1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:09,920 was a nice dinner like that. >> Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. It 2 00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:14,559 is now 5:30 and I will call this regular work session of the Burnsville City 3 00:00:11,759 --> 00:00:18,800 Council to order. Um, >> it's good to see members of our 4 00:00:16,720 --> 00:00:23,199 community present in the council chambers. Welcome everyone. 5 00:00:21,199 --> 00:00:31,359 Members of our community and the public are welcome to attend uh also by 6 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:37,280 watching us on Burnsville mn.gov/meings or Comcast channel 16 or 859. 7 00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:45,360 The public can also participate through Zoom by joining us at zoom. us/join. 8 00:00:42,320 --> 00:00:50,239 More information is available on our meetings web page and in the council 9 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:55,680 agenda packet. This is a work session and we go directly to the items that are 10 00:00:52,800 --> 00:01:06,359 on the agenda. So the first item on the agenda is finding um study that uh was 11 00:01:00,399 --> 00:01:06,359 done and Garrett Beck, you're on deck. 12 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:13,119 » Thank you, Madam Mayor. I like the way that rhymes. Uh good evening, mayor and 13 00:01:10,159 --> 00:01:17,360 council. Uh this evening we are going to talk about a wayfinding study that our 14 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:24,960 team has been up to over the last year or so. Um, you may recall back in June 15 00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:30,799 of 2024, uh, the team presented a parks plan, um, which really inventoried and 16 00:01:28,400 --> 00:01:35,280 assessed all of our, um, our park amenities within the system. And as part 17 00:01:33,119 --> 00:01:39,920 of that process of the presentation, uh, we indicated that evening that we were 18 00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:44,079 going to also be completing over a period of time a park wayfinding study 19 00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:50,560 as well, which would be part of the park's plan in the future. 20 00:01:47,119 --> 00:01:55,119 So just a quick overview. Um a wayfinding study essentially establishes 21 00:01:53,200 --> 00:02:00,000 a comprehensive citywide framework for how visitors can navigate our park 22 00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:07,040 system. Uh this particular study assessed all 76 of our parks. Uh we used 23 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:12,311 a variety of uh ways to engage our community uh through different events 24 00:02:08,959 --> 00:02:16,720 and platforms. And uh the final product [clears throat] will be aligned with 25 00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:21,120 Burns sign standards. So the goal of the project uh was 26 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:26,080 strictly related to the community benefits as well. So having a a 27 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:31,120 comprehensive wayfinding plan will improve orientation and navigation for 28 00:02:28,239 --> 00:02:35,040 our guests. It promotes accessibility. It increases the awareness of the 29 00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:39,360 amenities within the park system. Uh it helps us to effectively communicate to 30 00:02:37,519 --> 00:02:45,440 the public. Uh and it supports multimodal access. 31 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:53,920 So, the baseline assessment done by a consultant uh looked at 473 signs in our 32 00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:57,840 76 parks and they determined uh based on their standards that 23 of our parks 33 00:02:55,920 --> 00:03:05,200 currently meet uh appropriate wayfinding. Uh they indicated that 149 34 00:03:02,239 --> 00:03:10,080 new signs um should be considered and I'll talk about uh those signs later on 35 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:17,120 in the presentation here. They also propo proposed that we remove 44 signs 36 00:03:13,519 --> 00:03:21,840 um with uh 89 signs currently being in condition one and two. And I'll just 37 00:03:19,519 --> 00:03:26,560 share right now uh part of our uh process over the last few years and into 38 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:29,680 the to the near future is that we're working to [snorts] 39 00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:34,319 um replace condition one and two amenities. Uh the reason why there's 40 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:38,400 still 89 out there for signs is that we wanted to complete the wayfinding study 41 00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:41,440 first. We didn't want to be replacing uh signs that are condition one and two 42 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:46,319 only to determine that they might be one of the 44. So, uh now that this study is 43 00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:51,120 complete, we'll work on um taking care of those signs as well. 44 00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:56,239 I talked about community engagement. Um we did eight on-site park intercepts. 45 00:03:53,599 --> 00:04:01,599 So, that's really just um the team going out to a park, setting up a table and a 46 00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:06,239 tent, uh sharing uh what's going on for the project, giving people opportunities 47 00:04:03,599 --> 00:04:11,760 to communicate in person [cough] about um their ideas and and concerns, and 48 00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:18,320 also an opportunity to visit a website and provide more information in a future 49 00:04:13,519 --> 00:04:22,880 time if they wanted. Um, we had online uh mapping opportunities, so someone 50 00:04:20,479 --> 00:04:28,160 could go on to their park and put a a pinpoint on there and then put a note 51 00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:35,720 about um thoughts about wayfinding in a particular area. And then they also uh 52 00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:35,720 were present at six of our city events. 53 00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:45,040 So [clears throat] from a community engagement uh feedback process uh we 54 00:04:41,440 --> 00:04:48,720 heard that um there was an opportunity to uh or I shared that there was an 55 00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:53,040 online opportunity to request signs in the park system. So people were doing 56 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:58,560 that. Um they felt overall there was a need for clearer more consistent signage 57 00:04:55,520 --> 00:05:04,080 and maps in the park. um an opportunity to expand signage for trails and access 58 00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:09,320 points and then uh directional signage to specific amenities once you in the 59 00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:09,320 park. 60 00:05:09,919 --> 00:05:17,360 So, a little bit about the signage family and uh the different types of 61 00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:23,520 signs you may see in a park system. So, amenity signs basically distinguish um 62 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:28,160 specific features in a park. So, um, if it's a playground, there's usually a 63 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:34,960 name of a playground and whatnot. Um, the arrival signs are your park 64 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:39,600 entrances. Um, it may be an amenity. For example, in Civic Center Park, we have a 65 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:43,680 skate park, right? So, um, there is a an arrival sign for coming to Civic Center 66 00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:48,160 Park, but then when you get to Lion Skate Park, then there's a different 67 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:54,080 amenity sign there. Uh it also includes rules and safety and guidelines for uh 68 00:05:51,919 --> 00:05:59,039 the park system. A destination sign highlights a key 69 00:05:56,560 --> 00:06:05,280 destination within the park. Uh so for example um there if you're out at Lac 70 00:06:02,400 --> 00:06:13,039 Leavon uh there are six ball fields out there and so a destination sign may be 71 00:06:09,199 --> 00:06:18,319 uh you're at field A or field B or field E or whatnot. Directional signs provide 72 00:06:15,840 --> 00:06:24,240 clear guidance at decision points. So if you're at a uh a road fork or a trail 73 00:06:21,919 --> 00:06:28,319 fork, it helps you to to determine what direction you want to go based on what 74 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:32,880 your goal is. And then there are also actual trail and path signs that help 75 00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:38,039 you to know uh where you're at on the on the trail and the path and within the 76 00:06:35,039 --> 00:06:38,039 park. 77 00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:45,280 So [snorts] insights from this um directional signs that guide visitors 78 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:50,880 are severely under represented at only 4.2% of all of our signs. And so what 79 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:56,319 that means at the end of the day is that um people uh should in [clears throat] 80 00:06:54,000 --> 00:07:00,800 general have uh are able to find our parks, but once they get inside of our 81 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:05,680 larger parks, uh they may have some difficulty navigating through the park 82 00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:12,000 system at that point. So, I talked about um the recommendation 83 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:16,479 for signs that um need to be added to the park system based on uh the proposal 84 00:07:14,400 --> 00:07:21,199 and the and the plan. And this is just an example of what um obviously this is 85 00:07:19,440 --> 00:07:25,599 not what one of our signs look like at this time, but it gives you an idea that 86 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:29,759 uh if you were at this particular park, uh there's a inside the parking lot, 87 00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:34,160 there's an arrow there that says you are here. Um, and then a person can then see 88 00:07:32,639 --> 00:07:38,880 based on where they're at when they're looking at the sign, if they want to get 89 00:07:35,599 --> 00:07:44,720 over to the fitness, uh, area, uh, what direction they would need to go to, uh, 90 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:49,840 and whatnot. So, if you think about our park system specifically, we have some 91 00:07:46,800 --> 00:07:54,720 very large community parks. Um, if you think about Neil Park, for example, uh, 92 00:07:52,080 --> 00:08:00,960 there are actually five different major parking lots that you could, uh, go to 93 00:07:57,199 --> 00:08:06,080 park to, uh, within Neil Park. So, uh, an example of where a sign like this 94 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:11,039 would be appropriate is that, uh, at each of those five locations where 95 00:08:08,560 --> 00:08:14,800 people are coming and parking and getting out and getting ready to use the 96 00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:19,440 park. There may also be other situations where there's major forks uh, within a 97 00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:25,440 larger park uh, where a sign like this may be appropriate as well. 98 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:31,280 So again, the recommendation uh from the study is to replace or remove 44 of the 99 00:08:28,319 --> 00:08:37,039 signs that provide minimal effectiveness to install 149 uh new signs of which a 100 00:08:34,959 --> 00:08:40,560 lot of them will look like the the sign that [clears throat] I just mentioned 101 00:08:38,399 --> 00:08:44,000 where it's an overview of the park helps people to figure out what amenities are 102 00:08:42,560 --> 00:08:47,839 in the park, how are they going to travel to get to those. Um 103 00:08:45,971 --> 00:08:53,040 [clears throat] and then thoughtful use of the city's messaging and consistent 104 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,040 standards. 105 00:08:53,920 --> 00:09:02,080 The implementation process for this would be to finalize our sign standards. 106 00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:05,839 Our team will work uh we'll look at the needs of those signs that need to be 107 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:09,920 added, work with our communications department, develop the standards, what 108 00:09:07,680 --> 00:09:15,440 the sign will look like, make sure it's consistent with um our sign process. 109 00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:21,120 We'll then develop a cost estimate and identify a funding plan to pay for those 110 00:09:17,519 --> 00:09:25,920 signs and then prioritize by category. In general, uh we will look at our 111 00:09:23,839 --> 00:09:30,160 larger parks that have more visitors to try to make sure we get those up to 112 00:09:27,519 --> 00:09:36,080 speed uh as quickly as possible and then work our way through uh the neighborhood 113 00:09:32,560 --> 00:09:40,080 and and many parks and um finish it off that way. 114 00:09:38,240 --> 00:09:44,720 So, I will pause and see if there are any 115 00:09:43,839 --> 00:09:48,720 questions or comments. >> Comments for staff, 116 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:52,160 questions, comments. >> I think it's a good idea of the signage 117 00:09:50,399 --> 00:09:55,680 that's uh not only for the current residents, but we we have a lot of new 118 00:09:53,600 --> 00:10:01,200 residents in this city that are just starting to learn our parks. So, that's 119 00:09:57,600 --> 00:10:06,959 going to really help them a lot. >> Agreed. I think this is a a nice thing 120 00:10:04,399 --> 00:10:12,560 to have. Um, >> okay. Any other comments? Yep. 121 00:10:10,560 --> 00:10:18,399 » I I have noticed visiting other cities that they have some pretty good uh park 122 00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:23,120 way finding signs and I have felt a little jealous that we don't um just 123 00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:27,040 never was a big huge priority until we did this project or staff did this 124 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:31,600 project and it kind of shined a spotlight on that. Well, when we did the 125 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:37,839 parks analysis, >> that really told a big story about the 126 00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:42,000 inventory that we have and the analysis that was done that identified what we 127 00:10:40,560 --> 00:10:48,160 needed to invest in. >> Yeah. I think for the most part for the 128 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:51,920 parks that we have, it's a visual thing, right? You see where stuff is at, but 129 00:10:49,839 --> 00:10:57,360 sometimes there's parks, you can't see all of the amenities that are there. But 130 00:10:54,560 --> 00:11:01,040 um I think there's a lot of good reasons to do this, so I support it. 131 00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,079 » Yeah. [clears throat] >> My 132 00:11:01,680 --> 00:11:06,959 » Yeah. >> My only thought is if we and I know 133 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:09,959 we're not to the design phase yet, but um 134 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:15,279 restrict or reduce the amount of branding. I mean, we obviously can do 135 00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:18,959 colors, but if we do logos and stuff, so that way if there is an overhaul, then 136 00:11:17,600 --> 00:11:23,360 we're not having to go back through and replace allund and so of those. 