1 00:02:29,249 --> 00:02:33,449 Today is wednesday, october 30. This is the 2 00:02:34,254 --> 00:02:37,254 social services ad hoc committee. 3 00:02:44,264 --> 00:02:46,233 we are a couple minutes late. We just had a 4 00:02:46,233 --> 00:02:49,236 fire alarm, luckily a false fire alarm. 5 00:02:49,236 --> 00:02:51,238 we have our fantastic fire chief here joining us. 6 00:02:51,238 --> 00:02:53,238 so 7 00:02:54,241 --> 00:02:56,243 we are ready to start the 8 00:02:56,243 --> 00:02:59,246 meeting. To be have public comments? 9 00:02:59,246 --> 00:03:02,249 >> no public comments. >> great. So we will be 10 00:03:02,249 --> 00:03:05,849 discussing the community assistance grant funding 11 00:03:09,256 --> 00:03:10,390 current and future needs and 12 00:03:10,390 --> 00:03:12,259 recommend changes. Me we have a report, 13 00:03:12,259 --> 00:03:13,260 please? 14 00:03:13,260 --> 00:03:14,261 >> yes, tbyte. I will kick 15 00:03:14,261 --> 00:03:15,529 it 16 00:03:15,529 --> 00:03:18,232 off briefly. We have been working over the last 17 00:03:18,232 --> 00:03:19,333 year or so 18 00:03:19,333 --> 00:03:21,235 and looking at our community assistance 19 00:03:21,235 --> 00:03:23,235 grant 20 00:03:24,238 --> 00:03:26,238 fund program, as 21 00:03:27,241 --> 00:03:28,242 well as social services 22 00:03:28,242 --> 00:03:29,243 in general. Things have really changed 23 00:03:29,243 --> 00:03:32,246 over the past few years, particularly 24 00:03:32,246 --> 00:03:33,247 related to social services. The council 25 00:03:33,247 --> 00:03:34,248 has 26 00:03:34,248 --> 00:03:36,250 committed millions of dollars to a 27 00:03:36,250 --> 00:03:38,252 number of social services 28 00:03:38,252 --> 00:03:40,254 program such as housing, homeless programs 29 00:03:40,254 --> 00:03:43,254 for those that are disadvantaged, 30 00:03:45,259 --> 00:03:47,261 and as a result we 31 00:03:47,261 --> 00:03:51,231 have been working on reconfiguring our community assistance 32 00:03:51,231 --> 00:03:52,232 grant fund program. 33 00:03:52,232 --> 00:03:54,234 we made changes for this current fy 34 00:03:54,234 --> 00:03:55,335 and 35 00:03:55,335 --> 00:04:00,135 we are here today to talk about further 36 00:04:00,240 --> 00:04:01,275 possible changes to make in light 37 00:04:01,275 --> 00:04:03,243 of the programs and resources that 38 00:04:03,243 --> 00:04:04,278 the council has set 39 00:04:04,278 --> 00:04:08,478 aside in other parts of our budget. 40 00:04:09,249 --> 00:04:12,252 with that I will hand it over to 41 00:04:12,252 --> 00:04:14,652 >> no. For. >> thank you. 42 00:04:15,255 --> 00:04:17,255 good afternoon 43 00:04:20,260 --> 00:04:21,261 . We were in front of you in june 44 00:04:21,261 --> 00:04:22,296 of this year. We were seeking 45 00:04:22,296 --> 00:04:24,264 authority to approve the 2024-2025 46 00:04:24,264 --> 00:04:26,264 cagf 47 00:04:27,234 --> 00:04:30,234 slate of recommended grants. At 48 00:04:30,237 --> 00:04:33,240 that time we talked about making 49 00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:36,240 some changes for this year's 50 00:04:38,245 --> 00:04:39,246 process. Yourself and full council 51 00:04:39,246 --> 00:04:41,248 approved the changes in late 52 00:04:41,248 --> 00:04:45,252 june. To just review where that took us, 53 00:04:45,252 --> 00:04:47,252 and 54 00:04:47,254 --> 00:04:51,258 you can also follow along with attachments a or b 55 00:04:51,258 --> 00:04:53,258 in your packet. 56 00:04:54,261 --> 00:04:56,263 so, at the start of 57 00:04:56,263 --> 00:04:57,264 this year we were recommending bifurcating the 58 00:04:57,264 --> 00:04:59,264 cagf 59 00:05:00,234 --> 00:05:02,236 process into two different 60 00:05:02,236 --> 00:05:03,237 categories, one being the traditional 61 00:05:03,237 --> 00:05:05,237 grant 62 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,243 and the other being a contracted 63 00:05:09,243 --> 00:05:12,243 critical service provider set up. 64 00:05:12,246 --> 00:05:14,246 the chart here 65 00:05:15,249 --> 00:05:18,249 lists all of the 2024-25 66 00:05:18,252 --> 00:05:20,252 cagf grants. 67 00:05:21,255 --> 00:05:23,255 there were 23 organizations 68 00:05:26,260 --> 00:05:29,263 funded in the amount of 1.1 million. We also recommended 69 00:05:29,263 --> 00:05:34,630 converting five of the grantees into a critical 70 00:05:34,234 --> 00:05:36,236 service provider agreement in which 71 00:05:36,236 --> 00:05:37,237 we would contract with them for the 72 00:05:37,237 --> 00:05:38,272 same 73 00:05:38,272 --> 00:05:39,239 amount as the previous cagf award, 74 00:05:39,239 --> 00:05:41,241 but it would be for as needed 75 00:05:41,241 --> 00:05:44,841 based on services rendered. They would 76 00:05:47,247 --> 00:05:48,315 invoice after the service was rendered, 77 00:05:48,315 --> 00:05:49,249 only for what they actually produced 78 00:05:49,249 --> 00:05:50,384 or 79 00:05:50,384 --> 00:05:53,384 performed. The amount is 1.292 million. 80 00:05:54,254 --> 00:05:55,255 if we look at the bottom chart 81 00:05:55,255 --> 00:05:57,257 here, the total combined traditional 82 00:05:57,257 --> 00:05:59,257 cagf 83 00:06:00,260 --> 00:06:02,260 coupled with the 84 00:06:03,263 --> 00:06:06,233 critical service agreements for these five organizations 85 00:06:06,233 --> 00:06:09,236 brings us to a total of 86 00:06:09,236 --> 00:06:11,236 $2,406,144 87 00:06:12,239 --> 00:06:15,239 for the current fiscal year. 88 00:06:17,244 --> 00:06:18,245 recognizing as the city manager said 89 00:06:18,245 --> 00:06:20,245 that there are 90 00:06:20,247 --> 00:06:21,248 changes in the community currently and will 91 00:06:21,248 --> 00:06:23,248 king 92 00:06:24,251 --> 00:06:26,253 at the future and participating 93 00:06:26,253 --> 00:06:27,254 additional changes, we would like 94 00:06:27,254 --> 00:06:29,654 to really make this 95 00:06:30,257 --> 00:06:33,257 program more reflective of the 96 00:06:33,260 --> 00:06:35,262 needs of the community. 97 00:06:35,262 --> 00:06:38,232 is the city manager mentioned we have invested 98 00:06:38,232 --> 00:06:42,236 a great deal of funding, the council has approved 99 00:06:42,236 --> 00:06:44,236 over $3 million 100 00:06:45,239 --> 00:06:47,239 in homeless specific 101 00:06:48,242 --> 00:06:50,242 funds 102 00:06:50,244 --> 00:06:51,245 directly. It can be broken down through 103 00:06:51,245 --> 00:06:53,645 looking at the step 104 00:06:54,248 --> 00:06:56,250 up on second agreement, 105 00:06:56,250 --> 00:06:57,251 there is a software system, the apricot 106 00:06:57,251 --> 00:06:59,251 system, 107 00:07:00,254 --> 00:07:02,254 we have the 108 00:07:06,260 --> 00:07:07,261 p.a.t.h. Shelter beds at 138,000, 109 00:07:07,261 --> 00:07:08,295 providing five beds 110 00:07:08,295 --> 00:07:13,950 every day of the year. We also have 111 00:07:14,234 --> 00:07:15,269 partners such as the all saints episcopal 112 00:07:15,269 --> 00:07:16,236 church, they assist with the home 113 00:07:16,236 --> 00:07:18,236 again program. 114 00:07:18,238 --> 00:07:20,240 there is safe parking l.a., 115 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:24,244 and our new partner healthcare in action. 116 00:07:24,244 --> 00:07:27,247 I do want to note that in terms 117 00:07:27,247 --> 00:07:30,247 of services to the un-housed, 118 00:07:30,250 --> 00:07:32,250 and as 119 00:07:32,252 --> 00:07:33,253 a result of looking at all of the 120 00:07:33,253 --> 00:07:36,253 different service providers, we have 121 00:07:36,256 --> 00:07:39,259 to find a more cost-effective way of 122 00:07:39,259 --> 00:07:42,262 dividing the same level of service 123 00:07:42,262 --> 00:07:43,263 to how it relates to the unhoused 124 00:07:43,263 --> 00:07:44,298 hotline, 125 00:07:44,298 --> 00:07:46,233 as well as the ability to transport 126 00:07:46,233 --> 00:07:47,234 a 127 00:07:47,234 --> 00:07:48,302 person to a motel in the middle of 128 00:07:48,302 --> 00:07:51,902 the night, should they request such 129 00:07:52,239 --> 00:07:54,639 assistance. Working with the 130 00:07:55,242 --> 00:07:57,242 police departments current 131 00:07:57,244 --> 00:08:01,248 providers for supplemental services, that company covers 132 00:08:01,248 --> 00:08:03,248 six, they 133 00:08:04,251 --> 00:08:06,253 have agreed to take on this 134 00:08:06,253 --> 00:08:08,255 service at no additional cost. Effective 135 00:08:08,255 --> 00:08:13,550 this past monday, the 28th, we were there 136 00:08:13,260 --> 00:08:16,260 and able to end our 137 00:08:16,263 --> 00:08:17,297 relationship with nass tech 138 00:08:17,297 --> 00:08:19,233 , they were providing the service 139 00:08:19,233 --> 00:08:21,633 in a customized package, 140 00:08:24,238 --> 00:08:25,239 in an amount that the city should 141 00:08:25,239 --> 00:08:26,373 be able 142 00:08:26,373 --> 00:08:28,242 to realize in future savings is $930,000. 143 00:08:28,242 --> 00:08:30,244 and by eliminating that 144 00:08:30,244 --> 00:08:33,244 $930,000, that does reduce the total 145 00:08:34,248 --> 00:08:36,248 annual spending on 146 00:08:36,250 --> 00:08:38,252 unhoused services, to 2.1 million. 147 00:08:38,252 --> 00:08:42,452 now, also looking forward to the future, 148 00:08:43,257 --> 00:08:44,391 there were other needs that 149 00:08:44,391 --> 00:08:47,261 come up that both the community service 150 00:08:47,261 --> 00:08:50,861 department and human services division have 151 00:08:51,231 --> 00:08:52,232 identified. Some have been providing 152 00:08:52,232 --> 00:08:54,232 behavioral 153 00:08:55,235 --> 00:08:58,238 services to some of the youth 154 00:08:58,238 --> 00:08:59,373 in the populations that 155 00:08:59,373 --> 00:09:01,241 we serve in our school programs. Such as 156 00:09:01,241 --> 00:09:03,641 the afterschool adventure camp. 157 00:09:04,244 --> 00:09:05,379 that is just one example of how 158 00:09:05,379 --> 00:09:07,247 some of these funds could be repurposed. 