[0:03] Okay, we're going to go ahead and call
the September 2nd, 2026 Board of Zoning
[0:07] Adjustments to order.
>> Roll call, please. Sarah
[0:10] » Bob Houston,
>> present.
[0:11] » Mike Morland.
>> Jeff Fletcher,
[0:14] » here.
>> We have a quorum. Please rise for the
[0:16] pledge.
I pledge algiance to the flag of the
[0:22] United States of America and to the
republic for which it stands. One nation
[0:28] under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all.
[0:37] » A motion to accept the agenda that
presented.
[0:39] » So move.
>> I'll second that. All in favor? Two
[0:42] votes, four, zero against. The motion to
approve the BZA meeting amends from
[0:46] April 1st, 2026. So move.
>> I'll second that. All in favor? Two
[0:51] votes. Four, zero against. Casc codes
and zoning department BZA variance
[0:56] number ZV34 for a zoning variance to
allow for a one-time event for the dates
[1:01] of October 16th and 17th, 2026. Commonly
known as 20906
[1:07] South State Route Yway, Belt, Missouri
64012. I need a motion.
[1:11] » So move.
>> I'll second that. Uh Valerie, staff
[1:14] report, please.
>> Uh this group did a fundraiser last
[1:17] year. um for a local boy and then they
had my understanding it was very
[1:21] successful. They want to do another
event this year to be able to help more
[1:24] families and people in the community. Um
they may continue this. We've went
[1:30] through the process of what it'll look
like if they decide to do that, but they
[1:33] would like to go ahead and go through
this one time variance for this event
[1:36] coming up this year.
>> Okay. Thank you, Valerie. Any questions
[1:39] for Valer? No.
>> This time we're going to open the public
[1:42] comment for variance number ZV34. If
you'd like to speak for or against it,
[1:46] please step forward. State your name.
Seeing none, we're going to close public
[1:51] comment on PZA variance ZV34. Any
further discussion?
[1:56] » No.
>> All in favor? Two votes for zero against
[2:00] variance ZV34 passes. Cass County codes
and zoning department. BCA variance
[2:06] number ZV35 for a zoning variance of a
lot with submitted by an Anna Taylor on
[2:12] behalf of Boonland Partners LLC
generally located on the south side of
[2:16] East 285th Street between South Oannon
Road and South Index Road, Garden City,
[2:21] Missouri. Need a motion.
>> So move.
[2:24] » I'll second that staff report, please.
Valerie.
[2:26] » Uh this property by survey is 189.4 ft
in width. Our minimum requirement is 220
[2:33] ft. It was surveyed out by an out of
county surveyor back in 2009. The
[2:38] property has switched hands multiple
times um since then and ultimately ended
[2:42] up being its own 5.77 76 acre track that
was transferred. Um the current owner
[2:49] did their due diligence when the title
company did everything that they thought
[2:53] they needed to do only to find out that
it never went through the proper zoning
[2:56] process to begin with even though it had
been sold. So they're wishing to request
[3:01] this variance for the narrower lot fit.
The setbacks on this property would
[3:05] still be 25 ft from side property lines
and 50 ft from the front and rear which
[3:10] they are aware of that and feel that
they can meet it with a new single
[3:14] family dwelling should it be approved.
>> Do you know how long ago that was split?
[3:17] » Uh in 2009 was when the survey was done.
It was originally sold off as a separate
[3:24] track from what I could tell in
2010.
[3:31] and zoning been in effect in the county
since 198.
[3:36] » All right. Thank you, Valerie. Any
questions for her right now? No.
[3:39] » Okay. At this time, we're going to open
the public comment for variance numbers
[3:43] ZV35. If you'd like to speak for against
it, please state your name and address.
[3:50] Okay.
[3:53] [clears throat]
Uh Randy Stley, Garden City, Missouri.
[3:57] Melinda Stegley.
>> Hi.
[4:01] » Okay. Uh,
our land lays on the south side of this
[4:07] piece of land.
We don't we want a house there. That's
[4:11] why we're here. But
the codes ladies told me it had to be
[4:16] 250 foot wide. Now you're saying 220
today,
[4:20] but it's still it's only 190 or 189,
whatever.
[4:25] This this piece of property is a quarter
mile long by 190. That's just not fit
[4:30] for a building lot in my opinion.
