[0:06] Bienvenue à la séance du conseil
[0:10] municipal de Beaconsfield du
[0:13] lundi 23 septembre.
[0:16] Welcome to the regular meeting
[0:20] of the municipal council of
[0:22] Beaconsfield of Monday,
[0:23] September 23. And now, we will
[0:27] accept the agenda.
[0:30] - Adoption de l'ordre du jour de
[0:31] la séance ordinaire de la Ville
[0:32] de Beaconsfield du 23 septembre
[0:33] 2024.
[0:36] >>
[0:37] Welcome to our meeting and now,
[0:38] you can say whatever you want
[0:39] and give us some report on the
[0:40] activities in Beaconsfield.
[0:41] - Je propose.
[0:42] - J'appuie.
[0:43] - En faveur.
[0:44] - À l'unanimité.
[0:45] - Merci. Nous avons notre
[0:46] nouveau commandant de PDQ un
[0:49] avec nous ce soir.
[1:01] >> Well, thank you for having me
[1:04] tonight. - Merci de me recevoir
[1:06] ce soir. Pour le bilan de la
[1:08] criminalité...
[1:09] For the review of the crime. -
[1:12] Vous n'êtes sans savoir qu'une
[1:13] opération au niveau des écoles
[1:14] qui ont été faites, donc en nom
[1:19] en a un
[1:51] ... Ça survient justement dans
[1:53] cette nouvelle ressource-là. Au
[1:55] niveau de la criminalité pour
[1:57] Beaconsfield, merci pour la
[1:59] période encore visé depuis les
[2:01] derniers conseil. Un rapport
[2:03] d'extorsion, une capacité
[2:05] affaiblie et un voies de fait.
[2:10] That's about it for the review
[2:11] of the crime, so thank you for
[2:13] your confidence. You may call me
[2:17] out or my agent at -- at anytime
[2:20] or you can reach the station one
[2:23] at PDQ1 at spvm.qc.ca. Be
[2:28] assured that we are concerned
[2:32] about any circumstances any
[2:35] questions for the commander
[2:36] while he's here? Je vais le dire
[2:37] en français... pleins que vous
[2:38] pouvez nous faire au PQ un et
[2:40] vous pouvez passer toujours pas
[2:41] le site Internet et mes agents
[2:43] vont faire un plaisir de vous
[2:44] répondre dans les plus brefs
[2:45] délais. Avez-vous des questions?
[2:48] - Merci commandant. Est-ce qu'il
[2:50] y a des questions?
[2:57] Yeah, if you want to go to the
[3:01] microphone, because this is
[3:02] being recorded. So, you have to
[3:05] be at the mic to ask questions.
[3:10] >> I have a question regarding a
[3:13] security after our flood.
[3:14] >> Could you identify who you
[3:16] are?
[3:17] >> I'm sorry? Okay, my name is
[3:20] Maria Harrison and I live on
[3:22] tower street. I was affected by
[3:24] the flood. I have a question
[3:27] about security because our
[3:30] garage doors were damaged. The
[3:33] you understand? Okay, the garage
[3:35] doors were damaged and we're
[3:36] still waiting to have them
[3:38] repaired. And they can easily be
[3:42] lifted up and have access into
[3:43] our homes, and we can't live
[3:45] there at the moment because we
[3:47] have no hot water and we're
[3:49] waiting for the repairs to be
[3:52] done. So, I'm asking that maybe
[3:55] or somehow, we can get some
[3:57] extra security in that area
[3:59] until we get things repaired and
[4:01] things are more, our homes are
[4:03] more secure.
[4:11] On ne connaît pas votre secteur
[4:12] où vous l'avez eu l'inondation.
[4:15] Where is that exactly?
[4:17] Hockey. >>
[4:18] [Inaudible]
[4:19] C'est sûr qu'il y a des
[4:20] patrouilles qui sont la jour et
[4:21] nuit. On a présentement plus
[4:22] d'effectifs sur la route, les
[4:24] vacances sont finis. Oui,
[4:26] effectivement, il y a des
[4:27] patrouilles dans le secteur.
[4:28] Est-ce qu'on va faire plus de
[4:29] patrouille parce que votre
[4:31] maison n'est pas sécurisé?
[4:32] Peut-être communiquer avec vos
[4:33] assurances souvent d'une autre
[4:34] façon s'il y a moins ces...
[4:36] moyens de sécuriser la maison.
[4:37] Mais c'est sûr qu'on est dans le
[4:38] coin. Si jamais vous voyez en
[4:40] comportement suspicieux ou
[4:41] quelque chose que vous n'aimez
[4:42] pas, vous savez que vous allez
[4:43] quitter pour un bon moment, vous
[4:45] pouvez communiquer avec le poste
[4:46] de police. À ce moment-là, on va
[4:48] s'assurer d'avoir une attention
[4:49] spéciale à cet endroit-là.
[4:50] Également, la sécurité publique
[4:52] qui fait des patrouilles.
[4:55] - Merci! If you have another
[5:00] question.
[5:07] >> Nora Graham on Creswell. You
[5:10] mentioned you are in the
[5:12] schools. Did you give safety
[5:15] tips to the children?
[5:19] Est-ce que vous m'entendez bien
[5:21] au...
[5:22] (inaudible)
[5:23] ?
[5:24] - On enregistre.
[5:25] - Oui, effectivement. Nos agents
[5:26] sociaux communautaires se sont
[5:27] promenées dans tous les écoles.
[5:29] Et puis, ils ont parlé justement
[5:30] avec les professeurs, avec les
[5:32] élèves, ils ont été présents
[5:33] partant toute la période que
[5:34] j'ai nommé. On va continuer tout
[5:36] le long de l'année des très
[5:37] présents au niveau des écoles
[5:38] pour donner justement des règles
[5:39] de sécurité au niveau de la
[5:41] sécurité routière. Mais
[5:42] également les sensibiliser au
[5:43] niveau de la drogue, les
[5:44] comportements à risque et les
[5:45] voies d'effets, etc.... C'est
[5:50] une très bonne suggestion. >>
[5:51] Okay, for safety on the roads,
[5:54] have you impressed on the
[5:56] children that if there are no
[5:57] sidewalks, they should be
[5:59] walking facing traffic? Because
[6:02] often, even the adults, they're
[6:06] walking with their backs to the
[6:08] traffic. You cannot hear an
[6:09] electric car. I stop and I tell
[6:12] them, but they don't listen.
[6:14] Maybe if you impress on them,
[6:16] they will listen and the kids
[6:17] will tell their parents.
[6:23] Je vais vérifier avec mes agents
[6:24] sociaux communautaires et je
[6:25] vous reviens avec les conseils.
[6:27] Merci pour le commentaire. >>
[6:30] Thank you. Any other questions
[6:33] for the commander?
[6:34] D'autres questions au
[6:35] commandant? >> Yeah, go to the
[6:40] mic, please. No, this is just a
[6:48] police question.
[6:55] Alors, bonsoir à tous, à toutes
[6:59] et à tous. Avant de commencer,
[7:03] j'aimerais prendre un moment
[7:05] pour penser à celles et ceux qui
[7:08] ont subi des dommages importants
[7:11] à la suite de la tempête Debbie.
[7:14] Au début du mois d'août... en
[7:17] moins de 48 heures, cette
[7:20] tempête a déversé une quantité
[7:22] incroyable de pluie. Nous à
[7:26] Simon quand environ 700 maisons
[7:28] ont été affectées. I would also
[7:33] like to mention that some of us,
[7:35] including myself, and several
[7:38] city employees, were affected by
[7:40] the flooding here in
[7:43] Beaconsfield. We, therefore,
[7:45] deeply understand the challenges
[7:47] that you have faced. Nous avons
[7:50] reçu de nombreuses questions par
[7:53] écrit pour la période des
[7:55] questions en lien avec les
[7:57] inondations. Je ne nommerai pas
[8:00] tous les questions, mais je vais
[8:02] nommer les noms de personnes
[8:03] qu'ils ont posé des questions.
[8:05] Il y a monsieur Stéphane poète
[8:07] Clarington, Richard Faucher,
[8:12] Elizabeth un
[8:13] (inaudible)
[8:14] tollé. Mairies Fresno
[8:16] (inaudible)
[8:17] Nicole Blanchard elle. J'espère
[8:21] que mes commentaires ainsi que
[8:23] le plan d'action que nous allons
[8:25] déposer plus tard ce soir
[8:28] répondront à plusieurs de ces
[8:30] préoccupations. The remnants of
[8:34] Hurricane Debbie made it the
[8:35] most destructive natural storm
[8:38] in Québec's history. With
[8:41] damages reaching over 2.4
[8:44] billion dollars. While the
[8:46] impact varied across different
[8:49] regions, Beaconsfield was hit
[8:51] particularly hard. Il est tombé
[8:55] 170 millimètres de pluie, ici,
[8:59] avec Quenneville, 9 août. À
[9:01] d'autres endroits, comme dans
[9:02] Lanaudière, plus de 220
[9:05] millimètres sont tombés. Pour
[9:08] vous donner une idée, la tempête
[9:11] de 1987 qui avait inondé
[9:14] Montréal et l'autoroute Décarie
[9:17] avait apporté 129 millimètres de
[9:20] pluie. Debbie a presque doublé
[9:22] cette quantité. Experts tell us
[9:27] these extreme weather events are
[9:29] going to be more frequent.
[9:32] Climate change is the main
[9:34] reason. These rapid changes in
[9:36] the weather are causing natural
[9:39] disasters that our cities and
[9:42] infrastructure and homes just
[9:43] are not built to handle. C'est
[9:48] pourquoi il est essentiel de
[9:49] faire tout notre possible pour
[9:51] limiter les dégâts. Mais même
[9:55] avec tous les améliorations que
[9:57] nous mettrons en place, il y
[10:00] aura encore des impacts
[10:03] importants, la force et la
[10:04] fréquence des tempêtes de vent,
[10:06] de pluie, de neige et des
[10:08] verglas cause des problèmes ici,
[10:11] au Canada et partout dans le
[10:15] monde. We must act now to reduce
[10:17] the impact of these problems
[10:19] wherever we can. Over the last
[10:22] five years, we have not only
[10:24] carried out regular maintenance
[10:26] programs on our infrastructure,
[10:29] but we have also invested over
[10:32] $10 million to improve our
[10:36] stormwater and sanitary sewers.
[10:39] While these improvements have
[10:41] helped reduce some of the
[10:42] damage, it's clear that more
[10:45] will need to be done to handle
[10:47] future storms. Ainsi, malgré nos
[10:51] efforts et ce que vous faites
[10:53] chez vous, ces catastrophes
[10:55] risquent de se reproduire. Nous
[10:58] devons nous préparer pour
[10:59] minimiser les dégâts, organiser
[11:01] des interventions rapides et
[11:04] sécuritaires et planifier des
[11:06] opérations d'aide efficace en
[11:08] tout temps et en toutes
[11:10] circonstances. Our team is and
[11:14] will remain vigilant, ready, and
[11:17] organized. I want to
[11:19] congratulate our entire
[11:20] municipal team, led by director
[11:23] general Patry swallow for the
[11:26] incredible work they have done.
[11:28] For after the rain stopped, they
[11:30] worked tirelessly and organize
[11:33] 18 days of collections between
[11:36] August the 14th and September
[11:37] the 4th, plus five extra debris
[11:42] pick ups between September the
[11:44] 6th and 19th. It took over 230
[11:51] truckloads term move 1233 tons
[11:54] of material. To put that into
[11:58] perspective, but they did, in
[12:01] three weeks, what we typically
[12:03] do in four months. Les dommages
[12:07] ont été si importants que nous
[12:09] avons reçu 430 des dont 27 était
[12:16] hors-délais, mais nous les avons
[12:17] quand même pris en considération
[12:18] et référer à nos experts en
[12:21] sinistres vu les circonstances
[12:23] exceptionnelles. Le gouvernement
[12:26] du Québec a déjà prévu adapter
[12:28] son programme d'aide pour cet
[12:31] événement. Ce qui,
[12:35] souhaitons-le, compenseront de
[12:36] nombreuses victimes. De notre
[12:38] côté, nous allons continuer à
[12:39] identifier les zones les plus
[12:41] vulnérables aux inondations et
[12:43] explorer des solutions
[12:46] novatrices pour contrer ces
[12:47] événements extrêmes. Tonight, we
[12:52] will table an action plan to
[12:55] make our community more
[12:57] resilient to extreme weather.
[13:00] This is item 60.2 on the agenda.
[13:04] The plan includes an analysis of
[13:08] the most affected areas, public
[13:11] awareness campaigns, and
[13:14] sustainable solutions to protect
[13:16] both our infrastructure and
[13:19] homes. We are also aiming at
[13:22] developing mutual aid scenarios
[13:24] with neighbouring cities to
[13:26] share best practices and support
[13:28] each other when necessary. With
[13:32] this plan will be made public
[13:34] and will be available on the
[13:36] City's website by Wednesday of
[13:39] this week. We will so, that was
[13:41] an answer to the questions that
[13:42] were related to the flooding and
[13:43] we have another person that sent
[13:44] us a written question, Madam
[13:45] Nicole Saint Andrew. Nous
[13:46] continuerons à agir pour
[13:47] prévenir les impacts de ces
[13:48] événements naturels, tout en
[13:49] sachant qu'il est impossible de
[13:50] les empêcher. Mais nous ferons
[13:51] tout ce qui est en notre pouvoir
[13:53] pour limiter les dégâts. Tant
[13:56] pour vous propriétés que pour
[13:59] nous, nos infrastructures
[14:02] municipales.
[14:21] Ma dame Nicole Colorado. I will
[14:26] summarize her questions. It's
[14:29] regarding the financing of
[14:31] friends for mental health.
