1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:06,960
We got a team together. It's a little
after 5:15. Thanks you guys. Um, so

2
00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:10,960
let's go ahead and get going. Let's
begin with the pledge of Well, first of

3
00:00:08,639 --> 00:00:15,759
all, welcome to 2026. I guess we were a
little over a month ago when we last

4
00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:21,199
met. So, uh, few items to discuss
tonight. I hope everybody had great

5
00:00:17,359 --> 00:00:24,560
holidays and a happy new year. We plow
into it now, huh? See what it has in

6
00:00:23,279 --> 00:00:26,240
store for us.
>> Yes.

7
00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:31,279
» Uh, let's start with the pledge of
allegiance. Uh, would you mind leading

8
00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:31,279
us?

9
00:00:31,519 --> 00:00:39,840
Pledge algiance
algiance to the flag of the United

10
00:00:36,719 --> 00:00:46,559
States of America and to the republic
for which it stands. One nation under

11
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:52,280
God, indivisible with liberty and
justice for all.

12
00:00:48,879 --> 00:00:52,280
» Thank you, [clears throat] Jennifer.

13
00:00:52,879 --> 00:01:00,960
» Okay. Uh, we can start with the approval
of the minutes dated September or

14
00:00:58,239 --> 00:01:05,920
December 2nd, 2025.
>> I'll make a motion to approve the

15
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:10,320
minutes dated December 2nd, 2025.
>> I will second that motion.

16
00:01:08,320 --> 00:01:14,560
» Excellent. All in favor?
>> I

17
00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:18,960
» I motion carries. Uh, items two and
three are public hearing items. However,

18
00:01:18,159 --> 00:01:24,240
um, they're going to have to be
postponed. Is that right, Faith? to uh a

19
00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:29,200
little bit future. But is there anybody
here from the public that came

20
00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:34,159
specifically to address items two and
three,

21
00:01:31,119 --> 00:01:37,560
which is a general plan amendment and
zone change?

22
00:01:37,759 --> 00:01:44,000
If not, we do we need to have a public
hearing or if if nobody's here,

23
00:01:42,960 --> 00:01:46,320
» do we need to open it?
>> No, we just want to make sure

24
00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:54,320
everybody's they have a chance to talk.
>> All right. So, we won't open or close

25
00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:58,000
it. Um, and we'll move on to item four,
uh, public hearing. It's a zone change

26
00:01:56,320 --> 00:02:03,560
from,
uh, GC to R3M. Go civil.

27
00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:11,760
» Good evening, Dallas Buckner. Go Civil.
Um, this is, uh, we recently did another

28
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:16,160
zone change right across the street, and
I think I had mentioned that in this

29
00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:19,440
meeting. Um, but ironically when we sent
out the notice, someone from across the

30
00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:24,319
street said, "Hey, I want to do the same
thing." So, um, here we are. This is an

31
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:34,959
existing parcel that's zoned general
commercial. Um, and we're requesting a

32
00:02:28,879 --> 00:02:41,200
zone change to R3. Um the really the the
reason for this is just from a lending

33
00:02:36,879 --> 00:02:48,440
standpoint on an existing house and
trying to get a residential loan on

34
00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:48,440
something that's zoned commercial. So

35
00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:56,239
» any questions?
>> Seems pretty straightforward. Yep.

36
00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:59,440
» Yeah.
>> City have any problems with it or

37
00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:04,800
» No.
>> No. No issues.

38
00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:07,599
» It is a public hearing. So, let's go
ahead and open the public hearing. Is

39
00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:10,159
there anybody would like to speak to
this? Which

40
00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:13,840
» piece of property is again? Was it the
one that was highlighted?

41
00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:19,519
» If not, we'll turn the sign around and
close the public hearing and entertain a

42
00:03:16,959 --> 00:03:21,760
motion if anybody would like to.
>> Oh, okay.

43
00:03:20,879 --> 00:03:28,480
» Anybody?
>> Okay. I'll make a motion

44
00:03:24,319 --> 00:03:35,760
» um to for the zone change from general
commercial to R3M at the property at 491

45
00:03:32,879 --> 00:03:38,319
North 400 West.
>> I'll second that.

46
00:03:36,879 --> 00:03:43,200
» Oh, sorry, Jennifer. You didn't say
whether it was a positive or negative.

47
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:46,840
» Oh, a positive recommendation.
>> Sorry about that.

48
00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:53,920
» Who seconded? Who seconded that? Steve
did. All right. Thank you. Um, all in

49
00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:57,959
favor?
>> I.

50
00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:57,959
» Any opposed?

51
00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:07,920
» All right. Thank you. Um, public hearing
is the next number five, development

52
00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:10,920
deferral agreement. Jesse,
>> welcome.

