1
00:00:03,966 --> 00:00:06,966
- Bonsoir et bienvenue à la

2
00:00:06,966 --> 00:00:08,933
réunion ordinaire du conseil

3
00:00:08,933 --> 00:00:12,733
municipal de lundi, le 25 mars.

4
00:00:12,733 --> 00:00:15,800
>> Good evening and welcome to

5
00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:18,800
the regular meeting of the

6
00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:23,800
municipal council of March 25th.

7
00:00:27,966 --> 00:00:31,366
I would like to start by making

8
00:00:31,366 --> 00:00:34,366
--

9
00:00:55,133 --> 00:00:57,166
>> Mulroney's tenure as prime

10
00:00:57,166 --> 00:00:58,166
minister was marked by the

11
00:00:58,166 --> 00:01:01,000
introduction of major economic

12
00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:06,000
reforms. En mémoire du très

13
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,000
honorable et ancien premier

14
00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:10,000
ministre, Brian Mulroney, et par

15
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:12,000
respect à sa famille, je vous

16
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:13,000
invite à vous lever et observer

17
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:16,000
un moment de silence.

18
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:27,000
(silence)

19
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:53,000
merci.

20
00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:12,000
Alors, nous allons procéder avec

21
00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:15,000
l'ouverture de la réunion.

22
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:34,000
- Alors, avant qu'on passe aux

23
00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:38,000
questions écrites, j'aimerais

24
00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:41,000
premièrement remercier la

25
00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:44,000
conseillère Dominique Godin pour

26
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:46,000
m'avoir remplacé durant le mois

27
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:48,000
de février. C'était elle qui

28
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:51,000
était la mairesse à ce moment-là

29
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,000
pour tout le mois de février,

30
00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:57,000
merci de m'avoir aussi remplacé

31
00:02:57,000 --> 00:02:59,000
au conseil de ville du mois de

32
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:01,000
février. Alors merci beaucoup,

33
00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:03,000
Dominique, un travail excellent.

34
00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:07,000
- Ça fait plaisir.

35
00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:11,000
- J'aimerais aussi souligner que

36
00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:16,000
nous avons eues des athlètes aux

37
00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:18,000
Jeux du Québec qui ont eu lieu à

38
00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:22,000
Sherbrooke. Plusieurs athlètes

39
00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:28,000
des Beaconsfield ont remporté

40
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:29,000
des médailles. Je vais les

41
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:31,000
nommer.

42
00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:34,000
(---)

43
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:35,000
, médaille d'or pour le

44
00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:40,000
badminton. Roger l'ail, médaille

45
00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:42,000
d'argent pour le badminton

46
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:46,000
aussi. Et

47
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:47,000
(---)

48
00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:51,000
pour lors, pour le badminton et

49
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:53,000
(---)

50
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,000
aussi a une médaille d'or pour

51
00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:58,000
l'équipe. La première, c'était

52
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:01,000
pour le double et là, c'est pour

53
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:04,000
l'équipe. Il y a aussi Kobe vous

54
00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:05,000
skier, médaille d'or pour le

55
00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:09,000
curling.

56
00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:10,000
(---)

57
00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:11,000
, médaille d'argent pour le

58
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:15,000
hockey féminin. Sierra Austin,

59
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:17,000
une médaille d'argent pour le

60
00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:21,000
hockey féminin. Et aussi, Sofia

61
00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:22,000
Isabella

62
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:23,000
(---)

63
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:26,000
, une médaille d'argent pour le

64
00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:28,000
hockey. Alors félicitations à

65
00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:29,000
tous ces athlètes de

66
00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:31,000
Beaconsfield. Je pense qu'il

67
00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:32,000
mérite une main

68
00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:33,000
d'applaudissements.

69
00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:36,000
(applaudissements)

70
00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:42,000
Alors maintenant nous allons,

71
00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:44,000
passer... j'aimerais mentionner

72
00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:46,000
aussi que le commandant,

73
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:50,000
normalement, le commandant du...

74
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:53,000
de la police, il va être avec

75
00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:57,000
nous en avril seulement, je

76
00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:00,000
crois qu'il cumule présentement

77
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:05,000
deux fonctions, celle de... un

78
00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:10,000
autre pays ADQ cinq. PDQ5,

79
00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:14,000
pardon. Malheureusement, il ne

80
00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:15,000
peut pas passer autant de temps

81
00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:16,000
qu'il aimerait avec nous au

82
00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:19,000
Conseil.

83
00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:25,000
-- if I remember correctly and

84
00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:28,000
homes can be enforced. I've

85
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:29,000
experienced a feeling of

86
00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:31,000
suffocation for more than three

87
00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:33,000
weeks recently until I stopped

88
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:35,000
the habit of opening my windows

89
00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:37,000
every night for half an hour.

90
00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:40,000
Which I was practising the

91
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:43,000
entire summer. --

92
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:01,000
>> What measures Beaconsfield --

93
00:07:01,000 --> 00:07:03,000
fireplaces comply or have

94
00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:06,000
certification that guarantees in

95
00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:08,000
the emission rate equal or less

96
00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:10,000
to 2.5 grams of fine particles

97
00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:12,000
per hour and into the

98
00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:15,000
atmosphere, and to ban wood fire

99
00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:17,000
places that do not comply from

100
00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:20,000
being used. I would like to see

101
00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:22,000
Beaconsfield also implement a

102
00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:24,000
verification program and

103
00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:25,000
implement a ban on the use of

104
00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:27,000
noncompliant wood burning stoves

105
00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:30,000
and fireplaces. Thank you very

106
00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:35,000
much -- so, our answer to -- is

107
00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:39,000
that the enforcement is

108
00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:40,000
primarily complaint based. In

109
00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:44,000
other words, we cannot act on

110
00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:49,000
patrolling the city and watch

111
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,000
what is wood burning, but if you

112
00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:53,000
have a complaint, that's the way

113
00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:56,000
that we will react. We have not

114
00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:59,000
received any complaints and no

115
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:01,000
infraction has been issued to

116
00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:04,000
date. As mentioned at the last

117
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:06,000
two council meetings, we

118
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:08,000
reiterate that if you are

119
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:10,000
witnessing in your neighbourhood

120
00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:14,000
continues burning, please do not

121
00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:15,000
hesitate to call Municipal

122
00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:18,000
patrol and give them the address

123
00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:22,000
right away. A permit is also

124
00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:26,000
required in order to install a

125
00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:27,000
compliant fireplace,

126
00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:28,000
documentation is required in

127
00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:30,000
order to obtain the permit

128
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:33,000
showing the make and model, and

129
00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:38,000
the location in the home. The

130
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:43,000
second questions or the second

131
00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:47,000
person to ask a question is Mr.

132
00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:52,000
Derrick pounds -- his questions

133
00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,000
are on an agenda item 40.1,

134
00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:59,000
40.2, 40.3, and 40.4 for March

135
00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:03,000
25th -- council meeting. In good

136
00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:04,000
faith and a spirit of

137
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:06,000
transparency, can you justify

138
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:07,000
the reason for each of these

139
00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:10,000
loans and explain clearly there

140
00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:15,000
consequences of these loans

141
00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:17,000
totaling 8,206,490 53 for

142
00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:18,000
Beaconsfield taxpayers? I will

143
00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,000
ask our director general to

144
00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,000
please answer those questions.

145
00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:25,000
>> My pleasure, Mister Mayor.

146
00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:29,000
So, to Mr. pounces questions,

147
00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:32,000
item 40.1, which is related to

148
00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:35,000
the centennial jetty, it's a

149
00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:36,000
boring bylaw to help us to pay

150
00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:40,000
for the contract if it's awarded

151
00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:43,000
tonight. So, the jetty is a

152
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:45,000
project that was approved by the

153
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,000
minister of environment,. In

154
00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:49,000
fact, we made an application

155
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:50,000
many years ago, at least five

156
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:53,000
years ago, to have a certificate

157
00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:56,000
of authorization to do work in

158
00:09:56,000 --> 00:09:59,000
the embankment on the riverside.

159
00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:01,000
It takes many years for us to

160
00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:03,000
get those certifications from

161
00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:05,000
the Ministry, so it's been more

162
00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:07,000
than five years. That we have

163
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:11,000
started to want to fix the

164
00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:12,000
jetty. If you will walk there,

165
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:14,000
you will see that's parts of it

166
00:10:14,000 --> 00:10:15,000
that are going down the lake and

167
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:18,000
it's becoming dangerous. So,

168
00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:20,000
this is to help us do the work

169
00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:23,000
and fix the jetty for hopefully

170
00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:26,000
very long period of time. The

171
00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:29,000
second boring bylaw, which is

172
00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:32,000
related to the construction of

173
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:35,000
work for the retention basin

174
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:37,000
tower and helm in that area. In

175
00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:40,000
fact, the retention basin is

176
00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:43,000
going to be linked with larger

177
00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:44,000
pipes. We're over sizing some of

178
00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,000
the pipes to make sure they

179
00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:49,000
flow, it doesn't flow as fast

180
00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:52,000
into the middle Brook creek when

181
00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:54,000
it goes too fast, something's

182
00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:55,000
coming blocked the creek, then

183
00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:56,000
it backs up and it could create

184
00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:58,000
some problems, as some of our

185
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:01,000
residents in that area have

186
00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:02,000
suffered in some of the past

187
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:03,000
years, and we think that this

188
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:07,000
solution would be very helpful

189
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:11,000
to avoid those backups in the

190
00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:14,000
drainage system. 40.3 is related

191
00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:16,000
to sanitary sewer pipes and

192
00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:18,000
various sectors of the city. So,

193
00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:20,000
this is our annual boring bylaw

194
00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:22,000
for underground infrastructure.

195
00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:24,000
Sometimes it's for sewers,

196
00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:27,000
sometimes it's for water mains.

197
00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:30,000
So, this is our kind of annual

198
00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:33,000
regular boring bylaw and -- in

199
00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:35,000
order to prepare plans is to

200
00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:37,000
prepare plans inspects for

201
00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:39,000
engineers and architects. Item

202
00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:42,000
40.4, I'm sorry. So, boring

203
00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,000
bylaws two -- by architects for

204
00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:46,000
the renovation. Work that needs

205
00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:48,000
to be carried out at the

206
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:51,000
recreation center. I believe if

207
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:53,000
you want the reason we are not,

208
00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:56,000
you could see that the center is

209
00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:59,000
aging and it needs lots of TLC.

210
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:01,000
So, when fixing infrastructure

211
00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:03,000
is requiring important funds, it

212
00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:04,000
is financially appropriate to

213
00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:06,000
loan the money to support

214
00:12:06,000 --> 00:12:08,000
municipalities to perform the

215
00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:10,000
required work to fix its

216
00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:11,000
infrastructure. So, many of

217
00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:12,000
those loans are related to

218
00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:14,000
grants from the provincial and

219
00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:16,000
federal governments, such as

220
00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:18,000
what we call a gas tax, for

221
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:19,000
example. The loans that we're

222
00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:20,000
looking at tonight are made on

223
00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:23,000
20 years boring duration, so

224
00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:25,000
that's to answer Mr. -- the

225
00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:27,000
question about the Beaconsfield

226
00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:29,000
taxpayers and the impact on

227
00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:30,000
taxpayers from when the work is

228
00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:32,000
performed, the need to borrow,

229
00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:35,000
it takes about two years before

230
00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:36,000
it does have an impact on the

231
00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:39,000
budget. After two years, the

232
00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:40,000
work is performed, it's

233
00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:42,000
transmitted into the taxes, for

234
00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:44,000
example. A 1 million dollar loan

235
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:46,000
at 5% interest represents an

236
00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:50,000
annual cost of $80,200 in our

237
00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:52,000
budget, capital interest for, in

238
00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:54,000
this case, would be 20 years,

239
00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:58,000
for example. That's $12.16, or

240
00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:02,000
0.17%. Everything being equal on

241
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:04,000
the average house, property

242
00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:06,000
house in Beaconsfield for 2024.

243
00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:10,000
Of course, we're talking 2026 or

244
00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:11,000
2027 and some of those boring

245
00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:12,000
bylaws will be with us for

246
00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:14,000
three, four, and five years. For

247
00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:16,000
example, the architects, they're

248
00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:18,000
not doing the work in one year.

249
00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:20,000
It's a four, five-year project.

250
00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:22,000
We must take into account though

251
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:25,000
that if there is an increase in

252
00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:28,000
our debt service capital

253
00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:29,000
interest, when we have a new

254
00:13:29,000 --> 00:13:32,000
bylaw, we also have old bylaws

255
00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:35,000
that are released from our

256
00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:36,000
capital interest because there

257
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:38,000
are some bylaws that are 20

258
00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:41,000
years old that will be not

259
00:13:41,000 --> 00:13:44,000
paying any more. So, there is a

260
00:13:44,000 --> 00:13:45,000
rolling effect on the bylaws

261
00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:49,000
that we have. When the city. So,

262
00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:51,000
we might have to increase our

263
00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:53,000
debt to meet the needs at the

264
00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:56,000
present time. But our debt is

265
00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:58,000
very low, Mister Mayor, as you

266
00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:00,000
know. We will be able sometime,

267
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:02,000
probably the next budget, to

268
00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:03,000
present some statistics about

269
00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:06,000
our debt level and the capacity

270
00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:09,000
that we have to increase our

271
00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:12,000
debt to face our

272
00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:13,000
infrastructures.

273
00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:16,000
>> If I'm not mistaken, Mr.

274
00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:18,000
Boileau, whenever we increase

275
00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:20,000
our debt, we eventually increase

276
00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:21,000
taxes.

277
00:14:21,000 --> 00:14:23,000
>> Exactly, it does. If we're

278
00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:26,000
able to remove some of the debt,

279
00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:27,000
everything would be equal, there

280
00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:29,000
is no concern. But when we

281
00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:30,000
increase the debt more, it does

282
00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:32,000
have an impact on taxes.

283
00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:34,000
>> I just want to make sure

284
00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:37,000
everybody understands that debt

285
00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:38,000
is not like our prime minister

286
00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:41,000
says, we can't forget about it.

287
00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:43,000
It has to be repaid somehow and

288
00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:48,000
it does also increase -- taxes.

289
00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:52,000
The next question is from Nicole

290
00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:57,000
-- from Saint Andrew.

291
00:14:57,000 --> 00:14:58,000
- Je pense que vous avez oublié

292
00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:01,000
la question deux.

293
00:15:01,000 --> 00:15:02,000
- Tu vas répondre...

294
00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:03,000
- Vous n'avez pas lu la

295
00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:07,000
question. La question deux,

296
00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:10,000
d'accord. So yeah, Mister pounds

297
00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:11,000
I guess asked a second question

298
00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:13,000
in good faith and the spirit of

299
00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:14,000
transparency, can you clarify

300
00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:16,000
what is implied by the

301
00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:17,000
authorization to sign

302
00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:18,000
professional services agreements

303
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:21,000
with the finalist of the

304
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:23,000
architectural competition? We --

305
00:15:23,000 --> 00:15:25,000
imagine centennial project. How

306
00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:27,000
much expense is involved for

307
00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:29,000
Beaconsfield taxpayers and will

308
00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:32,000
alone bylaw be required?

309
00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:33,000
>> Already has, Mister Mayor.

310
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:35,000
So, Jerry council appointed

311
00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:37,000
residents and professionals on

312
00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:39,000
the jury of the architectural

313
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:41,000
contest for the imagine

314
00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:42,000
Centennial project. At the same

315
00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:45,000
time, the contest was launched,

316
00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:46,000
inviting architects to submit

317
00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:48,000
proposals to the jury. The rules

318
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:50,000
of the contest are slightly

319
00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:52,000
different than irregular

320
00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:56,000
tendering process, so the

321
00:15:56,000 --> 00:15:57,000
minister issued an approval to

322
00:15:57,000 --> 00:15:58,000
the City to award the contract

323
00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:01,000
via the requirements of our

324
00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:02,000
architectural contest. The jury

325
00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:04,000
will soon be judging the

326
00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:05,000
proposals submitted by the

327
00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:06,000
candidates as part of the first

328
00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:08,000
phase. From there, four

329
00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:11,000
finalists will be chosen by the

330
00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:13,000
jury to prepare detailed designs

331
00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:16,000
and their ideas on the project,

332
00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:18,000
as approved by the -- finalist

333
00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:20,000
will receive professional fees,

334
00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:22,000
which are determined by the

335
00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:23,000
professional decree for the

336
00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:24,000
second phase of architectural

337
00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:26,000
competitions. The four finalists

338
00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:30,000
will be announced in April and

339
00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:32,000
information will be added to our

340
00:16:32,000 --> 00:16:33,000
dedicated section of the website

341
00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:35,000
for the imagined project. The

342
00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:37,000
cost of this step in the process

343
00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:40,000
of the project is around 400 to

344
00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:43,000
$500,000. The money will come

345
00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:46,000
from our reserve for

346
00:16:46,000 --> 00:16:48,000
professional services. As

347
00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:51,000
mentioned last year, I am sure

348
00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:52,000
many of us have forgotten

349
00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:54,000
already, we will receive a

350
00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:55,000
substantial grant for this

351
00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:57,000
project in the order of $300

352
00:16:57,000 --> 00:16:59,000
million from the minister of

353
00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:01,020
communications and culture. An

354
00:17:01,020 --> 00:17:02,020
official announcement should

355
00:17:02,020 --> 00:17:06,020
also be made in April.

356
00:17:07,020 --> 00:17:09,020
>> Thank you, Mister Mayor.

357
00:17:09,020 --> 00:17:10,020
>> Thank you very much, Mr.

358
00:17:10,020 --> 00:17:14,020
Boileau. While we will go to the

359
00:17:14,020 --> 00:17:17,020
question that was asked by Madam

360
00:17:17,020 --> 00:17:20,020
Colorado from Saint Andrew. Her

361
00:17:20,020 --> 00:17:24,020
first question is on 30.8, West

362
00:17:24,020 --> 00:17:26,020
Island association for the

363
00:17:26,020 --> 00:17:30,020
intellectually handicapped. Mrs.

364
00:17:30,020 --> 00:17:31,020
Colorado asked a question

365
00:17:31,020 --> 00:17:34,020
regarding financial support for

366
00:17:34,020 --> 00:17:36,020
the neurodivergent community. I

367
00:17:36,020 --> 00:17:39,020
will not read all the preamble

368
00:17:39,020 --> 00:17:43,020
which is -- but Madame -- our

369
00:17:43,020 --> 00:17:45,020
director of culture and leisure

370
00:17:45,020 --> 00:17:48,020
will answer the questions to you

371
00:17:48,020 --> 00:17:51,020
directly. We

372
00:17:51,020 --> 00:17:54,020
>> The next question from madame

373
00:17:54,020 --> 00:17:58,020
Corrado was on 20.4, 30.4, and

374
00:17:58,020 --> 00:18:01,080
30.9, tree planting -- club

375
00:18:01,080 --> 00:18:05,080
contract. Please invest more in

376
00:18:05,080 --> 00:18:07,080
tree planting, we -- engage the

377
00:18:07,080 --> 00:18:09,080
public in tree planting. I

378
00:18:09,080 --> 00:18:11,080
really enjoyed the events at the

379
00:18:11,080 --> 00:18:13,080
dog park last year. I'm quite

380
00:18:13,080 --> 00:18:15,080
concerned about the 1600 dollars

381
00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:17,080
given to the annual greens

382
00:18:17,080 --> 00:18:19,080
maintenance of the lawn bowling

383
00:18:19,080 --> 00:18:22,080
Club behind -- annex. The lawn

384
00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:24,080
bowling Club uses synthetic and

385
00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:26,080
toxic herbicides and pesticides,

386
00:18:26,080 --> 00:18:29,080
all of which are toxic to the

387
00:18:29,080 --> 00:18:32,080
environment. Carcinogenic and

388
00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:36,080
tested on animals. A senior

389
00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:37,080
friendly municipality should not

390
00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:40,080
be spraying -- or 2.4 D or any

391
00:18:40,080 --> 00:18:43,080
other chemicals at a place where

392
00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:45,080
our elderly residents love to

393
00:18:45,080 --> 00:18:47,080
hang out. It is also cheaper and

394
00:18:47,080 --> 00:18:49,080
in the long run to use organic

395
00:18:49,080 --> 00:18:52,080
methods of weed control. Two

396
00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:54,080
places in the USA have done this

397
00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:55,080
quite successfully. One golf

398
00:18:55,080 --> 00:18:57,080
course and one lawn bowling

399
00:18:57,080 --> 00:19:00,040
Club. The -- permit is almost

400
00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:02,040
up, please do not renew it and

401
00:19:02,040 --> 00:19:06,040
go organic instead. She mentions

402
00:19:06,040 --> 00:19:09,040
to the lawn bowling Club in the

403
00:19:09,040 --> 00:19:11,040
States and the golf club in the

404
00:19:11,040 --> 00:19:13,040
States. I will not get into

405
00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:17,040
that. But my response to her is

406
00:19:17,040 --> 00:19:19,040
thank you for expressing your

407
00:19:19,040 --> 00:19:21,040
concerns regarding the use of

408
00:19:21,040 --> 00:19:22,040
synthetic herbicides and

409
00:19:22,040 --> 00:19:26,040
pesticides at the lawn bowling

410
00:19:26,040 --> 00:19:27,040
Club behind the herb --

411
00:19:27,040 --> 00:19:29,040
regarding the regulations

412
00:19:29,040 --> 00:19:31,040
covering the use of pesticides

413
00:19:31,040 --> 00:19:33,040
at the lawn bowling Club, it is

414
00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:34,040
essential to emphasize that

415
00:19:34,040 --> 00:19:38,040
while the use of pesticides is

416
00:19:38,040 --> 00:19:41,040
authorized, as per the beak one

417
00:19:41,040 --> 00:19:43,040
for bylaw, concerning the use of

418
00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:45,040
pesticides, it must be done in

419
00:19:45,040 --> 00:19:47,040
compliance with strict

420
00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:48,040
guidelines outlined in article

421
00:19:48,040 --> 00:19:51,040
six of the bylaw. These

422
00:19:51,040 --> 00:19:52,040
regulations include requirements

423
00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:54,040
for the lawn bowling Club

424
00:19:54,040 --> 00:19:57,040
operator to submit a written

425
00:19:57,040 --> 00:19:58,040
declaration of the products

426
00:19:58,040 --> 00:20:01,000
intended for use, post signage

427
00:20:01,000 --> 00:20:03,000
after spring, maintain a

428
00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:04,000
registry of pesticides

429
00:20:04,000 --> 00:20:07,000
applications, and submit the

430
00:20:07,000 --> 00:20:09,000
pesticide reduction plan every

431
00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:11,000
three years. Given these

432
00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:13,000
regulations, I can assure you

433
00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:14,000
that the city is committed to

434
00:20:14,000 --> 00:20:16,000
ensuring that any pesticide use

435
00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:18,000
of the lawn bowling Club is

436
00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:21,000
carried out responsibly and

437
00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:24,000
transparently. We will closely

438
00:20:24,000 --> 00:20:25,000
monitor compliance with these

439
00:20:25,000 --> 00:20:26,000
regulations and work with the

440
00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:30,000
lawn bowling Club management to

441
00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:31,000
explore opportunities for

442
00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:33,000
transitioning to organic methods

443
00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:34,000
of the weed control

444
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:37,000
-. We,?

445
00:20:37,000 --> 00:20:38,000
-.

446
00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:39,000
>> Thank you. I would add about

447
00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:42,000
the tree planting, the contract

448
00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:45,000
20.4 is to replace the -- trees

449
00:20:45,000 --> 00:20:47,000
that were taken down after the

450
00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:49,000
ice storm of last year and this

451
00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:52,000
contract is going to be paid

452
00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:55,000
back by the agglomeration under

453
00:20:55,000 --> 00:20:57,000
the security civil rules of the

454
00:20:57,000 --> 00:21:00,060
government, due to this ice

455
00:21:00,060 --> 00:21:01,060
storm that we had. Also, I would

456
00:21:01,060 --> 00:21:04,060
like to mention that since 2012

457
00:21:04,060 --> 00:21:06,060
-- we've been doubling the

458
00:21:06,060 --> 00:21:08,060
amount of trees that were

459
00:21:08,060 --> 00:21:09,060
planting previous to those

460
00:21:09,060 --> 00:21:13,060
years. And also, we have an

461
00:21:13,060 --> 00:21:15,060
agreement with -- two encourage

462
00:21:15,060 --> 00:21:19,060
residents to plant trees at

463
00:21:19,060 --> 00:21:22,060
advantageous costs because we do

464
00:21:22,060 --> 00:21:23,060
subsidized at a cost to plant a

465
00:21:23,060 --> 00:21:25,060
tree that was taken down or to

466
00:21:25,060 --> 00:21:29,060
plant a new tree.

467
00:21:29,060 --> 00:21:32,060
>> Thank you, Mr. Boileau. Next

468
00:21:32,060 --> 00:21:34,060
question was on the demolition

469
00:21:34,060 --> 00:21:38,060
of pipe 24 rock hill. Thank you

470
00:21:38,060 --> 00:21:41,060
for saying no to the demolition

471
00:21:41,060 --> 00:21:46,060
of 524 rock hill. That was voted

472
00:21:47,060 --> 00:21:49,060
at the committee, but it is on

473
00:21:49,060 --> 00:21:53,060
the agenda tonight, again, for

474
00:21:53,060 --> 00:21:55,060
the Council to determine whether

475
00:21:55,060 --> 00:21:58,060
the demolition will not go on or

476
00:21:58,060 --> 00:22:02,020
will be accepted. So, when it's

477
00:22:02,020 --> 00:22:04,020
not saying no to the demolition

478
00:22:04,020 --> 00:22:07,020
at this point. The homeowner had

479
00:22:07,020 --> 00:22:08,020
allegedly deliberately poked

480
00:22:08,020 --> 00:22:10,020
holes in the roof, so they could

481
00:22:10,020 --> 00:22:14,020
claim the house was damaged. I

482
00:22:14,020 --> 00:22:15,020
looked at the front and back of

483
00:22:15,020 --> 00:22:17,020
the house close up and it looks

484
00:22:17,020 --> 00:22:19,020
perfectly salvageable. If it is

485
00:22:19,020 --> 00:22:21,020
for sale, I would love to buy

486
00:22:21,020 --> 00:22:23,020
it. If I could somehow afford

487
00:22:23,020 --> 00:22:26,020
it. It is across from my

488
00:22:26,020 --> 00:22:29,020
cousin's house and I love 524

489
00:22:29,020 --> 00:22:31,020
rock hill. It is a lovely,

490
00:22:31,020 --> 00:22:33,020
little house with a beautiful

491
00:22:33,020 --> 00:22:34,020
backyard and a nice shed that

492
00:22:34,020 --> 00:22:37,020
could be made into an art

493
00:22:37,020 --> 00:22:39,020
studio. Tearing it down would be

494
00:22:39,020 --> 00:22:40,020
very disruptive to their lives

495
00:22:40,020 --> 00:22:44,020
and to my life, respectfully. I

496
00:22:44,020 --> 00:22:45,020
go over to their place all the

497
00:22:45,020 --> 00:22:46,020
time. Please keep the property

498
00:22:46,020 --> 00:22:49,020
intact. Also 74 Devin seems to

499
00:22:49,020 --> 00:22:51,020
have a lot of trees and seems to

500
00:22:51,020 --> 00:22:54,020
have we building on it already.

501
00:22:54,020 --> 00:22:55,020
Please preserve buildings and

502
00:22:55,020 --> 00:22:56,020
trees on all the properties as

503
00:22:56,020 --> 00:22:59,020
much as possible. So, Madam

504
00:22:59,020 --> 00:23:01,080
Corrado, I want to thank you for

505
00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:04,080
your comments regarding the

506
00:23:04,080 --> 00:23:05,080
demolition and regarding the

507
00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:10,080
trees at 74 common, Devin last

508
00:23:11,080 --> 00:23:16,080
question is on. Rodenticide.

509
00:23:16,080 --> 00:23:17,080
Madam Colorado makes comments

510
00:23:17,080 --> 00:23:20,080
and suggestions regarding

511
00:23:20,080 --> 00:23:21,080
rodenticide use in Beaconsfield.

512
00:23:21,080 --> 00:23:24,080
I will not read all the comments

513
00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:27,080
and the preamble, but I can

514
00:23:27,080 --> 00:23:28,080
assure you, Madam Corrado, that

515
00:23:28,080 --> 00:23:30,080
we will transfer your comments

516
00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:33,080
to the environmental inspection

517
00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:37,080
of public works. The next

518
00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:41,080
question is from Zachary P

519
00:23:41,080 --> 00:23:45,080
travesty of Olympic and subject

520
00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:50,080
is the jetty rehab. There are

521
00:23:51,080 --> 00:23:55,080
several questions with regard to

522
00:23:56,080 --> 00:24:00,040
the jet he rehab and I will ask

523
00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:01,040
Mr. Boileau to perhaps go circle

524
00:24:01,040 --> 00:24:05,040
all the questions and the

525
00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:06,040
answers as well.

