[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[5:02] Thank you all for that.
[5:12] Okay, I'm not saying that I'm going to do it.
[5:44] I'm just going to vote on the city's website for section 4.04.030. Say, in each, so, the other ordinance, option, agenda, we have a motion to adopt the agenda.
[6:02] So, the
[6:05] motion to commission our line, I'll say, a motion to build the pace, staff, please follow.
[6:14] Mr. Warren,
[6:25] Yes.
[6:30] Yes.
[6:32] Mr. Rarco.
[6:33] Yes.
[6:34] Yes.
[6:36] Thank you.
[6:38] This portion of the region is reserved for verses which you
[6:41] address the commissioner.
[6:43] Question on any matter not only agenda is within this other
[6:47] jurisdiction on the banking issue, say a lot of what's the
[6:50] admission from the stockings to or acting plummeters on the
[6:53] stockings agenda. Each speaker has an accent with
[6:57] Freemants or public comment. If others have already expressed
[7:01] their position, they can clearly agree with the previous
[7:04] speaker. If we've always spoken and made this the
[7:09] views to the entire group, speakers may not make personal
[7:13] not tax council members or public as members of the public or make comments which are
[7:20] standards or which are being made in the visuals version of our policy.
[7:25] If you are a remote participant in a live made public comment please raise your hand
[7:30] now as there's a 10-7 to live. If you're participating in the personal logic in a public
[7:35] comment. Please come to the committee. We are on the line.
[7:43] We do not
[8:03] want to sign
[8:09] some
[8:09] commission members of the public wish to speak on the item. On the
[8:21] sign, I have an
[8:22] The motion will be commissioned.
[8:26] So,
[8:33] the motion will be commissioned a while in a second.
[8:35] You should be given an A's.
[8:37] Sat, please, all.
[8:40] Commissioner Catton.
[8:45] Commissioner Catton.
[8:51] Yes.
[8:53] Thank you.
[8:54] Commissioner Gilfen-Hays.
[8:56] Yes.
[8:57] Commissioner Gorman.
[9:04] Commissioner Lyle.
[9:06] Yes.
[9:07] Commissioner Marshall.
[9:10] Yes.
[9:11] Acting Chair Slate.
[9:13] Yes. Thank you.
[9:21] As a reminder, members of the planning and commission should share certain
[9:24] information that is relevant to the matter when you consider the commission.
[9:29] If that information wasn't received outside of the decision process,
[9:40] it would have had some of them.
[9:46] Yes, then you could be in the vice chair sleep.
[9:48] I know there was a point in the issue.
[9:50] I know in the case you made, it's explaining the issue.
[9:53] Today, I'm joining my art consultant, Emil, so I'm not going to see his approach to your
[9:58] or how you know that...
[10:21] Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you.
[10:24] not this year. So this point all 13 over to us now, to give the
[10:30] acquisition.
[11:34] to go with a particular view.
[11:37] This is an informational item
[11:39] when we're getting you a preview.
[11:41] So, we could amendments that may come before you,
[11:44] later this year, if you consider
[11:46] and make a recommendation to the Senate House.
[11:50] Next up, please.
[11:57] So, as you know, in 2024,
[12:00] the city adopted this housing moment.
[12:03] We should serve by the state
[12:04] and hasn't been identified as a number of programs that need to be accomplished each year,
[12:11] including a number of zoning prohibit events that need to be completed in 2025.
[12:19] Those zoning code events are important because in order to remain
[12:23] in compliance with the SAE law and attain a certified housing government,
[12:27] the cities can keep these amendments within time for access to housing.
[12:37] So, there are four WCO amendments that are coming before you look at this year to open a housing element.
[12:46] And then there are two others that are not specifically called for housing.
[12:52] on our necessary in order to comply with the state law and address some other issues
[12:59] to the zoning code.
[13:00] So, let me go through that one by one and describe for you what the thing to take to you
[13:07] later this year.
[13:08] So,
[13:11] the first topic is single scan of the residential estate.
[13:16] There's a program in the housing development program, two of those six calls to the city
[13:22] to increase the permitted density up to 15 million
[13:26] that's currently here on sites that are adjacent to mine
[13:29] or are scheduled in the south end of the neighborhood.
[13:33] This city also needs to establish better standards
[13:36] to facilitate maximum densities in those areas.
[13:40] So that's the housing problem.
[13:42] Next slide please.
[13:45] Here's a map you can see it, which identifies the parcels
[13:51] where this program applies.
[13:54] So the parcels that are above minor materials
[13:58] in Southampton, New England.
[14:00] So the housing or the zoning code
[14:03] in this would be specifically applied
[14:05] to these parcels, and inside of this.
[14:11] So to adjust this program, our plan approach
[14:15] is to build on SB9 to allow the increased densities.
[14:21] And we'll also establish more progressive
[14:24] of S-9 standards and the labs are S-9 standards in order to comply with
[14:32] burying from the S-9. As you know, S-9 is a state law that requires all cities in
[14:40] California to allow up to 4-1 units on a single parcel within the S-9. So that's
[14:48] a existing state law that already applies to the needs of other cities and our
[14:54] We are paying a close to address program, GIMMA-6, this is a build on health issues.
[15:01] So,
[15:05] here's a series of documents that illustrate what the city is required to allow under SB 9. So, as I mentioned, on a single family law, the city needs to allow about four governments. And would it be two primary governments, plus a task meeting you or a community?
[15:32] And the rest of the nine was also the possibility for now to be requested and burdened by
[15:39] some of it, which is essentially creating true smaller parcels from that existing single
[15:46] family parcel.
[15:47] Each of those parcels can have up to two units in the year, a primary unit for a second
[15:53] year.
[15:53] So that's really one.
[15:55] Let me talk about this.
[16:00] It is out in the neighborhood.
[16:02] The table called the size of a parcel that's coming to the line
[16:05] or our share of it is about 9,000 sort of heat.
[16:09] And so if you have four long units on 9,000 square feet of parcel,
[16:14] you get a density of about 20 to 20 minutes per acre.
[16:18] So that's about the 15 long units per acre.
[16:21] that program to put out a six calls from the city to a lot of them and therefore that's why we're moving it in direction using S-9 to monitor the program to put out a six.
[16:39] So what our plan is, is to say that on April 1st from the morning, our chair is in South England.
