[0:16] - Bonsoir et bienvenue à la
[0:18] séance du conseil municipal du
[0:21] mardi 23 mai.
[0:24] >> Good evening and welcome to
[0:27] the regular meeting of the
[0:28] municipal council on Tuesday,
[0:30] May 23rd. And now the city clerk
[0:35] will take on the adoption of the
[0:37] agenda. BEACONSFIELD SÉANCE
[0:42] ORDINAIRE DU CONSEIL MUNICIPAL
[0:50] - En faveur.
[0:55] - À l'unanimité.
[0:59] - Alors, avant d'inviter le
[1:02] commandant, nous avons une
[1:05] présentation ce soir à faire, un
[1:10] résident qui a passé plusieurs
[1:12] années sur le comité consultatif
[1:15] d'urbanisme, qui a donné
[1:16] beaucoup, beaucoup de lui-même à
[1:19] ce comité. Maintenant, il veut
[1:24] passer à autre chose. Mais on
[1:27] voudrait le reconnaître ce soir,
[1:29] reconnaître sa contribution au
[1:35] comité d'urbanisme. Et je veux
[1:38] demander à monsieur de rajouter
[1:39] quelque chose.
[1:41] >> In fact, tonight is a special
[1:43] night for all of, us I think,
[1:45] and for Serge who joined us this
[1:46] evening. As George just
[1:48] mentioned, he was on our
[1:50] planning advisory committee for
[1:51] 12 years, actually. Quite a
[1:54] dedicated 12 years, I might add.
[1:58] Surge, the years I've been here,
[1:59] he's been here as, well we've
[2:01] interacted many times on a
[2:02] monthly basis on various
[2:05] projects on the PC. Sege Sege so
[2:07] it is our, we are delighted to
[2:10] see again surge and to wish you
[2:13] well and I know you are stepping
[2:14] down. With other projects in the
[2:19] works these days. We didn't want
[2:21] that to go by unrecognized at
[2:22] the same time. But beyond that,
[2:27] I think you've been a great
[2:28] example, I think, of community
[2:31] engagement and resident
[2:33] engagement and some of the
[2:34] things we do as part of this
[2:35] committee. I think we also
[2:38] appreciate your dedicated years
[2:41] of volunteer-ism that you've
[2:42] given to that. You've helped
[2:44] along other members and
[2:46] everybody here to help build our
[2:48] city over the last 12 years. We
[2:49] think about it in that
[2:51] perspective. I also think you
[2:54] better our city in a lot of
[2:55] ways. For all of those things
[2:56] and many other, things we want
[2:57] to thank you for all your
[2:58] contributions and you are here
[2:59] tonight, for those on the
[3:01] webcast, we wanted to extend our
[3:04] thanks to yourself and have
[3:06] everybody be aware of that at
[3:07] the same time. So, with that in
[3:09] mind, we have a little something
[3:10] to present to you, Serge.
[3:16] - Je vais demeurer, demander à
[3:18] monsieur de se joindre à nous.
[3:22] (applaudissements)
[3:52] - On va commencer par faire une
[3:54] revue d'urbanisme.
[4:31] - Merci beaucoup, merci, très
[4:32] apprécié.
[4:50] >> It's not over.
[4:51] >> Thanks, guys.
[4:59] - Et maintenant, je vais
[5:01] demander aux commandants Sauvé
[5:03] de venir dire quelques mots sur
[5:05] les activités qui se passe à
[5:07] Beaconsfield. Merci.
[5:11] - Merci, Monsieur le Maire.
[5:14] Membre du conseil, citoyen,
[5:16] citoyenne, il n'y en a pas,
[5:18] peut-être en mode écoute. Je
[5:21] vais vous présenter un petit
[5:25] bilan divisé en section,
[5:27] sécurité routière, patrouille à
[5:30] vélo et activités
[5:31] communautaires. Donc, sans plus
[5:35] tarder, pour la sécurité
[5:37] routière, nous avons maintenu
[5:39] une présence soutenue auprès de
[5:42] l'école Saint-Rémy au début et à
[5:43] la fin des classes concernant
[5:46] les automobilistes qui ne
[5:47] respectent pas la signalisation
[5:48] aux abords de l'école. Plusieurs
[5:50] constats d'infraction ont été
[5:51] émis. À l'école de Beaconsfield,
[5:54] même chose, le non-respect de la
[5:57] signalisation, beaucoup de
[5:58] patrouilles en mode visibilité
[6:00] et respect de la signalisation
[6:01] aux abords de l'école. L'école
[6:05] Sherbrooke Académie junior,
[6:07] plusieurs patrouiller encore en
[6:08] mode visibilité pour faire
[6:09] respecter la signalisation aux
[6:12] abords de l'école. Nous avons
[6:15] également participé à l'ONG
[6:18] qui... des opérations nationales
[6:20] concerter le 28 avril au 4 mai,
[6:23] partage de la route. Donc,
[6:29] beaucoup de constats
[6:30] d'infraction émis à la ville de
[6:32] Beaconsfield en lien avec cette
[6:33] opération. Nous avons aussi
[6:36] procédé à une grosse opération
[6:37] de vitesse au coin de
[6:39] Saint-Charles, qui est une zone
[6:42] accidentogène dans notre
[6:44] secteur, 505, une zone
[6:48] résidentielle de 40 kilomètres
[6:50] heure. Saint-Charles et
[6:52] déconnait ainsi que Beaconsfield
[6:54] et Shore, 30 kilomètres heure,
[6:57] la zone. Toutes ces opérations,
[7:00] beaucoup de constats
[7:01] d'infraction ont été émis. Comme
[7:02] vous le savez, la dernière fois,
[7:04] je vous ai parlé de la
[7:05] patrouille à vélo qui sillonnent
[7:06] et rue de Beaconsfield. Nous
[7:09] avons deux patrouilleurs à vélo
[7:10] cette année. Durant tout le
[7:11] mois, du 24 avril au 23 mai,
[7:15] nous avons procédé à une
[7:16] patrouille du parc Angel ou d',
[7:19] à l'intention des usagers du
[7:20] parc. Beaucoup d'avis formelles
[7:21] ont été émis. Pour les chiens
[7:25] sont Ales. D'autres opérations
[7:29] sont planifiés, des opérations
[7:31] répressives sont planifiés au
[7:33] cours des mois de mai et juin.
[7:38] Le 28 avril, à l'école JFK, il y
[7:40] a eu une marche pour l'autisme
[7:42] avec les étudiants et le
[7:43] personnel de l'école,
[7:45] sécurisation et encadrements de
[7:46] la marche avec les patrouilleurs
[7:47] à vélo. Une belle participation
[7:48] lors de l'événement. Ensuite, le
[7:53] 24 avril, il y avait à
[8:01] Beaconsfield le défi des braves,
[8:03] patrouille des divers points,
[8:04] activités, lors du rallye, une
[8:08] belle participation encore une
[8:09] fois des patrouilleurs à vélo.
[8:12] Je vais vous en parler tantôt
[8:14] avec notre activité
[8:15] communautaire, mais il y a le
[8:17] grand
[8:18] (inaudible)
[8:19] . D'ailleurs, monsieur Bourelle,
[8:20] on s'est vu lors des événements.
[8:23] Pour les agents sociaux
[8:25] communautaires, le 25 avril, on
[8:30] a fait une co-, une formation,
[8:35] une formation policier
[8:36] intervenant, direction et
[8:38] direction adjointe des écoles.
[8:39] Ils ont tous reçu une formation
[8:44] avec la Division de prévention
[8:46] et sécurité urbaine. C'est une
[8:49] section au SPVM communautaire,
[8:51] corbeau. Et les enquêtes du
[8:54] SPVM. Le 25 avril, on a aux 200
[9:01] de Woodside, au United Church,
[9:04] on a fait une visite de
[9:07] courtoisie et plusieurs ses
[9:08] conseils de sécurité donnés aux
[9:11] divers organismes dans l'Église.
[9:13] Recommandations faites au...
[9:16] recommandations de sécurité
[9:17] faites aux propriétaires pour
[9:18] optimiser les mesures de
[9:19] sécurité en place. Le 28 avril,
[9:23] même chose. Au 202 Woodside,
[9:26] nous avons qu'on continue avec
[9:28] plusieurs rencontres et des
[9:29] organismes. On a aussi rencontré
[9:30] les gestionnaires de l'Église.
