[0:11] Alors bonsoir et bienvenue à cette séance
ordinaire du conseil municipal. Good evening,
[0:14] Welcome to this regular meeting of the Municipal
Council. Lundi le 20 avril 2026. April Twenty
[0:22] Twenty twenty six. Alors on va procéder à
l'ouverture de la séance Opening of the Meeting.
[0:31] Adoption de l'ordre du jour. Adoption of the
agenda. Adoption of the Agenda,
[0:36] Beaconsfield Regulatory Council of Twenty Twenty
six propose. Alors, avant de débuter ou
[0:52] d'aller plus loin avec la période de questions
du public Before we move on to the public
[0:57] question period, nous avons le commandant du
pédicure. Commandant Gosselin, bonsoir et
[1:04] bienvenue qui will be able to see a few words
as to what are there police for has been doing?
[1:14] Merci beaucoup. Merci. Bonsoir tout le monde!
Donc pour le mois de mars et avril dernier,
[1:31] au niveau de la sécurité routière, en fait,
ce matin de l'opération, entre autres, la
[1:37] majorité de ses opérations là, c'était
pour des opérations. J'espère que j'aurais
pas
[2:08] besoin de recommencer au complet. Je pense
que oui. Alors monsieur, vous disiez je
[2:18] voulais, je recommence réellement ou juste
rapidement s'il vous plaît. Si vous
[2:24] insistez. Donc au niveau de la sécurité routière,
on a fait au dessus d'une trentaine
[2:29] d'opérations dans les mois de mars et avril,
majoritairement pour des opérations de vitesse,
[2:34] mais également pour des opérations, pour
une plainte que nous avions eu sur le
[2:38] boulevard Saint-Charles à la sortie du centre
d'achat pour le virage interdit à gauche à
[2:42] la hauteur de prairie. Merci. Au niveau prévention,
mes agents sociocommunautaires ont
[2:49] fait plusieurs présentations à l'école secondaire
de Beaconsfield sur la
[2:54] cybersécurité. Lors du dernier conseil, je
vous avais informé de l'arrestation de trois
[2:59] individus impliqués dans des introductions
par effraction sur le territoire du West
[3:03] Island. Depuis ces arrestations, nous avons
eu d'autres arrestations supplémentaires en
[3:08] lien avec les introductions par effraction.
Le 10 mars 10 mars dernier, deux individus
ont été
[3:14] arrêtés à demeure des Ormeaux et le 1eʳ
avril 2 autres ont été arrêtés à Roxboro.
[3:20] L'ensemble de ces personnes était particulièrement
prolifique dans tout le West
[3:23] Island, et ils ont pu être reliés à des
introductions par effraction commises dans
le
[3:28] secteur du Pdq un. Nous sommes convaincus que
ces arrestations auront un impact significatif
[3:33] sur les introductions par effraction dans notre
secteur. Les arrestations réalisées en
[3:38] février, mars et avril concernaient des individus
appartenant à des groupes
[3:44] différents, Donc, en fait, ceux de février
et de mars étaient du même groupe, mais des
[3:50] cellules différentes et celles d'avril, un
groupe complètement différent. Donc on a
espoir que
[3:56] nous sommes très confiants d'améliorer notre
bilan au niveau des introductions par
[4:00] effraction. Pour votre information, dans le.
Depuis le début de l'année, au niveau des
[4:05] introductions par effraction pour le secteur
spécifique de Beaconsfield, nous avons eu
[4:09] seulement trois introductions par effraction
et aucune introduction depuis ces
[4:14] arrestations. Pour terminer, j'aimerais vous
informer que mercredi de la semaine
[4:20] prochaine, le Pellicules un soulignera le 30e
anniversaire du décès de l'agent André
[4:25] Lalonde à Senneville. Une marche commémorative
aura lieu avec un départ de l'hôtel de
[4:30] ville et un parcours jusqu'au mémorial qui
est situé à l'intersection du chemin
[4:34] Senneville et de la rue Elmwood. Cette marche
se déroulera en présence des motards, la
[4:40] cavalerie du groupe d'apparat du SPVM, des
policiers du poste un un de la direction du
SPVM,
[4:46] de la famille et des amis de Monsieur Lalonde.
Des allocutions seront prononcées
[4:51] sur le site du Mémorial, puis l'événement
se conclura par un cortège de véhicules de
[4:56] plusieurs unités du SPVM. Donc, vous êtes
invités à joindre à l'événement tout le
long du
[5:02] parcours si vous souhaitez y assister. Je suis
ouvert à vos questions. Anybody have a
[5:09] question for her. Commandant, est-ce que vous
avez des questions pour le commandant?
[5:14] Le 29 avril? La marche devrait débuter à
9 h 45 sur le chemin Senneville, à partir
de l'hôtel
[5:21] de ville de Senneville jusqu'au Ann Wood. D'autres
questions? D'autres questions? D'autres
[5:30] questions? Non. Alors merci, commandant. Merci.
Bonne soirée. Bonne soirée. Alors before
we
[5:40] move to the question period, There's a few
words that would like to entertain you with.
[5:46] J'ai préparé une allocution parce que nous
sommes à un moment important. Donc,
[5:51] Mesdames et Messieurs, chers collègues du
Conseil et à tous les citoyens et citoyennes
qui
[5:55] nous écoutent de la maison, ce soir marque
une étape importante pour notre
[6:01] communauté. On en a parlé longuement dans
le passé, c'est maintenant officiel. Je vous
[6:06] annonce avec beaucoup de fierté le lancement
du volet public de la campagne philanthropique,
en
[6:11] appui à la réalisation de notre futur centre
culturel de P15 Field. Cette campagne a comme
[6:18] objectif d'obtenir des dons totalisant 2 millions
de dollars, témoigne, comme le
[6:23] projet lui même, d'un véritable élan collectif
qui résonne fort auprès de notre communauté
[6:31] depuis plusieurs années. Un souhait clair
a été exprimé, celui de voir naître un
lieu
[6:37] accueillant, dynamique, dédié à la culture,
à la créativité, à l'apprentissage et aux
[6:43] relations humaines. Alors aujourd'hui, un communiqué
de presse a été émis un peu plus
[6:49] tôt en soirée. Cette vision là prend vraiment
une nouvelle forme de Financial Framework of
[6:55] this project is very solid supported in part
by government funding and the use of city
[7:03] reserves. It is also made possible and that's
where it gets very interesting by the
[7:10] exceptional generosity of veterinary donors.
Thanks to the remarkable generosity of
[7:17] many beaconsfield residents. I'm very happy
to announce that up to one point 6 million
$ of
[7:25] our two million dollar goal has already been
razed. I would take a moment to recognize our
[7:33] lead donors Lorne and Louise Trottier, Chantal
Carrier and Louis Vachon, George and
[7:42] Georges and Hélène LN Bourrel as well as
another family, you made of considerable
[7:49] contributions, but I wish to remain Anonymous
together. They have contributed to the tune
of
[7:56] one point, one five million dollar to this
campaign. This is remarkable momentum and it's
[8:04] one that reflect a deep confidence in the project
in our cultural center and the
[8:10] future of our community. I would also like
to acknowledge the generous contribution of
[8:17] fifteen other Beaconsfield family and individual
who have made significant personal
[8:23] donations and the four and five fingers range
and of course, I would like to thank all of
our
[8:30] wonderful campaign ambassadors their members
of our community active participants and our
[8:37] recognized. Associations in the organization
and I've been working tirelessly on behalf
of
[8:42] the city to mobilise our community and create
this momentum and finally I would
[8:49] like to thank our express a special thank you.
The moment of recognition and of gratitude
[8:55] to miss Caroline Tison for her outstanding
commitment energy and leadership. Caroline,
if
[9:02] you are at home and you are watching I want
to thank you. WE would not have been able to
[9:07] do what we've done so far without your help
and it's greatly appreciated. Alors donc,
[9:12] aujourd'hui, nous passons à une nouvelle étape.
Parce que cette campagne philanthropique que
[9:17] nous lançons, elle est d'abord et avant tout
une invitation, une invitation à l'ensemble
de
[9:22] la collectivité. À vous, chers citoyens,
chers concitoyens, à nos familles, à nos
organismes,
[9:28] à s'approprier ce lieu avant même qu'il ne
voit le jour. Comme nous le savons, le centre
[9:34] culturel sera construit. Mais cette campagne
est l'occasion de dire j'en fais partie. I'm
a
[9:40] part of it because the cultural center will
be much more than the municipal building located
[9:47] on an exceptional sight, it will become a true
gathering place. Acceptable. Except
[9:53] accessible to all our generation meet we're
ideas flow and the arts and
[10:00] innovation can flourish it will be a place
for youth to discover their talents their
[10:06] passion a place for family to gather and learn
and a place for our senior members to
[10:12] continue to thrive and continue to be active.
I hope for our artists our community
[10:20] organization really in our entire population.
En contribuant à cette campagne,
[10:26] cette invitation vous est lancée. Vous aurez
la chance, la possibilité de laisser une
[10:31] trace et de participer à quelque chose qui
nous ressemble et qui nous
[10:36] rassemblera. J'aimerais souligner un élément
particulièrement important.
[10:41] Thanks to the General city of Mister Lorraine
and Mrs Louise Trottier, in addition to their
[10:49] significant initial gifts all future donation
of this campaign will be matched up to
[10:55] a total of five hundred thousand dollars. In
other words every contribution that
[11:00] we will be making will have doubled the impact
so. Thank you. Thank you very much to
[11:11] Lorraine and Louise Trottier. It is a concrete
opportunity to make your support go even
[11:17] further. Ce projet va bien au-delà de la culture.
Il s'agit de renforcer notre tissu
[11:23] social, de créer un lieu qui favorisera le
sentiment d'appartenance, de bâtir
[11:28] quelque chose qui reflète qui nous sommes
et ce que nous aspirons à devenir. And so
this
[11:34] is an invitation for you to get involved to
take ownership of this project and to contribute
[11:41] financially or otherwise there will be a number
of activity where you can volunteer as well.
[11:46] And so you can do a contribution up to your
capacity or your means and the
[11:52] form and shape that you prefer to favor in
Beaconsfield. WE define ourselves by the
[11:59] strength of our community. Our citizens are
the engagement, the general city and our
[12:07] commitment to community life and so in the
coming days and the coming weeks more details
[12:12] will be made available, you'll be informed
as to how we can take part in this initiative.
Y
[12:21] encourage you to follow our community and social
media, Beaconsfield vous informe, etc.
[12:28] And stay in for I invite each and everyone
of view to be part of this journey. Je vous
invite
[12:34] tous et toutes à prendre part à ce beau projet.
Thank you. Merci. Alors voilà. Alors pour
[12:41] la période de questions, je vous invite à
vous présenter au micro. Nous avons environ
30
[12:47] minutes. 30 minutes. I have some questions
from residents that were sending by email
[12:54] earlier. So I will I will reserve some time
for that at the end. So if you have a
[12:59] question, please come to the microphone and
line up behind so that we can proceed with
[13:06] that. En tout cas là. Question please proceed
to the make it will be ready to take your
[13:33] questions and the moment time. In the battery.
Yes. Sir. Bonsoir, Goodevening. I have a
[14:31] relatively lengthy, but I'm sure you can follow
along and I'm sure a lot of it you've
[14:37] already heard. Me. Patrizia Barboni. We've
communicated some over the last week. To me
[14:51] barboni. Thank you, thank you and light of
the fact that the STM confirmed to me today
that
[14:58] they do not proceed with any implementation
of infrastructure, including bus
[15:03] stop without the city approval that there will
be no retroactive changing of the
[15:09] stop because the city and their opinions was
consulted and that you run on the platform
of
[15:16] transparency constant communication, including
the listening of concerns, so as to
[15:21] properly represent the citizens yet refused
to act on citizens behalf. I'd like to know
what
[15:29] you want. Your legacy is made to be and specifically.
How do you determine when a decision
[15:35] cross the line from service serving the public
to unfairly burden in residence, and I also
[15:42] like to know who is accountable when that line
is crossed. Well. I don't know about the legacy,
[15:50] Madame, we're five months into the terms, the
information is I believe not accurate. WE do
not
[16:01] have a say and where the bus stop are implemented
and I can allow the director general who
[16:07] would have more direct or his administration
to have more direct contact with the STM to
[16:14] do to extend on that you contacted me with
respect to the bus stop across the street
[16:22] from your property about twenty to twenty-two
meters away from your property and the public
[16:29] domain. I'd welcome you to come to my house
at night. As soon as the sun is set to place
[16:37] yourself right in front of my house where the
stops is and then you could see what I eat
[16:43] what I drink what I watch on TV when somebody
is taking a shower when somebody is in the
[16:48] bedroom when the dog is in and out of the house
who leaves when they leave how often they
[16:53] leave when they come home, when they don't
come home, etc, etc. So you can tell me it's
across
[16:59] the street. It's absolutely irrelevant where
that stop is positioned is perfectly placed
[17:05] could have been coupled to the left couple
leaders to the right, the impact would not
be
[17:11] on somebody else in the same way that it is
on my barberini. This is not the debate. We're
[17:16] not here. I'm not the building. I'm telling
you there. There's no arguments. If you come
in
[17:21] stand in front of the street right across from
my house. You will see that my privacy has
[17:27] been reduced to zéro decisions by the STM
to install the bus stop on the sidewalk or
near
[17:34] the sidewalk does not change the visibility
into your living room that already exists if
I
[17:40] were to stand their by myself with you know
by myself or with other people right, because
[17:48] normally it sidewalk is for people to walk
by allowing you to express yourself. Well
[17:53] beyond the clouds of the time now, I'm having
the microphone. OK, well, I don't know I mean,
[17:59] I have the right to speak because in the email
exchange. You have consistently said that
[18:05] the STM is solely responsible and the city
has zéro accountability for the location
[18:11] of any of these stop yet when I talk to them
they tell me the city was consulted. So somebody
[18:16] is not taking the truth. Well, I am respectful
and curious right now we're not gonna have
[18:24] just to second everyone. If we are not able
to conduct ourselves properly at the
[18:33] microphone or in the audience. I will put it
into the question period. I don't want commence
[18:38] from anyone else between myself and the person
at the microphone or the person I
[18:43] allowed to speak. We're gonna keep that civil,
we're going to conduct ourselves as is
[18:51] expected from adult everyone. Yes, OK. So miss
barboni, I understand that you're upset,
[19:05] but the bus stop in front of your house is
not there as a result of the city is doing.
