[1:20] Heat. Heat. N.
[6:18] I just
[6:35] Welcome to Boulder City City Council.
[6:37] Appreciate everybody being here and
[6:39] those who are tuning in. Call the
[6:42] meeting to order. Madame City Clerk,
[6:44] roll call and posting, please.
[6:47] >> Thank you. The agenda was posted in
[6:49] » Thank you. The agenda was posted in
[6:49] accordance with Nevada open meeting law
[6:50] and all members are present.
[6:52] >> Thank you. We will start with an
[6:54] » Thank you. We will start with an
[6:54] invocation by Elder Mark Wells from the
[6:57] Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday
[6:59] Saints after which we'll remain standing
[7:01] for the pledge of allegiance. Elder
[7:03] Wells, please.
[7:11] Our kind and gracious eternal heavenly
[7:13] father, we give thee thanks this evening
[7:17] for this opportunity we have to
[7:21] attend this city council meeting. We're
[7:23] grateful for our mayor and our city
[7:26] council individuals and for the Boulder
[7:30] City administrative staff for their
[7:32] dedication, integrity, and hard work on
[7:35] our behalf. We give thee thanks for our
[7:38] freedoms we enjoy in this country.
[7:40] especially the right to express
[7:43] ourselves
[7:45] in voice and in religious
[7:49] celebration. We're grateful for the
[7:52] other
[7:54] freedoms we enjoy and grateful for our
[7:56] military and pray for them wherever they
[7:58] may be.
[8:00] We give thee thanks again for the
[8:02] opportunity we have to live in this city
[8:05] and to enjoy the comfort and the
[8:08] blessings afforded to us.
[8:11] We're mindful of many throughout this
[8:13] community and throughout our nation that
[8:16] are struggling and need of temporal and
[8:19] emotional and physical or spiritual
[8:22] blessings at this time. We pray for
[8:24] them. We again give thee thanks for what
[8:26] we have and offer this invocation
[8:30] humbly and in the name of Jesus Christ
[8:32] our savior. Amen.
[8:34] >> Amen.
[8:35] » Amen.
[8:35] >> Thank you wells. You can remain with us
[8:39] » Thank you wells. You can remain with us
[8:39] then. I pledge algiance to the flag of
[8:43] the United States of America and to the
[8:46] republic for which it stands. One nation
[8:49] under God, indivisible with liberty and
[8:52] justice for all.
[9:00] Thank you all.
[9:03] Do we have any public announcements?
[9:04] Madam City Clerk, we'll open the uh
[9:08] meeting for public comment at this time.
[9:10] Those of you who are in the chambers,
[9:13] welcome to come forward and speak. Uh,
[9:18] and if there is anybody on the phone
[9:20] line, it's 7025899629.
[9:25] And while we're waiting for someone to
[9:27] call if they are going to, if anyone's
[9:29] here in the chambers like to say
[9:31] something, you're more than welcome to
[9:35] at this time.
[9:43] My name is Robin Baker. I'm a Boulder
[9:45] City resident and first I would just
[9:48] like to thank everyone who's up here and
[9:51] everyone who works so hard um to keep
[9:55] things moving forward in a positive way.
[9:57] I I'm very appreciative of that. I'd
[10:00] like to speak to I think it's item 21,
[10:03] the historic preservation choosing
[10:05] selecting a new commissioner. And I just
[10:08] have a few things to say. Um,
[10:11] number one, I'm hoping that you choose a
[10:14] commissioner who advocates for historic
[10:16] preservation,
[10:18] someone who actually, and I, it's
[10:20] nothing against anyone who's already
[10:22] been on the commission. I think it's a
[10:24] very difficult position to be in. Um,
[10:28] but I would like to have someone who
[10:30] advocates for the historic district and
[10:33] actually challenges the status quo. We
[10:37] don't know how many houses are
[10:38] contributing at this time because we
[10:40] don't collect data. So, how can we move
[10:44] forward and move toward where we have a
[10:48] sense of place that actually we know
[10:50] we're enhancing the historic district
[10:53] rather than diminishing it.
[10:55] I know that the individuals who are on
[11:00] the commission are dedicated and they
[11:03] give their time freely and that I
[11:06] appreciate it very much. On the other
[11:08] hand, um I have very high expectations
[11:12] not only for the historic district for
[11:14] but for the city because it's my home
[11:16] and I want it to thrive. I want it to be
[11:19] better. And so, um, I'm trying not to
[11:23] ask for too much, but for those people
[11:26] that I speak with regularly, they know
[11:28] that I have very high expectations.
[11:31] And so, I will continue to try to be a
[11:34] voice, but I do appreciate um the amount
[11:37] of time and energy you put into it and
[11:39] hope you have a good night tonight.
[11:40] Thank you.
[11:42] >> Thank you. Appreciate it. Anyone on the
[11:44] » Thank you. Appreciate it. Anyone on the
[11:44] phone?
[11:49] comments.
[11:50] >> State your name and speak your comments,
[11:52] » State your name and speak your comments,
[11:52] please.
[11:54] >> My name is Gregory Kvasovich and I'm
[11:57] » My name is Gregory Kvasovich and I'm
[11:57] calling in regards to the parking
[11:59] situation going on in Boulder City. Uh I
[12:03] happen to live on a corner and I've been
[12:06] targeted by the same person that's going
[12:08] around and I know this because he's
[12:11] using old pictures of my trailer
[12:14] >> constantly twice week. I'm sorry to
[12:17] » constantly twice week. I'm sorry to
[12:17] interrupt you, but during the first
[12:19] public comment period, it is limited to
[12:21] matters that are on the agenda.
[12:23] >> Oh, well, the video didn't say that.
[12:26] » Oh, well, the video didn't say that.
[12:26] >> The the second public comment period,
[12:28] » The the second public comment period,
[12:28] you're welcome to call back and speak
[12:30] your comments.
[12:32] >> How long will that be?
[12:35] » How long will that be?
[12:35] >> You would just have to watch the meeting
[12:37] » You would just have to watch the meeting
[12:37] live because there's there's no
[12:40] time available for when we would get
[12:42] through the items.
[12:44] >> Okay, I will do that. Thank you.
[12:45] » Okay, I will do that. Thank you.
[12:45] >> You're welcome. Bye-bye.
[12:47] » You're welcome. Bye-bye.
[12:47] >> Thank you.
[12:51] Anyone else on 7025899629?
[12:56] Go ahead. Brandon Smith for the record.
[12:59] Good evening, Mayor, council, staff,
[13:01] ladies and gentlemen. Uh, happy new
[13:03] year. Welcome to 2026.
[13:06] Um, just wanted to throw my two cents in
[13:10] for agenda item number 21. um your
[13:14] selection of appointments for the HPC
[13:18] um committee tonight. Um I would just
[13:20] like to
[13:22] uh beg you all to please remember that
[13:27] um our current committee uh isn't yet
[13:31] made up of um 50%
[13:35] of um historic homeowners here in the
[13:38] district. And um I would love for the
[13:43] people of the historic district that own
[13:45] the historic district and live in the
[13:47] historic district are fairly represented
[13:50] by that committee. Um so I would uh
[13:54] again politely beg you guys to consider
[13:57] that when you're making your selections
[13:58] for tonight. Um uh it's it only makes
[14:02] sense for uh that committee to be fairly
[14:06] represented by people actually in the
[14:08] historic district. Thank you so much for
[14:10] all you guys do and hope you had a good
[14:12] holiday. Thank you. Appreciate it.
[14:26] 7025899629
[14:30] is the number to call in if you have
[14:32] something that you'd like to add on
[14:35] public comment the initial public
[14:36] comments and if there's anyone here in
[14:39] the chambers who would like to come
[14:42] forward at this time that would be they
[14:44] would be welcome
[14:48] anyone on 7025899
[14:50] 9629.
[14:54] Seeing no one on the phone line, no one
[14:57] here in chambers, we will close public
[14:59] comment
[15:00] and move to
[15:06] items for action
[15:10] on the consent agenda. Do I have a
[15:13] motion to approve the regular agenda
[15:16] first?
[15:17] Mayor staff is requesting that item
[15:19] number 13 be removed from the regular
[15:21] agenda. We didn't have an audit review
[15:24] committee meeting prior the council
[15:27] meeting. So there's no recommendation at
[15:29] this time.
[15:30] >> Okay. We will remove 13 from the regular
[15:32] » Okay. We will remove 13 from the regular
[15:32] agenda and then I'll still take a motion
[15:35] to approve the regular agenda but with
[15:37] removal of item 13.
[15:39] >> I move to approve the regular agenda.
[15:42] » I move to approve the regular agenda.
[15:42] >> Is there a second?
[15:43] » Is there a second?
[15:43] >> A second.
[15:43] » A second.
[15:44] >> All those in favor say I.
[15:45] » All those in favor say I.
[15:45] >> I. Thank you. It's unanimous. And then
[15:48] » I. Thank you. It's unanimous. And then
[15:48] the consent agenda. Do I have a motion
[15:50] to approve the second agenda? The
[15:53] consent agenda.
[15:54] >> I move to approve the consent agenda.
[15:57] » I move to approve the consent agenda.
[15:57] >> I'll second that.
[15:58] » I'll second that.
[15:58] >> All those in favor say I.
[16:00] » All those in favor say I.
[16:00] >> I. Thank you. That's approved. We'll
[16:02] » I. Thank you. That's approved. We'll
[16:02] move to the regular agenda now. And
[16:05] we'll have a presentation under number
[16:08] 11.
[16:09] Um
[16:11] and our finance director.
[16:17] » You're welcome.
[16:22] » Good evening, mayor and council. I am
[16:24] Cynthia Snee, your finance director, and
[16:26] I'm very happy to be here tonight and
[16:28] give you an update on the finance
[16:30] department. It's our our annual update.
[16:37] Okay. Finance divisions include a
[16:39] significant number of years of public
[16:42] and governmental service and we're very
[16:43] proud of that. And our five divisions uh
[16:46] in in the department are accounting,
[16:49] budget, purchase, purchasing, grants,
[16:51] risk management uh and contracts, real
[16:54] estate and utility billing.
[16:57] That's the same as it has been for a
[16:58] long time. That hasn't really changed.
[17:01] Okay. So, a little bit more about
[17:02] accounting. Um that includes accounts
[17:05] receivable where we bill out
[17:06] particularly the uh for airport leases
[17:08] and the and the land leases out in the
[17:10] valley. We've got about 230 accounts
[17:13] that we maintain with that accounts
[17:15] payables when where we pay our bills
[17:17] from from vendors uh invoicing and
[17:20] employee uh reimbursement expense
[17:22] reimbursements. And that totals about
[17:25] almost 8,500 invoices every year that
[17:28] that we're processing. So it's a lot. In
[17:32] general accounting, we reconcile and
[17:34] maintain over 8,000 general ledger
[17:36] accounts. And in that includes financial
[17:39] reporting. We have 20 standard reports
[17:42] that we put out. And I know you're
[17:43] familiar with with many of those.
[17:49] All right. In specific in accounting,
[17:51] we've got payroll, and we we pay about
[17:54] 320 employees every bi-weekly. That
[17:56] varies a little bit because we have a
[17:58] lot of part-time, seasonal employees. So
[18:00] it it kind of goes up and down. We
[18:02] process all the W2s for all the
[18:04] employees. Um all of the related
[18:07] payments and reporting that goes along
[18:09] with with processing payroll.
[18:13] The budget division
[18:15] budget develops the the both the
[18:17] operating budget and the capital
[18:19] improvement plan. Um they monitor the
[18:22] budget both of those budgets throughout
[18:23] the year and and provide some research
[18:26] and analysis. Um, largely I say,
[18:29] "Angela, I need you to look at this."
[18:31] And and there it is. Um, they also do
[18:35] the five-year capital improvement plan,
[18:36] which you'll hear from Angela in a
[18:38] little bit for the upcoming five-year
[18:40] plan. And we are responsible for
[18:43] monitoring and and complying with the
[18:45] regulations um state and federal
[18:48] regulations.
[18:51] Okay. A little bit more about the
[18:52] budget. Uh we pro last year we prepared
[18:55] the award-winning annual city budget.
[18:58] That's the same one same award that
[19:00] we've been receiving for the last many
[19:02] years. We're very proud of that. That's
[19:04] we'll talk a little bit more about that
[19:05] in a second. They prepared last year's
[19:08] CIP and we improved our budget process
[19:12] last year. We're trying looking for
[19:14] continuous improvement. Last year we had
[19:17] a little bit different process where uh
[19:19] we presented the draft budget to the
[19:20] directors and said help us to reduce
[19:25] because we knew we needed to come with
[19:26] an operating budget. That's part of your
[19:28] your mandate and uh we needed help from
[19:31] all the department directors to get
[19:32] there and and we did that and so very
[19:35] proud of that.
