1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,720 I'd like 2 00:00:47,580 --> 00:00:52,360 to call the meeting of the Carpenterry Valley Water District to order. Can we head a pleas of release, please? 3 00:00:54,510 --> 00:01:04,250 Pleas of allegiance to the flag in the United States of America, and to the Republic for its assands, one nation, and the God, indivisible liberty of justice for all. 4 00:01:04,250 --> 00:01:06,830 No, roll call, please Lisa. 5 00:01:09,500 --> 00:01:10,480 Director O'Connor? 6 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:11,840 Director Holcomb? 7 00:01:12,700 --> 00:01:13,220 Director Volts? 8 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:14,220 Director Robert? 9 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:15,780 Director Van Wiggen. 10 00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:16,240 Yes. 11 00:01:16,480 --> 00:01:17,100 Five present. 12 00:01:18,540 --> 00:01:19,980 Number three, public forum. 13 00:01:20,320 --> 00:01:22,720 Any person may address the board of directors on any matter. 14 00:01:23,260 --> 00:01:25,860 Business jurisdiction, which is not on the agenda. 15 00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:27,500 Done. 16 00:01:30,500 --> 00:01:31,900 There we go, too. 17 00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:37,360 You got him on the speaker? 18 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:41,960 Do you want us to get the GZ? 19 00:01:42,500 --> 00:01:43,520 No problem. 20 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:47,960 Cassinda, agenda number four. 21 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:55,580 I'll read to all items and if anybody's got any questions or comments and then we'll approve it all at once. 22 00:01:56,560 --> 00:02:01,100 So for a minutes of the regular board meeting held on January 8th, 2025. 23 00:02:01,320 --> 00:02:02,460 Probably abstaining. 24 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:04,600 Thank you. 25 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:08,900 And the Spursman Report for November 11, 2024, December 10, 26 00:02:10,920 --> 00:02:10,920 2025. 27 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:14,400 And semi-annual of Enderman Payment Report. 28 00:02:15,780 --> 00:02:19,460 Then for the Directed Quarterly Composation Report, second quarter. 29 00:02:20,380 --> 00:02:26,400 And then for E, consider authorizing scope and budget change for Hemner and Jewel, 30 00:02:26,460 --> 00:02:31,540 a real property consultant for CAP in the amount of the 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. 31 00:02:31,540 --> 00:02:36,540 Okay, if there's no questions or comments, then I like emotion please. 32 00:02:37,220 --> 00:02:42,160 One of our, um, I believe we do have a public comment 33 00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:46,640 online. 34 00:02:56,150 --> 00:02:58,570 Oh, there was no, there was no comment on the, okay. 35 00:03:00,170 --> 00:03:02,910 So I think I know the way I thought you were, I thought that would be this one too. 36 00:03:03,410 --> 00:03:09,270 Yeah, and then do we want to take the minutes separately since there's going to be an abstention? 37 00:03:09,710 --> 00:03:12,870 Okay, got it. Okay, so we got item number four A. 38 00:03:12,870 --> 00:03:14,950 We need a motion please. 39 00:03:15,550 --> 00:03:18,530 Second, motion is second, any more discussion? 40 00:03:19,210 --> 00:03:20,050 Roll call, please. 41 00:03:20,570 --> 00:03:21,310 Director Conner. 42 00:03:22,070 --> 00:03:22,730 Director Holcomb. 43 00:03:23,130 --> 00:03:23,330 Absi. 44 00:03:23,730 --> 00:03:24,410 Director Bolts. 45 00:03:24,910 --> 00:03:25,010 Aye. 46 00:03:25,170 --> 00:03:25,470 Director Robert. 47 00:03:26,230 --> 00:03:26,930 Director Van Wingerdin. 48 00:03:27,030 --> 00:03:27,490 Yes. 49 00:03:27,750 --> 00:03:28,990 Motion passes four one. 50 00:03:29,430 --> 00:03:31,170 Okay, then we got four B. 51 00:03:31,410 --> 00:03:36,850 Disbursement report from November 11, 2024 to December 10, 2025. 52 00:03:37,470 --> 00:03:42,670 And at the point in the other point of order, there's a correction, it should be December 10, 2024. 53 00:03:43,290 --> 00:03:43,850 Thank you. 54 00:03:44,450 --> 00:03:46,610 I should have had a couple of things. 55 00:03:47,670 --> 00:03:52,370 Can I move through a top BCD and E it once now that we've subtracted it? 56 00:03:52,390 --> 00:03:52,610 Yes. 57 00:03:52,890 --> 00:03:53,730 So moved. 58 00:03:54,650 --> 00:03:54,770 Second. 59 00:03:56,550 --> 00:03:58,150 You're talking about B right now, right? 60 00:03:58,330 --> 00:04:00,430 I moved to a top B through E. 61 00:04:01,190 --> 00:04:01,570 Got it. 62 00:04:01,970 --> 00:04:03,230 So we're going to motion this second. 63 00:04:03,490 --> 00:04:04,430 Any more discussion? 64 00:04:05,470 --> 00:04:06,170 Roll call please. 65 00:04:06,170 --> 00:04:10,370 Director O'Connor. Director Holcomb. Yes. Director Bold. 66 00:04:10,810 --> 00:04:11,730 Director Roberts. 67 00:04:11,890 --> 00:04:12,330 Hi. 68 00:04:12,410 --> 00:04:13,290 Director Ranweer Dyn. 69 00:04:13,350 --> 00:04:13,790 Yes. 70 00:04:14,050 --> 00:04:15,050 Motion passes 50. 71 00:04:16,290 --> 00:04:17,730 Then, uh, unfinished business. 72 00:04:19,290 --> 00:04:21,850 Then we adjourned the regular meeting of the Crop to be a groundwater 73 00:04:21,850 --> 00:04:23,450 sustainability agency. 74 00:04:28,070 --> 00:04:29,450 Called the meeting to order. 75 00:04:30,390 --> 00:04:32,470 Uh, item number two public forum. 76 00:04:32,810 --> 00:04:35,090 Any person may address the border directors on any matter. 77 00:04:35,150 --> 00:04:38,190 Business is jurisdiction, which is not on the agenda. 78 00:04:39,500 --> 00:04:40,720 Yes, sir. 79 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:41,440 Yes, sir. 80 00:04:46,260 --> 00:04:46,760 Go ahead. 81 00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:48,420 Hello, everyone. 82 00:04:49,200 --> 00:04:49,400 Hi. 83 00:04:50,620 --> 00:04:57,640 I wanted to just come as a follow up from the last meeting when presented a letter from the 84 00:04:57,640 --> 00:05:01,260 volunteer members of the advisory committee. 85 00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:07,580 I wanted to see if you had any questions about that and also looking forward to the 86 00:05:07,580 --> 00:05:13,600 discussion about that we're going to have with the committee as a follow-on from the last meeting. 87 00:05:14,500 --> 00:05:31,780 So, I just wanted to mention that, and one other follow up is that it sent in a piece to the coastal view, following up on that letter, just describing some of the nature-based groundwater recharge opportunities here in the basin. 88 00:05:31,940 --> 00:05:36,400 And one should know about that, and not sure when it'll run, but you'll be seeing it at some point. 89 00:05:37,540 --> 00:05:37,900 I'm sure. 90 00:05:39,500 --> 00:05:58,240 I'll just say we are working on the outreach plan for the meter program, and so that's kind of as my rock recollection was that there was sort of a two track discussion. 91 00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:06,240 At the last GSA meeting, one was what Alan is talking about, and that is to reassemble the 92 00:06:06,980 --> 00:06:16,720 just back to work on grants under Prop4 and any other grants that might be available for projects that the GSA would do. 93 00:06:16,980 --> 00:06:26,360 The other was, I think, maybe it was Scott mentioning that the meter piece that we were working on, the policy that 94 00:06:26,360 --> 00:06:33,080 on Scott mentioned, or maybe the GSPAC should be consulted on that, and so we are working 95 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:38,900 on that piece. We haven't gotten to the piece that Alan is talking about, so we'll bring 96 00:06:38,900 --> 00:06:41,620 back in the future, both of those. 97 00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:42,940 All right. Thank you. 98 00:06:43,280 --> 00:06:43,320 Okay. 99 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:47,580 I'll just, I guess, add a comment. I think we're super fortunate to have these guys willing 100 00:06:47,580 --> 00:06:52,180 to step in and help out in any way they can and what that might look like is probably something 101 00:06:52,180 --> 00:06:56,340 you guys have to figure out if there's, you know, some value to it, I think there could be. 102 00:06:56,460 --> 00:07:01,120 It's great to have a group that knows and understands what the GSA is and is willing to, 103 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:05,480 you know, they could certainly be advocates for it or, you know, be great resources to get in touch 104 00:07:05,480 --> 00:07:09,920 with those in the community, you know, in their kind of neighborhood. So I'm sorry, I appreciate 105 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:15,260 you guys being willing to step up and, you know, I'm sure we'll make something work out, I hope. 106 00:07:15,720 --> 00:07:20,500 I'm sure we will. I'll add that, I've said many, many times during, I guess it was last year, 107 00:07:20,500 --> 00:07:24,700 last year and a half. This is one of those talented group people. I think we've ever had ever 108 00:07:24,700 --> 00:07:30,180 put to work, and it was absolute honor. If it's resurrected, I'm sure it would be, 109 00:07:30,220 --> 00:07:34,120 I think, there's some good things that we can do. I do want to see it in specifics. I do think 110 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:39,800 that the more specific the task and the mission, the better. I'm not open-ended and Alan with regard to 111 00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:44,280 your piece. I remember you coming in here several months ago saying, hey, we've got, you know, 112 00:07:44,320 --> 00:07:49,320 I can do this, we have resources, we can get off into kind of see where we can do with respect to 113 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:54,780 in the weeks and that kind of thing so I haven't seen feedback on that yet I'm not sure if 114 00:07:54,780 --> 00:07:58,420 that's something that could be rolled into the committee but rather kind of what's the status 115 00:07:58,420 --> 00:08:03,540 of that as we go forward and then depending on that status is there's some kind of criteria 116 00:08:03,540 --> 00:08:08,520 that could be folded and I don't know. I support the whole team that was here before the 117 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:14,780 fantastic group echo everything that Casey is saying but I think the CRISPR, the assignments, 118 00:08:14,780 --> 00:08:15,760 the better. 119 00:08:18,250 --> 00:08:22,250 Okay then Bob, you're going to read Will Carthons letter into the record. 120 00:08:23,890 --> 00:08:26,930 This is an item further down, I believe. 121 00:08:32,180 --> 00:08:35,780 Oh, this is actually an item on the 122 00:08:35,780 --> 00:08:44,100 CVWD. So it's on the, on the, the waterboard, not, not yet. Okay, got it. Okay. I'm not sure why it's 123 00:08:44,100 --> 00:08:49,840 okay. Yeah, it's a cap. It's a cap related. Yeah, got it. Okay. 124 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:50,580 Thank you. 125 00:08:50,580 --> 00:08:50,900 All right. 126 00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:51,380 Shoot it. 127 00:08:52,540 --> 00:08:56,120 May I make one point of clarification? 128 00:08:59,730 --> 00:09:00,770 Scott Bandercar. 129 00:09:01,330 --> 00:09:05,770 I picked up this handout which is a couple new water district on the front and then right 130 00:09:05,770 --> 00:09:07,810 over on the back is the GSA. 131 00:09:08,390 --> 00:09:12,510 Is this a combination or a combined report or is it all GSA? 132 00:09:13,110 --> 00:09:17,050 This is the slide deck, so this slides up here. 133 00:09:17,510 --> 00:09:20,750 Thank you for reminding me not to have it loaded a month. 134 00:09:20,750 --> 00:09:32,670 This is a slide deck that is for tonight's so we start with the board meeting the CVW and then we open the GSA meeting so it is a combination of the two meetings. 135 00:09:33,110 --> 00:09:34,270 It is yes. 136 00:09:34,270 --> 00:09:35,130 Thank you. 137 00:09:35,150 --> 00:09:36,710 But I need to load that right now. 138 00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:51,860 Okay, then we have item number three and again on three A. 139 00:09:51,860 --> 00:09:55,440 Probably you want to abstain in that 140 00:09:58,410 --> 00:10:01,350 you would ever. Okay, sorry. Oh, that's right. Yeah, it was previous 141 00:10:02,930 --> 00:10:09,050 I need to abstain of item number A. Yeah, okay. Let's take item by it's a by itself then, please 142 00:10:09,050 --> 00:10:10,650 If you can have a motion 143 00:10:13,500 --> 00:10:16,900 Second motion is second anybody discussion 144 00:10:18,040 --> 00:10:19,700 Roll call please 145 00:10:19,700 --> 00:10:20,840 Dr. O'Connor. 146 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:21,400 I'm staying. 147 00:10:21,780 --> 00:10:22,440 Dr. Holcomb. 148 00:10:23,140 --> 00:10:23,680 Dr. Bolch. 149 00:10:24,220 --> 00:10:24,800 Dr. Robert. 150 00:10:25,100 --> 00:10:25,420 Hi. 151 00:10:25,700 --> 00:10:26,540 I'm Dr. Van Mingerdin. 152 00:10:26,580 --> 00:10:27,040 Yes. 153 00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:28,680 I should pass this for one. 154 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:36,320 Okay, then we got BC and D on Item Number B. Disbursement Report for November 11, 2024, and 155 00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:43,920 it's going to read the minute, December 10, 2024, and then item C, any question in there. 156 00:10:44,280 --> 00:10:49,540 Then item number C, Cema, and you'll vendor payment reports, any questions, then item 157 00:10:49,540 --> 00:10:53,460 Number 3D, Director Quartley Composatial Reports, Second Quarter. 158 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:59,020 Here's no questions, if we can have a motion for 3B, C and D, please. 159 00:10:59,020 --> 00:11:00,320 Some of it. 160 00:11:00,380 --> 00:11:01,280 I'll sign up. 161 00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:03,620 We have a motion in a second and a more discussion. 162 00:11:04,060 --> 00:11:05,160 There's a roll call, please. 163 00:11:05,600 --> 00:11:06,260 Director O'Connor. 164 00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:08,080 Director Holcomb? 165 00:11:09,180 --> 00:11:09,640 Director Bulge? 166 00:11:09,700 --> 00:11:09,980 Aye. 167 00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:10,980 Director Roberts? 168 00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:12,480 Director Ben Wuyren. 169 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:12,940 Yes. 170 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:14,700 Motion passes 5-0. 171 00:11:15,480 --> 00:11:16,640 Okay, we got item number 4. 172 00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:23,720 infinite business, none, item number five new business, consider five A, consider board 173 00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:30,840 to reorganization for 2025. Bob, I'm going to be by transfer there to chair to Bob on 174 00:11:30,840 --> 00:11:32,420 item number A1. 175 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:44,160 Thank you, so I will go through, actually I will bring up the election of the chairperson, 176 00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:46,200 I'm currently case man-waring it in. 177 00:11:46,980 --> 00:11:52,120 I'm looking for a motion to reelect case for the chair of the GSA. 178 00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:54,240 Some moved. 179 00:11:55,280 --> 00:11:56,940 Have a motion in a second. 180 00:11:57,960 --> 00:11:58,860 Have a roll call. 181 00:11:59,480 --> 00:12:00,240 Director O'Connor. 182 00:12:00,980 --> 00:12:01,560 Director Holcomb. 183 00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:02,020 Yes. 184 00:12:02,740 --> 00:12:03,100 Director Baloch. 185 00:12:03,140 --> 00:12:03,360 Hi. 186 00:12:03,760 --> 00:12:04,560 Director Roberts. 187 00:12:05,260 --> 00:12:05,880 Director Van Wagan. 188 00:12:06,160 --> 00:12:06,500 Yes. 189 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:07,860 Motion passes 50. 190 00:12:08,500 --> 00:12:08,700 Okay. 191 00:12:08,700 --> 00:12:11,900 I'll see the seat back to Director Van Waring it in. 192 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:12,180 Okay. 193 00:12:12,180 --> 00:12:21,380 Thank you, Bob. Then we get item number a two election of vice chair person and I would like to nominate Casey. 194 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:23,760 Second. 195 00:12:25,460 --> 00:12:29,120 We're in a motion in a second. Any more discussion? Roll call, please. 196 00:12:30,300 --> 00:12:33,800 Director O'Connor. Hi. Director O'Holkum. Yes. Director Bulge. 197 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:38,600 Director Roberts. Director Van Ringen. Yes. Motion passes five zero. 198 00:12:38,600 --> 00:12:43,180 Then we've got an item number A3, you can see the staff appointments, 199 00:12:44,560 --> 00:12:50,820 3A, Executive Director, Curly, Bob McDonnells, 3B, Treasure, Curly, Norma, 200 00:12:50,980 --> 00:12:57,400 Rosales, Sea, Board Secretary, Curly, Lisa Silva, Alternate Board Secretary, 201 00:12:58,100 --> 00:13:02,840 Curly, Bob McDonnells, so you begin to have a motion on that, please? 202 00:13:03,300 --> 00:13:03,660 Salute. 203 00:13:04,960 --> 00:13:09,140 We're going to motion the second any more discussion. The roll call please. 204 00:13:09,140 --> 00:13:12,960 Director O'Connor. Director Holcomb. Yes. Director Paul. 205 00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:15,180 Director Roberts. Aye. 206 00:13:15,700 --> 00:13:18,140 Director Van Wingerton. Yes. Motion passes 50. 207 00:13:20,180 --> 00:13:26,000 Then what I'd like to do is take number 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. I'll read them. 208 00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:32,180 Any comments or discussion? Otherwise, I'd like to approve this together. 209 00:13:37,750 --> 00:13:45,590 So, number four, attorneys, general counsel, currently carrying parts of Myers-Bitter's 210 00:13:45,590 --> 00:13:51,590 Gibson Jones-Findhold LLP, all that June of Joy, free of nasa. 211 00:13:52,210 --> 00:13:59,030 Then we got B4B, special counsel, groundwater, and sigma, currently Jeremy and young 212 00:13:59,030 --> 00:14:06,790 of Rutan and Tucker L.P. Any questions? Then move on to item number five. Consider 213 00:14:06,790 --> 00:14:12,310 location time and day of the regular board meetings. Currently carpity city all 5-7-7-7-5. 214 00:14:12,490 --> 00:14:19,270 Carpentry Avenue. Carpentry are 5-35 p.m. on any given Wednesday. Coincidental is a 215 00:14:19,270 --> 00:14:29,010 Carpentry Valley Water Board. What a district board meeting. Any questions in 5? Then we 216 00:14:29,010 --> 00:14:37,270 called currently section 54946 of the government code and questions, then we got 7, consider 217 00:14:37,270 --> 00:14:42,770 establishing a Robert Roosevelt order for all proceedings that we're using currently in 218 00:14:42,770 --> 00:14:48,750 the questions, then we got the number 8, consider establishment of board oversight of financial 219 00:14:48,750 --> 00:14:53,610 transactions, currently all directors with a requirement that all bills, statements, 220 00:14:53,610 --> 00:14:59,830 Invoices and claims, exceeding $3,000 are reviewed and approved by one member of the committee. 221 00:15:00,110 --> 00:15:13,270 On a rotating basis that each member be provided by the list of the routine monthly bills and purchases, bill small, then $300 to be approved by the general manager. Any questions? 222 00:15:13,270 --> 00:15:27,410 I have one clarification on that on item six, there's an error in this government code section should breed 549 566 and not 466. 223 00:15:28,010 --> 00:15:29,650 Okay. Well, did his be demanded? 224 00:15:31,410 --> 00:15:32,730 Hi. Thanks. Motion to approve. 225 00:15:33,130 --> 00:15:33,610 As an end. 226 00:15:34,330 --> 00:15:34,710 I'll second. 227 00:15:35,110 --> 00:15:37,090 We've got a motion in a second. Any more discussion? 228 00:15:37,590 --> 00:15:38,430 The roll call, please. 229 00:15:39,610 --> 00:15:40,210 Dr. O'Connor? 230 00:15:40,390 --> 00:15:40,650 Aye. 231 00:15:41,090 --> 00:15:42,050 Dr. Holcomb? Yes. 232 00:15:42,050 --> 00:15:48,230 Dr. Bulge. Director Robert. Director Van Wiggenen. Yes, this is 5-0. 233 00:15:48,710 --> 00:15:54,550 Then we move on to item number B, the sitter, independent of their support, if an 234 00:15:54,550 --> 00:16:00,810 answer statements for the year 2324, prepared by Bartlett Pregnant Wolf for action. 235 00:16:05,780 --> 00:16:09,900 Yes, good evening, directors. Tonight we have with us, Tracy Solomon, who's a partner with 236 00:16:09,900 --> 00:16:12,920 P.P. W. Who's prepared a presentation for you? 237 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:17,160 Good evening. 238 00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:24,120 I believe you guys are going to navigate through the slides for the presentation this evening. 239 00:16:24,500 --> 00:16:28,500 Yes, I'll try to follow along, but let me know when you're moving from one slide to another. 240 00:16:29,260 --> 00:16:29,840 Okay, great. 241 00:16:31,400 --> 00:16:31,940 Thank you. 242 00:16:32,180 --> 00:16:43,460 So, as mentioned, I'm going to cover the June 30, 2024 financial statement on it for 243 00:16:43,460 --> 00:16:45,020 on the next slide. 244 00:16:45,620 --> 00:16:50,380 So in your board package, you received a few letters as well as the financial statements. 245 00:16:50,640 --> 00:16:53,580 So I'm going to start by going over the required communication. 246 00:16:54,100 --> 00:16:58,500 That's covered in those letters and then within the financial statements, 247 00:16:58,580 --> 00:17:02,960 I'll highlight the independent auditors report and then just highlight a few items 248 00:17:02,960 --> 00:17:06,020 within the financial statements themselves. 249 00:17:07,080 --> 00:17:11,400 So turning to the next slide, starting with the required communications 250 00:17:11,400 --> 00:17:21,360 In accordance with audit standards, a letter was provided to the agency regarding the planning phase communication and in the packet, it's referred to it. I believe that's the planning letter. 251 00:17:22,080 --> 00:17:28,340 It covers independence, the planning process, the concept of materiality, audit risk and timing. 252 00:17:28,340 --> 00:17:37,000 And then also a letter of required communication regarding the completion is included and that's our letter of required communication. 253 00:17:37,800 --> 00:17:48,720 And lastly, the third letter that was attached was the representation letter that will be signed by management and provided back to us as part of the completion of the audit. 254 00:17:48,720 --> 00:17:53,800 So, those are the letters I'm going to highlight just a couple of items from the required 255 00:17:53,800 --> 00:17:58,400 communication letter on the completion side of things. 256 00:17:59,680 --> 00:18:05,120 We included in that letter, we noted that we did not discuss with management any alternative 257 00:18:05,120 --> 00:18:11,440 treatments within generally accepted accounting principles for accounting policies or practices 258 00:18:11,440 --> 00:18:14,680 related to material items in the current year. 259 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:23,640 There were no new accounting standards that impacted the district in the current year, nor have there been any changes to the existing significant accounting policies. 260 00:18:24,740 --> 00:18:35,520 We did not identify any significant unusual transactions that occurred in the year under audit, and there were no significant estimates that were reflected in the financial statements. 261 00:18:35,520 --> 00:18:40,380 There were no disagreements with management over the application of significant accounting 262 00:18:40,380 --> 00:18:45,020 principles, the basis of management's judgment on significant matters. 263 00:18:45,320 --> 00:18:49,860 The scope of the audit or any disclosures or the financial statements themselves. 264 00:18:51,120 --> 00:18:57,820 On the next slide, continuing with required communication in the back of the letter, we 265 00:18:57,820 --> 00:19:00,040 attach any audit adjustments. 