I will now call the August 12, 2026 Committee Adjustment
Hearing to Order. As a reminder, this hearing is being
held as a hybrid meeting with members of committee participating
in person and remotely. Indician, the meeting is being streamed
live on the Town's website for those attending today's hearing
in person electronic devices, which emit a sound should be
turned off or otherwise that the vibrator silent, please. All
remarks and questions are to be directed to the chair.
This will enable the hearing to be conducted in an
organised manner. I will now conduct Committe Committee attendance. Call
your name. Please use your mic. To. That was online.
Memorable. Remember to Carlo. Member French. Present. Member Coney. Present.
Member Sodi. President. I'm also president from member Van Boulgen
since his regrets and will not be attending today's meeting.
I would like to begin by taking a moment to
acknowledge the land on which we gather, indigenous peoples, have
unique and enduring relationships with the land, indigenous peoples have
lived on and cared for this land throughout the ages.
We acknowledge this and we recognise the significance of the
land on which we gather and call home. We acknowledge
the traditional territory of the heroine Wendat, Han the Nashani's
Peoples, and the Unash Navik of the William Streeties. This
land is part of the treaty and territory of the
Mississaugas of the Credit First Nations. We honour and respect
indigenous heritage and the long - lasting history of the
land and strive to protect the land. Water, plants, and
animals that have happened to this land for generations yet
to come. In today's hearing, are there any members of
committee who wish to disclose any pecuniar interests. C9. Any
corrections to the minutes. Previous meeting. None. Can I get
a mover. And a seconder for July 15th, 2026. Also
moved the minutes. Member of French, secondary, please. Member Coney,
thank you. Call a vote, member bull. In favor. Remember
to Carlo. Member French. In favor. Member Coney. In favor.
Member Sodi. In favor. I'm also a faveur for the
record of the motion has carried. And passed. Are there
any new requests by an agent or an applicant to
defer or withdraw an application listed agenda. Is C9?
Yep. Go ahead. Lalit Kumar. Yes, hire. Everyone follow. Yep.
Go ahead. Yeah, I want to just know like you
guys just, everybody's in the favor, just all people's like
favourite, favourite, favourite. So I want to know, can I
you repeat that question again for me. Oh, the question,
yeah. If there's any agent or applicant, so if you're
an applicant, do what you like to defer or withdraw
an application listed on today's agenda. If you want to
go continue with the hearing, then you don't have to
say anything. Okay, perfect. Are you good? Yes. Okay. Thank
you so much. Uh, we are moving on to regular
business. Minor variant applications. Application A4 - 26 located at
27 Cranston Drive with the Applicant or Agent. Please introduce
yourself and present any new information. Lalik Kumar, that's you.
Yeah, it's me. Do you have anything new that you
didn't put in the application that we adhere today or
is everything that you put? Yeah. It's actually by far
the driveway measurement, right? Yeah. It's under 26 - 7
Cranston Drive in the front of that. So there's a
specific space for that because I'm the cousin of the
person who owns this house. So I'm attending this meeting
behalf of him. Okay. So he's in right now in
the back home, right? Okay. Yeah. So there's a measurement.
So it's all most like we need relaxation of some
like inches, maybe in a feed, like less than feet.
For the driveway. We have a two drivers in the
front of our house. That's why they complete for us.
Okay. But there's nothing new on the application that we
need to know about, right? Yes. Okay. Thank you so
much. Uh, town planner or designate introduce yourself in presenting
new information. Through the chair, Sabrina's material, planning technician. I
have no new information. Thank you so much. Committee's members.
Do you have any questions or comments on the application.
Member France. Through you, Chair. I have two concerns. Uh,
the first one is that there is no sign posted.
So I'd just like clarification that there was one, but
there was no sign when I drove past. And the
second I know that the plan already noted this, but
the job's been done. Like the work's all complete. So
that's of a concern to me. Like why are we
here? Like why are they coming now. So. Thank you
very much. Thank you member French. Um, any other question
member? So the two variants requested. One is for the
second driveway, which apparently has already been constructed. But the
driveway width, that, does that apply to the driveway in
front of the garage. Through the chair, yes. So it's
both driveways combined the measurement. Okay. So when was that
driveway in front of the garage built. Through the chair?
The original driveway. Yes. The original driveway that's too wide.
Right. It's only supposed to be 10 metres and it's
14. 28 metres. Through the chair, um, measurement for both.
So the driveway in front of the garage and the
new access combined is 14 metres. So the driveway in
front of the garage complies, but the new access, the
new driveway that added to the existing, uh, brings it
over. The permitted, um, maximum. So the driveway width doesn't
apply to one driveway. It applies to both of them
combined? Correct. That's the way the bylaws worded. Yep. All
right. Thank you member. Boy member DeCarlo. Uh, member bull,
just answer my question. Got it. Okay. Thank you. Any
of the questions or comments for committee members. Member Coney.
Through the chair to the applicant, uh, just wondering why
you want to put a driveway right across the front
of your house. What are your plans for this entrance.
To the applicant, the questions towards you. Kansiya's name. Let
me. Mr. Kumar. Yes, I'm here. So, um, my cousin
is with me too. Can I ask him the question
about this too. Uh, yeah. Go ahead. And back
there. You made it to the way they considered 3D
HSPs. But they were very solid. Sorry, excuse me. Excuse
me. You're going to have to put your miter muke
when you're ready to answer. Just, just raise your hand
or just, uh, just say you're ready to speak. But
you got to put your microphone on mute. No, no.
That's a. Gentleman. He's a way of. It's just not
very clear. If you could speak, um, slow. Or louder.
Okay. Can you speak slower and louder. Yes, sure. I
will speak soil louder. So what my cousin said. So
the space on the one outside of our house. And
one is whether the look of lover house. If we
didn't make a, like the other second driveway, it looks
not nice too. And we have a backside of the
pool too. And we did not even touch any tree
over there in the drivers near that too. That's why
we made this too. So I'm in the front of
the even dislocation. Like I'm sitting on the front of
the house right now. If anybody's want to see the
live video on it, I can show you guys. Okay.
Okay. Thank you, member Coney. So can you tell me
what is the purpose of it? I didn't understand. I'm
sorry. Can you repeat what is the purpose of the
driveway. Yeah. So it's just because of the space to
going back and through the to the pool. Right? So
the driveway is there to have access to the pool.
Yes. And the one side is the garage. And sorry.
One side is the garage. One side is the way
to the pool. So you're going to have vehicles driving
back to the pool. Is that what you mean? It
says that it's going to be, uh, proposed hardscape beside
the house. No, we don't drive back to the pool.
Okay. And just for, just for public records, can you
give us the name of the other person that was
speaking. So with me right now? The other gentleman, your
cousin. So he's in the back home. The owner of
this building. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Memorable.
