1 00:00:06,799 --> 00:00:11,679 We are unmuted. 2 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:14,880 » Fantastic. Uh, welcome everybody to our 3 00:00:11,679 --> 00:00:16,960 January 14th, 2026 uh, regular council 4 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:18,640 meeting, first one of the year. I'd like 5 00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:20,400 to respectfully acknowledge the land on 6 00:00:18,640 --> 00:00:22,240 which we're gathered today is the 7 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:24,880 unseated territory, the Komox First 8 00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:26,480 Nation, the traditional keepers of um, 9 00:00:24,880 --> 00:00:29,119 this land. 10 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:30,720 Um, we do have an introduction of late 11 00:00:29,119 --> 00:00:37,040 items. Uh, the Courtney Air Park 12 00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:39,120 Association letter of request and uh, 13 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:41,920 excellent. Any questions or comments? 14 00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:43,920 Seeing none, all those in favor? Any 15 00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:45,920 opposed? And motion carries. Thank you 16 00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:47,200 for that. And we'll move in adoption of 17 00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:50,960 minutes. And we have a regular council 18 00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:53,920 minutes from December 10th to 19 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:55,760 any errors or omissions? See none, we'll 20 00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:58,160 accept those unanimously and we'll move 21 00:00:55,760 --> 00:01:01,640 into the parks and wreck um meeting 22 00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:01,640 minutes as well. 23 00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:07,760 » Excellent. Any errors or emissions? 24 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:10,320 Seeing none, uh we'll accept those 25 00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:12,799 unanimously as well. And with that, 26 00:01:10,320 --> 00:01:14,880 we'll move into our first delegation uh 27 00:01:12,799 --> 00:01:17,680 with the mayor, Maryanne Me Ward from 28 00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:19,360 the city of Burlington, Ontario. Uh, 29 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:21,280 Mayor Ward, it was a pleasure uh 30 00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:23,360 speaking with you uh previously and 31 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:26,720 thank you so much for joining us today. 32 00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:29,360 Uh the the topic of the discussion uh is 33 00:01:26,720 --> 00:01:32,320 the elect respect uh campaign and uh 34 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:34,479 with that I'll turn it over to you. 35 00:01:32,320 --> 00:01:36,240 » Well, thank you so much Mayor Wells for 36 00:01:34,479 --> 00:01:38,240 inviting me to be here this evening 37 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:41,119 virtually and thank you to all members 38 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:43,520 of council. I had the opportunity uh 39 00:01:41,119 --> 00:01:46,720 with my husband to travel through your 40 00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:49,439 fine city earlier this year. actually 41 00:01:46,720 --> 00:01:52,000 last year um and in and just absolutely 42 00:01:49,439 --> 00:01:54,880 loved being there. So we uh I'm a 43 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:57,119 British Columbia an honorary BCN I think 44 00:01:54,880 --> 00:02:00,159 if that's the right the way to say it 45 00:01:57,119 --> 00:02:01,600 but thanks for for inviting me to uh 46 00:02:00,159 --> 00:02:03,840 speak a little bit about the elect 47 00:02:01,600 --> 00:02:06,320 respect uh resolution what it is and 48 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:08,479 what it isn't and I want to uh really 49 00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:10,560 extend my sincere thanks to Mayor Wells 50 00:02:08,479 --> 00:02:14,000 for bringing this forward and for your 51 00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:17,440 support mayor for elect respect. Uh this 52 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:19,599 began as really a conversation among um 53 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:22,160 Halton elected representatives who are 54 00:02:19,599 --> 00:02:24,160 women. We have a coffee group that meets 55 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:26,400 a couple of times a year for support. 56 00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:29,840 And one of our meetings we started 57 00:02:26,400 --> 00:02:32,319 talking about whether we would encourage 58 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:33,920 uh our friends, our daughters. Uh my 59 00:02:32,319 --> 00:02:36,800 husband and I have two daughters and a 60 00:02:33,920 --> 00:02:40,080 son. Uh would we encourage them to seek 61 00:02:36,800 --> 00:02:41,280 elected office? And um not so long ago, 62 00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:44,000 it wouldn't have I wouldn't have 63 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:46,640 hesitated to say yes. uh those of us who 64 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:49,599 do this, it's a public service. We love 65 00:02:46,640 --> 00:02:51,360 what we do and just the ability to see 66 00:02:49,599 --> 00:02:53,040 um our community getting better because 67 00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:56,239 of some of the work we're able to do 68 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:59,360 together. There's nothing like it. But 69 00:02:56,239 --> 00:03:03,680 uh but there's a butt and in recent 70 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:06,879 years it has become um uh very toxic uh 71 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:09,680 to the point of death threats uh for 72 00:03:06,879 --> 00:03:13,440 members of elected office. And so 73 00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:15,440 Electrospect was born. Um we uh everyone 74 00:03:13,440 --> 00:03:18,239 around the table of my coffee group and 75 00:03:15,440 --> 00:03:20,239 this is trustees all the way up to MPs, 76 00:03:18,239 --> 00:03:21,760 cabinet ministers, we had all 77 00:03:20,239 --> 00:03:23,680 experienced it and it was really kind of 78 00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:26,879 a shocking moment for us to hear that 79 00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:28,720 every single person had a story and uh 80 00:03:26,879 --> 00:03:31,280 and then we got to work. Uh what what 81 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:34,080 could we do about this? And the one 82 00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:36,799 thing that we can always do is lead by 83 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:39,599 example and commit ourselves to 84 00:03:36,799 --> 00:03:42,000 respectful debate and dialogue. And so 85 00:03:39,599 --> 00:03:46,000 we so the pledge, the electrospect 86 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:48,319 pledge was born. Uh we commit to uh 87 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:51,040 being respectful to our colleagues on 88 00:03:48,319 --> 00:03:52,879 council when we disagree. We want to 89 00:03:51,040 --> 00:03:54,879 foster good debate and dialogue about 90 00:03:52,879 --> 00:03:57,519 the issues, but we want to focus on 91 00:03:54,879 --> 00:03:59,519 policy, not people and not personal 92 00:03:57,519 --> 00:04:01,760 attacks. So that's the first part of the 93 00:03:59,519 --> 00:04:04,560 pledge. Uh and in return, we ask the 94 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:08,560 public and our uh and our colleagues to 95 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:11,920 treat us with respect. And since uh we 96 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:16,479 launched the pledge um uh it has gone 97 00:04:11,920 --> 00:04:19,040 across Ontario, across the country uh 98 00:04:16,479 --> 00:04:21,600 major cities including Toronto, Missaga, 99 00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:24,240 Hamilton, uh of course Burlington have 100 00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:27,120 passed this. You would be the first uh 101 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:29,600 city in British Columbia to pass it. Uh 102 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:32,880 we have Flintflon Manitoba who passed 103 00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:35,600 it. uh and a number of uh boards and 104 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:37,919 agencies including chambers of commerce 105 00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:39,840 uh business improvement areas you know 106 00:04:37,919 --> 00:04:41,759 really those public-f facing uh 107 00:04:39,840 --> 00:04:44,880 businesses where they are saying they 108 00:04:41,759 --> 00:04:46,560 also want to uh receive respect from the 109 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:48,960 their customers and the people they 110 00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:52,560 serve. Uh last year our member of 111 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:54,320 parliament Karina Gould um presented the 112 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:56,639 elect respect pledge in the House of 113 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:58,960 Commons. So we do encourage you to reach 114 00:04:56,639 --> 00:05:01,199 out to your MPs, your members of the 115 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:04,160 legislative assembly to see if they will 116 00:05:01,199 --> 00:05:06,560 sign and endorse the pledge. So the 117 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:08,639 momentum is really growing across the 118 00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:11,120 country. And I think there's there's a 119 00:05:08,639 --> 00:05:13,120 good and a and a and a difficult side to 120 00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:15,600 that. The good part is people are saying 121 00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:18,240 we want respectful discourse. The issues 122 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:20,960 are too important. They're too big and 123 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:23,039 and there are legitimate views, 124 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:24,960 different views about them. Uh the 125 00:05:23,039 --> 00:05:26,800 downside is that everyone's got a story 126 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:28,639 and and we really think that that's why 127 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:30,800 this has taken off across the country 128 00:05:28,639 --> 00:05:33,039 that people are saying enough. Uh 129 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:35,600 politics doesn't have to be a blood 130 00:05:33,039 --> 00:05:37,680 sport. It's actually public service. Uh 131 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:41,680 and we want to encourage good people to 132 00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:42,720 run and stay in politics. Uh and uh I 133 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:44,720 want to be able to encourage my 134 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:48,080 daughters and my son uh to choose this 135 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:50,560 as a career and not fear uh for it. Uh 136 00:05:48,080 --> 00:05:52,800 what it is is respectful debate. What it 137 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:55,120 isn't is an attempt to silence different 138 00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:58,320 views. In fact, the opposite is true. 139 00:05:55,120 --> 00:06:00,720 And if there is uh toxic civ uh civil 140 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:03,120 discourse, if you are worried that you 141 00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:05,440 could be threatened with uh with death 142 00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:09,680 in my case, uh I can tell you my story, 143 00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:11,840 but uh it's it's um I've been told not 144 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:14,240 to go to public meetings. My safety 145 00:06:11,840 --> 00:06:16,880 couldn't be guaranteed. Uh that's what 146 00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:19,520 we're trying to say is unacceptable. uh 147 00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:21,520 but legitimate, respectful disagreement 148 00:06:19,520 --> 00:06:23,759 and debate on the issues we face is 149 00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:26,080 absolutely what we're trying to foster 150 00:06:23,759 --> 00:06:28,160 and create a climate of respect. So, 151 00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:29,840 thank you for the opportunity to say a 152 00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:31,840 few words. Happy to answer any 153 00:06:29,840 --> 00:06:33,759 questions. And again, thank you, Mayor 154 00:06:31,840 --> 00:06:35,600 Wells, and and all of the good people 155 00:06:33,759 --> 00:06:37,520 and council members of Courtney for this 156 00:06:35,600 --> 00:06:39,120 opportunity to speak to you this 157 00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:40,639 evening. 158 00:06:39,120 --> 00:06:42,240 » Oh, thank thank you so much. Really 159 00:06:40,639 --> 00:06:45,199 appreciate it. And again, thanks again 160 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:47,440 for for starting this campaign again. Uh 161 00:06:45,199 --> 00:06:49,039 I I think you really highlighted the 162 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:51,280 fact that, you know, this is something 163 00:06:49,039 --> 00:06:54,000 um uh when we look at the betrayal, when 164 00:06:51,280 --> 00:06:55,600 we look at um uh people fearing for 165 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:59,759 their safety, it's definitely something 166 00:06:55,600 --> 00:07:01,919 that has uh uh exacerbated over the last 167 00:06:59,759 --> 00:07:05,099 five or so years that we we I've noticed 168 00:07:01,919 --> 00:07:05,759 it here. Um and uh and it it's 169 00:07:05,099 --> 00:07:08,319 [clears throat] definitely something 170 00:07:05,759 --> 00:07:11,440 that we see happening a lot online, but 171 00:07:08,319 --> 00:07:15,440 then we can see that spilling over um uh 172 00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:17,759 beyond that. And when I see how um this 173 00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:21,919 uh hits differently for my female 174 00:07:17,759 --> 00:07:25,280 colleagues, um one the types of threats 175 00:07:21,919 --> 00:07:28,560 they get are definitely I would say um 176 00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:30,479 levels multiple levels above what what I 177 00:07:28,560 --> 00:07:32,160 receive. Uh and you know some of the 178 00:07:30,479 --> 00:07:35,680 stuff I receive I think is certainly 179 00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:37,599 unacceptable but um uh people shouldn't 180 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:39,440 have to fear for their safety, for their 181 00:07:37,599 --> 00:07:41,520 lives or or for their family members. 182 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:43,680 And and that's just something that uh 183 00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:46,800 Unfortunately, uh, as as you mentioned, 184 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:48,960 is is some people you we sometimes refer 185 00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:50,479 to them as keyboard warriors, but, uh, 186 00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:52,319 especially online, they're they're 187 00:07:50,479 --> 00:07:55,919 feeling that they have, uh, sort of a 188 00:07:52,319 --> 00:07:57,680 cart blanch to, uh, to attack and to try 189 00:07:55,919 --> 00:07:59,280 to intimidate and instill fear in 190 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:01,599 people, which is which is simply 191 00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:03,680 bullying and and and not not acceptable. 192 00:08:01,599 --> 00:08:05,199 So, u, I really do appreciate it. Um, 193 00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:07,840 I'll look to my council members if 194 00:08:05,199 --> 00:08:09,840 anybody had any uh, comments uh, or 195 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:12,319 questions beyond that. I don't see 196 00:08:09,840 --> 00:08:14,479 anything. Um, I really appreciate you 197 00:08:12,319 --> 00:08:16,160 taking the time today uh to do this. I 198 00:08:14,479 --> 00:08:18,080 know we had a member of the public who 199 00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:21,120 thought you might be flying here today. 200 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:22,800 Uh, this is definitely a lot more uh uh 201 00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:24,400 useful. We do have a counselor on a 202 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:27,440 train going in the opposite direction 203 00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:29,919 towards you, I think. Uh, but uh really 204 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:32,240 glad you were able to to pop in today. 205 00:08:29,919 --> 00:08:34,719 Um, and again, a huge thank you for 206 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:37,279 starting this uh this campaign and 207 00:08:34,719 --> 00:08:39,440 really hope that uh we continue to to 208 00:08:37,279 --> 00:08:42,719 move things forward. I know there's 209 00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:45,519 quite a few BC uh politicians now who 210 00:08:42,719 --> 00:08:47,760 have signed on to this and uh and I 211 00:08:45,519 --> 00:08:51,200 would expect that to continue. Our our 212 00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:53,920 local um association ABICC has asked me 213 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:56,720 to sort of um uh provide some 214 00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:58,640 information when we have our um uh 215 00:08:56,720 --> 00:09:00,640 conference coming up here uh in in the 216 00:08:58,640 --> 00:09:03,839 near future. So there's definitely a lot 217 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:06,560 of interest um uh and uh again, thank 218 00:09:03,839 --> 00:09:08,399 you so much. And with that, I'll let you 219 00:09:06,560 --> 00:09:11,760 go back to your regularly scheduled 220 00:09:08,399 --> 00:09:13,200 program and uh appreciate again all your 221 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:15,760 work on this. 222 00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:19,839 » Thank you so much. 223 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:22,959 » All right. Um with that, we'll move into 224 00:09:19,839 --> 00:09:25,040 uh internal reports and correspondence. 225 00:09:22,959 --> 00:09:28,320 And first is a resident survey, your 226 00:09:25,040 --> 00:09:30,880 Courtney, your voice. And I'll pass it 227 00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:34,120 over to 228 00:09:30,880 --> 00:09:34,120 Miss Okconor. 229 00:09:34,399 --> 00:09:39,120 Uh, thank you very much, council. So, 230 00:09:37,279 --> 00:09:41,440 um, I'm very excited to present this 231 00:09:39,120 --> 00:09:43,200 year's findings of the 2025 resident 232 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:45,440 satisfaction survey, your Courtney, your 233 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:47,040 voice. This year marks a significant 234 00:09:45,440 --> 00:09:48,880 step in our commitment to community 235 00:09:47,040 --> 00:09:50,640 engagement. Building on the feedback 236 00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:53,040 gathered from our previous surveys to 237 00:09:50,640 --> 00:09:55,600 form a what will be a very valuable 238 00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:57,519 5-year benchmark data set. As in past 239 00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:59,200 durations, the survey serves as a 240 00:09:57,519 --> 00:10:01,200 crucial platform for residents to 241 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:03,519 express their opinions and influence 242 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:05,680 city policies and services. By utilizing 243 00:10:03,519 --> 00:10:07,279 evidence-based decision-making, we can 244 00:10:05,680 --> 00:10:09,360 meaningfully evaluate our service 245 00:10:07,279 --> 00:10:11,839 delivery and pinpoint areas that need 246 00:10:09,360 --> 00:10:14,000 improvement. Notably, the city selected 247 00:10:11,839 --> 00:10:15,760 Prairie Research Associates this year to 248 00:10:14,000 --> 00:10:18,800 lead the survey. So, bit of a different 249 00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:20,800 face online. uh implementing innovative 250 00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:22,880 methodologies that diminish bias and 251 00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:24,880 enhance data quality, particularly by 252 00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:26,720 capturing a more representative sample 253 00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:28,720 of our diverse community, including 254 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:31,200 younger residents who are previously who 255 00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:33,600 previously had less visibility. Among 256 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:36,399 the meth methodological updates for the 257 00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:37,760 2025 survey was a significant change in 258 00:10:36,399 --> 00:10:39,600 the way we approach our municipal 259 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:41,120 comparators. In the past, our 260 00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:43,120 comparisons involved municipalities 261 00:10:41,120 --> 00:10:46,320 whose populations range broadly from 262 00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:48,000 10,000 to 150,000 residents, which often 263 00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:50,320 skewed the accuracy of our benchmarks 264 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:52,079 for Courtney. This year, we refined our 265 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:53,600 selection criteria to focus on 266 00:10:52,079 --> 00:10:55,920 municipalities that are more similar in 267 00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:57,440 size and characteristics to Courtney, 268 00:10:55,920 --> 00:11:00,079 such as Campbell River, Port Moody, 269 00:10:57,440 --> 00:11:02,240 Colonus, Smitch, and Swamish and 270 00:11:00,079 --> 00:11:03,760 mission. This targeted approach allows 271 00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:05,360 for a more relevant context in 272 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:07,519 evaluating Courtney's performance and 273 00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:09,120 satisfaction levels, ultimately leading 274 00:11:07,519 --> 00:11:11,440 to more effective planning and resource 275 00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:12,880 allocation. Through open and transparent 276 00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,480 communication, our goal is to ensure 277 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:16,079 that the voices of Courtney residents 278 00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:17,680 are heard and that their insights 279 00:11:16,079 --> 00:11:19,680 directly influence our collective 280 00:11:17,680 --> 00:11:22,000 future. With that in mind, I'm very 281 00:11:19,680 --> 00:11:24,079 pleased to hand things over uh to well 282 00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:25,360 for the presentation component to Derek 283 00:11:24,079 --> 00:11:27,760 Berg, who is the senior marketing 284 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:29,200 research manager for P, who will walk us 285 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:31,519 through the detailed findings of the 286 00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:33,760 2025 survey and share his insights and 287 00:11:31,519 --> 00:11:36,000 implications for our community. Council, 288 00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:38,320 please note the entirety of the report 289 00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:39,839 is on uh the presentation deck in the 290 00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:41,360 event you want to go back to specific 291 00:11:39,839 --> 00:11:43,120 slides, but Derek will likely be 292 00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:45,200 focusing on certain slides more than 293 00:11:43,120 --> 00:11:47,200 others. Um, so if you see us moving 294 00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:48,640 through some quickly, it's really to 295 00:11:47,200 --> 00:11:50,480 allow us to go back in the event you 296 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:52,480 wanted to have a specific discussion 297 00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:54,240 about some slides we weren't focusing on 298 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:57,120 for this evening. So with that, I'll 299 00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:59,120 pass it over to Derek. 300 00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:01,600 » Perfect. Thank you very much for that 301 00:11:59,120 --> 00:12:04,320 introduction. Uh, yes, as Kate said, I 302 00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:06,000 am Derek Berg. I'm a senior uh market 303 00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:10,240 research manager at Prairie Research 304 00:12:06,000 --> 00:12:11,920 Associates and uh very happy to have uh 305 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:14,959 uh conducted this work for the city of 306 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:18,480 Courtney um this year and happy to uh go 307 00:12:14,959 --> 00:12:20,160 into some details about the findings. Uh 308 00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:23,279 so we'll start off I'll just do a quick 309 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:26,560 note on just the the methodology um if 310 00:12:23,279 --> 00:12:29,360 we go a couple slides forward here. Um 311 00:12:26,560 --> 00:12:31,519 so we did a similar methodology um of 312 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:34,399 what's been done in the past. We did a 313 00:12:31,519 --> 00:12:36,079 random digit dialing telephone survey of 314 00:12:34,399 --> 00:12:38,720 residents of the city of Courtney. 315 00:12:36,079 --> 00:12:41,120 Everyone um had to be at least 18 or 316 00:12:38,720 --> 00:12:43,519 older to uh participate. 317 00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:46,560 Um but this is basically the most um 318 00:12:43,519 --> 00:12:48,800 statistically valid way of uh getting 319 00:12:46,560 --> 00:12:51,680 respondents to uh complete this type of 320 00:12:48,800 --> 00:12:54,399 survey. So it's completely random uh 321 00:12:51,680 --> 00:12:56,639 with 300 residents. Um but what we did 322 00:12:54,399 --> 00:12:58,639 is implemented quotas to make sure that 323 00:12:56,639 --> 00:13:02,720 we were um reaching the appropriate 324 00:12:58,639 --> 00:13:05,600 groups in terms of age and uh gender and 325 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:07,279 household income. Uh to make sure that 326 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:10,720 uh this population that we were serving 327 00:13:07,279 --> 00:13:13,200 is uh statistically representative of 328 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:15,680 the the city as a whole. And where there 329 00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:18,079 were some discrepancies uh we waited the 330 00:13:15,680 --> 00:13:21,120 data to make sure that um once again 331 00:13:18,079 --> 00:13:23,680 that data is um statistically valid and 332 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:27,839 uh reliable. 333 00:13:23,680 --> 00:13:30,800 So I just skip through a few slides here 334 00:13:27,839 --> 00:13:33,440 to get to the section on uh quality of 335 00:13:30,800 --> 00:13:36,320 life. 336 00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:38,720 Uh so this first is uh top of- mind 337 00:13:36,320 --> 00:13:40,800 issues. So we started by asking um 338 00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:42,480 residents of the city of Courtney what 339 00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:45,600 they thought is the most important issue 340 00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:47,839 facing their community today. um as it 341 00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:50,560 has been in past years. We we looked at 342 00:13:47,839 --> 00:13:52,959 um how to compare this to what we saw in 343 00:13:50,560 --> 00:13:56,079 uh previous years and homelessness 344 00:13:52,959 --> 00:13:58,560 continues to be kind of the key the 345 00:13:56,079 --> 00:14:02,560 first top of mind issue that um that 346 00:13:58,560 --> 00:14:04,480 comes to residents minds. Um that's 347 00:14:02,560 --> 00:14:06,320 certainly not unique to the city of 348 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:09,440 Courtney. um as it's shown here, it's 349 00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:11,839 also um when we looked at other um 350 00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:13,360 resident surveys in comparable m 351 00:14:11,839 --> 00:14:15,760 municipalities 352 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:19,120 um cities like Campbell River, Colona, 353 00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:22,959 Cranbook, and Mission, um homelessness 354 00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:25,120 was kind of the the the key uh top of- 355 00:14:22,959 --> 00:14:28,560 mind issue that uh that came up the most 356 00:14:25,120 --> 00:14:30,320 often. Um so for city of Courtney 357 00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:32,560 residents, these concerns witho 358 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:34,800 homelessness or at least it being the 359 00:14:32,560 --> 00:14:38,000 top of- mind issue um with people tends 360 00:14:34,800 --> 00:14:40,800 to increase with age. Um and although 361 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:43,600 not quite in that statistically uh 362 00:14:40,800 --> 00:14:46,880 significant realm, but um also prevalent 363 00:14:43,600 --> 00:14:49,839 uh among women more so than men. Um this 364 00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:52,880 to me it's likely due to a personal 365 00:14:49,839 --> 00:14:55,120 safety um issue. you have the older 366 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:57,279 population or women feeling that, you 367 00:14:55,120 --> 00:15:01,279 know, maybe it's they're uh it's more 368 00:14:57,279 --> 00:15:03,760 they're more vulnerable um seeing um you 369 00:15:01,279 --> 00:15:07,199 know, the homeless population 370 00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:10,880 um prominent. So um that's kind of our 371 00:15:07,199 --> 00:15:13,600 what I uh interpret from the data here. 372 00:15:10,880 --> 00:15:15,760 Um yeah, there you know several other 373 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:18,959 issues that like um the lack of 374 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:21,199 affordable housing or uh mental health 375 00:15:18,959 --> 00:15:22,800 issues, traffic, road congestion are 376 00:15:21,199 --> 00:15:24,800 some of the more top of- mind issues, 377 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:29,760 but it it's definitely homelessness that 378 00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:32,639 is the the key uh top of mind um thing 379 00:15:29,760 --> 00:15:36,480 for uh city of Courtney residents. 380 00:15:32,639 --> 00:15:39,279 So moving on to quality of life. Um so 381 00:15:36,480 --> 00:15:41,360 on a four-point scale here from uh very 382 00:15:39,279 --> 00:15:42,959 good to very poor residents were asked 383 00:15:41,360 --> 00:15:45,360 to rate you know how they felt the 384 00:15:42,959 --> 00:15:48,560 quality of life in city of Courtney is 385 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:51,120 um we generally this is fairly similar 386 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:53,600 when we look at overall um satisfaction 387 00:15:51,120 --> 00:15:55,199 and those saying very good or good um 388 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:57,519 with quality of life when we compare it 389 00:15:55,199 --> 00:15:59,519 to last year although you can see there 390 00:15:57,519 --> 00:16:03,600 is has been a little bit of a drop each 391 00:15:59,519 --> 00:16:04,959 year over the past couple years. Um, one 392 00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:09,440 thing that I thought is interesting to 393 00:16:04,959 --> 00:16:11,680 note here is that it's although the top 394 00:16:09,440 --> 00:16:14,959 two score kind of goes a little bit 395 00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:17,600 down, um, you'll see that the those in 396 00:16:14,959 --> 00:16:20,399 the very good side or then those kind of 397 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:22,320 on the poor side. Um, it seems like 398 00:16:20,399 --> 00:16:24,399 people tend to skew more to the extreme 399 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:26,720 in this and you have less of those that 400 00:16:24,399 --> 00:16:30,320 are kind of just in the middle with 401 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:33,440 that. Um but 402 00:16:30,320 --> 00:16:35,680 yeah, with that said, I I do think it's 403 00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:38,240 somewhat of a a positive to see that you 404 00:16:35,680 --> 00:16:40,079 still have um certainly an increase over 405 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:41,600 last year and those that feel like the 406 00:16:40,079 --> 00:16:45,519 quality of life in City of Courtney is 407 00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:48,079 very good. Um those that are more likely 408 00:16:45,519 --> 00:16:52,399 to to have those positive perceptions 409 00:16:48,079 --> 00:16:54,959 are um those who are 65 and older. And 410 00:16:52,399 --> 00:16:57,839 it's um it's those in the the mid age 411 00:16:54,959 --> 00:17:03,000 range, 30 to 44 years old, that um are 412 00:16:57,839 --> 00:17:03,000 least likely to to rate um positively. 413 00:17:04,799 --> 00:17:11,039 And uh as um Kate had mentioned, we kind 414 00:17:07,839 --> 00:17:14,240 of took a look at some um comparable m 415 00:17:11,039 --> 00:17:16,880 municipalities to kind of give some key 416 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:19,760 um benchmark comparisons. And in terms 417 00:17:16,880 --> 00:17:21,839 of quality of life, um when we look at 418 00:17:19,760 --> 00:17:25,760 the the the good or very good, so the 419 00:17:21,839 --> 00:17:27,760 top two rating, Courtney falls um kind 420 00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:30,000 of pretty much in the in the middle of, 421 00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:34,559 you know, where we um were able to find 422 00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:37,600 data on comparable um cities. So, 423 00:17:34,559 --> 00:17:40,480 not uh not on the worst end and not uh 424 00:17:37,600 --> 00:17:42,160 not really on the on the on the super 425 00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:44,240 high high end, but yeah, just kind of 426 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:48,000 there um in the middle to kind of give 427 00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:50,080 you some um benchmark context for that. 428 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:54,720 When we look at changes in quality of 429 00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:58,000 life over time, um it's not this isn't a 430 00:17:54,720 --> 00:17:59,760 uh it's hard to give a direct comparison 431 00:17:58,000 --> 00:18:02,960 um to the previous years simply because 432 00:17:59,760 --> 00:18:04,960 we changed this question to um ask just 433 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:08,160 about changes over the past year rather 434 00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:09,840 than changes over the past 3 years. Um 435 00:18:08,160 --> 00:18:12,480 so for that reason it's not really 436 00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:14,000 surprising to me that we have um 437 00:18:12,480 --> 00:18:16,480 basically about half of people staying 438 00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:19,200 that saying that the they feel like the 439 00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:22,320 quality of life has stayed the same. Um 440 00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:23,679 but certainly a lot less that are saying 441 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:26,640 you know quality of life has become 442 00:18:23,679 --> 00:18:28,240 worse over the past year and a bit 443 00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:30,960 similar even a little bit higher with 444 00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:34,960 that 8% saying that um the quality of 445 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:37,760 life has um has gotten better. 446 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:40,320 So to me that's a bit of a a positive 447 00:18:37,760 --> 00:18:42,640 move in the positive direction. 448 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:44,559 Um and then when we look at the net 449 00:18:42,640 --> 00:18:47,840 promoter score this is definitely where 450 00:18:44,559 --> 00:18:51,760 we see some some positive movement. um 451 00:18:47,840 --> 00:18:55,760 in 23 and 24 we saw similar net promoter 452 00:18:51,760 --> 00:18:57,760 scores of um of -1617 453 00:18:55,760 --> 00:19:00,000 whereas although we're still in the the 454 00:18:57,760 --> 00:19:04,799 negative um moving in the positive 455 00:19:00,000 --> 00:19:06,240 direction up to um -4 and just uh to 456 00:19:04,799 --> 00:19:09,280 clarify for those don't that don't know 457 00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:13,760 the net promoter score is um essentially 458 00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:16,320 taking the calculation of those who rate 459 00:19:13,760 --> 00:19:17,760 their uh recommendation of city of 460 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:21,200 Courtney has a place to live on a scale 461 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:24,320 of 0 to 10. You take those um promoters, 462 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:26,720 so those saying 9 or 10, and uh that is 463 00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:29,120 subtracted from the detractors, so those 464 00:19:26,720 --> 00:19:32,400 rating anywhere from 0 to six. So that's 465 00:19:29,120 --> 00:19:35,919 what gives you that um that so it's a 466 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:38,720 32% minus 36% which gives you that uh 467 00:19:35,919 --> 00:19:42,080 that negative4. Um, one thing that I'll 468 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:45,280 note is, uh, we changed this to a true 469 00:19:42,080 --> 00:19:48,000 net promoter score, um, metric. Uh, in 470 00:19:45,280 --> 00:19:50,480 the past, um, this was only rated on a 1 471 00:19:48,000 --> 00:19:52,080 to 10 scale, although we moved this to 472 00:19:50,480 --> 00:19:55,440 what is considered the industry 473 00:19:52,080 --> 00:19:58,640 standard, which is a 0 to 10 scale. Um, 474 00:19:55,440 --> 00:20:00,799 so you will see obviously there are 11% 475 00:19:58,640 --> 00:20:02,480 here who said zero where there hadn't 476 00:20:00,799 --> 00:20:05,120 been any in the previous years because 477 00:20:02,480 --> 00:20:07,760 that wasn't an option. But despite 478 00:20:05,120 --> 00:20:10,720 having that one extra option for people 479 00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:12,720 to rate um their recommendation on the 480 00:20:10,720 --> 00:20:15,440 lower end, we're actually seeing an 481 00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:18,480 increase in um in a high number of 482 00:20:15,440 --> 00:20:22,000 promoters. You jumped up from uh from 483 00:20:18,480 --> 00:20:23,440 16% up to 25% in those that um rate 484 00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:27,039 coordinates at 10 out of 10 for 485 00:20:23,440 --> 00:20:29,679 likelihood to recommend. Um [snorts] 486 00:20:27,039 --> 00:20:32,080 and uh yeah, just one one note about 487 00:20:29,679 --> 00:20:34,400 that is again um the older population 488 00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:38,000 and also home ownership which is kind of 489 00:20:34,400 --> 00:20:41,039 tied to um to to age as well. They had 490 00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:43,679 the uh they were more likely to rate um 491 00:20:41,039 --> 00:20:46,240 City of Courtney as a higher uh more 492 00:20:43,679 --> 00:20:49,099 likely to rate it higher in terms of um 493 00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:49,840 how they would recommend it. 494 00:20:49,099 --> 00:20:52,799 » [snorts] 495 00:20:49,840 --> 00:20:56,320 » Um, and then so this is just looking at 496 00:20:52,799 --> 00:20:59,280 um for those that did not give a um a 497 00:20:56,320 --> 00:21:01,280 positive rating to um recommending the 498 00:20:59,280 --> 00:21:04,559 city of Courtney as a place to live. 499 00:21:01,280 --> 00:21:07,760 These are reasons why. Um a lot of these 500 00:21:04,559 --> 00:21:09,120 are fairly similar to we we tried to 501 00:21:07,760 --> 00:21:10,400 compare to last year as much as 502 00:21:09,120 --> 00:21:13,679 possible. So some of these are fairly 503 00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:16,559 similar. um you'll see a bit uh of an 504 00:21:13,679 --> 00:21:18,400 increase in high cost of living, which 505 00:21:16,559 --> 00:21:20,720 again it makes sense and that's not 506 00:21:18,400 --> 00:21:23,679 exclusive to Courtney. That's that's um 507 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:26,240 being experienced everywhere. Um and 508 00:21:23,679 --> 00:21:27,760 then one thing is that what we didn't 509 00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:30,000 see from the data last year is people 510 00:21:27,760 --> 00:21:33,440 saying um that the city is too crowded. 511 00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:36,880 Um that's 19% of people this year said 512 00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:38,320 that. So, I don't know if um the the 513 00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:40,480 research vendor that did this last year 514 00:21:38,320 --> 00:21:43,039 if if maybe that wasn't a a theme that 515 00:21:40,480 --> 00:21:45,200 came up uh enough for them to to put it 516 00:21:43,039 --> 00:21:47,039 into its own code, but um it was 517 00:21:45,200 --> 00:21:48,960 certainly something that um that we saw 518 00:21:47,039 --> 00:21:52,000 in the data um this year and and 519 00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:55,039 certainly it's it's tied with um the uh 520 00:21:52,000 --> 00:21:57,039 the highest proportion for um for 521 00:21:55,039 --> 00:22:00,039 reasons not to recommend uh the city of 522 00:21:57,039 --> 00:22:00,039 Courtney. 523 00:22:00,320 --> 00:22:08,880 Okay. So, uh now moving on to uh 524 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:11,919 satisfaction with city services. Um 525 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:14,240 so when we look at the uh top two box 526 00:22:11,919 --> 00:22:16,640 here, we see 62% are either very 527 00:22:14,240 --> 00:22:20,080 satisfied or somewhat satisfied um 528 00:22:16,640 --> 00:22:22,960 overall with the city services. Um but 529 00:22:20,080 --> 00:22:24,720 to me this is also moving in a more 530 00:22:22,960 --> 00:22:27,760 positive direction just because you have 531 00:22:24,720 --> 00:22:30,080 that increase of those who are um or are 532 00:22:27,760 --> 00:22:32,240 saying they're very satisfied. That two 533 00:22:30,080 --> 00:22:36,640 top two box like a difference of 4% 534 00:22:32,240 --> 00:22:39,039 isn't isn't a huge increase. Um so to 535 00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:41,679 see that that very satisfied number jump 536 00:22:39,039 --> 00:22:44,320 up a bit more I think is um is more 537 00:22:41,679 --> 00:22:46,159 telling. And then you have a a bit more 538 00:22:44,320 --> 00:22:48,000 it's it's more so with the people who 539 00:22:46,159 --> 00:22:51,360 are moving out of the somewhat satisfied 540 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:54,080 box into kind of that that middle area. 541 00:22:51,360 --> 00:22:56,240 So um you're you're certainly not seeing 542 00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:59,720 more negative here. Um but you are 543 00:22:56,240 --> 00:22:59,720 seeing more positive. 544 00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:06,559 Um and then so the next slide here just 545 00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:09,919 talks uh shows overall satisfaction with 546 00:23:06,559 --> 00:23:13,120 city services um with what we could find 547 00:23:09,919 --> 00:23:14,799 um online with um with other comparable 548 00:23:13,120 --> 00:23:18,880 m municipalities. 549 00:23:14,799 --> 00:23:20,720 Um so this does show that although the 550 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:23,919 the previous slide showed that there 551 00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:26,640 were positive sentiments um this might 552 00:23:23,919 --> 00:23:29,120 show that city of Courtney ranks more 553 00:23:26,640 --> 00:23:32,480 towards the bottom of this. However, um 554 00:23:29,120 --> 00:23:34,320 the caveat here is that typically when 555 00:23:32,480 --> 00:23:35,679 other m municipalities, actually all 556 00:23:34,320 --> 00:23:38,640 four of those that are above city of 557 00:23:35,679 --> 00:23:40,960 Courtney here, um they used a fivepoint 558 00:23:38,640 --> 00:23:45,840 scale rather or sorry, a four-point 559 00:23:40,960 --> 00:23:48,000 scale um to rate um satisfaction versus 560 00:23:45,840 --> 00:23:50,640 what we use as a as a fivepoint scale. 561 00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:52,559 So, um, those top four, they didn't have 562 00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:55,039 the option to kind of go in the in the 563 00:23:52,559 --> 00:23:56,640 middle, forcing them to go either one 564 00:23:55,039 --> 00:24:00,159 direction or or the other in terms of 565 00:23:56,640 --> 00:24:02,799 positive or negative. Um, I would say if 566 00:24:00,159 --> 00:24:05,760 if this if the surveys were be to run 567 00:24:02,799 --> 00:24:07,360 exactly the same, you would tend to have 568 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:10,080 um a lot of those people who are in the 569 00:24:07,360 --> 00:24:12,240 positive category. Um so typically those 570 00:24:10,080 --> 00:24:14,480 who are somewhat satisfied kind of move 571 00:24:12,240 --> 00:24:17,760 into that mid category where they're in 572 00:24:14,480 --> 00:24:20,720 between um satisfied and dissatisfied. 573 00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:22,159 So um again although this this does show 574 00:24:20,720 --> 00:24:25,600 City of Courtney is more towards the 575 00:24:22,159 --> 00:24:28,080 bottom. Um to me I I think this shows 576 00:24:25,600 --> 00:24:29,919 more that they're it's kind of more in 577 00:24:28,080 --> 00:24:31,840 the middle. Um certainly with Mission 578 00:24:29,919 --> 00:24:34,000 with that 69% you would see that drop 579 00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:36,400 down. Um but the other top three there I 580 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:38,799 think would would drop down considerably 581 00:24:36,400 --> 00:24:41,279 um with the change in scale and uh and 582 00:24:38,799 --> 00:24:44,400 yeah you'd have city of Courtney ranking 583 00:24:41,279 --> 00:24:46,559 um I would say similar to um what we can 584 00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:49,559 see in other uh comparable 585 00:24:46,559 --> 00:24:49,559 municipalities. 