1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:04,160 Belvadier City Council meeting for 2 00:00:02,000 --> 00:00:05,680 Monday, July the 13th. Beth, can you 3 00:00:04,160 --> 00:00:08,559 call the role? 4 00:00:05,680 --> 00:00:09,120 » Council member Cooper 5 00:00:08,559 --> 00:00:10,160 » Present. 6 00:00:09,120 --> 00:00:10,880 » Council member Burke 7 00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:12,240 » Here. 8 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:12,960 » Uh, Mayor Wilkinson 9 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:14,000 » Present. 10 00:00:12,960 --> 00:00:14,400 » Council member Mark 11 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:17,279 » Here. 12 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:19,680 » Council member Carropet here. 13 00:00:17,279 --> 00:00:21,439 » Great. We will um adjourn into close 14 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:25,119 session. Do I have to read the items or 15 00:00:21,439 --> 00:00:27,599 not? No. Okay. 16 00:00:25,119 --> 00:00:28,880 Sorry, not awake. Can is there any 17 00:00:27,599 --> 00:00:29,920 public comment on the close session 18 00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:31,840 agenda items? 19 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:35,800 » There are no public present. Okay. Thank 20 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:35,800 you. And we will adjourn. 21 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:36,479 Great. I will reconvene our um 22 00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:38,799 city council meeting for Monday, July 23 00:01:36,479 --> 00:01:41,439 13th. There is nothing to report out 24 00:01:38,799 --> 00:01:45,040 from the close session. 25 00:01:41,439 --> 00:01:46,479 Um we will therefore move on to um item 26 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:48,960 number three, which is reports and 27 00:01:46,479 --> 00:01:51,040 presentations. So firstly, city council 28 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:52,640 reports. Does any council member have a 29 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:56,240 report? 30 00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:59,200 Okay. Um, so I attended the um RBR 31 00:01:56,240 --> 00:02:04,880 meeting um this month and or actually 32 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:07,439 last week and um we were um uh able to 33 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:09,679 um receive funds from the Marin 34 00:02:07,439 --> 00:02:14,640 Community Foundation 35 00:02:09,679 --> 00:02:18,879 um to a grant um for the monitoring of 36 00:02:14,640 --> 00:02:20,400 the eel grass with a new submersible um 37 00:02:18,879 --> 00:02:24,640 device 38 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:29,599 and also that the um county added to 39 00:02:24,640 --> 00:02:32,959 their 2627th budget the $300,000 40 00:02:29,599 --> 00:02:37,280 shortfall for the housing in um the 41 00:02:32,959 --> 00:02:40,959 current RBR um budget. And a big thank 42 00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:44,080 you went to Supervisor Stephanie 43 00:02:40,959 --> 00:02:48,160 Molton Peters for her championing this 44 00:02:44,080 --> 00:02:52,080 with the county and for um future county 45 00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:58,560 um resources um to provide um the 46 00:02:52,080 --> 00:03:00,879 housing u portion of RB's um mandate. 47 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:05,440 That's it. 48 00:03:00,879 --> 00:03:07,599 Anybody else? Jane, 49 00:03:05,440 --> 00:03:11,120 » Council member Carropia and I attended 50 00:03:07,599 --> 00:03:13,440 the annual Abag meeting in June and 51 00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:16,879 unfortunately the report from them about 52 00:03:13,440 --> 00:03:20,720 the um housing element number seven um 53 00:03:16,879 --> 00:03:23,599 was not very positive. uh they think the 54 00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:26,560 numbers are going to go up and they also 55 00:03:23,599 --> 00:03:28,800 said on what they considered plus side 56 00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:30,879 that the state will be releasing the 57 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:33,280 numbers HCD will be releasing the 58 00:03:30,879 --> 00:03:37,440 numbers a year earlier than they did in 59 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:39,519 the past and that um uh jurisdictions 60 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:42,080 should consider 61 00:03:39,519 --> 00:03:44,319 uh beginning their process as soon as 62 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:47,599 they hear what their number is and not 63 00:03:44,319 --> 00:03:52,480 wait even though uh the date that 64 00:03:47,599 --> 00:03:54,879 element six is finished is uh 2031. 65 00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:58,000 So they were recommending people start 66 00:03:54,879 --> 00:04:00,080 even as soon as 2728 67 00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:02,400 uh given that the number will be given 68 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:06,000 out at that point. 69 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:09,799 So not a fun meeting but we were there. 70 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,799 That's it. Thank you. 71 00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:13,360 » Anybody else? 72 00:04:11,519 --> 00:04:15,760 » Nothing to report. 73 00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:19,519 » Uh okay. I just wanted to uh report 74 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:21,359 briefly on um marine clean energy or MCE 75 00:04:19,519 --> 00:04:23,919 as it's now known. Um I serve as 76 00:04:21,359 --> 00:04:26,400 Bvadier's representative um to the 77 00:04:23,919 --> 00:04:28,560 agency and MCE provides electricity 78 00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:30,800 generation to almost all residents in 79 00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:32,560 Balvadier. Um it's gone through some 80 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:34,639 pretty significant changes over the last 81 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:37,520 month. Um there was a very critical 82 00:04:34,639 --> 00:04:41,120 grand jury report that was published. Um 83 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:44,639 and the longtime CEO um departed from 84 00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:46,400 the agency in the past month as well. Um 85 00:04:44,639 --> 00:04:50,320 it's a challenging time for marine clean 86 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:53,520 energy but I regard these um changes as 87 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:57,360 an opportunity to strengthen MCE and the 88 00:04:53,520 --> 00:04:59,759 board is working aggressively to 89 00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:01,040 hire has hired an independent governance 90 00:04:59,759 --> 00:05:04,000 consultant to look at the board 91 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:06,000 structure um as well as put in place a 92 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:08,800 search committee to look for a permanent 93 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:11,919 CEO. Um, sitting on this board, I have 94 00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:13,680 always advocated for um, strong 95 00:05:11,919 --> 00:05:15,840 governance and procurement decisions 96 00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:17,600 that balance affordability, reliability 97 00:05:15,840 --> 00:05:20,000 and our climate goals and I will 98 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:22,400 continue to do so and do think that 99 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:24,560 these changes while difficult will will 100 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:27,600 lead in that direction. 101 00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:29,680 Um, if nobody has any further comment 102 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:31,680 from the dis, can I see whether there's 103 00:05:29,680 --> 00:05:34,160 any public comment on city council 104 00:05:31,680 --> 00:05:35,680 reports? 105 00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:36,639 Seeing none in the room, is there 106 00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:38,000 anything online? 107 00:05:36,639 --> 00:05:38,479 » Mayor Wilkinson, there are no hands 108 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:39,759 raised. 109 00:05:38,479 --> 00:05:41,680 » Great. In that case, we'll move on to 110 00:05:39,759 --> 00:05:43,440 3B, which is our city manager report. 111 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:44,880 Robert? 112 00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:46,400 » Yes. Good evening, mayor and council 113 00:05:44,880 --> 00:05:48,080 members. Uh we do have a full agenda 114 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:51,199 tonight, so I'll be brief. I wanted to 115 00:05:48,080 --> 00:05:53,600 point out a new item category on the 116 00:05:51,199 --> 00:05:55,919 agenda this evening. It's number seven, 117 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:57,520 future agenda items. Uh many, many 118 00:05:55,919 --> 00:05:59,440 agencies include this as part of the 119 00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:01,759 regular meetings. I think it's a helpful 120 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:04,240 tool and a transparent way for council 121 00:06:01,759 --> 00:06:06,639 members to suggest issues or topics for 122 00:06:04,240 --> 00:06:08,240 future consideration. I'll describe the 123 00:06:06,639 --> 00:06:10,720 functionality and parameters of that 124 00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:12,720 item as we get to it later this evening. 125 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:14,479 Uh switching gears, Malard Point has 126 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:16,800 seen some significant movement in the 127 00:06:14,479 --> 00:06:18,639 past month. After confirming with legal, 128 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:19,840 the city has determined that most of the 129 00:06:18,639 --> 00:06:22,240 conditions of approval for the 130 00:06:19,840 --> 00:06:24,000 demolition permit have been met. Staff 131 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:26,000 held a community meeting last Thursday 132 00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:28,479 to discuss the nuances of the project 133 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:30,400 with residents and answer questions. The 134 00:06:28,479 --> 00:06:32,000 city committed to double-checking again 135 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:34,639 that all the conditions of approval for 136 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:36,800 the permit have been satisfied and also 137 00:06:34,639 --> 00:06:38,960 posting some requested documents to the 138 00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:42,560 city's website. As of today, we do 139 00:06:38,960 --> 00:06:44,479 expect to issue the permit very soon. 140 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:47,199 One ongoing challenge with this project 141 00:06:44,479 --> 00:06:49,759 has been communicating uh complex ideas 142 00:06:47,199 --> 00:06:51,199 and consistent updates to the community. 143 00:06:49,759 --> 00:06:52,800 To address this, the city has 144 00:06:51,199 --> 00:06:54,560 established a working group that will 145 00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:57,600 meet weekly to review the project 146 00:06:54,560 --> 00:07:00,240 status, timelines, deliverables, and 147 00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:01,680 community inquiries. On the Monday 148 00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:03,440 following each meeting, the group will 149 00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:05,360 issue a weekly update to community 150 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:07,680 members subscribed to the Malard Point 151 00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:09,199 updates. Members of the working group 152 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:11,280 group will include the director of 153 00:07:09,199 --> 00:07:13,360 planning, the building official, city 154 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:15,039 engineer, and council members Burke and 155 00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:16,880 Mark. 156 00:07:15,039 --> 00:07:18,720 Um, in the meantime, the community 157 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:21,199 members can submit questions or feedback 158 00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:23,039 via the report an issue feature that is 159 00:07:21,199 --> 00:07:24,319 on the city's website. So, that's all I 160 00:07:23,039 --> 00:07:25,680 have for now. I'm happy to take 161 00:07:24,319 --> 00:07:27,280 questions. 162 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:29,919 » Do council members have any questions 163 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:33,120 for our city manager? 164 00:07:29,919 --> 00:07:37,039 » Um, I did have one question about Malard 165 00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:40,880 Point. Um I know that there was a lot of 166 00:07:37,039 --> 00:07:44,240 comments at the meeting on meeting the 167 00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:48,240 COAs as you mentioned and I know in the 168 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:49,759 past our engineer Mr. Mo had written 169 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:52,960 completeness 170 00:07:49,759 --> 00:07:56,479 letters his most recent one was June 171 00:07:52,960 --> 00:08:00,560 22nd but I wondered if he had written a 172 00:07:56,479 --> 00:08:03,360 completeness letter for what's um what's 173 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:05,759 complete this point. Is he planning on 174 00:08:03,360 --> 00:08:09,960 doing that or not? 175 00:08:05,759 --> 00:08:09,960 » Yes, I'm guessing it's coming soon. 176 00:08:11,039 --> 00:08:16,400 » At this point, we um 177 00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:19,360 he's finished his sort of completeness 178 00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:21,840 check and it has been deemed 179 00:08:19,360 --> 00:08:23,199 complete. However, we are double triple 180 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:25,360 checking all of the conditions of 181 00:08:23,199 --> 00:08:27,759 approval. So, there will not be another 182 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:29,599 completeness or incompleteness letters. 183 00:08:27,759 --> 00:08:31,280 » So, they're really incompleteness 184 00:08:29,599 --> 00:08:33,039 letters, not completeness letter. 185 00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:33,440 » Exactly. Okay, thanks for explaining 186 00:08:33,039 --> 00:08:35,519 that. 187 00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:36,959 » Sure. 188 00:08:35,519 --> 00:08:38,800 » Any other questions from council 189 00:08:36,959 --> 00:08:40,240 members? 190 00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:41,760 Seeing none, let's open this up for 191 00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:43,519 public comment. If anyone would like to 192 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:46,680 make public comment, please come up to 193 00:08:43,519 --> 00:08:46,680 the stand 194 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:54,480 although it's not required. If you 195 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:56,800 wouldn't mind uh just saying your your 196 00:08:54,480 --> 00:08:57,920 your name and limit your comment to 197 00:08:56,800 --> 00:09:00,080 three minutes, please. 198 00:08:57,920 --> 00:09:02,399 » Yes, of course. 199 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:04,640 and speaking to the mic, please. Is it 200 00:09:02,399 --> 00:09:07,120 on? 201 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:07,839 » Is it on now? No. Yeah. 202 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:10,000 » Closer. 203 00:09:07,839 --> 00:09:11,839 » Closer. Yes. Like that. Okay. 204 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:14,240 » Thank you. 205 00:09:11,839 --> 00:09:16,560 » Um, good evening, council members and 206 00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:18,959 mayor Wilkinson. My name is Robin 207 00:09:16,560 --> 00:09:21,200 Watson, and I'm speaking on behalf of 208 00:09:18,959 --> 00:09:25,279 the Beladier Residents for Intelligent 209 00:09:21,200 --> 00:09:27,760 Growth, Brig. On July 9th, our attorney 210 00:09:25,279 --> 00:09:29,839 sent Director Marwick a detailed letter 211 00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:32,800 about the Malard Point demolition 212 00:09:29,839 --> 00:09:35,360 permit. That letter isn't a request to 213 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:38,080 open the Malard Point approval. It asks 214 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:40,640 the city to do something much simpler. 215 00:09:38,080 --> 00:09:43,519 Explain its reasoning in writing before 216 00:09:40,640 --> 00:09:46,320 22 homes come down and their residents 217 00:09:43,519 --> 00:09:48,720 displaced. Specifically, we asked the 218 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:51,680 city to confirm that the June tenative 219 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:54,640 map extension did not approve standalone 220 00:09:51,680 --> 00:09:57,040 demolition. We ask for a determination 221 00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:59,600 on whether demolishing first before the 222 00:09:57,040 --> 00:10:02,320 final map, infrastructure, and bulkhead 223 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:04,399 work is a minor detail or a material 224 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:06,320 change to the project as it was 225 00:10:04,399 --> 00:10:08,399 approved. 226 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:11,279 And we asked the city to confirm that 227 00:10:08,399 --> 00:10:13,519 conditions marked pending or not needed 228 00:10:11,279 --> 00:10:17,120 on the compliance table are actually 229 00:10:13,519 --> 00:10:19,360 satisfied, not just checked off. None of 230 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:22,160 this is complicated. It's simply asking 231 00:10:19,360 --> 00:10:24,160 the city to show its work. Right now, 232 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:27,200 residents have a spreadsheet with check 233 00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:28,880 marks and no explanation. That's not 234 00:10:27,200 --> 00:10:30,399 enough when the decision is 235 00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:32,480 irreversible. 236 00:10:30,399 --> 00:10:35,279 Again, we're not asking the council to 237 00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:37,839 deny this permit outright at this time. 238 00:10:35,279 --> 00:10:40,240 We're asking that before it is issued, 239 00:10:37,839 --> 00:10:42,800 the city respond in writing to each of 240 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:44,160 the six requests in our letter and that 241 00:10:42,800 --> 00:10:46,720 our letter be placed in the 242 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:49,839 administrative record. Belvadier 243 00:10:46,720 --> 00:10:52,000 residents deserve to see the reasoning, 244 00:10:49,839 --> 00:10:52,399 not just the result. 245 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:54,560 » Thank you. 246 00:10:52,399 --> 00:10:58,600 » Thank you. 247 00:10:54,560 --> 00:10:58,600 » Is there any other public comment? 248 00:11:09,680 --> 00:11:14,240 » Good evening. My name is Randy Binstock 249 00:11:12,079 --> 00:11:17,279 and I'm a Belvadier Lagoon resident and 250 00:11:14,240 --> 00:11:20,399 have been since 1984. 251 00:11:17,279 --> 00:11:22,560 I want to ask a simple question tonight. 252 00:11:20,399 --> 00:11:25,440 Why is there a rush to issue this 253 00:11:22,560 --> 00:11:28,079 demolition permit right now? 254 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:30,000 The city's own June 8th staff report 255 00:11:28,079 --> 00:11:32,000 said the demolition permit, the 256 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:34,959 infrastructure permit, and the bulkhead 257 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:37,200 permit were not before the council. 258 00:11:34,959 --> 00:11:40,240 Staff said the applicant hadn't yet met 259 00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:42,720 all the required conditions. And yet, 260 00:11:40,240 --> 00:11:44,560 weeks later, we're told a compliance 261 00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:48,079 table shows everything is basically 262 00:11:44,560 --> 00:11:50,720 ready to go. Demolishing 22 homes is not 263 00:11:48,079 --> 00:11:52,880 something you can undo. Once those 264 00:11:50,720 --> 00:11:54,720 structures come down, there's no putting 265 00:11:52,880 --> 00:11:56,640 them back. If it turns out the 266 00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:59,200 sequencing wasn't authorized or the 267 00:11:56,640 --> 00:12:01,600 bulkhead work stalls or financing falls 268 00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:03,279 through. So, what is the harm in slowing 269 00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:06,240 down and making sure the conditions of 270 00:12:03,279 --> 00:12:08,959 approval are truly met? If the city is 271 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:11,440 confident every condition is truly met, 272 00:12:08,959 --> 00:12:13,360 not just normally checked off, but 273 00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:15,680 backed by complete reviewed and publicly 274 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,920 available materials, then a short delay 275 00:12:15,680 --> 00:12:19,680 costs nothing. But if the rush is 276 00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:22,639 because of pressure from the applicant's 277 00:12:19,680 --> 00:12:24,720 schedule, that is not good enough to 278 00:12:22,639 --> 00:12:27,120 it's not a good enough reason to accept 279 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:30,880 the risk of a demol demolitioned 280 00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:32,959 unstable half-finished waterfront site. 281 00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:35,519 We're asking the council to direct staff 282 00:12:32,959 --> 00:12:38,560 to take the time needed to make these um 283 00:12:35,519 --> 00:12:41,760 determinations properly in public before 284 00:12:38,560 --> 00:12:44,000 any permit is released. Since it was the 285 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:46,320 city council's decision to deny SQL 286 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:48,240 involvement, the city took on the entire 287 00:12:46,320 --> 00:12:50,160 responsibility to make sure that the 288 00:12:48,240 --> 00:12:52,880 environmental conditions of approval are 289 00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:56,160 met and that the lagoon remains in the 290 00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:59,279 pristine condition it is today. Before 291 00:12:56,160 --> 00:13:02,079 any permit is released, please slow down 292 00:12:59,279 --> 00:13:04,560 and get it right. Thank you. 293 00:13:02,079 --> 00:13:08,120 » Thank you. Do we have any other public 294 00:13:04,560 --> 00:13:08,120 comment in the room? 295 00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:19,760 » Good evening, 296 00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:21,600 Mayor Wilkinson and city council. My 297 00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:24,480 name is Kathy Store and I'm a resident 298 00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:26,800 here in Belvadier. Um, I want to talk to 299 00:13:24,480 --> 00:13:30,079 you about what actually happens on the 300 00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:33,279 ground if this goes wrong. First, the 301 00:13:30,079 --> 00:13:36,240 Belvadier Lagoon, the bulkheads along 302 00:13:33,279 --> 00:13:38,639 this site are old and the Army Corps 303 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:42,320 authorization for that work has already 304 00:13:38,639 --> 00:13:45,760 expired. The applicant's own materials 305 00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:48,880 say there's no construction or drainage 306 00:13:45,760 --> 00:13:51,200 worth including drainage work included 307 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:53,200 in that permit in this permit. But 308 00:13:51,200 --> 00:13:56,399 demolition equipment operating right 309 00:13:53,200 --> 00:13:59,120 next to the aging unpermitted bulkheads 310 00:13:56,399 --> 00:14:02,639 is not nothing. If those bulkheads are 311 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:05,680 dis are disturbed or destabilized during 312 00:14:02,639 --> 00:14:08,399 demolition, we could see erosion, 313 00:14:05,680 --> 00:14:10,720 sediment, and water quality impacts in 314 00:14:08,399 --> 00:14:14,079 the lagoon that this permit was never 315 00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:15,600 evaluated against. Second, think about 316 00:14:14,079 --> 00:14:18,079 what this site looks like if 317 00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:20,320 construction doesn't follow on schedule. 318 00:14:18,079 --> 00:14:23,839 This applicant has told the city there 319 00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:26,560 is no material change to its plans, but 320 00:14:23,839 --> 00:14:29,440 it's now proposing to knock down 22 321 00:14:26,560 --> 00:14:31,920 homes as a standalone first phase with 322 00:14:29,440 --> 00:14:33,360 the final mapping, financing, 323 00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:36,560 infrastructure, and bulkhead 324 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:38,959 replacement, all still unresolved. If 325 00:14:36,560 --> 00:14:42,000 any of those pieces stall and big 326 00:14:38,959 --> 00:14:45,279 waterfront projects stall all the time, 327 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:48,079 Belvadier is left with a fenced, vacant, 328 00:14:45,279 --> 00:14:51,839 demolished lot on the lagoon. Not for 329 00:14:48,079 --> 00:14:54,160 months, potentially for years. We are 330 00:14:51,839 --> 00:14:57,120 asking the council to require a real 331 00:14:54,160 --> 00:14:59,600 stabilization plan and a bond big enough 332 00:14:57,120 --> 00:15:02,399 to actually secure the site, not just 333 00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:04,800 cover debris debris removal, so that if 334 00:15:02,399 --> 00:15:06,959 this project stalls, Belvadier isn't 335 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:09,279 left holding an eyesore and an 336 00:15:06,959 --> 00:15:10,320 environmental risk on the waterfront. 337 00:15:09,279 --> 00:15:15,720 Thank you. 338 00:15:10,320 --> 00:15:15,720 » Thank you. Do we have anybody else? 339 00:15:21,839 --> 00:15:27,760 Jill Barnett. And um I've been coming to 340 00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:30,079 these meetings and coming to these 341 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:32,240 meetings because I want to keep trying 342 00:15:30,079 --> 00:15:34,959 to understand what the rules are for 343 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:37,920 this project, 344 00:15:34,959 --> 00:15:40,240 what they require and whether they are 345 00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:43,040 being consistently followed. One 346 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:45,680 condition says, let me read it. All 347 00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:47,360 demolition and site work including 348 00:15:45,680 --> 00:15:49,839 cleaning 349 00:15:47,360 --> 00:15:52,240 clearing of all debris and materials 350 00:15:49,839 --> 00:15:55,360 from the site shall be completed within 351 00:15:52,240 --> 00:15:59,440 75 days of issuance of a demolition 352 00:15:55,360 --> 00:16:01,680 permit. So that's 75 days. All 353 00:15:59,440 --> 00:16:03,839 demolition and site work including 354 00:16:01,680 --> 00:16:06,800 clearing of all debris and materials 355 00:16:03,839 --> 00:16:09,519 from the site shall be completed within 356 00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:12,639 75 days of issuance of a demolition 357 00:16:09,519 --> 00:16:16,240 permit. That's not just the building 358 00:16:12,639 --> 00:16:18,320 demolition. It says all demolition and 359 00:16:16,240 --> 00:16:21,360 clearing of debris and materials from 360 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:24,160 the site. But the current demo permit 361 00:16:21,360 --> 00:16:26,959 application is only for the buildings, 362 00:16:24,160 --> 00:16:30,000 not for the bulkheads, not the roadway, 363 00:16:26,959 --> 00:16:32,160 not the utilities, not the docks. Those 364 00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:34,959 demolition permits are still to come or 365 00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:37,839 pending with unresolved technical 366 00:16:34,959 --> 00:16:40,320 issues. various approvals and expired 367 00:16:37,839 --> 00:16:43,759 agency authorization still being worked 368 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:48,560 out. So, here's the question. How 369 00:16:43,759 --> 00:16:52,160 exactly does a 75day clock work uh work 370 00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:55,279 when major parts of all demolition and 371 00:16:52,160 --> 00:16:57,839 site work aren't even part of this demo 372 00:16:55,279 --> 00:17:00,480 permit? Is it the city applying the 373 00:16:57,839 --> 00:17:03,199 75day deadline only to this particular 374 00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:05,199 demolition permit? And doesn't that 375 00:17:03,199 --> 00:17:07,520 contradict the condition as it's 376 00:17:05,199 --> 00:17:09,439 written? 