[0:07] [music]
[0:16] Good evening and welcome everyone
present and watching online. I would
[0:19] like to call the Monday, March 9th, 2026
planning commission meeting to order.
[0:24] Please rise and join us in the pledge of
allegiance.
[0:30] I aliance to the flag of the United
States of America and to the republic
[0:36] for it stands. One nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice
[0:41] for all.
>> All right, I see Miss Shantel to my
[0:47] right filling in for Tracy. Could I get
a roll call for attendance, please?
[0:51] » Commissioner Ingressol,
>> present.
[0:54] » Commissioner Pumprey,
>> present. Commissioner Silkenberry,
[0:57] » present.
>> Commissioner Richell,
[0:59] » present.
>> Commissioner Sanderson,
[1:01] » present.
>> Commissioner Kra,
[1:04] » present.
>> Commissioner Graham,
[1:06] » present.
>> Vice Chairperson How
[1:09] » here.
>> And Chairperson Henny,
[1:11] » present. Thank you very much. At this
time, I would entertain a motion to
[1:14] approve the consent agenda for the
February 23rd, 2026 meeting minutes.
[1:19] » So moved.
>> Second.
[1:20] » Motion and a second. All those in favor?
>> I.
[1:23] » Same sign for opposed.
>> All right. I'll now open the public
[1:26] hearing for agenda item number four, UDC
text amendment, UDCT01269774.
[1:36] [clears throat]
And I would ask for uh staff
[1:39] presentation.
[1:42] » Good evening, commissioners. My name is
Nick Hutchson. I'm the interimm director
[1:46] of city development. Uh before you
tonight is a proposed UD UDC text
[1:50] amendment related to short-term rentals.
The purpose of this amendment is not to
[1:56] prohibit short-term rentals, but to
establish a more clear and enforceable
[1:59] standard that addresses life safety,
neighborhood compatibility, and tax
[2:04] compliance. This item comes forward in
response to city council's direction and
[2:09] community concerns related to STR
operations, particularly around noise,
[2:15] parking occupancy, and the city's
ability to ensure hotel motel tax
[2:20] compliance.
At a high level, this amendment modifies
[2:24] three sections of the code. First is
chapter 605 business licensing. Second
[2:29] is chapter 655 hotel motel. And third is
the UDC. There are key operational
[2:37] standards. Uh for occupancy, two persons
are allowed per legal bedroom plus two
[2:42] additional occupants, a maximum of 10
occupants unless otherwise approved by
[2:47] the fire marshall. parking. Uh, one off-
streetet parking space per bedroom up to
[2:52] four spaces. For properties located in
downtown, on street parking within a
[2:57] quarter mile may be used to satisfy this
requirement. For noise and events, there
[3:02] are quiet hours of operation from 11:00
p.m. to 6:00 a.m. And outdoor amplified
[3:08] sound is prohibited during this time,
and it does not allow for commercial or
[3:12] ticketed events.
Life safety uh requires smoke detector,
[3:17] carbon monoxide detector and fire
extinguishers
[3:21] as a self compliant report and a code
compliant egress.
[3:28] For local contact, a responsible agent
must be available 247 and respond on
[3:34] site within 60 minutes. The development
advisory committee has reviewed this
[3:38] item at their January 20th meeting and
recommends approval. Based on the
[3:42] analysis provided in the staff report,
staff recommends approval of the UDC
[3:47] text amendment for short-term rentals as
presented.
[3:52] » Any questions for staff? [clears throat]
[3:58] » Um,
all right. Um,
[4:04] I'll repeat one of my concerns during
the work session about requiring the
[4:08] local host agents to be uh required to
respond on site within 60 minutes. Um,
[4:14] that's still an issue for me, but we
were
[4:18] um
Is there anybody in the audience who
[4:21] would like to speak in favor of this
project?
[4:24] Anybody
in the audience would like to speak in
[4:27] opposition to this?
[4:36] » Your full name, please.
>> My name is Laura Wade.
[4:41] I realize that the proposal is
addressing only short-term rentals.
