All right, we're going to call this meeting to order as the regular meeting of them.
We're going to call this meeting to order as the regular meeting of the city council for all the needs for a clock.
Tuesday, August 12th. If a regular feel is cold, can the lead us in invocations? All right.
Thank you.
Thank you for every council member.
Every city staff, all the concerns citizens that are here tonight for this important work to be had.
We'll be trust that all that are here will do thing decently and in order.
Guidance of wisdom that sees beyond our personal interests and seeks to will be involved.
Give us the clarity of mind to make sound decisions and the courage to address difficult issues.
In the compassion to hear everyone's voice.
Remind us of your word where you tell us this act justly.
Love mercy and it's what I'm doing before you.
Bless our city, our families, our businesses, our schools, and all that are here tonight.
Let peace, justice and unity take root in every part of our community and in our discourse.
Protect those who serve in public safety and meet the needs of our most vulnerable people.
May all this discuss and decide today or tonight.
Be guided by integrity, fairness, mercy and desire to honor you and all the services that we perform.
And all things going may you be glorified and we take no credit.
Listen, your son's Jesus name, I pray.
Amen.
All right, now for the pledge of allegiance.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
And to the Republic for the stands.
One day.
Amen.
All right, with that being said, before we go to approve the agenda, I would like to motion.
To move.
I don't.
It was the last one on action.
I'd like to motion to move item 13.3 to the August 26 meeting.
Second.
All right.
Second by council leader.
Any comments?
I think we got a lot of items to work through tonight and that's a good move to postpone that.
So we have more time to work through everything else we got tonight.
To follow up with that comment, those of you that are following along.
That is the item where we're going to have a discussion about moving city elections.
Moving city elections to November.
In the general election day.
So if you want to come back on the 26 if this vote does pass, please come back on August 26.
But we got a lot of it looks like some other business to discuss as well.
And we have a bunch of meeting at about 30 minutes.
So let's get a vote.
You can't or can't.
You can't.
I said hey.
Wait a second.
He's not voting.
You wish it to be the right answer to him.
All right.
All the favors say aye.
Aye.
Any nays?
All right.
Passing.
Seven o'clock.
All right.
So that approves the agenda recognition.
City of Fort Walton Beach.
Employee recognitions.
I'm going to come down there and recognize the people.
All right.
Employee recognition.
This is also an awesome opportunity to just honor and serve those who've been serving our city for a long time.
So with that being said, we got William Kota for 10 years of dedicated service to the city for Walton Beach.
Wait if you come up here.
Thank you.
Thanks.
Thank you.
Any comments you have as you part?
I'll just have a good time there.
It's a very retirement game.
Thank you for your service.
We really appreciate it.
All right.
We have for our growth management Mr. Timothy Gibson for five years of dedicated service.
Thank you.
All right.
I would also like to have an agenda
item that includes public works.
A agenda item number.
131 132.
That's the award of contract for public law construction.
I'd like to get a second to move those two items right after the consent agenda.
Second.
All right.
Ms. Barnes, let's go to a vote.
Can you still motion it?
I don't think I can.
All in favor to that we will put the agenda say.
Yeah.
In the opposed say no.
All right. Let's get that going right after the consent agenda.
Which that's for now.
So looking for a motion for the consent to approve the consent agenda.
Move to approve the consent agenda.
Okay.
Got a motion.
Mr. Jeezer.
Second.
Mr. Merrill.
Any comments?
Mr. Jeezer.
All in favor say aye.
Aye.
On a pose.
All right.
It's out of the consent agenda.
And I'm going to turn the order to out of 13.1 over.
All right.
Absolutely.
We definitely want this over there.
This is not where I was expecting to be.
I think it's on the slide.
Okay.
The consent agenda.
Now we've got council comments.
Oh, that's.
I'm up first.
I don't have any comments.
It's on.
Mr. Walk.
Oh, comments.
It's on.
We could.
Mr. Brown.
All right.
Mr. Bear.
All right.
Mr. Jeezer.
You had just like to say welcome there.
How great.
I'm looking for.
Yeah.
Good afternoon.
All right.
We stopped after my public comment.
So we're on being.
Okay.
Council coming.
I got you.
I'll pay.
Yes.
Fair enough.
All right.
Can Mr. Bradley.
All right.
We'll also save mine.
That brings us to public comments.
Is that correct?
All right.
Anyone from the public which we speak.
On any items that are not on tonight's agenda.
Please come forward.
Yes, sir.
Please.
Please take your name and your address.
Thank you.
That was wonderful.
Thank you.
Excuse me.
I live at 205.
I feel I haven't even known with West for a while.
A long time.
I have a good afternoon.
I am currently in speaking from the front-line.
And I don't have anybody to attend.
I'm not going to say anything about the environmental problem.
My comment.
We've been hearing a lot about Chester 프로 in the community.
So therefore that's what I want to talk about.
I have just wanted to give a brief history and I have a request for the Council at the end as well.
But I want everyone to remember who Chester 프로 was.
And it's just a community.
Chester 프로 was.
It's just a part of my first black police officer he was hired in 1948.
Rich Chester 프로.
He hired a bit of full time police officer in 1951.
can gave an unforeseen hope to the Black community. Most of his 15 years of service was during
the segregated time of Jim Crow. Chester Pruitt, although an officer, when he was hired,
could only arrest blacks during that time period he had the authority to detain and only question
white suspects, but he was always forbidden to arrest him. In spite of his inequalities in the
berries he faced, Chester Pruitt's legacy will also be remembered because he had a strong character.
The police force is certain.
Further back then, said Chester Pro was known to be a gifted mediator and a champion of youth. Chester Pro was loved and respected by all in the black community. He was someone they could trust. He knew how to make one fillet ease and spoke with respect and calmness that made everyone feel comfortable. Chester Pro had served our great city from 1948 to 1964, a stroke forced in the entire 1960-40 died for years later. This was an amazing accomplishment because our beloved openness to county did not even hire its first black,
a share until 1970-74, a person named Clifford Clark. But Chester Pro was so respected by the black community served and the others that appreciated service and dedication of part and a recreation center was named in his art.
The Chester Pro had part and the softball feel are considered to be sacred ground.
And it should always remain in its present location. The park includes a memorial walk of fame that lists other black leaders of the Chester Pro community who struggle and help pave the way to our own family legacies.
Chester Pro serves also as a ceremonial ground for annual and special events such as Mayday, Super Youth Day, the Easter egg hunts back to school supply giveaways and more and even private events.
In 1996 the forensic Chester Pro was created to serve as a non-profit organization. This organization continued to provide comfort and care to the community.
Their main focus mimic Chester Pro is daily agenda of looking out for the community, especially the senior citizens in our youth. His wife, Miss Lula Lula, Miss Lula.
The whole project was a founding member of this organization in Cushie 2 to help make a difference in this community.
In 2000 Chester Pro, it was one of 385 influential people who were honored as a grateful item by the Florida State Department of State and Florida League of Cities.
This honor has only been bestowed upon four people in Oklahoma's county, Dr. Bill, Eliza Jackson, Kate Bagley, and Chester Pro. We all know Dr. Bill and a pretty sure the street name won't be changed.
We all know where Eliza Jackson Park is located and I'm pretty sure throughout this history it won't change. And as far as Kate Bagley, she's a former mayor, but she'll be most not only remembered for burning McDonald's to this area.
I know that too, a couple of things in there. I was the president of the Friends of Chester Pro. When we started this thing, as far as history, I was the first black manager to work for McDonald's Corporation in this area for Kate Bagley.
So like I've been here for a long time seeing things change. But I say all of this to remind everyone that the best way to continue honor Chester Pro it.
And the service he gave to the city of Fullwell Beach is to honor him with this original park that bears his name in the community that he had the responsibility of policing is by letting this park remain in its permanent location.
To ensure this is never a topic again, we ask the community as Fullwell Beach Council to support the community's effort to say Chester Pro is legacy and forever let the harvester address be its forever location.
The community would like the mayor, the city manager or the city council to support us. The black community's effort to have Chester Pro at Park Establish as a state of Florida historical site.
We are prepared to offer a committee to work with any liaison to Joe want to appoint to do this and we're willing to do the work.
I want to thank you for the time that you've given me to state our cause. We want to thank you in advance for helping us save our legacy.
But I'd like to end this by reading to you a paragraph that was in the article written on Chester Pro at February 24, 2021. He broke barriers and set examples for others.
He added officers and community member still references name today with the sense of pride and understanding that even in the toughest times we can succeed.
The Fullwell Beach Police Department is forever grateful for his courage and devotion to our community. This statement was made during the black history month.
That statement was made by our current chief of police Robert Bage. He also said his legacy is timeless.
In this by saying Chester Pro is legacy not only should be timeless but always protected and respected. Thank you.
Yes, thank you very much sir. That's right. Quickly.
Very quickly. I'd like to make a motion of directing the staff to designate Chester Pro into part as a Florida historical site with the Florida Department of State, the vision of historical facts.
And I think that it should be designated that so that we would never have to be faced with this issue again.
And that we can continue to move on, develop the park as a historical site.
Give Chester Pro a legacy. Something should get back to our generation as well as the community that he served in to give him that recognition.
Have a motion by Ms. Riley.
By Councilman Schmidt to designate Chester Pro at Park as a historic site in the state of Florida.
May additional comments, Ms. Riley?
Yes. What I would like to let this dice as well as all of the members of the community that was setting here,
I want you all to know that Chester Pro with Park is near and dear to the community.
And I'm 100% supported.
It's been a legacy amongst many generations.
And many of our families that grew up here and resided.
And then Jeremy, tears, area of love with terrorist area.
The deal about this church, one of our first African American churches in the community.
I want you all to know that I firmly believe that the legacy of Chester Pro with should continue to live on within our community.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Yeah, there's no better way to say it, and especially coming from Ms. Riley.
But I would also like to thank Ms. Riley as well as Mr. Davis for taking time to go over beyond and serve and call them meeting in the afternoon and try to get the people and the community and the message out there.
So thank you.
And thank you, Mr. Davis, for filling those questions and Ms. Debbie, for filling that energy.
Because it was a good energy.
And I want to appreciate you all for your time.
Thank you.
You know what I was before?
Sure.
I want to say thank you for sharing that.
I've reviewed so much about it.
I'm a lover of history and to know that such a man was in the community and what a honor it is to end.
We spoke about all the years later.
Good work with him.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir.
Anyone else?
Come this side.
The motion does pass unanimously.
Thank you.
Please ask.
I just want everyone to know as well as if I could vote.
We would have had an age and nothing.
But anyone else from the public wish to come in on an item that's not on the agenda.
Ms. Reynolds.
Ms. Reynolds, 25 drick to would avenue for Walton.
And I am a 33 year retired teacher.
So I wanted to thank you for all you do.
And I wanted to say that what I'm going to ask you about tonight.
I've been doing this for three years.
And it's just, we need murals downtown.
We need art.
We need things that we have already in Penn, Penn,
Moss city.
We have it in Pensacola.
The bar.
Mobile.
And the Luxe.
And we need to look at that and say we need to make sure that that art is downtown.
I've counted a lot of walls.
We've got them down there.
I have a muralist right here for Galdo.
If you ever looked at the back of Southern cinema, he did that for free.
He can't do that anymore.
He needs to be paid minimally for what he does.
But he's so talented.
And I just wanted you to know the people that we need in murals.
This is where we live.
The 1992 Olympics, Carlton Tucker, Gary Gaphart,
and Randy Smith were there.
Number two, Gladys Milton.
She was a midwife.
She birthed over 2,000 babies in this county.
Three, Danny Warful.
We won the Heisman.
Four.
Henderson Beach, which was literally started by Cliff Reynolds
and his daddy, C.F. Reynolds.
He was the first principal at Fort Walton Beach High School.
Special Olympics, Charlie McFarlane, started that.
He was at Silver Sands for years and years.
Aliqua, Lori Hood.
It's a place where animals are treated correctly.
And I'm worried about socks.
Sarah Demandron, who just passed away.
She started socks, which is all the cats.
She's right back.
Three at my house.
Seven.
Dick Covey.
He was an astronaut.
From here.
Eight.
The do little Raiders.
Who go way back.
Nine.
Murdered at Sims.
Who started the ballet academy.
There's nowhere else in this area.
10 stage crafters.
They're back in the 50s.
They started.
11.
The golf area.
Which was one of the first in the state of Florida.
And then all the deputy sheriffs that have done so much quietly that need to have a mural
and a name up on a wall downtown.
Think about it.
I have a person who would paint.
We have walls down there that are city walls.
And they would be beautiful with history of Fort Walton Beach.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you, Ms. Reynolds.
Anyone else from the public wish to speak on an item that's not on the agenda tonight?
Yes, sir.
Hi.
My name is Elias Marty.
Also known as Gorgon.
I was there here in Fort Walton Beach.
Six, five, four, Bill Parkway.
Northwest.
I am the founder, the teacher, the principal.
The principal of this art school here in Fort Walton Beach.
Which there was none of before I did.
I am a product of this pandemic that rock us all.
I got brought to my attention that, well, art, because the underfunding has been taken away from
our children.
Okay.
None of my children at that point in time.
From the youngest to the oldest, had art in their curriculum being pushed.