[19:39] the purchasing division.
[19:42] Um, this is, let me go back for a
[19:45] second. Angela, you all know Angela, but
[19:47] Angela's our budget manager, okay? And
[19:49] Paul is our purchasing division head,
[19:52] and it's includes so much more than just
[19:54] purchasing. Um, he works on expense
[19:57] contracts and risk management and
[19:59] insurance claims and grants and grant
[20:02] coordination. So, he definitely gets the
[20:04] prize for the most hats to wear in the
[20:07] the department.
[20:09] So, a little more detail about his
[20:11] workload. Um, he completed 25 formal
[20:14] solicitations, RFPs, which saved the
[20:17] city $2.6 million. Um, the the purpose
[20:21] of that is to get the best um not only
[20:24] the lowest price, but the best product
[20:26] for the price um for the city, what's in
[20:29] the best interest of the city. uh 266
[20:32] contracts that he wrote and uh
[20:35] administered and negotiated along with
[20:37] the city attorney on most of those.
[20:40] Completed a lot uh 17 claims and and
[20:42] nine subregation actions where we were
[20:44] able to recover money from from
[20:46] different um claims against the city
[20:50] and managed 19 different grant programs
[20:52] valued at 17 million. Want to go into a
[20:55] little more detail about that. Most of
[20:57] that, well, about half of it, um, over 9
[21:00] million is specific to the airport and
[21:03] FAA grants for a lot of the capital
[21:05] projects that are going on out there.
[21:08] And it's historic preservation
[21:10] grants, CDBG, the um,
[21:15] for lend a hand and and emergency aid,
[21:18] uh, Clark County emergency operations,
[21:20] our dark dark skies retrofitting with
[21:23] the the street lights.
[21:26] We've got some police grants joining
[21:29] forces was about 50,000 and a water
[21:33] smart grant which is uh about water
[21:36] meters um replacing with a radio reads
[21:39] which makes it more more accurate and
[21:41] more efficient for our meter meters to
[21:43] be out there. Um and another
[21:45] infrastructure upgrade for the water
[21:47] wastewater treatment plant. So there we
[21:51] go. Lots of lots of grant activity on
[21:53] top of everything else that that comes
[21:54] out of the purchasing division
[21:57] contracts and real estate. That's Brock
[22:00] back. Um he works with land sales, land
[22:03] leases, research and analysis, and he's
[22:06] my special projects guy and and he does
[22:09] all those beautiful brochures that you
[22:11] see with all the financial data bringing
[22:13] it down to a a more attractive document.
[22:17] So some special things that he has done
[22:19] this year. uh prepared an enhanced and
[22:22] expanded online budget summary. So
[22:24] that's one of those beautiful
[22:25] publications that we see at the budget
[22:27] and summary. Um he really uh beefed that
[22:31] one up so it's a lot lot nicer. Um not
[22:34] that it wasn't nice before Brock
[22:37] and he assists me with the financial
[22:39] forecasts and the other transparency
[22:41] improvements. We the software that we
[22:43] used to produce the budget book went
[22:45] through a major upgrade and he was part
[22:47] of that. he was part of the beta testing
[22:49] to to get that, you know, up and going
[22:51] and and so we'll greatly benefit from
[22:53] that. It'll be a much more attractive
[22:55] document in the future.
[22:58] Okay. Utility billing. Is Brady here? I
[23:00] didn't see Brady. No. Oh, you know
[23:02] Brady? Um his group provides all the
[23:06] utility billing. So that's reading the
[23:08] meters, generating the bills, sending
[23:10] the bills out, collecting the payments.
[23:13] Um they also do the business licensing
[23:15] for the for the city.
[23:18] And this graph is really just to show
[23:21] that how stable our utility accounts
[23:23] have been year-over-year. Um, not much
[23:26] has changed, but that's not surprising
[23:27] given the the uh growth control
[23:31] situation that we're in. Things are
[23:32] pretty pretty constant there, pretty
[23:34] consistent.
[23:37] And then for our financial reports, um,
[23:39] I had hoped to be able to bring to you
[23:41] the fiscal year 25 report, but um, we're
[23:44] not quite there yet. So we prepare that
[23:46] annual document that goes through the
[23:48] audit and that was um independently
[23:51] audited and for fiscal year 24 which you
[23:55] see the cover here that did win the the
[23:57] GFOA award again and we will be
[24:00] submitting the fiscal year 25 for that
[24:02] same award. So speaking of the GFOA
[24:05] awards, um this is the certificate of
[24:08] achievement is the one for the financial
[24:11] statements for the AER and we've uh been
[24:13] awarded that um for 33 years consecutive
[24:17] years. So we're very proud of that.
[24:20] And is Amara here?
[24:21] >> How many people get that award?
[24:25] » How many people get that award?
[24:25] >> A lot of G a lot of people get that
[24:27] » A lot of G a lot of people get that
[24:27] individual award. I don't know the
[24:29] number, but it's it's many many where
[24:31] it's a very small population is when you
[24:33] get all three awards. But this one by
[24:35] itself is the one that's been um in
[24:38] existence the longest. And so there's a
[24:40] lot lot of governments that receive that
[24:42] one.
[24:42] >> So do we know anybody that gets all
[24:44] » So do we know anybody that gets all
[24:44] three?
[24:45] >> Well, we do.
[24:47] » Well, we do.
[24:47] >> I'm getting there. You beat me to it,
[24:49] » I'm getting there. You beat me to it,
[24:49] mayor.
[24:50] >> Um yes, and there's only a couple in the
[24:52] » Um yes, and there's only a couple in the
[24:52] state of Nevada that that do for our
[24:56] again more GFO awards. the budget award.
[24:58] We received that again for fiscal year
[25:00] 26. They had a real fast turnaround with
[25:02] this one, which was nice. Um, we've
[25:04] already been awarded for the most recent
[25:06] budget document we've done.
[25:10] And this is the newest award that they
[25:12] have, um, the popular annual financial
[25:14] report. We call that the paffer. um
[25:17] that's a basically a a regurgitation of
[25:19] what's in the big financial document but
[25:22] in a only a few pages and it's got some
[25:25] cute graphics and it's a lot easier um
[25:28] to digest that data. You don't have to
[25:30] be an accounting expert to to get to
[25:32] what what it's after. Um we've been
[25:35] producing that for a few years and we
[25:36] did in fact win that one award as well
[25:39] which does qualify us for the triple
[25:42] crown.
[25:43] Um we're very very very pleased to have
[25:46] to have won that again for all of our
[25:47] reports that we produced last year and
[25:50] we are submitting them as we prepare
[25:52] them this year and with the expectation
[25:54] that we'll meet all the criteria to to
[25:56] qualify for that again. And this one uh
[25:59] to your point mayor is only se several
[26:01] hundred governments in the entire nation
[26:04] that are awarded that one.
[26:08] Another award that we're happy to talk
[26:09] about is last year, this time last year,
[26:11] we submitted um a proposal application
[26:14] to the Cashman good governance award and
[26:17] we did uh win for we're in first place
[26:20] for the small city. They have different
[26:22] categories and for the small city we we
[26:25] did win that one which then qualified us
[26:27] to be a finalist for the the big overall
[26:29] award. We I guess we were runner up. We
[26:33] didn't did not get the overall award,
[26:34] but we did win the the small city one
[26:36] that and the the topic of that was the
[26:39] solar or the land leases and how that
[26:41] has been, you know, our our lifeline um
[26:45] since we don't have the other types of
[26:46] revenues that the other cities do.
[26:50] And we're very pleased that Paul um our
[26:53] mini hat man was elected chairman of the
[26:57] poolacted um organization. So he's he's
[27:02] a we have a a strong voice there. He
[27:05] does a great job
[27:08] and that's
[27:09] that's it. Happy to answer any
[27:11] questions.
[27:12] >> Any questions or comments?
[27:16] » Okay.
[27:17] >> I don't have any questions. Just a few
[27:19] » I don't have any questions. Just a few
[27:19] comments. Um it seemed like best
[27:21] practice when you said that you meet
[27:22] with the other offices. Did um directors
[27:26] of the departments to find out where
[27:29] best monies can be spent? That seems
[27:31] unusual that a government would do that
[27:34] um being that things tend to be
[27:36] earmarked, but you found a way to save
[27:38] money by working together to see where
[27:40] things could be moved. So that's a a big
[27:42] plus. Thank you for sharing that. Thank
[27:45] you also for breaking down the grants. I
[27:46] think it was Councilwoman Jurgensson who
[27:48] asked for that breakdown um at your last
[27:51] annual meeting and it's good to know
[27:53] that the public would know where a lot
[27:55] of our funds come from. So the grants
[27:57] somebody's doing some kind of grant
[27:59] writing. I imagine that's Paul and uh
[28:01] you know who does grants
[28:03] >> that typically comes from the individual
[28:05] » that typically comes from the individual
[28:05] departments. Okay.
[28:06] >> Um he may polish it up but the you know
[28:08] » Um he may polish it up but the you know
[28:08] the meat of it comes from the
[28:10] departments as they identify grant
[28:11] opportunity.
[28:12] >> It's a big deal either way. grants are
[28:14] » It's a big deal either way. grants are
[28:14] hard to get and uh we have so many of
[28:16] them which is good. I do actually have
[28:17] one question on the utility bills. Um
[28:20] online versus mailin
[28:23] um what's the equation on those a
[28:25] percentage and does it save any money if
[28:28] you go online? So currently it's about a
[28:32] 7525%
[28:33] split. 25 being where we send out an
[28:36] email to to the customers and then they
[28:39] have the opportunity to to pay online or
[28:42] do a like a direct um payment, you know,
[28:46] right direct debit out of their checking
[28:48] account. So that's 25%. The other 75% we
[28:52] actually mail a physical bill to. Um and
[28:55] so those either come back in the mail or
[28:57] you know might come back in person to to
[29:00] pay those.
[29:00] >> Okay.
[29:01] » Okay.
[29:01] >> Um and it definitely is more cost
[29:03] » Um and it definitely is more cost
[29:03] effective for the electronic that if
[29:06] people include the email and then just
[29:09] pay the fee um online. It is much more
[29:12] cost effective than the snail mail.
[29:14] >> I bet stamps are going up.
[29:16] » I bet stamps are going up.
[29:16] >> St. Yes, they are. It's about 80 cents I
[29:19] » St. Yes, they are. It's about 80 cents I
[29:19] think.
[29:19] >> And congratulations on the triple crown
[29:21] » And congratulations on the triple crown
[29:21] award.
[29:22] >> Thank you.
[29:22] » Thank you.
[29:22] >> Thank you to you and the staff. That is
[29:25] » Thank you to you and the staff. That is
[29:25] that is all these guys that is under
[29:27] >> Thank you all you guys.
[29:30] » Thank you all you guys.
[29:30] >> Thank you. Go ahead.
[29:33] » Thank you. Go ahead.
[29:33] >> Maybe for a point of clarification if
[29:35] » Maybe for a point of clarification if
[29:35] there's anyone listening who would like
[29:37] to receive an electronic bill now, what
[29:40] would the process be for them to be able
[29:42] to do that?
[29:43] >> They can contact the utility billing
[29:46] » They can contact the utility billing
[29:46] department um or division.
[29:49] I I don't have their phone number off
[29:50] top of my head, but yeah. So contact
[29:53] them and then set that up and they could
[29:55] also be part of that and maybe by this
[29:57] time next year we could have 35%.
[29:59] >> Right. Right.
[29:59] » Right. Right.
[29:59] >> And there may I don't want to speak out
[30:01] » And there may I don't want to speak out
[30:01] of line but there may be an opportunity
[30:03] to make that election through our um
[30:06] website if you navigate to where the
[30:09] utility billing area is. I think you can
[30:11] opt in that way.
[30:12] >> Okay. So you can talk to a real person.
[30:14] » Okay. So you can talk to a real person.
[30:14] >> You can
[30:15] » You can
[30:15] >> if you need to or want to or you could
[30:17] » if you need to or want to or you could
[30:17] go online and navigate and try to do it
[30:19] possibly,
[30:20] >> I believe. We'll check on that so that
[30:23] » I believe. We'll check on that so that
[30:23] we know um 221 years experience and I
[30:27] think that that says a lot and I think
[30:30] it also says a lot about why we are
[30:33] Triple Crown winners and um the things
[30:36] that aren't said a lot of times are the
[30:39] ways that you listen to us when we ask
[30:42] for things and respond um as a staff as
[30:46] a whole staff and as a budgeting and um
[30:49] finance uh committee. or group. Uh we
[30:53] have asked the hard ask of a nearly as
[30:57] close as you can balanced budget for
[31:00] each year and I know that that is
[31:02] stressful at a government level and I
[31:04] appreciated the respect that you had for
[31:07] us up here that you could understand how
[31:10] hard it would be for us to vote on
[31:11] something that had a $10 million
[31:14] um discrepancy, right? It didn't seem
[31:17] like being wise stewards over the monies
[31:19] that were there. So, I want to say and I
[31:22] I'm sure all of the council thank you
[31:24] for that um for helping us and uh the
[31:28] numbers indicate that you did very well
[31:30] with that budgeting and I know that that
[31:32] took staff members in other areas too to
[31:36] come to the conclusions like council
[31:38] member Asher said of how that budget
[31:40] would come together and and how they
[31:42] could get their numbers closer and and
[31:46] reflect what was going to happen. So,
[31:48] thank you um to all of you that um do
[31:52] what you do for our city to make sure
[31:54] that we stay uh fiscally responsible and
[31:58] shine even. So, thank you very much.
