[0:05] - Lundi le 15 juillet lundi le
[0:07] 15 juillet.
[0:09] >> Welcome to the regular
[0:11] meeting of the municipal council
[0:13] of Monday, July the 15th.
[0:16] And now we will go to the
[0:19] opening of the meeting and the
[0:21] agenda.
[0:22] - Donc, adoption de l'ordre du
[0:23] jour de la séance ordinaire de
[0:25] la Ville de Beaconsfield du 15
[0:27] juillet 2024, avec le retrait du
[0:29] point
[0:30] (---)
[0:31] qui est une nuisance aux 285,
[0:32] West Kraft.
[0:34] - Je propose.
[0:35] >> Propose.
[0:36] - Je seconde.
[0:37] >> - En faveur.
[0:40] - À l'unanimité.
[0:41] - Oui.
[0:44] - Alors, nous allons procéder à
[0:45] la période de questions
[0:48] immédiatement. Le commandant
[0:51] n'est pas avec nous ce soir,
[0:52] c'est à nouveau commandant au PQ
[0:55] à un. Il ne pouvait pas être
[0:57] avec nous ce soir, alors
[1:01] espérons qu'en août, il aura la
[1:03] chance de rencontrer tout le
[1:04] monde. Alors, la période de
[1:09] questions, la première question,
[1:10] c'est de madame Pauline vagues
[1:12] et Girard.
[1:15] (inaudible)
[1:16] Sujet: dérogation mineure. La
[1:20] question sur le 45.1 elle
[1:26] demande
[1:27] (---)
[1:28] une information pour la
[1:29] propriété située au 215, ferme.
[1:31] Sa préoccupation est à propos de
[1:33] l'école JFK. Si c'est pour
[1:35] permettre un agrandissement de
[1:37] l'édifice, il sera difficile de
[1:39] planter autant d'arbres qu'il y
[1:40] en a maintenant. Est-ce que la
[1:41] ville pourrait exiger que le
[1:43] toit de cet agrandissement
[1:44] soient couverts des végétaux?
[1:46] Sinon, le suggéré fortement. Ce
[1:48] couvert végétale pourrait
[1:50] d'ailleurs être intégré dans un
[1:52] projet pédagogique pour les
[1:54] étudiants.
[1:59] Pour cette question-là, voici la
[2:03] réponse, Madame Gérard. Pour la
[2:05] demande de dérogation mineure du
[2:11] 215, Elm, soit pour une demande
[2:13] moindre que le ratio de 1.1
[2:18] demander par le règlement, il
[2:19] est vrai que le site comporte
[2:20] beaucoup de contraintes faisant
[2:21] en sorte que le remplacement
[2:24] entier tel que prévu au
[2:25] règlement sera difficile à
[2:27] atteindre. Toutefois, l'objectif
[2:31] derrière cette norme du
[2:34] règlement est de limiter la
[2:36] perte de canopée que procurent
[2:37] les arbres dans la ville et à
[2:40] proximité d'îlots de chaleur. Il
[2:41] y a des alternatives qui sont
[2:43] étudiées par le centre de
[2:44] services scolaires afin de
[2:47] minimiser la perte de canopée
[2:49] tout en permettant la
[2:53] modernisation de l'aménagement
[2:54] et d'infrastructures sur le site
[2:56] tout en répondant aux besoins de
[2:58] la clientèle de cette école. La
[3:02] deuxième question sur le 45.3,
[3:08] demande de dérogation mineure
[3:09] sur la propriété située au...
[3:12] (---)
[3:13] entre le 134, l'arche et le...
[3:21] (---)
[3:22] ce projet demande plusieurs
[3:23] dérogation. On semble vouloir
[3:25] faire un édifice plus grand que
[3:28] permis sur une surface plus
[3:29] petite que permise. Est-ce
[3:32] vraiment raisonnable? Voici la
[3:34] réponse, Madame Girard. Pour ce
[3:37] qui est projetée
[3:38] (---)
[3:39] , les normes en vigueur dans le
[3:40] règlement d'urbanisme de la
[3:42] ville sont établis en tenant
[3:44] compte que plus de la majorité
[3:45] du territoire se comportent
[3:48] d'habitations unifamiliales
[3:49] isolées. Elles sont donc peu
[3:51] adaptées à des projets de
[3:54] bâtiments multifamiliaux. À
[3:56] proximité d'infrastructures de
[3:58] transport collectif comme le
[4:00] train de banlieue, ce qui
[4:02] explique les demandes de
[4:05] dérogation pour qu'il se
[4:06] réalise. La proposition en est
[4:09] une deuxième d'un projet
[4:11] similaire qui a fait l'objet
[4:12] d'une approbation en 2023. Dans
[4:15] le présent projet, il y a une
[4:17] amélioration du pourcentage
[4:19] d'espaces verts sur le terrain.