53
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:26,240
» Jesse Carter. I'm the owner of this
land here. Um, so essentially what we

54
00:04:22,079 --> 00:04:34,080
are looking to do is build
small single family homes on this

55
00:04:29,040 --> 00:04:39,120
portion with a twin home right here. Um,
so with the from what I understand the

56
00:04:35,919 --> 00:04:47,440
new city ordinance, I can't remember how
many feet within a development you have

57
00:04:41,759 --> 00:04:54,160
to finish the dedicated road. Um, and so
the in talking with Kent,

58
00:04:50,720 --> 00:05:04,160
um, the city would want us to
either now or in the future finish this

59
00:04:58,639 --> 00:05:10,639
portion of Center Street. Um, so what we
are wanting to do, all of these homes

60
00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:16,800
front 25 North. Um, so there's really
not a huge need for finishing this,

61
00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:21,520
finishing this road currently. Um, from
what I understand, this road will

62
00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:25,039
eventually go all the way to West View.
So,

63
00:05:23,039 --> 00:05:30,639
eventually this will be a pretty heavily
traveled road. And we're not saying that

64
00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:36,720
we don't want to finish it eventually,
but I don't know how many people have

65
00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:43,600
driven it, but there's really no one
hardly ever driving it. So right now um

66
00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:48,880
in this phase just this little 1 acre
portion here we're just wanting to defer

67
00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:52,240
that to a later phase.
>> Help me understand where that is kind of

68
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:57,280
in reference to other places.
>> Is it out by Iron West?

69
00:05:54,160 --> 00:06:03,600
» So Iron Springs Elementary is here and
then this is Mountain Shadows and Iron

70
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:08,919
West is right here. So these are those
new Iron Hawk town homes here.

71
00:06:09,840 --> 00:06:15,199
So,
>> yeah. And this is the new where we're

72
00:06:13,199 --> 00:06:20,319
putting in the new soccer fields right
down in here. Just one point of

73
00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:24,080
clarification if I could, Jesse. What I
saw on

74
00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:28,639
really we didn't give much of a
submittal on this, but what we did get

75
00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:34,400
just said to defer improvements west of
4200 West. our understanding of what you

76
00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:37,919
were
um let me get make sure you get the

77
00:06:35,919 --> 00:06:41,840
right map here. What you were wanting to
defer because what we were saying is

78
00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:47,840
this is all one parcel. You're
developing a portion of that parcel. Um

79
00:06:44,479 --> 00:06:52,240
you own both sides of the road. Um our
interpretation of our ordinance is that

80
00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:59,039
you need to fully improve Center Street
for that entire length um from Mountain

81
00:06:55,280 --> 00:07:04,000
Shadows over to Iron Hawk. And we had
understood that it was just this portion

82
00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:09,840
west of 4200 West that you were um
saying that you wanted to defer

83
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:15,120
um based on what you submitted and and
kind of based on our conversations

84
00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:18,160
earlier. So are you it sounded like you
were saying something different in your

85
00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:23,120
presentation though.
>> Um no I think that's that's actually

86
00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:27,440
what we're trying to do from what I
understand. You're also needing us to

87
00:07:25,199 --> 00:07:28,800
finish this water line right here.
Correct. And so,

88
00:07:28,479 --> 00:07:33,919
» yeah,
>> from the conversations that

89
00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:39,199
» I am aware of, it doesn't make a whole
lot of sense to not knowing that we need

90
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:46,240
to do that waterline, we may as well
finish this portion of Center Street and

91
00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:52,560
then um you don't happen to have
in red or where exactly

92
00:07:50,319 --> 00:07:59,759
how much of this we are trying to defer,
right? So my my understanding of this

93
00:07:55,599 --> 00:08:04,960
was that um basically over through the
intersection you would be building the

94
00:08:02,479 --> 00:08:09,120
the full width improvement and then you
just taper down to the existing and this

95
00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:11,919
portion here is what you wanted to defer
until you develop the south side. That

96
00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:14,479
was what I had
>> understood

97
00:08:12,960 --> 00:08:19,520
» which some of that is we don't know
exactly where these well likely the road

98
00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:23,599
would come in and meet with this
intersection and probably this

99
00:08:21,199 --> 00:08:26,400
intersection but we don't know exactly
how this is all going to play out here

100
00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:31,440
and so
>> we don't want to build a road that we

101
00:08:28,639 --> 00:08:35,839
are then going to have to
>> tear up.