[14:34] Regarding the demolition process
[14:37] and regarding the annex a hiring
[14:39] for public works, animal
[14:42] services for all animals. Madame
[14:45] Colorado... Corado d'autres
[14:46] questions? Madame we will refer
[14:48] your questions to the
[14:50] administration and they will
[14:51] follow up with you on your
[14:54] questions. Thank you. And now,
[14:57] we're up to the questions period
[15:00] on the floor.
[15:06] >> -- 171 Westcroft. With regard
[15:09] to item 30.8 in the agenda, on
[15:13] behalf of West Island citizen
[15:16] advocacy, I would like to thank
[15:18] you for your contribution to our
[15:22] organization. We use a very
[15:24] wisely. Thank you.
[15:26] >> Thank you very much.
[15:33] Any other questions?
[15:36] Non.
[15:42] - Bonsoir à tous. Pour moi, ma
[15:44] question...
[15:46] - Donnez votre nom et votre
[15:47] adresse si vous plaît.
[15:48] - Oui, Johanne Gauthier.
[15:50] L'adresse: 198 s'Cunningham à
[15:53] Beaconsfield. Ma question est
[15:54] pour les permis de
[15:55] stationnement. J'aimerais
[15:57] vraiment essayer d'expliquer un
[15:58] petit peu notre situation, j'ai
[16:01] été très chanceux d'avoir notre
[16:03] conseil heure du district six
[16:04] qui m'a un petit peu aidé avec
[16:07] toutes mes questionnements, mais
[16:08] elle m'a suggéré de venir ici
[16:10] pour vous en parler. Nous
[16:13] habitons serait une erreur qui
[16:14] est quand même pas très
[16:16] passantes, c'est une loupe et si
[16:18] les gens viennent autour ce
[16:19] n'est pas une rue principale. En
[16:24] fait, on habite ici depuis 19
[16:26] ans et on a des jeunes enfants
[16:28] qui sont devenus maintenant des
[16:29] jeunes adultes et on a vraiment
[16:30] un gros problème dans la
[16:32] dernière année. On a toujours
[16:34] suivi les règles, on est
[16:36] contents avec Beaconsfield, on
[16:37] adore habiter ici, mais là on se
[16:39] fait dire qu'on a droit à trois
[16:42] stationnements par année par
[16:44] auto. Alors, vous comprendrez
[16:46] bien que dans notre côté à nous,
[16:48] on essaye d'aider nos jeunes
[16:49] adultes parce qu'ils sont les
[16:50] universités ou aux collèges et
[16:52] ils ont des emplois, bien sûr
[16:54] ils ont un véhicule. On est mal
[16:56] pris parce que tous nos voisins
[16:57] essaient de nous aider, mais
[17:00] finalement je n'ai pas d'aide
[17:02] vraiment dans les derniers mois.
[17:04] Mes voisins essaient de prendre
[17:05] les autos de mes enfants, mais
[17:07] en même temps on se dit: ça n'a
[17:08] pas de bon sens que... on
[17:11] comprend, quand c'est l'hiver,
[17:12] tout le monde autour veut nous
[17:13] aider. Mais là, on a trop de
[17:16] véhicules pour notre famille et
[17:17] on se dit: on exagère pas
[17:20] vraiment. C'est que juste entre
[17:22] 18 et 23 ans, c'est normal
[17:24] qu'ils aient leur propre
[17:25] véhicule. C'est normal qu'il
[17:26] reste encore à la maison et on
[17:27] veut les aider ne veut pas leur
[17:29] dire: finalement, on ne peut pas
[17:30] te garder à la maison parce que
[17:31] tu as un véhicule et ça ne fit
[17:33] plus dans le stationnement. Je
[17:36] veux juste savoir comment on
[17:37] peut procéder, à qui je peux
[17:39] demander de l'aide. J'ai demandé
[17:40] à la sécurité publique et ils
[17:42] ont dit dernièrement: madame, je
[17:44] suis désolé, mais vous avez trop
[17:46] demandé. J'ai dit: je ne
[17:47] comprends pas que j'ai trop
[17:49] demandé. Je pensais qu'on avait
[17:50] juste demandé justement. On est
[17:52] gentil, on appelle même s'il est
[17:54] 10 heures, 11 heures le soir.
[17:55] Les gens arrivent avec un permis
[17:57] et pour les visiteurs, c'est sûr
[17:58] que ça se passe bien parce que
[18:00] nos deux familles sont de loin,
[18:01] mais ils ne viennent jamais plus
[18:02] que trois fois par année nous
[18:04] visiter. On est correct de ce
[18:05] côté-là. Mais comment on peut
[18:08] faire pour aider nos enfants qui
[18:09] sont devenus des jeunes adultes
[18:12] et qui ont besoin d'un espace?
[18:14] Je me dis: l'hiver, c'est
[18:16] normal. Je comprends le
[18:17] déménagement. Mais pourquoi dans
[18:18] les autres saisons c'est si
[18:20] sévère et pourquoi est-ce que
[18:22] quand j'ai vu les avoir de
[18:23] l'aide, tout ce on dit à la
[18:24] sécurité publique: désolé, il y
[18:26] a des règles. Moi, je ne suis
[18:28] pas bien là-dedans. Je
[18:29] comprends, j'ai toujours
[18:30] respecté tous les règles de
[18:31] Beaconsfield, mais je ne trouve
[18:32] pas ça correct que noterais
[18:34] famille... on n'est pas les
[18:35] seuls en fait avoir une famille
[18:38] qui a beaucoup d'enfants et que
[18:39] les enfants commencent aussi
[18:40] avoir des partenaires. On se
[18:42] dit: ce n'est pas qu'on va
[18:43] accueillir un village au
[18:44] complet, mais il faut régler
[18:47] avec nos enfants. Il faut qu'on
[18:49] leur dise qu'ils ont un espace.
[18:51] - Pour la procédure pour
[18:54] regarder cette situation-là, je
[18:56] vais demander pour la présidence
[18:58] du comité de trafic de peut-être
[19:01] expliquer la procédure comment
[19:02] est-ce qu'elle peut faire sa
[19:04] demande et puis, ce sera
[19:06] considéré par le comité.
[19:09] - Alors, Madame, écoutez,
[19:12] malheureusement ou heureusement,
[19:13] dépendamment du point de
[19:14] victoire ce qui est de la
[19:15] procédure, présentement, elle
[19:17] est contenue dans le règlement
[19:19] municipal. Alors, vous faites
[19:21] bien de venir ici et de vous
[19:22] adresser à nous parce que la
[19:24] façon de procéder, si on veut
[19:26] changer les règles, c'est en
[19:27] s'adressant au conseil comme
[19:28] vous le faites ce soir.
[19:31] Éventuellement, ce que ça peut
[19:32] faire c'est amener une
[19:33] modification du règlement
[19:34] municipal pour permettre le cas
[19:36] échéant, peut-être. Je ne peux
[19:38] pas vous faire des promesses
[19:40] évidemment, mais amener une
[19:41] modification du règlement qui
[19:43] permettrait d'élargir, soit les
[19:45] heures de stationnement permis
[19:47] ou le nombre de permis qui
[19:48] peuvent être très émus dans une
[19:49] année. Autrement,
[19:52] l'administration malheureusement
[19:53] ne peut pas déborder de ce que
[19:55] le règlement prévoit. Alors,
[19:57] c'est une discussion qu'il
[19:58] faudrait qu'il y a à l'interne
[19:59] avec l'administration et le
[20:01] conseil pour voir dans un
[20:03] premier temps si des
[20:04] modifications sont effectivement
[20:07] requis et de quelle façon si on
[20:08] fait des modifications, on les
[20:10] fait de façon les plus
[20:13] efficiente, les plus efficaces
[20:15] pour tout le monde pour la
[20:16] communauté dans l'ensemble.
[20:18] - Ça pourrait commencer par une
[20:22] demande au comité de trafic qui
[20:25] ensuite, fera en recommandation
[20:26] au conseil et le Conseil
[20:28] décidera à ce moment-là.
[20:32] - On pourrait regarder
[20:33] effectivement de cette façon-là
[20:36] et on a une rencontre du comité
[20:37] sur la circulation à la fin du
[20:40] mois d'octobre. Honnêtement, par
[20:43] contre, je ne peux pas vous
[20:44] garantir que ce sujet-là va être
[20:45] à l'ordre du jour à ce moment-là
[20:47] parce qu'on a déjà des demandes
[20:48] qui émanent depuis quelques mois
[20:50] qui pourraient peut-être être
[20:52] traités. Mais on peut en prendre
[20:53] note et vérifier spécifiquement
[20:57] de quelle façon ça peut être
[20:59] modifié, si ça doit être
[21:00] modifié.
[21:01] - J'apprécierais parce que
[21:02] surtout quand on vient
[21:03] rencontrer des gens et qu'on
[21:04] explique notre cas et que c'est
[21:06] notre propre famille, on habite
[21:08] à cette adresse-là depuis
[21:09] presque 20 ans et qu'on me dit:
[21:11] désolé, je ne peux pas. Pour
[21:13] moi, c'est inconcevable qu'on ne
[21:15] me dise pas: on va voir ce qu'on
[21:16] peut faire et on me dit juste
[21:17] non, il y a des règlements.
[21:18] C'est comme ça, on suit le
[21:20] règlement. Sincèrement, ça cause
[21:22] des frustrations incroyables
[21:24] parce qu'on se dit: on ne se
[21:25] sent pas vraiment écouté et on
[21:28] ne sent pas qu'il y a quelqu'un
[21:30] qui veut nous aider. C'était
[21:32] juste comme: non, c'est comme
[21:33] ça. Je m'excuse, mais on ne
[21:35] s'ACTRA pas à la maison. On se
[21:36] dit: ça n'a pas de bon sens que
[21:38] c'est une famille qui habite. Là
[21:39] on ne parle pas que c'est plein
[21:41] de visiteurs qui arrivent.
[21:43] - Rappelez-moi votre nom de
[21:44] famille si vous plaît?
[21:45] - Gauthier. Est-ce que la
[21:49] conseillère Alexopoulos à vos
[21:50] coordonnées? Elle pourra mettre
[21:52] l'adresse courriel et j'entrer
[21:54] en contact avec. Vous
[21:55] - Ce serait gentil. Je veux être
[21:57] sûr que quelqu'un va me revenir
[21:58] là-dessus. Je comprends que ce
[22:00] ne sera pas tout de suite, mais
[22:01] au moins que c'est pris en
[22:02] considération et qu'on va
[22:03] avoir...
[22:04] - On va passer par le comité de
[22:06] trafic qui va regarder votre
[22:10] demande et ensuite, le comité
[22:14] fera une recommandation au
[22:17] conseil et le Conseil décidera à
[22:18] ce moment-là si oui, selon la
[22:21] recommandation,
[22:23] (inaudible)
[22:24] .
[22:25] - Est-ce que je peux poser une
[22:26] dernière question? À quel moment
[22:27] ou justement par rapport au
[22:28] déneigement... on sait qu'il n'y
[22:29] aura pas de la chute de suite,
[22:30] mais c'est quoi la
[22:32] réglementation? Est-ce que c'est
[22:33] fin octobre ou novembre ou ils
[22:35] disent qu'on n'a plus du tout
[22:36] droit de stationner dans la
[22:38] nuit, même avec un permis? C'est
[22:40] quand?
[22:41] - Je pense que ça commence en
[22:43] novembre.
[22:45] - Fin octobre.
[22:48] (inaudible)
[22:54] - On ne peut jamais stationner
[22:55] la nuit au complet, sauf avec un
[22:58] permis. Mais s'il neige, il y a
[23:00] un temps requis après lequel on
[23:02] ne peut pas se stationner quand
[23:04] il va avoir des opérations pour
[23:06] déneiger.
[23:07] - Je ne savais plus si c'était
[23:09] fait à octobre.
[23:11] - Ce n'est pas une question de
[23:13] date, c'est une question de
[23:14] tempête de neige il y a un délai
[23:15] pour quand la tempête commence,
[23:17] terminé après ça, il y a un
[23:19] délai respecté. C'est quand il
[23:21] neige. Il n'y a pas de date.
[23:22] - O.K., Mais on sait quand on
[23:24] normal, mi-octobre... on est
[23:27] correct.
[23:28] - Merci beaucoup de m'avoir
[23:29] écouté désolé pour les gens qui
[23:30] ont vécu les inondations. Je
[23:31] sais que ce n'est vraiment pas
[23:34] évident. Merci beaucoup,
[23:36] j'apprécie. Je ne veux pas être
[23:37] impoli, je suis obligé de
[23:39] quitter bientôt, mais j'apprécie
[23:41] énormément votre écoute.
[23:42] - Merci! Merci!
[23:50] >> Hi, my name is Desmond she
[23:51] for, 30 -- I had written a
[23:52] letter a couple months ago.
[23:57] J'ai fini les réformes... je
[23:58] m'excuse. I had a meeting with
[23:59] Mr. Chabot urban planning.
[24:02] Regarding property I own on
[24:04] lakeshore road. And I was told
[24:07] there was supposed to be
[24:08] addressed in August with but I
[24:12] was told, Mister Mayor, you are
[24:14] on vacation and supposedly it
[24:16] was going to be talked about at
[24:17] this meeting. I just wanted to
[24:18] know where I stand in regards to
[24:24] a park tax or an expropriation
[24:27] of the land because I planted
[24:29] develop that one, and I
[24:30] addressed a letter to the
[24:31] Council and I don't know if you
[24:35] guys had a chance to look at it.
[24:38] I took a shot. I probably know
[24:41] what the answer is but I just
[24:43] wanted here because I haven't
[24:45] had an answer as of yet. Mr. the
[24:50] mayor is not --
[24:51] >> No, I'm not aware, so, you
[24:54] know, I'm listening to you and I
[24:56] have no idea about the
[24:58] situation. Do we know?