Okay. So, next thing I'd like to say is
[4:37] that property was sold for hunting,
which that is prime cash county hunting
[4:42] with the rough quarry being across the
road. Uh that's what the last person did
[4:47] with it.
But the problem I got here is is this
[4:52] Texas bunch that bought this, they
obviously didn't check with the codes
[4:56] department about wanting to sell this to
build the house or they would have knew
[5:00] it was too narrow.
So my plea is
[5:05] they're asking you to bend the rules so
they can profit. And I think that's
[5:09] wrong. So I'll let my wife talk.
>> Um like she said, the wit is a codes
[5:17] violation. There's also codes violation.
There's supposed to be a 1:4 ratio of
[5:22] width to length and the ratio is 6.95.
It's quite a bit over the 1 to4 ratio.
[5:33] So there's,
as far as we can tell, there's two code
[5:37] violations there.
>> Thank you. Thank you all very much.
[5:41] » Thank you.
>> Anyone else like to speak for or against
[5:44] uh zoning variance 35? Please state your
name.
[5:49] [clears throat]
[5:52] » I'm Mark Williams and this is Connie
Williams and we live at 39001 East 285th
[5:58] Street. We are right next door and we
would also not like to see a house built
[6:04] there too. We would originally bought
the property knowing that it was only
[6:09] hunting property all the way around us.
it was for hunting or it was zoned for
[6:14] agriculture. And that piece of property
was originally a uh rideway to Ry's
[6:21] property which he bought in 80 acres
below that to the south of that and
[6:25] that's where it attached to.
He he eventually sold it to one of his
[6:30] buddies who thought it was hunting land.
He said, "Hey, I I you know, it's a big
[6:34] narrow thing. I can't put my cattle on
there. I can't do much about it. So, you
[6:38] know, here you go, you say give them
don't they'll get them money. He went on
[6:42] and about and then so to our knowledge
from that point on you know we we know
[6:47] all of our neighbors around us and
everything and we've always had no
[6:49] problem but it's like all they did was
hunt them on there so it's no big deal.
[6:53] So and they always took care of the
property and everything but it was not
[6:56] expecting to have you know a piece of a
any kind of house on there. Also on the
[7:03] uh east side there's a creek, pretty
substantial creek. It's dry most of the
[7:09] time, but when it rains, it rains, it
fills up very large and it comes down,
[7:17] it washes out that road almost every
time,
[7:20] » right? Right in front of it.
>> I know we've called the county to come
[7:23] in and put two loads of gravel on it
just over the summertime because we
[7:28] couldn't even drive a car down there. We
have a a road there that's uh got a
[7:35] what is it? A
>> low water.
[7:37] » Low water bridge.
>> A low water bridge. And it floods very
[7:40] large several times every year. And
sometimes we get closed down. We can't
[7:44] even get out and we have to go the other
way. And that road gets washed out. So
[7:48] they it doesn't get washed out. We can't
get out. But it so far but it it washes
[7:52] out too. And you know it's like it's
just like we got more traffic in there
[7:56] and a building on there putting all
kinds of traffic coming in. Anyway,
[8:01] there's supposed to be a a certain
distance between our fence
[8:05] » for our yard and a house. And I can't
figure out how you could ever put a
[8:09] house on there with the creek on the
other side worrying about washing out
[8:14] from that brick. I I just don't I that's
about all I
[8:20] » We don't We don't want to bend the
rules. Um, we were forced to pay the
[8:23] rules when we were we built over there
and we this is a rule that helps us and
[8:28] we think you guys should stick to it
because you're trying to cram a tiny
[8:32] little house in there. They don't know
about the flood because they probably
[8:35] have never been out here when it's
flooded. But it'll it floods bad and it
[8:41] just is it's just going to be a problem
all the way around and we need, you
[8:46] know, no less than 1,000 square foot
house and then we need our 24 feet on
[8:50] both sides. But they may not be able to
do that on the side of where that pond
[8:54] or where that creek is. It may have to
be more than that to to get it to fit.
[8:59] And it's another thing too. It's like
the this real estate agent come in and
[9:04] they they go around and they just buy
pieces of property and and they develop
[9:08] it and that's that's fine and dandy, but
this this property is not set up for
[9:13] developing. And they came in offered
this guy a ton of money, twice as much
[9:17] as he had for it. And then she's going
to go and turn around and sell it for
[9:21] twice as much as it is just to get
because it's going to eventually it has
[9:25] to become residential so that they can
sell it house on it and that's the only
[9:30] way that she could ever make the money
on it. I understand that but on the
[9:34] other hand she shouldn't have bought it
in the first place.
