[1:27] I will now call the August 12, 2026 Committee Adjustment
[1:30] Hearing to Order. As a reminder, this hearing is being
[1:33] held as a hybrid meeting with members of committee participating
[1:37] in person and remotely. Indician, the meeting is being streamed
[1:41] live on the Town's website for those attending today's hearing
[1:44] in person electronic devices, which emit a sound should be
[1:47] turned off or otherwise that the vibrator silent, please. All
[1:53] remarks and questions are to be directed to the chair.
[1:57] This will enable the hearing to be conducted in an
[1:59] organised manner. I will now conduct Committe Committee attendance. Call
[2:03] your name. Please use your mic. To. That was online.
[2:11] Memorable. Remember to Carlo. Member French. Present. Member Coney. Present.
[2:19] Member Sodi. President. I'm also president from member Van Boulgen
[2:24] since his regrets and will not be attending today's meeting.
[2:27] I would like to begin by taking a moment to
[2:30] acknowledge the land on which we gather, indigenous peoples, have
[2:34] unique and enduring relationships with the land, indigenous peoples have
[2:38] lived on and cared for this land throughout the ages.
[2:42] We acknowledge this and we recognise the significance of the
[2:45] land on which we gather and call home. We acknowledge
[2:49] the traditional territory of the heroine Wendat, Han the Nashani's
[2:53] Peoples, and the Unash Navik of the William Streeties. This
[2:57] land is part of the treaty and territory of the
[3:00] Mississaugas of the Credit First Nations. We honour and respect
[3:04] indigenous heritage and the long - lasting history of the
[3:07] land and strive to protect the land. Water, plants, and
[3:10] animals that have happened to this land for generations yet
[3:13] to come. In today's hearing, are there any members of
[3:17] committee who wish to disclose any pecuniar interests. C9. Any
[3:25] corrections to the minutes. Previous meeting. None. Can I get
[3:30] a mover. And a seconder for July 15th, 2026. Also
[3:37] moved the minutes. Member of French, secondary, please. Member Coney,
[3:41] thank you. Call a vote, member bull. In favor. Remember
[3:45] to Carlo. Member French. In favor. Member Coney. In favor.
[3:53] Member Sodi. In favor. I'm also a faveur for the
[3:55] record of the motion has carried. And passed. Are there
[4:00] any new requests by an agent or an applicant to
[4:03] defer or withdraw an application listed agenda. Is C9?
[4:16] Yep. Go ahead. Lalit Kumar. Yes, hire. Everyone follow. Yep.
[4:26] Go ahead. Yeah, I want to just know like you
[4:31] guys just, everybody's in the favor, just all people's like
[4:35] favourite, favourite, favourite. So I want to know, can I
[4:38] you repeat that question again for me. Oh, the question,
[4:44] yeah. If there's any agent or applicant, so if you're
[4:48] an applicant, do what you like to defer or withdraw
[4:52] an application listed on today's agenda. If you want to
[4:55] go continue with the hearing, then you don't have to
[4:57] say anything. Okay, perfect. Are you good? Yes. Okay. Thank
[5:04] you so much. Uh, we are moving on to regular
[5:10] business. Minor variant applications. Application A4 - 26 located at
[5:20] 27 Cranston Drive with the Applicant or Agent. Please introduce
[5:25] yourself and present any new information. Lalik Kumar, that's you.
[5:35] Yeah, it's me. Do you have anything new that you
[5:40] didn't put in the application that we adhere today or
[5:43] is everything that you put? Yeah. It's actually by far
[5:47] the driveway measurement, right? Yeah. It's under 26 - 7
[5:54] Cranston Drive in the front of that. So there's a
[5:57] specific space for that because I'm the cousin of the
[5:59] person who owns this house. So I'm attending this meeting
[6:03] behalf of him. Okay. So he's in right now in
[6:07] the back home, right? Okay. Yeah. So there's a measurement.
[6:12] So it's all most like we need relaxation of some
[6:17] like inches, maybe in a feed, like less than feet.
[6:22] For the driveway. We have a two drivers in the
[6:24] front of our house. That's why they complete for us.
[6:29] Okay. But there's nothing new on the application that we
[6:34] need to know about, right? Yes. Okay. Thank you so
[6:39] much. Uh, town planner or designate introduce yourself in presenting
[6:43] new information. Through the chair, Sabrina's material, planning technician. I
[6:48] have no new information. Thank you so much. Committee's members.
[6:51] Do you have any questions or comments on the application.
[6:55] Member France. Through you, Chair. I have two concerns. Uh,
[7:00] the first one is that there is no sign posted.
[7:03] So I'd just like clarification that there was one, but
[7:06] there was no sign when I drove past. And the
[7:08] second I know that the plan already noted this, but
[7:11] the job's been done. Like the work's all complete. So
[7:17] that's of a concern to me. Like why are we
[7:19] here? Like why are they coming now. So. Thank you
[7:23] very much. Thank you member French. Um, any other question
[7:28] member? So the two variants requested. One is for the
[7:34] second driveway, which apparently has already been constructed. But the
[7:38] driveway width, that, does that apply to the driveway in
[7:43] front of the garage. Through the chair, yes. So it's
[7:49] both driveways combined the measurement. Okay. So when was that
[7:54] driveway in front of the garage built. Through the chair?
[7:58] The original driveway. Yes. The original driveway that's too wide.
[8:06] Right. It's only supposed to be 10 metres and it's
[8:09] 14. 28 metres. Through the chair, um, measurement for both.
[8:17] So the driveway in front of the garage and the
[8:19] new access combined is 14 metres. So the driveway in
[8:23] front of the garage complies, but the new access, the
[8:28] new driveway that added to the existing, uh, brings it
[8:33] over. The permitted, um, maximum. So the driveway width doesn't
[8:39] apply to one driveway. It applies to both of them
[8:41] combined? Correct. That's the way the bylaws worded. Yep. All
[8:46] right. Thank you member. Boy member DeCarlo. Uh, member bull,
[8:52] just answer my question. Got it. Okay. Thank you. Any
[8:56] of the questions or comments for committee members. Member Coney.
[9:01] Through the chair to the applicant, uh, just wondering why
[9:05] you want to put a driveway right across the front
[9:07] of your house. What are your plans for this entrance.
[9:25] To the applicant, the questions towards you. Kansiya's name. Let
[9:31] me. Mr. Kumar. Yes, I'm here. So, um, my cousin
[9:41] is with me too. Can I ask him the question
[9:43] about this too. Uh, yeah. Go ahead. And back
[9:57] there. You made it to the way they considered 3D
[10:01] HSPs. But they were very solid. Sorry, excuse me. Excuse
[10:05] me. You're going to have to put your miter muke
[10:07] when you're ready to answer. Just, just raise your hand
[10:10] or just, uh, just say you're ready to speak. But
[10:13] you got to put your microphone on mute. No, no.
[10:16] That's a. Gentleman. He's a way of. It's just not
[10:19] very clear. If you could speak, um, slow. Or louder.
[10:24] Okay. Can you speak slower and louder. Yes, sure. I
[10:29] will speak soil louder. So what my cousin said. So
[10:33] the space on the one outside of our house. And
[10:36] one is whether the look of lover house. If we
[10:39] didn't make a, like the other second driveway, it looks
[10:42] not nice too. And we have a backside of the
[10:45] pool too. And we did not even touch any tree
[10:48] over there in the drivers near that too. That's why
[10:51] we made this too. So I'm in the front of
[10:54] the even dislocation. Like I'm sitting on the front of
[10:59] the house right now. If anybody's want to see the
[11:03] live video on it, I can show you guys. Okay.
[11:07] Okay. Thank you, member Coney. So can you tell me
[11:09] what is the purpose of it? I didn't understand. I'm
[11:13] sorry. Can you repeat what is the purpose of the
[11:16] driveway. Yeah. So it's just because of the space to
[11:22] going back and through the to the pool. Right? So
[11:25] the driveway is there to have access to the pool.
[11:29] Yes. And the one side is the garage. And sorry.
[11:38] One side is the garage. One side is the way
[11:40] to the pool. So you're going to have vehicles driving
[11:44] back to the pool. Is that what you mean? It
[11:47] says that it's going to be, uh, proposed hardscape beside
[11:51] the house. No, we don't drive back to the pool.
[12:00] Okay. And just for, just for public records, can you
[12:03] give us the name of the other person that was
[12:05] speaking. So with me right now? The other gentleman, your
[12:11] cousin. So he's in the back home. The owner of
[12:18] this building. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Memorable.
[12:26] Yes. I do have a question for the applicant. So
[12:31] on the side of the proposed driveway, the existing proposed
[12:35] driveway. You have hard scape. Um, what is that hardscape,
[12:44] sorry, is it there or is it proposed? And what's
[12:47] the purpose of it. Deer this way to the pool
[12:53] just to be look nice. Like if it's the grass
[12:55] over there, maybe with the like the rain, it will
[13:00] be wet. Like we can't walk on the breast that
[13:03] way. And, and you said, um, maybe I didn't understand
[13:11] that the driveway was on, you need the second driveway
[13:15] for access to the pool. Yes, right. I don't understand
[13:19] that because you can access the pool through the house
[13:25] or through the garage or on the side, other side
[13:28] of the house. You don't need a driveway toxis. The
[13:30] pool. Can you explain that, please? Yeah. Actually, we renovate
[13:35] all the house. So what we plan like we have
[13:40] a space on the side of the house. That's why
[13:42] we made this. It's not on this way. It is
[13:48] in the plan 2, right? Right. So it's on the
[13:51] screen. Yes. So just to tell, sorry memorable to town
[14:01] staff, just a couple concerns that are coming up with
[14:03] me is, uh, the concerned with the AWSC. They always
[14:08] thought that they're in front of. And then also. The
[14:12] tree protection zone. They took some trees down. And then
[14:18] it's saying from Townstaff report that you guys, they're responsible
[14:21] for utility permits and everything because they're so close to
[14:25] proximity to the area. So the question is from Town
[14:28] staff is, is it more important that they get these
[14:32] things in line before they come to the table here.
