1 00:00:59,199 --> 00:01:04,760 Call meeting to order. Pledge of allegiance. Council member Davidson. 2 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:15,280 To the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for it 3 00:01:10,960 --> 00:01:20,119 stands. One nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. 4 00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:26,320 » [snorts] >> Roll call, please. 5 00:01:25,439 --> 00:01:27,759 » Mayor Larkkey, >> here. 6 00:01:26,799 --> 00:01:29,360 » Council member White, >> here. 7 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:30,880 » Council member Thompson, >> here. 8 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:32,479 » Council member Davidson, >> here. 9 00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:34,159 » Council member Bryan, >> here. 10 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:35,920 » Council member Lawson, >> here. 11 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:37,680 » Council member Richardson >> here. 12 00:01:36,479 --> 00:01:39,360 » Council member McCllum >> here. 13 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:44,000 » Council member Johnson >> here. 14 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:48,399 » We have a quorum. D. No presentations. E. Personal appearances. Each person 15 00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:51,040 list on the agenda to address the city council should step up to the microphone 16 00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:57,479 and state the name and address for the record and limit the remarks to five 17 00:01:52,479 --> 00:01:57,479 minutes. Number one, Jim Shipley. 18 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:11,840 I'm Jim Shipley of 8105 East 195th Street, Belton, Missouri. Thank you for 19 00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:14,640 the opportunity to speak. My wife and I Is the speaker working? 20 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:19,120 » Yeah. >> Yeah, it's working. Yeah, 21 00:02:16,239 --> 00:02:25,200 » my wife and I have lived on 195th Street between Peculiar Drive and Mullen Road 22 00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:31,200 for 34 years. We purchased our home on 2 acres a year after we were married. In 23 00:02:28,879 --> 00:02:35,519 fact, our 35th wedding anniversary is later this week. 24 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:41,200 Up until this spring, we have loved living in our home on 195th Street. We 25 00:02:38,879 --> 00:02:48,239 love the area and have never had any reason to want to move away until now. 26 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:53,200 You might ask what's happened. We along with our neighbors became aware Belton 27 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:59,599 was proposing to amend the 2050 comprehensive plan and transform the 600 28 00:02:56,560 --> 00:03:04,640 acres of farmland across the street from us and our neighbors into a business 29 00:03:02,319 --> 00:03:09,360 park. The 2050 comprehensive plan that was 30 00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:15,760 approved by the city council in late 2024 designated the farmland across the 31 00:03:12,879 --> 00:03:20,159 street from our front door as single family residential. 32 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:25,120 We soon discovered that Belton's plan for a business park was actually to 33 00:03:23,200 --> 00:03:32,000 provide for the development of this farmland into a superersized warehouse 34 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:36,879 complex by Scanel Properties, similar to the Raymore Commerce Center on the east 35 00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:41,840 side of the interstate. The big difference is that there is no single 36 00:03:38,959 --> 00:03:48,319 family residential housing adjacent or even visible to the Raymore Commerce 37 00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:53,519 Center. Our front door faces north towards the farmland along with the 38 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:58,239 front doors of my neighbors all along 195th Street. 39 00:03:55,760 --> 00:04:02,720 If the 3.3 million square f feet warehouse development is allowed by 40 00:04:00,239 --> 00:04:08,239 Belton, our homes will forever be changed due to us having to look out 41 00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:13,519 from our front doors, our front windows, and our front yards at millions of 42 00:04:10,799 --> 00:04:19,519 square feet of 50 foot tall or taller warehouses and semitrs and trailers only 43 00:04:17,600 --> 00:04:22,800 a few hundred feet from the front of our homes. 44 00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:28,000 We will be looking directly at semi-truckss coming and going to the 45 00:04:24,800 --> 00:04:33,199 warehouses from dozens of loading docks 24 hours a day. This area is not 46 00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:37,919 appropriate for an industrial development of warehouses. There are 47 00:04:35,759 --> 00:04:43,360 traffic concerns, drainage concerns, noise concerns, and 48 00:04:41,280 --> 00:04:47,280 air pollution concerns that such a development will have on our residential 49 00:04:45,280 --> 00:04:52,000 properties. Matt Wright has been meeting with Scanel 50 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:55,840 Properties for well over one year. Drawings have been developed that show 51 00:04:53,600 --> 00:05:00,479 the placement of seven superiz warehouses on this farmland across from 52 00:04:58,639 --> 00:05:04,880 our homes. Some of the individual warehouse 53 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:10,320 buildings are over one quarter mile in length. That's over four football fields 54 00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:15,840 in length. And that is some of the individual warehouse buildings. 55 00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:21,840 These warehouses can be constructed to a height of 50 feet or more. 56 00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:27,680 Scanel is now actively marketing this proposed warehouse development on the 57 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:32,800 worldwide web. It's on the Kansas City Kansas City area development council's 58 00:05:29,919 --> 00:05:41,000 website listed under real estate offerings. Belton's assistant city 59 00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:41,000 manager has already responded to RFIs. 60 00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:49,759 How is this being allowed? There's been no public hearing with the 61 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:55,039 planning commission. There's been no amendment to the 2050 comprehensive 62 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:59,840 plan. There's been no annexation of the property. There's been no reszoning 63 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:04,080 change from the current agriculture designation. And there's been no 64 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:09,919 addressing this issue with the city council to my knowledge. And there's 65 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:16,240 been no approval from the council. I am requesting the city to adhere to the 66 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:21,759 2050 comprehensive plan that the council approved in 2024. 67 00:06:18,639 --> 00:06:26,800 A plan that made sense in 2024 and it still makes sense today. And I request 68 00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:33,280 the city to plan and guide development on the 600 acre efforts property in 69 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:38,880 accordance with the approved plan which designated the majority of this area as 70 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:43,919 single family residential. The owner of the 600 acres, Mr. Mike 71 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:49,759 Efforts, was even a member of the steering committee that developed the 72 00:06:45,759 --> 00:06:55,520 2050 comprehensive plan. In closing, I would like to read from the 2050 belt 73 00:06:51,680 --> 00:07:02,240 and comprehensive plan, page 44 titled Graham efforts sub area. It lists three 74 00:06:59,440 --> 00:07:07,360 key recommendations for this sub area. residents discuss the need for a variety 75 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:11,759 of housing types and regional. >> Sorry, sir, your time's up. 76 00:07:09,280 --> 00:07:14,160 » Can I have another 20 30 seconds, please? 77 00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:17,759 » Go ahead, wrap it up, please. >> Residents discuss the need for variety 78 00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:22,639 of housing types and regional draws to Belton. This sub area responds back to 79 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:27,199 these desires. Number two, discourage any major development or disturbance to 80 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:31,520 the flood plane to ensure it is preserved long term. And the number 81 00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:35,919 three key recommendation was consider opportunities to develop a golf course 82 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:39,520 in the sub area and construct luxury housing around its perimeter. 83 00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:46,479 Participants shared the need for high-end move up housing in Belton as 84 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:50,720 there is currently a limited stock resulting in residents having to move 85 00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:58,120 outside of the community to obtain a larger house. Thank you for your time. 86 00:07:54,879 --> 00:07:58,120 » Thank you. 87 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:10,000 Item F, appeal to the city council pursuant to RSMO610.021.1 88 00:08:05,919 --> 00:08:13,759 021.1 sub paragraph 1. Documents may be furnished without charge or at a reduced 89 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:17,039 ch charge when the public governmental body determines that the waiver or 90 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:20,720 reduction of the fee is in the public interest because it's likely to 91 00:08:18,479 --> 00:08:23,520 contribute significantly to public understanding the operation or 92 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:29,039 activities of the public governmental body and is not primarily in the 93 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:37,680 commercial interest of the requesttor. Number one, Steven Bodka. Hey, council. 94 00:08:32,719 --> 00:08:42,479 I'm here on item F1, an appeal of $682.7 in fees on a records request about the 95 00:08:39,680 --> 00:08:46,720 city's license plate reader system. One request before I start. Last time I 96 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:51,120 stood here on a fee waver, this the discussion turned to my character. I was 97 00:08:48,880 --> 00:08:55,600 called a man with a personal vendetta. No document was disputed and no figure 98 00:08:53,360 --> 00:08:59,360 was challenged. Tonight, I ask we stay on the question printed at the top of 99 00:08:57,279 --> 00:09:02,959 this agenda. Does this request contribute significantly to public 100 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:06,800 understanding of the operations of this city? 101 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:11,120 Now, what's being charged for? The clerk's office produced six of eight 102 00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:14,480 categories at no cost. It's an overall improvement from the response I received 103 00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:19,600 in May, which the city itself described as neither an official nor comprehensive 104 00:09:16,959 --> 00:09:27,040 correspondence search. Two questions remain, and both carry a price. Question 105 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:32,560 six is $181.82, 82 just 12 months of audit logs and it's who searched the 106 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:39,279 system when and for what stated reason. Question eight, this one cost $500.25 107 00:09:36,800 --> 00:09:43,600 and it's just complaints that residents sent about these cameras and how the 108 00:09:40,959 --> 00:09:48,800 city answered. Not footage, not plate data, nothing about any individual, just 109 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:53,519 who looked, when, and why. And did anyone object? I want to be precise 110 00:09:51,680 --> 00:09:57,360 because this is where it matters. The fourth amendment protects the right of 111 00:09:55,120 --> 00:10:02,480 the people to be secure in the person's papers, houses, and effects against 112 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:06,880 unreasonable searches and seizures. A single photograph of a plate on a public 113 00:10:04,560 --> 00:10:11,440 street is not a search. The courts have been clear. Your plate is visible to 114 00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:16,480 anyone. One camera, one car, one time, no constitutional question. But that's 115 00:10:13,839 --> 00:10:20,240 not what a camera network is. In Carpenter versus the United States in 116 00:10:18,320 --> 00:10:24,079 2018, the Supreme Court held that collecting a person's location history 117 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:28,160 over time is different in kind from observing them once. Chief Justice 118 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:33,120 Roberts wrote, "It gives the government an intimate window into a person's life, 119 00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:37,360 reveal revealing familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual 120 00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:41,880 associations." And the court said this technology runs against everyone. 121 00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:49,680 That unlike a traditional search, it requires no suspicion, no warrant, no 122 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:54,000 reason at all. Six years earlier in United States versus Jones, Justice 123 00:10:51,839 --> 00:10:59,279 Sodom Mayor wrote that the aggregated location de data reveals trips to the 124 00:10:56,880 --> 00:11:03,360 psychiatrist, the plastic surgeon, the abortion clinic, the AIDS treatment 125 00:11:00,959 --> 00:11:07,839 center, the strip club, the criminal defense attorney, the by the hour motel, 126 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:12,880 the union meeting, the mosque, synagogue, or church. The constitutional 127 00:11:10,560 --> 00:11:17,680 line isn't drawn at the camera. It's drawn at how much is collected, how long 128 00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:22,720 it's kept, and how freely it's searched. One document answer answers that. And 129 00:11:20,399 --> 00:11:25,920 it's the audit log. A handful of searches tied to a real investigations 130 00:11:24,560 --> 00:11:31,279 means the system works the way you intended and the question never arises. 