[9:37] » So they didn't do the due diligence the
sellers needed to hear. I don't think
[9:41] so. That's what happened. Thank you.
>> Okay. Thank you all. Anyone else would
[9:45] like to speak for against zoning
barriers 35?
[9:50] » Yes. Um, my name is Emmy Hulk and my
husband and I, Scott, own the property
[9:54] to the east of this. Um, we are on the
side that has the creek and I've
[9:59] wondered that also how it does. It'll
it'll it floods. It washes out. Um, but
[10:05] [clears throat] I just agree with the
other two of
[10:09] lived in Cass County. I've had to follow
rules and I just feel like it's fair to
[10:13] ask others to do that also. So,
>> okay. Thank you very much.
[10:18] Anyone else like to speak for variance
ZV35?
[10:23] » Hi, I'm Anna Turner. I represent the
owner, Boon Land Partners. Um, I would
[10:29] just reiterate what the staff report
found. This has been a non-compliant
[10:33] parcel from for as far as we can tell
from 2009. It's currently zoned
[10:38] agricultural, but my understanding is it
does not comply with those requirements
[10:42] which require at least a 20 acre lot. I
think in this case is less than six. So,
[10:47] it's currently non-compliant with the
existing zoning designation. Um, this
[10:52] current variance we're requesting is a
difference of, you know, 30 feet
[10:57] essentially. Um, and that would bring
this parcel in compliance for the first
[11:01] time in almost 20 years with the code.
Um the owner did do substantial due
[11:07] diligence before it was purchased and
has since worked with the uh planning
[11:11] department um to do everything he is
able to bring this in compliance with
[11:16] the zoning code and I'm happy to answer
any questions if anyone has any.
[11:23] » Thank you.
>> Okay. Thank you.
[11:26] » So Valerie, when it split off in 2009,
who who sold it if it was il illegal to
[11:31] start with? It was sold by the Steckleys
and Holtwigs.
[11:36] » Well, I'm going to
>> I'll speak again if you don't mind.
[11:41] » So, when I talked to the codes ladies,
they told me they said, "Well, you sold
[11:47] that illegally. That's piece of land."
Okay. So, I went to a professional real
[11:53] estate agent. He drawled up the
paperwork, took it to the uh recorder's
[11:59] office, did everything. Uh sometime
later, the recorder called me, some
[12:05] lady, and said, "Okay, this is kind of
an odd piece of land. Is this this
[12:09] right?" And I said, "That's right." She
goes, "Okay." So, I'd like for somebody
[12:13] to tell me how I sold it illegally if I
sold it for agriculture purposes. I
[12:18] wasn't trying to sell it for
residential.
[12:20] » Okay. It's not question answer. It's
just statements. Okay.
[12:23] » Okay. So, so I sold it.
>> So, Valer,
[12:29] I guess we're doing a variance, but I'm
not sure I understand 100% what's going
[12:37] on here. So, how much are we variance on
the
[12:42] » the minimum is 220 foot in width is what
was required by the zoning order. this
[12:48] tract.
[12:51] » I've heard a lot of numbers today and I
was told
[12:54] » 189.4 foot in width based on the survey
that was done in 2009. The depth is
[13:00] 1,324.83
ft.
[13:04] 5.76 acres total is what this tracted
ground is.
[13:09] » Okay. So if we do the variance, it
doesn't go back to planning and zoning.
[13:16] Correct.
>> It is said under the commission for
[13:20] later this day based on what the
planning board heard at that planning
[13:24] board meeting. Their vote was to deny it
for the simple fact that typically these
[13:28] go to the BCA before it comes to them
due to timewise all of that. I made the
[13:35] administrative decision to go and have
planning board hear it. you guys hear it
[13:38] and then you can make that vote as the
commission based off either the planning
[13:43] board's recommendation or what the only
reason for denial on them was just
[13:48] procedural that it had not the variance
had not been approved by the BCA prior
[13:51] to them hearing it at the planning board
meeting. I was not at that meeting to
[13:55] explain further the situation on the
property.
[13:58] » Can we go back to planning and zoning? I
know you made that
[14:01] » to be heard till the end of October.
>> And is there a reason that I know you
[14:05] made that decision? Can we go back to
planning and zoning? Is there a reason?
[14:09] » You can. The only reason was a timewise.