[4:46] However, I believe that it is very
limited
[4:51] for the commission to only look at
short-term rentals. It does not address
[4:56] midterm rentals
um which
[5:03] is then not looking at the safety of
anyone beyond 30 days. If this is
[5:09] proposed to
[5:13] address the needs of the community as
well as the needs of the rental
[5:18] individuals,
we're we're not really
[5:22] addressing the needs.
If we're only looking at those that are
[5:26] renting for 30 days, we're also then not
we're not looking at a comprehensive
[5:32] plan because then our community also is
not asking the same for landlords. We
[5:39] only ask for them to voluntarily
submit their contact information. We're
[5:46] asking for short-term rental
landlords, hosts to be available or have
[5:52] an agent available 24/7, but we're only
asking for our landlords in the
[5:57] community to voluntarily give contact
information
[6:01] if they were needed to be contacted in
case of an emergency. It seems like
[6:05] quite a disparity. It seems to me that
it would be a better for our commission
[6:11] to look at a comprehensive plan that
would address all of these areas and not
[6:17] just that of short-term rental. And I
agree with you, Mr. Henning, that a 247
[6:23] 60 minute uh uh
prompt response time. I'm sorry. My
[6:32] husband has decided that we should take
this venture. But there are times when I
[6:38] can't be available within 60 minutes and
he is working and I know [clears throat]
[6:44] that he can't. Um it's just not
realistic.
[6:50] Um, I want to comply and I will agree
that if if the proposal is the same as
[6:56] it was last month, it does it also does
not address how we're going to fulfill
[7:05] the safety requirements.
Who's going to meet those? Who who's
[7:10] going to police? Excuse me, that's not
really the best term, but who's going to
[7:18] police that that the properties are
meeting the safety requirements?
[7:23] It's purely voluntary if we are not
implementing something that requires
[7:30] and that would have to be funded, but
for the the fire department to come out
[7:33] and and and to inspect each property,
um I just think it needs to be more
[7:40] complete.
I want our guests in our community to be
[7:46] safe, but I just think it needs to be
thought out better.
[7:51] » Thank you for your comments. You've been
heard. And uh also, as you know, feel
[7:56] free to come back in two weeks and share
your thoughts with the city council.
[8:00] » Thank you.
>> This is our body recommends uh what they
[8:03] do and it'll be their final decision.
Anybody here that would like to speak in
[8:07] opposition to this?
[8:11] Seeing none and hearing none, I will
close the public comment section of this
[8:15] hearing. Um,
I will reiterate my concerns
[8:20] [clears throat] about the requirement of
the local responsible agent to
[8:27] be available 24 hours a day and respond
on site within 60 minutes.
[8:32] » [clears throat]
>> When we get to a motion, I would uh
[8:35] encourage an amended motion to reduce to
just eliminate on-site
[8:41] and that the local host shall respond
within 60 minutes to complaints or
[8:47] emergencies.
Um
[8:50] any comments on that or anything else
for staff before we get to Yes, Mr.
[8:54] Crow?
>> Uh like to say a couple things. Um,
[9:00] thank you for allowing us to come back
to this from our last meeting, get a
[9:05] chance to research and study it. Thank
the audience, the citizens who came here
[9:10] today to express themselves about what
they what they're concerned about makes
[9:14] sense about discussing what the
comprehensive plan talking about
[9:18] short-term, midterm, and what she
suggested and having a plan in place for
[9:23] everybody. and we want to make sure that
we're taking care of all of our
[9:26] residents and our neighborhoods are
safe. Of course, that's the main
[9:30] objective.
Um, I would support responsible
[9:34] short-term rentals with clear
enforceable standards that protect
[9:38] neighborhood integrity and property
values rather than overly restrictive
[9:42] owner and occupancy mandates. I believe
requiring a [clears throat] local point
[9:46] of contact, somebody who can respond
within 24 hours to have somebody
[9:51] designated is a is maybe a practical way
to ensure accountability.
[9:56] Enforcement should be complaint driven
and focused on repeat verified
[10:01] violations with registration escalating
penalties and potential permit
[10:06] suspension for chronic offenders.
responsible pro property owners
[10:10] shouldn't be overburdened but persistent
problems should have real consequences
[10:16] and we talked about uh some enforcement
mechanisms
[10:21] and I had a chance to look at some I'm
sure the rest of you probably glance at
[10:25] something I saw something where it
mentioned something about registration
[10:28] and permit requirement u doing that
annually reg doing an annual
[10:33] registration with the city uh having a
24-hour contact require environment.