266 00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:06,060 there was just one adjustment to reclassify interest payable out of the loan balance and that 267 00:19:06,060 --> 00:19:13,280 was for presentation purposes. And that was, as I mentioned, included in the letter. And then 268 00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:19,140 independence is noted as well, and both the planning and the completion letter. And just noting 269 00:19:19,140 --> 00:19:26,180 that we follow, we're required to maintain our independence and we follow the AACPA independence rules. 270 00:19:26,180 --> 00:19:39,620 BPDW does provide non-attest services and that's related to assistance with financial statement preparation and management's responsible for reviewing and approving that service that non-attest service. 271 00:19:40,560 --> 00:19:44,080 And then lastly here, internal control matters. 272 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:51,600 We did not identify any material or significant deficiencies in internal control during the current year. 273 00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:58,060 and the prior year there was a letter that was issued and that was corrected and so no new 274 00:19:58,060 --> 00:20:06,260 comments in the current year. So turning to the independent auditors report included with the 275 00:20:06,260 --> 00:20:14,100 financial statements on page 1 that first paragraph notes that we issued and unmodified or clean 276 00:20:14,100 --> 00:20:20,600 audit opinions so that's what you want. In our opinion we note that the financial statements present 277 00:20:20,600 --> 00:20:22,940 fairly in all material respects. 278 00:20:24,180 --> 00:20:28,060 So that planning letter notes that concept of materiality 279 00:20:28,060 --> 00:20:30,580 that is used here in our audit report. 280 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:34,020 And we conducted our audits in accordance 281 00:20:34,020 --> 00:20:36,040 with auditing standards generally accepted 282 00:20:36,040 --> 00:20:38,380 in the United States of America. 283 00:20:39,040 --> 00:20:40,920 And continuing on the audit report, 284 00:20:41,040 --> 00:20:43,940 there's a section for the auditor's responsibility. 285 00:20:44,480 --> 00:20:46,540 And in there we note that the audits 286 00:20:46,540 --> 00:20:49,260 planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance, 287 00:20:49,260 --> 00:20:57,200 So not absolute about whether the financial statements are as a whole are free from material 288 00:20:57,200 --> 00:20:58,100 misstatements. 289 00:20:59,040 --> 00:21:04,180 And so we are selecting on a test basis when we perform our audit and we're sampling 290 00:21:04,180 --> 00:21:05,160 items throughout. 291 00:21:05,220 --> 00:21:06,720 So we're not testing everything. 292 00:21:07,780 --> 00:21:13,700 And then lastly, I noted that we did not see any internal control material items or 293 00:21:13,700 --> 00:21:20,520 significant items, deficiencies in internal control, and we note in the audit report that we consider 294 00:21:20,520 --> 00:21:26,040 districts internal controls over financial reporting for designing our audit procedures, but not 295 00:21:26,040 --> 00:21:32,380 for the purpose of expressing an opinion over the internal controls, and so accordingly we do not 296 00:21:32,380 --> 00:21:34,900 express an opinion over your internal controls. 297 00:21:37,300 --> 00:21:40,360 On turning to the next slide, the basic financial 298 00:21:40,360 --> 00:22:01,360 statement start on page nine with a statement of net position. And this is a graph before we look at the actual statements themselves just a quick overview of your net position. So on the statement of net position, you have your total assets and your total liabilities. And then your net position is your assets, less your liabilities. And you can see here. 299 00:22:02,240 --> 00:22:09,820 2024's in blue and 2023's in green that your assets were 1.8 a significant increase from 300 00:22:09,820 --> 00:22:16,000 prior year. Your liabilities as well as a significant increase and your total net position 301 00:22:16,000 --> 00:22:23,940 it did at 593,000 which it was negative in the prior year. And so you can see the green from 302 00:22:23,940 --> 00:22:29,280 the 2023 that your liabilities actually exceeded your assets. 303 00:22:30,560 --> 00:22:38,000 Moving on to the next slide is a graph on your statement of revenue expenses and just showing 304 00:22:38,000 --> 00:22:46,760 a comparison from 2024 to 2023 and so operating revenues on your left there and operating 305 00:22:46,760 --> 00:22:55,220 expense in the middle. So operating revenue was 1.3 up from 956,000 so you can see an increase 306 00:22:55,220 --> 00:23:03,040 there and then your expenses actually went down in 2024 compared to 2023. So we'll talk about 307 00:23:03,040 --> 00:23:10,040 that a little bit more when we look at the actual statements themselves. Turning to the next slide. 308 00:23:11,460 --> 00:23:16,980 question please for good yeah sorry to interrupt this Patrick I'm not 309 00:23:16,980 --> 00:23:22,580 position the change year over year 23 to 24 going from negative to negative 310 00:23:22,580 --> 00:23:28,060 see the number there but can you comment on the you know the meaningful 311 00:23:28,060 --> 00:23:33,540 differences year over year that turned us from negative to positive yes definitely 312 00:23:33,540 --> 00:23:42,840 And so let's go to this couple slides forward and we'll look at the actual statement, yeah, that one. 313 00:23:43,380 --> 00:23:47,220 We'll look at the actual statement that shows the detail that makes it that. 314 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:52,200 So in that graph we saw total assets was this top section here. 315 00:23:52,640 --> 00:23:58,620 So the total assets about midway on this statement was 1.8 and we were looking at that compared to the 404. 316 00:23:58,620 --> 00:24:05,560 row four, just real quick I'll highlight the lines that were reflected in that graph. 317 00:24:05,900 --> 00:24:10,640 And then about two thirds of the way down the page is your total liabilities. 318 00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:15,960 And so that was the other bar graph that we saw the 1.26 compared to the 619. 319 00:24:16,080 --> 00:24:25,380 And then the net position at the very bottom that was showing the negative to 15 in the prior going to 593 in the current era. 320 00:24:25,380 --> 00:24:33,240 So going back up to the top of this statement, we saw the, we'll start with current assets. 321 00:24:34,180 --> 00:24:40,600 So your current assets make up the largest portion of your total assets at about 1.1 million. 322 00:24:41,060 --> 00:24:47,880 And you can see that grant receivable is the largest component of that 892,000. 323 00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:57,620 And in prior year, that was 367,000, so that made up the bulk of the increase in your total current assets. 324 00:24:59,260 --> 00:25:17,220 Your capital assets, just below current assets, include your LLKRO, the Park Monitoring Well Project, that occurred during 2024, so 759,000 was recorded as of 2024 compared to zero in 2023. 325 00:25:17,220 --> 00:25:19,400 23 since that was a new project. 326 00:25:19,900 --> 00:25:25,540 So really the driving factor for the increase in total assets were your grant receivable 327 00:25:25,540 --> 00:25:29,500 increase and then your capital assets there. 328 00:25:29,740 --> 00:25:36,980 So those two things drove your assets up in 2024 and then looking at the liability section. 329 00:25:37,960 --> 00:25:44,240 Current liabilities were 971,000 in the current year compared to 219. 330 00:25:44,240 --> 00:25:53,700 So there was an additional borrowing that's reflected in that current portion, and that's related to the related party. 331 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:56,580 Payable to Carpenteria Valley Water District. 332 00:25:57,440 --> 00:26:05,460 And that borrowing was mainly related to the El Caro project, just timing until Grant Funds came in. 333 00:26:05,460 --> 00:26:16,880 And then at your long-term liabilities, total were 293 compared to 390,000 or approximately 400,000 in the prior year. 334 00:26:17,320 --> 00:26:21,500 So a decrease in the long-term portion of the related party payable there. 335 00:26:22,100 --> 00:26:25,680 And then net position, as I mentioned, is assets minus liabilities. 336 00:26:26,400 --> 00:26:34,100 And so your assets one up more than your liabilities in that resulted in your total net position in increasing. 337 00:26:34,100 --> 00:26:42,420 You can see in the net position portion, the net investment capital assets, that's the 759 that we saw related to those 338 00:26:42,420 --> 00:26:45,620 that El Carol monitoring well project. 339 00:26:47,980 --> 00:26:56,880 That is positive, it's that 759 and that's not available for future spending since that's invested in your assets. 340 00:26:56,880 --> 00:27:05,600 And your unrestricted is still negative, it's 160, 6,000, but that's an improvement of about 49,000 from prior year. 341 00:27:07,100 --> 00:27:10,000 That's very helpful, especially for a newcomer. 342 00:27:10,280 --> 00:27:12,340 One thing you didn't come in while was cash. 343 00:27:12,420 --> 00:27:18,420 I think that's also a good performance there to have a positive, free cash flow. 344 00:27:18,980 --> 00:27:19,260 Yes. 345 00:27:19,260 --> 00:27:26,900 Yeah, your cash that's held with U.S. Bank did have over $150,000 improvement there as well. 346 00:27:29,040 --> 00:27:37,020 Yeah, and I'll just remark on that in our last two budgets, we added a cash reserves line, 347 00:27:37,240 --> 00:27:42,520 so we're trying to build up cash reserves, so we're not continuously barring money from CBWD. 348 00:27:43,680 --> 00:27:52,480 sensible. Thanks. Yeah, thank you. Okay, so if we move to the next slide, 349 00:27:54,620 --> 00:27:56,060 this is a snap 350 00:27:56,060 --> 00:28:00,560 shock from the statement of revenues expenses and changes in that position. That's on 351 00:28:00,560 --> 00:28:07,500 page 10 of your financial statements. And this has your revenues and expenses and then 352 00:28:07,500 --> 00:28:11,940 your change in that position. And then at the bottom is that net position that we saw 353 00:28:11,940 --> 00:28:15,620 from the other statement, the 593 at the very bottom, 354 00:28:15,840 --> 00:28:17,660 they're compared to that, 2015. 355 00:28:17,920 --> 00:28:20,700 So this is saying what happened during the year 356 00:28:20,700 --> 00:28:23,020 and that's the change and then what was our beginning 357 00:28:23,020 --> 00:28:26,060 that position and then what's our ending that position? 358 00:28:26,740 --> 00:28:28,000 So looking at the top there, 359 00:28:28,220 --> 00:28:36,380 you're operating revenue was 1.3 million compared to 956,000 360 00:28:36,380 --> 00:28:41,220 in the prior year, and you can see that's comprised of two items 361 00:28:41,220 --> 00:28:54,060 your parcel acreage base B assessment of 417,000 in 2024, and then your grant revenue of 891,000 in 2024. 362 00:28:55,060 --> 00:29:01,220 So overall, the increase from prior year for your operating revenue was 352,000. 363 00:29:02,720 --> 00:29:05,340 Moving to the operating expense section. 364 00:29:05,340 --> 00:29:20,100 You're operating expenses in 2024. We're 495,000 and this is a decrease from prior year of approximately 324,000 and the decrease was due to a couple of items. 365 00:29:20,500 --> 00:29:28,460 You can see your groundwater operation line item there decreased and so that was related to in 2023. 366 00:29:28,460 --> 00:29:35,420 three you had groundwater professional services for the GSP development that was going on in 2023. 367 00:29:36,660 --> 00:29:43,140 So those expenses didn't recur in 2024 and then in 2024 a lot of the expenses that were 368 00:29:43,140 --> 00:29:48,960 incurred were related to the L-Carrow Park Monitoring Wells project that we saw in the previous 369 00:29:48,960 --> 00:29:56,820 statement and those were capitalized. So those expenses didn't show up here. They were capitalized 370 00:29:56,820 --> 00:29:59,960 and their in your assets and will be amortized over. 371 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:08,000 Civil life of that asset. So, overall, you're operating expense decrease. So, we see operating 372 00:30:08,000 --> 00:30:18,920 income at 2024 with 813,000 compared to 137 in the prior year. And then, non-operating income 373 00:30:18,920 --> 00:30:25,420 and expense, a pretty small amount, and that mostly relates to your interest expense. So, you're 374 00:30:25,420 --> 00:30:31,740 overall change for the year that contributed, going back to that question, what were the 375 00:30:31,740 --> 00:30:39,140 things that resulted in that positive change, so revenue exceeding your expenses added 376 00:30:39,140 --> 00:30:40,780 to that bottom line there. 377 00:30:45,360 --> 00:30:49,400 Additionally included in the financial statements is footnote 378 00:30:49,400 --> 00:30:54,200 disclosures that provide some additional detail on some of the line items included in 379 00:30:54,200 --> 00:31:00,320 financial statements. They remain pretty comparable year over year, of course, updated for 380 00:31:00,320 --> 00:31:05,380 anything new. And so I wasn't going to highlight any of the financial statements, but if there's 381 00:31:05,380 --> 00:31:10,860 any questions on any of the statements that I just mentioned or anything else, I would be happy 382 00:31:10,860 --> 00:31:12,000 to address those. 383 00:31:15,140 --> 00:31:20,340 I had a quick one. Just I guess a curiosity question. On a, there's not a tremendous amount of 384 00:31:20,340 --> 00:31:25,940 transactions in the agency. What is the percentage of like transactions reviewed in an 385 00:31:25,940 --> 00:31:36,180 like this. But we don't look at a percentage so we use different sampling methods to do it and 386 00:31:36,180 --> 00:31:43,900 so depending if there's high value items we might get really good coverage on one specific account 387 00:31:44,700 --> 00:31:51,680 if there's fewer items that make up a bigger percentage and if there's more smaller items 388 00:31:51,680 --> 00:31:56,940 Let's say a peer, something like that, then the coverage isn't going to be as high. 389 00:31:57,080 --> 00:31:58,260 So it really varies. 390 00:31:59,060 --> 00:32:04,360 We look at dollar amounts, we have that concept of materiality that I talked about. 391 00:32:04,560 --> 00:32:11,080 So we're looking at significance of individual line items, and then we're sampling based 392 00:32:11,080 --> 00:32:18,600 on those line items, and we are looking at high value items, and then we randomly test non-high 393 00:32:18,600 --> 00:32:19,500 value items. 394 00:32:20,120 --> 00:32:20,600 Thanks. 395 00:32:21,900 --> 00:32:22,740 Any other questions? 396 00:32:25,640 --> 00:32:26,200 Thank you, Tracy. 397 00:32:26,420 --> 00:32:27,820 Do you want to file this report? 398 00:32:28,300 --> 00:32:28,940 Do we need a motion? 399 00:32:29,540 --> 00:32:30,860 Emotion to file it? 400 00:32:31,240 --> 00:32:32,180 Yeah, receiving file. 401 00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:33,840 How it makes motion to receive in file. 402 00:32:34,040 --> 00:32:37,140 I want to thank staff and Tracy for all the work they've done. 403 00:32:37,680 --> 00:32:38,360 I'll second that. 404 00:32:38,520 --> 00:32:39,380 Motion is second. 405 00:32:39,580 --> 00:32:40,280 Any more discussion? 406 00:32:40,720 --> 00:32:41,500 Roll call, please. 407 00:32:42,260 --> 00:32:42,960 Director O'Connor? 408 00:32:43,980 --> 00:32:44,400 Director Holcomb? 409 00:32:44,720 --> 00:32:44,740 Yes. 410 00:32:45,280 --> 00:32:45,800 Director Ball? 411 00:32:45,920 --> 00:32:46,280 Aye. 412 00:32:46,680 --> 00:32:47,200 Director Robert? 413 00:32:49,260 --> 00:32:50,580 Motion passes by zero. 414 00:32:50,580 --> 00:32:57,460 and then item number C consider resolution number 035 updating check signers for action 415 00:32:57,460 --> 00:33:05,600 Bob. We have a new director and so we need to do an update on the signatures that 416 00:33:06,480 --> 00:33:10,140 are allowable for our bank for the GSA. 417 00:33:10,420 --> 00:33:15,300 Some moved. I guess most in the second any discussion roll call please. 418 00:33:15,300 --> 00:33:16,520 Director O'Connor? 419 00:33:16,720 --> 00:33:16,820 Hi. 420 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:17,760 Director Holcomb? 421 00:33:17,940 --> 00:33:18,200 Yes. 422 00:33:18,720 --> 00:33:19,360 Director Bulge? 423 00:33:19,380 --> 00:33:19,700 Hi. 424 00:33:19,960 --> 00:33:20,540 Director Robert? 425 00:33:20,780 --> 00:33:21,900 Director Van Wiggenen? 426 00:33:22,020 --> 00:33:22,380 Yes. 427 00:33:22,620 --> 00:33:23,840 Motion passes 5-0. 428 00:33:24,220 --> 00:33:30,180 Item number D consider resolution number 0-3-6 updating the GSA conflict of interest for 429 00:33:30,180 --> 00:33:31,280 actually bug. 430 00:33:32,360 --> 00:33:33,120 We're required. 431 00:33:33,860 --> 00:33:38,180 Actually, we're newly required for the GSA to have a conflict of interest. 432 00:33:38,880 --> 00:33:49,840 code, and we're required to do a review of those codes every two years, and so the CVWD, 433 00:33:49,900 --> 00:34:02,600 it's on the CVWD agenda, was reviewing the code, and we thought, well, let's do the GSA as 434 00:34:04,600 --> 00:34:14,420 In the packet, the drafts, conflict of interest coaches in there, simply identifies who's 435 00:34:14,420 --> 00:34:22,140 required to do reporting, some key differences in the code, they're based on the state's 436 00:34:22,140 --> 00:34:23,900 model code update. 437 00:34:24,360 --> 00:34:26,220 And so the state puts out a model code. 438 00:34:26,420 --> 00:34:31,360 We look at that and we look at our own code and updated accordingly. 439 00:34:31,360 --> 00:34:40,560 There were some value for gifts and other things, I believe, 440 00:34:44,180 --> 00:34:45,180 all the chains are in red line, 441 00:34:45,680 --> 00:34:47,600 but do you know which section that is? 442 00:34:50,510 --> 00:34:51,650 Yeah, one of the 590. 443 00:34:53,410 --> 00:34:58,950 So it's just the donor disqualification raised to 590 and also the prohibition on gifts. 444 00:35:03,780 --> 00:35:20,500 And so we have to approve this by a resolution, so this is a resolution 36, but you have any questions, if not out? 445 00:35:20,840 --> 00:35:22,380 I've just got one small question. 446 00:35:22,640 --> 00:35:25,180 I read through the changes seems pretty not clear. 447 00:35:25,640 --> 00:35:32,520 But it's not clear is there any other action for the board or the other responsible, you know, parties to that policy. 448 00:35:33,160 --> 00:35:37,940 besides the forms of an hundred. Is there anything else about this? Is the disclosure requirements? 449 00:35:37,940 --> 00:35:45,240 Yeah, the reporting and disclosure requirements. Oh, if you did seven hundred you're good. Well, for each agency. So 450 00:35:45,240 --> 00:35:50,180 correct. And there are different agencies. So, unfortunately, you would have to do that too. And I believe the 451 00:35:53,180 --> 00:36:01,240 GSA is different. It's not, is it's directly with the FPC, right? Yeah. So it's a little bit different than the 452 00:36:02,900 --> 00:36:14,640 CVWD reporting, which is done through the county elections office, but we'll go over all of that as the time comes in a couple of months. 453 00:36:15,440 --> 00:36:19,640 Plus, we do. Was it annual conflict of interest training? 454 00:36:20,960 --> 00:36:22,120 The ethics training? 455 00:36:22,340 --> 00:36:22,880 Every year? 456 00:36:23,760 --> 00:36:24,620 Every year? 457 00:36:24,620 --> 00:36:24,780 Every year? 458 00:36:26,460 --> 00:36:26,820 Okay. 459 00:36:27,120 --> 00:36:30,040 I just want to just pray more important than the whole Bible, but that's okay. 460 00:36:30,620 --> 00:36:33,780 But the 700 form. I mean, that's not that's a pretty big 461 00:36:34,520 --> 00:36:40,920 Yeah, that's a lot. Yes, yes, do it for every help this guys in there in DC use the same form we do 462 00:36:43,410 --> 00:36:45,550 We need motion. I probably makes much 463 00:36:47,030 --> 00:36:51,810 Second we got a motion the second and any more discussion roll call, please 464 00:36:51,810 --> 00:37:00,630 Director of Connor. I direct to Holcomb. Yes, direct to Volts. I direct Roberts. I direct to Van McGregor. Yes, motion passes five zero 465 00:37:01,410 --> 00:37:05,410 And then we got Executive Director reports, six A financials. 466 00:37:07,630 --> 00:37:08,150 I know. 467 00:37:08,390 --> 00:37:08,730 All right. 468 00:37:09,170 --> 00:37:09,310 Yeah. 469 00:37:09,570 --> 00:37:14,310 Financials through November 30th, so over 42% of the year at November, our revenues 470 00:37:14,310 --> 00:37:17,170 for the CGSA are at 37%. 471 00:37:17,690 --> 00:37:18,970 Again, it's on the tax. 472 00:37:19,070 --> 00:37:22,450 Also, it's just payments that we were dispersements that we received from the county 473 00:37:22,450 --> 00:37:23,630 through the end of November. 474 00:37:25,630 --> 00:37:29,750 And then our operating expenditures are at about 24% through the year. 475 00:37:31,420 --> 00:37:33,300 Any questions, 476 00:37:36,280 --> 00:37:40,840 then we are adjourned and we are re-adjourning the regular meeting of the 477 00:37:40,840 --> 00:37:42,280 Carpety Valley Water District. 478 00:37:51,060 --> 00:37:54,460 So I just the question is, which item does Will 479 00:37:54,460 --> 00:37:58,880 Carthland want to read? That will be item 7B. 480 00:38:01,270 --> 00:38:03,550 It will be. It will be. 481 00:38:09,570 --> 00:38:12,110 I believe there is one more comment on that item. 482 00:38:12,110 --> 00:38:21,290 You've got surely an item C, something C, so we got will for a seven B, and we got surely for a seven C. 483 00:38:21,790 --> 00:38:22,930 At least anybody else, 484 00:38:25,020 --> 00:38:26,840 unless the board's wanted to participate. 485 00:38:28,800 --> 00:38:29,420 Anyhow, 486 00:38:32,740 --> 00:38:42,040 a new business, a seven A, consider a project update for CAP for information, Bob, and a presentation by Chris Meligan. 487 00:38:43,660 --> 00:38:51,320 Yeah, so this is a project update from a design standpoint and project manager standpoint. 488 00:38:51,540 --> 00:39:00,220 As you recall, WSC is our project management company for this project and so they're kind of working on all the ends of this project. 489 00:39:01,080 --> 00:39:06,200 And so Chris is here tonight to give kind of an update of where we are. 490 00:39:06,740 --> 00:39:08,300 Chris, are you with us? 491 00:39:08,660 --> 00:39:09,320 Yes, I am. 492 00:39:09,320 --> 00:39:10,200 You hear me? 493 00:39:10,580 --> 00:39:13,440 Can you see the screen? 494 00:39:15,540 --> 00:39:16,500 Yes, I can. 495 00:39:17,380 --> 00:39:18,660 Just let me know when you want to advance. 496 00:39:19,440 --> 00:39:19,700 Great. 497 00:39:19,920 --> 00:39:20,760 Well, thank you, Bob. 498 00:39:21,340 --> 00:39:21,560 Okay. 499 00:39:21,720 --> 00:39:23,220 Well, good evening, everyone. 500 00:39:23,900 --> 00:39:31,140 As Bob noted, this is just a general project overview presentation, covering various aspects 501 00:39:31,140 --> 00:39:32,920 of ongoing activities. 502 00:39:34,000 --> 00:39:36,340 So let's go to next slide. 503 00:39:36,340 --> 00:39:44,340 So, if it's our agenda, we'll briefly discuss where we're at with design of the project, 504 00:39:45,140 --> 00:39:47,580 provided small permitting updates, 505 00:39:49,700 --> 00:39:52,500 outreach, contractor coordination, 506 00:39:54,700 --> 00:39:57,220 and discuss upcoming milestones. 507 00:39:58,460 --> 00:39:59,380 So, next slide. 508 00:40:03,090 --> 00:40:12,490 Just as a current update to the design progression, and as a quick reminder, we are currently 509 00:40:12,490 --> 00:40:19,650 developing three different design packages, and when I say we, it's the project team. 510 00:40:19,950 --> 00:40:26,910 Design is being done by wooded and current, and so that we've got three separate packages, 511 00:40:26,910 --> 00:40:35,130 the AWPF for the actual facility design, the conveyance pipelines, and then the injection and monitoring 512 00:40:35,130 --> 00:40:42,810 wells. Those are split into three packages for a couple of different reasons. Primarily 513 00:40:42,810 --> 00:40:52,310 the contractor that will extract the AWPF is rather specialized, and there are only certain 514 00:40:52,310 --> 00:40:57,210 number of larger firms to have the qualifications to construct 515 00:40:57,210 --> 00:40:59,630 advanced water purification facility. 