[25:01] >> I can shed some light on it.
[25:03] We did receive your letter and
[25:05] we had a discussion about it but
[25:06] you should be receiving a
[25:08] communication back.
[25:09] >> Well, we will let Patrice.
[25:13] >> Yeah, because of some
[25:15] vacations lately, among the
[25:17] council members, -- talk with
[25:20] them all together to come to a
[25:22] conclusion as to your request if
[25:24] you're going to see the 10% of
[25:25] the land, if you're going to pay
[25:27] the park fee. That's your
[25:29] request, if I remember because
[25:31] our first inclination was to
[25:33] have the land but you came back
[25:36] with that letter at the Council
[25:38] to consider if it would be a
[25:42] park fee instead of seeding land
[25:44] to the city. You prefer to pay
[25:46] the park fee, so not everyone
[25:48] has mentioned --
[25:49] >> Mister Mayor, I understand
[25:52] there's a property that I own on
[25:54] Lakeshore and my goal is to
[25:56] develop it. And as I've
[25:58] developed other houses in the
[25:59] city, I understand that there is
[26:01] a park tax that has to be paid
[26:03] which is 10% of the land value.
[26:07] And there is a clause in the
[26:08] bylaw that the City has the
[26:09] right to expropriate 10% of the
[26:12] land. So, --
[26:14] >> It's not expropriation. It's
[26:17] the sides of property, let's say
[26:19] it's 10,000 square feet, well,
[26:21] the city is entitled to say, we
[26:23] don't want the money, we want
[26:25] 1000 feet. It's not
[26:26] expropriation, it's just the way
[26:28] the owner would pay the park
[26:31] fee. So, it's money or land.
[26:34] That's the question and we are
[26:35] going to come back to you on
[26:36] that.
[26:37] >> I was okay with either or
[26:38] because out of my control but
[26:41] when I had estimates done for
[26:42] the City to take the 10% of the
[26:45] land away, I don't know, it's
[26:47] not expropriation, to take the
[26:50] 10% instead of the cash, it's
[26:54] costing a very high amount
[26:55] because there's demolition of a
[26:57] garage, there's a new fence that
[26:58] has to go up, those soil testing
[27:00] that the City and I just, you
[27:04] know, there are all these
[27:06] things.
[27:09] >> We receive your letter.
[27:11] >> Okay, because I wrote it a
[27:12] couple months ago, that's all. I
[27:14] was hoping to, I was told I was
[27:16] going to have an answer today.
[27:18] >> Well, we will get back to you
[27:20] but I believe that it's probably
[27:21] going to be the 10% money
[27:25] instead of the land.
[27:27] >> That would --
[27:29] >> But I have to make sure that
[27:33] that's the agreement.
[27:35] >> It's a large sum of money and
[27:40] I would just like you, Mister
[27:41] Mayor, if you had a chance to
[27:42] take two minutes and read the
[27:44] letter you wrote, and you will
[27:46] see the things, the
[27:49] circumstances of which it's been
[27:51] discussed. I know some of the
[27:53] councillors are very much for
[27:55] taking the land and it's, you
[27:58] know, I will leave it with you.
[28:00] >> We will get back to you.
[28:01] >> Thank you very much.
[28:02] >> Thank you for bringing it up.
[28:07] >> Hello. My name is Marie for
[28:10] no. I'm a homeowner at 375 elm.
[28:13] There are nine of us here from
[28:17] 375 elm or corner elm and tower.
[28:21] The town houses that were
[28:23] completely devastated and still
[28:25] continue to be, not only as a
[28:27] result of the event that you
[28:28] just described, but also this is
[28:30] not our first go around. So,
[28:33] I've submitted a few questions
[28:35] and I know you'll be going over.
[28:37] And so have some of my friends.
[28:42] What I would like to share with
[28:43] you today, though, and as I
[28:45] speak on the mic, is that as you
[28:48] are speaking about how this is,
[28:50] you know, a lot to do with
[28:52] climate and the hurricane that
[28:54] just took place, we, at the
[28:56] corner of tower and alum, I've
[28:58] had this issue. I won't say long
[29:00] before climate issues because
[29:01] that's been going on for quite
[29:02] some time but there has been a
[29:04] repetitive pattern. So, with all
[29:06] due respect, while this was
[29:09] clearly the worst, there has
[29:10] been a pattern of reputation
[29:11] that's taken place across these
[29:15] properties that I think
[29:17] disrespects what we've been
[29:18] living through just as a simple
[29:21] result of this. So, that needs
[29:22] to be addressed and through the
[29:24] question, we respectfully ask
[29:25] for an audience with yourself,
[29:28] whoever you deem necessary and
[29:30] Peggy to address this. What I
[29:32] would like to address
[29:33] immediately though, because I
[29:34] know some of my friends also
[29:35] have some questions, is the fact
[29:37] that the parking is going to
[29:38] become an issue and will
[29:40] continue to be an issue, and is
[29:41] an issue. As many of us can't
[29:45] park in our garages and for
[29:47] different reasons, we will
[29:48] choose not to continue parking
[29:49] in our garages as the rainy
[29:51] season continues into fall. We
[29:53] have a limit as far as our
[29:55] insurance policies are concerned
[29:56] and also a personal expense
[29:58] limit where we can't just keep
[29:59] replacing our cars every two
[30:01] years. And with the upcoming
[30:04] changes in the parking
[30:06] restrictions, because the snow
[30:07] clearance and ongoing garbage
[30:09] issue which I know that I've
[30:10] spoken to Doug -- about with
[30:13] limited tolerance, we need to
[30:16] address what's going to be
[30:17] happening. In terms of parking,
[30:19] what other solutions can be
[30:21] made? As we enter a rainy
[30:24] season, as it's been proven
[30:25] through history, we have an
[30:27] issue with our underground
[30:29] garages as they form a mouth and
[30:31] an intake for water. We're at a
[30:33] point now where Mary many of us
[30:34] in our insurance policies have,
[30:36] they've been exhausted. So, we
[30:38] need actually concrete
[30:40] resolutions and solutions,
[30:42] starting with parking, starting
[30:44] with tolerance when it comes to
[30:46] parking. Revision of that but
[30:49] also, I am hoping that in the
[30:50] questions that you address, that
[30:52] we've all written, that you will
[30:54] provide us with an audience that
[30:56] we can actually address what's
[30:58] particularly happening. Not to
[31:00] forget what's happening across
[31:02] Beaconsfield but it is sizeable.
[31:03] There are 22 homes. A number of
[31:05] which continue to be uninhabited
[31:07] because of deplorable living
[31:08] conditions that are not
[31:10] representative of a first world
[31:11] country, let alone Beaconsfield.
[31:13] And I think that something that
[31:14] we should actually be not
[31:16] satisfied with. It's
[31:17] unacceptable and it's actually,
[31:19] you know, disgusting. Oxford and
[31:21] other countries would be
[31:22] addressing this differently.
[31:26] >> I will ask our director
[31:28] general to answer your question.
[31:31] >> Okay.
[31:32] >> Yeah, real sorry for what
[31:33] you're going through for
[31:34] everyone. It's horrible. I know
[31:37] you had issues in 2022 and I
[31:40] believe that some of the work
[31:41] that we did this year was very
[31:43] helpful. We spent -- point $5
[31:46] million in that area.
[31:47] >> Wasn't helpful, sorry.
[31:56] >> If you do not allow him to
[31:58] answer the question and be
[32:00] interfering with his questions,
[32:02] he will not answer. So, would
[32:04] you please stop and let him
[32:06] answer the question?
[32:14] >> So, we had a severe rain in
[32:17] July. I think it was close,
[32:19] around 60 millimetres,
[32:20] everything went well, we were
[32:21] very happy with that. Of course,
[32:23] August nine was horrible and
[32:27] extreme weather. In one hour, it
[32:28] was 50 or 60 millimetres in one
[32:31] hour. That really the ground was
[32:35] all wet already. We had already
[32:37] received about 80 millimetres
[32:38] and then around five PM, another
[32:40] 50. So, that was very
[32:42] challenging for you guys first
[32:44] and then for us in the city, so
[32:47] tonight, we are tabling your
[32:49] report. Hopefully that's going
[32:50] to bring us light to some
[32:53] actions that the City could take
[32:54] and hopefully also for residents
[32:57] to improve their own homes at
[32:59] certain areas. I know you had
[33:01] done some work to prepare for
[33:03] that but this storm was way over
[33:05] our capacity. And we are, for
[33:09] example, I know this week, we're
[33:10] meeting with the one of our
[33:13] consultant firms that's been
[33:14] doing a study. Hopefully we get
[33:17] some results before the end of
[33:19] the year of recommendations, how
[33:20] to improve. We want to ask them
[33:22] to add all the information that
[33:26] we gathered from the flood into
[33:29] this report, to help us get
[33:31] better recommendations and a
[33:33] better know how. So, I don't
[33:35] think we'll get answers to
[33:36] everything that we're looking
[33:37] at. But hopefully, we will get
[33:39] some and that were able to
[33:41] improve some of our
[33:43] infrastructures in the near
[33:44] future. I don't think it is
[33:45] going to be done within a year.
[33:47] It's going to take a few years
[33:48] but there is some work that
[33:49] could be done to improve our
[33:52] infrastructure in the near
[33:53] future. About your specific
[33:54] situation there, the area and
[33:57] tower and elm, I have to
[33:59] understand a little better
[34:00] what's going on there to that
[34:01] intersection. I have to talk
[34:02] with our engineers but I would
[34:03] be happy to, you know, have a
[34:06] discussion with you and your
[34:07] neighbours at one point, just to
[34:09] explain, you know, how we see
[34:11] things and how we could
[34:12] hopefully improve your
[34:13] situation. I still need to get
[34:15] some reports on that data and
[34:18] better understanding of
[34:19] everything that was going on.
[34:21] It's been challenging, the last
[34:23] week has been very challenging
[34:24] for everyone here at the city
[34:25] and not as much as you guys, I
[34:28] understand that because you're
[34:30] mostly involved. We're looking
[34:31] at a technical point of view,
[34:32] how we can bring some relief to
[34:35] the people in that area. So,
[34:37] hopefully we can get that. I
[34:39] could give you my email address
[34:40] but if you write info at
[34:42] Beaconsfield, you know, and ask
[34:44] to talk to the director general,
[34:46] tell me what questions or
[34:48] concerns you like us to address
[34:49] and we could prepare something
[34:53] for you. I'm not sure in which
[34:55] timeframe but hopefully I could
[34:57] do that in a month, you know? In
[34:59] 3 to 6 next weeks, hopefully,
[35:01] depending on the information we
[35:02] will get but I will get back to
[35:04] you.
[35:05] >> Some of the questions will
[35:06] come out because they were
[35:07] submitted as part of this
[35:08] meeting, so I know you need to
[35:09] address them, right? That's what
[35:10] my understanding is when we put
[35:11] a question online at the W W W,
[35:14] right? So, some of whom will
[35:17] appear, am I mistaken? When it
[35:18] comes to the questions that we
[35:20] submit on the website prior to
[35:22] this meeting? And my being
[35:25] clear?
[35:28] >> You don't understand? So,
[35:30] prior to the meeting, we can
[35:34] ascribe our questions separate
[35:36] to the ones I'm asking tonight.
[35:38] Where all do those questions go
[35:40] and who addresses them and when?
[35:41] It's tonight, right?
[35:44] >> Here we have the question
[35:46] period, so
[35:47] [Inaudible]
[35:48] >> I'm not sure I understand.
[35:49] >> You mentioned my name but
[35:50] there was kind of very little --
[35:52] >> Are you talking about the
[35:54] questions -- well, I was hoping
[35:57] to answer them with my report
[36:00] tonight. So, those are the five
[36:02] questions that were written to
[36:05] us. Now, any other questions
[36:09] that goes to info at
[36:12] Beaconsfield, that's answered
[36:16] pretty promptly by, I believe,
[36:21] by Dominic, right? By Dominic,
[36:26] the clerk who answers those
[36:27] questions that info at
[36:29] Beaconsfield. She finds out the
[36:30] information and she replies with
[36:32] the information.
[36:34] >> Okay, there is somewhat
[36:36] complex. I don't know if they
[36:37] will be so black and white. It
[36:38] does require strategy. My other
[36:41] comment is, though, in the
[36:42] meantime while the rest of us
[36:44] continue to incur personal
[36:46] expenses as a result of this,
[36:48] and in some cases, you know,
[36:50] while Beaconsfield continues to
[36:51] do its analysis, it's features,
[36:53] and all the rest, we are paying
[36:55] out of pocket. Ongoing either
[36:57] through our insurance, or
[36:58] personal expenses, and ongoing
[37:00] as the climate issue is not
[37:04] getting any better, if that's
[37:05] what you want to call it. We
[37:07] have had issues prior to this.
[37:09] There is been recorded pattern
[37:10] and I'm just curious as to what
[37:14] happens for all of those
[37:15] expenses that we are incurring,
[37:16] and we will continue to do so in
[37:18] the foreseeable future as we
[37:21] wait for this to be hatched.
[37:26] >> Well, the City does not have
[37:27] any funding for people that are
[37:30] going through the government
[37:34] might have programs to which I
[37:35] stand, that's another question.
[37:36] Un sinistre.
[37:41] Not sure to which extent they
[37:43] would support people that went
[37:46] through that flood, for example.
[37:48] It depends on the series of
[37:49] conditions that I'm not aware of
[37:50] and I believe residents could
[37:53] apply directly to the government
[37:55] for that. The city is not
[37:57] involved.
[37:58] >> And how about the reduction
[37:59] in our property values? Because
[38:02] many of us have received letters
[38:03] from the City of Montréal
[38:05] approaching us with that.
[38:07] >> Where did you get that
[38:08] information about property
[38:09] value?