[10:39] They must respond within a set time
frame. And maybe a three strike rule
[10:45] repeated verified violations for such
things as noise, nuisance, and safety
[10:51] would result in fines and possible
permit suspension. And also permit
[10:56] revocation for chronic violations, but
only after due process. And of course,
[11:01] complaintbased enforcement. enforcement
should be triggered by documented
[11:06] complaints but with no random
inspections and getting to the point
[11:10] where the group brought in they came in
there talking about the child care
[11:14] centers I think that's very important
that's something that should be
[11:17] addressed [clears throat] we should
probably have some kind of stipulation
[11:21] to protect the children and in those
type of areas for whatever our zoning
[11:26] requirements are and again to address uh
the lady who came in and talked about
[11:32] the mid uh term rentals as well. I think
that's something we should consider.
[11:37] That's all I have to say. Thank you.
>> Any other questions for staff or
[11:43] discussions uh amongst ourselves before
I close the public hearing?
[11:49] Public hearing is now closed.
Before I ask for a motion, I have a
[11:54] question for legal.
I typically as a chairman don't make
[11:58] motions myself. Is that something that
is allowed by the chairman or if I want
[12:04] to change somebody else's motion, is
that how they do it?
[12:08] » Um, yes. Uh, typically what I see is
that um, [clears throat] normally
[12:12] someone else besides the chair would
make the motion.
[12:18] » All right. Uh, the public hearing is
closed. At this time, I'll ask for a
[12:22] motion for the UDC text amendment.
[12:29] I'm going to give this a shot.
>> Yes.
[12:30] » Um I move to approve UDC 01269774
with the following amendment. Uh to
[12:40] eliminate the on-site verbiage
altogether and response time within
[12:47] 24 hours.
>> I have a motion.
[12:51] » I would like to see response time of 60
minutes.
[12:55] » Well, we have a motion.
>> So that's what we vote on.
[12:59] Um,
>> do I have a second?
[13:03] » Second.
>> I have a motion and a second.
[13:06] » Could I get a roll call, please? On.
>> Commissioner Graham.
[13:12] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Cradle.
[13:15] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Sanderson.
[13:18] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Richell.
[13:21] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Stokenberry. Hi
[13:27] » Commissioner Ingresol.
>> Hi.
[13:29] » Commissioner Pumprey.
>> No,
[13:34] » Vice Chairperson How?
>> I
[13:37] » and Chairperson Henny.
>> I
[13:41] All right, that passed. And that item
will be recommended and heard by the
[13:44] city council at their next meeting on
Monday, March 16th,
[13:48] uh 6 o'clock in this very room. Moving
on. Uh agenda item number five and
[13:54] seven. I will open the public hearing
for general development plan GDP
[13:58] 12259749
for Mcatee Village with the preliminary
[14:02] plat being heard concurrently. I will
ask for exhibits from our our city
[14:06] attorney.
[14:13] » This is being continued. There probably
is no exhibits at this time.
[14:16] » I do not have any. Okay. The applicant
has requested the continuence of these
[14:20] items to Monday, March 9th, 2026.
How about a motion to continue this?
[14:26] » Excuse me, chair.
>> Yes,
[14:27] » I think that's going to be continued to
March 23rd.
[14:32] » Yes, March 23rd. The date is wrong.
>> I stand corrected. This will be uh
[14:38] continued and or to be heard by the
[14:43] » on the March [snorts] 23rd meeting.
I'll second that.
[14:48] » Yes. Uh I have a motion.
>> You motion. I'll second.
[14:52] » Okay. Motion in [laughter] a second.
Thanks for helping me through that.
[14:55] » Yeah.
>> Um all those in favor.
[14:58] » Any deni? Any no.
>> All right. That motion passes.
[15:02] » At this time, I will open the public
hearing for agenda item number six,
[15:06] which is conditional use permit CUPC
0126-9786
[15:11] for Mony's daycare. I will ask for
exhibits from our city attorney.
[15:16] Um yes, Mr. Chairman. Um I have as
exhibits one exhibit that's the staff
[15:21] report and all of that's attachments.