159 00:09:07,247 --> 00:09:09,249 or they could be 160 00:09:09,249 --> 00:09:13,253 used for future needs. It is also our understanding 161 00:09:13,253 --> 00:09:15,255 that we are looking at 162 00:09:15,255 --> 00:09:16,256 various departments looking for additional 163 00:09:16,256 --> 00:09:17,524 ways that the 164 00:09:17,524 --> 00:09:22,262 city can reduce expenses. And one proposal that 165 00:09:22,262 --> 00:09:25,232 we have is additional changes to 166 00:09:25,232 --> 00:09:27,632 the grant process. Actually 167 00:09:28,235 --> 00:09:30,235 placing the grant 168 00:09:32,239 --> 00:09:34,241 process on hiatus for the 2025-26 169 00:09:34,241 --> 00:09:37,241 year, which is the fiscal 170 00:09:37,244 --> 00:09:39,246 year that would start 171 00:09:39,246 --> 00:09:41,248 july, 2025. And we are looking for the specific 12 172 00:09:41,248 --> 00:09:43,250 , technically 13, I will actually 173 00:09:43,250 --> 00:09:45,650 not momentarily, putting these 174 00:09:46,253 --> 00:09:48,253 organizations on hiatus. 175 00:09:49,256 --> 00:09:51,258 doing that would provide 176 00:09:51,258 --> 00:09:53,258 savings of approximately $370,000. 177 00:09:58,232 --> 00:10:00,234 the last item that you see on 178 00:10:00,234 --> 00:10:01,235 the bottom of the chart is the westside 179 00:10:01,235 --> 00:10:02,236 food bank. I indicated that there 180 00:10:02,236 --> 00:10:04,236 is 181 00:10:04,238 --> 00:10:06,238 recommended savings of $200,000. 182 00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:07,241 their current agreement is for $250,000. 183 00:10:07,241 --> 00:10:09,241 we are recommending 184 00:10:10,244 --> 00:10:12,244 is 185 00:10:13,247 --> 00:10:15,247 still awarding $50,000 contract, 186 00:10:16,250 --> 00:10:18,650 that would help provide, 187 00:10:19,253 --> 00:10:20,254 as well as just regional food 188 00:10:20,254 --> 00:10:22,256 pantry support, direct deliveries 189 00:10:22,256 --> 00:10:25,259 to our housing program for the formally 190 00:10:25,259 --> 00:10:26,260 unhoused. 191 00:10:26,260 --> 00:10:28,262 we set that up at the beginning of 192 00:10:28,262 --> 00:10:30,662 this year and they 193 00:10:31,231 --> 00:10:33,631 are receiving weekly deliveries. 194 00:10:34,234 --> 00:10:36,234 um, what we 195 00:10:37,237 --> 00:10:39,239 are also recommending is 196 00:10:39,239 --> 00:10:42,242 to create a new category called community service 197 00:10:42,242 --> 00:10:43,243 providers. Much like the critical 198 00:10:43,243 --> 00:10:45,243 service 199 00:10:45,245 --> 00:10:46,246 providers, they would be not to exceed 200 00:10:46,246 --> 00:10:48,248 a mount with services 201 00:10:48,248 --> 00:10:49,249 paid for as they are rendered. And 202 00:10:49,249 --> 00:10:51,649 we took a look 203 00:10:52,252 --> 00:10:54,652 at 11 of our current 204 00:10:55,255 --> 00:10:57,255 cagf organizations. We 205 00:10:58,258 --> 00:10:59,259 identified some of these that could 206 00:10:59,259 --> 00:11:00,327 be 207 00:11:00,327 --> 00:11:01,261 important to have for the community, 208 00:11:01,261 --> 00:11:04,861 but we are not sure if 209 00:11:07,234 --> 00:11:09,236 it is needed to be 210 00:11:09,236 --> 00:11:10,237 funded at this full amount or if it 211 00:11:10,237 --> 00:11:13,240 would be more appropriate to be 212 00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:14,308 funded based on invoices 213 00:11:14,308 --> 00:11:15,309 submitted for work performed. Another 214 00:11:15,309 --> 00:11:16,243 concern that comes up regularly with 215 00:11:16,243 --> 00:11:18,243 the 216 00:11:19,246 --> 00:11:22,246 cagf ad hoc of both 217 00:11:24,251 --> 00:11:25,285 the council members, as well as human 218 00:11:25,285 --> 00:11:26,253 relations commission and charitable 219 00:11:26,253 --> 00:11:27,254 solicitations 220 00:11:27,254 --> 00:11:29,256 commission, is, are we certain that 221 00:11:29,256 --> 00:11:30,257 beverly hills residents exclusively 222 00:11:30,257 --> 00:11:31,258 are receiving this financial and if 223 00:11:31,258 --> 00:11:33,658 it through these grants? 224 00:11:35,262 --> 00:11:37,264 in some of these organizations that 225 00:11:37,264 --> 00:11:40,264 we are recommending placing on 226 00:11:42,236 --> 00:11:43,237 hiatus, it is hard to quantify because 227 00:11:43,237 --> 00:11:46,237 they do serve the region. 228 00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:48,240 whereas, some that 229 00:11:49,243 --> 00:11:51,245 we are recommending as 230 00:11:51,245 --> 00:11:52,312 community service providers, we know 231 00:11:52,312 --> 00:11:55,249 their services are more concentrated 232 00:11:55,249 --> 00:11:56,250 to beverly hills but not quite at 233 00:11:56,250 --> 00:11:57,251 the level of 234 00:11:57,251 --> 00:11:58,252 the critical service provider, which 235 00:11:58,252 --> 00:12:00,652 would be this group. 236 00:12:01,255 --> 00:12:02,289 if we were to 237 00:12:02,289 --> 00:12:04,258 discontinue funding this group of 238 00:12:04,258 --> 00:12:06,258 riders, we would 239 00:12:06,260 --> 00:12:09,860 see detrimental impacts in the community. 240 00:12:10,264 --> 00:12:12,264 so, 241 00:12:13,233 --> 00:12:14,234 in 242 00:12:14,234 --> 00:12:16,236 conclusion what we are recommending 243 00:12:16,236 --> 00:12:18,236 is 244 00:12:19,239 --> 00:12:21,239 contracting with the 11 245 00:12:22,242 --> 00:12:25,242 groups at a cost of 246 00:12:25,245 --> 00:12:27,245 $535,000, continuing to 247 00:12:27,247 --> 00:12:28,248 contract with the five critical service 248 00:12:28,248 --> 00:12:30,248 providers at 249 00:12:34,254 --> 00:12:38,454 $1.2 million, for a total of $1.8 million. By 250 00:12:42,262 --> 00:12:43,263 leasing the 12 organizations on hiatus, 251 00:12:43,263 --> 00:12:46,233 that would generate a savings 252 00:12:46,233 --> 00:12:48,233 of about $578,000. So 253 00:12:51,238 --> 00:12:52,239 this is the recommendation before 254 00:12:52,239 --> 00:12:53,240 you. We are here to 255 00:12:53,240 --> 00:12:54,241 answer questions you may have. 256 00:12:54,241 --> 00:12:55,375 >> 257 00:12:55,375 --> 00:12:56,243 great, thank you so much. Councilmember? 258 00:12:56,243 --> 00:12:58,243 please go ahead. 259 00:12:58,245 --> 00:13:00,645 >> it seems a bit 260 00:13:01,248 --> 00:13:04,251 extreme to put them all on 261 00:13:04,251 --> 00:13:06,253 hiatus. I think we need to, 262 00:13:06,253 --> 00:13:07,254 I mean some seem obvious. But I do 263 00:13:07,254 --> 00:13:09,654 believe others do provide 264 00:13:10,257 --> 00:13:12,257 services 265 00:13:12,259 --> 00:13:13,260 for the residents. I am wondering on what 266 00:13:13,260 --> 00:13:15,260 basis 267 00:13:15,262 --> 00:13:18,262 is the recommendation being made. 268 00:13:19,233 --> 00:13:22,233 >> this recommendation is being made 269 00:13:28,242 --> 00:13:29,243 based on us looking at the quarterly 270 00:13:29,243 --> 00:13:30,244 reports 271 00:13:30,244 --> 00:13:31,245 from the previous fiscal year end 272 00:13:31,245 --> 00:13:32,246 identifying the services that were 273 00:13:32,246 --> 00:13:33,247 rendered to beverly 274 00:13:33,247 --> 00:13:34,248 hills residents in particular. Or 275 00:13:34,248 --> 00:13:36,248 if the 276 00:13:37,251 --> 00:13:39,253 contract or agreement was 277 00:13:39,253 --> 00:13:42,253 effective, generally speaking. The affordable 278 00:13:43,257 --> 00:13:45,657 living for the aging, 279 00:13:46,260 --> 00:13:48,660 they enrolled 63 new participants. 280 00:13:49,263 --> 00:13:52,232 they did 13 home visits, and 281 00:13:52,232 --> 00:13:54,232 870 email inquiries 282 00:13:56,236 --> 00:13:58,236 that they fielded. 283 00:13:58,238 --> 00:13:59,239 but the number of beverly hills residents 284 00:13:59,239 --> 00:14:01,239 in that group 285 00:14:02,242 --> 00:14:03,243 was only 10. 286 00:14:03,243 --> 00:14:06,843 another organization we could look at 287 00:14:08,248 --> 00:14:10,248 -- exactly. 288 00:14:14,254 --> 00:14:15,322 tower cancer. 289 00:14:15,322 --> 00:14:16,390 let me pull up my data on that one. 290 00:14:16,390 --> 00:14:18,258 so approximately 10% of program services 291 00:14:18,258 --> 00:14:19,259 are utilized by the beverly hills 292 00:14:19,259 --> 00:14:22,859 community. I think in the report. 293 00:14:25,232 --> 00:14:26,233 >> 10% of overall services? Because 294 00:14:26,233 --> 00:14:28,233 $50,000 295 00:14:29,236 --> 00:14:32,236 is not going to fund 296 00:14:32,239 --> 00:14:33,240 a lot. I 297 00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:34,241 mean if they are saying 10% of the 298 00:14:34,241 --> 00:14:35,242 total volume is beverly hills residents 299 00:14:35,242 --> 00:14:36,243 and 300 00:14:36,243 --> 00:14:38,245 they have 10,000 people, that is 1000 301 00:14:38,245 --> 00:14:40,247 people, a significant amount. 302 00:14:40,247 --> 00:14:43,250 >> they say 10% of the grant amount 303 00:14:43,250 --> 00:14:47,254 goes directly to ph eight beverly hills 304 00:14:47,254 --> 00:14:49,254 residents. 305 00:14:50,257 --> 00:14:52,657 the other percentage would 306 00:14:53,260 --> 00:14:54,261 -- 307 00:14:54,261 --> 00:14:56,261 >> I guess what 308 00:14:56,263 --> 00:14:59,233 I would say is I would contact each 309 00:14:59,233 --> 00:15:01,235 of them and let them 310 00:15:01,235 --> 00:15:02,236 know that there would be the hiatus, 311 00:15:02,236 --> 00:15:05,236 allow them to come to 312 00:15:05,239 --> 00:15:06,507 us and try to explain that 313 00:15:06,507 --> 00:15:11,245 they understand that this is to serve our residents. 314 00:15:11,245 --> 00:15:12,579 and why 315 00:15:12,579 --> 00:15:16,250 either they accept it, or why we should reconsider. 316 00:15:16,250 --> 00:15:17,251 I would say, you know, because knowing 317 00:15:17,251 --> 00:15:18,252 that we 318 00:15:18,252 --> 00:15:20,254 expect that if we are providing x 319 00:15:20,254 --> 00:15:22,256 amount of dollars and only 320 00:15:22,256 --> 00:15:25,259 10% of those dollars are being used for our residents, 321 00:15:25,259 --> 00:15:26,260 that is something that we are not 322 00:15:26,260 --> 00:15:28,260 going 323 00:15:28,262 --> 00:15:29,263 to be able to continue to support, 324 00:15:29,263 --> 00:15:31,231 because 325 00:15:31,231 --> 00:15:32,232 we have many other needs for our residents. 