1 00:03:00,560 --> 00:03:08,000 So I guess we'll call the meeting to order. Um starting with the 2 00:03:06,239 --> 00:03:10,879 acknowledgement of treaties of peace and friendship. 3 00:03:09,519 --> 00:03:14,239 We would like to begin by acknowledging that the land on which we gather is the 4 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:17,920 traditional unseated territory of the Mcmack peoples. This territory is 5 00:03:16,640 --> 00:03:22,959 covered by the treaties of peace and friendship which Maliset Mcmack and 6 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:27,280 Pasoquati peoples first signed with the British crown in 1726. The treaties did 7 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:32,159 not deal with the surrender of lands and resources but in fact recognized Mcmack 8 00:03:29,920 --> 00:03:36,319 and Malice title and established the rules for what was to be an ongoing 9 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:41,519 relationship between nations. Next one is our oath of office. We do 10 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:45,280 hereby accept the office of counsel and will diligently, faithfully, and 11 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:51,519 impartially discharge to the best of our ability the duties of the office as may 12 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:56,319 be imposed upon us by law. And we'll move on to number two, 13 00:03:53,920 --> 00:04:02,400 adoption of the agenda. Is there any additions or deletions? 14 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:10,920 If not, we'll move to motion. >> Motion 109 that the agenda be adopted as 15 00:04:04,879 --> 00:04:10,920 presented. Could I get a mover 16 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:14,360 seconder? 17 00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:22,479 » I'll second. >> Any questions to the motion. 18 00:04:20,479 --> 00:04:27,479 All those in favor signify by raising your hand. Motion carried. 19 00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:37,759 Any statements of conflict of interest? None. 20 00:04:35,919 --> 00:04:45,160 So, no presentations, petitions, or delegations. We'll move into number five 21 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:45,160 business starting with 5.1. 22 00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:54,800 » Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Okay. So, uh we're hopefully going to be able to uh 23 00:04:51,199 --> 00:05:00,479 finalize our uh procedural bylaw here. Um so, you've all been provided with a a 24 00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:06,639 copy of the latest clean version um of the uh of the bylaw. So, we'll work off 25 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:09,759 of that. Um the uh only feedback that that administration really received we 26 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:15,440 got some feedback from Brenda on it so we'll can kind of work through I I don't 27 00:05:11,520 --> 00:05:18,800 think we need to um there is a a lot as we progress through it but it's more 28 00:05:17,039 --> 00:05:22,400 kind of administrative type stuff just sort of clean up and and uh that type of 29 00:05:21,039 --> 00:05:25,440 thing. So there is some discussion that we need and some direction that we need 30 00:05:23,759 --> 00:05:28,639 but I think the best thing to do is kind of run through the the whole thing. 31 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:34,160 We'll go through it relatively quickly and just take a look at some of the uh 32 00:05:30,479 --> 00:05:38,080 suggested changes that were made. Um, so no changes made on the first page. On 33 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:43,120 page one, everything there seems to be in order. Page two, uh, we do have some 34 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:47,520 cleanup on the table of contents. So, we've got that and we can make those, 35 00:05:45,120 --> 00:05:53,520 uh, those are just going to match the, um, uh, the items that we added down the 36 00:05:50,400 --> 00:06:00,840 page. So, we have um item P will be the repeal, Q will be enactment, and item R 37 00:05:56,880 --> 00:06:00,840 is going to be for review. 38 00:06:02,639 --> 00:06:12,720 Um outside of that, we're into um definitions on page two and there was no 39 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:17,680 changes there. We can move on to item page three. 40 00:06:15,280 --> 00:06:22,400 Uh was suggested changes around emergency meetings. Um so it referenced 41 00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:27,360 a section which is uh correct that shouldn't really be. There's a lot of 42 00:06:23,919 --> 00:06:32,080 4.1s in here. So we'll specify section E in emergency meeting. So emergency 43 00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:37,039 meeting means a meeting convened pursuant to section E meetings of 44 00:06:34,479 --> 00:06:41,574 council emergency meetings is how we'll do that rather than having 4.1 45 00:06:39,554 --> 00:06:41,574 [snorts] 46 00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:49,960 outside of that. No other changes on page three. 47 00:06:52,720 --> 00:07:02,440 No changes identified on page four. So everything on page four will remain the 48 00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:02,440 same. 49 00:07:05,759 --> 00:07:12,639 No changes made on page five. Everything there will remain the same along the way 50 00:07:11,199 --> 00:07:15,680 here. Council, if anyone has anything, if jumps out, we're we're looking at 51 00:07:14,319 --> 00:07:20,000 this. If there's something on page five that you want to address, just let us 52 00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:23,680 know. But um the the most uh recent version that we 53 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:27,039 have on this has no changes, so it's page five. 54 00:07:26,060 --> 00:07:34,560 » [snorts] >> Page six, no changes suggested, so 55 00:07:31,199 --> 00:07:40,280 everything would stay the same. Okay. On page seven, there was a couple 56 00:07:36,479 --> 00:07:40,280 recommendations made. 57 00:07:41,039 --> 00:07:50,240 Um, so there was a suggestion um in item 58 00:07:47,120 --> 00:07:55,599 number one, meetings of council. Uh, the first one uh is a little preamble to in 59 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:59,520 a first sentence. A newly elected council shall hold its first formal 60 00:07:57,759 --> 00:08:04,639 meeting on the day prescribed by the local governance act uh added in as a 61 00:08:02,400 --> 00:08:08,560 sentence prior to a newly elected council. 62 00:08:07,325 --> 00:08:13,280 [snorts] Outside of that, at the end of item 63 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:17,599 number one, a suggestion made that the clerk is responsible for administering 64 00:08:15,599 --> 00:08:21,599 administering the oath of office to newly elected council members. 65 00:08:20,319 --> 00:08:24,160 » And actually, just to point that out, that's right in the legislation. 66 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:30,319 » Yeah. And this Yeah, this is right from the legislation. Yeah. Uh 67 00:08:27,759 --> 00:08:34,080 following that, the first formal meeting of council [snorts] 68 00:08:32,159 --> 00:08:38,399 after a quadranial election shall be held not later than the 15th day of June 69 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:43,880 following the council's election. again right from the uh legislation with that. 70 00:08:47,279 --> 00:08:56,080 Um what we might be able to do I could probably um share my screen so that 71 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:59,760 council can see I know that Brenda sent this out already but should I do that? 72 00:08:58,480 --> 00:09:02,080 Should I share my screen just so you guys can see the wording that's 73 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:04,966 suggested? >> Sure. 74 00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:06,986 » Sure. Okay. One second here. [snorts and clears throat] 75 00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:28,440 Can we see this kind of 76 00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:38,079 » So, here's the suggested changes. A newly elected council shall hold its 77 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:42,079 first formal meeting on the day prescribed in the local governance act 78 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:45,680 followed uh the sentence at the end. The clerk is responsible for administering 79 00:10:43,839 --> 00:10:49,360 the administering the oath of office oaths of office to newly elected council 80 00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:53,279 members and the first formal meeting of council after a quadrronial election 81 00:10:51,279 --> 00:10:57,279 shall be held not later than the 15th day of June following the council's 82 00:10:54,800 --> 00:11:00,839 election. all from the legislation. 