131 00:11:28,399 --> 00:11:34,800 Thousands of queries, agencies outside of Missouri, or searches with no stated 132 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:39,440 reason means it's a different system than the one council approved. Nobody in 133 00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:44,079 this room knows which one it is, including you. 134 00:11:41,600 --> 00:11:48,240 There's a structural problem. Under Missouri law, a citizen can be charged 135 00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:52,560 for the labor of producing records about how their government used power on them. 136 00:11:50,560 --> 00:11:56,880 That's legal. I'm not disputing the calculation. But look what it means in 137 00:11:54,560 --> 00:12:01,760 practice. The body deciding whether the fee gets waved is the same body whose 138 00:11:59,120 --> 00:12:06,560 operations are being examined. You're being asked tonight to price access your 139 00:12:03,920 --> 00:12:10,320 own record. Nobody here created that, but that's how the statute is built. But 140 00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:13,760 it means only one thing is standing between the government and pricing 141 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:18,079 accountability out of reach. And that is the government choosing not to. Tonight, 142 00:12:15,839 --> 00:12:21,920 that choice is yours. [snorts] And I want to be accurate because this matters 143 00:12:19,519 --> 00:12:26,399 to the argument. The council did approve these cameras in public four separate 144 00:12:23,680 --> 00:12:30,320 times. But approving something in public is not the same as having the public 145 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:34,320 having a say in it. Nobody in Belton voted on this. There was no ballot 146 00:12:32,160 --> 00:12:38,560 question, no hearing where residents weighed whether they wanted their 147 00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:42,320 movements recorded. A resolution just passed on a Tuesday night meeting and 148 00:12:40,560 --> 00:12:47,120 the rest of us found out later if we found out at all. I'm not saying that 149 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:50,959 that was unlawful. I'm saying it's the reason the audit log matters. When 150 00:12:48,959 --> 00:12:55,600 people affected by a system never got to vote on whether it exists, they're at 151 00:12:53,279 --> 00:13:00,480 least owed the ability to see how it's being used. Authorization isn't the 152 00:12:57,839 --> 00:13:04,480 question. Operation is. And you've already applied the standard in June. On 153 00:13:02,560 --> 00:13:08,079 June 9th, this body granted a fee waiver on a different request of mine, finding 154 00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:12,720 it in public interest by likely contributing to the significant 155 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:16,480 by likely contributing significantly to public understanding of the operations 156 00:13:14,399 --> 00:13:21,600 or activities of the city. Same requesttor, same statute, same standard. 157 00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:25,200 That one is about a road. This one is about a system that photographs every 158 00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:29,200 vehicle that passes it in a city where the city clerk confirmed in writing on 159 00:13:26,959 --> 00:13:34,399 August 25th that the police department keeps no complaint log at all. 160 00:13:32,079 --> 00:13:38,240 I have one question for public works. While photographing camera locations, I 161 00:13:36,720 --> 00:13:42,000 noticed at least three installations mounted on poles that don't appear to 162 00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:45,440 have breakaway bases. I'm not an engineer. I don't know whether those sit 163 00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:49,519 inside a clear zone where breakaway hardware is required under MDOT or 164 00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:53,839 Ashtto standards, but someone should answer it. Fix objects in a clear zone 165 00:13:51,519 --> 00:13:58,399 are known hazard and runoff road crashes, and that's why the standard 166 00:13:55,839 --> 00:14:01,839 exists. I'd ask this council to direct public works to confirm whether those 167 00:14:00,079 --> 00:14:05,519 installations were reviewed and make that review available. 168 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:11,040 And now what I'm asking for tonight is to wave the fee under RS MO610, 169 00:14:09,120 --> 00:14:16,320 the statute printed on your own agenda tonight. If you deny it, the 170 00:14:12,800 --> 00:14:20,079 determination on record, the statute requires this body to determine whether 171 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:24,000 this request serves the public interest. That's the legal standard and it's the 172 00:14:22,480 --> 00:14:28,880 thing that was missing the last time a waiver was denied. Here's what I'd ask 173 00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:34,079 you to sit with before you vote. Nobody in Belton voted on whether this system 174 00:14:30,720 --> 00:14:38,320 exists. No ballot question, no form, no no way to decline, just the resolution 175 00:14:36,639 --> 00:14:43,279 passed and every resident who drives through this town has been photographed 176 00:14:40,399 --> 00:14:49,199 ever since. That was legal. But the one record showing whether that power is 177 00:14:44,959 --> 00:14:52,880 being used properly cost $682.7. So if you deny this, the position 178 00:14:50,959 --> 00:14:57,360 becomes we collected information about you without asking and now you can pay 179 00:14:55,199 --> 00:15:01,440 to find out what we did with it. And I don't think anyone on this dis set out 180 00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:05,440 to build that. But something has changed since 2021. When this was approved, most 181 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:09,519 people in Belton didn't know what a license plate reader was, let alone that 182 00:15:07,760 --> 00:15:13,600 the Fourth Amendment has anything to say about aggregated location data. But 183 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:17,120 that's not true anymore. People are reading Carpenter and they're filling 184 00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:21,279 out their own requests. They're asking Cass County the same questions about the 185 00:15:19,040 --> 00:15:25,360 same system. A council can approve whether it's legally whatever it's 186 00:15:23,040 --> 00:15:29,360 legally permitted to approve, but once the people it was approve approved over 187 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:34,160 start reading the law for themselves, the arrangement changes and it doesn't 188 00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:38,240 change back. One vote decides whether Belton is the city that showed its work 189 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:41,240 or the city that charged for it. Thank you. 190 00:15:44,639 --> 00:15:47,680 » Any questions? 191 00:15:49,105 --> 00:15:55,519 » [snorts] >> Go ahead. 192 00:15:53,519 --> 00:15:57,519 » I guess someone if we wanted to move forward with this needs to make a 193 00:15:56,639 --> 00:16:00,880 motion. Correct. >> Correct. 194 00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:05,040 » Go ahead. >> Um would we consider these two requests 195 00:16:03,360 --> 00:16:10,320 separately? If there was a motion, 196 00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:13,360 » you could again just like last time where you guys were determining whether 197 00:16:11,519 --> 00:16:18,079 or not I do believe council member White might have made a motion to just 198 00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:23,821 partially wave them. It is up to the city council's discretion as to how much 199 00:16:20,160 --> 00:16:27,680 you wave or how you wave it. [snorts] 200 00:16:25,199 --> 00:16:33,680 » Is there I mean that's a valid point. Is there is there interest in tackling 201 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:39,120 these two separately? I'd be comfortable with that. 202 00:16:35,199 --> 00:16:44,079 » Yeah. Um the first request regarding audit and usage records, I'm more 203 00:16:41,440 --> 00:16:49,120 comfortable considering a waiver and making those results public. I think the 204 00:16:46,399 --> 00:16:54,720 second request I don't know that that necessarily 205 00:16:50,720 --> 00:17:01,000 serves the public good. Um I don't know. I' I've got mixed feelings 206 00:16:56,639 --> 00:17:01,000 about the two separate issues. 207 00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:09,000 » Go ahead. I think it's fine to take them separately. I have the same concerns as 208 00:17:05,439 --> 00:17:09,000 council member Lawson. 209 00:17:09,280 --> 00:17:13,480 » Anybody over here have anything? 210 00:17:17,120 --> 00:17:24,480 » All right. Can uh Patrick, can you help me out with some language here? 211 00:17:21,919 --> 00:17:29,280 » Um yes, that would be what is it? Is it request four and six or six and eight? 212 00:17:26,959 --> 00:17:34,559 » Six and eight. So that would be a motion approving the waiver of fees and 213 00:17:31,360 --> 00:17:40,559 determining it in the public interest uh regarding request six 214 00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:47,120 of the sunshine law request submitted by Steven Vaka on 215 00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:53,120 » August 15th. >> Moved. So moved. 216 00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:58,160 » We have a motion and a second. Any more discussion on 217 00:17:55,679 --> 00:18:03,679 on a question? So this is wavering partial. 218 00:18:01,679 --> 00:18:09,600 » No, this is just this is just waving him on question six on his on his list. Can 219 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:14,720 someone explain what that is? >> Yes. Question six from the letter was 220 00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:18,720 audit and usage records on the memo that's in the council agenda packet. 221 00:18:16,240 --> 00:18:22,880 It's listed as number one >> which 222 00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:28,640 is hold on. Can you explain that a little better? 223 00:18:26,080 --> 00:18:33,200 audit usage what what he's asking. Can you explain 224 00:18:30,559 --> 00:18:36,559 what that is a little better? >> I'm sorry. I was answering a question 225 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:39,440 for Chief Sap. What was the question again? 226 00:18:37,280 --> 00:18:43,600 » Can you explain what the audits audit and usage log that he's requesting what 227 00:18:41,679 --> 00:18:46,080 that is in a little bit more detail, please? 228 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:51,919 » That would be a detailed log that we get from Flock itself. it would require a uh 229 00:18:49,679 --> 00:18:56,000 system administrator to get and that's one of the reasons that the cost was so 230 00:18:54,000 --> 00:19:01,760 high because it can only come from one person. 231 00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:08,280 » Okay, that answer your question Brett. Did that answer your question? [snorts] 232 00:19:04,799 --> 00:19:08,280 » Anybody else? 233 00:19:08,320 --> 00:19:16,480 » Um since we are in discussion, uh can we ask a question of the 234 00:19:15,120 --> 00:19:20,080 presenter? Yeah, 235 00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:24,960 » if comfortable, Mr. Vaka, would you be willing to just kind of explain the uh 236 00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:28,720 you know, I guess purpose of the request in terms of 237 00:19:26,880 --> 00:19:31,600 less I understood I understood the philosophical piece of what you just 238 00:19:30,080 --> 00:19:36,720 described, but I guess more of like what the um intent is to produce with the 239 00:19:35,120 --> 00:19:42,960 data. Uh, I'm going to report regardless on 240 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:47,760 what our outcomes are of just this vote decision tonight, but ultimately I'd 241 00:19:45,679 --> 00:19:52,640 like to report that the systems being used in the way that it was approved of, 242 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:56,559 but I could also report [snorts] what I find when the logs are revealed. That's 243 00:19:55,039 --> 00:19:58,480 ultimately what my goal is. I want transparency. 244 00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:01,360 What >> And [snorts] when you say report, can 245 00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:04,720 you clarify what you mean by that? >> Same thing I did with the North Cast 246 00:20:02,799 --> 00:20:07,200 Parkway. I just made Facebook posts. >> Okay. 247 00:20:07,280 --> 00:20:12,799 Thank you. Go ahead. >> Um, Chief Lines, you've spoken to us 248 00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:17,440 before about the audit logs and usage and our internal controls for the 249 00:20:14,880 --> 00:20:21,039 automated license plate reader data. Do you mind refreshing our memory on how 250 00:20:19,600 --> 00:20:25,280 your department manages this information? 251 00:20:22,160 --> 00:20:29,360 » Uh, the data is 30 days and so we can go back over 30 days and we do that 252 00:20:27,039 --> 00:20:34,640 monthly. It's also in our transparency portal. You can actually pull it up and 253 00:20:31,600 --> 00:20:39,039 look at the last 30 days. uh but to go beyond that is a deeper search that we 254 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:44,320 have to go into the system and get that from flock and that's done through the 255 00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:50,799 system administrator having access and then with help on the back end of it. 256 00:20:48,240 --> 00:20:55,360 I remember reviewing the transparency portal last time you mentioned this. Um, 257 00:20:53,840 --> 00:21:00,000 I'll just point it out to the council that a retroactive search going back 12 258 00:20:58,480 --> 00:21:03,360 months, I I would be comfortable waving that, 259 00:21:01,679 --> 00:21:07,360 but I would make it known to the public that if you're not making use of the 260 00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:11,760 transparency portal and monitoring and and keeping us honest that way, I will 261 00:21:09,919 --> 00:21:16,720 not feel comfortable continually waving these at the cost to the city to pull 262 00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:20,080 these retroactive reports. So, that's my two cents. 263 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:25,760 » Yeah. Yeah, and I'll just to add to that because that's a good point of which is 264 00:21:22,640 --> 00:21:29,760 the transparency portal was became public or created or whatever on 265 00:21:27,440 --> 00:21:35,200 approximately when >> uh we did that about um gosh what was 266 00:21:32,559 --> 00:21:40,240 that presentation maybe 60 days ago. >> Okay. 267 00:21:36,799 --> 00:21:43,679 So retroactively there's some point to be made. 268 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:46,960 » Go ahead. So any person in any citizen of Belton or any person who's been 269 00:21:45,600 --> 00:21:50,240 driving through Belton could request through the transparency portal 270 00:21:48,559 --> 00:21:55,039 information about whether their license plate has been reviewed. 271 00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:58,039 » Yes, you could go on that portal and look. 272 00:21:59,760 --> 00:22:05,135 » Go ahead. >> I have another question for Mr. Vaka. 273 00:22:03,115 --> 00:22:05,135 [snorts] 274 00:22:05,679 --> 00:22:12,159 » Have you used the free transparency portal? 275 00:22:09,840 --> 00:22:16,799 Not yet because I went through the sunshine request which is my right. 276 00:22:14,240 --> 00:22:19,600 » I I understand that. I I would think you would want to start there and find 277 00:22:18,080 --> 00:22:22,799 something that would make it an easier decision. 278 00:22:20,080 --> 00:22:28,720 » The transparency portal is only going to show what wants to be shown. 279 00:22:25,919 --> 00:22:34,600 Whereas again he just said we're only keeping 30 days. How much data is flock 280 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,600 keeping? 281 00:22:35,679 --> 00:22:42,799 » All right. Does it go back 90? Does it go back a year? How much data are they 282 00:22:41,120 --> 00:22:47,840 keeping on us? What all are they recording us for? 283 00:22:45,919 --> 00:22:52,799 I mean, we've already been told that it's pattern recognition, too. If the if 284 00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:57,280 the system flags another vehicle following you multiple times, you're now 285 00:22:55,919 --> 00:23:02,880 put in the system. How do you get removed from the system? Do we have back 286 00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:07,520 ways for that? Chief Lines, I'd ask you to address his 287 00:23:05,280 --> 00:23:13,200 assertion that what is available on the transparency portal is in any way 288 00:23:11,039 --> 00:23:18,080 modified or restricted. >> I I don't believe so. But when we go 289 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:23,280 back 12 months, what I've seen of that data is you do not see license plates. 