[4:23] Notamment... ainsi qu'un nombre
[4:24] de cas de stationnement basé à
[4:27] proximité aux transports
[4:28] collectifs et sur l'utilisation
[4:30] des cas des bâtiments voisins de
[4:32] même type. Il est aussi à noter
[4:35] que ce type d'habitation répond
[4:37] à un besoin criant en logement
[4:39] sur l'île de Montréal. The next
[4:44] question comes from --
[4:46] from Saint Andrew.
[4:49] The subject is objection to
[4:54] minor --
[4:55] and new constructions.
[4:56] She indicates her objections to
[4:58] the minor exemption request at
[5:02] 215 elm for the replacement of
[5:05] --
[5:06] trees.
[5:07] She also indicates her
[5:08] objections to the construction
[5:09] of new building at ten Madsen
[5:13] 66, Raquel, and a new extension
[5:16] at 79 Saint Andrew.
[5:19] The objection to the minor
[5:20] exemption request is noted, and
[5:23] the comments will be transferred
[5:25] to the administration.
[5:30] Next question comes from two
[5:34] questions actually, from Mr.
[5:37] Derek --
[5:38] in Sweet Briar.
[5:40] The first question is on 20.3,
[5:46] authorization to sign a lease on
[5:47] water property with the Québec
[5:48] government for deepwater
[5:51] Charlotte yacht club and
[5:53] confirmation of its purpose.
[5:58] 20.4, request for approval for
[6:00] dates of sale,
[6:08] 1 416 984 and 1 417 002 in
[6:10] accordance with sections for 511
[6:13] following the cities and towns
[6:14] act following the non payment of
[6:16] taxes in 2023.
[6:19] We can come back to question
[6:23] one, re: agenda item 20.3 and
[6:29] 20.4 for 15 July 2024.
[6:31] The council meeting appears to
[6:34] be --
[6:35] please explain in transparent
[6:36] terms where is the deep water
[6:40] ashore lot that you wish to read
[6:43] from the Québec government
[6:44] interference purpose.
[6:45] Since the city has owned the
[6:47] yacht club for decades.
[6:48] In 2024, request approval of the
[6:51] tough sale project by which the
[6:53] City seeds block 1 416 984 and 1
[6:59] 417 002.
[7:03] Mr. pounds is kind of putting
[7:06] together those two questions and
[7:09] referring to the two questions,
[7:11] and so I will try to answer his
[7:15] questions.
[7:16] Items 20.3 and 20.4 or not
[7:20] linked.
[7:21] Item 20.3 is regarding the
[7:24] deepwater short lot located at
[7:28] the Beaconsfield yacht club.
[7:30] The City must leased the
[7:32] deepwater, not the land,
[7:34] adjacent to the Beaconsfield
[7:37] yacht club property where the
[7:40] club is located.
[7:41] Since it is the property of the
[7:42] government of Québec, our
[7:46] previously's had expired, and
[7:48] this resolution is to request
[7:49] the authorization to sign a new
[7:54] lease.
[7:55] Item 20.4, 20.4 it is regarding
[8:01] the sale of lots located in
[8:04] Lakeview north which are sold in
[8:06] 2023 during the auction sale for
[8:08] non payment of taxes which took
[8:11] place in June 2023.
[8:13] These lots were sold to an
[8:16] individual who purchased both
[8:17] lots for the amount of unpaid
[8:20] taxes perched plus certain fees.
[8:22] The law provides a one-year
[8:23] period during which the previous
[8:25] owners can buy back the land.
[8:28] The previous owners have not
[8:29] done so, and a one-year period
[8:32] is now over.
[8:33] Therefore, the buyer can now
[8:35] receive deed of sale to become
[8:36] the official owner of the lots.
[8:43] His other question is on items
[8:48] 30.2, 30 point, three and 30.4.
[8:50] A warning about issue of or teen
[8:54] million --
[8:55] dollars following a public call,
[8:59] 30.3 resolution of an extension
[9:02] relating to a long term bonds in
[9:03] the amount of 14,491,000, which
[9:07] will be carried out on July
[9:09] 25th, 2024.
[9:10] Transfers from on appropriated
[9:15] surplus as of December 31, 2023,
[9:18] two appropriated surplus upon
[9:21] recommendation of the finance
[9:24] committee.
[9:25] And please advise that the
[9:27] amount of the an appropriated
[9:29] surplus of December 31st, 2023,
[9:36] and the 14 million dollar bond
[9:39] to finance the restoration
[9:42] project.
[9:43] If your answer is no, then how
[9:44] will it be used?
[9:46] Well, the amount of the an
[9:48] appropriated surplus being
[9:50] transferred is one point $5
[9:54] million, and it is being
[9:55] transferred as follows.
[9:56] One billion dollars for
[9:59] balancing future leisure's,
[10:02] $400,000 for the centennial,
[10:06] $100,000 for professional
[10:08] services, and 91,820 from the
[10:13] angel reserve through the
[10:15] professional services reserve.
[10:18] This amount is not combined with
[10:20] the bond.
[10:22] Neither used to finance the
[10:24] where creation Centre
[10:27] restoration project.
[10:28] They are unrelated.
[10:29] The bond is used to refinance
[10:31] past projects and depths
[10:38] debts.