83 00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:11,079 Okay. So then there was a suggestion on item five. Um 84 00:11:12,079 --> 00:11:20,000 so this is referencing the the electronically um televised uh 85 00:11:17,839 --> 00:11:23,200 component. So it doesn't uh Brenda made a note that it doesn't address the 86 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:26,079 public recording meeting. So I don't know Brenda if you want to touch on 87 00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:30,959 that. Well, I think we talked about this initially and at that time there seemed 88 00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:35,040 to be the majority or most of council felt that they had no objection to 89 00:11:33,519 --> 00:11:41,120 somebody in the public recording it because ours is the official recording 90 00:11:37,279 --> 00:11:45,600 regardless. So this just more or less uh refers to television or 91 00:11:42,959 --> 00:11:50,320 telecommunications company. So that whole question I don't know if we need 92 00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:57,320 to clarify it in there that anybody and whatever but I know it was discussed and 93 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:57,320 some felt it wasn't a problem. 94 00:11:57,888 --> 00:12:04,880 [snorts] I don't have an issue with people recording our our meetings. Um I 95 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:10,800 would include something here about us posting to 96 00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:16,000 uh our YouTube channel. That's a if it's in the bylaw, it's required so that 97 00:12:12,800 --> 00:12:20,480 people have access to the meetings and I I don't I don't know what the live 98 00:12:17,839 --> 00:12:25,200 streaming issue is. I know we we are constantly [snorts] but [clears throat] 99 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:29,440 » Yeah. So, and and that's a good point. So, like as of just as an example, right 100 00:12:27,680 --> 00:12:36,079 now we can't live stream. they've got an an IT ticket open through our service 101 00:12:31,760 --> 00:12:39,839 provider on the live stream um to uh little device that that connects to 102 00:12:37,920 --> 00:12:43,920 YouTube [snorts] completely out of our hands. And the only from from the staff 103 00:12:42,560 --> 00:12:48,720 side, the only reason I would be hesitant to do something like this is 104 00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:54,320 that it's it's not stipulated by legislation that we have to stream or 105 00:12:51,040 --> 00:13:00,720 that we if we put it in here, we do. Um, but if something like this happens where 106 00:12:56,560 --> 00:13:04,720 it's kind of out of the control um uh of uh of Bel Dune that we can't live 107 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:06,880 stream, I I don't know what kind of if you're creating more issues down the 108 00:13:06,079 --> 00:13:12,240 road. >> No, but if that's what I'm saying is is 109 00:13:09,279 --> 00:13:16,000 if it's not included in here that it's live streamed, we're still recording and 110 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:20,560 the the meetings are still posted to YouTube. And I think I think it's 111 00:13:17,839 --> 00:13:24,399 important that we continue to post the recordings to YouTube. So if something 112 00:13:22,480 --> 00:13:26,880 is included in the procedural bylaw that meetings will be posted to YouTube. 113 00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:28,880 » Yeah. >> Then 114 00:13:27,360 --> 00:13:32,880 » yeah, that's a good point. Yeah. The the live stream and actually just real quick 115 00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:36,959 in our last conversation you had mentioned something about there being an 116 00:13:34,399 --> 00:13:41,519 item in there about uh a residual thing from COVID which was accurate. Yeah, we 117 00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:47,200 went back and uh when we were when co just so council was aware there was a 118 00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:51,839 catch in in this where um when there the public was not allowed to be here um 119 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:56,320 municipalities were allowed to have their council meetings um you know 120 00:13:54,320 --> 00:14:01,360 contained but they had to put in the agenda where people could go to to be 121 00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:04,639 able to to see it and hear it. So that was uh something that was raised during 122 00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:07,920 the last session. So yeah. So you want to add something in here just around the 123 00:14:06,079 --> 00:14:12,399 YouTube uploading to YouTube >> and basically we could say that that's 124 00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:14,720 the official municipal >> okay 125 00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:19,199 » record or some sort because even though somebody else records it and then they 126 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:24,399 cut it and paste do whatever they can >> that's what I was going to say I I am 127 00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:29,360 opposed to it being recorded if we're not live stream 128 00:14:26,639 --> 00:14:34,720 » because as your point is that's exactly the point I was going to make is that 129 00:14:31,199 --> 00:14:36,880 we're not live stream or that it can up uplifted to YouTube, 130 00:14:36,320 --> 00:14:42,720 » right? >> Anything can be recorded and manipulated 131 00:14:39,680 --> 00:14:47,440 in how we said it. So, uh, if we're if we're not if we're not ha having it on 132 00:14:45,120 --> 00:14:48,560 YouTube, I would be opposed to recording. 133 00:14:48,079 --> 00:14:53,199 » Okay. >> So, that's why I say we can say that's 134 00:14:50,079 --> 00:14:57,380 the official recorded record. That's the municipal's official record, legal 135 00:14:55,440 --> 00:15:01,279 record, you know, whatever wording, but [snorts] and and we'll be up. It will be 136 00:14:59,680 --> 00:15:06,240 posted on YouTube. If it's not live streamed, it'll get there a day or two 137 00:15:03,440 --> 00:15:10,480 later, whatever, but it will be up. >> Okay. So, so yeah, we don't we don't 138 00:15:08,639 --> 00:15:14,000 need to set a date for when it would be on YouTube. We're just saying it will be 139 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:16,880 on YouTube. We're going to be adding it. Um, okay. So, that this is going to be 140 00:15:15,680 --> 00:15:22,639 an item five. So, what we're going to do is we're going to include language uh 141 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:28,959 along the lines of um council meetings will be uploaded to the uh official 142 00:15:26,480 --> 00:15:37,440 village of Beldune YouTube channel and will uh be considered the official 143 00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:39,440 um digital recording uh something along those lines. 144 00:15:38,160 --> 00:15:42,800 » Would you call it uploaded or would probably be Is there a difference 145 00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:45,920 between uploaded and streamed? >> Yeah, [snorts] stream means you're doing 146 00:15:44,079 --> 00:15:50,240 it live. Stre stream generally means that you're doing it live. Yeah. Whereas 147 00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:53,680 uploading Yeah. Uh I just uploaded all of our We've had previous meetings 148 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:57,040 around this. So I've just uploaded all of those. We haven't we didn't stream 149 00:15:55,040 --> 00:15:59,040 them. So they're all on YouTube now. Uh and so that's just 150 00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:02,399 » that's because I don't want to be up that stream without a paddle. 151 00:16:00,399 --> 00:16:10,160 » That's right. That's exactly what it is. >> I I would probably add to that it would 152 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:11,920 be the um official unedited recording. >> Yeah. 153 00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:17,199 » Okay. Yeah, that's a good point too. What we were what we did do before was 154 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:21,920 um if there was like a a closed session um and council was in close session for 155 00:16:19,680 --> 00:16:25,199 like an hour, we would go to those uh and really I guess we we could 156 00:16:23,360 --> 00:16:29,920 technically still do that because if if it's going to reprimmen uh represent the 157 00:16:27,199 --> 00:16:33,279 the official version of it if we were in close session for, you know, an hour and 158 00:16:31,279 --> 00:16:36,079 20 minutes, we would go back and edit and just take out that hour and 20 159 00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:40,240 minutes. So it just wasn't Otherwise, you get an hour and 20 minutes of the of 160 00:16:37,759 --> 00:16:45,920 the lights off, the lights off and nobody home. Uh but um but yeah, we can 161 00:16:43,839 --> 00:16:48,959 we can work out the details. The last few that we've done, we've just uploaded 162 00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:56,199 them. We haven't edited them, so we just put them right up there. Okay. So, we'll 163 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:56,199 work on putting language around that. 164 00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:10,319 Okay. [snorts] 165 00:17:08,799 --> 00:17:14,520 Carrying on from there. There was nothing else on page seven. 166 00:17:15,679 --> 00:17:21,480 Page eight, there was no recommended changes. 167 00:17:25,360 --> 00:17:31,319 Page nine, there was no recommended changes. 168 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:41,822 Page 10, there was no changes. >> [snorts] 169 00:17:45,039 --> 00:17:52,957 » Okay. Page 11, there was a recommended change in item G for agendas. 