I
[19:13] have encouraged you to contact the STM. I don't
know if you've done that to request a
[19:20] evaluation of its location. I can assure you
because I've seen other emails in the two
[19:26] five, but repair other residents have also
expressed discomfort or I wish for a stop
[19:33] to be relocated and what I've heard or seen
rather from miss Paradis is that they would
[19:40] consider it So I encourage you to contact the
STM and present your request I have and I was
[19:47] told very clearly that because they consulted
the city. There is no retroactive movement
of
[19:53] stop. So what I have suggested to you was that
you contact a provided the information to
[20:00] reach out what I did what I'm going to do for
you and we're gonna move on after that is I'm
[20:07] gonna take your email. In fact. I'm going to
forward your email along with the information
that
[20:15] I have provided and I'll copy you to a specific
contact person in at the STM, and we'll
[20:23] see if the information that you get is the
same perfect. I'm happy to follow through.
Thank
[20:29] you. Hello everyone. Good evening, Good evening.
What's your name? Charles Johnson.
[20:44] Johnson Johnson. Thank you. Yeah. I'm here
tonight. Also I'm speaking about the church.
[20:51] I'm the president. The lord. Sorry about that.
It's a good thing. Yeah. I speak at the
[21:02] church, so but not ever. This is my first time
in inside here inside a meeting like this and
[21:11] I'm living in Beaconsfield of twenty six years
and I'm in Canada forty years. OK? What is
[21:18] your question? My question is I have the same
situation as this first person that was just
now
[21:24] in front of my house. I'm in the church street.
Sixth Street in Beaconsfield. Six zéro trois
[21:30] Third Street Beaconsfield. I was coming out
the house and I saw the this truck pull up
and
[21:37] I was wondering. Who's the people And I went
and ask I was about to leave the house and
[21:42] they told me that they are from the STM, on
the track, and that they came to both of the
[21:47] speakers for for the taxi. But now well, I
was speaking I've heard the boss. So I'm a
little
[21:53] bit now we're confused with bus en taxi at
all my taxi. However, there should be where
there
[22:00] going to put it and I said to them that why
why not put it like it before it down because
[22:05] right there is in the driveway right in the
driveway and I have some pictures of said to
[22:11] give something to some. The lady. Much. I want
to see the pictures. Yes, I'm just a
[22:29] second. I'll get a look at the pictures you
provided, OK? Why you have another one? Thank
you.
[22:40] OK. OK. Thank you. You're welcome. OK. So now
if you could see the pictures exactly
[22:50] where there is placed next to the driveway.
So if I'm coming down from street up. Let's
[23:00] angell street coming down after make a right
turn to go into my driveway. Yes, if I'm coming
[23:06] from the other directions. If I'm going out
how to make a left turn to go back in the
[23:11] same direction the bus stop, the stop is right
there. Yes, I'm seven years old. Thank you,
[23:23] but I was born in fifth eight. So I'm a more
years old. I loved by myself. OK, man in the
[23:31] fight for me or anything. So I'm there all
by myself. Now my worries is it is so close
to
[23:40] the driveway. I'm afraid that somebody go hit
me. I'm gonna hit somebody. Asking for me.
I
[23:49] don't have anything against putting it. There
are the property in the area there. I
[23:54] have no problem with that, that's fine with
me and I would support it to take the train.
I
[24:00] would get on the bus myself. Taxes et les bus
myself if needed. However, I am asking
[24:06] for is just one way from the spot that they
put it right now and put it in the pictures.
[24:12] There don't know where there are three et ready
made in about fifteen feet away from
[24:18] the driveway and that would be a perfect spot
and I guess with the from me. We'll be just
fine.
[24:24] So I'm asking everyone if the please, I did
call it STM and I didn't get anywhere. I call
[24:33] here twice. I still didn't get any where they
told me that I'm the security public security
[24:42] will be coming, passe by our site leave a message
for them. I did twice I've never seen
[24:47] anyone. I have never heard from anyone either.
So I'm just asking please, Yes, if you
[24:54] could just give me the way. I don't if it's
privilege of the world to you at this point,
but
[25:01] just to have me to believe in you were comfortable
and settled there as I say I'm here
[25:07] since twenty six years and I'm a single woman
of almost seventy years old and now that
[25:15] I would really appreciate and as I said fifteen
fifteen feet about my major. I'm not sure,
[25:23] but it's my fifteen feet down to where the
tree is and then we'll be alright. Well, I
can't
[25:30] make promise because I've told the previous
person and I'll tell you the same thing and
it
[25:36] is what it is. It's the STM that would do that
it's not public works. It's not public
[25:43] security. So I don't know if you want to leave
perhaps your email address I call and what
[25:51] we can do this as I've mentioned earlier. You
haven't heard back from the STM yet
[25:57] right Well, the secretary of the STM had the
first time when I call the call back and said
[26:04] this thing been going on since two thousand
and two, they have it OK, but but, but that
was
[26:11] not my question to them either leave a question.
So I was kind of wondering. Why would they
[26:16] give me the answer when it was not my question.
So what I can what I can help you with what
[26:21] we can help you with this is perhaps get in
touch with someone that would give you
[26:26] answer specific to your situation. If you want
to leave your email address I used with
[26:32] the city clerk at the end of the table that
would be helpful the other thing in the meantime.
[26:38] You know it is a pool and a bus stop, but it's
not going to be a service that runs on a
[26:45] regular schedule with regular sized bus. Essentially.
It's it's a collective taxi
[26:55] collectif. So taxi bus used in your neighborhood
yourself included. You phone about
[27:01] thirty minutes ahead of time and your request
someone to come and pick you up. So it's a
[27:06] car with it like a driver and in the taxi really,
that's just come and fix you up and bring
[27:12] you either to repair train station or on Beaconsfield
boulevards, so that you can
[27:19] connect to one of the regular main bus lines
bus routes. So you, you don't have someone.
[27:27] That's gonna be there at that stop from morning
through evening on the regular
[27:32] scheduled to come and be picked up by a large
bus. So it might be something that you're going
[27:37] to see somewhere. You know someone there is
I don't know if it doesn't time the day
[27:42] perhaps perhaps not, but it's gonna be you
know just a short period of time for someone
to
[27:47] either be picked up or dropped off, but in
the meantime you will try and get you in
[27:53] connected with it with someone at the STM that
can answer your specific request. OK, it is
[27:59] there gonna be a garbage kind of something
garbage can or something for now. There is
we
[28:06] have to check it over here. I don't think so
because I'm always in my driveway. We'll be
[28:11] comme otherwise the driveway area and the area.
You will become the two water bottle
[28:18] there. Des You know what they said and the
other. To meet with the car and driver at the
[28:26] specific time not on a regular schedule. So
you're not gonna have six people lining up
to
[28:32] wait as they are right now on the boulevard.
Doesn't mean well coming out, Not night live
[28:40] not night. Yes, sometimes I do and are coming
home from church of the young people from to
[28:45] which also I do volunteers do that. So when
I get back my house and if somebody the body
[28:51] taxi are the bus. There are the living at night.
I don't have to call the police at somebody
[28:56] is kind of hanging around. I don't know what
this schedule will be, but my understanding
[29:00] is that they they pick up and they drop off
and then they move so because they they're
[29:05] not waiting there it. It's just there is designated
waiting areas for those car that offers
[29:12] the services to to wait for calls. Essentially.
OK, ok. Thank you for your time and
[29:19] sorry about my time because I'm new to the
whole thing. I've never heard of it before
I knew
[29:24] it does still there and so I'm all confused.
OK, ok, thank you very much to leave your email
[29:30] address will thank you. You're welcome. Montrose.
I'm here also to ask about the bus and
[29:48] I'm just trying to catch up a little here from
personal discussion. I it's pretty much
[29:57] five to the left to me to the right thing across
the street Nobody likes the bus nobody
[30:04] wants them and they're there for us. But we
don't want the service. So this is a very
[30:11] strange situation and when I refer to catching
up. I'm asking a specific question in
[30:20] that everything I see and it is a little bit
too. What the first question asked the STM
in
[30:28] the number of coats has said he spoke with
the city council. WE discuss this with Beaconsfield,
[30:35] we got the approval and the when you look at
the comment from the Beaconsfield City
[30:41] Council and from the city of Beaconsfield,
The answer seems to be and that's what I like
to
[30:46] clarify know they really didn't have discussion.
They didn't do anything they weren't asked
for
[30:53] approval, but that forget about even if they
really have just about nothing to do with the
[30:58] decision. So I'm just here in this question
is one of the ways to ask. What was actually
[31:07] discussed where there discussion between the
STM and the city did the city give the
[31:12] which LED to those concrete bus stop station.
Where did the city really have very little
to
[31:17] do with any of this, and I just like that to
be clarified. Approval formal approval, no
[31:29] where there presentation. Yes, we've spoken
here in the last several months about the STM
[31:36] coming in the fall of twenty twenty four and
making presentation to the
[31:42] administration and to the small group of city
counselor as to what their plans were part
of
[31:51] their plan included a proposed routes. As it
is now known as the two eleven X on going up
on
[31:59] the road and back, but it was more informative
in nature than requesting approval. We're not
[32:08] decisional in that matters, so overall, however,
and I think I've expressed that and I know
[32:16] that mayor burrell before me did as well we
support the expansion of public
[32:24] transportation in Beaconsfield, and if we want
to be more specific in the area, where
[32:29] that proposed routes is the long term and and
mount rows mount rose or windermere or
[32:37] whatever you, but it was the the STM that determined
which routes was going to be used in
[32:44] terms of meeting their target there under the
mandate from the RTM to increase readership
[32:53] and to bring traffic to to the new Rome station
and so they came up with which that routes
[33:01] and generally speaking, we were encourage our
residences to to take public transportation
and
[33:09] and for that you know service needs to be available.
I understand that you know in
[33:15] your cases and probably as you mentioned the
five house to your left or to your right.
[33:20] They don't want it. But it's it's a service
that what we're being told will will provide
[33:29] access to have your model of transportation
and the form of the train or the rem too close
[33:35] to twenty-seven hundreds of potential new users
and so as a group the previous council and
[33:41] this one support that so you support generally
interesting goal at the same time as
[33:53] counselors and as the council you represent
and the citizens of Beaconsfield. I don't
[34:01] remember Beaconsfield going and something.
This is one of the biggest things going on.
Maybe
[34:06] not as big is the new construction. It's going
on. But this is still a pretty big
[34:11] thing going out to the people and saying. Are
you in favor? Do you like it? There was a
[34:16] thing about the wall along the highway where
the city went out to the people and said do
you?
[34:21] Do you want this thing or not? And if you do
it, there were multiples versions of it.
[34:25] That's it. If you do it this. This version
and that you hear the city didn't ask the people
[34:31] anything and this is supposed to be a representative
council. I would have thought that
[34:37] granted, it's the STM and they have certain
powers, but at the same time politics is about
[34:42] moral regions and city council have a certain
amount of power as well in this and that I
have
[34:49] no memory of my Beaconsfield City council,
saying. What do you think you would have And
[34:55] you are correct. It's a good question. It's
been. It's been asking. It's been addressed
[35:00] before but one of the fundamental differences
between the sound wall. If we stay with
[35:06] that example and and this bus route or any
bus routes really here and Beaconsfield or
in
[35:12] different municipality. The fundamental difference
is that the sound well would have been
[35:17] a Beaconsfield initiated projects in collaboration
with and that the MTQ, the STM its
[35:27] their project, its their route, It's their
design and we could not bring it to question
or or
[35:40] survey or have public consultation meetings
because the information was
[35:46] confidential, we have you know it's been asked
of me and I think here publicly if we send
[35:54] you no non-disclosure agreement, we have a
code of ethics and I think it's that section
for
[36:01] seven of our code of ethics, where it specifically
specifically states that we are
[36:08] not to share confidential information provided
to us in the performance of our duty, so
[36:16] that information about the proposed routes
belong to the STM a different body of
[36:23] different organization. They share it with
us to to inform us and and but we could turn
[36:32] around and and and go and and have or you know
participate in it means of of informing
[36:40] residences or sounding residences the STM tells
us that they had public
[36:46] consultation meetings in twenty twenty three,
I think or twenty twenty two or forget and
that
[36:52] was there means of trying to get, you know
what people wanted or didn't want what
[36:59] would work and what you want, but in this particular
case the reason why we didn't do it was
[37:04] because we want in charge of that files and
we were barred from you know sharing the
[37:11] information on till such time that there were
ready to to move ahead ventral as you know
[37:18] you know. Le chat est sorti du sac. The information
you know go out concrete slab we're pour
[37:27] and then questions started popping up and and
that's fine and at that point. What we did
[37:33] was to direct people towards the STM for further
information. WE ended up, you know.
[37:39] Facilitating brokering a meeting with some
residence and eventually the second one, but
[37:45] that's in a nutshell. Why it happened to where
it did did anyone from the city of the STM?
[37:56] Vast us to this confidential, but this is important
at this point the city ask the STM at
[38:02] this point. WE need to talk to the people.
This is a big thing, but is going on very narrow
[38:08] street. Possibly hitting children, possibly
causing also of other problems lowering
[38:15] propertyvalue. That's it. That's pretty big
stuff. That's a kind of stuff. I think I
[38:19] would expect my counselor to the STM and to
really bring this guy. It's time to losing
[38:27] that little shackles and let us talk to our
people. Don't you think that this is how a
first
[38:35] meeting on October fifteenth was organized
with the residents of mount rose and so
[38:41] they were direct communication between those
residence and the STM after the sims was board,
[38:49] so as you in the French expression. I will
use another fait accompli when people of
[38:56] money on big Samantha platform there much less
willing to change the minds about things.
[39:05] It's a bit disappointing, I would have expected
from the council. There is likely, but
[39:11] there was a conversation and that's when we.
That's when council and the city moved to
[39:18] organize the meeting, so I'm not here to fight
with you. I'm here to ask questions. So here
[39:25] is here. I think the question that comes out
of all of this. There are many many happy
[39:32] residents of Beaconsfield. There is an umbrella
goal of making the world clean and
[39:38] providing more public transportation and reducing
pollution, which are all the
[39:43] things. What can the city tell me in terms
of the following if so and so many people get
[39:55] together and objects to this. WE the council
will go fight for you to make major change.
[40:01] What can you give me of that if we do our beat
petition whatever to say look here is
[40:08] the tone of people who all say we don't want
this. What is the city willing to do similarly.