586 00:24:50,480 --> 00:24:55,520 Okay. And so this is just a quick 587 00:24:52,799 --> 00:24:59,440 snapshot of individual um city services 588 00:24:55,520 --> 00:25:02,000 that we asked about. Um 589 00:24:59,440 --> 00:25:04,480 what's was I guess was interesting to me 590 00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:07,279 is that although the overall 591 00:25:04,480 --> 00:25:09,600 satisfaction we asked when we um you 592 00:25:07,279 --> 00:25:11,279 know prefaced with people rating their 593 00:25:09,600 --> 00:25:13,840 just overall satisfaction before getting 594 00:25:11,279 --> 00:25:18,720 into uh kind of the details here people 595 00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:21,279 were generally um positive. Yet here um 596 00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:23,039 we don't really see any positive 597 00:25:21,279 --> 00:25:25,760 movement compared to last year other 598 00:25:23,039 --> 00:25:29,600 than satisfaction with um parks, green 599 00:25:25,760 --> 00:25:32,000 spaces, and multi-use trails. Um others 600 00:25:29,600 --> 00:25:36,159 other areas are more either kind of just 601 00:25:32,000 --> 00:25:39,120 in line with um with last year or saw a 602 00:25:36,159 --> 00:25:41,279 little bit of a drop. Um and then to me 603 00:25:39,120 --> 00:25:44,159 I think the biggest drop that we see 604 00:25:41,279 --> 00:25:47,679 here is is satisfaction with the 605 00:25:44,159 --> 00:25:53,279 availability of online services. Um to 606 00:25:47,679 --> 00:25:55,039 me this is um is likely due to I mean 607 00:25:53,279 --> 00:25:57,440 we're 608 00:25:55,039 --> 00:26:01,679 uh ever evolving technological world now 609 00:25:57,440 --> 00:26:06,000 and people see how fastpace and changing 610 00:26:01,679 --> 00:26:09,600 um technology is and I think people just 611 00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:12,240 expect more from um the availability of 612 00:26:09,600 --> 00:26:14,000 online services and being able to access 613 00:26:12,240 --> 00:26:16,799 more and to be able to do more with 614 00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:18,320 online services. So to me um just in 615 00:26:16,799 --> 00:26:22,080 terms of that being the biggest drop 616 00:26:18,320 --> 00:26:25,279 that would be my um my my guess as to 617 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:28,559 why that is. And I think um we also saw 618 00:26:25,279 --> 00:26:32,480 uh with that we saw that um the younger 619 00:26:28,559 --> 00:26:35,760 uh age population were uh less satisfied 620 00:26:32,480 --> 00:26:38,760 with um that availability of online um 621 00:26:35,760 --> 00:26:38,760 services. 622 00:26:39,039 --> 00:26:45,360 Okay. And then so now just looking at um 623 00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:47,600 a key driver analysis of um overall city 624 00:26:45,360 --> 00:26:50,960 services. Um so what this does we ran a 625 00:26:47,600 --> 00:26:55,440 regression model to um basically predict 626 00:26:50,960 --> 00:26:57,919 what um are most likely in terms of 627 00:26:55,440 --> 00:27:00,480 those individual city services what is 628 00:26:57,919 --> 00:27:03,679 most likely to predict 629 00:27:00,480 --> 00:27:06,720 um the positive overall satisfaction 630 00:27:03,679 --> 00:27:09,360 with city services as a whole. Um so 631 00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:11,840 you'll see that uh land use and 632 00:27:09,360 --> 00:27:14,000 community planning um is actually the 633 00:27:11,840 --> 00:27:16,000 biggest predictor of overall 634 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:18,559 satisfaction 635 00:27:16,000 --> 00:27:21,600 um followed by uh park screen spaces and 636 00:27:18,559 --> 00:27:23,039 multi-use trails. Um so we know that you 637 00:27:21,600 --> 00:27:25,360 know park screen spaces, multi-use 638 00:27:23,039 --> 00:27:27,039 trails saw a bit of a a higher 639 00:27:25,360 --> 00:27:28,720 satisfaction this year than last year. 640 00:27:27,039 --> 00:27:31,600 That was ranked second overall in terms 641 00:27:28,720 --> 00:27:34,320 of city services. So that's a good sign 642 00:27:31,600 --> 00:27:36,320 um in in that regard. And then land use 643 00:27:34,320 --> 00:27:39,360 and community planning. To us, this 644 00:27:36,320 --> 00:27:40,960 tells us that this is kind of um you 645 00:27:39,360 --> 00:27:43,120 know, if you are looking to hopefully 646 00:27:40,960 --> 00:27:44,480 have people more satisfied with the 647 00:27:43,120 --> 00:27:46,480 service they received from the city, 648 00:27:44,480 --> 00:27:50,400 this is kind of one of the ones to focus 649 00:27:46,480 --> 00:27:53,039 on. Um I I I can't really say for sure 650 00:27:50,400 --> 00:27:55,760 if it's, you know, is it um you know, 651 00:27:53,039 --> 00:27:57,360 how people agree with with um you know, 652 00:27:55,760 --> 00:27:59,919 the community planning and the use of 653 00:27:57,360 --> 00:28:01,760 land or is it that they don't 654 00:27:59,919 --> 00:28:03,279 necessarily have um the information 655 00:28:01,760 --> 00:28:06,399 available to them to know what's going 656 00:28:03,279 --> 00:28:10,080 on. But um you know certainly this is an 657 00:28:06,399 --> 00:28:11,840 aspect that um could be explored um and 658 00:28:10,080 --> 00:28:14,159 certainly just by the evidence we have 659 00:28:11,840 --> 00:28:16,799 here shows that um it is a very big 660 00:28:14,159 --> 00:28:19,120 predictor for um how satisfied people 661 00:28:16,799 --> 00:28:22,120 are with the overall services they 662 00:28:19,120 --> 00:28:22,120 receive. 663 00:28:22,480 --> 00:28:31,399 So now looking over to um experience and 664 00:28:27,039 --> 00:28:31,399 satisfaction with city staff. 665 00:28:32,159 --> 00:28:38,480 So, uh just under uh half residents, 45% 666 00:28:37,120 --> 00:28:40,720 said that they've personally been in 667 00:28:38,480 --> 00:28:43,679 contact with the city um in the past 668 00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:46,159 year in some capacity. Um a little bit 669 00:28:43,679 --> 00:28:48,720 higher than what uh has been seen in 670 00:28:46,159 --> 00:28:51,360 previous years, but overall um fairly 671 00:28:48,720 --> 00:28:53,919 similar. Um it's those in though in the 672 00:28:51,360 --> 00:28:56,480 kind of mid age range, the uh anywhere 673 00:28:53,919 --> 00:28:58,399 from 30 to 64 years old. Those are the 674 00:28:56,480 --> 00:29:00,000 the residents that are more likely to 675 00:28:58,399 --> 00:29:04,159 have contacted the city in the past 676 00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:08,520 year. those um under 30 or over 65 less 677 00:29:04,159 --> 00:29:08,520 likely to have done so. 678 00:29:10,159 --> 00:29:15,520 » Um and so uh those who did have 679 00:29:13,679 --> 00:29:17,600 experience with contacting the city in 680 00:29:15,520 --> 00:29:21,600 the past year were asked about their 681 00:29:17,600 --> 00:29:25,919 overall experience um in in dealing with 682 00:29:21,600 --> 00:29:29,279 um city staff. Uh again we see fairly 683 00:29:25,919 --> 00:29:31,200 positive uh movement here. We've in 684 00:29:29,279 --> 00:29:34,000 terms of last year we see movement in 685 00:29:31,200 --> 00:29:36,559 both the um top two very satisfied 686 00:29:34,000 --> 00:29:39,200 somewhat satisfied group and then uh 687 00:29:36,559 --> 00:29:42,720 quite a big jump in um those who say 688 00:29:39,200 --> 00:29:46,360 they are very satisfied um overall with 689 00:29:42,720 --> 00:29:46,360 with city staff. 690 00:29:47,679 --> 00:29:52,880 Uh looking at the individual um aspects 691 00:29:51,039 --> 00:29:54,399 we asked about with dealing with city 692 00:29:52,880 --> 00:29:59,279 staff. 693 00:29:54,399 --> 00:30:01,840 Um quite a few um positive jumps here. 694 00:29:59,279 --> 00:30:04,080 Um but the I think the the thing that 695 00:30:01,840 --> 00:30:06,559 pops out to me are kind of the the two 696 00:30:04,080 --> 00:30:10,240 bottom ones here where we see um so 697 00:30:06,559 --> 00:30:12,159 there was a drop in um satisfaction with 698 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:13,679 being able to easily find the right 699 00:30:12,159 --> 00:30:16,559 staff to deal with their their 700 00:30:13,679 --> 00:30:21,360 questionnaire problem. that dropped from 701 00:30:16,559 --> 00:30:23,200 uh 77% satisfied to 69% this year. Um 702 00:30:21,360 --> 00:30:26,399 and then conversely, we saw a pretty big 703 00:30:23,200 --> 00:30:28,080 jump in um in satisfaction with staff 704 00:30:26,399 --> 00:30:31,919 going the extra mile to help them. So 705 00:30:28,080 --> 00:30:35,120 that's from uh 58% last year up to 70% 706 00:30:31,919 --> 00:30:37,360 this year. Um other aspects kind of 707 00:30:35,120 --> 00:30:39,360 fairly in line with uh with what we saw 708 00:30:37,360 --> 00:30:42,399 last year. So um those are kind of the 709 00:30:39,360 --> 00:30:45,679 big uh the big changes um that we saw 710 00:30:42,399 --> 00:30:49,120 last year. And then as we move forward 711 00:30:45,679 --> 00:30:52,399 uh we'll also see a key driver analysis 712 00:30:49,120 --> 00:30:54,480 that uh we conducted um on this as well. 713 00:30:52,399 --> 00:30:57,039 So same idea as the the one before. This 714 00:30:54,480 --> 00:30:58,640 is kind of the to predict um what 715 00:30:57,039 --> 00:31:01,120 aspects 716 00:30:58,640 --> 00:31:04,080 um are most likely to impact people's 717 00:31:01,120 --> 00:31:07,120 overall satisfaction with city staff. 718 00:31:04,080 --> 00:31:09,039 Um so this is an interesting one. I 719 00:31:07,120 --> 00:31:13,520 unfortunately I don't necessarily know 720 00:31:09,039 --> 00:31:15,200 how you um would define uh this top one 721 00:31:13,520 --> 00:31:17,919 where it's you know staff going the 722 00:31:15,200 --> 00:31:22,399 extra mile to help them. Um but this is 723 00:31:17,919 --> 00:31:25,039 certainly a um a very strong predictor 724 00:31:22,399 --> 00:31:29,360 of what uh satisfaction overall with 725 00:31:25,039 --> 00:31:31,679 staff is. Um, I think it's um it's one 726 00:31:29,360 --> 00:31:34,480 of those tricky ones where it's it's 727 00:31:31,679 --> 00:31:37,840 hard to measure exactly what going the 728 00:31:34,480 --> 00:31:40,640 extra mile means to to people who who do 729 00:31:37,840 --> 00:31:43,120 get uh you know help from city city 730 00:31:40,640 --> 00:31:47,200 staff, but um certainly it's it's those 731 00:31:43,120 --> 00:31:48,559 that feel that um that you know they've 732 00:31:47,200 --> 00:31:52,000 they've really been heard and really 733 00:31:48,559 --> 00:31:54,320 been helped that um are more likely to 734 00:31:52,000 --> 00:31:56,559 uh understandably give an overall uh 735 00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:58,799 positive satisfaction rating. 736 00:31:56,559 --> 00:32:02,640 Um, and then that's also followed by 737 00:31:58,799 --> 00:32:05,919 being able to easily find um the right 738 00:32:02,640 --> 00:32:10,399 um right staff to uh to answer your 739 00:32:05,919 --> 00:32:13,440 problem. Um, so that's to me that that I 740 00:32:10,399 --> 00:32:15,919 guess that's a more um kind of concrete 741 00:32:13,440 --> 00:32:18,159 um aspect that you're able to um put 742 00:32:15,919 --> 00:32:20,960 action towards making sure that um 743 00:32:18,159 --> 00:32:23,519 people have um the information available 744 00:32:20,960 --> 00:32:26,080 to them or being able to easily contact 745 00:32:23,519 --> 00:32:27,600 those who can point them in the right um 746 00:32:26,080 --> 00:32:30,000 in the right direction. And especially 747 00:32:27,600 --> 00:32:33,600 because that's um that was something 748 00:32:30,000 --> 00:32:36,240 that was lower end uh lower on the um on 749 00:32:33,600 --> 00:32:38,880 the overall scale when uh comparing to 750 00:32:36,240 --> 00:32:41,092 the other um aspects that might be 751 00:32:38,880 --> 00:32:43,112 something worth uh worth focusing on. 752 00:32:41,092 --> 00:32:43,112 [snorts] 753 00:32:43,679 --> 00:32:49,440 Okay. And then looking at um value for 754 00:32:46,880 --> 00:32:51,279 tax dollars. I think this is a a key 755 00:32:49,440 --> 00:32:55,279 metric that's asked every year asking 756 00:32:51,279 --> 00:32:58,640 people um you know how would they um you 757 00:32:55,279 --> 00:33:02,640 know how do they feel their um overall 758 00:32:58,640 --> 00:33:04,640 value for tax dollars rate. Um again we 759 00:33:02,640 --> 00:33:07,279 we see 760 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:09,840 that similar um actually no change in 761 00:33:07,279 --> 00:33:12,240 the top two box with 70% 7 and 10 762 00:33:09,840 --> 00:33:14,080 residents um believing that they either 763 00:33:12,240 --> 00:33:16,480 get good or very good value for their 764 00:33:14,080 --> 00:33:19,679 tax dollars and uh a little bit of a 765 00:33:16,480 --> 00:33:21,279 bump up in uh those who are at the uh 766 00:33:19,679 --> 00:33:25,039 the most positive those that say they 767 00:33:21,279 --> 00:33:26,720 get very good value. Um, one key 768 00:33:25,039 --> 00:33:29,039 difference here in demographics is that 769 00:33:26,720 --> 00:33:31,600 there is a a very strong correlation 770 00:33:29,039 --> 00:33:35,679 between um, age and their perceptions of 771 00:33:31,600 --> 00:33:38,320 tax dollars in that um, the the youngest 772 00:33:35,679 --> 00:33:40,240 group um, 18 to 29 year olds, they're 773 00:33:38,320 --> 00:33:42,880 least likely to say they get good value 774 00:33:40,240 --> 00:33:45,840 for their tax dollars. Um, well, you 775 00:33:42,880 --> 00:33:48,320 keep increasing up in age and uh, more 776 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:50,880 so people feel that they're increasingly 777 00:33:48,320 --> 00:33:52,720 more positive about what they receive. 778 00:33:50,880 --> 00:33:54,480 And I think that's also that's tied to 779 00:33:52,720 --> 00:33:55,919 uh to home ownership here is you know 780 00:33:54,480 --> 00:33:59,600 the older you are the more likely you 781 00:33:55,919 --> 00:34:02,240 are to um to have a home and also feel 782 00:33:59,600 --> 00:34:04,480 that you're um you're receiving services 783 00:34:02,240 --> 00:34:08,120 that give you good uh good value for 784 00:34:04,480 --> 00:34:08,120 your for your money. 785 00:34:10,639 --> 00:34:18,639 Um and then so again this uh we are able 786 00:34:13,599 --> 00:34:21,599 to um find comparable um stats on other 787 00:34:18,639 --> 00:34:24,240 m municipalities. this was on the same 788 00:34:21,599 --> 00:34:26,079 uh four-point scale um across all of 789 00:34:24,240 --> 00:34:29,040 these uh surveys that we were able to 790 00:34:26,079 --> 00:34:30,639 find. So, I think it's um it's a 791 00:34:29,040 --> 00:34:33,119 certainly a positive that you see city 792 00:34:30,639 --> 00:34:36,480 of Courtney right up there um near the 793 00:34:33,119 --> 00:34:41,280 top of the list uh given that this is a 794 00:34:36,480 --> 00:34:43,679 a directly um direct uh comparison to uh 795 00:34:41,280 --> 00:34:47,240 how these other mun municipalities ask 796 00:34:43,679 --> 00:34:47,240 this question. Sorry. 797 00:34:49,919 --> 00:34:57,200 Okay. And then uh here we just have um 798 00:34:53,839 --> 00:35:01,440 sentiments on balancing taxation and 799 00:34:57,200 --> 00:35:05,119 service delivery levels. Um so similar 800 00:35:01,440 --> 00:35:08,800 to um what we've seen in the past years 801 00:35:05,119 --> 00:35:12,960 is that um not the majority but the most 802 00:35:08,800 --> 00:35:17,680 common um uh answer here is to simply 803 00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:19,440 say we want taxes to be maintained. um I 804 00:35:17,680 --> 00:35:22,000 don't you know I don't necessarily want 805 00:35:19,440 --> 00:35:24,240 to uh receive a lot less for my services 806 00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:26,000 but I don't want to pay more um for 807 00:35:24,240 --> 00:35:27,599 anything. And then you've got an equal 808 00:35:26,000 --> 00:35:29,520 proportion on either side who say they 809 00:35:27,599 --> 00:35:33,359 either want to see uh an increase to 810 00:35:29,520 --> 00:35:35,520 taxes to um to keep up or enhance uh 811 00:35:33,359 --> 00:35:40,320 services versus those that say they want 812 00:35:35,520 --> 00:35:44,359 to um to reduce their taxes uh even if 813 00:35:40,320 --> 00:35:44,359 it means cutting services. 814 00:35:47,520 --> 00:35:53,520 Okay. And then um here we just have some 815 00:35:51,200 --> 00:35:58,800 uh quick notes about communication from 816 00:35:53,520 --> 00:36:00,960 the city. Um about uh essentially no 817 00:35:58,800 --> 00:36:04,320 difference from um what was recorded 818 00:36:00,960 --> 00:36:07,040 last year in that um just over a third 819 00:36:04,320 --> 00:36:08,960 of residents feel that they receive uh 820 00:36:07,040 --> 00:36:10,640 too little information from the city 821 00:36:08,960 --> 00:36:12,480 where um just about everyone else says 822 00:36:10,640 --> 00:36:14,400 they get the right amount of 823 00:36:12,480 --> 00:36:17,040 information. 824 00:36:14,400 --> 00:36:21,839 And in terms of what type of information 825 00:36:17,040 --> 00:36:23,680 they need from the city uh is um city 826 00:36:21,839 --> 00:36:26,400 planning and development is kind of the 827 00:36:23,680 --> 00:36:27,760 the the main thing that um is top of 828 00:36:26,400 --> 00:36:29,920 mind for people in terms of what they 829 00:36:27,760 --> 00:36:32,640 want to receive. And I think that goes 830 00:36:29,920 --> 00:36:35,119 um you know fits with um when we looked 831 00:36:32,640 --> 00:36:37,200 at the the key drivers for overall 832 00:36:35,119 --> 00:36:39,119 satisfaction of city services. there was 833 00:36:37,200 --> 00:36:42,000 that land use and and community planning 834 00:36:39,119 --> 00:36:44,960 that was um you know what is seen as the 835 00:36:42,000 --> 00:36:46,880 biggest driver of satisfaction. I think 836 00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:51,520 this this certainly ties into that in 837 00:36:46,880 --> 00:36:53,280 that um people generally want um may 838 00:36:51,520 --> 00:36:56,720 want more information about city 839 00:36:53,280 --> 00:36:58,400 planning and development um in order to 840 00:36:56,720 --> 00:37:01,599 um you know feel like they understand 841 00:36:58,400 --> 00:37:04,920 what's going on or have a say in um in 842 00:37:01,599 --> 00:37:04,920 what's happening. 843 00:37:04,960 --> 00:37:09,520 So there so there are a few more slides 844 00:37:08,079 --> 00:37:11,119 though, but just because I don't want to 845 00:37:09,520 --> 00:37:14,000 take up uh too much of anyone's time, I 846 00:37:11,119 --> 00:37:16,160 think I hit on um all of the kind of key 847 00:37:14,000 --> 00:37:19,200 um points that I wanted to discuss with 848 00:37:16,160 --> 00:37:21,680 this. Um I'm happy to answer any 849 00:37:19,200 --> 00:37:24,160 questions now. But also on that note, um 850 00:37:21,680 --> 00:37:26,079 if there is anything that um comes out 851 00:37:24,160 --> 00:37:29,280 of this, other questions that people 852 00:37:26,079 --> 00:37:32,560 have um as they review the report in 853 00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:34,160 more detail, um we're we're here and 854 00:37:32,560 --> 00:37:38,480 we're uh we're happy to answer any 855 00:37:34,160 --> 00:37:40,640 questions uh after the fact as well. 856 00:37:38,480 --> 00:37:42,000 » Uh fantastic. Thanks so much for for the 857 00:37:40,640 --> 00:37:45,440 presentation and and kind of 858 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:48,800 highlighting th those key uh metrics. Um 859 00:37:45,440 --> 00:37:51,359 it it's quite interesting to see how um 860 00:37:48,800 --> 00:37:52,720 you know one uh those numbers play out 861 00:37:51,359 --> 00:37:55,200 for the city of Courtney and then how 862 00:37:52,720 --> 00:37:57,839 they compare with others. Um I guess 863 00:37:55,200 --> 00:38:00,480 it's it's it's a challenge to know what 864 00:37:57,839 --> 00:38:02,000 scale people are using uh community to 865 00:38:00,480 --> 00:38:04,720 community. You like you said when you 866 00:38:02,000 --> 00:38:07,119 compare it it might be one out of four 867 00:38:04,720 --> 00:38:09,040 uh 0 to 10 like just depending on what 868 00:38:07,119 --> 00:38:11,200 that question is. So um really 869 00:38:09,040 --> 00:38:15,680 appreciate some of that insight. Um and 870 00:38:11,200 --> 00:38:17,920 I'll pass it over to councelor healing. 871 00:38:15,680 --> 00:38:20,400 Thanks, mayor. No questions. Uh just one 872 00:38:17,920 --> 00:38:23,599 observation. Uh I think it's quite 873 00:38:20,400 --> 00:38:26,480 possible that the decline in uh overall 874 00:38:23,599 --> 00:38:29,599 satisfaction and recommending Courtney's 875 00:38:26,480 --> 00:38:32,800 place to live coincides with perceptions 876 00:38:29,599 --> 00:38:35,200 that it's too crowded and um concerns 877 00:38:32,800 --> 00:38:36,880 about traffic. And uh I think we have to 878 00:38:35,200 --> 00:38:39,520 bear in mind that for nine months of 879 00:38:36,880 --> 00:38:42,720 last year, we had a major traffic snarl. 880 00:38:39,520 --> 00:38:45,040 Um, I also noted that the uh uh you were 881 00:38:42,720 --> 00:38:46,800 more likely to be dissatisfied and not 882 00:38:45,040 --> 00:38:48,480 recommend the city if you were employed 883 00:38:46,800 --> 00:38:50,240 as opposed to if you weren't employed, 884 00:38:48,480 --> 00:38:52,000 which means that it was people who were, 885 00:38:50,240 --> 00:38:53,680 you know, having to drive and get around 886 00:38:52,000 --> 00:38:55,119 the city to get to work and get to where 887 00:38:53,680 --> 00:38:57,280 they were going that were less 888 00:38:55,119 --> 00:38:59,520 satisfied. And I think that may have a 889 00:38:57,280 --> 00:39:01,599 lot to do with the sewer conveyance 890 00:38:59,520 --> 00:39:04,640 project. Uh, but otherwise, there's a 891 00:39:01,599 --> 00:39:07,359 lot to uh to learn uh from the survey. 892 00:39:04,640 --> 00:39:09,520 And I certainly have heard from people 893 00:39:07,359 --> 00:39:10,960 that many people think the city's too 894 00:39:09,520 --> 00:39:13,040 crowded. They don't particularly like 895 00:39:10,960 --> 00:39:17,040 the scale of development and and the 896 00:39:13,040 --> 00:39:18,640 congestion in some parts. Uh that uh um 897 00:39:17,040 --> 00:39:20,640 it's something that takes some getting 898 00:39:18,640 --> 00:39:22,560 used to. Thanks. 899 00:39:20,640 --> 00:39:23,839 » Thanks very much, Councelor Hill and 900 00:39:22,560 --> 00:39:26,160 Councelor Moore. 901 00:39:23,839 --> 00:39:28,000 » Yeah, thanks Mayor. Um thanks for it's a 902 00:39:26,160 --> 00:39:32,079 lot of work putting this all together. 903 00:39:28,000 --> 00:39:34,000 Um I while I appreciated some of the 904 00:39:32,079 --> 00:39:36,720 insights that you offered, I think it's 905 00:39:34,000 --> 00:39:38,720 good to recognize that this um this 906 00:39:36,720 --> 00:39:41,839 survey doesn't include narrative 907 00:39:38,720 --> 00:39:45,040 responses. I don't believe um or um 908 00:39:41,839 --> 00:39:47,599 qualitative. So I mean we all have 909 00:39:45,040 --> 00:39:50,240 theories and they may be accurate or not 910 00:39:47,599 --> 00:39:52,560 why people answered a certain way. And I 911 00:39:50,240 --> 00:39:55,119 know that we are using the same survey 912 00:39:52,560 --> 00:39:56,880 for 5 years I believe. So there's 913 00:39:55,119 --> 00:39:58,480 obviously we don't want to we can't 914 00:39:56,880 --> 00:40:00,240 change anything at this point, but 915 00:39:58,480 --> 00:40:02,320 perhaps down the road it it may be 916 00:40:00,240 --> 00:40:05,359 useful to have a bit more of that 917 00:40:02,320 --> 00:40:07,760 qualitative information to know, you 918 00:40:05,359 --> 00:40:10,640 know, if if [snorts] there's a high 919 00:40:07,760 --> 00:40:12,720 percentage in one area, you know, why 920 00:40:10,640 --> 00:40:14,960 did that why did that person rate rate 921 00:40:12,720 --> 00:40:18,560 it that way? Because really we don't 922 00:40:14,960 --> 00:40:20,880 have the analysis of this data to know 923 00:40:18,560 --> 00:40:24,160 um to know the answers to those 924 00:40:20,880 --> 00:40:26,320 questions. So we can only speculate and 925 00:40:24,160 --> 00:40:29,680 so it does give us a good snapshot but I 926 00:40:26,320 --> 00:40:31,920 think um in future years it may be maybe 927 00:40:29,680 --> 00:40:34,079 good to dig a little bit deeper. I know 928 00:40:31,920 --> 00:40:36,400 that you did gloss over this the 929 00:40:34,079 --> 00:40:39,040 communication the communication piece a 930 00:40:36,400 --> 00:40:41,920 bit because it was running a bit long. 931 00:40:39,040 --> 00:40:43,839 Um but I think also another important 932 00:40:41,920 --> 00:40:45,839 piece is around how people like to 933 00:40:43,839 --> 00:40:47,119 receive their information and most 934 00:40:45,839 --> 00:40:49,520 people still do get it from the 935 00:40:47,119 --> 00:40:54,160 newspaper whether that's 936 00:40:49,520 --> 00:40:57,200 you know paper copy or online and um and 937 00:40:54,160 --> 00:41:01,599 uh so I think you know sometimes there's 938 00:40:57,200 --> 00:41:05,359 confusion or criticism around how we we 939 00:41:01,599 --> 00:41:07,119 do have a an online presence um for sure 940 00:41:05,359 --> 00:41:08,720 but and we're we've launched a 941 00:41:07,119 --> 00:41:11,839 newsletter but I think that's important 942 00:41:08,720 --> 00:41:13,760 to know how how people prefer to receive 943 00:41:11,839 --> 00:41:15,280 their information. Thanks. 944 00:41:13,760 --> 00:41:17,119 » That's a good point. And I just want to 945 00:41:15,280 --> 00:41:20,319 touch on um your first point just about 946 00:41:17,119 --> 00:41:23,599 the um the qualitative aspect. Um and so 947 00:41:20,319 --> 00:41:26,800 the um although with a survey like this, 948 00:41:23,599 --> 00:41:29,760 you're right in that you can't um dive 949 00:41:26,800 --> 00:41:32,240 too deep into things um in terms of 950 00:41:29,760 --> 00:41:34,079 having people answer um open-ended 951 00:41:32,240 --> 00:41:37,359 questions. There are a few in this like 952 00:41:34,079 --> 00:41:39,440 the um the question that um starts off 953 00:41:37,359 --> 00:41:41,520 with top of- mind issues. Um that's 954 00:41:39,440 --> 00:41:45,200 strictly a just an open-ended question 955 00:41:41,520 --> 00:41:47,920 for for people to um however answer 956 00:41:45,200 --> 00:41:50,160 however uh they want for that. Um, so 957 00:41:47,920 --> 00:41:52,240 yeah, there there are a few open-ended 958 00:41:50,160 --> 00:41:55,599 questions like that um in this survey 959 00:41:52,240 --> 00:41:59,040 that um when you see kind of those um 960 00:41:55,599 --> 00:42:00,800 those charts that have like a a lot of 961 00:41:59,040 --> 00:42:03,280 different response options, typically 962 00:42:00,800 --> 00:42:05,119 those are um generally open-ended 963 00:42:03,280 --> 00:42:07,760 questions that people just give their 964 00:42:05,119 --> 00:42:12,480 their thoughts. Um and then those are 965 00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:14,480 kind of coded into um into data that we 966 00:42:12,480 --> 00:42:16,720 can kind of we group them into themes so 967 00:42:14,480 --> 00:42:20,400 that you can kind of get a quantitative 968 00:42:16,720 --> 00:42:23,040 metric on um on what those themes are. 969 00:42:20,400 --> 00:42:25,200 Um but yes, one of the challenges with 970 00:42:23,040 --> 00:42:29,599 getting more qualitative data in a 971 00:42:25,200 --> 00:42:33,119 survey like this is um is simply uh the 972 00:42:29,599 --> 00:42:35,040 cost and to be able to um keep people on 973 00:42:33,119 --> 00:42:37,440 the phone. Um, a lot of people don't 974 00:42:35,040 --> 00:42:39,040 want to spend uh a ton of time answering 975 00:42:37,440 --> 00:42:42,160 a survey that ends up getting long 976 00:42:39,040 --> 00:42:43,760 because they keep having to um answer 977 00:42:42,160 --> 00:42:47,520 kind of open-ended questions where they 978 00:42:43,760 --> 00:42:51,760 have to think on the spot. Um, but yeah, 979 00:42:47,520 --> 00:42:54,560 I I agree there's always value in um in 980 00:42:51,760 --> 00:42:56,800 digging deeper into some qualitative um 981 00:42:54,560 --> 00:43:00,720 aspects when you use the the 982 00:42:56,800 --> 00:43:04,560 quantitative um evidence to um kind of 983 00:43:00,720 --> 00:43:06,079 decide where you need to focus. 984 00:43:04,560 --> 00:43:08,000 and uh followup council. 985 00:43:06,079 --> 00:43:09,839 » Yeah, just very quickly. Yeah, I totally 986 00:43:08,000 --> 00:43:11,839 get that piece about the open-ended. I 987 00:43:09,839 --> 00:43:14,880 think my comment was more around the 988 00:43:11,839 --> 00:43:18,800 rationale for for mentioning it in the 989 00:43:14,880 --> 00:43:20,880 first place or or um rating the topics 990 00:43:18,800 --> 00:43:23,200 like you know what was the reason behind 991 00:43:20,880 --> 00:43:25,599 it but but I appreciate that. Thank you. 992 00:43:23,200 --> 00:43:27,680 » Right. Yep. Fair. 993 00:43:25,599 --> 00:43:30,400 » Excellent. And Mr. Okonnell 994 00:43:27,680 --> 00:43:32,640 » Uh thanks very much. So, um, councelor 995 00:43:30,400 --> 00:43:34,079 Moren, you may recall we had that, um, 996 00:43:32,640 --> 00:43:36,160 come up when we did the first year of 997 00:43:34,079 --> 00:43:38,160 the survey with the net promoter score, 998 00:43:36,160 --> 00:43:40,000 and there was a lot of speculation as to 999 00:43:38,160 --> 00:43:42,319 why we scored so low, and we thought, 1000 00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:44,079 oh, is it really because people wouldn't 1001 00:43:42,319 --> 00:43:46,079 want to promote the city for negative 1002 00:43:44,079 --> 00:43:48,000 reasons, or was it that we don't want 1003 00:43:46,079 --> 00:43:49,440 any more people coming to the island and 1004 00:43:48,000 --> 00:43:51,760 to Courtney because it's so great, we 1005 00:43:49,440 --> 00:43:54,000 want to preserve it that way. Um, so we 1006 00:43:51,760 --> 00:43:55,680 added that secondary question in order 1007 00:43:54,000 --> 00:43:58,560 to probe a bit deeper to get a bit more 1008 00:43:55,680 --> 00:44:00,880 insight on that. At the same time, um, 1009 00:43:58,560 --> 00:44:02,480 council's been very supportive and has 1010 00:44:00,880 --> 00:44:04,560 adopted a brand new communication 1011 00:44:02,480 --> 00:44:06,640 strategy and an engagement strategy 1012 00:44:04,560 --> 00:44:09,040 which is on the verge of completing with 1013 00:44:06,640 --> 00:44:11,440 the implementation strategy for that. 1014 00:44:09,040 --> 00:44:13,599 And really basically this is the 1015 00:44:11,440 --> 00:44:16,079 statistic benchmarking survey and that's 1016 00:44:13,599 --> 00:44:17,760 the purpose of it. whereas this is a 1017 00:44:16,079 --> 00:44:19,760 really good indicator for when we're 1018 00:44:17,760 --> 00:44:22,160 doing other forms of engagement on 1019 00:44:19,760 --> 00:44:24,960 specific service areas or initiatives or 1020 00:44:22,160 --> 00:44:26,800 policy decisions um to probe a little 1021 00:44:24,960 --> 00:44:29,680 bit deeper into some of these areas at 1022 00:44:26,800 --> 00:44:31,920 that point and also um benefiting from 1023 00:44:29,680 --> 00:44:33,520 directly targeting the various user 1024 00:44:31,920 --> 00:44:36,319 groups as opposed to something that's a 1025 00:44:33,520 --> 00:44:38,000 bit more general. At the same time, um, 1026 00:44:36,319 --> 00:44:40,000 if we have these types of items that 1027 00:44:38,000 --> 00:44:42,079 come up and and we we're not seeing any 1028 00:44:40,000 --> 00:44:44,480 kind of connection, it's absolutely 1029 00:44:42,079 --> 00:44:46,160 possible to add on secondary questions. 1030 00:44:44,480 --> 00:44:47,440 U, it's just a matter of what do we want 1031 00:44:46,160 --> 00:44:49,280 to come off, what do we want to put on 1032 00:44:47,440 --> 00:44:50,800 or do we want to expand and what are the 1033 00:44:49,280 --> 00:44:52,400 impacts of that. But yes, we have 1034 00:44:50,800 --> 00:44:54,480 learned that lesson from the first one 1035 00:44:52,400 --> 00:44:56,720 to the third one and uh, we were 1036 00:44:54,480 --> 00:44:58,319 surprised at the response. So, it was 1037 00:44:56,720 --> 00:45:01,040 not what we suspected. Thank you for the 1038 00:44:58,319 --> 00:45:05,680 question though. Well, thanks for that 1039 00:45:01,040 --> 00:45:07,200 uh that insight and um uh one one um uh 1040 00:45:05,680 --> 00:45:09,520 sort of comment I wanted to make is 1041 00:45:07,200 --> 00:45:11,280 maybe if we forward went forward a few 1042 00:45:09,520 --> 00:45:13,839 slides to the preferred method of 1043 00:45:11,280 --> 00:45:17,119 contacting uh the city. I think it's a 1044 00:45:13,839 --> 00:45:21,040 pretty important slide that um actually 1045 00:45:17,119 --> 00:45:22,480 reflects kind of um uh some of the work 1046 00:45:21,040 --> 00:45:25,839 that we've done. So, I mean, when we 1047 00:45:22,480 --> 00:45:27,599 look at um uh uh the fact that there 1048 00:45:25,839 --> 00:45:30,000 there's a local newspaper, I think there 1049 00:45:27,599 --> 00:45:32,160 may be one more. It might be one more 1050 00:45:30,000 --> 00:45:34,400 ahead of this. 1051 00:45:32,160 --> 00:45:36,240 Uh that's the one. Yeah. So, when you're 1052 00:45:34,400 --> 00:45:38,560 actually contacting the city uh about 1053 00:45:36,240 --> 00:45:41,599 your concerns, um the telephone is 1054 00:45:38,560 --> 00:45:45,599 definitely uh high up there. Email uh 1055 00:45:41,599 --> 00:45:48,319 and um uh and then in person. And you 1056 00:45:45,599 --> 00:45:50,640 know, when we look uh the city website's 1057 00:45:48,319 --> 00:45:53,520 relatively, uh far down there for now, 1058 00:45:50,640 --> 00:45:55,599 but I hopefully uh with the new website, 1059 00:45:53,520 --> 00:45:57,440 um that will become more effective and a 1060 00:45:55,599 --> 00:46:00,240 place for people to go. And and one of 1061 00:45:57,440 --> 00:46:01,599 the things uh that I've noticed um and 1062 00:46:00,240 --> 00:46:05,280 I'm not sure if it's just with the new 1063 00:46:01,599 --> 00:46:07,440 website. Um but, uh what what I've seen 1064 00:46:05,280 --> 00:46:10,079 when I'm searching for things now is 1065 00:46:07,440 --> 00:46:12,160 pretty much every page includes a 1066 00:46:10,079 --> 00:46:13,920 contact on there. And so that's 1067 00:46:12,160 --> 00:46:15,520 something that again when we look at 1068 00:46:13,920 --> 00:46:18,079 that that question about being able to 1069 00:46:15,520 --> 00:46:20,240 find the right person um the fact that 1070 00:46:18,079 --> 00:46:21,920 you know I mean I I have other ways of 1071 00:46:20,240 --> 00:46:24,079 finding the right person but the fact 1072 00:46:21,920 --> 00:46:26,800 that I can uh search for something on 1073 00:46:24,079 --> 00:46:28,160 the website get to a page and then if I 1074 00:46:26,800 --> 00:46:30,319 want further information there's 1075 00:46:28,160 --> 00:46:33,200 actually a a name right there which I I 1076 00:46:30,319 --> 00:46:34,640 found u like one of the things I really 1077 00:46:33,200 --> 00:46:36,480 love about the new website. There's many 1078 00:46:34,640 --> 00:46:40,640 things that I like about it, but I think 1079 00:46:36,480 --> 00:46:42,960 it really pushes us uh down um uh that 1080 00:46:40,640 --> 00:46:44,560 path of, you know, when we look at the 1081 00:46:42,960 --> 00:46:47,599 numbers. It'd be really interesting to 1082 00:46:44,560 --> 00:46:50,160 see um how these numbers are reflected a 1083 00:46:47,599 --> 00:46:51,599 year from now considering our first uh 1084 00:46:50,160 --> 00:46:54,319 newsletter just went out on Monday, 1085 00:46:51,599 --> 00:46:55,920 which again really excited about uh that 1086 00:46:54,319 --> 00:46:58,640 newsletter and getting information out 1087 00:46:55,920 --> 00:47:01,440 to people. And even though it might be 1088 00:46:58,640 --> 00:47:04,560 uh at this point not uh a way for people 1089 00:47:01,440 --> 00:47:06,880 to uh contact city belt concerns because 1090 00:47:04,560 --> 00:47:08,960 we're initiating that contact, people 1091 00:47:06,880 --> 00:47:11,280 have that as an actual way to get back 1092 00:47:08,960 --> 00:47:12,800 to the city um and prompt them because 1093 00:47:11,280 --> 00:47:15,520 sometimes you forget about the things 1094 00:47:12,800 --> 00:47:17,599 that annoy you. Um and uh and the fact 1095 00:47:15,520 --> 00:47:19,760 that you have the the city contacting 1096 00:47:17,599 --> 00:47:22,319 you on a regular basis with the ability 1097 00:47:19,760 --> 00:47:24,720 to reply, I think is great. Um and then 1098 00:47:22,319 --> 00:47:27,040 lastly, I just love the fact that social 1099 00:47:24,720 --> 00:47:28,560 media is so far down on this list. So, 1100 00:47:27,040 --> 00:47:32,000 um, again, I think that just really 1101 00:47:28,560 --> 00:47:34,400 reinforces, um, decisions made, uh, by 1102 00:47:32,000 --> 00:47:37,440 staff and council around, um, our social 1103 00:47:34,400 --> 00:47:39,440 media interactions. So, uh, with that, 1104 00:47:37,440 --> 00:47:43,280 um, I don't see any further questions or 1105 00:47:39,440 --> 00:47:45,680 comments. Um, this is just, uh, for 1106 00:47:43,280 --> 00:47:48,160 receipt. 1107 00:47:45,680 --> 00:47:50,240 » All right. And I'll receive that on 1108 00:47:48,160 --> 00:47:53,200 behalf of council unanimously. Thanks 1109 00:47:50,240 --> 00:47:55,359 very much for the report. Um, and next 1110 00:47:53,200 --> 00:47:59,119 we'll move into financial services, the 1111 00:47:55,359 --> 00:48:01,040 2026 2030 financial plan taxation 1112 00:47:59,119 --> 00:48:02,160 scenario, and I'll pass it over to Mr. 1113 00:48:01,040 --> 00:48:04,319 Garvin. 1114 00:48:02,160 --> 00:48:06,480 » Uh, thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um, on the 1115 00:48:04,319 --> 00:48:09,119 staff on our agenda today, beginning on 1116 00:48:06,480 --> 00:48:10,960 page 133 of the agenda, is a follow-up 1117 00:48:09,119 --> 00:48:13,440 staff report as a result of the 1118 00:48:10,960 --> 00:48:15,359 direction council gave us uh, November 1119 00:48:13,440 --> 00:48:18,000 26th and 27th committee the whole 1120 00:48:15,359 --> 00:48:21,599 meetings on our budget. Council was very 1121 00:48:18,000 --> 00:48:23,440 specific on uh what some requirements 1122 00:48:21,599 --> 00:48:25,119 were, some information they wanted to 1123 00:48:23,440 --> 00:48:26,400 facilitate the creation of our financial 1124 00:48:25,119 --> 00:48:28,480 plan. [gasps] 1125 00:48:26,400 --> 00:48:31,200 Uh both our annual financial plan for 1126 00:48:28,480 --> 00:48:32,880 2026 and then the uh 5-year financial 1127 00:48:31,200 --> 00:48:35,440 plan. Uh Mr. Langmire is our finance 1128 00:48:32,880 --> 00:48:36,960 officer, is going to uh give an overview 1129 00:48:35,440 --> 00:48:40,559 in response to council direction, and 1130 00:48:36,960 --> 00:48:42,559 we're looking for um support to uh carry 1131 00:48:40,559 --> 00:48:48,400 on with the preparation of our financial 1132 00:48:42,559 --> 00:48:48,400 uh plan um in the next uh little while. 1133 00:48:48,480 --> 00:48:51,680 Mr. Lagman. 1134 00:48:50,000 --> 00:48:54,800 » Hello, Mayor and Council. Nice to be 1135 00:48:51,680 --> 00:48:56,559 here once again. So, as Jeff nicely 1136 00:48:54,800 --> 00:48:59,200 alluded, I'm here to talk about the 1137 00:48:56,559 --> 00:49:00,720 financial plan. So, council gave the 1138 00:48:59,200 --> 00:49:04,079 following direction back on November 1139 00:49:00,720 --> 00:49:07,520 27th. What I'm filling even on is the 1140 00:49:04,079 --> 00:49:10,880 taxation scenarios at 567% 1141 00:49:07,520 --> 00:49:15,559 with options on using 6 to 8.8 8 million 1142 00:49:10,880 --> 00:49:15,559 in a minimum surplus balance to be held. 1143 00:49:16,000 --> 00:49:19,280 This information is included in the 1144 00:49:17,599 --> 00:49:20,720 report. Now, I was a bit challenged by 1145 00:49:19,280 --> 00:49:23,200 fitting all this information onto one 1146 00:49:20,720 --> 00:49:24,720 slide, but it was less informative to 1147 00:49:23,200 --> 00:49:28,000 look at if you broke it up. So, what 1148 00:49:24,720 --> 00:49:30,559 we're really seeing is each column is a 1149 00:49:28,000 --> 00:49:33,440 year of the financial plan and then each 1150 00:49:30,559 --> 00:49:35,520 horizontal green divider is a percentage 1151 00:49:33,440 --> 00:49:36,880 change scenario. So council had 1152 00:49:35,520 --> 00:49:39,760 requested what would the scenarios look 1153 00:49:36,880 --> 00:49:42,000 like at five, six and 7% and then the 1154 00:49:39,760 --> 00:49:44,869 impact of smoothing the taxation change 1155 00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:46,480 over the following years. 1156 00:49:44,869 --> 00:49:48,880 [gasps] So doing this analysis, I really 1157 00:49:46,480 --> 00:49:50,640 realized that um 1158 00:49:48,880 --> 00:49:53,599 if we want to have a very smooth tax 1159 00:49:50,640 --> 00:49:56,559 change, we're going to be holding a $6 1160 00:49:53,599 --> 00:50:02,160 million surplus target and require 9% 1161 00:49:56,559 --> 00:50:05,520 tax change for 2026 and 2027. 1162 00:50:02,160 --> 00:50:09,680 At the 9% uh change, the impact of the 1163 00:50:05,520 --> 00:50:12,240 average home is just shy of $200, $197. 1164 00:50:09,680 --> 00:50:14,400 When doing this uh moving on to the next 1165 00:50:12,240 --> 00:50:17,200 slide of using that surplus target of 1166 00:50:14,400 --> 00:50:19,839 $8.8 million, it is substantial 1167 00:50:17,200 --> 00:50:23,040 substantial impact on the tax change 1168 00:50:19,839 --> 00:50:24,960 scenarios. If we note in the five and 1169 00:50:23,040 --> 00:50:28,240 six% change scenarios, those two 1170 00:50:24,960 --> 00:50:30,640 highlighted yellow cells, um those years 1171 00:50:28,240 --> 00:50:33,680 we're actually underneath or below our 1172 00:50:30,640 --> 00:50:36,960 desired surplus balance. So in addition 1173 00:50:33,680 --> 00:50:38,400 to raising taxes to meet our spending 1174 00:50:36,960 --> 00:50:40,400 obligations, we're actually raising 1175 00:50:38,400 --> 00:50:43,040 taxes to to meet our surplus balance 1176 00:50:40,400 --> 00:50:45,119 obligations, too. So this makes it more 1177 00:50:43,040 --> 00:50:47,440 challenging that it is not recommended 1178 00:50:45,119 --> 00:50:50,319 to be in these areas holding that $8.8 1179 00:50:47,440 --> 00:50:53,119 million surplus balance. 1180 00:50:50,319 --> 00:50:55,599 looking forward to 1181 00:50:53,119 --> 00:50:57,760 a higher change. Holding the higher 1182 00:50:55,599 --> 00:50:59,599 balance makes it more challenging to 1183 00:50:57,760 --> 00:51:01,599 have additional funds on hand to smooth 1184 00:50:59,599 --> 00:51:04,599 out the taxation changes in the future 1185 00:51:01,599 --> 00:51:04,599 years. 1186 00:51:04,720 --> 00:51:08,480 One thing I wanted to highlight is the 1187 00:51:06,240 --> 00:51:10,160 change in method of how we determine how 1188 00:51:08,480 --> 00:51:12,640 much is the reasonable amount of surplus 1189 00:51:10,160 --> 00:51:14,160 to be held. An item that was brought up 1190 00:51:12,640 --> 00:51:16,880 is that we shouldn't really be 1191 00:51:14,160 --> 00:51:18,480 maintaining general surplus uh for 1192 00:51:16,880 --> 00:51:20,400 spending items that we have specific 1193 00:51:18,480 --> 00:51:22,800 reserves for. So under the revised 1194 00:51:20,400 --> 00:51:24,640 method of a target surplus balance, you 1195 00:51:22,800 --> 00:51:27,280 can see that we've removed uh solid 1196 00:51:24,640 --> 00:51:30,960 waste, RCMP contract costs, and gaming 1197 00:51:27,280 --> 00:51:33,119 expenditures from our total general fund 1198 00:51:30,960 --> 00:51:36,880 spending. So it brings the total general 1199 00:51:33,119 --> 00:51:40,079 fund spending from 55.9 million down to 1200 00:51:36,880 --> 00:51:42,559 42.2 million. This really drives how 1201 00:51:40,079 --> 00:51:46,000 much cash we should have on hand in the 1202 00:51:42,559 --> 00:51:48,160 event that something occurs. So on the 1203 00:51:46,000 --> 00:51:50,640 far right hand side we have the reserved 1204 00:51:48,160 --> 00:51:54,480 surplus target balances 1205 00:51:50,640 --> 00:51:56,960 and looking at um one of the driving 1206 00:51:54,480 --> 00:52:00,000 factors of how much surplus you have on 1207 00:51:56,960 --> 00:52:02,319 hand. It really comes down to how big is 1208 00:52:00,000 --> 00:52:04,480 your organization, what other reserves 1209 00:52:02,319 --> 00:52:08,079 do you have on hand, how often you get 1210 00:52:04,480 --> 00:52:10,640 paid and what other funding options are 1211 00:52:08,079 --> 00:52:13,359 out there for you. So this really came 1212 00:52:10,640 --> 00:52:16,720 into [snorts] consideration in in my 1213 00:52:13,359 --> 00:52:18,559 recommendation. So in the prior years I 1214 00:52:16,720 --> 00:52:20,400 took a more conservative approach and 1215 00:52:18,559 --> 00:52:21,839 these were coming out of likely 1216 00:52:20,400 --> 00:52:24,240 influence from the co years that the 1217 00:52:21,839 --> 00:52:27,440 city should be holding about 20% of 1218 00:52:24,240 --> 00:52:30,960 annual spending on hand. After doing 1219 00:52:27,440 --> 00:52:33,440 this analysis looking at literature on 1220 00:52:30,960 --> 00:52:35,119 what surplus balance is I have changed 1221 00:52:33,440 --> 00:52:38,480 my recommendation to be sitting at that 1222 00:52:35,119 --> 00:52:40,720 15% range. I recognize that the city has 1223 00:52:38,480 --> 00:52:43,200 a number of reserves and we have access 1224 00:52:40,720 --> 00:52:46,240 to other sources of funding. So it is 1225 00:52:43,200 --> 00:52:50,079 reasonable to use a different target. So 1226 00:52:46,240 --> 00:52:53,119 that brings me to the recommendations. 1227 00:52:50,079 --> 00:52:56,240 So to get future direction on the 1228 00:52:53,119 --> 00:52:58,800 financial plan, one piece that needs to 1229 00:52:56,240 --> 00:53:00,720 come first is where does council want to 1230 00:52:58,800 --> 00:53:02,960 hold a surplus balance because that'll 1231 00:53:00,720 --> 00:53:05,280 greatly influence our available surplus 1232 00:53:02,960 --> 00:53:08,960 to adjust future tax changes and the 1233 00:53:05,280 --> 00:53:12,079 2026 tax change. So I'm recommending we 1234 00:53:08,960 --> 00:53:14,240 hold a 15% balance. That's uh $6.3 1235 00:53:12,079 --> 00:53:16,559 million. 1236 00:53:14,240 --> 00:53:18,880 Another piece that flows into this is I 1237 00:53:16,559 --> 00:53:21,119 want to be sure that we're using capital 1238 00:53:18,880 --> 00:53:23,920 efficiently. Having cash in the bank is 1239 00:53:21,119 --> 00:53:27,280 not an effic efficient use of capital. 1240 00:53:23,920 --> 00:53:30,160 Having though a safety net if a expense 1241 00:53:27,280 --> 00:53:33,920 comes on is good 1242 00:53:30,160 --> 00:53:37,280 given the recommended surplus balance of 1243 00:53:33,920 --> 00:53:41,040 15%. My recommended tax change for 26 1244 00:53:37,280 --> 00:53:44,400 and 27 is 9% followed by a 9% change in 1245 00:53:41,040 --> 00:53:46,400 2026 or in 2027. Well, this really helps 1246 00:53:44,400 --> 00:53:48,800 it. It smooths the tax change over the 1247 00:53:46,400 --> 00:53:51,119 two years. It bridges a gap between the 1248 00:53:48,800 --> 00:53:54,720 election and provides an incoming 1249 00:53:51,119 --> 00:53:56,880 council one year of relatively stable 1250 00:53:54,720 --> 00:54:02,960 tax change before having to tackle the 1251 00:53:56,880 --> 00:54:04,800 projected 17.3% tax change in 2028. 1252 00:54:02,960 --> 00:54:07,280 And my final note though, although the 1253 00:54:04,800 --> 00:54:11,680 surplus balance is projected to be below 1254 00:54:07,280 --> 00:54:13,760 the $6.3 million target in 27, it is 1255 00:54:11,680 --> 00:54:15,440 reasonable that there will be some 1256 00:54:13,760 --> 00:54:17,920 variations coming from the completion of 1257 00:54:15,440 --> 00:54:20,079 the 2026 year. And that target is a 1258 00:54:17,920 --> 00:54:21,920 target. 1259 00:54:20,079 --> 00:54:23,680 And with that, that concludes my 1260 00:54:21,920 --> 00:54:26,680 presentation on the subject looking for 1261 00:54:23,680 --> 00:54:26,680 direction. 1262 00:54:27,119 --> 00:54:31,440 Excellent. Thanks very much for for the 1263 00:54:28,880 --> 00:54:34,880 presentation and and coming back with uh 1264 00:54:31,440 --> 00:54:36,319 those requested uh uh scenarios so that 1265 00:54:34,880 --> 00:54:38,480 it gives us a little bit more food for 1266 00:54:36,319 --> 00:54:41,359 thought. Um it's much appreciated and 1267 00:54:38,480 --> 00:54:44,079 I'll look to council for any comments, 1268 00:54:41,359 --> 00:54:45,760 suggestion and direction. 1269 00:54:44,079 --> 00:54:46,800 Councelor 1270 00:54:45,760 --> 00:54:48,559 McCall, 1271 00:54:46,800 --> 00:54:52,079 » I'll start with question. 1272 00:54:48,559 --> 00:54:54,640 » Um yeah, I I think this is really well 1273 00:54:52,079 --> 00:54:56,640 laid out and um the rationale makes 1274 00:54:54,640 --> 00:54:58,559 sense to me. It's also a good reflection 1275 00:54:56,640 --> 00:55:01,760 of the last discussion that we had 1276 00:54:58,559 --> 00:55:05,040 around this. So, uh, thanks for that. 1277 00:55:01,760 --> 00:55:07,599 Uh, the only and this might have been in 1278 00:55:05,040 --> 00:55:09,839 the last report, but we are chewing on I 1279 00:55:07,599 --> 00:55:13,119 think more um factors when we had our 1280 00:55:09,839 --> 00:55:15,839 last discussion, but um just the one 1281 00:55:13,119 --> 00:55:18,400 assumption on the new taxation revenue. 