526
00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:07,040
>> -- so, the question was, why

527
00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:09,040
was this not included in the

528
00:24:09,040 --> 00:24:10,040
three-year capital program if it

529
00:24:10,040 --> 00:24:14,040
is included -- why was this the

530
00:24:14,040 --> 00:24:16,040
case? It speaks to the need to

531
00:24:16,040 --> 00:24:17,040
stop bundling things together

532
00:24:17,040 --> 00:24:19,040
and continuing to refuse to put

533
00:24:19,040 --> 00:24:20,040
line item specific in the

534
00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:22,040
three-year plans that showed for

535
00:24:22,040 --> 00:24:24,040
public use. If this project was

536
00:24:24,040 --> 00:24:25,040
not included, it represents

537
00:24:25,040 --> 00:24:29,040
pressure to capital plan --

538
00:24:29,040 --> 00:24:31,040
reductions elsewhere to balance

539
00:24:31,040 --> 00:24:35,040
the pressure. So, it's not worth

540
00:24:35,040 --> 00:24:36,040
imagining and yes, it was not

541
00:24:36,040 --> 00:24:38,040
included in the three-year

542
00:24:38,040 --> 00:24:41,040
capital plan. It was a project

543
00:24:41,040 --> 00:24:44,040
that was carried over from 2023,

544
00:24:44,040 --> 00:24:47,040
we but I agree, it could've been

545
00:24:47,040 --> 00:24:49,040
presented as so that there was

546
00:24:49,040 --> 00:24:52,040
this project that we would come

547
00:24:52,040 --> 00:24:56,040
through for 2023. Which was not

548
00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:59,040
the case, but point taken. So,

549
00:24:59,040 --> 00:25:01,000
we it is the same for a few

550
00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:02,000
other projects. I'm thinking of

551
00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:04,000
the arena that it's coming soon.

552
00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:06,000
But for the jetty, we're also

553
00:25:06,000 --> 00:25:07,000
hoping to receive a confirmation

554
00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:09,000
of 1 million dollar grant from

555
00:25:09,000 --> 00:25:11,000
Infrastructure Canada. We are

556
00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:12,000
still waiting after eight months

557
00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:16,000
of the requests, so there is

558
00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:19,000
also the -- guarantees the price

559
00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:22,000
of the bids. The bids were open

560
00:25:22,000 --> 00:25:24,000
November 1st and so, the

561
00:25:24,000 --> 00:25:27,000
guarantees for the prices in the

562
00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:28,000
bids processor ending this week,

563
00:25:28,000 --> 00:25:30,000
so this is the latest date that

564
00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:33,000
Council meets that we can award

565
00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:34,000
this contract. The question to

566
00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:36,000
was, how required or critical is

567
00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:38,000
this work? How much of this is

568
00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:39,000
from a safety structural

569
00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:41,000
perspective or desire to improve

570
00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:42,000
cosmetics? Why is so important

571
00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:45,000
and why now? Can we not wait

572
00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:46,000
until government grant money is

573
00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:48,000
confirmed? A jetty

574
00:25:48,000 --> 00:25:50,000
rehabilitation is mutually

575
00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:51,000
exclusive from any building in

576
00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:52,000
the park. These are separate

577
00:25:52,000 --> 00:25:54,000
projects and should be treated

578
00:25:54,000 --> 00:25:56,000
accordingly. Yes, they are

579
00:25:56,000 --> 00:25:57,000
separated and we treat them

580
00:25:57,000 --> 00:25:59,000
differently. You are right when

581
00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:01,060
you say that is not directly

582
00:26:01,060 --> 00:26:04,060
related to imagine project. We

583
00:26:04,060 --> 00:26:05,060
have work with the minister of

584
00:26:05,060 --> 00:26:06,060
the environment for the last at

585
00:26:06,060 --> 00:26:08,060
least the last five years to

586
00:26:08,060 --> 00:26:10,060
obtain this see a certificate of

587
00:26:10,060 --> 00:26:12,060
authorization to fix the jetty

588
00:26:12,060 --> 00:26:15,060
that's becoming more and more

589
00:26:15,060 --> 00:26:17,060
dangerous. We've already

590
00:26:17,060 --> 00:26:18,060
installed the one section of the

591
00:26:18,060 --> 00:26:19,060
embankment and -- safety

592
00:26:19,060 --> 00:26:22,060
reasons. This is a ends in 2025,

593
00:26:22,060 --> 00:26:24,060
therefore, the work has and

594
00:26:24,060 --> 00:26:27,060
could only be performed during a

595
00:26:27,060 --> 00:26:29,060
very specific time of the year,

596
00:26:29,060 --> 00:26:32,060
which is late August to the end

597
00:26:32,060 --> 00:26:33,060
of October and depends on the

598
00:26:33,060 --> 00:26:35,060
level of the water, movements of

599
00:26:35,060 --> 00:26:37,060
the fish, and bird migration.

600
00:26:37,060 --> 00:26:39,060
That's when we work with those

601
00:26:39,060 --> 00:26:40,060
biologists, we have to look

602
00:26:40,060 --> 00:26:43,060
after these things and it's huge

603
00:26:43,060 --> 00:26:45,060
constraints, of course. Question

604
00:26:45,060 --> 00:26:47,060
three, what alternatives have

605
00:26:47,060 --> 00:26:48,060
been explored to this week,

606
00:26:48,060 --> 00:26:50,060
reduce score, functional repair

607
00:26:50,060 --> 00:26:51,060
replacement only versus

608
00:26:51,060 --> 00:26:54,060
beautification. -- so, we have

609
00:26:54,060 --> 00:26:56,060
considered to removal of the

610
00:26:56,060 --> 00:26:57,060
jetty because we cannot leave it

611
00:26:57,060 --> 00:27:02,020
as is. So, the cost estimated is

612
00:27:03,020 --> 00:27:05,020
about 1.8 million of taking the

613
00:27:05,020 --> 00:27:08,020
jetty out of the water, in

614
00:27:08,020 --> 00:27:10,020
comparison to fix it cost as

615
00:27:10,020 --> 00:27:11,020
presented to the Council tonight

616
00:27:11,020 --> 00:27:14,020
and it could only be done after

617
00:27:14,020 --> 00:27:16,020
another lengthy process of

618
00:27:16,020 --> 00:27:19,020
obtaining a CA, so if we decide

619
00:27:19,020 --> 00:27:20,020
we don't want to fix the jetty,

620
00:27:20,020 --> 00:27:21,020
we have to remove it, we will

621
00:27:21,020 --> 00:27:24,020
have another five, six, seven

622
00:27:24,020 --> 00:27:25,020
years, I don't know, with the

623
00:27:25,020 --> 00:27:26,020
Ministry of the Environment. I

624
00:27:26,020 --> 00:27:29,020
have no control on that but we

625
00:27:29,020 --> 00:27:31,020
have to reset -- redo plans and

626
00:27:31,020 --> 00:27:34,020
specks, go to their government,

627
00:27:34,020 --> 00:27:35,020
-- remove that and it's going to

628
00:27:35,020 --> 00:27:37,020
take more years, of course. It's

629
00:27:37,020 --> 00:27:40,020
going to be -- 1.8 million in

630
00:27:40,020 --> 00:27:42,020
that time and in that case, we

631
00:27:42,020 --> 00:27:43,020
could think that the jetty would

632
00:27:43,020 --> 00:27:46,020
have to be condemned totally or

633
00:27:46,020 --> 00:27:49,020
partially for safety reasons.

634
00:27:49,020 --> 00:27:54,020
>> Thank you, Mr. Boileau. Last

635
00:27:54,020 --> 00:27:59,020
written question we've received

636
00:28:00,080 --> 00:28:01,080
was from Caroline Malcolm,

637
00:28:01,080 --> 00:28:02,080
Montrose. The subject is speed

638
00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:03,080
once at Sherbrooke and Monroe's

639
00:28:03,080 --> 00:28:05,080
intersection. Again, as I watch

640
00:28:05,080 --> 00:28:07,080
people drive right through stop

641
00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:09,080
signs at this intersection,

642
00:28:09,080 --> 00:28:12,080
regularly, I ask for speed

643
00:28:12,080 --> 00:28:14,080
bumps. It's dangerous for the

644
00:28:14,080 --> 00:28:16,080
children and adults. Speed bumps

645
00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:19,080
work. I have to commend the fact

646
00:28:19,080 --> 00:28:22,080
that when I notified authorities

647
00:28:22,080 --> 00:28:23,080
at one of the stop signs was

648
00:28:23,080 --> 00:28:26,080
damaged by the snow clearing

649
00:28:26,080 --> 00:28:28,080
activities at this intersection

650
00:28:28,080 --> 00:28:30,080
this past winter, the resolution

651
00:28:30,080 --> 00:28:33,080
was within hours. Why can this

652
00:28:33,080 --> 00:28:36,080
not happen with a speed bumps?

653
00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:38,080
What more do we need to study as

654
00:28:38,080 --> 00:28:40,080
we all know, speeding is an

655
00:28:40,080 --> 00:28:43,080
issue. I would think that speed

656
00:28:43,080 --> 00:28:44,080
bumps are a low cost solution

657
00:28:44,080 --> 00:28:46,080
that could be implemented in a

658
00:28:46,080 --> 00:28:49,080
couple of weeks, not months or

659
00:28:49,080 --> 00:28:51,080
years. And speaking of issues

660
00:28:51,080 --> 00:28:53,080
that take too long to resolve, I

661
00:28:53,080 --> 00:28:55,080
would hope that the tax

662
00:28:55,080 --> 00:28:56,080
situation with the City of

663
00:28:56,080 --> 00:29:00,040
Montréal could be finally

664
00:29:00,040 --> 00:29:02,040
resolved in 2024, as well as

665
00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:04,040
improved action from

666
00:29:04,040 --> 00:29:05,040
Hydro-Québec reducing the number

667
00:29:05,040 --> 00:29:07,040
of electrical outage we are

668
00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:09,040
experiencing. We could start

669
00:29:09,040 --> 00:29:11,040
with buying the wires, pruning

670
00:29:11,040 --> 00:29:14,040
tree branches, and enhanced the

671
00:29:14,040 --> 00:29:17,040
network. Thanks in regards for

672
00:29:17,040 --> 00:29:21,040
your consideration. So, Madam

673
00:29:22,040 --> 00:29:24,040
Malcolm, your request regarding

674
00:29:24,040 --> 00:29:27,040
speed bumps was sent to the

675
00:29:27,040 --> 00:29:29,040
traffic advisory Committee last

676
00:29:29,040 --> 00:29:32,040
November. The first meeting

677
00:29:32,040 --> 00:29:34,040
since then will be held in

678
00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:36,040
April. Your requests will be

679
00:29:36,040 --> 00:29:39,040
studied and analyzed at the

680
00:29:39,040 --> 00:29:43,040
April meeting. With regard to

681
00:29:43,040 --> 00:29:46,040
Hydro-Québec, the city adopted a

682
00:29:46,040 --> 00:29:48,040
resolution last May to this

683
00:29:48,040 --> 00:29:51,040
effect and a meeting was held in

684
00:29:51,040 --> 00:29:53,040
July between the mayor and

685
00:29:53,040 --> 00:29:56,040
representatives of Hydro-Québec.

686
00:29:56,040 --> 00:29:57,040
Further discussions are planned

687
00:29:57,040 --> 00:30:02,000
with the administration. I agree

688
00:30:05,000 --> 00:30:08,000
that -- wires should be done. It

689
00:30:08,000 --> 00:30:13,000
has been my saying with hydro

690
00:30:14,000 --> 00:30:16,000
all along. In Beaconsfield,

691
00:30:16,000 --> 00:30:17,000
particularly because of the

692
00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:22,000
large tree canopy, it is an

693
00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:26,000
expensive proposition to realize

694
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:30,000
but I think it could be done in

695
00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:34,000
stages. Personally, I have so

696
00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:36,000
much confidence in Hydro-Québec

697
00:30:36,000 --> 00:30:39,000
that I have now, like many other

698
00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:44,000
residents, installed a

699
00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:49,000
generator. So, now that is the

700
00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:54,000
end of the written questions.

701
00:30:54,000 --> 00:30:59,000
Likely we can go to the floor

702
00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:01,060
Pour les gens qui sont ici dans

703
00:31:01,060 --> 00:31:04,060
le moment. Poser les questions.

704
00:31:04,060 --> 00:31:09,060
I would appreciate that the same

705
00:31:11,060 --> 00:31:16,060
questions, with Matt the same

706
00:31:17,060 --> 00:31:21,060
information, does not come back,

707
00:31:21,060 --> 00:31:23,060
so that you give everybody a

708
00:31:23,060 --> 00:31:27,060
chance to have questions if they

709
00:31:27,060 --> 00:31:32,060
are on various subjects. So,

710
00:31:33,060 --> 00:31:36,060
please, after a while, if I see

711
00:31:36,060 --> 00:31:37,060
that the same question is being

712
00:31:37,060 --> 00:31:40,060
asked, we will try to move on to

713
00:31:40,060 --> 00:31:42,060
other people that have other

714
00:31:42,060 --> 00:31:44,060
questions as well. So, here we

715
00:31:44,060 --> 00:31:49,060
go. Questions?

716
00:31:49,060 --> 00:31:52,060
>> Thank you, gentlemen. I'm

717
00:31:52,060 --> 00:31:53,060
here to ask you a question.

718
00:31:53,060 --> 00:31:55,060
>> Could you identify yourself?

719
00:31:55,060 --> 00:31:58,060
>> Oh, Jason Bolton. So, it's in

720
00:31:58,060 --> 00:32:00,020
regard to downplay the

721
00:32:00,020 --> 00:32:02,020
development. I think the first,

722
00:32:02,020 --> 00:32:04,020
I have a question, but my

723
00:32:04,020 --> 00:32:05,020
statement is, our community is

724
00:32:05,020 --> 00:32:07,020
not against the development of

725
00:32:07,020 --> 00:32:09,020
this project. This needs to be

726
00:32:09,020 --> 00:32:10,020
understood, but we are against

727
00:32:10,020 --> 00:32:12,020
it as it stands, and that's why

728
00:32:12,020 --> 00:32:13,020
we would like for you to vote no

729
00:32:13,020 --> 00:32:15,020
because of my understanding is,

730
00:32:15,020 --> 00:32:17,020
there is no opportunity to

731
00:32:17,020 --> 00:32:18,020
negotiate it. It's either yes or

732
00:32:18,020 --> 00:32:20,020
no and in order to do that, it

733
00:32:20,020 --> 00:32:22,020
would have to be a no. So,

734
00:32:22,020 --> 00:32:23,020
question to you with respect to

735
00:32:23,020 --> 00:32:26,020
this and not to rehash the same

736
00:32:26,020 --> 00:32:27,020
questions that have come forth

737
00:32:27,020 --> 00:32:31,020
to you guys, and ladies, is

738
00:32:31,020 --> 00:32:33,020
around the floor area ratio. So,

739
00:32:33,020 --> 00:32:35,020
I tried to do some homework to

740
00:32:35,020 --> 00:32:37,020
understand currently were on

741
00:32:37,020 --> 00:32:38,020
zero point and the request for

742
00:32:38,020 --> 00:32:41,020
the development 1.8. That sounds

743
00:32:41,020 --> 00:32:43,020
as 100 25% increase. I am not

744
00:32:43,020 --> 00:32:45,020
able to find any relevant

745
00:32:45,020 --> 00:32:47,020
example. I found examples, but

746
00:32:47,020 --> 00:32:51,020
no relevant example that shows

747
00:32:51,020 --> 00:32:54,020
125% increase. So, my question

748
00:32:54,020 --> 00:32:56,020
to everybody is, what have you

749
00:32:56,020 --> 00:32:58,020
used as an example when you're

750
00:32:58,020 --> 00:33:00,080
debating in your caucus to

751
00:33:00,080 --> 00:33:03,080
justify such an increase?

752
00:33:11,080 --> 00:33:12,080
Je n'ai pas l'information.

753
00:33:12,080 --> 00:33:13,080
>> I don't have the specific

754
00:33:13,080 --> 00:33:15,080
answer for that. I believe we

755
00:33:15,080 --> 00:33:17,080
did some studies in the

756
00:33:17,080 --> 00:33:21,080
department with our experts. Je

757
00:33:21,080 --> 00:33:23,080
ne sais pas, Mireille, si tu es

758
00:33:23,080 --> 00:33:24,080
capable à m'aider à répondre à

759
00:33:24,080 --> 00:33:25,080
we have -- cette question. Nous

760
00:33:25,080 --> 00:33:26,080
avons Mireille. Who's a division

761
00:33:26,080 --> 00:33:28,080
with the urban planning. We're

762
00:33:28,080 --> 00:33:29,080
very fortunate to have her with

763
00:33:29,080 --> 00:33:34,080
us tonight.

764
00:33:41,080 --> 00:33:42,080
-

765
00:33:42,080 --> 00:33:44,080
>> I will do it from here. There

766
00:33:44,080 --> 00:33:45,080
is no other projects like that

767
00:33:45,080 --> 00:33:47,080
in Beaconsfield, so the only one

768
00:33:47,080 --> 00:33:48,080
that exists, and that's

769
00:33:48,080 --> 00:33:49,080
permanent in the zoning bylaw,

770
00:33:49,080 --> 00:33:51,080
is the Artemis project on the

771
00:33:51,080 --> 00:33:55,080
corner of elm and Alvin. This

772
00:33:55,080 --> 00:33:59,080
one is at 1.6, but 1.6 is one

773
00:34:00,040 --> 00:34:03,040
per metre of the project. It is

774
00:34:03,040 --> 00:34:04,040
at 1.6 the building that's the

775
00:34:04,040 --> 00:34:06,040
right now, but at the end of the

776
00:34:06,040 --> 00:34:08,040
project, it's going to be 1.6.

777
00:34:08,040 --> 00:34:10,040
But the density is going to be

778
00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:13,040
way higher because per building,

779
00:34:13,040 --> 00:34:18,040
it's permitted to go all the way

780
00:34:18,040 --> 00:34:22,040
to 60 units. It's just different

781
00:34:22,040 --> 00:34:23,040
density per metres, but it would

782
00:34:23,040 --> 00:34:25,040
come to basically the same

783
00:34:25,040 --> 00:34:28,040
density at the end regarding the

784
00:34:28,040 --> 00:34:30,040
size of the lot that it's built

785
00:34:30,040 --> 00:34:31,040
on.

786
00:34:31,040 --> 00:34:32,040
>> So, why are we setting a

787
00:34:32,040 --> 00:34:34,040
precedent? Is this a follow-up

788
00:34:34,040 --> 00:34:35,040
question to that, because there

789
00:34:35,040 --> 00:34:37,040
is no other example in

790
00:34:37,040 --> 00:34:38,040
Beaconsfield, there is no other

791
00:34:38,040 --> 00:34:40,040
example in neighbouring boroughs

792
00:34:40,040 --> 00:34:42,040
either. So, this particular one,

793
00:34:42,040 --> 00:34:44,040
in that particular area, with

794
00:34:44,040 --> 00:34:46,040
that location and the residents,

795
00:34:46,040 --> 00:34:48,040
is quite a large increase with

796
00:34:48,040 --> 00:34:49,040
respect to where it's being put.

797
00:34:49,040 --> 00:34:51,040
So my only question is, why

798
00:34:51,040 --> 00:34:54,040
can't the project move forward

799
00:34:54,040 --> 00:34:56,040
with a reasonable rate rather

800
00:34:56,040 --> 00:34:59,040
than such a drastic one? But

801
00:34:59,040 --> 00:35:02,000
this is for everybody, please.

802
00:35:02,000 --> 00:35:04,000
>> I think you'll hear more

803
00:35:04,000 --> 00:35:06,000
about, because there will be a

804
00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:08,000
-- leader on this project. But

805
00:35:08,000 --> 00:35:13,000
we are voting now -- Projets

806
00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:17,000
particuliers de construction, de

807
00:35:17,000 --> 00:35:18,000
modification ou d'occupation

808
00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:23,000
d'un immeuble. The -- has been

809
00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:29,000
reviewed by the sea seat you and

810
00:35:30,000 --> 00:35:31,000
it's recommended, the

811
00:35:31,000 --> 00:35:33,000
recommendation of the CCU is to

812
00:35:33,000 --> 00:35:36,000
go ahead and, you know, it's one

813
00:35:43,000 --> 00:35:45,000
of the few fraudulence of

814
00:35:45,000 --> 00:35:46,000
Beaconsfield, so obviously there

815
00:35:46,000 --> 00:35:49,000
will be exceptions to this one

816
00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:51,000
from any other. We can't compare

817
00:35:51,000 --> 00:35:52,000
ourselves with some of the other

818
00:35:52,000 --> 00:35:57,000
said he's. Cities.

819
00:36:01,060 --> 00:36:03,060
>> Hi, good evening, my name is

820
00:36:03,060 --> 00:36:06,060
Amanda. I'm the director of --

821
00:36:06,060 --> 00:36:10,060
daycare center located right

822
00:36:10,060 --> 00:36:12,060
beside elm plaza. I want to take

823
00:36:12,060 --> 00:36:13,060
a moment to thank you for taking

824
00:36:13,060 --> 00:36:14,060
the time to hear what I have to

825
00:36:14,060 --> 00:36:16,060
say because I know

826
00:36:16,060 --> 00:36:18,060
wholeheartedly how important my

827
00:36:18,060 --> 00:36:19,060
role as an advocate for young

828
00:36:19,060 --> 00:36:21,060
children, especially in regards

829
00:36:21,060 --> 00:36:25,060
to their well-being and health.

830
00:36:25,060 --> 00:36:28,060
I've signed you guys countless

831
00:36:28,060 --> 00:36:29,060
informations and research

832
00:36:29,060 --> 00:36:32,060
regarding the effects on young

833
00:36:32,060 --> 00:36:34,060
children's developing systems

834
00:36:34,060 --> 00:36:36,060
and how the brain, nervous

835
00:36:36,060 --> 00:36:37,060
system, and respiratory system

836
00:36:37,060 --> 00:36:39,060
are not fully developed until

837
00:36:39,060 --> 00:36:41,060
the age of six. Young children

838
00:36:41,060 --> 00:36:43,060
at our daycare centre are there

839
00:36:43,060 --> 00:36:46,060
from, you know, six months old

840
00:36:46,060 --> 00:36:47,060
until five and a half years old

841
00:36:47,060 --> 00:36:48,060
sometimes. So, they will spend

842
00:36:48,060 --> 00:36:51,060
on average four or five of those

843
00:36:51,060 --> 00:36:52,060
years because the project is

844
00:36:52,060 --> 00:36:55,060
expected to last at least five

845
00:36:55,060 --> 00:37:00,020
years. In a zone that can be

846
00:37:01,020 --> 00:37:02,020
absolutely detrimental to their

847
00:37:02,020 --> 00:37:05,020
health. So, some people will

848
00:37:05,020 --> 00:37:07,020
only ever know that further

849
00:37:07,020 --> 00:37:08,020
daycare experience where they

850
00:37:08,020 --> 00:37:09,020
spend more than eight hours

851
00:37:09,020 --> 00:37:13,020
every day. Under no circumstance

852
00:37:13,020 --> 00:37:14,020
should the health of young

853
00:37:14,020 --> 00:37:16,020
children be risked to ensure

854
00:37:16,020 --> 00:37:18,020
that a project for a developer

855
00:37:18,020 --> 00:37:22,020
is profitable. My question to

856
00:37:22,020 --> 00:37:24,020
you is, has the city looked at

857
00:37:24,020 --> 00:37:25,020
every safety and construction

858
00:37:25,020 --> 00:37:27,020
code in relation to young

859
00:37:27,020 --> 00:37:29,020
children, including those

860
00:37:29,020 --> 00:37:30,020
considered vulnerable or with

861
00:37:30,020 --> 00:37:32,020
disabilities? Because we do have

862
00:37:32,020 --> 00:37:33,020
children with disabilities that

863
00:37:33,020 --> 00:37:34,020
are extremely sensitive to

864
00:37:34,020 --> 00:37:39,020
noise, vibration, to all of

865
00:37:40,020 --> 00:37:44,020
that. To ensure that the

866
00:37:44,020 --> 00:37:45,020
children will not be compromised

867
00:37:45,020 --> 00:37:48,020
in any way. If you have, what

868
00:37:48,020 --> 00:37:50,020
are they? Because I haven't

869
00:37:50,020 --> 00:37:52,020
heard or seen anything discussed

870
00:37:52,020 --> 00:37:55,020
about it. And if it hasn't been

871
00:37:55,020 --> 00:37:57,020
looked at, how can you possibly

872
00:37:57,020 --> 00:37:59,020
consider passing a project

873
00:37:59,020 --> 00:38:02,080
without any regard for this? Is

874
00:38:02,080 --> 00:38:04,080
the city ready to suffer the

875
00:38:04,080 --> 00:38:06,080
consequences, air and noise

876
00:38:06,080 --> 00:38:08,080
pollution, and construction

877
00:38:08,080 --> 00:38:10,080
sites can have on the developing

878
00:38:10,080 --> 00:38:12,080
systems of young children during

879
00:38:12,080 --> 00:38:14,080
their most fragile years? And

880
00:38:14,080 --> 00:38:16,080
these are lifelong consequences

881
00:38:16,080 --> 00:38:18,080
we are talking about. There are

882
00:38:18,080 --> 00:38:19,080
not just, you know, immediate,

883
00:38:19,080 --> 00:38:21,080
one or two years and then

884
00:38:21,080 --> 00:38:22,080
everything is good. They can be

885
00:38:22,080 --> 00:38:25,080
lifelong health consequences for

886
00:38:25,080 --> 00:38:28,080
this. So, have they've been

887
00:38:28,080 --> 00:38:29,080
discussed? And have you consider

888
00:38:29,080 --> 00:38:30,080
them? If so, you know, what is

889
00:38:30,080 --> 00:38:34,080
it?

890
00:38:34,080 --> 00:38:36,080
>> Thank you. For your question,

891
00:38:36,080 --> 00:38:37,080
I have to tell you that the

892
00:38:37,080 --> 00:38:40,080
safety and health of children

893
00:38:40,080 --> 00:38:43,080
are as important as those of all

894
00:38:43,080 --> 00:38:46,080
road users. We prioritize all

895
00:38:46,080 --> 00:38:48,080
active and passive safety

896
00:38:48,080 --> 00:38:52,080
measures to provide a safe

897
00:38:52,080 --> 00:38:54,080
environment for all road users,

898
00:38:54,080 --> 00:38:56,080
be they children, young people,

899
00:38:56,080 --> 00:39:00,040
families, or senior citizens. We

900
00:39:00,040 --> 00:39:03,040
have always acted and continue

901
00:39:03,040 --> 00:39:06,040
to active vigilantly and

902
00:39:06,040 --> 00:39:08,040
promptly to ensure road safety

903
00:39:08,040 --> 00:39:10,040
in Beaconsfield, even in the

904
00:39:10,040 --> 00:39:13,040
context of some of our schools

905
00:39:13,040 --> 00:39:15,040
being located close to arterial

906
00:39:15,040 --> 00:39:19,040
roads, particularly Beaconsfield

907
00:39:19,040 --> 00:39:20,040
boulevard, beau repair drive,

908
00:39:20,040 --> 00:39:24,040
and elm avenue. In 2022, alone,

909
00:39:24,040 --> 00:39:26,040
the city of Beaconsfield spent

910
00:39:26,040 --> 00:39:30,040
more than $400,000 on

911
00:39:30,040 --> 00:39:32,040
improvements and traffic calming

912
00:39:32,040 --> 00:39:36,040
measures near schools and parks.

913
00:39:36,040 --> 00:39:39,040
It's also worth noting that

914
00:39:39,040 --> 00:39:42,040
recent construction projects at

915
00:39:42,040 --> 00:39:44,040
Christmas Park and St. ramie

916
00:39:44,040 --> 00:39:46,040
schools did not result in any

917
00:39:46,040 --> 00:39:48,040
health impacts on the students

918
00:39:48,040 --> 00:39:51,040
or children playing in adjacent

919
00:39:51,040 --> 00:39:55,040
parks. When all cases, and other

920
00:39:55,040 --> 00:39:56,040
all circumstances, our

921
00:39:56,040 --> 00:39:57,040
priorities are the same toward

922
00:39:57,040 --> 00:39:59,040
pedestrians, cyclists, and

923
00:39:59,040 --> 00:40:01,000
motorists. It's never about

924
00:40:01,000 --> 00:40:03,000
compromise, it's always about

925
00:40:03,000 --> 00:40:05,000
safety and you can count on the

926
00:40:05,000 --> 00:40:06,000
whole administration of the

927
00:40:06,000 --> 00:40:08,000
City, your councillors, and

928
00:40:08,000 --> 00:40:10,000
myself, to keep you safe.

929
00:40:10,000 --> 00:40:12,000
>> I can appreciate that. I just

930
00:40:12,000 --> 00:40:13,000
want to point out that, you

931
00:40:13,000 --> 00:40:14,000
know, the majority of what you

932
00:40:14,000 --> 00:40:16,000
said to me right now is about

933
00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:17,000
road safety and that's, you

934
00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:19,000
know, very little of what I

935
00:40:19,000 --> 00:40:21,000
asked. My question in terms of,

936
00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:22,000
you know, --

937
00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:23,000
>> I think I answered your

938
00:40:23,000 --> 00:40:25,000
questions, thank you.

939
00:40:25,000 --> 00:40:28,000
>> No --

940
00:40:28,000 --> 00:40:32,000
>> That's my answer. That's my

941
00:40:32,000 --> 00:40:36,000
answer. Thank you.

942
00:40:36,000 --> 00:40:38,000
>> That's quite frustrating.

943
00:40:38,000 --> 00:40:42,000
>> Thank you.

944
00:40:43,000 --> 00:40:47,000
>> Hi, my name is -- I'm glad

945
00:40:48,000 --> 00:40:50,000
you complemented Brian Mulroney.