[40:16] What is the city willing to do they say I'm
from what I understand the city has put
[40:22] nothing on the STM on this, but for example
one thing that could be done is to say if the
[40:27] readership of this boss is below a certain
level as to make them essentially innocence
[40:32] because of not many people are using them to
say to the STM. You're just boring people of
[40:38] Beaconsfield, noble goal failure. Please get
rid of the bus is the city willing to do
[40:43] things like that there are this has been presented
very much as they came to talk to us. WE had
[40:50] a non-disclosure clause. WE could say anything,
but the time we talk. The Simon was
[40:55] powered guys. It's the Nobel goal. Come on
everybody. Let's rally around this, but to
the
[41:00] people too many people who beaconsfield. WE
don't see it that way it all and we would
[41:06] like our council to tell us things that of
the kind if so and so many people really are
[41:10] clear that they had it. WE will go too bad
for you or if the bus is full, we will go,
you
[41:16] don't make change. This is the kind of conduct
a expect from from the city Council. So what?
[41:21] What can I hope for I won't say what can I
hope for you from from my council, will? The
[41:31] announcement last week was the rams was coming
in two services on the end of may I heard,
and
[41:38] so we will as of the end of mai. Let's say
that that that speaks, then we'll have the
two eleven
[41:48] X and will I get it together with the STM they've
already in you know said so in the
[41:55] meetings that are referred to earlier that
they will keep an eye on things and assessment
[42:00] and will do our part as well so right now,
we have expressed concerns a strong desire
you
[42:10] included to not have a bus on monte rose and
so we'll see you said. There was that you have
[42:19] expressed it. You are saying that you have
heard that have expressed it that the desire
to
[42:25] do not have the bus in Montreal. Ah ok. What's
the implementation of the bus line
[42:34] actually you know we have objectives situation
that we can take a look and rely on and
[42:43] collect data if you are speaking of readership,
you know if we have a number of
[42:51] orange or yellow or perhaps you know, let's
knock on wood red flags will will have
[42:57] conversations and the STM doesn't want this
to to fail and doesn't want to. I don't
[43:03] think you know doing it just so that they can
have a bus line. They are under the strict
[43:10] budget. They are running a deficit if they
can run the cost of this operation
[43:17] somewhere else where it would be more profitable.
I have a feeling that they would be that
[43:22] be happy to do that so what I suggest to you
is that you know soon. We'll go into lake fact
[43:32] that can be objectively witnessed and and considered
evaluated and as the case may
[43:39] be well will do the adaptation or will do the
will have the conversation that might be
[43:45] required, but I don't know exactly specifically
what that could be or what for it could
[43:50] take it depends on the issue, but I hear you
and that the door is not closed. The just
[43:56] you know will turn the page, we'll go into
operation and see what it looks like and then
[44:02] will will ss recess if needed those are very
worthy sentiment, but they're all very fluffy
[44:13] words. Well what you now that I see right now
on September thirty twenty twenty six all
[44:20] pull the plug because of each and said and
all the running. That's not at all what I said
[44:26] and what you asked me. So I can give you an
answer. It would be wonderful to hear that
you will
[44:34] take this under advice and by the next, you
know what in the council meeting or two or
[44:40] whatever is something if so and so many people
are clearly against this bus routes that
[44:47] the city will go and back to make major change.
For example. I'm not think I'm just saying,
[44:52] that's the kind of ensures that would be nice
or if the readership is below the amount
[44:58] that the city and make and make some some number
and say if it is believed that the city will
[45:03] consider this to be more of a new and of service
and will present strongly with the STM
[45:10] using this powers of moral and so that exist
in politics at all levels to say to the STM.
[45:16] Guys it didn't work try try another route,
try something else where it would be
[45:21] wonderful to hear you say yes, you agree with
that approach. You can't guarantee anything,
[45:26] but you agree with that in concept and if the
numbers are that way Yes, you could see
[45:31] that happening that would be nice to hear you.
Yes, What? Yes, I would be nice to work,
[45:45] but but I don't have. I don't have the threshold
for readership. I don't know what
[45:55] you know. I don't know what you mean. You don't
have an official one. I don't have one.
[46:00] I don't have one and I know you don't have
one. I agree with you, but we can make one.
You
[46:07] know what you've mentioned that we're elected
to represent and correct right. You have a
[46:14] representative specific in district six or
district five as the case may be seven.
[46:21] WhatsApp. M5, M6. Oops sorry, I thought I was
seven but together but together, we have
[46:31] we have an obligation to represent close to
twenty thousand residences and and
[46:37] some of those residences à arms and mount
rose and on the side streets everywhere those
[46:43] twenty-seven twenty seven hundred or so residence
some of them will rely on public
[46:50] transportation. So so possibly so what I'm
coming to is to keep an open mind and I'm sorry
[46:57] if it's fluffy to you, but keeping an open
mind is always a good thing. I encourage
[47:02] everyone here to do that so what time and so
keeping an open mind is what I engage and
[47:08] when I'm coming to do and if there are several
issues one of which being readership other
[47:15] ones being traffic or whatever you will cross
that bridge when we get to the river and what
[47:21] we're keeping an open mind and it's not out
of the question, but right now we have nothing
[47:27] to work on there is on the one side roses residents
who are concerned and I get that and on
[47:33] the other side. There is the STM that is well,
the readership will be there and we
[47:39] don't consider safety issues to be president
that would prevent us from writing, so as of
my
[47:45] eighteenth and there after will collect information
and eventually will have a clearer
[47:53] picture of where we stand the STM can do several
things and so can the city of Beaconsfield
[48:00] in terms of facilitating or correcting issue
as they present so will keep an open
[48:06] mind. That's all I'm telling you. Nothing is
said in stone Rolling the microphone into
[48:12] account. Just two little points to make that
I think just to correct something I think you
[48:19] might be misunderstanding. I've spoken to two
parents who do not live and montrose, but who
[48:25] is children last summer road their bikes along
Montrose in summer to go to the pool, the
[48:33] windermere pool and that's the same they're
gonna be sharing that street with city bus
and
[48:38] their young children and up untill now, car
we're not concerne really bus. We're not
[48:47] there is the occasional truck. There's always
rénovation going on but I've never made anybody
[48:52] in the past who was concerned really about
their kids and Montrose now people who don't
[48:57] leave in Montreal, his children bike along
Montreal to go up there concerned. The concern
is
[49:03] not just a group of people in Montreal. Saying
we don't want the city bus and I don't know
[49:08] if you know that, but I thought I should clarify
that because I don't think that it is, it is
[49:13] relevant and the other thing that and I would
welcome some sort of plébiscite people that
[49:19] I know who I am said I take my car. I'm gonna
take my car. Yes, there's a bus and it makes
no
[49:26] difference to me. I'm taking my car. That's
yes. I know some people will take the bus,
of
[49:32] course. Definitely some people will and the
question is how many well, but I think
[49:38] ultimately again and you ask you know what
would I want from you? It would have been nice
to
[49:42] here. If this still is going on and festering
six months from now, we can have a little local
[49:48] vote and say look who who wants the boss? Not
just the people in Montreal, Obviously, all
the
[49:52] people who are in the zone that they would
take the bus. So that's another thing very
[49:57] specific not fluffy, but very specific that
for example the council could think about and
[50:01] say yeah. If if this is still festering by
this that we will do something to gather more
[50:08] data very tangible data visible data that then
we can all and discuss and debate right? Yep,
[50:16] and so what will do is eventually sit down
and look at things and decide what the best
[50:21] course of action for everyone is alright. Thank
you, You're welcome. Mr Mr Makuch. I'm your
[50:35] counselor team Queen. You can send me an email.
WE can continue to the dialogue. If
[50:39] you'd like the team at Beaconsfield that I'm
happy to communicate more with you on
[50:45] this. One of my name is trying to get it with
you don't discuss it and it came out of
[50:51] the very best of the way you approach to you.
So that they say appreciate the same. It
[50:58] sounds nice, but apparently, that's it very
well, that's it. If you all the offer is there.
[51:05] So you take it up or you don't. Thank you.
Hello, my name is Nadine Echecs and I'm have
a
[51:16] question. Just regarding. I know it's really
early, but we see what's happening on Manfred
[51:21] and the same and so on and so for Canada post
that is coming up and time flies, and so I
[51:32] don't know obviously, it's gonna be in my opinion.
I'm guessing from everything. I'm
[51:37] hearing it's gonna be Canada post initiative
and I used to leave in the video before and
[51:46] we had a Canada post box on our lands, but
in on the side very well placed very well hidden.
I
[51:52] had no complain about it. I'm just wondering.
It was a new or built area. WE don't have boxes
[52:00] right now. Maybe I don't know about all the
areas in Beaconsfield, but there are
[52:05] known and some of our areas or older and sometimes
I'm looking at the areas and I'm like where
[52:10] where the box go and so on and so forth like
a community box or is it could be put in the
[52:15] mall, maybe and so on and so forth and I'm
wondering one is Canada post gonna consult
with
[52:20] the city to will the residence on the on. You
know. Let's say whoever is linked if there's
[52:28] gonna be a box with those you know citizens
be advised ahead of time and how how do they
go
[52:36] about it should we communicate with Canada
posts like is there because you know times
going to
[52:42] fly and it's gonna come fast enough and we
want to start sooner than letters to at least
[52:47] have a little bit of assets if need be and
maybe they have this wonderfull designer who
[52:52] really have a good vision. I don't know but
often times every institution things to see
[52:57] things only with their eyes and not a global
view of things first, I thought that the
[53:04] design will be spectacular, but you know I
could be wrong. WE don't have currently our
[53:11] current information frankly what I know what
we know is what was made available to the
[53:19] public through the media last week and a few
weeks before that when it first clicked. I
[53:29] in the previous slide had that happen somewhere
else on the island. It started back in
[53:37] twenty twenty fifteen if I remember correctly
and then it, you know the conversion from at
[53:42] home delivery to communal box stops in twenty
sixteen and I don't know if they're going to
[53:49] do things the way they did back, then but there
would be consultation with municipality
[53:54] and the public the box back in twenty twenty
fifteen were never. I don't think if there
[54:05] were it must have been in exceptions. There
were never installed on private property
[54:10] there were always on the public domain that
can mean. However that it will be on the you
know
[54:19] grasp area in front of your property that is
the public domain. So that doesn't really,
[54:25] you know help all that much, but they did have
consultation. They did have meetings with
[54:33] local government and and residence and sometimes
to be there, they did change their
[54:40] plans to accommodate now that they do it all
the time for everyone know that was the case
[54:49] ten years ago and as as we get more news. I
think we'll have you no clear information for
[55:00] sure what we know I think from what I've heard
is that Montreal is not yet in the
[55:06] first stage or phase that they're gonna go
through so we have probably a couple of years
[55:12] of reprieve before we have to to adapt, but
what should we would it be a good idea for
us
[55:21] or for the other. It's the citizens of the
city council to reach out to them and say when
[55:26] you're ready, you know let us know or maybe
just because I'm just listening to everything
[55:32] that is happening and monrose, and I'm like
it's the same thing gonna happen with the
[55:36] postal, you know where the box have a feeling
and the director General and council. WE can
[55:43] have we can have the side bar on that later
on but the feeling. I have right now is
[55:49] that if every municipality, you know representing
the close to fourmillion fourmillion home
[55:55] that are gonna be transmitting towards that
sort of service where to contact Canada post
[56:01] that say we understand, but we'll get to you
when when we're ready when we have and
[56:07] you keep us up to date in terms of when when
you get information. I'm assuming,
[56:11] whenever you do get information cause I'm in
right now, Obviously, they have reached
[56:15] out to the city. Where you will you like if
you have more information than us regarding
[56:21] that or maybe even the plan will be kept if
they want to do if they want to use city médias
[56:33] to share the information for example for a
consultation or or something like that. Yes,
as
[56:42] you probably heard from the previous censors
or a couple of answers ago. WE do have a duty
[56:49] to keep mature is confidential when they are
shared with us if the body the organization
is
[56:54] not ready to go public, but so when we can
we will and if we can't, unfortunately, we
won't
[57:02] be able to do it. OK, Thank you. You're welcome.
Hello! My name is Nikki from my rose. You
[57:16] speak about? La consultation publique that
the STM constantly been referring to
[57:20] that they just don't bring it on the street
by the way you mentioned the bus that will
be
[57:25] passing roses that we don't have the benefit
of having taxi bus or rose, which was great,
[57:31] but you know how many people attended. Cette
consultation publique? I believe it's not a
[57:38] lot correct, actually Josianne Paradis rhinox
actually just aster she said. Une séance
[57:45] d'information le 27 octobre 2022, avec possibilité
de s'exprimer sur ses besoins en
[57:50] transport collectif. Donc 40 % seize personnes
habitent, travaillent ou étudient à
[57:59] Beaconsfield. D'accord, pas du 2600 ou du 2700
que vous référez depuis toujours. Ces
[58:05] seize personnes seront des combien? 19 zéro
zéro zéro à Beaconsfield? Est ce que vous
[58:11] pensez que c'est représentatif de notre population
qui sont affectées avec le bus
[58:16] maintenant? I think in for people you said
sixteen, it's pretty ridiculous right. So
[58:25] what's your questions? My question Is is that
you continuously said that you and
[58:29] council are for this bus. I was on the basis.
Are you for this bus because as he mentioned
[58:36] before me, you are supposed to represent us
and what we want because I think. On what basis
[58:46] was and that the question by continuing when
it's not, you know, it's a question period.
[58:54] So you have a question at it all right? So.
Excuse me is no need the minish just answer
the
[59:05] question. C'est bon. Yes, it's about if you.
That's what I was about to do before being
[59:13] interrupted, but you also interrupted me so
just want to put that on recorded go ahead.
[59:21] Yeah. OK, good so twenty-seven hundred people
is if you look at the map behind you right
[59:30] along elm and up mount roads and you stretch
about five meter either way you. That's
[59:40] the total number of residence that are in that
area. Those are the potential readers that
[59:46] the STM is telling us. We'll have access to
the twenty eleven. Next. Is at your answer.