[16:49] to an S-9 project that have additional floor area and additional height if the units
[16:58] complied with the zone in district and in those setbacks, so if facilitated and encouraging
[17:05] S-B-on development by allowing that additional floor area and that additional height.
[17:16] So here's some diagrams that will show under SB 9 state law, an applicant can have a SB 9 unit of up to 16 feet in height and 800 square feet from a new or interior law.
[17:35] So currently, under existing state law, the city is required to allow us for an estimate of the budget.
[17:44] Next slide, please.
[17:47] And our plan with this is to say, okay,
[17:53] what are these parts that are funding the minor or cereal in Southington?
[17:57] If you comply with the minimum setback stat,
[18:00] that apply to single family pounds.
[18:04] You get some additional four area
[18:07] of the 1,000, 250, and so additional height
[18:12] of the 2015.
[18:14] And we think that's a pretty reasonable strategy
[18:17] in order to implement program 2.06,
[18:22] which calls for the city to facilitate development
[18:26] within residential neighborhoods
[18:28] with on-line arterial spines itself is consistent with the existing law and environments.
[18:41] So in addition to modifying some of the SNS standards in order to facilitate these spines
[18:51] on these parcels will also relax some of the RS, the industry standards. Currently there's a
[18:58] maximum of building coverage of 40 percent. That might get in constraint when we have minutes
[19:03] onto the existing parcel. So we're thinking 55 percent would be reasonable numbers to accommodate
[19:10] up to four units. And then also a provision to allow for a key nation or other RS standards.
[19:17] as needed to be able to achieve the greater story of the vast majority of the survey.
[19:25] So all in all, some modifications to the SB9 rules, some modifications to the bar standards for enhanced SB9 product of these parcels.
[19:40] And that's our game plan for program agencies.
[19:44] Thanks a lot.
[19:44] of this. Okay, next topic is view boards. There's a program in the housing on the one-point
[19:52] that calls for the city to update effective standards for a clarification of senior youth.
[20:00] This is the senior wide at the same level of detail as those already adopted in the motion. And the
[20:07] advocate behind this is that currently there are a design review criteria that relate to viewing
[20:14] and blocking the views, but it's very subjective.
[20:18] So the housing moment saw that as a potential constraint
[20:21] to house a production and therefore called the city
[20:25] to establish objective standards for a unit tax
[20:29] and not to rely solely on subjective requirements
[20:32] in design and review violence and assaults.
[20:37] So as you may know, in the multi-family objective standards,
[20:42] There are some specific standards for development and personal dealing with new impacts.
[20:48] There's a number of identified vanish points and specific standards you laid it to potential
[20:53] new impacts.
[20:55] We solve people to develop visible from those vantage points, next slide, please.
[21:02] In those images, photographs that are taken from these different vantage points, that identify
[21:07] features that may not be blocked from you from a new development.
[21:17] We're generally found to have a platform as I think.
[21:29] So the idea of a program analysis is to apply a similar
[21:34] approach to potential human path city law.
[21:38] Which is a really challenging thing to do.
[21:42] It's interesting a lot of cities are looking to establish that.
[21:47] objective standards for public human paths, often that's a very subjective consideration and
[21:55] complicate public approval, if there's an objective human path. And so taking a subjective
[22:02] human path requirement and transitioning it to an objective standard is a relatively simple task,
[22:08] but we're going to accept it. And we're going to identify the important badge points
[22:17] We're going to specify views that need to be protected, which signatures as new for
[22:25] management are important to maintain as visible, and we're going to develop specific objectives
[22:33] standard for review impacts, and then we're also going to specify a real project review process
[22:41] to make sure that we're not creating a new channel to develop the projects and apply
[22:49] anything soon.
[22:50] Let's ask please.
[22:54] And our starting point is the map of existing VISTAs and views in the general climate.
[23:00] This is a very old map and conditions have changed particularly with vegetation that might
[23:06] use, and all of these identify bandage points
[23:10] aren't necessarily the most important.
[23:13] In the city, in terms of iconic public views,
[23:18] so we're going to use this as a starting point,
[23:21] but we're definitely not going to create an objective state
[23:25] or something like that.
[23:28] So here's
[23:33] an example of one bandage point
[23:36] that does happen when I consider a fairly iconic full-of-view of history and the hills across the water.
[23:47] This would be an example of the sort of view that would be important to have the same base.
[23:54] I think it was the intent on the housing development program and the side of this.
[24:00] So in addition to identifying vantage points,
[24:03] We'll also identify what are the protected views,
[24:07] sort of the features that are important to remain
[24:10] uninstructed as views from the advancements.
[24:13] So it's things like this hillside, the water,
[24:17] and maybe in some cases, but also the dissonant views
[24:19] that are featured in the talent as well.
[24:22] It wouldn't be close up buildings that are close to the view,
[24:27] that are close to the management.
[24:29] Those wouldn't fall within our definition
[24:32] in order to attack the view, so we need to establish between the area speeches that are visible from the point of view.
[24:38] Let's start this here.
[25:01] Okay, all right. So then we need to standard itself. And here on the slide, here's an example of what the standard could be. New development, shall not sharp with you, with an incursion of effective view, but a designated punishment.
[25:20] That would be the standard that we were to still work on and think about it. But that would be in details, in terms of what. Some of those would mean. Many comments to actually mention the standard.
[25:36] And so we want to make sure that the process to review those projects is an appropriate
[25:45] and stream-on-one.
[25:47] And so what we need to do is we may identify scenic duchess areas that are visible from these
[25:56] designated edge points.
[25:57] And if a proposed project is not seen in Russia,
[26:03] we determine potential clients in the world.
[26:06] If the project is in the scene in Russia,
[26:10] the criteria might be whether or not the project
[26:13] will extend a line of sight of a protected future from the management.
[26:19] So if the building will be out of sufficient unloadation
[26:22] so that you can get that on sight,
[26:24] I would completely exclude a lot of the potential development, a lot of the development projects
[26:30] in that new shredder.
[26:32] In that case, in the term of positive compliance, if a project would send into the other side,
[26:41] then you might require an applicant to purify our code of simulation to make sure that you
[26:47] approach, similar to the photos simulation that was required for the checks and
[26:52] bridge module. And that photos simulation would be used to determine would the
[26:57] project comply with the standard, whether it is, and if not, the project would be
[27:02] meet to be modified in order to comply with the standard. So that's the plan for
[27:08] the viewing tax. This is an interesting and challenging task to create an
[27:15] objective standard for city-wide use.
