1
00:02:36,300 --> 00:02:37,760
I'm here, can I get a mic check?

2
00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:16,180
Good morning, everyone. We're going to get started in just a moment if you can all mute yourself, please. Thank you.

3
00:05:25,420 --> 00:05:27,260
Thank you. It's now exiting.

4
00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:46,520
Good morning, everyone. I am Christine Shory, purchasing manager and the meeting facilitator.

5
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:56,240
I would like to call to order this initial evaluation committee meeting for request for proposals RFP number P and C 2130378 P1.

6
00:05:56,240 --> 00:06:03,880
Professional Consultant Services for Building Projects at FLL and HWO for the Broward County Aviation Department.

7
00:06:04,540 --> 00:06:09,320
The time is 10.06 AM on September 2nd.

8
00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:14,440
This meeting is being held through Microsoft Teams, representatives from the county,

9
00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:20,200
are physically here in room 430 of the governmental center building east located in Fort Lauderdale,

10
00:06:20,420 --> 00:06:23,060
Florida, or they're appearing virtually through teams.

11
00:06:24,410 --> 00:06:29,490
Attendees, if you could please mute the microphones on your devices to limit background noise.

12
00:06:30,090 --> 00:06:36,990
This is a public meeting and is being recorded by Broward County that video recording will act as the official recording of the meeting.

13
00:06:37,670 --> 00:06:42,870
The recording will be made available in the purchasing division website under the RLI RFP repository.

14
00:06:44,130 --> 00:06:51,270
Information reviewed by the evaluation committee as part of their evaluation process will also be posted on the repository.

15
00:06:51,990 --> 00:06:56,970
This meeting has been publicly noticed. The purpose of the meeting is to determine the

16
00:06:56,970 --> 00:07:01,570
responsiveness and responsibility of the proposing vendors. Only those vendors that have

17
00:07:01,570 --> 00:07:06,050
been determined by the evaluation committee today to be both responsive and responsible

18
00:07:06,050 --> 00:07:12,250
to the solicitation requirements and then shortlisted may then proceed to the final evaluation

19
00:07:12,250 --> 00:07:17,730
committee meeting for presentations and ranking. At the time of the solicitation deadline,

20
00:07:17,730 --> 00:07:23,450
which was 2 p.m. on May 29, 2026, 11 proposals were received.

21
00:07:24,510 --> 00:07:27,490
Meeting attendance is recorded in the following ways.

22
00:07:28,030 --> 00:07:33,170
The purchasing division records attendance of county staff physically here in room GC430.

23
00:07:33,850 --> 00:07:36,410
All virtual attendees including county staff.

24
00:07:36,850 --> 00:07:40,990
If you could please click on the link or scan that QR code in the chat.

25
00:07:41,510 --> 00:07:45,470
It's currently listed in the team's chat section, and you can complete the sign-in

26
00:07:45,470 --> 00:07:46,350
sheet that way.

27
00:07:46,350 --> 00:07:51,070
And for any attendees that cannot access the link or the QR code from the chat,

28
00:07:51,370 --> 00:07:53,970
please email the Senior Purchasing Agent,

29
00:07:53,990 --> 00:08:00,530
Johanna DeFrancisco at yDFrancisco.org using the subject EC meeting attendance

30
00:08:00,530 --> 00:08:05,390
and provide your name, your title, and the company that you represent in the email body.

31
00:08:07,990 --> 00:08:10,130
The following are the county's project staff,

32
00:08:10,610 --> 00:08:14,070
Johanna DeFrancisco, Senior Purchasing Agent, Purchasing Division.

33
00:08:14,070 --> 00:08:18,210
Norman Schwartz is the Project Manager from the Aviation Department.

34
00:08:19,050 --> 00:08:23,230
Obere Navas and Alexander Williams are with the County Attorney's Office.

35
00:08:23,810 --> 00:08:27,410
James Vose is with the Office of Economic and Small Business Development.