377 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:12,160 Then what if the rest of the demolition 378 00:17:09,439 --> 00:17:15,360 work can't realistically happen in 75 379 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:17,600 days? What happens to the site after 75? 380 00:17:15,360 --> 00:17:20,400 If bulkhead permits, site improvements, 381 00:17:17,600 --> 00:17:22,240 final map approval are still pending. 382 00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:25,120 Will it be left vacant until the 383 00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:27,439 bulldozers move in again? Before the 384 00:17:25,120 --> 00:17:30,240 demolition permit is issued, we're 385 00:17:27,439 --> 00:17:33,440 asking the city to require the applicant 386 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:36,240 to show in writing a realistic schedule 387 00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:38,880 that actually accounts for all for the 388 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:41,520 full scope of demolition work the 389 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:44,640 condition requires, not just the portion 390 00:17:41,520 --> 00:17:47,200 that's convenient to schedule first. 391 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:49,360 That seems like a reasonable request to 392 00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:52,240 make sure the city is following its own 393 00:17:49,360 --> 00:17:53,919 rules. Thank you. 394 00:17:52,240 --> 00:17:56,559 » Thank you, Jill. Is there any more 395 00:17:53,919 --> 00:17:57,919 comment in the room? Seeing none, is 396 00:17:56,559 --> 00:17:59,280 there any comment online? 397 00:17:57,919 --> 00:18:00,880 » There are no hands raised. 398 00:17:59,280 --> 00:18:03,200 » Great. In that case, we'll move on to 399 00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:07,000 3C, which is our police chief report. 400 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:07,000 Jason, good evening. 401 00:18:14,400 --> 00:18:18,200 Just one second, please. 402 00:18:19,039 --> 00:18:22,039 Ready? 403 00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:30,960 Thank you. Good evening, Mayor 404 00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:32,320 Wilkinson, council members. Tonight, I 405 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:34,320 am pleased to present the police 406 00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:37,320 department second quarter report for 407 00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:37,320 2026. 408 00:18:37,679 --> 00:18:41,760 During this quarter, the department 409 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:44,480 handled 819 410 00:18:41,760 --> 00:18:46,000 incidents, which included zero part one 411 00:18:44,480 --> 00:18:49,360 offense 412 00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:52,799 and four part two offenses. The 413 00:18:49,360 --> 00:18:55,520 remaining 815 incidents were classified 414 00:18:52,799 --> 00:18:58,080 as all other incidents. 415 00:18:55,520 --> 00:19:00,799 Also during this quarter, the department 416 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:02,960 conducted 33 traffic stops, made one 417 00:19:00,799 --> 00:19:05,200 arrest, referred one case for 418 00:19:02,960 --> 00:19:08,080 prosecution, and assisted Tibrron Police 419 00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:10,720 Department on two occasions. 420 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:13,840 During this quarter, we also updated 27 421 00:19:10,720 --> 00:19:16,640 flexible policies in alignment with best 422 00:19:13,840 --> 00:19:19,280 practices or legislative updates. And 423 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:20,960 these updates are detailed in the staff 424 00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:24,000 report. 425 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:27,039 And regarding our RIPA data, officers 426 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:29,760 detained 35 individuals stemming from 33 427 00:19:27,039 --> 00:19:33,280 traffic violations, one suspicious 428 00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:34,960 activity, and one court order violation. 429 00:19:33,280 --> 00:19:37,600 The perceived racial compositions 430 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:40,960 consist of 26 Caucasians, seven 431 00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:44,480 Hispanics, one Asian, and one black. Of 432 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:47,120 these 35 contacts, 33 were officer 433 00:19:44,480 --> 00:19:50,480 initiated while two were related to 434 00:19:47,120 --> 00:19:53,520 calls for service. In all, BPD issued 435 00:19:50,480 --> 00:19:58,799 seven citations, gave 26 warnings, made 436 00:19:53,520 --> 00:20:01,200 one arrest, and one a no action taken. 437 00:19:58,799 --> 00:20:03,760 » During this quarter, PD personnel also 438 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:05,520 attended inerson or online training that 439 00:20:03,760 --> 00:20:07,760 were either mandated or for knowledge 440 00:20:05,520 --> 00:20:09,679 and skill enhancements. 441 00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:11,600 And lastly, as part of our community 442 00:20:09,679 --> 00:20:13,200 policing, we always take great pride and 443 00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:16,080 joy in participating in community 444 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:18,080 events. And al just want to update, 445 00:20:16,080 --> 00:20:20,240 unrelated to our quarterly report 446 00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:23,120 updates, uh the PD is currently working 447 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:25,039 with HR on the open announcement to fill 448 00:20:23,120 --> 00:20:27,360 the three-year term police officer 449 00:20:25,039 --> 00:20:29,280 position along with reserve officers 450 00:20:27,360 --> 00:20:30,799 positions. And with that, I'm available 451 00:20:29,280 --> 00:20:32,640 for questions. 452 00:20:30,799 --> 00:20:35,200 » Thank you, Chief W. Does any council 453 00:20:32,640 --> 00:20:36,880 member have a question? 454 00:20:35,200 --> 00:20:39,280 » Thank you, Chief. I appreciate that 455 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:42,000 update. On your previous slide, you 456 00:20:39,280 --> 00:20:44,000 mentioned uh assist Tibberon officers 457 00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:46,080 who are two for this quarter. Do you 458 00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:48,159 have the reciprocal reverse of that? How 459 00:20:46,080 --> 00:20:50,080 many times did Tibon assist us? 460 00:20:48,159 --> 00:20:51,840 » Um, no. I have not been tracking those. 461 00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:52,880 However, I could start tracking those. 462 00:20:51,840 --> 00:20:54,880 » I'd just be curious. It' be interesting 463 00:20:52,880 --> 00:20:56,000 to see, you know, on a reciprocal basis 464 00:20:54,880 --> 00:20:59,000 how that works. Thank you. 465 00:20:56,000 --> 00:20:59,000 » Okay. 466 00:20:59,039 --> 00:21:04,080 » Any other questions? 467 00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:06,400 Seeing none, um Jason just like to 468 00:21:04,080 --> 00:21:08,559 comment again that um the increased 469 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:10,640 patrols around the community are very 470 00:21:08,559 --> 00:21:12,320 much appreciated by many people in the 471 00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:13,600 community. So, thank you very much for 472 00:21:12,320 --> 00:21:14,960 um for organizing that. 473 00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:17,200 » Thank you for your kind words. 474 00:21:14,960 --> 00:21:18,880 » Um okay, let's open to public comment in 475 00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:20,880 the room. 476 00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:21,840 Seeing none, do we have anything online? 477 00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:23,520 » There are no hands raised. 478 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:25,440 » Okay, great. Okay, we'll now move to 479 00:21:23,520 --> 00:21:27,679 item 3D, which I think most people in 480 00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:29,520 this room are here for. So, sorry to 481 00:21:27,679 --> 00:21:31,200 keep you waiting this long. Um, this is 482 00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:33,280 for the swearing and ceremony for the 483 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:35,039 promotion of police officer Katie Cullen 484 00:21:33,280 --> 00:21:35,919 to sergeant. So, I think this is for 485 00:21:35,039 --> 00:21:37,760 you, Jason. 486 00:21:35,919 --> 00:21:40,400 » Thank you very much. Honorable Mayor 487 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:42,799 Wilkinson, council members, and 488 00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:45,360 distinguished guests. We are here 489 00:21:42,799 --> 00:21:48,159 tonight to celebrate a major milestone 490 00:21:45,360 --> 00:21:49,840 for our department and our city. We are 491 00:21:48,159 --> 00:21:52,159 not only swearing in a new police 492 00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:54,400 sergeant, but we are also swearing in 493 00:21:52,159 --> 00:21:55,679 the first ever female police sergeant in 494 00:21:54,400 --> 00:21:58,679 the history of the Belair Police 495 00:21:55,679 --> 00:21:58,679 Department. 496 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:11,360 It is with great pleasure that I present 497 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:13,360 Katie Colin to the city council and the 498 00:22:11,360 --> 00:22:16,240 community as Belvadier's newest 499 00:22:13,360 --> 00:22:17,919 sergeant. Before I continue, I'd like to 500 00:22:16,240 --> 00:22:21,360 acknowledge the presence of Katie's 501 00:22:17,919 --> 00:22:24,559 parents, Captain Tom Colin, and Mary, 502 00:22:21,360 --> 00:22:27,280 siblings, Theres, Kelly, and Brian, 503 00:22:24,559 --> 00:22:28,960 Tibrron, Fire Captain Mark Fitzgerald, 504 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:31,760 and other very close friends from 505 00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:35,440 Belvadier PD, Sheriff's Office, Mil 506 00:22:31,760 --> 00:22:39,200 Valley PD, and Tibrron PD, including her 507 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:41,200 boyfriend, Patrick Kerslake, who will do 508 00:22:39,200 --> 00:22:43,120 the honor of pinning Sergeant Cullen's 509 00:22:41,200 --> 00:22:44,960 new badge. 510 00:22:43,120 --> 00:22:46,480 Katie began her law enforcement career 511 00:22:44,960 --> 00:22:49,520 with the Marin County Sheriff's Office 512 00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:52,159 in 2016 where she served as a deputy and 513 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:55,600 a hostage negotiator. 514 00:22:52,159 --> 00:22:57,360 Since 2019, Katie expressed her interest 515 00:22:55,600 --> 00:23:00,400 in being part of the Belvadier Police 516 00:22:57,360 --> 00:23:03,360 Department. She was eventually appointed 517 00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:05,120 as a Belvadier police officer in May of 518 00:23:03,360 --> 00:23:07,280 2022. 519 00:23:05,120 --> 00:23:09,520 Since coming on, she has served as 520 00:23:07,280 --> 00:23:12,159 patrol officer, vehicle maintenance 521 00:23:09,520 --> 00:23:14,159 officer, certified crisis intervention 522 00:23:12,159 --> 00:23:16,159 officer, and field training officer, 523 00:23:14,159 --> 00:23:17,760 where she hoped to shape the next 524 00:23:16,159 --> 00:23:20,720 generation of officers for the 525 00:23:17,760 --> 00:23:22,400 department. In her new role, I have no 526 00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:23,840 doubt that Katie will represent the 527 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:26,320 future of the department through her 528 00:23:23,840 --> 00:23:29,280 dedication to membership, mentorship, 529 00:23:26,320 --> 00:23:31,600 and training, commitment to community 530 00:23:29,280 --> 00:23:33,840 caretaking, and her desire for 531 00:23:31,600 --> 00:23:36,320 betterment of the community and the 532 00:23:33,840 --> 00:23:39,360 police department. 533 00:23:36,320 --> 00:23:41,520 One of the greatest honors for a police 534 00:23:39,360 --> 00:23:44,080 chief is the promotion of a highly 535 00:23:41,520 --> 00:23:45,679 qualified member within the department. 536 00:23:44,080 --> 00:23:47,840 And with that said, I would like to 537 00:23:45,679 --> 00:23:51,640 bring up Sergeant Colin and Patrick to 538 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:51,640 take the oath of office. 539 00:24:01,360 --> 00:24:07,000 » Can I ask who our youngest audience 540 00:24:03,440 --> 00:24:07,000 member is here? 541 00:24:22,960 --> 00:24:29,360 do so. 542 00:24:25,440 --> 00:24:32,720 the will of the 543 00:24:29,360 --> 00:24:34,320 » Constitution of the United States 544 00:24:32,720 --> 00:24:37,279 » And the Constitution of the State of 545 00:24:34,320 --> 00:24:39,440 California 546 00:24:37,279 --> 00:24:42,400 » Against all enemies, foreign and 547 00:24:39,440 --> 00:24:44,880 domestic allies 548 00:24:42,400 --> 00:24:47,880 » That I will bear truth, faith, and 549 00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:47,880 allegiance 550 00:24:49,600 --> 00:24:53,200 » To the Constitution of the United States 551 00:24:51,840 --> 00:24:56,400 » The United States 552 00:24:53,200 --> 00:24:56,400 » And the Constitution of 553 00:24:57,039 --> 00:25:05,200 that I take this obligation freely 554 00:25:01,039 --> 00:25:08,240 » Without any mental reservation 555 00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:10,400 » Or purpose of evasion 556 00:25:08,240 --> 00:25:13,400 » And that I will well and faithfully 557 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:13,400 discharge 558 00:25:13,679 --> 00:25:18,760 » The duties upon which I'm about to 559 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:18,760 enter. 560 00:25:50,960 --> 00:25:53,960 Yes. 561 00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:06,200 Yeah. 562 00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:18,400 and staff is available for any 563 00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:20,640 questions. 564 00:26:18,400 --> 00:26:23,279 » Do we open this for Do we open this for 565 00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:24,720 public comment or not? 566 00:26:23,279 --> 00:26:27,840 » Yes. Okay, we'll see if there's any 567 00:26:24,720 --> 00:26:29,600 public comment in the room. 568 00:26:27,840 --> 00:26:30,400 » Seeing none. Is there any online? 569 00:26:29,600 --> 00:26:32,640 » I see none. 570 00:26:30,400 --> 00:26:34,640 » Okay, great. Congratulations, Katie. And 571 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:38,000 I think you are all free to go and have 572 00:26:34,640 --> 00:26:41,159 your beer or whatever it is next. 573 00:26:38,000 --> 00:26:41,159 » Thank you. 574 00:27:10,640 --> 00:27:13,799 That's right. 575 00:27:25,520 --> 00:27:30,640 Okay, we will move on to item 3E which 576 00:27:28,320 --> 00:27:32,880 is an update on the beachro seaw wall 577 00:27:30,640 --> 00:27:34,799 stabilization project. Tony, I guess 578 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:37,279 this this is from you. Okay, great. Go 579 00:27:34,799 --> 00:27:38,799 ahead. 580 00:27:37,279 --> 00:27:41,760 » Thank you, mayor, and good evening 581 00:27:38,799 --> 00:27:43,679 council members. As you are aware, the 582 00:27:41,760 --> 00:27:45,520 beach road stabilization project has 583 00:27:43,679 --> 00:27:47,840 been in the works for some time now and 584 00:27:45,520 --> 00:27:50,960 is planned to move forward in the next 585 00:27:47,840 --> 00:27:53,360 few weeks. Despite a late potential 586 00:27:50,960 --> 00:27:55,919 stumbling block, the oversight committee 587 00:27:53,360 --> 00:27:58,320 has met three times in person in 588 00:27:55,919 --> 00:28:00,480 February, March, and May, and staff 589 00:27:58,320 --> 00:28:03,760 provided an update by memorandum to the 590 00:28:00,480 --> 00:28:05,840 committee in June. City council approved 591 00:28:03,760 --> 00:28:08,159 the award of the construction project uh 592 00:28:05,840 --> 00:28:11,039 construction contract to Gordon N. ball 593 00:28:08,159 --> 00:28:12,799 construction in April and at that time 594 00:28:11,039 --> 00:28:15,760 the outstanding milestones for the 595 00:28:12,799 --> 00:28:17,520 project were temporary construction 596 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:19,039 easements from the property owners of 597 00:28:17,520 --> 00:28:22,000 the three buildings over the water on 598 00:28:19,039 --> 00:28:25,200 Beach Road, environmental permits from 599 00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:27,600 the Army Corps of Engineers and BCDC 600 00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:29,600 and PG& schedule of work for completing 601 00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:31,600 their utility modifications in the 602 00:28:29,600 --> 00:28:34,960 roadway which are necessary before the 603 00:28:31,600 --> 00:28:36,480 sheet pile wall can be installed. 604 00:28:34,960 --> 00:28:38,399 In addition, staff were working with 605 00:28:36,480 --> 00:28:40,559 Hadley Construction to determine how 606 00:28:38,399 --> 00:28:42,159 best to address the three gangways and 607 00:28:40,559 --> 00:28:44,320 utilities at the buildings over the 608 00:28:42,159 --> 00:28:46,000 water which were required to be removed 609 00:28:44,320 --> 00:28:47,520 and replaced for the sheet pile 610 00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:49,679 installation. 611 00:28:47,520 --> 00:28:51,760 This aspect of the project has proved to 612 00:28:49,679 --> 00:28:54,320 be a complicated coordination of 613 00:28:51,760 --> 00:28:56,720 carpentry and different utility services 614 00:28:54,320 --> 00:28:58,480 both private and public and the cost 615 00:28:56,720 --> 00:29:00,720 estimates from Hadley continued to 616 00:28:58,480 --> 00:29:03,840 change as they grappled with the details 617 00:29:00,720 --> 00:29:06,720 and scope of the work. Because of this, 618 00:29:03,840 --> 00:29:08,480 the engineering team changed tack on how 619 00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:11,039 to approach this element of the project 620 00:29:08,480 --> 00:29:13,600 and landed on a solution which utilizes 621 00:29:11,039 --> 00:29:15,760 soil injection of permeation grout 622 00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:18,320 behind the seaw wall at each gangway 623 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:20,080 entrance. This will allow the gangways 624 00:29:18,320 --> 00:29:22,559 and utilities to remain in place for the 625 00:29:20,080 --> 00:29:24,960 duration of construction resulting in 626 00:29:22,559 --> 00:29:26,640 far fewer utility disruptions for the 627 00:29:24,960 --> 00:29:28,399 residents. 628 00:29:26,640 --> 00:29:30,559 The actual costs of this method have 629 00:29:28,399 --> 00:29:32,960 been difficult to quantify as exact 630 00:29:30,559 --> 00:29:34,799 quantities of permeating grout to be 631 00:29:32,960 --> 00:29:36,960 used are unknown. However, the 632 00:29:34,799 --> 00:29:38,720 contractor's estimates put the costs in 633 00:29:36,960 --> 00:29:41,360 the same ballpark as the Hadley's 634 00:29:38,720 --> 00:29:43,039 estimates which are within budget. 635 00:29:41,360 --> 00:29:44,880 Although a small portion of the budgeted 636 00:29:43,039 --> 00:29:47,120 construction contingency may be 637 00:29:44,880 --> 00:29:49,440 required. 638 00:29:47,120 --> 00:29:51,440 Returning to the project at large, the 639 00:29:49,440 --> 00:29:53,039 easement agreements have been signed and 640 00:29:51,440 --> 00:29:55,200 the environmental permits are now in 641 00:29:53,039 --> 00:29:57,279 hand and staff has held a meeting with 642 00:29:55,200 --> 00:30:00,159 the most impacted residents in the homes 643 00:29:57,279 --> 00:30:01,760 over the water. A notification letter to 644 00:30:00,159 --> 00:30:04,399 residents informing them of the traffic 645 00:30:01,760 --> 00:30:07,440 and parking parking impacts was due to 646 00:30:04,399 --> 00:30:10,000 be mailed last week. However, a change 647 00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:12,240 in PG&'s schedule emailed to the city 648 00:30:10,000 --> 00:30:13,760 last Wednesday pause the project 649 00:30:12,240 --> 00:30:15,679 schedule. 650 00:30:13,760 --> 00:30:18,799 P Geni informed the city that their crew 651 00:30:15,679 --> 00:30:21,840 was delayed by 3 weeks and instead of 652 00:30:18,799 --> 00:30:24,399 starting work on the 13th of July today, 653 00:30:21,840 --> 00:30:26,720 they could only start on August the 3rd 654 00:30:24,399 --> 00:30:30,000 with an anticipation an anticipated 655 00:30:26,720 --> 00:30:32,240 completion date of August the 14th. 656 00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:34,720 This would have pushed the Gordon Ball 657 00:30:32,240 --> 00:30:37,520 uh the Gordon Nball schedule beyond the 658 00:30:34,720 --> 00:30:39,440 October 30th deadline. 659 00:30:37,520 --> 00:30:41,200 The city escalated its communications 660 00:30:39,440 --> 00:30:43,600 with PG& 661 00:30:41,200 --> 00:30:45,360 and today they informed staff that they 662 00:30:43,600 --> 00:30:48,559 will be starting sooner than the August 663 00:30:45,360 --> 00:30:51,440 3rd date, possibly on July 20th and even 664 00:30:48,559 --> 00:30:53,440 possibly later this week. 665 00:30:51,440 --> 00:30:55,919 Staff met with Gordon and Ball today to 666 00:30:53,440 --> 00:30:57,919 share the PG update. They will be 667 00:30:55,919 --> 00:30:59,760 meeting with PG later this week to 668 00:30:57,919 --> 00:31:02,080 discuss whether an overlap in work 669 00:30:59,760 --> 00:31:03,679 schedules will be possible and they've 670 00:31:02,080 --> 00:31:06,080 expressed willingness to coordinate with 671 00:31:03,679 --> 00:31:08,000 PG&E to keep the beach road project on 672 00:31:06,080 --> 00:31:09,919 schedule. 673 00:31:08,000 --> 00:31:13,279 If there is no option but to delay their 674 00:31:09,919 --> 00:31:15,679 start to the August uh to until August 675 00:31:13,279 --> 00:31:18,159 3rd, Gordon and Ball will have exactly 676 00:31:15,679 --> 00:31:20,320 64 work days until October 30th to 677 00:31:18,159 --> 00:31:23,360 complete their work. one less than the 678 00:31:20,320 --> 00:31:28,159 scheduled 65, but a much more manageable 679 00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:30,080 schedule change than two full weeks. 680 00:31:28,159 --> 00:31:31,919 Finally, staff are aware that a project 681 00:31:30,080 --> 00:31:34,159 that lasts for 3 months will have 682 00:31:31,919 --> 00:31:35,840 impacts on residents, not just in the 683 00:31:34,159 --> 00:31:38,320 vicinity of the project, but across the 684 00:31:35,840 --> 00:31:39,919 city. Staff will continue to work with 685 00:31:38,320 --> 00:31:42,240 the oversight committee on project 686 00:31:39,919 --> 00:31:43,840 progress. Along with staff, the 687 00:31:42,240 --> 00:31:45,919 construction management team of FA 688 00:31:43,840 --> 00:31:47,840 Engineering will have Adrien Cormier on 689 00:31:45,919 --> 00:31:49,760 the ground to interface with residents 690 00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:52,159 on any questions or concerns they may 691 00:31:49,760 --> 00:31:54,000 have. A web page on the city website 692 00:31:52,159 --> 00:31:56,320 will go live this week and will provide 693 00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:57,919 information and updates. And an item 694 00:31:56,320 --> 00:31:59,519 will be included in the Bvidia Breeze 695 00:31:57,919 --> 00:32:01,919 this week and likely in the coming 696 00:31:59,519 --> 00:32:04,720 months to share information and updates 697 00:32:01,919 --> 00:32:06,960 on this critical infrastructure project. 698 00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:09,120 And with that, I will be happy to take 699 00:32:06,960 --> 00:32:11,519 any questions. 700 00:32:09,120 --> 00:32:13,840 Any 701 00:32:11,519 --> 00:32:16,080 questions for Tony? 702 00:32:13,840 --> 00:32:18,320 » Just real quick, uh you mentioned the uh 703 00:32:16,080 --> 00:32:20,799 the breeze as well as the traffic and 704 00:32:18,320 --> 00:32:22,720 impacts letter to the neighbors. Um 705 00:32:20,799 --> 00:32:24,480 don't don't lowball that would be would 706 00:32:22,720 --> 00:32:26,559 be my suggestion. Like you know, you 707 00:32:24,480 --> 00:32:28,480 know, really let people know what it is. 708 00:32:26,559 --> 00:32:30,399 I don't know if you want to, you know, a 709 00:32:28,480 --> 00:32:32,720 single topic blast, but but but 710 00:32:30,399 --> 00:32:34,159 certainly something I would I would get 711 00:32:32,720 --> 00:32:36,640 that information out there what people 712 00:32:34,159 --> 00:32:37,840 to expect as far as any traffic 713 00:32:36,640 --> 00:32:39,279 disruptions. There's always going to be 714 00:32:37,840 --> 00:32:41,440 parking disruptions and some traffic 715 00:32:39,279 --> 00:32:42,960 disruptions during during the times, but 716 00:32:41,440 --> 00:32:45,919 be clear and explicit about that so 717 00:32:42,960 --> 00:32:50,159 people know what what to expect. 718 00:32:45,919 --> 00:32:51,760 » Yeah, absolutely. And and um the letter 719 00:32:50,159 --> 00:32:54,080 the not notification letter that we're 720 00:32:51,760 --> 00:32:57,200 sending as well u includes a QR code 721 00:32:54,080 --> 00:32:59,919 that will let people um uh go straight 722 00:32:57,200 --> 00:33:01,760 to the web page on on the on the website 723 00:32:59,919 --> 00:33:02,399 which will have a lot more information 724 00:33:01,760 --> 00:33:05,120 available. 725 00:33:02,399 --> 00:33:06,720 » What's the radius of that though? Um 726 00:33:05,120 --> 00:33:09,279 well we we were discussing that this 727 00:33:06,720 --> 00:33:11,760 this week um 728 00:33:09,279 --> 00:33:13,919 uh because the reason because it's 729 00:33:11,760 --> 00:33:17,360 actually quite difficult to draw a line 730 00:33:13,919 --> 00:33:20,080 around uh where sort of uh impacted 731 00:33:17,360 --> 00:33:22,480 residents uh but not uh too impacted 732 00:33:20,080 --> 00:33:24,240 where that might be. So um at this point 733 00:33:22,480 --> 00:33:25,519 we're looking at a citywide um 734 00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:25,919 notification letter. 735 00:33:25,519 --> 00:33:28,320 » Okay. 736 00:33:25,919 --> 00:33:30,240 » Yeah. 737 00:33:28,320 --> 00:33:32,880 I I would support the citywide 738 00:33:30,240 --> 00:33:34,480 notification letter just because no 739 00:33:32,880 --> 00:33:36,960 matter where you live, you drive down 740 00:33:34,480 --> 00:33:40,159 Beach Road at some point and sometimes 741 00:33:36,960 --> 00:33:42,880 other people do use it more 742 00:33:40,159 --> 00:33:45,840 really no matter where you live. So, um 743 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:48,159 at some point everybody hits beach road 744 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:50,480 often during the week. So, it's probably 745 00:33:48,159 --> 00:33:53,519 a good idea at least for that initial 746 00:33:50,480 --> 00:33:56,480 one that everybody knows. 747 00:33:53,519 --> 00:33:59,279 » Yeah. Um yeah, definitely agree. 748 00:33:56,480 --> 00:34:02,080 » But that was great news. I was expecting 749 00:33:59,279 --> 00:34:04,720 lots of horrible news from you. So, you 750 00:34:02,080 --> 00:34:07,279 started out with this depressing news, 751 00:34:04,720 --> 00:34:10,720 but you turned it around. So, about the 752 00:34:07,279 --> 00:34:14,159 the walkways was great to hear. The PG& 753 00:34:10,720 --> 00:34:16,879 responded to the city's requests. This 754 00:34:14,159 --> 00:34:19,919 was great to hear. So, let's hope they 755 00:34:16,879 --> 00:34:22,159 do what they promise. 756 00:34:19,919 --> 00:34:23,839 » And Tony, thank you for that report. Um, 757 00:34:22,159 --> 00:34:25,919 I did have one question as I was 758 00:34:23,839 --> 00:34:28,639 listening to you 759 00:34:25,919 --> 00:34:32,000 when you talked about that, um, they 760 00:34:28,639 --> 00:34:35,200 would be able to have hopefully 64 days 761 00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:39,520 to finish the project. If you get into 762 00:34:35,200 --> 00:34:41,599 that position where things, days, and 763 00:34:39,520 --> 00:34:45,119 everything start really counting, would 764 00:34:41,599 --> 00:34:47,280 the city consider um looking at our 765 00:34:45,119 --> 00:34:49,200 normal construction hours and maybe 766 00:34:47,280 --> 00:34:52,399 allowing construction to start a little 767 00:34:49,200 --> 00:34:55,599 bit earlier or even consider I know the 768 00:34:52,399 --> 00:34:59,760 third rail of working on weekends if 769 00:34:55,599 --> 00:35:01,920 really got pushed into it um just so 770 00:34:59,760 --> 00:35:03,599 that we could meet the the deadline as 771 00:35:01,920 --> 00:35:06,000 sort of an absolute outside 772 00:35:03,599 --> 00:35:07,520 consideration. 