516 00:41:01,790 --> 00:41:06,250 But we don't want to lump the entire project within the single construction 517 00:41:06,250 --> 00:41:11,910 package because that will prohibit smaller local contractors from 518 00:41:11,910 --> 00:41:13,350 participating in the program. 519 00:41:14,510 --> 00:41:19,430 So by separating the ADMPS from our advanced pipelines, we do give 520 00:41:19,430 --> 00:41:25,450 opportunities for smaller local contractors to participate in the form of constructing the 521 00:41:25,450 --> 00:41:33,850 conveyance pipeline. And then the injection and monitor wells such as specialized instruction 522 00:41:33,850 --> 00:41:41,390 efforts that the A to the PF contractors would need to sub that work out anyway in this entirety. 523 00:41:42,330 --> 00:41:46,950 So for those reasons we have three separate design packages. The A to the PF is currently 524 00:41:46,950 --> 00:41:51,970 the in-between 75% and 100%. 525 00:41:51,970 --> 00:41:56,910 So what are the parents admitted the 75% design package in October? 526 00:41:57,810 --> 00:42:05,150 That was reviewed by our firm as well as the corporate standard theory district and Bob 527 00:42:05,150 --> 00:42:10,210 and comments were returned to them in December. 528 00:42:10,210 --> 00:42:21,490 We've had some review meetings to review those comments and they're currently on track to submit the 100% design in February. 529 00:42:22,410 --> 00:42:33,630 After there's still another short design tier or short review period before a midset document will be produced and we expect that in May of this year. 530 00:42:33,630 --> 00:42:41,190 We have received, or we received 75% design for the conveyance pipelines and injection 531 00:42:41,190 --> 00:42:50,530 amount to wells in later December, those packages have been reviewed, and comments returned 532 00:42:50,530 --> 00:42:56,270 on the injection mines from wells, actually just earlier this week, and then it's a 533 00:42:56,270 --> 00:43:01,530 state of returning comments on the conveyance pipelines later this week, and then those 534 00:43:01,530 --> 00:43:10,490 scheduled to move forward to 100% design with complete shin and April timeframe, and then 535 00:43:10,490 --> 00:43:20,590 ultimately going out to bid on the AWS and May will have somewhat extended period, because 536 00:43:20,590 --> 00:43:26,150 of the complexity of the project beyond what you might typically see for construction projects, 537 00:43:26,150 --> 00:43:28,710 And then with conveyance and injection, 538 00:43:28,970 --> 00:43:31,630 mantra will bid in shortly behind it. 539 00:43:32,850 --> 00:43:37,270 But with the expectation that we're gonna have bids 540 00:43:37,270 --> 00:43:44,450 for all three when we bring them to the board 541 00:43:44,450 --> 00:43:47,230 or at least native pf project to the board 542 00:43:47,230 --> 00:43:50,630 for consideration the approval of the contract. 543 00:43:51,570 --> 00:43:53,070 And currently, it's stated for July, 544 00:43:55,610 --> 00:43:56,130 next slide. 545 00:43:57,800 --> 00:44:06,060 for our permitting and a piloting three of our key project permits that are going. 546 00:44:07,380 --> 00:44:12,800 Our first is our conditional east permit called development permit with the city of Carpenteria. 547 00:44:14,560 --> 00:44:18,880 We have seen this slide similar kind of update a few months ago. 548 00:44:19,280 --> 00:44:23,440 That application went into the city and August last year. 549 00:44:23,440 --> 00:44:44,340 The city reviewed, admitted their letter of non-completeness, which we expected, because there are few outstanding items that we won't have, especially as it relates to the easements with the Catholic Church that we talked about in December. 550 00:44:45,900 --> 00:44:49,600 We've got our responses to those comments to the city. 551 00:44:50,940 --> 00:44:55,720 We anticipate those still moving forward with the opposite of the city. 552 00:44:55,880 --> 00:44:59,680 We've been forward with the application as they can and sort of expect. 553 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:07,000 Our public hearing sometime in April before we go out to bid. 554 00:45:09,740 --> 00:45:16,500 And then, for our waste discharge, water reclamation permits, this is really the permits granted by some 555 00:45:16,500 --> 00:45:29,980 to post regional water quality control board that allows for the facility to operate in the injection of the 556 00:45:29,980 --> 00:45:36,740 the W over the last couple of months, we've discussed approaches to some of the more technical 557 00:45:36,740 --> 00:45:44,460 aspects that are more projects specific. So, the anti-degradation and geochemical analysis 558 00:45:44,460 --> 00:45:52,020 studies that are required in the part of the Title 22 engineering report. So, the anti-degradation 559 00:45:52,020 --> 00:46:02,580 study, it's a study that evaluates and sort of affirms that the injection of the purified 560 00:46:02,580 --> 00:46:13,560 water won't introduce contaminants into the groundwater basin above the thresholds deemed 561 00:46:13,560 --> 00:46:21,560 five regulations. So, one of particular that we are concerned and look at is boron, which is 562 00:46:22,120 --> 00:46:31,980 somewhat higher in CBWVs, audible water supply, primarily stemming from like a tumour water, 563 00:46:32,340 --> 00:46:39,760 then it is in the background, brown water. And so, some of the work that we've done recently 564 00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:48,360 sort of shows that we're not going to substantively reduce or impact the groundwater 565 00:46:48,360 --> 00:46:55,860 quality from the injection of our certified water and those meetings discussed the 566 00:46:55,860 --> 00:47:00,520 approach and sort of our preliminary findings were held recently with the State Board 567 00:47:00,520 --> 00:47:04,020 before we finalized any technical documents to them. 568 00:47:04,020 --> 00:47:14,420 Similarly, we've got a GM chemical analysis and that analyzes the mobilization of constituents through the addition of pure flood water. 569 00:47:15,180 --> 00:47:27,100 So chiefly among them that stuff concern is arsenic, where arsenic may be elevated after the introduction of pure flood water. 570 00:47:27,100 --> 00:47:38,940 Again, we've sort of done some initial analysis to that, and that draft report was submitted to the reasonable board at the latter part of 2024. 571 00:47:40,440 --> 00:47:55,140 Those documents along with the general description of the facility and how we're going to address Title 22 requirements all go into an engineering report, which is submitted to the Division of Drinking Water. 572 00:47:55,140 --> 00:48:03,440 We anticipate submitting and spring this year, which will give DDW about a year for review, 573 00:48:03,680 --> 00:48:11,080 which is about the expectation, because they are so backlogged, and all of that needs 574 00:48:11,080 --> 00:48:18,500 to be submitted and approved before we can ultimately submit our report, the voice discharge, 575 00:48:19,700 --> 00:48:22,520 and begin operation of the facility. 576 00:48:23,740 --> 00:48:27,220 But we're coordinating so closely with the regulators 577 00:48:28,220 --> 00:48:31,880 because we know that we're not going to get 578 00:48:31,880 --> 00:48:34,900 and it's just simply the process of these facilities. 579 00:48:35,780 --> 00:48:41,880 You are permits for an operation before we start construction. 580 00:48:42,800 --> 00:48:45,700 So that is just the normal course of these projects. 581 00:48:46,020 --> 00:48:47,620 Can I ask you a question on that, Chris? 582 00:48:47,620 --> 00:48:50,940 Yes, why is that? 583 00:48:51,380 --> 00:49:01,680 Well, so much of the information that goes into the reports, the antidexted study, the 584 00:49:01,680 --> 00:49:08,620 geochemical analysis, and the title point to report, is based on the design. 585 00:49:09,920 --> 00:49:23,040 And so you could theoretically pause after the design is complete or mostly completes before 586 00:49:23,040 --> 00:49:28,900 you're going out to bed and wait, I think, to go through this process. 587 00:49:29,100 --> 00:49:33,920 And there are some things that those still likely cannot be completed, I think they do look 588 00:49:33,920 --> 00:49:36,900 for information specific to your projects. 589 00:49:37,340 --> 00:49:43,880 So, right, we prepare projects that say we're going to, you know, contract, you must 590 00:49:43,880 --> 00:49:49,940 meet all of these requirements with your RO, but we don't specify a vendor. 591 00:49:50,940 --> 00:49:56,080 We don't specify the various specific details regarding the package, but they must meet 592 00:49:56,080 --> 00:49:59,780 these requirements for our project. 593 00:49:59,780 --> 00:50:07,520 And so some of that just simply goes into the report and you can't know that exactly until you've got it on track for on board. 594 00:50:10,720 --> 00:50:19,080 So for those reasons, you know, we, it's just not how these facilities operate and that's okay. 595 00:50:19,540 --> 00:50:27,840 Again, because we are working so closely to review the project and these studies ahead of time. 596 00:50:28,840 --> 00:50:36,340 And to the extent that we can, we're incorporating any comments that we receive, or feedback that we receive now. 597 00:50:38,260 --> 00:50:40,900 Okay, see does that answer your question? 598 00:50:41,060 --> 00:50:47,400 Yeah, I think it answers my question, so it sounds like generally it just proceeds ahead because people want to do. 599 00:50:48,180 --> 00:50:54,340 Yeah, yeah, I mean, like I said, I think they're probably, I mean, if you really wanted to wait, you could. 600 00:50:55,660 --> 00:51:04,080 But that means there'd be a long period of time between submission of the title 20 reports, 601 00:51:04,740 --> 00:51:08,220 approval of that report, but you'd be sitting on the documents. 602 00:51:09,520 --> 00:51:15,340 All the while inflation is occurring, project cost kind of never go down over time, 603 00:51:15,340 --> 00:51:24,740 very rarely go down over time and so you're you're doing the project at the service by not 604 00:51:24,740 --> 00:51:32,740 proceeding in parallel. So does DDW issue prior to the regional board for dischargers at the other way around 605 00:51:32,740 --> 00:51:39,140 or is it kind of decided together? Yeah, so you get or after submission for division of drinking water 606 00:51:39,140 --> 00:51:46,560 approves the title 22 into an import, only then can you really submit your application to 607 00:51:46,560 --> 00:51:54,300 the regional board for your waste discharge water reclamation permit. So regional board requires 608 00:51:54,300 --> 00:52:02,960 approval of the title 22 reports before they want to see an application. And so once DDW 609 00:52:02,960 --> 00:52:08,580 produce it, which is about a year, what's the regional boards turn around like much faster. 610 00:52:10,320 --> 00:52:18,560 I mean, obviously we can't troll it, the things can vary, but the bulk of the review 611 00:52:18,560 --> 00:52:21,040 process occurs during the title point two report. 612 00:52:21,720 --> 00:52:25,160 So it should be on the order of a couple of months. 613 00:52:25,740 --> 00:52:30,640 We'll stay at three to six months and that time has been incorporated into our schedule. 614 00:52:30,640 --> 00:52:37,520 So ultimately with the goal of having that permanent in place before beginning the initial 615 00:52:37,520 --> 00:52:45,360 pescine phase of the facility, and all of that time, review time is currently built 616 00:52:45,360 --> 00:52:51,260 through the schedule and where are spring of 25 for submission of the total 20 injury 617 00:52:51,260 --> 00:52:53,340 report comes in a play. 618 00:52:54,460 --> 00:52:54,520 Thanks. 619 00:52:55,300 --> 00:53:00,620 I think I had a silver question Chris that was partially answered on the year that the 620 00:53:01,440 --> 00:53:05,700 DWR takes and just to make sure we don't have to just sit there, is there a certain 621 00:53:05,700 --> 00:53:11,640 pinging that either we do Bob or that Chris does to be in touch with that to see how it's 622 00:53:11,640 --> 00:53:15,780 going or any kind of tracking just to make sure that we're not caught off guard after three months 623 00:53:15,780 --> 00:53:22,200 or six months. Oh, we actually waiting for this information is there. We're having team meetings with 624 00:53:22,200 --> 00:53:29,680 the staff at both agencies to make sure that they're seeing what we're doing when we do submit the 625 00:53:29,680 --> 00:53:38,780 applications. No, no, no, of course not. Yeah. Thanks, Bob. Yeah, I've got a couple of questions 626 00:53:38,780 --> 00:53:45,720 of like, good. This is Patrick. I apologize for naive questions coming in. It's not all so to speak. 627 00:53:46,600 --> 00:53:50,320 I'll just give you the questions and you're fair to answer them as quickly as I'm asking them. 628 00:53:51,800 --> 00:53:58,520 One is, can you give a sense for the amount of impact on step four there, the impact 629 00:53:58,520 --> 00:54:05,140 of residents and businesses just out of curiosity and how order of magnitude, would you 630 00:54:05,140 --> 00:54:06,160 express that? 631 00:54:06,420 --> 00:54:11,060 And the second is with respect to the schedule that we were just talking about is an expectation 632 00:54:11,060 --> 00:54:17,040 of an impact of current events down in LA County in competition for resources, you know, as 633 00:54:17,040 --> 00:54:18,680 we're setting out these bid packages. 634 00:54:19,720 --> 00:54:28,500 Yeah, thank you. Those are two good questions. So the step for that reach from the project team to residents and this is impacted. 635 00:54:30,360 --> 00:54:47,660 So as a part of this CPCDP process, we provided the city with our 300 foot zone around the project area where they are going to notify the planning commission hearing. 636 00:54:47,660 --> 00:54:56,060 And that includes the facility, the alignment of the advanced pipeline, and it's also 637 00:54:56,060 --> 00:55:01,660 the wells, as a part of our project and process. 638 00:55:02,100 --> 00:55:12,360 We intend to do similar outreach, their city's notification is going to be very matter 639 00:55:12,360 --> 00:55:20,740 fact about the projects and, you know, it's, I think, imperative that we provide that's 640 00:55:20,740 --> 00:55:25,880 similar kind of outrage to those residents about the benefits of the project. 641 00:55:27,640 --> 00:55:32,900 Sorry, so we have tens or hundreds of properties or what sort of magnitude we're talking about. 642 00:55:33,380 --> 00:55:39,640 It is definitely in the hundreds of properties, yes, because it covers the entire pipeline 643 00:55:39,640 --> 00:55:43,340 and alignments from the existing wastewater treatment plant, 644 00:55:44,060 --> 00:55:47,200 all the way up to Lyndon and METO view. 645 00:55:48,360 --> 00:55:50,360 So it is, yeah, I don't know the number off-hand 646 00:55:50,360 --> 00:55:53,980 I apologize, but it is in the hundreds of notifications. 647 00:55:55,660 --> 00:55:56,340 Good enough, thanks. 648 00:55:57,380 --> 00:55:59,360 And then your second question, 649 00:56:00,860 --> 00:56:03,840 obviously that's really hard to know 650 00:56:05,060 --> 00:56:13,380 And very tragic that the communities down in the area are facing, you know, my initial sort 651 00:56:13,380 --> 00:56:23,040 of gut that the, you know, the contractor overlap between those that are going to support 652 00:56:23,040 --> 00:56:33,820 all of the homeless families who've lost so much down there is different than, you know, 653 00:56:33,820 --> 00:56:41,540 building this facility, you know, they specialize in large largely anyway specialized in 654 00:56:41,540 --> 00:56:43,460 treatment, facility construction. 655 00:56:46,500 --> 00:56:51,460 So, you know, what may there be impacts from a material standpoint 656 00:56:51,460 --> 00:57:01,330 concrete, for example, you know, I can't say no, I'm not exactly sure, but, you know, they're 657 00:57:01,330 --> 00:57:07,210 certainly maybe. That's kind of an honest or I know. Well, you're moving. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. 658 00:57:08,850 --> 00:57:11,110 Thanks. Mm-hmm. 659 00:57:14,950 --> 00:57:21,210 Okay. I'll reach. Yeah. Quick. Quick update here. So at this point in time, 660 00:57:22,490 --> 00:57:31,730 we have now held listening sessions with the entire board, both your board and the 661 00:57:31,730 --> 00:57:38,690 a sanitary district board, which has been very great and formative and appreciate everyone's 662 00:57:38,690 --> 00:57:40,470 time here and doing that. 663 00:57:42,090 --> 00:57:49,370 We intend to present summary of those listed instructions at the next four meeting. 664 00:57:50,850 --> 00:57:54,810 Concurrently, we're moving forward with market research. 665 00:57:54,810 --> 00:58:01,910 So, we met with FM3, Marka Research firm, last Friday, kicked them off. 666 00:58:02,830 --> 00:58:05,170 Some initial feedback was provided to them. 667 00:58:05,610 --> 00:58:10,730 Their next step is to generate survey questions that will go out to the community. 668 00:58:11,970 --> 00:58:19,250 We anticipate also presenting draft of those questions to this board at the next meeting. 669 00:58:19,250 --> 00:58:23,610 And so you should see those two items come up at the next meeting. 670 00:58:24,650 --> 00:58:29,530 And the information that we gather from, or we have gathered from the list and sessions 671 00:58:29,530 --> 00:58:37,590 plus all the markets research is going to be key and informing the outreach materials that 672 00:58:37,590 --> 00:58:43,410 master messaging for the facility and the project, including the development of the general 673 00:58:43,410 --> 00:58:49,230 presentation that can be given, just a high level project. 674 00:58:49,230 --> 00:58:57,570 presentation, it will help inform future publications, new articles, new articles, and the 675 00:58:57,570 --> 00:59:05,230 coastal view, it will help inform our bill insert that we're intending to send out, noting 676 00:59:05,230 --> 00:59:11,390 as I was talking about to this maybe the application, project video, and then general information 677 00:59:11,390 --> 00:59:12,550 I could, 678 00:59:16,060 --> 00:59:36,620 okay, excline, minor kind of quick updates here. So at the last board meeting, your board approved the offer for the St. Joseph church easement, that offer was mailed on December 20th. 679 00:59:36,620 --> 00:59:45,740 no real hard update here other than noting that the district's consultant and our 680 00:59:45,740 --> 00:59:50,840 jewel property consultant made initial contact. There's still trying to catch up from the holidays, 681 00:59:51,860 --> 00:59:59,940 but we hope to hear some initial feedback here soon. And then something else that we're undertaking here. 682 01:00:00,430 --> 01:00:22,070 This springtime is conducting some of that contractor outreach. So it's important to inform contractors of projects of this kind of management to well ahead of when we intend to release the documents. 683 01:00:22,070 --> 01:00:28,830 It's a pretty significant undertaking for these contractors to put a price, a firm price, and a 684 01:00:28,830 --> 01:00:29,730 bid together. 685 01:00:30,630 --> 01:00:39,110 The design package will include more than 300 design sheets, specifications are 2,000 pages 686 01:00:39,110 --> 01:00:40,090 long. 687 01:00:40,410 --> 01:00:48,990 It takes a long time for them to review and make sure that their bid is competitive as it can 688 01:00:48,990 --> 01:00:59,270 And so it really helps to reach out and get contractors who are qualified up to speed on the facility. 689 01:01:00,770 --> 01:01:03,430 Give them some information about it. 690 01:01:03,430 --> 01:01:05,670 Kind of get them excited about the project. 691 01:01:05,950 --> 01:01:09,190 Get them wanting to sharpen their pencils on the project. 692 01:01:09,950 --> 01:01:16,870 It helps enhance the number of contractors who will participate. 693 01:01:16,870 --> 01:01:22,710 And ultimately, you know, hopefully, leading to a more competitive bid. 694 01:01:23,370 --> 01:01:30,830 And we've reached out to nine contractors who we know have worked on so much facilities throughout the state. 695 01:01:31,750 --> 01:01:36,490 And thus far, we've conducted two tours at the 16th of the 16th of the 16th of the facilities, 696 01:01:37,250 --> 01:01:41,110 and generally provided information related to the projects. 697 01:01:41,110 --> 01:01:49,290 and as we continue to reach out and the contractors request will hold additional tours. 698 01:01:52,080 --> 01:01:52,700 Next slide. 699 01:01:55,310 --> 01:02:00,890 So finally, just to put sort of milestone update here, we're going to see in 700 01:02:00,890 --> 01:02:09,350 the next couple of months. February, design documents on a percent for AWS PF, water supply 701 01:02:09,350 --> 01:02:17,390 alternative analysis and an economic analysis updates in March. Hopefully we'll have our community 702 01:02:17,390 --> 01:02:24,250 survey results and then 100% design documents for advanced pipelines, commission planning 703 01:02:24,250 --> 01:02:33,090 commission here in an April, may advertise our big package for the AWS and operations agreement 704 01:02:33,090 --> 01:02:37,130 execution, and then finally in early summer, 705 01:02:37,890 --> 01:02:41,610 advertised the pipeline, sponsored wells, and then receive 706 01:02:41,610 --> 01:02:44,390 our bids for all three debt packages. 707 01:02:47,240 --> 01:02:48,860 And I think that concludes my presentation. 708 01:02:51,440 --> 01:02:52,080 Any questions? 709 01:02:54,340 --> 01:02:58,020 Is there a map of the impact and properties that already exist? 710 01:03:00,180 --> 01:03:00,800 Yes. 711 01:03:00,800 --> 01:03:07,380 that the the radius map was submitted to the city as a part of the application. 712 01:03:10,150 --> 01:03:11,110 Thank you. 713 01:03:11,110 --> 01:03:12,410 I have a really dumb question. 714 01:03:14,230 --> 01:03:18,310 But if nobody bids, I mean, I've been there before when you just, you thought, 715 01:03:18,430 --> 01:03:20,730 you're going to get a couple bitters and give it. 716 01:03:20,970 --> 01:03:22,970 And so, I mean, not to be negative. 717 01:03:23,050 --> 01:03:25,450 I'm not a negative person, but I know bids. 718 01:03:25,710 --> 01:03:26,470 And I know our fees. 719 01:03:26,910 --> 01:03:31,130 And especially during very complex projects like this in tough times, there's this curious. 720 01:03:31,130 --> 01:03:37,290 Well, we have any kind of sense of any of the interested parties that speak at closer to this or yeah, that's 721 01:03:37,290 --> 01:03:44,110 Absolutely, I mean, so this is, you know, part of the reason why we're doing this contractor outreach, you know, 722 01:03:44,170 --> 01:03:45,130 two or so far. 723 01:03:45,850 --> 01:03:46,710 Second, sorry. 724 01:03:46,870 --> 01:03:49,910 I thought it was pretty good that you had two tours so far going through, you know. 725 01:03:50,170 --> 01:03:51,510 Yeah, and that's hard. 726 01:03:51,670 --> 01:04:00,670 I mean, not to, you know, that's a, you know, that's a two firms who have toured the facility, you know, 727 01:04:00,670 --> 01:04:05,030 certainly have expressed their interest and desire to prepare their bids. 728 01:04:06,470 --> 01:04:09,910 So, obviously, I can't, we're not going to hold their feet to the fire here. 729 01:04:09,930 --> 01:04:11,970 You have to know what's going to happen. You never know, right? 730 01:04:13,270 --> 01:04:16,690 But, you know, the reason why we do this outreach is to make sure that we do have 731 01:04:16,690 --> 01:04:22,970 bids. And, you know, I think that that scenario is very low. 732 01:04:24,050 --> 01:04:29,090 But, whatever we can do to help encourage that competitive bit of an environment we will. 733 01:04:31,150 --> 01:04:32,350 Thank you. 734 01:04:32,350 --> 01:04:34,510 Thank you. 735 01:04:34,510 --> 01:04:34,770 Thank you. 736 01:04:34,810 --> 01:04:35,070 Thank you, risk. 737 01:04:36,270 --> 01:04:36,970 Thank you. 738 01:04:37,150 --> 01:04:37,650 Thank you. 739 01:04:39,800 --> 01:04:41,480 Then we move on to item number 7B. 740 01:04:42,200 --> 01:04:47,120 You can see the text roll generated revenues for a cap for information and the presentation 741 01:04:47,120 --> 01:04:48,060 by Mesa. 742 01:04:49,320 --> 01:04:53,880 So we have one letter but we'll wait on that till we have the presentation. 743 01:04:57,920 --> 01:04:58,520 Sorry. 