[27:20] So we're going to prepare and bring back
[27:22] to you with the rear consideration way to see it.
[27:26] Thanks, all of us.
[27:30] So the next topic is probably straight forward.
[27:32] It's Cessar Ebonius, housing on the Cess,
[27:35] because that every two years, city needs a big ADD ordinance in order to comply with state law.
[27:41] And every year of a legislature, there was about many new requirements that apply to the ADUs.
[27:48] And so there's always something to do to bring the ADD ordinance into compliance.
[27:54] So some
[27:58] of the recent changes to state law include the primary process of clarifying how that works.
[28:03] The rules that apply on-premise that are previously built and now it exists.
[28:09] One of the more significant changes to putting maximum number of 80 used for a lot
[28:14] including maybe used on a lot of multi-parent units.
[28:18] Much higher than with the last couple of years ago.
[28:21] And also clarifying for so-called statewide extension of 80 used how many of those can be used
[28:27] a lot.
[28:41] So, this is sort of a clean up in order to bring the city's A.U. order this into compliance with the state law.
[28:49] Next one.
[28:49] Okay,
[28:53] the next one is a very straightforward one. There's a program 4.08, which says that the city needs to amend the zoning ordinance to say that they not perform non-contemplating multiple residents as a structure that was involved early college community.
[29:11] we can shorten it. And that's how it looks. This can be easily handled with being noticed by simple guidelines too.
[29:19] The government code which contains all of those rules about what about density,
[29:25] can be built back to what are the standards that are called to new students.
[29:29] These are the standards that we need to build the standards now.
[29:33] And then also what cases could the city perpetuate the reconstruction?
[29:39] So that's all about the state law and the code that will grow from that state.
[29:48] Okay,
[29:51] so small lots of divisions visit the zoning code amendment that is not called for by the housing health program.
[30:00] But there have been a couple of recent state laws that address this, and cities have some options in terms of how this law is implemented and applied. So we want to establish a new chapter within the zoning code related to small, uh, some of the issues. And so what the state law side is, is that on parcel that's about eight years or less, that's continuous with existing or not of use. The city must allow the
[30:29] material approval of 10 small parcels and 10 small volume hits as far as it is.
[30:37] And then there are specific rules in the state law that are partial solidized and
[30:41] again solidized, minimal density, parking, setbacks, and other things.
[30:45] The idea is to facilitate more tangible boomer, boomer, boomer ship opportunities in the
[30:51] in the form of a smaller unit on smaller car cells.
[30:58] Here is a diagram that illustrates the intent
[31:01] to have a car cell as relatively small
[31:04] as adjacent to existing urbanize use
[31:06] and can keep your cell up and your multi-carry
[31:09] in its own way, even as a lot of loses.
[31:11] And the idea is to allow for relatively small car cells
[31:15] to be relatively small homes.
[31:17] And as far as we've done,
[31:18] it's fairly happy to have a car in front of the sheep ranch.
[31:22] And so it'd be more of a bum low court or our housing type housing plan to probably have some in each already.
[31:33] The idea behind this is just going to make it easier for housing like this to be built.
[31:38] So like I said, for there are a number of policy options related to this.
[31:46] Cities can allow you to use in addition to the 10 primary moment, but doesn't have to.
[31:53] There's a possibility on the size of the created parcels and there's a possibility on the
[32:00] amount of parking that you can require.
[32:03] So I'm going to come back to you with a form of draft workings.
[32:05] We'll talk about some of these policy options and you can provide a few back.
[32:11] Next slide please.
[32:14] Okay, the last topic is the more organized housing chapter and Suzanne's most excited about
[32:21] this one.
[32:22] which is to take all of the housing log will be content,
[32:28] we've become a lot of it.
[32:31] We put it in one place and all of the other,
[32:33] within the housing chapter,
[32:37] and it will contain things like the EU,
[32:39] the EU earn instance, the homeless,
[32:42] lots of little things like employee housing,
[32:45] emergency shelter, requirements, and so on.
[32:47] as
[32:51] well as some of the new concept of preparing small lots of divisions and the ultimate development
[32:58] in the artist's history. So all of that comes together in one of the places in this area.
[33:04] Thanks a lot, please.
[33:08] So I guess it's a nice more informational item to share with you what you can expect
[33:14] before you later this year.
[33:18] and we expect to have the last amendments
[33:21] at the waiting in August of 2025
[33:25] with plans to have an exhibition
[33:28] where in September of October this year,
[33:31] this also needs to go to the board name's commission,
[33:34] and then after the planning mission documentation,
[33:38] it goes to the city council, the public hearing
[33:42] in October or November of 2025.
[33:46] so our goal is to finish with this set of zoning code
[33:49] in the midst of well before the 2030-25 holiday season.
[33:53] So we're going to start shooting things in the summer.
[33:57] So with that, that concludes my presentation.
[34:22] You'll add a little bit of your savings to the office.
[34:25] There's no available.
[34:34] OK, we'll go to the panel.
[34:36] that the players are in touch with the team in the last, all right, why not?
[34:48] Okay, so then
[34:50] we'll go to public comments this time, we'll invite the public comments, those who participate in
[34:56] I'll tell you what's in your make-on and we'll replace it to the way it burns.
[35:00] Committee, one at a time to speak, participants that have been invited by the phone,
[35:06] a press
[35:07] nine to nominate, start running, zoom, participant space, see the client intent to make a comment
[35:13] by utilizing the raise and the teacher in the participant's window of the Zoom meeting.
[35:18] After you made your comments and meeting moderator would do your audio. If you were to speak in person
[35:56] I don't have a question, as much as I comment, about the view for us.
[36:04] I don't envy you the process of determining which views are going to determine which
[36:20] use are what you need to talk to. I think that that's going to be silly because I can
[36:33] And I want to see the, I was at a summer of New York, kind of a minute and a minute, so I can look back, you know, rare about again.
[36:59] But I can see it kind of being a user,
[37:14] I think
[37:18] you have to do that.
[37:21] Um,
[37:33] there's many other comments I have already.
[37:49] Is there no online?
[37:51] No, there's no one online.