102
00:08:32,479 --> 00:08:41,760
» Yeah, understood. Yeah,
>> especially knowing that this is not

103
00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:44,560
really a heavily traveled road quite yet
till it

104
00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:48,320
» Yeah, it's getting more and more so with
the with the school and church over

105
00:08:46,560 --> 00:08:51,839
there and lots of people now in Iron
West. It's getting more and more all the

106
00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:56,880
time. But but yeah,
>> is the right side of this road developed

107
00:08:54,160 --> 00:09:01,440
there where the the existing homes are?
Is that developed? Yeah. So the the

108
00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:07,519
north side of the road is developed to
here and of course down all all this

109
00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:10,160
along here is fully developed. Um
>> so it's the

110
00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:16,320
» and it's fully developed on the south
side here. So it's it they would be

111
00:09:13,279 --> 00:09:20,800
already required to do you know of
course their frontage and they'll

112
00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:26,160
dedicate the the ride of way. Um, but
our ordinance allow requires them to do

113
00:09:23,600 --> 00:09:30,880
the other side as well since they own it
and so it would really require the whole

114
00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:34,800
thing. They're asking to defer that
western portion

115
00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:37,760
» right until
>> so I'm not quite understanding they're

116
00:09:36,399 --> 00:09:40,959
they have to do the whole thing but
they're asking for a referral a

117
00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:45,440
deferral. That doesn't make sense to me.
>> So the requirement there would be

118
00:09:43,519 --> 00:09:48,959
nothing to defer if it were not a
requirement. Right. So, our

119
00:09:47,279 --> 00:09:54,320
interpretation of the ordinance is that
their requirement is to build the of

120
00:09:52,399 --> 00:09:58,720
course they'll be building the full
roadway

121
00:09:56,000 --> 00:10:03,680
um where it's not developed on either
side, but then they they do have to

122
00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:05,519
improve that southside as well. That's
also their frontage,

123
00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:11,839
» right?
>> That's part of this parcel that they're

124
00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:16,640
developing. and um the uh um but yeah,
so they're they're they're not um

125
00:10:14,720 --> 00:10:22,079
arguing whether they're responsible for
that. They're saying that they think

126
00:10:18,320 --> 00:10:25,760
this western portion would uh be better
done at a later time when they develop

127
00:10:24,079 --> 00:10:28,720
that south side of the road.
>> I see.

128
00:10:26,399 --> 00:10:32,800
» So the north side they're going to when
they subdivide for how many lots you're

129
00:10:30,959 --> 00:10:38,800
going to have, you're going to develop
the north side of of Center Street. So

130
00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:44,480
the north side is already finished. It's
just this south portion.

131
00:10:40,959 --> 00:10:46,000
» Well, little portion that one acre, two
acre, whatever it is.

132
00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:49,680
» Oh, right.
>> Right there. You're going to finish one

133
00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:54,880
side of that,
>> right? Yep. We will. So, this is a It'll

134
00:10:52,560 --> 00:10:59,360
be a PUD. And so, we're actually
required to have a fence, I believe, 10

135
00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:03,279
feet off of
>> Yeah.

136
00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:07,760
» um off of the sidewalk,
>> which we did want to present. We're not

137
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:15,120
sure if if this is the correct meeting
to do so or not, but we wanted to see if

138
00:11:10,720 --> 00:11:22,399
we could instead of the full 10 feet um
do like a six foot wall off of that

139
00:11:19,242 --> 00:11:27,440
[clears throat] um sidewalk so that
these backyards could be a little bit

140
00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:34,160
deeper. Um, it's going to be a pretty
drastic

141
00:11:30,240 --> 00:11:38,399
amount because these homes here, their
back wall goes all the way to the

142
00:11:35,760 --> 00:11:46,320
sidewalk. So, then it's going to jump up
10 ft. And so, we wanted to tailor that

143
00:11:42,320 --> 00:11:51,519
down to six um for the drainage swell
that we're going to be doing here in the

144
00:11:47,519 --> 00:11:54,640
back. And then also some landscaping.
What is the structure on the walls and

145
00:11:53,680 --> 00:12:02,160
stuff
>> on the as I like your your left side

146
00:11:58,880 --> 00:12:05,600
those homes right there? What is the
>> is the wall against the center?

147
00:12:03,519 --> 00:12:07,440
» These actually front center street. I'm
not really sure.

148
00:12:06,639 --> 00:12:12,079
» Okay.
>> How that happened? Because you're not

149
00:12:08,959 --> 00:12:17,360
supposed to front a major collector road
like this. But these ones back up to it.

150
00:12:15,519 --> 00:12:20,959
So they're double frontage with the
front being here,

151
00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:23,600
» but their back wall is tight with
>> So yours are going to back up to it

152
00:12:22,720 --> 00:12:27,279
also.
>> They'll back up. So they'll come off of

153
00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:29,920
25 north and then we'll just have our
fence here.

154
00:12:28,560 --> 00:12:32,240
» So if I could just point out some
differences, right? Because we've had

155
00:12:30,959 --> 00:12:35,920
this come to the board of adjustments
before as well.

156
00:12:33,680 --> 00:12:40,399
» Um PUDS have a slightly different
requirement for where fencing has to go.