946
00:40:50,000 --> 00:40:51,000
I worked with by Brian one

947
00:40:51,000 --> 00:40:52,000
really. This is a health

948
00:40:52,000 --> 00:40:55,000
question. Infectious diseases

949
00:40:55,000 --> 00:40:57,000
are spreading. I worked with

950
00:40:57,000 --> 00:40:59,000
Bryan when I was an

951
00:40:59,000 --> 00:41:00,060
environmental engineer, he was

952
00:41:00,060 --> 00:41:01,060
working for iron work company.

953
00:41:01,060 --> 00:41:03,060
He was very conscious of that,

954
00:41:03,060 --> 00:41:06,060
it was -- he was good at that.

955
00:41:06,060 --> 00:41:08,060
And right now, there is a big,

956
00:41:08,060 --> 00:41:11,060
big epidemic globally, whooping

957
00:41:11,060 --> 00:41:14,060
cough, tuberculosis, all

958
00:41:14,060 --> 00:41:17,060
diseases that I remember when I

959
00:41:17,060 --> 00:41:18,060
was a young guy and said, I'm

960
00:41:18,060 --> 00:41:19,060
not going to get them. But

961
00:41:19,060 --> 00:41:22,060
people are getting older and

962
00:41:22,060 --> 00:41:23,060
this is going to be a calamity.

963
00:41:23,060 --> 00:41:26,060
Now, I didn't see anything

964
00:41:26,060 --> 00:41:28,060
Beaconsfield put in writing we

965
00:41:28,060 --> 00:41:30,060
are going to improve the doctors

966
00:41:30,060 --> 00:41:31,060
or I'm not saying that you don't

967
00:41:31,060 --> 00:41:32,060
have good doctors.

968
00:41:32,060 --> 00:41:34,060
>> What is your question?

969
00:41:34,060 --> 00:41:35,060
>> The question is what the heck

970
00:41:35,060 --> 00:41:36,060
are you doing about telling the

971
00:41:36,060 --> 00:41:37,060
people that we're having an

972
00:41:37,060 --> 00:41:38,060
epidemic and you're doing

973
00:41:38,060 --> 00:41:40,060
nothing about it?

974
00:41:40,060 --> 00:41:41,060
>> I think it's a provincial

975
00:41:41,060 --> 00:41:44,060
health issue and it is up to --

976
00:41:44,060 --> 00:41:45,060
>> So, we are part of the

977
00:41:45,060 --> 00:41:46,060
province.

978
00:41:46,060 --> 00:41:50,060
>> Then talk to your am and a,

979
00:41:50,060 --> 00:41:53,060
not to us.

980
00:41:53,060 --> 00:41:55,060
>> Can you not put in your --

981
00:41:55,060 --> 00:41:57,060
>> Speak to your am and a

982
00:41:57,060 --> 00:42:00,020
because it is a health issue.

983
00:42:00,020 --> 00:42:03,020
>> You publish this thing

984
00:42:03,020 --> 00:42:04,020
everywhere.

985
00:42:04,020 --> 00:42:05,020
>> Talk to your MNA.

986
00:42:05,020 --> 00:42:07,020
>> Mister Mayor, we did publish

987
00:42:07,020 --> 00:42:08,020
it last Friday around five PM

988
00:42:08,020 --> 00:42:11,020
because we have received --

989
00:42:11,020 --> 00:42:12,020
afternoon a notification from

990
00:42:12,020 --> 00:42:15,020
the Ministry that we are asking

991
00:42:15,020 --> 00:42:17,020
us to defuse a message to as

992
00:42:17,020 --> 00:42:20,020
many as possible, so we did --

993
00:42:20,020 --> 00:42:21,020
>> It's in writing?

994
00:42:21,020 --> 00:42:23,020
>> It's in writing if you read

995
00:42:23,020 --> 00:42:27,020
your social media network from

996
00:42:27,020 --> 00:42:29,020
the city, -- or Facebook, or

997
00:42:29,020 --> 00:42:32,020
other messages that we send out.

998
00:42:32,020 --> 00:42:34,020
>> Well, there are old folks who

999
00:42:34,020 --> 00:42:35,020
would appreciate that, thanks.

1000
00:42:35,020 --> 00:42:38,020
>> Thank you.

1001
00:42:46,020 --> 00:42:48,020
>> Good evening, everyone. My

1002
00:42:48,020 --> 00:42:49,020
name is David world, I'm a

1003
00:42:49,020 --> 00:42:51,020
resident of fairway Drive in

1004
00:42:51,020 --> 00:42:53,020
Beaconsfield. My question is

1005
00:42:53,020 --> 00:42:57,020
kind of a twofold question and

1006
00:42:57,020 --> 00:42:59,020
it relies, it's based a little

1007
00:42:59,020 --> 00:43:03,080
bit on the daycare situation.

1008
00:43:03,080 --> 00:43:04,080
Part of that first question is,

1009
00:43:04,080 --> 00:43:06,080
and I noticed that we've

1010
00:43:06,080 --> 00:43:08,080
allocated or there is an

1011
00:43:08,080 --> 00:43:11,080
allocation of a five-year term

1012
00:43:11,080 --> 00:43:13,080
in which to bring this proposal

1013
00:43:13,080 --> 00:43:18,080
or this building of 275 elm to

1014
00:43:21,080 --> 00:43:24,080
its rightful completion. With

1015
00:43:24,080 --> 00:43:27,080
five year period is absolutely

1016
00:43:27,080 --> 00:43:29,080
absurd. If you look at buildings

1017
00:43:29,080 --> 00:43:30,080
being built, I mean, first of

1018
00:43:30,080 --> 00:43:33,080
all, I believe there is an

1019
00:43:33,080 --> 00:43:36,080
18-month sort of cap on these

1020
00:43:36,080 --> 00:43:38,080
buildings being built. If we

1021
00:43:38,080 --> 00:43:41,080
look at the Champlain Bridge, it

1022
00:43:41,080 --> 00:43:44,080
took about a year and a half.

1023
00:43:44,080 --> 00:43:46,080
Why would a project as small as

1024
00:43:46,080 --> 00:43:49,080
275 get a five-year term? That's

1025
00:43:49,080 --> 00:43:52,080
the first question. And in that

1026
00:43:52,080 --> 00:43:54,080
five-year term, the daycare is

1027
00:43:54,080 --> 00:43:56,080
going to suffer yet even

1028
00:43:56,080 --> 00:44:01,040
further. If it was controlled in

1029
00:44:01,040 --> 00:44:03,040
an 18-month fashion, measures

1030
00:44:03,040 --> 00:44:06,040
could be put in place to protect

1031
00:44:06,040 --> 00:44:08,040
the kids and the surrounding

1032
00:44:08,040 --> 00:44:12,040
area. Over a five-year term, I

1033
00:44:12,040 --> 00:44:15,040
can't even imagine what the

1034
00:44:15,040 --> 00:44:19,040
consequences are. We

1035
00:44:20,040 --> 00:44:23,040
>> I will ask me Ray if she

1036
00:44:23,040 --> 00:44:28,040
could perhaps explain the whole

1037
00:44:28,040 --> 00:44:32,040
process that will eventually

1038
00:44:32,040 --> 00:44:36,040
complete the project and how

1039
00:44:36,040 --> 00:44:39,040
complicated, how complex it is.

1040
00:44:39,040 --> 00:44:40,040
>> Yes, first of all, the

1041
00:44:40,040 --> 00:44:44,040
project is that they propose is

1042
00:44:44,040 --> 00:44:47,040
three phases. So, the first

1043
00:44:47,040 --> 00:44:49,040
building that is on elm would be

1044
00:44:49,040 --> 00:44:52,040
two phases. Each permit that we

1045
00:44:52,040 --> 00:44:54,040
issue at the City can be

1046
00:44:54,040 --> 00:44:57,040
realized, completed in 12 months

1047
00:44:57,040 --> 00:44:59,040
with an extension of six months,

1048
00:44:59,040 --> 00:45:01,000
so 18 months. So, that's what

1049
00:45:01,000 --> 00:45:04,000
the 18 month is four in the --

1050
00:45:04,000 --> 00:45:06,000
bylaw. That's the first thing,

1051
00:45:06,000 --> 00:45:10,000
so adding all these three

1052
00:45:11,000 --> 00:45:13,000
permits, the five years, that's

1053
00:45:13,000 --> 00:45:15,000
why it's proposed, to make sure

1054
00:45:15,000 --> 00:45:17,000
that they fit in the five years.

1055
00:45:17,000 --> 00:45:21,000
And they have time to complete

1056
00:45:21,000 --> 00:45:23,000
the project. If that condition

1057
00:45:23,000 --> 00:45:25,000
would not be in the resolution,

1058
00:45:25,000 --> 00:45:30,000
that would mean that the sky

1059
00:45:30,000 --> 00:45:32,000
will be could be valid as long

1060
00:45:32,000 --> 00:45:35,000
as a resolution exists. So, if

1061
00:45:35,000 --> 00:45:37,000
that five-year where there is no

1062
00:45:37,000 --> 00:45:39,000
condition regarding delays of

1063
00:45:39,000 --> 00:45:40,000
the completion of the project,

1064
00:45:40,000 --> 00:45:43,000
then that would mean that in

1065
00:45:43,000 --> 00:45:44,000
2030, the promoter could come

1066
00:45:44,000 --> 00:45:46,000
and ask for a permit. And in the

1067
00:45:46,000 --> 00:45:49,000
meantime, there could be nothing

1068
00:45:49,000 --> 00:45:53,000
done with that plaza elm. So,

1069
00:45:53,000 --> 00:45:56,000
that's why it was suggested by

1070
00:45:56,000 --> 00:45:57,000
sea see you and the urban

1071
00:45:57,000 --> 00:45:58,000
planning department to council

1072
00:45:58,000 --> 00:46:01,060
to add that condition to the

1073
00:46:01,060 --> 00:46:03,060
project. So, it makes sure that

1074
00:46:03,060 --> 00:46:05,060
yes, it's going to be five

1075
00:46:05,060 --> 00:46:06,060
years. It can't seem quite long,

1076
00:46:06,060 --> 00:46:09,060
but at the same time, it

1077
00:46:09,060 --> 00:46:11,060
segments in time when that

1078
00:46:11,060 --> 00:46:12,060
project can be done. After that

1079
00:46:12,060 --> 00:46:14,060
five years, what happens? That

1080
00:46:14,060 --> 00:46:16,060
resolution is no longer valid,

1081
00:46:16,060 --> 00:46:17,060
so the promoter has to do this

1082
00:46:17,060 --> 00:46:20,060
all over again.

1083
00:46:20,060 --> 00:46:22,060
>> That is fair, it's a fair

1084
00:46:22,060 --> 00:46:24,060
response. But I think it's more

1085
00:46:24,060 --> 00:46:29,060
of a work around that allows a

1086
00:46:29,060 --> 00:46:33,060
developer to work a project

1087
00:46:33,060 --> 00:46:35,060
longer by working little

1088
00:46:35,060 --> 00:46:37,060
segments of the same parking

1089
00:46:37,060 --> 00:46:38,060
lot.

1090
00:46:38,060 --> 00:46:40,060
>> There is an important element

1091
00:46:40,060 --> 00:46:44,060
on that, it's that right now,

1092
00:46:45,060 --> 00:46:48,060
there's -- that goes through the

1093
00:46:48,060 --> 00:46:52,060
lot that needs to be placed in

1094
00:46:52,060 --> 00:46:53,060
the back of the lot and this is

1095
00:46:53,060 --> 00:46:56,060
where that needs to be done.

1096
00:46:56,060 --> 00:46:57,060
There is an agreement that needs

1097
00:46:57,060 --> 00:46:59,060
to be made with the public works

1098
00:46:59,060 --> 00:47:01,020
of the city that means we have

1099
00:47:01,020 --> 00:47:05,020
to wait until the referendum

1100
00:47:06,020 --> 00:47:07,020
process which is going to happen

1101
00:47:07,020 --> 00:47:10,020
if Council decides to vote to

1102
00:47:10,020 --> 00:47:12,020
approve the project tonight. We

1103
00:47:12,020 --> 00:47:14,020
can explain later the next

1104
00:47:14,020 --> 00:47:18,020
steps. But that could be done in

1105
00:47:18,020 --> 00:47:20,020
parallel, but as soon as the

1106
00:47:20,020 --> 00:47:25,020
work starts, there needs to be

1107
00:47:25,020 --> 00:47:26,020
that -- that needs to be moved.

1108
00:47:26,020 --> 00:47:27,020
There needs prior work to be

1109
00:47:27,020 --> 00:47:28,020
done and then they need to make

1110
00:47:28,020 --> 00:47:30,020
sure that everything is secured

1111
00:47:30,020 --> 00:47:32,020
and stuff like this, so five

1112
00:47:32,020 --> 00:47:34,020
years to be honest is kind of

1113
00:47:34,020 --> 00:47:36,020
short to realize a project like

1114
00:47:36,020 --> 00:47:39,020
that and it is important to know

1115
00:47:39,020 --> 00:47:42,020
that the major work that's going

1116
00:47:42,020 --> 00:47:46,020
to cause traffic or trucks

1117
00:47:46,020 --> 00:47:51,020
coming in and out and air

1118
00:47:51,020 --> 00:47:52,020
pollution or dust and stuff like

1119
00:47:52,020 --> 00:47:55,020
that is when they are building

1120
00:47:55,020 --> 00:47:56,020
the structure. But after that,

1121
00:47:56,020 --> 00:47:59,020
most of the work, like nine

1122
00:47:59,020 --> 00:48:01,080
months, 9 to 12 months, is

1123
00:48:01,080 --> 00:48:05,080
inside and after that, they put

1124
00:48:05,080 --> 00:48:07,080
the exterior -- so 18 months is

1125
00:48:07,080 --> 00:48:08,080
kind of fair to a project like

1126
00:48:08,080 --> 00:48:11,080
that and in other cities, four

1127
00:48:11,080 --> 00:48:14,080
towers of 12 storeys, they can

1128
00:48:14,080 --> 00:48:17,080
do it in 18 months. So, for four

1129
00:48:17,080 --> 00:48:19,080
storeys and it's not their first

1130
00:48:19,080 --> 00:48:21,080
project. So, we think it is a

1131
00:48:21,080 --> 00:48:23,080
reasonable time to achieve that

1132
00:48:23,080 --> 00:48:25,080
whole project within the five

1133
00:48:25,080 --> 00:48:27,080
years that is proposed to

1134
00:48:27,080 --> 00:48:29,080
Council to approve.

1135
00:48:29,080 --> 00:48:31,080
>> But at the end of the day,

1136
00:48:31,080 --> 00:48:32,080
wouldn't it make more sense that

1137
00:48:32,080 --> 00:48:36,080
if you start the project, you do

1138
00:48:36,080 --> 00:48:39,080
it from a to z? What you're

1139
00:48:39,080 --> 00:48:40,080
sounding like you're going to do

1140
00:48:40,080 --> 00:48:44,080
partial work because there is

1141
00:48:44,080 --> 00:48:46,080
infringements on part of the

1142
00:48:46,080 --> 00:48:47,080
lot.

1143
00:48:47,080 --> 00:48:51,080
>> No, it's also, and tomorrow,

1144
00:48:51,080 --> 00:48:52,080
if Council approved the project

1145
00:48:52,080 --> 00:48:56,080
tonight, there is going to be

1146
00:48:56,080 --> 00:48:57,080
refused documents on the website

1147
00:48:57,080 --> 00:49:01,040
and in that document, there's an

1148
00:49:01,040 --> 00:49:02,040
old page that explains why

1149
00:49:02,040 --> 00:49:04,040
they're doing it in phases,

1150
00:49:04,040 --> 00:49:07,040
because there are some

1151
00:49:07,040 --> 00:49:10,040
commercial users right now that

1152
00:49:10,040 --> 00:49:11,040
are going to move in the

1153
00:49:11,040 --> 00:49:13,040
building, so they're asking to

1154
00:49:13,040 --> 00:49:14,040
do demolition of the plaza in

1155
00:49:14,040 --> 00:49:16,040
sections and then they have to

1156
00:49:16,040 --> 00:49:18,040
make sure they are moving and

1157
00:49:18,040 --> 00:49:20,040
then to the other part. This is

1158
00:49:20,040 --> 00:49:23,040
all explained in the document

1159
00:49:23,040 --> 00:49:25,040
that is going to be uploaded

1160
00:49:25,040 --> 00:49:27,040
tomorrow, if Council's approved

1161
00:49:27,040 --> 00:49:29,040
tonight. And if I may, there's

1162
00:49:29,040 --> 00:49:34,040
another condition that is in the

1163
00:49:34,040 --> 00:49:35,040
resolution if Council approved

1164
00:49:35,040 --> 00:49:38,040
tonight. There is a committee of

1165
00:49:38,040 --> 00:49:43,040
-- the promoter, that is why the

1166
00:49:43,040 --> 00:49:45,040
promoter agreed to that after a

1167
00:49:45,040 --> 00:49:48,040
public consultation and it's a

1168
00:49:48,040 --> 00:49:49,040
good practice. It's being done

1169
00:49:49,040 --> 00:49:51,040
in other cities and the fact

1170
00:49:51,040 --> 00:49:53,040
that it is going to be in the

1171
00:49:53,040 --> 00:49:54,040
resolution, we have to enforce

1172
00:49:54,040 --> 00:49:57,040
that it is maintained. There are

1173
00:49:57,040 --> 00:49:59,040
some elected officials that are

1174
00:49:59,040 --> 00:50:03,000
going to sit on that committee,

1175
00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:04,000
so it's --

1176
00:50:04,000 --> 00:50:05,000
>> But correct me if I'm wrong,

1177
00:50:05,000 --> 00:50:08,000
that committee has absolutely no

1178
00:50:08,000 --> 00:50:11,000
rights. The people that --

1179
00:50:11,000 --> 00:50:12,000
>> Give somebody else an

1180
00:50:12,000 --> 00:50:13,000
opportunity.

1181
00:50:13,000 --> 00:50:14,000
>> I have a question, that's

1182
00:50:14,000 --> 00:50:15,000
fine because my name is Victoria

1183
00:50:15,000 --> 00:50:18,000
and I live at 251 Brighton. I

1184
00:50:18,000 --> 00:50:19,000
actually went to one of the

1185
00:50:19,000 --> 00:50:22,000
meetings that was held by the

1186
00:50:22,000 --> 00:50:25,000
promoter at revolution hair

1187
00:50:25,000 --> 00:50:26,000
studio, where it was treated

1188
00:50:26,000 --> 00:50:28,000
very poorly by the promoter. I

1189
00:50:28,000 --> 00:50:30,000
don't believe that the promoter

1190
00:50:30,000 --> 00:50:32,000
has any interest in what the

1191
00:50:32,000 --> 00:50:35,000
community has to say and it's

1192
00:50:35,000 --> 00:50:36,000
only interested in the bottom

1193
00:50:36,000 --> 00:50:38,000
line, obviously, of his project.

1194
00:50:38,000 --> 00:50:42,000
So, I would like to know the

1195
00:50:42,000 --> 00:50:44,000
past projects that he has done,

1196
00:50:44,000 --> 00:50:47,000
what are they? And do they have

1197
00:50:47,000 --> 00:50:48,000
any examples? This was a

1198
00:50:48,000 --> 00:50:50,000
question that I brought to

1199
00:50:50,000 --> 00:50:52,000
Council a few months ago and I

1200
00:50:52,000 --> 00:50:54,000
don't think anyone has looked

1201
00:50:54,000 --> 00:50:59,000
into it.

1202
00:51:01,060 --> 00:51:05,060
>> We have done other --

1203
00:51:05,060 --> 00:51:06,060
>> Have you seen the past

1204
00:51:06,060 --> 00:51:08,060
projects? Can we have names of

1205
00:51:08,060 --> 00:51:09,060
those past projects?

1206
00:51:09,060 --> 00:51:12,060
>> Tonight we are approving the

1207
00:51:12,060 --> 00:51:14,060
PPCMOI, not the architectural

1208
00:51:14,060 --> 00:51:15,060
project.

1209
00:51:15,060 --> 00:51:16,060
>> I don't care about the

1210
00:51:16,060 --> 00:51:18,060
architectural project. I want to

1211
00:51:18,060 --> 00:51:19,060
make sure it gets done and get

1212
00:51:19,060 --> 00:51:20,060
some properly.

1213
00:51:20,060 --> 00:51:21,060
>> PPCMOI just as I told you

1214
00:51:21,060 --> 00:51:24,060
before, is the first step and

1215
00:51:24,060 --> 00:51:27,060
then we will come to the

1216
00:51:27,060 --> 00:51:29,060
architectural project.

1217
00:51:29,060 --> 00:51:30,060
>> It's not about the

1218
00:51:30,060 --> 00:51:31,060
architectural project. We saw

1219
00:51:31,060 --> 00:51:32,060
the Artemis, how well that went

1220
00:51:32,060 --> 00:51:33,060
over.

1221
00:51:33,060 --> 00:51:37,060
>> The PPCMOI, if you will have

1222
00:51:37,060 --> 00:51:38,060
the opportunity to vote against

1223
00:51:38,060 --> 00:51:41,060
it. So, if you want to vote

1224
00:51:41,060 --> 00:51:43,060
against it, you will have the

1225
00:51:43,060 --> 00:51:45,060
opportunity in the referendum.

1226
00:51:45,060 --> 00:51:47,060
>> The referendum is not a good

1227
00:51:47,060 --> 00:51:50,060
referendum. It includes a huge

1228
00:51:50,060 --> 00:51:52,060
zone that is not part of our

1229
00:51:52,060 --> 00:51:56,060
area that does not concern the

1230
00:51:56,060 --> 00:51:57,060
residents.

1231
00:51:57,060 --> 00:51:58,060
>> Madam, I don't think I've

1232
00:51:58,060 --> 00:52:00,020
changed your mind on this topic.

1233
00:52:00,020 --> 00:52:01,020
>> I don't think so but I would

1234
00:52:01,020 --> 00:52:02,020
like to know if you've looked

1235
00:52:02,020 --> 00:52:04,020
into the past projects and what

1236
00:52:04,020 --> 00:52:05,020
they are. That is my question.

1237
00:52:05,020 --> 00:52:06,020
>> Thank you.

1238
00:52:06,020 --> 00:52:09,020
>> -- Monsieur le Maire to

1239
00:52:09,020 --> 00:52:10,020
answer your, avec votre

1240
00:52:10,020 --> 00:52:11,020
permission question, any project

1241
00:52:11,020 --> 00:52:14,020
that we now adopt, whether it's

1242
00:52:14,020 --> 00:52:16,020
this one tonight or another one

1243
00:52:16,020 --> 00:52:18,020
coming in the next two months or

1244
00:52:18,020 --> 00:52:21,020
two years, many projects that

1245
00:52:21,020 --> 00:52:26,020
require this type of approval --

1246
00:52:27,020 --> 00:52:30,020
this one, whatever, we have put

1247
00:52:30,020 --> 00:52:34,020
into our bylaw since at amiss

1248
00:52:34,020 --> 00:52:35,020
has become what is now, you

1249
00:52:35,020 --> 00:52:39,020
know, the -- we have put into

1250
00:52:39,020 --> 00:52:43,020
our bylaws financial guarantees.

1251
00:52:43,020 --> 00:52:47,020
So, --

1252
00:52:47,020 --> 00:52:51,020
>> Other financial --

1253
00:52:51,020 --> 00:52:53,020
>> I'm sorry, I'm a frustrated

1254
00:52:53,020 --> 00:52:55,020
resident because -- I wasn't

1255
00:52:55,020 --> 00:52:58,020
treated with respect. What tells

1256
00:52:58,020 --> 00:53:01,080
me about that is that there is

1257
00:53:01,080 --> 00:53:03,080
no open communication, even if

1258
00:53:03,080 --> 00:53:06,080
we have this group that's

1259
00:53:06,080 --> 00:53:09,080
formed, right? Are we going to

1260
00:53:09,080 --> 00:53:11,080
be able to have a any say on

1261
00:53:11,080 --> 00:53:13,080
anything? Does that group have

1262
00:53:13,080 --> 00:53:14,080
any power at all besides being

1263
00:53:14,080 --> 00:53:19,080
there to have an opinion?

1264
00:53:20,080 --> 00:53:22,080
>> If I could just add,

1265
00:53:22,080 --> 00:53:23,080
Victoria, I think based on some

1266
00:53:23,080 --> 00:53:26,080
of the questions -- plaza, that

1267
00:53:26,080 --> 00:53:27,080
was something we were concerned

1268
00:53:27,080 --> 00:53:31,080
about and the City did contact

1269
00:53:31,080 --> 00:53:33,080
the developer, it'd come back

1270
00:53:33,080 --> 00:53:34,080
with a whole portfolio. They

1271
00:53:34,080 --> 00:53:37,080
have experience, we require that

1272
00:53:37,080 --> 00:53:38,080
they had the financial

1273
00:53:38,080 --> 00:53:41,080
possession. We were told that

1274
00:53:41,080 --> 00:53:42,080
there are some partners behind

1275
00:53:42,080 --> 00:53:45,080
our that are very successful.

1276
00:53:45,080 --> 00:53:47,080
But as usual, like no company is

1277
00:53:47,080 --> 00:53:49,080
going to throw all their assets

1278
00:53:49,080 --> 00:53:51,080
into a building, so these are

1279
00:53:51,080 --> 00:53:52,080
all different companies, so

1280
00:53:52,080 --> 00:53:53,080
there's only so far that you

1281
00:53:53,080 --> 00:53:55,080
could go on this thing. In terms

1282
00:53:55,080 --> 00:53:58,080
of do they have experience?

1283
00:53:58,080 --> 00:53:59,080
>> --

1284
00:53:59,080 --> 00:54:00,040
>> Do they know what they're

1285
00:54:00,040 --> 00:54:03,040
doing? The answer is yes. That

1286
00:54:03,040 --> 00:54:07,040
doesn't change, you know, the

1287
00:54:07,040 --> 00:54:12,040
way that he came on to it --

1288
00:54:16,040 --> 00:54:17,040
>> Louise, sur la rue Beaudin.

1289
00:54:17,040 --> 00:54:18,040
Bon...

1290
00:54:18,040 --> 00:54:20,040
>> Now it's going to be the

1291
00:54:20,040 --> 00:54:23,040
third question on 275 elm. I

1292
00:54:23,040 --> 00:54:24,040
will ask --

1293
00:54:24,040 --> 00:54:25,040
>> It's a project!

1294
00:54:25,040 --> 00:54:30,040
>> I will ask, if you -- please

1295
00:54:30,040 --> 00:54:33,040
lineup because, please lineup

1296
00:54:33,040 --> 00:54:35,040
because at one point, we are

1297
00:54:35,040 --> 00:54:40,040
going over the period and I will

1298
00:54:40,040 --> 00:54:43,040
have asked a question, if the

1299
00:54:43,040 --> 00:54:45,040
council wants to continue on the

1300
00:54:45,040 --> 00:54:49,040
question period. So, this is the

1301
00:54:49,040 --> 00:54:51,040
lineup and that will be the end

1302
00:54:51,040 --> 00:54:52,040
of the question at that point.

1303
00:54:52,040 --> 00:54:54,040
Thank you.

1304
00:54:54,040 --> 00:54:59,040
- Bon. On avait un zonage, vous

1305
00:54:59,040 --> 00:55:01,000
l'avez changé pour deux alors il

1306
00:55:01,000 --> 00:55:02,000
a l'air de dire que ça va

1307
00:55:02,000 --> 00:55:05,000
prendre 5 ans, ça va être par

1308
00:55:05,000 --> 00:55:07,000
session. Alors est-ce qu'un

1309
00:55:07,000 --> 00:55:09,000
zonage, un permis? Deuxième

1310
00:55:09,000 --> 00:55:11,000
zonage, deuxième permis? Ça

1311
00:55:11,000 --> 00:55:15,000
pourrait être séparé en deux?

1312
00:55:15,000 --> 00:55:16,000
- Je ne sais pas... je n'ai

1313
00:55:16,000 --> 00:55:17,000
aucune idée.

1314
00:55:17,000 --> 00:55:20,000
(brouhaha)

1315
00:55:21,000 --> 00:55:23,000
- Répondre à la demande qui a

1316
00:55:23,000 --> 00:55:27,000
été faite par le promoteur...

1317
00:55:27,000 --> 00:55:28,000
- Vous séparez ça alors vous

1318
00:55:28,000 --> 00:55:31,000
pouvez très bien commencé par

1319
00:55:31,000 --> 00:55:33,000
un, pas de permis, après, on

1320
00:55:33,000 --> 00:55:34,000
verra pour le deuxième. Là, en

1321
00:55:34,000 --> 00:55:38,000
ce moment, on ne sait pas

1322
00:55:38,000 --> 00:55:41,000
combien de ma servitude le mur

1323
00:55:41,000 --> 00:55:45,000
du stationnement. Ensuite de ça,

1324
00:55:45,000 --> 00:55:47,000
je ne sais pas la hauteur. Vous

1325
00:55:47,000 --> 00:55:50,000
changez de projet avec celui de

1326
00:55:50,000 --> 00:55:51,000
Bolton. On n'a rien de

1327
00:55:51,000 --> 00:55:53,000
spécifique. La hauteur du

1328
00:55:53,000 --> 00:55:57,000
garage... est-ce que les

1329
00:55:57,000 --> 00:55:58,000
appartements ont 8 pieds

1330
00:55:58,000 --> 00:56:00,060
seulement ou si ils sont plus

1331
00:56:00,060 --> 00:56:01,060
haut que ça?