Yes. I do have a question for the applicant. So
on the side of the proposed driveway, the existing proposed
driveway. You have hard scape. Um, what is that hardscape,
sorry, is it there or is it proposed? And what's
the purpose of it. Deer this way to the pool
just to be look nice. Like if it's the grass
over there, maybe with the like the rain, it will
be wet. Like we can't walk on the breast that
way. And, and you said, um, maybe I didn't understand
that the driveway was on, you need the second driveway
for access to the pool. Yes, right. I don't understand
that because you can access the pool through the house
or through the garage or on the side, other side
of the house. You don't need a driveway toxis. The
pool. Can you explain that, please? Yeah. Actually, we renovate
all the house. So what we plan like we have
a space on the side of the house. That's why
we made this. It's not on this way. It is
in the plan 2, right? Right. So it's on the
screen. Yes. So just to tell, sorry memorable to town
staff, just a couple concerns that are coming up with
me is, uh, the concerned with the AWSC. They always
thought that they're in front of. And then also. The
tree protection zone. They took some trees down. And then
it's saying from Townstaff report that you guys, they're responsible
for utility permits and everything because they're so close to
proximity to the area. So the question is from Town
staff is, is it more important that they get these
things in line before they come to the table here.
Through the chair, um, transportation had no further concerns regarding
the stop sign. They just wanted to ensure that the
residents were aware that the stop line cannot be blocked.
Um, it needs to remain visible for oncoming traffic. And
will not be removed in the future. Uh, so the
residents have been afforded this. Regarding the tree removal, um,
our municipal law enforcement has completed investigation. And they determined
that the trees were removed prior to the implementation of
the tree bylaw. And therefore, no further action can be
taken. Um, which landscape has no further concerns. Um, so
repeat that they're, they're in the middle of dealing with
the infraction of taking those movement, those trees. Just. The
entire. The investigation has
already been completed and they determined no further action can
be taken. No further acts. Okay. Memorable. Sorry. What I
read in the landscape comments and correct me if I'm
wrong that they did construction within the tree protection zone
and may have damaged a red oak tree. That's what
I was reading. And so, uh, they, and I think
it's, they should be responsible of that tree. Is damaged
if it looks like there's damage after they've constructed. Um,
so what's, you know, you say the further action. But
if they've damaged a tree because they built without a
permit or a tree protection zone, how do you use,
let's say they should be planting another tree because they've
damaged a tree. How do we enforce that? Where's the
consequence. It sounds like there was enforcement. Was there enforcement.
Through the chair there was enforcement in terms of looking
into it? Um, and going through that route. Because it
was done prior to the bylaw, there aren't necessarily consequences
that could be taken afterwards with respect to this application.
So if they can replant a tree, that would be
nice of them to do. However, it's not a requirement
from an enforcement perspective and enforcement was handled. This matter
is unrelated to the minor variants application though. So I
would just like to flag that. No, but if we
want, if we were concerned about the tree, we could
make them plant a new tree as a condition of
this variant that this committee decided to grant it. I
don't know. And do you know, is the red oak
tree damaged? Is it a live dead? Do we know.
Through the chair, I'm not entirely sure. I believe, um,
landscape may have mentioned it was, it was removed. Um,
but no further action can be taken. Landscape doesn't have
an issue with. Me. Member Corni through the Chair to
staff. So, so these people, they did the construction before
they asked for a permit. They took the tree down
when they shouldn't have. And the consequences for doing this.
Is that correct? So the chair that is correct. Thank
you. Move on. Uh, no. Member DeCarlo. Yeah, just start
a couple of questions here. Um, so I'm just looking
at the site plan in terms of its accuracy to
today's construction. And I'm wondering if, if the accuracy is
correct. So this driveway that you're proposing is what is
what's built today. It's exactly as built. This 14 foot
four inches wide. That's to the planner. City planner. Through
the chair, um, what seems to have been built today
is the, um, the proposed driveway, um, at 4. 37
metres. Okay. And this was verified by you or just
the client or I'm sorry, the homeowner. How was this
dimetrium given to you? Uh, through the chair, this dimension
was provided on the site plan. Okay. And that's what
they went in for exactly that dimension. That's correct. Um.
So also looking through the plan and I'm looking at
the area where you're saying existing hardscape at the back
of the building. It seems that there's a structure that's
been built there and the pool. Is this new construction
that's occurred? And this question is to the, uh, homeowner.
The leap. Yes. I'm here. Yeah. So is the pool
there now or, or not? Oh, it's the pool is
there now. Okay. And you've also built a covered patio
or a covered. No, we didn't cover papillou. Sorry. We
did a covered pet to you. Okay. Did you acquire
a permit for that as well. Uh, yes. So you
had a permit for that. We, we have a permit.
We, we applied the pyramid. Okay. So you have a
permit. So the only thing that you did outside of
your perno is construct this driveway. And I'm assuming you
used the dry way to construct everything at the back.
That's probably what where this driver came to light. Am
I correct? Yes. Okay. So you're going to reinstate the
pool. You're going to have this cabana. You're going to
have this driver. Okay. So this dimension, you're very confident
that 4. 37 metres is the actual width that you're
proposing. Yes. It's a so it may the Arctic strand
the designer. Right. So the 40. 7. You mean. Okay,
fair enough. That's all the questions I have. Thank you.
Kate, thank you. Uh, any members are committee members. Sorry.
I have any comments, questions. C9. Secretary Church, does anyone
register to delegate to this application? Sir, the chair town
has received two request members of the public to speak
to the application. I have the first one, Mr. Joseph
Repe.
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. And everyone on a committee.
Some of the stuff I could not understand what was
going on actually. So I will give you my version.
Where I think what happened in the last year, up
to date. So, um, my name is Joseph Repick, owner
of the 25 Cranston Drive. Now, before we begin, I
just want to make sure that this blueprint is officially
been stamped by the city of Caladin. As to build
to that specification, wherever it's on that print. Sorry. Can
you repeat that, the blueprint? Okay. Before we begin, this
side plan should have been, I believe, approved last year
or three months ago or six months ago. To give
it to owner or the builder to build everything, what
they build with the permit around the house. My biggest
concern is the softscape on the west side. If you
can see, it's actually only two feet. Okay? But. The
whole little footer, it says, it should be 3. 3
feet and six inches. And taper down to a 5
feet and 11 inches. That is not even close. I
just, when I received this, this letter, okay, this notice
of committee for adjustment. I really study a little bit.
And I found out, we started measuring. And it's only
18 to 24 inches. So now my question is, why
did the construction begin. In a wrong dimensions. Okay. Thank
you. Um, that's a question for Townstaff. Through the chair,
I believe he's referring to the landscaping area. Um, the
town doesn't have setbacks for landscaping area, whether it's hard
or soft landscaping. Anyways, let's, let's move on to the
next. And that's, this blueprint, it shows exactly, um, hardcore.
And it says dotted lines. This will be a driveway.
The driver is already built. And also there is a
big three on the front of the house. Everything is
already ashwalt. Okay. So now what are we talking about
here? What I could understood that they're going to do
it now. We're going to approve this to build and
give them an expansion for another, I don't know, 18
metres or whatever in between two drivers. Now which driver
is he talking about? One on the east side or
on the west side. And why are we expanding this.
House business or something? I have no idea. I'm a
neighbour. It's already track park over there. Some kind of
a threatened business at the back. So what should I
do now. Measurements are wrong. According to this side plan.
Is that it for today. Well, I will leave you
this and I want to leave this in the record.
Okay. It's all in here. Thank you very much. Okay.
And I need to have the answers. What is the
next. Step. I did talk to my neighbour. Before a
very nice guy. And he assured me a hundred percent,
but everything was built according to bylaws and amendments of
Kalenan bylaws. But I was very surprised when I saw
this. And now it looks like somebody opened up a
can of worms. I get it. Okay. And, uh, thank
you very much. But I need an answer why and
when are they going to move this heart. Core backwards.