137 00:11:25,680 --> 00:11:33,680 So it it's been mentioned and and I agree we have a very diverse population 138 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:41,360 here in Burnsville. So in going through and this is page 13 of the plan 139 00:11:38,399 --> 00:11:47,600 the symbols need to be ident um defined so people know what those symbols are uh 140 00:11:44,560 --> 00:11:53,040 because it might be interpreted one way for somebody and a different way for 141 00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:56,720 someone else. So what does the symbols mean? 142 00:11:54,560 --> 00:12:02,959 Because people can look at the symbols and some will will understand but some 143 00:12:00,399 --> 00:12:10,320 would not. So that's good. The other thing is that 144 00:12:06,320 --> 00:12:18,200 I [snorts] just love going through the whole 145 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:18,200 plan. 235 pages by the way. 146 00:12:20,240 --> 00:12:25,480 and you had all of the trails marked. 147 00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:38,480 I liked that. However, uh down at uh the river park, the 148 00:12:35,519 --> 00:12:44,320 riverfront park, the trail that's missing is around 149 00:12:40,463 --> 00:12:48,000 [clears throat] Black Dog Lake. If you can take a look at that. 150 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:54,639 » Take a look at that. Yep. >> Yeah. Well, I know that e Excel built 151 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:58,480 that, but it's still within the trail system because when we come around, you 152 00:12:56,399 --> 00:13:05,120 can do that. The other thing that I So, when we're 153 00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:09,839 when we do the trail map, I think it'll be something that we need 154 00:13:06,800 --> 00:13:16,800 to take a look at, but I was interesting. So, Keller, I did not 155 00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:24,360 realize that the trail at Keller Lake goes all the way and winds into Apple 156 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:24,360 Valley and circles back into Burnsville. 157 00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:32,560 So, I was thinking that maybe on my walks I was into Apple Valley did not 158 00:13:30,320 --> 00:13:38,814 know. So, is there going to be signs that say 159 00:13:35,519 --> 00:13:38,814 you are leaving Burnsville? [laughter] 160 00:13:38,959 --> 00:13:47,600 Because the same thing is in Alamagnet. Because when you take that trail in 161 00:13:44,720 --> 00:13:54,320 Alamagnet, when I looked at it, it goes right out into Apple Valley and then 162 00:13:49,920 --> 00:14:01,519 curves all the way back. So, but I don't I I didn't know that I was 163 00:13:57,760 --> 00:14:04,519 leaving Burnsville and was in Apple Valley. 164 00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:14,079 » Thank you. just just some thoughts in when you do the trail. Um because this 165 00:14:11,199 --> 00:14:19,800 is I love the fact that you also identified the trail from uh Fiser 166 00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:26,639 Park going all the way down to Alam uh to Lac Laban 167 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:32,480 that whole trail. I don't think a lot of people realize that that goes all the 168 00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:36,480 way down to Llaban Park. Do you, >> Madam Mayor? I would agree. That's why. 169 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:40,480 Yes. I I think the signs at the different entrances really help those 170 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:44,560 overhead ones really help people to see all the different things. And that's a 171 00:14:41,839 --> 00:14:48,560 great example of a park where you you can may not know that those amenities 172 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:50,560 are even there if depending on why you're visiting the park in the first 173 00:14:49,839 --> 00:14:58,070 place. And >> the only way I found it was during co 174 00:14:54,480 --> 00:14:58,070 » just keep walking. [laughter] 175 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:05,839 Just keep walking. And um 176 00:15:02,320 --> 00:15:10,320 so th those were just I was thinking people should know about this because 177 00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:18,079 it's a really nice trail and it goes down into Laman and winds around and 178 00:15:15,120 --> 00:15:23,440 yeah so yeah then >> well there in addition to enhancing 179 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:28,240 there's maintenance and replacement like the sign at the the dog park bulletin 180 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:34,160 sign is is an absolute embarrassment. and it's in such horrific shape that it 181 00:15:31,839 --> 00:15:38,880 really reflects poorly on the city. So, I think some of those things have to be 182 00:15:36,399 --> 00:15:41,519 addressed sooner than later. I mean, to me, they're they should be addressed on 183 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:47,360 the front end of this project because they they that's that is a I don't 184 00:15:45,600 --> 00:15:51,040 believe how bad that is. >> Well, they're going to get to all of 185 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:56,560 that because that's one and two in in the plan. 186 00:15:51,759 --> 00:16:00,720 » Yeah. And and then page 34, you have all of the different family of signs for the 187 00:16:00,240 --> 00:16:04,639 different >> and we have some really great signs that 188 00:16:02,639 --> 00:16:07,519 are really nice. And then we have that one which is 189 00:16:06,160 --> 00:16:10,959 » that's the other end of the spectrum. >> Yeah, 190 00:16:08,639 --> 00:16:16,320 » the route signs are really nice. I think that'll give the system of what you're 191 00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:21,279 looking [clears throat] to to put in place. And then the examples that you 192 00:16:18,399 --> 00:16:25,040 have on page 35 is really gives people an an understanding of what it it's 193 00:16:23,360 --> 00:16:31,519 going to look like. [clears throat] Yeah. So I I like all these things 194 00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:36,800 because it really helps us to understand when we're going to invest in these 195 00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:41,440 signs and what it's going to cost. Yeah. But I can't wait now for to see 196 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:46,146 the the trail plan 197 00:16:44,126 --> 00:16:46,146 [snorts] 198 00:16:46,240 --> 00:16:50,560 because it's this is really good. >> Good. 199 00:16:50,079 --> 00:16:55,279 » Good to >> But it really really lets people know 200 00:16:52,639 --> 00:16:58,639 where where things are. But I don't know the the folks who live over in 201 00:16:56,880 --> 00:17:02,639 Alamagnet. Did you know that you were leaving Burnsville and you were in Apple 202 00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:06,160 Valley? we're friends with their 203 00:17:03,920 --> 00:17:12,559 » there probably those of us who don't walk that those trails all the time you 204 00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:20,240 know cuz I walk I try to walk all over the city so it's not but I looked at it 205 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:25,439 and I said wow that's a lot so 206 00:17:23,199 --> 00:17:30,120 we have we share quite a bit with Apple Valley Keller Alamagnet 207 00:17:30,960 --> 00:17:39,600 yeah So very good. Anything else? But I think the Terrell system plan, I know 208 00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:46,760 we've been working on it because we also work with 209 00:17:41,360 --> 00:17:46,760 Dakota County on the Marian 210 00:17:47,120 --> 00:17:56,720 talk about the trail sidewalk and all >> it's going on. 211 00:17:55,522 --> 00:17:59,760 [snorts] >> It'll come. Yeah, 212 00:17:57,840 --> 00:18:03,840 » we I like all the plans you're putting in place. 213 00:18:01,679 --> 00:18:09,840 Just curious. Okay. Thank you. Anything else? 214 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:14,880 Those are just my thoughts. >> All right. Thank you, Madam Mayor and 215 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:19,679 council members. Um I am also uh up on this next one, but 216 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:22,000 » Oh, that's right. I'm sorry. >> Yeah. No, that's all right. 217 00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:23,280 » This is his night. >> Yeah. 218 00:18:22,559 --> 00:18:28,640 » Yeah. >> And and so item, too, because you've got 219 00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:34,880 all of it. Okay. Yeah. This is the Rose Park land use and picobal project. And 220 00:18:31,600 --> 00:18:42,640 Garrett, you're up and so is our deputy city manager in community development 221 00:18:38,559 --> 00:18:45,840 director. It's such a long title, >> Jeff Thompson. 222 00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:48,720 » Thank you, Madam Mayor. Um, just so people don't get sick of hearing me 223 00:18:47,039 --> 00:18:52,720 talk, Jeff's going to help me out along the way here. So, um, uh, this evening 224 00:18:51,852 --> 00:18:58,480 [snorts] we're going to take a look at the Rose Park land use and pickle ball 225 00:18:55,280 --> 00:19:04,480 project update. Um so you may recall back on October 14th of 2025 at a city 226 00:19:01,919 --> 00:19:08,240 council work session um council had the opportunity to review a pickle ball 227 00:19:06,000 --> 00:19:15,200 feasibility study uh that informed the possibility of a pickle ball project at 228 00:19:11,280 --> 00:19:19,760 uh Alamagnet Cliffn Hollows and Rose Parks. 229 00:19:17,919 --> 00:19:24,799 So after a review of the schematic designs and hearing about the community 230 00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:30,320 engagement results, council shared a consensus that evening for a preferred 231 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:37,400 location in the order of Rose Park first, followed closely by Clifton Park 232 00:19:33,120 --> 00:19:37,400 and then Alamagnet and Hollows. 233 00:19:37,679 --> 00:19:44,400 So council direction that evening was that staff continue the development of a 234 00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:49,600 pickleball facility at Rose Park by continuing negotiations for a land use 235 00:19:46,720 --> 00:19:55,720 agreement for Rose Park with the owners of that property which is RTX/Collins 236 00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:55,720 Aerospace. 237 00:19:57,200 --> 00:20:02,880 So, um, mayor and council, you'll recall, um, as part of the feasibility 238 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:06,080 study as we were exploring, um, the opportunities for the pickle ball 239 00:20:03,919 --> 00:20:10,640 project across the entire park system, um, one park that was identified, um, as 240 00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:14,720 a potential is Rose Park, um, which we talked about in October. And as part of 241 00:20:12,559 --> 00:20:18,320 the feasibility, we um wanted to explore the park, but recognizing that there's a 242 00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:21,360 unique agreement on that park and that we don't own it, but there's a long-term 243 00:20:19,679 --> 00:20:26,880 lease uh that the city has had for the for the use of that land um for a park. 244 00:20:25,039 --> 00:20:30,400 So, we had engaged Collins um in conversations as part of the feasibility 245 00:20:28,480 --> 00:20:32,799 study uh just to to see if it was something that we could continue to 246 00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:38,080 explore and bring forward for the council for consideration. 247 00:20:35,039 --> 00:20:42,159 um at that October work session. Um this is information that we we talked about 248 00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:46,559 which is um RTX and Collins were were open to a potential uh partnership for 249 00:20:45,039 --> 00:20:52,400 potentially constructing the pickleball courts um on that land. Um and we had 250 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:57,120 had very early and high level conversations with them about what a 251 00:20:54,159 --> 00:21:02,159 land agreement for that uh could look like and they had kind of framed three 252 00:21:00,000 --> 00:21:06,960 larger um options for the city for potential future consideration. Um at 253 00:21:04,480 --> 00:21:10,640 the time that was um the three options they had uh framed for us were extending 254 00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:14,480 the existing ground lease for an additional 20 years uh to allow for the 255 00:21:12,880 --> 00:21:18,000 construction of the of the of the project. The other two options were 256 00:21:16,640 --> 00:21:22,559 extending the lease for a shorter duration and that's like a a three-year 257 00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:27,520 duration um with the with the option for the city to purchase the land after that 258 00:21:24,400 --> 00:21:34,480 three-year lease and then um an option to sell the land uh to the city um uh uh 259 00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:38,880 for the project to proceed. So those were the again we didn't have in October 260 00:21:36,400 --> 00:21:42,000 any specific terms for um for response or or information to to be able to 261 00:21:40,720 --> 00:21:45,919 respond to it but those were the three high level options that had been 262 00:21:43,120 --> 00:21:49,919 provided and there was a a question that they had asked of us which was whether 263 00:21:48,240 --> 00:21:55,600 the the property could be considered taxexempt um for uh property tax 264 00:21:52,960 --> 00:22:00,320 purposes uh because uh it is currently and has been previously 265 00:21:58,159 --> 00:22:04,159 um classified by the county assessor as industrial land vacant industrial land 266 00:22:02,320 --> 00:22:08,720 and taxed at the full market value of of of industrial land. 267 00:22:07,120 --> 00:22:11,280 So those were the that was the information. Again, this isn't new. This 268 00:22:10,080 --> 00:22:16,000 is what we had talked about at that October work session before we get in. 269 00:22:13,760 --> 00:22:19,840 And then as Garrett said, the direction from the council was for us to continue 270 00:22:17,679 --> 00:22:24,559 those ne negotiations with the landowner RTX Collins and bring back specific 271 00:22:21,840 --> 00:22:27,600 terms for the council's consideration. Um we'll talk about that, but before I 272 00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:30,880 just want to uh just do a little reminder of uh the existing arrangement. 273 00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:36,000 So as I said, the land is owned by Collins RTX. Um, it is, um, the original 274 00:22:34,400 --> 00:22:40,159 lease agreement for the park was was developed in or was signed by the city 275 00:22:37,600 --> 00:22:44,559 in the parties in 1992 when the park was developed. It was a dollar lease for a 276 00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:48,240 20-year period and allowed us to build the park amenities that are largely out 277 00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:54,159 there today, the the ball field um, and the the soccer field. Um, and as I said, 278 00:22:51,919 --> 00:22:57,840 that was a 20 year originally a 20-year lease. Um, there have been two 279 00:22:55,520 --> 00:23:02,240 amendments since that original lease. a lease in a first amendment in 2010 and 280 00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:03,679 then a second amendment in April of 2019. 281 00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:08,960 » Yes. >> So the you know the the gerine um points 282 00:23:07,120 --> 00:23:13,919 of the existing ground lease term is the the current lease uh runs through 283 00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:18,080 September of 2032 for the portion of the park that is the property that is used 284 00:23:15,919 --> 00:23:22,320 as a park. There's a portion of the property that is uh that Collins 285 00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:26,960 constructed an employee parking lot on and that area is not included in in the 286 00:23:24,880 --> 00:23:32,720 lease agreement because the original 20-year lease term 287 00:23:28,960 --> 00:23:37,440 has has um has expired. Um there is no long um they are no longer responsible 288 00:23:35,280 --> 00:23:40,880 for compensating the city if if they terminate it. But either party does have 289 00:23:39,440 --> 00:23:45,679 the ability to terminate that existing lease agreement with a 180day or or 290 00:23:43,600 --> 00:23:49,600 six-month notice to to either party. But as I said, because that original buyout 291 00:23:48,080 --> 00:23:53,760 clause from the original lease has is has expired, Akones wouldn't be 292 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:56,880 responsible for for paying us should they terminate that lease um early um 293 00:23:55,840 --> 00:23:59,880 that's allowed under the lease agreement. 