326 00:15:32,232 --> 00:15:34,232 >> but how 327 00:15:35,235 --> 00:15:36,303 would they be able 328 00:15:36,303 --> 00:15:38,238 to change that? If that is the number 329 00:15:38,238 --> 00:15:40,638 of residents that are 330 00:15:41,241 --> 00:15:42,543 coming to the organization. 331 00:15:42,543 --> 00:15:44,244 >> outreach. Or they just would not contest 332 00:15:44,244 --> 00:15:46,244 it 333 00:15:46,246 --> 00:15:52,252 and would say sorry, we are here for everybody. We cannot 334 00:15:52,252 --> 00:15:53,253 decide who comes to us. We understand. You know, ultimately 335 00:15:53,253 --> 00:15:54,388 they 336 00:15:54,388 --> 00:15:58,588 should understand that we are doing this 337 00:15:59,259 --> 00:16:00,294 , you know, 338 00:16:00,294 --> 00:16:01,395 there are resources for the county 339 00:16:01,395 --> 00:16:05,232 and other communities that they can look 340 00:16:05,232 --> 00:16:06,233 at, but 341 00:16:06,233 --> 00:16:08,235 we are doing this specifically for 342 00:16:08,235 --> 00:16:13,350 our residents and there are a lot of 343 00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:14,241 these. I would just give them the 344 00:16:14,241 --> 00:16:16,243 chance. I am guessing if 345 00:16:16,243 --> 00:16:17,244 they cannot back it up or say sorry, 346 00:16:17,244 --> 00:16:18,245 we don't have a lot of 347 00:16:18,245 --> 00:16:20,247 beverly hills residents that use our 348 00:16:20,247 --> 00:16:21,248 services, there is not a great argument 349 00:16:21,248 --> 00:16:22,249 to 350 00:16:22,249 --> 00:16:25,252 continue or not put them on hiatus. 351 00:16:25,252 --> 00:16:26,253 >> part of the reason we are starting 352 00:16:26,253 --> 00:16:27,254 this process really early, we are 353 00:16:27,254 --> 00:16:30,854 talking about grants that would take 354 00:16:32,259 --> 00:16:33,327 place, you know, seven, eight, 355 00:16:33,327 --> 00:16:35,262 nine months from now. It is so that 356 00:16:35,262 --> 00:16:37,262 we 357 00:16:37,264 --> 00:16:41,235 get some feedback from the ad hoc and 358 00:16:41,235 --> 00:16:43,237 we can let the organizations know ahead of time 359 00:16:43,237 --> 00:16:46,837 before the applications would normally have 360 00:16:47,241 --> 00:16:50,244 gone out, that we intend to put their grant on 361 00:16:50,244 --> 00:16:52,244 hiatus. 362 00:16:55,249 --> 00:16:56,250 we could certainly come up with some 363 00:16:56,250 --> 00:16:59,250 sort of process where they 364 00:16:59,253 --> 00:17:00,254 can submit a letter. 365 00:17:00,254 --> 00:17:01,255 >> or come here 366 00:17:01,255 --> 00:17:02,256 and 367 00:17:02,256 --> 00:17:03,257 explain and answer questions. But 368 00:17:03,257 --> 00:17:04,258 with those savings, shouldn't we 369 00:17:04,258 --> 00:17:05,259 be looking at reinvesting them in 370 00:17:05,259 --> 00:17:06,326 services that are 371 00:17:06,326 --> 00:17:09,326 residents actually take advantage of? 372 00:17:11,231 --> 00:17:13,233 >> yes, I think that is one of 373 00:17:13,233 --> 00:17:14,234 the things mr. Paulson was talking 374 00:17:14,234 --> 00:17:16,634 about. We are experiencing, 375 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:21,241 maybe director harris can speak to 376 00:17:21,241 --> 00:17:22,242 some 377 00:17:22,242 --> 00:17:23,243 of the challenges we are having with 378 00:17:23,243 --> 00:17:25,643 the afterschool programming. Please. 379 00:17:26,246 --> 00:17:27,247 >> it sounds like, it is not included 380 00:17:27,247 --> 00:17:28,382 here, 381 00:17:28,382 --> 00:17:32,252 the 900 grand we are saving on nass tech. 382 00:17:32,252 --> 00:17:33,253 that is not included. 383 00:17:33,253 --> 00:17:35,253 >> it is imported 384 00:17:38,258 --> 00:17:39,259 --important to know 385 00:17:39,259 --> 00:17:41,261 that that funding was essentially 386 00:17:41,261 --> 00:17:44,264 one time funding that was taking us through 387 00:17:44,264 --> 00:17:46,233 december of 388 00:17:46,233 --> 00:17:47,234 this year. So it is not that it was 389 00:17:47,234 --> 00:17:49,236 ongoing funding. But it was not 390 00:17:49,236 --> 00:17:50,237 something that we have to find money 391 00:17:50,237 --> 00:17:51,238 for moving forward. 392 00:17:51,238 --> 00:17:53,238 >> 393 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:55,240 briefly 394 00:17:56,243 --> 00:17:59,246 speaking to some of the new things 395 00:17:59,246 --> 00:18:00,247 we found, adventure camp program and 396 00:18:00,247 --> 00:18:01,248 afterschool 397 00:18:01,248 --> 00:18:02,349 programming, we are servicing about 398 00:18:02,349 --> 00:18:05,252 430 students. Our universal tk program 399 00:18:05,252 --> 00:18:07,652 has brought in students 400 00:18:08,255 --> 00:18:12,455 as early as four years old now. 401 00:18:14,261 --> 00:18:16,263 so, really long days. We are 402 00:18:16,263 --> 00:18:17,331 starting to see students who are taking 403 00:18:17,331 --> 00:18:18,232 advantage of our programs until 5:00 404 00:18:18,232 --> 00:18:19,299 p.m. However, 405 00:18:19,299 --> 00:18:20,234 during the school day they have aids 406 00:18:20,234 --> 00:18:22,236 and during the adventure camp 407 00:18:22,236 --> 00:18:23,237 program they do not. Just because 408 00:18:23,237 --> 00:18:25,237 that is not 409 00:18:26,240 --> 00:18:28,640 something that we currently 410 00:18:29,243 --> 00:18:30,244 offer. Ideally we would like to bring 411 00:18:30,244 --> 00:18:31,512 in 412 00:18:31,512 --> 00:18:35,249 a partnership and bring somebody on any contractual basis 413 00:18:35,249 --> 00:18:40,254 to be able to provide continuous service to the students 414 00:18:40,254 --> 00:18:41,255 who need support for afterschool care, 415 00:18:41,255 --> 00:18:43,257 so they can successfully 416 00:18:43,257 --> 00:18:44,291 participate in our programs. That 417 00:18:44,291 --> 00:18:45,259 is what we were referencing in the 418 00:18:45,259 --> 00:18:47,259 report on 419 00:18:47,261 --> 00:18:48,262 some of new needs the community may 420 00:18:48,262 --> 00:18:49,296 have, that 421 00:18:49,296 --> 00:18:52,896 we did not necessarily have previously. 422 00:18:53,233 --> 00:18:56,236 >> to recharge for those fees, to have 423 00:18:56,236 --> 00:18:57,237 the aides? 424 00:18:57,237 --> 00:18:59,237 >> currently we 425 00:18:59,239 --> 00:19:02,239 do not have ability to 426 00:19:03,243 --> 00:19:05,243 provide the aides. 427 00:19:05,245 --> 00:19:06,246 >> but would it be charged for if 428 00:19:06,246 --> 00:19:07,247 we provided 429 00:19:07,247 --> 00:19:08,248 the service? 430 00:19:08,248 --> 00:19:09,249 >> we would have to work 431 00:19:09,249 --> 00:19:10,250 through the risk management and 432 00:19:10,250 --> 00:19:12,252 the a.d.a. Accommodation process. 433 00:19:12,252 --> 00:19:15,255 so there is the possibility of 434 00:19:15,255 --> 00:19:18,255 us to be able to 435 00:19:18,258 --> 00:19:19,560 recoup some cost. 436 00:19:19,560 --> 00:19:23,263 however, based on the a.d.a. Requirements, we would 437 00:19:23,263 --> 00:19:24,264 be able to support them if necessary. 438 00:19:24,264 --> 00:19:25,332 >> 439 00:19:25,332 --> 00:19:30,132 and that was one of my questions, with 440 00:19:32,239 --> 00:19:33,240 regard to the grant funding. So, this 441 00:19:33,240 --> 00:19:35,240 was 442 00:19:36,243 --> 00:19:38,245 not included in our jpa? 443 00:19:38,245 --> 00:19:39,246 is this part of the agreement we arty 444 00:19:39,246 --> 00:19:40,247 have in place? Or 445 00:19:40,247 --> 00:19:44,447 will this be in addition to that? 446 00:19:45,252 --> 00:19:47,652 >> so, yes and no. 447 00:19:48,255 --> 00:19:51,255 we use the school district 448 00:19:55,262 --> 00:19:57,264 properties for a variety of things 449 00:19:57,264 --> 00:19:58,298 because the jpa, which we pay a 450 00:19:58,298 --> 00:19:59,333 great deal of money for, and then 451 00:19:59,333 --> 00:20:00,234 we use their facilities for our programs, 452 00:20:00,234 --> 00:20:01,235 so 453 00:20:01,235 --> 00:20:02,269 for the afterschool programming for 454 00:20:02,269 --> 00:20:04,238 example, we use the school sites. 455 00:20:04,238 --> 00:20:06,240 so the children who are on campus 456 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:08,240 during the day 457 00:20:08,242 --> 00:20:09,243 are currently able to stay, you know, 458 00:20:09,243 --> 00:20:11,243 until their 459 00:20:11,245 --> 00:20:12,246 parents are able to pick them up . 460 00:20:12,246 --> 00:20:14,246 having said 461 00:20:15,249 --> 00:20:16,283 that the programming itself , if you 462 00:20:16,283 --> 00:20:18,252 want to have your child participate in 463 00:20:18,252 --> 00:20:20,252 adventure camp 464 00:20:21,255 --> 00:20:23,257 after school, the daycare, and 465 00:20:23,257 --> 00:20:24,258 is a service that parents do pay for. 466 00:20:24,258 --> 00:20:26,258 we are 467 00:20:27,261 --> 00:20:28,495 in the process of looking at, 468 00:20:28,495 --> 00:20:33,233 making sure the program is at least cost recovery. 469 00:20:33,233 --> 00:20:36,236 and then as far as aides go, afterschool aides, 470 00:20:36,236 --> 00:20:38,236 I think 471 00:20:39,239 --> 00:20:41,241 that it would depend, 472 00:20:41,241 --> 00:20:42,242 as the director was saying, as to 473 00:20:42,242 --> 00:20:43,410 whether they are needed because 474 00:20:43,410 --> 00:20:47,247 of an issue, disability issue with the child. 475 00:20:47,247 --> 00:20:48,248 in which case that is something we 476 00:20:48,248 --> 00:20:50,648 are required to provide. 477 00:21:00,260 --> 00:21:02,262 as opposed to having some tk students, 478 00:21:02,262 --> 00:21:03,263 some that are four years old, at the 479 00:21:03,263 --> 00:21:05,232 site for five or six hours 480 00:21:05,232 --> 00:21:06,233 a day and then with us for three additional 481 00:21:06,233 --> 00:21:08,235 hours a day. It is leading 482 00:21:08,235 --> 00:21:09,236 to a new world of some challenges. 483 00:21:09,236 --> 00:21:11,636 those kids are tired. 484 00:21:12,239 --> 00:21:13,240 and they are needing a little bit 485 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:15,240 more 486 00:21:15,242 --> 00:21:18,242 of staff to student ratio, 487 00:21:18,245 --> 00:21:20,247 lower staff to student ratio. 