[37:55] Thank you. So this time, close to the comment,
[38:07] I guess the comment is in the comments.
[38:09] I see my sir, I could just fly by just based on the comment we just heard.
[38:14] So just for Friday, for the audience submission, we're asking what we're looking at,
[38:18] equal or is it narrowing then, just look at once again, we have to buy a house in our community site.
[38:24] So it's actually kind of more narrowly, still a lot of exercise that they're in the narrow.
[38:30] And also, if you think about it in terms of geography, along these sides,
[38:35] the view shape will really come into play because it will be screened out by the geography based on what we're talking about.
[38:42] What would be the sort of core of success in the national condition?
[38:45] So just sort of that.
[38:47] Everyone said anything.
[38:48] Thank you.
[38:50] Okay.
[38:51] Okay.
[38:51] Thank
[39:15] you.
[39:20] Okay.
[39:21] All right.
[39:23] One more.
[39:25] Okay.
[39:39] Okay.
[39:40] All right.
[39:44] Again, the name by share.
[39:47] Members of the planning commission staff and members of the public.
[39:52] My name is David talking on.
[39:53] I'm the associate planner with the community development department.
[39:56] Okay.
[39:57] The item before any tonight is the program.
[40:00] Public housing designation application to the California Department of Housing and Community
[40:04] Development, Oregon TV. Staff's recommendation tonight is to accept public comments on the
[40:12] jobs for housing designation application and please know that one formal action is required
[40:18] from the commission on this item this evening. Next slide, this has
[40:28] a quick overview and background
[40:30] the proposed implementation certification program is operated by the city of HCD.
[40:37] The certification documents, the city's commitment to implement both the priorities that remove
[40:44] obstacles to new housing and recognize the city that works in adjacent to the affordable housing.
[40:50] The certification also benefits state grant applicants, city to build a work of housing projects
[40:57] and the city receives priority processing for 20 points when applying for several funding programs
[41:05] including transportation funding.
[41:08] Next slide please.
[41:13] The growth housing designation application consists of five agencies.
[41:19] Next one contains the formal resolution authorizing a jurisdiction to apply for growth housing designation certification.
[41:28] The end is two.
[41:30] It seems that jurisdiction is closed,
[41:33] policy and commission schedule.
[41:35] For as many as three contains the jurisdiction,
[41:38] the project proposal is foreign sheet.
[41:41] The end is four shows examples of investment factors
[41:44] and various processing estimation categories.
[41:48] And lastly, the end is five contains applications
[41:51] for the documentation.
[41:53] And that's why.
[41:54] In
[41:58] addition,
[41:59] There are a certain threshold requirements that need to be met in order to apply for the state's
[42:04] pro-housing designation certification, which includes one certified housing element,
[42:10] which should be obtained in April three to four last year, also facilitating public
[42:16] participation process engagement, compliance with applicable state housing law related to
[42:25] from a shoe on the back and see what, as well as various others, so let's say any comprehensive
[42:31] draft from a housing application.
[42:33] Next slide, please.
[42:38] There are some considerations to keep in mind first is that the City Council action is
[42:44] the entire allocation to the LTSCD.
[42:48] As previously mentioned, the City Council's one resolution is required and is included as
[42:54] and it's one in the application for the growth housing designation.
[42:58] And secondly, there is also an 188-6-8 growth housing designation application review period.
[43:06] Next slide.
[43:09] With regards to public outreach, the City Police noticed that we opened a public review period,
[43:16] or there was not budget second.
[43:18] We had the City's housing element in Elisurth and City definition of the sleep newsletter.
[43:23] as well as we have some immediate
[43:25] goals to do on June 4th.
[43:27] The public review period is still currently open
[43:30] and ends next Wednesday,
[43:32] July 2nd.
[43:33] Okay.
[43:34] Next slide.
[43:38] As of this evening,
[43:39] there's only one public comment
[43:41] made regarding for the passing
[43:43] just in general.
[43:45] Next slide, please.
[43:50] With that,
[43:51] that certain information this evening
[43:53] is to accept
[43:55] public and commission comments
[43:56] some of the draft for housing designation application. And as previously mentioned, you know, the
[44:01] following action is provided for the commission. Next slide.
[44:09] In terms of next steps, staff will consider
[44:12] all public and commission comments and update the draft application as appropriate. Although the
[44:20] presentation of the draft application to City Council was originally anticipated for July 21,
[44:25] to be from one, it has been pushed out to August that side.
[44:37] That includes my presentation for this evening,
[44:41] and I'm happy to answer any questions you have.
[44:45] Thank you.
[44:48] Thank you.
[44:50] Any listeners have any questions?
[45:00] I decided on one way of public comment. Those versus creating public leadership to make comment will be versus the meeting room. And there is one at a time to speak. Participates. That and then my fellow papers, so are nine in the comment. Zoom or suspense, may be seen by intent to make comment by utilizing the various hand feature. In the first instance window, excuse me, have you made public comment. Let me moderate your review audio.
[45:29] and you're participating in first and we're going to make a public comment please send to the podium.
[45:38] Do we have anybody on board?
[45:41] We do not.
[45:42] I
[45:45] will receive any comments after three.
[45:55] Okay.
[45:57] Well, no public comment.
[46:00] So we'll receive the next item.
[46:02] AC.
[46:11] I have to say, I also have to say that the manager can be the director for the city.
[46:16] This is a public hearing on the post and then it's to your Malaysia Municipal Code.
[46:22] The end time is to use MasterClimbs to streamline working leases.
[46:27] Next slide, please.
[46:32] I don't know what you saw in March, although the contents are different.
[46:36] And if I wanted to keep it similar or because it covered a lot of topics,
[46:39] and I thought it might make it easier to track as we move through this process,
[46:44] but I would try not to be repetitive. We've always covered in the facts.
[46:49] This is our third pass that we want to be called right-stage
[46:53] reduction and it's an effort to look at our regulations and make sure that the
[46:59] communities in the exterior in the 2020s. As you recall, the city ever formed its
[47:04] design review procedures in 2023 and then also did some
[47:09] cleanup and streamlining of our summary regulations in 2024.
[47:13] We've created some unnecessary or conflictive
[47:16] apartments and we also addressed the building
[47:21] in downtown to the facility on the top.
[47:24] Next slide, please.
[47:30] So you're seeing that on a lot by speaking to
[47:33] and working with the business community and potential businesses.