36
00:08:28,110 --> 00:08:33,290
Crystal Goss is with the Risk Management Division, and Kirsten Ruse is with the Finance

37
00:08:33,290 --> 00:08:34,970
Division of the Aviation Department.

38
00:08:35,550 --> 00:08:39,650
We do have a core in present with the following evaluation committee members.

39
00:08:39,650 --> 00:08:43,630
Committee members, if you could please say present after your name is called,

40
00:08:44,190 --> 00:08:49,150
Stacey Montefusco, Expansion Project Administrator Planning Division Aviation Department.

41
00:08:50,210 --> 00:08:50,730
Thank you.

42
00:08:51,090 --> 00:08:55,730
Terry Crawford, Expansion Project Administrator of the Planning Division Aviation Department.

43
00:08:55,970 --> 00:08:56,290
Present.

44
00:08:57,010 --> 00:09:03,290
Thank you, Laura Soto Mayor, Registered Architect, Seaport Engineering, and Construction Division of the Port Everglades Department.

45
00:09:03,730 --> 00:09:04,250
What is it?

46
00:09:04,430 --> 00:09:05,050
Thank you.

47
00:09:05,430 --> 00:09:08,390
Jill Thompson, Construction Project Management Supervisor.

48
00:09:08,390 --> 00:09:12,550
Planning and Design section of the Parks and Recreation Division.

49
00:09:13,250 --> 00:09:13,410
President.

50
00:09:13,950 --> 00:09:14,890
Thank you.

51
00:09:15,150 --> 00:09:20,470
And Carlos Acosta Rivera, Deputy Director of the Public Works and Environmental Services Department.

52
00:09:21,250 --> 00:09:21,310
President.

53
00:09:21,830 --> 00:09:22,790
Thank you.

54
00:09:22,990 --> 00:09:30,370
It is the evaluation committees responsibility to review the vendors' signals to ensure solicitation requirements are met

55
00:09:30,370 --> 00:09:34,630
and to evaluate those submittals and make a recommendation to award a contract.

56
00:09:35,750 --> 00:09:42,630
Each evaluation committee member was appointed by the county administrator to serve on this committee based on their experience.

57
00:09:43,690 --> 00:09:54,530
The evaluation committee members are responsible for following the county's established committee procedures to select vendors which provide the services that are in the best interest of the county.

58
00:09:54,530 --> 00:09:59,950
At the discretion of the board, the evaluation committee members may be requested to substantiate.

59
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:17,480
Okay, their recommendation, and discuss their seminal reviews. In accordance with Broward County procurement code, each evaluation committee, member must affirm that they are free of conflicts of interest as provided by Part 3 of Chapter 112 of the Florida Statutes and the Broward County Employee Code of Ethics.

60
00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:28,040
All evaluation committee members, as well as the project manager, have submitted the required Broward County Disclosure Forms and responded that they can be fair and impartial to all vendors.

61
00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:41,240
The Cone of Silence has been, in effect, since the solicitations advertisement, vendors are prohibited from discussing the solicitation with the Commissioner's office, county staff or a member of the evaluation committee.

62
00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:47,700
The Cone of Silence will terminate once the awarding authority takes action to end the solicitation.

63
00:10:48,660 --> 00:10:58,000
During the cone of silence, inquiries regarding this solicitation should be directed to the project manager or to the director of purchasing and or his designation.

64
00:10:58,760 --> 00:11:11,360
Also, vendors may communicate with designated representatives from the Office of Economic and Small Business Development at any time regarding this solicitation's small business enterprise or county business enterprise participation.

65
00:11:11,360 --> 00:11:19,200
The summary of Ender Rights regarding Broward County competitive solicitations was issued in the solicitation.

66
00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:30,920
Broward County will be utilizing a consensus approach to provide a summarized group consensus evaluation score during the final evaluation committee meeting.