Okay.
This is something that I have fed my kids or four of them with art.
Since I've started in, you know, in my career.
All right.
I started in my career.
I've been 26 years tattooing.
Okay.
I now teach the art of tattooing.
Okay.
I teach other leaders, like drawing with pencil, drawing with paint.
You know, in painting, you know, kids do not have this in school anymore as a curriculum.
Kids don't know how to hold a pencil, how light, how firm.
Okay.
They don't have this anymore.
They get doodles.
All right.
At least some of them.
I have kids in the system.
Okay.
In the school system.
And I know what they get.
They get the minimum.
Okay.
Then they get directed into the YouTube.
All right.
So to how to videos.
All right.
So I've been pushing myself to teach art for as cheap as I possibly can.
I only charge $10 for an hour for children to come in and down.
Okay.
The basics, the intermediate levels and even advanced levels.
Okay.
On multiple mediums.
I have other teachers that teach there.
There are skills like stained glass and glass bending.
Which shop were bringing all that back because there is it anymore in our schools.
Okay.
It becomes about creativity.
Creativity is dying.
The more and more.
You guys.
You know, more and more time passes.
It's dying.
Because we're relying to AI and our children anymore.
So as Reynolds came to me.
About three years ago.
As I'm pushing this art.
All right.
My intention was to literally paint the town.
They come from the city.
All right.
I've got to grow up in New York City.
Okay.
And it's.
It's.
It's inviting.
More than anything.
Okay.
Everybody wants to know about it.
Okay.
That was my.
My initial goal was to paint the town.
Ms. Reynolds came in.
I.
You know. She. She. She asked me if I could help her with this endeavor.
She had about.
She had about me or was and.
And the story.
You know, money.
A lot of people in this town.
And I said absolutely.
Because I was my plan to begin with.
What better than to honor the town.
But, you know, putting up their historians.
Okay.
Who will know.
Who's from here.
Okay.
So I.
I. I did help her.
And I did do this meal.
That is in the back of substance.
You know, because it's.
To me it was the only historical place that.
That.
You know, that I could know.
You know, that.
That I was told about.
That was the initial.
Then I was told about the other ones that.
Ms. Reynolds just mentioned.
And more than glad to do it.
All right.
just to push the historic people from this community, but also to push the art skill that pushes
the school for our community. Again, I'd like to repeat that we charge just
from the tubions for kids. Nobody brings anything to our...
We supply everything. What we charge done is just to keep going to push this article. I did do this work for
her for free. I told her, yes, I'm more than glad to do it. There was many historians in this town,
but I cannot do it for free. It hurt my business. Me stepping away over 300 hours to do this work. I had
to even sign it just on the principle. It hurts me to put that much work into a city that is not pushing forward.
I will keep being here. If you look my business up, I am a five-star business since I started. I've been here now six years. Still pushing, still by myself.
I'm looking for some kind of funding to help historical people from this town and the art to keep pushing it for our children.
You said your business is at 654BL. Is that the one that's right there at the intersection by Domain?
Such a nice building and everything you've done to design had to go in there.
The marquee out front with the words on the oil change. It's always great. I take my kids to school. We drive right by that. It's always very interesting.
And I think you've done a really nice job with that business. I appreciate what you've done so far.
In the community and I hope that we can work together on some things in the future.
Thank you, sir.
Anyone else from the public wish to speak on anything? Yes, sir.
I just want to say, I want to add just to prove it to my list.
That's a good one.
Well done, Mr. Mills. Yes, sir.
I'm Dave Hancock.
One 13-brick street won't be registered in the old condos.
I know a couple of four about our efforts to get the garbage facility located in the landing.
I just wanted to first thank a public.
I'm many of the city councilman individually over the last month.
The ones I have to talk to you don't worry about it. I'll get you into it.
I just love it. But I know you'll have a lot on your plate.
You don't get this, okay?
Because one of these days will come time to break around and where the things to go.
So, just remember, we don't want to garbage facility with ovaries and waking us up at six in the morning when the trucks come to empty it.
So, don't forget us.
Thank you. All of you for listening to me, okay? That's great.
Thank you, Mr. Hancock.
Anyone else wish to speak on any items that are not on tonight's agenda?
Yes, ma'am.
Please support me, 2021 Beach Beach Drive.
I have nothing fun with work to talk about.
But very briefly, the short-term rental ordinance that we passed
and is now hung out because of SB 180 is my understanding.
That's why we can enforce it at this point.
Do we have any idea where that stands?
Who interprets that?
Who is going to tell us if we can enforce that or not?
Sure.
I could direct that to our city attorney, Mr. Burns.
He could probably speak to that point.
Yeah, I'm sure he is.
I'm going to tell you about this last year.
From the year to the year we have approved quality orders.
So, we've never passed this last August.
As a part of do, but in the east action, there was passed via SB 180.
And we identified two orders.
This is at work.
We're going to be able to count so we won't be able to choose from our ordinance.
Together, the river ordinance.
The short-term rental ordinance.
We can remember it was passed for a late-game.
It was too much back.
And at that time, by the time, they really want to take the decision to start
or forcing it.
It was dealt with by the SB 180 and got signed.
So, they've never actually taken the steps.
And I've divided it.
They've taken the steps without seeking my advice.
And once they came, as it does, it's a strong decision.
Because we need to probably use to make a big rights to choose from our ordinance.
So, I would say it's probably going to be come back to all.
We're in the next three meetings.
Then at any minutes or minutes.
On that particular one.
Thank you.
I missed a rough recovery.
Thank you.
I miss a rough recovery.
My question is.
Guys, I decided to hold off home.
What?
Is it to share with the public what?
It calls those two ordinances.
That is the past.
It'll, or, held off home.
There's this portion to them.
Not their entire responsibility.
This portion is a each ordinance that could argue the way we're about,
as we want to be by way and all are strict.
So, if it's restrictive, we'll fall in a million views.
It's possible.
Okay.
Thank you.
Anyone else from the public which to speak on any items, not on the agenda time?
All right.
Then we will move to item 13.1, which is under action direction discussion.
A work contract for published parking lot construction at 147
We have a group street southeast.
We believe we do have the annual payment via whatever technology we're using on these
direct streets up here.
Mr. Payton, you are an oil employee.
Yes, sir.
Okay.
This evening.
It's not a committee item.
We have a committee item.
Last December.
As you can see, Council of Authorities may answer to excuse the agreement property that's
on any settlement.
Mr. Payton, on the next one or seven post-treating of the person part of it.
We have executed that.
In September, it's on grantment move through with design.
For example, you know, for that kind of product at least.
So, we have this on.
We have the existing residents out there to vote.
And we have the contract or the lease that we have.
So, the base plan has to go in.
So, it's kind of item is basically utilized.
It's just a contractor that's there at the money.
It does it.
It should be followed by our person policy.
But our person policy does have a couple of sections that have to be served to serve as
hands.
I'm a person to see Council of Authorities.
I'm a head of Billings, not the best interest.
And the other one is other document.
We're just a positive and a sense of searching.
So, if you're a positive manager, it's a council.
Now, I think those are more explanation.
And part of it, part of it, part of it, part of it is, we understand that base plan is being hit right, basically, you know, now.
So, we're trying to be conscientious about that.
And we get, we get across here and you can go hold my heart.
But to see getting processes.
You know, it's lately.
There's stuff in front of that, like we've seen.
So, this was a kind of great amount of trying to get things done.
You know, the cost of the project is budget.
And this is a huge budget.
You know, the presentation is this two way, the person policy, the card and the competitive solicitations.
What it concerns, you know, where it's the GSC, he's done a work online.
We have to see terms and draft contract.
Those things look pretty advantageous.
Things look down.
How I didn't find, you know, all of it.
So, how it goes.
This is not everyone on here.
We just want to be conscientious of the base plan.
The M.A. trying to find great ways to make these things done.
So, the Dow or the answer to the questions that you recognize here tonight.
Thank you, Mr. Payne.
Questions from the council for Mr. Daniel Payne and Mr. Schmidt.
Mr. Payne, I appreciate it.
The perspective of trying to make it quick, quicker.
With this contract, have anything zipped up pretty tight where the period of performance,
there's some kind of penalty if it's not done by a certain time.
Yes, so right now, we have a on-day substantial completion.
Which means you have basically a lot of interviews.
Another 30 days, which takes you to the launch point, just for the answer that I got.
You know, like landscape and things like that.
The department wants to be used on that stuff.
We do have a draft contract.
Now, we have obviously really to get up to anyone because we don't want to get to approval first
or not.
But I'm willing to put in the damages that we have would be basically a standard.
You know, that comes from the BSE.
And it's around to get for the price.
It's here based on the price of work.
But it's basically lost somewhere.
It's been somewhere.
It's somewhere between 500 and 7200 and a little bit of damages on that stuff.
And then, like you said, you had...
That's what I was getting ready to say.
Like you said, you had to negotiate anything.
But I want to 7 would like to lean towards a very tight period of performance.
That obviously realistic with staff evaluation of what is a realistic period of performance,
but just trying to get this site buttoned up.
Thank you.
Anyone else?
Questions?
Mr. Walker.
I just want to question, I believe, on 3.1, the cost of constructing the parking lot is funded and included in the 2425 budget within the half-cent sales tax.
Is that funds are available or it was already earmarked?
Do you want to give us earmarked?
Yes.
And what was that number?
Do you recall?
The budget number we had was, I think, about half a million.
Okay, so it's 50,000 under that budget you had to set in there.
Okay.
Thank you.
Anyone else questions for Mr. Penny?
Seeing none anyone from the public wishes to keep on this item?
So you want to counsel to you wish to take any action on this item?
Mr. Mayor, I moved away from the purchasing policy and award GLC contracting.
Terms to be negotiated.
With a performance calls on there is councilman Schmidt suggested.
And the amount of $41,690 and $70 and $70.
Second.
Motion by councilman Geter, second by councilman Schmidt to award the contract to the public parking lot construction at 147 strip southeast with those changes.
Councilman Geter anything further?
Thank you, Jason and Daniel for realizing that we are paying on this property.
We need to speed the process up and get it done.
This contract is already down there.
It's a competitive price and we're going to hold them accountable to get it done as quickly as possible.
Thank you.
Yeah, thanks.
Mr. Davis and Mr. Payne for looking at our purchasing policies and what we can do creative to try to expedite this process.
Thank you.
Anyone else wish to speak on the item?
Please vote council.
The motion does pass unanimously.
Seven nil brings us to item 32.
Amendment number one.
The dinner local agreement between localists.
Accounting in the city is Fort Walton Beach, Florida.
For the design of the around the mound project.
Mr. Davis.
Yes.
I'm Daniel speaking to that.
That's in the packet that you have, Jeff.
Is the agreement?
Yes.
We're going to.
Accounting is going to be on the original 650.
And we're coming in the rest.
We are going to have to navigate the licenses.
That's one of the.
Something like that.
Just to get that.
It's been like a couple of two million out.
But we're ready to move forward.
So that's in that agreement for you to sign for the county.
We're good here in the house.
Good job.
Good morning.
And the original contract.
How do you continue to see that the grant had to be awarded.
So there was to be able to get back to the county.
Get them actually really to least.
Provide the original funding.
So that's what the secret.
A school class.
Coach.
Anyone.
I'm a council with questions for this.
Mr. Smith.
Excuse me, Mr. Davis.
But what's the amount that we're pulling out of the city side to fund this product?
Two million to my $5 million.
Okay.
That's right.
Well, just before we fly over this really quickly.
I just want to encourage council.
I think we're going to get support for this.
But we've heard a lot from the citizens advisory committee on the TPO
Transportation Planning Organization to really try to advocate to marry the two projects
between the end of the bridge and the beginning of the around the mountain.
It's a substantial amount of money.
I can clearly understand.
But thank you to the county for contributing that $600,000.
But this is going to get it closer to starting the around the mountain projects.
Closer to the end of the bridge completion.
So that hopefully from a traffic management standpoint we can get those orange
kinds off our street underneath 10 years and get that process up.
So thank you.
Thank you, sir.
Anyone else with a question for Mr. Davis?
Mr. Walker.
Just want to clarify.
I'm going to remember that sometime I try to figure out all the flows together.
But the PB&E is not due now until the point.
But getting the first of next year.
I believe.
Yes.
Or maybe.
Spring and spring.
Yeah.
So it's modern understanding.
And I know you've got as on the transportation side of the river.
You're not going to have to help you with it.
But if the PB&E comes back as cost prohibitive.
This money that's being set aside, it is back into general funds, what happens to the money.
Because right now it's just being set aside, now it's located, it's not being set aside.
Sir, I think it was neighbor's compliance with the question.
Yeah, everything else that doesn't get spent, it will get put back in a house and fund fund fund.
You should always feel it's odd to me that we're improving funding for the plans when we don't know if the PD&E is going to support it.
So that's what I would concern certainly.
And you know, so with a question, Mr. Jeter.
I also would like to ask Mr. Davis, would it be wise or possible to reach out to the chamber who we just paid an amount of money to you?
And I think this would be a good place to ask them to help us come up with outside the box, thanking for other ways of funding.
They have a large, the chamber is very good at that.
