[0:06] Alors bonsoir et bienvenue à cette séance
ordinaire du conseil municipal du 23 février
[0:19] 2026. Welcome to our Regular Council meeting
of February twenty third twenty twenty six.
[0:27] Nous allons procéder à l'ouverture de la
séance avec l'adoption de l'ordre du jour.
[0:34] Il y aura une modification à l'ordre du jour
au point 60.6 point 60.6, étant
[0:45] l'autorisation de la fermeture complète de
rue pour l'événement Marché BO the
[0:49] authorization of the complete Street closure
of the event at Bull market. Ça sera
[0:55] probablement et fort sûrement à un conseil
prochain. Donc, ouverture ou adoption de
[1:01] l'ordre du jour? Adoption of the City of Beaconsfield
Regular Council of February
[1:08] Twenty twenty. Adopté. Alors, avant de passer
à la période de questions du public Before
we
[1:20] move to the public question period the commandant
of our SP commandant of the SPVM at the
[1:28] police de quartier Station number one. Monsieur
le commandant Gosselin est avec
[1:34] nous. Bonsoir, monsieur le commandant. Bonsoir.
Merci d'être avec nous. Merci
[1:39] beaucoup. On vous écoute. Merci. Euh. Bonjour
tout le monde. Je vais commencer. J'avais une
[1:45] petite discussion à l'extérieur avec quelqu'un
parmi vous qui me posait des questions sur
les
[1:49] introductions par effraction, mais j'ai une
annonce à vous faire. En fait, le 12 février
[1:53] dernier, on a procédé à l'arrestation de
trois suspects d'introduction par effraction.
[1:58] Suite aux enquêtes qu'on a faites, ces trois
suspects ont été arrêtés. Il y a eu des
[2:03] perquisitions à leur domicile ainsi qu'à
une unité d'entreposage. On est en train
[2:08] de déterminer maintenant quels dossiers sont
reliés. Ces trois suspects là. Comprenez
que
[2:15] l'analyse de toutes les pièces qui ont été
saisies est un travail de moine. Donc toutes
[2:20] les reliées aux différentes introductions
par effraction, surtout que ces suspects là
[2:25] travaillaient sur toute l'île et même la
périphérie. On sait qu'ils ont fait certaines
[2:31] introductions par effraction dans notre secteur.
Dans le pédicure, on est encore en
[2:35] train de déterminer lesquels pour fermer les
dossiers. Également, ce que je
[2:40] mentionnais avec la dame mentionnait peut être
d'amener des petits points de prévention.
[2:46] Effectivement, la majorité des vols sont pour
des bijoux ou des objets de petits, De voir
[2:52] des des télévisions se faire voler, ça ne
se fait plus maintenant. Donc la dame me
[2:59] suggérait de vous mentionner quand vous partez
en voyage, de peut être mettre vos bijoux
ou
[3:03] vos objets de valeur dans des coffres forts
ou à la banque. C'est une excellente un
[3:08] excellent moyen de prévention également.
Ce que j'aimerais rajouter Vous connaissez
vos
[3:13] secteurs mieux que je peux les connaître.
Donc si vous voyez des personnes suspectes
sur vos
[3:17] rues, ne jamais hésiter à nous appeler pour
qu'on puisse aller enquêter sur le sujet.
Si je
[3:23] continue au niveau des activités qui ont été
faites avec mes patrouilleurs, mes
[3:28] patrouilleurs à vélo ont fait plusieurs patrouilles
dans le parc Angel Woods, ont donné
[3:34] plusieurs avertissements pour des chiens sans
laisse et également des constats
[3:37] d'infraction. Donc de faire attention de garder
vos chiens en laisse. Au niveau de la
[3:44] sécurité routière, on a fait depuis le début
de l'année, là, plus de 22 opérations en
[3:49] répression, dont la majorité pour des opérations
de vitesse et principalement sur le
[3:55] boulevard Saint-Charles. Au niveau de mes activités,
de mes agentes sociocommunautaires,
[4:00] nous avons fait plusieurs présentations sur
la cyber sécurité auprès de nos jeunes
[4:05] dans les écoles, entre autres à l'école
Christmas Park et à Bgsf SS. On me demandait
au
[4:13] dernier conseil les cafés avec un policier.
J'ai pas la date encore parce que c'est vraiment
[4:20] un programme qui est corporatif, mais en fait,
il est possible qu'on ne fasse pas cette
[4:25] journée là à Beaconsfield, qu'on le fasse
dans un autre de mes municipalités, mais j'ai
[4:29] demandé à mes policiers de répertorier tous
les événements qu'il peut y avoir dans chacune
[4:33] des municipalités, entre autres Beaconsfield,
où mes policiers pourraient venir faire un
acte
[4:36] de présence. Et si vous avez d'autres activités
que vous aimeriez qu'on participe ou que
[4:42] vous désiriez faire un café avec un policier
un peu plus personnel, on est toujours
[4:47] ouvert à faire ça. Je vous invite si justement,
il y a des activités que. En fait, ce que
[4:53] j'ai demandé à mes policiers patrouilleurs,
mes policiers de mon groupe de soutien, mes
[4:58] agents sociocommunautaires vont beaucoup sur
des activités communautaires. Mais j'ai
[5:01] demandé cette année que mes policiers patrouilleurs
s'implique également de plus en
[5:05] plus. Donc, comme je vous disais, on est en
train de répertorier toutes les
[5:09] activités qu'on peut avoir dans les cinq municipalités.
Et ce que je demande à mes policiers,
[5:14] c'est vraiment de faire un acte de présence,
de venir vous jaser pour, euh, faire du
[5:19] rapprochement avec vous, de créer des opportunités
de rencontres. Fait que si vous
[5:24] avez des choses spéciales, n'hésitez pas
à rentrer en communication avec nous. Vous
[5:27] pouvez par notre site internet, sur le site
du SPVM poste de Quartier un, nous écrire
[5:33] directement à ma lieutenante ou à moi si
vous avez des questions. Merci, commandant.
[5:38] Est-ce qu'il y a des questions pour le commandant?
Do you have questions? Please go to the
[5:43] microphone? Président Actually, I leave in
your own words and I love going there and I
love
[5:56] seeing the dog, you know, including the flesh.
Hyper tiger dog, You know jump up on
[6:04] me and give because they don't bother me and
the lack of animal services in Beaconsfield.
[6:11] Really really concerns me because I'm terrified
that when there isn't a proper humain
[6:20] animal service or spk enforcing the laws that
the police are devoted to any dog complaints
[6:27] in place like Andrew would now I know the sound
by the agglomeration and not be
[6:33] beaconsfield, but it really concerns me because
it's just a matter of time before the dog
[6:38] is being shot by police last year. There were
two cases of dog being shot by the SPVM at
[6:45] this really concerns me that as a certified
compassionate city. It would be a real shame
[6:53] anywhere for the dog and being shot by the
police and I hope that never happened in
[6:58] Beaconsfield, and this is exactly exactly what
we need human education and why we need
[7:04] to move beyond the tiny dogpound behind this
building and why we need to have the
[7:12] proper humane society or spk. For the commandant.
My question is will the SPVM revised its
[7:24] procedural regarding animal services and does
the SPVM have canine encounter training to
[7:33] human. Dog situation. Si vous permettez, je
vais répondre en français. Madame Corrado,
Ça
[7:46] vous va? En fait, pour répondre à votre question,
nos procédures, c'est pas la
[7:57] procédure d'abattre des animaux, à moins
que ce soit un cas de légitime défense. Pour
répondre
[8:05] à votre autre question qui était si on avait
des formations ou. Policy. Mais
[8:16] Miss Corrado, we will not have the debate with
the commandant is your question if? You want
[8:28] to clarification. Okay, so come back to the
microphone, so that everyone here and online
at
[8:35] home can better understand you. My French is
not good. So I'm not sure what the word in
[8:41] French Procedural is a procedural or the policy
that the police follow that the
[8:50] common that will will make sure that the other
police officer following the procedure of the
[8:56] police is that the police follows so that it
that policing is kept consistant
[9:01] throughout the and they have procedural or
policy and different things, including
[9:06] animal control and also asking about the training
after so you want training on the procedure.
[9:15] Yes, we have policy for the animal control
and yes, we have formation for that. Question
is.
[9:27] This one last question, madame Corrado, is
is it focused on animal control or animal
[9:36] protection and when it was last updated because
I know in Toronto, the procedural are
[9:43] they basically are promoting the killing of
animals and they talk about livestock running
to
[9:47] the streets there from the century. So when
it was the policy adopted and is it animal
[9:55] control or animal control is not under the.
SPVM control, it's for the spk or other
[10:07] organisms. It's not for it from the SPVM. Merci.
Merci. OK, before we move with the
[10:17] question period. Avant la période de questions,
j'aimerais faire quelques
[10:22] commentaires et quelques remarques ici. Mes
collègues du conseil ont aussi quelque chose
[10:26] à dire. Je les invite par la suite à prendre
la parole et on procédera par la suite à
la
[10:31] période de questions. Donc, j'aimerais vous
parler de certains points à l'ordre du
[10:36] jour qui sont sujets à un vote plus tard ce
soir. Comme précédemment mentionné, lors
[10:47] notamment de l'adoption du budget et pour une
sixième année consécutive, notre calcul
[10:52] de la quote-part pour les services d'agglomération,
qui a été imposée unilatéralement par
[10:58] le gouvernement du Québec, représente une
surtaxe de plus de 2 millions de dollars cette
[11:04] année, bien que les nouvelles valeurs foncières,
entrée en vigueur le 1eʳ janvier dernier,
[11:09] réduisent normalement la quote-part payable
par Beaconsfield cette année, nous
[11:16] estimons encore donc verser 2 millions de dollars
de plus que si le contrat avait été
[11:20] respecté. Le contrat de 2008, où toutes les
villes, incluant Montréal et le gouvernement
du
[11:26] Québec, avaient été respectées. Love again,
this evening, we are posing under items, sixty
[11:33] point one, two authorize the payment under
protest of our agglomération share as a result
[11:42] if this resolution passes our claim will now
exceeded twenty-two million dollars.
[11:50] Furthermore I think it's important announcement
that a lot of people have been
[11:54] wondering about when is the trial or the hearing
and take place and so our legal action
[12:03] against the Quebec government and the city
of Montreal has reached a decisive milestone,
[12:08] The superior court of Quebec has scheduled
the hearing for this lawsuit that we have
[12:16] launched for the period from January twenty-seven
to February fifteen two thousand
[12:22] twenty-eight as the first date first firm that
allowing for a complete examination of the
[12:31] dispute until then the city will continue to
act diligently to protect the financial
[12:36] interest of us the citizens while remaining
open to the far and equitable resolution if
[12:45] Possible. Être membre de l'agglomération
comporte son lot de défis et parfois une
[12:52] bonne dose de frustration. Mais un point demeure
essentiel et je pense que tout le monde est
[12:59] d'accord, il vaut infiniment mieux être une
ville au sein de l'agglomération qu'un
[13:06] arrondissement au sein de Montréal. Better
to be a city within the agglomération, then
[13:10] to be the bureau of Montreal. Bien que notre
localisation sur l'île fasse de nous des
[13:18] Montréalais, géographiquement, nous demeurons
de cœur et d'esprit des résidents de
[13:23] Beaconsfield avant tout. C'est une réalité
dont nous bénéficions. Pardon? Une
[13:29] réalité qui n'a pas toujours été acquise.