773 00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:10,320 Yes, I think that is definitely 774 00:35:07,520 --> 00:35:14,000 something that that we would look at. Um 775 00:35:10,320 --> 00:35:16,240 and um hopefully we wouldn't have to um 776 00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:19,119 deal with it, but um that that would be 777 00:35:16,240 --> 00:35:20,240 one way to uh give them a little extra 778 00:35:19,119 --> 00:35:21,359 time. 779 00:35:20,240 --> 00:35:23,520 » Okay, great. Thank you. 780 00:35:21,359 --> 00:35:25,440 » And the 65 days was was the full scope 781 00:35:23,520 --> 00:35:27,280 of the work. Um that's not necessarily 782 00:35:25,440 --> 00:35:29,520 the inwater work. And so hopefully they 783 00:35:27,280 --> 00:35:30,960 can skew that to the earlier part of the 784 00:35:29,520 --> 00:35:33,200 project. I know they can't do it 785 00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:35,359 exclusively, but 786 00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:38,160 some flexibility there, that's for sure. 787 00:35:35,359 --> 00:35:42,160 » Yes. Yeah. And um actually a little less 788 00:35:38,160 --> 00:35:44,880 flexibility than I um had um expected. 789 00:35:42,160 --> 00:35:46,800 Um yeah, basically they've they've sort 790 00:35:44,880 --> 00:35:50,000 of organized a very efficient sequence 791 00:35:46,800 --> 00:35:52,480 of work. Um and the last item is to cut 792 00:35:50,000 --> 00:35:55,119 the sheet piles down to size uh along 793 00:35:52,480 --> 00:35:57,839 the seaw wall, which is 794 00:35:55,119 --> 00:35:59,839 » Yeah. in the beach. Um and that's after 795 00:35:57,839 --> 00:36:01,599 cuz there's a concrete a layer of 796 00:35:59,839 --> 00:36:03,680 concrete that needs to set and cure for 797 00:36:01,599 --> 00:36:04,960 seven days before that. And um so they 798 00:36:03,680 --> 00:36:06,880 have to wait for that before they can 799 00:36:04,960 --> 00:36:08,400 cut it. And yeah, 800 00:36:06,880 --> 00:36:10,480 » Just one final quick comment. The 801 00:36:08,400 --> 00:36:12,320 escalation that that that um Tony is 802 00:36:10,480 --> 00:36:14,880 referring to is is some work by our 803 00:36:12,320 --> 00:36:17,359 mayor. So thank you. Thank you on that. 804 00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:20,720 » You're welcome. Um I have a couple of 805 00:36:17,359 --> 00:36:22,560 questions. So the P during the PG& work 806 00:36:20,720 --> 00:36:24,720 will there be road closures during that 807 00:36:22,560 --> 00:36:27,359 time as well or this will only and the 808 00:36:24,720 --> 00:36:28,960 other utility work the road 809 00:36:27,359 --> 00:36:30,560 complications will only happen when the 810 00:36:28,960 --> 00:36:33,040 actual project begins. 811 00:36:30,560 --> 00:36:35,119 » There will there will be traffic control 812 00:36:33,040 --> 00:36:37,599 uh traffic controls in place for PG&'s 813 00:36:35,119 --> 00:36:41,200 work. They haven't um submitted any 814 00:36:37,599 --> 00:36:44,640 plans for road closures or or any um uh 815 00:36:41,200 --> 00:36:46,240 permit requests. Um, so we're 816 00:36:44,640 --> 00:36:47,839 anticipating that the road will remain 817 00:36:46,240 --> 00:36:49,359 open, but uh there will be traffic 818 00:36:47,839 --> 00:36:51,200 controls in place. And actually this 819 00:36:49,359 --> 00:36:54,000 evening on my way up here, I saw that 820 00:36:51,200 --> 00:36:57,200 they've put no parking signs um up along 821 00:36:54,000 --> 00:37:00,720 Beach Road. Um so they're um it looks 822 00:36:57,200 --> 00:37:02,240 like they are um hoping to start sooner 823 00:37:00,720 --> 00:37:04,480 rather than later. 824 00:37:02,240 --> 00:37:06,480 » Okay. Do we have you know how Tibbron 825 00:37:04,480 --> 00:37:08,079 has one of those boards that can give 826 00:37:06,480 --> 00:37:10,560 information? Do we have one of those 827 00:37:08,079 --> 00:37:14,000 where we can at least 828 00:37:10,560 --> 00:37:15,520 flag direction to where wherever to to 829 00:37:14,000 --> 00:37:18,320 get more information? 830 00:37:15,520 --> 00:37:20,560 » Um, we we don't have one of those, but 831 00:37:18,320 --> 00:37:22,320 we actually included it in in the RFP 832 00:37:20,560 --> 00:37:28,079 documents for the contractor to provide 833 00:37:22,320 --> 00:37:29,760 one. Um, and so um um we met with them 834 00:37:28,079 --> 00:37:31,119 today and that was one of the things 835 00:37:29,760 --> 00:37:32,880 that they brought up was that they have 836 00:37:31,119 --> 00:37:35,359 it and um they're ready to bring it out. 837 00:37:32,880 --> 00:37:38,560 So that'll probably be placed next week. 838 00:37:35,359 --> 00:37:40,320 Um, and those signs are quite um there's 839 00:37:38,560 --> 00:37:43,599 actually not much information you can 840 00:37:40,320 --> 00:37:45,680 get on them, but um it's a good point. 841 00:37:43,599 --> 00:37:47,440 We could refer people to the website for 842 00:37:45,680 --> 00:37:48,880 uh for for more details, 843 00:37:47,440 --> 00:37:50,480 » Right? And I agree with everybody else 844 00:37:48,880 --> 00:37:53,839 here. The more communication and the 845 00:37:50,480 --> 00:37:55,520 earlier we and comprehensively we can do 846 00:37:53,839 --> 00:37:56,800 it to everybody in the community, I 847 00:37:55,520 --> 00:37:59,520 think that's super important so that 848 00:37:56,800 --> 00:38:01,280 people aren't caught out. 849 00:37:59,520 --> 00:38:04,000 » Thank you. Yeah, definitely. 850 00:38:01,280 --> 00:38:05,520 » Okay. Um, if there are no more 851 00:38:04,000 --> 00:38:08,240 questions, we'll open it to public 852 00:38:05,520 --> 00:38:10,400 comment. Seeing none in the room, is 853 00:38:08,240 --> 00:38:13,359 there any online? 854 00:38:10,400 --> 00:38:15,839 » Okay, great. In that case, we will 855 00:38:13,359 --> 00:38:19,280 close item 3E and we're going to move on 856 00:38:15,839 --> 00:38:20,960 to the consent calendar. The consent 857 00:38:19,280 --> 00:38:22,880 calendar consists of items that the city 858 00:38:20,960 --> 00:38:24,640 council considers to be routine or 859 00:38:22,880 --> 00:38:26,720 council has discussed previously and do 860 00:38:24,640 --> 00:38:28,720 not require further discussion. Unless 861 00:38:26,720 --> 00:38:30,480 any item is specifically removed by any 862 00:38:28,720 --> 00:38:32,800 member of the city council, the consent 863 00:38:30,480 --> 00:38:34,720 calendar will be adopted by one motion. 864 00:38:32,800 --> 00:38:36,640 Council will take public comment on all 865 00:38:34,720 --> 00:38:39,680 items on the consent calendar when the 866 00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:41,280 calendar is called. So, can I first ask 867 00:38:39,680 --> 00:38:43,119 my colleagues whether anybody wishes to 868 00:38:41,280 --> 00:38:46,440 have any item uh removed from the 869 00:38:43,119 --> 00:38:46,440 consent calendar? 870 00:38:48,880 --> 00:38:53,760 I don't know if I need it removed, but I 871 00:38:50,880 --> 00:38:57,599 have one question about B, one question 872 00:38:53,760 --> 00:39:01,040 about C, and one question about D. 873 00:38:57,599 --> 00:39:05,400 » Okay. Anybody else? 874 00:39:01,040 --> 00:39:05,400 » B, C, and D. She said B, C, and D. 875 00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:09,680 » Did you say B? 876 00:39:08,320 --> 00:39:12,320 » B, C, and D. 877 00:39:09,680 --> 00:39:13,520 » Oh, E. Okay, that was my question. 878 00:39:12,320 --> 00:39:16,160 » Okay. 879 00:39:13,520 --> 00:39:17,440 » Okay. Okay. So rather than pull these um 880 00:39:16,160 --> 00:39:18,480 under I can just ask the questions 881 00:39:17,440 --> 00:39:19,920 directly 882 00:39:18,480 --> 00:39:20,640 » Or ask Jane to ask her questions 883 00:39:19,920 --> 00:39:22,640 directly. 884 00:39:20,640 --> 00:39:23,839 » Yes. Let's see how simple or complicated 885 00:39:22,640 --> 00:39:24,560 the questions are if you don't mind. 886 00:39:23,839 --> 00:39:26,960 Mayor. 887 00:39:24,560 --> 00:39:29,440 » Okay. And and if it can't be answered 888 00:39:26,960 --> 00:39:32,240 now, this question could be answered 889 00:39:29,440 --> 00:39:36,320 another time. It's just that it came up. 890 00:39:32,240 --> 00:39:39,599 Um I was asked um to explain what the 891 00:39:36,320 --> 00:39:41,200 980 work week literally means. And so I 892 00:39:39,599 --> 00:39:43,119 don't know if you can explain that in a 893 00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:44,640 short 894 00:39:43,119 --> 00:39:47,760 » Compact way. 895 00:39:44,640 --> 00:39:49,359 » Yeah. So most staff work the 980 it's 896 00:39:47,760 --> 00:39:51,839 five 897 00:39:49,359 --> 00:39:55,040 five days one week with an eight hour 898 00:39:51,839 --> 00:39:59,040 day on Friday and then on the second 899 00:39:55,040 --> 00:40:01,680 week it's four 9-hour days. So it's a 36 900 00:39:59,040 --> 00:40:04,000 and a 44. 901 00:40:01,680 --> 00:40:05,839 » Okay. 902 00:40:04,000 --> 00:40:07,760 » They're always nine hours except for the 903 00:40:05,839 --> 00:40:12,320 one Friday. 904 00:40:07,760 --> 00:40:14,160 Okay. Four nine hour days. Okay. 905 00:40:12,320 --> 00:40:17,760 » Nour 906 00:40:14,160 --> 00:40:18,960 9 hour days. The second week is four 907 00:40:17,760 --> 00:40:20,720 nines right 908 00:40:18,960 --> 00:40:22,400 » Hours. 909 00:40:20,720 --> 00:40:24,160 I didn't realize that. That's why it's 910 00:40:22,400 --> 00:40:25,119 990. I never knew that. 911 00:40:24,160 --> 00:40:26,160 » Right. 912 00:40:25,119 --> 00:40:26,720 » 980. 913 00:40:26,160 --> 00:40:32,160 » Makes sense. 914 00:40:26,720 --> 00:40:34,320 » Now it helps. Okay. And then um did do 915 00:40:32,160 --> 00:40:35,520 you want Pat to ask her B question? 916 00:40:34,320 --> 00:40:37,359 » Which she's got D. 917 00:40:35,520 --> 00:40:40,960 » Oh D. Okay. Sorry for C. 918 00:40:37,359 --> 00:40:43,760 » Um, then in attachment A under salaries, 919 00:40:40,960 --> 00:40:46,560 just out of curiosity, where would our 920 00:40:43,760 --> 00:40:50,160 new sergeant be placed on that salary 921 00:40:46,560 --> 00:40:52,720 schedule? Do you know that? Where in the 922 00:40:50,160 --> 00:40:56,359 police salary? 923 00:40:52,720 --> 00:40:56,359 » Uh, yes. 924 00:41:12,640 --> 00:41:19,119 I believe she was placed at step C D C. 925 00:41:18,000 --> 00:41:22,640 » Yes. 926 00:41:19,119 --> 00:41:23,200 » In the hired before July 1st, 2026. 927 00:41:22,640 --> 00:41:25,599 » Correct. 928 00:41:23,200 --> 00:41:29,200 » Okay. 929 00:41:25,599 --> 00:41:33,119 Okay. Thanks. And then for D, my 930 00:41:29,200 --> 00:41:35,680 question is, have we really received $80 931 00:41:33,119 --> 00:41:39,640 in 50 years 932 00:41:35,680 --> 00:41:39,640 from that block grant? 933 00:41:40,000 --> 00:41:47,599 There's a block grant in there and it 934 00:41:42,240 --> 00:41:50,400 said we've received $80 in 50 years. 935 00:41:47,599 --> 00:41:52,319 And so my question is, are we required 936 00:41:50,400 --> 00:41:54,720 to be part of that block grant or should 937 00:41:52,319 --> 00:41:58,079 we just I think it costs us more to 938 00:41:54,720 --> 00:41:59,839 produce the paperwork on this. 939 00:41:58,079 --> 00:42:01,680 » So mayor. 940 00:41:59,839 --> 00:42:04,240 Yeah. So mayor, if I may offer 941 00:42:01,680 --> 00:42:08,960 recommendation. Um it sounds like I 942 00:42:04,240 --> 00:42:11,440 think we can proceed with items B and C 943 00:42:08,960 --> 00:42:13,280 and maybe pull D. So Commissioner, 944 00:42:11,440 --> 00:42:16,000 Council Member Carropia can also pose 945 00:42:13,280 --> 00:42:19,200 your question. 946 00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:20,400 was the same question. $80 if that was 947 00:42:19,200 --> 00:42:22,240 » Okay. So you want you will pull that 948 00:42:20,400 --> 00:42:23,680 item and discuss it. Okay. Fine. So in 949 00:42:22,240 --> 00:42:28,000 that case, can I get a motion from 950 00:42:23,680 --> 00:42:31,760 someone to approve items 4 A through 4 C 951 00:42:28,000 --> 00:42:33,280 and 4 E through 4 H. 952 00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:34,079 » So moved. 953 00:42:33,280 --> 00:42:35,520 » Second. 954 00:42:34,079 --> 00:42:36,160 » All in favor? 955 00:42:35,520 --> 00:42:40,400 » I. 956 00:42:36,160 --> 00:42:43,920 » Great. We'll move on to uh to 4 D. So 957 00:42:40,400 --> 00:42:46,800 Oh, I'm sorry. Not awake. Do we have any 958 00:42:43,920 --> 00:42:48,000 public comment on the consent calendar? 959 00:42:46,800 --> 00:42:50,560 » There are no hands raised. 960 00:42:48,000 --> 00:42:53,440 » Okay, thank you. Um, okay. So, moving to 961 00:42:50,560 --> 00:42:54,160 4D. Um, who would like to answer that 962 00:42:53,440 --> 00:42:55,920 question? 963 00:42:54,160 --> 00:42:57,440 » Yes. So, I'd say it's a it's a great 964 00:42:55,920 --> 00:42:59,680 question that and they're referencing 965 00:42:57,440 --> 00:43:01,599 all of Miranda in that statement. It 966 00:42:59,680 --> 00:43:05,119 looks like So, I'm guessing that's 967 00:43:01,599 --> 00:43:08,079 perhaps a typo. We can look into it, but 968 00:43:05,119 --> 00:43:10,079 it's more than more than $80 certainly. 969 00:43:08,079 --> 00:43:11,599 Um, however, is a good question about 970 00:43:10,079 --> 00:43:13,280 how much does Belvadier receive from 971 00:43:11,599 --> 00:43:15,920 that? I think historically not much if 972 00:43:13,280 --> 00:43:19,119 any um just you know given the the 973 00:43:15,920 --> 00:43:20,640 mission of this organization. So uh it's 974 00:43:19,119 --> 00:43:22,319 possible with the housing element and 975 00:43:20,640 --> 00:43:24,400 new housing laws we may end up tapping 976 00:43:22,319 --> 00:43:26,560 into this or being eligible for this as 977 00:43:24,400 --> 00:43:28,960 we get more affordable and affordability 978 00:43:26,560 --> 00:43:31,119 of those types of units in Belvadier. 979 00:43:28,960 --> 00:43:32,400 But um I think it's you know the the 980 00:43:31,119 --> 00:43:34,720 takeaway is it's better to be part of 981 00:43:32,400 --> 00:43:36,640 the program than not um at least going 982 00:43:34,720 --> 00:43:40,920 into where going into this from where we 983 00:43:36,640 --> 00:43:40,920 are with with regard to housing. 984 00:43:41,280 --> 00:43:46,000 Most of the pre of the prerequisites are 985 00:43:43,200 --> 00:43:47,359 are 100% affordable. Like they they 986 00:43:46,000 --> 00:43:48,640 literally have a floor on on 100% 987 00:43:47,359 --> 00:43:50,400 affordability. 988 00:43:48,640 --> 00:43:53,960 » So maybe it was with Farley Place that 989 00:43:50,400 --> 00:43:53,960 we got some money. 990 00:43:54,960 --> 00:43:58,160 » Okay, with that let's open. Does that 991 00:43:56,640 --> 00:43:59,680 sufficiently answer your question? Um 992 00:43:58,160 --> 00:44:01,520 Beth, do we have any public comment on 993 00:43:59,680 --> 00:44:04,319 item 4 D? 994 00:44:01,520 --> 00:44:06,560 » Okay, so can I get a motion for 4D? 995 00:44:04,319 --> 00:44:07,680 » I make a motion to approve 4D on the 996 00:44:06,560 --> 00:44:08,480 consent calendar. 997 00:44:07,680 --> 00:44:10,319 » Second. 998 00:44:08,480 --> 00:44:12,400 » All in favor? I 999 00:44:10,319 --> 00:44:15,359 » Great motion passes. 1000 00:44:12,400 --> 00:44:18,160 » We will now move on to our item five 1001 00:44:15,359 --> 00:44:20,800 which is our public hearings and this is 1002 00:44:18,160 --> 00:44:23,119 uh 5A an introduction and first reading 1003 00:44:20,800 --> 00:44:24,960 of an ordinance amending the Belvadier 1004 00:44:23,119 --> 00:44:27,920 municipal code to establish rules for 1005 00:44:24,960 --> 00:44:31,359 commercial drone delivery in Belvidia. 1006 00:44:27,920 --> 00:44:32,079 Um is Andrew is this you or is this 1007 00:44:31,359 --> 00:44:34,000 Robert? 1008 00:44:32,079 --> 00:44:36,400 » Yeah I'll go ahead and start off. Uh 1009 00:44:34,000 --> 00:44:38,640 thank you mayor. So earlier this year, 1010 00:44:36,400 --> 00:44:40,880 uh, staff began hearing from some 1011 00:44:38,640 --> 00:44:44,400 private industry experts that commercial 1012 00:44:40,880 --> 00:44:46,079 drone deliveries specifically are 1013 00:44:44,400 --> 00:44:48,960 expected to become an increasingly 1014 00:44:46,079 --> 00:44:51,040 common as retailers, restaurants, and 1015 00:44:48,960 --> 00:44:52,800 delivery service providers expand 1016 00:44:51,040 --> 00:44:55,680 operations throughout the San Francisco 1017 00:44:52,800 --> 00:44:57,839 Bay area. Uh rather than responding 1018 00:44:55,680 --> 00:44:59,520 after commercial drone delivery becomes 1019 00:44:57,839 --> 00:45:01,440 established, the proposed ordinance 1020 00:44:59,520 --> 00:45:03,280 takes a proactive approach by 1021 00:45:01,440 --> 00:45:04,960 establishing a local regulatory 1022 00:45:03,280 --> 00:45:07,359 framework that addresses the ground 1023 00:45:04,960 --> 00:45:09,440 level impacts of these operations while 1024 00:45:07,359 --> 00:45:12,079 also recognizing the Federal Aviation 1025 00:45:09,440 --> 00:45:15,520 Administration's ex exclusive authority 1026 00:45:12,079 --> 00:45:17,040 over aircraft operations and airspace. 1027 00:45:15,520 --> 00:45:18,640 Consistent with that division of 1028 00:45:17,040 --> 00:45:20,880 authority, the ordinance does not 1029 00:45:18,640 --> 00:45:24,000 regulate drone overflight uh flight 1030 00:45:20,880 --> 00:45:25,920 paths, altitude or aircraft operations. 1031 00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:28,800 In broad terms, the ordinance does four 1032 00:45:25,920 --> 00:45:31,119 things. Uh first, it regulates where 1033 00:45:28,800 --> 00:45:34,160 commercial drone delivery facilities may 1034 00:45:31,119 --> 00:45:36,319 be located. Second, it establishes rules 1035 00:45:34,160 --> 00:45:38,720 for delivery related activity on both 1036 00:45:36,319 --> 00:45:40,880 public and private property. 1037 00:45:38,720 --> 00:45:44,079 Third, it includes standards to protect 1038 00:45:40,880 --> 00:45:46,000 privacy, minimum nuisance uh minimize 1039 00:45:44,079 --> 00:45:48,480 nuisance impacts, and preserve public 1040 00:45:46,000 --> 00:45:50,400 safety. And finally, it provides the 1041 00:45:48,480 --> 00:45:53,040 city with enforcement tools should 1042 00:45:50,400 --> 00:45:54,720 violations occur. The ordinance is 1043 00:45:53,040 --> 00:45:56,800 intended to ensure that commercial drone 1044 00:45:54,720 --> 00:45:58,480 delivery can occur in a manner that's 1045 00:45:56,800 --> 00:46:01,040 compatible with Belvier's residential 1046 00:45:58,480 --> 00:46:03,119 character, public safety, and quality of 1047 00:46:01,040 --> 00:46:04,720 life. Barring any changes this evening, 1048 00:46:03,119 --> 00:46:06,640 staff is requesting that the city 1049 00:46:04,720 --> 00:46:08,560 council will introduce the ordinance, 1050 00:46:06,640 --> 00:46:11,359 wave a first reading, and direct staff 1051 00:46:08,560 --> 00:46:14,079 to return uh for adoption at the next 1052 00:46:11,359 --> 00:46:15,599 regular city council meeting. Andrew and 1053 00:46:14,079 --> 00:46:18,079 myself are both available if you have 1054 00:46:15,599 --> 00:46:20,880 questions. 1055 00:46:18,079 --> 00:46:21,599 » Do any council members have questions? 1056 00:46:20,880 --> 00:46:24,240 » Kevin, 1057 00:46:21,599 --> 00:46:26,800 » I just had one. is uh in the amendment 1058 00:46:24,240 --> 00:46:28,400 it was uh I think it was 20 more 1059 00:46:26,800 --> 00:46:30,560 deliveries per month shall constitute 1060 00:46:28,400 --> 00:46:32,319 repeated or systematic use of the 1061 00:46:30,560 --> 00:46:35,760 property. I'm just wondering where the 1062 00:46:32,319 --> 00:46:38,800 20 came from. 1063 00:46:35,760 --> 00:46:40,880 Um that was a number that was um 1064 00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:43,200 selected uh in consultation with the 1065 00:46:40,880 --> 00:46:44,880 mayor and certainly that is not a number 1066 00:46:43,200 --> 00:46:46,079 that is set in stone. Uh that is 1067 00:46:44,880 --> 00:46:47,520 something within the council's 1068 00:46:46,079 --> 00:46:48,079 discretion if you want to move it up or 1069 00:46:47,520 --> 00:46:51,359 down. 1070 00:46:48,079 --> 00:46:53,920 » Thank you. Any 1071 00:46:51,359 --> 00:46:57,520 other questions? 1072 00:46:53,920 --> 00:47:04,079 » I have a ton. Okay. 1073 00:46:57,520 --> 00:47:09,640 Sorry. Um so um 1074 00:47:04,079 --> 00:47:09,640 let's see. Let's go to um 1075 00:47:13,119 --> 00:47:20,800 I guess a lot of my questions refer to 1076 00:47:17,760 --> 00:47:25,079 things like um authorized by the city. 1077 00:47:20,800 --> 00:47:25,079 Um so 1078 00:47:25,760 --> 00:47:32,319 it's not clear in this code 1079 00:47:28,960 --> 00:47:35,280 what that vehicle is going to be. um and 1080 00:47:32,319 --> 00:47:37,920 and how we're going to um have 1081 00:47:35,280 --> 00:47:39,280 authorized by city. Is it um going to be 1082 00:47:37,920 --> 00:47:43,520 done with a permit? Is it going to be 1083 00:47:39,280 --> 00:47:48,480 done with a license? Um the same around 1084 00:47:43,520 --> 00:47:52,160 written consent? What's the vehicle? Um 1085 00:47:48,480 --> 00:47:54,480 what are the control measures? Um how do 1086 00:47:52,160 --> 00:47:57,839 we know who has or who has not given 1087 00:47:54,480 --> 00:47:58,880 written um consent? Um is it going to be 1088 00:47:57,839 --> 00:48:00,720 something that's going to be done 1089 00:47:58,880 --> 00:48:05,359 online? I mean, it says we're going to 1090 00:48:00,720 --> 00:48:08,319 be doing this, but um, 1091 00:48:05,359 --> 00:48:10,240 you know, there there there's nothing 1092 00:48:08,319 --> 00:48:13,119 here that says you have to get a permit 1093 00:48:10,240 --> 00:48:15,440 or it's a license. That'll be an online 1094 00:48:13,119 --> 00:48:18,240 registration. I mean, who's going to 1095 00:48:15,440 --> 00:48:21,119 control this online registration of 1096 00:48:18,240 --> 00:48:24,720 who's 1097 00:48:21,119 --> 00:48:27,040 signed up or not? Um, you know, nuisance 1098 00:48:24,720 --> 00:48:30,240 impact on neighbors. 1099 00:48:27,040 --> 00:48:32,880 um you know what might be fine with me 1100 00:48:30,240 --> 00:48:34,880 may not be fine with another and then 1101 00:48:32,880 --> 00:48:38,079 that comes into how do we how do we 1102 00:48:34,880 --> 00:48:41,440 define what the what a nuisance is. I 1103 00:48:38,079 --> 00:48:44,079 mean do we use our noise ordinance but 1104 00:48:41,440 --> 00:48:46,559 then how do we regulate the sound of a 1105 00:48:44,079 --> 00:48:49,359 drone and what what that sound is 1106 00:48:46,559 --> 00:48:53,200 depending on who the delivery vehicle 1107 00:48:49,359 --> 00:48:56,160 is. Um 1108 00:48:53,200 --> 00:48:58,640 um 1109 00:48:56,160 --> 00:49:00,960 and then we're in the future going to 1110 00:48:58,640 --> 00:49:03,920 establish a complaint and um 1111 00:49:00,960 --> 00:49:06,079 investigation process. My questions were 1112 00:49:03,920 --> 00:49:10,720 is when are we going to do that? Who's 1113 00:49:06,079 --> 00:49:12,880 going to be responsible for that? Um 1114 00:49:10,720 --> 00:49:14,960 and then does anybody else have 1115 00:49:12,880 --> 00:49:16,480 questions because I could I then go into 1116 00:49:14,960 --> 00:49:18,400 certain sections. 1117 00:49:16,480 --> 00:49:19,760 » Why don't we because you've listed about 1118 00:49:18,400 --> 00:49:22,319 20 questions. Should we take them one 1119 00:49:19,760 --> 00:49:26,119 one by one? Is that going to be easier? 1120 00:49:22,319 --> 00:49:26,119 » So, um 1121 00:49:29,119 --> 00:49:33,760 is it? 1122 00:49:31,040 --> 00:49:35,920 Oh, so that's where we are. So, in the 1123 00:49:33,760 --> 00:49:37,839 actual staff report in the purpose of 1124 00:49:35,920 --> 00:49:41,200 the ordinance, 1125 00:49:37,839 --> 00:49:43,280 um in number two, um it says required 1126 00:49:41,200 --> 00:49:46,319 conditional per permit for commercial 1127 00:49:43,280 --> 00:49:49,040 drone delivery facility and then it says 1128 00:49:46,319 --> 00:49:51,359 elsewhere in the city. I I I'm not sure 1129 00:49:49,040 --> 00:49:52,640 if elsewhere is the right word or if it 1130 00:49:51,359 --> 00:49:55,200 should have been anywhere. I just 1131 00:49:52,640 --> 00:49:57,119 questioning that. And then in number 1132 00:49:55,200 --> 00:49:59,839 three, 1133 00:49:57,119 --> 00:50:02,319 it talks about um prohibited commercial 1134 00:49:59,839 --> 00:50:06,319 drone uh deliveries and it says 1135 00:50:02,319 --> 00:50:08,480 authorized by the city. 1136 00:50:06,319 --> 00:50:10,480 And so 1137 00:50:08,480 --> 00:50:15,599 » Use permit. 1138 00:50:10,480 --> 00:50:17,760 The question is is should it be um 1139 00:50:15,599 --> 00:50:19,520 should we be you know more more direct 1140 00:50:17,760 --> 00:50:21,200 in that? I was just wondering you know 1141 00:50:19,520 --> 00:50:23,599 what what vehicle are we going to be 1142 00:50:21,200 --> 00:50:27,920 using? Did you want to answer these as I 1143 00:50:23,599 --> 00:50:29,760 go or do you want me to just rattle on? 1144 00:50:27,920 --> 00:50:31,839 » Well, we'll we'll try to tackle a couple 1145 00:50:29,760 --> 00:50:33,839 at a time and we'll see how Okay. 1146 00:50:31,839 --> 00:50:36,000 » So this this but then now we get down to 1147 00:50:33,839 --> 00:50:38,000 Okay. For 1148 00:50:36,000 --> 00:50:42,319 » Um written consent before private 1149 00:50:38,000 --> 00:50:43,520 property is used. So, 1150 00:50:42,319 --> 00:50:45,200 is there going to be an online 1151 00:50:43,520 --> 00:50:47,599 registration? 1152 00:50:45,200 --> 00:50:50,480 Um, how do we control? How do we know 1153 00:50:47,599 --> 00:50:53,359 who's approved, not approved? Um, would 1154 00:50:50,480 --> 00:50:55,200 it be better to do an optin or I mean an 1155 00:50:53,359 --> 00:50:58,720 opt out versus an opt-in because it 1156 00:50:55,200 --> 00:51:01,200 might be lesser people? Um, you know, I 1157 00:50:58,720 --> 00:51:04,079 mean, what how are we going to manage 1158 00:51:01,200 --> 00:51:07,200 this? Um, 1159 00:51:04,079 --> 00:51:08,800 » Yeah. So if I I could take a stab at 1160 00:51:07,200 --> 00:51:09,200 that issue if you don't mind, council 1161 00:51:08,800 --> 00:51:09,839 member. 1162 00:51:09,200 --> 00:51:12,240 » Yeah. Yeah. 1163 00:51:09,839 --> 00:51:13,920 » Yeah. So we didn't in as a first pass, 1164 00:51:12,240 --> 00:51:15,760 we didn't build in a lot of specificity 1165 00:51:13,920 --> 00:51:17,760 how that written authorization is to be 1166 00:51:15,760 --> 00:51:19,280 provided. Uh certainly if the council 1167 00:51:17,760 --> 00:51:21,119 wants to be more specific, we can 1168 00:51:19,280 --> 00:51:22,880 certainly head in that direction. Um but 1169 00:51:21,119 --> 00:51:24,960 I I think the idea here was to be 1170 00:51:22,880 --> 00:51:27,280 flexible, especially since we are 1171 00:51:24,960 --> 00:51:28,559 talking about regulating a new not 1172 00:51:27,280 --> 00:51:29,839 necessarily sure if it's new technology, 1173 00:51:28,559 --> 00:51:32,160 but at least a new potential business 1174 00:51:29,839 --> 00:51:34,800 practice that we want to maintain some 1175 00:51:32,160 --> 00:51:36,800 flexibility. Um certainly if if the 1176 00:51:34,800 --> 00:51:39,440 council does preer prefer something more 1177 00:51:36,800 --> 00:51:41,119 formal uh we certainly understand and we 1178 00:51:39,440 --> 00:51:42,400 can build that in but it'd be helpful to 1179 00:51:41,119 --> 00:51:44,559 know exactly what the council would like 1180 00:51:42,400 --> 00:51:46,000 on that front but on the first pass I 1181 00:51:44,559 --> 00:51:47,200 think we're trying to be flexible as a 1182 00:51:46,000 --> 00:51:49,920 general manner 1183 00:51:47,200 --> 00:51:52,720 » Because I think Pat there um the 1184 00:51:49,920 --> 00:51:55,440 question is really valid but the deliver 1185 00:51:52,720 --> 00:51:57,760 whoever's delivering the package has to 1186 00:51:55,440 --> 00:52:00,640 get the authorization 1187 00:51:57,760 --> 00:52:02,960 they are required if you're getting food 1188 00:52:00,640 --> 00:52:04,319 delivery from whoever you have 1189 00:52:02,960 --> 00:52:05,680 essentially consent to it being 1190 00:52:04,319 --> 00:52:07,680 delivered on your property, but you're 1191 00:52:05,680 --> 00:52:10,400 right. The city doesn't have any 1192 00:52:07,680 --> 00:52:12,880 evidence that that has taken place. So, 1193 00:52:10,400 --> 00:52:14,720 I guess your question is how do we 1194 00:52:12,880 --> 00:52:16,319 » Well, that I I read it more that the 1195 00:52:14,720 --> 00:52:20,880 city was going to be doing this versus 1196 00:52:16,319 --> 00:52:23,520 the drone the drone people. Um anyway, 1197 00:52:20,880 --> 00:52:24,960 so if that's the case and it just wasn't 1198 00:52:23,520 --> 00:52:26,800 clear to me that we were talking about 1199 00:52:24,960 --> 00:52:29,359 that the drone people would have to get 1200 00:52:26,800 --> 00:52:31,839 this consent, but then how do we know 1201 00:52:29,359 --> 00:52:35,760 who has consent and not? I mean, it 1202 00:52:31,839 --> 00:52:38,480 becomes I, you know, I can see this, 1203 00:52:35,760 --> 00:52:40,800 you know, my great neighbor next door to 1204 00:52:38,480 --> 00:52:42,880 me on the right wouldn't care, but you 1205 00:52:40,800 --> 00:52:45,280 know, my other neighbor on the left who 1206 00:52:42,880 --> 00:52:48,240 wouldn't care either, but might care. 1207 00:52:45,280 --> 00:52:51,520 Um, you know, I mean, and he calls and 1208 00:52:48,240 --> 00:52:54,000 complains, then what where does it put 1209 00:52:51,520 --> 00:52:56,400 the city? Are we creating a a situation 1210 00:52:54,000 --> 00:52:57,760 that we have really no control over? 1211 00:52:56,400 --> 00:53:00,559 » Yeah. So at least with respect to 1212 00:52:57,760 --> 00:53:02,079 commercial drone delivery facilities, I 1213 00:53:00,559 --> 00:53:03,760 mean that would be subject to a 1214 00:53:02,079 --> 00:53:04,960 conditional use permit which would be 1215 00:53:03,760 --> 00:53:07,440 granted at a you know planning 1216 00:53:04,960 --> 00:53:10,079 commission hearing etc etc. So that is 1217 00:53:07,440 --> 00:53:13,359 you know fairly formal in terms of 1218 00:53:10,079 --> 00:53:16,640 process but in terms of for example you 1219 00:53:13,359 --> 00:53:19,200 know use of certain public areas or if 1220 00:53:16,640 --> 00:53:21,200 someone is receiving a package through 1221 00:53:19,200 --> 00:53:22,880 the through the drone deliveries you 1222 00:53:21,200 --> 00:53:24,720 know a low level of I guess 1223 00:53:22,880 --> 00:53:27,440 authorization would be required and 1224 00:53:24,720 --> 00:53:28,800 again it was intended to be flexible but 1225 00:53:27,440 --> 00:53:31,200 again if the council feels like it needs 1226 00:53:28,800 --> 00:53:32,720 to be more prescribed I think we're 1227 00:53:31,200 --> 00:53:34,640 certainly open to suggestions and 1228 00:53:32,720 --> 00:53:37,599 guidance. 