1332
00:56:01,060 --> 00:56:05,060
- En ce moment, vous pourrez

1333
00:56:05,060 --> 00:56:06,060
voir les plants dès qu'ils

1334
00:56:06,060 --> 00:56:08,060
seront rendus publiques mais les

1335
00:56:08,060 --> 00:56:10,060
les ment des maisons de ville

1336
00:56:10,060 --> 00:56:12,060
sur Bolton n'apparaissent plus

1337
00:56:12,060 --> 00:56:14,060
dans la résolution parce que ces

1338
00:56:14,060 --> 00:56:16,060
bâtiments-là ont été rendus,

1339
00:56:16,060 --> 00:56:17,060
suite à la consultation

1340
00:56:17,060 --> 00:56:20,060
publique, le promoteur a réussi

1341
00:56:20,060 --> 00:56:22,060
à réduire les maisons de ville à

1342
00:56:22,060 --> 00:56:24,060
deux étages d'une hauteur de

1343
00:56:24,060 --> 00:56:28,060
moins de 10 mètres. Ça, c'est ce

1344
00:56:28,060 --> 00:56:30,060
qui est prévu au règlement. En

1345
00:56:30,060 --> 00:56:31,060
ce moment, ce qu'ils proposent,

1346
00:56:31,060 --> 00:56:33,060
à part le fait que ce soit du

1347
00:56:33,060 --> 00:56:34,060
résidentiel et que dans la zone,

1348
00:56:34,060 --> 00:56:36,060
c'est seulement du commercial

1349
00:56:36,060 --> 00:56:39,060
qui est permis, en ce moment,

1350
00:56:39,060 --> 00:56:40,060
deux étages et moins de 10

1351
00:56:40,060 --> 00:56:41,060
mètres de hauteur, c'est

1352
00:56:41,060 --> 00:56:42,060
conforme au règlement pour ça

1353
00:56:42,060 --> 00:56:44,060
s'élément. C'est pour ça que ça

1354
00:56:44,060 --> 00:56:46,060
a été retiré, ce n'est pas un

1355
00:56:46,060 --> 00:56:47,060
élément qui est dérogatoire

1356
00:56:47,060 --> 00:56:50,060
maintenant à part usage.

1357
00:56:50,060 --> 00:56:52,060
- Moi je parlais en pied

1358
00:56:52,060 --> 00:56:53,060
encore... 10 mètres, à ce que

1359
00:56:53,060 --> 00:56:55,060
c'est pour chaque étage?

1360
00:56:55,060 --> 00:56:56,060
- C'est la hauteur totale du

1361
00:56:56,060 --> 00:56:57,060
bâtiment.

1362
00:56:57,060 --> 00:56:58,060
- 10 mètres?

1363
00:56:58,060 --> 00:57:01,020
- Oui. Un bâtiment comme par

1364
00:57:01,020 --> 00:57:03,020
exemple le vôtre, c'est une

1365
00:57:03,020 --> 00:57:04,020
hauteur maximale de 9,2 mètres.

1366
00:57:04,020 --> 00:57:08,020
- O.K.. Bon, ensuite, le toit,

1367
00:57:08,020 --> 00:57:10,020
est-ce qu'il va être plein? On

1368
00:57:10,020 --> 00:57:11,020
ne sait pas, vous avez changé...

1369
00:57:11,020 --> 00:57:15,020
pour en avant, oups... ça, c'est

1370
00:57:15,020 --> 00:57:17,020
correct, je n'en parle pas. Je

1371
00:57:17,020 --> 00:57:18,020
parle juste celui qui touche ma

1372
00:57:18,020 --> 00:57:19,020
maison.

1373
00:57:19,020 --> 00:57:20,020
- Pour le moment, ce qu'on sait,

1374
00:57:20,020 --> 00:57:22,020
c'est les paramètres généraux

1375
00:57:22,020 --> 00:57:24,020
globaux du projet. La hauteur,

1376
00:57:24,020 --> 00:57:26,020
la dimension, la distance par

1377
00:57:26,020 --> 00:57:28,020
rapport aux listes de terrain.

1378
00:57:28,020 --> 00:57:29,020
Pour ce qui a trait à

1379
00:57:29,020 --> 00:57:30,020
l'architecture, comment les

1380
00:57:30,020 --> 00:57:32,020
volumes vont être traitées,

1381
00:57:32,020 --> 00:57:33,020
est-ce que ça va dépendre d'où

1382
00:57:33,020 --> 00:57:35,020
seront situés les fenêtres? Ça,

1383
00:57:35,020 --> 00:57:36,020
ce sera dans une phase

1384
00:57:36,020 --> 00:57:37,020
subséquente une fois que le

1385
00:57:37,020 --> 00:57:38,020
processus référendaire sera

1386
00:57:38,020 --> 00:57:40,020
fait. Le comité consultatif

1387
00:57:40,020 --> 00:57:41,020
d'urbanisme, c'est le même

1388
00:57:41,020 --> 00:57:44,020
processus que pour tous les

1389
00:57:44,020 --> 00:57:47,020
projets. Le comité va analyser

1390
00:57:47,020 --> 00:57:48,020
la demande en fonction des

1391
00:57:48,020 --> 00:57:49,020
critères qui sont établis pour

1392
00:57:49,020 --> 00:57:51,020
cette zone et il pourra formuler

1393
00:57:51,020 --> 00:57:52,020
des recommandations au conseil

1394
00:57:52,020 --> 00:57:54,020
qui décidera d'approuver ou non

1395
00:57:54,020 --> 00:57:58,020
l'architecture. C'est vraiment

1396
00:57:58,020 --> 00:57:59,020
deux morceaux qui sont séparées.

1397
00:57:59,020 --> 00:58:00,080
Pour le moment, c'est vraiment

1398
00:58:00,080 --> 00:58:02,080
une bonne façon d'expliquer.

1399
00:58:02,080 --> 00:58:03,080
C'est comme si on disait: bon,

1400
00:58:03,080 --> 00:58:05,080
ça va être deux poids une

1401
00:58:05,080 --> 00:58:06,080
par-dessus l'autre qui vont être

1402
00:58:06,080 --> 00:58:07,080
à une telle distance de la ligne

1403
00:58:07,080 --> 00:58:08,080
de terrain. Après on, va venir

1404
00:58:08,080 --> 00:58:10,080
ajouter des couleurs, le type de

1405
00:58:10,080 --> 00:58:11,080
matériaux, des briques, dépend,

1406
00:58:11,080 --> 00:58:12,080
des choses comme ça. On n'est

1407
00:58:12,080 --> 00:58:14,080
pas encore là comme ça. On est

1408
00:58:14,080 --> 00:58:16,080
sur des gros paramètres de la

1409
00:58:16,080 --> 00:58:18,080
forme générale du projet.

1410
00:58:18,080 --> 00:58:19,080
- Alors, est-ce qu'on va avoir

1411
00:58:19,080 --> 00:58:20,080
quelque chose à dire sur

1412
00:58:20,080 --> 00:58:25,080
celui-là? Si vous changez de

1413
00:58:26,080 --> 00:58:28,080
projet, en arrière de chez

1414
00:58:28,080 --> 00:58:29,080
moi... est-ce que j'aurais

1415
00:58:29,080 --> 00:58:32,080
quelque chose à dire après quand

1416
00:58:32,080 --> 00:58:33,080
vous présentez...

1417
00:58:33,080 --> 00:58:34,080
- Quand c'est présenté au pays

1418
00:58:34,080 --> 00:58:36,080
a, c'est le comité consultatif

1419
00:58:36,080 --> 00:58:40,080
d'urbanisme qui est un comité

1420
00:58:40,080 --> 00:58:41,080
consultatif de citoyens. Un élu

1421
00:58:41,080 --> 00:58:44,080
qui est président et une autre

1422
00:58:44,080 --> 00:58:46,080
élue qui assiste aussi et qui

1423
00:58:46,080 --> 00:58:48,080
sont la voix des résidents, dans

1424
00:58:48,080 --> 00:58:49,080
le fond, pour s'assurer que ce

1425
00:58:49,080 --> 00:58:54,080
règlement-là... pour vérifier

1426
00:58:54,080 --> 00:58:55,080
l'architecture, il est bien

1427
00:58:55,080 --> 00:58:58,080
appliqué. Tous les projets, il y

1428
00:58:58,080 --> 00:59:00,040
en a plusieurs à toutes les

1429
00:59:00,040 --> 00:59:01,040
séances du conseil, c'est un

1430
00:59:01,040 --> 00:59:03,040
comité de citoyens qui

1431
00:59:03,040 --> 00:59:04,040
recommande ou non d'approuver

1432
00:59:04,040 --> 00:59:06,040
l'architecture. Ça va être le

1433
00:59:06,040 --> 00:59:07,040
même processus.

1434
00:59:07,040 --> 00:59:08,040
- Ça va être juste avec le

1435
00:59:08,040 --> 00:59:09,040
conseil. Nous autres, on aura

1436
00:59:09,040 --> 00:59:10,040
plus rien à dire.

1437
00:59:10,040 --> 00:59:12,040
- Pour ce processus-là, non, les

1438
00:59:12,040 --> 00:59:13,040
citoyens qui ont quelque chose à

1439
00:59:13,040 --> 00:59:15,040
dire, c'est ceux qui sont sur le

1440
00:59:15,040 --> 00:59:17,040
comité consultatif d'urbanisme.

1441
00:59:17,040 --> 00:59:18,040
- On va se mettre sur le

1442
00:59:18,040 --> 00:59:19,040
comité...

1443
00:59:19,040 --> 00:59:21,040
(rires)

1444
00:59:21,040 --> 00:59:25,040
- Vous avez toujours la période

1445
00:59:25,040 --> 00:59:26,040
référendaire où il y aura un

1446
00:59:26,040 --> 00:59:30,040
registre. C'est là que vous

1447
00:59:30,040 --> 00:59:34,040
aurez quelque chose à dire.

1448
00:59:35,040 --> 00:59:36,040
- J'aimerais, après le vote,

1449
00:59:36,040 --> 00:59:39,040
vous votez ce soir.

1450
00:59:39,040 --> 00:59:41,040
- On va voter sur les PPCMOI,

1451
00:59:41,040 --> 00:59:43,040
oui.

1452
00:59:43,040 --> 00:59:46,040
- Pour approuver le projet.

1453
00:59:46,040 --> 00:59:47,040
- Pour approuver le PPCMOI.

1454
00:59:47,040 --> 00:59:48,040
- Eh bien, qu'est-ce que c'est,

1455
00:59:48,040 --> 00:59:50,040
au juste?

1456
00:59:50,040 --> 00:59:51,040
- Ce n'est pas la même chose.

1457
00:59:51,040 --> 00:59:53,040
C'est ça qu'il essayais de vous

1458
00:59:53,040 --> 00:59:54,040
expliquer. Un PPCMOI, c'est la

1459
00:59:54,040 --> 00:59:55,040
boîte.

1460
00:59:55,040 --> 00:59:57,040
- La boîte.

1461
00:59:57,040 --> 01:00:00,000
- La façon dont

1462
01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:01,000
l'architecture... l'architecture

1463
01:00:01,000 --> 01:00:02,000
de la boîte, ça va être une

1464
01:00:02,000 --> 01:00:05,000
deuxième phase. Où il y a un

1465
01:00:05,000 --> 01:00:09,000
PIA. Il faudra passer à travers

1466
01:00:09,000 --> 01:00:10,000
le même processus.

1467
01:00:10,000 --> 01:00:12,000
- Mais on n'a rien à dire...

1468
01:00:12,000 --> 01:00:16,000
- Les consultations avec une

1469
01:00:16,000 --> 01:00:18,000
recommandation du CCU. Et encore

1470
01:00:18,000 --> 01:00:22,000
une fois, il y aura un vote

1471
01:00:22,000 --> 01:00:24,000
référendaire à ce moment-là.

1472
01:00:24,000 --> 01:00:26,000
- Alors, si jamais après ce

1473
01:00:26,000 --> 01:00:28,000
soir, après que vous ayez voté,

1474
01:00:28,000 --> 01:00:30,000
et j'aimerais vous parler...

1475
01:00:30,000 --> 01:00:31,000
- Vous pouvez me parler

1476
01:00:31,000 --> 01:00:33,000
n'importe quand.

1477
01:00:33,000 --> 01:00:34,000
- Ça dépend du vote...

1478
01:00:34,000 --> 01:00:37,000
(rires)

1479
01:00:40,000 --> 01:00:41,000
- Comme on dit, en bon français,

1480
01:00:41,000 --> 01:00:42,000
attachez votre tuque!

1481
01:00:42,000 --> 01:00:45,000
(rires)

1482
01:00:45,000 --> 01:00:47,000
je suis plus petite que la

1483
01:00:47,000 --> 01:00:49,000
moyenne. Bonsoir, je m'appelle

1484
01:00:49,000 --> 01:00:51,000
Christine, je ne suis pas

1485
01:00:51,000 --> 01:00:52,000
résidente du secteur en

1486
01:00:52,000 --> 01:00:54,000
particulier mais j'ai suivi, je

1487
01:00:54,000 --> 01:00:55,000
suis résidente de Beaconsfield

1488
01:00:55,000 --> 01:00:59,000
et j'ai suivi depuis le début de

1489
01:00:59,000 --> 01:01:01,060
l'histoire du redéveloppement du

1490
01:01:01,060 --> 01:01:02,060
Plaza elle-même. Je vais faire

1491
01:01:02,060 --> 01:01:03,060
mon commentaire. J'ai une

1492
01:01:03,060 --> 01:01:04,060
question à la fin du

1493
01:01:04,060 --> 01:01:05,060
commentaire. Je vais commencer

1494
01:01:05,060 --> 01:01:06,060
en français et je vais changer à

1495
01:01:06,060 --> 01:01:07,060
l'anglais parce que je pense que

1496
01:01:07,060 --> 01:01:11,060
c'est bilingue dans la salle. Je

1497
01:01:11,060 --> 01:01:13,060
pense que la question du CIO

1498
01:01:13,060 --> 01:01:15,060
est, le fameux taux

1499
01:01:15,060 --> 01:01:16,060
d'implantation qui est souvent

1500
01:01:16,060 --> 01:01:17,060
discutée, Jason n'est pas là, je

1501
01:01:17,060 --> 01:01:18,060
ne corrigerait s'il n'était pas

1502
01:01:18,060 --> 01:01:21,060
là... il s'est trompé dans ses

1503
01:01:21,060 --> 01:01:26,060
calculs. Mais le 1,18... tout

1504
01:01:26,060 --> 01:01:27,060
ça, dans le fond, c'est des

1505
01:01:27,060 --> 01:01:28,060
chiffres qui, dans l'absolu, ne

1506
01:01:28,060 --> 01:01:30,060
veulent pas dire grand-chose. À

1507
01:01:30,060 --> 01:01:31,060
Montréal, vous pouvez avoir un

1508
01:01:31,060 --> 01:01:33,060
projet qui est en plein

1509
01:01:33,060 --> 01:01:38,060
centre-ville. Ça devient un COS

1510
01:01:40,060 --> 01:01:42,060
des deux ou des deux 0... 2,5.

1511
01:01:42,060 --> 01:01:43,060
(---)

1512
01:01:43,060 --> 01:01:45,060
ça devient un COS des un ou de

1513
01:01:45,060 --> 01:01:47,060
1,5. La question, c'est le

1514
01:01:47,060 --> 01:01:48,060
différentiel et comment il

1515
01:01:48,060 --> 01:01:49,060
s'intègre dans le cadre

1516
01:01:49,060 --> 01:01:52,060
existant. C'est d'ailleurs même

1517
01:01:52,060 --> 01:01:55,060
mentionné dans vos règlements.

1518
01:01:55,060 --> 01:01:57,060
L'important, c'est que le projet

1519
01:01:57,060 --> 01:02:00,020
soit intégré dans le cadre bâti

1520
01:02:00,020 --> 01:02:01,020
existant et comment on perd avec

1521
01:02:01,020 --> 01:02:03,020
les environ. Ici, à

1522
01:02:03,020 --> 01:02:06,020
Beaconsfield, un COS de 0,8 ou

1523
01:02:06,020 --> 01:02:07,020
un, c'est normal pour un taux

1524
01:02:07,020 --> 01:02:08,020
familial, pour un quartier

1525
01:02:08,020 --> 01:02:12,020
familial. Un COS de 1,8, c'est

1526
01:02:12,020 --> 01:02:13,020
quasiment doubler, si ce n'est

1527
01:02:13,020 --> 01:02:14,020
pas plus, étant donné l'impact

1528
01:02:14,020 --> 01:02:17,020
sur les auteurs, du calcul des

1529
01:02:17,020 --> 01:02:18,020
unités et des densité possibles.

1530
01:02:18,020 --> 01:02:21,020
Je pense que là demeure l'enjeu

1531
01:02:21,020 --> 01:02:22,020
principal par rapport à la

1532
01:02:22,020 --> 01:02:23,020
population dans le secteur. Ce

1533
01:02:23,020 --> 01:02:24,020
que vous n'êtes pas dans un

1534
01:02:24,020 --> 01:02:25,020
secteur du centre-ville, vous

1535
01:02:25,020 --> 01:02:26,020
n'êtes pas dans un secteur non

1536
01:02:26,020 --> 01:02:28,020
plus comme le projet dus à la

1537
01:02:28,020 --> 01:02:32,020
mise... qui malgré son taux du

1538
01:02:32,020 --> 01:02:35,020
1,6, et madame Mireille l'a bien

1539
01:02:35,020 --> 01:02:36,020
expliqué, le secteur du

1540
01:02:36,020 --> 01:02:37,020
(---)

1541
01:02:37,020 --> 01:02:38,020
est un secteur particulier. Il

1542
01:02:38,020 --> 01:02:39,020
n'a pas le même cadre bâti

1543
01:02:39,020 --> 01:02:43,020
environnants. Ce projet-là,

1544
01:02:43,020 --> 01:02:45,020
croit que similaires, n'aura pas

1545
01:02:45,020 --> 01:02:49,020
le même impact, vous avez des

1546
01:02:49,020 --> 01:02:50,020
étages, des bâtiments à quatre

1547
01:02:50,020 --> 01:02:52,020
étages en plein milieu, je

1548
01:02:52,020 --> 01:02:53,020
remarque et en passant, je

1549
01:02:53,020 --> 01:02:54,020
voulais passer le bravo à

1550
01:02:54,020 --> 01:02:56,020
l'équipe de la ville pour avoir

1551
01:02:56,020 --> 01:02:57,020
quand même commissionné une

1552
01:02:57,020 --> 01:03:01,080
deuxième étude de trafic. Le

1553
01:03:01,080 --> 01:03:02,080
timing était malheureux parce

1554
01:03:02,080 --> 01:03:03,080
que tout le monde était en grève

1555
01:03:03,080 --> 01:03:04,080
mais vous l'avez quand même

1556
01:03:04,080 --> 01:03:05,080
fait, vous avez imposé des

1557
01:03:05,080 --> 01:03:07,080
changements au promoteur. Il y a

1558
01:03:07,080 --> 01:03:08,080
clairement une volonté d'écouter

1559
01:03:08,080 --> 01:03:11,080
les citoyens. Le promoteur s'est

1560
01:03:11,080 --> 01:03:12,080
mis d'accord pour ces

1561
01:03:12,080 --> 01:03:13,080
aspects-là. Cela dit, et là, je

1562
01:03:13,080 --> 01:03:16,080
vais passer en anglais... It's

1563
01:03:16,080 --> 01:03:18,080
cosmetic changes. So the bulk of

1564
01:03:18,080 --> 01:03:20,080
the issue remains the density

1565
01:03:20,080 --> 01:03:22,080
that essentially is way too high

1566
01:03:22,080 --> 01:03:25,080
for that neighbourhood. So yes,

1567
01:03:25,080 --> 01:03:26,080
the residents on both, it's

1568
01:03:26,080 --> 01:03:27,080
going to be a bit better for

1569
01:03:27,080 --> 01:03:30,080
them, they have one floor less.

1570
01:03:30,080 --> 01:03:31,080
But everyone around is still

1571
01:03:31,080 --> 01:03:34,080
going to suffer a devastating

1572
01:03:34,080 --> 01:03:35,080
impact of a huge increase

1573
01:03:35,080 --> 01:03:37,080
compared to the neighbourhood.

1574
01:03:37,080 --> 01:03:41,080
So my question, and I think

1575
01:03:41,080 --> 01:03:42,080
there's a lot of goodwill on the

1576
01:03:42,080 --> 01:03:44,080
part of the city, but I don't

1577
01:03:44,080 --> 01:03:46,080
know to what degree the

1578
01:03:46,080 --> 01:03:47,080
relationship is transparent with

1579
01:03:47,080 --> 01:03:49,080
the developer. Clearly there's

1580
01:03:49,080 --> 01:03:51,080
good reason for the City to

1581
01:03:51,080 --> 01:03:53,080
approve a project like this,

1582
01:03:53,080 --> 01:03:54,080
it's understandable. And

1583
01:03:54,080 --> 01:03:55,080
obviously the developer want to

1584
01:03:55,080 --> 01:03:57,080
maximize profit, that's also

1585
01:03:57,080 --> 01:03:58,080
understandable. But it's not

1586
01:03:58,080 --> 01:04:00,040
worth the cost and sacrifice for

1587
01:04:00,040 --> 01:04:01,040
citizens in that area. There

1588
01:04:01,040 --> 01:04:03,040
will come other projects. And if

1589
01:04:03,040 --> 01:04:05,040
ever, my question is, has a

1590
01:04:05,040 --> 01:04:07,040
development mention the fact

1591
01:04:07,040 --> 01:04:09,040
that in two years the bylaw

1592
01:04:09,040 --> 01:04:12,040
might change in favour of

1593
01:04:12,040 --> 01:04:13,040
developers? He mentioned that?

1594
01:04:13,040 --> 01:04:14,040
Okay.

1595
01:04:14,040 --> 01:04:16,040
>> No, he did not mention that.

1596
01:04:16,040 --> 01:04:18,040
>> He knew?

1597
01:04:18,040 --> 01:04:19,040
>> No, but it's a fact. What you

1598
01:04:19,040 --> 01:04:20,040
just said is an absolute fact.

1599
01:04:20,040 --> 01:04:22,040
>> It's an absolute packed.

1600
01:04:22,040 --> 01:04:24,040
>> In two years, you can put ten

1601
01:04:24,040 --> 01:04:25,040
storeys.

1602
01:04:25,040 --> 01:04:26,040
>> So what's gonna happen for

1603
01:04:26,040 --> 01:04:27,040
the benefit of everybody? In ten

1604
01:04:27,040 --> 01:04:29,040
years, there will be a change of

1605
01:04:29,040 --> 01:04:31,040
provincial laws or by-laws that

1606
01:04:31,040 --> 01:04:34,040
is going to allow suppression of

1607
01:04:34,040 --> 01:04:36,040
citizen participation in

1608
01:04:36,040 --> 01:04:37,040
consultations. So this will

1609
01:04:37,040 --> 01:04:38,040
probably be one of the last

1610
01:04:38,040 --> 01:04:39,040
projects that gets to

1611
01:04:39,040 --> 01:04:41,040
participate. That being said,

1612
01:04:41,040 --> 01:04:42,040
and I heard through the

1613
01:04:42,040 --> 01:04:45,040
grapevine that the developer

1614
01:04:45,040 --> 01:04:47,040
mentioned that if let's say

1615
01:04:47,040 --> 01:04:50,040
there was a no or a rejection of

1616
01:04:50,040 --> 01:04:51,040
the project, he would sit on the

1617
01:04:51,040 --> 01:04:53,040
property for two years. I would

1618
01:04:53,040 --> 01:04:55,040
caution you not to believe that.

1619
01:04:55,040 --> 01:04:56,040
It's an empty threat. It happens

1620
01:04:56,040 --> 01:04:58,040
in real estate when the

1621
01:04:58,040 --> 01:05:00,000
developer has no other arguments

1622
01:05:00,000 --> 01:05:02,000
in his at the end of the rope

1623
01:05:02,000 --> 01:05:03,000
and scared.

1624
01:05:03,000 --> 01:05:05,000
>> Yeah, but most important, no

1625
01:05:05,000 --> 01:05:07,000
matter who is going to

1626
01:05:07,000 --> 01:05:10,000
eventually own that -- in two

1627
01:05:10,000 --> 01:05:13,000
years, somebody is going to own

1628
01:05:13,000 --> 01:05:15,000
it, and they can do whatever

1629
01:05:15,000 --> 01:05:17,000
they will want because the

1630
01:05:17,000 --> 01:05:20,000
demand will actually change,

1631
01:05:20,000 --> 01:05:25,000
increase the density and will

1632
01:05:25,000 --> 01:05:29,000
allow, and I will mention that

1633
01:05:29,000 --> 01:05:31,000
probably a much bigger project.

1634
01:05:31,000 --> 01:05:34,000
And right, now we are --

1635
01:05:34,000 --> 01:05:36,000
>> The City will conserve its

1636
01:05:36,000 --> 01:05:37,000
power though. The citizens will

1637
01:05:37,000 --> 01:05:38,000
not have much power left, but

1638
01:05:38,000 --> 01:05:43,000
the city will -- especially in

1639
01:05:43,000 --> 01:05:45,000
-- the City does have.

1640
01:05:45,000 --> 01:05:47,000
>> You know, we -- there is not

1641
01:05:47,000 --> 01:05:49,000
too many opportunities for

1642
01:05:49,000 --> 01:05:50,000
development in this city. And we

1643
01:05:50,000 --> 01:05:54,000
will have to consider seriously

1644
01:05:54,000 --> 01:05:55,000
any development that is being

1645
01:05:55,000 --> 01:05:57,000
proposed to us.

1646
01:05:57,000 --> 01:05:58,000
>> So assuming --

1647
01:05:58,000 --> 01:06:02,060
>> It's either that, or -- keep

1648
01:06:02,060 --> 01:06:04,060
going up, and they will go up.

1649
01:06:04,060 --> 01:06:06,060
And a lot more, because --

1650
01:06:06,060 --> 01:06:09,060
>> I hear you, I understand. Is

1651
01:06:09,060 --> 01:06:13,060
there a reason why you didn't

1652
01:06:13,060 --> 01:06:14,060
request a reduction of a number

1653
01:06:14,060 --> 01:06:16,060
of units to the developer?

1654
01:06:16,060 --> 01:06:17,060
>> We have already gone through

1655
01:06:17,060 --> 01:06:18,060
that.

1656
01:06:18,060 --> 01:06:19,060
>> And what did they say?

1657
01:06:19,060 --> 01:06:21,060
>> The project that's being

1658
01:06:21,060 --> 01:06:24,060
proposed to us is now less than

1659
01:06:24,060 --> 01:06:29,060
original. It's now -- it becomes

1660
01:06:29,060 --> 01:06:30,060
an economics situation.

1661
01:06:30,060 --> 01:06:32,060
>> The developer?

1662
01:06:32,060 --> 01:06:34,060
>> There comes a point where

1663
01:06:34,060 --> 01:06:36,060
he's gonna say no, I can't do

1664
01:06:36,060 --> 01:06:38,060
that project, because it's not

1665
01:06:38,060 --> 01:06:40,060
economical for me to do it. At

1666
01:06:40,060 --> 01:06:42,060
that point, he can sell it to

1667
01:06:42,060 --> 01:06:43,060
somebody else, whatever is going

1668
01:06:43,060 --> 01:06:47,060
to happen. But the point is you

1669
01:06:47,060 --> 01:06:50,060
brought so much. We have some

1670
01:06:50,060 --> 01:06:52,060
control over what's being done

1671
01:06:52,060 --> 01:06:54,060
now. In two, years we will not.

1672
01:06:54,060 --> 01:06:56,060
>> You will have less in terms

1673
01:06:56,060 --> 01:06:58,060
of the citizens but you'll still

1674
01:06:58,060 --> 01:07:01,020
have control over your PPCMOI.

1675
01:07:01,020 --> 01:07:03,020
So for the amount of changes --

1676
01:07:03,020 --> 01:07:04,020
>> We are forced to increase our

1677
01:07:04,020 --> 01:07:08,020
density by quite a bit.

1678
01:07:08,020 --> 01:07:10,020
>> So then what I would say is,

1679
01:07:10,020 --> 01:07:11,020
keep in mind you still have a

1680
01:07:11,020 --> 01:07:13,020
lot of power with the developer,

1681
01:07:13,020 --> 01:07:15,020
you can still request a lot of

1682
01:07:15,020 --> 01:07:17,020
things. And no developer in his

1683
01:07:17,020 --> 01:07:18,020
right mind is going to sit on a

1684
01:07:18,020 --> 01:07:22,020
property for two years, okay? So

1685
01:07:22,020 --> 01:07:23,020
they want to develop the

1686
01:07:23,020 --> 01:07:24,020
property.

1687
01:07:24,020 --> 01:07:27,020
>> What is being proposed now by

1688
01:07:27,020 --> 01:07:29,020
the promoter, with the

1689
01:07:29,020 --> 01:07:31,020
discussions that we've had,

1690
01:07:31,020 --> 01:07:32,020
that's the limit that he is

1691
01:07:32,020 --> 01:07:33,020
prepared to accept. Otherwise

1692
01:07:33,020 --> 01:07:35,020
there is no project.

1693
01:07:35,020 --> 01:07:37,020
>> So in that case, what I would

1694
01:07:37,020 --> 01:07:39,020
recommend, assuming you pass the

1695
01:07:39,020 --> 01:07:40,020
-- assuming that's what will

1696
01:07:40,020 --> 01:07:42,020
happen, in the neighbourhood

1697
01:07:42,020 --> 01:07:44,020
community, please include the

1698
01:07:44,020 --> 01:07:46,020
daycare, because it's not

1699
01:07:46,020 --> 01:07:47,020
included right now.

