1 00:00:06,580 --> 00:00:23,900 Hello and welcome to the August 24th, 2026 Advisory Plan Commission for the Town of Brownsburg. We'll officially call this meeting to order, and we do have a quorum with six members present, and Mr. Scaldon is absent today. Please rise for a moment of silence and a pledge of allegiance. 2 00:00:23,900 --> 00:00:24,780 The 3 00:00:43,430 --> 00:00:53,950 United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands for one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 4 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:03,120 All right, thank you. 5 00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:08,340 Our first order of business will be the election of officers, staff. 6 00:01:11,410 --> 00:01:11,570 Yes. 7 00:01:13,370 --> 00:01:18,730 So, Jessica Herring, she'll be taking over for Lindsay Breone. 8 00:01:18,730 --> 00:01:23,230 As the recording secretary for the rest of 2026, 9 00:01:26,300 --> 00:01:29,360 starting in September, starting in September. 10 00:01:32,200 --> 00:01:33,000 Okay, is there a nomination? 11 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:38,660 I guess if we need a nomination in a second for that. 12 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:49,860 Mr. Miller, I'd like to nominate, sorry, as a hearing, Jessica Herring. 13 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:50,480 Jessica Herring. 14 00:01:50,740 --> 00:01:51,140 Thank you. 15 00:01:51,140 --> 00:01:53,480 for a recording secretary. 16 00:01:54,220 --> 00:01:54,780 Second. 17 00:01:56,180 --> 00:01:57,300 Any discussion? 18 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:00,780 Will Lindsay still be available as a backup in her absence? 19 00:02:03,940 --> 00:02:04,560 Okay, thank you. 20 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:09,300 All those in favor? 21 00:02:09,740 --> 00:02:10,940 Please respond with aye. 22 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:12,020 Aye. 23 00:02:12,780 --> 00:02:13,840 All those opposed with nay? 24 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:16,760 Motion passes. 25 00:02:23,220 --> 00:02:23,880 All right, next door. 26 00:02:24,460 --> 00:02:26,680 Item is the approval of previous meeting minutes 27 00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:29,740 from the July 27th, 2026 regular meeting. 28 00:02:30,860 --> 00:02:33,800 Any discussions, comments, clarifications? 29 00:02:39,950 --> 00:02:44,990 I'd like to make a motion to approve the July 27, 2026 regular meeting minutes. 30 00:02:45,270 --> 00:02:45,630 Second. 31 00:02:48,260 --> 00:02:48,960 All those in favor? 32 00:02:50,140 --> 00:02:50,420 Aye. 33 00:02:51,780 --> 00:02:52,480 All those opposed? 34 00:02:53,840 --> 00:02:54,680 Motion passes. 35 00:02:59,320 --> 00:02:59,540 All right. 36 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:07,460 Next up, approval of finding a fact and reports of determination for PSDP-26-12. 37 00:03:07,460 --> 00:03:19,200 Low cost, spay and neuter clinic, parking lot addition, development plan review, and PSDP-26-13, gateway 74, development plan review. 38 00:03:19,860 --> 00:03:20,940 Any discussion? 39 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:27,980 I'd like to make a motion that we approve the findings of facts and report to determination. 40 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:34,180 And PSDP-26-12 and DSDP-26-13. 41 00:03:34,900 --> 00:03:37,500 Was that PSDP-26-13? 42 00:03:37,500 --> 00:03:42,220 I mean yes, all right. Thank you. Second. All right. 43 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:45,720 It's a motion in a second. All those in favor, please respond with aye. 44 00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:49,820 Aye. Those opposed? All right. Thank you. 45 00:03:53,350 --> 00:03:56,150 All right. Next up hearing of requests for contingencies. 46 00:03:56,390 --> 00:04:00,490 We have none and development plan approval requests. 47 00:04:00,490 --> 00:04:01,930 Yes, Steph. 48 00:04:03,030 --> 00:04:09,990 Sorry, I'll, for PSDP-26-14, Lyons Transink Development Plan Review. 49 00:04:10,870 --> 00:04:17,630 All right, so this is PSDP-26-14, Lyons Transink Development Plan Review. 50 00:04:28,050 --> 00:04:34,810 Okay, so, this consistent with the comprehensive plan satisfies Chapter 2, zoning districts 51 00:04:34,810 --> 00:04:39,710 districts in Chapter 3 permitted uses, satisfies Chapter 5, site development standards, 52 00:04:40,190 --> 00:04:46,270 satisfies other applicable provisions of the UDO, satisfies Chapter 7, subdivision regulations 53 00:04:46,270 --> 00:04:48,890 as applicable, and satisfies construction standards. 54 00:04:49,490 --> 00:04:53,650 Development plan review, review for conformance with applicable standards of the UDO. 55 00:04:54,170 --> 00:04:59,410 Commissioners may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application based on conformity to the standards. 56 00:05:00,030 --> 00:05:01,770 So just a little history about this project. 57 00:05:01,770 --> 00:05:09,410 By keeping working with the owner since December to attempt to revise the site plan and better understand the functionality and intended operation of the site. 58 00:05:10,150 --> 00:05:16,610 Tech comments were issued in December and we subsequently held another tech review meeting based on the updated DPR plans. 59 00:05:17,010 --> 00:05:21,270 The applicant had to wait six months before being eligible to reapply following the previous denial. 60 00:05:21,670 --> 00:05:26,530 As part of the revision, the applicant did address several of the items previously identified by staff. 61 00:05:26,530 --> 00:05:27,670 So, 62 00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:37,000 for zoning, this is MS Motorsports, location 4005 North County Road 1000 East. 63 00:05:37,340 --> 00:05:45,900 This development plan is for a 2,860 square foot over the road truck maintenance building 64 00:05:45,900 --> 00:05:50,040 in a 900 square foot office building to serve Lions Transink. 65 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:54,420 The project does not require nor have any previous variances. 66 00:05:54,420 --> 00:05:55,640 So, 67 00:05:59,180 --> 00:06:04,480 for chapters two and three, the proposed used vehicle and equipment services, heavy is 68 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:11,160 compliant with MS zoning, development is below the max lock coverage, the maximum is 80%. 69 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:13,620 The project is at 70.2%. 70 00:06:13,620 --> 00:06:16,220 All high and setback standards are compliant. 71 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:21,800 For chapter five landscaping, the applicant has added the planting quantity that was required 72 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:26,400 along with the provided landscaping amounts to their planting schedule per development services 73 00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:32,040 Tech Review Comments for lighting, the maximum light trespass allowed for an MS-done 74 00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:37,440 district is 30 lux. The proposal does not exceed this by the property line. For parking, 75 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:42,620 the applicant provided 31 truck parking spaces, four standard spaces, and one 88 handicap 76 00:06:42,620 --> 00:06:47,660 space for a total 36 spaces that meets the parking standards. And then for vision clearance 77 00:06:47,660 --> 00:06:53,140 triangles, the VCTs are labeled on the applicant's newest landscape plan submittal. No instructions 78 00:06:53,140 --> 00:06:53,640 are present. 79 00:06:56,400 --> 00:07:01,860 The project is not located within Brownsburg's water and sewer territories. 80 00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:08,400 The site is served by citizens' energy in HCRSD. No special provisions that relate 81 00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:13,820 to the plant are noted for the site. Overlay districts are not applicable to this project, 82 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:19,760 and no additional waivers were requested as part of the DPR. However, there are still several 83 00:07:19,760 --> 00:07:23,360 All outstanding issues that staff has continually asked the applicant to address. 84 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:27,740 First, staff remains concerned about ingress and egress from the county road. 85 00:07:28,120 --> 00:07:31,820 It is still unclear whether any improvements to the roadway will be required, 86 00:07:31,820 --> 00:07:36,120 including acceleration and deceleration lanes, and how the proposed entrance will align. 87 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:41,500 Staff also does not believe that the truck traffic can be completely controlled through signage. 88 00:07:41,660 --> 00:07:46,180 While signage may help direct truck traffic, there is concern that the proposed truck route signage, 89 00:07:46,180 --> 00:07:50,520 particularly when combined with the public roadway signage could create confusion for drivers. 90 00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:57,520 This raises the larger question of how trucks will navigate into and more importantly out of the site. 91 00:07:57,860 --> 00:08:05,360 Given the potential for 30 or more semis on the property, there are also significant concerns regarding maneuverability including turning movements, 92 00:08:05,660 --> 00:08:08,620 parking and the ability to get trucks to circulate safely within the site. 93 00:08:08,880 --> 00:08:14,300 Traffic entering and exiting the property will also be competing with trucks already maneuvering within the site, 94 00:08:14,300 --> 00:08:16,780 creating additional operational and safety concerns. 95 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:23,900 There are also outstanding questions regarding the building details and overall architectural component of the proposal. 96 00:08:24,700 --> 00:08:32,120 While we understand the proposed square footage, it has never been clearly explained what activities will actually occur on the site. 97 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:37,700 Similarly, off the office building continues to appear on the plans in the back corner. 98 00:08:38,340 --> 00:08:46,020 However, there has not been sufficient detail provided regarding its purpose or how it will function as part of the overall operation. 99 00:08:49,310 --> 00:08:54,290 So for recommendations, the advisory plan commission may request conditions and 100 00:08:54,290 --> 00:08:56,650 commitments related to the project and criteria. 101 00:08:57,190 --> 00:08:59,630 Conditions or commitments must be made as part of the motion. 102 00:09:00,190 --> 00:09:06,550 Based on the information provided in the criteria responses, staff recommends a motion to deny PESDP, 103 00:09:06,550 --> 00:09:09,430 ES26, ES1 based on the following criteria. 104 00:09:09,730 --> 00:09:14,070 No elevations of the office building have been submitted to review for compliance. 105 00:09:14,330 --> 00:09:22,630 While renderings of the maintenance building have been submitted, no information on the use activities or business occurring inside the structure are available. 106 00:09:23,290 --> 00:09:28,190 And semi-triple traffic will have limited access to the site via County Road 1000 East. 107 00:09:28,190 --> 00:09:37,810 the site for north the south and access can only easily be from the west on County Road 400 to enter into the site. 108 00:09:38,610 --> 00:09:45,710 And on top of that, Wester provided feedback on the SWPPP indicating that the plan is deficient. 109 00:09:46,250 --> 00:09:49,870 And that significant deficiencies must be addressed before the project can proceed. 110 00:09:49,870 --> 00:10:13,510 Accordingly, the notice of intent should not be filed and no land disrupting activity should commence until the identified deficiencies have been resolved, and the SWPPP should be revised to clearly identify the total project area and total anticipated land disturbance, both express and acres and should include specifications for temporary and permanent stabilization measures. 111 00:10:13,510 --> 00:10:19,950 The stabilization provisions include a seeding in multi-plan, the 70% coverage requirement for 112 00:10:19,950 --> 00:10:24,510 final stabilization in the applicable seven-day stabilization requirement. 113 00:10:25,130 --> 00:10:31,250 Additionally, the SWPPP did not provide sufficient information regarding proposed runoff control measures, 114 00:10:31,690 --> 00:10:35,930 including the locations and specifications of grade stabilization structures, 115 00:10:36,590 --> 00:10:42,350 measures to be implemented for work within water bodies or provisions for erosion and sentiment control 116 00:10:42,350 --> 00:10:45,630 on individual building lines regulated under the proposed project. 117 00:10:46,210 --> 00:10:52,410 Deficiencies were also identified in the description of the proposed post-construction stormwater management measures. 118 00:10:54,170 --> 00:11:00,170 And including stormwater detention and water quality treatment requirements under the applicable local ordinance. 119 00:11:00,690 --> 00:11:04,830 These items should also be reviewed in conjunction with the separate technical review comments. 120 00:11:05,230 --> 00:11:12,070 Finally, the SWPP should include maintenance guidelines for the proposed post-construction stormwater. 121 00:11:12,070 --> 00:11:16,890 measures as well as complete operation and maintenance, manual addressing the inspection, 122 00:11:17,410 --> 00:11:20,390 maintenance and long-term operation of the stormwater management facilities. 123 00:11:21,390 --> 00:11:28,930 So ultimately, the question before us is simply whether the proposal can technically meet the applicable development standards, 124 00:11:29,110 --> 00:11:32,850 but whether this particular use is appropriate for this particular site. 125 00:11:33,590 --> 00:11:39,430 A use may be able to meet all the development standards and still not be conductive to the surrounding area, 126 00:11:39,430 --> 00:11:41,510 or the specific characteristics of the property. 127 00:11:42,130 --> 00:11:46,190 There may be other sites that could more easily accommodate this type of operation, 128 00:11:46,450 --> 00:11:49,850 because they have better access, larger roadways, signalized intersections, 129 00:11:50,190 --> 00:11:53,910 four-line highways, or other infrastructure designed to handle the associated truck traffic. 130 00:11:54,450 --> 00:11:58,890 Staff's concern is that this site is not conducive to an operation of this size and intensity. 131 00:11:59,930 --> 00:12:03,530 And this also gets to the distinction between zoning and planning. 132 00:12:03,810 --> 00:12:08,210 Zoning establishes whether or use is permitted and whether the applicable development standards can be met. 133 00:12:08,210 --> 00:12:16,310 That planning also requires consideration of whether the proposed use is appropriate for the specific site and the surrounding transportation network. 134 00:12:16,850 --> 00:12:19,510 In this case, the primary use appears to be truck parking. 135 00:12:19,770 --> 00:12:25,330 The building is a relatively small component of the proposal compared to the overall parking lot and truck operation. 136 00:12:25,330 --> 00:12:34,730 Therefore, staff's concerns are focused not just on the building itself, but on whether the site is an appropriate location for what is and affect a large scale truck parking operation. 137 00:12:34,730 --> 00:12:35,690 All 138 00:12:39,180 --> 00:12:43,240 right. Thank you. Any questions for staff at this time, Ms. Homan? 139 00:12:44,260 --> 00:12:47,480 Okay. First of all, what's SWPPP? 140 00:12:48,000 --> 00:12:50,420 I know what SW is, but what's the PPP? 141 00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:53,220 Stormwater prevention pollution blend. 142 00:12:53,660 --> 00:12:58,980 Thank you. All right. So, a stormwater review has not been done. Why not? 143 00:13:01,290 --> 00:13:07,890 So, Wessler reviewed everything from tech and the applicant is here to 144 00:13:07,890 --> 00:13:10,890 to answer additional questions regarding why that has not been done yet. 145 00:13:11,230 --> 00:13:11,450 Okay. 146 00:13:13,550 --> 00:13:18,710 You said that some might truck traffic will have limited access from a thousand east. 147 00:13:19,090 --> 00:13:19,290 Why? 148 00:13:19,930 --> 00:13:27,110 So, looking at the north of South Traffic, regarding the turn into the lot, there is currently 149 00:13:27,110 --> 00:13:32,290 no turn lane into it and we know trucks have wide turn lengths so that we see as a concern. 150 00:13:32,790 --> 00:13:39,570 In terms of going east to west on 400, we had discussed in tech review that that would 151 00:13:39,570 --> 00:13:44,910 be really the only easy way for trucks to get in without having to do a lot of maneuvering. 152 00:13:46,130 --> 00:13:52,090 So that is a concern we do have, especially if trucks are coming from 1000, they might 153 00:13:52,090 --> 00:13:56,190 not be able to make that turn very easily without any additional road improvements being done. 154 00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:02,180 All right, but they'd be taking a left into the property. 155 00:14:02,460 --> 00:14:05,960 They don't need that as big a turn radius as they do when they're making a right. 156 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:09,500 Well, if you're coming in from the south and you're trying to turn right, 157 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:11,760 that's a big issue that we see. 158 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:12,980 Oh, okay. 159 00:14:13,220 --> 00:14:16,720 I was thinking that they would come from Main Street after getting off the 74. 160 00:14:18,100 --> 00:14:18,340 Okay. 161 00:14:18,740 --> 00:14:19,220 Next. 162 00:14:19,940 --> 00:14:21,500 What's next door to this place? 163 00:14:22,140 --> 00:14:24,540 So just south of this is the Lucas Royale Raceway. 164 00:14:25,340 --> 00:14:31,100 there are a few vacant lots between here and there, but it's just to the south. 165 00:14:31,380 --> 00:14:38,250 All right, there's another property that has a bunch of trucks parked on it. 166 00:14:38,450 --> 00:14:40,010 What is that? Is that? 167 00:14:40,830 --> 00:14:43,850 That is predominantly truck parking. 168 00:14:44,230 --> 00:14:46,530 That is not up to our standards. 169 00:14:49,670 --> 00:14:54,910 And that is a concern we do have, if it's just truck parking. 170 00:14:54,910 --> 00:14:59,630 You know what is what's actually happening at that site all right, so yeah 171 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,040 That's that site to the north is a concern we do have for this. Okay, those are all my questions for staff. Thank you, miss someone. Mr. Gladley. You mentioned there's no acceleration or desolation lanes. Is there on up to add those as well? There are, but in the current plan, there are not any. If you look at the plan, there is there's a little bit of an improvement in terms of creating 172 00:15:29,040 --> 00:15:34,980 being better turned radius, but there's no official lanes there, and that is a concern that staff has. 173 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:37,640 Okay, thank you, no further questions. 174 00:15:38,740 --> 00:15:39,800 Thank you, Mr. Amphrys. 175 00:15:40,560 --> 00:15:43,480 Do you know the petitioner owns that property to the north? 176 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:45,840 Yes, they do. 177 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:48,180 And we have the owner of the property here too. 178 00:15:48,420 --> 00:15:48,820 Okay, gotcha. 179 00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:55,940 All right, and then one more of a clerical one, obviously the last point you made was very lengthy to understand that. 180 00:15:55,940 --> 00:16:02,500 But do we have an obligation to put all of the concerns in the denial request? 181 00:16:05,260 --> 00:16:10,540 To the extent that's the commission's motion, you can state for the reasons that set forth on the record by staff. 182 00:16:10,980 --> 00:16:12,560 That's all I got. 183 00:16:12,700 --> 00:16:12,860 Thank you. 184 00:16:13,460 --> 00:16:14,580 Thank you, Mr. Doin. 185 00:16:16,540 --> 00:16:18,360 I'll wait for the applicant. 186 00:16:19,620 --> 00:16:23,340 Mr. Peps, my question would be for the applicant also. 187 00:16:23,340 --> 00:16:30,760 So I guess I have one question on the entrance and the Excel decel lanes. 188 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:36,840 What do our town standards say you should be installed with this? 189 00:16:37,560 --> 00:16:39,140 Lauren, are you able to pull that up? 190 00:16:41,670 --> 00:16:48,070 Just want to add one point about the stormwater commitment language. 191 00:16:48,430 --> 00:16:53,830 Staff included that because as you've heard, this project has been reviewed several times and 192 00:16:53,830 --> 00:17:00,350 Lessler has reviewed it at least two or three times this summer, and still some of the items are not met. 193 00:17:01,030 --> 00:17:12,250 And so if there was a favorable recommendation, staff was just attempting to make sure that not only are they memorialized in the comments that staff has received, 194 00:17:12,530 --> 00:17:17,690 but also in commitment language because they are conveying stormwater offsite. 195 00:17:18,210 --> 00:17:21,730 So that was the reason for the sort of the lengthy paragraph there. 196 00:17:21,730 --> 00:17:22,710 In 197 00:17:26,710 --> 00:17:33,890 relation to the on-road improvements why Mitchell is looking here, one thing that staff 198 00:17:33,890 --> 00:17:41,310 is considered over and over is the amount of trucks potentially going in multiple directions. 199 00:17:41,950 --> 00:17:48,370 When the turn radiuses were addressed, we felt at that time we made a compelling argument 200 00:17:48,370 --> 00:17:54,630 that the applicant should look at on-road solutions due to the speed of traffic. 201 00:17:54,630 --> 00:18:00,890 on the road, but also because of aligning with the entrance across the street, making sure 202 00:18:00,890 --> 00:18:07,610 that people not only had time to slow down, but also were aware of turning movements on 203 00:18:07,610 --> 00:18:09,190 the, what would be the cross street. 204 00:18:09,690 --> 00:18:15,530 So we're continuing to look, but I think the genesis of that comment is that most sites 205 00:18:15,530 --> 00:18:23,210 that are proposing parking and truck traffic in tandem or separate would look at on-road 206 00:18:23,210 --> 00:18:29,970 improvements to not only slow people down but to make those turning movements less complicated, 207 00:18:30,850 --> 00:18:35,590 especially on roads that are not improved all the way down with the shoulder. 208 00:18:35,950 --> 00:18:37,730 So those were some of the thoughts behind it. 209 00:18:39,090 --> 00:18:45,450 Okay, I appreciate that escalation. I think that mainly answers my questions but 210 00:18:45,970 --> 00:18:49,150 if you want to follow up any on the standards or. 211 00:18:49,150 --> 00:18:52,730 So we just pulled them up. 212 00:18:52,770 --> 00:18:54,150 Lauren, I will just zoom in on that. 213 00:19:02,050 --> 00:19:04,230 Okay, so these are our standards. 214 00:19:05,450 --> 00:19:08,330 It's TR-16 in our construction standards. 215 00:19:14,900 --> 00:19:21,220 So to get into kind of the technical aspects to it, the front of this site will of course 216 00:19:21,220 --> 00:19:25,380 have a turn in, which goes to the gate, which leads back to the parking. 217 00:19:25,380 --> 00:19:33,940 But there's also a very large detention area covering about 40% of the front of the property. 218 00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:42,200 So it does meet the 100 foot minimum on one side. 219 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:45,720 It doesn't have to meet it on both, but it does meet it on one side. 220 00:19:45,860 --> 00:19:52,280 So in staff's mind, the appropriate standard would be to look at how to treat this on road. 221 00:19:52,280 --> 00:19:59,160 And I think our opinion is at least without having the engineer provide more information 222 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:05,240 to us that it meets the minimum standards to at least do deceleration and potentially 223 00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:10,620 a passing blister but we don't have that data so it's hard to make a recommendation either 224 00:20:10,620 --> 00:20:13,240 way but it wasn't addressed in any way on the plans. 225 00:20:14,660 --> 00:20:17,040 And I don't have anything else to add. 226 00:20:17,380 --> 00:20:17,680 Thank you. 227 00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:29,420 All right. Thank you. So I just just to kind of clarify it sounds like the concerns are kind of a lack of information, correct? Okay. All right. Thank you. 228 00:20:30,120 --> 00:20:37,040 If the applicant is present, would you like to step up and present? Please state your name and address for the record, please. 229 00:20:37,040 --> 00:20:45,250 He's my name is Scott Gilliam with Munch Engineering and my address, I'm 370 Monroe Street 230 00:20:45,250 --> 00:20:48,810 in Monroe, Indiana and the offices in Plainfield. 231 00:20:51,850 --> 00:20:56,250 But answering any questions, I'm filling in for Brian Munch, he's out of town today. 