488 00:21:20,247 --> 00:21:24,251 >> got it, thank you. First of all 489 00:21:24,251 --> 00:21:25,252 I guess starting with controlling 490 00:21:25,252 --> 00:21:26,587 our 491 00:21:26,587 --> 00:21:30,257 cost right now we need to be mindful of our budget. 492 00:21:30,257 --> 00:21:31,391 I think it 493 00:21:31,391 --> 00:21:33,260 is important to go through this exercise 494 00:21:33,260 --> 00:21:37,460 and see where we land with it. 495 00:21:38,232 --> 00:21:39,233 making sure that the services that 496 00:21:39,233 --> 00:21:40,267 are being provided, 497 00:21:40,267 --> 00:21:41,268 that are crucial to our community, 498 00:21:41,268 --> 00:21:42,236 I wholeheartedly support that. I think 499 00:21:42,236 --> 00:21:44,236 it is 500 00:21:44,238 --> 00:21:48,242 important. We don't want to have any 501 00:21:48,242 --> 00:21:50,642 gaps in our service 502 00:21:54,810 --> 00:21:55,282 , 503 00:21:55,282 --> 00:21:56,250 providing our service. And then specifically 504 00:21:56,250 --> 00:21:57,251 caring for beverly hills residents, 505 00:21:57,251 --> 00:21:58,252 I think that 506 00:21:58,252 --> 00:22:00,254 is important. Any of our unhoused 507 00:22:00,254 --> 00:22:02,256 are kind of moving through different 508 00:22:02,256 --> 00:22:07,656 cities and we are providing a very large service 509 00:22:12,232 --> 00:22:14,232 to that. 510 00:22:14,234 --> 00:22:15,235 I guess it depends on how you look 511 00:22:15,235 --> 00:22:16,270 at it. These are taxpayer dollars. 512 00:22:16,270 --> 00:22:18,238 so while I do support giving services 513 00:22:18,238 --> 00:22:19,239 to as many people as possible, we 514 00:22:19,239 --> 00:22:20,274 do 515 00:22:20,274 --> 00:22:21,241 need to focus on our own community 516 00:22:21,241 --> 00:22:23,243 as well. So while I'll support our 517 00:22:23,243 --> 00:22:24,244 unhoused, I also think there are programs in here 518 00:22:24,244 --> 00:22:26,244 that 519 00:22:27,247 --> 00:22:29,249 are wonderful, really great 520 00:22:29,249 --> 00:22:34,490 501(c)(3). But at the end of the day, 521 00:22:35,255 --> 00:22:36,256 or nonprofits, but at the end of the 522 00:22:36,256 --> 00:22:37,324 day we need to also focus on 523 00:22:37,324 --> 00:22:39,259 our own residents and providing the 524 00:22:39,259 --> 00:22:42,262 best level of service for that. I think moving 525 00:22:42,262 --> 00:22:43,430 human 526 00:22:43,430 --> 00:22:45,232 services department to the fire department 527 00:22:45,232 --> 00:22:48,232 has been a wonderful decision 528 00:22:48,235 --> 00:22:51,235 under the chief's leadership. And 529 00:22:51,238 --> 00:22:53,638 christopher getting a promotion, 530 00:22:54,241 --> 00:22:57,244 and we are really excited about 531 00:22:57,244 --> 00:22:58,245 the new level of leadership and everything 532 00:22:58,245 --> 00:23:00,245 you 533 00:23:00,247 --> 00:23:02,647 are doing with that. 534 00:23:06,253 --> 00:23:07,254 and this is part of that. Leadership 535 00:23:07,254 --> 00:23:08,322 is 536 00:23:08,322 --> 00:23:09,289 about making difficult decisions and 537 00:23:09,289 --> 00:23:10,257 moving forward with certain things 538 00:23:10,257 --> 00:23:11,325 that may not always be 539 00:23:11,325 --> 00:23:12,259 easy. I read some info in regard to 540 00:23:12,259 --> 00:23:15,262 p.a.t.h. That was 541 00:23:15,262 --> 00:23:17,262 concerning. 542 00:23:18,232 --> 00:23:21,832 and I want to know if, 543 00:23:24,238 --> 00:23:26,238 what information 544 00:23:27,241 --> 00:23:28,242 we have on that. We are working with 545 00:23:28,242 --> 00:23:30,242 an organization 546 00:23:30,244 --> 00:23:31,245 that -- 547 00:23:31,245 --> 00:23:33,245 >> there were a 548 00:23:33,247 --> 00:23:35,249 few articles in the l.a. Times recently about 549 00:23:35,249 --> 00:23:36,250 p.a.t.h. And some of the loan programs 550 00:23:36,250 --> 00:23:38,250 that they have . 551 00:23:39,253 --> 00:23:42,256 as far as I am aware those 552 00:23:42,256 --> 00:23:44,656 issues do not affect 553 00:23:45,259 --> 00:23:46,260 the programs that we have with p.a.t.h... 554 00:23:46,260 --> 00:23:48,260 unless I 555 00:23:48,262 --> 00:23:50,262 am missing something. 556 00:23:50,264 --> 00:23:51,231 oh, I am sorry. It was step up on 557 00:23:51,231 --> 00:23:53,631 second. I apologize. Sorry. 558 00:23:54,234 --> 00:23:58,434 >> yes, that is correct. Nothing, there is 559 00:23:59,239 --> 00:24:00,240 nothing that has impacted beverly 560 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:01,241 hills or that we have contributed 561 00:24:01,241 --> 00:24:02,309 funds to 562 00:24:02,309 --> 00:24:03,243 that is under scrutiny or in question 563 00:24:03,243 --> 00:24:05,243 as it relates 564 00:24:06,246 --> 00:24:09,249 to our relation with step up on second. 565 00:24:09,249 --> 00:24:11,249 >> great. 566 00:24:11,251 --> 00:24:14,254 that was the first thing I wanted to check on. 567 00:24:14,254 --> 00:24:15,255 and a lot of these programs, just 568 00:24:15,255 --> 00:24:18,255 for clarity, are payouts needed. 569 00:24:18,258 --> 00:24:20,258 -- 570 00:24:24,264 --> 00:24:25,232 pay as needed. I know we know the 571 00:24:25,232 --> 00:24:26,233 answer to 572 00:24:26,233 --> 00:24:27,267 this and sometimes we just ask for 573 00:24:27,267 --> 00:24:30,237 clarity. [ laughter ] if we budget 574 00:24:30,237 --> 00:24:32,237 $100,000 for a service, 575 00:24:33,240 --> 00:24:36,243 what is that process? Can you walk 576 00:24:36,243 --> 00:24:38,643 us through it, please. 577 00:24:42,249 --> 00:24:44,251 when they are contracted. 578 00:24:44,251 --> 00:24:45,252 >> yes, so if we use the p.a.t.h. 579 00:24:45,252 --> 00:24:47,652 as a perfect example. 580 00:24:48,255 --> 00:24:50,255 it is $130, 581 00:24:51,258 --> 00:24:53,260 and I believe it is about $10 per night per bed. 582 00:24:53,260 --> 00:24:57,264 and we are allowed to reserve five beds. 583 00:24:57,264 --> 00:24:59,264 my math might 584 00:25:02,236 --> 00:25:03,237 be off. In order to guarantee we have 585 00:25:03,237 --> 00:25:05,239 five beds, we have to pay 586 00:25:05,239 --> 00:25:06,240 for the beds whether they are filled 587 00:25:06,240 --> 00:25:08,640 or not. We are 588 00:25:09,243 --> 00:25:12,243 paying 365?5, that comes to about $90,000, 589 00:25:12,246 --> 00:25:15,246 I believe it is actually 90,500. 590 00:25:16,250 --> 00:25:18,650 and then the additional 95 591 00:25:19,253 --> 00:25:21,253 00 is 592 00:25:22,256 --> 00:25:25,256 additional to fund the grant. 593 00:25:28,262 --> 00:25:29,263 this 594 00:25:29,263 --> 00:25:30,264 year they sent the invoice, the report, 595 00:25:30,264 --> 00:25:31,231 they give the actual names of the 596 00:25:31,231 --> 00:25:32,266 unhoused 597 00:25:32,266 --> 00:25:34,234 person. John doe spent 34 nights in 598 00:25:34,234 --> 00:25:35,502 one of the beds. Then the 599 00:25:35,502 --> 00:25:39,239 bed was empty for 15 nights. Then jane doe spent 600 00:25:39,239 --> 00:25:40,240 16 nights in bed number two and it 601 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:41,241 was 602 00:25:41,241 --> 00:25:44,841 empty for three nights, for example. 603 00:25:46,246 --> 00:25:47,247 they give us the breakdown. And then 604 00:25:47,247 --> 00:25:49,249 of course in that situation we still 605 00:25:49,249 --> 00:25:50,317 have to pay for the bed, even when 606 00:25:50,317 --> 00:25:51,285 not used. So it is always there. That 607 00:25:51,285 --> 00:25:54,885 is what the invoicing looks like. 608 00:25:55,255 --> 00:25:58,255 if we look at the 609 00:26:01,261 --> 00:26:02,296 jewish family services of los 610 00:26:02,296 --> 00:26:03,397 angeles, for example, that is a large 611 00:26:03,397 --> 00:26:05,797 $500,000 agreement. They provide detail 612 00:26:06,233 --> 00:26:09,236 reporting each quarter of the different clients they 613 00:26:09,236 --> 00:26:11,238 serve and what type of service the client received. 614 00:26:11,238 --> 00:26:14,241 and what the service translated to 615 00:26:14,241 --> 00:26:18,441 in hours spent, like labor hours and 616 00:26:21,248 --> 00:26:22,249 what the cost is. For example, social 617 00:26:22,249 --> 00:26:23,250 worker provided 618 00:26:23,250 --> 00:26:24,351 10 hours of in-home supportive care 619 00:26:24,351 --> 00:26:28,255 over the past month. That comes out to 620 00:26:28,255 --> 00:26:30,255 $800, for example. 621 00:26:31,258 --> 00:26:34,258 then times however many clients, 622 00:26:34,261 --> 00:26:36,263 they have about 30 to 40 623 00:26:36,263 --> 00:26:37,264 clients currently. In those 30 to 624 00:26:37,264 --> 00:26:38,432 40 625 00:26:38,432 --> 00:26:39,333 clients are receiving a range of services. 626 00:26:39,333 --> 00:26:42,933 some folks are just getting occasional 627 00:26:43,237 --> 00:26:45,237 food gift cards, 628 00:26:45,239 --> 00:26:49,243 and others are receiving two, three, four 629 00:26:49,243 --> 00:26:52,243 days a week of supportive 630 00:26:52,246 --> 00:26:53,313 care, light cleaning, things 631 00:26:53,313 --> 00:26:58,113 like that. It runs the gamut of what 632 00:26:58,252 --> 00:26:59,253 the needs are. And they provide all 633 00:26:59,253 --> 00:27:00,254 the detail for us. 634 00:27:00,254 --> 00:27:01,255 >> thank you. That 635 00:27:01,255 --> 00:27:03,255 helps. [ laughter 636 00:27:04,258 --> 00:27:05,292 ] with regard to westside food bank, 637 00:27:05,292 --> 00:27:07,261 I see we are doing the $50,000 contract 638 00:27:07,261 --> 00:27:09,261 to provide 639 00:27:10,264 --> 00:27:12,664 fresh produce and food 640 00:27:13,233 --> 00:27:16,236 once a week to the residents in the city housing programs. 641 00:27:16,236 --> 00:27:19,236 have we asked our local 642 00:27:19,239 --> 00:27:20,407 grocers, for 643 00:27:20,407 --> 00:27:24,607 example beverly hills market, to make that 644 00:27:25,245 --> 00:27:27,245 , 645 00:27:27,247 --> 00:27:28,248 to provide those services? That way 646 00:27:28,248 --> 00:27:29,349 we are 647 00:27:29,349 --> 00:27:33,549 supporting a local business as well as 648 00:27:37,257 --> 00:27:38,325 --it is closer. And for them 649 00:27:38,325 --> 00:27:40,260 to be able to provide those services 650 00:27:40,260 --> 00:27:42,260 to our residents. 