[47:37] And then, you know, we also hear from their representatives whether it's the shemer, the
[47:42] Misha, that Cheryl Cremson's decision on real terms, downtown business association.
[47:49] And some of what we hear is very valid, but the only way to address it is actually to change
[47:57] our code.
[47:58] And that's a fairly lengthy process, and also requires quite a lot of commitment in terms of resources
[48:04] to do it. So, as we put together our approach here for these amendments, we really work
[48:11] lots of our online arts experiences over past and over the years, and what we thought
[48:16] would be helpful, make sense for the community and get helpful for these types of businesses.
[48:21] We can outreach to the Chamber of Education, the Research and Federal Emergency Association,
[48:26] the ECMOB Development Board. We do this approach to the City Council, and then, as you
[48:31] were called also conducted a joint meeting with the academic
[48:35] development board in March of this year.
[48:38] Next slide, please.
[48:42] One point out that this set of amendments
[48:44] to our fleet implements the Venetia Resiliency Plan
[48:48] by reducing business expertise within reason,
[48:51] we expected this will encourage businesses to locate
[48:55] the extended variety of Venetia.
[48:58] Next slide, please.
[49:03] I mentioned the prosecution will follow the format
[49:06] but it's now, but it's on the effects of the verbose amendments.
[49:11] This analysis of what is verbose.
[49:14] Next slide please.
[49:16] Let's start with gay care.
[49:18] So the way that the slide that was gathered just to orient you on the left is the online.
[49:25] So gay care is under substitution,
[49:26] conditional and permitting use in any dissidents.
[49:29] And then on the right,
[49:31] it's sort of the details of what we've got those.
[49:34] So, we actually know for many years that there is an even definition remarks about big air.
[49:39] I was looking through our general plan recently, which is in 1999.
[49:43] And one of the background reports had a lot of content about the need to identify this community for the care centers.
[49:52] So, this is a long-standing need for our community and we're hoping that this proposal will hold to address it.
[50:00] The primary motivation behind that for those changes is to stand a number of locations where
[50:08] the care is clearly cited, and also to make them a permitted use of good reason. This is
[50:13] really important because the cost of the use permit and the time permit and the dollars
[50:18] moving through that process is that it's not for many small businesses, and in the V-Shap,
[50:24] most of the cares that we work with are small businesses. So we don't scale our
[50:28] forward to care, and it really affects the visibility about these businesses, especially
[50:33] care with other licensing authority requirements.
[50:38] And I'm going to read everything that's on the
[50:40] slide. I'm going to basically give you a question, but if there are any questions involved,
[50:45] I'm happy to answer them. Next, at least.
[50:52] The next topic is home-based businesses.
[50:55] This proposed amendment would eliminate the requirement for a call occupation permit.
[51:02] It also changes the mean of a call occupation for home-based business to be used in English.
[51:10] And it also changes the list of businesses that would be allowed to be home-based businesses.
[51:17] services, it would now include limited app
[51:19] on instruction, personal services, and without
[51:24] actually disloating the massage.
[51:26] We just have a lot of transactions and limited
[51:30] board culture.
[51:30] These are all pretty common businesses that we hear people
[51:34] wanting to run from at home, since they want to do
[51:36] that, and found their homes.
[51:39] That people need to be operated reasonably within
[51:44] and they don't have to end with a grant or something
[51:46] or it goes to spending.
[51:50] Next,
[51:55] we'll recall that formula of businesses
[51:57] were assessed by our Sunday session
[51:59] with the Actifying Development Board.
[52:01] As I noted at that time,
[52:03] the current right-culation framework
[52:06] does not effectively limit or prohibit
[52:08] one of the businesses.
[52:10] We also don't have any current or recent trends
[52:13] for the asset class that gave formula of businesses
[52:16] is needing to locate all of those right and finish up.
[52:20] So this term, most of the time, we're
[52:21] repeal the formal businesses section of the zoning
[52:25] ordinance and make other related updates.
[52:28] It isn't that we have.
[52:29] And we believe that this will help to reduce
[52:31] confusion for businesses hoping or choosing
[52:35] to locate the initial.
[52:38] Next slide, please.
[52:44] So there's a significant overlap within both the municipal code
[52:49] and it out in town. The issues master plan is particular site build folks is almost a
[52:55] down time issues master plan which means studios and alternatives is only using natural
[53:01] recreation. What we propose in the down time issues master plan area is to create
[53:08] consistency between the zoning requirements for these uses. So in other words,
[53:15] 5 to 1,500 square feet, studios full of businesses and commercial organizations will need to be a committed use in a task force of about 1,500 square feet they would require a release on it.
[53:32] Currently, I believe that that's how it's used in the last year.
[53:35] It does not allow studios above the Internet to serve the Internet as topics.
[53:44] That is
[53:47] why our impuirsting is a topic that this commission has to assess.
[53:52] And as I noted, we're going to meet our opinion March.
[53:55] By our own person are really open to the cultural norms of 2025.
[53:59] This proposed amendment for the ability to research and on by our impuirsting.
[54:04] It's actually a limitation that all exists in the top four zone and body are piercing to be provided as a personal service a lot of other related uses.
[54:16] Next slide, please.
[54:20] All the better sales. This is something that would be with the line city wide.
[54:27] So currently, all the better sales in the liquor store.
[54:31] I wish their work buyers at least from into downtown should permit it outside of the downtown.
[54:40] This proposed change would align the regulations to the downtown.
[54:46] So they'll look or so or any other initiative or buyer to use for it.
[54:50] It's stand alone on the call.
[54:52] On call by our sales.
[54:53] whoever may not call the beverage sales are part of our business.
[55:00] For example, if you see in the room on my group, really, in the government market, the sale of the local government instance does not require use from it. It would just be permitted in the statutory motion. So, the proposed zoning makes that clear.
[55:17] Next slide please.
[55:24] So right now, we're talking about the downtown area and this particular topic comes a lot
[55:31] of back.
[55:31] So first, we were supposed to separate bars and the tolerance from the inflows.
[55:37] The inflows will be coming to you so it's no longer permitted.
[55:40] They're certainly fine, but not permitted in the downtown.
[55:45] This has no effect on how for entertainment.
[55:47] If you do have an opportunity to venue the downtown, it is not considered a nightclub that would not be affected by this change.