>> All right. And looks like we got a staff
[15:27] presentation. Mr. D.
>> Uh good evening, commissioners. Uh
[15:33] before you this evening is a request for
approval of a conditional uh use permit
[15:38] for a inhome daycare located at 9305
Southwest Orca Court. Uh the proposed
[15:44] daycare will operate in a manner that
does not oper or alter the character of
[15:48] the scale of the existing single family
resident or the surrounding
[15:52] neighborhood. Uh inhome daycarees are
identified as a conditional use within
[15:57] residential districts and are required
to remain subordinate to the primary
[16:01] residents residential use of the
property.
[16:06] uh with the proposed conditions listed
in the staff report, the request is
[16:09] consistent with the intent of the zoning
district and is compatible with the
[16:14] surrounding residential properties. In
addition to maintaining and renewing a
[16:19] valid uh business license, the daycare
must remain in compliance with all
[16:23] applicable city, county, and state
requirements governing general daycare
[16:28] operations. Um I'm happy to answer any
questions, and the applicant is here to
[16:33] answer any as well.
Thank you for that. Any questions for
[16:37] staff before we hear from the applicant?
[16:42] » All right. Is the applicant here would
like to speak on behalf of the project?
[16:45] » Yes.
[16:51] » Hello. My name is Mav Rafi. This is my
mom, Monro. She's the owner of Mon
[16:56] State.
[16:59] » Would you like to talk at all about your
your your project?
[17:02] » Yeah. So my mom has been in the daycare
inh home daycare business for a long
[17:08] time now about 15 16 years. We uh we've
been Lee Summit residents for over 20
[17:14] years. She did have an inhome daycare in
another part of Lee Summit in Charleston
[17:19] Park area that was also approved and um
we are trying to expand into a facility
[17:26] daycare uh within the next couple
months. This is just temporary for us to
[17:31] be able to resume business until we can
secure our outside facility and will no
[17:36] longer require the inh home daycare.
>> Anything else?
[17:42] » That's it.
>> That would be it.
[17:43] » Okay. Thank you very much.
>> Any um any questions up here before we
[17:49] hear from the public?
>> All right. Thank you very much.
[17:53] » Seemed like news to you. The temporary.
>> Yes.
[17:57] » No. it.
>> Huh?
[17:59] » No comment.
>> All right. Um,
[18:06] is there is [clears throat] there
anybody in the audience that would like
[18:09] to speak in favor of this project?
[18:14] » Is there anybody in the audience that
would like to speak in opposition to
[18:16] this project?
>> Name and address.
[18:20] » I think I did a lot of work for nothing.
[clears throat]
[18:24] » Hi, good evening.
>> Address, please. My name is Mike Aerson.
[18:28] I live at 9309
Southwest Orchid Court. I'm just east of
[18:34] where the proposed daycare is wanting to
go.
[18:38] So, let me give you a little background.
We got [clears throat] lucky. We hit the
[18:40] jackpot in 2021
after living in Independence my entire
[18:45] life. I'm 67 years old. My wife is in
her 60s. We spent our entire life there.
[18:51] We hit the jackpot, moved the Blue
Springs, moved into a little nicer
[18:55] upscale neighborhood.
The perfect scenario was finding a
[19:00] culde-sac that backed up to nothing but
woods. And we found that and it's been
[19:07] absolutely wonderful. We have one of the
smallest of all of the actual culde-sacs
[19:14] in the neighborhood. There's only five
homes.
[19:17] That's it. Five. Clark and Robin live at
the main entrance that ties into Orca
[19:22] off of of Conch. And then there's four
homes wrapped around the bottom of the
[19:28] circle.
Out of those five homes, three of them
[19:32] have retirees. My wife and I are
retired. Clark's retired. We have le uh
[19:40] police officer detective that's retired.
So you kind of get the feel for what our
[19:46] little culde-sac kind of looks like. We
love kids. We all have kids. We've
[19:51] raised kids. We have grandkids. So so on
and so forth. One of the things that we
[19:57] got was this ladder. And oh, excuse me.