67
00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:36,540
At this time, the purchasing agent will report on the findings of responsiveness and responsibility,

68
00:11:36,540 --> 00:11:42,260
and identify if any exceptions were taken to the county's standard terms and conditions.

69
00:11:44,380 --> 00:11:45,280
Thank you.

70
00:11:48,580 --> 00:11:51,260
Proposals were received from the following vendors.

71
00:11:51,260 --> 00:12:00,500
Ramello, a general, and partners LLC, CSA Central Inc, EXP, U.S. Services Inc, U.F.T.

72
00:12:01,580 --> 00:12:08,140
Infrastructure Inc, Brisbane Smith, Gourry Methodic PA, HDR Engineering Inc,

73
00:12:08,420 --> 00:12:15,220
Justing Architects, PA, Michael Baker International Inc, Solts, Macdonaldsson, Architects Inc,

74
00:12:18,500 --> 00:12:26,500
The solicitation had to responsiveness requirements involving compliance, criminal, history, screening, practice, certification,

75
00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:35,800
lobbyist, registration, certification. All 11 vendors were found responsive to all the responsiveness requirements by the purchasing division.

76
00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:43,360
The solicitation had six areas of responsibility requirements, affiliated entities of the

77
00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:50,100
principles, financial information, financial ability, insurance requirements, license requirements,

78
00:12:50,460 --> 00:12:56,680
litigation history, office of economic and small business development program requirements.

79
00:12:57,180 --> 00:13:02,220
All 11 vendors provided the required documentation for the evaluation committees reviewed

80
00:13:02,220 --> 00:13:03,180
for responsibility.

81
00:13:04,220 --> 00:13:07,120
HDR engineering in initially did not disclose

82
00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:09,860
a case that was identified by the

83
00:13:09,860 --> 00:13:12,000
country attorney's office litigation review.

84
00:13:12,420 --> 00:13:16,980
In response to the 48-hour draft director of

85
00:13:16,980 --> 00:13:21,040
purchasing memo, HDR engineering submitted a

86
00:13:21,040 --> 00:13:23,720
revised litigation history form, including an

87
00:13:23,720 --> 00:13:24,960
explanation of the case.

88
00:13:25,420 --> 00:13:27,920
The country attorney's office acknowledges HDR

89
00:13:27,920 --> 00:13:35,340
engineering in response and considers it to satisfactory address the litigation-related

90
00:13:35,340 --> 00:13:42,160
issue. Additionally, the country-turned-office litigation-review memorandum identifies further

91
00:13:42,160 --> 00:13:49,120
explanations. Further explanation is warranted on the litigation history disclosed by

92
00:13:49,120 --> 00:13:50,820
BSA Central Inc.

93
00:13:51,140 --> 00:13:58,900
Gressham Smith, Gwary, Metary, PA, Justin Architects, PA, Salt, Nutrition Architects, and

94
00:13:58,900 --> 00:14:00,280
Stratistim LLC.

95
00:14:00,720 --> 00:14:08,500
In response to 48-hour memorandum, the Director of Purchasing memorandum, CSA Central Inc.

96
00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:13,580
and Gressham Smith provided additional information regarding the litigation history.

97
00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:18,160
Refer to the Director of Purchasing memorandum for additional information.

98
00:14:24,750 --> 00:14:32,450
The solicitation requires vendors to state whether they accept our county's standard terms and condition,

99
00:14:33,390 --> 00:14:39,610
or if they do not accept them to identify the agreement provisions and vendors proposed changes.

100
00:14:40,330 --> 00:14:46,490
Seven of 11 vendors accepted the county standards terms and conditions without exceptions.

101
00:14:46,970 --> 00:14:52,030
The following vendors initially took exceptions to the county standard terms and conditions.

102
00:14:52,030 --> 00:14:59,970
Ramello, Argymil, and partners LLC, GFT, Infrastructure, Ink, Resonance, Smith, Buryment.