Now I only have 18 inches. And also on top
of this, he installed a sprinklers. And then I'm sprinkling
on my property. And it looks like that's all his.
Visual. It looks ugly. Okay. Anyways, thank you very much
for your time. And I appreciate I need some answers.
Thank you so much. And Townstaff, can we answer some
of these questions that he has concerned. Yes. Uh, through
the chair, uh, in terms of confirming the purpose of
this application, um, and what's being proposed through this specific
application is the addition of the driveway, um, at the
top of the plan, uh, to clarify the plan does
say proposed driveway. It's been determined that the driveway is,
um, has been constructed. And it was constructed without the,
the appropriate, relief. So that's, they're now seeking the relief
for that. And that was caught through, um, an enforcement
exercise. Um, so while the plan does say proposed, that's,
that's all that, uh, this application is seeking to, um,
to address is the relief for that. Uh, we can't
speak to the proposed hardscaping or truck parking or the
sprinklers. Those would be private matters. Um, that can be
dealt with specifically with, with the, the, your neighbour. I
don't know where he went. Um, with the neighbouring resident,
um, and if there's any further concerns or complaints, it
can go through by law enforcement if he sees fit.
But. Thank you. Um. Secretary Judge.
Memorable, go ahead. Uh, can I ask a question of
the deputleman who just spoke to us. Sir. Can I
ask you a question? Yeah. So what I don't understand,
um, they say on this plan proposed hardscape, what is
there right now. Did you say right now this, this
is what I received. But in actual measurements at only
18 to 24 inches. No, sorry. Where's the cross hatched.
It says proposed hardscape. There's the driveway. And then behind
the driveway adjacent to your property, what's theirs? It grass
now or is it? Nothing. It's a wall and a
hard asphalt. It's asphalt beside the building? Yeah. It's a
wall here in ashwater on this side, but the distance
from my property list is only a 18, 20 inches.
So there's asphalt all along the side of the building.
All the way down to, uh, to the end. It's
already been done. And like I said before, the driveway,
it's already, uh, the hard scope right here. Harscape is
all done. So I'm confused now why you're talking about,
you know, you're going to build it. You sort of
build. So a question to staff. Have you gone to
see the site. Through the chair? Yes. Site visit was
conducted at the time there was no trucks parked. Past
the driveway. Is that is their asphalt on the side
of the building side of the house. Was that asphalt.
Through the chair? I don't recall. My site visit was
for the proposed driveway that was shown in the site
plan. Not for the hardscaping that's past it. Right. So
the next question to staff, does the zoning bylaw permit.
Hardscaping to be asphalt. Through the chair, the definition of
landscaped area. I believe heartscape is, I believe it is.
You can have asphalt and concrete. But I know what
you're trying to do. Landscaping area means that portion of
the lot area of a lot required for the growth
and maintenance of grass flowers, bushes, trees, and other landscaping.
This definition may include any surfaced walk, surface patio, stormwater
management pod and swimming pool play facility deck not more
than 0. 6 metres above grade or similar, but shall
not include any driveway or ramp. Whether surface or not.
Because my question is, if that is asphalt beside the
house, you could consider it to be a driveway. And
then they've got a lot lighter driveway. If it is
asphalt and they can drive cars on it. So that's
a question for me. Just sounds like they've got to
a much wider driveway than the 14 metres. Okay, thank
you. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Um, Secretary Judd.
Threater chair. We do have another request from members of
public to speak to the application. Mr. Roman Gaber.
Good afternoon. Mr. Chair. Council. That picture is not what
is there. Um, there is, if you scroll down to
the bottom of that picture. Can you do that. To
the garage. The existing garage. There is a wall that
goes from the existing garage. All the way back to
within 90 feet of the end of the lot. I
believe that. On. The existing plan
from the outstanding. The outstanding part of the house, it
says 181 feet. Well, the wall on my side of
this property. I live at 29 Cranston. Goes to 90
feet and it's over four feet tall. Beside that or
inside that at the back is a putting green, an
artificial putting green. And beside that is the pool. The
pool is not where it is shown on this drawing.
There is, uh, another building at the back with three
sideds enclosed. Open to the pool. I can't really describe
it any better than that because I haven't gone on
to the property. I'm not allowed to do that, obviously.
But from my perspective, it looks like there may have
been a permit issued. There may have been plans presented.
But the homeowner did whatever they wanted to do. The
driveway part, everything around the main house and the garage.
Is hardscape. Driveway exposed aggregate, whatever. Behind the garage.
Is a lean to roof. And there's all kinds of
storage under that. When I left today, there was at
least two vehicles at the back of the property parked
near where the pool is. Not what is shown on
this. My request. If I can have one, is that
somebody go out and inspect this property and compare it
to whatever permits were issued. And, um, determine what bylaws
are actually been contravened. I consider the four foot fence
on my side to be a material elevation change. I
believe that there are rules within the bylaws to elevation
changes. It changes the entire drainage off that property. So
I think there's a lot more here that has to
be investigated than a small variance on.
Certain proximity to other properties. Thank you, Roman. Um, to
town staff, I know the application is about the proposed
driveway. And that's the application. But I think there's larger
concerns here that I'm actually seeing myself. That it's not
as accurate. I think there's more issues. Do they have
permits in place for the other items. That are there.
Through the chair, uh, with respect to any additional buildings,
um, planning does not have the answers to that at
this moment. That would be a building permit matter. Um,
and the matters that were and the questions raised, um,
are really enforcement matters. Um, so at this time in
terms of, yeah, in terms of the application, like we
can't confirm. Yeah. Okay. Just a reminder to committee. We
do have to stay with the proposed. Application, which is
the driveway. Uh, in my opinion, there are concerns here.
For sure. Um, that are not accurate. What's the stance
for talent? What's the town staff stance on this application?
Now. You know, through the chair in terms of staff's
planning opinion with respect to the driveway, that's really what
we can, we can speak to. If committee would like
to make a decision on that or proceed with a
decision based on the discussion that's held, um, then certainly
can do so. But the staff report has been prepared
in planning opinion has been prepared on the proposal before
us. Thank you. Um, Lali. And then Lalit, do you
like to say something. Yes, sir. So actually I just
want to say like we have all the permits, what
we made here. Right? So what we built here. So
you guys can check even online. And you can welcome
to come check. Two. Okay. Thank you. We just all
right. Uh, member DeCarlo. Yeah. So I'm just, I'm going
to allude to what Mary Bo was going towards. And,
and I think thence with respect to what the driveway
width is, um, I mean, we just heard from the
homeowner that in fact that they want to use this
iO way to drive to the back to the pool.
So in my opinion, that's the driveway. Um, so I'm
looking at this not from the proposed what's on the
site plan in terms of the 14 metres. But I
think we need to look at the overall side yard.
If this gentleman intends to use this access point on
the side yard as a driveway. Because in fact, that
is the driveway. Outside of what's on the municipal road.