744 01:04:59,660 --> 01:05:06,980 So this is something that we've talked about at a committee level, and I believe we talked 745 01:05:06,980 --> 01:05:07,900 about it last year. 746 01:05:08,060 --> 01:05:11,760 We did talk about it last board meeting on the financial update for CAP. 747 01:05:13,240 --> 01:05:17,680 We've done a little bit of work analyzing it, and so Mesa is going to talk about it. 748 01:05:17,740 --> 01:05:23,500 We still have a lot further to go, but you'll see where we're at. 749 01:05:26,980 --> 01:05:27,280 All right. 750 01:05:27,420 --> 01:05:29,080 You can just go to the first line. 751 01:05:30,580 --> 01:05:35,980 So just a quick overview, as Bob mentioned, we're planning on having a series of presentations 752 01:05:35,980 --> 01:05:36,600 here. 753 01:05:36,900 --> 01:05:41,600 So this first one will be a bit high level, and then in subsequent presentations we'll 754 01:05:41,600 --> 01:05:42,940 go into more of the details. 755 01:05:44,060 --> 01:05:49,820 But we're going to touch on the different church collection mechanisms, some of the challenges 756 01:05:49,820 --> 01:05:54,140 it just a high level and we'll get into more details later on that, some of the benefits 757 01:05:54,140 --> 01:06:00,800 to consider, and then we want to bring up outreach expectations and timeline as well, so if 758 01:06:00,800 --> 01:06:07,700 you'll go to the first slide, Bob, so what we're going to do is present two different ways 759 01:06:07,700 --> 01:06:15,180 we can recover costs associated with CAP, and through a series of meetings we're going to 760 01:06:15,180 --> 01:06:20,740 provide you information on the impacts and considerations for these two different methods so that 761 01:06:20,740 --> 01:06:26,920 eventually we could ask you to make a decision. That will be several meetings away. So again, 762 01:06:27,060 --> 01:06:32,520 this is just going to be an introduction into these decision points. So what we're considering here 763 01:06:32,520 --> 01:06:41,080 is we can either recover cap expenses through putting charges on customer property tax bills or 764 01:06:41,080 --> 01:06:47,600 water bills. And so for both these methods we're talking about having a charge based on 765 01:06:47,600 --> 01:06:52,040 So it would be essentially be a fixed charge either way, it's just where it's that appear. 766 01:06:53,520 --> 01:07:01,020 And for both of these approaches, we would need to go through a property team process and update our existing financial and cost of service model. 767 01:07:01,300 --> 01:07:06,360 So it will be a fairly comprehensive process no matter which method we go with. 768 01:07:06,620 --> 01:07:15,480 We can also consider having a combination of these two approaches where we have some charges collected through the tax roll and some through customer bills. 769 01:07:16,280 --> 01:07:24,280 So I'll go into the details a little bit on this view, proceed Bob, you can go to the next one. 770 01:07:25,760 --> 01:07:36,140 So I want to give just sort of a high level overview of how we would calculate the charge that would appear on a property tax bill. 771 01:07:36,620 --> 01:07:44,480 And again, these are not final numbers, but I want to give you a sense of just how it should be done to have some idea of what it would look like. 772 01:07:44,480 --> 01:07:55,560 So, the thing to consider here is that that total cost shown the 4.3 million, what we're talking about with this approach would be that would be cap debt and 773 01:07:55,560 --> 01:08:03,160 operation and maintenance, and then the coverage ratio baked into that too. So we're essentially putting all pieces of cap into that cost. 774 01:08:03,160 --> 01:08:14,100 And what you do is we have capacity ratios there, which are set by a WWA, and we use those to scale our charges two different meter sizes. 775 01:08:14,580 --> 01:08:19,340 So we take the capacity ratios, that's the middle column there of the table on the right. 776 01:08:20,160 --> 01:08:28,820 The count of meter sizes at each meter size, and we use that to determine the meter equivalents, so that right hand column there. 777 01:08:29,260 --> 01:08:32,420 So we know how many total meter equivalents we have. 778 01:08:32,420 --> 01:08:43,080 And that allows us to divide that total charge so we get a per unit, and that means per meter unit, in this case, not dwelling unit charge. 779 01:08:43,280 --> 01:08:53,460 So you can see if the total cost is about 4.3 million and we have about 7700 meter equivalents, the charge per unit per meter unit would be about $560. 780 01:08:54,580 --> 01:08:59,500 And again, not final numbers, but I want to give you a sense of what this would look like and how it would work. 781 01:08:59,500 --> 01:09:04,700 So if you go to the next slide, we can see how that plays out for each meter size. 782 01:09:05,440 --> 01:09:11,280 So you can see it's a pretty wide range if you look at that right-hand column of the bottom table of charges. 783 01:09:12,140 --> 01:09:22,020 So a three-quarter inch charge, you know, if you're a resonance with a three-quarter inch meter, your charge would be $560 split over your two property tax bills. 784 01:09:23,000 --> 01:09:25,860 And the charge increases significantly with different meter sizes. 785 01:09:25,860 --> 01:09:31,880 And I'm going to talk a bit more about that as we go in terms of considerations around 786 01:09:31,880 --> 01:09:35,200 these charges, especially for those larger meter sizes. 787 01:09:36,520 --> 01:09:42,480 But that's essentially how we would go about the approach of determining the charges if 788 01:09:42,480 --> 01:09:45,760 they were to appear on the property tax bill. 789 01:09:46,680 --> 01:09:48,520 So you can go to the next one. 790 01:09:49,220 --> 01:09:51,400 So if we put a quick question, of course. 791 01:09:51,400 --> 01:09:55,200 If I have two meters, I'll get two charges, five meters, I'll get five. 792 01:09:56,060 --> 01:09:56,180 Next. 793 01:09:58,560 --> 01:10:00,460 And I, sorry, another naive question. 794 01:10:01,000 --> 01:10:04,360 The prepongence of meters is in the smaller range, right? 795 01:10:04,600 --> 01:10:07,380 I mean, the bell curve is kind of shifted to the above. 796 01:10:07,720 --> 01:10:08,160 Absolutely. 797 01:10:08,280 --> 01:10:12,160 There are only a handful of meters at that four inch and six inch size. 798 01:10:12,220 --> 01:10:20,580 There are quite a few two inch meters, but the majority would be, we have like a lot of residences 799 01:10:20,580 --> 01:10:26,700 in that three-quarter-in-train, commercial and residential, in the three-quarter, one, one-and-a-half, 800 01:10:26,880 --> 01:10:32,020 you know, is more like commercial and ag, master meters, things like that, and then as you get 801 01:10:32,020 --> 01:10:37,780 farther up, it's, you know, there's some public authority accounts, large master meter, or large ag, 802 01:10:37,940 --> 01:10:42,840 but yeah, there's only maybe 10 between the four and the six-inch meters. It's a very small number. 803 01:10:43,240 --> 01:10:47,220 Yeah, because further we get down, we get to have the detail about that. 804 01:10:47,220 --> 01:10:50,120 Yeah, is that actually did I put that in the next slide? 805 01:10:51,600 --> 01:10:52,600 Uh, maybe I took it out. 806 01:10:52,820 --> 01:10:57,120 I think I had it when I presented to the committee, the actual counts, and I might have removed it. 807 01:10:57,320 --> 01:10:59,720 But I could definitely provide that in a future presentation. 808 01:10:59,900 --> 01:11:03,340 More than just curiosity, it will be probably formed part of the outreach. 809 01:11:04,160 --> 01:11:11,040 Yes, and as we, um, in future presentations, we want to get specific about what the expected impacts would be. 810 01:11:11,100 --> 01:11:16,660 And so then it will absolutely be important to understand who those customers are at each meter size. 811 01:11:18,060 --> 01:11:28,640 So if we put all those cap charges on the property tax bill, this is what our future water bill rate increases could look like. 812 01:11:28,960 --> 01:11:34,740 So we've already adopted a 7.5% charge for fiscal year 26. 813 01:11:34,860 --> 01:11:38,980 So this is showing we would only need to actually enact a 5% increase. 814 01:11:38,980 --> 01:11:46,620 And then we would not need to go through another prop to 18 process and raise rates again until you can see 2031. 815 01:11:47,520 --> 01:11:59,760 So again these numbers are not finalized but I think that gives a pretty good indication of what future water bills could look like if we go this route. 816 01:12:02,100 --> 01:12:04,320 So if you go to the next slide. 817 01:12:04,320 --> 01:12:14,760 So an alternative here would be if we put only the debt associated with cap on the tax roll and leave the rest on water bills. 818 01:12:15,880 --> 01:12:25,400 So if we go through the same approach for determining charges, you can see that number in the top right is 2.25 million rather than the 4.3. 819 01:12:25,400 --> 01:12:38,160 So that's the debt and the coverage ratio, not the operation and maintenance costs divided among the same number of meter equivalents, the charge is then $293 per meter unit rather than the 560. 820 01:12:38,980 --> 01:12:50,520 So you can see then in the table below each charge by meter size, they still do get significant at the 6 inch size hover there lower than the previous method. 821 01:12:51,360 --> 01:12:54,420 I don't know if they're about half, but they're significantly lower. 822 01:12:55,560 --> 01:13:20,720 However, remember, then there would be water bill increases as well with this method because you're breaking the charges up over the two, so yeah, so for this method you can see we would continue with the adopted seven and half percent increase for water bill rates and charges in fiscal year 26 and then we would expect a 2% increase each year after that. 823 01:13:20,720 --> 01:13:25,500 So that would be sort of baseline inflation expectations in terms of increases. 824 01:13:25,880 --> 01:13:30,920 We wouldn't be looking at future large increases, like additional 7.5% increases, 825 01:13:31,540 --> 01:13:35,320 but it's not the zero that we were seeing in the previous method. 826 01:13:35,740 --> 01:13:40,000 So you're just defining the charges up here between the two collection mechanisms. 827 01:13:42,420 --> 01:13:43,920 So you can go to the next one. 828 01:13:43,920 --> 01:13:49,700 So, if you, yeah, we can look here a little bit 829 01:13:49,700 --> 01:13:52,520 at how these different options compare in terms 830 01:13:52,520 --> 01:13:54,700 of the water bill increases. 831 01:13:55,680 --> 01:13:59,660 So, the top two rows are what I just went through. 832 01:14:00,280 --> 01:14:04,060 So, all cap, all cap costs on property tax bill 833 01:14:04,060 --> 01:14:07,560 or debt costs on property tax bill 834 01:14:07,560 --> 01:14:10,160 and the other costs on the water bills. 835 01:14:10,260 --> 01:14:11,260 That's the middle row. 836 01:14:11,420 --> 01:14:13,380 And then there's also a third row there, 837 01:14:13,380 --> 01:14:20,980 which I haven't talked about yet, which is if all cap costs were recovered through water bills rather than through the tax roll. 838 01:14:21,200 --> 01:14:26,620 So in that third row, there would be no cap costs were covered through tax bills. 839 01:14:26,720 --> 01:14:36,740 And you can see that we would need additional 7.5% rate increases most likely if all costs were through water bills and then 2% after that. 840 01:14:43,100 --> 01:14:52,160 Um, so I want to give some ideas of what these monetary impacts could look like, although I definitely want to caveat this as, um, 841 01:14:52,680 --> 01:14:59,900 different, not finalized numbers, and as you can see here from sort of a three columns on the left, we're picking out sort of specific. 842 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:16,120 Customer types and characteristics. So, this is not representative of all of our customers. So, that top row, you can see is a three-quarter-hinge, single-family, residential customer, who uses about 10 units, 10 each CF a month. 843 01:15:16,580 --> 01:15:29,980 So, that is not representative of all single-family customers. So, we're assuming their current bills may be $150 and you can see the range that they could expect in terms of the increase across 844 01:15:29,980 --> 01:15:38,000 three methods. They're bill in 2032, so seven years from now could be between 170 or 845 01:15:38,000 --> 01:15:44,760 209 dollars. And you can see the same thing with a commercial customer. He uses about 15 846 01:15:44,760 --> 01:15:50,610 HCF and has a 1-inch meter. Again, it depends even where their base first peak. 847 01:15:51,860 --> 01:15:59,380 Divide is, but if they have a $200 bill currently, then it could be between 232 and $285 in 848 01:16:00,760 --> 01:16:06,520 So, this is just showing how those percentages that I showed on the previous side could play out. 849 01:16:07,760 --> 01:16:11,540 And, again, just for very specific examples of customers. 850 01:16:12,800 --> 01:16:15,460 Forgive me for digging in it. Could you go back one slide? 851 01:16:18,160 --> 01:16:23,460 And again, forgive me if I'm going to understand this, but it seems like the top line there. 852 01:16:23,460 --> 01:16:29,560 the first line, I would use the word front-end loaded that you're collecting the cost through 853 01:16:29,560 --> 01:16:37,620 the tax rolls much quicker than the other methods. 10, 0 increases required in those 854 01:16:37,620 --> 01:16:43,980 middle years. As you go down to the other alternative, the debt only method doesn't collect as much 855 01:16:43,980 --> 01:16:49,700 because you're only addressing the debt. I get that, but there's also a, there are 4 of, 856 01:16:50,420 --> 01:17:06,700 You know, a user charge that's going to be required, so you'd have a line theoretically dotted line underneath that showing the charge for the use, and then a last line, you're not front end loading it really at all. 857 01:17:06,700 --> 01:17:12,540 You're charging it all just based on use. Is that profile that front end loading tendency? 858 01:17:13,120 --> 01:17:19,080 Because you have a lot of users that aren't using water and they have meters. 859 01:17:20,040 --> 01:17:24,360 They would pay if they have a meter regardless of whether they're using it. 860 01:17:24,560 --> 01:17:26,200 Is that the dynamic of the front end loading? 861 01:17:27,420 --> 01:17:30,880 Well, the property tax charges would be every year. 862 01:17:31,560 --> 01:17:35,640 By front end loading, are you thinking that that's a one year charge? 863 01:17:35,640 --> 01:17:57,480 Yeah, I thought in the first, if maybe I'm just reading that, but you're getting a 5% increase on the, on the property taxes, and then 0 for the next four years, so this is a reflection on the water bill, so projected changes on the water bill, okay, and I mean to, I was, I was thinking of the, 864 01:18:00,000 --> 01:18:08,120 I was thinking that first line was all in property taxes, it is, but it's, it's, these percentages are, 865 01:18:08,140 --> 01:18:13,900 changes that would happen to the water bill itself. So if you're putting more on the tax bill 866 01:18:14,820 --> 01:18:19,120 it falls. I miss I miss Reddott. Yeah, thank you. What that helps? 867 01:18:20,200 --> 01:18:23,100 What I was going with that which will come up later is 868 01:18:24,200 --> 01:18:28,800 there's a I'm assuming intuitively there's a number of meters 869 01:18:29,500 --> 01:18:35,800 that are related to properties that aren't occupied and that's a growing number 870 01:18:35,800 --> 01:18:43,240 particularly residential properties. And if we don't put it through the meters, they're going to 871 01:18:43,240 --> 01:18:43,680 free ride. 872 01:18:46,210 --> 01:18:50,110 Is the field is the free. Well, if we don't put it on the property tax bill. 873 01:18:50,830 --> 01:18:54,110 Oh, like I said, if you put it. Yeah. Yeah. If we don't put it on the property tax bill. 874 01:18:54,830 --> 01:18:59,410 Exactly. It's on the fixed side of the meter as long as you have a meter. Right. Yeah. That's, 875 01:18:59,410 --> 01:19:04,090 that's where my, my naive, my naive today is coming through here. I'm just trying to figure out how, 876 01:19:04,090 --> 01:19:09,750 we assure because ultimately I think you got to do both. You got to have a mixed bag here to catch 877 01:19:09,750 --> 01:19:17,570 everybody. And I'm sensitive to the just by virtue of other experiences, you know, in the agencies 878 01:19:17,570 --> 01:19:26,410 that I'm supporting, I think there's a growing number of unoccupied properties or part-time if nothing else. 879 01:19:27,990 --> 01:19:29,030 Second homes. 880 01:19:29,050 --> 01:19:30,150 Second homes. 881 01:19:30,210 --> 01:19:30,990 Second homes. 882 01:19:30,990 --> 01:19:31,250 Second homes. 883 01:19:31,630 --> 01:19:32,770 You know. 884 01:19:32,770 --> 01:19:34,190 But aren't they going to pay anyway? 885 01:19:35,150 --> 01:19:36,110 I don't know. 886 01:19:36,230 --> 01:19:38,310 That's what I'm getting at. 887 01:19:38,770 --> 01:19:43,150 I think we got to have a mixed approach to catch everything else. 888 01:19:43,670 --> 01:19:43,930 Yeah. 889 01:19:44,170 --> 01:19:45,090 I'm getting ahead of you. 890 01:19:45,350 --> 01:19:53,710 And just I'll just mention that the ramp up, you know, what you're not seeing in this row is this ramp up that's occurring. 891 01:19:53,710 --> 01:19:59,470 and there's actually one year ahead of this in 25, in which we made it seven and a half of 892 01:19:59,470 --> 01:20:06,790 adjustment. So this whole ramp up is because we have to meet debt coverages before we get to the 893 01:20:06,790 --> 01:20:14,190 start-up of the project here in 2028. So this same revenue is being raised through the tax roll here 894 01:20:14,190 --> 01:20:18,970 and so she's not showing up on this. So that's what that ramp, that's what that front end loading. 895 01:20:18,970 --> 01:20:22,330 Yeah, I misread the chart, so thanks. 896 01:20:24,050 --> 01:20:29,170 But either, either, Patrick, I want to make sure that I understand what you're, your point 897 01:20:29,170 --> 01:20:34,930 in a way, but the houses that are vacant are part-timers and whatever they are. 898 01:20:35,550 --> 01:20:43,470 If we did all costs all the cap on their water bill, they still have a water bill, they still 899 01:20:43,470 --> 01:20:46,170 have to pay their water bill, whether they're part-time or not, right? 900 01:20:46,170 --> 01:20:49,330 as long as all the cab charges go on the fixed side of the fixed. 901 01:20:51,330 --> 01:20:51,630 Yes. 902 01:20:53,310 --> 01:20:54,270 Which thing? 903 01:20:57,310 --> 01:20:58,030 That's the current. 904 01:20:58,110 --> 01:20:58,670 That's the current. 905 01:20:58,970 --> 01:20:59,170 That's the current thinking right now. 906 01:20:59,210 --> 01:20:59,690 That's the current. 907 01:20:59,690 --> 01:21:00,290 Either way we go. 908 01:21:00,810 --> 01:21:02,810 That's the case that I just assumed it was. 909 01:21:02,910 --> 01:21:04,330 That understanding of which I didn't. 910 01:21:04,390 --> 01:21:05,170 The new clarification now. 911 01:21:05,230 --> 01:21:05,490 Thanks. 912 01:21:05,590 --> 01:21:07,490 Because I just assumed it would be. 913 01:21:07,970 --> 01:21:09,530 So then because back to my earlier point, 914 01:21:09,530 --> 01:21:11,590 either way they're going to pay, 915 01:21:11,690 --> 01:21:14,390 whether they're vacant or not, 916 01:21:14,390 --> 01:21:16,650 whether it's, they're still going to pay. 917 01:21:17,310 --> 01:21:17,350 OK. 918 01:21:17,530 --> 01:21:20,430 Yeah, I was, again, I think he was all used. 919 01:21:20,450 --> 01:21:21,450 It was always like used. 920 01:21:21,450 --> 01:21:22,430 No, no, no, no, no, no. 921 01:21:22,430 --> 01:21:24,730 No, no, no, no, thank you for clarifying. 922 01:21:24,930 --> 01:21:26,730 Because that's, so that was my point. 923 01:21:26,870 --> 01:21:28,950 Is it either way they're going to pay? 924 01:21:30,330 --> 01:21:33,510 Yeah, I mean, I get sorry, miss, I don't need to stick 925 01:21:33,510 --> 01:21:34,430 all of your privilege. 926 01:21:34,430 --> 01:21:37,350 I think the very first slide it says it's either way 927 01:21:37,350 --> 01:21:39,970 it's based for second slide. 928 01:21:40,330 --> 01:21:41,150 That says it's, yeah. 929 01:21:41,850 --> 01:21:44,010 I'm sorry, I'm looking for the sample water 930 01:21:45,330 --> 01:21:48,230 Oh, that's farther down, I think. 931 01:21:48,410 --> 01:21:49,070 Oh, here we go. 932 01:21:49,310 --> 01:21:51,850 And I think of it as we're producing a water supply here. 933 01:21:51,910 --> 01:21:53,650 We're not actually producing water to distribute. 934 01:21:54,190 --> 01:21:56,750 And those are the two ways of the business that are different. 935 01:21:57,350 --> 01:22:02,210 And you have here values of, you know, water use. 936 01:22:02,250 --> 01:22:05,750 But that really doesn't affect the cap portion of the revenue need. 937 01:22:06,190 --> 01:22:09,130 It's affecting other parts of the water bill. 938 01:22:09,130 --> 01:22:12,690 Because there are water rates and so they do have an impact. 939 01:22:12,690 --> 01:22:16,530 but they're not related to the revenue we need for CAP. 940 01:22:17,430 --> 01:22:20,770 Yeah, the purpose of the HCF numbers on there 941 01:22:20,770 --> 01:22:22,890 is just to characterize the type of user 942 01:22:22,890 --> 01:22:26,010 that we're talking about in a relation to a typical bill amount. 943 01:22:34,400 --> 01:22:34,880 What's next? 944 01:22:36,020 --> 01:22:40,940 Right, so we just talked about potential financial implications 945 01:22:41,480 --> 01:22:43,520 of changes in water bills. 946 01:22:44,100 --> 01:22:47,700 So then I also want to touch on the property tax charges. 947 01:22:47,700 --> 01:22:54,700 So these are the two different methods that we've been talking about, these are the numbers that I showed on the previous slide. 948 01:22:54,900 --> 01:22:57,180 I've just showed them side by side here. 949 01:22:57,840 --> 01:23:00,460 Oh, and there's the meter count column as well. 950 01:23:00,880 --> 01:23:06,760 So yeah, you can see at the 4-inch and 6-inch meter size, a total of 11 accounts. 951 01:23:09,200 --> 01:23:15,520 And so this is just showing a comparison of the charge amount between the two different methods at the different meter size. 952 01:23:15,520 --> 01:23:18,700 Again, keeping in mind these are not finalized numbers. 953 01:23:22,340 --> 01:23:23,160 You can continue. 954 01:23:23,840 --> 01:23:25,220 Yeah, I'll just one, I'm sorry. 955 01:23:25,400 --> 01:23:27,220 One more comment on the six inch. 956 01:23:27,220 --> 01:23:32,760 Most of these are mobile and parks that have a master 957 01:23:32,760 --> 01:23:37,100 meter that have 100 plus units to divide this cost up. 958 01:23:37,240 --> 01:23:41,080 So it does look worse from if you're thinking of it 959 01:23:41,080 --> 01:23:44,340 as a single meter, but these are really multi-family 960 01:23:44,340 --> 01:23:52,260 residential is one institutional customer, one institutional customer one industrial customer 961 01:23:52,260 --> 01:23:58,340 on the six inch too. And so does that divide out like in a meter equivalency 962 01:23:59,180 --> 01:24:05,320 faction or like if I'm in a mobile home park is my burden the same as like single 963 01:24:05,320 --> 01:24:10,320 family residents or would it be okay? Well you so or maybe less I think yeah. Yeah I mean it 964 01:24:10,320 --> 01:24:14,100 depends on how many units are behind the meter in terms of how it gets divided up to individual 965 01:24:14,100 --> 01:24:19,980 units, but the purpose of the meter-requivalency approach is that yes, it's equal for everyone 966 01:24:19,980 --> 01:24:22,160 to regardless of your meter size. 967 01:24:30,310 --> 01:24:35,010 So the same way that we looked at potential impacts of changes 968 01:24:35,010 --> 01:24:41,330 in water bills, this is potential impacts related to the property tax bills. And again, I want to 969 01:24:41,330 --> 01:24:48,810 call out that this is a subset of customers. We're looking at a particular examples here. So you can 970 01:24:48,810 --> 01:24:55,470 the first row is a single family residence with a three-quarter inch meter and we're thinking 971 01:24:55,470 --> 01:25:02,950 their property tax bill is about $12,000. So depending on the two methods that we're considering, 972 01:25:03,350 --> 01:25:09,410 they might see a two to five percent increase in their property tax bill against split over the 973 01:25:09,410 --> 01:25:15,730 two bills. It's the same approach for the other free rows that we're looking at. You can see 974 01:25:15,730 --> 01:25:19,070 I think this is true really with all our customer classes. 