651 00:27:42,262 --> 00:27:46,233 >> so I think there is two answers to this 652 00:27:46,233 --> 00:27:47,234 question, I 653 00:27:47,234 --> 00:27:48,235 can answer the second part. We have 654 00:27:48,235 --> 00:27:51,835 not started reaching out to local 655 00:27:52,239 --> 00:27:53,240 agencies yet to see about the support. 656 00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:54,374 and 657 00:27:54,374 --> 00:27:55,242 I also just wanted to clarify. Currently 658 00:27:55,242 --> 00:27:57,242 out 659 00:27:57,244 --> 00:27:58,245 of all of the cagf recipients over 660 00:27:58,245 --> 00:28:00,245 the past years, 661 00:28:01,248 --> 00:28:04,251 what we did is these five listed here 662 00:28:04,251 --> 00:28:06,253 were the first rendition of 663 00:28:06,253 --> 00:28:09,253 service based providing three contract. 664 00:28:11,258 --> 00:28:13,260 so the level of invoicing is now coming 665 00:28:13,260 --> 00:28:16,263 in and they are paying for services 666 00:28:16,263 --> 00:28:18,663 rendered. Versus the traditional 667 00:28:19,233 --> 00:28:20,334 cagf program, including 668 00:28:20,334 --> 00:28:22,236 westside food bank. We have just been 669 00:28:22,236 --> 00:28:23,303 issuing the funds on a quarterly basis 670 00:28:23,303 --> 00:28:26,903 based on services they are providing. 671 00:28:28,242 --> 00:28:30,244 the goal would be to take 672 00:28:30,244 --> 00:28:31,245 some of these and turn them into a 673 00:28:31,245 --> 00:28:32,246 similar contract like we did with 674 00:28:32,246 --> 00:28:33,380 the 675 00:28:33,380 --> 00:28:34,248 initial five critical service providers. 676 00:28:34,248 --> 00:28:36,248 because they 677 00:28:37,251 --> 00:28:39,253 are not necessarily critical 678 00:28:39,253 --> 00:28:40,254 in the same fashion that we have called 679 00:28:40,254 --> 00:28:41,321 the others, we have 680 00:28:41,321 --> 00:28:44,921 deemed those to be community services 681 00:28:48,262 --> 00:28:49,263 partners. We would be transitioning, 682 00:28:49,263 --> 00:28:50,297 if this is supported, this next 683 00:28:50,297 --> 00:28:52,232 year into the model that you guys 684 00:28:52,232 --> 00:28:55,235 supported earlier this year for the first five. 685 00:28:55,235 --> 00:28:56,270 >> I understood 686 00:28:56,270 --> 00:28:58,238 that, that was clear in the report, 687 00:28:58,238 --> 00:28:59,239 that made sense. Thank you. But going 688 00:28:59,239 --> 00:29:00,307 back 689 00:29:00,307 --> 00:29:04,244 to my question, I think it would be 690 00:29:04,244 --> 00:29:06,246 interesting and nice to be able 691 00:29:06,246 --> 00:29:07,247 to, we want to be able to work together 692 00:29:07,247 --> 00:29:10,247 as a community. It would 693 00:29:10,250 --> 00:29:13,253 be a great way to ask our local grocers. 694 00:29:13,253 --> 00:29:16,256 I do not know if we have any 695 00:29:16,256 --> 00:29:18,656 besides beverly hills market, 696 00:29:19,259 --> 00:29:24,659 or whole foods, if they would be interested. Pavilion. 697 00:29:28,235 --> 00:29:30,237 >> -->> [ laughter ] I do 698 00:29:30,237 --> 00:29:31,238 not think that we could afford that. 699 00:29:31,238 --> 00:29:33,238 >> $15 700 00:29:34,241 --> 00:29:35,242 avocados that nobody buys. 701 00:29:35,242 --> 00:29:36,376 >> so, 702 00:29:36,376 --> 00:29:40,247 yeah, that way it is a strong partnership 703 00:29:40,247 --> 00:29:41,281 between 704 00:29:41,281 --> 00:29:43,250 our local businesses and supporting 705 00:29:43,250 --> 00:29:46,253 our neighborhoods and the needs of the residents. 706 00:29:46,253 --> 00:29:49,256 >> we would be happy to reach out 707 00:29:49,256 --> 00:29:52,259 and see if they are interested. 708 00:29:52,259 --> 00:29:55,262 >> thank you. There were four charities 709 00:29:55,262 --> 00:29:57,264 that I noticed that were cultural 710 00:29:57,264 --> 00:30:00,264 on the community service providers. 711 00:30:01,235 --> 00:30:03,237 and a few others that 712 00:30:03,237 --> 00:30:07,241 may be would even fall into that. 713 00:30:07,241 --> 00:30:09,241 >> 714 00:30:10,244 --> 00:30:11,245 [ inaudible ] 715 00:30:11,245 --> 00:30:12,246 >> yeah, 716 00:30:12,246 --> 00:30:16,250 so my question is, these are social 717 00:30:16,250 --> 00:30:19,253 services and those are cultural services, 718 00:30:19,253 --> 00:30:21,255 may be more appropriate for 719 00:30:21,255 --> 00:30:24,258 our arts and culture commission to look at. 720 00:30:24,258 --> 00:30:27,858 or something in the arts section. 721 00:30:28,262 --> 00:30:31,231 why are they lumped into social services? 722 00:30:31,231 --> 00:30:34,234 how does that justify? Can you explain that for me? 723 00:30:34,234 --> 00:30:37,234 >> so maybe five years ago 724 00:30:37,237 --> 00:30:39,239 , four years ago, I am 725 00:30:39,239 --> 00:30:40,240 trying to think now. They were embedded 726 00:30:40,240 --> 00:30:42,240 as part 727 00:30:43,243 --> 00:30:46,243 of the cagf program. At 728 00:30:46,246 --> 00:30:48,248 that time this was living 729 00:30:48,248 --> 00:30:52,252 with the human services division within community 730 00:30:52,252 --> 00:30:53,253 services and they incorporated this 731 00:30:53,253 --> 00:30:55,253 as part of 732 00:30:55,255 --> 00:30:57,257 their program. Happy to look at a 733 00:30:57,257 --> 00:31:01,261 process in which we pulled this apart 734 00:31:01,261 --> 00:31:02,262 and do the same sort of thing, take 735 00:31:02,262 --> 00:31:03,363 funding 736 00:31:03,363 --> 00:31:04,264 that has been allocated to this portion of 737 00:31:04,264 --> 00:31:06,264 the cagf 738 00:31:07,234 --> 00:31:09,234 program and make 739 00:31:10,237 --> 00:31:12,239 there be a new application and 740 00:31:12,239 --> 00:31:13,273 vetting process through the arts and 741 00:31:13,273 --> 00:31:14,241 culture commission, if that is the 742 00:31:14,241 --> 00:31:16,241 directive 743 00:31:16,243 --> 00:31:18,643 of the city council. 744 00:31:19,246 --> 00:31:21,248 >> would you be okay with that? Put 745 00:31:21,248 --> 00:31:22,249 your microphone on. 746 00:31:22,249 --> 00:31:23,250 >> there is not 747 00:31:23,250 --> 00:31:25,252 a separate budget for it. You look 748 00:31:25,252 --> 00:31:26,253 at the amounts, it is very small. 749 00:31:26,253 --> 00:31:28,253 I don't know 750 00:31:29,256 --> 00:31:30,257 that we necessarily want 751 00:31:30,257 --> 00:31:32,259 , you know, we may want to vet the 752 00:31:32,259 --> 00:31:34,261 cultural grants through the 753 00:31:34,261 --> 00:31:35,262 arts and culture commission, but I 754 00:31:35,262 --> 00:31:36,396 would not have 755 00:31:36,396 --> 00:31:41,196 them have a separate grant kind of thing. 756 00:31:41,235 --> 00:31:42,336 >> for example, I think 757 00:31:42,336 --> 00:31:46,240 the wallace already has a contract -- 758 00:31:46,240 --> 00:31:50,244 >> they get a lot more money than that 759 00:31:50,244 --> 00:31:51,245 from us, 760 00:31:51,245 --> 00:31:52,246 but they need a lot. 761 00:31:52,246 --> 00:31:53,247 >> right, but 762 00:31:53,247 --> 00:31:54,248 I do not know that it is 763 00:31:54,248 --> 00:31:55,282 necessary for them to be here and 764 00:31:55,282 --> 00:31:58,882 there. It is doubling up services 765 00:32:03,257 --> 00:32:05,259 that are already provided. Nancy, 766 00:32:05,259 --> 00:32:06,260 maybe you could speak to that. 767 00:32:06,260 --> 00:32:07,261 >> the only other option would be 768 00:32:07,261 --> 00:32:09,263 to give arts and culture a dedicated 769 00:32:09,263 --> 00:32:10,264 budget each year that they then recommend 770 00:32:10,264 --> 00:32:11,231 for cultural institutions. And if 771 00:32:11,231 --> 00:32:12,232 we 772 00:32:12,232 --> 00:32:14,234 did that, you know, I would not have 773 00:32:14,234 --> 00:32:15,302 a problem with that. 774 00:32:15,302 --> 00:32:17,237 but we need to ensure that they have 775 00:32:17,237 --> 00:32:18,438 some funding each year to be 776 00:32:18,438 --> 00:32:22,638 able to share with the cultural institutions. 777 00:32:23,243 --> 00:32:25,643 >> 40 grand or something, maybe. 778 00:32:26,246 --> 00:32:28,246 but I don't 779 00:32:29,249 --> 00:32:31,649 know, whatever the amount 780 00:32:34,254 --> 00:32:35,255 , we can talk about that when we budget. But 781 00:32:35,255 --> 00:32:36,256 I think this 782 00:32:36,256 --> 00:32:37,391 is the time to have the conversation 783 00:32:37,391 --> 00:32:40,991 to just discussed separating them. John? 784 00:32:41,261 --> 00:32:42,362 >> as 785 00:32:42,362 --> 00:32:44,264 long as they have a budget. You know, 786 00:32:44,264 --> 00:32:47,234 it is 85 now for those four, 787 00:32:47,234 --> 00:32:50,237 I would suggest 100 or more. I think culture, 788 00:32:50,237 --> 00:32:53,237 I think these, theater 40 is 789 00:32:53,240 --> 00:32:55,240 so extremely important. 790 00:32:56,243 --> 00:32:58,643 they are so dependent 791 00:32:59,246 --> 00:33:00,247 cagf 792 00:33:00,247 --> 00:33:01,248 no cultural institution makes back 793 00:33:01,248 --> 00:33:02,249 the money through the box office. 794 00:33:02,249 --> 00:33:03,250 it is just 795 00:33:03,250 --> 00:33:04,251 not possible these days. 796 00:33:04,251 --> 00:33:05,285 >> okay. 797 00:33:05,285 --> 00:33:06,253 but don't you think that would be 798 00:33:06,253 --> 00:33:08,253 more 799 00:33:08,255 --> 00:33:09,256 appropriate to have in the 800 00:33:09,256 --> 00:33:10,257 arts and culture commission? 801 00:33:10,257 --> 00:33:11,258 >> sure, 802 00:33:11,258 --> 00:33:13,260 if we could give them a budget. 803 00:33:13,260 --> 00:33:14,461 yes. 804 00:33:14,461 --> 00:33:17,264 >> we can talk about it at the meeting 805 00:33:17,264 --> 00:33:18,298 with some 806 00:33:18,298 --> 00:33:20,234 kind of funds in the next --because 807 00:33:20,234 --> 00:33:21,235 we are discussing budgeting now for 808 00:33:21,235 --> 00:33:22,269 the 809 00:33:22,269 --> 00:33:23,470 next agenda. So those would be our 810 00:33:23,470 --> 00:33:26,240 recommendation, to remove the cultural component's 811 00:33:26,240 --> 00:33:27,241 from here. 812 00:33:27,241 --> 00:33:29,241 >> but replacing them 813 00:33:29,243 --> 00:33:32,243 at the arts and culture 814 00:33:32,246 --> 00:33:33,247 commission with a dedicated budget. Right? 