So, um, that's, you know, in terms of its actor,
I think we're falling short of what's really happening here
and what the use of this driveway is going to
be. And I think there needs to be some form
of an update. In reality of what the uses for
these spaces are. If that is not going to be
a driveway on the side, then I think there should
be some prevention of some sort of a, of a
fence, some landscape feature to block that area to avoid
some type of driveway through to the back. Um, or
you have to admit that you're going to be using
it as a driveway. One or the other. You can't
have, can't have both in my opinion. So I think
the unanswered questions here. And I think we need to
get to the root of what in fact the driveway
width is here. And knots what's shown on paper. Um,
so I, I'm, I'm just going to put that out
there for the rest of the committee to consider as
well. Thank you. Thank you member DeCarlo. Um, any other
questions or comments for committee members. Thank you. Are there
any members in the public here in Council Chambers wanting
to speak on the application. Anyone else. I see none.
Thank you. We'll now move on to a motion for
the decision regard. And it's matter. Do I have a
mover in secondary, please? Remember French. Um, I'd like to
make a motion to defer this application with costs. Um,
so that we can get an update. On the uses.
And that someone can actually go out and take a
look at this property and confirm that what's on the
paper here is actually what's happening. Thank you. That's a
long winded motion. Sorry. I have a seconder, please. Member
bull. Any questions or discussion on the motion. I see
none. I'll call a vote. Member bull. In favor. Remember
to Carlo. In favor. I'm a French. Hey Varconi in
favor. Member Sodi. In favor. I'm also a favor for
the record. This motion has been deferred. Uh, with costs.
Six months or sooner. To the applicant, well, they don't
have a sign, but. And we need a sign next
time for the applicant. Thank you so much. Moving on
to Application 8019 - 26 located at three Holland Drive.
Applicant or Agent, please introduce yourself presenting your information. Okay.
Good afternoon committee. My name is Mike Govania. I'm a
senior associate with West and Consulting and I'm here on
behalf of the owner UConn Construction Inc. Um. Just to
be mindful of time, I won't go through all of
the variances in detail. And generally, we are, um, not
in general. We are fully supportive of staff's recommendation to
approve. We accept the conditions that are attached to those
recommendations. Uh, the variances before you are to facilitate the
construction of a new addition to the building, deconstruct the
old part and rebuild a new three - story office
component at the front. We did prepare this brief graphic.
Thank you, April, for sharing that on the screen. Um,
which just gives a bit of an outline of some
of the variance areas. Um, the variances, many of them
are not officially legal nonconforming because the building was built
many, many decades ago. And there are no records. However,
it has existed since about the 80s. Um, and so
most of them is just preserving the existing condition and
addressing, um, what's necessary for the proposed edition. So I'm
happy to go through them or I can just answer
any questions of committee. Thank you. Committee members, have any
questions or comments. Sorry. Town Platten, Desert. President New Referees.
Good afternoon. Mr. Chair, members of Committee. My name is
Yvette George Community Planner with the Town of Caledon. I
do have new information to present today. I do want
to note that pages five and six on schedule C
have been included in an air and will be removed
in the post agenda. Okay. Thank you. Uh, Committee members,
have any questions or comments. Remember? Sorry. Schedule D the
conditions or schedule C. So I didn't know. Through the
chair scheduled seat. There are comments that do not pertain
to this application. Comments, schedule C. Okay. Any other questions
or comments for committee members. I'm a French. Through you
chair to the delegate here. Um, how many employees will
be at this building working at this building. So there's
nine full - time employees at any given time. Um,
the reason for, so that would base on our traffic
assessment assumed nine parking spaces at the maximum time that
they would be used. The remaining 15 is for visitors
to the site which would primarily be architects, engineers, um,
potential purchasers. Um, the traffic study does support based on
the nine employees. Thank you. So two in the warehouse
and seven in the office. Thank you. Do you any
other questions or comments from committee members. Member DeCarlo. Jury
to the applicant. So current use of the building is
what. It's currently a warehouse and has a very small
office component at the front. Um, the existing office at
the front is going to be demolished to make way
for a three - story edition. Which is a combination
of office and warehouse. Okay. The same use of the
same type of business use. Same business. It's the same
owner that's existing on the property. Uh, the office space
is going to contain, um, a large, large boardroom areas,
some areas for staff members that attend the site for
site meetings. Um, but it's a full office use. Okay.
Propose use of storage at rear. What, what is the
intended of that? The outdoor storage at the rear, which
is blue on the screen is existing and permitted. And
what's that. Uh, it's outdoor storage of it is a
forming company. There's a lot of concrete forming. So it's
equipment used for the construction process and completed material. Okay.
Okay. No further questions. Thank you. Any other questions committee
members. Comments. I see none. Oh, I see none. Uh,
Secretary's name registered to delegate this application. Through the chair,
the town has not received any requests from members of
the public to speak to the application. Any members in
the public council chambers wanting to speak on this application.
C none. Now move on to a motion for decision
regarding this matter. It's a reminder to Committee attached to
staff report as schedule D draft conditions. Do I have
a mover secondary, please? Number bowl. Jim be approved subject
to the conditions and scheduled the staff report. Thank you.
Secondar please. Member French. Any questions discussion on the motion.
See non callable member bowl in favor. Member to Carlo
in favor. French in favor. Aber Coney in favor. I'm
Rasodi. In favor. I'm also in favor for the record
of motion has carried and has been approved with the
second conditions to the applicant. You could now remove the
sign. Thank you very much. Moving on to Application A
04 - 2 - 26 located at zero Highway 50.
With the applicant or agent, please introduce yourself presenting new
information. Uh, go ahead, Daniel. Uh, hello. Good day committee
members, uh, staff and, uh, members of the public. Do
I have access to the camera? Or is it, uh,
yeah, you need to share something. No, I was just
wondering if, uh, because, um, because, um, if the camera
was working, but I guess it's okay. I don't think
you can see me, but it's okay. If you could
hear me, that should be sufficient. We can't see you.
We just, we can hear you, but I think that's
on your end more than ours. Okay. Um, just give
me one second. We have a, we do have a
plan that we can, she's ready to share the site
plan. Okay.
Perfect. Um. Just so yeah, so my name is Daniel
Branzia. I'm here from Smart Center's REIT. And we own
the property at, uh, the Southeast corner of Healy Road
and Highway 50. It's vacant lands. Um, but we are
developing it right now with two additional retail units, uh,
it will be an expansion to the existing smart centres
Bolton. Uh, shopping centre. And, um, we are now going
through site plan approval and designing the site. And the
reason why we're here is to ask the committee if
we could reduce the parking space setback. To Highway 50
from nine metres to two metres. To seven metres, sorry.
Nine metres to seven metres. And, um, the associated planting
strip, the landscape planting strip from nine metres to seven
metres as well. Uh, overall a two metre reduction. The
reason is because, um, originally just for some background information
on this file. Originally, we were providing about 10 metres
set back to Highway 50 for the parking and for
the landscaping. However, uh, through the site plan approval process,
which we're going through now, the region of peel has
requested a road widening. So they would like to take,
uh, approximately 2. 44 metres along the frontage of the
property, which basically puts us a little bit short of
the zoning requirement. So it wasn't an intentional design by
us. It was a requirement to meet peel regions Road
Widening standards. And so we are going to, um, provide
some enhanced landscaping along a regional Route 50. It's going
to look really great when it's built out and done
lots of trees and bushes and native species. Uh, the
public realm is going to look really nice. And, um,
ultimately this would really only affect 17 parking stalls, uh,
along Highway 50, as you can see at the, at
the bottom of the plan, uh, which is the only
Parkinson's be affected. And, uh, everything else would, would, would
match the existing shopping centre and the overall design. So
we, we hope that the committee. Will support our request.