Some twenty years ago specifically on January
[13:37] first twenty twenty two thousand and six Beaconsfield
became one again et city
[13:46] autonomous in some respect after four years
of being a borough with biosurfit within
[13:52] the then amalgamated city of Montreal. Cet
anniversaire marque un moment déterminant
de
[13:59] notre histoire municipale, un moment où notre
communauté a retrouvé sa voix, son identité
[14:06] et sa capacité d'orienter son avenir. Twenty
years ago this reconstitution followed the
[14:12] Provence with the process of first municipal
realization or murder in the early two
[14:20] thousands after the two thousand four referendum
that the Quebec government held the
[14:26] adoption of the Quebec decree reconstituée
in Beaconsfield, allow us to emerge again as
a
[14:34] self governing municipality within Montreal.
The agglomeration. So as we marked
[14:43] this milestone. I find it very important to
recognize the people who leadership and
[14:48] dedication have shape the beaconsfield that
we know today over the past twenty years five
[14:54] Meyer and numerous counselors have devoted
their time and energy to better in our
[14:59] community through public services doesn't have
committed residence hundreds of committed
[15:06] residents have also step forward as volunteers
offering their time knowledge and
[15:11] expertise to strengthen our program committee
and civic life and contributes to the
[15:19] character of that we have as a municipality.
J'aimerais par contre souligner au premier
[15:26] rang de cette continuité se trouve Monsieur
Patrice Boileau, dont la contribution à
[15:31] Beaconsfield s'étend sur près de quatre décennies.
Son long mandat, son professionnalisme
[15:36] et sa profonde connaissance institutionnelle
ont été essentiels pour assurer la
[15:42] stabilité. La transition de Beaconsfield,
d'une ville à un arrondissement. And then
after
[15:48] that from a borough to once again a city. Director
general since two thousand and six
[15:57] January first, two thousand and six the very
year our city regained its status as a city.
[16:03] Il a guidé notre administration avec constance
et intégrité à travers les changements de
[16:08] conseils, l'évolution des structures régionales,
la complexité croissante de la
[16:13] gouvernance municipale. Félicitations et merci,
Monsieur Boileau. Merci. And so
[16:27] just the second and so looking forward. Looking
back is one thing, but looking forward is
[16:34] probably even more important. This Twentieth
Anniversary is a moment to reflect for sure
on
[16:39] how far we've come since two thousand and six
et ringwood city the strength and identity
[16:44] and community that continue to drive. Alors
regardons désormais vers les 20
[16:50] prochaines années et essayons d'intégrer
les valeurs qui nous caractérisent, qui guideront
[16:57] notre constitution, notre démocratie locale
et qui feront de nous une communauté vibrante.
[17:04] Proud and ready to tackle the challenges ahead.
Je vous remercie. Maintenant, la parole
[17:10] à mes collègues du Conseil. Madame Godin
Oui, merci. Oui, j'ai eu les félicitations,
[17:16] monsieur Boileau. Je voulais juste prendre
un moment pour faire un petit speech pour le
[17:23] comité de culture et loisirs. On est à la
recherche d'un nouveau membre pour se joindre
[17:28] au comité de culture. And let your committee
is looking for a new members, and the details
[17:33] are in the current contact magazines the committee
looks to advise the council on
[17:38] various culture and leisure initiatives and
we draw on the strength of our resistance and
[17:44] the committee. So if you would like to apply,
please look in the contact or online and thank
[17:51] you. Merci. Thank you anybody else. Madame
Léveillé. J'aimerais. J'aimerais
[18:00] remercier Monsieur Boileau pour ses 20 ans
de service avec la ville de Beaconsfield. Bien
que
[18:05] je ne connaisse. Depuis un peu de temps, il
est évident qu'il fait preuve d'un dévouement
[18:11] exceptionnel, d'un engagement sans faille et
d'une véritable passion pour notre communauté.
[18:15] Tout au long de ces deux décennies, Monsieur
Boileau, votre travail a eu un impact
[18:20] durable sur notre ville et a inspiré tous
ceux qui vous entourent. J'aimerais vous
[18:23] remercier pour votre excellent service. Félicitations
pour cet accomplissement. Je. Casser
[18:34] mercredi. Thank you Patrice. Congratulations.
I I did not prepare a speech for any words,
[18:42] but I'll I'll speak from the heart. It's been
nine years that I have worked with you and
[18:49] and years before that sitting sitting in the
in the audience watching watching what you
do.
[18:58] It's not hard to find them that are quantified.
There are people out there that have
[19:04] degrees and that have the qualification. But
it's a rare occasion that you find someone
[19:10] that is incredibly qualified and truly care
about what they do and care is about the people
[19:17] on your team. You're the first leader you.
You care for your people. But you're the first
[19:25] leader also of our city and it's been cleared
to me from day one. You care about
[19:32] Beaconsfield and for that I thank you and not
just as the council as the residents of
[19:37] Beaconsfield. Thank you for your years of service
and more to come. Well, I think of the
[19:47] words of being said Patrice again myself I've
known Patrice for years coming into two
[19:53] council and I've been amazing years. I think
I've learned a lot not only from Patrice, but
[19:59] everybody but the specific Patrice we've interact
with a lot over the years. I think
[20:03] like to think I have learned something from
us to but, but I think one thing is clear and
[20:09] I'm sure it'll be a team. I'm here in already
is just in terms of in terms of your
[20:15] devotion to the city. It's remarquable. It's
unwavering and it's sincère. And it's
[20:21] something we see every day and everything emails
exchange and everything you do it at the
[20:26] heart of everything you do and I think we feel
that coming from you as well, so we also
[20:31] feel that in that we really feel. There's a
way that we have working alongside us when
[20:36] we think of those things in terms of devotion
to the community on the inside people
[20:41] may not see that we see it all the things and
various they do they think that we do, but
in
[20:46] terms of a leader. I say it's off for that
it's extremely I know you take that very
[20:51] seriously as well, but it's something that
I don't think that the public necessary six
[20:55] on a daily basis for us weekly basis like we
do so I want to thank you for that and managing
[21:01] the city, so well from the leadership perspectives,
so I really appreciate that and
[21:04] thank you for that and continued success in
that direction. So thank you,
[21:08] Patrice. Merci. Oh Castle Rock of sound. Thank
you very much. Congratulations. Queen. Last
[21:22] but not least, hopefully Patrice as a new counselor.
Just like to thank you for all
[21:28] your help getting us up to speed your years
of experience. Really show you when we have
[21:33] questions and we need to find out what what
we need to know how to do our job? You've been
[21:40] in this resource for us. So I thank you for
that. Thank you and you may wonder why we're
[21:46] doing it in the third week of February, but.
Absent for the January council meeting. That's
[21:53] when we would have done it normally because
that was marking the Twentieth
[21:58] anniversary of both the city becoming well
becoming a city and Mister Boileau being
[22:06] nominated as the general. On va procéder à
la période de questions. WE have a new
[22:12] procedure last month, I forgot the question
at the end. So we have thirty minutes for the
[22:19] question period. If you have a question, please
proceed to the microphone, I would prefer if
[22:24] you have a question that you all line up at
the microphone that will give me an idea of.
[22:31] Combien de personnes veulent poser des questions?
It's one question and one follow up
[22:37] question and I'll try to answer as many questions
as possible. So a brief introduction and
[22:48] then the questions. Corrado President of saint
Andrew avenue and my question is well
[22:58] the city council. Please listen to the oppositions
regarding the demolition at one hundred
[23:07] eleven saint Andrew Avenue, the proposed rebuild
will be. Probably twice as big as the
[23:18] current building and my question is how long
with the demolition and the rebuild take
[23:27] and what would be doing to. Give residences
any you know about when the demolition is
[23:39] going to be with the city. How all this city
deal with added dust and pollution and nose
and
[23:48] disruption of the street with with construction
vehicles. How will the city consider either
[23:58] rejecting ideally rejecting this. This demolition
or at the very pleased with this city,
[24:06] consider reducing the size of the proposed
new building and will will this question is
with
[24:15] this city council, Please look at the opposition
and review the demolition decisions made
[24:24] by the Demolition Council. All of the information
that you referred to is part of the
[24:32] field that will be decided upon on tonight
as we get to that IDM on the agenda. I can't
say
[24:42] very much right now as to where we're going
to be headed. What you're one of your question
was
[24:50] how long will the demolition take usually demolition
is overweight. Within forty eight
[24:58] hours of its start in terms of dust and noise
control. WE have believes that applied and
what
[25:09] I can tell you is perhaps we can look with
the administration to see if
[25:15] residences can be informed ahead of time, we
will try and find out if that's possible or
[25:23] not, and if it is will try and do that thank
you. Good evening everyone, of course. It's
about
[25:36] the bus on the montrose. My name is Nancy Ryan,
I'm a resident Montrose background at
[25:42] the meeting between the residents and the STM
in January. It was confirmed that
[25:47] the city of Beaconsfield was actually involved
in the bus route. Discussion contrary to
[25:53] some common in prayer committee meetings. My
question is on the basis of the council and
city
[26:01] director decide what information is shared
and when with the Beaconsfield taxpayers
[26:07] and how does this align with the promise of
transparency made by the maire? Intellection
[26:14] time. Well, thank Ryan, we communicate the
information that is in our position and
[26:23] belong to us in this particular case and as
mentioned before the entire information that
was
[26:32] provided to you as part of the two meetings
that the STM held with mount rose. Residence
was
[26:39] the Propriété. Propriété. Propriété belongs
to the STM and we were not at liberty to
[26:48] disclose it. So the problem was at the STM
said that you were involved with the decision
[26:55] making without consulting, the people most
likely and that debated that we want you know
[27:04] the need that we were consulted. WE were consulting,
we attended meetings that has been
[27:11] expressed before that does not give us the
liberty to divulge the plan that the STM shared
[27:17] with us. It's the same thing for different
ministry and different services. If the
[27:25] agglo has a plan for. Le grand parc de l'Ouest
and Angels would untel they're ready to go
[27:32] public with it and fortunately. WE can not
share the information that being
[27:37] presented to us. I'm looking forward to many
more in the future. Good evening everybody.