1282 00:55:15,839 --> 00:55:20,240 Um, I I assume that that's carried 1283 00:55:18,400 --> 00:55:23,200 forward in all five years of the 1284 00:55:20,240 --> 00:55:27,200 financial plan of 250,000 1285 00:55:23,200 --> 00:55:29,040 per year. Um, and I'm just wondering, is 1286 00:55:27,200 --> 00:55:31,040 that like based on the lowest year we've 1287 00:55:29,040 --> 00:55:33,119 had in the last couple years? I I 1288 00:55:31,040 --> 00:55:35,359 thought we're averaging quite a bit more 1289 00:55:33,119 --> 00:55:37,200 than that, but I I'm not I'm not 1290 00:55:35,359 --> 00:55:38,720 certain. So, maybe you could just expand 1291 00:55:37,200 --> 00:55:41,119 on that a little bit. 1292 00:55:38,720 --> 00:55:42,559 » Yeah. So, in the report, I identify some 1293 00:55:41,119 --> 00:55:45,119 of the assumptions that went into this 1294 00:55:42,559 --> 00:55:48,160 forecast. And the new tax revenue is 1295 00:55:45,119 --> 00:55:51,520 assumed at $250,000 per year across the 1296 00:55:48,160 --> 00:55:55,599 five years. This is less than we did in 1297 00:55:51,520 --> 00:55:58,319 the prior years. However, 250,000 is the 1298 00:55:55,599 --> 00:56:01,280 is what the 2026 1299 00:55:58,319 --> 00:56:02,880 new tax revenue is pegged at. And so, 1300 00:56:01,280 --> 00:56:05,040 you know, looking at what the average 1301 00:56:02,880 --> 00:56:06,480 was, we had a couple really big years in 1302 00:56:05,040 --> 00:56:09,680 there. And we've had years that have 1303 00:56:06,480 --> 00:56:11,680 been close to this 250. So, you know, 1304 00:56:09,680 --> 00:56:13,359 when projecting out, I don't want to 1305 00:56:11,680 --> 00:56:15,520 take the average just because it's the 1306 00:56:13,359 --> 00:56:18,240 average. I want to take what's happening 1307 00:56:15,520 --> 00:56:20,240 today and sort of forecast that forward. 1308 00:56:18,240 --> 00:56:22,160 So, given this, it still there is 1309 00:56:20,240 --> 00:56:24,480 flexibility. you know the the picture 1310 00:56:22,160 --> 00:56:26,079 could be better in 27 28 or 29 and then 1311 00:56:24,480 --> 00:56:27,839 the taxation scenarios are changing 1312 00:56:26,079 --> 00:56:31,200 slightly. 1313 00:56:27,839 --> 00:56:32,960 » That's helpful. So the 250,000 is the 1314 00:56:31,200 --> 00:56:35,520 amount that we're projecting for this 1315 00:56:32,960 --> 00:56:37,839 year based on basically what's in the 1316 00:56:35,520 --> 00:56:40,799 pipeline of development currently in 1317 00:56:37,839 --> 00:56:43,040 development services. Okay, that sounds 1318 00:56:40,799 --> 00:56:44,160 like a reasonable approach. Thanks for 1319 00:56:43,040 --> 00:56:46,079 that. 1320 00:56:44,160 --> 00:56:47,839 » Thanks Council McCullum and Mr. Garin. 1321 00:56:46,079 --> 00:56:51,200 » Thank you uh through the mayor. I just 1322 00:56:47,839 --> 00:56:53,520 want to add to Mr. Lang's comments. Um 1323 00:56:51,200 --> 00:56:55,359 if we reflect back you over the last 1324 00:56:53,520 --> 00:56:58,319 20-year period, we've had some really 1325 00:56:55,359 --> 00:57:01,599 big big swings. And so non-market growth 1326 00:56:58,319 --> 00:57:04,880 is uh especially what we're hearing um 1327 00:57:01,599 --> 00:57:06,400 you know what may be um in the future. 1328 00:57:04,880 --> 00:57:08,799 That's also tempered with the fact that 1329 00:57:06,400 --> 00:57:10,319 we're also understanding very 1330 00:57:08,799 --> 00:57:12,000 significant growth related to CFP 1331 00:57:10,319 --> 00:57:14,160 Comach. So it's a it's a very difficult 1332 00:57:12,000 --> 00:57:15,520 time now to really make that projection. 1333 00:57:14,160 --> 00:57:17,200 We just want to be conservative and 1334 00:57:15,520 --> 00:57:19,359 council has asked us to be, you know, 1335 00:57:17,200 --> 00:57:21,760 kind of conservative in both our revenue 1336 00:57:19,359 --> 00:57:24,319 projections uh as well as our cost 1337 00:57:21,760 --> 00:57:26,160 projections. So, at this point, we we're 1338 00:57:24,319 --> 00:57:28,160 saying uh this is a practice you want to 1339 00:57:26,160 --> 00:57:30,720 follow. 1340 00:57:28,160 --> 00:57:32,720 » Thanks for that. Uh uh and we'll pass 1341 00:57:30,720 --> 00:57:35,040 over to councelor. 1342 00:57:32,720 --> 00:57:36,400 » Thanks, Mayor. Um 1343 00:57:35,040 --> 00:57:38,880 first of all, I'm interested in the 1344 00:57:36,400 --> 00:57:40,240 language. We're using the term tax 1345 00:57:38,880 --> 00:57:45,200 change. Really, what we're talking about 1346 00:57:40,240 --> 00:57:45,200 is a tax increase. Is that correct? 1347 00:57:47,040 --> 00:57:53,119 Yeah, that is correct. 1348 00:57:49,920 --> 00:57:55,440 » Um I don't know tax change is maybe a 1349 00:57:53,119 --> 00:57:58,160 little more palatable but uh um how do 1350 00:57:55,440 --> 00:58:02,079 we rationalize uh 1351 00:57:58,160 --> 00:58:05,839 um a 9% increase uh which is 1352 00:58:02,079 --> 00:58:08,160 significantly above inflation. Um, I 1353 00:58:05,839 --> 00:58:12,799 mean, I know we're a growing city and uh 1354 00:58:08,160 --> 00:58:17,920 we obviously have uh uh increased costs 1355 00:58:12,799 --> 00:58:19,599 with that, but um uh you know, we've we 1356 00:58:17,920 --> 00:58:21,040 didn't see it reflected in our resident 1357 00:58:19,599 --> 00:58:23,040 survey that was just completed, but 1358 00:58:21,040 --> 00:58:27,040 affordability certainly is a concern out 1359 00:58:23,040 --> 00:58:28,799 there. And uh um you know, the a 9% 1360 00:58:27,040 --> 00:58:30,880 increase is still fairly significant. 1361 00:58:28,799 --> 00:58:34,599 So, I I I'm just interested to hear how 1362 00:58:30,880 --> 00:58:34,599 we rationalize that. 1363 00:58:36,160 --> 00:58:38,880 you know through through the mayor. 1364 00:58:37,280 --> 00:58:42,079 Thank you for the council council's 1365 00:58:38,880 --> 00:58:44,480 question. Um the finance plan in front 1366 00:58:42,079 --> 00:58:45,920 of you reflects the strategic priorities 1367 00:58:44,480 --> 00:58:48,000 identified with this council as well as 1368 00:58:45,920 --> 00:58:50,319 the capital program and so through the 1369 00:58:48,000 --> 00:58:52,799 development of this program we ask 1370 00:58:50,319 --> 00:58:55,119 council for direction and that's what's 1371 00:58:52,799 --> 00:58:56,559 the cost to deliver this is now the 1372 00:58:55,119 --> 00:58:58,960 question and we don't and I'm not taking 1373 00:58:56,559 --> 00:59:01,359 it and being glib about what the cost is 1374 00:58:58,960 --> 00:59:03,280 to deliver. Mr. Mr. Langmire is uh in 1375 00:59:01,359 --> 00:59:05,760 the last 3 years showed council what the 1376 00:59:03,280 --> 00:59:07,520 cost to deliver our services equal how 1377 00:59:05,760 --> 00:59:09,200 we have to address the needs of the 1378 00:59:07,520 --> 00:59:10,720 community and how to fund our capital 1379 00:59:09,200 --> 00:59:13,040 program and that's the majority of these 1380 00:59:10,720 --> 00:59:14,480 costs and so council didn't give us 1381 00:59:13,040 --> 00:59:16,880 direction to change our level of 1382 00:59:14,480 --> 00:59:20,319 service. What council asked us to do was 1383 00:59:16,880 --> 00:59:23,280 come forward with a way to utili 1384 00:59:20,319 --> 00:59:25,200 establish a service uh level 1385 00:59:23,280 --> 00:59:29,040 make sure that we have adequate reserves 1386 00:59:25,200 --> 00:59:31,280 and um to understand what our surplus is 1387 00:59:29,040 --> 00:59:32,960 and to smooth our tax over the next 5 1388 00:59:31,280 --> 00:59:35,440 years. So this is what's required to do 1389 00:59:32,960 --> 00:59:37,280 that. Now there may be a discussion and 1390 00:59:35,440 --> 00:59:40,160 direction from council to not do that 1391 00:59:37,280 --> 00:59:42,880 but the justification is what's required 1392 00:59:40,160 --> 00:59:44,720 to deliver our services and the staff 1393 00:59:42,880 --> 00:59:46,480 report that's attached our previous 1394 00:59:44,720 --> 00:59:48,799 staff report talked about where we land 1395 00:59:46,480 --> 00:59:50,880 in taxation and service delivery amongst 1396 00:59:48,799 --> 00:59:53,839 our comparator communities. Um the 1397 00:59:50,880 --> 00:59:56,559 community to our left uh has a higher 1398 00:59:53,839 --> 00:59:59,520 tax rate increase include plus their 1399 00:59:56,559 --> 01:00:02,400 infrastructure levy. the municipality to 1400 00:59:59,520 --> 01:00:04,799 our this direction [laughter] has chosen 1401 01:00:02,400 --> 01:00:06,480 to change uh their approach for this 1402 01:00:04,799 --> 01:00:08,240 financial year related to reserve 1403 01:00:06,480 --> 01:00:10,079 contributions. Uh that's that's a 1404 01:00:08,240 --> 01:00:11,359 direction from council. Uh but what's 1405 01:00:10,079 --> 01:00:13,440 been presented in front of you is 1406 01:00:11,359 --> 01:00:16,160 required to deliver our services that 1407 01:00:13,440 --> 01:00:17,839 the community is asking for and I 1408 01:00:16,160 --> 01:00:20,000 acknowledge that in our previous 1409 01:00:17,839 --> 01:00:23,520 discussions there were a series of tax 1410 01:00:20,000 --> 01:00:25,440 rates that were discussed. Um, and then 1411 01:00:23,520 --> 01:00:27,839 this tax rates coming back in order to 1412 01:00:25,440 --> 01:00:29,760 address what council's last direction 1413 01:00:27,839 --> 01:00:31,040 was. So that's why we're looking for 1414 01:00:29,760 --> 01:00:32,400 direction in order to prepare the 1415 01:00:31,040 --> 01:00:34,400 financial plan that would come back for 1416 01:00:32,400 --> 01:00:36,079 council. So it's not the we're not 1417 01:00:34,400 --> 01:00:38,240 preparing the this isn't the financial 1418 01:00:36,079 --> 01:00:40,720 plan as of today, but it's the direction 1419 01:00:38,240 --> 01:00:43,440 to create that financial plan. Hopefully 1420 01:00:40,720 --> 01:00:45,359 that clarifies. 1421 01:00:43,440 --> 01:00:47,081 » Thanks. Thanks, Mr. Garbit. And uh and 1422 01:00:45,359 --> 01:00:48,400 and again there there you know 1423 01:00:47,081 --> 01:00:50,400 [clears throat] are discussions at at 1424 01:00:48,400 --> 01:00:52,400 the federal and provincial levels about 1425 01:00:50,400 --> 01:00:55,359 uh potential grants and things like that 1426 01:00:52,400 --> 01:00:58,079 but again we we can't anticipate what 1427 01:00:55,359 --> 01:01:00,240 those are uh until we actually receive 1428 01:00:58,079 --> 01:01:02,640 them the money's in the bank so to speak 1429 01:01:00,240 --> 01:01:04,400 and uh and I mean that that goes I mean 1430 01:01:02,640 --> 01:01:06,640 we're going to have discussions around 1431 01:01:04,400 --> 01:01:08,079 DCC's as well um you know where the 1432 01:01:06,640 --> 01:01:10,160 federal government is saying that you 1433 01:01:08,079 --> 01:01:13,280 know they're going to have them and then 1434 01:01:10,160 --> 01:01:14,799 somehow make cities whole uh based on on 1435 01:01:13,280 --> 01:01:17,440 that. But again, how how do you make 1436 01:01:14,799 --> 01:01:19,599 those decisions when we're really 1437 01:01:17,440 --> 01:01:22,240 waiting for them to to uh provide that 1438 01:01:19,599 --> 01:01:25,520 leadership and uh and move forward uh 1439 01:01:22,240 --> 01:01:27,040 one way or the other? Uh Council Fish. 1440 01:01:25,520 --> 01:01:29,839 » Yeah, thanks Mayor and thanks for the 1441 01:01:27,040 --> 01:01:33,200 report. Um I'm more inclined. I I do 1442 01:01:29,839 --> 01:01:35,440 like the 6.3 uh million balance in our 1443 01:01:33,200 --> 01:01:37,520 surplus and I think that's probably 1444 01:01:35,440 --> 01:01:40,079 reasonable. Um, but I'm more interested 1445 01:01:37,520 --> 01:01:41,920 in seeing something like a six or 7% 1446 01:01:40,079 --> 01:01:44,799 increase. And the reason for that and 1447 01:01:41,920 --> 01:01:46,720 not say a 9% increase is it does 1448 01:01:44,799 --> 01:01:48,000 acknowledge, 1449 01:01:46,720 --> 01:01:51,440 excuse me, the difficult times that 1450 01:01:48,000 --> 01:01:53,760 we're in right now. And it forces um, 1451 01:01:51,440 --> 01:01:55,440 you know, the next council to make what 1452 01:01:53,760 --> 01:01:58,400 I think are obviously difficult 1453 01:01:55,440 --> 01:02:00,720 decisions, but uh, not to to accept a 1454 01:01:58,400 --> 01:02:03,119 year-over-year 9% increase, which I 1455 01:02:00,720 --> 01:02:06,720 think uh, would be very difficult to 1456 01:02:03,119 --> 01:02:08,720 swallow. That continued on. So, um, 1457 01:02:06,720 --> 01:02:12,160 yeah, I understand that it it looks 1458 01:02:08,720 --> 01:02:14,480 smooth, but it's also just kind of 1459 01:02:12,160 --> 01:02:16,240 softening the fact that we're we just 1460 01:02:14,480 --> 01:02:18,240 keep adding more and more services and 1461 01:02:16,240 --> 01:02:21,119 more and more, which they're great 1462 01:02:18,240 --> 01:02:22,880 services, but um, you know, with our 1463 01:02:21,119 --> 01:02:24,079 recent economic challenges with 1464 01:02:22,880 --> 01:02:25,520 everything that's going on in the world, 1465 01:02:24,079 --> 01:02:28,000 I think it might be just a little bit 1466 01:02:25,520 --> 01:02:31,359 rich. So, that's where I'm landing with 1467 01:02:28,000 --> 01:02:34,160 this year's budget. Thanks. 1468 01:02:31,359 --> 01:02:36,319 Thanks, Councelor FR and uh councelor 1469 01:02:34,160 --> 01:02:39,040 McCull. 1470 01:02:36,319 --> 01:02:43,440 » Yeah, thanks Mayor. Um 1471 01:02:39,040 --> 01:02:46,000 I had uh similar thinking around um what 1472 01:02:43,440 --> 01:02:49,839 the percentage and how much um surplus 1473 01:02:46,000 --> 01:02:53,680 makes sense to utilize. Uh while what's 1474 01:02:49,839 --> 01:02:56,960 in the recommendation um evens out the 1475 01:02:53,680 --> 01:02:59,680 tax increase year-to-year um the 6% 1476 01:02:56,960 --> 01:03:02,480 actually looks at what we have over and 1477 01:02:59,680 --> 01:03:05,359 above our our surplus target and divides 1478 01:03:02,480 --> 01:03:08,720 that amount between two taxation years. 1479 01:03:05,359 --> 01:03:12,319 So we are kind of splitting you know 1480 01:03:08,720 --> 01:03:16,880 that that money that additional surplus 1481 01:03:12,319 --> 01:03:18,319 that we have um to reduce taxation and 1482 01:03:16,880 --> 01:03:21,599 we could use it to smooth it out 1483 01:03:18,319 --> 01:03:24,000 entirely or or you know so I think you 1484 01:03:21,599 --> 01:03:28,640 know splitting it between this year and 1485 01:03:24,000 --> 01:03:30,720 next year is a is a fair approach. Um, I 1486 01:03:28,640 --> 01:03:33,039 think 1487 01:03:30,720 --> 01:03:36,079 it the the next council that comes in is 1488 01:03:33,039 --> 01:03:39,200 going to see um 1489 01:03:36,079 --> 01:03:41,119 a new fireh hall um coming into play and 1490 01:03:39,200 --> 01:03:43,920 there's there's a cost associated with 1491 01:03:41,119 --> 01:03:47,280 that. And you know, essentially what 1492 01:03:43,920 --> 01:03:49,680 we're doing is um addressing some of 1493 01:03:47,280 --> 01:03:51,680 that by pushing some surplus there. But 1494 01:03:49,680 --> 01:03:54,319 you know, you you just can't get around 1495 01:03:51,680 --> 01:03:58,000 um bringing a new asset with new 1496 01:03:54,319 --> 01:04:01,599 staffing online without um an impact to 1497 01:03:58,000 --> 01:04:04,079 uh what what revenue is required. So, 1498 01:04:01,599 --> 01:04:06,880 um, yeah, we could choose to smooth it 1499 01:04:04,079 --> 01:04:09,280 out now and and take on some of that 1500 01:04:06,880 --> 01:04:11,440 cost currently, but, um, it doesn't 1501 01:04:09,280 --> 01:04:13,280 really change the fact that, you know, 1502 01:04:11,440 --> 01:04:16,160 that service is needed and that 1503 01:04:13,280 --> 01:04:19,680 decision's been made and that is the the 1504 01:04:16,160 --> 01:04:25,520 cost impact to it. So, um I think it is 1505 01:04:19,680 --> 01:04:28,720 a fair approach um to go with the 6% um 1506 01:04:25,520 --> 01:04:30,720 and uh yeah, there are likely decisions 1507 01:04:28,720 --> 01:04:34,079 that will need to be make made around 1508 01:04:30,720 --> 01:04:35,520 maybe other services or or how um that's 1509 01:04:34,079 --> 01:04:38,160 addressed in the years going forward, 1510 01:04:35,520 --> 01:04:40,400 but our decision right now is is on this 1511 01:04:38,160 --> 01:04:42,960 year's tax. And I I think that's a 1512 01:04:40,400 --> 01:04:44,720 responsible approach is um using half of 1513 01:04:42,960 --> 01:04:46,799 the excess 1514 01:04:44,720 --> 01:04:49,839 um to make things a little easier this 1515 01:04:46,799 --> 01:04:51,920 year. Thanks. 1516 01:04:49,839 --> 01:04:52,880 » Thanks, Councilman Cullum and Council 1517 01:04:51,920 --> 01:04:55,039 Warren. 1518 01:04:52,880 --> 01:04:57,920 » Great. Thanks, Mayor. Um yeah, I think 1519 01:04:55,039 --> 01:05:01,280 I'm in fair amount of alignment with the 1520 01:04:57,920 --> 01:05:03,680 comments so far. Um I appreciate the 1521 01:05:01,280 --> 01:05:05,599 work that's been been done and you've 1522 01:05:03,680 --> 01:05:08,960 done what we asked you to do, which is 1523 01:05:05,599 --> 01:05:10,480 great. Um it's always um different when 1524 01:05:08,960 --> 01:05:14,559 you're looking at it all in black and 1525 01:05:10,480 --> 01:05:17,440 white, but I know um I question the 1526 01:05:14,559 --> 01:05:21,119 surplus that we were holding um because 1527 01:05:17,440 --> 01:05:23,200 it's not very palatable to me for people 1528 01:05:21,119 --> 01:05:25,680 to have an increase in taxes and then 1529 01:05:23,200 --> 01:05:28,880 see that we have whacks of money in the 1530 01:05:25,680 --> 01:05:31,920 bank because we were under budget or we 1531 01:05:28,880 --> 01:05:35,440 got grants or whatever. And the surplus 1532 01:05:31,920 --> 01:05:40,079 is, you know, has been consistent. And I 1533 01:05:35,440 --> 01:05:44,319 I would like to see us even um holding 1534 01:05:40,079 --> 01:05:49,280 less surplus and staying at the and um 1535 01:05:44,319 --> 01:05:51,680 and looking at a 6% um because I I mean 1536 01:05:49,280 --> 01:05:55,440 we know that some of the funding is is 1537 01:05:51,680 --> 01:05:57,760 drying up, but then we always seem to 1538 01:05:55,440 --> 01:06:00,960 find or you know be successful with some 1539 01:05:57,760 --> 01:06:02,720 grants. I'm not trying to um do what 1540 01:06:00,960 --> 01:06:04,799 Mayor Wells said and count our chickens 1541 01:06:02,720 --> 01:06:06,960 before they're hatched, but this is why 1542 01:06:04,799 --> 01:06:12,000 we do end up with surpluses because we 1543 01:06:06,960 --> 01:06:14,319 we end up um you know with these with 1544 01:06:12,000 --> 01:06:16,880 these extra funds and I think it would 1545 01:06:14,319 --> 01:06:19,520 be better to alleviate the the tax 1546 01:06:16,880 --> 01:06:23,039 increase for our citizens and have a 1547 01:06:19,520 --> 01:06:25,599 bunch of money in the bank. Thanks. 1548 01:06:23,039 --> 01:06:27,680 aside from what we need, we need to have 1549 01:06:25,599 --> 01:06:29,359 some, but I just don't think we need it 1550 01:06:27,680 --> 01:06:31,520 to the level that that we've been 1551 01:06:29,359 --> 01:06:33,440 carrying. Thanks. 1552 01:06:31,520 --> 01:06:35,280 » Thanks, Councelor Mren. Um, and next 1553 01:06:33,440 --> 01:06:36,799 we'll have Councelor Cole Hamilton who's 1554 01:06:35,280 --> 01:06:38,799 online, and then we have a couple more 1555 01:06:36,799 --> 01:06:41,200 lights uh back in the room here, but uh 1556 01:06:38,799 --> 01:06:42,960 over to you, Councelor Cole Hamilton. 1557 01:06:41,200 --> 01:06:45,599 » Yeah, great. Thanks very much, Mayor. I 1558 01:06:42,960 --> 01:06:49,599 think I'm uh having similar thoughts to 1559 01:06:45,599 --> 01:06:53,119 my colleagues. Um I I think that keeping 1560 01:06:49,599 --> 01:06:55,839 sort of uh the $6 million um unallocated 1561 01:06:53,119 --> 01:06:58,160 surplus uh level at least for now while 1562 01:06:55,839 --> 01:07:00,079 we um I know that over the course of the 1563 01:06:58,160 --> 01:07:02,160 next year we're going to get that uh 1564 01:07:00,079 --> 01:07:05,760 reserves and surplus policy that we've 1565 01:07:02,160 --> 01:07:08,319 been thinking about and that will be uh 1566 01:07:05,760 --> 01:07:10,400 allow us to have a much clearer sense I 1567 01:07:08,319 --> 01:07:12,640 think uh we or whoever sitting around 1568 01:07:10,400 --> 01:07:14,880 this table this time next year of where 1569 01:07:12,640 --> 01:07:17,920 where we stand. I do know that we've 1570 01:07:14,880 --> 01:07:19,839 increased our uh reserves considerably 1571 01:07:17,920 --> 01:07:22,400 uh over the course of this term through 1572 01:07:19,839 --> 01:07:24,319 things like the SIP the strategic 1573 01:07:22,400 --> 01:07:27,359 infrastructure investment program which 1574 01:07:24,319 --> 01:07:29,520 is increased by 1.5% every single year. 1575 01:07:27,359 --> 01:07:32,400 So things that a new council could 1576 01:07:29,520 --> 01:07:34,319 consider are um you know the 1577 01:07:32,400 --> 01:07:37,920 implementation of the SIP whether 1578 01:07:34,319 --> 01:07:40,319 there's any cause at any point for um 1579 01:07:37,920 --> 01:07:42,400 changing the rate of increase or anyway 1580 01:07:40,319 --> 01:07:44,480 so I think there there are uh places 1581 01:07:42,400 --> 01:07:47,039 where a future council can make their 1582 01:07:44,480 --> 01:07:49,920 own decisions as to and we'll have more 1583 01:07:47,039 --> 01:07:53,920 information in front of them and as for 1584 01:07:49,920 --> 01:07:56,160 now I'm comfortable with like like my 1585 01:07:53,920 --> 01:07:59,039 colleagues with the um something in the 1586 01:07:56,160 --> 01:08:00,640 six to 7% % range. Uh I'm not sure 1587 01:07:59,039 --> 01:08:03,039 depending on how soon the vote happens 1588 01:08:00,640 --> 01:08:04,880 whether I'll still be here online with 1589 01:08:03,039 --> 01:08:06,799 you at the end of it, but I appreciate 1590 01:08:04,880 --> 01:08:09,280 being able to share my perspective and 1591 01:08:06,799 --> 01:08:11,440 I'm glad to see that there seems to be a 1592 01:08:09,280 --> 01:08:13,359 fair amount of agreement among council. 1593 01:08:11,440 --> 01:08:15,200 This is a a wise balance that we've 1594 01:08:13,359 --> 01:08:17,839 struck here and appreciate staff 1595 01:08:15,200 --> 01:08:19,520 generating these uh these scenarios so 1596 01:08:17,839 --> 01:08:25,400 we could we could look them all through 1597 01:08:19,520 --> 01:08:25,400 carefully and um and it leaves a 1598 01:08:26,960 --> 01:08:31,600 you know, the numbers we see going 1599 01:08:28,400 --> 01:08:34,319 forward. Um, there are always rough 1600 01:08:31,600 --> 01:08:37,120 guesses and they I note that of course 1601 01:08:34,319 --> 01:08:38,799 that no unallocated surplus is included 1602 01:08:37,120 --> 01:08:41,600 in 1603 01:08:38,799 --> 01:08:44,239 them, but we do seem to consistently 1604 01:08:41,600 --> 01:08:47,279 have one. So that means that often the 1605 01:08:44,239 --> 01:08:50,159 uh the the scale of a future tax change 1606 01:08:47,279 --> 01:08:52,799 is not as um substantial as it might 1607 01:08:50,159 --> 01:08:55,600 initially seem uh when one's trying to 1608 01:08:52,799 --> 01:08:58,560 predict it say two years out. So, uh, 1609 01:08:55,600 --> 01:09:01,440 long long and short of it, I'm I'm 1610 01:08:58,560 --> 01:09:05,600 comfortable with a six to 7% increase, 1611 01:09:01,440 --> 01:09:09,279 uh, over this year. Um, and, uh, keeping 1612 01:09:05,600 --> 01:09:11,600 the six the roughly $6 million, um, 1613 01:09:09,279 --> 01:09:13,600 unallocated surplus for now while we, 1614 01:09:11,600 --> 01:09:15,520 uh, you know, complete that process of 1615 01:09:13,600 --> 01:09:16,640 looking at our reserves. And I know 1616 01:09:15,520 --> 01:09:18,880 there are others on council I think 1617 01:09:16,640 --> 01:09:20,880 particularly director mccll have had uh 1618 01:09:18,880 --> 01:09:23,920 better data on the way in which we've 1619 01:09:20,880 --> 01:09:26,560 increased uh our reserves over uh over 1620 01:09:23,920 --> 01:09:28,880 time but if if staff were maybe able to 1621 01:09:26,560 --> 01:09:31,199 uh answer that as a question like how 1622 01:09:28,880 --> 01:09:35,040 our total reserves have increased over 1623 01:09:31,199 --> 01:09:37,120 the course of this council from 2022 to 1624 01:09:35,040 --> 01:09:39,600 uh to the present if that's if those are 1625 01:09:37,120 --> 01:09:41,199 figures that they happen to have. So 1626 01:09:39,600 --> 01:09:44,159 I'll just pack that question on to the 1627 01:09:41,199 --> 01:09:46,480 end. Thank you. 1628 01:09:44,159 --> 01:09:48,480 Uh, thanks very much, uh, Councelor Cole 1629 01:09:46,480 --> 01:09:50,080 Hamilton, and and we did catch about 1630 01:09:48,480 --> 01:09:51,759 98.9% 1631 01:09:50,080 --> 01:09:53,520 of that. There was a couple little 1632 01:09:51,759 --> 01:09:55,760 hiccups in there, but I think we 1633 01:09:53,520 --> 01:09:57,840 definitely got the the the full gist of 1634 01:09:55,760 --> 01:10:00,400 of your comments, uh, including the 1635 01:09:57,840 --> 01:10:01,679 question in at the end there. Um, and 1636 01:10:00,400 --> 01:10:04,560 I'll maybe I'll pass it over to Mr. 1637 01:10:01,679 --> 01:10:07,679 Langmire, um, just so uh, either he can 1638 01:10:04,560 --> 01:10:09,679 clarify or I don't have the information 1639 01:10:07,679 --> 01:10:12,719 on the reserve changes over the last 1640 01:10:09,679 --> 01:10:14,719 four years on hand. Those will come back 1641 01:10:12,719 --> 01:10:18,320 with the reserve policy and it'll give a 1642 01:10:14,719 --> 01:10:20,880 nice clear picture that way. 1643 01:10:18,320 --> 01:10:23,679 » All right. Okay. Thanks for that. And 1644 01:10:20,880 --> 01:10:26,320 councelor McCullum. 1645 01:10:23,679 --> 01:10:29,040 » Yeah. Um, and this is something we can 1646 01:10:26,320 --> 01:10:32,320 maybe pick up in the next um, 1647 01:10:29,040 --> 01:10:34,320 discussion, but um, something that I was 1648 01:10:32,320 --> 01:10:36,400 wondering about and just kind of chewing 1649 01:10:34,320 --> 01:10:40,640 on these um, numbers, especially looking 1650 01:10:36,400 --> 01:10:43,679 forward is um, our contribution to the 1651 01:10:40,640 --> 01:10:45,840 SIP um, to address our infrastructure 1652 01:10:43,679 --> 01:10:47,760 gap. We've done some really good work on 1653 01:10:45,840 --> 01:10:50,480 that in the last couple of years and we 1654 01:10:47,760 --> 01:10:53,520 understand what the gap is in our 1655 01:10:50,480 --> 01:10:56,400 reserves and our our obligations to our 1656 01:10:53,520 --> 01:11:00,239 um fixed assets 1657 01:10:56,400 --> 01:11:04,480 and we are increasing that contribution 1658 01:11:00,239 --> 01:11:06,880 by a percentage every financial cycle. 1659 01:11:04,480 --> 01:11:09,120 Um but could you remind me how long it 1660 01:11:06,880 --> 01:11:12,480 will take for us to increase that until 1661 01:11:09,120 --> 01:11:14,960 we've um if anyone reme we can again 1662 01:11:12,480 --> 01:11:18,480 pick this up next time but um until that 1663 01:11:14,960 --> 01:11:20,560 that gap is kind of met with our our tax 1664 01:11:18,480 --> 01:11:23,120 contributions 1665 01:11:20,560 --> 01:11:25,360 » I believe from the um information was 1666 01:11:23,120 --> 01:11:28,239 about 10 or 11 years was the projection 1667 01:11:25,360 --> 01:11:30,400 at the time. 1668 01:11:28,239 --> 01:11:33,520 » Yeah. Based on what we know now. Yeah. 1669 01:11:30,400 --> 01:11:36,800 Um okay that's great. I I just wanted to 1670 01:11:33,520 --> 01:11:38,719 highlight that that is um you know a 1671 01:11:36,800 --> 01:11:42,880 decision that was made. It's it's sound 1672 01:11:38,719 --> 01:11:45,840 financial policy. It's um it's a it's 1673 01:11:42,880 --> 01:11:48,880 responsible decision- making, but um 1674 01:11:45,840 --> 01:11:51,120 it's also, you know, ambitious to make 1675 01:11:48,880 --> 01:11:53,760 up that gap that a lot of um 1676 01:11:51,120 --> 01:11:56,400 organizations are are basically ignoring 1677 01:11:53,760 --> 01:11:58,640 in a 10-year time span. So that is a 1678 01:11:56,400 --> 01:12:00,480 policy decision that future councils 1679 01:11:58,640 --> 01:12:03,280 could revisit and and change the 1680 01:12:00,480 --> 01:12:07,199 approach and lengthen that if if that's 1681 01:12:03,280 --> 01:12:08,960 the desire or um you know addressing 1682 01:12:07,199 --> 01:12:11,679 trying to smooth out some of these ups 1683 01:12:08,960 --> 01:12:15,120 and downs that that are inevitably in 1684 01:12:11,679 --> 01:12:16,560 front of us. Um yeah so I'll just leave 1685 01:12:15,120 --> 01:12:18,640 it at that. I just wanted to bring that 1686 01:12:16,560 --> 01:12:21,120 into the discussion. 1687 01:12:18,640 --> 01:12:22,000 » Thanks Councelor McCullum and Councelor 1688 01:12:21,120 --> 01:12:23,440 Fr. 1689 01:12:22,000 --> 01:12:26,080 » Yeah thanks again mayor. [clears throat] 1690 01:12:23,440 --> 01:12:28,159 Would you accept a motion at this time? 1691 01:12:26,080 --> 01:12:30,320 » Um, I don't see anybody getting any more 1692 01:12:28,159 --> 01:12:31,440 clarification. So, yeah. 1693 01:12:30,320 --> 01:12:34,159 » Thanks, Mayor. I'll I'll move that 1694 01:12:31,440 --> 01:12:37,040 council direct staff to prepare the 2026 1695 01:12:34,159 --> 01:12:39,679 to 2030 financial plan using a surplus 1696 01:12:37,040 --> 01:12:41,920 balance target of 15% of the 2025 1697 01:12:39,679 --> 01:12:43,679 general fund budgeted spending, 1698 01:12:41,920 --> 01:12:45,600 including tax funded capital and 1699 01:12:43,679 --> 01:12:47,840 excluding expenditures with specific 1700 01:12:45,600 --> 01:12:51,600 reserves. And the council directs staff 1701 01:12:47,840 --> 01:12:55,120 to prepare the 2026 to 20 2030 financial 1702 01:12:51,600 --> 01:12:58,159 plan using the 6% tax change scenario 1703 01:12:55,120 --> 01:13:02,800 for 2026 and that additional available 1704 01:12:58,159 --> 01:13:05,360 surplus be applied through 2027 to 2030. 1705 01:13:02,800 --> 01:13:06,800 » Second. 1706 01:13:05,360 --> 01:13:09,520 » Right. That's been moved and seconded. 1707 01:13:06,800 --> 01:13:13,040 Are there any questions or comments on 1708 01:13:09,520 --> 01:13:14,880 the motion on the floor? 1709 01:13:13,040 --> 01:13:16,880 Um, I'll maybe just make make the 1710 01:13:14,880 --> 01:13:18,560 comment that I think I've made uh pretty 1711 01:13:16,880 --> 01:13:21,360 much every year when we've gotten to 1712 01:13:18,560 --> 01:13:24,239 budget time and and that kind of talks 1713 01:13:21,360 --> 01:13:26,400 about that bow wave and um the the fact 1714 01:13:24,239 --> 01:13:27,840 that the less we do this year, the the 1715 01:13:26,400 --> 01:13:30,320 more that's going to be next year and 1716 01:13:27,840 --> 01:13:33,760 and I think we've seen that uh time and 1717 01:13:30,320 --> 01:13:37,840 time again and and so um uh again uh 1718 01:13:33,760 --> 01:13:41,199 looking forward to that reserve and um 1719 01:13:37,840 --> 01:13:43,040 surplus policy coming back uh to give us 1720 01:13:41,199 --> 01:13:45,199 another tool in the toolbox. So, so 1721 01:13:43,040 --> 01:13:47,040 we're able to really contemplate that 1722 01:13:45,199 --> 01:13:48,719 stuff and and make sure that we're 1723 01:13:47,040 --> 01:13:52,159 leaving things as healthy as possible 1724 01:13:48,719 --> 01:13:55,360 for uh the uh the council after the next 1725 01:13:52,159 --> 01:13:56,640 term. So, um that being said, I still 1726 01:13:55,360 --> 01:13:58,480 don't see any further questions or 1727 01:13:56,640 --> 01:14:00,800 comments. So, I'll call the question. 1728 01:13:58,480 --> 01:14:02,719 All those in favor? 1729 01:14:00,800 --> 01:14:05,679 Any opposed? 1730 01:14:02,719 --> 01:14:08,080 And motion carries. 1731 01:14:05,679 --> 01:14:10,400 Um all right, moving on to lease 1732 01:14:08,080 --> 01:14:13,040 renewals for the Courtney Air Park. U 1733 01:14:10,400 --> 01:14:18,800 lease lots 2 to four commercial hangers 1734 01:14:13,040 --> 01:14:20,960 uh 6.12 and I'll pass it over to um Mr. 1735 01:14:18,800 --> 01:14:22,800 Garb 1736 01:14:20,960 --> 01:14:24,400 through the mayor. Um Scott Haynesworth 1737 01:14:22,800 --> 01:14:28,880 is going to give an introduction of this 1738 01:14:24,400 --> 01:14:31,520 report and it's covering um 1739 01:14:28,880 --> 01:14:33,040 four of the five commercial leases, 1740 01:14:31,520 --> 01:14:36,679 sorry, three of the four commercial 1741 01:14:33,040 --> 01:14:36,679 leases at the airport. 1742 01:14:36,800 --> 01:14:40,480 » Thank you, Jeff. uh through the city 1743 01:14:38,640 --> 01:14:41,920 manager, mayor and councel. Uh this 1744 01:14:40,480 --> 01:14:43,920 report is before you to consider the 1745 01:14:41,920 --> 01:14:45,679 renewal of three existing ground leases 1746 01:14:43,920 --> 01:14:48,000 at the Courtney Air Park, specifically 1747 01:14:45,679 --> 01:14:52,159 lease lots 2, three, and four, all of 1748 01:14:48,000 --> 01:14:54,560 which expired on December 31st, 2025. 1749 01:14:52,159 --> 01:14:56,640 The leases relate to existing commercial 1750 01:14:54,560 --> 01:14:59,360 hangers and aviation uses that are 1751 01:14:56,640 --> 01:15:01,120 already uh established on site. In each 1752 01:14:59,360 --> 01:15:02,640 case, the tenant owns the building 1753 01:15:01,120 --> 01:15:04,719 improvements and is requesting to 1754 01:15:02,640 --> 01:15:07,520 exercise the first renewal term provided 1755 01:15:04,719 --> 01:15:08,960 under the original lease agreements. The 1756 01:15:07,520 --> 01:15:11,920 proposed renewals are for a further 1757 01:15:08,960 --> 01:15:14,719 5-year term from January 1st, 2026, uh, 1758 01:15:11,920 --> 01:15:16,560 running until December 31st, 2030 with 1759 01:15:14,719 --> 01:15:18,320 two additional 5-year renewal options 1760 01:15:16,560 --> 01:15:19,920 remaining, each subject to council 1761 01:15:18,320 --> 01:15:21,679 approval. 1762 01:15:19,920 --> 01:15:23,920 An independent fair market rental 1763 01:15:21,679 --> 01:15:26,480 appraisal was completed in November 2025 1764 01:15:23,920 --> 01:15:28,480 to support the renewals. The appraisal 1765 01:15:26,480 --> 01:15:30,640 confirms that the proposed rents meet or 1766 01:15:28,480 --> 01:15:33,199 exceed minimum market benchmarks based 1767 01:15:30,640 --> 01:15:36,000 on existing zoning, land use controls, 1768 01:15:33,199 --> 01:15:38,560 and aviation related use restrictions 1769 01:15:36,000 --> 01:15:40,400 included in the leases. 1770 01:15:38,560 --> 01:15:42,239 Annual rents will continue to escalate 1771 01:15:40,400 --> 01:15:43,280 at 4 and a.5% consistent with the 1772 01:15:42,239 --> 01:15:44,719 structure in the original lease 1773 01:15:43,280 --> 01:15:46,400 agreements. I'll also note that the 1774 01:15:44,719 --> 01:15:50,080 proposed lease rates are approximately 1775 01:15:46,400 --> 01:15:51,679 45% higher than the 2025 lease rates. A 1776 01:15:50,080 --> 01:15:53,040 notice that this position was issued in 1777 01:15:51,679 --> 01:15:55,440 accordance with the community charter 1778 01:15:53,040 --> 01:15:56,719 and no public feedback was received. Uh 1779 01:15:55,440 --> 01:15:58,320 staff are therefore recommending 1780 01:15:56,719 --> 01:16:00,159 approval of the lease renewals as 1781 01:15:58,320 --> 01:16:02,800 presented. Be happy to take any 1782 01:16:00,159 --> 01:16:05,120 questions. 1783 01:16:02,800 --> 01:16:09,000 Right. Thanks very much uh for that. Are 1784 01:16:05,120 --> 01:16:09,000 there any questions or comments? 1785 01:16:09,520 --> 01:16:12,400 Right. 1786 01:16:11,040 --> 01:16:14,080 » Any questions, comments on the 1787 01:16:12,400 --> 01:16:17,600 recommendations on the floor? Seeing 1788 01:16:14,080 --> 01:16:21,040 none. All those in favor? Any opposed? 1789 01:16:17,600 --> 01:16:21,040 And motion carries. 1790 01:16:21,120 --> 01:16:25,280 and we'll move on to operational 1791 01:16:22,800 --> 01:16:29,040 services CBRD water south extension 1792 01:16:25,280 --> 01:16:30,880 project uh project approval and pass it 1793 01:16:29,040 --> 01:16:32,320 over to Mr. Garvin again. 1794 01:16:30,880 --> 01:16:35,280 » Thank you through the mayor and council. 1795 01:16:32,320 --> 01:16:37,520 It's a really important uh uh project 1796 01:16:35,280 --> 01:16:40,000 where we're sharing in infrastructure 1797 01:16:37,520 --> 01:16:43,840 with both CVRD 1798 01:16:40,000 --> 01:16:45,360 uh and Komox First Nation Council um 1799 01:16:43,840 --> 01:16:48,560 confirmed the partnership on this 1800 01:16:45,360 --> 01:16:51,440 project uh with a public statement uh in 1801 01:16:48,560 --> 01:16:53,120 a past council meeting and Mr. Shaw is 1802 01:16:51,440 --> 01:16:55,600 going to give an overview and we have 1803 01:16:53,120 --> 01:16:57,520 staff from the CVRD have joined us uh as 1804 01:16:55,600 --> 01:16:59,199 partners in this project. Over to you 1805 01:16:57,520 --> 01:17:01,120 Mr. Shaw. 1806 01:16:59,199 --> 01:17:02,480 » Thank you Mr. Garbot. Uh good evening 1807 01:17:01,120 --> 01:17:04,719 through the mayor to council. I'm 1808 01:17:02,480 --> 01:17:06,400 pleased to present the water south 1809 01:17:04,719 --> 01:17:08,239 extension project project approval 1810 01:17:06,400 --> 01:17:10,159 report. Really a cover report for the 1811 01:17:08,239 --> 01:17:12,320 bylaws that the CBRD has submitted on 1812 01:17:10,159 --> 01:17:14,800 behalf of the service. Uh and before I 1813 01:17:12,320 --> 01:17:16,400 begin as Mr. Garin articulated uh we I'd 1814 01:17:14,800 --> 01:17:17,760 like to acknowledge and introduce u a 1815 01:17:16,400 --> 01:17:19,440 few members from the Comox Valley 1816 01:17:17,760 --> 01:17:22,239 Regional District who played a critical 1817 01:17:19,440 --> 01:17:24,000 role in developing this initiative. So 1818 01:17:22,239 --> 01:17:25,360 please join me in welcoming Mr. Charlie 1819 01:17:24,000 --> 01:17:27,520 Gore the senior manager of capital 1820 01:17:25,360 --> 01:17:29,199 project delivery. Uh Jake Martins the 1821 01:17:27,520 --> 01:17:31,120 general manager of corporate services. 1822 01:17:29,199 --> 01:17:32,640 um their expertise and collaboration has 1823 01:17:31,120 --> 01:17:35,520 been instrumental in bringing this 1824 01:17:32,640 --> 01:17:37,120 project to its current stage and I'm 1825 01:17:35,520 --> 01:17:38,640 glad to see them here today to support 1826 01:17:37,120 --> 01:17:40,719 the discussion. So if council has any 1827 01:17:38,640 --> 01:17:43,199 questions for them feel free to ask. Um 1828 01:17:40,719 --> 01:17:45,440 but just briefly uh the water south 1829 01:17:43,199 --> 01:17:47,280 extension project is a transformative 1830 01:17:45,440 --> 01:17:49,199 regional infrastructure project led by 1831 01:17:47,280 --> 01:17:51,920 the Komox Valley Regional District in 1832 01:17:49,199 --> 01:17:54,320 partnership with Komox First Nation and 1833 01:17:51,920 --> 01:17:56,000 the Royston water local service area 1834 01:17:54,320 --> 01:17:58,000 with the participant being the city of 1835 01:17:56,000 --> 01:17:59,760 Kourtney. Uh the project itself will 1836 01:17:58,000 --> 01:18:01,840 extend water transmission infrastructure 1837 01:17:59,760 --> 01:18:04,960 south of Courtney supporting treaty 1838 01:18:01,840 --> 01:18:06,960 lands uh Royston uh key growth areas in 1839 01:18:04,960 --> 01:18:08,880 South Courtney and this investment is 1840 01:18:06,960 --> 01:18:11,600 foundational to the city's long-term 1841 01:18:08,880 --> 01:18:13,840 growth strategy ensuring reliable water 1842 01:18:11,600 --> 01:18:15,760 services for our future both for 1843 01:18:13,840 --> 01:18:18,000 development and as well as aligning with 1844 01:18:15,760 --> 01:18:20,320 the city's water master plan for future 1845 01:18:18,000 --> 01:18:22,719 growth. Uh governance for this project 1846 01:18:20,320 --> 01:18:24,960 is anchored in two CBRD bylaws that are 1847 01:18:22,719 --> 01:18:28,880 here for you today. both bylaw number 1848 01:18:24,960 --> 01:18:30,960 897, the establishment bylaw, and 898, 1849 01:18:28,880 --> 01:18:32,480 the loan authorization bylaw, which are 1850 01:18:30,960 --> 01:18:35,520 both here in front of council for 1851 01:18:32,480 --> 01:18:37,840 council consent. Um, council support 1852 01:18:35,520 --> 01:18:39,840 today will enable the timely delivery 1853 01:18:37,840 --> 01:18:41,440 deliver sorry, delivery and advancement 1854 01:18:39,840 --> 01:18:44,159 of the strategic initiative in this 1855 01:18:41,440 --> 01:18:46,159 project as the project aims to support a 1856 01:18:44,159 --> 01:18:48,640 sustainable development, economic 1857 01:18:46,159 --> 01:18:51,679 growth, and regional collaboration while 1858 01:18:48,640 --> 01:18:54,080 positioning the city for future success. 1859 01:18:51,679 --> 01:18:56,159 In terms of timelines and next steps, uh 1860 01:18:54,080 --> 01:18:58,880 timely consent is essential for the 1861 01:18:56,159 --> 01:19:00,800 project to move forward. Uh continue and 1862 01:18:58,880 --> 01:19:02,960 maintain momentum for the project and 1863 01:19:00,800 --> 01:19:05,280 meet grant funding deadlines. So key 1864 01:19:02,960 --> 01:19:08,800 milestones are obviously consent of the 1865 01:19:05,280 --> 01:19:10,640 bylaws today in January. post consent. 1866 01:19:08,800 --> 01:19:11,840 Uh the province uh the submissions to 1867 01:19:10,640 --> 01:19:13,679 the province for the bylaws for 1868 01:19:11,840 --> 01:19:15,440 adoptions will be in March or March at 1869 01:19:13,679 --> 01:19:17,760 the latest with tendering and 1870 01:19:15,440 --> 01:19:19,760 construction phases through the fall of 1871 01:19:17,760 --> 01:19:22,159 2026 and construction till the end of 1872 01:19:19,760 --> 01:19:24,400 March of 2028. 1873 01:19:22,159 --> 01:19:26,000 So the recommendation before you today 1874 01:19:24,400 --> 01:19:27,840 is to staff recommend that council 1875 01:19:26,000 --> 01:19:31,920 consent to support the bylaws, both 1876 01:19:27,840 --> 01:19:33,679 bylaw number 897 and bylaw 898, and 1877 01:19:31,920 --> 01:19:35,199 authorize the city manager to finalize 1878 01:19:33,679 --> 01:19:37,360 and execute the project agreement 1879 01:19:35,199 --> 01:19:39,679 between the city and the CVRD and direct 1880 01:19:37,360 --> 01:19:42,000 staff to take all necessary steps to 1881 01:19:39,679 --> 01:19:44,000 advance this initiative. With that, I'm 1882 01:19:42,000 --> 01:19:45,840 happy to take any questions. 1883 01:19:44,000 --> 01:19:48,000 » Excellent. Thanks very much for that. 1884 01:19:45,840 --> 01:19:51,600 And looking to council if there's any 1885 01:19:48,000 --> 01:19:54,719 questions or comments. Um, 1886 01:19:51,600 --> 01:19:57,600 council mak. 1887 01:19:54,719 --> 01:20:00,320 » Yeah, the thanks for the report. I It's 1888 01:19:57,600 --> 01:20:02,080 good news um seeing this move ahead. I 1889 01:20:00,320 --> 01:20:05,120 It's very important project for our 1890 01:20:02,080 --> 01:20:07,440 region. Um, 1891 01:20:05,120 --> 01:20:09,679 one question I had just um in the 1892 01:20:07,440 --> 01:20:13,679 financial implications section of the 1893 01:20:09,679 --> 01:20:15,120 report. Um when we've uh reviewed this 1894 01:20:13,679 --> 01:20:17,360 project in the past, we've kind of 1895 01:20:15,120 --> 01:20:21,760 talked about um you know the city's 1896 01:20:17,360 --> 01:20:23,920 benefit um how we are aortioning um our 1897 01:20:21,760 --> 01:20:27,920 financial commitment 1898 01:20:23,920 --> 01:20:33,040 and um but something that we haven't 1899 01:20:27,920 --> 01:20:37,679 discussed is um like how how that how 1900 01:20:33,040 --> 01:20:40,719 those funds are being collected and um 1901 01:20:37,679 --> 01:20:43,040 I I guess my assumption had And a big 1902 01:20:40,719 --> 01:20:44,880 portion of this would be through DCC's 1903 01:20:43,040 --> 01:20:48,239 um because it's my understanding that 1904 01:20:44,880 --> 01:20:50,400 the main driver for this is to support 1905 01:20:48,239 --> 01:20:53,360 new development. 1906 01:20:50,400 --> 01:20:56,000 And um in reading this it it says that 1907 01:20:53,360 --> 01:20:58,080 75% of this cost will be allocated to 1908 01:20:56,000 --> 01:20:59,679 residential customers. I I'm assuming 1909 01:20:58,080 --> 01:21:02,080 the other 25 is just simply 1910 01:20:59,679 --> 01:21:05,760 non-residential, but there's no 1911 01:21:02,080 --> 01:21:08,239 indication of exactly um how like the 1912 01:21:05,760 --> 01:21:11,840 source of these funds. Is this um a 1913 01:21:08,239 --> 01:21:14,960 straight addition to uh the water 1914 01:21:11,840 --> 01:21:17,440 service requisition or are there DCC's 1915 01:21:14,960 --> 01:21:19,199 um coming in to fund this or um just 1916 01:21:17,440 --> 01:21:21,120 some better information there would be 1917 01:21:19,199 --> 01:21:22,080 helpful. 1918 01:21:21,120 --> 01:21:23,520 » Yeah, thank you for that through the 1919 01:21:22,080 --> 01:21:25,760 mayor to councelor McCullum. Fair 1920 01:21:23,520 --> 01:21:27,199 question. Um ran some very preliminary 1921 01:21:25,760 --> 01:21:28,719 numbers. You'll see that the cost 1922 01:21:27,199 --> 01:21:31,199 estimates are based on a 20-year 1923 01:21:28,719 --> 01:21:33,679 amortization with a 5% over the customer 1924 01:21:31,199 --> 01:21:36,960 base that exists today. No dcc 1925 01:21:33,679 --> 01:21:39,440 considerations for that. um and it it 1926 01:21:36,960 --> 01:21:41,199 would be attributed to the water fee and 1927 01:21:39,440 --> 01:21:42,480 then requisitioned by the CVR through 1928 01:21:41,199 --> 01:21:43,920 the city. So the city would collect 1929 01:21:42,480 --> 01:21:45,440 through fees and charges and then 1930 01:21:43,920 --> 01:21:47,600 requisition the amount for debt 1931 01:21:45,440 --> 01:21:50,719 servicing back to the CVRD over the 1932 01:21:47,600 --> 01:21:53,360 amortization period that was selected. 1933 01:21:50,719 --> 01:21:55,360 So, 1934 01:21:53,360 --> 01:21:56,800 so in terms of that additional cost 1935 01:21:55,360 --> 01:21:59,040 because that's basically an additional 1936 01:21:56,800 --> 01:22:01,840 cost to all the households in the ser 1937 01:21:59,040 --> 01:22:04,960 like in the city of Courtney um to 1938 01:22:01,840 --> 01:22:08,239 receive or to support this project. And 1939 01:22:04,960 --> 01:22:10,480 what is the benefit then to um existing 1940 01:22:08,239 --> 01:22:12,960 users for that additional fee? I think 1941 01:22:10,480 --> 01:22:14,960 that's important for us to understand. 1942 01:22:12,960 --> 01:22:17,040 » That's a great question. So uh the 1943 01:22:14,960 --> 01:22:18,719 transmission project in and of itself um 1944 01:22:17,040 --> 01:22:21,520 transverses uh through the Ardan 1945 01:22:18,719 --> 01:22:22,719 corridor uh and across um the Ministry 1946 01:22:21,520 --> 01:22:24,560 of Jurisdiction all the way to the 1947 01:22:22,719 --> 01:22:26,159 boundary past the ridge development. 1948 01:22:24,560 --> 01:22:28,400 There's a number of tie-in connection 1949 01:22:26,159 --> 01:22:31,199 points within the city and the existing 1950 01:22:28,400 --> 01:22:32,960 zone. So the 87 meter zone on the West 1951 01:22:31,199 --> 01:22:35,199 Courtney side which services a large 1952 01:22:32,960 --> 01:22:37,280 vast majority of our customer base would 1953 01:22:35,199 --> 01:22:38,639 see a fire suppression enhancement 1954 01:22:37,280 --> 01:22:40,400 opportunity through its connection to 1955 01:22:38,639 --> 01:22:43,040 the CVRD main at that particular 1956 01:22:40,400 --> 01:22:46,000 location as well as disconnecting some 1957 01:22:43,040 --> 01:22:49,280 of the existing customers that rely on 1958 01:22:46,000 --> 01:22:51,679 um other systems that the CVRD support. 1959 01:22:49,280 --> 01:22:53,280 uh so local service areas or the Marsden 1960 01:22:51,679 --> 01:22:55,280 zone, disconnect those and put them back 1961 01:22:53,280 --> 01:22:57,440 onto the 87. So they'd be truly serviced 1962 01:22:55,280 --> 01:22:59,440 through the city's infrastructure as 1963 01:22:57,440 --> 01:23:02,880 well as providing secondary support for 1964 01:22:59,440 --> 01:23:04,320 fire and water um to the uh ridge 1965 01:23:02,880 --> 01:23:06,560 subdivision which is currently through 1966 01:23:04,320 --> 01:23:08,239 the temporary booster station. So that 1967 01:23:06,560 --> 01:23:10,239 would provide a singular secondary 1968 01:23:08,239 --> 01:23:12,560 source and primary flow to that existing 1969 01:23:10,239 --> 01:23:14,320 area as well as introduce water an 1970 01:23:12,560 --> 01:23:16,080 opportunity for water at a higher 1971 01:23:14,320 --> 01:23:18,000 velocity and fire flow for the Christy 1972 01:23:16,080 --> 01:23:19,440 Parkway which already uh exists within 1973 01:23:18,000 --> 01:23:21,040 our community. So there's a number of 1974 01:23:19,440 --> 01:23:22,639 connection points and a number of 1975 01:23:21,040 --> 01:23:24,800 benefits to the existing community, but 1976 01:23:22,639 --> 01:23:26,800 also provides the opportunity for the 1977 01:23:24,800 --> 01:23:28,560 continuation of growth within those 1978 01:23:26,800 --> 01:23:30,719 areas that otherwise would be limited 1979 01:23:28,560 --> 01:23:32,400 without 1980 01:23:30,719 --> 01:23:35,040 » That's that's really helpful. Thanks. 1981 01:23:32,400 --> 01:23:37,520 And so just for clarity, 75% of the cost 1982 01:23:35,040 --> 01:23:40,159 is residential and the rest is business 1983 01:23:37,520 --> 01:23:41,280 and industry. Is that is that what the 1984 01:23:40,159 --> 01:23:42,960 implication is? 1985 01:23:41,280 --> 01:23:45,280 » Sorry. Yes. Correct. Yeah. The breakdown 1986 01:23:42,960 --> 01:23:47,920 currently is roughly between 75 just 1987 01:23:45,280 --> 01:23:49,520 over 75% residential to ICI in terms of 1988 01:23:47,920 --> 01:23:51,840 the makeup and so that's what I used to 1989 01:23:49,520 --> 01:23:53,440 build to build the foundation of of this 1990 01:23:51,840 --> 01:23:55,280 cost estimate. 