And if you have any questions, uh, please let me
know. Thank you. Thank you very much. Uh, talent doesn't
planner. Please introduce yourself through your chair to the committee.
Good afternoon. Chris Bean planner with the town of Caledon.
I have no further information to add. Thank you. Members
of the committee, have any questions or comments, concerns. I
see none. Secretary Treasure, has anyone registered delegate to this
application. Through the chair to town has not received any
requests from members of the public to speak to the
application. Thank you. Any members of the public council chambers
have any questions or comments on the Application. C none.
We'll now move on to a motion for decision regarding
this matter. Do I have a mover in Secondary, please?
Memorable. Application be approved. Secondary member French. Thank you. Any
questions or discussion on the motion. Is the nine call
a vote member? In favor. To Carlo. In favor. I'm
a French member. Member Coney in favor. Member Sodi. And
favor. I'm also in favor for the record. Emulsion has
carry. This matter has been approved to the African Please
Remove the sign. Great. Thank you. Thanks. Have a good
day. Bye bye. Moving to Application A 048 - 26
located at 41 Barry Down Drive. Would the Applicant or
Agent introduce yourself presenting new information. Good afternoon.
Um, I'm the Applicat on behalf of the homeowners. And
the new information. Today. Thank you. Uh, Town doesn't it,
planner. Please introduce yourself for sending you information. Through the
chair, Cindy Juba, planning technician. I have no new information
to provide. Thank you Committee members. Any questions or comments
on the application. C9. Secretary has a registered delegate to
this application. Through the chair, the town has not received
any requests from members of the public to speak to
the application. Did you have. It? Yep. Memorable. Question? Yeah.
I said I didn't see your hand. Sorry, I missed
it. Um, a question to the applicant. Has this addition
already been constructed? Yes. Yes, it has. Without a building
permit. That's correct.
Any other questions or comments? C. None. Ball. Okay.
Um, are there any members in the public? Did I
ask you a little? No, I have not. No. Secretary
Treasure. Is anyone? We did that, yeah. Aaron, you want
to council Chambers have any concerns or comments on the
Application. See none, but I'll move on to a motion
for a decision regarding this matter. Do I have a
mover in secondary, please? Member Sodi. I moved out the
application be approved subject to the schedule's DNE. Thank you,
Secondar, please. Remember, Coney, thank you. Any questions or discussion
on the motion. I see none. We now call a
vote, member bull. In. Favor. Thank you. Remember to Carlo.
In favor. Of a French. Favor. Remember Coney in favor.
Our sodi. In favor. I'm also in favor for the
record. This motion is carried. As matter has been approved
with the second dish. Thanks. You can now remove the
sign too, please. Thank you. Thanks. Uh, moving on to
Application 8. Yeah. Yeah. Sorry. So this is the second
application that's come before us today. That has already been
built, already been done. And then they're coming and asking
for forgiveness. I don't know, like what are the consequences?
Is it okay for everyone to just go build and
then come and see us? And, you know, if they
do it within the specs, it's okay. I don't think
this is right. You memorable. But I'd like to staff
to report back to us on what the consequence is,
uh, the town. In terms of law and policy on
people who build without building permit. Like to know that.
There has to be a consequence, right? All right. Thank
you. Um, moving on to application A 50 - 26
located at 28 McFal Street. With the applicant or agent,
please introduce yourself in presenting your information on the Application.
Good afternoon. I am John Vanderwald. The agent for Michel
Payne here, the resident. At 28 McFaul and homeowner. We
don't have anything too much to add other than there
was a complaint lodged by the one neighbour at 22
McFal. Do I respond to that now or after she
has spoken? Maybe after she's a registered speaker today. So
maybe after she, once she comments, then you can. Thanks,
John. Thank you. Would the town planner yourself presenting a
new information? Through the chair, Yvette George Community Planner. I
have no new information to provide. Thank you. Do the
members of committee have any questions or comments. Remember.
Con. Uh, yes through the chair to the applicant. The
complaint we received by the neighbour does seem legitimate. It
is going to take a lot out of his views
of his windows. So I have a concern about that.
Do you want me to respond to that? Yes, please.
Okay. Um. On the property survey that Michelle has had
done, okay. Um, the neighbor's house is 1. 2 metres.
From the property line. This is an open carport, okay?
And it's proposed to be one metre away as well.
So do that in English, uh, okay. It's seven foot
four away from the property line. Um. So it's still
a fair distance away. Okay.
And it is an open car part. She parks her
car there already. So all you're going to see is
a little bit of the roof. Uh, in the area
photos, we can see a temporary graduate. That has been
removed. That has been removed. And that was actually right
on the property line. Okay. That was actually placed right
on the property. Yeah. That has been removed. A while
ago already. Okay. Okay. So it's not, it's not there.
It's not there now. No, it's not. No. Okay. So
it will be less, we're a metre further away than
that. Uh, temporary carport was. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Thank
you. Any other questions or comments from committee members? C9.
Secretary. Memorable. Maybe for the applicant.
When I look on that street, there are no other
garages in the location that you are proposing them. A
lot of people park in their front yard. Are they
have garages in their backyard. So it's not covering up
other people's windows. Have you contemplated putting something in your
backyard. So it's not, so it isn't adjacent to your
neighbor's windows. Should I speak for us? Yeah, you can
speak there, Michelle. Do the chair? Yeah, just state your
name, please. Michelle Payne, homeowner of 28 McFall Street. Of
the 11 properties on 28 McFarland McFaul. Street. 367 of
them. Have garages. One is technically on judge. They all
have garages that were either set back. Or attached within
the house. Even the complaint of, um, 22 has a
garage setback. The layout of my property, unfortunately does not
allow me to make a garage. Set back behind my
house. Due to the way it was built prior to
my purchasing of it in 2022. If I was to
put a garage further back, I would be taken down
too many trees and disturbing too much of a landscape.
The other houses that Mrs. Mc O'Grady has indicated in
her complaint package of not having garages. The one right
north of me, which is number 36. Their property, their
house takes up the whole width of their property. It's
a two - story red brick house. And they're parking
is all in front of their house. From one side
of the property to the other. The house next to
that, number 38 is a grey house, one and a
half story. To the north of their house, they have
availability to build a garage or a cardboard. If they
so desire. Their driveway to the right of their house
also can accommodate multiple cars. She also included a picture
of number two George Street, where there's no parking, no
garage. But there is an old barn that's been on
the property for over 100 years. That if they chose
to, they can park in. But that property's driveway is
very much to the east of the house, and they
can accommodate multiple cars. I would. Like to have this
lean to just to protect my vehicles from the elements.
When I had that temporary carport on my driveway, I
had not heard one issue from the Mrs. Oedy regarding
it. It also stood at eight feet tall. There was
no complaints through the bylaws regarding that to my knowledge.
So four years of that being structured there. She did
not say anything to me. And, um, only now is
she bringing up an issue with me wanting to put
this lean to in this comfort. Okay. Thank you so
much for that. Thank you. Memorable. So a question maybe
to your consultant. When I look at the pictures of
the lean - to that you had there, it was.
Below the height of the windows on the adjacent property.
Um. So how, when I look at your plans, I
think the roof of the carport is higher than that.
