[0:04] - Bonsoir. Bienvenue à la séance
[0:07] ordinaire du conseil municipal
[0:09] du 25 septembre 2023.
[0:39] - À l'unanimité.
[0:48] - Bonjour, commandant. C'est à
[0:49] vous le plancher.
[0:57] - Merci beaucoup, Monsieur le
[0:58] Maire. Bonjour, tout le monde.
[1:02] Voici le rapport des activités
[1:05] du
[1:06] (---)
[1:07] du 22 août au 25 septembre pour
[1:08] la ville de Beaconsfield.
[1:17] Tout d'abord, nous avons, je
[1:19] l'avais mentionné un peu au
[1:20] dernier conseil, la rentrée
[1:21] scolaire qui s'en venait. Et
[1:22] voilà, c'est fait, et c'est
[1:24] réussi! Du 28 août jusqu'au 1er
[1:26] septembre, plusieurs opérations
[1:28] en sécurité routière ont été
[1:29] planifiées afin d'assurer la
[1:30] sécurité de nos tout-petits lors
[1:31] de la rentrée. Comme lors des
[1:34] années passées, vous avez été
[1:35] présent dans les 16 écoles du
[1:38] secteur. En prévention et lors
[1:41] d'opérations de répression pour
[1:43] faire respecter les règles du
[1:44] Code de la sécurité routière. Au
[1:45] total, on parle de 19
[1:47] opérations, prévention et
[1:49] répression. 41 constat
[1:52] d'infraction ont été émis lors
[1:53] des opérations. J'en profite
[1:57] pour parler du fait que la
[1:59] sécurité routière, c'est
[2:00] l'affaire de tous. Nous avons
[2:01] besoin de la collaboration de
[2:02] chacun pour assurer la sécurité
[2:03] de tous les usagers. Si vous
[2:05] avez des plaintes de circulation
[2:06] dans les zones scolaires de
[2:08] Beaconsfield, n'hésitez pas et
[2:10] communiquer par courriel avec le
[2:11] porte-de... postes de quartier
[2:12] un, pardon. Sécurité routière.
[2:16] En plus de toutes les opérations
[2:18] en sécurité routière, des agents
[2:20] patrouilleur du poste de
[2:21] quartier un pour le mois d'août
[2:22] et de septembre, l'agent de
[2:25] circulation a effectué un total
[2:27] de cinq opérations vitesse
[2:28] habitant Field. Le 23 août et le
[2:30] 7 septembre, c'était
[2:32] Beaconsfield et Chow, une
[2:34] opération vitesse. Le 24 août,
[2:36] Saint-Charles et Beaconsfield.
[2:41] (---)
[2:42] Le 30 août, Beaconsfield et ne
[2:44] veut, opération en lien avec la
[2:46] rentrée scolaire, présence aux
[2:48] abords de l'école afin de faire
[2:49] respecter la signalisation. Le 7
[2:51] septembre, c'était à l'école
[2:53] Saint-Edmond, opération vitesse
[2:55] en zone scolaire. Et finalement,
[2:57] le 5 septembre, Saint-Charles et
[2:59] Peace King, opération de vitesse
[3:01] sur le boulevard Saint-Charles.
[3:02] Pour ce qui est de la patrouille
[3:04] à vélo, le 29 août, le 30
[3:06] août... en fait, le 29 août,
[3:08] c'était à l'école Saint-Rémy. Le
[3:10] 30 août, à l'école primaire
[3:12] Beaconsfield et l'école John est
[3:14] Kennedy. Le 1er septembre,
[3:16] c'était à l'école on a Christmas
[3:22] Park et l'école Saint-Rémy.
[3:23] C'est une présence de policiers
[3:24] à vélo, plusieurs dépliants ont
[3:26] été remis concernant les
[3:27] infractions constatées. Très
[3:28] belle collaboration, en passant,
[3:29] avec la sécurité publique de
[3:30] Beaconsfield. Encore pour la
[3:35] patrouiller à vélo, une
[3:36] dernière, le 7 septembre. Une
[3:39] dernière opération de vitesse à
[3:41] l'école John F. Kennedy. Pour
[3:43] les agents sociaux
[3:44] communautaires, en lien avec la
[3:46] rentrée scolaire, le 28 août au
[3:48] 1er septembre, plusieurs écoles
[3:49] de Beaconsfield, dont Sherbrooke
[3:52] Académie junior, Sherbrooke
[3:54] Académie senior, l'école
[3:55] primaire Beaconsfield et l'école
[3:57] primaire John F. Kennedy,
[3:59] visitez par les agents sociaux
[4:00] communautaires. Plusieurs
[4:02] patrouilleurs préventives et
[4:03] interaction avec parents et
[4:04] enfants et le personnel
[4:05] scolaire. Remise de dépliants
[4:07] auprès des nombreux parents
[4:09] d'élèves. C'était plus en
[4:10] prévention avec les agents
[4:12] sociaux communautaires. Le 21
[4:13] septembre, encore une fois, les
[4:14] agents sociaux communautaires
[4:16] ont rencontré toutes les
[4:17] directions des écoles du
[4:18] secteur. Ça, c'est toutes les
[4:20] directions des écoles du
[4:21] secteur. Présentation, offre de
[4:22] services, signature de l'annexe
[4:24] C et des ateliers préventifs.
[4:28] Pour ce qui est de la
[4:29] criminalité des événements
[4:32] signalés, dans la ville de
[4:35] Beaconsfield, on parle de quatre
[4:37] vols de véhicules dans les
[4:39] secteurs résidentiels, deux
[4:41] tentatives de vol de véhicules,
[4:43] un véhicule volé et retrouver,
[4:46] un vol dans un véhicule, un
[4:48] délit de fuite avec blessés. La
[4:52] victime, c'était véhicules
[4:54] versus vélo. La victime était en
[4:56] vélo. Deux vols qualifiés sur
[4:59] personne, dans le coin de Elm.
[5:01] Et une introduction par
[5:02] effraction dans une résidence
[5:03] privée. Pour ce qui est de la
[5:07] fermeture de l'autoroute 40, je
[5:09] ne vous en avait pas parlé la
[5:10] dernière fois que j'étais venu
[5:11] au micro, mais j'ai un
[5:14] engagement. Et comme chef du
[5:17] poste de quartier un, je tenais
[5:19] à vous informer que je suis
[5:23] conscient des difficultés
[5:24] auxquelles vous avez dû faire
[5:26] face pour plusieurs week-end en
[5:27] raison de la fermeture de
[5:29] l'autoroute 40. Après la
[5:30] difficile fin de semaine du 19
[5:32] et 20 août, sachez que nous
[5:34] avons mobilisé une équipe
[5:35] composée de policiers du SPVM et
[5:37] de la SQ afin de faciliter la
[5:40] circulation des résidents du
[5:41] secteur, ainsi que des services
[5:43] d'urgence. Leur mission consiste
[5:46] est également à dégager les
[5:48] voies secondaires afin d'éviter
[5:50] de paralyser la municipalité de
[5:51] Beaconsfield.
[5:58] Je suis conscient également des
[6:00] nombreuses entraves qui ont eu
[6:01] lieu ces dernières années, et je
[6:03] vous suis reconnaissant d'avoir
[6:05] fait preuve de patience. Je
[6:07] tiens à vous assurer que je
[6:08] m'engage à travailler en
[6:09] collaboration avec les nombreux
[6:12] partenaires externes
[6:15] (inaudible)
[6:16] , la Sûreté du Québec, les
[6:17] municipalités de cette ville et
[6:18] Sainte-Anne de Bellevue, pour
[6:19] mettre en place une table de
[6:21] concertation. L'objectif de
[6:23] cette table est de faciliter la
[6:24] communication et de mieux
[6:25] planifier de futures entraves
[6:28] jusqu'en 2030, compte tenu de la
[6:29] construction du nouveau pont.
[6:32] Par ailleurs, je travaille
[6:35] actuellement avec la section de
[6:37] la coordination afin de
[6:38] développer un plan d'urgence de
[6:39] circulation en cas de fermeture
[6:42] du pont ou d'accident majeur sur
[6:44] celui-ci. En attendant, je tiens
[6:46] à vous remercier pour votre
[6:48] patience et votre collaboration
[6:50] face à ce défi colossal qui
[6:51] implique de nombreux
[6:52] partenaires. Merci de votre
[6:54] confiance. Vous pouvez en tout
[6:56] temps composer le on 280-0101
[7:01] pour rejoindre le poste de
[7:02] quartier un. Ou envoyez un
[7:04] courriel au PDQ1. Vous pouvez
[7:08] également consulter notre site
[7:11] Web
[7:12] (---)
[7:13] . Vous trouverez une grande
[7:14] quantité d'information. Soyez
[7:15] assurés de notre disponibilité
[7:17] pour que toute préoccupation
[7:18] soulevée par les citoyens de
[7:19] véhiculer Field.
[7:52] - Merci beaucoup, commandant,
[7:53] pour ce rapport d'activités.
[7:54] Est-ce qu'il y a des questions?
[8:14] - Monsieur le Maire, j'aurais
[8:15] une question?
[8:16] - Oui?
[8:17] - Bonjour, Monsieur le
[8:18] commandant. Merci pour votre
[8:19] intervention. Je siège avec des
[8:23] collègues et des membres
[8:24] d'administrations sur le Comité
[8:25] de la circulation. Je voulais
[8:26] vous informer que nos réunions
[8:27] redémarre le 6 octobre. On avait
[8:30] jusqu'à récemment la chance
[8:31] d'avoir un constable qui
[8:32] participait aux travaux du
[8:33] comité, constable Mathieu, qui a
[8:35] pris sa retraite récemment. Je
[8:37] voulais juste m'assurer qu'on
[8:39] puisse avoir
[8:40] (inaudible)
[8:41] ... qui participeraient à nos
[8:43] travaux. Je pense que ce que
[8:44] vous pouvez apporter comme
[8:45] expertise, comme savoir et comme
[8:47] contribution, ça aide grandement
[8:50] nos travaux. Je voulais
[8:52] simplement vous amener ça,
[8:54] amener ça à votre attention.