170 00:17:50,937 --> 00:17:52,957 [snorts] 171 00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:08,559 Um just clarity we have in there right now uh in item 2A it's specifying on the 172 00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:13,120 Wednesday prior to the Wednesday regular meetings uh suggested change on the 173 00:18:10,880 --> 00:18:16,559 Wednesday of the previous week. >> Yeah because if people can interpret 174 00:18:14,720 --> 00:18:21,760 that Wednesday morning I can send you an agenda item um I can send you an agenda 175 00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:24,799 item on the same Wednesday as the meeting. Right. Okay. because of two 176 00:18:23,360 --> 00:18:28,520 Wednesdays. [snorts] It kind of makes it >> sure. Yeah. 177 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:43,600 » Uh and then after that, uh Brenda specify kind of how and when. 178 00:18:40,880 --> 00:18:49,360 » Yeah. Uh only council. Yeah, that was about uh 179 00:18:46,320 --> 00:18:52,799 spending removing an agenda item, I guess. [snorts] 180 00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:55,600 » Okay. to collectively make determine whether 181 00:18:54,640 --> 00:18:58,880 Yeah. >> So, 182 00:18:56,640 --> 00:19:02,400 » yeah. And this was one um just as a carryover from the previous meeting 183 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:09,919 where council just wanted language sort of put in there around um it not being 184 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:14,640 removed. [snorts] Uh only council acting collectively may determine whether a 185 00:19:11,919 --> 00:19:20,160 dually submitted antig agenda item is to be withdrawn or deferred. Um so that's a 186 00:19:17,360 --> 00:19:23,760 good question. Is that done [snorts] uh when is is that done when you adopt 187 00:19:22,080 --> 00:19:27,200 the agenda? Is it done ahead of time? You would suspect that it's going to be 188 00:19:25,120 --> 00:19:33,559 done ahead of time. Um so if there's some discussion for 189 00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:33,559 around that, 190 00:19:37,360 --> 00:19:44,400 but I think those fall under General Roberts rules of order, [snorts] right? 191 00:19:41,679 --> 00:19:50,960 So the agenda item can can remain on the agenda when that item comes up. then the 192 00:19:48,160 --> 00:19:53,600 person who makes the who submits the agenda item can withdraw it, 193 00:19:52,880 --> 00:19:57,600 » right? >> And council as a collective can defer 194 00:19:55,360 --> 00:20:00,400 it. So I don't know that that needs to be in there necessarily, 195 00:19:59,120 --> 00:20:04,240 » right? Because that th those are procedural like Robert's rules of war 196 00:20:02,320 --> 00:20:08,000 standing and that's it's addressed in here anyway. 197 00:20:04,960 --> 00:20:12,840 » Okay. I think and I know this is our actual 198 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:19,520 so I'm sorry rather than have to go to 199 00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:22,400 another document to clarify I find it's easier sometimes if it's spelled out 200 00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:25,120 right in this document >> but I think it's 201 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:32,559 » in this one >> yeah 202 00:20:27,039 --> 00:20:36,559 sorry we do we do talk in here about uh deferring an item and withdrawing an 203 00:20:34,400 --> 00:20:36,559 item 204 00:20:58,799 --> 00:21:07,679 Just I do have a question on on page 11. The la the very last item item three 205 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:12,480 says any additional matter not included on the agenda shall only be considered 206 00:21:09,840 --> 00:21:18,559 with the majority vote of all members of council present at the meeting. So 207 00:21:16,240 --> 00:21:22,720 is that saying that if a council member was missing 208 00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:29,039 can't consider that or are we saying that it's only the members present all 209 00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:34,400 the members present at the meeting? I believe that reads that um any 210 00:21:32,799 --> 00:21:37,919 additional matter not included on the agenda. So if you want to add an agenda 211 00:21:36,240 --> 00:21:41,840 item um I believe that I'm reading that to 212 00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:43,840 mean that you need a majority of council to add that item to the agenda 213 00:21:43,280 --> 00:21:48,280 » at the meeting. >> Right. 214 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:48,280 » The majority at the meeting. 215 00:21:49,520 --> 00:21:54,120 » Yeah. Yeah. Well, I just want to be sure. 216 00:22:20,640 --> 00:22:28,000 I don't like how we've structured number two here. 217 00:22:24,960 --> 00:22:33,520 um on on the regular meetings um when I read that motion and reports 218 00:22:31,679 --> 00:22:36,720 for local government business by members of council and staff shall be submitted 219 00:22:35,120 --> 00:22:39,760 on the standardized agenda form. So that's fine. We've included that that 220 00:22:38,159 --> 00:22:43,919 was referenced previously and it's now in this document as appendix A down at 221 00:22:41,919 --> 00:22:47,200 the end. Uh with all relevant information and documentation to the 222 00:22:45,280 --> 00:22:51,200 clerk from council members in writing or by email for inclusion in the agenda 223 00:22:49,440 --> 00:22:55,520 packages for the meeting of the council not later than 400 p.m. on the Wednesday 224 00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:59,760 of the previous week prior to the Wednesday regular meetings. And once an 225 00:22:57,600 --> 00:23:05,200 agenda I think this B item is a standalone item. It's not it shouldn't 226 00:23:01,679 --> 00:23:09,840 be a B. It doesn't. Yeah, I think that I should uh reword that just to have um on 227 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:14,640 the Wednesday of the previous week specified for the 4pm but then have a 228 00:23:12,720 --> 00:23:18,960 separate it wouldn't be a B. It would be a standalone sentence 229 00:23:17,360 --> 00:23:22,799 » probably, right? It would be a number three and then all the other numbers get 230 00:23:20,559 --> 00:23:27,919 adjusted down. So, I'll make that adjustment. 231 00:23:25,919 --> 00:23:32,640 Uh but but getting back to the suggestion here, uh the the when and how 232 00:23:30,159 --> 00:23:38,320 suggestion. So I think Brenda, just for clarity, we are 233 00:23:34,559 --> 00:23:46,640 trying to determine when and how it may be um 234 00:23:42,240 --> 00:23:50,400 removed, withdrawed or deferred. >> Defer would be definitely deferred would 235 00:23:48,799 --> 00:23:53,039 happen definitely at a meeting. >> At a meeting, right? 236 00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:57,840 » A withdrawal. Just wondering if that's would be something that you know and how 237 00:23:56,000 --> 00:24:02,159 Yeah. just how that would get withdrawn or if it's at a meeting like uh 238 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:04,559 councelor Robinson said maybe it's only the person that put it on the agenda 239 00:24:04,320 --> 00:24:08,440 right >> that can withdraw it from 240 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:28,240 You could also just add that to the sentence. Uh basically uh deferred 241 00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:31,960 according to the latest edition of the Robert's rules order. 242 00:24:42,159 --> 00:24:50,080 Okay. Do we want to do we want to move forward with that? Um, we could say 243 00:24:47,600 --> 00:24:56,520 it's to be withdrawn or deferred um according to the most recent version. 244 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:56,520 Would that cover it? 245 00:26:02,240 --> 00:26:09,679 for a defer from what I can what I can see like who gets the deferred emotion 246 00:26:08,159 --> 00:26:14,000 or >> Yeah. And it's always been something 247 00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:18,159 that's come up um is that like how do you how do you negate an agenda item? I 248 00:26:16,640 --> 00:26:21,919 know this council sort of the the prerogative is you kind of don't, right? 249 00:26:20,480 --> 00:26:27,200 Like you leave it up to the person that put it on. Um so I'm not surprised that 250 00:26:24,720 --> 00:26:32,159 Robert's rules wouldn't have something specific to that. 251 00:26:28,320 --> 00:26:38,400 » Well, to defer is um addressed in section L, procedures for regular and 252 00:26:34,159 --> 00:26:42,559 special meetings under motions 3D to defer. the question to uh say when a 253 00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:46,640 motion is being moved and seconded and is being considered by council. No 254 00:26:44,240 --> 00:26:51,120 motion shall be received except a motion D to defer the question to a certain 255 00:26:48,640 --> 00:26:56,320 time or date >> may be debated. So anybody can defer uh 256 00:26:53,760 --> 00:26:59,760 anybody can defer >> as we used to like to table. Anybody can 257 00:26:58,559 --> 00:27:03,760 do that >> but there's no nothing in definition to 258 00:27:01,919 --> 00:27:06,640 withdraw a motion. Yeah, I'm still reading through that 259 00:27:05,279 --> 00:27:11,640 section to see if it >> I I know we discussed it because uh 260 00:27:13,919 --> 00:27:16,880 » okay, it says in two >> section two. 261 00:27:15,760 --> 00:27:20,240 » Yep. >> After motion has been written to the 262 00:27:18,159 --> 00:27:23,360 clerk and stated by the chair pen, it is possession of council for considering 263 00:27:21,760 --> 00:27:28,080 but with the consent of majority of council by motion and without debate it 264 00:27:25,600 --> 00:27:33,200 may be withdrawn at any time before it has been voted only at the request of 265 00:27:30,559 --> 00:27:35,600 the mover. Okay, so it's covered. later on. 266 00:27:33,919 --> 00:27:38,720 » Yep. >> Okay. So then the only change there is 267 00:27:37,360 --> 00:27:40,640 that we're going to take that B out and move it to an item three. 