157
00:12:38,160 --> 00:12:43,760
» So we push them 10 ft off.
>> Um those other ones right there are not

158
00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:46,800
PUDS. They're standard subdivision if I
understand it correctly. So that's why

159
00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:51,279
there's a difference.
>> Um there are advantages to going with

160
00:12:48,720 --> 00:12:55,680
the PUB usually density advantages
>> and so in many cases it's a trade-off.

161
00:12:53,600 --> 00:12:58,480
» You get some advantages by having PUB
density and other things maybe you don't

162
00:12:57,120 --> 00:13:03,040
have to put in that you would for normal
ones. Um but this is one of the

163
00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:05,839
downsides. So typically at least board
of adjustments we've tried to keep those

164
00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:08,000
together. If you're going to get the
advantages of the PUD you're probably

165
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:11,200
going to have to deal with the
detriments too.

166
00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:14,800
» Um you don't get the best of both worlds
is kind of how we've taken it. The other

167
00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:20,240
real legal side of this that I struggle
with is this isn't in the application.

168
00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:24,079
Um, we were aware of it because Mike
told me that, but it's in the

169
00:13:22,560 --> 00:13:26,314
application. You guys saw it. It's one
sentence.

170
00:13:24,639 --> 00:13:29,440
» I don't think we can address it. To
[clears throat] Randle's point, we would

171
00:13:27,519 --> 00:13:32,560
have to notice it correctly and write a
summary to to address the fence tonight.

172
00:13:31,920 --> 00:13:36,079
» Okay.
>> So, I'm wondering if that is something

173
00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:40,000
maybe we can encourage from your end if
you want both of these because this is I

174
00:13:38,320 --> 00:13:43,519
would prefer both these issues be in the
same agreement if you're going to do it

175
00:13:41,279 --> 00:13:47,920
because annoying when we have to do two
for the same property. Um, it might be

176
00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:52,880
worth tableabling it and have you guys
propose some better language and even

177
00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:57,519
maybe sit down with Don or me to
actually put it into an agreement. Um,

178
00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:59,920
our temp fence goes or the
>> well,

179
00:13:58,639 --> 00:14:02,880
» all of it to make sure we're clear
because you even talked about waterline

180
00:14:01,519 --> 00:14:07,040
and you tried to point out different
areas. It might be best to have that

181
00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:11,360
flushed out a little better. Um, so that
we're all on the same page cuz you came

182
00:14:09,199 --> 00:14:14,720
in on a different page than Mike was and
Mike came in on a different page than

183
00:14:12,959 --> 00:14:18,240
what we all expected initially. So, I
mean, it's

184
00:14:15,680 --> 00:14:21,920
» I have a question for Kent. Center
Street, will that be a major feeder

185
00:14:21,199 --> 00:14:24,720
road?
>> Yes.

186
00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:27,279
» Going east and west. How far west is
that road going to eventually? Will it

187
00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:31,839
go?
>> It'll go It'll go all the way to 5700.

188
00:14:29,839 --> 00:14:35,839
As far as our property goes through,
>> it'll go clear down to who knows where.

189
00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:37,760
» Yeah, it's going to be major and it's
going to be one of the main paths to get

190
00:14:37,040 --> 00:14:39,839
up to the school.
>> Key drive is going to go right into

191
00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,240
Quap,
>> right? Oh, that'll be [laughter] good.

192
00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:46,320
» So, so
>> I'll I'll build a car wash out there.

193
00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:50,720
» So, here's where we're talking about
right now is this area here. But yes,

194
00:14:48,320 --> 00:14:56,959
Center Street would continue all the way
to 5700 West that goes down to the

195
00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:59,120
interchange at at uh all of a sudden I
forgot the name.

196
00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:04,320
» So, I have a question. When you get a
deferral, what's the trigger? What's the

197
00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:08,560
trigger for your obligation to actually
fulfill

198
00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:13,279
those things? Is it when the homes are
built? Is it after they're built? Is it

199
00:15:10,639 --> 00:15:18,720
when they're built? What's the trigger?
>> I think that's what uh why it would

200
00:15:16,399 --> 00:15:21,600
behoove us to bring back some details
for you. I think it that's a perfect

201
00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:24,240
question.
>> Yeah. So, without the

202
00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:29,440
» I'm sure Jesse has something in mind.
without a a development agreement to

203
00:15:26,720 --> 00:15:34,000
defer some of those improvements, it
would be that they have to have they

204
00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:38,959
have to at least be bonded for all of it
before we would even record the plat.

205
00:15:36,480 --> 00:15:42,880
Um, and then those improvements would
all have to be completed before they

206
00:15:40,480 --> 00:15:48,399
could get certificate of occupancy on
any of those units. So they're wanting

207
00:15:45,279 --> 00:15:52,480
to defer to where the part to the west
of 4200 West would have a different

208
00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:55,839
trigger that would come when they
develop the south side of the property.

209
00:15:54,240 --> 00:15:59,759
At least that's the way we understand it
and that's what as Randall was talking

210
00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:02,560
really needs to be spelled out in the
agreement.