[14:38] Through the chair, um, transportation had no further concerns regarding
[14:42] the stop sign. They just wanted to ensure that the
[14:46] residents were aware that the stop line cannot be blocked.
[14:50] Um, it needs to remain visible for oncoming traffic. And
[14:53] will not be removed in the future. Uh, so the
[14:56] residents have been afforded this. Regarding the tree removal, um,
[15:00] our municipal law enforcement has completed investigation. And they determined
[15:04] that the trees were removed prior to the implementation of
[15:07] the tree bylaw. And therefore, no further action can be
[15:10] taken. Um, which landscape has no further concerns. Um, so
[15:16] repeat that they're, they're in the middle of dealing with
[15:18] the infraction of taking those movement, those trees. Just. The
[15:25] entire. The investigation has
[15:35] already been completed and they determined no further action can
[15:38] be taken. No further acts. Okay. Memorable. Sorry. What I
[15:42] read in the landscape comments and correct me if I'm
[15:44] wrong that they did construction within the tree protection zone
[15:49] and may have damaged a red oak tree. That's what
[15:53] I was reading. And so, uh, they, and I think
[15:58] it's, they should be responsible of that tree. Is damaged
[16:03] if it looks like there's damage after they've constructed. Um,
[16:07] so what's, you know, you say the further action. But
[16:10] if they've damaged a tree because they built without a
[16:14] permit or a tree protection zone, how do you use,
[16:19] let's say they should be planting another tree because they've
[16:21] damaged a tree. How do we enforce that? Where's the
[16:26] consequence. It sounds like there was enforcement. Was there enforcement.
[16:35] Through the chair there was enforcement in terms of looking
[16:39] into it? Um, and going through that route. Because it
[16:44] was done prior to the bylaw, there aren't necessarily consequences
[16:48] that could be taken afterwards with respect to this application.
[16:52] So if they can replant a tree, that would be
[16:54] nice of them to do. However, it's not a requirement
[16:57] from an enforcement perspective and enforcement was handled. This matter
[17:01] is unrelated to the minor variants application though. So I
[17:07] would just like to flag that. No, but if we
[17:09] want, if we were concerned about the tree, we could
[17:12] make them plant a new tree as a condition of
[17:16] this variant that this committee decided to grant it. I
[17:20] don't know. And do you know, is the red oak
[17:27] tree damaged? Is it a live dead? Do we know.
[17:37] Through the chair, I'm not entirely sure. I believe, um,
[17:42] landscape may have mentioned it was, it was removed. Um,
[17:45] but no further action can be taken. Landscape doesn't have
[17:51] an issue with. Me. Member Corni through the Chair to
[17:55] staff. So, so these people, they did the construction before
[18:00] they asked for a permit. They took the tree down
[18:03] when they shouldn't have. And the consequences for doing this.
[18:09] Is that correct? So the chair that is correct. Thank
[18:14] you. Move on. Uh, no. Member DeCarlo. Yeah, just start
[18:20] a couple of questions here. Um, so I'm just looking
[18:23] at the site plan in terms of its accuracy to
[18:27] today's construction. And I'm wondering if, if the accuracy is
[18:35] correct. So this driveway that you're proposing is what is
[18:42] what's built today. It's exactly as built. This 14 foot
[18:47] four inches wide. That's to the planner. City planner. Through
[18:57] the chair, um, what seems to have been built today
[19:01] is the, um, the proposed driveway, um, at 4. 37
[19:07] metres. Okay. And this was verified by you or just
[19:11] the client or I'm sorry, the homeowner. How was this
[19:16] dimetrium given to you? Uh, through the chair, this dimension
[19:19] was provided on the site plan. Okay. And that's what
[19:23] they went in for exactly that dimension. That's correct. Um.
[19:30] So also looking through the plan and I'm looking at
[19:33] the area where you're saying existing hardscape at the back
[19:37] of the building. It seems that there's a structure that's
[19:39] been built there and the pool. Is this new construction
[19:43] that's occurred? And this question is to the, uh, homeowner.
[19:49] The leap. Yes. I'm here. Yeah. So is the pool
[19:53] there now or, or not? Oh, it's the pool is
[19:55] there now. Okay. And you've also built a covered patio
[20:01] or a covered. No, we didn't cover papillou. Sorry. We
[20:06] did a covered pet to you. Okay. Did you acquire
[20:09] a permit for that as well. Uh, yes. So you
[20:14] had a permit for that. We, we have a permit.
[20:18] We, we applied the pyramid. Okay. So you have a
[20:23] permit. So the only thing that you did outside of
[20:24] your perno is construct this driveway. And I'm assuming you
[20:27] used the dry way to construct everything at the back.
[20:30] That's probably what where this driver came to light. Am
[20:34] I correct? Yes. Okay. So you're going to reinstate the
[20:39] pool. You're going to have this cabana. You're going to
[20:40] have this driver. Okay. So this dimension, you're very confident
[20:43] that 4. 37 metres is the actual width that you're
[20:47] proposing. Yes. It's a so it may the Arctic strand
[20:53] the designer. Right. So the 40. 7. You mean. Okay,
[21:01] fair enough. That's all the questions I have. Thank you.
[21:04] Kate, thank you. Uh, any members are committee members. Sorry.
[21:08] I have any comments, questions. C9. Secretary Church, does anyone
[21:15] register to delegate to this application? Sir, the chair town
[21:18] has received two request members of the public to speak
[21:22] to the application. I have the first one, Mr. Joseph
[21:25] Repe.
[21:36] Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. And everyone on a committee.
[21:42] Some of the stuff I could not understand what was
[21:45] going on actually. So I will give you my version.
[21:49] Where I think what happened in the last year, up
[21:51] to date. So, um, my name is Joseph Repick, owner
[21:56] of the 25 Cranston Drive. Now, before we begin, I
[22:00] just want to make sure that this blueprint is officially
[22:06] been stamped by the city of Caladin. As to build
[22:12] to that specification, wherever it's on that print. Sorry. Can
[22:20] you repeat that, the blueprint? Okay. Before we begin, this
[22:25] side plan should have been, I believe, approved last year
[22:31] or three months ago or six months ago. To give
[22:33] it to owner or the builder to build everything, what
[22:37] they build with the permit around the house. My biggest
[22:41] concern is the softscape on the west side. If you
[22:49] can see, it's actually only two feet. Okay? But. The
[22:57] whole little footer, it says, it should be 3. 3
[23:02] feet and six inches. And taper down to a 5
[23:06] feet and 11 inches. That is not even close. I
[23:13] just, when I received this, this letter, okay, this notice
[23:17] of committee for adjustment. I really study a little bit.
[23:21] And I found out, we started measuring. And it's only
[23:25] 18 to 24 inches. So now my question is, why
[23:30] did the construction begin. In a wrong dimensions. Okay. Thank
[23:37] you. Um, that's a question for Townstaff. Through the chair,
[23:44] I believe he's referring to the landscaping area. Um, the
[23:49] town doesn't have setbacks for landscaping area, whether it's hard
[23:52] or soft landscaping. Anyways, let's, let's move on to the
[24:00] next. And that's, this blueprint, it shows exactly, um, hardcore.
[24:08] And it says dotted lines. This will be a driveway.
[24:13] The driver is already built. And also there is a
[24:18] big three on the front of the house. Everything is
[24:20] already ashwalt. Okay. So now what are we talking about
[24:25] here? What I could understood that they're going to do
[24:29] it now. We're going to approve this to build and
[24:31] give them an expansion for another, I don't know, 18
[24:35] metres or whatever in between two drivers. Now which driver
[24:38] is he talking about? One on the east side or
[24:40] on the west side. And why are we expanding this.
[24:48] House business or something? I have no idea. I'm a
[24:52] neighbour. It's already track park over there. Some kind of
[24:54] a threatened business at the back. So what should I
[24:59] do now. Measurements are wrong. According to this side plan.
[25:12] Is that it for today. Well, I will leave you
[25:16] this and I want to leave this in the record.
[25:18] Okay. It's all in here. Thank you very much. Okay.
[25:21] And I need to have the answers. What is the
[25:27] next. Step. I did talk to my neighbour. Before a
[25:36] very nice guy. And he assured me a hundred percent,
[25:40] but everything was built according to bylaws and amendments of
[25:46] Kalenan bylaws. But I was very surprised when I saw
[25:51] this. And now it looks like somebody opened up a
[25:56] can of worms. I get it. Okay. And, uh, thank
[25:59] you very much. But I need an answer why and
[26:04] when are they going to move this heart. Core backwards.
[26:09] Now I only have 18 inches. And also on top
[26:12] of this, he installed a sprinklers. And then I'm sprinkling
[26:16] on my property. And it looks like that's all his.
[26:22] Visual. It looks ugly. Okay. Anyways, thank you very much
[26:26] for your time. And I appreciate I need some answers.