I'm wondering, is there, would it make a difference. If
you reduce the height of the carport roof? Cause that's
really the issue. And if so, would it change the
effect on the neighbours. So excuse me, you're asking to
reduce the height over at the closest to 22 McFal
then. Is that what you're asking? Uh, to the south.
Yeah. Or. Yeah, to decrease the height overall. Would it
make a difference. Um. Right? Because when I will look
at the lien to the, I don't know what you
call it, the fabric one. It wasn't as high. It
was considerably lower than what you're proposing. So it wouldn't
have the same impact. What you're proposing now, what have
it's more significant impact on the neighbours? Not necessarily. No,
because don't forget that carport was right at the property
line. Okay. And it did have, um. Michelle has a
picture of it there. I may present. I have a
picture. I'm looking at a picture of it right now
on Google Maps. Okay. Are you looking at this picture
here? Absolutely. I'm looking at. A car in it, but
I'm looking at it. That centre peak of that temporary
carport. Stood eight feet tall. And. That and her windows,
how tall are her windows from the ground? Her windows
are about eight feet off the ground. Cause I, I
was just over there. Uh, this morning and took a
look. And to the windowsill, it's just under eight feet
to the window sill because she's got three rolls of
block, which is two feet. Then the floor level. And
then, then the window above that. So this, I've also
did a, um, a bit of a sketch where. The
sunlight would come. Number one, it's facing north by northwest.
Okay. So you don't get a lot of sunlight from
that anyways. Okay. But I took a shadow line from
the peak of the main house. I don't know how
I can show this to you other than pass it
round. Um, I took a line from here. If you
can see it down to the edge of the roof
and down further. Okay. Can you see that. That there
is 5'11, which would be at her house. Her windows
are way higher than that. Okay. Okay. So it would
not really. So the car report was higher. The original.
Those freestanding carport was higher. It was higher. In the
middle. It's a peak. Was a peak. Not at the
end at the where it was adjacent to a property,
how high it was. It wasn't, it wasn't the peak
of it. Right? It was six feet at the side.
Six feet to eight feet. It would have been, uh,
right about here. Okay. Which is the property line. That's
where the current port was. So it's, it's really not
appreciably higher. And what's your proposing by look on your
site plan. Just so that I know is eight feet,
eight inches. To. To talk of the beam. Top of
the beam with the top of the roof being higher.
Right? Yeah. Okay. Do you want to lower. It. Like
a foot? Yeah. I mean, if, if it, if it
makes it, uh, more palatable to council, we can lower
that by a foot if you like. But we need
room for Michelle still to be able to walk under
and clean her car and et cetera. Right. Understand that.
Yeah. Like we can increase the slope of that roof
and drop it. Drop it a foot if that would,
uh, appease. Counsel. We're open to that. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Okay. Any other commit questions? Remember DiCarlo. Sorry.
And members through you, Chair. Um. Just working through some
of the technical aspects of this. I mean, he's typically,
typically these three metre access ways were provided for these
types of communities to allow for a rear yard access
of a car or a garage or some sort. And
that's the reason why they kept these three metre side
yards just to allow you to do that. If you
wanted to. And that was the, that was way the
zoning was written at the time. Fast forward to today,
if we were to look at this as an accesser
structure, the only reason why this is here today and
we're asking for this one metre is because it's attached
to the house. That's the only reason. If it wasn't
attached to the house, this structure could stay at one
metre without a problem. And we wouldn't have this meeting
here today at all. It's just because it's right tied
to the house. And, um, so I think by reducing
the height by a foot, um, is it going to
help anything? You still have a root surface. You're going
to look at when you look out the window. Regardless.
Um, as you slope and upwards, um, I mean, the
only thing that I can suggest here is I don't
know why we have this huge, uh, overhang on the
outside of it. I'm assuming that the one metre is
to the, to the post, not to the, not to
the soffit. Am I correcting that assumption. Yeah. Yes, you
are correct. So it's to the soffit. It's not to
the post? No, it's to the, uh, post. Okay. So,
you know, possible reduction. Most definitely would, you know, would
be the best thing to do is try to reduce
that overhang. I don't think you needed that large. You
can, you know, get it to a six inches and
do what you need to do. You're already sitting at
eight, eight foot eight. Um, to the underside of the
soffit. But that structure that's proposed on top, I can
guarantee it's going to be a lot thicker than what's
shown there. Looks like a little piece of two by
six. That's not going to happen, it's not going to
work. It's going to have to be a little, probably
double that size. No, I do. Two by six would
work for rafters. That pass is building code. Uh, I
beg to differ on a snow load. I don't think
you're going to, I don't think you're going to get
it at one run. When you're dealing with a roof
load at that slope because that's technically a flat roof.
Not a slope roof. When you're down less than 412.
So I think you should relook at those factors. Um,
so again, um, I don't think, you know, the height
is an issue here. I think it's more so, you
know, uh, looking at it in terms of the four
tests and whether or not it is appropriate for the
area. You know, in my opinion, I think it does
meet all the four tests. It's, it's not, uh, it's
in keeping, uh, with, with what's going on there, what
was intended to happen. It is, uh, desirable. I don't
think it's a, you know, we're dealing with a massive
structure that's taller than the existing house. Um, you know,
the reasons why this does meet the four tests in
my opinion. And I don't think, uh, an overall, you
know, amendment to what's proposed here other than that soffit
be reduced to six inches potentially. Uh, because you're going
to have to put a gutter on that edge of
it just to keep the water from, from sloping off
and eroding soil anyways. Um, cause it will do that
at the base. So, um, and erode your footies. So,
uh, I, I, that's my opinion. I don't, you know,
I really think that this is a cut and dry
case regardless of, of, uh, what's been stated today. Thanks.
Thank you. Member French. Thank you. That was one, one.
Okay. Thank you. Remember Coney. Um. Sorry. Um, sorry. Yeah.
Go ahead. Through the chair to member de Carlo, did
you suggest that it should be reduced by one foot
the height of it. Uh. No, I suggest to keep
the height as is, but reduce the overhang beyond the
post. Um, you see how it's, it seems like it's
two feet beyond. Uh, I would just go six inches
after that post. And not intrude more into that one
metre side yard. Because you're basically sitting, uh, probably a
foot away from the fence line to her, to her
sight line. So it's actually pushing it back to the
post. But the height is already there. I mean, eight
foot eight. Is a typical garage door height for any
vehicle. Uh, you know, uh, if the snow on it,
you know, you can imagine you might lose a few
inches as it is. So, you know, eight foot eight,
you're on the bare minimum of, uh, of, of, of
many types of vehicles. Thank you, member DeCarlo. Uh, yeah,
we'll get the, okay, any other questions for committee members.