[27:50] My name is David Aurel, President of fairway
drive, also President of Beaconsfield
[27:55] Citizens Association. My question evening revolves
around municipal tax. It is
[28:01] comes to not being aware, but I've pulled all
the people in my neighbourhood as far as
[28:10] about six streets left and right and everybody
evaluation seems to have gone through the
[28:15] roof. I personally for my own residence municipal.
Evaluations went up a hundred
[28:25] thousand dollars. What does that representing
fifteen pour 100? Two? To make a more
[28:37] accurate. Thank you so I took the liberty.
Of reading your exposé or money from the maire
[28:48] in this morning and quite frankly you left
me more confused than I was when I got
[28:55] out of bed this morning, so doing due diligence
all day. I have discovered that basically
[29:04] the tax right that we received our our tax
is that we just probably everybody just go
in
[29:10] the last week or so is based on that evaluation
and the percentage attributed to each
[29:19] of the city or the agglomération and they
are all together to make the final
[29:23] price that you pay so my question is who determine
the new evaluation role of the
[29:33] house because for mind to go up the hundred
thousand dollars along with my neighbours and
[29:39] people as far as six streets away. We're all
wondering who will look up and said we're out
[29:46] and left field. Yeah. So the answer to your
question is the city of Montreal, the
[29:53] Evaluation service de l'évaluation foncière.
That essentially take the value so
[30:01] the role that was deposited in late September
early October that came into force on January
[30:08] the first the evaluation of our property is
on the territory and it's the same thing
[30:13] everywhere else on the island is it's a polaroid
a snapshot of the market value in July,
[30:19] twenty twenty four and so they take you know
different neighborhoods. They look at the
[30:27] cells. They look at increase the value as a
result of permits, bing bing issued for
[30:35] renovation I apologize and so on and so far.
So the way we presented the budget and its
[30:42] it's a something that happens every three years
when there's a new role, we that part. Is it
[30:48] now, we will go with the average value or the
value of the average homes in
[30:55] Beaconsfield. One point one million dollars
and this meant for twenty twenty six and
[31:01] increase from the previous budget year of 6.6
%, which is the average increase in value
[31:08] as a result of the assessment role that came
in for all of the sixty eight hundred
[31:15] properties on the territory and so depending
on in your case twelve point 6.2 %. So our
you
[31:25] know the number that we end up with that 3.8
% tax increase for that specific property
[31:33] increase that 6.6 %. Well, you are your share
of the pi sixteen. Plus pour 100 balloon
[31:42] up and that's unfortunate some people as I've
mentioned in the letters that you received
in
[31:48] the mail and the contact and as part of the
presentation of the budget last month, some
[31:54] residents the majority of residence. Seventy
pour 100 are below. Trois point 3.8 % and I
[32:02] believe if I remember correctly thirty to be
presented are in fact getting a tax reduction
as
[32:10] a result of the shift in value the relative
shift in value, so that's the long and the
short
[32:19] answer is the evaluation is conducted every
three years by Montreal. ITS Montreal. That's
[32:27] doing something of random calculation as two
because nobody is certainly visited my
[32:34] house two evaluate the establishment of value.
It's not random and it's not random.
[32:40] It is based on cells is based on cells in a
given area. Quinze Mercury. Thank you.
[32:50] Maire Saint-Jean David. Thanks for the question.
If if you are concerned with the evaluation
[32:58] of your property. There is a process by which
you can challenge that with Montreal.
[33:03] Now, I don't remember off the top of my head
with the daily are the deadlines, but it's
all
[33:09] on their website and and if you are concerned
with that I truly you to just évaluation foncière
[33:15] Montréal and just follow the process because
everybody that I like I said I have gone at
[33:23] least, it doesn't streets in every different
directions and I'm out about something people
[33:27] now and. Everybody is this one up approximately
one hundred fifty. Neighborhood three years
[33:37] ago. It was up to fifty pour 100 increase in
evaluation some neighborhood had remained
[33:43] pretty much at the same level others are going
up. And so you know I understand where you
are
[33:49] coming from its its shocking to some absolutely
just can't help others have a question or
[33:57] related when this is another other thing to
some of you may have done this, but in those
[34:03] that are now we're just further to what if
you go to property assessment. Montreal is
[34:08] something like that it will take you where
you can actually see your assessment online
and
[34:12] the historical numbers of their, but if you
scroll down a little bit, there's a video and
[34:16] there's a little video that kind of explain
how they calculate? How much approach is
[34:20] the calculation where the criteria involved
with you give you a Description descriptive
[34:24] of their their approach and their search of
philosophy around how that's put together.
[34:29] So it's in it's really hard to explain all
that and finally we don't have all that information
[34:34] that type of your finger, but there's a video
and it's my video just on that point alone.
[34:38] So property assessment was just Google that
you'll see years and then you can scroll down.
[34:43] There's a video there I found it very helpful
when I looked at the back. And I looked at
it
[34:48] again. Not too long. So it's helpful and anybody
else. It's something to have a look at
[34:52] thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening.
Mr Maire Counselor Boileau. Dominique
[35:12] and Nathalie. Nathalie. It's there's there's
a light on it. So I'm sorry, I can't see. I
[35:22] don't know if this is the time and the meeting
to bring up what I want to bring up, but
[35:27] you are your secret and you don't want to leave
in Beaconsfield. I've been living
[35:36] in the West Island for a long time Beaconsfield
residents for ten years and I send you all
[35:43] and email, which was rather long on Friday,
because I had a lot of points to cover, but
I
[35:50] think they're all important points around the
treatment of January. There was this notice
[36:00] that was put in our mailbox. I'm at group accueil
and there for a long time is planning to
[36:06] leave there for the rest of my life. Not so
sure now anyway, this talks about the building
[36:14] to be built on the tennis court right in front
of our home that we went and it doesn't seem
[36:20] proposed building. It is a building. It was
like it was a done deal and it is now, I
[36:27] didn't talk to a lot of my neighbour. WE don't
leave in a high rise. It's winter time. WE
[36:32] came out like a little flower in the spring
time. WE don't see our neighbors and in the
[36:37] winter time. WE go from our care to our individual
doors and go inside in spring time.
[36:43] WE talked to people so however, I've talk to
everybody received this because I spoke to
the
[36:52] neighbors and I said are you going to the information
station on February eleventh
[36:57] about the new building building on the tennis
court, and they went what what you talking
[37:03] about and I explained and they were not pleased,
but I didn't talk to people well. I would
[37:16] have asked for a reply from everybody to my
email. So I hope I will receive it and I
[37:22] hope you will take into consideration the point
that I've brought up because my
[37:27] father was the building inspectors. I used
to go on building with him. Take this
[37:31] note. I'm not somebody who's just you know
I've had for houses. I've built one. I have
[37:36] a little bit of knowledge about this and I
would just hope reading the back of somebody's
[37:41] cars. And then I'll finish. I think it's really
important to read my letters. And it's on
[37:48] the back of one of your business. Car it's
our mission is to provide and inclusive
[37:53] community which offers a high quality of life
and respect the environment both natural and
[37:59] man-made through responsible and innovative
management. Nobody wants this building,
[38:06] nobody who has the tennis court wants this
building to be built. Thank you. You don't
have
[38:12] questions. That's all my question is so regarding
that project. Thank you. Later this
[38:23] evening. Okay, I don't know if you were here,
but just prior to this morning, we had a
[38:29] public consultation meeting and so next month.
There will be here a public consultation
[38:36] meeting. So you're welcome to and that's what
I would bring up again you and it's that
[38:43] before the whole meeting starts great good
to know. Thank you very much welcome. My name
is
[38:57] Nikki. I just moved to Beaconsfield. Recently
actually and it was a life-long goal of
[39:01] me and my husband to moved to Beaconsfield
because we love the area. I'm sure you all
know
[39:06] of me cause I've made quite a bit of noise.
WE bought a one point two million dollar house
[39:11] where and twenty years old that are for this.
What are hard earned money? WE didn't have
[39:15] help from our parent or anything, we both the
house and marches, we renovated it for
[39:19] nine months and we moved to get notified by
not you guys No-one sitting here, you need
to
[39:26] everyone, but by residences telling me that
I was gonna be put right in front of my house.
[39:31] Not only is going to be right in front of the
house. I'm not. I don't ask a question. I'm
[39:37] gonna stop. Apologise but the language you
are using calling us. I have proof that you
guys
[39:42] are here. You can see it down. Please. I spoke
to Mr Aref Salem, who is the chairman of
[39:48] the board of directors at the STM? Mission
impossible. The reasons why not now the city
[39:55] that was coming to filibuster and I will not
allow you to call everyone around the table
[40:01] here. Lire so please it down or apologize me.
I don't want. OK? No ok everybody, please.
[40:23] Calling you. A lire. For calling you, I have
a question so get to the question please,
[40:31] I was so I spoke to Mr Salem asking you to
get to the question. Ma question I spoke
[40:42] forty five on the phone with mister you ask
it. I'm sorry sir. But I will conduct this
[40:53] morning the way I see it fits if you do not
approve, you may leave. You know it. She said
[41:00] more than three words asking for functional.
OK, let's see you have a question. Yes, but
[41:08] I'm I'm just building up to it. Not everyone.
Thank you, but it up to for longer than I didn't
[41:14] take up that much time the council that you
should respect for citizens as well. Monsieur
[41:21] Lebel, Monsieur Lebel, I will get to my questions
apologize. Monsieur Lebel, I will not
[41:30] tolerate this I've just asking for respect
on both sides. Yes, you haven't anything except
[41:36] speak out of order. You have a question Get
in line and ask the question untill such time
[41:43] that you are in line at the microphone, please
remind caillots. Miss you have a
[41:51] question for me. Aref Salem on the phone and
he told me that it was not possible that
[41:59] resonance were not aware that I was coming
on rose drive and you said in the last council
[42:06] meeting and I have it here. Meilleur Saint-Jean
indicate that the city of Beaconsfield
[42:11] has not been informed of how many routes will
save the rem and the city expect the STM to
[42:17] make the information public soon. I don't know
what you're reading from the meeting. The
[42:24] December meeting that you just posted in our.
Ago may be well that at that time. WE went
in
[42:32] the position to come on it and we weren't informed
officially of what they would be so just
[42:38] for my understanding the master of the STM,
Chairman of the board of directors is not right
[42:45] when he is promising me. He he told me. It's
impossible. The residence were not middleware.
[42:50] So you're telling me. That's not accurate that
the terms of the board of the city. And what
[42:55] I told you. I'm commenting on what we were
allowed to tell our residence and when we were
[43:02] allowed to tell the residence what we said
all along was that untill such time that the
STM
[43:07] is ready to roll out its roots and make it
refonte public. WE can't come the only exception
[43:16] that happen was the one regarding the two what
we now know to be the two eleven x,
[43:22] which is proposed. On mount Rose, ailment and
Mount rose. Yes and the reason why we want
[43:31] the reason why we the reason why we commented
on that was because question that been here
[43:37] and we put the residents of mount roses with
it in contact with the STM. Just my name is
[43:46] when the city of Beaconsfield, except the right
on rose accepted that we never accepted
[43:52] the right and rose, we were not decisions all
in establishing the right on the month rose.