294 00:24:00,000 --> 00:24:05,520 So, uh first I just talk a little bit about the property tax exemption 295 00:24:03,039 --> 00:24:08,640 conversations that we've had. um for information, [clears throat] the the 296 00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:12,720 Dakota County Assessor is ultimately the agency that determines and sets um the 297 00:24:11,039 --> 00:24:18,159 property tax classification and the property tax valuation for all 298 00:24:14,480 --> 00:24:22,080 properties in Burnsville. Um and so we facilitated convers since the October 299 00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:27,039 work session, we facilitated conversations with the Dakota County 300 00:24:23,840 --> 00:24:31,120 Assessor. Um and initially the those conversations um the assessor indicated 301 00:24:29,279 --> 00:24:35,360 that based on their review of this the statute and the guidance provided by the 302 00:24:33,039 --> 00:24:40,320 department of revenue the the unique agreement we have uh did not qualify the 303 00:24:37,760 --> 00:24:44,159 property for tax exemption which is why that determination had been made over 304 00:24:41,919 --> 00:24:47,760 the years to tax it as the industrial land value. 305 00:24:45,919 --> 00:24:52,000 We did then uh just reach out to the department of revenue um the state 306 00:24:49,360 --> 00:24:56,640 agency that oversees it and um ultimately they provided some guidance 307 00:24:54,080 --> 00:25:01,679 documents to the city for a um comparable situation in a different 308 00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:06,159 county in Minnesota which said that a an agreement such as a ground lease for a 309 00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:12,799 for potentially exempt use could be classified um as taxexempt. 310 00:25:09,520 --> 00:25:16,400 So, the city provided that um guidance document provided from the department of 311 00:25:14,320 --> 00:25:22,159 revenue as well as the copy of our lease agreement uh for the property to uh the 312 00:25:19,600 --> 00:25:26,400 Dakota County Assessor. Um they reviewed all of that and ultimately um made a 313 00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:31,840 decision that [clears throat] the city's leased portion of the property um will 314 00:25:29,039 --> 00:25:37,200 be exempt from properties taxes starting in uh 2027. So, as you know, the the the 315 00:25:35,360 --> 00:25:41,120 property tax system works that essentially the the values that are the 316 00:25:39,600 --> 00:25:44,799 the classification values that ultimately determine tax year tax uh 317 00:25:43,200 --> 00:25:50,320 your property taxes are determined the year ahead of the payable tax year. And 318 00:25:47,120 --> 00:25:55,600 so, um ultimately it becomes effective uh next year in 2027. 319 00:25:53,039 --> 00:25:59,360 » Jeff, will it spring back when the lease expires then? 320 00:25:57,600 --> 00:26:03,679 » Um mayor and council, yeah, I mean ultimately yes. Um, as you can, as it 321 00:26:02,080 --> 00:26:07,679 says on the slide, right, any future change, what the the determination that 322 00:26:05,520 --> 00:26:11,679 the county assessor made says that if there are any changes to the property 323 00:26:09,279 --> 00:26:15,520 use, the improve the improvements or the lease, they they would re re-review that 324 00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:18,480 and ultimately determine if it still qualifies for exemption. We would assume 325 00:26:17,279 --> 00:26:22,000 if there's not that ground lease in place that qualifies for exemption, um, 326 00:26:20,400 --> 00:26:26,320 that prop that property tax exemption would likely go away. 327 00:26:24,320 --> 00:26:30,080 Um and the only other caveat is that exemption is only pertains to the 328 00:26:28,480 --> 00:26:33,600 portion of the property that we lease for the exempt use for the park. So the 329 00:26:32,159 --> 00:26:38,240 area of the park, the area of the property that's used for employee 330 00:26:35,440 --> 00:26:41,880 parking uh would remain taxable uh for property tax purposes. 331 00:26:42,480 --> 00:26:49,679 Just provide a little bit of information what that means. Um, so in 2026, 332 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:55,200 uh, the total property val the total pro, uh, property taxes on the property 333 00:26:52,240 --> 00:26:58,799 for the full valuation is just over $104,000. 334 00:26:56,720 --> 00:27:04,080 And that's based on the industrial land value, the taxable market value at full 335 00:27:00,720 --> 00:27:09,919 industrial land at uh, uh, over $3.5 million. The 20 26 amount for the city's 336 00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:12,919 portion of those property taxes is $22,488. 337 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:21,520 Since the exemption applies in 2027, um we don't yet know what those 2027 338 00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:24,720 property taxes will be. Uh because um all the taxing agencies are currently 339 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:29,120 working through their budgets and levy process. Um but um as part of the normal 340 00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:33,360 taxation process, the Dakota County Assessor has released the proposed 341 00:27:31,120 --> 00:27:36,720 taxable market value for the property reflecting those changes of the 342 00:27:34,799 --> 00:27:42,159 exemption for the city's uh ground lease area and reduced the the overall taxable 343 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:45,520 market value of the property from to to $558,000. 344 00:27:43,679 --> 00:27:50,320 So there's a year gap in there, but you can see the overall reduction is about 345 00:27:47,520 --> 00:27:54,480 $3 million in in total property tax um taxable market value for for property 346 00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:58,960 tax purposes. And again, that's independent of the city's lease um 347 00:27:56,159 --> 00:28:02,559 negotiations with RTX Collins. This is um a determination the county assessor 348 00:28:00,399 --> 00:28:07,960 has already made and implemented u based on that department of revenue guidance 349 00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:07,960 and the city's existing lease. 350 00:28:09,279 --> 00:28:15,919 So, um the original um options that Collins had uh we had talked to Collins 351 00:28:14,159 --> 00:28:20,240 about ultimately they gave us a specific lease term proposal for one of those 352 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:23,279 options. Um and so I just want to walk through what the the framework of those 353 00:28:21,760 --> 00:28:28,320 terms are. Um that would be a 20-year lease 354 00:28:25,679 --> 00:28:34,559 extension uh to the existing lease um with an annual initial annual rent of 355 00:28:30,559 --> 00:28:40,159 $90,000 per year with a um annual rent escalation for essentially inflationary 356 00:28:36,880 --> 00:28:43,840 purposes of 2 and a.5% annually. So that the 90,000 would be uh at the first year 357 00:28:42,320 --> 00:28:48,640 and then it would uh increase 2 and a half% uh each year for the 20-year 358 00:28:46,320 --> 00:28:52,880 terms. the the lease extension would be 359 00:28:50,159 --> 00:28:58,159 premised on the the land being prop the land that the city is owning being 360 00:28:54,799 --> 00:29:01,919 property tax exempt. Um and should uh that if should the county assessor make 361 00:29:00,080 --> 00:29:06,240 a different determination uh the annual rent would be adjusted under the lease 362 00:29:03,520 --> 00:29:10,000 terms to fully account for um the city's portion of the property tax uh 363 00:29:07,919 --> 00:29:13,919 liability. Now, we don't expect that, right? Because of the guidance we've 364 00:29:11,360 --> 00:29:17,360 received um um and the ground lease qualifying for exemption, we wouldn't 365 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:21,520 expect that. But it were it was terms that um that Collins and RTX provided in 366 00:29:19,760 --> 00:29:25,840 the lease agreement. Uh should that change based on the the the the clause 367 00:29:23,840 --> 00:29:28,480 that the county assessor said which said they could re-review it if there is a 368 00:29:27,919 --> 00:29:31,360 change. >> So toward the end of this lease it'd be 369 00:29:29,919 --> 00:29:33,360 about 140,000 a year. >> Yeah. 370 00:29:33,105 --> 00:29:35,120 [snorts] >> Two and a half% 371 00:29:34,480 --> 00:29:40,360 » 22. >> Correct. Correct. 372 00:29:37,200 --> 00:29:40,360 » Thank you. 373 00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:48,960 The um we also had a lot of conversations um with RTX and Collins 374 00:29:47,360 --> 00:29:52,720 about the termination clause um recognizing that um the city is making a 375 00:29:51,440 --> 00:29:57,039 substantial investment in this property and under a lease term for building an 376 00:29:55,039 --> 00:30:02,159 asset on land we don't own um there is a risk to the city um that if there's a if 377 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:06,880 RTX Collins has the ability to terminate the lease um it would result in the city 378 00:30:04,960 --> 00:30:12,399 having built improvements um that would no longer be available to us. Um the 379 00:30:09,760 --> 00:30:17,600 terms that they have given us is that um very similar terms to the original 1992 380 00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:22,000 lease which is essentially um either party may terminate uh the lease with a 381 00:30:20,159 --> 00:30:25,360 12-month notice within that 20-year term. Uh either party could terminate 382 00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:30,080 the lease with a 12-month written notice. Um if RTX terminates it, there 383 00:30:28,240 --> 00:30:34,399 would be a simple depreciation clause which essentially says uh we were using 384 00:30:32,559 --> 00:30:38,399 for planning purposes a million dollars of planned capital investment the city 385 00:30:36,240 --> 00:30:42,080 would make that that amount of of total project investment would be depreciated 386 00:30:40,159 --> 00:30:47,360 over the 20-year term of the lease such that the the termination payment would 387 00:30:43,840 --> 00:30:51,520 would decline by uh $50,000 per year. So, in, you know, in year one, we'd get 388 00:30:49,760 --> 00:30:57,120 900. At the end of year one, we'd get $950,000, and by year 19, uh, we would 389 00:30:54,880 --> 00:30:59,760 only receive $50,000 in payment. And then at the end of the lease, there 390 00:30:58,159 --> 00:31:03,679 would be no compensation for the city's capital investment. 391 00:31:02,799 --> 00:31:06,159 » Question. >> Yes. 392 00:31:04,320 --> 00:31:09,640 » What's our normal depreciation of an asset like that? 393 00:31:10,720 --> 00:31:16,399 we have to basically go in and completely overhaul it because right I 394 00:31:14,080 --> 00:31:20,960 mean is 20 years the time where we would have to go in and spend a lot of money 395 00:31:18,480 --> 00:31:25,840 to rehab the whole facility to make it you know maintain it well 396 00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:30,000 » council member Keely yes um with tennis courts pickleball courts there is uh 397 00:31:28,080 --> 00:31:36,640 ongoing maintenance about every 5 years that you want to do for uh crack sealing 398 00:31:32,799 --> 00:31:41,440 and resurfacing but um the general life expectancy of a cord is right around 399 00:31:38,720 --> 00:31:44,880 that 20 year period. Fencing can last a little bit longer. Um, so can lighting 400 00:31:43,919 --> 00:31:46,880 systems, but >> sure, 401 00:31:45,200 --> 00:31:49,679 » if you're looking at the the actual court process itself, that's that's the 402 00:31:48,880 --> 00:31:54,000 general time period. >> This is a logical depreciation [snorts] 403 00:31:51,840 --> 00:31:59,519 schedule at 50,000 a year over the 20 years. So, if they were to cancel after 404 00:31:56,559 --> 00:32:05,039 10 years, we would get half a million, right? But they would also have um the 405 00:32:02,640 --> 00:32:08,640 costs that we would normally bear if we kept it. They would have the costs of 406 00:32:06,799 --> 00:32:13,519 maintaining it, eventually replacing it. So, it's just how assets work with end 407 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:17,600 of depreciation. >> Okay. Cara, 408 00:32:15,679 --> 00:32:21,279 » would they maintain the pickle ball court? I mean, I would assume if they 409 00:32:19,360 --> 00:32:25,440 take the lease back, it would be to take the pickle ball court out 410 00:32:23,360 --> 00:32:31,519 » to do something that they wish to do like a building or a parking lot or or 411 00:32:28,159 --> 00:32:37,120 something like that. Um, >> so there is depreciation of the built 412 00:32:34,080 --> 00:32:44,960 asset. Um, but what we don't get back is the money that we put into it to 413 00:32:42,080 --> 00:32:49,919 get everything prepared and the water management and all that kind of stuff. 414 00:32:47,200 --> 00:32:54,640 Um, which you put that money into it and then after 20 years if you need to redo 415 00:32:52,640 --> 00:32:59,600 the court, you're redoing the court, but you're not having to redo the site prep 416 00:32:57,519 --> 00:33:03,840 and the um like water management, that type of 417 00:33:02,480 --> 00:33:09,279 thing. So, do 418 00:33:06,240 --> 00:33:12,960 we have a breakdown of what that is? Like how much are we putting into it 419 00:33:10,720 --> 00:33:21,039 that would not be the actual pickle ball court? [snorts] 420 00:33:17,039 --> 00:33:26,240 Uh there there just one comment. So, we asked when we were talking to to Collins 421 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:30,320 Aerospace RTX about this, it was a depreciation of all of the investment 422 00:33:28,080 --> 00:33:33,679 that went into it, not just the specific amount that went into the pickle ball 423 00:33:31,679 --> 00:33:38,399 court. So there's some >> parking lot spaces, there's lights, 424 00:33:35,679 --> 00:33:43,039 there's the court, there's the um the wetland management type things. It it 425 00:33:40,799 --> 00:33:48,559 was the total package. So it'd be depreciation of if as council member 426 00:33:45,760 --> 00:33:52,159 Keley mentioned if we let's say it for round numbers it was a million dollar if 427 00:33:50,640 --> 00:33:56,399 after 10 years they would give us $500,000 back because that was the cost 428 00:33:54,480 --> 00:34:01,840 of the total project. >> Okay, I get that. But okay, so say say 429 00:34:00,000 --> 00:34:05,279 we have to do redo redo the pickle ball court 20 years and they're like yes we 430 00:34:03,760 --> 00:34:11,040 would like to give you a lease again, right? Um do we have to pay for site 431 00:34:09,040 --> 00:34:14,480 prep all over again and water management and those costs again? 