211
00:16:00,720 --> 00:16:06,240
» Yeah.
So I I mean I'm happy to sit down you

212
00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:09,040
and Mike and whoever else from Plat and
Plat who wants to come in to work

213
00:16:08,079 --> 00:16:12,959
through those because those are that
that trigger question is an absolute

214
00:16:10,959 --> 00:16:17,279
must because the documents are drafted
that way to say what's the trigger to

215
00:16:14,880 --> 00:16:21,120
kick ahead deferred a deferred
improvement in.

216
00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:24,399
» Um the fencing one he told me that you
guys wanted to set it back a little but

217
00:16:22,639 --> 00:16:27,440
not the full 10. I don't know what a
little means. So that would be good to

218
00:16:25,839 --> 00:16:30,639
have spelled out as well.
>> Okay. Um because at this point I don't

219
00:16:29,040 --> 00:16:32,639
know what they would be giving a thumbs
up to.

220
00:16:31,519 --> 00:16:35,759
» It picks [snorts] it up.
>> Not everything you want that at least I

221
00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:38,720
know.
>> Yeah.

222
00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:42,320
» I wasn't aware that we weren't talking
about the fence today. So

223
00:16:40,399 --> 00:16:45,839
» yeah, I was surprised too when we sat
down for the meeting we had as staff. I

224
00:16:43,839 --> 00:16:46,800
was like where is the fence? [laughter]
>> Yep.

225
00:16:46,240 --> 00:16:50,240
» It's not there.
>> That's the entirety of what we've

226
00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:54,320
submitted. So, and that's the
unfortunate sometimes we when we do full

227
00:16:52,560 --> 00:16:58,000
subdivisions, we make them submit tons
of stuff. And this one we don't really

228
00:16:56,240 --> 00:17:01,600
have flushed out exactly what's required
for submitt. So, sometimes we get a

229
00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:06,240
napkin and that's kind of what this was.
It's a napkin. Not even a napkin

230
00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:11,679
drawing, just a napkin. Um, so that
would be my suggestion is you table it,

231
00:17:08,400 --> 00:17:15,039
allow us to get a more full submitt so
that you can come here with everything

232
00:17:13,439 --> 00:17:17,360
you want, not have to come back three
months from now because you didn't get

233
00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:20,559
something you wanted.
>> Yeah. I mean, I don't make any

234
00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:23,439
guarantees they give a faucet or the
council approves it, but it's going to

235
00:17:21,679 --> 00:17:26,160
be a waste of your time if you
>> Right. And as far as the water line,

236
00:17:25,039 --> 00:17:29,679
that was just something in the
construction drawings that we're working

237
00:17:28,240 --> 00:17:31,280
through. It wasn't any type of a
deferral or

238
00:17:30,400 --> 00:17:35,440
» Right. No. And that's
>> really didn't even need to be mentioned

239
00:17:32,559 --> 00:17:39,760
here other than the fact that that's why
we're only asking for a deferral on half

240
00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:41,840
of it because it
>> just makes sense.

241
00:17:40,640 --> 00:17:45,039
» No, it makes sense. But [clears throat]
it just be helpful to have all that in

242
00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:48,039
place.
>> Okay.

243
00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:56,960
I'm already deaf.
>> Yes. If if the if the planning

244
00:17:55,520 --> 00:17:59,679
commission wishes because this was
published correctly, right?

245
00:17:58,480 --> 00:18:03,520
» But not the fence.
>> But not Oh, yeah. The fence is not. So,

246
00:18:01,679 --> 00:18:04,960
the fence would require us to republish
it.

247
00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:06,320
» For how long?
>> Um,

248
00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:08,400
» 10 days.
>> 10 days.

249
00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:10,160
» Please state your name into the
microphone.

250
00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:13,440
» Sorry about that. [laughter]
>> Okay.

251
00:18:11,039 --> 00:18:17,039
» So, yeah, it it is possible. Can we do
it that quickly for the next meeting?

252
00:18:14,720 --> 00:18:21,840
» So, we would have to have
We'd have to have the notices and this

253
00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:26,720
discussion and the summaries ready by
Friday to get it out the door.

254
00:18:24,240 --> 00:18:30,400
» I think that gives us 10 days, right?
>> So, I'm hearing just somebody from your

255
00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:33,840
guys' office bring in Jesse, too, to
make sure we're getting everything

256
00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:37,200
you're expecting and sit down in time to
be able to get that to them because,

257
00:18:35,679 --> 00:18:41,200
yeah, state law now requires when we do
public notices to give a summary of what

258
00:18:38,960 --> 00:18:46,320
we're doing. And so, we can't just do
only a oneliner vague sentence. We have

259
00:18:43,360 --> 00:18:50,320
to have the details to summarize it. Um,
but yeah, I'm here this the rest this

260
00:18:47,919 --> 00:18:52,960
week. So,
>> perfect.