[10:39] That will cover the written
[10:40] questions that we have received
[10:41] and that we will go for more
[10:44] questions.
[10:53] >> May I ask why cutting 60
[10:58] trees is at 215 Ellen is
[11:03] considered a minor exemption?
[11:04] That is a lot of mature trees,
[11:06] and I thought that Beaconsfield
[11:07] was one of the cities that was
[11:09] really big on protecting their
[11:11] trees?
[11:13] >> Yeah, I think that you
[11:14] already asked that question.
[11:16] >> I did, but it is an important
[11:18] question to ask.
[11:19] >> And I say that the objection
[11:20] for the minor objection request
[11:22] is voted, and the comments will
[11:24] be transferred to the
[11:25] administration.
[11:26] So, the administration will take
[11:28] care of your question.
[11:29] >> What I was trying to say is
[11:32] that I was walking and Angel
[11:35] woods today and a notice that it
[11:36] was much cooler when there were
[11:37] a lot of trees.
[11:39] It would save the school a lot
[11:40] of money leaving the trees where
[11:43] they are and would cut down on
[11:46] problematic behaviour within the
[11:48] school, but kids would have a
[11:50] much higher success rate, and
[11:53] they would learn a lot better
[11:54] with having trees than having
[11:56] more pavement.
[11:57] They need trees.
[12:00] >> We have a request for a minor
[12:03] objection at 45.1 on the agenda,
[12:07] and the council will vote on
[12:08] that one.
[12:10] >> Thank you.
[12:11] That is what I am referring to.
[12:12] I hope you guys vote to save the
[12:14] trees because it is really
[12:16] important.
[12:17] >> Thank you.
[12:26] >> Hi, my name is Frank.
[12:30] The policeman is not here, and
[12:33] so I am having a question that
[12:38] the police could get involved
[12:42] with.
[12:43] Just for the fun of it, I am
[12:44] standing here --
[12:45] I am a cop and I'm standing here
[12:47] with my gun, and I'm telling you
[12:48] that hey, on my street,
[12:52] Stonehenge Drive, there are
[12:56] complaints constantly, and
[12:58] people are using that for a
[13:02] highway.
[13:03] Highway number two sometimes.
[13:04] The street is only 24 feet wide.
[13:06] There is no sidewalks, and
[13:10] people have complained
[13:12] constantly, Frank, there is a
[13:13] stop sign there, Frank!
[13:14] >> Did you call SPVM to
[13:18] complain?
[13:19] Did you do that?
[13:20] >> Hey, hold it, the story has
[13:21] been going after 20 years!
[13:22] >> Why don't you call SPVM.
[13:26] The commandant is not here
[13:27] tonight, but call and he will
[13:28] tell you exactly what I'm going
[13:31] to tell you.
[13:32] If you noticed any problems with
[13:35] traffic, in the speeding, please
[13:38] call SPVM and they will take
[13:39] care of it.
[13:41] >> Well I am on my veranda and I
[13:42] see this guy going 60 miles an
[13:44] hour.
[13:45] I am worried about >>.
[13:47] I am the oldest guy on the
[13:49] street, right?
[13:50] >> Call the SPVM.
[13:51] Call SPVM.
[13:52] >> I called them more than once.
[13:55] >> Well, keep going.
[13:56] >> And then what?
[13:58] No, the street is getting worse.
[14:02] They can't use it as a highway!
[14:04] >> Frank, that is a police
[14:07] manner.
[14:08] Call SPVM.
[14:09] Thank you.
[14:10] >> Well, that is not fair at
[14:12] all!
[14:13] You should have something to say
[14:14] about this!
[14:15] >> Thank you very much.
[14:17] >> My councillor here would like
[14:19] to say something.
[14:24] >> What I can tell you is that
[14:28] we are concerned with the speed,
[14:33] and there is an issue.
[14:35] There is also a process.
[14:36] I agree with the mayor that the
[14:40] SPVM can be called.
[14:41] Someone filed a request with the
[14:43] traffic advisory committee, and
[14:45] what is going to happen in the
[14:46] near future is that the speed
[14:48] serve it will be conducted, and
[14:50] as the case may be, measures, if
[14:53] appropriate, will be taken to
[14:54] slow down traffic.
[14:56] >> You know, I made a sacrifice
[14:58] by not driving my cars.
[15:01] No, I just want to make that
[15:04] clear.
[15:05] I am breathing carbon monoxide,
[15:07] Mister Mayor!
[15:08] And I have only so many years to
[15:11] live.
[15:12] >> Thank you very much, Frank.
[15:17] >> Any other questions from the
[15:18] floor?
[15:24] Thank you very much.
[15:25] So we will go on to the agenda.
[15:32] Adoption of --
[15:34] June 17th 2024.
[15:37] >> Proposed.
[15:39] >> Seconded.
[15:40] >> All in favour?
