Chair. It’s 9
o’clock.
>> Goodmorning has everyone
this morning. If you are
willing and able please rise
for the invocation and the
Pledge of Allegiance. Father
in heaven. We thank you for
the stay that you have blessed
us with. Thank you for those
that have come.
>> Here today, Lord to take
part and local government. I
pray that you give us all the
ability to reason have
discernment be kind gracious
one another. We ask for you to
walk with us throughout the
stay in Jesus name.
>> I pledge allegiance to the
flag of the United States of
America and to the Republic
for which it stands. One
nation under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for
all. Thank you. You may be
seated. Madam Clerk.
>> This is a special meeting
of Citrus County Board of
County commissioners on the
17th day of August 2026. and
attendance. Our chair Diana
Finnegan first Vice Chair
Janet Eric Second Vice Chair
Hart Commissioner Rebecca
Bay’s Commissioner Holly
Davis, County Administrator
Steve Howard and county
attorney to nice a dime
inland. Thank you very much.
>> Madam Attorney, just turn
this over to you. Thank you.
Madam Chair, one second,
please.
>> Sorry, I have to sign into
my computer because it’s gone
to sleep. Okay.
>> So good morning
commissioners. We are here
today for a special meeting.
The requested action is to
seek approval to initiate
litigation against Sic Lecanto
Sand LLC. We’re looking for a
motion and a vote to direct
staff to initiate that
litigation against Qantas and
also, although it’s not
printed, were also seeking
that you authorize the
chairman to sign any documents
that might be necessary. As we
institute that litigation. So
we’re here this morning as a
follow-up to your 11 August
11th meeting during which the
board directed us to stop what
is believed to be on permitted
activity out at. can’t just
stands parcels during the sand
land application hearing the
board received evidence and
testimony relating to ongoing
mining operations on a portion
of their property. And then
you also heard testimony and
evidence that there’s ongoing
debris falling in disposal on
one of their other parcels.
The Henley parcel that they
recently both all properties
currently have pending code
violation cases. And as the
board is aware, the board has
delegated your code.
Compliance matters to a
special master. Those
processes are in place
continuing through those
processes to and fruition.
With the special master
hearing. But because of the
exigent circumstances with the
continued, what what is
believed to be continued
mining and debris disposal. We
believe that’s why the board
came to the conclusion that
you wanted to seek the
injunction. Your decision. And
despite the cease and desist
notices that have been issued
through the code cases, we’ve
learned that the applicant
intends to continue
operations. We receive. We
scheduled this meeting to
receive direct direction from
you and approval to file
injunction. And although we
are just beginning to develop
the case because it’s been
very quick, we wanted to share
some important things with
you. So.
So although you might
not be able to see it because
it is small, this is the first
code compliance notice of
violation and clearly they say
it says that they’re to cease
all activities and provide
documentation and down here
too. Evidence establishing the
property has been in
continuous use for mining
activity since November of
2008. The second code
compliance case has similar
language in this is on the
Henley property, which is
that?
>> Can you put a mike Sorry? I
apologize. Think This is the
second notice of violation
that was issued and this is
for the Henry property, which
is next door to the original
property. And it clearly says
cease-and-desist on mining
activities and also cease any
debris. Acceptance. Madam
Attorney. Just want to clarify
But that’s the September 4th
2026. Bicep I think they have
provide evidence before
September 24th. That’s the
new. Activity. That’s the new
activity on Henley property.
So in other words, once there
cited, they have a period of
time to correct it right.
September 4th hasn’t happened
yet. Yes, ma’am. Okay. While
you are pursuing code
compliance cases, you can also
concurrently pursue actions in
circuit court. So you don’t
have to wait for those code.
Compliance matters to come to
fruition. With it. You can
stop This now code compliance
is a much different process
than what we when we go to
court. So I just brought up
this just a from your eyes,
you with, again, with the
properties, the properties
marked. To one 82 BN 3.30.
Those are the Henley
properties. The other
properties are the sand land
properties where it’s alleged
that they’re continuing
operations. What’s interesting
about this aerial is this is a
current aerial. I just took
this picture this morning and
added it and you can see that
on 0, 0, 0, 3, 4, 0, It
doesn’t look like there’s any
mining activity. And that’s
because the property
appraiser’s aerials are taken
as of, you know, that prior in time. If you look on
your your phone is your Google
Earth or any of those you’ll
see the activity that’s going
on there. Now. Now, this is a
video. That was shared to our
staff from Mister Corolla. And
it depicts aerials from 2010.