1991 01:23:53,440 --> 01:23:57,440 » Thank you. 1992 01:23:55,280 --> 01:23:58,400 » Thanks councelor McCullum and councelor 1993 01:23:57,440 --> 01:24:01,600 Fr. 1994 01:23:58,400 --> 01:24:04,080 » Yeah, thanks again mayor. Um and in my 1995 01:24:01,600 --> 01:24:06,159 recollection of this project I thought 1996 01:24:04,080 --> 01:24:07,840 there was an opportunity for an active 1997 01:24:06,159 --> 01:24:11,120 transportation corridor but maybe you 1998 01:24:07,840 --> 01:24:12,719 can uh just bring me up to speed. Is the 1999 01:24:11,120 --> 01:24:15,199 transmission line is that going to be 2000 01:24:12,719 --> 01:24:17,360 like fully publicly owned property or is 2001 01:24:15,199 --> 01:24:18,880 is there some other scenario for that 2002 01:24:17,360 --> 01:24:21,280 and is there an opportunity for an 2003 01:24:18,880 --> 01:24:22,560 active transportation corridor along it? 2004 01:24:21,280 --> 01:24:24,159 It's a great question. Thank you to the 2005 01:24:22,560 --> 01:24:25,760 mayor. It's councelor Frish. Um so it 2006 01:24:24,159 --> 01:24:27,280 has been contemplated as a part of this 2007 01:24:25,760 --> 01:24:29,199 project as it runs through the Ardan 2008 01:24:27,280 --> 01:24:31,360 corridor and through the Komox uh 2009 01:24:29,199 --> 01:24:33,840 logging road where practicable and 2010 01:24:31,360 --> 01:24:35,760 ability within the corridor um 2011 01:24:33,840 --> 01:24:37,600 cross-section there's an allowance for 2012 01:24:35,760 --> 01:24:39,199 the road to be constructed in such a way 2013 01:24:37,600 --> 01:24:40,960 that would support active transportation 2014 01:24:39,199 --> 01:24:43,120 or shoulder widening for future 2015 01:24:40,960 --> 01:24:45,199 consideration of active transportation. 2016 01:24:43,120 --> 01:24:47,840 We're seeking to work with the CBRD to 2017 01:24:45,199 --> 01:24:50,239 have those pieces um built into the 2018 01:24:47,840 --> 01:24:52,800 overall delivery of the project. Um, so 2019 01:24:50,239 --> 01:24:54,719 it's not necessarily of a built to a 2020 01:24:52,800 --> 01:24:56,800 completeness, but built it to a place 2021 01:24:54,719 --> 01:24:58,960 where the corridor is then restored to a 2022 01:24:56,800 --> 01:25:00,400 means which would provide the city the 2023 01:24:58,960 --> 01:25:02,159 opportunity to build the active 2024 01:25:00,400 --> 01:25:04,800 transportation corridor uh throughout 2025 01:25:02,159 --> 01:25:07,280 its entirety. As we move past some of 2026 01:25:04,800 --> 01:25:08,880 the undeveloped lands that are beyond um 2027 01:25:07,280 --> 01:25:10,880 the ridge development, as this 2028 01:25:08,880 --> 01:25:12,800 transmission ma main continues on, 2029 01:25:10,880 --> 01:25:14,800 there'll be some clearing and removal of 2030 01:25:12,800 --> 01:25:16,560 materials in order to facilitate the 2031 01:25:14,800 --> 01:25:18,320 installation. And so where again 2032 01:25:16,560 --> 01:25:20,000 practical and opportunity exists for 2033 01:25:18,320 --> 01:25:22,800 active transportation to continue along 2034 01:25:20,000 --> 01:25:25,040 that corridor. Uh the reconstruction of 2035 01:25:22,800 --> 01:25:27,280 the the the earthworks in that area will 2036 01:25:25,040 --> 01:25:30,000 be to suit that of actual transportation 2037 01:25:27,280 --> 01:25:31,920 or a multi-use path under the parameters 2038 01:25:30,000 --> 01:25:33,679 of our existing SDS bylaw. 2039 01:25:31,920 --> 01:25:35,520 » Right. And and the logging the logging 2040 01:25:33,679 --> 01:25:37,120 road that it's using is that is that the 2041 01:25:35,520 --> 01:25:38,800 really old one that's just beyond the 2042 01:25:37,120 --> 01:25:40,639 connector that connects the ridge. 2043 01:25:38,800 --> 01:25:41,840 Right. That the one that's expensive to 2044 01:25:40,639 --> 01:25:42,159 fix and we haven't done 2045 01:25:41,840 --> 01:25:43,840 » Yeah. 2046 01:25:42,159 --> 01:25:45,280 » Yeah. That's the one. Okay. So, that's 2047 01:25:43,840 --> 01:25:49,040 going to be expensive no matter what. 2048 01:25:45,280 --> 01:25:51,040 Um, and then does it cross the um the 2049 01:25:49,040 --> 01:25:52,880 river? I'm I'm totally lost on the name 2050 01:25:51,040 --> 01:25:54,800 of the river. You know the one I mean, 2051 01:25:52,880 --> 01:25:57,360 thank you. The Trent is actually what I 2052 01:25:54,800 --> 01:25:58,159 was thinking. Does it cross Trent? 2053 01:25:57,360 --> 01:26:00,800 » Uh, yes. 2054 01:25:58,159 --> 01:26:03,040 » Yeah. How does it cross the Trent? 2055 01:26:00,800 --> 01:26:05,199 » It'll be in the road crosssection. Okay. 2056 01:26:03,040 --> 01:26:08,199 » Y thanks. Thanks for the 2057 01:26:05,199 --> 01:26:08,199 » Sure. 2058 01:26:09,120 --> 01:26:12,159 recommendations. 2059 01:26:10,719 --> 01:26:14,320 » All right. It's been moved and seconded. 2060 01:26:12,159 --> 01:26:17,199 Any further questions or comments? 2061 01:26:14,320 --> 01:26:20,320 Seeing none, all those in favor? Any 2062 01:26:17,199 --> 01:26:24,239 opposed? And motion carries. 2063 01:26:20,320 --> 01:26:27,440 We'll move into um 6.2.2 solid waste 2064 01:26:24,239 --> 01:26:30,560 contamination uh update. And I'll pass 2065 01:26:27,440 --> 01:26:33,040 it over to 2066 01:26:30,560 --> 01:26:38,600 Chris Thompson. [clears throat] 2067 01:26:33,040 --> 01:26:38,600 Mr. Thompson. Oh, you need the clicker. 2068 01:26:39,520 --> 01:26:44,560 » Oh, and Mr. Garvis got a comment. Yeah, 2069 01:26:41,679 --> 01:26:47,040 thanks. Um, thank you, Mayor Council. 2070 01:26:44,560 --> 01:26:49,440 Uh, we received an update um, from the 2071 01:26:47,040 --> 01:26:50,960 solidway staff at the region. Uh, we 2072 01:26:49,440 --> 01:26:53,040 have a good partnership working towards 2073 01:26:50,960 --> 01:26:55,679 there and I asked operational services 2074 01:26:53,040 --> 01:26:57,920 staff to uh, give uh, council a little 2075 01:26:55,679 --> 01:27:01,280 bit more information. Uh, the launch of 2076 01:26:57,920 --> 01:27:02,880 our uh, cart program, organics diversion 2077 01:27:01,280 --> 01:27:04,239 and recycling has gone really really 2078 01:27:02,880 --> 01:27:06,000 well. And I think it's really important 2079 01:27:04,239 --> 01:27:08,960 for council to understand uh how 2080 01:27:06,000 --> 01:27:10,880 effective this program's been uh as it's 2081 01:27:08,960 --> 01:27:13,280 um you know it's a it's a huge component 2082 01:27:10,880 --> 01:27:16,880 of uh work that happened under council's 2083 01:27:13,280 --> 01:27:18,719 direction uh last year. So thanks Mr. 2084 01:27:16,880 --> 01:27:20,800 Thompson. 2085 01:27:18,719 --> 01:27:24,960 » Thank you the CEO to the mayor and 2086 01:27:20,800 --> 01:27:27,920 council. Um appreciate the preamble. Um 2087 01:27:24,960 --> 01:27:30,480 yeah so in October uh staff from KMAC 2088 01:27:27,920 --> 01:27:32,080 Strath Kona Waste Management um 2089 01:27:30,480 --> 01:27:35,199 presented this solid waste management 2090 01:27:32,080 --> 01:27:37,199 plan update. This plan updates the or 2091 01:27:35,199 --> 01:27:40,320 outlines long-term strategies for 2092 01:27:37,199 --> 01:27:42,400 garbage, recycling, and organics. Uh, 2093 01:27:40,320 --> 01:27:44,080 and it update or it outlines several 2094 01:27:42,400 --> 01:27:46,159 strategies to focus on waste reduction 2095 01:27:44,080 --> 01:27:48,719 and diversion, including supporting 2096 01:27:46,159 --> 01:27:50,320 multif family waste separation, reducing 2097 01:27:48,719 --> 01:27:53,760 industrial and construction waste, and 2098 01:27:50,320 --> 01:27:55,840 equalizing access to services. Uh, a 2099 01:27:53,760 --> 01:27:58,239 significant portion of the solid waste 2100 01:27:55,840 --> 01:28:00,400 management plan is a waste composition 2101 01:27:58,239 --> 01:28:03,600 study, which takes samples of waste from 2102 01:28:00,400 --> 01:28:05,120 different communities. um and provides 2103 01:28:03,600 --> 01:28:06,800 insights into the components as a 2104 01:28:05,120 --> 01:28:09,040 snapshot in time. So it's like a waste 2105 01:28:06,800 --> 01:28:10,480 audit. This report and presentation 2106 01:28:09,040 --> 01:28:12,000 reviews the perform the city's 2107 01:28:10,480 --> 01:28:16,560 performance in comparison to other 2108 01:28:12,000 --> 01:28:19,920 municipalities in the uh CSWM service. 2109 01:28:16,560 --> 01:28:21,840 So uh I believe this is this chart's 2110 01:28:19,920 --> 01:28:23,600 been shown before and it really 2111 01:28:21,840 --> 01:28:27,679 highlights some of the successes of the 2112 01:28:23,600 --> 01:28:29,280 automated uh transition. So in 2024 2113 01:28:27,679 --> 01:28:31,600 along with automated we switched to 2114 01:28:29,280 --> 01:28:35,280 bi-weekly garbage collection and we saw 2115 01:28:31,600 --> 01:28:39,199 38% reduction in garbage tonnage and a 2116 01:28:35,280 --> 01:28:42,239 49% increase in organics tonnage. Uh so 2117 01:28:39,199 --> 01:28:44,560 the the ratio of organics tonnage to 2118 01:28:42,239 --> 01:28:46,159 garbage is 2.17 2119 01:28:44,560 --> 01:28:48,960 which makes the city of Courtney a 2120 01:28:46,159 --> 01:28:51,440 regional leader in in diverting waste 2121 01:28:48,960 --> 01:28:53,600 away from the landfill uh specifically 2122 01:28:51,440 --> 01:28:56,719 through the curbside collection service. 2123 01:28:53,600 --> 01:28:57,840 So, uh, we've actually met our, uh, if 2124 01:28:56,719 --> 01:28:59,120 you just look at that curbside 2125 01:28:57,840 --> 01:29:01,520 collection service, we've met our 2126 01:28:59,120 --> 01:29:04,880 obligation, uh, to to to meet that 2127 01:29:01,520 --> 01:29:08,880 provincial target of, uh, 350 kg per 2128 01:29:04,880 --> 01:29:11,040 person annually. Uh, the 2025 numbers 2129 01:29:08,880 --> 01:29:14,080 for tonnage are in, they've arrived and 2130 01:29:11,040 --> 01:29:16,239 we are on the same pace as 2024. So, it 2131 01:29:14,080 --> 01:29:18,080 wasn't just a novelty of uh, the 2132 01:29:16,239 --> 01:29:20,239 automated collection. That's that's 2133 01:29:18,080 --> 01:29:22,560 truly what uh, our residents are doing. 2134 01:29:20,239 --> 01:29:24,639 So, that's fantastic. 2135 01:29:22,560 --> 01:29:27,600 Um this chart here is from the waste 2136 01:29:24,639 --> 01:29:30,400 composition study and in the sample that 2137 01:29:27,600 --> 01:29:33,280 was collected courtney garbage contains 2138 01:29:30,400 --> 01:29:34,960 20% compostable organics. So that was 2139 01:29:33,280 --> 01:29:37,760 one of the numbers that the staff member 2140 01:29:34,960 --> 01:29:39,360 from the CSWN reported. Uh this is 2141 01:29:37,760 --> 01:29:43,360 significant and provides an area of 2142 01:29:39,360 --> 01:29:45,520 focus for staff to reduce uh to reduce 2143 01:29:43,360 --> 01:29:47,440 in 2026 through education about the 2144 01:29:45,520 --> 01:29:49,360 organics diversion potential. It's 2145 01:29:47,440 --> 01:29:53,280 important to compare us to other 2146 01:29:49,360 --> 01:29:55,840 municipalities. So Komox is at 19%. 2147 01:29:53,280 --> 01:29:58,320 Campbell River is actually at 35% and 2148 01:29:55,840 --> 01:30:01,120 let's say they're pre-automated. So 2149 01:29:58,320 --> 01:30:03,920 that's coming uh in 2026, I believe. And 2150 01:30:01,120 --> 01:30:05,679 Cumberland's at 24%. So we're actually 2151 01:30:03,920 --> 01:30:07,760 we're not doing too bad when we compare 2152 01:30:05,679 --> 01:30:09,520 ourselves. Um however, there is an 2153 01:30:07,760 --> 01:30:12,000 opportunity for targeted reduction 2154 01:30:09,520 --> 01:30:15,199 programs. 2155 01:30:12,000 --> 01:30:17,840 And then uh organic contamination. Um 2156 01:30:15,199 --> 01:30:19,760 the number that was presented was that 2157 01:30:17,840 --> 01:30:23,360 the city's edging towards a 3% 2158 01:30:19,760 --> 01:30:26,400 contamination rate in organics. So 97% 2159 01:30:23,360 --> 01:30:29,120 of the uh organics is actually good 2160 01:30:26,400 --> 01:30:30,880 compostable material. However, there is 2161 01:30:29,120 --> 01:30:34,080 2.63% 2162 01:30:30,880 --> 01:30:36,000 that's plastic um and other part you 2163 01:30:34,080 --> 01:30:38,159 know other components um that make up 2164 01:30:36,000 --> 01:30:40,239 contamination. Uh when we compare 2165 01:30:38,159 --> 01:30:43,360 ourselves to other municipalities uh 2166 01:30:40,239 --> 01:30:44,880 Komox is at 2.2% 2%. Camel river is at 2167 01:30:43,360 --> 01:30:47,440 0.19% 2168 01:30:44,880 --> 01:30:49,199 and Cumberland's at 0.52%. 2169 01:30:47,440 --> 01:30:50,960 However, these these latter two, Camel 2170 01:30:49,199 --> 01:30:53,440 River and Cumberland, they're still in 2171 01:30:50,960 --> 01:30:55,920 the manual collection. So, uh there is 2172 01:30:53,440 --> 01:30:57,679 that sort of oversight at the curb uh to 2173 01:30:55,920 --> 01:31:00,560 prevent that contamination from getting 2174 01:30:57,679 --> 01:31:02,800 into the into the trucks. The provincial 2175 01:31:00,560 --> 01:31:05,440 benchmark is around 2 to 5%. So, we're 2176 01:31:02,800 --> 01:31:07,520 we're doing not too bad. However, uh we 2177 01:31:05,440 --> 01:31:11,920 do want to reduce that that plastic 2178 01:31:07,520 --> 01:31:14,320 going into those automated carts. 2179 01:31:11,920 --> 01:31:15,840 And uh finally, recycling contamination. 2180 01:31:14,320 --> 01:31:19,360 So periodically throughout the year, 2181 01:31:15,840 --> 01:31:21,440 Recycle BC uh does audits themselves on 2182 01:31:19,360 --> 01:31:22,800 our recycling waste delivered to their 2183 01:31:21,440 --> 01:31:25,920 sorting facility from the city of 2184 01:31:22,800 --> 01:31:27,920 Courtney. Um and they they really 2185 01:31:25,920 --> 01:31:30,800 analyze it. So there's two 2186 01:31:27,920 --> 01:31:33,040 classifications. Um, one is called not 2187 01:31:30,800 --> 01:31:37,840 accepted material and that's highlighted 2188 01:31:33,040 --> 01:31:40,639 in the it's sort of a gray uh gray uh 2189 01:31:37,840 --> 01:31:42,960 area of that uh line chart there and 2190 01:31:40,639 --> 01:31:46,159 that's anything that's not accepted uh 2191 01:31:42,960 --> 01:31:47,600 for recycling by recycle recycle BC but 2192 01:31:46,159 --> 01:31:49,440 it might be accepted through another 2193 01:31:47,600 --> 01:31:54,000 program or a donation program. So this 2194 01:31:49,440 --> 01:31:56,159 includes books um clothing hazardous 2195 01:31:54,000 --> 01:31:59,040 materials scrap metal as well as garbage 2196 01:31:56,159 --> 01:32:00,800 and organics. So um the other category 2197 01:31:59,040 --> 01:32:04,000 is called incompatible material and 2198 01:32:00,800 --> 01:32:06,639 that's all that non-accepted material 2199 01:32:04,000 --> 01:32:10,080 plus depot recyclables like glass foam 2200 01:32:06,639 --> 01:32:12,400 and and flexible plastics as well as 2201 01:32:10,080 --> 01:32:14,560 nested material. So if you if you get 2202 01:32:12,400 --> 01:32:16,159 home and you you throw that take out the 2203 01:32:14,560 --> 01:32:19,199 takeout cups inside the takeout bag 2204 01:32:16,159 --> 01:32:21,520 without sorting it out that's considered 2205 01:32:19,199 --> 01:32:23,120 incompatible as well as recyclable that 2206 01:32:21,520 --> 01:32:27,600 recyclables that have res too much 2207 01:32:23,120 --> 01:32:30,480 residue to be recycled. So um normally 2208 01:32:27,600 --> 01:32:32,400 um we are at around 5% uh not accepted 2209 01:32:30,480 --> 01:32:33,760 materials. We're actually seeing a 2210 01:32:32,400 --> 01:32:36,480 downward trend right now which is 2211 01:32:33,760 --> 01:32:40,159 excellent. Um however if we do start to 2212 01:32:36,480 --> 01:32:43,120 to to go above that 5% level we we uh 2213 01:32:40,159 --> 01:32:46,000 will be under the eye of 2214 01:32:43,120 --> 01:32:47,600 recycle BC and we could see fines start 2215 01:32:46,000 --> 01:32:50,560 to add up. They can actually find us up 2216 01:32:47,600 --> 01:32:52,560 to $90,000 a year um if they start to 2217 01:32:50,560 --> 01:32:54,239 see above 5% contamination. So, we 2218 01:32:52,560 --> 01:32:55,840 really want to keep an eye on that and 2219 01:32:54,239 --> 01:33:00,159 we do that through the Courtney Collects 2220 01:32:55,840 --> 01:33:01,760 app, pushing out um campaigns. We we are 2221 01:33:00,159 --> 01:33:03,840 constantly updating the waste wizards. 2222 01:33:01,760 --> 01:33:06,159 So, what goes where in the recycling bin 2223 01:33:03,840 --> 01:33:08,159 as well as community outreach. So, one 2224 01:33:06,159 --> 01:33:10,080 issue that we we have been having is 2225 01:33:08,159 --> 01:33:11,760 that our contractor has limitations in 2226 01:33:10,080 --> 01:33:14,639 their contamination management tools 2227 01:33:11,760 --> 01:33:16,880 that are prescribed in the the contract. 2228 01:33:14,639 --> 01:33:19,440 Uh and we're we're working with them 2229 01:33:16,880 --> 01:33:21,520 through um in in our automated 2230 01:33:19,440 --> 01:33:23,280 collection system. So, just to highlight 2231 01:33:21,520 --> 01:33:25,679 that there's been some technology and 2232 01:33:23,280 --> 01:33:27,600 contractor challenges. The the contract 2233 01:33:25,679 --> 01:33:29,840 does specify the use of contamination 2234 01:33:27,600 --> 01:33:31,520 management tools, including the uh 2235 01:33:29,840 --> 01:33:34,080 including location location based 2236 01:33:31,520 --> 01:33:36,159 photographs um showing evidence that 2237 01:33:34,080 --> 01:33:39,199 there's contamination and that links to 2238 01:33:36,159 --> 01:33:41,679 the carts um which is a link to the 2239 01:33:39,199 --> 01:33:42,960 addressing. Um but it is important to 2240 01:33:41,679 --> 01:33:45,120 note that contamination of both 2241 01:33:42,960 --> 01:33:47,440 recycling or and organics has been 2242 01:33:45,120 --> 01:33:48,960 relatively low. However, should 2243 01:33:47,440 --> 01:33:50,880 increases occur, the city will be 2244 01:33:48,960 --> 01:33:54,000 hampered by the contractor's 2245 01:33:50,880 --> 01:33:57,760 limitations. Um, 2246 01:33:54,000 --> 01:33:59,440 so to bring this to a close, I will um 2247 01:33:57,760 --> 01:34:01,199 the staff recommendation here is to 2248 01:33:59,440 --> 01:34:04,159 receive the solid waste man uh 2249 01:34:01,199 --> 01:34:06,239 contamination management 2026 briefing 2250 01:34:04,159 --> 01:34:07,440 note. 2251 01:34:06,239 --> 01:34:09,120 » Thank you very much. 2252 01:34:07,440 --> 01:34:12,080 » Excellent. Thank Thanks very much. and 2253 01:34:09,120 --> 01:34:13,520 and maybe just uh um since the last sort 2254 01:34:12,080 --> 01:34:16,239 of the last part that you talked about 2255 01:34:13,520 --> 01:34:17,760 was was the actual ability and I believe 2256 01:34:16,239 --> 01:34:19,120 it's like camera systems and that kind 2257 01:34:17,760 --> 01:34:21,520 of stuff to be able to actually see 2258 01:34:19,120 --> 01:34:24,000 what's going in so it can be uh detected 2259 01:34:21,520 --> 01:34:26,080 right away. Um and and you know works 2260 01:34:24,000 --> 01:34:28,880 are underway. I mean I think the 2261 01:34:26,080 --> 01:34:31,199 expectation was is with this these new 2262 01:34:28,880 --> 01:34:33,280 uh trucks that uh basically that would 2263 01:34:31,199 --> 01:34:35,280 just kind of be stock um and that 2264 01:34:33,280 --> 01:34:37,600 obviously that hasn't been the way. So, 2265 01:34:35,280 --> 01:34:40,880 do we have uh any idea of like an ETA of 2266 01:34:37,600 --> 01:34:43,040 when um those systems will be uh 2267 01:34:40,880 --> 01:34:44,719 basically online so that we can benefit 2268 01:34:43,040 --> 01:34:47,600 from them? And then maybe you talked 2269 01:34:44,719 --> 01:34:49,840 about a maximum $90,000. Is that 2270 01:34:47,600 --> 01:34:53,360 something that could potentially like 2271 01:34:49,840 --> 01:34:55,360 the the haulers can help with that 2272 01:34:53,360 --> 01:34:57,120 considering we're we're kind of beholden 2273 01:34:55,360 --> 01:35:01,360 to their system? 2274 01:34:57,120 --> 01:35:03,840 » Um yes, Mr. Mayor. Um the so the two 2275 01:35:01,360 --> 01:35:06,320 parts of that question. Uh yes, there's 2276 01:35:03,840 --> 01:35:08,560 a possibility that uh those uh fines 2277 01:35:06,320 --> 01:35:11,120 could be flowing through to the 2278 01:35:08,560 --> 01:35:14,800 contractor. Um we're investigating 2279 01:35:11,120 --> 01:35:16,560 investigating that um possibility. Um to 2280 01:35:14,800 --> 01:35:18,320 the first part of your question, uh 2281 01:35:16,560 --> 01:35:19,600 their operational staff on the island 2282 01:35:18,320 --> 01:35:22,560 here have reached out to me actually 2283 01:35:19,600 --> 01:35:24,800 this week um with some very positive 2284 01:35:22,560 --> 01:35:27,120 news that the cameras are installed and 2285 01:35:24,800 --> 01:35:29,679 they hope to have a couple weeks of 2286 01:35:27,120 --> 01:35:31,440 data, you know, from the new year on um 2287 01:35:29,679 --> 01:35:32,800 available this week. So, I'm really 2288 01:35:31,440 --> 01:35:34,639 looking forward to that and we'll be 2289 01:35:32,800 --> 01:35:35,440 sharing that as information becomes 2290 01:35:34,639 --> 01:35:37,219 available. 2291 01:35:35,440 --> 01:35:38,639 » Awesome. Uh really appreciate 2292 01:35:37,219 --> 01:35:40,320 [clears throat] the update on that. Uh 2293 01:35:38,639 --> 01:35:41,679 and councelor FR. 2294 01:35:40,320 --> 01:35:43,840 » Yeah, thanks Meredith. Thanks for the 2295 01:35:41,679 --> 01:35:46,159 presentation. Um Chris, I wonder if you 2296 01:35:43,840 --> 01:35:48,000 could just off the top of your head give 2297 01:35:46,159 --> 01:35:50,159 a list of organic contaminants that 2298 01:35:48,000 --> 01:35:52,080 you're seeing, you know, that 3% what 2299 01:35:50,159 --> 01:35:53,120 kind of things we're talking about. I'm 2300 01:35:52,080 --> 01:35:54,560 going to [snorts] assume some sort of 2301 01:35:53,120 --> 01:35:57,120 plastic bag that people think is 2302 01:35:54,560 --> 01:35:58,639 recyclable, but you know what else? 2303 01:35:57,120 --> 01:36:01,600 Um, 2304 01:35:58,639 --> 01:36:03,760 yeah. So, um, it's it's plastics. Uh, 2305 01:36:01,600 --> 01:36:06,719 it's, uh, when you clean up your yard, 2306 01:36:03,760 --> 01:36:09,199 it's flip-flops, dog tennis balls. Um, 2307 01:36:06,719 --> 01:36:11,840 we're seeing things like painted picket 2308 01:36:09,199 --> 01:36:14,000 fences. Um, and unfortunately sometimes 2309 01:36:11,840 --> 01:36:16,880 diapers, things like that. Um, one of 2310 01:36:14,000 --> 01:36:19,040 the challenges is, uh, as we go over the 2311 01:36:16,880 --> 01:36:22,080 over the Christmas break, uh, we have 2312 01:36:19,040 --> 01:36:24,320 three stat holidays, so we're all 2313 01:36:22,080 --> 01:36:26,400 stretched in our garbage capacity. And 2314 01:36:24,320 --> 01:36:28,080 so sometimes people um you know it's a 2315 01:36:26,400 --> 01:36:29,840 hard time so they throw their garbage in 2316 01:36:28,080 --> 01:36:31,840 the organics and then we see a spike is 2317 01:36:29,840 --> 01:36:33,679 just in garbage. So 2318 01:36:31,840 --> 01:36:34,400 » Uh it doesn't take much for 3% to add 2319 01:36:33,679 --> 01:36:35,840 up. 2320 01:36:34,400 --> 01:36:38,880 » Yeah. And then when it comes to the 2321 01:36:35,840 --> 01:36:40,320 recycling um improvements that we want 2322 01:36:38,880 --> 01:36:42,560 to see and that that's in the mainstream 2323 01:36:40,320 --> 01:36:44,320 that we pick up obviously what sort of 2324 01:36:42,560 --> 01:36:46,320 stuff are we seeing in there? Like if 2325 01:36:44,320 --> 01:36:48,320 you just top three things that end up in 2326 01:36:46,320 --> 01:36:51,199 the recycling that really shouldn't. 2327 01:36:48,320 --> 01:36:53,840 » Yeah. So um recycling contamination is 2328 01:36:51,199 --> 01:36:56,719 reported by t by weight. So, uh, when 2329 01:36:53,840 --> 01:36:58,159 you when you go to recycle those 2330 01:36:56,719 --> 01:37:00,320 encyclopedias, you know, the 2331 01:36:58,159 --> 01:37:02,480 Encyclopedia Bratannica, that throws us 2332 01:37:00,320 --> 01:37:04,560 off almost for an entire quarter. So, 2333 01:37:02,480 --> 01:37:08,320 we're really encouraging people pay 2334 01:37:04,560 --> 01:37:09,679 attention. Um, books, hardbound books, 2335 01:37:08,320 --> 01:37:11,760 paperback books, unfortunately, are not 2336 01:37:09,679 --> 01:37:13,600 recyclable, but they are donatable. So, 2337 01:37:11,760 --> 01:37:14,960 that's one of our I would say that's our 2338 01:37:13,600 --> 01:37:16,560 biggest challenge. 2339 01:37:14,960 --> 01:37:18,719 » And I wonder if it's worth a social 2340 01:37:16,560 --> 01:37:20,560 media post about these kind of two items 2341 01:37:18,719 --> 01:37:21,920 that were I don't know if people maybe 2342 01:37:20,560 --> 01:37:24,880 just don't know about it. And if they 2343 01:37:21,920 --> 01:37:25,840 did, it might be a different story. So I 2344 01:37:24,880 --> 01:37:27,440 don't know if it's a question or 2345 01:37:25,840 --> 01:37:30,239 comment, but I'll leave it with you. 2346 01:37:27,440 --> 01:37:30,800 » Yep. We absolutely it's a great idea. 2347 01:37:30,239 --> 01:37:31,840 Thank you. 2348 01:37:30,800 --> 01:37:33,119 » Yeah. Thanks. 2349 01:37:31,840 --> 01:37:35,679 » Excellent. Yeah. And if we know that 2350 01:37:33,119 --> 01:37:37,040 there is that sort of increase of 2351 01:37:35,679 --> 01:37:38,480 contamination over the Christmas 2352 01:37:37,040 --> 01:37:40,719 holidays and maybe there's an 2353 01:37:38,480 --> 01:37:44,159 opportunity obviously in a newsletter 2354 01:37:40,719 --> 01:37:46,800 story uh uh but also uh again social 2355 01:37:44,159 --> 01:37:49,199 media etc. And we have you know Rotary 2356 01:37:46,800 --> 01:37:50,639 clubs doing book sales all the time. Um, 2357 01:37:49,199 --> 01:37:52,159 so there's there's definitely probably 2358 01:37:50,639 --> 01:37:55,119 some partnerships as well that could 2359 01:37:52,159 --> 01:37:57,600 happen um along with that. So, uh, 2360 01:37:55,119 --> 01:37:59,280 thanks Councelor Fish and Council Ward. 2361 01:37:57,600 --> 01:38:01,280 » Yeah, thanks Mayor. Um, yeah, I just 2362 01:37:59,280 --> 01:38:04,400 wanted to bring up a point that we heard 2363 01:38:01,280 --> 01:38:06,239 at our waste management the the the KO 2364 01:38:04,400 --> 01:38:08,159 stress Kona waste management meeting and 2365 01:38:06,239 --> 01:38:12,000 that was around the the stickers on 2366 01:38:08,159 --> 01:38:15,199 fruit and how they they get through and 2367 01:38:12,000 --> 01:38:18,080 just to remind people that those are not 2368 01:38:15,199 --> 01:38:19,600 um compostable. Um, and it would be a 2369 01:38:18,080 --> 01:38:21,520 great little invention for someone to 2370 01:38:19,600 --> 01:38:23,600 come up with something that was because 2371 01:38:21,520 --> 01:38:27,520 uh there's probably a lot of fruit 2372 01:38:23,600 --> 01:38:29,280 stickers going into the organics. 2373 01:38:27,520 --> 01:38:30,480 » Thanks for that, Council Warren and 2374 01:38:29,280 --> 01:38:32,000 Councelor Fishan. 2375 01:38:30,480 --> 01:38:34,239 » Yeah. Well, I just had a I just had a 2376 01:38:32,000 --> 01:38:36,400 thought about books. Um, is the problem 2377 01:38:34,239 --> 01:38:38,000 with books that there's no funding for 2378 01:38:36,400 --> 01:38:40,159 recycling them or is the problem the 2379 01:38:38,000 --> 01:38:42,480 material itself? And uh what I'm 2380 01:38:40,159 --> 01:38:44,800 thinking is if someone took a p a hard a 2381 01:38:42,480 --> 01:38:46,719 hardback paper book or whatever and tore 2382 01:38:44,800 --> 01:38:48,880 it apart, you know, are the pages 2383 01:38:46,719 --> 01:38:52,000 recyclable? 2384 01:38:48,880 --> 01:38:53,119 » Um I I believe that might be the case. I 2385 01:38:52,000 --> 01:38:54,880 don't want to really go on the record 2386 01:38:53,119 --> 01:38:56,239 saying if you took a band saw to it and 2387 01:38:54,880 --> 01:38:58,239 tore everything apart. 2388 01:38:56,239 --> 01:39:01,760 » Yeah. Yeah. Well, then we won't get into 2389 01:38:58,239 --> 01:39:04,320 it, but just came to mind. Thanks. 2390 01:39:01,760 --> 01:39:08,560 » Thanks, K. [clears throat] 2391 01:39:04,320 --> 01:39:11,679 » All right. Um, and we'll um uh receive 2392 01:39:08,560 --> 01:39:14,480 this unanimously by by council and move 2393 01:39:11,679 --> 01:39:16,800 on to uh Komox Valley Regional District 2394 01:39:14,480 --> 01:39:19,760 request for consent for adopting bylaw 2395 01:39:16,800 --> 01:39:25,400 number 900, Komox Valley Economic 2396 01:39:19,760 --> 01:39:25,400 Development Service Conversion bylaw 345 2397 01:39:29,440 --> 01:39:32,480 and so 2398 01:39:32,358 --> 01:39:34,880 [clears throat] 2399 01:39:32,480 --> 01:39:36,560 » Oh, Mr. Garb. No, thank you. Uh through 2400 01:39:34,880 --> 01:39:40,400 the the mayor to council. There's no 2401 01:39:36,560 --> 01:39:43,360 presentation. Uh the the uh bylaws uh on 2402 01:39:40,400 --> 01:39:45,920 the agenda. It's been um it's a 2403 01:39:43,360 --> 01:39:48,400 technical change to address uh the 2404 01:39:45,920 --> 01:39:50,880 purpose of the the [clears throat] 2405 01:39:48,400 --> 01:39:54,719 function. Um we've been uh getting 2406 01:39:50,880 --> 01:39:56,960 regular updates from uh service provider 2407 01:39:54,719 --> 01:40:01,199 on this item and uh we don't have any uh 2408 01:39:56,960 --> 01:40:02,800 anything to add to this uh and uh in 2409 01:40:01,199 --> 01:40:06,080 accordance with our participation in the 2410 01:40:02,800 --> 01:40:10,280 service uh consenting is applicable 2411 01:40:06,080 --> 01:40:10,280 should council take that direction. 2412 01:40:10,800 --> 01:40:14,960 » All right and yeah so basically 2413 01:40:12,719 --> 01:40:16,480 housekeeping item uh thanks for that. 2414 01:40:14,960 --> 01:40:18,639 It's been moved and seconded. Any 2415 01:40:16,480 --> 01:40:20,800 further questions or comments? See none. 2416 01:40:18,639 --> 01:40:24,400 All those in favor? 2417 01:40:20,800 --> 01:40:25,600 Any opposed? And motion carries. Um, and 2418 01:40:24,400 --> 01:40:27,760 we'll move on to the Comox Valley 2419 01:40:25,600 --> 01:40:30,080 Regional District uh, Komox Valley Sewer 2420 01:40:27,760 --> 01:40:32,480 Conveyance Project Water Supply to 2421 01:40:30,080 --> 01:40:33,600 Courtney Pump Station. And I'll pass it 2422 01:40:32,480 --> 01:40:35,360 over to Mr. Garbid as well. 2423 01:40:33,600 --> 01:40:36,719 » Yeah, thanks. Uh, just to facilitate the 2424 01:40:35,360 --> 01:40:39,760 discussion, we don't have a staff report 2425 01:40:36,719 --> 01:40:41,760 on this. It's a it's a a quirk in our 2426 01:40:39,760 --> 01:40:43,520 bylaw that we now have a property that 2427 01:40:41,760 --> 01:40:46,960 is outside our municipal boundary that 2428 01:40:43,520 --> 01:40:51,080 requires uh, servicing and staff support 2429 01:40:46,960 --> 01:40:51,080 the request. Right. 2430 01:40:51,199 --> 01:40:54,400 It's been moved and seconded. I don't 2431 01:40:52,639 --> 01:40:57,760 see any questions or comments. All those 2432 01:40:54,400 --> 01:41:02,000 in favor and motion carries and we'll 2433 01:40:57,760 --> 01:41:04,400 move into Komox Valley uh airport YQ BC 2434 01:41:02,000 --> 01:41:05,840 air access program grant request for 2435 01:41:04,400 --> 01:41:08,480 letter of support. 2436 01:41:05,840 --> 01:41:10,560 » Recommendation. 2437 01:41:08,480 --> 01:41:13,360 » Excellent. Been moved and seconded. Any 2438 01:41:10,560 --> 01:41:15,440 questions or comments? Seeing none. All 2439 01:41:13,360 --> 01:41:20,639 those in favor? 2440 01:41:15,440 --> 01:41:22,159 Any opposed? And motion carries and uh 2441 01:41:20,639 --> 01:41:23,360 that letter is required by the end of 2442 01:41:22,159 --> 01:41:26,400 the week. So it's good to see that 2443 01:41:23,360 --> 01:41:29,199 happening. Uh 7.4 Courtney Air Park 2444 01:41:26,400 --> 01:41:31,199 Association BC Air Access Program sounds 2445 01:41:29,199 --> 01:41:33,440 very familiar. Uh request for a letter 2446 01:41:31,199 --> 01:41:34,239 of support. 2447 01:41:33,440 --> 01:41:36,080 » Second. 2448 01:41:34,239 --> 01:41:38,480 » It's been moved and seconded. And 2449 01:41:36,080 --> 01:41:40,400 councelor Moore. Um yeah, just very 2450 01:41:38,480 --> 01:41:43,760 briefly, both of these um support 2451 01:41:40,400 --> 01:41:46,239 letters are it's good news story that um 2452 01:41:43,760 --> 01:41:48,560 that the air park is looking to 2453 01:41:46,239 --> 01:41:51,600 electrify and solarize or whatever the 2454 01:41:48,560 --> 01:41:54,400 the verb is for that um the facilities 2455 01:41:51,600 --> 01:41:56,800 down there. Thank you. 2456 01:41:54,400 --> 01:41:59,760 » Thanks for that, Council Min. And uh 2457 01:41:56,800 --> 01:42:01,920 with that, uh all those in favor? Any 2458 01:41:59,760 --> 01:42:06,000 opposed? And that motion carries as 2459 01:42:01,920 --> 01:42:07,119 well. and we'll move into uh item 8.1 2460 01:42:06,000 --> 01:42:10,400 community and social development 2461 01:42:07,119 --> 01:42:15,455 framework in action plan update and I'll 2462 01:42:10,400 --> 01:42:17,679 pass it over to Miss Ba or Mr. Garvin. 2463 01:42:15,455 --> 01:42:19,840 [snorts] Thank you mayor. Uh through you 2464 01:42:17,679 --> 01:42:21,440 and council Joan Bay our community 2465 01:42:19,840 --> 01:42:23,360 development coordinators can introduce a 2466 01:42:21,440 --> 01:42:25,520 report and recommendation for staff's or 2467 01:42:23,360 --> 01:42:30,119 sorry for council's consideration which 2468 01:42:25,520 --> 01:42:30,119 is to receive the action plan update. 2469 01:42:30,520 --> 01:42:33,360 » [clears throat] 2470 01:42:30,719 --> 01:42:35,600 » Thank you through Mayor and Council. I'm 2471 01:42:33,360 --> 01:42:38,159 really uh delighted to pres present an 2472 01:42:35,600 --> 01:42:41,119 update on the progress with the uh 2473 01:42:38,159 --> 01:42:42,880 community social development plan. Um 2474 01:42:41,119 --> 01:42:45,040 and I'm going to focus on what's 2475 01:42:42,880 --> 01:42:47,119 happened since the last presentation, 2476 01:42:45,040 --> 01:42:50,000 specifically the two strategies that 2477 01:42:47,119 --> 01:42:52,135 were approved to inform the plan. And 2478 01:42:50,000 --> 01:42:54,239 those strategies, one was 2479 01:42:52,135 --> 01:42:57,679 [clears throat] a neighborhood network 2480 01:42:54,239 --> 01:42:59,520 strategy which was focused on uh 2481 01:42:57,679 --> 01:43:01,280 place-based community development to 2482 01:42:59,520 --> 01:43:03,360 strengthen neighborhood connections, 2483 01:43:01,280 --> 01:43:06,880 resilience, and cohesion. And the other 2484 01:43:03,360 --> 01:43:08,480 was a better together strategy was which 2485 01:43:06,880 --> 01:43:10,960 was essentially focusing on 2486 01:43:08,480 --> 01:43:13,920 partnerships, coordination and capacity 2487 01:43:10,960 --> 01:43:15,920 among service organizations and 2488 01:43:13,920 --> 01:43:19,520 collaborative tables who are working in 2489 01:43:15,920 --> 01:43:22,320 the social uh development and area with 2490 01:43:19,520 --> 01:43:25,360 an emphasis this collaboration with an 2491 01:43:22,320 --> 01:43:27,600 emphasis on upstream and preventive uh 2492 01:43:25,360 --> 01:43:28,816 action. So trying to move our work a bit 2493 01:43:27,600 --> 01:43:29,440 upstream. 2494 01:43:28,816 --> 01:43:32,159 » [clears throat] 2495 01:43:29,440 --> 01:43:35,280 » I'm really happy to say that we have uh 2496 01:43:32,159 --> 01:43:38,080 had some considerable progress over our 2497 01:43:35,280 --> 01:43:40,400 this past few months. We've moved from a 2498 01:43:38,080 --> 01:43:43,119 discovery phase to planning and we're 2499 01:43:40,400 --> 01:43:46,080 well into activation 2500 01:43:43,119 --> 01:43:49,600 uh in the key milestones in this period 2501 01:43:46,080 --> 01:43:52,719 uh included uh hiring uh retaining uh 2502 01:43:49,600 --> 01:43:56,159 consultant teams to help uh move roll 2503 01:43:52,719 --> 01:43:58,800 out these two strategies. uh one team uh 2504 01:43:56,159 --> 01:44:00,000 is the urban matters 2505 01:43:58,800 --> 01:44:02,800 sorry [clears throat] I've got a frog in 2506 01:44:00,000 --> 01:44:04,639 my throat uh urban matters and they're 2507 01:44:02,800 --> 01:44:07,520 primarily responsible for the roll out 2508 01:44:04,639 --> 01:44:09,280 of the better together uh strategy uh 2509 01:44:07,520 --> 01:44:11,520 the planning and the activation of that 2510 01:44:09,280 --> 01:44:14,719 they are also taking on responsibility 2511 01:44:11,520 --> 01:44:18,880 for the overall evaluation of the whole 2512 01:44:14,719 --> 01:44:20,880 CSDA initiative um our CSD initiative um 2513 01:44:18,880 --> 01:44:23,119 and then we have pollinate and that team 2514 01:44:20,880 --> 01:44:24,239 is responsible primarily for the 2515 01:44:23,119 --> 01:44:28,239 activation 2516 01:44:24,239 --> 01:44:30,639 of the um uh nebrite network strategy um 2517 01:44:28,239 --> 01:44:32,880 and supporting the evaluation efforts 2518 01:44:30,639 --> 01:44:35,600 during this team. This term we also 2519 01:44:32,880 --> 01:44:37,360 developed a communications strategy and 2520 01:44:35,600 --> 01:44:40,000 have started implementing that. We 2521 01:44:37,360 --> 01:44:43,040 actually have a new website uh pages 2522 01:44:40,000 --> 01:44:44,639 that were just went up yesterday. Um and 2523 01:44:43,040 --> 01:44:47,920 postcards and a number of other things. 2524 01:44:44,639 --> 01:44:49,760 We've also um started the evaluation. We 2525 01:44:47,920 --> 01:44:54,320 have an evaluation plan and tools 2526 01:44:49,760 --> 01:44:57,040 developed and underway. And finally, we 2527 01:44:54,320 --> 01:44:59,040 are I guess in we've developed the 2528 01:44:57,040 --> 01:45:01,360 strategy, the actual roadmap to move 2529 01:44:59,040 --> 01:45:04,480 these things forward. 2530 01:45:01,360 --> 01:45:07,280 I'm um pretty excited about um both of 2531 01:45:04,480 --> 01:45:10,560 these pieces. The neighborhood uh 2532 01:45:07,280 --> 01:45:12,800 network strategy in particular um we've 2533 01:45:10,560 --> 01:45:15,840 established criteria. We're going to 2534 01:45:12,800 --> 01:45:17,280 have a um a pilot of four different 2535 01:45:15,840 --> 01:45:18,639 neighborhoods, a minimum of four 2536 01:45:17,280 --> 01:45:21,440 different different neighborhoods who 2537 01:45:18,639 --> 01:45:24,639 will be engaged in the strategy. And uh 2538 01:45:21,440 --> 01:45:27,760 the focus is to build uh as I said uh 2539 01:45:24,639 --> 01:45:30,560 social cohesion to support community 2540 01:45:27,760 --> 01:45:34,400 resilience, identity and communications 2541 01:45:30,560 --> 01:45:38,159 uh amongst uh neighbors and um so we've 2542 01:45:34,400 --> 01:45:40,639 developed criteria for participation. 2543 01:45:38,159 --> 01:45:43,840 We've um we've the animator has 2544 01:45:40,639 --> 01:45:46,960 conducted outreach using a snowball 2545 01:45:43,840 --> 01:45:48,719 technique and following criteria to 2546 01:45:46,960 --> 01:45:51,280 establish the neighborhoods which ones 2547 01:45:48,719 --> 01:45:52,719 are we're going to move with and some of 2548 01:45:51,280 --> 01:45:54,880 some people have asked about what is 2549 01:45:52,719 --> 01:45:56,639 that criteria and basically we're 2550 01:45:54,880 --> 01:45:58,320 looking a big piece is do we have 2551 01:45:56,639 --> 01:46:00,400 champions who are ready to move it 2552 01:45:58,320 --> 01:46:03,040 forward. uh this isn't going to be 2553 01:46:00,400 --> 01:46:05,520 community led, it's neighborhoodled and 2554 01:46:03,040 --> 01:46:07,280 uh geographic representation of course 2555 01:46:05,520 --> 01:46:11,199 following the cardinal directions of the 2556 01:46:07,280 --> 01:46:13,280 OCP and um so we've got four 2557 01:46:11,199 --> 01:46:15,119 neighborhoods coming into view. Two that 2558 01:46:13,280 --> 01:46:19,600 are firmly going to move forward. One is 2559 01:46:15,119 --> 01:46:22,480 the old orchard slash uh downtown uh 2560 01:46:19,600 --> 01:46:25,119 network is a huge boundaries 2561 01:46:22,480 --> 01:46:27,840 uh taking all of sort of Anderson flats, 2562 01:46:25,119 --> 01:46:30,239 the historic district which we tend to 2563 01:46:27,840 --> 01:46:32,719 call old orchard, a little piece up by 2564 01:46:30,239 --> 01:46:34,560 the railroad track and even up to Fifth 2565 01:46:32,719 --> 01:46:37,440 Street. So including some of the 2566 01:46:34,560 --> 01:46:40,159 downtown businesses and then um and 2567 01:46:37,440 --> 01:46:43,040 they're very focused on uh social uh 2568 01:46:40,159 --> 01:46:46,000 engagement uh activities uh to bring 2569 01:46:43,040 --> 01:46:48,320 people together to actually form norm 2570 01:46:46,000 --> 01:46:50,960 and storm and form this larger more 2571 01:46:48,320 --> 01:46:54,719 diverse network. And then there is the 2572 01:46:50,960 --> 01:46:56,800 um Urkheart Lake Trail uh neighborhood 2573 01:46:54,719 --> 01:46:59,440 network, a little tiny funky group 2574 01:46:56,800 --> 01:47:02,000 that's between Fifth and 15th along 2575 01:46:59,440 --> 01:47:04,480 Urkart and they're very much into skill 2576 01:47:02,000 --> 01:47:08,080 building. Um and they want to do a 2577 01:47:04,480 --> 01:47:09,920 placemaking project. So Laneway perhaps. 2578 01:47:08,080 --> 01:47:12,239 Um so anyway, we've got a couple going. 2579 01:47:09,920 --> 01:47:14,800 We've got a couple more uh on the way. 2580 01:47:12,239 --> 01:47:17,679 Um perhaps even three something perhaps 2581 01:47:14,800 --> 01:47:20,239 in apartments. Uh I also wanted to point 2582 01:47:17,679 --> 01:47:22,560 out that Sandwick said Sandwick and 2583 01:47:20,239 --> 01:47:25,040 Braidwood neighborhood has been engaged 2584 01:47:22,560 --> 01:47:26,639 and will probably be a third. So we're 2585 01:47:25,040 --> 01:47:28,639 trying to get the geographic 2586 01:47:26,639 --> 01:47:30,159 representation as well. So the 2587 01:47:28,639 --> 01:47:32,400 neighborhood network stuff is working 2588 01:47:30,159 --> 01:47:35,360 well. The animators out there pulling 2589 01:47:32,400 --> 01:47:37,360 together groups. Um we've developed some 2590 01:47:35,360 --> 01:47:40,159 grants uh that we were providing 2591 01:47:37,360 --> 01:47:41,920 specifically to these participating 2592 01:47:40,159 --> 01:47:43,920 neighborhoods. And in order to qualify 2593 01:47:41,920 --> 01:47:46,639 for the grants, they have to agree to be 2594 01:47:43,920 --> 01:47:49,520 in the pilot, agree to be, you know, 2595 01:47:46,639 --> 01:47:52,480 part of the evaluation, agree to take on 2596 01:47:49,520 --> 01:47:54,320 uh circle talks, agree to take on 2597 01:47:52,480 --> 01:47:56,800 projects. So, it's a big agreement for 2598 01:47:54,320 --> 01:47:59,840 just a tiny little bit of funds, uh 2599 01:47:56,800 --> 01:48:01,360 maximum $3,000, and it would be these 2600 01:47:59,840 --> 01:48:03,920 projects would have to happen between 2601 01:48:01,360 --> 01:48:07,119 now and the end of June, seed projects, 2602 01:48:03,920 --> 01:48:09,199 and the end of uh September for larger 2603 01:48:07,119 --> 01:48:11,520 placemaking projects. So far we've only 2604 01:48:09,199 --> 01:48:13,760 had two proposals or one proposal sorry 2605 01:48:11,520 --> 01:48:17,360 and another on the way and they're very 2606 01:48:13,760 --> 01:48:19,280 small. Um so that's going as we 2607 01:48:17,360 --> 01:48:22,320 expected. Uh and then the better 2608 01:48:19,280 --> 01:48:24,639 together which is the larger broader uh 2609 01:48:22,320 --> 01:48:26,320 piece of this which is bringing together 2610 01:48:24,639 --> 01:48:29,119 uh these uh leads of these different 2611 01:48:26,320 --> 01:48:31,679 organizations who are championing work 2612 01:48:29,119 --> 01:48:34,960 in the all of the determined all of the 2613 01:48:31,679 --> 01:48:37,520 areas um determined areas of health. we 2614 01:48:34,960 --> 01:48:40,639 had and and we're helping them to first 2615 01:48:37,520 --> 01:48:46,480 of all look at the landscape and try to 2616 01:48:40,639 --> 01:48:49,119 think try to see uh where we have uh uh 2617 01:48:46,480 --> 01:48:51,360 services gaps in services duplications 2618 01:48:49,119 --> 01:48:54,000 of services places we might come 2619 01:48:51,360 --> 01:48:56,239 together and coales and get priority 2620 01:48:54,000 --> 01:48:59,199 actions done and also to figure out what 2621 01:48:56,239 --> 01:49:03,360 our role is. So this is a huge piece and 2622 01:48:59,199 --> 01:49:06,000 this ter and in this period we have uh 2623 01:49:03,360 --> 01:49:09,199 the urban matters team has initiated 2624 01:49:06,000 --> 01:49:12,719 research to uh look at the plans of all 2625 01:49:09,199 --> 01:49:15,440 these organizations to pull out where 2626 01:49:12,719 --> 01:49:18,880 they are at in a continuum of work that 2627 01:49:15,440 --> 01:49:21,440 might be done to advance advance social 2628 01:49:18,880 --> 01:49:23,360 development. So from the crisis work 2629 01:49:21,440 --> 01:49:27,840 that we find that we're in involved in 2630 01:49:23,360 --> 01:49:29,679 mostly to um creating parallel systems 2631 01:49:27,840 --> 01:49:32,000 alternatives to what we're already doing 2632 01:49:29,679 --> 01:49:36,000 to policy. So they'll be looking at 2633 01:49:32,000 --> 01:49:38,639 these plans and um we had a big soft 2634 01:49:36,000 --> 01:49:41,440 launch inviting everybody to develop the 2635 01:49:38,639 --> 01:49:43,920 vision and the values and so now the 2636 01:49:41,440 --> 01:49:46,880 next step is to bring the bring those um 2637 01:49:43,920 --> 01:49:49,760 that research back to the large group 2638 01:49:46,880 --> 01:49:52,000 and spend a couple of uh workshops 2639 01:49:49,760 --> 01:49:55,199 together where we'll we'll validate our 2640 01:49:52,000 --> 01:49:57,760 findings. Do we have it right? Um you 2641 01:49:55,199 --> 01:49:59,520 know have we missed it? Anything? uh is 2642 01:49:57,760 --> 01:50:02,560 there a place where we might work 2643 01:49:59,520 --> 01:50:04,800 together and really coordinate and co 2644 01:50:02,560 --> 01:50:07,440 efforts one or two priority areas and 2645 01:50:04,800 --> 01:50:10,800 what would be each of our roles in that 2646 01:50:07,440 --> 01:50:13,199 and so those are the next steps uh all 2647 01:50:10,800 --> 01:50:15,440 is going well and I'm open for questions 2648 01:50:13,199 --> 01:50:18,480 and the recommendation is yes just to 2649 01:50:15,440 --> 01:50:20,320 receive the report. 2650 01:50:18,480 --> 01:50:22,560 » Excellent. Thanks very much. And uh 2651 01:50:20,320 --> 01:50:24,480 yeah, I was uh uh following along the 2652 01:50:22,560 --> 01:50:27,520 the acronym. There's only really one 2653 01:50:24,480 --> 01:50:30,320 acronym, the the CSD one, but uh in the 2654 01:50:27,520 --> 01:50:33,600 um uh the project timeline graph, it 2655 01:50:30,320 --> 01:50:35,360 does uh uh adjust those letters a little 2656 01:50:33,600 --> 01:50:39,440 bit. So in one of the things it actually 2657 01:50:35,360 --> 01:50:41,119 says uh um uh what was it? Um citys 2658 01:50:39,440 --> 01:50:42,719 instead. So and then I was looking for 2659 01:50:41,119 --> 01:50:47,040 what that stood for, but I'm pretty sure 2660 01:50:42,719 --> 01:50:49,360 it's just a a justosition of letters 2661 01:50:47,040 --> 01:50:50,960 » Probably. Sorry, I'm getting dyslexic or 2662 01:50:49,360 --> 01:50:52,239 something. 2663 01:50:50,960 --> 01:50:53,440 » Community and social development. 2664 01:50:52,239 --> 01:50:55,199 » It was probably spelled better. 2665 01:50:53,440 --> 01:50:57,520 » It was probably Yeah, 2666 01:50:55,199 --> 01:51:02,320 » Fair enough. Uh but other than that, um 2667 01:50:57,520 --> 01:51:04,880 I'll pass it over to um Council Hel. 2668 01:51:02,320 --> 01:51:07,520 » Thanks, Mayor. Thanks, Joanne. Um I I 2669 01:51:04,880 --> 01:51:09,840 think that uh the the work you're doing 2670 01:51:07,520 --> 01:51:12,080 uh will become more tangible once we 2671 01:51:09,840 --> 01:51:13,840 actually have the neighborhood groups 2672 01:51:12,080 --> 01:51:16,719 identifying projects that we can 2673 01:51:13,840 --> 01:51:18,000 actually describe. And um but I just 2674 01:51:16,719 --> 01:51:20,400 want to acknowledge that I've been to 2675 01:51:18,000 --> 01:51:22,639 two events that you've coordinated. Uh 2676 01:51:20,400 --> 01:51:24,719 one was a presentation to the social 2677 01:51:22,639 --> 01:51:27,280 planning society with over 30 2678 01:51:24,719 --> 01:51:30,719 representatives of local agencies. The 2679 01:51:27,280 --> 01:51:32,880 other was a larger event with probably 2680 01:51:30,719 --> 01:51:34,560 over 100 people. and and I thought you 2681 01:51:32,880 --> 01:51:37,040 did an excellent job of presenting at 2682 01:51:34,560 --> 01:51:39,840 both and I thought that both events that 2683 01:51:37,040 --> 01:51:42,800 I attended showed evidence of community 2684 01:51:39,840 --> 01:51:46,800 being receptive to uh this work which is 2685 01:51:42,800 --> 01:51:48,880 really about um where finding this this 2686 01:51:46,800 --> 01:51:51,440 the appropriate place for the city to 2687 01:51:48,880 --> 01:51:53,040 intervene in the in the many uh social 2688 01:51:51,440 --> 01:51:55,520 challenges in our community that we 2689 01:51:53,040 --> 01:52:00,159 often get called upon to respond to. So 2690 01:51:55,520 --> 01:52:02,560 thanks for your work uh in this regard. 2691 01:52:00,159 --> 01:52:04,960 Thanks uh councelor Helian and councelor 2692 01:52:02,560 --> 01:52:07,840 Fr and thanks mayor and thanks for the 2693 01:52:04,960 --> 01:52:10,560 presentation. I had a question about the 2694 01:52:07,840 --> 01:52:13,280 uh the better together strategy and who 2695 01:52:10,560 --> 01:52:16,159 sort of the main players are right now 2696 01:52:13,280 --> 01:52:18,080 in that strategy. The main I guess it's 2697 01:52:16,159 --> 01:52:20,880 organizations that you're targeting 2698 01:52:18,080 --> 01:52:24,159 existing ones I would assume. 