[9:36] L'école JFK, le 28 avril, marche
[9:39] extérieures étudiante, avec le
[9:41] personnel scolaire, la marche a
[9:42] été faite avec la patrouille à
[9:44] vélo. Aucun incident signalé.
[9:46] Le... le 3 mai, au centre
[9:52] civique, une rencontre de
[9:56] concertation avec plusieurs
[9:57] partenaires locaux, dont
[10:00] plusieurs partenaires qui
[10:02] couvrent Beaconsfield. Les
[10:03] agents sociaux communautaires
[10:04] ont participé à la rencontre. Le
[10:06] 4 mai, rencontre de mise au
[10:08] point avec le gestionnaire du
[10:10] centre de pachas à Beaconsfield.
[10:13] Rencontre d'optimisation des
[10:14] bonnes pratiques pour augmenter
[10:15] la sécurité des unités au
[10:19] centre. Et le 9 mai, le centre
[10:22] d'actions bénévoles de l'ouest
[10:23] de l'île rencontre encore une
[10:26] fois avec les deux agents
[10:28] sociaux communautaires, une
[10:29] rencontre pour améliorer les
[10:30] bonnes pratiques. Et le oui cas
[10:32] aussi, le 11 mai,
[10:37] (intervention en anglais)
[10:38] , on est aussi le 15 mai, le
[10:40] CLSC du Lac-Saint-Louis qui
[10:42] couvre le secteur de
[10:45] Beaconsfield. Tout ça, juste
[10:47] pour vous préciser qu'on reprend
[10:49] le rôle de nos partenaires très
[10:51] au sérieux. Donc, tout le monde
[10:52] a été rencontré. Et finalement,
[10:55] pour finir, le 10 mai, 46
[10:58] boulevard Saint-Charles, nous
[10:59] avons participé au gros marathon
[11:03] avec monsieur le maire. Pour la
[11:05] criminalité, il n'y a aucun
[11:07] événement majeur ou accidents
[11:08] majeurs dans la ville de
[11:10] Beaconsfield dans le dernier
[11:12] mois. Donc, encore une fois, je
[11:14] vous remercie de votre
[11:15] confiance. Vous pouvez en tout
[11:17] temps composé notre numéro pour
[11:21] rejoindre le poste de quartier
[11:22] ou bien envoyer un courriel à
[11:25] notre adresse, c'est une voiture
[11:29] qui est conçue à chaque jour.
[11:34] >> Thank you for your
[11:36] confidence, you may call 28001
[11:38] if you want to speak to a police
[11:39] officer at anytime or you can
[11:42] reach us by email at P D Q one
[11:46] at SPVM dot Q C.ca. Thank you
[11:48] very much.
[11:52] - Est-ce qu' il y a des
[11:53] questions pour le commandant?
[11:55] Any questions for the
[11:56] commandment? Go to the mic,
[11:59] please.
[12:08] - La chose qu'on doit se
[12:10] demander, c'est sur les relevés
[12:12] d'infraction près des écoles, ça
[12:15] doit... je parle à travers mon
[12:18] chapeau, probablement des
[12:19] parents qui viennent mener leurs
[12:21] enfants à l'école. Ma demande
[12:25] serait: qu'est-ce que ça, ça
[12:26] pourrait faire partie du contact
[12:31] interne de publicité,
[12:32] d'annonces, parce que toutes les
[12:34] familles reçoivent la revue
[12:36] contact, et de mettre l'emphase
[12:38] au point de vue santé et
[12:41] sécurité que les zones de parcs,
[12:43] les zones d'école, que même si
[12:45] on est résident, même si on
[12:48] amène nos enfants à l'école, que
[12:51] c'est une zone de sécurité pour
[12:52] tout le monde. Je pense qu'en
[12:57] distribuant... lorsque vous
[12:58] distribuer le contact, que cette
[13:00] revue va dans toutes les
[13:02] familles, que les gens aient en
[13:04] première page, s'il le faut, des
[13:06] grosses photos disant que c'est
[13:08] très important pour tout le
[13:10] monde. Moi, c'est une
[13:11] suggestion.
[13:14] - Votre suggestion est
[13:16] excellente. On va certainement
[13:18] la prendre en considération dans
[13:20] le prochain contact. Je vous
[13:22] demanderais, au commandant, de
[13:24] vous répondre sur les parents
[13:27] qui font des excès de vitesse et
[13:30] qui se plaignent souvent de la
[13:33] vitesse.
[13:34] - Oui, malheureusement, en
[13:35] effet, ça arrive, les parents
[13:38] qui sont précieux le matin. Et
[13:40] ce n'est pas tous les parents
[13:42] qui respecte la signalisation
[13:43] aux abords des écoles. Mais
[13:45] juste avant qu'on fasse une
[13:47] opération de répression, je
[13:48] voulais juste amener le point,
[13:50] votre question est très bonne,
[13:52] mais il y a une approche aussi
[13:54] de prévention qui est faite avec
[13:56] les parents, à l'école, par les
[13:58] agents sociaux comme, à mon
[14:00] poste de quartier. Donc ça,...
[14:01] oui. Je ne connais pas encore la
[14:06] réalité du secteur, mais c'est
[14:07] un peu pareil dans chaque
[14:08] secteur. C'est toujours des
[14:13] plantes qui reviennent. Donc,
[14:15] l'approche, elle est continuelle
[14:17] auprès de la direction de
[14:18] l'école, de la direction de
[14:20] l'école qui avise les parents.
[14:22] - Merci beaucoup. Une autre
[14:23] question? Any other questions or
[14:25] any comments? Alors, merci
[14:28] beaucoup, Monsieur le
[14:29] commandant. Ça fait plaisir de
[14:32] vous voir à chaque séance du
[14:33] conseil. Merci. Now we will
[14:39] proceed with the written
[14:41] questions we have received. Then
[14:43] we will go to the floor. The
[14:46] first question is from Nicole on
[14:51] Crescent. She asked two
[14:53] questions. Question one is on
[15:00] 40.1 item. I noticed this item
[15:03] mentions pesticide laws. Does
[15:04] Beaconsfield use pesticides in
[15:05] sewer? Does Beaconsfield use --
[15:11] in or near the sewers? I hope
[15:15] not. Because the bait kills fish
[15:16] and many other animals. Please
[15:18] do not use rodent aside. Here is
[15:24] an article about how dangerous
[15:26] it is to aquatic environment.
[15:29] She is giving us an article.
[15:34] Please do not ever use it in or
[15:37] near sewers, the bait goes up
[15:39] the food chain and will end up
[15:41] in the rivers and in fish.
[15:44] Rodenticide cannot effectively
[15:46] be filtered out of the water.
[15:52] You have already asked this
[15:53] question before. This question
[15:56] has already been answered by the
[16:00] administration and the answer
[16:01] is, no, the city does not use
[16:05] rodenticide in or near the
[16:06] sewer. Question two, the new
[16:10] definition of building includes
[16:13] vacant lots. What will
[16:14] Beaconsfield do to ensure that
[16:16] the lots are being built on or
[16:19] in fact vacant and do not
[16:22] contain mature trees or wetland?
[16:26] Beaconsfield define vacant lots
[16:28] as a non environmental-y
[16:30] sensitive space with no mature
[16:32] trees? In this bylaw, which is
[16:37] item 40.2, the term vacant is
[16:41] used in the sense of a
[16:43] construction and not of the
[16:44] environment. Environmental
[16:48] protections are provided for the
[16:51] environment quality act, for
[16:54] example protection of wetlands.
[16:55] And other Beaconsfield bylaws,
[16:59] as an example, zoning for trees,
[17:01] it is not the intended purpose
[17:02] for this bylaw section to take
[17:05] such environmental elements into
[17:06] account. The next question it
[17:14] came from octane Via.
[17:18] - Bonjour, c'est sur l'item 45.
[17:24] 2. Le comité consultatif
[17:27] d'urbanisme a donné un avis
[17:28] défavorable à notre demande.