2013, 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021
2023. And if you could push
play.
So it seems pretty clear
from these aerials that there
had previously been mining.
But from looking at those, it
looks as though there’s there
was not any mining from at
least 2019 through 2023. and
where in 2026. And then
finally.
>> And one of the owners of
Florida filtered. If you
haven’t seen much of us to
this point, we’ve been mostly
just hosting what we have for
sale and too little promotions
here. And there. We have been
under attack recently from
officials there trying to shut
us down there. A lot of people
in Citrus County. Against us
and it’s not about growth.
This is a very personal
attack. But we are still open.
We are still operating. We’re
not the big Very small
business veteran knowns and
unknowns. And we Citrus
County. So we’re here to
support smart growth. With
their support housing for
hurricane evacuation route.
That’s what we do. So we
really appreciate your support
and just know we are open. We
are continuing to fight this
ands. We haven’t been loud up
until this point. We want you
to know our side and we want
you to know that we are still
here. We are still operating
and we really, really
appreciate your support. Thank
you so much for watching. Give
us a call. Let us know if you
need anything. But again,
we’re celebrating. We’re still
here. The punches keep coming
But we’re and ready to fight
back. Thank you so much. And
we’ll see you all soon.
>> That video was posted on
Friday. August 14th. So it
appears clear from from the
video and from things we’re
hearing in the community that
they do continue to operate
out there. And so the board
has a choice. The board can
either seek the injunctive
relief from the court or can
let the code compliance
process play out, which, as
you know, won’t happen at
least until September. The
date on that. so we’re here
today seeking direction from
the board on how you want us
to proceed on this case.
>> Any questions prepared to
make a motion. All I’d like to
open it to the public before
we visually comes after we
have motion a second. make a
motion the we direct the
county
>> To initiate litigation
against a Qantas and LLC to
enjoin continued unpermitted
activity.
>> And to direct a chair or
authorize the chair to sign
all necessary documents.
Second.
>> Okay. There’s a motion by
commissioner Canard and a
second by Commissioner Davis.
You know, it’s your time to
speak from the public. You’ll
have 3 minutes at the podium.
Please fill out a green card
located on that table. If are
requesting 5 minutes
representing a group, please
let the clerk know that you
have a letter and file have a
look at her. Her words gold.
If you have a letter, let us
know in commissioner Canard
will give you 5 minutes.
Please keep your comments.
Respectful, direct all
comments to meet the chair and
state your name and where you
live. For the record. Welcome.
Good morning. PJ off, hammer,
Citrus County. This is going
to be very quick. I was
heading to AM county library
meeting on Friday. And I came
assess a trail just because I
like to see what’s happening
in areas and was passed by no
fewer than 3 loaded trucks
with sand. And when I came to
Hoskins, there was still kind
of, you know, near from coming
down the sand road, which
leads me to believe that yes,
indeed, they are still very
much in business. And I just
thought you might like to know
that. Thank you. Thank you.
Next speaker, please.
>> Good Morning Commission.
Madam Chair Commissioners,
County attorney’s Office
County Administrator County
staff. My name is Kyle Van and
attorney with Bend
representing Lecanto sand. And
I just wanted to speak a
little bit to try and maybe
clarify some of the issues
this matter to hopefully try
and avoid some kind of
litigation and adverse
relationship. I have a have a
short presentation. I’m not
sure limited to the 5 minutes,
you know, as this is directed
against my client. But you
know, as you’ve seen the the
property is being mind. But I
think it’s. A little unclear
about what exactly the scope
of that mining is. And I just
wanted to to reference a few
things. Is there a computer
that I can plug into
presentation to?
>> I believe there’s not. You
only have 2 minutes left. So
okay.
>> So just to address the code
enforcement issue. They’re
there was a notice of
violation issued. code
enforcement actions are
governed by chapter one. 62 of
the Florida statutes that
requires before code
enforcement citation can
actually be issued, that there
has to be a notice of
violation and then a
reasonable amount of time for
the person being potentially
sighted to correct the
violations. So that’s why you
have a notice of violation
saying seesaw work by
September 4th or else you can
have a code enforcement action
or your injunction action. So.