[38:10] >> Many of us got a letter
[38:11] directly from the City of
[38:12] Montréal with a file number,
[38:13] with a claim number, and we had
[38:16] a phone number to call where we
[38:18] were asked the extent of the
[38:21] damage done to our physical
[38:23] property. We have to send photos
[38:25] and because of that, they're
[38:27] going to be reducing our
[38:28] property values.
[38:30] >> Well, property valuation is
[38:33] not establish that way. Property
[38:35] valuation is established every
[38:36] three years and we are not aware
[38:39] of any program whatsoever right
[38:42] now to review or reevaluate any
[38:47] properties, whether it be in
[38:49] Beaconsfield, Kirkland, or
[38:50] anywhere else. And it's based on
[38:54] market price. It's not based on,
[38:57] you know, whatever else. So, I
[39:01] think that you got the wrong
[39:02] information because there is no
[39:05] reevaluation being taken place.
[39:06] >> I provided in my questions on
[39:09] the website the actual reference
[39:12] number and I invite you, Mayor
[39:15] Bourelle, to investigate that,
[39:17] because myself and others spoke
[39:18] to the City official and many of
[39:22] us all separately got the same
[39:24] message that they're going to be
[39:26] devaluing our homes as a result
[39:28] of it. So, there must be some
[39:29] exceptions going on. I'm
[39:31] concerned about zoning but the
[39:32] file number is there.
[39:33] >> We will look into that. Mr.
[39:39] Boileau will look into that but
[39:40] it would be extremely unusual
[39:42] for them to do this and I'm not
[39:44] aware of any reevaluation of any
[39:47] properties, whether it be
[39:48] Beaconsfield, Kirkland,
[39:51] Pointe-Claire or anywhere where
[39:53] there was a lot of flooding. I'm
[39:56] not aware of any reevaluation
[39:58] taking place. So, we will check
[40:01] it out but I dealt very much
[40:03] doubt very much that it will be
[40:05] done because it's based on
[40:07] market value. It's based on
[40:10] basically transactions that have
[40:12] taken place over the last two or
[40:14] three years. So, it is not based
[40:18] on the fact -- that you were
[40:21] flooded.
[40:22] >> You should have a
[40:23] conversation with him though.
[40:25] >> We will talk to Montréal and
[40:28] find out, for sure.
[40:29] >> Yeah, Mister Mayor, when we
[40:30] saw this, the day we wrote to
[40:33] the -- department and we're
[40:34] waiting back from them. We were
[40:36] surprised to see that.
[40:37] >> Okay, I can send you a
[40:38] photograph if you'd like a
[40:39] letter that every seat.
[40:40] >> You can't do the address
[40:42] there and ask it to be directed
[40:43] to me.
[40:44] >> My final question, will you
[40:45] be reevaluating the parking
[40:47] situation in the bylaws along
[40:50] elm? Because there is a shortage
[40:51] of a. We cannot all be parking
[40:53] at Montrose Park. There isn't
[40:54] always parking at Montrose Park.
[40:56] We're not all going to be
[40:59] trolling Montrose park to see
[41:00] when there is parking available.
[41:02] There needs to be something
[41:04] done. November 1st is coming. I
[41:06] don't think that it's reasonable
[41:08] at this point because it's not
[41:10] reasonable now and until there
[41:12] is a freeze and until we feel
[41:16] comfortable that our cars are
[41:17] not at risk, as our basements,
[41:20] we can move them, unfortunately,
[41:21] and a physical property. I mean,
[41:23] it's going to be a challenge for
[41:24] us to feel safe, comfortable,
[41:27] and that it's a trustworthy
[41:29] environment for us to place our
[41:33] cars. So, can you look into
[41:36] that?
[41:37] >> Yeah, we will be to be
[41:38] honest, I'm not sure there is an
[41:39] easy fix here. There's so much
[41:43] space and there are so many
[41:44] cars. So, on garbage day, we
[41:48] have to collect the garbage. So,
[41:51] that's difficult. You cannot
[41:52] park on the streets. I know
[41:53] someone mentioned they got, they
[41:55] gave so many tickets. It was
[41:57] very few, very few tickets.
[41:59] >> I was one of them.
[42:00] >> Sorry about that but it was
[42:02] very few tickets that were given
[42:03] out. Not tons of tickets. So, I
[42:07] have the data for my team and
[42:09] they've informed me they were
[42:10] being tolerant and I understand
[42:13] why they were doing that.
[42:15] >> I beg to differ but they
[42:17] apparently were told not to be
[42:18] tolerant.
[42:21] >> I think you have to let the
[42:22] rumours away.
[42:23] >> No, I spoke directly to Mr.
[42:25] Haas about that.
[42:26] >> Mr. Haas's job is not to be
[42:28] tolerant. He has to have the
[42:30] bylaws respected but if that was
[42:31] the case, if that was the case,
[42:33] sorry, Mister Mayor, could you
[42:34] give me a minute more? Just for
[42:36] information. For statistics. So,
[42:43] since August 9th, we gave six
[42:45] tickets. That's not bad in six
[42:48] weeks.
[42:49] >> Depends on who receives them
[42:50] I suppose and what that does to
[42:51] somebody who's already paying
[42:53] tens of thousands of dollars.
[42:54] >> One person got three tickets
[42:56] for two cards about the cars
[42:57] were kind of abandoned on the
[42:59] street. They can't move within
[43:00] 24 hours and we got a complaint
[43:02] from someone that the cars were
[43:03] parked there abandoned with flat
[43:06] tires. That does not help. One
[43:10] was on a fire hydrant so out of
[43:13] six tickets, that's not money.
[43:14] >> No, I guess it counts when
[43:16] it's you.
[43:17] >> Of course but that doesn't
[43:18] mean it's everyone and --
[43:20] >> I'm only talking about myself
[43:21] and actually, there's another
[43:22] person to.
[43:23] >> I believe you and it's
[43:25] frustrating to get a parking
[43:26] ticket, I know.
[43:28] >> So, I would like for it to be
[43:30] waived.
[43:31] >> We can't remove. If you think
[43:32] we were wrong, you have to go to
[43:34] court. We can't remove tickets,
[43:35] that's not the way it works.
[43:36] >> And those were based on, some
[43:38] of them were based on complaints
[43:40] that we got.
[43:42] >> Yeah, we got three residents
[43:45] I think.
[43:46] >> I was parked in front of a
[43:48] hedge, so I don't know who lives
[43:49] there, but yeah.
[43:50] >> We're not running after you
[43:52] guys to give tickets.
[43:54] >> I don't have any further
[43:56] questions, thank you.
[44:06] Bonjour. Pauline
[44:07] (inaudible)
[44:08] Gérard. Plusieurs savent, je
[44:10] suis présidente de la Société
[44:12] historique de Beaconsfield.
[44:13] J'aurais peut-être un certain et
[44:14] que les services...
[44:16] éclaircissement propos de la
[44:17] situation, surtout au coin de
[44:19] Hull. Cette maison, cette
[44:21] résidence est construit
[44:22] par-dessus un ruisseau. Alors,
[44:27] c'est compréhensible qu'il y a
[44:28] plus d'eau peut-être si le
[44:31] réussir n'a pas été bien drainé,
[44:33] s'il y a de l'obstruction pour
[44:34] que l'eau coule plus, ça fait un
[44:38] apport d'eau un peu plus grand
[44:40] et il y a plusieurs ruisseaux
[44:41] qui arrivent à cet endroit-là,
[44:43] Pierre ruisseau qui passe en
[44:44] dessous de la place que je
[44:47] pense, les tuyaux arrivent bien
[44:48] à cet endroit-là pour traverser
[44:50] la voie ferrée. Monsieur
[44:52] Boileau, peut-être qu'il
[44:53] faudrait regarder sur les cartes
[44:54] de la ville. Je ne sais pas s'il
[44:55] y a des cartes qui identifie où
[44:57] étaient les Russes sûrement
[44:58] qu'ils soient mis dans des
[44:59] tuyaux. J'ai même entendu dire
[45:01] qu'à certains ruisseaux n'aurait
[45:02] pas été mis dans les tuyaux,
[45:06] donc peut-être qu'ils sont
[45:10] encore...
[45:11] - Je ne suis pas certain qu'on a
[45:12] des cartes à des ruisseaux en
[45:13] tant qu'il était, les vieux
[45:15] réussi. Sûrement que
[45:16] (inaudible)
[45:17] effectivement, dans ces
[45:18] secteurs-là il n'y en avait un.
[45:19] En fait, la ville en tant que
[45:22] telle à 39 bassins de drainage
[45:24] sur les, donc à proviennent du
[45:27] nuage, trois trois vers le lac
[45:29] et un s'en va aux rues sur
[45:30] l'Anse-à-l'Orme. Il y en a trois
[45:31] qui se déversent vers le sud. On
[45:32] a 39 bassins de drainage
[45:35] jusqu'au côté sud, 36 qui se
[45:37] déversent au lac en fait. Ce
[45:39] n'est pas cinq, comme dynamique,
[45:41] ça prend de l'analyse, des
[45:43] mesures de Libye dans les
[45:46] conduites et tout, mais ça va
[45:47] faire partie des analyses qu'on
[45:48] va faire prochainement. C'est
[45:50] sûr qu'il y a des ruisseaux
[45:51] souterrain des anciennes
[45:54] rivières ou des réseaux comme
[45:55] vous, dites on sait qu'il y en a
[45:56] quelques-uns. Je ne suis pas sûr
[45:57] qu'on les connaît tous.
[45:58] - Six ont été mis dans des
[46:00] tuyaux, il devrait... ils ont
[46:03] été mis dans les travaux publics
[46:05] imagine. Il y avait aussi même
[46:08] un étant assez grand pour que
[46:09] les enfants aillent à la pêche
[46:11] un peu au nord de cet
[46:13] endroit-là. Alors, avec le
[46:14] temps, ça revient peut-être. Je
[46:19] sais qu'il y a des endroits où
[46:20] la Ville a fait même... au tout
[46:22] début, avant 1950, avait hésité
[46:24] à laisser des constructions fait
[46:27] surtout au sud de la 20, dans le
[46:31] coin de lac Viau et dans le coin
[46:33] de Jasper et dans ce coin-là.
[46:35] Ils y avaient Desmarais Cash.
[46:37] - Ça fait longtemps que je suis
[46:38] à la, ville mais je me rappelle
[46:39] pas des six années-là.
[46:42] - Finalement, les développeurs
[46:44] ont réussi à convaincre la Ville
[46:46] de le faire et il y a quelques
[46:47] autres endroits aussi à
[46:49] Beaconsfield que ça s'est fait.
[46:50] - Vous avez raison et ça fait
[46:52] partie du défi que les villes
[46:53] rencontraient présentement.
[46:55] Partiellement Québec in flotte,
[46:56] mais les changements
[46:57] climatiques, ça n'a pas de
[46:58] frontières. On peut le voir avec
[46:59] le gouvernement qui parle de
[47:02] restrictions dans les zones
[47:03] inondables, qui parle de changer
[47:05] les règles dans les zones
[47:08] inondables. On est pratiquement
[47:09] pas affecté à Beaconsfield. Mais
[47:10] les gens qui sont sur la
[47:12] Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, la
[47:13] Rivières-des-Prairies, le lac
[47:14] des Deux-Montagnes vivent des
[47:15] situations présentement avec les
[47:16] nouvelles normes, des nouvelles
[47:18] lois que le gouvernement met en
[47:19] place par rapport à les secteurs
[47:21] de zones inondables. Ce n'est
[47:23] pas nouveau.
[47:26] (inaudible)
[47:27] Il a voulu se rapprocher de
[47:28] l'eau, les voies ferrées, ça
[47:29] arrivait pas là, on prend des
[47:32] matières, on mettait ça sur les
[47:33] trains. Les gens habitaient
[47:34] proche, parfois collées sur l'.
[47:36] Ou de l'autre côté de la voie
[47:38] ferrée, les choses ont changé.
[47:40] Les activités anthropologique
[47:41] ont fait qu'on se retrouve dans
[47:42] des situations aujourd'hui où on
[47:43] se dit: comment on a fait ça?
[47:45] Comme on a permis ça? On est où
[47:46] on est et on y a des gens qui
[47:48] vivent là. Il y a des gens qui
[47:51] ont... comment je dirais? Ça
[47:52] leur histoire fait partie de la
[47:54] ville depuis des
[47:56] (inaudible)
[47:57] Devils. Il faut composer avec ça
[47:58] présentement. Si les défis de
[48:01] l'urbanisation. On est confronté
[48:02] à ces problématiques-là. S'il y
[48:04] avait des anciens ruisseaux et
[48:05] des anciennes rivières et qu'on
[48:06] a mis les mains sur dessus, il
[48:07] faut qu'on soit capable de
[48:08] composer avec ça. Je ne pense
[48:09] pas qu'on va capables de changer
[48:10] le passé. On va essayer
[48:12] d'améliorer le futur.
[48:14] -
[48:15] - Ce n'est quand même pas si
[48:16] vieux que ça comme édifice.
[48:17] J'étais surpris qui permet...
[48:19] mais semble qu'il y avait des
[48:20] lois qu'il y a une certaine
[48:21] distance qui doit être respectée
[48:24] avant de faire une construction
[48:25] par rapport à un cours d'eau.
[48:28] - Il n'y a pas de cours d'eau.
[48:30] Ils sont souterrains, où ils
[48:31] sont tous canalisés. Les cours
[48:33] d', autres ils y allaient
[48:35] ruisseau mais d'un bloc, la
[48:37] Russie sauce Saint-James, les
[48:38] roulés sur l'Anse-à-l'Orme. Il
[48:39] n'y a pas une tonne de ruisseaux
[48:41] qui sont répertoriés à
[48:42] Beaconsfield. Ce sont des
[48:43] anciens réussit. Il n'y avait
[48:46] pas de loi avant qui touche les
[48:48] réussir. La Loi sur
[48:50] l'environnement, ça ne fait
[48:51] pas... comme on la connaît
[48:52] aujourd'hui, ça ne va pas 50 ans
[48:53] que les comme ça.