1700
01:07:47,020 --> 01:07:49,020
>> We are going to have a good

1701
01:07:49,020 --> 01:07:50,020
neighbour committee.

1702
01:07:50,020 --> 01:07:51,020
>> And also new construction

1703
01:07:51,020 --> 01:07:53,020
agreement with the developer,

1704
01:07:53,020 --> 01:07:55,020
make sure you include all the

1705
01:07:55,020 --> 01:07:56,020
guarantees and also the sound

1706
01:07:56,020 --> 01:07:58,020
barrier and the air pollution

1707
01:07:58,020 --> 01:07:59,020
barrier during construction for

1708
01:07:59,020 --> 01:08:01,080
the daycare, because it's a

1709
01:08:01,080 --> 01:08:04,080
minor cost for them and it can

1710
01:08:04,080 --> 01:08:06,080
do a lot to requests the air

1711
01:08:06,080 --> 01:08:08,080
transfer with the daycare.

1712
01:08:08,080 --> 01:08:09,080
>> I'm sure that is being

1713
01:08:09,080 --> 01:08:10,080
considered right now.

1714
01:08:10,080 --> 01:08:12,080
>> Okay. Thank you.

1715
01:08:12,080 --> 01:08:15,080
[Applause]

1716
01:08:18,080 --> 01:08:22,080
>> Hello, it's to fallen from --

1717
01:08:22,080 --> 01:08:26,080
I had a question from you guys

1718
01:08:26,080 --> 01:08:29,080
in terms of -- oh, sorry, tall

1719
01:08:29,080 --> 01:08:31,080
person problems. So I've a

1720
01:08:31,080 --> 01:08:33,080
question for you guys actually.

1721
01:08:33,080 --> 01:08:35,080
When this was originally

1722
01:08:35,080 --> 01:08:36,080
floated, the whole prospect of

1723
01:08:36,080 --> 01:08:39,080
this being a numbered company

1724
01:08:39,080 --> 01:08:40,080
was raised and people are

1725
01:08:40,080 --> 01:08:41,080
understandably concerned. Now,

1726
01:08:41,080 --> 01:08:43,080
we do understand that you have

1727
01:08:43,080 --> 01:08:45,080
spoken with these people behind

1728
01:08:45,080 --> 01:08:47,080
the developers, well, behind the

1729
01:08:47,080 --> 01:08:49,080
development company. My question

1730
01:08:49,080 --> 01:08:52,080
is, has the city done an actual

1731
01:08:52,080 --> 01:08:55,080
due diligence on these people?

1732
01:08:55,080 --> 01:08:56,080
Because saying that someone has

1733
01:08:56,080 --> 01:08:59,080
money to bankroll this --

1734
01:08:59,080 --> 01:09:03,040
>> Yes, we have. We have and we

1735
01:09:03,040 --> 01:09:04,040
know that the people behind the

1736
01:09:04,040 --> 01:09:07,040
project, the financiers behind

1737
01:09:07,040 --> 01:09:10,040
the project, have lots of money.

1738
01:09:10,040 --> 01:09:11,040
>> So where is the documentation

1739
01:09:11,040 --> 01:09:12,040
for this?

1740
01:09:12,040 --> 01:09:14,040
[Laughter]

1741
01:09:14,040 --> 01:09:16,040
It's -- you can ask the promoter

1742
01:09:16,040 --> 01:09:20,040
to give it to you, because it's

1743
01:09:20,040 --> 01:09:23,040
not available and it's not

1744
01:09:23,040 --> 01:09:24,040
public.

1745
01:09:24,040 --> 01:09:27,040
>> So we have someone who is not

1746
01:09:27,040 --> 01:09:28,040
--

1747
01:09:28,040 --> 01:09:29,040
>> It's not public, no.

1748
01:09:29,040 --> 01:09:31,040
>> I just want to establish that

1749
01:09:31,040 --> 01:09:32,040
was the case.

1750
01:09:32,040 --> 01:09:37,040
>> Thank you very much.

1751
01:09:38,040 --> 01:09:39,040
>> Good evening everyone, my

1752
01:09:39,040 --> 01:09:43,040
name is -- I'm the owner of the

1753
01:09:43,040 --> 01:09:46,040
daycare. Tonight, I stand before

1754
01:09:46,040 --> 01:09:49,040
you to advocate for the future

1755
01:09:49,040 --> 01:09:53,040
of -- Canada. Our 80 children.

1756
01:09:53,040 --> 01:09:58,040
The daycare director -- has

1757
01:09:58,040 --> 01:09:59,040
presented 1 million aspects of

1758
01:09:59,040 --> 01:10:03,000
the project's impact on children

1759
01:10:03,000 --> 01:10:06,000
aged zero to five. I want to

1760
01:10:06,000 --> 01:10:09,000
emphasize that when you vote for

1761
01:10:09,000 --> 01:10:10,000
this project, it's not just

1762
01:10:10,000 --> 01:10:12,000
about the children being

1763
01:10:12,000 --> 01:10:15,000
directly involved, nor is it

1764
01:10:15,000 --> 01:10:18,000
only about financial gains.

1765
01:10:18,000 --> 01:10:21,000
Early childhood education is a

1766
01:10:21,000 --> 01:10:22,000
collective responsibility that

1767
01:10:22,000 --> 01:10:25,000
shapes the future of our

1768
01:10:25,000 --> 01:10:29,000
society. I believe that each

1769
01:10:29,000 --> 01:10:30,000
councillor conscience, sense of

1770
01:10:30,000 --> 01:10:33,000
responsibility, mission, and --

1771
01:10:33,000 --> 01:10:36,000
I urge you to consider these

1772
01:10:36,000 --> 01:10:37,000
values as you make your

1773
01:10:37,000 --> 01:10:39,000
decision. Thank you.

1774
01:10:39,000 --> 01:10:40,000
>> Thank you very much.

1775
01:10:40,000 --> 01:10:43,000
[Applause]

1776
01:10:46,000 --> 01:10:48,000
>> Hi, I was just wondering if

1777
01:10:48,000 --> 01:10:49,000
there's any other residential

1778
01:10:49,000 --> 01:10:51,000
area in Beaconsfield that has so

1779
01:10:51,000 --> 01:10:53,000
many by-laws change towards

1780
01:10:53,000 --> 01:10:55,000
project?

1781
01:10:55,000 --> 01:10:56,000
>> Yes, Adamus.

1782
01:10:56,000 --> 01:10:57,000
[Laughter]

1783
01:10:57,000 --> 01:10:59,000
>> That's it? The

1784
01:10:59,000 --> 01:11:02,060
>> In fact, the Adamus project

1785
01:11:02,060 --> 01:11:04,060
is more massive than the one

1786
01:11:04,060 --> 01:11:05,060
that's there.

1787
01:11:05,060 --> 01:11:07,060
>> Does the city consider it it

1788
01:11:07,060 --> 01:11:08,060
success?

1789
01:11:08,060 --> 01:11:09,060
>> Eventually, it's completed

1790
01:11:09,060 --> 01:11:14,060
the way it was proposed to.

1791
01:11:14,060 --> 01:11:15,060
Unfortunately, we have another

1792
01:11:15,060 --> 01:11:18,060
issue with that house, because

1793
01:11:18,060 --> 01:11:20,060
obviously the project should

1794
01:11:20,060 --> 01:11:23,060
have been done a long time ago.

1795
01:11:23,060 --> 01:11:25,060
But that project is much more

1796
01:11:25,060 --> 01:11:29,060
massive than the one on elm.

1797
01:11:29,060 --> 01:11:32,060
>> Fair enough. Now, the

1798
01:11:32,060 --> 01:11:33,060
motivation behind all of these

1799
01:11:33,060 --> 01:11:34,060
adjustments, because I'm

1800
01:11:34,060 --> 01:11:36,060
talking, like, those are big

1801
01:11:36,060 --> 01:11:38,060
projects, like elm is going to

1802
01:11:38,060 --> 01:11:41,060
be. But as a resident of

1803
01:11:41,060 --> 01:11:42,060
Beaconsfield, I've had to

1804
01:11:42,060 --> 01:11:43,060
constantly go back to the city

1805
01:11:43,060 --> 01:11:44,060
for different permits and bylaws

1806
01:11:44,060 --> 01:11:47,060
and making sure, like, your

1807
01:11:47,060 --> 01:11:49,060
fence here has to be lowered by

1808
01:11:49,060 --> 01:11:50,060
a couple inches or your paint is

1809
01:11:50,060 --> 01:11:52,060
white, I want to change it to

1810
01:11:52,060 --> 01:11:53,060
off-white, no, you can't do

1811
01:11:53,060 --> 01:11:55,060
that. There's been a lot of back

1812
01:11:55,060 --> 01:11:57,060
and forth about little things.

1813
01:11:57,060 --> 01:11:59,060
>> Keep in mind that here we are

1814
01:11:59,060 --> 01:12:03,020
going from a commercial sewn or

1815
01:12:04,020 --> 01:12:07,020
commercial to a residential. And

1816
01:12:07,020 --> 01:12:09,020
that requires a lot of changes

1817
01:12:09,020 --> 01:12:12,020
from what it was before. The

1818
01:12:12,020 --> 01:12:13,020
vocation is completely

1819
01:12:13,020 --> 01:12:18,020
different. So that's why we need

1820
01:12:18,020 --> 01:12:20,020
to allow a lot of changes in the

1821
01:12:20,020 --> 01:12:23,020
PPCMOI to be able to accommodate

1822
01:12:23,020 --> 01:12:24,020
a presidential.

1823
01:12:24,020 --> 01:12:26,020
>> Do you feel like the by-laws

1824
01:12:26,020 --> 01:12:28,020
for everybody should be adjusted

1825
01:12:28,020 --> 01:12:31,020
and then? No. So just for

1826
01:12:31,020 --> 01:12:32,020
certain cases we will have

1827
01:12:32,020 --> 01:12:35,020
exceptions? Okay. And then my

1828
01:12:35,020 --> 01:12:37,020
final question is we did a

1829
01:12:37,020 --> 01:12:41,020
traffic study. Did anyone on the

1830
01:12:42,020 --> 01:12:44,020
City team notify you that there

1831
01:12:44,020 --> 01:12:46,020
was a public school strike going

1832
01:12:46,020 --> 01:12:49,020
on during the time that it was

1833
01:12:49,020 --> 01:12:53,020
being -- nobody brought this up?

1834
01:12:54,020 --> 01:12:55,020
>> Yes.

1835
01:12:55,020 --> 01:12:56,020
>> Yeah.

1836
01:12:56,020 --> 01:12:58,020
>> Sorry, what was that?

1837
01:12:58,020 --> 01:12:59,020
>> What was --

1838
01:12:59,020 --> 01:13:01,080
[Laughter]

1839
01:13:01,080 --> 01:13:02,080
Shot

1840
01:13:02,080 --> 01:13:04,080
>> Yeah, we know that it was

1841
01:13:04,080 --> 01:13:05,080
done, there were some days where

1842
01:13:05,080 --> 01:13:06,080
there are some strikes, there

1843
01:13:06,080 --> 01:13:07,080
was a day where there's a

1844
01:13:07,080 --> 01:13:09,080
snowstorm, another with a water

1845
01:13:09,080 --> 01:13:10,080
break. So there's always a

1846
01:13:10,080 --> 01:13:11,080
reason.

1847
01:13:11,080 --> 01:13:12,080
>> I think it was a week.

1848
01:13:12,080 --> 01:13:14,080
>> It was a seven-week strike.

1849
01:13:14,080 --> 01:13:17,080
>> We cannot control what other

1850
01:13:17,080 --> 01:13:19,080
third parties do, if they go on

1851
01:13:19,080 --> 01:13:22,080
strike or not. We were asked to

1852
01:13:22,080 --> 01:13:24,080
produce a new -- study, we

1853
01:13:24,080 --> 01:13:25,080
started it. There was a strike,

1854
01:13:25,080 --> 01:13:27,080
so there is a little less

1855
01:13:27,080 --> 01:13:29,080
traffic. But at the end of the

1856
01:13:29,080 --> 01:13:32,080
day, I don't think that will

1857
01:13:32,080 --> 01:13:36,080
have changed the issue of the

1858
01:13:37,080 --> 01:13:38,080
recommendations, or the analysis

1859
01:13:38,080 --> 01:13:41,080
that was done by the experts.

1860
01:13:41,080 --> 01:13:45,080
They did seven intersections.

1861
01:13:45,080 --> 01:13:48,080
How many days, do you remember?

1862
01:13:48,080 --> 01:13:49,080
[Inaudible]

1863
01:13:49,080 --> 01:13:51,080
Three days, but it wasn't during

1864
01:13:51,080 --> 01:13:53,080
the strike. It was planned to be

1865
01:13:53,080 --> 01:13:56,080
done in the first week -- the

1866
01:13:56,080 --> 01:13:59,080
last week of November, but it's

1867
01:13:59,080 --> 01:14:01,040
been moved so they could have

1868
01:14:01,040 --> 01:14:04,040
the right count. So it wasn't

1869
01:14:04,040 --> 01:14:07,040
during the strike. Some schools

1870
01:14:07,040 --> 01:14:08,040
in Beaconsfield were still in

1871
01:14:08,040 --> 01:14:10,040
strike, but not the English

1872
01:14:10,040 --> 01:14:12,040
school board. Some of the

1873
01:14:12,040 --> 01:14:13,040
schools on the north side. So

1874
01:14:13,040 --> 01:14:15,040
that's why it's been moved. But

1875
01:14:15,040 --> 01:14:18,040
it's been really -- we had the

1876
01:14:18,040 --> 01:14:20,040
moved because of that. We want

1877
01:14:20,040 --> 01:14:22,040
to make sure the numbers were

1878
01:14:22,040 --> 01:14:23,040
correct.

1879
01:14:23,040 --> 01:14:26,040
>> And this was -- traffic study

1880
01:14:26,040 --> 01:14:27,040
--

1881
01:14:27,040 --> 01:14:28,040
>> For done.

1882
01:14:28,040 --> 01:14:31,040
>> So we did to. The residents

1883
01:14:31,040 --> 01:14:33,040
did not like it. And we did a

1884
01:14:33,040 --> 01:14:34,040
second one.

1885
01:14:34,040 --> 01:14:36,040
>> So, the first one suggested

1886
01:14:36,040 --> 01:14:38,040
that a sidewalk be built. Will

1887
01:14:38,040 --> 01:14:40,040
the City commit to building this

1888
01:14:40,040 --> 01:14:41,040
sidewalk before the de

1889
01:14:41,040 --> 01:14:43,040
construction or demolition?

1890
01:14:43,040 --> 01:14:46,040
>> The first one -- people that

1891
01:14:46,040 --> 01:14:50,040
we had ignored would ignore

1892
01:14:50,040 --> 01:14:51,040
Beaconsfield station.

1893
01:14:51,040 --> 01:14:53,040
>> Correct.

1894
01:14:53,040 --> 01:14:54,040
>> Actually, it's halfway

1895
01:14:54,040 --> 01:14:57,040
between the two. So it has an

1896
01:14:57,040 --> 01:14:59,040
impact on whether it will be on

1897
01:14:59,040 --> 01:15:01,000
Beaconsfield station or --

1898
01:15:01,000 --> 01:15:02,000
station.

1899
01:15:02,000 --> 01:15:03,000
>> Sure, but the question was

1900
01:15:03,000 --> 01:15:07,000
about the sidewalk. Okay, it

1901
01:15:07,000 --> 01:15:08,000
will be built before the

1902
01:15:08,000 --> 01:15:09,000
demolition?

1903
01:15:09,000 --> 01:15:11,000
>> We are going to do a

1904
01:15:11,000 --> 01:15:12,000
sidewalk. Yeah, it's part of the

1905
01:15:12,000 --> 01:15:13,000
project.

1906
01:15:13,000 --> 01:15:14,000
>> Sorry, I'm getting two

1907
01:15:14,000 --> 01:15:15,000
different answers. Will it be

1908
01:15:15,000 --> 01:15:17,000
done before the demolition?

1909
01:15:17,000 --> 01:15:18,000
>> I don't remember if it's

1910
01:15:18,000 --> 01:15:19,000
before the demolition, that is

1911
01:15:19,000 --> 01:15:23,000
part of the overall project.

1912
01:15:24,000 --> 01:15:26,000
>> Usually, you don't want to do

1913
01:15:26,000 --> 01:15:27,000
before.

1914
01:15:27,000 --> 01:15:29,000
>> Usually, infrastructure work

1915
01:15:29,000 --> 01:15:32,000
can occur like that, it's done

1916
01:15:32,000 --> 01:15:33,000
after. Because of all the

1917
01:15:33,000 --> 01:15:34,000
construction that's got to be

1918
01:15:34,000 --> 01:15:36,000
done, like for other projects,

1919
01:15:36,000 --> 01:15:40,000
even for a single house. They do

1920
01:15:40,000 --> 01:15:42,000
break the sidewalk. So it would

1921
01:15:42,000 --> 01:15:44,000
be a good decision to have them

1922
01:15:44,000 --> 01:15:46,000
make the sidewalk beforehand.

1923
01:15:46,000 --> 01:15:49,000
>> I understand that. But for

1924
01:15:49,000 --> 01:15:50,000
the daycare and all the kids and

1925
01:15:50,000 --> 01:15:52,000
just general population, when

1926
01:15:52,000 --> 01:15:55,000
you have large trucks moving all

1927
01:15:55,000 --> 01:15:56,000
the debris, wouldn't it make

1928
01:15:56,000 --> 01:16:00,060
sense to have some protected

1929
01:16:00,060 --> 01:16:01,060
area that they could walk to

1930
01:16:01,060 --> 01:16:02,060
parks?

1931
01:16:02,060 --> 01:16:04,060
>> I think we can take note of

1932
01:16:04,060 --> 01:16:05,060
your comment.

1933
01:16:05,060 --> 01:16:06,060
>> We will take a look at it,

1934
01:16:06,060 --> 01:16:09,060
thank you.

1935
01:16:09,060 --> 01:16:10,060
>> One public work --

1936
01:16:10,060 --> 01:16:11,060
>> Thank you.

1937
01:16:11,060 --> 01:16:14,060
>> I think you are the last one?

1938
01:16:14,060 --> 01:16:17,060
>> We are together. We are from

1939
01:16:17,060 --> 01:16:18,060
Elm plaza. We both have

1940
01:16:18,060 --> 01:16:21,060
businesses there. My name is

1941
01:16:21,060 --> 01:16:22,060
Tamara, I own revolution hair

1942
01:16:22,060 --> 01:16:23,060
studio.

1943
01:16:23,060 --> 01:16:24,060
>> I work at the animal

1944
01:16:24,060 --> 01:16:25,060
hospital.

1945
01:16:25,060 --> 01:16:26,060
>> I've been unattended for 30

1946
01:16:26,060 --> 01:16:27,060
years with my mom and my uncle.

1947
01:16:27,060 --> 01:16:29,060
We've been paying taxes in the

1948
01:16:29,060 --> 01:16:31,060
plaza since the 80s. And we've

1949
01:16:31,060 --> 01:16:33,060
seen this go on a few times over

1950
01:16:33,060 --> 01:16:35,060
the years. And here we are

1951
01:16:35,060 --> 01:16:37,060
again. My concern is the plaza

1952
01:16:37,060 --> 01:16:39,060
is falling apart, and the safety

1953
01:16:39,060 --> 01:16:42,060
of the plaza is an issue. My

1954
01:16:42,060 --> 01:16:43,060
clients do not feel safe coming

1955
01:16:43,060 --> 01:16:46,060
in. I have clients from one year

1956
01:16:46,060 --> 01:16:47,060
old to sum that are in their

1957
01:16:47,060 --> 01:16:50,060
90s. The older ones -- one of

1958
01:16:50,060 --> 01:16:51,060
them has even stop driving, and

1959
01:16:51,060 --> 01:16:54,060
she takes a taxi, because she is

1960
01:16:54,060 --> 01:16:55,060
too scared to walk in the

1961
01:16:55,060 --> 01:16:57,060
parking lot to the salon. The

1962
01:16:57,060 --> 01:16:59,060
bricks are falling off, not just

1963
01:16:59,060 --> 01:17:00,020
on one pillow or, they're all

1964
01:17:00,020 --> 01:17:02,020
starting to fall on the floor.

1965
01:17:02,020 --> 01:17:04,020
There are potholes everywhere.

1966
01:17:04,020 --> 01:17:05,020
The access ramp for the

1967
01:17:05,020 --> 01:17:06,020
wheelchair is full of potholes

1968
01:17:06,020 --> 01:17:09,020
and rocks. And these sort caps

1969
01:17:09,020 --> 01:17:11,020
are off. There were no lights in

1970
01:17:11,020 --> 01:17:13,020
the plaza from the fall until

1971
01:17:13,020 --> 01:17:15,020
the end of the winter, when the

1972
01:17:15,020 --> 01:17:17,020
days started getting longer. Not

1973
01:17:17,020 --> 01:17:19,020
one light. My employee fell, she

1974
01:17:19,020 --> 01:17:20,020
hurt her knee, she could not

1975
01:17:20,020 --> 01:17:24,020
come to work for a few days. I

1976
01:17:24,020 --> 01:17:25,020
mean, how is this acceptable?

1977
01:17:25,020 --> 01:17:27,020
And if this is going on now, how

1978
01:17:27,020 --> 01:17:29,020
is it gonna be safe well he is

1979
01:17:29,020 --> 01:17:31,020
building? What am I going to do

1980
01:17:31,020 --> 01:17:33,020
to -- what is he going to do to

1981
01:17:33,020 --> 01:17:34,020
ensure the safety of the tenants

1982
01:17:34,020 --> 01:17:35,020
that are still there while he is

1983
01:17:35,020 --> 01:17:37,020
doing his construction? I don't

1984
01:17:37,020 --> 01:17:38,020
understand how it is going to

1985
01:17:38,020 --> 01:17:39,020
work.

1986
01:17:39,020 --> 01:17:40,020
>> So I'll just add to that

1987
01:17:40,020 --> 01:17:42,020
before, just to reiterate, that

1988
01:17:42,020 --> 01:17:44,020
our question to Council, really

1989
01:17:44,020 --> 01:17:46,020
our comment to Council and the

1990
01:17:46,020 --> 01:17:48,020
citizens of Beaconsfield, is

1991
01:17:48,020 --> 01:17:49,020
that our experience when the

1992
01:17:49,020 --> 01:17:51,020
promoter has not been a positive

1993
01:17:51,020 --> 01:17:53,020
one for the past 1.5 years that

1994
01:17:53,020 --> 01:17:56,020
we've been working with them.

1995
01:17:56,020 --> 01:17:58,020
And as a result, we are very

1996
01:17:58,020 --> 01:18:00,080
concerned about the project in

1997
01:18:00,080 --> 01:18:01,080
itself and whether or not it

1998
01:18:01,080 --> 01:18:04,080
will be safe, whether he will be

1999
01:18:04,080 --> 01:18:06,080
or they will be ensuring that

2000
01:18:06,080 --> 01:18:08,080
things are done on time, that

2001
01:18:08,080 --> 01:18:11,080
the streets are safe, that --

2002
01:18:11,080 --> 01:18:12,080
and we understand, we don't

2003
01:18:12,080 --> 01:18:14,080
really have the same anyways,

2004
01:18:14,080 --> 01:18:16,080
because we are renters. We don't

2005
01:18:16,080 --> 01:18:18,080
own the property. But our

2006
01:18:18,080 --> 01:18:22,080
clients come to us, their pets,

2007
01:18:22,080 --> 01:18:23,080
and their safety is important to

2008
01:18:23,080 --> 01:18:25,080
us, as is the ability for us to

2009
01:18:25,080 --> 01:18:28,080
continue to have our businesses

2010
01:18:28,080 --> 01:18:29,080
actually provide a service to

2011
01:18:29,080 --> 01:18:31,080
this community. So we are asking

2012
01:18:31,080 --> 01:18:33,080
that Council consider that

2013
01:18:33,080 --> 01:18:34,080
history that we have this

2014
01:18:34,080 --> 01:18:36,080
particular promoter when you are

2015
01:18:36,080 --> 01:18:38,080
coming to vote today, as well to

2016
01:18:38,080 --> 01:18:39,080
the citizens if it does go to a

2017
01:18:39,080 --> 01:18:41,080
yes to please support us, as

2018
01:18:41,080 --> 01:18:43,080
well as the daycare, which will

2019
01:18:43,080 --> 01:18:45,080
be very highly affected in the

2020
01:18:45,080 --> 01:18:46,080
coming years.

2021
01:18:46,080 --> 01:18:49,080
>> I understand that you are

2022
01:18:49,080 --> 01:18:50,080
going to --

2023
01:18:50,080 --> 01:18:51,080
[Applause]

2024
01:18:51,080 --> 01:18:54,080
>> Continue to operate with a

2025
01:18:54,080 --> 01:18:56,080
new -- after the development,

2026
01:18:56,080 --> 01:18:58,080
there will be room for you to

2027
01:18:58,080 --> 01:19:00,040
continue to operate. Is that

2028
01:19:00,040 --> 01:19:01,040
correct?

2029
01:19:01,040 --> 01:19:02,040
>> Well, what the developer or

2030
01:19:02,040 --> 01:19:04,040
promoted says and what he says

2031
01:19:04,040 --> 01:19:05,040
to us and what we see in these

2032
01:19:05,040 --> 01:19:07,040
plans that have been passed her

2033
01:19:07,040 --> 01:19:10,040
two very different things.

2034
01:19:10,040 --> 01:19:12,040
>> And in the meantime, what

2035
01:19:12,040 --> 01:19:14,040
about in the meantime, we have a

2036
01:19:14,040 --> 01:19:15,040
lease.

2037
01:19:15,040 --> 01:19:18,040
>> This is something we --

2038
01:19:18,040 --> 01:19:19,040
>> I understand.

2039
01:19:19,040 --> 01:19:21,040
>> We can't tell the promoter

2040
01:19:21,040 --> 01:19:22,040
what to do.

2041
01:19:22,040 --> 01:19:23,040
>> Like there's some safety,

2042
01:19:23,040 --> 01:19:26,040
like has to follow certain --

2043
01:19:26,040 --> 01:19:27,040
have yet a talk with him?

2044
01:19:27,040 --> 01:19:29,040
>> Yes, I have.

2045
01:19:29,040 --> 01:19:32,040
>> We have had to send leaguer

2046
01:19:32,040 --> 01:19:34,040
legal letters to him about

2047
01:19:34,040 --> 01:19:35,040
safety at our place.

2048
01:19:35,040 --> 01:19:37,040
>> -- come to the city, that's

2049
01:19:37,040 --> 01:19:39,040
what I was recommended to do. So

2050
01:19:39,040 --> 01:19:40,040
I just don't know what to do

2051
01:19:40,040 --> 01:19:44,040
right now, because the sword

2052
01:19:45,040 --> 01:19:47,040
caps are not on the whole, like,

2053
01:19:47,040 --> 01:19:49,040
the cars are driving in and

2054
01:19:49,040 --> 01:19:53,040
following in the sewer.

2055
01:19:53,040 --> 01:19:54,040
>> Well, I don't really have any

2056
01:19:54,040 --> 01:19:56,040
answers for you. I know that a

2057
01:19:56,040 --> 01:19:57,040
lot of people have moved out of

2058
01:19:57,040 --> 01:19:58,040
there.

2059
01:19:58,040 --> 01:19:59,040
>> I know, but I have been there

2060
01:19:59,040 --> 01:20:01,000
for 38 years, I can just up and

2061
01:20:01,000 --> 01:20:02,000
leave.

2062
01:20:02,000 --> 01:20:04,000
>> Yeah, and you are what I call

2063
01:20:04,000 --> 01:20:07,000
a destination business, will

2064
01:20:07,000 --> 01:20:10,000
survive this development because

2065
01:20:10,000 --> 01:20:13,000
that's the type of business that

2066
01:20:13,000 --> 01:20:16,000
if he is smart, as a developer,

2067
01:20:16,000 --> 01:20:19,000
he will make sure that he keeps

2068
01:20:19,000 --> 01:20:22,000
you happy until he's able.

2069
01:20:22,000 --> 01:20:23,000
>> So, far yeah.

2070
01:20:23,000 --> 01:20:25,000
>> I can't talk for him.

2071
01:20:25,000 --> 01:20:30,000
>> Yeah, already.

2072
01:20:33,000 --> 01:20:35,000
>> Okay, we will now -- we've

2073
01:20:35,000 --> 01:20:38,000
been into it for 1.5 hours, an

2074
01:20:38,000 --> 01:20:39,000
hour 20 minutes, so we will now

2075
01:20:39,000 --> 01:20:42,000
move on to the agenda.

2076
01:20:51,000 --> 01:20:53,000
Approbation du procès-verbal de

2077
01:20:53,000 --> 01:20:54,000
la séance ordinaire du Conseil

2078
01:20:54,000 --> 01:20:55,000
de la Ville de Beaconsfield du

2079
01:20:55,000 --> 01:20:56,000
26 février 2024.

2080
01:20:56,000 --> 01:20:57,000
- Je propose.

2081
01:20:57,000 --> 01:20:58,000
- J'appuie.

2082
01:20:58,000 --> 01:20:59,000
- En faveur.

2083
01:20:59,000 --> 01:21:00,060
- Approval of the minutes à

2084
01:21:00,060 --> 01:21:01,060
l'unamimité. of the City of

2085
01:21:01,060 --> 01:21:02,060
Beaconsfield's special Council

2086
01:21:02,060 --> 01:21:03,060
meeting of March 11, 2024, at

2087
01:21:03,060 --> 01:21:06,060
5:30 p.m.