103
00:15:01,180 --> 00:15:09,160
All vendors were given the opportunity to waive their receptions prior to the initial evaluation committee meeting.

104
00:15:09,620 --> 00:15:12,660
The following vendors waived all the exception state.

105
00:15:12,660 --> 00:15:20,660
Ramello, Jamello, and partners LLC, GFT, Infrastructure, Inc, Resonance, Smith, the Ramell2DPA.

106
00:15:21,940 --> 00:15:28,960
This concludes Richardson's remarks and is presented for the consideration of the Evaluation Committee.

107
00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:34,360
Thank you. Are there any questions before we move forward?

108
00:15:37,160 --> 00:15:44,480
Okay. The next order of business is to determine vendor responsiveness as defined in the procurement code section 21.4A.

109
00:15:44,680 --> 00:15:50,380
Is there any discussion from the evaluation committee regarding the determination of responsiveness?

110
00:15:53,320 --> 00:15:59,220
Seeing hearing none, may I have a motion with respect to the responsiveness of the vendor's submittals?

111
00:16:03,860 --> 00:16:11,840
Jill Thompson, I would like to make a motion to find all vendors as responsive to solicitations responsiveness criteria.

112
00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:14,200
Thank you, may I have a second.

113
00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:21,800
Please in my fiscal second.

114
00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:25,300
Thank you. All those in favor say aye?

115
00:16:25,300 --> 00:16:26,820
Aye. Aye.

116
00:16:28,870 --> 00:16:32,270
Aye. Any opposed? That motion passes unanimously. Thank you.

117
00:16:33,190 --> 00:16:38,030
The next order of business is to determine the responsibility of the vendors as defined

118
00:16:38,030 --> 00:16:43,710
in the procurement code section 21.40B. Is there any discussion from the evaluation committee

119
00:16:43,710 --> 00:16:48,250
regarding the responsibility of the vendors? Ms. Monofusko?

120
00:16:49,310 --> 00:16:57,190
Heather, I have a question regarding the financial responsibility based on the memo that was

121
00:16:57,190 --> 00:16:59,990
provided regarding Gesset.

122
00:17:06,380 --> 00:17:10,080
Kirsten, can you hear Ms. Monifusko's question?

123
00:17:12,740 --> 00:17:14,020
No, I was not able to hear it.

124
00:17:14,040 --> 00:17:15,700
Okay, I'll repeat it for you.

125
00:17:15,920 --> 00:17:22,940
She was asking for additional information regarding the financial review as it relates to CSA central.

126
00:17:22,940 --> 00:17:28,670
if she could get some more information on that. In terms of what?

127
00:17:31,170 --> 00:17:31,890
In terms of your

128
00:17:31,890 --> 00:17:40,090
right up about their financial ability, I don't know what the right term is. In

129
00:17:40,090 --> 00:17:43,850
your memo, you wrote about CSA essentially.

130
00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:50,960
Yes, they have a current ratio that's

131
00:17:50,960 --> 00:17:56,700
below one so that may indicate that they may not be able to meet their short term

132
00:17:56,700 --> 00:17:59,140
financial obligation does

133
00:18:04,260 --> 00:18:07,120
that help I mean yeah for the memo it says the company is

134
00:18:07,120 --> 00:18:12,300
in financial trouble as its obligations need its assets though there could be

135
00:18:12,300 --> 00:18:16,520
an issue like she said financial trouble with me okay

136
00:18:19,980 --> 00:18:22,580
any other questions before we

137
00:18:22,580 --> 00:18:29,360
move into the motion sure I want to clarify on the litigation component that

138
00:18:30,460 --> 00:18:35,840
stratus all that stratus was also a company that didn't provide any exceptions to the

139
00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:41,620
terms of the agreement, and even after the memo did not provide any exceptions to the terms.

140
00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:45,220
So we don't know where they stand with the terms of the conditions of the agreement.