2699 01:52:20,880 --> 01:52:27,599 » Uh it's primarily the leads of 2700 01:52:24,159 --> 01:52:32,000 organizations who are championing work 2701 01:52:27,599 --> 01:52:34,159 in each of the determinant areas. So 2702 01:52:32,000 --> 01:52:38,080 primarily I want to be clear that we 2703 01:52:34,159 --> 01:52:40,560 also have uh leads in local government 2704 01:52:38,080 --> 01:52:44,560 uh who surround us uh who are working in 2705 01:52:40,560 --> 01:52:46,960 this area. We also have invited uh 2706 01:52:44,560 --> 01:52:50,880 people with lived and living experience 2707 01:52:46,960 --> 01:52:55,520 to those groups and also KFN and uh 2708 01:52:50,880 --> 01:52:58,080 Matei. So quite a diverse group. I was 2709 01:52:55,520 --> 01:53:00,480 really hoping because the answer won't 2710 01:52:58,080 --> 01:53:02,960 be with service providers actually at 2711 01:53:00,480 --> 01:53:04,960 the end of the day. Uh I think the 2712 01:53:02,960 --> 01:53:07,440 answer is going to be answer is going to 2713 01:53:04,960 --> 01:53:10,080 be part of that of course but we want to 2714 01:53:07,440 --> 01:53:12,960 move to a a place where we don't have to 2715 01:53:10,080 --> 01:53:15,040 providing hook so many services and we 2716 01:53:12,960 --> 01:53:19,520 want to bring some of the people in who 2717 01:53:15,040 --> 01:53:23,119 are change agents right uh so I can 2718 01:53:19,520 --> 01:53:25,599 foresee these two workshops where we're 2719 01:53:23,119 --> 01:53:28,000 identifying possibilities followed by a 2720 01:53:25,599 --> 01:53:31,280 larger 2721 01:53:28,000 --> 01:53:33,920 citywide event pending my ability to 2722 01:53:31,280 --> 01:53:36,400 secure resources for that a larger 2723 01:53:33,920 --> 01:53:38,800 citywide event which would bring in 2724 01:53:36,400 --> 01:53:41,280 these neighborhood network leads, the 2725 01:53:38,800 --> 01:53:44,800 capacity that's out there to help us 2726 01:53:41,280 --> 01:53:46,320 move our work a little further upstream. 2727 01:53:44,800 --> 01:53:48,000 » Sounds good. And and how are we 2728 01:53:46,320 --> 01:53:50,320 advertising the neighborhood network 2729 01:53:48,000 --> 01:53:52,320 strategy work that you're doing? You 2730 01:53:50,320 --> 01:53:54,880 said you were looking for neighborhoods 2731 01:53:52,320 --> 01:53:56,639 and you had a couple already apply for 2732 01:53:54,880 --> 01:53:58,320 some projects. How are we kind of 2733 01:53:56,639 --> 01:53:59,599 reaching out and getting those people 2734 01:53:58,320 --> 01:54:00,480 interested that might want to do 2735 01:53:59,599 --> 01:54:01,440 something like that in their 2736 01:54:00,480 --> 01:54:03,599 neighborhood? 2737 01:54:01,440 --> 01:54:06,080 » Yeah, kind of using a a snowball 2738 01:54:03,599 --> 01:54:08,639 technique. Uh we were a little bit 2739 01:54:06,080 --> 01:54:11,920 afraid of, you know, putting it up on a 2740 01:54:08,639 --> 01:54:14,480 website and getting like a ton. So, it's 2741 01:54:11,920 --> 01:54:16,480 the one person recommends somebody else 2742 01:54:14,480 --> 01:54:18,000 and somebody else hears about it and 2743 01:54:16,480 --> 01:54:20,159 we're just kind of weighing what we're 2744 01:54:18,000 --> 01:54:21,679 getting in terms of are we getting the 2745 01:54:20,159 --> 01:54:24,320 spread we want? Are we getting the 2746 01:54:21,679 --> 01:54:26,880 diversity we want? And basically if the 2747 01:54:24,320 --> 01:54:29,119 if they're ready um if they've got a 2748 01:54:26,880 --> 01:54:31,440 proven track record in this that really 2749 01:54:29,119 --> 01:54:34,560 helps the champions who want to do it 2750 01:54:31,440 --> 01:54:37,119 but do we have a diverse neighborhood uh 2751 01:54:34,560 --> 01:54:38,880 are we you know yeah so some those are 2752 01:54:37,119 --> 01:54:42,239 some of the criteria but how we're doing 2753 01:54:38,880 --> 01:54:45,040 it is that way and um presentations I 2754 01:54:42,239 --> 01:54:48,000 had a couple come to me from the uh 2755 01:54:45,040 --> 01:54:50,239 library presentation recently and yeah 2756 01:54:48,000 --> 01:54:52,320 so we're using that for this 2757 01:54:50,239 --> 01:54:54,400 » Yeah kind of like a slow play is what it 2758 01:54:52,320 --> 01:54:57,599 Sounds like not just a throw it out 2759 01:54:54,400 --> 01:54:59,920 there request for proposal in a post. 2760 01:54:57,599 --> 01:55:02,080 » No, cuz if I had put up these proposals, 2761 01:54:59,920 --> 01:55:04,080 I'm sure we would have had way more than 2762 01:55:02,080 --> 01:55:06,159 we could handle. 2763 01:55:04,080 --> 01:55:11,400 » Thank you. 2764 01:55:06,159 --> 01:55:11,400 Thanks, Councelor Fr and Council Warren. 2765 01:55:12,719 --> 01:55:15,840 » Didn't realize my light was on. 2766 01:55:14,239 --> 01:55:18,000 » Well, it's and and the microphones are 2767 01:55:15,840 --> 01:55:19,679 going on and off, so maybe uh you can 2768 01:55:18,000 --> 01:55:22,080 leave your microphone on next time as 2769 01:55:19,679 --> 01:55:23,199 well. Um 2770 01:55:22,080 --> 01:55:25,280 » Um thank you so much for the 2771 01:55:23,199 --> 01:55:28,080 presentation. Of course um some of us 2772 01:55:25,280 --> 01:55:30,320 already had the the pleasure of of 2773 01:55:28,080 --> 01:55:34,080 seeing um the presentation at social 2774 01:55:30,320 --> 01:55:36,239 planning. Um and you know that you're 2775 01:55:34,080 --> 01:55:39,040 starting with four pilot neighborhoods 2776 01:55:36,239 --> 01:55:41,440 and then you'll do all the evaluation 2777 01:55:39,040 --> 01:55:46,239 and see what comes out of that. Um, do 2778 01:55:41,440 --> 01:55:50,159 you is there a goal for down the road, 2779 01:55:46,239 --> 01:55:52,400 you know, is there a target per year to 2780 01:55:50,159 --> 01:55:53,840 or in terms of the neighborhoods or you 2781 01:55:52,400 --> 01:55:55,840 just going to start with the four and 2782 01:55:53,840 --> 01:55:57,840 see how that all goes and how it rolls 2783 01:55:55,840 --> 01:55:59,440 out? 2784 01:55:57,840 --> 01:56:01,440 » Yeah, I think we're just starting with 2785 01:55:59,440 --> 01:56:03,280 the four. I mean, I wish I could have a 2786 01:56:01,440 --> 01:56:05,679 target so to know that we're going to do 2787 01:56:03,280 --> 01:56:06,880 this year after year after year, but uh 2788 01:56:05,679 --> 01:56:09,360 we're going to start with the four. But 2789 01:56:06,880 --> 01:56:11,679 I can say already uh it's really about 2790 01:56:09,360 --> 01:56:15,599 the capacity of the neighborhoods that 2791 01:56:11,679 --> 01:56:19,040 we bring on and the animator uh and and 2792 01:56:15,599 --> 01:56:21,360 my own like how many um so what that 2793 01:56:19,040 --> 01:56:24,159 that'll come through the evaluation what 2794 01:56:21,360 --> 01:56:26,080 we're thinking per year four seem to be 2795 01:56:24,159 --> 01:56:28,320 but you know the old orchard one for 2796 01:56:26,080 --> 01:56:30,960 instance I should call old orchard 2797 01:56:28,320 --> 01:56:32,239 downtown it's probably four 2798 01:56:30,960 --> 01:56:35,280 neighborhoods 2799 01:56:32,239 --> 01:56:38,560 » So that's we're calling one and then you 2800 01:56:35,280 --> 01:56:40,719 know so We'll find those numbers as we 2801 01:56:38,560 --> 01:56:43,599 It's organic that way, 2802 01:56:40,719 --> 01:56:44,719 » Right? Um I don't know if Susie wanted 2803 01:56:43,599 --> 01:56:47,040 to answer something. 2804 01:56:44,719 --> 01:56:48,480 » Do you want to jump in? Yeah. 2805 01:56:47,040 --> 01:56:51,440 » Thank you to the mayor to council more 2806 01:56:48,480 --> 01:56:54,239 just to build on uh what Miss Ba said. 2807 01:56:51,440 --> 01:56:56,080 uh once we're complete well this phase 2808 01:56:54,239 --> 01:56:58,480 of work and the evaluation we'll be 2809 01:56:56,080 --> 01:57:00,159 coming back to council with uh what 2810 01:56:58,480 --> 01:57:02,239 we've learned what the outcomes of the 2811 01:57:00,159 --> 01:57:04,239 evaluation were and through that then 2812 01:57:02,239 --> 01:57:06,320 looking for direction from council on 2813 01:57:04,239 --> 01:57:08,400 what a future program could look like. 2814 01:57:06,320 --> 01:57:10,080 So, uh, at this point, we wouldn't be 2815 01:57:08,400 --> 01:57:12,800 able to identify how many we should 2816 01:57:10,080 --> 01:57:14,480 have. But through this process, uh, even 2817 01:57:12,800 --> 01:57:16,080 just the process of identifying 2818 01:57:14,480 --> 01:57:17,199 neighborhoods, we're capturing what 2819 01:57:16,080 --> 01:57:18,880 we're learning from that, the 2820 01:57:17,199 --> 01:57:21,119 experience, what's successful, what's 2821 01:57:18,880 --> 01:57:22,560 not. Uh, and that'll all be built into a 2822 01:57:21,119 --> 01:57:24,159 future proposal for council's 2823 01:57:22,560 --> 01:57:25,280 consideration. And then, uh, that's 2824 01:57:24,159 --> 01:57:27,040 where we would set some of those 2825 01:57:25,280 --> 01:57:29,360 targets, whether it's funding or 2826 01:57:27,040 --> 01:57:31,520 numbers, etc. Uh, so we'd be back to 2827 01:57:29,360 --> 01:57:33,119 council for looking for that direction 2828 01:57:31,520 --> 01:57:35,040 based on recommendations from this 2829 01:57:33,119 --> 01:57:37,119 experience. 2830 01:57:35,040 --> 01:57:40,800 » Yeah. I just I think the potential is 2831 01:57:37,119 --> 01:57:42,719 amazing. I it really um dubtales with 2832 01:57:40,800 --> 01:57:44,639 what the regional well the whole 2833 01:57:42,719 --> 01:57:46,719 region's doing around emergency 2834 01:57:44,639 --> 01:57:48,880 management and emergency preparedness 2835 01:57:46,719 --> 01:57:51,199 and and like you say the neighborhoods 2836 01:57:48,880 --> 01:57:54,880 are all um diverse and have their own 2837 01:57:51,199 --> 01:57:57,520 focuses and and needs and ideas and 2838 01:57:54,880 --> 01:57:59,520 it'll be really interesting to see what 2839 01:57:57,520 --> 01:58:02,239 everybody comes out out with. Then I 2840 01:57:59,520 --> 01:58:04,560 think you know it's there's funding for 2841 01:58:02,239 --> 01:58:08,080 projects and projects is is a big piece 2842 01:58:04,560 --> 01:58:10,560 of it but as you say really the ultimate 2843 01:58:08,080 --> 01:58:13,520 goal is to have that capacity building 2844 01:58:10,560 --> 01:58:15,599 in neighborhood and and to to really 2845 01:58:13,520 --> 01:58:19,440 address things like isolation and 2846 01:58:15,599 --> 01:58:21,840 loneliness and and um you know all all 2847 01:58:19,440 --> 01:58:24,639 the things you know food security and 2848 01:58:21,840 --> 01:58:27,040 helping neighbors and and people feeling 2849 01:58:24,639 --> 01:58:28,800 more of a sense of belonging. So, um, I 2850 01:58:27,040 --> 01:58:31,840 thank you for your work and it's great 2851 01:58:28,800 --> 01:58:36,239 to see the start of, um, some of those 2852 01:58:31,840 --> 01:58:38,960 tangibles coming forward. Thank you. 2853 01:58:36,239 --> 01:58:40,800 » Excellent. Uh, I think, uh, that that's 2854 01:58:38,960 --> 01:58:43,040 the the discussion. If somebody would 2855 01:58:40,800 --> 01:58:45,040 like to move receipt. 2856 01:58:43,040 --> 01:58:47,599 » Excellent. And we'll receive that on 2857 01:58:45,040 --> 01:58:49,520 behalf of, uh, council unanimously. 2858 01:58:47,599 --> 01:58:51,360 Thanks very much. And then we'll jump 2859 01:58:49,520 --> 01:58:53,520 right into our regional sports field 2860 01:58:51,360 --> 01:58:55,920 allocation policy project update, and 2861 01:58:53,520 --> 01:58:57,920 I'll pass it back over to Miss Sunders. 2862 01:58:55,920 --> 01:58:59,440 Thank you. Uh through the mayor council, 2863 01:58:57,920 --> 01:59:01,119 the report provides council with an 2864 01:58:59,440 --> 01:59:04,480 update on the regional sports field 2865 01:59:01,119 --> 01:59:06,000 allocation policy project. Uh the city's 2866 01:59:04,480 --> 01:59:07,599 leading this project on behalf of the 2867 01:59:06,000 --> 01:59:09,920 region based on the recommendations from 2868 01:59:07,599 --> 01:59:11,440 the 2023 Komox Valley sports field 2869 01:59:09,920 --> 01:59:13,599 strategy and with the support of our 2870 01:59:11,440 --> 01:59:15,760 local uh governments in the school 2871 01:59:13,599 --> 01:59:17,360 district. The purpose of the project is 2872 01:59:15,760 --> 01:59:19,280 to develop a consistent approach to 2873 01:59:17,360 --> 01:59:21,679 allocating fields across the region as 2874 01:59:19,280 --> 01:59:24,800 well as an consistent approach to field 2875 01:59:21,679 --> 01:59:26,719 fees as also sorry and also developing 2876 01:59:24,800 --> 01:59:29,040 recommendations for implementation of a 2877 01:59:26,719 --> 01:59:30,560 central booking agency for all fields in 2878 01:59:29,040 --> 01:59:32,800 the valley uh which is currently 2879 01:59:30,560 --> 01:59:35,360 proposed to be the city of Courtney. In 2880 01:59:32,800 --> 01:59:37,280 2025, the project team completed uh 2881 01:59:35,360 --> 01:59:39,440 research and data analysis, significant 2882 01:59:37,280 --> 01:59:41,119 engagement with field user groups and 2883 01:59:39,440 --> 01:59:42,560 established and continues to work with a 2884 01:59:41,119 --> 01:59:44,880 staff working group from the region as 2885 01:59:42,560 --> 01:59:47,599 well as a user advisory 2886 01:59:44,880 --> 01:59:50,320 uh committee uh based of field sport 2887 01:59:47,599 --> 01:59:52,320 users. Uh and they've we've presented 2888 01:59:50,320 --> 01:59:54,639 our initial findings to the staff and 2889 01:59:52,320 --> 01:59:56,960 advisory committee. So we're now 2890 01:59:54,639 --> 01:59:59,360 shifting into drafting uh allocation fee 2891 01:59:56,960 --> 02:00:01,440 and booking guiding policies and 2892 01:59:59,360 --> 02:00:02,960 principles uh which once finalized would 2893 02:00:01,440 --> 02:00:04,960 form the development of the final 2894 02:00:02,960 --> 02:00:06,880 policies. 2895 02:00:04,960 --> 02:00:09,119 The draft guiding principles being 2896 02:00:06,880 --> 02:00:11,280 reviewed uh are outlined in the report 2897 02:00:09,119 --> 02:00:13,119 and just to summarize uh there's guiding 2898 02:00:11,280 --> 02:00:15,599 principles being uh considered around 2899 02:00:13,119 --> 02:00:19,280 allocation which is really focused on 2900 02:00:15,599 --> 02:00:21,199 balancing both uh tenur uh and emerging 2901 02:00:19,280 --> 02:00:24,000 emerging sport groups in an equitable 2902 02:00:21,199 --> 02:00:25,520 manner uh and focusing on aligning the 2903 02:00:24,000 --> 02:00:28,239 right sports with the right field with 2904 02:00:25,520 --> 02:00:30,239 the right amount of time. Um it sounds 2905 02:00:28,239 --> 02:00:32,400 uh simple but it's quite complex and 2906 02:00:30,239 --> 02:00:34,159 difficult. Um but that's a key priority 2907 02:00:32,400 --> 02:00:37,840 for us is to make sure that there is 2908 02:00:34,159 --> 02:00:39,760 equitable access uh to sport field um 2909 02:00:37,840 --> 02:00:43,760 and that we're what we're proposing 2910 02:00:39,760 --> 02:00:46,560 isn't so disruptive as to sort of um 2911 02:00:43,760 --> 02:00:48,880 impact current sports groups as well. In 2912 02:00:46,560 --> 02:00:50,960 terms of fees, uh a new fee schedule for 2913 02:00:48,880 --> 02:00:53,280 all sports fields and users in the Komox 2914 02:00:50,960 --> 02:00:56,239 Valley is being considered. One that is 2915 02:00:53,280 --> 02:00:58,000 hopefully consistent across the valley. 2916 02:00:56,239 --> 02:00:59,679 uh it is being reviewed in line with the 2917 02:00:58,000 --> 02:01:01,599 city's recreation fees and charges 2918 02:00:59,679 --> 02:01:03,199 framework. So uh considering how we 2919 02:01:01,599 --> 02:01:05,840 apply a benefits-based approach to 2920 02:01:03,199 --> 02:01:07,679 setting the fees and the subsidy levels. 2921 02:01:05,840 --> 02:01:10,080 Uh [snorts] to date the user groups have 2922 02:01:07,679 --> 02:01:11,920 indicated general support for fees uh 2923 02:01:10,080 --> 02:01:14,719 including youth fees if they result in 2924 02:01:11,920 --> 02:01:16,320 improved service levels andor feal and 2925 02:01:14,719 --> 02:01:18,480 amenities 2926 02:01:16,320 --> 02:01:20,960 for booking. Courtney acting as the 2927 02:01:18,480 --> 02:01:22,400 single booking office is being proposed 2928 02:01:20,960 --> 02:01:24,159 uh along with a regional committee 2929 02:01:22,400 --> 02:01:25,840 reflective of our partner organizations 2930 02:01:24,159 --> 02:01:28,800 to support the implementation of 2931 02:01:25,840 --> 02:01:30,800 allocation policies. We expect the draft 2932 02:01:28,800 --> 02:01:33,360 policies to be complete in early spring 2933 02:01:30,800 --> 02:01:35,119 this year following which uh each 2934 02:01:33,360 --> 02:01:36,880 jurisdiction will have to review and 2935 02:01:35,119 --> 02:01:39,280 approve the recommended policies 2936 02:01:36,880 --> 02:01:41,040 including any fee bylaws respectively. 2937 02:01:39,280 --> 02:01:43,119 All of this requires significant 2938 02:01:41,040 --> 02:01:44,800 coordination and collaboration uh not 2939 02:01:43,119 --> 02:01:47,840 just at the staff level but also at the 2940 02:01:44,800 --> 02:01:49,280 elected officials level. As such uh 2941 02:01:47,840 --> 02:01:51,599 staff and consultants will be presenting 2942 02:01:49,280 --> 02:01:53,840 the findings and recommendations uh to 2943 02:01:51,599 --> 02:01:55,440 date at an upcoming elected officials 2944 02:01:53,840 --> 02:01:58,400 forum and that will include the school 2945 02:01:55,440 --> 02:02:00,560 district as well. If we're able to 2946 02:01:58,400 --> 02:02:01,920 proceed with the timeline as outlined, 2947 02:02:00,560 --> 02:02:03,760 uh we would be looking to initiate 2948 02:02:01,920 --> 02:02:05,520 implementation as early as September 2949 02:02:03,760 --> 02:02:07,520 2026, 2950 02:02:05,520 --> 02:02:09,360 uh with a priority on the artificial 2951 02:02:07,520 --> 02:02:12,080 turf that there's a new artificial turf 2952 02:02:09,360 --> 02:02:14,320 expected to come online later uh later 2953 02:02:12,080 --> 02:02:15,760 this spring, early this summer. Uh and 2954 02:02:14,320 --> 02:02:17,440 so we'd want to look at the allocation 2955 02:02:15,760 --> 02:02:19,840 policy for the what would be the two 2956 02:02:17,440 --> 02:02:21,840 turfs as our first priority. uh and then 2957 02:02:19,840 --> 02:02:24,719 followed by the remaining fields uh 2958 02:02:21,840 --> 02:02:28,159 being uh using the allocation policy and 2959 02:02:24,719 --> 02:02:29,840 fees likely for January 2028. Uh we've 2960 02:02:28,159 --> 02:02:31,199 been very clear with the user groups 2961 02:02:29,840 --> 02:02:33,760 that we want to make sure we give them 2962 02:02:31,199 --> 02:02:36,080 enough time uh to be aware of the fees 2963 02:02:33,760 --> 02:02:37,520 and the allocation policy to adjust 2964 02:02:36,080 --> 02:02:39,679 their registration timelines, 2965 02:02:37,520 --> 02:02:41,440 expectations, etc. And so that's why 2966 02:02:39,679 --> 02:02:44,080 there's such a long lead time between a 2967 02:02:41,440 --> 02:02:47,679 policy decision and implementation. And 2968 02:02:44,080 --> 02:02:50,239 I'm happy to answer any questions. 2969 02:02:47,679 --> 02:02:52,080 » Uh excellent. Thanks so much. Uh it it's 2970 02:02:50,239 --> 02:02:53,840 it's somewhat exciting to hear that 2971 02:02:52,080 --> 02:02:56,000 we're like this close to the finish 2972 02:02:53,840 --> 02:02:58,159 line. Uh you know, it has been a 2973 02:02:56,000 --> 02:03:00,239 discussion that that seems to be uh 2974 02:02:58,159 --> 02:03:02,560 ongoing for for some time. So, it's 2975 02:03:00,239 --> 02:03:05,440 great to get this update and and see 2976 02:03:02,560 --> 02:03:07,440 that uh we're we're pretty close to uh 2977 02:03:05,440 --> 02:03:10,639 pulling the trigger and and uh this 2978 02:03:07,440 --> 02:03:13,199 thing kind of uh launching into uh 2979 02:03:10,639 --> 02:03:16,560 actual implementation. So, with that, 2980 02:03:13,199 --> 02:03:18,880 I'll pass it over to Council McCulla. 2981 02:03:16,560 --> 02:03:22,080 » Yeah, similar comments. It's u great to 2982 02:03:18,880 --> 02:03:24,639 see this moving ahead and um that it 2983 02:03:22,080 --> 02:03:28,560 seems like it's been fairly wellreceived 2984 02:03:24,639 --> 02:03:31,840 by those that we've engaged with. Um I 2985 02:03:28,560 --> 02:03:35,679 think that willingness to um take take 2986 02:03:31,840 --> 02:03:38,719 on these changes and um the relatively 2987 02:03:35,679 --> 02:03:41,440 um good acceptance of the possibility of 2988 02:03:38,719 --> 02:03:43,520 the changes probably reflects that 2989 02:03:41,440 --> 02:03:45,840 there's a real recognition that um 2990 02:03:43,520 --> 02:03:47,679 fields are a finite resource and having 2991 02:03:45,840 --> 02:03:51,280 good policy in place that makes it clear 2992 02:03:47,679 --> 02:03:56,000 and fair on on who gets what when is 2993 02:03:51,280 --> 02:03:58,480 probably overdue. Um, and I do have a 2994 02:03:56,000 --> 02:04:02,239 question and it's not necessarily 2995 02:03:58,480 --> 02:04:06,080 related to the next steps here, but um, 2996 02:04:02,239 --> 02:04:09,199 we have other sport um, shared resources 2997 02:04:06,080 --> 02:04:11,520 that aren't necessarily fields that um, 2998 02:04:09,199 --> 02:04:13,360 you know, one of them came up um, at the 2999 02:04:11,520 --> 02:04:15,679 recreation commission meeting yesterday 3000 02:04:13,360 --> 02:04:18,239 around um, gym space, which you know is 3001 02:04:15,679 --> 02:04:21,840 very sim similar to um, fields in terms 3002 02:04:18,239 --> 02:04:24,000 of usage and and um, how it's spread out 3003 02:04:21,840 --> 02:04:27,199 in the community and I'm wondering if in 3004 02:04:24,000 --> 02:04:30,480 this um process that there has been an 3005 02:04:27,199 --> 02:04:32,480 any discussion or identification on um 3006 02:04:30,480 --> 02:04:35,280 whether or not we would kind of expand 3007 02:04:32,480 --> 02:04:38,560 this whole process to other types of 3008 02:04:35,280 --> 02:04:41,760 facilities in the community or if um or 3009 02:04:38,560 --> 02:04:44,116 if we're going to take a pause when we 3010 02:04:41,760 --> 02:04:44,639 get to completion on this. 3011 02:04:44,116 --> 02:04:45,920 [clears throat] 3012 02:04:44,639 --> 02:04:48,239 Thank you through the mayor to councelor 3013 02:04:45,920 --> 02:04:52,560 McCullum. Um 3014 02:04:48,239 --> 02:04:53,840 I would suggest uh that we will p I 3015 02:04:52,560 --> 02:04:55,760 don't I don't want to say pause but we 3016 02:04:53,840 --> 02:04:58,480 will focus on the implementation of the 3017 02:04:55,760 --> 02:05:01,920 uh sport field allocation policy. That 3018 02:04:58,480 --> 02:05:03,520 will take a number of seasons uh to work 3019 02:05:01,920 --> 02:05:04,880 through to a place where everyone's 3020 02:05:03,520 --> 02:05:06,719 feeling comfortable and confident with 3021 02:05:04,880 --> 02:05:08,480 it and give us time to also tweak it in 3022 02:05:06,719 --> 02:05:10,719 case there's I'm sure there'll be things 3023 02:05:08,480 --> 02:05:13,679 we'll want to improve. uh there hasn't 3024 02:05:10,719 --> 02:05:16,560 been discussion uh at the regional sort 3025 02:05:13,679 --> 02:05:19,599 of staff advisory group around 3026 02:05:16,560 --> 02:05:22,400 considering a similar regional policy 3027 02:05:19,599 --> 02:05:24,880 allocation policy for indoor space and I 3028 02:05:22,400 --> 02:05:27,199 would offer it at this point that that's 3029 02:05:24,880 --> 02:05:28,960 probably not something I as a staff I 3030 02:05:27,199 --> 02:05:31,440 would recommend because the demands on 3031 02:05:28,960 --> 02:05:34,000 indoor space are quite different than 3032 02:05:31,440 --> 02:05:37,599 sport fields. uh for sports fields, 3033 02:05:34,000 --> 02:05:40,800 we're we're basically balancing the need 3034 02:05:37,599 --> 02:05:43,440 of just public access with uh permitted 3035 02:05:40,800 --> 02:05:46,800 time. Uh we're not they're not 3036 02:05:43,440 --> 02:05:49,520 facilities where we also have um sort of 3037 02:05:46,800 --> 02:05:51,199 the city programming spaces, other 3038 02:05:49,520 --> 02:05:52,800 private interest, other social sort of 3039 02:05:51,199 --> 02:05:56,960 and you're you're managing all these 3040 02:05:52,800 --> 02:05:58,800 complex bookings. Um and so I I don't 3041 02:05:56,960 --> 02:06:00,080 think that would come up. I do know and 3042 02:05:58,800 --> 02:06:03,040 and we had this conversation with the 3043 02:06:00,080 --> 02:06:05,119 parks and recreation advisory commission 3044 02:06:03,040 --> 02:06:06,880 uh that from this work uh the city of 3045 02:06:05,119 --> 02:06:08,560 Courtney for instance would look to use 3046 02:06:06,880 --> 02:06:10,480 some of the allocation principles and 3047 02:06:08,560 --> 02:06:13,199 policies for some of our other outdoor 3048 02:06:10,480 --> 02:06:15,760 sport facilities like tennis courts uh 3049 02:06:13,199 --> 02:06:18,080 pickle ball courts uh we have a lacrosse 3050 02:06:15,760 --> 02:06:21,840 box uh those types of things we our our 3051 02:06:18,080 --> 02:06:23,760 allocation policies are um not refined 3052 02:06:21,840 --> 02:06:26,400 I'd say for those areas and so we would 3053 02:06:23,760 --> 02:06:29,040 apply those after we finish the field uh 3054 02:06:26,400 --> 02:06:31,920 work. Yeah, that makes good sense. Yeah, 3055 02:06:29,040 --> 02:06:33,840 thanks for pointing that out. Um that 3056 02:06:31,920 --> 02:06:36,719 yeah, there's a lot more pressures on 3057 02:06:33,840 --> 02:06:39,199 our indoor spaces, so not as easy to 3058 02:06:36,719 --> 02:06:41,119 take on the same framework. Uh the other 3059 02:06:39,199 --> 02:06:43,119 question I had too was just whether or 3060 02:06:41,119 --> 02:06:45,840 not in this process of engaging with our 3061 02:06:43,119 --> 02:06:47,920 various groups if there was 3062 02:06:45,840 --> 02:06:50,079 any changes identified or anything that 3063 02:06:47,920 --> 02:06:54,159 came out of those groups or if it was 3064 02:06:50,079 --> 02:06:57,440 mostly an exercise and just um you know 3065 02:06:54,159 --> 02:07:01,360 explaining the framework and getting um 3066 02:06:57,440 --> 02:07:04,079 people on side or if we made any changes 3067 02:07:01,360 --> 02:07:06,480 um based on anything that came came out 3068 02:07:04,079 --> 02:07:10,320 of those sessions. 3069 02:07:06,480 --> 02:07:12,560 Uh thank you S council McCullum. Um I 3070 02:07:10,320 --> 02:07:14,960 think the group's feedback to date has 3071 02:07:12,560 --> 02:07:16,639 been mostly focused on implementation 3072 02:07:14,960 --> 02:07:19,040 and how it will be implemented and 3073 02:07:16,639 --> 02:07:21,040 that's where I think uh they've you know 3074 02:07:19,040 --> 02:07:23,599 for example when we start to talk about 3075 02:07:21,040 --> 02:07:25,679 a single allocate or booking agency we 3076 02:07:23,599 --> 02:07:27,199 start to talk about seasonal uh booking 3077 02:07:25,679 --> 02:07:30,480 timelines and allocation and 3078 02:07:27,199 --> 02:07:33,280 understanding from all these sports with 3079 02:07:30,480 --> 02:07:35,360 a variety of seasons and timings when 3080 02:07:33,280 --> 02:07:37,840 those best moments are during the year 3081 02:07:35,360 --> 02:07:40,639 to plan uh for their future allocations 3082 02:07:37,840 --> 02:07:42,800 and how the interaction between the 3083 02:07:40,639 --> 02:07:44,960 allocation and their registration happen 3084 02:07:42,800 --> 02:07:46,480 and the timing of those two things. So 3085 02:07:44,960 --> 02:07:48,400 really wanting to make sure that 3086 02:07:46,480 --> 02:07:50,480 whichever processes we put in place will 3087 02:07:48,400 --> 02:07:52,320 also work for the sports groups as they 3088 02:07:50,480 --> 02:07:56,800 do their registration communication with 3089 02:07:52,320 --> 02:07:59,040 families etc. Um I think understanding 3090 02:07:56,800 --> 02:08:01,440 the implementation of fees and how we go 3091 02:07:59,040 --> 02:08:05,760 about doing that in a way that um is 3092 02:08:01,440 --> 02:08:07,599 both around uh equity and sustainability 3093 02:08:05,760 --> 02:08:10,079 but also understanding that fees are a 3094 02:08:07,599 --> 02:08:12,639 way to prevent some of the block booking 3095 02:08:10,079 --> 02:08:14,639 um not prevent but reduce uh block 3096 02:08:12,639 --> 02:08:17,199 booking where now if there's no fee 3097 02:08:14,639 --> 02:08:19,280 involved uh sports groups are holding 3098 02:08:17,199 --> 02:08:20,880 entire fields and whether they use it or 3099 02:08:19,280 --> 02:08:24,079 not there's no financial impact to the 3100 02:08:20,880 --> 02:08:25,599 club to do that. So um those are some of 3101 02:08:24,079 --> 02:08:28,159 the conversations I think where there's 3102 02:08:25,599 --> 02:08:30,719 a lot of value. The other one we're 3103 02:08:28,159 --> 02:08:33,760 having is around how we 3104 02:08:30,719 --> 02:08:36,560 manage the historical tenure of large 3105 02:08:33,760 --> 02:08:39,040 sports and the amount of field time they 3106 02:08:36,560 --> 02:08:41,760 need while also trying to create space 3107 02:08:39,040 --> 02:08:43,119 for new sports as they come forward. And 3108 02:08:41,760 --> 02:08:45,520 that's really difficult because 3109 02:08:43,119 --> 02:08:47,679 sometimes it could result in folks um 3110 02:08:45,520 --> 02:08:49,920 having to give up time. Uh so we've 3111 02:08:47,679 --> 02:08:51,760 proposed some ways of managing the 3112 02:08:49,920 --> 02:08:53,599 growth of large sports. so that they 3113 02:08:51,760 --> 02:08:56,400 have limits to the amount of field time 3114 02:08:53,599 --> 02:08:58,000 they can grow in a single year um based 3115 02:08:56,400 --> 02:09:00,079 on a percentage of what they already 3116 02:08:58,000 --> 02:09:02,079 have. Um otherwise they kind of grow 3117 02:09:00,079 --> 02:09:04,560 exponentially and it's really hard for 3118 02:09:02,079 --> 02:09:06,000 small groups to get space. So we've been 3119 02:09:04,560 --> 02:09:08,560 testing some of those really kind of 3120 02:09:06,000 --> 02:09:10,400 detailed specific things with the groups 3121 02:09:08,560 --> 02:09:12,320 um as well as how we establish their 3122 02:09:10,400 --> 02:09:14,159 baselines. So, how do we do an audit at 3123 02:09:12,320 --> 02:09:16,000 the beginning of this process to make 3124 02:09:14,159 --> 02:09:17,760 sure everyone has the appropriate amount 3125 02:09:16,000 --> 02:09:19,760 based on the standards of play for their 3126 02:09:17,760 --> 02:09:21,520 sport and use that as our baseline and 3127 02:09:19,760 --> 02:09:23,440 what an audit process might look like, 3128 02:09:21,520 --> 02:09:25,360 you know, every 5 years. So, I think 3129 02:09:23,440 --> 02:09:26,639 it's in those level of details where the 3130 02:09:25,360 --> 02:09:28,159 sports groups are particularly 3131 02:09:26,639 --> 02:09:29,760 interested and we're particularly 3132 02:09:28,159 --> 02:09:31,840 interested in making sure we don't do 3133 02:09:29,760 --> 02:09:33,760 something that uh throws a wrench in 3134 02:09:31,840 --> 02:09:34,960 their registration plans, timelines, 3135 02:09:33,760 --> 02:09:36,560 etc. 3136 02:09:34,960 --> 02:09:38,960 » Yeah, that's really interesting. It's 3137 02:09:36,560 --> 02:09:40,639 good understanding of how complex the 3138 02:09:38,960 --> 02:09:43,199 whole thing is when you really get down 3139 02:09:40,639 --> 02:09:45,520 to the nuts and bolts of um having it 3140 02:09:43,199 --> 02:09:48,239 get down to various club levels. So, 3141 02:09:45,520 --> 02:09:51,040 thanks for that. 3142 02:09:48,239 --> 02:09:55,360 » Uh thanks uh councelor McCullum uh for 3143 02:09:51,040 --> 02:09:56,880 your comments and uh 3144 02:09:55,360 --> 02:09:59,760 » Excellent. Thank you very much. and 3145 02:09:56,880 --> 02:10:02,960 we'll receive that unanimously uh uh for 3146 02:09:59,760 --> 02:10:07,520 council and we'll move into council uh 3147 02:10:02,960 --> 02:10:11,520 resolutions and um and uh as mayor I do 3148 02:10:07,520 --> 02:10:18,159 have uh the elect respect uh support uh 3149 02:10:11,520 --> 02:10:19,920 motion in front of us um and uh okay 3150 02:10:18,159 --> 02:10:22,639 » Okay it's been moved and seconded we did 3151 02:10:19,920 --> 02:10:24,880 have a discussion uh during the 3152 02:10:22,639 --> 02:10:26,719 delegation portion of this so I think we 3153 02:10:24,880 --> 02:10:28,719 covered most of the topics I'm not sure 3154 02:10:26,719 --> 02:10:30,639 if anybody has any further comments 3155 02:10:28,719 --> 02:10:31,920 they'd like to make and I'll pass over 3156 02:10:30,639 --> 02:10:33,599 to Council Mort. 3157 02:10:31,920 --> 02:10:35,520 » Thanks, Mayor. Um, yeah, I think it's 3158 02:10:33,599 --> 02:10:38,400 all outlined in the motion in terms of 3159 02:10:35,520 --> 02:10:40,560 next steps. Obviously, this is um this 3160 02:10:38,400 --> 02:10:42,159 is, you know, symbolic. We hope that 3161 02:10:40,560 --> 02:10:44,960 people will put it into practice, 3162 02:10:42,159 --> 02:10:47,840 obviously. Um, 3163 02:10:44,960 --> 02:10:51,679 but I know you're going to be sending it 3164 02:10:47,840 --> 02:10:54,639 to UBCM and all those organizations. And 3165 02:10:51,679 --> 02:10:56,719 I'm just looking is it it's going out to 3166 02:10:54,639 --> 02:10:57,920 the other local governments is it or 3167 02:10:56,719 --> 02:11:00,159 » I don't believe the other local 3168 02:10:57,920 --> 02:11:02,000 governments are on this list but that 3169 02:11:00,159 --> 02:11:05,119 could be something that I think would be 3170 02:11:02,000 --> 02:11:06,880 relatively easy to to add uh local 3171 02:11:05,119 --> 02:11:07,280 governments in Komox First Nation 3172 02:11:06,880 --> 02:11:09,280 posture. 3173 02:11:07,280 --> 02:11:11,760 » Yeah. I mean, I know it it means them 3174 02:11:09,280 --> 02:11:13,440 putting it on an agenda and, you know, 3175 02:11:11,760 --> 02:11:15,520 some of the same people looking at it 3176 02:11:13,440 --> 02:11:18,079 again, but I think it would be good to 3177 02:11:15,520 --> 02:11:20,159 have a regional approach. And I I 3178 02:11:18,079 --> 02:11:22,320 thought the comments earlier were were 3179 02:11:20,159 --> 02:11:25,199 good around how this is not about 3180 02:11:22,320 --> 02:11:28,239 shutting down um commentary. It's really 3181 02:11:25,199 --> 02:11:32,400 about um the stuff that crosses the 3182 02:11:28,239 --> 02:11:35,360 line. Um and uh there's a lot of it. And 3183 02:11:32,400 --> 02:11:39,679 um and we've had some local examples. 3184 02:11:35,360 --> 02:11:44,159 We've had some particularly female um uh 3185 02:11:39,679 --> 02:11:47,520 leaders who have uh who've had to um uh 3186 02:11:44,159 --> 02:11:51,119 file police reports etc. Um actually 3187 02:11:47,520 --> 02:11:53,119 we've we've got kind of a um pro um per 3188 02:11:51,119 --> 02:11:55,679 capita I think we have a fairly high 3189 02:11:53,119 --> 02:11:58,719 number for for the limited number of 3190 02:11:55,679 --> 02:12:00,320 elected officials we have um in terms of 3191 02:11:58,719 --> 02:12:03,679 police investigations and things like 3192 02:12:00,320 --> 02:12:05,280 that for harassment. So, um you know, a 3193 02:12:03,679 --> 02:12:07,199 lot of a lot of the stuff that goes on 3194 02:12:05,280 --> 02:12:09,840 people don't don't even hear about, but 3195 02:12:07,199 --> 02:12:11,199 it does happen. So, um I think it'd be 3196 02:12:09,840 --> 02:12:14,000 good to have a united front and I'm 3197 02:12:11,199 --> 02:12:16,880 really hoping that that um although this 3198 02:12:14,000 --> 02:12:18,800 is symbolic and it's a statement that 3199 02:12:16,880 --> 02:12:21,599 people put it into practice because we 3200 02:12:18,800 --> 02:12:23,840 know that words on a screen do does turn 3201 02:12:21,599 --> 02:12:25,360 into behavior, the behaviors that we see 3202 02:12:23,840 --> 02:12:28,320 don't they start somewhere and it's 3203 02:12:25,360 --> 02:12:29,840 usually with those uh uh those uh 3204 02:12:28,320 --> 02:12:31,840 comments. Thanks. 3205 02:12:29,840 --> 02:12:34,960 » Thanks very much. Yeah, I you know the 3206 02:12:31,840 --> 02:12:37,360 idea that um you know the what we really 3207 02:12:34,960 --> 02:12:40,079 want to have as an outcome here is more 3208 02:12:37,360 --> 02:12:43,040 people involved from across the spectrum 3209 02:12:40,079 --> 02:12:45,199 of of all perspectives um but feeling 3210 02:12:43,040 --> 02:12:48,239 comfortable they can they can speak uh 3211 02:12:45,199 --> 02:12:52,000 their mind without uh fear of being 3212 02:12:48,239 --> 02:12:54,159 bullied or intimidated. Uh uh thanks um 3213 02:12:52,000 --> 02:12:57,159 and I don't see any other comments. So 3214 02:12:54,159 --> 02:12:57,159 uh 3215 02:12:57,679 --> 02:13:01,040 » Sorry can I clarify was that a friendly 3216 02:12:59,360 --> 02:13:03,440 amendment or are we leaving the motion 3217 02:13:01,040 --> 02:13:05,040 as is 3218 02:13:03,440 --> 02:13:06,320 » I think a friendly amendment to add 3219 02:13:05,040 --> 02:13:08,400 local governments 3220 02:13:06,320 --> 02:13:12,159 » To add regional local governments and 3221 02:13:08,400 --> 02:13:14,960 comox first nation and the distribution. 3222 02:13:12,159 --> 02:13:16,880 » Thanks for that council morren um and I 3223 02:13:14,960 --> 02:13:20,560 think that that is absolutely 3224 02:13:16,880 --> 02:13:24,000 appropriate. Um and with that uh all 3225 02:13:20,560 --> 02:13:26,880 those in favor? Any opposed? And motion 3226 02:13:24,000 --> 02:13:30,000 carries. And that gets us into uh 3227 02:13:26,880 --> 02:13:32,480 unfinished business. We are at about 12 3228 02:13:30,000 --> 02:13:34,639 after 6. Uh we're at a point where 3229 02:13:32,480 --> 02:13:36,320 there's a potential we could kind of 3230 02:13:34,639 --> 02:13:38,719 power through this and and then have 3231 02:13:36,320 --> 02:13:41,280 dinner. That that's kind of my uh my 3232 02:13:38,719 --> 02:13:44,280 hope. Um and we'll go from there. 3233 02:13:41,280 --> 02:13:44,280 Councelor, 3234 02:13:44,800 --> 02:13:48,480 » I'm just wondering if we want to 3235 02:13:46,079 --> 02:13:50,800 contemplate um varying the agenda just 3236 02:13:48,480 --> 02:13:53,119 for the um first item in the bylaws 3237 02:13:50,800 --> 02:13:55,599 because I think that's mainly what um 3238 02:13:53,119 --> 02:13:57,760 people are here for and then maybe we 3239 02:13:55,599 --> 02:14:00,480 could see from there. I'm not sure if 3240 02:13:57,760 --> 02:14:04,239 that works for staff, 3241 02:14:00,480 --> 02:14:05,760 » Right? Okay. Um yeah, we we have I think 3242 02:14:04,239 --> 02:14:08,320 a couple different groups here. Uh 3243 02:14:05,760 --> 02:14:10,159 » Oh, okay. In that case, maybe we'll just 3244 02:14:08,320 --> 02:14:12,560 leave it as is. These other items are 3245 02:14:10,159 --> 02:14:15,040 pretty small, too. So, the unfinished 3246 02:14:12,560 --> 02:14:16,239 business. So, probably won't take long. 3247 02:14:15,040 --> 02:14:18,159 We can maybe just 3248 02:14:16,239 --> 02:14:19,520 » All right. Well, we'll jump on to 10.1 3249 02:14:18,159 --> 02:14:21,040 and try to move through this fairly 3250 02:14:19,520 --> 02:14:23,920 quickly. That's the Komalt Valley Food 3251 02:14:21,040 --> 02:14:27,280 Policy Council uh from the December 10th 3252 02:14:23,920 --> 02:14:30,480 delegation. Um and there was request for 3253 02:14:27,280 --> 02:14:32,480 $15,000 financial assistance and I'll 3254 02:14:30,480 --> 02:14:35,440 pass it over to Council Morn. 3255 02:14:32,480 --> 02:14:37,199 » Yeah, thanks Mayor. Um I don't think 3256 02:14:35,440 --> 02:14:39,920 we're just basically responding to this 3257 02:14:37,199 --> 02:14:41,360 delegation. Um, 3258 02:14:39,920 --> 02:14:43,840 unfortunately, we didn't really get 3259 02:14:41,360 --> 02:14:46,639 clarification from the group about what 3260 02:14:43,840 --> 02:14:48,480 happened with the funding um through the 3261 02:14:46,639 --> 02:14:49,760 regional district because like, you 3262 02:14:48,480 --> 02:14:52,800 know, I would think this group would be 3263 02:14:49,760 --> 02:14:54,960 able to apply for one of the grants. So, 3264 02:14:52,800 --> 02:15:00,480 um, I'm not quite sure what happened 3265 02:14:54,960 --> 02:15:02,719 there. Um, I know that it's um it's I 3266 02:15:00,480 --> 02:15:05,760 think the I think the presentation 3267 02:15:02,719 --> 02:15:08,079 really outlined some of the some of the 3268 02:15:05,760 --> 02:15:11,280 um the work that that the group would 3269 02:15:08,079 --> 02:15:13,280 like to do with the city in terms of um 3270 02:15:11,280 --> 02:15:15,440 advancing the food systems 3271 02:15:13,280 --> 02:15:18,079 recommendations and the OCP as well as 3272 02:15:15,440 --> 02:15:21,840 some other things that that fit into 3273 02:15:18,079 --> 02:15:23,760 what we're doing. Um they talk about um 3274 02:15:21,840 --> 02:15:25,679 you know the emergency preparedness 3275 02:15:23,760 --> 02:15:28,960 piece which I think also really fits in 3276 02:15:25,679 --> 02:15:32,719 with the with the strategy that Miss Bae 3277 02:15:28,960 --> 02:15:35,199 was talking about earlier um and things 3278 02:15:32,719 --> 02:15:37,679 like the ecosystem resilience and and 3279 02:15:35,199 --> 02:15:40,079 promoting you know pollinator habitat 3280 02:15:37,679 --> 02:15:41,760 and we know that Komox is has a 3281 02:15:40,079 --> 02:15:44,159 designation now and I really don't like 3282 02:15:41,760 --> 02:15:47,760 it when Komox gets a designation before 3283 02:15:44,159 --> 02:15:50,159 we do on these things but um so I guess 3284 02:15:47,760 --> 02:15:52,079 I'm I'm proposing that we do provide a 3285 02:15:50,159 --> 02:15:55,599 little bit of funding. I I recognize 3286 02:15:52,079 --> 02:15:57,199 that um we shouldn't be paying the the 3287 02:15:55,599 --> 02:16:00,000 whole bit and that other local 3288 02:15:57,199 --> 02:16:02,400 governments should step up, but I would 3289 02:16:00,000 --> 02:16:04,800 propose that we 3290 02:16:02,400 --> 02:16:08,800 um I'd like to move that the Komox 3291 02:16:04,800 --> 02:16:12,079 Valley Food Policy Council's request um 3292 02:16:08,800 --> 02:16:13,599 uh be granted for half of that amount, 3293 02:16:12,079 --> 02:16:15,280 not to be included in the motion, but 3294 02:16:13,599 --> 02:16:17,199 $7,500 3295 02:16:15,280 --> 02:16:19,920 to be allocated from the council 3296 02:16:17,199 --> 02:16:21,599 initiatives fund and further that staff 3297 02:16:19,920 --> 02:16:23,440 meet with food policy council members 3298 02:16:21,599 --> 02:16:25,679 for an initial discussion to explore 3299 02:16:23,440 --> 02:16:27,280 potential collaboration to advance 3300 02:16:25,679 --> 02:16:30,239 recommendations in the food systems 3301 02:16:27,280 --> 02:16:32,000 chapter of Courtney's official community 3302 02:16:30,239 --> 02:16:34,639 plan. 3303 02:16:32,000 --> 02:16:37,679 And that's the motion if someone's 3304 02:16:34,639 --> 02:16:39,840 » Okay and I know that that is already in 3305 02:16:37,679 --> 02:16:42,080 our strategic priorities engaging with 3306 02:16:39,840 --> 02:16:44,800 the food policy council to identify 3307 02:16:42,080 --> 02:16:47,920 needs and and I don't anticipate this to 3308 02:16:44,800 --> 02:16:50,800 be a big workload item and recognizing 3309 02:16:47,920 --> 02:16:52,240 we are going to go into a new term but I 3310 02:16:50,800 --> 02:16:54,399 think it would be helpful to start 3311 02:16:52,240 --> 02:16:58,080 having some of those conversations 3312 02:16:54,399 --> 02:17:02,000 before the end of the term just to um 3313 02:16:58,080 --> 02:17:04,639 yeah just to to get that going. um 3314 02:17:02,000 --> 02:17:08,880 recognizing that staff I know is in 3315 02:17:04,639 --> 02:17:10,479 contact with with this council um and 3316 02:17:08,880 --> 02:17:13,359 hoping that other local governments 3317 02:17:10,479 --> 02:17:16,080 maybe come on to to help support some of 3318 02:17:13,359 --> 02:17:18,559 the initiatives that uh the food policy 3319 02:17:16,080 --> 02:17:22,399 council is they actually are doing a lot 3320 02:17:18,559 --> 02:17:24,399 of stuff but it's not that well known 3321 02:17:22,399 --> 02:17:27,679 » And to that end would you want to have 3322 02:17:24,399 --> 02:17:30,719 other local governments included to on 3323 02:17:27,679 --> 02:17:32,559 the um motion if if it passes just so 3324 02:17:30,719 --> 02:17:33,920 that there's um they get that 3325 02:17:32,559 --> 02:17:36,080 information and know 3326 02:17:33,920 --> 02:17:38,399 » I I I'd rather have the Food Policy 3327 02:17:36,080 --> 02:17:41,679 Council leave that up to them to present 3328 02:17:38,399 --> 02:17:42,479 to the other local governments and work 3329 02:17:41,679 --> 02:17:42,800 that out. 3330 02:17:42,479 --> 02:17:45,840 » Okay. 3331 02:17:42,800 --> 02:17:49,439 » Um I did uh I did check quite a while 3332 02:17:45,840 --> 02:17:51,359 ago now with um Mr. Lagmire around um 3333 02:17:49,439 --> 02:17:52,559 what was in the council initiatives 3334 02:17:51,359 --> 02:17:55,519 fund. There is a little bit of money 3335 02:17:52,559 --> 02:17:57,760 still there I believe. So I'm pretty 3336 02:17:55,519 --> 02:18:00,160 sure that's what the answer was before. 3337 02:17:57,760 --> 02:18:02,960 Anyway, that's what I propose and leave 3338 02:18:00,160 --> 02:18:04,240 it open to other comments. Thanks. 3339 02:18:02,960 --> 02:18:07,439 » All right. And Mr. Garby, 3340 02:18:04,240 --> 02:18:08,880 » Uh, sorry, if I may, uh, just want to 3341 02:18:07,439 --> 02:18:10,880 insert myself in this discussion. 3342 02:18:08,880 --> 02:18:12,479 Council, just for council's reference, 3343 02:18:10,880 --> 02:18:15,599 when we did our strategic plan update, 3344 02:18:12,479 --> 02:18:18,800 we did remove working on the FU 3345 02:18:15,599 --> 02:18:20,559 initiatives from the 2026 work. So, we 3346 02:18:18,800 --> 02:18:22,719 don't have staff time dedicated towards 3347 02:18:20,559 --> 02:18:24,399 that. Council may have some monies 3348 02:18:22,719 --> 02:18:27,599 available. I just want to remind council 3349 02:18:24,399 --> 02:18:28,960 of the direction that we had. 3350 02:18:27,599 --> 02:18:33,040 » Sorry, I was thinking that that was 3351 02:18:28,960 --> 02:18:34,719 2025, not 2026. Thanks. 3352 02:18:33,040 --> 02:18:36,240 » Thanks, Councelor Morren and councelor 3353 02:18:34,719 --> 02:18:38,639 F. 3354 02:18:36,240 --> 02:18:40,719 » Yes, generally in favor of the first 3355 02:18:38,639 --> 02:18:42,960 half of the motion on the money. Um, but 3356 02:18:40,719 --> 02:18:46,160 I was going to ask um where we are with 3357 02:18:42,960 --> 02:18:48,240 our count council initiatives um budget 3358 02:18:46,160 --> 02:18:50,639 slash balance. 3359 02:18:48,240 --> 02:18:52,880 » Mr. Legire. 3360 02:18:50,639 --> 02:18:54,880 » Well, being a new year, we have the full 3361 02:18:52,880 --> 02:18:57,040 budget again and the normal budget is 3362 02:18:54,880 --> 02:18:59,200 $75,000 3363 02:18:57,040 --> 02:19:01,040 and the initial 3364 02:18:59,200 --> 02:19:02,639 financial plan committee the whole work 3365 02:19:01,040 --> 02:19:04,160 in November. There's been no changes to 3366 02:19:02,639 --> 02:19:05,599 that number for 26. 3367 02:19:04,160 --> 02:19:10,479 » Okay. Thank you for that. So, that's 3368 02:19:05,599 --> 02:19:14,319 10%. And I I did have a concern about um 3369 02:19:10,479 --> 02:19:16,240 moving to ask staff to to h have more 3370 02:19:14,319 --> 02:19:18,479 discussions with them if it's not on our 3371 02:19:16,240 --> 02:19:21,280 our our current 3372 02:19:18,479 --> 02:19:22,800 priority list. Um so if we're going to 3373 02:19:21,280 --> 02:19:24,479 move forward with this motion, maybe we 3374 02:19:22,800 --> 02:19:26,160 just sever it or I don't know if other 3375 02:19:24,479 --> 02:19:28,880 counselors would support just removing 3376 02:19:26,160 --> 02:19:31,519 that part from the motion and just 3377 02:19:28,880 --> 02:19:33,120 support the first half from now. 3378 02:19:31,519 --> 02:19:35,280 » There's no request to sever it. We we 3379 02:19:33,120 --> 02:19:37,760 can just separate it. Well, I'll see 3380 02:19:35,280 --> 02:19:37,760 what happens. 3381 02:19:37,840 --> 02:19:42,479 Yeah, I I would say let's sever it and 3382 02:19:40,080 --> 02:19:45,920 and and then we can call questions and 3383 02:19:42,479 --> 02:19:47,679 and move through it. Um 3384 02:19:45,920 --> 02:19:49,840 yeah, council horn, did you want to 3385 02:19:47,679 --> 02:19:53,600 speak to it? 3386 02:19:49,840 --> 02:19:55,520 » I just want to send it to 3387 02:19:53,600 --> 02:19:58,080 » Okay. 3388 02:19:55,520 --> 02:20:01,080 » All right. And 3389 02:19:58,080 --> 02:20:01,080 Miss 3390 02:20:01,439 --> 02:20:04,560 Councelor McCullum, 3391 02:20:02,880 --> 02:20:06,560 » You can call me Miss McCullum if you 3392 02:20:04,560 --> 02:20:07,680 want. There were other lights on so but 3393 02:20:06,560 --> 02:20:10,960 they've gone off now. 3394 02:20:07,680 --> 02:20:13,680 » Um yeah, I think that this is reasonable 3395 02:20:10,960 --> 02:20:15,600 to um [clears throat] provide uh the 3396 02:20:13,680 --> 02:20:18,640 funding that's been put forward by 3397 02:20:15,600 --> 02:20:22,160 councelor Morren. Um I I am supportive 3398 02:20:18,640 --> 02:20:26,880 of the work that this um food policy 3399 02:20:22,160 --> 02:20:29,439 council is looking to do, but um I also 3400 02:20:26,880 --> 02:20:31,359 recognize that you know we're being 3401 02:20:29,439 --> 02:20:35,040 asked as far as I can tell from the 3402 02:20:31,359 --> 02:20:38,720 budget that they provided to um 3403 02:20:35,040 --> 02:20:42,080 fund um all of their um financial ask. 3404 02:20:38,720 --> 02:20:44,720 um as the rest of the slide is um in 3405 02:20:42,080 --> 02:20:46,399 kind at least that's my understanding 3406 02:20:44,720 --> 02:20:50,000 from what they provided but I am filling 3407 02:20:46,399 --> 02:20:51,840 in some blanks there. So um much of the 3408 02:20:50,000 --> 02:20:54,000 work that they're doing is is for the 3409 02:20:51,840 --> 02:20:56,319 whole region and of course um city of 3410 02:20:54,000 --> 02:20:59,520 Courtney benefits from that but um we 3411 02:20:56,319 --> 02:21:01,840 are not uh the only organization that 3412 02:20:59,520 --> 02:21:04,399 exists um to support this work. So I 3413 02:21:01,840 --> 02:21:06,880 think this is a good compromise. Um, so 3414 02:21:04,399 --> 02:21:10,319 I'm happy to support that and I am in 3415 02:21:06,880 --> 02:21:12,960 agreement um that that second piece of 3416 02:21:10,319 --> 02:21:17,520 organizing a council meeting um between 3417 02:21:12,960 --> 02:21:20,160 council and the food policy is it's a it 3418 02:21:17,520 --> 02:21:22,560 it's often not recognized or not obvious 3419 02:21:20,160 --> 02:21:24,560 to us um how much work that creates for 3420 02:21:22,560 --> 02:21:27,040 staff when we set those up and we are in 3421 02:21:24,560 --> 02:21:28,960 the um final months of the term. So, I 3422 02:21:27,040 --> 02:21:30,800 think if that's like a coordinated 3423 02:21:28,960 --> 02:21:33,920 effort that the next council wants to do 3424 02:21:30,800 --> 02:21:35,680 with this uh with the food policy 3425 02:21:33,920 --> 02:21:39,120 council, that would make good sense to 3426 02:21:35,680 --> 02:21:40,800 do at a later date. So, um that's my 3427 02:21:39,120 --> 02:21:42,800 thinking when we vote on the two 3428 02:21:40,800 --> 02:21:44,240 motions. Thanks. 