And unfortunately, this didn't go out to
[20:02] our entire neighborhood because it had a
boundary limit on it of 185 ft. That's
[20:08] it. So nobody else outside of who's
here. one of the neighbors son's having
[20:14] a birthday so he's spending that with
his family so didn't have a lot of time
[20:18] to really get prepared and you know with
something like this it could either be
[20:23] in the favor of the neighborhood or
maybe not as favorable for the
[20:28] neighborhood so that's why I'm here so
what I did in the process of trying to
[20:32] find out we didn't have a lot of time to
put things together I couldn't believe
[20:36] how efficient the blue springs
government actually is this thing right
[20:41] here I thought I'm going to find out
what there is to know about home
[20:46] industry.
That's what I wanted to know. I wanted
[20:49] to learn about it. And when I got to
gleaning through some of the pages here,
[20:53] one of the most important things here is
on this page. It says things to
[20:58] consider. If you live in a neighborhood
managed by a homeowners association, it
[21:03] is a good idea to check whether it can
restrict your business activities.
[21:09] Well, I'm here to tell you that we have
a very robust website.
[21:16] All the information that you need if you
live in that neighborhood could be found
[21:20] on that website. ARC request forms.
That's the first thing that needed to
[21:26] happen with this case was that they
needed to glean through, get an ARC
[21:31] request, send it in, let it go through
the approval process.
[21:36] » Hold on just one minute. We didn't I
didn't tell you this in the beginning,
[21:38] but we usually have three minute time
limits.
[21:41] » Okay.
>> So, your three minutes three minutes is
[21:43] up. But since I didn't tell you that and
we don't have a huge gallery tonight,
[21:47] I'm I'm gonna let you go a couple more.
>> Okay.
[21:49] » But wrap it up.
>> All right. I will
[21:50] » respectfully. I said, so I also with
everything that I handed you guys, this
[21:55] is straight out of our uh covenants and
bylaws and it kind of directly ties in
[22:01] with what this right here document says.
So, I want to make certain that you had
[22:06] all the information that you needed. A
couple questions that I had for them,
[22:09] not knowing what I know now, is
on their website, which is fabulous.
[22:15] They got a really nice website. I mean,
it was not something that you would see
[22:20] on Facebook, somebody wanting to watch
children, but it says they care for up
[22:24] to 10. Well, the license that they were
applying for is a limited,
[22:30] but in the application they were saying
six, which would make it a general
[22:35] instead of a limited condition where
it's four or less children. So, that was
[22:40] one thing. Playing outdoors, they have
no fenced in area there. And they back
[22:46] up to one of the two entrances, main
entrances into our neighborhood, which
[22:51] is uh Timber Meadows.
My concerns are
[22:58] we have a swimming pool. We have a a
walking trail that goes all the way
[23:03] around. What happens if they take the
kids out and somebody falls and gets
[23:07] hurt?
>> You put one minute, please.
[23:09] » Yeah.
>> On the clock.
[23:10] » So, I I'll just keep it just where we're
at right here. Everything that I have in
[23:14] the document was gleaned out of just one
provision that seemed to have uh a lot
[23:21] of different things in it. And I
certainly hope that you guys, you know,
[23:25] based on what I just heard, if this is
temporary, this could be a m a moot uh
[23:32] situation that we have right now. If
that is in case the fact,
[23:37] okay? Because right now, uh the
neighbors that are here, we're not in
[23:42] favor of having a daycare in our
culde-sac.
[23:48] » Thank you, sir. You have been hurt.
>> Hey, thank you.
[23:52] Is there anyone else that would like to
speak in opposition to this project?
[24:01] » All right. Seeing none and hearing none,
I will close the public comment section
[24:04] of this public hearing. Anything else
for staff up here?
[24:09] » Chairman.
>> Yes.
[24:11] » Over here. [laughter]
>> Sorry, Chris. Throw you off. Uh, I just
[24:15] wanted to put on record that the
resident letter that was sent out, um,
[24:21] the applicant has been found to be in
substantial compliance with our posting
[24:24] requirements, um, with a correct public
notice and posting on the their site.
[24:32] Um, however, the resident letter that
was sent out had the wrong dates. So, we
[24:36] will be uh reissuing a new uh resident
letter with the correct city council
[24:41] date before next week. So this will not
be heard
[24:44] » a little bit.