232 00:20:57,370 --> 00:21:01,310 So I'll do my best to fill in any of the information that I can for you all. 233 00:21:03,550 --> 00:21:10,910 As far as the passing blisters and whatnot on the roadway, I know we added in the ASL and 234 00:21:10,910 --> 00:21:17,090 DSL lanes on our side of the road to better facilitate the truck traffic turning in and out. 235 00:21:19,050 --> 00:21:24,350 I know we've got the drive aligned with kind of road 400, I believe, going back towards 236 00:21:24,350 --> 00:21:25,150 the warehouses there. 237 00:21:25,890 --> 00:21:50,270 So, from that standpoint, you know, anything above and beyond that, if you want to go back more towards the town standards, if those are automotive traffic standards versus semi-truck standards, I would imagine if we have to do something along the lines of semi-trucks, it may actually have to increase in those departments, but I don't know that you have anything set up for that in your town standards. 238 00:21:51,990 --> 00:21:58,310 I apologize. I don't believe that we've seen any plans with A.C.L. D.C.L. lanes. 239 00:21:59,470 --> 00:22:20,250 Okay. I'm sorry. I'm filling in. So what I know about the project in terms of the coming in and out for the entryways and whatnot, I know we I guess tapers would be a better description for them as opposed to A.C.L. D.C.L. 240 00:22:20,250 --> 00:22:24,050 So we had to better facilitate the truck turning radius 241 00:22:24,050 --> 00:22:25,450 is coming in and out of the site. 242 00:22:26,830 --> 00:22:29,450 And like he said earlier with the detention pond 243 00:22:29,450 --> 00:22:33,870 or detention pond on the site, there's not 244 00:22:33,870 --> 00:22:35,830 a lot of room to try and squeeze everything through there. 245 00:22:36,030 --> 00:22:39,930 So obviously with the truck traffic coming in and out, 246 00:22:40,550 --> 00:22:44,710 we're not looking at, you know, some eyes coming in 247 00:22:44,710 --> 00:22:45,810 and out of there constantly. 248 00:22:46,190 --> 00:22:47,710 It's overnight parking basically. 249 00:22:48,730 --> 00:22:51,430 the maintenance building would be for emergency repairs 250 00:22:51,430 --> 00:22:54,390 if somebody were to come in needing a tire retrad 251 00:22:54,390 --> 00:22:57,090 or something like that, they'd park overnight 252 00:22:57,090 --> 00:22:59,150 and move on down the road. 253 00:22:59,530 --> 00:23:02,410 And to your point, most of the traffic probably 254 00:23:02,410 --> 00:23:05,210 would be coming in off the interstate routing in through. 255 00:23:06,670 --> 00:23:09,790 So could we handle through signage probably, 256 00:23:10,190 --> 00:23:12,770 but as you know, most people are gonna be going off GPS. 257 00:23:12,770 --> 00:23:24,870 Yes. So, I think some of that there is going to be dictated by, like you say, signs or even stoplight potentially going into that intersection if we did something there. 258 00:23:30,730 --> 00:23:33,850 Do you have anything else to add or should we go with questions? 259 00:23:34,770 --> 00:23:36,230 You can go to questions if you'd like to. 260 00:23:36,750 --> 00:23:39,230 Ms. Holman, do you like to ask any questions to the applicant? 261 00:23:41,870 --> 00:23:49,710 The stormwater review, why haven't you provided the information regarding the stormwater review 262 00:23:49,710 --> 00:23:50,530 and their needs? 263 00:23:51,730 --> 00:23:55,290 My understanding was we had with this latest revision on it. 264 00:23:56,530 --> 00:24:01,630 I think the biggest thing was the ONM manual for post-construction measures, that's right. 265 00:24:03,930 --> 00:24:09,890 So a lot of that is just a case of trying to get to making sure that the operation for 266 00:24:09,890 --> 00:24:15,830 on a daily maintenance after storm events, that that information is made available, which I thought was in the O&M manual. 267 00:24:16,730 --> 00:24:25,610 Did I hear you right that you said that the parking area was mostly for trucks to park overnight? 268 00:24:26,250 --> 00:24:28,230 That's my understanding. That's what it's like, right? Yeah. 269 00:24:31,030 --> 00:24:35,150 Could you step up to the microphone and state your name and address for the record, please? 270 00:24:37,250 --> 00:24:42,010 Jigna Shah, owner of the property, address 2061, spring 271 00:24:42,010 --> 00:24:44,950 record, Aivan, Indiana 4623. 272 00:24:46,090 --> 00:24:52,390 Basically, truck parking needs is driver on the road, almost 4 to 5 days a week, comes 273 00:24:52,390 --> 00:24:56,270 on the weekend, park the truck over there, if they need a little maintenance. 274 00:24:57,110 --> 00:25:01,350 They leave the truck over there for a couple of days and then when it's done, they come pick 275 00:25:01,350 --> 00:25:02,130 up their truck. 276 00:25:02,130 --> 00:25:06,470 most of the time they use the Ronald Reagan and they 277 00:25:06,470 --> 00:25:12,410 come straight to the parking at the location of 4005 East 278 00:25:12,410 --> 00:25:17,190 1000 East. So taking turn is hard for them. So they're 279 00:25:17,190 --> 00:25:21,130 going to avoid taking those tarp done anyways. So they're 280 00:25:21,130 --> 00:25:24,870 going to come out from the property go straight to that next 281 00:25:24,870 --> 00:25:28,330 to the warehouse and go straight left or right to the Ronald 282 00:25:28,330 --> 00:25:30,830 Reagan and they have a traffic light over there. 283 00:25:30,830 --> 00:25:39,510 Okay. Well, I thought that you kind of sold this to us as a truck maintenance property, 284 00:25:39,770 --> 00:25:41,250 not a truck parking property. 285 00:25:42,070 --> 00:25:48,330 No, it is a parking and we have a small maintenance building. 286 00:25:50,430 --> 00:25:53,390 If it's get approved, it's going to get built. 287 00:25:55,170 --> 00:25:55,810 Okay. 288 00:25:55,810 --> 00:26:00,390 Okay, I knew on the property next door too. 289 00:26:01,210 --> 00:26:02,650 No, ma'am, I'm not. 290 00:26:03,850 --> 00:26:07,270 Why is the dumpster so far away from the maintenance facility? 291 00:26:11,060 --> 00:26:13,560 Just to make sure it's out of the way from truck drag. 292 00:26:13,660 --> 00:26:19,460 Somebody's going to, somebody's going to drag, change parts or whatever all the way over 293 00:26:19,460 --> 00:26:20,280 to that dumpster. 294 00:26:21,280 --> 00:26:26,160 Well, I think anything if it's stuck on the interior of the building, that's going in probably 295 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:31,420 collection bin and being hauled off separately as opposed to daily trash that's for that dumpster. 296 00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:40,800 Okay how many employees do you think you'll have? We have a two employee right now it's a 297 00:26:40,800 --> 00:26:47,600 once if this is approved how many employees will you have? Then the repair shop people maybe have a 298 00:26:47,600 --> 00:26:54,320 three to four and the truck driver is going to be whatever like however many trucks get parked. 299 00:26:55,020 --> 00:27:01,340 All right, and in an earlier iteration of this property, they mentioned putting a chain 300 00:27:01,340 --> 00:27:03,440 link fence all the way around the property. 301 00:27:04,520 --> 00:27:11,700 It's my understanding that chain link fence is not allowed around the property per the 302 00:27:11,700 --> 00:27:12,080 UDO. 303 00:27:13,600 --> 00:27:15,780 I believe that was the argument last time. 304 00:27:17,440 --> 00:27:23,080 And especially in the front yard where I imagine you want to put the chain link and chain link 305 00:27:24,200 --> 00:27:40,320 on this condition they moved the fence so you can see it goes behind the drainage so it's technically in the side yard now so they did alleviate that from their last presentation and on their back in February they had it as chain link with slats, which was not permitted so now I believe it's just 306 00:27:41,040 --> 00:27:45,560 well it still has chain link fence with private sleep slats on the bottom so that'll need to be addressed. 307 00:27:46,500 --> 00:27:48,220 All right that's what I'm addressing. 308 00:27:48,220 --> 00:27:48,340 housing. 309 00:27:51,220 --> 00:27:56,280 How long is the maintenance building that is for emergency needs? 310 00:27:57,660 --> 00:27:58,480 The size of the maintenance. 311 00:28:06,310 --> 00:28:09,830 Peers to say 130 by 22 feet. Does that sound accurate? 312 00:28:10,770 --> 00:28:14,890 All right. Do we need to put an embellishment on that building because of the long sides? 313 00:28:18,480 --> 00:28:24,080 Currently, we've only seen the same renderings you have. We haven't seen any architectural 314 00:28:24,080 --> 00:28:33,900 details for the building, so there are some things we can't say about blank wall limits until we actually have a permit set. 315 00:28:34,460 --> 00:28:36,840 Okay, all right, that's the last of my questions. 316 00:28:37,340 --> 00:28:39,060 May I say something? 317 00:28:39,800 --> 00:28:49,340 So for the office building, are the maintenance building, we didn't have any engineer work done yet because we don't know this is going to get approval or not. 318 00:28:50,040 --> 00:28:50,720 Any drawing? 319 00:28:51,560 --> 00:28:57,920 This is for approval, this is your development plan and this is for your approval so anything 320 00:28:57,920 --> 00:29:01,720 that you put on your picture I think that we should be able to ask you questions about 321 00:29:02,400 --> 00:29:05,220 including the office and how tall it is. 322 00:29:05,580 --> 00:29:11,860 So the office is in the future, we do not ready to put the office over there yet. 323 00:29:12,300 --> 00:29:12,560 Okay. 324 00:29:14,690 --> 00:29:15,330 All right. 325 00:29:15,770 --> 00:29:16,090 Thank you. 326 00:29:18,070 --> 00:29:22,630 I think if I can jump in for a minute, if you don't mind, it would appear that a lot 327 00:29:22,630 --> 00:29:27,970 of information is needed for us to make a decision on this to move forward with it at 328 00:29:27,970 --> 00:29:28,250 least. 329 00:29:28,730 --> 00:29:35,910 I guess with Councillor Staff, you know, it seems like continuing this may be something 330 00:29:35,910 --> 00:29:38,650 to consider so the additional information could be gathered. 331 00:29:39,490 --> 00:29:43,710 I know this has been ongoing for a while so I don't know where we are with the status 332 00:29:43,710 --> 00:29:48,310 if it restarted, if we could kind of see, just want to know what options are so we could discuss with the applicant. 333 00:29:48,690 --> 00:29:52,690 Yeah, you could certainly continue the case if that's the desire of the commission. 334 00:29:53,770 --> 00:29:55,810 Your other options are to approve or deny. 335 00:29:57,210 --> 00:29:59,810 To the extent you do continue it, I would probably ask that. 336 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:31,360 The commission gives specific direction as to what your expectations are for the information that needs to be delivered so that staff can monitor that accordingly to make sure that it's provided timely in advance of your next meeting. All right. Thank you. I guess. From the staff perspective, I think it's always a measured balance to continually hunt for information. If someone is at a point where they don't have 337 00:30:31,360 --> 00:30:36,180 of it to provide or are unwilling to go any further. 338 00:30:37,220 --> 00:30:44,900 I think that staff would just like everyone to know that we have asked for several things. 339 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:52,420 I've only been here since June the 8th and I've been involved in that and I know there were some questions before. 340 00:30:53,200 --> 00:30:59,620 So the commission is obviously the boss there, but just from staff's perspective, 341 00:30:59,620 --> 00:31:13,080 There's been no lack of trying to get additional information, so I think from our perspective we're willing to monitor if parameters are set. 342 00:31:15,670 --> 00:31:21,670 So it's clear to say we have provided clarity on what information is needed. 343 00:31:26,330 --> 00:31:27,130 I 344 00:31:30,460 --> 00:31:43,080 guess, for the applicant, would you consider us continuing this where we can provide clear follow-up on the information that's been requested? 345 00:31:43,280 --> 00:31:44,580 Yeah, absolutely. 346 00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:47,900 Okay, fellow commissioners. 347 00:31:48,280 --> 00:31:50,400 Yeah, that makes sense. 348 00:31:50,400 --> 00:31:52,820 If you're willing to, if you have the information you said you had. 349 00:31:53,600 --> 00:31:55,700 Yeah, that's going to be able to go down here. 350 00:31:55,840 --> 00:32:01,640 And I think some of it would be being able to sit down more face-to-face with everybody 351 00:32:01,640 --> 00:32:06,500 involved over here, as far as the tech reviews and stuff like that, and make sure we're all 352 00:32:06,500 --> 00:32:11,000 on the same page instead of trying to do stuff through emails and whatnot, and translation 353 00:32:11,000 --> 00:32:16,420 may get a little discombobulated on our end, but yeah, it would be more than appreciative 354 00:32:16,420 --> 00:32:16,820 of that. 355 00:32:17,620 --> 00:32:23,460 Okay, the staff have enough information we can provide a written. 356 00:32:24,120 --> 00:32:28,040 We have given them written tech review comments. 357 00:32:28,740 --> 00:32:32,040 We have sent them via email in addition. 358 00:32:32,780 --> 00:32:35,700 We have sent them the store model review sheets. 359 00:32:36,140 --> 00:32:38,420 We have sent them emails back and forth. 360 00:32:38,420 --> 00:32:42,940 We've met with Miss Gina twice outside of her engineers. 361 00:32:42,940 --> 00:32:56,000 I don't know what, it becomes a question of, we continually tell them what they need to provide, and we don't get it back. 362 00:32:56,220 --> 00:33:04,700 So if it's a face-to-face meeting, we can do that, but I don't know what more we can say that is not in writing. 363 00:33:04,860 --> 00:33:07,100 We're not negotiating development standards. 364 00:33:07,280 --> 00:33:10,380 We're not negotiating what is required for stormwater. 365 00:33:10,380 --> 00:33:16,960 We're not negotiating it. You know what I mean? So happy to do it. At the Commission's advice will do what means to be done. 366 00:33:20,830 --> 00:33:23,530 So will those answers be forthcoming? 367 00:33:24,330 --> 00:33:28,510 In other words, do you have the information and they've just chosen not to give it to us? 368 00:33:28,630 --> 00:33:33,910 There's like the stormwater information. We did get that in and as far as I knew that it was 369 00:33:33,910 --> 00:33:41,170 It had hardly been taken care of and sent over, but I may be misinformed on that one, so yeah, okay 370 00:33:41,990 --> 00:33:46,110 So it sounds like there's additional information that is ready, that hasn't been provided. 371 00:33:46,910 --> 00:33:47,350 Potentially. 372 00:33:47,570 --> 00:33:47,670 Yeah. 373 00:33:48,450 --> 00:33:51,270 Again, I haven't been the one involved in this project much. 374 00:33:51,410 --> 00:33:53,450 I'm filling in right now for tonight. 375 00:33:53,730 --> 00:33:54,730 I think that's another reason to. 376 00:33:54,850 --> 00:34:01,730 Well, I can take those concerns back to Brian and say, hey, you know, we need to jump on this and get this, you know, ABC kind of taken care of. 377 00:34:02,470 --> 00:34:02,710 Okay. 378 00:34:03,330 --> 00:34:07,870 I guess I'd like to hear from other commissioners if you think we should continue tonight. 379 00:34:19,310 --> 00:34:35,550 I'm not saying this yet, but just with the list provided, previously provided, or a new list provided, and before they can come back for one last, and then we need to get timing to within 30 days of whether the next meeting. 380 00:34:36,070 --> 00:34:38,630 Yeah, I think you can only continue to your next meeting, right? 381 00:34:38,830 --> 00:34:42,330 So I think the expectation should be that, to the extent the commission does continue the case, 382 00:34:42,530 --> 00:34:46,350 all information must be provided by the time the packets are released for your next meeting 383 00:34:47,630 --> 00:34:49,170 in accordance with the plan commission schedule. 384 00:34:50,070 --> 00:34:50,870 We have the option. 385 00:34:51,010 --> 00:34:54,770 We could say within the next two, or does it have to be this next meeting, is that? 386 00:34:54,770 --> 00:34:56,750 I wouldn't continue it beyond a second meeting. 387 00:34:56,870 --> 00:34:57,350 I would not do that. 388 00:34:57,430 --> 00:34:59,770 I would keep it to the next meeting, and then if you find out that you need to. 389 00:34:59,790 --> 00:35:01,250 Is Brian back in time to do? 390 00:35:01,590 --> 00:35:03,350 Yeah, he'll actually be back this week. 391 00:35:03,530 --> 00:35:03,710 Okay. 392 00:35:05,890 --> 00:35:16,370 Okay. Thank you. I feel like, I mean I know they're re-bring it forward again, but they've 393 00:35:16,370 --> 00:35:21,210 been working on it and it seems like there shouldn't be this much information we're waiting on. 394 00:35:23,650 --> 00:35:30,890 I feel like they're trying to get a parking lot and they're selling us on a maintenance building in 395 00:35:30,890 --> 00:35:35,850 office that they haven't, they haven't even designed the office because they don't know 396 00:35:35,850 --> 00:35:36,490 it's going to be approved. 397 00:35:36,730 --> 00:35:39,290 So how serious are they about those two buildings? 398 00:35:41,210 --> 00:35:44,010 And if they get, are they going to get built? 399 00:35:44,370 --> 00:35:48,090 I feel like they've had plenty of time. 400 00:35:50,030 --> 00:35:55,430 They haven't been responsive, so I'm continuing. 401 00:35:55,430 --> 00:35:57,870 Well, then let's continue with our questions. 402 00:35:58,590 --> 00:36:04,610 And then once we've all had an opportunity to ask our questions and we want to have discussion after that, then we can have a motion. 403 00:36:05,870 --> 00:36:07,490 Mr. Clarely, would you like to ask any questions? 404 00:36:07,850 --> 00:36:09,130 Sure, just one question. 405 00:36:09,750 --> 00:36:14,050 So you have 36 truck parking spaces, only four car parking spaces. 406 00:36:14,250 --> 00:36:17,910 What is the expectation about how the drivers will inter and leave the property? 407 00:36:19,810 --> 00:36:33,510 So normally when they come in the car and go to the truck, they reverse their truck, park their car on their truck parking spot, and they park their car over there. 408 00:36:35,620 --> 00:36:41,000 Okay, so there'll be a little bit of movement as they enter, about to move things around a bit as they enter and leave the property. 409 00:36:42,020 --> 00:36:43,740 Okay, no further questions from me. 410 00:36:44,820 --> 00:36:45,540 Mr. Jeffrey? 411 00:36:45,980 --> 00:36:46,800 That was mine. 412 00:36:47,540 --> 00:36:47,960 Mr. Dolan? 413 00:36:48,540 --> 00:36:49,520 No other questions. 414 00:36:49,520 --> 00:36:53,200 questions. Mr. Peps. My mind more answered. Thank you. 415 00:36:53,560 --> 00:36:56,460 All right. Thank you. I do not have any other questions. 416 00:36:57,900 --> 00:36:58,980 All right. Thank you. 417 00:36:59,320 --> 00:36:59,920 Okay. Thank you. 418 00:37:01,480 --> 00:37:10,280 All right. So this is a development plan review. So we have the option to approve, deny, or continue. 419 00:37:10,600 --> 00:37:13,400 I guess any further discussion before motion? 420 00:37:17,480 --> 00:37:26,320 I'd say give them another chance at continuing, but if they follow short of that, I don't know if there's a way to dismiss it. 421 00:37:27,480 --> 00:37:30,020 Or we just give them an, yeah, we just deny. 422 00:37:33,800 --> 00:37:36,380 In denial, do they have six months again to come back? 423 00:37:36,560 --> 00:37:38,280 Does denial create a six month window? 424 00:37:40,890 --> 00:37:45,590 I believe it's a one year adverse impact decision, so therefore they'd be out 12 months. 425 00:37:46,070 --> 00:37:46,250 Okay. 426 00:37:52,740 --> 00:37:54,460 There's no other discussion. 427 00:37:54,460 --> 00:38:02,800 I do have one question for Council, if we have a motion to approve or deny, and it does not pass. 428 00:38:03,500 --> 00:38:08,600 Do we have to have, does that indicate the other one, or do we have to take another motion? 429 00:38:08,860 --> 00:38:17,760 Not necessarily, depends on the nature of the first motion, but the key to it is that you need a majority of the entire commission to take official action, so it does require four. 430 00:38:18,080 --> 00:38:18,720 Right, commissioners. 431 00:38:19,520 --> 00:38:19,960 Thank you. 432 00:38:20,880 --> 00:38:21,600 Is there a motion? 433 00:38:30,920 --> 00:38:36,040 there's been no motion. The applicant did have something else she'd like to add with your consent. 434 00:38:37,740 --> 00:38:38,540 Any objection? 435 00:38:39,740 --> 00:38:40,600 Please stop up. 436 00:38:46,560 --> 00:38:50,860 Thank you. So we have been hired Brian for almost five years 437 00:38:52,160 --> 00:38:58,040 and literally I call so many time to Bronzeberg. I didn't get lucky to talk to anyone. 438 00:38:58,040 --> 00:39:05,880 Recently, I tried calling and Mitchell has been answering my call and since then, I have 439 00:39:05,880 --> 00:39:14,260 been forcing Brian to reply to all the requirement, Brunsburg has been asking. 440 00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:24,100 So I think as a property owner, I was not very strict with Brian, followed with him because 441 00:39:24,100 --> 00:39:28,180 Because each time I call his office or him, he will say, 442 00:39:28,360 --> 00:39:30,700 oh, Browns Berkeley, this, Browns Berkeley, this, 443 00:39:30,980 --> 00:39:35,480 and when I personally talk to Mitchell very first time, 444 00:39:35,680 --> 00:39:37,680 he say, there is no communication 445 00:39:37,680 --> 00:39:39,500 for almost a year and a half. 446 00:39:40,440 --> 00:39:44,520 So before you guys deny, if you guys can give me one more chance, 447 00:39:45,180 --> 00:39:47,340 now I know that what is the gap? 448 00:39:48,020 --> 00:39:54,080 I will try to go with Brian because I 449 00:39:56,380 --> 00:39:57,360 Thank you. 450 00:39:57,520 --> 00:39:57,620 Okay. 451 00:39:57,860 --> 00:39:58,580 Thank you. 452 00:40:01,020 --> 00:40:01,280 Yeah. 453 00:40:01,800 --> 00:40:02,300 All right. 454 00:40:02,380 --> 00:40:03,280 Good promotion then. 455 00:40:03,600 --> 00:40:03,820 Yes. 456 00:40:04,100 --> 00:40:04,780 I think we can. 457 00:40:04,900 --> 00:40:04,980 Yeah. 458 00:40:05,180 --> 00:40:06,080 That kind of does it for me. 459 00:40:06,100 --> 00:40:07,680 Because I've been in the situation before. 460 00:40:07,900 --> 00:40:08,840 I understand how these things happen. 461 00:40:09,060 --> 00:40:15,800 So I would like to make a motion to continue based upon staff providing a comprehensive list of 462 00:40:15,800 --> 00:40:20,380 what the information they need and facilitating one last face-to-face meeting. 463 00:40:26,280 --> 00:40:32,160 continue to the 28th to continue to the next month's meeting which is 464 00:40:32,160 --> 00:40:34,440 December 28th. 465 00:40:34,720 --> 00:40:35,460 Thank you. 466 00:40:43,560 --> 00:40:44,100 Second. 467 00:40:44,500 --> 00:40:45,240 All right. 468 00:40:45,460 --> 00:40:45,740 Thank you. 469 00:40:45,900 --> 00:40:50,960 So we have a motion to continue this case. 470 00:40:51,680 --> 00:40:54,140 PSTP-26-14. 471 00:40:54,740 --> 00:41:00,680 Lions Transing Development Plan Review to the next meeting on September 28th in this 472 00:41:00,680 --> 00:41:09,380 room with staff clarifying the needs and a face-to-face meeting with the applicant. 473 00:41:12,340 --> 00:41:14,160 So we'll take a vote. 474 00:41:14,440 --> 00:41:17,100 All those in favor, please say aye. 475 00:41:17,800 --> 00:41:18,200 Aye. 476 00:41:19,320 --> 00:41:21,000 Those opposed, please say nay. 477 00:41:21,520 --> 00:41:21,740 Aye. 478 00:41:22,580 --> 00:41:23,840 We'll take a roll call, please. 479 00:41:25,020 --> 00:41:26,780 Ms. Homan, in favor or opposed? 480 00:41:27,160 --> 00:41:27,560 In favor. 481 00:41:28,040 --> 00:41:28,500 Mr. Clayton. 482 00:41:28,920 --> 00:41:29,380 In favor. 483 00:41:29,760 --> 00:41:30,200 Mr. Humphries. 484 00:41:30,380 --> 00:41:30,740 In favor. 485 00:41:30,740 --> 00:41:35,220 I'm in favor, Mr. Paps in favor. 486 00:41:35,880 --> 00:41:37,000 Thank you. 487 00:41:37,140 --> 00:41:41,380 So the cases continue to the next meeting, 505-1, thank you. 488 00:41:53,560 --> 00:41:59,440 Next up is old business, which we have none, so we'll move to continued public hearings, 489 00:42:00,140 --> 00:42:09,800 which is PCZT-26-2 and PCMA-26-4. 490 00:42:09,800 --> 00:42:19,040 Croger zoning text amendment and rezone now open the public hearing at 642 staff. 491 00:42:27,940 --> 00:42:29,180 Thank you, commission members. 492 00:42:29,740 --> 00:42:41,100 We will present PCZT-262 and PCMA-264, the rezone map amendment and the text amendment together. 493 00:42:41,100 --> 00:42:52,860 The requirements for both of these applications are the same, and we'll serve to request a amendment of the plan unit development known as Heritage Hill. 494 00:42:54,520 --> 00:42:56,680 You will take separate votes on them. 495 00:42:57,980 --> 00:42:58,680 On the side, 496 00:43:07,230 --> 00:43:08,670 I'm not smart as the, 497 00:43:18,460 --> 00:43:19,600 that's what I tried first. 498 00:43:20,100 --> 00:43:21,080 Okay, thank you. 499 00:43:21,080 --> 00:43:21,940 There 500 00:43:27,820 --> 00:43:47,250 are state laws requiring you give consideration to the five criterion which we're going to discuss later in the presentation after we've gotten through some of the history above on this is an aerial of the site. 501 00:43:47,250 --> 00:43:58,330 This is a 12.1 acre site located at the south-west corner of north-view, I mean north-field and green street. 