290 00:23:20,640 --> 00:23:29,440 You don't see you only see uh date, time, location, you see reason. And so 291 00:23:26,799 --> 00:23:36,240 it's even limited to what is out there past that 30 days. And that is more of 292 00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:42,960 who actually searched. And that could be an agency in Florida that runs a plate 293 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:48,000 that comes as a search on your your actual flock. Anybody that you're 294 00:23:45,760 --> 00:23:51,360 sharing data with. >> Thank you. 295 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:54,960 » And I'll just say I think this is the same concern I brought up previously 296 00:23:52,880 --> 00:23:58,240 when we had the work session, uh, which is that it sounds like our internal 297 00:23:56,720 --> 00:24:04,880 controls are actually quite robust. and I appreciate that and I I think that's a 298 00:24:00,880 --> 00:24:09,200 very important part of Belton. Um the problem comes 299 00:24:06,799 --> 00:24:14,480 external controls that we don't have any control over. Um and whether or not 300 00:24:12,480 --> 00:24:17,840 those players are potentially using our data appropriately and so there's I 301 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:21,080 don't know there's some concern there for sure. 302 00:24:22,159 --> 00:24:25,640 » Anybody else? 303 00:24:26,159 --> 00:24:36,480 » Go ahead. So we are voting on one >> voting on his question six about u it's 304 00:24:34,960 --> 00:24:42,039 18182 >> which is 305 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:42,039 » number one in the packet 306 00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:49,600 » go ahead you have something else anybody else 307 00:24:48,880 --> 00:24:52,559 » Mr. Mayor. >> Yeah. Go ahead. 308 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:58,880 » I just want to remind the council that the standard um here is that this is in 309 00:24:55,440 --> 00:25:03,440 the public interest to wave the fee. Um just might want to remind the council 310 00:25:01,039 --> 00:25:08,320 that the same individual made the same plea previously and levied dozens of 311 00:25:06,480 --> 00:25:15,600 baseless accusations against staff and the council. Um and then has made no uh 312 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:19,440 attempts to uh correct the record even though the records show that those 313 00:25:17,200 --> 00:25:22,440 accusations were false. You'll give me a list. 314 00:25:30,559 --> 00:25:35,520 » Anybody else? >> Hearing none. All in favor? 315 00:25:35,200 --> 00:25:38,159 » I >> I 316 00:25:36,960 --> 00:25:38,720 » All oppose. >> No. 317 00:25:38,480 --> 00:25:41,840 » No. >> No. 318 00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:48,080 » Can you please state? >> Can you do a roll call? 319 00:25:45,360 --> 00:25:50,559 » Yes, I can. Council member Johnson, 320 00:25:49,440 --> 00:25:52,720 » no. >> McCllum, 321 00:25:51,440 --> 00:25:55,279 » I >> Richardson, 322 00:25:53,520 --> 00:25:57,679 » hi. >> Lawson, 323 00:25:55,919 --> 00:26:00,640 » I. >> Mayor Larkkey, 324 00:25:58,640 --> 00:26:03,919 » no. >> Council member Bryan, 325 00:26:01,840 --> 00:26:06,720 » no. >> Council member Davidson, 326 00:26:05,120 --> 00:26:09,039 » yes. >> Council member Thompson, 327 00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:13,320 » no. >> Council member White, 328 00:26:10,320 --> 00:26:13,320 » I 329 00:26:14,320 --> 00:26:19,200 passed. >> Yeah. Motion passes. 330 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:25,080 All right. 331 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:29,480 Anybody else? 332 00:26:29,520 --> 00:26:36,880 » I'll I'll bite. Uh, Mr. City Attorney, can you help me again? 333 00:26:35,200 --> 00:26:41,760 » Uh, a motion approving the waiver of fees associated 334 00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:43,679 with the Steven Vodka's Sorry, I forget the date again. What was it? 335 00:26:42,880 --> 00:26:48,480 » August 15th. >> August 15th. Sunshine Law Request 336 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:53,640 question eight as they are in the public interest. 337 00:26:50,400 --> 00:26:53,640 » So moved. 338 00:26:58,159 --> 00:27:03,163 » I'll second. >> We have a motion and a second. [snorts] 339 00:27:04,080 --> 00:27:12,799 » Go ahead. [snorts] >> All right. Um I'm 340 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:18,200 trying to this one specifically. I'd like to better understand 341 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:18,200 um 342 00:27:19,360 --> 00:27:25,919 the the concern. I mean the the I guess I'm trying to understand the data and 343 00:27:23,840 --> 00:27:34,080 I'm hoping uh city staff can help me understand what this data looks like and 344 00:27:28,880 --> 00:27:38,320 why we're getting to such a high cost. >> Yes. with the request for all complaints 345 00:27:36,640 --> 00:27:43,760 and inquiries and correspondence received by staff from the public. That 346 00:27:41,039 --> 00:27:49,120 will require an IT query of the date range and 347 00:27:46,480 --> 00:27:55,840 the correspondence that staff has had with members of the public. To find the 348 00:27:53,760 --> 00:27:59,919 questions, the answers back to the members of the public will have to do a 349 00:27:57,440 --> 00:28:04,320 second query with the email addresses that are discovered from the first 350 00:28:01,679 --> 00:28:08,399 query. So basically is it am I understanding 351 00:28:06,159 --> 00:28:13,279 correctly that it comes to a time of resources situation? 352 00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:18,480 » Yes. on in the memo it states the amount of 353 00:28:15,600 --> 00:28:22,960 time that will be from my office and then because this is the PD server the 354 00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:28,080 police department will also need to review the findings to ensure that 355 00:28:26,320 --> 00:28:31,279 there aren't any active cases that would need to be closed or other closed 356 00:28:29,679 --> 00:28:36,679 information that I wouldn't be aware of >> things that might be currently 357 00:28:32,640 --> 00:28:36,679 investigated that kind of thing. 358 00:28:37,120 --> 00:28:50,240 » Okay. I was just uh I was just very curious on the frontier of um 359 00:28:45,840 --> 00:28:57,120 of the complaints in that situation. So, thank you for the explanation. 360 00:28:53,760 --> 00:29:02,960 » Anybody else? >> Do you have anything since you want to 361 00:28:59,039 --> 00:29:09,279 separate it out? Um, I just don't see the need um for the requesttor to access 362 00:29:07,360 --> 00:29:14,559 this information. Um, if he is interested in public opinion on the 363 00:29:12,240 --> 00:29:20,080 cameras or concerns, he's very good at engaging on Facebook and could request 364 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:23,760 folks chime into him there. Also, I have a feeling that when some people email us 365 00:29:21,840 --> 00:29:27,520 or the city, it is not a matter it is not intended to be a matter of public 366 00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:31,200 record. Uh, conversely, people will come to the council meetings much like you 367 00:29:29,039 --> 00:29:38,000 have and and state their opinions, but I don't think any email that a ward member 368 00:29:34,880 --> 00:29:42,000 sends to me um is up to your scrutiny necessarily. And so, in protecting 369 00:29:40,000 --> 00:29:44,799 residents who just have questions or want to communicate with their council 370 00:29:43,279 --> 00:29:48,640 member, I don't understand the value to the public for that. They could also 371 00:29:47,039 --> 00:29:54,159 make those statements publicly. And you're welcome to invite them to do so. 372 00:29:52,000 --> 00:29:58,159 » Go ahead. Yeah, I 373 00:29:55,039 --> 00:30:03,600 » piggybacking on uh what Councilman Lawson said is um 374 00:30:01,760 --> 00:30:07,600 he has the right to ask. >> Sure. 375 00:30:04,159 --> 00:30:13,679 » And uh I support that right, but at the same time I don't think it rises to the 376 00:30:09,440 --> 00:30:18,000 level of public and so um u he has a right to ask and the right to be charged 377 00:30:15,600 --> 00:30:23,120 for the time that it takes to do that. So that's kind of where I'm at at this. 378 00:30:21,520 --> 00:30:27,120 Patrick, if Sorry. >> No, go ahead. Um, go ahead. 379 00:30:25,120 --> 00:30:31,440 » Mr. City Attorney, if you wouldn't mind again, um, the last time we were 380 00:30:28,880 --> 00:30:35,440 weighing these waiverss. Um, you mentioned like obstructionist requests 381 00:30:33,919 --> 00:30:39,120 or would you just refresh our memories on? 382 00:30:36,960 --> 00:30:42,080 » Uh, yeah, that was a bigger issue uh, probably a couple years ago. The 383 00:30:40,799 --> 00:30:47,440 Missouri legislaturator has kind of fine-tuned that nowadays, but there have 384 00:30:44,720 --> 00:30:52,240 been in the past. Um I've dealt with one early on in my career in another city 385 00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:57,039 also similarly about a development that was going into an area where single 386 00:30:54,240 --> 00:31:01,919 family homes were nearby that caused quite a bit of contention. Um and in 387 00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:06,480 that case the requester was essentially able due to just voluminous requests 388 00:31:04,000 --> 00:31:10,240 able to pretty much shut down most city operations. Um, and that can occur. 389 00:31:08,799 --> 00:31:15,279 Again, there are just certain people that have to do certain things. And like 390 00:31:13,279 --> 00:31:19,760 Andrea just mentioned, PD has to review a lot of these emails and files due to 391 00:31:17,520 --> 00:31:24,960 the fact that they could be open investigations or other closed reports. 392 00:31:22,320 --> 00:31:28,559 I might myself and Andrew would probably have to review most to make sure that 393 00:31:26,399 --> 00:31:33,120 there is no personal identifiable information that is also supposed to be 394 00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:40,559 closed under the sunshine law. Um, so these sorts of when a request gets to 395 00:31:35,919 --> 00:31:44,960 the size of, you know, 50 plus staff hours just to work through 396 00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:51,760 it, it does have the unintended consequence of causing other issues to 397 00:31:49,440 --> 00:31:55,200 slow down. And, you know, there's obviously limited resources here at the 398 00:31:53,440 --> 00:31:59,360 city and staff has certain deadlines and obligations that it has to meet. And the 399 00:31:57,519 --> 00:32:05,600 purpose of the Sunshine Law fees is to make sure that a requesttor or anybody 400 00:32:02,320 --> 00:32:08,480 who has triggered that level of work is also the one that is paying for that 401 00:32:07,039 --> 00:32:11,760 level of work instead of the general taxpayers of the city. 402 00:32:10,080 --> 00:32:15,919 » So, did I hear you right that on a request like this with 3500 roughly 403 00:32:14,320 --> 00:32:19,279 emails, you would likely be involved in the review? I don't see any hours 404 00:32:17,679 --> 00:32:21,760 tracked for the city attorney. >> You can't. 405 00:32:20,320 --> 00:32:24,640 » Okay. Just for you though. >> Yeah, but you you can't charge for my 406 00:32:23,440 --> 00:32:30,440 time. >> Okay. Thank you. Anybody 407 00:32:27,440 --> 00:32:30,440 else 408 00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:34,480 » hearing? None. Do a roll call again, please. Andrea. 409 00:32:33,840 --> 00:32:36,480 » Yes. >> Council member Lawson, 410 00:32:35,679 --> 00:32:37,840 » no. >> Johnson, 411 00:32:37,120 --> 00:32:39,120 » no. >> White, 412 00:32:38,399 --> 00:32:40,720 » no. >> Richardson, 413 00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:42,080 » no. >> Davidson, 414 00:32:41,440 --> 00:32:43,360 » no. >> Bryan, 415 00:32:42,799 --> 00:32:44,720 » no. >> Mckllum, 416 00:32:44,240 --> 00:32:46,240 » no. >> Mayor Larkkey, 417 00:32:45,679 --> 00:32:48,559 » no. >> Thompson, 418 00:32:46,960 --> 00:32:53,320 » no. >> That motion fails. 419 00:32:49,919 --> 00:32:53,320 » Motion fails. 420 00:32:55,760 --> 00:33:02,080 Item G, unfinished business. Number one, motion approving the final reading of 421 00:32:59,440 --> 00:33:04,960 bill 2026-43. >> An ordinance approving an amended 422 00:33:03,600 --> 00:33:10,399 development and maintenance agreement between the city of Belton and RPNT 423 00:33:07,279 --> 00:33:12,799 Autumn Woods Holdings LLC for public and private improvements in the Autumn Woods 424 00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:14,720 subdivision. >> Present. 425 00:33:13,519 --> 00:33:18,482 » Second. >> Have a motion in a second. [sighs] 426 00:33:19,519 --> 00:33:26,720 Go ahead. Oh, you don't have anything? You usually do so. 427 00:33:26,288 --> 00:33:29,360 [snorts] >> Go with it. 428 00:33:27,200 --> 00:33:31,440 » Anybody got anything? All right. Roll call. 429 00:33:30,159 --> 00:33:32,640 » Council member Lawson. >> I. 430 00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:33,679 » Johnson. >> I. 431 00:33:33,120 --> 00:33:34,960 » White. >> I. 432 00:33:34,159 --> 00:33:36,159 » Richardson. >> I. 433 00:33:35,440 --> 00:33:37,200 » Davidson. >> Yes. 434 00:33:36,559 --> 00:33:38,320 » Brian. >> I. 435 00:33:37,600 --> 00:33:41,760 » McCllum. >> Nay. 436 00:33:38,799 --> 00:33:43,440 » Mayor Larkkey. >> Nay. 437 00:33:42,559 --> 00:33:48,960 » Thompson. >> No. 438 00:33:46,080 --> 00:33:53,840 » Motion passes. Item two, motion approving final reading 439 00:33:50,799 --> 00:33:56,880 of bill 2026-47, >> an ordinance authorizing the 440 00:33:55,279 --> 00:34:02,000 appropriation and revision of the city of Belton fiscal year 2027 adopted city 441 00:33:59,679 --> 00:34:06,320 budget to cover additional costs for the water meter infrastructure replacement 442 00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:08,960 implementation project and construction at the public works facility. 443 00:34:08,240 --> 00:34:15,240 » Present. >> Second. 444 00:34:09,760 --> 00:34:15,240 » A motion a second. Any discussion 445 00:34:16,079 --> 00:34:19,280 hearing? None. Roll call. >> Council member Bryan. 446 00:34:18,800 --> 00:34:20,720 » Hi. >> Davidson, 447 00:34:20,159 --> 00:34:21,919 » yes. >> Thompson, 448 00:34:21,440 --> 00:34:22,960 » yes. >> White, 449 00:34:22,480 --> 00:34:24,000 » I. >> Johnson, 450 00:34:23,599 --> 00:34:25,200 » I. >> McCllum, 451 00:34:24,720 --> 00:34:26,159 » I. >> Lawson, 452 00:34:25,839 --> 00:34:27,440 » I. >> Mayor Larkkey, 453 00:34:27,040 --> 00:34:29,200 » yes. >> Richardson, 454 00:34:28,240 --> 00:34:34,000 » I. >> Motion passes. 