1229 00:53:34,640 --> 00:53:39,040 Yeah, I think I I think I mean I wasn't 1230 00:53:37,599 --> 00:53:42,079 involved in creating it, but I've spent 1231 00:53:39,040 --> 00:53:43,520 a lot of time with it. I I think as far 1232 00:53:42,079 --> 00:53:47,359 as that issue goes, it does a good job 1233 00:53:43,520 --> 00:53:49,119 of separating commercial drone activity 1234 00:53:47,359 --> 00:53:51,119 through the use permit process, which 1235 00:53:49,119 --> 00:53:53,359 can add, as Andrew talked about, far 1236 00:53:51,119 --> 00:53:54,880 more specifics and far more detailed 1237 00:53:53,359 --> 00:53:56,800 requirements 1238 00:53:54,880 --> 00:53:59,280 um if and when there's a use permit 1239 00:53:56,800 --> 00:54:02,640 applied for. And it's providing the 1240 00:53:59,280 --> 00:54:05,520 flexibility for homeowners to receive uh 1241 00:54:02,640 --> 00:54:07,200 deliveries and or you know become a 1242 00:54:05,520 --> 00:54:08,960 delivery not a delivery center but but 1243 00:54:07,200 --> 00:54:11,520 have have more groundbased services um 1244 00:54:08,960 --> 00:54:13,760 up to a to a limit to be determined. I 1245 00:54:11,520 --> 00:54:17,119 mean 20 here but can be subject to um 1246 00:54:13,760 --> 00:54:19,680 change uh with the onus on the delivery 1247 00:54:17,119 --> 00:54:21,119 agent to get authorization as it says in 1248 00:54:19,680 --> 00:54:23,200 the in the ordinance not in the staff 1249 00:54:21,119 --> 00:54:25,440 report in the ordinance might only be a 1250 00:54:23,200 --> 00:54:27,200 checkbox you know to to agree to 1251 00:54:25,440 --> 00:54:29,760 something as as you place that order. 1252 00:54:27,200 --> 00:54:31,119 So, it's intended to limit structure, 1253 00:54:29,760 --> 00:54:32,480 keep it on private property, keep it 1254 00:54:31,119 --> 00:54:34,480 away from public spaces and so forth, 1255 00:54:32,480 --> 00:54:37,520 then limit it from commercial activity, 1256 00:54:34,480 --> 00:54:39,440 but give the requirement that you have 1257 00:54:37,520 --> 00:54:40,880 to have some written approval by the 1258 00:54:39,440 --> 00:54:42,640 person who is receiving it, property 1259 00:54:40,880 --> 00:54:46,880 owner, not just from from the property 1260 00:54:42,640 --> 00:54:49,359 owner. And uh uh I I applaud it actually 1261 00:54:46,880 --> 00:54:52,000 for for 1262 00:54:49,359 --> 00:54:53,680 creating a framework but not making it 1263 00:54:52,000 --> 00:54:55,520 over restrictively going going forward 1264 00:54:53,680 --> 00:54:58,160 but but knocking out the big risk which 1265 00:54:55,520 --> 00:55:00,800 is the commercial drone aspect of it in 1266 00:54:58,160 --> 00:55:02,800 public spaces and even on on on private 1267 00:55:00,800 --> 00:55:04,079 residences. I only say that because I 1268 00:55:02,800 --> 00:55:04,720 think that knocked off a couple of your 1269 00:55:04,079 --> 00:55:05,119 questions. 1270 00:55:04,720 --> 00:55:08,119 » Okay. 1271 00:55:05,119 --> 00:55:08,119 » Um 1272 00:55:08,960 --> 00:55:16,160 » So um Okay. So then I go into Did 1273 00:55:12,880 --> 00:55:16,960 anybody else want? No, 1274 00:55:16,160 --> 00:55:18,160 » I 1275 00:55:16,960 --> 00:55:19,599 » I have a lot of comments, but we'll 1276 00:55:18,160 --> 00:55:21,040 wait. I mean, let's let's do the 1277 00:55:19,599 --> 00:55:21,680 questions first and then we can bring it 1278 00:55:21,040 --> 00:55:24,480 back. 1279 00:55:21,680 --> 00:55:26,240 » I realize that the staff report is 1280 00:55:24,480 --> 00:55:30,800 bringing up things that are in the 1281 00:55:26,240 --> 00:55:33,280 municipal code. Not they're not writing 1282 00:55:30,800 --> 00:55:34,000 in the staff report what exactly the 1283 00:55:33,280 --> 00:55:35,440 code is more 1284 00:55:34,000 --> 00:55:37,440 » The process. Well, I know the code is 1285 00:55:35,440 --> 00:55:39,359 more valid, but it's it's not also 1286 00:55:37,440 --> 00:55:40,480 addressed in the code either 1287 00:55:39,359 --> 00:55:42,160 specifically. 1288 00:55:40,480 --> 00:55:43,040 » Yeah. I mean, I had a lot of questions 1289 00:55:42,160 --> 00:55:46,400 along the same. 1290 00:55:43,040 --> 00:55:49,280 » So, I can go into the code 1291 00:55:46,400 --> 00:55:52,599 and 1292 00:55:49,280 --> 00:55:52,599 let's see. 1293 00:56:01,440 --> 00:56:06,400 Oh, yeah. I question the 20 deliveries. 1294 00:56:04,240 --> 00:56:12,040 Um 1295 00:56:06,400 --> 00:56:12,040 so in 8.34.040B 040B. 1296 00:56:12,240 --> 00:56:17,680 Um, 1297 00:56:14,880 --> 00:56:19,359 and that has to do with the commercial 1298 00:56:17,680 --> 00:56:22,720 delivery 1299 00:56:19,359 --> 00:56:25,440 and um, it says it will not impair 1300 00:56:22,720 --> 00:56:27,839 residential privacy blah blah blah blah 1301 00:56:25,440 --> 00:56:33,040 blah emergency access, which I don't 1302 00:56:27,839 --> 00:56:36,319 have problems with. Um, but this is in 1303 00:56:33,040 --> 00:56:39,520 reference just to the boardwalk. Um I 1304 00:56:36,319 --> 00:56:42,400 just question when we say um residential 1305 00:56:39,520 --> 00:56:44,400 privacy, quiet and enjoyment, are we 1306 00:56:42,400 --> 00:56:45,920 knocking out the possibility of the 1307 00:56:44,400 --> 00:56:50,319 boardwalk 1308 00:56:45,920 --> 00:56:53,839 using any Belvadier property 1309 00:56:50,319 --> 00:56:57,119 as a commercial use because they're 1310 00:56:53,839 --> 00:56:59,520 right up against the back of Cove Road. 1311 00:56:57,119 --> 00:57:00,960 » I mean my view I think that comes to the 1312 00:56:59,520 --> 00:57:02,799 planning commission for a discussion. 1313 00:57:00,960 --> 00:57:04,000 Correct. Is that right, Andrew? 1314 00:57:02,799 --> 00:57:05,599 » Yeah, that's correct. The planning 1315 00:57:04,000 --> 00:57:08,799 commission would consider, I guess, the 1316 00:57:05,599 --> 00:57:11,119 proposed facility in context. And so I 1317 00:57:08,799 --> 00:57:12,400 can imagine some could be designed with 1318 00:57:11,119 --> 00:57:13,920 appropriate respect for pedest 1319 00:57:12,400 --> 00:57:14,880 pedestrian access. Some may go too far, 1320 00:57:13,920 --> 00:57:18,160 but that would be in the planning 1321 00:57:14,880 --> 00:57:21,040 commission's discretion. 1322 00:57:18,160 --> 00:57:22,960 » Okay. And then 1323 00:57:21,040 --> 00:57:26,000 » I actually 1324 00:57:22,960 --> 00:57:26,880 » I had a question about 040 also. Do you 1325 00:57:26,000 --> 00:57:27,520 want me to add it in? 1326 00:57:26,880 --> 00:57:28,880 » Yeah. Yeah. 1327 00:57:27,520 --> 00:57:30,079 » Or do you want me to come back? Go 1328 00:57:28,880 --> 00:57:34,079 ahead. Start over. 1329 00:57:30,079 --> 00:57:38,319 » Okay. Um, so I was curious about C in 1330 00:57:34,079 --> 00:57:40,880 that section will not create repeated or 1331 00:57:38,319 --> 00:57:42,799 concentrated delivery activity 1332 00:57:40,880 --> 00:57:46,400 inconsistent with Belvadier's 1333 00:57:42,799 --> 00:57:48,880 residential character. 1334 00:57:46,400 --> 00:57:50,799 I don't know what that means. I mean, 1335 00:57:48,880 --> 00:57:52,559 what what are we getting at with that? I 1336 00:57:50,799 --> 00:57:55,920 » I think it's just sort of the amount of 1337 00:57:52,559 --> 00:57:57,599 use that is being proposed. Um, there is 1338 00:57:55,920 --> 00:57:59,040 no hard number in there. Certainly if 1339 00:57:57,599 --> 00:58:00,319 the council did want to provide a hard 1340 00:57:59,040 --> 00:58:00,480 number so the planning commission that 1341 00:58:00,319 --> 00:58:02,160 was 1342 00:58:00,480 --> 00:58:02,880 » I think we had a hard number somewhere 1343 00:58:02,160 --> 00:58:04,880 else right 1344 00:58:02,880 --> 00:58:05,760 » Yeah for the 20 that was but that was 1345 00:58:04,880 --> 00:58:07,359 for residential 1346 00:58:05,760 --> 00:58:10,160 » Exactly that's for residential 1347 00:58:07,359 --> 00:58:12,000 » I read this Jane was um or the analogy I 1348 00:58:10,160 --> 00:58:14,559 had for me was this would be like an 1349 00:58:12,000 --> 00:58:16,480 Amazon warehouse of for a drone like 1350 00:58:14,559 --> 00:58:18,799 what if somebody decided to set up a 1351 00:58:16,480 --> 00:58:21,680 with a commercial use permit 1352 00:58:18,799 --> 00:58:24,079 » Uh where lots of drones came for all of 1353 00:58:21,680 --> 00:58:25,599 the Tibberon Peninsula so they were just 1354 00:58:24,079 --> 00:58:26,799 every second there was a drone coming 1355 00:58:25,599 --> 00:58:28,720 this was their central hub and then they 1356 00:58:26,799 --> 00:58:30,400 would send it out or something. I mean, 1357 00:58:28,720 --> 00:58:33,359 again, that would be just an excessive 1358 00:58:30,400 --> 00:58:35,920 use of a specific location that would be 1359 00:58:33,359 --> 00:58:36,400 out of character, I think, for our 1360 00:58:35,920 --> 00:58:37,920 community, 1361 00:58:36,400 --> 00:58:39,359 » Right? And this is a criteria that was 1362 00:58:37,920 --> 00:58:40,960 intended to be flexible again, so the 1363 00:58:39,359 --> 00:58:42,799 planning commission could on it 1364 00:58:40,960 --> 00:58:43,839 » The proposed use. 1365 00:58:42,799 --> 00:58:45,280 » But certainly, if you did want to 1366 00:58:43,839 --> 00:58:46,319 provide a hard number, you could as a 1367 00:58:45,280 --> 00:58:46,799 bright line. 1368 00:58:46,319 --> 00:58:48,079 » I think 1369 00:58:46,799 --> 00:58:49,839 » I can think there's pluses and minuses 1370 00:58:48,079 --> 00:58:53,680 to either approach. 1371 00:58:49,839 --> 00:58:55,760 I I think one of the problems for me is 1372 00:58:53,680 --> 00:58:59,040 that 1373 00:58:55,760 --> 00:59:02,000 we have a lot of municipal code that's 1374 00:58:59,040 --> 00:59:04,799 flexible and then it get turns against 1375 00:59:02,000 --> 00:59:07,119 the intent because it's too flexible and 1376 00:59:04,799 --> 00:59:09,280 nobody knows what it means. So I think 1377 00:59:07,119 --> 00:59:11,200 my questions 1378 00:59:09,280 --> 00:59:13,599 um are 1379 00:59:11,200 --> 00:59:19,920 you know without it first of all this 1380 00:59:13,599 --> 00:59:22,720 seemed overly long and repetitive to me 1381 00:59:19,920 --> 00:59:26,559 but at the same time certain parts of it 1382 00:59:22,720 --> 00:59:29,200 were not very specific and I worry that 1383 00:59:26,559 --> 00:59:32,079 a company that's very sophisticated 1384 00:59:29,200 --> 00:59:34,160 » Will come in and figure out a way to 1385 00:59:32,079 --> 00:59:38,079 manipulate it because it's not very 1386 00:59:34,160 --> 00:59:40,640 specific. So, um, that's my concern 1387 00:59:38,079 --> 00:59:42,000 going through a lot of this. 1388 00:59:40,640 --> 00:59:42,880 » Yeah. Again, this is just the first 1389 00:59:42,000 --> 00:59:44,720 pass. I 1390 00:59:42,880 --> 00:59:48,319 » I know, but I thought that we were being 1391 00:59:44,720 --> 00:59:49,599 asked to not have this be a second pass. 1392 00:59:48,319 --> 00:59:50,960 Is that correct tonight? 1393 00:59:49,599 --> 00:59:52,160 » No. So, as an ordinance, this will come 1394 00:59:50,960 --> 00:59:53,119 back for a second reading in any 1395 00:59:52,160 --> 00:59:54,640 instance 1396 00:59:53,119 --> 00:59:57,040 » Or second approval. 1397 00:59:54,640 --> 01:00:00,240 » But, Jenn, I mean, I'll jump in a little 1398 00:59:57,040 --> 01:00:01,680 bit because I had some uh involvement in 1399 01:00:00,240 --> 01:00:05,280 this. I think part of the push for this 1400 01:00:01,680 --> 01:00:09,359 is that um we want something on the 1401 01:00:05,280 --> 01:00:11,280 books before this comes to life um and 1402 01:00:09,359 --> 01:00:13,599 to get ahead of it as much as we can and 1403 01:00:11,280 --> 01:00:15,599 really the risk is around these drone 1404 01:00:13,599 --> 01:00:18,960 delivery facilities and and what can we 1405 01:00:15,599 --> 01:00:21,359 do um 1406 01:00:18,960 --> 01:00:23,760 to provide some regulation and this will 1407 01:00:21,359 --> 01:00:26,240 I'm sure evolve over time as the 1408 01:00:23,760 --> 01:00:27,839 industry evolves but to have the biggest 1409 01:00:26,240 --> 01:00:31,040 concern as everybody said is that we 1410 01:00:27,839 --> 01:00:32,640 have this centralized depo where 1411 01:00:31,040 --> 01:00:34,160 thousands of drones are flying over 1412 01:00:32,640 --> 01:00:35,599 every day and if it is on the boardwalk 1413 01:00:34,160 --> 01:00:37,839 and it's in Tibbron's territory, we 1414 01:00:35,599 --> 01:00:39,760 can't control for that. And so that's 1415 01:00:37,839 --> 01:00:41,520 why in some ways there should be at some 1416 01:00:39,760 --> 01:00:44,640 point these discussions with Tibbron to 1417 01:00:41,520 --> 01:00:48,319 see whether we can have some combined 1418 01:00:44,640 --> 01:00:50,640 regulation around this. Um so it's 1419 01:00:48,319 --> 01:00:53,760 really a first attempt to put something 1420 01:00:50,640 --> 01:00:56,960 on the books to to to begin that 1421 01:00:53,760 --> 01:01:00,240 discussion. But I don't know that being 1422 01:00:56,960 --> 01:01:02,079 very prescriptive about this question of 1423 01:01:00,240 --> 01:01:03,599 will not create repeated or concentrated 1424 01:01:02,079 --> 01:01:05,760 delivery activity inconsistent with 1425 01:01:03,599 --> 01:01:07,839 Belvadier's residential character. I 1426 01:01:05,760 --> 01:01:08,880 don't think we can put a number on that. 1427 01:01:07,839 --> 01:01:10,640 I mean that would be 1428 01:01:08,880 --> 01:01:12,880 » I just wonder if it needs to be there at 1429 01:01:10,640 --> 01:01:14,960 all. I guess it doesn't mean anything to 1430 01:01:12,880 --> 01:01:16,480 me. It's not saying anything. It's just 1431 01:01:14,960 --> 01:01:18,400 it's just a finding requirement for the 1432 01:01:16,480 --> 01:01:20,559 for the per for for the for the for the 1433 01:01:18,400 --> 01:01:23,760 use permit which gives the the the the 1434 01:01:20,559 --> 01:01:25,119 planning commission um 1435 01:01:23,760 --> 01:01:26,960 » Discretion if if it's not there they 1436 01:01:25,119 --> 01:01:30,720 don't have discretion over character. 1437 01:01:26,960 --> 01:01:32,799 » So I'm I guess I'm confused which I 1438 01:01:30,720 --> 01:01:35,680 fully admit because I found this very 1439 01:01:32,799 --> 01:01:40,079 confusing and I read it many times until 1440 01:01:35,680 --> 01:01:42,559 I was going crazy. So 1441 01:01:40,079 --> 01:01:45,520 this facility thing can only be 1442 01:01:42,559 --> 01:01:46,720 constructed in a commercial zone, not in 1443 01:01:45,520 --> 01:01:48,079 a residential zone. 1444 01:01:46,720 --> 01:01:48,480 » Correct. Not allowed in residential 1445 01:01:48,079 --> 01:01:51,280 areas. 1446 01:01:48,480 --> 01:01:54,160 » So since it can only be in a commercial 1447 01:01:51,280 --> 01:01:56,400 zone in Belvadier, our only commercial 1448 01:01:54,160 --> 01:01:58,880 zone in Belvadier is the back parking 1449 01:01:56,400 --> 01:02:00,000 lot of the boardwalk and maybe the 1450 01:01:58,880 --> 01:02:02,319 nursery school. 1451 01:02:00,000 --> 01:02:05,680 » Yes. Very small areas of Belvier. 1452 01:02:02,319 --> 01:02:08,640 » So we've written this whole thing about 1453 01:02:05,680 --> 01:02:10,559 that. those two small areas. Mhm. 1454 01:02:08,640 --> 01:02:12,720 » And I think that's what's confusing 1455 01:02:10,559 --> 01:02:15,680 about it because I don't know why we 1456 01:02:12,720 --> 01:02:17,920 just don't say 1457 01:02:15,680 --> 01:02:21,440 there's no, you know, these are where we 1458 01:02:17,920 --> 01:02:24,079 have commercial zones and this is where 1459 01:02:21,440 --> 01:02:26,559 it relates and then go into it rather 1460 01:02:24,079 --> 01:02:30,640 than the confusion of feeling like it 1461 01:02:26,559 --> 01:02:32,960 could be on private property or if 1462 01:02:30,640 --> 01:02:35,920 someone uses it more than 19 times it 1463 01:02:32,960 --> 01:02:38,880 becomes a facility but yet can't be a 1464 01:02:35,920 --> 01:02:42,319 facility because it's a residential. 1465 01:02:38,880 --> 01:02:45,119 So that's where my I'm just confused by 1466 01:02:42,319 --> 01:02:47,440 it. We have such a little commercial 1467 01:02:45,119 --> 01:02:50,640 area and I agree with Sally. I think 1468 01:02:47,440 --> 01:02:53,280 it's mostly Tibbron that could have a 1469 01:02:50,640 --> 01:02:55,040 facility there and then we really do 1470 01:02:53,280 --> 01:02:57,040 need to work with them to figure out if 1471 01:02:55,040 --> 01:03:00,640 they're going to set anything up because 1472 01:02:57,040 --> 01:03:04,160 for us this is kind of this whole thing 1473 01:03:00,640 --> 01:03:06,079 is only relating to a very tiny section 1474 01:03:04,160 --> 01:03:07,680 of possibility. But if we don't have 1475 01:03:06,079 --> 01:03:09,599 something on our books, Amazon just 1476 01:03:07,680 --> 01:03:11,440 decides to buy the nursery school and we 1477 01:03:09,599 --> 01:03:11,680 have nothing there and they set up their 1478 01:03:11,440 --> 01:03:13,200 drone 1479 01:03:11,680 --> 01:03:15,680 » Deliver nothing on the books. I'm saying 1480 01:03:13,200 --> 01:03:17,119 this is so complicated for 1481 01:03:15,680 --> 01:03:19,760 » But but I think it's 1482 01:03:17,119 --> 01:03:21,280 » But I think it's trying to balance the 1483 01:03:19,760 --> 01:03:23,280 need that some people are going to want 1484 01:03:21,280 --> 01:03:25,119 to take an occasional dinner delivery 1485 01:03:23,280 --> 01:03:28,640 from San Francisco and we shouldn't be a 1486 01:03:25,119 --> 01:03:30,400 we shouldn't uh disallow that and some 1487 01:03:28,640 --> 01:03:31,520 people want medical deliveries and those 1488 01:03:30,400 --> 01:03:32,720 things should be allowed. It's a 1489 01:03:31,520 --> 01:03:35,359 question of when does it become a 1490 01:03:32,720 --> 01:03:36,720 nuisance to the community at large. So 1491 01:03:35,359 --> 01:03:38,880 having some cap on the number of 1492 01:03:36,720 --> 01:03:40,880 deliveries a month and who knows what I 1493 01:03:38,880 --> 01:03:41,200 don't know what that appropriate cap is. 1494 01:03:40,880 --> 01:03:44,160 It 1495 01:03:41,200 --> 01:03:44,720 » I mean 19 per household seemed very high 1496 01:03:44,160 --> 01:03:46,160 to me. 1497 01:03:44,720 --> 01:03:48,559 » Well I think in five years that might 1498 01:03:46,160 --> 01:03:52,880 not that might be pretty regular 1499 01:03:48,559 --> 01:03:56,160 » And I mean I did watch all the videos. 1500 01:03:52,880 --> 01:03:57,920 I I mean it at this point 1501 01:03:56,160 --> 01:03:59,680 » That we're writing it, they're only 1502 01:03:57,920 --> 01:04:01,119 delivering things that are between two 1503 01:03:59,680 --> 01:04:05,359 and four pounds. 1504 01:04:01,119 --> 01:04:07,680 » They can't deliver on hills and uh 1505 01:04:05,359 --> 01:04:09,760 a lot of foliage and trees. They're 1506 01:04:07,680 --> 01:04:10,160 hovering 25 feet high, 1507 01:04:09,760 --> 01:04:12,160 » Right? 1508 01:04:10,160 --> 01:04:16,000 » And then they lower it down to a flat 1509 01:04:12,160 --> 01:04:20,000 area. And if you notice in the videos, 1510 01:04:16,000 --> 01:04:22,960 everything is looks more like you're not 1511 01:04:20,000 --> 01:04:26,240 in California or maybe you're in Nevada 1512 01:04:22,960 --> 01:04:28,319 and everything's flat, right? And and so 1513 01:04:26,240 --> 01:04:30,319 » But the technology will evolve as well. 1514 01:04:28,319 --> 01:04:32,960 » I get that. But then our 1515 01:04:30,319 --> 01:04:36,480 » Code would also need to evolve. I'm just 1516 01:04:32,960 --> 01:04:40,000 saying right now the high we are coming 1517 01:04:36,480 --> 01:04:41,839 at this so early in the process that 1518 01:04:40,000 --> 01:04:43,760 that we don't know what's going on with 1519 01:04:41,839 --> 01:04:47,520 Tiburn. I'm not against having 1520 01:04:43,760 --> 01:04:49,599 something. I just think this uh has a 1521 01:04:47,520 --> 01:04:51,839 lot of loopholes and I think it's 1522 01:04:49,599 --> 01:04:54,240 confusing. I think we should have 1523 01:04:51,839 --> 01:04:58,240 something I'm hoping that we could have 1524 01:04:54,240 --> 01:05:01,440 something that's easier to read and 1525 01:04:58,240 --> 01:05:04,640 easier to understand. And I don't know 1526 01:05:01,440 --> 01:05:06,880 what that means. I mean, 1527 01:05:04,640 --> 01:05:09,359 you know, I wrote like, could we use the 1528 01:05:06,880 --> 01:05:11,440 word residential in some of these where 1529 01:05:09,359 --> 01:05:13,280 it's hard to even know is it residential 1530 01:05:11,440 --> 01:05:17,119 or non-residential 1531 01:05:13,280 --> 01:05:19,440 and um you know, no person may use 1532 01:05:17,119 --> 01:05:22,000 private property for delivery. Well, do 1533 01:05:19,440 --> 01:05:24,480 you mean an occupant? Do you mean a 1534 01:05:22,000 --> 01:05:28,440 company? What does that mean? No person 1535 01:05:24,480 --> 01:05:28,440 may use private property, 1536 01:05:28,720 --> 01:05:34,160 isn't it? A company that's delivering 1537 01:05:30,720 --> 01:05:35,920 it. There's no person in the drone. So, 1538 01:05:34,160 --> 01:05:37,440 » Right. But, and the idea there is that 1539 01:05:35,920 --> 01:05:38,720 they need the property owner's consent 1540 01:05:37,440 --> 01:05:40,559 before doing that. Okay. 1541 01:05:38,720 --> 01:05:42,559 » Right. Before delivering the package, it 1542 01:05:40,559 --> 01:05:43,280 needs to be the, you know, owner asking 1543 01:05:42,559 --> 01:05:43,920 for it. 1544 01:05:43,280 --> 01:05:45,680 » Right. 1545 01:05:43,920 --> 01:05:47,200 » Right. And the other thing, if you don't 1546 01:05:45,680 --> 01:05:48,640 put anything down on paper, if these 1547 01:05:47,200 --> 01:05:51,280 deliveries start happening and people 1548 01:05:48,640 --> 01:05:52,400 don't have space on their own property, 1549 01:05:51,280 --> 01:05:53,599 because a lot of people don't, they 1550 01:05:52,400 --> 01:05:56,480 might start getting deliveries in the 1551 01:05:53,599 --> 01:05:57,280 middle of the road if we don't 1552 01:05:56,480 --> 01:05:58,960 regulate. 1553 01:05:57,280 --> 01:06:00,640 » I think all the public stuff should 1554 01:05:58,960 --> 01:06:03,280 absolutely be there. 1555 01:06:00,640 --> 01:06:06,799 » And I think specificity about the only 1556 01:06:03,280 --> 01:06:09,760 appropriate place for a facility is in 1557 01:06:06,799 --> 01:06:10,960 the commercial nonresidential. 1558 01:06:09,760 --> 01:06:11,760 » Doesn't it say that? 1559 01:06:10,960 --> 01:06:14,240 » Yeah. Can I 1560 01:06:11,760 --> 01:06:16,000 » Does it in a lot of many places? and 1561 01:06:14,240 --> 01:06:17,200 very confusing. 1562 01:06:16,000 --> 01:06:18,880 » I think we should continue taking 1563 01:06:17,200 --> 01:06:21,200 comments and do what the process is 1564 01:06:18,880 --> 01:06:22,960 intended is to take those comments and 1565 01:06:21,200 --> 01:06:24,319 then go through a rev. 1566 01:06:22,960 --> 01:06:25,680 » I I three more comments. 1567 01:06:24,319 --> 01:06:28,079 » Yeah. Yeah. I mean, but I think that's 1568 01:06:25,680 --> 01:06:28,880 this is actually why we have two 1569 01:06:28,079 --> 01:06:30,400 readings. 1570 01:06:28,880 --> 01:06:31,760 » Yeah. Pat, do you want to continue with 1571 01:06:30,400 --> 01:06:32,319 your questions? 1572 01:06:31,760 --> 01:06:35,680 » Sure. 1573 01:06:32,319 --> 01:06:40,000 » So, this one these are much easier I 1574 01:06:35,680 --> 01:06:43,039 think. So, 2034.050 50 C. 1575 01:06:40,000 --> 01:06:46,000 It says um interfere with emergency 1576 01:06:43,039 --> 01:06:49,440 vehicle access is a public nuisance and 1577 01:06:46,000 --> 01:06:50,880 I'm and maybe immediately abate it. 1578 01:06:49,440 --> 01:06:53,599 Don't you think that should have a 1579 01:06:50,880 --> 01:06:57,440 stronger word than maybe like shall be 1580 01:06:53,599 --> 01:06:59,599 or should or must or something? I mean 1581 01:06:57,440 --> 01:07:02,319 maybe immediately abate it. That what 1582 01:06:59,599 --> 01:07:04,559 that doesn't seem for an emergency 1583 01:07:02,319 --> 01:07:06,240 vehicle a very strong word. 1584 01:07:04,559 --> 01:07:08,480 » Yeah, we can certainly make that change. 1585 01:07:06,240 --> 01:07:08,880 » Okay. See, it's getting better. 1586 01:07:08,480 --> 01:07:13,400 » There you go. 1587 01:07:08,880 --> 01:07:13,400 » Then on 834.80, 1588 01:07:13,680 --> 01:07:20,880 just a typo. Um I think you're um 1589 01:07:17,599 --> 01:07:22,640 talking about um California. Oh, maybe 1590 01:07:20,880 --> 01:07:24,480 it is California. I thought it was our 1591 01:07:22,640 --> 01:07:26,960 code. Never mind. That might be right. 1592 01:07:24,480 --> 01:07:30,880 California has longer code numbers. Then 1593 01:07:26,960 --> 01:07:34,559 in the next sentence it says um you know 1594 01:07:30,880 --> 01:07:37,280 it's saying that the commercial um drone 1595 01:07:34,559 --> 01:07:40,799 may not intentionally connect collect 1596 01:07:37,280 --> 01:07:44,240 use rema retain sell or disclose images 1597 01:07:40,799 --> 01:07:47,720 video audio or sensor data. What says 1598 01:07:44,240 --> 01:07:47,720 sensor data? 1599 01:07:48,480 --> 01:07:53,119 I think sensor data could be anything. 1600 01:07:51,119 --> 01:07:55,039 Uses positioning sensors to find out 1601 01:07:53,119 --> 01:07:57,039 where it is in the world and it could 1602 01:07:55,039 --> 01:07:58,960 somehow, you know, scan a property or a 1603 01:07:57,039 --> 01:08:02,720 house. Yeah, something like that. 1604 01:07:58,960 --> 01:08:04,160 » All right, those were my questions. 1605 01:08:02,720 --> 01:08:06,319 » Jane, do you have more questions or 1606 01:08:04,160 --> 01:08:07,520 should we go to public comment? 1607 01:08:06,319 --> 01:08:09,039 » I've got one quick question real quick. 1608 01:08:07,520 --> 01:08:11,200 Um, I'm trying to find it, Rebecca, and 1609 01:08:09,039 --> 01:08:14,799 I'm not able. Um, in our in our in our 1610 01:08:11,200 --> 01:08:17,040 commercial zones, um, is there any 1611 01:08:14,799 --> 01:08:20,400 misunderstanding that someone could 1612 01:08:17,040 --> 01:08:22,799 identify drone deliveries? 1613 01:08:20,400 --> 01:08:24,640 A drone delivery facility would be an 1614 01:08:22,799 --> 01:08:28,279 allowable use. 1615 01:08:24,640 --> 01:08:28,279 I don't think so. 1616 01:08:29,520 --> 01:08:33,199 » No, it's not. 1617 01:08:30,960 --> 01:08:34,799 » So, I mean, I don't think so either, but 1618 01:08:33,199 --> 01:08:36,080 let me see if I can just find the MUN 1619 01:08:34,799 --> 01:08:38,480 code really quickly. 1620 01:08:36,080 --> 01:08:41,600 » So, that brings up another question. 1621 01:08:38,480 --> 01:08:43,679 Sorry, can I ask one follow? Would it be 1622 01:08:41,600 --> 01:08:44,719 like a warehouse type use or I guess I'm 1623 01:08:43,679 --> 01:08:45,600 not 1624 01:08:44,719 --> 01:08:49,199 » I I don't know that 1625 01:08:45,600 --> 01:08:51,279 » Familiar with what a drone facility I 1626 01:08:49,199 --> 01:08:53,279 know the origins of this is the is the 1627 01:08:51,279 --> 01:08:56,640 is the fact that I've got a bug fly on 1628 01:08:53,279 --> 01:08:59,040 me that uh 1629 01:08:56,640 --> 01:09:00,480 I think the real risks here are the um 1630 01:08:59,040 --> 01:09:02,960 the important things the prohibition on 1631 01:09:00,480 --> 01:09:06,480 residential space and so forth but we 1632 01:09:02,960 --> 01:09:08,560 don't have any um uh prohibitions or or 1633 01:09:06,480 --> 01:09:11,759 or requirement for use permit within a 1634 01:09:08,560 --> 01:09:13,199 commercial area. So my guess is someone 1635 01:09:11,759 --> 01:09:15,839 would have to really thread that needle 1636 01:09:13,199 --> 01:09:17,759 to currently to have that use in a 1637 01:09:15,839 --> 01:09:19,839 commercial area that fits with what's 1638 01:09:17,759 --> 01:09:21,199 allowed in that zone. 1639 01:09:19,839 --> 01:09:22,799 So I'm just I'm just trying to gauge our 1640 01:09:21,199 --> 01:09:25,359 risk about right now in in the 1641 01:09:22,799 --> 01:09:27,359 commercial areas. Residentials is is an 1642 01:09:25,359 --> 01:09:28,400 existing risk. I understand we want to 1643 01:09:27,359 --> 01:09:30,239 clear that up. 1644 01:09:28,400 --> 01:09:32,560 » But is it is it better to defi if 1645 01:09:30,239 --> 01:09:33,600 there's any greyness? Is it better? 1646 01:09:32,560 --> 01:09:34,960 » I agree. I'm just I'm just trying to 1647 01:09:33,600 --> 01:09:36,480 trying to get a sense for for us all as 1648 01:09:34,960 --> 01:09:37,199 far as the urgency to do something, 1649 01:09:36,480 --> 01:09:39,440 » Right? 1650 01:09:37,199 --> 01:09:41,600 » Yeah. Yes. when it comes back, I'll look 1651 01:09:39,440 --> 01:09:43,520 I'll look into commercial. 1652 01:09:41,600 --> 01:09:46,560 » Yeah. Just just just just to in the next 1653 01:09:43,520 --> 01:09:47,920 report of it, you know, and and weigh 1654 01:09:46,560 --> 01:09:50,239 in, you know, you know, from a from a 1655 01:09:47,920 --> 01:09:54,159 land use perspective, how vulnerable are 1656 01:09:50,239 --> 01:09:56,400 we in our commercial areas to a a a 1657 01:09:54,159 --> 01:09:58,480 commercial um delivery facility, drone 1658 01:09:56,400 --> 01:10:02,280 commercial facility in our in our 1659 01:09:58,480 --> 01:10:02,280 existing allowable uses? 1660 01:10:02,640 --> 01:10:06,400 » And do we really have commercial zone? 1661 01:10:04,640 --> 01:10:09,280 Don't we have mixed use zone? It's mixed 1662 01:10:06,400 --> 01:10:11,600 use and we do allow uh 1663 01:10:09,280 --> 01:10:13,280 » Equipment rental, leasing, package 1664 01:10:11,600 --> 01:10:16,159 delivery, 1665 01:10:13,280 --> 01:10:18,000 office security. I don't know how. It 1666 01:10:16,159 --> 01:10:20,239 seems like it could sort of manipulate 1667 01:10:18,000 --> 01:10:22,880 itself into that. Yeah, one of those 1668 01:10:20,239 --> 01:10:24,880 uses. 1669 01:10:22,880 --> 01:10:26,640 » So, but do we need to change where we 1670 01:10:24,880 --> 01:10:28,080 say our commercial zone? Because we 1671 01:10:26,640 --> 01:10:30,960 don't really have a commercial zone 1672 01:10:28,080 --> 01:10:32,159 anymore. We have a mixeduse zone. 1673 01:10:30,960 --> 01:10:34,320 » We should say mixed use. 1674 01:10:32,159 --> 01:10:37,280 » We should say mixed use. 1675 01:10:34,320 --> 01:10:38,640 Um, should we go for to public comment 1676 01:10:37,280 --> 01:10:41,440 before we bring this back for further 1677 01:10:38,640 --> 01:10:43,679 discussion? 1678 01:10:41,440 --> 01:10:44,960 » Beth, is there anybody online? 1679 01:10:43,679 --> 01:10:47,920 » There are no hands raised. 1680 01:10:44,960 --> 01:10:50,960 » Okay. All right. So, who wants to go 1681 01:10:47,920 --> 01:10:52,320 first in terms of next steps or 1682 01:10:50,960 --> 01:10:55,120 discussion? 