502 00:43:59,050 --> 00:44:05,750 I want to talk for a minute about the totality of the proposal and a plan unit development. 503 00:44:05,750 --> 00:44:16,410 And PUD is the development of a mix of zoning classifications, densities and uses under a common classification. 504 00:44:17,030 --> 00:44:22,190 And it should also include development standards as it does become the ordinance. 505 00:44:22,570 --> 00:44:29,650 There have been a lot of comments about variances and because they write in their development standards, 506 00:44:29,650 --> 00:44:36,290 This is what they have to live up to is whatever is in that DP statement, and that's recorded document. 507 00:44:36,950 --> 00:44:40,970 So basically, this is a custom zoning situation. 508 00:44:42,770 --> 00:44:48,150 In the history, this, I'm 509 00:44:50,480 --> 00:44:53,000 going to go to the, oh, there we go, sorry. 510 00:44:53,000 --> 00:44:59,640 Okay, this was part of a property zoned 270. 511 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:29,520 6.3 acres originally in the Hendrix County jurisdiction. And then in 2010, it was annexed and rezoned as a PUD for the town of Brownsburg. The history shows the PUD has been provided various densities of residential development and commercial development. The application filed in 2010 includes the amount that's on the overhead in front of you that labels this property as Camargo commercial. 512 00:45:29,520 --> 00:45:38,920 However, the written and recorded development statement references a in-text, a commercial 513 00:45:38,920 --> 00:45:43,040 component as section 6 heritage crossing. 514 00:45:43,640 --> 00:45:50,780 But this recorded document did not include this conceptual plan nor indicate legal descriptions 515 00:45:50,780 --> 00:45:59,120 for each of the areas within the planning unit development or even acreages for each section 516 00:45:59,120 --> 00:46:02,660 and to try to identify what use was where. 517 00:46:04,240 --> 00:46:06,920 However, this should be noted. 518 00:46:07,140 --> 00:46:12,380 We have found a deed for this 12.1 acres. 519 00:46:12,820 --> 00:46:18,160 The original applicant in 2010 was Rolling Hills, LLC. 520 00:46:19,120 --> 00:46:25,520 In 2013, I believe, they deeded this 12.1 acres 521 00:46:25,520 --> 00:46:32,780 to Heritage Hills LLC, which is what is referenced in the written development statement. 522 00:46:33,560 --> 00:46:39,840 And also a note is that this property has been taxed as commercial property since 2012. 523 00:46:40,500 --> 00:46:51,920 And then to finish up that track of thinking this property was sold by Heritage Crossing to the Fudge Trust in 2016. 524 00:46:51,920 --> 00:47:01,560 And with that, I want to make the point that this history on this is long, and it's complicated, and it's not complete. 525 00:47:02,460 --> 00:47:17,560 And so there are a lot of holes in it, and the applicants have filed the appropriate petitions to request this change and to add the development standards for this use. 526 00:47:18,380 --> 00:47:23,720 We can't fix the documentation that we have or the history. 527 00:47:24,240 --> 00:47:30,560 But we're here in 2026, the application is filed appropriately to try to change this 528 00:47:30,560 --> 00:47:31,560 plan unit development. 529 00:47:34,340 --> 00:47:37,420 This is the site plan with the landscaping shown. 530 00:47:38,280 --> 00:47:45,480 And while this is not a development plan approval because it's amending a PUD, the applicants 531 00:47:45,480 --> 00:47:54,320 of file much more detailed than is required normally at this stage, which would normally be writing the development statements and providing a concept plan. 532 00:47:54,980 --> 00:47:59,040 If approved, this is not the final approval. 533 00:47:59,260 --> 00:48:04,240 They would still be required to file for a plat approval and for development plan approval. 534 00:48:04,820 --> 00:48:11,780 This site plan shows 99,000 square feet grocery, 380 parking spaces, 535 00:48:11,780 --> 00:48:15,000 three loading spaces to the west behind the store. 536 00:48:15,930 --> 00:48:22,320 On the north side are pickup spaces for online groceries, as well as a drive-through pharmacy window. 537 00:48:22,820 --> 00:48:28,360 And then at the northeast corner of the site at the signalized intersection of fueling facility. 538 00:48:31,280 --> 00:48:40,640 This is a colored rendering of the landscape plan that demonstrates the areas of tree preservation, high intensity buffers, 539 00:48:40,640 --> 00:48:49,740 And the larger width of those yards than what would be required in our UDO on both the South and the West. 540 00:48:51,940 --> 00:48:56,840 I also want to point out on this, the same plan that you saw before. 541 00:48:57,300 --> 00:49:02,400 I drew on this plan, you'll see a blue line to the West behind the store, 542 00:49:02,540 --> 00:49:08,320 and it comes down and curves around the South-West corner of the store. 543 00:49:08,320 --> 00:49:10,760 That blue line is a retaining wall. 544 00:49:11,220 --> 00:49:14,720 Then the yellow line that parallels it comes down, 545 00:49:14,940 --> 00:49:18,320 and then comes across the south side of the property 546 00:49:18,990 --> 00:49:21,960 is the six foot proposed vinyl fence. 547 00:49:22,780 --> 00:49:25,400 And since the original site plan was filed, 548 00:49:25,600 --> 00:49:27,840 they had, Kroger has updated this 549 00:49:28,390 --> 00:49:32,740 and extended that proposed fence to the front line 550 00:49:32,740 --> 00:49:35,560 of the store that's shown in orange. 551 00:49:35,560 --> 00:49:38,360 So, those are what we have in play here. 552 00:49:38,740 --> 00:49:45,400 And then this plan also indicates three cross sections that the applicants have provided 553 00:49:45,400 --> 00:49:49,840 to demonstrate the landscape buffering that they are proposing. 554 00:49:51,880 --> 00:49:56,020 The first one section A, and this is closer to Green Street. 555 00:49:56,820 --> 00:50:05,500 And it shows you that there is a 28 foot high intensity vegetative buffer, and then 18 feet 556 00:50:05,500 --> 00:50:09,620 of tree preservation for a total of 46 feet. 557 00:50:10,000 --> 00:50:14,740 You will remember from the amendments we made to the ordinance earlier this year, 558 00:50:15,020 --> 00:50:23,060 we addressed high intensity buffers that are used just for this purpose when you have unlike uses come in beside each other. 559 00:50:23,320 --> 00:50:32,940 Such as industrial or commercial, next to residential, and it identifies whether you need a low intensity, medium intensity or high intensity. 560 00:50:32,940 --> 00:50:47,100 The width for the high intensity buffers range from 15 feet to 25 feet and then that depends on which option you choose as far as the number of plants and if you're doing offense. 561 00:50:50,870 --> 00:50:59,950 The next cross section is further west but still showing the property line from to south. 562 00:51:01,030 --> 00:51:07,470 Again, we have 24 feet of high intensity buffer, 22 feet of tree preservation. 563 00:51:08,030 --> 00:51:18,730 And you'll note on this plan, there's a black line at the bottom of the embankment there with the landscaping, which is showing the proposed six-foot tall vinyl fence. 564 00:51:19,330 --> 00:51:28,730 The red line in this drawing at the top of the embankment is what our ordinance calls out to have the landscaping on the outside of the fence. 565 00:51:28,730 --> 00:51:37,070 So, when they would, if they are approved and file a development plan approval, we would be asked them to move that fence. 566 00:51:42,010 --> 00:51:47,810 The next cross section is from the development to the west. 567 00:51:48,270 --> 00:51:58,530 And in this area, that landscape tree preservation, and then the embankment, you see the fence at the top of the embankment on this drawing, 568 00:51:58,530 --> 00:52:05,450 ranges from 80 to over 100 feet, depending on exactly where you are on the site plan. 569 00:52:10,220 --> 00:52:16,260 As I said previously, the state law requires reasonable consideration be paid to the following criterion. 570 00:52:17,160 --> 00:52:19,260 Criterion 1, the comprehensive plan. 571 00:52:19,720 --> 00:52:25,940 The comprehensive plan and the future loan use map notes this area as recommended for local commercial. 572 00:52:25,940 --> 00:52:34,100 And it also identifies as commercial on the business area planned within the comprehensive plan. 573 00:52:34,520 --> 00:52:37,600 The proposed project is in line with this recommendation. 574 00:52:38,060 --> 00:52:46,340 The comprehensive plan was adopted in May of 2019 and the map was last updated in September of 2021. 575 00:52:47,300 --> 00:52:51,480 Criterion 2, current conditions and structures within the district. 576 00:52:51,480 --> 00:52:57,340 There are a mix of uses in this area with single family development to the south and the west, 577 00:52:57,880 --> 00:53:04,080 multi-family development to the north, and commercial development under construction to the east across Green Street. 578 00:53:04,720 --> 00:53:10,260 The project includes a text amendment that details the development standards for this proposal. 579 00:53:11,120 --> 00:53:18,820 And the UDO, as I already described, requires that properties of budding residential development 580 00:53:18,820 --> 00:53:25,980 provide high intensity buffers specifically with from 15 to 25 feet in width. 581 00:53:26,520 --> 00:53:30,820 The proposed tax amendment provides a combination of tree preservation and 582 00:53:30,820 --> 00:53:35,400 additional plantings of varying widths from 42 feet to over 100. 583 00:53:35,960 --> 00:53:42,700 Along the south and west perimeters, providing a larger buffer and in some areas a solid fence. 584 00:53:43,540 --> 00:53:47,440 The architectural details include cast brick and stone veneer. 585 00:53:47,440 --> 00:53:52,380 The scale and materials are similar to other commercial uses that have been improved across 586 00:53:52,380 --> 00:53:53,140 Green Street. 587 00:53:54,240 --> 00:53:58,440 Criterion 3, the most desirable land use in the zoning area. 588 00:53:59,580 --> 00:54:05,660 The project is located at a signalized intersection and on a primary arterial. 589 00:54:06,000 --> 00:54:09,740 These are very important for commercial development. 590 00:54:10,360 --> 00:54:15,800 Since the original annexation and rezoning to PUD, several amendments have been made to 591 00:54:15,800 --> 00:54:17,460 this plan unit development. 592 00:54:17,920 --> 00:54:21,440 This is the appropriate process and 593 00:54:21,440 --> 00:54:25,660 the request is in compliance with the current land use recommendation and 594 00:54:25,660 --> 00:54:32,800 we feel the additional buffering and setbacks that have been incorporated in the plan help the proposal as well. 595 00:54:34,840 --> 00:54:38,940 Criterion 4, the conservation of property values throughout the jurisdiction. 596 00:54:39,820 --> 00:54:44,580 The project's not expected to have a negative impact on property values. 597 00:54:51,080 --> 00:54:59,820 Generally, property values across the jurisdiction are continued to increase across all development types. 598 00:55:00,120 --> 00:55:07,500 Even when located adjacent to single family, residential closer than the proposal in front of us. 599 00:55:07,880 --> 00:55:15,420 This proposal has incorporated buffering elements in excess of the UDEO requirements for the specific purpose. 600 00:55:15,420 --> 00:55:23,000 This and meets the permitting lighting trespass and design to eliminate light spillage across 601 00:55:23,000 --> 00:55:24,020 the property lines. 602 00:55:24,720 --> 00:55:29,560 Staff does not anticipate an issue with the conservation of property values. 603 00:55:30,380 --> 00:55:33,720 Criterion five, responsible development and growth. 604 00:55:34,260 --> 00:55:39,740 The project comes at a time when responsible development growth are at the forefront of all 605 00:55:39,740 --> 00:55:42,660 of your rezoning discussions. 606 00:55:42,660 --> 00:55:59,020 In general, staff believes this is not in odds with this criterion, given that it is in compliance with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan, and the elements that we have talked about as far as the setbacks and buffering and tree preservation. 607 00:56:00,140 --> 00:56:07,700 Commercial development along primary arterials provide a transition from the thoroughfares to the single-family uses. 608 00:56:07,700 --> 00:56:13,960 The access points have been located with no direct access to the residential neighborhoods. 609 00:56:15,060 --> 00:56:23,980 Commercial offerings to support residents are in the central component in the makeup and success of the town. 610 00:56:25,320 --> 00:56:30,080 The next slide shows the elevations proposed for the grocery. 611 00:56:30,080 --> 00:56:38,620 You will notice that the elevations on the west and the south have no signage proposed. 612 00:56:39,540 --> 00:56:46,560 This will further help to negate negative impacts. 613 00:56:47,320 --> 00:56:52,860 The next slide are elevations of the fueling center to demonstrate that the color pallet 614 00:56:52,860 --> 00:56:56,500 and the materials match the primary store. 615 00:56:57,860 --> 00:57:07,120 A traffic study was submitted and reviewed because the town does not have a traffic engineer. 616 00:57:07,580 --> 00:57:15,100 The town uses crossroads engineering for as a consultant for transportation studies and 617 00:57:15,100 --> 00:57:16,380 other transportation matters. 618 00:57:17,360 --> 00:57:22,200 They have indicated the appropriateness of the intersections, the traffic distributions and 619 00:57:22,200 --> 00:57:26,160 in the forecast, as well as the recommendations in the report. 620 00:57:27,220 --> 00:57:31,820 The recommendations and conclusion include five points. 621 00:57:32,340 --> 00:57:42,180 The first four are basically the design of each of the access points, three on Northfield and one on Green Street. 622 00:57:42,700 --> 00:57:51,000 The number of lanes, the Axel, D-cell, and extending lanes on Green Street with 623 00:57:51,000 --> 00:57:54,040 appropriate storage and tapered length. 624 00:57:54,540 --> 00:58:00,940 And the fifth recommendation is to optimize the signal timings at the current intersection 625 00:58:00,940 --> 00:58:08,080 of green and north field as well as the intersection to the south at 267 and county road 200. 626 00:58:08,980 --> 00:58:14,620 The applicant has indicated they will comply and facilitate all of these recommendations. 627 00:58:14,620 --> 00:58:34,000 This is a letter from Crossroads Engineering indicating again that the traffic distribution growth rates and forecast are appropriate as presented and the resulting capacity analysis on the selected intersections and recommended improvements meet acceptable performance standards. 628 00:58:35,340 --> 00:58:45,680 With that, the staff is recommending sending a favorable recommendation for both of these petitions with the following conditions. 629 00:58:46,200 --> 00:58:52,240 Compliance with all tech review comments, submission of commitments that address the traffic impact, 630 00:58:52,660 --> 00:59:01,000 analysis, recommendations and conclusions, and the approval of the findings of fact and report of determination by the plan commission. 631 00:59:01,000 --> 00:59:04,380 With that, I am happy to answer any questions. 632 00:59:05,680 --> 00:59:07,140 All right, thank you. 633 00:59:07,400 --> 00:59:10,420 We'll start with questions, Mr. Papsd, any questions? 634 00:59:11,280 --> 00:59:15,060 I don't have any at this time, that was very thorough, in addition to the packet. 635 00:59:15,920 --> 00:59:16,800 Mr. Dormit? 636 00:59:17,640 --> 00:59:24,160 On the west side of the property, you had the buffering and the tree preservation. 637 00:59:26,000 --> 00:59:34,940 Is there another piece of property then between the tree preservation in the houses or is that the tree preservation? 638 00:59:35,080 --> 00:59:42,220 There is the tree preservation and the buffering that I'm talking about is all on the subject 12.1 acres. 639 00:59:43,040 --> 00:59:50,160 The cross section that was provided, which I think they can probably speak to as well, 640 00:59:50,160 --> 00:59:56,620 shows the area between that property line and the closest house, but in 641 00:59:56,620 --> 00:59:59,680 between there I believe there's a parcel owned by 642 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:08,120 The homeowners association, and a part of that area, because it's a stream, is also a protected US water. 643 01:00:11,090 --> 01:00:12,330 On the one. 644 01:00:14,370 --> 01:00:31,450 On the parking lot, it had the right in and right out on the one entrance on North field. That's the furthest west intersection. That's really only for. That was the furthest one I thought on the diagram. It looked like that was the closest to North field. Do you have it that? 645 01:00:31,450 --> 01:00:31,510 Yeah. 646 01:00:33,650 --> 01:00:34,230 Maybe not. 647 01:00:34,250 --> 01:00:36,010 Yes, the one on the right hand, you're right. 648 01:00:37,210 --> 01:00:39,070 Why would that need to be a right in, right? 649 01:00:39,190 --> 01:00:39,330 I did. 650 01:00:39,410 --> 01:00:41,350 It looks like there's a median right there. 651 01:00:44,310 --> 01:00:47,030 So, why do we have to make that a right in? 652 01:00:47,110 --> 01:00:48,070 And then that, obvious? 653 01:00:49,950 --> 01:00:51,410 Well, people do silly things. 654 01:00:51,950 --> 01:00:52,070 Okay. 655 01:00:54,010 --> 01:00:54,590 I've seen it. 656 01:00:55,830 --> 01:00:57,310 That's my, that's the question. 657 01:00:57,670 --> 01:00:57,770 All right. 658 01:00:57,910 --> 01:00:58,470 Thank you, Mr. Doin. 659 01:00:59,050 --> 01:00:59,490 Mr. Humphries? 660 01:01:00,150 --> 01:01:09,010 Yeah, Elizabeth, I was wondering if you could confirm, do we have our own definition of local versus corridor and regional commercial? 661 01:01:10,210 --> 01:01:26,470 We do and I looked at that, I mean when you talk about local commercial in the comprehensive plan it describes that and a grocery store is seen as a local use because it's not like 662 01:01:26,470 --> 01:01:38,610 a huge mall that you draw things from the region, it is, and grocery stores have changed. 663 01:01:38,870 --> 01:01:41,210 They do have a bigger footprint than they used to. 664 01:01:41,630 --> 01:01:45,650 Many ordinances have changed how many square feet are there, but 665 01:01:45,650 --> 01:01:51,450 it is still a use that is seen by planners to draw from the immediate neighborhood, 666 01:01:51,710 --> 01:01:54,110 or people passing through the neighborhood. 667 01:01:54,110 --> 01:01:57,010 but it is not something that somebody's gonna drive 668 01:01:57,010 --> 01:01:59,810 from West Indianapolis over to this grocery store 669 01:01:59,810 --> 01:02:03,070 because there, you know, people want it to be convenient. 670 01:02:03,450 --> 01:02:05,050 You'd seem to go to the grocery store a lot. 671 01:02:05,190 --> 01:02:08,170 That's sort of the genesis of the changing. 672 01:02:11,700 --> 01:02:14,140 Please be quiet while we discuss this, thank you. 673 01:02:18,850 --> 01:02:19,070 Okay. 674 01:02:19,550 --> 01:02:22,610 I can speak, I mean, corridor commercial speaks more 675 01:02:22,610 --> 01:02:28,450 to their linear fashion, but we are on a primary arterial here. 676 01:02:28,450 --> 01:02:33,170 That's why you're seeing such as on a lot of our arterials and some of the other changes 677 01:02:33,170 --> 01:02:39,490 we've made as far as auto uses and those things that line up on a primary arterial. 678 01:02:40,070 --> 01:02:47,830 Regional, our uses are, our ritual commercial, our big box uses when you're talking about 679 01:02:49,990 --> 01:02:56,350 something that depends on the use they usually well over 100,000 square feet. 680 01:02:58,490 --> 01:03:00,070 But that's where we are. 681 01:03:01,430 --> 01:03:04,210 Give me an additional question, I'll follow up on that same topic. 682 01:03:04,670 --> 01:03:07,770 I just kind of want to ask them the local, so the local's not the business. 683 01:03:08,030 --> 01:03:16,810 It's you're trying to get a business that is used by just local residents, not out of town. 684 01:03:17,850 --> 01:03:22,130 Someone who's correct, there's supposed to be just for the close proximity, not. 685 01:03:22,130 --> 01:03:27,570 Yeah, it's basically providing daily shopping service needs and surrounding neighborhoods. 686 01:03:28,270 --> 01:03:33,630 And then it talks about a super market as a typical tenant. 687 01:03:34,450 --> 01:03:39,590 It does speak, it does go on to say typically that that would be under 50,000 square feet. 688 01:03:39,970 --> 01:03:47,370 But as I said, grocery stores have changed in what they are proposing these days unless your trader Joe's or 689 01:03:50,870 --> 01:03:56,370 small Walmart market area item, what they're called, but they have a smaller footprint. 690 01:03:56,490 --> 01:04:01,150 What I'm getting at is isn't the intent to be businesses that are just used by basically the community. 691 01:04:01,290 --> 01:04:04,510 You don't have people coming from outside the community to visit this business. 692 01:04:05,630 --> 01:04:09,530 That is my understanding and I think the applicant could also smile to that. 693 01:04:09,990 --> 01:04:10,550 Yeah, mine too. 694 01:04:11,090 --> 01:04:15,730 Would that mean like you're thinking of like a wholesale club that draws a regional base, 695 01:04:15,730 --> 01:04:18,690 not just the local community and surrounding community. 696 01:04:19,170 --> 01:04:20,490 Is that what you're trying to get at? 697 01:04:20,730 --> 01:04:21,370 Correct, okay. 698 01:04:22,050 --> 01:04:22,990 Okay, thank you. 699 01:04:23,090 --> 01:04:23,830 It's not a Costco. 700 01:04:27,000 --> 01:04:29,340 I had the same question. 701 01:04:29,540 --> 01:04:33,300 I think kind of looking at our zoning, 702 01:04:33,360 --> 01:04:37,320 where we have local versus regional commercial listed 703 01:04:37,320 --> 01:04:39,500 in the comprehensive plan, 704 01:04:39,980 --> 01:04:43,320 trying to kind of line that up with where that zoning fits. 705 01:04:43,860 --> 01:04:46,300 I believe C3 is our highest intents. 706 01:04:47,240 --> 01:04:54,420 I had this intensity commercial, you know, so kind of go making the assumption regional 707 01:04:54,420 --> 01:04:57,960 down to local would kind of be that C3 going to the C2. 708 01:04:58,660 --> 01:05:00,720 You kind of touched on what I was looking at. 709 01:05:01,720 --> 01:05:09,920 The retail in the C2 goes up to 50,000 square feet while the C3 is kind of the 50,000 square 710 01:05:09,920 --> 01:05:15,420 feet are over which, you know, I know this is the grocery store is kind of go with the split 711 01:05:15,420 --> 01:05:22,840 is 25,000 square feet. So I think there is something we, as they take away, probably want 712 01:05:22,840 --> 01:05:27,760 to look at with the UDO because we kind of have a mixed, mixed in our definitions of 713 01:05:27,760 --> 01:05:27,980 that. 714 01:05:32,320 --> 01:05:38,460 But, you know, I guess how do we, what will we see as when we're looking at local 715 01:05:38,460 --> 01:05:46,640 versus regional, but then we have, you know, with retail, you know, the size, how, how 716 01:05:46,640 --> 01:05:47,560 How should we look at that? 717 01:05:48,660 --> 01:06:04,700 Well, one thing I can say is in the development statement that was adopted in 2010, the heritage crossing that is detailed in the text, a grocery store is a permitted use and it does not refer to any kind of square footage. 718 01:06:10,770 --> 01:06:11,390 Okay, thank you. 719 01:06:13,930 --> 01:06:14,930 Sorry to jump in there. 720 01:06:15,030 --> 01:06:15,270 Go ahead. 721 01:06:15,270 --> 01:06:21,450 from any time. Okay, so my next one was noise pollution. We've seen time and time again, 722 01:06:22,250 --> 01:06:28,230 not only the light pollution is a concern, but noise. What are the controlling factors and 723 01:06:28,890 --> 01:06:33,530 determinations to restrain noise pollution to the adjacent properties? 724 01:06:35,840 --> 01:06:42,460 I believe that noise pollution is usually handled under, you know, a nuisance, you know, if it gets 725 01:06:42,460 --> 01:06:44,260 that's out of hand after, you know, 726 01:06:44,500 --> 01:06:47,300 quiet hours in a community that becomes a police matter. 727 01:06:49,080 --> 01:06:52,900 There's, you know, you can ask the applicant 728 01:06:52,900 --> 01:06:58,000 to speak to how their operations work. 729 01:06:58,060 --> 01:07:01,080 We don't have a plan of operation as far as hours 730 01:07:01,080 --> 01:07:02,880 or anything like that at this point. 731 01:07:03,300 --> 01:07:05,880 Right, so under our current rules and regulations, 732 01:07:05,920 --> 01:07:08,120 there's not really a whole lot under the jurisdiction. 733 01:07:08,360 --> 01:07:09,060 It's very general. 734 01:07:09,380 --> 01:07:10,100 Right, exactly. 735 01:07:10,100 --> 01:07:11,440 Okay. Thank you. 736 01:07:12,840 --> 01:07:13,900 Thank you, Mr. Klyly. 737 01:07:14,500 --> 01:07:15,920 Sure, I had two questions. 738 01:07:16,600 --> 01:07:19,200 The first one is around the current zoning. 739 01:07:19,320 --> 01:07:24,620 It looks like there's some inconsistencies, and you mentioned that this goes back a while, 740 01:07:24,820 --> 01:07:29,360 and I notice that the drawing would imply this is already commercial as do the property tax records, 741 01:07:29,520 --> 01:07:34,580 but then the text of the existing PUD does not speak because this is being commercial. 742 01:07:35,080 --> 01:07:38,720 Is there a piece of information that we should deemed to be controlling here, 743 01:07:38,720 --> 01:07:41,600 where we sort of have a little bit of conflicting information. 