432 00:34:13,119 --> 00:34:18,240 » We would not at that point. >> Okay. So it would just be rebuilding the 433 00:34:16,320 --> 00:34:25,679 pickle ball court. So the difference I'm asking is how much of what we have to do 434 00:34:22,159 --> 00:34:30,639 is prepping the site and how much is pickle ball court because even with the 435 00:34:28,639 --> 00:34:36,560 depreciation say they boot us off in 10 years and we get the depreciation on the 436 00:34:32,800 --> 00:34:44,320 on the total amount right that still is like we have to 100% site prep somewhere 437 00:34:40,240 --> 00:34:50,639 else. So that's a cost that we incur that we would not have to incur again if 438 00:34:47,280 --> 00:34:54,480 we were able to rebuild on a spot. >> Does that am I asking the right 439 00:34:53,839 --> 00:34:56,879 question? >> Well, [snorts] 440 00:34:55,520 --> 00:35:02,400 » in the right way, I should say. >> Yes. Mayor and council again at a at a 441 00:35:00,320 --> 00:35:10,560 planning level budget perspective. Yes. I I would agree that the um if we look 442 00:35:06,240 --> 00:35:15,280 out 20 years, the cost of um rehabbing the courts in place in their current 443 00:35:12,640 --> 00:35:20,400 location would be less than >> constructing courts, you know, removing 444 00:35:17,520 --> 00:35:23,680 the courts and or then building an entirely new pickle ball project on a 445 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:28,079 different park location and going through all of the 446 00:35:25,200 --> 00:35:30,960 » planning and design and uh total site construction costs. we would assume 447 00:35:29,440 --> 00:35:32,960 those would still be higher than than being able to replace the asset in 448 00:35:32,480 --> 00:35:34,400 place. >> Yeah, 449 00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:37,839 » we don't we don't have a breakdown of what those dollars are because there's 450 00:35:35,760 --> 00:35:41,839 also 20 years of construction inflation that we can't fully um hedge for. But 451 00:35:40,079 --> 00:35:45,760 yes, we would from a planning level perspective assume the a new project 452 00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:50,400 cost would be higher in 20 years than a project that's replacing the courts in 453 00:35:47,040 --> 00:35:57,800 place. How much is it like because we can't say 20 years from now, but like 454 00:35:52,720 --> 00:35:57,800 looking at today, is there a percentage? 455 00:35:57,920 --> 00:36:05,520 I would have to go back and look at the October 456 00:36:02,160 --> 00:36:10,400 um presentation. I I believe we had I I know we had an opinion of probable costs 457 00:36:07,440 --> 00:36:15,520 and it was broken down by line item. >> Uh there were I want to say 25 to 30 458 00:36:13,680 --> 00:36:21,200 line items in there that made up the million dollars. So, I unfortunately, 459 00:36:18,880 --> 00:36:24,880 um, Council Member Scholes, I don't have I I can't tell you. 460 00:36:22,880 --> 00:36:29,440 » My estimate right now on the spot, if I had to say it's going, that would be 461 00:36:26,160 --> 00:36:33,839 about $750,000 of the project would be courts and lights and fencing and things 462 00:36:31,440 --> 00:36:38,400 like that. But the courts themselves, >> but we still $90,000 a year. 463 00:36:36,720 --> 00:36:42,240 » You're going to have $2 million in lease payments by the time this is done. 464 00:36:40,320 --> 00:36:44,560 » $90,000 a year for >> You pay a dollar right now for the same 465 00:36:43,920 --> 00:36:49,839 amount of time. >> Yeah. And I'm trying to remember off the 466 00:36:46,640 --> 00:36:54,800 top of my head when we renovated courts at 467 00:36:52,240 --> 00:37:01,839 um North River Hills, for example, that was in the neighborhood of $300,000 for 468 00:36:58,640 --> 00:37:04,720 an onsite location. If that's helpful. >> That is. Thank you. 469 00:37:02,640 --> 00:37:08,240 » Just the courts, right? So, and the fencing, but 470 00:37:06,160 --> 00:37:11,200 » we already had the lights in place, so >> Right. Right. Yeah. Okay. Yep. 471 00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:12,960 » I appreciate that. Thank you. >> Okay. 472 00:37:12,160 --> 00:37:17,680 » Okay. >> Yeah. I just want to pick up on what uh 473 00:37:16,000 --> 00:37:22,560 Council Member Gerson said. I mean, we're talking about the cost of the 474 00:37:20,320 --> 00:37:25,920 investment and what it looks like if either party gets out, which we probably 475 00:37:24,560 --> 00:37:30,079 wouldn't, but they might, right? You never know. Um company could get sold 476 00:37:28,320 --> 00:37:37,440 again and a new direction and they want to use the property. Um but 477 00:37:34,720 --> 00:37:40,800 maybe the bigger concern is $90,000 a year. 478 00:37:38,079 --> 00:37:43,920 » $9,000 cost. Right now, we'd pay >> escalates. Yeah. And it escalates. I 479 00:37:42,880 --> 00:37:46,079 mean it's >> that's a very 480 00:37:45,280 --> 00:37:48,720 » that's for me >> that's a very bad deal for the city 481 00:37:47,599 --> 00:37:52,640 » for me that's the >> right 482 00:37:50,079 --> 00:37:57,280 » that's the cost >> y 483 00:37:53,119 --> 00:38:02,160 » right now it was $1 >> 90,000 is 484 00:37:59,599 --> 00:38:06,800 and we have a plan moving forward so would you continue please with 485 00:38:04,880 --> 00:38:10,960 » and just mayor and council to quantify that cost you're looking at over $2 486 00:38:09,200 --> 00:38:15,040 million >> over the 20 years 487 00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:15,839 for that cost of just simply using the land, 488 00:38:15,520 --> 00:38:19,119 » right? >> Um, council member Schultz, to your 489 00:38:17,440 --> 00:38:24,400 question, I'm trying to pull up just comparable what we have in terms of 490 00:38:21,200 --> 00:38:28,800 replacement value for um, uh, ro the rose park complex in our parks plan. I'm 491 00:38:26,880 --> 00:38:31,440 still trying to find it. If I if I do, I'll let you know what that number is. 492 00:38:30,240 --> 00:38:38,320 » Appreciate it. Thank you. >> Yeah, but please proceed. 493 00:38:36,079 --> 00:38:43,760 So, council members, in addition to uh getting new information from RTX and 494 00:38:40,640 --> 00:38:50,160 Collins about a potential land uh lease, uh we also learned on April 3rd from BV 495 00:38:47,920 --> 00:38:54,720 United, uh which is the soccer club that provides recreational and travel 496 00:38:52,240 --> 00:38:59,920 opportunities uh for soccer for Burns residents and others. But uh a lot of 497 00:38:57,920 --> 00:39:04,720 Burns residents uh who choose to participate uh announced that they had 498 00:39:02,079 --> 00:39:11,280 an intent to dissolve as an organization effective at the end of this month. Um 499 00:39:08,400 --> 00:39:17,040 in August 2026 um and I did have a conversation with uh 500 00:39:14,560 --> 00:39:22,720 the president of the Burns Athletic Club just to affirm this. Um the Burns 501 00:39:20,560 --> 00:39:26,240 Athletic Club intends to take over the recreational 502 00:39:24,240 --> 00:39:33,520 um side of providing soccer opportunities for Bernzo residents. So 503 00:39:31,040 --> 00:39:38,560 um during that conversation, we also just talked about um if they had a plan 504 00:39:36,400 --> 00:39:42,800 on potential sites that they would be interested in and um Carrie indicated 505 00:39:41,680 --> 00:39:46,640 during that conversation [snorts] that uh she did not foresee Cliff N 506 00:39:45,200 --> 00:39:54,800 being one of the sites that they would like to use. um which was um at a 507 00:39:50,880 --> 00:40:00,960 location that uh the that BV United had been using pretty heavily um throughout 508 00:39:57,839 --> 00:40:05,839 their existence. So uh nonetheless uh what this means is that um just because 509 00:40:03,760 --> 00:40:11,440 of soccer decline in Burnernzo and the fact that that organization cannot um 510 00:40:08,800 --> 00:40:17,119 does not wish to continue uh we will have a change in uh the field use uh 511 00:40:14,320 --> 00:40:23,119 requests that we receive um which will free up some additional fields um for at 512 00:40:21,440 --> 00:40:28,400 a location as we'll talk about like Cliff End that had been heavily 513 00:40:24,720 --> 00:40:32,480 programmed for soccer in the past. So, um, 514 00:40:30,960 --> 00:40:37,440 for this next section of the presentation, we have the four 515 00:40:34,480 --> 00:40:42,480 locations, uh, based on the order that council had, uh, indicated back on 516 00:40:39,680 --> 00:40:47,839 October 15th of 2025. And what you're seeing uh, the rest of 517 00:40:45,040 --> 00:40:52,800 this way is really uh, design, schematic design, uh, statistics, things like that 518 00:40:50,160 --> 00:40:58,560 that were reflective uh, and true at the time of the October 15th. uh set another 519 00:40:55,760 --> 00:41:02,800 way. Things have not been updated for uh just for this presentation or anything 520 00:41:00,160 --> 00:41:08,480 like that. So, this site we're looking at here is Rose Park. Um some of the 521 00:41:06,720 --> 00:41:13,119 things we talked about that evening were that there'd be a proposal to add an 522 00:41:10,400 --> 00:41:19,200 additional 14 stalls at this location. It would have minimal impact on existing 523 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:23,440 user groups. Um i.e., Rose Park is heavily used by the travel soccer 524 00:41:21,280 --> 00:41:27,599 program. uh but this was an area that was less used and they were more 525 00:41:25,359 --> 00:41:32,640 interested in a facility like this going in at Rose Park where they could absorb 526 00:41:30,480 --> 00:41:38,560 the impacts of it as opposed to cliff end uh as is what they shared uh prior 527 00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:42,720 to the October meeting. Um and from an engagement standpoint there was a strong 528 00:41:40,720 --> 00:41:48,800 community support for this particular location. 529 00:41:45,359 --> 00:41:54,560 These next two sites are cliff. Um this particular one that you're looking at is 530 00:41:50,880 --> 00:41:59,119 the location where uh the ath the soccer club uh had their soccer fields laid out 531 00:41:57,359 --> 00:42:04,800 and we're using uh for their programming. Um it was uh again the 532 00:42:02,800 --> 00:42:09,040 designs are all similar but in this particular case the parking lot's large 533 00:42:07,040 --> 00:42:15,599 enough to to use and we were not proposing additional stalls. However, we 534 00:42:11,280 --> 00:42:19,680 did note on really heavy events um there were situations where these parking lots 535 00:42:17,520 --> 00:42:24,640 were full and people were having to cross Cliff Road and that was kind of a 536 00:42:21,680 --> 00:42:29,440 concern. So, um from an engagement standpoint, um there was low community 537 00:42:27,599 --> 00:42:33,359 support for this particular location, specifically by the soccer club, 538 00:42:31,040 --> 00:42:38,079 indicating that it would have a negative impact on their program. Council member 539 00:42:37,040 --> 00:42:42,560 Gustiffson, I >> I appreciate you going through all these 540 00:42:39,760 --> 00:42:45,520 slides on this. Um, >> in my mind, and I don't know where the 541 00:42:43,839 --> 00:42:49,119 rest of the council is at, I think Rose Park doesn't seem to be a good business 542 00:42:47,520 --> 00:42:52,720 decision on our part. >> And now that we're finding out that the 543 00:42:50,960 --> 00:42:56,160 soccer is not going to get displaced down at Cliff Finn, I think that almost 544 00:42:54,560 --> 00:43:00,240 seems like the natural spot for it to move to gravitate to. And I think we 545 00:42:57,920 --> 00:43:03,920 could kind of cut to that chase a little bit quicker if we 546 00:43:01,200 --> 00:43:11,599 » And you've already assign talked to the club and there's North River Hills which 547 00:43:06,240 --> 00:43:16,480 is a big soccer park. So let's move it along. 548 00:43:12,880 --> 00:43:23,040 » Uh let's delay that. Um because while I 549 00:43:20,640 --> 00:43:28,640 » I appreciate that we're like sitting here and we've we've seen these and been 550 00:43:25,280 --> 00:43:35,119 able to look at them. uh our residents really haven't and that's what this is 551 00:43:32,720 --> 00:43:42,079 for is so that our residents can hear this. So I I get that we're like 552 00:43:39,280 --> 00:43:48,000 » come on move it along but >> this is for residents and I I 553 00:43:45,119 --> 00:43:53,040 » if you can go back and and because the history's been there and you've already 554 00:43:50,480 --> 00:43:58,680 had engagement with a lot of the interested parties on all of this. So, 555 00:43:58,960 --> 00:44:05,359 » do we not want our residents to hear the presentation? 556 00:44:02,960 --> 00:44:10,560 » Uh, well, they saw this presentation last year. But if you want to go through 557 00:44:09,839 --> 00:44:15,920 » I'll go faster. >> Yeah. And then of course all of the the 558 00:44:13,359 --> 00:44:22,560 history of once you understood where things were with the United Soccer Club, 559 00:44:20,240 --> 00:44:27,440 who have you talked with and what was their feedback to you? 560 00:44:26,000 --> 00:44:31,280 because you've talked to a lot of interested parties from what I 561 00:44:29,520 --> 00:44:35,839 understand. >> I'll try to I'll speed up the process 562 00:44:33,280 --> 00:44:38,800 here. Um this was the location with that would have displaced the volleyball 563 00:44:37,119 --> 00:44:43,280 courts. The rest of the information that I shared about the soccer location 564 00:44:40,720 --> 00:44:47,520 remains the same. Uh here's a look at Alamagnet Park with a proposal of 18 565 00:44:45,599 --> 00:44:52,720 spots. There was no displacement of users, but it had low community support. 566 00:44:50,560 --> 00:44:58,800 And here's was Hollows Park which would have displaced a uh a ball field by the 567 00:44:55,440 --> 00:45:04,560 BAC had new parking constructed and new on street parking required. It had 568 00:45:01,040 --> 00:45:09,280 moderate community support. So with that said again I mentioned on October 15th 569 00:45:07,280 --> 00:45:15,760 uh that these numbers were opinions of probable cost related to construction at 570 00:45:11,599 --> 00:45:21,839 each of the locations. Um Alamagnet uh Rose Park was the cheapest. Um, cliffn 571 00:45:19,520 --> 00:45:26,000 uh was also the cheapest on the soccer fields. Uh, the volleyball courts were 572 00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:30,319 more because of the need to add additional wetland um because we had to 573 00:45:28,319 --> 00:45:34,240 fill in some wetland followed by Alamagnet and then Hollowos Park was 574 00:45:32,640 --> 00:45:40,880 going to be the most expensive because of the parking lot needs. 575 00:45:37,839 --> 00:45:45,760 So, uh, from a timeline standpoint, uh, based on decisions from council tonight, 576 00:45:43,839 --> 00:45:49,599 if, uh, we determine there is a location that you would like staff to proceed 577 00:45:47,359 --> 00:45:55,280 with on the project, uh, we would look to engage, uh, the park neighbors at 578 00:45:52,240 --> 00:45:59,040 whatever the location was. Um, and we still have our consultant that we've 579 00:45:56,800 --> 00:46:02,640 been using that we could, uh, be working on survey and site design prep during 580 00:46:01,359 --> 00:46:07,760 that time while we were doing engagement. Um, and then, uh, after that 581 00:46:05,920 --> 00:46:12,400 was complete, we would be looking to do the actual site design, develop the bids 582 00:46:10,160 --> 00:46:18,319 and specs where we could actually bid the project in January through February 583 00:46:15,119 --> 00:46:23,920 of next year with a goal to build it uh, and through the spring and summer based 584 00:46:20,480 --> 00:46:29,599 on the uh, preferred contractor chosen schedule and the Minnesota weather. 585 00:46:27,520 --> 00:46:33,760 So, that takes me to the last slide uh, for policy consideration. Does the city 586 00:46:31,839 --> 00:46:37,920 council wish to continue with a pickle ball project and if so at which 587 00:46:35,920 --> 00:46:42,880 location? >> So I have a question. 588 00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:48,560 » So um is there a map of where the pickle ball 589 00:46:45,839 --> 00:46:55,599 courts are not just in Burnsville but in our surrounding city? So we can 590 00:46:53,040 --> 00:47:03,599 so we can see like is is there a spot that is more 591 00:46:58,640 --> 00:47:06,720 pickle ball rich and a spot more pickle ball poor? 592 00:47:05,520 --> 00:47:10,160 » Pickle ball desert. >> Yes. Is there a pickle ball desert is 593 00:47:09,040 --> 00:47:16,119 what I'm asking. >> Do we have a wide angle view? I think 594 00:47:11,680 --> 00:47:16,119 that's a good question to 595 00:47:16,400 --> 00:47:23,200 » uh Garrett. Um, [clears throat and cough] madame mayor, 596 00:47:20,160 --> 00:47:28,000 uh, members of council, uh, in Burnernzo, we just have the one pickle 597 00:47:25,520 --> 00:47:32,400 ball complex that's an official pickle ball complex. There are six courts that 598 00:47:30,319 --> 00:47:37,760 are dedicated solely to pickle ball. There is one tennis court that is lined 599 00:47:35,119 --> 00:47:46,079 and temporary nets can be put in. >> Um, at Red Oak Park that is on the uh, 600 00:47:42,319 --> 00:47:49,920 north east side of Burnsville. There are no other pickle ball courts in 601 00:47:47,760 --> 00:47:52,319 Burnsville that are dedicated pickleball courts. 