They’re still there is still
mining on the property. And I
think at the hearing on last
Tuesday there was some
confusion about the code
enforcement Action code
compliance issues and the
rezoning and comprehensive
plan amendment. So the
northern essentially half of
the property is already zoned
for mining. It’s already got a
future land use of extractive
so mining can be done on those
properties as well as the
Henley properties on that. The
western side going north. All
that would be needed to do
that is a mining permit. So my
clients have applied for a
mining permit to do that. I
think there were discussions
between my client and county
staff prior to purchase it
prior to purchasing the
property. And after. Basically
where where staff could too.
My understanding is that she
indicated that there was
historical mining operations
on the property. There was a
non-conforming use. took that
as okay. We don’t need a
permit and that’s why they
started mining. So I think
there was maybe I’m
misunderstanding there.
Obviously a mining permit is
required. They have applied
for that. And my clients here
as well. Thank you. Thank you.
>> Next speaker, please. Good
morning. warning may need to
move that Mike I’m just going
to read Kuz so.
>> here because I want to
share my concerns. Trucks are
still coming in and out of the
old Henley property. I was
under the impression they were
told to stop operating. My
other concern is access to
look into sand through the old
Henley site. I have photos of
Genoa can’t share on my phone
that I took from the road of
them moving sand on la Qantas
and site. I don’t know what it
is for, but this proves that
they can access the Qantas and
by way of the old Kenley site,
he also closed the entrance to
a Qantas. And so you with a
berm. Could have been to close
up shop or to hide what’s
really going on there. We
can’t see it and I don’t trust
it. Neither should you. I
mean, the bottom line is they
are operating without a
permanent. They have admitted
to it and they have said
they’re going to keep doing
it. They don’t care what you
guys say. So I’m just asking
you to do what’s right. Thank
you for coming.
>> Oh, man. Madam Clerk, did
you get her name? Megan Horak,
thank you. Next speaker.
Please.
>> Good morning. Good morning,
ladies and gentlemen. My name
is Thomas Nunzio. I’ve been
living in this neighborhood
for over 35 years. Everytime
somebody new comes in. They.
I’ve been through this round
and round and round with the
sand mines. Nobody wants to do
the right thing. I have
pictures on my phone. I have
video of yesterday day before
the day before that. But
trucks on the road, they they
pull out of the mine. And then
they clean their tailgates off
on the road. They stop on the
road. We share. You have to go
around these trucks. Just to
get by. There’s a truck coming
the other way. You have to
wait. I mean, it’s just
ridiculous. They should be
doing that in the mine where
it doesn’t put all debris in
the road because it is a
shared wrote apparently they
don’t care. I got I got video
of debris coming in. I the
trucks that are there. There’s
got to be. 10 trucks. Many
will wish I had my own truck
almost 30 years. And I know
just about every one of those
many Willis, they’re all from
Tampa. Half of them don’t
speak English. They don’t care
about stop signs. They don’t
care if your granddaughter or
grandson is riding a horse
around the neighborhood, they
don’t care. They just
oblivious to everybody who
lives. Specter. It’s their
business. They’re going to do
what they’re going to do and to tell you the truth,
we’re really getting tired of.
These guys. They put up stop
signs by were Hoskins is and
they have to make a right on
cooler. They put 3 stop signs
up to its a 3 way. Stop. But I
swear I can sit there all day
long and I can bet you my
paycheck that none of them
will stop that. Those stop
signs they just run them and
go and they’re stopped in the
road. Both sides sometimes
talking to each other. They
won’t move. It’s just
ridiculous. It’s it’s if it’s
a share growth, they ought to
have a little consideration.
And they have not stopped
mining. They’re still mining
without a permit. I just want
to let you all know that.
That’s what’s going on back
there. So it’s just getting
way out of hand and the girls
that live next door to me,
they were riding their horses.
They got run off the road by
many Willard. It was coming up
the road, you know, week we’ve
used these roads for years to
ride our horses enjoyed life.
And they should have to go
through that. Their young
girls there, they just want to
ride their horses you know,
the traffic that’s in there is
unbelievable. The many willer
after many with tractor
trailer. She just ridiculous.
Just wish that That’s
something which saw Ort.
Somebody would just be a
better neighbor. You know, it
just seems to me like nobody
gives a c***. Tell you the
truth. It’s getting pretty
tired of it. Show. Thank Just
want to let you know what was
happening. I do have proof do
if you
>> Thank you for comments
next. Speaker.
>> Good morning. Commissioners
Chris Croll owner and Qantas
and mind. Thank you for
putting this together.