[8:55] - Oui, merci pour la question.
[8:57] Oui, on a l'agent Morin est un
[9:03] agent QSR qui est à la retraite
[9:05] présentement qui va être
[9:06] remplacé le 15 octobre. C'est
[9:08] certain que vous devriez avoir
[9:09] quelqu'un qui va participer au
[9:11] comité. En fait, il va y avoir
[9:14] un policier aux cinq comités de
[9:17] consultation des cinq comités
[9:18] qu'on dessert.
[9:19] - Merci.
[9:20] - Il y a une question...
[9:25] identifiez-vous, s'il vous
[9:26] plaît.
[9:27] - Yves Bergeron, de
[9:30] Beaconsfield. Vous parlez de
[9:31] jusqu'à 2030. Vous allez faire
[9:32] un programme jusqu'à 2030.
[9:38] Pendant 7 ans, on s'attend
[9:39] encore à avoir des travaux
[9:41] importants?
[9:43] - Je peux répondre.
[9:46] - C'est ça la question?
[9:47] - C'est votre question,
[9:48] Monsieur? 2030, c'est la date
[9:51] pour le nouveau pont. Il va y
[9:53] avoir des entraves sur
[9:55] l'autoroute 40 jusqu'à 2030,
[9:57] justement, pour les travaux sur
[9:58] le pont. Je vous ai parlé de la
[10:02] fin de semaine qui a été l'enfer
[10:04] un peu partout, dont pour les
[10:07] municipalités de
[10:08] Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue et
[10:09] Senneville, qui ont coûté plus
[10:10] que n'importe qui. Suite à ça,
[10:14] l'importance du SPVM et de la
[10:16] SQ, justement, de communiquer
[10:18] avec le MTQ et de prévoir
[10:20] d'avance les fermetures, les
[10:21] entraves, parce que ce n'est pas
[10:24] juste les municipalités de
[10:26] Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue et cette
[10:27] ville. On s'en est rendu compte,
[10:28] je vous donne l'exemple...
[10:31] Baie-D'Urfé, c'était 1 heure
[10:33] d'attente de laver jusqu'à
[10:35] Lakeshore. C'était toutes les
[10:36] routes secondaires qui sont
[10:37] paralysés. Suite à ces fins de
[10:43] semaine là, j'ai vraiment
[10:44] discuté j'ai été catégorique
[10:45] avec la MTQ qu'on va devoir
[10:47] mettre une équipe de policiers,
[10:49] justement, pour pallier ça, en
[10:52] place, pour la circulation. Ce
[10:53] n'est pas juste une question de
[10:55] circulation et de sauver du
[10:56] temps, c'est aussi une question
[10:57] de s'assurer que les services
[10:59] d'urgence se rendent à
[11:03] destination attend... vous
[11:06] comprenez qu'on ne peut pas être
[11:09] dans le trafic. Il y a une
[11:10] caserne de pompiers sur Anciens
[11:12] Combattants. On doit être là,
[11:13] sur le terrain, justement pour
[11:15] faire face à ça.
[11:20] - Ce n'est pas une question
[11:22] additionnelle, c'est juste...
[11:24] j'apprécie vos efforts, mais cet
[11:26] été, on a eu des travaux sur la
[11:28] 40. Il prenait la voie de
[11:30] service pour prendre trois
[11:32] sorties. Kirkland faisait des
[11:33] travaux en même temps sur la
[11:34] voie de service. Je trouve ça
[11:35] aberrant. Une autre chose, c'est
[11:41] que les entrées sur l'autoroute,
[11:42] à cause des travaux, c'est
[11:44] dangereux. C'est absolument
[11:46] incroyable. Il y a à peu près
[11:48] 100 mètres pour entrer sur
[11:50] l'autoroute. Je ne peux pas
[11:51] comprendre que ce soit toléré.
[11:53] On entend sirènes tous les
[11:55] soirs, parce qu'il y a une voix
[12:02] pour joindre l'autre, et tout le
[12:04] monde attend, et ça cause des
[12:05] accidents tous les soirs.
[12:06] - En fait, ce dont vous parlez,
[12:08] c'est la fin de semaine qui a
[12:10] été l'enfer, le 19 et le 20
[12:11] août, quand ils ont fermé la 40
[12:13] pour dévier la circulation sur
[12:14] la voie de service. Et juste
[12:18] fermer la 40, voies de service,
[12:20] pour que les véhicules puissent
[12:22] reprendre la 40, ça a été
[12:25] l'enfer partout. C'est pour ça
[12:26] que les voies secondaires, ça
[12:28] touche le SPVM, le service
[12:31] d'urgence qu'on doit offrir aux
[12:32] citoyens. Il y a peut-être un
[12:33] enjeu de sécurité. Donc, c'est
[12:36] pour ça que suite à ça, j'ai
[12:40] rencontré les responsables du
[12:42] MTQ, justement, pour prévoir une
[12:44] équipe de circulation. Est-ce
[12:46] que ce... est-ce que ça arrivera
[12:49] à nouveau? Probablement, mais au
[12:50] moins, on va être mieux préparé
[12:51] la prochaine fois. En fait,
[12:53] c'est arrivé la fin de semaine
[12:54] d'après, la même entrave, la 40.
[12:56] Et c'était beaucoup mieux. C'est
[13:03] pas facile, hein? C'est beaucoup
[13:04] de partenaires, le MTQ, la SQ,
[13:07] le SPVM. On a aussi la Ville de
[13:09] Montréal qui est impliqué. Ce
[13:10] sont des tables de concertation.
[13:13] L'idée, là-dedans, c'est que ça
[13:14] ne tourne pas en rond et qu'on
[13:16] voit vraiment la différence sur
[13:17] le terrain.
[13:18] - Et souvent, ce sont des
[13:20] équipes qui travaillent en silo.
[13:22] - Exactement.
[13:25] - Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres
[13:26] questions?
[13:34] Alors, merci beaucoup,
[13:35] commandant.
[13:36] - Merci. Est-ce que je peux
[13:37] rajouter quelque chose, Monsieur
[13:38] le Maire? Je voulais juste dire
[13:39] qu'on a un système spécial. Tout
[13:43] citoyen qui appelle aux postes
[13:44] de quartier un sera rappelé par
[13:45] un policier. C'est important,
[13:46] c'est quelque chose que j'ai mis
[13:47] en place quand je suis arrivé il
[13:49] y a cinq mois, au poste de
[13:51] quartier un. Ce n'est plus un
[13:52] courriel, quand vous appelez,
[13:55] vous allez avoir un policier qui
[13:56] va vous répondre, qui va aller
[13:57] sur le terrain, qui va valider
[14:00] votre plainte. Je vous encourage
[14:01] à communiquer, et ça n'a pas
[14:02] besoin d'être par téléphone. Par
[14:03] courriel, on vous rappelle.
[14:04] Voilà.
[14:06] - C'est un excellent message,
[14:07] commandant. J'espère que les
[14:12] gens vont en prendre davantage.
[14:15] C'est en vous appelant, le PDQ1,
[14:17] qu'il va y avoir de l'action
[14:19] rapidement.
[14:20] - Oui.
[14:21] - Merci beaucoup, merci beaucoup
[14:22] pour cette initiative. On
[14:24] l'apprécie énormément.
[14:25] - Merci.
[14:26] - Merci.
[14:31] >> And now, we are going to -- I
[14:35] am going to answer the questions
[14:38] that we got in the mail. First
[14:43] question came from Nicole. I
[14:47] will resume the first three
[14:52] questions that were submitted,
[14:53] which will be answered by the
[14:54] administration. And I highly
[15:01] recommend in the future to ask
[15:02] that type of question that we
[15:05] summarized here, to go directly
[15:06] to the administration with her
[15:10] questions. The item that we are
[15:16] summarizing, by the
[15:18] administration, belated two
[15:20] St-Andrew, how are fees are
[15:25] applied, 45, 18, 19, and 20. And
[15:28] there was a question regarding
[15:31] pesticides, rodents, wildfires.
[15:33] Again, the administration will
[15:35] answer legal questions too
[15:37] Madame -- however, there were
[15:40] two questions that I'd like to
[15:43] answer, one was item 16.3 and
[15:49] 16.4, which is H friendly
[15:50] municipality. I love that you
[15:51] have an age-friendly
[15:54] municipality committee and goal.
[15:55] This is universal design that
[15:58] would make things accessible.
[16:00] However, there's still a lot of
[16:02] accessibility concerns in
[16:03] Beaconsfield. Please consider
[16:05] expanding and remit -- renaming
[16:07] a friendly Beaconsfield into
[16:11] accessibility Beaconsfield. The
[16:13] H friendly municipality
[16:14] committee and action plan refers
[16:16] to a municipality that has
[16:18] obtained certification from the
[16:19] Québec government AFM program.
[16:26] The term age friendly
[16:28] municipality means a
[16:30] municipality that encourages
[16:32] active participation, optimizing
[16:33] health, and safety of older
[16:35] citizens to improve their
[16:36] quality of life. And in concrete
[16:40] terms, and age friendly city
[16:42] adapts its structures and
[16:45] services so that seniors with
[16:48] disabilities and needs can
[16:49] access and have their points. As
[16:51] this is a certification, we
[16:54] cannot change the terminology
[16:55] according to our demands. The
[16:58] city of Beaconsfield has also
[17:01] adopted a universal
[17:02] accessibility action plan, which
[17:04] demonstrates that cities
[17:07] commitment taking full concrete
[17:09] measures to promote the
[17:10] inclusion, integration, and full
[17:13] participation of everyone in
[17:14] this territory. This plan is
[17:16] available for consultation on
[17:17] our website. Madame Alexopoulos,
[17:24] since you are chairman of the
[17:26] age friendly committee, is there
[17:29] everything, anything you would
[17:30] like to add?
[17:31] >> Thank you, Mister Mayor.
[17:34] Within the committee, Councillor
[17:40] Roger Moss, co-chair, we hold a
[17:42] meeting once every two months,
[17:44] and we discuss the issues that
[17:46] affect our senior residence and
[17:48] how to improve. And we actually
[17:51] have a grant coming to us. We
[17:53] applied for a grant from new
[17:54] horizons, that gives us
[17:56] structures and parks that will
[17:57] benefit our seniors. And we are
[17:59] always open to ideas if anybody
[18:01] has an idea, and they want to
[18:03] email us, and how we can
[18:04] improve, please do so. It is on
[18:05] the website. Thank you.
