19:02] paid the $20, but uh yeah, if you
recycle, throw your steel in, throw your
[19:08] wood in, your electronics in, you can
take a lot of stuff to the dump and not
[19:12] have to pay anything.
So, that's my little story on that, my
[19:17] one trip to the dump every year.
Uh
[19:21] do we want to discuss options? Do we
want to continue with GFL collection and
[19:25] processing of recyclable materials
exceeding the annual allocation,
[19:30] disposal of recycled material in the
landfill,
[19:34] or remove the current fee structure for
commercial recycling services as part of
[19:38] future update of the waste management
bylaw?
[19:42] Uh
I would I would I would My
[19:45] recommendation was we continue with
doing what we're doing.
[19:49] Unless anybody has any other comments.
We want to encourage recycling. Uh go
[19:54] ahead, Councillor Lines.
>> Uh thank you, Mayor Ferguson. I would
[19:56] agree with continuing with the GFL
collection and processing status quo,
[20:01] um but maybe after a few cycles, see
what the actual costs are associated
[20:06] with this process, and at that point,
look and see if there's any sort of uh
[20:11] review.
>> Yeah.
[20:12] » And maybe in that time, too, is the
province will make some changes and they
[20:17] will start recouping some of that money
as well.
[20:20] » Absolutely.
>> We carry on?
[20:22] Okay. Great.
Okay, next we'll move to fire and
[20:26] property.
Fire dispatch agreement with Central
[20:30] Ambulance Communication Centre.
Jason.
[20:34] » Okay. So, um
yeah, as part of the the centralized um
[20:38] communication system for fire dispatch,
that is done out of Kenora. Uh that is
[20:44] separate than the next gen 911 that is
is being transitioned as well. Um this
[20:50] is a long-standing agreement with uh
this organization.
[20:54] Um I don't I don't believe there are
other options in a sense. This is this
[21:00] is the This is the company that does it
for the region. Uh very well established
[21:04] with our fire department and and um
regional fire departments as well. So,
[21:08] uh unfortunately, Chief Orban's not here
today to answer any specifics. I don't
[21:12] have
I don't have any financials for you
[21:17] other than I don't believe that there's
any change in
[21:19] the the cost of that, but we could get
that for you as well.
[21:24] » Any questions on that? Yes, Councillor
Johnson.
[21:27] » Thank you, Mayor Buergler. Brandy, you
you wouldn't have a
[21:31] guestimate of what this costs?
[21:35] » Not offhand, but it isn't very much.
It's it's not significant.
[21:39] » Not that I don't
understand where Jason's coming from. I
[21:43] just thought
Brandy would know.
[21:48] » Any other questions on that?
Uh hearing no questions, the
[21:53] recommendation is to continue continue
on with CCAC for a 5-year term based on
[21:58] the agreement attached.
[22:01] Is that the consensus of council?
Okay, see heads nodding. Most heads
[22:07] nodding.
Okay, great. And I think we will have a
[22:12] resolution for that.
Bylaw.
[22:18] Okay, next we'll go to other business.
Uh Ad Hoc Bass Classic requests wave
[22:24] fees report to council.
Jason and the people that have declared
[22:32] a conflict.
[22:35] Just to note that Councillor Johnson has
also declared conflict on this.
[22:41] Yes.
[22:43] Or or you're just leaving.
>> [laughter]
[22:48] » Okay, that is always the best way. Thank
you, Councillor.
[22:57] Okay, Jason.
>> Okay,
[22:59] so Uh, we are as of Monday into full
swing of Bass Classic Week, the 40th
[23:04] anniversary. Uh, I know events were
already starting to take place uh, this
[23:07] morning. Um, as always, there is a
request to the town for certain uh,
[23:12] in-kind um,
uh,
[23:17] different things that they need from
from the town. Uh,
[23:20] not a whole lot of change from the
previous year. Um,
[23:24] one important note is that the the
town's event tent is not needed this
[23:28] year.
Which is which is good in the sense that
[23:32] we don't have to set it up. I think
they're they're moving the artisans and
[23:35] and such um,
under the big top. So, uh, so that's
[23:39] good for us. I know that we're already
delivering porta-potties and um,
[23:44] and uh, yeah, that's about it. So, I
think at the end of the day the and and
[23:48] if um, you'll recall
uh, administration was was asked to
[23:53] bring forth a uh, a report showing the
uh,
[23:58] in-kind costs, actual costs, foregone
revenue. Um, that was presented to
[24:03] council. I believe it was June of this
year, early June of this year, early
[24:06] June. Um, so everyone's well aware of
that there is a there is a cost
[24:10] associated with this um, but um,
council is of the mindset that that's
[24:15] um, um, appropriate for for the event.