744 01:07:42,620 --> 01:07:48,440 I think the controlling matter is the recorded development statement that calls out heritage 745 01:07:48,440 --> 01:07:49,840 crossing as a commercial. 746 01:07:50,400 --> 01:07:57,120 So there was commercial considered in this, but the amount that they provided doesn't show 747 01:07:57,120 --> 01:08:04,720 that anywhere, and subsequent history, they did have a filing for a residential use on 748 01:08:04,720 --> 01:08:05,360 this property. 749 01:08:06,200 --> 01:08:08,760 But it never would anywhere. 750 01:08:09,280 --> 01:08:13,480 I mean, that's just the nature of when you have a development and 751 01:08:13,480 --> 01:08:18,320 you're the developer that you file to, especially in a PUD. 752 01:08:18,520 --> 01:08:24,020 That's why you see them amended so many times because somebody else comes in with a different idea. 753 01:08:25,840 --> 01:08:29,780 Okay, my second question was related to the ownership of properties. 754 01:08:29,780 --> 01:08:31,240 I read through the written comments. 755 01:08:31,240 --> 01:08:39,380 There were some people asserting or questioning whether Kroger has the authority to even raise this given that they're not the owners of the property. 756 01:08:40,120 --> 01:08:43,200 And I think I already know the answer to this given that this is fairly common. 757 01:08:43,780 --> 01:08:49,200 Do they have some sort of legal proxy or given that they have an option to purchase? 758 01:08:49,760 --> 01:08:52,600 Does that meet our rules or at least our accepted practice? 759 01:08:52,600 --> 01:09:01,900 Yes, they filed a consent from the property owner, the Fudge Trust, notarized and submitted 760 01:09:01,900 --> 01:09:04,880 to the file that allows them to file on their behalf. 761 01:09:05,380 --> 01:09:06,800 Okay, thank you, no further questions. 762 01:09:09,520 --> 01:09:10,300 Thank you, Ms. Klee. 763 01:09:10,760 --> 01:09:11,060 Ms. Homan? 764 01:09:12,340 --> 01:09:12,940 Okay. 765 01:09:13,120 --> 01:09:17,000 From the buffer picture, it looks like, 766 01:09:21,790 --> 01:09:23,130 is that the one you want? 767 01:09:24,030 --> 01:09:25,010 What's the other one? 768 01:09:25,550 --> 01:09:27,010 That's the South property line. 769 01:09:27,530 --> 01:09:27,990 That one. 770 01:09:27,990 --> 01:09:36,270 yeah shows Kroger's way higher than the neighborhood so did the other picture 771 01:09:36,270 --> 01:09:43,110 just wasn't as dramatic there is no stream there so are we gonna do I know 772 01:09:43,110 --> 01:09:48,150 that the people on the South property line get their backyards flooded at 773 01:09:50,900 --> 01:09:51,020 the 774 01:09:51,020 --> 01:09:54,700 time and if it with the with the higher elevation I would think that would mean 775 01:09:54,700 --> 01:10:01,900 more water from those impervious sources could end up in these backyards so 776 01:10:01,900 --> 01:10:03,160 So can we do a berm? 777 01:10:05,470 --> 01:10:08,290 I'm not an engineer. 778 01:10:09,190 --> 01:10:13,150 And when they came through tech review, most of the comments, 779 01:10:13,590 --> 01:10:15,350 because it's the rezoning stage, 780 01:10:15,550 --> 01:10:19,550 we're from planning, not from stormwater and those things. 781 01:10:19,690 --> 01:10:22,450 They will be required just like every other applicant 782 01:10:22,450 --> 01:10:27,650 to submit and own immemorial and a complete stormwater proposal, 783 01:10:27,870 --> 01:10:30,450 whether that's going to be underground 784 01:10:30,450 --> 01:10:32,090 or how they're going to handle that. 785 01:10:32,090 --> 01:10:39,830 and we will let the engineers that the Wessler will review all of that, as well as our professionals within the building. 786 01:10:40,150 --> 01:10:42,270 So that would be considered at the primary plan? 787 01:10:43,610 --> 01:10:45,870 Or the development plan approval? 788 01:10:46,030 --> 01:10:46,670 Development plan? 789 01:10:46,870 --> 01:10:47,110 Okay. 790 01:10:47,770 --> 01:10:51,810 I have more South Green Street exit entrance. 791 01:10:52,270 --> 01:10:53,970 How far away from the light is that? 792 01:10:55,750 --> 01:10:57,410 There's no measurement on the maps. 793 01:11:08,720 --> 01:11:13,500 That's probably a question for the applicant, because I'm not sure, other than what's shown here. 794 01:11:13,500 --> 01:11:18,800 it's over halfway from the middle of the lot but I'm not sure about the 795 01:11:18,800 --> 01:11:23,380 dimension. Okay because don't we have rules about how close you can and enter 796 01:11:23,380 --> 01:11:32,140 this? We do and those will review they are not they're not violating that. That 797 01:11:32,140 --> 01:11:36,760 we that you know of or we don't know how far away it is do we? I think it's 798 01:11:36,760 --> 01:11:42,420 greater than what is required from an intersection. Okay. We did have tech 799 01:11:42,420 --> 01:11:48,020 review and there were the street people who were there, street department. 800 01:11:48,740 --> 01:11:54,520 Okay, now there were some other things that were on here that I think require variances like their foundation 801 01:11:54,520 --> 01:11:59,920 plantings, the wall sign, the canopy signs, the number of canopy signs. 802 01:12:01,900 --> 01:12:06,740 Those are all written into the development statement as development standards. 803 01:12:06,740 --> 01:12:17,700 that was in the red line copy of the plan unit development statement that would become the ordinance, so they would not be variances, they are a part of this proposal. 804 01:12:20,280 --> 01:12:25,680 So the fact that they want their sign to be bigger and things like that is not a variance? 805 01:12:26,400 --> 01:12:29,900 It will not be a variance because this is a plan unit development. 806 01:12:31,420 --> 01:12:33,820 Oh, and they're allowed to do what they want. 807 01:12:33,820 --> 01:12:38,900 Well, they have to ask is part of what they're asking you to approve. 808 01:12:39,280 --> 01:12:41,920 This is part of what they're asking us to approve today. 809 01:12:42,500 --> 01:12:42,720 Correct. 810 01:12:43,660 --> 01:12:44,080 Good. 811 01:12:47,720 --> 01:12:48,400 All right. 812 01:12:50,500 --> 01:12:56,040 How many, do we know, do we know the nature of any of these trees that are on this outside? 813 01:12:57,940 --> 01:12:58,900 They're plantings. 814 01:13:00,160 --> 01:13:05,940 They have a landscape plan, but the specifics of that would be refuted at the development 815 01:13:05,940 --> 01:13:06,440 plan. 816 01:13:07,080 --> 01:13:07,280 Okay. 817 01:13:09,270 --> 01:13:13,590 And the loading docs back to the map, 818 01:13:20,520 --> 01:13:21,460 not that map. 819 01:13:22,480 --> 01:13:25,180 Yeah, that last map will work. 820 01:13:27,230 --> 01:13:28,210 Not this one. 821 01:13:28,850 --> 01:13:29,510 The one before. 822 01:13:29,630 --> 01:13:29,790 Okay. 823 01:13:29,930 --> 01:13:30,350 There you go. 824 01:13:30,690 --> 01:13:31,270 All right. 825 01:13:32,110 --> 01:13:34,570 I see where the trash compactor is. 826 01:13:34,730 --> 01:13:37,070 Is that where the loading docs are? 827 01:13:38,230 --> 01:13:43,250 The loading docks are where that red line is, they're just above that, where it's just above that. 828 01:13:43,430 --> 01:13:49,010 Okay, and I know that they said that they were going to have a trash 829 01:13:51,470 --> 01:13:54,530 compactor, but not a dumpster. 830 01:13:54,950 --> 01:14:06,170 There will be a dumpster at the fueling facility, but there's not a dumpster here because they keep the trash in the compactor, which is attached to the building, but there will be pickup from it. 831 01:14:06,170 --> 01:14:07,910 That was my question. 832 01:14:08,110 --> 01:14:11,290 If there's going to be pickup from it, wouldn't that be considered a dumpster? 833 01:14:11,910 --> 01:14:20,130 No, because it's pretty much inside the building, but I'm going to stop giving you any details, because that's a question for the applicant. 834 01:14:21,450 --> 01:14:22,330 Applicants, okay. 835 01:14:30,140 --> 01:14:30,600 Okay. 836 01:14:33,680 --> 01:14:35,600 They showed a couple of different things. 837 01:14:35,600 --> 01:14:41,960 They showed a monument with a sign on it, and then they showed the large big sign, like a big entrance sign. 838 01:14:42,480 --> 01:14:45,200 Which one were they leaning towards? Do you know? 839 01:14:46,260 --> 01:14:51,000 I believe one's going to be on green and one would be on north field. 840 01:14:51,660 --> 01:14:53,280 And they can do whatever they want with that? 841 01:14:53,540 --> 01:14:55,340 They can't do whatever they want with that. 842 01:14:55,340 --> 01:14:55,940 Okay, that way. 843 01:14:56,140 --> 01:14:58,360 They'd have to comply with what they've shown. 844 01:14:58,560 --> 01:14:59,680 Like this out this- 845 01:15:00,300 --> 01:15:27,960 Supply that's up right now, that wall sign that says croager is larger than what we would permit in the ordinance. But given the size of the building, it does not appear to be overstated or an abuse of signs. And if they had different tenants in there, they could have more square footages just couldn't be in one sign. Okay. So that's how we did the consideration. 846 01:15:28,720 --> 01:15:32,800 And the pharmacy drive up is on the south, correct? 847 01:15:32,960 --> 01:15:33,480 It's on the north. 848 01:15:33,980 --> 01:15:34,740 It's on the north. 849 01:15:37,520 --> 01:15:49,120 I think if you're looking at this, this, yeah, I think there was one drawing where they had flipped the labeling, but it's on the north. 850 01:15:49,740 --> 01:15:50,040 Okay. 851 01:15:50,540 --> 01:15:50,920 All right. 852 01:15:51,280 --> 01:15:51,780 That's all. 853 01:15:52,740 --> 01:15:53,520 That's all for me. 854 01:15:53,920 --> 01:15:54,520 Thank you. 855 01:15:54,720 --> 01:15:56,260 I'm taking up for Brett, by the way. 856 01:15:56,820 --> 01:15:57,340 Appreciate it. 857 01:15:59,120 --> 01:16:09,070 I have a few questions, I just want to confirm, I think I've got a little confused now. 858 01:16:09,210 --> 01:16:10,630 What is this site-zoned? 859 01:16:11,830 --> 01:16:12,630 It's PUD. 860 01:16:13,970 --> 01:16:20,250 Now, that PUD does not include any standards for a commercial development or grocery store 861 01:16:20,250 --> 01:16:20,690 currently. 862 01:16:20,930 --> 01:16:21,950 Is that accurate? 863 01:16:22,250 --> 01:16:29,130 It has very few standards, but it does have a list of permitted uses that include a grocery 864 01:16:29,130 --> 01:16:36,130 entry store for the Heritage Crossing is what it's called and it's labeled as Section 6 in the development statement. 865 01:16:36,510 --> 01:16:47,110 Okay, so if the applicant chose to just bring a development plan for this site as a grocery store, could they do that? 866 01:16:49,180 --> 01:16:55,420 We frown upon that, so that's why our direction was because there's so much 867 01:16:55,420 --> 01:17:02,120 on clarity in the history that they file both the tax amendment and the map amendment. 868 01:17:02,560 --> 01:17:08,480 Okay. Thank you. I just wanted to clarify some understanding there. 869 01:17:09,880 --> 01:17:15,600 Quick question, all the added buffering described that is included in the tax amendment. 870 01:17:16,160 --> 01:17:19,800 Yes, sir. And these plans become a part of it as well. 871 01:17:20,680 --> 01:17:30,320 And then when you were discussing some of the property value and not anticipate it impacting is that is there a source that was pulled from or? 872 01:17:31,080 --> 01:17:33,200 No, that's just a general observation. 873 01:17:34,400 --> 01:17:40,720 In being in front of you multiple times, we know that people are always concerned about their property value. 874 01:17:40,720 --> 01:17:48,900 We also see what happens after something is built and look back into that and generally, I mean, it's a general statement. 875 01:17:48,900 --> 01:17:56,120 and it's not a hard fact that I can give you data on. 876 01:17:56,640 --> 01:17:58,640 Okay, thank you. I just wanted to clarify that. 877 01:17:59,860 --> 01:18:06,900 We had some recent updates to the fueling station in the UDO. 878 01:18:07,360 --> 01:18:09,800 Obviously this is a PUD and that doesn't apply. 879 01:18:10,480 --> 01:18:13,380 But if this was just a fueling station coming in, 880 01:18:14,380 --> 01:18:17,780 how would that fit in with the updates to the UDO? 881 01:18:17,780 --> 01:18:20,740 So if it were just the fueling station, it would not be allowed. 882 01:18:21,320 --> 01:18:29,100 But we put a caveat in the ordinance that if it were part of an anchor and like the 883 01:18:29,100 --> 01:18:31,700 mire, like Kroger, that it is allowed. 884 01:18:32,000 --> 01:18:32,220 Okay. 885 01:18:32,400 --> 01:18:36,340 And I guess to clarify, is it not allowed or is it a special exception, is it? 886 01:18:36,340 --> 01:18:41,900 It's a special exception, but there's also spacing and all of those things come into it to make 887 01:18:41,900 --> 01:18:47,040 it really difficult on Green Street and the other therapists that we included in that. 888 01:18:47,040 --> 01:18:50,880 And the spacing would that be due to proximate to residential, 889 01:18:51,380 --> 01:18:54,460 proximate to other fueling stations or both? 890 01:18:54,520 --> 01:19:04,640 Right, there's a spacing from residential, from an existing fueling station that are in the UDO for a normal zoning. 891 01:19:05,160 --> 01:19:08,160 Okay, would this location violate? 892 01:19:10,520 --> 01:19:15,440 It would probably with the residential to the north of the apartments. 893 01:19:16,000 --> 01:19:17,800 Okay, all right, thank you. 894 01:19:17,800 --> 01:19:18,420 I 895 01:19:25,590 --> 01:19:27,550 think those are all my questions for staff, thank you. 896 01:19:28,070 --> 01:19:30,310 All right, is the applicant present? 897 01:19:32,940 --> 01:19:35,820 Please step up and state your name and address for the record, please. 898 01:19:42,680 --> 01:19:45,960 My name is Macy Downey with McBridedale-Clarian. 899 01:19:46,280 --> 01:19:52,280 Addresses 5721, Dragonway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45227. 900 01:19:56,320 --> 01:20:04,940 I think I will try not to be repetitive, because Elizabeth did a great job of going over a lot of the details, but 901 01:20:04,940 --> 01:20:08,300 but we did prepare a short presentation. 902 01:20:12,270 --> 01:20:14,770 Yes, sorry, maybe I'll move this a little closer. 903 01:20:15,770 --> 01:20:16,190 Oh, maybe not. 904 01:20:20,640 --> 01:20:21,360 Perfect, thank you. 905 01:20:25,950 --> 01:20:28,150 So yes, as Elizabeth mentioned, 906 01:20:28,330 --> 01:20:29,650 we're requesting a map amendment 907 01:20:30,250 --> 01:20:33,490 and a text amendment to hopefully clear 908 01:20:33,490 --> 01:20:36,050 of some confusion and provide development standards 909 01:20:36,050 --> 01:20:40,610 for commercial uses within the Heritage Hill PUD 910 01:20:41,470 --> 01:20:49,290 as a product of that, this kind of exemplifies what those changes are. 911 01:20:50,330 --> 01:20:57,270 Carger is proposing a $99,982 square foot store with a fuel center. 912 01:20:57,590 --> 01:21:05,910 The fuel center has seven dispensers and roughly 200 square foot attendant kiosk out on green street. 913 01:21:07,210 --> 01:21:13,630 As you mentioned, grocery pickaberry is to the north as well as the pharmacy drive-through. 914 01:21:14,530 --> 01:21:20,470 Krugger is proposing outdoor merchandising at their fuel center and seasonal sales in 915 01:21:20,470 --> 01:21:23,810 front of the Krugger store, like you typically would see. 916 01:21:26,220 --> 01:21:34,370 Two full access movement driveways are proposed along Northfield with the right-in right out closest 917 01:21:34,370 --> 01:21:40,090 is to the intersection and then one full movement access on South Green Street. 918 01:21:40,250 --> 01:21:43,870 I think there was a question about that distance from the intersection. 919 01:21:44,970 --> 01:21:49,010 We are required to have 300 feet of spacing and are providing 320. 920 01:21:52,260 --> 01:21:58,640 This proposal has about 380 parking spaces, two free standing signs, one along each right 921 01:21:58,640 --> 01:21:59,100 of way. 922 01:22:00,200 --> 01:22:05,520 Again, this is not a development plan application but we wanted to provide as much information 923 01:22:05,520 --> 01:22:11,380 up front as possible at this stage since this is a PUD and we know that this location is important 924 01:22:11,380 --> 01:22:14,180 to the town in the surrounding community. 925 01:22:17,380 --> 01:22:20,180 So taking a zoom out real quick, I know there was 926 01:22:20,180 --> 01:22:29,380 a couple of questions about kind of the layout here. The Kruger parcel, Kruger subject parcel is 927 01:22:29,380 --> 01:22:37,440 highlighted in like a bolder black line there. There is a parcel to the west that's owned by the HOS 928 01:22:37,440 --> 01:22:46,080 way that accommodates a lot of wetland area. And then you have the apartments to the north 929 01:22:46,880 --> 01:22:55,400 and then some auto commercial uses to the east and then single family to the west and 930 01:22:55,400 --> 01:23:02,880 south. Before we submitted our application we did meet with staff multiple times and met 931 01:23:02,880 --> 01:23:08,360 with the neighborhood in April to kind of bring forward a proposal that's in line with 932 01:23:08,360 --> 01:23:13,500 the goals of the town and hopefully minimize any impacts to the surrounding area, gathering 933 01:23:13,500 --> 01:23:14,120 some feedback. 934 01:23:17,890 --> 01:23:23,590 So here's just a quick exhibit that was put together because there are a couple factors. 935 01:23:23,590 --> 01:23:27,470 I think that come and to play here that aren't necessarily on the Kroger site. 936 01:23:28,490 --> 01:23:31,170 You have that HOA parcel to the west. 937 01:23:31,170 --> 01:23:36,210 Yes, there's also a gas line easement that's located to the south. 938 01:23:38,210 --> 01:23:43,090 That is the red area that's kind of dashed there. 939 01:23:43,650 --> 01:23:46,390 That's 50 feet about half of it on Kerber's property. 940 01:23:47,770 --> 01:23:51,110 There are a lot of limitations on what you can do in that area. 941 01:23:57,710 --> 01:24:04,590 So looking at the southern property line, code requires that we provide that 25 foot landscape 942 01:24:04,590 --> 01:24:06,890 upford with the required plantings. 943 01:24:07,910 --> 01:24:14,670 We are providing that, we're also providing that six foot tall privacy fence along the 944 01:24:14,670 --> 01:24:16,430 stores side there. 945 01:24:19,350 --> 01:24:24,230 And then as I mentioned, there's a gas line easement there, that's providing another 946 01:24:24,230 --> 01:24:29,710 18 to 21 feet of space that will be maintained with trees. 947 01:24:32,910 --> 01:24:37,610 Here's a quick look at the elevator, the sections again. 948 01:24:37,830 --> 01:24:39,970 I think we went over those already. 949 01:24:41,650 --> 01:24:48,830 The west side, the west buffer, we're providing the code required 25 foot landscape buffer. 950 01:24:50,450 --> 01:25:01,410 We are showing rather than the required proposed plantings, we are maintaining a strip of 951 01:25:02,590 --> 01:25:11,370 would it area that's approximately 80 to 90 feet in with, in lieu of that, we're providing 952 01:25:12,010 --> 01:25:18,150 the shrubs that are required. However, we are, we are writing into the ordinance that 953 01:25:18,150 --> 01:25:24,530 this be placed somewhere else on site just due to them not being visible back there and 954 01:25:24,530 --> 01:25:30,550 potentially some maintenance issues with the post fence and the grading back there. 955 01:25:30,550 --> 01:25:39,250 And then lastly, as I mentioned, there's that HOA property with the wetlands. 956 01:25:39,250 --> 01:25:44,930 That's about 94 to 135 feet and widths depending on where you're standing. 957 01:25:50,070 --> 01:25:52,690 Architecture was another big consideration. 958 01:25:53,590 --> 01:25:56,070 This design of the store and fuel center. 959 01:25:56,570 --> 01:26:02,510 We hope will complement existing architecture and adjacent neighborhood and across 960 01:26:02,510 --> 01:26:13,390 South Green Street, providing masonry and neutral warm material choices throughout the 961 01:26:13,390 --> 01:26:19,750 store and fuel center are designed to provide a more neighborhood grocery feel, which might 962 01:26:19,750 --> 01:26:25,690 contrast with some other large-scale groceries in the area that usually have like a more gray tone. 963 01:26:32,840 --> 01:26:38,740 Some other considerations that were made following, some conversations with staff in the 964 01:26:38,740 --> 01:26:46,700 neighborhood meeting, generally as the project progressed, we will be maintaining the existing 965 01:26:46,700 --> 01:26:51,460 railed fence that runs along the northern and eastern property lines along the right 966 01:26:51,460 --> 01:26:53,920 of way as much as possible. 967 01:26:55,080 --> 01:27:03,200 Obviously without interfering with the access proposed and visibility for those access points 968 01:27:03,200 --> 01:27:11,240 and for signage will also be maintaining the Heritage Hill neighborhood signage that's 969 01:27:11,240 --> 01:27:12,100 at that corner there. 970 01:27:13,500 --> 01:27:19,180 We are proposing signage for trucks to ensure that there will be no utilization of the neighborhood 971 01:27:19,180 --> 01:27:29,420 streets indicating that they're not supposed to pass a certain point at the North-Western 972 01:27:29,420 --> 01:27:35,960 corner of the property. And as discussed, we did complete a traffic study. 973 01:27:38,450 --> 01:27:39,110 So altogether, 974 01:27:40,290 --> 01:27:45,330 we believe it was the original intent that the Heritage Help UD provide some commercial 975 01:27:45,330 --> 01:27:51,710 uses within the overall development, this in addition to the future land use map, designation 976 01:27:51,710 --> 01:27:58,210 of commercial, we think reinforce the fact that the requested zone map amendment and the 977 01:27:58,210 --> 01:28:03,690 text amendment are aligned with the intent of the COP plan and the original PUD. 978 01:28:05,590 --> 01:28:11,090 Carger believes that the proposal provides the opportunity to execute plans that exceed 979 01:28:11,090 --> 01:28:22,630 the UDO landscaping requirements, incorporate quality materials, and offer a recommended land use while providing service to the surrounding community. 980 01:28:24,070 --> 01:28:29,350 We respectfully request the approval of the amendments and are happy to answer any questions. 981 01:28:29,370 --> 01:28:38,130 I also have some of our senators here tonight from Kroger, our civil team to help us if there's anything I can't answer. 982 01:28:38,130 --> 01:28:38,210 Okay. 983 01:28:40,210 --> 01:28:40,690 Okay. 984 01:28:41,050 --> 01:28:41,310 Thank you. 985 01:28:42,770 --> 01:28:43,910 Questions for the applicant. 986 01:28:44,810 --> 01:28:45,650 How many will go first? 987 01:28:48,080 --> 01:28:48,460 Sure. 988 01:28:49,840 --> 01:28:53,020 I keep turning it off, and then it's not on when I want to talk. 989 01:28:53,900 --> 01:28:58,040 First of all, what kind of hours are you looking at for the Kruger and for the fuel station? 990 01:28:59,180 --> 01:29:07,340 Typically they will run six to ten or six to eleven, and the store and the fuel kind of coincide 991 01:29:07,340 --> 01:29:08,200 with their hours. 992 01:29:08,260 --> 01:29:08,760 Same hours. 993 01:29:08,760 --> 01:29:09,960 Okay. 994 01:29:14,380 --> 01:29:15,380 Hold on. 995 01:29:17,720 --> 01:29:23,260 You said how close the structure was or the property line was to 996 01:29:23,260 --> 01:29:28,820 a the people's homes. How far away is it to their property line? 997 01:29:31,540 --> 01:29:37,980 Generally like either property line or both the building to the property line. 998 01:29:37,980 --> 01:29:43,880 I think that is show the building to the property line. Let me see. 999 01:29:50,560 --> 01:29:52,740 See if I have a plan that shows that. 1000 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:27,900 I did look a little bit that on the west property line from, I look from the wall, the privacy wall, to the property line for the residential properties. It was approximately 176 feet to 206 feet. That's not from the building, that's from the price. That's on the west side, right? We don't know on the south side though. I didn't have the property line. If I could do some quick move. 1001 01:30:27,900 --> 01:30:39,380 It's approximately 23 plus 30 plus 42, which would be 53, 44. 1002 01:30:41,260 --> 01:30:42,020 97. 1003 01:30:42,700 --> 01:30:43,140 Thank you. 1004 01:30:43,700 --> 01:30:45,840 This is free Ramsey with Crowder. 1005 01:30:47,640 --> 01:30:49,160 Free Ramsey with Crowder. 1006 01:30:49,340 --> 01:30:49,900 Do you need my address? 1007 01:30:50,540 --> 01:30:50,980 Yes, please. 1008 01:30:50,980 --> 01:30:56,980 Five, nine, six, zero, Kesselay, West Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana. 1009 01:30:57,720 --> 01:30:57,940 Thank you. 1010 01:31:04,320 --> 01:31:06,200 I think that's those are all my questions. 1011 01:31:06,680 --> 01:31:07,120 Thank you. 1012 01:31:07,960 --> 01:31:08,700 Mr. Claude? 1013 01:31:09,040 --> 01:31:09,240 Certainly. 1014 01:31:09,360 --> 01:31:10,300 I have three questions. 1015 01:31:10,860 --> 01:31:12,560 The first one is around the need for this. 1016 01:31:12,640 --> 01:31:15,660 When I read through the comments, there was a lot of concern that this property 1017 01:31:15,660 --> 01:31:19,340 will be underutilized and eventually become vacant and white. 1018 01:31:19,460 --> 01:31:24,720 So you talk about like what process you go through to determine the need for a building 1019 01:31:24,720 --> 01:31:27,300 of the size and the choice of this location. 