602 00:47:51,920 --> 00:47:58,319 » Okay, >> mayor and council, we we do have a a map 603 00:47:54,960 --> 00:48:00,400 of where uh we currently have the Rose Park uh pickle ball 604 00:47:59,760 --> 00:48:07,359 » Red Oak Park. >> Red Oak, I'm sorry. I 605 00:48:03,040 --> 00:48:10,319 » I apologize. uh in Burnsville and uh a map that shows the so if we don't have 606 00:48:08,960 --> 00:48:14,880 it in the presentation I think Bethany can bring it up but a map that then 607 00:48:12,000 --> 00:48:19,680 shows the uh six neighboring communities and where their public dedicated pickle 608 00:48:17,680 --> 00:48:23,920 ball facilities are. >> Thank you because yes 609 00:48:21,520 --> 00:48:30,720 » right here it's on Google Maps. >> There you go. Y 610 00:48:26,400 --> 00:48:34,480 » All right. So where are our three choice? Well, really, we're 611 00:48:32,960 --> 00:48:43,680 not going for the most expensive one, so screw that. Um, where are the other two 612 00:48:39,040 --> 00:48:48,319 choices [clears throat] at on that map? >> One is on the west side, hollow, but 613 00:48:45,920 --> 00:48:51,920 that is real close to a lot of houses. >> I think Hollow is off the table. 614 00:48:49,680 --> 00:48:56,000 » Yeah, Hollow's off the table. So, we're looking at Alam Magnet, which would be 615 00:48:54,640 --> 00:49:01,119 far south. >> Well, there by the 616 00:48:57,920 --> 00:49:02,720 » And we're looking at Cliff Fen. >> Yeah. which 617 00:49:02,160 --> 00:49:08,319 » north >> about in north 618 00:49:05,040 --> 00:49:13,280 » that's in that north area >> and then the Alamagnet one would be way 619 00:49:10,480 --> 00:49:16,240 down southwest but by >> 2011 southeast 620 00:49:14,880 --> 00:49:19,119 » yeah sorry southeast >> north of 42 621 00:49:17,440 --> 00:49:22,079 » north of 40 yeah >> oh 622 00:49:20,640 --> 00:49:25,359 okay >> like the ashaped lake 623 00:49:23,520 --> 00:49:30,960 » yeah exactly east of there >> got it to the border 624 00:49:28,559 --> 00:49:36,359 so they'll both be both on the east side where Clifton Pen is in the central 625 00:49:33,359 --> 00:49:36,359 north. 626 00:49:38,559 --> 00:49:43,839 » And then you got Savage Community Park on the west side. 627 00:49:41,119 --> 00:49:47,440 » And again, to be to be clear, this is just simply public dedicated. 628 00:49:46,880 --> 00:49:52,240 » Yeah. >> Uh pickle ball facilities. So there are 629 00:49:49,839 --> 00:49:55,520 many other multi-striped, multi-use courts, as an example, both in 630 00:49:53,760 --> 00:49:58,319 Burnsville and in our surrounding communities. So, this is just focused on 631 00:49:57,280 --> 00:50:01,680 dedicated. >> And there's some privately owned for 632 00:50:01,119 --> 00:50:04,079 rent. >> Yeah. 633 00:50:02,559 --> 00:50:06,160 » Pickle ball. Like I know there's one in Lakeville that 634 00:50:04,800 --> 00:50:11,800 » Yeah. >> And they're indoors at a shopping center 635 00:50:08,559 --> 00:50:11,800 » year round. 636 00:50:13,040 --> 00:50:20,000 » I wish we had I wish we had those two spots marked on that map. That would be 637 00:50:17,599 --> 00:50:28,079 » helpful. We can update it. One of the decisions that we made back in 2025, 638 00:50:23,119 --> 00:50:33,280 Garrett, was to say if Rose Park didn't do you want to go through that again? I 639 00:50:30,800 --> 00:50:37,760 mean, the decision that was made back in 2025 that if Rose Park wasn't the second 640 00:50:36,640 --> 00:50:42,800 choice was cliff >> 2025 already. 641 00:50:40,480 --> 00:50:44,559 This is 26. I'm looking at the background as well. 642 00:50:44,079 --> 00:50:49,440 » Yeah. >> Yeah. Um, Madame Mayor, if I'm answering 643 00:50:47,200 --> 00:50:55,440 your question correctly, I I believe when council was discussing the project 644 00:50:51,520 --> 00:51:02,480 that evening, um, there was a consensus that uh, Rose Park that council would 645 00:50:59,200 --> 00:51:07,040 like staff to talk to Collins and RTX about the possibility of Rose Park. 646 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:13,200 » Um, there was also some support that evening. um more than one council member 647 00:51:10,319 --> 00:51:19,520 had support for cliffn park as a as kind of a 1a slash two um and then there was 648 00:51:17,040 --> 00:51:26,640 various opinions about hollows and alam magagnet that evening. So um from that 649 00:51:23,280 --> 00:51:30,960 conversation we did have the discussions and uh also with the new information um 650 00:51:29,520 --> 00:51:35,200 have presented that tonight about cliffn. 651 00:51:33,520 --> 00:51:39,920 Okay, members of the council, the question, the policy question before us 652 00:51:37,040 --> 00:51:45,599 is that do we proceed with 653 00:51:42,400 --> 00:51:52,640 what is presented that Rose Park 654 00:51:48,480 --> 00:51:54,640 is I said it's prohibitive. I believe 90,000 from one 655 00:51:54,160 --> 00:52:02,720 » Yeah. >> from one $1 to 90,000 is prohibitive to 656 00:51:58,640 --> 00:52:09,119 go to 90,000 a year. And yet we do have to build it also. So 657 00:52:06,240 --> 00:52:10,240 » shall we say Rose Park is off the table? >> Yes, 658 00:52:09,359 --> 00:52:16,319 » agreed. Yes. >> Okay. Very good. So Cliff Fen is the 659 00:52:13,200 --> 00:52:22,160 next and you have already talked to all of the 660 00:52:18,800 --> 00:52:28,480 soccer players at Cliff Penn and then moving some of that those courts over to 661 00:52:26,160 --> 00:52:31,920 North River Hills. Madame Mayor, yes, I have had 662 00:52:30,480 --> 00:52:36,400 discussions with the president of the BAC. They are planning to do 663 00:52:33,760 --> 00:52:40,240 recreational soccer and uh from our conversation, she indicated that they do 664 00:52:38,319 --> 00:52:44,319 not plan to use Cliff End Park as part of that process. Uh they are still 665 00:52:42,400 --> 00:52:50,000 putting their plan together. It will involve uh some of our neighboring 666 00:52:46,720 --> 00:52:54,079 communities and um but she assured me that at the time of our conversation, 667 00:52:52,160 --> 00:52:57,760 Clifen was not a location they were planning to use. 668 00:52:54,800 --> 00:53:02,079 » Okay. So Cliff F then is the next best here that we have on the 669 00:53:00,000 --> 00:53:08,160 table council. >> So my opposition to Cliff Fen at the 670 00:53:04,319 --> 00:53:12,720 time was the disruption of soccer. Um so with this new information I've softened 671 00:53:10,079 --> 00:53:17,200 up on that location. Um, 672 00:53:14,720 --> 00:53:24,720 I do want to call attention to the fact that this is closer to a wildlife refuge 673 00:53:20,079 --> 00:53:28,240 that has sensitive breeding grounds for eagles and other birds. And I know that 674 00:53:26,480 --> 00:53:35,119 that was a pretty significant talking point in opposition to Al Magnet. And 675 00:53:31,839 --> 00:53:39,920 so, um, I just want us to be consistent here that if this is to go forward with 676 00:53:37,280 --> 00:53:45,920 Cliff Fen, that this could potentially have more disruption here, um, as it 677 00:53:42,640 --> 00:53:53,520 relates to that specific item than it would at Al Magnet. 678 00:53:48,720 --> 00:53:58,400 » Okay. Any other thoughts, Tara? So in the 679 00:53:56,480 --> 00:54:03,880 survey that we did in mid July, 680 00:54:04,079 --> 00:54:08,359 um let's see. 681 00:54:09,200 --> 00:54:21,559 Do you have that on in the presentation or No, I don't think 682 00:54:15,760 --> 00:54:21,559 so. Um so the 683 00:54:21,839 --> 00:54:29,839 All right. So, we're we're down to Ella Magnet and Cliff Fen. And in the would 684 00:54:26,960 --> 00:54:34,800 you like to see a pickle ball complex at your park? 685 00:54:31,680 --> 00:54:43,440 It was fairly comparable. Um 34% said yes to Alamagnet, 686 00:54:38,960 --> 00:54:48,480 28% said Cliff Fen yes. Um which other park would you most like 687 00:54:46,400 --> 00:54:57,040 to see? And they could do multiple choice. Um, Alam Magagnet had 80. Cliff 688 00:54:52,960 --> 00:55:03,119 Ven had 62. Hollows Park had 89. So, Hollow's Park actually 689 00:55:00,240 --> 00:55:08,760 was very high on that one. Rose Park was the highest, but she's gone. Um, 690 00:55:12,160 --> 00:55:21,119 and then are the current parking conditions suitable? 691 00:55:16,800 --> 00:55:31,119 Ala Magnet was 54% said yes. Cliff Fen was 33% yes. Hollows Hollow Park was 29% 692 00:55:26,319 --> 00:55:37,200 yes. So that was not good. Um I'm actually good with either 693 00:55:34,480 --> 00:55:44,559 » What about votes for opposed? Well, I think one of the things that was very 694 00:55:40,400 --> 00:55:50,160 critical was close to residence was a critical item on and when we 695 00:55:47,760 --> 00:55:57,440 looked at at Cliff Finn because it was all industrial all around that was like 696 00:55:55,200 --> 00:56:04,400 Rose Park where you have industry all around so you wouldn't be um affecting 697 00:56:02,000 --> 00:56:09,200 residents. Yeah, that's definitely a benefit of that park for sure. 698 00:56:06,960 --> 00:56:11,760 » Cliffn and Cliff fin had soccer in it in the mix at that time of the survey as 699 00:56:10,960 --> 00:56:17,599 well. So, >> correct. Correct. Um, but it's changed 700 00:56:14,799 --> 00:56:22,480 now and so it appears to me that >> the BCA is saying, "Yeah, we're going to 701 00:56:20,319 --> 00:56:27,200 move everything." And because North River Hills is really a beautiful soccer 702 00:56:24,799 --> 00:56:30,599 complex, >> really beautiful. 703 00:56:30,640 --> 00:56:35,920 So, >> so could you pop up that map again so 704 00:56:33,520 --> 00:56:41,119 that we can put the P like just put a little spot to where that would be 705 00:56:39,280 --> 00:56:45,280 » very close to Red Oak. >> Yeah. Well, you can take a look at 706 00:56:44,319 --> 00:56:48,480 » Cliff >> what you had showed before on the little 707 00:56:47,920 --> 00:56:52,960 crosshairs >> because there's all industry all around. 708 00:56:51,599 --> 00:56:57,040 » Right. But we're we're looking at like where is it in relation to the to the 709 00:56:54,960 --> 00:57:03,280 others. Okay. So, that crosshair would be which is pretty good. um where Cliff 710 00:56:59,839 --> 00:57:12,160 Hen Fen would be and then Alamagnet would be about go so so so so so 711 00:57:08,559 --> 00:57:22,079 right in there. So again, pretty good for not being directly by 712 00:57:18,079 --> 00:57:27,280 another another um public pickle ball court. 713 00:57:24,799 --> 00:57:32,240 So I I think they're both good. I don't I don't think we can go wrong either way 714 00:57:29,920 --> 00:57:35,920 at this point. >> The one thing that I would say with 715 00:57:33,839 --> 00:57:41,440 Cliff and why I really liked it is because it's all industry around and 716 00:57:37,760 --> 00:57:44,440 it's not going to have uh a residential impact. 717 00:57:44,720 --> 00:57:55,359 » Well, I mean, we have [laughter] we already have ball courts 718 00:57:52,079 --> 00:57:59,520 at Alam Magnet. Like there's already ball courts there. So, like I I 719 00:57:57,359 --> 00:58:02,880 understand what you're saying, but that that would be totally correct if there 720 00:58:01,680 --> 00:58:07,200 were not >> other ball courts already there. 721 00:58:05,359 --> 00:58:14,480 » Yeah. But there's a difference between 722 00:58:10,799 --> 00:58:17,880 base softball, baseball, and over at Alam Magnant 723 00:58:18,160 --> 00:58:29,440 than pickle ball and what we experience from residents 724 00:58:24,799 --> 00:58:33,760 that have um that live next to Red Oak. >> Oh, and I have one more question, 725 00:58:30,880 --> 00:58:39,200 Garrett. For the volleyball courts that are at Cliff Fen, are we looking at 726 00:58:37,760 --> 00:58:43,200 perhaps moving those anyway >> because they're on the other side? 727 00:58:40,960 --> 00:58:49,119 » No, this is just an council member Schultz. Um there there would be no plan 728 00:58:46,240 --> 00:58:56,400 to replace those volleyball courts unless we chose that as the location. 729 00:58:52,319 --> 00:59:01,119 And then we talked back on October 15th of 2025 that if we did do that, it might 730 00:58:59,200 --> 00:59:04,640 make sense to put it at a Crystal Beach or something like that. Right. 731 00:59:02,559 --> 00:59:08,559 » Okay. That's Yes. Okay. I wanted to make sure that that was still on discussion 732 00:59:06,559 --> 00:59:14,240 that um if we are looking at moving those volleyball courts, Crystal Beach 733 00:59:10,960 --> 00:59:17,040 might be a better location for those. So, thank you. Okay. 734 00:59:15,280 --> 00:59:20,799 » And Crystal Beach is where they play volleyball right now. 735 00:59:20,319 --> 00:59:25,520 » Yeah, >> correct. We we have league play at 736 00:59:22,720 --> 00:59:28,880 Cliffn and Alamagnet and and Crystal Beach is 737 00:59:26,799 --> 00:59:30,960 » on any nice day. It's there's almost always people out there using that 738 00:59:30,400 --> 00:59:32,240 location. >> Yeah, 739 00:59:31,440 --> 00:59:36,160 » that is correct. >> It's a pickup. 740 00:59:34,240 --> 00:59:39,040 » I'd also like to add I'm also okay not doing pickle ball at all at this point 741 00:59:38,319 --> 00:59:42,760 um >> as a viable option. 742 00:59:43,599 --> 00:59:51,839 » I understand. So the thing is the question the policy question is council 743 00:59:48,720 --> 00:59:57,200 members do we want to continue with the pickle ball project 744 00:59:54,319 --> 01:00:04,400 » and do we agree that cliff park is what 745 01:00:01,920 --> 01:00:09,760 staff should be focusing their attention to 746 01:00:07,119 --> 01:00:14,880 » when did we when was this originally supposed to break ground like what year 747 01:00:12,799 --> 01:00:19,040 » 24 I think No, >> like we're three years ago, right? 748 01:00:17,280 --> 01:00:21,359 » Two or three. Yeah. I mean, goes back that long. 749 01:00:19,680 --> 01:00:24,160 » I mean, I'm I'm actually kind of with Vince. 750 01:00:22,640 --> 01:00:28,880 » I mean, it's [clears throat] >> surprisette. 751 01:00:26,000 --> 01:00:33,520 » It's been three years. from my perspective is the integrity of 752 01:00:31,599 --> 01:00:40,720 our communication with everybody, the pickle ball 753 01:00:37,200 --> 01:00:47,160 community as well as the residents and and all of the other stakeholders. 754 01:00:44,160 --> 01:00:47,160 So 755 01:00:48,079 --> 01:01:00,400 staff is waiting for us to say do we move on with a pickle ball 756 01:00:56,400 --> 01:01:06,799 and it's cliff the next. I mean there this had been worked on with staff and 757 01:01:03,359 --> 01:01:10,240 the communities both the pickle ball community and the soccer 758 01:01:09,119 --> 01:01:13,040 community. So >> I've already said move on with cliff 759 01:01:11,760 --> 01:01:16,079 fence. Okay. >> Just waiting for the rest of them to 760 01:01:14,559 --> 01:01:21,520 figure it out. >> I'm actually uh no for doing it at all 761 01:01:18,400 --> 01:01:27,692 at this point. It's we're we're way past. So, 762 01:01:24,880 --> 01:01:31,200 » well, people still [clears throat] [snorts] 763 01:01:29,200 --> 01:01:38,720 are saying to us that they they would like pickle ball and uh we said that we 764 01:01:35,359 --> 01:01:46,400 would proceed with a project and have set aside money for it. Dan Keelley. 765 01:01:43,839 --> 01:01:51,280 » Uh I think there's a an open question on that we should 766 01:01:48,559 --> 01:01:57,440 address. Do we have any data on what the current trends for usage uh and demand? 767 01:01:55,440 --> 01:02:03,040 I know I continue to hear people going to other cities that can't get on Red 768 01:02:00,319 --> 01:02:08,400 Oak, but uh and of course there's private uh providers popping up. my 769 01:02:06,960 --> 01:02:14,400 couple of my family members go to Lakeville where they can swipe a card, 770 01:02:10,480 --> 01:02:20,748 get in and play um without any staff being there. It's kind of like a 771 01:02:16,400 --> 01:02:24,000 self-use gym sort of like but um [clears throat] 772 01:02:21,599 --> 01:02:26,880 do we have any data, >> Garrett? 