[15:43] - À l'unanimité. >>
[15:44] [Inaudible]
[15:47] Octroi d'un mandat de gré à gré
[15:49] pour la rénovation de la
[15:51] patinoire à Services EXP inc.,
[15:55] Pour la somme de 53 256,42 $,
[15:56] toutes taxes incluses
[15:57] (RGC 2024-11)
[15:59] c'est le contrat
[16:01] (---)
[16:02] .
[16:03] - Je propose.
[16:05] - En faveur.
[16:07] - À l'unanimité.
[16:11] >> Authorization to install the
[16:14] fibre optic into the --
[16:16] right of way.
[16:19] - J'appuie.
[16:20] - En faveur.
[16:23] - Ça unanimité.
[16:33] 20.3 Autorisation de signature
[16:34] du bail hydrique avec le
[16:35] gouvernement du Québec pour un
[16:36] lot de grève en eau profonde
[16:37] (Yacht Club de Beaconsfield)
[16:38] et confirmation de son objet.
[16:39] >> In favour.
[16:40] - Unanimité.
[16:41] >> Request for approval of the
[16:44] project by which the city of
[16:46] Beaconsfield seeks lot
[16:56] 1 416 984 and 1 417 002 in
[16:57] accordance with sections 511
[16:58] andfollowing of the Cities and
[16:59] Towns Act following the sale for
[17:00] non-payment of taxes process of
[17:01] 2023
[17:04] >> Proposed?
[17:05] >> Seconded.
[17:06] >> In favour.
[17:09] - À l'unanimité. 30.1
[17:12] Approbation de la liste des
[17:13] comptes à payer au 15 juillet
[17:14] 2024, et de la liste des
[17:15] paiements préautorisés pour la
[17:16] période du 6 juin 2024 au 16
[17:17] juin 2024 et du 18 juin 2024 au
[17:20] 3 juillet 2024, pour un déboursé
[17:21] total de 3 649 383,81 $.
[17:30] >> Proposed.
[17:31] >> Seconded.
[17:32] >> In favour.
[17:36] - À l'unanimité.
[17:44] A warning of the bond issue of
[17:49] $14,491,000 following a public
[17:50] call for tenders.
[17:53] Proposed.
[17:55] >> Second.
[17:57] >> In favour.
[18:01] - À l'unanimité.
[18:06] 30.3 Résolution de concordance,
[18:07] de courte échéance et de
[18:08] prolongation relativement à un
[18:09] emprunt par obligations au
[18:10] montant de 14 491 000 $ qui sera
[18:11] réalisé le 25 juillet 2024.
[18:13] - Je propose.
[18:15] - Je seconde.
[18:17] - En faveur.
[18:20] - À l'unanimité. Transfers from
[18:25] unappropriated surplus as of
[18:26] December 31, 2023, to
[18:27] appropriated surplus
[18:28] (upon recommendation of the
[18:29] Finance Committee)
[18:30] .
[18:31] >> Proposed.
[18:33] >> Seconded.
[18:34] >> In favour.
[18:38] - À l'unanimité. Adoption du
[18:41] Règlement BEAC-158 intitulé «
[18:43] Règlement visant à soustraire le
[18:44] territoire de la Ville de
[18:45] Beaconsfield de l'autorisation
[18:46] d'un logement accessoire  ».
[18:48] L'objet de ce règlement est de
[18:49] permettre à la Ville de se
[18:51] soustraira une nouvelle loi
[18:52] provinciale qui permet
[18:53] l'aménagement d'un logement
[18:55] accessoire. Il s'applique sur le
[18:59] territoire entier de
[19:00] Beaconsfield.
[19:01] - Proposé.
[19:02] - J'appuie.
[19:03] - En faveur!
[19:07] - À l'unanimité. Authorization
[19:12] to correct nuisances at 106
[19:14] Florida and to bill the costs to
[19:15] the owner, in virtue of By-law
[19:17] BEAC-033.
[19:19] >> Proposed.
[19:20] >> Seconded.
[19:21] >> In favour.
[19:24] - À l'unanimité. 40.3 Demande
[19:27] d'autorisation de corriger les
[19:28] nuisances au 134, Fairlawn et de
[19:29] facturer le coût des travaux au
[19:30] propriétaire, en vertu du
[19:31] Règlement BEAC-033.
[19:35] - J'appuie.
[19:36] - En faveur.
[19:39] - À l'unanimité.
[19:40] Authorization to correct
[19:41] nuisances at 275 Elm and to bill
[19:46] the costs to the owner, in
[19:47] virtue of By-law BEAC-033 - Je
[19:49] propose.
[19:51] >> In favour.
[19:53] - À l'unanimité. Le point 40.5 a
[19:57] été retiré.
[20:04] Demande d'autorisation de
[20:05] corriger les nuisances au 460,
[20:06] Beaconsfield et de facturer le
[20:07] coût des travaux au
[20:08] propriétaire, en vertu du
[20:09] Règlement BEAC-033.
[20:10] - Proposé.
[20:11] - Secondé.
[20:12] - En faveur.