So
[43:57] you never accepted with the STM. You never
say we accept as it was probably the previous
mail.
[44:03] I know was done before the previous maire Beaconsfield
never see that with the STM and
[44:08] said that we expect we accept that the right.
He's gonna go on rose drive. I can't do What
[44:14] did we did not do that It could before someone
would have had to accept the STM does not walk
[44:20] into the city and choose the right well, we
can agree to disagree on that get in and who
[44:28] accepted it. WE do not accept that the city
of Beaconsfield, did not accept the STM bus
[44:35] general. Your question. To make it a little
lighter if you can. But you don't have to my
name
[44:47] is Desmond Schaefer. My question is I don't
know who to ask the question to because I
[44:55] asked questions to urban planning who told
me to ask my counselor which I did and my
[45:04] counselor responded to me to ask urban planning.
So I'm getting the run around and I
[45:11] see the property that I own is coming up on
today's agenda which one is it one of the five
[45:18] lake view? And what is the question? If you
bring it up, there is two, there's two,
[45:28] there's two things like after the inspection
as you know when you build, it's a brand new
[45:33] construction and when you build a house you
have to give a fifty thousand dollars deposit
[45:40] to as a guarantee that everything is. Conforme
to the what was approved and city by
[45:50] those. So there was two stipulations that the
inspector came up with the second one. I
[45:59] fully agree with is that we have to. WE have
to take a little bit of earth away to to
[46:06] make it level. We're finished just before just
after the first snowfall. WE couldn't get
[46:11] a level on it. But now we we know we have to
do that the first one where it is the.
[46:21] Relating to the building permits application
to modify and already approved plans. So
[46:26] what happened here was without my knowledge
as it was happening, we heard contractors
[46:33] and the contractors, there's three gables in
front of the house, the pignon and they make
[46:39] them out. There is here and the committee is
doesn't approach of it. I went back to the
[46:50] contractor after the facts and he said it was
designed flaw and in order to insulate the
[46:58] house properly and not have a vice caché somewhere
down the line or something like that
[47:04] there is that in order to get the proper insulation
access to that those are those areas of
[47:11] the house. OK, So what is the question is what
do I do to get my fifty thousand dollars
[47:18] deposit back if the committee doesn't agree
with this is where I'm completely within the
[47:24] laws of the city. That's the question. Well,
there are from what I understand there are
two
[47:31] things that plays. There is the zoning and
there's the architectural integration and
[47:37] the items that you're pointing out to are part
of the review process under the planning and
[47:44] architectural integration. Of the CCQ. The
public advisory committee makes recommendations
[47:52] to council and we will be voting later on tonight
on those two items. Understand I
[48:01] tried to try to get forward on this before
the tonight a month. Now I'm trying to get
answers
[48:09] to understand that the process can be difficult
and confusing sometimes, but I can't tell you
[48:18] more than than what I have already told you
and I always the sea, you have given your
[48:25] recommendations and I'm asking you to I don't
know if you just go with what they say. Are
you
[48:32] actually? You guys actually look at it individual
and say this. This guy is about to lose
[48:37] fifty and for eight like I don't know if you,
if you are as a fellow citizen. You feel
[48:43] from you a little bit in this. You know if
you are just go now, you don't recommend it.
But
[48:48] like I know you guys, have a say and you know
how I was trying to stand with you look
[48:56] at the files. WE don't always agree with the
recommendations. Sometimes we see them are
side,
[49:04] so ok. So I know you have looked at them. I'm
gonna take the site and thank you. I guess
[49:10] I will wait and wait and see what happens.
You are welcome. Still have time with you,
miss.
[49:23] I want to thank you first of all all of you
and thank you. You're of us Somewhat éradique
[49:35] presence of people. I want to actually model
of the behavior that I think should be expected
[49:41] of citizens asking questions. So that's the
question is about the bachelor. The boring
below
[49:50] for eighteen point 6 million $ and if I wanted
to leave you with a few phrases. You would
[49:58] be about risk transparency that servicing and
the implication of that for resident tax
[50:08] players powers with corresponding and I thank
you for your response and you
[50:13] confirmed my understanding of how this is all
going to proceed. You are also indicated
[50:19] that the administration is going to review
the possibility of producing and amortization
[50:24] illustrations to help citizens understand what
is actually going on? So my question is
[50:30] could council of the voice. Whether the year.
Repayment projection could which were
[50:37] included principal interest will be prepared
and published. So that's for the year
[50:42] repayment projections, including principles
and interests will be prepared and
[50:47] published and when might expect to see that
be available, we all live within budget. WE
all
[50:55] know that price is go up. WE all can afford
to make decisions when we know what is
[51:00] coming ahead if it's going to be an increase
and so that's the context within which I'm
[51:06] asking questions so risk transparency that
servicing and the implications for citizens.
[51:13] Thank you. Thank you, Duncan. I just want to
know that you are concerned as a taxpayers
or for
[51:22] taxpayers our shared before we are counselor
or Mayer. WE are residents of this city and
[51:30] we're taxpayers as well so that concern is
shared by everyone in the room what I've told
you
[51:38] and what all right here for the benefit of
everyone is that will look into what can be
done
[51:43] because we're playing with different scenarios
and if possible, you know the
[51:49] information will be made available. So thank
you for your question. WE have been at
[51:58] it for thirty minutes, but with the approval
of my fellow member of council. I would
[52:04] continue this question period for the time
being your back and that's ok. If however,
if
[52:14] you want to address us on the specific idem,
we can call you up when we get to date Idem,
[52:22] and we'll move on with the with the rest of
the questions. Hmm. Thank you alright. Monsieur
[52:30] Lebel. Good evening. Hi there. So I wasn't
actually gonna come speak tonight because I
didn't
[52:36] really have a question prepared at the time.
I wanted to address the situation. I was
[52:40] addressed by our council by my name, Mister
Maire himself. I don't think that's very far
[52:45] very responsible, especially since the only
reason why I spoke out of turn in the
[52:49] council. Today was because one of the residents
held at the person in the question, and I
[52:53] ask our council to please respectfully as that
citizens and council. Respect the manner
[52:58] of the core of the hearing right now that being
said I do have something that I had
[53:03] prepared that I was going to ask. Me just pull
it up. So. I'm really frustrated because I
[53:12] was shown for doing something that I would
otherwise think was a good hacked by saying,
[53:16] please act responsibly and this in the scenario
instead of being told that I shouldn't
[53:20] speak out of turn, I would really appreciate
some clarity on the threshold of the
[53:24] community support of community support is required
for you to consider the minor significant
[53:29] enough to take a clear position today at three
hundred and twenty-four residents have
[53:34] signed our petition expressing concerns about
the boss and roses drive for for context.
[53:39] The council of District six was elected with
only five hundred and more than half the number
[53:45] of residences formerly voice concerned on a
single issu it suggests meaningful community
[53:51] engagement. Could you please clarify what number
or percentage of citizens our
[53:56] criteria used to determine when you will support
citizens on the matter that is affecting us.
[54:02] Now, I can not because it's a moving target
depending on the different issues at different
[54:07] times involving different people in different
reality. You know so hundred people
[54:14] doesn't constitute support. Well that petition
that you referred to is on change org.
[54:27] It's not the petition that I've been able to
see if you access to it multiples times No,
you
[54:36] have not even emailed the link and when you
click on that link the only information that
you
[54:44] see is the number of potential signing. That's
not true that it also have you information
[54:49] and what you see if you are calling, if I'm
not calling you, it's not false, that's it,
but
[54:55] it is because if you open the link to give
you access to the information that citizens
have
[54:59] calculate not so are you calling me? You know
I'm not. I'm telling you. I'm telling
[55:04] you the truth and you're telling me that you're
not looking into the information
[55:07] that are providing you, Mister Lebel. Sorry
that you take offense that I called you by
[55:12] your property. I don't appreciate that at all
well sir, I'm I'm saying that I was not
[55:17] in council. And you addressed me so now, I'm
addressing back. That's all of this
[55:23] Argumentative combative. I'm not not your no.
I'm not and you and council. All right. You
[55:33] are. I'm gonna be clear one last time. Just
listen to me. Listen to me, Please Captain.
[55:42] Just captain. Captain. Please give me a moment.
Monsieur Lebel. You can listen to me.
[55:56] You don't need the microphone. I also like.
Alright, I have not called allô. I'm just
[56:01] checking. I I'm not calling you. I'm telling
you that my experience is that when I get
[56:08] to that website. I'm not in a position to evaluate.
How many people are well, I can see the
[56:16] number of people who have seen. I don't know
where they are are. I don't know if they live
in
[56:21] Beaconsfield. I don't know where that I see
a number, but beyond that number. There's
[56:27] another there's another number for me at least
that matters in this file, and it's the fact
[56:32] that twenty-seven hundred users will have with
in five hundred years of their property access
[56:41] to the bus to take them to the room or to the
Beaconsfield train station and so that to me
[56:48] is fundamentally a good thing for the community.
This is also a statement by our mayor,
[56:52] because the bus is not run in both directions
for all two thousand seven hundred citizens.
[56:58] I'm not gonna hurt you the fact with you. I
thank you for coming here tonight and good
[57:02] night. Is there is fundamentally something
that I have done to you that has it
[57:06] like made you aggressive toward me. Cause I
don't know what I've done. I don't aggressive
[57:10] towards you. So it's a matter of perspective
and yes, I have thank you and you are done.
No
[57:21] sir. I'm sorry. The question period. There
are people behind you. I've heard you have
[57:25] answered your question. You're not interested
in what I have to say and you want to hear
you.
[57:31] It's not about it's a question period. If you
want to speak to me if you want to speak further
[57:37] with me later tonight. I'm available. But right
now we're going to move to someone else
[57:42] was waiting in line. I think that's where.
Yes. Absolutely after I think so much for the
[57:53] ghost. Roland. Ça y est, j'habite 45 45 ans
à Beaconsfield. Okay, donc je
[58:07] vois dans votre que vous avez envoyé là,
vous allez faire des emprunts pour 25 millions
au
[58:15] total grosso modo. Donc vous avez les revenus
de de Beaconsfield, des taxes, ce qui
[58:21] reste après avoir payé la ville de Montréal,
c'est environ 17 millions. À part les autres,
[58:27] les les vidanges, il faudra payer le vidangeur,
l'eau, il faudra payer. La ville, c'est
[58:33] des autres dépenses. Je vous écoute. On va
arriver à votre question, là, c'est à quel
taux
[58:38] vous empruntez? Sur combien d'années? Et ça
va tomber combien sur nos impôts, là?