773 01:02:24,480 --> 01:02:31,280 » Uh Council Member Keley, I will reiterate that all of the information 774 01:02:28,720 --> 01:02:36,960 that we've shared tonight is from our past projects. We have not updated any 775 01:02:33,520 --> 01:02:41,280 new information on this in regards to community engagement, 776 01:02:38,880 --> 01:02:45,119 uh, studies on number of people in Bernzo playing, anything like that. So, 777 01:02:44,000 --> 01:02:50,079 » okay, >> Madame Mayor, I'll I'll I'll share some 778 01:02:47,440 --> 01:02:54,079 information that just popped up. National trends, younger, faster, and 779 01:02:52,480 --> 01:02:57,520 dominated by entertainment. The numbers are staggering. According to Sports and 780 01:02:55,599 --> 01:03:03,040 Fitness Industry Association, the active pickle ball participation hit 24 million 781 01:03:00,240 --> 01:03:08,480 Americans. Experts project active player numbers to easily clear 27 to 29 782 01:03:06,160 --> 01:03:12,240 million. The demographics have flipped. The stereotype of pickle ball being for 783 01:03:10,079 --> 01:03:16,400 seniors is dead. The fastest growing demographic is actual players under 24 784 01:03:15,119 --> 01:03:20,640 years old >> which is the Gen Z. 785 01:03:18,160 --> 01:03:24,938 » Today roughly 70% of all players are under 45 and the average player age is 786 01:03:23,440 --> 01:03:27,440 sitting in the mid-30s. >> [snorts] 787 01:03:24,960 --> 01:03:31,680 » the top golfificication of the sport. Simply building concrete 788 01:03:29,599 --> 01:03:35,520 slabs and public parks is no longer enough to meet demand. We're seeing a 789 01:03:33,680 --> 01:03:39,680 massive wave of private capital flowing into the massive indoor entertainment 790 01:03:37,599 --> 01:03:44,160 venues, social hubs featuring professionalgrade courts, high-end food, 791 01:03:41,839 --> 01:03:47,039 craft cocktails, and lounge areas. We're not going to be in that business, but um 792 01:03:46,720 --> 01:03:48,559 » it >> because that's what the younger crowd 793 01:03:48,319 --> 01:03:51,440 want. >> Yeah. So, what you're saying that there 794 01:03:49,920 --> 01:03:55,359 is a demand. >> There is there is still huge demand. 795 01:03:53,920 --> 01:03:58,720 too. They're looking for a little bit more than just public 796 01:03:56,880 --> 01:04:03,440 » public courts. They're looking for, you know, 797 01:04:01,200 --> 01:04:08,160 » what I'm seeing is that Vince, you're saying you don't want to do a a ball. 798 01:04:06,319 --> 01:04:11,520 » I'm just I'm in different I you know, if the three of if there's three votes to 799 01:04:10,079 --> 01:04:15,480 move forward with cliff, I'm not going to fight you on it. Um, 800 01:04:16,160 --> 01:04:22,920 it's just a lot of money to spend on >> Well, 801 01:04:23,359 --> 01:04:29,359 and Cara, you said you don't want to move forward with the pickle ball. 802 01:04:27,359 --> 01:04:34,559 » Yeah. I mean, that's that's pretty much where I'm at. I'm not I'm not like 803 01:04:31,520 --> 01:04:40,720 » not as I'm not I'm not a hard no on this, but I am definitely not a yes on 804 01:04:37,920 --> 01:04:45,039 this at this point. It >> Okay. 805 01:04:42,160 --> 01:04:52,240 that the time to do it is like when it's doing the upswing. But yes, now we are 806 01:04:48,160 --> 01:04:59,799 and I do understand the having public courts because you're not paying to use 807 01:04:55,200 --> 01:04:59,799 those, right? Um, 808 01:05:02,079 --> 01:05:07,119 » but man, I'm just not >> I'm not I'm not enthused after after 809 01:05:06,400 --> 01:05:11,440 after >> after three years of this and it and and 810 01:05:09,760 --> 01:05:15,520 it's not even going to break ground until what May of 2027. 811 01:05:13,920 --> 01:05:20,520 » People have been patient with our process. I am trying to be 812 01:05:21,039 --> 01:05:27,280 to have the integrity because people have been patient with 813 01:05:25,280 --> 01:05:34,000 our process and we're arrived here at the point 814 01:05:29,680 --> 01:05:43,280 where Rose Park isn't um a viable option for us anymore but Cliff Fen is 815 01:05:37,680 --> 01:05:49,920 and Dan Keley you have read an analysis that it's still a high demand and people 816 01:05:46,319 --> 01:05:55,920 still want to see a pickle ball uh pickle ball courts in Burnsville. So, 817 01:05:53,440 --> 01:06:01,760 I'm a cliff fan because from the very beginning it was the one that isn't 818 01:05:58,319 --> 01:06:08,079 close to any resident. It's around uh an industrial area and 819 01:06:05,200 --> 01:06:12,319 so it's not going to have that impact on people. So, yes, 820 01:06:10,079 --> 01:06:16,799 » I just there's a sort of a takeaway statement here. Pickle ball is no longer 821 01:06:14,160 --> 01:06:20,799 just a trend. It's cemented itself as a standard piece of municipal 822 01:06:18,960 --> 01:06:24,799 » and commercial infrastructure for cold weather states like Minnesota. The next 823 01:06:22,640 --> 01:06:27,599 phase is growing into highquality indoor access, 824 01:06:25,599 --> 01:06:30,240 » but that doesn't replace, you know, the sort of the the need for 825 01:06:29,760 --> 01:06:34,400 » public >> free public courts for those that want 826 01:06:32,480 --> 01:06:38,559 to play. And it does say it's even though the the growth is in the Gen Z, 827 01:06:36,799 --> 01:06:42,079 it's still multigenerational. There's still a lot of people 828 01:06:40,240 --> 01:06:46,640 » uh seniors who still play it. It's kind of um they were the the first 829 01:06:44,640 --> 01:06:50,079 demographic to really pick up on it. >> Yeah. 830 01:06:47,119 --> 01:06:55,680 » Um so I I I would say I haven't changed my position. Um I liked Cliff Ven the 831 01:06:54,160 --> 01:06:57,039 last time we talked about this. I still like Cliff Ven. 832 01:06:56,559 --> 01:07:03,200 » Okay. >> Um I think it um Vince's point is very 833 01:07:01,119 --> 01:07:05,760 valid. It's it's a budding a >> Yeah. 834 01:07:03,680 --> 01:07:12,240 » Uh a nature preserve. It's going to have the same type of negative impact. So, 835 01:07:08,079 --> 01:07:17,359 both locations have that. Um, it's in an industrial area where I would prefer to 836 01:07:14,240 --> 01:07:21,200 see it because of the noise. Um, I think, you know, I think I might have 837 01:07:18,960 --> 01:07:27,839 said this last time, the inventors of the sport didn't really think through 838 01:07:23,520 --> 01:07:31,280 the ball texture and and uh makeup like >> tennis ball. It's a lot quieter. Well, 839 01:07:29,440 --> 01:07:34,720 they they could have actually made a ball, but they threw it together and it 840 01:07:33,039 --> 01:07:38,079 just caught on like wildfire before they could even perfect it. Mhm. 841 01:07:36,079 --> 01:07:40,960 » So, it is what it is. Unfortunately, it's noisy. 842 01:07:39,359 --> 01:07:43,440 » So, you're you're >> I'm in favor of moving forward with 843 01:07:42,640 --> 01:07:45,680 Cliffn. >> Okay. So, um 844 01:07:45,119 --> 01:07:50,640 » that's very >> There are three three votes to move 845 01:07:47,520 --> 01:07:55,359 forward with Cliff Fen. >> Okay. 846 01:07:53,599 --> 01:07:59,359 » Is there anything else that you need from us with regard to the policy 847 01:07:57,920 --> 01:08:02,880 question? >> Madame Mayor, there is not. uh we have 848 01:08:01,280 --> 01:08:07,039 direction to continue with the project and to focus on cliffn as the location. 849 01:08:05,920 --> 01:08:12,720 » Okay. >> And then you can let the pickle ball 850 01:08:10,000 --> 01:08:17,359 community also know that what what transpired tonight. 851 01:08:14,880 --> 01:08:22,400 » Yes, madame mayor. We would uh as I mentioned, we would plan to do an 852 01:08:19,359 --> 01:08:27,920 engagement time period with a popup at Cliff Park. Um do a mailing like we have 853 01:08:25,679 --> 01:08:33,199 to the neighborhood around there, businesses, uh etc. 854 01:08:30,640 --> 01:08:39,440 make sure that the Burns Athletic Club was invited to participate um and 855 01:08:37,199 --> 01:08:43,920 continue to share the information. So, >> okay, thank you very much. 856 01:08:42,239 --> 01:08:50,719 Okay, now we um move on to round table and 857 01:08:48,400 --> 01:08:55,040 there is a signed ordinance amendment on a round table and I believe council 858 01:08:52,640 --> 01:08:58,040 member Keely this is yours. >> Yes. 859 01:08:59,279 --> 01:09:06,799 Uh, council members and mayor, uh, the primary reason I'm asking for the 860 01:09:04,239 --> 01:09:12,640 council to consider an amendment to our signed ordinance in uh, in a couple of 861 01:09:09,279 --> 01:09:17,759 zones, types of zones, is is that the upper facade, high level roof line 862 01:09:14,480 --> 01:09:22,319 signage for multi-story office and mixeduse buildings has some real 863 01:09:19,839 --> 01:09:26,960 benefits. And when we talked about this back when we were doing the signage in 864 01:09:24,480 --> 01:09:30,319 the HO hotc, there [snorts] was one building that came to mind. And I didn't 865 01:09:28,400 --> 01:09:34,799 think about the second building. Um, and I wondered why they didn't have 866 01:09:32,640 --> 01:09:38,960 anything. It's a four or five. It's a five-story building because as you drive 867 01:09:37,359 --> 01:09:44,000 around the Twin Cities, you see all those buildings have signage that um 868 01:09:42,239 --> 01:09:49,120 runs along the very top edge of the building. And from my retail side, I 869 01:09:47,520 --> 01:09:52,560 think, well, every retailer wants that, right? You know, you want to be able to 870 01:09:50,880 --> 01:09:57,679 say, "This is where I'm at, right? This is my company." Um, but in the in the 871 01:09:55,280 --> 01:10:02,000 case of office, it's it's more about being a key employment hub. Um, and a 872 01:10:00,480 --> 01:10:07,920 lot of large companies that are looking to locate do want to put their sign up 873 01:10:05,120 --> 01:10:11,120 because um, they might be a large user of square footage. They might be a 874 01:10:09,600 --> 01:10:16,000 company that's bringing some good jobs and they kind of want that branding out 875 01:10:13,040 --> 01:10:19,840 there. Um, it provides visual navigation along corridors, of course, and it 876 01:10:17,920 --> 01:10:24,480 serves an e as an economic development tool to attract major corporate anchor 877 01:10:22,159 --> 01:10:29,520 tenants for brand visibility, which happens to be what happened here. Um, 878 01:10:27,440 --> 01:10:35,840 there is an application that has been in the city for a while in the building. 879 01:10:32,560 --> 01:10:39,679 Um, it's called um >> well, it's the only 880 01:10:37,840 --> 01:10:43,360 » uh grant it's a gateway office plaza. >> Yeah. It's the only fivestory office 881 01:10:42,000 --> 01:10:46,960 building that we have. >> And um and that's the building that I 882 01:10:45,440 --> 01:10:50,320 remember thinking about when we were redoing the zoning thinking like 883 01:10:48,640 --> 01:10:53,600 monument sign there that doesn't. And I don't I couldn't even find a sign. If 884 01:10:51,840 --> 01:10:57,280 they have a monument [snorts] sign, it's not showing up on Google Maps. When I I 885 01:10:55,679 --> 01:11:01,199 did the street view, I was thinking they must have something like that. But um 886 01:10:59,520 --> 01:11:05,760 couldn't find anything unless it's it's hiding behind some bushes. 887 01:11:03,520 --> 01:11:10,159 But that's the that's the circumstance that drew our attention to it, which is 888 01:11:07,679 --> 01:11:15,199 kind of the way even when we go through the code and we do a thorough review, 889 01:11:12,239 --> 01:11:19,920 you can't predict everything. And that was the one that I remember thinking 890 01:11:17,040 --> 01:11:23,920 about like maybe we should allow signs like these types of buildings have on in 891 01:11:21,679 --> 01:11:27,360 other cities. And we didn't address it at the time because there wasn't really 892 01:11:25,440 --> 01:11:31,199 a driving need. Now there's a there's a there's an inquiry. And I thought about 893 01:11:30,080 --> 01:11:36,159 it. I thought, well, there's another building. Um, Grand Market Square is 894 01:11:34,159 --> 01:11:38,719 » We do have a sign for Grandtory. Yeah, it has the 895 01:11:36,800 --> 01:11:43,760 » There's It's right on the at the top. >> It doesn't have a brand sign. It has the 896 01:11:41,600 --> 01:11:50,000 » building name sign, right? Not not the tenants name. 897 01:11:45,120 --> 01:11:53,280 » Uh, so, uh, you know, as a city, um, we certainly want to attract corporate 898 01:11:51,520 --> 01:11:58,239 tenants, uh, because they usually bring good paying jobs. Um, in past years we 899 01:11:56,560 --> 01:12:03,440 we did a process where council member Scholes pride up eliminating building 900 01:12:00,239 --> 01:12:08,480 heights in certain zones. Hard the city was one, the mall center village was 901 01:12:05,760 --> 01:12:12,239 another, and then I think it was maybe a portion of Highway 13, and maybe that's 902 01:12:10,320 --> 01:12:16,159 just all part of HOTC, but I remember you specifically saying like Highway 13 903 01:12:14,159 --> 01:12:21,679 and like I35, but that might be encompassed in the HOTC. Um, and so we 904 01:12:19,840 --> 01:12:25,520 did we we removed the building height. So we were hoping that would draw some, 905 01:12:23,920 --> 01:12:28,960 you know, when when some of those areas get redeveloped, some of those office 906 01:12:27,040 --> 01:12:32,480 complexes that are one-story, if somebody comes in and buys it and they 907 01:12:30,159 --> 01:12:38,640 want to do a multi-story building, that'd be great. Um, so I think this 908 01:12:36,640 --> 01:12:43,920 this is not just about that one application. This made me think broadly 909 01:12:41,040 --> 01:12:49,040 about um these two major zones with no building height and the future. what is 910 01:12:46,640 --> 01:12:54,239 it going to attract and how could that be enhanced to attract more people who 911 01:12:52,000 --> 01:12:58,960 might build a multi-story building especially if they it usually starts I 912 01:12:56,800 --> 01:13:03,600 mean office construction isn't pure speculative they usually have two or 913 01:13:01,600 --> 01:13:07,679 three major tenants lined up in advance of acquiring the property and building 914 01:13:05,440 --> 01:13:12,000 the multi-story building and those major tenants will look for can I have my 915 01:13:10,000 --> 01:13:17,679 brand on the outside of the building in our city right now they cannot um so My 916 01:13:15,840 --> 01:13:22,800 suggestion is to for us to consider changing our ordinance for buildings 917 01:13:19,520 --> 01:13:27,920 that are three stories or higher uh that are office or office mixed use. Right? 918 01:13:25,440 --> 01:13:31,840 This is not meant for residential or apartment buildings. This is strictly 919 01:13:29,840 --> 01:13:35,520 business buildings. And we have two Grand Market Square and Gateway Office 920 01:13:33,520 --> 01:13:38,480 Plaza that would fall under this. So here's some examples of what you see 921 01:13:37,040 --> 01:13:42,640 when you drive around. Health Partners corporate office in Bloomington. Um 922 01:13:41,040 --> 01:13:47,679 formerly Seridian the Day Force headquarters. uh multi-story buildings 923 01:13:44,880 --> 01:13:53,760 in suburbs. Richfield has Best Buy, of course, that's ginormous uh multiple 924 01:13:50,960 --> 01:13:57,600 buildings. Um St. Louis Park has Bridgewater Bank corporate headquarters 925 01:13:55,360 --> 01:14:03,120 and they're a first tier suburb. Eden Prairie and Minnetonka have uh Optum 926 01:14:00,800 --> 01:14:04,880 United Health has some monster buildings and of course they want their brand on 927 01:14:04,400 --> 01:14:10,640 the outside. >> So does M Health here in Burnsville. 928 01:14:07,199 --> 01:14:14,080 » Yeah. So, it's I think we we just didn't have something compelling at the time to 929 01:14:12,239 --> 01:14:17,360 draw attention to it. Now, we do, and I think it's the right thing to do, not 930 01:14:15,840 --> 01:14:21,760 only for today, but for the future, for both of these buildings and hopefully 931 01:14:19,600 --> 01:14:27,199 some future buildings that get built. Um, 932 01:14:23,840 --> 01:14:31,040 I think that it's a it's a common sense recommendation because it's really not 933 01:14:28,640 --> 01:14:36,560 uncommon in other suburbs and certainly cities. And I think I would suggest that 934 01:14:33,440 --> 01:14:41,280 we adjust the uh the ordinance to allow these to have and and I'm talking very 935 01:14:39,040 --> 01:14:47,679 specific. These are right along the roof line. These are not down on any given 936 01:14:44,159 --> 01:14:52,159 floor. These are only uh what you would uh consider a roof line sign and it 937 01:14:50,400 --> 01:14:57,600 would have to be individual backlit letters the quality that we require uh 938 01:14:55,040 --> 01:15:01,440 in the rest of our city. uh fitting within a particular size that 939 01:14:59,920 --> 01:15:05,600 can be those kind of details can be worked out by staff uh if they bring it 940 01:15:03,440 --> 01:15:09,920 back to us if the council agrees with this concept. 