[18:07] >> Thank you. Second question
[18:12] from Madame Corrado's agenda
[18:16] item 30.9, ten, 11, 12,
[18:18] resolutions giving a favourable
[18:19] opinion on the recommendation by
[18:20] the Commission municipale du
[18:21] Québec, CMQ, of a property tax
[18:25] exemption for the properties
[18:26] identified as lots 2 424 402,
[18:32] 103 Biscayne. 1 417 500, 478
[18:36] Lord. And locked 2 424 016, 129
[18:41] Rowan. Also a lot 1 969 963, 330
[18:46] Sherbrooke. Why is there a
[18:50] recognition over property tax
[18:52] exemption, and how much
[18:53] financial assistance is
[18:54] involved. The immovable of that
[18:59] were identified here are used by
[19:02] the West Island seniors as
[19:05] temporary residential services
[19:07] for users with an intellectual
[19:11] disability, or an autism
[19:13] spectrum disorder, and
[19:15] therefore, they are asking the
[19:17] CAQ to be recognized as having a
[19:20] tax exemption under the act
[19:21] respecting municipal taxation.
[19:26] The city is not opposing the tax
[19:28] redemption. If it is approved by
[19:29] the CMQ. I have to also point
[19:33] out that the properties will now
[19:35] fall under the unused tax
[19:37] category. The other questions
[19:46] came from Mr. Gary pounce -- oh,
[19:52] I'm sorry. There is a third
[19:53] question here. Yes, on 275 L, if
[20:00] you approve this project, please
[20:02] mandate that the residents is
[20:04] all affordable housing, and not
[20:07] overpriced, market value Homes,
[20:08] that only which people can
[20:09] afford. Building vertically
[20:15] saves green space, please retain
[20:17] all the local businesses. It
[20:20] could all be incorporated into a
[20:22] mixed residential building with
[20:24] the housing on top and the
[20:25] businesses on the bottom. That
[20:27] way, no one loses their local
[20:31] business. Police also at an
[20:32] edition of public library to the
[20:33] site. Also, retain the trees on
[20:35] and around the site. Madame
[20:38] Corrado, this is not the city's
[20:44] project. And the services
[20:45] provided is up to the promoter.
[20:47] The space for commercial
[20:49] businesses will be determined
[20:52] based on the location of the
[20:54] project, and it is its potential
[20:55] for future commercial success.
[20:58] The planned project is mixed
[21:02] housing and commercial. And I
[21:03] have to point out that, very
[21:07] important here, that if item 40
[21:09] point to on the agenda tonight
[21:12] is adopted by Council, there
[21:14] will be a public consultation on
[21:17] the project on October 24th,
[21:20] where all residents will be able
[21:23] to participate and make
[21:26] comments, and also, exchange
[21:29] with the Council and exchange
[21:32] with the administration on this
[21:34] particular project and submit
[21:35] their concerns. Now, the next
[21:41] question is -- I have to look at
[21:45] my things here -- I thought
[21:49] there were two questions. Oh,
[21:55] okay. So, that was a question
[21:57] from Mr. pound, actually. Mr.
[21:59] pound, I'm sorry, but I did
[22:02] answer your questions on the CMQ
[22:04] property tax exemption. So, now
[22:08] you know exactly where that
[22:10] stance. Your second question is,
[22:14] Mr. pounds, 20.3 is an
[22:18] authorization of an initial
[22:20] expense of 309,000, all taxes
[22:25] included, for contract 60722-AR,
[22:29] for the construction of a new
[22:32] chalet at beacon Hill Park. The
[22:34] city originally estimated that
[22:35] the new chalet would cost $1
[22:37] million. Council approved over
[22:41] $3 million. Please, explain the
[22:42] additional expense of 309,000
[22:46] 323,000 -- those are the numbers
[22:49] that you have quoted, and I've
[22:51] quoted you. What I have to tell
[22:54] you here is that the additional
[22:57] expenses is $40,000 for the
[23:00] additional excavation, and
[23:04] 39,000 for the security system
[23:05] to be installed. There is a
[23:10] retaining wall that is also
[23:11] required. That is
[23:18] 160,745. And an additional --
[23:19] that's gonna cost 27,000. So
[23:21] that explains, I think, the
[23:23] 309,000. It's not exactly to the
[23:26] dollar because there are some
[23:29] additional other minor
[23:30] modifications that are also
[23:31] included. And now, it is up to
[23:37] the floor here for any questions
[23:38] from the floor.
[23:44] >> -- my question is an item
[23:51] 40.2 and 45.60. 45.16, the Elm
[23:57] blossom. I very much believe and
[24:03] government by rule of law, and
[24:06] I'm sure you do. And our bylaws
[24:09] are put in place to ensure that
[24:13] we have livable neighbourhoods.
[24:15] We have setbacks so that people
[24:18] don't encroach on our space. We
[24:23] have height restrictions so that
[24:25] buildings don't loom over us and
[24:26] we don't lose all sunlight. But
[24:33] this -- I read right through all
[24:34] of this. The developer is asking
[24:40] for 18 items to contravene all
[24:43] bylaws. And they don't
[24:45] contravene all bylaws nearly by
[24:47] centimetres or millimetres, but
[24:50] by whole metres. And some of
[24:52] them are multiple metres. And he
[24:55] is asking to do this in the
[24:56] middle of a neighbourhood. We
[25:03] have asked as a community, we
[25:05] have asked several times to have
[25:07] a meeting with the developer,
[25:10] and, Mister Mayor, we strongly
[25:13] suggested to the developer that
[25:15] he meets with us. And he
[25:18] obviously has no respect for
[25:20] your position or our position
[25:22] because we have not been able to
[25:23] meet with the developer. So, my
[25:25] first question is -- considering
[25:29] all of this, we request that we
[25:35] meet with the developer prior to
[25:38] any approval of this first
[25:39] draft. Once you go ahead with
[25:45] this, it is much more difficult
[25:46] for us to be heard., So, that is
[25:53] our first request. The second
[25:54] question that I have is --
[25:58] covers the very, very last item
[25:59] here. There are two members of
[26:03] the council who are on the
[26:04] Planning and Advisory Committee.
[26:08] And it says here -- which I
[26:11] don't understand at all how it
[26:12] could be said -- that the
[26:14] Planning and Advisory Committee
[26:17] is of the opinion that all the
[26:18] criteria are respected and the
[26:21] bylaws. And I would like an
[26:24] explanation of the process that
[26:27] says that a developer can come
[26:28] in, trample over all our bylaws,
[26:33] ask for setbacks which are
[26:37] contrary to everything we have
[26:38] in our neighbourhood, and
[26:41] height, also the same thing.
[26:42] Thank you.
[26:44] >> That's why we are going to
[26:46] have a public consultation on
[26:49] October 24th, so you can, in
[26:50] fact, express all your concerns
[26:55] and Council will certainly take
[26:57] them into consideration, what
[26:59] will be done and what will be
[27:01] said. Because we are not
[27:03] approving the project at this
[27:06] point. Basically, we are
[27:08] designing the bulk. And so, on
[27:13] the 24th, you will get an
[27:15] opportunity to really express
[27:17] your concerns about that. In the
[27:18] meantime, I hope that the
[27:26] developer here is very well. I
[27:28] would strongly suggest, strongly
[27:30] suggest to the promoter that he
[27:31] meets with the residents in the
[27:33] area, and explain the project,
[27:36] and explain and listen to their
[27:38] concerns, so that in the final
[27:41] project, you can also make sure
[27:45] that you incorporate some of
[27:47] those concerns, maybe not all of
[27:48] them, but some of those
[27:50] concerns, so that your project
[27:53] will be unacceptable project for
[27:55] the neighbourhood. So, I really,
[27:58] again, lead with the promoter to
[28:02] go ahead and organize that kind
[28:03] of meeting with the
[28:04] neighbourhood.
[28:06] >> Mister Mayor, you said that
[28:08] three times in just those strong
[28:12] words. The developer is
[28:13] obviously ignoring you -- as he
[28:15] is ignoring us.
[28:18] >> Well, you know, this would
[28:20] certainly come up on October
[28:22] 24th when we have a public
[28:23] consultation. And at that point,
[28:27] Council will have to take that
[28:30] into consideration, the fact
[28:32] that the promoter has not
[28:34] listened very carefully to the
[28:35] neighbourhood.
[28:38] >> Just in addition, my fear is
[28:42] if this passes tonight, then we
[28:44] have something written in stone.
[28:46] And it's much more difficult for
[28:48] us as residents to get our --
[28:54] our opinions across.
[28:57] >> I will let Mr. Chabot explain
[29:03] to you what we are going -- to
[29:05] it hasn't been adopted yet, but
[29:06] we will build on it later.
[29:09] >> Thank you, Mister Mayor.
[29:12] >> As you know, the area that is
[29:16] developed by the developer is a
[29:17] commercial area. So, there is
[29:20] nothing in the bylaw that fits
[29:22] that type of development that he
[29:24] is proposing, so that's why we
[29:26] are entering to the route of
[29:29] using the particular tiny
[29:30] program, which is included in
[29:32] the provincial law of urban
[29:33] planning. And it is exactly the
[29:36] same process that is the zoning
[29:39] change. So, today, like the Mr.
[29:42] mayor said, the proposition is
[29:45] for the parks. In the meantime,
[29:47] and I'm pretty sure he is
[29:48] hearing you right now, he has to
[29:51] meet with you. I said it clearly
[29:54] also, I transmitted the comments
[29:56] from Mr. Mayor. And I think at
[29:58] this time, because the project
[30:00] is going to go ahead,
[30:02] technically, depending on the
[30:03] council, he's gonna be meeting
[30:05] with everyone in the area, I'm
[30:07] pretty positive of that.