[58:46] Parce que déjà, les deux dernières années,
ça a augmenté, la mienne a augmenté. 1000
et
[58:55] quelque chose. Donc, ça va avoir un effet
sur les impôts sur le long terme, là. Combien
[59:02] d'années que vous allez bien, c'est ça? Oui,
effectivement, quand on emprunte, il faut
[59:09] repayer l'emprunt et les intérêts, à défaut
de faire ça, on va affecter nos impôts
[59:16] directement. Mais oui, et comme les emprunts
qui ont été contractés il y a 20 ans, 25
[59:22] ans, quinze ans, dix ans l'an dernier, vous
empruntez plus que ce que le revenu là, donc
[59:30] plus ou moins là. C'est ce que je vois, c'est
que c'est exagéré. Si votre question est
[59:38] est ce que est ce qu'il va? Est ce que votre
question est, est ce qu'il va y avoir un impact?
[59:43] Est ce qu'on doit payer? Oui. Quelqu'un a étudié
l'impact que ça va avoir sur le long terme?
[59:47] Oui et there is a question from Mr Duncan.
Spécifiquement en lien avec l'emprunt du Centre
[59:56] culturel. Et l'exercice doit être fait effectivement
ou a été fait en fait. Oui, Okay
[1:00:05] merci merci. Dernière question Goodevening
This is for one, one one saint Andrew, We're
[1:00:15] gonna we're gonna have it time to go to one
one one when we get to the winter really sorry.
[1:00:22] I'm sorry. I just so you don't want me to hear
my question. Now is that what you're saying?
[1:00:30] Okay, okay okay. You'll be our last question
of the evening. Good evening. Sweet right for
[1:00:46] years. Yes, I'm gonna question. You've got
the twenty 7 millions that you have given to
[1:00:54] the contract in Dorval. Did anyone else caught
on that? Yes, sir. Yes, the question is in
[1:01:05] the last budget you. There is all family and
the world allocated to remove the of the
[1:01:17] place of the the old yes Club-House club house
is the part of that contract. Yes, sir.
[1:01:27] So it be twenty-seven, it'll be less and twenty-seven
millions, including the demolition of the
[1:01:35] club-house, Yes and to and to add to your to
my answer to your first question. WE had
[1:01:43] received twelve beads for this contract, which
is phenomenal and the first six beaters the
[1:01:53] first six company providing the price. We're
all within I don't remember three point five
or.
[1:02:03] About four five of the lowest confirming better.
So not only did we get a lot of beads.
[1:02:10] There were very competitive with one another
good. Thank you. Thank you very much. Okay.
[1:02:23] I would just gonna come on what you know about
the boss and roses. Period we started
[1:02:32] question period with you. I was just gonna
say that. Why are you going away? The two from
[1:02:39] bordeaux-lac and putting roses. Why did you
just get a new bus and put it on why you take
away
[1:02:46] the two eleven. You're not doing anything.
The stm is why cstm. Why is the STM taking
[1:02:54] away. The two eleven, which is served me and
plenty of other people, so that the track and
[1:02:59] the north of the track and all starting on
mount roads, which is going to take me twenty
[1:03:04] minutes where to walk to from saint Andrew.
Why don't you take it with the STM create a
[1:03:11] new bus and put that on elm. I map out of route
on and that would work starting from And
[1:03:17] why does it not go from? Where to gare doesn't
connect with the gare. This was delivered to
[1:03:24] the the McDonald campus. That you have are
for the STM. And why did they choose the two
[1:03:35] eleven and renamed the route to go to a different
place. I do not know that they're doing.
[1:03:42] Madame Godin. Nicole is going to offer to sit
down and maps out the roots wherever you want
[1:03:51] to start and end together. WE can do that after
the meeting and we can use the simulators
[1:03:56] to see exactly where you need to go and what
the change you would like for you. OK, merci.
[1:04:03] Thank you. Given the time and the extended
period that we've used for the present question.
[1:04:24] Those who are not in attendance and that have
provided questions for me to read and
[1:04:30] answers, you'll receive answers through the
administration within the next week or so will
[1:04:39] will you? But just not tonight and right now.
Thank you. So item ten point one.
[1:04:55] L'approbation du procès-verbal de la séance
extraordinaire du Conseil de la ville de
[1:04:59] Beaconsfield du 19 janvier 20 26 à 10 9 h.
Je propose juste secondes en faveur. Item ten
[1:05:11] point to point two of the city of Beaconsfield
special Council from January Twenty twenty
six
[1:05:19] bpm. I proposed all in favor. Item 10.3 L'approbation
du procès-verbal de la séance
[1:05:30] extraordinaire du Conseil de la ville de Beaconsfield
du 22 janvier 2026 à 8 h 15. Je
[1:05:38] propose. Je seconde en faveur. Idem of the
city of Beaconsfield. Published
[1:05:48] consultation Twenty twenty six. Propose. Approbation
du procès-verbal de la séance
[1:06:02] ordinaire du Conseil de la ville de Beaconsfield
du 26 janvier 20 26 à 10 7 h 30. Je
[1:06:08] propose. Idem Twenty point un. Of the contract
with start that over there, we go people at
[1:06:23] home can hear so twenty one is the ritual of
the contract TP twenty twenty five of five
for
[1:06:29] the maintenance and repair of our hvac. Système
de ventilation heating and cooling
[1:06:34] invisible building for the year of twenty twenty
six with Navy refuge Réfrigération, inc.
[1:06:41] Adding Approximate cost of twenty-two thousand
two hundred and two and twenty-two all
[1:06:46] taxes included proposed a second. Item twenty
item 20.2 Ratification de l'octroi du
[1:06:57] contrat d'assurance. Dommages de la ville de
Beaconsfield pour la période du 1eʳ janvier
[1:07:01] au 31 décembre. 20 26 Autorisation du paiement
de la prime Société d'assurance
[1:07:08] Bénévent incorporée pour un montant total
de quatre 20 798 et 43, toutes taxes incluses.
[1:07:15] Suite à l'appel d'offres réalisé par l'Union
des municipalités du Québec, l'UMQ,
[1:07:21] dans le cadre de Regroupement des municipalités
de l'île de Montréal, le RM i m, je propose,
[1:07:29] je. Seconde en faveur. Item twenty point three
contract twenty five GC for the
[1:07:41] construction of a multipurpose cultural center
of the city of Beaconsfield to three access
[1:07:47] construction, inc. For the amount of twenty-seven
millions thousand dollars thousand
[1:07:54] dollars taxes included in purpose. Item 20.4.
Je propose résolution autorisant une
[1:08:15] dépense et la signature d'une entente avec
le ministère de la Culture et des Communications.
[1:08:22] Emcc pour l'intégration d'une œuvre d'art
dans le cadre du projet Centre culturel
[1:08:30] multifonctionnel de Beaconsfield. Je seconde
alors. Il s'agit d'une dépense
[1:08:37] maximale de 143 730 $, qui est une obligation
qui découle de la subvention que le ministère
[1:08:45] nous a octroyé pour la construction du Centre
culturel, Alors, en faveur. Item twenty
[1:08:55] point of this is the mandate of the Union des
municipalités du Québec with regard to the
group
[1:09:00] for purchasing common of insurance products
relating to the protection of reputation of
[1:09:04] Elected Officials Senior officers against Defamation
harassment and hate speech as
[1:09:10] well as criminal, Liability insurance and matter
of Occupational Health and safety
[1:09:17] Safety I propose. Item 30.1. Je propose l'approbation
de la liste des comptes à payer au 23
[1:09:30] février 2026 et de la liste des paiements
préautorisés pour la période du 16 janvier
2026 au
[1:09:38] 25 janvier 2026 et du 27 janvier 2026 au 12
février 2026, pour un déboursé total de
[1:09:49] 2 752 447 $ et douze cents. And so this month,
it's relatively small amount if we compare
it
[1:09:55] to next month when we come back and we have
the agglo portion of our payment will be closer
[1:10:03] to twenty twenty five million dollar. Les dépenses
principales qui sont couvertes
[1:10:10] par ce dépôt sont une somme de 166 881 $
à Construction Matos Inc. Pour des travaux
de
[1:10:21] construction de la capitainerie sur le site
de la Marina Centennial et 367 432 $ et 25
[1:10:30] ans. Paiements d'intérêts sur la dette à
long terme, tel que nous l'avons prévu au
budget
[1:10:34] adopté le mois dernier, et ce qui vaut la
peine d'être mentionné, les autres montants
[1:10:42] sont plus petits. Item item thirty point two.
Merci. Merci. So all in favor. First of all.
[1:10:55] Secondary and then we both all in favor. Here
we go. We'll get it right. Thank you. Merci.
IDM
[1:11:02] Thirty point two. Approbation d'un appui financier
de 2 000 $ à la Bourse commémorative Topps
[1:11:09] pour l'année 20 26. Je propose. J'appuie en
faveur. Item 30.3 Approbation d'une contribution
[1:11:23] financière de 300 $ et 51 à 13 Associations
communautaires, culturelles et sportives
[1:11:30] représentant jusqu'à 50 % des frais de base
de la prime d'assurance responsabilité de
[1:11:36] BFL pour l'année 20 26. Je propose. Un sac
en faveur. Merci. Item Point fort. La
[1:11:53] participation Annual Conference of the l'Union
des municipalités du Québec, l'UMQ
[1:12:00] from the Thirteenth, Twenty Twenty six and
Quebec City and approximate cost of
[1:12:07] reimbursement of traveling expenses and other
related cost secondary. Five. Donc item 30.5.
[1:12:22] C'est un autre congrès, donc participation
du maire au congrès annuel de la Fédération
[1:12:27] canadienne des municipalités FCM. Autrement
dit, du 4 au 7 juin 2026, Edmonton, Alberta,
[1:12:33] au coût approximatif d'un 1 195 $ plus remboursement
des remboursements des frais de
[1:12:40] transport, de logement et d'autres dépenses
afférentes proposées. Je seconde en faveur.