268 00:27:40,080 --> 00:27:44,679 » Yep. >> Okay. Awesome. 269 00:27:46,159 --> 00:27:51,480 » Okay. We'll carry on to page 12. 270 00:27:57,440 --> 00:28:03,279 Uh in item six, copies of the agenda shall be made available to the general 271 00:28:01,200 --> 00:28:04,399 public. at the [snorts] office of the clerk. 272 00:28:03,919 --> 00:28:06,080 » Sorry. >> Can I go Sorry, [laughter] 273 00:28:05,440 --> 00:28:11,679 » that's okay. >> Can I go back to B just because if we're 274 00:28:09,279 --> 00:28:17,200 leaving it as that, it contradicts what we've said in section L because it says 275 00:28:15,200 --> 00:28:21,120 um only [snorts] council acting collectively may determine whether a 276 00:28:19,200 --> 00:28:24,720 duly submitted agenda item is to be withdrawn and that's not the case. Only 277 00:28:23,120 --> 00:28:25,600 the person who has moved it can withdraw it. 278 00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:30,159 » Okay, >> according to our definitions later um or 279 00:28:28,159 --> 00:28:35,120 deferred that's that's collectively as council. So I think that whole section B 280 00:28:32,799 --> 00:28:38,720 is covered in >> section L. So it can be it can be 281 00:28:37,039 --> 00:28:43,600 eliminated from there. 282 00:28:41,919 --> 00:28:47,320 » Okay, we can take that out if it's covered in other areas. 283 00:28:57,679 --> 00:29:06,720 Okay, are we good with that, council? Then item B is going to just be removed. 284 00:29:03,919 --> 00:29:10,159 Okay. Kind of a chasing tail thing, but it's good. You got to go through the 285 00:29:07,679 --> 00:29:12,960 process, right? So work work yourself through it and then that was one that we 286 00:29:11,360 --> 00:29:16,720 added in. But if we got we recognize that it's somewhere else, then that's 287 00:29:14,159 --> 00:29:20,880 great. Okay. Um page 12. 288 00:29:19,200 --> 00:29:26,559 » Great. And I think number three, I'm going to go back to that one again, too. 289 00:29:22,080 --> 00:29:30,720 Sorry. Um we did discuss having that 290 00:29:28,799 --> 00:29:35,200 that you could not add items to an agenda where there wasn't a full council 291 00:29:32,880 --> 00:29:39,440 present because the majority present if there's three people present. 292 00:29:37,919 --> 00:29:43,200 It's a it's an easy way to sneak something on there that [laughter] 293 00:29:40,960 --> 00:29:48,640 that you know even with people absent then it's been done. So, it's that was 294 00:29:46,320 --> 00:29:51,600 one I we did have some discussion about not allowing 295 00:29:49,520 --> 00:29:56,159 » I would agree with that. All of council should be present. All members of 296 00:29:54,320 --> 00:30:01,520 » Yeah. Not just a majority where if if you've got a special meeting and 297 00:29:58,960 --> 00:30:05,840 only three members of council and the mayor president, then it it just sets up 298 00:30:03,679 --> 00:30:08,720 for >> getting stuff passed, right? That it's 299 00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:12,320 like, oh, I'm going to seize this opportunity to get my item on there 300 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:16,640 because I know. So should we change the language to say any additional matter 301 00:30:14,559 --> 00:30:20,240 not included on the agenda shall only be considered with all members of council 302 00:30:19,120 --> 00:30:23,480 present >> by majority 303 00:30:25,840 --> 00:30:32,960 which all 304 00:30:29,600 --> 00:30:37,520 » so is it unanimous vote on all the council members agree or majority of 305 00:30:35,200 --> 00:30:40,720 council >> okay but the concern the concern here is 306 00:30:39,279 --> 00:30:43,720 that all members of council are present Right. 307 00:30:45,760 --> 00:30:51,600 » So is that what you're looking to change is unanimous. 308 00:30:50,080 --> 00:30:56,279 » Right now it's majority. >> Yeah. 309 00:30:52,640 --> 00:30:56,279 » So how do you 310 00:30:56,320 --> 00:31:02,159 per >> personally I you know I I understand the 311 00:30:59,760 --> 00:31:08,559 point and it is a very strong point that uh we can say all of council but there 312 00:31:05,679 --> 00:31:15,760 are issues that all of council won't agree on. So I I'm I'm in favor at this 313 00:31:11,520 --> 00:31:18,320 stage of saying the majority of council, >> which is what that's how it's written. 314 00:31:17,679 --> 00:31:21,320 » Yeah. >> Okay. 315 00:31:26,799 --> 00:31:31,000 » But that's the way it reads now, right? 316 00:31:32,240 --> 00:31:40,080 » All of members of council present at the 317 00:31:37,519 --> 00:31:43,440 meeting. Okay. >> Oh, okay. I see what you're saying. It's 318 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:46,320 saying all the majority of the counselors who are at the meeting and 319 00:31:44,880 --> 00:31:48,799 you want it to say all of the counselors, 320 00:31:47,519 --> 00:31:55,519 » period. >> Yeah. 321 00:31:50,559 --> 00:32:00,519 » Okay. I see what you're saying. Okay. Um Okay. We'll we'll we'll words smmith 322 00:31:57,519 --> 00:32:00,519 that. 323 00:32:02,399 --> 00:32:07,679 » Yeah. Okay. I I get I get Yeah, I get I get where you're going. It's a It's a 324 00:32:06,000 --> 00:32:11,120 nuance. Yeah. I know it's uh >> Okay. [snorts] 325 00:32:08,399 --> 00:32:17,360 » Any additional matter not included on the agenda shall only be considered with 326 00:32:13,519 --> 00:32:23,279 full um I had the word it's gone with full com with full composite of council 327 00:32:19,519 --> 00:32:30,279 with full counsel by majority vote >> something that like means you have to 328 00:32:25,600 --> 00:32:30,279 have all six members at the table. Okay. 329 00:32:32,720 --> 00:32:39,559 » Yeah. Full full composition. Okay, 330 00:32:43,200 --> 00:32:49,662 I'm not moving from this item until you guys tell me to. Is there anything else 331 00:32:46,399 --> 00:32:49,662 on it? [laughter] 332 00:32:49,760 --> 00:32:56,559 Okay. I don't want you to be quiet. I need I 333 00:32:53,919 --> 00:33:01,200 need you to speak up. Okay. Page 12. 334 00:32:59,600 --> 00:33:05,919 Um, item six. Copies of the agenda shall be 335 00:33:03,679 --> 00:33:08,880 made available to the general public uh at the office of the clerk during office 336 00:33:07,519 --> 00:33:14,640 hours or on the website of the village of Beloon [snorts] by 9:00 a.m. of the 337 00:33:11,279 --> 00:33:17,919 day of the meeting. >> I think that's what we have in there 338 00:33:15,919 --> 00:33:21,120 already. Oh, should be okay. Sorry, you're making 339 00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:25,360 a point. Should be earlier than this. >> Yeah, because if the if there if it's 340 00:33:23,760 --> 00:33:29,440 just not early enough for the public to get the information that we're getting, 341 00:33:27,279 --> 00:33:33,279 right, they should get it very close to the same time. We get ours first. Theirs 342 00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:38,799 should come up very shortly after. >> Yeah, you're right. So, we we try to 343 00:33:35,679 --> 00:33:43,760 make uh post notices uh as best we can 24 hours ahead of time. Um and at the 344 00:33:42,080 --> 00:33:49,679 same time, we've got a process in place now. So, when the agenda goes out, uh it 345 00:33:46,080 --> 00:33:53,360 goes to um uh administration and it gets posted right away. So, do we want to try 346 00:33:51,200 --> 00:33:58,159 to include language that replicates sort of to the best of the ability 24 hours 347 00:33:55,279 --> 00:34:03,120 ahead of the notice? See, the point about the 24 hours is we're we're 348 00:34:00,640 --> 00:34:06,880 allowing that that question period for public, right? Question, comment. So, if 349 00:34:05,440 --> 00:34:11,839 they're only getting the information just shortly before the meeting, plus it 350 00:34:10,399 --> 00:34:15,200 says somewhere down the line here that they have to notify the clerk with their 351 00:34:13,280 --> 00:34:19,839 questions and comments. So, there's just no time to do that. I just me 352 00:34:17,760 --> 00:34:23,760 personally, I feel that it should be as close as possible after the council get 353 00:34:21,839 --> 00:34:29,560 their we get ours on Friday. I would really like to see the public get theirs 354 00:34:25,919 --> 00:34:29,560 on Friday as well. 355 00:34:30,159 --> 00:34:36,320 » Um, just to that point, Landon, it won't be the same agenda that we're sending 356 00:34:35,200 --> 00:34:40,320 out. So, you know how we're saying like we CC Britney now and then she posts it, 357 00:34:38,720 --> 00:34:42,639 but it's not the same agenda that's going to be going out to [snorts] public 358 00:34:41,359 --> 00:34:46,639 because remember we said we have to go through and anything that's to do with a 359 00:34:44,720 --> 00:34:50,240 closed session, any of the financials, that all has to be removed beforehand. 360 00:34:48,879 --> 00:34:53,679 So, Britney won't be posting the same thing that we send to council. Mhm. 361 00:34:52,320 --> 00:34:56,079 » But it won't take long to go through and remove those. 362 00:34:54,399 --> 00:35:02,960 » But we're getting our we're getting our agenda on the Friday with all the 363 00:34:58,800 --> 00:35:09,040 pertinent information. Um you know that if there are some questions to the 364 00:35:05,119 --> 00:35:12,320 agenda, it gives council time before it goes out to the public to over the 365 00:35:10,960 --> 00:35:18,560 weekend type thing. you know, you can read your package and then, you know, I 366 00:35:16,000 --> 00:35:24,480 I'm I'm looking I I I understand your point, 9:00 on the Wednesday, but even 367 00:35:21,599 --> 00:35:30,240 if I said 9:00 on the Tuesday, you know, prior to that type of thing, because if 368 00:35:27,440 --> 00:35:36,400 if council has some questions on the agenda, then that would allow time to 369 00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:40,200 modify the agenda on the Monday before it's posted, right? 