1020 01:31:27,920 --> 01:31:33,720 Yeah, Croger does a lot of behind-the-scenes market research to select their sites. 1021 01:31:34,730 --> 01:31:42,720 They also take into account things like your comp plan to find sites that best suit their 1022 01:31:42,720 --> 01:31:43,140 use, 1023 01:31:45,320 --> 01:31:53,200 but ultimately, yeah, just the market research that Croger completes on their end provides 1024 01:31:53,200 --> 01:31:57,900 provides them with, you know, the gaps in services. 1025 01:31:59,500 --> 01:32:03,860 Okay, so there was a plan somewhere that exists that says that the town of Brownsburg, 1026 01:32:03,880 --> 01:32:06,680 or at least the surrounding community excited, this is very close to the AVE Online, 1027 01:32:07,060 --> 01:32:11,140 does have a need for an additional grocery store even though I know we just added a 1028 01:32:11,140 --> 01:32:11,880 mire here recently. 1029 01:32:12,540 --> 01:32:16,400 Yeah, I mean, when we make in this sort of investment, 1030 01:32:16,700 --> 01:32:19,440 if they didn't believe in the project for sure. 1031 01:32:19,960 --> 01:32:20,600 Okay, perfect. 1032 01:32:20,600 --> 01:32:25,880 My second question was, there were concerns about the six foot fence, and if I had two concerns 1033 01:32:25,880 --> 01:32:28,380 I read in the comments, one, and I share these concerns. 1034 01:32:28,940 --> 01:32:33,460 One is, you know, six feet, maybe not behind enough, to address things like light trespass 1035 01:32:33,460 --> 01:32:35,660 from primarily headlights. 1036 01:32:35,880 --> 01:32:39,240 I know that the other downward lights are not going to be an issue. 1037 01:32:39,720 --> 01:32:44,280 And then also the aging of a vinyl fence versus a masonry fence. 1038 01:32:44,760 --> 01:32:49,000 Is that something that Craig would be open to, a taller and potentially a different structure 1039 01:32:49,000 --> 01:32:54,900 or such as a masonry fence to sort of address light and sound trespass? 1040 01:32:55,870 --> 01:33:04,300 We believe that the fence proposed in addition to all the landscaping proposed will be sufficient. 1041 01:33:04,860 --> 01:33:10,780 I think the landscaping itself is kind of designed to block the headlights. 1042 01:33:10,780 --> 01:33:18,840 It's curfews used to do performing maintenance on the vinyl fences as necessary. 1043 01:33:19,240 --> 01:33:25,520 So it's something they're accustomed to, I think, right 1044 01:33:27,570 --> 01:33:29,350 now we don't foresee a need for a 1045 01:33:29,350 --> 01:33:36,450 Masonry fence or a Masonry wall, I guess, are you referring to the south or the west side? 1046 01:33:36,810 --> 01:33:37,510 Actually, both. 1047 01:33:37,670 --> 01:33:41,570 Because I think that's a both that were concerns about the obviously the semi-traffic coming into 1048 01:33:41,570 --> 01:33:45,410 the loading dock, shining into the back of people's windows, and then that would also 1049 01:33:45,410 --> 01:33:48,730 those trucks would come into the west and then head down and hit the south as well. 1050 01:33:49,170 --> 01:33:49,410 Yeah. 1051 01:33:49,830 --> 01:33:58,310 I don't think we have looked into the option of a taller fence, but I do believe that 1052 01:33:58,310 --> 01:34:04,190 a privacy fence could offer the same benefits as a masonry wall, in that regard. 1053 01:34:06,270 --> 01:34:06,710 Okay. 1054 01:34:07,310 --> 01:34:09,490 My third question relates to the size of the science. 1055 01:34:09,490 --> 01:34:10,830 So we're questioning the variance here. 1056 01:34:11,530 --> 01:34:13,590 So I assume this sign, and maybe apologize, 1057 01:34:13,750 --> 01:34:15,310 this might have been a better question for staff. 1058 01:34:16,170 --> 01:34:19,730 Is this larger than the sign on the existing croger 1059 01:34:20,250 --> 01:34:24,050 that's located north on Green Street close to the interstate? 1060 01:34:24,330 --> 01:34:27,370 And you're referring to the front croger wall sign? 1061 01:34:27,570 --> 01:34:28,190 Yes, yes. 1062 01:34:28,630 --> 01:34:32,510 It shouldn't be, I'm not super familiar with how big that sign is, 1063 01:34:32,530 --> 01:34:36,350 but this is pretty typical for a croger marketplace. 1064 01:34:36,350 --> 01:34:44,410 place, and we feel that it is proportional for the size of the facade and something that 1065 01:34:44,410 --> 01:34:50,350 is going to be readable from Green Street, which, you know, this sits kind of far back 1066 01:34:50,350 --> 01:34:50,810 from that. 1067 01:34:51,130 --> 01:34:51,150 So. 1068 01:34:52,830 --> 01:34:53,330 Okay. 1069 01:34:54,610 --> 01:34:56,470 Can I piggyback on something he said? 1070 01:34:57,710 --> 01:35:02,090 Looking at this picture that's up right now, see where the fence is? 1071 01:35:03,230 --> 01:35:04,190 The vinyl fence? 1072 01:35:04,750 --> 01:35:05,110 Correct. 1073 01:35:05,110 --> 01:35:10,230 You see how it's downhill yeah, and I think so it's only got about two feet of coverage 1074 01:35:10,910 --> 01:35:17,210 From any light going straight across the property, right, and I think staff made the comment 1075 01:35:17,210 --> 01:35:22,130 In future development plans if this were to move forward that we would 1076 01:35:22,950 --> 01:35:24,710 relocate that privacy fence 1077 01:35:25,230 --> 01:35:31,890 Up on top of the hill per say to meet up with the pavement line, right. Okay. Thank you 1078 01:35:33,680 --> 01:35:34,900 No further questions. 1079 01:35:35,220 --> 01:35:36,240 Thank you, Mr. Humphrey. 1080 01:35:36,660 --> 01:35:37,280 Yep. 1081 01:35:37,840 --> 01:35:43,360 Macy you said that you met with the community and took their information and feedback. 1082 01:35:43,360 --> 01:35:45,540 What changes were made as a result of you? 1083 01:35:45,860 --> 01:35:52,140 We did extend the fence on the southern side of the property. 1084 01:35:53,200 --> 01:36:00,640 We included those truck signs to not pass the cargo property. 1085 01:36:03,810 --> 01:36:09,190 We completed further traffic study and 1086 01:36:11,430 --> 01:36:14,130 we 1087 01:36:16,560 --> 01:36:24,320 extended the extent of our maintenance of the 1088 01:36:24,320 --> 01:36:25,140 railed fence. 1089 01:36:25,920 --> 01:36:31,100 Initially, we had it at the corner as like a gateway feature with the neighborhood 1090 01:36:31,640 --> 01:36:43,400 but we have extended it to maintain it the full length of the property with the exception of the access drives and those visibility areas. 1091 01:36:43,660 --> 01:36:48,740 Two fence adjustments, or what came out of that meeting, those are the changes. 1092 01:36:48,920 --> 01:36:50,620 Those are the changes that were made, the two fence. 1093 01:36:50,620 --> 01:36:50,940 Yes. 1094 01:36:51,280 --> 01:36:51,380 Okay. 1095 01:36:52,280 --> 01:36:52,500 All right. 1096 01:36:52,780 --> 01:36:59,460 Next question is the zoning, the local First Corridor Regional, when, when corroborates 1097 01:36:59,460 --> 01:37:03,100 their, their marketing, their advertising, would that just be for Brownsburg, would they 1098 01:37:03,100 --> 01:37:07,140 market for outside of the community? 1099 01:37:08,370 --> 01:37:16,960 We are very close to the community's edge, I think, Avon is a couple feet down the road. 1100 01:37:16,960 --> 01:37:21,600 So I would imagine, and I can't speak on behalf of marketing. 1101 01:37:21,880 --> 01:37:30,280 But I would imagine that some folks from Avon would be included in any marketing efforts as well. 1102 01:37:30,620 --> 01:37:35,440 Okay, would you be looking to bring in folks from farther away than that? 1103 01:37:35,760 --> 01:37:40,240 Is your marketing intended, or are you intending to get customers from further away? 1104 01:37:40,240 --> 01:37:43,200 I don't know that that would be necessary. 1105 01:37:45,300 --> 01:37:51,100 I would assume they would visit their local Krugger stores rather than travel out of the way to visit this one. 1106 01:37:51,680 --> 01:37:51,780 Okay. 1107 01:37:54,040 --> 01:38:01,680 Noise wise, so I noticed a lot of the truck access dump trash, all that is in the back corner. 1108 01:38:01,940 --> 01:38:02,340 Why is that? 1109 01:38:02,700 --> 01:38:05,000 Why would you put it in the back corner of the building? 1110 01:38:05,000 --> 01:38:15,640 But that was the best kind of layout for the site, otherwise if you turned it, the loading 1111 01:38:15,640 --> 01:38:20,440 docs would still be facing residential and then you'd kind of have a split parking lot. 1112 01:38:20,720 --> 01:38:23,760 So customers wouldn't have direct access to the storefront. 1113 01:38:24,580 --> 01:38:31,500 And then anywhere from there, you'd be putting your truck docs on right of way, which is not 1114 01:38:31,500 --> 01:38:35,320 the most sightly, nor do I know if it's allowed by code. 1115 01:38:36,500 --> 01:38:42,220 We do feel that the, you know, we were able to provide the most buffer in this area as 1116 01:38:42,220 --> 01:38:44,600 well, just given the shape of the property. 1117 01:38:46,760 --> 01:38:54,140 And yeah, the loading docs were put back there, I think intentionally, as well as the trash 1118 01:38:54,140 --> 01:39:00,500 compactor which is I think there were some questions about that. It's internally 1119 01:39:00,500 --> 01:39:09,320 fed from the store and then the compactor truck will come and pick it up and 1120 01:39:09,320 --> 01:39:13,560 take it away. There's no slamming of dumpsters associated with that. It's a 1121 01:39:13,560 --> 01:39:24,120 pretty seamless operation. Right, so it's not something you want in front of your 1122 01:39:24,120 --> 01:39:31,340 Noise-wise, you would have refrigerator trucks that would be left back there overnight, right, with refrigeration units. 1123 01:39:31,680 --> 01:39:39,320 It's my understanding that croggers, refrigeration trucks will come and drop their trailers and leave, 1124 01:39:39,680 --> 01:39:45,900 not necessarily stall out in the back of the store for extended periods of time. 1125 01:39:45,920 --> 01:39:49,880 It's common for the trailer to sit there with the conditioner running, though, correct? 1126 01:39:49,880 --> 01:40:05,040 I mean, they're offloaded as soon as they arrive, so I'm not sure the duration of that process, or how long they keep that refrigeration on, but how was the HVAC for the space conducted? Is it rooftop units? 1127 01:40:05,600 --> 01:40:09,620 Yes, it will be rooftop in screened with a pair of pitfalls. 1128 01:40:10,000 --> 01:40:11,380 Okay, and those are on 24-7. 1129 01:40:12,760 --> 01:40:13,880 Yes, I believe so. 1130 01:40:13,880 --> 01:40:19,320 Okay. Got it. Okay. That's a question to have. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Dolan. 1131 01:40:20,640 --> 01:40:26,780 Um, this question maybe should be for staff. Do you know where the, if the green street 1132 01:40:26,780 --> 01:40:29,360 entrance where that lines up across from Christian brothers? 1133 01:40:35,580 --> 01:40:37,320 Um, I don't know if that's shown 1134 01:40:37,320 --> 01:40:43,000 on. Currently it's pretty close, but they're wanting to close that entrance and move it, so 1135 01:40:43,000 --> 01:40:48,040 they're moving that one. They're going to move it closer and they are not going to have full 1136 01:40:48,040 --> 01:40:52,460 access. It's limited in. Okay. Okay. 1137 01:40:55,940 --> 01:41:01,800 Anything else? Yeah, it's perhaps. I have a two for 1138 01:41:01,800 --> 01:41:07,660 now. According to the gas pipeline that we spoke of, I looked it up on the National 1139 01:41:07,660 --> 01:41:16,540 Pipeline Mapping System. Does Krugger have concerns that this is considered a hazardous 1140 01:41:16,540 --> 01:41:17,060 just liquid. 1141 01:41:19,680 --> 01:41:27,140 No concerns. We'll obviously take the appropriate measures with the development 1142 01:41:27,140 --> 01:41:32,740 and we're aware that there's very restricted activities that can happen in that area, 1143 01:41:33,380 --> 01:41:38,060 but no, no concerns. Okay, so no concerns on the hazardous liquid 1144 01:41:38,060 --> 01:41:44,740 pipelines. What about the retired landfills that are to the west and north, northwest? 1145 01:41:44,740 --> 01:41:48,400 Yeah, there's no concerns there. 1146 01:41:49,570 --> 01:42:02,100 I believe that we are outside the IDAM notification area, however, that works out, but yeah, we're aware of the concerns. 1147 01:42:03,200 --> 01:42:05,000 Those are my questions for now. 1148 01:42:05,740 --> 01:42:15,880 Okay. Thank you. A couple questions. The the six foot wall on the west property line in the retaining wall. 1149 01:42:17,540 --> 01:42:32,080 Are those I don't know if we saw a cut are those on top of each other or they in front and if so, how tall is the retaining wall compared to the six foot. 1150 01:42:32,080 --> 01:42:40,420 fire is looking for the site plan which is first um see yeah there's two walls shown one along the 1151 01:42:40,420 --> 01:42:47,920 rear pavement edge and then there is also a section um closer to the side of the store kind 1152 01:42:47,920 --> 01:42:57,540 of near the entrance there um I don't know that we have established an exact height for that retaining 1153 01:43:07,970 --> 01:43:11,970 I mean, I don't know what it ranges from, but if we're getting a five foot retaining 1154 01:43:11,970 --> 01:43:15,450 wall and you're putting a six foot fence in front of it, that doesn't make sense. 1155 01:43:15,570 --> 01:43:17,850 So I just want to kind of clarify how that looks. 1156 01:43:18,250 --> 01:43:24,110 Yeah, and I think the intent is for the fence to be on top of the wall. 1157 01:43:24,270 --> 01:43:24,470 Okay. 1158 01:43:24,730 --> 01:43:26,430 That's what my question is. 1159 01:43:26,430 --> 01:43:31,290 Okay. Do you want the high? I can provide the height. 1160 01:43:31,630 --> 01:43:34,810 Yes, please, if you have it. Could you state your name and address for the record? 1161 01:43:35,070 --> 01:43:41,270 Patrick Sawinsky, address 500 East 96th Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46240. 1162 01:43:41,910 --> 01:43:42,150 Thank you. 1163 01:43:42,410 --> 01:43:46,610 The wall would range from zero up to the maximum 12 feet based on preliminary design. 1164 01:43:47,130 --> 01:43:49,530 Okay, and that is the retaining wall by itself. 1165 01:43:49,990 --> 01:43:50,570 That is correct. 1166 01:43:50,790 --> 01:43:51,250 All right. Thank you. 1167 01:43:55,100 --> 01:43:57,900 And then may have needed him to stay up here. 1168 01:43:57,900 --> 01:44:02,120 What is the plan for drainage detention retention? 1169 01:44:03,040 --> 01:44:05,840 I think I can, yeah, if you want to come up here. 1170 01:44:06,420 --> 01:44:11,080 I do know we are planning for on-site detention, but... 1171 01:44:11,080 --> 01:44:16,680 Yes, so all stormwater management measures will be designed in accordance with Tana Brown's 1172 01:44:16,680 --> 01:44:18,080 Verrigan-Hendrick's County standards. 1173 01:44:18,580 --> 01:44:23,440 As part of their requirements, we anticipate that an underground detention system will be provided 1174 01:44:23,440 --> 01:44:27,800 it on site to limit discharge rates from the proposed development. 1175 01:44:28,820 --> 01:44:32,880 Okay, and just to clarify, that would capture all impervious surfaces from this. 1176 01:44:33,240 --> 01:44:42,640 Yeah, obviously there is some small amount outside the impervious area that may continue to drain onto the other properties. 1177 01:44:43,420 --> 01:44:46,300 Yes, the full impervious development would be captured by the system. 1178 01:44:46,720 --> 01:44:47,280 All right, thank you. 1179 01:44:48,800 --> 01:44:51,060 All right, I think that's all I have for the civil. 1180 01:44:51,280 --> 01:44:51,520 Thank you. 1181 01:44:51,520 --> 01:44:58,600 I will also note that we have started conversations with the drainage folks, the drainage board as well. 1182 01:44:58,980 --> 01:44:59,160 Okay. 1183 01:45:00,000 --> 01:45:27,940 And then, I think just last question, this facility is 99,000 square feet. You know, I, Kroger has multiple stores, multiple brands. Are there other smaller facilities that Kroger has been developing lately? Or is this a standard? What, what kind of range and models have been developed in an area similar to this? This is typical for what Kroger is providing now. 1184 01:45:27,940 --> 01:45:39,160 They were developing 123 square feet for a short time there, but this is obviously smaller 1185 01:45:39,160 --> 01:45:40,200 than that. 1186 01:45:40,320 --> 01:45:49,320 The area provided kind of provides all the amenities that people expect with crocker nowadays, 1187 01:45:49,760 --> 01:45:55,140 the pick up, the pharmacy, usually they have a coffee tenant inside. 1188 01:45:55,960 --> 01:46:03,000 the offering within the store, so the 99 is pretty standard for CROGR. 1189 01:46:04,020 --> 01:46:08,460 All right, thank you. Any last questions for the applicant? 1190 01:46:10,940 --> 01:46:11,460 All right, thank you. 1191 01:46:11,620 --> 01:46:11,860 Thank you. 1192 01:46:15,130 --> 01:46:22,490 All right, staff and we received numerous written comments for this and we had those in our packet. 1193 01:46:23,150 --> 01:46:28,390 Let's say do we have a quick summary of some of the topics that were presented. 1194 01:46:34,010 --> 01:46:41,610 All of the comments were submitted for your review and laser fish along with a synopsis of each one of those. 1195 01:46:42,310 --> 01:46:47,890 There was one more received today which I placed a hard copy in front of your places. 1196 01:46:48,870 --> 01:46:54,570 All in all we had 38 citizens send 58 written comments in opposition. 1197 01:46:54,570 --> 01:47:01,750 There were two petitions submitted, one with 56 signers and one with 354 signers. 1198 01:47:02,350 --> 01:47:09,070 The concerns ranged from traffic, safety, lighting, pollution, crime, infrastructure process, 1199 01:47:09,610 --> 01:47:13,150 wildlife compatibility, and need for this facility. 1200 01:47:13,510 --> 01:47:17,710 There were also five letters from citizens in support. 1201 01:47:18,690 --> 01:47:23,250 For another store on the south side, the convenience, the tax base, and 1202 01:47:23,250 --> 01:47:24,470 in the investment in Brownsburg. 1203 01:47:27,600 --> 01:47:28,380 All right, thank you. 1204 01:47:31,500 --> 01:47:36,220 And then prior to getting to the public comment, 1205 01:47:36,300 --> 01:47:38,680 I'm going to propose that we take a five minute recess. 1206 01:47:40,880 --> 01:47:43,180 That would be fine, just a reminder of commissioners 1207 01:47:43,180 --> 01:47:45,720 that please not discuss any matters pertaining 1208 01:47:45,720 --> 01:47:47,240 to the agenda this evening during the recess. 1209 01:47:51,690 --> 01:47:52,510 All right, thank you, everyone. 1210 01:47:53,930 --> 01:47:57,810 Now continue with the public comment. 1211 01:48:00,780 --> 01:48:04,180 So we'll start with statements against. 1212 01:48:04,180 --> 01:48:10,500 will have 20 minutes allocated, individuals will be permitted 3 minutes, and those representing 1213 01:48:10,500 --> 01:48:12,680 3 or more people will be permitted 5 minutes. 1214 01:48:15,590 --> 01:48:18,170 We would ask that you keep your statements 1215 01:48:18,170 --> 01:48:27,590 to the 5 criteria we have to consider for rezoning. If staff could put those criteria on the screens 1216 01:48:27,590 --> 01:48:27,850 please. 1217 01:48:31,520 --> 01:48:36,120 And just want to ask that due to the number of people here would like to comment 1218 01:48:36,120 --> 01:48:42,460 if you could avoid repetition for items that have already been presented, that would allow us to get to more people. 1219 01:48:43,400 --> 01:48:48,980 All right, Steph, do we have anyone signed up for a statement against? 1220 01:49:02,340 --> 01:49:05,280 Yes, Reverend Jim said. 1221 01:49:06,520 --> 01:49:09,160 Just to please state your name and address for the record, please. 1222 01:49:10,560 --> 01:49:14,020 The Reverend Jim said 6742 Fox Club Lane. 1223 01:49:14,980 --> 01:49:20,300 I respectfully ask the advisory plan commission in town attorney to clarify whether the proposed 1224 01:49:20,300 --> 01:49:26,300 program PUD amendment has satisfied the procedural requirements of the Brownsburg Unified 1225 01:49:26,300 --> 01:49:33,960 Development Ordinance. It requires property owners signatures, UDO section 8.3.b.1 appears 1226 01:49:33,960 --> 01:49:38,560 to require signatures from at least 50% of the property owners affected by the proposed PUD 1227 01:49:38,560 --> 01:49:43,020 the UDO amendment has the required 50% support been obtained and documented. 1228 01:49:43,420 --> 01:49:46,640 And if so, where is that documentation in the public hearing materials? 1229 01:49:47,080 --> 01:49:50,300 If not, on what basis can the petition proceed? 1230 01:49:50,300 --> 01:49:55,740 If the town believes this requirement does not apply, what UDO provision provides that exemption? 1231 01:49:56,380 --> 01:50:03,120 The authority to file the amendment was not in the public file as we were, as we heard today, but 1232 01:50:03,120 --> 01:50:10,320 But the UDO section 8.3.b, it says proposals to amend the PUD ordinance text must be filed 1233 01:50:10,320 --> 01:50:13,120 by the owners of the property to which the amendment applies. 1234 01:50:15,020 --> 01:50:20,300 We were able to look up the meeting minutes from the Camargo Club meeting when they were 1235 01:50:20,300 --> 01:50:26,520 creating the pub, and it originally, the original intent was for a small scale grocery store, 1236 01:50:26,520 --> 01:50:35,620 not a super market as is being proposed, so the legal sufficiency of the petition is in question. 1237 01:50:36,700 --> 01:50:44,200 Neighborhood Liaison's contact to the town attorney on July 24th, 2026, and followed up on August 5th, 2026, 1238 01:50:44,800 --> 01:50:52,720 seeking clarification of these requirements, and until today we got nothing until we heard the presentation today. 1239 01:50:52,720 --> 01:50:57,860 Given these questions were unanswered at the time regarding ownership, authority, 1240 01:50:57,980 --> 01:51:03,120 to file, and the required property owner support, we respectfully request that the APC not 1241 01:51:03,120 --> 01:51:07,060 proceed to the merits of the proposed development until the town attorney confirms 1242 01:51:07,060 --> 01:51:11,360 on the record that the petition is legally and procedurally sufficient. 1243 01:51:11,840 --> 01:51:13,840 The central question is very straightforward. 1244 01:51:14,720 --> 01:51:19,360 How can the APC properly consider and act upon this HUD amendment if compliance 1245 01:51:19,360 --> 01:51:26,240 With the UDO requirements governing who may file the amendment and the required property owner support has not been demonstrated. 1246 01:51:26,980 --> 01:51:34,040 We're asking that the town to follow its adopted procedures and establish publicly that the petition is legally eligible for consideration. 1247 01:51:34,760 --> 01:51:46,720 Before proceeding, we respectfully request that the APC and town attorney address these questions on the record and identify the specific UDO provisions supporting the town's decision to accept and hear this petition. 1248 01:51:46,720 --> 01:51:50,840 And is this proposal even legal to be considered tonight? 1249 01:51:51,500 --> 01:51:52,280 Thank you. 1250 01:51:53,200 --> 01:51:54,120 Thank you. 1251 01:51:58,980 --> 01:52:02,900 As I will address questions at the end of the applicant or 1252 01:52:02,900 --> 01:52:09,340 the staff can answer the questions that are presented after the public comment session. 1253 01:52:17,600 --> 01:52:20,880 I'm not sure how the APC wants to handle this. 1254 01:52:21,060 --> 01:52:25,200 My plan was to read through the list of folks to. 1255 01:52:25,200 --> 01:52:27,720 Correct, we'll go with the next person signed up. 1256 01:52:27,820 --> 01:52:28,760 Thank you. 1257 01:52:29,560 --> 01:52:31,860 It is Ms. Stephanie Manor. 1258 01:52:32,380 --> 01:52:33,060 All right, thank you. 1259 01:52:33,340 --> 01:52:34,320 I have an item for the projector. 1260 01:52:34,320 --> 01:52:34,880 I've submitted. 1261 01:52:36,300 --> 01:52:37,980 Would anybody like a paper copy? 1262 01:52:38,940 --> 01:52:39,860 For ease of looking. 1263 01:52:40,920 --> 01:52:41,120 Okay. 1264 01:52:41,360 --> 01:52:41,820 Yeah, I'm sure. 1265 01:52:42,680 --> 01:52:43,600 Yeah, sure, sure. 1266 01:52:46,460 --> 01:52:46,600 Yeah. 1267 01:52:50,030 --> 01:52:50,970 Thank you very much. 1268 01:52:58,190 --> 01:53:00,730 Stephanie Manor, I live in our custom bill, 1269 01:53:01,010 --> 01:53:04,610 home 43 feet south of the proposed change in land use. 1270 01:53:04,610 --> 01:53:06,710 at 6830 Brigham Bay Drive. 1271 01:53:07,350 --> 01:53:11,930 Most importantly, I am mom to our eight, five, and three-year-old, 1272 01:53:12,030 --> 01:53:14,410 who have always been told they grow up in our home. 1273 01:53:14,770 --> 01:53:19,350 That is proposed now to be unsafe and unfit for them. 1274 01:53:20,450 --> 01:53:22,450 Please look at the images projected on the screen, 1275 01:53:22,950 --> 01:53:24,630 and take note of the vast difference 1276 01:53:24,630 --> 01:53:26,150 from what Kroger has submitted. 1277 01:53:26,630 --> 01:53:29,050 This is the true plan, not just a building. 1278 01:53:29,450 --> 01:53:32,490 See, the proposal isn't about a building or a strip of brick. 1279 01:53:32,490 --> 01:53:39,670 Even Deb Cook and Council members were taken aback at what they saw touching our home when they looked at this. 1280 01:53:40,190 --> 01:53:45,710 We reviewed the lots allowed uses upon buying our land and trusted that as a place to build our lives. 