[1:12:53] 8.6. Participation of the Director General
of the Annual Conference of the Union des
[1:13:00] municipalités du Québec. From Thirteenth
to fifteen twenty twenty six in Quebec city
and
[1:13:05] the approximate cost of eight hundred knight
dollars plus reimbursement of traveling and
[1:13:09] lodging expenses and other related costs. Y
propose. Item 30.7. Je propose la
[1:13:24] participation du Directeur général au congrès
annuel de l'Association des directeurs
[1:13:28] généraux des municipalités du Québec à
des gmq, du 10 au 12 juin 2026 à Saint-Hyacinthe,
au
[1:13:38] coût approximatif de 930 $ plus remboursement
des frais de transport, de logement et
[1:13:43] d'autres dépenses afférentes. Jeffery en
faveur. De directeur General and the Annual
[1:13:58] Conference of the Canadian Association of Municipal
Administrator. Cvma from my
[1:14:04] twenty-fifth to Twenty-seven Twenty Twenty
six in Whistler, British Columbia and the cost
[1:14:10] of seven hundred and seven dollars plus reimbursement
of traveling and lodging expenses
[1:14:14] and other related costs. Réglementation Item
40.1. Oui, je donne un avis de motion pour
[1:14:31] le dépôt. Avis de motion et adoption du premier
projet de règlement 720 131 intitulé
[1:14:38] Règlement modifiant le règlement de zonage
720 Afin de modifier le nombre de matériaux
[1:14:44] de revêtement pour les bâtiments Multifamiliaux
H3 d'ajouter des normes
[1:14:50] spécifiques à la zone H336 Concernant le
pour centage de pente d'allée d'accès au
[1:14:57] stationnement et de modifier les normes concernant
les usages Multifamiliales, H3 et
[1:15:03] habitations communautaires H4 pour la zone
H336, afin de les rendre conformes au plan
[1:15:10] d'urbanisme de la ville de Beaconsfield et
soumission du premier projet de règlement
à
[1:15:16] une consultation publique, le 23 mars 20 26
à 10 9 h. J'appuie en faveur. Idem for
[1:15:28] the point two. Son avis du motion. Feeling
of motion. Adoption of draft. Bylaw. Big
[1:15:34] one. Sixty five. That's one. Entitled. Bella
bella by one sixty five concerning the
[1:15:40] planning program to specify the maximum number
of stories permitted inside the sector to
[1:15:45] be transformed or built by one and add a one
sector to be transformed or built in five
[1:15:52] and the planning program of the city of Beaconsfield
and submission of the draft below
[1:15:56] to the public consultation on march twenty
twenty twenty Seven PM I propose. Items 40,3
[1:16:11] Dépôt et avis de motion de projets de règlement
177 intitulé Règlement autorisant
[1:16:17] des dépôts des dépenses en immobilisations,
immobilisations et un emprunt
[1:16:22] de 1 000 405 $ 405 0 $ pour la réhabilitation.
Réhabilitation structurant, structurant de
[1:16:34] conduites adéquates et d'égouts sanitaires.
Je propose n'est qu'un avis de motion. Merci,
[1:16:42] Madame. Items 40.4. Avis de motion Feeling
of motion of draft. Bylaw. Big one. Seven
[1:16:52] below to authorize capital. Expenditure in
the land of two hundred. Dollars reconfigure
[1:17:00] the Woodlands and highway twenty intersections.
Merci. Thank you. Items Forty five.
[1:17:07] C'est un autre avis de motion dépôt et avis
de motion du projet de règlement By 179
[1:17:13] intitulé Règlement autorisant des dépenses
en immobilisations et un emprunt de 1 200 000
pour
[1:17:21] divers travaux et études pour l'amélioration
du réseau du réseau. Je m'excuse. D'Égout
[1:17:28] pluvial. Merci. Merci. Item point six. I give
notice of motion for the feeling and
[1:17:37] notice of motion of draft. Bylaw. By entitled
to authorize capital expenditure and a lot
[1:17:45] of two million five hundred thousand dollars
for the replacement of mechanical unit
[1:17:49] at the public works building in the municipal
garage. Merci. Item 40.7 Je donne un avis.
Je
[1:18:00] donne un avis de motion pour le dépôt et
avis de motion du projet de règlement By 181
[1:18:06] intitulé Règlement autorisant l'emprunt de
18 000 18 600 000 $ pour la
[1:18:14] construction d'un centre culturel multifonctionnel
avant subventions et contributions
[1:18:19] privées. Merci. Alors, nous allons procéder.
WE will have two Idem date pertaining to
[1:18:30] demolition review of the decision of the demolition
committee. The first one is for
[1:18:37] the building on Beaconsfield Boulevard. Date
trois Thirty six If you want to go to the
[1:18:46] microphone. Bien. Bonjour. Bonjour. Merci pour
l'écoute. Tantôt, on avait fait bref de
[1:18:56] poser la question dans le fond de voir à la
révision qui a été mise en place le 2 décembre.
[1:19:04] Approchez vous un peu du micro s'il vous plaît.
Je me présente, je suis Francis Roy, je suis
[1:19:09] représentant, J'accompagne M. Angelo, propriétaire
du 366 à Nice. To meet you and the
[1:19:19] committee on the good work and the esprit de
Noël. Here tonight at the very onset of
[1:19:27] our meeting. But I guess the question for me.
This evening is this an opportunity for me
[1:19:34] to defend the position that was taken in respect
to the request for the demolition of three
six
[1:19:43] six. I can tell you that we've we have the
file. WE have what you've provided. It's been
[1:19:49] provided to every member of the council. Is
there is something specific that would like
to
[1:19:55] address or stress this evening, we. Juste de
revoir, donc rapprochez vous du micro. C'est
[1:20:04] bon. Ayez pas peur, c'est rare. Je m'entend
dans une micro. Le point est qu'on essayait
de
[1:20:09] revoir s'assurer que les conseillers avait
bien vu. Bon du départ, on voyait pas comme
[1:20:17] étant une demande de démolition par la suite
pour se rendre compte qu'un pour centage de
[1:20:24] rénovation sur la demeure, vu certains points
qu'on a statué dans le dossier, euh portait
à
[1:20:31] croire qu'on dépassait largement le côté
raisonnable d'imputer des frais de
[1:20:39] rénovation puis d'avancer là dedans. Le point
était dans ma question que j'aurais pu poser
[1:20:43] tantôt pour être assez bref, est ce que le
Conseil aurait besoin, avec ce qu'on a renvoyé,
[1:20:51] vu qu'on a demandé un appel à, de retourner
dans le dossier de la firme Gris Orange qui
a été
[1:20:58] mandaté par la ville de Beaconsfield, d'amener
des précisions à un point, parce
[1:21:03] qu'on voit ici que c'est pas une prospection,
mais il y a un point qui est réellement
[1:21:09] monétaire qu'on essaie d'amener à voir. Il
y a trois, trois point qui était le côté
[1:21:15] historique qui a été mis de côté, mais
qui a été vu comme typiquement une demeure
[1:21:21] québécoise, comme beaucoup de maisons dans
le coin de 1960 à 1980, il y a plusieurs points
[1:21:29] qu'on essayait d'apporter pour assurer que
le Conseil aille bien, pris conscience que
[1:21:36] c'était pas juste un coup de dé puis qu'on
arrivait à ces points là aujourd'hui pour
[1:21:40] qu'on puisse arriver à un vote de vote par
le Conseil puis qu'il soit réfléchi. On a
vu
[1:21:48] qu'il était rentré par rapport au conseil
de février 1 point, qu'il y avait un manquement
[1:21:55] d'incohérence dans la discussion. C'était
même pas le point qu'on voulait amener. On
[1:22:01] comprend bien que c'est pas ça que vous vouliez
dire, mais que c'était un point qu'on voulait
[1:22:06] céder, point qu'on voulait amener, qui était
selon nous irraisonnable de pouvoir
[1:22:13] arriver avec une valeur de la maison détériorée,
qui se détériore avec les années. Puis,
[1:22:21] puisque mon client est arrivé à voir, à
faire une rénovation sur un immeuble qui présentait
[1:22:27] pas les qualifications pour que je puisse arriver
et donner une valeur. Parce qu'on va
[1:22:36] comprendre que ça se peut que ça soit la
dernière décembre, le dire. Alors, comme
je vous
[1:22:41] dis, on a pris connaissance de l'ensemble du
dossier. Peut être que, pour répondre à
votre
[1:22:49] question, si quelqu'un autour de la table a
une question pour vous, ben je vais laisser
la
[1:22:55] parole aux conseillers qui voudraient vous
poser des questions. Mais je pense que ce
[1:23:01] que nous avons reçu était. Bien, disait,
disait ce que ça devait dire. Oui, de mon
point de vue
[1:23:09] à tout le moins. Okay, alors euh, pas de question.
Merci pour votre intervention. Est ce
[1:23:18] que pour le lancer en appel, comment que ça
va statuer? On va recevoir, On va on va le
[1:23:24] voter là, à vous voter ce soir? Oui. Ah ok.
Oui oui oui OK. Merci merci merci merci. Alors,
[1:23:33] madame. Madame Godin Oui, euh, Demande de révision
de la décision du Comité de
[1:23:41] démolition du 2 décembre 2025 concernant
le bâtiment situé au 306 Beaconsfield, vous
proposez.
[1:23:48] Je propose que la demande soit refusée, la
demande, soit la demande de révision, soit
[1:23:56] refusée. D'accord. Est ce qu'il y a quelqu'un
qui seconde? Motion. Pardon. Merci. Alors
[1:24:07] qui? Quels sont ceux qui sont en faveur du
maintien? Oh no no no no, it's ok. I just want
to
[1:24:15] make sure. I am I'm going properly because
you will help us out. Or comme after the vote
[1:24:20] if you don't mind before you, absolutely okay.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for
[1:24:26] bringing it up because I was just going to
move on and it's been it's been an interesting
[1:24:30] evening. Yes. But afterwards make sure I'm
voting properly cause I want to make sure I
[1:24:37] understand the motion. OK? So first, thank
you for the opportunity to speak this
[1:24:41] evening on this file. And and let me be saying,
you know our role on council is not always
[1:24:51] agree. WE need to take a look at whatever the
item is on the agenda, you know and where
[1:24:56] necessary debate challenges each other respectfully
and then vote how we believe is
[1:25:03] right and and whether we're right are wrong.
Well, we gotta votes how we believe is right
[1:25:09] and in the interest of in this case the hormones,
but also in my opinion in the case of the
[1:25:17] public interest. Okay? So I look at this file
in two big budget the property owner and
[1:25:24] what's in the public interest and we saw earlier
this evening during the public consultation
[1:25:31] that we're we're modifying our bylaw on sanitation
occupancy and maintenance of buildings as
[1:25:38] it applied to whether it's a building or are
just somebody's home right. We're ensuring
that
[1:25:45] there are standards that preserves and sustained
the building and set minimal
[1:25:52] conditions for for living. You know we are
trying to protect what we have right. If not
it
[1:26:02] be a little bit too easy to just wink wink
Nudge nudge leave the Windows open, let the
[1:26:08] water run and perhaps have a home fall into
this repair kit quickly. WE don't want that
to
[1:26:14] happen in Beaconsfield, Okay, but with that
in mind when does the imposition of conserving
[1:26:23] the building become two great of and ask, okay,
so when is saying dear home owners, you
[1:26:32] must conserve repair Refurbished your home.