[26:29] Thank you so much. And Townstaff, can we answer some
[26:31] of these questions that he has concerned. Yes. Uh, through
[26:37] the chair, uh, in terms of confirming the purpose of
[26:41] this application, um, and what's being proposed through this specific
[26:46] application is the addition of the driveway, um, at the
[26:52] top of the plan, uh, to clarify the plan does
[26:56] say proposed driveway. It's been determined that the driveway is,
[27:00] um, has been constructed. And it was constructed without the,
[27:04] the appropriate, relief. So that's, they're now seeking the relief
[27:09] for that. And that was caught through, um, an enforcement
[27:12] exercise. Um, so while the plan does say proposed, that's,
[27:16] that's all that, uh, this application is seeking to, um,
[27:20] to address is the relief for that. Uh, we can't
[27:23] speak to the proposed hardscaping or truck parking or the
[27:31] sprinklers. Those would be private matters. Um, that can be
[27:34] dealt with specifically with, with the, the, your neighbour. I
[27:39] don't know where he went. Um, with the neighbouring resident,
[27:43] um, and if there's any further concerns or complaints, it
[27:47] can go through by law enforcement if he sees fit.
[27:52] But. Thank you. Um. Secretary Judge.
[28:02] Memorable, go ahead. Uh, can I ask a question of
[28:07] the deputleman who just spoke to us. Sir. Can I
[28:13] ask you a question? Yeah. So what I don't understand,
[28:20] um, they say on this plan proposed hardscape, what is
[28:26] there right now. Did you say right now this, this
[28:30] is what I received. But in actual measurements at only
[28:35] 18 to 24 inches. No, sorry. Where's the cross hatched.
[28:40] It says proposed hardscape. There's the driveway. And then behind
[28:44] the driveway adjacent to your property, what's theirs? It grass
[28:49] now or is it? Nothing. It's a wall and a
[28:53] hard asphalt. It's asphalt beside the building? Yeah. It's a
[28:57] wall here in ashwater on this side, but the distance
[29:00] from my property list is only a 18, 20 inches.
[29:03] So there's asphalt all along the side of the building.
[29:06] All the way down to, uh, to the end. It's
[29:10] already been done. And like I said before, the driveway,
[29:14] it's already, uh, the hard scope right here. Harscape is
[29:19] all done. So I'm confused now why you're talking about,
[29:23] you know, you're going to build it. You sort of
[29:25] build. So a question to staff. Have you gone to
[29:30] see the site. Through the chair? Yes. Site visit was
[29:36] conducted at the time there was no trucks parked. Past
[29:44] the driveway. Is that is their asphalt on the side
[29:47] of the building side of the house. Was that asphalt.
[29:54] Through the chair? I don't recall. My site visit was
[30:04] for the proposed driveway that was shown in the site
[30:08] plan. Not for the hardscaping that's past it. Right. So
[30:11] the next question to staff, does the zoning bylaw permit.
[30:18] Hardscaping to be asphalt. Through the chair, the definition of
[30:26] landscaped area. I believe heartscape is, I believe it is.
[30:33] You can have asphalt and concrete. But I know what
[30:38] you're trying to do. Landscaping area means that portion of
[30:41] the lot area of a lot required for the growth
[30:44] and maintenance of grass flowers, bushes, trees, and other landscaping.
[30:48] This definition may include any surfaced walk, surface patio, stormwater
[30:52] management pod and swimming pool play facility deck not more
[30:55] than 0. 6 metres above grade or similar, but shall
[31:00] not include any driveway or ramp. Whether surface or not.
[31:04] Because my question is, if that is asphalt beside the
[31:07] house, you could consider it to be a driveway. And
[31:12] then they've got a lot lighter driveway. If it is
[31:16] asphalt and they can drive cars on it. So that's
[31:22] a question for me. Just sounds like they've got to
[31:27] a much wider driveway than the 14 metres. Okay, thank
[31:29] you. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Um, Secretary Judd.
[31:37] Threater chair. We do have another request from members of
[31:40] public to speak to the application. Mr. Roman Gaber.
[31:52] Good afternoon. Mr. Chair. Council. That picture is not what
[32:01] is there. Um, there is, if you scroll down to
[32:10] the bottom of that picture. Can you do that. To
[32:16] the garage. The existing garage. There is a wall that
[32:23] goes from the existing garage. All the way back to
[32:28] within 90 feet of the end of the lot. I
[32:38] believe that. On. The existing plan
[32:48] from the outstanding. The outstanding part of the house, it
[32:54] says 181 feet. Well, the wall on my side of
[33:00] this property. I live at 29 Cranston. Goes to 90
[33:07] feet and it's over four feet tall. Beside that or
[33:14] inside that at the back is a putting green, an
[33:20] artificial putting green. And beside that is the pool. The
[33:25] pool is not where it is shown on this drawing.
[33:32] There is, uh, another building at the back with three
[33:40] sideds enclosed. Open to the pool. I can't really describe
[33:48] it any better than that because I haven't gone on
[33:51] to the property. I'm not allowed to do that, obviously.
[33:56] But from my perspective, it looks like there may have
[34:01] been a permit issued. There may have been plans presented.
[34:06] But the homeowner did whatever they wanted to do. The
[34:12] driveway part, everything around the main house and the garage.
[34:18] Is hardscape. Driveway exposed aggregate, whatever. Behind the garage.
[34:29] Is a lean to roof. And there's all kinds of
[34:35] storage under that. When I left today, there was at
[34:39] least two vehicles at the back of the property parked
[34:45] near where the pool is. Not what is shown on
[34:50] this. My request. If I can have one, is that
[34:59] somebody go out and inspect this property and compare it
[35:03] to whatever permits were issued. And, um, determine what bylaws
[35:11] are actually been contravened. I consider the four foot fence
[35:18] on my side to be a material elevation change. I
[35:25] believe that there are rules within the bylaws to elevation
[35:31] changes. It changes the entire drainage off that property. So
[35:39] I think there's a lot more here that has to
[35:42] be investigated than a small variance on.
[35:51] Certain proximity to other properties. Thank you, Roman. Um, to
[35:59] town staff, I know the application is about the proposed
[36:02] driveway. And that's the application. But I think there's larger
[36:07] concerns here that I'm actually seeing myself. That it's not
[36:13] as accurate. I think there's more issues. Do they have
[36:16] permits in place for the other items. That are there.
[36:28] Through the chair, uh, with respect to any additional buildings,
[36:31] um, planning does not have the answers to that at
[36:34] this moment. That would be a building permit matter. Um,
[36:37] and the matters that were and the questions raised, um,
[36:41] are really enforcement matters. Um, so at this time in
[36:45] terms of, yeah, in terms of the application, like we
[36:49] can't confirm. Yeah. Okay. Just a reminder to committee. We
[36:52] do have to stay with the proposed. Application, which is
[36:57] the driveway. Uh, in my opinion, there are concerns here.
[37:02] For sure. Um, that are not accurate. What's the stance
[37:06] for talent? What's the town staff stance on this application?
[37:10] Now. You know, through the chair in terms of staff's
[37:16] planning opinion with respect to the driveway, that's really what
[37:18] we can, we can speak to. If committee would like
[37:22] to make a decision on that or proceed with a
[37:25] decision based on the discussion that's held, um, then certainly
[37:29] can do so. But the staff report has been prepared
[37:35] in planning opinion has been prepared on the proposal before
[37:38] us. Thank you. Um, Lali. And then Lalit, do you
[37:45] like to say something. Yes, sir. So actually I just
[37:48] want to say like we have all the permits, what
[37:51] we made here. Right? So what we built here. So
[37:53] you guys can check even online. And you can welcome
[37:58] to come check. Two. Okay. Thank you. We just all
[38:02] right. Uh, member DeCarlo. Yeah. So I'm just, I'm going
[38:07] to allude to what Mary Bo was going towards. And,
[38:11] and I think thence with respect to what the driveway
[38:15] width is, um, I mean, we just heard from the
[38:18] homeowner that in fact that they want to use this
[38:21] iO way to drive to the back to the pool.
[38:23] So in my opinion, that's the driveway. Um, so I'm
[38:29] looking at this not from the proposed what's on the
[38:35] site plan in terms of the 14 metres. But I
[38:38] think we need to look at the overall side yard.
[38:40] If this gentleman intends to use this access point on
[38:43] the side yard as a driveway. Because in fact, that
[38:46] is the driveway. Outside of what's on the municipal road.
[38:50] So, um, that's, you know, in terms of its actor,
[38:54] I think we're falling short of what's really happening here
[38:56] and what the use of this driveway is going to
[38:57] be. And I think there needs to be some form
[38:59] of an update. In reality of what the uses for
[39:03] these spaces are. If that is not going to be
[39:05] a driveway on the side, then I think there should
[39:07] be some prevention of some sort of a, of a
[39:10] fence, some landscape feature to block that area to avoid
[39:13] some type of driveway through to the back. Um, or
[39:17] you have to admit that you're going to be using
[39:18] it as a driveway. One or the other. You can't
[39:21] have, can't have both in my opinion. So I think
[39:24] the unanswered questions here. And I think we need to
[39:26] get to the root of what in fact the driveway
[39:29] width is here. And knots what's shown on paper. Um,
[39:34] so I, I'm, I'm just going to put that out
[39:37] there for the rest of the committee to consider as
[39:39] well. Thank you. Thank you member DeCarlo. Um, any other
[39:47] questions or comments for committee members. Thank you. Are there
[39:52] any members in the public here in Council Chambers wanting
[39:54] to speak on the application. Anyone else. I see none.
[39:59] Thank you. We'll now move on to a motion for
[40:02] the decision regard. And it's matter. Do I have a
[40:04] mover in secondary, please? Remember French. Um, I'd like to
[40:12] make a motion to defer this application with costs. Um,
[40:17] so that we can get an update. On the uses.