1281 01:53:46,430 --> 01:53:56,890 Per experts this will devalue our experience and our home value greatly but we may not even have a choice but to abandon our forever home because it may no longer be safe. 1282 01:53:56,890 --> 01:54:04,390 You see, in the plan, Kroger is directing semis to exit the doc facing our home, 43 feet 1283 01:54:04,390 --> 01:54:07,010 from where my children play animal rescuer in the backyard. 1284 01:54:07,630 --> 01:54:13,230 But for your benefit, they move the line from the original drawing, instead of the distance 1285 01:54:13,230 --> 01:54:19,050 from my yard, now they show the distance from my house to the concrete where those semis 1286 01:54:19,050 --> 01:54:19,450 will drive. 1287 01:54:20,310 --> 01:54:25,290 So that doesn't change the design, but it does indicate we don't have the right to proper 1288 01:54:25,290 --> 01:54:28,910 for use and value of our lot, which is part of our home. 1289 01:54:30,130 --> 01:54:34,710 Kroger's own engineer said in the neighborhood meeting that their drainage system won't catch everything, 1290 01:54:35,350 --> 01:54:41,450 so truck chemicals, toxins, and other waste will drain from that elevated lot into yards. 1291 01:54:41,790 --> 01:54:42,870 But it's not just my kids. 1292 01:54:43,590 --> 01:54:47,550 My neighbor trusted this neighborhood as a safe space for his son Aiden, 1293 01:54:48,070 --> 01:54:51,450 who has severe disabilities and incredible sensitivities. 1294 01:54:51,450 --> 01:54:57,210 With constant sporadic loud noises, Aiden will probably not be able to play outdoors anymore. 1295 01:54:57,990 --> 01:55:00,990 He also will likely struggle just to be in his own home. 1296 01:55:02,010 --> 01:55:06,530 Why would we give privileges to a company who has fallen short on promises in the past 1297 01:55:06,530 --> 01:55:10,290 holding the Marsh Bacon for years so that a competitor couldn't move in? 1298 01:55:10,750 --> 01:55:17,350 The council spoke out on this then, and now, this same company is asking the town to reward 1299 01:55:17,350 --> 01:55:21,090 or that behavior at the expense of ruining family homes. 1300 01:55:21,850 --> 01:55:26,010 There is no doubt that this will ruin our peaceful enjoyment of our homes and 1301 01:55:26,010 --> 01:55:27,630 the feel of our neighborhoods. 1302 01:55:28,390 --> 01:55:32,670 This proposal not only places heavy commercial in our neighborhood, 1303 01:55:33,090 --> 01:55:38,790 but also in the spot that is the worst impactful, 1304 01:55:39,130 --> 01:55:43,070 the most negatively impactful on direct neighbors who live there now. 1305 01:55:43,750 --> 01:55:46,030 Please ask yourself, would you want this in your backyard? 1306 01:55:46,030 --> 01:55:50,470 loud noises, banging, lights, beepers, trash, mayhem. 1307 01:55:51,010 --> 01:55:53,410 If you say no, I wouldn't want this in my backyard. 1308 01:55:53,410 --> 01:55:54,490 Please vote no today. 1309 01:55:55,090 --> 01:55:57,370 I thank you for considering making a true difference 1310 01:55:57,370 --> 01:56:00,150 for all of us here tonight and those who can't be here. 1311 01:56:00,690 --> 01:56:01,910 Thank you, please vote no. 1312 01:56:02,530 --> 01:56:02,830 Thank you. 1313 01:56:12,930 --> 01:56:16,190 The next speaker is Chad Duda. 1314 01:56:17,310 --> 01:56:17,970 Good evening. 1315 01:56:18,310 --> 01:56:20,890 My name is Chad Duda, I live at 3329 Walnut Drive, 1316 01:56:21,210 --> 01:56:22,150 and I'm speaking in opposition. 1317 01:56:22,890 --> 01:56:25,190 My job is to set the framework because of this law, 1318 01:56:25,190 --> 01:56:31,190 This commission weighs this amendment against five principles and neighbors after me will speak to each in depth one the 1319 01:56:31,190 --> 01:56:37,470 Comprehensive plan the applicants own narrative admits the plan designates this parcel this parcel is local commercial 1320 01:56:37,470 --> 01:56:46,790 But the plan defines that category of small scale retail goods and services that do not notably exceed the surrounding residents and also minimize impact on neighbors a 1321 01:56:47,270 --> 01:56:53,790 99,000 square foot store supermarket with a seven dispenser fuel centers neither small scale nor low impact 1322 01:56:53,790 --> 01:56:58,970 In fact, its regional retail and the plan never put this on this corner. 1323 01:56:59,810 --> 01:57:02,350 2. The character conditions of the area. 1324 01:57:03,050 --> 01:57:08,270 By the applicant's own narrative, the trash compactor, the loading berth sit on the western residential side. 1325 01:57:09,330 --> 01:57:14,990 While the canopy runs, roughly 45 candles and runoff drains towards whitelit creek for pollution. 1326 01:57:15,670 --> 01:57:20,730 3. The most desirable use. The applicant's narrative calls this a transitional use of the land. 1327 01:57:20,730 --> 01:57:26,070 A regional store and full gas station is not transitional towards the neighborhood. 1328 01:57:26,550 --> 01:57:30,910 It intensifies the edge next to the nearby homes and threatens the normalcy of their neighborhoods. 1329 01:57:32,070 --> 01:57:38,670 For the conservation of property values, the applicant's narrative claims the project will not negatively impact the area. 1330 01:57:39,310 --> 01:57:42,670 Real estate professionals in your own pre-meeting comments say the opposite. 1331 01:57:43,190 --> 01:57:48,510 A home backing up to the supermarket, a fuel center, and delivery trucks sell for less and 1332 01:57:48,510 --> 01:57:50,010 to far fewer buyers. 1333 01:57:50,830 --> 01:57:53,210 Five, responsible development and growth. 1334 01:57:53,670 --> 01:57:56,730 This is a planning body, and this is where planning matters most. 1335 01:57:57,610 --> 01:58:01,090 The town's own stormwater reviewers deferred the drainage report flood routing, 1336 01:58:01,290 --> 01:58:05,150 detention design, and SWPPP to future development plan. 1337 01:58:05,810 --> 01:58:08,990 So you're asked to rewrite the PUD grant 10 waivers tonight 1338 01:58:09,470 --> 01:58:12,370 before anyone has proven the site can handle its own runoff and flooding. 1339 01:58:13,130 --> 01:58:16,210 Approving the promise and engineering it later is exactly backwards 1340 01:58:16,210 --> 01:58:17,230 in not how planning works. 1341 01:58:17,850 --> 01:58:24,150 five principles on everyone that's proposed a false short of the standard you're asked to uphold I'm not opposed to growth 1342 01:58:24,150 --> 01:58:31,310 I'm asking you to hold the project to plant to the planet promises residential's relied on our respectfully ask you to 1343 01:58:31,310 --> 01:58:36,970 recommend no on this putt amendment. Thank you, please 1344 01:58:40,080 --> 01:58:41,640 hold a pause. Thank you. 1345 01:58:41,640 --> 01:58:49,140 Richie Crawford. Thank you. Yes, my name is Richie Crawford 6760 Brigham Bay Drive as you can tell I work 1346 01:58:49,140 --> 01:58:55,440 FAT&T, I am the Brownsburg Inspector for all, everything you guys do here, for anything 1347 01:58:55,440 --> 01:58:56,460 going to AT&T. 1348 01:58:56,640 --> 01:58:58,240 So, I've been on a lot of job sites. 1349 01:59:00,160 --> 01:59:05,620 All the work and infrastructures and roads and utilities that would be needed, who's 1350 01:59:05,620 --> 01:59:06,200 paying for that? 1351 01:59:06,960 --> 01:59:11,720 The draft studies that provided does not show future growth, but shows already struggling 1352 01:59:11,720 --> 01:59:12,940 roads with D grades. 1353 01:59:13,580 --> 01:59:19,500 Some people are forced on the fact that this may bring funds to the town that would cost. 1354 01:59:20,540 --> 01:59:23,880 Road improvements, stormwater, runoffs, electrical wires move. 1355 01:59:24,420 --> 01:59:28,020 There's two houses to the south that are on well waters. 1356 01:59:28,940 --> 01:59:31,000 How's that going to affect those people right there? 1357 01:59:32,080 --> 01:59:38,420 I didn't see any proposal for croggers offering any funds for infrastructure needs. 1358 01:59:38,620 --> 01:59:41,020 So we need to know what is going to cost the neighbors. 1359 01:59:41,020 --> 01:59:46,800 But I ask, will this finitely benefit the town or cost the town? 1360 01:59:47,040 --> 01:59:54,660 Plus, Brownsburg's are paying a six-figure installment for development on Main Street per town council meeting. 1361 01:59:55,520 --> 01:59:57,020 So that's their cost right there. 1362 01:59:57,540 --> 01:59:59,940 What incentives will be given with tax abatement? 1363 02:00:13,160 --> 02:00:29,980 So, that's basically what I have. I also noticed that since I'm on all the sites all the time, you do have a lot of stuff that has to change infrastructure-wise. You have a fire hygienic when you travel in south that has to move. You also have a storm drain to start. 1364 02:00:29,980 --> 02:00:34,600 are you sticking out? You have both of those entrances that are going to have to change. 1365 02:00:35,220 --> 02:00:40,820 So you can't have two lights close together for traffic for the Christian brothers and 1366 02:00:40,820 --> 02:00:41,880 the traffic coming out. 1367 02:00:42,760 --> 02:00:49,180 Semitraphics not going to be able to turn coming southbound because the median school buses 1368 02:00:49,180 --> 02:00:53,360 are a struggling just to make that turn. So there's no way no semi is going to ever make 1369 02:00:53,360 --> 02:00:59,960 that turn. And most of all, I have a box, a PFP box that's feeding eight hundred and 1370 02:01:00,680 --> 02:01:09,960 164 people fiber in the corner of that lot right there when you turn it's behind that brick wall that will have to be moved 1371 02:01:12,040 --> 02:01:16,700 Definitely I've already talked to Henry's power. You're gonna need a three-phase system in there right now 1372 02:01:16,700 --> 02:01:20,460 It's a one-phase. There's a lot of variables on this the 1373 02:01:20,460 --> 02:01:22,840 Cons outweigh all the pros 1374 02:01:23,600 --> 02:01:25,540 That's all I have. Thank you 1375 02:01:25,540 --> 02:01:27,020 Thank you 1376 02:01:27,020 --> 02:01:28,020 Hello, 1377 02:01:31,380 --> 02:01:33,020 my name is Autumn Soika. 1378 02:01:33,340 --> 02:01:35,800 I'm the managing broker of Heroes Property Group. 1379 02:01:36,180 --> 02:01:38,640 Our address is 410 West Oak Street, 1380 02:01:39,200 --> 02:01:42,640 Suite 3, Scienceville, Indiana, 46077. 1381 02:01:43,400 --> 02:01:46,260 I'm here tonight in support of the many property owners 1382 02:01:46,260 --> 02:01:48,880 in this room and the many more that have reached out to you. 1383 02:01:49,700 --> 02:01:52,660 I'm coming to you tonight as a real estate professional 1384 02:01:52,660 --> 02:01:54,660 who's represented both buyers and sellers 1385 02:01:55,120 --> 02:01:56,600 in the neighboring subdivision, 1386 02:01:56,600 --> 02:01:58,140 and I share in their concerns. 1387 02:01:58,140 --> 02:02:02,480 I can absolutely tell you this will impact property values. 1388 02:02:03,140 --> 02:02:11,960 It will impact their right to quiet enjoyment and it will impact their resaleability mostly for the people that are closest to this development. 1389 02:02:12,960 --> 02:02:20,500 Last month I tuned into the meeting and after the continuance I thought that I would just keep listening in to hear what was happening in this part of Hendricks County. 1390 02:02:20,720 --> 02:02:26,880 And I was really happily pleased just with the way you guys took the time to flesh out. 1391 02:02:26,880 --> 02:02:31,540 something as simple as definitions to make sure that you had clarity as you 1392 02:02:31,540 --> 02:02:35,880 approach development in your community. I'm on the wrong side of some bad 1393 02:02:35,880 --> 02:02:40,040 development where I live and that was very refreshing to see. And that is 1394 02:02:40,040 --> 02:02:45,200 exactly how this body should function. Our neighbors in place for the people, not 1395 02:02:45,200 --> 02:02:50,120 for not for private interest. The truth is no one will care as much about this 1396 02:02:50,120 --> 02:02:53,580 community as the people that live here and I want to remind you that these are 1397 02:02:54,280 --> 02:03:01,240 They share your kids' sports teams, and they are your neighbors that don't mind driving 2.6 miles to the other croaker down the street. 1398 02:03:02,220 --> 02:03:13,080 Should you come to the conclusion that the additional grocery store, just a few miles from all of the others, is a greater benefit than protecting these property owners. 1399 02:03:13,400 --> 02:03:15,680 I ask you to require a few things. 1400 02:03:16,320 --> 02:03:22,160 Hold them to their proposed buffers, but also include masonry, sound mitigation, not vinyl fencing, 1401 02:03:22,160 --> 02:03:24,280 and require a minimum eight-foot berm. 1402 02:03:25,380 --> 02:03:29,740 Assist the neighborhood with closing their residential streets to stop outside traffic 1403 02:03:29,740 --> 02:03:30,640 from kind of through. 1404 02:03:31,020 --> 02:03:35,040 Common sense will tell us that semis get lost and people don't know where to go. 1405 02:03:35,960 --> 02:03:39,680 Require limited delivery and operation hours from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. 1406 02:03:39,680 --> 02:03:41,780 to eliminate noise and additional hazards. 1407 02:03:42,540 --> 02:03:45,020 Require all downward facing non-glare lighting. 1408 02:03:45,320 --> 02:03:49,160 Don't allow any outside storage or running vehicles to stay in the lot. 1409 02:03:49,160 --> 02:04:17,260 require that the building be placed in a less injurious location on the lot or better yet something smaller, as was mentioned, do not allow them to place the loading document next to residential homes and certainly not under 50 feet from a tax paying citizen, require law enforcement and security to mitigate crime and lastly add a clause to this put amendment that the changes void of this proposal does not come to fruition. 1410 02:04:17,960 --> 02:04:20,380 This is not about being anti-development. 1411 02:04:20,600 --> 02:04:22,200 This is about smart development. 1412 02:04:22,800 --> 02:04:29,300 In this area, these property owners would love to see you as their board stand up and protect them. 1413 02:04:29,680 --> 02:04:30,900 They didn't move to Main Street. 1414 02:04:31,180 --> 02:04:32,540 They moved to call the SACS. 1415 02:04:35,330 --> 02:04:35,910 Thank you. 1416 02:04:41,640 --> 02:04:42,520 Brian Hickman. 1417 02:04:55,820 --> 02:04:57,980 And they're finding the fact that they're going to go to the 1418 02:05:01,180 --> 02:05:02,160 hospital with all of them in the group. 1419 02:05:02,980 --> 02:05:08,960 The people in the market, up to the side of the detached gas station, would not represent the hospital with all of them already in one statement. 1420 02:05:09,980 --> 02:05:17,720 The Commission staff are going on page 58, and they report that the accidental points have been located without direct access to that incident. 1421 02:05:18,440 --> 02:05:19,220 That's not true. 1422 02:05:20,180 --> 02:05:27,880 The intersection of 227 North Road is this access point to the home road rather than the NAMCO campus, the Marvel Club, and the Renegative Park Department. 1423 02:05:28,440 --> 02:05:31,300 And it's the secondary access point to the residents moving away. 1424 02:05:31,860 --> 02:05:39,420 If approved, residents in these neighborhoods would then have to continue with so much our effort to use the North Road Drive Access Point to make sure that they are there. 1425 02:05:39,420 --> 02:05:45,640 as well as current delivery vehicles, instacart drivers, and current customers all using that same 1426 02:05:45,640 --> 02:05:50,240 intersection. As a big incident that an order to avoid this thing is an intersection, 1427 02:05:50,440 --> 02:05:54,600 residents of these neighborhoods will then help the youth to grow to do in a way at their 1428 02:05:54,600 --> 02:05:59,700 plant house. The increased traffic in an already poorly rated intersection through a neighborhood 1429 02:05:59,700 --> 02:06:03,760 without pre-designed bridge streets has not been considered. 1430 02:06:04,700 --> 02:06:10,720 Children play in the neighborhood directly adjacent to the site and they write their bikes along the bike path and run along with a little data. 1431 02:06:11,440 --> 02:06:16,080 What about the two brown-gray school buses that are dedicated so much more to our neighborhoods? 1432 02:06:17,160 --> 02:06:21,200 What happens when the library drivers are so much more smart because they're in a rush? 1433 02:06:22,020 --> 02:06:30,740 The draft traffic setting simply does not account for the sheer increased volume traffic that will now run through the intersection with the 99,000-4,500 people. 1434 02:06:32,120 --> 02:06:36,600 as well as a new apartment in the title being built on the App 2.67. 1435 02:06:37,820 --> 02:06:42,220 The Brownford PD, out of conditional resources to ensure the safety of residents in our neighborhood 1436 02:06:42,220 --> 02:06:44,620 will increase traffic and never increase traffic. 1437 02:06:46,600 --> 02:06:48,740 And finally, what happened with the Walmart? 1438 02:06:49,000 --> 02:06:52,460 It was a very preferred site, a quarter mile north of 322.67. 1439 02:06:53,260 --> 02:06:57,220 The curb was decided to have a nearly 300,000 square feet of supermarket, 1440 02:06:57,220 --> 02:07:03,420 along the same 6 mile stretch of 267, there's no water profitable and they cut 1441 02:07:03,420 --> 02:07:08,980 they can close this new market. The tower would then be left with a vacant 99,000 square foot 1442 02:07:08,980 --> 02:07:14,800 of supermarket gas station with 380 parking spaces, 100 feet north of the local 1443 02:07:14,800 --> 02:07:21,660 frontward side. That vacant building, which at the put chain, just passed, it would only ever be a 1444 02:07:21,660 --> 02:07:26,380 supermarket gas station, but then be the first thing people see when they drive into the 1445 02:07:26,380 --> 02:07:31,720 How was that responsible development group? 1446 02:07:32,300 --> 02:07:35,300 There are four in household assigned to condition. 1447 02:07:36,180 --> 02:07:38,080 You submit to you to say it's not. 1448 02:07:38,580 --> 02:07:39,940 Thank you, as you vote no. 1449 02:07:41,520 --> 02:07:42,120 Thank you. 1450 02:07:45,980 --> 02:07:46,900 Steph Duda. 1451 02:07:47,400 --> 02:07:49,720 Can you make sure your mic's on as a little green light on? 1452 02:07:50,240 --> 02:07:50,360 Yeah. 1453 02:07:50,620 --> 02:07:50,800 OK. 1454 02:07:50,960 --> 02:07:51,200 Thank you. 1455 02:07:52,020 --> 02:07:52,320 Hi. 1456 02:07:58,830 --> 02:08:00,950 I'm from Fresno, a parent in an agency. 1457 02:08:01,390 --> 02:08:03,890 I serve a state of innovation for a neighbor. 1458 02:08:03,890 --> 02:08:08,450 As an educator, I believe the communities teach values through the places they make. 1459 02:08:08,890 --> 02:08:11,610 No one is asking this land to remain untouched. 1460 02:08:12,050 --> 02:08:14,430 There are better possibilities to buy by the current cut. 1461 02:08:14,870 --> 02:08:19,090 A community park, walking past, gathering space, a play area, 1462 02:08:19,270 --> 02:08:21,730 or an outdoor learning center to look at that in A-Bon. 1463 02:08:22,970 --> 02:08:24,510 That local public schools use. 1464 02:08:25,090 --> 02:08:28,870 I've witnessed outdoor learning spaces and help students understand and experience 1465 02:08:28,870 --> 02:08:32,890 watershed, wildlife, and environmental science in a way that's not being taught. 1466 02:08:33,390 --> 02:08:37,510 That kind of resource was that that browns were children and families for generation. 1467 02:08:38,130 --> 02:08:44,530 My family and I moved to Brownsburg because I felt like a neighborhood, a community in the home. 1468 02:08:45,570 --> 02:08:48,170 We have lived in a neighborhood when it used to feel this way. 1469 02:08:49,050 --> 02:08:52,890 And we sadly watched it, it comes up in more than a quarter or a track and business. 1470 02:08:53,770 --> 02:08:56,730 It no longer resembles the community which we chose to reside. 1471 02:08:58,070 --> 02:09:02,710 What is that community feeling with characters, green spaces, and places where families could feel at home? 1472 02:09:03,450 --> 02:09:05,750 That's making you move around through it. 1473 02:09:05,990 --> 02:09:09,810 If you want to move directly in touch with this property, make that same investment. 1474 02:09:10,450 --> 02:09:12,450 Has anyone visit the site for the new project? 1475 02:09:14,700 --> 02:09:16,100 Also, 50 June now. 1476 02:09:16,840 --> 02:09:19,580 This is not an abstract personal land on a map. 1477 02:09:19,800 --> 02:09:22,320 It is a part of the daily surroundings of real families. 1478 02:09:22,960 --> 02:09:25,700 The mission has her with this proposal we need today. 1479 02:09:25,700 --> 02:09:30,020 More than 350 residents signed our petition in only a few days. 1480 02:09:30,680 --> 02:09:33,020 That does not mean residents opposed all the road. 1481 02:09:33,320 --> 02:09:37,360 It simply means that they are asking the town to please them before making a permanent change. 1482 02:09:38,200 --> 02:09:40,700 I've listened carefully to the residents who spoke before me. 1483 02:09:41,040 --> 02:09:45,140 They've addressed the project's technical, environmental, safety, and planning concerns. 1484 02:09:45,860 --> 02:09:50,600 I do not wish for a few close points, so, in closing, I'm asking the commission to consider 1485 02:09:50,600 --> 02:09:55,060 what this decision made for people to make here and for the future of Brownsburg. 1486 02:09:55,800 --> 02:10:00,580 The question before he is not whether this property can be developed is whether this proposal 1487 02:10:00,580 --> 02:10:04,300 is amendment is the right choice for this location and this community. 1488 02:10:04,900 --> 02:10:08,600 They respectfully ask you to honor the residents who trust you Brownsburg 1489 02:10:08,600 --> 02:10:09,680 but they're far from investment. 1490 02:10:10,440 --> 02:10:13,700 They're home and to recommend against this cut amendment. 1491 02:10:14,180 --> 02:10:16,340 Thank you for your time and service for our community. 1492 02:10:17,440 --> 02:10:18,060 Thank you. 1493 02:10:20,600 --> 02:10:26,060 Mr. Prime Minister, Mr. Vice President, staff has informed me that the 20-minute time limit has been reached. 1494 02:10:27,640 --> 02:10:30,100 How many names remain on the list? 1495 02:10:43,420 --> 02:10:47,520 Nine people to speak against and three to speak for. 1496 02:10:50,240 --> 02:10:56,980 Just for confirmation, the statements in support have a additional 20 minutes. 1497 02:11:01,910 --> 02:11:04,690 So nine by three would be another 27 minutes. 1498 02:11:04,690 --> 02:11:11,150 And I think I like what we did last time where we asked if anyone had something different 1499 02:11:11,150 --> 02:11:15,070 than the items that have been discussed so far. 1500 02:11:15,850 --> 02:11:20,010 And if anyone had those, but understand, if you start going into the things we already 1501 02:11:20,010 --> 02:11:23,430 covered, we will need to stop because we want to give everybody a chance to just give make 1502 02:11:23,430 --> 02:11:27,190 their points if they are different from the ones that have been made previously, right? 1503 02:11:27,490 --> 02:11:31,650 So obviously you have any, does anyone else have the other nine that are signed up? 1504 02:11:31,650 --> 02:11:39,890 Well continue any other nine have different points that they are wanting to make than that have not already been made 1505 02:11:41,150 --> 02:11:44,130 So we're early asking for one additional speaker 1506 02:11:45,710 --> 02:11:51,670 Okay, so I would propose to suspend our rules for one additional speaker give them three minutes and just to confirm 1507 02:11:51,670 --> 02:11:52,610 in 1508 02:11:53,270 --> 02:11:59,690 Fairness to the rebuttal that the applicant would also receive additional time on top of their five minute rebuttal 1509 02:11:59,690 --> 02:12:07,740 Certainly, would that be one extra minute, would that be sufficient for the applicant, they give a thumbs up. 1510 02:12:07,800 --> 02:12:08,720 We have a thumbs up, yeah. 1511 02:12:09,440 --> 02:12:19,840 So there's a motion to permit three additional minutes for statements against, I think will allow three additional minutes for statements for. 1512 02:12:20,860 --> 02:12:27,680 And then one additional minute for the applicant rebuttal, is that your motion. 1513 02:12:28,280 --> 02:12:29,960 Okay, there's a motion, is there a second? 1514 02:12:29,960 --> 02:12:35,240 Second all those in favor please vote aye aye those opposed nay 1515 02:12:36,840 --> 02:12:38,480 Motion passes. All right. Thank you. 1516 02:12:57,460 --> 02:13:00,860 Okay. Thank you. Thank you for when please state your name for the record 1517 02:13:53,180 --> 02:13:59,740 already have it. When it rains, our coffee floods and we actually have a creep, because that is our property. 1518 02:14:00,400 --> 02:14:04,380 And the engineer has already said that that will not stop. 1519 02:14:05,580 --> 02:14:07,240 Can you speak into the mic please? 1520 02:14:09,240 --> 02:14:10,820 Could you speak into the mic please? 1521 02:14:11,180 --> 02:14:16,500 This is not the development, we are a problem. I was there for that original health pills, 1522 02:14:16,500 --> 02:14:26,780 and I guarantee you they did not say that there would be any commercial as a matter of fact they promise 1523 02:14:27,500 --> 02:14:34,440 to a house way bigger than this in plain field that there would be no commercial on that area. 1524 02:14:34,900 --> 02:14:41,480 None periods the last part would be a residential facility for seniors. 1525 02:14:41,480 --> 02:14:50,400 Many people that fight property and have a built in five on the promise that it would be 1526 02:14:50,400 --> 02:14:55,860 no commercial and the last step of the property would be the senior system property. 1527 02:14:56,360 --> 02:14:59,700 My husband likes to kid everybody and say it's complete. 