455 00:34:32,320 --> 00:34:38,960 » Item three, motion approving the final reading of bill 2026-48 456 00:34:36,480 --> 00:34:43,679 as amended. an ordinance amending appendix B traffic schedules table 4 457 00:34:41,440 --> 00:34:47,200 speed zones of the code of ordinances of the city of Belton Missouri to establish 458 00:34:45,760 --> 00:34:52,079 certain speed zones >> present 459 00:34:47,919 --> 00:34:55,359 » second motion a second >> what do you got [clears throat] 460 00:34:53,440 --> 00:34:59,760 » so after last time's meeting there was a lot of questions about where should the 461 00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:05,520 beginning of the speed limit change be at so I went and did a couple more speed 462 00:35:03,040 --> 00:35:08,480 studies and I and I just took these photos off of Google so don't think I 463 00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:12,560 have some expert foot and photographer here. I was able to label a street or 464 00:35:10,400 --> 00:35:16,960 anything. So, this is Cleveland looking northbound headed toward Cambridge, the 465 00:35:14,560 --> 00:35:19,920 stop signs at Cambridge. And so, one of the there's a couple things to consider 466 00:35:18,480 --> 00:35:24,240 when you're doing speed limits. One, what's the driver's perception? Is there 467 00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:28,079 a change or there conflicts? Because those are times when people will change 468 00:35:25,920 --> 00:35:32,400 their speeds when something changes in front of them or they or they uh think 469 00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:34,400 that there's a danger ahead of them. Someone's going to stop, someone's going 470 00:35:33,440 --> 00:35:38,720 to pull out, something's going to happen. That's a conflict. And so these 471 00:35:36,480 --> 00:35:42,560 are things that we look for. So this is looking northbound as you're going up. 472 00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:47,680 You cross it, the road looks pretty much the same. No need to change, right? You 473 00:35:45,040 --> 00:35:53,200 keep going up, no need to change. We're still going up. We're south of U 474 00:35:50,880 --> 00:35:57,680 Park Avenue, but north of Cambridge, things looks pretty much the same. Looks 475 00:35:55,280 --> 00:36:01,359 pretty much the same. Looks pretty much the same. Then all a sudden, you start 476 00:35:59,839 --> 00:36:05,040 seeing something different. So you become a little bit more alerted. maybe 477 00:36:02,880 --> 00:36:09,119 I need to slow down and maybe need to make a change. And this is Park Avenue. 478 00:36:07,599 --> 00:36:12,160 And then you start getting closer to where the school's at and you can see a 479 00:36:10,560 --> 00:36:18,640 dramatic change of what's in front of you. And then uh Council Member Johnson 480 00:36:16,400 --> 00:36:23,200 brought up about the difference in speed limit. Now, this is from the same spot. 481 00:36:20,079 --> 00:36:27,520 I just blew up the picture and you can see ahead of you the signs and the 482 00:36:25,119 --> 00:36:30,560 black. That's where the flashers at. So that give you an idea what I'm talking 483 00:36:28,640 --> 00:36:35,520 about. So that's how close the change is. So, we went and did the speed limit 484 00:36:32,800 --> 00:36:40,640 changes. And so, when you back up, when you're in this area, the 85th percentile 485 00:36:38,480 --> 00:36:45,520 speed is about 35 miles an hour. A little bit further to the south is 36, 486 00:36:42,960 --> 00:36:50,880 but it's consistently 35 miles an hour till you get up here to park or just 487 00:36:48,160 --> 00:36:55,440 past right here, the 85th percentile drops to 32. And people are seeing a 488 00:36:53,280 --> 00:37:00,079 reason to slow down and begin slowing down. So having a speed limit that's 489 00:36:57,359 --> 00:37:03,280 that changes at park is going to fit what the circumstances are there. 490 00:37:01,440 --> 00:37:07,040 Hopefully you can see the difference in the areas and the reason why the change 491 00:37:04,960 --> 00:37:12,880 would happen. Now someday if something changes again, for instance, we bring in 492 00:37:09,839 --> 00:37:16,160 a a trail out there or we change what the park looks like, we build a 493 00:37:14,400 --> 00:37:21,359 different entrance for the park, we can revisit it again. This is not like this 494 00:37:18,240 --> 00:37:25,040 is it forever. This is this is it for today and this is the circumstance we 495 00:37:23,040 --> 00:37:28,960 have out there for today. So because of that and what the speeds are and what 496 00:37:26,880 --> 00:37:33,359 how people are reacting, I'd recommend that we have the speed limit change at 497 00:37:31,119 --> 00:37:37,520 Park Avenue. And so it's 35 from the South City limit to Park Avenue, then 25 498 00:37:35,520 --> 00:37:40,480 miles an hour from there north. I'd be happy to answer any questions that you 499 00:37:38,720 --> 00:37:43,839 have. >> Go ahead. 500 00:37:41,280 --> 00:37:47,036 » I just it feels very validating when the data backs me up. [laughter] 501 00:37:47,440 --> 00:37:57,200 » Appreciate it. >> Anybody Go ahead. I'll just say later in 502 00:37:52,400 --> 00:38:02,240 the packet um there's exhibit F for sorry let me catch back up here uh 503 00:37:59,839 --> 00:38:08,240 community development projects which shows the Dryen Nature Preserve reserve 504 00:38:05,280 --> 00:38:12,240 sorry with an entrance and exit between Cambridge and Park on Cleveland and I 505 00:38:10,800 --> 00:38:17,200 hear what you're saying that this isn't a permanent speed limit sign for all 506 00:38:14,480 --> 00:38:21,760 eternity but I think two things to consider one is if we can get drivers in 507 00:38:19,520 --> 00:38:24,720 the habit of reaching Cambridge and being more alert. That'd 508 00:38:23,520 --> 00:38:30,000 be great. And the second thing I was trying to pull up is any school bus 509 00:38:26,240 --> 00:38:33,599 routes that go on Cambridge. Um I've also I recall residents having issues 510 00:38:32,000 --> 00:38:40,079 with what they perceived as speeding along Cambridge. So in my mind that is 511 00:38:36,079 --> 00:38:44,079 still a logical place to alert drivers that they are now in the city and there 512 00:38:42,079 --> 00:38:49,280 are going to be people coming and going. Um it's just my two cents. You're right. 513 00:38:47,040 --> 00:38:53,400 It's not permanent, but I still like the idea of having that start at Cambridge. 514 00:38:54,640 --> 00:39:04,400 » Anybody else? >> So, the motion on the table as amended 515 00:39:01,040 --> 00:39:08,480 is to start at Park Avenue. So, just so you're familiar with what we 516 00:39:06,560 --> 00:39:12,800 did. So, >> the reduction at Park Avenue. 517 00:39:10,320 --> 00:39:18,240 » Yeah, the reduction starts at Park Avenue. I I'll just I'll just throw add 518 00:39:16,160 --> 00:39:22,560 in there. I I agree with Council Member Lawson. Um but I think the most 519 00:39:19,920 --> 00:39:26,720 important piece to this is that this is now and we can always adjust for the 520 00:39:24,880 --> 00:39:30,800 future and I think we should be doing that across the city. You know, we 521 00:39:28,720 --> 00:39:35,599 should always be looking to adjust in the future. I've personally um had to I 522 00:39:34,480 --> 00:39:39,119 don't know deal with is not the right word, but I've experienced that. That's 523 00:39:37,040 --> 00:39:44,640 the word. I've experienced that on and you know in Ward One um right outside my 524 00:39:42,079 --> 00:39:49,520 neighborhood when it uh was changed. So I think uh I think it's you know 525 00:39:47,520 --> 00:39:53,480 important to note for now and we can always adjust in the future. 526 00:39:54,079 --> 00:39:59,760 » Anybody else hearing? None. Roll call. 527 00:39:58,800 --> 00:40:01,280 » Mayor Larkkey. >> Yes. 528 00:40:00,160 --> 00:40:02,320 » Council member Johnson. >> I. 529 00:40:01,680 --> 00:40:03,280 » Brian. >> I. 530 00:40:02,800 --> 00:40:04,400 » White. >> I. 531 00:40:03,680 --> 00:40:05,440 » Richardson. >> I. 532 00:40:04,800 --> 00:40:07,040 » Mallum. >> Hi. 533 00:40:05,920 --> 00:40:09,200 » Lawson. I >> Thompson. 534 00:40:07,839 --> 00:40:12,400 » Yes. Davidson. >> Yes. 535 00:40:10,240 --> 00:40:16,960 » Motion passes. New business. One motion approving the 536 00:40:15,599 --> 00:40:21,760 number one. Motion approving the first reading of bill 2026-49. 537 00:40:19,839 --> 00:40:25,200 » An ordinance authorizing acceptance of funds and execution of a grant agreement 538 00:40:23,680 --> 00:40:29,040 with the Missouri Department of Public Safety from the Emergency Management 539 00:40:27,200 --> 00:40:33,440 Performance Grant for a total award amount of $89,510.30. 540 00:40:32,800 --> 00:40:35,760 » Present. >> Second. 541 00:40:34,240 --> 00:40:38,560 » We have a motion and a second. you're up. 542 00:40:36,320 --> 00:40:42,960 » Uh good evening, mayor and council. Uh each year the city of Belton applies for 543 00:40:40,320 --> 00:40:47,040 the 50% local match emergency management performance grant. This provides 544 00:40:45,200 --> 00:40:50,640 important funding in support of the city's emergency management program. It 545 00:40:48,720 --> 00:40:54,480 helps offset costs um that are associated with maintaining our 546 00:40:52,640 --> 00:41:00,079 capabilities in emergency management as well. Uh the awarded funds will be used 547 00:40:57,520 --> 00:41:04,480 to supplement the salary um of my position and the city has budgeted a 50% 548 00:41:02,880 --> 00:41:10,640 match of that total grant award to come out of the fiscal year 26 and fiscal 549 00:41:06,880 --> 00:41:15,440 year 27 budgets. Um because this signed agreement is uh due to be returned to 550 00:41:13,359 --> 00:41:19,920 the state by September 15th. I am also requesting that council approve a double 551 00:41:17,760 --> 00:41:24,000 read of the ordinance this evening so that we can meet that required deadline. 552 00:41:22,480 --> 00:41:26,319 » Happy to answer any questions. Any questions? 553 00:41:25,359 --> 00:41:30,400 » Go ahead. >> So, if we don't do a double read, it 554 00:41:28,560 --> 00:41:33,359 would cost the city money, correct? Because I'm guessing you wouldn't work 555 00:41:31,760 --> 00:41:36,720 for half pay. [snorts] >> I'd rather not. Yes. 556 00:41:34,560 --> 00:41:40,079 » Okay. [laughter] >> So, this is to save taxpayers money. All 557 00:41:39,200 --> 00:41:41,920 joking aside. >> Yes. 558 00:41:40,480 --> 00:41:44,640 » All right. Thank you. >> Go ahead. 559 00:41:42,560 --> 00:41:48,960 » This is more of a general question. Um, do we have any other positions that are 560 00:41:46,160 --> 00:41:53,440 either partially or fully grant funded? >> I'm thinking police co-responder, the 561 00:41:50,800 --> 00:41:58,960 mental health co-responders one. Is that the only other one? 562 00:41:56,000 --> 00:42:02,640 » Uh, I believe the victim advocate too. >> Gotcha. Okay. 563 00:41:59,839 --> 00:42:06,160 » And it and this may not be apples to apples, but correct me if I'm wrong 564 00:42:04,560 --> 00:42:10,960 here, but I believe we also get grants for various specialized positions within 565 00:42:08,480 --> 00:42:13,920 the police. Um, that may not cover their half or full salary, but covers 566 00:42:12,560 --> 00:42:17,319 certainly a portion of the overtime, that kind of thing. 567 00:42:17,760 --> 00:42:25,599 Off the top of my head, I can't think of any positions. We do get grants for 568 00:42:22,400 --> 00:42:28,800 specialized duties through like um traffic safety, hazardous moving, that 569 00:42:28,160 --> 00:42:31,680 kind of stuff. >> Yeah, maybe I guess maybe that's what I 570 00:42:30,480 --> 00:42:35,200 was talking about. Yeah, >> go ahead. 571 00:42:32,560 --> 00:42:41,400 » Do you uh know off the top of your head how many years we've applied for this 572 00:42:37,760 --> 00:42:41,400 grant and received it? 573 00:42:41,760 --> 00:42:53,079 » I think it goes prior to me being police chief in 2021. It may go back at least 574 00:42:48,800 --> 00:42:53,079 10 years. I know it's at least 15. 575 00:42:53,599 --> 00:42:58,560 » That's what I was thinking. >> It's at least 15. 576 00:42:56,880 --> 00:43:01,200 » She's positive it's been as long as she's been here. 577 00:42:59,520 --> 00:43:05,680 » Yes. >> Um I'm assuming you wrote and submitted 578 00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:07,760 your own grant application for this. >> Yes. 579 00:43:06,160 --> 00:43:11,599 » Way to sing for your supper. That is like a that [laughter] is a talent in 580 00:43:10,000 --> 00:43:14,000 our emergency management director. We maybe didn't select in the hiring 581 00:43:12,960 --> 00:43:17,920 process, but good job. >> Thank you. [snorts] 582 00:43:15,280 --> 00:43:20,880 » Anybody else? >> Hearing none. All in favor? 583 00:43:19,440 --> 00:43:25,440 » I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes. 584 00:43:23,599 --> 00:43:27,760 » Motion for second reading. >> Second. 585 00:43:26,000 --> 00:43:32,240 » We have a motion and a second for a second reading. 586 00:43:30,480 --> 00:43:36,000 » Any discussion on the motion and a second for a second reading. Go ahead. 587 00:43:34,160 --> 00:43:41,920 » I very much appreciated Council Member Bryan's uh point here, which is that uh 588 00:43:38,560 --> 00:43:45,440 not doing so would cost the taxpayers money. 589 00:43:43,520 --> 00:43:48,960 Well, just and just to be clear that we had this on the agenda last meeting, but 590 00:43:47,119 --> 00:43:52,400 we had some issues with some language that we got wanted to get cleared up. 591 00:43:50,560 --> 00:43:55,440 So, that's why we delayed it. So, that's why we're behind the eightball on this. 592 00:43:54,000 --> 00:43:59,440 So, >> anybody else on the motion to for a 593 00:43:57,280 --> 00:44:01,599 second reading? Hearing none. All in favor? 594 00:44:00,079 --> 00:44:07,119 » I. >> Any opposed? Motion passes. 595 00:44:05,680 --> 00:44:11,520 Motion approving the second reading of bill 2026-49. 596 00:44:09,599 --> 00:44:14,800 » An ordinance authorizing acceptance of funds and execution of a grant agreement 597 00:44:13,359 --> 00:44:18,480 with the Missouri Department of Public Safety from the Emergency Management 598 00:44:16,720 --> 00:44:22,359 Performance Grant for a total award amount of $89,510.30. 599 00:44:22,640 --> 00:44:25,839 » Present. >> Second. 600 00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:28,640 » We have a motion second. Any more discussion? 601 00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:30,400 » Hearing none. Roll call. >> Council member Richardson. 602 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:31,680 » I. >> Thompson. 603 00:44:31,280 --> 00:44:32,720 » Yes. >> Brian. 604 00:44:32,319 --> 00:44:33,839 » I. >> Davidson. 605 00:44:33,440 --> 00:44:35,440 » Yes. >> Johnson. 606 00:44:34,480 --> 00:44:36,480 » I. White >> I 607 00:44:35,839 --> 00:44:37,520 » Lawson >> I 608 00:44:36,800 --> 00:44:38,800 » McCllum >> I 609 00:44:37,839 --> 00:44:43,760 » Mayor Larkkey >> I motion passes 610 00:44:42,255 --> 00:44:48,160 [clears throat] >> two motion approving first reading bill 611 00:44:45,680 --> 00:44:52,079 2026-51 >> an ordinance amending chapter 15 article 612 00:44:50,480 --> 00:44:56,160 2 of the code of ordinances of the city of Belton Missouri to establish certain 613 00:44:54,240 --> 00:44:58,319 requirements related to the habitability of property in the city 614 00:44:57,599 --> 00:45:03,920 » present >> second a motion a second you're up sir 615 00:45:01,359 --> 00:45:09,280 » Mr. Mayor and Council, before you on in this uh ordinance essentially is a 616 00:45:06,880 --> 00:45:14,480 response to lots of questions in the public. Uh many coming from council 617 00:45:11,359 --> 00:45:18,960 members themselves about uh individuals uh being allowed to inhabit or sleep in 618 00:45:17,119 --> 00:45:25,760 areas of the city on private property that lack basic amenities that would 619 00:45:21,520 --> 00:45:30,640 normally make a property habitable. Um, again, we had the work session on this 620 00:45:27,440 --> 00:45:35,040 and we we specifically did not want to make put any added burden on anybody who 621 00:45:33,040 --> 00:45:39,040 might be homeless or houseless. And so that that's not how this was written. 