370 00:35:44,480 --> 00:35:49,520 I >> I would look probably at at Monday at 4 371 00:35:47,359 --> 00:35:52,480 releasing it. >> Yeah, 372 00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:55,440 » that's that's >> Yeah. 373 00:35:54,480 --> 00:35:58,800 Sorry, what was that? >> But if Monday's a holiday, Tuesday 374 00:35:57,119 --> 00:36:03,000 morning at 9:00. >> Yeah. 375 00:36:00,000 --> 00:36:03,000 » Yeah. 376 00:36:03,359 --> 00:36:07,119 » Monday seems to be the always the holidays. 377 00:36:05,760 --> 00:36:10,480 » That's why we change our meetings to Wednesdays. So 378 00:36:11,760 --> 00:36:17,920 Well, and I like I said 379 00:36:15,680 --> 00:36:21,359 » I don't I like I said the fact that councelor 380 00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:26,320 Burke had said about you know gives council time to make the adjustments. 381 00:36:23,760 --> 00:36:29,760 Um, but normally if everything has went in the way it should have went in, there 382 00:36:27,760 --> 00:36:34,160 should be very little adjustments that would be required by council, right, to 383 00:36:32,160 --> 00:36:37,599 change the agenda at that time if everybody submitted their document the 384 00:36:35,839 --> 00:36:40,400 way they're supposed to because we said you can't really take it off the agenda 385 00:36:39,119 --> 00:36:44,079 if everything has been submitted properly. So, I don't know what the 386 00:36:42,160 --> 00:36:50,000 changes that council would make to the agenda, be honest with you, um, after 387 00:36:46,720 --> 00:36:55,280 they receive it. So [snorts] >> yeah, to the clerk's point, we would 388 00:36:51,680 --> 00:36:59,440 have to we are going to there's going to be a bit of a learning curve um just for 389 00:36:57,839 --> 00:37:05,520 when the agenda goes out and then we're going to modify it. Um, so do we want to 390 00:37:02,800 --> 00:37:11,119 try to include language here that says essentially when 391 00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:16,720 um, you know, on the same day that council receives their agenda, 392 00:37:14,240 --> 00:37:21,680 then there's an attempt to release it to the public. 393 00:37:19,599 --> 00:37:26,240 I I don't know if this is an appropriate statement, but I'm going to say it 394 00:37:22,800 --> 00:37:32,400 anyway. You know, [clears throat] council members should be showing 395 00:37:28,880 --> 00:37:37,760 respect for council members. So, when you're talking about changes, 396 00:37:35,599 --> 00:37:43,599 I mean, it should only be something administration received over the weekend 397 00:37:40,640 --> 00:37:50,000 and wants council to be aware. I mean, you know, when when we're trying to 398 00:37:46,720 --> 00:37:53,440 reinvent the wheel here, you know, I I understand a word or two can make a 399 00:37:51,680 --> 00:37:59,280 tremendous difference, but by the same token, in my opinion, if you're trying 400 00:37:56,960 --> 00:38:04,720 to manipulate the system, you're trying to show lack of respect for your fellow 401 00:38:01,760 --> 00:38:10,240 council members. And, you know, let let's let's use a little common sense 402 00:38:07,040 --> 00:38:15,280 here. and and you know I mean I I do agree with the CEO's comment that there 403 00:38:12,480 --> 00:38:19,280 is going to be a learning curve but you know 404 00:38:17,040 --> 00:38:23,000 respect it'll go a long ways in trying to deal with issues 405 00:38:24,079 --> 00:38:30,400 » in terms of what they were saying like with what I know with the for the staff 406 00:38:27,920 --> 00:38:33,839 to be able to get the public one out initially what you may have to do like I 407 00:38:32,320 --> 00:38:37,520 said is once you take out the document you don't have to it might have to be 408 00:38:35,040 --> 00:38:41,599 like a scan PDF document and upload it as one big document for the public, 409 00:38:39,839 --> 00:38:45,839 right? Versus where they would click in and see it would just maybe have to be a 410 00:38:43,839 --> 00:38:54,079 scan of everything and one document uploaded until we have the ability to be 411 00:38:48,960 --> 00:38:58,240 able to do it otherwise. Um, so >> sorry. No, I think that we we do have 412 00:38:56,240 --> 00:39:01,920 because it's all the nice thing about uh ICOMs is it puts it out in a PDF format. 413 00:39:00,320 --> 00:39:06,960 So, we do have the ability to manage PDF. So, so, um, I I think we should be 414 00:39:05,119 --> 00:39:09,520 able to kind of do it relatively clean. So, there there would be a learning 415 00:39:08,240 --> 00:39:14,560 curve. I'm just trying to sort of work my way through the timeline. Like, uh, 416 00:39:11,599 --> 00:39:21,200 Angela would finalize the the, um, the agenda and then per this procedural 417 00:39:17,920 --> 00:39:26,079 bylaw, she would have until, sorry, what did we have the Thursday? Sorry, when 418 00:39:23,920 --> 00:39:31,680 are you going to get it out? Friday. >> Friday. Friday at 4 p.m. 419 00:39:29,599 --> 00:39:35,359 » Now, we have to get our items in place, >> right? So, you got to get your items in 420 00:39:33,040 --> 00:39:41,520 on Wednesday. She's got to have the agenda item, the agenda packages out to 421 00:39:37,760 --> 00:39:47,200 council for Friday at 400 PM. [snorts] Obviously, that's not conducive to us 422 00:39:44,720 --> 00:39:53,280 also getting it posted to the public for 4 p.m., right? 423 00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:58,640 there's an adjustments even just the uh administrative type um adjustments then 424 00:39:56,240 --> 00:40:04,960 then >> but would leaving it till Monday really 425 00:40:01,520 --> 00:40:08,240 be I mean like council B said if [snorts] we're getting it Friday 426 00:40:06,079 --> 00:40:10,480 afternoon and they're only getting it >> Monday 427 00:40:08,800 --> 00:40:14,400 » Monday afternoon or early Tuesday morning they still have a whole two days 428 00:40:13,359 --> 00:40:18,640 » to look it over >> y so maybe um 429 00:40:16,560 --> 00:40:22,400 » yeah you could go with like you said the fact that it could be Monday by 4 and in 430 00:40:20,800 --> 00:40:24,880 the event of a holiday it will be Tuesday by 9. 431 00:40:23,839 --> 00:40:28,560 » Would that make sense? >> I think so. 432 00:40:25,760 --> 00:40:33,000 » And that just simplifies it to covers holidays. Everybody has time for 433 00:40:43,520 --> 00:40:54,000 uh we'll do Monday at um 400 pm and then we'll just put wording in 434 00:40:50,960 --> 00:40:58,200 around the holiday. Um yeah, in event of a holiday Tuesday. 435 00:41:01,359 --> 00:41:10,200 I did also add resolution reports. >> Just added the word reports in there. 436 00:41:10,880 --> 00:41:13,880 » Yeah. 437 00:41:18,640 --> 00:41:22,079 » Sir, you're looking at number seven, right? 438 00:41:20,640 --> 00:41:26,040 » Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. 439 00:41:26,240 --> 00:41:29,400 All right. 440 00:41:32,160 --> 00:41:41,040 Uh, moving down on page 12. Um, continuing on page 12, clarity around, 441 00:41:38,319 --> 00:41:46,720 um, again Wednesday of the previous week prior. 442 00:41:43,440 --> 00:41:49,920 » Yeah, just on number seven, I changed I just scratched because we're talking 443 00:41:48,160 --> 00:41:54,319 about reports by members of council. I just changed the word statements to 444 00:41:51,680 --> 00:42:00,079 reports and added regarding municipal business. 445 00:41:57,040 --> 00:42:03,720 if that's acceptable everyone. >> Yep. Yep. 446 00:42:07,920 --> 00:42:13,680 » Okay, cool. Moving down to the committee of whole meetings. So again, replicating 447 00:42:12,079 --> 00:42:18,400 uh I I would say that this would just be the same language with the uh when and 448 00:42:15,520 --> 00:42:23,720 how. Um 449 00:42:20,319 --> 00:42:23,720 we did 450 00:42:26,880 --> 00:42:34,720 Okay. >> Oh, yes. Yes. Yes. That's item A. Yep. 451 00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:39,520 » Yep. No, that's good. C. Uh, we struck out item B previously 452 00:42:37,839 --> 00:42:40,640 uh on the So, we'll do the same thing. >> Three. Yep. 453 00:42:40,000 --> 00:42:43,640 » Yep. >> Perfect. 454 00:42:46,800 --> 00:42:51,319 » Excellent. >> Same for six. 455 00:42:52,240 --> 00:43:02,240 » Okay. Uh continuing on to page 13, uh item six, 456 00:42:59,359 --> 00:43:06,000 » just be a repeat date of the previous six. 457 00:43:03,680 --> 00:43:09,240 » Okay. Yep. And we can just replicate the uh Monday 458 00:43:10,160 --> 00:43:16,520 400 p.m. in the event of holiday blah blah blah. 459 00:43:17,599 --> 00:43:20,599 Okay. 460 00:43:25,280 --> 00:43:33,359 Um, moving down on page 13 and H, public participation. Just clarity uh made here 461 00:43:31,280 --> 00:43:37,599 at the committee poll meetings that was not specified. So, we can add that in 462 00:43:35,520 --> 00:43:42,200 just to uh so the public's aware that these will now be during the CO. 463 00:43:43,359 --> 00:43:49,040 Uh, which is great by the way. Just so council's aware, we're uh we got a lot 464 00:43:47,280 --> 00:43:52,400 of uh incoming requests for presentations to council. 465 00:43:51,165 --> 00:44:02,079 [clears throat] >> I do I do have a question on that. The 466 00:43:56,480 --> 00:44:09,760 the chair is the direction in which any meeting is directed. 