141
00:18:50,440 --> 00:18:55,160
So the question is whether or not stratus disclosed all cases?

142
00:18:55,280 --> 00:18:56,460
No, not quick cases.

143
00:18:56,660 --> 00:18:57,700
Whether or not they had any questions?

144
00:18:57,700 --> 00:18:58,760
Oh, I'm sorry, exceptions.

145
00:19:01,200 --> 00:19:09,100
When the vendor does not meet a form declaring any exceptions, that's it.

146
00:19:09,100 --> 00:19:11,280
It means that they are accepted now.

147
00:19:11,620 --> 00:19:13,080
Thank you.

148
00:19:16,380 --> 00:19:23,500
Any other questions on exceptions or litigation history or financials?

149
00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:24,880
Any questions at all?

150
00:19:27,810 --> 00:19:29,670
Then hearing none of that no additional.

151
00:19:30,170 --> 00:19:32,990
May I have a motion with respect to the responsibility of the vendors?

152
00:19:36,740 --> 00:19:42,320
I would like to make a motion to find all vendors as responsible to the solicitations

153
00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:43,680
responsibility criteria.

154
00:19:43,680 --> 00:19:46,800
Let me have a second.

155
00:19:49,680 --> 00:19:51,040
Still Thompson a second.

156
00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:53,460
All those in favor say aye?

157
00:19:53,840 --> 00:19:55,240
Aye. Aye. Aye.

158
00:19:59,200 --> 00:19:59,960
There were none opposed.

159
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:01,660
Use that motion passes unanimously.

160
00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:07,340
So, the next order of business is to determine the vendors that

161
00:20:07,340 --> 00:20:12,680
were found to be both responsive and responsible. May I have a motion with respect to the vendors

162
00:20:12,680 --> 00:20:15,300
determined to be both responsive and responsible?

163
00:20:22,250 --> 00:20:24,550
I would like to make a motion to find all vendors

164
00:20:24,550 --> 00:20:31,790
as both responsive and responsible to the solicitations requirements. Thank you. May I have a second?

165
00:20:34,350 --> 00:20:37,830
Thank you, all those in favor say aye.

166
00:20:37,850 --> 00:20:38,370
Aye.

167
00:20:40,150 --> 00:20:42,490
None opposed that motion passes unanimously.

168
00:20:45,020 --> 00:20:49,200
So the solicitation specified that Robert County was seeking up to three

169
00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:52,940
professional consultants to provide the specified services.

170
00:20:53,700 --> 00:21:03,120
The director of purchasing recommends short listing in accordance with the

171
00:21:03,120 --> 00:21:09,600
and then score a rank only the shortlisted vendors or two score and rank all responses.

172
00:21:10,360 --> 00:21:14,760
Finally, in accordance with the Florida statute for Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act,

173
00:21:15,160 --> 00:21:22,440
there shall be no fewer than three responsible vendors evaluated. However, the evaluation committee

174
00:21:22,440 --> 00:21:28,040
determines the final number of vendors to shortlist. Shortlisting is based on the evaluation

175
00:21:28,040 --> 00:21:34,000
committee's evaluation of the vendors' entire submittals, including responses to the evaluation

176
00:21:34,000 --> 00:21:38,560
criteria. Is there any discussion regarding shortlisting?

177
00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:44,020
Ms. Thompson?

178
00:21:44,940 --> 00:21:55,480
Good morning. Based on review, I feel that 11 applicants, based on three slots, shortlisting

179
00:21:55,480 --> 00:21:57,300
could be a viable alternative.

180
00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:01,920
Do I need to recommend the number at this point?

181
00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:05,680
Yeah, that's what you would probably discuss the number.

182
00:22:06,160 --> 00:22:06,900
It's too short.

183
00:22:07,120 --> 00:22:09,600
I would be comfortable listening to six.