622 00:45:36,560 --> 00:45:44,640 This was written essentially to uh try to ensure that property owners carry the 623 00:45:42,400 --> 00:45:51,440 burden to provide the basic habitable necessities that are established by our 624 00:45:47,119 --> 00:45:55,440 code in in other areas. Um, and uh, it's not designed to be overly orous, but you 625 00:45:53,920 --> 00:45:59,839 know, basic things like clean running water, adequate sanitary and sewer 626 00:45:57,520 --> 00:46:04,000 facilities, electric power, compliant with code, light air, and ventilation, 627 00:46:02,640 --> 00:46:08,720 uh, protection from the elements, and adequate access to heating are 628 00:46:05,760 --> 00:46:15,040 essentially what we're asking um, property owners to to provide to anybody 629 00:46:12,240 --> 00:46:19,520 who might be habiting their location. And so, I would be glad to stand for any 630 00:46:16,800 --> 00:46:21,871 questions. Go ahead. [clears throat] 631 00:46:22,000 --> 00:46:24,240 » I saw him burn. >> That's fine. 632 00:46:23,760 --> 00:46:30,160 » Go ahead. >> It says the uh the readily available the 633 00:46:27,520 --> 00:46:32,160 services like water, bathroom, stuff like that. 634 00:46:30,800 --> 00:46:37,280 » Yeah. >> I would like it to say that it has to be 635 00:46:34,079 --> 00:46:42,560 available 24 hours of the day all the time versus readily available could mean 636 00:46:40,960 --> 00:46:45,680 10 minutes a day. >> I that's not how I would define. I guess 637 00:46:44,160 --> 00:46:48,880 that's a question for the city attorney. My understanding is readily available 638 00:46:47,520 --> 00:46:52,640 would mean available at any point in time. 639 00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:54,800 » Yeah. Ready and available access means that they always have to have access to 640 00:46:54,400 --> 00:46:57,520 it. >> Okay. 641 00:46:55,200 --> 00:47:01,280 » It's not again that that would be like if we allowed a landlord to rent a house 642 00:46:59,520 --> 00:47:04,079 to somebody and then they put a timer on the bathroom door that said you couldn't 643 00:47:02,800 --> 00:47:05,280 use it from >> Okay. 644 00:47:04,480 --> 00:47:07,200 » you know 12 hours. >> Well, as long as that's what we're going 645 00:47:06,400 --> 00:47:09,520 to go by. >> Yeah. 646 00:47:08,400 --> 00:47:15,200 » Go ahead. >> Well, Council Member Richardson kind of 647 00:47:12,480 --> 00:47:20,960 stole a little bit of my question. So, uh, if a landlord 648 00:47:19,119 --> 00:47:24,480 left the house unlocked for someone to come in and out, then that would be 649 00:47:22,800 --> 00:47:30,000 readily available and they could still sleep outside. 650 00:47:26,319 --> 00:47:34,240 Is that my understanding of this? >> That's a good question. 651 00:47:32,000 --> 00:47:37,760 » You I thought he said sheltered from the elements. 652 00:47:36,480 --> 00:47:41,200 Well, it depends upon >> having it available and and the purpose 653 00:47:39,359 --> 00:47:44,560 the person utilizing it might be two different things. But 654 00:47:43,119 --> 00:47:47,920 » again, sufficient protection from the elements is also key. And again, we 655 00:47:46,400 --> 00:47:50,800 didn't one of the reasons why the ordinance was kind of switched to this 656 00:47:49,119 --> 00:47:53,599 is we didn't want to go over broad and end up capturing people, you know, 657 00:47:52,400 --> 00:47:57,520 camping with their kids in their backyard. [snorts] So, instead it was 658 00:47:55,119 --> 00:48:02,720 focused on the habitability of the structure. I would also note that um it 659 00:48:00,319 --> 00:48:07,920 is not common, and Casey can correct me if I'm wrong, for landlords to leave 660 00:48:05,760 --> 00:48:11,760 open their property to the elements and to keep on water service that they will 661 00:48:10,319 --> 00:48:16,079 have to pay for for other people to utilize or electrical as well. 662 00:48:14,079 --> 00:48:21,440 » Well, I was thinking of people that are sleeping in someone's backyard, not 663 00:48:18,160 --> 00:48:24,480 necessarily landlords. >> Go ahead. 664 00:48:22,800 --> 00:48:30,640 » You stole my question. >> Sorry. I I want to get a little deeper 665 00:48:27,599 --> 00:48:36,400 into that. Um let's just go with the scenario that was presented in front of 666 00:48:32,640 --> 00:48:45,520 us. We had somebody sleeping on a piece of property, you know, on Main Street um 667 00:48:40,400 --> 00:48:51,920 under a overhang uh of sorts. would that person have been? And if they 668 00:48:48,240 --> 00:48:57,839 were allowed to go in for water and restroom and you know and if the tornado 669 00:48:56,240 --> 00:49:02,160 came through, take shelter, that kind of thing, would they meet this definition? 670 00:49:00,079 --> 00:49:05,760 I would also note that sufficient protection from the elements being 671 00:49:03,599 --> 00:49:10,079 readily available would mean that the in that case the church would have had to 672 00:49:07,440 --> 00:49:14,240 keep their door unlocked 24/7 because readily a ready and available means that 673 00:49:12,160 --> 00:49:18,480 you can access them without anybody else needing to come in and provide consent. 674 00:49:16,640 --> 00:49:24,400 » Well, let's just say they did that. Let's say they their door was unlocked. 675 00:49:20,880 --> 00:49:28,400 The person was on the the front porch. Is that is that allowable under this 676 00:49:27,200 --> 00:49:31,839 code? I >> I think you can argue that it's not 677 00:49:29,920 --> 00:49:35,280 because of the extreme temperature changes. 678 00:49:33,200 --> 00:49:39,359 » Well, I appreciate that, but I guess I'd like to know officially. 679 00:49:36,559 --> 00:49:43,119 » I don't know how we would in in >> one of the things was we went down the 680 00:49:40,800 --> 00:49:48,720 same rabbit hole when it came to trying to go with the camping sort of 681 00:49:45,520 --> 00:49:52,960 situation. So, there's only two routes we can go down. And so if we didn't 682 00:49:51,359 --> 00:49:57,119 think that camping was probably gonna get it done or be done in a manner that 683 00:49:55,520 --> 00:50:01,119 we could kind of fit it in, which I don't think most of staff thought we 684 00:49:58,480 --> 00:50:05,599 could, this is kind of the this is the route. And I I know that hypotheticals 685 00:50:03,359 --> 00:50:08,160 like again that one I do not believe that any of 686 00:50:06,800 --> 00:50:13,040 » I know I know that's why I actually didn't say hypothetical when I started 687 00:50:10,000 --> 00:50:14,800 this because the a lawyer's worst, you know, words. 688 00:50:13,520 --> 00:50:17,599 » I mean, I'll just say under the facts that were presented to the city based on 689 00:50:16,480 --> 00:50:22,960 what was occurring, they were in violation of this. Now, if they changed 690 00:50:19,680 --> 00:50:29,440 that to do a bunch of other stuff, aka allowed them the ability to go inside at 691 00:50:25,359 --> 00:50:34,400 all times and gave them a key, maybe they could be outside of the scope 692 00:50:32,000 --> 00:50:39,760 of this, but that didn't happen. And so, we don't know what the extent of that 693 00:50:36,640 --> 00:50:44,000 would be. Okay. And to to play devil's advocate, what would if how would we go 694 00:50:41,599 --> 00:50:49,280 further than this and and stop someone like yourself from wanting to sleep on 695 00:50:46,160 --> 00:50:53,200 your porch at any point in time for any reason you when you have readily 696 00:50:51,760 --> 00:50:55,520 access to everything else? I mean, again, are we going to at some point we 697 00:50:54,559 --> 00:50:59,680 don't want to infringe on people's individual liberties. We we just want to 698 00:50:57,359 --> 00:51:03,440 make sure that they have the the protections that they deserve. 699 00:51:00,960 --> 00:51:08,640 » Yep. Solid point. I just uh I wanted to make sure I understood uh more 700 00:51:06,160 --> 00:51:14,480 specifically there. Thank you. >> Go ahead. 701 00:51:11,119 --> 00:51:19,119 » What is our policy if one's if someone gets their water shut off and how many 702 00:51:17,359 --> 00:51:22,720 days do they have to get it turned back on before 703 00:51:20,960 --> 00:51:26,079 it's considered? >> Um so honestly water shut off to a 704 00:51:24,880 --> 00:51:30,640 building is already considered a dangerous structure that we can order 705 00:51:27,599 --> 00:51:33,920 them to vacate. Um so our again typically if somebody gets their water 706 00:51:32,160 --> 00:51:39,920 shut off and we know they're attempting to reside in a structure that does not 707 00:51:37,359 --> 00:51:46,079 have adequate access to facil does not have adequate facilities which is 708 00:51:41,440 --> 00:51:50,400 defined in our uh udc we have a couple times not every time again because there 709 00:51:48,000 --> 00:51:54,000 are extenduating circumstances somebody could be like I'm coming down tomorrow 710 00:51:51,760 --> 00:51:59,200 to pay it don't write me the notice of dangerous building and kick me out but 711 00:51:55,520 --> 00:52:01,599 we have uh ordered vacated structure in town when somebody did not have running 712 00:52:01,040 --> 00:52:04,960 water. >> So technically you get your water shut 713 00:52:03,359 --> 00:52:08,319 off one day, they could be at your door the next day evicting them. 714 00:52:06,880 --> 00:52:10,240 » Well, that would be well that's under the IRC. 715 00:52:09,040 --> 00:52:13,920 » Not evicting them, but yeah, >> that's under the international 716 00:52:11,359 --> 00:52:19,760 residential code requires if there is not adequate facilities which it defines 717 00:52:16,160 --> 00:52:24,160 as water sewer then a structure is determined to be dangerous and that is a 718 00:52:22,720 --> 00:52:28,400 again that was not written by anybody here that is the international code 719 00:52:25,680 --> 00:52:31,640 council. Okay, >> go ahead. 720 00:52:32,400 --> 00:52:35,760 » Let me come back because I just forgot it actually. 721 00:52:35,119 --> 00:52:39,680 » Go ahead. >> Uh, can you walk us through what 722 00:52:38,000 --> 00:52:44,000 enforcement of this would look like, say, in the situation we had on Main 723 00:52:42,319 --> 00:52:47,520 Street this summer? If this had been in effect, what would the process have 724 00:52:45,520 --> 00:52:53,280 been? >> That's a good question. Um, 725 00:52:50,319 --> 00:52:58,400 it's a code violation. So, a a a courtesy notice to start and then a 726 00:52:55,359 --> 00:53:03,240 citation for the uh property owner. That's generally how we've handled code 727 00:52:59,520 --> 00:53:03,240 violations in the past. 728 00:53:05,280 --> 00:53:14,079 » I I will add to that that while this was going on this summer, I did reach out to 729 00:53:11,599 --> 00:53:18,160 someone higher up in the church organization downtown and they said, "We 730 00:53:16,559 --> 00:53:25,160 know you don't have an ordinance, so we know you can't do nothing to us." and 731 00:53:20,559 --> 00:53:25,160 they told me that on the phone. So, 732 00:53:25,359 --> 00:53:30,319 so just to to kind of answer what your question is, this this will give us 733 00:53:29,680 --> 00:53:34,000 something. >> We could technically I mean normal code 734 00:53:32,400 --> 00:53:37,280 violation notice is how that's handled, but we could we could always technically 735 00:53:35,599 --> 00:53:40,480 say it's not habitable and you're not allowed to stay there. 736 00:53:39,440 --> 00:53:44,240 » I guess >> essentially post it like we do would 737 00:53:42,319 --> 00:53:49,440 another property. I I just want to be able to visualize 738 00:53:46,480 --> 00:53:53,440 what like the final logical conclusion of this would be. If we write a courtesy 739 00:53:51,599 --> 00:53:59,520 notice, then we write a code violation, then at some point we abate it. It's a a 740 00:53:56,079 --> 00:54:04,480 human. You know what I mean? >> Well, I would also note that this 741 00:54:01,520 --> 00:54:10,079 ordinance is directed at the property owner and less at the actual person 742 00:54:07,920 --> 00:54:14,640 occupying the premises. So, it would be a fine. And then honestly, if somebody 743 00:54:12,160 --> 00:54:19,200 continued to violate this, my suggestion would be to actually go to the circuit 744 00:54:16,079 --> 00:54:24,000 court and get an injunction because again, you are correct. It 745 00:54:21,920 --> 00:54:27,040 abatement is >> kind of a weird term for 746 00:54:25,920 --> 00:54:30,000 » a question mark. >> Yeah, that's 747 00:54:28,000 --> 00:54:34,880 » and and so if the situation were to arise in that setting, I would suggest 748 00:54:32,160 --> 00:54:38,079 instead of abating it in that manner, because I don't know how you do it, 749 00:54:36,559 --> 00:54:42,000 would would we just pick up all of his stuff and set it on the sidewalk? 750 00:54:40,400 --> 00:54:46,720 something like that. Instead, it would be I would suggest that we go to Cass 751 00:54:44,240 --> 00:54:50,640 County and get an injunction uh against the property owner making it 752 00:54:49,119 --> 00:54:55,342 so that they would be defying a court order and could be held in contempt of 753 00:54:52,480 --> 00:54:57,920 court by Cass County if they [clears throat] did not comply with the 754 00:54:57,200 --> 00:54:59,760 injunction. >> Okay. Thank you. 755 00:54:58,720 --> 00:55:05,119 » Go ahead. >> So, if someone doesn't have gets their 756 00:55:02,880 --> 00:55:08,720 water shut off, we could go the next day >> Yeah. 757 00:55:05,839 --> 00:55:14,079 » and and remove them from the premises. Correct. Uh we can we can put we've 758 00:55:12,559 --> 00:55:18,079 boarded properties up >> the next day. We could 759 00:55:15,680 --> 00:55:21,200 » Yeah. And they and they could sleep outside and then if they were sleeping 760 00:55:19,920 --> 00:55:23,839 outside, we would write them another ticket and then we'd also end up in the 761 00:55:22,720 --> 00:55:26,079 same situation if they were sleeping outside. 762 00:55:24,160 --> 00:55:29,599 » But in this situation, same thing. No water. They could be there for months. 763 00:55:28,079 --> 00:55:32,480 » Well, yeah, but the issue is the difference in what abatement looks like. 764 00:55:30,960 --> 00:55:35,839 Abatement to stop somebody from going into a home is putting up boards on a 765 00:55:34,160 --> 00:55:38,960 wall. Again, they could then sleep outside. And then if they were sleeping 766 00:55:37,359 --> 00:55:43,920 outside, we would be in the same situation where what does abatement look 767 00:55:40,800 --> 00:55:47,760 like? Does it look like, you know, driving out there and throwing away a 768 00:55:46,160 --> 00:55:52,240 bunch of tents and moving people's property? I would in that case as well 769 00:55:50,079 --> 00:55:55,520 suggest that our route would be an injunction to the circuit court, which 770 00:55:53,680 --> 00:55:58,960 we did in a case in Loanjack that was somewhat similar to the hypothetical I 771 00:55:57,920 --> 00:56:05,839 just gave. >> Okay, go ahead. Uh 772 00:56:02,799 --> 00:56:10,000 under A, it says it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or 773 00:56:07,760 --> 00:56:15,200 entity owning or controlling property in the city to permit. 774 00:56:12,319 --> 00:56:20,400 Uh there's been several situations where 775 00:56:18,559 --> 00:56:27,280 I've driven and see people sleeping on the sidewalk, 776 00:56:24,640 --> 00:56:31,839 for example, underneath the interstate uh 49 777 00:56:29,119 --> 00:56:33,440 at 4:00 in the morning, 5:00 in the morning. 778 00:56:32,160 --> 00:56:37,920 » The government is not a person or entity. 779 00:56:34,319 --> 00:56:44,040 » So they can do that without without having an issue. 780 00:56:40,000 --> 00:56:44,040 Okay. Anybody 781 00:56:44,319 --> 00:56:47,319 else? 782 00:56:47,760 --> 00:56:53,359 » Hearing none. All in favor? >> I I 783 00:56:51,280 --> 00:56:58,720 » Any opposed? Motion passes. 784 00:56:56,720 --> 00:57:01,280 One consent or I consent agenda one motion not available to approve the 785 00:56:59,920 --> 00:57:04,079 recommendation noted. Any member of this council may ask for the item be taken 786 00:57:02,640 --> 00:57:06,960 from the consent agenda for discussion and separate action. 787 00:57:06,160 --> 00:57:10,720 » Present. >> Second. 788 00:57:07,599 --> 00:57:12,559 » Motion in a second. Any discussion? Hearing none. All in favor? 789 00:57:12,160 --> 00:57:17,280 » I >> I. 790 00:57:13,839 --> 00:57:21,520 » Any opposed? Motion passes. Ports, boards, commissions, park board, public 791 00:57:19,280 --> 00:57:26,079 arts commission. K. Communication with city council. 792 00:57:23,440 --> 00:57:29,760 Council member White. >> I don't have anything today. 793 00:57:28,160 --> 00:57:33,839 » Council member Thompson. >> I don't have anything today. 794 00:57:31,680 --> 00:57:37,440 » Council member Davidson. >> Um, [clears throat] I just want to 795 00:57:34,799 --> 00:57:43,359 remind everybody that this Saturday is the fall crawl. There will be 40 plus 796 00:57:40,559 --> 00:57:47,839 vendors set up inside and outside of different businesses. 797 00:57:45,359 --> 00:57:54,319 Um there'll be yoga at 8 o'clock at Pal Park, music, magic show. Um just a lot 798 00:57:51,680 --> 00:57:57,040 of fun. Thanks, >> Council Member Prime. 