[55:54] For bars and tolerance in this town, for example, these businesses are currently a permitted use, and they operate until 9 p.m.
[56:03] If they are required to use service operating after 9 p.m.
[56:07] This her post-change will allow them to be a permitted use if they operate until 10 p.m.
[56:12] and requirements following average.
[56:15] Yeah.
[56:17] If it's out for open bars and towers are only traditionally
[56:25] from which means that they require reviews from it,
[56:28] that was for being the same,
[56:30] that they would be allowed to be conditionally
[56:32] from a physical 10 p.m. instead of 9 p.m.
[56:36] And then also this proposed ordinance
[56:41] would establish on the 5th of October really getting your first pension like 4 of each year
[56:49] to allow amplitude amplification within the primary matter of the noise ordinance until 12.30 am.
[56:58] Next slide.
[57:05] The better service, this is the topic that is focused outside the down-top of the
[57:09] mission's master plan area. Similar to the bar's timers in the E-plus, the even-adjuring the
[57:17] in the category is really inclusive in a way that I think has created a shield of the sound.
[57:25] So by that I mean if you have a song in one sort of cocktail or have a full service bar,
[57:30] that actually requires a release permit, you can serve your own line, that's the way to be served in the release permit.
[57:37] Because that's how that doesn't apply fully in the release.
[57:40] This, for postman, the sort of separate
[57:44] union establishments or grouping establishments.
[57:47] So, an union establishments to the restaurant,
[57:51] it's a permitted use, it's a permitted use,
[57:53] whether they serve your wine,
[57:56] whether they serve your wine cocktails or bar,
[57:59] that's not affected for the restaurant.
[58:03] The regulation for tricky establishments,
[58:06] bars and tablets, would mirror the downtown,
[58:08] so that in commercial zones you're going to establish this would be permitted to
[58:14] stop until 10 p.m. and we'll require this currently after the day. And that's
[58:20] how all commercial zones act on this, that's how many industries have been in certain
[58:25] conditions.
[58:33] We also would make a decision in the industrial districts, so in the
[58:40] industrial districts we'll offer better services that be permitted only with
[58:45] far the immediate assumption.
[58:52] The P-Gal service is customary for almost all types of restaurants,
[58:57] and is also included in the overeat.
[58:59] As we discuss this in regulation is the,
[59:03] we proposed to delete the service on the board.
[59:06] Next slide, please.
[59:11] The P-Gal has regulations for LIV entertainment
[59:14] that are different outside the downtown
[59:16] than they are in the downtown.
[59:19] But with both changes, we are really simplified
[59:21] by the definition of lyberic element.
[59:24] And you can see here, it's comping musical performance
[59:27] as on a scheduled basis,
[59:30] which is more than three tests per year, I apologize for that.
[59:35] And the concept of lyberic element
[59:38] would actually be separated from lyberic elements.
[59:42] Lyberic element, in many cases,
[59:45] is actually a custom area for being given
[59:46] to establish elements in a set of different impacts
[59:49] the nightclub. And so this proposal will allow life energy management to permit
[59:55] abuse essentially in a day to 10 p.m. was located indoors.
[1:00:00] All of the regulations, but it is outside the standards, it would require a use permit,
[1:00:09] may plus it would not be permitted in the state.
[1:00:15] Next slide, please.
[1:00:19] Local government meeting is a permitted use in industrial districts. It's also becoming more
[1:00:24] customary for employment areas. The health department regulates local government for my health
[1:00:31] of that city standpoint. This city would be between the global
[1:00:35] woodmening regulations, but eliminate your partner for an old
[1:00:39] woodmening permit. So we'll be certain five of the zoning and we'll
[1:00:43] be certain five of the health department for our assault.
[1:00:46] Next slide please.
[1:00:51] Health and fitness facilities if you're updating
[1:00:53] proposing to update these regulations across the board.
[1:00:57] The amendments would create a consistent definition of health and
[1:01:01] facilities for all areas of the city held in the facilities are customary
[1:01:07] commercial use in both neighborhood, commercial and central commercial areas
[1:01:12] and the right for post-regulations to create a broader range of circumstances
[1:01:18] in which health and fitness facilities can be implemented in use.
[1:01:23] So the downtown and limited industrial zone would below a certain floor area
[1:01:29] health and fitness facilities to be implemented.
[1:01:32] Use in the community, commercial and issues limit zones held in the facilities to be
[1:01:39] implemented.
[1:01:39] Mid-use of this are operating hours.
[1:01:42] Last week, those are really zones that are in bed within the guidelines.
[1:01:47] And then outside of those areas, the health and fitness facilities to be implemented.
[1:01:53] Next slide.
[1:01:54] But this
[1:01:58] preparation is currently a very broad category of uses, as you've discussed
[1:02:03] currently, or is everything from something like a birthday, so our children's play center
[1:02:12] all year soon are we up.
[1:02:14] So we are proposing to modify these classification and really narrow what's meaning.
[1:02:23] It would be distinguished from how the business has a list of their deaths assessed, as well
[1:02:27] as well as larger sports in Virginia and some releases,
[1:02:30] particularly OBS.
[1:02:33] The proposed changes with Santa conditions under which
[1:02:36] commercial work radiation uses from it,
[1:02:39] currently for short duration of fires and use permit.
[1:02:42] Similar to daycare, these uses are usually small businesses.
[1:02:48] They're well received in a community
[1:02:50] by the use permit requirement in a timeline
[1:02:53] I'm pretty over-lossable to salvage any sense of the diseases.
[1:02:58] In downtown, the regulations have matched the certain
[1:03:02] glitch parameters for studios and health and fitness
[1:03:05] thresholds and health and fitness facilities.
[1:03:10] It will be permitted in general,
[1:03:12] martial and the extreme standards,
[1:03:14] traditionally permitted in the community,
[1:03:16] martial standards.
[1:03:18] In the industrial areas, the offers to be
[1:03:21] for commercial recreation would be more than it.
[1:03:24] Well, still, I would like to provide opportunities
[1:03:27] for undersource training facilities.
[1:03:30] It would be within parameters
[1:03:32] for locations and service passes.
[1:03:36] Next slide, please.
[1:03:40] So, sports and entertainment assembly
[1:03:41] is a large scale end of our current commercial
[1:03:45] recreation use classification.