>> So a new res a correct resident letter
[24:49] will be sent out with the correct city
council date.
[24:52] However, they were found in substantial
compliance with our posting requirements
[24:57] for the conditional use. So they are
able to move forward.
[25:02] » So the council will hear it in two weeks
>> Yeah. And um
[25:09] in regards to 185 foot notification
rule,
[25:12] » please clarify that. My understanding is
that that's like a state rule, a state
[25:15] law.
>> Yes.
[25:16] » So it's not the city of Blue Springs
that limits that. It's a state statute
[25:20] that municipalities follow.
>> So if if if that's a concern that can be
[25:24] taken up with the state, but the city of
Blue Springs is following the state
[25:27] statute.
[25:31] » Yes. Down here.
>> Yeah, I have a question. I was going to
[25:35] ask were there any other letters sent
out uh against this?
[25:39] » No
[25:42] chair.
>> Yes.
[25:43] » Yeah.
>> We we close the public comment section.
[25:50] » So I have a couple questions. One is I
guess I'm not I haven't run into this
[25:55] before, but when if there are
restrictions in a homeowners
[25:59] association, how does that work on
conditional use permits? We don't um
[26:03] carry out HOA bylaws. So that would be
between the HOA and the applicant.
[26:08] » Okay.
>> And for clarity on the limited versus
[26:14] general, can we
>> Yeah. So uh limited daycare use um for
[26:18] the city blueprint standards is a one to
four children. Um that does not require
[26:23] them to have a business license with the
city as well as state licensing. Um or
[26:28] we don't require them to present the
state licensing to us. um whether the
[26:31] state requires them to get one um I'm
not sure but at least for the general um
[26:38] to obtain a business license which is um
kind of where one of the conditions
[26:42] comes in that they have to meet all
state requirements which is kind of
[26:46] where the fencing that the the residents
brought up would come into play is
[26:50] they'd have to meet all the requirements
for the state to obtain state lensure
[26:55] and then they would be given a city
business license
[26:59] » and just to clarify If I just to be
specific this the application is for
[27:03] limited or is for general?
>> It's for general. So because so what
[27:06] triggered this is because when they
submitted the business license and we
[27:10] saw the number of children that's when
uh myself reached out to the applicant
[27:15] and we started this process.
>> Okay. Um
[27:21] I think that's my questions. Thank you
>> chair.
[27:24] » Yes. Um, so this temporary like you know
two months 60 days like can a
[27:32] conditional use permit be given for just
a limited period of time?
[27:36] » That would be Yeah.
>> Yes.
[27:40] » Can can I add something?
[27:44] » I'll defer to you,
>> Mr. Chairman. It really is if if the if
[27:49] the commission would like to hear my
testimony, you're welcome to. We will I
[27:53] will open back up the public comment
section
[27:56] » and I have
>> Let me finish please sir. We will limit
[28:00] any comments to two minutes and you must
approach the podium and state your name
[28:04] and address and you will be heard.
[28:13] » Robin Hoff stutter. Um if it's a
temporary and they are approved for that
[28:19] and it goes over what happens?
uh city staff takes that into
[28:25] consideration and they have to deal with
I'll let you ask that question.
[28:30] » And how many temporaries can you get in
a row?
[28:33] » So it [clears throat] would um after the
temporary conditional use permit expires
[28:39] or lapses, then they would fall into
code enforcement and we would start the
[28:45] process for issuing citation and
resolving the issue um to cease
[28:50] operations. Can you apply for another
temporary right after that one expires?
[28:57] » There wouldn't be anything that would
prohibit them from doing that. They
[29:00] would um
>> So it could be longer than two months.
[29:04] » That's what I'm
>> No, they would have to go back through
[29:06] the same process that they're going
through now um through a public hearing.
[29:11] » Okay.
>> Thank you,
[29:16] » chair. One more question. Uh or I guess
anybody else from the public?
[29:21] We open it back up.
>> Hi, Mike Anderson
[29:27] 9309 Southwest Orca Court.
>> So, a couple things that I wanted to I I
[29:32] mean, so the letter that we got that
said that it was a limited conditional
[29:38] was incorrect.
>> Correct.