467 00:44:04,960 --> 00:44:14,480 So when the chair would allow a member of the public to speak, 468 00:44:12,880 --> 00:44:18,800 I I'm just wondering is council comfortable with that? And that's why 469 00:44:16,400 --> 00:44:24,640 I'm bringing it up because I am. I I believe that the chair should have that 470 00:44:21,920 --> 00:44:28,400 authority to be able to ask a question of the public freely. And I'm just 471 00:44:26,800 --> 00:44:32,160 wondering how the rest of council feel about that. 472 00:44:30,480 --> 00:44:36,079 » You're saying for the chair to ask the questions to the public? 473 00:44:33,200 --> 00:44:40,480 » No. No. I'm saying if if if if an issue is coming up on council and we're we're 474 00:44:38,400 --> 00:44:45,839 discussing that issue, that's already happened a couple of times already and 475 00:44:42,240 --> 00:44:52,480 the chair asked the public, do you wish to comment on that or do you have a 476 00:44:47,760 --> 00:44:57,359 question on that? And I I want to I mean personally I believe the chair should 477 00:44:54,720 --> 00:45:00,800 have the right to do that. I just want to be sure that it's not something 478 00:44:58,800 --> 00:45:04,800 that's going to rise in the future that there'd be some objections. Uh, so I 479 00:45:03,040 --> 00:45:08,160 have no objection with it. I believe the chair should have that authority and I'm 480 00:45:06,800 --> 00:45:11,800 just wondering if the rest of council feels the same way. 481 00:45:11,839 --> 00:45:17,839 » Yeah, I think he was refer you're referring to the example where we had 482 00:45:15,280 --> 00:45:23,359 the presentation on the flexo >> and open open it open the floor and 483 00:45:20,720 --> 00:45:26,720 things like that. Uh because I I'm not opposed to that. that I believe as chair 484 00:45:25,040 --> 00:45:32,079 he should have that authorization to go to the to to ask those or to direct it 485 00:45:29,599 --> 00:45:37,599 that way should you feel free to do so and I I don't want to be debating that 486 00:45:35,119 --> 00:45:42,240 in public if something controversial should arise I'm just trying to clear 487 00:45:39,280 --> 00:45:45,200 the air on that issue right now >> um if it comes to like you said 488 00:45:43,760 --> 00:45:48,480 somebody's making a presentation to council and it and it affects the 489 00:45:46,720 --> 00:45:53,359 community somehow I don't have any I just I just was kind of curious as to 490 00:45:50,560 --> 00:45:56,480 whether we're doing business uh council business and the chair would ask the 491 00:45:54,960 --> 00:46:00,079 public for comments. I don't believe think that should be. But if it's a 492 00:45:58,400 --> 00:46:03,839 presentation where information's been shared with us and and the public, then 493 00:46:02,480 --> 00:46:07,200 you want to, you know, I'm just kind of a little worried if if we're doing 494 00:46:05,200 --> 00:46:13,800 council business, I wouldn't want to see ask for public opinion at those times 495 00:46:09,280 --> 00:46:13,800 because it it, you know, 496 00:46:25,040 --> 00:46:30,560 Sorry, I'm just looking at what we have right now. Um, 497 00:46:29,280 --> 00:46:34,280 no, I don't think that it needs to be specified. Um, 498 00:46:34,480 --> 00:46:41,800 yeah. Yeah, I I think you're right though, Jimmy. It's pretty much uh Okay, 499 00:46:44,160 --> 00:46:52,160 » just on number two, I did this where the Wednesday of the previous week again, 500 00:46:49,680 --> 00:46:54,240 the same as before because you say 2 PM on Wednesday prior to the Wednesday 501 00:46:53,680 --> 00:46:56,160 meeting. >> Yeah. 502 00:46:54,720 --> 00:47:02,920 » So, we just have to make sure to put that the previous week. 503 00:46:59,920 --> 00:47:02,920 So, 504 00:47:05,359 --> 00:47:09,960 » uh, yeah. Sorry. Where was that, Brenda? 505 00:47:11,200 --> 00:47:15,440 » Number two, when they get their information in, says not later than 2 506 00:47:14,240 --> 00:47:17,280 p.m. on the Wednesday. >> Gotcha. 507 00:47:16,000 --> 00:47:20,480 » Yeah. Again, we have to [snorts] put up the previous week 508 00:47:18,800 --> 00:47:22,960 » because they may assume, well, 2 o'clock on Wednesday, I can put something in for 509 00:47:22,000 --> 00:47:25,960 Wednesday night meeting. >> Yeah. 510 00:47:27,440 --> 00:47:29,839 That would be right in this section here, right? 511 00:47:29,520 --> 00:47:34,480 » Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. 512 00:47:32,560 --> 00:47:38,079 » Perfect. Okay. Uh item number three. Upon receipt of information accordance 513 00:47:35,920 --> 00:47:44,760 with the proceeding uh one subsections G2, that's incorrect. We renamed that to 514 00:47:40,319 --> 00:47:44,760 H. So that should be changed to H2. 515 00:47:47,599 --> 00:47:53,480 And uh the change from regular to committee poll meeting. 516 00:48:01,599 --> 00:48:04,599 Okay. 517 00:48:06,800 --> 00:48:17,200 Uh no changes on page 14. >> And that that was uh I didn't make any 518 00:48:14,160 --> 00:48:21,119 changes, but I made a note. Um, it was about the questions request to add to 519 00:48:19,440 --> 00:48:26,240 the persons must be submitted by Miss No later. So, if they're only getting the 520 00:48:23,040 --> 00:48:33,359 package on if the public is only getting the package on Monday or Tuesday. 521 00:48:30,319 --> 00:48:36,880 » Um, and I think this was saying it was referring to the previous week. They 522 00:48:34,960 --> 00:48:42,000 couldn't really submit their questions the week before they get the agenda. So 523 00:48:40,000 --> 00:48:46,319 that you do so they do if they want to be on for the question comment period if 524 00:48:44,240 --> 00:48:49,839 I understand this correctly they have to submit the questions to the clerk prior 525 00:48:49,040 --> 00:48:52,480 to the meeting >> right 526 00:48:50,400 --> 00:48:57,680 » so if they're only getting the package on Monday or Tuesday 527 00:48:55,920 --> 00:49:01,119 when would they have to exactly have the questions into the clerk 528 00:48:59,359 --> 00:49:06,400 » okay so I went through the same process in in my mind um at about 3:00 in the 529 00:49:04,720 --> 00:49:10,880 morning on one of the nights and I was thinking 530 00:49:07,359 --> 00:49:16,720 » does council want are Are we structuring this so that they can only ask questions 531 00:49:13,359 --> 00:49:22,000 that's on the agenda of that month or do you want to say they can ask questions 532 00:49:18,800 --> 00:49:24,960 from pre a previous agenda? Because you're right, if they're they only have 533 00:49:23,599 --> 00:49:30,160 they get the agenda, they're going to get it on the Monday and they have until 534 00:49:27,839 --> 00:49:32,960 maybe Tuesday and then they only have a day to review it and submit the 535 00:49:31,680 --> 00:49:38,720 questions. There's not enough time to put their questions together and get it 536 00:49:35,440 --> 00:49:45,200 to to the clerk. So, does council want to consider saying that questions from 537 00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:50,319 the public are available for the current and previous regular meeting agenda or 538 00:49:48,640 --> 00:49:53,280 previous month's agenda, something along those lines? 539 00:49:52,074 --> 00:49:57,920 [snorts] >> Yeah, I think people should be able to 540 00:49:54,880 --> 00:50:02,079 people should be able to talk to >> what was on the agenda the month before, 541 00:50:00,319 --> 00:50:05,520 right? At least not people aren't necessarily going to read the package, 542 00:50:04,079 --> 00:50:10,160 but they might watch the meeting and say, "What is that about?" Exactly. 543 00:50:07,520 --> 00:50:14,160 » Right. So So they I mean I >> I don't know. I I I don't see the 544 00:50:12,079 --> 00:50:18,000 problem people asking questions. >> If it's an item that has been dealt with 545 00:50:16,079 --> 00:50:22,400 by council or is being dealt with by council, whether it's this month, 546 00:50:20,480 --> 00:50:25,119 » three months ago, >> if they've got questions, they should be 547 00:50:23,599 --> 00:50:28,880 able to ask. from my perspective when I'm just looking at you know that how we 548 00:50:27,280 --> 00:50:33,760 have this process laid out to me inherently the questions are going to be 549 00:50:30,960 --> 00:50:38,800 about the previous month >> right 550 00:50:35,599 --> 00:50:43,280 » or or they may have a comment what on the agenda of this month that council 551 00:50:41,520 --> 00:50:47,680 I'm just wondering why they have to submit it ahead of time in writing 552 00:50:45,680 --> 00:50:52,000 » yeah I I think that limits people and it it's it's very offputting and 553 00:50:49,920 --> 00:50:56,480 intimidating for a lot of people to have to submit it in writing 554 00:50:53,680 --> 00:51:00,400 rather than show up, sit through whatever section they have to and just 555 00:50:58,000 --> 00:51:06,079 say, "I have a question." [laughter] Right? Like, and if it pertains to 556 00:51:02,240 --> 00:51:09,920 municipal business, then it we we I don't like putting up roadblocks for 557 00:51:07,440 --> 00:51:14,720 people to have an opportunity to to speak and ask a question or make a 558 00:51:12,240 --> 00:51:18,800 comment because when I read this on with with other agendas, it didn't have any 559 00:51:16,880 --> 00:51:22,640 specification that like when you make a presentation, petition, delegation, 560 00:51:20,319 --> 00:51:26,720 that's a whole different story. But just this small question period they had like 561 00:51:24,640 --> 00:51:31,839 where we allocated 10 minutes two two minutes per person uh the chairman if it 562 00:51:29,280 --> 00:51:36,559 if it's not related to anything that should be discussed they could make that 563 00:51:33,359 --> 00:51:41,040 call but I just I just they just seem to open the floor that for that 10 minutes 564 00:51:38,720 --> 00:51:46,319 to give the public an opportunity to speak to agenda items or previous agenda 565 00:51:43,760 --> 00:51:51,119 items and uh just to let them have that 10 minutes two minutes per person 566 00:51:48,800 --> 00:51:54,480 without having to be so formal and by submitting Okay. 567 00:51:52,160 --> 00:51:58,240 » Yeah, I don't have a problem with that. >> That for me. 568 00:51:56,079 --> 00:52:02,960 » Yeah. >> If there's something we can answer, then 569 00:52:00,720 --> 00:52:07,280 uh council should have the opportunity to uh to respond to their questions. If 570 00:52:05,520 --> 00:52:10,079 we can't, we'll say >> as long as it pertains to 571 00:52:09,680 --> 00:52:14,079 » Yeah. >> village. 