[17:30] Cependant, les motifs ne nous
[17:31] ont pas été expliquées. Ceci
[17:33] dans le contexte où, avec des
[17:35] preuves à la pluie sur les
[17:37] particularités du terrain avec
[17:39] fossé, entre les deux lots,
[17:41] voisins, et les mesures mises en
[17:43] place, soit barrières de
[17:45] caoutchouc plus pente pouvant
[17:48] être mesuré, les impacts sur une
[17:50] telle dérogation serait nul
[17:52] alors que les coûts pour
[17:53] effectuer la correction serait
[17:55] important. Sans considérer
[17:58] l'effet esthétique. Nous
[18:00] aimerions avoir les explications
[18:02] référant et échanger pour qu'une
[18:06] analyse raisonnable soit faite
[18:07] en vue de la prise de décision
[18:08] par le Conseil. Merci d'avance.
[18:15] Alors, le CCU a indiqué que la
[18:19] condition indiquée au règlement
[18:28] BEAC- 0 44, sur les dérivation
[18:30] mineurs, n'est pas rempli.
[18:34] L'application des dispositions
[18:35] du règlement de zonage ne
[18:37] causent pas un préjudice sérieux
[18:39] au demandeur. Nous vous invitons
[18:41] à contacter le Service de
[18:44] l'urbanisme qui pourra vous
[18:46] donner un complément
[18:48] d'information, si vous voulez
[18:49] bien les contacter. Et
[18:53] maintenant, nous allons à la
[18:55] période de questions du public.
[18:57] Public questions. Yeah, sure.
[19:10] >> My name is Peter Samson. I've
[19:14] been a resident and a taxpayer
[19:15] here for 39 years. Some of you
[19:18] already know me. I don't need to
[19:22] provide you with an address. I
[19:26] have a slightly unorthodox
[19:27] question to ask. If you bear
[19:30] with me, you will understand
[19:33] where I'm coming from. The do
[19:37] it, I have to start off in a
[19:39] strange way. I will ask the
[19:43] question and then I will go with
[19:44] the preamble, to bring you up to
[19:49] date on how this is come to
[19:50] light. About -- last year, as a
[19:57] matter of fact, I became a
[20:02] little bit concerned about the
[20:03] noise levels being generated by
[20:06] the Generac generators,
[20:11] emergency generators. And with
[20:15] good reason, I am flanked by two
[20:17] of these machines on my
[20:19] property. After six or eight
[20:24] hours of a planned outage, I
[20:33] wasn't happy with the situation.
[20:34] I looked for guidance. Just to
[20:38] go back, as I slipped up on the
[20:40] question, the question is, would
[20:45] it be possible to trade you,
[20:48] this council, up even or even
[20:54] sweeten the deal with the town
[20:55] of Blaine Ville? That's the
[20:59] question. It's an orthodox. But
[21:01] as I said, this goes back to
[21:04] last year and when I became
[21:10] concerned about the noise level,
[21:13] I contacted, discreetly, via
[21:16] email, both the Mayor and my
[21:20] councillor and began a little
[21:22] bit of discussion via email on
[21:24] what was going on. The fact that
[21:27] I couldn't find anything in the
[21:30] regulations within the city of
[21:34] Beaconsfield that addressed in
[21:35] this situation. There were
[21:38] absolutely no parameters. It was
[21:39] wide open. So, eventually, we
[21:45] ended up with my councillor and
[21:47] I having an in-person meeting
[21:49] because the emails or not really
[21:50] working very well. It wasn't
[21:54] really coming to a proper
[21:55] conclusion. About time, my
[22:02] councillor had been in touch
[22:03] with many of you. The feedback
[22:08] he had received from you was
[22:10] that this was really not a
[22:11] problem. You couldn't see it as
[22:15] being a problem. Every time
[22:19] there was a reason given for not
[22:20] doing anything, basically that
[22:25] reason came at the same calibre
[22:27] as my dog ate my homework. It
[22:30] was at that level. The final
[22:35] part of the discussion, the
[22:37] in-person discussion over my
[22:38] kitchen table, was, well, we
[22:42] don't want to do anything, we
[22:44] don't think it's a problem. Have
[22:45] you tried talking to this
[22:46] individual? In this day and age,
[22:52] where if you open a wrong card
[22:54] or you can get shot, I would
[22:59] have to go to my neighbour when
[23:03] they are not breaking the law,
[23:06] because there is the law, and go
[23:08] on their property, ring their
[23:14] doorbell, and no matter how
[23:16] nicely I would say, it I am
[23:17] telling them, I really don't
[23:18] like what you are doing. Okay?
[23:23] What could go wrong under those
[23:24] circumstances? The City supposed
[23:28] to be practically -- protecting
[23:30] me and my interest is telling
[23:31] me, go out there for yourself.
[23:34] Okay. That's what the Council
[23:38] had said to me through my
[23:41] councillor. Okay. I had to live
[23:44] with that. Now, fast forward to
[23:50] the beginning of April. A
[23:56] situation affected all of us. In
[24:00] my particular case, and I
[24:01] believe in the case of my
[24:02] councillor as well, we were out
[24:07] for 120 consecutive hours. So,
[24:12] at that particular point in
[24:13] time, we had the two Generac
[24:16] systems that started up, doing
[24:18] their wonderful duet. Followed
[24:22] by a third portable that is
[24:24] really noisy. And shortly
[24:30] thereafter, a fourth came. I had
[24:37] these generators, the noise
[24:38] being generated by them in a
[24:41] 270-degree radius from my house
[24:44] for the better part of 120
[24:47] consecutive hours. Does this
[24:52] sound like it's not a problem?
[24:57] You could have fooled me. When I
[24:59] was looking out of my kitchen
[25:03] window, looking at that
[25:04] neighbour, who had their house
[25:07] lit up like a television studio,
[25:12] I bore no malice towards them.
[25:13] Why? Because they were doing
[25:18] everything that was within the
[25:19] law.
[25:21] >> Will you be coming to a
[25:23] conclusion?
[25:24] >> Yeah. We come to the
[25:25] conclusion. The conclusion is
[25:27] that this Council has done
[25:29] nothing with regard to that.
[25:32] Yet, there is a Council that has
[25:33] done something. That Council is
[25:41] Blainville. They have
[25:46] regulations, 53, just covering
[25:51] nuisance noise. And they have a
[25:55] curfew! It says, even, even
[26:01] under emergency situations that
[26:05] the noise level, those machines
[26:06] have to be turned off from 9:00
[26:09] at night until 7:00 in the
[26:10] morning. What do we have in
[26:13] Beaconsfield? Zip. Okay? And
[26:18] then in a separate regulation,
[26:19] they also have something that
[26:23] governs the level of noise is
[26:26] acceptable for the machines.
[26:29] It's 55 decibels.
[26:34] >> Besides Blainville, are there
[26:35] any other cities that you know?
[26:37] >> No, I have not researched the
[26:38] entire world. This I became
[26:40] aware of and these are bylaws.
[26:42] They enforce them because I know
[26:45] that, in fact, in at least one
[26:47] case, I was told about that the
[26:49] police were at the door when
[26:52] people were going over the
[26:53] curfew.
[26:56] >> Okay. I'm going to ask Mr.
[27:00] below to give you more
[27:01] information about this.
[27:03] >> Thank you for the
[27:04] information. I understand it
[27:07] could be annoying to have so
[27:09] long hours of machines. I went
[27:12] through that near my property.
[27:16] Overnight, it is not nearly
[27:17] interesting, I find. These
[27:21] aren't exceptional
[27:22] circumstances. Last time was 25
[27:23] years ago. We can have the
[27:27] Blainville bylaw says it is that
[27:28] information. Thanks for letting
[27:29] us know.
[27:34] >> The thing I find so
[27:36] irritating is the fact that I
[27:38] raised this issue last year and
[27:41] if you were watching the TV, TV
[27:43] news, channel 12, okay, from
[27:47] five until seven every night,
[27:49] there are Generac commercials
[27:51] after Generac commercial after
[27:53] Generac commercial. This is not
[27:54] something that is going away.
[27:57] >> For the sake of transparency,
[27:58] I have a Generac.
[28:02] >> That's fine.
[28:03] >> Thank you very much. Yes,
[28:06] next.
[28:18] >> Hi, Frank. Item 40.9, I
[28:23] believe it is my property. I was
[28:28] just sitting there. I looked up.
[28:33] He mentioned nuisance. I said,
[28:37] well, let's look at the
[28:38] definition of nuisance. First of
[28:41] all, it's illegal. It's
[28:44] obnoxious. It's dangerous, okay?