Um, the person that owns the property,
[14:13] they've already done their soil testing.
They were ready to get moving on a on a
[14:18] build on this property. Whenever this
came to light, they did do their due
[14:23] diligence. They went through the title
company. Um, they even stated they
[14:27] called our office. And if you look at
the platbooks uh even from 2009
[14:34] by looking at you would think it was its
own tract. Whether that's right or wrong
[14:39] is either here or there but it has been
indicated a separate track since that
[14:44] nbook.
I
[14:46] » I'm at the opinion of I don't know if
this is one of those conversations we
[14:50] can have right now. I mean I I think
that we need to give the planning and
[14:54] zoning their chance to do it beyond the
procedural piece. That's what they're
[14:59] here for. Correct.
>> Right now, the only thing the BCA is
[15:03] hearing is the variance on the lot
width.
[15:07] » The file for the actual split is to be
heard by the commission.
[15:12] » This is whether we approve the the
>> varian like we've approved in past for
[15:18] potty ponds. It may have set closer to a
property line or a barn. It may have
[15:21] just for the figuration of the lots,
>> but we don't have approval from the
[15:25] planning and zoning. This is the only
the variance. The part that you get the
[15:28] approval from the planning and zoning is
on the next file uh 3209
[15:34] » on commission.
>> It's on commission.
[15:37] » Okay.
>> Planning board wouldn't typically weigh
[15:40] in on the
>> They would not weigh in on the variance.
[15:42] No,
>> they would not weigh in on the varants.
[15:44] » Sorry, that
>> sure
[15:48] questions.
[15:51] You have a motion to approve
BZA variance ZV35.
[15:59] » No.
[16:03] » So, do not have a motion to approve.
I'll make a motion to approve it. Do I
[16:07] have a second?
>> No.
[16:08] » Okay. So, it's going to die and go, I
guess, be done on this denied at this
[16:15] time. Died for a lack of a second.
>> Side for a lack of a second at this
[16:18] time.
Okay. Need a motion to adjurnn the BZA
[16:24] meeting at this time.
>> So move.
[16:26] » I'll second that. All in favor. Two
votes forward, zero against. At this
[16:31] time, we're going to call to order the
September 2nd, 2026 uh commission
[16:36] meeting. I need a roll call, please.
Sarah
[16:38] » Bob Houston.
>> Yes. Present.
[16:40] » Mike Morland. Jeff Fletcher.
>> Here we have a quorum. Any motion to
[16:45] accept the agenda is presented.
So moved. I'll second that. All in
[16:50] favor? Two votes, four, zero against.
The a motion to approve the commission
[16:55] commission meeting minutes for August
19th, 2026.
[17:00] » So move.
>> I'll second that. All in favor? Two
[17:03] votes for zero against. Any motion to
approve the work session minutes from
[17:07] August 12th, 2026, effective new sales
tax and road and bridges department.
[17:11] August 19th, 2026, review applications
for Cass County Planning Board. and
[17:16] August 19th, 2026, the Senate Bill
three.
[17:22] And August 20th, 26, the department head
meeting.
[17:25] » So moved.
>> Second that. All in favor? Two votes for
[17:29] zero against. Uh C County Clerk's office
resolution 2684 authorizing
[17:36] signers on the bank accounts held by the
Cass County Circuit Clerk. I need a
[17:40] motion.
>> So moved.
[17:42] » Second that, Steve. That's just simply
because Kim resigned and we're putting
[17:46] Sandy Massie, the interim circuit
clerk's name on the bank account so they
[17:51] can do business.
>> Okay.
[17:53] » Thank you very much. Any discussion?
[clears throat]
[17:56] All in favor? Two votes for zero against
resolution or resolution 2684 passes.
[18:02] Cass County codes and zoning department
application 3207 minor subdivision of
[18:06] apparent track of 96 plus or minus
parcel with agriculture rating commonly
[18:14] known as 32701 South state route 7raton
Missouri 64739. Any motion?
[18:20] » So moved.
>> I'll second that. Valerie, staff report,
[18:23] please.
>> Uh this was heard by the planning board.
[18:26] Uh there was a neighboring couple that
showed up that had questions where the
[18:29] tracks were located. They didn't want
one of the tracks to be zoned
[18:32] residential, but it falls under the 20
acre threshold for agricultural zoning.
[18:38] Um, so by our zoning order, it requires
residential zoning. The board ultimately
[18:43] approved unanimously in favor to app
recommend approval of this application.