184
00:22:09,820 --> 00:22:12,200
I don't know how you feel about it as a using agency.

185
00:22:13,340 --> 00:22:16,760
I think we would be comfortable with either four or five.

186
00:22:16,840 --> 00:22:17,760
I don't know.

187
00:22:20,030 --> 00:22:21,670
I think five is okay.

188
00:22:24,230 --> 00:22:24,870
For three slots?

189
00:22:28,570 --> 00:22:36,710
So now you would, if there's no further discussion, then someone can go ahead and make a motion for what you feel is an adequate number

190
00:22:36,710 --> 00:22:39,670
for a potential award of up to three.

191
00:22:41,360 --> 00:22:42,400
Thank you.

192
00:22:44,480 --> 00:22:54,980
Terry Crawford, I would like to make a motion to short list five vendors to move forward to the final evaluation committee meeting for presentations and ranking.

193
00:22:55,700 --> 00:22:56,080
Thank you.

194
00:22:56,320 --> 00:22:57,160
May I have a second?

195
00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:03,260
Thank you, all those in favor say aye.

196
00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:04,220
Aye. Aye.

197
00:23:06,590 --> 00:23:06,590
Aye.

198
00:23:06,710 --> 00:23:07,970
Thank you, there were none opposed.

199
00:23:08,030 --> 00:23:09,530
That motion passes unanimously.

200
00:23:11,570 --> 00:23:14,570
The evaluation committee will now shortlist the vendors.

201
00:23:14,890 --> 00:23:15,910
This is going to just take a moment.

202
00:23:17,250 --> 00:23:22,210
Mrs. DeFrancisco is going to prepare the ballots and send them over to the evaluation committee.

203
00:23:22,470 --> 00:23:24,290
So I'll keep talking in the meantime to stall.

204
00:23:24,290 --> 00:23:31,210
The evaluation committee members will be emailed a ballot link to select the vendors to shortlist.

205
00:23:31,670 --> 00:23:35,450
The number of vendors to shortlist is a total of five.

206
00:23:36,390 --> 00:23:40,290
Once all committee members submit their shortlist ballots back to purchasing,

207
00:23:41,070 --> 00:23:46,230
I will briefly recess the meeting to allow purchasing sometime to tally those ballots.

208
00:23:46,750 --> 00:23:50,290
When purchasing notifies me that they have completed that tally,

209
00:23:50,290 --> 00:23:54,430
I'll then reconvene the meeting and purchasing will read the short listing results.

210
00:23:55,030 --> 00:23:55,890
Are there any questions?

211
00:24:02,410 --> 00:24:08,610
So the ballot is being prepared and will be sent momentarily if everyone can remain on mute.

212
00:27:09,870 --> 00:27:18,090
Committee members, you can now begin scoring and the purchasing division will notify me once they have received all ballots and are ready to tabulate. Thank you.

213
00:33:38,000 --> 00:33:49,820
The short list ballots have been submitted, and we will now take a recess. The time is 1033. We are now in recess. If you could please remain on mute, we should be back to you momentarily. Thank you.

214
00:36:13,420 --> 00:36:17,260
I'd like to reconvene the meeting. The time is now 1036,

215
00:36:19,380 --> 00:36:21,440
purchasing. I'm going to take down the

216
00:36:21,440 --> 00:36:27,960
meeting recess. And if you want to share the results.

217
00:36:27,960 --> 00:36:28,780
The

218
00:36:58,510 --> 00:37:01,690
shortlisted vendors are as follows.

219
00:37:03,050 --> 00:37:06,450
Vermello, Ajamell, and partners L.L.C.

220
00:37:07,550 --> 00:37:12,270
Grassham Smith, HDR Engineering Inc.

221
00:37:13,110 --> 00:37:17,690
Just in architects PA, Michael Baker International.

222
00:37:21,380 --> 00:37:22,040
Thank you.