Honestly, if I was in your
position looking in, I
completely understand how this
would look. What I would say
is that we would like to have
the time to present to you.
Our evidence of working with
staff about the plan that was
in place for all of this. I
know we don’t have much time
right now, but we are we have
put everything together. We
look forward to presenting it
buyer due date, which was
presented by the violation.
And that’s all I want to say.
Thank you very much. Thank
you.
>> Next, speaker. Are you
coming up, Mister, a
>> commissioner Finnegan
Commissioner Davis, thank you
for meeting with myself and
some residents last weekend. I
look forward to our meeting
with Mister Steve Howard
tomorrow. Commissioner Davis
during our meeting, you told
us I’m paraphrasing, that has
direct comments to make for at
leadership. And I asked you
how how we can a can. Restore
trust. I want to talk about
why residents are losing
confidence in some of our
board. I don’t want to
distrust my commissioners,
quite frankly, a rather
believe that you have our
backs that you’re watching out
for us. I want to believe that
when a developer comes the it
has to do it. I just your
time. commissioner Davis says
Commissioner Davis, speaking
of doctor, Titus, General,
Open to the public or is it
supposed to be only about the
motion on the floor that
motion on the floor? Is this
about the same line?
>> Part of it to sustain name
for the record, sorry. erase
it just brings okay. So I want
to believe that when a
developer comes before with a
massive proposal, you first
question is is a project right
for Citrus County. But Pine
Ridge has made it difficult.
The sand mines made it
difficult county reporting 90
or 91 made it difficult.
That’s farm has made it
difficult. What about the data
center portagers for others?
So I want to ask a very simple
question who comes first in
this county, the developers of
the community, because based
on what I’ve seen, I’m
concerned that too often the
answer appears to be the
developer. Let me be clear.
I’m not against development.
I’m I’ve said that publicly
and not anti-growth. And I
don’t expect Citrus County to
stop growing. I understand all
of that. But I also believe
the people who already live
here have rights, one of the
right says to expect
development to happen.
According to the rules, this
county adopted to protect our
communities. That’s really
what this is about. Do we have
a local government? We can
trust to follow, protect and
enforce its own rules. Who is
protecting our land when it
came to the sand. Mine who is
making sure the permitting
requirements and rules are
being followed. What about
Tuscany Ranch? Residents had
questions about the request,
particularly after
Commissioner Basil counting
Rent County Road 4.91. and
that 3 million dollar state
funding request. Those events
matter because trust is
cumulative. And then we come
to Pine Ridge. The same 3
commissioners voted to approve
Pine Ridge application as the
court is no question that
approval. And the reason is
not insignificant. The judge
found that the board failed to
observe the essential
requirements of law. That’s
not a technical issue. That’s
a fundamental problem. I keep
coming back to one question.
Why did residents and pirates
have to take their own
government to court to get
this question answered? Think
about that. Residents had to
spend time and money
challenging a decision made by
the government. They elected
to present How can that not
affect our confidence? Because
people are watching. We’re
asking questions requesting
public records were paying
attention to vote. And we’re
comparing what we’re being
told with what we’re seeing
and we’re speaking out. And
then Pine Ridge comes along.
We are told rules matter.
We’re told facts matter. We’re
told the Comp Plan Matters.
Land Development, Code matter.
Zoning matters. So when
residency one controversial
project after another, and
then a court finds that some
of the board failed to observe
the essential role
requirements of law. People
are naturally going to start
connecting the dots. Truth
isn’t necessarily lost because
of one isolated incident.
Trust is lost and people are
being seeing a pattern. So I’m
asking you to make us believe
that you are putting Citrus
County first. That’s what
we’re asking for. Thank you.
for your comments
next speaker. Please. Anyone
else would like to come up and
speak before the board on the
A close open to the public.
Board. Any further comments.
Commissioner Barrick. Friday,
I was going from one meeting
down assess and I had to take
4.90.
>> And there were sand mine
dump trucks coming out onto
4.90, not one, not 2. And yes,
it was disruptive of the
traffic. And I was upset
because at our meeting we were
told they were not mining. And
to me, I was president just
Spring Civic Association and
we have deed restrictions and
we send out letters to our
attorney and what it should
cease and desist. It meant
seasoned ISIS from that day
until you got it fixed. Not
continue until whatever date
you feel like it or whatever
date you go back to court. So
when I see this come across
our desk again. I say we need
to approve the attorney to do
what you need to do and have
chair sign whatever papers are
needed because
>> when we say ceased and
desist, it means top right
now, not tomorrow or not. 6
weeks from now. Thank you.