[59:55] So in in the city of Beaconsfield. Multiples
questions and I've been here
[1:00:02] for two seconds much more than most people
have been here before. Yes, I've been here
[1:00:08] meals, I've been before and now I can ask the
question. Madame Massala. I don't want to hurt
[1:00:14] you with anyone and I don't want to hurt you
with you. Do you have a question? Ask your
[1:00:19] question? Yes, that was your answer that because
seven hundred people have no access
[1:00:24] to the bus that is why Beaconsfield and council
you as there and council. You are for
[1:00:29] the bus because now seven hundred people have
access to it. Yes, So have you ask
[1:00:36] yourself if those twenty-seven people hundred
people want the bus. What do you have that
most
[1:00:41] people want this bus as you said before or
as we all know you're supposed to represent
us.
[1:00:46] You're not representing the STM so I understand
the STM is telling you. There is the third
[1:00:52] person. I was there at the meeting. So you
don't have to tell me alone and I know all
of
[1:00:57] this. Is I don't have proof. The evidence will
be presented to us once the bus runs it
[1:01:06] circle back to a question that was asked earlier,
we'll go with representation made by
[1:01:14] residence in your area and representation made
by the STM and eventually will have
[1:01:23] verifiable objective information and then will
will assess or recess. But right now
[1:01:30] the position of the Beaconsfield council and
there are based on nothing there
[1:01:36] based on projections from the STM and when
your own residence that have elected you and
[1:01:42] everyone sitting up there and it's very nice
that you recommend and use the email
[1:01:46] team where bombardé team. He's told me. He's
not for the bus and I have it in writing. So
[1:01:51] it's very easy for you to say that the council
and everyone wants this bus when it's not
[1:01:56] true. It's very difficult because all he is
is Nikki. What do you want me to do? I
[1:02:01] don't know what to do anymore. We've done so
much and we feel as everytime we come to you.
[1:02:06] All you have to say is things the STM when
I talk to Josianne paradis. I speak to you.
I get
[1:02:11] the same answer it as if I'm speaking to and
STM representatives and that
[1:02:16] someone that supposed to represent and me.
Do you understand that because you're
[1:02:21] no longer asking a question. You are filibuster
in what I'm saying that I don't feel like
[1:02:30] you're representing us and what you're saying.
I don't agree with that I've heard your
[1:02:35] questions and if you don't have another one
last question. I believe on both sides of the
[1:02:41] tracks are on the twenty the common solutions
to these issues with taxibus and by the
[1:02:47] way where we have to stop across from our bedroom
window and living room window, and is
[1:02:52] stopped to inches from our driveway. So the
two people that were up before they were
[1:02:56] upset about one of those we've got two of those
and we got the large bus going down our street.
[1:03:01] So a very easy solution is to have parking
at the room. Obviously, not so easy. It's
[1:03:06] easy to say it, but it's hard to implement
clearly. So we have the Kirkland. Pierrefonds
[1:03:13] and Pointe-Claire. Markham forward publicly
to say that it's inacceptable that the room
[1:03:19] has no parking. You just say it's not gonna
happen and that's it. You can request
[1:03:24] there to be parking. It's not going to happen.
And it's unacceptable is that better.
[1:03:29] But it's not gonna happen. WE are because there
is no land. There's no land. There's no
[1:03:36] land. So even at the the fairview when there's
no land, there is privately and be
[1:03:42] Cadillac Fairview at the Kirkland and staging,
but what I'm saying is that there may
[1:03:47] have come forward to speak and say there should
be parking. It's ridiculous, you've never
[1:03:53] done that publicly. Now we have miss massala.
You've been here since July or June of last
year.
[1:04:01] That's not true well. OK, the point is that
it's been said Maire Bourrel has been very
[1:04:11] vocal about the lack of parking. It's an acceptable.
It was in the plan in the beginning and
[1:04:16] go pulled out. In the plane. I'm still please,
please, please, if you don't like to be
[1:04:24] interrupted considering. I don't like it anymore.
So cdpq sold land too. I don't remember
[1:04:31] if it's ryokan or. Another developer what I
views, that's it and eventually what they did
[1:04:40] with kirkland was to come up with a major residential
project near the Kirkland
[1:04:46] station and then that process Kirkland negotiator
in the use of two hundred space exclusive
[1:04:53] to Kirkland and just nothing else. So it's
inacceptable. It's not gonna happen. It's not
[1:04:59] going to solve any of the problem, but that's
the reality that them are the car. WE play
[1:05:05] with I guess my my conclusion to all of this
is that we don't want to feel like we're talking
[1:05:11] to the same when we're reaching out to the
council member or are made of our city that
we
[1:05:15] pay thanks to you repeat the same things that
Josiane paradis tells me she said. Il y
[1:05:21] a un besoin. And we have said that. Il y a
un besoin. Where is le besoin? When you're
[1:05:26] talking to sixteen people in the city of nine
thousand individual and you can even
[1:05:31] tell me if one of those people are in this
area. That's not a question. That's just what
just
[1:05:38] thank you. David aurait-il good evening? I
want to bring it up. Please, please, you're
gonna
[1:05:52] break your back. Thank you very much. Good
evening everybody. David overall this evening.
I'm
[1:06:05] acting as President of Beaconsfield citizens
association. We've heard over
[1:06:10] the last several meetings now council meetings
that Montreal is really becoming issue more
[1:06:18] and more again. It's taking up pretty much
the entire evening so far. I looked into it
myself
[1:06:26] this week, just too kind to get you feel behind
the scene of what I could find out. I had
[1:06:35] numerous conversations with the STM and there
it to me on several occasions. What's the
[1:06:42] STM officials and them speaking with her brackets
would not have proceeded without the one
[1:06:51] hundred pour 100. That they call it Beaconsfield
cooperation. So this is I think
[1:07:00] a lot of what's happening over the last bunch
of meetings. We're everybody doesn't seem to
[1:07:06] find that there is transparency between what
the STM are saying and what Beaconsfield council
[1:07:12] is saying, and I think that's what creating
a lot of the turmoil in the room is that
[1:07:16] nobody is really understanding the truth behind,
what's happening? So that's the first
[1:07:21] thing so they did made in that to me and two
or three different occasions that they
[1:07:25] would not have proceeded without the complete
one hundred pour 100 of
[1:07:29] beaconsfield behind them. So that's rather
than in itself. My question comes from this,
[1:07:43] the STM also told me that windermere was the
primary and the first choice for the STM.
[1:07:54] There for and they also indicate that windermere
rejected Beaconsfield rejected.
[1:08:01] This is based on the technical review. I would
like a copy of this review. If it's so existe
[1:08:14] so that's that's information that has been
reported in the the suburban and its inaccurate.
[1:08:24] This was through a conversation. I didn't go
to the source of it. All I just want to know,
but
[1:08:29] I'm telling you so some people seems to have
heard it for the first time tonight. But it's
[1:08:33] something that's been reported in the suburban
when the STM made its plan available at the
[1:08:38] in the first week of February or what have
you? As far as we know I mean personally and
I
[1:08:46] think counselor manual was that meeting the
only option in that area that was presented
to us
[1:08:56] was Montrose montross. So I don't know what
in the STM, how there communication have gone
[1:09:06] through that you can you can formulate a request
for the report. Yes, I can tell you now,
[1:09:17] but please consider it, you know as a access
to document request. There's no document,
[1:09:25] there's no report enough. Alright, so going
back with the collaboration. We've never been
[1:09:33] shy to say that we've collaborated that we've
had a presentation that they came up
[1:09:38] and they said up mount rose Counselor newel
was there I mentioned before there was
[1:09:45] another counselor. I'm not sure how it was
or if it was mer bourel doesn't matter anymore.
[1:09:50] But yes we collaborated and the previous Council
and this council has been supportive of
[1:09:59] that proposals on the outside of the twenty
and the north side of the twenty with the rem
[1:10:06] coming into force, and it was always a matter
of trying to reach as many potential users
[1:10:13] as possible and that's what the mandate of
the STM was and so safety concerns were razed
and
[1:10:22] we wanted to have them addressed. And then
we are we will broker facilitated
[1:10:28] meetings with with the residents and for for
now were satisfied with the STM
[1:10:36] representations that from their operational
and technical standpoint. The truth is safe
[1:10:43] and go back to come. Mais if if this service
is launched, then or whatever that it's launched
[1:10:50] that will then will come from a triticale set
of data or beliefs and will go into
[1:11:00] verifiable objectives visual constatations.
Sorry the word comes in in French, but there
[1:11:10] was never any any hidden truth that you know
there was collaboration or lack there of
[1:11:17] we've collaborated. Oui, before my time a long,
long time ago probably before our our oldest
[1:11:25] member of council are from twenty seventeen
probably yes by experience, but even before
[1:11:32] then we will pay a dire price for public transportation.
The feeling has always been that
[1:11:39] the area was under the underserved under service
and so when the opportunity to
[1:11:45] bring residents to either the train station
or there, you know the room was presented to
[1:11:50] us. WE looked at that with a very favorable,
I know. Nos questions. I agree with what
[1:11:57] you've been saying for the last six months
that we need to increase leadership and using
[1:12:04] public transportation, but what everybody has
to realize is that it comes at the cost and
[1:12:11] that cost is based on what I do for a living
and security and risk assessment. It's how
much
[1:12:17] risk is attached with taking the bus and bring
it up a residential street wear once
[1:12:25] again, I want that we feel it perfectly safe
to have two wheels on the right side of the
[1:12:32] line and two wheels on the left side of the
line. If so be it, we need to get around and
[1:12:38] obstacles with this to me is what if the Mrs
just just to give you and this happens
[1:12:48] already right. This forget for a moment forget
it for a moment the reality of the STM. It
[1:12:55] happens on monte roads it happens on beaconsfield
Boulevards. It happens on elms.
[1:13:00] If if vehicle is sparked and whether it's your
car the bus school bus city bus. What have
[1:13:09] you? They need for a moment to merge in two
or straddle the yellow line in the middle and
[1:13:16] generally what we see is that where we will
be enough as as as driver that we see the
[1:13:24] situation. WE recognise it either because we
need to wait to move on or incoming traffic
[1:13:30] six the situation and allows you know traffic
to to that way so again and in terms of risk
[1:13:39] assessment. We're going to have to go until
we have you know again the bus that runs with
[1:13:46] what the STM is providing us in terms of information
and and assessment. I've mentioned it,
[1:13:52] there is the third largest transit authority
in North America and the largest one
[1:13:58] having to deal with winter conditions as such
such as the ones, we have so I take it that
[1:14:03] you know the well-being of everyone, including
their driver's unionized driver's is
[1:14:12] being factors in and so will move on from what
we have now the period of weight and
[1:14:20] uncertainty on the part of concerns on the
part of certain residence and we'll see what
[1:14:25] happens if if it turns out that you know how
it works flawless will all be happy. I bet
can I
[1:14:34] follow up with yourself or with my counselor
with regard to this technical review and.
[1:14:41] Digging. Madame la greffière, if we want to
have Mr oral formulate just an email to just
[1:14:51] send an email with the technical review document
and will treat it as an access to
[1:14:57] document request. Thank you very much. Welcome
to have a good night. Je vous remercie.
[1:15:05] Non. You're good. OK. Alright. So will move
with the question from the public. WE have
one
[1:15:14] from Mrs. Barboni that was here earlier tonight.
Okay, in fact, it's it's not a question. Ash
[1:15:23] point out. It's more of a suggestion that the
question period should be longer than
[1:15:29] the thirty minutes a loud. And I think we're
just proved that sometimes it can be so will
[1:15:37] will take that you know the pilot that we have
was just adopted a few months ago And
[1:15:42] we'll see if we need to formalise it in a few
months time will just have a little
[1:15:47] bit more flexibility in the meantime. Next
question is from Alison smiley and she is asking
[1:15:54] and I think she is here tonight. She's asking
if we could provide more details on the
[1:16:00] cost of thirty 6 million dollar for point twenty
point two of the agenda to address
[1:16:06] renovation at the center currently your site
refers to a five million dollar cost that
[1:16:13] was presented by the previous administration.
I think there is on the actual recreational
[1:16:20] center, its stated as thirty-five million dollar.
I think you might have taken the
[1:16:25] five million dollars in relation to the renovation
of the arena. And then the
[1:16:31] question is with the cost included replacing
the zambonis. To an electric power one. So
[1:16:38] you'll have to you'll be happy to know that
we already have an electric Zamboni. It was
[1:16:46] purchased last the DJ just left for it to last
year or two years ago when we finished the
[1:16:54] renovation of the ring, we eventually transitioned
to replace the old diesel one for
[1:17:01] an electric one right. Carolyn Malcom has and
that's gonna be gonna be heavy. I have a
[1:17:13] question about the annual cost to the city
of Beaconsfield regarding STM public
[1:17:19] transportation, so the cost our share of the
STM budget. She wants us to explain how we
get
[1:17:29] to seven point. Two million-dollar as our share
of the STM budget and if there is
[1:17:36] any monitoring by the city given that the night
thousands citizens of Beaconsfield are
[1:17:45] about our used apparently the STM service so
on the basis of the charge calculated, the
[1:17:54] capacity provided us, etc etc. So. The cost
of the STM is calculated by the agglomeration
[1:18:08] and it is charged to the city of Beaconsfield,
that it is as a quote-part for other
[1:18:14] municipality. So it's not based on the number
of residences that we have. It is based on
[1:18:21] the fiscal or the taxation potential of Beaconsfield.
So there's a calculation method so
[1:18:30] our share of the agglomeration over all in
twenty twenty six is just a tiny bit under
one
[1:18:37] person. It's a point nine one one six Four
pour 100. So almost almost we could round it
[1:18:47] up to one pour 100. But it's not quite so the
STM budget in twenty twenty six is one
[1:18:57] million dollars, so that includes the bus transportation,
metro, etc, etc. Our chart is
[1:19:05] there for about seven seven hundred and the
seven million multiplicateur multiplicateur
[1:19:15] multiplied. I guess by points nine pour 100
and that gives us a 7.6 million dollar tab
for
[1:19:23] the STM. So the cost is not based on beaconsfield
residences or people coming to
[1:19:31] Beaconsfield basis is based on the value of
our. Totality of housing and and buildings,
and
[1:19:44] it's the same for all other sixteen municipality
that are the emerged and no, we don't we
[1:19:52] don't really don't really, we don't receive
report from the STM regarding data and
[1:19:59] readership and our incidence. Next question
is from my Nancy Ryan cheese asking a question
[1:20:10] about traffic stop signs and intersections
recently the permanent stop sign going east
[1:20:17] on mount roses that walpole was removed later
temporary stop signs were installed in both
[1:20:23] directions replacing the permanent ones is
there an actual plan for intersections
[1:20:29] and the associated costs since last year I
requested the document for intersection
[1:20:36] evaluation security and never received it so
the two. Misses Ryan, the two stop signs that
[1:20:43] you referred to it's a bit of a mystery, but
there were not removed by the city following
a
[1:20:52] verification last Thursday our last Friday
by our employees no city employee authorized
or
[1:21:02] carried out the removal of those two stop signs.