[18:48] It will get rid of the CZ zoning. There
was kind of when Seven Highway was
[18:53] two-lane, there was like a strip. It was
a trim fiberglass repair place. Uh Roxy
[18:58] and her husband owned it for years and
she continued to own it afterwards. This
[19:02] will get rid of that extra little C2
zoning on each side of it, but the old
[19:08] actual boat repair place, but there was
a lot line adjustment. It's already been
[19:12] sold. It it retains it. It is not part
of this action.
[19:15] » Okay.
[cough and clears throat]
[19:17] » Any discussion for our
>> No.
[19:19] » At this time, we're going to open uh any
public comment for application 3207. If
[19:24] you'd like to step forward, speak for or
against that application.
[19:30] » I'm Mark Gapole representing Dustin Doll
application 3207.
[19:34] I have nothing else to talk about.
Thanks, Mark. Appreciate that. Anyone
[19:40] else?
Okay, seeing none, we're going to close
[19:44] the public comment portion on
application 3207. Any further
[19:48] discussion? All in favor? Two votes,
four zero against. Application 3207
[19:54] passes. Thank you. Cass County codes and
zoning department application 3208 lot
[19:58] split res7
plus or minus acres with the zoning
[20:03] designation of agriculture commonly
known as 29 29101 South Nelson Road
[20:08] Cleveland, Missouri 64734.
I need a motion. So move. I'll second
[20:13] that. Valerie staff report please.
>> This application was heard by the
[20:16] planning board. It's kind of just a
little 17 acre track that is off a a
[20:19] very nice rectangular agricultural
track. Um the current owner chose to
[20:25] sell it off as a residential track just
because there's kind of a little more
[20:27] value there than there is to continue
farming it. The planning board
[20:31] recommended approval 6 to zero.
>> Thank you.
[20:35] » At this time, we're going to open a
public comment portion of application
[20:38] 3208. You'd like to speak for or against
the application, please step forward,
[20:42] state your name. I'm Rod Smith and I'm
representing Hornets Creek Land Company
[20:47] and I'd like to get disapproved.
>> Thank you, Ryan. Any further comments
[20:52] today? If you'd like to speak for that
application number,
[20:56] seeing none, we're going to close the
public comment portion of application
[20:59] 3208. Any further discussion? All in
favor? Two votes, four, zero against.
[21:05] Application 3208 passes.
Cass County Zoning Department
[21:10] application 3209.
Is this the one that we just So I guess
[21:15] we will strike that from the agenda and
there will not be a vote on that since
[21:19] the variance was not approved on that.
So u go ahead though since it's on there
[21:25] and it came with the recommendation.
>> It did come in the recommendation. Yeah.
[21:29] » So we should just for the
for finality go ahead and make a motion
[21:35] one way or the other.
>> Okay. Cass County zoning application
[21:39] number 3209 lot split and reszoning
parent traffic bay plaster minus acres
[21:44] uh genally located on the south side of
East 285th Street and between South
[21:48] Oannon Road and South Index Road Garden
City Missouri 64747
[21:53] need a motion
[21:58] » you have to make the motion
>> well I know where this go I guess we're
[22:02] going to let untable for lack of a
motion
[22:08] And we will go on to the next item. Cass
County Codes and Zoning Department
[22:11] ordinance 2608, an ordinance amending
section 410.040
[22:17] of Casc County Code relating to water
pollution hazards and setback
[22:21] requirements for concentrated animal
feeding operations. I need a motion.
[22:25] » So moved.
>> I'll second that. So this was Mike
[22:28] Morland working with the Agarelli
designation for the county. the setbacks
[22:32] had to get changed to align with this
organization's force to be designated as
[22:37] an aggra county. So that's what this
>> been working on that for a long time.
[22:40] » Working on a long time. So uh any
further discussion? All in favor? Two
[22:45] votes for zero against ordinance number
2608 passes. Uh, Cass County Collector's
[22:50] Office requesting dispersement of 2025
tax sale surplus money certificate of
[22:55] purchase number 25-17, tax sale number
346, taxpayer name Michael and Roberta
[23:01] Typton in amount $34,64411
[23:05] payable to Theresa Hunt. I need a
motion.
[23:07] » So moved.
>> Mr. Mullenor.
[23:09] » Good afternoon. This is a a good story.