[48:54] - Ce sera considéré.
[48:55] - La Loi sur l'environnement
[48:56] n'avait pas dedans. Ça ne fait
[48:58] pas longtemps et célébrer qui
[48:59] sont responsables de faire
[49:00] respecter la Loi sur la qualité
[49:02] d'environnement, le long du lac.
[49:05] On a aucune responsabilité.
[49:07] - Est-ce que vous avez une
[49:09] question?
[49:10] - Vous pouvez essayer de voir
[49:12] pour aider à trouver une
[49:14] solution, peut-être aller voir
[49:15] les anciens Russo si vous les
[49:18] trouvez. Je voulais savoir à
[49:19] propos de Thompson, la Ville
[49:24] ne... prend possession du chemin
[49:26] Thompson? Est-ce que la rue
[49:28] Thompson appartient déjà à la
[49:29] ville aussi ça va être un autre
[49:31] dossier?
[49:33] - C'est un dossier que ça fait
[49:34] trois étés qu'on travaille
[49:36] dessus et on va finalement
[49:37] réussir à faire une entente avec
[49:38] les propriétaires du secteur. En
[49:41] fait, l'étude des propriétés de
[49:42] la rue et du centre du terrain
[49:44] de tennis, l'espace, vers le
[49:46] savaient pas à qui ça
[49:47] appartenait. On a travaillé
[49:48] là-dessus depuis deux années. À
[49:50] faire des recherches, des
[49:54] recherches centenaires ou
[49:56] presque, jusqu'au début du
[49:57] dernier siècle, 1910.
[50:00] - 18 180. 11
[50:01] - On a reculé loin en arrière
[50:04] pour faire la recherche des
[50:05] titres et avec toutes sortes de
[50:09] changements légaux, avec tous
[50:11] les actes des propriétés qui ont
[50:12] changé il y a de l'information
[50:13] qui s'est perdu, les lois ont
[50:15] changé et on a voulu mettre ça à
[50:17] jour avec les gens du secteur
[50:19] qui souhaitait utiliser aménager
[50:22] l'espace vers, mais comme je
[50:24] leur appartenait pas et ce
[50:25] n'était pas clair si sa
[50:26] partenaire ou à nous, il avait
[50:28] rien de clair là-dedans. On
[50:29] s'est entendu, on a fait une
[50:30] entente avec laquelle on va
[50:31] aller devant un juge pour dire:
[50:34] écoutez, ça fait plus que
[50:35] s'entend que ce problème-là
[50:36] dure. Est-ce qu'on est capable
[50:39] de venir devant vous, Monsieur
[50:41] le juge, Madame la Juge, pour
[50:43] faire en sorte que ce bout de
[50:47] terrain-là où la rue appartient
[50:48] à la Ville... l'autre bout de
[50:52] terrain appartient aux
[50:53] riverains, Larry. C'est un peu
[50:54] ça l'entente finalement. On est
[50:55] bien content. Comme j'ai dit un
[50:58] peu à la blague, aux élus: je
[51:01] suis content, je pense que j'ai
[51:02] finalement résolu le problème
[51:03] parce qu'il y avait une
[51:04] résolution de 1959 qui mandate
[51:06] le DG de régler le problème. Ce
[51:10] n'était pas dans ma famille,
[51:11] c'est parce que j'espère que
[51:12] j'ai réglé les problèmes. Je
[51:14] n'avais pas les mêmes moyens
[51:15] technologiques que lui et
[51:16] certainement pas la même équipe
[51:18] professionnelle qui m'a appuyé
[51:19] pour arriver à ces résiste-là.
[51:21] - L'espaces verts demeurent
[51:23] propriétés des riverains?
[51:24] - Oui.
[51:25] - Ils vont payer des taxes?
[51:26] - Exactement. C'est peut-être
[51:29] pour ça que les discussions
[51:30] étaient plus longues.
[51:31] - La rue qui s'appelle rue
[51:33] Thompson pointe, est-ce qu'elle
[51:34] appartient déjà la ville?
[51:37] - On l'a municipalité récemment.
[51:43] Dans le fond, on l'a toujours
[51:44] entretenu, mais on
[51:46] l'municipalité officiellement
[51:47] par les avis durant l'été.
[51:50] - O.K., Merci.
[51:58] - Bonjour, Jennifer Marsh, je
[52:01] demeure au trois huit sept fois
[52:03] Road. On va rester dans les
[52:05] mêmes eaux, sans faire de jeu de
[52:08] mots. C'est ça, je viens en fait
[52:10] pour ma résidence à moi, mais
[52:11] aussi pour notre secteur. La
[52:13] réflexion en général, c'est
[52:16] Wayne
[52:17] (---)
[52:18] dans les rues environnantes. On
[52:19] est impactés par les inondations
[52:21] du 9 août, mais au-delà de ça
[52:24] même des pluies et qui sont plus
[52:26] abondantes que d'habitude, il se
[52:28] forme une accumulation et un
[52:30] manque de dénivelé qui ne permet
[52:32] pas d'évacuer l'eau. Bref, ça
[52:34] c'est la mise en contexte. La
[52:36] question suit... on était très
[52:38] encouragé de voir que dans les
[52:40] pourtours du parc et Shannon,
[52:42] vous fait des trappes d'aqueduc.
[52:43] Il y a des choses qui sont en
[52:45] branle et on se demandait. Vous
[52:46] mentionnez tout à l'heure qu'il
[52:47] y avait des zones qui avaient
[52:48] été identifiés comme plus d'une
[52:50] Érable. J'étais curieux de
[52:52] savoir si la rue Fletcher, plus
[52:54] précisément, fait partie de ces
[52:56] zones vulnérables à qui ont été
[52:58] identifiés par la Ville de
[52:59] Beaconsfield.
[53:03] - Je ne dirais pas qu'on a
[53:04] identifié spécifiquement des
[53:05] zones encore. On est encore en
[53:08] train de collecter l'information
[53:10] et d'essayer d'avoir une idée
[53:12] claire sur une carte de la
[53:14] ville. C'est où les secteurs
[53:16] affectés? Quels sont les
[53:17] secteurs? On a une idée, mais on
[53:18] est en train de travailler
[53:20] là-dessus pour s'assurer qu'on a
[53:21] tous les bonnes informations,
[53:23] justement pour travail des
[53:24] consultants pour nous aider à
[53:26] apporter les solutions
[53:28] appropriées pour... qu'on
[53:29] souhaite cette situation-là ne
[53:30] se répètent plus chez nous
[53:32] résidents. Il y a des
[53:35] particularités qui sont un peu
[53:36] difficile à évaluer et à
[53:37] mesurer. Je ne sais pas, vous
[53:38] semblez dire que vous avez déjà
[53:39] eu des problèmes dans le passé
[53:42] avec... sur Fletcher. Quand les
[53:44] pompiers demande à Hydro-Québec
[53:45] de fermer l'électricité, ça
[53:47] n'aide pas les résidences avec
[53:49] les pans submerge cibles. Ça
[53:51] c'est quelque chose que j'essaie
[53:52] de comprendre, l'étendue de
[53:55] cette fermeture-là, je suis en
[53:57] communication avec Hydro-Québec
[54:00] et j'essaie d'avoir
[54:01] l'information de leur part.
[54:02] Évidemment, les pompiers, leur
[54:04] priorité c'est de sauver des
[54:05] vies. Ce que j'ai compris
[54:08] sommairement c'est que sur
[54:09] Amelia avait des garages qui
[54:10] avaient été inondées comme il a
[54:12] été rapporté, les pompiers
[54:13] devaient rentrer dans le garage
[54:14] et pour faire ça, il fallait que
[54:16] l'électricité soit fermé, donc
[54:18] jusqu'à où ça a causé la
[54:19] fermeture, d'une part? Et
[54:21] d'autre part, ce que les service
[54:23] d'incendie a dit c'est qu'ils
[54:24] ont constaté qu'il y avait des
[54:26] transformateurs qui explosait
[54:27] cette soirée-là. Tout ça
[54:29] ensemble ça a fait un plus grand
[54:30] secteur, dont le secteur
[54:31] Sherwood, si je peux l'appeler
[54:32] comme ça. Donc ça évidemment ça
[54:34] n'a pas aidé. Quelles sont les
[54:37] mesures de
[54:38] (inaudible)
[54:39] qui peuvent être mis en place
[54:40] par les citoyens? Ce n'est pas
[54:42] simple s'il n'y a pas
[54:43] d'électricité, tu as beau avoir
[54:44] une pompe submersible ou deux ou
[54:46] quatre qui marchent électricité.
[54:47] Ça n'aidera. Pas
[54:48] - Content de savoir qu'ils
[54:49] avaient identifié ça comme un
[54:50] secteur névralgique, le secteur
[54:52] de Sherwood. Je voulais aussi
[54:54] savoir avec qui est-ce qu'on
[54:55] peut s'adresser pour justement
[54:57] peut-être avoir le suivi des
[54:59] choses et les niveaux de
[55:00] priorité et peut-être la
[55:01] planification qui va avoir lieu
[55:02] dans notre secteur?
[55:04] - Selon le plan d'action qu'on a
[55:06] soumis, on va faire des analyses
[55:07] durant cet automne. On espère
[55:09] être capable d'avoir une idée
[55:11] des travaux qui pourraient être
[55:12] mis de l'avant durant l'hiver.
[55:15] Je ne me rappelle plus Parker,
[55:16] mais je pense qu'au début de
[55:20] l'année prochaine ou dans les
[55:21] six premier de la nuit
[55:22] prochaine, on va avoir une idée
[55:23] des travaux qu'on va être
[55:24] capable de mettre de l'avant
[55:25] selon certaines priorités.
[55:27] Particulièrement, ça ne me donne
[55:29] rien sur le plan technique de
[55:30] tout réparer le côté nord, si ça
[55:33] bloque au côté sud, ça va
[55:34] bloquer pareil. Il faut regarder
[55:36] vers où on va regarder en
[55:37] premier. Il y a toute une
[55:39] stratégie d'entretien et puis,
[55:41] des réflexions des
[55:43] infrastructures, ou des
[55:44] plantations d'infrastructures
[55:46] qui doivent être effet en tenant
[55:47] compte de l'hydraulicité des
[55:50] réseaux et du comportement des
[55:52] puits évidemment. Une des choses
[55:55] qu'on a commencé l'année
[55:57] dernière, le mandat a été donné
[55:59] en a ou l'année dernière et on
[56:00] va voir les rapports cet
[56:01] automne, comme j'ai mentionné
[56:02] tout à l'heure. On va faire
[56:03] rajouter les informations des
[56:06] pluies, mais c'est d'utiliser
[56:08] nos fossés comme des bassins de
[56:11] rétention et présentement, on
[56:12] pense qu'il y a trop de fossé
[56:13] qui sont fermés et qui devrait
[56:16] être réouvert. On pensait déjà
[56:18] salin des dernières. C'était
[56:20] différentes situations qui
[56:21] étaient beaucoup moins
[56:22] problématiques, beaucoup moins
[56:25] répandu ou étendue chef-d'oeuvre
[56:26] et dire. On pense que ça c'en
[56:28] est un des moyens. On va étudier
[56:30] ce qu'ils appellent les jardins
[56:31] d', ou les parcs éponge
[56:32] eux-mêmes et planter des bassins
[56:33] de rétention, ajouter des
[56:36] sections de drainage. Ça va
[56:37] faire partie des réflexions. Ce
[56:39] ne sera pas court, mais on va
[56:41] revenir au conseil avec des
[56:42] plans d'action mise à jour et
[56:45] avec des nouveautés, des
[56:47] informations qui vont venir. Il
[56:48] va y avoir des mandats, des
[56:49] contrats qui vont subvenir au
[56:50] fur et à mesure. De quelle façon
[56:52] vous serez informés? Je vous
[56:55] invite d'inscrites à nos moyens
[56:56] de communication, Beaconsfield
[56:59] vous informais il y en a
[57:00] d'autres aussi, Facebook et
[57:01] tout. J'espère que vous êtes
[57:02] là-dessus. Au début de l'année
[57:04] prochaine, je dirais que si vous
[57:07] les contacter, info à béquilles,
[57:09] Field
[57:10] (inaudible)
[57:11] si vous voulez que ce soit le
[57:12] directeur général, les
[57:13] directeurs publics ça va faire
[57:14] plaisir de vous écouter. On est
[57:15] capable de vous informer.
[57:16] Parfois on n'est pas en mesure
[57:17] de vous informer parce qu'on n'a
[57:18] pas nécessairement l'information
[57:19] même si vous nous écrivez 12
[57:20] fois dans les 12 dernières
[57:21] semaines, ça nous donne pas plus
[57:23] d'informations. Malheureusement,
[57:24] ça prend quand même du temps
[57:25] faire ces analyses-là.
[57:26] - Merci, bien apprécié.
[57:28] - Bienvenue!
[57:40] >> Hi, I noticed the last three
[57:42] deputies were from Elmo Street,
[57:43] all complaining about the same
[57:44] thing, about the flooding.
[57:49] Well, I would ask why doesn't
[57:53] the City of Beaconsfield request
[57:56] from the STM that there be a bus
[57:59] that goes along Elm Street?