So we believe that is. It is the
[1:21:09] result of Theft or vandalisme. So that's why
we replace the sun as we were made aware. WE
[1:21:16] replaced those two permanent stop signs with
temporary ones until such time that we can
[1:21:21] reinstall them permanently and maybe look into
a more robust way of keeping them there with
[1:21:28] respect to the intersection planning and traffic
safety. The city does have a structured
[1:21:33] evaluation process intersection are reviewed
by public works in collaboration with the traffic
[1:21:39] Advisory committee based on established normes.
Most of them comes from the Ministry of
[1:21:50] transportation regulation and technical criteria
traffic, valium vehicle speeds
[1:21:56] collisions history if any and side conditions
so eventually recommendations are made and
[1:22:03] intersections that need improvement are then
prioritized and implemented as
[1:22:09] part of the city operational planning. So that's
for this reason and finally we have miss
[1:22:20] Corrado and she is making a recommendations
with regards to them on the agenda for the
[1:22:30] award of a contract the application of reason
for the ailment h baur and she wants to
[1:22:40] make sure that we enforce our bylaws and policy
to respect and protect the environment,
[1:22:46] the trees from construction development, etc.
Please also enforce below to protect
[1:22:52] wetlands all forest areas in areas with wetlands
need to become protected parks so miss
[1:23:00] Corrado the protection of the trees. The city
has had an active Emerald dashboard
[1:23:07] management program since twenty sixteen that
product triazine is derived from natural
[1:23:14] botanical, compounds, and it is supplied by
qualified professionals in accordance
[1:23:19] with recognized municipal forestry practices.
This targeted approach is
[1:23:25] specifically designed to be effective the goal
is to minimize impact on the
[1:23:30] environment pollinisation pollinator and public
health and we have bylaws regarding
[1:23:39] trees and wetlands protection. WE had earlier
tonight as part of the biolo review some some
[1:23:47] sections of a pilot that dealt specifically
with that and so this concludes our question
[1:23:55] period. Thank you everyone for coming and participating
and we will continue with the agenda
[1:24:04] and the items that we have their own just give
a moment to everyone that wants to go home
[1:24:11] to go home and will we will go have a good
evening. OK, So. Idem. Item 10.1. Donc c'est
[1:24:42] pour l'approbation du procès verbal de la
consultation publique de la ville de
[1:24:47] Beaconsfield du 23 mars 2026 à 10 9 h. Je
propose. J'appuie en faveur. IDM Ten point
To. Je
[1:25:00] propose l'adoption. In English. I propose the
adoption of the Ministry of the city of
[1:25:05] Beaconsfield Regular council meeting of March,
twenty twenty twenty six. Proposed. A second.
[1:25:21] Item Twenty Affaire contractuelle. Contract
item 20.1. Donc Item 20.1 Octroi
[1:25:30] d'un contrat de TP 2026 Trait d'union. Zéro
trois Concernant la fourniture de 202 2200
[1:25:39] tonnes de pierre concassée pour l'année 2026,
avec quatre options de renouvellement au
[1:25:44] plus bas soumissionnaire conforme. Soit Beau
Val Inc. Pour la somme de 62 629 et 1800,
[1:25:55] toutes taxes incluses. Proposé. Euh. Je seconde
en faveur. OK. Item twenty point two contract
[1:26:12] twenty twenty six for the expansion and compliance
upgrade of the big Anfield
[1:26:17] recreation center to the lowest confirming
better Construction Lavaca inc. In the amount
of
[1:26:23] thirty 6 millions one hundred and thousand
dollars and all taxes included. So before we
[1:26:36] vote I will say a few words and everyone that
wish to also express themselves on that can
[1:26:44] say so and then we will wrote. Madame la greffière,
je vais exceptionnellement voter sur
[1:26:50] cet item. Je vous demande d'en prendre connaissance.
So ok. That's the cultural. Not the
[1:26:57] cultural center, the regulation center. It's
a big. It's a big ticket. IDM. It's a big amount.
[1:27:03] But it's an important one in my opinion and
I think in the opinion of our past council
and
[1:27:09] and will soon see in the opinion of this council
before we go ahead. I just want to
[1:27:16] move back a few years and to give a bit of
the history as to how we got to where we are
and
[1:27:25] Pourquoi nous sommes rendus là où nous sommes.
C'est un processus qui date d'il y a
[1:27:31] quand même 27 versions des rénovations qui
sont proposées datent d'il y a environ 3 à
4
[1:27:40] ans. Il y a eu des discussions qui ont été
tenues dans le passé. On peut remonter à
2013,
[1:27:49] 2014, 2015 et éventuellement on se retrouve
avec un centre récréatif qui a aujourd'hui
[1:27:57] bientôt 52 ans. And with which essentially
no major renovations, that's all as ever
[1:28:06] been brought or conducted more recently we
had. Une étude de besoin by Raymond Chabot
Grant
[1:28:17] Thornton and started in two thousand twenty
three part of that process brought. Seventy
[1:28:27] five or so residences to participate in different.
Focus groups and there was also quite
[1:28:37] a important survey that was conducted in twelve
hundreds of our residences answered and
[1:28:42] participated in that survey and that gives
us a clear indication that the message was
[1:28:48] our infrastructure and the recreation center
particularly safer dur it needs to be it
[1:28:56] needs to be upgraded and needs to be taking
care of and rightly. So because it's one of
[1:29:01] the it's the second largest in terms of usage
infrastructure that we have back in twenty
[1:29:08] twenty three the data that we had was that
the hundred thousand people used it
[1:29:14] throughout the year so I hundred fifty people
participating a hundred
[1:29:19] thousand people participating throughout the
year to to those events that our health or
[1:29:27] organized at the center and seven of them being
beaconsfield residences so
[1:29:33] heavy usage and if if you were there in twenty
twenty three year, remember that the arena,
[1:29:41] that's now been reading was collapsing. WE
had plans to to do the whole thing and have
to
[1:29:50] stop knocking my my microphone, but we had
planned to do the whole Ariana, but we could
get
[1:29:56] to that goal fast enough. WE had to shut down
for I say five six weeks of memory serves me
[1:30:05] right, but it's more or less relieved in the
fall of twenty twenty three because the boards
[1:30:10] were tipping over falling down collapsing and
it was safe anymore and so that's when we
[1:30:18] truly came to realization that if we don't
invest fast, if we don't do it quickly. If
we
[1:30:25] don't come up with a plan, we're going to have
more events like that and and the pool.
[1:30:32] Obviously is the other blocks that is heavily
used by our residences. There is the pool
[1:30:40] itself, but there's the roof above the pool
and the end and the quality of the roof. So
we
[1:30:47] then and generally twenty twenty for the prior
Council February twenty twenty for two
[1:30:55] point 3 million dollar contract to ferme to
come up with a plan and to come up with spikes
and
[1:31:04] tender documents and eventually that LED to
what was presented to everyone through a special
[1:31:11] contact edition of what our plan the city plan
Council plan, then we were to refurbished the
[1:31:21] cultural and I'm gonna have to stop saying
cultural center in the recreation center, the
two
[1:31:27] arts and our minds and and so that was the
november twenty twenty four in April, twenty
[1:31:35] twenty five last year, we as a council. Unanimously
adopted the boring bylaw to the tune of
[1:31:42] thirty million dollars, because that's what
the plan that we had advertised as a group
[1:31:49] called for we are mentioning here that you
know the projected cost of renovation as
[1:31:56] it is presented was approximately thirty-five
million dollars. So we need it
[1:32:01] to borrow money for that and we did in April
twenty twenty five and it was made available
and
[1:32:09] public that as is being related to the ring
notably the building itself, generally
[1:32:17] speaking was nearing. It's the end of life
and it was important to to move forward,
[1:32:22] so that so that we don't have a sudden unexpected
once manageable or if manageable at
[1:32:28] the very very high cost, we needed to move
forward and so that's how we ended up with
the
[1:32:33] plan that we have and so today, we have a contract
on the table for thirty 6 millions Thirty
[1:32:43] 6.1 6.2 millions $ taxes included that is actually
coming in little below. The
[1:32:54] thirty-five million-dollar presented. Eighteen
months ago Thirty-five million dollars
[1:33:00] plus taxes. So we're going very well in terms
of what the money is being de how the contract
[1:33:10] was cost and and and how to bid came back,
we had six or seven bid competitive and so
we are
[1:33:19] going ahead with votes tonight and the cost
of not going ahead in my opinion would be
[1:33:30] tremendous. It would mean probably another
eighteen to two years and months to two
[1:33:37] years minimum in designing reconsidering what
would be acceptable and as you probably
[1:33:46] no as hormonée the worst time to call our
roofer is when the roof leaks and we don't
want to
[1:33:55] be in that position, so that's why I think
it would be a good idea to awarded the contract
[1:34:05] and make sure that we have a call center that
continuing to serve us throughout the work
as
[1:34:16] much as possible and eventually at term will
be to the early twenty-first Century standard
[1:34:25] and meet the needs of our community. So this
is what I wanted to say now if some
[1:34:33] colleagues want to see a few words. They're
all welcome to to do it. I have madame Gaudin
[1:34:39] and then. Madame Léveillé OK. Madame Good
and madame Well, I think I have almost everyone.
[1:34:48] So well. Rock paper season if you like now,
I don't mind. I'm I'm prepared. I'm not taking
[1:35:01] this decision very lightly. I comes from her
background of swimmers. My children have all
[1:35:06] performed in high aquatic swim so for us. It's
a very passionate thing I fully
[1:35:12] support the need of a new and modernized recreational
center for our community. This is
[1:35:17] important investment for the quality of life
of our residence both now and for the
[1:35:22] future generations, however given the scale
of this projects and costs, I'm not
[1:35:28] fully convinced that the current proposed to
deliver the level of value our residence
[1:35:33] will expect for this reason, I will have to
make my decision to reject the proposal that
the
[1:35:43] stand. Thank you. Merci, madame Gaudin. Je
ne m'avait pas vraiment préparé pour parler
de
[1:35:51] de ça, là, mais je peux, je peux commencer
If you want. Oui, je peux quand même dire
[1:35:56] quelques mots parce que c'est un gros projet.
C'est un gros contrat avec une grosse facture.
[1:36:02] So you know I think people who go to the culture
to the recreation center. Sorry Martin,
[1:36:08] you got this country to go to the recording
center can see for themselves that you know
we
[1:36:14] have a lack of accessibility in the building,
and the summer pool is not really up to todays
[1:36:20] standards, and we have a lot of space for our
residence to be able to do a variety of
[1:36:27] activity and the accessibility being of very
thing for me. So I think that this, I don't
want
[1:36:35] to repeat with Martin said, but it is a much
easier project to take on when you're not in
the
[1:36:41] state of emergency. And yes, I know we're not
having a second child of ice and we're not
[1:36:48] making in an olympic side pull, but we are
trying to take care of what we have with in
the
[1:36:54] body that we have available to us. So I'll
be supporting the the project. Thank you
[1:37:02] Counselor Rossi. Thank you maire me well articulated
on your opening statement about
[1:37:08] this. So thank you for that. I just want to
let everybody know. I'm a huge advocate for
sports
[1:37:15] activity and myself play two to three times
a week, so and so to our kids. This is a big
deal.
[1:37:22] I think it's important to have a recreation
center in our community. But my vote is gonna
[1:37:28] be based on evaluating the need versus the
cost and what we get for that cost and I'll
leave it
[1:37:37] at that. Council of Queen. Have all brought
up some excellent point. I just like to say
that
[1:37:48] I think for me. What would come with this really
this came down to was at the center is at the
[1:37:57] end of its end of its life, basically and if
we do nothing at the cost of doing nothing
is
[1:38:05] enormous. I think we are very close to having
a major break that would render a portion of
[1:38:16] the Rock Center inopérable. I was one of the
people that before I joined council that an
[1:38:23] email to this to the previous council about
the boards at at the rink, because they were
in
[1:38:29] such a dangerous decrypted states that I just
couldn't be so for that reason and with it
[1:38:38] with that context in mind. I will will be voting.
Yes this very important project is the
[1:38:46] lifeblood of the art of our community. It's
the center, It's the heart if you will and
[1:38:50] I think making sure that it is operational
for the next year is extremely important. Thank
[1:38:59] you. Thank you for Mercury annual. Thank you.
Resident here earlier this evening. He
[1:39:11] said something that was in my mind spot on
and were elected to represent and right we
live
[1:39:19] in a representative democracy, not just the
democracy a representative democracy and
[1:39:25] that means listening to the diversity of voices
of thought opinions. So it is normal and
[1:39:35] healthy that this body of elected officials
have differing opinions that means
[1:39:41] we're reflecting what we're hearing and that's
how it should be so. And and earlier
[1:39:50] order by experience, not by age. We've been
at this project for a number of years and theme
[1:39:57] rights, and I've said it myself a number of
times every year that goes by it cost more.
WE
[1:40:03] know this when I look at this project today
with you know a bit of a different land. You
[1:40:14] know. It's a good project. It's not great.
It's a good project it and quality of service.
Not
[1:40:23] quantity of service. We're not getting a bigger
pool and child of ice like Dominique said.
But
[1:40:31] we are making the user experience better right
accessibility is important.
[1:40:37] There's no doubt. The bathroom, the washrooms,
the air-conditioning, the the field
[1:40:44] of that that the quality of service. So it's
not quantity of quality and that's important
[1:40:51] recognize that, but we are having to make do
where we're not getting that second year of
[1:40:58] ice. We're not getting olympic sidepull. We're
having to make do and that's okay. Sometimes
[1:41:03] you just gonna make you right. You know I can't
have everything in life and
[1:41:07] sometimes I can just before what I can after.
However. Before I ask residence too deep
[1:41:17] into their pocket books to pay. I feel and
I use the word I I have to do my due diligence
to
[1:41:29] either maximize revenue find additional funding
or minimize expenses. So that my ask of us
[1:41:40] the residence because I'm want to is the least
possible, even if we're making do right even
[1:41:47] if we're making do. It's not just we're making
do pay. So when I look at this project do
[1:41:56] I feel that we've gone the full extend to see
how this can be funded other than solly azar
[1:42:04] stands today one hundred pour 100 by taxpayers.