261
00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:56,480
» Thank you.
>> All right. Well,

262
00:18:53,919 --> 00:19:01,440
» okay. I'll make a motion that we table
this

263
00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:03,760
until the January 20th meeting.
>> There is a public hearing part of it, so

264
00:19:03,120 --> 00:19:06,640
we may need to
>> Yes. I was going to ask, do we need to

265
00:19:05,120 --> 00:19:10,320
do that? Is anybody here to speak to
this? We'll open the public hearing.

266
00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:12,799
» Oh, just kidding.
>> Close it.

267
00:19:11,120 --> 00:19:15,600
» Now, we can go back on your mark. Hey,
I'm just trying to move things along

268
00:19:14,320 --> 00:19:21,328
with people. Doing well.
>> So, I'm doing my very best here on the

269
00:19:18,799 --> 00:19:25,520
limited brain cells that I have left.
[laughter]

270
00:19:22,080 --> 00:19:30,000
» Ah, and sleep. Limited sleep. Um, so
I'll make a positive re or a

271
00:19:27,280 --> 00:19:36,720
recommendation that we table this item
until um our next commission meeting,

272
00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:42,080
January 20th, 2026.
>> I will second that.

273
00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:46,160
» A motion and a second. All in favor? I
>> I'll warn you, we if they don't get it

274
00:19:43,919 --> 00:19:47,360
to us soon enough, we may push it for
another meeting.

275
00:19:47,120 --> 00:19:49,200
» Yeah,
>> if as long as you're okay with that,

276
00:19:48,480 --> 00:19:52,960
» that's on them.
>> We are totally fine.

277
00:19:50,559 --> 00:19:57,120
» Correct.
>> Thank you, Jennifer and others. Um,

278
00:19:54,960 --> 00:20:00,880
okay. Uh, item number six,
transportation master plan amendment,

279
00:19:59,360 --> 00:20:03,280
velocity builders.
>> I don't think so.

280
00:20:03,248 --> 00:20:06,720
[clears throat]
>> You're going to do that? I'm I'm going

281
00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:14,559
to go ahead and speak to this and let me
jump over to that on our uh master plan.

282
00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:20,559
What we're looking at on this we have in
our street master plan uh you know this

283
00:20:17,600 --> 00:20:26,000
is where the terribles is now second
east right loves out by the north

284
00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:32,400
interchange. We have on our master plan
this minor collector roadway running

285
00:20:29,039 --> 00:20:40,880
between Canyon Ranch Drive and uh
Wedgewood Lane here. Um as this issue

286
00:20:37,039 --> 00:20:46,559
has been pursued with UD do get their
approval to be able to connect the road

287
00:20:43,520 --> 00:20:53,200
to Main Street to State Highway 130
right there. um they have uh considered

288
00:20:49,440 --> 00:21:00,000
it and and denied the request to have
that new connection to to State Route

289
00:20:56,720 --> 00:21:05,360
130. And so with that being being the
case, it doesn't make any sense for us

290
00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:09,840
to have that on our master plan. um the
master planned road there. Having that

291
00:21:07,760 --> 00:21:14,960
on our plan kind of creates an
encumbrance there that really can't be

292
00:21:12,159 --> 00:21:22,159
fulfilled because they uh they can't
build the intersection onto SR130. So

293
00:21:18,320 --> 00:21:28,799
what Velocity had requested um and
what's your item six on your agenda is

294
00:21:25,200 --> 00:21:33,600
vacating this portion here. Um, and they
only requested that because that's the

295
00:21:30,720 --> 00:21:38,159
side of the road that they that they uh
where they own property and would be the

296
00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:42,960
ones affected. We looked at that and
said while we're doing that, let's go

297
00:21:39,919 --> 00:21:48,000
ahead and address both sides. Um, and so
that's item seven is for this other

298
00:21:45,679 --> 00:21:56,880
side, but it's really all the same thing
for both of those um uh those two items.

299
00:21:52,640 --> 00:22:01,520
So, and uh um Tyler Meling with Velocity
would have been here tonight. Uh he had

300
00:21:59,520 --> 00:22:05,600
a conflict. He called talked to me. I
told him, "Don't worry about it. I'll

301
00:22:03,360 --> 00:22:09,600
I'll cover both sides of Main Street in
in in my discussion." So, that's why

302
00:22:07,760 --> 00:22:15,000
he's not here if you're wondering on
that. [clears throat]

303
00:22:10,960 --> 00:22:15,000
Any questions for me?

304
00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:19,280
» It's pretty straightforward. So,
basically what you're saying is that

305
00:22:18,159 --> 00:22:22,640
cannot happen.
>> It can't happen. Yeah. So, let's get it

306
00:22:21,120 --> 00:22:25,200
off the map. get rid of that
encumbrance.