[40:23] And that someone can actually go out and take a
[40:25] look at this property and confirm that what's on the
[40:27] paper here is actually what's happening. Thank you. That's a
[40:31] long winded motion. Sorry. I have a seconder, please. Member
[40:35] bull. Any questions or discussion on the motion. I see
[40:42] none. I'll call a vote. Member bull. In favor. Remember
[40:46] to Carlo. In favor. I'm a French. Hey Varconi in
[40:51] favor. Member Sodi. In favor. I'm also a favor for
[40:54] the record. This motion has been deferred. Uh, with costs.
[41:00] Six months or sooner. To the applicant, well, they don't
[41:05] have a sign, but. And we need a sign next
[41:08] time for the applicant. Thank you so much. Moving on
[41:12] to Application 8019 - 26 located at three Holland Drive.
[41:17] Applicant or Agent, please introduce yourself presenting your information. Okay.
[41:26] Good afternoon committee. My name is Mike Govania. I'm a
[41:28] senior associate with West and Consulting and I'm here on
[41:31] behalf of the owner UConn Construction Inc. Um. Just to
[41:36] be mindful of time, I won't go through all of
[41:38] the variances in detail. And generally, we are, um, not
[41:42] in general. We are fully supportive of staff's recommendation to
[41:44] approve. We accept the conditions that are attached to those
[41:48] recommendations. Uh, the variances before you are to facilitate the
[41:52] construction of a new addition to the building, deconstruct the
[41:56] old part and rebuild a new three - story office
[41:59] component at the front. We did prepare this brief graphic.
[42:03] Thank you, April, for sharing that on the screen. Um,
[42:06] which just gives a bit of an outline of some
[42:08] of the variance areas. Um, the variances, many of them
[42:13] are not officially legal nonconforming because the building was built
[42:18] many, many decades ago. And there are no records. However,
[42:21] it has existed since about the 80s. Um, and so
[42:24] most of them is just preserving the existing condition and
[42:29] addressing, um, what's necessary for the proposed edition. So I'm
[42:33] happy to go through them or I can just answer
[42:34] any questions of committee. Thank you. Committee members, have any
[42:39] questions or comments. Sorry. Town Platten, Desert. President New Referees.
[42:48] Good afternoon. Mr. Chair, members of Committee. My name is
[42:51] Yvette George Community Planner with the Town of Caledon. I
[42:54] do have new information to present today. I do want
[42:56] to note that pages five and six on schedule C
[43:00] have been included in an air and will be removed
[43:02] in the post agenda. Okay. Thank you. Uh, Committee members,
[43:11] have any questions or comments. Remember? Sorry. Schedule D the
[43:21] conditions or schedule C. So I didn't know. Through the
[43:25] chair scheduled seat. There are comments that do not pertain
[43:29] to this application. Comments, schedule C. Okay. Any other questions
[43:39] or comments for committee members. I'm a French. Through you
[43:47] chair to the delegate here. Um, how many employees will
[43:51] be at this building working at this building. So there's
[43:56] nine full - time employees at any given time. Um,
[43:59] the reason for, so that would base on our traffic
[44:03] assessment assumed nine parking spaces at the maximum time that
[44:07] they would be used. The remaining 15 is for visitors
[44:10] to the site which would primarily be architects, engineers, um,
[44:15] potential purchasers. Um, the traffic study does support based on
[44:20] the nine employees. Thank you. So two in the warehouse
[44:23] and seven in the office. Thank you. Do you any
[44:27] other questions or comments from committee members. Member DeCarlo. Jury
[44:35] to the applicant. So current use of the building is
[44:40] what. It's currently a warehouse and has a very small
[44:44] office component at the front. Um, the existing office at
[44:48] the front is going to be demolished to make way
[44:50] for a three - story edition. Which is a combination
[44:53] of office and warehouse. Okay. The same use of the
[44:56] same type of business use. Same business. It's the same
[45:02] owner that's existing on the property. Uh, the office space
[45:05] is going to contain, um, a large, large boardroom areas,
[45:10] some areas for staff members that attend the site for
[45:13] site meetings. Um, but it's a full office use. Okay.
[45:19] Propose use of storage at rear. What, what is the
[45:21] intended of that? The outdoor storage at the rear, which
[45:27] is blue on the screen is existing and permitted. And
[45:32] what's that. Uh, it's outdoor storage of it is a
[45:36] forming company. There's a lot of concrete forming. So it's
[45:39] equipment used for the construction process and completed material. Okay.
[45:46] Okay. No further questions. Thank you. Any other questions committee
[45:52] members. Comments. I see none. Oh, I see none. Uh,
[45:58] Secretary's name registered to delegate this application. Through the chair,
[46:02] the town has not received any requests from members of
[46:04] the public to speak to the application. Any members in
[46:08] the public council chambers wanting to speak on this application.
[46:12] C none. Now move on to a motion for decision
[46:15] regarding this matter. It's a reminder to Committee attached to
[46:17] staff report as schedule D draft conditions. Do I have
[46:20] a mover secondary, please? Number bowl. Jim be approved subject
[46:26] to the conditions and scheduled the staff report. Thank you.
[46:29] Secondar please. Member French. Any questions discussion on the motion.
[46:35] See non callable member bowl in favor. Member to Carlo
[46:39] in favor. French in favor. Aber Coney in favor. I'm
[46:45] Rasodi. In favor. I'm also in favor for the record
[46:48] of motion has carried and has been approved with the
[46:51] second conditions to the applicant. You could now remove the
[46:54] sign. Thank you very much. Moving on to Application A
[46:57] 04 - 2 - 26 located at zero Highway 50.
[47:02] With the applicant or agent, please introduce yourself presenting new
[47:05] information. Uh, go ahead, Daniel. Uh, hello. Good day committee
[47:13] members, uh, staff and, uh, members of the public. Do
[47:19] I have access to the camera? Or is it, uh,
[47:25] yeah, you need to share something. No, I was just
[47:28] wondering if, uh, because, um, because, um, if the camera
[47:31] was working, but I guess it's okay. I don't think
[47:34] you can see me, but it's okay. If you could
[47:35] hear me, that should be sufficient. We can't see you.
[47:39] We just, we can hear you, but I think that's
[47:41] on your end more than ours. Okay. Um, just give
[47:47] me one second. We have a, we do have a
[47:51] plan that we can, she's ready to share the site
[47:55] plan. Okay.
[48:08] Perfect. Um. Just so yeah, so my name is Daniel
[48:13] Branzia. I'm here from Smart Center's REIT. And we own
[48:18] the property at, uh, the Southeast corner of Healy Road
[48:23] and Highway 50. It's vacant lands. Um, but we are
[48:27] developing it right now with two additional retail units, uh,
[48:31] it will be an expansion to the existing smart centres
[48:35] Bolton. Uh, shopping centre. And, um, we are now going
[48:40] through site plan approval and designing the site. And the
[48:44] reason why we're here is to ask the committee if
[48:47] we could reduce the parking space setback. To Highway 50
[48:52] from nine metres to two metres. To seven metres, sorry.
[48:55] Nine metres to seven metres. And, um, the associated planting
[49:01] strip, the landscape planting strip from nine metres to seven
[49:05] metres as well. Uh, overall a two metre reduction. The
[49:10] reason is because, um, originally just for some background information
[49:16] on this file. Originally, we were providing about 10 metres
[49:20] set back to Highway 50 for the parking and for
[49:24] the landscaping. However, uh, through the site plan approval process,
[49:29] which we're going through now, the region of peel has
[49:33] requested a road widening. So they would like to take,
[49:37] uh, approximately 2. 44 metres along the frontage of the
[49:40] property, which basically puts us a little bit short of
[49:44] the zoning requirement. So it wasn't an intentional design by
[49:50] us. It was a requirement to meet peel regions Road
[49:53] Widening standards. And so we are going to, um, provide
[50:01] some enhanced landscaping along a regional Route 50. It's going
[50:05] to look really great when it's built out and done
[50:08] lots of trees and bushes and native species. Uh, the
[50:12] public realm is going to look really nice. And, um,
[50:16] ultimately this would really only affect 17 parking stalls, uh,
[50:20] along Highway 50, as you can see at the, at
[50:22] the bottom of the plan, uh, which is the only
[50:26] Parkinson's be affected. And, uh, everything else would, would, would
[50:30] match the existing shopping centre and the overall design. So
[50:33] we, we hope that the committee. Will support our request.
[50:36] And if you have any questions, uh, please let me
[50:39] know. Thank you. Thank you very much. Uh, talent doesn't
[50:44] planner. Please introduce yourself through your chair to the committee.
[50:49] Good afternoon. Chris Bean planner with the town of Caledon.
[50:51] I have no further information to add. Thank you. Members
[50:56] of the committee, have any questions or comments, concerns. I
[51:01] see none. Secretary Treasure, has anyone registered delegate to this
[51:05] application. Through the chair to town has not received any
[51:09] requests from members of the public to speak to the
[51:12] application. Thank you. Any members of the public council chambers
[51:16] have any questions or comments on the Application. C none.
[51:22] We'll now move on to a motion for decision regarding
[51:24] this matter. Do I have a mover in Secondary, please?
[51:26] Memorable. Application be approved. Secondary member French. Thank you. Any
[51:36] questions or discussion on the motion. Is the nine call
[51:41] a vote member? In favor. To Carlo. In favor. I'm
[51:45] a French member. Member Coney in favor. Member Sodi. And
[51:49] favor. I'm also in favor for the record. Emulsion has
[51:52] carry. This matter has been approved to the African Please
[51:54] Remove the sign. Great. Thank you. Thanks. Have a good
[51:59] day. Bye bye. Moving to Application A 048 - 26
[52:04] located at 41 Barry Down Drive. Would the Applicant or
[52:09] Agent introduce yourself presenting new information. Good afternoon.