There's one thing they're good at, they're good at getting behind projects, being them across the finish line, going to different areas.
And maybe in the same process, they're able to come up with some additional funding from other places to help us with that money.
But we have to really, really, you know, the amount of money so that we can spend some money on their services.
So this is the, they have reached out, they're going to be here tonight to offer that conflict with the guests.
I think that's an additional conversation.
The county, I've said it on many of meetings and the county has actually what they use the chamber for the same type of services.
I think they're all enough. We should do that too. I think I'd be great.
And councilmember, I think that's an excellent idea.
I did recently speak with some folks at the chamber and I know that they are there.
Or is organizing some sort of effort toward that in.
And I completely agree with you and they would also agree with you.
Obviously I'm not putting in words of anybody's mouth, but I think they're getting a little organized to try that.
To try to help fund that project.
I would be great if they're able to come up with more than the amount of money we pay them annually.
It would be a good investor.
I'd be a good return.
I guess we're talking 2 million versus 25,000.
It probably would be a low bar for them to clear, but I think that they could certainly do that.
Anyone else?
Questions for Mr. Davis?
Anyone from the public wish to speak on this side?
She was just waving hello.
Just wanted to make sure you're just about time to wait.
What is that?
There's, oh yes ma'am, I'm sorry I didn't see you.
Yeah, you can come up with me as ma'am.
Just please take your name and address.
My name is to treat fellow miles.
I look at 238 watts and drive them off the last two people on each floor.
Just in listening to the dollars that we're discussing here.
Are we talking about allocating funds?
Or are there going to be, if you guys think, for some more hines,
as citizens?
Whether we're looking at increased fees for each other.
And each of these services are increased fees and taxes to comfort some of these costs.
So I could definitely answer that question point.
So no ma'am.
Any raising of fees or raising fees for any services that are provided by the city?
That would be a whole separate thing that we would have to have a meeting about.
And include in a meeting and notice to the public as well.
So anything that we're talking about here tonight, including this project,
would be something that is either already budgeted for, or that we are making an amendment
to a previous budget or pushing onto a future budget.
But as far as this item here, Mr. Anders, could you kind of explain the funding?
And where if we were to fund the $2 million and $25,000, where that would come from?
All right, so we have a special revenue fund for the asset sales tax.
And right now we have about 7 million in the restricted fund balance in there.
So it would come out of there.
And then if we didn't use it, it would fall back into that fund balance to use for something else.
So who would be increasing anything for any services?
And just for explanation for the public because I know not everybody is super excited about watching
every meeting and learning every terminology.
The absence sales tax money is the additional half penny that we pay on every purchase that we make that is a taxable purchase.
Our county is designated a bunch of that money, and then obviously each municipality, each city,
gets a share of that money as well.
And we are able to spend it on projects that are non-recurring projects.
So building a park, having a design of something that would hopefully improve our traffic for the downtown,
pretty significantly, those are things that fall into that.
I'm Mr. Walker.
You said you were explaining 3.1.3, the hot end does not have a budgetary impact,
which calls it the five full users.
Let's see.
Okay.
Thank you.
Great.
Thank you.
Hey, when I was from the public which to speak on this item.
Council, do you have any action to take on this item?
I'd like to make a motion to respectfully recommend Council to authorize for the mayor to execute.
The proposed amendment to the interlocal agreement between Occlusive County and the City of
Fort Wart Beach for design of the around-the-mount project.
Second.
The motion made by Councilman Schmidt and seconded by Councilman Geter to approve the interlocal agreement
between Occlusive County and the City of Fort Wart and Beach for the design of the around-the-mount project.
Is it true?
Yes.
Mr. Davis and I were recently the transportation meet this past week, where multiple agencies, multiple
institutions, whether it's EDC to our military friends, they're looking for other ways to get density
to give cars off of highway 98 through other collector roads, other creative ways.
This project that we're talking about is way more than just creating more vibrancy for downtown for a while,
but it's to complement and to go along with the huge need of trying to improve the mission readiness.
A lot of our economy, a lot of our local folks rely on the military.
The traffic and those kind of things that are impacting us on highway 98 are directly impacting our economy.
It really is that directive of an effect.
So yes, it is a big price tag.
And yes, it's something that we've been talking about for over eight years going through the bureaucratic planning process.
I'm very hopeful and excited about paying for this design product to get it further down the road.
Thank you, sir.
Mr. Judy.
Yeah, I echo everything he said.
I love the way that he drugged the EDC and Mr. Clarkson, with helping us with the same thing we're asking the chamber to do.
I think they both can help get this across the finish on force.
Well said.
Thank you, sir, Mr. Wall.
Sure, over the time that I've been listening to it, trying to get an understanding of it.
You know what I'm saying?
It seems like we've been throwing money.
We're running out for money.
I don't follow it to around the amount coming together.
One idea is that it's just sometimes up the line.
We're not aware of the full extent of the cost of this impeachment in each way.
And to that in mind, I saw, in some one refresh me on the why the trip grant, we were not awarded the trip grant.
Who are you talking about?
Councillor Stroud.
There was about 16 districts in this state that were competing for it and we didn't get a win.
We got you.
So we went in in reality, we went from having, you know, hopefully having six hundred seventy-five
moustics and he popped from the gambling and then the state was going to fall.
The trip was going to pick up.
That's right.
And then, and so under 2.3, it just continues on as a down at the bottom, as a tier one priority project,
making around the amount of budget eligible for a SS4, a implementation grant.
What is that about?
Councillor Stroud.
That's a good question.
Councillor Stroud.
On the technical side, Mr. Davis, if you want to pass it on to you.
I know the SS4A is the safe streets for all, and that has to do a lot with, you know, multi-modal
and all that kind of stuff.
Yeah, Tim probably knows a lot more, but there's a...
Mr. Gibson can help us out.
Tim gives him the development of the department.
So the state's streets for all is another grant program that is out there.
The county did do basically the last study that has to go around with that.
The county did complete all their studies.
The department will just not in that grant cycle for us to apply for the SS4A grants.
I have worked with the county before.
The amount of trip grant is trying to get that through.
The intent is that we're going to go out with the SS4A grant.
If it's down there, we just don't know if that's going to get there.
But it is something we are definitely intending on going.
With that SS4A grant, half set the cost of about 2 million and 2 million.
That's correct.
It could also go into the actual construction phases in there.
Just disappointed that we'll keep getting turned down for, you know, it feels like...
No, we're important, we're important, but then we don't get any money, we're important.
And we just keep pulling out more taxpayers, keep pulling out more, and we don't have to...
PD&E back yet, so once we get those kind of out of place, but thank you.
Anyone else, would you speak for the first time?
Mr. Chairman.
I did recently speak for some representatives from the county.
They are going to be partnering.
I hope they're going to be partnering with us again to apply for this year.
The correct grant.
Correct.
We can go for it.
Mr. Get it.
Yeah, I'm...
Everything is fresh.
I...
You know, much like the county, I had a lot of this thing.
So it's just not for me, and I'm very good at what they did.
Also, it wasn't cheap, but it paid for itself in the end.
So maybe something we can look at going forward, not this year.
Essentially down the road.
And then the grant company we've been chasing, we've been all...
I thought it in T's cross now.
I just didn't think about this agenda.
So I have another...
I haven't been chasing one for us.
That's the SSS port.
That...
And other people...
Right.
And that's their business model.
They'll find them for us.
And do the paperwork.
They don't get paid until we get it.
The bill actually helped most days.
I don't think the city of Descent hired a lobbyist about nine months ago.
And this passed on a...
...let's life session in our boat session.
Actually, it was their...
...was approved.
So that's a good idea.
It was your thing.
It's not about the lobbyist.
Maybe to read this at that.
It's next year.
I think about hiring one.
Is there a pre-effect of it?
Or can the administrative executive side of the government?
I can feel Mr. Walker's eyes.
I was like, that was not it.
It was not.
But I don't like it either.
But it works.
Yeah.
And that's not good at it.
Okay.
Continue.
I do like it.
And because if there's an ROI...
I mean, if this is a very early in the phase of evaluating...
...whoever the...
...possible lobbyist can't just repeat to solicit...
...but if we can get a better ROI...
...I'm all for it.
Because we recently...
...the past few years.
And I feel that we will have plenty of time...
...to have some serious discussions regarding this issue...
...and the future.
But for now, council, please go down the motion.
And the motion does pass unanimously...
...which brings us back, I believe, to item 9.
Resolution.
9.1.
Is it correct?
I don't know if you have any questions.
I'm going to ask you about...
...is being a crazy set.
So, you may be slow down.
I don't know if we can let it go.
Oh yeah.
I don't know if you have any questions.
I'm going to go down.
All right.
He's already gone.
Item 9.1.
Resolution 2025-10.
Approving the redevelopment area plan update.
Mr. Percett.
Yes. Thank you.
Mayor Council.
So this is an item that you've probably been familiar with...
...that is, we've been through since zero-right board meeting.
We have some discussion about doing...
...fearing a line of update to our zero-right plan...
...so you discuss community policing.
So we've been using...
...and the shift obviously in the zero-right...
...the last couple of years...
...and in the review of the city attorney for the last couple of years...
...you know, we found out that there are quite a lot of people...
...like we're lacking in zero-right plan...
...although there are still some bases in background to support us.
Funding those activities out of the zero-right.
But with that, we want to make these changes...
...so that the last zero-right board meeting...
...we did provide just a draft for the language...
...and just the seat correction to move forward.
So since that time, we went through the formal notice process...
...to the county, it's actually in authorities.
We've prepared the item that you have here this evening...
...which does incorporate the...
...with intersection 2.3 of the zero-right plan...
...it adds objective 1.8...
...that basically just under the five of these different...
...creating policing initiatives...
...that we're allowed to do in the zero-right.
...in XERA, in accordance with statute.
We've made a couple of minor changes...
...to the knowledge of the page...
...as well as for the section and the conclusions...
...in the plan while we're updating it...
...which is an authentic scene at sorts...
...and outdated since we were making this call...
...of the 2025 zero-right plan update.
So with that, it is just the changes...
...which has just got the zero-right board...
...of not receiving any feedback comments.
...objections for any...
...the county is actually the reason for anything like that for it.
For that, staff does respect to recommend...
...the approval resolution of 2025-10...
...to the adoption of the 2025 zero-right plan update...
...to incorporate community policing initiatives into the plan.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Percett.
Anyone from the board with questions on this item?
For Mr. Percett.
Does anyone from the public wish to speak on this item?
Councilor Yorish to take any action on this item?
So moved to approve resolution 2025-10...
...for the adoption of the 2025 community redevelopment...
...area plan update to incorporate community policing...
...and initiatives into our current CRA plan.
Okay.
Motion made by Councilman Jeter seconded by Councilwoman DeBerry...
...to approve resolution 2025-10 additional comments.
Thank you to the CRA team...
...when it's now officially in our plan...
...and love the community policing department.
Mr. Percett.
Yes.
I have things.
What's your question?
Good question, anyone else?
Please vote.
And the motion does pass unanimously...
...which brings us to Adam 9.2 resolution 2025-11...
...a resolution approving the forwarded department of transportation...
...traffic improvements on field parkway and...
...cheap-ish.
Mayor to Council and guests...
...on August of 2022...
...to the forwarded department of transportation...
...but a study at First and View.
That study was requested...
...meas there was 35 traffic crashes at First and View...
...from 2017 to 2022.
After that, the recommendation of the time...
...was to install the player at First and View.
Unfortunately, that fruit is never been funded...
...on any F.D. work plan...
...and recently we've noticed an increase in traffic crashes...
...at that same location.
In the month of June, there were nine traffic crashes at that single location, which was 10% of all traffic
crashes within the city of Worm Beach. Year to date, there's been 18 traffic crashes at first
in the field. Any time a intersection has more than five traffic crashes, it's considered
a hazardous intersection. So we met with F. Dog a few weeks ago, and in that meeting F. Dog has
recommended to make first and meal a right terminal. So if you're coming east or west off, first
you've got the term right on to be, you could still turn left off of bele onto first, but
you could not go across bele on first until that late gets funded at the intersection. F. Dog looks
in this is a temporary solution to improve traffic safety at the intersection. F. Dog will assist
me committing and in the method of transportation during the installation of the barrier of
device, but the city would be responsible for the cost of construction, which Daniel Payne estimated
about $12,000. F. Dog wanted a formal resolution from the city council, and the funding would
come from half-since sales tax balance, and there's a resolution attached.
Thank you, Chief, questions from the council for two pages on the side?
I have a question. Yes, ma'am, strata.
Okay, we're the light that you're in here indicating a traffic light across the bele park way off first
street onto church.
What's your answer to that?
I want to make sure I'm at that. The light that we're almost to call will be the intersection
of the bele.
Fun with church.
Okay.
And the two stories.
Okay.
I don't know if this is Mr. Jeter.
This is not funding a light. This is funding a light.
This is funding a light.
This is funding a signage in the flexible barriers that are very similar to the ones that you see
currently on a carry.
Correct.
So they would just start off from the most straight across the forest.
Which is still a step and the right positive direction.
And FDOT is given us to go ahead too.
Yes, FDOT. FDOT is encouraging us to move forward with it.
They want our formal resolution to show this to you, sir.