3429 02:21:42,800 --> 02:21:45,359 » Great. Thanks for that. And back to you, 3430 02:21:44,240 --> 02:21:48,319 Council Moore. 3431 02:21:45,359 --> 02:21:51,680 » Thanks. Um could I just clarify whether 3432 02:21:48,319 --> 02:21:54,880 staff is devoting any time at all in 3433 02:21:51,680 --> 02:21:57,439 meeting with the council around I mean 3434 02:21:54,880 --> 02:22:00,560 informal I don't know I guess I'm just 3435 02:21:57,439 --> 02:22:02,240 curious whether any of this these 3436 02:22:00,560 --> 02:22:04,640 conversations are already happening. I'm 3437 02:22:02,240 --> 02:22:06,399 fine to have the the motion severed um 3438 02:22:04,640 --> 02:22:08,560 and just provide the funding and then 3439 02:22:06,399 --> 02:22:11,920 ask the food policy council to go to the 3440 02:22:08,560 --> 02:22:13,920 other local governments 3441 02:22:11,920 --> 02:22:16,080 » Through the mayor councelor Morin. Uh 3442 02:22:13,920 --> 02:22:17,840 the food policy council also has been 3443 02:22:16,080 --> 02:22:20,160 invited as a part of the better together 3444 02:22:17,840 --> 02:22:22,319 strategy. So we do have staff engagement 3445 02:22:20,160 --> 02:22:24,479 with the food policy council and we 3446 02:22:22,319 --> 02:22:26,960 engage on certain topics as they come 3447 02:22:24,479 --> 02:22:29,760 up. um but there isn't a concerted 3448 02:22:26,960 --> 02:22:31,840 effort to coordinate particular pieces 3449 02:22:29,760 --> 02:22:34,080 of work or advance particular pieces of 3450 02:22:31,840 --> 02:22:37,120 work uh since the strategic priorities 3451 02:22:34,080 --> 02:22:38,720 were adjusted. So our priority uh prior 3452 02:22:37,120 --> 02:22:40,560 to that was the community garden and 3453 02:22:38,720 --> 02:22:43,200 making sure that that service agreement 3454 02:22:40,560 --> 02:22:45,439 was in place and that we had uh renewed 3455 02:22:43,200 --> 02:22:47,280 that agreement and then planning uh for 3456 02:22:45,439 --> 02:22:49,120 the future of the community garden uh 3457 02:22:47,280 --> 02:22:50,880 which of course is part of some 3458 02:22:49,120 --> 02:22:52,640 recommendations in the OCP but not 3459 02:22:50,880 --> 02:22:54,720 necessarily specific to the food policy 3460 02:22:52,640 --> 02:22:56,479 council but we do engage with them sort 3461 02:22:54,720 --> 02:22:58,640 of intermittently and on other sort of 3462 02:22:56,479 --> 02:22:59,359 broader initiatives and I don't know if 3463 02:22:58,640 --> 02:23:01,280 um 3464 02:22:59,359 --> 02:23:03,280 » Yeah I just wanted to to just clarify 3465 02:23:01,280 --> 02:23:04,960 that the community garden is lush and 3466 02:23:03,280 --> 02:23:07,200 food policy council is different because 3467 02:23:04,960 --> 02:23:10,399 that's been very confusing over the 3468 02:23:07,200 --> 02:23:12,319 years. Okay. Thank you. 3469 02:23:10,399 --> 02:23:14,080 » All right. Uh that being said, uh the 3470 02:23:12,319 --> 02:23:17,359 motions are severed. So we'll start with 3471 02:23:14,080 --> 02:23:19,120 motion the first motion for the $7,500. 3472 02:23:17,359 --> 02:23:21,520 Uh I think that's clear for everybody. 3473 02:23:19,120 --> 02:23:26,840 All those in favor. 3474 02:23:21,520 --> 02:23:26,840 Any opposed? And that motion uh carries. 3475 02:23:27,600 --> 02:23:31,680 Yeah. Well, we'll just vote on the 3476 02:23:29,280 --> 02:23:34,000 second motion uh directing staff to meet 3477 02:23:31,680 --> 02:23:35,439 with food policy. Uh, all those in 3478 02:23:34,000 --> 02:23:38,080 favor? 3479 02:23:35,439 --> 02:23:40,479 » Any opposed? And there we go. We've 3480 02:23:38,080 --> 02:23:42,880 deleted it now. So, 3481 02:23:40,479 --> 02:23:44,560 I know I know. 3482 02:23:42,880 --> 02:23:46,720 » Yes. 3483 02:23:44,560 --> 02:23:48,000 » Did you Did Council vote in favor or 3484 02:23:46,720 --> 02:23:50,960 were you opposed? 3485 02:23:48,000 --> 02:23:52,720 » Well, I would have rather vote on it. 3486 02:23:50,960 --> 02:23:53,120 So, 3487 02:23:52,720 --> 02:23:55,439 » Yeah, 3488 02:23:53,120 --> 02:23:56,960 » I think it was unanimously opposed. 3489 02:23:55,439 --> 02:23:58,560 Yeah, Mr. Garin. 3490 02:23:56,960 --> 02:24:00,080 » Thank you, Mayor. 3491 02:23:58,560 --> 02:24:02,319 In the materials that was provided us, 3492 02:24:00,080 --> 02:24:04,080 there's an indication that the the CVD 3493 02:24:02,319 --> 02:24:06,640 was going to reduce the budget. I I 3494 02:24:04,080 --> 02:24:09,120 don't I not wish the CVD was the budget 3495 02:24:06,640 --> 02:24:11,920 reduced and does council support 3496 02:24:09,120 --> 02:24:13,520 spending this money subject to the CVRD 3497 02:24:11,920 --> 02:24:17,120 and and my apologies. I was trying to 3498 02:24:13,520 --> 02:24:19,439 just get clarification as we have done 3499 02:24:17,120 --> 02:24:21,520 that in the past with with other 3500 02:24:19,439 --> 02:24:25,439 funding. So I I'm sorry if if that 3501 02:24:21,520 --> 02:24:27,600 matter has gone forward that I know. 3502 02:24:25,439 --> 02:24:30,000 » Yeah. 3503 02:24:27,600 --> 02:24:32,240 I I I think I think that uh yeah, I 3504 02:24:30,000 --> 02:24:34,319 think we passed that point, but uh 3505 02:24:32,240 --> 02:24:36,000 definitely it's you know, I'll look to 3506 02:24:34,319 --> 02:24:38,640 our uh directors at the regional 3507 02:24:36,000 --> 02:24:40,240 district who can um if something changed 3508 02:24:38,640 --> 02:24:44,880 there, then they they can let us know as 3509 02:24:40,240 --> 02:24:48,560 well. Um moving on to 10.2 2 um endure 3510 02:24:44,880 --> 02:24:52,720 projects palace place um and there is 3511 02:24:48,560 --> 02:24:55,840 the request um about the tax exemption 3512 02:24:52,720 --> 02:24:58,319 um and so there was a another followup 3513 02:24:55,840 --> 02:25:00,160 uh from before and so I'll pass it over 3514 02:24:58,319 --> 02:25:02,640 to any council members that would like 3515 02:25:00,160 --> 02:25:04,720 to speak to this matter and councelor 3516 02:25:02,640 --> 02:25:06,479 Helen. 3517 02:25:04,720 --> 02:25:10,000 Yeah, thanks Mayor. I I just wanted to 3518 02:25:06,479 --> 02:25:12,000 ask staff if uh if we did look at option 3519 02:25:10,000 --> 02:25:15,760 two, what's the significance of 3520 02:25:12,000 --> 02:25:19,720 specifying u retroactive versus going 3521 02:25:15,760 --> 02:25:19,720 forward from 2026? 3522 02:25:22,479 --> 02:25:25,479 » Uh 3523 02:25:28,880 --> 02:25:35,439 uh thanks very much. So sorry, I'm just 3524 02:25:30,960 --> 02:25:35,439 pulling up the correspondence again. 3525 02:25:35,520 --> 02:25:40,640 So essentially there were the the 3526 02:25:39,200 --> 02:25:43,520 the request was essentially to 3527 02:25:40,640 --> 02:25:46,800 reconsider the uh level of the t the tax 3528 02:25:43,520 --> 02:25:48,240 exemption itself. Um in order to for 3529 02:25:46,800 --> 02:25:50,479 council to reconsider it, you would have 3530 02:25:48,240 --> 02:25:52,960 to rescend your previous motions or 3531 02:25:50,479 --> 02:25:55,280 reconsider your previous motions through 3532 02:25:52,960 --> 02:25:58,319 a rule to suspend a motion to suspend 3533 02:25:55,280 --> 02:26:00,800 the rule which would require um more 3534 02:25:58,319 --> 02:26:02,880 than the majority of council to support. 3535 02:26:00,800 --> 02:26:04,720 Even then, I would prefer to get a bit 3536 02:26:02,880 --> 02:26:07,600 more direction from council to explore 3537 02:26:04,720 --> 02:26:09,600 the legal options as far as how we could 3538 02:26:07,600 --> 02:26:11,280 go about that. Essentially, the 3539 02:26:09,600 --> 02:26:12,720 information that I have around whether 3540 02:26:11,280 --> 02:26:15,359 or not council has the ability to 3541 02:26:12,720 --> 02:26:18,880 reconsider it right now is that you 3542 02:26:15,359 --> 02:26:20,479 really don't. Um that said, if you want 3543 02:26:18,880 --> 02:26:23,439 me to see whether or not there's 3544 02:26:20,479 --> 02:26:26,319 opportunities to um pass that motion to 3545 02:26:23,439 --> 02:26:28,560 suspend the rules, which is not the 3546 02:26:26,319 --> 02:26:30,479 question I had asked of our our legal 3547 02:26:28,560 --> 02:26:32,000 counsel at the beginning, um that's 3548 02:26:30,479 --> 02:26:34,399 something I could definitely go ahead 3549 02:26:32,000 --> 02:26:36,080 and do. However, the effect we're able 3550 02:26:34,399 --> 02:26:38,160 to undertake that would be the same 3551 02:26:36,080 --> 02:26:40,960 where the previous tax exemptions would 3552 02:26:38,160 --> 02:26:43,439 be removed. the developer would be 3553 02:26:40,960 --> 02:26:45,920 required to repay the taxes that had 3554 02:26:43,439 --> 02:26:48,160 been previously exempted and the new 3555 02:26:45,920 --> 02:26:50,960 exemption would only apply to future tax 3556 02:26:48,160 --> 02:26:52,640 years. So the question still is council 3557 02:26:50,960 --> 02:26:54,880 would not really have an opportunity to 3558 02:26:52,640 --> 02:26:58,000 make the taxes whole or the exemption 3559 02:26:54,880 --> 02:27:00,080 whole in that case. Um and that option 3560 02:26:58,000 --> 02:27:01,600 as well has not been explored with the 3561 02:27:00,080 --> 02:27:03,840 requester as to whether or not that 3562 02:27:01,600 --> 02:27:06,160 would be an acceptable resolution at the 3563 02:27:03,840 --> 02:27:09,120 end of it. So if council would like to 3564 02:27:06,160 --> 02:27:11,760 explore all potential options within um 3565 02:27:09,120 --> 02:27:14,479 our our authorities, I would need 3566 02:27:11,760 --> 02:27:18,319 direction to undertake that work. 3567 02:27:14,479 --> 02:27:20,640 » Yeah, my inclination is is to uh 3568 02:27:18,319 --> 02:27:22,880 ask for a report with options going 3569 02:27:20,640 --> 02:27:24,399 forward rather than retroactively, but 3570 02:27:22,880 --> 02:27:26,960 I'll see what other people think. 3571 02:27:24,399 --> 02:27:30,160 Thanks. 3572 02:27:26,960 --> 02:27:31,040 » Uh thanks Councelor Alen and Councelor 3573 02:27:30,160 --> 02:27:33,680 Brush. 3574 02:27:31,040 --> 02:27:36,720 » Yeah, thanks Mayor. Um, as I stated at 3575 02:27:33,680 --> 02:27:38,560 the last meeting, uh, I'm also inclined 3576 02:27:36,720 --> 02:27:41,520 to ask [clears throat] staff to report 3577 02:27:38,560 --> 02:27:45,520 back with options to provide, um, the 3578 02:27:41,520 --> 02:27:47,840 revitaliz revitalization tax exemption. 3579 02:27:45,520 --> 02:27:50,080 And, um, my reasoning for that was 3580 02:27:47,840 --> 02:27:51,600 stated last time that we put this bylaw 3581 02:27:50,080 --> 02:27:53,040 through to get this exact development, 3582 02:27:51,600 --> 02:27:56,800 we got this development, and somewhere 3583 02:27:53,040 --> 02:28:00,479 along the line it didn't work out uh, to 3584 02:27:56,800 --> 02:28:02,240 fit the bylaw. So, um, and I am also 3585 02:28:00,479 --> 02:28:04,720 inclined to just move forward and do the 3586 02:28:02,240 --> 02:28:05,920 best we can. Um, so my apologies. I 3587 02:28:04,720 --> 02:28:09,120 don't think I'm going to support 3588 02:28:05,920 --> 02:28:11,840 retroactively, but, um, I'd like to get 3589 02:28:09,120 --> 02:28:14,880 staff to report back on 100% tax 3590 02:28:11,840 --> 02:28:18,080 revitalization exemption to Palace Place 3591 02:28:14,880 --> 02:28:21,680 um, from or for 2026, I believe, would 3592 02:28:18,080 --> 02:28:24,000 be the right wording for that. 3593 02:28:21,680 --> 02:28:25,280 » Okay. And is are you making a movement? 3594 02:28:24,000 --> 02:28:26,080 » Sure. I'll make that a motion if that's 3595 02:28:25,280 --> 02:28:29,280 okay. 3596 02:28:26,080 --> 02:28:30,479 » Okay. So that's motion now. Okay. And do 3597 02:28:29,280 --> 02:28:31,840 you want to speak any further to 3598 02:28:30,479 --> 02:28:32,880 » No, that's fine. Thanks. I'll leave it 3599 02:28:31,840 --> 02:28:34,880 up. 3600 02:28:32,880 --> 02:28:37,120 » And 3601 02:28:34,880 --> 02:28:40,080 Councilman, 3602 02:28:37,120 --> 02:28:42,000 » Yeah. Um 3603 02:28:40,080 --> 02:28:44,399 my recollection is we had a pretty 3604 02:28:42,000 --> 02:28:49,040 detailed discussion around this um once 3605 02:28:44,399 --> 02:28:52,880 already. um I received information that 3606 02:28:49,040 --> 02:28:56,160 um you know there was maybe a different 3607 02:28:52,880 --> 02:28:58,080 way to have calculated it and perhaps 3608 02:28:56,160 --> 02:29:00,080 our bylaw should look at other things. I 3609 02:28:58,080 --> 02:29:02,000 I think we are doing a review of it 3610 02:29:00,080 --> 02:29:05,920 through the downtown local area plan 3611 02:29:02,000 --> 02:29:07,520 currently. So I don't see a need to 3612 02:29:05,920 --> 02:29:10,000 provide further direction on that right 3613 02:29:07,520 --> 02:29:12,240 now. We we have already directed uh 3614 02:29:10,000 --> 02:29:14,399 staff to come back on that and uh I 3615 02:29:12,240 --> 02:29:17,920 don't have an appetite to review this 3616 02:29:14,399 --> 02:29:20,960 again. um this is not the not the first 3617 02:29:17,920 --> 02:29:23,760 time it's come here and um I think that 3618 02:29:20,960 --> 02:29:26,720 it was handled as fairly with um the 3619 02:29:23,760 --> 02:29:31,120 information that we had at the time and 3620 02:29:26,720 --> 02:29:33,920 my inclination is that um we focus on 3621 02:29:31,120 --> 02:29:36,720 providing 3622 02:29:33,920 --> 02:29:39,120 fast turnaround with applications for 3623 02:29:36,720 --> 02:29:41,920 downtown development and that um we get 3624 02:29:39,120 --> 02:29:43,680 we get rid of this or adjust it in some 3625 02:29:41,920 --> 02:29:45,359 way because um I don't I don't think 3626 02:29:43,680 --> 02:29:47,840 it's actually done what we've wanted it 3627 02:29:45,359 --> 02:29:49,840 to in the 8 years I've been on council 3628 02:29:47,840 --> 02:29:51,840 and I'm inclined to take a different 3629 02:29:49,840 --> 02:29:53,920 approach and I think we'll be getting 3630 02:29:51,840 --> 02:29:56,240 some more information around that at 3631 02:29:53,920 --> 02:29:59,680 some point and I'm happy to discuss that 3632 02:29:56,240 --> 02:30:01,840 then. Thanks. 3633 02:29:59,680 --> 02:30:03,040 » Thanks. Thanks for that comment. Um I 3634 02:30:01,840 --> 02:30:05,760 don't see any further questions or 3635 02:30:03,040 --> 02:30:08,240 comments at this point. Um I saw a 3636 02:30:05,760 --> 02:30:09,680 movement there but uh uh seeing that 3637 02:30:08,240 --> 02:30:11,439 there's no further questions or 3638 02:30:09,680 --> 02:30:13,600 comments, I'll call the question. All 3639 02:30:11,439 --> 02:30:16,800 those in favor of the motion on the 3640 02:30:13,600 --> 02:30:19,120 screen. Any opposed? 3641 02:30:16,800 --> 02:30:22,720 And motion carries with councelor Moore 3642 02:30:19,120 --> 02:30:26,000 and councelor McCollum opposed. 3643 02:30:22,720 --> 02:30:30,319 And um 3644 02:30:26,000 --> 02:30:34,479 uh next we have uh item 11.1.1 amenity 3645 02:30:30,319 --> 02:30:38,080 cost charges bylaw number 3207. 3646 02:30:34,479 --> 02:30:40,160 And um I'll pass over to Miss Okcon. 3647 02:30:38,080 --> 02:30:41,520 » Uh thanks very much. So, as you may 3648 02:30:40,160 --> 02:30:43,040 recall, at the last meeting, council 3649 02:30:41,520 --> 02:30:45,760 provided direction to staff to bring 3650 02:30:43,040 --> 02:30:49,120 forward the bylaw to um undertake and 3651 02:30:45,760 --> 02:30:50,800 authorize the ECC uh charges. So, that 3652 02:30:49,120 --> 02:30:52,560 is the bylaw that is before council 3653 02:30:50,800 --> 02:30:55,120 based on the the decisions made at the 3654 02:30:52,560 --> 02:30:57,359 previous meeting. Um I have support from 3655 02:30:55,120 --> 02:30:59,120 Nancy Henderson here who from urban 3656 02:30:57,359 --> 02:31:00,479 systems who has substantially been who's 3657 02:30:59,120 --> 02:31:02,720 been substantially involved in this 3658 02:31:00,479 --> 02:31:04,240 project in order to help answer any 3659 02:31:02,720 --> 02:31:06,240 technical questions that council may 3660 02:31:04,240 --> 02:31:08,479 have. The cover report really just 3661 02:31:06,240 --> 02:31:09,680 outlines some of the background. um is a 3662 02:31:08,479 --> 02:31:11,920 reminder of some of the options that 3663 02:31:09,680 --> 02:31:13,680 were considered in the policy discussion 3664 02:31:11,920 --> 02:31:16,240 and essentially sums it up into where we 3665 02:31:13,680 --> 02:31:17,840 are today and then includes uh we're 3666 02:31:16,240 --> 02:31:20,319 seeking direction from council to twin 3667 02:31:17,840 --> 02:31:22,720 the timing of the ACC bylaw final 3668 02:31:20,319 --> 02:31:25,040 adoption reading with the DCC bylaw 3669 02:31:22,720 --> 02:31:28,080 final adoption reading upon its return 3670 02:31:25,040 --> 02:31:30,399 from uh the minister's office and or 3671 02:31:28,080 --> 02:31:32,080 sorry the inspector's office and 3672 02:31:30,399 --> 02:31:35,040 essentially the intent of that twinning 3673 02:31:32,080 --> 02:31:36,640 or that combined time is to provide some 3674 02:31:35,040 --> 02:31:38,479 anticipatable and an ease of 3675 02:31:36,640 --> 02:31:40,240 implementation So we're not having to 3676 02:31:38,479 --> 02:31:41,600 phase in different cost charges at 3677 02:31:40,240 --> 02:31:43,439 different times, but actually aligning 3678 02:31:41,600 --> 02:31:47,920 them together to have one calculation 3679 02:31:43,439 --> 02:31:48,720 and one impact at at the same time. 3680 02:31:47,920 --> 02:31:50,319 » Okay. 3681 02:31:48,720 --> 02:31:52,640 » All right. Uh thanks very much for that. 3682 02:31:50,319 --> 02:31:56,200 I'll look to council and I have 3683 02:31:52,640 --> 02:31:56,200 councelor Helian. 3684 02:31:56,240 --> 02:32:01,200 » I suppose I have one technical question. 3685 02:31:58,240 --> 02:32:05,560 If this uh was passed, how long would it 3686 02:32:01,200 --> 02:32:05,560 take for it actually to be implemented? 3687 02:32:09,520 --> 02:32:13,359 through the chair. I mean, in terms of 3688 02:32:11,359 --> 02:32:15,120 the implementation of the bylaw, as soon 3689 02:32:13,359 --> 02:32:17,200 as it's adopted, it could come into 3690 02:32:15,120 --> 02:32:20,080 effect. Council has the option to have a 3691 02:32:17,200 --> 02:32:22,240 grace period if you wish. Um, however, 3692 02:32:20,080 --> 02:32:24,640 the intention, as noted by Miss 3693 02:32:22,240 --> 02:32:27,040 Okonnell, was to bring it in alignment 3694 02:32:24,640 --> 02:32:29,600 with the DCC adoption. So, that's 3695 02:32:27,040 --> 02:32:31,439 currently with the ministry. So, when we 3696 02:32:29,600 --> 02:32:33,200 hear back from them, the idea would be 3697 02:32:31,439 --> 02:32:35,840 the adoption would happen at the same 3698 02:32:33,200 --> 02:32:38,080 time. That being said, in terms of the 3699 02:32:35,840 --> 02:32:41,120 implementation of the charges, there is 3700 02:32:38,080 --> 02:32:43,120 an instream protection for applications 3701 02:32:41,120 --> 02:32:46,399 that are instream with the city. So the 3702 02:32:43,120 --> 02:32:49,520 first year of the bylaw, um the inflow 3703 02:32:46,399 --> 02:32:51,840 of charges would be relatively slow. Um 3704 02:32:49,520 --> 02:32:53,439 and then that would over time uh 3705 02:32:51,840 --> 02:32:55,359 increase. So there's a bit of a there's 3706 02:32:53,439 --> 02:32:57,920 a couple doublegged approach to that 3707 02:32:55,359 --> 02:33:00,080 answer, if you will. and and that one 3708 02:32:57,920 --> 02:33:01,760 year sorry uh that one year because 3709 02:33:00,080 --> 02:33:03,280 that's what I remember from the DCC is 3710 02:33:01,760 --> 02:33:04,720 there would be I don't know if it was a 3711 02:33:03,280 --> 02:33:07,600 one-year grace period but there would be 3712 02:33:04,720 --> 02:33:09,760 that one-year buffer so just so we're 3713 02:33:07,600 --> 02:33:10,800 because what I heard was almost a a 3714 02:33:09,760 --> 02:33:14,080 little bit of this and a little bit of 3715 02:33:10,800 --> 02:33:16,560 that. Uh so just to be crystal clear is 3716 02:33:14,080 --> 02:33:20,720 that one-year buffer going to be applied 3717 02:33:16,560 --> 02:33:23,439 to DCC the new DCC's and the new ACC is 3718 02:33:20,720 --> 02:33:25,840 that how it would be looked at? 3719 02:33:23,439 --> 02:33:28,000 » Yeah, Mr. Mayor. So the there's actually 3720 02:33:25,840 --> 02:33:30,800 a difference in terminology between 3721 02:33:28,000 --> 02:33:33,359 grace period and the instream protection 3722 02:33:30,800 --> 02:33:35,280 just to be clear. So grace period would 3723 02:33:33,359 --> 02:33:38,000 be and you could do this with your DCC 3724 02:33:35,280 --> 02:33:40,000 VA if you wish is you could adopt it on 3725 02:33:38,000 --> 02:33:42,240 February 1st and say it's going to come 3726 02:33:40,000 --> 02:33:44,479 into effect on April 1st. 3727 02:33:42,240 --> 02:33:46,399 » Uh the instream protection is from the 3728 02:33:44,479 --> 02:33:48,800 date of the adoption of the bylaw. So 3729 02:33:46,399 --> 02:33:51,120 even if you have that grace period that 3730 02:33:48,800 --> 02:33:52,880 instream uh protection would take place 3731 02:33:51,120 --> 02:33:54,319 from the adoption of the bylaw. If you 3732 02:33:52,880 --> 02:33:57,439 have those complete precursor 3733 02:33:54,319 --> 02:33:59,520 applications in, they uh would have the 3734 02:33:57,439 --> 02:34:02,319 one year to get their building permit 3735 02:33:59,520 --> 02:34:04,000 essentially issued and then if they can 3736 02:34:02,319 --> 02:34:07,359 do that in the one year, then they would 3737 02:34:04,000 --> 02:34:10,560 not be subjected to the ACC. 3738 02:34:07,359 --> 02:34:12,720 » Okay. So, I think that clarifies for me. 3739 02:34:10,560 --> 02:34:14,160 Sorry, Councelor Hillian. Does it do you 3740 02:34:12,720 --> 02:34:16,240 have a follow-up or 3741 02:34:14,160 --> 02:34:20,000 » I I wanted to make some comments. Uh Mr. 3742 02:34:16,240 --> 02:34:22,399 Mayor, people will recall that uh when 3743 02:34:20,000 --> 02:34:25,520 we dealt with this in December, we had a 3744 02:34:22,399 --> 02:34:26,880 lot of uh um letters that were received 3745 02:34:25,520 --> 02:34:29,520 from members of the development 3746 02:34:26,880 --> 02:34:33,280 community expressing concern about the 3747 02:34:29,520 --> 02:34:36,479 direction council was going and um there 3748 02:34:33,280 --> 02:34:40,080 was a also a view expressed that there 3749 02:34:36,479 --> 02:34:43,359 hadn't been adequate uh engagement with 3750 02:34:40,080 --> 02:34:45,439 the development community. Um some of us 3751 02:34:43,359 --> 02:34:46,880 did have the opportunity to meet with 3752 02:34:45,439 --> 02:34:49,920 representatives of the development 3753 02:34:46,880 --> 02:34:51,920 community um since then and I just 3754 02:34:49,920 --> 02:34:54,800 wanted to share some of the uh um 3755 02:34:51,920 --> 02:34:58,640 feedback that uh was received and ask 3756 02:34:54,800 --> 02:35:02,000 staff to to comment on it to help us uh 3757 02:34:58,640 --> 02:35:04,479 uh come to a decision on this. Um um so 3758 02:35:02,000 --> 02:35:07,280 first of all, one of the assertions was 3759 02:35:04,479 --> 02:35:10,160 that the growth pro projections that uh 3760 02:35:07,280 --> 02:35:14,560 we're we're working with are unlikely to 3761 02:35:10,160 --> 02:35:18,479 be met due to the slowdown in both in 3762 02:35:14,560 --> 02:35:22,560 migration and other economic factors. um 3763 02:35:18,479 --> 02:35:25,280 that that the smallcale multi-unit uh uh 3764 02:35:22,560 --> 02:35:29,120 legislation and and uh process won't 3765 02:35:25,280 --> 02:35:30,880 provide the housing projected u as uh 3766 02:35:29,120 --> 02:35:33,680 many local builders don't see it as 3767 02:35:30,880 --> 02:35:36,640 economical to build. Uh there's a view 3768 02:35:33,680 --> 02:35:39,680 that the market can't absorb the uh $200 3769 02:35:36,640 --> 02:35:44,880 million project cost that uh that we've 3770 02:35:39,680 --> 02:35:47,920 uh identified. Um there's a view that um 3771 02:35:44,880 --> 02:35:52,720 our staff reports didn't accurately uh 3772 02:35:47,920 --> 02:35:55,280 portray developer feedback. Um and um 3773 02:35:52,720 --> 02:35:57,120 there is um 3774 02:35:55,280 --> 02:36:00,479 I think a desire for more robust 3775 02:35:57,120 --> 02:36:03,439 engagement on an ongoing basis. Um 3776 02:36:00,479 --> 02:36:07,040 there's also a concern that um some of 3777 02:36:03,439 --> 02:36:10,000 the consultants might not have um uh 3778 02:36:07,040 --> 02:36:13,120 have as sufficient local knowledge of 3779 02:36:10,000 --> 02:36:14,800 market conditions and such. Um and that 3780 02:36:13,120 --> 02:36:17,520 the benefit of our local builder 3781 02:36:14,800 --> 02:36:20,399 knowledge hasn't been realized in uh 3782 02:36:17,520 --> 02:36:23,200 staff and council deliberations on this 3783 02:36:20,399 --> 02:36:25,680 uh on these bylaws. 3784 02:36:23,200 --> 02:36:27,920 Um there's a view that the fees really 3785 02:36:25,680 --> 02:36:30,800 do need to reflect what the market can 3786 02:36:27,920 --> 02:36:34,720 bear. Um and that developers are dealing 3787 02:36:30,800 --> 02:36:37,840 with not just these uh proposals but um 3788 02:36:34,720 --> 02:36:41,280 a 25% increase uh related to seismic 3789 02:36:37,840 --> 02:36:44,560 upgrades, step code increases, other uh 3790 02:36:41,280 --> 02:36:47,280 regulations and fees that uh that make 3791 02:36:44,560 --> 02:36:50,640 development more challenging. Uh it was 3792 02:36:47,280 --> 02:36:52,399 expressed that um there there at least a 3793 02:36:50,640 --> 02:36:55,920 couple of projects in town that wouldn't 3794 02:36:52,399 --> 02:37:00,800 have been built um if in fact uh these 3795 02:36:55,920 --> 02:37:02,560 rates had been in effect. Um and uh one 3796 02:37:00,800 --> 02:37:04,800 of the primary reasons is that the banks 3797 02:37:02,560 --> 02:37:07,520 simply won't finance 3798 02:37:04,800 --> 02:37:09,920 um some of the costs that are involved. 3799 02:37:07,520 --> 02:37:12,560 And um questions were asked about 3800 02:37:09,920 --> 02:37:14,960 whether we can trim the project list. Um 3801 02:37:12,560 --> 02:37:16,479 to what extent uh members of the de 3802 02:37:14,960 --> 02:37:19,200 development community can be at the 3803 02:37:16,479 --> 02:37:21,120 table and uh are there ways to make the 3804 02:37:19,200 --> 02:37:24,160 rates dynamic to react to market 3805 02:37:21,120 --> 02:37:27,840 conditions. Um, those are some of the 3806 02:37:24,160 --> 02:37:29,280 primary uh messages that that uh that I 3807 02:37:27,840 --> 02:37:32,080 heard and and I'd just be really 3808 02:37:29,280 --> 02:37:34,399 interested in uh other counselor's 3809 02:37:32,080 --> 02:37:37,399 comments and what staff might respond. 3810 02:37:34,399 --> 02:37:37,399 Thanks. 3811 02:37:37,920 --> 02:37:42,960 » Um, Miss Okonnell, 3812 02:37:40,080 --> 02:37:46,240 » Uh, thanks very much. So, um, for 3813 02:37:42,960 --> 02:37:47,680 councelor Hillian, there's, uh, the 3814 02:37:46,240 --> 02:37:49,760 items that you've just spoken to, and 3815 02:37:47,680 --> 02:37:53,120 I've done my best to try and jot them 3816 02:37:49,760 --> 02:37:56,399 all down, so I I understand. Um, some of 3817 02:37:53,120 --> 02:37:58,800 the comments that you're relaying, um, 3818 02:37:56,399 --> 02:38:00,720 actually speak to the professional 3819 02:37:58,800 --> 02:38:03,359 capabilities of both staff and the 3820 02:38:00,720 --> 02:38:05,760 consultants. If council would like us to 3821 02:38:03,359 --> 02:38:08,319 look into those accusations that are 3822 02:38:05,760 --> 02:38:10,960 being made, uh, we could absolutely do 3823 02:38:08,319 --> 02:38:13,280 that. Uh I'm not interested in getting 3824 02:38:10,960 --> 02:38:15,920 into a debate at this point and I'm not 3825 02:38:13,280 --> 02:38:18,479 sure if that was the intent. However, 3826 02:38:15,920 --> 02:38:20,160 components like um that staff reports 3827 02:38:18,479 --> 02:38:21,840 didn't accurately portray developer 3828 02:38:20,160 --> 02:38:23,760 feedback. It would be nice to know where 3829 02:38:21,840 --> 02:38:26,399 specifically where that concern is 3830 02:38:23,760 --> 02:38:28,160 raised from relative to the many 3831 02:38:26,399 --> 02:38:30,080 examples and opportunities where we did 3832 02:38:28,160 --> 02:38:31,840 engage specifically the development 3833 02:38:30,080 --> 02:38:34,000 community in a very intentional and 3834 02:38:31,840 --> 02:38:36,720 comprehensive way with a plan that was 3835 02:38:34,000 --> 02:38:40,160 endorsed by council. um the desire for a 3836 02:38:36,720 --> 02:38:43,520 ro more robust engagement um that is 3837 02:38:40,160 --> 02:38:45,680 always an option. The uh engagement can 3838 02:38:43,520 --> 02:38:47,520 be enhanced with the understanding that 3839 02:38:45,680 --> 02:38:49,520 that is a service level increase and 3840 02:38:47,520 --> 02:38:52,479 would require the resources in order to 3841 02:38:49,520 --> 02:38:54,399 provide that service level increase. So 3842 02:38:52,479 --> 02:38:56,080 in the future, if council wants us to go 3843 02:38:54,399 --> 02:38:57,520 back on this one, we can definitely do 3844 02:38:56,080 --> 02:38:59,760 that, but it will require rep 3845 02:38:57,520 --> 02:39:01,439 prioritization of 2026 work plan items 3846 02:38:59,760 --> 02:39:04,000 as well as the resources necessary to 3847 02:39:01,439 --> 02:39:05,920 undertake that work as a priority item. 3848 02:39:04,000 --> 02:39:07,680 In regard to consultants not having 3849 02:39:05,920 --> 02:39:10,240 sufficient local knowledge on market 3850 02:39:07,680 --> 02:39:11,840 conditions, again, that is a significant 3851 02:39:10,240 --> 02:39:13,600 uh comment and commentary on 3852 02:39:11,840 --> 02:39:15,439 professional firms that we rely on in 3853 02:39:13,600 --> 02:39:17,200 order to inform these policy decisions. 3854 02:39:15,439 --> 02:39:19,280 So council can make the informed 3855 02:39:17,200 --> 02:39:22,399 decision. If council would like us to 3856 02:39:19,280 --> 02:39:23,680 look into a separate validation process, 3857 02:39:22,399 --> 02:39:25,439 um that is something that we would 3858 02:39:23,680 --> 02:39:26,479 require direction on and that is 3859 02:39:25,439 --> 02:39:28,080 absolutely something that we could 3860 02:39:26,479 --> 02:39:30,720 undertake if council shares those 3861 02:39:28,080 --> 02:39:33,439 concerns. As far as the technical 3862 02:39:30,720 --> 02:39:36,080 questions in regards to um whether or 3863 02:39:33,439 --> 02:39:37,280 not we can trim the project list, um I 3864 02:39:36,080 --> 02:39:38,800 have projects in town that would not 3865 02:39:37,280 --> 02:39:40,960 have been built if rates had been cut. 3866 02:39:38,800 --> 02:39:43,040 Um that is a very hard thing to cast 3867 02:39:40,960 --> 02:39:44,880 back on and to validate those kinds of 3868 02:39:43,040 --> 02:39:46,399 comments. Uh, so I'm not sure if we're 3869 02:39:44,880 --> 02:39:49,280 going to be able to answer that for 3870 02:39:46,399 --> 02:39:50,880 council in regards to the shoo and the 3871 02:39:49,280 --> 02:39:52,880 legislation not providing the housing 3872 02:39:50,880 --> 02:39:54,000 projected. That's very challenging 3873 02:39:52,880 --> 02:39:56,080 because really that is what the 3874 02:39:54,000 --> 02:39:58,080 provincial government and their policy 3875 02:39:56,080 --> 02:40:00,000 analysts have deemed as one of the main 3876 02:39:58,080 --> 02:40:01,520 ways or primary ways of increasing 3877 02:40:00,000 --> 02:40:03,120 housing availability and dealing with 3878 02:40:01,520 --> 02:40:05,760 the housing crisis we're experiencing on 3879 02:40:03,120 --> 02:40:07,040 a province level. So I wonder where that 3880 02:40:05,760 --> 02:40:08,319 information is coming from and whether 3881 02:40:07,040 --> 02:40:09,920 or not the information has been shared 3882 02:40:08,319 --> 02:40:11,920 with the province. If that is really the 3883 02:40:09,920 --> 02:40:13,600 reality, it means the provincial policy 3884 02:40:11,920 --> 02:40:15,200 approach to this is not effective on 3885 02:40:13,600 --> 02:40:17,600 whole, or at least that's what the 3886 02:40:15,200 --> 02:40:20,160 assertion is in a comment like that. Um, 3887 02:40:17,600 --> 02:40:21,680 with that, I will pass it over to Nancy 3888 02:40:20,160 --> 02:40:24,080 Henderson to talk about some of the 3889 02:40:21,680 --> 02:40:25,520 technical aspects, but if council would 3890 02:40:24,080 --> 02:40:27,920 like to provide direction on those other 3891 02:40:25,520 --> 02:40:29,680 items to conduct investigations into the 3892 02:40:27,920 --> 02:40:31,520 professional conduct and information of 3893 02:40:29,680 --> 02:40:35,479 our staff and third party consultants, 3894 02:40:31,520 --> 02:40:35,479 please go ahead and do so. 3895 02:40:37,280 --> 02:40:41,359 uh through the chair. I guess it's in 3896 02:40:38,960 --> 02:40:45,200 terms of the growth projections. Uh we 3897 02:40:41,359 --> 02:40:48,240 use the 2024 BC stats data to form uh 3898 02:40:45,200 --> 02:40:50,160 the basis of our projections. Uh we did 3899 02:40:48,240 --> 02:40:53,840 review this project's been going on 3900 02:40:50,160 --> 02:40:56,479 since then. Um we did review the 25 uh 3901 02:40:53,840 --> 02:40:58,880 BC stats projections for the city which 3902 02:40:56,479 --> 02:41:02,080 have actually decreased slightly because 3903 02:40:58,880 --> 02:41:05,200 of the immigration policy as as noted. 3904 02:41:02,080 --> 02:41:07,600 Um however the impact of changing the 3905 02:41:05,200 --> 02:41:09,520 projections to the 2025 projections 3906 02:41:07,600 --> 02:41:12,720 would have actually increased the amount 3907 02:41:09,520 --> 02:41:15,840 of the ACC. So we elected to stick with 3908 02:41:12,720 --> 02:41:18,640 the 2024 uh projections for that 3909 02:41:15,840 --> 02:41:20,240 purpose. Um they are fairly conservative 3910 02:41:18,640 --> 02:41:21,760 projections. We certainly weren't using 3911 02:41:20,240 --> 02:41:22,640 like the housing need reports or 3912 02:41:21,760 --> 02:41:25,200 something that's a little more 3913 02:41:22,640 --> 02:41:28,160 aspirational at a higher housing rate. 3914 02:41:25,200 --> 02:41:30,160 Um when we went through uh for each land 3915 02:41:28,160 --> 02:41:32,000 use category, we need to allocate the 3916 02:41:30,160 --> 02:41:35,439 different type of development we project 3917 02:41:32,000 --> 02:41:38,000 to see over 20 the next 20 years. Um the 3918 02:41:35,439 --> 02:41:41,040 amount that was allocated to the low 3919 02:41:38,000 --> 02:41:43,840 density amount where you know that's 3920 02:41:41,040 --> 02:41:46,319 most of the shoo housing falls into that 3921 02:41:43,840 --> 02:41:50,880 um is actually a very low number. Uh so 3922 02:41:46,319 --> 02:41:53,200 it wasn't using uh the province's shoo 3923 02:41:50,880 --> 02:41:55,280 projections that we've used in other 3924 02:41:53,200 --> 02:41:57,520 studies and aspects. So I know sometimes 3925 02:41:55,280 --> 02:41:59,280 there might be a bit of confusion there 3926 02:41:57,520 --> 02:42:01,920 because we have uh used those 3927 02:41:59,280 --> 02:42:04,399 projections in in other work but it was 3928 02:42:01,920 --> 02:42:07,200 a I think about a 10% allocation to the 3929 02:42:04,399 --> 02:42:09,600 low density charge. Um once you get into 3930 02:42:07,200 --> 02:42:12,319 like duplexes and plexes they do fit 3931 02:42:09,600 --> 02:42:14,880 that townhouse charge but as do uh 3932 02:42:12,319 --> 02:42:16,240 larger townhouse developments. Uh so I 3933 02:42:14,880 --> 02:42:18,080 hope that helps with the understanding 3934 02:42:16,240 --> 02:42:20,399 of the decision- making because we're 3935 02:42:18,080 --> 02:42:22,160 balancing the count the developer 3936 02:42:20,399 --> 02:42:23,760 feedback of not wanting to increase 3937 02:42:22,160 --> 02:42:27,040 rates with the decision- making 3938 02:42:23,760 --> 02:42:29,680 regarding the projections and as we know 3939 02:42:27,040 --> 02:42:31,600 markets do change and with those market 3940 02:42:29,680 --> 02:42:34,399 changes like so does population 3941 02:42:31,600 --> 02:42:36,880 projections change and it is a 20-year 3942 02:42:34,399 --> 02:42:38,640 study. So if you're to look backwards uh 3943 02:42:36,880 --> 02:42:41,680 20 years we're you know we're kind of in 3944 02:42:38,640 --> 02:42:45,040 line. We're a very um high growth high 3945 02:42:41,680 --> 02:42:46,880 demand area as well. Uh so we wanted to 3946 02:42:45,040 --> 02:42:49,359 not increase the rates anymore because 3947 02:42:46,880 --> 02:42:52,479 the the land use economist that did do 3948 02:42:49,359 --> 02:42:54,800 the analysis was very clear uh to keep 3949 02:42:52,479 --> 02:42:56,880 the rates no higher than where they were 3950 02:42:54,800 --> 02:42:59,439 when we did the engagement back in the 3951 02:42:56,880 --> 02:43:02,560 summer. Um, so we've really focused on 3952 02:42:59,439 --> 02:43:06,040 that uh and keeping them sort of at that 3953 02:43:02,560 --> 02:43:06,040 consistent rate. 3954 02:43:08,800 --> 02:43:12,600 » And uh, yeah, 3955 02:43:13,120 --> 02:43:18,319 » Thanks, Mayor. I I just want to clarify, 3956 02:43:15,280 --> 02:43:21,600 thanks to staff for those responses. It 3957 02:43:18,319 --> 02:43:24,560 certainly wasn't my intent to uh attack 3958 02:43:21,600 --> 02:43:27,359 or challenge the qualifications uh of 3959 02:43:24,560 --> 02:43:29,120 staff or or consultants, but merely to 3960 02:43:27,359 --> 02:43:33,920 to share opinions that had been 3961 02:43:29,120 --> 02:43:36,800 expressed um in in um the consultations 3962 02:43:33,920 --> 02:43:39,920 that took place uh where primarily the 3963 02:43:36,800 --> 02:43:42,319 feeling was that uh uh these changes are 3964 02:43:39,920 --> 02:43:45,920 going to have a significant impact on 3965 02:43:42,319 --> 02:43:48,080 the uh um the housing targets that we 3966 02:43:45,920 --> 02:43:52,600 have and and the ability of our local 3967 02:43:48,080 --> 02:43:52,600 builders to achieve them. Thanks. 3968 02:43:52,960 --> 02:43:56,080 » Thanks for that clarification, Councelor 3969 02:43:54,960 --> 02:43:57,600 Hill and Mr. Gar. 3970 02:43:56,080 --> 02:44:00,080 » Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Through to council 3971 02:43:57,600 --> 02:44:02,399 as a whole. Um, you know, we and our 3972 02:44:00,080 --> 02:44:04,399 professional work that we do are acting 3973 02:44:02,399 --> 02:44:06,800 on council's direction and as you heard 3974 02:44:04,399 --> 02:44:09,439 earlier today about the desires to 3975 02:44:06,800 --> 02:44:11,840 manage the costs to the community. We 3976 02:44:09,439 --> 02:44:14,080 have a limited number of opportunities 3977 02:44:11,840 --> 02:44:15,680 and the province has significantly 3978 02:44:14,080 --> 02:44:17,520 altered what's accessible to 3979 02:44:15,680 --> 02:44:19,040 municipalities. And in the past, a 3980 02:44:17,520 --> 02:44:22,080 number of these amenities would actually 3981 02:44:19,040 --> 02:44:25,920 been levered out of uh development 3982 02:44:22,080 --> 02:44:29,520 applications. And so we only have a we 3983 02:44:25,920 --> 02:44:31,439 actually have a limited tools now that 3984 02:44:29,520 --> 02:44:33,359 we can work through on this. And these 3985 02:44:31,439 --> 02:44:34,640 what's come forward is what council has 3986 02:44:33,359 --> 02:44:38,000 identified as these sort of priorities 3987 02:44:34,640 --> 02:44:39,760 for us. Um 3988 02:44:38,000 --> 02:44:41,520 we can appreciate there's entrepreneurs 3989 02:44:39,760 --> 02:44:44,080 that are investing in this community and 3990 02:44:41,520 --> 02:44:45,680 have for many years. uh and we wouldn't 3991 02:44:44,080 --> 02:44:46,880 be in a position to have any kind of 3992 02:44:45,680 --> 02:44:48,720 housing unless people built those 3993 02:44:46,880 --> 02:44:50,560 houses. So it's it's a really ch it's a 3994 02:44:48,720 --> 02:44:54,000 very very difficult challenge in front 3995 02:44:50,560 --> 02:44:56,399 of us. Um 3996 02:44:54,000 --> 02:44:58,240 I would say that uh particularly with 3997 02:44:56,399 --> 02:45:00,080 the ACC's our our director of 3998 02:44:58,240 --> 02:45:01,600 development services uh our previous 3999 02:45:00,080 --> 02:45:03,520 director of development services 4000 02:45:01,600 --> 02:45:06,880 insisted that we have an economic 4001 02:45:03,520 --> 02:45:08,720 analysis as it relates to these ACCs. 4002 02:45:06,880 --> 02:45:10,240 uh other communities in the valley that 4003 02:45:08,720 --> 02:45:12,479 have brought forward ECC's have not 4004 02:45:10,240 --> 02:45:14,160 undertaken that work and so we we 4005 02:45:12,479 --> 02:45:17,359 actually took that extra step and so 4006 02:45:14,160 --> 02:45:19,520 again if this if the outcome of the work 4007 02:45:17,359 --> 02:45:21,760 um from third party consultants is is 4008 02:45:19,520 --> 02:45:23,520 actually insufficient um it's a step 4009 02:45:21,760 --> 02:45:25,840 that we actually took recognizing how 4010 02:45:23,520 --> 02:45:28,880 impactful these could be and council may 4011 02:45:25,840 --> 02:45:31,120 recall that um the uh levies that we 4012 02:45:28,880 --> 02:45:32,880 were trying to do around other amenities 4013 02:45:31,120 --> 02:45:35,520 you know have been have been also very 4014 02:45:32,880 --> 02:45:37,760 challenging in the community 4015 02:45:35,520 --> 02:45:40,720 so So I I [clears throat] offer that we 4016 02:45:37,760 --> 02:45:42,479 find ourselves in a situation um where 4017 02:45:40,720 --> 02:45:45,040 is growth going to proceed? Is this 4018 02:45:42,479 --> 02:45:48,160 going to impact growth? We also am now 4019 02:45:45,040 --> 02:45:51,439 absorbing the concept and the shared 4020 02:45:48,160 --> 02:45:54,080 understanding that CFP Comox and its 4021 02:45:51,439 --> 02:45:55,760 expansion is actually going to now have 4022 02:45:54,080 --> 02:45:57,760 actually known pressure inside the 4023 02:45:55,760 --> 02:45:59,600 community. So we most of our development 4024 02:45:57,760 --> 02:46:02,640 growth is was kind of unknown and we 4025 02:45:59,600 --> 02:46:03,840 react but um and lots of discussions 4026 02:46:02,640 --> 02:46:05,600 have been happening and we know at a 4027 02:46:03,840 --> 02:46:06,960 minimum you know these kinds of this 4028 02:46:05,600 --> 02:46:10,880 kind of job growth is going to be there 4029 02:46:06,960 --> 02:46:13,279 which will require the housing and so um 4030 02:46:10,880 --> 02:46:15,120 you know I offer that having projections 4031 02:46:13,279 --> 02:46:17,040 are extremely challenging at the best of 4032 02:46:15,120 --> 02:46:19,760 times and now we have this combination 4033 02:46:17,040 --> 02:46:21,120 of potential economic changes but at the 4034 02:46:19,760 --> 02:46:23,439 same time we know there's going to be 4035 02:46:21,120 --> 02:46:24,960 direct investment in a jurisdiction 4036 02:46:23,439 --> 02:46:26,640 that's going to directly impact the city 4037 02:46:24,960 --> 02:46:28,720 of Courtney and needed housing. And so 4038 02:46:26,640 --> 02:46:30,399 we're working as best we can with the 4039 02:46:28,720 --> 02:46:34,399 development community balancing the 4040 02:46:30,399 --> 02:46:36,720 costs and needs uh to address this new 4041 02:46:34,399 --> 02:46:38,640 growth in the community. And uh at this 4042 02:46:36,720 --> 02:46:40,880 point, you know, your staff have 4043 02:46:38,640 --> 02:46:43,200 provided to you and and I've endorsed a 4044 02:46:40,880 --> 02:46:44,560 report to take forward. Council can 4045 02:46:43,200 --> 02:46:47,359 provide us with political direction in 4046 02:46:44,560 --> 02:46:49,439 this regard and we'll respond. And I 4047 02:46:47,359 --> 02:46:51,120 would say the timing of this work 4048 02:46:49,439 --> 02:46:54,399 relative to what's about to happen in 4049 02:46:51,120 --> 02:46:56,000 November. And I will say that if we get 4050 02:46:54,399 --> 02:46:57,760 alternative direction to do significant 4051 02:46:56,000 --> 02:47:00,640 amount of work, we are butdding up right 4052 02:46:57,760 --> 02:47:04,319 up against the next coming changes. And 4053 02:47:00,640 --> 02:47:07,760 so with the uh issues at hand, it would 4054 02:47:04,319 --> 02:47:10,800 be um important work that we would have 4055 02:47:07,760 --> 02:47:12,319 to prioritize uh in the next very short 4056 02:47:10,800 --> 02:47:15,359 period of time and it would be likely 4057 02:47:12,319 --> 02:47:17,279 very difficult uh to adjust that. Having 4058 02:47:15,359 --> 02:47:18,560 said that though, 4059 02:47:17,279 --> 02:47:20,160 clear direction has been given to 4060 02:47:18,560 --> 02:47:22,479 council to stay on top of these things 4061 02:47:20,160 --> 02:47:26,560 to make that make sure they're accurate, 4062 02:47:22,479 --> 02:47:29,439 timely, um and um at the cutting edge of 4063 02:47:26,560 --> 02:47:31,279 what development is needed. Um we have 4064 02:47:29,439 --> 02:47:33,600 uh a number of needs inside the 4065 02:47:31,279 --> 02:47:36,800 community that primarily this amenity 4066 02:47:33,600 --> 02:47:39,920 cost charges um related to the outdoor 4067 02:47:36,800 --> 02:47:42,160 pool if uh what has been presented to 4068 02:47:39,920 --> 02:47:44,240 council has been adjusted because of the 4069 02:47:42,160 --> 02:47:46,560 cost of the pool. And so we will have to 4070 02:47:44,240 --> 02:47:48,720 re-engage uh and understand those things 4071 02:47:46,560 --> 02:47:51,279 because there are important community 4072 02:47:48,720 --> 02:47:53,200 growth impacted amenities um that are 4073 02:47:51,279 --> 02:47:54,800 not included in this recognizing the 4074 02:47:53,200 --> 02:47:56,720 fact that there is this you know big 4075 02:47:54,800 --> 02:47:59,200 priority project. So this is a 4076 02:47:56,720 --> 02:48:00,960 long-winded way of saying that what's in 4077 02:47:59,200 --> 02:48:03,279 front of council reflects what council 4078 02:48:00,960 --> 02:48:05,120 has asked us to do. It's consistent with 4079 02:48:03,279 --> 02:48:06,640 our capital projects. It's consistent 4080 02:48:05,120 --> 02:48:08,080 with our strategic priorities. It's 4081 02:48:06,640 --> 02:48:10,000 consistent with what the community plan 4082 02:48:08,080 --> 02:48:11,840 has asked us for. and it responds to 4083 02:48:10,000 --> 02:48:14,640 what the provincial direction has been 4084 02:48:11,840 --> 02:48:19,000 and our staff serve at your direction 4085 02:48:14,640 --> 02:48:19,000 and uh we will ultimately take that. 4086 02:48:19,439 --> 02:48:22,960 Thanks Mr. Garvid and I think one of the 4087 02:48:21,200 --> 02:48:24,880 other comments was if it's not on the 4088 02:48:22,960 --> 02:48:27,120 list we also can't apply for grants for 4089 02:48:24,880 --> 02:48:28,640 it either. So um that's one of the one 4090 02:48:27,120 --> 02:48:30,479 of the challenges if it goes off the 4091 02:48:28,640 --> 02:48:33,760 list then I believe that that was 4092 02:48:30,479 --> 02:48:38,640 another um thing Mr. Garbett 4093 02:48:33,760 --> 02:48:40,399 sorry Mr. Uh we uh typically any grants 4094 02:48:38,640 --> 02:48:42,240 require you know matching budget funds 4095 02:48:40,399 --> 02:48:45,359 but no it does would not have to be in 4096 02:48:42,240 --> 02:48:47,680 an ACC list for us to apply for a grant 4097 02:48:45,359 --> 02:48:50,000 and staff could correct me if I've 4098 02:48:47,680 --> 02:48:51,040 answered incorrectly. 4099 02:48:50,000 --> 02:48:52,720 » All right. 4100 02:48:51,040 --> 02:48:54,640 » I think Mr. Mayor what you're referring 4101 02:48:52,720 --> 02:48:58,080 to is the promise from the federal 4102 02:48:54,640 --> 02:49:01,200 government to provide um relief around 4103 02:48:58,080 --> 02:49:02,960 DCC and ACC costs to developers. Yeah. 4104 02:49:01,200 --> 02:49:04,800 the policy approach or the policy 4105 02:49:02,960 --> 02:49:07,439 options as to how that money will flow, 4106 02:49:04,800 --> 02:49:09,120 who it'll flow to, what it will cover, 4107 02:49:07,439 --> 02:49:10,880 and whether or not a cost sharing 4108 02:49:09,120 --> 02:49:12,240 approach will be included has not been 4109 02:49:10,880 --> 02:49:15,120 announced. We don't have any early 4110 02:49:12,240 --> 02:49:16,880 indications at this time. However, if 4111 02:49:15,120 --> 02:49:19,200 the plan, if the federal government, as 4112 02:49:16,880 --> 02:49:21,520 they've stated, is to offset the cost of 4113 02:49:19,200 --> 02:49:23,120 DCC's. Not having a project on the list 4114 02:49:21,520 --> 02:49:25,200 would likely make that project 4115 02:49:23,120 --> 02:49:26,000 ineligible to access that federal 4116 02:49:25,200 --> 02:49:27,680 funding. 4117 02:49:26,000 --> 02:49:29,680 » Yeah. And and that's kind of how I'm 4118 02:49:27,680 --> 02:49:32,399 interpreting it as well. So, you know, 4119 02:49:29,680 --> 02:49:35,120 again, it's a bit of an unknown, but uh 4120 02:49:32,399 --> 02:49:38,560 definitely uh big moves coming uh later 4121 02:49:35,120 --> 02:49:40,800 this year. So, uh Oh, yeah. No, Mr. 4122 02:49:38,560 --> 02:49:43,200 Garin, also want to clarify, the topic 4123 02:49:40,800 --> 02:49:45,279 of discussion is amenity cost charges, 4124 02:49:43,200 --> 02:49:46,560 not development cost charges, and the 4125 02:49:45,279 --> 02:49:49,600 federal government didn't talk about 4126 02:49:46,560 --> 02:49:52,880 funding ACC's. So, just to keep keep us 4127 02:49:49,600 --> 02:49:55,359 on uh on the uh matter on the agenda. 4128 02:49:52,880 --> 02:49:56,560 » Thanks. Thanks for that clarification, 4129 02:49:55,359 --> 02:49:59,200 Council Moore. 