[52:19] Um, I'm the Applicat on behalf of the homeowners. And
[52:22] the new information. Today. Thank you. Uh, Town doesn't it,
[52:27] planner. Please introduce yourself for sending you information. Through the
[52:30] chair, Cindy Juba, planning technician. I have no new information
[52:33] to provide. Thank you Committee members. Any questions or comments
[52:38] on the application. C9. Secretary has a registered delegate to
[52:45] this application. Through the chair, the town has not received
[52:49] any requests from members of the public to speak to
[52:51] the application. Did you have. It? Yep. Memorable. Question? Yeah.
[52:57] I said I didn't see your hand. Sorry, I missed
[52:59] it. Um, a question to the applicant. Has this addition
[53:05] already been constructed? Yes. Yes, it has. Without a building
[53:10] permit. That's correct.
[53:23] Any other questions or comments? C. None. Ball. Okay.
[53:33] Um, are there any members in the public? Did I
[53:37] ask you a little? No, I have not. No. Secretary
[53:42] Treasure. Is anyone? We did that, yeah. Aaron, you want
[53:45] to council Chambers have any concerns or comments on the
[53:48] Application. See none, but I'll move on to a motion
[53:53] for a decision regarding this matter. Do I have a
[53:54] mover in secondary, please? Member Sodi. I moved out the
[53:58] application be approved subject to the schedule's DNE. Thank you,
[54:05] Secondar, please. Remember, Coney, thank you. Any questions or discussion
[54:13] on the motion. I see none. We now call a
[54:17] vote, member bull. In. Favor. Thank you. Remember to Carlo.
[54:27] In favor. Of a French. Favor. Remember Coney in favor.
[54:34] Our sodi. In favor. I'm also in favor for the
[54:37] record. This motion is carried. As matter has been approved
[54:39] with the second dish. Thanks. You can now remove the
[54:43] sign too, please. Thank you. Thanks. Uh, moving on to
[54:46] Application 8. Yeah. Yeah. Sorry. So this is the second
[54:54] application that's come before us today. That has already been
[54:59] built, already been done. And then they're coming and asking
[55:02] for forgiveness. I don't know, like what are the consequences?
[55:08] Is it okay for everyone to just go build and
[55:10] then come and see us? And, you know, if they
[55:12] do it within the specs, it's okay. I don't think
[55:15] this is right. You memorable. But I'd like to staff
[55:22] to report back to us on what the consequence is,
[55:26] uh, the town. In terms of law and policy on
[55:29] people who build without building permit. Like to know that.
[55:33] There has to be a consequence, right? All right. Thank
[55:41] you. Um, moving on to application A 50 - 26
[55:48] located at 28 McFal Street. With the applicant or agent,
[55:53] please introduce yourself in presenting your information on the Application.
[56:03] Good afternoon. I am John Vanderwald. The agent for Michel
[56:08] Payne here, the resident. At 28 McFaul and homeowner. We
[56:15] don't have anything too much to add other than there
[56:19] was a complaint lodged by the one neighbour at 22
[56:25] McFal. Do I respond to that now or after she
[56:29] has spoken? Maybe after she's a registered speaker today. So
[56:34] maybe after she, once she comments, then you can. Thanks,
[56:39] John. Thank you. Would the town planner yourself presenting a
[56:46] new information? Through the chair, Yvette George Community Planner. I
[56:51] have no new information to provide. Thank you. Do the
[56:54] members of committee have any questions or comments. Remember.
[57:04] Con. Uh, yes through the chair to the applicant. The
[57:11] complaint we received by the neighbour does seem legitimate. It
[57:18] is going to take a lot out of his views
[57:21] of his windows. So I have a concern about that.
[57:29] Do you want me to respond to that? Yes, please.
[57:32] Okay. Um. On the property survey that Michelle has had
[57:39] done, okay. Um, the neighbor's house is 1. 2 metres.
[57:46] From the property line. This is an open carport, okay?
[57:52] And it's proposed to be one metre away as well.
[57:57] So do that in English, uh, okay. It's seven foot
[58:02] four away from the property line. Um. So it's still
[58:09] a fair distance away. Okay.
[58:19] And it is an open car part. She parks her
[58:22] car there already. So all you're going to see is
[58:25] a little bit of the roof. Uh, in the area
[58:30] photos, we can see a temporary graduate. That has been
[58:34] removed. That has been removed. And that was actually right
[58:38] on the property line. Okay. That was actually placed right
[58:41] on the property. Yeah. That has been removed. A while
[58:46] ago already. Okay. Okay. So it's not, it's not there.
[58:50] It's not there now. No, it's not. No. Okay. So
[58:53] it will be less, we're a metre further away than
[58:57] that. Uh, temporary carport was. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Thank
[59:05] you. Any other questions or comments from committee members? C9.
[59:13] Secretary. Memorable. Maybe for the applicant.
[59:25] When I look on that street, there are no other
[59:28] garages in the location that you are proposing them. A
[59:32] lot of people park in their front yard. Are they
[59:34] have garages in their backyard. So it's not covering up
[59:38] other people's windows. Have you contemplated putting something in your
[59:43] backyard. So it's not, so it isn't adjacent to your
[59:48] neighbor's windows. Should I speak for us? Yeah, you can
[59:51] speak there, Michelle. Do the chair? Yeah, just state your
[59:55] name, please. Michelle Payne, homeowner of 28 McFall Street. Of
[1:00:01] the 11 properties on 28 McFarland McFaul. Street. 367 of
[1:00:11] them. Have garages. One is technically on judge. They all
[1:00:15] have garages that were either set back. Or attached within
[1:00:21] the house. Even the complaint of, um, 22 has a
[1:00:27] garage setback. The layout of my property, unfortunately does not
[1:00:34] allow me to make a garage. Set back behind my
[1:00:39] house. Due to the way it was built prior to
[1:00:43] my purchasing of it in 2022. If I was to
[1:00:46] put a garage further back, I would be taken down
[1:00:51] too many trees and disturbing too much of a landscape.
[1:00:57] The other houses that Mrs. Mc O'Grady has indicated in
[1:01:02] her complaint package of not having garages. The one right
[1:01:08] north of me, which is number 36. Their property, their
[1:01:14] house takes up the whole width of their property. It's
[1:01:19] a two - story red brick house. And they're parking
[1:01:21] is all in front of their house. From one side
[1:01:25] of the property to the other. The house next to
[1:01:29] that, number 38 is a grey house, one and a
[1:01:33] half story. To the north of their house, they have
[1:01:38] availability to build a garage or a cardboard. If they
[1:01:43] so desire. Their driveway to the right of their house
[1:01:48] also can accommodate multiple cars. She also included a picture
[1:01:53] of number two George Street, where there's no parking, no
[1:01:59] garage. But there is an old barn that's been on
[1:02:01] the property for over 100 years. That if they chose
[1:02:05] to, they can park in. But that property's driveway is
[1:02:10] very much to the east of the house, and they
[1:02:12] can accommodate multiple cars. I would. Like to have this
[1:02:18] lean to just to protect my vehicles from the elements.
[1:02:23] When I had that temporary carport on my driveway, I
[1:02:27] had not heard one issue from the Mrs. Oedy regarding
[1:02:34] it. It also stood at eight feet tall. There was
[1:02:39] no complaints through the bylaws regarding that to my knowledge.
[1:02:44] So four years of that being structured there. She did
[1:02:48] not say anything to me. And, um, only now is
[1:02:53] she bringing up an issue with me wanting to put
[1:02:57] this lean to in this comfort. Okay. Thank you so
[1:03:03] much for that. Thank you. Memorable. So a question maybe
[1:03:09] to your consultant. When I look at the pictures of
[1:03:12] the lean - to that you had there, it was.
[1:03:17] Below the height of the windows on the adjacent property.
[1:03:22] Um. So how, when I look at your plans, I
[1:03:30] think the roof of the carport is higher than that.
[1:03:36] I'm wondering, is there, would it make a difference. If
[1:03:41] you reduce the height of the carport roof? Cause that's
[1:03:47] really the issue. And if so, would it change the
[1:03:51] effect on the neighbours. So excuse me, you're asking to
[1:03:57] reduce the height over at the closest to 22 McFal
[1:04:02] then. Is that what you're asking? Uh, to the south.
[1:04:11] Yeah. Or. Yeah, to decrease the height overall. Would it
[1:04:17] make a difference. Um. Right? Because when I will look
[1:04:26] at the lien to the, I don't know what you
[1:04:28] call it, the fabric one. It wasn't as high. It
[1:04:33] was considerably lower than what you're proposing. So it wouldn't
[1:04:38] have the same impact. What you're proposing now, what have
[1:04:41] it's more significant impact on the neighbours? Not necessarily. No,
[1:04:48] because don't forget that carport was right at the property
[1:04:52] line. Okay. And it did have, um. Michelle has a
[1:04:57] picture of it there. I may present. I have a
[1:05:00] picture. I'm looking at a picture of it right now
[1:05:02] on Google Maps. Okay. Are you looking at this picture
[1:05:04] here? Absolutely. I'm looking at. A car in it, but
[1:05:08] I'm looking at it. That centre peak of that temporary
[1:05:17] carport. Stood eight feet tall. And. That and her windows,
[1:05:25] how tall are her windows from the ground? Her windows
[1:05:28] are about eight feet off the ground. Cause I, I
[1:05:32] was just over there. Uh, this morning and took a
[1:05:35] look. And to the windowsill, it's just under eight feet
[1:05:39] to the window sill because she's got three rolls of
[1:05:41] block, which is two feet. Then the floor level. And
[1:05:44] then, then the window above that. So this, I've also
[1:05:53] did a, um, a bit of a sketch where. The
[1:06:01] sunlight would come. Number one, it's facing north by northwest.