815 00:33:33,247 --> 00:33:35,247 >> yes. 816 00:33:35,249 --> 00:33:36,383 okay, 817 00:33:36,383 --> 00:33:41,783 let me see if I have any other questions. 818 00:33:44,258 --> 00:33:47,258 now, just out of curiosity 819 00:33:47,261 --> 00:33:49,261 , why are we 820 00:33:50,264 --> 00:33:52,264 not 821 00:33:53,233 --> 00:33:55,233 [ pause ] 822 00:33:59,239 --> 00:34:01,239 -- 823 00:34:02,242 --> 00:34:04,642 so because we are 824 00:34:05,245 --> 00:34:07,247 contracting some of these major 825 00:34:07,247 --> 00:34:08,248 asks, would it not make more sense 826 00:34:08,248 --> 00:34:10,248 for 827 00:34:11,251 --> 00:34:13,651 some of the larger 828 00:34:14,254 --> 00:34:16,256 grants that we have here to also use 829 00:34:16,256 --> 00:34:19,259 those as a contract to see how it would 830 00:34:19,259 --> 00:34:22,262 work? Or is this temporary? What was the 831 00:34:22,262 --> 00:34:23,263 process to make the decision that 832 00:34:23,263 --> 00:34:25,663 these five would be 833 00:34:26,233 --> 00:34:29,236 contracted, versus the others getting a straight out 834 00:34:29,236 --> 00:34:31,236 grant? 835 00:34:35,242 --> 00:34:37,642 >> so I think, just 836 00:34:38,245 --> 00:34:40,245 to sort of 837 00:34:41,248 --> 00:34:44,248 , I guess take a step 838 00:34:46,253 --> 00:34:47,254 back, so I think where we will end 839 00:34:47,254 --> 00:34:48,288 up, if I understand correctly 840 00:34:48,288 --> 00:34:50,257 with the report today, groups will 841 00:34:50,257 --> 00:34:53,257 either be put on hiatus, 842 00:34:53,260 --> 00:34:56,263 or they will be put on contract. 843 00:34:56,263 --> 00:34:58,232 >> correct. >> we 844 00:34:58,232 --> 00:34:59,233 would not just be saying we think 845 00:34:59,233 --> 00:35:00,234 you are 846 00:35:00,234 --> 00:35:02,236 a valuable organization and we are 847 00:35:02,236 --> 00:35:05,236 going to give you a 848 00:35:05,239 --> 00:35:07,639 check, regardless of whether 849 00:35:08,242 --> 00:35:10,642 you serve our residents 850 00:35:11,245 --> 00:35:12,246 or any of those things. We would be 851 00:35:12,246 --> 00:35:14,246 moving 852 00:35:14,248 --> 00:35:16,250 everyone into a contract -- 853 00:35:16,250 --> 00:35:17,251 >> that is not clear here. Here it 854 00:35:17,251 --> 00:35:19,253 says on attachment b 855 00:35:19,253 --> 00:35:22,853 that there is 11 items, community service 856 00:35:23,257 --> 00:35:24,291 providers. So we are 857 00:35:24,291 --> 00:35:26,260 putting all of them on contract as 858 00:35:26,260 --> 00:35:30,460 well? You are saying yes or no? 859 00:35:35,235 --> 00:35:37,235 >> yes, that 860 00:35:37,237 --> 00:35:38,372 is what we would be saying. If you 861 00:35:38,372 --> 00:35:39,239 look at attachment b, community service 862 00:35:39,239 --> 00:35:40,274 providers, 863 00:35:40,274 --> 00:35:41,308 minus the cultural ones at this point, 864 00:35:41,308 --> 00:35:42,242 is the recommendation. The remaining 865 00:35:42,242 --> 00:35:43,610 would move over 866 00:35:43,610 --> 00:35:47,247 to mirror the way we started with the critical service 867 00:35:47,247 --> 00:35:48,248 providers. These would 868 00:35:48,248 --> 00:35:50,250 be contractually based agreements 869 00:35:50,250 --> 00:35:55,500 for services rendered is what is paid for. 870 00:35:56,256 --> 00:35:58,258 >> now I will say we are working through 871 00:35:58,258 --> 00:35:59,259 a little bit of what we mean by services 872 00:35:59,259 --> 00:36:01,261 rendered with some organizations. 873 00:36:01,261 --> 00:36:02,262 so we would have to, like the folks 874 00:36:02,262 --> 00:36:04,662 did with the other 875 00:36:05,232 --> 00:36:06,233 organizations, work out what the reporting 876 00:36:06,233 --> 00:36:08,233 would look like 877 00:36:08,235 --> 00:36:10,237 and the invoicing, so that 878 00:36:10,237 --> 00:36:11,238 we know what we are being charged for. 879 00:36:11,238 --> 00:36:13,238 >> 880 00:36:17,244 --> 00:36:18,245 all of these items are going to be contracted. 881 00:36:18,245 --> 00:36:19,246 >> 882 00:36:19,246 --> 00:36:20,247 the five previous. Yes . And the 11 883 00:36:20,247 --> 00:36:22,247 would be contracted. 884 00:36:26,253 --> 00:36:28,255 the others would be put on 885 00:36:28,255 --> 00:36:29,256 hiatus. 886 00:36:29,256 --> 00:36:30,257 >> right, correct. So that 887 00:36:30,257 --> 00:36:32,259 is what I was 888 00:36:32,259 --> 00:36:34,261 saying. The hiatus ones, people 889 00:36:34,261 --> 00:36:38,232 are used to getting the same amount each year, 890 00:36:38,232 --> 00:36:40,234 a little bit more 891 00:36:40,234 --> 00:36:41,301 they ask for. And when they don't 892 00:36:41,301 --> 00:36:42,236 they will probably be upset. I think 893 00:36:42,236 --> 00:36:44,236 that 894 00:36:44,238 --> 00:36:46,240 is why they are bringing it to us 895 00:36:46,240 --> 00:36:47,241 now. We will be prepared, if they 896 00:36:47,241 --> 00:36:48,408 want to make an argument as to why 897 00:36:48,408 --> 00:36:50,244 they should continue, again understanding 898 00:36:50,244 --> 00:36:53,247 that they all do great work, we are 899 00:36:53,247 --> 00:36:55,647 insisting that it be 900 00:36:56,250 --> 00:36:57,317 tied 901 00:36:57,317 --> 00:36:59,253 to our residents with services. They 902 00:36:59,253 --> 00:37:01,255 will have to then come and explain either 903 00:37:01,255 --> 00:37:02,256 why they already do serve the residents 904 00:37:02,256 --> 00:37:05,259 in the figures do not reflect 905 00:37:05,259 --> 00:37:07,259 it. Or 906 00:37:07,261 --> 00:37:13,233 what they will do to ensure we are getting that 907 00:37:13,233 --> 00:37:14,468 value for life. 908 00:37:14,468 --> 00:37:16,236 >> and this was under which commission? 909 00:37:16,236 --> 00:37:17,237 >> human relations commission. >> 910 00:37:17,237 --> 00:37:19,637 okay. My other thought 911 00:37:20,240 --> 00:37:21,408 is that we have 912 00:37:21,408 --> 00:37:23,243 a commission for charitable contributions 913 00:37:23,243 --> 00:37:25,243 . 914 00:37:27,247 --> 00:37:29,247 with they 915 00:37:30,250 --> 00:37:31,285 be able to, would we be 916 00:37:31,285 --> 00:37:36,685 able to put all of this into that box? 917 00:37:37,257 --> 00:37:39,259 and is it a commission or a foundation? 918 00:37:39,259 --> 00:37:41,259 >> 919 00:37:41,261 --> 00:37:42,262 it is a foundation. 920 00:37:42,262 --> 00:37:45,232 >> so not as it is 921 00:37:45,232 --> 00:37:46,266 currently 922 00:37:46,266 --> 00:37:47,234 configured today is the answer. We 923 00:37:47,234 --> 00:37:48,235 are talking about the beverly hills 924 00:37:48,235 --> 00:37:50,635 community charitable foundation. This 925 00:37:53,240 --> 00:37:54,241 is essentially a separate arm of the 926 00:37:54,241 --> 00:37:56,241 city, it 927 00:37:57,244 --> 00:37:58,412 is its own 501 c3 with its own 928 00:37:58,412 --> 00:38:01,248 board that can accept donations from whomever. 929 00:38:01,248 --> 00:38:04,848 to benefit city programs. The current 930 00:38:06,253 --> 00:38:07,421 structure of the community 931 00:38:07,421 --> 00:38:09,256 charitable foundation is to take in money. 932 00:38:09,256 --> 00:38:11,256 accept 933 00:38:12,259 --> 00:38:14,259 it. 934 00:38:15,262 --> 00:38:16,263 and then essentially transfer it to 935 00:38:16,263 --> 00:38:20,234 the city. The city then cuts the check. 936 00:38:20,234 --> 00:38:24,434 or the city does the bidding, procurement. 937 00:38:26,240 --> 00:38:27,241 the community charitable foundation 938 00:38:27,241 --> 00:38:28,242 as 939 00:38:28,242 --> 00:38:30,244 of today does not have the ability 940 00:38:30,244 --> 00:38:31,245 to write checks, does not have a treasurer. 941 00:38:31,245 --> 00:38:33,247 I guess it has a treasurer but does 942 00:38:33,247 --> 00:38:36,247 not have --I am sorry. 943 00:38:36,250 --> 00:38:39,850 I apologize. As a board. Yes. 944 00:38:42,256 --> 00:38:43,257 >> I am just trying to figure 945 00:38:43,257 --> 00:38:45,259 out ways we can utilize it. I know 946 00:38:45,259 --> 00:38:47,261 that it may not be structured today. 947 00:38:47,261 --> 00:38:48,262 but I think that is also an area that 948 00:38:48,262 --> 00:38:49,396 I would 949 00:38:49,396 --> 00:38:53,233 recommend revisiting or visiting to begin with. 950 00:38:53,233 --> 00:38:57,237 and then see if that portion of it, because it this 951 00:38:57,237 --> 00:38:59,237 point our 952 00:38:59,239 --> 00:39:00,240 charitable commission, where is that right now? 953 00:39:00,240 --> 00:39:02,240 >> 954 00:39:03,243 --> 00:39:04,244 charitable solicitations commission 955 00:39:04,244 --> 00:39:06,246 is the commission that has been in 956 00:39:06,246 --> 00:39:09,246 existence since the 40s. And 957 00:39:09,249 --> 00:39:11,249 they have 958 00:39:11,251 --> 00:39:15,255 a few things that they are responsible for. 959 00:39:15,255 --> 00:39:16,590 but they 960 00:39:16,590 --> 00:39:18,258 sort of vet organizations that are doing fundraising 961 00:39:18,258 --> 00:39:20,258 membership drives and 962 00:39:21,261 --> 00:39:23,261 something else. 963 00:39:24,264 --> 00:39:27,234 how their funding is spent. 964 00:39:27,234 --> 00:39:29,234 at this time 965 00:39:30,237 --> 00:39:32,239 a lot of the information 966 00:39:32,239 --> 00:39:36,243 that was not available in the 1940s, 967 00:39:36,243 --> 00:39:39,246 postwar fundraising, is now available online. 968 00:39:39,246 --> 00:39:41,246 you can find 969 00:39:41,248 --> 00:39:45,252 form 990 on the irs website and such. 970 00:39:45,252 --> 00:39:48,255 not to say we are not concerned 971 00:39:48,255 --> 00:39:50,655 about ensuring the people 972 00:39:51,258 --> 00:39:52,259 who are raising funds in our community 973 00:39:52,259 --> 00:39:53,393 are legitimate 974 00:39:53,393 --> 00:39:54,261 and using the funds for proper purpose. 