Got it.
Mr. Variety.
Yes.
I'm very much, I'd like to have a truth.
I'm one of the offenders that cross the bele parkway from first street.
But I've watched Highway 98, very, very carefully and also the traffic coming from
Hollywood and field.
Fortunately, I haven't been hit yet.
But I look forward.
Thank you.
That's actually here.
Okay.
You know what else?
Questions?
What did you want from the public?
Would you like to speak on this side?
Yes.
In terms of if you were to take any motion on this side?
Yes.
I make a motion too.
For the 2021-11 resolution, for the FDOT,
traffic improvements on field parkway.
Second.
I have a motion made by Councilwoman DeBare.
Seconded by Councilman Jeter to approve resolution,
2025-Eweven.
Additional comments, Mr. Berry?
Yes.
Thank you for supporting this Mr. DeBare.
And I believe this will help us.
And downtown will not downtown for long.
But all the traffic is coming up on Highway 98.
And more is coming downville Parkway.
As we get more and more traffic here.
It's the dangerous dangerous area down there.
And I appreciate your support, Mr. DeBare.
And hopefully the campus will also.
Councilman DeBare.
Yes.
Thanks Jason for stepping in and getting us done in the faster.
Thinking outside the box.
Kind of way with FDOT.
Anytime we can make our road safer and save our common resources.
Valueable and precious.
Time.
Responding to that many crashes.
It's a no-brainer.
Anyone else on Council?
We should speak.
Say no.
Please vote.
Resolution does pass unanimously, which brings us to item 9.3.
Resolution 2025-12.
Resolution regarding city properties inventory for workforce housing.
Mr. Gibson.
So several years ago.
Section 1660-4514 statutes.
Which changed that basically required to every three year.
All units have to go through doing inventory all property that we own.
The total to and basically do an assessment on that to see if any of that would be appropriate for basically transfer.
We're developing into workforce housing on there.
On January 25, 2022.
The first time this will drop for the council.
They did it.
Resolution 2022-4.
Looking at the review there.
They did not have any property at that time.
It would be appropriate for workforce housing.
On June 4, for this year.
On staff did request a list of all of our property.
We went through that list again.
And we've decided to.
Staff is assessed that there's a no appropriate property for.
The use of affordable housing at that time.
That staff respect the right committee council.
The right committee council adoption.
Resolution 2-025-12.
Declaring all city owned property.
They reviewed a no property that identified appropriate for affordable housing.
Thank you, Mr. Gibbs.
Questions from council.
Mr. Gibbs.
Mr. Walker.
Just clarification words.
I guess the subject includes workforce housing language.
About the text.
I think we could use the words before.
The statement or the distinction or the use in the Medicaid.
They're pretty much in your change.
Thank you.
Anyone else?
Question.
Anyone from a public which to speak on this side?
Council, you wish to take any action.
Mayor, some who do adopt resolution of 2025-12.
To claim that all city owned property has been reviewed.
And no property has been identified appropriate for affordable or workforce housing.
Most of it by council and jitter's.
Second of all council and browning.
To approve resolution 2025-12.
Deconding that all city owned property has been reviewed and no property has been identified
for affordable housing.
Any additional comments from anyone?
Seeing none, please vote.
That passes unanimously which moves us to resolution.
Resolution 2025-13.
Resolution adopting the fiscal year.
2025-30.
CDB.
G.
Consolidated Plan.
And fiscal year 2025-26.
Any will action plan?
Once again Mr. Gibson.
Is there.
So typically on a database that will bring in the community development block grant.
CDB.G.
Annual action plan for the city council.
Is a process that starts early in the year.
We're going to question applications.
We work with the citizens and advisory council.
Kind of come up with what we think the funding should be allocated for that specific year.
Once every five years we do have to do a consolidated plan.
Much more than debt.
Part of that is a plan also began to actually plan.
So that's why this one this year is a little bit broader.
Then typically is when we come in here.
So for this one, the CDB.G.
Just for the new we do have a few new members on here.
Full of projects on there.
They must be consistent with national priorities.
And as such as activities that benefit low and moderate income people.
The prevention of elimination of a smaller life.
We're a other community development activities that address urgent health or safety issues.
We are considered to be an entitlement community.
We are required to require to prepare the five year consolidated plan and the annual action plan.
So the current.
2020-25.
It's all day planned.
The true subsidy council on September 22nd.
2020.
And for this year for the annual action plan.
We did receive 132,070 dollars.
Which is a little bit lower than we've received in the previous year.
It has seen five years of calm down a little bit every year.
But not too significantly this year.
The funding number for at least a little bit later than normal this year.
That's one of the majority of this.
So we've got a little time on this one.
But with the delays coming out of HUD on any grants that we're going to be granted this year.
We did give the information until May 14th.
When we got to work with our citizen to buy the recounts before that.
We did work very closely with the CDC on this one.
We did have a couple of extra meetings.
Or that we normally do this one.
We did receive seven applications from a variety of nonprofits in the city.
And with that one.
But we also went back during the March.
11th workshop with City Council.
Kind of went a little bit more in depth and deep into what the CDC program is.
And one of the guidance that we received from you at that time was possibly looking to do a larger project.
Rather than funding seven or eight smaller nonprofit organizations.
What we've been doing in the past few years there.
We did work.
Reach out through the other.
Divisions and departments in the city to see if anybody had ideas.
We also work very closely with our citizen advisory council on there asking them,
Hey, bring us your ideas in there.
In addition to that we did start a community need survey.
We put out there.
I didn't quite get the responses we were hoping for.
It received total 63 responses to that's need survey.
It was put out there.
Unfortunately, large number those responses weren't really from that low and moderate income.
Community that we were hoping for on there.
But even with that we did work.
I just said with the CAC and the one project that we wanted to bring before you as a possibility.
Is the development of a park.
There's two separate locations that we were looking at.
On there.
One is over the comb's manner.
And the other one is in the local types of like around part.
Modulation of all the tennis courts are right in that area.
Really kind of taking the bulk of that money rather than giving it out to those smaller individuals.
Taking the bulk of that money and really starting to invest it into development of something there.
Obviously the it would look like about 105.
That all the dollars we'd be able to put through that.
That's not going to be a massive part.
This could be phased in over the years.
We chose to kind of go down that road with these.
So tonight we've really got two options to present to you either one.
The city staff is behind with the level of the CAC.
We kind of talked through this that they would be fine with either one.
So basically we break it down with the planning and administration of this.
We get the 20% that it goes on there.
And we could even figure out if the lower that is.
Especially if we go with the one project because there's a lot less to do.
For city staff at that point in time and even invest a little bit more that money towards the park there.
Option two would basically be to break it down into the smaller organizations in there.
Now it's important to understand.
With the small breakdown that we go back route that there are.
We'll have to consider public service and public facility uses in there.
With the CDVG money that we really try to focus on facility type things, not the services because then money is just staying going.
First the investment in to the public facilities that are there.
There is a 15% cap on public services.
So if we do go with a smaller one.
There's a maximum funding of $19,00 and $10.50 that we can get back to the services.
That tends to be the large number of applications we give you every year is public service funding.
So that money is very tight and we can't really give all the money that's requested to come there.
I'm happy to go for the different options that are in the agenda pocket there if you would like.
Or if you have any questions.
But at this point staff is a requesting city council.
Option a resolution 2.025-13 to approve fiscal year 2025.
A 30 consolidate plan and a fiscal year 2025.6 CDG payment action plan.
Choosing either option one or option two.
Any circumstances?
We'll start with questions from the board with Mr. Teaver.
Yeah, raise my hand and you answered the question and it was back at that March meeting.
Thank you for listening because we did discuss doing a large project and said the small nickels and dimes we've done for years and we don't really see anything tangible.
And my question was we talked about one of the benefits being such a large administrative and planning calls going down.
So you see that maybe being adjusted a little bit.
Yes, if we were to go to option one, that could go down and get a little bit more bank for you.
We do pay for certain things out of there. We have some software that has managed to grant funds that we always have to fund out of there.
There's some education and stuff that we typically take a little bit of the money out of there.
But absolutely that if it's not managed, we do still have to manage not all money is spent in that grant year.
Typically it's a three year period. We try to get that money spent.
So we are still managing some of the last year grants. So there will still be some planning stuff in there.
But it would not be the significant amount that it would be if we went like an option to it would be much less stacked on to do that.
So from a community perspective and a staff perspective it's more paying for your butt for option one.
Should we go with option one, I see or do you want a specific park listed in the motion.
We can have to do that.
Or I mean really for the fund that goes forward. We have to give this a minute ahead on to the end of the week.
And it would really just kind of be for a park development kind of stuff.
We could kind of find tune that later on.
We did do back in March.
If you remember we talked about doing the larger ones.
It would have to be at least 50% of that community would be low to moderate income.
I did run the numbers on that one already for the comb's matter area.
95.7% of that area is considered low to moderate income.
And for the high to area of 56.8% is considered low to moderate income.
So you don't want a low to area.
I would call all five for that money.
Got it.
Anyone else?
Questions?
Just to confirm that oakwood hides playground.
That's right there off a halt by the tennis center.
Get that's right.
That's coffee with the tennis center.
There was a small playground there.
That's right.
The lapinating clubs.
The same one.
The idea is to just kind of renovate that.
It would create.
Yeah.
I'll play out.
I'll like that one.
That wall is.
It's in the same basketball room that had been there for a while.
Yeah.
Or that course.
Good stuff.
I just want to clarify where that was.
The quick question for you as well for the rest.
The park that you've mentioned, the comb's manner of playground.
That currently doesn't exist at all.
That's correct.
So at the end of the comb's manner, there's some city owned property.
There's a little station on there.
We worked with Mr.
On that one, he would be comfortable. We have to do some vinsing and stuff obviously in there. But it's a large area on there that we believe we could still let public works have their access to lip stations, don't that they have to go back there for maintenance on and still develop a portion of that area into a parking combination.
And then so the $105,000 that's budgeted in option one, I know you said, making the parking phases, what type of, as to steal a phrase from councilman jitter, banged for the buck for $105,000, would we get out of, like, hang there can't just bulldoze a bunch of stuff and clear whatever and then just leave ground under for a year until we come back next year.
So how about that?
That area is actually pretty clear already. I did work a little bit from this corporate before trying to get some estimates on kind of stuff.
We didn't really get anything there down on what really that money could do.
I think the best thing I don't know that, and I think what we do is try to have some community meetings out there.
Whichever one we're going to do, just try to get what do we want to mean, is this for lower kids, this for women, you know, middle-aged kids.
You kind of order their target on, audience out there, if that kind of stuff, and then really kind of get that kind of stuff.
Again, we're going to have a budget on it, it's not going to be a whole lot that we can do this year, but then just kind of figure out what can we do that's going to get something out there, and then maybe go long and over here.
That's awesome.
I just wanted to say thank you so much for including both of those parts in here.
And I'm trying not to be able to go a little biased on that, but I can certainly speak on the cones, the cones, the mammary area, because I grew up here.
And I wanted to, you know, I thank you so much for including them because I've always felt like we used to have a park.
We used to have a park off of a lot of your road, and years ago we were promised they were going to, you know, redo the park and give us a park.
There was no park here, once they took the park away from us, and metric system kind of came in and set up shop there, and you bought the land and built there, you know, industrial business of whatever stuff.
At the end of the cones, man, what I do now, for me, that would be something really, really special to know that there was a park or somewhere for kids to come out and play in, because,
I know I used to play of that, don't have to, to the creek or a pond or whatever you call it, and, you know, and probably at the time, I didn't know I'm scared, so, you know, it was probably pretty dangerous.
I used to get in trouble a lot of times from just going out and we stick down there and play, but then the day I know exactly where you're talking about it is, it's not such a large area, and essentially, it probably wouldn't cost as much to put something there, but it wouldn't be my heartfelt desire to see something there.
You know, because I know the open high, so every, you know, growing up there, it's always going to park in place after you get by high school, where, and, you know, looking on a metric, it was, you know, it was always somewhere for you to be able to, you know, on the play or the kids, something for the youth, and for me, it would be, you know, just a pressure to know that there's something down at the end of cones, because it is just sitting there and the city is using up my area.
And I just wanted to comment on it again, thank you so much for sitting both of those areas.
Mr. Robert, here's the question.
Thank you.
I guess it would be possible to do a combination of one and two options, one and two.
Absolutely.
The reason I asked is, I was listening to you say, and you mentioned it being an older year process, you know, we're going to collect some money, designates and money this year, and then kind of in my mind is seeing that out of work.
I kind of pocketed it for the next year, the next year until we get, you know, community meetings and what's going to go there.
I'll be a slip, it's a sweet set, it's one thing, but if it's covered, pick of all courts, it's another thing.
But, you know, just that money, it's not going to go.
And then, and so I was looking down there at option two, and some of those, and, you know, I'm going to show my bias a little bit, because I'm going to let you in a few of them.
You know, to think that we might be taking both tangible, you know, a park, and taking away from the Ridgeway Center Boys and Girls Club mental health association.
That's, you know, disappointing to me, I know they're valuable assets in the community, they provide great services.
So, you know, I have a problem, personally, not at least offering up the idea of splitting this money between some, but we might have to parse down some of those.