572 00:52:10,960 --> 00:52:19,680 » The other side of the coin is all all questions should be directed to the 573 00:52:16,559 --> 00:52:23,760 chair. So, no council member should have to answer a question other than coming 574 00:52:21,920 --> 00:52:28,160 through the chair and the chair can determine whether it's a viable question 575 00:52:25,839 --> 00:52:30,160 or not. >> That it's just standard. 576 00:52:29,680 --> 00:52:34,160 » Yeah. >> And and then if the if the mayor want or 577 00:52:32,079 --> 00:52:39,520 the chair wants to direct it to a council member to respond, it would keep 578 00:52:36,800 --> 00:52:41,520 that that control and that order. For sure. 579 00:52:40,079 --> 00:52:44,520 » Agreed. >> So, 580 00:52:45,760 --> 00:52:56,240 » okay. But how does that impact your item I which is your public 581 00:52:52,960 --> 00:53:01,760 comments and questions on 14? >> It should basically it should be just 582 00:52:58,720 --> 00:53:09,119 that that there will be on there's that 10 minutes slot time slot allocated uh 583 00:53:05,200 --> 00:53:14,720 allowing two minutes per person whatever >> uh must address council true to chair. 584 00:53:11,920 --> 00:53:20,319 » Yep. uh at the microphone port. I'm sure and 585 00:53:16,800 --> 00:53:25,440 it has to be on on either their current agenda items or previous meeting agenda 586 00:53:23,599 --> 00:53:29,760 items, but I don't like I said I don't think 587 00:53:27,040 --> 00:53:35,839 the formal of writing is kind of not what like like you said it kind of 588 00:53:33,280 --> 00:53:39,680 » so so are we going to allow for example someone to say okay I have a question 589 00:53:37,599 --> 00:53:46,000 then they come to the to the podium and then it's more of a statement than it is 590 00:53:42,000 --> 00:53:51,599 a question. So, um, you know, I don't like this and I don't like that and this 591 00:53:48,319 --> 00:53:58,000 type of thing. I'm opposed to that that it should be you have a question, you 592 00:53:55,280 --> 00:54:01,680 ask the question, you sit down, then the question is answered. 593 00:53:59,440 --> 00:54:04,960 » That contradicts your you've got it as public comments and questions. If you're 594 00:54:03,520 --> 00:54:08,400 going to do that, >> you might have to remove that comments. 595 00:54:06,960 --> 00:54:12,720 But I believe the comments are important because like I said, somebody from the 596 00:54:10,240 --> 00:54:18,240 public may say something to us that we have no idea about and it may help us in 597 00:54:15,440 --> 00:54:21,359 our deliberations and our debate. So, uh, yes, I know we're going to have the 598 00:54:19,680 --> 00:54:24,960 odd ones and again, the chair is going to be the guy that's said that's going 599 00:54:23,359 --> 00:54:28,880 to have to, you know, call it the order and stuff, but I believe, like I said, 600 00:54:26,960 --> 00:54:33,440 we're six people in this room, eight people in this room with the staff. 601 00:54:30,800 --> 00:54:36,640 We're not all the smartest people in the room and probably not all the smartest 602 00:54:34,880 --> 00:54:40,319 people in the community. So somebody might be able to just assist us 603 00:54:38,079 --> 00:54:44,880 sometimes with some information that we didn't know. So I think comments are 604 00:54:42,480 --> 00:54:48,559 important as long as they're kept within the realms of the municipal business 605 00:54:46,880 --> 00:54:52,400 that we're supposed to be talking about. Not slanders, not insulting. And even if 606 00:54:51,200 --> 00:54:56,240 they say they don't agree with us, that's fine. That then we know they 607 00:54:54,640 --> 00:54:58,480 don't agree with us. But that's okay. You know, 608 00:54:56,960 --> 00:55:01,280 » people have a right to tell you you made a bad decision like it. That's 609 00:54:59,920 --> 00:55:07,440 » I'm not disagree with you. >> That's right. No. 610 00:55:04,559 --> 00:55:12,240 » Done in a proper respectful manner. >> I'm okay with that. 611 00:55:08,800 --> 00:55:15,680 » Okay. So, how does that impact I members of the public may request to speak under 612 00:55:14,000 --> 00:55:19,119 the agenda heading uh public comments and questions on matters that relate 613 00:55:17,119 --> 00:55:24,880 directly to an item appearing on the agenda of the upcoming meeting. So, that 614 00:55:22,160 --> 00:55:27,680 we're going to adjust, but but the whole whole idea of the sentence really 615 00:55:26,240 --> 00:55:32,800 doesn't apply. I don't think they have to request members of the public may 616 00:55:30,800 --> 00:55:35,760 speak under the agenda headings. >> Yeah. 617 00:55:33,520 --> 00:55:38,319 » On matters that that part that could still stay. Yeah. 618 00:55:36,720 --> 00:55:40,880 » And then the bottom the two other sections could probably be taken out and 619 00:55:39,920 --> 00:55:45,920 then the bottom one. >> So, sorry. Sorry. Just to continue your 620 00:55:42,960 --> 00:55:49,920 thought. Members of the public um may speak under the agenda heading uh public 621 00:55:48,319 --> 00:55:56,720 comments and questions on matters that relate directly to an agenda item 622 00:55:54,720 --> 00:55:59,359 » because we're we're not going to specify an upcoming agenda item. 623 00:55:58,319 --> 00:56:02,960 » Okay. >> Or an item oh sorry or sorry it's 624 00:56:01,839 --> 00:56:05,040 already captured there an item that appeared on the agenda the previous 625 00:56:04,319 --> 00:56:07,440 meeting. >> So if we keep it 626 00:56:06,799 --> 00:56:11,520 » like that. >> Okay. And then if we take out paragraph 627 00:56:09,599 --> 00:56:17,119 2, paragraph 3, and then paragraph three, uh, four states that it will be a 628 00:56:14,480 --> 00:56:20,799 10-minute time slot only, would each individual only be given two minutes, 629 00:56:19,040 --> 00:56:25,599 and if only two come up, then it's four minutes. You know what I mean? You don't 630 00:56:22,559 --> 00:56:29,599 get to stretch it because only and uh members of the public may address 631 00:56:27,040 --> 00:56:33,520 council through the chair at the microphone or at the podium 632 00:56:31,760 --> 00:56:38,760 microphone to ensure audio is properly recorded. So long as it's directed to 633 00:56:35,520 --> 00:56:38,760 the chair 634 00:56:40,400 --> 00:56:44,880 » and just a word thing. >> Yeah. 635 00:56:43,520 --> 00:56:51,040 » Issue >> uh in the first um paragraph uh or an 636 00:56:48,319 --> 00:56:55,280 item that appeared on the agenda of a previous meeting instead of the previous 637 00:56:53,280 --> 00:57:01,400 meeting. It let it allows them several months, right? So just substitute. 638 00:56:57,680 --> 00:57:01,400 Perfect. Thank you. 639 00:57:07,680 --> 00:57:12,880 Okay. Members of the public may speak under 640 00:57:11,200 --> 00:57:17,160 the agenda heading public comments and questions on matters that relate to 641 00:57:17,920 --> 00:57:26,480 relate uh directly to an item on the agenda of the upcoming meeting or an 642 00:57:24,160 --> 00:57:34,559 item that appeared on the agenda of a previous meeting. Okay. Uh next one gets 643 00:57:30,799 --> 00:57:39,520 done gets uh omitted. Uh next one gets omitted. Public 644 00:57:37,359 --> 00:57:43,839 questions and public comments and questions will have a 10-minute time 645 00:57:40,799 --> 00:57:48,960 slot allocation each uh with each approved member of the public limited to 646 00:57:46,720 --> 00:57:51,119 two with each approved member of the public. 647 00:57:49,680 --> 00:57:57,400 » I would say instead of approved recognize so the mayor would recognize 648 00:57:52,640 --> 00:57:57,400 that person right as being able to 649 00:58:00,559 --> 00:58:07,040 With each recognized member of the public limited to two minute time slots, 650 00:58:05,760 --> 00:58:11,119 members of the public must address council through the chair at the 651 00:58:09,040 --> 00:58:13,760 microphone at the podium to ensure audio is properly recorded. 652 00:58:12,559 --> 00:58:16,319 » And I don't know if we want to put something in there to the fact that they 653 00:58:15,040 --> 00:58:22,040 should state their name like you know when they come they should state their 654 00:58:18,160 --> 00:58:22,040 name when they come to the podium. 655 00:58:30,000 --> 00:58:34,520 Sorry, no one lets me hear my phone buzzing. 656 00:58:36,480 --> 00:58:45,520 » Yeah. One second. Just put members of the public must public must state their 657 00:58:42,079 --> 00:58:47,760 name, address the council to the chair uh at the podium. 658 00:58:47,359 --> 00:58:50,799 » Yeah. >> Microphone whatever to ensure audio is 659 00:58:49,599 --> 00:58:53,920 properly recorded. So, >> perfect. [snorts] 660 00:58:53,200 --> 00:58:57,240 All right, >> almost there. 661 00:59:00,400 --> 00:59:09,440 » Okay, I think that's it for page 14. Moving on to page 15. Uh so yeah, this 662 00:59:06,880 --> 00:59:12,480 was one that um so interesting. Just so council is aware, we got this really 663 00:59:10,720 --> 00:59:16,720 great tool that uh is done through Microsoft uh Microsoft Copilot. 