[1:06:07] Okay. So you don't get a lot of sunlight from
[1:06:09] that anyways. Okay. But I took a shadow line from
[1:06:13] the peak of the main house. I don't know how
[1:06:16] I can show this to you other than pass it
[1:06:20] round. Um, I took a line from here. If you
[1:06:24] can see it down to the edge of the roof
[1:06:29] and down further. Okay. Can you see that. That there
[1:06:34] is 5'11, which would be at her house. Her windows
[1:06:38] are way higher than that. Okay. Okay. So it would
[1:06:43] not really. So the car report was higher. The original.
[1:06:48] Those freestanding carport was higher. It was higher. In the
[1:06:53] middle. It's a peak. Was a peak. Not at the
[1:06:56] end at the where it was adjacent to a property,
[1:07:01] how high it was. It wasn't, it wasn't the peak
[1:07:02] of it. Right? It was six feet at the side.
[1:07:11] Six feet to eight feet. It would have been, uh,
[1:07:18] right about here. Okay. Which is the property line. That's
[1:07:22] where the current port was. So it's, it's really not
[1:07:27] appreciably higher. And what's your proposing by look on your
[1:07:30] site plan. Just so that I know is eight feet,
[1:07:36] eight inches. To. To talk of the beam. Top of
[1:07:42] the beam with the top of the roof being higher.
[1:07:47] Right? Yeah. Okay. Do you want to lower. It. Like
[1:07:52] a foot? Yeah. I mean, if, if it, if it
[1:07:56] makes it, uh, more palatable to council, we can lower
[1:08:00] that by a foot if you like. But we need
[1:08:04] room for Michelle still to be able to walk under
[1:08:07] and clean her car and et cetera. Right. Understand that.
[1:08:10] Yeah. Like we can increase the slope of that roof
[1:08:12] and drop it. Drop it a foot if that would,
[1:08:15] uh, appease. Counsel. We're open to that. Okay. Thank you.
[1:08:22] Thank you. Okay. Any other commit questions? Remember DiCarlo. Sorry.
[1:08:28] And members through you, Chair. Um. Just working through some
[1:08:33] of the technical aspects of this. I mean, he's typically,
[1:08:36] typically these three metre access ways were provided for these
[1:08:41] types of communities to allow for a rear yard access
[1:08:44] of a car or a garage or some sort. And
[1:08:48] that's the reason why they kept these three metre side
[1:08:50] yards just to allow you to do that. If you
[1:08:53] wanted to. And that was the, that was way the
[1:08:57] zoning was written at the time. Fast forward to today,
[1:09:03] if we were to look at this as an accesser
[1:09:05] structure, the only reason why this is here today and
[1:09:09] we're asking for this one metre is because it's attached
[1:09:11] to the house. That's the only reason. If it wasn't
[1:09:13] attached to the house, this structure could stay at one
[1:09:17] metre without a problem. And we wouldn't have this meeting
[1:09:19] here today at all. It's just because it's right tied
[1:09:22] to the house. And, um, so I think by reducing
[1:09:27] the height by a foot, um, is it going to
[1:09:30] help anything? You still have a root surface. You're going
[1:09:33] to look at when you look out the window. Regardless.
[1:09:36] Um, as you slope and upwards, um, I mean, the
[1:09:40] only thing that I can suggest here is I don't
[1:09:42] know why we have this huge, uh, overhang on the
[1:09:46] outside of it. I'm assuming that the one metre is
[1:09:52] to the, to the post, not to the, not to
[1:09:55] the soffit. Am I correcting that assumption. Yeah. Yes, you
[1:09:59] are correct. So it's to the soffit. It's not to
[1:10:02] the post? No, it's to the, uh, post. Okay. So,
[1:10:06] you know, possible reduction. Most definitely would, you know, would
[1:10:10] be the best thing to do is try to reduce
[1:10:11] that overhang. I don't think you needed that large. You
[1:10:16] can, you know, get it to a six inches and
[1:10:18] do what you need to do. You're already sitting at
[1:10:20] eight, eight foot eight. Um, to the underside of the
[1:10:24] soffit. But that structure that's proposed on top, I can
[1:10:28] guarantee it's going to be a lot thicker than what's
[1:10:30] shown there. Looks like a little piece of two by
[1:10:31] six. That's not going to happen, it's not going to
[1:10:33] work. It's going to have to be a little, probably
[1:10:35] double that size. No, I do. Two by six would
[1:10:39] work for rafters. That pass is building code. Uh, I
[1:10:43] beg to differ on a snow load. I don't think
[1:10:45] you're going to, I don't think you're going to get
[1:10:46] it at one run. When you're dealing with a roof
[1:10:50] load at that slope because that's technically a flat roof.
[1:10:53] Not a slope roof. When you're down less than 412.
[1:10:58] So I think you should relook at those factors. Um,
[1:11:02] so again, um, I don't think, you know, the height
[1:11:05] is an issue here. I think it's more so, you
[1:11:07] know, uh, looking at it in terms of the four
[1:11:09] tests and whether or not it is appropriate for the
[1:11:11] area. You know, in my opinion, I think it does
[1:11:14] meet all the four tests. It's, it's not, uh, it's
[1:11:18] in keeping, uh, with, with what's going on there, what
[1:11:22] was intended to happen. It is, uh, desirable. I don't
[1:11:25] think it's a, you know, we're dealing with a massive
[1:11:27] structure that's taller than the existing house. Um, you know,
[1:11:31] the reasons why this does meet the four tests in
[1:11:34] my opinion. And I don't think, uh, an overall, you
[1:11:37] know, amendment to what's proposed here other than that soffit
[1:11:40] be reduced to six inches potentially. Uh, because you're going
[1:11:43] to have to put a gutter on that edge of
[1:11:45] it just to keep the water from, from sloping off
[1:11:48] and eroding soil anyways. Um, cause it will do that
[1:11:52] at the base. So, um, and erode your footies. So,
[1:11:57] uh, I, I, that's my opinion. I don't, you know,
[1:12:01] I really think that this is a cut and dry
[1:12:03] case regardless of, of, uh, what's been stated today. Thanks.
[1:12:07] Thank you. Member French. Thank you. That was one, one.
[1:12:11] Okay. Thank you. Remember Coney. Um. Sorry. Um, sorry. Yeah.
[1:12:20] Go ahead. Through the chair to member de Carlo, did
[1:12:24] you suggest that it should be reduced by one foot
[1:12:27] the height of it. Uh. No, I suggest to keep
[1:12:31] the height as is, but reduce the overhang beyond the
[1:12:34] post. Um, you see how it's, it seems like it's
[1:12:38] two feet beyond. Uh, I would just go six inches
[1:12:41] after that post. And not intrude more into that one
[1:12:45] metre side yard. Because you're basically sitting, uh, probably a
[1:12:49] foot away from the fence line to her, to her
[1:12:52] sight line. So it's actually pushing it back to the
[1:12:54] post. But the height is already there. I mean, eight
[1:13:00] foot eight. Is a typical garage door height for any
[1:13:04] vehicle. Uh, you know, uh, if the snow on it,
[1:13:09] you know, you can imagine you might lose a few
[1:13:11] inches as it is. So, you know, eight foot eight,
[1:13:13] you're on the bare minimum of, uh, of, of, of
[1:13:16] many types of vehicles. Thank you, member DeCarlo. Uh, yeah,
[1:13:24] we'll get the, okay, any other questions for committee members.
[1:13:27] C9, Secretary of Treasures, anyone registered delegate to supplication. Through
[1:13:32] the chair town has received one request from members of
[1:13:35] the public to speak to the application. They have also
[1:13:37] provided written comment and it was circulated to the committee
[1:13:40] members. Please go ahead and misogrady. Thank you. Sorry about
[1:13:48] that. I was worried you were voting already. No, no,
[1:13:51] you, we had young. Okay. It's okay. Um, I do
[1:13:55] have a prearranged speech here and it might be repetitive
[1:13:58] on some of the stuff, but I'd like to, if
[1:14:00] you can give me the five minutes for that, I
[1:14:02] want to thank you for allowing me the opportunity to
[1:14:04] speak today. My name is Judy Prima and I'm here
[1:14:07] to speak on behalf of my friend Lindo Grady understanding
[1:14:11] how difficult it can be to speak publicly. I have
[1:14:14] offered to help wrote today being a friend of Linda's
[1:14:16] for over 40 years. I will respect your time in
[1:14:19] knowing you have had the opportunity to review the submitted
[1:14:22] opposition statement in advance of the herring. Which in our
[1:14:25] opinion, identify that the minor variants did not comply to
[1:14:28] all the four tests. If I may quickly summarize the
[1:14:32] proposed carport is asking to be a mayor one metre
[1:14:35] from Linda's property rather than the bylaw setback required of
[1:14:39] three metres, though a couple of metres on paper reads
[1:14:42] to be minor and insignificant in reality, each metre counts,
[1:14:47] especially if you consider beyond beyond the property line that
[1:14:51] the current neighbouring house is a mayor one metre from
[1:14:53] the driveway. In addition, we believe the one metre does
[1:14:57] not take into consideration the overhang, which we just confirmed
[1:15:00] today. Which will further negatively affect the natural light coming
[1:15:04] into your windows, where she currently works from home 90
[1:15:08] percent of the time at our dining room table. The
[1:15:11] slope group would become an eyesore in obstructing the view
[1:15:14] from her windows, her bottom window is seven foot high.