And option two, down there, which, while I'm on it, we have new sets of statements, so we're a lot of them.
It doesn't have a name, is it a project or is it a...
So, a lot of times we use that project.
So, what we can do is we can aim on law, if I hand a digital home version.
And they call it, and they have a new set, like a new set that they have in the case.
On the co-case, I get to the city, typically for, like, groups, you know, you see some of those type of groups out there.
So, we can use that money to basically put new groups on, on the low-to-moderating, come homes out of there.
We usually kind of try to throw some money in there, because they're, like I said, with that public services cap on there.
We can only look so much to that.
And then, honestly, with this, like, this year, here, the only public facility application we've received in, or for mental health association, one more place.
And that's it.
So, that must have to go into facilities for some sort.
So, kind of the news that the bacon one is one that we in the city, we can manage.
While still meeting the HUD requirements to have certain amounts of that going into the public facilities column.
Thank you, Bob, chance of twirling.
Do you buy notes, chance?
No, how much money has been used from that phone over the last three to five years towards those of bacon processes?
How about that?
Don't hold me through that.
I think it's probably around 60 pounds.
Hold me.
Um, do you know the past?
Okay.
Carfish.
Carfish, mate.
You might not have the exact GIS distance.
But how far is the county park away from the proposed comms manner park?
That don't get it.
Okay, rough estimate.
Half a month.
Half a second.
Okay.
Well, that's all right.
Thanks.
Hello.
What is the, uh, the, uh, the, uh, the rehab nuisance of bacon, uh, Council Barbara's talking about.
The, what is the, that's the, that's the public service.
What is that cap of the, of the funds we get that can be used on that?
Did you say it already?
So, any of the money to be clicked into the public facilities?
I'm out.
You're ready for it.
Like, if we went to a function, you want all of that money to go into the development of a park at the public facility.
I mean, the only one that have caps on there is the 20% tax for planning an administration and a 15% cap for the public services.
So, really the rehab nuisance of bacon and all that kind of stuff doesn't have a cap either.
Or you can spend that all the money on that.
Okay.
Yeah.
There's some questions.
Mr. Gibson.
Seeing that, I learned from the public, which to speak on this.
Yes, sir.
I got a question.
I'd like to know.
If you could please come up with the 30 months on that.
We have that for now.
Yes.
I don't know.
The public question is, what constitutes a park as per real?
Because public rates level on the office circle.
The basketball court.
That's all we refer to as the basketball court.
It's never meant seen in our hands as a park.
And then you asked about the park in surveying heights.
The one behind comes an opportunity to place some shirt.
That in the opportunity place, you know, we're dealing with foster kids there.
And we got the little kids in the neighborhood.
I, too, embies, I've worked in that area.
I look close to that area.
But I think it didn't need something down on the other hand as well.
Because it gets overcrowded.
And when you start mixing too many adults, the children.
And the park that you spoke of behind up to any place is mostly for the children or the young kids in the community.
But the bigger kids, the older kids of high school kids,
they need a place to go and be able to go play ball.
And not take the park away from the little kids out there.
And surveying heights here.
That's all I know.
Thank you, sir.
Yes, ma'am.
Please come up and state your name and address.
Hi, have a junior bar. Can you hear me?
Yes, ma'am.
I'm from the Mental Health Association.
I'm one of the one of those nickel and dime organizations that depends heavily on whatever kind of funding you can help us with.
The Mental Health Association has been around for 68 years.
The building we're in is probably older than 60.
We don't charge for anything that we do.
We throw about 30 or 40,000 dollars a year into this community.
Find psychiatric medications for people who don't have the money to stay well.
To buy therapy for children.
And we don't have a problem in the world about a park, about a larger project.
But our dollars will give to programs and services.
There are not so much interested in buying us a repair of art to bathrooms.
We are the community parking lot over on Kenwood subdivision.
Everybody parks there.
We get a lot of people in and out of there.
We do a lot of community meetings there.
Everything we do is free.
We're asking for $16,000 dollars to get the lemonade out of the walls that are breaking in the back of the MHA.
To put in 88 compliant bathrooms, toilets, sinks, grab bars.
We don't have those.
You've helped us before.
And when you say, you don't get to see a lot of that.
You're not around for the day when you've helped us with our roof.
Just as the monsoon began in our town.
And it started leaking through, but we had the money from you to be able to get it fixed.
It was a crisis.
Please help us.
We help our community.
Please help us if you can find the middle road between the park.
The park.
And the community.
And the non-profits.
If there's a way to do that, to do both,
our baby can take a little bit.
Thank you so much.
Thank you, ma'am.
And thank you for what you do in the community.
Mr. Gray.
I have a very great 2017 morning Avenue.
I just want to respond to that.
That was a part study done on data statistics.
To a part 40-bit jet drive.
It's done by University of West Lower Florida.
If you read that study, as each council in the read that study,
it changed you.
If you do a part in the city or football.
What neighborhood was the pride from a park.
It says, the cones community.
It says, the nearest park within Maryester.
And it says, if it seems to be one of the park,
the best place to put a park would be in an area.
I think the staff, a copy of a city map,
a park.
The only place that wasn't a park in was the cones community.
So I sent them a city to the G board.
So when we make those decisions, it was made on statistics and stats.
We had a park when I grew up in luxury.
It was a metric building.
Every shutdown in 1977.
We was told we were going to get a new park.
It's 2,25.
That park hasn't came yet.
So that was a week.
So we don't just sit down and say, okay, we're going to put money here.
We sit down and do the study.
Talk to people.
Look at the sort of situation.
So we basically put a lot in another city.
We see the people.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir.
Mr. Graham said this every year, but thank you for everything
that you've done in bringing this money to our community.
So that we happen to see this tonight.
Anyone else from the public which just speak on this side?
See none.
Do we have a motion from yesterday?
I moved to a dot resolution.
20 about 13 to a proof.
This will year 25 to 30 consolidate.
Plain in the fiscal year 2526.
CDBG annual action plan.
To choose option one as recommended by the citizens advisory committee.
So.
The motion made by Councilman Geter and the second by Councilman
Schmidt to approve resolution.
20 25 dash 13.
And select option one.
Councilman Geter.
I know we're trying to make this quick.
We got another meeting.
I could elaborate forever on this.
We've set year for multiple years in the past.
And.
While I certainly support mental health and I support a lot of the.
Programs listed down here that I just we've set here.
Many of the years pass with this.
And quote unquote.
Nick one down the bank for the book.
I'll keep using this since I started it.
But.
So sometimes at the end of the year.
These programs didn't even use all of that money.
We're wasting a lot of staff time going back and figure out.
Well, they didn't use that.
How much did they use?
We got to do this.
So that's for the nickel and dime phrase comes in.
The second thing is you get more bang for your book.
Going to do one project.
I'll let Councilmember Schmidt and Councilwoman rally.
Decide on open heights or comes later.
Decide to go.
But I know either one of those.
Ultimately a park in the community like Mr. Gray said.
We'll also somehow in the long run can contribute to mental health as well.
Because the kid growing up playing on a playground.
It's just a great thing.
I don't get all the reasons why I think what.
And I was going to go with an option three in mix.
Because I also like the nuisance and embankment that Councilwoman Walker said.
Because we have seen those be really great projects.
So what I'd like to see going forward is large ticket items.
Evap option one should pass and maybe it's a park this year.
But next year or in many years to come when I'm not up here on this board.
And you guys are my experiences.
Put it all towards rehab nuisance and embankment.
All hundred thousand dollars.
You'll fix up five houses.
Put it all towards a park.
You'll get a nice park when you break it down too many ways.
You can kind of spin your wheels.
I could keep going for that's my input.
Thank you sir.
Councilman Schmidt.
Yeah.
It's kind of piggyback off of what he was saying.
You know each year that option two list gets longer longer.
You know the asker didn't.
They're out there.
And like when he was saying to minister who's used the funds.
You haven't used the funds.
You haven't used all the funds.
It makes it really tough to not only administer.
But also where do you draw the line?
So we encourage like Mr. Gibson said.
We encourage staff to workshop to bring us back some of the larger projects that can make
Also an impact.
So it's tough sometimes because you're in a position.
You have to pick between a playground and mental health.
You know.
But that's what we're here and obligated to do. I'd lean more towards, especially after here at Mr.
CDC, you talk about the distance between where the county park is in the city park. I'm leaning towards
Cones Manor playground, and I'd like to go for that round. With another motion with more just
option one, the Cones Manor or but hopefully a few other people on council will also lean towards Cones Manor,
so we can give some staff direction on what to do with that 105,000 Cones.
There's that place, thank you.
Council on Walker. I may make a substitute motion. Just to see those other organizations down there do with
that one. What I'm having trouble recognizing is while I know it's CDPG funding. With we've got a
former, I think it was last estimated that close to eight million dollar park expansion over at the
Rec Center with cover pickleball. Towards and I know that's somewhere out there in the ether net.
Why couldn't our regular funding that we've used for part expansion at the Rec Center? This now
I'm not going to be covered. Why can't that? I mean that coming. I know it's crazy to say, but
132,000 dollars compared to an eight million dollar expansion over the existing Rec Center.
Let's fund Cones Manor Oakland Heights with the money that we save there and then come down
option two and it's been our money down there with those deserving organizations in the community.
I love parks. I love athletics, but I just think the money's there outside of CDPG funding that we
can do both. Just as a point of verification and I would add that I do love sports and I do
know you've always to your time to be a part of the boards. I know community that the deal with
you've sports, but just as a point of clarification, that project, the expansion of the park, what was the
bid, and what was the price that we put out? I don't know. 6 million, but it's out of the difference.
I just wanted to clarify that it wasn't eight million dollars and we did remove the cover
and pick up all the courses that were out there. Just for clarification of the public,
it was maybe never that project before. I'm sorry, the park is concerned. Let me take
jet park that's located on a jet drive and homes was a sad, sad, sad, sad, sick of a
fairs in the right for us came on council here. I set my neck out and I picked for a bathroom,
for a bathroom. It was 125,000 dollars. We had to spend with that bathroom. We didn't have the infrastructure.
We didn't have electricity, the water, the sewer, nothing. And it was fun. That park was sad.
I watched it go by later and it's beautiful. People take pride. We have people, pick up all the courses
and I'm down there all the time. We have a lot of people from all over. We're not just all
walking. We've reached residents, but people from all over, even deaths, Mary-Eister, Navar,
the county. I know, I can't we do this. We have impact 100, also, that offers 100,000 dollars. We have to apply for
this park. I'm just going to do it. Well, I know, that's why I'm referring to you. So please apply
for it again and again and again and again and again. But I'm getting it. I vote for homes park.
It's a concern. Yeah. Oh, it comes manner and everything. You need that. It will bring even though
we're not feeding everybody what. But just having a beautiful park and get out there,
hey, we're over there. This is what you need to do. That's a really own blowers and get the sand off there.
You know, you can do that. You know, how can you get it? Or get you right over there to help us out.
This is why I ask your people to do also over in the homes manner. Work together. It'll bring
yourself. And I'm off for that. Thank you, Mary-Eister. Thank you, Mary-Eister.
Thank you, Mary-Eister. Thank you, Mary-Eister. Yeah. Hi. I'm torn. A lot of these resolution. A lot of things go
centered. It's easy. Just one kind of thing. It's deserving. But I'm going to agree with Mr. Walker here a little bit more.
Because my concern, I'd love to see a park. I don't think that we should stop, but
when we talked about the hassle of sales tax, we talked about how to set our recurring. There's other sources
that we could go to that. And it's very understanding that this, that this morning,
it's been penned on this so much more. And maybe don't have as many resources or many other
alternatives to find that. So even a substitute person that started something with the parks and
a lot of the money, and as we came behind, I would like to see something like that to get it finished.
I also don't want to say a park started. If we think we can build a park for 105,000,
then I would be all about it. But I think we would, a lot of somebody, I think we would take time.
I think we'd have to come back to some other behind that anyways. And I would just take to see some of these,
that depends so much on this, get over the water. So a substitute person or a motion after this,
that that saw a better option would be there for me. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, or anyone else for the first time.
Mr. Judy. I was going to say that a question for Tiffany. I know we just put it in a Peter's park over there
and read it a bunch of equipment for like 50, 60,000. The lands already there are just going to say,
I think we can do a nice park for that amount of money. I just want to go on a record,
regardless of how the boat goes and say that Councilman Walker earlier said that he is willing to spend two
to three times a amount of money. And I just love to hear that. The Councilman Walker is going to spend money on parks.
I just love to, regardless of how the boat goes. That's not sure. Please name it. Someone right there.
Please name it. Please make sure that is in the minutes of the next step. Mr. David.
I'll just point for consider. Point for consideration, sorry.
Previously, we were able to eliminate some of these smaller one, the oversight issue, but to their
eligible for all kinds of other grants that can chase. And we've got to put that one that just can be
came a support process for that. Another concern I do have is I feel like I don't have
the data right now. I had a time to evaluate the park's operation. So if I'm adding another
part, I don't have the demand power. I already have the demand. I'm a little concerned there that we're
going to put in our soul in the deeper hole. I just had enough time to evaluate it. It's just a thought.
Thank you, Sarah. Anyone else from Council for a second time? Mr. Gator, please.