1683 01:10:52,320 --> 01:10:59,760 » Well, it it's it sounds like uh there's 1684 01:10:55,120 --> 01:11:02,080 a fair amount of comments on this. Uh, 1685 01:10:59,760 --> 01:11:03,520 and it's probably not it's probably more 1686 01:11:02,080 --> 01:11:06,159 sufficient than a second reading would 1687 01:11:03,520 --> 01:11:07,760 would tolerate, I would imagine. Uh, 1688 01:11:06,159 --> 01:11:09,360 would it just make sense to have staff 1689 01:11:07,760 --> 01:11:10,560 consolidate the comments? Because we can 1690 01:11:09,360 --> 01:11:12,560 all go through it here, but it might be 1691 01:11:10,560 --> 01:11:14,000 better offline. I don't know. Uh, 1692 01:11:12,560 --> 01:11:18,480 consolidate the comments, come back with 1693 01:11:14,000 --> 01:11:21,440 a with a revised ordinance. 1694 01:11:18,480 --> 01:11:22,960 » I think that's right. Um do we want to 1695 01:11:21,440 --> 01:11:25,600 have a discussion around the number of 1696 01:11:22,960 --> 01:11:28,080 deliveries in 1697 01:11:25,600 --> 01:11:30,239 residential that it was it's just a 1698 01:11:28,080 --> 01:11:34,360 stick your finger in the air. So is 1699 01:11:30,239 --> 01:11:34,360 there any viewpoint there 1700 01:11:34,960 --> 01:11:37,600 » And we've ex given exceptions for 1701 01:11:36,640 --> 01:11:39,280 medical deliveries 1702 01:11:37,600 --> 01:11:40,560 » Maybe start lower and you can always go 1703 01:11:39,280 --> 01:11:42,719 up I mean you can always adjust it. 1704 01:11:40,560 --> 01:11:44,159 » Medical um delivery doesn't count. No 1705 01:11:42,719 --> 01:11:45,520 there exceptions exactly there are 1706 01:11:44,159 --> 01:11:48,320 exceptions to that so we don't have to 1707 01:11:45,520 --> 01:11:51,040 talk about that. So, I did a little um 1708 01:11:48,320 --> 01:11:54,080 research with 1709 01:11:51,040 --> 01:11:56,800 the Google one, Wing, and um actually 1710 01:11:54,080 --> 01:11:58,400 they have a very nice YouTube on Wing 1711 01:11:56,800 --> 01:12:00,960 that you can watch for several minutes. 1712 01:11:58,400 --> 01:12:03,440 It's very interesting. Anyway, there's a 1713 01:12:00,960 --> 01:12:06,080 limit of how much they can deliver and 1714 01:12:03,440 --> 01:12:08,800 even Amazon Air, which is available in 1715 01:12:06,080 --> 01:12:12,400 some cities, however none in California, 1716 01:12:08,800 --> 01:12:16,400 um their limit is um I think five 1717 01:12:12,400 --> 01:12:18,400 pounds. So, um I don't think we're 1718 01:12:16,400 --> 01:12:22,480 talking, you know, like you get a big 1719 01:12:18,400 --> 01:12:26,719 package from Amazon and Wing is only 1720 01:12:22,480 --> 01:12:29,440 right now with Door Dash and Walmart. 1721 01:12:26,719 --> 01:12:30,880 » So, um 1722 01:12:29,440 --> 01:12:32,320 I'm not sure how many people use Door 1723 01:12:30,880 --> 01:12:32,880 Dash and I'm not sure how many people 1724 01:12:32,320 --> 01:12:36,000 use Walmart. 1725 01:12:32,880 --> 01:12:38,719 » My kid daily if I'd let her. 1726 01:12:36,000 --> 01:12:40,000 Um but I think I see the biggest stress 1727 01:12:38,719 --> 01:12:43,280 is like food deliveries from San 1728 01:12:40,000 --> 01:12:46,239 Francisco restaurants which 1729 01:12:43,280 --> 01:12:49,600 » Yeah wanting to do that. We don't have 1730 01:12:46,239 --> 01:12:51,360 any time um restrictions around this. I 1731 01:12:49,600 --> 01:12:52,080 mean we have some thing there's a gnat 1732 01:12:51,360 --> 01:12:52,560 flying around. 1733 01:12:52,080 --> 01:12:56,719 » Yeah. 1734 01:12:52,560 --> 01:12:58,239 » Whoever talks um we don't have any um 1735 01:12:56,719 --> 01:13:00,560 time restraints. I mean, I've looked at 1736 01:12:58,239 --> 01:13:04,560 some other cities that have had drones 1737 01:13:00,560 --> 01:13:07,679 like LA and Rancho Mirage and a couple 1738 01:13:04,560 --> 01:13:10,960 other cities. Um, and some of them say 1739 01:13:07,679 --> 01:13:13,600 it can only operate during um till um 1740 01:13:10,960 --> 01:13:15,679 sunset. They don't allow it when it's 1741 01:13:13,600 --> 01:13:17,360 dark. So, I don't know if that's 1742 01:13:15,679 --> 01:13:22,000 something that should be cons 1743 01:13:17,360 --> 01:13:24,400 considered. Um, you know, or maybe not 1744 01:13:22,000 --> 01:13:26,400 sunset, but say not after, you know, I 1745 01:13:24,400 --> 01:13:28,080 mean, who wants to be in bed at 11:00 1746 01:13:26,400 --> 01:13:30,239 for those of us who go to bed early and 1747 01:13:28,080 --> 01:13:32,000 want to hear a drone delivery of a pizza 1748 01:13:30,239 --> 01:13:34,239 next door? I mean, that would be a 1749 01:13:32,000 --> 01:13:36,400 nuisance to me. 1750 01:13:34,239 --> 01:13:41,280 » Yeah. 1751 01:13:36,400 --> 01:13:43,679 And if we're talking about our two small 1752 01:13:41,280 --> 01:13:46,320 um 1753 01:13:43,679 --> 01:13:49,120 potentially commercial areas for 1754 01:13:46,320 --> 01:13:53,360 facility, do we want to put anything in 1755 01:13:49,120 --> 01:13:56,400 there about um a distance from houses? 1756 01:13:53,360 --> 01:13:59,040 Could we add something like that that it 1757 01:13:56,400 --> 01:14:02,159 we we couldn't have a facility even in a 1758 01:13:59,040 --> 01:14:04,880 commercial area unless it's more than 1759 01:14:02,159 --> 01:14:07,280 200 feet from a residential 1760 01:14:04,880 --> 01:14:09,679 a resident? I don't know if that's 1761 01:14:07,280 --> 01:14:12,800 » But that wipes out the whole boardwalk. 1762 01:14:09,679 --> 01:14:14,480 I mean, why do why even bother why even 1763 01:14:12,800 --> 01:14:16,719 bother having this if we're going to be 1764 01:14:14,480 --> 01:14:20,960 within 200 feet? I mean, the whole back 1765 01:14:16,719 --> 01:14:22,880 of the our mixed use zone is within 200 1766 01:14:20,960 --> 01:14:25,520 feet of houses in every direction. and 1767 01:14:22,880 --> 01:14:28,320 anything that's zoned MU. So we would 1768 01:14:25,520 --> 01:14:29,600 just rule out any commercial use at all 1769 01:14:28,320 --> 01:14:32,000 if we did that. 1770 01:14:29,600 --> 01:14:34,480 » Andrew, Andrew, we had that. Could 1771 01:14:32,000 --> 01:14:36,000 Tibber just ignore anyway if our 1772 01:14:34,480 --> 01:14:39,280 regulation said you can't come within 1773 01:14:36,000 --> 01:14:40,239 200 ft, but it's our rules, not theirs. 1774 01:14:39,280 --> 01:14:41,679 Could they ignore that? 1775 01:14:40,239 --> 01:14:43,199 » It's just for a facility. 1776 01:14:41,679 --> 01:14:45,840 » Yeah, for a facility. Meaning 1777 01:14:43,199 --> 01:14:47,520 » Not for dropping off. 1778 01:14:45,840 --> 01:14:49,120 » So if we had saying you can't have a 1779 01:14:47,520 --> 01:14:51,199 commercial drone facility within 200 1780 01:14:49,120 --> 01:14:52,640 feet, so essentially all of the road 1781 01:14:51,199 --> 01:14:54,719 behind 1782 01:14:52,640 --> 01:14:56,880 that could be problematic. If if Tibbron 1783 01:14:54,719 --> 01:14:58,960 chooses to adopt 1784 01:14:56,880 --> 01:15:00,880 » To allow that within the boardwalk, 1785 01:14:58,960 --> 01:15:02,320 would our rules apply? 1786 01:15:00,880 --> 01:15:03,760 » So, they would 1787 01:15:02,320 --> 01:15:06,480 » I think they'd have to the operator 1788 01:15:03,760 --> 01:15:08,080 would have to comply. Well, Tibbron can 1789 01:15:06,480 --> 01:15:09,280 establish his own rules obviously for 1790 01:15:08,080 --> 01:15:09,920 its jurisdiction. 1791 01:15:09,280 --> 01:15:12,159 » Right. 1792 01:15:09,920 --> 01:15:13,199 » Right. We can't regulate activities in 1793 01:15:12,159 --> 01:15:13,920 TRON. 1794 01:15:13,199 --> 01:15:16,239 » Right. 1795 01:15:13,920 --> 01:15:18,719 » So, if it's wholly with throwing out 1796 01:15:16,239 --> 01:15:21,040 200, I don't even know how far 200 is. 1797 01:15:18,719 --> 01:15:22,480 Yeah, but that's I mean I I think I 1798 01:15:21,040 --> 01:15:23,840 think council member Carat's probably 1799 01:15:22,480 --> 01:15:25,520 right though. If it's 200 feet, it's 1800 01:15:23,840 --> 01:15:26,159 basically saying just don't we're not 1801 01:15:25,520 --> 01:15:26,640 allowing it, 1802 01:15:26,159 --> 01:15:27,760 » Right? 1803 01:15:26,640 --> 01:15:28,800 » And if that's the case, maybe we should 1804 01:15:27,760 --> 01:15:30,239 just say it. 1805 01:15:28,800 --> 01:15:32,000 » But 1806 01:15:30,239 --> 01:15:34,880 » But I 1807 01:15:32,000 --> 01:15:36,560 I mean over time behaviors and and 1808 01:15:34,880 --> 01:15:38,320 expectations will change in terms of the 1809 01:15:36,560 --> 01:15:41,440 community as well and what they want as 1810 01:15:38,320 --> 01:15:44,719 this as this evolves. And so I think 1811 01:15:41,440 --> 01:15:46,719 » Ruling things out completely 1812 01:15:44,719 --> 01:15:48,960 » You can do it. Yeah. isn't necessarily 1813 01:15:46,719 --> 01:15:50,560 the the the right op in in the 1814 01:15:48,960 --> 01:15:52,800 commercial mixeduse zone isn't 1815 01:15:50,560 --> 01:15:54,320 necessarily the right thing either. 1816 01:15:52,800 --> 01:15:56,159 » Right. But certainly to one of your 1817 01:15:54,320 --> 01:15:58,320 earlier comments, mayor, I mean given 1818 01:15:56,159 --> 01:15:59,840 that the boardwalk is a likely location 1819 01:15:58,320 --> 01:16:01,840 for some of these at least commercial 1820 01:15:59,840 --> 01:16:03,760 drone activities. 1821 01:16:01,840 --> 01:16:05,360 » I mean it does seem that cooperation and 1822 01:16:03,760 --> 01:16:06,960 coordination with Tibbron would be 1823 01:16:05,360 --> 01:16:08,159 ultimately be required 1824 01:16:06,960 --> 01:16:10,320 » Required. 1825 01:16:08,159 --> 01:16:11,360 » So wherever we this ordinance, I imagine 1826 01:16:10,320 --> 01:16:13,120 it might be helpful to have a 1827 01:16:11,360 --> 01:16:16,400 conversation with them. 1828 01:16:13,120 --> 01:16:19,040 I mean, I I I think this is a very good 1829 01:16:16,400 --> 01:16:20,320 conversation and I do think that the 1830 01:16:19,040 --> 01:16:22,400 this is going to happen and it's going 1831 01:16:20,320 --> 01:16:24,880 to happen quickly. I think what we need 1832 01:16:22,400 --> 01:16:26,480 to optimize for is the use cases that 1833 01:16:24,880 --> 01:16:28,000 are going to most impact the community. 1834 01:16:26,480 --> 01:16:31,280 I I agree with Jane. think if we have 1835 01:16:28,000 --> 01:16:34,719 such limited opportunities for um 1836 01:16:31,280 --> 01:16:37,360 commercial use um cases in our mixeduse 1837 01:16:34,719 --> 01:16:40,560 zones. I mean if it's just those two I 1838 01:16:37,360 --> 01:16:42,719 mean really for me what I found very um 1839 01:16:40,560 --> 01:16:45,520 satisfying about the ordinance is that 1840 01:16:42,719 --> 01:16:48,080 it's trying to protect from all of these 1841 01:16:45,520 --> 01:16:51,840 drones dropping into Belvadier using 1842 01:16:48,080 --> 01:16:54,400 public space to deliver to homes. So 1843 01:16:51,840 --> 01:16:56,719 envision sitting in your home and the 1844 01:16:54,400 --> 01:17:00,960 drones are landing in the middle of, you 1845 01:16:56,719 --> 01:17:03,440 know, Edgewater or Golden Gate Avenue um 1846 01:17:00,960 --> 01:17:06,400 to deliver something to a resident. And 1847 01:17:03,440 --> 01:17:08,560 so I think what this does is it it 1848 01:17:06,400 --> 01:17:12,159 starts to protect those public spaces 1849 01:17:08,560 --> 01:17:13,920 from use for residential benefit. And I 1850 01:17:12,159 --> 01:17:15,120 think that's the most important thing 1851 01:17:13,920 --> 01:17:17,199 right now because I think that's going 1852 01:17:15,120 --> 01:17:18,960 to have the most immediate impact on our 1853 01:17:17,199 --> 01:17:20,560 residents. I do think we have to have 1854 01:17:18,960 --> 01:17:22,880 something for mixed use as well, but I 1855 01:17:20,560 --> 01:17:25,520 feel like that's not an edge case, but 1856 01:17:22,880 --> 01:17:27,600 it's certainly um a smaller use case 1857 01:17:25,520 --> 01:17:29,360 than I think what could happen if people 1858 01:17:27,600 --> 01:17:32,880 just decide they can land drones 1859 01:17:29,360 --> 01:17:34,400 anywhere for residential deliveries 1860 01:17:32,880 --> 01:17:36,159 because especially in Belvadier where 1861 01:17:34,400 --> 01:17:37,840 not many people have not everyone has a 1862 01:17:36,159 --> 01:17:41,760 level yard, not everyone has a driveway, 1863 01:17:37,840 --> 01:17:43,760 not I mean so I think people will just 1864 01:17:41,760 --> 01:17:46,000 naturally turn to public spaces in order 1865 01:17:43,760 --> 01:17:47,679 to get these drones to deliver items. 1866 01:17:46,000 --> 01:17:49,840 But so what are you proposing for the 1867 01:17:47,679 --> 01:17:51,840 mixeduse zone? 1868 01:17:49,840 --> 01:17:53,520 » For mixed use zones of for those two 1869 01:17:51,840 --> 01:17:55,600 small places, I I think we should 1870 01:17:53,520 --> 01:17:57,600 there's a lot of good thinking in the 1871 01:17:55,600 --> 01:18:00,159 ordinance for that. Um and so I think we 1872 01:17:57,600 --> 01:18:01,600 should definitely you know require a 1873 01:18:00,159 --> 01:18:03,120 conditional use permit and we should go 1874 01:18:01,600 --> 01:18:06,000 through planning and there's a process 1875 01:18:03,120 --> 01:18:09,120 for it. But I I think for me the thing 1876 01:18:06,000 --> 01:18:11,360 that is most urgent is to ensure that we 1877 01:18:09,120 --> 01:18:14,719 are clear that public spaces are not 1878 01:18:11,360 --> 01:18:16,480 available for drone delivery or landing. 1879 01:18:14,719 --> 01:18:18,239 Um because I think residential use is 1880 01:18:16,480 --> 01:18:19,840 going to be the primary use case in 1881 01:18:18,239 --> 01:18:22,800 Belvadier at least initially. 1882 01:18:19,840 --> 01:18:25,199 » Yeah. But but Jane your main point is to 1883 01:18:22,800 --> 01:18:26,640 just s make it simpler make it easy make 1884 01:18:25,199 --> 01:18:28,560 it easier to understand 1885 01:18:26,640 --> 01:18:30,000 » Exact things that are most important to 1886 01:18:28,560 --> 01:18:30,400 us right now. 1887 01:18:30,000 --> 01:18:33,679 » Okay. 1888 01:18:30,400 --> 01:18:35,440 » Like the public area I don't know maybe 1889 01:18:33,679 --> 01:18:37,280 number of 1890 01:18:35,440 --> 01:18:42,159 household 1891 01:18:37,280 --> 01:18:44,560 I don't know I I think the idea of drone 1892 01:18:42,159 --> 01:18:48,159 delivery is 1893 01:18:44,560 --> 01:18:50,640 fantastic because of um traffic, you 1894 01:18:48,159 --> 01:18:52,400 know. I mean, I think in a way it sounds 1895 01:18:50,640 --> 01:18:55,440 amazing because it would cut down on 1896 01:18:52,400 --> 01:18:58,800 cars going up and down our streets and 1897 01:18:55,440 --> 01:19:01,440 Tibbron Boulevard. Um so I'm not anti- 1898 01:18:58,800 --> 01:19:06,000 drone delivery at all. I'm just trying 1899 01:19:01,440 --> 01:19:09,199 to un this just reads very confusing and 1900 01:19:06,000 --> 01:19:16,440 a lot of repetition and a lot of areas 1901 01:19:09,199 --> 01:19:16,440 where it says um you know like um 1902 01:19:16,960 --> 01:19:23,760 if a company I had a question of if a 1903 01:19:20,080 --> 01:19:26,000 company it has repeated violations for 1904 01:19:23,760 --> 01:19:28,800 either nuisance or noise or delivering 1905 01:19:26,000 --> 01:19:31,040 in the wrong location is there a way to 1906 01:19:28,800 --> 01:19:33,040 suspend that delivery? company from 1907 01:19:31,040 --> 01:19:34,719 coming to Belvadier. I mean, you know, 1908 01:19:33,040 --> 01:19:37,520 it's sort of like we write about a lot 1909 01:19:34,719 --> 01:19:39,440 of nuisances, but what what options do 1910 01:19:37,520 --> 01:19:42,080 we have? What what would be a legal 1911 01:19:39,440 --> 01:19:46,800 remedy for us? And I think that was kind 1912 01:19:42,080 --> 01:19:48,560 of missing. Um, so I mean people have to 1913 01:19:46,800 --> 01:19:50,640 sign off, but what about the company 1914 01:19:48,560 --> 01:19:51,360 signing in a way, you know? I don't 1915 01:19:50,640 --> 01:19:53,040 know, 1916 01:19:51,360 --> 01:19:55,040 » Right? I mean, there there are some I 1917 01:19:53,040 --> 01:19:57,280 mean, we try to build or build build 1918 01:19:55,040 --> 01:19:58,640 upon sort of existing remedies and 1919 01:19:57,280 --> 01:20:00,080 procedures that we already have in the 1920 01:19:58,640 --> 01:20:02,480 code. 1921 01:20:00,080 --> 01:20:03,679 Now whether those whether those fines or 1922 01:20:02,480 --> 01:20:05,040 penalties would be a sufficient 1923 01:20:03,679 --> 01:20:06,880 deterrent, that's kind of another 1924 01:20:05,040 --> 01:20:08,640 question. I mean I think we've seen in 1925 01:20:06,880 --> 01:20:10,560 other arenas technology companies maybe 1926 01:20:08,640 --> 01:20:12,480 not maybe sort of acting first and 1927 01:20:10,560 --> 01:20:15,040 dealing with the consequences later. 1928 01:20:12,480 --> 01:20:16,960 » So it's hard to say what would change 1929 01:20:15,040 --> 01:20:19,679 that commercial behavior. I mean I'll be 1930 01:20:16,960 --> 01:20:22,159 honest about that. But to go back to the 1931 01:20:19,679 --> 01:20:23,360 to the earlier I guess it feels like 1932 01:20:22,159 --> 01:20:24,800 people would like to move in the 1933 01:20:23,360 --> 01:20:25,600 direction of simplifying the ordinance 1934 01:20:24,800 --> 01:20:28,159 at least. 1935 01:20:25,600 --> 01:20:30,000 » I may be the only one. I don't know. I I 1936 01:20:28,159 --> 01:20:31,600 think a few have spoken to that. So I 1937 01:20:30,000 --> 01:20:32,239 » Well, simpler is always better. 1938 01:20:31,600 --> 01:20:33,679 » Yeah. 1939 01:20:32,239 --> 01:20:35,600 » Yeah. I mean, would would it be 1940 01:20:33,679 --> 01:20:37,840 something so drastic as taking out the 1941 01:20:35,600 --> 01:20:40,159 provisions about, you know, commercial 1942 01:20:37,840 --> 01:20:41,600 drone facilities and commercial areas or 1943 01:20:40,159 --> 01:20:44,000 mixed use areas? 1944 01:20:41,600 --> 01:20:45,679 » No, that's an important aspect. I mean, 1945 01:20:44,000 --> 01:20:48,000 I was I mean since people said it was a 1946 01:20:45,679 --> 01:20:49,679 sort of I think I think 1947 01:20:48,000 --> 01:20:53,679 » I think Kevin laid it out very well. the 1948 01:20:49,679 --> 01:20:56,000 the the priorities just 1949 01:20:53,679 --> 01:20:58,560 you know a generation ago when pizza 1950 01:20:56,000 --> 01:21:00,719 delivery was a big deal um you know it 1951 01:20:58,560 --> 01:21:02,480 always went to if you live in a a rural 1952 01:21:00,719 --> 01:21:04,400 area it would come to like a local park 1953 01:21:02,480 --> 01:21:05,760 then you'd have to meet them there that 1954 01:21:04,400 --> 01:21:07,199 might be the first step here and so this 1955 01:21:05,760 --> 01:21:08,400 needs to protect against that needs to 1956 01:21:07,199 --> 01:21:09,840 pro protect against dropping in 1957 01:21:08,400 --> 01:21:12,000 Edgewater and Golden Gate as Kevin 1958 01:21:09,840 --> 01:21:13,840 talked about so so I think the 1959 01:21:12,000 --> 01:21:16,400 residential prohibition on residential 1960 01:21:13,840 --> 01:21:18,480 issue and and defining how and where how 1961 01:21:16,400 --> 01:21:20,800 and where and when it can be and when 1962 01:21:18,480 --> 01:21:23,360 and as as Pat Pat talked about can be 1963 01:21:20,800 --> 01:21:24,880 used is important. Um, and then segue to 1964 01:21:23,360 --> 01:21:28,159 the commercial aspect of it where it's 1965 01:21:24,880 --> 01:21:29,760 limited to that. Um, I I I'd be as 1966 01:21:28,159 --> 01:21:31,760 flexible as possible there as you have 1967 01:21:29,760 --> 01:21:33,360 already with with with the with the 1968 01:21:31,760 --> 01:21:34,640 findings necessary and the types of 1969 01:21:33,360 --> 01:21:36,080 things that you're you're you're 1970 01:21:34,640 --> 01:21:37,679 suggesting the planning commission would 1971 01:21:36,080 --> 01:21:40,400 consider because we don't know what it'd 1972 01:21:37,679 --> 01:21:42,080 be. I mean, the the blank company could 1973 01:21:40,400 --> 01:21:43,840 redevelop that property with a with a 1974 01:21:42,080 --> 01:21:45,440 three-story building and and they have a 1975 01:21:43,840 --> 01:21:46,640 facility on the roof that accepts all 1976 01:21:45,440 --> 01:21:48,080 these things, which is probably a great 1977 01:21:46,640 --> 01:21:48,800 solution for the area because it's above 1978 01:21:48,080 --> 01:21:50,000 people's 1979 01:21:48,800 --> 01:21:51,760 » People's zone and you wouldn't care 1980 01:21:50,000 --> 01:21:53,280 about 200 feet at that point. 1981 01:21:51,760 --> 01:21:54,719 » Um, and maybe we want all the tax 1982 01:21:53,280 --> 01:21:57,280 revenue. Maybe we want that that that 1983 01:21:54,719 --> 01:21:59,520 that adjacency. It might not be a bad 1984 01:21:57,280 --> 01:22:01,120 idea. Um, so I don't know that we want 1985 01:21:59,520 --> 01:22:03,040 to necessarily limit it, but we just 1986 01:22:01,120 --> 01:22:05,600 want to be flexible and let the let the 1987 01:22:03,040 --> 01:22:08,480 use permit on the commercial side um be 1988 01:22:05,600 --> 01:22:10,320 be fully discretional discretion I can't 1989 01:22:08,480 --> 01:22:10,960 I don't know what the word is 1990 01:22:10,320 --> 01:22:12,400 » Discretion 1991 01:22:10,960 --> 01:22:15,440 » At the discretion of the planning 1992 01:22:12,400 --> 01:22:17,600 commission I'm sorry uh 1993 01:22:15,440 --> 01:22:19,120 but I think if we can simplify it having 1994 01:22:17,600 --> 01:22:21,120 some experience with with code it's hard 1995 01:22:19,120 --> 01:22:23,199 to simplify though because you you you 1996 01:22:21,120 --> 01:22:24,239 do get circular references all the time 1997 01:22:23,199 --> 01:22:25,760 you know going back on it 1998 01:22:24,239 --> 01:22:27,600 » Right so so it sounds like at this point 1999 01:22:25,760 --> 01:22:30,159 we're not staff is not eliminating 2000 01:22:27,600 --> 01:22:31,679 sections per se, but certainly looking 2001 01:22:30,159 --> 01:22:33,199 towards where we can streamline the 2002 01:22:31,679 --> 01:22:35,280 ordinance a bit. Is that 2003 01:22:33,199 --> 01:22:37,199 » Maybe the flow should should should 2004 01:22:35,280 --> 01:22:37,520 approach the priorities that that laid 2005 01:22:37,199 --> 01:22:38,639 out. 2006 01:22:37,520 --> 01:22:40,480 » I was just going to say I mean there's 2007 01:22:38,639 --> 01:22:42,800 the purpose, the definition, then 2008 01:22:40,480 --> 01:22:43,199 there's residential use rules. 2009 01:22:42,800 --> 01:22:46,000 » Okay. 2010 01:22:43,199 --> 01:22:46,400 » Commercial use rules and then general. 2011 01:22:46,000 --> 01:22:46,880 » Okay. 2012 01:22:46,400 --> 01:22:47,760 » Um 2013 01:22:46,880 --> 01:22:49,679 » That's helpful. Thank you. 2014 01:22:47,760 --> 01:22:50,480 » And then I think that might be more 2015 01:22:49,679 --> 01:22:53,480 straightforward. 2016 01:22:50,480 --> 01:22:53,480 » Okay. 2017 01:22:54,800 --> 01:22:58,560 » Okay. Uh, you have enough direction 2018 01:22:57,440 --> 01:22:59,520 there, Andrew 2019 01:22:58,560 --> 01:22:59,920 » And Robert. 2020 01:22:59,520 --> 01:23:02,320 » Yes. 2021 01:22:59,920 --> 01:23:04,960 » Okay, perfect. 2022 01:23:02,320 --> 01:23:06,560 » And thank you for this because I I I I I 2023 01:23:04,960 --> 01:23:09,120 see how it makes sense to get it on the 2024 01:23:06,560 --> 01:23:12,560 books and I know it's maybe we'll be a 2025 01:23:09,120 --> 01:23:14,159 model for other communities on this. 2026 01:23:12,560 --> 01:23:16,639 » Certainly, the mayor has been helping us 2027 01:23:14,159 --> 01:23:18,400 lead on this issue. 2028 01:23:16,639 --> 01:23:20,719 » Might be a big ass mistake, but let's 2029 01:23:18,400 --> 01:23:24,000 see. 2030 01:23:20,719 --> 01:23:27,760 Um, okay. We are moving on to other 2031 01:23:24,000 --> 01:23:29,679 scheduled items. Uh number six 6 uh 6A 2032 01:23:27,760 --> 01:23:31,520 is an update in discussion of the fire 2033 01:23:29,679 --> 01:23:33,679 annexation with the Tibbron fire 2034 01:23:31,520 --> 01:23:36,239 protection district. And the genesis of 2035 01:23:33,679 --> 01:23:37,840 this was really that Robert had 2036 01:23:36,239 --> 01:23:39,600 essentially said to the council members 2037 01:23:37,840 --> 01:23:41,360 that we would we're still in process but 2038 01:23:39,600 --> 01:23:42,880 that we'd come with a update for the 2039 01:23:41,360 --> 01:23:45,280 council and the community in terms of 2040 01:23:42,880 --> 01:23:48,560 where that negotiation currently stands. 2041 01:23:45,280 --> 01:23:50,639 So Robert, this is all yours. 2042 01:23:48,560 --> 01:23:51,920 » Thank you. Helga and I did discuss it 2043 01:23:50,639 --> 01:23:52,239 and she's going to be introducing this 2044 01:23:51,920 --> 01:23:55,440 one. 2045 01:23:52,239 --> 01:23:57,360 » Sorry, Helga. 2046 01:23:55,440 --> 01:23:59,360 » Thank you, Mayor Wilkinson and city 2047 01:23:57,360 --> 01:24:01,920 council. Before you tonight is the 2048 01:23:59,360 --> 01:24:04,639 update on the city's review of long-term 2049 01:24:01,920 --> 01:24:07,120 options for providing fire and emergency 2050 01:24:04,639 --> 01:24:09,760 medical services, including an 2051 01:24:07,120 --> 01:24:12,560 evaluation of potential annexation to 2052 01:24:09,760 --> 01:24:14,719 the Tibberon Fire Protection District. 2053 01:24:12,560 --> 01:24:16,560 As a council is aware, the city has 2054 01:24:14,719 --> 01:24:19,520 contracted with the Tibbron Fire 2055 01:24:16,560 --> 01:24:21,520 Protection District since 1980. While 2056 01:24:19,520 --> 01:24:23,920 the partnership has consistently 2057 01:24:21,520 --> 01:24:26,159 provided highquality fire and EMS 2058 01:24:23,920 --> 01:24:28,800 services, the current expenditure-based 2059 01:24:26,159 --> 01:24:31,840 contract has become increasingly 2060 01:24:28,800 --> 01:24:34,080 difficult to sustain financially. Fire 2061 01:24:31,840 --> 01:24:36,800 parcel tax revenues have not kept pace 2062 01:24:34,080 --> 01:24:40,239 with contract costs. And in fiscal year 2063 01:24:36,800 --> 01:24:44,800 2627, the tax is projected to fund only 2064 01:24:40,239 --> 01:24:47,520 about 47% of the city's 2.67 million 2065 01:24:44,800 --> 01:24:50,239 dollar contract cost with the remaining 2066 01:24:47,520 --> 01:24:52,159 balance paid by the general fund. Over 2067 01:24:50,239 --> 01:24:54,880 the past few years, the city has 2068 01:24:52,159 --> 01:24:57,199 evaluated several long-term financial 2069 01:24:54,880 --> 01:25:00,400 options to improve the sustainability 2070 01:24:57,199 --> 01:25:04,000 and predictability for fire name EMS 2071 01:25:00,400 --> 01:25:06,000 services. In 2023, the city explored 2072 01:25:04,000 --> 01:25:08,320 voter feasibility polling for a 2073 01:25:06,000 --> 01:25:10,159 supplemental fire tax, which showed 2074 01:25:08,320 --> 01:25:13,360 support well below the twothirds 2075 01:25:10,159 --> 01:25:16,719 threshold required for a special tax. In 2076 01:25:13,360 --> 01:25:18,639 July of 2024, the city began exploratory 2077 01:25:16,719 --> 01:25:21,440 discussion with the fire district 2078 01:25:18,639 --> 01:25:24,159 regarding possible annexation, including 2079 01:25:21,440 --> 01:25:27,280 a joint task force with Tibbron Fire 2080 01:25:24,159 --> 01:25:29,199 District and Marin Lavco. Citygate 2081 01:25:27,280 --> 01:25:31,679 associates were hired to provide 2082 01:25:29,199 --> 01:25:34,080 financial modeling to evaluate a fair 2083 01:25:31,679 --> 01:25:37,040 allocation that would be sustainable for 2084 01:25:34,080 --> 01:25:39,360 both agencies. In addition, the city 2085 01:25:37,040 --> 01:25:40,960 obtained separate legal and financial 2086 01:25:39,360 --> 01:25:43,840 analysis 2087 01:25:40,960 --> 01:25:46,639 on several issues outside the scope of 2088 01:25:43,840 --> 01:25:49,199 citygate. Most importantly, whether we 2089 01:25:46,639 --> 01:25:51,760 could legally transfer our fire parcel 2090 01:25:49,199 --> 01:25:54,800 tax to the fire district or retain it 2091 01:25:51,760 --> 01:25:57,360 under an annexation agreement. The city 2092 01:25:54,800 --> 01:25:59,679 was advised by Marin Lavco that 2093 01:25:57,360 --> 01:26:02,960 annexation could increase the risk of 2094 01:25:59,679 --> 01:26:05,679 the fire tax being repealed over time as 2095 01:26:02,960 --> 01:26:09,280 the purpose of the annexation become 2096 01:26:05,679 --> 01:26:11,600 become became less familiar to voters. 2097 01:26:09,280 --> 01:26:14,800 The city also considered replacing the 2098 01:26:11,600 --> 01:26:17,840 fire tax with a new emergency services 2099 01:26:14,800 --> 01:26:20,400 tax. However, passing a new special tax 2100 01:26:17,840 --> 01:26:23,520 with no sunset and twothirds voter 2101 01:26:20,400 --> 01:26:27,040 approval would be very difficult and was 2102 01:26:23,520 --> 01:26:29,679 ruled out. In March of 2026, the joint 2103 01:26:27,040 --> 01:26:31,920 task force reconvened to discuss the 2104 01:26:29,679 --> 01:26:34,560 findings and due to the risk of the fire 2105 01:26:31,920 --> 01:26:36,880 tax repeal ultimately determined 2106 01:26:34,560 --> 01:26:40,159 annexation was not practical at this 2107 01:26:36,880 --> 01:26:42,239 time. Based on those findings, staff and 2108 01:26:40,159 --> 01:26:44,800 the fire district believe the best path 2109 01:26:42,239 --> 01:26:47,360 forward is to negotiate an updated 2110 01:26:44,800 --> 01:26:50,400 service contract, which was last revised 2111 01:26:47,360 --> 01:26:52,000 in 2000. The joint task force will 2112 01:26:50,400 --> 01:26:53,840 explore transitioning from an 2113 01:26:52,000 --> 01:26:55,920 expenditure-based model to a 2114 01:26:53,840 --> 01:26:58,480 revenue-based model with clear 2115 01:26:55,920 --> 01:27:00,560 definitions of the properties covered. 2116 01:26:58,480 --> 01:27:02,719 The goal will be to develop a more 2117 01:27:00,560 --> 01:27:04,800 predictable and sustainable funding 2118 01:27:02,719 --> 01:27:07,920 model while maintaining the high level 2119 01:27:04,800 --> 01:27:10,239 of fire and emergency medical services. 2120 01:27:07,920 --> 01:27:12,239 Once negotiations are complete, the 2121 01:27:10,239 --> 01:27:14,320 proposed agreement will be reviewed by 2122 01:27:12,239 --> 01:27:17,280 the finance committee before returning 2123 01:27:14,320 --> 01:27:19,920 to the city council for recommendation. 2124 01:27:17,280 --> 01:27:21,040 And with that, staff will take any 2125 01:27:19,920 --> 01:27:23,920 questions. 