975 00:39:54,261 --> 00:39:56,661 so we would still 976 00:39:57,264 --> 00:39:58,232 issue 977 00:39:58,232 --> 00:39:59,233 charitable solicitation permits. But 978 00:39:59,233 --> 00:40:00,234 as far as a commission and all of 979 00:40:00,234 --> 00:40:01,535 the overhead 980 00:40:01,535 --> 00:40:06,335 that goes with the commission, overseeing that process, 981 00:40:11,245 --> 00:40:12,246 we will be sunsetting that commission. 982 00:40:12,246 --> 00:40:14,248 >> and this was under 983 00:40:14,248 --> 00:40:15,249 their approval. That is why I am suggesting 984 00:40:15,249 --> 00:40:18,249 that there be some oversights 985 00:40:18,252 --> 00:40:21,255 to make sure that there is 986 00:40:21,255 --> 00:40:23,255 some balance, 987 00:40:24,258 --> 00:40:27,858 that there is some kind of 988 00:40:29,263 --> 00:40:30,264 --instead of a commission there is 989 00:40:30,264 --> 00:40:32,232 also community members 990 00:40:32,232 --> 00:40:37,320 on that committee. To just kind of assist 991 00:40:42,242 --> 00:40:43,243 the community with 992 00:40:43,243 --> 00:40:44,244 the process. 993 00:40:44,244 --> 00:40:45,279 >> okay. We understand 994 00:40:45,279 --> 00:40:47,247 the concept. We are not set up to 995 00:40:47,247 --> 00:40:48,248 do it today but it is something we 996 00:40:48,248 --> 00:40:49,249 can work towards. 997 00:40:49,249 --> 00:40:50,250 >> no. I just 998 00:40:50,250 --> 00:40:51,251 wanted to put it on your radar. I 999 00:40:51,251 --> 00:40:52,319 think it would be a good balance 1000 00:40:52,319 --> 00:40:53,387 based on the decisions made regarding 1001 00:40:53,387 --> 00:40:55,787 the charitable solicitation commission. 1002 00:40:56,256 --> 00:40:57,257 all right. So those are my questions. 1003 00:40:57,257 --> 00:41:00,257 do you have any others? 1004 00:41:02,262 --> 00:41:03,263 >> no. I think this is a bit of a 1005 00:41:03,263 --> 00:41:05,232 major move where we have 1006 00:41:05,232 --> 00:41:09,236 so many organizations that have been getting 1007 00:41:09,236 --> 00:41:11,238 funding and have been doing good 1008 00:41:11,238 --> 00:41:12,239 work. But I guess it is to focus on 1009 00:41:12,239 --> 00:41:14,639 the residents, they just 1010 00:41:15,242 --> 00:41:17,244 have not been providing that. 1011 00:41:17,244 --> 00:41:18,245 I would absolutely set something up 1012 00:41:18,245 --> 00:41:21,245 to allow them to respond, 1013 00:41:21,248 --> 00:41:23,250 to make their arguments. 1014 00:41:23,250 --> 00:41:24,251 it again, lay it on the line. We love 1015 00:41:24,251 --> 00:41:26,651 the work you do, 1016 00:41:27,254 --> 00:41:29,254 unfortunately your facilities 1017 00:41:30,257 --> 00:41:33,260 are not buying used by our 1018 00:41:33,260 --> 00:41:34,261 residents and therefore that is the 1019 00:41:34,261 --> 00:41:35,362 basis of our 1020 00:41:35,362 --> 00:41:36,263 judgment. We have to allocate resources 1021 00:41:36,263 --> 00:41:37,364 to 1022 00:41:37,364 --> 00:41:40,964 services that our residents are using. 1023 00:41:42,236 --> 00:41:43,270 I think being very straight 1024 00:41:43,270 --> 00:41:45,239 about that but having the ability 1025 00:41:45,239 --> 00:41:47,241 for them to come to us and talk 1026 00:41:47,241 --> 00:41:48,242 to us, that is fine. There is time. 1027 00:41:48,242 --> 00:41:50,242 and I 1028 00:41:50,244 --> 00:41:54,248 like the suggestion to give funding to 1029 00:41:54,248 --> 00:41:57,248 the arts and culture commission, 1030 00:41:57,251 --> 00:41:59,651 to allow them to 1031 00:42:00,254 --> 00:42:03,854 separately give grants to cultural institutions. 1032 00:42:06,260 --> 00:42:07,261 >> I don't know if we would do a whole 1033 00:42:07,261 --> 00:42:08,529 process 1034 00:42:08,529 --> 00:42:15,129 that they would come to us. I think that I would 1035 00:42:15,235 --> 00:42:16,236 -- 1036 00:42:16,236 --> 00:42:17,237 >> there is public 1037 00:42:17,237 --> 00:42:18,238 comment. And they have come to us 1038 00:42:18,238 --> 00:42:20,240 in the past when we have said sorry, 1039 00:42:20,240 --> 00:42:21,241 no. We have to expect that. They are 1040 00:42:21,241 --> 00:42:23,243 allowed to do that. But 1041 00:42:23,243 --> 00:42:24,311 I would actually, to save them time 1042 00:42:24,311 --> 00:42:26,246 and whatever, I would lay it on the 1043 00:42:26,246 --> 00:42:27,247 line. This is what we are looking 1044 00:42:27,247 --> 00:42:30,250 for. And you only have 10% of 1045 00:42:30,250 --> 00:42:31,251 the money we are giving you going 1046 00:42:31,251 --> 00:42:33,251 to our residents. 1047 00:42:33,253 --> 00:42:36,853 that is just not an efficient 1048 00:42:41,261 --> 00:42:42,262 allocation of resources. 1049 00:42:42,262 --> 00:42:43,263 >> I want 1050 00:42:43,263 --> 00:42:44,264 to just add that part 1051 00:42:44,264 --> 00:42:45,232 of the, like a six month long cagf 1052 00:42:45,232 --> 00:42:46,233 process, echoes through the early, 1053 00:42:46,233 --> 00:42:48,233 late 1054 00:42:48,235 --> 00:42:51,238 winter, early spring. We do get an ad hoc of 1055 00:42:51,238 --> 00:42:53,238 two commission members 1056 00:42:53,240 --> 00:42:54,241 entered will commission members that join the 1057 00:42:54,241 --> 00:42:56,241 human 1058 00:42:57,244 --> 00:42:58,245 services staff to conduct interviews 1059 00:42:58,245 --> 00:43:00,645 with all new applicants 1060 00:43:03,250 --> 00:43:05,252 , as well as any applicant that was 1061 00:43:05,252 --> 00:43:06,353 existing and maybe we have questions 1062 00:43:06,353 --> 00:43:07,254 about or would like to see performance 1063 00:43:07,254 --> 00:43:08,388 change or 1064 00:43:08,388 --> 00:43:12,588 that we had questions about their data. 1065 00:43:15,262 --> 00:43:16,263 we have been thinking about this and 1066 00:43:16,263 --> 00:43:17,264 hearing the commissioners 1067 00:43:17,264 --> 00:43:18,232 over the past two years talk about 1068 00:43:18,232 --> 00:43:19,233 wanting to bring the impact directly 1069 00:43:19,233 --> 00:43:20,234 to 1070 00:43:20,234 --> 00:43:22,236 beverly hills residents. Those were 1071 00:43:22,236 --> 00:43:23,337 some of the 1072 00:43:23,337 --> 00:43:28,137 questions we asked. I hate to pick on 1073 00:43:28,242 --> 00:43:30,244 an organization, but as 1074 00:43:30,244 --> 00:43:31,245 an example safe parking l.a., last 1075 00:43:31,245 --> 00:43:32,246 year they 1076 00:43:32,246 --> 00:43:34,248 were funded for $50,000. This year 1077 00:43:34,248 --> 00:43:36,648 they were funded for $10,000. 1078 00:43:40,254 --> 00:43:41,288 when we met with them in the 1079 00:43:41,288 --> 00:43:42,289 spring, we said look, you have not 1080 00:43:42,289 --> 00:43:43,257 provided us with data that shows x 1081 00:43:43,257 --> 00:43:44,391 amount 1082 00:43:44,391 --> 00:43:46,260 of vehicles that were parked in beverly 1083 00:43:46,260 --> 00:43:48,260 hills with 1084 00:43:49,263 --> 00:43:51,231 someone unhoused living in them 1085 00:43:51,231 --> 00:43:52,232 and then went to one of your parking 1086 00:43:52,232 --> 00:43:53,233 lots. 1087 00:43:53,233 --> 00:43:54,234 >> that is 1088 00:43:54,234 --> 00:43:55,235 because it is pointless. We have ordinances 1089 00:43:55,235 --> 00:43:56,236 in place that there is no overnight 1090 00:43:56,236 --> 00:43:57,237 parking in our city. 1091 00:43:57,237 --> 00:43:59,237 >> absolutely. 1092 00:44:03,243 --> 00:44:04,244 but there are still folks that might 1093 00:44:04,244 --> 00:44:05,245 parked here during 1094 00:44:05,245 --> 00:44:07,247 the day and then park in front of 1095 00:44:07,247 --> 00:44:08,382 a park in a park ranger 1096 00:44:08,382 --> 00:44:10,250 can see that they are back, the backseat 1097 00:44:10,250 --> 00:44:13,250 is completely full of personal 1098 00:44:13,253 --> 00:44:15,653 belongings. That would be 1099 00:44:16,256 --> 00:44:17,291 a recommendation. If you 1100 00:44:17,291 --> 00:44:19,259 do not want to dispose of your vehicle 1101 00:44:19,259 --> 00:44:20,260 and come inside to a shelter, 1102 00:44:20,260 --> 00:44:21,395 you could go there. When we pressed 1103 00:44:21,395 --> 00:44:24,264 safe parking, we asked how many vehicles, 1104 00:44:24,264 --> 00:44:25,232 it was exactly the answer that we 1105 00:44:25,232 --> 00:44:26,233 knew it would 1106 00:44:26,233 --> 00:44:31,330 be, which was zero. They say but we 1107 00:44:33,240 --> 00:44:34,241 service hundreds of people from spa 1108 00:44:34,241 --> 00:44:35,275 5, that 1109 00:44:35,275 --> 00:44:37,244 includes l.a., santa monica, culver 1110 00:44:37,244 --> 00:44:40,247 city, and unincorporated areas. None of those from 1111 00:44:40,247 --> 00:44:42,247 beverly hills. 1112 00:44:43,250 --> 00:44:45,252 I say this to say that 1113 00:44:45,252 --> 00:44:46,253 from staff and commission's perspective, 1114 00:44:46,253 --> 00:44:48,253 we 1115 00:44:49,256 --> 00:44:51,258 were driving the organizations 1116 00:44:51,258 --> 00:44:52,259 to provide the data in the spring. 1117 00:44:52,259 --> 00:44:53,260 those that were 1118 00:44:53,260 --> 00:44:55,262 able to provide compelling data are 1119 00:44:55,262 --> 00:44:57,264 on the list that is recommended 1120 00:44:57,264 --> 00:44:58,232 to be contracted for. And those that 1121 00:44:58,232 --> 00:44:59,233 could not provide data 1122 00:44:59,233 --> 00:45:02,833 or could only speak to generalities 1123 00:45:04,238 --> 00:45:05,372 -- 1124 00:45:05,372 --> 00:45:07,241 >> that is fine. You will tell them 1125 00:45:07,241 --> 00:45:10,241 that they are on hiatus, 1126 00:45:10,244 --> 00:45:12,644 they will say geez, 1127 00:45:13,247 --> 00:45:14,248 they know that they 1128 00:45:14,248 --> 00:45:15,249 can come to us if they want. 1129 00:45:15,249 --> 00:45:16,250 >> I 1130 00:45:16,250 --> 00:45:17,317 support the staff decision. It looks 1131 00:45:17,317 --> 00:45:18,285 like you have done your due diligence 1132 00:45:18,285 --> 00:45:19,253 and have asked those questions. And 1133 00:45:19,253 --> 00:45:20,254 that 1134 00:45:20,254 --> 00:45:21,255 is why these recommendations were 1135 00:45:21,255 --> 00:45:22,256 made in the first place. With regard 1136 00:45:22,256 --> 00:45:24,256 to decreasing it 1137 00:45:25,259 --> 00:45:27,259 from 50, to 10. So 1138 00:45:27,261 --> 00:45:28,262 that was kind of a here, we are letting 1139 00:45:28,262 --> 00:45:29,263 you 1140 00:45:29,263 --> 00:45:34,663 know, we will still give you a little bit 1141 00:45:36,236 --> 00:45:37,237 more. But I support the staff's decision 1142 00:45:37,237 --> 00:45:38,405 on that. The only thing 1143 00:45:38,405 --> 00:45:40,240 that I was going to recommend additionally 1144 00:45:40,240 --> 00:45:43,243 when I was listening, on your application 1145 00:45:43,243 --> 00:45:45,243 , 1146 00:45:46,246 --> 00:45:47,247 formally 1147 00:45:47,247 --> 00:45:49,249 there should be a place that says 1148 00:45:49,249 --> 00:45:52,849 how were the funds used? Was 1149 00:45:54,254 --> 00:45:55,255 it for what you described in the first 1150 00:45:55,255 --> 00:45:56,256 place? What 1151 00:45:56,256 --> 00:45:58,258 percentage of the funds were used? 1152 00:45:58,258 --> 00:46:01,261 a lot of times organizations do not use 1153 00:46:01,261 --> 00:46:03,263 all of the funding. 