>> They want I have a couple
questions just one speaker had
talked about legality of
following the correct
processes and this commission
can register before we have to
stop engaging in lawsuits.
What? I get there’s a time
difference of a couple of
weeks rates timber. 4th. I see
on this last paper. If they
follow that process, it goes
to the magistrate and then
there would be an order given
if we do this process with
that, the you handling it with
that? The U.S. hiring outside
counsel what’s the cost to the
taxpayers? In either
direction? And obviously it
would have to be an
approximate cost. I know I
would not hold to you ever to
a dollar amount. I just want
to know how lengthy is the
process both ways. So we could
say if. If the border
ex-Michigan I signed this
today, what does that do
differently and what’s the
cost of that? Then if we go
code enforcement, think that
much time are we saving? You
understand I’m saying? First
of all, we were going to
handle it within my office. I
think you all know I’m having
some health issues, but
together Valen I can.
>> Can get that done. So we
weren’t going to engage
outside counsel for this. The
county has a history of
pursuing some of these types
of actions in the past that
I’ve seen. it’s not unusual,
at least for the county to to
seek these types of actions
when it’s something, you
Important say some might think
egregious but also important
so we can handle that. The
costs involved would just be
the filing fees and meal if we
have to court reporters if we
have to do any kind of
investigative things, there
might be some some cost, but
the cost will be minimal
because we are keeping it in
house as far as timeline. It’s
hard to say how quickly we’re
going to be able to get to
court. I would say 6 months to
get some initial reaction from
the court. I’m not going say
that it’s going to be final
within 6 months, but hopefully
we can get a hearing on our request for temporary
relief. We be asking for
temporary and permanent
relief. So hopefully on the
temporary it could be
relatively short. But I can’t
stress the the weight
difference between an order
from the court and an order
from the special master. There
is a certain finality and
importance and weight given to
a circuit court a county court
decisions. So I think What we
find with our code compliance
cases is sometimes we see them
order entered and then it
becomes back and that comes
back. It. It’s not as final as a court decisions. So I in
quite interim, I question I
understand that one.
>> It is more powerful than
the other. But one is
September 4th. The other way
you’re seeing 6 months. I’m I
don’t want to I don’t want to
give you false expectations
and say it’s going to you
know, a month or 2 months.
It’s a soon as we can get on
the court’s calendar.
>> Hopefully. The respondent
will cease operations,
especially after today and
especially if you direct us to
file the suit because when it
comes to court, the judge
probably won’t look favorably
upon them continuing
operations after it’s been.
mean, there was ample evidence
that you’re hearing that they
shouldn’t be mining and the
September 4th date, I would
point out is on this second
partial the Henley, partial
the other date was June 27th.
I say. And so if perhaps if
you want to wait on the
vegetative debris and the
property from coming in from
the Henley property, if you
want to wait til September,
you can do that. But the
deadline for this other has
already passed. I say.
>> And so that deadline
passed, it went to the
magistrate.
>> know, their their
opportunity to cure past. It
says when does that case go to
the magistrate?
>> Wednesday to to stay. If
you’re going mass J C
Charlton, our director. Mr.
Charlton, we often don’t get
to see you at these. Nice to
see this morning.
>> Good morning or good
morning, Jace.
>> Our next hour here. And for
those cases be October, 21st.
And we’re going to the other
if the other ones go to that
hearing is will it also be
October 21st as well? We’re
going to have them all
together. Thank you. Any more
questions.
>> Yes, Commissioner Kerik has
a question patients to
magistrate this week. Is it
possible to get the one from?
June moved up to this week’s?
No, ma’am, OK, thank you.
Thank you. Anyone
else for Mr. I would hate to
spend a lot of tax, my
question just I don’t want to
spend a lot of taxpayer money
if the result is going to be
the same around the same time.
Does that make sense?
>> But you’re saying that
we’re not going to spend you
don’t see us spending a lot of
extra money for the result of
maybe coming at the same time.
I don’t see you spending a lot
as you turn I said you, you
May. You’re gonna have a
filing fee I’m sorry that I
don’t know what those are
these days. Maybe my assistant
might come rushing up to tell
me.
>> we all know how much,
Sally, flick.
>> Ali, remember, this was
Denise that right up here and
that may have to go the she’s
gonna was pretty okay. 400,
$400 for filing fee. And then
if there are any depositions,
court reporter, fees.