Just a clear by that. I told the agreed what you're saying, but regardless of what park
of this violence, it left an option. One, maybe it comes, mayors next year. But maybe this year,
Oakland Heights, there's already a park there. And this money goes into a large improvement to an existing
park that's already there. We're already maintaining it, but that has a lot of light in a community.
I'm good with any pickup that I just want to do. And we've got that option. The one is the motion for staff to
decide how we can mess with that. Mr. Berth, what do you think about some clarification on this motion?
Because if it does pass, it is open to interpretation of staff to decide whether or not
in the Oakland Heights park is revitalized with $15,000 or if a new park is planned or
any number of things for comes manner. I think that this motion kind of weaves a lot of ambiguity in that
If you're laying the worst kind of manners, then you need to make a substitute motion if they
have that part of it. Yes, please. Okay. And so that's a substitute motion that would be
both at all parts for the original motion. Okay. So does anyone wish to make that substitute motion?
I'll clarify that again for me. We would need a substitute motion just to clarify which of these
parts, if this were to pass, Mr. Gears' motion, whether it would be the comes manner, playground park
or the Oakland Heights playground park revitalization. And so the substitute motion would be your
pretty often one, but you want tends manner to be the part that's fun. That's what you make it motion.
I'll stick it down. I'll stick it down. That issue is made of motion. I'm making a motion.
Okay. So we have a motion from Mr. Berth, we have a second on that motion.
I'll second it. All right. I'll just stand there. Yes, Mr. Gears. So we have a motion from Mr. Berth,
second and by Ms. Riley, two designated option ones money, the $105,000 to $656 to go toward a
comes manner of playground slash park. Great. So I think we have plenty to talk about this. So if you
guys can vote now on the substitute motion. Remember, this is if this motion is to pass,
this is where the money would get. That does pass five to two. Okay. So now we'll have a vote on
Councilman Gears. That's the motion. So all the money's going to the comes manner. Well,
don't we still need to have a vote on Councilman Gears original motion? No, that's not an agent.
Never write, Steve. Well, I don't think they would have a meeting. Just to clarify, Mr. Bernds,
that a amendment to my motion would have required a vote on both. Correct. Correct. Okay.
I would also like to just briefly add that I think this is something that's
and Mr. Bernds, that you made that substitute motion. And Ms. Riley, I'm glad that you
seconded that motion. Councilman Schneider, I'm happy and hard enough to hear you words. I certainly
would have read strongly with Mr. Walker and Mr. Merrill as well, that programs like Mental Health
and whatever the city can do to help not on the fund those, but facilitate grants from other
organizations is something that I would really like to see the continuation of. But I think it is
a long overdue. As Mr. Gray said, 1977 was when that park was removed from that community
and what Councilman Gears had touched on very briefly as well and I know he's very passionate about it.
It's just getting kids outside, getting kids out of the house, getting teenagers out of the house,
having a place for teenagers to go and hanging out. That doesn't mean that everything that goes on
to the park is going to be great. We've got a lot of parks in our cities. Sometimes there's disagreements.
Sometimes there's stuff that goes on in parks that you wouldn't necessarily want. That's going
to happen in any park, anywhere in our country. But every community should have its own park for its
young people and middle-aged people, and how are new people where they can go, let off some skiing,
get some exercise, get some fresh air, vitamin D, et cetera. So I really hope that this is the beginning
of the process and designating that money to the comes-manor park. But I think that there's a lot more
work to be done there, and I'm hopeful that this Council is willing to kind of see someone
that through and maybe with the advice of Mr. Walker and some of the savings that we could realize on
other projects, dumping into that. So just wanted to add that statement since I'm going to say much
or vote on anything. Mr. Mayor, to make sure, because, you know, I'm not going to be sorry about this,
but I just want to make sure that I probably missed an opportunity there. We have, I look,
it'll come up in a later discussion. Our priorities, please safety,
bankruptcy, and the parking wreck expansion. So in my mind tonight was one opportunity that we have
to fund those category two entities, or as parks and wrecks, we fund it all the time. It's a priority.
But it required CBDG funding in order to give a special parking, we could fund it both of them theoretically
with the money that we spend in parking wreck expansion, but these people down there, again,
in group two, they only get the companies one time. They're not a part of the group and let me think
how if I could promise that. I mean, we had parks, and it comes to parks, it's here, we had the chamber,
it was here, they got 20,000. We got several of those people, they got 20,000. And then these people,
they do bring boys and girls into the mix and youth and mental health and stuff. And I just
felt terrible that we could have funded those parks with our commitment to expanding parks and wrecks.
And we've left the group in the category two of them. So I'm saddened by that. Thank you.
Thank you for certainly understanding and I appreciate where I come from. Let's move on to Item 9.5.
Resolution 2025-14. Resolution adopt in the citizen, participate, patient, point in for the community,
development, block grant, once again Mr. Gibson. I figured I thought probably about what you're
getting used to the CBBG, don't want to. So the citizen participation plan is essentially what outlines
how we're going to process and how our CBB process around the year. Our existing plan will be written
over 17 years ago. It has been one thing, since I've been with the city, I wanted to update the
chain because it's vague. It represents a public meaning or it's a public hearing. There's a lot of room for
interpretation in there, as far as applications have reached a lot of stuff like that. This is something
that we've really took. I started really diving into the last year. 24 CFR 91.1.5 actually outlined
all requirements for the citizen participation plan in there. We did go through there. We weren't
meeting the letter the law for the CFR, but we really did try to clarify that just to make sure
that we're actually hitting everything that's in there. It made it a lot easier to read. We added a
definition section in there just to make it a lot more understood. There was also just a few other
things in there by term limits for our citizen participation. I'm sorry, citizen advisory council.
There was on there, they basically, they felt the point, and then they were point their replacements
through both of them. There was term limits on there, even though we got some very dedicated people that
had been doing this for years and years, and they want to continue. So really we kind of took what
reality was and made the documentation match that while still meeting the intent of CFR. We did present this
plan for this.
The citizens are by three council on April 22nd, 2025. They have a few comments and stuff. We did take those back made those changes and brought it back to them on July 2nd of this year, where they made the motion to recommend approval from city council.
And with that staff respect, we recommend adoption of 2025 to 14 adopting the citizens participation plan for the community development block grant.
The question is on this for Mr. Gibson.
Anyone from the public like to speak on this side?
Council, we wish to take any action.
Moving to adopt residents from May 14 to adopt the citizen participation.
I'll sit this in for a kiss of patient plan for the CDBG grant program.
Thank you.
Motion made by Council.
Thank you.
Thank you to the citizens that are involved. They've always been listening for last year.
That's how we got to this point.
So, thank you.
Council, please vote.
And that motion does pass unanimously.
That brings us to ordinances on first reading.
Item 10.1, ordinance 287, committee.
The CEO of section 9.06.
Wow.
And then the usual.
Mr. Burns.
Ordinance.
Number 2187.
And the state council.
It's the one for the repealing our placing.
And this entire code ordinances.
Chapter 9.06.
First reading.
Chief Bay.
Present.
On that.
But staff.
And Debbie.
Questions.
Chief.
Thanks.
Thank you.
Council.
The existing noise orders was passed on August 10, 2021.
It's effectively possible in the force and requires a 40 hour course and a calorie of
decimometer.
Noise orders is requiring extensive training or decimal meters.
I've shown to be very difficult.
In force, these attorneys often impeach the training and methodology behind them.
Many jurisdictions have moved to a plainly audible standard, which is what we're going
to present to you tonight.
On June 24, 2025, the City Attorney drafted an ordinance for your review.
It's meant for feedback and comment.
The existing ordinance that I'm not going to go over would replace our current noise ordinance.
To rise some highlights in the new ordinance.
The downtown entertainment district would be exactly the noise ordinance between
9 a.m. and 2 a.m.
The CRA area would be exempt from 9 to midnight.
Live music or alcohol, the license to be sold would be exempt from 10 a.m. to midnight.
The military operations and activities would be exempt from the ordinance.
Construction.
Noise would be exempt between 6 a.m.
and 10 p.m.
Druid a week and 8 a.m.
to 8 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday with no construction noise on observed federal holidays.
Outside noise events would be allowed between 6 a.m.
and 10 p.m.
On the 4th of July, the summer 31st in January 1st.
Firework sounds would be allowed.
Organized athletics would be allowed between 8 a.m.
and 10 p.m. if they created noise.
Lane skipping along means activities would be allowed between 6 a.m.
and 10 p.m.
and again on 8 a.m.
to 8 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays.
Come on enforcement activities would receive medical
technicians and firefighters.
Noise will also be exempt.
City sponsor events would be exempt.
And any event that had a permit issued by the city manager
would also be exempt from this.
Vehicles operating and causing noise are covered under state
statute 316 293.
Vestals and boats which do not have modified exhaust systems
would also be exempt for this.
And any alarm would definitely offer less than 15 minutes
would be exempt in a burglary alarm
off for longer than 15 minutes.
Could be cited for them usual allowed noise.
The enforcement behind this would be a cleanly
carable standard from 50 feet from either the 50 feet
from the property line.
So I'm also just out there here.
I've been always planning on about from 50 feet from the
property line.
The first event would be a week morning.
The second event would be a 100 out of fine.
The third event would be a 250 out of fine.
And if you were to get to a fourth event.
It would be a misdemeanor with the possibly a 500 out of fine.
Any violations occurred after 15 minutes
would be treated as a second violation.
And they are actually under over three portions or months.
Thank you Chief Fish.
Questions on this noise coordinate for Chief Fish.
Mr. Walker.
Just there on that last quarter is reading it.
So a lot of our properties have smaller setbacks than 50 feet.
So there's a house that may be an election noise that's coming.
And so the officer shows up and we'll determine where the property line is.
And it's 50 feet away from it.
Is it from the front, the side or the back.
It probably won't even be really access to your windows.
It would be sold property line.
So that's where you.
50 feet from there.
From the property line.
So you'd be over in.
Potentially the neighbors yard on the far side of the neighbors yard.
You know what we think about coming and standing on the property line going out here.
And so I don't know.
It's 50 feet that way you've got to go.
Not on the property line.
You've got to hear it there.
And I was reading here that just.
The officer doesn't have to make out the audible.
I can't tell you what the sentence is.
But I heard someone speak and so therefore it's a.
It's playing the audible.
But we also used to work when measured from the.
Of 50 feet or more.
So measured 50 feet.
Not.
The sound is not measured.
So just out of curiosity from.
Law enforcement.
I mean, are you recording it.
I mean, what is.
Obviously, if you go out there and there.
None.
One of the officers out there and they're standing over there.
And now I can hear it.
Is.
Does there.
Can we hear this well?
Or is it just.
It's hard to get is or hard to get.
It's an.
I'm just like anything awesome for some.
It's generally the.
Foster's testimony with the totality of evidence.
It's gathered.
So the body war can where could be additional evidence is used in the case.
Not every sound is always captured on the body.
Or it can't.
Or these might.
Some look directional.
So if there is capture them.
Body.
Can't really.
It's written case.
Pain from a special.
years hearing you cut the hammer, the patterns for the police officers, the best
situation.
Well, that video hammer began in the West to be positive each officer, but
we've been facing that product as a sports director.
I could see that definitely supporting the, you know, I can only imagine how tricky it
is.
And there will be some tricks here with this obviously, is there going to be a
mark on the soil where I was standing, because what you're saying whether they're
practically far coming towards the other ones, but obviously, I mean, they're marking
their spot 50 feet away, where they're 40 or 40 feet away, or they're 50, too.
How do I mean, there's got to be some training coming up on that, right?
So there's different ways we can measure the distance, one way to measure the distance
will be property lines that we spoke about, so if you know a house has an 84 or 100 foot,
a lot of property lines from the property operations website, you can just go to that one
adjacent property and you know you greater than a hundred foot away from the place.
You also get the right way, the right way, the right way, the right way is your gently.
Thirty-fold long, so thirty-fold lines, you can also measure the right way in the figure out
the other twenty feet are.
If you need somebody that is a speed enforcement officer and they have to track a enforcement
laser, the laser will also probably have distances and you can get down to the fraction and
the means for the traffic laser.
But the easiest way, probably really, the property operations website seems a lot
size is, but the name is lot, and it would be greater than a fifty-fold.
So if you're a needy-fold-wide, a hundred-fold-wide, a two-and-a-foot-guard, you could
document that they used to get the property line from you just in property, which is two-and-a-foot
in the property line of the noise and meeting property, and if you're playing the ear from
two-and-a-be, then you will access the 50 feet.
The same thing in all three of the property lines that you need to get down to.
Well, I wish you much luck with it, and I think it's going to be the next game of cat and
house, with you facing challenges about that, so I know we all have a good attempt.
You know, keeping things quiet in the community for we can, so a good opportunity to
accomplish this whole mess below there.
Thank you.
Councilman Guterier.
I think almost every ordinance in all you guys have to enforce is ultimately a game of cat and
house, and it took out the evidence and all that kind of stuff.
So I want to rely on this because we've been here, and we've heard a lot of complaints from
that podium about noise, whether it's a specific property or specific individual.
We've heard this for years.
We've tried to combat this and run this pay off of other things we're going to do.