[28:49] There is danger. Why are we
[28:51] using this word? Nuisance.
[28:58] >> What is your question? I'm
[29:02] not sure where you are going
[29:04] with this.
[29:05] >> It's the same in French as an
[29:06] English in your documents.
[29:07] Nuisance.
[29:10] >> Nuisance?
[29:11] >> There is no French word for
[29:12] it.
[29:13] >> What is your question with a
[29:14] nuisance?
[29:15] >> No, no.
[29:16] >> Have you experienced a
[29:17] nuisance?
[29:19] >> I opened that. I want to
[29:21] thank you. I sent you an email.
[29:22] I assume you looked at it. I
[29:27] have a way to solve the problem
[29:30] we have, I have. I hope when you
[29:34] come to that point, you consider
[29:38] that I've been here 50 years.
[29:40] >> What is the problem?
[29:42] >> The problem is what is a
[29:43] nuisance? Am I illegal? Am I
[29:46] obnoxious? I'm not any of that.
[29:52] >> Are you talking about
[29:55] measures that the City has
[29:57] taken?
[29:58] >> No, I'm talking about the
[29:59] words you use.
[30:01] >> Okay. I'm going to ask Mr.
[30:04] bottle to answer your question.
[30:06] I think he has a lot of
[30:07] information to give you.
[30:09] >> What? Yes.
[30:13] >> Generally speaking, the word
[30:15] nuisance is used when it could
[30:18] be dangerous, might be annoying
[30:19] for others. I believe you are
[30:23] having traction. Occasionally,
[30:28] with the fire department and
[30:30] other governmental agencies as
[30:31] well. I know there is a
[30:34] situation here that is being
[30:36] looked at and soon we will be
[30:39] able to fix it in the best, in
[30:42] your best interest at first and
[30:44] for you as well.
[30:45] >> I'm trying to do my best.
[30:49] I've obviously sent you a
[30:51] picture of what I plan to do and
[30:54] I don't see why I'm violating
[30:56] anything. I'm doing my best.
[30:59] >> I see that picture that you
[31:01] have sent.
[31:02] >> I sent it to the Mayor.
[31:05] >> I didn't see it. We have our
[31:07] bylaws. It's applying the bylaws
[31:12] as per our rules and sometimes
[31:15] the bylaws don't please one
[31:17] neighbour or many neighbours.
[31:19] Those are the bylaws. In order
[31:20] to allow you exceptions, we have
[31:21] to change our bylaws.
[31:25] >> I'm not asking for that, sir.
[31:26] All I'm asking is, nobody has
[31:29] ever complained to me. I know
[31:31] they maybe complain to you guys,
[31:32] but they haven't complained to
[31:33] me. I listen.
[31:37] >> As you heard, the previous
[31:40] resident the microphone
[31:42] complained that the neighbour
[31:43] was not appealing -- complained
[31:44] to the city about neighbours,
[31:47] not be the first time that
[31:49] someone complains to the city
[31:51] without notifying their
[31:52] neighbour.
[31:55] >> Anyway. I hope you do
[31:58] something, as a 50-year citizen
[32:01] of the city, I can salvage what
[32:04] I did wrong. Thank you.
[32:06] >> Thank you. Another question?
[32:25] - Bonjour, Mesdames et
[32:26] Messieurs. The city signed an
[32:35] agreement with and why our sea
[32:39] in November 2019 where item 14,
[32:44] -- La Ville sont gages à démolir
[32:45] assez frais le hangar à la date
[32:49] du cinquième anniversaire de la
[32:50] signature de l'entente. La Ville
[32:51] s'engage à construire à frais
[32:55] une nouvelle capitaine ris avant
[32:57] la démolition du club House et
[33:01] va soumettre les plans de la
[33:03] nouvelle capitaine rit. Since
[33:07] it, we are now three and a half
[33:09] years down the road, the
[33:10] deadline is five years. Since we
[33:15] can be expecting that this will
[33:18] require many millions to destroy
[33:19] and rebuild, my question is,
[33:23] what is the total budget as of
[33:26] today to demolish and rebuild
[33:27] these facilities?
[33:32] >> Again, I will ask Mr. Boileau
[33:34] to answer your question.
[33:42] >>
[33:43] - Nul n'est tenu à l'impossible.
[33:45] La pandémie a nui à nos
[33:46] activités. Nos relations sont
[33:53] excellentes, dans l'avancement.
[33:54] Est-ce que vous voulez que je
[33:56] vous répondre en anglais?
[33:59] - Tu peux répondre des deux
[34:00] bords.
[34:01] - Je suis un peu mélangé,
[34:02] désolé. Oui, une entente de 5
[34:04] ans. Cette année, dans le
[34:08] programme, il est prévu la
[34:09] démolition de la grange pour
[34:12] permettre de continuer à opérer.
[34:15] Probablement que ça va se faire
[34:17] vers la fin de cette année. Et
[34:19] puis, après ça, il y aura des
[34:21] projets pour considérer les
[34:26] plantations d'une capitainerie,
[34:29] également d'autres éléments sur
[34:30] le terrain, comme le club House
[34:32] et la piscine. Mais je ne pense
[34:35] pas qu'ils aimeraient ça qu'on
[34:38] démolisse le club-house
[34:40] maintenant, après 5 ans, si la
[34:41] capitainerie n'est pas là. Là
[34:44] capitainerie, ça permettrait de
[34:47] contrôler les entrées et les
[34:49] sorties. Probablement qu'un
[34:50] petit bureau de travail avec
[34:52] toilettes, utilitaire pour les
[34:55] usagers de ce secteur du parc.
[34:57] - Donc, je comprends de réponse.
[34:59] La première, c'est que le délai
[35:00] est reporté probablement.
[35:03] - Pas officiellement.
[35:04] - Ta formellement.
[35:05] - Pas officiellement, mais on a
[35:07] des raisons de croire que ça
[35:09] risque d'être retardé.
[35:10] - O.K.. Deuxièmement, quand vous
[35:12] faites le parallèle avec le
[35:14] parc, moi, j'entends... je ne
[35:19] parle pas de la construction,
[35:20] mais de la démolition.
[35:23] - Je pense que c'est plus
[35:25] 500000. Parce que ça a coûté
[35:28] 700000. On parle d'un chalet qui
[35:32] sert à des fins communautaires
[35:34] d'un district, d'un quartier, on
[35:37] parle de son utilité pour les
[35:39] usagers, évidemment. Est-ce que
[35:41] ça va être sain 100000 ou
[35:44] 750000? On y est pas encore.
[35:46] Mais on n'est pas dans un chalet
[35:48] de parc à grand déploiement.
[35:50] - Ça, est-ce qu'on va être
[35:52] informé, nous, d'une façon ou
[35:53] d'une autre, du fait que ça a
[35:55] coûté à la Ville autant où que
[35:57] ça va coûter à la ville autant?
[36:01] - Les informations sont publiées
[36:04] à chaque automne. Lorsque le
[36:08] Conseil adopte le plan.
[36:10] - Sauf qu'on ne voit pas les
[36:12] chiffres détaillés par projet.
[36:13] Ce qu'on, voit c'est le total.
[36:15] - Non, ça n'a pas à être rendue
[36:20] publique et on ne le fait pas
[36:21] pour des fins d'appel d'offres
[36:24] et éviter qu'il y ait des
[36:26] communications entre les
[36:27] soumissionnaires pour indiquer
[36:28] les prix. Ce n'est pas moi qui
[36:29] fais ces règles-là. Elles sont
[36:31] comme ça. Ça nous convient. Il
[36:34] est le prix total des projets.
[36:36] Et quand on fait un appel
[36:38] d'offres, vous connaissez le
[36:39] budget que la Ville a pris.
[36:41] C'est Davie publique au moment
[36:42] de l'appel d'offres. Il y a le
[36:44] budget qui est présenté au
[36:46] service électronique d'appel
[36:48] d'offres. Et ils ont trois
[36:51] semaines, dépendamment des
[36:52] projets, deux à quatre semaines
[36:54] pour soumettre un prix en
[36:57] fonction de ce qui était
[36:58] demandé.
[37:00] - Et le projet devrait être
[37:02] formellement adopté par le
[37:03] Conseil.