1528 02:15:00,400 --> 02:15:07,600 Because it would be right next to our property, we could look over, we're old. And I had had an eight 1529 02:15:07,600 --> 02:15:14,240 foot, we've been at 25 years, I started with an eight foot gross garden, I now have a hundred 1530 02:15:14,240 --> 02:15:21,400 and fifty gross garden. We started with a house that was one store, it is now two stores. 1531 02:15:22,500 --> 02:15:29,040 We would not put all that money into our property if we knew there was going to be commercial 1532 02:15:29,040 --> 02:15:34,940 at school. And the last thing I would like to say, if you put a gas station, that's to my 1533 02:15:34,940 --> 02:15:42,640 bedroom window, I have a chronic cough. I am old, I'm over the 60 range, and I am a 1534 02:15:42,640 --> 02:15:46,000 high risk. Please don't know. 1535 02:15:46,880 --> 02:15:48,620 That's right. Thank you. 1536 02:15:56,190 --> 02:15:59,030 Scott Smith. And this is the statements for support. 1537 02:15:59,310 --> 02:16:00,970 These are support statements. Thank you. 1538 02:16:00,970 --> 02:16:01,650 I 1539 02:16:10,100 --> 02:16:12,060 bring in Bay's Drive and the Heritage Hills of the Bay. 1540 02:16:12,420 --> 02:16:14,680 Many of my neighbors here are, many of my neighbors 1541 02:16:14,680 --> 02:16:16,660 and here tonight speak against the broker development. 1542 02:16:17,300 --> 02:16:19,260 Although it goes against my own personal interest 1543 02:16:19,260 --> 02:16:21,220 as a homeowner, I'm not here to do that. 1544 02:16:21,580 --> 02:16:23,400 I think you should allow the broker to proceed. 1545 02:16:23,860 --> 02:16:25,680 I do worry about the traffic and the listen 1546 02:16:25,680 --> 02:16:27,740 with potential for my own property values 1547 02:16:27,740 --> 02:16:28,280 to be diminished. 1548 02:16:28,880 --> 02:16:30,580 But they also worry about the devastating effects 1549 02:16:30,580 --> 02:16:32,480 of sign bill ones, the terrible amount 1550 02:16:32,480 --> 02:16:35,040 of the residential and commercial property in Brunsburg 1551 02:16:35,480 --> 02:16:37,700 and the brutal impact of 30 years of tips 1552 02:16:37,700 --> 02:16:39,280 if citing money and legal schools. 1553 02:16:39,840 --> 02:16:42,340 This development would be a commercial taxpayer 1554 02:16:42,340 --> 02:16:44,400 outside of the Brownsburg tip. 1555 02:16:44,820 --> 02:16:47,140 There's far too little of that kind of land remaining, 1556 02:16:47,540 --> 02:16:49,760 and we cannot miss commercial development opportunities 1557 02:16:49,760 --> 02:16:50,540 like this one. 1558 02:16:51,080 --> 02:16:53,880 I can't personally go on chatter to smile about you 1559 02:16:53,880 --> 02:16:55,860 when the Brownsburg Town Council regarding tip 1560 02:16:55,860 --> 02:16:57,380 and residential commercial imbalance 1561 02:16:57,830 --> 02:16:59,860 and then come here and say, but not in my backyard. 1562 02:17:00,520 --> 02:17:02,980 I got inconsistent, so I think you should allow 1563 02:17:02,980 --> 02:17:03,900 a program to proceed. 1564 02:17:04,440 --> 02:17:06,860 To be clear, I think this is bad for me and my neighbors, 1565 02:17:06,860 --> 02:17:09,460 but I think that Senate Bill 1, TIP, and the residential 1566 02:17:09,460 --> 02:17:11,160 and the mountains in our community are worse. 1567 02:17:11,760 --> 02:17:13,500 This is the lesser of four evils. 1568 02:17:14,280 --> 02:17:17,040 My neighbors have all have well-reasoned 1569 02:17:17,040 --> 02:17:19,120 the legitimate concerns of traffic, noise, 1570 02:17:19,420 --> 02:17:20,860 light pollution, and property values. 1571 02:17:21,380 --> 02:17:23,100 I hope that you listen to them and you take steps 1572 02:17:23,100 --> 02:17:24,320 to address their concerns. 1573 02:17:24,780 --> 02:17:26,320 I want to talk about something different. 1574 02:17:27,180 --> 02:17:29,880 There used to be a large grocery store on Main Street. 1575 02:17:30,220 --> 02:17:31,300 It closed in 2017. 1576 02:17:32,140 --> 02:17:34,700 Crunker bought that land and sat on it for five years, 1577 02:17:34,780 --> 02:17:36,580 before selling it to the current occupants. 1578 02:17:36,580 --> 02:17:37,680 they should be motor sports. 1579 02:17:38,480 --> 02:17:40,900 During that five years, the building site vacates and unused. 1580 02:17:41,460 --> 02:17:43,160 Crobert deliberately held that property 1581 02:17:43,160 --> 02:17:45,780 for the sole purpose of preventing any would-be competitor 1582 02:17:46,380 --> 02:17:48,260 from buying a term-keep grocery store 1583 02:17:48,260 --> 02:17:49,440 and competing against it. 1584 02:17:50,160 --> 02:17:52,560 Crobert decided that only an empty building in the middle of town 1585 02:17:52,560 --> 02:17:54,800 was better for their bottom line than the fair competition. 1586 02:17:55,640 --> 02:17:57,660 That probably made sense to a crobert accountant, 1587 02:17:58,200 --> 02:18:00,720 but the loss of a large anchor store was very hard 1588 02:18:00,720 --> 02:18:02,720 in the other small businesses on the south side 1589 02:18:02,720 --> 02:18:03,860 that depended on the traffic 1590 02:18:03,860 --> 02:18:05,520 at the back brochure store brought to the area. 1591 02:18:06,480 --> 02:18:09,760 It was an entirely legal, but purely selfish business decision 1592 02:18:09,760 --> 02:18:11,200 that curved the South Side businesses. 1593 02:18:11,820 --> 02:18:14,700 And I haven't forgotten, many of the people here tonight 1594 02:18:14,700 --> 02:18:16,360 don't want a croaker in the new location. 1595 02:18:17,060 --> 02:18:19,560 But even more than that, all of us collectively 1596 02:18:19,560 --> 02:18:22,500 don't want an abandoned croaker in that new location. 1597 02:18:22,880 --> 02:18:25,640 So it would be my hope, but if this development is approved, 1598 02:18:26,360 --> 02:18:28,300 the town government does everything in their power 1599 02:18:28,300 --> 02:18:31,620 to require croaker to either operate or sell the property 1600 02:18:31,620 --> 02:18:33,320 and the events of the store fails. 1601 02:18:34,100 --> 02:18:36,960 I wish Crobert good luck in long life on this new location, 1602 02:18:37,440 --> 02:18:39,980 but the store fails, the town's governing lobbies, 1603 02:18:40,220 --> 02:18:42,600 can't ensure it's a lot of Crobert to hold 1604 02:18:42,600 --> 02:18:45,060 the property vacant, simply to bring a quality 1605 02:18:45,060 --> 02:18:47,160 or some other competitor from bringing a foothold 1606 02:18:47,160 --> 02:18:48,980 to compete against their remaining stores. 1607 02:18:49,780 --> 02:18:51,900 Crobert has already proven the vehicle structure 1608 02:18:51,900 --> 02:18:53,940 of their landholdies to put their own interests 1609 02:18:53,940 --> 02:18:55,260 to get ahead of the communities. 1610 02:18:55,820 --> 02:18:58,880 Please take steps to ensure that they can't do that again. 1611 02:18:58,880 --> 02:19:04,900 And if you do not have the power to hold the accountable in that way, you have to vote 1612 02:19:04,900 --> 02:19:07,480 no, even though I think you're probably out of vote. 1613 02:19:11,440 --> 02:19:12,640 Eric Stemshorn? 1614 02:19:26,890 --> 02:19:28,310 I'm a registered road. 1615 02:19:29,050 --> 02:19:31,410 I live in the proper complex of sports across from this. 1616 02:19:33,270 --> 02:19:38,930 I think when these find a criteria, I think I'm in sports distance. 1617 02:19:39,270 --> 02:19:40,190 I'm incredibly low. 1618 02:19:40,990 --> 02:19:43,370 I really don't enjoy the gas station. 1619 02:19:43,830 --> 02:19:46,990 I really want to drive a gas station at all. 1620 02:19:48,130 --> 02:19:56,350 But, it's outside of browser and hasn't had a grocery store at least a decade now, and I know the part of that is kind of a crore-ers fault. 1621 02:19:58,250 --> 02:20:06,810 But, we need some kind of grocery store in that compound, and it's not the most ideal thing in this world, but I think that it would be awful. 1622 02:20:06,810 --> 02:20:12,770 Well, according to the USDA, it also knows supermarkets that are in a mile at a home, so it's going to be quite important. 1623 02:20:13,130 --> 02:20:14,530 It's almost like we don't have any diet. 1624 02:20:15,250 --> 02:20:21,010 It's true that a lot of people think it's not about the direction of town in the north or south, too. 1625 02:20:21,490 --> 02:20:25,710 Well, they haven't, but a grocery store that's, you know, it's close to people, 1626 02:20:25,870 --> 02:20:29,570 that's kind of making easier quicker and often cheaper to get fresh produce. 1627 02:20:30,370 --> 02:20:31,090 And all of the groceries. 1628 02:20:32,510 --> 02:20:39,190 The other reason is that the good expert in this location is walk building and white 1629 02:20:39,190 --> 02:20:39,490 building. 1630 02:20:39,970 --> 02:20:43,190 I used to live in my house for over a year and in front of me I used to live in white 1631 02:20:43,190 --> 02:20:43,370 building. 1632 02:20:44,290 --> 02:20:45,650 It was quite a bundle of exercise. 1633 02:20:46,010 --> 02:20:47,010 It was a necessary activity. 1634 02:20:47,570 --> 02:20:50,770 Let me fight for it as I needed it and not waste as much on the pole. 1635 02:20:51,350 --> 02:20:51,830 That one I moved. 1636 02:20:52,070 --> 02:20:52,670 It sounds like a town. 1637 02:20:53,110 --> 02:20:54,110 It definitely was only a car. 1638 02:20:55,250 --> 02:20:56,830 It's just one way to be in it. 1639 02:20:58,090 --> 02:21:05,050 The rest of the aim I've heard is very safe and the rest of the drone around me is nice, but it's pretty far from me. 1640 02:21:06,090 --> 02:21:07,150 So I usually stick to the car. 1641 02:21:07,550 --> 02:21:09,450 The book's location is right across from there. 1642 02:21:09,610 --> 02:21:10,510 I'll give you a couple more days. 1643 02:21:11,190 --> 02:21:12,510 It's only a mile from being up through now. 1644 02:21:13,910 --> 02:21:20,210 It'd be very easy to bike to aim in a few over close to the potential of watching the circuit so as well. 1645 02:21:23,470 --> 02:21:29,370 It would keep money in brownsburg, it's locations in South-East, and I don't know if it goes this way or this way. 1646 02:21:29,550 --> 02:21:34,910 I don't think, I'm not sure the only, I'm not the only one on that side. 1647 02:21:35,110 --> 02:21:39,430 I don't know if it goes the eight-long grade or three, it's just keep money in brownsburg. 1648 02:21:41,130 --> 02:21:46,010 It's also the job aspect, so it takes a lot of people to work at, I don't know, any of some work at the good home. 1649 02:21:46,010 --> 02:21:50,430 I don't know if you're going to answer it and there's a lot of scope that we're asking about the security of the day. 1650 02:21:52,450 --> 02:21:53,650 Press a good ranking level. 1651 02:21:56,970 --> 02:21:58,950 Once we're mentioning the people who have been affected. 1652 02:22:00,890 --> 02:22:03,270 I'm really going to show up this meeting on the 8th or 8th. 1653 02:22:03,270 --> 02:22:04,530 I've been here to have my hours. 1654 02:22:05,090 --> 02:22:06,930 A lot of people have been affected. 1655 02:22:09,310 --> 02:22:17,430 I'm going to suggest a reason this is not appropriate for anything that would need to be credible. 1656 02:22:18,290 --> 02:22:21,230 But as far as the reason goes, I would need a phone. 1657 02:22:23,680 --> 02:22:24,240 Thank you. 1658 02:22:25,400 --> 02:22:26,280 John Rapele. 1659 02:22:29,550 --> 02:22:34,190 Can we make sure everyone else's mics are off or getting feedback and can't have this one as loud as we need it? 1660 02:22:41,850 --> 02:22:45,070 Before you start my time, I want to tell you something is wrong with your system. 1661 02:22:45,070 --> 02:22:47,190 so I can't hear it even through the headphones. 1662 02:22:47,990 --> 02:22:49,250 So there's something wrong with the system. 1663 02:22:50,070 --> 02:22:51,610 Maybe the mic wasn't close enough. 1664 02:22:51,790 --> 02:22:53,790 Yeah, I think the mic was inadvertently turned off. 1665 02:22:54,810 --> 02:22:56,270 Green light wasn't on, okay. 1666 02:22:56,610 --> 02:22:59,210 Okay, because I couldn't hear the last four or five speakers. 1667 02:22:59,790 --> 02:23:01,030 You can start time now. 1668 02:23:01,970 --> 02:23:05,470 This is about obviously the zoning text amendment. 1669 02:23:06,310 --> 02:23:07,870 I like to keep this to zoning only. 1670 02:23:08,510 --> 02:23:10,110 All the other things we've talked about 1671 02:23:10,550 --> 02:23:13,450 are something that usually happens in the plan review 1672 02:23:13,450 --> 02:23:17,950 even so on, even though I understand why Kroger brought it here, point is we're deciding 1673 02:23:17,950 --> 02:23:23,230 what the zoning should be for this parcel, whether it be Kroger or any other commercial entity. 1674 02:23:23,850 --> 02:23:25,650 So that's really what we should focus on. 1675 02:23:26,270 --> 02:23:32,590 So a brief review of this parcel for this kind of chronologically would be that in 2010 1676 02:23:32,590 --> 02:23:38,690 this PUD was started and the diagram of that PUD did show the parcel as commercial, didn't 1677 02:23:38,690 --> 02:23:45,530 find low impact, high impact, it just said commercial and the 12th plus acre parcel was split 1678 02:23:45,530 --> 02:23:52,030 off from the larger parcel and created in 2012 and was placed in the commercial class code by 1679 02:23:52,030 --> 02:23:59,070 Henders County and the parcel has been classed and taxed accordingly as commercial vacant land. 1680 02:23:59,190 --> 02:24:03,910 Now some of this has already been discussed by staff and other people but I kind of want to review it. 1681 02:24:03,910 --> 02:24:12,030 The commercial parcel was sold by the developer in 2016 as an investment to a trust in California for over a million dollars. 1682 02:24:13,170 --> 02:24:16,790 That amount back then 10 years ago was commercial pricing. 1683 02:24:17,170 --> 02:24:19,930 They didn't buy it to just have sit-around. 1684 02:24:20,070 --> 02:24:21,750 I mean, it's commercial pricing at that time. 1685 02:24:22,390 --> 02:24:29,710 So the developer sold it to a commercial entity and the trust bought it as a commercial entity. 1686 02:24:29,930 --> 02:24:31,050 They wanted it to be commercial. 1687 02:24:31,050 --> 02:24:35,050 They paid taxes on it since that time as commercial. 1688 02:24:35,670 --> 02:24:39,030 The comp plan dated 2019 shows it commercial. 1689 02:24:39,990 --> 02:24:43,330 The future land use of 2021 shows it commercial. 1690 02:24:44,130 --> 02:24:48,370 All these things are not specifically designed, I'm going to define, but they are commercial. 1691 02:24:51,730 --> 02:24:54,050 I think this thing is more of a housekeeping thing. 1692 02:24:54,390 --> 02:25:01,070 You're just trying to clean up the paperwork so it matches the current UDO of the zoning 1693 02:25:01,070 --> 02:25:02,310 for the town of Brownsburg. 1694 02:25:02,310 --> 02:25:10,170 Now, as far as 267 goes, I lived on 267, just south of that property for 20 years. 1695 02:25:11,150 --> 02:25:17,830 From 1966 to 1986, and I knew, and it was all vacant land, both ways, just houses along 1696 02:25:17,830 --> 02:25:22,170 the 267, beyond that, nothing but farm fields. 1697 02:25:22,790 --> 02:25:28,550 All these residential developments have come in, wants to be expected to follow commercial 1698 02:25:28,550 --> 02:25:29,150 development. 1699 02:25:29,530 --> 02:25:31,190 I knew all along it was going to be commercial. 1700 02:25:31,190 --> 02:25:35,550 So this is the same thing passed right up the street into Brownsburg, of course they 1701 02:25:35,550 --> 02:25:35,870 are on. 1702 02:25:37,130 --> 02:25:43,790 And so basically on this documentation, I say this is administrative exercise for you guys 1703 02:25:44,510 --> 02:25:46,970 and it should be passed for that very reason. 1704 02:25:47,630 --> 02:25:48,050 Thank you. 1705 02:25:49,870 --> 02:25:50,590 Thank you. 1706 02:25:56,060 --> 02:25:56,860 That is all. 1707 02:25:57,580 --> 02:25:57,860 All right. 1708 02:25:58,500 --> 02:25:59,020 Thank you. 1709 02:26:02,040 --> 02:26:06,940 Would the applicant like to step up and rebutt? 1710 02:26:06,940 --> 02:26:07,760 I 1711 02:26:19,830 --> 02:26:31,830 would just like to reiterate the efforts that we are providing for buffering along the residential properties, and just reiterate that. 1712 02:26:31,850 --> 02:26:33,190 I just want to say, is the mic on? 1713 02:26:33,910 --> 02:26:34,930 It shows green. 1714 02:26:35,210 --> 02:26:36,510 Yeah, could you stay a little closer? 1715 02:26:37,010 --> 02:26:37,490 That's better, thank you. 1716 02:26:38,930 --> 02:26:48,670 And I just like to reiterate that in addition to what the code deems appropriate for residential against 1717 02:26:48,670 --> 02:27:06,190 commercial buffering we are providing that additional area on both sides that will have mature trees that are tall and have been there a while, they're pretty substantial in addition to what the code requires. 1718 02:27:07,290 --> 02:27:25,290 I'll also highlight that, I think I forgot to mention this in my answer to you, but we have reduced light pole heights since the neighborhood meeting as well, I think originally they were about 40 feet and we have lowered those to 25. 1719 02:27:27,690 --> 02:27:34,110 Also just like to hit back on the fact that couriers willing to facilitate the roadway 1720 02:27:34,110 --> 02:27:41,830 improvements that were outlined in the traffic study to alleviate any existing and future 1721 02:27:41,830 --> 02:27:43,730 traffic concerns. 1722 02:27:43,730 --> 02:27:46,310 We have a long process ahead of us. 1723 02:27:46,370 --> 02:27:53,410 We still have to go through our development plan review so we could take this back and assess 1724 02:27:53,410 --> 02:27:59,810 some things as far as the buffer is concerned but we do think we have a good proposal here to 1725 02:28:00,650 --> 02:28:06,510 shield the neighborhood and I do have Bri Ramsey with me from Kroger who'd like to say a couple of 1726 02:28:06,510 --> 02:28:06,790 things. 1727 02:28:09,370 --> 02:28:15,430 Hello again. First off I just wanted to come up to thank you all for your time as well as 1728 02:28:15,430 --> 02:28:21,950 the time of everybody here today and I wanted to make sure that you heard from me directly not just 1729 02:28:21,950 --> 02:28:25,490 that we were 97 feet off of where you're asking from. 1730 02:28:25,850 --> 02:28:37,150 So I have worked either for Kroger or Kroger adjacent as a consultant for my entire real 1731 02:28:37,150 --> 02:28:37,890 state career. 1732 02:28:38,550 --> 02:28:46,230 One of the reasons that's the case is because I believe that Kroger strives to be a good 1733 02:28:46,230 --> 02:28:47,090 corporate citizen. 1734 02:28:47,090 --> 02:28:53,230 And the way that we are going about that here is a couple ways. 1735 02:28:53,510 --> 02:28:59,710 One of the things, one fellow brought up is the question about incentives. 1736 02:29:00,710 --> 02:29:03,650 Kroger is not asking for any incentives here. 1737 02:29:03,790 --> 02:29:05,790 We are not asking for any tax abatements. 1738 02:29:08,270 --> 02:29:16,070 I understood that Brownsburg is a vibrant community and taxes are important for your schools. 1739 02:29:16,070 --> 02:29:18,470 And so we are not asking for any abatement of those. 1740 02:29:20,790 --> 02:29:28,470 The other thing that Macy commented on, and I'll just point out, is when designing this site, 1741 02:29:28,990 --> 02:29:36,990 one of the things that we tried to make sure that we could accommodate is keeping as many of the existing trees as we could. 1742 02:29:37,490 --> 02:29:44,570 So we've done a tree survey, which basically had our consultants go out and 1743 02:29:44,570 --> 02:29:47,230 and review what trees were in good condition 1744 02:29:48,270 --> 02:29:52,970 and therefore what could be saved during the development phase. 1745 02:29:54,050 --> 02:29:59,070 We did this for twofold, buffering. 1746 02:30:00,000 --> 02:30:28,480 That is a big one as well as the line of sight for the neighbors, right? And so we want to obviously we're wanting to build this neighborhood's grocery store. As part of that is working with the neighbors and meeting with them and coming away, trying to make concessions like the lowering of the lights, adding additional fencing that wasn't required. 1747 02:30:30,220 --> 02:30:37,240 and various things like that to make this their neighborhood grocery store and your new neighborhood grocery store. 1748 02:30:38,980 --> 02:30:48,140 The last thing I just want to touch on is a question that was brought up by the board, which was basically by Brownsburg. 1749 02:30:48,140 --> 02:30:57,300 why here, when why us, and Macy did a good job in explaining that, you know, part of my job 1750 02:30:57,300 --> 02:31:06,420 as a progress manager is to review neighborhoods and review trade areas to see where we should 1751 02:31:06,420 --> 02:31:14,240 go next, right? That's what I'm hired for. And Brownsburg, you're growing community. You guys are 1752 02:31:14,240 --> 02:31:18,360 We're doing a bunch of good things here, and we want to be a part of that. 1753 02:31:18,620 --> 02:31:31,160 And as part of this investment, we'll be putting $30 million into this piece of land in order to try to be that neighborhood market for you. 1754 02:31:31,480 --> 02:31:33,940 So that's all I have to say, thank you all. 1755 02:31:35,500 --> 02:31:37,120 Thank you for 1756 02:31:43,780 --> 02:31:45,600 staff and council. 1757 02:31:45,600 --> 02:31:48,740 So we did have a question about procedure. 1758 02:31:49,060 --> 02:31:50,840 Would anyone like to address that? 1759 02:31:51,340 --> 02:31:53,480 Thank you, Mr. Vice President of members of the commission. 1760 02:31:54,220 --> 02:32:00,080 In section 8.2 E1 of the UDO regarding application requirements for PUD ordinances, 1761 02:32:00,540 --> 02:32:04,420 it provides that if an application is filed by a property owner's authorized agent, 1762 02:32:04,680 --> 02:32:08,000 a consent form signed by the property owner must accompany the application. 1763 02:32:08,860 --> 02:32:12,960 Earlier this evening, Ms. Williams confirmed that consent form was received when the application was filed. 1764 02:32:12,960 --> 02:32:18,880 The required approvals for PUD ordinance amendments under Section 8.2G of the UDO provides 1765 02:32:18,880 --> 02:32:23,580 that an amendment to a PUD ordinance follows the same process as re-zones for map amendments 1766 02:32:23,580 --> 02:32:24,460 and text amendments. 1767 02:32:25,320 --> 02:32:30,840 Under Section 8.3B1 of the UDO, for amendments to planned unit development text signatures 1768 02:32:30,840 --> 02:32:37,080 of at least 50% of the owners in the sub-district or applicable area impacted by the text change 1769 02:32:37,080 --> 02:32:41,100 must be included in the application as owners authorizing the request. 1770 02:32:41,100 --> 02:32:54,080 That's similarly under section 8.1A of the UDO, proposals to amend the zoning map may be initiated by the Plan Commission, the town council, or through an application signed by property owners of at least 50% of the land involved. 1771 02:32:54,980 --> 02:33:01,380 As Miss Williams summarized in her staff report, staff determined that this is a separate sub-district and that the 50% threshold was met. 1772 02:33:02,320 --> 02:33:18,100 Finally, I'm not aware of the outreach reference in August by the first remonstrator but Ms. Williams mentioned to me this evening that perhaps the remonstrator had an incorrect email address for me based on correspondence that she saw throughout the written comments that the remonstrator had an incorrect email address to the extent that was used to attempt to reach me. 1773 02:33:18,720 --> 02:33:21,260 If staff has anything further add in that regard, I welcome your perspective. 1774 02:33:21,760 --> 02:33:22,020 Thank you. 1775 02:33:22,400 --> 02:33:22,620 All 1776 02:33:25,430 --> 02:33:26,010 right, thank you. 1777 02:33:38,930 --> 02:33:42,490 So at this point, I think we'd have any discussion with the commission. 1778 02:33:48,080 --> 02:33:55,140 Do we have a round of questions first, and is there a rebuttal allowed again for community, or is it just one round? 1779 02:33:56,220 --> 02:33:59,780 Yes, so at this point pursuant to your rules of procedure, you're at the commissioners questioning. 1780 02:34:00,300 --> 02:34:07,120 You can ask questions of staff, the applicant, other commissioners for any clarifications made by a person, or from the public. 1781 02:34:07,940 --> 02:34:11,220 And does the public get another round of rebuttal after hearing these answers? 1782 02:34:11,220 --> 02:34:14,780 No, it's just an exchange of questions. It's not necessarily a time limitation. 1783 02:34:15,440 --> 02:34:15,440 Okay. 1784 02:34:18,120 --> 02:34:20,160 Let me ask these questions for you first. 1785 02:34:20,380 --> 02:34:23,300 Let me make sure I'm not jumping ahead of where these questions should be asked. 1786 02:34:23,760 --> 02:34:29,020 There was a question of semi entry points. Is that something that is addressed in future? 1787 02:34:29,600 --> 02:34:35,900 Or would that be an applicable question in the stage of where they expect semis to enter? 1788 02:34:35,900 --> 02:35:04,600 I think that's a good question for the applicant we did discuss it at Tech Review and to the extent that they were also asked for the semis that would be entering off north field on the westernmost entrance for the supplies for Kruger that they would place signs that said beyond that point local traffic only to try to avoid any of the trucks going into the neighborhood. 1789 02:35:04,600 --> 02:35:10,400 Okay, should you think I should confirm, or are you saying you already know that the entry point is anticipated to be off Northfield? 