[1:03:47] We will post today as a separate use.
[1:03:50] And it's really associated with secondary
[1:03:53] are going to sports and outdoor amusement. Typically this type of facility is in where
[1:03:59] regionals are all, so it's a bridge to separate it. And the purpose that it would be
[1:04:06] conditionally permitted to be used for this required and the general partial public incident
[1:04:11] and public and open space just to respond with me.
[1:04:15] Next slide, please.
[1:04:19] There are other issues that are proposed.
[1:04:23] If you see the markup of the zoning,
[1:04:26] there's a fairly extensive offer
[1:04:28] to make some cleanup.
[1:04:30] And the references in the HLL,
[1:04:32] the references are correct in the sections that are touching.
[1:04:35] They showed that the format is consistent
[1:04:39] and that the organization that the NISL code
[1:04:41] but it's also consistent for the ease of its use.
[1:04:46] We go close to change the department and director,
[1:04:49] maybe from community development department
[1:04:52] and community development director,
[1:04:55] to development services department
[1:04:56] and development services director.
[1:05:01] Currently, the city has a community services department and a community development firm. And the name to be evolving is not terribly used or running to start with, but now it's creating a little more confusion for people. And so we want to ensure that and release it. He was to describe what we do.
[1:05:23] We also proposed to update that permitted hours for office and retail in our downtown zone. So this is an early minute.
[1:05:32] change. Currently, there are limitations on office and retail that require them.
[1:05:41] In some cases, to stop operating the other cases, so to use permit, if they're open after 7 p.m.,
[1:05:48] and be proposed to bomb that 8 p.m. Next slide, please.
[1:05:55] Next slide, please.
[1:06:01] So this evening is
[1:06:02] about the planning and sharing and we hope that the commission will offer a recommendation.
[1:06:08] If that occurs, our plan is to bring this to the City Council for a first reading and second reading
[1:06:14] and adoption in July and August. It will prove to be ordinance or state of fact top of 30 days.
[1:06:21] So this is that time. Next slide please.
[1:06:27] We recommend that the commission find this project
[1:06:29] tied for the exact opportunity of California environmental quality act by
[1:06:34] learning section 1.5.3.0.1, which pertains to existing facilities and 1.5.3.0.5, which
[1:06:42] pertains to minor alterations to land these limitations. The proposed amendments
[1:06:46] are really minor and the extreme winter existing regulations and processes and
[1:06:53] on their own do not have the potential to result in significant environmental impacts.
[1:06:58] Next slide please.
[1:07:02] So recommendation for this evening is that you can back up the public hearing and move to a doctoral resolution recommending the City Council adopted limits to the initial expo code and the outcome of she's master plan after finding the project.
[1:07:16] exactly.
[1:07:19] With
[1:07:22] that, you have any questions you have, would you have a slide with a little
[1:07:26] amount of data that we need to record that?
[1:07:31] Okay.
[1:07:31] Any questions?
[1:07:38] And any questions?
[1:07:40] Any questions or any questions?
[1:07:47] Just that of curiosity, the updated power source, we're going to tell
[1:07:50] someone's going for all of the seven to age.
[1:07:53] Is there any reason why we didn't eat in one?
[1:07:57] You know, it seems like we're forcing people to decide
[1:08:01] to shut down the retail source early
[1:08:04] for real estate companies.
[1:08:09] These zones are in downtown New Yorkers,
[1:08:12] the means to be, which is the top four of some.
[1:08:15] And then we have, we have other zones
[1:08:18] that are really very good with any of them.
[1:08:21] They kind of stand out into the neighborhood
[1:08:22] and in some cases, they just
[1:08:24] as a stand alone district in the middle of a residential area.
[1:08:29] It will leave that the downtown Michigan master plan was trying to limit the potential
[1:08:36] made in impacts of commercial uses on these homes.
[1:08:40] And why they were stuck below that.
[1:08:42] I'm not aware of the time when the city has been required to enforce the
[1:08:47] hours of operation on business.
[1:08:49] They also were aware that sometimes the lawyers office,
[1:08:52] or dentist's office, or another type of office needs to be opened after 7 p.m.
[1:09:01] So, the recommendation was to build a little bit more room within the ordinance for kind of standard operating hours.
[1:09:10] Without necessarily eliminating the parameters on house operation,
[1:09:17] which were clearly developed with a thought towards the American faculty.
[1:09:25] I understand that my concern was we're trying to create activity especially in downtown and so I don't know if that's there and they can't stop at a workshop
[1:09:37] or they can't really, especially stop any more after they have to function at the clock.
[1:09:43] So, I mean, I would go there, you should want me there, I would go there, but I just
[1:09:56] want to take a look at the draft board.
[1:10:00] So I can be clear about where we're proposing to make these changes. The limitation on hours of operation for retail office to not fly to the town force on just first street. So these would be more in the town for open,
[1:10:27] open, New York, general, and
[1:10:35] the original.
[1:10:36] all of this.
[1:10:43] And the other part of the question is,
[1:10:45] is
[1:10:50] there one that I would like to put on?
[1:10:59] Well, I would like to public comment.
[1:11:01] Those are the same.
[1:11:03] We're all really wishing to make comment.
[1:11:04] We've wasted a week.
[1:11:06] And it made it a lot of time to speak.
[1:11:08] Or dispense that I'm going to make my phone.
[1:11:10] We first started my mind to comment.
[1:11:13] Super distance may be seen by an incentive to make comment or
[1:11:16] utilize it for a very hand teacher.
[1:11:19] And you're already dispense with it.
[1:11:20] does anybody actually make public comments that may be my radio media audio? You're a disfigured
[1:11:28] person about to make public comment. Yes, I'm the only.
[1:11:48] Your chair, I'm going to give you a question.
[1:11:54] First, if you could try the city's definition of a nightclub and those who are far with
[1:12:04] of life and achievement, I would appreciate that.
[1:12:09] And seven hour wait on the bar's tower and nightclubs page.
[1:12:16] It says, temporary relief would be granted to our administration
[1:12:21] in the folder A on Denver first and July 4th of the year.
[1:12:27] And I just walked in and burned.
[1:12:29] is that on badly branded or is that through a use permit?
[1:12:39] Do they have to do this a business or?
[1:12:42] Do they have to apply for that?