[37:04] - Oui, ensuite de ça, il y a les
[37:05] ouvertures. Il y a un dépôt au
[37:09] conseil, une approbation, un
[37:12] rejet, comme on le fait
[37:13] régulièrement, à chaque mois,
[37:14] absolument.
[37:17] - Aucune. Dernière question,
[37:18] c'est plus une remarque,
[37:19] peut-être. Monsieur le Maire.
[37:24] And you notice the water levels
[37:28] disappearing? I'm related to
[37:31] what happened two years ago the
[37:32] St. Lawrence River seaway,
[37:38] whatever group published the
[37:40] report and we commented. What
[37:43] they were saying is that, more
[37:47] and more, there will be problems
[37:48] with the water levels. What's
[37:51] happening? What has been
[37:52] happening in March, April it was
[37:56] the water flowing from the
[37:57] Ottawa River. Now, it is still
[38:02] high because now is the overflow
[38:03] from the Great Lakes. It is
[38:05] still okay. But still take no,
[38:10] keep track of those numbers when
[38:12] you answered to us two years
[38:13] ago, you said checking every
[38:16] month or whatever, I hope you
[38:18] are doing that every spring
[38:20] because the problem will grow,
[38:21] as you can see, around the --
[38:24] >> I check it every day, in
[38:25] fact. I know that Mr. Boileau
[38:31] and Mr. Shabbat --
[38:35] >> You agree a tie, don't you
[38:36] agree?
[38:37] >> Every year, it goes up. It
[38:41] goes up to slightly below what
[38:45] we consider minor, you know but
[38:53] the flow is controlled upstream.
[38:57] >> Up to a certain level, they
[38:58] said.
[38:59] >> The control upstream is not
[39:02] to flood the Lac-Saint-Louis.
[39:07] >> In the report, when they were
[39:09] saying, I can bring you back the
[39:11] report if you want, at one point
[39:13] they will have to make a choice
[39:17] between flood north or west that
[39:18] would be, let's say, the Great
[39:22] Lakes, or flooding the
[39:24] downstream here.
[39:25] >> Lake Ontario. There is an
[39:27] understanding now that
[39:30] Lac-Saint-Louis -- in 2019, the
[39:34] situation was worse.
[39:37] >> No, I agree.
[39:38] >> We still had no flooding.
[39:39] >> The report was about 2017 and
[39:40] 2019. They were saying, in the
[39:44] future, it will get worse and we
[39:46] have no control over the
[39:49] situation if it goes to high.
[39:50] >> We will get there when we get
[39:51] there.
[39:53] >> Well, that day it will be too
[39:54] late. Thank you.
[40:01] >> Other questions?
[40:07] - Bonjour. J'ai posé la
[40:09] troisième question. Si j'ai bien
[40:11] compris, la demande de
[40:13] dérogation a été boxé. Nous, on
[40:16] a souvent posé la question au
[40:18] département d'urbanisme pour
[40:20] savoir c'est quoi la raison,
[40:21] parce qu'on ne comprend pas du
[40:22] tout quelle est la raison. C'est
[40:24] pour ça que je suis là ce soir.
[40:25] Eux, ils m'ont dit de passer ici
[40:28] peut-être que je vais avoir des
[40:29] réponses. Donc, je pose la
[40:33] question. D'après nous, oui, on
[40:36] comprend qu'il y a un décret qui
[40:37] dit qu'on n'a pas le droit
[40:39] d'avoir des dalles de 2 mètres
[40:41] dans la cour voisine, mais tout
[40:43] ce qu'on a fait, c'était à la
[40:45] demande de notre contracteur. Il
[40:48] nous a mis devant le fait.
[40:51] Est-ce qu'on le fait comme ça ou
[40:52] est-ce qu'on ne le fait pas
[40:53] comme ça? On a dit que on
[40:55] pensait que c'était mieux. Mais
[40:57] il n'y a pas d'application à
[40:59] cause de l'eau de pluie. J'étais
[41:02] là, il m'a dit que c'était une
[41:05] demande de dérogation mineure et
[41:06] que ça allait passer, d'après
[41:08] lui. Nous, on a mis dédales,
[41:12] mais on ne savait pas si ça
[41:14] allait avoir un impact. L'impact
[41:17] dédale sur notre terrain, entre
[41:21] les deux mais ça, il y a
[41:23] vraiment un grand fossé, il n'y
[41:24] a personne qui nous répond. S'il
[41:28] y a un impact, je peux
[41:30] comprendre, si ça peut affecter
[41:32] notre voisin, si ça peut
[41:37] affecter, on comprend tout, on
[41:40] ne veut pas briser la loi. On ne
[41:41] savait pas. On s'était dit que
[41:46] c'était mieux comme, savent que
[41:47] c'était plus beau. C'est ça que
[41:48] je ne comprends pas. Ils nous
[41:50] ont recommandé de venir ici pour
[41:51] poser la question. Moi, je
[41:54] voudrais me défendre aussi. Ce
[41:56] n'est pas mal.
[42:00] - Je peux déjà vous donner une
[42:02] réponse ce soir. Vous aviez
[42:04] écrit votre question. Ma réponse
[42:05] tient toujours. Oui, ça va
[42:11] probablement être une chose que
[42:14] le conseil va adopter à la
[42:16] recommandation qui a été fait
[42:17] par le CCU. Mais je vous
[42:19] recommande fortement de
[42:20] retourner au CCU avec les
[42:24] arguments que vous avez et les
[42:26] informations que vous avez. Ça
[42:32] peut revenir au conseil avec les
[42:34] recommandations du CCU à ce
[42:36] moment-là, selon vous
[42:37] informations qui ont été donnés,
[42:38] avec eux. Alors, à ce moment-là,
[42:42] je présume que ça pourrait
[42:46] changer. Mais ce sont les
[42:48] experts, ce sont eux sur
[42:50] lesquelles on se fie pour
[42:52] prendre nos décisions. Alors, ma
[42:58] recommandation, comme je vous
[42:59] l'ai dit tout à l'heure,
[43:01] retourner au CCU après ce soir.
[43:03] - Donc, je dois reprendre avec
[43:05] eux?
[43:06] - Je pense qu'on va certainement
[43:10] donner les informations ce soir
[43:13] aussi. Retourner au CCU pour
[43:16] voir ce que vous pouvez apporter
[43:18] plus comme information, plus de
[43:20] détails, rencontrer les
[43:22] exigences. Et votre demande va
[43:27] revenir aux prochains mois. Et à
[43:29] ce moment-là, si les
[43:31] recommandations sont adoptées,
[43:36] votre dérogation, le Conseil
[43:38] agira en conséquence.
[43:39] - Oui. Merci beaucoup. Bonne
[43:40] soirée.
[43:45] - Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres
[43:46] questions? Any other questions?
[43:50] Alors, nous allons procéder avec
[43:53] l'agenda. Madame la greffière?
[43:58] >> Approval of the minutes of
[43:59] the Beaconsfield public
[44:01] consultation of April 24th, 2023
[44:03] at 7:30 P M.
[44:07] >> Second.
[44:08] >> All in favour?
[44:30] - À l'unanimité.
[44:35] >> Awarding of contract for the
[44:39] construction of a sidewalk on
[44:43] field fair, and Woodland, in the
[44:51] amount to
[44:57] $558,182.48 all taxes included.
[45:05] >> Proposed.
[45:34] Awarding of contract for the
[45:43] transportation of beaucoup
[45:44] leaves with two renewal options
[45:46] to the lowest confirming bitter
[45:52] GFL Environmental Inc., In the
[45:53] amount of $53, 462, all taxes
[45:57] included.
[45:59] >> In favour?
[46:21] Approbation de la liste des
[46:22] comptes à payer au 23 mai 2023,
[46:23] et de la liste des paiements
[46:24] préautorisés pour la période du
[46:25] 13 avril 2023 au 23 avril 2023
[46:26] et du 25 avril
[46:27] - Les 2023 au 10 mai 2023, pour
[46:28] un déboursé total de montants
[46:29] importants sous 3 076 676,21 $.
[46:30] 827800 dollars. Pour achat d'un
[46:34] camion et 340 858, 78,
[46:40] réfrigération pour le
[46:42] remplacement des contrôles hôtel
[46:44] de ville et Bibliothèque. 207
[46:51] diminue pour la construction de
[46:52] nouveaux chalets. Et finalement,
[46:57] les salaires Hackett sont 16000.