1154 00:46:03,263 --> 00:46:06,233 that is good for us to know as well. 1155 00:46:06,233 --> 00:46:07,234 and, you know, what percentage of 1156 00:46:07,234 --> 00:46:09,234 it 1157 00:46:09,236 --> 00:46:13,240 was used for the city of beverly hills residents specifically. 1158 00:46:13,240 --> 00:46:16,243 so I am sure that you 1159 00:46:16,243 --> 00:46:19,243 have that but just to 1160 00:46:19,246 --> 00:46:21,248 clarify and make sure. You could also 1161 00:46:21,248 --> 00:46:22,249 look at the form that the beverly 1162 00:46:22,249 --> 00:46:24,251 hills rotary club has. 1163 00:46:24,251 --> 00:46:28,255 a lot of the questions for their grants 1164 00:46:28,255 --> 00:46:30,257 that they offer for repeat 1165 00:46:30,257 --> 00:46:33,260 groups have a lot of those questions on 1166 00:46:33,260 --> 00:46:36,263 it, just to clarify and make sure 1167 00:46:36,263 --> 00:46:37,264 that the money went where it was supposed 1168 00:46:37,264 --> 00:46:38,232 to go in 1169 00:46:38,232 --> 00:46:40,234 spent how they said it was going to 1170 00:46:40,234 --> 00:46:43,234 be spent. In the utilized 1171 00:46:43,237 --> 00:46:46,837 all the money that was spent 1172 00:46:48,242 --> 00:46:49,243 that we provided. What do you do if 1173 00:46:49,243 --> 00:46:52,243 someone says I did not 1174 00:46:52,246 --> 00:46:54,646 use all of the 1175 00:46:55,249 --> 00:46:56,250 , where 1176 00:46:56,250 --> 00:46:57,251 does it go? 1177 00:46:57,251 --> 00:46:58,318 >> the current process 1178 00:46:58,318 --> 00:46:59,319 where it is grant funding, there is 1179 00:46:59,319 --> 00:47:01,255 absolutely nothing we can do if they 1180 00:47:01,255 --> 00:47:02,256 are not using it directly for services. 1181 00:47:02,256 --> 00:47:03,257 >> 1182 00:47:03,257 --> 00:47:04,424 but that is taxpayer dollars that 1183 00:47:04,424 --> 00:47:07,261 were not utilized in the way that we originally 1184 00:47:07,261 --> 00:47:08,262 -- 1185 00:47:08,262 --> 00:47:09,329 >> have you 1186 00:47:09,329 --> 00:47:10,297 let them know they will be on hiatus? 1187 00:47:10,297 --> 00:47:12,232 >> not yet. >> okay. Once you 1188 00:47:12,232 --> 00:47:13,233 do some of them, again, these are 1189 00:47:13,233 --> 00:47:14,234 public meetings and anyone can come 1190 00:47:14,234 --> 00:47:15,235 and 1191 00:47:15,235 --> 00:47:16,236 speak and ask, and they can. But if 1192 00:47:16,236 --> 00:47:18,236 they 1193 00:47:19,239 --> 00:47:21,239 want [ pause ] 1194 00:47:22,242 --> 00:47:23,243 if they want 1195 00:47:23,243 --> 00:47:25,245 to be heard or taken seriously or 1196 00:47:25,245 --> 00:47:27,247 have any hope for a change, they are 1197 00:47:27,247 --> 00:47:28,248 going to have to answer those questions 1198 00:47:28,248 --> 00:47:30,648 and have to say 1199 00:47:31,251 --> 00:47:36,256 , either give a plan or say that the figures are 1200 00:47:36,256 --> 00:47:37,257 incorrect, or something. I will agree 1201 00:47:37,257 --> 00:47:39,259 with the vice mayor. I think it 1202 00:47:39,259 --> 00:47:43,263 behooves you to let these people know 1203 00:47:43,263 --> 00:47:44,331 , unless it needs to go to the 1204 00:47:44,331 --> 00:47:46,233 council first. But probably not. That 1205 00:47:46,233 --> 00:47:49,236 they will be put on hiatus. 1206 00:47:49,236 --> 00:47:51,238 now. Soon. So they can, 1207 00:47:51,238 --> 00:47:52,239 if they want to, either respond or 1208 00:47:52,239 --> 00:47:54,639 not. I would get 1209 00:47:57,244 --> 00:47:58,245 that taken care of soon. 1210 00:47:58,245 --> 00:47:59,246 >> we absolutely 1211 00:47:59,246 --> 00:48:01,246 will councilmember. And 1212 00:48:01,248 --> 00:48:04,251 with the timing it will give them the opportunity to 1213 00:48:04,251 --> 00:48:07,254 make their case or reach out. 1214 00:48:07,254 --> 00:48:10,257 may I ask a clarifying question? 1215 00:48:10,257 --> 00:48:13,260 so, what I heard was that 1216 00:48:13,260 --> 00:48:14,294 we are interested in 1217 00:48:14,294 --> 00:48:17,894 moving the arts and culture grant 1218 00:48:19,233 --> 00:48:22,236 funding to the arts and culture commission. 1219 00:48:22,236 --> 00:48:24,236 I 1220 00:48:24,238 --> 00:48:25,239 just want to clarify that we still 1221 00:48:25,239 --> 00:48:27,241 intend for that funding to be 1222 00:48:27,241 --> 00:48:31,245 used for the grant program. Is that correct? 1223 00:48:31,245 --> 00:48:34,245 >> oh, oh! Otherwise it was 1224 00:48:34,248 --> 00:48:37,248 going to be a [ pause ] 1225 00:48:37,251 --> 00:48:40,851 I need to think about that. 1226 00:48:43,257 --> 00:48:45,257 >> as 1227 00:48:45,259 --> 00:48:46,260 opposed to what? Yes, it would be 1228 00:48:46,260 --> 00:48:47,361 used. 1229 00:48:47,361 --> 00:48:48,362 >> no. We were going to recommend 1230 00:48:48,362 --> 00:48:49,263 for them to be contractual. As opposed 1231 00:48:49,263 --> 00:48:51,663 to grants. Is that 1232 00:48:52,232 --> 00:48:54,234 what you are saying? 1233 00:48:54,234 --> 00:48:55,235 >> it is actually a two-part question. 1234 00:48:55,235 --> 00:48:58,235 yes, we were intending for 1235 00:48:58,238 --> 00:49:00,240 them to become contractual. So what 1236 00:49:00,240 --> 00:49:04,244 I was saying earlier was still working through some 1237 00:49:04,244 --> 00:49:07,247 of what the reporting will look 1238 00:49:07,247 --> 00:49:10,250 like. So, how much do we give 1239 00:49:10,250 --> 00:49:12,250 to theater 40? 50,000? 1240 00:49:15,255 --> 00:49:16,256 >> 50,000. >> I am sure that the seizing 1241 00:49:16,256 --> 00:49:18,258 costs more than 50,000. Right? We 1242 00:49:18,258 --> 00:49:19,259 have to think through what that would 1243 00:49:19,259 --> 00:49:22,259 look like. But the intention 1244 00:49:22,262 --> 00:49:25,232 here was to move those four organizations into a contractual 1245 00:49:25,232 --> 00:49:27,232 basis. So 1246 00:49:29,236 --> 00:49:31,238 that is question one. 1247 00:49:31,238 --> 00:49:34,241 >> I would support a contractual service. Adjust, 1248 00:49:34,241 --> 00:49:35,242 I do not know if it will make more 1249 00:49:35,242 --> 00:49:37,242 work or 1250 00:49:38,245 --> 00:49:40,645 if it would help 1251 00:49:41,248 --> 00:49:43,250 . I just thought if something is 1252 00:49:43,250 --> 00:49:46,850 cultural, arts and culture, it should 1253 00:49:47,254 --> 00:49:49,256 be in that division. 1254 00:49:49,256 --> 00:49:50,257 but if it is too complicated and easier 1255 00:49:50,257 --> 00:49:51,258 to 1256 00:49:51,258 --> 00:49:53,260 have it all in one place, I am fine 1257 00:49:53,260 --> 00:49:55,660 with putting it in 1258 00:49:56,263 --> 00:49:59,233 . I think it is fine to make all 1259 00:49:59,233 --> 00:50:00,467 of these contractual right now. 1260 00:50:00,467 --> 00:50:02,236 >> yes, and that is entirely, you know, 1261 00:50:02,236 --> 00:50:03,470 we will do 1262 00:50:03,470 --> 00:50:08,242 whatever it is that the council would like to do. 1263 00:50:08,242 --> 00:50:11,242 so it is a question 1264 00:50:11,245 --> 00:50:12,246 to you. If that is 1265 00:50:12,246 --> 00:50:13,313 the case, if we want to make them 1266 00:50:13,313 --> 00:50:16,913 contractual, then I don't know that 1267 00:50:19,253 --> 00:50:20,254 there would be a role for arts and 1268 00:50:20,254 --> 00:50:21,255 culture. 1269 00:50:21,255 --> 00:50:22,289 >> you 1270 00:50:22,289 --> 00:50:23,257 are right. I didn't -- again, this 1271 00:50:23,257 --> 00:50:24,391 was 1272 00:50:24,391 --> 00:50:27,261 before I realized that all were becoming 1273 00:50:27,261 --> 00:50:29,263 contractual. In that case I would 1274 00:50:29,263 --> 00:50:32,232 keep it where it is. 1275 00:50:32,232 --> 00:50:34,232 and 1276 00:50:34,234 --> 00:50:37,237 let's try it and see how it goes this 1277 00:50:37,237 --> 00:50:38,238 year with that process. 1278 00:50:38,238 --> 00:50:39,239 >> we will 1279 00:50:39,239 --> 00:50:40,340 still move it to 1280 00:50:40,340 --> 00:50:42,242 community services, which is where the 1281 00:50:42,242 --> 00:50:45,842 arts and culture funding , the larger 1282 00:50:47,247 --> 00:50:49,249 program for the city 1283 00:50:49,249 --> 00:50:50,250 is located. But they would be contractual 1284 00:50:50,250 --> 00:50:52,250 just under community 1285 00:50:53,253 --> 00:50:55,653 services, then under fire. 1286 00:50:56,256 --> 00:50:58,656 >> well, would you agree 1287 00:50:59,259 --> 00:51:00,260 with that? 1288 00:51:00,260 --> 00:51:01,361 >> yes. Yes. >> I just 1289 00:51:01,361 --> 00:51:02,262 think that we are providing services, 1290 00:51:02,262 --> 00:51:03,263 I mean 1291 00:51:03,263 --> 00:51:05,232 this is a beautiful service to give 1292 00:51:05,232 --> 00:51:07,232 arts and culture 1293 00:51:08,235 --> 00:51:09,336 to the community, but I 1294 00:51:09,336 --> 00:51:12,936 think we have different budgeting issues. 1295 00:51:14,241 --> 00:51:15,342 like set aside for that. 1296 00:51:15,342 --> 00:51:17,244 >> yes. Okay. That is helpful. To 1297 00:51:17,244 --> 00:51:18,245 I. 1298 00:51:18,245 --> 00:51:20,247 >> thank you for clarifying. 1299 00:51:20,247 --> 00:51:21,248 that 1300 00:51:21,248 --> 00:51:22,249 was helpful. Anything else from you, 1301 00:51:22,249 --> 00:51:26,253 sir? Okay. Thank you for being here. 1302 00:51:26,253 --> 00:51:29,253 and the meeting is adjourned.