[58:01] There is no bus that connects
[58:05] the 411 to, I forget which bus,
[58:08] but the bus that is up on
[58:10] Sherbrooke. There is no bus, you
[58:12] have to walk that will. Ways of,
[58:13] course everybody has to drive,
[58:14] because there's no bus. And if a
[58:17] person can't drive, they have to
[58:19] walk. It's just elm street has
[58:23] been completely forgotten, that
[58:24] whole area. It's literally the
[58:26] wrong side of the tracks. I used
[58:29] to live off Elgin, and it is an
[58:32] impoverished area. Not everybody
[58:35] is like that rich developer who
[58:36] was here earlier who just left.
[58:41] So the thing is, I don't have a
[58:44] lot of money. I now live in the
[58:48] Beaurepaire area, but you know,
[58:51] I'm lucky to have somewhere
[58:52] that's affordable. But the point
[58:56] is please invest more in elm
[58:59] street, and please ask that
[59:00] there be a bus that goes along
[59:02] elm. It would not be too hard to
[59:03] ask, it would solve a lot of
[59:05] problems, it would reduce the
[59:08] poverty, it would help with
[59:09] climate change. It just makes
[59:11] sense. It makes so much sense. I
[59:13] don't know why nobody's ever
[59:15] thought of it.
[59:16] >> Madame corridor, we will take
[59:18] it up with STM. And we don't run
[59:22] STM, but we can take it up with
[59:23] them.
[59:24] >> Thank you. The other thing
[59:26] is, if you're actually concerned
[59:28] about climate change, why at
[59:30] every single event or they're
[59:32] not vegan options. Animal
[59:36] agriculture is one of the
[59:37] biggest contributors to climate
[59:39] change after fossil fuels. Why
[59:42] is every single food truck all
[59:45] meat and dairy options? Why is
[59:47] there not vegan often, or better
[59:48] yet, make the entire thing
[59:50] vegan, why not? This is a pita
[59:56] certified compassionate city,
[59:58] why are there no offence that
[59:59] any the Beaconsfield events.
[1:00:01] >> I will take a question as a
[1:00:02] suggestion, and I will refer it
[1:00:04] to our team that does organize
[1:00:05] all of our activities, outdoor
[1:00:07] activities.
[1:00:08] >> Thank you. The other thing
[1:00:09] that I'm going to keep bringing
[1:00:11] up is the lack of animal
[1:00:13] services in Beaconsfield. There
[1:00:15] is a chicken, a lost chicken,
[1:00:17] running along Montrose Park
[1:00:20] area.
[1:00:21] >> I -- you had written a
[1:00:23] question on that period.
[1:00:25] >> Yes.
[1:00:26] >> I have said before that we
[1:00:29] would submit it to the
[1:00:31] administration, and they will
[1:00:32] get back to you.
[1:00:33] >> Yes. By the way, the refuge
[1:00:36] -- has a space for the chickens.
[1:00:38] So if you're municipal patrol,
[1:00:40] people to pick the checkup,
[1:00:42] please bring the chicken to --
[1:00:44] >> We will ask the
[1:00:45] administration to take it up.
[1:00:46] Thank you.
[1:00:47] >> The sanctuary, they have
[1:00:51] space.
[1:00:52] >> Thank you.
[1:00:53] >> You're welcome.
[1:00:57] >> Hello, I'm Raymond Massey, I
[1:00:59] live at 373 Callum Street, unit
[1:01:03] number three. I just want you
[1:01:06] guys to realize, all of you, how
[1:01:08] hard this has been for all of
[1:01:11] us. This is tremendously,
[1:01:12] probably the most traumatic
[1:01:13] thing I've ever gone through in
[1:01:14] my life, I've been a homeowner
[1:01:16] all my life, I live in
[1:01:18] Beaconsfield now for ten years.
[1:01:21] I have a funny question, though
[1:01:22] I do want to know why the first
[1:01:24] five years that was there was
[1:01:25] never a flood, not even close to
[1:01:26] a flood, and now the last five
[1:01:29] years that I've been here, I've
[1:01:31] gone through, this is my third
[1:01:34] flood.
[1:01:35] [Inaudible]
[1:01:36] >> Yeah, but we can't blame
[1:01:37] everything on climate change, I
[1:01:38] think there's something going on
[1:01:39] in reference to -- first of, all
[1:01:40] I've been in contact with CN for
[1:01:42] the COVID bridge that goes
[1:01:44] underneath the railroad tracks.
[1:01:46] That has got to be checked and
[1:01:47] it's got to be cleared. And I
[1:01:49] asked the City guys to look at
[1:01:51] it.
[1:01:52] >> It was all clean in June, May
[1:01:54] or June.
[1:01:55] >> When you had the Sanivac
[1:01:56] people there, and then they
[1:01:58] said, you can't touch CN because
[1:02:01] that's then. I contacted CN,
[1:02:04] they said or side is clean, but
[1:02:06] we don't know about CP's side,
[1:02:09] which is crazy, cause it's in
[1:02:10] the same tunnel. But it's just
[1:02:13] ridiculous, the amount of stuff
[1:02:14] we've gone through, and she's
[1:02:15] right, the amount of personal
[1:02:17] money we are wasting right now.
[1:02:18] I, mean we can potentially lose
[1:02:21] hundreds of thousands of
[1:02:23] dollars, every person here,
[1:02:25] because of the facts our
[1:02:28] valuation goes down or something
[1:02:30] else. We can't sell our houses,
[1:02:32] or were on insurable. What is
[1:02:34] going to happen if we become an
[1:02:36] insurable? That is a major
[1:02:38] problem we have to live with.
[1:02:41] And I think -- I don't want to
[1:02:42] say, I mean, I don't even know
[1:02:43] what to talk about with this
[1:02:45] anymore, because we've been
[1:02:46] here, this is my third time I'm
[1:02:47] here. And every time I've come
[1:02:49] here, it's because of flooding.
[1:02:51] I, mean everybody has pretty
[1:02:52] much touched it today, but I
[1:02:55] don't know where to go, guys,
[1:02:56] because we are stuck, we are
[1:02:58] literally stuck. What a tax
[1:03:00] break? Maybe all of us residents
[1:03:02] could get a tax break for one
[1:03:04] year? As a token, -- believe,
[1:03:06] meat that is not going to cover
[1:03:08] half the costs are even close to
[1:03:09] the costs that it's costing us.
[1:03:11] And she's, right in the tens of
[1:03:12] thousands of dollars. I, mean
[1:03:14] are deductible on our interest
[1:03:16] right now, we've tripled our
[1:03:18] insurance in the last five
[1:03:19] years, because nobody wants to
[1:03:21] really ensure us. Who's going to
[1:03:23] help us pay for that? Nobody.
[1:03:28] You guys aren't -- I don't feel
[1:03:30] very welcome right now in
[1:03:31] Beaconsfield. I don't feel like
[1:03:33] the city of Beaconsfield, excuse
[1:03:35] my language, doesn't give.
[1:03:38] Nobody is doing nothing. You
[1:03:40] know, since the flood, I have
[1:03:42] not seen one person from
[1:03:43] Beaconsfield come by and say how
[1:03:44] are you guys doing. But before
[1:03:47] the flood, there was that guy
[1:03:49] whipping around with his
[1:03:51] electric car, oh man, he was
[1:03:52] going back to see us almost
[1:03:53] every three days, telling us
[1:03:55] that these new pipes that they
[1:03:56] put in, which I think was a
[1:03:57] waste of money, by the way,
[1:03:59] because all you've done now is
[1:04:01] he brought more water quicker to
[1:04:03] our area. That's it. And I even
[1:04:05] told you, but by the way, your
[1:04:07] contractor, when he was there,
[1:04:09] and that July rain, it came
[1:04:11] back, it backed up, I had to put
[1:04:13] two pumps in my to ditch is to
[1:04:16] get -- and I gave him the --
[1:04:20] who's a number two on that. And
[1:04:23] the contract said you will never
[1:04:24] get flooded again. I said no,
[1:04:26] you're wrong. And you know what
[1:04:27] he told me? He said it's the
[1:04:29] distribution. It's not us. We
[1:04:31] are going to put in new types,
[1:04:32] but it's where it's going,
[1:04:34] underneath that covert bridge. I
[1:04:36] think there is something blocked
[1:04:38] at the and and I don't know, I
[1:04:40] can ask, you probably can't tell
[1:04:42] me, but that's the problem, I
[1:04:44] think. And I've been watching
[1:04:45] that culvert bridge for five
[1:04:47] years now since the first time
[1:04:48] it got flooded, and every time
[1:04:50] it goes up and raises, almost
[1:04:53] when it touches close to that
[1:04:55] bicycle path bridge that's right
[1:04:57] there we are in trouble, and
[1:04:59] then it backs up into our
[1:05:00] ditches, and that's where it
[1:05:01] backs up onto the street. I do
[1:05:04] understand that the August 9th
[1:05:07] was bizarre, that was, like
[1:05:09] okay, we all get that, but I
[1:05:11] mean, you know, we are living
[1:05:12] this. I still don't even have
[1:05:14] electricity yet. I don't even
[1:05:16] have a water and drier, I've
[1:05:17] been going to my kids house to
[1:05:19] be watching. I mean, guys, we're
[1:05:22] really stuck. We are -- excuse
[1:05:24] my language --
[1:05:27] >> It is a terrible situation, I
[1:05:29] agree.
[1:05:30] >> It is.
[1:05:31] >> We will look at the culvert.
[1:05:32] >> I mean, Dominic knows who I
[1:05:34] am, I've emailed to him many
[1:05:35] times, he knows all my story.
[1:05:37] And I even told her that in a
[1:05:38] letter, and I told her, that --
[1:05:40] the biggest problem you have is
[1:05:42] the distribution of water. Once
[1:05:44] it gets there, it has to go. And
[1:05:46] the little lady mentioned it
[1:05:48] before, her. She's right.
[1:05:51] Because you know what? Before, I
[1:05:53] remember what it was in that
[1:05:54] area, there was Rivers and there
[1:05:56] was little ravines. And yet,
[1:05:58] don't tell me, it's not that
[1:05:59] long ago they built there, it's
[1:06:00] only 15 years our place, the
[1:06:02] last one. So it's not that long.
[1:06:06] You should have a note of where
[1:06:07] that's built on. You know what I
[1:06:08] think they should've done? They
[1:06:10] should've raised all the
[1:06:11] buildings about the land level
[1:06:13] flat, and then we wouldn't have
[1:06:14] had this problem. But they
[1:06:15] should've told -- c, the
[1:06:17] contractors, they didn't do much
[1:06:20] there. Anyways, that's my
[1:06:21] question.
[1:06:22] >> Thank you very much. Thank
[1:06:25] you.
[1:06:33] [Inaudible]
[1:06:34] In the tunnel. All the water
[1:06:35] down.
[1:06:36] >> Sir, please. Now we are going
[1:06:38] to continue with the meeting.
[1:06:39] >> Mister Mayor, may I just say
[1:06:41] a word?
[1:06:42] >> Sure.
[1:06:43] >> Thank, you Mr. Masse, for
[1:06:45] coming here tonight and talking
[1:06:46] to us. I think some of us have
[1:06:50] been there on our own to visit
[1:06:51] your place and see the history.
[1:06:53] It's interesting what you say
[1:06:54] about the culvert. Just the
[1:06:56] other day in the last few days,
[1:06:58] I guess it was last weekend at
[1:06:59] our caucus, anyway, when we met,
[1:07:02] Monday night, right, some of us
[1:07:06] were along with the DG, we were
[1:07:09] actually visiting Meadowbrook
[1:07:10] and looking at just that area,
[1:07:12] because the water from your
[1:07:13] covert flows underneath the
[1:07:15] train tracks and underneath the
[1:07:17] highway and it collects just
[1:07:18] along the Beaurepaire, and there
[1:07:21] is actually a canal area that
[1:07:26] goes under what we call
[1:07:27] Meadowbrook, and we see there is
[1:07:28] a great big huge caged in area
[1:07:32] trying to keep up with the
[1:07:34] debris. So we have looked at it.
[1:07:35] We're kind of aware that the
[1:07:37] bottleneck kind of thing, at
[1:07:38] least I'm just talking
[1:07:41] personally. But the thing is
[1:07:42] though we are lucky -- looking
[1:07:44] at that, and I'm interested in
[1:07:48] hearing what he said tonight,
[1:07:49] but there is a jam up. And
[1:07:51] obviously one serious, your
[1:07:54] homes are very vulnerable, we
[1:07:56] recognize that.
[1:07:57] >> Yeah, I'm just going to make
[1:07:58] another point, I noticed that a
[1:08:00] lot of houses, especially those
[1:08:02] on elm and some of the ones on
[1:08:04] Meadowbrook, they're built on
[1:08:06] top of Meadowbrook. So
[1:08:08] Meadowbrook has been put inside
[1:08:10] pipes and pushed under peoples,
[1:08:13] you know, foundations and that.
[1:08:17] Basically, you are clogging the
[1:08:19] earth arteries, and if you clog
[1:08:22] arteries Iran and up with a
[1:08:23] death cloth and end up with an
[1:08:24] embolism. You have given the
[1:08:25] earthen embolism. I would
[1:08:27] suggest instead of trying to
[1:08:28] block the earth arteries, like
[1:08:31] Meadowbrook, instead of blocking
[1:08:33] the rivers and streams, instead
[1:08:34] of continue to block them and
[1:08:36] force them here and there, just
[1:08:38] let them go over they want to,
[1:08:39] go and try to work with nature
[1:08:41] rather than against nature, to
[1:08:44] try to use natural ways to
[1:08:47] control the water.
[1:08:50] >> Thank you very much for your
[1:08:54] suggestion. Yes, this is the
[1:08:55] last one.
[1:08:57] >> What about -- I've heard
[1:08:59] stories about sponge parks,
[1:09:02] sponge parks to absorb water.
[1:09:04] >> Yes.
[1:09:05] >> And I heard that the City of
[1:09:06] Montréal is looking into --
[1:09:08] that.