[47:03] - Proposé.
[47:11] >> The positive party treasurer
[47:13] financial statements as of
[47:14] December 31st, 2022. Lecture et
[47:18] dépôt des faits saillants du
[47:20] rapport financier pour l'année
[47:21] 2022 par le maire de la Ville de
[47:28] Beaconsfield.
[47:29] - Le rapport, je vais le lire.
[47:30] C'est un rapport du maire sur
[47:33] les faits saillants du rapport
[47:36] financier 2022. Et sur le
[47:37] rapport du vérificateur externe.
[47:40] Tel que l'exige l'article 105 de
[47:43] la Loi sur les cités et villes,
[47:45] je vous fais rapport des faits
[47:47] saillants du rapport financier
[47:49] 2022 de la ville de Beaconsfield
[47:51] et du rapport du vérificateur
[47:54] externe indépendant.
[47:59] >> Highlights of the financial
[48:00] statement as of -- 2022.
[48:03] Statements of the detailed
[48:05] results and the operating
[48:06] surplus are for tax purposes for
[48:09] the year ended December 31, 2022
[48:14] so operating revenues have --
[48:18] and fiscal charges and all
[48:20] located amounts totaling
[48:25] 52,000,839 $731. As such for the
[48:31] 2022 fiscal year, the total
[48:34] operating surplus from tax
[48:35] purposes which is a surplus for
[48:37] the fiscal year is 1 million
[48:41] $506,039. The portion of the
[48:45] surplus stems from revenues that
[48:46] were higher than expected.
[48:49] Notably property transfer taxes.
[48:52] Grants from different
[48:54] governments and interest income.
[48:55] The final portion it's
[49:04] attributed two savings in each
[49:05] of the departments in 2022. The
[49:14] an operating surplus was 1
[49:18] million $806,268. The allocated
[49:20] portion was 10,000,095 including
[49:29] 2,000,292 $528 for
[49:30] infrastructure. This also had an
[49:32] amount of 7,584,000 in reserve
[49:36] funds. Specifically and it's
[49:39] working. As of December 31 2022,
[49:45] the statement of financial
[49:47] position including a debt in the
[49:48] amount of 20 million $271,000
[49:52] grants from the government of
[49:53] Quebec would be used to
[49:57] reimburse 30.7% of this debt
[49:58] which is six point $2 million.
[50:03] Capital assets totally 7 million
[50:07] and including six point $2
[50:09] million of acquisitions made in
[50:12] 2022. Five point $2 million in
[50:16] infrastructure such as drinking
[50:19] water, wastewater, and $1
[50:21] million in building. Le 22 mars
[50:28] 2023, le Cabinet a signé le
[50:30] rapport du ministère
[50:31] indépendant. Après avoir
[50:33] effectué l'audit selon les
[50:34] normes d'audit généralement
[50:35] reconnues du Canada, l'opinion
[50:38] suivante a été émise: à mon
[50:41] avis, les états financiers
[50:43] donnent dans tous les aspects
[50:46] significatifs une image fidèle
[50:47] de la situation financière de la
[50:49] ville de Beaconsfield au 31
[50:52] décembre 2022. Ainsi que des
[50:55] résultats de longues activités,
[50:57] de variations de la dette nette
[50:58] et de leurs flux de trésorerie
[51:00] pour l'exercice terminé à cette
[51:01] date. Conformément aux normes
[51:04] comptables canadiennes, pour le
[51:06] secteur public.
[51:10] >> In conclusion, the 2022
[51:12] financial statement on the
[51:13] report from the independent will
[51:15] be tabled at this council
[51:17] meeting and be forwarded to --
[51:22] and the highlights will be
[51:24] published on the website of the
[51:26] city of Beaconsfield. I think
[51:28] the members of the municipal
[51:30] council and the managers for the
[51:31] work they do and their
[51:35] contribution to serve their
[51:37] citizens well and to achieve the
[51:38] goals of our organization.
[51:52] >> Filings of this bylaw, on
[51:57] permits and certificates to
[51:59] request a report signed by a
[52:01] professional within the meaning
[52:03] of section 31.42 of the quality
[52:07] act, one submitting an
[52:09] application for construction or
[52:11] subdivision permit, and to make
[52:12] connections to water storm and
[52:16] sanitary lines to obtain a
[52:17] certificate of authorization and
[52:18] submission of the draft by-law
[52:19] to a public consultation on June
[52:20] 19, 2023, at 7:30 PM.
[52:28] >> I give notice and I propose
[52:31] this as well.
[52:32] >> I second.
[52:35] >> In favour? Dépôt, avis de
[52:37] motion et adoption d'un projet
[52:41] de Règlement BEAC-046-6 intitulé
[52:42] « Règlement modifiant le
[52:46] Règlement de construction
[52:47] BEAC-046 afin de modifier les
[52:48] dispositions relatives aux
[52:50] appareils à combustion solide et
[52:54] d'exiger le raccordement des
[52:58] bâtiments principaux aux
[52:59] conduites principales d'aqueduc
[53:00] et d'égout pluvial et
[53:01] sanitaire » et soumission du
[53:02] projet de règlement à une
[53:03] consultation publique le 19 juin
[53:04] 2023 à 19 h 30.
[53:07] >> I second.
[53:10] >> All in favour?
[53:25] >> Adoption of bylaw entitled
[53:29] bylaw modifying bylaw --
[53:32] conserving permits and
[53:34] certificates in order to address
[53:37] certificates -- for the
[53:42] principal residence established
[53:45] usage relating to the principle
[53:47] establishment usage to modify
[53:49] the titles of the sections
[53:50] related to certificates of
[53:52] occupancy for a commercial usage
[53:54] in order to integrate the notion
[53:56] of the original usage of housing
[54:00] groups and the establishment
[54:01] usage from the lodging services
[54:07] C five, two require certificate
[54:10] of occupancy for commercial
[54:11] usage is and additional usage
[54:12] from the housing group if you
[54:17] citizen principal uses from the
[54:20] lodging services when. To define
[54:23] the procedures, and criteria for
[54:27] the validity and to provide the
[54:29] certificate of occupancy for
[54:31] principle resident
[54:32] establishment. The objective of
[54:36] this bylaw is clearly stated in
[54:38] the title and concerns lodging
[54:42] services, short term rentals and
[54:45] Beaconsfield.
[54:48] >> Proposed --
[54:51] >> Second.
[54:52] >> All in favour?
[54:58] Adoption, avec changements, du
[54:59] Règlement
[55:05] BEAC-045-16 intitulé «
[55:06] Règlement modifiant le Règlement
[55:07] BEAC-045 sur les permis et
[55:08] certificats afin d'abroger les
[55:09] dispositions relatives aux
[55:10] amendes pour la démolition, de
[55:12] référer au Règlement sur la
[55:13] démolition BEAC-152
[55:14] préalablement à l'obtention d'un
[55:15] permis de construction
[55:16] nécessitant la démolition d'un
[55:17] bâtiment, d'assujettir la
[55:18] démolition totale d'un bâtiment
[55:20] à l'obtention d'un certificat
[55:21] d'autorisation et d'abroger les
[55:23] dispositions relatives aux
[55:24] démolitions du présent
[55:29] règlement ». L'objet du
[55:30] règlement est clairement
[55:32] indiqué. La portée du règlement
[55:34] est sur l'ensemble du
[55:36] territoire. À noter que des
[55:37] changements ont été apportés
[55:39] suivant l'avis de motion et la
[55:40] consultation du public à
[55:41] l'article simple pour permettre
[55:42] de finaliser les dossiers
[55:44] présentement en cours avant
[55:45] d'entrer en vigueur et les
[55:46] nouvelles dispositions.
[55:48] - Je propose l'adoption.
[55:54] - Une seconde.
[55:55] - En faveur.
[55:56] - À l'unanimité.
[56:02] >> Adoption of -- on tariffs,
[56:08] the objective of this bylaw is
[56:09] to amend the tariffs to modify
[56:13] certain tariffs of the following
[56:14] sections. Certificate of
[56:17] authorization for demolition,
[56:18] the use of public and tariffs
[56:22] are also added in the leisure
[56:24] table, one and ten of appendix
[56:25] eight.