4130 02:49:56,560 --> 02:50:01,920 » Great. Thanks, Mayor. Um my question is 4131 02:49:59,200 --> 02:50:04,640 around the grace period not the instream 4132 02:50:01,920 --> 02:50:10,000 protection. Um so I heard you say that 4133 02:50:04,640 --> 02:50:13,520 when when and if it comes back um the 4134 02:50:10,000 --> 02:50:18,000 bylaw would be enacted but we could 4135 02:50:13,520 --> 02:50:20,800 delay the when it's enacted. Is that is 4136 02:50:18,000 --> 02:50:23,120 that correct? 4137 02:50:20,800 --> 02:50:26,319 » Through the chair. Uh it is possible for 4138 02:50:23,120 --> 02:50:29,760 a council to adopt a bylaw and set a 4139 02:50:26,319 --> 02:50:31,359 date for when it becomes uh the charges 4140 02:50:29,760 --> 02:50:33,040 become in effect. 4141 02:50:31,359 --> 02:50:34,160 » Uh that could be beyond the date of 4142 02:50:33,040 --> 02:50:36,240 adoption. Okay. 4143 02:50:34,160 --> 02:50:37,840 » And that's an option for council. Uh 4144 02:50:36,240 --> 02:50:39,760 just keeping in mind the instream 4145 02:50:37,840 --> 02:50:43,200 protection is from the date of adoption, 4146 02:50:39,760 --> 02:50:45,760 not the date of the great grace period. 4147 02:50:43,200 --> 02:50:47,840 » The date Oh, from the date of adoption. 4148 02:50:45,760 --> 02:50:50,479 » Okay. 4149 02:50:47,840 --> 02:50:53,200 All right. I just was trying to think of 4150 02:50:50,479 --> 02:50:54,479 a way that we could maybe extend the the 4151 02:50:53,200 --> 02:50:56,720 grace period, but doesn't look like 4152 02:50:54,479 --> 02:51:00,399 that'll fit. Thanks. 4153 02:50:56,720 --> 02:51:03,600 » Thanks, Council Warren and Councelor Fr. 4154 02:51:00,399 --> 02:51:05,840 » Yeah, thanks, Mayor. Um, yeah, I'll just 4155 02:51:03,600 --> 02:51:08,240 highlight that. Um, 4156 02:51:05,840 --> 02:51:09,920 I mean, this issue 4157 02:51:08,240 --> 02:51:11,680 has input from so many different 4158 02:51:09,920 --> 02:51:14,160 perspectives. You know, us at the table, 4159 02:51:11,680 --> 02:51:15,439 we see it differently than um the 4160 02:51:14,160 --> 02:51:16,960 construction industry. We see it 4161 02:51:15,439 --> 02:51:19,200 differently than staff. we see it 4162 02:51:16,960 --> 02:51:21,760 differently than people who already own 4163 02:51:19,200 --> 02:51:24,479 a house versus people who want to buy a 4164 02:51:21,760 --> 02:51:27,200 house. So, uh, our job obviously is to 4165 02:51:24,479 --> 02:51:29,200 balance that all out. And, um, yeah, 4166 02:51:27,200 --> 02:51:30,800 there's I don't think anyone's pointing 4167 02:51:29,200 --> 02:51:32,160 fingers. It's just everyone has a 4168 02:51:30,800 --> 02:51:35,680 different perspective and we all have to 4169 02:51:32,160 --> 02:51:38,560 figure out what the solution is. Um 4170 02:51:35,680 --> 02:51:44,000 I'm wondering if we have an ACC project 4171 02:51:38,560 --> 02:51:47,200 and um we don't collect enough money for 4172 02:51:44,000 --> 02:51:49,040 it and then you know down the road we go 4173 02:51:47,200 --> 02:51:53,200 well maybe we're just not going to do 4174 02:51:49,040 --> 02:51:54,960 that. What what happens to that money 4175 02:51:53,200 --> 02:51:57,840 through the chair? I mean the money the 4176 02:51:54,960 --> 02:52:01,200 money would just stay in the ACC reserve 4177 02:51:57,840 --> 02:52:03,840 and be directed to other projects. Uh it 4178 02:52:01,200 --> 02:52:06,640 is possible to advance a project before 4179 02:52:03,840 --> 02:52:09,120 you have money to pay for it all, but 4180 02:52:06,640 --> 02:52:12,000 then that project would stay on the ACC 4181 02:52:09,120 --> 02:52:14,640 list until the funds were received. So a 4182 02:52:12,000 --> 02:52:17,040 project could be on the list for 20 or 4183 02:52:14,640 --> 02:52:19,200 or longer years uh if growth was slower 4184 02:52:17,040 --> 02:52:21,120 than anticipated and then once it that 4185 02:52:19,200 --> 02:52:23,120 project's been paid for then it would 4186 02:52:21,120 --> 02:52:25,120 come off the list, right? Um, I think 4187 02:52:23,120 --> 02:52:27,520 it's also important to note that like 4188 02:52:25,120 --> 02:52:29,680 should the city receive funding, grant 4189 02:52:27,520 --> 02:52:31,760 funding for example, you should be doing 4190 02:52:29,680 --> 02:52:34,399 an amendment to the bylaw to reflect 4191 02:52:31,760 --> 02:52:36,640 that funding uh because that could also 4192 02:52:34,399 --> 02:52:39,279 decrease the cost would decrease the 4193 02:52:36,640 --> 02:52:41,600 cost of the ACC and it's something that 4194 02:52:39,279 --> 02:52:43,760 is a best practice and it's not always 4195 02:52:41,600 --> 02:52:45,439 followed. So, you know, considering the 4196 02:52:43,760 --> 02:52:47,200 market conditions that are in right now, 4197 02:52:45,439 --> 02:52:49,040 if there's a commitment to apply for 4198 02:52:47,200 --> 02:52:50,880 funding and you get that funding, you 4199 02:52:49,040 --> 02:52:53,200 know, committing to make sure that that 4200 02:52:50,880 --> 02:52:54,880 administrative work is done, I'm sure it 4201 02:52:53,200 --> 02:52:56,560 would be also important to the 4202 02:52:54,880 --> 02:52:58,560 development community. 4203 02:52:56,560 --> 02:53:00,479 » And then that applies to DCC's all 4204 02:52:58,560 --> 02:53:02,000 everything you just said. 4205 02:53:00,479 --> 02:53:05,279 » Yeah, the chair. Yes, it does. 4206 02:53:02,000 --> 02:53:07,680 » Okay, great. Um, I guess I'm interested 4207 02:53:05,279 --> 02:53:11,359 in maybe looking at the assist factor 4208 02:53:07,680 --> 02:53:12,880 and what what that could mean. Um I 4209 02:53:11,359 --> 02:53:15,520 don't know the numbers off the top of my 4210 02:53:12,880 --> 02:53:18,399 head but um you know could we say well 4211 02:53:15,520 --> 02:53:20,479 for the next two years uh considering 4212 02:53:18,399 --> 02:53:23,520 the you know economic climate we'd like 4213 02:53:20,479 --> 02:53:25,439 to provide a 20% assist factor which 4214 02:53:23,520 --> 02:53:28,560 would essentially lower what we bringing 4215 02:53:25,439 --> 02:53:30,399 in in for ACC's is is that something we 4216 02:53:28,560 --> 02:53:32,960 need to would that be a lot of work to 4217 02:53:30,399 --> 02:53:34,560 figure out what those numbers are 4218 02:53:32,960 --> 02:53:37,200 » Uh through the chair the assist factor 4219 02:53:34,560 --> 02:53:40,399 is council's tool you know to reduce the 4220 02:53:37,200 --> 02:53:42,560 impact of ACC's you know The effect is 4221 02:53:40,399 --> 02:53:45,040 the assist factor amount that it would 4222 02:53:42,560 --> 02:53:47,760 lower the ACC ends up being a burden on 4223 02:53:45,040 --> 02:53:50,240 the existing tax base. So as long as you 4224 02:53:47,760 --> 02:53:53,439 recognize that that is a a tool council 4225 02:53:50,240 --> 02:53:55,680 has and you could phase it in um you 4226 02:53:53,439 --> 02:53:58,720 could say in year one it's a 20%, year 4227 02:53:55,680 --> 02:54:01,120 two it's 15% you know and so on. Um and 4228 02:53:58,720 --> 02:54:03,279 then the cost of that uh you know staff 4229 02:54:01,120 --> 02:54:05,279 could potentially report back on the 4230 02:54:03,279 --> 02:54:08,080 impacts. So we don't have to do mental 4231 02:54:05,279 --> 02:54:10,479 math tonight but just in terms of uh you 4232 02:54:08,080 --> 02:54:13,439 know looking at the impact to that would 4233 02:54:10,479 --> 02:54:15,760 be put on the municipal responsibility. 4234 02:54:13,439 --> 02:54:17,120 Uh that is an option to council. 4235 02:54:15,760 --> 02:54:19,200 » Yeah. And if and if we did something 4236 02:54:17,120 --> 02:54:22,000 like that and it turns out that this was 4237 02:54:19,200 --> 02:54:24,720 a great boon for development and would 4238 02:54:22,000 --> 02:54:27,760 we could we in essence collect more in 4239 02:54:24,720 --> 02:54:31,040 ACC's than we plan to um or does the 4240 02:54:27,760 --> 02:54:34,399 number just I mean do we reach our 80% 4241 02:54:31,040 --> 02:54:36,080 of their allotted responsibility 4242 02:54:34,399 --> 02:54:37,680 knowing that we're covering 20 and then 4243 02:54:36,080 --> 02:54:40,000 we just stop we just take it off the 4244 02:54:37,680 --> 02:54:41,359 list and say we've collected money or I 4245 02:54:40,000 --> 02:54:43,040 assume it wouldn't be down to the 4246 02:54:41,359 --> 02:54:44,399 project like that anyways would it? 4247 02:54:43,040 --> 02:54:46,560 Yeah, through the chair. I mean, this is 4248 02:54:44,399 --> 02:54:48,399 why it's important to update these 4249 02:54:46,560 --> 02:54:50,160 charges regularly and look at what 4250 02:54:48,399 --> 02:54:52,319 you're collecting and do development 4251 02:54:50,160 --> 02:54:55,120 projections and as you do cost estimates 4252 02:54:52,319 --> 02:54:56,880 on these projects to also update the 4253 02:54:55,120 --> 02:54:59,520 costs because these are basically 4254 02:54:56,880 --> 02:55:01,600 highlevel cost estimates. Once they get 4255 02:54:59,520 --> 02:55:03,920 accurate, the project costs might go up, 4256 02:55:01,600 --> 02:55:05,840 it might go down, but that does impact 4257 02:55:03,920 --> 02:55:07,680 uh the charge overall. So these should 4258 02:55:05,840 --> 02:55:10,240 be like living you should be paying 4259 02:55:07,680 --> 02:55:12,240 attention uh to the cost to the 4260 02:55:10,240 --> 02:55:17,120 development projections and making 4261 02:55:12,240 --> 02:55:18,880 adjustments um often the DCC uh because 4262 02:55:17,120 --> 02:55:21,920 you're going to the inspector 4263 02:55:18,880 --> 02:55:24,160 municipalities and it's quite a process 4264 02:55:21,920 --> 02:55:26,000 uh they tend to be you know a little bit 4265 02:55:24,160 --> 02:55:28,000 longer. years got a little bit too long 4266 02:55:26,000 --> 02:55:29,920 in all honesty, but like in that sort of 4267 02:55:28,000 --> 02:55:32,080 3 to four year timeline for a major 4268 02:55:29,920 --> 02:55:33,840 review, if you get a huge grant, you 4269 02:55:32,080 --> 02:55:35,680 should you should do that minor 4270 02:55:33,840 --> 02:55:37,279 amendment and the ministry deals with 4271 02:55:35,680 --> 02:55:39,760 that differently. But when you're 4272 02:55:37,279 --> 02:55:41,840 talking about an ACC bylaw, it's just 4273 02:55:39,760 --> 02:55:44,720 like all the other CDs bylaws, and you 4274 02:55:41,840 --> 02:55:46,640 don't need that um approval from the 4275 02:55:44,720 --> 02:55:48,960 inspector, but you do need to do some 4276 02:55:46,640 --> 02:55:50,800 consultation. But I expect if you're 4277 02:55:48,960 --> 02:55:53,840 bringing forward a grant to reduce the 4278 02:55:50,800 --> 02:55:55,279 cost of the ACC, you know, the level of 4279 02:55:53,840 --> 02:55:57,279 engagement for something like that 4280 02:55:55,279 --> 02:56:00,000 should be quite minor. 4281 02:55:57,279 --> 02:56:03,680 » Yeah. I guess my thinking then back back 4282 02:56:00,000 --> 02:56:06,240 to the assist factor is that um our 4283 02:56:03,680 --> 02:56:10,720 development community is telling us that 4284 02:56:06,240 --> 02:56:13,920 uh projects might not be financially 4285 02:56:10,720 --> 02:56:16,080 possible or won't be funded by banks. 4286 02:56:13,920 --> 02:56:18,371 Banks will see the projects as 4287 02:56:16,080 --> 02:56:18,640 unfundable. 4288 02:56:18,371 --> 02:56:21,920 » [clears throat] 4289 02:56:18,640 --> 02:56:24,000 » And um yeah, it's hard it's hard to 4290 02:56:21,920 --> 02:56:25,920 know. I mean, I would assume they know 4291 02:56:24,000 --> 02:56:28,720 or they feel like they know. And um 4292 02:56:25,920 --> 02:56:32,399 yeah, it's hard to to decide how much 4293 02:56:28,720 --> 02:56:34,960 support to give to that industry. Um but 4294 02:56:32,399 --> 02:56:37,120 I'd be interested in in in getting some 4295 02:56:34,960 --> 02:56:40,160 numbers back on assist factors for ACC. 4296 02:56:37,120 --> 02:56:42,640 And I guess my next question would be um 4297 02:56:40,160 --> 02:56:44,080 is that possible to do for DCC's if we 4298 02:56:42,640 --> 02:56:45,680 want to look at if we want to look at 4299 02:56:44,080 --> 02:56:47,279 that. I know we sent did we send that 4300 02:56:45,680 --> 02:56:49,520 off already because we gave it three 4301 02:56:47,279 --> 02:56:52,080 ratings, but is that an option that 4302 02:56:49,520 --> 02:56:53,920 council still has on that because I know 4303 02:56:52,080 --> 02:56:57,160 ACC's are a rather small part of this 4304 02:56:53,920 --> 02:56:57,160 whole thing. 4305 02:56:57,520 --> 02:57:04,560 » Right, Miss uh Okono. Um so just as u 4306 02:57:02,160 --> 02:57:07,200 NY's reference kind of the trade-off so 4307 02:57:04,560 --> 02:57:10,000 it's a bit like if you uh increase the 4308 02:57:07,200 --> 02:57:11,120 assist factor here um because the 4309 02:57:10,000 --> 02:57:12,960 development community would be paying 4310 02:57:11,120 --> 02:57:14,800 less you see an increase that would 4311 02:57:12,960 --> 02:57:16,960 correspond on the taxpayer side as far 4312 02:57:14,800 --> 02:57:19,359 as funding the plan that the city has 4313 02:57:16,960 --> 02:57:20,960 made in the capital program that council 4314 02:57:19,359 --> 02:57:23,520 has identified as important through the 4315 02:57:20,960 --> 02:57:25,200 engagement processes that we undertake. 4316 02:57:23,520 --> 02:57:27,120 My I would recommend to council if you 4317 02:57:25,200 --> 02:57:28,960 want to look at those considerations 4318 02:57:27,120 --> 02:57:31,600 that you do them in context with the 4319 02:57:28,960 --> 02:57:33,520 overall financial planning process and 4320 02:57:31,600 --> 02:57:36,160 really look first at the projects 4321 02:57:33,520 --> 02:57:38,560 themselves and then consider the funding 4322 02:57:36,160 --> 02:57:41,120 mechanism that you would prefer in order 4323 02:57:38,560 --> 02:57:43,680 to make those projects come to fruition. 4324 02:57:41,120 --> 02:57:46,000 It's very hard because the ACC bylaw 4325 02:57:43,680 --> 02:57:48,560 itself, similarly to the DCC bylaw, is a 4326 02:57:46,000 --> 02:57:51,279 mechanism to pay for the infrastructure 4327 02:57:48,560 --> 02:57:53,840 we need and the priorities that we have 4328 02:57:51,279 --> 02:57:56,880 been um provided direction from council 4329 02:57:53,840 --> 02:57:59,920 on. Really the big changes would stem 4330 02:57:56,880 --> 02:58:02,080 from changing priorities or changing the 4331 02:57:59,920 --> 02:58:04,000 plan the time horizon and things like 4332 02:58:02,080 --> 02:58:05,840 that. So really this isn't a 4333 02:58:04,000 --> 02:58:08,560 conversation that happens in isolation 4334 02:58:05,840 --> 02:58:10,800 related to this one mechanism. is part 4335 02:58:08,560 --> 02:58:12,880 of a bigger consideration planning 4336 02:58:10,800 --> 02:58:15,200 process and perspectives when it comes 4337 02:58:12,880 --> 02:58:17,439 to whether or not the projects are 4338 02:58:15,200 --> 02:58:19,920 necessary and who pays for those 4339 02:58:17,439 --> 02:58:23,439 projects based on who benefits the most 4340 02:58:19,920 --> 02:58:25,760 and where the burden can be borne. So, 4341 02:58:23,439 --> 02:58:27,840 um, happy to do the work, but I would 4342 02:58:25,760 --> 02:58:30,000 say out of the context of the longer 4343 02:58:27,840 --> 02:58:32,240 financial plan and the capital plans, 4344 02:58:30,000 --> 02:58:34,399 um, it's very problematic to see how an 4345 02:58:32,240 --> 02:58:36,160 action over here may cause challenges 4346 02:58:34,399 --> 02:58:38,160 for what council has already identified 4347 02:58:36,160 --> 02:58:39,520 around tax rates and sustainability in 4348 02:58:38,160 --> 02:58:40,960 the future, especially based on 4349 02:58:39,520 --> 02:58:43,200 conversations that have happened earlier 4350 02:58:40,960 --> 02:58:44,080 tonight and uh, previously in committees 4351 02:58:43,200 --> 02:58:44,960 as a whole when we were talking about 4352 02:58:44,080 --> 02:58:46,399 the budget. 4353 02:58:44,960 --> 02:58:48,399 » Yeah. Yeah, that's fair. Thanks for 4354 02:58:46,399 --> 02:58:51,439 that. I'll I'll digress and let others 4355 02:58:48,399 --> 02:58:51,920 speak. Thanks, Councelor F and Mr. 4356 02:58:51,439 --> 02:58:54,319 Corbett. 4357 02:58:51,920 --> 02:58:56,399 » Yeah. Thanks. Uh I just would to weigh 4358 02:58:54,319 --> 02:58:58,960 in ultimately we've done significant 4359 02:58:56,399 --> 02:59:00,640 amount of work. If if the issue is a cis 4360 02:58:58,960 --> 02:59:02,240 factor, we've actually asked council for 4361 02:59:00,640 --> 02:59:04,399 direction on that. That's that's not a 4362 02:59:02,240 --> 02:59:06,479 significant change. If it's removing 4363 02:59:04,399 --> 02:59:07,760 projects, there's there's significant 4364 02:59:06,479 --> 02:59:09,920 amount of work to do that. And then 4365 02:59:07,760 --> 02:59:11,840 there also is implications because some 4366 02:59:09,920 --> 02:59:13,920 of those projects may or may not 4367 02:59:11,840 --> 02:59:15,680 actually be directly related to 4368 02:59:13,920 --> 02:59:18,560 development that has frontage there. And 4369 02:59:15,680 --> 02:59:20,960 so sometimes we have development uh uh 4370 02:59:18,560 --> 02:59:22,399 development that has uh dcc credits 4371 02:59:20,960 --> 02:59:23,840 towards that. So I guess it would 4372 02:59:22,399 --> 02:59:25,840 suggest that council has given us 4373 02:59:23,840 --> 02:59:28,399 direction to go down a route. Uh if 4374 02:59:25,840 --> 02:59:31,040 we're talking about assist factor that's 4375 02:59:28,399 --> 02:59:34,240 a type of work talking about what is a 4376 02:59:31,040 --> 02:59:36,720 dcc project that's that's also important 4377 02:59:34,240 --> 02:59:37,840 work but at this time um you know we 4378 02:59:36,720 --> 02:59:39,359 we're looking for some really clear 4379 02:59:37,840 --> 02:59:42,720 direction from council in here to come 4380 02:59:39,359 --> 02:59:44,399 back on items. Uh remind council that we 4381 02:59:42,720 --> 02:59:46,000 worked regionally to try and coordinate 4382 02:59:44,399 --> 02:59:48,800 this as well. I understand actually 4383 02:59:46,000 --> 02:59:52,160 though the CVRD has adopted their sewer 4384 02:59:48,800 --> 02:59:53,840 DCC. Uh the intention was to kind of 4385 02:59:52,160 --> 02:59:55,600 coordinate this so it would all be 4386 02:59:53,840 --> 02:59:59,680 landing at the same time. So developers 4387 02:59:55,600 --> 03:00:02,479 would be um responding to um you know in 4388 02:59:59,680 --> 03:00:04,640 a comprehensive way but uh we we're just 4389 03:00:02,479 --> 03:00:07,760 already starting dcc calculations or 4390 03:00:04,640 --> 03:00:09,840 sorry there are they will be impacting 4391 03:00:07,760 --> 03:00:11,840 at a different time from a year from 4392 03:00:09,840 --> 03:00:13,359 now. We are not doing any different 4393 03:00:11,840 --> 03:00:16,399 calculations right at this point. My 4394 03:00:13,359 --> 03:00:17,760 apologies. Um so if if council can uh 4395 03:00:16,399 --> 03:00:20,960 let us know where you want to go, we the 4396 03:00:17,760 --> 03:00:22,800 staff can respond. Um, yeah, this is, as 4397 03:00:20,960 --> 03:00:24,960 I said in my long-winded discussion 4398 03:00:22,800 --> 03:00:27,600 around ACC's, it's not easy at this 4399 03:00:24,960 --> 03:00:31,359 point. And, uh, council, we're here to 4400 03:00:27,600 --> 03:00:33,359 get council direction on on this matter. 4401 03:00:31,359 --> 03:00:36,160 » Thanks, Mr. Garbett and Council 4402 03:00:33,359 --> 03:00:40,800 McCullen. 4403 03:00:36,160 --> 03:00:44,479 » Yeah, I mean, adding charges and 4404 03:00:40,800 --> 03:00:47,680 updating DCC's, I it's a major impact. 4405 03:00:44,479 --> 03:00:50,399 It's a major change. Um, as has been 4406 03:00:47,680 --> 03:00:53,040 highlighted already tonight, our DCC 4407 03:00:50,399 --> 03:00:55,920 bylaw was more than a decade out of date 4408 03:00:53,040 --> 03:00:59,680 and it really hasn't been adjusted to 4409 03:00:55,920 --> 03:01:03,279 meet the rising costs of what 4410 03:00:59,680 --> 03:01:06,080 what our capital demands are. Um, and 4411 03:01:03,279 --> 03:01:08,160 then I I don't know if we've lost sight 4412 03:01:06,080 --> 03:01:10,560 of this to a degree and in kind of 4413 03:01:08,160 --> 03:01:13,200 getting into the details of this, but 4414 03:01:10,560 --> 03:01:15,600 the ACC's were brought on by the 4415 03:01:13,200 --> 03:01:17,840 province to provide certainty around 4416 03:01:15,600 --> 03:01:22,000 development costs in order to get rid of 4417 03:01:17,840 --> 03:01:25,520 what was um, you know, amenity 4418 03:01:22,000 --> 03:01:30,399 contribution negotiations at resoning. 4419 03:01:25,520 --> 03:01:33,120 And what we've done instead is um 4420 03:01:30,399 --> 03:01:35,760 implemented a major change to our zoning 4421 03:01:33,120 --> 03:01:37,760 bylaw that allows for much more 4422 03:01:35,760 --> 03:01:41,040 development to occur on development 4423 03:01:37,760 --> 03:01:42,800 lots. And and this is the trade-off. And 4424 03:01:41,040 --> 03:01:44,800 unless we proceed with that trade-off, 4425 03:01:42,800 --> 03:01:48,000 we don't really understand the impact. 4426 03:01:44,800 --> 03:01:50,399 There has been um a benefit provided. 4427 03:01:48,000 --> 03:01:53,120 We've we've reduced parking requirements 4428 03:01:50,399 --> 03:01:55,439 on just about every type of residential 4429 03:01:53,120 --> 03:01:58,160 development that can occur in the city. 4430 03:01:55,439 --> 03:02:00,720 We are allowing more to happen on on 4431 03:01:58,160 --> 03:02:04,080 single family lots all the way up to um 4432 03:02:00,720 --> 03:02:06,960 you know our highdensity areas and we've 4433 03:02:04,080 --> 03:02:09,680 given up the ability to negotiate um 4434 03:02:06,960 --> 03:02:12,160 amenities to come from those. So this 4435 03:02:09,680 --> 03:02:14,560 this is the tool that we have and um 4436 03:02:12,160 --> 03:02:20,479 this is the process that we've followed 4437 03:02:14,560 --> 03:02:23,359 um very thoroughly um with some very um 4438 03:02:20,479 --> 03:02:26,479 detailed reports and discussion that's 4439 03:02:23,359 --> 03:02:28,880 led up to this point. So um I'm I'm 4440 03:02:26,479 --> 03:02:31,040 fairly comfortable with where that is 4441 03:02:28,880 --> 03:02:35,520 and yeah it I mean it doesn't need to go 4442 03:02:31,040 --> 03:02:38,160 to the inspector of municipalities um 4443 03:02:35,520 --> 03:02:41,120 in the same way that the DCC's are. So 4444 03:02:38,160 --> 03:02:43,920 perhaps there will be changes to it. But 4445 03:02:41,120 --> 03:02:46,399 I would also remind that um I'm sure 4446 03:02:43,920 --> 03:02:48,479 that if we didn't change any of our 4447 03:02:46,399 --> 03:02:50,319 property taxes and did it all in one go, 4448 03:02:48,479 --> 03:02:52,640 it would be a major sticker shock too, 4449 03:02:50,319 --> 03:02:55,359 which is essentially what we have done 4450 03:02:52,640 --> 03:02:58,560 here. Um 4451 03:02:55,359 --> 03:03:01,200 and I mean our our previous discussion 4452 03:02:58,560 --> 03:03:03,520 tonight around um what we're grappling 4453 03:03:01,200 --> 03:03:05,840 with in terms of property taxation 4454 03:03:03,520 --> 03:03:08,240 increases. We we have a lot of 4455 03:03:05,840 --> 03:03:10,640 downloaded costs from higher levels of 4456 03:03:08,240 --> 03:03:14,240 government that used to get, you know, 4457 03:03:10,640 --> 03:03:15,920 66% of our capital. Um projects were 4458 03:03:14,240 --> 03:03:18,319 being funded and now we're being asked 4459 03:03:15,920 --> 03:03:20,800 to do, you know, at at our sewer 4460 03:03:18,319 --> 03:03:22,880 commission committee yesterday. We're 4461 03:03:20,800 --> 03:03:25,040 looking at a hund00 million project with 4462 03:03:22,880 --> 03:03:27,200 basically no funding from higher levels 4463 03:03:25,040 --> 03:03:29,600 of government. And the end result is 4464 03:03:27,200 --> 03:03:31,279 that we have to increase things um 4465 03:03:29,600 --> 03:03:33,680 faster than inflation as we're not 4466 03:03:31,279 --> 03:03:36,880 getting that support. So, the money has 4467 03:03:33,680 --> 03:03:40,479 to come from somewhere and I'm not 4468 03:03:36,880 --> 03:03:42,720 comfortable um asking our taxpayers to 4469 03:03:40,479 --> 03:03:46,880 take a bigger piece of that pie than 4470 03:03:42,720 --> 03:03:49,120 what's fair. So, um this is the the best 4471 03:03:46,880 --> 03:03:50,960 solution that we have at this point. And 4472 03:03:49,120 --> 03:03:53,840 yes, there are going to be impacts from 4473 03:03:50,960 --> 03:03:55,840 it. And um you know, if those impacts 4474 03:03:53,840 --> 03:03:58,640 end up being more than than what makes 4475 03:03:55,840 --> 03:04:00,960 sense, they they can be revisited. and 4476 03:03:58,640 --> 03:04:03,520 um I'm I'm comfortable proceeding with 4477 03:04:00,960 --> 03:04:06,520 what's in front of us um tonight. Thank 4478 03:04:03,520 --> 03:04:06,520 you. 4479 03:04:06,880 --> 03:04:12,720 » Thanks uh Councelor McCullum. Maybe I'll 4480 03:04:09,760 --> 03:04:16,160 just ask a clarifying question um uh 4481 03:04:12,720 --> 03:04:18,319 just because what keeps coming back to 4482 03:04:16,160 --> 03:04:21,680 us and again hopefully things don't 4483 03:04:18,319 --> 03:04:25,040 don't get delayed so long but um back in 4484 03:04:21,680 --> 03:04:26,720 2016 and then when we visit DCC's again 4485 03:04:25,040 --> 03:04:28,960 uh I know I asked the question around 4486 03:04:26,720 --> 03:04:31,680 CPI and whether or not CPI is 4487 03:04:28,960 --> 03:04:33,920 automatically um included in those 4488 03:04:31,680 --> 03:04:37,040 calculations. So going forward again we 4489 03:04:33,920 --> 03:04:39,920 can sit down and and re-evaluate those 4490 03:04:37,040 --> 03:04:44,720 projects. But just in the absence of 4491 03:04:39,920 --> 03:04:47,680 that uh happening um uh is there some 4492 03:04:44,720 --> 03:04:50,560 mechanism like CPI that keeps those 4493 03:04:47,680 --> 03:04:52,319 amounts going up so that we're not doing 4494 03:04:50,560 --> 03:04:54,399 this catch up like we are with with 4495 03:04:52,319 --> 03:04:56,479 DCC's right now. 4496 03:04:54,399 --> 03:04:59,600 » Uh Mr. Mayor, the best practice is to do 4497 03:04:56,479 --> 03:05:03,200 your dcc amendment every year to capture 4498 03:04:59,600 --> 03:05:04,240 that CPI amount. That that does not need 4499 03:05:03,200 --> 03:05:05,359 to go to the inspector of 4500 03:05:04,240 --> 03:05:07,040 municipalities, right? 4501 03:05:05,359 --> 03:05:09,279 » And I think what happened is the the 4502 03:05:07,040 --> 03:05:12,560 city also was not doing that until very 4503 03:05:09,279 --> 03:05:14,240 recently. So it really fell behind. Uh 4504 03:05:12,560 --> 03:05:17,279 so that would be a recommended best 4505 03:05:14,240 --> 03:05:20,560 practice for uh both bylaws. 4506 03:05:17,279 --> 03:05:22,240 » Okay. Um 4507 03:05:20,560 --> 03:05:25,520 um All right. I appreciate that uh 4508 03:05:22,240 --> 03:05:27,200 clarification. and councelor Brish. 4509 03:05:25,520 --> 03:05:31,120 » Yeah, thanks. I have two two more 4510 03:05:27,200 --> 03:05:35,040 questions. Um, one is around the sort of 4511 03:05:31,120 --> 03:05:36,560 all-in DCC and ACC costs per per unit 4512 03:05:35,040 --> 03:05:40,319 per square meter. I guess we have the 4513 03:05:36,560 --> 03:05:41,840 three different densities and um, do we 4514 03:05:40,319 --> 03:05:43,600 have that number that includes the 4515 03:05:41,840 --> 03:05:45,680 regional district and the Courtney's 4516 03:05:43,600 --> 03:05:47,279 proposed numbers? 4517 03:05:45,680 --> 03:05:49,279 And I'm sorry I'm trying to dig up the 4518 03:05:47,279 --> 03:05:51,520 dcc's from the last discussion and add 4519 03:05:49,279 --> 03:05:53,439 them into the ACC's but is that 4520 03:05:51,520 --> 03:05:55,439 something that is possible to share with 4521 03:05:53,439 --> 03:05:57,120 me at this time like what is it let's 4522 03:05:55,439 --> 03:05:59,920 just talk about a house simple house 4523 03:05:57,120 --> 03:06:01,680 like what is the full number? 4524 03:05:59,920 --> 03:06:03,600 » Yeah through the chair I mean that 4525 03:06:01,680 --> 03:06:06,080 information has been presented to 4526 03:06:03,600 --> 03:06:09,600 council previously. Uh you know I want 4527 03:06:06,080 --> 03:06:12,160 to look at the exact bylaw that the CVRD 4528 03:06:09,600 --> 03:06:15,279 uh did adopt. Uh we could probably find 4529 03:06:12,160 --> 03:06:18,399 it pretty quickly. I think there the low 4530 03:06:15,279 --> 03:06:22,160 density charge was roughly $18,000 a lot 4531 03:06:18,399 --> 03:06:24,240 for the sewer and um Miss Okonnell might 4532 03:06:22,160 --> 03:06:26,720 be pulling it up uh for the other 4533 03:06:24,240 --> 03:06:28,880 charges that you know significantly 4534 03:06:26,720 --> 03:06:33,439 decrease decrease from there. 4535 03:06:28,880 --> 03:06:36,399 » Yeah. Yeah. I did get the dcc's um that 4536 03:06:33,439 --> 03:06:40,319 we had for the RD and Courtney 4537 03:06:36,399 --> 03:06:43,319 and then I guess um is he RD doing ACC's 4538 03:06:40,319 --> 03:06:43,319 or 4539 03:06:47,760 --> 03:06:51,600 » Oh, sorry Saunders. 4540 03:06:50,000 --> 03:06:54,560 » I was that close. 4541 03:06:51,600 --> 03:06:56,560 » Thank you. The mayor of councelor Fr. Uh 4542 03:06:54,560 --> 03:06:59,600 the regional district has given staff 4543 03:06:56,560 --> 03:07:01,520 direction to uh look into an ACC, but 4544 03:06:59,600 --> 03:07:03,200 they have not uh they were staff were 4545 03:07:01,520 --> 03:07:05,520 waiting for direction from the 4546 03:07:03,200 --> 03:07:08,000 recreation commission on the uh new 4547 03:07:05,520 --> 03:07:09,279 arena or the additional arena. Now that 4548 03:07:08,000 --> 03:07:10,720 they've received that direction and they 4549 03:07:09,279 --> 03:07:13,760 know what type of arena they're planning 4550 03:07:10,720 --> 03:07:16,000 for, uh they expect to start working on 4551 03:07:13,760 --> 03:07:18,000 uh ECC's this year. So they have not 4552 03:07:16,000 --> 03:07:20,080 started that process. Um but they will 4553 03:07:18,000 --> 03:07:22,000 be starting it this year. 4554 03:07:20,080 --> 03:07:24,800 » Great. Thanks for that. I guess I guess 4555 03:07:22,000 --> 03:07:26,560 my my interest is in looking into um an 4556 03:07:24,800 --> 03:07:27,920 assist factor on both. And it doesn't 4557 03:07:26,560 --> 03:07:30,319 maybe it doesn't have to be huge. I'm 4558 03:07:27,920 --> 03:07:32,800 actually um not exactly clear on what 4559 03:07:30,319 --> 03:07:36,479 the old numbers are were to what the new 4560 03:07:32,800 --> 03:07:38,080 numbers will be. And um I don't know if 4561 03:07:36,479 --> 03:07:39,680 I've had enough time to contemplate what 4562 03:07:38,080 --> 03:07:42,160 kind of assist factor I'd even be 4563 03:07:39,680 --> 03:07:46,880 willing to give um let alone the rest of 4564 03:07:42,160 --> 03:07:48,399 council. So um yeah, I'd love Sorry, go 4565 03:07:46,880 --> 03:07:50,399 ahead. If you have more information, I' 4566 03:07:48,399 --> 03:07:53,200 I'd take it. It sounded like someone was 4567 03:07:50,399 --> 03:07:55,439 going to speak there. Nope, not yet. And 4568 03:07:53,200 --> 03:07:58,640 so I'm I'm I'm inclined to ask for that 4569 03:07:55,439 --> 03:08:00,399 information um for ACC's at least. And 4570 03:07:58,640 --> 03:08:02,319 then knowing that I'll probably ask the 4571 03:08:00,399 --> 03:08:05,319 same thing when the DCC bylaw comes 4572 03:08:02,319 --> 03:08:05,319 back. 4573 03:08:15,520 --> 03:08:20,960 So maybe while we're waiting, we can 4574 03:08:17,120 --> 03:08:25,359 move on to the council more. 4575 03:08:20,960 --> 03:08:28,240 » Yeah. I mean, uh, councelor McCollum 4576 03:08:25,359 --> 03:08:31,120 gave some examples of how we're trying 4577 03:08:28,240 --> 03:08:33,279 to help developers 4578 03:08:31,120 --> 03:08:36,479 with costs like the parking and things 4579 03:08:33,279 --> 03:08:39,680 like that. And I know that um our city 4580 03:08:36,479 --> 03:08:41,840 manager had uh had mentioned this before 4581 03:08:39,680 --> 03:08:47,279 around some of those other policy 4582 03:08:41,840 --> 03:08:49,439 changes um in terms of of helping to 4583 03:08:47,279 --> 03:08:52,560 alleviate some of the costs. So I'm just 4584 03:08:49,439 --> 03:08:54,479 curious whether um Mr. but feels 4585 03:08:52,560 --> 03:08:56,560 comfortable with talking about some 4586 03:08:54,479 --> 03:09:00,399 other things that are in the pipeline to 4587 03:08:56,560 --> 03:09:04,279 offset you know some of the 4588 03:09:00,399 --> 03:09:04,279 some of this uh 4589 03:09:05,840 --> 03:09:09,200 » And if you don't you know through the 4590 03:09:07,279 --> 03:09:12,399 mayor it's just I I don't want to 4591 03:09:09,200 --> 03:09:14,399 overstate I mean we we're working uh 4592 03:09:12,399 --> 03:09:15,840 with council direction on a number of 4593 03:09:14,399 --> 03:09:18,000 adjustments and we had talked about 4594 03:09:15,840 --> 03:09:21,680 adjustments uh council column talked 4595 03:09:18,000 --> 03:09:23,840 about that um we're uh with the 4596 03:09:21,680 --> 03:09:27,359 direction of our acting director. We're 4597 03:09:23,840 --> 03:09:31,600 working on our processes. Um 4598 03:09:27,359 --> 03:09:36,160 we've had uh improvements in the return 4599 03:09:31,600 --> 03:09:39,040 of uh bonding and costing. That's that's 4600 03:09:36,160 --> 03:09:40,720 an impact for developers. I I don't have 4601 03:09:39,040 --> 03:09:45,439 a detailed list right in front of me 4602 03:09:40,720 --> 03:09:48,720 right now. However, um uh you know, 4603 03:09:45,439 --> 03:09:54,240 forming uh good working groups to try 4604 03:09:48,720 --> 03:09:56,160 and engage uh uh grant resources. Um we 4605 03:09:54,240 --> 03:09:58,800 mentioned CFP Comox as a bit of a 4606 03:09:56,160 --> 03:10:00,479 catalyzing factor right now. Um a lot of 4607 03:09:58,800 --> 03:10:02,800 that is going to impact all forms of 4608 03:10:00,479 --> 03:10:05,439 infrastructure in the community. uh 4609 03:10:02,800 --> 03:10:09,279 forming a a you know a working group or 4610 03:10:05,439 --> 03:10:11,200 task force on uh trying to uh both speed 4611 03:10:09,279 --> 03:10:14,720 development applications, raise the 4612 03:10:11,200 --> 03:10:17,120 priority of our community for um grant 4613 03:10:14,720 --> 03:10:19,920 applications which 4614 03:10:17,120 --> 03:10:21,840 our uh colleague has talked about how we 4615 03:10:19,920 --> 03:10:26,479 would amend development cost charges for 4616 03:10:21,840 --> 03:10:30,000 that. Um speeding our uh processes uh 4617 03:10:26,479 --> 03:10:32,319 ultimately uh amending zoning in areas. 4618 03:10:30,000 --> 03:10:33,600 Um, one of our large, well, basically 4619 03:10:32,319 --> 03:10:36,160 the largest developer in our community 4620 03:10:33,600 --> 03:10:38,399 has pre-zoneed land that staff are 4621 03:10:36,160 --> 03:10:39,840 working right now with great development 4622 03:10:38,399 --> 03:10:42,640 consultants that are working on behalf 4623 03:10:39,840 --> 03:10:45,680 of that development to, um, fine-tune 4624 03:10:42,640 --> 03:10:46,960 and and address the market. 4625 03:10:45,680 --> 03:10:48,880 » These are some of the things that we're 4626 03:10:46,960 --> 03:10:51,600 doing. Um 4627 03:10:48,880 --> 03:10:55,680 uh sorry that that that the complaint. 4628 03:10:51,600 --> 03:11:00,479 Um likewise um you know um making sure 4629 03:10:55,680 --> 03:11:02,640 that we have uh better uh and more um 4630 03:11:00,479 --> 03:11:05,760 effective customer service in place to 4631 03:11:02,640 --> 03:11:06,960 move applications through um is a is a 4632 03:11:05,760 --> 03:11:09,359 critical component because time is 4633 03:11:06,960 --> 03:11:11,040 money. And then uh just as as recently 4634 03:11:09,359 --> 03:11:12,640 as yesterday, I know that elected 4635 03:11:11,040 --> 03:11:14,960 officials met with uh development 4636 03:11:12,640 --> 03:11:16,319 community, but we talked about the city 4637 03:11:14,960 --> 03:11:18,880 trying to engage with the other 4638 03:11:16,319 --> 03:11:20,319 regulatory agencies um that affect the 4639 03:11:18,880 --> 03:11:22,800 development process. But the these are 4640 03:11:20,319 --> 03:11:25,279 just examples and and and we've we've 4641 03:11:22,800 --> 03:11:27,279 all heard about timelines uh very 4642 03:11:25,279 --> 03:11:30,640 extended timelines. Council dealt with 4643 03:11:27,279 --> 03:11:34,080 an extended timeline uh expeditiously uh 4644 03:11:30,640 --> 03:11:36,800 once uh we uh received some really clear 4645 03:11:34,080 --> 03:11:39,040 direction. Um but those are examples. 4646 03:11:36,800 --> 03:11:41,279 Um, and I I know my head colleagues are 4647 03:11:39,040 --> 03:11:45,040 doing some uh additional work. Feel like 4648 03:11:41,279 --> 03:11:46,960 I might be holding airspace. [laughter] 4649 03:11:45,040 --> 03:11:48,240 » All right, I see Miss Okonnell's 4650 03:11:46,960 --> 03:11:50,880 microphone's ready. 4651 03:11:48,240 --> 03:11:52,640 » So, the quickest place I could find the 4652 03:11:50,880 --> 03:11:55,520 majority of the information of all the 4653 03:11:52,640 --> 03:11:58,160 different pieces was actually on the 4654 03:11:55,520 --> 03:12:00,080 engage page where we provided all the 4655 03:11:58,160 --> 03:12:04,080 materials and if this was directly from 4656 03:12:00,080 --> 03:12:08,160 one of the presentations. Um so as an uh 4657 03:12:04,080 --> 03:12:10,160 an example the um DCC's or the draft 4658 03:12:08,160 --> 03:12:12,399 rates for Courtney at the time well were 4659 03:12:10,160 --> 03:12:15,920 21 for sorry for a low density 4660 03:12:12,399 --> 03:12:18,479 residential as an example were 21,337 4661 03:12:15,920 --> 03:12:22,279 for the town of Komox for the same it 4662 03:12:18,479 --> 03:12:22,279 was uh 30,792 4663 03:12:22,479 --> 03:12:25,720 um for 4664 03:12:26,960 --> 03:12:32,319 » Okay 4665 03:12:28,000 --> 03:12:34,880 » And then for the um CBRD So for the 4666 03:12:32,319 --> 03:12:36,880 sewer it's for low density residential 4667 03:12:34,880 --> 03:12:39,840 it's $18,042. 4668 03:12:36,880 --> 03:12:43,840 For medium residential it's uh 9,800 and 4669 03:12:39,840 --> 03:12:45,279 change. Um so when you combine those 4670 03:12:43,840 --> 03:12:47,279 rates there's like five different 4671 03:12:45,279 --> 03:12:50,399 categories. You'd have to add each of 4672 03:12:47,279 --> 03:12:52,960 them up. But we're consistent with our 4673 03:12:50,399 --> 03:12:56,880 municipal comparators across both um 4674 03:12:52,960 --> 03:12:59,040 ACC's and DCC's and or below. 4675 03:12:56,880 --> 03:13:00,560 » If I could just thanks for that. I know 4676 03:12:59,040 --> 03:13:01,359 we're sort of mixing two discussions 4677 03:13:00,560 --> 03:13:02,960 here. 4678 03:13:01,359 --> 03:13:04,479 » Um, 4679 03:13:02,960 --> 03:13:06,399 one of the reasons I bring that up is 4680 03:13:04,479 --> 03:13:08,160 because, you know, we also heard from 4681 03:13:06,399 --> 03:13:12,319 the development community that, you 4682 03:13:08,160 --> 03:13:14,080 know, time is money as well. And I know 4683 03:13:12,319 --> 03:13:16,800 this would have been probably at least a 4684 03:13:14,080 --> 03:13:18,800 couple years ago now. Um the regional 4685 03:13:16,800 --> 03:13:22,399 district was getting a a lot of grief 4686 03:13:18,800 --> 03:13:25,760 around um their delayed timelines and 4687 03:13:22,399 --> 03:13:29,840 the electoral areas services committee 4688 03:13:25,760 --> 03:13:32,800 um gave some really clear direction um 4689 03:13:29,840 --> 03:13:36,720 to deal with that. And so what resulted 4690 03:13:32,800 --> 03:13:38,880 was um they gave direction for you know 4691 03:13:36,720 --> 03:13:43,040 additional resources and staff to get 4692 03:13:38,880 --> 03:13:45,840 through that backlog of applications and 4693 03:13:43,040 --> 03:13:48,080 they went from I think 3 or 4 months to 4694 03:13:45,840 --> 03:13:51,600 like 2 or 3 weeks or something and that 4695 03:13:48,080 --> 03:13:53,120 was a couple years ago now. So I think 4696 03:13:51,600 --> 03:13:56,640 you know I guess this speaks to the 4697 03:13:53,120 --> 03:14:00,960 whole engagement piece as well. Um, I 4698 03:13:56,640 --> 03:14:03,680 think whatever we can do to act on those 4699 03:14:00,960 --> 03:14:06,160 other things that are costing 4700 03:14:03,680 --> 03:14:08,800 costing money and and responding to that 4701 03:14:06,160 --> 03:14:11,040 in a in a really clear direct way I 4702 03:14:08,800 --> 03:14:14,080 think um I think is important like it 4703 03:14:11,040 --> 03:14:15,920 can be done. I think, you know, staff 4704 03:14:14,080 --> 03:14:18,080 couldn't, you know, decide that on their 4705 03:14:15,920 --> 03:14:20,000 own. That needed to come from the 4706 03:14:18,080 --> 03:14:24,479 electoral directors. But it's just one 4707 03:14:20,000 --> 03:14:28,720 example of um I think just being more 4708 03:14:24,479 --> 03:14:33,040 um I guess just having a better read on 4709 03:14:28,720 --> 03:14:36,080 on how those costs um 4710 03:14:33,040 --> 03:14:39,200 uh yeah those additional costs um 4711 03:14:36,080 --> 03:14:41,520 acknowledging that you know that's not 4712 03:14:39,200 --> 03:14:44,720 necessarily part of this discussion but 4713 03:14:41,520 --> 03:14:46,160 just part of the whole picture. Thanks. 4714 03:14:44,720 --> 03:14:47,840 Thanks, Councelor Morren. And yeah, and 4715 03:14:46,160 --> 03:14:50,720 I and I think that there was definitely 4716 03:14:47,840 --> 03:14:53,120 a commitment uh uh uh probably from 4717 03:14:50,720 --> 03:14:56,160 across mo most of the counselors to to 4718 03:14:53,120 --> 03:14:57,760 uh put some energy um and to make sure 4719 03:14:56,160 --> 03:15:00,239 that we're having those ongoing 4720 03:14:57,760 --> 03:15:01,920 conversations, but also uh when when 4721 03:15:00,239 --> 03:15:03,600 it's appropriate and and it's possible 4722 03:15:01,920 --> 03:15:07,279 that we're advocating for other things 4723 03:15:03,600 --> 03:15:10,479 that are uh causing these um projects to 4724 03:15:07,279 --> 03:15:12,560 lose their viability. And so Cichi um 4725 03:15:10,479 --> 03:15:14,479 fees which have doubled and and other 4726 03:15:12,560 --> 03:15:17,760 things are are places where we can be 4727 03:15:14,479 --> 03:15:19,600 advocating um not just uh within 4728 03:15:17,760 --> 03:15:22,239 ourselves and within the the Komox 4729 03:15:19,600 --> 03:15:25,520 Valley but with the provincial and and 4730 03:15:22,239 --> 03:15:28,720 federal counterparts uh that are um 4731 03:15:25,520 --> 03:15:30,160 having a deep impact on on the viability 4732 03:15:28,720 --> 03:15:34,960 of a lot of these projects as well 4733 03:15:30,160 --> 03:15:36,880 beyond um ACC's and DCC's. Um and with 4734 03:15:34,960 --> 03:15:39,600 that I'll pass over to councelor Fresh. 4735 03:15:36,880 --> 03:15:41,200 » Yeah, thanks Mayor. So, um I just 4736 03:15:39,600 --> 03:15:43,920 quickly added up the numbers that you 4737 03:15:41,200 --> 03:15:45,840 gave me. Thanks very much. And so for a 4738 03:15:43,920 --> 03:15:47,680 single family unit, it looks to be 4739 03:15:45,840 --> 03:15:50,800 around $46,000 4740 03:15:47,680 --> 03:15:54,000 per door. Um that's seven coming from 4741 03:15:50,800 --> 03:15:57,040 our ECC's, 18 from the regional 18,000 4742 03:15:54,000 --> 03:15:59,040 from the regional district and um and 21 4743 03:15:57,040 --> 03:16:01,439 from Courtney. 4744 03:15:59,040 --> 03:16:04,479 And then the um medium density is 4745 03:16:01,439 --> 03:16:07,520 $25,000 a door which is three and a half 4746 03:16:04,479 --> 03:16:10,880 from our ECC's and 10,000 from the RDS 4747 03:16:07,520 --> 03:16:14,880 dcc and 12 from our DCC's. And then 4748 03:16:10,880 --> 03:16:20,479 finally the um high density is around 4749 03:16:14,880 --> 03:16:22,640 $260 per square meter. Um which I always 4750 03:16:20,479 --> 03:16:25,279 think about a thousand uh like square 4751 03:16:22,640 --> 03:16:27,200 foot unit, but maybe that's even big. 4752 03:16:25,279 --> 03:16:29,840 Maybe they're building 750s. I don't 4753 03:16:27,200 --> 03:16:31,840 know. But um that puts it in a similar 4754 03:16:29,840 --> 03:16:36,000 range to the medium density depending on 4755 03:16:31,840 --> 03:16:37,120 how big of a unit you build. So um I 4756 03:16:36,000 --> 03:16:39,359 guess that's where we're at and I just 4757 03:16:37,120 --> 03:16:40,640 wanted like that's kind of the all-in 4758 03:16:39,359 --> 03:16:42,160 number and it's worth looking at because 4759 03:16:40,640 --> 03:16:44,560 if we piece it out into little bits, 4760 03:16:42,160 --> 03:16:47,680 it's kind of hard to fathom what what um 4761 03:16:44,560 --> 03:16:49,760 the industry is up against. And so I 4762 03:16:47,680 --> 03:16:53,040 just want to share that I that we're 4763 03:16:49,760 --> 03:16:54,560 hearing those numbers um aren't possible 4764 03:16:53,040 --> 03:16:57,120 and it's going to scare away development 4765 03:16:54,560 --> 03:16:58,640 or or just make it not possible. So, in 4766 03:16:57,120 --> 03:17:01,040 light of that, I I would be interested 4767 03:16:58,640 --> 03:17:04,479 in hearing about what an assist factor 4768 03:17:01,040 --> 03:17:07,200 of say 5 and 10% might mean for us and 4769 03:17:04,479 --> 03:17:09,920 how that would change the numbers 4770 03:17:07,200 --> 03:17:12,000 compared to the old numbers. Um, and 4771 03:17:09,920 --> 03:17:14,399 wonder if we can do that for just, you 4772 03:17:12,000 --> 03:17:16,239 know, a year or two like to ease to ease 4773 03:17:14,399 --> 03:17:18,800 the development community into this idea 4774 03:17:16,239 --> 03:17:20,560 of these new fees. Uh, is that possible 4775 03:17:18,800 --> 03:17:23,200 to say we want to do an assist factor 4776 03:17:20,560 --> 03:17:27,200 for one year and then review it or two 4777 03:17:23,200 --> 03:17:27,200 years or whatever? 4778 03:17:27,520 --> 03:17:31,040 Thank you chair. It's absolutely 4779 03:17:29,120 --> 03:17:33,920 possible. That's council's discretion 4780 03:17:31,040 --> 03:17:36,800 and it's just as staff has noted it will 4781 03:17:33,920 --> 03:17:39,279 impact uh cost to the taxpayer by that 4782 03:17:36,800 --> 03:17:42,399 amount. But it's absolutely possible for 4783 03:17:39,279 --> 03:17:45,040 council to provide that direction. Um 4784 03:17:42,399 --> 03:17:47,600 and you could do that solely for the ACC 4785 03:17:45,040 --> 03:17:50,880 program. Uh if you wish you could apply 4786 03:17:47,600 --> 03:17:52,479 it the same as this factor to the DCC 4787 03:17:50,880 --> 03:17:55,200 program as a whole or you could also 4788 03:17:52,479 --> 03:17:58,000 apply it just to say transportation for 4789 03:17:55,200 --> 03:17:59,600 example um that would be at council's 4790 03:17:58,000 --> 03:18:01,520 discretion. 4791 03:17:59,600 --> 03:18:03,520 » The one thing I would note though if 4792 03:18:01,520 --> 03:18:07,200 you're if council wishes to direct 4793 03:18:03,520 --> 03:18:10,479 changes um to the assist factor to the 4794 03:18:07,200 --> 03:18:12,239 development cost charge uh we do have 4795 03:18:10,479 --> 03:18:14,399 that in at the inspector of 4796 03:18:12,239 --> 03:18:17,200 municipalities. So, we I can't imagine 4797 03:18:14,399 --> 03:18:19,120 it influencing um their approval of the 4798 03:18:17,200 --> 03:18:20,560 bylaws, but they do sign off on the 4799 03:18:19,120 --> 03:18:22,560 bylaws. So, we'd want to do that 4800 03:18:20,560 --> 03:18:27,279 amendment and provide that update to 4801 03:18:22,560 --> 03:18:28,960 them uh while they're in their review. 4802 03:18:27,279 --> 03:18:31,040 » Well, we would basically put them on 4803 03:18:28,960 --> 03:18:33,120 hold. Yeah. And would would it make 4804 03:18:31,040 --> 03:18:36,399 mathematical sense to assume that if 4805 03:18:33,120 --> 03:18:39,120 we're giving a 5% assist factor that it 4806 03:18:36,399 --> 03:18:42,880 would decrease those per door costs by 4807 03:18:39,120 --> 03:18:46,720 about 5% for for our portion for our DCC 4808 03:18:42,880 --> 03:18:48,960 or our ACC or is it am I missing missing 4809 03:18:46,720 --> 03:18:50,880 the calculation a bit 4810 03:18:48,960 --> 03:18:54,319 » Through the chair? Yeah, the 5% would be 4811 03:18:50,880 --> 03:18:57,040 based on the developer's portion and 4812 03:18:54,319 --> 03:18:58,640 then that savings just or that savings 4813 03:18:57,040 --> 03:19:00,000 that the developer has just gets 4814 03:18:58,640 --> 03:19:01,040 transferred to the municipal 4815 03:19:00,000 --> 03:19:01,359 responsibility, 4816 03:19:01,040 --> 03:19:03,680 » Right? 4817 03:19:01,359 --> 03:19:06,640 » Um but we could illustrate how that 4818 03:19:03,680 --> 03:19:08,080 assist factor um is impact in a in a 4819 03:19:06,640 --> 03:19:09,920 separate column essentially for 4820 03:19:08,080 --> 03:19:14,160 council's consideration at a future 4821 03:19:09,920 --> 03:19:15,840 time. Yeah, I I mean I'm having a hard 4822 03:19:14,160 --> 03:19:17,520 time understanding what is going to make 4823 03:19:15,840 --> 03:19:20,800 and what's going to break development 4824 03:19:17,520 --> 03:19:23,359 and um but it has been argued that of 4825 03:19:20,800 --> 03:19:25,520 course if you get far less development 4826 03:19:23,359 --> 03:19:28,239 then you're going to get far less DCC's 4827 03:19:25,520 --> 03:19:30,399 and ACC's as well. So that's what I'm 4828 03:19:28,239 --> 03:19:32,000 contemplating. Um I see one more light 4829 03:19:30,399 --> 03:19:33,520 two more lights so I'm going to let go. 4830 03:19:32,000 --> 03:19:35,840 Thanks. 4831 03:19:33,520 --> 03:19:37,200 Thanks, Councelor Fish and uh Council 4832 03:19:35,840 --> 03:19:39,279 Helen. And I just want to acknowledge 4833 03:19:37,200 --> 03:19:40,560 that we're way past the 6:30 deadline 4834 03:19:39,279 --> 03:19:42,560 that I thought we would have for dinner. 4835 03:19:40,560 --> 03:19:45,359 So, I do I'm just going to apologize 4836 03:19:42,560 --> 03:19:46,880 right now. I know we're uh probably 4837 03:19:45,359 --> 03:19:50,399 starving, so I just want to acknowledge, 4838 03:19:46,880 --> 03:19:54,080 but councelor, floor is yours. 