[32:01] >> Thank you.
[32:02] » Thank you.
[32:02] >> Thank you,
[32:03] » Thank you,
[32:03] >> Mayor. If I may just interject to in
[32:06] » Mayor. If I may just interject to in
[32:06] response to Council Member Jorgensson's
[32:07] question.
[32:09] >> Um I I was able to look up online pretty
[32:12] » Um I I was able to look up online pretty
[32:12] quickly. So yes, it's on our website as
[32:14] uh uh director Sneed has said, there is
[32:17] a separate page that's paying your bill
[32:19] online. It describes the new online bill
[32:22] uh payment system is now available and
[32:24] if you scroll down there's a a click to
[32:26] begin here. Oh yeah, they've got it
[32:28] shown right up there on the screen. So
[32:30] excellent. So it's available.
[32:32] >> Look at these people.
[32:34] » Look at these people.
[32:34] Team
[32:34] >> teamwork.
[32:35] » teamwork.
[32:35] >> Nice. I love it. Thank you. Thank you.
[32:40] » Nice. I love it. Thank you. Thank you.
[32:40] >> Thank you. Thank you.
[32:42] » Thank you. Thank you.
[32:42] Thanks. Okay. Thank you. Appreciate the
[32:44] report. Thank you.
[32:49] » Brings us to number 12 on the agenda.
[32:52] Need a introduction of bill number 2092.
[32:59] » Mayor, I'll introduce bill 2092 and wave
[33:01] the reading except for title.
[33:03] >> Thank you.
[33:06] » Thank you.
[33:06] >> Thank you. Bill number 2092, an
[33:08] » Thank you. Bill number 2092, an
[33:08] ordinance of the city of Boulder City,
[33:10] Nevada, amending Boulder City Municipal
[33:13] Code, Title One, Administration. Chapter
[33:16] 10, Emergency Management. Title Two,
[33:19] Departments. Chapter 6, Public Works
[33:22] Department, and Chapter 7, Utilities
[33:24] Department. Title 9, Public Ways and
[33:27] Property. Chapter 5, Underground
[33:29] installations required. Chapter 8, Water
[33:32] Utility Regulations. Chapter 9, Sewer
[33:35] Utility. Chapter 10, Electric Utility
[33:38] Regulations, and Chapter 14, Boulder
[33:40] City Water Conservation Plan to reassign
[33:44] staff responsibilities. This matter will
[33:46] be considered at the January 27th, 2026
[33:50] council meeting.
[33:51] >> Thank you.
[33:54] » Thank you.
[33:54] That brings us to number 13 on the
[33:56] regular business that we have removed.
[33:59] And
[34:02] >> and that brings us to number 14.
[34:06] » and that brings us to number 14.
[34:06] Thank you, mayor. I'm uh city manager
[34:08] Ned Thomas. Item number 14 is a um
[34:13] public hearing on there two parts.
[34:15] There's a public hearing on the
[34:16] collective bargaining agreement for the
[34:18] Teamsters Local 14 clerical bargaining
[34:20] unit and also a resolution approving uh
[34:23] that uh bargaining agreement between the
[34:25] city and Teamsters Local 14 clerical. Uh
[34:28] just by way quickly by way of background
[34:31] uh over the past uh since July, well
[34:34] yeah over the past year really the city
[34:37] staff and outside council have engaged
[34:39] in good faith negotiations with
[34:41] representatives of the clerical
[34:43] bargaining unit to negotiate a new
[34:45] collective bargaining agreement. Their
[34:47] previous agreement expired on June 30th,
[34:51] 2025.
[34:52] Um the city and the unit and the union
[34:54] have tenatively agreed on a proposal to
[34:56] extend their uh agreement for three
[34:59] years with increases in the city's
[35:01] contribution toward healthcare insurance
[35:03] and wages. Um under NRS288.153,
[35:08] any new extended or modified uh
[35:10] bargaining agreement between the local
[35:12] government as employer and the union
[35:14] must be approved uh by this public in a
[35:17] public hearing. That's why we're here
[35:18] tonight and um provide you with a quick
[35:20] report. The total fiscal impact of this
[35:22] agreement would be an increase over the
[35:24] three years of 1.145
[35:30] 584.21.
[35:31] So a little a little over 1.145
[35:34] million. Uh there would be wage
[35:37] increases of approximately $229,000
[35:40] in the first year including the medical
[35:43] insurance contributions. In um fiscal
[35:47] year 23, they would total up to 38 an
[35:50] additional an increase um of 384 just
[35:54] over 384,000
[35:56] uh with benefits and then in fiscal year
[35:59] 28 a little over $532,000.
[36:03] When we come back uh next week with the
[36:05] five or ne in two weeks with the
[36:08] five-year financial forecast, we will
[36:10] provide some more additional information
[36:12] so that you can see how all of that fits
[36:14] in with the other um unions that we're
[36:16] negotiating with with an overall picture
[36:18] of that. But for tonight, we're just
[36:20] here for the clerical bargaining unit
[36:22] and um happy to answer any additional
[36:25] questions you might have.
[36:29] I just have one. Um
[36:33] is I know there's been a lot of uh
[36:35] movement and various topics. Is this um
[36:42] effective with all the changes July 1 or
[36:46] when ratified?
[36:48] >> Yes, it will be retroactive to the start
[36:49] » Yes, it will be retroactive to the start
[36:49] of the new fiscal year.
[36:50] >> Thank you.
[36:51] » Thank you.
[36:51] >> And the start of the new of this
[36:53] » And the start of the new of this
[36:53] agreement.
[36:57] And that uh if there's no other
[36:59] questions, we'll open this up for public
[37:01] hearing.
[37:03] Anyone like to come forward or on the
[37:05] line uh for a public hearing on this
[37:08] item if you were on the line?
[37:10] 7025899629.
[37:14] That's 7025899629.
[37:17] This is a public hearing. If there's
[37:19] anyone like to come forward at this
[37:21] time, use the microphone here in
[37:23] chambers, you're welcome to do so.
[37:27] If not, we'll wait a little bit.
[37:31] 7025899629.
[37:34] This is a public hearing on the
[37:36] collective bargaining agreement with the
[37:38] Teamsters Local 14 Clerical Bargaining
[37:41] Unit.
[37:45] No one on the phone line. Uh that leads
[37:48] us to uh the resolution number 8085
[37:53] for approval. Do I have a motion? I move
[37:56] to approve resolution 8085.
[37:59] >> Is there a second?
[38:01] » Is there a second?
[38:01] >> Second.
[38:02] » Second.
[38:02] >> Any discussion?
[38:05] » Any discussion?
[38:05] >> All those in favor say I. I. Any of
[38:08] » All those in favor say I. I. Any of
[38:08] those say nay. It was unanimous. Thank
[38:09] you.
[38:12] We'll move to item 15. Mr. City Manager.
[38:20] Thank you. U. This item is a collective
[38:24] uh bargaining agreement.
[38:27] Excuse me. This item is a resolution u
[38:31] approving an amended and restated
[38:33] collective bargaining agreement between
[38:34] the city and team's local 14 fire
[38:37] captain's bargaining unit. uh the
[38:39] collective bargaining agreement for this
[38:41] uh union uh again team's 14 fire
[38:44] captains uh expired in June 30th and the
[38:47] city and the fire captains entered into
[38:49] a new agreement effective August 25. Uh
[38:52] this they were the first group in this
[38:54] round of negotiations to conclude their
[38:56] uh agreement which we um we were very
[38:58] pleased to do that. However, during the
[39:01] negotiations uh or after the agreement
[39:04] was approved, it was discovered that we
[39:06] had uh differing interpretations of the
[39:08] reserve program that's part of article
[39:10] one of the the new agreement. And it's
[39:12] regarding how and when reserves are
[39:15] used. And so to clarify that language,
[39:18] the city and the union held uh
[39:20] additional discussions to settle the
[39:21] agree disagreement. and we uh happily we
[39:25] agreed to modify the language as set
[39:26] forth in the amended and restated
[39:28] collective bargain agreement that's
[39:30] before you tonight. So there's no fiscal
[39:32] impact with this change. It's just a
[39:34] clarification of the language that was
[39:36] there. And uh so NRS requires that this
[39:40] type of a modified agreement come back
[39:42] to you for approval in a public hearing.
[39:45] Happy to answer any questions.
[39:46] >> Thank you. Any questions?
[39:48] » Thank you. Any questions?
[39:48] >> I have a disclosure.
[39:50] » I have a disclosure.
[39:50] >> Okay.
[39:51] » Okay.
[39:51] I would like to disclose pursuant to
[39:53] NRS281A that my son Nigel Walton is a
[39:56] fire captain for Boulder City Fire and
[39:59] this matter concerns the collective
[40:01] bargaining agreement for the captain's
[40:03] bargaining unit of which he is a member.
[40:05] Because this is a relationship under
[40:07] Nevada ethics law that would likely
[40:09] impact the judgment of a reasonable
[40:11] person in my situation. I will be
[40:13] abstaining on this item. Thank you.
[40:16] >> Thank you.
[40:17] » Thank you.
[40:18] Any other questions or
[40:21] So, we uh will open the public hearing
[40:25] on this particular item. If you're
[40:27] calling in 7025899629,
[40:32] if you're here in chambers, welcome to
[40:34] come forward and say whatever you would
[40:36] like to say on this item. We'll wait a
[40:40] little bit and see if we have anyone on
[40:42] the phone line. 702589
[40:45] 9629.
[40:48] Anyone in chambers likewise
[40:52] can come forward.
[40:58] That's 7025899629
[41:02] for
[41:05] any public hearing public comment. At
[41:08] this time,
[41:10] anyone on the phone line? We will close
[41:13] the uh public hearing and move to the
[41:16] resolution number 8086. Do I have a
[41:20] motion?
[41:21] >> I move to pass resolution number 8086.
[41:25] » I move to pass resolution number 8086.
[41:25] >> Is there a second?
[41:26] » Is there a second?
[41:26] >> A second.
[41:28] » A second.
[41:28] >> Is there discussion?
[41:31] » Is there discussion?
[41:31] All those in favor say I.
[41:33] >> I.
[41:34] » I.
[41:34] >> Any opposed? One abstension. Thank you.
[41:38] » Any opposed? One abstension. Thank you.
[41:38] And that brings us to item 16, approval
[41:42] of the tenative capital improvement plan
[41:44] for fiscal years 27 through 31.
[41:52] Hello, Angela Manin, budget manager. So
[41:56] today we're looking for tenative
[41:57] approval on the 5-year CIP plan. And the
[42:00] reason we look for tenative approval for
[42:02] the CIP is we're about to go into the
[42:05] operating budget. And so having
[42:08] a starting point, knowing what we're
[42:10] going to do with CIB really helps that
[42:12] process. And also occasionally um some
[42:15] capital projects have operating costs.
[42:17] So to know about those costs before we
[42:18] go into the operating budget.
[42:23] So
[42:24] our 5-year plan has 54 projects with a
[42:27] combined cost of $134.5 million. Fiscal
[42:31] year 27 has 35 projects with a combined
[42:35] cost of $35.1 million.
[42:39] This chart is showing the funding
[42:41] sources for our 5-year plan. It's a
[42:44] total of $134.5 million.
[42:47] Um 40% of this is coming from the
[42:49] enterprise funds which is $53.7 million.
[42:53] That's $3 million coming from our
[42:54] airport. 26.6 million coming from our
[42:57] electric fund. 14 million coming from
[43:00] wastewater and 10 million coming from
[43:02] our water fund. Outside funding is 24%
[43:05] or $32.8 million. And that's 27.2
[43:09] million coming from the FAA to support
[43:11] our airport and also 5.6 million coming
[43:13] from RTC to support our streets. The
[43:16] government fund is 19% or 25 million and
[43:20] this includes 8.6 million coming from
[43:22] our acquisitions and improvements fund,
[43:24] 12.5 million coming from our pool fund,
[43:27] and 3.8 8 million coming from our
[43:29] redevelopment fund. The voter approved
[43:33] is 17% or $22.5 million and that's $3.5
[43:38] million of the annual approved um
[43:39] spending from that fund and also $18.9
[43:43] million from the sale of Track 350, also
[43:45] known as Liberty Rich. And then our golf
[43:48] course search charge funds is less than
[43:49] 1% at $415,000 for equipment at our golf
[43:54] courses.