[56:40] L'objet du règlement et
[56:42] d'établir un nouveau cadre
[56:43] réglementaire pour les
[56:44] démolitions de bâtiments à
[56:45] Beaconsfield et sur l'ensemble
[56:46] du territoire de la ville.
[56:50] - Opposé.
[56:51] - En faveur.
[56:53] - À l'{city_council} unanimité.
[56:57] >> Adoption of the second draft
[57:01] bylaw entitled zoning bylaw 720
[57:05] to the class of use lodging
[57:08] services to modify provisions
[57:10] for housing. To prescribe
[57:15] specific provisions concerning
[57:17] principle resident
[57:18] establishments to modify
[57:20] provisions regarding science
[57:21] permitted without -- to modify
[57:26] and our definitions concerning
[57:28] logic services to the index to
[57:31] allow usage of the class of use
[57:36] the lodging services in -- in
[57:38] zones H119, C120, C208, H231,
[57:40] H235, C309, H315,
[57:45] H343 and H344, and to modify the
[57:49] limits of zone H231 in order to
[57:56] enlarge zone H115 within zone
[58:03] H231« . and the objective of
[58:04] this bylaw is clearly started
[58:05] not and its title. The
[58:12] residential zones as indicated
[58:13] in the bylaw, they may also be
[58:16] -- the zones may also be
[58:18] consulted by referring to the
[58:19] public notice stated April 14,
[58:21] 2023 on the City website.
[58:25] >> All in favour?
[58:30] Adoption du Règlement 720-128
[58:33] intitulé « Règlement modifiant
[58:35] le règlement de zonage 720 afin
[58:36] d'ajouter la définition de
[58:37] bâtiment accessoire, d'abroger
[58:38] le terme démolition et sa
[58:39] définition et de modifier les
[58:40] définitions de mur extérieur et
[58:41] de superficie d'emprise au
[58:48] sol ». Donc, encore une fois, le
[58:50] règlement est motivé et concerne
[58:53] les démolitions. Le règlement
[58:56] s'applique sur l'ensemble du
[58:57] territoire. Je propose.
[59:01] - En faveur.
[59:04] - À l'unanimité.
[59:09] >> Authorization to correct
[59:11] nuisance and to build a cost to
[59:13] the owner in virtue of the bylaw
[59:16] be zero 33.
[59:25] Adoption du Règlement Nous
[59:29] allons regrouper les points en
[59:31] 40. Dix à 40. 50. 720-127-1
[59:36] intitulé « Règlement modifiant
[59:37] le
[59:41] Règlement de zonage 720 afin
[59:42] d'ajouter un usage
[59:43] spécifiquement prohibé à la zone
[59:44] H101 », et tenue d'un registre
[59:45] le 6 juin. 40.10 Donc, chacun
[59:47] des autres points à ces zones
[59:50] spécifiques. Il y aura
[59:51] enregistre le 6 juin. Et les
[59:54] amendements de ces règlements
[59:56] sont pour ajouter un usage
[59:59] spécifiquement prohibé. Soit
[1:00:01] l'usage d'établissements de
[1:00:02] résidence principale. Et les
[1:00:05] zones spécifiés, les zones
[1:00:07] spécifiés sont spécifiés dans
[1:00:09] chacun des amendements. On peut
[1:00:11] également concerner, consultez
[1:00:13] la vie publique avec des cartes,
[1:00:14] qui se trouve sur le site Web de
[1:00:15] la ville.
[1:00:20] >> All in favour?
[1:00:34] Nous allons maintenant au point
[1:00:36] 45.
[1:00:37] >> Un. Request for minor
[1:00:39] exemption located at 20 to
[1:00:41] Glendale the recommendation is
[1:00:42] to approve.
[1:00:45] >> Proposed?
[1:00:46] >> Second.
[1:00:47] >> All in favour?
[1:01:08] Nous allons regrouper les points
[1:01:13] >> Request for 45. Minor
[1:01:14] exemptions for the property
[1:01:18] located at 132, -- and it is
[1:01:21] projected -- also the projected
[1:01:29] address and protected lot's as
[1:01:33] well as 142, 134, 136 large. It
[1:01:41] is -- the recommendation is to
[1:01:43] approve.
[1:01:45] >> Proposed.
[1:01:47] >> Second.
[1:01:48] >> All in favour?
[1:02:14] >> Request for the approval of
[1:02:16] the architecture integration
[1:02:17] program leading to a building
[1:02:19] permit application for a new
[1:02:20] main building located at 119
[1:02:25] Lakeview. They were submitted
[1:02:32] but however, the Council may
[1:02:36] choose to approve the permit. We
[1:02:43] can approve.
[1:02:47] >> Who is approving it? All in
[1:02:50] favour of the approval?
[1:02:56] >> The plan dated May 9th, 2023.
[1:03:31] >> On the projected lot the
[1:03:34] recommendation is to refuse?
[1:03:37] >> All in favour?
[1:03:55] La recommandation est approuvée.
[1:03:58] - Proposé.
[1:03:59] - Je puis.
[1:04:00] - En faveur.
[1:04:03] - À l'unanimité.
[1:04:05] >> Request for the approval of
[1:04:07] the site planning an
[1:04:09] architectural duration program
[1:04:10] relating to a building permit
[1:04:11] application for the building
[1:04:12] located at -- the recommendation
[1:04:14] is to refuse.
[1:04:17] >> Proposed.
[1:04:18] >> Second.
[1:04:19] >> All in favour?
[1:04:26] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[1:04:27] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:04:28] architecturale
[1:04:29] (PIIA)
[1:04:30] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:04:31] de construction pour un
[1:04:36] --
[1:04:42] >> Request for the approval of
[1:04:43] the site planning and
[1:04:46] integration program relating to
[1:04:47] a building application for the
[1:04:50] main building located at it --
[1:05:03] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[1:05:05] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:05:09] architecturale
[1:05:10] (PIIA)
[1:05:11] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:05:12] de construction pour la
[1:05:13] modification de la façade du
[1:05:14] bâtiment principal situé au 434,
[1:05:15] Concord. La recommandation est
[1:05:16] d'approuver ce plan. Le nouveau
[1:05:18] plan a été remis en date du 16
[1:05:19] mai. Pour une approbation.
[1:05:23] - Proposé.
[1:05:24] - Secondé.
[1:05:27] - Pour... on est d'accord sur le
[1:05:29] plan du 16 mai.
[1:05:34] - À l'unanimité. D'accord.
[1:05:40] Request for the approval of the
[1:05:42] site planning and architectural
[1:05:46] integration program to modify
[1:05:47] the already approved the program
[1:05:50] at 63 Madsen.
[1:05:54] >> All in favour?
[1:05:59] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[1:06:00] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:06:01] architecturale
[1:06:02] (PIIA)
[1:06:03] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:06:04] de construction pour la
[1:06:05] modification du plan déjà
[1:06:06] approuvé au 134, Madsen. La
[1:06:10] recommandation est d'approuver.
[1:06:11] - Proposé.
[1:06:12] - Ce qu'on est.
[1:06:13] - En faveur.
[1:06:14] - À l'unanimité.
[1:06:24] -- the recommendation is to
[1:06:27] refuse.
[1:06:29] >> Second.
[1:06:31] >> All in favour? Demande de
[1:06:37] certificat d'autorisation pour
[1:06:38] l'installation d'une enseigne
[1:06:39] pour le commerce situé au
[1:06:40] 445-447, Beaconsfield. La
[1:06:43] recommandation est de refuser.
[1:06:44] - Opposé.
[1:06:47] - Secondé.
[1:06:48] - En faveur.
[1:06:51] - À l'unanimité. Nous allons
[1:06:57] regrouper les points
[1:07:03] >> 45.19 et les suivantes. A
[1:07:04] request for the approval of site
[1:07:05] planning an architectural
[1:07:07] integration program for the
[1:07:08] subdivision of the property
[1:07:09] located at 132-134-136 Larch
[1:07:11] (projected lot 6 576 817)
[1:07:12] .
[1:07:21] 140 large for the projected lot
[1:07:24] and the property located at 142,
[1:07:28] 144, and 136 large. The
[1:07:32] projected lot, --
[1:07:39] >> Proposed.
[1:07:40] >> Second.
[1:07:41] >> All in favour?
[1:08:08] - Proposé.