307
00:22:23,679 --> 00:22:26,480
» I think that's do.
>> Thank you. [clears throat] Any

308
00:22:25,919 --> 00:22:29,840
questions?
>> Is it just too close to that other

309
00:22:29,120 --> 00:22:34,480
» um
>> Yeah, but between this intersection and

310
00:22:32,640 --> 00:22:40,640
that intersection, there's not enough
space to to meet their access spacing

311
00:22:37,919 --> 00:22:45,280
requirement. The other concern they had
in in considering whether they could,

312
00:22:43,679 --> 00:22:48,720
you know, make an exception on the
distance is especially being on the

313
00:22:47,360 --> 00:22:54,080
inside of that curve, they're really
worried about the sight distance there.

314
00:22:51,360 --> 00:22:58,080
And so that was uh but we we had a lot
of discussion with them. At one point it

315
00:22:55,919 --> 00:23:03,120
looked like we might get there and then
uh as they kind of ran it up through

316
00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:08,320
their leadership. Uh it was they came
back and said we we can't do it. We're

317
00:23:05,039 --> 00:23:14,000
not going to approve that.
>> You have a stop light at Canyon Center

318
00:23:10,720 --> 00:23:17,280
Drive and a stop light at the Canyon
Ranch Drive.

319
00:23:15,120 --> 00:23:21,760
» So there's there's a there is a traffic
signal here. There's not one here yet.

320
00:23:19,840 --> 00:23:23,600
There is at Nichols Canyon right down
here.

321
00:23:22,559 --> 00:23:27,919
» Um this is
>> plans for a stoplight there.

322
00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:34,159
» Um there's there is will potentially be
a stoplight there. Yes. In our um

323
00:23:31,120 --> 00:23:39,919
agreement with UD do where it's laid out
what intersections would be candidates

324
00:23:36,400 --> 00:23:44,559
for a stop uh for a s traffic signal if
it's justified by the traffic volumes.

325
00:23:42,640 --> 00:23:50,320
this is one that's on the list that it
that they have already agreed could be

326
00:23:47,039 --> 00:23:55,039
allowed um you know with the windco
that's proposed here and and other

327
00:23:52,960 --> 00:23:59,760
development in the area with there's a
traffic study that's about to happen

328
00:23:57,120 --> 00:24:04,240
that will look at that and I I I think
we're pretty sure that that traffic

329
00:24:01,280 --> 00:24:07,440
study is going to project enough traffic
utilizing this for all of this

330
00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:13,320
development that it will end up
justifying it. So, we're anticipating

331
00:24:09,280 --> 00:24:13,320
that there will be one there.

332
00:24:13,461 --> 00:24:15,481
[clears throat]

333
00:24:16,559 --> 00:24:21,760
» Thank you, Ken.
>> Yes. I'll open the public hearing for

334
00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:24,320
six and seven. I think we can do those
together given that.

335
00:24:23,279 --> 00:24:28,640
» Yeah, these are together.
>> Say your name. N name.

336
00:24:25,520 --> 00:24:34,400
» Dan Roberts and thanks Dan. JMT owns the
property on the east side of Main

337
00:24:30,480 --> 00:24:42,000
Street. We asked DOT to let us have a
right turn in and a right turn out. and

338
00:24:37,679 --> 00:24:47,919
we were just flat told no, okay, by DOT.
So, we were trying to eliminate all the

339
00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:54,320
congestion that is going to take place
up there on the Terribles intersection,

340
00:24:50,559 --> 00:25:00,640
but uh DOT can they control all that,
you know, back to that intersection. So,

341
00:24:57,039 --> 00:25:03,279
anyway, so we're okay vacating it. Uh
and that's item number seven.

342
00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:08,640
» Thanks.
>> Wow, easy.

343
00:25:05,760 --> 00:25:08,640
» Thank you.

344
00:25:09,120 --> 00:25:15,360
all the extra land.
>> Any other comments?

345
00:25:13,360 --> 00:25:18,400
» If not, we'll close the public hearing
and

346
00:25:16,960 --> 00:25:21,400
be willing to entertain a
recommendation.

347
00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:27,840
» You go. You go. I can.
>> Okay. I'll make a positive

348
00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:33,679
recommendation
on 2500 North Main Street

349
00:25:31,279 --> 00:25:40,799
that the transportation master plan be
amended to eliminate the previously

350
00:25:37,440 --> 00:25:43,360
proposed road.
>> Thank you.

351
00:25:41,840 --> 00:25:49,120
» I'll second
>> motion in a second. All in favor? I

352
00:25:47,279 --> 00:25:55,559
» Thank you.
All right. Ordinance text amendment.

353
00:25:52,080 --> 00:25:55,559
Amber Ray.