975 01:25:19,610 --> 01:25:25,090 There's likely a very large variation in those property tax bills within each of these 976 01:25:25,090 --> 01:25:26,070 customer classes. 977 01:25:26,730 --> 01:25:32,110 So you can see the commercial and agricultural to the examples that I've chosen, their property 978 01:25:32,110 --> 01:25:35,170 tax bills are actually pretty similar to the residential example. 979 01:25:35,770 --> 01:25:40,710 However, that probably isn't true for all of the customers within that class, right? 980 01:25:40,730 --> 01:25:45,450 There's probably a huge variation in those customers and what their property tax 981 01:25:45,450 --> 01:25:50,290 spell is based on what their parcel looks like and how it's developed in the value of it. 982 01:25:50,970 --> 01:25:56,950 So keep that in mind when reviewing the impacts here and considering this table, this 983 01:25:56,950 --> 01:26:02,910 is just an initial review of what a couple of impacts could look like. 984 01:26:03,490 --> 01:26:09,450 We'll get into the details of this more in subsequent presentations and I'll also get into 985 01:26:09,450 --> 01:26:14,070 some of the details of why we can't give you exact numbers right now because there are 986 01:26:14,070 --> 01:26:17,470 applications, and this analysis that we'll have to work through. 987 01:26:23,760 --> 01:26:27,920 And so yeah, I just wanted to touch on the fact that the large meters, 988 01:26:29,980 --> 01:26:30,960 those do look 989 01:26:30,960 --> 01:26:36,160 like very high charges, however, the characteristics of those accounts are very different 990 01:26:36,160 --> 01:26:39,760 than an individual residence or even an individual business. 991 01:26:40,540 --> 01:26:47,820 These tend to be maybe a master meter mobile home park that has 100 or more units behind 992 01:26:47,820 --> 01:26:54,840 it. There's a very large school campground, very large agricultural properties. These are very 993 01:26:54,840 --> 01:27:00,720 different customers when thinking about how they compare to like a single family resident 994 01:27:00,720 --> 01:27:06,480 in their individual business. So we will have to work through a couple examples to figure out 995 01:27:06,480 --> 01:27:15,840 whether those property tax values and debt-only method values make sense when we start investigating 996 01:27:15,840 --> 01:27:21,200 who these customers are and what their property taxes are to consider whether the numbers that 997 01:27:21,200 --> 01:27:25,900 you're seeing there are a significant impact or not, but I wouldn't come to that conclusion 998 01:27:25,900 --> 01:27:28,920 just based on seeing high numbers there. 999 01:27:33,000 --> 01:27:35,020 Okay, so yeah, let's talk about the challenges a little 1000 01:27:35,020 --> 01:27:41,040 bit. So I know that we've come across this in many of the other analyses that we've done, 1001 01:27:41,620 --> 01:27:46,360 but you have to remember when we're talking about the property tax, the bill approach that is 1002 01:27:46,360 --> 01:27:52,820 based on your parcel, right, and we know that we have many parcels where there are multiple 1003 01:27:52,820 --> 01:27:56,740 meters associated with that parcel, especially when you're thinking about those larger 1004 01:27:56,740 --> 01:28:04,320 meters, where maybe you have an HOA that is responsible for many of the resonances and 1005 01:28:04,320 --> 01:28:08,460 then you have a landscape meter and it can, it's not necessarily obvious how you should 1006 01:28:08,460 --> 01:28:13,980 divide that charge among the different meters when you're trying to say you have a total 1007 01:28:13,980 --> 01:28:18,920 property tax value, how do I then divide that among the meters in terms of applying the 1008 01:28:18,920 --> 01:28:23,560 charges and figuring out whether this is going to be a significant impact to those users 1009 01:28:23,560 --> 01:28:29,020 or not? So that's something that we're going to have to work through. We do have some insights into 1010 01:28:29,020 --> 01:28:36,400 that based on the exercises that we've gone through with CAP, or not CAP. I'm sorry, the GSA, 1011 01:28:37,380 --> 01:28:43,540 however, that's been focused on agricultural customers. So there is a lot that will have to work 1012 01:28:43,540 --> 01:28:46,300 through for our master meter customers, 1013 01:28:47,560 --> 01:28:51,280 but we do have some ideas about methods that we could apply 1014 01:28:51,280 --> 01:28:54,540 to figure that out, but it will take some work 1015 01:28:54,540 --> 01:28:56,180 and some staff time. 1016 01:28:59,400 --> 01:29:01,060 Another issue we're going to have to work 1017 01:29:01,060 --> 01:29:03,900 through is that, as we started looking 1018 01:29:03,900 --> 01:29:07,980 at those larger meters and who they are, 1019 01:29:08,200 --> 01:29:12,100 we noticed that we can't just take the assess 1020 01:29:12,100 --> 01:29:23,560 value of those parcels to determine whether the amounts that we're looking at would be a significant impact because we see exemptions that bring down that value. 1021 01:29:24,240 --> 01:29:34,540 So we just have to think about what is the right number for us to use when thinking about the impacts of that parcel when comparing their property tax bill to the potential increase that we're talking about. 1022 01:29:34,540 --> 01:29:37,180 something that will investigate further. 1023 01:29:42,660 --> 01:29:45,380 And then just again touching on the fact that we need to 1024 01:29:45,380 --> 01:29:50,080 look into whether these numbers are an impact or not. 1025 01:29:50,080 --> 01:29:51,120 Thank you, backwards, no. 1026 01:29:51,300 --> 01:29:58,260 No, you're good. I had that slide multiple phases. So the benefits of each approach that I'll just 1027 01:29:58,260 --> 01:29:59,380 touch on quickly. 1028 01:30:01,000 --> 01:30:08,380 So, having cap on the tax bills does have a couple of benefits that I want to talk about. 1029 01:30:09,460 --> 01:30:28,720 So, it's a smaller impact. In a way when you think about it, the percentage increase that we're expecting, you know, if you're residents, that two to five percent increase on your tax bill versus, you know, several years of seven and a half or even two percent on your water bill, it can feel like a smaller increase there. 1030 01:30:29,500 --> 01:30:35,040 Also, we have to remember that we often hear from our customers that there were water bills 1031 01:30:35,040 --> 01:30:35,780 are really complicated. 1032 01:30:35,960 --> 01:30:41,360 They have several fixed charges on there already, adding in other fixed charge and complicating 1033 01:30:41,360 --> 01:30:45,840 water bills more is definitely, it's something we can do, but I think we have to really 1034 01:30:45,840 --> 01:30:51,220 think about how customers would interpret that and how it would affect their ability to understand 1035 01:30:51,220 --> 01:30:52,380 their water bill. 1036 01:30:53,140 --> 01:30:57,490 And sort of the same idea there, we also hear from many customers, especially during times of 1037 01:30:57,490 --> 01:31:01,290 out that they feel like even if they reduce their water usage, they don't see a reduction in 1038 01:31:01,290 --> 01:31:06,330 their water bill because there are so many fixed charges. So adding a new fixed charge could 1039 01:31:06,330 --> 01:31:11,570 further exacerbate that existing problem. So I think we just want to be very cognizant of those 1040 01:31:11,570 --> 01:31:18,290 things as potential benefits to having any charges on the tax bill rather than water bills. 1041 01:31:20,090 --> 01:31:27,950 can go ahead, Bob. However, of course, this was sort of touched on earlier if we have the 1042 01:31:27,950 --> 01:31:32,610 charges on water bills instead then we are keeping the charges all in place and we don't 1043 01:31:32,610 --> 01:31:37,390 have necessarily transparency concerns, although as I'll talk about in a couple of slides we 1044 01:31:37,390 --> 01:31:41,970 do want to do a lot of public outreach, but of course that's something that people could point out. 1045 01:31:42,210 --> 01:31:45,810 We don't want people to feel like we're trying to hide these charges by putting them somewhere else. 1046 01:31:46,450 --> 01:32:01,750 Also, of course, if it's on the water bill, then you could say the direct beneficiary at the time is paying rather than having it on the property bill where the person who lives there might not be the same as the person who owns or pays the property bill. 1047 01:32:03,150 --> 01:32:04,190 That's it. 1048 01:32:04,390 --> 01:32:05,670 Can go ahead. 1049 01:32:06,650 --> 01:32:07,390 So outreach. 1050 01:32:07,950 --> 01:32:09,990 There's a lot of text on this slide, 1051 01:32:10,130 --> 01:32:11,970 but all it's really saying is that 1052 01:32:12,370 --> 01:32:14,750 we plan through the rest of this year, 1053 01:32:14,850 --> 01:32:16,650 the rest of this calendar year, 1054 01:32:17,070 --> 01:32:17,990 to conduct outreach. 1055 01:32:18,270 --> 01:32:19,870 We want to make sure people understand 1056 01:32:19,870 --> 01:32:22,030 what it is that we're proposing, 1057 01:32:22,930 --> 01:32:23,930 so they feel that it's, 1058 01:32:24,610 --> 01:32:26,050 you know, we're being transparent, 1059 01:32:26,430 --> 01:32:27,950 but also so that they can provide feedback 1060 01:32:27,950 --> 01:32:29,510 and identify any additional issues 1061 01:32:29,510 --> 01:32:36,210 or complication so we may not have considered. So we're baking in a lot of time to get and consider 1062 01:32:36,210 --> 01:32:41,870 that feedback and part of the way that we're going to solicit that is by telling people to 1063 01:32:41,870 --> 01:32:47,750 come to board meetings and provide their input and we're expecting to do that through bill inserts, 1064 01:32:48,810 --> 01:32:55,130 you know, posting on social media, sort of all of our usual outreach mechanisms and we'll have 1065 01:32:55,130 --> 01:32:59,130 a more detailed outreach plan that we'll share with you. 1066 01:33:00,230 --> 01:33:01,410 You can go to the next time. 1067 01:33:03,470 --> 01:33:04,150 Okay, timeline. 1068 01:33:05,410 --> 01:33:08,010 So we basically have this calendar year. 1069 01:33:08,430 --> 01:33:19,630 We're the next couple meetings I want to continue talking with all of you about the methods for this approach and work through some of these details that I've mentioned. 1070 01:33:20,090 --> 01:33:26,490 And then we would really have the bulk of this year to just get input from people and part of the reason for that is because 1071 01:33:26,490 --> 01:33:33,230 If we were to move forward with this, we wouldn't engage in a proctor 18 method until spring 1072 01:33:33,230 --> 01:33:34,030 of next year. 1073 01:33:34,370 --> 01:33:38,550 So we might as well fill that intermediate time with public outreach. 1074 01:33:39,630 --> 01:33:44,970 So that it would be April of next year when we would go through the proctor 18 process and 1075 01:33:44,970 --> 01:33:50,190 then June when we would actually adopt these charges that we've been talking about. 1076 01:33:52,150 --> 01:33:53,430 I think that's it. 1077 01:33:53,430 --> 01:34:13,890 I do want to flash back to the previous board meeting, let's see here, and just pop up a graph that has some relation to this. 1078 01:34:13,890 --> 01:34:14,590 The revenue? 1079 01:34:16,110 --> 01:34:16,430 Yeah. 1080 01:34:16,890 --> 01:34:18,110 That's what I was thinking about. 1081 01:34:19,590 --> 01:34:20,230 Sorry. 1082 01:34:21,650 --> 01:34:29,450 So this was presented on the 8th and as you call it, we went through the final outlook. 1083 01:34:31,010 --> 01:34:38,670 And one of the things in the staff report that we talk about is, you know, these higher levels, 1084 01:34:39,370 --> 01:34:45,090 so the oranges that capped at, but these higher levels of existing debt kind of derived 1085 01:34:45,090 --> 01:34:54,850 this cost for short periods, so for seven years here. And then in 2036, it starts to decline 1086 01:34:54,850 --> 01:34:59,810 because these, these debt starts to drop off and then in 2037 it really declines. 1087 01:34:59,930 --> 01:35:05,350 Pauli you weren't here and I do want to go over this with you, but this concept of the 1088 01:35:05,350 --> 01:35:14,730 tax rule is meant to bridge this period, not so much beyond that. So in other words, we would 1089 01:35:14,730 --> 01:35:25,930 start ramping up to 2029 and then maintain that tax rule charge throughout 2036 and then 1090 01:35:25,930 --> 01:35:33,750 2037 we'll remove it. And this has an interesting messaging benefit in that we can really 1091 01:35:33,750 --> 01:35:40,070 in our outreach kind of describe that you know it's going to be painful for a while and we're 1092 01:35:40,070 --> 01:35:44,990 this only for seven years and then we're going to remove this charge and then we'll have 1093 01:35:44,990 --> 01:35:51,350 a project that has benefits for 50 years beyond that and so from my perspective it has 1094 01:35:51,350 --> 01:35:57,470 a really good message that you know you're going to feel some pain for a little while and 1095 01:35:57,470 --> 01:36:02,010 then beyond that we're going to get the benefits for 50 years. 1096 01:36:02,700 --> 01:36:08,510 One of the other things that I showed was this long term chart so this is 2037 and this 1097 01:36:08,510 --> 01:36:17,250 where we are right now. And these are, you know, these are revenues based on whatever method. 1098 01:36:17,410 --> 01:36:24,210 So if we click, this doesn't necessarily look at the two different methods, but this is the revenue 1099 01:36:24,210 --> 01:36:29,090 we need, whether it's coming through the tax roll or through the, through the water bill. 1100 01:36:29,870 --> 01:36:35,270 But what happens is this ramp up period that you saw that was, if it's all in the water bill, 1101 01:36:35,270 --> 01:36:46,910 7%, 7%, 7%, 7%, 7%, 7%, 7%, but then it sort of softens right here in 2028 or 2029. 1102 01:36:48,430 --> 01:36:55,230 And if you look at this from an inflation adjusted standpoint in 2025 dollars, you can 1103 01:36:55,230 --> 01:36:56,530 really see what's happening here. 1104 01:36:56,970 --> 01:37:02,110 We're raising money for the first four years, we're raising revenues, trying to get them 1105 01:37:02,110 --> 01:37:09,170 to the target and then once we get there we're basically just staying up with inflation so it's 1106 01:37:09,170 --> 01:37:15,710 kind of flat when you look at it in 2020 but five dollars but then what happens in 2037 is we actually 1107 01:37:17,530 --> 01:37:25,010 the other costs have have risen over time and but the debt drops off and so you end up back 1108 01:37:25,010 --> 01:37:28,970 Pretty close. It's hard to see on here, but pretty close to where we were 1109 01:37:31,450 --> 01:37:34,990 $25 in 2037. So 1110 01:37:34,990 --> 01:37:37,210 So that's that's the story 1111 01:37:40,220 --> 01:37:40,660 I 1112 01:37:41,840 --> 01:37:44,700 I guess we can talk about later. I just 1113 01:37:45,260 --> 01:37:52,500 Tonight I would just say it seems like again either way. They're gonna pay and so I would be looking to keep it is 1114 01:37:52,500 --> 01:37:59,300 it straight forward as possible. Yes, the bills are confusing. Yes, the fixed side is confusing, 1115 01:37:59,680 --> 01:38:04,300 that I also think that I've always been in a chapter of the fixed side. I think it's good 1116 01:38:04,300 --> 01:38:10,200 it is fair. And so I know we'll no more on it, and that's why we can certainly prove to be 1117 01:38:10,200 --> 01:38:15,160 I'll be where I'm run. It just seems to put it all on the water bills, so everybody knows what 1118 01:38:15,160 --> 01:38:19,860 they're paying the money. Because if you, if you, if the hybrid approach seems like it could be 1119 01:38:19,860 --> 01:38:30,900 And if you put it all on me, on the property tax, then why would we do that if you just put it on the water bill? 1120 01:38:34,010 --> 01:38:34,750 I don't know. 1121 01:38:34,810 --> 01:38:35,110 We're not. 1122 01:38:35,450 --> 01:38:35,970 We're not. 1123 01:38:35,970 --> 01:38:36,150 We're not. 1124 01:38:36,630 --> 01:38:39,930 We should be in danger. 1125 01:38:40,070 --> 01:38:40,710 I'll give you my feedback. 1126 01:38:41,730 --> 01:38:44,230 I'm just, I don't, I don't quite get even. 1127 01:38:44,310 --> 01:38:46,670 Can talk about it later, I guess, because I wasn't here in the last week. 1128 01:38:48,110 --> 01:38:52,650 Yeah, the point of discussing it today is to get, 1129 01:38:52,650 --> 01:38:58,470 feedback so if you have feedback yeah we we're interested all on the water 1130 01:38:58,470 --> 01:39:04,230 bill but I look forward to hearing war yeah so if you want feedback yeah I 1131 01:39:04,230 --> 01:39:08,310 think it's it's it's odd it strikes me as the exact opposite or trying to do a 1132 01:39:08,310 --> 01:39:12,470 GSA right we're trying to move from a tax based approach to metering and now 1133 01:39:12,470 --> 01:39:14,870 trying to get away from meters and you know to a tax based approach and I think 1134 01:39:14,870 --> 01:39:22,630 we're going to run into some of similar problems with you know what if I want to 1135 01:39:22,630 --> 01:39:30,570 tax users. I do, while it's not the intention, I think it is just trying to hide the cost, 1136 01:39:30,790 --> 01:39:35,050 right? We're trying to defer the monthly annoyance of having my water bill be high and saying, 1137 01:39:35,250 --> 01:39:38,990 oh, well, I'll only see it kind of once and might pay attention to it twice a year and then 1138 01:39:38,990 --> 01:39:44,790 hopefully forget about it. And it does seem to kind of confuse it even more. I know our 1139 01:39:44,790 --> 01:39:52,530 structures confusing, but this just adds a whole other layer to it. It seems like, um, so, yeah, 1140 01:39:52,650 --> 01:39:58,690 I don't know that I've seen a great benefit presented on it just other than it makes your water 1141 01:39:58,690 --> 01:40:04,370 bill a little less monthly and makes your property tax plug a lot. Um, but yeah, that's my thought. 1142 01:40:04,490 --> 01:40:10,520 He said it better than me. All right, but I'm sorry. Go ahead, Patrick. I was just saying I'll say 1143 01:40:10,520 --> 01:40:17,040 more poorly than all of you, but just to be clear by point earlier was that I really believe 1144 01:40:17,040 --> 01:40:22,520 there's a growing population, excuse me, a growing population of non-resident property owners. 1145 01:40:24,400 --> 01:40:30,540 And I put in that category property owners with meters, and I just want to be sure that we're 1146 01:40:30,540 --> 01:40:39,140 thinking about equity. The sense of unit users that may be different than property owners, 1147 01:40:39,140 --> 01:40:44,240 and I don't pretend to know that nuance and I'm sure there's statistics we can take out to figure that one out. 1148 01:40:44,540 --> 01:40:45,600 But that's my point. 1149 01:40:46,620 --> 01:40:49,760 The other thing that dawned on me is there's two presentations. 1150 01:40:50,480 --> 01:40:54,400 There's two schedules of activity that are, 1151 01:40:54,940 --> 01:40:58,160 but basically represent pain to the community. 1152 01:40:58,340 --> 01:41:01,200 One is the disruption from the infrastructure, 1153 01:41:04,000 --> 01:41:05,840 and the second is the pain from the cost. 1154 01:41:06,480 --> 01:41:12,060 So I think intuitively I would think they put those things as close together as you can. 1155 01:41:13,280 --> 01:41:26,300 It will make sense to the community more so than disrupting the environment and their commute to work and their properties and trenching and all those things and then making them pay later. 1156 01:41:26,920 --> 01:41:29,340 I don't think people would kind of get that. 1157 01:41:29,860 --> 01:41:31,600 So that's just a thought to consider. 1158 01:41:31,760 --> 01:41:53,830 And the last point I would make is I don't pretend to understand this when either is the benefits of this overall cat project uniform to all of the users is there is a more benefit to others and not in your comment mat made me think of that is that this is really not a distribution plan. 1159 01:41:54,390 --> 01:41:55,890 It's a storage plan. 1160 01:41:55,890 --> 01:42:02,430 So, who benefits from storage is, is it uniform? Everybody does the same or is it different? 1161 01:42:03,590 --> 01:42:06,970 And I don't pretend to know the answer to that question, but that might also inform. 1162 01:42:08,190 --> 01:42:09,850 How do you go about these rate things? 1163 01:42:10,610 --> 01:42:13,650 Well, I'd be bothered to state water. I would also put it in the property text bill. 1164 01:42:13,850 --> 01:42:16,830 I'm sure if it is same reason because it was a huge capital expense. 1165 01:42:18,070 --> 01:42:22,090 It was not put on the property. I was putting the water bill. 1166 01:42:22,430 --> 01:42:24,170 Really? I always felt it should have been. 1167 01:42:24,170 --> 01:42:30,310 Yeah, and so we're kind of facing the same question you're I I supported I really like the idea of it on the property tax bill 1168 01:42:30,310 --> 01:42:33,710 So so do I I don't want to money to water, but that 1169 01:42:33,710 --> 01:42:39,350 $20 million or clear well should be at a profit tax bill too, but you know 1170 01:42:39,350 --> 01:42:42,070 Yeah, but I'll tell you why it's because 1171 01:42:43,590 --> 01:42:45,770 Injecting water and drug and water has a universal 1172 01:42:46,730 --> 01:42:52,590 benefit that lasts for years and it's for decades. I mean it depends on when we extract it 1173 01:42:52,590 --> 01:43:04,870 We decide not to extract it, wet your dryers, but if we put it on the bill, the person who's there that day pays, whereas you put it on the proper text bill and the owners who have an enduring equity in the valley pay. 1174 01:43:05,270 --> 01:43:07,730 And I think that's where the benefit of this project lies. 1175 01:43:11,370 --> 01:43:14,730 And you always did things you could say, why should I put it on the... 1176 01:43:14,730 --> 01:43:16,390 I do want to... 1177 01:43:16,390 --> 01:43:18,190 I'm still waiting for all the information. 1178 01:43:20,390 --> 01:43:31,090 I do want to just say that the cost of service analysis that has to be done is not going 1179 01:43:31,090 --> 01:43:37,150 to be based on whether someone is an absentee owner or it's not going to take that into consideration 1180 01:43:38,470 --> 01:43:46,230 or it's not going to change based on like the GSA where you're going to make the comment 1181 01:43:46,230 --> 01:43:48,650 that we're going from an estimate to a meter. 1182 01:43:49,410 --> 01:43:52,090 It's always going to be based on the meter, whether we're 1183 01:43:52,090 --> 01:43:54,850 collecting it through the water bill or the tax rule, 1184 01:43:55,090 --> 01:43:56,110 it's the same charge. 1185 01:43:56,590 --> 01:43:58,110 Same people are going to get the charge. 1186 01:43:58,630 --> 01:44:01,650 So there's really no differences just the method in which we're 1187 01:44:01,650 --> 01:44:02,970 collecting that revenue. 1188 01:44:04,830 --> 01:44:09,610 And so much like Matt said, and I think one of the other 1189 01:44:09,610 --> 01:44:12,410 reasons to do this, not that we're hiding it, 1190 01:44:12,410 --> 01:44:17,130 but there is a psychological impact 1191 01:44:17,130 --> 01:44:19,830 to seeing your expecting a water bill 1192 01:44:19,830 --> 01:44:22,070 to be something and seeing it much higher. 1193 01:44:22,770 --> 01:44:25,890 Whereas I think there's a less of an impact 1194 01:44:25,890 --> 01:44:27,730 when you look at your property bill 1195 01:44:27,730 --> 01:44:32,750 and you say, yeah, my house is worth 1.6 million dollars 1196 01:44:32,750 --> 01:44:36,650 and I just got an extra $250, $250, $250, $180 a year 1197 01:44:36,650 --> 01:44:38,510 and my, is that bad? 1198 01:44:38,650 --> 01:44:40,170 I mean, it kind of gives you a perspective 1199 01:44:40,170 --> 01:44:46,570 of the value of the project in terms of the property values and the value. 1200 01:44:48,090 --> 01:44:52,530 Well, I would just say there is a little difference in who will pay the bill because we 1201 01:44:53,670 --> 01:44:59,130 have corporations that buy houses all over and rent them as a business investment. 1202 01:45:00,000 --> 01:45:10,760 We have, you know, 10, 10, it's versus owner. Yes, yes, yes, non-resident property, and yes, again, I think the equity this project lies more with the land than it does with your water bill. 1203 01:45:14,180 --> 01:45:14,660 Agreed. 1204 01:45:14,780 --> 01:45:17,080 I will read into the record. 