[43:57] This ne next chart is just uh funding
[43:59] sources for fiscal year 27. It's a total
[44:02] of $35.1 million.
[44:05] So the largest portion is governmental
[44:08] at 44% or $15.5 million. This includes
[44:12] $1.8 million coming from acquisitions
[44:14] and improvements, 11.8 from our pool
[44:17] fund, and $1.9 million from our
[44:19] redevelopment fund. This is unusual for
[44:22] our CIP graph where our funding sources
[44:24] are for government to be so high and
[44:26] it's because we have that really large
[44:28] pool project coming up in 27. And so if
[44:31] we were to take out the pool project, it
[44:32] would be 25% for the government funds.
[44:36] The next one is voter approved is 27% or
[44:39] 9.5 million and that's the $1 million
[44:42] that is approved annually to spend and
[44:44] also 8.5 million from the sale of track
[44:46] 350.
[44:48] And then the enterprise funds is 20% or
[44:51] $6.9 million which is $140,000 coming
[44:55] from our airport. 5 million coming from
[44:57] our electric fund, $400,000 coming from
[45:00] our wastewater fund and 1.4 million
[45:03] coming from our water fund. Outside
[45:05] funding is $2.6 million or 8% and that
[45:10] is 1.2 million coming from FA to support
[45:12] our airport and 1.4 coming from RTC to
[45:15] support our streets. And again, this is
[45:18] very unique because of our very large
[45:19] pool project. And so our breakdown is
[45:21] not typical. If we were to take out the
[45:23] pool project, uh maybe 25% governmental,
[45:27] 7% voter approved, 47% enterprise fund,
[45:31] and 18% outside funding. And that'd be
[45:33] more in the norm on spending.
[45:39] So, our fun our governmental funding
[45:41] sources for fiscal year 27 include um a
[45:44] transfer from the general fund to
[45:45] acquisitions to improvements of up to $
[45:47] 1.5 million. Also, the swimming pool
[45:50] fund resources of $20.3 million include
[45:53] 11.8 million in fund balance from
[45:56] donations, voter approved funding, and
[45:57] investment revenue. It also has that
[45:59] additional 8.5 in voter approved um
[46:03] spending from the sale of track 350. The
[46:06] redevelopment fund is will use the
[46:08] resources of $ 1.9 million to promote
[46:11] businesses in the RDA district.
[46:15] So again, so voter approved um spending
[46:17] in fiscal year 27 will be $9.5 million.
[46:21] And so with the sale of track 350, also
[46:25] known as Liberty Ridge, it was approved
[46:27] by the voters voters. That 90% will go
[46:29] to the pool and 10% will go to public
[46:31] safety. So in fiscal year 27, $8.5
[46:34] million will go to the pool from that
[46:36] sale. And then also for fiscal year 27,
[46:39] we have that annual spending of $1
[46:41] million. So that spending of voter
[46:44] approved funding of $1 million is for
[46:46] governmental projects, so it's not to be
[46:48] used for utilities or airport. Um it was
[46:51] approved back in 2015.
[46:53] This year, fiscal year 26, our lease
[46:55] revenue going into voter approved
[46:56] funding or voter approved fund is 4.6
[46:59] million. So we're only allowed to spend
[47:01] 1 million. So that fund grows at about
[47:03] $3.6 million annually. So at the end of
[47:06] fiscal year 26, it'll have a fund
[47:08] balance of about $11 million.
[47:13] So another funding source for CIP for
[47:16] fiscal year 27 is our golf course search
[47:18] charges. So these funds come from a
[47:21] percentage of the green piece. Both
[47:23] Boulder Creek and New Golf Course both
[47:25] have a search charge fund and they grow
[47:27] at about $150,000 annually. So, Boulder
[47:30] Creek will use this money for about
[47:32] $126,000 to purchase equipment and MUN
[47:35] golf course will use $290,000 to
[47:38] purchase equipment.
[47:42] So, our proposed enterprise fund
[47:44] spending for fiscal year 27 hasn't
[47:46] changed since we met back in December.
[47:48] The airport fund will be $140,000.
[47:51] The electric fund will be $5 million.
[47:53] The wastewater fund will be $400,000.
[47:56] And the water fund will be 1.4 million.
[48:01] So, our outside funding for fiscal year
[48:03] 27 um includes the regional
[48:06] transportation commission of $1.4
[48:08] million and again this supports our
[48:09] roads and also the federal aviation
[48:11] administration of 1.2 which supports our
[48:15] airport.
[48:18] So, there's only been one change since
[48:19] we met in December with the CIP, and
[48:23] that includes adding the project of the
[48:25] pavilion at the Boulder Creek Golf
[48:26] Course of converting the 7,400 ft²
[48:30] canvas pavilion into a 10,000 ft²
[48:33] permanent building that would include
[48:35] restrooms, a warming kitchen, and bars.
[48:39] So, this cost this project would cost
[48:41] $8.5 million. It would be 100% funded
[48:44] with the redevelopment district funding.
[48:47] So, we would use the current funding of
[48:49] $5 million that's in the RDA and then um
[48:52] 2027 it'd be an additional $1.7 million
[48:55] and then in 287 $750,000 and then in
[48:58] fiscal year 29 when the RDA sunsets
[49:00] there'd be an additional million
[49:01] dollars. So for a total project cost of
[49:04] 8.5 million
[49:07] and the 10,000 footprint
[49:10] um we used
[49:13] the Clark County not oh my gosh Boulder
[49:16] the Boulder Dam Credit Union Gala which
[49:18] is about 400 people and so that's how we
[49:20] um determined that 10,000 square
[49:21] footprint to make sure it could host
[49:23] something like that.
[49:26] » Can I interrupt here mayor and ask a
[49:28] question? Have we talked with our public
[49:31] works department to see if that amount
[49:33] is going to be about the right amount
[49:35] come 2028?
[49:37] >> We have we have a little bit of
[49:41] » We have we have a little bit of
[49:41] inflation put into this for with our
[49:42] current calculations that they have
[49:44] made. But
[49:46] >> if the public works director would like
[49:47] » if the public works director would like
[49:47] to come up, they have definitely been
[49:49] working on this.
[49:50] >> Yeah, I mean that's what we do. We set
[49:51] » Yeah, I mean that's what we do. We set
[49:51] aside money today and realize it's not
[49:53] sufficient in two years, right? So we
[49:54] want to make sure we don't get caught
[49:56] with that. So thank you.
[49:59] >> Thank you.
[50:01] » Thank you.
[50:01] >> Okay. So this is the timeline for our
[50:03] » Okay. So this is the timeline for our
[50:03] capital improvement plan. Today's the
[50:05] 13th and we are looking for tenative
[50:07] approval so we can move forward with our
[50:09] operating budget. Um the CIP plan could
[50:12] come forth any time before final
[50:14] approval of the budget in May. Um but if
[50:17] there's no changes, you won't see it
[50:19] again until final budget approval on May
[50:22] 26th.
[50:24] And I know um
[50:28] in the packet there is a PDF of our
[50:30] digital budget book. If you go to our
[50:32] website bcnv.org/cip2027,
[50:37] there is the digital um CIP book. It's
[50:40] much more user friendly and easier to
[50:41] navigate. And if you want to u look in
[50:43] deeper into any of the projects or
[50:45] funding sources, it's a great resource.
[50:48] And also if there's ever any questions
[50:49] on CIP, uh, anyone can email cipbcnv.org
[50:55] and I'm happy to answer any questions.
[50:57] >> Questions?
[51:00] » Questions?
[51:00] >> Thank you for all that. I think I was
[51:02] » Thank you for all that. I think I was
[51:02] keeping up with you, but I do have um
[51:04] just a clarification if you could
[51:06] between the CIP and the voter approval
[51:09] fund and you mentioned $11 million. Can
[51:13] you put those three into context?
[51:16] So,
[51:18] the charter states we have to put 20% of
[51:20] all lease revenue into a CIP fund. That
[51:24] CIP fund, we've named it the voter
[51:26] approved capital improvement fund. So,
[51:27] it grows at the $3.6 million annually.
[51:30] And so, at the end of this year, it'll
[51:31] be $11 million. We also have an
[51:33] acquisitions and improvement fund, which
[51:35] is our working um capital improvement
[51:38] fund really where all the CIP
[51:39] governmental CIP projects happen. And
[51:42] then of course with the utilities and
[51:43] airport those would all occur in their
[51:46] own individual funds.
[51:47] >> So the 11 million that would have any of
[51:49] » So the 11 million that would have any of
[51:49] that money that would be spent from that
[51:51] is that something that has to go to the
[51:52] voters?
[51:53] >> Yes.
[51:54] » Yes.
[51:54] >> Okay.
[51:54] » Okay.
[51:54] >> So none of that money can be spent
[51:55] » So none of that money can be spent
[51:55] without voter approval.
[51:57] >> Okay. Can you give me um an idea of what
[52:01] » Okay. Can you give me um an idea of what
[52:01] that a project that could be used?
[52:04] >> So a recent one was the pool. We had two
[52:07] » So a recent one was the pool. We had two
[52:07] questions go out um to the voters. one
[52:08] was for $7 million to assist with
[52:11] building the pool and then there was
[52:12] additional um question of up to $9
[52:14] million. So that's um a great project
[52:17] for we let can let those fun um funds
[52:20] build until we have a large project like
[52:21] that.
[52:22] >> Okay. Thank you.
[52:23] » Okay. Thank you.
[52:23] >> Mhm.
[52:28] » I want to clarify if I could my I'm
[52:30] sorry. Were you going to ask a question?
[52:31] Right.
[52:32] >> I was No, I will defer. I'm blurted out.
[52:34] » I was No, I will defer. I'm blurted out.
[52:34] Sorry.
[52:34] >> I just was going to say thank you. Thank
[52:36] » I just was going to say thank you. Thank
[52:36] you for all the hard work. Great job.
[52:38] Thank you. Thanks.
[52:39] >> That's it. I'm done.
[52:41] » That's it. I'm done.
[52:41] >> If I may. Sorry, there was a long pause.
[52:44] » If I may. Sorry, there was a long pause.
[52:44] I thought there was no more. Um, did I
[52:46] hear you say then that this that the CIP
[52:51] U plan uh will not be brought in a
[52:54] public meeting again until the approval
[52:57] date in May
[52:58] >> unless there's any request for changes.
[53:01] » unless there's any request for changes.
[53:01] as we go through the operating budget,
[53:03] there's always that opportunity,
[53:04] especially if there's a change on any of
[53:06] our projects or a request to change
[53:07] anything because also during that our
[53:09] operating budget will request to make
[53:11] the transfers to pay for the CIP
[53:13] projects. So, it won't maybe not its own
[53:17] individual meeting, but the topic will
[53:20] there'll be opportunity to make changes.
[53:21] >> Okay. Thanks.
[53:22] » Okay. Thanks.
[53:22] >> Yes.
[53:22] » Yes.
[53:22] >> Thanks, Mayor.
[53:23] » Thanks, Mayor.
[53:23] >> Mayor, may I also comment on council
[53:25] » Mayor, may I also comment on council
[53:25] member Balton's question? uh what I
[53:28] might offer to this this question has
[53:30] come up a couple times. So um there
[53:32] several months between now and then. So
[53:34] what I I could offer is in our monthly
[53:36] one-on-one my monthly monthly one-on-one
[53:39] meetings with you, I can put this as an
[53:41] item and we can talk through those
[53:43] projects again and then if you have
[53:44] additional things then uh we we we would
[53:47] like to give the I guess what I'm saying
[53:48] is I'd like to give the council an
[53:50] opportunity for a more in-depth
[53:51] discussion on those CIP projects. If you
[53:53] would like to do that, we can do that in
[53:55] the our meetings.
[53:57] What he's trying to say is that can
[53:59] happen individually, not as a group,
[54:01] because otherwise we would have to
[54:03] agendaize it.
[54:05] And go ahead,
[54:08] >> though. I can ask this in the meeting. I
[54:10] » though. I can ask this in the meeting. I
[54:10] I will ask it here. With the pavilion
[54:12] being um the new thing that's funded
[54:15] through the RDA monies um up to 2029,
[54:18] are we seeing that as the projected
[54:20] completion is 2029 or are we planning on
[54:23] starting that prior to that? How does
[54:25] that look?
[54:26] >> It would depend with RFPs like the Well,
[54:30] » It would depend with RFPs like the Well,
[54:30] the $5 million that would be in fiscal
[54:32] year 26
[54:33] >> has not been approved by the RDA board.