799 00:57:55,359 --> 00:58:03,280 » I have nothing. >> Member Lawson. Um, I would just remind 800 00:58:00,319 --> 00:58:08,079 folks to stop at school buses with the stop arm out and note that the school 801 00:58:05,599 --> 00:58:11,359 district has cameras on those uh to catch folks if they don't. And as a 802 00:58:09,920 --> 00:58:14,480 parent whose child rides a school bus and there's a little kid across the 803 00:58:12,720 --> 00:58:19,200 street who has to cross Mill to get on her bus, I'm glad for that. 804 00:58:17,599 --> 00:58:24,480 » Council member Richardson. >> Um, I just want to suggest the downtown 805 00:58:22,720 --> 00:58:29,839 Belt Main Street is hosting the fall craw fall crawl this Saturday, September 806 00:58:26,720 --> 00:58:32,960 12th. as council member Davidson said, um, support our downtown businesses, 807 00:58:31,520 --> 00:58:38,160 enjoy everything on Main Street has to offer. Um, the Belt and Chamber has on 808 00:58:35,280 --> 00:58:43,940 September 23rd the Kansas City Symphony will be per performing free music in 809 00:58:40,400 --> 00:58:47,680 Wallace Park from 5:30 to 7:30. [clears throat and cough] And then on 810 00:58:44,880 --> 00:58:51,119 September 24th, the Belton Chamber is they still have openings for the 811 00:58:48,960 --> 00:58:55,440 glow-in-the-dark golf tournament um at Eagles Landing. This will be the final 812 00:58:53,599 --> 00:59:00,640 year for the tournament, so don't miss your chance to be a part of it. Thanks, 813 00:58:58,480 --> 00:59:05,520 » Council Member McCllum. >> Um, 814 00:59:02,559 --> 00:59:08,799 there's what, two weeks left now to uh put your or maybe not even a full two 815 00:59:07,200 --> 00:59:12,319 weeks, but anyways, there we're there's still time if you want to apply for the 816 00:59:10,319 --> 00:59:16,720 Charter Review Board. Uh, want to remind people to continue to apply for that. 817 00:59:14,720 --> 00:59:21,280 Um, I I got to give a shout out to our 818 00:59:18,400 --> 00:59:27,040 police department who uh actually last night the railroad uh the Belton 819 00:59:25,119 --> 00:59:33,200 Historical Railroad received some vandalism and was caught literally 820 00:59:31,280 --> 00:59:37,359 moments after it happened. All because they were doing a um driveby and 821 00:59:36,079 --> 00:59:42,400 happened to notice something that looked suspicious and um did a phenomenal job 822 00:59:40,559 --> 00:59:46,480 of following up on that. And I just really want to give this shout out there 823 00:59:43,680 --> 00:59:53,440 because it it it's a it's an unfortunate thing to um have to deal with and I'm 824 00:59:50,079 --> 00:59:59,760 I'm hopeful that we're getting to the more positive side of of dealing with 825 00:59:55,760 --> 01:00:04,000 those kinds of things. Um I also got to bring up schools uh because especially 826 01:00:01,920 --> 01:00:07,119 specifically in Ward One uh there's been a lot there's I mean there's always 827 01:00:05,280 --> 01:00:11,440 chatter around drop off and pickup. I know. Um but Ward One, there's been a 828 01:00:10,079 --> 01:00:16,079 lot of conversation around Kentucky Trail and um and so I had some 829 01:00:14,319 --> 01:00:20,559 conversation with the city manager and I know that we've um talked about the 830 01:00:18,640 --> 01:00:24,000 police presence there is also traffic light timing. I saw public works out 831 01:00:22,079 --> 01:00:26,160 there working on that. Um so we're already seeing some improvements, but I 832 01:00:25,359 --> 01:00:29,760 just want to say thank you to the residents for bringing that up. Um and 833 01:00:28,079 --> 01:00:36,400 the city's going to try to help out the schools, you know, in any way we can um 834 01:00:32,319 --> 01:00:42,880 on that front. Um, switching to parks updates. I uh there 835 01:00:41,119 --> 01:00:47,680 was not a meeting in between that this our last meeting. So, nothing uh new to 836 01:00:45,280 --> 01:00:51,839 add from an upcoming perspective. I'll just note they still need lifeguards. 837 01:00:49,760 --> 01:00:58,000 The farmers market is still going on Thursdays uh 4 to 7. Registration has 838 01:00:54,960 --> 01:01:01,520 opened for youth basketball. Um, oh, and HighBlue is running a special right now 839 01:01:00,079 --> 01:01:08,000 where if you join in the month of September, there will be a um there will 840 01:01:04,559 --> 01:01:11,760 be no enrollment fee at all. So, um, so just uh something to consider. And then 841 01:01:09,920 --> 01:01:16,319 they have a bunch of events going on coming up. I've already mentioned all 842 01:01:13,599 --> 01:01:21,119 them, so I'm not going to repeat myself. And that's everything I have. 843 01:01:19,520 --> 01:01:23,680 » Council member Johnson, >> I hope everybody had a good Labor Day 844 01:01:22,720 --> 01:01:28,079 weekend even though it was extraordinarily hot. Um looking forward 845 01:01:25,920 --> 01:01:31,599 to some cooler weather tomorrow. Um also would echo council member McCllum. Uh if 846 01:01:30,480 --> 01:01:35,920 you're interested in being on the charter review commission, please send 847 01:01:33,359 --> 01:01:39,520 in your application. Um also echo the fall crawl is this weekend on Main 848 01:01:38,160 --> 01:01:43,200 Street and encourage everyone to participate in that. And the Belt and 849 01:01:41,280 --> 01:01:48,400 Railroad Days is the following Saturday on the 19th from 10 to 4 um with lots of 850 01:01:47,040 --> 01:01:51,760 activities for families and I think there's some corresponding events on 851 01:01:49,839 --> 01:01:55,440 Main Street as well and would ask everybody to participate in those. I 852 01:01:53,119 --> 01:02:00,160 think it'll be a lot of fun. Um, and that's all I've got. 853 01:01:58,000 --> 01:02:03,599 » All right. Uh, only thing I got is a save the date. Uh, set the date for 854 01:02:02,240 --> 01:02:07,880 Mayor's Christmas tree lighting, which will be November the 28th. 855 01:02:08,160 --> 01:02:13,680 Uh, city manager. >> Mr. Mayor, I only have one thing, and 856 01:02:11,680 --> 01:02:18,079 that is that after the recent storms this weekend, um, and the the heavy 857 01:02:16,799 --> 01:02:22,720 winds that we had on one of those evenings, um, we are going to be opening 858 01:02:20,000 --> 01:02:26,319 the limb drop off for any residents who might want to utilize it. Um, I believe 859 01:02:24,400 --> 01:02:30,640 they'll be open tomorrow and Thursday. Um, look, you can look for some 860 01:02:27,599 --> 01:02:35,200 correspondence on on our uh marketing uh Facebook pages specifically on on uh the 861 01:02:33,280 --> 01:02:42,119 time for those. But >> is that used often? I mean, do we have a 862 01:02:37,520 --> 01:02:42,119 really good turnout when those are open? 863 01:02:42,720 --> 01:02:48,880 » We did after the tornado have a lot of people come by and then after one storm 864 01:02:47,040 --> 01:02:52,160 that we had, we did have a few residents come by. Uh there's other times that 865 01:02:50,720 --> 01:02:55,463 nobody's come. So, >> but I mean, but it's it's nice to have 866 01:02:53,839 --> 01:02:59,119 it. I think I' I've dropped off brush [snorts] more than one time there. 867 01:02:56,720 --> 01:03:02,880 » Yeah. There you go. >> Sorry. I just want to add to that. I 868 01:03:00,720 --> 01:03:06,319 appreciate that a lot. I've gotten I I I'm assuming after the other storm 869 01:03:04,240 --> 01:03:10,240 you're mentioning, I've gotten a lot of, uh, you know, residents talking to me 870 01:03:08,079 --> 01:03:14,079 about thanking me for, you know, um, having that open, that kind of thing. 871 01:03:11,599 --> 01:03:17,119 So, it's even on the ones where maybe no one shows up because they took care of 872 01:03:15,520 --> 01:03:19,599 it themselves or whatever, I know it's appreciated. 873 01:03:18,079 --> 01:03:24,319 » I would echo that. I had a neighbor who took five loads of down limbs and was 874 01:03:22,319 --> 01:03:28,559 very happy to have that limb drop off. I was much appreciated. 875 01:03:25,920 --> 01:03:33,680 » Hey, I I appreciate that, too. Um, and I know tomorrow and Thursday and I know a 876 01:03:32,400 --> 01:03:37,520 lot of people have a hard time doing it during the week. Is there any way to do 877 01:03:35,520 --> 01:03:42,160 like couple two or three hours on a Saturday or something or not? I just 878 01:03:39,760 --> 01:03:46,554 thought I'd throw it out there, but >> we'll see what we can do. 879 01:03:43,440 --> 01:03:48,640 » Yeah. Thank you. [snorts] 880 01:03:46,720 --> 01:03:52,400 » Anybody else? All right. Items for review and 881 01:03:50,240 --> 01:03:55,920 discussion. Number one, Y belt and plaza tiff. 882 01:03:54,400 --> 01:04:00,240 » All right, Mr. Mayor, I'm not going to talk too much about this other than just 883 01:03:57,440 --> 01:04:05,280 to say that the Y belt and tiff um has some restrictions on users and I know 884 01:04:02,559 --> 01:04:08,799 that the developer of that area has a potential user that right now would 885 01:04:07,039 --> 01:04:12,720 potentially be restricted. So, I think he'd like for you all to consider an 886 01:04:11,119 --> 01:04:16,240 amendment to the TIFF. So, I'm not going to talk too much about it, but I'm going 887 01:04:13,839 --> 01:04:19,920 to invite David Christie up to discuss um what he's looking for and what uh the 888 01:04:18,559 --> 01:04:23,280 the limit is that there are no automotive uses essentially, I believe 889 01:04:21,599 --> 01:04:28,880 is what the limit says for the TIFF. And I think he's got one specific user that 890 01:04:25,760 --> 01:04:31,880 in a spot that uh hasn't developed yet. So, 891 01:04:45,504 --> 01:04:47,524 [snorts] 892 01:04:53,364 --> 01:04:55,384 [snorts] 893 01:04:56,960 --> 01:05:03,839 » Distinguished Council members, Mr. Mayor, appreciate the opportunity to 894 01:05:01,440 --> 01:05:08,319 visit David Christie. Um, 895 01:05:06,480 --> 01:05:11,839 excited to be in front of you. I wanted to 896 01:05:09,920 --> 01:05:16,559 um I'd like to take a minute if you don't 897 01:05:13,599 --> 01:05:23,359 mind to open up uh both my life and my 898 01:05:20,160 --> 01:05:29,599 development uh credentials and what what I've done uh with the city's help truly 899 01:05:27,280 --> 01:05:36,880 um in Belt and in other communities in Cass County. Um, it's been an incredible 900 01:05:33,200 --> 01:05:42,880 partnership going back to u over 20 years with when I uh brought Home Depot 901 01:05:39,760 --> 01:05:47,200 to the market and uh I've worked with five probably five different 902 01:05:45,200 --> 01:05:52,799 administrations and u it's just been a it's just been a 903 01:05:49,599 --> 01:05:59,200 wonderful ride for me. So, I'm excited about um the Gateway project, but I 904 01:05:56,400 --> 01:06:07,680 wanted to take a couple minutes to uh invite questions about 905 01:06:03,280 --> 01:06:12,960 about what I've done. Um if I haven't done something, why ha 906 01:06:09,599 --> 01:06:16,559 haven't I not done it? Uh you know, and those types of things. And if you know, 907 01:06:14,319 --> 01:06:21,760 if you guys would if the mayor would allow that to have a little question and 908 01:06:18,559 --> 01:06:27,599 answers period. Um, it's a little bit sad for me because every single council 909 01:06:24,640 --> 01:06:32,640 member, nearly every single one has had my personal phone numbers 910 01:06:29,599 --> 01:06:38,720 » for 25 years and they've called me and I've called them and I've met them for 911 01:06:34,640 --> 01:06:46,079 coffee and I just don't feel like I have um a relationship with you all and uh 912 01:06:43,520 --> 01:06:51,599 the way that the council the council members and this city and and you 913 01:06:49,680 --> 01:06:55,599 basically um I used to call you alderman. 914 01:06:53,839 --> 01:07:01,200 Everything everything has changed so you know over so many years. But um is they 915 01:06:58,720 --> 01:07:05,920 shared ideas with me like when I when I talked to the mayor 916 01:07:02,960 --> 01:07:09,119 and Joe about what they wanted on the property that I bought from you all. 917 01:07:07,680 --> 01:07:15,039 They said Olive Garden and I went and got Olive Garden and I moved Olive 918 01:07:11,680 --> 01:07:18,640 Garden from the Gateway project because that's where I had a letter of intent 919 01:07:16,720 --> 01:07:23,680 signed but with Olive Garden with Darden. and I showed them this property 920 01:07:21,680 --> 01:07:28,640 where they're currently open and they said, "We like that better." And I said, 921 01:07:25,039 --> 01:07:35,839 "Great. So, let's go do it." But I can't please this council or anybody else if I 922 01:07:33,039 --> 01:07:39,119 don't know number one that what I'm doing right because I do a lot of things 923 01:07:37,599 --> 01:07:44,640 wrong. But if you all share these things with 924 01:07:41,280 --> 01:07:49,760 me, then it allows me to be a better tool for you in your city to do the 925 01:07:47,200 --> 01:07:55,599 projects that you need done. So, you all may know I bought 100 I 926 01:07:52,640 --> 01:08:00,000 bought 171st in homes. I'm trying to do a big grocery store powder center there 927 01:07:57,440 --> 01:08:07,119 next to Lock Lloyd. Um I Ive redeveloped the Y58 project uh 928 01:08:04,960 --> 01:08:13,039 that the Constantinos were not able to lease and we just signed another lease 929 01:08:09,599 --> 01:08:20,480 today. So, that's really going well. I built the the other place project in 930 01:08:16,080 --> 01:08:26,640 Valvaline. Um, I've provided uh a copy of a signed letter of intent from Swig 931 01:08:23,520 --> 01:08:31,040 that we signed in late June and I'm trying to make that project go forward. 932 01:08:29,279 --> 01:08:39,199 They came in and reviewed it and they're worried about the size of the land is 39 933 01:08:34,880 --> 01:08:45,839 acres. So, it's a pretty substantial substantially small piece of property. 934 01:08:42,239 --> 01:08:50,159 And so, um, they said, "We want to make sure that we can lay out and get traffic 935 01:08:48,000 --> 01:08:57,040 in and out of this project because everybody knows when the swig goes in 936 01:08:53,040 --> 01:09:03,520 there, the traffic is just monumental." >> So, anyway, so I provided that um for I 937 01:09:02,159 --> 01:09:08,480 think some of the council members have had questions about uh Swig and what was 938 01:09:06,480 --> 01:09:13,440 going to happen there. So there's there's a signing agreement that I 939 01:09:10,080 --> 01:09:18,960 signed in June, but I just I just really want to have a better relationship with 940 01:09:15,120 --> 01:09:24,799 you because I I try to do what um you guys asked me to do because you guys are 941 01:09:21,199 --> 01:09:32,400 speaking for the citizens of Belton and I've been here a long time and so um I'm 942 01:09:29,279 --> 01:09:40,239 trying to get Gateway developed. I've learned as re as as recently as 943 01:09:35,199 --> 01:09:45,520 today that uh the beeferoo deal is now the neers deal and I did the deal with 944 01:09:42,480 --> 01:09:50,000 neers after flying to Utah to meet with them and look at their concept and I 945 01:09:48,080 --> 01:09:55,280 loved it. I thought this is like Panera. This is going to be amazing. And the 946 01:09:52,159 --> 01:10:00,320 folks that were running it, the fourh four foods group, I think is the their 947 01:09:57,280 --> 01:10:04,960 name, you know, ended up having about 80 or 90 stores and then the owners of of 948 01:10:02,880 --> 01:10:08,719 of Neers 949 01:10:06,640 --> 01:10:14,400 refused to sell the concept and everything in in its entirety to them. 950 01:10:10,640 --> 01:10:19,199 So they bought the Neers Group out and then they closed all their stores 951 01:10:16,560 --> 01:10:24,640 including the one at 119th and Metcap in front of Target. Who can't 952 01:10:22,080 --> 01:10:31,280 make money there? So it was just terrible. So, as a city 953 01:10:28,080 --> 01:10:36,480 and as a developer and as a community, we've lived with a black eye with the 954 01:10:33,920 --> 01:10:42,320 neers project and it's really hurt my pad marketing. 