2088
01:21:06,060 --> 01:21:07,060
>> Opposed.

2089
01:21:07,060 --> 01:21:08,060
>> I second.

2090
01:21:08,060 --> 01:21:10,060
>> All in favour?

2091
01:21:10,060 --> 01:21:13,060
- À l'unamimité. Octroi du

2092
01:21:13,060 --> 01:21:14,060
contrat 599-23-GC concernant la

2093
01:21:14,060 --> 01:21:15,060
réhabilitation de la jetée

2094
01:21:15,060 --> 01:21:16,060
Centennial au plus bas

2095
01:21:16,060 --> 01:21:18,060
soumissionnaire conforme, soit

2096
01:21:18,060 --> 01:21:19,060
Pronex Excavation inc., pour la

2097
01:21:19,060 --> 01:21:22,060
somme de 3 259 946,97 $, toutes

2098
01:21:22,060 --> 01:21:27,060
taxes incluses.

2099
01:21:28,060 --> 01:21:31,060
- Je propose.

2100
01:21:41,060 --> 01:21:43,060
>> Motion carried. Awarding of

2101
01:21:43,060 --> 01:21:46,060
contract 650-24-GC for the

2102
01:21:46,060 --> 01:21:47,060
concrete sidewalk repair to the

2103
01:21:47,060 --> 01:21:48,060
lowest conforming bidder, Les

2104
01:21:48,060 --> 01:21:49,060
Entreprises Ventec Inc., in the

2105
01:21:49,060 --> 01:21:54,060
amount of $161,079.98, all taxes

2106
01:21:57,060 --> 01:22:00,020
included

2107
01:22:00,020 --> 01:22:01,020
>> Proposed.

2108
01:22:01,020 --> 01:22:03,020
>> Seconded.

2109
01:22:03,020 --> 01:22:05,020
>> In favour? Unanimous.

2110
01:22:05,020 --> 01:22:08,020
- Merci. Octroi du contrat

2111
01:22:08,020 --> 01:22:09,020
650-24-GC concernant la

2112
01:22:09,020 --> 01:22:10,020
réfection des trottoirs au plus

2113
01:22:10,020 --> 01:22:12,020
bas soumissionnaire conforme,

2114
01:22:12,020 --> 01:22:13,020
soit Les Entreprises Ventec

2115
01:22:13,020 --> 01:22:15,020
inc., pour la somme de

2116
01:22:15,020 --> 01:22:17,020
161 079,98 $, toutes taxes

2117
01:22:17,020 --> 01:22:22,020
incluses.

2118
01:22:23,020 --> 01:22:25,020
(---)

2119
01:22:25,020 --> 01:22:26,020
Insituform Technologies limitée,

2120
01:22:26,020 --> 01:22:27,020
pour la somme de 423 423,00 $,

2121
01:22:27,020 --> 01:22:29,020
toutes taxes incluses.

2122
01:22:29,020 --> 01:22:31,020
- À l'unamimité.. Awarding of

2123
01:22:31,020 --> 01:22:32,020
contract TP 2024-01 for the

2124
01:22:32,020 --> 01:22:35,020
supply and planting of trees in

2125
01:22:35,020 --> 01:22:36,020
parks and on municipal rights of

2126
01:22:36,020 --> 01:22:37,020
way in the spring of 2024 to the

2127
01:22:37,020 --> 01:22:41,020
lowest conforming bidder,

2128
01:22:42,020 --> 01:22:43,020
Terrassement Technick, in the

2129
01:22:43,020 --> 01:22:45,020
amount of $152 745,44, all taxes

2130
01:22:45,020 --> 01:22:49,020
included

2131
01:22:50,020 --> 01:22:53,020
.

2132
01:22:53,020 --> 01:22:54,020
>> I propose.

2133
01:22:54,020 --> 01:22:56,020
>> I

2134
01:22:56,020 --> 01:22:58,020
- En faveur. Second. In

2135
01:22:58,020 --> 01:23:01,080
- Favour? À l'unamimité.

2136
01:23:01,080 --> 01:23:03,080
Renouvellement du contrat TP

2137
01:23:03,080 --> 01:23:05,080
2018-12 pour la collecte et le

2138
01:23:05,080 --> 01:23:06,080
transport des matières

2139
01:23:06,080 --> 01:23:08,080
recyclables pour une année, du

2140
01:23:08,080 --> 01:23:10,080
1er avril 2024 au 31 mars 2025,

2141
01:23:10,080 --> 01:23:11,080
avec Services Ricova inc. au

2142
01:23:11,080 --> 01:23:16,080
coût approximatif de 386 198 $,

2143
01:23:17,080 --> 01:23:21,080
toutes taxes incluses.

2144
01:23:22,080 --> 01:23:26,080
>> Second. In favour? À

2145
01:23:26,080 --> 01:23:27,080
l'unamimité. Mandate to the

2146
01:23:27,080 --> 01:23:28,080
Union des municipalités du

2147
01:23:28,080 --> 01:23:29,080
Québec

2148
01:23:29,080 --> 01:23:30,080
(UMQ)

2149
01:23:30,080 --> 01:23:31,080
with regard to the group for the

2150
01:23:31,080 --> 01:23:33,080
purchase in common of liability

2151
01:23:33,080 --> 01:23:35,080
insurance for skateboard parks,

2152
01:23:35,080 --> 01:23:40,080
BMX park tracks and similar

2153
01:23:41,080 --> 01:23:43,080
installations for 2024 to 2029.

2154
01:23:43,080 --> 01:23:47,080
>> I propose.

2155
01:23:47,080 --> 01:23:51,080
>> I, in favour. À l'unamimité.

2156
01:23:51,080 --> 01:23:52,080
Approbation de la liste des

2157
01:23:52,080 --> 01:23:54,080
comptes à payer au 25 mars 2024

2158
01:23:54,080 --> 01:23:55,080
et de la liste des paiements

2159
01:23:55,080 --> 01:23:56,080
préautorisés pour la période du

2160
01:23:56,080 --> 01:23:58,080
15 février 2024 au 25 février

2161
01:23:58,080 --> 01:24:00,040
2024 et du 27 février 2024 au 13

2162
01:24:00,040 --> 01:24:02,040
mars 2024, pour un déboursé

2163
01:24:02,040 --> 01:24:05,040
total de 17 584 462,29 $.

2164
01:24:12,040 --> 01:24:13,040
- Malheureusement, je n'ai pas

2165
01:24:13,040 --> 01:24:16,040
tous les détails du 17 millions

2166
01:24:16,040 --> 01:24:19,040
comme normalement... mais je

2167
01:24:19,040 --> 01:24:22,040
peux vous mentionner que ça

2168
01:24:22,040 --> 01:24:25,040
inclut les paiements des

2169
01:24:25,040 --> 01:24:26,040
quote-part pour la deuxième

2170
01:24:26,040 --> 01:24:31,040
moitié de l'année. En fait, la

2171
01:24:31,040 --> 01:24:32,040
première moitié de la fin de

2172
01:24:32,040 --> 01:24:35,040
l'année, c'est ça? Et nous

2173
01:24:35,040 --> 01:24:40,040
allons payer sous protêt ses

2174
01:24:40,040 --> 01:24:43,040
quotes-parts. La plupart d'entre

2175
01:24:43,040 --> 01:24:46,040
vous sont au courant that we...

2176
01:24:46,040 --> 01:24:50,040
have a lawsuit against Montréal

2177
01:24:50,040 --> 01:24:53,040
on the sharing of expenses and

2178
01:24:53,040 --> 01:24:55,040
the formula. So we are

2179
01:24:55,040 --> 01:24:59,040
continuing to pay the -- but we

2180
01:24:59,040 --> 01:25:01,000
are paying that under protest

2181
01:25:01,000 --> 01:25:03,000
hoping that eventually it will

2182
01:25:03,000 --> 01:25:06,000
all be settled in court.

2183
01:25:24,000 --> 01:25:25,000
Deposit of the Treasurer's

2184
01:25:25,000 --> 01:25:26,000
transactions report in

2185
01:25:26,000 --> 01:25:27,000
compliance with section 513 of

2186
01:25:27,000 --> 01:25:28,000
an Act respecting elections and

2187
01:25:28,000 --> 01:25:32,000
referendums in municipalities.

2188
01:25:33,000 --> 01:25:37,000
Il s'agit d'un dépôt.

2189
01:25:38,000 --> 01:25:39,000
Dépôt de la liste des

2190
01:25:39,000 --> 01:25:40,000
remboursements des dépenses de

2191
01:25:40,000 --> 01:25:41,000
recherche et de soutien des

2192
01:25:41,000 --> 01:25:42,000
conseillers autorisés par la

2193
01:25:42,000 --> 01:25:43,000
Ville de Beaconsfield pendant

2194
01:25:43,000 --> 01:25:44,000
l'exercice financier 2023

2195
01:25:44,000 --> 01:25:45,000
conformément à l'article 31.5.5

2196
01:25:45,000 --> 01:25:46,000
de la Loi sur le traitement des

2197
01:25:46,000 --> 01:25:51,000
élus municipaux.

2198
01:25:51,000 --> 01:25:52,000
>> Approval of the -- lawn

2199
01:25:52,000 --> 01:25:53,000
bowling Club and the the City

2200
01:25:53,000 --> 01:25:54,000
for the Herb Linder Annex and

2201
01:25:54,000 --> 01:25:55,000
the lawn bowling greens for the

2202
01:25:55,000 --> 01:25:59,000
year 2024

2203
01:25:59,000 --> 01:26:00,060
>> I propose. In

2204
01:26:00,060 --> 01:26:04,060
- Favour? À l'unamimité. à

2205
01:26:04,060 --> 01:26:05,060
l'unamimité. Approbation d'un

2206
01:26:05,060 --> 01:26:06,060
appui financier de 500 $ à

2207
01:26:06,060 --> 01:26:07,060
Services à la Famille AMCAL pour

2208
01:26:07,060 --> 01:26:12,060
l'année 2024.

2209
01:26:12,060 --> 01:26:13,060
- En faveur.

2210
01:26:13,060 --> 01:26:17,060
- Approval of a $2,000 à

2211
01:26:17,060 --> 01:26:21,060
l'unamimité. contribution to

2212
01:26:21,060 --> 01:26:22,060
West Island community resource

2213
01:26:22,060 --> 01:26:25,060
center for the year 2024.

2214
01:26:25,060 --> 01:26:26,060
>> Opposed.

2215
01:26:26,060 --> 01:26:27,060
>> Second.

2216
01:26:27,060 --> 01:26:31,060
>> In favour. À l'unamimité.

2217
01:26:32,060 --> 01:26:33,060
Approbation d'un appui financier

2218
01:26:33,060 --> 01:26:34,060
de 1 000 $ à Centre de

2219
01:26:34,060 --> 01:26:35,060
ressources communautaires de

2220
01:26:35,060 --> 01:26:36,060
l'Ouestde-l'Île pour l'année

2221
01:26:36,060 --> 01:26:37,060
2024.

2222
01:26:37,060 --> 01:26:38,060
(---)

2223
01:26:38,060 --> 01:26:39,060
Approbation d'un appui financier

2224
01:26:39,060 --> 01:26:40,060
de 2 000 $ à NOVA

2225
01:26:40,060 --> 01:26:41,060
l'Ouest-de-l'Île pour l'année

2226
01:26:41,060 --> 01:26:42,060
2024 Approval of a $3,000.

2227
01:26:42,060 --> 01:26:43,060
- À l'unamimité. contribution to

2228
01:26:43,060 --> 01:26:44,060
West Island Association for the

2229
01:26:44,060 --> 01:26:45,060
Intellectually Handicapped for

2230
01:26:45,060 --> 01:26:49,060
the year 2024.

2231
01:26:49,060 --> 01:26:54,060
>> Proposed.

2232
01:26:57,060 --> 01:26:59,060
- Oui, j'appuie.

2233
01:26:59,060 --> 01:27:00,020
- En faveur.

2234
01:27:00,020 --> 01:27:02,020
(rires)

2235
01:27:02,020 --> 01:27:07,020
- À l'unamimité.

2236
01:27:08,020 --> 01:27:09,020
Approbation d'un appui financier

2237
01:27:09,020 --> 01:27:11,020
de 6 500 $ pour l'entretien

2238
01:27:11,020 --> 01:27:12,020
annuel des espaces verts entre

2239
01:27:12,020 --> 01:27:13,020
le Club de boulingrin de

2240
01:27:13,020 --> 01:27:15,020
Beaconsfield et la Ville de

2241
01:27:15,020 --> 01:27:19,020
Beaconsfield pour l'année 2024.

2242
01:27:19,020 --> 01:27:24,020
- Proposé.

2243
01:27:24,020 --> 01:27:27,020
- Approval of a financial à

2244
01:27:27,020 --> 01:27:28,020
l'unamimité. contribution of

2245
01:27:28,020 --> 01:27:30,020
$170,000 for renovations of the

2246
01:27:30,020 --> 01:27:31,020
Beacon Hill pool and

2247
01:27:31,020 --> 01:27:32,020
authorization to sign the

2248
01:27:32,020 --> 01:27:33,020
agreement between the City of

2249
01:27:33,020 --> 01:27:34,020
Beaconsfield and Beacon Hill

2250
01:27:34,020 --> 01:27:39,020
Swimming Pool Club.

2251
01:27:39,020 --> 01:27:40,020
>> Proposed.

2252
01:27:40,020 --> 01:27:41,020
>> Second.

2253
01:27:41,020 --> 01:27:44,020
>> In favour. À l'unamimité.

2254
01:27:44,020 --> 01:27:46,020
Ordonnance pour vendre les

2255
01:27:46,020 --> 01:27:47,020
immeubles comportant des soldes

2256
01:27:47,020 --> 01:27:48,020
de taxes impayées pour 2022 et

2257
01:27:48,020 --> 01:27:49,020
2023 aux enchères publiques et

2258
01:27:49,020 --> 01:27:51,020
dépôt par le trésorier de la

2259
01:27:51,020 --> 01:27:55,020
liste de ces immeubles.

2260
01:27:56,020 --> 01:27:57,020
- Proposé.

2261
01:27:57,020 --> 01:27:58,020
- Appuyé.

2262
01:27:58,020 --> 01:27:59,020
- En faveur.

2263
01:27:59,020 --> 01:28:01,080
- À l'unamimité. Filing and

2264
01:28:01,080 --> 01:28:03,080
notice of motion of Draft By-law

2265
01:28:03,080 --> 01:28:05,080
BEAC-153 entitled «  By-law

2266
01:28:05,080 --> 01:28:08,080
authorizing a loan of $3,392,077

2267
01:28:08,080 --> 01:28:12,080
for the rehabilitation of

2268
01:28:13,080 --> 01:28:16,080
Centennial jetty, 288

2269
01:28:16,080 --> 01:28:21,080
Beaconsfield, Beaconsfield  ».

2270
01:28:22,080 --> 01:28:23,080
It's a notice of motion.

2271
01:28:23,080 --> 01:28:25,080
>> I give the notice of motion.

2272
01:28:25,080 --> 01:28:30,080
>> Thank you but. Dépôt et avis

2273
01:28:32,080 --> 01:28:33,080
de motion du projet de Règlement

2274
01:28:33,080 --> 01:28:34,080
BEAC-159 intitulé «  Règlement

2275
01:28:34,080 --> 01:28:37,080
autorisant un emprunt de

2276
01:28:37,080 --> 01:28:38,080
1 149 113,18 $ pour des travaux

2277
01:28:38,080 --> 01:28:39,080
de construction pour le bassin

2278
01:28:39,080 --> 01:28:42,080
pluvial Tower et Elm  ».

2279
01:28:42,080 --> 01:28:43,080
- Je donne un avis de motion.

2280
01:28:43,080 --> 01:28:46,080
- Merci. Adoption of By-law

2281
01:28:46,080 --> 01:28:48,080
BEAC-157 entitled «  By-law

2282
01:28:48,080 --> 01:28:50,080
authorizing a loan of $1,332,260

2283
01:28:50,080 --> 01:28:55,080
for the structural

2284
01:28:58,080 --> 01:28:59,080
rehabilitation work of sanitary

2285
01:28:59,080 --> 01:29:01,040
sewer pipes for various streets,

2286
01:29:01,040 --> 01:29:04,040
as well as for the structural

2287
01:29:04,040 --> 01:29:06,040
rehabilitation work of water

2288
01:29:06,040 --> 01:29:09,040
mains for various streets. This

2289
01:29:16,040 --> 01:29:18,040
by-law is for a loan for

2290
01:29:18,040 --> 01:29:19,040
municipal infrastructures. There

2291
01:29:19,040 --> 01:29:21,040
is more registered to be held,

2292
01:29:21,040 --> 01:29:25,040
since it falls under -- cases of

2293
01:29:25,040 --> 01:29:26,040
loan bylaw, which we do not

2294
01:29:26,040 --> 01:29:27,040
require the approval of

2295
01:29:27,040 --> 01:29:29,040
qualified voters, as per the --

2296
01:29:29,040 --> 01:29:32,040
and it will be applied to the

2297
01:29:32,040 --> 01:29:36,040
whole territory of the city of

2298
01:29:36,040 --> 01:29:37,040
Beaconsfield.

2299
01:29:37,040 --> 01:29:41,040
>> I second.

2300
01:29:41,040 --> 01:29:42,040
- À l'unamimité.

2301
01:29:42,040 --> 01:29:45,040
- Oui.

2302
01:29:45,040 --> 01:29:46,040
- Dépôt par la greffière du

2303
01:29:46,040 --> 01:29:47,040
certificat relatif aux résultats

2304
01:29:47,040 --> 01:29:49,040
de la demande d'approbation

2305
01:29:49,040 --> 01:29:50,040
référendaire tenue le 19 et 20

2306
01:29:50,040 --> 01:29:52,040
mars 2024 concernant le

2307
01:29:52,040 --> 01:29:54,040
Règlement BEAC-160 intitulé «

2308
01:29:54,040 --> 01:29:55,040
Règlement autorisant un emprunt

2309
01:29:55,040 --> 01:29:59,040
de 2 333 040,35 $ pour des

2310
01:29:59,040 --> 01:30:00,000
honoraires professionnels

2311
01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:02,000
(ingénieurs et architectes)

2312
01:30:02,000 --> 01:30:03,000
pour la préparation des plans et

2313
01:30:03,000 --> 01:30:05,000
devis, concernant des travaux de

2314
01:30:05,000 --> 01:30:06,000
rénovation et mise aux normes du

2315
01:30:06,000 --> 01:30:08,000
Centre récréatif de Beaconsfield

2316
01:30:08,000 --> 01:30:11,000
». Le registre s'est tenu. Il y

2317
01:30:11,000 --> 01:30:16,000
a eu cinq signatures. Il y avait

2318
01:30:16,000 --> 01:30:19,000
1411 signatures requises pour

2319
01:30:19,000 --> 01:30:21,000
s'opposer aux règlements. Donc

2320
01:30:21,000 --> 01:30:22,000
le règlement est réputé pour

2321
01:30:22,000 --> 01:30:24,000
avoir été appuyé par les

2322
01:30:24,000 --> 01:30:25,000
personnes habiles à voter

2323
01:30:25,000 --> 01:30:26,000
puisqu'il n'y avait pas de

2324
01:30:26,000 --> 01:30:27,000
signature

2325
01:30:27,000 --> 01:30:28,000
(inaudible)

2326
01:30:28,000 --> 01:30:29,000
. C'est un dépôt. Request for a

2327
01:30:29,000 --> 01:30:30,000
review of the Demolition

2328
01:30:30,000 --> 01:30:31,000
Committee's decision of February

2329
01:30:31,000 --> 01:30:32,000
13, 2024, pertaining to the

2330
01:30:32,000 --> 01:30:34,000
building located at 524

2331
01:30:34,000 --> 01:30:39,000
Rockhill. This is to revise the

2332
01:30:42,000 --> 01:30:46,000
committee's decision taken on

2333
01:30:46,000 --> 01:30:47,000
February 13th 2024, and approve

2334
01:30:47,000 --> 01:30:48,000
the application for a

2335
01:30:48,000 --> 01:30:50,000
certificate of authorization to

2336
01:30:50,000 --> 01:30:52,000
demolish the building.

2337
01:30:52,000 --> 01:30:56,000
>> All in favour?

2338
01:30:56,000 --> 01:30:57,000
>> Who is proposing?

2339
01:30:57,000 --> 01:30:58,000
[Inaudible]

2340
01:30:58,000 --> 01:31:00,060
>> I'm seconding.

2341
01:31:00,060 --> 01:31:05,060
>> All in favour? All against?

2342
01:31:07,060 --> 01:31:08,060
>> Motion carried.

2343
01:31:08,060 --> 01:31:09,060
>> So, it's carried, yeah.

2344
01:31:09,060 --> 01:31:11,060
[Inaudible]

2345
01:31:12,060 --> 01:31:13,060
>> Yes.

2346
01:31:13,060 --> 01:31:16,060
>> Oh, dear. I can't --

2347
01:31:16,060 --> 01:31:18,060
>> Listen, this is not the time

2348
01:31:18,060 --> 01:31:19,060
to interview.

2349
01:31:19,060 --> 01:31:22,060
[Inaudible]

2350
01:31:22,060 --> 01:31:23,060
>>

2351
01:31:23,060 --> 01:31:26,060
- No. Non.

2352
01:31:26,060 --> 01:31:27,060
>> I will be visiting my family

2353
01:31:27,060 --> 01:31:29,060
[Inaudible]

2354
01:31:31,060 --> 01:31:32,060
- Demande d'approbation d'un

2355
01:31:32,060 --> 01:31:33,060
deuxième projet particulier de

2356
01:31:33,060 --> 01:31:34,060
construction, de modification ou

2357
01:31:34,060 --> 01:31:35,060
d'occupation d'un immeuble

2358
01:31:35,060 --> 01:31:36,060
(PPCMOI)

2359
01:31:36,060 --> 01:31:38,060
situé au 275, Elm, Beaconsfield,

2360
01:31:38,060 --> 01:31:42,060
avec changements,

2361
01:31:43,060 --> 01:31:44,060
(lots projetés 6 555 296 et 6

2362
01:31:44,060 --> 01:31:45,060
555 297 du cadastre du Québec)

2363
01:31:45,060 --> 01:31:47,060
dans la zone C330 du Règlement

2364
01:31:47,060 --> 01:31:48,060
de zonage 720

2365
01:31:48,060 --> 01:31:50,060
(Projet PP-12-1)

2366
01:31:50,060 --> 01:31:55,060
. La recommandation du CCU est

2367
01:31:56,060 --> 01:31:58,060
approuvé, ce serait selon les

2368
01:31:58,060 --> 01:31:59,060
plans d'architecture daté du 28

2369
01:31:59,060 --> 01:32:00,020
novembre 2023.

2370
01:32:00,020 --> 01:32:02,020
>>

2371
01:32:02,020 --> 01:32:04,020
- Okay -- O.K.. Alors, en

2372
01:32:04,020 --> 01:32:08,020
faveur? Propose, all proposed

2373
01:32:08,020 --> 01:32:11,020
law.

2374
01:32:11,020 --> 01:32:15,020
- Je propose.

2375
01:32:15,020 --> 01:32:16,020
- Qui seconde?

2376
01:32:16,020 --> 01:32:17,020
- J'appuie.

2377
01:32:17,020 --> 01:32:21,020
- En faveur?

2378
01:32:21,020 --> 01:32:26,020
- Contre? Trois. Alors moi, je

2379
01:32:27,020 --> 01:32:29,020
vais voter... comme c'est mon

2380
01:32:29,020 --> 01:32:33,020
vote, je vais voter pour. And I

2381
01:32:33,020 --> 01:32:36,020
want to read a statement that I

2382
01:32:36,020 --> 01:32:38,020
prepared to explain my vote. I

2383
01:32:38,020 --> 01:32:42,020
would like to specify that

2384
01:32:42,020 --> 01:32:43,020
tonight we are approving these

2385
01:32:43,020 --> 01:32:45,020
specific construction

2386
01:32:45,020 --> 01:32:47,020
authorization or occupancy

2387
01:32:47,020 --> 01:32:49,020
proposal for an immovable,

2388
01:32:49,020 --> 01:32:53,020
commonly referred to as PPCMOI,

2389
01:32:54,020 --> 01:32:56,020
for 275 Elm plaza, as

2390
01:32:56,020 --> 01:32:59,020
recommended to Council by the

2391
01:32:59,020 --> 01:33:01,080
Planning Advisory Committee.

2392
01:33:01,080 --> 01:33:03,080
This is not about the

2393
01:33:03,080 --> 01:33:04,080
architectural design of the

2394
01:33:04,080 --> 01:33:07,080
project. As a next step, the

2395
01:33:07,080 --> 01:33:08,080
planning advisory committee will

2396
01:33:08,080 --> 01:33:10,080
have to analyze the project

2397
01:33:10,080 --> 01:33:13,080
under the site planning an

2398
01:33:13,080 --> 01:33:14,080
architectural integration

2399
01:33:14,080 --> 01:33:18,080
program, commonly referred to as

2400
01:33:18,080 --> 01:33:20,080
the PIA, and make a

2401
01:33:20,080 --> 01:33:22,080
recommendation to Council. I

2402
01:33:22,080 --> 01:33:23,080
think it is important to explain

2403
01:33:23,080 --> 01:33:27,080
why I had to intervene with my

2404
01:33:27,080 --> 01:33:29,080
vote on the Council split,

2405
01:33:29,080 --> 01:33:31,080
something I rarely do, because I

2406
01:33:31,080 --> 01:33:32,080
prefer our policies and actions

2407
01:33:32,080 --> 01:33:35,080
to be adopted unanimously or at

2408
01:33:35,080 --> 01:33:39,080
the very least by consensus.

2409
01:33:39,080 --> 01:33:40,080
Density projects are often

2410
01:33:40,080 --> 01:33:43,080
opposed by immediate neighbours

2411
01:33:43,080 --> 01:33:45,080
but supported by the general

2412
01:33:45,080 --> 01:33:46,080
population. This is the

2413
01:33:46,080 --> 01:33:49,080
experience of most cities where

2414
01:33:49,080 --> 01:33:54,080
densification is taking place.

2415
01:33:54,080 --> 01:33:56,080
Conscient de cette sensibilité

2416
01:33:56,080 --> 01:33:59,080
du voisinage du projet du 275

2417
01:33:59,080 --> 01:34:02,040
Elm, le conseil a bien pris soin

2418
01:34:02,040 --> 01:34:03,040
de consulter la population pour

2419
01:34:03,040 --> 01:34:04,040
écouter attentivement leurs

2420
01:34:04,040 --> 01:34:06,040
observations...

2421
01:34:06,040 --> 01:34:08,040
(---)

2422
01:34:08,040 --> 01:34:10,040
et leurs préoccupations

2423
01:34:10,040 --> 01:34:11,040
concernant ce projet. C'est

2424
01:34:11,040 --> 01:34:12,040
pourquoi, à la suite de la

2425
01:34:12,040 --> 01:34:16,040
consultation publique, nous

2426
01:34:16,040 --> 01:34:17,040
avons commandé une étude des

2427
01:34:17,040 --> 01:34:18,040
populations qui sera rendu

2428
01:34:18,040 --> 01:34:22,040
public sous peu. Nous avons

2429
01:34:22,040 --> 01:34:23,040
aussi ajouté des conditions aux

2430
01:34:23,040 --> 01:34:27,040
développeurs. Nous avons

2431
01:34:27,040 --> 01:34:29,040
restreint les délais pour éviter

2432
01:34:29,040 --> 01:34:31,040
les inconvénients de la phase de

2433
01:34:31,040 --> 01:34:32,040
construction et nous avons en

2434
01:34:32,040 --> 01:34:33,040
plus imposer la création d'un

2435
01:34:33,040 --> 01:34:37,040
comité de bon voisinage. Cela

2436
01:34:37,040 --> 01:34:39,040
dit, il y a plusieurs raisons

2437
01:34:39,040 --> 01:34:40,040
pour lesquelles il est

2438
01:34:40,040 --> 01:34:41,040
préférable est avisé d'aller de

2439
01:34:41,040 --> 01:34:45,040
l'avant avec ce projet. This

2440
01:34:45,040 --> 01:34:48,040
area is in dire need of

2441
01:34:48,040 --> 01:34:50,040
revitalization. The fact that

2442
01:34:50,040 --> 01:34:52,040
this site has been used strictly

2443
01:34:52,040 --> 01:34:54,040
for commercial purposes for

2444
01:34:54,040 --> 01:34:57,040
decades has shown that it is not

2445
01:34:57,040 --> 01:35:00,000
viable. Most of the businesses

2446
01:35:00,000 --> 01:35:02,000
have left in recent years. As a

2447
01:35:02,000 --> 01:35:07,000
result, the area is not very

2448
01:35:08,000 --> 01:35:11,000
appealing in a purely commercial

2449
01:35:11,000 --> 01:35:13,000
sense. We developing the site as

2450
01:35:13,000 --> 01:35:17,000
a residential area will make it

2451
01:35:17,000 --> 01:35:18,000
more attractive and improve both

2452
01:35:18,000 --> 01:35:21,000
the landscape and the urban

2453
01:35:21,000 --> 01:35:24,000
fabric. It will also maintain

2454
01:35:24,000 --> 01:35:27,000
the limited range of destination

2455
01:35:27,000 --> 01:35:31,000
shops. I understand that

2456
01:35:31,000 --> 01:35:33,000
residents in the immediate

2457
01:35:33,000 --> 01:35:34,000
vicinity are opposed to this

2458
01:35:34,000 --> 01:35:36,000
project, believing that blocking

2459
01:35:36,000 --> 01:35:39,000
it will result in a site being

2460
01:35:39,000 --> 01:35:40,000
developed and a more limited way

2461
01:35:40,000 --> 01:35:45,000
in the future. However, the

2462
01:35:45,000 --> 01:35:48,000
office it is likely to happen

2463
01:35:48,000 --> 01:35:51,000
and in the short term because of

2464
01:35:51,000 --> 01:35:56,000
the current revision of the

2465
01:35:57,000 --> 01:35:59,000
PMAD, which stands for Plan --

2466
01:35:59,000 --> 01:36:01,060
métropolitain de développement

2467
01:36:01,060 --> 01:36:03,060
the framework imposed by the

2468
01:36:03,060 --> 01:36:05,060
Québec government for land

2469
01:36:05,060 --> 01:36:07,060
development. As far as the

2470
01:36:07,060 --> 01:36:08,060
metropolitan region is

2471
01:36:08,060 --> 01:36:10,060
concerned, we already know that

2472
01:36:10,060 --> 01:36:14,060
it will impose densification of

2473
01:36:14,060 --> 01:36:17,060
the territory, particularly in

2474
01:36:17,060 --> 01:36:19,060
major transport routes, such as

2475
01:36:19,060 --> 01:36:23,060
we had on elm with the the two

2476
01:36:24,060 --> 01:36:28,060
train stations.. Le grand

2477
01:36:29,060 --> 01:36:31,060
terrain du 275 Elm, longe la

2478
01:36:31,060 --> 01:36:32,060
voie ferrée et se trouve à peu

2479
01:36:32,060 --> 01:36:34,060
près à mi-chemin entre deux

2480
01:36:34,060 --> 01:36:36,060
stations du train de banlieue

2481
01:36:36,060 --> 01:36:38,060
exo qui dessert le centre-ville.