Do I feel that we've done our due
[1:42:11] diligence and full or was there still room
and I'm not suggesting. WE changed the
[1:42:16] project. I'm not suggesting that we build bigger
because that as much as I would like
[1:42:21] that might not be in the books. So I don't
think this work is lost, but have we pumped
the
[1:42:29] brakes a little bit to do our homework from
the dollar aspects of this project. I
[1:42:36] don't have a straight answer. I know what my
God is telling me and I also know what we can
[1:42:44] achieve and Beaconsfield when we operate at
our best. WE are building a project that nobody
[1:42:53] thought could be built. I don't feel that way
right now, so for that reason. I'll be voting
[1:43:02] against this tonight. With the full conscience
that this building does need to those
[1:43:09] need to get done. Thank you. And last but not
least. Yes, you will not in any order of
[1:43:18] importance whatsoever, but it's so for those
people, if you know we look around and we were
[1:43:23] here over the years. I have you know all council
always votes together. It sounds like that
[1:43:27] the team was a good example tonight and something
where you can see how everybody has
[1:43:31] different opinions and and it's a lot like
that on a lot of topical name it healthy to
see
[1:43:36] the diverses opinions. Here tonight, so we're
starting off with an answer. Where do I
[1:43:40] stand for a whole cost of reasons I've been
on this council with a few years since
[1:43:46] two thousand seventeen. So here we have heard
of these projects and this particular projects
in
[1:43:52] different shapes and forms come up to the council
previous and certainly over the years where
[1:43:58] I've been here in different shapes and forms
and we always kicked it down the field a
[1:44:03] little bit for lack of a better turn. I think
it's coming to come to a point. Where we're
[1:44:09] getting to that point of no return. I think
anybody who is who said No here tonight to
[1:44:13] this is not denying that each other than the
significant degree from that standpoint. It
[1:44:17] needs to get down with words that consistently
like I think from everybody here at the
[1:44:20] table. I think only when I look back a little
bit. How we approached this whole thing we
[1:44:26] did public consultation. WE communicate with
the amount. WE are definitely due to
[1:44:31] communicate and share more information about
the plan. What does it look like and that
[1:44:35] we talked about that that something we definitely
to do to get there. WE need to know
[1:44:39] what we're gonna have an envelope of money
to proceed alright. So there's been a lot
[1:44:43] of discussion a lot of work on this over over
the period of fact, we've even put two and
[1:44:48] half million dollars into the project. So far
roughly just to get to the point where we had
[1:44:53] even to know in these days natural and benefits
of the seed. Even if you want, you
[1:44:57] have to put it money down to show that you
have a feasible project. So you don't just
make
[1:45:02] a great and then start from scratch. There's
a lot of investments that time and money
[1:45:06] that you have to pay and even get into the
into the program of great and so on so I'm
[1:45:11] trying not to repeat things that were said
before, but another element cause I do
[1:45:14] agree with a lot of what we're here and certainly
a little bit more for those who are for the
[1:45:19] project. I do feel we have a good project.
I do feel yes, we are mountain. I play hockey
in
[1:45:24] all disclosure some people were involved with
it with the pool, and so what I've done both
and
[1:45:30] you know when we had the Irina held in up with
wooden stilts for a while there. It was if
[1:45:35] any of you have been there. You probably got
my God, What's going on here and a lot of
[1:45:40] people that you know about said the same thing
now they just delighted and they're happy we
[1:45:44] have and that that really is as good as any
other running. You can get and all that gone
away.
[1:45:49] Do we feel you need another urina persons.
I don't think so and I'm a big hockey players
[1:45:54] for the size of our city and so what so for
people say yeah, Well, Pointe-Claire are just
[1:45:58] the name of the city has one. Well, yeah, but
that's almost double the size of our own city.
[1:46:03] But there's a lot of reasons for all that so
I personally feel that the service that was
[1:46:07] the main service is the poor and the arena
are very adequate to what we have in terms
of our
[1:46:12] city as we speak. WE also have the other notion
about about we are in some services. There
[1:46:21] will be air-conditioning and extra rooms for
this room for that so a lot of things can be
[1:46:26] done and are being down there before so I'm
not focusing just on that a lot of the paint
[1:46:31] points. I can through in the public consultation
and certainly the one that I have
[1:46:34] heard of our more subtiles more nuances and
I feel we are when I look at the plants and
I've
[1:46:39] seen them to address those for my opinion.
Yes, sir we'd like to have for stories and
[1:46:46] everything else on there. But I don't think
we have to live with in our means. I think
[1:46:50] we're providing a quality building that there
at the risk of it perhaps really closing
[1:46:55] down and and really starting over. So I think
we come to the point of we've certainly
[1:46:59] verpasst council. Have looked at this in the
past. I'll just make it back in two thousand
[1:47:05] nine and so one has been kicked down the road.
They said all we've got some time. The pool
[1:47:09] is not there is better shape of you trying
to plan ahead, but never and we didn't get
grant
[1:47:14] at the time for some of these projects. So
a lot of times, we just kicked it down the
field.
[1:47:19] I think we're run out of runway personally
on this thing. We've had feed back like you
wouldn't
[1:47:23] believe that we need to improve that we need
to enhance it. WE need to make it respectable
and
[1:47:28] you bring it up to normal all those things
that are probably not the things you want to
have
[1:47:33] like in news that turn in terms of when you
look at the infrastructure, but there's
[1:47:37] things that need to get done or otherwise,
it's it's not gonna happen. So what but back
to the
[1:47:42] budget side. We're talking about something
in neighborhood thirty 6 millions around that
[1:47:45] that that frame. WE are still not out of the
running for grand. There's still
[1:47:49] opportunity there and we'll see if we can go
with that, but I don't think we need to act
now,
[1:47:54] I don't think we have a wide project that is
there and everybody is shocked by how
[1:47:58] much things costs and and so and so forth and
that's just the life that we leave in, and
[1:48:03] that's the way things go for weight and we
do and try to do a bigger project while we
can
[1:48:08] act a lot more our first inclination was to
say what is it and start over and that was
[1:48:12] a few years ago and I think we are talking
around the neighborhood of over 8
[1:48:16] million de dollars. Right there, I'm not trying
to scar you with numbers. He is just numbers
[1:48:20] that came across us, so and I'm not trying
to do that to hang around that money. But you
know
[1:48:25] we're talking a lot more than than words and
it's surprising how much more going this bigger,
[1:48:30] You know this much more that much more does
increase the costs so I've coming to that
[1:48:34] realization accepted that and and looking at
the project that I don't feel I'm looking for
[1:48:38] the project. I'm actually really excited about
this project over all. So I think we
[1:48:42] have something for my opinion. WE think we
have something very robust and the nice project.
[1:48:46] That's there and for all of those reasons and
what everybody else said. I am
[1:48:52] supporting the project as well, ok, so drum
roll all in favor. Against. Thank you everyone
IDM
[1:49:09] twenty three items 20.3 Octroi du contrat.
TP 20 26 Trait d'union. Zéro huit. Concernant
[1:49:18] la réfection des trottoirs au plus bas soumissionnaire
conforme, soit Montréal
[1:49:23] scellant incorporée pour la somme de 130 604
$ et 95 sous toutes taxes incluses. Je
[1:49:32] propose et j'appuie en faveur. Idem Twenty
point for. Wording of contract TP twenty twenty
[1:49:45] six zéro for spot and centerline streets painting
work to the lowest confirming
[1:49:52] better Marquage signalisation Rive-Sud by inc.
In the amount of one hundred thousand nine
[1:49:58] hundred and the dollars and zéro 100 all taxes
included. I propose. Items 20.5. Octroi du
[1:50:17] contrat TP 20 26 Trait d'union. Dix. Concernant
le resurfaçage des chaussées au plus bas
[1:50:24] soumissionnaire conforme, soit Construction
viatec incorporé pour la somme de 1 000 446
138
[1:50:31] zéro zéro et 65 sous toutes taxes incluses.
Je propose je seconde en faveur. Item Twenty
[1:50:42] point six Wording of contract TP twenty twenty
six twelve for the structural rehabilitation
[1:50:48] work of sanitary sewer pipe to the lowest Conforming
better Institute for Technology Ltd in
[1:50:55] the amount of three hundred thousand three
hundred and 6 $ all taxes included I propose.
[1:51:05] Item 20.7 Octroi du contrat TP 20 26 Trait
d'union 33. Concernant le traitement
[1:51:12] préventif contre l'agrile du frêne au plus
bas soumissionnaire conforme, soit
[1:51:18] biocontrôle arboricole incorporé pour la
somme de 104 522 et 62, toutes taxes
[1:51:25] incluses. Je propose, je seconde en faveur.
Idem Twenty point huit. Of mandate twenty
[1:51:41] twenty six sixteen laboratory services having
the best final score groupe AB inc in the
[1:51:52] amount of. 100 hors taxes included. That. Items
20.9. Donc items 20.9. C'est l'octroi
[1:52:07] d'un mandat de gré à gré pour l'achat d'un
fourgon Ford Transit 350 avec trois
[1:52:15] surélevés RGC 2026. Trait d'union. Zéro
20 zéro sept à Olivier Faure Saint Hubert
pour
[1:52:23] la somme de 83 237 $ et 30 cents, toutes taxes
incluses. Proposé. Seconder en faveur.
[1:52:35] IRM Twenty point ten. Of the mandate by mutual
agreement for the installation of extelia
[1:52:45] Shantanu on already in place twenty twenty
one RGC twenty twenty six, eight two. Compteur
[1:52:52] d'eau du Québec cdq in the amount of thousand
three hundred three hundred and three
[1:52:59] four sans all taxes included. Un second. En
faveur. Items 20.11 Octroi d'une mandat de
[1:53:11] gré à gré pour une étude de circulation
en rapport pour Saint-Charles à 20 RGC 2026
[1:53:19] zéro neuf à Cima+ pour la somme de 45 867
$ et 20 600, toutes taxes incluses. Je propose
et
[1:53:29] je seconde en faveur. Item 20.12 dix Rejection
of bid for contract TP twenty twenty
[1:53:43] twenty twenty twenty for for en installation
and services for flow measurement services
in
[1:53:47] the summer Twenty Twenty six y propose. The
reason for this bid rejection is that it was
[1:53:56] not conforming. So we can't legally allow the
better to carry out the work and will get
[1:54:04] back to it either one way or another because
we still need the assessment to be done the
[1:54:10] measurement to be to be done so all in favor.
OK, Idem. Thirty point one alright. Approbation
[1:54:21] de la liste des comptes à payer au 20 avril
2026 et de la liste des paiements préautorisés
pour
[1:54:27] la période du 11 mars 2026 au 22 mars 2026
et du 24 mars 2026 au 7 avril 2026, pour un
[1:54:36] déboursé total de 18 000 488 et 88 $ et 60
800. Je propose et j'appuie alors ce mois ci.
[1:54:49] C'est une somme quand même assez considérable
que nous avons déboursé. In millions of
[1:54:56] that amount went to the city of Montreal, Well
seventeen point five millions went to Montreal
[1:55:04] and a little bit too. La communauté métropolitaine
de Montréal So Montreal, it's the
[1:55:08] cut Paul payments, which were made under protest
and locally. Here we had about little less
[1:55:16] than well for other and thousands. Dollars
for salary and that repayment and such so
[1:55:26] the customer in the city. This month appears
to have been for less than what we've paid
to
[1:55:31] Montreal and other government body, but twice
a year it's like that so all in favor.
[1:55:40] Thank you. I'm IDM thirty point two. Yes, I'm
very honored to propose approval of the
[1:55:51] financial contribution of twenty-four thousand
dollars to the Beacon Hill pool to carry
[1:55:56] out accessibility compliance work. I propose
I'm sorry Yes, I proposed. What I do and
[1:56:08] actually the president of the pool and the
audience this evening, Mister Dave whips Good
[1:56:13] evening Dave, I want to congratulate the Beacon
Hills pool board of directors. This
[1:56:20] is the second time that the Beacon Hills pool
comes to council to collaborate on
[1:56:28] project to improve the infrastructure at the
pool and in this instance, it's about
[1:56:33] accessibility. What you know and I'm from and
and there's the major items one items in
[1:56:41] there is a motorized lift, so that swimmers
with mobility reduced can be lowered or
[1:56:50] rising out of the water. That's what you need
for outdoor pools and beaconsfield to my
[1:56:56] knowledge will be the only outdoor pool to
offer that services to all the residences
[1:57:01] that that need the most help write so so on
y on a moral level what you aiming to
[1:57:07] achieve this is incredible and and I will see
how the vote goes shortly, but from a
[1:57:14] volunteer standpoint Mister whips, you know
we have a group of you know mom and dad that
[1:57:21] volunteer their time to write grants to get
letters of support from different levels
[1:57:27] of government, including the city of Beaconsfield,
but as high as are now you know
[1:57:33] speaker of the house. Monsieur Scarpaleggia
the put together a financial plan, they
[1:57:40] demonstrate how they're going to raise funds
to support this infrastructure project before
[1:57:48] asking for funds a bit of a common team there
right and and so I'm you know I want to
[1:57:55] congratulate you and your team. It's incredible
what you're achieving. Thank you so much
[1:58:01] and and on behalf of the residents and and
others. Thank you very much. So I'm very very
[1:58:07] happy to this this evening. So. You're welcome.
Section forty Bylaws Réglementation Idem for
[1:58:22] the item. 40.1 Dépôts et avis de motion du
projet de règlement by 184 intitulé
[1:58:30] Règlement autorisant des dépenses en immobilisations,
immobilisations et un emprunt
[1:58:36] de 3 060 000 $ pour des services professionnels
pour l'agrandissement et la mise aux
[1:58:43] normes du Centre récréatif. Je donne avis
de motion. Oui. Parfait. Merci. Items for the
[1:58:50] point to. Propose adoption of the second draft.
Bylaw Seven Twenty one two one. Entitled
[1:59:03] Amending Zoning. Bylaw Seven in order to modify
the number of material for multi-family
[1:59:09] residences buildings. Straight to add specific
standards for zone H trois three six
[1:59:16] concerning the slope percentage for in access
and leading to the parking area and to modify
[1:59:22] the standard concerning multi-family residences
industries and community
[1:59:27] residences. H for four zone each three three
six in order to render them conforming to
[1:59:33] the planning program of the city of Beaconsfield.