This is a parcel I sold on the steps a
[23:15] year ago. uh the Typton got in right
under the one one-year mark and were
[23:20] able to redeem. So this is simply uh the
surplus money that will go back to uh
[23:25] the real estate investor, Mrs. H.
>> Thank you, Mr. Mullenor. Any further
[23:30] discussion?
>> No.
[23:31] » All in favor? Two votes for zero against
certificate
[23:37] number 2517. Thank you, Mr. Mort.
>> Thank you. At this time, we'll open the
[23:42] public comment portion of the meeting.
If you'd like to speak, please step
[23:45] forward. State your name.
>> Good afternoon again. Chris Mullen,
[23:48] Dorcast County Collector of Revenue. For
the record, uh last week, as many of you
[23:53] heard, we had our annual tax sale was
required by chapter 140 of the revised
[23:58] statutes of Missouri. We offered 25
properties. We sold uh 23 of them were
[24:05] first offerings. One was a second
offering, one was a third offering. We
[24:09] sold 21 of those. Cass County Land
Trustee David Coughfeld took one. Three
[24:16] parcels weren't sold at all. So, they'll
be offered again next year. Uh we
[24:21] cleaned up $64,98.33
[24:25] of back taxes and interest, and we're
going to deposit with Mr. Chz a whopping
[24:31] $860,419
of surplus.
[24:36] So,
um, our total proceeds for the day is
[24:40] $928,80.50.
[24:43] I think it was a successful sale and I
think it makes sense now to bring it
[24:46] into the second floor. And I'm looking
forward to the new acoustics and sound
[24:50] system for that room, make it a little
bit easier. Uh, on my website at
[24:54] castount.com, you can see the full
report if you're interested in any of
[24:57] the biders, interested in any individual
parcel or any taxpayer uh, that have a
[25:03] leaning placed on their home. So, we did
have a good sale. We will return uh
[25:08] again the fourth Monday of August next
year in the second floor courtroom. Uh I
[25:14] would like to end this in public record,
too. I'll leave this when we're done.
[25:17] Second item from my office. We're we're
32 days in a brand new computer system.
[25:22] Uh we've had some good days, we've had
some bad days. I'm dragging us into 2026
[25:28] one way or the other. Um the AS400 is
still running. We're leaving it running
[25:33] for now. so we can get the tax return
filed for the state in March 205 just to
[25:37] make [clears throat] sure. But we're
we're balancing right now. Uh we have an
[25:42] AI function in the search bar. Some
folks are calling about that. It's
[25:46] getting faster [snorts] the more we use
it. Um it has been a major investment
[25:50] and it is a major change of how we
operate. So taxpayers by and large have
[25:55] been somewhat relatively understanding.
Um, and frankly, the payment uh on my
[26:00] website is faster and now that receipt
is instantaneous,
[26:05] so we're going to saving dramatic sums
of money in postage and and paper. So,
[26:10] we're uh refining that. We're with
programmers again today. We had
[26:14] programmer on site yesterday. We're
trying to work through all the bugs.
[26:18] We're taking every complaint seriously.
I'm trying to make this as, you know,
[26:23] friendly, computer friendly. We want
this to be a a good experience for
[26:27] folks. Mainly a fast experience because
nobody likes to pay property taxes. So,
[26:31] um, if you all hear anything, have any
input, please let [clears throat] me
[26:34] know. We're taking that input to the
programmers. We have a daily email. Here
[26:39] were the issues. Here's what was
resolved. Here's unresolved. Here are
[26:43] the new issues. And so, they're on site.
They're physically on site about every
[26:47] other day. And I'm working uh with the
lead developer remotely today on on a
[26:51] couple of issues. So we are um we we
went from 1990 to 2026 like that. So
[27:00] there have been a few bumps but all in
all we're you know plugging plugging
[27:04] away and going forward.
>> Thank you Mr. Mullins. Appreciate that.
[27:08] Any other public comment at this time?
Seeing none we're going to close with
[27:13] public comment. Uh we are going to go in
executive session under RSMO 610.021.1
[27:19] legal. Uh, as soon as we come out, we
will adjourn the general meeting. So, I
[27:24] will need a motion to go into objective.
>> So, move.
[27:26] » I'll second that. Roll call, please.
Sarah.
[27:29] » Uh, Rob Houston.
>> Yes.
[27:31] » Mike Morland. Jeff Fletcher.
>> Yes.
[27:35] Thank you all.