Uh, so the only matter really kind of
[24:20] outstanding today uh, because it is in
the fees bylaw is if I or um, the
[24:26] committee's request to forego the rental
charges for the porta-potties um, for
[24:32] the event. And and there are I think a
couple porta-potties out at the landing
[24:36] and then the remainder of them uh, over
uh, by the by the big tent.
[24:41] So, uh, that's in a nutshell, that's
kind of what what the the request does.
[24:46] Um,
right, today the the the options are are
[24:50] to uh,
approve the town's operational support
[24:53] at the same levels provided in 2025. Um,
determine whether to waive the port
[24:58] potty washroom rental fees
or if there's a
[25:03] any sort of change or anything different
that that council would be looking at.
[25:06] That's what we're asking for today.
[25:10] » Councilor
Councilor Knowles
[25:14] » Thank you, Mayor Ferguson. I got no
problem with uh
[25:18] continuing on the same as 2025 and
waving the fees, um
[25:23] but maybe a request that they submit
this a little bit
[25:26] earlier than, you know, the day it
starts
[25:29] for next year.
>> And and that's that's that's on me, not
[25:32] them. So,
we they were they were pretty good. Um
[25:34] they've they've had good com-
communication with us. Uh just with the
[25:37] way the summer schedule fell out, we
just missed the uh the other meetings,
[25:41] so we we had to tack it on to knowing
that it was the week after.
[25:44] » More of it's ever an issue moving
forward with a future council that they
[25:48] would have an opportunity to be able to
deal with anything that may come up. But
[25:51] I have no issues with it.
>> Yeah, it's granted. Granted. Appreciate
[25:54] that.
>> Councilor Lines
[25:57] » I concur with Councilor Knowles. I fully
support waving of the fees and um
[26:02] continuing with the level of service
that we provide in 2025. Um just noting
[26:07] that we waived those fees because of the
nonprofit status.
[26:12] » Uh
>> Uh
[26:13] » I don't know about that.
>> Okay.
[26:15] » [laughter]
>> They they state in the request that they
[26:18] have nonprofit status. We we don't we've
never asked for proof of that. Uh
[26:22] and and quite honestly, I'm I'm not I'm
not sure of of that. I mean I mean
[26:27] that's certainly at council's request,
we can ask for that moving forward.
[26:31] » think we would be asking specifically
for it, but just that it's been past
[26:34] practice that um
>> It's been stated, but never
[26:38] » applied.
>> Or or asked to be proven. I mean, yeah.
[26:41] Yeah.
>> Thank you.
[26:42] » it's an opportunity for the town to
support the Bass Classic without putting
[26:47] out taxpayers' money, right?
>> Absolutely.
[26:49] » By just not collecting those. Cuz if
they weren't using those
[26:53] porta potties, they'd be sitting in the
public works garage. So, it's no real
[26:57] loss of revenue.
It's just
[27:01] » But, the caveat
>> It's the kind work, yeah.
[27:02] » Yeah, the the foregone revenue, not so
much. Um, there there is absolutely a
[27:06] cost of of the work that we provide,
right? That that's not free. But, you're
[27:10] right. I mean, whether the the porta
potties, if they were just sitting in in
[27:13] the public works yard, you know, it'd be
foregone revenue in that sense. But, um,
[27:17] the other stuff is there's obviously a
cost in that.
[27:20] » Yeah.
Councillor Martin.
[27:22] » Yeah.
>> Last word.
[27:23] » [clears throat]
>> Me three on the on the no cost. Uh,
[27:27] the um, I I do have a question. Do they
have to provide proof of insurance for
[27:32] this event?
>> Oh, absolutely. Yes. So, they have they
[27:35] have to get a
a permit for the the erection of the
[27:38] tent. Uh, and then I believe that they
provide all that through that process.
[27:42] » Okay. Cool. Thanks.
>> Okay.
[27:44] » Great cause.
>> We'll go ahead with the current level of
[27:47] support?
>> Perfect. Thank you.
[27:50] Mike, do you want to grab those guys?
I'll just kidding.
[27:53] » [laughter]
[28:24] » I So, just an update. We had you had
seen the the memo was in the in the
[28:28] agenda package. Uh, council has agreed
to move forward with a level of service
[28:31] provided in 2025 and to waive any fees
pertaining to the rental of porta
[28:37] potties.
[28:40] » Okay. Since we have no in camera topics,
we will adjourn the meeting. Five-minute
[28:45] break.
We'll adjourn the meeting at 4:56 and
[28:50] we'll resume at 5:02.