[20:14] - À l'unanimité. Authorization
[20:17] to correct nuisances on the
[20:21] vacant lots 6 266 981 and 6 266
[20:26] 982
[20:27] (79 Elm)
[20:28] and to bill the costs to the
[20:29] owner, in virtue of By-law
[20:31] BEAC033 >> Proposed.
[20:33] >> I second.
[20:34] - En faveur.
[20:37] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[20:41] d'autorisation de corriger les
[20:42] nuisances sur le lot vacant 6
[20:43] 266 766
[20:44] (205, Alton, côté nord)
[20:46] et de facturer le coût des
[20:47] travaux au propriétaire, en
[20:48] vertu du Règlement BEAC-033.
[20:51] - Proposé.
[20:55] - Secondé.
[20:56] - En faveur.
[20:59] - À l'unanimité.
[21:03] Request for a minor exemption
[21:04] for the property located at 215
[21:05] Elm the recommendation is to
[21:06] refuse.
[21:07] >> Proposed.
[21:08] >> Seconded.
[21:10] >> What is the recommendation?
[21:12] To refuse?
[21:13] In favour of the recommendation?
[21:18] - À l'unanimité. >> Is the
[21:20] recommendation to cut 60 trees?
[21:22] >> The question period is over,
[21:25] so --
[21:26] >> Yeah, but everybody is
[21:27] [Inaudible]
[21:28] --
[21:29] >> No, I am sorry, this is not a
[21:30] question period.
[21:31] >> It was refused.
[21:32] >> It was refused.
[21:34] >> It was refused.
[21:35] >> Why?
[21:36] >> It was refused to cut the 60
[21:39] trees.
[21:40] >> But we cannot have questions
[21:42] until after the question period.
[21:48] - 45.2 Demande de dérogation
[21:49] mineure pour la propriété située
[21:50] au 533, Church. La
[21:51] recommandation est d'approuver.
[21:52] - Proposé.
[21:54] - Secondé.
[21:55] - En faveur!
[21:58] - À l'unanimité. Demande de
[22:01] dérogations mineures pour la
[22:02] propriété située au lot projeté
[22:04] 6 576 815
[22:09] (entre le 134, Larch et le
[22:10] 144, Larch)
[22:11] . La recommandation est
[22:12] d'approuver.
[22:13] - Proposé.
[22:14] - J'appuie.
[22:15] - En faveur de la
[22:16] recommandation.
[22:20] >> I refuse.
[22:21] (inaudible)
[22:22] >> You refuse?
[22:24] [Inaudible]
[22:26] >> Motion carried.
[22:35] - Demande d'approbation du Plan
[22:39] d'implantation et d'intégration
[22:41] architecturale
[22:42] (PIIA)
[22:43] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[22:44] de construction pour un nouveau
[22:45] bâtiment principal situé au 10,
[22:46] Madsen. La recommandation est de
[22:47] refuser.
[22:48] - Proposé.
[22:49] - Secondé.
[22:50] - En faveur.
[22:51] (inaudible)
[22:52] >> I
[22:56] [Inaudible]
[22:57] .
[22:58] I am against the recommendation.
[22:59] >> You are voting against it?
[23:02] - Donc... >> Motion carried.
[23:07] Request for the approval of the
[23:08] Site Planning and Architectural
[23:09] Integration Programme relating
[23:10] to a building permit application
[23:11] for a new main building located
[23:14] at 66 St-Louis.
[23:15] The recommendation is to refuse.
[23:16] >> Propose.
[23:17] >> Seconded.
[23:18] >> In favour of recommendation.
[23:23] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[23:26] d'approbation du Plan
[23:27] d'implantation et d'intégration
[23:28] architecturale
[23:29] (PIIA)
[23:30] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[23:31] de construction pour un nouveau
[23:32] bâtiment principal situé sur un
[23:33] lot projeté 6 576 815
[23:37] (entre le 134, Larch et 144,
[23:38] Larch)
[23:39] . La recommandation est
[23:40] d'approuver.
[23:41] - Proposé.
[23:43] - Secondé.
[23:44] - En faveur de la
[23:46] recommandation.
[23:49] - À l'unanimité. Request for the
[23:54] approval of the Site Planning
[23:58] and Architectural Integration
[24:01] Programme relating to a building
[24:02] permit application for a new
[24:03] main building located at.
[24:06] 1 Angell --
[24:07] >> Proposed, seconded.
[24:09] >> In favour as a
[24:10] recommendation.
[24:12] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[24:15] d'approbation du Plan
[24:16] d'implantation et d'intégration
[24:18] architecturale
[24:19] (PIIA)
[24:20] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[24:21] de construction pour
[24:22] l'agrandissement du bâtiment
[24:23] principal situé au 79,
[24:24] St-Andrew. La recommandation est
[24:25] de refuser.
[24:26] - Proposé.
[24:27] - Secondé.
[24:28] - En faveur de la
[24:30] recommandation.
[24:32] - À l'unanimité.