2126 01:27:21,040 --> 01:27:25,440 » Does anybody have questions? First off, 2127 01:27:23,920 --> 01:27:27,760 Jane, 2128 01:27:25,440 --> 01:27:30,400 » Can you remind me how Tibrron covers 2129 01:27:27,760 --> 01:27:32,320 their how do they pay the uh Tibbron 2130 01:27:30,400 --> 01:27:34,719 Fire District? 2131 01:27:32,320 --> 01:27:38,639 » Um, it's through their property tax. 2132 01:27:34,719 --> 01:27:39,679 They do have a small um fire tax as 2133 01:27:38,639 --> 01:27:41,199 well. So 2134 01:27:39,679 --> 01:27:43,120 » So it's not a parcel tax. 2135 01:27:41,199 --> 01:27:46,480 » I mean a par they have a small parcel 2136 01:27:43,120 --> 01:27:48,000 tax but they they can start and stop 2137 01:27:46,480 --> 01:27:50,239 their parcel tax. 2138 01:27:48,000 --> 01:27:51,600 » James to remind you that the district 2139 01:27:50,239 --> 01:27:52,560 doesn't overlap completely with with 2140 01:27:51,600 --> 01:27:54,800 Tibberon, right? 2141 01:27:52,560 --> 01:27:56,800 » And the district um is paid for as a 2142 01:27:54,800 --> 01:28:00,880 direct appropriation of their taxes. So, 2143 01:27:56,800 --> 01:28:03,360 so um uh the 1% that goes to that that's 2144 01:28:00,880 --> 01:28:04,880 a tax a fixed percentage goes to the 2145 01:28:03,360 --> 01:28:07,600 district if you're in that district and 2146 01:28:04,880 --> 01:28:09,600 a lesser amount goes to the city the the 2147 01:28:07,600 --> 01:28:11,440 town of Tibberon. In our case, we don't 2148 01:28:09,600 --> 01:28:13,360 pay we don't have anybody going to the 2149 01:28:11,440 --> 01:28:15,120 district. It comes to us and we have a 2150 01:28:13,360 --> 01:28:16,639 special tax on top of it combined which 2151 01:28:15,120 --> 01:28:18,560 which we pay. 2152 01:28:16,639 --> 01:28:21,360 » And the reason that exists is because 2153 01:28:18,560 --> 01:28:24,159 the fire district existed when Prop 13 2154 01:28:21,360 --> 01:28:26,400 happened but we had an independent 2155 01:28:24,159 --> 01:28:27,760 voluntary fire department. So if we had 2156 01:28:26,400 --> 01:28:28,000 already been 2157 01:28:27,760 --> 01:28:28,639 » Uh 2158 01:28:28,000 --> 01:28:29,760 » Okay 2159 01:28:28,639 --> 01:28:31,520 » There would have been an allocation 2160 01:28:29,760 --> 01:28:32,719 directly from our taxes but there wasn't 2161 01:28:31,520 --> 01:28:33,280 and that's why we have a contract for 2162 01:28:32,719 --> 01:28:36,080 service. 2163 01:28:33,280 --> 01:28:37,840 » Okay that that's the piece I was 2164 01:28:36,080 --> 01:28:40,560 forgetting 2165 01:28:37,840 --> 01:28:43,040 » And then yeah so about the contract is 2166 01:28:40,560 --> 01:28:45,920 that something that'll come back to the 2167 01:28:43,040 --> 01:28:47,760 council to discuss or how how does that 2168 01:28:45,920 --> 01:28:52,159 move forward? 2169 01:28:47,760 --> 01:28:54,960 So, we will the task force will work on 2170 01:28:52,159 --> 01:28:57,280 a proposed contract and then it we'll go 2171 01:28:54,960 --> 01:28:58,719 to the finance committee and then it'll 2172 01:28:57,280 --> 01:29:01,719 come to council. 2173 01:28:58,719 --> 01:29:01,719 » Okay. 2174 01:29:01,920 --> 01:29:05,520 » Any other questions? 2175 01:29:04,000 --> 01:29:07,840 Okay. Let's open it for public comment. 2176 01:29:05,520 --> 01:29:09,040 Beth, is there any public comment? 2177 01:29:07,840 --> 01:29:11,840 » There are no hands raised. 2178 01:29:09,040 --> 01:29:13,920 » Great. So, does anybody We don't need 2179 01:29:11,840 --> 01:29:17,920 any. There's no motion here. Uh any 2180 01:29:13,920 --> 01:29:20,800 other comments or no that was very easy. 2181 01:29:17,920 --> 01:29:24,080 Uh okay in that case we will close the 2182 01:29:20,800 --> 01:29:25,760 item and we will move on to item 6B 2183 01:29:24,080 --> 01:29:29,280 which is a discussion and possible 2184 01:29:25,760 --> 01:29:31,360 action on an RL for in the public right 2185 01:29:29,280 --> 01:29:35,800 of way for the property at 180 Beach 2186 01:29:31,360 --> 01:29:35,800 Road. Rebecca I think this is you. 2187 01:29:47,040 --> 01:29:51,280 Can you hear me? Yes. Good evening, 2188 01:29:48,239 --> 01:29:53,360 Mayor Wilkinson and council members. Uh 2189 01:29:51,280 --> 01:29:55,280 for your consideration tonight, this is 2190 01:29:53,360 --> 01:29:58,880 a revocable license application for an 2191 01:29:55,280 --> 01:30:01,280 existing curb and new pavers at 180 2192 01:29:58,880 --> 01:30:04,400 Beach Road. 2193 01:30:01,280 --> 01:30:06,159 On June 11th, 2025, the city granted 2194 01:30:04,400 --> 01:30:08,639 design review exception for a small 2195 01:30:06,159 --> 01:30:11,520 addition deck extension, hill elevator, 2196 01:30:08,639 --> 01:30:13,679 and window and door changes. As a 2197 01:30:11,520 --> 01:30:16,239 project progressed, the applicant 2198 01:30:13,679 --> 01:30:19,679 proposed new parking on private property 2199 01:30:16,239 --> 01:30:21,760 with a small portion of the paving 2200 01:30:19,679 --> 01:30:23,840 uh due to the design and angle of the 2201 01:30:21,760 --> 01:30:26,159 parking space in the city right of way. 2202 01:30:23,840 --> 01:30:27,920 So, you can sort of 2203 01:30:26,159 --> 01:30:29,520 I don't know where my cursor is. I lost 2204 01:30:27,920 --> 01:30:32,800 my cursor, but it's down at the bottom 2205 01:30:29,520 --> 01:30:34,639 there, the shaded area. Um, here the 2206 01:30:32,800 --> 01:30:37,280 draft revocable license shows the 2207 01:30:34,639 --> 01:30:40,880 existing curb and proposed pavers shaded 2208 01:30:37,280 --> 01:30:43,679 within the Beach Road rightway. Um, 2209 01:30:40,880 --> 01:30:45,760 additionally, it was uh determined that 2210 01:30:43,679 --> 01:30:48,400 the 2211 01:30:45,760 --> 01:30:52,560 corner of the carport also encroaches 2212 01:30:48,400 --> 01:30:54,960 into the right of way. Um, and so should 2213 01:30:52,560 --> 01:30:57,679 this revocable license be approved 2214 01:30:54,960 --> 01:30:59,840 tonight, we will update the exhibit and 2215 01:30:57,679 --> 01:31:03,280 shade that corner. That carport's been 2216 01:30:59,840 --> 01:31:05,280 there forever. Um, it just was realized 2217 01:31:03,280 --> 01:31:08,800 as we were putting the presentation 2218 01:31:05,280 --> 01:31:11,120 together today. Um, and so that that 2219 01:31:08,800 --> 01:31:13,840 will also be shaded as well. There's 2220 01:31:11,120 --> 01:31:16,880 also that low uh the neighbors landscape 2221 01:31:13,840 --> 01:31:18,719 wall. Um, I don't think it should be 2222 01:31:16,880 --> 01:31:20,560 incumbent on this property owner to take 2223 01:31:18,719 --> 01:31:22,639 on responsibility and liability of their 2224 01:31:20,560 --> 01:31:26,239 neighbor's wall. So, we will address 2225 01:31:22,639 --> 01:31:28,480 that with the adjacent neighbor. 2226 01:31:26,239 --> 01:31:30,560 Um, so tonight, staff recommends that 2227 01:31:28,480 --> 01:31:34,000 the findings for the revocable license 2228 01:31:30,560 --> 01:31:36,639 can be made um as a project benefits the 2229 01:31:34,000 --> 01:31:39,199 public. 2230 01:31:36,639 --> 01:31:42,199 » Okay. Any questions from council 2231 01:31:39,199 --> 01:31:42,199 members? 2232 01:31:43,120 --> 01:31:49,840 » Go for it. Hi. 2233 01:31:46,400 --> 01:31:53,040 Um, just to confirm, so the shaded area 2234 01:31:49,840 --> 01:31:57,600 um that sort of protrudes into Beach 2235 01:31:53,040 --> 01:31:59,920 Road uh is on city property and is 2236 01:31:57,600 --> 01:32:00,880 contemplated to have pavers. 2237 01:31:59,920 --> 01:32:04,320 » Correct. 2238 01:32:00,880 --> 01:32:08,320 » Okay. Just comparing. 2239 01:32:04,320 --> 01:32:09,040 » And is there also a curb on that shaded 2240 01:32:08,320 --> 01:32:12,639 area? 2241 01:32:09,040 --> 01:32:16,239 » Yes. So, they would construct a curb 2242 01:32:12,639 --> 01:32:18,159 partway along there. 2243 01:32:16,239 --> 01:32:19,920 » Um, 2244 01:32:18,159 --> 01:32:21,600 » There's a curb. Yeah, there there there 2245 01:32:19,920 --> 01:32:22,960 was an existing curb and so they're 2246 01:32:21,600 --> 01:32:24,800 going to replace the curb, 2247 01:32:22,960 --> 01:32:25,280 » But there's no curb right now. It's all 2248 01:32:24,800 --> 01:32:26,880 gone. 2249 01:32:25,280 --> 01:32:29,600 » There isn't one right now because of 2250 01:32:26,880 --> 01:32:32,000 their construction staging. Previously, 2251 01:32:29,600 --> 01:32:34,719 there I think. 2252 01:32:32,000 --> 01:32:35,520 » Yeah. Well, that's their low wall. No, 2253 01:32:34,719 --> 01:32:37,520 » That's the curve. Oh, 2254 01:32:35,520 --> 01:32:39,360 » That is the curve. Yeah. So that'll be 2255 01:32:37,520 --> 01:32:40,560 there'll also be a curve 2256 01:32:39,360 --> 01:32:41,840 » Or short. 2257 01:32:40,560 --> 01:32:43,199 » Yeah. 2258 01:32:41,840 --> 01:32:43,600 » Can you can you pull up the next slide 2259 01:32:43,199 --> 01:32:44,159 again? 2260 01:32:43,600 --> 01:32:46,560 » Yeah. 2261 01:32:44,159 --> 01:32:49,760 » That seems like a really difficult 2262 01:32:46,560 --> 01:32:52,159 parking space to navigate into 2263 01:32:49,760 --> 01:32:53,840 » Because you've got you've got the 2264 01:32:52,159 --> 01:32:55,840 carport there. 2265 01:32:53,840 --> 01:32:57,920 » Well, they have a driveway that's half 2266 01:32:55,840 --> 01:33:00,080 of that carport is driveway. 2267 01:32:57,920 --> 01:33:01,840 » Yeah. And so I think they'll level it. 2268 01:33:00,080 --> 01:33:05,520 It's we it's if you go up there now it's 2269 01:33:01,840 --> 01:33:06,639 like it because of their staging. But I 2270 01:33:05,520 --> 01:33:08,480 suppose what they're going to do is 2271 01:33:06,639 --> 01:33:10,719 level the driveway is pretty steep, but 2272 01:33:08,480 --> 01:33:13,520 they'll bring that grade down. 2273 01:33:10,719 --> 01:33:14,000 » Can you go back to the original picture? 2274 01:33:13,520 --> 01:33:16,880 » Yeah. 2275 01:33:14,000 --> 01:33:18,960 » So that whole parking area, Sally, is 2276 01:33:16,880 --> 01:33:19,600 where that stone wall is and all those 2277 01:33:18,960 --> 01:33:20,000 bushes. 2278 01:33:19,600 --> 01:33:23,440 » Yeah. 2279 01:33:20,000 --> 01:33:25,760 » All that's been pushed back 2280 01:33:23,440 --> 01:33:28,080 back. So they where their car is right 2281 01:33:25,760 --> 01:33:31,360 there, they could just go right in front 2282 01:33:28,080 --> 01:33:34,159 of that park car and enter. The parking 2283 01:33:31,360 --> 01:33:34,960 space is behind that stone wall. 2284 01:33:34,159 --> 01:33:36,800 » Right. That makes sense. 2285 01:33:34,960 --> 01:33:39,040 » The legal that's their property back 2286 01:33:36,800 --> 01:33:41,760 there. So it's actually pretty easy to 2287 01:33:39,040 --> 01:33:44,400 enter it. And also if the curb were not 2288 01:33:41,760 --> 01:33:47,199 there, which I don't do not support the 2289 01:33:44,400 --> 01:33:50,000 curb. If the curb were not there, they 2290 01:33:47,199 --> 01:33:52,159 could even come in coming down the hill 2291 01:33:50,000 --> 01:33:53,760 and just turn right into their parking 2292 01:33:52,159 --> 01:33:55,679 spot in the other direction. 2293 01:33:53,760 --> 01:33:56,880 » And if you went and visited the site, 2294 01:33:55,679 --> 01:33:58,960 you would see they've already 2295 01:33:56,880 --> 01:34:02,960 constructed the retaining wall behind it 2296 01:33:58,960 --> 01:34:04,800 and it's all open, so you can see how 2297 01:34:02,960 --> 01:34:05,120 it's pretty easy, right? 2298 01:34:04,800 --> 01:34:09,199 » Yeah. 2299 01:34:05,120 --> 01:34:11,600 » Okay. Um, any other questions for staff 2300 01:34:09,199 --> 01:34:13,840 on this? 2301 01:34:11,600 --> 01:34:17,159 Seeing none, we will open this for 2302 01:34:13,840 --> 01:34:17,159 public comment. 2303 01:34:18,080 --> 01:34:21,120 » Sorry. Uh, Alec Wilson has his hand 2304 01:34:20,880 --> 01:34:22,320 raised. 2305 01:34:21,120 --> 01:34:23,920 » The architect. 2306 01:34:22,320 --> 01:34:25,120 » Any questions for the architect? 2307 01:34:23,920 --> 01:34:30,600 Otherwise, 2308 01:34:25,120 --> 01:34:30,600 » I don't think we have any questions. So, 2309 01:34:31,040 --> 01:34:36,719 » No. Um, in that case, let's bring this 2310 01:34:34,320 --> 01:34:38,880 back for um 2311 01:34:36,719 --> 01:34:40,400 » For discussion. I think that Kevin wants 2312 01:34:38,880 --> 01:34:42,639 to go first. 2313 01:34:40,400 --> 01:34:43,440 No, I don't need to. Um, 2314 01:34:42,639 --> 01:34:47,840 » Yeah, 2315 01:34:43,440 --> 01:34:49,600 » I I think it's a a great way of um, you 2316 01:34:47,840 --> 01:34:51,920 know, leaving some of the parking issues 2317 01:34:49,600 --> 01:34:55,440 in in the city, and I think this seems 2318 01:34:51,920 --> 01:34:57,679 like it's a a win for both the um, 2319 01:34:55,440 --> 01:35:00,560 applicant and the city. The only um 2320 01:34:57,679 --> 01:35:05,360 issue I have is with the papers that are 2321 01:35:00,560 --> 01:35:08,000 in the public um, that bleed over into 2322 01:35:05,360 --> 01:35:10,960 public land or city land. Um, I think 2323 01:35:08,000 --> 01:35:13,280 we've made that accommodation before in 2324 01:35:10,960 --> 01:35:15,920 the past and in hindsight I think it was 2325 01:35:13,280 --> 01:35:17,440 a mistake. It's uh it creates confusion 2326 01:35:15,920 --> 01:35:19,199 when you're driving down the road. It's 2327 01:35:17,440 --> 01:35:22,080 like is that part of the road or is that 2328 01:35:19,199 --> 01:35:23,840 part of somebody's home? Um, and so I 2329 01:35:22,080 --> 01:35:28,000 would strongly advocate for just ending 2330 01:35:23,840 --> 01:35:31,600 the pavers at the property line. Um, so 2331 01:35:28,000 --> 01:35:34,960 uh we're not allowing people to change 2332 01:35:31,600 --> 01:35:38,400 the physical makeup of city land to 2333 01:35:34,960 --> 01:35:38,400 suggest that it's private land. 2334 01:35:39,840 --> 01:35:43,840 you want to go. 2335 01:35:41,840 --> 01:35:46,560 » Is there a chance that without that it 2336 01:35:43,840 --> 01:35:47,199 could be seen as a public parking space? 2337 01:35:46,560 --> 01:35:50,159 » Well, the 2338 01:35:47,199 --> 01:35:52,239 » Well, no, because Can I Can I jump in 2339 01:35:50,159 --> 01:35:54,159 real quick? Okay. First of all, um the 2340 01:35:52,239 --> 01:35:56,639 um there is a parking space there, 2341 01:35:54,159 --> 01:35:58,400 correct? Which the surp doesn't doesn't 2342 01:35:56,639 --> 01:35:59,120 address. 2343 01:35:58,400 --> 01:36:00,639 » There's a parking space. 2344 01:35:59,120 --> 01:36:02,239 » Wouldn't that be removed? There's a 2345 01:36:00,639 --> 01:36:04,880 parking space immediately outside this 2346 01:36:02,239 --> 01:36:05,360 this role license area and part of it 2347 01:36:04,880 --> 01:36:07,199 » Public 2348 01:36:05,360 --> 01:36:10,880 » Public space which is going away 2349 01:36:07,199 --> 01:36:14,159 » Isn't that being removed um and and and 2350 01:36:10,880 --> 01:36:15,679 to the the 2351 01:36:14,159 --> 01:36:17,520 drawing is misleading to what's actually 2352 01:36:15,679 --> 01:36:18,719 there because because I mean it's 2353 01:36:17,520 --> 01:36:21,679 accurate but it's misleading in the 2354 01:36:18,719 --> 01:36:24,000 sense that the the the fence line if you 2355 01:36:21,679 --> 01:36:26,800 go complete completely um horizontal 2356 01:36:24,000 --> 01:36:29,280 left of the of the of the of the gate is 2357 01:36:26,800 --> 01:36:31,440 is that old curb and what they're 2358 01:36:29,280 --> 01:36:33,360 proposing for the new curb going there. 2359 01:36:31,440 --> 01:36:35,760 So it doesn't stick out into the road. 2360 01:36:33,360 --> 01:36:37,760 There's no road be in that gray area. 2361 01:36:35,760 --> 01:36:39,280 » So So it looks like it sticks on the 2362 01:36:37,760 --> 01:36:41,280 road, but it really doesn't. Um it's 2363 01:36:39,280 --> 01:36:42,320 that right there has always been I'm not 2364 01:36:41,280 --> 01:36:43,840 saying it's their property, but it's 2365 01:36:42,320 --> 01:36:46,800 always been defined as their property. 2366 01:36:43,840 --> 01:36:48,960 If you go back to your first slide, 2367 01:36:46,800 --> 01:36:51,760 um with with a picture of it, that's 2368 01:36:48,960 --> 01:36:54,719 what that line is. 2369 01:36:51,760 --> 01:36:57,280 You know, the where the old curb is, 2370 01:36:54,719 --> 01:36:58,639 that's what the the gray area demarks. 2371 01:36:57,280 --> 01:37:01,440 It's the same what it was. 2372 01:36:58,639 --> 01:37:03,040 » Yeah. And so it there's no confusion 2373 01:37:01,440 --> 01:37:04,800 that the road is there because the road 2374 01:37:03,040 --> 01:37:08,400 is is outbound of this. In fact, there's 2375 01:37:04,800 --> 01:37:10,159 a parking space there. Um I I would 2376 01:37:08,400 --> 01:37:12,560 actually I do have a big problem with 2377 01:37:10,159 --> 01:37:15,520 this because because they're they're 2378 01:37:12,560 --> 01:37:17,199 privatizing a public parking space here. 2379 01:37:15,520 --> 01:37:19,040 There was a parking space that was out 2380 01:37:17,199 --> 01:37:21,440 there that wasn't theirs. They're now 2381 01:37:19,040 --> 01:37:22,880 taking their their property and our 2382 01:37:21,440 --> 01:37:25,280 property and making a private parking 2383 01:37:22,880 --> 01:37:26,800 space. And I was just they want to do 2384 01:37:25,280 --> 01:37:28,639 that. They should limit their access and 2385 01:37:26,800 --> 01:37:29,840 keep the outside parking space. meaning 2386 01:37:28,639 --> 01:37:31,679 they should they should keep the curb 2387 01:37:29,840 --> 01:37:33,280 there, keep the parking space, and have 2388 01:37:31,679 --> 01:37:35,679 a more restrictive access to their 2389 01:37:33,280 --> 01:37:37,600 parking space. I mean, I don't know why 2390 01:37:35,679 --> 01:37:39,600 we're allowing them to have a really 2391 01:37:37,600 --> 01:37:42,800 flexible private parking space with with 2392 01:37:39,600 --> 01:37:45,199 with access to and from it while while 2393 01:37:42,800 --> 01:37:48,000 while removing a a public parking space 2394 01:37:45,199 --> 01:37:49,280 in the street. So I guess we should 2395 01:37:48,000 --> 01:37:51,840 there should have been more context here 2396 01:37:49,280 --> 01:37:53,920 because one of the main recommendations 2397 01:37:51,840 --> 01:37:56,960 of the traffic and circulation committee 2398 01:37:53,920 --> 01:37:59,040 way back when was that this congestion 2399 01:37:56,960 --> 01:38:00,080 point is a nightmare for everybody. So 2400 01:37:59,040 --> 01:38:02,239 taking away the parking space is a good 2401 01:38:00,080 --> 01:38:04,239 thing is a hugely beneficial thing and 2402 01:38:02,239 --> 01:38:06,239 so we so Rebecca actually approached the 2403 01:38:04,239 --> 01:38:08,320 homeowners to see if they were willing 2404 01:38:06,239 --> 01:38:10,159 to put a parking space on their property 2405 01:38:08,320 --> 01:38:11,440 so that that parking space could be 2406 01:38:10,159 --> 01:38:12,639 eliminated. It was the key 2407 01:38:11,440 --> 01:38:14,800 recommendation of the traffic and 2408 01:38:12,639 --> 01:38:17,280 circulation committee. So it is so it 2409 01:38:14,800 --> 01:38:19,440 isn't privatizing anything. They agreed 2410 01:38:17,280 --> 01:38:20,639 to to do that because we 2411 01:38:19,440 --> 01:38:21,840 » Well, they are it is their parking 2412 01:38:20,639 --> 01:38:22,800 space. I mean no one will will park 2413 01:38:21,840 --> 01:38:23,760 there now. 2414 01:38:22,800 --> 01:38:25,920 » Right. 2415 01:38:23,760 --> 01:38:27,679 » Right. But I guess they were they were 2416 01:38:25,920 --> 01:38:30,880 the ones that were primarily using the 2417 01:38:27,679 --> 01:38:31,600 public parking space. Correct Rebecca or 2418 01:38:30,880 --> 01:38:32,960 not? 2419 01:38:31,600 --> 01:38:34,960 » Oh yeah. Are people coming to their 2420 01:38:32,960 --> 01:38:37,280 house to help out? So, 2421 01:38:34,960 --> 01:38:40,480 » So, so this will eliminate that public 2422 01:38:37,280 --> 01:38:42,159 space and create a more open area where 2423 01:38:40,480 --> 01:38:45,280 there we all know there's a pinch point 2424 01:38:42,159 --> 01:38:47,520 on Beach Road and there was recent 2425 01:38:45,280 --> 01:38:49,520 police ambulance activity that you know 2426 01:38:47,520 --> 01:38:50,000 it got up there but it it was a tight 2427 01:38:49,520 --> 01:38:52,080 squeeze. 2428 01:38:50,000 --> 01:38:53,280 » Okay. So, so for the record, we we want 2429 01:38:52,080 --> 01:38:55,600 that space gone. Yes. 2430 01:38:53,280 --> 01:38:57,199 » And it's not it's not a detriment to the 2431 01:38:55,600 --> 01:38:58,800 public park. It's a benefit. Okay. I 2432 01:38:57,199 --> 01:38:59,920 wasn't aware of that. I'm sorry. 2433 01:38:58,800 --> 01:39:02,920 » I should have been more clear. 2434 01:38:59,920 --> 01:39:02,920 » Yeah. 2435 01:39:03,119 --> 01:39:11,119 Um, if I can jump in. Um, I I visited 2436 01:39:08,080 --> 01:39:13,360 and I saw exactly where the property 2437 01:39:11,119 --> 01:39:17,600 line was in relationship to everything 2438 01:39:13,360 --> 01:39:21,199 that's shown here. And I think that um 2439 01:39:17,600 --> 01:39:27,040 our our code says a per a parking space 2440 01:39:21,199 --> 01:39:29,760 is 8t by um 18 I think 8t wide by 18t 2441 01:39:27,040 --> 01:39:33,440 long. and they seem to have more than 2442 01:39:29,760 --> 01:39:35,280 more than enough space on their property 2443 01:39:33,440 --> 01:39:39,280 100%. 2444 01:39:35,280 --> 01:39:42,000 I am would not support uh changing our 2445 01:39:39,280 --> 01:39:44,400 the street and adding pavers there. I 2446 01:39:42,000 --> 01:39:46,639 think it should look like street which 2447 01:39:44,400 --> 01:39:49,760 is what matches the driveway and 2448 01:39:46,639 --> 01:39:51,760 everything else. And it does widen that 2449 01:39:49,760 --> 01:39:54,560 terrible choke point there. One of the 2450 01:39:51,760 --> 01:39:57,679 choke points. And as far as the curb, I 2451 01:39:54,560 --> 01:40:00,159 think the curb chokes it again. So, if 2452 01:39:57,679 --> 01:40:03,040 they want a curb, I think they could put 2453 01:40:00,159 --> 01:40:06,400 a curb on their property line. They can 2454 01:40:03,040 --> 01:40:08,880 put a curb there, not come into uh the 2455 01:40:06,400 --> 01:40:12,480 city-owned property. 2456 01:40:08,880 --> 01:40:14,480 And um 2457 01:40:12,480 --> 01:40:17,360 and I think they did us a favor by 2458 01:40:14,480 --> 01:40:19,199 removing that curb so we didn't have to 2459 01:40:17,360 --> 01:40:22,880 ask them to remove it. So, thank you for 2460 01:40:19,199 --> 01:40:25,920 doing that. And I agree that the painted 2461 01:40:22,880 --> 01:40:29,840 parking space should be eliminated 2462 01:40:25,920 --> 01:40:31,520 there. And in fact, if I had a choice, I 2463 01:40:29,840 --> 01:40:33,040 would ask the neighbors next door if we 2464 01:40:31,520 --> 01:40:36,000 could eliminate the one in front of 2465 01:40:33,040 --> 01:40:39,360 them, that house, because those two 2466 01:40:36,000 --> 01:40:43,119 parking spaces really are horrific for 2467 01:40:39,360 --> 01:40:45,520 that corner into Bay View and truck. 2468 01:40:43,119 --> 01:40:48,400 Every truck gets stuck there. I walk it 2469 01:40:45,520 --> 01:40:50,560 at least once a day and it's a nightmare 2470 01:40:48,400 --> 01:40:53,840 anytime but terrible in the morning and 2471 01:40:50,560 --> 01:40:55,760 evening. So getting rid of both those 2472 01:40:53,840 --> 01:40:58,480 would be ideal. I don't I don't know if 2473 01:40:55,760 --> 01:41:00,320 we're able to do that but I don't I 2474 01:40:58,480 --> 01:41:02,159 think they can do everything on their 2475 01:41:00,320 --> 01:41:03,360 own property and that's what I would 2476 01:41:02,159 --> 01:41:04,719 vote for. 2477 01:41:03,360 --> 01:41:06,159 » Rebecca, can I ask a question though 2478 01:41:04,719 --> 01:41:08,560 because because right now until they've 2479 01:41:06,159 --> 01:41:10,320 applied for this RL 2480 01:41:08,560 --> 01:41:12,239 even though there isn't an existing RL 2481 01:41:10,320 --> 01:41:15,280 they have that land right now. Correct. 2482 01:41:12,239 --> 01:41:17,119 Exactly. It the the it won't change. The 2483 01:41:15,280 --> 01:41:18,960 circumstances won't change. The road 2484 01:41:17,119 --> 01:41:20,080 won't get narrower. 2485 01:41:18,960 --> 01:41:21,679 » Right. So, they could just turn around 2486 01:41:20,080 --> 01:41:22,400 and say, "Actually, if we take this 2487 01:41:21,679 --> 01:41:25,400 away, we don't want the 2488 01:41:22,400 --> 01:41:25,400 » RL." 2489 01:41:26,320 --> 01:41:30,880 » They've already built it. 2490 01:41:28,480 --> 01:41:32,560 » We don't. But it's already in their 2491 01:41:30,880 --> 01:41:35,040 existing plans until we ask them to 2492 01:41:32,560 --> 01:41:38,400 submit for this change. They effectively 2493 01:41:35,040 --> 01:41:39,520 already had that land. Correct. Or not. 2494 01:41:38,400 --> 01:41:41,760 » No. 2495 01:41:39,520 --> 01:41:42,719 » Uh I don't know. 2496 01:41:41,760 --> 01:41:45,719 Let me look into that. 2497 01:41:42,719 --> 01:41:45,719 » Okay. 2498 01:41:46,800 --> 01:41:51,600 » No, I mean they can't it's not property. 2499 01:41:49,040 --> 01:41:53,840 They can't build it. Um and and they 2500 01:41:51,600 --> 01:41:55,360 actually can't if they hadn't demolished 2501 01:41:53,840 --> 01:41:57,760 it, they could have left it alone and 2502 01:41:55,360 --> 01:42:00,000 and and not sought a new robo license. 2503 01:41:57,760 --> 01:42:02,159 They've demolished it. So they can't 2504 01:42:00,000 --> 01:42:05,440 rebuild it now necessarily because they 2505 01:42:02,159 --> 01:42:07,440 don't have a license to rebuild it. 2506 01:42:05,440 --> 01:42:08,560 » So that's true, Rebecca. Even if there 2507 01:42:07,440 --> 01:42:10,159 wasn't going to be a parking space, 2508 01:42:08,560 --> 01:42:12,719 they'd have to apply for an RL right now 2509 01:42:10,159 --> 01:42:15,040 because they've removed 2510 01:42:12,719 --> 01:42:17,600 » They've 2511 01:42:15,040 --> 01:42:19,679 » They can fit their car in on their own 2512 01:42:17,600 --> 01:42:20,000 property. They can fit a curb on their 2513 01:42:19,679 --> 01:42:21,199 own. 2514 01:42:20,000 --> 01:42:27,800 » I understand that, but I'm just trying 2515 01:42:21,199 --> 01:42:27,800 to establish um the process here. 2516 01:42:44,639 --> 01:42:52,360 Alec, do you mind unmuting yourself 2517 01:42:48,320 --> 01:42:52,360 or you should be able to speak? 2518 01:42:52,400 --> 01:42:56,400 » Yes. 2519 01:42:54,400 --> 01:42:58,320 » Can you 2520 01:42:56,400 --> 01:43:00,239 » Hello. 2521 01:42:58,320 --> 01:43:01,679 » Alec Wilson, architect for 270 Beach 2522 01:43:00,239 --> 01:43:02,960 Road. 2523 01:43:01,679 --> 01:43:03,840 » 180. 2524 01:43:02,960 --> 01:43:05,920 » Sorry. 2525 01:43:03,840 --> 01:43:09,280 » Look at that. That was a good 2526 01:43:05,920 --> 01:43:11,920 180. Let's have it. 2527 01:43:09,280 --> 01:43:14,239 » Uh, when your original design review 2528 01:43:11,920 --> 01:43:17,360 project went through, Alec, did you guys 2529 01:43:14,239 --> 01:43:19,840 have any um was this that front 2530 01:43:17,360 --> 01:43:21,440 retaining wall or front low curb and 2531 01:43:19,840 --> 01:43:24,560 plants 2532 01:43:21,440 --> 01:43:26,159 part of your original design review? 2533 01:43:24,560 --> 01:43:28,320 » No, our original design review was to 2534 01:43:26,159 --> 01:43:29,679 leave all of that intact, 2535 01:43:28,320 --> 01:43:32,960 » But then through the construction 2536 01:43:29,679 --> 01:43:34,400 staging, you demolished it. 2537 01:43:32,960 --> 01:43:36,880 » Correct. There was a construction 2538 01:43:34,400 --> 01:43:39,199 staging permit and they applied for that 2539 01:43:36,880 --> 01:43:42,000 work to to create an off- streetet 2540 01:43:39,199 --> 01:43:44,400 parking space for staging uh of the of 2541 01:43:42,000 --> 01:43:46,480 the construction process which has been 2542 01:43:44,400 --> 01:43:49,520 very useful indeed. That is an extremely 2543 01:43:46,480 --> 01:43:51,760 tight, extremely dangerous corner. 2544 01:43:49,520 --> 01:43:53,600 » Y 2545 01:43:51,760 --> 01:43:55,280 » And the intention was to build it back 2546 01:43:53,600 --> 01:43:56,719 as is. 2547 01:43:55,280 --> 01:43:58,239 » Yeah. The original intention was to 2548 01:43:56,719 --> 01:44:00,480 build it back as is. And in 2549 01:43:58,239 --> 01:44:03,760 conversations with with you and my 2550 01:44:00,480 --> 01:44:07,119 clients, the the the prospect of getting 2551 01:44:03,760 --> 01:44:09,679 a safer place to park outside of the 2552 01:44:07,119 --> 01:44:10,960 traffic on that corner was how we came 2553 01:44:09,679 --> 01:44:12,560 up with the scheme in front of you, 2554 01:44:10,960 --> 01:44:14,880 which is indeed a parking space 2555 01:44:12,560 --> 01:44:17,119 completely on private property. If you 2556 01:44:14,880 --> 01:44:19,920 drive in and back up a little bit, then 2557 01:44:17,119 --> 01:44:22,639 the car is parked on their property and 2558 01:44:19,920 --> 01:44:25,760 not in the revocable license area. 2559 01:44:22,639 --> 01:44:28,639 » And do you need that um curb 2560 01:44:25,760 --> 01:44:31,119 in front? the curb was there. If that 2561 01:44:28,639 --> 01:44:33,440 parking space were to remain, it gives 2562 01:44:31,119 --> 01:44:36,480 definition to that parking space, not 2563 01:44:33,440 --> 01:44:39,679 having that parking space bleed off into 2564 01:44:36,480 --> 01:44:42,480 um our client space. So, it it's about 2565 01:44:39,679 --> 01:44:44,000 defining those that space and also 2566 01:44:42,480 --> 01:44:45,760 defines the front entrance. Like that's 2567 01:44:44,000 --> 01:44:47,679 the front gate and the front gate as you 2568 01:44:45,760 --> 01:44:49,760 walk down there has a short curb wall on 2569 01:44:47,679 --> 01:44:51,280 both sides. It's kind of classic for old 2570 01:44:49,760 --> 01:44:53,679 Belvadier Island to have those little 2571 01:44:51,280 --> 01:44:56,080 curbs on either side of the gate as you 2572 01:44:53,679 --> 01:44:59,360 walk in. 2573 01:44:56,080 --> 01:45:01,440 » Okay. Thank you. 2574 01:44:59,360 --> 01:45:04,000 » I mean, I think he clarified that the 2575 01:45:01,440 --> 01:45:07,360 curb could go on their property. I see a 2576 01:45:04,000 --> 01:45:08,080 curb like a fence. It's a permanent and 2577 01:45:07,360 --> 01:45:09,840 we don't 2578 01:45:08,080 --> 01:45:11,840 » If that just as a clarification, if that 2579 01:45:09,840 --> 01:45:13,280 curb was to swing onto the property, I 2580 01:45:11,840 --> 01:45:14,320 would not be able to get the car into 2581 01:45:13,280 --> 01:45:16,000 that space. 