[30:10] >> Okay, you know, I am reading
[30:12] through this. And some of the
[30:14] items in this box, the storey
[30:19] building, we have an issue
[30:21] further down Elm. We don't want
[30:22] the same thing to happen in our
[30:23] area. And also, it looks to me
[30:27] like the developer is trying to
[30:31] crunch as many as many houses
[30:35] into that one blocked as he can.
[30:37] And if he does it the way that
[30:41] it seems to be, then he's got to
[30:43] cause a neighbourhood that is
[30:46] just not livable anymore.
[30:49] Anybody that lives there is
[30:50] going to be our neighbours too.
[30:53] They are not just gonna be each
[30:54] other's neighbours. They're
[30:55] going to be our neighbours too.
[30:56] And if he builds, as he says he
[30:58] is going to build, he is
[31:00] encroaching on our
[31:01] neighbourhood.
[31:03] >> We are not discussing tonight
[31:06] the design of the project. As I
[31:08] said, where he can work, what he
[31:13] can work with but the design of
[31:15] the project, how the project is
[31:17] actually finally going to look
[31:18] like, that will come up on
[31:23] October 24th in the proper
[31:24] consultation. And I certainly
[31:28] invite everyone with interest to
[31:31] come and make comments. At that
[31:34] time. And in the meantime,
[31:35] hopefully, the developer has met
[31:39] with the residents in the
[31:40] neighbourhood, and has listened
[31:42] to what they have to say. And he
[31:47] can come up. And it has happened
[31:50] at least one other occasion
[31:53] before, where a developer has
[31:54] met with the neighbourhood, has
[31:57] made some adjustments to the
[31:58] project, and the project got
[32:01] approved without any problem by
[32:05] anyone, everyone. But if the
[32:07] promoter, the developer is too
[32:12] stubborn to meet with the
[32:16] residents and listen to what
[32:18] they have, at the end, he may
[32:21] not have a project. So, I think
[32:23] it is very important that the
[32:27] developer listens to this very
[32:30] carefully, and goes ahead and
[32:32] makes the necessary arrangements
[32:37] to have one meeting, and maybe
[32:38] more than one meeting, if
[32:39] necessary with the
[32:40] neighbourhood.
[32:41] >> Thank you for hearing me out.
[32:48] >> I will entertain one or two
[32:50] more questions on this project.
[32:51] But no more.
[32:56] >>
[32:57] - Première des choses, il y
[32:58] avait déjà eu un zonage. Il a
[33:00] été changé pour commercial
[33:02] seulement. Ça, c'est il y a
[33:04] plusieurs années. Le zonage
[33:05] avait déjà été changé, je
[33:06] restais en arrière. Ensuite, on
[33:08] a voté un référendum disant
[33:11] qu'on ne voulait pas un deuxième
[33:13] étage, il n'y a pas si longtemps
[33:14] que ça. C'est un droit acquis,
[33:16] alors, puisqu'on l'a voté et on
[33:19] a dit: on ne veut pas un
[33:21] deuxième étage. Je suis d'accord
[33:22] pour le projet en avant, mais en
[33:24] arrière, à discuter. Ensuite, je
[33:27] ne sais pas si vous êtes au
[33:28] courant, mais il y a deux
[33:30] endroits contaminés, pas juste
[33:31] un. Parce que le nettoyage, il
[33:33] est là, maintenant. Mais avant,
[33:36] il était sur ce côté-là, il
[33:39] faisait face à Westruff. Il y a
[33:44] deux endroits contaminés, pas
[33:45] un. C'est à prendre en
[33:46] considération. Après ça...
[33:50] première des choses, pourquoi
[33:52] c'est nous, le côté nord, qui
[33:53] est obligé d'avoir tout ça. Des
[33:55] tours, des ci, des ça, vous vous
[33:57] avez les pompiers, l'hôtel de
[33:59] ville, le gym, les piscines.
[34:00] Nous, on ajuste les problèmes.
[34:04] - Vous savez, vos taxes sont
[34:08] affectés par le développement à
[34:11] Beaconsfield. Si on n'a pas de
[34:13] développement à Beaconsfield,
[34:15] malheureusement, vos taxes vont
[34:18] augmenter substantiellement.
[34:19] - Je suis d'accord avec ça...
[34:21] - Non vous, êtes d'accord avec
[34:22] plus de taxes?
[34:23] - Quand vous avez fait
[34:25] Saint-Charles, vous avez fait
[34:26] juste deux étages.
[34:27] - Vous êtes d'accord à payer
[34:28] plus de taxes?
[34:29] - Ça dépend. À Saint-Charles,
[34:30] vous avez fait du deux étages.
[34:32] Vous auriez pu en faire quatre.
[34:35] Sur Elm, après du tennis
[34:37] anciennement...
[34:38] - C'est quatre étages.
[34:40] - Oui, mais sur ce bord-ci, il
[34:42] n'y a rien.
[34:43] - Merci beaucoup.
[34:44] - C'est toujours sur notre bord.
[34:45] - Merci beaucoup. Est-ce que
[34:48] c'est encore sur le même sujet?
[34:51] Parce que je ne veux pas
[34:54] entendre 50 questions sur le
[34:55] même sujet.
[34:56] - C'est plus du point de vue de
[34:58] la logistique. Monsieur Chabot a
[35:01] dit que c'est l'équivalent d'un
[35:02] changement de zonage. Ça veut
[35:03] dire qu'il peut y avoir...
[35:06] comment vous appelez ça, un
[35:07] registre de signature? Ça...
[35:11] - Oui, absolument. À
[35:12] - Quel moment ce serait fait, à
[35:13] ce moment-là?
[35:15] - Oui, il y aura un registre de
[35:17] signature, évidemment. C'est un
[35:19] changement de zonage.
[35:21] Évidemment, s'il y a
[35:23] suffisamment de signatures qui
[35:25] s'objectent, à ce moment-là,
[35:27] selon le nombre de signatures,
[35:30] le conseil doit décider si on
[35:33] fait un référendum ou si on
[35:34] abandonne le projet.
[35:35] - Et ça, ça se fraie... après le
[35:39] 24 octobre? Où il y a un autre
[35:40] étape avant.
[35:41] - Le 24 octobre, après la
[35:43] consultation. Premièrement, on
[35:44] n'a pas établi l'échéancier
[35:46] parce qu'on ne veut pas présumer
[35:47] de la décision du Conseil. On va
[35:49] attendre de voir ce soir s'ils
[35:50] sont d'accord pour aller de
[35:51] l'avant avec le projet. À partir
[35:53] de là, le Service du greffe
[35:55] établit un échéancier très, très
[35:56] précis à l'intérieur duquel les
[35:58] dates sont données. À titre
[36:00] indicatif, un règlement sur les
[36:04] PPCMOI, la procédure d'adoption,
[36:05] c'est à peu près la même que
[36:07] ridiculement de zonage. Toute la
[36:09] procédure de consultation
[36:10] publiques, tout ça... qu'un
[36:12] règlement de zonage, pardon. La
[36:14] différence, c'est que le projet
[36:16] proposé fait partie intégrante
[36:17] du règlement. Donc, ce que vous
[36:19] voyez, c'est le projet, donc
[36:20] c'est le règlement.
[36:21] - Le règlement, de...?
[36:24] - La modification réglementaire.
[36:27] - Au lieu d'un changement de
[36:28] zonage?
[36:29] - Exact. Au lieu d'avoir des
[36:30] paramètres dans une grille
[36:32] d'usage, c'est le projet à
[36:34] proprement dit qui devient un
[36:35] peu comme le règlement.
[36:36] - D'accord. Mon autre question,
[36:38] c'est la suivante: pourquoi il y
[36:39] a deux lots?
[36:41] - Le promoteur doit construire
[36:43] par phase. Il y a des locataires
[36:45] commerciaux qui vont déménager
[36:47] dans les nouveaux locaux.
[36:49] - D'accord. Et en faisant de
[36:50] l'eau, vous pouvez faire une
[36:53] phase séparée d'une autre phase?
[36:54] - C'est ça. En plus, il y a
[36:56] aussi une autre série de l'eau
[36:57] avec les maisons de ville à
[36:58] l'arrière.
[37:00] - Et on tient compte aussi des
[37:02] réseaux huit... des ruisseaux
[37:03] souterrains, et tout ça?
[37:05] - Oui, et des déplacements de
[37:06] services. Parce qu'il y a un
[37:07] égout pluviales qui passe près.
[37:08] - Je pense qu'il y a déjà eu des
[37:10] ruisseaux en dessous de ça
[37:12] aussi.
[37:13] - C'est de la canalisation. Ça,
[37:14] c'est aux frais du promoteur. Il
[37:15] va devoir les déplacer.
[37:18] - Et vous avez tenu compte aussi
[37:20] de la pression de l'eau dans ce
[37:21] coin-là, tout ça?
[37:23] - Oui, il y a eu des
[37:24] vérifications qui ont été faites
[37:25] aux Travaux publics là-dessus.
[37:26] - Merci.
[37:27] - Merci beaucoup. Est-ce qu'il y
[37:29] a des questions sur d'autres
[37:30] sujets? Parce que je ne
[37:35] répondrai pas à d'autres
[37:36] questions sur le même sujet. Je
[37:37] pense qu'on a fait le tour de
[37:39] l'horizon là-dessus.
[37:43] >> Hi, I'm not gonna talk about
[37:44] that subject. I heard some
[37:49] yesterday that really shocked
[37:51] me. I'm getting older, as you
[37:53] know --
[37:56] >> By the way, happy belated
[37:58] birthday to you, Frank. I know
[38:00] it was yesterday.
[38:01] >> And 14 years I would be 100,
[38:03] and I would still enjoy it --
[38:05] >> Good for you.
[38:07] >> It Joe Schwartz, he's a very
[38:10] famous radio guy, chemist,
[38:16] running a society of science at
[38:19] McGill. And he said, with the
[38:22] project we've got over here for
[38:28] centennial hall, he said that --
[38:31] he did say about that project,
[38:33] but he said about McGill. He
[38:34] says we are getting all our
[38:36] books in the library, and
[38:38] putting them in the storage.