[24:38] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[24:39] d'implantation et d'intégration
[24:40] architecturale
[24:41] (PIIA)
[24:42] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[24:43] de construction pour
[24:44] l'agrandissement du bâtiment
[24:45] principal situé au 148,
[24:46] Evergreen. La recommandation est
[24:47] d'approuver selon les plans
[24:48] déposés le 8 juillet 2024.
[24:50] - Proposé.
[24:52] - Je seconde.
[24:53] - En faveur de la
[24:55] recommandation.
[24:57] - À l'unanimité. Request for the
[24:58] approval of the Site Planning
[24:59] and Architectural Integration
[25:02] Programme relating to a building
[25:03] permit application for the
[25:04] extension of the main building
[25:05] located at 367 Balmoral.
[25:10] The recommendation is to
[25:11] approve.
[25:12] >> Proposed.
[25:13] >> Seconded.
[25:14] >> In favour of the
[25:15] recommendation.
[25:16] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[25:19] d'approbation du Plan
[25:20] d'implantation et d'intégration
[25:21] architecturale
[25:22] (PIIA)
[25:23] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[25:24] de construction pour la
[25:25] modification de la façade du
[25:26] bâtiment principal situé au 83,
[25:28] Charleswood. La recommandation
[25:29] est d'approuver.
[25:30] - Proposé.
[25:31] - Secondé.
[25:32] - En faveur de la
[25:33] recommandation.
[25:35] - À l'unanimité. Request for the
[25:37] approval of the Site Planning
[25:38] and Architectural Integration
[25:40] Programme relating to a building
[25:41] permit application for the
[25:43] modification of the facade of a
[25:45] main building located at 373
[25:47] Beaurepaire.
[25:48] The recommendation is to
[25:50] approve.
[25:51] >> Proposed.
[25:52] >> I second.
[25:53] >> In favour of the
[25:54] recommendation.
[25:55] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[25:57] d'approbation du Plan
[25:58] d'implantation et d'intégration
[25:59] architecturale
[26:00] (PIIA)
[26:01] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[26:02] de construction pour la
[26:03] modification du plan déjà
[26:04] approuvé au 30, Madsen. La
[26:06] recommandation est d'approuver.
[26:07] - Proposé.
[26:08] - Je seconde.
[26:09] - En faveur de la
[26:11] recommandation.
[26:13] - À l'unanimité. Request for the
[26:15] approval of the Site Planning
[26:16] and Architectural Integration
[26:18] Programme relating to a building
[26:20] permit application to modify the
[26:21] already approved plan at 57
[26:23] Beaconsfield.
[26:24] The recommendation is to
[26:26] approve.
[26:27] >> Proposed.
[26:28] >> Seconded.
[26:29] >> In favour of the
[26:30] recommendation.
[26:31] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[26:33] d'approbation du Plan
[26:34] d'implantation et d'intégration
[26:35] architecturale
[26:36] (PIIA)
[26:37] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[26:38] de construction pour la
[26:39] modification de la façade du
[26:41] bâtiment principal situé au 519,
[26:42] Westhill. La recommandation est
[26:44] d'approuver.
[26:45] - Proposé.
[26:47] - En faveur de la
[26:49] recommandation.
[26:50] - À l'unanimité. Request for the
[26:52] approval of the Site Planning
[26:53] and Architectural Integration
[26:54] Programme relating to a building
[26:56] permit application for the
[26:58] modification of the facade of a
[26:59] main building located at 599
[27:04] Chester The recommendation is to
[27:05] approve. >> Proposed.
[27:06] >> Seconded. >> In favour of the
[27:07] recommendation. - À l'unanimité.
[27:11] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[27:12] d'implantation et d'intégration
[27:13] architecturale
[27:14] (PIIA)
[27:15] pour le lotissement des lots
[27:16] projetés 6 576 815, 6 576 816 et
[27:19] 6 576 817
[27:25] (132, Larch à 146, Larch)
[27:26] . La recommandation est
[27:29] d'approuver.
[27:30] - Proposé.
[27:33] (inaudible)
[27:39] >> In favour of the
[27:41] recommendation.
[27:42] - À l'unanimité. Acceptance of
[27:48] an amount of $330,924.00 for
[27:53] park fees to be paid by the
[27:54] owner of lot 2 424 121, 132-146
[27:58] Larch, and the projected lots
[28:03] our 6 576 815, 6 576 816 and 6
[28:07] 576 817 to the City, according
[28:10] to By-law BEAC128 concerning
[28:14] contributions for the
[28:15] establishment, maintenance and
[28:17] improvement of parks,
[28:19] playgrounds and natural areas on
[28:20] the City of Beaconsfield's
[28:21] territory.
[28:22] >> I am pleased to propose.
[28:24] >> Second.
[28:26] >> In favour.
[28:28] - À l'unanimité. Demande de
[28:31] prolongation des délais en vertu
[28:32] de la Loi sur l'aménagement et
[28:33] l'urbanisme au ministère des
[28:34] Affaires municipales et de
[28:35] l'Habitation.
[28:38] - Je propose.
[28:40] - En faveur.