2582 01:45:14,320 --> 01:45:18,080 » Alec, could you could you swing that 2583 01:45:16,000 --> 01:45:21,440 curb? I agree with you that the the Hi. 2584 01:45:18,080 --> 01:45:23,199 Hi, Alec. This is Peter. Sorry. The um I 2585 01:45:21,440 --> 01:45:25,600 think the curb on on either side of the 2586 01:45:23,199 --> 01:45:28,239 fence is continuity and that works well. 2587 01:45:25,600 --> 01:45:30,159 Could you swing that curb around on the 2588 01:45:28,239 --> 01:45:31,679 side and stop it at the new retaining 2589 01:45:30,159 --> 01:45:33,040 wall 2590 01:45:31,679 --> 01:45:34,560 that's going in? 2591 01:45:33,040 --> 01:45:37,280 » If you look at our drawing there, we've 2592 01:45:34,560 --> 01:45:38,960 got 4 foot five approximately of of curb 2593 01:45:37,280 --> 01:45:41,520 on the left side of the ent of the 2594 01:45:38,960 --> 01:45:43,440 pedestrian entry as you come in. And and 2595 01:45:41,520 --> 01:45:46,080 you know, if it went 4 foot five or six 2596 01:45:43,440 --> 01:45:47,760 feet instead of the the 14T, I just want 2597 01:45:46,080 --> 01:45:49,679 to establish that there's like 2598 01:45:47,760 --> 01:45:52,080 » Pedestrian entry is separate and 2599 01:45:49,679 --> 01:45:54,000 distinct from the from the vehicle 2600 01:45:52,080 --> 01:45:55,199 entrance. That's the most important 2601 01:45:54,000 --> 01:45:57,119 aesthetic part 2602 01:45:55,199 --> 01:45:59,119 » That that that seems more in keeping 2603 01:45:57,119 --> 01:46:01,280 with what we're we're trying to trying 2604 01:45:59,119 --> 01:46:03,520 to do there is to turn that curb, you 2605 01:46:01,280 --> 01:46:06,080 know, as much on the on on the the 2606 01:46:03,520 --> 01:46:08,719 applicant's property as possible and tie 2607 01:46:06,080 --> 01:46:10,560 it into or or or buttend it to the um 2608 01:46:08,719 --> 01:46:12,639 the new retaining wall that that that 2609 01:46:10,560 --> 01:46:16,239 surrounds the new parking space and 2610 01:46:12,639 --> 01:46:19,199 having the the the revocal area be more, 2611 01:46:16,239 --> 01:46:21,520 you know, public facing, public 2612 01:46:19,199 --> 01:46:23,600 appearing and widening of the road that 2613 01:46:21,520 --> 01:46:26,000 that was there. In practice, it's still 2614 01:46:23,600 --> 01:46:27,199 going to be, you know, accessible for 2615 01:46:26,000 --> 01:46:28,480 that parking space. And it actually 2616 01:46:27,199 --> 01:46:30,320 makes that easier because you can go out 2617 01:46:28,480 --> 01:46:31,679 forward or backwards at that point. 2618 01:46:30,320 --> 01:46:33,760 » Yeah. I mean, I think the biggest thing 2619 01:46:31,679 --> 01:46:35,520 as far as widening that road for the 2620 01:46:33,760 --> 01:46:37,360 people driving by is the limitation of 2621 01:46:35,520 --> 01:46:39,760 that parking space. Once that parking 2622 01:46:37,360 --> 01:46:42,080 space is gone, if that parking space is 2623 01:46:39,760 --> 01:46:44,480 gone, then then that's much wider road 2624 01:46:42,080 --> 01:46:46,800 at that point. Uh, one one of the things 2625 01:46:44,480 --> 01:46:50,400 I was dealing with here is that the the 2626 01:46:46,800 --> 01:46:52,400 existing asphalt road of Beach Road 2627 01:46:50,400 --> 01:46:54,320 there has some kind of retaining wall 2628 01:46:52,400 --> 01:46:55,920 supporting the edge of the road. 2629 01:46:54,320 --> 01:46:57,920 » And the reason we're using pavers 2630 01:46:55,920 --> 01:47:00,719 instead of concrete or asphalt is so 2631 01:46:57,920 --> 01:47:03,280 that the existing structure remains 2632 01:47:00,719 --> 01:47:05,440 intact and then the pavers are floating 2633 01:47:03,280 --> 01:47:07,280 on fill held by a new retaining wall 2634 01:47:05,440 --> 01:47:09,119 rather than trying to connect all of the 2635 01:47:07,280 --> 01:47:10,960 structures. And so that was the 2636 01:47:09,119 --> 01:47:13,360 fundamental reason I have pavers is to 2637 01:47:10,960 --> 01:47:15,360 have a flexible connection between the 2638 01:47:13,360 --> 01:47:19,040 two, structurally flexible connection 2639 01:47:15,360 --> 01:47:21,040 between the two rather than um uh tying 2640 01:47:19,040 --> 01:47:25,119 it all together and and having a load of 2641 01:47:21,040 --> 01:47:26,800 beach road beyond that parking space. 2642 01:47:25,119 --> 01:47:28,400 » You also have um and you also have a 2643 01:47:26,800 --> 01:47:29,920 grade change there, don't you? That is 2644 01:47:28,400 --> 01:47:31,840 something. 2645 01:47:29,920 --> 01:47:33,119 » Yeah. So as as you were asking earlier, 2646 01:47:31,840 --> 01:47:34,239 so we're going to be coming in on a 2647 01:47:33,119 --> 01:47:35,679 little bit warp. There's a warped 2648 01:47:34,239 --> 01:47:37,280 driveway leading down to the existing 2649 01:47:35,679 --> 01:47:39,199 carport which will remain. So you can 2650 01:47:37,280 --> 01:47:41,440 still get into the existing carport. And 2651 01:47:39,199 --> 01:47:43,679 then that warp will lead to a largely 2652 01:47:41,440 --> 01:47:45,280 flatter area of that parking space. But 2653 01:47:43,679 --> 01:47:49,199 it will be set up so that the entrance 2654 01:47:45,280 --> 01:47:51,199 is really primarily from the driveway 2655 01:47:49,199 --> 01:47:52,400 rather than from the nose up where and 2656 01:47:51,199 --> 01:47:54,480 that's the other reason I had that curve 2657 01:47:52,400 --> 01:47:57,199 was to help me differentiate the 2658 01:47:54,480 --> 01:47:58,560 » The the slopes. So that that 10-ft curve 2659 01:47:57,199 --> 01:48:00,639 on the right side there helps me 2660 01:47:58,560 --> 01:48:03,360 differentiate the slopes from one side 2661 01:48:00,639 --> 01:48:05,440 to the other where um you know it's it's 2662 01:48:03,360 --> 01:48:07,760 it's pretty steep over there. 2663 01:48:05,440 --> 01:48:10,719 » Yeah. I also think that I mean to to to 2664 01:48:07,760 --> 01:48:13,520 our our our goal here is to limit that 2665 01:48:10,719 --> 01:48:17,280 the 10-ft section of the curb there in 2666 01:48:13,520 --> 01:48:18,880 the in the RL area. Uh having it there 2667 01:48:17,280 --> 01:48:21,840 just gives the possibility someone could 2668 01:48:18,880 --> 01:48:23,920 park there and not having it there 2669 01:48:21,840 --> 01:48:26,159 maintains the widening that that we're 2670 01:48:23,920 --> 01:48:28,080 looking for. 2671 01:48:26,159 --> 01:48:30,719 » Yeah. I mean I think that I think that's 2672 01:48:28,080 --> 01:48:32,719 100% true. The widening though will be 2673 01:48:30,719 --> 01:48:34,080 » Better than without the parking. 2674 01:48:32,719 --> 01:48:35,280 » But someone could still stop there. But 2675 01:48:34,080 --> 01:48:38,000 someone could still park there even 2676 01:48:35,280 --> 01:48:40,000 though there's no, you know, because 2677 01:48:38,000 --> 01:48:41,840 it's still it's still 14 feet. Some, you 2678 01:48:40,000 --> 01:48:44,840 know, someone could easily park there. 2679 01:48:41,840 --> 01:48:44,840 » Yes. 2680 01:48:46,320 --> 01:48:49,840 » Yeah. So, limiting the 10 foot length to 2681 01:48:48,480 --> 01:48:51,280 I don't know if it it stuck out a little 2682 01:48:49,840 --> 01:48:53,119 bit past that other wall would help with 2683 01:48:51,280 --> 01:48:57,000 the transition, but uh it doesn't have 2684 01:48:53,119 --> 01:48:57,000 to be 10 ft for certain. 2685 01:49:00,320 --> 01:49:03,520 I would I I would propose, you know, to 2686 01:49:02,080 --> 01:49:05,199 solve most of her problems that that 2687 01:49:03,520 --> 01:49:09,040 little wall that comes out adjacent to 2688 01:49:05,199 --> 01:49:11,440 the the the entry gate um there turns 2689 01:49:09,040 --> 01:49:14,400 and, you know, does the 4 and 1/2 ft and 2690 01:49:11,440 --> 01:49:16,239 makes its way. However, um the architect 2691 01:49:14,400 --> 01:49:17,920 can integrate it into the the the 2692 01:49:16,239 --> 01:49:19,760 retaining wall, but not have it go into 2693 01:49:17,920 --> 01:49:21,760 the vocal license more than a a small 2694 01:49:19,760 --> 01:49:23,119 little wedge, 2695 01:49:21,760 --> 01:49:24,960 if at all. I mean, keep it on the 2696 01:49:23,119 --> 01:49:26,800 property, that would be better still. I 2697 01:49:24,960 --> 01:49:29,800 I think you could fit it all on the 2698 01:49:26,800 --> 01:49:29,800 property. 2699 01:49:30,800 --> 01:49:36,080 » Yeah. I I don't see a reason for the RL 2700 01:49:33,280 --> 01:49:38,880 unless you have to bring us a different 2701 01:49:36,080 --> 01:49:40,239 one just for that corner. But for this 2702 01:49:38,880 --> 01:49:41,679 » Well, there still needs there still 2703 01:49:40,239 --> 01:49:44,320 needs to be an RL for them to do any 2704 01:49:41,679 --> 01:49:46,080 work to to to replace the existing 2705 01:49:44,320 --> 01:49:47,520 paving in some form or another because 2706 01:49:46,080 --> 01:49:49,440 it's dirt right now. 2707 01:49:47,520 --> 01:49:53,199 » But it's not our property in there. No, 2708 01:49:49,440 --> 01:49:54,719 it is the the gray area. Ours is ours 2709 01:49:53,199 --> 01:49:55,280 and that right now is dirt. 2710 01:49:54,719 --> 01:49:56,800 » Oh, okay. 2711 01:49:55,280 --> 01:49:57,840 » And so we need to authorize in some way 2712 01:49:56,800 --> 01:50:00,639 to repair it. 2713 01:49:57,840 --> 01:50:02,000 » Right. So So what's your proposal? Do 2714 01:50:00,639 --> 01:50:08,960 you 2715 01:50:02,000 --> 01:50:11,280 » I see um uh Alex concern about the um 2716 01:50:08,960 --> 01:50:13,040 jointing and the uh materials between 2717 01:50:11,280 --> 01:50:14,719 the existing old paving and what they're 2718 01:50:13,040 --> 01:50:16,719 doing new and the different retaining 2719 01:50:14,719 --> 01:50:18,080 structures. So I think that's aside from 2720 01:50:16,719 --> 01:50:20,159 the aesthetic aspect of it, they're 2721 01:50:18,080 --> 01:50:23,920 trying to give some flexibility so it 2722 01:50:20,159 --> 01:50:28,199 has a greater long greater life time um 2723 01:50:23,920 --> 01:50:28,199 based on the on the improvement. So 2724 01:50:28,639 --> 01:50:31,760 my sense is I don't know how they're 2725 01:50:30,239 --> 01:50:33,440 going to resolve that grading, but I 2726 01:50:31,760 --> 01:50:35,040 don't think if that were paved, it would 2727 01:50:33,440 --> 01:50:37,119 be part of the road because it's a dip 2728 01:50:35,040 --> 01:50:38,320 into their into into what is perceived 2729 01:50:37,119 --> 01:50:39,600 to be their property. So I don't know 2730 01:50:38,320 --> 01:50:40,880 that you're getting the the benefit of 2731 01:50:39,600 --> 01:50:42,880 that width there anyway, and there may 2732 01:50:40,880 --> 01:50:44,880 be a grade change to do so. So, I think 2733 01:50:42,880 --> 01:50:46,880 the the the the paving is probably okay, 2734 01:50:44,880 --> 01:50:48,800 but I'll be I'll be I'd be okay with 2735 01:50:46,880 --> 01:50:52,480 making that paving as well to match the 2736 01:50:48,800 --> 01:50:54,800 road. But I do think that um we should, 2737 01:50:52,480 --> 01:50:58,800 as Jane was pointing out, turn that that 2738 01:50:54,800 --> 01:51:01,920 small um curb retaining wall that that 2739 01:50:58,800 --> 01:51:03,679 exists walking up the pathway um as as 2740 01:51:01,920 --> 01:51:06,960 close to if not entirely on their 2741 01:51:03,679 --> 01:51:08,960 property as possible. Um so that it it 2742 01:51:06,960 --> 01:51:12,880 retains the grace of that entrance way, 2743 01:51:08,960 --> 01:51:13,840 but not blocking off. um the parking 2744 01:51:12,880 --> 01:51:15,920 space because I think there is 2745 01:51:13,840 --> 01:51:18,400 flexibility to get in and out of it 2746 01:51:15,920 --> 01:51:20,239 without the curb there. And also we 2747 01:51:18,400 --> 01:51:23,679 we're have always been striving to to 2748 01:51:20,239 --> 01:51:28,840 not build um restrictive uh structures 2749 01:51:23,679 --> 01:51:28,840 on our our city right away. 2750 01:51:28,960 --> 01:51:35,760 » Alex, does that seem um 2751 01:51:33,920 --> 01:51:37,440 uh acceptable to you? 2752 01:51:35,760 --> 01:51:39,119 » Yeah, I'll have to verify that with our 2753 01:51:37,440 --> 01:51:42,800 our clients, but I understand what 2754 01:51:39,119 --> 01:51:45,440 you're saying. Um I I do think the the 2755 01:51:42,800 --> 01:51:47,360 parking space going away or not going 2756 01:51:45,440 --> 01:51:48,239 away is an important aspect of all of 2757 01:51:47,360 --> 01:51:51,360 this. 2758 01:51:48,239 --> 01:51:53,280 » Um and but but I understand what you're 2759 01:51:51,360 --> 01:51:56,480 saying, which is is less construction in 2760 01:51:53,280 --> 01:51:58,639 the uh in the street right away. 2761 01:51:56,480 --> 01:52:01,040 » Okay. Great. And unfortunately, Alex, we 2762 01:51:58,639 --> 01:52:04,080 have had, as Council Member Burke 2763 01:52:01,040 --> 01:52:07,040 mentioned, instances uh one in 2764 01:52:04,080 --> 01:52:09,199 particular where uh decorative paving 2765 01:52:07,040 --> 01:52:12,080 was used instead of road and then 2766 01:52:09,199 --> 01:52:14,159 someone put up signs and said no parking 2767 01:52:12,080 --> 01:52:17,840 allowed even though it's really city 2768 01:52:14,159 --> 01:52:21,920 property. and um you know so we haven't 2769 01:52:17,840 --> 01:52:25,679 had a great experience with allowing 2770 01:52:21,920 --> 01:52:28,400 um what is normally considered roadway 2771 01:52:25,679 --> 01:52:32,480 or cement or whatever like your driveway 2772 01:52:28,400 --> 01:52:35,599 the same as the driveway um entry 2773 01:52:32,480 --> 01:52:39,280 uh having it be a decorative 2774 01:52:35,599 --> 01:52:41,760 um and then all of a sudden you know 2775 01:52:39,280 --> 01:52:44,239 people not pulling into it when there's 2776 01:52:41,760 --> 01:52:47,440 two cars coming up against each other 2777 01:52:44,239 --> 01:52:50,159 which is the point of the removing the 2778 01:52:47,440 --> 01:52:53,280 public parking space there 2779 01:52:50,159 --> 01:52:55,440 um is so that they could actually pull 2780 01:52:53,280 --> 01:52:58,960 off a teeny bit more than what's what 2781 01:52:55,440 --> 01:53:03,760 we're seeing uh existing right in the 2782 01:52:58,960 --> 01:53:06,639 original photos. So, um I think that's 2783 01:53:03,760 --> 01:53:09,040 part of our issue there. 2784 01:53:06,639 --> 01:53:10,480 » Yeah. No, I've I've driven up and down 2785 01:53:09,040 --> 01:53:12,960 that road enough to understand exactly 2786 01:53:10,480 --> 01:53:14,480 what you're saying. Um, yeah. So, I'll 2787 01:53:12,960 --> 01:53:17,599 certainly review that with with our 2788 01:53:14,480 --> 01:53:20,639 clients and we'll submit a revised uh 2789 01:53:17,599 --> 01:53:23,040 revocable license um application uh to 2790 01:53:20,639 --> 01:53:24,400 Rebecca to to show that if if my clients 2791 01:53:23,040 --> 01:53:25,840 are comfortable with that. Uh, 2792 01:53:24,400 --> 01:53:28,960 unfortunately, we're not able to join 2793 01:53:25,840 --> 01:53:30,480 tonight, so I can't speak to them. 2794 01:53:28,960 --> 01:53:32,719 » Peter, I had um one question just in 2795 01:53:30,480 --> 01:53:34,639 terms of your suggestion is if you look 2796 01:53:32,719 --> 01:53:37,119 at the streak sort of going down, how do 2797 01:53:34,639 --> 01:53:39,440 you address or do we need to address 2798 01:53:37,119 --> 01:53:41,440 just the visual symmetry of the street? 2799 01:53:39,440 --> 01:53:43,360 Like is that a you know as I'm looking 2800 01:53:41,440 --> 01:53:45,360 at it from the n the gate down it's like 2801 01:53:43,360 --> 01:53:46,719 how does that work? So 2802 01:53:45,360 --> 01:53:48,480 » Well 2803 01:53:46,719 --> 01:53:50,080 » It doesn't look like a jagged 2804 01:53:48,480 --> 01:53:54,000 » Well what they're proposing right now 2805 01:53:50,080 --> 01:53:55,119 anyway I'm sorry we go back to last one 2806 01:53:54,000 --> 01:53:57,520 » This visual is probably 2807 01:53:55,119 --> 01:53:58,960 » Yeah that one that one here um what 2808 01:53:57,520 --> 01:53:59,760 they're proposing is right where your 2809 01:53:58,960 --> 01:54:03,280 cursor is 2810 01:53:59,760 --> 01:54:04,080 » Yeah right here 2811 01:54:03,280 --> 01:54:05,920 right here 2812 01:54:04,080 --> 01:54:07,599 » On the other side of the fence. Yeah. 2813 01:54:05,920 --> 01:54:09,679 » Right here. Right. Right. Right. 2814 01:54:07,599 --> 01:54:11,119 » Is that 2815 01:54:09,679 --> 01:54:12,239 » Can you go left again? 2816 01:54:11,119 --> 01:54:12,880 » A little more left. 2817 01:54:12,239 --> 01:54:13,760 » Yeah. 2818 01:54:12,880 --> 01:54:14,719 » Yeah. 2819 01:54:13,760 --> 01:54:17,679 » Pretty much. 2820 01:54:14,719 --> 01:54:18,239 » Oops. No. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. 2821 01:54:17,679 --> 01:54:19,840 Stop. Stop. Stop. 2822 01:54:18,239 --> 01:54:20,560 » I know. I know. It's not working. Right 2823 01:54:19,840 --> 01:54:22,320 there. 2824 01:54:20,560 --> 01:54:26,000 » Nope. You're on the other side. 2825 01:54:22,320 --> 01:54:27,599 » Okay. Stop there. Stop. That's good. 2826 01:54:26,000 --> 01:54:29,040 » Go back a little more left. One more. 2827 01:54:27,599 --> 01:54:29,520 Click left. 2828 01:54:29,040 --> 01:54:31,760 » Otherwise, 2829 01:54:29,520 --> 01:54:32,719 » It's going to go too far. 2830 01:54:31,760 --> 01:54:33,760 » It won't let me. 2831 01:54:32,719 --> 01:54:34,400 » Okay. Stop right there. Oh, 2832 01:54:33,760 --> 01:54:36,000 » That's good. 2833 01:54:34,400 --> 01:54:38,560 » Okay. That's fine. That's fine. 2834 01:54:36,000 --> 01:54:41,679 » Um, 2835 01:54:38,560 --> 01:54:44,480 don't move. Don't move. The um this 2836 01:54:41,679 --> 01:54:46,400 plan, the the the the gray line is 2837 01:54:44,480 --> 01:54:47,119 intending to match this existing curb 2838 01:54:46,400 --> 01:54:48,000 exactly 2839 01:54:47,119 --> 01:54:50,159 » Right. 2840 01:54:48,000 --> 01:54:52,800 » Except that right where your cursor is 2841 01:54:50,159 --> 01:54:54,400 or thereabouts, that wall would end. 2842 01:54:52,800 --> 01:54:56,880 That little that little stone curb would 2843 01:54:54,400 --> 01:54:57,679 end and all those bushes would be where 2844 01:54:56,880 --> 01:54:58,639 the car parks, 2845 01:54:57,679 --> 01:55:02,960 » Right? 2846 01:54:58,639 --> 01:55:05,119 um and the property but but but that's 2847 01:55:02,960 --> 01:55:08,480 there's a triangle here because the the 2848 01:55:05,119 --> 01:55:10,239 the the property goes from the fence 2849 01:55:08,480 --> 01:55:12,400 where the where the front door is 2850 01:55:10,239 --> 01:55:13,920 » And it angles in at a more acute angle 2851 01:55:12,400 --> 01:55:14,560 than the street is at. 2852 01:55:13,920 --> 01:55:16,719 » Yeah. 2853 01:55:14,560 --> 01:55:18,239 » So so this it's that triangle space I've 2854 01:55:16,719 --> 01:55:21,760 shown in this in this property which 2855 01:55:18,239 --> 01:55:23,840 which would be that. Um, so what the 2856 01:55:21,760 --> 01:55:25,199 what what I'm proposing is that from the 2857 01:55:23,840 --> 01:55:27,599 white fence where the where the front 2858 01:55:25,199 --> 01:55:30,159 door is to about four and a half feet, 2859 01:55:27,599 --> 01:55:32,480 which is what Alec was talking about, 2860 01:55:30,159 --> 01:55:34,960 right about there would turn in and 2861 01:55:32,480 --> 01:55:36,400 match the back retaining wall or butt 2862 01:55:34,960 --> 01:55:38,639 but but to it, however they resolve that 2863 01:55:36,400 --> 01:55:40,239 architecturally, which is now in place 2864 01:55:38,639 --> 01:55:42,000 with with pressuret treated wood, but 2865 01:55:40,239 --> 01:55:45,280 I'm sure it talks about it being a wall 2866 01:55:42,000 --> 01:55:47,360 eventually. um which which which marks 2867 01:55:45,280 --> 01:55:49,520 the inward part of that parking space. 2868 01:55:47,360 --> 01:55:51,520 So that this this curb wouldn't exist 2869 01:55:49,520 --> 01:55:53,599 anymore. Alec was proposing 2870 01:55:51,520 --> 01:55:55,679 differentiating the same line with 2871 01:55:53,599 --> 01:55:57,119 materials, you know, asphalt on the 2872 01:55:55,679 --> 01:55:59,280 right hand side and the pavers on the 2873 01:55:57,119 --> 01:56:01,520 left hand side, which would still retain 2874 01:55:59,280 --> 01:56:04,159 the same look and feel as this road, but 2875 01:56:01,520 --> 01:56:05,599 with wider um opportunity because the 2876 01:56:04,159 --> 01:56:08,159 parking space wouldn't be there and you 2877 01:56:05,599 --> 01:56:09,599 could dip into their into their property 2878 01:56:08,159 --> 01:56:11,599 if you need to, much like the pavement 2879 01:56:09,599 --> 01:56:14,080 down below. 2880 01:56:11,599 --> 01:56:17,119 Got it. 2881 01:56:14,080 --> 01:56:19,199 Thank you. 2882 01:56:17,119 --> 01:56:22,000 » Okay. So, I guess we're just they will 2883 01:56:19,199 --> 01:56:25,199 come back next month with a revised RL 2884 01:56:22,000 --> 01:56:26,320 application. Is that correct? 2885 01:56:25,199 --> 01:56:28,320 » Let's talk. 2886 01:56:26,320 --> 01:56:29,840 » Yeah. So, perhaps one option the council 2887 01:56:28,320 --> 01:56:31,040 can consider is and I understand the 2888 01:56:29,840 --> 01:56:31,760 architect needs to still check with the 2889 01:56:31,040 --> 01:56:32,159 property owner. 2890 01:56:31,760 --> 01:56:35,040 » Exactly. 2891 01:56:32,159 --> 01:56:37,199 » But assuming the owner does sign off, 2892 01:56:35,040 --> 01:56:38,480 I I think we can simply implement 2893 01:56:37,199 --> 01:56:40,080 council's direction. 2894 01:56:38,480 --> 01:56:41,840 » Oh, so you don't need to bring it back. 2895 01:56:40,080 --> 01:56:43,599 Obviously, the owner does not agree, 2896 01:56:41,840 --> 01:56:44,800 then we'll certainly need to come back. 2897 01:56:43,599 --> 01:56:45,360 » Do you need us to vote on it? I assume 2898 01:56:44,800 --> 01:56:45,760 you do. 2899 01:56:45,360 --> 01:56:47,920 » Yes. 2900 01:56:45,760 --> 01:56:49,679 » Okay. Does that seem acceptable to 2901 01:56:47,920 --> 01:56:52,000 everybody? 2902 01:56:49,679 --> 01:56:55,520 » Would you like my opinion? 2903 01:56:52,000 --> 01:56:58,719 » Yes. Well, I didn't think so. Anyway, um 2904 01:56:55,520 --> 01:57:02,000 I have to agree with um Council Member 2905 01:56:58,719 --> 01:57:06,639 Cooper and Burke. I don't think that the 2906 01:57:02,000 --> 01:57:10,480 uh shaded area should be in um anything 2907 01:57:06,639 --> 01:57:14,000 other than uh the asphalt road. And if 2908 01:57:10,480 --> 01:57:16,639 they want to do a differentiation where 2909 01:57:14,000 --> 01:57:18,239 they're uh they will have the pavers on 2910 01:57:16,639 --> 01:57:21,840 there so people will actually know 2911 01:57:18,239 --> 01:57:24,320 that's a private parking space. Um, I 2912 01:57:21,840 --> 01:57:26,320 think the point of the road is is to uh 2913 01:57:24,320 --> 01:57:28,400 widen it 2914 01:57:26,320 --> 01:57:31,040 and to allow cars to be able to move 2915 01:57:28,400 --> 01:57:32,400 over so two cars can pass at that pinch 2916 01:57:31,040 --> 01:57:36,719 point. 2917 01:57:32,400 --> 01:57:41,119 And um I'm fine with what council member 2918 01:57:36,719 --> 01:57:44,239 Mark um suggested that they do a little 2919 01:57:41,119 --> 01:57:46,560 curb just to define the uh front gate, 2920 01:57:44,239 --> 01:57:48,960 but I agree with uh council member 2921 01:57:46,560 --> 01:57:51,040 Cooper that they should be able to do 2922 01:57:48,960 --> 01:57:54,880 that entirely on their property and 2923 01:57:51,040 --> 01:57:57,360 connect it into that uh retaining wall. 2924 01:57:54,880 --> 01:58:00,480 And I think a visit up to the site would 2925 01:57:57,360 --> 01:58:05,599 have been very clear um that all of this 2926 01:58:00,480 --> 01:58:07,280 is all open and able to be navigated. Um 2927 01:58:05,599 --> 01:58:10,880 and they do have some barriers because 2928 01:58:07,280 --> 01:58:13,679 of the construction. Um but I agree that 2929 01:58:10,880 --> 01:58:17,199 I wouldn't be able to approve this RL. 2930 01:58:13,679 --> 01:58:20,159 Um and I would kind of like to see how 2931 01:58:17,199 --> 01:58:25,040 they're going to um I think we need to 2932 01:58:20,159 --> 01:58:28,800 decide if we're going to allow the 2933 01:58:25,040 --> 01:58:30,560 turn of the curb to be in solely on 2934 01:58:28,800 --> 01:58:32,400 their property or if we're going to 2935 01:58:30,560 --> 01:58:34,480 allow it into the RL how much we're 2936 01:58:32,400 --> 01:58:36,239 going to allow otherwise I think it 2937 01:58:34,480 --> 01:58:39,239 needs to come back to this council for 2938 01:58:36,239 --> 01:58:39,239 review 2939 01:58:41,360 --> 01:58:48,159 and I don't know if we've actually 2940 01:58:43,280 --> 01:58:52,159 satisfied are are we in sync on 2941 01:58:48,159 --> 01:58:55,040 where the dark shaded area which is the 2942 01:58:52,159 --> 01:58:58,080 um portion of the street in the RL. Are 2943 01:58:55,040 --> 01:59:02,239 are we aligned on what that is supposed 2944 01:58:58,080 --> 01:59:03,679 to be, what the material is? 2945 01:59:02,239 --> 01:59:05,360 » I mean, why couldn't they come back next 2946 01:59:03,679 --> 01:59:07,360 month with an exhibit and put it on the 2947 01:59:05,360 --> 01:59:08,639 consent calendar if it's all okay? 2948 01:59:07,360 --> 01:59:10,239 » Yeah, certainly. The council would 2949 01:59:08,639 --> 01:59:11,599 prefer to see the update exhibit again 2950 01:59:10,239 --> 01:59:13,679 just to confirm that everyone's on the 2951 01:59:11,599 --> 01:59:14,719 same page. That's certainly also fine. 2952 01:59:13,679 --> 01:59:15,199 » I'm just trying to give the council 2953 01:59:14,719 --> 01:59:16,400 options. 2954 01:59:15,199 --> 01:59:18,159 » It sounds like we need to reach 2955 01:59:16,400 --> 01:59:19,760 agreement on the materials though. right 2956 01:59:18,159 --> 01:59:23,119 now 2957 01:59:19,760 --> 01:59:24,719 » I'm fine with it being paving um match 2958 01:59:23,119 --> 01:59:26,560 the road and I'm I have no problem with 2959 01:59:24,719 --> 01:59:28,080 that if that's if that's easily possible 2960 01:59:26,560 --> 01:59:29,360 and I think the architect and and the 2961 01:59:28,080 --> 01:59:31,840 applicant will look at see if it is 2962 01:59:29,360 --> 01:59:34,719 possible the I think I think one one 2963 01:59:31,840 --> 01:59:37,199 additional thing is um just from a tech 2964 01:59:34,719 --> 01:59:38,400 techn technicality perspective uh I 2965 01:59:37,199 --> 01:59:42,000 would imagine they're going to have to 2966 01:59:38,400 --> 01:59:45,440 repave the portion of um their driveway 2967 01:59:42,000 --> 01:59:47,760 in front of their their covered garage 2968 01:59:45,440 --> 01:59:50,480 that's in the city right 2969 01:59:47,760 --> 01:59:53,520 that's not shown in this RL 2970 01:59:50,480 --> 01:59:57,280 because that's pretty beat up too. 2971 01:59:53,520 --> 01:59:58,639 And um that would go to both um Jane and 2972 01:59:57,280 --> 02:00:00,400 Pat's perspective that if in fact 2973 01:59:58,639 --> 02:00:02,800 they're going to maintain the the 2974 02:00:00,400 --> 02:00:05,440 asphalt, they may want to dip into that 2975 02:00:02,800 --> 02:00:06,880 area as well. So it it it goes all 2976 02:00:05,440 --> 02:00:09,119 across and it really creates a widening 2977 02:00:06,880 --> 02:00:10,480 of the road there 2978 02:00:09,119 --> 02:00:11,920 because that should be it's not just 2979 02:00:10,480 --> 02:00:14,000 this section because they're obviously 2980 02:00:11,920 --> 02:00:15,920 doing some repair in front of their um 2981 02:00:14,000 --> 02:00:18,560 driveway, in front of their carport as 2982 02:00:15,920 --> 02:00:19,679 well. And that's they obviously they I 2983 02:00:18,560 --> 02:00:22,560 think technically don't have the right 2984 02:00:19,679 --> 02:00:25,679 to repair that either without a without 2985 02:00:22,560 --> 02:00:28,480 a license. 2986 02:00:25,679 --> 02:00:30,159 Right. 2987 02:00:28,480 --> 02:00:31,440 I mean if if if they demo it and they 2988 02:00:30,159 --> 02:00:33,440 and they ruin it and they they want to 2989 02:00:31,440 --> 02:00:34,800 put new concrete there, they they they 2990 02:00:33,440 --> 02:00:36,639 should have a license for that in our 2991 02:00:34,800 --> 02:00:38,159 space. 2992 02:00:36,639 --> 02:00:41,159 » Yes, they should have a license for the 2993 02:00:38,159 --> 02:00:41,159 driveway. 2994 02:00:41,599 --> 02:00:45,360 But I agree with Pat that it should 2995 02:00:42,960 --> 02:00:47,440 definitely come back. 2996 02:00:45,360 --> 02:00:49,199 » Just as a point, that could be September 2997 02:00:47,440 --> 02:00:50,239 if we end up not having an August 2998 02:00:49,199 --> 02:00:51,440 meeting. 2999 02:00:50,239 --> 02:00:54,440 » They're not going to be done with their 3000 02:00:51,440 --> 02:00:54,440 project. 3001 02:00:56,000 --> 02:01:00,000 » Uh okay. So that's the direction you 3002 02:00:58,080 --> 02:01:01,440 Rebecca you'll they you'll come back 3003 02:01:00,000 --> 02:01:04,159 next month if we have a meeting or 3004 02:01:01,440 --> 02:01:06,560 September uh and we'll decide whether it 3005 02:01:04,159 --> 02:01:07,360 should go on consent or for discussion 3006 02:01:06,560 --> 02:01:07,920 at the time. 3007 02:01:07,360 --> 02:01:12,679 » Yes. 3008 02:01:07,920 --> 02:01:12,679 » Okay. So we will close the item 3009 02:01:16,719 --> 02:01:22,639 and we're moving to item uh 6C which is 3010 02:01:20,480 --> 02:01:25,520 is a discussion and possible action on 3011 02:01:22,639 --> 02:01:27,840 revocable license for the in public 3012 02:01:25,520 --> 02:01:30,159 right of way for the property at 47 3013 02:01:27,840 --> 02:01:31,920 Westshore Road. Is this Rebecca or 3014 02:01:30,159 --> 02:01:33,760 Sammy? Go ahead 3015 02:01:31,920 --> 02:01:35,440 » Sammy on this one. 3016 02:01:33,760 --> 02:01:37,599 Thank you, Mayor Wilkinson and council 3017 02:01:35,440 --> 02:01:39,199 members. Uh for your consideration this 3018 02:01:37,599 --> 02:01:41,599 evening is a revocable license 3019 02:01:39,199 --> 02:01:43,280 application for new landscaping within 3020 02:01:41,599 --> 02:01:47,520 the public right away for the property 3021 02:01:43,280 --> 02:01:49,840 at 47 West Shore Road. 3022 02:01:47,520 --> 02:01:51,199 On April 21st of this year, the planning 3023 02:01:49,840 --> 02:01:53,440 commission granted design review 3024 02:01:51,199 --> 02:01:55,520 approval for a residential remodel, deck 3025 02:01:53,440 --> 02:01:59,119 enlargement, and landscaping. The 3026 02:01:55,520 --> 02:02:02,159 project proposed new landscaping and 3027 02:01:59,119 --> 02:02:05,520 maintenance of an existing 35 foot wide 3028 02:02:02,159 --> 02:02:08,320 concrete driveway and lawn area, all of 3029 02:02:05,520 --> 02:02:12,760 which encroach approximately 7 ft into 3030 02:02:08,320 --> 02:02:12,760 the Westshore Road rightway. 