No you're not allowed to demolish
[1:26:38] it when does that become two great of and ask
and when I look at this file. It was built
[1:26:46] in nineteen fifty nine on a nice size lot thousand
square feet if I converted to fit
[1:26:52] properly and when you look at the value of
the home. So here we are talking about valeurs
[1:26:59] foncières and the Montreal website and you
can see the value of the property, the
[1:27:05] actual building, the house itself has a value
of one hundred and thousand six
[1:27:12] hundred dollars on a total value of one point,
almost two million dollars. So the value
[1:27:18] in this property is not the house. It's the
land. But when we look at the report. Yes,
two
[1:27:30] correct. Yeah. One point, one line zero to
be Exact. So you think thank you one point
two
[1:27:37] millions is a little short of one point two
million. Okay, so and when we look at the reasons
[1:27:44] for our initially. Declining or refusing the
demolition request it was on the good state
and
[1:27:53] estimated reasonable cost of repairing the
home bringing it back up to snuff, not expanding
[1:27:59] not hiding on note making it a while fixing
it the end and we have three different coats
when
[1:28:08] provided by our our engineer from the city
and to provide the far away from the from the
[1:28:14] owner, the coat to fix the houses are between
five hundred and twenty five thousand to
[1:28:21] five hundred and sixty thousands of renovations
on a house, that's worth a hundred
[1:28:28] thousand six hundred to me that does not make
sense to me. I'm always speaking for myself
here
[1:28:36] that does not make sense to me. That's two
great of the financial. Ask in this case and
[1:28:44] when we look at the report, saying that it's
a good state. Okay foundation problem roof
[1:28:53] problème Lack of installation pour drainage
Windows Cladding Stone Electrical The star
[1:29:01] smokes. I mean I guess it's really what's in
good state or not okay? So I look at that and
[1:29:08] I say when I'm looking at the home owners.
This is so great of an imposition when I think
[1:29:15] now of the public interest and I want to be
clear again that I'm speaking for myself. If
we
[1:29:23] are to refuse this demolition with this home
and this condition with that financial
[1:29:30] burden start thinking of everybody else at
home around Beaconsfield, start thinking of
[1:29:36] our propertyvalue start thinking of people
that want to buy our home invest in
[1:29:41] Beaconsfield and bring their money to our city.
We're all you got one thing going for us
[1:29:47] and beaconsfield about the great people and
us. WE don't have industry. WE don't have
[1:29:52] commercial. WE are a real estate business here
in Beaconsfield. It's about the
[1:29:57] home and so myself as a counselor when I think
of the public interest. So forget the
[1:30:03] residents. I see this as in the public interest
to allow this to go forward for what it means
[1:30:10] and the broader scope of all home owners and
I happen to be the share of the finance
[1:30:16] committee have also and it means for our city
from the financial perspective. So thank
[1:30:21] you for allow me to speak and I'll leave it
at that you are welcome anybody else. Now,
I
[1:30:31] was just going to like I appreciate counselor,
you know opinion, etc. There are more
[1:30:38] than just one criteria that the committee review
is there are over thirteen of them. So one
[1:30:45] of them is the one that you've brought up,
but there are others also in terms of the
[1:30:49] state of the amovible, and the one that brings
to the character of the area, its
[1:30:55] architecture, etc. So there is not just the
one element to look at so it's like a global
[1:31:00] global thing. Is there any one else that would
like to add to this, Non that my. Let me leamy
[1:31:14] think that we so it's proposed the second.
It's commented. WE can vote so I'm going to
work
[1:31:23] it this way. All those in favor of improving
the review process and overturn the committee
[1:31:33] decision to refuse the demolition demolition
allowing the demolition Yes, so all in
[1:31:40] favour of that so I have three and presumably
all those in favour of maintaining the
[1:31:50] committee decisions and refusing the demolition
and we have three. So it is a type of
[1:31:59] youth and as a result the request for the views
of demolition committee, did not
[1:32:06] receive the number of votes. Idem for the point
nine. It means that the decision to
[1:32:18] refused. The demolition is maintained. Idem
for the point nine. La demande de révision
de
[1:32:34] la décision du comité de démolition du 2
décembre 2025 concernant le bâtiment situé
au
[1:32:39] un un un saint Andrew. Est ce que j'ai quelqu'un
qui qui appuie ici cette personne? Oui,
[1:32:50] c'est That's okay. Good evening and counselors
spoken to Dominique about this already.
[1:32:58] I'm a residents of saint Andrew. I leave at
one saint Andrew and I've been there for two
years
[1:33:04] and on the left side of me house went up on
the right side of me a house went up. There
[1:33:11] are cookie-cutter of each other. The same individual
has both one and one eleven saint Andrew
[1:33:16] is going to be putting up another house exactly
the same and there's a house that looks
[1:33:22] exactly the same and if I had wanted to leave
in the development. I would have moved
[1:33:27] to Vaudreuil, not Beaconsfield and Beaconsfield.
I think has a lot of charming older homes.
[1:33:32] Some of them are are in need of repair and
absolutely understand that excuse me, but
[1:33:38] I feel like and I've spoken Dominique at l'anact
about this that that perhaps and I can't
[1:33:46] have a say and whether you know this demolition
goes ahead. However, I felt that and I did
[1:33:50] a bit of assessment and I understand that when
it is given to an owners to take down
[1:33:57] the house, the things are considered such as
the building conditions the potential for
[1:34:04] renovation and the neighborhood caractère
and I feel good to have for identical houses
[1:34:10] within the Stones. Straw is going to die tract
from the character of the neighborhood,
[1:34:14] and I know that and I find that found this
out and I know it wasn't beaconsfield decisions,
[1:34:19] but certain neighborhood are given some kind
of special designation and it but our
[1:34:23] street doesn't happen to be one of them sadly
and probably a lot of those home where we were
[1:34:28] summer cottages at some point and just go out
and to but my house is and it was built in
[1:34:34] fifty-five. So I feel that perhaps I may not
have the same as I said in stopping this and
[1:34:40] and and but I would like to know given that
I believe the planning commission has some
[1:34:47] role in saying what kind of house is built
where and when what role that they will take
[1:34:52] moving forward given that I'm not the only
person that addicted to this demolition,
[1:34:57] they were five of us on this street for very
same reason. So that's kind of like my point
[1:35:01] and that I wanted to have to be addressed.
Thank you. Thank you for your right. You know
the
[1:35:10] following process after a demolition is obviously
for for the house to be to be built.
[1:35:18] However, as part of the demolition process
beyond the nature of what is going to be
[1:35:25] built meaning. Here we are we going to be allowing
or are we discussing a residential home
[1:35:34] single family dwelling? Is it gonna be the
same type of usage for the next building. At
this
[1:35:43] level that we're at right now. The demolition
committee is not its not one of the criterion.
[1:35:49] You know what the house may or may not look
like afterwards once its it's built to replace
[1:35:56] the one that being being demolished having
said that my colleague counselors null is
[1:36:03] the shards of the public Advisory Committee
review the buildings that are being
[1:36:10] proposed suggested to council for approach
to be built. La conseillère Godin Would you
[1:36:17] been speaking clearly is also very much interested
in in the public advisory committee works.
[1:36:26] She is substitute member and feeling when counselor
null is absent. So that something that
[1:36:37] you know is is not yet determined or definite
far from it. Yep familiar with the
[1:36:46] procedure so if there's been five objections
to the demolitions. It went ahead
[1:36:51] anyway, so now what is the role of the planning
committee in terms of the kind of structure
[1:36:56] that would be built on that spot so the planning
committee is to its mandate and there are
[1:37:04] residences on that committee, its mandate is
to make recommendations to council on
[1:37:11] building or projects that in their evaluation.
I'll see it bluntly feets in and sometimes
[1:37:21] you know, it doesn't it takes more than one
kick at the go before the project gets
[1:37:28] favorably recommended to the council and approved
here, so that's really how it's it.
[1:37:34] That's the next process wants and if the property
in question is being demolished questions.
[1:37:44] Are there are there guidelines or regulations
regarding this process that I could consult,
[1:37:52] unless it's a specific and perhaps counselor
annual you can help me out, but unless
[1:37:57] it's a specific character area. There is a
general category that would apply. Head. First
[1:38:08] off the demolition and the new building completely
separate, they don't overlaps completely
[1:38:14] independent decision to that whatsoever so
if you look at the full life will have a home
[1:38:19] is demolished eventually there usually a new
one that is that wants to go up in its place,
so
[1:38:24] that separate process and it's mostly information
on there. I believe the criteria. There is
[1:38:28] well, I'm not mistaken. It's been a while since
I looked at them on the website. You see
[1:38:32] them every month, but but there there and it's
essentially the for the most of the same
[1:38:38] criteria that every municipality use these
are really driven by the provincial
[1:38:42] government and the criteria, but what about
that is that we also interpret it all these
[1:38:46] criteria locally and then the see you for example,
not only are the couple members of her
[1:38:52] and planning, but there are actually expanded,
but we have seven members of Beaconsfield
[1:38:57] residents that are also involved in that for
various parts of the city who are also
[1:39:01] the best of make up the composition of that
I know that wasn't your specific question.
[1:39:05] But you give you a fuel for the approach that
used in that, and so I think. Mentioned to
it one
[1:39:12] of the criteria integration and so on the looking
for integration. We're not looking
[1:39:15] at just doing the cookie-cutter approach and
necessarily. It could be different style of
[1:39:19] bring for about what's great in the area and
is probably one of the challenges. WE have
and be
[1:39:24] used when one, that's when that comes through
to make sure to do our very best to try and
[1:39:28] find something great work that can mean a lot
of different things to different people.
[1:39:32] However, we so we will we try to take it. That's
all we have so many residents actually on
[1:39:38] that committees as well and who are trying
to do that by the way, it is required that
they
[1:39:43] have training on this at the same time, so
anyway without going further on it. It's a
[1:39:47] process and there is a company that we meet
once a month. We're going to go through the
[1:39:51] number of this project as an example of the
output of some of those meetings, and it will
[1:39:56] be part of your consideration to what the I
responded to the announcement that demolition
[1:40:05] was was given, and then I was informed that
it may go to your committee. The planning
[1:40:12] committee is now, I'm not try to ensure that
it. Went to this way and if I'm not being clear
[1:40:20] demolition tonight. This is. Just the demolition
whatever happens after that are the new
[1:40:27] building, completely independent. It is nothing
about this next point on the
[1:40:30] agenda. For example, you know so if you know
what if and when whatever happens with the
[1:40:39] demolition or what not even if it for example,
even if the demolition didn't happen and
[1:40:45] somebody renovated the building put in addition
on it was still comes to the the planning
[1:40:50] advisory committee to to look at how does that
hope project integrated? So what so forth
[1:40:54] the same thing if if the demolition goes through
and a new home is built it will be
[1:40:59] the same approach to the site. You are the
reason. I just want to add so the demolition
[1:41:08] committee made the decision some time ago and
tonight that decisions based on the request
[1:41:15] that we received. So that's what's happening
tonight? OK, ok, and then after that it's
[1:41:19] the it goes to the ok. I agree with everything
she said I love and I already said I leave
on
[1:41:33] the hundred and third saint Andrew, So I I
moved from Toronto from Scarborough
[1:41:41] actually to Beaconsfield, three years ago and
Scarborough Beaconsfield is going to look
[1:41:48] like Scarborough after all these demolitions
and rebuild with cookie-cutter house. With
[1:41:57] completely. Please, please say no to this demolition
at the house. That's right now is
[1:42:04] absolutely beautiful and think it will be really
nice if it could be restored, you know I
[1:42:09] hope somebody. Else buy it. Restore it to its
its. Original et original condition because
[1:42:19] that would be so much better than turning that
beautiful house and the garbage corrado.