[54:35] » has not been approved by the RDA board.
[54:35] Like we're giving asking for tenative
[54:38] approval here, but we that would have to
[54:40] be a first step before any of those um
[54:43] funding could be spent. And I mean
[54:45] there's a long process like we'd like to
[54:47] have it done by 2029, but there's
[54:51] many things that would have to happen
[54:53] before.
[54:54] >> Okay. Thank you.
[54:55] » Okay. Thank you.
[54:55] >> What he's trying to say, what she's
[54:57] » What he's trying to say, what she's
[54:57] trying to say is we won't get a bathroom
[55:00] there for three years.
[55:06] » All right. Go ahead.
[55:08] >> Anyone else?
[55:09] » Anyone else?
[55:09] >> No, sir.
[55:10] » No, sir.
[55:10] >> Mr. City,
[55:11] » Mr. City,
[55:12] >> just really quickly just to clarify so
[55:13] » just really quickly just to clarify so
[55:14] that there's no misunderstanding on the
[55:16] the the conversation that I just had
[55:18] with you. Uh yes, I will I I will be
[55:21] happy to speak with you on the CIP
[55:22] projects one-on-one. However, no
[55:25] decisions will be made. So um if there
[55:27] are any that um uh sound good, then I
[55:30] can always bring those back to a meeting
[55:32] uh for a full full disclosure to the
[55:35] other council members. But I just wanted
[55:37] to be I I wanted to be careful that we
[55:40] were not suggesting that I was going to
[55:41] talk to you about other projects and not
[55:43] have them in a public meeting.
[55:44] >> All right. Appreciate it. Thank you. Any
[55:46] » All right. Appreciate it. Thank you. Any
[55:46] other questions?
[55:48] All right. Um,
[55:51] so on that one, do we need anything
[55:53] other than to have a motion to approve
[55:56] the tenative capital improvement plan?
[56:00] >> That's it.
[56:01] » That's it.
[56:01] >> I would accept that motion.
[56:03] » I would accept that motion.
[56:03] >> Move to approve.
[56:05] » Move to approve.
[56:05] >> Second.
[56:06] » Second.
[56:06] >> Seconded. Although any discussion,
[56:10] » Seconded. Although any discussion,
[56:10] all those in favor say I. I. Any oppose?
[56:14] >> That's unanimous. Thank you.
[56:15] » That's unanimous. Thank you.
[56:15] >> Thank you. Thank you.
[56:18] » Thank you. Thank you.
[56:18] That brings us to item 17.
[56:32] » Good evening, mayor and council. Uh
[56:34] Britney Walker, your city attorney here.
[56:36] before you this evening. Item 17 is a
[56:39] resolution approving an agreement
[56:41] between the city of Boulder City and the
[56:43] law firm of Cox and Wilson for
[56:46] prosecutor services. Since 2005, the
[56:49] city has contracted with private law
[56:51] firms to provide the prosecution
[56:52] services.
[56:54] Mr. Gary Booker was our uh prosecutor
[56:57] for 18 years and retired in 2023. Our
[57:01] current prosecutor is Thomas Moscll who
[57:03] has served in this role since June of 23
[57:06] and he was a chief deputy district
[57:08] attorney for Clark County from August 23
[57:11] 2014 through 2021.
[57:15] In August of 2025, Mr. Moscow began
[57:18] working with Justin Wilson of Cox and
[57:20] Wilson Law. And as an aside, Mr. Wilson
[57:22] and his partner Shane Cox are here today
[57:24] if there's any questions for them. Um,
[57:27] and they subcontracted with Mr. Moscow
[57:30] to provide prosecution services. Um, Mr.
[57:33] Moscow does wish to terminate his
[57:34] contract to pursue other endeavors. Um,
[57:37] since the city has been working with Mr.
[57:38] Wilson, who is also an experienced
[57:40] criminal attorney with, um, over 5 years
[57:43] of criminal experience. Uh, he also
[57:45] worked for the Clark County DA's office
[57:46] early in his career, and his resume is
[57:49] provided as a handout tonight. Um he
[57:52] over the past few months has worked uh
[57:54] providing our prosecution services and
[57:56] in that time has processed uh 88 cases
[57:59] resulting in 70 convictions for the
[58:01] city. Uh Mr. Wilson is comfortable in a
[58:04] courtroom and wellversed in criminal
[58:05] procedure investigation, substantive
[58:08] criminal law and roles of evidence. Mr.
[58:10] Wilson's partner Shane Cox is also
[58:12] available to serve in Mr. Wilson'sstead
[58:14] should he be unavailable. Uh Mr. Cox is
[58:17] also an experienced criminal attorney
[58:18] and it will benefit the city to have the
[58:20] additional support of a law firm uh to
[58:23] provide these services. The term of the
[58:25] agreement is two years and additional
[58:27] two additional one-year renewal periods.
[58:29] Um and so before you this agreement and
[58:32] I'm available for any questions and
[58:34] again Mr. Wilson and Mr. Cox are also
[58:36] here if the council has questions for
[58:38] them.
[58:40] >> Any questions that were attorney Denise
[58:43] » Any questions that were attorney Denise
[58:43] can go first?
[58:44] >> Just a clarification. So it's 25 hours
[58:48] » Just a clarification. So it's 25 hours
[58:48] basically for the year.
[58:50] >> No, no, a week.
[58:51] » No, no, a week.
[58:52] >> A week. It's
[58:52] » A week. It's
[58:52] >> Yes, it's up to 25 hours a week.
[58:54] » Yes, it's up to 25 hours a week.
[58:54] >> Okay. So insurance and all that kind of
[58:56] » Okay. So insurance and all that kind of
[58:56] stuff is still under the umbrella of uh
[59:00] Cox and Wilson.
[59:01] >> Yes, they they provide uh malpractice
[59:04] » Yes, they they provide uh malpractice
[59:04] insurance for the services.
[59:05] >> Okay. Thank you.
[59:08] » Okay. Thank you.
[59:08] >> I would like Mr. Cox and Mr. Wilson to
[59:11] » I would like Mr. Cox and Mr. Wilson to
[59:11] come up forward and introduce
[59:12] themselves.
[59:15] And then I have one question for you
[59:17] each.
[59:18] >> Good morning. Justin W. Wilson, Nevada
[59:20] » Good morning. Justin W. Wilson, Nevada
[59:20] Bar number 14646. Shane Cox, Nevada bar
[59:23] number 13852 for those curious.
[59:26] >> Okay. So, you're both attorneys and
[59:28] » Okay. So, you're both attorneys and
[59:28] going to work for us. What is your best
[59:31] attribute
[59:32] >> as an attorney?
[59:33] » as an attorney?
[59:33] >> As an attorney, I think
[59:34] » As an attorney, I think
[59:34] >> not real long, just real quick.
[59:36] » not real long, just real quick.
[59:36] >> I think it's the same as as uh me
[59:38] » I think it's the same as as uh me
[59:38] individually. Um, tenacity. I don't
[59:40] really give up on anything. If I set a
[59:43] goal, I get it.
[59:44] >> Okay. Thank you. And you, sir?
[59:46] » Okay. Thank you. And you, sir?
[59:46] >> We're a good pair because I'm more
[59:48] » We're a good pair because I'm more
[59:48] thoughtful and want to analyze things a
[59:50] little bit longer. U Justin is
[59:52] tenacious. I can say that. And so we
[59:54] balance each other out that way.
[59:56] >> Great answer. Thank you very much.
[59:58] » Great answer. Thank you very much.
[59:58] >> Thank you.
[1:00:00] » Thank you.
[1:00:00] >> Any questions of the two?
[1:00:04] » Any questions of the two?
[1:00:04] >> Perfect.
[1:00:04] » Perfect.
[1:00:04] >> I I can't resist. So, what is your worst
[1:00:07] » I I can't resist. So, what is your worst
[1:00:07] asset?
[1:00:08] >> Oh, man. Um,
[1:00:11] » Oh, man. Um,
[1:00:12] >> okay. I retract that question. It's kind
[1:00:13] » okay. I retract that question. It's kind
[1:00:14] of the same.
[1:00:14] >> Thank you for hesitating.
[1:00:17] » Thank you for hesitating.
[1:00:17] Appreciate it. Any other questions that
[1:00:19] are
[1:00:20] >> pertinent? I'll call them. If not, thank
[1:00:22] » pertinent? I'll call them. If not, thank
[1:00:22] you very much.
[1:00:24] >> Thank you.
[1:00:25] » Thank you.
[1:00:25] >> And so that brings us up to us uh and
[1:00:30] » And so that brings us up to us uh and
[1:00:30] the resolution of 80087. Do I have a
[1:00:33] motion?
[1:00:34] >> I move to approve resolution 8087.
[1:00:38] » I move to approve resolution 8087.
[1:00:38] Is there a second?
[1:00:40] >> I'll second it.
[1:00:41] » I'll second it.
[1:00:41] >> And is there discussion?
[1:00:44] » And is there discussion?
[1:00:44] Seeing no discussion, all those in favor
[1:00:46] say I.
[1:00:48] >> Any oppose say nay. It's unanimous.
[1:00:50] » Any oppose say nay. It's unanimous.
[1:00:50] Thank you. Thank you.
[1:00:54] And then that brings us to item 18,
[1:00:58] matters pertaining to the 2026
[1:01:01] elections.
[1:01:04] >> Yes. Thank you. The first matter before
[1:01:07] » Yes. Thank you. The first matter before
[1:01:07] you is resolution number 80088.
[1:01:10] This is declaring a municipal primary
[1:01:12] election will be held on the 9th day of
[1:01:14] June 2026 and a municipal general
[1:01:17] election will be held on the 3rd day of
[1:01:19] November 2026 in Boulder City. And um as
[1:01:24] a point of reference, we do have to um
[1:01:26] notice this legally notice this prior to
[1:01:29] February 15th. This has already been
[1:01:32] done by the Clark County Election
[1:01:33] Department on behalf of the
[1:01:35] municipalities. It's attached and
[1:01:37] included in the packet.
[1:01:40] And just for the sake of anybody
[1:01:43] watching, um candidate filing
[1:01:46] uh filing fees are set at $25. And our
[1:01:49] filing hours will be uh Monday through
[1:01:52] Thursday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
[1:01:54] beginning March 2nd through March 13th
[1:01:58] and Fridays by appointment.
[1:02:02] And so I would ask the council to please
[1:02:04] um approve resolution number 80088.
[1:02:08] >> Any questions?
[1:02:10] » Any questions?
[1:02:10] I'll accept a motion.
[1:02:13] Move to approve 8088.
[1:02:15] >> We'll second.
[1:02:16] » We'll second.
[1:02:16] >> Any discussion?
[1:02:18] » Any discussion?
[1:02:18] All those in favor say I. I. Any oppose
[1:02:21] say. It's unanimous. Thank you.
[1:02:23] >> The second matter is um per city council
[1:02:27] » The second matter is um per city council
[1:02:27] rules section 3.1 the council can make a
[1:02:30] motion to reschedu a regularly scheduled
[1:02:33] council meeting. And this year Tuesday,
[1:02:36] June 9th, which would be a regular
[1:02:38] meeting, is also the primary election
[1:02:40] day. So, I am requesting that a motion
[1:02:44] be made to move the council meeting to
[1:02:46] June 8th, 2026.
[1:02:49] >> Is there a motion?
[1:02:51] » Is there a motion?
[1:02:51] >> Move to approve uh rescheduling as
[1:02:54] » Move to approve uh rescheduling as
[1:02:54] indicated on the agenda.
[1:02:57] >> Second.
[1:02:58] » Second.
[1:02:58] >> Any discussion? All those in favor say
[1:03:01] » Any discussion? All those in favor say
[1:03:01] I. I.
[1:03:02] >> Any opposed? Unanimous. Thank you.
[1:03:04] » Any opposed? Unanimous. Thank you.
[1:03:04] >> Thank you. Thank you. And that brings us
[1:03:07] » Thank you. Thank you. And that brings us
[1:03:07] to number 19. Appointment of the mayor
[1:03:11] pro Tim.
[1:03:13] >> Can I nominate Sherry Jorgensson?
[1:03:17] » Can I nominate Sherry Jorgensson?
[1:03:17] >> Can I second it?
[1:03:19] » Can I second it?
[1:03:19] >> Moved and seconded to nominate Sher
[1:03:21] » Moved and seconded to nominate Sher
[1:03:21] Jorgensson who's our current mayor prom.
[1:03:24] Is there any other NE nomination or can
[1:03:27] I just say all those in favor?
[1:03:31] >> All those in all those in favor say I.
[1:03:33] » All those in all those in favor say I.
[1:03:33] I.