223
00:37:22,220 --> 00:37:25,180
On the screen are the five shortlisted vendors.

224
00:37:26,080 --> 00:37:28,200
May I have a motion to accept the name

225
00:37:28,200 --> 00:37:30,560
vendors as those shortlisted.

226
00:37:42,260 --> 00:37:46,820
Bill Thompson, I would like to make a motion to accept the named vendors to proceed to final

227
00:37:46,820 --> 00:37:47,440
evaluation.

228
00:37:49,260 --> 00:37:50,220
Are you?

229
00:37:50,580 --> 00:37:57,520
I'm just saying, excuse me, we're going to need to put you on mute, we're in the middle

230
00:37:57,520 --> 00:37:58,160
of a motion.

231
00:37:59,160 --> 00:38:01,680
I'm sorry, Mrs. Thompson, can you repeat that?

232
00:38:01,940 --> 00:38:02,200
Yes.

233
00:38:03,140 --> 00:38:07,420
Bill Thompson, I would like to make a motion to accept the named vendors to proceed to final

234
00:38:07,420 --> 00:38:08,760
evaluation and ranking.

235
00:38:08,760 --> 00:38:10,920
Thank you. May I have a second?

236
00:38:16,180 --> 00:38:18,760
Thank you. All those in favor say aye.

237
00:38:19,500 --> 00:38:20,540
Aye. Aye.

238
00:38:21,440 --> 00:38:24,180
Thank you. That motion passes unanimously.

239
00:38:25,600 --> 00:38:30,760
The final evaluation committee meeting will be held on Monday, September 28th,

240
00:38:30,760 --> 00:38:40,560
in 2006 at 9 a.m. and will include vendor presentations. Now the evaluation committee establishes the length of those presentations.

241
00:38:41,420 --> 00:38:49,760
That time does not include an unlimited question and answer period. Is there any discussion regarding the vendor presentation length?

242
00:38:56,320 --> 00:39:03,240
15 to 20 minutes. 15 per forably.

243
00:39:06,260 --> 00:39:11,290
Okay, somebody want to make a motion as to the length.

244
00:39:12,410 --> 00:39:17,330
Jill Thompson, I'd like to make a motion to set the length of presentations at 15 minutes.

245
00:39:17,450 --> 00:39:20,630
Thank you. May I have a second? I will second.

246
00:39:21,350 --> 00:39:24,670
Carlos. Thank you. All those in favor say aye.

247
00:39:26,690 --> 00:39:27,690
Thank you.

248
00:39:27,850 --> 00:39:29,570
That motion passes unanimously.

249
00:39:32,440 --> 00:39:40,680
As established, each vendor will have 15 minutes for their presentation followed by an unlimited question and answer session.

250
00:39:41,100 --> 00:39:47,320
Additionally, vendors will have five minutes previous to their presentation to do their setup in the team's meeting.

251
00:39:48,160 --> 00:39:55,580
At this time, the purchasing agent is going to use a random list generator to determine the order of the vendor presentations.

252
00:39:55,580 --> 00:39:59,000
She's going to show that on the screen momentarily.

253
00:40:23,500 --> 00:40:27,360
Okay, here on the screen is the random list generator. Go ahead, Mr. Defrancisco.

254
00:41:03,040 --> 00:41:05,000
panel and partners LLC.

255
00:41:08,330 --> 00:41:11,250
Thank you if you can keep that up for just a minute, maybe maximize that.

256
00:41:12,510 --> 00:41:16,610
Committee members, is there any other business that needs to be discussed today?

257
00:41:20,000 --> 00:41:21,240
I want to thank

258
00:41:21,240 --> 00:41:26,040
all of the vendors that responded to our solicitation. We appreciate your time and interest in

259
00:41:26,040 --> 00:41:33,720
working with Broward County. The time is 1041 AM and this initial evaluation committee meeting is a

260
00:41:33,720 --> 00:41:35,120
Thank you.