[1:42:28] OK for the point, so all in favor of maintaining
the decision of the demolition
[1:42:37] committee. To allow the demolition, that's
the decision of the demolition to meet you
[1:42:44] all in favor. It's ok. Thank you. OK. Item
forty five points one. OK. So now we're going
to
[1:42:57] urban planning project. Donc, cher conseil
de la part de la Sécu et le comité consultatif
[1:43:05] d'urbanisme, je propose que vous accepteriez
leur recommandation d'approbation
[1:43:09] pour les items suivants de 45.1 à 45.9. So
the council on Behalf of the Advisory
[1:43:15] committee and proposing that the council accept
the recommendations to approuve
[1:43:20] items forty five points one two forty five
points nine. Specifically the item are forty
[1:43:28] five one, the request for a minor exemption
for the property located at one
[1:43:33] fourteen regions also. Un Demande d'approbation
du plan d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:43:39] architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis
de construction pour
[1:43:42] l'agrandissement du bâtiment principal, situé
au trois logos selon option C. Et ça, ça
veut
[1:43:47] dire du BRIC item fifty forty five points three
excuse me. This is a request for approval
[1:43:55] of again planning and architectural integration
programs relating to the
[1:43:59] building permits application for the extension
of the building located at the one
[1:44:04] region again for approval. 45.4 Demande d'approbation
du plan d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:44:12] architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis
de construction pour
[1:44:15] l'agrandissement du bâtiment principal situé
à 24 Saint Louis. Forty Five Points Five
[1:44:21] request for approval for the side planning
and architectural integration programs relating
[1:44:25] to the building permis application for the
extension of the building located at
[1:44:29] twenty six Manresa Marissa. 45.6 Demande d'approbation
pour Plan d'implantation et
[1:44:37] d'intégration architecturale relatif à la
demande d'un permis de construction pour
[1:44:41] l'agrandissement du bâtiment principal situé
à trois, trois, neuf Berwick Forty five points
[1:44:47] Seven his request for approval of the sight
planning and architectural integration
[1:44:51] programs related building permits application
for the modification of the sad of the
[1:44:56] building located at one sixty Juniper. 45.8
Demande d'approbation pour un plan
[1:45:03] d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale
relatif à la demande d'un permis de
[1:45:07] construction pour la modification d'un façade
du bâtiment principal situé à 280
[1:45:14] 96 Pine Tree. Finalement. 45.9 Request for
the approval of the sight planning and
[1:45:21] architectural integration programs related
to the building permits application to
[1:45:25] modify the already approved plans at five one
Beaconsfield so again. Dixième forty five
[1:45:34] point one to forty five points Nine arts request
in your approval of someone to. All and
[1:45:43] favour. Merci. Thank you. Donc la prochaine
groupe, c'est à dire de 45.1 à 45.4.
[1:45:53] Excusez-moi. 45 Pardon 45.10 45.14. So the
following item de la part de. Encore une fois,
de
[1:46:04] la part du Comité consultatif d'urbanisme.
Je propose que vous accepteriez leur
[1:46:10] recommandation de refus pour les items. 45.1
point 10 à 45 quatorze Selon The Planning
[1:46:17] Advisory Committee and Proposing the Council
Accept the recommendations to refuse
[1:46:21] the following item from forty five point one
zéro forty five point ten rather to fourteen,
[1:46:30] so this refers to the following following address.
Un demande d'approbation sur 45.10 Demande
[1:46:41] d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration
architecturale relatif à la
[1:46:44] demande d'un permis de construction pour l'agrandissement
du bâtiment
[1:46:47] principal, situé à 41 Circle Forty Five Point
Eleven, The request for the sight planning
[1:46:52] and Architectural integration planning program
relating to the building permits
[1:46:57] application for the modification of the façades
and building located at forty five
[1:47:01] sweet Briar moving on to the point three. Un
dépôt. Excuse moi. Oui. Bon. 45.12 C'est
pour
[1:47:15] une demande d'approbation du plan d'implantation
et d'intégration architecturale
[1:47:19] relatif à la demande de permis de construction
pour la modification d'un plan déjà
[1:47:24] approuvé au 185 Lake View. Ensuite, 40 Forty
five point One tree. This is the request
[1:47:32] for approval for the sight planning and actual
integration programs to carry out back
[1:47:36] filling work at the property located at one
in five lake view and finally. Finalement.
[1:47:43] 45.14 Une demande d'approbation du plan d'implantation
et d'intégration architecturale
[1:47:48] relatif à une réalisation des travaux de
remblai de remblai sur la propriété située
au 301
[1:47:55] London. Donc, en résumant les To resume the
project forty five points to forty five for
[1:48:03] in our for refusal and for council votes on
that I50. Thank you. Merci. Item fifty
[1:48:16] point one for the nominations in view of Permanently
as Chef de section Projets to position
[1:48:24] fifty one hundred and proposed 50. Item 50.2
Nomination en vue de permanence à titre d'agent
[1:48:36] au service à la clientèle et à la réception.
Au poste de 2111, je propose. Je. Seconde en
[1:48:44] faveur. Merci. Fifty point Three propose The
view of pregnancy as. Technicien en
[1:48:54] génie civil et inspecteur Two position One
zéro six. Fifth point One 51 53.1 sur Fifty
[1:49:10] Three point un. Processus. Processus verbal
de la réunion du Comité consultatif
[1:49:16] d'urbanisme du 3 février 2026. Donc, I don't
have a lot of other comments. WE just went
[1:49:22] through all those projects that took place
at that particular meeting, but forward looking
at
[1:49:26] mention. Donc, je voulais juste mentionner
que la prochaine réunion qui va avoir lieu
pour
[1:49:30] le le six, le Next Meeting for the Planning
Advisory Committee will be on the third the
[1:49:36] deadline espace obviously is for those projects
being seen, you would have already
[1:49:40] submitted your plan, so. But just as a general
comment I think this is also getting to
[1:49:46] be of the very busy time of the year when the
spring approach of people do have project.
[1:49:50] You're definitely good to get them into the
C.C.W for March and April. It does get it.
So
[1:49:56] sometimes these things can take to review given
the volume of the project, so if you like
[1:50:02] something be reviewed by now is the time if
not already starting dose project to have a
[1:50:07] look at that and discuss them with the urban
planning department for for submission.
[1:50:15] So proposed. Fifty three two and proposing
many of the advisory committee meeting of
[1:50:26] December, twenty twenty five. Or not particularly,
except residences by now, we will have
[1:50:37] all received in the mail. No contact. So there
you go. Yes, thank you. Fifty 3.3. Le dépôt
[1:50:51] du procès-verbal de la séance du comité
de démolition du 17 février, pour préciser
un
[1:50:58] énoncé du procès-verbal de la séance du
2 décembre. C'est une correction de texte.
Six point
[1:51:07] One. Mandat à l'administration de la ville
de Beaconsfield de payer le premier versement
des
[1:51:14] quotes-parts, des factures et des contributions
pour l'année 20 26 à l'agglomération de
[1:51:20] Montréal. Sous Protêt. Je propose un second.
60.2 Adoption des modifications à la
[1:51:34] politique éditoriale concernant le bulletin
municipal. Contact. Section. Votre conseil.
GRS
[1:51:42] comme trait d'union zéro zéro deux. Je propose.
Je. Seconde en faveur. Dépôt du item 60.3
[1:51:56] déposée de The City Report on the participation
aux élections municipales. Officers in the
[1:52:01] Professional Development program. Entitled
municipal Ethics and good conduct in
[1:52:06] municipal after all of my colleagues have been
good students and have followed the
[1:52:14] training and I completed mine today. So we'll
be back with that the same that same items
[1:52:21] next month for my for my training. 60.4 Résolution
en appui. Sorry go ahead, you can
[1:52:31] do it. Résolution en appui à la Journée
nationale de promotion de la santé mentale
positive le
[1:52:40] 13 mars 2027. Je propose juste secondes. Alors
tous en faveur. Excellent! Idem 6.6 is the
[1:52:52] request for approval of a custom traffic sign
for the city of Beaconsfield. Yes! So
[1:53:03] this custom sign is for the light at the well
different lights for pedestrian crossings
[1:53:13] in the different the way the three areas that
we have with with traffic lights all of them
[1:53:21] worked with pedestrian crossing. They all worked
and and the sign in question is simply to
[1:53:29] indicate that there on the circle. There's
no need to press a button or if there is a
[1:53:34] lack of a button people eventually will have
their priority to cross the lights
[1:53:42] are on a cycle. So this will be installed shortly
now that we've adopted it or we will
[1:53:51] adopted. I guess all in favor. Thank you for
confirming what I just said. Item 60.6 est
remis
[1:54:03] à un autre conseil. Point 70.12 séances du
conseil d'agglomération Agglo Meeting
[1:54:13] General Twenty night was for the purpose of
adopting the agglo budget and more recently
[1:54:21] on the night last week. There was a number
of items on the agenda, but one thing that
I
[1:54:27] think is worth mentioning is that the city
of Montreal, the agglomération including the
[1:54:33] d'emerging municipality are in favor and adopted
a resolution asking the Quebec government to
[1:54:43] consider its dismissal of the programme de
l'expérience québécoise, which is forcing
[1:54:53] people who have been working in and living
in our community for a long time to leave there
is
[1:55:02] no grandfather close, which in the opinion
of everyone at the council is wrong. So we're
[1:55:09] asking that if the government government wish
to make changes to its programs. That's one
[1:55:14] thing, but those who came here. On est certain
set of guidelines expecting certain
[1:55:22] things to happen and sur certain representant
representation being made to
[1:55:27] them that this would lead to permanent residency
should be grandfathered their valuable
[1:55:35] contributor both from an economic and the social
standpoint and so we supported
[1:55:41] that resolution. Rapport des directeurs point
80.1. M. Boileau. Rien de spécifique à
[1:55:50] mentionner, Monsieur le Maire. Merci. Alors
nous n'avons pas de nouvelles affaires. Je
[1:55:54] propose ou quelqu'un propose t il la levée
de la séance? Je croyais qu'il avait pu avoir
[1:56:02] une dernière période de question du pouvoir.
J'avais une question peut être légitime
[1:56:07] à poser. On va fermer la séance et vous pourrez
nous poser la question parce que la période
[1:56:13] de questions est terminée. Alors je propose
à la veille de la séance, je seconde en faveur.
[1:56:26] Merci. Good evening everyone, Thank you for
being here in the room and for following us.
A
[1:56:32] Donc merci