[1:09:09] >> Yeah, yeah. I don't know if
[1:09:10] you guys have talked about that
[1:09:12] or --
[1:09:13] >> We -- if you read the action
[1:09:14] plan.
[1:09:15] >> Okay.
[1:09:17] >> Those are all the things that
[1:09:18] I'm sure the administration will
[1:09:21] look at and see what can be
[1:09:24] done. Obviously, we realized
[1:09:26] that we need to improve, and we
[1:09:30] know that we are going to face
[1:09:33] similar storms in the future, so
[1:09:37] we need to improve our
[1:09:41] infrastructure. That's why we
[1:09:43] produce on action plan to do
[1:09:47] this, and the action plan right
[1:09:49] now is, you know, kind of vague,
[1:09:52] a little bit, because we haven't
[1:09:54] done all the work to get it
[1:09:58] done. But anytime anybody has a
[1:10:02] question, info at Beaconsfield,
[1:10:05] and it will be answered.
[1:10:10] >> Okay.
[1:10:11] >> So now we are going to
[1:10:12] continue with the agenda. Yeah?
[1:10:15] Madame la greffière. >> Adoption
[1:10:18] of the minutes of the city of
[1:10:21] Beaconsfield regular Council
[1:10:22] meeting of August 26, 2024.
[1:10:23] >>.
[1:10:24] >>.
[1:10:25] >>
[1:10:26] >> Proposed.
[1:10:27] >> Seconded.
[1:10:28] >> In favour.
[1:10:29] Renouvellement du contrat
[1:10:34] technique TP 2020-10 pour la
[1:10:35] fourniture et le transport de 2
[1:10:36] 200 tonnes de pierre concassée
[1:10:37] pour l'année 2025 avec Carrière
[1:10:38] Dolomite
[1:10:39] (1996)
[1:10:40] inc. Au coût approximatif de 48
[1:10:41] 000 $, toutes taxes incluses
[1:10:45] .
[1:10:46] - Proposé.
[1:10:47] - J'appuie. >> In favour. À
[1:10:53] l'unanimité. Renewal of contract
[1:10:56] TP 2020-11 for the collection
[1:10:58] and transportation of waste,
[1:10:59] organic matter and bulky waste
[1:11:02] for the year 2025 with Services
[1:11:03] Ricova Inc., at an approximate
[1:11:06] cost of $1,100 000, all taxes
[1:11:07] included.
[1:11:11] >> Could you please stop,
[1:11:13] because -- let the people leave
[1:11:14] that don't want to be here for
[1:11:16] the rest of the meeting. So go
[1:11:18] ahead and leave please now.
[1:11:27] Thank you for coming.
[1:11:33] >> All taxes included,
[1:11:37] $1,100,000.
[1:11:38] >> Second.
[1:11:39] >> In favour. À l'unanimité.
[1:11:44] Renouvellement du contrat TP
[1:11:45] 2021-11 pour la fourniture de
[1:11:46] services professionnels pour le
[1:11:47] programme préventif quinquennal
[1:11:48] du réseau d'aqueduc pour l'année
[1:11:49] 2025 avec Management Simo inc.
[1:11:51] Au coût approximatif de 131 000
[1:11:52] $, toutes taxes incluses.
[1:11:59] - Proposé.
[1:12:01] - Secondé.
[1:12:02] - En faveur.
[1:12:04] - À l'unanimité.
[1:12:06] Renewal of contract TP 2023-01
[1:12:08] for the supply and transport of
[1:12:09] metal containers for dry
[1:12:10] materials for the year 2025 with
[1:12:12] 9386-0120 Québec Inc.
[1:12:16] (E360S)
[1:12:19] , at an approximate cost of
[1:12:21] $51,000, all taxes included.
[1:12:25] >> I propose.
[1:12:28] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.
[1:12:33] Octroi de gré à gré d'un contrat
[1:12:34] pour les travaux d'entretien de
[1:12:35] la piscine Beaurepaire à
[1:12:36] Piscines et Spas Poseidon pour
[1:12:37] la somme de 35 636,50 $ toutes
[1:12:38] taxes incluses
[1:12:39] (RGC 2024-15)
[1:12:45] .
[1:12:49] - Je seconde. >> In favour.
[1:12:53] >> Would I please ask the
[1:12:55] councillors that do approve and
[1:12:58] second to please use the mic so
[1:13:00] that we can register your
[1:13:02] approval and your seconding?
[1:13:05] Thank you.
[1:13:08] >> Awarding of a mandate by
[1:13:09] mutual agreement for the removal
[1:13:10] of bulky items and objects
[1:13:11] soiled by torrential rains on
[1:13:12] August 9, 2024, to Paysagiste et
[1:13:15] Déneigement NJ, for the
[1:13:18] approximative amount of
[1:13:20] $130,000, all taxes included
[1:13:21] (RGC 2024-16)
[1:13:24] .
[1:13:27] >> Proposed.
[1:13:28] >> Second.
[1:13:29] >> All in favour.
[1:13:33] Aller dans le métier. Octroi
[1:13:35] d'un mandat de gré à gré
[1:13:36] concernant des travaux de
[1:13:37] correction de drainage à
[1:13:38] 9129-2201 Québec inc.
[1:13:39] (Travaux Routiers Metropole)
[1:13:40] Pour un montant approximatif de
[1:13:41] 130 000 $, toutes taxes incluses
[1:13:42] (RGC 2024-17)
[1:13:43] .
[1:13:49] - Je propose.
[1:13:51] - Je seconde. Secondé.
[1:13:56] >> All in favour? - À
[1:13:58] l'unanimité. Authorization to
[1:14:01] participate in the group
[1:14:02] purchasing program of the City
[1:14:03] of Montréal for the purchase of
[1:14:04] de-icing salt for the next four
[1:14:05] (4)
[1:14:06] winter seasons, from 2024-2025
[1:14:07] to 2027-2028.
[1:14:13] >> I propose.
[1:14:14] >> I second.
[1:14:16] >> All in favour? À l'unanimité.
[1:14:21] Approbation de la liste des
[1:14:22] comptes à payer au 23 septembre
[1:14:23] 2024, et de la liste des
[1:14:24] paiements préautorisés pour la
[1:14:25] période du 15 août 2024 au 25
[1:14:26] août 2024 et du 27 août 2024 au
[1:14:27] 11 septembre 2024, pour un
[1:14:28] déboursé total de 3 808 139,16
[1:14:30] $.
[1:14:40] - Les montants importants sont
[1:14:45] 475840, cinq approches RCA pour
[1:14:48] des comptes progressive de
[1:14:49] numéro 2 concernant les travaux
[1:14:51] des réhabilitation de la jeter.
[1:14:54] Cat 130187, 15, pour
[1:14:59] (---)
[1:15:00] Chevalier morale architecte.
[1:15:02] Honoraires pour la présence,
[1:15:04] présentation concernant le
[1:15:06] concours d'architecture
[1:15:10] pluridisciplinaire pour le
[1:15:11] centre culturel. 297558 et 34,
[1:15:17] économise contre Hudson pour le
[1:15:19] décompte... progressive numéro 4
[1:15:21] concernant la construction d'un
[1:15:22] nouveau chalet. 177257 et 15,
[1:15:27] construction Arcade. Pour des
[1:15:29] comptes progressifs numéro 1
[1:15:30] concernant la rénovation de la
[1:15:35] patinoire. 587587, 0 sept.
[1:15:43] - Je propose.
[1:15:44] - J'appuie.
[1:15:45] - En faveur. >> Approval of a
[1:15:51] $150 contribution to Bluefins
[1:15:53] Swim Club for the purchase of an
[1:15:55] advertisement in their regional
[1:15:56] Swim Meet programme for the year
[1:15:58] 2024.
[1:16:01] >>.
[1:16:02] >> Proposed.
[1:16:03] >> Seconded.
[1:16:04] >> In favour? À l'unanimité.
[1:16:12] Approbation d'un appui financier
[1:16:13] de 500 $ à Action jeunesse de
[1:16:14] l'Ouest-de-l'Île
[1:16:15] (AJOI)
[1:16:16] pour l'année 2024.
[1:16:17] - Je propose.
[1:16:18] - J'appuie.
[1:16:19] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.
[1:16:22] Approval of a $500 contribution
[1:16:24] to Arthritis West Island Self
[1:16:25] Help Association
[1:16:26] (AWISH)
[1:16:27] for the year 2024.
[1:16:30] >>.
[1:16:32] >> Second.
[1:16:33] >> In favour?
[1:16:35] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un
[1:16:37] appui financier de 500 $ au
[1:16:38] Refuge pour les femmes de
[1:16:39] l'Ouest de l'Île
[1:16:40] (RFOI)
[1:16:41] pour l'année 2024.
[1:16:42] >> Propose.
[1:16:43] >> Seconded. - En faveur.
[1:16:47] - À l'unanimité. Approval of a
[1:16:50] $1,000 contribution to West
[1:16:53] Island Volunteer Accompaniment
[1:16:54] Service
[1:16:55] (ABOVAS)
[1:16:56] for the year 2024.
[1:16:57] >> I propose.
[1:16:58] >> I second.
[1:16:59] >> In favour.
[1:17:02] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un
[1:17:04] appui financier de 1 000 $ au
[1:17:05] Centre de bien-être de
[1:17:06] l'Ouest-de-l'Île
[1:17:07] (WICWC)
[1:17:08] pour l'année 2024.
[1:17:12] - Je propose.
[1:17:13] - Je seconde.
[1:17:14] - En faveur.
[1:17:16] - À l'unanimité. >> Approval of
[1:17:20] a $1,500 contribution to West
[1:17:23] Island Citizen Advocacy
[1:17:24] (WICA)
[1:17:25] for the year 2024.
[1:17:26] >> I propose.
[1:17:28] >> I second.
[1:17:29] >> In favour?
[1:17:31] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un
[1:17:34] appui financier de 2 000 $ au
[1:17:35] Centre d'action bénévole
[1:17:36] Ouest-de-l'Île
[1:17:37] (VWI)
[1:17:38] pour l'année 2024.
[1:17:44] >> Second.
[1:17:45] >> In favour? - À l'unanimité.
[1:17:49] Approval of a $3,000
[1:17:50] contribution to Friends for
[1:17:51] Mental Health
[1:17:52] (FMH)
[1:17:53] for the year 2024.
[1:17:56] >> Proposed.
[1:17:59] >> Second.
[1:18:00] >> In favour? Allez limiter.
[1:18:07] Approbation d'un appui financier
[1:18:08] de 3 000 $ à Table de Quartier
[1:18:09] Sud de l'Ouest-de-l'Île
[1:18:10] (TQSOI)
[1:18:11] pour l'année 2024.
[1:18:13] -
[1:18:14] - Je propose.
[1:18:15] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.
[1:18:18] Approval of a $3,500
[1:18:20] contribution to Low Vision
[1:18:21] Self-Help Association
[1:18:22] (LVSHA)
[1:18:23] for the year 2024.
[1:18:28] >> Proposed.
[1:18:29] >> Seconded.
[1:18:30] >> In favour?
[1:18:32] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un
[1:18:34] appui financier de 15 000 $ pour
[1:18:35] les frais de location de glaces
[1:18:36] pour la saison 2024-2025 à
[1:18:37] l'Association de ringuette
[1:18:38] Beaconsfield Kirkland
[1:18:39] (BKRA)
[1:18:40] .
[1:18:43] >> Propose. - Je seconde.
[1:18:46] - En faveur.
[1:18:48] - À l'unanimité. Compensation of
[1:18:51] overtime hours worked by
[1:18:52] managers during emergency
[1:18:53] measures following the
[1:18:54] torrential rains of August 9 and
[1:18:55] 10, 2024.
[1:18:58] >> Proposed.
[1:18:59] >> Second.
[1:19:00] >> In favour? Aline admit et. À
[1:19:06] l'unanimité, pardon. Demande de
[1:19:07] dérogation mineure pour la
[1:19:08] propriété située au 215, Elm. La
[1:19:11] recommandation est approuvée.
[1:19:12] - Proposé.
[1:19:13] - Secondé.
[1:19:14] - En faveur.
[1:19:15] - À l'unanimité.
[1:19:24] Contre... pardon.
[1:19:28] - C'est unanime, contre. Pour
[1:19:30] être clair, je suis contre.
[1:19:32] - À l'unanimité, la dérogation
[1:19:34] est refusée. Request for the
[1:19:40] approval of the Site Planning
[1:19:41] and Architectural Integration
[1:19:42] Programme
[1:19:43] (SPAIP)
[1:19:44] relating to a building permit
[1:19:45] application for a new main
[1:19:46] building located at 10 Madsen.
[1:19:47] The recommendation is to refuse.
[1:19:48] >> Propose.
[1:19:49] >> Second.
[1:19:51] >> In favour of recommendation?
[1:19:55] À l'unanimité. Demande
[1:19:56] d'approbation du Plan
[1:19:57] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:19:58] architecturale
[1:19:59] (PIIA)
[1:20:00] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:20:01] de construction pour un nouveau
[1:20:02] bâtiment principal situé au 107,
[1:20:03] Woodland.
[1:20:06] La recommandation d'approuver.
[1:20:08] - Proposé.
[1:20:09] - J'appuie.
[1:20:10] - En faveur de la
[1:20:11] recommandation.
[1:20:13] - À l'unanimité.
[1:20:15] Request for the approval of the
[1:20:16] Site Planning and Architectural
[1:20:17] Integration Programme
[1:20:18] (SPAIP)
[1:20:19] relating to a building permit
[1:20:20] application for a new main
[1:20:21] building located at 372
[1:20:22] Chantilly. The recommendation is
[1:20:24] to refuse.
[1:20:25] >> Propose.
[1:20:26] >> Second. - En faveur de la
[1:20:30] recommandation?