[1:15:18] And now she would have to be looking at a
[1:15:20] carport roof line, an overhang and a whole carport roof
[1:15:24] rather than the current open space that she has. With
[1:15:26] the water running off the slope roof directly onto her
[1:15:29] property during heavy rainfalls, which we all know have become
[1:15:32] extreme these days. This could easily flood her basement, which
[1:15:35] she uses as added living space when her children and
[1:15:39] grandchildren visit. Linda has shared that the applicant, Michelle. Uh,
[1:15:44] purchased her home approximately four years ago. And I understand
[1:15:47] that the relationship between Lyndon Michelle, thus far has been
[1:15:51] good and respectful. You know, the carport, for example, six
[1:15:54] foot, Linda's window is seven and it's the peak that
[1:15:56] was eight. So Linda had shared that the applicant, Michelle.
[1:16:00] Purchased her home approximately four years ago. And I understand,
[1:16:05] I think I'm repeating myself that they've had a good,
[1:16:06] good relationship. Linda has lived in her modest home for
[1:16:10] 20 years where she was a sole provider in raising
[1:16:12] her two children. And since become a grandmother, Linda continues
[1:16:16] to work hard to the stay and continues to work
[1:16:18] long hours at her dining room table in hopes of
[1:16:21] looking forward to retirement one day. Over the 20 years
[1:16:25] that Linda has lived there. Prior homeowners approached Linda with
[1:16:28] considering adding a garage or car porch next to her
[1:16:31] home in which she shared her concerns with them. And
[1:16:34] no minor variants application had been submitted until today. Today
[1:16:39] at the new homeowner Michelle in being a respectful neighbour,
[1:16:43] she is. Uh, did text Linda prior to applying to
[1:16:45] the minor variants. Michelle Ascalinda, if she would be opposed
[1:16:49] to the minor variants, explaining that she did not want
[1:16:52] to incur a cost to apply for the minor variants
[1:16:54] and if it was a problem with Linda. She had
[1:16:58] communicated to her prior neighbours share that she was not
[1:17:02] in agreement with building a structure being so close to
[1:17:04] her home. Today, Lind is here before the Committee of
[1:17:08] Adjustments in opposition of the minor variants is noted in
[1:17:11] her submission. And though Linda empathizes why Michelle would like
[1:17:15] a carport, Michelle knowingly purchased a home without a carport.
[1:17:20] Linda will be 65 years old this year. And as
[1:17:22] we all know, a homeowner's large assassin - free retirement
[1:17:26] is their house. In addition to the concerns expressed already,
[1:17:29] the true potential of Linda's resale value of her home
[1:17:33] may not truly be realised. In fact, it could neglectly
[1:17:37] impact her resale value should this variance be approved, in
[1:17:40] that the home's main dining room and bedroom windows would
[1:17:43] have an unsightly obstructed view of a car pour affecting
[1:17:46] the natural light coming into the main living areas. Most
[1:17:50] concerning is the stormwater runoff directly on to Linda's property,
[1:17:54] increasing the risk of the basement flooding, requiring cost of
[1:17:58] remediation, and who's going to pay for this. Today, Linda
[1:18:02] is asking the Committee of Adjustments to please consider all
[1:18:05] the information provided. Please kindly take into consideration the negative
[1:18:10] impact this will have on Linda's quality of life that
[1:18:13] she's enjoyed for the past 20 years. The negative impact
[1:18:16] of Linda's future resale value as she is entering into
[1:18:19] her retirement years. And to respect, remember that Michelle, knowingly
[1:18:23] purchased a home for years ago, that did not have
[1:18:25] a carport. Perhaps a solution today. I'm going to repeat
[1:18:30] what some of you said, in which we ask both
[1:18:32] Michelle and the town of Caledon to consider would be
[1:18:36] an extending the driveway further back into Michelle's yard to
[1:18:40] allow the carport to be built immediately behind Linda and
[1:18:43] Michelle's house. The trees are industries on Linda's property. She
[1:18:47] just mentioned that to me. In addition, the roof slope
[1:18:51] should be reconfigured to ensure water runoff does not come
[1:18:54] directly onto lendus property. This solution would provide to Michelle
[1:18:59] her desired carport and in turn address Linda's concern that
[1:19:03] could actually satisfy both parties and better suit the character
[1:19:06] of the neighbourhood with all the cars and garages being
[1:19:10] set back. Today, Linda's asking the committee to either reject
[1:19:14] the minor variants as submitted for the reasons explained today
[1:19:18] based on the Nugget Impact of the Carport being built
[1:19:21] in such close proximity to her house or to defer
[1:19:25] the decision of the minor variants to allow Michelle in
[1:19:28] her contractor time to redesign the carport and move in
[1:19:32] it back away from between the houses. I would also
[1:19:35] ask if this is an option to move the carport
[1:19:38] back, the Michelle and her contractor consider including Linda prior
[1:19:43] to coming back to the Committee of Adjustments to reassure
[1:19:45] Linda that the stormwater runoff from the roof is being
[1:19:49] addressed. The suggestion could actually address both Michelle's needs and
[1:19:54] Linda's serious concerns in which they both could continue to
[1:19:58] have a good, respectful relationship. And it would maintain the
[1:20:01] character of the neighbourhood. We just want to know if
[1:20:04] this is possible. And we thank you for consideration and
[1:20:07] would be pleased to answer any questions you may have.
[1:20:10] Thank you. Any questions for the, uh, neighbours. C none.
[1:20:20] Thank you so much. Are there any members in the
[1:20:26] public here in Council Chambers? Wanted to speak on this
[1:20:28] application. Uh, yeah, you can comment to the comments yet.
[1:20:36] Right. Thank you for the chair and committee members
[1:20:46] of hearing my refuttal. Just makes you stick to the
[1:20:49] like proposal part of it. Yeah. Thanks. Um. Ms. Ogrady
[1:20:55] claims that a carport roof will hinder her natural light
[1:21:01] coming in through her curtains. In the four years that
[1:21:04] I have lived at this property, these fixed closed windows
[1:21:08] have never, ever seen the curtains drawn in the dining
[1:21:13] room or lifted in the bedroom so that she can
[1:21:16] look out and see. The open space of the side
[1:21:20] of my house. Or former carport. In her suggestion of
[1:21:27] moving the carport backwards neglects the fact that right behind
[1:21:34] the side of my house, there's a hot tub that
[1:21:37] was there previously before I purchased the house. And a
[1:21:41] duck adjacent to the hot tub. The trees and foliage
[1:21:47] I mentioned earlier are on my property. I have the
[1:21:51] people prior to me put in electrical lighting systems through
[1:21:55] the ground to light up portions of the backyard. I
[1:21:59] have a lilac tree. I have two other trees beside
[1:22:02] the lilac. Missile Grady has two very big maple trees
[1:22:08] that are close to our property line. That would take
[1:22:11] down trees if needed to be moving things back. There's
[1:22:17] really no option to move a carport backwards. Into the
[1:22:22] property behind her house and my hips. Considering my house
[1:22:30] goes much further back into my property than her property.
[1:22:36] If mistal grady had asked me, I would have told
[1:22:40] her from the beginning, I have every intention of having
[1:22:44] eave troughs and a downspout into my property so that
[1:22:49] my foliage and property will have water for the trees
[1:22:52] and the shrubs. Also in the text message conversation that
[1:23:00] I sent to Ms. O'Grady on Wednesday, May 13th in
[1:23:04] the afternoon. Stating that I, this is what I intended
[1:23:09] to do. And that I would like to have the
[1:23:12] minor variant applied for. And if she had any problems,
[1:23:17] I said it's an open carport, not closed like a
[1:23:20] garage. Please let me know your response right away as
[1:23:24] I need to submit for the variance. And if you're
[1:23:26] going to have a problem with it for any reason,
[1:23:29] I do not want to waste 2, 700 dollars on
[1:23:32] an application. Thank you so much and have a good
[1:23:35] rest of your day. Her response to me was, hi
[1:23:38] Michelle, thank you for reaching out. And I appreciate your
[1:23:42] following the bylaws, codes and regulations. At the moment, I
[1:23:46] would have to say no, Linda, to which I responded
[1:23:49] saying thank you for getting back to me. I appreciate
[1:23:52] it and I will proceed with the application. On May
[1:23:56] 13th, had she just said yes, I have concerns. I
[1:24:01] don't think this will work for me. We would not
[1:24:04] be wasting our time here. And I would not be
[1:24:06] wasting this gentleman's time and my money on something that
[1:24:11] she was obviously not approving of from the very beginning.
[1:24:18] Yes, I bought a house that did not have a
[1:24:20] garage or a carport. I don't believe four posts in
[1:24:26] a roof. Hinder the look of the neighbourhood. If you
[1:24:30] look at number three, George Street, and I do have
[1:24:35] an image of that, which is right across the street
[1:24:39] for me that I must look at every day, this
[1:24:42] house has not have any siding on it for more
[1:24:45] than 10 years. It has not been finished. I would
[1:24:49] say that would hinder the look of the neighbourhood more
[1:24:52] than four posts and a slight roof slight lean of
[1:24:56] a roof. Okay. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank
[1:25:00] you. Um. Thank you to committee members. Any questions or
[1:25:05] comments? Do the applicant. It's your last fraud. Nope. You
[1:25:11] can be sitting next. Yep. Go ahead. Comment is the,
[1:25:17] uh, applicant mentioned that these would be main windows to
[1:25:21] the bedroom and the dining room. They are smaller windows
[1:25:27] than, so the window at the front, which I'm assuming
[1:25:30] is a dining room according to her letter has a
[1:25:33] large window on the front. That would be the main
[1:25:36] window. This is not blocking a main window. And same
[1:25:40] thing in the bedroom. It's a smaller window facing the
[1:25:44] side, but around the corner, there's also another window which
[1:25:47] is much larger at the back of her house. So
[1:25:50] it's not really blocking. And it's the north side. So.