955 01:10:38,640 --> 01:10:46,080 When we decided to do this project, I invited 956 01:10:43,920 --> 01:10:50,480 u the council members and they I think there was a an actually like a task 957 01:10:48,239 --> 01:10:56,080 force that said these are the tenants we'd like to see in our city. 958 01:10:54,080 --> 01:11:02,239 So, but they're essentially like attached, I think, Joe, to to the tiff 959 01:10:58,960 --> 01:11:09,600 agreement. This is what we want. So, the previous administration, uh, Mayor Davis 960 01:11:05,760 --> 01:11:15,040 asked me not to do fast food. And out of respect for him, because he 961 01:11:12,400 --> 01:11:20,640 he was he was a good leader just like Mayor Mary's a great guy and great 962 01:11:17,520 --> 01:11:27,120 leader, I didn't do it. So, we're trying to develop that. I spent 963 01:11:24,560 --> 01:11:32,000 I believe it's 11 to 12 million dollars building Turner Road and Marky Parkway 964 01:11:28,960 --> 01:11:39,760 of my own money that I would like to get back by having this project completed 965 01:11:35,760 --> 01:11:46,480 and I'm excited about it. So, um, but I've done everything I could. I I 966 01:11:43,440 --> 01:11:51,520 flew and met with Costco. I put the land under contract, which is now going to be 967 01:11:48,960 --> 01:11:57,520 the Petra project. I put the land under under uh contract to negotiate the the 968 01:11:54,880 --> 01:12:04,560 Costco deal. So, I've done everything that I can within my power to bring 969 01:12:00,960 --> 01:12:09,280 retailers that make Belton successful and a place that people want 970 01:12:06,640 --> 01:12:13,600 to live. And when I shared with the council many moons ago, a different 971 01:12:11,199 --> 01:12:19,679 obviously a different body, how are you going to get companies like like that 972 01:12:16,000 --> 01:12:23,840 went in uh North Point's project when they can't? There's no department 973 01:12:20,960 --> 01:12:28,239 stores. And so when I brought Kohl's and negotiated that project, I said, "You 974 01:12:26,480 --> 01:12:32,159 got to have a department store in your city so that the wives, if they're if 975 01:12:30,719 --> 01:12:35,760 their husbands are being transferred here or they're thinking about bringing 976 01:12:34,159 --> 01:12:40,159 the company here, they've got some services." And that's what this whole 977 01:12:38,000 --> 01:12:46,480 this whole thing has been about with me over the years. So, I'd like to invite 978 01:12:43,600 --> 01:12:51,760 anybody that has questions about me, uh my life, uh the project, these projects 979 01:12:49,440 --> 01:12:56,719 that I've done here. I'm happy to answer them for one minute or two and then I'll 980 01:12:54,400 --> 01:12:59,840 talk about the uh the project there at Gateway and we can finish uh our 981 01:12:58,960 --> 01:13:03,679 conversations. >> Go ahead. 982 01:13:00,800 --> 01:13:07,360 » Uh thank you for being here. Um, I have great respect for what you've done, but 983 01:13:06,000 --> 01:13:13,840 I'm going to tell you my personal opinion. I don't want anything there. 984 01:13:11,280 --> 01:13:18,960 I want it to be because of what's coming down around the corner, the big process. 985 01:13:16,719 --> 01:13:23,040 I'd like to have some vacant land, some little things for for parks, for 986 01:13:21,120 --> 01:13:28,480 something there that people can still see grass before they start going around 987 01:13:25,600 --> 01:13:33,280 the corner and seeing Petra. So, that's just my personal opinion. And if you 988 01:13:30,719 --> 01:13:38,239 could do something that would promote that, I would be thoroughly involved 989 01:13:35,679 --> 01:13:41,520 with that. But I do appreciate every effort that you've made. I just don't 990 01:13:39,840 --> 01:13:47,120 necessarily agree with every effort. But that doesn't mean it's not a good idea. 991 01:13:43,920 --> 01:13:51,400 I just have a personal opinion. >> Thank you. 992 01:13:48,000 --> 01:13:51,400 » Anybody else? 993 01:13:52,159 --> 01:13:57,360 » Oh, sorry. >> Yeah, I'll agree. Credit where credit's 994 01:13:55,760 --> 01:14:01,120 due. a lot of kind of the creature comforts and and things folks have come 995 01:13:59,040 --> 01:14:04,880 to enjoy in Belton have been your handy work. Olive Garden is a feather in all 996 01:14:03,120 --> 01:14:09,600 of our caps. Uh even though you did a lot of the heavy lifting, um I will say 997 01:14:07,520 --> 01:14:15,679 this concept, I don't know how privileged it is, but um I'm a fan. So 998 01:14:12,880 --> 01:14:17,360 there's that. >> Go ahead. 999 01:14:16,159 --> 01:14:21,840 » Yeah, I appreciate everything you've done for Beldon, too. Thanks. 1000 01:14:19,120 --> 01:14:25,896 » Thank you. Been a pleasure. >> Anybody else? [snorts] 1001 01:14:26,159 --> 01:14:30,480 Oh, >> Mr. Mayor, if I may, I I didn't realize 1002 01:14:29,280 --> 01:14:33,360 at the time when we did this work session that he's wanting to do to have 1003 01:14:32,320 --> 01:14:36,480 keep some of this information privileged. 1004 01:14:34,640 --> 01:14:39,040 » We we do have on the agenda for executive session real estate and 1005 01:14:37,840 --> 01:14:41,679 things. If he wanted to hang out a few minutes and get get to the executive 1006 01:14:40,640 --> 01:14:44,719 session, we could put him at the beginning and he and he could be more 1007 01:14:43,440 --> 01:14:47,280 detailed about the individual >> Yeah, we can do that. 1008 01:14:45,520 --> 01:14:50,239 » Stuff if he's if he's concerned with the confidentiality on some of this stuff. 1009 01:14:49,199 --> 01:14:53,600 Uh do you want to hang out? >> So, I mean the rents in there, 1010 01:14:52,080 --> 01:14:56,000 » that's a signed letter of intent. >> Yeah. the rents in there, what they're 1011 01:14:55,440 --> 01:14:58,719 doing. >> Of course, 1012 01:14:56,640 --> 01:15:02,719 » they don't want it public and there's an open records obviously we just heard 1013 01:15:01,600 --> 01:15:04,560 that a little bit. >> We'll do that. 1014 01:15:03,440 --> 01:15:07,360 » I'm just saying we can push we can postpone the rest of this discussion for 1015 01:15:05,920 --> 01:15:10,560 a few minutes until we get to executive session when it is a privileged 1016 01:15:09,040 --> 01:15:12,800 conversation and the rest of the public isn't available to see that. 1017 01:15:11,840 --> 01:15:15,199 » Whatever you all prefer. >> Yeah. 1018 01:15:13,360 --> 01:15:15,920 » You you okay with that, Patrick? >> Yeah. 1019 01:15:15,520 --> 01:15:19,679 » All right. >> I and I do have some questions. So, 1020 01:15:17,760 --> 01:15:25,040 » that's fine. All right. So, hang out for a few minutes, please. 1021 01:15:22,400 --> 01:15:28,920 to code enforcement parking driveways presented by city manager. 1022 01:15:34,640 --> 01:15:40,239 All right. Um we're this is the third in five installments we're discussing 1023 01:15:38,800 --> 01:15:42,880 discussing code enforcement and it doesn't need to take up all of our time, 1024 01:15:41,600 --> 01:15:47,199 but I just would like a little bit of feedback. Um specifically today, I'd 1025 01:15:45,120 --> 01:15:53,199 like to discuss the driveways and parking um in residential, specifically 1026 01:15:49,679 --> 01:15:58,880 single family residential. Um I've provided at your uh at the uh you know 1027 01:15:56,080 --> 01:16:04,080 kind of the existing code in section uh 26 of our code and ordinances uh uh 1028 01:16:02,080 --> 01:16:08,320 discussing residential driveways. You know um 2652 1029 01:16:06,480 --> 01:16:15,040 is you know driveway sizes and coverage limits. Of course those things um the 1030 01:16:12,239 --> 01:16:20,480 existence of this code comes came after a lot of the housing stock in our city 1031 01:16:16,880 --> 01:16:24,480 was built. So, um, obviously, yes, any new residential is going to have to 1032 01:16:21,920 --> 01:16:28,640 abide by these, uh, guidelines essentially, but that doesn't take into 1033 01:16:26,560 --> 01:16:32,800 account the pre-existing housing stock, which we have a lot of, that may not 1034 01:16:30,719 --> 01:16:39,280 meet these guidelines, right? So we're trying to to uh ex exist in a space that 1035 01:16:37,360 --> 01:16:43,760 marries, you know, what is best practices and what's best for the future 1036 01:16:41,520 --> 01:16:48,480 with what do we have now currently and how do we best utilize it and and make 1037 01:16:46,080 --> 01:16:50,159 it useful for our residents um and for the neighbors that are around the 1038 01:16:49,600 --> 01:16:53,040 residents. >> Mr. Wright, can you can you get sorry to 1039 01:16:52,000 --> 01:16:57,400 put you on the spot here, but can you give us that term you always use, 1040 01:16:54,400 --> 01:16:57,400 non-conforming? 1041 01:16:57,600 --> 01:17:02,719 » Legal non-conforming. >> Legal non-conforming. Okay, thanks. So 1042 01:17:01,360 --> 01:17:06,080 and then and then on the second page, you know, driveway paving materials and 1043 01:17:04,239 --> 01:17:10,080 this is kind of where we really um need to have the the most of our discussion 1044 01:17:08,159 --> 01:17:13,199 or my biggest question for you. You know, obviously paving materials says 1045 01:17:11,840 --> 01:17:16,640 all driveways will be paved with the permanent materials such as asphalt, 1046 01:17:14,640 --> 01:17:20,320 concrete, paving blocks or other approved material meeting the standards 1047 01:17:18,080 --> 01:17:23,600 of the city. Driveway aprons that are accessed in the rightway shall be 1048 01:17:21,600 --> 01:17:27,679 concrete to meet standard specifications for public improvements in the rightway. 1049 01:17:25,840 --> 01:17:30,880 Um, and the entire driving and parking surface of a driveway shall be paved 1050 01:17:29,440 --> 01:17:34,880 with a few exceptions. You know, interior sideyards, rear yards where 1051 01:17:33,440 --> 01:17:39,120 driveways extended, those types of things. It does discuss the existence of 1052 01:17:36,560 --> 01:17:44,800 ribbon driveways. Um, and give some some guidelines to that. Um, 1053 01:17:42,400 --> 01:17:48,560 or PA block driveways, those types of things. So, that that's what's existing, 1054 01:17:46,560 --> 01:17:56,239 I guess, is what what I'm trying to say. Um but that does not by any means or 1055 01:17:51,600 --> 01:18:01,040 stretch um allow us to essentially you know maintain what we have as existing 1056 01:17:59,440 --> 01:18:05,040 housing stock and how do we handle that from a code enforcement perspective and 1057 01:18:02,960 --> 01:18:11,679 what kind of codes do we need to allow those to exist. Um I know that there's 1058 01:18:08,159 --> 01:18:16,080 um if we discussed things like gravel um which we've allowed as a as a kind of a 1059 01:18:13,760 --> 01:18:21,280 legal nonconforming um for those that have it um as long as 1060 01:18:18,719 --> 01:18:24,719 they keep it up. Uh and I know that that public works um will get in up in arms 1061 01:18:23,360 --> 01:18:29,040 in a hurry if we start saying let's just let people use gravel all throughout 1062 01:18:26,800 --> 01:18:33,440 because we have obviously an issue with gravel when it comes to 1063 01:18:30,800 --> 01:18:38,880 our storm sewer um and how that's handled. Um, but what makes sense for 1064 01:18:36,560 --> 01:18:41,199 our residents? Do we do we want to allow and some people don't have anything. 1065 01:18:39,920 --> 01:18:44,560 They don't have any gravel. They've not had anything. There's you'll you can 1066 01:18:43,280 --> 01:18:48,560 drive around. You'll see a lot of folks driving, you know, parking on grass. Um, 1067 01:18:47,280 --> 01:18:53,040 there are a lot of properties where they've essentially taken that front, 1068 01:18:50,640 --> 01:18:59,280 you know, 10 feet or so off of the street and kind of made it like a little 1069 01:18:54,960 --> 01:19:04,320 pad site. Um, and there's any level of things whether it's grass or gravel or 1070 01:19:02,159 --> 01:19:08,000 used to be gravel or just dirt or you know that that exists throughout the 1071 01:19:05,679 --> 01:19:13,120 city as well. And so how do we want to handle that? Um, you know, overall we we 1072 01:19:12,080 --> 01:19:18,239 would definitely like some guidance because this is a situation that exists 1073 01:19:15,520 --> 01:19:22,480 all too commonly and we we want to be working with people but also trying to, 1074 01:19:21,120 --> 01:19:26,880 you know, maintain standards for residents and and neighbors. So, I how 1075 01:19:25,440 --> 01:19:32,520 how do you want us to handle, you know, the drive, the parking, those types of 1076 01:19:29,120 --> 01:19:32,520 of instances? 1077 01:19:32,880 --> 01:19:38,560 » Any thoughts? >> Are you you're talking so people that 1078 01:19:36,320 --> 01:19:42,320 have gravel driveways tell them they got by a certain date to concrete them or 1079 01:19:41,440 --> 01:19:45,040 pave them or >> not necessarily unless that's what 1080 01:19:43,600 --> 01:19:48,640 everybody everybody decides they want to do. I think that the in the past what 1081 01:19:47,040 --> 01:19:51,679 we've allowed to do and I don't think we're advocating for anything different 1082 01:19:50,159 --> 01:19:54,800 is that if they have gravel that they maintain the gravel and keep it. They 1083 01:19:53,360 --> 01:19:58,800 don't allow the gravel to dissipate to the point where it becomes grass and 1084 01:19:56,800 --> 01:20:03,040 then try to bring bring back the gravel is what that's kind of the issue. 1085 01:20:00,960 --> 01:20:05,360 » Yeah. I mean, I I would never support going out there and telling everybody, 1086 01:20:04,159 --> 01:20:07,920 "Hey, you got to have a gravel or you got to have a concrete driveway now." I 1087 01:20:07,120 --> 01:20:10,000 mean, that's >> I don't think anybody's advocating for 1088 01:20:09,199 --> 01:20:15,199 that at this point. >> Yeah. I I I'm not I don't think anybody 1089 01:20:13,840 --> 01:20:16,800 » staff's not even advocating for that at this point. I We just want some 1090 01:20:16,400 --> 01:20:20,239 guidelines. >> Go ahead. 1091 01:20:17,920 --> 01:20:26,640 I I guess I didn't realize if this is a 1092 01:20:23,600 --> 01:20:32,480 prevalent thing, but parking on grass in the front yard, especially specifically, 1093 01:20:29,600 --> 01:20:36,000 uh that is common, you're saying, in various 1094 01:20:34,880 --> 01:20:40,719 places. Yeah. I don't >> places that don't have a formal drive. 1095 01:20:37,760 --> 01:20:46,320 Yes. So you're I can think of maybe only a couple in my 1096 01:20:43,360 --> 01:20:52,239 ward, but maybe I'm okay. Um 1097 01:20:49,199 --> 01:20:55,600 I guess that's essentially not having a drive period, right? That's not gravel, 1098 01:20:54,159 --> 01:21:00,159 that's not paved, that's not a ribbon driveway, that's 1099 01:20:56,800 --> 01:21:04,320 » nothing. Um >> I could see where that might need to be 1100 01:21:02,080 --> 01:21:08,480 addressed. I can think of a couple of instances where we have a house and it's 1101 01:21:06,640 --> 01:21:13,120 on a street and there's not a really good there's not really good on street 1102 01:21:09,840 --> 01:21:16,800 parking available and there's no drive and there's folks that drive and park on 1103 01:21:15,040 --> 01:21:21,360 the grass because there literally is no way no place to drive on the or park on 1104 01:21:18,960 --> 01:21:24,880 the street and there's no place to park at the house formally so that there you 1105 01:21:23,120 --> 01:21:27,120 know they're parking the best place they can. 1106 01:21:25,280 --> 01:21:32,080 » Yeah, I guess my assumption has been you park on the street in those situations 1107 01:21:28,640 --> 01:21:35,120 but okay can we can we get a list? I would like to see some of these places 1108 01:21:33,360 --> 01:21:39,199 like what kind of conditions they are because I I can't think of one 1109 01:21:37,040 --> 01:21:42,400 specifically but I I would like to see what we're talking about. 