[1:03:34] >> Any opposed? And I'm glad there's nobody
[1:03:36] » Any opposed? And I'm glad there's nobody
[1:03:36] opposed. It's so done unanimously. Thank
[1:03:39] you. Thank you, Councilwoman Jorgensson.
[1:03:43] For those of you who haven't noticed,
[1:03:45] she keeps me straight or at least tries
[1:03:48] to. So, I appreciate what you do. Thank
[1:03:51] you.
[1:03:52] Um, that brings us to number 20.
[1:03:56] >> Yes. So, this matter is um an
[1:03:59] » Yes. So, this matter is um an
[1:03:59] appointment to the Southern Nevada
[1:04:01] Council of Governments. A couple months
[1:04:03] back, the council um approved an
[1:04:05] agreement with them. And the purpose of
[1:04:08] the Southern Nevada Council of
[1:04:09] Governments is to cooperatively address
[1:04:11] regional issues, identify common needs,
[1:04:14] coordinate government services and
[1:04:16] responsibilities, engage in
[1:04:18] comprehensive regional policy planning,
[1:04:20] and to assist members in the conduct of
[1:04:22] their affairs. This council um is
[1:04:26] co-terminus which means whoever is
[1:04:29] appointed and
[1:04:31] to this particular committee they will
[1:04:33] serve on this board for the remaining
[1:04:36] term of their their membership as as a
[1:04:39] council member and Boulder City has one
[1:04:42] representative and that is in their
[1:04:45] rules for governing board. So one
[1:04:46] representative of each member whose
[1:04:49] population is less than 200,000. At this
[1:04:52] time, the meetings haven't actually been
[1:04:54] set, but they're waiting until um April
[1:04:57] when this actual board will take effect,
[1:04:59] and then they'll have a meeting to set
[1:05:01] up regularly scheduled meetings. So, at
[1:05:04] this time, it's unknown.
[1:05:05] >> Thank you. Uh is there anyone on council
[1:05:09] » Thank you. Uh is there anyone on council
[1:05:09] who would like to do this?
[1:05:11] >> Can I nominate Denise?
[1:05:14] » Can I nominate Denise?
[1:05:14] >> I'll second it.
[1:05:15] » I'll second it.
[1:05:15] >> So, it's been it's been moved and
[1:05:18] » So, it's been it's been moved and
[1:05:18] seconded to nominate. I don't think I
[1:05:21] could second myself, but
[1:05:23] >> I will.
[1:05:23] » I will.
[1:05:23] >> You're seconding a motion? Yes, you can.
[1:05:25] » You're seconding a motion? Yes, you can.
[1:05:25] >> Oh, good. Okay.
[1:05:26] » Oh, good. Okay.
[1:05:26] >> So, we will uh we have a nomination and
[1:05:29] » So, we will uh we have a nomination and
[1:05:29] a second to nominate Councilwoman Ashers
[1:05:32] to that uh board. Those in favor or is
[1:05:36] there any discussion?
[1:05:38] Those in favor say I. I.
[1:05:40] >> I.
[1:05:41] » I.
[1:05:41] >> Any opposed? It's unanimous again. Thank
[1:05:43] » Any opposed? It's unanimous again. Thank
[1:05:43] you.
[1:05:45] And that brings us to
[1:05:48] number 21.
[1:05:50] Um, city council appointments for first
[1:05:54] uh historic preservation commission.
[1:05:56] Madame city clerk.
[1:05:58] >> Yes. Thank you. So the first um item on
[1:06:00] » Yes. Thank you. So the first um item on
[1:06:00] here is the appointment to historic
[1:06:02] preservation. There's two appointments
[1:06:04] needed. Uh one is to serve a remaining
[1:06:08] term which expires August 31st, 2027.
[1:06:12] And then we have a second term which
[1:06:14] would expire 8312028
[1:06:21] » of the same historic preservation.
[1:06:23] >> Correct. Both.
[1:06:23] » Correct. Both.
[1:06:24] >> So we need two
[1:06:25] » So we need two
[1:06:25] >> two. They would just serve different
[1:06:26] » two. They would just serve different
[1:06:26] terms.
[1:06:27] >> Okay.
[1:06:27] » Okay.
[1:06:27] >> So we could start out if you wanted um
[1:06:30] » So we could start out if you wanted um
[1:06:30] with the first one which would would be
[1:06:31] appointing somebody to the term which
[1:06:33] would expire 8:31 2027.
[1:06:38] » And so is there a nomination? We have a
[1:06:42] a
[1:06:43] bunch of people who have been willing to
[1:06:47] do that. Is there a nomination from that
[1:06:49] group or any other person that someone
[1:06:52] would not like to nominate for the first
[1:06:55] one that will uh serve until 2027?
[1:06:59] >> I'd like to nominate Don Johnson because
[1:07:01] » I'd like to nominate Don Johnson because
[1:07:01] he has a bachelor's in city planning and
[1:07:03] master in historic preservation and
[1:07:06] planning. And I thought that speaks to
[1:07:08] what the lady that was here said today.
[1:07:10] So, I'd like to nominate uh Don Johnson.
[1:07:13] >> Is there a second?
[1:07:15] » Is there a second?
[1:07:15] >> There's I have a nominee.
[1:07:17] » There's I have a nominee.
[1:07:17] >> Could I Could I put another name in the
[1:07:19] » Could I Could I put another name in the
[1:07:19] hat?
[1:07:20] >> Is there a second to the nomination?
[1:07:21] » Is there a second to the nomination?
[1:07:22] >> We don't need a second. If nominations
[1:07:23] » We don't need a second. If nominations
[1:07:23] are open, we can wait until all the
[1:07:25] nominations are.
[1:07:26] >> So, yes, you can nominate another
[1:07:27] » So, yes, you can nominate another
[1:07:27] person.
[1:07:27] >> Okay. I'd like to uh nominate Bren
[1:07:29] » Okay. I'd like to uh nominate Bren
[1:07:29] Deloreer for the
[1:07:32] two I think it's a year you said or
[1:07:34] follow carry out the last until 2027.
[1:07:38] >> Correct. Okay.
[1:07:40] » Correct. Okay.
[1:07:40] So, we have two nominations. Uh, Don
[1:07:42] Johnson and Brenda Morier. Is there any
[1:07:46] other nomination?
[1:07:48] John David Hancock.
[1:07:52] >> Pardon?
[1:07:52] » Pardon?
[1:07:52] >> John David Hancock. I'm nominating him.
[1:08:00] » All for the same one.
[1:08:03] And so we have three nominations for
[1:08:06] that particular uh position that goes
[1:08:09] until 2027.
[1:08:12] And now you'll talk me through how I do
[1:08:14] that.
[1:08:15] >> Just if no other nominations are
[1:08:17] » Just if no other nominations are
[1:08:18] offered, you can just close the
[1:08:19] nominations and then we'll just you'll
[1:08:20] have to take a vote on each of the three
[1:08:22] members.
[1:08:23] >> Okay.
[1:08:24] » Okay.
[1:08:24] >> Remembering that you can only vote once.
[1:08:26] » Remembering that you can only vote once.
[1:08:26] >> So the uh we if there are no other
[1:08:29] » So the uh we if there are no other
[1:08:29] nominations, we'll close the nominations
[1:08:31] for that. And we will now uh vote uh for
[1:08:36] in order uh those in favor of Don
[1:08:40] Johnson. And we can only vote once.
[1:08:43] >> I
[1:08:44] » I
[1:08:44] >> I
[1:08:45] » I
[1:08:45] >> I
[1:08:47] » I
[1:08:47] And so that is three.
[1:08:49] >> Three.
[1:08:50] » Three.
[1:08:50] >> We used to call that a majority.
[1:08:54] » Can I say then it's done because we can
[1:08:57] only vote once, right?
[1:08:58] >> You can if it's a majority. Yes.
[1:09:00] » You can if it's a majority. Yes.
[1:09:00] >> So we'll close that. Don Johnson has
[1:09:02] » So we'll close that. Don Johnson has
[1:09:02] thus been duly elected. Um, and then
[1:09:07] we'll open the nominations for
[1:09:12] what's the other one till
[1:09:16] for the
[1:09:16] >> 2028.
[1:09:17] » 2028.
[1:09:17] >> 2028.
[1:09:20] » 2028.
[1:09:20] And so we would have nominations open
[1:09:23] for someone to serve until 2028.
[1:09:27] Uh, is there any nomination for that?
[1:09:30] I'd like to nominate uh David Engelman.
[1:09:34] Uh he's an anthropologist
[1:09:36] and I think that again adds experience
[1:09:38] of aging for the historic committee.
[1:09:42] >> Okay. Are there other nominations?
[1:09:45] » Okay. Are there other nominations?
[1:09:45] >> I'd like to nominate Norma Valley.
[1:09:50] » Any other nominations? And I'll nominate
[1:09:53] uh Dave Hancock again.
[1:10:02] And are there any other nominations? We
[1:10:04] have three nominations.
[1:10:06] Um, and in order to do that, we'll uh
[1:10:11] all those in favor of
[1:10:14] um Engelman,
[1:10:16] uh, say I.
[1:10:18] >> I.
[1:10:21] » I.
[1:10:21] >> All those in favor of Norma Valley say
[1:10:24] » All those in favor of Norma Valley say
[1:10:24] I.
[1:10:25] >> I.
[1:10:25] » I.
[1:10:25] >> I.
[1:10:27] » I.
[1:10:27] That's two. And all those in favor of
[1:10:31] Dave,
[1:10:35] » Hancock,
[1:10:36] >> Hancock,
[1:10:39] say I.
[1:10:40] >> I.
[1:10:41] » I.
[1:10:41] >> That is two.
[1:10:44] » That is two.
[1:10:44] >> Yeah. So, they're got to do it over
[1:10:46] » Yeah. So, they're got to do it over
[1:10:46] again.
[1:10:47] >> We have a tie uh between Norma Valley
[1:10:50] » We have a tie uh between Norma Valley
[1:10:50] and Dave Hancock. Um, and we will do
[1:10:55] this again. Uh, all those I'll take uh
[1:10:58] in reverse order Dave Hancock. All those
[1:11:02] in favor of Dave Hancock say I
[1:11:04] >> I I
[1:11:08] » I I
[1:11:08] that was enough.
[1:11:09] >> I have Walton. Did somebody else say I?
[1:11:11] » I have Walton. Did somebody else say I?
[1:11:11] >> I did.
[1:11:12] » I did.
[1:11:12] >> I did.
[1:11:12] » I did.
[1:11:12] >> Yeah.
[1:11:13] » Yeah.
[1:11:13] >> Okay.
[1:11:14] » Okay.
[1:11:14] >> And I did too.
[1:11:15] » And I did too.
[1:11:15] >> So we had four say for Dave Hancock and
[1:11:20] » So we had four say for Dave Hancock and
[1:11:20] that is resolved. that is he is
[1:11:23] nominated
[1:11:25] and he will serve till the or the 28th
[1:11:30] uh time frame.
[1:11:35] And then that brings us to the regional
[1:11:38] flood districts
[1:11:40] uh citizen advisory committee.
[1:11:45] Do we have
[1:11:49] a flood person? There's yeah there
[1:11:51] there's one person and he currently
[1:11:53] serves on the board um Jason Gross and
[1:11:57] it's been requested by the board that he
[1:11:58] remain on it. He's a contributing member
[1:12:01] to their board and we have no other
[1:12:02] applications.
[1:12:04] >> So is somebody nominating Jason?
[1:12:06] » So is somebody nominating Jason?
[1:12:06] >> I nominate Jason Gross.
[1:12:09] » I nominate Jason Gross.
[1:12:09] >> And is any other nominations?
[1:12:13] » And is any other nominations?
[1:12:13] If there are no other nominations then
[1:12:15] it's de facto.
[1:12:18] So he has been reappointed. Thank you.
[1:12:22] >> And that brings us to the city manager's
[1:12:24] » And that brings us to the city manager's
[1:12:24] report.
[1:12:28] » Or somebody's
[1:12:29] >> item 22.
[1:12:30] » item 22.
[1:12:30] >> Yeah, the city manager's report on
[1:12:33] » Yeah, the city manager's report on
[1:12:33] there.
[1:12:33] >> Oh, it does say city manager report. So,
[1:12:36] » Oh, it does say city manager report. So,
[1:12:36] there's multiple city managers reports
[1:12:38] on this one.
[1:12:39] >> I'm going to round us out with reports.
[1:12:43] » I'm going to round us out with reports.
[1:12:43] >> I can only read three words at a time.
[1:12:47] » I can only read three words at a time.