941 01:15:07,760 --> 01:15:17,040 I agree that we need to amend our sign ordinance, Dan, 942 01:15:12,800 --> 01:15:21,120 but it's from my perspective that's something that we're going to 943 01:15:18,719 --> 01:15:29,120 have staff would have to do a lot of work to look at that and to do it 944 01:15:24,640 --> 01:15:36,400 throughout the city. And uh I believe there is amendments coming in I think in 945 01:15:33,120 --> 01:15:43,120 a second phase for zoning. Jeff, am I correct in that? The zoning amendments 946 01:15:39,679 --> 01:15:48,480 that would fit right in to that. But I want to address 947 01:15:45,360 --> 01:15:54,480 what this applicant wants and we can make I think staff had a 948 01:15:51,679 --> 01:16:01,840 pathway for this applicant to get that done for what they want to do at the 949 01:15:58,080 --> 01:16:07,920 gateway building. And then because the bulk of the work in looking 950 01:16:04,480 --> 01:16:14,960 at a comprehensive sign ordinance is going to take time but I want to address 951 01:16:12,239 --> 01:16:24,159 the immediate need um for this particular applicant. So, if 952 01:16:18,480 --> 01:16:30,560 we can do that and then have staff look at the sign ordinance during the work 953 01:16:27,360 --> 01:16:35,280 that they're doing with the second phase of the zoning ordinance 954 01:16:33,040 --> 01:16:40,960 and so they know that we want it throughout the whole city, but I want to 955 01:16:38,400 --> 01:16:44,560 get this one done for this applicant for gateway if that's okay. Yeah, I think I 956 01:16:43,920 --> 01:16:48,480 just I wouldn't want >> I think we have a concept that I I 957 01:16:46,800 --> 01:16:53,920 believe they have a concept they want to bring to us and we can amend because 958 01:16:50,640 --> 01:16:57,920 this is only about the DOT the the transit oriented development 959 01:16:56,159 --> 01:17:02,000 » the to do they have to pay >> that's that's the one that Yeah. And 960 01:16:59,760 --> 01:17:05,663 what they're proposing is I have a picture of it. It's it's a sign that 961 01:17:03,679 --> 01:17:09,440 runs right along the roof line. That's [snorts] exactly what I'm talking about, 962 01:17:06,800 --> 01:17:13,360 which is what other, you know, that's why I'm saying 963 01:17:11,199 --> 01:17:14,960 » let's just address that so they can move forward. 964 01:17:13,840 --> 01:17:18,880 » I don't have a problem with that. I just don't want to go I don't want them to go 965 01:17:16,480 --> 01:17:22,400 through any additional expense as a result of them coming in as a special 966 01:17:20,560 --> 01:17:26,560 because our ordinance doesn't support it. I think our ordinance is wrong and I 967 01:17:24,800 --> 01:17:30,719 think we need to fix the ordinance and that they or anybody behind them can do 968 01:17:29,040 --> 01:17:34,800 this like a normal assignment. >> I agree with that. But this is this is 969 01:17:32,719 --> 01:17:41,040 the concept. They're not going to be it's like any concept development that a 970 01:17:37,600 --> 01:17:45,199 a developer brings before us before they spend any more money. You know, is it a 971 01:17:44,000 --> 01:17:48,080 go or no go? >> Yeah. 972 01:17:45,840 --> 01:17:52,960 » So, [snorts] that's all I'm saying. It's it's not something that we haven't done 973 01:17:50,640 --> 01:17:58,400 with concept development >> and and I think that's what staff had 974 01:17:56,000 --> 01:18:01,880 asked them to do. It's not going to cost them any money 975 01:18:02,320 --> 01:18:10,719 » to do the concert. >> Is that correct? City Manager Lindber. 976 01:18:08,000 --> 01:18:17,440 » Madame Mayor, members of the council, I it is correct that there is a that our 977 01:18:13,280 --> 01:18:21,840 team planning team uh has been uh talking with the property owners, 978 01:18:19,440 --> 01:18:28,000 individuals involved. Uh there is not a current application. uh our team uh and 979 01:18:25,520 --> 01:18:33,360 you might recall that there I shared with you in early June uh that our team 980 01:18:31,120 --> 01:18:39,280 had offered the councils at the time brand new newly adopted consulate plan 981 01:18:36,239 --> 01:18:42,960 review process in order to expedite an opportunity ahead of an application 982 01:18:41,760 --> 01:18:49,120 ahead of >> the applicable fees for the applicant or 983 01:18:46,080 --> 01:18:55,679 escrow that would be required uh in the city's adopted fee schedule. um the 984 01:18:52,960 --> 01:18:59,760 opportunity to come talk to the council about the concept which is the spirit of 985 01:18:57,440 --> 01:19:04,719 that that planning tool as it's now adopted into ordinance. Uh so um at the 986 01:19:03,600 --> 01:19:09,760 end of the day >> uh hopefully that helps clarify process 987 01:19:07,920 --> 01:19:13,120 and where we're at. Uh but there's no there's no application right now and 988 01:19:11,280 --> 01:19:17,440 there wouldn't be fees until the point of application. But they they bring a 989 01:19:15,199 --> 01:19:22,960 concept just like the >> I just want to I I think they'd be 990 01:19:20,320 --> 01:19:28,000 perfectly acceptable to that. >> I think they were thrown a curve on the 991 01:19:26,239 --> 01:19:32,239 success rate and it made them a little apprehensive. And so I just said, you 992 01:19:30,800 --> 01:19:36,560 know, you can come back and and deal with staff. I want to deal with the 993 01:19:33,840 --> 01:19:39,440 ordinance. The ordinance is changing is >> because it's not about them. It's about 994 01:19:38,800 --> 01:19:43,760 Grand [snorts and clears throat] Market and any other building that might be 995 01:19:41,520 --> 01:19:46,080 looked upon as built in Burnsville and having the ability to put those brands 996 01:19:45,360 --> 01:19:50,640 along the top. >> I I agree with that, but I but that 997 01:19:48,239 --> 01:19:54,480 takes such a long time, but they need to get this done now 998 01:19:52,480 --> 01:20:00,960 » and we've done and we've done concept before. Uh look at old old Highway 34. 999 01:19:58,719 --> 01:20:05,280 They came with a concept >> because it was a residential area. They 1000 01:20:02,960 --> 01:20:10,880 didn't have and so when we said sure go ahead they were able to move forward 1001 01:20:07,520 --> 01:20:15,080 then and then file an application >> cara 1002 01:20:11,360 --> 01:20:15,080 » so what is the cost 1003 01:20:15,600 --> 01:20:20,719 » of an application >> yeah madam mayor members of the council 1004 01:20:18,719 --> 01:20:23,280 I would have to look that up I looks like Jeff might have the information 1005 01:20:22,159 --> 01:20:25,440 available >> mayor council 1006 01:20:24,159 --> 01:20:29,679 » come in with a concept >> yeah I was just looking at our 2026 1007 01:20:27,199 --> 01:20:33,600 adopted fee schedule and there's uh for us uh concept plan review uh which is 1008 01:20:32,080 --> 01:20:36,480 the coming directly to the council for policy direction ahead of a formal 1009 01:20:35,360 --> 01:20:39,920 application. >> There's there's two charges that the 1010 01:20:37,920 --> 01:20:45,760 city has. There's the application fee which is $422 1011 01:20:42,480 --> 01:20:49,360 and that's to cover um hard costs of the city, right? Mailings and stuff and then 1012 01:20:47,360 --> 01:20:54,640 there is also as as we do with every development application a $2,000 escrow 1013 01:20:51,600 --> 01:20:58,239 deposit and that's to pay for any um external costs that the city 1014 01:20:55,840 --> 01:21:03,040 » may have to pay that for a concept to come before us. uh mayor, in the fee 1015 01:21:01,040 --> 01:21:07,280 schedule, it still includes that escrow for a for a concept plan review because 1016 01:21:06,239 --> 01:21:12,320 there have been a couple times where we've done um some 1017 01:21:10,800 --> 01:21:16,640 it's usually engineering consultants, not applicable in this case, or uh legal 1018 01:21:14,719 --> 01:21:20,400 fees, anything any um external costs that we incur, would they be paid from 1019 01:21:18,159 --> 01:21:24,080 that escrow? If there are none, we would re we would return that money. Um um 1020 01:21:22,800 --> 01:21:26,880 otherwise, we would pay those expenses and and reimburse the any sort of 1021 01:21:25,760 --> 01:21:31,040 difference between the deposits. Is this an engineering thing or or just a 1022 01:21:29,679 --> 01:21:33,920 aesthetics thing that we're talking about? 1023 01:21:32,800 --> 01:21:37,600 » Yeah, Jeff. >> I mean, when you talk about signs, 1024 01:21:35,600 --> 01:21:42,080 you're >> mayor and council. I would anticipate in 1025 01:21:39,360 --> 01:21:46,000 a concept plan review such as this, the I I would anticipate the only expense we 1026 01:21:43,920 --> 01:21:50,000 could incur is any legal fees that be necessary just to draft the ordinance 1027 01:21:47,840 --> 01:21:54,320 changes or or whatnot. But that's the only the concept uh fee I can anticipate 1028 01:21:52,800 --> 01:21:57,280 for this project. >> Yeah. 1029 01:21:56,000 --> 01:22:00,639 Okay. >> City manager, did you have a thought? 1030 01:22:00,239 --> 01:22:04,560 » Yeah, >> I was going to I was going to say I have 1031 01:22:02,400 --> 01:22:08,560 uh first of all, three stories I think is too high. I think it should be two 1032 01:22:06,239 --> 01:22:12,480 stories on signings if we're going to do signage. But we we do have a process 1033 01:22:11,199 --> 01:22:16,159 we're going through with our planning commission right now with the title 10 1034 01:22:13,840 --> 01:22:20,480 and title 11 and all that which that can be addressed at that. Uh staff has shown 1035 01:22:18,800 --> 01:22:23,360 us a way or shown this applicant a way to come in with a concept and we can 1036 01:22:21,920 --> 01:22:27,280 look at and say, "Yeah, we like that, we don't like that." and he can move 1037 01:22:24,400 --> 01:22:31,360 forward with it uh rather quickly. I I'm reluctant to just make an ordinance 1038 01:22:29,040 --> 01:22:34,800 change without looking at the whole city and all the different zones that we have 1039 01:22:32,880 --> 01:22:39,199 in the city and so that we get it right the first time and we don't keep 1040 01:22:36,639 --> 01:22:43,280 peacemealing this all the time. Uh you know, you referred to the track record 1041 01:22:40,800 --> 01:22:46,400 of turning down signs. I don't recall ever turning down a sign in the 20ome 1042 01:22:45,120 --> 01:22:48,960 years I've been here. >> Have you seen Bob signs? 1043 01:22:47,600 --> 01:22:51,679 » I'm not sure where that track record's coming from that he's concerned about 1044 01:22:50,560 --> 01:22:54,320 because >> you I'm not talking about leaving the 1045 01:22:53,840 --> 01:22:57,360 meeting >> whatever you're referring to. 1046 01:22:55,679 --> 01:23:00,560 » Well, you had referred that he was reluctant to do things because of the 1047 01:22:58,800 --> 01:23:04,000 track record of getting things done with the signage and 1048 01:23:01,679 --> 01:23:05,040 » it's not nothing to do with anyone but him. 1049 01:23:04,480 --> 01:23:09,280 » Okay. >> Well, what was the track record? 1050 01:23:07,600 --> 01:23:13,679 » Nothing to do with anyone else but him. >> I wasn't referring to any past history 1051 01:23:11,120 --> 01:23:16,880 of any other just his situation. >> Okay. So, he's had a track record with 1052 01:23:15,199 --> 01:23:20,320 other cities, >> not this city. 1053 01:23:17,760 --> 01:23:23,280 » No, that is not true. >> I think we'll just let staff handle it. 1054 01:23:22,000 --> 01:23:25,360 » Well, I'm Okay. I'm just saying I don't recall ever turning down a sign. That's 1055 01:23:24,800 --> 01:23:28,800 all I'm saying. >> No, I I never said that. 1056 01:23:27,199 --> 01:23:31,920 » Okay. >> Civility. 1057 01:23:29,520 --> 01:23:35,760 » That's not a track record problem then. >> I'm saying we're good. We're very pro 1058 01:23:33,920 --> 01:23:43,679 business. Yeah. I I believe. >> Yeah. So, so we can give some direction. 1059 01:23:40,800 --> 01:23:48,960 This is the policy question. Do we want to just focus on this one 1060 01:23:47,280 --> 01:23:52,159 application to come in for a concept? 1061 01:23:50,719 --> 01:23:56,400 » Well, that's a separate thing. What I'm presenting is a change to the ordinance. 1062 01:23:53,840 --> 01:23:59,760 This is I'm not >> that's just the thing that brought my 1063 01:23:58,400 --> 01:24:01,600 attention to the ordinance. >> I agree with you with that. It's just 1064 01:24:01,280 --> 01:24:05,520 that >> I think staff can handle that situation 1065 01:24:05,120 --> 01:24:08,400 » just fine. >> We have no problem change the ordinance 1066 01:24:07,120 --> 01:24:10,480 as we go through the process with planning because that's what they're 1067 01:24:09,679 --> 01:24:13,520 there to do. >> Yeah. If there are if that's already on 1068 01:24:12,000 --> 01:24:18,159 the boards to get and it'll get caught up in that scoop. Sure. Absolutely. 1069 01:24:15,679 --> 01:24:23,920 » That so yeah, and that's where I'm saying we're in that process. So 1070 01:24:21,679 --> 01:24:29,600 » that's a good idea. But this Yeah. >> Okay. So stay with the process that but 1071 01:24:27,040 --> 01:24:33,760 do we >> for the applicant let them know that 1072 01:24:31,280 --> 01:24:38,880 they can come in >> staff will handle it. 1073 01:24:35,120 --> 01:24:43,040 » Okay. All right. So >> next 1074 01:24:40,639 --> 01:24:46,800 » ju just just so we're clear uh madam members of the council the your current 1075 01:24:44,639 --> 01:24:52,719 your current current ordinance and how we would uh approach administration of 1076 01:24:49,440 --> 01:24:57,120 this uh would be either what the planning team has currently suggested to 1077 01:24:55,040 --> 01:25:02,719 the applicant which is come in for a concept review uh that would would would 1078 01:24:59,920 --> 01:25:08,560 then necessitate the fees and escrow that we discussed. Um uh an alternative 1079 01:25:06,320 --> 01:25:12,880 that council member Keley did suggest tonight and I just want to make sure 1080 01:25:09,600 --> 01:25:18,159 that we're we're clear would be a uh really at the end of the day and Dan 1081 01:25:15,040 --> 01:25:24,639 explained this well uh but as I understand it uh the the your current 1082 01:25:21,679 --> 01:25:30,639 ordinance current city regulations uh the TOD is the only zoning district 1083 01:25:28,719 --> 01:25:36,960 where this particular issue would prohibit uh top of building signage. 1084 01:25:33,679 --> 01:25:42,480 age. So a a potential shorter term opportunity would be deal 1085 01:25:40,719 --> 01:25:47,120 with that issue. If a majority of the council wishes to change policy 1086 01:25:44,880 --> 01:25:52,960 direction, deal with that issue, which then would expedite the process and 1087 01:25:49,840 --> 01:25:58,239 eliminate the need for a concept review. Now, that would be outside of what I 1088 01:25:56,159 --> 01:26:01,120 could do administratively, right? And that would require city council 1089 01:25:59,600 --> 01:26:04,480 direction tonight. So, I just want to make sure that we're all on the same 1090 01:26:02,719 --> 01:26:08,880 page when it when it comes to the most efficient and effective way through what 1091 01:26:07,040 --> 01:26:14,320 council member Keely has raised tonight. I I think I'm hearing general support of 1092 01:26:12,159 --> 01:26:16,400 the city council to >> Yeah. So, you're 1093 01:26:14,960 --> 01:26:21,920 » I like the second thing you said. >> Yeah. supportive of 1094 01:26:19,440 --> 01:26:25,600 looking at the ordinance amendment for >> simple change 1095 01:26:22,560 --> 01:26:29,040 » just the tod right itself we would narrowly have the council 1096 01:26:27,679 --> 01:26:34,320 address >> the the the tod the the the narrow topic 1097 01:26:32,560 --> 01:26:38,960 and then I've also heard the direction from the council that as part of the 1098 01:26:36,480 --> 01:26:42,800 plan title 10 and title 11 process we want to look holistically at the issue 1099 01:26:40,800 --> 01:26:46,320 of signage I need to talk to our team more about what that looks like to be 1100 01:26:44,320 --> 01:26:49,760 very honest with you there are many priorities ities that are going to come 1101 01:26:47,679 --> 01:26:54,400 up through that review process following the comprehensive plan and we'll have to 1102 01:26:51,920 --> 01:26:56,560 talk capacity timing. >> Yeah. 1103 01:26:54,800 --> 01:26:59,760 » Conversations with council to make sure that we're looking at the nuance. 