664 00:59:14,640 --> 00:59:20,720 Excellent for when we're drafting this type of stuff. Um and you can put a 665 00:59:18,960 --> 00:59:25,359 document into it and it it will actually refer to it. So you can ask questions on 666 00:59:22,480 --> 00:59:31,200 it and we were uh I was using this tool and uh it put in you know the the 667 00:59:28,160 --> 00:59:36,480 process for the uh submitts and uh the tool actually even though it had the 668 00:59:33,040 --> 00:59:42,240 document completely um went over the conflict of interest. So we've actually 669 00:59:38,880 --> 00:59:47,680 filed with Microsoft on feedback for it um because it was in direct uh conflict 670 00:59:45,839 --> 00:59:51,839 with what was actually supposed to happen. Uh so we will include in here 671 00:59:50,000 --> 00:59:55,440 submitted to the local uh governance commission. 672 00:59:52,799 --> 00:59:59,921 » And just for record uh we don't submit the official document. The official 673 00:59:57,440 --> 01:00:03,839 document stays with the municipality. [snorts] I think they said you can just 674 01:00:01,359 --> 01:00:07,200 send a a scanned email copy to them. >> Yep. So they've actually I reached out 675 01:00:05,359 --> 01:00:13,359 to them and they've sent the process. Um so it's just an email that needs to go 676 01:00:08,960 --> 01:00:18,240 in. Uh they do um we've sent in all of the forms that council did at the 677 01:00:15,280 --> 01:00:22,400 beginning. Um, and we have not we haven't had any uh since then, but when 678 01:00:20,559 --> 01:00:25,839 we get one now. So, they've they've given us the process. It's just a real 679 01:00:24,000 --> 01:00:28,640 quick email that we shoot over to them. >> And the thing with your system, it might 680 01:00:27,440 --> 01:00:33,839 have come up like that because I know the commission office was asking for the 681 01:00:31,280 --> 01:00:37,440 government to take that out that they didn't have to get copies, but that 682 01:00:35,680 --> 01:00:40,960 didn't get changed. So, they'll still have to get copies. 683 01:00:38,480 --> 01:00:45,520 » But what I think was that when I was using the tool, I was specifying 684 01:00:43,359 --> 01:00:48,799 commissioner. I think that's where it was it was 685 01:00:47,119 --> 01:00:52,079 bunging up was that I was like where what commissioner does it need to go to 686 01:00:50,559 --> 01:00:55,839 and it says it doesn't have to go to a commissioner and then I said yes it does 687 01:00:54,160 --> 01:01:00,079 and then I and then I went back and I used 91 and I put it in and I said this 688 01:00:58,559 --> 01:01:03,040 specifies that it needs to be submitted which commissioner and it came back and 689 01:01:01,599 --> 01:01:09,240 said no you don't have to send it to a commissioner so it was this uh fight 690 01:01:05,422 --> 01:01:09,240 [snorts] this fight with AI 691 01:01:12,319 --> 01:01:17,267 » okay outside of that no changes on >> [clears throat] 692 01:01:21,040 --> 01:01:25,960 » Uh, page 16, no changes. 693 01:01:28,079 --> 01:01:33,160 Page 17, no changes. 694 01:01:36,480 --> 01:01:45,359 18. No recommended changes. I think that we are 695 01:01:43,359 --> 01:01:48,640 through. and 1920. 696 01:01:47,997 --> 01:01:52,359 » [snorts] >> was only like I said 697 01:01:52,640 --> 01:02:00,280 » we had never talked about the previous one we had two years right 698 01:02:04,319 --> 01:02:09,960 » our review [clears throat] >> with that 699 01:02:21,760 --> 01:02:26,000 Sorry, what was what would you use? Two years. 700 01:02:24,480 --> 01:02:31,119 » That's what we did for the enumeration bylaw. So that would bring us this 701 01:02:28,000 --> 01:02:35,119 council will review it once and then the next election whoever that council is 702 01:02:32,720 --> 01:02:38,319 they could review it early in their mandate as well if they want to make 703 01:02:37,440 --> 01:02:43,440 changes. >> We'll just cut and paste the same that 704 01:02:39,920 --> 01:02:48,160 we used for the uh remuneration bylaw. Just a note that your first reading it 705 01:02:45,119 --> 01:02:51,440 should say by title on the bottom just for 706 01:02:50,319 --> 01:02:54,640 » Gotcha. >> The other thing I I noticed too like 707 01:02:53,119 --> 01:02:58,640 sometime I don't I didn't look at your last version but sometimes when we're 708 01:02:56,240 --> 01:03:02,000 writing in like we have uh say for instance clerk and a small C and clerk 709 01:03:00,480 --> 01:03:04,720 and a capital C. >> I'm [snorts] going to go through 710 01:03:03,040 --> 01:03:06,640 » that's just a clean up. You know you take 711 01:03:05,040 --> 01:03:10,880 » I'm just going to do a find and replace. Um, we've got a bunch of regular 712 01:03:08,880 --> 01:03:16,478 meetings where it's a lowercase R >> and I just want to go through just clean 713 01:03:13,359 --> 01:03:16,478 it up [clears throat] 714 01:03:21,359 --> 01:03:27,039 » with the posting that we're going to be doing and we're up against the clock on 715 01:03:25,280 --> 01:03:30,319 that. So, our intent here is that this is going to be worked on today, 716 01:03:28,400 --> 01:03:35,760 finalized. Your guy you you guys are going to receive a copy of this today. 717 01:03:32,400 --> 01:03:39,039 Um we're we would need to post it next Monday. Next Monday Monday is a holiday, 718 01:03:37,520 --> 01:03:45,119 so we're going to post it tomorrow instead. Uh so we're a little bit ahead 719 01:03:40,960 --> 01:03:48,799 of time. Um with the posting, the idea is that this is a 20page document and 720 01:03:47,039 --> 01:03:54,000 then it saves us from having to read it in its entirety. So uh it's it's 721 01:03:51,119 --> 01:03:59,760 prescribed um on how we do that. Would that last reading then be considered to 722 01:03:56,400 --> 01:04:05,280 be in its entirety or all three would be by title? That was the one question. 723 01:04:02,400 --> 01:04:07,680 Okay. I'm not sure of yet, but there's third reading. Yeah, 724 01:04:06,240 --> 01:04:08,480 » I'm I'm going to verify that. >> Yeah. 725 01:04:08,160 --> 01:04:12,280 » Okay. >> I was supposed to say 726 01:04:15,280 --> 01:04:21,319 » Okay. So, um what do we think? Uh 727 01:04:22,240 --> 01:04:30,000 I mean, keep in mind that um [snorts] we still as this sort of unfolds and we get 728 01:04:28,400 --> 01:04:34,400 used to it and see how it goes. It's not to say that it can't be revisited. We 729 01:04:32,079 --> 01:04:38,799 can make amendments to this. Um it would be a repeal and and a new bylaw uh put 730 01:04:36,960 --> 01:04:42,000 in place. So it's you know your your hands are not completely tied that you 731 01:04:40,400 --> 01:04:47,359 can't adjust this again for two years, right? Something comes up that we find 732 01:04:44,000 --> 01:04:50,000 out is remarkably not working. Uh then you know we can we can address it. But 733 01:04:49,200 --> 01:04:52,559 um >> something could come up in the 734 01:04:51,039 --> 01:04:57,000 legislation that makes a difference. Yes. 735 01:04:57,760 --> 01:05:04,799 » So, should we pass this bylaw here at the next public meeting, which would put 736 01:05:02,480 --> 01:05:07,440 us into the September? >> Mhm. 737 01:05:05,359 --> 01:05:11,839 » That means our meetings would change for October and into the Wednesday. Now, is 738 01:05:10,480 --> 01:05:14,400 it it's still going to be the first Wednesday and the third Wednesday? 739 01:05:13,119 --> 01:05:16,400 » No, it's not. It's going to be the second Wednesday and the fourth 740 01:05:15,760 --> 01:05:20,559 Wednesday. >> Second and fourth. Yeah. Okay. 741 01:05:17,920 --> 01:05:24,400 » Uh and that that aligns with um the service commission. They've been doing 742 01:05:21,839 --> 01:05:29,119 theirs on the third. Yeah, [snorts] >> I think too is when we do get to the 743 01:05:26,480 --> 01:05:33,599 21st and we are going to do this by just like if it's I think it's important that 744 01:05:31,359 --> 01:05:37,839 maybe a document be prepared to highlight some of the changes just to 745 01:05:35,760 --> 01:05:41,599 read out to like the Wednesday meetings the public comments the public 746 01:05:40,160 --> 01:05:45,920 presentations are going to you know what I mean just a few of the really 747 01:05:42,880 --> 01:05:48,720 highlights that affect the public >> so that they know 748 01:05:47,119 --> 01:05:51,599 » yeah that's a good idea changes yeah we can uh we can put a little cheat sheet 749 01:05:50,960 --> 01:05:54,720 together for >> yeah just because we're not going be 750 01:05:53,119 --> 01:05:57,760 reading it. And even if you did read it fully in its entirety, by the time the 751 01:05:56,319 --> 01:06:00,000 public left, they wouldn't still know what it was, what the highlights were. 752 01:05:59,680 --> 01:06:03,400 So, >> no, I know. 753 01:06:07,760 --> 01:06:14,079 » Okay. I mean, if council's uh satisfied with that, uh we'll bang that out one 754 01:06:12,960 --> 01:06:18,880 way or another, you're going to get it. It might be a little bit later tonight, 755 01:06:15,280 --> 01:06:22,400 but you'll get it tonight. Um so unless there's any feedback from 756 01:06:21,039 --> 01:06:24,480 council I think we could probably move on. 757 01:06:22,960 --> 01:06:29,839 » Okay. So I can move right to um we don't have 758 01:06:27,920 --> 01:06:35,440 anything presentation with council no administration stuff. So we'll go right 759 01:06:31,599 --> 01:06:40,480 to section 9 adjournment >> motion 110 that the meeting be adjourned 760 01:06:37,839 --> 01:06:45,200 at 2:35 p.m. >> I need a mover. 761 01:06:43,760 --> 01:06:48,400 So move >> seconder. 762 01:06:46,160 --> 01:06:51,920 » I'll second >> the question. 763 01:06:50,240 --> 01:06:56,839 All those in favor signify by raising your hand. Motion carried.