So I'm going to do my best to rely on Council, and I know that Mr. Burns has done his homework,
and gathered all the options from surrounding communities that have enforceable ordinances
on this.
And you've taken that and said, this works, we're going to use it, but we currently have doesn't
or is that correct?
That's correct.
You've done your homework.
I'm going to count on you to say this is a lot more enforceable than the previous game
of cat and house.
We have the decimal meter, right?
And it goes back to everything else we've done and we say it every time.
This may not be perfect yet, but if this is better than what we had, correct?
Correct.
So it's like, okay, now this is an elephant versus a rat.
This is a lot easier.
Based on the trust I have in you too, I appreciate your work and bringing us forward.
Thank you.
You know, the questions on this are cheap, but I just noticed something here on that cat.
I don't know what it means, but what it's working.
You know, I'm envisioning a car sitting out in front of a home and it's boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
It's out of the car.
That's out on the street and then it references the source property line.
So the person is this.
So something on the right away is coming on a state statute.
So I'll be about the state statute through 16 points.
So the people causing noise on the public right away would be coming under the state statute.
The state statute talks about 25 feet from the source.
So you measure 25 feet from the vehicle.
And if you can hear the noise from where the 25 feet from the vehicle,
the state would assume that it was in violation of state statute.
The next state statute should not click a ball from bottom to bottom for these other.
The state statute should also be used.
So if you want to cover anything besides the vehicle, that's what the state law is saying.
Thank you.
Anyone else with questions on this or chief page?
I do know that there was one council member who did race and started off on item.
And I think it was council member.
Did you want to?
Yes, sir.
Oh, again, this is not a question.
It's more of a statement.
I appreciate that council member Browner.
I sincerely do.
Anyone else from the public wish to speak on this item?
Yes, ma'am.
Please welcome to 2021 each week.
I really appreciate this.
I think it's for our purposes.
It's going to be much easier tonight.
I believe in force.
And we greatly appreciate all of it that you've done.
But one more caveat.
Just to reconsider, please,
making the morning out back to 7 a.m.
to 6 a.m.
6 a.m.
is on point of view.
Just say.
But thank you.
Thank you, Ms. Courtney, and please do you share the results of this with the
our neighbors and friends over there at the beach making community?
And I do agree that 6 a.m.
is our perfect way.
Just stay in period in line.
Anyone else from the public wish to speak?
Do we have a motion from council on this item?
Please let us know your comments.
Second, the motion made by councilman Schmidt.
Seconded by councilman Gdeter to approve this ordinance.
2187, a mending section 9.06 for loud,
and there's one around on cue.
About an unusual moment.
Additional comments?
I just want to thank you as a representation of the beach view.
You know, it's been a very long process.
And then you mentioned earlier on in the evening.
and the evening about SB 180, which is a whole
other statutory state think it is really taking home rule
away from us to be able to best manage, not only our city,
but in these kind of things where, so thank you for
continued advocate.
And like my her said, not everybody is going to be watching this
from Beachview, and we got a lot of good comments from them
throughout this process, and not so good comments.
So please encourage them that we're listening, we're taking action,
but unfortunately, the action doesn't always go as quick as
what we all would like it.
So thank you for seeing this through, and that's why I've made the motion.
Thank you, Councillor.
Anyone else, Mr. Jeter?
Which is me?
Well said, Mr.
All right.
Councillor McBrowning.
I'd like to end the motion.
Okay.
I'm going to approve staff recommendation,
the dischange exemption one from 2 a.m. to
11.59 p.m., and I just think it's a bit excessive.
People live down there, and I know people have mentioned,
you know, knowing what you get into, and you move down
town, or whatever foot, and you know, it was built,
think of five or six, and how many of these bars and stuff
were down there back then, so they really know
what they were getting into, you know, I don't know, but um,
I think it levels it all out with the CRA as well, so
we have amendment to the-
Motion to be on the second to that amendment. Second, sir discussion. Okay. Councilman Juter is seconded. I do believe, Mr. Brown, I kind of explained, but if you'd like to expand on how that also.
You said that puts it in line with the current CRA district. So you're basically mirroring the downtown overlay district with the CRA district.
So, so from 9 a.m. to 11.5, but they community redevelopment of this district. So exemption to.
All right. I think Mr. Burns was the process of, is there first and second reading? We'll get the second reading coming up.
This would, if you'd tell the improvements for logins, or surprise, amendment, this would take back the minute, first reading, this would be a more restricted, if you'd like.
But if we'd like to, for goodbye, I'm making it say three a.m., that you can get it the second reading, making that change.
But because I could get it more rise, basically, if we take it right away, remember the public comment, the voice, then you should go back to first reading.
So that this would come back to this change, at first reading, at the second home. So he wouldn't be able to make that change between now, between this first reading and getting approved in the second reading, which is kind of start over getting.
Yeah, just sure, well, I want to all match.
It's just like, Council Mitch, we want to make everybody happy, but at the same time, I think you've been here for the last two or three years, so this is the position I'm in right now.
The keep, and Council Mitch Smith, who is up here all the time, we say all the time, do we keep kicking the cane?
They say, well, it's not perfect, let's wait. We're back in the same boat six months later, trying to get the times correct.
So, let's have a question for you real quick, chief, big, as well.
If this amendment were to take hold, businesses that are not necessarily downtown near Indiana, but businesses that are in that district.
For example, the block.
Now, as the block, going to be cited by police for Norse ordinances, 1159.
I mean, it depends if their sound would be playing the audible for more than 50 feet from a proper letter.
Well, it's insulated, it would not matter, but yes, they could hear it.
I was going to bring up for a reference. The current noise ordinance allows Friday and Saturday until 2 a.m. in the downtown business district.
And then during the week, it is midnight in the downtown business district, just for a point of reference.
And so that's what is right now.
Correct right now on a Friday or Saturday night, you could have noise in the downtown business district till 2 a.m.
Okay.
And so the new ordinance kept that same.
It pretty much orders it keeps it till 2 a.m.
And that's.
It's every day.
Who are the new?
We're going to say that.
And so your amendment, Mr. Browning, is just a change.
That 2 a.m.
To 1159.
Seven days or five days.
I mean, it's written a seven days.
I mean, we can dice it up if we want.
Okay.
But your amendment is to make it match what's currently there, which would be.
If actually if your amendment is to make it 1159,
Monday, Friday and 2 a.m.
weekends, then that would not be making more stricted on anybody.
That's what I was doing.
All right.
Perfect.
Any time back to the second week, that changed.
That's the first time.
Sunday to Thursday.
Friday's Saturday is going to be.
Yep.
I mean, I haven't visited them.
And I don't know where we've been closed.
Between 10 and 9 on the weekdays.
Anyways.
I would like to last for sure too because I think you as a business you want to.
Be a good neighbor.
Play it out.
You want to be a good student of that.
You don't want to see take personal responsibility when you do that.
But I mean, I don't see the initiative with it.
If we leave the weekends.
I don't want to.
It's not just about me.
But I think people would be more able to go to that as well.
I would.
If that's the case.
I don't want to.
That's not.
We get people in here for trash.
You know, give them a big double night long for me.
I don't look.
So like we're finding some common ground here.
Anyone else wish to comment on the amendment to the motion.
Seeing none.
Let's vote on the amendment.
Correct.
Mr. Burns.
Correct.
Well, actually.
Effectively.
It was a substitute.
You know.
He just called him in.
He's the original.
But we're going on this.
This path.
This is.
This is part.
It's part.
We would go to a second reason.
We're moving forward.
Because it is not less restricted.
And then the verb is actually a blank slightly.
We want to get to a, which is what does that mean.
Which is what currently is now, okay? Cool. So I've been
All the guys in this thing up and wouldn't make it more restrictive for her proposal to make it from six to seven. It would.
Yes, thank you.
She was there.
Maybe I can fix it.
We can talk about it later.
I heard a lot of wrong professionals with that for something else as well.
The majority of the boys would all be allowed. Well, it's six, six and six.
So something that lasts a speaker.
Correct.
Ben, I want to pan, all those back out for treating a casual man.
It's more restrictive. So we have to do this first reading all over again.
So like, yeah, I'd like Mr. Geer mentioned, how much do we keep doing this and getting it perfect?
Yeah, I don't want to keep, I feel like we're in the Maddie class, we're just sick.
But if we're at six now and we're going to seven, that's more restrictive.
We have to do this.
We're taking the right of the building.
For the other side.
Okay, I got you now.
I got you now.
I wish I could get this lead pass.
We don't think whole maintenance is it, sir.
That's the oldest answer.
So if you listen to your old orders, it's seven, it's seven a.m.
Who is he?
It's seven.
It's four.
One.
The orders is written a little bit different.
It doesn't really be different, shape between construction and law.
And it's just noises that produce a decimal level greater than that.
That's not as you can get a seven a.m.
And that's a big one.
It's a big one.
Some bad recreation.
Parks recreation under the new ordinance, some of the new ordinance,
whatever that parks you like.
That's from the United States.
You said it was eight to ten.
Yeah, I'll tell you.
But you also said any city sponsored activity is exempt.
Correct.
Yes, city sponsored activities are exempt.
Organized athletic contest are the hours of 8 a.m.
To 10 p.m.
Does that hit the blowers and all that stuff?
We're just, you know, it's amazing.
Have a big one.
Yes.
So we would have had the actual, what was the generator for?
I believe the eight to ten would be the actual hitting on the bullhole,
the young of the crowd, all the announcers and everything.
I sit there.
Yes, sir.
Just so that we're all here.
Can we add a friendly amendment to Mr. Browning's amendment?
If you're okay with it, since it's less restricted,
we don't have to go back to first reading to get speech views.
7 a.m.
Yes, 7 a.m.
4 everything.
It's a 16.
No.
It's a big question.
Mr. Burns.
I'm trying to keep the noise where it's not 6 a.m.
Maybe 7 a.m. for VG.
And all of the residents that don't want to hear,
oh, but it's a 6 a.m.
So it's current in that act.
It's a good act.
It's cool.
That's it.
It's a huge change.
So we're not changing.
That's not a huge change in this.
It's important.
It's important at the same time.
But there's just other things besides the lawman and the services
at the same.
So the only change in all six a.m.
It's even loud noises that 6 a.m.
or unusual.
Or unusual.
It's a huge tool.
It's a really awesome.
Kind of a little bit.
This is for me.
You have to be the first to realize the whole thing.
This means you're kissing.
You started.
You're kissing.
About 6 a.m.
And we're on a plane.
What's going to say that you're on a plane?
They can run outside and play.
They just can't make loud and unusual noise.
Kids planes kind of normal noise.
I think would be all right.
All right.
Any other additional and then I believe what we're now
The accountability on is the exact noise ordinance that Mr. Burns has proposed with Mr. Browning's amendment that will change that downtown area to Monday through Thursday to 1159 p.m. instead of 2 a.m.
But keep intact. You Friday and Saturday 2 a.m.
Well, that's Sunday where it's, I'm sorry.
Some day it's Sunday.
It's Sunday.
And then the Councilman Schmidt amendment, I have to change that original opening noise from 6 a.m. to 7 a.m.
And then did we have one last one?
That's it.
All right. So, Council, please vote before we talk about it.
It's a good thing. There's a second.
We'll just get all sorted out.
All right.
All right. That's past 7 a.m.
You guys really worked out.
I bring this on to item 10.02.
Ordnance 2189.
Amending the land development code chapter nine.
And it's administrative procedures once again.
Thank you.
Council.
A lot of orders.
It's the city council.
It's the beginning.
Chapter nine.
Land development code.
That's the process.
And subdivision class.
For questions.
I would.
For statute.
Provide for authority.
Provide the server building.
Directed day.
All right.
I'm sorry.
So this item.
Has a printed title.
I'm like.
Mr. Burns.
Relates to a recent.
Build up.
That's for an legislative session.
Senate bill.
7.84.
The sign-ins law.
I have been 20.
And it became effective on July 1st.
And basically what this is.
It.
In general.
Those,
what we'll do is we amended.
A couple sections.
The chapter 9.
One line length me could just do.
A consistent with his new.
Statue.
And it.
And.
As a few term.
Conditions to.
We've got just a few sentences that basically, in there,
we've cleaned up the frugal table that we showed how things were approved in the
landed on the coast, to say that the folks are also taking a blast,
we'll be approved by the development administrator and courts with the timeframes
that have been established in there, consistent with statute.
So, let's take a go to our LBA as well.
Last week, for the first time, we made a frugal, and with that,
the staff is perfectly recommending the adoption to order number 289 to amend
the land help and go to the regarding flat and re-clot reviews and frugal,
to be consistent with the amended section 177.0771 for four sessions.
Thank you.
So, the first thing that's applying for permits, this is what we're talking about.
Thank you.
People that are applying for permits.
For going in for some of the different classes, so that's okay.
Thank you.
Everyone that's going to be able to go through online process,
or at least a face-to-face assignment.
If there's been face-to-face assignment, the application process will be online.
Does a certain degree come in, that's beginning at the beginning at the end.
Yeah.
Any other chance of process?
Okay.
The staff did the way of building up topics.
So, you pretty early coming up for a serious developer.