[38:40] Nobody goes to the library
[38:42] anymore. I'm not saying it's
[38:44] happening here. And that's what
[38:46] he's gonna do there. And I
[38:49] suggested, look, three or four
[38:51] years ago, let's put a skating
[38:53] rink there, we have one,
[38:56] artificial one, have the whole
[38:57] West Island --
[38:58] >> Frank, I'd like to listen to
[38:59] you. But what is your question?
[39:00] >> That is part of the question.
[39:03] >> What is?
[39:04] >> It's a preamble. It's very
[39:07] important. You are wanting to
[39:09] build a library over there as
[39:10] well. We don't need another
[39:14] library. Now, why is McGill
[39:16] throwing out all these books
[39:18] into storage? They don't have
[39:20] any -- it's a big, big, big
[39:22] change.
[39:23] >> You have to ask again, I
[39:24] can't answer that.
[39:26] >> Oh, no, come on. That's not
[39:28] up there because they are
[39:29] setting the example --
[39:30] >> I have no idea.
[39:31] >> If you're gonna spend a
[39:32] fortune there --
[39:35] >> Frank, thanks for your
[39:36] questions. I don't know if
[39:38] McGill is throwing out books. I
[39:40] have a striking feeling that
[39:42] they are not on the book burning
[39:44] expedition --
[39:45] >> Storage, I said.
[39:46] >> But are they closing
[39:47] libraries?
[39:49] >> Yes, you're gonna have a
[39:50] digital one --
[39:51] >> That's my question. Are they
[39:53] removing books and replacing
[39:54] them with a digital version? Or
[39:55] are they closing libraries? Is
[39:57] the space still there? Great,
[40:00] thank you very much.
[40:02] >> But that doesn't matter. What
[40:03] are you gonna do with the books?
[40:05] Why are you building a library
[40:06] down there if you're not gonna
[40:07] have books anywhere --
[40:09] >> Can you complete your
[40:10] question, Frank?
[40:12] >> I'm asking you why don't you
[40:14] put our rink there so kids can
[40:17] play hockey because it is too
[40:19] expensive and Beaconsfield, to
[40:21] have a drink that is subsidized
[40:22] by the whole West Island it
[40:24] would be very cheap, and it
[40:26] would run all year around.
[40:28] >> Well, thank you for your
[40:29] suggestion --
[40:30] >> It's more than a suggestion.
[40:36] >> Any other questions? Autre
[40:41] question? Pas sur le sujet du
[40:43] centre d'achat. Merci beaucoup!
[40:48] Nous allons continuer avec
[40:49] l'agenda.
[40:58] - Approbation du procès-verbal
[40:59] de la séance ordinaire de la
[41:00] ville de Beaconsfield du 21 août
[41:02] 2023.
[41:05] - Proposé.
[41:06] - Secondé. En faveur.
[41:09] - À l'unanimité. Renewal of
[41:15] contract contract TP 2020-11, TP
[41:16] 2020-11 for the collection for
[41:17] the collection and
[41:18] transportation of waste, of
[41:19] waste organic matter and bulky
[41:20] waste for the year 2024 organic
[41:21] matter, with Services Ricova
[41:22] Inc., at an approximate cost of
[41:23] bulky waste, for the year 24 --
[41:24] I don't approximate cost $1,
[41:25] 215,000, all taxes of included.
[41:27] 1 million $215,000. That is with
[41:28] all taxes included.
[41:30] >> Seconded.
[41:32] >>
[41:33] - In favour. Proposé.
[41:34] - Secondé.
[41:35] - À l'unanimité. Rejet des
[41:39] soumissions concernant le
[41:40] contrat TP 2023-13 pour
[41:41] l'installation d'un marchepied
[41:43] rétractable au parc Brookside.
[41:51] - Je propose.
[41:53] - En faveur.
[41:55] - Avis de la limiter. In
[42:01] relation to an additional
[42:02] Authorization of an additional
[42:03] expense of $309,323.41
[42:05] $309,323.41,, all taxes
[42:07] included, for contract all taxes
[42:09] included 607-22-AR, for contract
[42:10] 60722-AR, for the construction
[42:12] of for the construction of a new
[42:14] chalet at Beacon Hill a new
[42:15] chalet at Park. Proposed?
[42:16] >> Beacon Hill Park. seconded.
[42:19] >> All in favour?
[42:23] >> Five.
[42:24] >> Against?
[42:28] >> Motion carried.
[42:37] - Approbation de la liste des
[42:38] comptes à payer au 25 septembre
[42:39] 2023 et de la liste des
[42:40] paiements préautorisés pour la
[42:41] période du 10 août 2023 au 20
[42:42] août 2023 et du 22 août 2023 au
[42:43] 13 septembre 2023, pour un
[42:47] déboursé total de 3972884,76$.
[42:56] - Alors, les montants les plus
[42:58] importants sont 544397 et 67, à
[43:06] excavation Roxboro, pour la
[43:08] réfection des chaussées souples.
[43:14] Économe us construction, 280673,
[43:21] et 197648, 46, pour la
[43:23] construction de nouveaux chalet
[43:25] au parc Beacon Hill. 215291, 83,
[43:32] les entreprises
[43:33] (---)
[43:34] pour les travaux ponctuels sur
[43:35] le réseau d'égouts pluviales. Et
[43:39] 128225, transports JR? Et fils
[43:45] pour le bouclage de l'aqueduc
[43:46] (---)
[43:47] . Et finalement, les salaires à
[43:53] 632837, on 04. Propose?
[43:57] - Je propose.
[43:59] - Appuyé.
[44:00] - En faveur.
[44:02] - À l'unanimité.
[44:05] >> Approval of a $150 approval
[44:06] of contribution to the
[44:07] Beaconsfield Oldtimers Hockey
[44:08] Association for the purchase of
[44:09] $150 contribution to the
[44:10] Beaconsfield old-timers an
[44:11] advertisement in their
[44:12] Beaconsfield Old Timers hockey
[44:13] association for the purchase
[44:14] Hockey Tournament Fundraising of
[44:15] programme for the the
[44:16] Beaconsfield year 2023.
[44:17] old-timers tournament organizing
[44:18] program for year 2023. Proposed?
[44:21] >> Seconded.
[44:22] >> In favour?
[44:23] - Proposé.
[44:24] - En faveur.
[44:25] - À l'unanimité. Approbation
[44:29] d'un appui financier de 500$ à
[44:30] Refuge pour les femmes de
[44:31] l'Ouest de l'Île pour l'année
[44:34] 2023.
[44:35] - Je propose.
[44:36] - Secondé.
[44:37] - En faveur.
[44:39] - À l'unanimité.
[44:42] >> Approval of a 500 dollar
[44:44] Approval of a $500 contribution
[44:45] to contribution to West
[44:46] Arthritis West Island Self Help
[44:47] Association Island South Elm
[44:48] association for year 2023 for
[44:49] the. Year 2023.
[44:51] >>
[44:52] - Proposé.
[44:53] - Secondé.
[44:54] - En faveur. Seconded.
[44:55] >> In favour.
[44:56] - À l'unanimité. Approbation
[44:57] d'un appui financier de 1000$ à
[44:58] Centre d'action bénévole
[44:59] Ouest-de-l'Île pour l'année
[45:01] 2023.
[45:02] - Proposé.
[45:03] - Secondé.
[45:04] - En faveur.
[45:06] - À l'unanimité. Seconded
[45:09] >> In favour.
[45:10] >> Approval of Approval of a
[45:11] $1,000 1000 dollar contribution
[45:12] contribution to West Island
[45:13] Cancer Wellness Centre for the
[45:14] year 2023. to West Island Cancer
[45:15] Center for year 2023.
[45:16] >> Proposed.
[45:17] >> Seconded.
[45:18] -
[45:19] >> Proposé. In favour.
[45:20] - Secondé.
[45:21] - En faveur. À l'unanimité. 30.7
[45:24] Approbation d'un appui financier
[45:25] de 1500$ à Accompagnement
[45:26] bénévole de l'Ouest pour l'année
[45:31] 2023.
[45:32] - Je propose.
[45:33] - Secondé.
[45:34] - En faveur.
[45:35] >>
[45:36] - À l'unanimité. Approval
[45:39] Approval of a $2,500
[45:40] contribution to of Friends for
[45:41] Mental Health 2500 dollar
[45:42] contribution for the year 2023.
[45:44] to friends for mental health for
[45:46] year
[45:47] - Je 2023.
[45:48] >> Propose.
[45:49] - Secondé.
[45:50] - En faveur. Proposed.
[45:51] >> Seconded.
[45:52] >> In favour.
[45:53] - À l'unanimité. Résolution
[45:54] donnant une opinion favorable à
[45:55] la reconnaissance, par la
[45:56] Commission municipale du Québec
[45:57] (CMQ)
[45:58] , d'une exemption aux fins de
[45:59] taxes foncières pour l'immeuble
[46:00] identifié comme étant le lot
[46:01] 2424402
[46:02] (103, Biscayne)
[46:03] .
[46:04] - Proposé.
[46:05] - Secondé.
[46:08] >> Seconded.
[46:09] >> All in favour.
[46:11] - Tous
[46:12] >> En faveur?
[46:13] - À l'unanimité. Giving
[46:16] Resolution giving a favourable
[46:17] opinion on the a favourable
[46:18] opinion recognition, by the
[46:19] Commission municipale du Québec
[46:20] (CMQ)
[46:21] , of a property of the
[46:22] Commission municipale du Québec
[46:23] tax exemption for the of a
[46:24] property tax exemption for the
[46:25] movable identified as lot
[46:26] 1 417 500 immovable identified
[46:27] as lot, 1417500 it is
[46:28] (478 Lord)
[46:29] . 478 Lord. Proposed.
[46:30] - Proposé.
[46:32] >> Seconded.
[46:33] - Secondé.
[46:34] >> All in favour.
[46:35] - Tous ceux qui sont en faveur?
[46:38] - À l'unanimité. Résolution
[46:40] donnant une opinion favorable à
[46:42] la reconnaissance, par la
[46:43] Commission municipale du Québec
[46:44] (CMQ)
[46:45] , d'une exemption aux fins de
[46:46] taxes foncières pour l'immeuble
[46:47] identifié comme étant le lot
[46:52] 2424016
[46:53] (129, Rowan)
[46:54] .