4839 03:19:50,399 --> 03:19:56,560 » Yes, decisions made when uh hungry and 4840 03:19:54,080 --> 03:19:59,359 tired. Um 4841 03:19:56,560 --> 03:20:01,840 so there's there's one part of this that 4842 03:19:59,359 --> 03:20:03,439 still confuses me and and um when I 4843 03:20:01,840 --> 03:20:06,239 asked the question earlier about the 4844 03:20:03,439 --> 03:20:08,000 time um it would take for the uh 4845 03:20:06,239 --> 03:20:11,120 implementation 4846 03:20:08,000 --> 03:20:13,520 um part of what I was mindful of was in 4847 03:20:11,120 --> 03:20:16,160 the um the guide for elected officials 4848 03:20:13,520 --> 03:20:19,520 that uh we were provided with which was 4849 03:20:16,160 --> 03:20:22,960 referenced in the staff report there's a 4850 03:20:19,520 --> 03:20:26,160 section that um talks about um assessing 4851 03:20:22,960 --> 03:20:28,000 potential development impact act and it 4852 03:20:26,160 --> 03:20:30,479 says staff will evaluate and advise 4853 03:20:28,000 --> 03:20:32,800 elected officials whether proposed ACC's 4854 03:20:30,479 --> 03:20:34,479 will deter development or discourage the 4855 03:20:32,800 --> 03:20:37,680 construction of reasonably priced 4856 03:20:34,479 --> 03:20:40,239 housing adjustments by elected officials 4857 03:20:37,680 --> 03:20:44,800 to the assist factor or providing a 4858 03:20:40,239 --> 03:20:47,600 grace period or phasing in of ACC's 4859 03:20:44,800 --> 03:20:49,120 rates could be considered at this stage. 4860 03:20:47,600 --> 03:20:50,880 So, 4861 03:20:49,120 --> 03:20:52,640 forgive me if I missed it, but have we 4862 03:20:50,880 --> 03:20:54,479 have we considered the possibility of 4863 03:20:52,640 --> 03:20:58,080 phasing in and what that would involve 4864 03:20:54,479 --> 03:20:58,800 and what the pros and cons of that 4865 03:20:58,080 --> 03:21:00,800 » Mr. Gman? 4866 03:20:58,800 --> 03:21:03,279 » Yeah, thank you. 4867 03:21:00,800 --> 03:21:05,760 Are we had responded that we council 4868 03:21:03,279 --> 03:21:09,040 gave direction on the cis factor, give 4869 03:21:05,760 --> 03:21:10,560 direction on those timing? We we have 4870 03:21:09,040 --> 03:21:12,239 responded to that. So I what I have not 4871 03:21:10,560 --> 03:21:14,640 heard is any actual direction from 4872 03:21:12,239 --> 03:21:17,120 council in terms of would you like to 4873 03:21:14,640 --> 03:21:19,279 consider this for send it back for some 4874 03:21:17,120 --> 03:21:21,840 more information you know we do need 4875 03:21:19,279 --> 03:21:24,239 some some direction you have received uh 4876 03:21:21,840 --> 03:21:27,279 with respect to ACC specifically we 4877 03:21:24,239 --> 03:21:29,439 engaged net it was not missenderson's 4878 03:21:27,279 --> 03:21:31,040 firm we had a secondary firm do an 4879 03:21:29,439 --> 03:21:33,200 economic analysis that was included in 4880 03:21:31,040 --> 03:21:35,279 the original information that was 4881 03:21:33,200 --> 03:21:37,439 provided to council that we were 4882 03:21:35,279 --> 03:21:39,840 referencing that u that was a step that 4883 03:21:37,439 --> 03:21:42,720 we did specifically um in accordance 4884 03:21:39,840 --> 03:21:44,239 with the best practice guide. Um, and 4885 03:21:42,720 --> 03:21:46,720 you've received information from 4886 03:21:44,239 --> 03:21:48,960 developers that it will impede and so we 4887 03:21:46,720 --> 03:21:51,600 have a difference of opinion. Uh, 4888 03:21:48,960 --> 03:21:52,720 ultimately you could ask you give us 4889 03:21:51,600 --> 03:21:56,399 direction to get some more information 4890 03:21:52,720 --> 03:21:58,560 on the impact of assist factors um about 4891 03:21:56,399 --> 03:22:00,080 the timeline and etc. And so that I mean 4892 03:21:58,560 --> 03:22:02,640 we we can't really give you any guidance 4893 03:22:00,080 --> 03:22:05,920 about that uh in terms of what but it is 4894 03:22:02,640 --> 03:22:08,479 in fact possible yes to do that um and 4895 03:22:05,920 --> 03:22:11,960 uh um we we would take council's 4896 03:22:08,479 --> 03:22:11,960 direction in that regard. 4897 03:22:12,479 --> 03:22:19,080 » Thanks Mr. Urban and um Council McCullum 4898 03:22:19,279 --> 03:22:24,880 » At the risk of lengthening this 4899 03:22:21,120 --> 03:22:27,520 discussion. Um just I I I found the 4900 03:22:24,880 --> 03:22:29,359 summary of the calculation of all these 4901 03:22:27,520 --> 03:22:32,880 different fees coming in helpful. I 4902 03:22:29,359 --> 03:22:35,840 think we did see some of that way back 4903 03:22:32,880 --> 03:22:37,520 in this discussion but um I think it's 4904 03:22:35,840 --> 03:22:39,840 good to revisit. But then the other 4905 03:22:37,520 --> 03:22:42,880 piece that I just wanted staff to 4906 03:22:39,840 --> 03:22:45,279 clarify on record with the largest one 4907 03:22:42,880 --> 03:22:47,200 being what we call a single family lot, 4908 03:22:45,279 --> 03:22:51,040 which is of course no longer a single 4909 03:22:47,200 --> 03:22:53,840 family lot at all and that um you could 4910 03:22:51,040 --> 03:22:56,560 do a lot more than single family. 4911 03:22:53,840 --> 03:23:01,040 What is the maximum number of units that 4912 03:22:56,560 --> 03:23:04,880 can fit on um a lot under that um 40 4913 03:23:01,040 --> 03:23:06,800 some odd thousand dcc? 4914 03:23:04,880 --> 03:23:08,720 » Do the chair. Um just a point of 4915 03:23:06,800 --> 03:23:11,120 clarification on the low density charge 4916 03:23:08,720 --> 03:23:13,680 from your old bylaw. So your old bylaw 4917 03:23:11,120 --> 03:23:15,520 you would require the single detached 4918 03:23:13,680 --> 03:23:17,279 house and then there would be a fee for 4919 03:23:15,520 --> 03:23:19,120 both the city and the regional district 4920 03:23:17,279 --> 03:23:21,520 for carriage homes where the new 4921 03:23:19,120 --> 03:23:26,319 lowdensity charge includes a carriage 4922 03:23:21,520 --> 03:23:28,880 home, a suite and a um and this the main 4923 03:23:26,319 --> 03:23:31,680 dwelling. And then if you were to do a 4924 03:23:28,880 --> 03:23:34,800 duplex, you would essentially charge two 4925 03:23:31,680 --> 03:23:37,359 medium density uh charges, which isn't 4926 03:23:34,800 --> 03:23:39,920 that all that different from just a 4927 03:23:37,359 --> 03:23:43,359 little bit more uh than the single low 4928 03:23:39,920 --> 03:23:45,520 density charge. So that's why comparing 4929 03:23:43,359 --> 03:23:47,520 the old rates to the new rates is apples 4930 03:23:45,520 --> 03:23:49,680 to oranges because there's more that's 4931 03:23:47,520 --> 03:23:52,000 allowed under under that first rate and 4932 03:23:49,680 --> 03:23:53,600 then the uh carriage home if you had a 4933 03:23:52,000 --> 03:23:56,080 second carriage home would go to the 4934 03:23:53,600 --> 03:23:58,239 apartment rate. I think it's also 4935 03:23:56,080 --> 03:24:00,880 important to note and I can't speak for 4936 03:23:58,239 --> 03:24:02,960 them but the city squared work uh that 4937 03:24:00,880 --> 03:24:05,359 was done also was looking at 4938 03:24:02,960 --> 03:24:08,000 inclusionary zoning uh which was another 4939 03:24:05,359 --> 03:24:10,640 tool that council could have used um and 4940 03:24:08,000 --> 03:24:13,279 it and it's basically recognized that 4941 03:24:10,640 --> 03:24:15,680 you couldn't have the increased DCC's 4942 03:24:13,279 --> 03:24:18,080 the ACC's and inclusionary zoning. So my 4943 03:24:15,680 --> 03:24:19,920 understanding was that council did um 4944 03:24:18,080 --> 03:24:22,640 sort of move away from the requirement 4945 03:24:19,920 --> 03:24:25,120 of inclusionary zoning. So that's like 4946 03:24:22,640 --> 03:24:27,439 another example that that council 4947 03:24:25,120 --> 03:24:28,880 already considered uh when looking at 4948 03:24:27,439 --> 03:24:31,040 the rates. Like I think there's been a 4949 03:24:28,880 --> 03:24:34,080 number of concessions over the course of 4950 03:24:31,040 --> 03:24:36,399 this um study, including the reduction 4951 03:24:34,080 --> 03:24:40,319 of the number of projects on the ACC 4952 03:24:36,399 --> 03:24:43,359 list and the parks list um to try to fit 4953 03:24:40,319 --> 03:24:46,160 it in to what would be uh financially 4954 03:24:43,359 --> 03:24:49,120 viable for certain uh types of 4955 03:24:46,160 --> 03:24:50,800 development. right now in this market. I 4956 03:24:49,120 --> 03:24:52,640 mean, there's people in the room that 4957 03:24:50,800 --> 03:24:54,239 could clearly tell you that there's a 4958 03:24:52,640 --> 03:24:57,279 lot of development that just clearly 4959 03:24:54,239 --> 03:25:00,399 isn't viable under the existing DCC or a 4960 03:24:57,279 --> 03:25:01,920 future DCC. But the uh land use 4961 03:25:00,399 --> 03:25:04,560 economics work that I believe city 4962 03:25:01,920 --> 03:25:06,479 square did did illustrate um with some 4963 03:25:04,560 --> 03:25:08,080 upzoning and other things that the city 4964 03:25:06,479 --> 03:25:10,479 is looking at that there were some 4965 03:25:08,080 --> 03:25:12,080 developments based on the charges not 4966 03:25:10,479 --> 03:25:15,319 getting any higher than they are that 4967 03:25:12,080 --> 03:25:15,319 were marginal. 4968 03:25:16,319 --> 03:25:21,520 Thanks for that and councelor FR. 4969 03:25:19,600 --> 03:25:23,279 » Yeah, well [clears throat] I remember 4970 03:25:21,520 --> 03:25:25,600 you mentioning that before the single 4971 03:25:23,279 --> 03:25:27,600 family home includes up to three units 4972 03:25:25,600 --> 03:25:29,600 and it does seem like a steal of a deal 4973 03:25:27,600 --> 03:25:32,479 in a lot of ways and it makes me think 4974 03:25:29,600 --> 03:25:34,720 maybe we really need to be looking at 4975 03:25:32,479 --> 03:25:36,720 the high density and are we discouraging 4976 03:25:34,720 --> 03:25:40,800 high density you know 700 square foot 4977 03:25:36,720 --> 03:25:42,239 units,000 square foot units um which I 4978 03:25:40,800 --> 03:25:44,479 think we really want for a lot of 4979 03:25:42,239 --> 03:25:45,920 reasons. One is the obvious need to 4980 03:25:44,479 --> 03:25:47,680 densify if we're not going to sprawl, 4981 03:25:45,920 --> 03:25:50,640 but otherwise 4982 03:25:47,680 --> 03:25:52,399 um the value to our community and 4983 03:25:50,640 --> 03:25:54,239 getting and using our infrastructure 4984 03:25:52,399 --> 03:25:57,600 more efficiently. Like there's a lot of 4985 03:25:54,239 --> 03:26:01,439 advantages to having um condominiums and 4986 03:25:57,600 --> 03:26:03,840 and rental apartments. And is this price 4987 03:26:01,439 --> 03:26:06,720 um is this price the right one to 4988 03:26:03,840 --> 03:26:09,600 incentivize that versus 4989 03:26:06,720 --> 03:26:11,600 um trying to do more single family lots 4990 03:26:09,600 --> 03:26:14,000 where you know if you get three units on 4991 03:26:11,600 --> 03:26:16,720 a lot it's it it does seem quite 4992 03:26:14,000 --> 03:26:18,160 affordable that way 4993 03:26:16,720 --> 03:26:20,880 » To the chair just to answer that 4994 03:26:18,160 --> 03:26:23,200 question. So it's not possible to do a 4995 03:26:20,880 --> 03:26:27,120 assist factor for a specific land use 4996 03:26:23,200 --> 03:26:29,840 category. uh so it has to be by DCC 4997 03:26:27,120 --> 03:26:32,080 program type uh transportation sewer 4998 03:26:29,840 --> 03:26:35,040 water drainage for example you can't say 4999 03:26:32,080 --> 03:26:37,359 we want to assist apartment um and then 5000 03:26:35,040 --> 03:26:39,520 when you go back to like why is the 5001 03:26:37,359 --> 03:26:42,479 apartment that way why does it come out 5002 03:26:39,520 --> 03:26:45,120 I mean it's a very um well somewhat of a 5003 03:26:42,479 --> 03:26:47,120 complicated model that you how you 5004 03:26:45,120 --> 03:26:49,359 calculate the dcc charges but you know 5005 03:26:47,120 --> 03:26:51,279 we're looking at you know the population 5006 03:26:49,359 --> 03:26:54,880 projections we're looking at per 5007 03:26:51,279 --> 03:26:56,960 household data um and So that's just 5008 03:26:54,880 --> 03:26:58,960 sort of how it computes out you know 5009 03:26:56,960 --> 03:27:02,560 based on the best practice approach to 5010 03:26:58,960 --> 03:27:05,840 calculating DCC's. So to tinker with the 5011 03:27:02,560 --> 03:27:09,040 apartment um one specifically like you'd 5012 03:27:05,840 --> 03:27:11,040 essentially be uh sort of tinkering with 5013 03:27:09,040 --> 03:27:13,439 like people per households or like 5014 03:27:11,040 --> 03:27:15,760 equivalency factors which are like 5015 03:27:13,439 --> 03:27:17,680 technically based engineering uh 5016 03:27:15,760 --> 03:27:20,160 requirements. So it's really difficult 5017 03:27:17,680 --> 03:27:21,600 to kind of look at that one land use 5018 03:27:20,160 --> 03:27:22,800 category and say I really wish that 5019 03:27:21,600 --> 03:27:24,640 would be lower. 5020 03:27:22,800 --> 03:27:27,120 » Okay. Thank you for that. Makes sense. 5021 03:27:24,640 --> 03:27:28,720 Um so in view in light of that I' I'd be 5022 03:27:27,120 --> 03:27:31,600 interested in having staff come back 5023 03:27:28,720 --> 03:27:33,200 with a little um a little more not 5024 03:27:31,600 --> 03:27:35,840 information actually just some option 5025 03:27:33,200 --> 03:27:39,040 around um some grace periods you know 5026 03:27:35,840 --> 03:27:42,239 maybe 3 months 6 months um and some 5027 03:27:39,040 --> 03:27:44,560 assist factor you know five and 10% and 5028 03:27:42,239 --> 03:27:46,080 I can put that into the form of a motion 5029 03:27:44,560 --> 03:27:48,080 if that's okay with you mayor. So, I'll 5030 03:27:46,080 --> 03:27:51,344 move that staff uh come back to council 5031 03:27:48,080 --> 03:27:53,439 with options for a grace period and for 5032 03:27:51,344 --> 03:27:56,720 [snorts] assist fact an assist factor 5033 03:27:53,439 --> 03:27:59,600 for the ACC bylaw. 5034 03:27:56,720 --> 03:28:01,680 » And Mr. Garbett need a little bit more 5035 03:27:59,600 --> 03:28:03,840 on what type of grace period and 5036 03:28:01,680 --> 03:28:06,239 timeline just if we can assist that 5037 03:28:03,840 --> 03:28:09,960 because uh we need to we need to be more 5038 03:28:06,239 --> 03:28:09,960 more specific there 5039 03:28:10,319 --> 03:28:15,359 » For phasing. 5040 03:28:12,399 --> 03:28:15,840 » Sure. Um, would you like me to restate a 5041 03:28:15,359 --> 03:28:16,720 motion? 5042 03:28:15,840 --> 03:28:17,200 » I think so. 5043 03:28:16,720 --> 03:28:18,854 » Okay. 5044 03:28:17,200 --> 03:28:19,600 » I know it's getting late and we're at 5045 03:28:18,854 --> 03:28:21,680 [clears throat] that point, but 5046 03:28:19,600 --> 03:28:24,800 » I'll do my best. I'll move that staff 5047 03:28:21,680 --> 03:28:28,960 come back to council with options for 5048 03:28:24,800 --> 03:28:32,720 phasing in the ACC bylaw for three and 5049 03:28:28,960 --> 03:28:35,359 six months and also for an assist factor 5050 03:28:32,720 --> 03:28:39,080 of five and 10% and well and one's 5051 03:28:35,359 --> 03:28:39,080 already provided. So, 5052 03:28:43,439 --> 03:28:50,239 Um, we don't have a secondary yet. 5053 03:28:48,080 --> 03:28:50,640 » Okay. And do you want to speak to it 5054 03:28:50,239 --> 03:28:52,479 further? 5055 03:28:50,640 --> 03:28:54,720 » Well, yeah. Just I'll just just to 5056 03:28:52,479 --> 03:28:56,239 clarify like I'm interested in the grace 5057 03:28:54,720 --> 03:28:58,640 period like if we if we do end up 5058 03:28:56,239 --> 03:29:00,399 passing this this uh winter, you know, 5059 03:28:58,640 --> 03:29:03,040 maybe we do push it off for a few months 5060 03:29:00,399 --> 03:29:06,239 just to give a bit more time. And then 5061 03:29:03,040 --> 03:29:08,960 um also the assist factor for a period 5062 03:29:06,239 --> 03:29:10,880 of time whether it's a year or two years 5063 03:29:08,960 --> 03:29:12,479 um to be reassessed later on. You know 5064 03:29:10,880 --> 03:29:14,960 maybe the market conditions change. 5065 03:29:12,479 --> 03:29:17,120 Maybe we find that uh it's not such a 5066 03:29:14,960 --> 03:29:19,040 big scary thing after all or maybe we 5067 03:29:17,120 --> 03:29:21,760 find everything's dropped off the map 5068 03:29:19,040 --> 03:29:23,359 and it's we need to reconsider how how 5069 03:29:21,760 --> 03:29:25,680 we're the projects [clears throat] we're 5070 03:29:23,359 --> 03:29:27,120 looking at basically I guess. And so 5071 03:29:25,680 --> 03:29:30,239 that's why I suggested the five and the 5072 03:29:27,120 --> 03:29:33,279 10%. [gasps] 5073 03:29:30,239 --> 03:29:34,880 Okay. Is that is that clear to anyone? 5074 03:29:33,279 --> 03:29:36,960 » Well, I think it's getting written up 5075 03:29:34,880 --> 03:29:39,200 right now and then 5076 03:29:36,960 --> 03:29:42,800 once it's up on the screen, you can just 5077 03:29:39,200 --> 03:29:46,120 confirm that that uh reflects 5078 03:29:42,800 --> 03:29:46,120 your intent. 5079 03:29:47,040 --> 03:29:51,840 » That's perfect. Um and after factors of 5080 03:29:49,680 --> 03:29:54,319 5 to 10% 5081 03:29:51,840 --> 03:29:57,680 or 5082 03:29:54,319 --> 03:29:58,960 say two years, I don't know. I guess we 5083 03:29:57,680 --> 03:30:01,760 can change that when it comes back to 5084 03:29:58,960 --> 03:30:04,399 see what those dollars look like. But 5085 03:30:01,760 --> 03:30:07,840 » And and it might be rather than dashes 5086 03:30:04,399 --> 03:30:09,920 the word and just because 5087 03:30:07,840 --> 03:30:10,479 that that that just kind of articulates 5088 03:30:09,920 --> 03:30:12,160 the 5089 03:30:10,479 --> 03:30:13,600 » Yeah, I just five and 10%. You're right. 5090 03:30:12,160 --> 03:30:15,120 It's we don't want we don't want 5091 03:30:13,600 --> 03:30:17,439 everything in between. Thanks. That's 5092 03:30:15,120 --> 03:30:20,479 perfect. Thank you. 5093 03:30:17,439 --> 03:30:22,640 » See? Yeah. Okay. Um and councelor 5094 03:30:20,479 --> 03:30:23,680 McCullum, um is this to the motion on 5095 03:30:22,640 --> 03:30:25,760 the floor now or? 5096 03:30:23,680 --> 03:30:28,640 » Yeah, it's just a clarifying question. 5097 03:30:25,760 --> 03:30:31,920 Um so if we provide this direction to 5098 03:30:28,640 --> 03:30:34,479 staff um I mean this is around the 5099 03:30:31,920 --> 03:30:37,359 implementation of the amenity cost 5100 03:30:34,479 --> 03:30:40,160 charge bylaw could we proceed with first 5101 03:30:37,359 --> 03:30:43,040 second and third reading and then um 5102 03:30:40,160 --> 03:30:45,279 this would inform adoption or um would 5103 03:30:43,040 --> 03:30:46,800 this have to delay the readings of the 5104 03:30:45,279 --> 03:30:51,920 bylaw as well? 5105 03:30:46,800 --> 03:30:54,160 » Mr. Con? Um, so it depends. Um, if the 5106 03:30:51,920 --> 03:30:55,840 intent or the belief is that the report 5107 03:30:54,160 --> 03:30:58,399 coming back would result in council's 5108 03:30:55,840 --> 03:30:59,760 desire to amend the bylaw, um, for 5109 03:30:58,399 --> 03:31:01,200 tonight, you I would recommend you 5110 03:30:59,760 --> 03:31:02,880 consider first and second. That way, 5111 03:31:01,200 --> 03:31:06,080 we're not considering the having to 5112 03:31:02,880 --> 03:31:09,520 resend third reading. At the same time, 5113 03:31:06,080 --> 03:31:11,040 um, having the bylaw split and now 5114 03:31:09,520 --> 03:31:14,960 potentially moving out of sync with the 5115 03:31:11,040 --> 03:31:18,720 DCC bylaw, that will also have kind of 5116 03:31:14,960 --> 03:31:20,880 some implications as well. So um yes, we 5117 03:31:18,720 --> 03:31:23,359 can def you can consider first and 5118 03:31:20,880 --> 03:31:25,680 second reading, provide the direction 5119 03:31:23,359 --> 03:31:28,239 based on this and then essentially I 5120 03:31:25,680 --> 03:31:29,760 wouldn't um bring the the bylaw back for 5121 03:31:28,239 --> 03:31:31,760 third reading consideration until we've 5122 03:31:29,760 --> 03:31:33,920 had a chance to undertake this work and 5123 03:31:31,760 --> 03:31:37,040 report back to council. And whether or 5124 03:31:33,920 --> 03:31:40,239 not the dcc bylaw comes back from the 5125 03:31:37,040 --> 03:31:42,479 province before then or not, it's the 5126 03:31:40,239 --> 03:31:44,560 timing may be off, which will impact our 5127 03:31:42,479 --> 03:31:46,479 current work because we're actually 5128 03:31:44,560 --> 03:31:48,319 preparing to implement some of these 5129 03:31:46,479 --> 03:31:50,160 fees and and get all of our ducks in a 5130 03:31:48,319 --> 03:31:52,239 row for when that time comes. So, we'll 5131 03:31:50,160 --> 03:31:54,080 just have to do some some tweaks on the 5132 03:31:52,239 --> 03:31:57,520 work plan as well. 5133 03:31:54,080 --> 03:31:58,800 » Okay. Thanks for that clarity. 5134 03:31:57,520 --> 03:32:02,000 » Right. Thanks for that that that 5135 03:31:58,800 --> 03:32:05,600 clarification. Um and councelor Mo. 5136 03:32:02,000 --> 03:32:08,239 Thanks, Mayor. Um, so just um reflecting 5137 03:32:05,600 --> 03:32:12,319 on what Miss Okonnell said earlier 5138 03:32:08,239 --> 03:32:16,080 around how um there, you know, there's a 5139 03:32:12,319 --> 03:32:17,680 domino effect with um the tax rates, 5140 03:32:16,080 --> 03:32:20,880 etc. 5141 03:32:17,680 --> 03:32:24,880 I'm not sure if um councelor Fr had 5142 03:32:20,880 --> 03:32:27,359 intended to have that as part of the 5143 03:32:24,880 --> 03:32:30,319 information that comes back. Um I mean 5144 03:32:27,359 --> 03:32:33,120 we've we've approved the the increase 5145 03:32:30,319 --> 03:32:35,840 for this year but 5146 03:32:33,120 --> 03:32:37,600 adjusting this would impact you know 5147 03:32:35,840 --> 03:32:40,239 future 5148 03:32:37,600 --> 03:32:42,880 tax rates. So I I don't know how full 5149 03:32:40,239 --> 03:32:46,319 wholesome of information 5150 03:32:42,880 --> 03:32:48,640 you're expecting like do we want to know 5151 03:32:46,319 --> 03:32:53,399 um how that's going to impact the the 5152 03:32:48,640 --> 03:32:53,399 numbers next year and beyond? 5153 03:32:53,760 --> 03:32:57,840 » And [clears throat] 5154 03:32:54,720 --> 03:33:00,080 uh Mr. department. 5155 03:32:57,840 --> 03:33:02,239 » The chair, we're we're having a a good 5156 03:33:00,080 --> 03:33:05,439 engaged discussion. I I had asked our 5157 03:33:02,239 --> 03:33:07,920 finance officer what the if we did not 5158 03:33:05,439 --> 03:33:10,000 proceed in in this current year, what 5159 03:33:07,920 --> 03:33:13,279 does that do for our taxation? 5160 03:33:10,000 --> 03:33:15,040 » Maybe ask Adam to recount the 5161 03:33:13,279 --> 03:33:17,439 conversation we had. 5162 03:33:15,040 --> 03:33:20,319 » Yeah. So if there is a delay in the 5163 03:33:17,439 --> 03:33:23,359 adoption of the ACC or DCC bylaw, there 5164 03:33:20,319 --> 03:33:25,680 will not be a direct impact on the 5165 03:33:23,359 --> 03:33:27,600 financial plan that council has been 5166 03:33:25,680 --> 03:33:30,000 presented with so far. What that 5167 03:33:27,600 --> 03:33:32,239 financial plan does not have though is 5168 03:33:30,000 --> 03:33:35,680 any of these projects in it. 5169 03:33:32,239 --> 03:33:39,200 Um, there are a handful of items that 5170 03:33:35,680 --> 03:33:42,239 would receive additional funding if the 5171 03:33:39,200 --> 03:33:45,359 ACC and DCC bylaws are adopted, which 5172 03:33:42,239 --> 03:33:50,239 would actually reduce the tax increases 5173 03:33:45,359 --> 03:33:52,720 required in the current year in 5174 03:33:50,239 --> 03:33:55,120 the financial plan is presented. So, 5175 03:33:52,720 --> 03:33:57,520 it's kind of a blend. 5176 03:33:55,120 --> 03:34:01,520 There's 5177 03:33:57,520 --> 03:34:03,760 not a big influence of DCC projects 5178 03:34:01,520 --> 03:34:07,520 because we I was working from an old DCC 5179 03:34:03,760 --> 03:34:09,200 bylaw, but there were projects that were 5180 03:34:07,520 --> 03:34:14,000 preceding and were included in the 5181 03:34:09,200 --> 03:34:17,200 financial plan that had not had DCC 5182 03:34:14,000 --> 03:34:22,520 money allocated to it yet. And I can't 5183 03:34:17,200 --> 03:34:22,520 allocate it until the new bylaws in. So, 5184 03:34:23,439 --> 03:34:31,840 » So it doesn't affect this year. 5185 03:34:26,960 --> 03:34:37,040 » It will not increase taxation for 2026. 5186 03:34:31,840 --> 03:34:39,359 It will not allow for decreases 5187 03:34:37,040 --> 03:34:41,680 in projects that are on the proposed 5188 03:34:39,359 --> 03:34:46,239 list. 5189 03:34:41,680 --> 03:34:49,279 » Okay. Thank you. But it will definitely 5190 03:34:46,239 --> 03:34:52,399 impact future years. 5191 03:34:49,279 --> 03:34:56,560 So that 14% or whatever is indicated for 5192 03:34:52,399 --> 03:35:00,399 2027 would be substantially higher for a 5193 03:34:56,560 --> 03:35:04,040 new council to have to figure out. 5194 03:35:00,399 --> 03:35:04,040 Sounds light. 5195 03:35:04,399 --> 03:35:12,560 The delay of this DCC or ACC will not 5196 03:35:08,080 --> 03:35:15,279 impact the 2027 tax change as I haven't 5197 03:35:12,560 --> 03:35:16,880 factored in the impacts from this 5198 03:35:15,279 --> 03:35:19,600 proposed. 5199 03:35:16,880 --> 03:35:21,439 Um, if all other things stay the same 5200 03:35:19,600 --> 03:35:24,399 for the financial plan next year and 5201 03:35:21,439 --> 03:35:26,640 this DCC bylaw comes in as presented, we 5202 03:35:24,399 --> 03:35:28,880 will see a decrease in taxation as there 5203 03:35:26,640 --> 03:35:33,520 is new funding sources eligible for 5204 03:35:28,880 --> 03:35:35,680 projects already in the financial plan. 5205 03:35:33,520 --> 03:35:38,000 » Right. Thanks for uh articulating that 5206 03:35:35,680 --> 03:35:39,840 and councelor. 5207 03:35:38,000 --> 03:35:42,479 » Yeah, thanks Mayor. Two points. First of 5208 03:35:39,840 --> 03:35:46,800 all, I wonder um if it would make sense 5209 03:35:42,479 --> 03:35:48,640 to uh add the word 5210 03:35:46,800 --> 03:35:51,200 and implications 5211 03:35:48,640 --> 03:35:54,200 um that the report back with options and 5212 03:35:51,200 --> 03:35:54,200 implications. 5213 03:35:54,239 --> 03:35:58,479 Um because I I'm assuming that the 5214 03:35:56,319 --> 03:36:00,960 report will do that anyway and that it 5215 03:35:58,479 --> 03:36:03,680 will if it gives us options, it'll also 5216 03:36:00,960 --> 03:36:05,040 let us know uh what the implications of 5217 03:36:03,680 --> 03:36:06,880 those options are. But I'm just 5218 03:36:05,040 --> 03:36:11,600 wondering if we should be clear about 5219 03:36:06,880 --> 03:36:13,680 giving that direction. Yeah. Um, 5220 03:36:11,600 --> 03:36:15,120 so that would be a friendly suggestion 5221 03:36:13,680 --> 03:36:18,399 or a friendly amendment. Then my 5222 03:36:15,120 --> 03:36:22,399 question procedurally is uh whether or 5223 03:36:18,399 --> 03:36:25,520 not it makes sense to defer the um the 5224 03:36:22,399 --> 03:36:30,239 motion the recommendation related to the 5225 03:36:25,520 --> 03:36:33,120 bylaw um to when that report comes back 5226 03:36:30,239 --> 03:36:36,399 you know if that would be procedurally a 5227 03:36:33,120 --> 03:36:37,600 a sensible way to to go or not. 5228 03:36:36,399 --> 03:36:39,600 Mr. 5229 03:36:37,600 --> 03:36:41,040 Um, 5230 03:36:39,600 --> 03:36:43,200 it it wouldn't actually make a 5231 03:36:41,040 --> 03:36:46,000 difference because it's an ACC bylaw. 5232 03:36:43,200 --> 03:36:48,560 You can do three readings at once. The 5233 03:36:46,000 --> 03:36:50,160 option to pursue or to consider first 5234 03:36:48,560 --> 03:36:52,960 and second at this point would be more 5235 03:36:50,160 --> 03:36:54,560 of a indication of council's intent to 5236 03:36:52,960 --> 03:36:57,840 continue to seriously consider the 5237 03:36:54,560 --> 03:37:00,960 application of the ACC's by delaying or 5238 03:36:57,840 --> 03:37:04,800 deferring the bylaw in its entirety. um 5239 03:37:00,960 --> 03:37:07,600 that is a different u approach but both 5240 03:37:04,800 --> 03:37:09,120 ultimately um as far as timeline for 5241 03:37:07,600 --> 03:37:10,880 consideration 5242 03:37:09,120 --> 03:37:13,680 it it's the same. 5243 03:37:10,880 --> 03:37:15,680 » Okay, thanks 5244 03:37:13,680 --> 03:37:17,920 and council last word. 5245 03:37:15,680 --> 03:37:19,359 » Yeah, sure. I'm happy to um move first 5246 03:37:17,920 --> 03:37:20,880 and second when it comes up and I'll 5247 03:37:19,359 --> 03:37:23,040 just hold off on third till we get this 5248 03:37:20,880 --> 03:37:25,279 information. And then I would I would 5249 03:37:23,040 --> 03:37:28,000 wonder if um just asking for the same 5250 03:37:25,279 --> 03:37:30,479 information on the DCC's um if it would 5251 03:37:28,000 --> 03:37:33,200 make sense to do it at the same time if 5252 03:37:30,479 --> 03:37:35,200 or maybe I should make a a subsequent 5253 03:37:33,200 --> 03:37:39,520 motion if we're interested in seeing 5254 03:37:35,200 --> 03:37:42,000 that same scenario laid out for that. 5255 03:37:39,520 --> 03:37:44,560 » Probably recommend waiting just it might 5256 03:37:42,000 --> 03:37:44,960 get severed anyway. So I I probably it's 5257 03:37:44,560 --> 03:37:46,560 a lot 5258 03:37:44,960 --> 03:37:48,560 » It would be a subsequent for sure but I 5259 03:37:46,560 --> 03:37:49,279 was I'm just throwing a little little 5260 03:37:48,560 --> 03:37:49,680 warning out. 5261 03:37:49,279 --> 03:37:51,840 » Yep. 5262 03:37:49,680 --> 03:37:53,840 » Okay, 5263 03:37:51,840 --> 03:37:56,319 » Fair enough. Uh so we do have a motion 5264 03:37:53,840 --> 03:37:57,760 on the floor. I don't see any further 5265 03:37:56,319 --> 03:37:59,840 questions or comments at this point in 5266 03:37:57,760 --> 03:38:01,680 time. All those in favor of the motion 5267 03:37:59,840 --> 03:38:05,640 on the screen 5268 03:38:01,680 --> 03:38:05,640 and motion carries. 5269 03:38:05,840 --> 03:38:10,479 Any subsequence before we move on? Okay. 5270 03:38:07,920 --> 03:38:12,640 Councelor FR I'd make the same motion 5271 03:38:10,479 --> 03:38:14,560 for the DCC bylaw. So we have the 5272 03:38:12,640 --> 03:38:16,560 information as soon as possible to 5273 03:38:14,560 --> 03:38:18,720 consider 5274 03:38:16,560 --> 03:38:21,200 and you know what I'm sure you would 5275 03:38:18,720 --> 03:38:22,800 come back with the uh implications of 5276 03:38:21,200 --> 03:38:25,760 how to move forward with that bylaw if 5277 03:38:22,800 --> 03:38:27,840 we wanted to make similar change or make 5278 03:38:25,760 --> 03:38:33,399 a change around the assist factor or the 5279 03:38:27,840 --> 03:38:33,399 um the implementation strategy on it. 5280 03:38:37,120 --> 03:38:40,640 I don't see a seconder for your motion. 5281 03:38:39,120 --> 03:38:42,080 So I don't believe that's going to move 5282 03:38:40,640 --> 03:38:45,080 forward. 5283 03:38:42,080 --> 03:38:45,080 Okay, 5284 03:38:47,600 --> 03:38:53,520 » I can read it if if that wakes you up. 5285 03:38:50,960 --> 03:38:55,680 » It's been seconded. Uh I do see Miss 5286 03:38:53,520 --> 03:38:57,200 Okonnell has her as well as Council 5287 03:38:55,680 --> 03:38:59,200 Mcllum. I'll go to Council McCullum 5288 03:38:57,200 --> 03:39:02,800 first. 5289 03:38:59,200 --> 03:39:06,399 » Uh thanks. I just uh want to say that I 5290 03:39:02,800 --> 03:39:09,760 am not in favor of um revisiting this. 5291 03:39:06,399 --> 03:39:12,960 Um I I think we've gotten far enough in 5292 03:39:09,760 --> 03:39:15,600 this process that this doesn't serve us 5293 03:39:12,960 --> 03:39:18,160 at this point in time and there has been 5294 03:39:15,600 --> 03:39:20,960 a fair amount of work both um with our 5295 03:39:18,160 --> 03:39:24,319 staff and other um and our municipal 5296 03:39:20,960 --> 03:39:26,399 partners to align this process and we've 5297 03:39:24,319 --> 03:39:28,000 passed third reading. It's gone to the 5298 03:39:26,399 --> 03:39:31,279 inspector of municipalities and this 5299 03:39:28,000 --> 03:39:33,200 will have a major impact on the cost of 5300 03:39:31,279 --> 03:39:34,880 property taxes for our residents if 5301 03:39:33,200 --> 03:39:37,520 we're going to wind this back. This is 5302 03:39:34,880 --> 03:39:39,840 work we have been asking for and 5303 03:39:37,520 --> 03:39:41,840 desperately needed to do 5 years ago and 5304 03:39:39,840 --> 03:39:43,920 I'm not in favor of slowing that down at 5305 03:39:41,840 --> 03:39:45,840 this point. So I'm not in favor of this 5306 03:39:43,920 --> 03:39:49,520 motion. 5307 03:39:45,840 --> 03:39:50,640 » Thanks Councelor Cullum and um Miss 5308 03:39:49,520 --> 03:39:53,760 Okonnell. 5309 03:39:50,640 --> 03:39:56,319 » Uh thank you to the mayor to council. Um 5310 03:39:53,760 --> 03:39:58,560 as council knows I'm currently the 5311 03:39:56,319 --> 03:40:00,960 acting director of Dolman services. We 5312 03:39:58,560 --> 03:40:04,160 are in active recruitment for the 5313 03:40:00,960 --> 03:40:06,160 replacement. Um part of me coming into 5314 03:40:04,160 --> 03:40:09,760 development services department over the 5315 03:40:06,160 --> 03:40:11,920 period of time was um very specifically 5316 03:40:09,760 --> 03:40:14,880 to work on internal systems in order to 5317 03:40:11,920 --> 03:40:18,000 improve service provision and service 5318 03:40:14,880 --> 03:40:21,920 level specifically looking at the KPIs 5319 03:40:18,000 --> 03:40:25,040 the systems um and the structure itself. 5320 03:40:21,920 --> 03:40:27,680 I will say that undertaking this work I 5321 03:40:25,040 --> 03:40:30,239 it will have a capacity impact on that 5322 03:40:27,680 --> 03:40:31,920 and I do have a finite timeline for the 5323 03:40:30,239 --> 03:40:33,920 amount of time I can be in development 5324 03:40:31,920 --> 03:40:36,960 services is with the election coming up 5325 03:40:33,920 --> 03:40:39,120 in the fall. Um it was not my intent to 5326 03:40:36,960 --> 03:40:42,239 stay in this position longer term than 5327 03:40:39,120 --> 03:40:44,479 that. So, in the event of um we can come 5328 03:40:42,239 --> 03:40:47,040 back with this information, but I I do 5329 03:40:44,479 --> 03:40:50,720 want you to know it's not likely not 5330 03:40:47,040 --> 03:40:53,120 feasible to do both in tandem without 5331 03:40:50,720 --> 03:40:56,239 one impacting the service processes 5332 03:40:53,120 --> 03:40:58,560 internally. I just don't have the staff 5333 03:40:56,239 --> 03:41:01,040 that are able to help and support and 5334 03:40:58,560 --> 03:41:03,200 manage a project like that. Um, as you 5335 03:41:01,040 --> 03:41:05,600 know, we're currently working on the OCP 5336 03:41:03,200 --> 03:41:08,239 update. We're working on repeal and 5337 03:41:05,600 --> 03:41:09,520 replacing the zoning bylaw. Um there's a 5338 03:41:08,239 --> 03:41:12,960 lot of work going on in the building 5339 03:41:09,520 --> 03:41:16,160 services division. Um it we are 5340 03:41:12,960 --> 03:41:18,160 challenged to resource this. So it will 5341 03:41:16,160 --> 03:41:20,880 be a bit of a trade-off for council to 5342 03:41:18,160 --> 03:41:23,279 determine where those resources need to 5343 03:41:20,880 --> 03:41:26,399 be allocated at the staff level. 5344 03:41:23,279 --> 03:41:27,920 Alternatively, if council would like to 5345 03:41:26,399 --> 03:41:29,760 um I could bring back some cost 5346 03:41:27,920 --> 03:41:31,279 estimates to completely outsource this 5347 03:41:29,760 --> 03:41:33,200 work and then council can make the 5348 03:41:31,279 --> 03:41:34,720 decision as to whether or not you want 5349 03:41:33,200 --> 03:41:36,880 to fund the service improvements through 5350 03:41:34,720 --> 03:41:38,399 third parties or if you would like to 5351 03:41:36,880 --> 03:41:40,000 increase the budget or the resources 5352 03:41:38,399 --> 03:41:41,600 available to development services to 5353 03:41:40,000 --> 03:41:45,120 undertake this work that is not part of 5354 03:41:41,600 --> 03:41:48,399 the work plan. Um so I I just I just 5355 03:41:45,120 --> 03:41:50,319 kind of eyes wide open. um every action 5356 03:41:48,399 --> 03:41:53,120 there's a reaction including on a 5357 03:41:50,319 --> 03:41:55,120 department that currently in its current 5358 03:41:53,120 --> 03:41:56,960 state 5359 03:41:55,120 --> 03:42:00,080 » Right thanks for that and Mr. regard it. 5360 03:41:56,960 --> 03:42:02,239 » Yeah. Thanks. Uh um I I want to be I 5361 03:42:00,080 --> 03:42:04,239 want to be I want to clearly acknowledge 5362 03:42:02,239 --> 03:42:06,880 that this is in response to feedback 5363 03:42:04,239 --> 03:42:08,399 that you've received. We had a process. 5364 03:42:06,880 --> 03:42:11,760 Um 5365 03:42:08,399 --> 03:42:14,880 I think getting information directly on 5366 03:42:11,760 --> 03:42:17,040 what what the implications are is is we 5367 03:42:14,880 --> 03:42:19,120 can do that and then council needs to 5368 03:42:17,040 --> 03:42:22,800 ultimately decide what they want to do. 5369 03:42:19,120 --> 03:42:24,319 Uh Ms. Okonnell uh spoke to this. We've 5370 03:42:22,800 --> 03:42:27,840 been working at this at council's 5371 03:42:24,319 --> 03:42:31,439 direction uh stretching back to the 2018 5372 03:42:27,840 --> 03:42:33,520 um uh council. Uh this was all intended 5373 03:42:31,439 --> 03:42:35,680 work to go. We were impacted by COVID. 5374 03:42:33,520 --> 03:42:38,640 So we're now 5375 03:42:35,680 --> 03:42:40,640 two terms past the conversation. Uh and 5376 03:42:38,640 --> 03:42:43,760 I only offer I don't offer that as as 5377 03:42:40,640 --> 03:42:45,600 any kind of a sort of ultimatum type of 5378 03:42:43,760 --> 03:42:47,279 thing. And I I know that how that will 5379 03:42:45,600 --> 03:42:48,560 sound. Council just needs to determine 5380 03:42:47,279 --> 03:42:50,479 if they want to proceed or not. And it 5381 03:42:48,560 --> 03:42:53,760 may not may not be the right time. uh 5382 03:42:50,479 --> 03:42:55,680 and and we we serve there. Um we do know 5383 03:42:53,760 --> 03:42:57,279 that there's been a call to update these 5384 03:42:55,680 --> 03:42:59,200 things because there are implications 5385 03:42:57,279 --> 03:43:00,479 for uh the development committee and 5386 03:42:59,200 --> 03:43:02,640 then we have the development committee 5387 03:43:00,479 --> 03:43:04,560 identifying that these costs in light of 5388 03:43:02,640 --> 03:43:06,239 the current conditions have impacts and 5389 03:43:04,560 --> 03:43:07,760 so ultimately council will determine 5390 03:43:06,239 --> 03:43:11,680 they want to proceed or not. There's no 5391 03:43:07,760 --> 03:43:13,840 obligation to do this. Uh it doesn't 5392 03:43:11,680 --> 03:43:15,199 matter how much uh time and effort or 5393 03:43:13,840 --> 03:43:16,800 direction or whatever. We have to do 5394 03:43:15,199 --> 03:43:19,600 what council would like to see. So I 5395 03:43:16,800 --> 03:43:22,080 just I offer that it's a real factor and 5396 03:43:19,600 --> 03:43:24,880 we are coming to the close of the second 5397 03:43:22,080 --> 03:43:27,040 term who wanted to work on this and so 5398 03:43:24,880 --> 03:43:29,120 you know we will come back these are 5399 03:43:27,040 --> 03:43:30,560 these are number these are number 5400 03:43:29,120 --> 03:43:31,840 factors there's tables that go along 5401 03:43:30,560 --> 03:43:33,840 with that and then council does have to 5402 03:43:31,840 --> 03:43:35,520 be take a serious look at what uh what 5403 03:43:33,840 --> 03:43:37,040 they want to do given all of their 5404 03:43:35,520 --> 03:43:39,840 priorities between now and the end of 5405 03:43:37,040 --> 03:43:41,760 the term in 2026. So just just offer 5406 03:43:39,840 --> 03:43:45,680 that and there's been good input uh 5407 03:43:41,760 --> 03:43:46,960 received by by many parties um and uh 5408 03:43:45,680 --> 03:43:48,960 and ultimately it's a decision the 5409 03:43:46,960 --> 03:43:50,640 council needs to take forward. So thank 5410 03:43:48,960 --> 03:43:52,960 you. 5411 03:43:50,640 --> 03:43:54,560 » Thanks Mr. Garvet and uh councelor 5412 03:43:52,960 --> 03:43:56,000 Fresh. Uh last word again. 5413 03:43:54,560 --> 03:43:59,439 » Okay. Thank you. Well well thanks to 5414 03:43:56,000 --> 03:44:02,080 staff for the the input about um what 5415 03:43:59,439 --> 03:44:04,160 it's going to take to get these numbers. 5416 03:44:02,080 --> 03:44:05,600 Um 5417 03:44:04,160 --> 03:44:07,520 yeah I'm just looking I'm just looking 5418 03:44:05,600 --> 03:44:09,840 at the two requests. So, one's about 5419 03:44:07,520 --> 03:44:11,439 phasing the implementation. 5420 03:44:09,840 --> 03:44:13,920 I would assume that means changing the 5421 03:44:11,439 --> 03:44:15,840 date and then the other one's the five 5422 03:44:13,920 --> 03:44:18,239 and 10%. 5423 03:44:15,840 --> 03:44:21,040 Um, and I guess the implications of that 5424 03:44:18,239 --> 03:44:24,160 is that we won't be collecting 5 to 10% 5425 03:44:21,040 --> 03:44:26,160 of the DCC's 5426 03:44:24,160 --> 03:44:28,265 for two years and up to two years. And 5427 03:44:26,160 --> 03:44:29,199 that's going to have an effect on our 5428 03:44:28,265 --> 03:44:31,520 [clears throat] funding for certain 5429 03:44:29,199 --> 03:44:33,520 projects and obviously taxation 5430 03:44:31,520 --> 03:44:36,160 implications. 5431 03:44:33,520 --> 03:44:39,439 Um, but I'm also guessing these aren't 5432 03:44:36,160 --> 03:44:42,319 massive numbers. So, um, I mean, I'd 5433 03:44:39,439 --> 03:44:44,080 like to get it right. 5434 03:44:42,319 --> 03:44:46,000 So, I'm going to support the motion. 5435 03:44:44,080 --> 03:44:48,880 Thanks. 5436 03:44:46,000 --> 03:44:49,760 » All right. Uh, Council McCullum, last 5437 03:44:48,880 --> 03:44:52,720 word. 5438 03:44:49,760 --> 03:44:54,720 » Um, can staff clarify if we were to make 5439 03:44:52,720 --> 03:44:56,720 this change whether or not the DCC's 5440 03:44:54,720 --> 03:44:58,479 would have to go a second time back to 5441 03:44:56,720 --> 03:45:00,479 the inspector of municipalities because 5442 03:44:58,479 --> 03:45:03,040 that seems to be a point of confusion 5443 03:45:00,479 --> 03:45:06,160 here. 5444 03:45:03,040 --> 03:45:09,199 through the chair. Um the inspectors had 5445 03:45:06,160 --> 03:45:11,040 the blaw for about four weeks. I'm going 5446 03:45:09,199 --> 03:45:12,640 to say three or four weeks. Uh their 5447 03:45:11,040 --> 03:45:14,800 turnaround time right now is two to 5448 03:45:12,640 --> 03:45:16,479 three months. Um so there's a couple 5449 03:45:14,800 --> 03:45:18,960 different options like we could ask them 5450 03:45:16,479 --> 03:45:22,319 to pause the review until we get this 5451 03:45:18,960 --> 03:45:23,840 report to council. Um we could let them 5452 03:45:22,319 --> 03:45:26,479 know that this is what you're 5453 03:45:23,840 --> 03:45:28,720 considering. Um, if council, if the 5454 03:45:26,479 --> 03:45:31,359 inspector did sign the bylaw in the 5455 03:45:28,720 --> 03:45:34,160 meantime, uh, we would have to bring the 5456 03:45:31,359 --> 03:45:36,640 new bylaw back through the ministry and 5457 03:45:34,160 --> 03:45:38,800 the inspector would have to resign. I 5458 03:45:36,640 --> 03:45:41,279 don't expect that would take as much 5459 03:45:38,800 --> 03:45:43,199 time as a complete review would because 5460 03:45:41,279 --> 03:45:44,880 especially when you're like decreasing 5461 03:45:43,199 --> 03:45:47,199 and using an assist factor, which is 5462 03:45:44,880 --> 03:45:48,880 council's tool, but it may be it's just 5463 03:45:47,199 --> 03:45:51,040 a little bit more of an administrative 5464 03:45:48,880 --> 03:45:53,120 cost and sort of a bit of a hiccup that 5465 03:45:51,040 --> 03:45:54,800 we need to manage. Uh, so the answer is 5466 03:45:53,120 --> 03:45:57,520 if they sign the bylaw and it arrives 5467 03:45:54,800 --> 03:46:00,080 tomorrow, it has to go back. Um, we will 5468 03:45:57,520 --> 03:46:01,760 need another signature. 5469 03:46:00,080 --> 03:46:03,199 » Okay. All right. Thanks for that 5470 03:46:01,760 --> 03:46:04,319 clarification. I don't see any other 5471 03:46:03,199 --> 03:46:07,040 lights, so I'm going to ask the question 5472 03:46:04,319 --> 03:46:09,359 right now. Um, all those in favor of the 5473 03:46:07,040 --> 03:46:11,520 motion on the floor. 5474 03:46:09,359 --> 03:46:15,040 Any opposed? 5475 03:46:11,520 --> 03:46:16,800 And motion uh, fails. 5476 03:46:15,040 --> 03:46:18,880 Uh, 5477 03:46:16,800 --> 03:46:20,560 uh, thanks for the lengthy conversation 5478 03:46:18,880 --> 03:46:23,279 on that. I know I know it's much later 5479 03:46:20,560 --> 03:46:26,399 than I think I anticipated possibly some 5480 03:46:23,279 --> 03:46:27,760 others as well. We have one last item uh 5481 03:46:26,399 --> 03:46:30,160 before we can break and that's the 5482 03:46:27,760 --> 03:46:33,160 development procedure bylaw. third. 5483 03:46:30,160 --> 03:46:33,160 » Yeah. 5484 03:46:42,399 --> 03:46:47,080 » Yeah. Are they giving you 5485 03:46:59,199 --> 03:47:05,080 Uh I'll I'll move that. Um 5486 03:47:05,120 --> 03:47:10,800 I'm just making sure that I am not 5487 03:47:07,359 --> 03:47:12,880 missing anything here. Um I think the 5488 03:47:10,800 --> 03:47:16,080 only change. Okay. So I'll move the 5489 03:47:12,880 --> 03:47:18,000 recommended motion. Um with the the 5490 03:47:16,080 --> 03:47:21,359 change being that council give first and 5491 03:47:18,000 --> 03:47:26,160 second reading to the amenity cost bar 5492 03:47:21,359 --> 03:47:28,160 cost charges bylaw 3207 as amended. 5493 03:47:26,160 --> 03:47:30,880 » Okay. So that's been moved and seconded. 5494 03:47:28,160 --> 03:47:34,160 It's just first and second reading only. 5495 03:47:30,880 --> 03:47:37,040 Um all those [clears throat] in favor? 5496 03:47:34,160 --> 03:47:38,720 Any opposed? And motion carries. Sorry 5497 03:47:37,040 --> 03:47:40,560 for jumping the gun on that one. And Mr. 5498 03:47:38,720 --> 03:47:43,560 regard. 5499 03:47:40,560 --> 03:47:43,560 » Uh 5500 03:47:45,040 --> 03:47:52,960 so uh giving person second and then we 5501 03:47:49,680 --> 03:47:55,520 would have it back for third reading at 5502 03:47:52,960 --> 03:47:58,399 the with the report 5503 03:47:55,520 --> 03:48:01,199 about amenities because that resolution 5504 03:47:58,399 --> 03:48:03,840 passed. Thank you. Just want to make 5505 03:48:01,199 --> 03:48:05,120 sure we're on the same page. Yeah. And 5506 03:48:03,840 --> 03:48:07,600 what I had heard is that we could do 5507 03:48:05,120 --> 03:48:09,600 this for first and second or do first, 5508 03:48:07,600 --> 03:48:11,760 second, and third because it's an ACC. 5509 03:48:09,600 --> 03:48:14,760 So that's why I was less concerned about 5510 03:48:11,760 --> 03:48:14,760 that. 5511 03:48:18,399 --> 03:48:22,800 » Yeah. 5512 03:48:21,199 --> 03:48:25,199 » If there were changes though, we we 5513 03:48:22,800 --> 03:48:26,960 couldn't. My understanding is that you 5514 03:48:25,199 --> 03:48:29,040 said that. 5515 03:48:26,960 --> 03:48:30,319 » Yeah. Yeah. 5516 03:48:29,040 --> 03:48:32,880 » But first, second, and third could 5517 03:48:30,319 --> 03:48:34,239 happen in the future is what I said. It 5518 03:48:32,880 --> 03:48:35,760 didn't first and second didn't have to 5519 03:48:34,239 --> 03:48:39,120 happen tonight as far as I understood 5520 03:48:35,760 --> 03:48:41,439 but maybe I but it yeah I think we can 5521 03:48:39,120 --> 03:48:42,479 move on Miss Okonnell though you look 5522 03:48:41,439 --> 03:48:44,399 like 5523 03:48:42,479 --> 03:48:45,840 » Um no I just want to clarify so the 5524 03:48:44,399 --> 03:48:47,520 motion that was passed has to do with 5525 03:48:45,840 --> 03:48:51,199 the DCC's 5526 03:48:47,520 --> 03:48:53,279 » The or before that the one typed um no 5527 03:48:51,199 --> 03:48:54,479 it said DCC's the one that was shown 5528 03:48:53,279 --> 03:48:55,680 » That failed 5529 03:48:54,479 --> 03:48:57,760 » That failed and then there was one 5530 03:48:55,680 --> 03:48:59,760 before about the ACC's which is the 5531 03:48:57,760 --> 03:49:02,640 referral and that passed and now you've 5532 03:48:59,760 --> 03:49:04,080 done first and second Okay. And then 5533 03:49:02,640 --> 03:49:06,239 you're still because that motion as 5534 03:49:04,080 --> 03:49:09,479 recommended included the twinning with 5535 03:49:06,239 --> 03:49:09,479 the DCC's, 5536 03:49:09,600 --> 03:49:13,359 right? Because the only change that was 5537 03:49:10,960 --> 03:49:16,600 made was the number of reasons like the 5538 03:49:13,359 --> 03:49:16,600 number of readings. 5539 03:49:16,720 --> 03:49:20,239 It'll depend on the timing and what 5540 03:49:18,319 --> 03:49:21,439 council decides to do and where we are 5541 03:49:20,239 --> 03:49:23,199 in that. 5542 03:49:21,439 --> 03:49:24,720 » So we don't have to take it out then. 5543 03:49:23,199 --> 03:49:27,199 » No, no, you can just leave it for now. 5544 03:49:24,720 --> 03:49:29,920 Yeah. But just just to clarify so 5545 03:49:27,199 --> 03:49:32,399 resolution 11.11 5546 03:49:29,920 --> 03:49:34,239 had the second thing which the desire 5547 03:49:32,399 --> 03:49:36,960 which is in the interest of everybody's 5548 03:49:34,239 --> 03:49:38,960 calculations to twin whatever happens 5549 03:49:36,960 --> 03:49:42,000 with ACC and whatever happens with the 5550 03:49:38,960 --> 03:49:44,160 DCC to have the timing coincidental. 5551 03:49:42,000 --> 03:49:47,600 Okay. Thanks. Thank you. 5552 03:49:44,160 --> 03:49:49,439 » All right. Much appreciated. On to uh 5553 03:49:47,600 --> 03:49:52,720 the last item development procedure 5554 03:49:49,439 --> 03:49:55,279 bylaw 320. 5555 03:49:52,720 --> 03:49:58,720 Any questions or comments? Uh it's just 5556 03:49:55,279 --> 03:50:02,399 housekeeping. All those in favor and any 5557 03:49:58,720 --> 03:50:05,840 opposed and motion carries. Uh and we 5558 03:50:02,399 --> 03:50:09,279 have our encampment resolution. 5559 03:50:05,840 --> 03:50:12,720 Uh is everyone okay if I count cancel or 5560 03:50:09,279 --> 03:50:14,880 skip the uh council reports? 5561 03:50:12,720 --> 03:50:18,399 » All right. So we have a first and second 5562 03:50:14,880 --> 03:50:20,640 for in camera. All those in favor? Any 5563 03:50:18,399 --> 03:50:23,640 opposed? Motion carries and we are 5564 03:50:20,640 --> 03:50:23,640 adjourned. 5565 03:50:26,160 --> 03:50:28,800 All right.