I can't. So. Madame la greffière, this
[1:59:42] would be followed by the public notice for
the purposes of registry to my petition, and
if
[1:59:50] there is petition received with the centers
for certains articles of section of the
[1:59:56] bylaw. Yes, there would be the register if
petition are received. Thank you all Item
[2:00:06] 40.3. Donc je propose l'adoption du règlement
Bic 165 tiret un intitulé Règlement
[2:00:13] modifiant le règlement Bic 165 concernant
le plan d'urbanisme, afin de préciser le nombre
[2:00:19] maximal d'étages permis dans le secteur C-1
à transformer et en construire, et ajouter
un
[2:00:25] secteur C-1 à transformer ou construire à
la carte cinq du plan d'urbanisme de la ville
de
[2:00:32] Beaconsfield. L'objet de ce règlement est
clairement indiqué dans son titre. Elle
[2:00:38] indique qu'il n'y a aucun changement entre
le projet déposé et le règlement soumis
[2:00:43] pour l'adoption. Donc, je propose et j'appuie
en faveur. For this is for the adoption of
[2:00:55] Bylaw Bikdash One Seven six Entitled Code of
ethics and good conduct for Elected
[2:01:00] municipal officer of the city of Beaconsfield.
This must be adopted in accordance with the
[2:01:05] requirements of the municipal ethics and good
conduct at its object is to present the city
[2:01:10] ethical values and the code of conduct rules
applicable to council members. This code
[2:01:15] emphasizes integrity the public interest respect
loyalty equity and owners and government
[2:01:22] conduct particularly regarding conflict of
interest, interference and post-terme
[2:01:27] obligations sanctions are provided in the event
of a violation of its rules. There
[2:01:32] were no changes between the drafts presented
in the notice of motion and the submitted for
[2:01:37] adoption. So I propose un second. Item 40.5.
Il s'agit d'un dépôt dépôt par madame la
[2:01:50] Greffière, du certificat relatif aux résultats
de la demande d'approbation
[2:01:53] référendaire, tenue le 31 mars et le 1eʳ
avril 2026. Concernant le règlement B AAC
[2:02:00] 180 intitulé Règlement autorisant des dépenses
en immobilisations et un emprunt
[2:02:04] de 2 500 000 $ pour des travaux de remplacement
des unités mécaniques au bâtiment des
[2:02:09] travaux publics et du garage municipal. Madame
la greffière. Donc, le contenu de votre
[2:02:17] rapport ou le dépôt. Il y a eu cinq signatures
sur le. Sur un total de 14 017 requises, donc.
[2:02:26] 1004 117 400 Oui, donc, c'est un dépôt item
Or, idem pour 10.6. Deposit by the city clerk
[2:02:36] Office of the certificate regarding the result
of an application to participate in
[2:02:41] the referendum Paul held march, thirty first
and the first twenty twenty six concerning
[2:02:47] bylaw by one by one. Entitled bylaw authorizing
alone fifteen point one million dollar for
[2:02:53] the construction of a multipurpose cultural
center before grants and private
[2:02:58] contributions. Alors il s'agit d'un dépôt.
It's the deposit. Madame la greffière. Madame,
Il
[2:03:03] y avait 30 signatures. Merci. Section 45 Urbanisme
Urban Planning Items 45.1 Demande de
[2:03:12] dérogation mineure pour la propriété. Take
it from here. Okay. Situé au 472 Coronet.
[2:03:20] Pardon. So just before you take moving turning
the corner. It's been a long meeting tonight.
So
[2:03:25] thanks for everybody at home staging with us.
It's been a long but of product of building.
[2:03:29] So this sport gets a little bit tedious will
be voting on individual items. The next
[2:03:33] section is really about those who submitted
project for home renovation these these types
of
[2:03:39] things, so will be going through the one by
one just to and then we'll be turning the
[2:03:43] corner and the final stretch just just to keep
everybody. There. Alors so for the urban
[2:03:48] planning section. Comme vous l'avez dit, Monsieur
le Maire. 45.1 C'est la demande de
[2:03:53] dérogation mineure pour la propriété située.
472 Coronet. La recommandation, c'est
[2:04:01] d'approuver ceux qui sont en faveur. Vous proposez,
vous proposez. Est-ce que j'ai
[2:04:05] quelqu'un qui se. Alors, en faveur. You with
me good. Yes! And now IDM forty five points
[2:04:13] two. Approuvé par unanimité. Forty five point
two is a request for approval of the
[2:04:20] side planning and architectural integration
programs the s p i p related to relating to
the
[2:04:27] building permit application to modify the already
approved plan that sixty five heaven and
[2:04:31] the recommendations to us approved. Proposed
propose un second. Approved and then item
[2:04:44] 45.3. 45.3 C'est la demande d'approbation du
plan d'implantation et d'intégration
[2:04:48] architecturale. Puis il y a relatif à la demande
d'un permis pour une construction,
[2:04:52] pour la modification d'un plan déjà approuvé
au 185 Lake View. La recommandation, c'est
[2:04:59] d'approuver selon, selon, option à ceux qui
sont en faveur. Oui, selon l'option A.
[2:05:07] Et est ce que vous avez une autre proposition
à formuler? Mais je pense pas avoir besoin
[2:05:13] de voter sur ça en premier. Alors ceux en
faveur d'approuver ou de ou seconder.
[2:05:21] Merci madame la conseillère Gaudin. C'est
vrai qu'il commence à se faire tard. Oui,
[2:05:27] Donc ceux qui sont en faveur d'approuver la
recommandation du CCU. D'accord. Donc, ceux
[2:05:37] qui sont contre. Excellent. Maintenant, Monsieur
le conseiller Newel, avez vous une
[2:05:43] proposition à faire pour cet item là? Oui,
en fait, disons que j'aimerais reproposer à
[2:05:47] nouveau la proposition qui reflète l'option
B dans les dans les soumissions par le
[2:05:54] résident, ce qui a été soumis le 27 mars
2026, qui était finalement la réunion du
CCG
[2:05:59] qui a eu lieu à cette date là. Donc j'aimerais
proposer l'option B. Je seconde l'option
[2:06:06] B. Vous appuyer alors en faveur de la proposition
du conseiller New World, d'accorder selon
[2:06:14] l'option B. Voilà, tout le monde est en faveur.
Excellente option B. Merci. Getting there
[2:06:22] for request for the approval of the sight planning
and architectural integration
[2:06:26] programs relating to the building permits application
for the modification of the
[2:06:30] side of the building located at the lake shore.
The recommandation is to approuve.
[2:06:39] Easy. Alors, 45,5, c'est la demande d'approbation
du plan d'implantation et d'intégration
[2:06:48] architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis
de construction pour
[2:06:51] l'agrandissement d'un bâtiment principal situé
au 228 Allan Croft Crescent. Le
[2:06:57] recommandation, c'est d'approuver. Je seconde
en faveur. Excellent. Ensuite,
[2:07:08] donc, the next one is a forty-five point six
and this is a request for approval of
[2:07:13] the sight. Planning architectural integration
programs relating to the
[2:07:16] building permit application for the modification
of the façades of the building located at
[2:07:21] forty-five sweet brailler. The recommendation
is to refuse and the plan revised plans were
not
[2:07:31] submitted on time. So the recommendation is
to refuse un second. Refusing. Non, en fait,
[2:07:43] la recommandation était d'accepter, à condition
que les nouveaux plans soient reçus.
[2:07:50] Les nouveaux plans n'ont pas été reçus,
donc on rejette la recommandation non pas parce
[2:07:56] qu'on ne l'aime pas, mais bien parce que la
condition n'a pas été rencontrée. Exact.
Alors,
[2:08:01] en faveur du rejet de la recommandation, le
deuxième souffle, alors là, là, là, là,
[2:08:07] là, on n'a. OK. Monsieur le conseiller, nous
avez vous une recommandation à formuler pour
[2:08:14] ce projet là? Et oui, et oui. Voilà. Oui.
Donc pour. Item 45.40 5.6 on, on propose la
[2:08:25] recommandation option B telle que proposée
par le résident également durant le meeting
de
[2:08:32] suivi, le 27 mars 2026, on propose. Option
B tel que proposé. Seconde. Alors, en
[2:08:40] faveur d'accorder la demande d'autorisation
en fonction de l'option B. Excellent. Ouf!
[2:08:51] 47.5 45.7 45 point Alright. And in their. Demande
Approbation du plan d'implantation
[2:09:01] d'interaction avec Tectural relatif à la demande
d'un permis de construction pour la
[2:09:04] modification d'un plan déjà approuvé au
cinq Claude. La recommandation est de refuser.
[2:09:11] Je seconde en faveur. Excellent! Et on continue?
Oui. 45.8 Recours à 45.8 Request for the
[2:09:26] approval of the planning and architectural
integration program. Relating to the
[2:09:29] building permits application for the extension
of the building located at fourteen
[2:09:33] madson. The recommendation is to refuse un
second en faveur. Salam. Oui. 45.9 Pardon.
45.9
[2:09:47] Demande d'approbation du Plan d'implantation
et d'intégration architecturale relatif à
la
[2:09:51] demande d'un permis de construction pour l'agrandissement
d'un bâtiment
[2:09:55] principal situé au 116 Field vers. La recommandation,
c'est de refuser. Je seconde en
[2:10:03] faveur la recommandation. 25 dix 45 dix. The
request for the approval of the sight planning
[2:10:11] and natural integration programs relating to
the building permit application for
[2:10:15] the extension of the building located at one
fifty six Lincoln. The recommandation is
[2:10:19] to refuse. Un sac in favour of the recommandation.
Excellent. Okay. Merci. Merci. Ressources
[2:10:32] humaines. Human Resources Fifty point One 50.1.
Je propose la nomination en vue de permanence
[2:10:39] à titre de chef de division urbanisme et permis
au poste sept un zéro sept. En. Okay.
[2:10:56] Fifty one point, one of acting for the month
of may June July and August Twenty twenty six.
[2:11:10] Propose. Thank you. And so this would be for
the treatment of councillor l'éveillé as
acting
[2:11:17] mayor for the next for months. I'll be away
for two and a half of those for months and
[2:11:23] counselor level. Good luck all in favor. Yeah!
Hum. Committee. 53.1 53.1 Donc back to me donc
[2:11:43] these are the meaning of the planning advisory
committee. All just we just want to all
[2:11:47] the project. So I don't have a lot of other
things specifically about it, but a
[2:11:52] reminder for those. Lorsque vous avez soumis
un projet, ou une construction, rénovation
ou
[2:11:59] quoi que ce soit, s'il vous plaît, si jamais
en cours de route que vous voyez vos plans
[2:12:04] dirigent un petit peu selon les plans approuvés,
s'il vous plaît soyez conscient et soyez
[2:12:10] prudent. Elle vise toujours la ville lorsqu'il
y a des changements que vous voyez
[2:12:14] actuellement dans vos plans. Anytime you're
doing a renovation where you are saying
[2:12:20] perhaps changes to the plan or the contractor
suggesting something different from an
[2:12:25] approved plan from the city, please and if
you agree with those changes, please bring
[2:12:30] that to the city. Attention because otherwise
at the end when the inspection is done it
[2:12:34] usually leads to some problems and projects
in all things are rectified. So it's important
[2:12:39] that basically I'm saying is that when you
have approved plan for your permis stick to
[2:12:42] the plan if you feel that the deviation is
needed, please bring it to the city attention,
[2:12:48] so that can be dealt with at the time, because
it is difficult to to deal with
[2:12:53] things after they built and then try to make
them the way they're supposed to be. So it's
[2:12:58] just a little bit of this helpful advice. If
you're in that situation, please keep in
[2:13:02] mind if you have something project the next
meeting. La prochaine réunion va avoir lieu
[2:13:06] le 28 avril, donc prochainement. Donc, nous
allons réviser un autre groupe de projet à
cette
[2:13:11] date là. Donc je propose des les deux minutes,
le procès verbal, je seconde en faveur.
[2:13:21] Five points to Yes. So I proposed the meaning
of the finance advisory committee
[2:13:28] meeting of march sixteen twenty twenty six
and make some comment where you want to vote
[2:13:37] or well your second thing. Excuse me. Yes!
Absolutely, I will love to go ahead. So I
[2:13:47] will not go through the full. The full meet
in mind, but I will read verbatim if if you
[2:13:56] don't mind one of the bullets, it's regarding
new revenus. Revenus so nouveaux revenus.
[2:14:06] Une discussion a été entamée en vue de prévoir
des nouveaux types de revenus, comme des
[2:14:13] nouveaux développements, des taxes éco fiscales
ou un panneau électronique
[2:14:19] autoroutière. Les membres du comité commentent
différents aspects de ces nouveaux revenus.
[2:14:25] L'augmentation du nombre de commerces sur le
territoire de la ville serait également
[2:14:29] encouragée. Il est mentionné que la Ville
entreprendre une démarche de consultation
[2:14:36] publique sur l'aménagement du territoire,
ainsi qu'une démarche de planification
[2:14:40] stratégique. So just want to point out that
again as a council through the finance
[2:14:46] committee, and then again as this body of elected
official we are looking at ways to
[2:14:53] generate new revenus. Okay. That's it. Thank
you. Thank you. 53.3. 53.3 C'est le procès
[2:15:07] verbal de la réunion du Comité consultatif
de circulation, qui a eu un meeting qui a eu
lieu
[2:15:11] le 27, réunion qui a eu lieu le 27 mars. Just
give since we have it had a really update on
[2:15:17] the traffic situation in a while we had our
first meeting by the way is called presented
[2:15:22] by myself and the council. Rossi, I was at
this particular meeting, so I have a couple
of
[2:15:28] point it just to bring I thought that be trois
points. Actually I think that are
[2:15:34] compelling enough is enough and impact a large
area of the city to bring up. So the number
of
[2:15:41] points. WE had like different points to the
agenda and by way of an introduction to the
[2:15:45] traffic advisory committee meets generally
between may march and november during the
[2:15:49] period of time every month and every two months
depending on the agenda and we have
[2:15:53] residents on the committee and we basically
deal with the trafic issue that comes through
[2:15:58] our our previous. So there was I'm just gonna
select a few days before they seem to have
[2:16:03] the highest magnitude so one of them one of
the items which there are number of points
that
[2:16:09] were brought up by the topic was the race around
the trafic, circulation that saint Charles
[2:16:13] and highway twenty the underpass so the infamous
underpass. So for example,
[2:16:18] there was grouping some of the common causes
are numerous. I'm just putting them into the
[2:16:23] group. So you understand the scope of what
was brought in this time around so for example
[2:16:27] the left line turn when going saint-charles
south and the highway twenty that would be
[2:16:32] going up to Montreal up to the eastbound. So
try to find the improvement there the improved
[2:16:37] white marking if you're coming the most obvious
when you're coming down the the the down
[2:16:43] ramp going east and turning up the saint-charles
north. You know you have the sword of the
[2:16:47] dead lines that are there when the weather
time so much what you see is trying to improve
[2:16:52] the lines of some of the lines to cross. It
can be confusing for some, so we're looking
at
[2:16:57] that as well the light sequencing, there's
issues regarding the issues, but
[2:17:02] looking at how to improve that as much as possible
and and these and other items will be
[2:17:09] dealt with more comprehensively because actually
tonight, we actually past if you been here
[2:17:13] the whole night is so that we past the request
for budget to do a specific and I would say
[2:17:19] more focused traffic study in the particular
area and good things and talking with our
[2:17:24] public works today that should be happening.