[46:55] - Je propose.
[46:57] - Secondé.
[46:58] - En faveur.
[47:01] - Savent unanimité.
[47:04] >> Resolution giving a
[47:05] favourable Resolution giving a
[47:06] favourable opinion on the
[47:07] opinion on recognition, by the
[47:08] Commission municipale du the
[47:09] recognition Québec
[47:10] (CMQ)
[47:11] , of a property by the
[47:12] Commission municipale du Québec
[47:13] tax exemption for the, for
[47:14] immovable identified as lot a
[47:15] property tax exemption for an
[47:16] immovable identified as lot
[47:17] 1 969 963 1969963
[47:18] (330 Sherbrooke)
[47:19] ,. 330 Sherbrooke.
[47:22] >>
[47:23] - Proposed.
[47:24] >> Seconded.
[47:25] >> In favour. Proposé.
[47:26] - Secondé.
[47:27] - En faveur.
[47:28] - À l'unanimité. 30.13
[47:29] Participation à un colloque
[47:30] organisé par l'Association des
[47:31] directeurs généraux des
[47:32] municipalités du Québec
[47:33] (ADGMQ)
[47:34] pour la direction générale des
[47:35] municipalités du Québec du 12 au
[47:36] 13 octobre 2023 à Québec.
[47:37] - Je propose.
[47:39] - Secondé.
[47:46] >>
[47:47] - All in favour -- en faveur?
[47:48] - À l'unanimité. I was thinking
[47:51] ahead. Approval of a $125
[47:56] contribution to 125 dollar
[47:57] contribution Villa Beaurepaire
[47:58] for the purchase of an for the
[47:59] advertisement in their Gala
[48:00] programme for the year 2023.
[48:01] purchase of an advertisement in
[48:02] the Gala four year 2023.
[48:03] Proposed?
[48:04] -
[48:05] >> Proposed seconded..
[48:06] >> All in favour.
[48:08] - Secondé.
[48:10] - En faveur?
[48:11] - À l'unanimité. Demande de
[48:12] révision de la décision du
[48:13] Comité de démolition du 13 juin
[48:15] 2023 concernant le bâtiment
[48:16] situé au 69, Circle.
[48:24] - Proposed.
[48:27] >> What do you propose?
[48:30] >> I am proposing --
[48:31] >> In favour of the demolition?
[48:33] >> Yes.
[48:34] >> I second in favour of the
[48:35] demolition as well.
[48:36] >> Okay. 4 in favour of the
[48:42] demolition. And I will vote on
[48:44] this one because I am also in
[48:45] favour of that demolition. So, I
[48:49] normally don't vote, but I vote
[48:50] in favour. I vote against.
[49:00] -- motion carried. The vote is
[49:13] to maintain the decision is not
[49:15] approved. We call the vote was
[49:21] on maintaining the decision, so
[49:22] it's not approved because there
[49:24] are votes against.
[49:27] >> The decision, can't be left
[49:29] to the demolition committee --
[49:31] [Inaudible]
[49:33] >> Who seconds that? Roger -- so
[49:44] 4, boats 4, maintaining
[49:45] demolition. Maintain the
[49:51] decision -- yes, I'm sorry. So
[49:53] it is four against. And I vote
[49:56] again on that one because I
[50:00] wanted my vote to be registered
[50:02] here.
[50:05] >> The decision of the
[50:07] demolition committee to reject
[50:10] the demolition is maintained.
[50:11] The appeal is refused.
[50:18] >> Do you want to say something,
[50:19] Councillor Mercuri?
[50:23] >> Mayor, just a moment. I have
[50:24] to explain -- the recommendation
[50:30] for the decision. So, a proposal
[50:33] to maintain the demolition
[50:37] committee decision is based on
[50:39] the good standing of the
[50:43] immovable as we have discussed
[50:44] in the past. And also the
[50:48] reasonable cost of restoring and
[50:50] the immovable as it is presently
[50:52] showing.
[50:55] >> Thank you very much,
[50:57] Councilmen Mercuri?
[51:00] >> I thought I'd say a few
[51:03] words. I know the owners of the
[51:05] property are here in the
[51:06] audience this evening. I think
[51:08] they married a few comments. You
[51:11] know, the vote was four, two,
[51:18] four against demolition and two
[51:19] in favour. Myself, I am in
[51:21] favour of demolition, okay? You
[51:26] know, I understand that the
[51:29] motivation is that good standing
[51:31] of the property and the costs to
[51:36] repair or renovate. But when I
[51:38] look at the report, I conclude
[51:40] otherwise, okay? The building is
[51:44] from 1952. Je is English better
[51:49] for you guys? Peux le faire en
[51:50] français ou en anglais... okay.
[51:52] The building is from 1952. It is
[51:55] 70 years plus old. When you look
[51:56] at the evaluation, that the rain
[52:02] is 475,000, the building is
[52:05] 120,000, you can take a few
[52:06] dollars. So, the value of your
[52:08] property is not in the building.
[52:12] But it's in the land. Yes, the
[52:14] engineers report says the break
[52:16] is in good condition. The
[52:19] luminous siding is okay, some of
[52:20] it is heaved up and there could
[52:22] be water infiltration. And the
[52:23] shingles are good. That's
[52:25] positive. But the report also
[52:31] says that your garage is
[52:33] detaching from the frame of the
[52:34] home. It is sinking and must be
[52:37] demolished. The report states
[52:41] that -- so, your roof
[52:47] ventilation is possibly in
[52:49] existent. They can't find any
[52:51] opening to the roof. The windows
[52:53] and doors are 30 to 35 years
[52:54] old. We have exceeded their
[52:59] useful life. No leap holds, so
[53:06] there is poor spacing
[53:08] ventilation behind the brick
[53:09] work. So, no drains, surprising
[53:19] and worrisome giving the
[53:20] flooding that we have. The
[53:24] interior walls have cracks. And
[53:27] they noticed a major fissure
[53:29] along the ceiling, which
[53:33] indicates that their roof has
[53:36] transferred part of the
[53:38] structural weight from the roof
[53:40] to the walls. That is in the
[53:42] report. And that the engineer
[53:44] has found that additional
[53:47] framework was added to solidify
[53:48] the structure. The basement is
[53:55] only 74 inches high. I'm not a
[53:56] tall guy. But it's a bit over
[53:58] six feet, you are much taller
[53:59] than me, young men, so that's
[54:01] gonna bump your head. The
[54:03] electrical needs to be changed.
[54:05] And the repair largely exceeds
[54:08] the value of the building, these
[54:10] are all conclusions of the
[54:12] report, so, I'm having a hard
[54:15] time accepting that the building
[54:17] is in a good state, and that the
[54:19] cost is reasonable. So, for
[54:23] those reasons, I voted in favour
[54:24] of the demolition. And we can go
[54:27] into a discussion about
[54:30] demolishing homes and changing
[54:32] neighbourhoods. I hear a lot
[54:34] from residents that are
[54:36] concerned about bigger homes
[54:37] going up on properties, that is
[54:39] true, there is a concern about
[54:41] that. But we have other bylaws
[54:42] in place with setbacks, and we
[54:44] have a really strong CCU that
[54:50] ensures that new buildings fit
[54:51] into the area. And when we look
[54:52] at the other homes around, there
[54:55] is a mixture, it seems that this
[54:56] neighbourhood is in development.
[54:58] Now, as a city, we are either
[55:01] allowing for homeowners to do
[55:02] what they are allowed to do on
[55:03] their property, or not. And so,
[55:09] for myself, I was in favour of
[55:11] the demolition. However, the
[55:14] majority rules in the vote was
[55:15] against your demand. So, thank
[55:19] you for listening, thank you,
[55:20] Mister Mayor, for the time.
[55:23] >> And, Councillor Mercuri, for
[55:27] the exact reasons that you had
[55:29] verbally expressed so well, I
[55:32] also would have favoured the
[55:33] demolition.
[55:36] >> Mister Mayor, just to add --
[55:39] I am sorry that the decision was
[55:41] what it is. We try to encourage
[55:48] the communities of Beaconsfield.
[55:49] We want good families, good
[55:51] development of our homes. We
[55:52] want homes that will be here for
[55:53] another 50, 75 years. And for
[55:56] the reasons that Councillor
[55:59] Mercuri gave tonight, I also
[56:00] decided that the House is not
[56:02] worth building upon, that
[56:04] demolishing it would have made a
[56:06] lot more sense than you would
[56:07] have got in your dream home that
[56:08] you wanted. I'm just sorry, and
[56:13] my fellow councillors have the
[56:15] reasons, and they follow the law
[56:17] of what they're supposed to do.
[56:19] I do respect that. And we all
[56:22] judge according to, you know,
[56:23] our own thoughts. And hopefully,
[56:26] you can renovate and make it
[56:27] look pretty. Good luck.
[56:34] >> Any other comments from other
[56:35] councillors? Thank you. Let's
[56:40] move on.
[56:48] >> Request for approval of a
[56:51] contract Inc. project, Request
[56:52] for approval of a first draft
[56:53] for a specific alteration
[56:54] construction project, alteration
[56:55] or occupancy proposals for an
[56:56] immovable --
[56:57] (SCAOPI)
[56:58] located at for and it movable,
[56:59] 275 Elm, Beaconsfield PPCMOI,
[57:00] located at (projected lots 275
[57:01] Elm , Beaconsfield .  Projected
[57:02] lot 6 555 296 6555296, and and
[57:03] 6 555 297. 6555297 of the
[57:04] Cadastre of Québec) in zone off
[57:05] the Cadastre C330 of Québec in
[57:06] zone C330 of Zoning By-law 720
[57:09] of zoning
[57:10] (Project PP-12-1)
[57:11] bylaw 720, the project PP-12-1,
[57:12] and, upon approval, that the
[57:13] project be presented at a and
[57:14] upon public consultation on
[57:15] approval, the project needs to
[57:16] be represented at a public
[57:17] October 24, 2023, at
[57:18] consultation on 7:00 p.m.
[57:19] October 24th, 2023 at seven PM..