[28:42] - À l'unanimité. Nomination in
[28:45] view of permanency as Agent de
[28:46] patrouille municipale to
[28:47] position 7002.
[28:53] >> Proposed. >> I second.
[28:55] - En faveur.
[28:58] - À l'unanimité. Procès-verbal
[29:00] de la réunion du Comité
[29:01] consultatif d'urbanisme du 26
[29:02] juin 2024. >> So I propose the
[29:09] minutes, nothing new to report
[29:10] other than the project we went
[29:11] through.
[29:12] >> Do you want to report
[29:13] something?
[29:14] >> There is nothing over and
[29:15] above the project.
[29:16] So you are proposing?
[29:18] >> I second.
[29:19] >> In favour.
[29:22] - À l'unanimité. Deposit of the
[29:24] minutes of the Demolition
[29:25] Committee meeting of May 14,
[29:27] 2024.
[29:28] Il s'agit d'un dépôt.
[29:31] >> Any comments on the depot?
[29:33] - Le dépôt, oui, merci, Monsieur
[29:35] le Maire. Le dépôt porte sur la
[29:38] demande d'autorisation de
[29:39] démolir deux maisons au huit,
[29:42] ils ont, est au 66, Saint-Louis,
[29:44] le 14 mai dernier. With regards
[29:50] to eight --
[29:51] and St. Louis.
[29:54] In both cases, it was determined
[29:56] that the poor condition of the
[29:59] building for the demolition, --
[30:01] Et aussi en considérant que si
[30:03] on était pour y aller avec une
[30:06] rénovation, une restauration de
[30:07] l'édifice, le coût des travaux
[30:09] était pour être supérieur à la
[30:10] valeur de l'immeuble.
[30:11] So, in both cases, the
[30:13] demolition was awarded.
[30:15] - Merci.
[30:23] Nomination d'un membre au Comité
[30:24] consultatif de circulation.
[30:27] - Alors, je propose la
[30:29] nomination de monsieur Michael
[30:31] (---)
[30:32] ...
[30:33] - Peut-être parler un peu de...
[30:34] - Oui, alors c'est un résidant
[30:35] de Beaconsfield dans le district
[30:37] cinq, six
[30:50] Alors il nous fait plaisir de
[30:52] l'accueillir comme membre du
[30:53] comité consultatif de
[30:55] circulation.
[30:58] >> Who is seconding?
[31:00] - Secondé.
[31:02] - En faveur.
[31:06] - À l'unanimité. Authorization
[31:08] to create and set up a Steering
[31:09] Committee for the renewal of the
[31:12] 2023-2027 AgeFriendly
[31:13] Municipality Policy and Action
[31:14] Plan.
[31:15] >> I propose.
[31:17] >> I second.
[31:19] >> Do you have any comments?
[31:21] >> I'm very excited.
[31:22] We have
[31:23] [Inaudible]
[31:24] >> Could you put it on the mic?
[31:27] >> There we go.
[31:28] We are very excited.
[31:29] This is something that is
[31:30] mandated by the government that
[31:31] we have to do as the committee,
[31:35] and we have organized the
[31:37] steering committee with some
[31:40] residents, and myself, I will be
[31:41] the chair, and Mr. Moss will be
[31:44] the co-chair.
[31:45] We will start working in the
[31:47] fall.
[31:48] >> Thank you.
[31:51] In favour.
[31:52] - En faveur.
[31:57] (inaudible)
[31:59] À l'unanimité.
[32:00] - Oui...
[32:01] - Proposée par madame
[32:03] Alexopoulos est sur... approuvée
[32:07] par monsieur Moss. Modification
[32:11] de la résolution 2024-06-236
[32:12] autorisant la fermeture
[32:13] partielle de rues lors de
[32:14] l'événement de la compétition
[32:15] des nageurs au Club de Natation
[32:16] Beaurepaire le 8 août 2024 de 7
[32:17] h à 20 h afin de modifier la
[32:18] fermeture partielle à une
[32:20] fermeture complète et de
[32:21] préciser les coûts sanitaires.
[32:24] - Proposé.
[32:26] - Secondé.
[32:27] - En faveur!
[32:30] - À l'unanimité.
[32:31] Rescinding of resolution
[32:35] 2024-04-166 regarding the lease
[32:36] agreement with Beaurepaire
[32:37] Nursery Group for the use of the
[32:39] Beacon Hill chalet for the
[32:41] school year 2024-2025.
[32:43] >> I propose.
[32:45] >> I second.
[32:46] >> In favour.
[32:50] - À l'unanimité. Projet Imagine
[32:52] - décision du jury confirmant le
[32:53] choix du lauréat du concours
[32:54] d'architecture
[32:55] pluridisciplinaire pour la
[32:56] construction d'un centre
[32:57] culturel multifonctionnel, il
[32:59] s'agit du projet
[33:00] (24-SP-195)
[33:01] . Il s'agit d'un dépôt.