1205 01:45:17,640 --> 01:45:27,560 At least a portion of the comment from Will Carlson referring to the method that we just presented. I believe this is a terrible idea. 1206 01:45:27,560 --> 01:45:34,180 this is being used currently for the GSA. Many taxpayers still don't know they're being 1207 01:45:34,180 --> 01:45:38,740 billed with this method. Most never look at their itemized portion of their tax bill. 1208 01:45:39,660 --> 01:45:46,900 Many I have spoken with were surprised to find this among the other many items on their tax bill. 1209 01:45:47,640 --> 01:45:54,600 It should be clearly visible to the repairs. What the cost is for? It should be 1210 01:45:54,600 --> 01:46:00,320 clear to rate pairs that this is a necessary and valuable step taken on their behalf. 1211 01:46:01,160 --> 01:46:06,700 CVWD should also identify steps it is taking to mitigate these costs, EGA, hiring 1212 01:46:06,700 --> 01:46:08,780 free or other cost saving measures. 1213 01:46:09,840 --> 01:46:16,680 We need to sell the necessity of the and value of this cap program, not hide the cost in 1214 01:46:17,180 --> 01:46:21,100 the tax in the rate pairs tax bill, because that's a little grunt. 1215 01:46:21,100 --> 01:46:27,760 And I think that to speak to his comments, I think that's what all this outreach for the next year is all about. 1216 01:46:27,780 --> 01:46:28,220 Exactly. 1217 01:46:32,200 --> 01:46:32,380 Okay. 1218 01:46:33,100 --> 01:46:33,800 Any more questions? 1219 01:46:34,100 --> 01:46:35,240 Are we good? 1220 01:46:35,580 --> 01:46:39,040 Then we move on to item number 7C. 1221 01:46:39,580 --> 01:46:44,320 Consider what a supply impact fee from information and presentation by Mason. 1222 01:46:51,060 --> 01:46:52,440 I'm sleeping on the screen. 1223 01:46:52,440 --> 01:46:53,640 I'm sleeping on the wheel here. 1224 01:46:53,640 --> 01:47:11,000 This is something that we've been working towards with the allocation that we've just recently adopted and the water intensification methodology that we just adopted. 1225 01:47:11,340 --> 01:47:20,660 So now this is kind of the final piece of that work in that we're looking at what would be an impact fee for an intensification. 1226 01:47:20,660 --> 01:47:23,340 And so with that, I'll give it a word, and me, so. 1227 01:47:23,780 --> 01:47:32,940 OK, so I want to start by talking about supply reliability and get a little bit of background 1228 01:47:32,940 --> 01:47:37,400 to sort of set the scene for why we're talking about an impact fee here. 1229 01:47:37,880 --> 01:47:41,820 So we understand why it would be useful and necessary. 1230 01:47:42,920 --> 01:47:49,720 And then we can go into sort of options for addressing that reliability stress and how the 1231 01:47:49,720 --> 01:47:56,620 impact fee, then fits into it, and then another outreach piece to consider, and one 1232 01:47:56,620 --> 01:47:58,400 of the timing of that would occur. 1233 01:48:00,120 --> 01:48:01,400 So, feel good at the first line. 1234 01:48:02,460 --> 01:48:05,300 So you've seen versions of this graph in the past. 1235 01:48:05,440 --> 01:48:12,100 What we're looking at here is customer demand in times of extended drought. 1236 01:48:12,280 --> 01:48:16,620 So that's why that bar is kind of high, I think it's about 4,200 in your feet. 1237 01:48:17,640 --> 01:48:20,560 So less than we would expect a normal or wet conditions. 1238 01:48:21,740 --> 01:48:27,480 And the shaded red portion there is showing the portion of that demand, which is 1239 01:48:27,480 --> 01:48:33,160 rescind vulnerable, in times of extended drought, meaning it might be difficult to get sufficient 1240 01:48:33,160 --> 01:48:38,800 supply to actually serve those customers so in the past, you know, we had to go purchase supplemental 1241 01:48:38,800 --> 01:48:46,380 water, would be an example. And so the graph on the bar on the left is the current demand, and then 1242 01:48:46,380 --> 01:48:54,140 On the right that blue bar shows proposed development as an additional stress on that existing 1243 01:48:56,420 --> 01:49:01,600 potentially difficult to meet need that you can see in that rate-chated portion. 1244 01:49:03,740 --> 01:49:09,020 We want to talk about this a little bit if you go to the next slide. 1245 01:49:10,200 --> 01:49:14,080 I think we all know climate is becoming more variable. 1246 01:49:14,280 --> 01:49:18,260 We're seeing these extremes right of wet and dry periods. 1247 01:49:18,840 --> 01:49:23,500 As you can see in this graph, the state water project is a great example of this. 1248 01:49:23,540 --> 01:49:28,720 It's becoming more difficult to actually get delivery of our allocation there. 1249 01:49:28,940 --> 01:49:34,500 So if we're thinking about how we're meeting that customer need in those extended drought periods, 1250 01:49:34,500 --> 01:49:49,080 It's going to become more difficult to meet that need and more expensive, so we can't necessarily rely on state water project water as a bucket of water to pull from in that extended drought. 1251 01:49:49,860 --> 01:49:55,020 So we need to start thinking about how else can we manage and address that. 1252 01:49:55,020 --> 01:50:00,000 And that's not even to consider the other stresses to other portions of our supply, 1253 01:50:00,280 --> 01:50:06,200 like potential stresses on coutumo or groundwater or just reductions in precipitation 1254 01:50:06,200 --> 01:50:07,980 or increased variability in precipitation. 1255 01:50:12,510 --> 01:50:16,290 So we have a couple of different mechanisms to address this, right? 1256 01:50:16,870 --> 01:50:22,270 So we can, of course, think about supply management, which maybe we would call things like groundwater 1257 01:50:22,270 --> 01:50:28,390 baking and making sure we're really smart about what supply we're taking when so that, you 1258 01:50:28,390 --> 01:50:34,350 out of time that allows us to maybe then bank or store or surplus water when it occurred. 1259 01:50:34,950 --> 01:50:38,430 However, there are definitely costs associated with that, ground water banking could be 1260 01:50:38,430 --> 01:50:43,850 very expensive. Also, just do graphically at this point. We don't even know that there are 1261 01:50:43,850 --> 01:50:49,130 options that could work for us. So supply management, you know, it's definitely something to 1262 01:50:49,130 --> 01:50:53,090 consider and to look into and to build in our portfolio, but what an necessarily address 1263 01:50:53,090 --> 01:50:55,990 that red shaded portion of the bar in full. 1264 01:50:56,770 --> 01:51:00,350 Another option is supply augmentation, so we could talk about something like cap. 1265 01:51:01,030 --> 01:51:05,350 Also would be expensive, but retaining local control there could be really beneficial. 1266 01:51:06,610 --> 01:51:07,970 So that's one avenue to consider. 1267 01:51:08,190 --> 01:51:14,530 The third would be demand management, which makes a lot of sense that we continue to pursue. 1268 01:51:14,570 --> 01:51:22,230 However, it's very unlikely to provide a reduction in demand of that full red-chorded shaded portion 1269 01:51:22,230 --> 01:51:30,190 of that bar. So we're still left with this question if we need to identify how we want to bolster 1270 01:51:30,190 --> 01:51:35,910 reliability for that portion of demand and then of course what it's going to cost and how 1271 01:51:35,910 --> 01:51:44,450 we want to go about recovering those costs. So one thing to think about is that there's sort of 1272 01:51:44,450 --> 01:51:51,770 two different challenges that we're trying to address here how to bolster reliability for those 1273 01:51:51,770 --> 01:51:55,470 existing customers and then also for that blue bar portion. 1274 01:51:55,810 --> 01:51:58,570 So additional demand outside of what we see currently. 1275 01:51:59,690 --> 01:52:04,890 And so one thing that we could do is no matter which of those options from the previous 1276 01:52:04,890 --> 01:52:11,190 slide we go with, we need to recover those costs somehow so we can make sure that we 1277 01:52:11,190 --> 01:52:20,130 tie new demand that increased blue bar portion of demand to whatever mechanism we choose and make 1278 01:52:20,130 --> 01:52:25,030 that they are paying their fair share when they're adding stress to a stress-to-system. 1279 01:52:25,770 --> 01:52:29,230 So the way we could do that is through what we're calling an impact fee. 1280 01:52:29,910 --> 01:52:34,690 So we could come with a up with a few amount and tie it to a particular project and then say, 1281 01:52:34,770 --> 01:52:41,190 okay, this is the amount that you would pay if you are adding new demand to the system. 1282 01:52:42,590 --> 01:52:48,570 And just to sort of tie things together a little bit, so we've previously discussed intensification 1283 01:52:48,570 --> 01:52:54,250 and allocations. So this is a third term to think about. So the way I would tie them together 1284 01:52:54,250 --> 01:53:01,170 is that allocations are a baseline. Intensification is increased demand above that baseline. 1285 01:53:01,250 --> 01:53:05,210 And again, we're focusing on, like, significant land exchanges and significant 1286 01:53:05,210 --> 01:53:11,490 exchanges and demand there. And then the impact fee could be the dollar amount that we're 1287 01:53:11,490 --> 01:53:15,950 tying to that intensification. So the dollar amount associated with the acre of feet. 1288 01:53:16,950 --> 01:53:33,170 And so we'll, as we continue through this process, we'll get into more of the details of what that number that dollar number would look like and what the nexus would be in terms of the benefit that's being provided in the actual project that that's tied to. 1289 01:53:33,170 --> 01:53:54,610 So if you continue to the next slide, so how we could actually collect that impact fee would be through our intent to serve process, so whenever there is a development or redevelopment project, it has to come to the district and ask for an intent to serve letter, so essentially a letter saying that we have sufficient water supply to serve that project. 1290 01:53:55,730 --> 01:54:09,390 We review those as we talked about when we're viewing the intensification methodology, there are many projects which would not trigger the intensification review and therefore not even be part of this water supply impact fee discussion. 1291 01:54:10,010 --> 01:54:15,770 However, the projects that do trigger review and it could be subject to this impact fee. 1292 01:54:16,210 --> 01:54:20,670 What we could do is we could issue them their intent to serve letter with conditions. 1293 01:54:20,670 --> 01:54:29,890 So we already have letters with conditions so this could be one line a condition in that letter saying essentially that at the end of the project 1294 01:54:29,890 --> 01:54:32,890 We would be requiring them to pay the impact fee 1295 01:54:33,190 --> 01:54:36,210 So then they'd go and do their project on the end of the project 1296 01:54:36,770 --> 01:54:42,410 We would tie collection of that impact fee to some mechanism like potentially installation of meters 1297 01:54:43,650 --> 01:54:49,930 Which is to be figured out but there would be some collection mechanism at the end of the project where we collect the impact fee 1298 01:54:52,840 --> 01:55:00,360 So, this is something that we definitely want to talk to people about and get their input on. 1299 01:55:00,980 --> 01:55:10,060 Same thing as the other public outreach methods that we've talked about, we'll use a variety of online and print messaging system. 1300 01:55:10,280 --> 01:55:17,480 So, we're trying to make aware as many customers as possible and we will again ask them to come to board meetings and provide input. 1301 01:55:17,480 --> 01:55:23,020 we're also thinking of opening up a public comment form online so that people could 1302 01:55:23,020 --> 01:55:27,220 make comments online and that we could review them and decide whether there's things that 1303 01:55:27,220 --> 01:55:32,840 we should build into our methodology there. So if you go to the next slide, I think it's time 1304 01:55:32,840 --> 01:55:40,360 line. Yeah, so we'll have a couple of meetings where we talk more of the details about the 1305 01:55:40,360 --> 01:55:46,960 the fee itself and what the amount would be and how it would be determined will then have 1306 01:55:46,960 --> 01:55:51,060 a public comment period where people can submit information. 1307 01:55:51,320 --> 01:55:56,000 We would then review those comments, potentially integrate them, and then show you the 1308 01:55:56,000 --> 01:55:56,440 documents. 1309 01:55:56,780 --> 01:56:04,260 As I mentioned at the previous meeting, they'll be likely an ordinance and then also a document 1310 01:56:04,260 --> 01:56:13,200 that had information about the basis of the fee and the access and just a little bit more context 1311 01:56:13,200 --> 01:56:20,040 than is in ordinance and then asking for adoption in May. However, I want to caveat this timeline 1312 01:56:20,040 --> 01:56:25,320 with the fact that we've just talked about several other ongoing projects and needs for outreach. 1313 01:56:25,600 --> 01:56:29,840 So this is of course subject to change if when we put these all together, we then decide 1314 01:56:29,840 --> 01:56:33,920 that things need to move around a little bit so that people can actually understand the message 1315 01:56:33,920 --> 01:56:38,520 that is we're trying to convey to them. I think that's all I have on the 1316 01:56:38,520 --> 01:56:39,620 impact to you at this point. 1317 01:56:42,110 --> 01:56:46,790 Any questions? I would I would definitely do the 1318 01:56:47,530 --> 01:56:51,130 the the comment through the district website. I would definitely add that 1319 01:56:51,130 --> 01:56:54,630 make try to make that user friendly because we just get so little feedback as it is. 1320 01:56:56,250 --> 01:57:00,630 Yeah. Thank you. I like to make one comment because I'm on both sides of this 1321 01:57:00,630 --> 01:57:03,990 equation, but let's still here, right? 1322 01:57:05,210 --> 01:57:12,470 So during the drought, it became very apparent that the egg mainly avocados 1323 01:57:13,490 --> 01:57:17,190 pulled an extra 2008 feet of water, because there was no rain. 1324 01:57:19,330 --> 01:57:24,450 So our residences, all of us cut back, but as farmers, use more. 1325 01:57:24,450 --> 01:57:29,630 So should we have an impact fee for during the drought for us farmers? 1326 01:57:31,310 --> 01:57:31,810 I'm just, 1327 01:57:34,040 --> 01:57:43,580 you know, I'm just saying, but shock me was that during the drought, we got to take care of our orchards. 1328 01:57:44,740 --> 01:57:46,060 But I mean, it takes water. 1329 01:57:46,980 --> 01:57:51,320 And I got the feeling once we started getting these meters on these wells. 1330 01:57:51,540 --> 01:57:53,520 I think we're going to be, well, not surprised. 1331 01:57:53,520 --> 01:57:55,480 But I think we're going to have a pretty accurate picture 1332 01:57:55,480 --> 01:57:57,160 who is using what. 1333 01:57:57,520 --> 01:57:58,520 So it is. 1334 01:57:59,280 --> 01:57:59,380 Yeah. 1335 01:58:01,360 --> 01:58:04,660 And when we did the allocations we looked at, 1336 01:58:04,660 --> 01:58:06,460 we had a thing called, 1337 01:58:07,160 --> 01:58:11,020 what was the well estimate the demand offset 1338 01:58:11,020 --> 01:58:14,580 or the demand ever go with? 1339 01:58:14,920 --> 01:58:16,780 We've very between several terms I don't remember. 1340 01:58:16,780 --> 01:58:17,880 I don't remember what the term was. 1341 01:58:18,060 --> 01:58:20,780 But we looked at agricultural use of groundwater. 1342 01:58:20,780 --> 01:58:29,080 not as a we need to charge for this it was really so that we could understand the overall 1343 01:58:29,080 --> 01:58:31,240 water demand and the valley. 1344 01:58:33,560 --> 01:58:37,460 The GSA fee is really designed to recover cost for the management 1345 01:58:37,460 --> 01:58:43,440 of the groundwater basin so that's in a way the GSA fee is a similar fee to this impact fee 1346 01:58:44,380 --> 01:58:49,560 but targeted towards the groundwater users so that they are paying for the management of the 1347 01:58:49,560 --> 01:59:07,160 And part of that will be, you know, meters and sort of working with the users of the basin to try to make sure that the, you know, when we, when the basins in trouble, we don't continue to pump like we have maybe in the past. 1348 01:59:10,440 --> 01:59:15,180 The impact fee is targeted towards new development or changes in land use, right? 1349 01:59:15,180 --> 01:59:18,760 So the impact fee is really focused on. 1350 01:59:19,140 --> 01:59:21,980 We allocated the water, we have across all 1351 01:59:21,980 --> 01:59:24,360 of the parcels of the district. 1352 01:59:26,060 --> 01:59:28,980 So we have that as a starting point. 1353 01:59:29,560 --> 01:59:32,260 Now, someone who comes along and says, well, I want to put 1354 01:59:32,860 --> 01:59:36,020 where this parcel used to be one commercial building, 1355 01:59:36,200 --> 01:59:38,780 I'm going to put 50 units on it. 1356 01:59:39,300 --> 01:59:43,940 That's a definite intensification of water use on that parcel. 1357 01:59:43,940 --> 01:59:53,740 And so what we're trying to do with the impact fee is, say, well, you know, this is adding on top of what we've already allocated our water. 1358 01:59:54,400 --> 01:59:58,740 This is adding on enforcing us to go and look for new water. 1359 02:00:00,000 --> 02:00:10,460 The cost of that is then borne by that person or developer that's actually doing the development in intense fire. 1360 02:00:10,860 --> 02:00:22,820 I support the intensification fee, the part that shocked me was during the drought, the homeowner's cut back, and his farmers use more. 1361 02:00:22,820 --> 02:00:28,900 And, you know, it's not all bad that the fact that we got the room for 40,000 acre feet of water in our groundwater basin. 1362 02:00:29,800 --> 02:00:31,480 Hey, that's by water cheap and fill it back up. 1363 02:00:31,920 --> 02:00:37,780 Yeah, and I mean, you know, trying not to look rearwards too much. 1364 02:00:38,540 --> 02:00:42,840 What we're under Sigma, we're looking forward and saying, how are we going to manage this in the future? 1365 02:00:42,940 --> 02:00:50,100 Because we know during droughts, not only does a farmer have to make up for the water that they're not getting from rain, 1366 02:00:51,080 --> 02:00:57,780 There are, you know, there are pumping all of that water and not only that, but there's no rain retarging the water. 1367 02:00:59,300 --> 02:01:01,620 Can I just, I understand a little bit. 1368 02:01:02,560 --> 02:01:08,580 So like with that intensification fee, we put like a pool and hey, we're the 100 acre feet short this year. 1369 02:01:08,600 --> 02:01:11,840 We're going to go buy settlement or what would like the actual like execution of that. 1370 02:01:11,840 --> 02:01:15,320 Yeah, I mean, it definitely will require, so during the cost of service, 1371 02:01:15,320 --> 02:01:21,500 you want to make some decisions on how we'll manage those funds. Could be that it's a fund that 1372 02:01:21,500 --> 02:01:26,960 pre-pays debt on the cap project. If the cap project is moving forward, if not the cap project, 1373 02:01:27,360 --> 02:01:32,860 then it could be a fund that's a sinking fund for supplemental water supply or something like that. 1374 02:01:34,600 --> 02:01:39,380 And then just so I'm real clear, that top little blue line was that just like 200-acre feeders, 1375 02:01:39,560 --> 02:01:45,200 that shunner is that like the red line's overlaying that whole bump on the chart with the blue and the red 1376 02:01:45,200 --> 02:01:50,160 ash. Is that just into the red. So all the red and then the blue on top of it. Okay. 1377 02:01:50,480 --> 02:01:55,500 Yes. Yeah. And then this demand is actually underneath this red, this redness, the area. 1378 02:01:55,920 --> 02:02:02,200 So when we go into a stage two or three, this is what we're doing is we're trying to manage this 1379 02:02:02,200 --> 02:02:06,320 on supply and water. 1380 02:02:06,580 --> 02:02:08,120 All right, but now you brought it back. 1381 02:02:08,560 --> 02:02:12,380 What surprised me is, there's about, well, 1382 02:02:13,500 --> 02:02:17,920 maybe 800 acre feet more water used during drought, 1383 02:02:18,120 --> 02:02:19,860 but me know that possibly, 1384 02:02:23,200 --> 02:02:24,500 avocado's some nursery, 1385 02:02:24,980 --> 02:02:26,700 carbon nursery doesn't change much, 1386 02:02:26,800 --> 02:02:29,680 but they could use 2,000 acre feet, so that, 1387 02:02:29,680 --> 02:02:33,760 It doesn't include groundwater pumped out of the base and through private wells. 1388 02:02:33,860 --> 02:02:37,180 This is only the water districts, water supply. 1389 02:02:38,880 --> 02:02:40,240 Well, that's why you pay your fair share. 1390 02:02:40,760 --> 02:02:40,920 What? 1391 02:02:41,000 --> 02:02:42,440 We did have a drought surcharge also. 1392 02:02:43,800 --> 02:02:43,900 Okay. 1393 02:02:44,140 --> 02:02:44,780 We did have a drought. 1394 02:02:44,780 --> 02:02:45,160 All shut up. 1395 02:02:45,160 --> 02:02:46,340 As the stage is going. 1396 02:02:46,880 --> 02:02:47,140 Right. 1397 02:02:47,600 --> 02:02:53,500 But that's, you know, the point was the GSA is being managed and actually, I disagree with 1398 02:02:53,500 --> 02:03:01,680 Bill Karthlin, I think right now what we're doing with the meters on the wells is the only fairway 1399 02:03:01,680 --> 02:03:07,060 to assess that, so we'll need to come back and have the discussion. 1400 02:03:07,320 --> 02:03:08,720 You should be there too. 1401 02:03:10,930 --> 02:03:11,530 Do I? 1402 02:03:12,030 --> 02:03:12,450 Go for it. 1403 02:03:12,650 --> 02:03:13,070 Go for it. 1404 02:03:13,210 --> 02:03:13,250 Yeah. 1405 02:03:13,570 --> 02:03:14,370 It's very good. 1406 02:03:14,930 --> 02:03:17,390 Quickly, and I don't. 1407 02:03:17,510 --> 02:03:18,330 It's got the undercar. 1408 02:03:18,430 --> 02:03:23,050 I don't pretend to have the answers, but I would like to make two observations. 1409 02:03:23,050 --> 02:03:29,070 one is with regard to the CAP project, it can be looked at sort of as an insurance policy. 1410 02:03:29,750 --> 02:03:34,590 And some people are going to benefit more from that insurance policy than others, but that's 1411 02:03:34,590 --> 02:03:40,130 what we're looking at is something for the future that will assure a better water supply. 1412 02:03:40,710 --> 02:03:50,890 I would also make a similar comparison with your example case of the orchards and a drought. 1413 02:03:50,890 --> 02:04:00,310 There is precedent for a customer-based residential base of actually deciding to support 1414 02:04:00,310 --> 02:04:08,070 agriculture because they see the benefit of the open space and the green space and that sort of thing. 1415 02:04:08,290 --> 02:04:15,210 And I would add to that with the idea of insurance that those orchards, especially during a drought, 1416 02:04:15,210 --> 02:04:21,510 stop wildfire fires or slow them way down and people are beginning to recognize that more 1417 02:04:21,510 --> 02:04:30,470 and more. So that benefit may be seen by the community as a cost they're willing to help 1418 02:04:30,470 --> 02:04:35,150 subsidize to keep those orchards there. Just one more thing. 1419 02:04:35,170 --> 02:04:36,890 No, that's why we asked you to step up. 1420 02:04:37,390 --> 02:04:43,130 Well, but also, and this is my personal opinion. I've only lived here for about five years. 1421 02:04:43,130 --> 02:04:49,210 So I've seen a few things happen in a couple of wildfires, but the bottom line is, I don't 1422 02:04:49,210 --> 02:04:55,850 think 50 years from now, we're going to have Katuma or State Water, but we will have Cap, 1423 02:04:56,110 --> 02:05:01,010 we will have Injection, if you can buy one of cheaper, if you can, and we need to also work 1424 02:05:01,010 --> 02:05:02,350 on the recharge in the valley. 1425 02:05:03,230 --> 02:05:10,350 So I mean, then that would keep our cost of water lower than anybody else in the first 1426 02:05:10,350 --> 02:05:11,110 will be. 1427 02:05:11,610 --> 02:05:12,110 Anybody else? 1428 02:05:12,110 --> 02:05:17,290 Just the last comment I'd encourage you to maybe talk to community development department if you haven't 1429 02:05:17,290 --> 02:05:23,290 about reach in their understanding of, you know, the response to development impact fees. 1430 02:05:23,510 --> 02:05:29,130 I mean, there's, that is a very standard thing and, you know, covers other costs, 1431 02:05:29,490 --> 02:05:35,410 then what we're talking about, but, you know, learned from the pain that the city goes through. 1432 02:05:36,990 --> 02:05:37,730 Thank you, Mesa. 1433 02:05:40,910 --> 02:05:45,230 Okay, I had a speakers slip for this item. 1434 02:05:45,670 --> 02:05:46,390 Go for a charity. 