C9, Secretary of Treasures, anyone registered delegate to supplication. Through
the chair town has received one request from members of
the public to speak to the application. They have also
provided written comment and it was circulated to the committee
members. Please go ahead and misogrady. Thank you. Sorry about
that. I was worried you were voting already. No, no,
you, we had young. Okay. It's okay. Um, I do
have a prearranged speech here and it might be repetitive
on some of the stuff, but I'd like to, if
you can give me the five minutes for that, I
want to thank you for allowing me the opportunity to
speak today. My name is Judy Prima and I'm here
to speak on behalf of my friend Lindo Grady understanding
how difficult it can be to speak publicly. I have
offered to help wrote today being a friend of Linda's
for over 40 years. I will respect your time in
knowing you have had the opportunity to review the submitted
opposition statement in advance of the herring. Which in our
opinion, identify that the minor variants did not comply to
all the four tests. If I may quickly summarize the
proposed carport is asking to be a mayor one metre
from Linda's property rather than the bylaw setback required of
three metres, though a couple of metres on paper reads
to be minor and insignificant in reality, each metre counts,
especially if you consider beyond beyond the property line that
the current neighbouring house is a mayor one metre from
the driveway. In addition, we believe the one metre does
not take into consideration the overhang, which we just confirmed
today. Which will further negatively affect the natural light coming
into your windows, where she currently works from home 90
percent of the time at our dining room table. The
slope group would become an eyesore in obstructing the view
from her windows, her bottom window is seven foot high.
And now she would have to be looking at a
carport roof line, an overhang and a whole carport roof
rather than the current open space that she has. With
the water running off the slope roof directly onto her
property during heavy rainfalls, which we all know have become
extreme these days. This could easily flood her basement, which
she uses as added living space when her children and
grandchildren visit. Linda has shared that the applicant, Michelle. Uh,
purchased her home approximately four years ago. And I understand
that the relationship between Lyndon Michelle, thus far has been
good and respectful. You know, the carport, for example, six
foot, Linda's window is seven and it's the peak that
was eight. So Linda had shared that the applicant, Michelle.
Purchased her home approximately four years ago. And I understand,
I think I'm repeating myself that they've had a good,
good relationship. Linda has lived in her modest home for
20 years where she was a sole provider in raising
her two children. And since become a grandmother, Linda continues
to work hard to the stay and continues to work
long hours at her dining room table in hopes of
looking forward to retirement one day. Over the 20 years
that Linda has lived there. Prior homeowners approached Linda with
considering adding a garage or car porch next to her
home in which she shared her concerns with them. And
no minor variants application had been submitted until today. Today
at the new homeowner Michelle in being a respectful neighbour,
she is. Uh, did text Linda prior to applying to
the minor variants. Michelle Ascalinda, if she would be opposed
to the minor variants, explaining that she did not want
to incur a cost to apply for the minor variants
and if it was a problem with Linda. She had
communicated to her prior neighbours share that she was not
in agreement with building a structure being so close to
her home. Today, Lind is here before the Committee of
Adjustments in opposition of the minor variants is noted in
her submission. And though Linda empathizes why Michelle would like
a carport, Michelle knowingly purchased a home without a carport.
Linda will be 65 years old this year. And as
we all know, a homeowner's large assassin - free retirement
is their house. In addition to the concerns expressed already,
the true potential of Linda's resale value of her home
may not truly be realised. In fact, it could neglectly
impact her resale value should this variance be approved, in
that the home's main dining room and bedroom windows would
have an unsightly obstructed view of a car pour affecting
the natural light coming into the main living areas. Most
concerning is the stormwater runoff directly on to Linda's property,
increasing the risk of the basement flooding, requiring cost of
remediation, and who's going to pay for this. Today, Linda
is asking the Committee of Adjustments to please consider all
the information provided. Please kindly take into consideration the negative
impact this will have on Linda's quality of life that
she's enjoyed for the past 20 years. The negative impact
of Linda's future resale value as she is entering into
her retirement years. And to respect, remember that Michelle, knowingly
purchased a home for years ago, that did not have
a carport. Perhaps a solution today. I'm going to repeat
what some of you said, in which we ask both
Michelle and the town of Caledon to consider would be
an extending the driveway further back into Michelle's yard to
allow the carport to be built immediately behind Linda and
Michelle's house. The trees are industries on Linda's property. She
just mentioned that to me. In addition, the roof slope
should be reconfigured to ensure water runoff does not come
directly onto lendus property. This solution would provide to Michelle
her desired carport and in turn address Linda's concern that
could actually satisfy both parties and better suit the character
of the neighbourhood with all the cars and garages being
set back. Today, Linda's asking the committee to either reject
the minor variants as submitted for the reasons explained today
based on the Nugget Impact of the Carport being built
in such close proximity to her house or to defer
the decision of the minor variants to allow Michelle in
her contractor time to redesign the carport and move in
it back away from between the houses. I would also
ask if this is an option to move the carport
back, the Michelle and her contractor consider including Linda prior
to coming back to the Committee of Adjustments to reassure
Linda that the stormwater runoff from the roof is being
addressed. The suggestion could actually address both Michelle's needs and
Linda's serious concerns in which they both could continue to
have a good, respectful relationship. And it would maintain the
character of the neighbourhood. We just want to know if
this is possible. And we thank you for consideration and
would be pleased to answer any questions you may have.
Thank you. Any questions for the, uh, neighbours. C none.
Thank you so much. Are there any members in the
public here in Council Chambers? Wanted to speak on this
application. Uh, yeah, you can comment to the comments yet.
Right. Thank you for the chair and committee members
of hearing my refuttal. Just makes you stick to the
like proposal part of it. Yeah. Thanks. Um. Ms. Ogrady
claims that a carport roof will hinder her natural light
coming in through her curtains. In the four years that
I have lived at this property, these fixed closed windows
have never, ever seen the curtains drawn in the dining
room or lifted in the bedroom so that she can
look out and see. The open space of the side
of my house. Or former carport. In her suggestion of
moving the carport backwards neglects the fact that right behind
the side of my house, there's a hot tub that
was there previously before I purchased the house. And a
duck adjacent to the hot tub. The trees and foliage
I mentioned earlier are on my property. I have the
people prior to me put in electrical lighting systems through
the ground to light up portions of the backyard. I
have a lilac tree. I have two other trees beside
the lilac. Missile Grady has two very big maple trees
that are close to our property line. That would take
down trees if needed to be moving things back. There's
really no option to move a carport backwards. Into the
property behind her house and my hips. Considering my house
goes much further back into my property than her property.
If mistal grady had asked me, I would have told
her from the beginning, I have every intention of having
eave troughs and a downspout into my property so that
my foliage and property will have water for the trees
and the shrubs. Also in the text message conversation that
I sent to Ms. O'Grady on Wednesday, May 13th in
the afternoon. Stating that I, this is what I intended
to do. And that I would like to have the
minor variant applied for. And if she had any problems,
I said it's an open carport, not closed like a
garage. Please let me know your response right away as
I need to submit for the variance. And if you're
going to have a problem with it for any reason,
I do not want to waste 2, 700 dollars on
an application. Thank you so much and have a good
rest of your day. Her response to me was, hi
Michelle, thank you for reaching out. And I appreciate your
following the bylaws, codes and regulations. At the moment, I
would have to say no, Linda, to which I responded
saying thank you for getting back to me. I appreciate
it and I will proceed with the application. On May
13th, had she just said yes, I have concerns. I
don't think this will work for me. We would not
be wasting our time here. And I would not be
wasting this gentleman's time and my money on something that
she was obviously not approving of from the very beginning.