[57:23] - Proposed
[57:24] >> Proposed.
[57:25] >>.
[57:26] - Seconded. Seconded
[57:27] >>
[57:28] - In favour..
[57:32] >> In favour. I also will vote
[57:34] on this in favour? One because I
[57:35] think I would break the tie. So,
[57:37] against. So, I broke the tie and
[57:47] I will move on with the approval
[57:49] of the first draft. As I said,
[57:52] it's a box, it's not the
[57:56] project.
[57:57] >> Mister Mayor, if you may, I
[57:58] would like to comment.
[57:59] >> Sure.
[58:00] >> I voted in favour of this
[58:02] project, as it is being
[58:04] presented today, but if the
[58:07] promoter is listening, and for
[58:09] you, Madam, for example and your
[58:11] neighbours, I want you to know
[58:13] that although I voted in favour
[58:15] for that today, I'm completely,
[58:19] not completely comfortable with
[58:20] it. For me, it's an opportunity
[58:22] to get out in the open,
[58:24] publicly, a project that has
[58:25] been talked about, that's been
[58:27] made available to the public at
[58:30] the first showing at about this
[58:31] time last year. And so, there
[58:34] will be as a result of tonight's
[58:36] vote, a consultation process,
[58:39] where you and your neighbours
[58:40] and members of the community
[58:41] would be able to address and
[58:44] speak of their issues. You have
[58:45] mentioned in your question to
[58:47] Council and to the mayor earlier
[58:49] your fear of things being
[58:51] written in stone. Well, this
[58:52] stone is now out there but it's
[58:54] yet to be written. And as far as
[58:58] I'm concerned, it is a split
[59:00] vote, it's a very tight vote
[59:01] tonight. Again, I'm not 100%
[59:02] comfortable. And as a result of
[59:08] the following steps, which
[59:10] changes can be brought to the
[59:13] project, I hope that some of my
[59:16] reservations, and perhaps some
[59:17] viewers will be addressed as
[59:19] well, and I want you to be
[59:21] assured that if things were to
[59:22] remain exactly as they are
[59:25] today, my favourable quote
[59:26] tonight would translate to a
[59:28] negative vote in the future.
[59:30] >> Mister Mayor, can I say
[59:31] something? I heard you loud and
[59:36] clear, and I'm with you. We did
[59:39] voted -- the box is a bit too
[59:41] big. A lot of us have concerns
[59:42] as well.
[59:47] >> Any other comments? Okay, we
[59:51] will keep on moving.
[59:59] - La consultation publique est
[1:00:01] le mardi...
[1:00:02] - Le 24 octobre.
[1:00:04] - Oui.
[1:00:10] - Demande de dérogations
[1:00:11] mineures pour la propriété
[1:00:12] située au 240, Beaurepaire la
[1:00:15] recommandation est d'approuver.
[1:00:18] - Opposé.
[1:00:19] - J'appuie.
[1:00:21] - En faveur.
[1:00:26] - En unanimité. Request for the
[1:00:29] approval of site Request for the
[1:00:30] approval of the Site Planning
[1:00:31] and planning and integration
[1:00:32] Architectural Integration
[1:00:33] program related to Programme a
[1:00:34] building -- for relating to a
[1:00:35] building permit application for
[1:00:36] a new main building located at a
[1:00:37] new building 30 Madsen located
[1:00:38] at. Street Madsen. The
[1:00:39] recommendation is to refuse --
[1:00:40] internalizing the project.
[1:00:42] Council is deemed to approve --
[1:00:48] the recommendation of the CCU is
[1:00:51] to refuse but Council is to
[1:00:52] prove.
[1:00:54] >> So, do we have to vote on the
[1:00:55] recommendation?
[1:00:56] >> No, we can vote on the
[1:00:57] approval by Council.
[1:00:59] >> Okay, so the vote is for the
[1:01:04] approval of this request.
[1:01:07] >> All in favour.
[1:01:08] >> All in favour.
[1:01:11] >> Anonymous.
[1:01:17] >> Perhaps we should
[1:01:18] [Inaudible]
[1:01:20] >> Yes, please, okay. Thank you.
[1:01:30] -
[1:01:31] >> Proposed. Un proposeur pour
[1:01:32] l'approbation?
[1:01:33] - Je propose.
[1:01:34] - Secondé.
[1:01:35] - Merci, Madame Godin. À
[1:01:36] l'unanimité.
[1:01:45] - Demande d'approbation du plan
[1:01:46] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:01:48] architecturale relatifs à la
[1:01:49] demande d'un permis de
[1:01:50] construction pour un nouveau
[1:01:51] bâtiment situé au 57, dès qu'une
[1:01:52] fière de la. Recommandation est
[1:01:53] d'approuver.
[1:01:58] - Approuver.
[1:01:59] - Secondé.
[1:02:00] - En faveur.
[1:02:01] - À l'unanimité.
[1:02:03] -
[1:02:04] >> Request for the approval of a
[1:02:06] site planning of we the site
[1:02:09] planning an architectural
[1:02:11] integration program. Relating to
[1:02:12] a building permit application
[1:02:13] for the extension of the main
[1:02:14] building located at 564 Chester
[1:02:19] >> The recommendation is to
[1:02:23] refuse but --
[1:02:24] >> So we're going to vote on the
[1:02:26] refusal?
[1:02:28] >> We could have a per position
[1:02:29] to approve.
[1:02:31] >> Proposed.
[1:02:33] >> Seconded.
[1:02:34] >> Second to approve. All in
[1:02:36] favour of approval.
[1:02:40] - Irene à limiter.
[1:02:47] - On demande l'approbation du
[1:02:49] plan d'implantation
[1:02:50] d'architecturale propres à Tiff
[1:02:51] à la demande d'un permis de
[1:02:52] construction pour un nouveau
[1:02:53] bâtiment situé au 137, Gilbert.
[1:02:55] La recommandation est
[1:02:56] d'approuver.
[1:02:57] - Proposé.
[1:02:58] - Secondé.
[1:02:59] - En faveur.
[1:03:00] - À l'unanimité.
[1:03:03] -
[1:03:04] >> Request for the approval of a
[1:03:05] site planning an architectural
[1:03:07] integration program relating to
[1:03:08] a new building permit
[1:03:09] application for the main
[1:03:12] building located at 472 Pine.
[1:03:15] They want to approve.
[1:03:18] >> Proposed.
[1:03:19] >> Seconded.
[1:03:20] >> All in favour. Relatif à la
[1:03:27] demande d'un permis de
[1:03:28] construction pour le bâtiment
[1:03:29] situé au 21, Sutter.
[1:03:31] >> The recommendation is to
[1:03:32] refuse.
[1:03:33] >> Proposed.
[1:03:34] >> Seconded.
[1:03:35] >> All in favour.
[1:03:37] - Unanimité.
[1:03:39] >> Requests for the approval of
[1:03:41] the site planning an
[1:03:42] architectural integration
[1:03:44] program relating to a building
[1:03:45] permit application for the
[1:03:46] extension of the main building
[1:03:47] located at 36 hands. The
[1:03:50] recommendation is to approve.
[1:03:52] >> Proposed.
[1:03:53] >> Seconded.
[1:03:54] - En faveur.
[1:03:55] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[1:03:58] d'approbation du Plan
[1:03:59] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:04:02] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:04:03] de construction pour un nouveau
[1:04:04] bâtiment principal situé au.
[1:04:10] 45.12 125, St-Andrew. La
[1:04:13] recommandation est de refuser.
[1:04:14] - Proposé.
[1:04:15] - Secondé.
[1:04:16] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.
[1:04:18] >> Request Request for the
[1:04:19] approval of the Site Planning
[1:04:20] and for the approval of a site
[1:04:21] Architectural Integration
[1:04:22] planning an Programme
[1:04:23] architectural relating to a
[1:04:24] building permit application for
[1:04:25] the program relating to
[1:04:26] extension of the main a building
[1:04:27] permit building located at
[1:04:28] application for the extension of
[1:04:29] the main building located at 211
[1:04:30] Lakeview. The 211, Lakeview.
[1:04:31] Recommendation is to refuse.
[1:04:32] >> Proposed.
[1:04:33] >> Second.
[1:04:34] >> In favour.
[1:04:40] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[1:04:41] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:04:43] architecturale relatif à la
[1:04:44] demande d'un permis de
[1:04:45] construction pour
[1:04:46] l'agrandissement du bâtiment
[1:04:47] principal situé au 564, Chester.
[1:04:51] - Proposé.
[1:04:52] - Secondé.
[1:04:53] - En faveur.
[1:04:54] - À l'unanimité.
[1:04:55] >> Request for the Request for
[1:04:56] the approval of the site
[1:04:57] planning and approval of the
[1:04:58] Site Planning and Architectural
[1:04:59] Integration Architectural
[1:05:00] Integration Programme Programme
[1:05:01] relating to a building permit
[1:05:02] relating to a building permit
[1:05:03] application for the application
[1:05:04] for the modification of the
[1:05:05] facade of a main building
[1:05:06] located at 118 Madsen
[1:05:07] modification of the facade of. A
[1:05:08] main building located at 118
[1:05:09] Madsen. The recommendation is to
[1:05:10] approve.
[1:05:11] >> Proposed.
[1:05:12] >> Seconded.
[1:05:13] >> -- Demande d'approbation du
[1:05:18] Plan d'implantation et
[1:05:19] d'intégration architecturale
[1:05:20] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:05:21] de construction pour la
[1:05:22] modification de la façade du
[1:05:23] bâtiment principal situé au 128,
[1:05:25] Angell. La recommandation est
[1:05:28] d'approuver.
[1:05:29] - Opposé.
[1:05:30] - Secondé.
[1:05:31] - En faveur. Request for the
[1:05:32] - À l'unanimité. Approval of the
[1:05:33] Site Planning and Architectural
[1:05:36] Integration Programme relating
[1:05:38] to a building permit Request for
[1:05:39] the application for the approval
[1:05:40] of the Site Planning and
[1:05:41] Architectural Integration
[1:05:42] Programme modification of the
[1:05:43] facade of a main building
[1:05:44] located relating to a building
[1:05:45] permit at application for the
[1:05:46] modification of the facade of a
[1:05:47] main building located at 240,
[1:05:48] Stonehenge. 240, Stonehenge. The
[1:05:49] recommendation is to approve.