[33:03] - Un dépôt. Alors, je vous
[33:05] dirais tout simplement informer
[33:07] que le Projet Imagine correspond
[33:11] à une étape clé avec la
[33:13] sélection du projet. Un paysage
[33:15] réinventer par l'équipe Lemay
[33:19] Bouthillette Parizeau elle les
[33:22] honore. Alors, la ville saluent
[33:25] les 32 équipes ayant soumis des
[33:30] candidatures de haut calibre. Le
[33:33] jury coprésidée par Anne-Marie
[33:37] Parent et Gavin affectes... on a
[33:42] sélectionné quatre finalistes en
[33:43] avril, à chacun présentant une
[33:47] identité architecturale unique.
[33:51] Lors des auditions publiques du
[33:52] 2 juillet, les finalistes ont
[33:54] présenté des projets respectant
[33:56] le caractère naturel du site,
[33:59] mettant en valeur le paysage
[34:01] riverains et le patrimoine
[34:03] collectif de Beckham fils. Le
[34:06] projet retenus s'intègre
[34:09] harmonieusement dans le paysage
[34:11] pittoresque du parc Sainte-Anne
[34:15] Yale réponses aux
[34:16] recommandations du rapport sur
[34:17] les consultations publiques et
[34:18] les ateliers créatif pour la
[34:22] revitalisation du parc de
[34:25] Sainte-Agnès et la propriété
[34:26] lors de règne. Ce projet
[34:29] permettra aux citoyens de vivre
[34:30] une expérience unique dans un
[34:33] environnement bucolique. Alors,
[34:36] voilà. C'est une équipe, Lemay,
[34:39] Bouthillette, Parizeau
[34:41] (---)
[34:42] qui a été choisi.
[34:44] - Est-ce que je pourrais juste
[34:46] ajouter?
[34:47] - Oui.
[34:48] - C'est la présentation numéro
[34:49] 4. Juste au cas où qu'on ne se
[34:51] souviennent pas de tous les
[34:52] noms...
[34:53] - C'est une bonne chose de le
[34:54] souligner. C'est la présentation
[34:55] numéro 4. Oui.
[35:01] (rires)
[35:02] (inaudible)
[35:04] Imagine project - mandate to the
[35:06] administration regarding the
[35:07] architectural competition.
[35:08] >> Proposed.
[35:10] >> Seconded.
[35:12] >> In favour.
[35:15] - À l'unanimité. Résolution
[35:19] concernant la position de la
[35:20] Ville de Beaconsfield concernant
[35:21] la hausse des coûts de la taxe
[35:22] sur l'immatriculation des
[35:23] véhicules de promenade de la
[35:24] Communauté métropolitaine de
[35:25] Montréal
[35:26] (CMM)
[35:27] .
[35:28] >> Proposed.
[35:29] - En faveur.
[35:30] >> I second.
[35:32] - À l'unanimité. Mayor's report
[35:33] on the decisions made by the
[35:35] Agglomeration Council at its
[35:36] meeting of June 20, 2024.
[35:43] - Oui, j'aimerais rapporté qu'il
[35:44] y a eu une consultation
[35:48] prébudgétaire qui a été à partir
[35:51] d'avril 2024 jusqu'à la fin de
[35:54] juin. Il y a eu 31 mémoires qui
[35:58] ont été déposés à la
[36:02] consultation de la Commission
[36:03] des finances. Et c'était sur le
[36:09] transport collectif, alors
[36:11] c'était spécifiquement sur le
[36:13] transport collectif. Et ce soir,
[36:18] j'aimerais déposer le rapport
[36:22] des recommandations de la
[36:24] Commission sur les finances.
[36:34] - Dépôt des rapports des
[36:36] directeurs.
[36:38] (bruit)
[36:49] (inaudible)
[37:23] (problème technique)
[37:41] (problème technique)
[37:59] (problème technique)
[38:14] - Alors, merci beaucoup. Thank
[38:17] you very much for attending the
[38:19] meeting.
[38:20] [Inaudible]
[38:24] [Inaudible]
[38:27] And I will begin to remind you
[38:35] as he has told you,
[38:38] [Inaudible]
[38:39] will be
[38:41] [Inaudible]
[38:44] and everybody is invited to come
[38:48] to
[38:49] [Inaudible]
[38:50] .
[38:51] And yes, we as we both have to
[38:55] identify yourself
[38:57] [Inaudible]
[38:58] I'm sure that you will be able
[39:00] to tell whether
[39:04] [Inaudible]
[39:05] and so thank you very much.
[39:07] [Inaudible]
[39:11] - Les inscriptions.
[39:13] [Inaudible]
[39:19] -
[39:21] -
[39:23] - So it's very important that
[39:26] you actually register first to
[39:28] be able to
[39:33] [Inaudible]
[39:34] and have a preferred seat at the
[39:36] [Inaudible]
[39:37] .
[39:38] Please make sure --
[39:43] align with the
[39:44] [Inaudible]
[39:53] [Inaudible]
[39:57] and thank you very much, and see
[40:02] next month.
[40:04] I will not be here next month,
[40:06] and so
[40:08] [Inaudible]
[40:09] will be presiding the meeting.