354
00:26:01,039 --> 00:26:11,760
» All right. Amber Ray planning. Um so
many moons ago there was the general

355
00:26:09,360 --> 00:26:16,480
commercial zone and that was rescended.
Um however, so it was rescended in our

356
00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:22,000
ordinance. However, there are still
areas of the city that are zoned general

357
00:26:19,120 --> 00:26:27,120
commercial. Um,
so if someone is in the general

358
00:26:25,120 --> 00:26:32,720
commercial and they want to develop,
they have to ask us where this general

359
00:26:29,520 --> 00:26:40,799
commercial zone is and we have to go and
dig out this dusty copy and give it to

360
00:26:36,320 --> 00:26:44,720
them. So um, the general commercial zone
is very similar to the central

361
00:26:42,799 --> 00:26:48,480
commercial zone. So, in an effort to
make the zoning specifications easily

362
00:26:46,960 --> 00:26:53,919
accessible to the public, we are
proposing a text amendment. Um, this is

363
00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:58,640
what it currently says in the ordinance
under the general commercial zone. And

364
00:26:56,640 --> 00:27:08,200
we would,
um, suggest removing what is red and

365
00:27:02,640 --> 00:27:08,200
crossed out and adding in what is green.

366
00:27:11,623 --> 00:27:16,799
» [laughter]
>> Will that make your life easier?

367
00:27:14,960 --> 00:27:22,159
» This would actually make my life easier
and I think it would actually be very

368
00:27:19,120 --> 00:27:24,960
clear and easy for the public instead of
this.

369
00:27:22,559 --> 00:27:28,640
» What will you do with that free time?
>> Well, [laughter] I don't know yet.

370
00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:31,679
» We have plenty of work for it. Don't
worry about that.

371
00:27:29,360 --> 00:27:35,120
» We got more band-aids Netflix. I don't
know. Just just so you know from the

372
00:27:33,520 --> 00:27:39,840
legal side, the reason why I'm in favor
of this um is we have no ability to

373
00:27:38,400 --> 00:27:44,240
change the general commercials
requirements right now because it's it's

374
00:27:42,080 --> 00:27:49,120
basically deleted ordinance. So it is
fixed and for over 10 years now we have

375
00:27:47,279 --> 00:27:52,880
not been able to change what's allowed
or not allowed in the general commercial

376
00:27:51,039 --> 00:27:57,600
zone. But we've been changing something
about every other zone during that time

377
00:27:54,480 --> 00:28:02,399
frame. This allows the council with your
recommendation of course to make changes

378
00:28:00,159 --> 00:28:06,799
if we don't like something whether
prohibitive or allowing in a general

379
00:28:04,320 --> 00:28:11,520
commercial zone without having to dust
off the old one and bring it back and

380
00:28:09,360 --> 00:28:15,200
figure out what 12 changes we've made in
between that we should make. This is

381
00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:19,039
just a simpler way to handle the same
situation.

382
00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:23,760
» Right.
>> Any [clears throat] other questions?

383
00:28:21,760 --> 00:28:27,279
If not, it's a public hearing. So, we'll
open the public hearing.

384
00:28:26,000 --> 00:28:32,000
» Carter Wilkey, I just have a quick
question. Um, so I guess in this

385
00:28:29,279 --> 00:28:35,360
situation then with this now people
there would be no need to change the

386
00:28:33,679 --> 00:28:38,559
zone then because a lot of times people
come in and reszone from general

387
00:28:36,799 --> 00:28:41,440
commercial to central commercial. They
could just leave it as general

388
00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:44,960
commercial and under
>> they could do that now, right?

389
00:28:42,960 --> 00:28:48,720
» But there's only just a what we what you
guys find like a dozen if even that

390
00:28:47,440 --> 00:28:52,080
differences.
>> There were like five uses.

391
00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:56,080
» Gotcha. that were different between the
two zones. Um, so most of the time they

392
00:28:54,799 --> 00:28:59,760
weren't changing the zone. They just
stuck with general commercial. It just

393
00:28:57,919 --> 00:29:02,320
took us a while to dust off the old
version.

394
00:29:00,480 --> 00:29:07,440
» Right.
>> Thank you, Carter.

395
00:29:04,880 --> 00:29:13,520
Any others like to speak to this? If
not, we'll close the public hearing and

396
00:29:09,840 --> 00:29:20,080
be willing to entertain a motion.
>> I'll get my glasses this time. Okay.

397
00:29:17,120 --> 00:29:27,279
I'll make a positive recommendation for
the ordinance text amendment pertaining

398
00:29:23,440 --> 00:29:30,720
to the repealed general commercial zone.
>> Seconded.

399
00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:32,960
» We have a recommendation positive
recommendation and a second. All in

400
00:29:32,399 --> 00:29:36,399
favor?
>> I.

401
00:29:33,520 --> 00:29:43,080
» Any opposed? No. [clears throat]
Looks like that concludes our start in

402
00:29:38,720 --> 00:29:43,080
the for 2026