1790 02:35:11,100 --> 02:35:11,540 Yes. 1791 02:35:13,360 --> 02:35:20,480 The money for infrastructure was asked to, are they required to make a contribution to infrastructure upgrades? 1792 02:35:21,700 --> 02:35:30,160 They're required to build and provide all the funding for the identified transportation improvements in the traffic study. 1793 02:35:30,160 --> 02:35:35,640 Okay, would anything determine later after this is approved is on the town? 1794 02:35:38,250 --> 02:35:44,390 Yeah, that's accurate just like any other subdivision or commercial property once it's on the tax rolls 1795 02:35:44,390 --> 02:35:48,530 It's the public right away for the town to maintain no matter what it is. Thanks, Sean. 1796 02:35:48,990 --> 02:35:52,070 I guess you just follow up on that. Yeah, infrastructure 1797 02:35:53,330 --> 02:36:00,610 In, you know, existing utilities different things are impacted by this development that would be the responsibility of the developer at the time of construction to 1798 02:36:01,530 --> 02:36:11,630 Yes, when they do the reviews of, you know, all of the utilities if there's something extraordinary at a lift station or anything, they would need that's on them. 1799 02:36:12,090 --> 02:36:12,750 Thank you. 1800 02:36:15,530 --> 02:36:22,950 As far as writing anything in to ensure that we don't have another vacant crowbar on our hands, I don't believe that's legal, correct? 1801 02:36:23,410 --> 02:36:42,050 I would caution the commission against getting involved with private property owners and their ability to contract relative to their real estate, to the extent that is going to be discussed, I would strongly encourage it to be one with the applicant, to the extent that they would voluntarily agree to such a restriction, but I would not unilaterally impose it at this point without further discussion. 1802 02:36:42,050 --> 02:36:49,630 Okay. Also, if the PUD is approved, can it only be a grocery store going forward without? 1803 02:36:53,910 --> 02:36:54,410 Yes. 1804 02:36:55,130 --> 02:36:57,290 Okay. And that's another PUD is approved. 1805 02:36:58,110 --> 02:37:00,430 If it's approved, it would be approved for a grocery. 1806 02:37:00,730 --> 02:37:09,910 And if something changed, they either didn't build or something happened, there'd be another PUD amendment if a different use came in. 1807 02:37:09,910 --> 02:37:14,310 Okay, discussion of wells was brought up. 1808 02:37:19,760 --> 02:37:23,860 How do we protect the residents from wells being contamination? 1809 02:37:24,300 --> 02:37:31,840 What's the typical process to ensure that a new business did not impact the health of the local wells? 1810 02:37:33,280 --> 02:37:35,340 Is that part of the SWPPP? 1811 02:37:35,640 --> 02:37:36,320 That's correct. 1812 02:37:36,780 --> 02:37:41,360 So with any development, even the subdivision, they have to do certain practices during construction. 1813 02:37:41,360 --> 02:37:47,400 And then they also have to have the water's essentially cleaner leaving than was when it arrived 1814 02:37:48,280 --> 02:37:53,780 So there's separators and things like that for the storm sewers and any any potential spills 1815 02:38:00,130 --> 02:38:01,550 Sorry, just make sure they got everything 1816 02:38:13,400 --> 02:38:14,780 I think I got everything 1817 02:38:17,640 --> 02:38:25,160 Miss Oman, do you have any additional questions for the applicant staff or now anyone who spoke mr. Cleley? 1818 02:38:25,660 --> 02:38:26,840 I have a couple items 1819 02:38:27,740 --> 02:38:32,900 This is for Elizabeth, going back to for staff, going back to the sign amendment. 1820 02:38:33,700 --> 02:38:38,020 Is this consistent with I would handle other amendments, and is this signage consistent 1821 02:38:38,020 --> 02:38:42,560 with the other Croger that was built a few years ago farther up north? 1822 02:38:45,500 --> 02:38:51,020 I can't tell you exactly, but I would tell you that I do think it's consistent with the existing Croger. 1823 02:38:51,140 --> 02:38:58,320 What makes that sign on the front edge of the building larger that is the way we calculate signs? 1824 02:38:58,320 --> 02:39:09,200 we take a rectangle around the outer limits of the sign, and because of those hooks that they have on the K and the G, it puts it beyond there. 1825 02:39:09,620 --> 02:39:13,980 We don't calculate signs by individual little squares, but if we did it would make it. 1826 02:39:14,860 --> 02:39:18,700 Okay, thank you. And then I wanted to clarify around the 50% ruling. 1827 02:39:19,120 --> 02:39:26,660 And so I just want to understand, we said a subsection, it's really just the property that is being developed is the applicable subsection. 1828 02:39:26,660 --> 02:39:33,900 And therefore, there's a single owner, so their agreement to this satisfies the 50% of my understanding that correctly. 1829 02:39:34,340 --> 02:39:34,800 Correct. 1830 02:39:35,280 --> 02:39:36,360 Okay, thank you. 1831 02:39:36,600 --> 02:39:39,900 And then my last question is, I know I asked earlier about the Masonry wall. 1832 02:39:40,260 --> 02:39:46,020 I assume that if that's a topic, if we go forward and that's a topic I'm still interested in, that could be addressed later. 1833 02:39:46,180 --> 02:39:46,400 Correct? 1834 02:39:46,960 --> 02:39:48,160 That's part of the development plan. 1835 02:39:48,320 --> 02:39:52,240 There would be another opportunity during the development plan if this were to be approved. 1836 02:39:52,700 --> 02:39:53,640 Okay, thank you. 1837 02:39:55,420 --> 02:39:56,220 Anything additional? 1838 02:39:56,500 --> 02:39:58,800 A couple other things, just notes, comments. 1839 02:39:59,760 --> 02:40:01,300 So one, we don't have it. 1840 02:40:01,360 --> 02:40:06,680 None of the other grocery stations, grocery stores, are in a local commercial zoned area. 1841 02:40:08,200 --> 02:40:14,860 Two, careful what you wish for, because some is going to get built here, and we've seen this before where something bad is coming back after this too. 1842 02:40:15,000 --> 02:40:18,920 So, not only the other thing, another point that everybody has crowdies to understand too. 1843 02:40:19,840 --> 02:40:24,100 We're going to send a recommendation, the town council can't overrule that recommendation. 1844 02:40:24,100 --> 02:40:26,940 as we saw in the last week's council meeting. 1845 02:40:27,320 --> 02:40:32,280 So you need to understand that that is something you need to pay as much attention to as tonight's meeting. 1846 02:40:32,680 --> 02:40:34,300 So thank you. 1847 02:40:35,360 --> 02:40:35,860 Mr. Domin. 1848 02:40:36,880 --> 02:40:43,040 This was for the applicant, and I think Mrs. Ramsey, you mentioned that a tree survey was done. 1849 02:40:43,740 --> 02:40:49,920 Do you know how many trees were going to survive the number? 1850 02:41:11,720 --> 02:41:12,320 Okay, 1851 02:41:16,100 --> 02:41:25,140 we surveyed approximately 300 and based on our estimate, just sitting back there, we believe approximately 100 will be staying. 1852 02:41:25,780 --> 02:41:29,900 Okay, and none of those are going to take the place of the required. 1853 02:41:30,380 --> 02:41:32,540 No, and then we're adding the required traces. 1854 02:41:32,540 --> 02:41:40,180 Yeah. Yeah. Then also I think you guys mentioned that you were going to maintain the 1855 02:41:40,180 --> 02:41:49,920 Heritage Hill signage for the subdivision. So there's a existing fence there and we're 1856 02:41:49,920 --> 02:41:56,760 keeping as much of that as we can in order to but we have to cut some of it down to allow for 1857 02:41:56,760 --> 02:42:02,960 sight triangles. As for the sign, I need double check with Macy on that, but there we go, 1858 02:42:03,160 --> 02:42:03,520 perfect. 1859 02:42:06,520 --> 02:42:15,580 As part of the fence aesthetic, I suppose there is a, I think it's like kind of like a 1860 02:42:15,580 --> 02:42:25,080 masonry wall entrance sign at the corner of green in Northfield. That's attached to that 1861 02:42:25,080 --> 02:42:29,280 Fencing that I think we're looking to maintain it will stay 1862 02:42:32,200 --> 02:42:42,180 had you discussed that with the homeowners association to see if they wanted that sign there or if it could be moved down to where their streets are 1863 02:42:43,500 --> 02:42:49,380 We didn't ask that in the neighborhood meeting. I believe the fence was brought up 1864 02:42:50,320 --> 02:42:52,940 You know at least one question during that meeting 1865 02:42:52,940 --> 02:43:01,740 And we said that we were going to try and keep as much as possible and out of that we kept more, basically. 1866 02:43:01,960 --> 02:43:05,640 But we did not speak to the science specifically or if they would like it moved. 1867 02:43:06,200 --> 02:43:10,300 I would just think moving it further down past the Kroger. 1868 02:43:11,160 --> 02:43:18,100 I mean, whether they want to keep that one or not, but then people would know of now you're entering into a subdivision. 1869 02:43:18,100 --> 02:43:19,000 I 1870 02:43:24,210 --> 02:43:31,430 have a question on the tree survey, has that been submitted to the town and if not could 1871 02:43:31,430 --> 02:43:36,470 a copy of that be submitted in time for the town council meeting when this comes up again? 1872 02:43:36,730 --> 02:43:39,490 Yes, it was not submitted but we can. 1873 02:43:39,850 --> 02:43:40,010 Okay. 1874 02:43:40,210 --> 02:43:45,310 I think it'd be helpful to see, you know, specifically for residents which trees would be stained and 1875 02:43:45,310 --> 02:43:45,590 going. 1876 02:43:45,890 --> 02:43:49,670 I think we can maybe get that exact number of trees too. 1877 02:43:50,270 --> 02:43:50,870 That'd be good information. 1878 02:43:51,150 --> 02:43:51,350 Thank you. 1879 02:43:51,350 --> 02:44:04,110 I don't go far, but I think speaking to the entrance that whole area is what that signs for work is that road was designed to connect to the other north field drive eventually. 1880 02:44:05,450 --> 02:44:09,430 So it will be our own little 465 one day. 1881 02:44:10,890 --> 02:44:11,670 Thank you. 1882 02:44:13,030 --> 02:44:14,870 I gave Jeff a hard time earlier. 1883 02:44:15,890 --> 02:44:18,610 Mr. Dorman, you have any other questions or comments? 1884 02:44:20,770 --> 02:44:21,630 The fence? 1885 02:44:22,130 --> 02:44:22,330 Yes. 1886 02:44:22,550 --> 02:44:23,410 The privacy fence. 1887 02:44:23,710 --> 02:44:28,170 Is there any willingness to extend that along the Western boundary? 1888 02:44:28,350 --> 02:44:29,690 I know you've already done it further. 1889 02:44:31,690 --> 02:44:40,710 Yeah, I mean, to your point, we have extended it further based on conversations with the neighbors as well as staff. 1890 02:44:40,710 --> 02:44:47,970 And I think that it's part of the development plan approval process that we'll have to go through that is something that we could discuss for sure 1891 02:44:47,970 --> 02:44:53,430 So that could be discussed further maybe not even continuous, but maybe to protect the other owners view 1892 02:44:53,430 --> 02:44:59,810 Are you talking about the south sorry just to clarify the south elevation or the west yes next 1893 02:45:01,860 --> 02:45:02,380 Okay. 1894 02:45:06,980 --> 02:45:16,600 I think I already know the answer to this is the whole parking lot going to be curbed on the south side also for stormwater retention and capture. Yes. Okay. 1895 02:45:26,740 --> 02:45:37,080 The rest are just kind of comments. Similar to Mr. Humphries. I already spoke about Norfield Drive going all the way around eventually. So that is a not necessarily a neighborhood street. 1896 02:45:42,310 --> 02:45:50,360 I'd like to speak to the park comment in the UDO, excuse me, that the PD, the neighborhood 1897 02:45:50,360 --> 02:45:56,860 supposed to maintain hundreds of makers of park land that were sold at tax sale. 1898 02:45:57,580 --> 02:46:01,620 So obviously it was not important to keep it so I'm not sure that argument for the park 1899 02:46:01,620 --> 02:46:03,740 is relevant for this parcel. 1900 02:46:10,500 --> 02:46:13,980 Tax exempt, what was that note for? 1901 02:46:15,260 --> 02:46:20,200 I should say open space, not Parkland, but it was required by their 2010 documentation 1902 02:46:20,200 --> 02:46:25,080 that 110 acres be reserved as open space by the HOA, and 1903 02:46:27,800 --> 02:46:29,480 that is all that I have at the 1904 02:46:29,480 --> 02:46:29,720 moment. 1905 02:46:32,320 --> 02:46:32,460 All right. 1906 02:46:32,580 --> 02:46:32,800 Thank you. 1907 02:46:32,880 --> 02:46:34,880 I don't have any questions remaining for the applicant. 1908 02:46:35,040 --> 02:46:35,240 Thank you. 1909 02:46:35,440 --> 02:46:35,700 Thank you. 1910 02:46:37,100 --> 02:46:41,460 I think at this time, I think, probably discussion among the commission. 1911 02:46:45,280 --> 02:46:52,260 Mr. Honest President, just to confirm, as you're discussing one thing that I think we would like some clarification on to the extent of motion is brought forward. 1912 02:46:53,300 --> 02:47:03,220 No matter which side that is, if it is one to send a favorable recommendation on either the text and or the map, to make sure that the commitments that you're going to require are very clear. 1913 02:47:03,220 --> 02:47:07,100 We have a few notes, but just wanted to mention that before you actually get to a motion. 1914 02:47:08,620 --> 02:47:09,960 That was one of my questions. 1915 02:47:10,180 --> 02:47:15,220 So if we could maybe run through that current list, because the items I had were just what 1916 02:47:15,220 --> 02:47:20,480 Mr. Pat's brought up about extending the fence and then getting the tree survey submitted. 1917 02:47:21,760 --> 02:47:26,860 I think they should be attached to both the map amendment and the text amendment. 1918 02:47:30,800 --> 02:47:33,640 Yeah, so if we can just go through those for the record. 1919 02:47:33,640 --> 02:47:37,500 If you go through the current list that you have and we can discuss. 1920 02:47:38,080 --> 02:47:43,740 What I have if the applicant agrees is the hours of operation that they stated from 1921 02:47:43,740 --> 02:47:51,900 six to ten and moving the fence, which we will address during development plan review to 1922 02:47:51,900 --> 02:47:57,060 the top of the embankment on both the south and the west sides, 1923 02:48:00,380 --> 02:48:01,660 that's what I have. 1924 02:48:04,200 --> 02:48:04,600 Okay, 1925 02:48:06,920 --> 02:48:21,660 I guess for clarification, maybe from the applicant, the business hours would typically be 6 to 10, but, you know, typically, gas, you know, are 24-7. I guess you could speak to that, please. 1926 02:48:28,820 --> 02:48:30,160 Should have gotten a seat at the front. 1927 02:48:32,180 --> 02:48:42,240 Yes, so normally our fuel centers operate manned hours, 6 to 10, and then 24-7 with overnight 1928 02:48:42,240 --> 02:48:43,460 card-only uses. 1929 02:48:44,100 --> 02:48:55,100 I will say that if there's a condition that modifies that card sales, then that could 1930 02:48:55,100 --> 02:48:57,280 be something that could be agreed to. 1931 02:48:58,560 --> 02:49:07,160 Okay, so you're open to the the man's hours of 6 to 10 and would discuss the 24, 7 card hours. 1932 02:49:07,400 --> 02:49:08,820 Yes, thank you. 1933 02:49:08,860 --> 02:49:08,980 Yep. 1934 02:49:09,400 --> 02:49:10,420 I'll stay up here this time. 1935 02:49:10,600 --> 02:49:10,720 Okay. 1936 02:49:16,390 --> 02:49:18,670 Mr. Humphries, anything you'd like to discuss? 1937 02:49:19,370 --> 02:49:19,450 Yeah. 1938 02:49:20,990 --> 02:49:31,350 I just the reason why we have differences zoning and criterion for those is because we want different things at different places, obviously. 1939 02:49:31,350 --> 02:49:39,350 And I feel to see that local commercial is intent was for this large of 1940 02:49:39,350 --> 02:49:43,890 a grocery store, a smaller one maybe, one that would be able to be on the road and 1941 02:49:43,890 --> 02:49:46,910 have the parking of the back so you don't have as much impact to the residential 1942 02:49:46,910 --> 02:49:52,890 behind it. Those kind of things make sense to me why this was zoned differently than 1943 02:49:52,890 --> 02:49:58,150 other properties that we have the same type of grocery store that. So that's the 1944 02:49:58,150 --> 02:50:09,290 The one that I had the hardest time getting passed is there certainly was an intent for the zoning and the comp plan on this and this does not feel like a fit for that for that zoning. 1945 02:50:09,710 --> 02:50:15,850 So that's the one that sticks out glaringly to me the most anytime we put in a business, it's going to have impact to the neighbors. 1946 02:50:16,770 --> 02:50:25,570 A lot of those can be addressed through requirements such as we're going over now, but that one seems to be the one that you can't overcome because that building is not getting smaller. 1947 02:50:26,590 --> 02:50:55,430 Yeah, I'd say I share the same concerns kind of looking at should this be if we look at a zoning should it be C3 or C2, I do think C2 fits better, which going by this being a grocery store large is permitted in the C2, but if you look at retail, that's capped out at 50,000 square feet but there is as you've mentioned earlier, you know, this may not be preferred, but something. 1948 02:50:55,430 --> 02:51:09,290 I mean, else could come in and I think, you know, as a comprehensive plan shows, this is a commercial property, I think it, the question really becomes is this the intensity that should be a wild on it. 1949 02:51:09,390 --> 02:51:10,970 That's kind of the question that I have. 1950 02:51:11,810 --> 02:51:15,390 This would be any other commissioners having any other items to address. 1951 02:51:15,390 --> 02:51:20,650 We had so much call for our grocery store on the south side and here we are with this. 1952 02:51:20,930 --> 02:51:24,790 So it's interesting how that has changed and such a short amount of time. 1953 02:51:25,470 --> 02:51:29,190 Well, I think the town has grown since 2010 and the need. 1954 02:51:30,270 --> 02:51:36,090 We are, we keep complaining about all the traffic that keeps head north. 1955 02:51:36,090 --> 02:51:42,890 Here's an opportunity to help that with providing a grocery store on the south side 1956 02:51:44,470 --> 02:51:51,410 You know, we say oh, well we gave them myer. Well myers on the northeast side of town. I 1957 02:51:51,410 --> 02:51:53,910 Mean it's not the south side. We're losing all these 1958 02:51:54,630 --> 02:51:55,730 commercial dollars to 1959 02:51:55,730 --> 02:51:57,830 quite please 1960 02:51:57,830 --> 02:52:03,250 I mean if I'm in the south side of Brownsburg, I'm heading to Avon 1961 02:52:03,870 --> 02:52:04,670 you know 1962 02:52:04,670 --> 02:52:07,290 Well, why are we not capturing that? 1963 02:52:08,230 --> 02:52:20,170 I will say that Wal-Mart has brought a property at the intersection of 2.67 and 300 for a neighborhood store. 1964 02:52:20,830 --> 02:52:24,150 But they haven't brought anything to the town yet. 1965 02:52:27,340 --> 02:52:30,720 If two stores are looking, then that means there's got to be the need. 1966 02:52:31,320 --> 02:52:39,640 Yeah, and just for clear for confirmation, I believe the property mishomans referring to is currently zone C3. 1967 02:52:42,210 --> 02:52:43,050 I can look it up. 1968 02:52:43,570 --> 02:52:45,510 Yeah, let him look it up. I'm not sure. 1969 02:52:56,150 --> 02:52:57,730 Yes, it's zone to C3. 1970 02:52:58,790 --> 02:52:59,390 Thank you. 1971 02:53:05,110 --> 02:53:07,490 Is there any additional discussion? 1972 02:53:08,930 --> 02:53:12,890 I recognize the concerns of the residents and what we have up here. 1973 02:53:13,290 --> 02:53:19,100 And we all know that the people that are happy with what we're doing aren't here. 1974 02:53:19,100 --> 02:53:32,900 So that's 30,000 people, we've got 350, I don't know what that percentage is but it's I mean I think I think you and I know that the people that are happy are aren't coming. 1975 02:53:40,820 --> 02:53:44,780 If there's no other discussion, I'll entertain a motion. 1976 02:53:46,480 --> 02:53:49,520 No, we have to vote on two different things, right? 1977 02:53:49,720 --> 02:53:50,180 Correct. 1978 02:53:50,520 --> 02:53:51,080 Thank you. 1979 02:53:52,900 --> 02:53:54,940 Does the order... 1980 02:53:54,940 --> 02:53:55,100 You're 1981 02:53:59,100 --> 02:54:00,960 going to have two separate votes. 1982 02:54:00,960 --> 02:54:04,740 The first is going to be on PCZT-26-2. 1983 02:54:05,540 --> 02:54:06,840 That's the zoning text amendment. 1984 02:54:11,190 --> 02:54:11,770 All right, thank you. 1985 02:54:13,870 --> 02:54:18,230 All right, is there a motion for PCZT-26-2 1986 02:54:18,750 --> 02:54:20,130 Kroger zoning text amendment? 1987 02:54:20,130 --> 02:54:21,250 Mr. 1988 02:54:30,260 --> 02:54:40,460 Miller, I would like to propose a unfavorable recommendation for PCZT-26-2, zoning tax amendment. 1989 02:54:43,150 --> 02:54:47,030 Typically provide a criteria for an unfavorable recommendation. 1990 02:54:47,490 --> 02:54:50,170 It was a criteria one, was a comp plan. 1991 02:54:50,870 --> 02:54:54,590 I don't feel it meets the comprehensive plan. 1992 02:54:55,150 --> 02:54:57,290 What was intended for local commercial. 1993 02:55:02,520 --> 02:55:02,840 Second. 1994 02:55:02,840 --> 02:55:13,800 And we have a motion for an unfavorable recommendation for PC, ZT-26-2, Kroger, Zoning Text Amendment. 1995 02:55:15,080 --> 02:55:24,700 All those in favourable, in favour of an unfavorable recommendation, please state I, I, those opposed with nay. 1996 02:55:25,020 --> 02:55:25,440 Nay. 1997 02:55:25,940 --> 02:55:27,240 All right, roll call, Ms. Homan. 1998 02:55:28,340 --> 02:55:29,280 In favourable? 1999 02:55:30,220 --> 02:55:31,020 Unfavorable. 2000 02:55:31,440 --> 02:55:32,240 Unfavorable. 2001 02:55:32,240 --> 02:55:33,560 Unfavorable. 2002 02:55:36,300 --> 02:55:38,060 Sorry, let's redo that. 2003 02:55:38,700 --> 02:55:41,780 Are you in favor of an unfavorable recommendation? 2004 02:55:44,080 --> 02:55:45,220 In favor. 2005 02:55:46,420 --> 02:55:47,420 In favor. 2006 02:55:47,900 --> 02:55:48,360 In favor. 2007 02:55:48,700 --> 02:55:49,200 In favor. 2008 02:55:49,680 --> 02:55:50,240 Opposed. 2009 02:55:50,780 --> 02:55:51,240 Opposed. 2010 02:55:51,660 --> 02:55:52,260 Thank you. 2011 02:55:52,380 --> 02:55:59,340 So we have a vote of 4-2 for an unfavorable recommendation for PCZT-26-2, Kroger's 2012 02:55:59,340 --> 02:56:07,200 Do we have a motion for PCMA-26-4, Kroger-Rizone? 2013 02:56:08,120 --> 02:56:15,580 Commissioner, I would like to make an unfavorable recommendation for PCMA-26-4, the Rizone. 2014 02:56:16,480 --> 02:56:17,120 Second. 2015 02:56:17,680 --> 02:56:18,640 Same criteria. 2016 02:56:19,060 --> 02:56:19,480 Same criteria. 2017 02:56:19,820 --> 02:56:20,020 Thank you. 2018 02:56:20,440 --> 02:56:27,840 All right, we have a motion and a second for an unfavorable recommendation for PCMA-26-4, Kroger-Rizone. 2019 02:56:27,840 --> 02:56:34,240 And all those unfavorable recommendations, please state aye. 2020 02:56:36,540 --> 02:56:37,800 Those opposed with nay? 2021 02:56:38,240 --> 02:56:38,520 Aye. 2022 02:56:39,460 --> 02:56:39,820 Roll call. 2023 02:56:40,140 --> 02:56:41,660 Ms. Homan, are you unfavorable? 2024 02:56:41,660 --> 02:56:43,240 In favor. 2025 02:56:43,480 --> 02:56:44,000 In favor. 2026 02:56:44,300 --> 02:56:44,880 In favor. 2027 02:56:45,160 --> 02:56:45,700 Opposed. 2028 02:56:46,000 --> 02:56:46,220 Opposed. 2029 02:56:46,720 --> 02:56:47,180 Thank you. 2030 02:56:47,360 --> 02:56:54,740 We have unfavorable recommendations by vote of 4 to 2 for PCMA-26-4. 2031 02:56:59,300 --> 02:57:04,600 I will now close the public hearing at the time of 903. 2032 02:57:21,540 --> 02:57:21,640 All right. 2033 02:57:21,740 --> 02:57:23,340 Next item is new public hearings. 2034 02:57:23,620 --> 02:57:24,040 We have none. 2035 02:57:25,280 --> 02:57:26,900 Communication and committee reports. 2036 02:57:27,100 --> 02:57:27,460 We have none. 2037 02:57:28,000 --> 02:57:28,760 Miscellaneous business. 2038 02:57:29,020 --> 02:57:29,560 We have none. 2039 02:57:30,260 --> 02:57:31,260 Administrative filings. 2040 02:57:31,280 --> 02:57:31,940 We have none. 2041 02:57:32,460 --> 02:57:34,240 Cases filed for future meetings. 2042 02:57:36,660 --> 02:57:39,220 So we have three cases filed for next month. 2043 02:57:39,220 --> 02:57:43,760 plus the Lions Transincorporated that was continued this evening. 2044 02:57:44,860 --> 02:57:51,200 The first being PCMA 26-5, it's for Woodland Reserve, Fisher Alms is wanting to re-zone 2045 02:57:51,200 --> 02:57:54,840 institutional zone land to R2 for a single family subdivision. 2046 02:57:55,180 --> 02:57:58,920 This is just east of the Calvary Christian Church on Northfield Drive. 2047 02:58:00,720 --> 02:58:04,860 Then PCVA 26-3 is the Arcanoff Street Vacation. 2048 02:58:05,360 --> 02:58:09,100 The track to the south will be vacated and the track to the east will be dedicated right 2049 02:58:09,100 --> 02:58:12,660 right away. This is at the corner of Enderly and Grant Street. 2050 02:58:13,660 --> 02:58:17,480 And then finally we have CPSP, 26-10. 2051 02:58:17,900 --> 02:58:21,380 It's for Arburn Ridge, West, Section 1, the Secondary Plot. 2052 02:58:21,660 --> 02:58:25,780 This will have 34 of the ADA approved lots shown for Section 1. 2053 02:58:25,960 --> 02:58:29,600 More Secondary Plots will follow in the future to accommodate the rest of the lots. 2054 02:58:30,060 --> 02:58:33,040 This is over on 450 North and 500 East. 2055 02:58:36,800 --> 02:58:38,500 All right, thank you. Do we have anything else for today? 2056 02:58:39,920 --> 02:58:44,460 We have a motion for adjournment. 2057 02:58:44,660 --> 02:58:45,660 So, film moved. 2058 02:58:46,100 --> 02:58:46,340 Thank you. 2059 02:58:48,800 --> 02:58:49,500 We're adjourned.