3031 02:02:14,159 --> 02:02:18,400 Highlighted in yellow, the area with new 3032 02:02:16,000 --> 02:02:20,480 landscaping in the right ofway includes 3033 02:02:18,400 --> 02:02:23,440 two Japanese maple trees listed to grow 3034 02:02:20,480 --> 02:02:26,159 up to 15 feet tall and two fan palms, 3035 02:02:23,440 --> 02:02:28,560 lavender and succulents within a movable 3036 02:02:26,159 --> 02:02:31,040 pre-fabricated metal planter. The 3037 02:02:28,560 --> 02:02:34,159 planter box would be 2 feet tall and 2' 3038 02:02:31,040 --> 02:02:37,560 7 in deep and set approximately 7 ft 3039 02:02:34,159 --> 02:02:37,560 from the sidewalk. 3040 02:02:38,159 --> 02:02:42,480 Uh here the draft revocable license 3041 02:02:40,159 --> 02:02:44,239 exhibit shows the existing and propo 3042 02:02:42,480 --> 02:02:47,840 proposed improvements within the 3043 02:02:44,239 --> 02:02:49,280 rightway shaded. The driveway and lawn 3044 02:02:47,840 --> 02:02:52,280 highlighted in yellow would not be 3045 02:02:49,280 --> 02:02:52,280 modified 3046 02:02:53,199 --> 02:02:58,080 for council's consideration. The 3047 02:02:55,599 --> 02:02:59,679 proposed planners have been revised 3048 02:02:58,080 --> 02:03:01,840 since the planning commission approval 3049 02:02:59,679 --> 02:03:04,320 in April. At the planning commission 3050 02:03:01,840 --> 02:03:05,840 chair's request, the applicant revise 3051 02:03:04,320 --> 02:03:07,599 the planners in the rightway to be 3052 02:03:05,840 --> 02:03:10,599 movable rather than permanent and 3053 02:03:07,599 --> 02:03:10,599 concrete. 3054 02:03:11,760 --> 02:03:15,440 So staff recommends that the findings 3055 02:03:13,760 --> 02:03:17,520 for the revocable license can be made as 3056 02:03:15,440 --> 02:03:19,440 the project benefits the public. The 3057 02:03:17,520 --> 02:03:22,000 existing driveway permits two off 3058 02:03:19,440 --> 02:03:23,679 streetet parking spaces uh and then the 3059 02:03:22,000 --> 02:03:25,440 planter enhances the aesthetic quality 3060 02:03:23,679 --> 02:03:28,159 of the streetscape without placing a 3061 02:03:25,440 --> 02:03:29,679 permanent structure in the right way. 3062 02:03:28,159 --> 02:03:31,360 Thank you. And we're happy to answer any 3063 02:03:29,679 --> 02:03:32,880 questions. 3064 02:03:31,360 --> 02:03:33,440 » Do council members have questions for 3065 02:03:32,880 --> 02:03:35,599 Sammy? 3066 02:03:33,440 --> 02:03:36,000 » I have two quick questions for Sammy. Go 3067 02:03:35,599 --> 02:03:39,840 ahead. 3068 02:03:36,000 --> 02:03:41,599 » Um the grass area that's on the um right 3069 02:03:39,840 --> 02:03:44,800 side of the driveway, it's going to 3070 02:03:41,599 --> 02:03:46,400 remain a grassy area, but it's in pretty 3071 02:03:44,800 --> 02:03:50,320 poor shape. Are they going to be 3072 02:03:46,400 --> 02:03:52,080 replanting that or putting in new 3073 02:03:50,320 --> 02:03:53,920 seeds to get something growing because 3074 02:03:52,080 --> 02:03:57,040 it's pretty brown? 3075 02:03:53,920 --> 02:03:59,520 » Right. This is the here is the landscape 3076 02:03:57,040 --> 02:04:02,080 plan right now. It's just uh to be 3077 02:03:59,520 --> 02:04:05,080 maintained as as a lawn area at this 3078 02:04:02,080 --> 02:04:05,080 time. 3079 02:04:05,280 --> 02:04:10,560 Okay. Because doesn't look very good. It 3080 02:04:07,679 --> 02:04:12,480 would be nice if they replace that. Um 3081 02:04:10,560 --> 02:04:14,159 the other thing is is I don't have a 3082 02:04:12,480 --> 02:04:16,480 problem with any of this. It's great 3083 02:04:14,159 --> 02:04:18,639 they change the planter. The only 3084 02:04:16,480 --> 02:04:23,760 question I have was is when I looked at 3085 02:04:18,639 --> 02:04:27,119 the European um fan palm that um it's 3086 02:04:23,760 --> 02:04:30,239 considered not totally 3087 02:04:27,119 --> 02:04:32,639 allowed by the fire district. However, 3088 02:04:30,239 --> 02:04:37,199 it's not recommended 3089 02:04:32,639 --> 02:04:39,360 um and that if it is planted that it has 3090 02:04:37,199 --> 02:04:42,080 certain restrictions. 3091 02:04:39,360 --> 02:04:45,599 And I just wonder um since it's not 3092 02:04:42,080 --> 02:04:48,239 supposed to be within so many feet of a 3093 02:04:45,599 --> 02:04:53,360 fence if that is the proper plant for 3094 02:04:48,239 --> 02:04:56,960 that um if that has been looked at um 3095 02:04:53,360 --> 02:04:59,599 as a proper plant for that um location. 3096 02:04:56,960 --> 02:05:02,239 That was my only question. um because 3097 02:04:59,599 --> 02:05:04,239 they had several recommendations of how 3098 02:05:02,239 --> 02:05:07,920 they would have to maintain those uh 3099 02:05:04,239 --> 02:05:10,560 European ponds, palm trees because of 3100 02:05:07,920 --> 02:05:12,400 their fonds. 3101 02:05:10,560 --> 02:05:14,800 » That that's a good great point. I don't 3102 02:05:12,400 --> 02:05:17,040 know that the architect knew about that 3103 02:05:14,800 --> 02:05:18,080 consideration as well. She's here with 3104 02:05:17,040 --> 02:05:19,760 us tonight. 3105 02:05:18,080 --> 02:05:21,440 » Well, I mean I just think that that 3106 02:05:19,760 --> 02:05:23,199 should be looked at. I mean I don't have 3107 02:05:21,440 --> 02:05:26,000 any problem with the RL at all. It's 3108 02:05:23,199 --> 02:05:28,000 just my concern was is I don't think we 3109 02:05:26,000 --> 02:05:30,639 want to they they should be aware of 3110 02:05:28,000 --> 02:05:33,679 what the requirements are because we 3111 02:05:30,639 --> 02:05:36,560 don't want to recommend something that 3112 02:05:33,679 --> 02:05:40,960 is um 3113 02:05:36,560 --> 02:05:44,199 a potential fire um issue. 3114 02:05:40,960 --> 02:05:44,199 That's it. 3115 02:05:45,360 --> 02:05:51,280 Any other questions? No. Uh let's open 3116 02:05:48,000 --> 02:05:53,199 public comment 3117 02:05:51,280 --> 02:05:55,119 » There. No hands raised. Great. So, I'll 3118 02:05:53,199 --> 02:05:57,199 bring this back for discussion or a 3119 02:05:55,119 --> 02:06:00,080 motion. 3120 02:05:57,199 --> 02:06:02,800 Anybody want to go first? Jane, 3121 02:06:00,080 --> 02:06:04,159 » I'm happy to make a motion unless 3122 02:06:02,800 --> 02:06:05,199 somebody wants to discuss. 3123 02:06:04,159 --> 02:06:06,480 » Oh, 3124 02:06:05,199 --> 02:06:07,199 » Go ahead. You do it. 3125 02:06:06,480 --> 02:06:09,199 » No, I'm good. 3126 02:06:07,199 --> 02:06:12,880 » Oh, only uh just one quick comment. I I 3127 02:06:09,199 --> 02:06:14,400 do think and this is now I guess uh 3128 02:06:12,880 --> 02:06:17,199 seven on the agenda where I can propose 3129 02:06:14,400 --> 02:06:20,880 this, but I mean I I think moving the 3130 02:06:17,199 --> 02:06:22,400 planters to um movable versus permanent 3131 02:06:20,880 --> 02:06:25,840 makes me more comfortable. I'm just 3132 02:06:22,400 --> 02:06:28,639 trying to find um what is our consistent 3133 02:06:25,840 --> 02:06:30,079 approach to RLS and what do we allow in 3134 02:06:28,639 --> 02:06:32,400 terms of being built or permanent 3135 02:06:30,079 --> 02:06:34,800 structures versus not. I mean, so I 3136 02:06:32,400 --> 02:06:38,000 think this looks great um visually. Um 3137 02:06:34,800 --> 02:06:40,320 but it is, you know, making city land 3138 02:06:38,000 --> 02:06:41,679 appear to be private land and I I don't 3139 02:06:40,320 --> 02:06:43,520 have an issue with this RL just based on 3140 02:06:41,679 --> 02:06:45,599 what we've approved uh over the course 3141 02:06:43,520 --> 02:06:47,360 of our history as a city. But I do think 3142 02:06:45,599 --> 02:06:49,840 it just raises a question for us to 3143 02:06:47,360 --> 02:06:51,760 figure out how do we better define 3144 02:06:49,840 --> 02:06:54,960 what's acceptable and not acceptable in 3145 02:06:51,760 --> 02:06:56,400 RL's so we can better govern both from a 3146 02:06:54,960 --> 02:06:58,000 planning standpoint and a city council 3147 02:06:56,400 --> 02:07:00,079 standpoint. And when I say better govern 3148 02:06:58,000 --> 02:07:02,560 is just be much more consistent in our 3149 02:07:00,079 --> 02:07:03,920 application. But again, because these 3150 02:07:02,560 --> 02:07:05,280 are movable, I can get comfortable with 3151 02:07:03,920 --> 02:07:07,840 it. If they were permanent, I would say, 3152 02:07:05,280 --> 02:07:11,400 well, no, you can't put a structure in 3153 02:07:07,840 --> 02:07:11,400 um city land. 3154 02:07:12,400 --> 02:07:18,880 » Thank you for the comment, Jane. Okay. 3155 02:07:15,520 --> 02:07:21,440 Uh, I, uh, would like to make the motion 3156 02:07:18,880 --> 02:07:23,280 that we approve the re revocable license 3157 02:07:21,440 --> 02:07:24,880 for existing and proposed private 3158 02:07:23,280 --> 02:07:27,199 improvements in the public rightway 3159 02:07:24,880 --> 02:07:30,079 along Westshore Road for the property at 3160 02:07:27,199 --> 02:07:32,159 47 Westshore Road. 3161 02:07:30,079 --> 02:07:36,040 » Second. All in favor? I. 3162 02:07:32,159 --> 02:07:36,040 » I. Motion passes. 3163 02:07:43,679 --> 02:07:49,199 Okay, we're moving on to item seven, 3164 02:07:46,560 --> 02:07:52,320 which is our new item. Future agenda 3165 02:07:49,199 --> 02:07:53,920 item agenda items. City council shall 3166 02:07:52,320 --> 02:07:55,840 propose and consider items for future 3167 02:07:53,920 --> 02:07:57,520 meetings. City council may refer items 3168 02:07:55,840 --> 02:08:00,000 to staff for further development before 3169 02:07:57,520 --> 02:08:03,280 they appear on a future agenda. Does any 3170 02:08:00,000 --> 02:08:05,040 council member have a suggestion for a 3171 02:08:03,280 --> 02:08:06,800 future 3172 02:08:05,040 --> 02:08:12,520 Kevin? Go for it. 3173 02:08:06,800 --> 02:08:12,520 » Oh, what would it be? um RL's 3174 02:08:13,280 --> 02:08:18,480 I do think it's appropriate for us and I 3175 02:08:15,520 --> 02:08:20,400 I think we can be um thoughtful about 3176 02:08:18,480 --> 02:08:23,199 managing the timing of this but I think 3177 02:08:20,400 --> 02:08:26,800 bringing RL's to the council would be a 3178 02:08:23,199 --> 02:08:30,159 very uh helpful and productive um 3179 02:08:26,800 --> 02:08:32,800 process. Uh, second, if I can nominate 3180 02:08:30,159 --> 02:08:38,040 two, I would like to get the tree 3181 02:08:32,800 --> 02:08:38,040 ordinance to the council this year. 3182 02:08:38,480 --> 02:08:44,560 » Um, 3183 02:08:40,320 --> 02:08:46,159 do do I have to to get a vote to to 3184 02:08:44,560 --> 02:08:49,159 accept these things as future agenda 3185 02:08:46,159 --> 02:08:49,159 items? 3186 02:08:53,920 --> 02:08:57,440 » So, I've got some general comments. 3187 02:08:56,800 --> 02:08:58,719 Okay, 3188 02:08:57,440 --> 02:09:01,440 » Some general comments. I think it might 3189 02:08:58,719 --> 02:09:03,199 be helpful if I read those out. Um I 3190 02:09:01,440 --> 02:09:05,920 just how we look at this item and how we 3191 02:09:03,199 --> 02:09:08,000 use it in the future. Any council member 3192 02:09:05,920 --> 02:09:09,920 can suggest a future agenda item. 3193 02:09:08,000 --> 02:09:11,840 However, requests requiring more than 3194 02:09:09,920 --> 02:09:14,400 minimal staff time, research, and 3195 02:09:11,840 --> 02:09:16,159 preparation of a future staff report 3196 02:09:14,400 --> 02:09:18,960 should generally reflect the direction 3197 02:09:16,159 --> 02:09:20,960 of the majority of council. So if that's 3198 02:09:18,960 --> 02:09:23,440 the case, I think these I think it would 3199 02:09:20,960 --> 02:09:25,040 be helpful. Um certainly if there's you 3200 02:09:23,440 --> 02:09:27,599 know a difference in opinions to 3201 02:09:25,040 --> 02:09:30,239 memorialize that. Um and then just from 3202 02:09:27,599 --> 02:09:31,760 a Brown Act perspective too I think we 3203 02:09:30,239 --> 02:09:33,440 should limit the discussion to 3204 02:09:31,760 --> 02:09:35,440 identifying the topic and determining 3205 02:09:33,440 --> 02:09:36,880 whether consideration is warranted 3206 02:09:35,440 --> 02:09:38,079 rather than deliberating on the merits 3207 02:09:36,880 --> 02:09:39,440 of the issue. Not that we've done that 3208 02:09:38,079 --> 02:09:41,520 tonight but just a reminder. 3209 02:09:39,440 --> 02:09:43,040 » Okay. So can I ask um just a follow-up 3210 02:09:41,520 --> 02:09:45,760 question to the staff that would be 3211 02:09:43,040 --> 02:09:47,760 handling these two items within all of 3212 02:09:45,760 --> 02:09:51,199 the work that you currently have on your 3213 02:09:47,760 --> 02:09:53,440 plates? Um, is this these two items 3214 02:09:51,199 --> 02:09:54,960 something that you could be considering 3215 02:09:53,440 --> 02:09:57,960 during the remainder of this calendar 3216 02:09:54,960 --> 02:09:57,960 year? 3217 02:09:58,320 --> 02:10:02,800 » Well, the the tree ordinance itself, I 3218 02:10:00,239 --> 02:10:04,639 know we spent some already considerable 3219 02:10:02,800 --> 02:10:06,320 amount of time prepping that and getting 3220 02:10:04,639 --> 02:10:08,239 it ready. I think there's maybe with the 3221 02:10:06,320 --> 02:10:10,400 exception of one section less work on 3222 02:10:08,239 --> 02:10:10,719 that one. RLS is a big discussion, 3223 02:10:10,400 --> 02:10:12,800 » Right? 3224 02:10:10,719 --> 02:10:14,800 » Um, and I'll defer to Rebecca on where 3225 02:10:12,800 --> 02:10:16,239 we want to fit that in. Maybe it's a 3226 02:10:14,800 --> 02:10:16,960 question we can bring back to next 3227 02:10:16,239 --> 02:10:19,040 meeting, 3228 02:10:16,960 --> 02:10:22,000 » Right? Because meaning do you want to 3229 02:10:19,040 --> 02:10:24,320 pump this to next year as a sort of key 3230 02:10:22,000 --> 02:10:25,679 item that the city council agrees at the 3231 02:10:24,320 --> 02:10:28,159 council retreat or you feel like you 3232 02:10:25,679 --> 02:10:29,840 have the bandwidth this year to be 3233 02:10:28,159 --> 02:10:32,000 working potentially with a council 3234 02:10:29,840 --> 02:10:33,679 member or two council members on this on 3235 02:10:32,000 --> 02:10:35,520 this question? 3236 02:10:33,679 --> 02:10:37,440 » I think although the tree ordinance has 3237 02:10:35,520 --> 02:10:39,760 been looked at in the past, it needs a 3238 02:10:37,440 --> 02:10:42,159 lot of work because trees go through 3239 02:10:39,760 --> 02:10:46,079 chapter 20, chapter 3240 02:10:42,159 --> 02:10:48,960 8 and chapter 19. Okay. 3241 02:10:46,079 --> 02:10:52,159 » So, to answer your question briefly, 3242 02:10:48,960 --> 02:10:54,480 within the next calendar year, yes, the 3243 02:10:52,159 --> 02:10:54,800 trees, I think, should come back. 3244 02:10:54,480 --> 02:10:57,360 » Okay. 3245 02:10:54,800 --> 02:10:59,920 » Um, it's been a long time coming. Uh, 3246 02:10:57,360 --> 02:11:02,400 and the RL's, 3247 02:10:59,920 --> 02:11:04,560 I guess I would need more direction from 3248 02:11:02,400 --> 02:11:06,159 a council member on exactly what you're 3249 02:11:04,560 --> 02:11:08,639 looking for. We have a lot of history 3250 02:11:06,159 --> 02:11:12,639 here, I think, of RL reports that have 3251 02:11:08,639 --> 02:11:14,719 come to council. So, 3252 02:11:12,639 --> 02:11:16,560 » I think with a little more direction. 3253 02:11:14,719 --> 02:11:18,239 Yeah, I mean what I mean and with 3254 02:11:16,560 --> 02:11:20,400 Robert's further context, I would 3255 02:11:18,239 --> 02:11:21,920 absolutely put the RL I didn't realize 3256 02:11:20,400 --> 02:11:23,199 about the tree ordinance. So maybe now I 3257 02:11:21,920 --> 02:11:25,920 would put both of them in the category 3258 02:11:23,199 --> 02:11:28,560 of requiring a bit of a heavy lift from 3259 02:11:25,920 --> 02:11:31,280 staff. And so this isn't something I 3260 02:11:28,560 --> 02:11:33,440 mean the RL if we're already in July, we 3261 02:11:31,280 --> 02:11:35,360 may not meet in August. That leaves 3262 02:11:33,440 --> 02:11:38,719 Yeah, I mean it's unlikely for this to 3263 02:11:35,360 --> 02:11:41,760 come this year. Then I would probably 3264 02:11:38,719 --> 02:11:43,280 put it as a key item to discuss on the 3265 02:11:41,760 --> 02:11:45,280 at the retreat next year and we could 3266 02:11:43,280 --> 02:11:47,520 decide you know when we could get it 3267 02:11:45,280 --> 02:11:49,280 next year if it's a priority 3268 02:11:47,520 --> 02:11:50,960 » And define scope because we would be 3269 02:11:49,280 --> 02:11:51,199 able to discuss that in more depth at 3270 02:11:50,960 --> 02:11:52,560 that point 3271 02:11:51,199 --> 02:11:54,560 » But it is a it's a it's a meaty topic 3272 02:11:52,560 --> 02:11:56,719 the RL in particular and I think it is 3273 02:11:54,560 --> 02:12:00,000 going to require quite a bit of work 3274 02:11:56,719 --> 02:12:02,719 » Okay so and I would suggest that the RL 3275 02:12:00,000 --> 02:12:05,119 also we have to remember encompasses 3276 02:12:02,719 --> 02:12:08,239 different aspects of the whole community 3277 02:12:05,119 --> 02:12:10,639 and certainly we've asked parks open 3278 02:12:08,239 --> 02:12:14,159 space and lane to collect information 3279 02:12:10,639 --> 02:12:16,239 along this strip for all the RLS So I 3280 02:12:14,159 --> 02:12:18,239 think all that would fold into it and 3281 02:12:16,239 --> 02:12:19,840 they were planning on coming back in 3282 02:12:18,239 --> 02:12:22,639 December I think 3283 02:12:19,840 --> 02:12:24,159 » And so I think pushing it would work 3284 02:12:22,639 --> 02:12:26,159 because then it would fit with what 3285 02:12:24,159 --> 02:12:27,599 we've already asked parks open space and 3286 02:12:26,159 --> 02:12:30,000 lane to do 3287 02:12:27,599 --> 02:12:32,320 » Is so I think that's a great suggestion 3288 02:12:30,000 --> 02:12:34,880 Kevin and so I think we you know already 3289 02:12:32,320 --> 02:12:37,199 if in terms of the council retreat that 3290 02:12:34,880 --> 02:12:39,760 those will be two items for discussion 3291 02:12:37,199 --> 02:12:43,079 and Kevin will be mayor and he can lead 3292 02:12:39,760 --> 02:12:43,079 all of that. 3293 02:12:44,560 --> 02:12:50,400 Okay. Are there any other future agenda 3294 02:12:48,000 --> 02:12:52,159 items that anybody would like to raise? 3295 02:12:50,400 --> 02:12:54,639 » Everything on my list will be considered 3296 02:12:52,159 --> 02:12:58,880 a heavy lift. 3297 02:12:54,639 --> 02:13:02,320 » You can raise it and we can 3298 02:12:58,880 --> 02:13:03,760 » Very you want to go down that road. Um 3299 02:13:02,320 --> 02:13:06,560 » Beyond those two, are there other items 3300 02:13:03,760 --> 02:13:09,199 that you just want to flag? 3301 02:13:06,560 --> 02:13:12,480 » So, do you want to Okay. So, um it would 3302 02:13:09,199 --> 02:13:16,480 be good to know on our housing element 3303 02:13:12,480 --> 02:13:20,800 um what progress we're making on our HCD 3304 02:13:16,480 --> 02:13:23,920 um requirements such as our policies and 3305 02:13:20,800 --> 02:13:26,480 goals, but that also encompasses a lot 3306 02:13:23,920 --> 02:13:31,040 of uh code changes 3307 02:13:26,480 --> 02:13:34,000 um clean up and um in our in our code 3308 02:13:31,040 --> 02:13:36,400 and additions. Um 3309 02:13:34,000 --> 02:13:39,920 that's two. I can go to three. I think 3310 02:13:36,400 --> 02:13:42,960 we need a new 3311 02:13:39,920 --> 02:13:47,040 section in our municipal code that deals 3312 02:13:42,960 --> 02:13:51,280 with um development 3313 02:13:47,040 --> 02:13:53,679 and how developments like 3314 02:13:51,280 --> 02:13:59,360 um future developments 3315 02:13:53,679 --> 02:14:05,040 um um in our R2 and R3 zone um andor 3316 02:13:59,360 --> 02:14:09,880 municipal or municipal code um mixed use 3317 02:14:05,040 --> 02:14:09,880 um just because I think we 3318 02:14:10,239 --> 02:14:16,719 a code that specifically deals with 3319 02:14:13,760 --> 02:14:19,040 development that doesn't fit into our 3320 02:14:16,719 --> 02:14:21,920 normal code and I think that's become 3321 02:14:19,040 --> 02:14:23,679 evident in Malard Point that there's 3322 02:14:21,920 --> 02:14:25,360 processes there that are different than 3323 02:14:23,679 --> 02:14:28,320 what we normally do and I think we need 3324 02:14:25,360 --> 02:14:31,040 to codify something um and that's a 3325 02:14:28,320 --> 02:14:32,639 really super duper heavyduty lift but I 3326 02:14:31,040 --> 02:14:36,159 think it's something that needs to be 3327 02:14:32,639 --> 02:14:38,719 addressed sooner versus later So that as 3328 02:14:36,159 --> 02:14:40,960 we get future development, which will be 3329 02:14:38,719 --> 02:14:42,800 coming, that we do have something 3330 02:14:40,960 --> 02:14:44,560 codified that addresses some of the 3331 02:14:42,800 --> 02:14:47,840 things that we've learned from Malard 3332 02:14:44,560 --> 02:14:51,360 Point that we should be putting into a 3333 02:14:47,840 --> 02:14:53,119 development code so that it's easier for 3334 02:14:51,360 --> 02:14:56,320 the community, it's easier for the 3335 02:14:53,119 --> 02:14:59,199 developer, and it's easier for staff. 3336 02:14:56,320 --> 02:15:02,079 So, um, I just think there needs to be 3337 02:14:59,199 --> 02:15:04,880 an injection into the municipal code to 3338 02:15:02,079 --> 02:15:06,639 to deal with that. And that that I admit 3339 02:15:04,880 --> 02:15:08,239 it's a very heavy lift, but I think it's 3340 02:15:06,639 --> 02:15:10,960 really important. It needs to be 3341 02:15:08,239 --> 02:15:13,199 something we address sooner versus later 3342 02:15:10,960 --> 02:15:17,119 because we are going to get developments 3343 02:15:13,199 --> 02:15:21,040 again. And I think that um 3344 02:15:17,119 --> 02:15:23,840 um we can definitely um use what we've 3345 02:15:21,040 --> 02:15:25,920 learned over the last several years and 3346 02:15:23,840 --> 02:15:30,119 put it in so that it's a smoother 3347 02:15:25,920 --> 02:15:30,119 process for everybody involved. 3348 02:15:30,960 --> 02:15:35,000 Are you talking about like 3349 02:15:36,480 --> 02:15:40,639 I understand sort of the key takeaways 3350 02:15:38,480 --> 02:15:43,199 or learning you know things we've 3351 02:15:40,639 --> 02:15:46,480 learned from Malard but are you asking 3352 02:15:43,199 --> 02:15:48,480 for like a revision of the R2 and R3 in 3353 02:15:46,480 --> 02:15:51,360 terms of the zoning ordinance or are you 3354 02:15:48,480 --> 02:15:52,880 saying like all multifamily developments 3355 02:15:51,360 --> 02:15:54,960 » Are required to have a development 3356 02:15:52,880 --> 02:15:57,040 agreement? Here's an example of a 3357 02:15:54,960 --> 02:15:59,280 development agreement or can you give me 3358 02:15:57,040 --> 02:16:00,480 an example of what you mean by 3359 02:15:59,280 --> 02:16:02,239 » Sure. like um 3360 02:16:00,480 --> 02:16:06,079 » Development section of the code. 3361 02:16:02,239 --> 02:16:08,719 » So, normally our process is you're 3362 02:16:06,079 --> 02:16:11,599 building tearing something down and 3363 02:16:08,719 --> 02:16:14,159 building a new structure. You get one 3364 02:16:11,599 --> 02:16:15,920 permit with everything in it. Now, with 3365 02:16:14,159 --> 02:16:17,440 a development, 3366 02:16:15,920 --> 02:16:19,360 you 3367 02:16:17,440 --> 02:16:22,000 might want to have something in there 3368 02:16:19,360 --> 02:16:26,880 that breaks up that process and is more 3369 02:16:22,000 --> 02:16:30,639 clear on how it can proceed through not 3370 02:16:26,880 --> 02:16:32,399 so much the um 3371 02:16:30,639 --> 02:16:34,399 planning process. Well, it would help 3372 02:16:32,399 --> 02:16:35,840 with the conditions of approval. So it 3373 02:16:34,399 --> 02:16:38,080 would be kind of with the planning 3374 02:16:35,840 --> 02:16:41,760 process but also how it's going to 3375 02:16:38,080 --> 02:16:44,719 proceed through into entitlement so that 3376 02:16:41,760 --> 02:16:48,880 it's it's it's a clearer process that 3377 02:16:44,719 --> 02:16:52,319 you know there could be a demo permit 3378 02:16:48,880 --> 02:16:56,439 given before you have your building 3379 02:16:52,319 --> 02:16:56,439 permit because 3380 02:16:57,120 --> 02:17:02,080 they need to demo it and then they need 3381 02:16:58,960 --> 02:17:04,160 to do their uh improvement plan i.e. 3382 02:17:02,080 --> 02:17:06,080 infrastructure and then they're going to 3383 02:17:04,160 --> 02:17:08,960 do their their building plan. So, this 3384 02:17:06,080 --> 02:17:13,599 first process is over here and then the 3385 02:17:08,960 --> 02:17:20,399 next process is there. Um I think um 3386 02:17:13,599 --> 02:17:26,479 having things in there such as um uh u 3387 02:17:20,399 --> 02:17:29,359 bonds um that would uh need to be um 3388 02:17:26,479 --> 02:17:31,359 required. Uh, I don't know if we need a 3389 02:17:29,359 --> 02:17:34,319 user fee study for something like that 3390 02:17:31,359 --> 02:17:36,399 to include that in a user fee update. 3391 02:17:34,319 --> 02:17:41,280 Um, I just think that some of the things 3392 02:17:36,399 --> 02:17:43,280 could be um a little clearer um and make 3393 02:17:41,280 --> 02:17:45,439 the process easier for everyone to 3394 02:17:43,280 --> 02:17:47,679 understand going forward because I mean 3395 02:17:45,439 --> 02:17:51,040 there is going to be further development 3396 02:17:47,679 --> 02:17:54,800 and our our code I think is primarily 3397 02:17:51,040 --> 02:17:58,800 written for single family homes and 3398 02:17:54,800 --> 02:18:00,399 duplexes there. it's not um taking into 3399 02:17:58,800 --> 02:18:03,280 consideration 3400 02:18:00,399 --> 02:18:07,760 larger projects that could come forward 3401 02:18:03,280 --> 02:18:10,240 and um I mean there's um uh for instance 3402 02:18:07,760 --> 02:18:12,240 there's some communities out there that 3403 02:18:10,240 --> 02:18:15,120 have a strict process they have to 3404 02:18:12,240 --> 02:18:18,639 follow on the uh improvement plans and 3405 02:18:15,120 --> 02:18:20,559 that's all outlined um in in the 3406 02:18:18,639 --> 02:18:22,479 municipal code of if you want to get 3407 02:18:20,559 --> 02:18:26,319 your improvement plans you have to you 3408 02:18:22,479 --> 02:18:29,120 know DPW says ABC and then so and Alo 3409 02:18:26,319 --> 02:18:30,639 says you have to do EFG and then finally 3410 02:18:29,120 --> 02:18:32,080 you get to the point where you can get 3411 02:18:30,639 --> 02:18:35,120 your improvement plan. So I think we 3412 02:18:32,080 --> 02:18:37,120 just need to look at how other cities 3413 02:18:35,120 --> 02:18:39,599 handle these 3414 02:18:37,120 --> 02:18:41,840 even though people don't consider it big 3415 02:18:39,599 --> 02:18:44,479 development what we get in Belvadier to 3416 02:18:41,840 --> 02:18:46,479 us it is big development and I just 3417 02:18:44,479 --> 02:18:49,280 think that if there is a section that 3418 02:18:46,479 --> 02:18:51,840 addresses some of these issues that it 3419 02:18:49,280 --> 02:18:54,800 just would make it easier for everybody 3420 02:18:51,840 --> 02:18:57,519 involved for yourself for the community 3421 02:18:54,800 --> 02:18:59,200 for the developer um just to have 3422 02:18:57,519 --> 02:19:01,200 everything kind of spelled out a little 3423 02:18:59,200 --> 02:19:05,679 clearer because our code doesn't really 3424 02:19:01,200 --> 02:19:10,559 go into major um redevelopment. Um it we 3425 02:19:05,679 --> 02:19:12,160 haven't had it in 60 70 years and so we 3426 02:19:10,559 --> 02:19:14,479 never addressed it because it was like 3427 02:19:12,160 --> 02:19:17,200 who was going to build a duplex? Well, 3428 02:19:14,479 --> 02:19:19,840 now we do have that. So I just think 3429 02:19:17,200 --> 02:19:22,160 that we need to consider that kind of 3430 02:19:19,840 --> 02:19:24,319 addition to our code 3431 02:19:22,160 --> 02:19:28,639 so that it's a better process for 3432 02:19:24,319 --> 02:19:31,439 everybody all the way around. 3433 02:19:28,639 --> 02:19:32,639 » Okay. Um, everybody seems to be in 3434 02:19:31,439 --> 02:19:34,160 agreement with that. Rebecca, I'm 3435 02:19:32,639 --> 02:19:35,120 assuming again that that's a giant lift 3436 02:19:34,160 --> 02:19:37,280 and this is something that will be 3437 02:19:35,120 --> 02:19:37,679 pushed into 2027. 3438 02:19:37,280 --> 02:19:38,399 » Okay. 3439 02:19:37,679 --> 02:19:40,000 » Yeah. 3440 02:19:38,399 --> 02:19:41,280 » Okay. 3441 02:19:40,000 --> 02:19:43,040 » Right. 3442 02:19:41,280 --> 02:19:46,399 » Uh, or eight. 3443 02:19:43,040 --> 02:19:48,640 » Exactly. Or in 2029 or whatever it is. 3444 02:19:46,399 --> 02:19:49,920 Okay. Unless are there any other 3445 02:19:48,640 --> 02:19:51,280 suggestions? I guess we have to open 3446 02:19:49,920 --> 02:19:53,120 this for public comment. Is that right, 3447 02:19:51,280 --> 02:19:53,760 Beth? 3448 02:19:53,120 --> 02:19:55,120 » That is it. 3449 02:19:53,760 --> 02:19:56,960 » There is no public comment. 3450 02:19:55,120 --> 02:19:59,120 » Okay. Unless there's further discussion, 3451 02:19:56,960 --> 02:20:03,120 I think we can close item seven and move 3452 02:19:59,120 --> 02:20:04,880 to item eight, which is our open forum. 3453 02:20:03,120 --> 02:20:06,640 This is an opportunity for any member of 3454 02:20:04,880 --> 02:20:08,319 the public to briefly address the city 3455 02:20:06,640 --> 02:20:09,920 council on any matter that does not 3456 02:20:08,319 --> 02:20:11,600 appear on this agenda, but that is 3457 02:20:09,920 --> 02:20:13,760 within the city council's subject matter 3458 02:20:11,600 --> 02:20:15,359 jurisdiction. Upon being recognized by 3459 02:20:13,760 --> 02:20:16,800 the mayor, please limit your statement 3460 02:20:15,359 --> 02:20:18,240 to no more than 3 minutes. Under the 3461 02:20:16,800 --> 02:20:21,520 Brown Act, council members may not 3462 02:20:18,240 --> 02:20:23,439 deliberate or t take action on this item 3463 02:20:21,520 --> 02:20:24,960 on an item not on tonight's agenda. 3464 02:20:23,439 --> 02:20:26,880 Matters that may warrant a more lengthy 3465 02:20:24,960 --> 02:20:29,520 presentation or council consideration 3466 02:20:26,880 --> 02:20:32,479 may be placed on the agenda for further 3467 02:20:29,520 --> 02:20:33,920 discussion at a later meeting. 3468 02:20:32,479 --> 02:20:36,479 » There are no hands raised. 3469 02:20:33,920 --> 02:20:39,479 » Okay, with that we can adjourn. Good 3470 02:20:36,479 --> 02:20:39,479 night.