1435 02:05:46,930 --> 02:05:47,690 My time now. 1436 02:05:47,950 --> 02:05:48,270 Oh, thank you. 1437 02:05:48,310 --> 02:05:49,230 Now is your time. 1438 02:05:49,230 --> 02:05:50,310 I'll shut up. 1439 02:05:50,750 --> 02:05:53,070 Some of my questions were answered. 1440 02:05:54,670 --> 02:05:56,390 And it's what we hear a lot. 1441 02:05:56,630 --> 02:06:07,710 When we go out in the public and they're discussing new developments that increase the pressure on water and how can we pay for this? 1442 02:06:07,710 --> 02:06:31,450 and what are we going to do. So, you know, so a lot of my questions were already addressed here and I have, there's two points that we need to look at is, you know, how, if you want to do an impact 1443 02:06:31,450 --> 02:06:54,510 which we have to do and I think everybody agrees for new projects, increased pressure on the water and it says here it will be configured according to the water reliability project which provides the water. 1444 02:06:55,130 --> 02:07:04,330 Now, you know, so what, I guess the water reliability project that we're looking at now, which is very expensive is a cap project. 1445 02:07:04,990 --> 02:07:14,230 You know, so if you have a big apartment complex, it's going to put, you know, I don't know, a thousand acre feed a year extra pressure than what was there before 1446 02:07:14,230 --> 02:07:24,430 are is there impact be going to be $4,500 times a thousand, which is what the CAP project 1447 02:07:24,430 --> 02:07:31,290 costs us, or it's going to be hard to figure it when you don't know, you might have to go 1448 02:07:31,290 --> 02:07:41,910 on the open market and buy water from Santa Maria or something, so that was one question I 1449 02:07:41,910 --> 02:07:47,190 and thank you for all your work and we have to work this out and figure it out and but also 1450 02:07:47,930 --> 02:07:54,090 don't really I don't see how I agree with case basically I don't know how you can really rely 1451 02:07:54,090 --> 02:08:04,410 on the cap project for a long-term drought any kind of security insurance policy because you are 1452 02:08:04,410 --> 02:08:10,630 putting and taking you are putting a thousand acre feet in you're taking it out and it's you know 1453 02:08:10,630 --> 02:08:15,470 It's very expensive so you have to do that and then it'll take away from the cost of your 1454 02:08:15,470 --> 02:08:21,410 coutumo water wherever else you get it, which, you know, Bob is really a master and very 1455 02:08:21,410 --> 02:08:23,090 experienced in juggling this. 1456 02:08:26,050 --> 02:08:30,410 But, you know, it's going to help with our reliability but not long 1457 02:08:30,410 --> 02:08:35,250 term as far as as far as I can see. So I guess, 1458 02:08:37,360 --> 02:08:39,240 oh yeah, and the other question you already answered, 1459 02:08:39,240 --> 02:08:44,040 that I was going to ask is after we collect these impact fees, what we're going to do with the money. 1460 02:08:44,800 --> 02:08:53,680 And that's going to be a counter for you answer that question and it'll maybe be used to pay down the debt of the cap, 1461 02:08:54,700 --> 02:09:03,660 which then that would make the cap even if the cap is started before new people come, they can so pay down that debt. 1462 02:09:03,820 --> 02:09:06,400 So that sounds like a good idea. 1463 02:09:06,400 --> 02:09:07,180 So, 1464 02:09:09,260 --> 02:09:23,940 I guess, yeah, I guess, do you have any comments about how we can, how can we put a charge on water reliability projects as they come, come down the road? 1465 02:09:24,000 --> 02:09:25,560 I guess that's my question. 1466 02:09:26,870 --> 02:09:35,990 through the chair. So just at first I'll start with just kind of clarifying that we're only 1467 02:09:35,990 --> 02:09:40,570 talking about the capital portion of the cap projects. So in other words, 1468 02:09:42,670 --> 02:09:43,590 I think the net 1469 02:09:43,590 --> 02:09:50,150 $42 million of capital costs that will go into the cap is the, 1470 02:09:54,090 --> 02:09:55,510 you know, if we were going to use 1471 02:09:55,510 --> 02:10:05,650 You know, the 42 million divided by a thousand acre feet come up with, you know, 4,200 or 42,000 per acre foot. 1472 02:10:05,970 --> 02:10:14,530 And so the real numbers that we're seeing of some of the larger projects are on the order of, you know, 20 to 30 acre feet. 1473 02:10:15,010 --> 02:10:24,630 So nothing like a thousand acre feet would, you know, if we did have just, you know, a gigantic development that increased by a thousand acre feet. 1474 02:10:24,630 --> 02:10:31,870 You're right, what we would end up doing is just dividing or we just basically pay the whole project on that development. 1475 02:10:33,670 --> 02:10:38,390 Although there might be some issues with that from a cost nexus standpoint. 1476 02:10:38,770 --> 02:10:42,570 So those are things that we need to work out and understand. 1477 02:10:43,310 --> 02:10:50,630 One of the complications of this is that if a development occurs, they pay an impact, 1478 02:10:50,630 --> 02:10:58,250 where I'm sorry, intensification fee, and then the people that move into that development 1479 02:10:58,250 --> 02:11:05,210 start paying the water builder on the tax roll, the charges that we have in debt repayment, 1480 02:11:06,070 --> 02:11:11,550 we can kind of wrap around the axle a little bit in terms of double paying. So we need 1481 02:11:11,550 --> 02:11:15,730 to understand clearly kind of how to work that and make sure that we're not collecting 1482 02:11:15,730 --> 02:11:16,350 twice. 1483 02:11:19,050 --> 02:11:26,150 And so it's not as straightforward as it is because they only pay it once. And 1484 02:11:26,150 --> 02:11:31,550 it's going to be, you know, felt, you know, forever. 1485 02:11:31,770 --> 02:11:36,570 Exactly. We only pay for the construction of the cap once. And so that's kind of the idea 1486 02:11:36,570 --> 02:11:43,610 by that. But what we are going to pay for is the debt related, you know, all customers are going 1487 02:11:43,610 --> 02:11:50,350 pay for is the debt related to cap and so that is tied to the capital cost so that that's 1488 02:11:50,350 --> 02:11:54,830 where I'm saying it's a little bit tricky we have to look at kind of if there's a changing 1489 02:11:54,830 --> 02:12:06,110 rate as you go through time perhaps that may be one mechanism so in terms of whether the cap 1490 02:12:06,110 --> 02:12:10,090 will change the outlook of reliability. 1491 02:12:11,230 --> 02:12:15,430 We are doing modeling with Westwater to look at what 1492 02:12:15,650 --> 02:12:22,210 the impact of cap is over time through the model 50-year period. 1493 02:12:24,270 --> 02:12:28,010 And the mechanism that is, for the preliminary modeling 1494 02:12:28,010 --> 02:12:32,530 that we've seen, the mechanism is that as you're 1495 02:12:32,530 --> 02:12:39,550 using cap more regularly what happens is other supplies start to build up, including, you 1496 02:12:39,550 --> 02:12:43,710 know, groundwater and storage, including some of the consumer water supplies, state water 1497 02:12:43,710 --> 02:12:52,890 supplies, which you can bank. And so there is a trickle effect or butterfly effect of using 1498 02:12:52,890 --> 02:12:57,110 cap consistently to all the other water supplies. So that's really- 1499 02:12:57,110 --> 02:13:02,410 I think so rather than use up your other water supplies, you don't actually have to be pumping 1500 02:13:02,410 --> 02:13:07,710 into the ground, you would just not use it and leave it in consumer or leave it in San Luis. 1501 02:13:08,210 --> 02:13:16,330 Exactly. But the only problem with that is, you know, how leave it in consumer no, the feds don't 1502 02:13:16,330 --> 02:13:22,570 want you to leave it in consumer. If you leave it for too long, they take it away. You donate it to the feds. 1503 02:13:24,010 --> 02:13:30,070 So, you know, that's why it's so important to think physicality, you know, you know, 1504 02:13:30,070 --> 02:13:36,210 or actually store physical water molecules, but I know you're on board with that, you're thinking 1505 02:13:36,210 --> 02:13:37,870 in the right direction. 1506 02:13:37,970 --> 02:13:41,270 And my other concern of course will be the cost of service model. 1507 02:13:42,590 --> 02:13:48,850 Fixed charges, you know, are fixed charges, and they can, you know, they can benefit. 1508 02:13:50,070 --> 02:13:55,010 They've been known to benefit the large water users more than the smaller ones. 1509 02:13:55,750 --> 02:13:59,090 It could, you know, it can change the, and it's really hard to tell. 1510 02:13:59,090 --> 02:14:05,030 you can't tell it by looking at what Maso really presented. Although I know she's going to look into it 1511 02:14:05,030 --> 02:14:13,510 further, as far as the classes of water that look at a typical water bill and this one 1512 02:14:13,510 --> 02:14:29,070 will increase by this percentage and that will increase by that percentage. It doesn't really 1513 02:14:29,070 --> 02:14:34,190 on this, so we won't get stuck with a lot of development with no water available. 1514 02:14:37,630 --> 02:14:38,810 Yep, good to hear for me. 1515 02:14:39,250 --> 02:14:39,630 Thank you. 1516 02:14:39,830 --> 02:14:40,310 Thank you very much. 1517 02:14:40,510 --> 02:14:40,990 Thanks, Charlie. 1518 02:14:41,930 --> 02:14:42,490 Thanks you. 1519 02:14:49,440 --> 02:14:55,580 Okay, then we go to item number 70, consider it a solution number 1165 updating the district 1520 02:14:55,580 --> 02:14:57,860 conflict of interest for action. 1521 02:15:00,000 --> 02:15:06,860 Similar to what we went over on the GSA, we're updating the conflict or the conflict of interest code. 1522 02:15:07,140 --> 02:15:10,040 I'm moving to the top resolution, 1, 1, 6, 5. I'll second. 1523 02:15:11,080 --> 02:15:13,160 We've got a motion to second. Any more discussion? 1524 02:15:13,720 --> 02:15:14,680 Roll call, please. 1525 02:15:15,640 --> 02:15:16,320 Dr. O'Connor. 1526 02:15:17,200 --> 02:15:17,780 Dr. Holcomb. 1527 02:15:18,500 --> 02:15:19,100 Dr. Bolt. 1528 02:15:19,860 --> 02:15:20,460 Dr. Robert. 1529 02:15:21,160 --> 02:15:21,860 Dr. Van Wiernan. 1530 02:15:22,700 --> 02:15:23,320 Motion passing. 1531 02:15:23,920 --> 02:15:29,280 Item number 7, e. Consider securing a D&O insurance cover as for district directors. 1532 02:15:29,280 --> 02:15:32,260 in officers for action bomb? 1533 02:15:33,620 --> 02:15:40,880 Yes, so Director O'Connor brought this up a number of weeks ago about securing some 1534 02:15:40,880 --> 02:15:51,600 D&O insurance, which is Director's officers insurance for boards and executive staff or officers on the board. 1535 02:15:53,820 --> 02:16:04,000 And we've got, we've kind of gone almost in a complete circle on trying to understand whether we're covered or whether we need coverage or where there are gaps. 1536 02:16:04,000 --> 02:16:27,500 And the JPI does, so let me back up, the directors and officers ensure it's covers the directors and their assets if they're sued for decisions and personal assets are included in that lawsuit. 1537 02:16:27,500 --> 02:16:35,740 So, all of that is covered in normal D&O insurance, that's the purpose of it is to try 1538 02:16:35,740 --> 02:16:45,760 to protect drug members and allow for people, talented people to come and join the board 1539 02:16:45,760 --> 02:16:50,460 without the fear of their personal assets being attacked for their decisions. 1540 02:16:52,240 --> 02:16:57,040 We checked with the Joint Powers Insurance Agency, and they have a thing called E&O, 1541 02:16:57,040 --> 02:17:04,520 errors in a mission, which is typically, it's an insurance that is typically used by 1542 02:17:04,520 --> 02:17:14,040 professional consultants, primarily architects, engineers, and they're like to protect 1543 02:17:14,040 --> 02:17:19,460 them from an error or mission on the plans that results into a construction claim. 1544 02:17:21,780 --> 02:17:31,860 And they buy that to protect their firms from, you know, if a suit is brought against them for some sort of construction defector design defect. 1545 02:17:33,880 --> 02:17:42,320 But for some reason, at the RJPIA, they call it Board of Directors Eres and omissions. 1546 02:17:42,320 --> 02:17:46,660 So it's sort of a conflation of DNO and ENO. 1547 02:17:47,400 --> 02:17:49,760 However, the description of coverage 1548 02:17:49,760 --> 02:17:54,080 says covers, directors, and officers 1549 02:17:56,020 --> 02:18:00,240 from lawsuits resulting from their official duties. 1550 02:18:01,140 --> 02:18:02,460 And then it makes an exception. 1551 02:18:04,100 --> 02:18:10,220 It doesn't cover fiduciary duties, which in this context 1552 02:18:10,220 --> 02:18:36,980 refers to managing of pensions and managing of a risk-a-type retirement funds, and so if there's a claim that the, for example, our 457B fund is mismanaged, this, what, what GPIA calls ENO does not cover, does not cover it. 1553 02:18:36,980 --> 02:18:44,580 So there's a special insurance coverage called Fidishary coverage, which we're planning on 1554 02:18:44,580 --> 02:18:54,520 investigating this further with our management consultant that manages our Arisa Fund to 1555 02:18:54,520 --> 02:18:58,780 find out okay, you know, who's at risk. 1556 02:18:59,040 --> 02:19:05,960 I understand that I think I am the one who is listed as the Fidishary for that fund, for 1557 02:19:05,960 --> 02:19:07,760 that investment. 1558 02:19:09,160 --> 02:19:13,380 And so I don't know that the board has exposure, but that's one of the things on my 1559 02:19:13,380 --> 02:19:15,060 list that I need to check out. 1560 02:19:16,460 --> 02:19:23,360 But in terms of our current understanding, the ENO insurance that JPI offers as part 1561 02:19:23,360 --> 02:19:34,720 of our pooled insurance does cover board activities and decisions up to, was it, 55 million. 1562 02:19:34,720 --> 02:19:38,700 So it's a large coverage, typically you see them at 10 million. 1563 02:19:38,960 --> 02:19:39,920 It's the limits of coverage. 1564 02:19:40,300 --> 02:19:43,780 I think 10, 20, or 10, single, 20 aggregate. 1565 02:19:46,280 --> 02:19:52,440 But I think we need a little bit of time to clarify this further because, as I said, 1566 02:19:52,700 --> 02:19:56,980 we sort of thought we knew where we were going when we were putting the board back together. 1567 02:19:57,640 --> 02:20:03,680 But recent communications with JPI has made us believe that there's some misunderstanding 1568 02:20:03,680 --> 02:20:08,000 any at the GPA as to what insurance and what coverage they're actually offering. 1569 02:20:09,420 --> 02:20:16,180 So our next step and this is for action basically looking for you to direct us to go and 1570 02:20:16,180 --> 02:20:18,400 get some quotes for D&O insurance. 1571 02:20:20,160 --> 02:20:25,400 But I think I'm going to pull that back and come back at a future meeting after we get some 1572 02:20:25,400 --> 02:20:30,180 of these questions that we have on a staff little answered to our GPA. 1573 02:20:30,180 --> 02:20:30,360 Okay. 1574 02:20:32,780 --> 02:20:33,460 More is better. 1575 02:20:35,020 --> 02:20:41,060 I'd also be interested in, I was under maybe I'm mistaken, but there might be some statutory 1576 02:20:41,540 --> 02:20:46,740 protections from liability under the government code, and maybe I'm remembering something 1577 02:20:46,740 --> 02:20:47,360 else entirely. 1578 02:20:48,120 --> 02:20:52,480 I'm sure that they would be aware of that, and if there was a DN, you know, a director's 1579 02:20:52,480 --> 02:20:55,720 an officer's insurance, it would tie into that. 1580 02:20:55,980 --> 02:20:58,080 But it'd be interesting to know if that is in fact true. 1581 02:20:58,420 --> 02:21:01,600 It's kind of like the Goods American law, you know, where you shouldn't be sued if you 1582 02:21:01,600 --> 02:21:05,480 try to do an emergency response to a first aid or something? 1583 02:21:06,260 --> 02:21:12,160 Yeah, we did check with other agencies to see if any of them had DNO and only because 1584 02:21:12,160 --> 02:21:23,620 so Glyda did not and Montecito did not and Casitas has ENO, which again is not DNO, so we're not sure 1585 02:21:23,620 --> 02:21:31,600 you know, if it's, there might be a statutory protection. So we'll stay tuned. 1586 02:21:32,040 --> 02:21:36,700 I just thought we were covered by JPA, so that you answer my question anyway. Thank you. 1587 02:21:37,560 --> 02:21:41,700 I didn't catch it, so we currently have ENO, or we do not, they just offer it. 1588 02:21:42,040 --> 02:21:48,720 You know, we current through our JPA coverage, we are covered for ENO, with their calling ENO, which I, I'm fiduciary. 1589 02:21:49,080 --> 02:21:52,520 Right. I'm interpreting their ENO as DNO insurance. 1590 02:21:52,520 --> 02:22:01,100 drive Bob, but you're going to go ahead and review all three of the D&O, E&O and FMO, because, and again, 1591 02:22:02,020 --> 02:22:08,220 I don't want to make it too complicated, but don't hold against the lawyers here, but 1592 02:22:08,220 --> 02:22:12,260 they only suit people where there's resources, and they're not going to suit anybody where there's no money. 1593 02:22:13,200 --> 02:22:18,760 So that's be mindful of, thank you, Patrick. I want to retry our peacefully, sir. 1594 02:22:18,760 --> 02:22:26,940 Yeah, I will come back with a report on all three coverages and, you know, describe what I found with the 1595 02:22:26,940 --> 02:22:29,440 JPI and, and our RISM manager. 1596 02:22:30,180 --> 02:22:35,140 Yeah, and just from public and private experience, company experience, this is not an unusual 1597 02:22:35,140 --> 02:22:35,620 thing. 1598 02:22:35,960 --> 02:22:37,140 We're not asking for it. 1599 02:22:37,160 --> 02:22:37,480 Right, Bob. 1600 02:22:37,580 --> 02:22:38,280 Something unusual. 1601 02:22:38,740 --> 02:22:46,080 And even your retirement, but even your health care, should be reviewed if we have 1602 02:22:46,080 --> 02:22:48,120 and the flaw in our healthcare coverage, 1603 02:22:48,600 --> 02:22:53,120 which could be major, any future surprises out there. 1604 02:22:53,500 --> 02:22:56,620 I think both should be reviewed, retirement, and healthcare. 1605 02:22:57,080 --> 02:22:57,680 Oh, these things. 1606 02:22:58,520 --> 02:23:00,540 Yeah, I can put that on list. 1607 02:23:01,000 --> 02:23:01,720 Thank you, everyone. 1608 02:23:01,920 --> 02:23:02,580 That's helpful. 1609 02:23:04,850 --> 02:23:07,070 Because otherwise you're not going to find any board members 1610 02:23:07,070 --> 02:23:08,630 who run for this board anymore first. 1611 02:23:08,910 --> 02:23:09,410 I'm serious. 1612 02:23:09,630 --> 02:23:11,030 I mean, it is. 1613 02:23:11,710 --> 02:23:12,330 So first question. 1614 02:23:14,690 --> 02:23:16,210 But you took the job anyhow. 1615 02:23:19,990 --> 02:23:21,550 Thank you. 1616 02:23:22,070 --> 02:23:22,710 Thank you, Bob. 1617 02:23:25,290 --> 02:23:34,210 7F, acknowledge ACWA, JPAI presence, special recognition award for information Bob. 1618 02:23:35,330 --> 02:23:36,790 Yes, speaking of insurance. 1619 02:23:38,250 --> 02:23:50,590 Each year at the end of the year, JPI reviews each member's loss ratio on the property 1620 02:23:50,590 --> 02:23:57,850 program, the workers' comp program and the general liability program, and so if it's lower 1621 02:23:57,850 --> 02:24:06,510 than 20% then they acknowledge you with a reward or not an award and we were lower than 1622 02:24:06,510 --> 02:24:14,550 20% on all three programs so we we got three certificates and so I just wanted to let you know that 1623 02:24:14,550 --> 02:24:20,250 well that's a compliment to your team do they come framed um you can frame them if you like 1624 02:24:22,820 --> 02:24:28,620 is it newsworthy well these to bring us a check but they don't do that anymore 1625 02:24:28,620 --> 02:24:33,820 I think anything below 20% of the newsworthy I think so 1626 02:24:33,820 --> 02:24:38,260 It's news already. It shows that we are keeping claims down and that translates into 1627 02:24:38,820 --> 02:24:41,960 low opinions. All right. Thank you. 1628 02:24:46,830 --> 02:24:48,770 Director reports number eight. 1629 02:24:51,010 --> 02:24:51,830 8 a.m. 1630 02:24:52,010 --> 02:24:54,930 Regular meeting December 16, 2024, Pauli. 1631 02:24:54,950 --> 02:24:57,650 Thank you. Yeah, similarly is it was to wet up upset. 1632 02:24:57,870 --> 02:24:59,830 We also perceived good news. 1633 02:25:00,530 --> 02:25:03,770 And even though some of the aquibills and the estimates have gone up, 1634 02:25:04,630 --> 02:25:10,250 other things have gone down including our claims too and so that is balanced out a little bit. 1635 02:25:11,290 --> 02:25:17,790 The board passed all of the draft budget total compensation with GASP74-75, everything 1636 02:25:17,790 --> 02:25:24,510 I've reported on from the admin committee. That was up for adoption. The Bartlett Pringle 1637 02:25:24,510 --> 02:25:30,310 audit went very well and as a matter of fact the very complementary and called the experience 1638 02:25:30,310 --> 02:25:33,910 and they find things financially stable and very routine. 1639 02:25:35,730 --> 02:25:42,630 We got a grant from Santa Barbara County for $79,000 for a photovoltaic and EV charging 1640 02:25:42,630 --> 02:25:52,590 systems and solar panels, batteries, and three EV charging podiums, and possibly a tax credit. 1641 02:25:52,750 --> 02:25:56,710 We know that's kind of a limbo right now, but we're going to be moving forward with it with 1642 02:25:56,710 --> 02:26:03,290 project cost after the grant of only $76,000 to install all of this. 1643 02:26:03,430 --> 02:26:10,510 There was an ROI cost benefit to done and it does look like we'll be saving about $43,000 1644 02:26:11,310 --> 02:26:16,810 over the next four to seven years so that made sense to go ahead and implement that and we're 1645 02:26:16,810 --> 02:26:24,370 also watching the, as I reported before, Aqua, or maybe the state of California laws to switch over 1646 02:26:24,370 --> 02:26:30,130 to EV vehicles at a 2027, I think it is, so this all plays into that. 1647 02:26:31,290 --> 02:26:38,070 We approved a Habitat Humanity Habitat Improvement Project for a fish that will be in 1648 02:26:38,070 --> 02:26:39,630 three phases over three years. 1649 02:26:39,710 --> 02:26:47,250 This is only the grant phase that we approved will be going after a grant with CDFW, but 1650 02:26:47,250 --> 02:26:55,910 that we did approve was a $50,000 payment to HDR for consulting assistance to come up with 1651 02:26:55,910 --> 02:26:57,890 a grant application. 1652 02:26:59,650 --> 02:27:04,110 This we're working with the Bureau of Reclamation to see if they're going to improve it. 1653 02:27:04,250 --> 02:27:09,250 The rational behind it is that, even though there is lots of water, lots of fish, there's 1654 02:27:09,250 --> 02:27:15,010 a lot of water in Hilton Creek and so the idea is to improve the fish habitat, improve 1655 02:27:15,010 --> 02:27:26,030 this passage with making those improvements to Milton Creek, so in the last I heard it was not approved by the Bureau of Reclamation yet, but they are studying it right now. 1656 02:27:28,330 --> 02:27:43,030 We had a shutfield tunnel inspection in December that had be called off after I think it was the first 500 feet because the communications failed, so we're regrouping on the communications and the good news is that the first part of that the 500 feet. 1657 02:27:43,030 --> 02:27:47,970 the tunnel look good but we are aware of some water damage through the rest of that so we have to 1658 02:27:47,970 --> 02:27:53,910 get back in there and fix the communications so that we can finish the finish that sheffield 1659 02:27:53,910 --> 02:27:59,410 title inspection the log boom that I reported on the brand new one was installed around the 1660 02:27:59,410 --> 02:28:04,830 intake tower it should hold up as I said before if we see any further damage then we have to 1661 02:28:04,830 --> 02:28:10,170 look at vandalism possibly fishermen trying to get in to fish around the intake tower because that's 1662 02:28:10,170 --> 02:28:18,590 a lot of fisher known to be. So we'll be putting cameras up if it comes to that. Also, Bob, 1663 02:28:18,890 --> 02:28:23,950 I'm not sure if you might know more on this, but normally the water status, there's some 1664 02:28:23,950 --> 02:28:29,050 water loss that's creeping up and Joel is in touch with the county to figure out where it might 1665 02:28:29,050 --> 02:28:34,570 be coming from, normally that's very stable. So it's unusual that they would actually say this is 1666 02:28:35,170 --> 02:28:39,390 newsworthy, and that's all we know at this time. I'll have my next board meetings on Monday. 