[1:12:47] >> Thank you, mayor. Again, I'm city
[1:12:49] » Thank you, mayor. Again, I'm city
[1:12:49] manager Ned Thomas. Item number 22,
[1:12:52] agenda item 22 is noted in the agenda is
[1:12:55] my report as city manager on the
[1:12:58] non-binding factfinders report including
[1:13:00] findings and recommendations and
[1:13:02] associated fiscal impacts related to the
[1:13:05] collective bargaining agreement or
[1:13:06] collective bargaining negotiations and
[1:13:09] then impass between the city and the
[1:13:11] international association of
[1:13:12] firefighters local 5073. Uh this report
[1:13:16] to you is required under NRS 20 uh
[1:13:19] 288.2000
[1:13:22] subsection 8. Um as noted in the staff
[1:13:25] report uh just a little bit of
[1:13:26] background the collective bargaining
[1:13:28] agreement between the city and IAFF
[1:13:31] local 5073 expired on June 30th 2025.
[1:13:35] The parties unfortunately were unable to
[1:13:37] negotiate a successor agreement and uh
[1:13:40] we mutually agreed to go to non-binding
[1:13:42] factf finding to seek third an
[1:13:44] independent review and third party input
[1:13:47] on resolving the areas of disagreement
[1:13:50] and we received this factfinders report
[1:13:52] on December 23rd 2025 under NRSU uh 288.
[1:13:58] uh the city council must hold a um there
[1:14:01] must hold a public meeting and for the
[1:14:04] within 45 days of receiving that report.
[1:14:06] So we're here before you tonight to
[1:14:08] present the report and that would
[1:14:10] include a discussion of three different
[1:14:12] items. First item is uh what are the
[1:14:15] issues uh of disagreement and uh between
[1:14:19] the two parties. The second item is a
[1:14:21] report of the findings and the
[1:14:23] recommendations of the factfinder. And
[1:14:25] then third uh the overall fiscal impact
[1:14:28] of the findings and the recommendation.
[1:14:30] But in in talking about those uh the
[1:14:33] fiscal impact the council uh the statute
[1:14:36] does not allow the council to dis
[1:14:38] discuss additional details about the
[1:14:40] report in relation to fiscal. It's a
[1:14:42] little bit confusing but essentially I'm
[1:14:45] here to provide you with this is these
[1:14:46] were the issues that we talked about.
[1:14:49] This these are the recommendations and
[1:14:50] findings of the factfinder and these are
[1:14:52] the fiscal impacts. So I'll go through
[1:14:54] each one of those in just a little bit
[1:14:56] of detail. So first the first first item
[1:14:58] the the issues submitted to the
[1:15:00] arbitrator. Uh first one is regarding
[1:15:03] wage increases. The second one was
[1:15:05] related to pay for what is called a
[1:15:07] preceptor or mentor pay. This is when
[1:15:09] one of our full-time firefighters steps
[1:15:11] in or is given an additional assignment
[1:15:13] to mentor one of the the junior or cadet
[1:15:16] uh firefighters. I don't know if that's
[1:15:18] the exactly the correct term. And then
[1:15:21] third uh what type of revolved around
[1:15:24] incentive pay for both hazmat additional
[1:15:26] certifications that the firefighters
[1:15:28] receive for uh hazardous materials
[1:15:30] training as well as what is called a
[1:15:32] technical rescue training certification
[1:15:35] and I'll I'll talk about each of those
[1:15:37] in just a moment. So those were the
[1:15:39] three issues. uh and now I'll the next
[1:15:42] part I'll tell you about the findings
[1:15:44] and the recommendation of the factfinder
[1:15:46] um
[1:15:49] under wage increases uh in addition to
[1:15:52] the wage itself there were some issues
[1:15:55] around the term of the agreement how
[1:15:57] many years would the agreement be and
[1:15:59] also retroactivity so we're past the
[1:16:02] time when the the old uh collective
[1:16:04] bargaining agreement expired we're into
[1:16:06] the new one but we haven't reached an
[1:16:08] agreement so um what uh when do the new
[1:16:11] when will the new terms start? So um on
[1:16:14] that regard uh the factfinder found that
[1:16:17] there a term of 3 years as proposed by
[1:16:20] the city would be appropriate. So uh
[1:16:23] factfinder's recommendation that we um
[1:16:25] consider a non-binding uh factf finding
[1:16:28] but we would consider 3 years the uh the
[1:16:32] new agreement then would be effective
[1:16:34] from July 31st 2025 through June 30th
[1:16:37] 2028.
[1:16:38] On the next item related to wages
[1:16:40] themselves, uh in year 1 there would be
[1:16:43] a wage increase of 4.375%.
[1:16:47] In year two and in year three, the w any
[1:16:50] wage increase would be based upon the
[1:16:52] consumer price index or CPI. And uh but
[1:16:56] we would uh the proposal included both a
[1:16:59] floor and a ceiling or a minimum uh cola
[1:17:03] and a maximum cola and uh minimum would
[1:17:07] be 2.25. 25%. So if it happen if it
[1:17:10] happened that we had a very low CPI that
[1:17:13] year it was only 1.6 they would be
[1:17:15] guaranteed at least 2.25%.
[1:17:17] Likewise like in the in the past year if
[1:17:20] there was a very large increase in the
[1:17:22] CPI uh it would be capped at 3.25%.
[1:17:27] And that would be for year two and
[1:17:28] three. So there would be a wage increase
[1:17:30] in both of those but this gives us the
[1:17:33] uh boundaries of in which that increase
[1:17:36] would fall.
[1:17:38] Uh with regard to retroactivity, the
[1:17:40] factfinder recommended as proposed by
[1:17:44] the IAFF that it be retroactive to July
[1:17:47] 30, July 1st, 2025. So the beginning of
[1:17:50] the contract, the the new contract
[1:17:52] retroactivity. And then with regard to
[1:17:55] preceptor and mentor compensation, uh it
[1:17:59] the factfinder recommended it to be $50
[1:18:02] per shift for the duration of the
[1:18:04] assignment. And again, that would be
[1:18:06] effective during the term of this
[1:18:08] agreement. So, $50 per shift if you're
[1:18:11] serving as a mentor. And then, uh,
[1:18:13] finally, with regard to the incentive
[1:18:16] pay that I mentioned related to
[1:18:17] hazardous
[1:18:20] additional certifications, uh, for
[1:18:22] handling or addressing, uh, emergencies
[1:18:24] related to hazardous materials and
[1:18:26] technical rescue training. Um it uh
[1:18:30] FactFinder recommended that the
[1:18:32] employees who have obtained and
[1:18:34] maintained certification in hazardous
[1:18:36] material technician and so there uh you
[1:18:39] had to do these together uh a technical
[1:18:42] rescue certification uh related to
[1:18:45] vehicle and machinery um technician that
[1:18:48] would be paid an additional 2% above
[1:18:51] their um hourly rate. And then in
[1:18:55] addition to that there are other type
[1:18:57] there three other types of technical
[1:18:59] rescue uh certification. Those are
[1:19:03] swiftwater rescue, high low angle rope
[1:19:06] rescue and wilderness rescue. All of
[1:19:08] those uh which are appropriate to our
[1:19:11] geography here and the special needs of
[1:19:14] Boulder City. And so if uh the the
[1:19:17] factfinder recommended that if the
[1:19:19] employees receive those any of those
[1:19:21] additional certifications that in
[1:19:24] addition to the 2% for hazmat and
[1:19:26] vehicle machinery rescue they would
[1:19:28] receive one an additional 1% for up to
[1:19:31] three other uh three other TRT or
[1:19:35] technical rescue certifications for a
[1:19:37] total of 5%.
[1:19:41] A potential uh total of 5%. And then
[1:19:43] finally, the third item in the fiscal
[1:19:45] impact of this um for the overall
[1:19:48] three-year contract would be 1 point uh
[1:19:51] well, excuse me, 1,483,84349.
[1:19:56] That would be total in both wages and
[1:19:59] benefits based on the conditions that I
[1:20:02] just described to you with regard to
[1:20:04] wage increases and hazmat and and the
[1:20:08] other special compensations for
[1:20:09] mentoring or or preceptor pay.
[1:20:13] So uh again un uh my report and the
[1:20:17] structure of that information I've
[1:20:18] shared with you is outlined or given in
[1:20:21] the NRS. Um I'm happy and so this is
[1:20:24] more of an information for the council
[1:20:26] of um how the factfinder uh factf
[1:20:29] finding process worked what the results
[1:20:32] were and I'm happy to answer any
[1:20:33] questions. However, no action is needed
[1:20:35] on this item.
[1:20:37] >> So the factf finder we know what it is.
[1:20:41] » So the factf finder we know what it is.
[1:20:41] We know what it is. Now it's up to you
[1:20:45] or the team to figure out if they want
[1:20:49] to just accept this or go forward with
[1:20:52] looking at some other option.
[1:20:55] >> That's correct. It it came back uh
[1:20:57] » That's correct. It it came back uh
[1:20:57] non-binding factf finding and it came
[1:20:59] back to us and that gives us now a
[1:21:01] framework to continue to the
[1:21:02] negotiations which we will do.
[1:21:05] >> And you're not looking for us to say
[1:21:08] » And you're not looking for us to say
[1:21:08] anything?
[1:21:09] >> No. just answer any questions you might
[1:21:11] » No. just answer any questions you might
[1:21:11] have or it's it's for a discussion among
[1:21:13] the council if you have discussion among
[1:21:15] yourselves as well.
[1:21:17] >> So do we have discussion?
[1:21:19] » So do we have discussion?
[1:21:19] >> No.
[1:21:23] » Okay.
[1:21:24] >> I don't hear anybody saying he wants to
[1:21:26] » I don't hear anybody saying he wants to
[1:21:26] or she wants to say anything.
[1:21:30] >> I will add I think it's approp because I
[1:21:32] » I will add I think it's approp because I
[1:21:32] always like to share positive
[1:21:33] information without going into a lot of
[1:21:35] detail. This has been very helpful to us
[1:21:37] and we appreciate the work of both the
[1:21:39] factfinder and um the response from the
[1:21:42] IFFF members and we look forward to
[1:21:44] hopefully concluding a uh fair and uh
[1:21:48] reasonable solution with a bargaining
[1:21:51] agreement with them very soon.
[1:21:53] >> So unless we say otherwise this is the
[1:21:56] » So unless we say otherwise this is the
[1:21:56] kind of thing that you will present to
[1:21:58] the other party.
[1:22:00] >> Correct.
[1:22:02] » Correct.
[1:22:02] >> Yeah.
[1:22:02] » Yeah.
[1:22:02] >> Any other things that I need to say or
[1:22:04] » Any other things that I need to say or
[1:22:04] do?
[1:22:06] Thank you.
[1:22:06] >> Thank you.
[1:22:10] » That brings us to the city manager
[1:22:12] report.
[1:22:15] » Should have just stayed up there, I
[1:22:16] guess. Yeah,
[1:22:18] >> I can do three words again.
[1:22:20] » I can do three words again.
[1:22:20] >> Yeah, the first one is the report uh
[1:22:21] » Yeah, the first one is the report uh
[1:22:22] claims paid report. Uh this is available
[1:22:24] online and there is no nothing unusual
[1:22:25] in the report.
[1:22:27] >> And any questions?
[1:22:30] » And any questions?
[1:22:30] And that brings us to number 24, city
[1:22:32] manager report. And also the same for
[1:22:35] this, it's the monthly uh financial
[1:22:37] report. You will notice on the agenda,
[1:22:39] it's unodudited. Tonight you receive the
[1:22:41] full audited report. Once we close the
[1:22:42] books, next year will audit. But on a
[1:22:44] monthly basis, we provide that report to
[1:22:46] the council and to the public in an
[1:22:49] unodudited form.
[1:22:50] >> Any questions?
[1:22:53] » Any questions?
[1:22:53] >> Seeing none, that will bring us to
[1:22:55] » Seeing none, that will bring us to
[1:22:55] public comment. Open up public comment.
[1:22:57] Anyone here in chambers welcome to come
[1:23:00] forward. And is there anyone on the
[1:23:03] line? If there are, come at 7025899629.
[1:23:11] Go ahead.
[1:23:13] Good evening again, council, mayor,
[1:23:15] staff, ladies and gentlemen. Um,
[1:23:20] just kind of furthering my comment from
[1:23:22] earlier in regards to the HPC committee.