Ministerial Fi service fees.
You know, $40 here. I mean,
it’s not going to be. It’s not
like when we hire outside
counsel. Okay.
>> Thank you or to any other
comments or questions.
>> All those in favor signify
by saying Aye, aye, any
opposed motion carries 5, All
right. With that, this
meeting’s adjourned.
I’m
sorry. It’s on the agenda.
After the motion, there’s a
separate open to the public
after the
>> Microphone meeting back in
session.
>> My apologies and thank you
for that because I did open to
the public just for the item
and you would like to speak
about whatever you’d like to
speak about.
>> Come on open to the public
is now. Please forgive me.
>> Good morning. Commissioners
polled already 30 41 West
thing be street. You many
times before here. I’m
speaking on something today.
Not about what you have on
your agenda directly. Citrus
County benefit from an AI data
center. As controversial as an
AI data center seems to be. I
believe that one and only one
reasonable site exists in this
county. By examining what all
parties want. The finding a
solution that gets us there
without undue hysteria. The
county can satisfy all but the
most polarized elements. What
the people want. From numerous
comments at public meetings.
The great majority of the
people want any AI center to
be far away from them.
Complaints of noise light.
Does vibration unsightly mess
and proximity to an AI
disappear with distance?
Perceptions of future
expansion and its attendant
anxiety decreases well with
distance. What the purveyors I
want. Obviously great
long-term profits can be had
by those who own slash
control. I center. These
entity seemed to feel the time
is of the essence, do it now
before the bubble bursts. The
current nature of AI is huge.
Computational slash collating
power, coupled with the
seeming sorcery of algorithms.
The strain this imposes on
resources like electric power
generation, excessive heat
production requiring cooling
and vast land areas to
accommodate equipment and
buildings are prohibitive. In
most cases. Some projects come
with NBA’s that leave the
public. it ease? This is a
hard sell. What the county
needs to do. Find a balance
that quiets disagreement
between the parties that is
also beneficial to the entire
county. Proposal. Place all AI
development in the northwest
corner of the county on or
near the Duke Energy complex.
From the standpoint of
distance to populated areas
and availability of required
resources for AI data centers.
There is no better location.
The existing usage of the area
has created an industrial
complex in an environmentally
sensitive region for over 50
years with no great
dislocation to the county. The
Heat Island already exist. The
noise light, does that already
exist. The copious power and
water availability already
exist. Little of consequence
remains except negotiations
between the involved parties
slash factions on terms of
usage. The current generating
capacity as measured and you
go out. May I continue? OK?
Thank you. Thank you.
>> Next speaker, please.
>> We needed morning board. My
name is John. Every than in
France. And I was here before
you last week regarding an
incident of a death threat
being reported to the
sheriff’s office. Since that
time, the Chronicle has run a
sort of a clarification buried
in the local section that you
have to go online to find what
the issue is. And it’s out in
the 16th paragraph. So it’s
not really an apology and
hardly anybody will notice it.
But what happened was a
citizen of Citrus County who’s
running for County commission,
came into the sheriff’s and
reported a death threat. Then
she came to the county
commission and said that she
had done it. And the Chronicle
said it was a lie that she had
never reported it even though
they had the video that they
that she did. And and you
know, the issue really that I
have, which you can address is
the the sheriff’s office
mishandling it because they
didn’t put it in in written
report. so I found out that
Jennifer Grogan has gone back
to the sheriff’s office. She’s
spoken to commit a crime
detective and they have
subpoena to her phone records
to try to find out who trace
it, which I believe should
have been done in the first
place. So my issue is that the
sheriff’s office is not
handling these issues
correctly from the beginning.
And so we Co go back after
they find out because of you
article in the newspaper that
the report was never filed
properly. So hope, you know,
tomorrow’s election but you’re
a gun and still be there for
at least the next few months,
regardless of what happens in
the election. So I would like
to see this addressed, you
know, the sheriff’s in a way
has acknowledged that it was
but it shouldn’t take in all
this to make that happen. I
think procedures and to be put
in place so that when somebody
comes to the sheriff’s office
with complain about a death
threat, that there is a
procedure that’s followed,
that the call was traced. You
know, if it’s a it’s a came in
through a phone call and that
it’s not dismissed in the
report immunity. Put that it’s
an every day, something like
an everyday thing which is
just totally wrong exposed