2482
01:36:38,060 --> 01:36:40,060
Il y a un nouveau paiement sans

2483
01:36:40,060 --> 01:36:45,060
doute adapté d'ici 1 an et c'est

2484
01:36:46,060 --> 01:36:48,060
le 275... 275 Elm, il sera

2485
01:36:48,060 --> 01:36:49,060
classifié pour une densification

2486
01:36:49,060 --> 01:36:51,060
encore plus imposante. On pourra

2487
01:36:51,060 --> 01:36:52,060
penser qu'un bâtiment de deux à

2488
01:36:52,060 --> 01:36:55,060
quatre étages comme c'est le cas

2489
01:36:55,060 --> 01:36:57,060
ici sera insuffisant en vertu de

2490
01:36:57,060 --> 01:37:00,020
ces nouvelles règles. Il faut

2491
01:37:00,020 --> 01:37:01,020
comprendre que ces nouvelles

2492
01:37:01,020 --> 01:37:03,020
règles sont motivés par un

2493
01:37:03,020 --> 01:37:06,020
esprit de développement durable.

2494
01:37:06,020 --> 01:37:08,020
On vise à promouvoir le

2495
01:37:08,020 --> 01:37:09,020
transport actif et collectif et

2496
01:37:09,020 --> 01:37:12,020
à augmenter l'offre d'habitation

2497
01:37:12,020 --> 01:37:13,020
plus abordable tout en réduisant

2498
01:37:13,020 --> 01:37:16,020
le coût des infrastructures

2499
01:37:16,020 --> 01:37:17,020
publiques par la densification

2500
01:37:17,020 --> 01:37:19,020
du territoire. Another factor to

2501
01:37:19,020 --> 01:37:23,020
consider is that new housing --

2502
01:37:23,020 --> 01:37:25,020
is the new housing the project

2503
01:37:25,020 --> 01:37:27,020
will provide. Many Beaconsfield

2504
01:37:27,020 --> 01:37:29,020
residents, particularly seniors,

2505
01:37:29,020 --> 01:37:31,020
want to reduce their obligations

2506
01:37:31,020 --> 01:37:33,020
and the upkeep of their home and

2507
01:37:33,020 --> 01:37:35,020
grounds. It is very difficult

2508
01:37:35,020 --> 01:37:37,020
for them to find appropriate

2509
01:37:37,020 --> 01:37:38,020
housing that will allow them to

2510
01:37:38,020 --> 01:37:41,020
stay in Beaconsfield. This is

2511
01:37:41,020 --> 01:37:43,020
also the case for younger adults

2512
01:37:43,020 --> 01:37:46,020
who want to stay in or return to

2513
01:37:46,020 --> 01:37:47,020
Beaconsfield but who cannot

2514
01:37:47,020 --> 01:37:49,020
afford to buy a single family

2515
01:37:49,020 --> 01:37:51,020
home or do not want a house

2516
01:37:51,020 --> 01:37:54,020
woodland to maintain. Of the

2517
01:37:54,020 --> 01:37:56,020
6600 homes in Beaconsfield,

2518
01:37:56,020 --> 01:37:59,020
there are about 250

2519
01:37:59,020 --> 01:38:02,080
condominiums. This represents

2520
01:38:02,080 --> 01:38:06,080
barely 4% of our housing stock.

2521
01:38:06,080 --> 01:38:08,080
What's more, our vacancy rate is

2522
01:38:08,080 --> 01:38:11,080
less than 3%. Below this

2523
01:38:11,080 --> 01:38:14,080
threshold, experts consider that

2524
01:38:14,080 --> 01:38:17,080
there is a housing shortage.

2525
01:38:17,080 --> 01:38:20,080
Under these circumstances, the

2526
01:38:20,080 --> 01:38:22,080
275 Elm Plaza project will

2527
01:38:22,080 --> 01:38:23,080
provide an opportunity for many

2528
01:38:23,080 --> 01:38:27,080
of our citizens to return or

2529
01:38:27,080 --> 01:38:29,080
choose to live in Beaconsfield.

2530
01:38:29,080 --> 01:38:32,080
Again, -- against this backdrop

2531
01:38:32,080 --> 01:38:36,080
I believe Council is making a

2532
01:38:36,080 --> 01:38:37,080
wise decision that respects the

2533
01:38:37,080 --> 01:38:39,080
needs of the population and is

2534
01:38:39,080 --> 01:38:43,080
keeping with the provision of

2535
01:38:43,080 --> 01:38:46,080
sustainable development. If any

2536
01:38:46,080 --> 01:38:47,080
other councillors wish to

2537
01:38:47,080 --> 01:38:49,080
express their thoughts, please

2538
01:38:49,080 --> 01:38:53,080
go ahead.

2539
01:38:54,080 --> 01:38:55,080
>> I will say a word, Mister

2540
01:38:55,080 --> 01:38:58,080
Mayor. You stole a lot of my

2541
01:38:58,080 --> 01:39:01,040
words though. I don't know what

2542
01:39:01,040 --> 01:39:02,040
to say. I will probably just

2543
01:39:02,040 --> 01:39:04,040
picked on an expanded a couple

2544
01:39:04,040 --> 01:39:06,040
of points you made.

2545
01:39:06,040 --> 01:39:08,040
- J'ai demandé tout à l'heure.

2546
01:39:08,040 --> 01:39:09,040
J'ai dit que je parlerais après

2547
01:39:09,040 --> 01:39:11,040
votre vote.

2548
01:39:11,040 --> 01:39:12,040
- La période de questions est

2549
01:39:12,040 --> 01:39:13,040
finie. Si vous voulez nous

2550
01:39:13,040 --> 01:39:15,040
parler, c'est après. Pas

2551
01:39:15,040 --> 01:39:16,040
maintenant. Je m'excuse.

2552
01:39:16,040 --> 01:39:18,040
- Merci.

2553
01:39:18,040 --> 01:39:19,040
- J'ai demandé tout à l'heure.

2554
01:39:19,040 --> 01:39:22,040
- O.K....

2555
01:39:22,040 --> 01:39:23,040
>> Maybe a reminder also on a

2556
01:39:23,040 --> 01:39:24,040
couple of things, as I said

2557
01:39:24,040 --> 01:39:26,040
before, let me just pick out,

2558
01:39:26,040 --> 01:39:27,040
dive into a couple of points

2559
01:39:27,040 --> 01:39:29,040
that he raised, at the risk of

2560
01:39:29,040 --> 01:39:31,040
being repetitive and so on. I

2561
01:39:31,040 --> 01:39:33,040
also just highlight, this all

2562
01:39:33,040 --> 01:39:36,040
started with the CCU in many

2563
01:39:36,040 --> 01:39:37,040
ways, or the Planning Advisory

2564
01:39:37,040 --> 01:39:39,040
Committee. And as it was

2565
01:39:39,040 --> 01:39:42,040
mentioned earlier it also should

2566
01:39:42,040 --> 01:39:45,040
be known that it's not a City

2567
01:39:45,040 --> 01:39:47,040
committee necessarily, it's a

2568
01:39:47,040 --> 01:39:48,040
residence committee. The six

2569
01:39:48,040 --> 01:39:49,040
members of people just like you

2570
01:39:49,040 --> 01:39:53,040
on that committee. And their

2571
01:39:53,040 --> 01:39:54,040
recommendations after months of

2572
01:39:54,040 --> 01:39:56,040
months of back and forth is just

2573
01:39:56,040 --> 01:39:57,040
recommendation. Again, just a

2574
01:39:57,040 --> 01:39:58,040
recommendation to the City

2575
01:39:58,040 --> 01:40:00,000
Council, which we all know that,

2576
01:40:00,000 --> 01:40:02,000
and I've looked at this for many

2577
01:40:02,000 --> 01:40:04,000
many months and given the amount

2578
01:40:04,000 --> 01:40:05,000
of work that's there, I would

2579
01:40:05,000 --> 01:40:07,000
also like to thank all of

2580
01:40:07,000 --> 01:40:08,000
Council and the CCU, who

2581
01:40:08,000 --> 01:40:09,000
probably listen tonight, but all

2582
01:40:09,000 --> 01:40:11,000
the people who came, most of you

2583
01:40:11,000 --> 01:40:12,000
are here tonight, who also came

2584
01:40:12,000 --> 01:40:13,000
to the public consultations as

2585
01:40:13,000 --> 01:40:15,000
well, because that was very

2586
01:40:15,000 --> 01:40:17,000
helpful in a lot of the changes.

2587
01:40:17,000 --> 01:40:18,000
And you probably see a lot of

2588
01:40:18,000 --> 01:40:19,000
people going through the

2589
01:40:19,000 --> 01:40:21,000
documents, you see a lot of the

2590
01:40:21,000 --> 01:40:22,000
conditions and stuff that were

2591
01:40:22,000 --> 01:40:24,000
added. And for the most part,

2592
01:40:24,000 --> 01:40:25,000
that was because of the public

2593
01:40:25,000 --> 01:40:26,000
consultations, the ones that

2594
01:40:26,000 --> 01:40:28,000
were done by the City

2595
01:40:28,000 --> 01:40:32,000
specifically. So I think

2596
01:40:32,000 --> 01:40:33,000
congratulations for that,

2597
01:40:33,000 --> 01:40:34,000
because it was very helpful, and

2598
01:40:34,000 --> 01:40:35,000
we'd listen to all of those

2599
01:40:35,000 --> 01:40:37,000
comments, put all that together

2600
01:40:37,000 --> 01:40:39,000
at the same time. And those are

2601
01:40:39,000 --> 01:40:40,000
important conditions around

2602
01:40:40,000 --> 01:40:42,000
that. And a lot of them reflect

2603
01:40:42,000 --> 01:40:46,000
not only about the -- itself,

2604
01:40:46,000 --> 01:40:48,000
which is fundamentally the

2605
01:40:48,000 --> 01:40:50,000
parameters of a project. We

2606
01:40:50,000 --> 01:40:51,000
don't know what a building is

2607
01:40:51,000 --> 01:40:53,000
going to look like. I know a lot

2608
01:40:53,000 --> 01:40:54,000
of you have talked about and

2609
01:40:54,000 --> 01:40:55,000
brought up issues around the

2610
01:40:55,000 --> 01:40:57,000
building, because a presented a

2611
01:40:57,000 --> 01:41:00,060
caricature of a structure. And

2612
01:41:00,060 --> 01:41:01,060
sometimes that's the one that

2613
01:41:01,060 --> 01:41:03,060
gets imprinted in your mind. But

2614
01:41:03,060 --> 01:41:04,060
that is not the official project

2615
01:41:04,060 --> 01:41:06,060
that has been submitted. But

2616
01:41:06,060 --> 01:41:08,060
tonight, it's clearly not about

2617
01:41:08,060 --> 01:41:10,060
the project. The project has a

2618
01:41:10,060 --> 01:41:12,060
structure, but simply has the

2619
01:41:12,060 --> 01:41:13,060
parameters around the form of

2620
01:41:13,060 --> 01:41:16,060
something that go in there. So I

2621
01:41:16,060 --> 01:41:17,060
am just saying that in a

2622
01:41:17,060 --> 01:41:20,060
different way. The other thing

2623
01:41:20,060 --> 01:41:24,060
is that this was also mentioned

2624
01:41:25,060 --> 01:41:26,060
in one of the criteria. And I

2625
01:41:26,060 --> 01:41:28,060
think it's an important one. I

2626
01:41:28,060 --> 01:41:29,060
saw a few people shrunk about

2627
01:41:29,060 --> 01:41:34,060
it. But I look at it a little

2628
01:41:34,060 --> 01:41:35,060
differently as the resident

2629
01:41:35,060 --> 01:41:36,060
committee during the

2630
01:41:36,060 --> 01:41:37,060
implementation. A lot of

2631
01:41:37,060 --> 01:41:38,060
comments that are brought up

2632
01:41:38,060 --> 01:41:39,060
tonight with the same ones

2633
01:41:39,060 --> 01:41:40,060
trying to consultation, pretty

2634
01:41:40,060 --> 01:41:43,060
much about the nuisance during a

2635
01:41:43,060 --> 01:41:45,060
construction period, Dustin

2636
01:41:45,060 --> 01:41:47,060
sound and whatnot. So a lot of

2637
01:41:47,060 --> 01:41:48,060
that stuff would happen no

2638
01:41:48,060 --> 01:41:50,060
matter what got built on that.

2639
01:41:50,060 --> 01:41:53,060
You are not going to see one

2640
01:41:53,060 --> 01:41:54,060
single family home in acres of

2641
01:41:54,060 --> 01:41:55,060
grass going around that.

2642
01:41:55,060 --> 01:41:57,060
Whatever would go there would be

2643
01:41:57,060 --> 01:41:59,060
a sizeable project to begin

2644
01:41:59,060 --> 01:42:02,020
with. So there would always be a

2645
01:42:02,020 --> 01:42:03,020
little bit of dust and whatnot

2646
01:42:03,020 --> 01:42:05,020
there. But I think we would take

2647
01:42:05,020 --> 01:42:07,020
in some mitigation around that

2648
01:42:07,020 --> 01:42:08,020
in terms of the barrier. But I

2649
01:42:08,020 --> 01:42:11,020
think beyond that and ongoing to

2650
01:42:11,020 --> 01:42:15,020
have the committee, which would

2651
01:42:15,020 --> 01:42:16,020
have a lot of, some of you

2652
01:42:16,020 --> 01:42:18,020
there, for example, and even

2653
01:42:18,020 --> 01:42:20,020
some of the people to be defined

2654
01:42:20,020 --> 01:42:21,020
ultimately. But the point of

2655
01:42:21,020 --> 01:42:23,020
having that committee in and of

2656
01:42:23,020 --> 01:42:24,020
itself with a permit or all the

2657
01:42:24,020 --> 01:42:27,020
people there gives a way to

2658
01:42:27,020 --> 01:42:29,020
either mitigate or to plan for

2659
01:42:29,020 --> 01:42:30,020
certain things that will be

2660
01:42:30,020 --> 01:42:33,020
happening. I believe that the

2661
01:42:33,020 --> 01:42:35,020
promoter is acting in good

2662
01:42:35,020 --> 01:42:37,020
faith. So if you are acting the

2663
01:42:37,020 --> 01:42:38,020
relationship so far, I guess

2664
01:42:38,020 --> 01:42:39,020
he's also frustrated, because he

2665
01:42:39,020 --> 01:42:40,020
doesn't have a plan to work with

2666
01:42:40,020 --> 01:42:41,020
either. So there could be that

2667
01:42:41,020 --> 01:42:43,020
element. That is just my

2668
01:42:43,020 --> 01:42:45,020
conjecture. But nonetheless, the

2669
01:42:45,020 --> 01:42:47,020
fact that that opportunity is

2670
01:42:47,020 --> 01:42:49,020
there to move forward on a

2671
01:42:49,020 --> 01:42:52,020
project I think is practical and

2672
01:42:52,020 --> 01:42:54,020
useful. So I think we didn't

2673
01:42:54,020 --> 01:42:55,020
really expand on, that but I

2674
01:42:55,020 --> 01:42:57,020
think it's an important one,

2675
01:42:57,020 --> 01:42:58,020
because it involves the

2676
01:42:58,020 --> 01:42:59,020
residents choice. I wanted to

2677
01:42:59,020 --> 01:43:00,080
bring that up. The other thing,

2678
01:43:00,080 --> 01:43:03,080
not to repeat anything, but I

2679
01:43:03,080 --> 01:43:04,080
think also I look at this and

2680
01:43:04,080 --> 01:43:06,080
Council looks at it and say we

2681
01:43:06,080 --> 01:43:07,080
look at ourselves also looking

2682
01:43:07,080 --> 01:43:08,080
at a broader perspective. We

2683
01:43:08,080 --> 01:43:10,080
touched on this a little bit

2684
01:43:10,080 --> 01:43:13,080
looking at the types of --

2685
01:43:13,080 --> 01:43:14,080
>> I don't have an answer for,

2686
01:43:14,080 --> 01:43:15,080
that is there something else I

2687
01:43:15,080 --> 01:43:16,080
could help with?

2688
01:43:16,080 --> 01:43:17,080
>> Well, my phone is smarter

2689
01:43:17,080 --> 01:43:20,080
than I am. Well, I have an

2690
01:43:20,080 --> 01:43:23,080
answer for that. Part of it is

2691
01:43:23,080 --> 01:43:25,080
also looking at housing in

2692
01:43:25,080 --> 01:43:28,080
general. And we are conscious of

2693
01:43:28,080 --> 01:43:31,080
that in Beaconsfield,

2694
01:43:31,080 --> 01:43:32,080
predominately unit family

2695
01:43:32,080 --> 01:43:34,080
structures and so on. Now we've

2696
01:43:34,080 --> 01:43:36,080
seen it in other areas and there

2697
01:43:36,080 --> 01:43:38,080
are other projects that we have

2698
01:43:38,080 --> 01:43:39,080
certainly been looking at in the

2699
01:43:39,080 --> 01:43:41,080
future, looking to diversify

2700
01:43:41,080 --> 01:43:43,080
what we can offer in terms of --

2701
01:43:43,080 --> 01:43:44,080
we sought over and over over the

2702
01:43:44,080 --> 01:43:46,080
years. People want have

2703
01:43:46,080 --> 01:43:49,080
different housing opportunities,

2704
01:43:49,080 --> 01:43:50,080
different housing of

2705
01:43:50,080 --> 01:43:51,080
combinations and so on, whether

2706
01:43:51,080 --> 01:43:52,080
be in an apartment, condo, town

2707
01:43:52,080 --> 01:43:54,080
house, what have you. So this

2708
01:43:54,080 --> 01:43:57,080
type of project and others

2709
01:43:57,080 --> 01:44:01,040
perhaps to follow really help to

2710
01:44:01,040 --> 01:44:03,040
diversify what we offer to the

2711
01:44:03,040 --> 01:44:04,040
city. And a lot of people have

2712
01:44:04,040 --> 01:44:06,040
been looking forward to that.

2713
01:44:06,040 --> 01:44:08,040
That's why people criticize

2714
01:44:08,040 --> 01:44:09,040
Beaconsfield sometimes, we don't

2715
01:44:09,040 --> 01:44:10,040
offer enough of that. So this is

2716
01:44:10,040 --> 01:44:12,040
one way, one project of perhaps

2717
01:44:12,040 --> 01:44:13,040
more to come that we can

2718
01:44:13,040 --> 01:44:16,040
actually do that. The other

2719
01:44:16,040 --> 01:44:18,040
thing, the last point as well,

2720
01:44:18,040 --> 01:44:19,040
which is an important one, I

2721
01:44:19,040 --> 01:44:23,040
look at it this way is also the

2722
01:44:23,040 --> 01:44:25,040
future, not only for our broader

2723
01:44:25,040 --> 01:44:26,040
perspective, but we need to be

2724
01:44:26,040 --> 01:44:28,040
mindful of what can come down.

2725
01:44:28,040 --> 01:44:29,040
You mentioned this, Mister

2726
01:44:29,040 --> 01:44:33,040
Mayor, about -- and so on. Now

2727
01:44:33,040 --> 01:44:34,040
what we are looking at a PPCMOI

2728
01:44:34,040 --> 01:44:36,040
tonight, you can imagine, in

2729
01:44:36,040 --> 01:44:37,040
certain areas, even without a

2730
01:44:37,040 --> 01:44:39,040
PPCMOI, just a zoning, people

2731
01:44:39,040 --> 01:44:40,040
can come in and do something

2732
01:44:40,040 --> 01:44:42,040
that can be much more dense and

2733
01:44:42,040 --> 01:44:44,040
much more dense than what we are

2734
01:44:44,040 --> 01:44:48,040
proposing here tonight, without

2735
01:44:48,040 --> 01:44:49,040
even doing a PPCMOI. So it could

2736
01:44:49,040 --> 01:44:52,040
just be part of a zone that

2737
01:44:52,040 --> 01:44:54,040
would qualify, for example. So

2738
01:44:54,040 --> 01:44:56,040
this does give an example to

2739
01:44:56,040 --> 01:44:59,040
control some of the apartments

2740
01:44:59,040 --> 01:45:01,000
and so on. The volume of the

2741
01:45:01,000 --> 01:45:02,000
overall project when it first

2742
01:45:02,000 --> 01:45:05,000
started, carrying down to what

2743
01:45:05,000 --> 01:45:06,000
it is today is actually

2744
01:45:06,000 --> 01:45:07,000
significantly less than what it

2745
01:45:07,000 --> 01:45:08,000
was originally. I know that may

2746
01:45:08,000 --> 01:45:10,000
not please all of you, I

2747
01:45:10,000 --> 01:45:11,000
understand, but it's to be noted

2748
01:45:11,000 --> 01:45:15,000
nonetheless. So I think overall,

2749
01:45:15,000 --> 01:45:18,000
we are just getting started.

2750
01:45:18,000 --> 01:45:19,000
With the PPCMOI, it's really

2751
01:45:19,000 --> 01:45:22,000
just the first step of what I

2752
01:45:22,000 --> 01:45:24,000
think would be the next step in

2753
01:45:24,000 --> 01:45:26,000
what this thing is going to look

2754
01:45:26,000 --> 01:45:28,000
like when we are there. I think

2755
01:45:28,000 --> 01:45:30,000
that's a big important step,

2756
01:45:30,000 --> 01:45:31,000
because a lot of your comments

2757
01:45:31,000 --> 01:45:32,000
have been about that type of

2758
01:45:32,000 --> 01:45:34,000
thing. Because it's not as

2759
01:45:34,000 --> 01:45:35,000
technical. It's always easier to

2760
01:45:35,000 --> 01:45:36,000
get your head around a picture

2761
01:45:36,000 --> 01:45:37,000
when you are looking at

2762
01:45:37,000 --> 01:45:39,000
something they are a lot of

2763
01:45:39,000 --> 01:45:40,000
potentially numbers on a page

2764
01:45:40,000 --> 01:45:42,000
and so on, which becomes very

2765
01:45:42,000 --> 01:45:45,000
academic in a way. So I think we

2766
01:45:45,000 --> 01:45:47,000
have a good opportunity in front

2767
01:45:47,000 --> 01:45:48,000
of us and responsibility at the

2768
01:45:48,000 --> 01:45:50,000
same time. So we are looking for

2769
01:45:50,000 --> 01:45:54,000
to that as we go for it.

2770
01:45:54,000 --> 01:45:56,000
>> Thank, you Councillor Newell.

2771
01:45:56,000 --> 01:45:57,000
Any other comments?

2772
01:45:57,000 --> 01:45:59,000
>> I would say -- thank, you

2773
01:45:59,000 --> 01:46:01,060
Mister Mayor. I'm not going to

2774
01:46:01,060 --> 01:46:03,060
add any more to what residents

2775
01:46:03,060 --> 01:46:07,060
have been saying since September

2776
01:46:07,060 --> 01:46:10,060
council and also at the public

2777
01:46:10,060 --> 01:46:13,060
consultations and tonight. I

2778
01:46:13,060 --> 01:46:15,060
thought that tonight we heard

2779
01:46:15,060 --> 01:46:17,060
some really interesting stories

2780
01:46:17,060 --> 01:46:19,060
that were different than what we

2781
01:46:19,060 --> 01:46:22,060
had heard before. It was

2782
01:46:22,060 --> 01:46:25,060
interesting tonight that a

2783
01:46:25,060 --> 01:46:26,060
president mention the new --

2784
01:46:26,060 --> 01:46:28,060
that's coming. That's certainly

2785
01:46:28,060 --> 01:46:30,060
a risk that we all take that

2786
01:46:30,060 --> 01:46:32,060
perhaps densification at the Elm

2787
01:46:32,060 --> 01:46:33,060
Plaza might be higher. But at

2788
01:46:33,060 --> 01:46:36,060
the same time, the key word

2789
01:46:36,060 --> 01:46:37,060
there was that the City will

2790
01:46:37,060 --> 01:46:39,060
have its own power and it will

2791
01:46:39,060 --> 01:46:41,060
not lose it. And I think what

2792
01:46:41,060 --> 01:46:43,060
most of the citizens were

2793
01:46:43,060 --> 01:46:44,060
concerned about where things

2794
01:46:44,060 --> 01:46:47,060
like the setbacks, you know

2795
01:46:47,060 --> 01:46:49,060
other infringements that are

2796
01:46:49,060 --> 01:46:53,060
taking place. So I hope that is

2797
01:46:53,060 --> 01:46:56,060
something that the City, Mister

2798
01:46:56,060 --> 01:46:57,060
Mayor, may take into

2799
01:46:57,060 --> 01:46:59,060
consideration and some of the

2800
01:46:59,060 --> 01:47:01,020
other -- if it's possible

2801
01:47:01,020 --> 01:47:06,020
tonight. But at the same time,

2802
01:47:06,020 --> 01:47:08,020
let's not who that with the

2803
01:47:08,020 --> 01:47:10,020
future demand they would allow a

2804
01:47:10,020 --> 01:47:12,020
five year construction period

2805
01:47:12,020 --> 01:47:13,020
and also bring another

2806
01:47:13,020 --> 01:47:14,020
guarantees in protections for

2807
01:47:14,020 --> 01:47:16,020
the public's and residents and

2808
01:47:16,020 --> 01:47:18,020
also to the daycare nursery.

2809
01:47:18,020 --> 01:47:21,020
>> Yeah, I just want to rectify

2810
01:47:21,020 --> 01:47:24,020
one thing. The density of a

2811
01:47:24,020 --> 01:47:27,020
particular area such as that one

2812
01:47:27,020 --> 01:47:30,020
on elm would be imposed on us,

2813
01:47:30,020 --> 01:47:32,020
will not be in our power to

2814
01:47:32,020 --> 01:47:35,020
determine the density. It will

2815
01:47:35,020 --> 01:47:37,020
be imposed by the government.

2816
01:47:37,020 --> 01:47:38,020
>> I did say also, I'm hoping

2817
01:47:38,020 --> 01:47:40,020
that some of the -- if there's

2818
01:47:40,020 --> 01:47:42,020
any initial preconditions that

2819
01:47:42,020 --> 01:47:44,020
can be made to the project now

2820
01:47:44,020 --> 01:47:48,020
that it's moving ahead, and I

2821
01:47:48,020 --> 01:47:50,020
believe that for the urban

2822
01:47:50,020 --> 01:47:52,020
planning in the City to work

2823
01:47:52,020 --> 01:47:55,020
about, be added as well for --

2824
01:47:55,020 --> 01:47:57,020
as soon as possible, given the

2825
01:47:57,020 --> 01:48:00,080
vote tonight. Encourage you to

2826
01:48:00,080 --> 01:48:01,080
do it.

2827
01:48:01,080 --> 01:48:05,080
>> Any other comments? Okay, we

2828
01:48:05,080 --> 01:48:09,080
will move on. Request for

2829
01:48:09,080 --> 01:48:12,080
approval of a first draft for a

2830
01:48:12,080 --> 01:48:13,080
specific construction project,

2831
01:48:13,080 --> 01:48:16,080
alteration or occupancy

2832
01:48:16,080 --> 01:48:17,080
proposals for an immovable

2833
01:48:17,080 --> 01:48:18,080
(SCAOPI)

2834
01:48:18,080 --> 01:48:23,080
located at 550 Beaconsfield,

2835
01:48:25,080 --> 01:48:26,080
Beaconsfield

2836
01:48:26,080 --> 01:48:27,080
(lots 1 416 861 and 1 416 862

2837
01:48:27,080 --> 01:48:28,080
of the Cadastre of Québec)

2838
01:48:28,080 --> 01:48:29,080
in zone C102 of Zoning By-law

2839
01:48:29,080 --> 01:48:30,080
720

2840
01:48:30,080 --> 01:48:32,080
(Project PP-13-1)

2841
01:48:32,080 --> 01:48:37,080
. The recommendation of the CC

2842
01:48:38,080 --> 01:48:39,080
is to refuse.