1667 02:28:39,390 --> 02:28:40,870 That concludes my report. 1668 02:28:41,450 --> 02:28:41,870 Oh, you know what? 1669 02:28:42,010 --> 02:28:47,350 I should mention that even though we approved everything that I reported on last at the last meeting, 1670 02:28:47,890 --> 02:28:52,310 one of the things that we think we are going to follow up on is putting together a trust 1671 02:28:52,310 --> 02:29:00,950 for the GASP B7475 on paid on the unfunded liability. 1672 02:29:01,290 --> 02:29:05,990 We talked about that last time and the board agreed for the financial controller. 1673 02:29:05,990 --> 02:29:10,930 we're too looking to it on a very meticulous basis, not to be rushed to see if it makes 1674 02:29:10,930 --> 02:29:18,290 us first to start into a small part, to start paying into this. This will take a lot of time 1675 02:29:18,290 --> 02:29:23,150 to figure out the pros and cons and I'll be reporting back on that. Thank you. Thanks, Molly. 1676 02:29:25,930 --> 02:29:29,110 There we go. Item number nine. Get a minute to report. 1677 02:29:34,200 --> 02:29:35,540 All that and we're going to do the financials? 1678 02:29:35,540 --> 02:29:37,000 Yeah, okay. 1679 02:29:37,460 --> 02:29:41,800 Back at page 78, excuse me, you have the water cells budget to actual. 1680 02:29:42,080 --> 02:29:46,980 So through November, we are at 64 acre feet below budgeted projections. 1681 02:29:49,020 --> 02:29:54,020 And that's primarily related to M&I usage, which is at 67 acre feet below. 1682 02:29:54,220 --> 02:29:56,440 And yeah, I guess about three acre feet above. 1683 02:29:56,440 --> 02:29:59,960 Pack it page 79 and statement there. 1684 02:30:00,000 --> 02:30:21,180 Change in the position, our water cells through November, we're 42% through the year and they're at 42.5% so we're pretty right on target there, overall revenue, 43% and our operating expenditure total, which is on packet page 82 or at about 40% so 2% just below a digital projections through November. 1685 02:30:28,760 --> 02:30:30,440 My presentation, if you have any questions? 1686 02:30:31,600 --> 02:30:37,400 Thank you, Dorg, then item number two, then. 1687 02:30:37,780 --> 02:30:38,820 Yeah, I'll just mention this. 1688 02:30:38,900 --> 02:30:40,860 So the left investment statement is there. 1689 02:30:41,280 --> 02:30:42,580 If you have any questions. 1690 02:30:44,100 --> 02:30:45,660 I can give you, I guess, just a brief update. 1691 02:30:45,900 --> 02:30:49,000 Bob and I spoke with Kyle over with the camp. 1692 02:30:49,000 --> 02:30:53,560 And we are going to be moving some funds over to the camp fund. 1693 02:30:53,560 --> 02:30:56,340 I'd say in the next week or so. 1694 02:30:57,180 --> 02:30:57,660 Okay. 1695 02:30:57,660 --> 02:31:05,760 And then the third item was a quarterly budget project status which I apologize for the very small print we will make that bigger for the next quarter 1696 02:31:05,760 --> 02:31:15,640 But this report again shows up quarterly and it lists the districts open capital projects and the percent budget used and the percent completion with some notes there 1697 02:31:15,640 --> 02:31:21,600 So that just keeps the board updated on what staff is working on and where we are with each of the projects 1698 02:31:21,600 --> 02:31:30,320 Is he questions? I have a question on the U.S. bank. Are they starting behaving like a real bank for us or are they just? 1699 02:31:31,300 --> 02:31:38,860 Yes, so that's conversations. So I'm going so they did reduce for the GSA number of the fees through December. 1700 02:31:40,000 --> 02:31:46,760 We're working with them to cut down the fees for the district operating account. 1701 02:31:46,760 --> 02:31:55,160 It's all related to our mobile, we're online banking and the different services, so we're going working with them to see what exactly services we need. 1702 02:31:55,760 --> 02:31:59,100 So we can cut down those fees for that, but so far, so good. 1703 02:31:59,280 --> 02:32:01,900 They are being cooperative in terms of working with us. 1704 02:32:02,300 --> 02:32:11,020 Okay, and I'll really bring it up because I was told by a representative of US Bank, as long as you do everything online, there are no fees, and it doesn't sound like that's what. 1705 02:32:11,020 --> 02:32:18,940 Well, we don't do everything online because we do get quite a bit of what we do get checks and we get cash and so we do have to make deposits 1706 02:32:18,940 --> 02:32:27,400 So the daily deposits, so that's not online. We do get the checks that we get processed through the mouth. 1707 02:32:27,580 --> 02:32:32,920 Do get sent over in a file. So it is online, but again, we still get quite a bit of walk through a walk in traffic. 1708 02:32:34,260 --> 02:32:39,500 Okay, again, I don't want to get into this, but the bottom line is there. 1709 02:32:41,220 --> 02:32:43,720 In my opinion, they should be charging anything. 1710 02:32:44,020 --> 02:32:49,260 I mean, they should be happy that you're their customer, and even, you know, you're the 1711 02:32:49,260 --> 02:32:49,640 positive. 1712 02:32:49,940 --> 02:32:50,460 You're scanning in. 1713 02:32:50,640 --> 02:32:55,240 Again, there should be no, you guys are scanning in the walk them in. 1714 02:32:55,560 --> 02:32:56,080 We do both. 1715 02:32:56,300 --> 02:33:00,620 The checks that are mailed in are scanned in the files and over. 1716 02:33:01,100 --> 02:33:06,440 The checks that are walked in are different file and those are deposited along with the cash. 1717 02:33:07,180 --> 02:33:08,860 And again, I don't want to get in the middle of this. 1718 02:33:08,860 --> 02:33:12,820 but I would like to see what they're really charging us. 1719 02:33:14,220 --> 02:33:16,220 And again, I'm not suggesting that you check 1720 02:33:16,220 --> 02:33:20,440 some of the other banks, but there might be better 1721 02:33:20,440 --> 02:33:21,320 value out there for you. 1722 02:33:21,580 --> 02:33:21,920 That's awesome. 1723 02:33:22,600 --> 02:33:23,060 Thank you. 1724 02:33:23,140 --> 02:33:23,380 Thank you. 1725 02:33:23,480 --> 02:33:24,480 That's my personal opinion. 1726 02:33:28,160 --> 02:33:31,660 Then we got 9B and junior report. 1727 02:33:33,180 --> 02:33:41,380 Yeah, I only have one thing on this, just that we are working 1728 02:33:41,380 --> 02:33:49,520 And with the city on Bridge Replacement Project, over Carpenter Avenue, over Carpenter Creek. 1729 02:33:50,580 --> 02:33:59,700 And so the city has begun to move forward on that project and that will involve us replacing 1730 02:33:59,700 --> 02:34:04,500 the pipeline leading to the bridge and then the city will be in charge or will be responsible 1731 02:34:04,500 --> 02:34:08,500 for hanging a new pipe on the bridge that will connect in. 1732 02:34:10,500 --> 02:34:16,680 So that's been a project that's been around for a while, and we think it's going to be 1733 02:34:16,680 --> 02:34:17,020 started. 1734 02:34:17,580 --> 02:34:20,920 That's what the messaging from the city has come as saying. 1735 02:34:21,380 --> 02:34:25,920 That was a question if they could find a contractor, did they find a contractor to do the job? 1736 02:34:28,900 --> 02:34:35,900 I don't think they've advertised it yet, I think they're still working on the details of actually 1737 02:34:35,900 --> 02:34:37,620 getting it out. And the funding. 1738 02:34:39,940 --> 02:34:46,560 And then as far as letters of intent, to serve a lot of 1739 02:34:46,560 --> 02:34:59,900 ADUs, have been issued in December. There's just some small renovations, also, that had 1740 02:34:59,900 --> 02:35:06,020 There's only one that actually adds a little bit of square footage on on Beach Club Road. 1741 02:35:07,240 --> 02:35:10,980 No big developments have been issued a letter. 1742 02:35:11,400 --> 02:35:19,260 There was an intake of a big development on Craven, a 1360 Craven's Lane. 1743 02:35:19,940 --> 02:35:23,660 Still in review with that particular project. 1744 02:35:24,680 --> 02:35:27,140 So we have not issued that letter yet. 1745 02:35:28,640 --> 02:35:32,240 And then again, we more recently, 1746 02:35:34,620 --> 02:35:40,020 I'll see you again, one for an ADU in Rancho Monteligre, 1747 02:35:41,320 --> 02:35:46,300 and then another ADU on Cramer Road, so a lot of ADUs are happening. 1748 02:35:47,100 --> 02:35:53,900 And as I understand the ADU laws are changing this year again, so they're making the barriers lower. 1749 02:35:53,900 --> 02:36:02,160 and so we're going to see probably a continuation of letters of letters of requests for ADU. 1750 02:36:06,910 --> 02:36:15,030 So, for the operations report, nothing to report here on the monthly SAS report, but I did 1751 02:36:15,030 --> 02:36:22,390 want to report that we had a uptick of calls about our fire hydrants and the readiness 1752 02:36:22,390 --> 02:36:27,610 for fires, which is understandable, given the stories that we're coming out of the Palaces 1753 02:36:27,610 --> 02:36:28,190 Fire. 1754 02:36:30,030 --> 02:36:36,930 And so I wrote an article for the coastal view that we'll come out tomorrow, just kind 1755 02:36:36,930 --> 02:36:39,930 of highlighting some of the details of our system. 1756 02:36:40,770 --> 02:36:46,170 Our system is, I think, very well prepared, as well as the staff as well as well prepared 1757 02:36:46,170 --> 02:36:49,010 because we've had such a recent experience with the Thomas Fire. 1758 02:36:49,930 --> 02:36:58,650 We are fortunate to have not too many tanks, but we, you know, the majority of the tanks 1759 02:36:58,650 --> 02:37:03,930 with the exception of Shepard Mesa tank, all the tanks with the exception of Shepard Mesa 1760 02:37:03,930 --> 02:37:11,070 are buried concrete tanks, so they're not really vulnerable to fire, like melting in 1761 02:37:11,070 --> 02:37:16,430 some agencies where you have bolted steel tanks, those will actually melt and you will 1762 02:37:16,430 --> 02:37:24,290 water pressure that way. We also have generators on all of our pumping stations so in the 1763 02:37:24,290 --> 02:37:30,910 event that power goes out which is very common during wildfire we have an ability to keep pumping 1764 02:37:30,910 --> 02:37:44,310 water into those tanks. We have about 27 million, 27 million gallons of water storage in the district 1765 02:37:44,310 --> 02:37:53,110 which depending on how you make the calculation gives us up to a days, you know, if no other 1766 02:37:53,110 --> 02:37:59,430 water is flowing into these tanks, we have a full day of water supply to fight fires that 1767 02:38:00,090 --> 02:38:01,830 elevated flow rates. 1768 02:38:03,470 --> 02:38:10,050 The other thing to remember is we have the ability or cater as the ability to move 10 million 1769 02:38:10,050 --> 02:38:19,170 a day into our service area. So really, it's a really unlikely that we'll see a situation 1770 02:38:19,170 --> 02:38:26,570 that was seen in palaces where the demand was simply outpacing the ability of the system 1771 02:38:26,570 --> 02:38:34,430 to recharge because we have quite a bit of throughput in our system. Thanks to the South Dakota's conduits, 1772 02:38:34,430 --> 02:38:37,950 of very large transmission mean really can push a lot of water. 1773 02:38:38,110 --> 02:38:40,310 We also have two very large reservoirs, 1774 02:38:40,550 --> 02:38:41,830 or take a reservoir and carbon reservoir, 1775 02:38:42,230 --> 02:38:43,570 that's sort of a lot of water. 1776 02:38:46,130 --> 02:38:49,890 And then I will just plug the intertype project 1777 02:38:49,890 --> 02:38:53,150 is one of the things that it's attempting to do 1778 02:38:53,850 --> 02:38:56,050 is address the vulnerability of having 1779 02:38:56,050 --> 02:38:58,310 a single pipe coming into the water district. 1780 02:38:59,250 --> 02:39:04,350 So rather than if ever we had multiple calamities 1781 02:39:04,350 --> 02:39:10,210 happening. First quake happens, breaks the south, goes kind of into it, then a fire starts, 1782 02:39:10,830 --> 02:39:15,510 then we want to have another way to get water and so that's what the disease interchange will 1783 02:39:15,510 --> 02:39:23,750 allow us to do. So we're in fairly good shape. That's what it's standing. Yeah, one last thing I 1784 02:39:23,750 --> 02:39:33,510 did want to give props to the operations department is they have been for a year now and they'll 1785 02:39:33,510 --> 02:39:38,830 continue to do this, going to each hydrant, making sure that the operating nuts work, 1786 02:39:39,030 --> 02:39:44,050 looping the operating nuts, checking the valves, making sure they work, making sure 1787 02:39:44,050 --> 02:39:49,210 that the valves are on, the water is there when the fire departments get to a fighter 1788 02:39:49,210 --> 02:39:51,890 register, get to the hydrants, make sure there's water available. 1789 02:39:53,050 --> 02:39:58,150 So we're about 90% done with that exercise and once we get done, we'll just continue to 1790 02:39:58,150 --> 02:40:01,770 we'll start back at the beginning and do the same inspection. 1791 02:40:03,510 --> 02:40:05,550 So that is all newsworthy. 1792 02:40:06,330 --> 02:40:07,950 So did you already go look about tomorrow? 1793 02:40:09,590 --> 02:40:12,610 I had a question on these fire hydrants when one is off, 1794 02:40:12,610 --> 02:40:16,910 do we have protection that there is a shadow valve, 1795 02:40:16,970 --> 02:40:17,770 like an oil wells? 1796 02:40:18,090 --> 02:40:22,310 Yeah, we have what's called, it's a little ball check valve, 1797 02:40:22,870 --> 02:40:25,670 basically I forget the name of the product, 1798 02:40:25,670 --> 02:40:28,410 But it essentially has a pin and when it gets 1799 02:40:28,410 --> 02:40:31,430 sure off the pin pops up and a little ball plugs 1800 02:40:31,430 --> 02:40:31,990 the hole. 1801 02:40:32,670 --> 02:40:36,090 So what you get is about a quarter inch stream in the air 1802 02:40:36,090 --> 02:40:39,670 of water that you can see, but it's not water. 1803 02:40:39,970 --> 02:40:40,970 It's not flooding everywhere. 1804 02:40:41,330 --> 02:40:42,890 All right, yeah, I was wondering about that. 1805 02:40:43,150 --> 02:40:44,810 I saw what these idiots, you know, they break them 1806 02:40:44,810 --> 02:40:49,370 and they sell them and then it's all here. 1807 02:40:49,370 --> 02:40:50,310 I'll be your article. 1808 02:40:51,450 --> 02:40:53,810 I vaguely remember there used to be something 1809 02:40:53,810 --> 02:40:57,470 He's going to like a dry pipe or dry stack, hydrant, and then we replace those. 1810 02:40:58,050 --> 02:40:58,110 Dry barrels? 1811 02:40:58,110 --> 02:40:58,770 Dry barrels? 1812 02:40:58,970 --> 02:40:59,970 We've replaced all those. 1813 02:40:59,970 --> 02:41:00,690 Those are long guns. 1814 02:41:00,910 --> 02:41:05,850 Do you think that was partially what they had, dry barrels, hydrants that were broken? 1815 02:41:06,130 --> 02:41:06,810 It's possible. 1816 02:41:07,150 --> 02:41:07,170 Yeah. 1817 02:41:07,310 --> 02:41:12,070 So that would be the nut, you know, the nut on the top brings up the valve as clear 1818 02:41:12,070 --> 02:41:12,710 underground. 1819 02:41:14,070 --> 02:41:20,150 So, part of, you know, from the articles that I've read, part of it was a reservoir, a major 1820 02:41:20,150 --> 02:41:22,030 reservoir was down for maintenance. 1821 02:41:23,070 --> 02:41:23,390 Winner. 1822 02:41:23,390 --> 02:41:31,810 Yeah, part of it was the system just wasn't designed to bring those tanks up as quickly as the water was being trained out, 1823 02:41:35,030 --> 02:41:35,030 so 1824 02:41:35,030 --> 02:41:38,150 Yeah, please make it up in all your fire hydros, there's another water right 1825 02:41:40,310 --> 02:41:42,450 Thank you Bob 1826 02:41:43,310 --> 02:41:48,490 Blue one good item number 10 close session 1827 02:41:49,230 --> 02:41:53,590 Oh, did you want me to do the water splider parts? Sorry. Oh, sorry. Yeah 1828 02:41:53,590 --> 02:41:57,850 go for it. Yeah, we know what it means. I've never listened to these events. I don't need to see them again. 1829 02:41:58,470 --> 02:42:03,350 All right. Well, let me just highlight it then because, you know, me, so it does a lot of work on these things. 1830 02:42:03,470 --> 02:42:11,070 I think, you know, it's worth talking about. So this is just a picture of our overall surface watch by compared to previous years. 1831 02:42:11,250 --> 02:42:14,270 And so you can see we're actually in a better position that we've been in. 1832 02:42:14,690 --> 02:42:20,670 And this is largely because of carryover and new year allocations kind of stacking up. 1833 02:42:21,450 --> 02:42:27,930 Now, I will say we've received so little rain this year, I'm pretty certain that this 1834 02:42:27,930 --> 02:42:33,750 will look very different next year in terms of our water supply available in some 1835 02:42:33,750 --> 02:42:43,690 of these water storage reservoirs, groundwater, so lower than, you know, drought years 1836 02:42:43,690 --> 02:42:48,970 previous, but a little bit more than wet years where we had a lot of rain. 1837 02:42:51,730 --> 02:42:56,790 Our pumping target is this orange line, and I mean, you can kind of see, oops, I'm sorry 1838 02:42:56,790 --> 02:42:58,210 about that. 1839 02:42:58,930 --> 02:43:00,910 I'm going to change my method here. 1840 02:43:02,830 --> 02:43:07,550 Our pumping target is the orange line, so we try to pump about a thousand acre feed each year 1841 02:43:07,550 --> 02:43:08,250 of groundwater. 1842 02:43:09,250 --> 02:43:10,870 That's a long-term target. 1843 02:43:10,870 --> 02:43:14,410 We'll sometimes go under that, sometimes go over that. 1844 02:43:15,310 --> 02:43:18,510 Currently, or as of November, we were at 7.68. 1845 02:43:18,650 --> 02:43:20,170 Currently, we actually have already 1846 02:43:20,170 --> 02:43:24,330 at the 1000-acre feet of production. 1847 02:43:24,550 --> 02:43:26,830 The reason why it's a little bit front and loaded. 1848 02:43:27,910 --> 02:43:30,990 So starting in January, we're really not pumping anything 1849 02:43:32,490 --> 02:43:34,010 until July 1. 1850 02:43:34,010 --> 02:43:55,030 is that we were the Kachuma is relatively full, and if there were storms coming through what we wanted to be in the position to do is turn off the wells, still have a matter of target, but then start taking a supplemental water from Kachuma which is excess water. 1851 02:43:56,610 --> 02:44:01,670 That didn't happen, or it doesn't look like it's going to happen, but who knows, we could 1852 02:44:01,670 --> 02:44:03,550 have a March or February miracle. 1853 02:44:07,130 --> 02:44:12,450 This is kind of the consumption year over year again, you can see our consumption is 1854 02:44:12,450 --> 02:44:15,730 down, or it's pretty close to previous years. 1855 02:44:16,550 --> 02:44:21,210 This is a little bit strange in that, this is just for November, but this is a little strange 1856 02:44:21,210 --> 02:44:28,390 in that it's higher for a wetter year and that could have been because the rainfall last year 1857 02:44:28,390 --> 02:44:36,690 or in 23 was later and the rainfall this year was early but it was very, very minute. 1858 02:44:40,010 --> 02:44:50,650 So this graph just kind of shows the wetness and so you can kind of see this as demand 1859 02:44:50,650 --> 02:44:59,950 And this is these two lines depict kind of the average of a wet year that we would expect in demand in the average of a drug. 1860 02:45:00,000 --> 02:45:29,800 And so you can see dryers are higher, weters are lower. We're kind of threading that needle. And you can see that early, like in August, September, we were acting more like it was a wet year. And now that we've gone through December and we're halfway through January. And we've really seen no rain. It was a demand of starting to act like it's a dryer. So, we've got a lot of work to do. 1861 02:45:37,970 --> 02:45:43,650 that's the final yeah so so they've already made an initial I think it's 15% currently so 1862 02:45:43,650 --> 02:45:51,570 they I think they need a 5% and they brought up to 15% in December or in January so they'll 1863 02:45:51,570 --> 02:45:57,470 keep going up if if it does rain but if it doesn't rain it did rain in Northern California a couple 1864 02:45:57,470 --> 02:46:01,530 It's a big storm scheme in the North of Gal, a little different than what we have here. 1865 02:46:04,110 --> 02:46:10,990 So this is axails on the left and M and I sails on the right and you kind of see the 1866 02:46:10,990 --> 02:46:17,230 original line is our target line and the gray line is our max expected and you can see on 1867 02:46:17,230 --> 02:46:24,490 the left that we're on axails we're seeing maximum sales so that is reflection of the 1868 02:46:24,490 --> 02:46:30,450 practice, lack of rainfall during even the earlier parts of the year. 1869 02:46:31,370 --> 02:46:34,730 This is based on the fiscal years that starts in July. 1870 02:46:36,930 --> 02:46:41,010 And then, M&I is below, which is interesting, 1871 02:46:43,170 --> 02:46:47,250 we think this is again reflecting some of 1872 02:46:47,250 --> 02:46:53,350 the hardening that occurred during the last several periods of dry weather, where residents 1873 02:46:53,350 --> 02:46:57,610 or M&I users are starting, you know, they're just using less. 1874 02:46:58,630 --> 02:47:01,330 Lons have been removed, plumbing has been retrofitted, 1875 02:47:01,610 --> 02:47:04,710 behaviors have become routine. 1876 02:47:08,150 --> 02:47:09,590 Those two together, 1877 02:47:10,650 --> 02:47:13,350 result in this combined sales. 1878 02:47:13,570 --> 02:47:16,810 So we're within our targets own, 1879 02:47:16,970 --> 02:47:18,190 just a little bit above. 1880 02:47:18,770 --> 02:47:20,690 If we stay with that targets own, 1881 02:47:20,690 --> 02:47:30,710 will reach our budget at 35.07 of sales, and so that will be consistent with our budgeted 1882 02:47:30,710 --> 02:47:31,110 revenues. 1883 02:47:32,470 --> 02:47:33,550 I'll ask you a quick question on that. 1884 02:47:34,070 --> 02:47:36,750 What, how far under 35.07 is it a problem? 1885 02:47:38,430 --> 02:47:42,610 Like 10% at 1%, 20% problem for revenues? 1886 02:47:45,290 --> 02:47:49,890 Yeah, so we've had, I think we've had sales as low as 3,200. 1887 02:47:51,710 --> 02:47:57,990 And we didn't violate any of our coverage ratios, but it was close, so we get very close. 1888 02:48:02,800 --> 02:48:05,260 So this is January 7th, drought monitor. 1889 02:48:05,460 --> 02:48:13,380 You can kind of see there's some drought fears coming in. 1890 02:48:13,380 --> 02:48:18,460 You can see Santa Barbara is in the abnormally dry to moderate drought. 1891 02:48:18,460 --> 02:48:23,920 I think this will change if we don't get any rain before next month. 1892 02:48:24,000 --> 02:48:26,820 This will change probably into these darker colors. 1893 02:48:29,000 --> 02:48:35,660 We do have, again, reservoir conditions that are favorable for a single year drought. 1894 02:48:36,160 --> 02:48:40,920 If it goes into a multiple year drought, then we'll start to see, you know, similar activity 1895 02:48:40,920 --> 02:48:42,900 as we did in 2021, 1896 02:48:46,250 --> 02:48:46,250 22. 1897 02:48:46,890 --> 02:48:49,690 Again, I'll just highlight here for the year. 1898 02:48:49,910 --> 02:48:54,910 Kachima has seen 0.83 inches and carbonaries only seen 0.64, 1899 02:48:57,390 --> 02:49:03,850 so it's very, you know, to date is 9% 11% which it's hard to believe. 1900 02:49:05,890 --> 02:49:11,030 Most of the rain does fall in February, so we'll see this rapidly change. 1901 02:49:11,210 --> 02:49:14,810 If these don't change, we'll see this percentage rapidly change. 1902 02:49:17,280 --> 02:49:26,840 Again, reservoir conditions were, we're not full, full is 1992, 190,000 acre, 190, 1903 02:49:27,140 --> 02:49:35,140 3,000 acre feet, we're about 170,000, so we've used about 14,000 acre feet this year, 1904 02:49:35,280 --> 02:49:38,560 which is about half of the annual allocation of consumer. 1905 02:49:41,390 --> 02:49:47,930 Again, across the state, reservoirs are in very good condition for going into a drought. 1906 02:49:49,530 --> 02:49:51,650 That's it. 1907 02:49:52,290 --> 02:49:53,310 Thank you Bob any questions? 1908 02:49:54,330 --> 02:49:56,470 Then we move on to item number 10. 1909 02:49:57,190 --> 02:49:59,870 The closed session conference with Labor Negotiated 1910 02:49:59,870 --> 02:50:04,730 Pursuit to Government Code Section 54957.6. 1911 02:50:05,290 --> 02:50:08,550 District negotiator Robert McDonald's Employee Organization 1912 02:50:08,550 --> 02:50:10,770 Own Representative Employees. 1913 02:50:12,250 --> 02:50:12,530 So... 1914 02:50:12,530 --> 02:50:13,530 Recording stopped. 1915 03:27:09,710 --> 03:27:10,810 Good morning and progress.