Yes, I bought a house that did not have a
garage or a carport. I don't believe four posts in
a roof. Hinder the look of the neighbourhood. If you
look at number three, George Street, and I do have
an image of that, which is right across the street
for me that I must look at every day, this
house has not have any siding on it for more
than 10 years. It has not been finished. I would
say that would hinder the look of the neighbourhood more
than four posts and a slight roof slight lean of
a roof. Okay. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank
you. Um. Thank you to committee members. Any questions or
comments? Do the applicant. It's your last fraud. Nope. You
can be sitting next. Yep. Go ahead. Comment is the,
uh, applicant mentioned that these would be main windows to
the bedroom and the dining room. They are smaller windows
than, so the window at the front, which I'm assuming
is a dining room according to her letter has a
large window on the front. That would be the main
window. This is not blocking a main window. And same
thing in the bedroom. It's a smaller window facing the
side, but around the corner, there's also another window which
is much larger at the back of her house. So
it's not really blocking. And it's the north side. So.
Thank you. Day. A minute. Yeah, go ahead to rebottle
quickly. Two seconds. We just don't, we want to make
sure this is on the proposal. This is not like
a neighborly thing. So I understand there's certain concerns. Uh,
we did hear what your concerns were. We allow you
to rebuttal their concerns. Um, is there anything new that
you want to add or is it? I just wanted
to add that she did say sorry. No, not yes.
Go ahead. And then the discursins are share curtains. That's
it. That's all. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. That's more
personal matter. So thank you everyone. We'll have the comments
now closed off. So we'll move on to the application.
There's no members in the public here at Council Schemers.
I want to speak in the application. We already went
through that. We will now move on to a motion
for this decision. Regarding this matter. As a reminder to
Committee of attached to staff report as schedule D. We're
draft conditions. Do I have a mover a seconder.
Move her a second here. Member to cart. Oh, oh.
My radicar. To approve application 050 - 26. Thank you.
With conditions. With conditions, with conditions. With detached conditions, yes.
The seconder, please. A member bull. Why do you hear
a wind sound. Any questions discussion on the motion. C9.
Call a vote. Member Bowl. In favor. Member DeCarlo. Favor.
I'm a French. Member Coney. In favor. Remember Sodir. I'm
also a favor for the record. The most are now
as carry. This matter has been approved with secondions. Thank
you. Moving to A Consent Applications. Application B018 - 26.
Located at 1 - 10 - King Street. With the
African or agent, please introduce yourself for presenting you information.
And yes, thank you. Go ahead. Yes. Stefan. Good afternoon,
Chair and members of the committee. Does everybody hear me?
Yeah. Go ahead. Great. Thank you. Uh, my name is
Stefan Steiku from MHBC Planning. And I'm representing the applicant
Emmanuel Reformed Church of Bolton. Uh, I don't have a
presentation today. Uh, given the scope of the application, but
we'll provide a quick summary to keep it brief. Uh,
so the Application before the committee seeks consent to establish
a three metre wide private servicing easement over part three
of the lens at 110 King Street West in Bolton
in favor of the adjacent property at 102 King Street
West. The easement will legally protect an existing water service
that serves 102 King Street, but crosses the 110 King
property line before connecting to the municipal. Uh, system within
the King Street right away. Uh, it might be helpful
to throw up the, uh, the draft R plan if
April or if somebody from, from the town has that
available. But just for the sake of time, I can,
I can continue, uh, it will. So the, the easement
will provide the necessary rights to access, inspect, uh, repair
the existing waterline. Um, and ultimately this easement is required
as part of clearing conditions, clearing the conditions associated with,
uh, with the, the previously approved severance of 102 and
110, uh, King Street West. So as you can see
in front of you here, part two would be 102
King Street West part one would be 110 King Street
West and part three is the easement. That is the
subject of this application before you today. Um, so as
I mentioned, uh, this application directly addresses, uh, three conditions
from a previous consent application for, for a severance to
sever these two lots, uh, the application for consent was,
was approved with conditions. Um, and, you know, we're now
in the process of clearing those conditions. So we, we
do have about, um, another couple of months to, to
finish clearing those conditions. And this did come up. Uh,
this easement did come up in discussions with region staff.
We, we had a, um, we had a utility company
go out and do the locates for all the utilities
and long story short, they found that, uh, that water
line crossing over from part two, which is 102 King
onto part one, which is 110 Kinyon into the right
of way. Uh, so as with the previous, uh, associated
consent application, no new servicing development or physical changes to,
to either property or proposed. The applicant, the application simply
formalizes the existing servicing array arrangement. So the two properties
can continue to operate. Uh, independently following the severance. Uh,
thank you. And I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank
you. Any other questions, comments for committee members. Town doesn't,
please introduce yourself presenting information. Through the chair, Giuseppe Russo,
Community Planner with the Town of Calladin. I have no
new information at this time. Thank you committee members. None.
I don't see you online. Okay. Um, Secretary Tresating, we
registered delegate to this application. Through the chair, the town
has not received any request from members of the public
to speak to the application. Members in the public council
chambers here to speak on me. This application, CNON. We'll
now move on to a motion for decision regardless matter.
It was a reminder to this committee attached to staff
report is schedule F. We're draft conditions. Do I have
a mover secondary. Member French? I'll move that optician B018
- 26B approved. Thank you. Secondary, please. Memorable. Subject to
the conditions in schedule. Subject to the conditions. Thank you,
Mary. Kate. Is there any more discussion on the motion?
Not C9. We'll call a vote, member bull. Favor. Member
to Carlo. In favor. Number French. In favor. Remember Coney.
In favor. Mersodi in favor. I'm also in favor for
the record of the motion. As carry this matter has
been approved with the second distance. The applicant you can
now remove the sign. Thank you. Thank you. Moving to
Application B020 - 26 located at 1 - 2 -
1 - 0 - 0 Credit View Road with the
Applicant or Agent Pleasant Juice Yourself and present any new
information on the Application. Sebastian from RCI on behalf of
landowner. I do not have any new information. Thank you.
Thank you. Would the Town Planner doesn't introduce you presenting
new information. Through the chair. Tanja Dropball Senior Planner and
I have no new information. Thank you members of Community.
Any questions or comments. Sinan Secretary Chair, has anyone registered
deadlike his application. Through the chair, the town has not
received any requests from the members of the public to
speak to the application. Any members of the public account's
chambers here wanting to speak on this application. C none.
We now move on to a motion for the decision
regardless. Matter as a reminder to the committee, attach to
the staff report is scheduled E or draft conditions. Do
I have a mover secondary? Member Coney. Yep. In the
comments from, sorry, through the chair to staff. I noticed
that the real T - Services are asking for road
widening and long entire credit view Road frontage, but I
don't see that as a condition. Through the chair, so
realty services, their position is whenever there's an application, they
would like to receive road widening. Road widening would have
been through the previous consent, but we informed them that
it's going to be through the future draft plan, a
subdivision that's coming in. Um, so it's a future application.
It's still their comments. I included it. We will get
the widening that we need. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
Um, so the motions on the table, second. We don't
have. A member. Oh, can I have a motion, please?
I moved to the Application be approved subject to the
conditions set out and scheduled to the staff report. Secondar,
please. Member Coleman. Thank you. Uh, any questions or discussion
on the motion? See none. Um, we'll now call a
boat. Member Bull. In favor. To Carlo. In favor. Remember
French. In favor. Member Coney. In favor. Minnesota. In favor.
I'm also in favor of the record of the motion
has carry. This matter has been approved with the second
distance and, uh, to the Applicant, you can remove the
sign. This concludes the August 12, 2026 Committee Adjustment here.
I declare the hearing adjourn. Thank you.