[1:20:32] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[1:20:37] d'approbation du Plan
[1:20:38] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:20:39] architecturale
[1:20:40] (PIIA)
[1:20:41] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:20:42] de construction pour un nouveau
[1:20:43] bâtiment principal situé au 535,
[1:20:44] Cedar. La recommandation est de
[1:20:46] refuser.
[1:20:47] - Proposé.
[1:20:48] - Secondé.
[1:20:49] - En faveur de la
[1:20:51] recommandation?
[1:20:52] - À l'unanimité. Request for the
[1:20:54] approval of the Site Planning
[1:20:56] and Architectural Integration
[1:20:58] Programme
[1:20:59] (SPAIP)
[1:21:00] relating to a building permit
[1:21:01] application for the extension of
[1:21:02] the main building located at 233
[1:21:03] Cadillac. The recommendation is
[1:21:06] to refuse.
[1:21:07] >> Proposed.
[1:21:08] >> Second. En faveur de la
[1:21:11] recommandation.
[1:21:12] - À l'unanimité. Demande
[1:21:13] d'approbation du Plan
[1:21:14] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:21:15] a rchitecturale
[1:21:16] (PIIA)
[1:21:17] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:21:18] de construction pour la
[1:21:19] modification de la façade du
[1:21:20] bâtiment principal situéau 65,
[1:21:21] Devon. La recommandation est
[1:21:24] d'approuver.
[1:21:25] - Proposé.
[1:21:26] - Secondé.
[1:21:27] - En faveur de la
[1:21:28] recommandation?
[1:21:29] - À l'unanimité.
[1:21:32] Request for the approval of the
[1:21:33] Site Planning and Architectural
[1:21:34] Integration Programme
[1:21:35] (SPAIP)
[1:21:36] relating to a building permit
[1:21:37] application for the modification
[1:21:38] of the facade of the main
[1:21:39] building located at 113
[1:21:40] Brentwood. The recommendation is
[1:21:43] to refuse.
[1:21:44] >> Proposed.
[1:21:45] >> I second.
[1:21:46] >> In favour of the
[1:21:47] recommendation? - À l'unanimité.
[1:21:51] Demande d'approbation du Plan
[1:21:52] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:21:53] architecturale
[1:21:54] (PIIA)
[1:21:55] relatif à la demande d'un permis
[1:21:56] de construction pour la
[1:21:57] modification de la façade du
[1:21:58] bâtiment principal situé au 188,
[1:21:59] Chestnut. La recommandation est
[1:22:00] de refuser.
[1:22:02] - Proposé.
[1:22:05] - Secondé.
[1:22:06] - En faveur de la
[1:22:08] recommandation?
[1:22:09] - Allez unanimité. Request for
[1:22:13] the approval of the Site
[1:22:14] Planning and Architectural
[1:22:15] Integration Programme
[1:22:16] (SPAIP)
[1:22:17] relating to a building permit
[1:22:18] application for the modification
[1:22:19] of the facade of a main building
[1:22:20] located at 519 Westhill. The
[1:22:21] recommendation is to approve.
[1:22:23] >> Proposed.
[1:22:24] >> Second.
[1:22:25] >> All in favour? À limiter.
[1:22:31] Acceptation d'une somme de 64
[1:22:32] 999,00 $ à des fins de frais de
[1:22:33] parcs que le propriétaire du lot
[1:22:34] 1 417 475
[1:22:35] (107, Woodland)
[1:22:36] doit payer à la Ville,
[1:22:37] conformément au Règlement
[1:22:38] BEAC-128 concernant les
[1:22:39] contributions pour fins
[1:22:40] d'établissement, de maintien et
[1:22:41] d'amélioration de parcs,
[1:22:42] terrains de jeux et espaces
[1:22:43] naturels sur le territoire de la
[1:22:44] Ville de Beaconsfield.
[1:22:49] - Je propose.
[1:22:51] - J'appuie.
[1:22:52] - En faveur d'accepter ce
[1:22:55] montant?
[1:22:56] - À l'unanimité.
[1:22:58] Nomination in view of permanency
[1:22:59] for the position of
[1:23:00] Contremaître, mécanique et
[1:23:01] signalisation, retroactively to
[1:23:02] September 4, 2024.
[1:23:09] >> This is Frederick --
[1:23:13] Nomination in view of permanency
[1:23:14] as Opérateur Annexe A-1
[1:23:15] (I)
[1:23:16] to position 5235 at the Public
[1:23:17] Works Department.
[1:23:18] - Je propose.
[1:23:19] - Je seconde, mais
[1:23:20] (inaudible)
[1:23:21] .
[1:23:22] - En faveur.
[1:23:23] - À l'unanimité. Nomination en
[1:23:26] vue de permanence à titre de
[1:23:27] Surintendant, Travaux publics et
[1:23:28] environnement au poste 5207.
[1:23:32] - C'est à qui la chance?
[1:23:34] - Proposé.
[1:23:36] - Secondé.
[1:23:37] - En faveur.
[1:23:38] - À l'unanimité.
[1:23:49] >> This is Kurt Van rent wick.
[1:23:52] >> Propose.
[1:23:56] [Inaudible]
[1:23:59] I'm wondering what exactly does
[1:24:01] it mean that
[1:24:02] [Inaudible]
[1:24:03] >> I'm sorry, but you cannot
[1:24:05] interrupt the council meeting,
[1:24:07] so --
[1:24:08] >> I'm just wondering what's
[1:24:09] happening with --
[1:24:10] [Inaudible]
[1:24:12] Just four public --
[1:24:14] >> It's a blue collar working at
[1:24:16] public's work doing jobs on the
[1:24:18] road, and snow operations and
[1:24:21] branch pick up and asphalt and
[1:24:24] water and sewer. It has nothing
[1:24:26] to do with a dog shelter.
[1:24:29] >> And please, do not interrupt
[1:24:31] the council meeting, please.
[1:24:34] >> So, Kurt Van rhetoric. - Je
[1:24:38] seconde.
[1:24:39] - En faveur.
[1:24:41] - À l'unanimité. Nomination en
[1:24:43] vue de permanence à titre
[1:24:44] d'Opérateur Annexe A-1
[1:24:45] (II)
[1:24:46] au poste de 5239 au Service des
[1:24:47] travaux publics.
[1:24:53] Le nom c'est Amin assumait n'.
[1:24:57] - Je propose.
[1:24:59] - J'appuie.
[1:25:00] - En faveur.
[1:25:02] - À l'unanimité. Adoption of the
[1:25:06] policy RH-002 Harcèlement
[1:25:08] psychologique ou sexuel au
[1:25:09] travail et traitement des
[1:25:11] plaintes. Je propose.
[1:25:17] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.
[1:25:20] Procès-verbal de la réunion du
[1:25:21] Comité consultatif d'urbanisme
[1:25:22] du 4 septembre 2024.
[1:25:29] - Je propose.
[1:25:30] - Je seconde.
[1:25:31] - En faveur.
[1:25:33] - À l'unanimité.
[1:25:35] Deposit of the minutes of the
[1:25:36] Demolition Committee meeting of
[1:25:37] August 6, 2024. - Est-ce qu'il y
[1:25:43] a des commentaires, Monsieur le
[1:25:45] président du comité?
[1:25:46] - Oui, merci Monsieur le Maire.
[1:25:48] Alors, vous le 6 août dernier
[1:25:51] dans le cadre de cette réunion
[1:25:53] du comité de démolition qui
[1:25:54] portait sur les sept Avenue Kirk
[1:25:58] Woodcock, nous avons un journaux
[1:25:59] à nos travaux pour obtenir plus
[1:26:01] d'informations que nous avons
[1:26:02] depuis obtenu. Nous devrions
[1:26:05] reprendre cette séance dans les
[1:26:06] deux prochaines semaines.
[1:26:10] - Alors, c'est un dépôt.
[1:26:12] And she's very practical, open
[1:26:13] minded individual who -- you
[1:26:14] know, good environmental habits
[1:26:15] here in Beaconsfield. - Oui.
[1:26:16] Nomination d'un membre au Comité
[1:26:17] consultatif de l'environnement.
[1:26:25] - Je propose Yvan Bourque, comme
[1:26:28] membre du Comité de
[1:26:29] (inaudible)
[1:26:30] . Madame Bourque est une
[1:26:32] résidant de Beaconsfield depuis
[1:26:33] 30 ans. Elle est impliquée et
[1:26:36] bien informé sur les questions
[1:26:40] de l'environnement et...
[1:26:51] je propose madame Bourque.
[1:26:52] And she also, you know, likes to
[1:26:54] do a lot of research on this
[1:26:55] program, so we understand that.
[1:26:57] So I think she'll be good at --
[1:27:04] Ratification of a title
[1:27:05] regularization agreement between
[1:27:06] City of Beaconsfield and the
[1:27:07] Association Thompson Point for
[1:27:08] lot 1 418 653
[1:27:09] (Lakeshore Road, Thompson
[1:27:10] Point sector)
[1:27:11] .
[1:27:12] - Qui seconde?
[1:27:13] - Je seconde.
[1:27:14] - En faveur.
[1:27:15] - À l'unanimité.
[1:27:24] >> Proposed.
[1:27:26] >> And you must be very happy,
[1:27:28] Dominique, about this
[1:27:29] settlement.
[1:27:30] >> I'm happy for everyone.
[1:27:31] [Laughter]
[1:27:33] >> I seconded.
[1:27:34] >> All in favour?
[1:27:37] - À l'unanimité. Résolution
[1:27:39] concernant le plan d'actions
[1:27:40] préliminaire recommandé par
[1:27:41] l'administration suite aux
[1:27:42] pluies diluviennes et
[1:27:43] inondations du 9 et 10 août
[1:27:44] 2024.
[1:27:48] >> Propose. - J'appuie.
[1:27:50] - En faveur.
[1:27:53] - À l'unanimité. Development and
[1:27:57] implementation of the Plan
[1:27:58] municipal de gestion des actifs
[1:27:59] (PGA)
[1:28:00] for Water and Buildings to
[1:28:02] optimize the management of
[1:28:04] municipal assets of the City of
[1:28:05] Beaconsfield. Je propose.
[1:28:09] - J'appuie.
[1:28:10] - En faveur.
[1:28:12] - À l'unanimité. Demande de
[1:28:14] lettre d'appui aux Centres de la
[1:28:15] jeunesse et de la famille
[1:28:16] Batshaw pour le projet
[1:28:17] d'infrastructure du campus
[1:28:18] Beaconsfield sur le terrain du
[1:28:19] CIUSSS de
[1:28:20] l'Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal.
[1:28:23] (---)
[1:28:24] Je propose.
[1:28:26] - Je seconde.
[1:28:31] - En faveur.
[1:28:34] - À l'unanimité.
[1:28:39] Authorization to allow the
[1:28:41] Friends of Beaurepaire Village
[1:28:42] to host the Marché BEAU Holiday
[1:28:44] Market event in the Christmas
[1:28:45] Park tennis court parking area,
[1:28:47] to use the Park's chalet on
[1:28:48] Saturday, November 23, 2024,
[1:28:49] from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. and that
[1:28:54] costs for First Aid services be
[1:28:55] paid by the City.
[1:28:58] >> Proposed.
[1:28:59] >> Second.
[1:29:01] >> In favour?
[1:29:05] - À l'unanimité.
[1:29:11] Autorisation de signature de la
[1:29:12] Convention d'aide financière
[1:29:13] 2024-2025 auprès du ministère de
[1:29:14] l'Éducation, du Loisir et du
[1:29:16] Sport dans le cadre du Programme
[1:29:17] d'aide financière pour la
[1:29:18] gratuité de la formation des
[1:29:19] surveillants-sauveteurs et des
[1:29:20] moniteurs aquatiques.
[1:29:24] - Je propose.
[1:29:25] - Je seconde.
[1:29:26] - En faveur.
[1:29:27] - À l'unanimité. >> Mayor's
[1:29:32] report on the decisions made by
[1:29:34] the Agglomeration Council at its
[1:29:35] meeting of September 19, 2024.
[1:29:40] >> Well, there was a very smooth
[1:29:44] meeting, and none of the
[1:29:46] demerged municipalities objected
[1:29:47] to anything on the agenda, so
[1:29:50] everything was approved
[1:29:52] unanimously. And we did spend a
[1:29:53] lot of money.
[1:29:55] [Inaudible]
[1:29:56] >> No, I'm sorry, you cannot
[1:29:58] interrupt the meeting.
[1:30:00] [Inaudible]
[1:30:01] >> I'm, sorry you cannot
[1:30:02] interrupt the meeting. And I
[1:30:06] will ask that you be removed if
[1:30:09] you continue.
[1:30:14] Dépôt des rapports des
[1:30:15] directeurs.
[1:30:18] - Rien de particulier à
[1:30:20] signalerai, Monsieur le Maire.
[1:30:22] Surtout travailler des pluies
[1:30:26] (inaudible)
[1:30:27] honnêtement.
[1:30:28] - Merci!
[1:30:30] >> Closing of meeting. - Je
[1:30:32] propose.
[1:30:36] (rires)
[1:30:37] Alors, merci beaucoup.
[1:30:39] And thank you very much for
[1:30:40] those of you that stayed here
[1:30:42] until the end of the meeting.
[1:30:44] It's much appreciated that you
[1:30:46] show a real interest in your
[1:30:48] city and not only in your area.
[1:30:52] And you are here to listen to
[1:30:55] all the activities of the
[1:30:57] Council. I really appreciate
[1:31:00] your presence. - Et ceux qui ont
[1:31:04] regardé la webdiffusion, merci
[1:31:07] beaucoup pour votre intérêt dans
[1:31:08] la ville de Baie qu'ils Field.
[1:31:13] Next month, again, we will see
[1:31:15] you. Thank you.
[1:31:22] | | |