[1:12:44] Are there
[1:12:48] anyone
[1:13:19] on?
[1:13:23] We do not.
[1:13:30] And then you have a comment that there are 3D in on the side of
[1:13:42] it.
[1:13:42] 3D in there is not.
[1:13:46] So, with another other public comment, we'll post a public comment of the assignment and
[1:13:52] very fast commission for further deliberation.
[1:13:56] I don't know if you guys want to be able to do it.
[1:13:59] It's a little cold.
[1:14:02] Absolutely.
[1:14:02] necessarily have to answer those questions.
[1:14:06] So I will first start on a question of the beginning
[1:14:10] of my club.
[1:14:11] I will start with the downtown issue.
[1:14:13] It's not certainly an issue that I have a condition.
[1:14:16] And I close the facility serving
[1:14:18] alcoholic beverages for onset consumption.
[1:14:21] And for writing entertainment, examples of which
[1:14:24] include life, music, and organizing, comedy, et cetera.
[1:14:27] Does not include adult oriented businesses
[1:14:30] this or our emergency. That's the proposed sounds on the issues about certain plant definition.
[1:14:36] Then in the nation's school code, the proposed definition for life entertainment is energy
[1:14:45] and life, but internet. These activities such as comedy, musical, or theatrical performances by one
[1:14:54] or more persons, which are growing settled basis through or days during the calendar year.
[1:15:00] On the site of the use other than the public or sunny public use. The proposed definition of a
[1:15:07] medical club is the facility serving all the beverages for onsite consumption and providing
[1:15:13] life entertainment. Examples of which include light music, indoor dancing, comedy, et cetera,
[1:15:19] Bachelors and PM, one and one and three, designed include ill-righted businesses.
[1:15:26] And then there is not is the state definition for education establishment.
[1:15:32] Eating and union establishments are combined with the municipal code for the union school code.
[1:15:39] Eating and union establishments means business-specific repair, food or beverages,
[1:15:43] focus on all of the purposes, not really campus or campus
[1:15:48] products. With live entertainment, it includes
[1:15:51] established and offline live entertainment as defined
[1:15:54] in a charter service control, BNC, which is an
[1:15:57] invention by the way. So if I may, could just say
[1:16:02] that Latin describe the stations. So I'll say this
[1:16:09] This is out of town here, you know, a drinking nostalgia with live entertainment is to see
[1:16:16] which from a club by the primary function, right, is there a dancing, is it really always
[1:16:25] around the entertainment is an opportunity.
[1:16:28] Where the primary function of drinking nostalgia is sale of all the virtues and the lives
[1:16:34] there's no need to be sure of business.
[1:16:37] In the downtown, it is
[1:16:44] the sale of polypyridous
[1:16:49] peroxide insumption again and our team
[1:16:51] and include biobusic, inorganic, incomic, et cetera.
[1:16:56] Which is, again, when the inner team
[1:16:59] is an essential part of the use, whereas a bar
[1:17:04] Taver or TZ facility is really oriented around uphauled beverages sold primarily for on-state
[1:17:11] consumption. So I've asked to do with the balance of being our treatment in relation to the sale
[1:17:19] of uphauled beverages.
[1:17:23] The other question was asked is about what's intended with the temporary
[1:17:28] will be provisioned in the town for some. Currently, if somebody wants to amplify music after hours
[1:17:37] of noise ordinance, they have to petition 5.2 athletes. One, they can't do use permit needles
[1:17:42] to do that or require this. So, as everyone can, when you sit in Bill's NPM, every Friday night,
[1:17:48] I can continue to use permit and be allowed to analyze Bill's NPM by everybody. If it's a one-time
[1:17:54] I can petition City Council for temporary relief for that one thing. So if you're looking at the City Council's joint first agenda, you will see the petition for temporary relief for one time and then for a business in the downtown.
[1:18:09] What we propose to do here is to grant an annual temporary relief so it does not require a special application to be granted by way of the time that she's master plan.
[1:18:22] for, and I mean for many, it's not inspiring me to get a suggestion. The evening of December 31st, leading into January 1st, until 12.30 a.m., the evening of July 3rd, leading into July 4th until 12.30 a.m., they're not meet to be a separate petition for December 8th, if actions.
[1:18:45] with still option line.
[1:18:47] Oh yeah.
[1:18:48] Thank
[1:18:53] you.
[1:18:54] Any.
[1:18:56] The liberation.
[1:18:56] College of comments and
[1:18:57] commissioners.
[1:19:02] I like the process.
[1:19:05] It's nice to try and appreciate the work.
[1:19:07] That's that.
[1:19:08] All right.
[1:19:09] Our community.
[1:19:11] Well,
[1:19:13] for the duration.
[1:19:15] In.
[1:19:16] Ocean.
[1:19:34] Yeah.
[1:19:42] I
[1:19:49] need to be clarified, and I need to make sure I understand Fisher Cotton's motion.
[1:19:55] Um, because you're kind of lose, uh, it's a rubber.
[1:20:00] And if I could call out that we're going to sit in the next paragraph.
[1:20:06] Do we have a second?
[1:20:09] Second.
[1:20:23] So basically you're moving the resolution back.
[1:20:26] You're moving the call out the next.
[1:20:27] I
[1:20:31] just wanted to make sure we're clear that that's like.
[1:20:38] If that is what the motion and other options.
[1:20:42] Thank you.
[1:20:42] Thank you. Yes. So we have a motion from Commissioner Patten, the second from Commissioner Wilde to move this board has to start.
[1:20:57] Commissioner Cat.
[1:21:03] Commissioner Gilton Hayes.
[1:21:13] Thank you. Commissioner Gorman.
[1:21:19] Commissioner Lyle.
[1:21:21] Yes. Commissioner Marshall and
[1:21:30] acting chair sleep. Yes. Thank you. For the record, I just want to check because my, my sound is not that great. Commissioner Marshall, you said yes. Yes. Thank you.
[1:21:44] Yeah.
[1:21:52] Staff members of the commission.
[1:21:57] Staff is at one.
[1:21:59] Um,
[1:21:59] Um,
[1:21:59] Um,
[1:21:59] Um,
[1:22:00] Um,
[1:22:02] Um,
[1:22:05] Um,
[1:22:07] Um,
[1:22:19] Um,
[1:22:29] Um,
[1:22:29] It's official. Thank you.