Thanks to council's approval of it in the
[2:17:29] month of may. So what you want to get it more
data to deal with it. Don't have a lot of
[2:17:34] a-ha moments right here for that underpass,
but it provides some insurance that we've
[2:17:38] received a lot of feed back from that as well
and we felt that there's a very specific
[2:17:42] study that we want to do with traffic related
to come up with a little bit more robust
[2:17:47] information that we currently have in the area
needless to say we have we did receive a
[2:17:52] post-collision from the SPVM, and we are working
to implement some of those things now with
[2:17:57] some of the things we can't do so for example,
if you have been down to as a pedestrian.
[2:18:02] For example, if you've been down to the underpass
under saint Charles and the twenty
[2:18:07] there's somebody from the audience giving us
a thumbs up so hopefully have been there
[2:18:10] and seeing what I'm talking about what we've
done there for the time being is what we've
[2:18:15] done. Essentially is one of the recommendations
ways to improve access for pedestrian. So
[2:18:19] before you, you saw button, You would you press
the button in your request circle around and
[2:18:25] you can cross right now. What we've done essentially.
It's just time in the crosswalk
[2:18:32] automatically than the leading sequence, so
when you get there and there's a sign that
[2:18:35] explains that in fact, there's two signs and
around the corner, which kind of explains.
What's
[2:18:40] new about it? So if you're pedestrians and
going under the underpass on the corner. You
[2:18:44] arrived there. It is great you with the sign.
It gives you a sense of what's going on? And
[2:18:48] you just wait your turn and then you'll see
it. It will flash the time you have and
[2:18:53] then you cross, and then you got you don't
have to do this. On demande, on demande. And
to
[2:18:57] the fact, you will be removing the button.
So that option it's not confusing anybody to
think
[2:19:02] you would do that for there's no pressing any
button. It's just time into the sequence. So
[2:19:06] that is just take this whole and managing expectations
number one about what
[2:19:11] pedestrians CAN I speak to do And I've been
down. There are like that myself. You don't
[2:19:15] have to wait that long to cross. So that's
a good thing. So the little things like that
and
[2:19:20] maybe not as obvious the driver. But those
things are being done the other thing. We've
done
[2:19:24] with the earlier. Just as a reminder. WE also
asked for you know a red light radar to be
[2:19:30] locked into that area and even more grandioses.
I would say project we're looking at even
[2:19:36] designing that whole underpass at least having
a look at that to see it that can be done.
[2:19:42] That's it all the scope of the menu, but it's
it's all related to that underpass, which is
of
[2:19:46] high profile and everybody certainly has an
opinion about what's going on here there? So
[2:19:50] here is that we will be looking further when
we get this traffic study and look forward
[2:19:54] to bring further recommendations that we go
forward over the summer, you're
[2:19:57] not item. Qui est soulevé. C'est Une visière
a été installé aux feux de
[2:20:02] circulation à l'intersection du boulevard
Beaconsfield et de la rue Saint-Charles, donc
proche
[2:20:05] de l'église, afin de réduire la vitesse à
l'approche et d'empêcher les conducteurs
[2:20:11] d'accélérer pour passer la lumière. Donc
de loin. You're not gonna be able to see
[2:20:16] whether you are going to make the yellow or
make the make the light from a distance. So
[2:20:20] you're speed up through the school zone. So
we are actually done this. This is it. So you
[2:20:25] can't really tell and tell you that much closer
the idea that behind that is not in any way
[2:20:30] it simply there to reduce the reduce the temptations
to try and speed up and make it light
[2:20:35] is there. You are going to go the speed limit
focus on that and drive it like you'll see
it
[2:20:40] in time to decide what you should be doing
when you see the lights configuration. So
[2:20:44] it's done there for safety reasons. D'autres
points à l'ordre du jour sont entraînés
[2:20:49] en train plutôt des études de circulation
de certaines de nos rues résidentielles. Il
y a
[2:20:54] plus de demandes de nos résidents, mais ça
implique une étude de circulation avant
[2:20:57] qu'on peut conclure avec une recommandation.
Donc, de sorte que ces recommandations futures
[2:21:04] seront présentées sur ces points. Un fois,
toutes les inventions sont seront
[2:21:09] disponibles lors de la prochaine réunion,
ce printemps ou durant l'été. Including I'll
[2:21:15] just say that the traffic as I said before
the traffic meeting meets trafic committee
meets
[2:21:19] between March November. If residents do have
a crest request to make traffic related
[2:21:25] they can email the email. Le courriel c'est
si, si, c'est à Beaconsfield, Arkham City
[2:21:31] Arkham Asylum, beaconsfield ca. Donc ccc at
Beaconsfield point. C is the way to reach the
[2:21:37] traffic committee for any kind of traffic issues
that you would like us to address and
[2:21:42] the next meeting will be on may twenty seconds
so hopefully. À ce moment-là, à partir du
mois
[2:21:46] de juin, Monsieur le Maire, on espère avoir
un peu plus d'informations à partager sur
[2:21:50] le comité. Merci pour votre merci. Merci pour
le temps. Est ce que j'ai quelqu'un qui
[2:21:55] appuie? Make you all in favor? Could IDM fifty
trois points for. Just before we presented
[2:22:09] at the environment committee. I would just
like to underline that we've just at the
[2:22:15] resignation on the committee, Miss Catherine
decided to step down and she is moving out
to
[2:22:21] the out of the city. So I just like to underline
her her work on the the committee
[2:22:29] particularly the pollinator gardens that will
be made this summer. It's a wonderful
[2:22:34] project that is bringing the community together
and she helped to spread it. So thank
[2:22:40] you, we wish for all the best in her future
endeavors. So fifty for the environmental
[2:22:48] advisory committee February twenty twenty six.
Something about the ok. So all in favor.
[2:23:06] 6.1 60.1. Autorisation de la fermeture complète
de rues pour l'événement. Marché pour chaque
[2:23:15] vendredi du 29 mai au 11 septembre 2026, de
2 h à De 14 h à 18 h 30. Je propose. 60.2
[2:23:31] Sixty point two authorization for the friends
of power Privileged organized the
[2:23:36] community. Big boss in the de Beaurepaire village
on Saturday night, Twenty twenty six from
[2:23:42] Ten am PM and authorization for full street
closure of Field Field. North of Beaconsfield
[2:23:49] Boulevard y propose. 60.3. Merci. Autorisation
de tenir l'événement émetteur Radio
[2:24:01] Field Day au Parc Centennial du samedi 27 juin
au dimanche 28 juin 2026. Je propose. Je.
[2:24:10] Seconde en faveur. 60.46 Point fort propose
the autorisation the project to renovate and
[2:24:22] upgraded the recreation center for City Lane
and Beaconsfield, the Ministry of Education
under
[2:24:27] the programme d'aide financière aux infractions.
Infrastructures récréatives,
[2:24:34] sportives et de plein air. A first pas y second.
So this is. Absolutely because this is one
[2:24:46] example of how the amount that we intend to
pay for the renovation of the recreation
[2:24:54] center could be positively impacted if we were
to get a grant, and so everybody should
[2:25:01] keep their fingers crossed so all in favour.
Items. 60.5 Autorisation de présenter le
[2:25:13] projet de reconstruction de la piscine extérieure
au parc Windermere, incluant le
[2:25:19] Pavillon des Baigneurs et le chalet du Parc
au 323 Windermere Beaconsfield. Dans
[2:25:25] le cadre du Programme d'aide financière aux
infrastructures récréatifs, sportives et
de
[2:25:31] plein air. Le pas fier Espa, je propose juste
le Land. Our fingers crossed for that one
[2:25:42] two all in favor. Item 60,6 6,6 et résolution
resolution Recognising Sixteenth as
[2:25:55] international Celiac Disease Awareness Day
y propose that one. Alors 60.7. Il s'agit d'un
[2:26:09] dépôt dépôt du rapport 20 24 sur la gestion
de l'eau potable pour la ville de Beaconsfield,
[2:26:13] approuvé par le ministère des Affaires municipales
et de l'Habitation. Et le prochain
[2:26:18] item également est un rapport. Rapport du
maire. Or Report on the decision made by the
[2:26:24] Agglomération Council and its meeting of march,
twenty twenty twenty six, the big ticket
[2:26:31] items that that last council or agglo Council
meeting were related to protective equipment
[2:26:38] for the firefighters and also the award of
a contract for the maintenance repair and upkeep
[2:26:46] of the matériel roulant. Everything that has
wheels cars vehicles of all kinds of sortes,
[2:26:54] so and the next agglo council meeting is this
coming Thursday, There's nothing specific to
the
[2:27:02] West Island on the agenda again, major investment
and parks and recreation around the island,
[2:27:13] Parc du Mont-Royal, parc Maisonneuve and such.
Items. 80.1. Dépôt des rapports des
[2:27:24] directeurs. Monsieur le Directeur général,
voulez vous ajouter un mot? Oui, je vais
[2:27:28] essayer d'être bref parce que le temps file.
Merci Monsieur le Maire. Donc oui, on a trois
[2:27:34] rapports qui ont été déposés au Conseil.
Les permis émis au service d'urbanisme, le
rapport
[2:27:40] du centre de répartition sur les appels reçus
par les citoyens, principalement en
[2:27:45] dehors des heures de travail, ainsi que le
visionnement des séances du Conseil. J'aimerais
[2:27:51] rajouter un mot, surtout avec que c'est un
nouveau conseil qui arrive au printemps, et
[2:27:55] souvent les attentes sont élevées pour que
la propreté de la ville soit fait avec Ginny
[2:28:00] en un clin d'oeil. Mais ça ne fonctionne malheureusement
pas comme ça. Mais nos travaux
[2:28:04] publics travaillent fort. On essaie de rendre
les terrains, les terrains de tennis
[2:28:08] disponibles pour le 1eʳ mai. C'est une date
qu'on vise à chaque année. On a quand même
[2:28:14] un printemps tardif, là. Je sais pas ce que
ça va faire sur nos travaux printaniers, par
[2:28:18] exemple, comme le marquage de chaussées. On
souhaite toujours que ce soit fait pour la
fin
[2:28:22] juin. Si la température est pas au rendez
vous. C'est plus difficile quand il pleut de
[2:28:26] faire de la peinture. On vise la propreté
pour la fin juin, début de l'été donc 21
juin 30
[2:28:32] juin maximum. Tourbe. Parfois, les gens se
posent la question pourquoi on n'a pas installé
la
[2:28:37] tourbe encore? Mais c'est rarement disponible
avant la grande fin de semaine du mois
[2:28:41] de mai. Parce que les tourbières, les terrains
sont saturés d'eau et tout véhicule
[2:28:46] qui pourrait aller chercher la tourbe, il va
endommager plus que de la rendre disponible.
[2:28:52] Donc, on demande aux citoyens d'être patients,
évidemment, d'essayer de comprendre cette
[2:28:56] dynamique là. C'est pas toujours évident.
Même s'il fait beau et chaud depuis une
[2:28:59] semaine, ça ne veut pas dire que les terrains
sont encore assez secs pour recevoir la
[2:29:03] tourbe. Les travaux de réparation d'asphalte
dans les rues, par exemple, pour les
[2:29:07] bris d'aqueduc divers et les égouts bouchés
qu'on a du. Excusez-moi, réparer les
[2:29:15] travaux vont se faire bientôt avec de l'asphalte
chaude, mais à ce temps-ci de l'année,
[2:29:20] évidemment, on est contraint par les règles
de dégel des routes, donc, on est limité
[2:29:27] dans la capacité de faire ces travaux là
à cause des poids des véhicules à circuler
sur
[2:29:33] les routes. Et évidemment, on entend beaucoup
parler des inondations. Nous suivons la
[2:29:38] situation de près. ICI à Beaconsfield, on
est peu à risque, mais on a quand même un
[2:29:42] plan particulier d'intervention où on a identifié
dix résidences depuis 2019 environ.
[2:29:47] Et à chaque printemps, on communique avec
ces résidences là pour leur offrir des sacs
de
[2:29:51] sable le cas échéant. On a des rencontres
régulières avec le service, avec l'agglomération
[2:29:56] de Montréal, le Centre de services civils
ainsi que des rapports quotidiens qui nous
[2:30:00] sont transmis pour connaître. On est informé
de l'ensemble de la situation sur l'île. Voilà,
[2:30:06] Monsieur le Maire. Merci, Monsieur le Directeur
général. Alors, nous n'avons pas
[2:30:11] d'affaires nouvelles No new business. Nous
sommes à la levée de la séance. Sommes nous
[2:30:17] prêts? Are you ready with one by one last
thing? One last thing on a light are not go
[2:30:22] habs. Go. Go habs. Go. Yes. Yes. Yes. For sure.
Yes. Alright. Do I have? Je propose. And all
in
[2:30:33] favor. Yes. So this concludes our council Municipal
council meeting of April. Are we still
[2:30:43] on the Twentieth? Yes April twenty twenty twenty
six. Je vous remercie à tous et à
[2:30:50] toutes d'être encore ici présents dans la
salle. And if you are at home watching us.
[2:30:55] Thank you very much for being with us. It's
greatly appreciated. À la semaine
[2:31:00] prochaine. Non, c'est pas vrai. Au mois prochain
et le mois prochain, la séance du conseil
[2:31:04] est le 19 mai. Le mardi, en raison de la fête
des Patriotes. Or, if you prefer Victoria they.
[2:31:14] Merci.