1110 01:21:40,719 --> 01:21:44,960 » You mean as far as has nowhere to park and they're parking on in the in 1111 01:21:43,760 --> 01:21:49,120 » and they're parking in their yard essentially in their yard? Yeah. 1112 01:21:47,440 --> 01:21:53,360 » I could pick out a couple for sure. >> Okay. 1113 01:21:50,880 --> 01:21:58,239 » Go ahead. Um, I've had several people reach out to me just recently about um 1114 01:21:56,080 --> 01:22:03,199 the lack of driveway that their, you know, their rental and their driveways 1115 01:21:59,920 --> 01:22:08,080 are not provided by the landlord. Um, there's also been some big discussion um 1116 01:22:05,840 --> 01:22:12,880 with the code advisory committee about the ribbon driveways. We worked on that 1117 01:22:10,080 --> 01:22:18,080 for quite a long time. Um, I think that probably needs to be clarified a little 1118 01:22:14,719 --> 01:22:21,040 bit because I think, at least in my mind, when we were talking about a 1119 01:22:19,600 --> 01:22:24,639 ribbon driveway that they wouldn't necessarily have to connect to an 1120 01:22:22,719 --> 01:22:28,639 existing driveway, that they could come to the street even if it was with an 1121 01:22:26,800 --> 01:22:35,520 apron. And I think that's been a little bit of um confusion there. Um, 1122 01:22:33,199 --> 01:22:38,960 I can think of two in particular that I know that it's been permitted to do, but 1123 01:22:37,280 --> 01:22:43,760 they didn't they weren't understanding that they couldn't come to the street 1124 01:22:41,120 --> 01:22:48,880 with it, but because them tying on to their existing driveway was a with a 1125 01:22:45,679 --> 01:22:53,040 ribbon driveway made parking a big vehicle even more difficult because of 1126 01:22:50,560 --> 01:22:57,600 the hard turn they had to make off of a existing driveway. So, that I think 1127 01:22:54,960 --> 01:23:04,159 needs to be clarified a little bit. And um I can I can um tell you that in one 1128 01:23:01,520 --> 01:23:08,480 particular instance that there's a house, there's a camper, and 1129 01:23:06,159 --> 01:23:13,600 there's six other vehicles parked there, and there's no grass left. There's um 1130 01:23:11,280 --> 01:23:18,719 it's a it's a muddy mess when it's going on. And I I kind of like Alex says that, 1131 01:23:17,199 --> 01:23:24,080 you know, we need to take a little bit of better ownership with the front yard 1132 01:23:20,800 --> 01:23:27,920 in particular. Um, you know, maybe maybe you know, because there's on especially 1133 01:23:26,080 --> 01:23:33,440 in the old older neighborhoods, there's not room to park on the streets without 1134 01:23:29,600 --> 01:23:37,840 it being a public safety problem. Um, on in my ward specifically, there's four 1135 01:23:35,679 --> 01:23:42,000 houses on one street that have no driveways and they have to park on the 1136 01:23:40,159 --> 01:23:45,040 street and that means it's impossible to get a fire truck or anything through 1137 01:23:43,440 --> 01:23:49,199 there in the evenings when they're all parked there. So, I think we need to 1138 01:23:46,960 --> 01:23:53,040 tighten that up a little bit. Um, I'm for sure would like some clarity on the 1139 01:23:51,280 --> 01:23:58,080 ribbon driveways for sure. And I think we've got to come up with a standard. 1140 01:23:55,280 --> 01:24:02,560 You know, you can't have a camper in five trucks 1141 01:24:00,560 --> 01:24:07,679 or or you can have it, but you've got to figure out a way to manage it. 1142 01:24:05,120 --> 01:24:12,560 » Okay. So, are are you advocating then that on streets where there's not a sign 1143 01:24:10,960 --> 01:24:15,440 not sufficient space and there's not a drive and even if there's not a drive to 1144 01:24:14,000 --> 01:24:18,960 not allow folks? >> No, I don't think I mean, how can you do 1145 01:24:17,040 --> 01:24:21,120 that? That's my Yeah, I guess that's my point, too. 1146 01:24:19,440 --> 01:24:24,719 » But I don't know what the solution. I mean, 1147 01:24:22,719 --> 01:24:28,719 » I'm assuming at one point or the other those houses all had driveways, but I 1148 01:24:26,960 --> 01:24:32,159 don't know that, you know, because it's Oldtown for sure. 1149 01:24:30,639 --> 01:24:36,400 » So, you know, I don't know what the solution is if if there's never been a 1150 01:24:34,080 --> 01:24:41,360 driveway there, then what do you do? I mean, on the, you know, there's seven 1151 01:24:39,120 --> 01:24:45,280 cars parked there at night, >> right? [snorts] 1152 01:24:43,199 --> 01:24:48,639 Okay. Go ahead. I'll say I'm 1153 01:24:47,360 --> 01:24:50,960 Yeah, let's talk about the ribbon driveways. That was going to be my 1154 01:24:49,679 --> 01:24:55,840 second part of the conversation because I know I brought this up previously. Um 1155 01:24:54,000 --> 01:25:01,360 because I had a resident specifically complaining to me that their ribbon 1156 01:24:58,719 --> 01:25:05,520 driveway wasn't allowed and that the city was 1157 01:25:03,600 --> 01:25:08,719 well I don't know the city was they were working with the city but it was somehow 1158 01:25:07,360 --> 01:25:13,280 not allowed but this seems to suggest the otherwise. Can you help what? 1159 01:25:11,679 --> 01:25:16,239 This sounds to me like ribbon driveways are no problem. 1160 01:25:14,719 --> 01:25:20,800 » Specific. >> So ribbon driveways are a secondary 1161 01:25:18,719 --> 01:25:25,199 driveway. So they're allowed to come off of your primary driveway accessing the 1162 01:25:23,040 --> 01:25:30,639 street and they're allowed to be in the sidey yard and going to the back. So 1163 01:25:27,760 --> 01:25:34,960 they're mostly used to accessory structures in the backyard or if you 1164 01:25:33,199 --> 01:25:38,159 have a boat or camper or something that you need to pull on to the side of your 1165 01:25:36,400 --> 01:25:41,920 house or the backyard. So they're just not allowed as the prime. Like if you 1166 01:25:40,639 --> 01:25:45,120 only have one driveway, you can't have a ribbon driveway. 1167 01:25:42,800 --> 01:25:49,040 » Yeah. We were trying to balance the aesthetics because there were concerns 1168 01:25:46,960 --> 01:25:53,920 of ribbon driveways are in the front yard, people and our people are parking 1169 01:25:51,199 --> 01:25:59,120 on the ribbon driveway. All the grass and everything underneath is going to 1170 01:25:55,280 --> 01:26:02,080 die. So then then it's just a mud pit. Somebody eventually comes back in and 1171 01:26:00,560 --> 01:26:06,719 puts gravel or something else in between. So we're kind of back to this 1172 01:26:04,159 --> 01:26:10,480 the place where we started. So, we were trying to avoid that and 1173 01:26:09,040 --> 01:26:13,840 trying to push those into the side and rear yard that aren't as visible to the 1174 01:26:12,159 --> 01:26:19,360 street so they don't become as much of a nuisance. The the ribbon driveway with a 1175 01:26:17,600 --> 01:26:24,239 gravel in the middle. Now, I understand that's, you know, not allowed based on 1176 01:26:21,199 --> 01:26:29,280 what is currently in here, but is the is there a concern that that is problematic 1177 01:26:26,719 --> 01:26:32,080 from an aesthetics standpoint as long as again it's maintained? It's not, you 1178 01:26:30,800 --> 01:26:35,120 know, we don't have weeds growing up through it. We don't have, you know, 1179 01:26:33,280 --> 01:26:40,560 it's not a mud pit. not, you know, it's truly a is that I mean just generally is 1180 01:26:39,280 --> 01:26:44,960 that where that came from? Is that concern with the aesthetics? 1181 01:26:43,040 --> 01:26:49,760 » Yeah, I mean that's the primary concern is to 1182 01:26:47,280 --> 01:26:53,040 the the reason why there's a solid paved surface in the current code. So again, 1183 01:26:51,600 --> 01:26:57,040 we just added this a couple of years ago because it was a cost-effective approach 1184 01:26:55,040 --> 01:27:01,120 for people, especially because the requirement was if you're putting a 1185 01:26:58,880 --> 01:27:05,120 detached garage in your backyard, you need to have a paved surface and that 1186 01:27:02,880 --> 01:27:09,040 can be very cost prohibitive for people. So the ribbon driveway was the solution 1187 01:27:07,600 --> 01:27:13,600 to make that more affordable and feasible for people. Um, but the concern 1188 01:27:11,679 --> 01:27:20,239 of putting them in the front yard was the aesthetics of that. If it's not if 1189 01:27:16,719 --> 01:27:24,080 the area between the pavement tracks is not maintained, 1190 01:27:22,239 --> 01:27:28,480 then you're just you either end up with an area that's has no vegetation or they 1191 01:27:27,040 --> 01:27:32,880 come back and put rock or something else. And the concern with the gravel in 1192 01:27:31,040 --> 01:27:38,719 the front is that it washes out into the street or into the storm drains. 1193 01:27:36,000 --> 01:27:44,400 » Go ahead, Brett. I saw uh one ribbon with artificial turf 1194 01:27:42,320 --> 01:27:47,199 in between to make it look quite attractive. 1195 01:27:46,719 --> 01:27:53,280 » Go ahead. >> So, I know W three has a lot of back 1196 01:27:49,679 --> 01:27:58,159 alleyways that are gravel um with grass grown up. Who is responsible for the 1197 01:27:55,440 --> 01:28:04,719 alleys behind the behind the houses? Is that city? Is that okay? 1198 01:28:02,080 --> 01:28:07,600 So, are we going to hold ourself to the same standard that we're going to hold 1199 01:28:06,239 --> 01:28:11,360 everybody else to? cuz there's a lot of alleyways that have a lot of weeds and 1200 01:28:09,600 --> 01:28:19,120 grass growing up through. Some of them you can't even get through. So, it's 1201 01:28:14,639 --> 01:28:22,320 it's the same thing as a driveway. So, 1202 01:28:20,719 --> 01:28:25,440 are we are we going to hold ourselves to that same standard? 1203 01:28:24,639 --> 01:28:29,280 » We should. >> I'm just I'm just asking because I know 1204 01:28:27,280 --> 01:28:34,560 » Ideally, we would again, if you have the money tree to help us to fix all those, 1205 01:28:31,520 --> 01:28:38,000 then we'd be glad to utilize it. >> Go ahead. You're done. So, are you done? 1206 01:28:37,679 --> 01:28:43,679 » Go ahead. >> I under my my biggest problem is front 1207 01:28:41,360 --> 01:28:47,199 yard parking and the fact that, you know, that you can't in some of these 1208 01:28:45,679 --> 01:28:50,880 instances, you can't see the house because of the vehicles. Um, I know that 1209 01:28:49,600 --> 01:28:56,000 this is not something we're talking about now, but I would like it to to 1210 01:28:53,040 --> 01:29:01,120 look at in our um in our comprehensive plan code ideas is, you know, there are 1211 01:28:58,880 --> 01:29:04,960 other solutions to loose gravel that involve gravel. you know, they have the 1212 01:29:03,120 --> 01:29:08,080 new spring form things now that you put down and it holds gravel in place and 1213 01:29:06,480 --> 01:29:15,760 there's epoxy and there's all sorts of stuff. So, you know, I um I recently uh 1214 01:29:13,040 --> 01:29:20,880 looked at adding an extension on my driveway and 1215 01:29:18,480 --> 01:29:25,199 resurfacing my driveway because I was adding an extension and it was uh 1216 01:29:23,679 --> 01:29:29,040 $14,000 which is a little cost, you know, then I 1217 01:29:27,199 --> 01:29:32,960 had to in turn do the sewer so, you know, it was kind of a wash there. But, 1218 01:29:30,880 --> 01:29:38,719 um, I'd like to look at something, you know, in our community development, 1219 01:29:37,120 --> 01:29:42,960 you know, to to come up with some more permeable ideas or some more 1220 01:29:41,280 --> 01:29:48,239 cost-effective ideas. And I know that that's not what we're talking about now, 1221 01:29:44,880 --> 01:29:51,600 but um I, you know, ribbon driveways are the thing I get the most complaints 1222 01:29:49,520 --> 01:29:56,960 about in people parking so that they they no longer have a yard. There's so 1223 01:29:53,440 --> 01:30:02,159 many vehicles. So, >> all right. [sighs] 1224 01:29:58,960 --> 01:30:09,520 Anybody else? Item three, Cozy Pet Hotel, SUP Renewal. 1225 01:30:06,800 --> 01:30:13,520 » Yeah, Cozy Pet Hotel is located at 342 North Scott. Um, and they are an animal 1226 01:30:11,760 --> 01:30:17,679 services boarding use that provides overnight and longer term stays. Um, 1227 01:30:16,000 --> 01:30:22,159 they received a 5-year special use permit in 2021, which is due for 1228 01:30:19,920 --> 01:30:27,199 renewal. Um, since then they've also acquired 400 North Scott um, back in 1229 01:30:24,719 --> 01:30:30,800 2024 and they completed a remodel of that building and opened in 2025 for 1230 01:30:29,280 --> 01:30:35,120 grooming and other non-boarding services. Um, staff recommends adding 1231 01:30:33,360 --> 01:30:39,280 that property or that building to their special use permit to provide additional 1232 01:30:36,719 --> 01:30:42,800 flexibility. Um, to their business needs if they decide to use part of that 1233 01:30:40,719 --> 01:30:45,600 second building for boarding. Um, a public hearing for the renewal will be 1234 01:30:44,239 --> 01:30:48,960 heard by the planning commission next Tuesday, September 15th, and this item 1235 01:30:47,600 --> 01:30:54,040 will be brought forward to council in October. Any questions? 1236 01:30:55,040 --> 01:31:02,960 Hearing none. Number four, Little Fleet SU and final plat. Yes, we have um also 1237 01:31:01,360 --> 01:31:07,040 received a reasonzoning and a special use permit as well as platting request 1238 01:31:04,800 --> 01:31:10,960 for Little's Fleet maintenance um which is proposed to be located at the former 1239 01:31:09,040 --> 01:31:15,280 Master Transportation facility at 800 Quicktrip Way. Um, Little's fleet works 1240 01:31:13,840 --> 01:31:19,440 with commercial customers on the upfitting of vehicles for commercial 1241 01:31:17,199 --> 01:31:23,920 vehicle fleets, uh, with most of their customers using small trucks that do not 1242 01:31:21,360 --> 01:31:28,960 require CDLs. Um, they have at least one customer that has semi-truck vehicles, 1243 01:31:25,840 --> 01:31:33,199 which they estimate, um, submits about 100 vehicles to them a year. Um, based 1244 01:31:31,520 --> 01:31:38,000 on the nature of the business, uh, this is a vehicle repair heavy use requiring 1245 01:31:35,280 --> 01:31:41,760 reszoning to C3 regional commercial, uh, with a special use permit. Um, this 1246 01:31:40,159 --> 01:31:45,520 would have been the same requirement to make Masters Transportation a legal 1247 01:31:43,600 --> 01:31:49,199 conforming land use had they remained at that site. Um, as part of the special 1248 01:31:47,760 --> 01:31:52,560 use permit, staff is coordinating with the applicant and the owner on bringing 1249 01:31:50,480 --> 01:31:57,040 the landscaping and screening up to compliance with the code along with an 1250 01:31:54,719 --> 01:32:01,600 updated parking plan uh, which includes paving the gravel lot that is along 1251 01:31:58,719 --> 01:32:06,400 Marquy Parkway. Um, the property is also currently two unplatted parcels that 1252 01:32:03,520 --> 01:32:09,440 will be combined into a single lot. Um public hearing is scheduled for October 1253 01:32:07,920 --> 01:32:13,280 6th planning commission and this item will be brought forward to council 1254 01:32:11,199 --> 01:32:18,159 after. >> Go ahead. 1255 01:32:16,159 --> 01:32:22,159 » See there you used legal conforming not not anyways. Um which means they must 1256 01:32:20,400 --> 01:32:26,560 have been legal non-conforming prior. So that's where my question's going 1257 01:32:23,600 --> 01:32:32,400 essentially is that so this sounds very similar. I mean I know not the same but 1258 01:32:28,800 --> 01:32:36,080 similar in idea of masters um for that area. Is that accurate in 1259 01:32:35,120 --> 01:32:39,360 how I'm thinking about this? >> Correct. It's very It falls into the 1260 01:32:37,920 --> 01:32:47,280 same land use category. >> Okay. And yeah, updating of landscaping 1261 01:32:43,679 --> 01:32:50,000 would be nice in that area, I think. So, >> I think they've already talked about 1262 01:32:48,639 --> 01:32:57,199 that and are getting ready to work on that, too. So, anybody else? 1263 01:32:55,280 --> 01:33:00,400 Item, I'd entertain a motion to enter executive session to discuss mayor tain 1264 01:32:58,880 --> 01:33:04,400 to legal actions according Missouri State Statute 610.021.1 021.1 pertain to 1265 01:33:03,040 --> 01:33:07,520 lease and purchase seller real estate according to Missouri state statute 1266 01:33:05,760 --> 01:33:12,080 610.021.2 pertaining to negotiated contracts state 1267 01:33:09,520 --> 01:33:13,679 statute 610.021.12 021.12 as the record be closed and meeting adjourned from 1268 01:33:13,280 --> 01:33:17,280 there. >> Present. 1269 01:33:14,719 --> 01:33:21,760 » Have a motion in a second. Any discussion? 1270 01:33:19,120 --> 01:33:23,520 Roll call. >> Council member Richardson. 1271 01:33:23,120 --> 01:33:24,639 » I. >> Thompson. 1272 01:33:24,320 --> 01:33:25,920 » Yes. >> Mayor Larkkey. 1273 01:33:25,520 --> 01:33:26,960 » I. >> Davidson. 1274 01:33:26,560 --> 01:33:28,159 » Yes. >> Brian. 1275 01:33:27,760 --> 01:33:29,199 » I. >> White. 1276 01:33:28,800 --> 01:33:30,159 » I. >> Lawson. 1277 01:33:29,760 --> 01:33:31,360 » I. >> McCllum. 1278 01:33:30,880 --> 01:33:36,280 » I. >> Johnson. Hi. Motion passes.