[1:08:09] - J'appuie.
[1:08:10] - En faveur.
[1:08:12] - Donc, à l'unanimité.
[1:08:16] Acceptance of an amount of
[1:08:20] $27,824.40. To be paid by the
[1:08:22] owner of the lot 242 and 109
[1:08:28] Jasper to the bylaw concerning
[1:08:31] the establishment of parks,
[1:08:36] playgrounds, and natural areas
[1:08:37] on Beaconsfield's territory.
[1:08:40] >> In favour?
[1:09:04] Proposed?
[1:09:18] >>?
[1:09:21] - À l'unanimité.
[1:09:23] >> Minutes of the Planning
[1:09:25] Advisory Committee meeting of
[1:09:26] May 23rd, 2023.
[1:09:28] >> Any comments, Mister
[1:09:30] - Non, je n'ai Chairman? Aucun
[1:09:32] commentaire that was in there
[1:09:33] additionnel.
[1:09:39] >>
[1:09:40] >>
[1:09:41] >> I second.
[1:09:42] >> All in favour?
[1:09:46] >> Any comments, Mister
[1:09:48] Chairman?
[1:09:49] >> No
[1:09:51] - Non, nous n'avons pas de
[1:09:53] Recommandations comme tel. Je
[1:09:54] propose.
[1:09:57] - On Pfizer. En faveur.
[1:10:01] - À l'unanimité.
[1:10:04] >> Request the Government of
[1:10:05] Quebec to implement solutions
[1:10:07] for making the Quebec
[1:10:10] destination red network more
[1:10:11] reliable and robust.
[1:10:15] >> Proposed.
[1:10:16] >> All in favour? What I am also
[1:10:20] in favour.
[1:10:22] [Laughter]
[1:10:23] - À l'unanimité.
[1:10:35] >>
[1:10:36] - Je proposed?
[1:10:37] >> Propose.
[1:10:38] - Seconde.
[1:10:39] - Second.
[1:10:40] En faveur.
[1:10:41] - À l'unanimité.
[1:10:42] >> Tabling of the -- reservoir
[1:10:43] of the report, know the report
[1:10:46] regarding the ice storm of April
[1:10:47] 5th, 2023, and the prolonged
[1:10:51] power outage.
[1:10:52] >> Any comments, Mr. --?
[1:10:57] - Je vais fait ça dans mon
[1:10:58] rapport de directeur.
[1:10:59] >> It was a very busy period,
[1:11:02] those five days. Brought a lot
[1:11:04] of overtime and a lot of work,
[1:11:07] put a lot of stress on the
[1:11:09] public works for coming weeks,
[1:11:11] and a little difficulty to move
[1:11:14] on with our other projects as
[1:11:16] many of our employees have been
[1:11:18] working on the collection of
[1:11:20] branches all over the city for
[1:11:23] six or seven weeks now. This
[1:11:26] week should be back to almost
[1:11:30] normality. Next week the
[1:11:33] redshirt regular branch pickup
[1:11:35] schedule, and some branches have
[1:11:39] come out after we went by. But
[1:11:40] that is part of the game. We
[1:11:42] still see branches in the trees,
[1:11:44] here and there, when we drive
[1:11:46] around. It was an important
[1:11:52] emergency measure for us. I just
[1:11:53] want to highlight the work of my
[1:11:56] whole team and the public works
[1:11:58] team as well, communication
[1:12:00] team.
[1:12:02] >> Thank.
[1:12:03] - Merci beaucoup.
[1:12:19] - Proposé.
[1:12:20] - J'appuie.
[1:12:21] - En faveur.
[1:12:22] - À l'unanimité.
[1:12:23] >> Monday to the administration
[1:12:25] of the Beaconsfield to practice
[1:12:27] second payment of -- the
[1:12:28] invoices of contributions for
[1:12:29] the year 2023 to the -- of
[1:12:33] Montréal.
[1:12:34] >> I just want to underline,
[1:12:36] again, that this is being paid
[1:12:41] under protest.
[1:12:43] >> Proposed?
[1:12:44] >> Seconded.
[1:12:44] >> All in favour.
[1:13:01] - Proposé.
[1:13:05] - Secondé.
[1:13:06] - En faveur.
[1:13:08] - À l'unanimité. Vous votez
[1:13:15] contre. À l'unanimité, d'accord.
[1:13:18] - Je surveille toujours, pour
[1:13:19] être certain.
[1:13:20] - D'accord.
[1:13:23] >> Mayor's report on the
[1:13:25] decision to make -- immersion
[1:13:27] meeting of
[1:13:30] - 18 2023.
[1:13:31] Oui. Je n'ai pas beaucoup à dire
[1:13:34] là-dessus, mais j'aimerais tout
[1:13:37] simplement souligner que
[1:13:40] l'Assemblée publique d'adoption
[1:13:41] des recommandations de la
[1:13:47] Commission sur le rapport
[1:13:50] prébudgétaire, sur les
[1:13:53] recommandations prébudgétaires
[1:13:54] pour le budget de Montréal,
[1:13:58] cette assemblée a été remise au
[1:14:00] 22 juin. À partir de 15 heures.
[1:14:04] Et ce sera en visioconférence.
[1:14:09] Et aussi sur le Web caste.
[1:14:12] Alors, si les gens sont
[1:14:13] intéressés à suivre toutes les
[1:14:20] recommandations qui seront
[1:14:21] faites par la commission, les
[1:14:28] recommandations prébudgétaires
[1:14:29] pour la Ville de Montréal,
[1:14:30] écoutez, le 22 juin à 15 heures,
[1:14:36] en ça va certainement vous
[1:14:37] distraire beaucoup d'écouter
[1:14:38] tout ça.
[1:14:46] - Oui, absolument, les quatre
[1:14:48] rapports habituels qui sont
[1:14:49] déposées. Mais je voulais
[1:14:50] souligner le projet connectons
[1:14:53] qui est en cours présentement
[1:14:55] pour obtenir une subvention.
[1:14:57] C'est piloté par Andrew
[1:14:59] Duffield, le directeur, avec
[1:15:03] d'autres personnes de
[1:15:04] l'organisation. Il travaille
[1:15:07] avec
[1:15:08] >> Des actionnaires stakeholders
[1:15:09] and partners in et des
[1:15:10] partenaires. The municipality
[1:15:11] and during the summer they are
[1:15:13] going to be surveying the people
[1:15:15] and residents when they are
[1:15:16] going to come at various events,
[1:15:19] such as heritage week or
[1:15:21] concerts. So don't be afraid if
[1:15:23] you see someone coming near you
[1:15:27] with a pad and a pan, pencil,
[1:15:30] and a questionnaire. We want to
[1:15:31] hear about you, for example,
[1:15:34] what can be done to help people
[1:15:36] to create better links in their
[1:15:37] neighbourhood. Obviously what we
[1:15:40] went through during the power
[1:15:41] outage, for sure some of those
[1:15:44] connections could be very
[1:15:46] helpful in this situations for
[1:15:49] some of our residences. Just a
[1:15:52] heads up. If you see Andrew --
[1:15:55] coming towards you, he's got a
[1:15:56] 20 minute questionnaire, but if
[1:16:00] you connect well with him it
[1:16:01] might go on 15 or 20 minutes.
[1:16:04] Thank you very much.
[1:16:13] - Est-ce que quelqu'un propose
[1:16:14] la levée de l'Assemblée? Qui
[1:16:15] seconde?
[1:16:19] - Je seconde.
[1:16:20] - En faveur. Tout le monde est
[1:16:22] en faveur. Même Robert est en
[1:16:28] faveur. Alors, merci beaucoup.
[1:16:32] Merci de nous avoir écoutés.
[1:16:35] >> Thank you for the people that
[1:16:36] are in the room, for all of you
[1:16:39] that are still here, to have
[1:16:41] come to this meeting. And four
[1:16:43] --
[1:16:44] Pour ceux qui sont sur la
[1:16:46] webdiffusion, encore une fois,
[1:16:47] on vous remercie de l'intérêt
[1:16:49] que vous avez.
[1:16:51] >> As you have in your city, we
[1:16:53] are extremely grateful to you to
[1:16:55] listen to what we have to say,
[1:16:57] and all the activities of the
[1:16:59] city. Thank you, goodnight, and
[1:17:01] see you next month.