[1:23:25] Um, I just kind of want to hit it over
[1:23:29] the head with a hammer again that
[1:23:31] unfortunately um the committee members
[1:23:34] that now make up the the new committee
[1:23:38] still don't represent even 50% um
[1:23:43] being seated at the historic table from
[1:23:47] um either a resident or ownership
[1:23:49] standard. Um and I I really kind of feel
[1:23:53] like
[1:23:55] I've been up here over the last couple
[1:23:58] years advocating that that committee be
[1:24:01] made up of at least 50% uh voting
[1:24:03] members that actually represent the
[1:24:06] historic district. And I think it's um
[1:24:09] uh while I can, you know, Dave is is an
[1:24:12] incredible um asset to the historic
[1:24:16] district um living at the fringe and in
[1:24:18] a very historic home. Um I I I still
[1:24:22] feel like we're really falling short on
[1:24:24] representing your constituents that
[1:24:25] actually make up the historic district
[1:24:29] um in in such a capacity and that their
[1:24:32] voices are heard. I mean, the the
[1:24:34] committee and and this council um
[1:24:37] continue to um
[1:24:39] form obviously opinions and um
[1:24:43] designations and and and plans for what
[1:24:47] the historic district is and should be
[1:24:49] and how to preserve it. Um and yet there
[1:24:52] still isn't uh uh two voting members on
[1:24:55] the committee that um
[1:24:58] that are part of that decision making.
[1:25:01] So, I just want to remind you guys and
[1:25:03] and the rest of everybody who's watching
[1:25:06] um that that should really be something
[1:25:08] that you guys should try be trying to
[1:25:10] achieve and um bring a little more of
[1:25:13] the voice of the actual historic
[1:25:15] district to the historic committee.
[1:25:18] Thank you so much.
[1:25:20] >> Thank you.
[1:25:22] » Thank you.
[1:25:22] If anyone's going to call in 7025899629
[1:25:27] and if no one's calling in, we'll still
[1:25:30] invite other people to come up if they'd
[1:25:32] like to say something in the public
[1:25:34] comment which is open to anything. Um,
[1:25:39] we had somebody earlier who was here but
[1:25:43] didn't get the chance. So, we're going
[1:25:45] to wait a little longer. uh see if he
[1:25:50] can call in at 7025899629.
[1:25:56] There is a little bit of a delay. So
[1:25:59] there um we'll continue to wait.
[1:26:03] 7025899629.
[1:26:21] And this public comment can be about
[1:26:23] anything.
[1:26:25] Doesn't have to be related to the uh
[1:26:28] things that are on the agenda.
[1:26:30] 7025899629
[1:26:37] and that phone number is picked up by
[1:26:39] our city clerk and then is broadcast to
[1:26:42] the chambers
[1:26:45] so we all would hear it. 7025899629.
[1:26:52] No one on the phone.
[1:26:59] See, no one on the phone and no one here
[1:27:02] in chambers. We will close public
[1:27:04] comment and go to city council's report
[1:27:08] and we'll start at my far right.
[1:27:11] Councilman Walton.
[1:27:15] Thank you. Um
[1:27:18] on the uh convention and visitors
[1:27:21] authority front, there's been a massive
[1:27:24] renovation
[1:27:26] u at the uh convention and visitors
[1:27:28] authority over the last few years and it
[1:27:31] was completed and ribbons cut uh just in
[1:27:35] time for uh the largest or one of
[1:27:39] certainly the largest uh conventions we
[1:27:41] have here, CES, Consumer Electronic
[1:27:43] Show. And so the uh the product the the
[1:27:48] um the renovations turned out fantastic
[1:27:51] and high marks from attendees
[1:27:54] and it really uh continues to place Las
[1:27:58] Vegas as a premier destination for
[1:28:01] leisure sports and conventions. And of
[1:28:06] course CES uh was here recently and very
[1:28:09] successful. Uh that's all I have there.
[1:28:12] And then as far as the uh water
[1:28:14] authority report um by mid
[1:28:19] February the states
[1:28:22] are supposed to get together and come up
[1:28:24] with a new plan the basin states and
[1:28:26] that there's really not been any
[1:28:29] reported progress in that. So, uh the uh
[1:28:33] federal government has said if if you
[1:28:35] don't come to an agreement, now they
[1:28:37] have pushed off the time frame for that
[1:28:40] a couple of times already. We don't know
[1:28:42] if they'll hold to this middle of
[1:28:44] February firmly or loosely, but um in
[1:28:48] any case, we expect there will likely be
[1:28:51] uh requests for additional cuts amongst
[1:28:55] all of the basin states.
[1:28:58] Uh Nevada receives roughly 2% of the
[1:29:03] entire allocation of the Colorado River
[1:29:06] flow.
[1:29:07] Um and of our 2%
[1:29:11] I'm going to switch to a fraction now.
[1:29:13] We consumed or are expecting to consume
[1:29:17] 2/3 of our allocation. So we have a
[1:29:20] cushion. It's not a large cushion, but
[1:29:23] um we expect to be able to um continue
[1:29:28] to uh survive and thrive if uh if and
[1:29:31] when additional cuts might be made to
[1:29:33] the larger picture. Um, we are part of
[1:29:38] the lower basin states. Um, and Arizona
[1:29:42] and Mexico, not a basin state, but a
[1:29:46] certainly a part a participant and a
[1:29:48] partner in the Colorado River decisions.
[1:29:51] Um, between their cuts and our cuts,
[1:29:55] there's going to be 600 roughly 630,000
[1:29:59] acre feet. Now, that's double of what
[1:30:02] our entire allocation is. So that
[1:30:05] indicates Arizona and Mexico are going
[1:30:08] to cut a whole lot more than we already
[1:30:10] are, which is 21,000 acre feet off of
[1:30:13] our 300,000. So anyway, um the bottom
[1:30:16] line is we're um we're still um
[1:30:20] operating with high return flow credits,
[1:30:23] which allows us to draw out more than
[1:30:26] our actual allocation. But since we're
[1:30:28] returning it, we can continue to keep
[1:30:30] that closed loop cycle and our actual
[1:30:33] consumption is still only about
[1:30:35] twothirds of our allocation. So that's
[1:30:37] my report. Thanks
[1:30:39] >> you. Appreciate it.
[1:30:42] » you. Appreciate it.
[1:30:42] >> Um I really have nothing to report my
[1:30:45] » Um I really have nothing to report my
[1:30:45] Clark County debt management
[1:30:47] uh council because they trying to get
[1:30:50] into the new year. So hopefully next
[1:30:53] month.
[1:30:59] » I I just wanted to thank Boulder City. I
[1:31:01] basically every year you make a New
[1:31:04] Year's resolution and I've never kept
[1:31:06] one yet, but I feel so blessed living
[1:31:08] here in Boulder City and that's I just
[1:31:11] want to reach out and say how thankful I
[1:31:14] am that I have a small business that's
[1:31:16] all family and I have wonderful friends
[1:31:19] in Boulder City and everybody on the
[1:31:21] city council. It's been great and the
[1:31:24] staff down here I feel like I've they're
[1:31:26] family to me. So, I am so blessed to be
[1:31:30] in Boulder City and I'm just looking
[1:31:32] forward to working with everybody and
[1:31:35] especially everybody in Boulder City and
[1:31:37] how I appreciate them and appreciate all
[1:31:40] you guys. Thank you. That's what I had
[1:31:41] to report.
[1:31:45] » So, uh most of Americans were tuned in
[1:31:47] today to the Supreme Court hearing um
[1:31:50] which is the highest court in the land.
[1:31:52] And I'd like to point out that the same
[1:31:54] integrity and desire for right to be
[1:31:56] done, I believe, is is on its dis. Uh we
[1:32:00] can't compare obviously to the Supreme
[1:32:02] Court, but we try to strive for the
[1:32:04] truth in what we do and to get a a fair
[1:32:08] um and equitable decision and everything
[1:32:10] that we do. And I I know I speak for
[1:32:12] myself and the other four members. Um
[1:32:14] it's always my honor to serve in any
[1:32:16] capacity that I find myself in,
[1:32:18] especially here in Boulder City. Um, but
[1:32:21] specifically, I I want to thank uh
[1:32:23] everyone for selecting me as the um
[1:32:26] Southern Nevada uh Council of Government
[1:32:28] Representative for Boulder City. I I I
[1:32:32] think that's really important. I'm also
[1:32:34] on the uh civilian military council
[1:32:36] executive committee and this year
[1:32:38] Boulder City, we are the elected chairs
[1:32:42] for that committee. We meet quarterly
[1:32:44] and uh we talk about different issues
[1:32:46] with the military and military families.
[1:32:49] Um I'm also on the Nevada Legal Cities
[1:32:52] and so these are three um boards that
[1:32:56] have a lot of input and a lot of say. So
[1:32:58] even though we're small, we give our
[1:33:00] input from Boulder City and we have a
[1:33:02] seat at the table to make a difference
[1:33:04] in Southern Nevada, all of Nevada, I
[1:33:06] would say. So I just want to thank you
[1:33:08] again for electing me uh for the uh COG
[1:33:12] and I look forward always uh with the
[1:33:14] military council. Um it's it's it's my
[1:33:17] goal to lean into current and future
[1:33:21] pressing issues, issues that will be
[1:33:22] addressed with the military civil and
[1:33:24] civilian communities. Um like attaining
[1:33:28] housing uh attainable housing, drone
[1:33:31] incursions. The military uh has a
[1:33:34] somewhat of a cclick fix like we have
[1:33:36] see something, say something. They have
[1:33:38] a lot of drone in uh incursions. Those
[1:33:41] are um the drones are mostly the
[1:33:43] recreational ones that people use, but
[1:33:46] they're asking our uh help for that.
[1:33:48] Obviously, we know AI and data centers
[1:33:50] are on the docket of everyone in
[1:33:53] government across the nation. So, we'll
[1:33:55] be talking about things like that. And
[1:33:58] um if there's any questions or issues on
[1:34:00] these boards or any local issues, please
[1:34:03] uh reach out to me. I'm available. I
[1:34:06] also uh want to remind everyone that uh
[1:34:08] talk about historic preservation that
[1:34:11] Boulder City's historic preservation
[1:34:13] popup ask the expert meeting is on
[1:34:15] January 20th. Good opportunity to meet
[1:34:18] with this residents that live in that
[1:34:20] area and their concerns. Um I I know um
[1:34:24] there may not be that proportion of
[1:34:27] representative on the commission, but I
[1:34:29] hope they have these maybe quarterly
[1:34:31] meetings so that at least the voices can
[1:34:34] be heard. And so everybody who's going
[1:34:35] to be involved in that or who can make
[1:34:37] it on January 20th at one o'clock, uh,
[1:34:40] please show up. And I just want to say
[1:34:42] happy New Year's to everyone. We have an
[1:34:45] exciting 2026 that's coming our way. And
[1:34:47] I hope we enjoy it.
[1:34:50] >> Thank you. I will say that uh this is
[1:34:54] » Thank you. I will say that uh this is
[1:34:54] the season where we have the state of
[1:34:56] the city, the state of the county, the
[1:34:58] state of the school district, state of
[1:35:00] the union, the state of and our team uh
[1:35:04] on our city council. I'm so impressed
[1:35:07] with everything that you all do and how
[1:35:10] you are so involved in so many different
[1:35:13] ways, not just with the city of Boulder
[1:35:16] City, but everywhere you go. Uh we truly
[1:35:19] have a wonderful team here and
[1:35:22] recognizing that the state of our city,
[1:35:25] the state of Boulder City address is
[1:35:28] more than an address and it will be
[1:35:30] happening on Thursday, this Thursday the
[1:35:33] 15th, uh 3:00 start mingling and 4:00 uh
[1:35:38] have the actual state of the city
[1:35:40] happen. Uh, in as much as we have a
[1:35:43] theme of the of a team, which is what we
[1:35:46] are, uh, I thought, so how do you
[1:35:49] identify yourself as a team, uh,
[1:35:52] Councilwoman Booth refuses to wear a
[1:35:55] t-shirt, so we'll have to do it with
[1:35:57] hats, but she refuses that, too. So,
[1:36:00] she's part of the team no matter what.
[1:36:04] Beautiful things that she wears. Uh, but
[1:36:07] I would be curious of how many people
[1:36:09] are going to come to the state of the
[1:36:11] city with their favorite team hat. Um,
[1:36:15] >> sports
[1:36:16] » sports
[1:36:16] >> and and we could have a good time with
[1:36:18] » and and we could have a good time with
[1:36:18] this.
[1:36:19] >> So, the state of the city will be at
[1:36:21] » So, the state of the city will be at
[1:36:21] 3:00 4:00 actually starting the address
[1:36:25] and all of these people on city council
[1:36:28] are actually now TV stars. Uh, I've
[1:36:32] viewed their presentations and they're
[1:36:34] wonderful and uh, I think people are
[1:36:37] going to enjoy the state of the city.
[1:36:39] Uh, you get a little feel for how we do
[1:36:42] it here, but this will actually be fun
[1:36:46] and we'll enjoy having everybody here.
[1:36:49] So, I have nothing else to report. If no
[1:36:51] one else has anything, the meeting's
[1:36:54] adjourned. Thank you very much.
[1:36:57] >> The second person that we nominated for
[1:37:00] » The second person that we nominated for
[1:37:00] the
[1:37:03] Tammy, I sent you mine.