[29:40] » Okay. Because based on the amount of
traffic in the mornings and at night,
[29:45] it's not meeting that criteria right
now. And just to state for the record,
[29:49] they moved in in December, late
December, and about mid January. This
[29:54] thing is opening and functioning every
day, every single day. So, are they is
[30:00] are they in compliance if they've opened
their daycare without the permit that's
[30:05] required to watch children? I guess
that's my question to you guys.
[30:10] » Answer would be no. This would bring
them into compliance.
[30:15] » Excuse me. This would bring them into
compliance,
[30:19] » but they could. Sorry,
>> I'm I'm a planner.
[30:23] » No, helpful.
>> I'm just filling in. [laughter]
[30:26] » Um, but they had four or less. Yes. So,
they need a permit at that point to run
[30:32] the business with that amount of uh
kits.
[30:35] » So, with them now wanting to go to six
or however,
[30:40] » um, that's where this is going to bring
them into that compliance.
[30:43] » Okay. Is there any oversight that
happens at this level to make certain
[30:48] that they are complying with those
things?
[30:51] » That would be with the state. This would
this is their
[30:55] uh where they would be bringing into
compliance. On top of that, it would be
[30:58] state that would be handling like the
operations and health and safety of the
[31:03] children and like operations and making
sure they're meeting all the standards
[31:07] that the state has set forth for
daycare.
[31:09] » Okay. So, let me ask one more question.
And so with the amount of children that
[31:13] they are watching today or that they may
watch in the future either in our
[31:18] neighborhood or outside of it on her
website she says she makes them meals.
[31:23] Does that bring in the Jackson County
Health Department to make certain that
[31:26] things are
>> You can speak before or against it but
[31:28] this is not a question. All right then
I'm done.
[31:31] » Okay.
>> Thank you.
[31:32] » Thank you.
[31:36] » Anything else from staff? Uh just uh to
reiterate as one of our conditions is
[31:42] that they would have to meet all city,
county, and state requirements set forth
[31:47] for a daycare.
>> Yes.
[31:50] » And also, as a side note, it's not
uncommon for somebody to be operating a
[31:53] business and not be in compliance
because they simply didn't know. I'm not
[31:57] saying that's the case here. And then
when they're brought to attention, as
[32:00] long as they come into compliance, we
see that all the time. And that's
[32:03] standard. It's not standard. It's It
happens. They happen to this frequency
[32:08] and there's a certain amount of grace
and and acceptance that comes with the
[32:11] fact that a lot of the public sometimes
just does not know.
[32:15] All right. Um,
anything else from staff? Any final
[32:20] words from the applicant?
[32:24] » Sorry.
>> Yes.
[32:25] » Mava from 9305. Um, I just want to
clarify that we are actively looking for
[32:32] a facility. We are we have an agent.
We've actually looked at a couple places
[32:37] in the last couple weeks. We are looking
to get out of the inhome daycare
[32:41] business and into a bigger facility
because it just makes sense for us.
[32:45] She's been in the business for 20 years.
This whole time, she's always been
[32:48] compliant with city state. She's never
operated under the table. None of that.
[32:53] I mean, me and my sister take that very
seriously. It's other people's children
[32:56] you're watching. You have to be very
compliant. That's why we're here. We did
[33:00] not know. And that's why, you know,
Logan's helping us, you know, go through
[33:04] this process and be able to be compliant
with whatever HOA needs, this, uh, the
[33:09] city needs, the state needs, whatever we
need to do.
[33:11] » And just to, uh, answer your question
about the 10 children, the website was
[33:15] built like six years ago. We just
haven't updated some of the verbiage.
[33:19] And, uh, I'll be sure to update that so
it says the right amount of children.
[33:24] » Thank you. Anything else?
>> All right. Anything else from any out
[33:30] there. I'm just going to make a broad
open. [laughter]
[33:33] » I'm done.
>> All right. Sure.
[33:37] » Okay. All right. I will close this
public hearing.
[33:41] I will bring it back up here. Unless
there's any further discussion amongst
[33:44] us commissioners, I would ask for a
motion.
[33:52] » So, I have a question. Is is one of the
conditions
[33:58] um limiting the amount of time that the
conditional use permit can be in place?
[34:03] » That is not current.
>> That is not a current um condition.