2843
01:48:39,080 --> 01:48:40,080
>> I propose.

2844
01:48:40,080 --> 01:48:43,080
>> I second.

2845
01:48:43,080 --> 01:48:44,080
>> In favour of the

2846
01:48:44,080 --> 01:48:48,080
recommendation?

2847
01:48:49,080 --> 01:48:54,080
- À l'unamimité. Demande

2848
01:48:54,080 --> 01:48:55,080
d'approbation du Plan

2849
01:48:55,080 --> 01:48:56,080
d'implantation et d'intégration

2850
01:48:56,080 --> 01:48:57,080
architecturale

2851
01:48:57,080 --> 01:48:58,080
(PIIA)

2852
01:48:58,080 --> 01:48:59,080
relatif à la demande d'un permis

2853
01:48:59,080 --> 01:49:00,040
de construction pour un nouveau

2854
01:49:00,040 --> 01:49:01,040
bâtiment principal situé au 74,

2855
01:49:01,040 --> 01:49:02,040
Devon. La recommandation est de

2856
01:49:02,040 --> 01:49:03,040
refuser.

2857
01:49:03,040 --> 01:49:04,040
- Proposé.

2858
01:49:04,040 --> 01:49:05,040
- Secondé.

2859
01:49:05,040 --> 01:49:06,040
- En faveur pour la

2860
01:49:06,040 --> 01:49:07,040
recommandation.

2861
01:49:07,040 --> 01:49:08,040
- Request for the approval à

2862
01:49:08,040 --> 01:49:09,040
l'unamimité. of the Site

2863
01:49:09,040 --> 01:49:10,040
Planning and Architectural

2864
01:49:10,040 --> 01:49:11,040
Integration Programme

2865
01:49:11,040 --> 01:49:12,040
(SPAIP)

2866
01:49:12,040 --> 01:49:13,040
relating to a building permit

2867
01:49:13,040 --> 01:49:14,040
application for the extension of

2868
01:49:14,040 --> 01:49:15,040
the main building located at 88

2869
01:49:15,040 --> 01:49:18,040
Beaconsfield. The recommendation

2870
01:49:18,040 --> 01:49:21,040
is to approve as per planned the

2871
01:49:21,040 --> 01:49:24,040
positive on March 12th, 2024.

2872
01:49:24,040 --> 01:49:25,040
>> Proposed.

2873
01:49:25,040 --> 01:49:27,040
>> Seconded.

2874
01:49:27,040 --> 01:49:28,040
>> In favour of the

2875
01:49:28,040 --> 01:49:31,040
recommendation?

2876
01:49:31,040 --> 01:49:33,040
- À l'unamimité. Demande

2877
01:49:33,040 --> 01:49:34,040
d'approbation du Plan

2878
01:49:34,040 --> 01:49:35,040
d'implantation et d'intégration

2879
01:49:35,040 --> 01:49:36,040
architecturale

2880
01:49:36,040 --> 01:49:37,040
(PIIA)

2881
01:49:37,040 --> 01:49:38,040
relatif à la demande d'un permis

2882
01:49:38,040 --> 01:49:39,040
de construction pour

2883
01:49:39,040 --> 01:49:40,040
l'agrandissement du bâtiment

2884
01:49:40,040 --> 01:49:41,040
principal situé au 116, Angell.

2885
01:49:41,040 --> 01:49:42,040
La recommandation est de

2886
01:49:42,040 --> 01:49:44,040
refuser.

2887
01:49:44,040 --> 01:49:45,040
- Proposé.

2888
01:49:45,040 --> 01:49:46,040
- Secondé.

2889
01:49:46,040 --> 01:49:47,040
- Request for the approval en

2890
01:49:47,040 --> 01:49:48,040
faveur du projet de of the Site

2891
01:49:48,040 --> 01:49:49,040
Planning and recommandations.

2892
01:49:49,040 --> 01:49:50,040
- À l'unanimité. Architectural

2893
01:49:50,040 --> 01:49:51,040
Integration Programme

2894
01:49:51,040 --> 01:49:52,040
(SPAIP)

2895
01:49:52,040 --> 01:49:53,040
relating to a building permit

2896
01:49:53,040 --> 01:49:54,040
application for the extension of

2897
01:49:54,040 --> 01:49:57,040
the main building located at 124

2898
01:49:57,040 --> 01:50:00,000
Taywood. The recommendation is

2899
01:50:00,000 --> 01:50:03,000
to approve, as per planned

2900
01:50:03,000 --> 01:50:07,000
positive on March -- 2024.

2901
01:50:07,000 --> 01:50:08,000
>> Proposed.

2902
01:50:08,000 --> 01:50:10,000
>> I second.

2903
01:50:10,000 --> 01:50:11,000
- En faveur de la

2904
01:50:11,000 --> 01:50:16,000
recommandation.

2905
01:50:16,000 --> 01:50:17,000
Demande d'approbation du Plan

2906
01:50:17,000 --> 01:50:18,000
d’implantation et d’intégration

2907
01:50:18,000 --> 01:50:19,000
architecturale

2908
01:50:19,000 --> 01:50:20,000
(PIIA)

2909
01:50:20,000 --> 01:50:21,000
relatif à la demande d'un permis

2910
01:50:21,000 --> 01:50:22,000
de construction pour

2911
01:50:22,000 --> 01:50:23,000
l'agrandissement d'un bâtiment

2912
01:50:23,000 --> 01:50:24,000
principal situé au 124, Taywood

2913
01:50:24,000 --> 01:50:25,000
(---)

2914
01:50:25,000 --> 01:50:28,000
168, Chartwell, plutôt.

2915
01:50:28,000 --> 01:50:29,000
(---)

2916
01:50:29,000 --> 01:50:31,000
à l'unamimité. Request for the

2917
01:50:31,000 --> 01:50:32,000
approval of the Site Planning

2918
01:50:32,000 --> 01:50:33,000
and Architectural Integration

2919
01:50:33,000 --> 01:50:34,000
Programme

2920
01:50:34,000 --> 01:50:35,000
(SPAIP)

2921
01:50:35,000 --> 01:50:36,000
relating to a building permit

2922
01:50:36,000 --> 01:50:37,000
application for the extension of

2923
01:50:37,000 --> 01:50:38,000
the main building located at 285

2924
01:50:38,000 --> 01:50:43,000
Westcroft. The recommendation is

2925
01:50:43,000 --> 01:50:44,000
to refuse.

2926
01:50:44,000 --> 01:50:46,000
>> Proposed.

2927
01:50:46,000 --> 01:50:47,000
>> Second.

2928
01:50:47,000 --> 01:50:51,000
>> In favour.

2929
01:50:51,000 --> 01:50:52,000
- À l'unamimité. Demande

2930
01:50:52,000 --> 01:50:53,000
d'approbation du Plan

2931
01:50:53,000 --> 01:50:54,000
d'implantation et d’intégration

2932
01:50:54,000 --> 01:50:55,000
architecturale

2933
01:50:55,000 --> 01:50:56,000
(PIIA)

2934
01:50:56,000 --> 01:50:57,000
relatif à la demande d'un permis

2935
01:50:57,000 --> 01:50:58,000
de construction pour la

2936
01:50:58,000 --> 01:50:59,000
modification de la façade du

2937
01:50:59,000 --> 01:51:00,060
bâtiment principal situé au 180,

2938
01:51:00,060 --> 01:51:03,060
Sherwood. La recommandation est

2939
01:51:03,060 --> 01:51:05,060
d'approuver.

2940
01:51:05,060 --> 01:51:07,060
- Proposé.

2941
01:51:07,060 --> 01:51:09,060
- En faveur.

2942
01:51:09,060 --> 01:51:10,060
- Request for the approval of

2943
01:51:10,060 --> 01:51:11,060
the Site Planning and à

2944
01:51:11,060 --> 01:51:12,060
l'unamimité. Architectural

2945
01:51:12,060 --> 01:51:13,060
Integration Programme

2946
01:51:13,060 --> 01:51:14,060
(SPAIP)

2947
01:51:14,060 --> 01:51:15,060
relating to a building permit

2948
01:51:15,060 --> 01:51:16,060
application for the modification

2949
01:51:16,060 --> 01:51:17,060
of the facade of a main building

2950
01:51:17,060 --> 01:51:21,060
located at 224 Sherwood. The

2951
01:51:22,060 --> 01:51:23,060
recommendation is to approve.

2952
01:51:23,060 --> 01:51:24,060
>> Proposed.

2953
01:51:24,060 --> 01:51:25,060
>> Seconded.

2954
01:51:25,060 --> 01:51:28,060
>> In favour.

2955
01:51:28,060 --> 01:51:29,060
- À l'unamimité. Demande

2956
01:51:29,060 --> 01:51:30,060
d'approbation du Plan

2957
01:51:30,060 --> 01:51:31,060
d'implantation et d'intégration

2958
01:51:31,060 --> 01:51:32,060
architecturale

2959
01:51:32,060 --> 01:51:33,060
(PIIA)

2960
01:51:33,060 --> 01:51:35,060
relatif à la demande d'un permis

2961
01:51:35,060 --> 01:51:36,060
de construction pour la

2962
01:51:36,060 --> 01:51:37,060
modification de la façade du

2963
01:51:37,060 --> 01:51:38,060
bâtiment principal situé au 361,

2964
01:51:38,060 --> 01:51:41,060
Robin. La recommandation est de

2965
01:51:41,060 --> 01:51:43,060
refuser. Cependant, le Conseil

2966
01:51:43,060 --> 01:51:44,060
accepte la proposition de

2967
01:51:44,060 --> 01:51:46,060
vinyle.

2968
01:51:46,060 --> 01:51:50,060
- Proposé.

2969
01:51:50,060 --> 01:51:53,060
- En faveur d'accepter la

2970
01:51:53,060 --> 01:51:56,060
recommandation telle que décrite

2971
01:51:56,060 --> 01:52:01,020
par... accepting -- yeah. Okay,

2972
01:52:04,020 --> 01:52:06,020
good.

2973
01:52:06,020 --> 01:52:08,020
- À l'unamimité. Request for the

2974
01:52:08,020 --> 01:52:09,020
approval of the Site Planning

2975
01:52:09,020 --> 01:52:10,020
and Architectural Integration

2976
01:52:10,020 --> 01:52:11,020
Programme

2977
01:52:11,020 --> 01:52:12,020
(SPAIP)

2978
01:52:12,020 --> 01:52:13,020
relating to a building permit

2979
01:52:13,020 --> 01:52:14,020
application to modify the

2980
01:52:14,020 --> 01:52:15,020
already approved plan at 30

2981
01:52:15,020 --> 01:52:19,020
Madsen. The recommendation is to

2982
01:52:19,020 --> 01:52:20,020
refuse.

2983
01:52:20,020 --> 01:52:23,020
>> Proposed. Seconded.

2984
01:52:23,020 --> 01:52:26,020
- En faveur.

2985
01:52:26,020 --> 01:52:28,020
- À l'unamimité. Demande de

2986
01:52:28,020 --> 01:52:29,020
certificat d'autorisation pour

2987
01:52:29,020 --> 01:52:30,020
l'installation d'une enseigne

2988
01:52:30,020 --> 01:52:31,020
pour le commerce situé au 482,

2989
01:52:31,020 --> 01:52:35,020
Beaconsfield - Suite 203. La

2990
01:52:35,020 --> 01:52:37,020
recommandation est d'approuver

2991
01:52:37,020 --> 01:52:41,020
selon l'option du fond blanc.

2992
01:52:41,020 --> 01:52:42,020
- Proposé.

2993
01:52:42,020 --> 01:52:43,020
- Secondé.

2994
01:52:43,020 --> 01:52:44,020
- En faveur.

2995
01:52:44,020 --> 01:52:46,020
- À l'unanimité. Permanent

2996
01:52:46,020 --> 01:52:47,020
nomination as Chef de section,

2997
01:52:47,020 --> 01:52:52,020
bâtiments to position 5105.

2998
01:52:55,020 --> 01:53:00,080
>> Proposed.

2999
01:53:00,080 --> 01:53:03,080
- En faveur.

3000
01:53:03,080 --> 01:53:06,080
- À l'unanimité. Nomination en

3001
01:53:06,080 --> 01:53:07,080
vue de permanence à titre de

3002
01:53:07,080 --> 01:53:08,080
Contremaître, égouts et aqueducs

3003
01:53:08,080 --> 01:53:09,080
au poste 5204

3004
01:53:09,080 --> 01:53:12,080
>>. Proposed.

3005
01:53:12,080 --> 01:53:17,080
>> In favour. Nomination in view

3006
01:53:17,080 --> 01:53:18,080
of permanency as Agente,

3007
01:53:18,080 --> 01:53:19,080
- À l'unanimité. Paie et

3008
01:53:19,080 --> 01:53:21,080
avantages sociaux to position

3009
01:53:21,080 --> 01:53:25,080
2002.

3010
01:53:26,080 --> 01:53:27,080
- Je propose.

3011
01:53:27,080 --> 01:53:28,080
- Je seconde.

3012
01:53:28,080 --> 01:53:29,080
- En faveur.

3013
01:53:29,080 --> 01:53:30,080
- À l'unanimité. Nomination en

3014
01:53:30,080 --> 01:53:31,080
vue de permanence à titre

3015
01:53:31,080 --> 01:53:32,080
d'Inspectrice en canopée au

3016
01:53:32,080 --> 01:53:37,080
poste 7108.

3017
01:53:37,080 --> 01:53:40,080
- Je propose.

3018
01:53:40,080 --> 01:53:42,080
- En faveur. Suspension of an

3019
01:53:42,080 --> 01:53:43,080
employee

3020
01:53:43,080 --> 01:53:45,080
- À l'unanimité.

3021
01:53:45,080 --> 01:53:46,080
>> I propose.

3022
01:53:46,080 --> 01:53:47,080
>> Second.

3023
01:53:47,080 --> 01:53:51,080
>> In favour.

3024
01:53:51,080 --> 01:53:52,080
- À l'unanimité. Procès-verbal

3025
01:53:52,080 --> 01:53:53,080
de la réunion du Comité

3026
01:53:53,080 --> 01:53:54,080
consultatif d'urbanisme du 6

3027
01:53:54,080 --> 01:53:56,080
mars 2024.

3028
01:53:56,080 --> 01:53:58,080
- Proposé.

3029
01:53:58,080 --> 01:54:01,040
- Secondé.

3030
01:54:01,040 --> 01:54:04,040
>> Anything to say?

3031
01:54:04,040 --> 01:54:06,040
- Non, je n'ai pas d'autres

3032
01:54:06,040 --> 01:54:07,040
commentaires au-delà de ce qu'on

3033
01:54:07,040 --> 01:54:11,040
est passé à travers ce soir.

3034
01:54:11,040 --> 01:54:12,040
Renewal of the mandate of a

3035
01:54:12,040 --> 01:54:14,040
member of the Traffic

3036
01:54:14,040 --> 01:54:15,040
- À l'unanimité. Advisory

3037
01:54:15,040 --> 01:54:17,040
Committee

3038
01:54:17,040 --> 01:54:20,040
>> Mister Chairman, I propose.

3039
01:54:20,040 --> 01:54:24,040
We are welcoming back -- for a

3040
01:54:24,040 --> 01:54:27,040
second term. Ms. Lalonde is a

3041
01:54:27,040 --> 01:54:29,040
resident of the sweet bar area,

3042
01:54:29,040 --> 01:54:31,040
so we are looking forward to

3043
01:54:31,040 --> 01:54:34,040
continue working with her.

3044
01:54:34,040 --> 01:54:35,040
>>

3045
01:54:35,040 --> 01:54:36,040
>>

3046
01:54:36,040 --> 01:54:38,040
>> Second. In favour.

3047
01:54:38,040 --> 01:54:41,040
>> Oh, yeah, sorry, second.

3048
01:54:41,040 --> 01:54:43,040
- À l'unanimité. Nomination d'un

3049
01:54:43,040 --> 01:54:44,040
cadre de la Ville de

3050
01:54:44,040 --> 01:54:45,040
Beaconsfield au Comité du Fonds

3051
01:54:45,040 --> 01:54:48,040
de pension.

3052
01:54:48,040 --> 01:54:49,040
- Proposé.

3053
01:54:49,040 --> 01:54:53,040
- J'appuie.

3054
01:54:53,040 --> 01:54:54,040
- Est-ce qu'on peut mentionner

3055
01:54:54,040 --> 01:54:56,040
ce qui?

3056
01:54:56,040 --> 01:54:58,040
- Oui, il s'agit d'un autre

3057
01:54:58,040 --> 01:55:00,000
trésorier et directeur des

3058
01:55:00,000 --> 01:55:02,000
finances, Robert Lacroix, suite

3059
01:55:02,000 --> 01:55:03,000
au départ de l'assistant

3060
01:55:03,000 --> 01:55:06,000
trésorière. Donc, il va combler

3061
01:55:06,000 --> 01:55:07,000
ce poste-là pour quelques mois.

3062
01:55:07,000 --> 01:55:10,000
On verra en mi-juin s'il va

3063
01:55:10,000 --> 01:55:11,000
continuer là aussi on va

3064
01:55:11,000 --> 01:55:12,000
redonner à la remplaçante de

3065
01:55:12,000 --> 01:55:14,000
Dominique.

3066
01:55:14,000 --> 01:55:19,000
- En faveur.

3067
01:55:23,000 --> 01:55:26,000
- Est-ce qu'on avait proposé?

3068
01:55:26,000 --> 01:55:27,000
Federal infrastructure parfait.

3069
01:55:27,000 --> 01:55:28,000
C'est donc à l'unanimité.

3070
01:55:28,000 --> 01:55:29,000
Funding not keeping pace with

3071
01:55:29,000 --> 01:55:33,000
population growth.

3072
01:55:33,000 --> 01:55:34,000
>> I propose.

3073
01:55:34,000 --> 01:55:35,000
>> Second.

3074
01:55:35,000 --> 01:55:40,000
>> In favour.

3075
01:55:41,000 --> 01:55:42,000
- À l'unanimité. Dépôt du

3076
01:55:42,000 --> 01:55:43,000
rapport annuel portant sur

3077
01:55:43,000 --> 01:55:44,000
l'application du règlement de

3078
01:55:44,000 --> 01:55:45,000
gestion contractuelle BEAC-151

3079
01:55:45,000 --> 01:55:48,000
pour l'année 2023. Mandate given

3080
01:55:48,000 --> 01:55:49,000
to il s'agit d'un dépôt.

3081
01:55:49,000 --> 01:55:50,000
Bélanger Sauvé law firm to

3082
01:55:50,000 --> 01:55:51,000
represent the City of

3083
01:55:51,000 --> 01:55:52,000
Beaconsfield's interests

3084
01:55:52,000 --> 01:55:53,000
regarding the private property

3085
01:55:53,000 --> 01:55:57,000
located at 372 Chantilly.

3086
01:55:58,000 --> 01:55:59,000
>> Proposed.

3087
01:55:59,000 --> 01:56:00,060
>> Seconded.

3088
01:56:00,060 --> 01:56:05,060
>> In favour. Demande

3089
01:56:07,060 --> 01:56:08,060
d'autorisation pour tenir des

3090
01:56:08,060 --> 01:56:09,060
opérations de nuit dans le cadre

3091
01:56:09,060 --> 01:56:10,060
d'un tournage cinématographique

3092
01:56:10,060 --> 01:56:13,060
au 313, Pinetree le 2 mai 2024.

3093
01:56:13,060 --> 01:56:15,060
- Proposé.

3094
01:56:15,060 --> 01:56:16,060
- J'appuie.

3095
01:56:16,060 --> 01:56:17,060
- En faveur. Authorization for

3096
01:56:17,060 --> 01:56:18,060
street

3097
01:56:18,060 --> 01:56:19,060
- À l'unanimité. Closure for the

3098
01:56:19,060 --> 01:56:20,060
event Beau Market, on Fridays

3099
01:56:20,060 --> 01:56:23,060
between May 31 and September 13,

3100
01:56:23,060 --> 01:56:28,060
2024, from 2 p.m. to 6:30 p.m..

3101
01:56:32,060 --> 01:56:33,060
>> Proposed.

3102
01:56:33,060 --> 01:56:34,060
>> Seconded.

3103
01:56:34,060 --> 01:56:36,060
>> All in favour.

3104
01:56:36,060 --> 01:56:41,060
>> Unanimous.

3105
01:56:42,060 --> 01:56:43,060
- Autorisation pour Les Amis du

3106
01:56:43,060 --> 01:56:44,060
Village Beaurepaire d'organiser

3107
01:56:44,060 --> 01:56:45,060
une vente de garage

3108
01:56:45,060 --> 01:56:46,060
communautaire

3109
01:56:46,060 --> 01:56:47,060
(Big Beau)

3110
01:56:47,060 --> 01:56:48,060
dans le secteur du Village

3111
01:56:48,060 --> 01:56:49,060
Beaurepaire le 11 mai 2024 de 10

3112
01:56:49,060 --> 01:56:50,060
h 30 à 19 h 30 et autorisation

3113
01:56:50,060 --> 01:56:54,060
de fermeture de rue.

3114
01:56:54,060 --> 01:56:55,060
>> I propose.

3115
01:56:55,060 --> 01:56:56,060
>> Second.

3116
01:56:56,060 --> 01:56:59,060
>> In favour. Authorization to

3117
01:56:59,060 --> 01:57:00,020
sign

3118
01:57:00,020 --> 01:57:01,020
- À l'unanimité. Professional

3119
01:57:01,020 --> 01:57:02,020
services agreements with the

3120
01:57:02,020 --> 01:57:04,020
finalists of the architectural

3121
01:57:04,020 --> 01:57:05,020
competition as part of the

3122
01:57:05,020 --> 01:57:09,020
Imagine Centennial project.

3123
01:57:10,020 --> 01:57:11,020
>> Propose.

3124
01:57:11,020 --> 01:57:12,020
>> Second.

3125
01:57:12,020 --> 01:57:14,020
>> In favour.

3126
01:57:14,020 --> 01:57:15,020
- À lui d'un imité.

3127
01:57:15,020 --> 01:57:16,020
Municipalisation de partie de

3128
01:57:16,020 --> 01:57:18,020
voie ouverte à la circulation

3129
01:57:18,020 --> 01:57:19,020
publique depuis au moins dix ans

3130
01:57:19,020 --> 01:57:20,020
en vertu de l'article 72 de la

3131
01:57:20,020 --> 01:57:23,020
Loi sur les compétences

3132
01:57:23,020 --> 01:57:27,020
municipales. Il s'agit de la rue

3133
01:57:27,020 --> 01:57:28,020
Lakeshore dans le secteur

3134
01:57:28,020 --> 01:57:31,020
Thompson point.

3135
01:57:31,020 --> 01:57:32,020
- Proposé.

3136
01:57:32,020 --> 01:57:33,020
- J'appuie.

3137
01:57:33,020 --> 01:57:34,020
- En faveur.

3138
01:57:34,020 --> 01:57:35,020
- À l'unanimité. Authorization

3139
01:57:35,020 --> 01:57:36,020
to request a financial support

3140
01:57:36,020 --> 01:57:38,020
for the free training leading to

3141
01:57:38,020 --> 01:57:40,020
national lifeguard and aquatic

3142
01:57:40,020 --> 01:57:41,020
instructor for the period of

3143
01:57:41,020 --> 01:57:45,020
April 1, 2024, to March 31,

3144
01:57:45,020 --> 01:57:48,020
2025.

3145
01:57:48,020 --> 01:57:51,020
>> I propose.

3146
01:57:51,020 --> 01:57:52,020
>> Second.

3147
01:57:52,020 --> 01:57:55,020
>> In favour.

3148
01:57:55,020 --> 01:57:56,020
- À l'unanimité. Rapport du

3149
01:57:56,020 --> 01:57:57,020
maire sur les décisions prises

3150
01:57:57,020 --> 01:57:59,020
par le Conseil d'agglomération

3151
01:57:59,020 --> 01:58:01,080
lors de sa séance du 21 mars

3152
01:58:01,080 --> 01:58:04,080
2024.

3153
01:58:04,080 --> 01:58:07,080
- La seule chose que je voudrais

3154
01:58:07,080 --> 01:58:09,080
mentionner, c'est qu'à

3155
01:58:09,080 --> 01:58:11,080
l'agglomération, à la séance du

3156
01:58:11,080 --> 01:58:12,080
conseil d'agglomération, les

3157
01:58:12,080 --> 01:58:16,080
maires des villes reconstituée,

3158
01:58:16,080 --> 01:58:20,080
veulent Hillier, continue de

3159
01:58:20,080 --> 01:58:24,080
voter contre les items sur le

3160
01:58:25,080 --> 01:58:27,080
partage des dépenses entre

3161
01:58:27,080 --> 01:58:29,080
Montréal et les villes liées où

3162
01:58:29,080 --> 01:58:34,080
les villes reconstituée. Alors,

3163
01:58:34,080 --> 01:58:35,080
c'est un message qu'on essaie de

3164
01:58:35,080 --> 01:58:38,080
passer à Montréal qu'on est

3165
01:58:38,080 --> 01:58:40,080
réellement pas d'accord avec la

3166
01:58:40,080 --> 01:58:43,080
façon que les dépenses de

3167
01:58:43,080 --> 01:58:45,080
l'agglomération sont partagées

3168
01:58:45,080 --> 01:58:48,080
par Montréal et par les villes

3169
01:58:48,080 --> 01:58:51,080
liées. On continue, à chaque

3170
01:58:51,080 --> 01:58:53,080
séance agglomérations, on va

3171
01:58:53,080 --> 01:58:55,080
continuer à voter contre les

3172
01:58:55,080 --> 01:58:57,080
systèmes où il y a un partage de

3173
01:58:57,080 --> 01:58:58,080
dépenses entre Montréal et les

3174
01:58:58,080 --> 01:59:03,040
villes liées.

3175
01:59:04,040 --> 01:59:05,040
>> The positive or the

3176
01:59:05,040 --> 01:59:08,040
director's report.

3177
01:59:08,040 --> 01:59:11,040
- Pas du tout.

3178
01:59:11,040 --> 01:59:16,040
- C'est bon.

3179
01:59:17,040 --> 01:59:19,040
- Alors, les affaires nouvelles.

3180
01:59:19,040 --> 01:59:21,040
Je ne pense pas qu'il y ait des

3181
01:59:21,040 --> 01:59:22,040
affaires nouvelles, à ce que je

3182
01:59:22,040 --> 01:59:24,040
sache. Alors, est-ce que

3183
01:59:24,040 --> 01:59:27,040
quelqu'un va proposer et

3184
01:59:27,040 --> 01:59:28,040
seconder la levée de la séance?

3185
01:59:28,040 --> 01:59:29,040
- Je propose.

3186
01:59:29,040 --> 01:59:30,040
- Je seconde.

3187
01:59:30,040 --> 01:59:33,040
- Merci beaucoup. And I want to

3188
01:59:33,040 --> 01:59:38,040
thank everyone that still here

3189
01:59:38,040 --> 01:59:41,040
for state for the whole meeting.

3190
01:59:41,040 --> 01:59:44,040
It is much appreciated. Quite

3191
01:59:44,040 --> 01:59:47,040
often after the question period,

3192
01:59:47,040 --> 01:59:51,040
the room empties. And it's not

3193
01:59:51,040 --> 01:59:55,040
the case this time. It is much

3194
01:59:55,040 --> 01:59:58,040
appreciated that you showed an

3195
01:59:58,040 --> 02:00:02,000
interest and what goes on in

3196
02:00:02,000 --> 02:00:04,000
your cities and that you were

3197
02:00:04,000 --> 02:00:09,000
there for the whole agenda. Et

3198
02:00:10,000 --> 02:00:12,000
je remercie aussi les gens qui

3199
02:00:12,000 --> 02:00:16,000
sont sur la webdiffusion. Merci

3200
02:00:16,000 --> 02:00:18,000
beaucoup d'avoir été patient,

3201
02:00:18,000 --> 02:00:19,000
parce que c'est une réunion qui

3202
02:00:19,000 --> 02:00:24,000
a quand même duré 2 heures. Mais

3203
02:00:25,000 --> 02:00:27,000
je suggérais, la prochaine fois,

3204
02:00:27,000 --> 02:00:31,000
que madame Godin soit en charge

3205
02:00:31,000 --> 02:00:32,000
de la réunion, parce que pour

3206
02:00:32,000 --> 02:00:34,000
elle, ça a été 41 minutes.

3207
02:00:34,000 --> 02:00:39,000
Alors, 41 minutes. Elle a été

3208
02:00:39,000 --> 02:00:42,000
très efficace pour la réunion.

3209
02:00:42,000 --> 02:00:44,000
Aujourd'hui, c'est 2 heures.

3210
02:00:44,000 --> 02:00:45,000
Mais merci beaucoup pour les

3211
02:00:45,000 --> 02:00:46,000
gens sur la webdiffusion de nous

3212
02:00:46,000 --> 02:00:48,000
regarder. Thank you very much

3213
02:00:48,000 --> 02:00:50,000
for watching us and showing an

3214
02:00:50,000 --> 02:00:53,000
interest in your city. And we

3215
02:00:53,000 --> 02:00:57,000
will see you all next month. Au

3216
02:00:58,000 --> 02:01:00,060
mois prochain. Encore une fois,

3217
02:01:00,060 --> 02:01:02,060
je vous invite à venir à la

3218
02:01:02,060 --> 02:01:04,060
réunion du conseil du mois

3219
02:01:04,060 --> 02:01:05,060
d'avril. Merci.

3220
02:01:05,060 --> 02:01:07,060
| | |