1104 01:26:58,320 --> 01:27:04,400 Council member Gustoson, you brought up a good a good point. There are 1105 01:27:01,600 --> 01:27:08,320 » there are a number of factors uh across zoning districts that that would 1106 01:27:06,320 --> 01:27:12,560 potentially need to be dealt with and we can mark that for mayor to your 1107 01:27:10,639 --> 01:27:16,320 suggestion other suggestion the the longer term future solution if that's if 1108 01:27:14,800 --> 01:27:20,320 that's the desire of the council. Again, I don't want to get ahead of the 1109 01:27:18,560 --> 01:27:24,400 majority of the council here, but just looking for clarity and efficient and 1110 01:27:22,159 --> 01:27:28,239 effective outcomes based on where I think I'm hearing the majority of you 1111 01:27:26,639 --> 01:27:32,159 are are talking from. >> Yeah. 1112 01:27:28,800 --> 01:27:33,120 » So, to first part and second part. >> Yeah. 1113 01:27:32,560 --> 01:27:39,199 » Yes. >> Do do the comprehensive sign ordinance 1114 01:27:36,480 --> 01:27:44,480 review with with everything that's going on with title 10 and 11 1115 01:27:41,679 --> 01:27:49,840 » which separately from just the to as a carve out because That's yeah, 1116 01:27:48,239 --> 01:27:52,719 we can do that real quick and easy. >> And that's Yeah. And that's what I'm 1117 01:27:51,760 --> 01:27:57,360 saying. >> Address this item. 1118 01:27:55,120 --> 01:28:00,639 » Okay. Again, I didn't want to get I don't want to get in the middle of the 1119 01:27:58,320 --> 01:28:03,199 council's policy discussion here. I just >> You're just clarifying. 1120 01:28:01,760 --> 01:28:07,120 » You offered a fast lane. You know, if you've been to Valley Fair, there's a 1121 01:28:04,480 --> 01:28:09,520 fast lane. We're to the fast lane and let the other the whole rest of it take 1122 01:28:08,960 --> 01:28:16,159 the >> And that's what I said at the beginning. 1123 01:28:11,440 --> 01:28:22,000 Let's deal with this so it it expedites the desire of the applicant. Deal with 1124 01:28:19,520 --> 01:28:25,920 the heart of the city, the city with the to and scoop up the everything else. 1125 01:28:25,679 --> 01:28:29,679 » Yep. >> Yeah, I think that's what he said. Yep. 1126 01:28:27,520 --> 01:28:34,400 I'm That's sounds great. >> Okay. And that's 1127 01:28:33,040 --> 01:28:37,600 » Let's back up a minute here. >> It's 1128 01:28:34,880 --> 01:28:40,400 » so we've got lane too fast. >> We've got heart of the city. We're just 1129 01:28:39,040 --> 01:28:44,639 talking. >> So you remember that the heart of the 1130 01:28:42,159 --> 01:28:51,360 city is now the whole city. >> Yeah. Yeah. It's no longer HOC1 and 1131 01:28:47,840 --> 01:28:54,320 HOC2. The whole thing has been >> identified as a transit oriented 1132 01:28:53,600 --> 01:28:58,560 development. >> We're going to tot it. 1133 01:28:55,600 --> 01:29:01,760 » Um I'm fine with that. I again I didn't speak to this because I don't have any 1134 01:28:59,600 --> 01:29:06,159 background or understanding of that. I didn't even know we had that restriction 1135 01:29:03,120 --> 01:29:08,960 in our to um and it's kind of seems silly that we do now that I'm aware of 1136 01:29:08,000 --> 01:29:14,239 it. So, >> well, so 1137 01:29:11,040 --> 01:29:18,080 » because we have Hey, there's there's a grand marketplace 1138 01:29:16,000 --> 01:29:20,800 » and there is a and there's a grand market. 1139 01:29:18,880 --> 01:29:26,159 » I mean, I go down the road, you see the building where part of the city dental 1140 01:29:22,320 --> 01:29:28,960 is uh old national bank and that looks great there. I don't know why we 1141 01:29:27,440 --> 01:29:31,040 couldn't replicate that on Gate building. 1142 01:29:29,360 --> 01:29:35,679 » You got First National Bank and you also have the Ames Center. Madam, mayor, 1143 01:29:33,600 --> 01:29:38,400 members of the council, um, in spite of my attempt to be efficient and 1144 01:29:37,040 --> 01:29:40,800 effective, it looks like Jeff might have a question that I want to make sure gets 1145 01:29:40,000 --> 01:29:43,840 asked. >> Just mayor and council. [laughter] 1146 01:29:42,880 --> 01:29:47,920 » Nope. >> I am now going to listen to Jeff. 1147 01:29:45,520 --> 01:29:52,880 » This is a me problem. >> Again, just for Yeah, just for clarity. 1148 01:29:50,560 --> 01:29:56,800 » Um, I understand that the the discussion is happening, you know, doing a targeted 1149 01:29:55,280 --> 01:30:01,040 amendment for the TOD district. Just to clarify, that is for rooftop wall 1150 01:29:58,960 --> 01:30:04,239 signage for office and commercial buildings within the to district, not a 1151 01:30:02,880 --> 01:30:07,440 comprehensive review of the todd district. 1152 01:30:05,120 --> 01:30:11,360 » Correct. The the comprehensive is on your process. 1153 01:30:08,639 --> 01:30:18,080 » Yeah. The comprehensive one is on the process that's going on right now with 1154 01:30:14,960 --> 01:30:20,239 phase two of the zoning ordinance. Phase two of the zoning 1155 01:30:19,040 --> 01:30:23,120 » and that's why we have expert professional staff that aren't me. 1156 01:30:22,152 --> 01:30:24,639 [laughter] So, thank you, ma'am. >> Okay. 1157 01:30:23,600 --> 01:30:26,639 » No, that's good. >> Okay. Everybody, 1158 01:30:25,600 --> 01:30:29,199 » I think that's the only thing we missed when we did that to thing a few years 1159 01:30:28,159 --> 01:30:32,560 ago is just this. >> Okay. 1160 01:30:30,000 --> 01:30:37,120 » Everybody understand? We're just dealing with the amendment for this applicant 1161 01:30:36,080 --> 01:30:42,000 in the to >> Yep. 1162 01:30:38,880 --> 01:30:49,760 » Everything else is on your uh comprehensive view of um our 1163 01:30:46,159 --> 01:30:54,639 zoning ordinance second phase. Okay, everybody on board? Okay, we're moving 1164 01:30:52,560 --> 01:31:00,320 on. Um, and now 1165 01:30:58,080 --> 01:31:03,600 Michelle, you want to schedule a meeting to canvas the primary? 1166 01:31:02,000 --> 01:31:12,560 » Yes. Thank you, madame mayor, city council. We um do have a city primary on 1167 01:31:07,679 --> 01:31:17,840 the um primary election August 11th. And so we will need to schedule a special 1168 01:31:14,639 --> 01:31:23,760 meeting to canvas those results. uh the statute is not very flexible whereas it 1169 01:31:21,520 --> 01:31:29,600 says we are required to do it three days after which makes it August 14th 1170 01:31:28,080 --> 01:31:32,960 and um >> so we have to do it 12th 13th or 14th 1171 01:31:32,080 --> 01:31:35,520 » the 14th >> just the 14th 1172 01:31:34,239 --> 01:31:38,239 » the statute also >> just telling us we have to be here on 1173 01:31:36,639 --> 01:31:43,199 the 14th is what you're telling us >> the statute says 1174 01:31:40,239 --> 01:31:47,760 » the statute says that it we can do it on the 13th if the county allows us to and 1175 01:31:45,679 --> 01:31:50,239 we tried to do that one time and it was two two days is just too fast of a 1176 01:31:49,440 --> 01:31:54,000 turnaround. >> So you're saying the 14th. Is everybody 1177 01:31:52,560 --> 01:31:57,440 okay on the 14th? >> Mon Monday the 14th. [clears throat] 1178 01:31:55,840 --> 01:32:00,320 » No, it's Friday the 14th. >> August 14th. 1179 01:31:58,320 --> 01:32:02,719 » August. Sorry. >> August the 14th 1180 01:32:01,920 --> 01:32:07,600 » at 5. >> Yeah, go for it. I won't be here. 1181 01:32:05,643 --> 01:32:12,320 [laughter] >> It can be it can be at noon. It can be 1182 01:32:10,719 --> 01:32:13,199 » Yeah, I'm good any time of day on that day. 1183 01:32:12,719 --> 01:32:21,120 » Okay. >> Okay. So, uh, Vince and Dan G. Dan K, 1184 01:32:20,080 --> 01:32:22,719 » uh, the 14th. >> Yeah. 1185 01:32:21,360 --> 01:32:26,400 » What time you want to do it? >> Do you want to do line? Um, noon or 1186 01:32:25,520 --> 01:32:28,320 » It takes 10 minutes. >> Takes 10 minutes. 1187 01:32:26,960 --> 01:32:29,120 » Yeah. Oh, noon's fine. >> Noon. 1188 01:32:28,800 --> 01:32:31,360 » Noon. >> Noon. Sounds good. 1189 01:32:30,159 --> 01:32:37,600 » Okay. >> Okay. Very good. Okay. With that then, 1190 01:32:35,280 --> 01:32:43,679 um, reports, Vince? >> No reports. Oh, come uh watch uh Never 1191 01:32:41,840 --> 01:32:46,159 mind. We're good. [cough] Oh, >> what was that? 1192 01:32:44,400 --> 01:32:50,960 » I was going to put out a word for Burnsville. Burnsville is hosting the 1193 01:32:48,159 --> 01:32:54,480 MBL state baseball tournament at Sue Fisher 1194 01:32:52,719 --> 01:32:58,800 and Savage Community Fields this weekend. So 1195 01:32:57,040 --> 01:33:01,280 10A, it's very specific, but >> yeah, 1196 01:32:59,440 --> 01:33:05,520 » experience Burnsville cancelled their meeting on Thursday. Our next meeting 1197 01:33:02,880 --> 01:33:08,639 will be in August. Okay, Carol, 1198 01:33:07,760 --> 01:33:12,040 » Dad, >> I have a small 1199 01:33:13,360 --> 01:33:18,239 you don't have to listen. [laughter] >> Metro Cities Transportation General 1200 01:33:16,320 --> 01:33:22,080 Government starts Monday the 27th. All of us that are on assigned committees 1201 01:33:19,840 --> 01:33:25,679 will start probably that week if not before. Uh National League of Cities 1202 01:33:24,239 --> 01:33:30,080 held their summer leadership conference in Louisville, Kentucky. It's about a 1203 01:33:27,600 --> 01:33:34,480 three and a half day event. Um, it's held at the current president's uh 1204 01:33:32,159 --> 01:33:38,080 hometown which uh he's a council member in Louisville. Louisville if as I 1205 01:33:37,679 --> 01:33:41,840 learned >> actually that's how they say it. 1206 01:33:39,360 --> 01:33:46,239 » Uh just uh sitting on the executive committee we talked about the 2027 1207 01:33:43,440 --> 01:33:51,679 budget and the challenges um membership growth u managing cost. There's a giant 1208 01:33:49,440 --> 01:33:55,520 reduction in federal grants which is uh going to have a corresponding reduction 1209 01:33:53,120 --> 01:34:02,239 in staff because a lot of staff is there to um write and nurture grants. Um we 1210 01:34:00,239 --> 01:34:06,159 talked about the office of uh management budgets proposed grant changes which is 1211 01:34:04,159 --> 01:34:10,320 there's out it's a public uh comment period right now which is has some 1212 01:34:08,080 --> 01:34:16,239 significant impacts. We also discussed the success of the road to housing act 1213 01:34:13,920 --> 01:34:20,639 um and the large effort by NLC's lobbying and and membership cities 1214 01:34:18,159 --> 01:34:25,280 across the country. Um we also talked about u the new I think it's A250 it's 1215 01:34:23,679 --> 01:34:29,920 it's probably not that [cough] it's signing the Declaration of Independence. 1216 01:34:27,199 --> 01:34:35,199 It's a it's a website where you can go on and I'll I can share the QR code 1217 01:34:32,880 --> 01:34:40,800 where you can actually sign on behalf of your city. All of us can um essentially 1218 01:34:38,960 --> 01:34:45,120 reaffirming the Declaration of Independence. So, it's a effort that's 1219 01:34:42,880 --> 01:34:47,600 going across the country uh through the National League of City. 1220 01:34:46,080 --> 01:34:50,000 » So, my signature wasn't good enough the first time? 1221 01:34:48,400 --> 01:34:55,760 » No, it wasn't big enough. We need to do it larger. Um, and then they released 1222 01:34:52,960 --> 01:35:00,800 the uh the 2026 state of the cities report which uh which was a recorded 1223 01:34:57,920 --> 01:35:05,760 presentation and uh it included a panel which included Mayor Kim Norton from 1224 01:35:02,560 --> 01:35:10,639 Rochester uh who I I sat with and presented to the League of Minnesota 1225 01:35:07,840 --> 01:35:21,920 Cities board earlier this year on the civility um uh deal. So the sorry um the 1226 01:35:18,000 --> 01:35:26,080 civility index and etc. So uh she was there with uh a mayor from a really 1227 01:35:24,320 --> 01:35:30,239 small really small like a couple thousand people suburb of Birmingham 1228 01:35:27,920 --> 01:35:34,320 Birmingham Alabama. So we had fairly goodsized city and a really small city 1229 01:35:32,320 --> 01:35:37,679 represented u talking about all the issues which I'll run through them very 1230 01:35:35,679 --> 01:35:41,920 quickly. Number one across the country economic growth was the first priority 1231 01:35:39,920 --> 01:35:47,360 on city's minds. Infrastructure and housing are more are the most critical. 1232 01:35:45,040 --> 01:35:56,000 uh concerns for an infrastructure cliff with ARPA and IIGJA in the uh sorry uh 1233 01:35:53,120 --> 01:35:59,760 infrastructure investments act uh are ending and cities expect negative impact 1234 01:35:58,000 --> 01:36:04,639 on infrastructure investment. Then of course housing affordability is a 1235 01:36:02,480 --> 01:36:10,000 widespread structural issue for every city across the country and public 1236 01:36:06,560 --> 01:36:13,760 safety strategies continue to evolve. Uh it was a very interesting report. Uh 1237 01:36:11,760 --> 01:36:19,040 it's out and available on their website. And then lastly, the suburban municipal 1238 01:36:16,080 --> 01:36:23,840 council got together uh aka first tier suburbs uh which is uh one of the 1239 01:36:21,760 --> 01:36:28,239 councils uh under the national league of cities uh I've been a part of for many 1240 01:36:25,760 --> 01:36:32,320 years. I didn't I didn't join right away because it said first year's suburbs and 1241 01:36:30,320 --> 01:36:36,400 we're a second tier. So I thought we don't have a party we can join. And then 1242 01:36:34,320 --> 01:36:40,719 somebody told me just I mentioned it rand randomly to a member of the the 1243 01:36:39,040 --> 01:36:44,960 lobbing staff and she said oh no that's open to all suburbs. I went, "Good. We 1244 01:36:43,120 --> 01:36:49,280 need to rebrand that." That was [snorts] four or five years ago, 5 years ago. We 1245 01:36:47,440 --> 01:36:52,800 finally got it done this year and it's going to be called the Suburban 1246 01:36:50,800 --> 01:36:57,520 Municipal Council. And the reason it couldn't be Suburban Cities Council is 1247 01:36:54,880 --> 01:37:01,199 that is the same acronym for small cities council. So, they wanted a 1248 01:36:59,679 --> 01:37:05,840 separate acronym because they use that structurally. And uh so I'm going to 1249 01:37:04,080 --> 01:37:10,320 refer to it and I told them I'm going to always say it's the suburban cities 1250 01:37:07,199 --> 01:37:14,639 group council but suburban municipal council that will become officially 1251 01:37:11,840 --> 01:37:21,679 effective at November's city summit which is held in Nashville, Tennessee. 1252 01:37:18,719 --> 01:37:25,440 And we took a tour uh our group the council members took a tour to a small 1253 01:37:24,080 --> 01:37:33,920 suburban town that's going through some major um redevelopment. It's called uh 1254 01:37:30,560 --> 01:37:38,159 uh Jamestown, Kentucky. And uh it was very we had the mayor 1255 01:37:35,840 --> 01:37:42,480 there who gave a a nice speech and and their economic development director and 1256 01:37:40,719 --> 01:37:47,440 uh some other folks and and talked about what they have going on. The one thing I 1257 01:37:44,239 --> 01:37:52,960 will I will say to in close, they have a massive industrial park. When you look 1258 01:37:49,520 --> 01:37:59,440 at the map of their city limits, 40% of the square miles 1259 01:37:55,600 --> 01:38:04,560 is is an industrial park. It's enormous and of course it brings an enormous 1260 01:38:02,080 --> 01:38:10,960 amount of prosperity to the city. It's a huge income source. What they use, they 1261 01:38:08,159 --> 01:38:16,080 don't have property taxes like we do. They have an occupation tax. It's based 1262 01:38:13,840 --> 01:38:20,960 on your salary. It's like a an income tax that goes locally. And that is a 1263 01:38:18,800 --> 01:38:25,920 very big part of Kucky's economic model for cities is occupational tax. And 1264 01:38:23,360 --> 01:38:30,560 because they have that that largest industrial park I've ever seen in any 1265 01:38:27,520 --> 01:38:35,119 city, certainly a city of that size, um that provides a lot of financial support 1266 01:38:32,400 --> 01:38:39,760 for the city to operate. That's it. Thank you. 1267 01:38:37,440 --> 01:38:42,920 » I won't give a USCM report. >> Go ahead. 1268 01:38:43,040 --> 01:38:50,400 » Go ahead. >> It's okay. Uh and there's nothing else. 1269 01:38:47,679 --> 01:38:55,920 Burnsville Savage meeting is cancelled. Was supposed to be this Thursday. So, 1270 01:38:53,280 --> 01:38:58,880 but otherwise I know you need to go. >> Oh my goodness. 1271 01:38:57,040 --> 01:39:03,199 » There is nothing else. Anything from staff 1272 01:39:01,840 --> 01:39:07,320 with that? I did not. >> We stand adjourned by acclamation.