[34:08] » Okay.
[34:11] » Is that something that we need to amend?
>> It's optional if you want to or it can
[34:16] pass as is.
>> Yeah, you could make a motion to
[34:21] Okay.
So
[34:25] » everybody's doing
>> Can I attempt that?
[34:28] » Yes. Yes.
>> It's open for a motion from anyone up
[34:31] here. Chair, I will make a motion to
approve Monise Daycare CUPC0126-9786
[34:40] at 9305 Southwest Orchest Court with a
time period of 90 days
[34:49] um that the conditional use permit is
issued.
[34:56] » We can we can discuss this amendment,
can we? Okay.
[34:59] » Yeah. My thoughts on that is it needs to
be six months to a year.
[35:02] » Uh I agree in the sense that since the
applicant stated they're looking for a
[35:06] place, but there's so many variables
that go into finding a new home and in a
[35:12] commercial space. Uh there's financing,
there's availability, there's market
[35:15] conditions. I would uh I would make a
motion to amend that to one year.
[35:24] And what happens now? [laughter]
We're just ready for a second.
[35:29] » We're ready for a second on your
amendment.
[35:31] » On the on the amended motion,
>> chair.
[35:33] » Yes.
>> I second the amendment.
[35:34] » All right. I have a motion and a second.
Roll call, please. Shantel.
[35:41] » Commissioner Ingresol.
>> No.
[35:45] » Commissioner Pumprey.
>> No.
[35:48] » Commissioner Stokenberry.
>> I
[35:52] » Commissioner Richell.
>> No.
[35:56] Commissioner Sanderson.
>> Hi.
[35:59] » Commissioner Kra.
>> Hi.
[36:02] » Commissioner Graham.
>> Hi.
[36:05] » Vice Chairperson How
>> I.
[36:08] » And Chairperson Henny.
>> I
[36:15] pass.
>> All right. That motion passes and it
[36:18] will be heard by the city council.
They're meeting on Monday, March.
[36:24] » March 23rd. No. April 6th.
>> April.
[36:27] » April 6th.
>> Chairs.
[36:30] The motion. [clears throat] The vote was
on the motion and so now you need to
[36:34] make a vote [cough] on the
adoption of the cup.
[36:41] » Okay.
>> Right.
[36:43] » As amended. Right.
>> Okay. Now I would ask for a motion for
[36:48] the cup portion of this project with the
amendment of 12 month expiration on the
[36:53] CU. Ready for a motion?
>> Chair.
[36:57] » Yes.
>> I make a [snorts] motion to approve
[37:00] conditional use permit for Mony's
daycare zupc 01269786
[37:07] at 9305 Southwest Orca Court with the
amended condition for one year.
[37:16] » All right. Roll call, please. Sean,
>> I need a second.
[37:18] » Second, please.
>> Oh, yeah. Second. I'm all flustered. I
[37:22] have a motion and a second. Now we're
ready.
[37:24] » How about a roll, please?
>> Commissioner Graham.
[37:28] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Kradall.
[37:31] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Sanderson.
[37:33] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Richell.
[37:36] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Stokenberry.
[37:38] » Hi.
>> Commissioner Pumprey.
[37:42] » No.
>> Commissioner Angresol.
[37:44] » No.
[37:48] » Vice P. Vice Chairperson How.
>> Hi.
[37:51] » And chairperson Henny. Hi.
>> And that passes.
[37:55] » All right. That passes. That passed and
it will be heard by the city council at
[37:58] their next meeting.
>> April 6th.
[38:02] » Yes.
[38:06] » Sorry. For clarification, it's actually
it's not the next meeting. It's April
[38:10] 6th.
>> April 6th.
[38:13] » April 6th. Yes.
>> That's when we'll be heard.
[38:14] » Yes.
[38:18] » All right. Moving on.
Any other business up here. We have
[38:23] we've completed our agenda. Does anybody
have anything else staff up here? All
[38:28] right. I would ask for a motion to
adjurnn.
[38:30] » So move.
>> Second.
[38:31] » Have a motion to second. All those in
favor.
[38:33] » Any opposed?
>> Thank you. Thank you. This meeting is
[38:36] now
>> journal.
[38:41] That was good.