[1:25:59] Thank you. Day. A minute. Yeah, go ahead to rebottle
[1:26:04] quickly. Two seconds. We just don't, we want to make
[1:26:08] sure this is on the proposal. This is not like
[1:26:10] a neighborly thing. So I understand there's certain concerns. Uh,
[1:26:14] we did hear what your concerns were. We allow you
[1:26:17] to rebuttal their concerns. Um, is there anything new that
[1:26:23] you want to add or is it? I just wanted
[1:26:24] to add that she did say sorry. No, not yes.
[1:26:29] Go ahead. And then the discursins are share curtains. That's
[1:26:32] it. That's all. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. That's more
[1:26:35] personal matter. So thank you everyone. We'll have the comments
[1:26:42] now closed off. So we'll move on to the application.
[1:26:45] There's no members in the public here at Council Schemers.
[1:26:48] I want to speak in the application. We already went
[1:26:50] through that. We will now move on to a motion
[1:26:53] for this decision. Regarding this matter. As a reminder to
[1:26:56] Committee of attached to staff report as schedule D. We're
[1:26:59] draft conditions. Do I have a mover a seconder.
[1:27:10] Move her a second here. Member to cart. Oh, oh.
[1:27:22] My radicar. To approve application 050 - 26. Thank you.
[1:27:29] With conditions. With conditions, with conditions. With detached conditions, yes.
[1:27:35] The seconder, please. A member bull. Why do you hear
[1:27:41] a wind sound. Any questions discussion on the motion. C9.
[1:27:48] Call a vote. Member Bowl. In favor. Member DeCarlo. Favor.
[1:27:53] I'm a French. Member Coney. In favor. Remember Sodir. I'm
[1:27:58] also a favor for the record. The most are now
[1:28:01] as carry. This matter has been approved with secondions. Thank
[1:28:03] you. Moving to A Consent Applications. Application B018 - 26.
[1:28:10] Located at 1 - 10 - King Street. With the
[1:28:17] African or agent, please introduce yourself for presenting you information.
[1:28:21] And yes, thank you. Go ahead. Yes. Stefan. Good afternoon,
[1:28:28] Chair and members of the committee. Does everybody hear me?
[1:28:31] Yeah. Go ahead. Great. Thank you. Uh, my name is
[1:28:34] Stefan Steiku from MHBC Planning. And I'm representing the applicant
[1:28:39] Emmanuel Reformed Church of Bolton. Uh, I don't have a
[1:28:42] presentation today. Uh, given the scope of the application, but
[1:28:44] we'll provide a quick summary to keep it brief. Uh,
[1:28:47] so the Application before the committee seeks consent to establish
[1:28:51] a three metre wide private servicing easement over part three
[1:28:55] of the lens at 110 King Street West in Bolton
[1:28:59] in favor of the adjacent property at 102 King Street
[1:29:03] West. The easement will legally protect an existing water service
[1:29:09] that serves 102 King Street, but crosses the 110 King
[1:29:14] property line before connecting to the municipal. Uh, system within
[1:29:17] the King Street right away. Uh, it might be helpful
[1:29:19] to throw up the, uh, the draft R plan if
[1:29:22] April or if somebody from, from the town has that
[1:29:25] available. But just for the sake of time, I can,
[1:29:28] I can continue, uh, it will. So the, the easement
[1:29:32] will provide the necessary rights to access, inspect, uh, repair
[1:29:37] the existing waterline. Um, and ultimately this easement is required
[1:29:43] as part of clearing conditions, clearing the conditions associated with,
[1:29:47] uh, with the, the previously approved severance of 102 and
[1:29:52] 110, uh, King Street West. So as you can see
[1:29:54] in front of you here, part two would be 102
[1:29:57] King Street West part one would be 110 King Street
[1:30:01] West and part three is the easement. That is the
[1:30:05] subject of this application before you today. Um, so as
[1:30:10] I mentioned, uh, this application directly addresses, uh, three conditions
[1:30:17] from a previous consent application for, for a severance to
[1:30:23] sever these two lots, uh, the application for consent was,
[1:30:27] was approved with conditions. Um, and, you know, we're now
[1:30:31] in the process of clearing those conditions. So we, we
[1:30:33] do have about, um, another couple of months to, to
[1:30:38] finish clearing those conditions. And this did come up. Uh,
[1:30:41] this easement did come up in discussions with region staff.
[1:30:45] We, we had a, um, we had a utility company
[1:30:48] go out and do the locates for all the utilities
[1:30:53] and long story short, they found that, uh, that water
[1:30:56] line crossing over from part two, which is 102 King
[1:30:59] onto part one, which is 110 Kinyon into the right
[1:31:03] of way. Uh, so as with the previous, uh, associated
[1:31:07] consent application, no new servicing development or physical changes to,
[1:31:11] to either property or proposed. The applicant, the application simply
[1:31:15] formalizes the existing servicing array arrangement. So the two properties
[1:31:19] can continue to operate. Uh, independently following the severance. Uh,
[1:31:24] thank you. And I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank
[1:31:30] you. Any other questions, comments for committee members. Town doesn't,
[1:31:37] please introduce yourself presenting information. Through the chair, Giuseppe Russo,
[1:31:41] Community Planner with the Town of Calladin. I have no
[1:31:43] new information at this time. Thank you committee members. None.
[1:31:49] I don't see you online. Okay. Um, Secretary Tresating, we
[1:31:54] registered delegate to this application. Through the chair, the town
[1:31:57] has not received any request from members of the public
[1:31:59] to speak to the application. Members in the public council
[1:32:02] chambers here to speak on me. This application, CNON. We'll
[1:32:07] now move on to a motion for decision regardless matter.
[1:32:10] It was a reminder to this committee attached to staff
[1:32:12] report is schedule F. We're draft conditions. Do I have
[1:32:15] a mover secondary. Member French? I'll move that optician B018
[1:32:21] - 26B approved. Thank you. Secondary, please. Memorable. Subject to
[1:32:28] the conditions in schedule. Subject to the conditions. Thank you,
[1:32:31] Mary. Kate. Is there any more discussion on the motion?
[1:32:37] Not C9. We'll call a vote, member bull. Favor. Member
[1:32:42] to Carlo. In favor. Number French. In favor. Remember Coney.
[1:32:47] In favor. Mersodi in favor. I'm also in favor for
[1:32:50] the record of the motion. As carry this matter has
[1:32:52] been approved with the second distance. The applicant you can
[1:32:54] now remove the sign. Thank you. Thank you. Moving to
[1:32:59] Application B020 - 26 located at 1 - 2 -
[1:33:05] 1 - 0 - 0 Credit View Road with the
[1:33:08] Applicant or Agent Pleasant Juice Yourself and present any new
[1:33:10] information on the Application. Sebastian from RCI on behalf of
[1:33:17] landowner. I do not have any new information. Thank you.
[1:33:20] Thank you. Would the Town Planner doesn't introduce you presenting
[1:33:24] new information. Through the chair. Tanja Dropball Senior Planner and
[1:33:30] I have no new information. Thank you members of Community.
[1:33:33] Any questions or comments. Sinan Secretary Chair, has anyone registered
[1:33:39] deadlike his application. Through the chair, the town has not
[1:33:42] received any requests from the members of the public to
[1:33:44] speak to the application. Any members of the public account's
[1:33:48] chambers here wanting to speak on this application. C none.
[1:33:51] We now move on to a motion for the decision
[1:33:53] regardless. Matter as a reminder to the committee, attach to
[1:33:55] the staff report is scheduled E or draft conditions. Do
[1:33:59] I have a mover secondary? Member Coney. Yep. In the
[1:34:06] comments from, sorry, through the chair to staff. I noticed
[1:34:09] that the real T - Services are asking for road
[1:34:13] widening and long entire credit view Road frontage, but I
[1:34:17] don't see that as a condition. Through the chair, so
[1:34:22] realty services, their position is whenever there's an application, they
[1:34:26] would like to receive road widening. Road widening would have
[1:34:30] been through the previous consent, but we informed them that
[1:34:34] it's going to be through the future draft plan, a
[1:34:37] subdivision that's coming in. Um, so it's a future application.
[1:34:41] It's still their comments. I included it. We will get
[1:34:44] the widening that we need. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
[1:34:49] Um, so the motions on the table, second. We don't
[1:34:54] have. A member. Oh, can I have a motion, please?
[1:34:58] I moved to the Application be approved subject to the
[1:35:00] conditions set out and scheduled to the staff report. Secondar,
[1:35:03] please. Member Coleman. Thank you. Uh, any questions or discussion
[1:35:08] on the motion? See none. Um, we'll now call a
[1:35:15] boat. Member Bull. In favor. To Carlo. In favor. Remember
[1:35:21] French. In favor. Member Coney. In favor. Minnesota. In favor.
[1:35:25] I'm also in favor of the record of the motion
[1:35:27] has carry. This matter has been approved with the second
[1:35:30] distance and, uh, to the Applicant, you can remove the
[1:35:32] sign. This concludes the August 12, 2026 Committee Adjustment here.
[1:35:36] I declare the hearing adjourn. Thank you.