[1:06:00] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[1:06:01] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:06:03] architecturale relatif à la
[1:06:04] demande d'un permis de
[1:06:05] construction pour la
[1:06:06] modification de la façade du
[1:06:07] bâtiment principal situé au 300,
[1:06:08] Penn. La recommandation est
[1:06:09] approuvée.
[1:06:11] - On posait.
[1:06:13] - Secondé.
[1:06:14] - En faveur.
[1:06:15] - À l'unanimité.
[1:06:16] >> Request for the approval of
[1:06:17] the Site Planning and
[1:06:19] Architectural Integration
[1:06:22] Programme for the subdivision of
[1:06:23] the property located at 275 Elm.
[1:06:27] >> The recommendation is to
[1:06:29] approve.
[1:06:30] >> Proposed.
[1:06:31] >> Seconded.
[1:06:32] >> In favour. I would make sure
[1:06:37] now, in favour. You are not --
[1:06:40] Robert, you are not --
[1:06:42] >> Subdivision, yes.
[1:06:44] >> You are? Okay. That's great.
[1:06:46] Unanimous.
[1:06:57] Demande de certificat
[1:06:58] d'autorisation pour
[1:06:59] l'installation d'une enseigne
[1:07:00] pour le commerce situé au 240,
[1:07:01] Beaurepaire. La recommandation
[1:07:04] est approuvée.
[1:07:05] - Proposé.
[1:07:06] - J'appuie.
[1:07:07] - En faveur.
[1:07:08] - À l'unanimité.
[1:07:09] >> Acceptance of an amount of
[1:07:14] 73260,00$ for practice to be
[1:07:16] paid by the owner of lot 1417237
[1:07:19] (30 Madsen)
[1:07:20] to the City, according to By-law
[1:07:21] BEAC128 concerning contributions
[1:07:22] for the establishment,
[1:07:23] maintenance and improvement of
[1:07:24] parks, playgrounds and natural
[1:07:27] areas on the City of
[1:07:28] Beaconsfield's territory.
[1:07:34] >> Proposed.
[1:07:35] >> Second.
[1:07:40] (problème technique)
[1:08:02] (problème technique)
[1:08:12] - À l'unanimité.
[1:08:17] >> Acceptance of an amount of
[1:08:19] $45,854.80 for park fees to be
[1:08:20] paid by the owner of lot 1417495
[1:08:21] (131 Woodland)
[1:08:22] to the City, according to By-law
[1:08:23] BEAC128 concerning contributions
[1:08:24] for the establishment,
[1:08:25] maintenance and improvement of
[1:08:26] parks, playgrounds and natural
[1:08:28] areas on the City of
[1:08:29] Beaconsfield's territory.
[1:08:37] - En faveur.
[1:08:38] - À l'unanimité.
[1:08:50] - J'appuie.
[1:08:51] - En faveur.
[1:08:52] - À l'unanimité.
[1:08:58] >>
[1:09:00] - Je propose. Nomination in view
[1:09:01] of
[1:09:02] - Permanency as Technicien en
[1:09:03] génie civil et inspecteur to
[1:09:04] position 5102 en faveur.
[1:09:05] -.
[1:09:15] Proposé.
[1:09:18] >> Any comments Mister Chairman?
[1:09:20] >> Just a reminder, there will
[1:09:23] be public
[1:09:24] - Consultation on October 24th.
[1:09:25] Le 24 octobre. Details will
[1:09:27] follow. There will be
[1:09:28] communications on that for that
[1:09:29] particular project as well.
[1:09:32] - Merci.
[1:09:33] >> I second.
[1:09:35] - En faveur.
[1:09:37] - À l'unanimité.
[1:09:40] >> Recommendation to
[1:09:41] Hydro-Québec for reviewing their
[1:09:43] budgetary shun maintenance cycle
[1:09:45] with the purpose to increase the
[1:09:46] frequency of interventions on
[1:09:47] the City of Beaconsfield's
[1:09:49] territory.
[1:09:50] >> I propose.
[1:09:53] >> I second.
[1:09:54] >> In favour.
[1:09:57] - À l'unanimité. 45.15 Demande
[1:10:00] d'approbation du Plan
[1:10:01] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:10:02] architecturale
[1:10:03] (PIIA)
[1:10:04] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:10:05] de construction pour la
[1:10:06] modification de la façade du
[1:10:07] bâtiment principal situé au 300,
[1:10:08] Penn.
[1:10:10] -
[1:10:11] >> Proposed.
[1:10:12] >> Second.
[1:10:13] >> In favour. Request for
[1:10:15] financial à l'unanimité. Support
[1:10:17] for the update of the policy and
[1:10:18] action plan for Age-Friendly
[1:10:22] Municipalities for 2023-2027.
[1:10:27] >> Proposed.
[1:10:28] >> Second.
[1:10:29] >> In favour.
[1:10:34] - Désignation de la
[1:10:35] représentation de la
[1:10:36] municipalité pour le suivi de la
[1:10:37] demande d'aide financière pour
[1:10:38] la mise à jour du plan d'action
[1:10:40] municipalités amies des aînés.
[1:10:42] 2023, 2027.
[1:10:46] - En faveur.
[1:10:48] - À la unanimité.
[1:10:50] >> Approval of the final report
[1:10:52] on the financial assistance
[1:10:53] granted by the Union des
[1:10:54] Municipalités du Québec and the
[1:10:55] Government of Quebec as part of
[1:10:56] the Fous du français project for
[1:10:58] the year 2022-2023.
[1:11:05] >> Proposed.
[1:11:06] -
[1:11:07] >> In favour. Alinéa limité.
[1:11:10] - Autorisation pour la fermeture
[1:11:12] de rue pour l'événement du jour
[1:11:14] du français le 4 novembre 2023
[1:11:16] de 10 heures à 11 heures.
[1:11:17] - Je compose. Je propose,
[1:11:21] pardon.
[1:11:22] - Appuyé.
[1:11:23] - En faveur.
[1:11:24] - À l'unanimité.
[1:11:25] >> Authorization to allow the
[1:11:26] Friends of Beaurepaire Village
[1:11:27] to host a special Marché Beau,
[1:11:28] Holiday Market event in the
[1:11:29] Christmas Park tennis court
[1:11:31] parking area, to use the Park's
[1:11:32] chalet on Saturday, November 25,
[1:11:33] 2023, from 1 to 8 p.m. and that
[1:11:38] costs for First Aid Services be
[1:11:39] paid by the City.
[1:11:44] >> Proposed.
[1:11:45] >> Seconded.
[1:11:46] >> In favour.
[1:11:48] - À l'unanimité. 45.15 Demande
[1:11:53] d'approbation du Plan
[1:11:54] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:11:55] architecturale
[1:11:56] (PIIA)
[1:11:57] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:11:58] de construction pour la
[1:11:59] modification de la façade du
[1:12:00] bâtiment principal situé au 300,
[1:12:01] Penn.
[1:12:09] >> Proposed.
[1:12:11] >> Second.
[1:12:12] >> All in favour.
[1:12:15] >> I was thinking in -- it
[1:12:18] sounds like we're getting a spot
[1:12:19] the rec center, but we're not
[1:12:21] getting a spot the rec center.
[1:12:22] You know? If
[1:12:26] >> Your shirt?
[1:12:27] >> I could be wrong but that's
[1:12:28] not what we voted on.
[1:12:31] >> Mayor's report on the
[1:12:32] decisions made by the
[1:12:33] Agglomeration Council at its
[1:12:34] meetings of August 24 and
[1:12:35] September 21, 2023.
[1:12:39] >> Since I was replaced at that
[1:12:41] meeting by Councillor boss, any
[1:12:43] comments, Councillor boss, on
[1:12:47] the August 24 meeting?
[1:12:48] >> I have no comments on the
[1:12:51] September -- I'll make it short.
[1:12:54] Anyway, we spent, the City of
[1:12:58] Montréal spent a lot of money
[1:13:00] that week. And
[1:13:03] [Inaudible]
[1:13:04] The kitchen kind of thing. It
[1:13:06] was supposedly needed by the
[1:13:08] City of Montréal and paid for by
[1:13:10] the Anglo, including the rear
[1:13:12] taxes that were being overtaxed
[1:13:14] on that the last few years, and
[1:13:17] continuing to go forward. So we
[1:13:19] have absolutely no say as
[1:13:22] Beaconsfield or as with the
[1:13:26] association of the large suburb.
[1:13:28] That's more of the same for me
[1:13:30] but it was an interesting
[1:13:31] experience. Mister Mayor.
[1:13:36] >> Thank you very much. I found
[1:13:39] the same thing -- with a lot of
[1:13:42] money being spent.
[1:13:50] - Dépôt des rapports des
[1:13:51] directeurs.
[1:13:53] - Il n'y a pas de dépôt. Merci.
[1:13:57] >>
[1:13:58] - Closing of meeting.
[1:13:59] >> I'll alors, c'est say la
[1:14:00] levée de la I love it this
[1:14:01] sounds -- séance. Qui propose?
[1:14:07] Alors, tout le monde est en
[1:14:09] faveur. Les gens sont en faveur
[1:14:10] de la levée de la séance. Merci
[1:14:13] beaucoup pour avoir été parmi
[1:14:14] nous ce soir.
[1:14:17] >> Thank you very much for being
[1:14:18] with us this evening. And to
[1:14:20] those of you that have been
[1:14:23] watching the webcast, again,
[1:14:26] thank you for the interest and
[1:14:28] the activities of the city.
[1:14:31] Merci beaucoup pour ceux qui
[1:14:33] nous voient sur la webdiffusion.
[1:14:37] Votre intérêt en la ville de
[1:14:40] Beaconsfield est très précieux.
[1:14:42] C'est très apprécié. Alors merci
[1:14:43] et à la prochaine rencontre le
[1:14:44] mois prochain. Thank you and see
[1:14:48] you next
[1:14:49] | | |
[1:14:51] Monday.
[1:14:52] | | |