Not going to do it.
question on this type, unless you're concerned. Seeing none as anyone from the public,
which to speak on this out, it's seeing no accounts of you, which to make a motion.
Seeing none, we will abandon the idea going on.
That this isn't the word as this require about six times.
I think it's done as though.
Second.
Much had made by Councilman Schmidt, seconded by Councilman Peter, to approve,
ordinance 21, and any additional comments.
Council, please vote.
It does pass unanimously.
Which in our humble level, the world year,
means is to item 12.
Is that correct?
I don't want to start the ordinance on second.
Item 11.1.
Board minutes 2186, and many CEO of a chapter nine of Fences, Chief Finish.
All of it.
Chief, Mr. Brings, first.
At ordinance 2186, the ordinance is the City Council,
the City Council, the City of Columbia, four to five,
and 40.
Great section 9.1, three to go to ordinance.
This title control access to the City of Columbia,
still the rules, trespass points, and criminal penalties.
Great section 9.1, four to the code of ordinance.
This title appeals to trespass warnings.
Great section 9.1, five to go to ordinance.
This title probation and trespass warnings.
Issued for violation of state ordinance,
provide for severability and provide for effective day.
This is the second reading.
It should fail for that.
We're going to just not end this change since the first reading.
This is Mr. Brings stated.
This talks about designated places as the public forms,
the public forms, the public forms, the non-polar forms,
and also talks about a trust pass that people proceed.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir.
Any questions on this for or feedback?
Does anyone from a public which is speak on this ordinance?
Council, would you like to take action?
Make a motion to adopt 2080 states, according to the CLO chapter 9 of the Council.
Second.
Motion made by council and mayoral, seconded by council and gator to approve ordinance,
2180 states, additional comments.
I will not be supporting it, is based on our previous objections.
Yes, sir. Thank you.
Council, please vote.
And the motion does pass 61, which raises to item 11.2.
Ordnance to 2180 states, the Council has to be bold.
Be sure to vote for authority and finance.
In fact, creating section 9.16 for the current ordinance is entitled,
making up a lot of property, building, or right-of-ways, prohibited, improbable and quick-to-date.
This is the second meeting of chief debate.
Chief.
The mayor will see a number of changes between force and second meeting.
This was related to the state statute that passed, which prohibits municipalities from allowing people to camp in public spaces.
Thank you, sir.
Questions on the side and poor chief debate?
Comments?
What's our workflow as far as...
And we may have not had this yet, but as far as enforcing that if it can't be starched.
So they need force primarily over a trust pass offense.
We do a lot of them in the same way that camping is not allowed on city property.
If they do what they can for, continue to camp on city property, then they will be possibly a rustic or trust pass after morning.
Or they can be cited as any civil citation on the encoder process.
And would I be accurate by just encouraging those that are listening or watching,
get to call it a non-emergency hotline or hotline.
This batch has to report this.
Yes, for this morning's days, please, along public property.
So it's always camping on private property.
The mechanism of the workflow would be different.
But on the public property that we're looking at right now.
Yes.
We would encourage the residents to call this batch to identify the issue.
Okay.
Anyone else?
Seeing none of anyone from public worship speak on this side?
Council do we have any action?
Mayors have a new staff recommendation to adopt orders number 2188.
Take it.
Motion made by Councilman Jeter, second by Councilman Merrill to approve ordinance 2188.
Any additional comments?
No, sir.
Council, please vote.
And that motion does pass unanimously.
Bringing this down to item 12.1, this bonus.
Thank you.
A post County Housing Department, thank you a letter, requesting that another council member be appointed to serve on the affordable housing advisory committee.
Mr. Walker submitted his resignation.
So we need to get a volunteer and fill that decision.
Please volunteers from the board to serve on the affordable housing advisory committee.
This forms give any information about how frequent the meetings are or their health.
I don't have that.
We think that I think other than now is that.
Can you get that information to do there?
Okay.
Or Mr. Walker.
Do you know that information?
It was, I believe, monthly.
Once a week.
Okay.
And do you know where they were?
Um, shall we head next in, Chris?
Okay.
What day?
You know.
I don't recall that.
I don't recall.
Does anyone from the board wish to?
Maybe.
I can get that.
Give me one second.
Okay.
Um.
Okay.
What he said is that one of the two locations in the bell, aren't Chris B.
The dates remaining are September 4th.
November 6th.
One PM.
Um.
And I think that's about it.
Okay.
Any volunteers on that?
Yes.
Thursdays.
Because.
Do, does it have to be an elective official?
Uh, yes sir.
Okay.
We have an, uh, an illegal agreement that we're becoming.
For this to be.
True.
There's two more.
September 4th, November 6th.
Okay.
One.
Thursday.
Second.
We have Mr. Merle.
It's a volunteer to be up any, uh, nominate.
Nomination.
There.
Like nominate.
It's a mirror.
What the second.
All right.
Got a motion by councilman.
Schmidt.
Seconded by councilman.
Geeter to nominate.
Councilman.
Then Merle.
Here.
The day.
For the affordable housing.
Finally.
Further discussion.
Thank you.
I'm going to want to talk.
I see more concerned about the midnight party.
I'm going to say this is one of the clock.
Another day.
Get the call.
The one.
Perfect.
Councilman.
It's about.
That's not the force.
That.
Great team.
Seven.
That.
So just a couple things.
Getting some.
Really positive feedback in our community.
The initiative.
We had a couple groups reach out.
We've only shot today.
They want to do their own kind of positive things.
Pretty cool there.
I should be able to present.
Next meeting.
A schedule for the baseball fields.
To include free versus pay.
And all kinds of different.
Appetites for you that to choose from.
So we'll be good to go there.
And then if you want to move that out to the other courts.
Or whatever sports that we have.
Good to go.
One member of council.
Number who requested to see if we could or should sell the Gulf view.
Mr. Burns has done the homework.
The answer is yes.
Can.
The other half of the phrase was should we.
It is generated a profit.
Old park 100,000.
Is that right.
annually.
So if.
If we want to.
Take some direction here.
If not.
Let it run.
It's.
So it is generating a revenue.
Against all expenses.
I.
The large elevator expense that we have lived and over it.
I should.
That ever happened.
But against all of their expense.
Is it.
Generally.
What.
What a.
Right.
I'm.
And.
What.
The last thing I wanted to talk about.
I asked.
Mr. sports to be here.
I guess you had to.
We, you know, it's just a high-level discussion on the monies that we are putting into
that group.
I'd like to turn the news and do a project for us.
We have some grandiose visions of parking structures and some downtown improvements, and
that's where I'm going to rely on him to bring me an idea potentially to move our library
with a public-private partnership and put that into the in charge of building this garage,
or whatever it is.
Unfortunately, I think in years past, and I don't have the language of front of me, council decided
to get rid of the tax breaks for this exact type of thing.
And this is the only way I know how to do it, what I've been successful with in other places.
So if we need to look back into getting that language created, so we can do these
public-private partnerships, but then I would like to assign that to him to get after it.
So thoughts there.
Yeah.
Don't let that matter like that.
I'm not going to get me curious about what inspired me.
The next fire, I think it was voted out saying, we don't want to do tax breaks anymore for
it.
And whatever we need to do to, you know, revive that.
That's the tool I use to bring in that entity.
Yeah.
That's why I want to pay for it.
And if we need our support, help revive that.
That's what I was.
I'll have that language at the next council meeting then, and then we can move forward.
But otherwise, I'm going to have been started with this because I'm referring to the
by reduction in hookup fees and those kind of things.
It's all negotiated, so some of it, but typically 10-year tax breaks, I still want the entity
to do on actual property tax, correct any different, there's several different flavors, sure.
That being said, I still want them to improve the stormwater and the roads and the lights as part
of the project.
Again, that's, none of that's cheap, right, so it's got to be fair and equitable for everybody.
So there's a lot of negotiation, but it does bring in.
I'm going to ask them to submit, I would love to explore that.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Did you?
I missed that first part of your introduction.
Did you sign the library in parking, girl, all of the time?
Correct.
So just again, lightboarding, a library is not very accessible for children and they get out
school and mom has got to go to work, you know, I'd like to see a closer to the schools
that we have and the kids can get off and whatever, go to school, go to library, do their
homework.
That sort of thing.
That property is a very good, my opinion, would return some investment, right, if we sell it, potentially
to this group, they can build whatever they want there, I have some ideas on boutiques, whatever,
and then have them build the garage as well for us and then we work out the particular
from there.
At that point, we would have a parking garage, potentially, and a library more suitable
to do the kids that can actually get there, not fight the traffic and that's what we're going to
do.
Go.
Thank you.
Mr. Babes.
Did you get a parking garage?
Yeah.
So I don't know the roads, but where the food trucks are right across the street, there's that piece of
the way that we own, that is much to the music of the video.
Yeah, we're doing it.
Yeah.
That's a good sense.
Yes.
Yeah.
That new is the end.
Yes.
So that's the separate issue.
I have had a couple discussions with the Gibson's, and they are amenable to what I've
proposed.
They're just working with their attorney, and they're going to get back to me, so that's a separate
issue.
Okay.
I just want to say yes to exploring all of that, and thank you for being willing to pick
up these rocks and tackle whatever is underneath it.
I'd also want to let everybody know when the community with the red light on, we are not
this is all whiteboard.
Chris, there's all just thinking outside the box, how can we maybe do this?
We're not proving anything.
We're not saying yes, anything.
That's funny, money.
We're just whiteboarding and trying to make things happen.
You've been great.
That's so far.
Keep doing it.
Thank you.
So let's just say, it doesn't look forward to Mr. Sparks with the back of your presenting
project work.
Got it.
Okay.
And with that, just seeing it all kind of, I've become together, but we've set away
to be a knowledge for designing around the man for it.
I mean, that's what I was forward, and then the preferred alternatives are the preferred route,
I believe it's called as route tours, but it shows a downtown, I think it's called a common
green.
It's not a remember, but that's where the library is set, you've seen that, right?
If I have, I don't remember.
You mentioned that downtown, a master of planning, a science problem, and that, but that's
2018.
Yeah.
And that's we submitted to the state for their understanding and what the we the purple
walnut, which included the library, got just so you know, and there, so it's shown in hope
and green there, I think it's called open green option there and it shows, you know, potential.
So, it's interesting to see it, it just comes together down here, and there was a
study that showed that the library, just like you said, should probably be elsewhere, probably
smaller.
Okay.
I just now heard it, talked about a problem, public partnership, it was drawn, the preferred route,
and that was called parking.
It just gives me an avenue to have somebody else pay for these, sure, big ticket items.
So, it wouldn't be parking, but a problem to be with the parking.
Potentially.
So, again, many different flavors that first floor could be shops, boutiques, whatever,
second floor parking, so one and so forth and go vertical.
And just, as Councilman Jeer said, all whiteboarding, but also no plan at all immediately to shut
down our library, we're going to exactly that meeting before, exciting to sit through it again,
just with the public, not understanding exactly what we're standing here.
So, again, these are just all ideas, good clarification, where we can wire them, would be a
more better library, more appropriate, please, please, please, please.
Okay.
Anything else on your city, if you're interested?
I'm sorry.
Mr. Tates.
So, on the hacks, right?
So, whoever, whoever the person that they're making the purchase, and then they're going to go
a tax rate, but I'll, of course, it will be a garage and we're from a city to use as
parking.
Is that a record?
Yes.
So, again, this guy's the limit right now.
The goal was to get a garage and wrap some business into, you know, that kind of tax revenue
in, take some burden off the house tops, but at the same time, if they're going to build something
like that full of the city, you've got to give him some tax rates, right?
Absolutely.
Okay.
Anything else in the city manager report?
No, that's the high level items, also, if the rest is from budget.
Wonderful.
Okay.
City Attorney reports.
Council, thank you for, for being here, been in our contract earlier.
I'll, be my best, be in the city already, and I do appreciate it.
Mr. President.
I didn't get to be here for that, but I couldn't think to do a fantastic job as our city
to turn out sincerely to appreciate it.
I know we've paid you.
But if you're a really good job of bringing us information, being informed on all of the items
and offering up from a kind of lips to things, that we probably wouldn't have without you, so I sincerely
appreciate it.
Okay.
That means it's a song to Mayor Council, final comments.
Let's get to the vote.
Thank you.
A lot of folks that were here before and on, but I just want to give thank Mr. Davis and thank you
Ms. Riley.
Whether it's...
I just think...
The conversation about chest improvement, but the calm area here from our friend from each of you that has been here throughout.
But what I'm going with this is that these are only just a few people that represent a lot of people out there that don't hear or see this.
And just want to encourage those that are still here to go back into their community to support what the government is trying to do, working with the community on finding wind winds off.
It's still going through the bureaucrat process that we all think we have to go through to Mr. Burn and keep this compliant on.
So just to quick shout out the staff and council, as well as the few community members that are allowed to go back to the community and really support that we are trying to work with the community with the government to make things happen.
That's all I got, Mr. Mayor.
Thank you, sir.
Mr. Walker.
Nothing at this time.
Just remember.
Yes, I would like.
I know he spoke about it in the states that it got getting in the last year, so from August of 2004,
August of 2004 to August of 2004 to August of 2004 to exit and he was from all into the least he did not have to let us see.
Okay.
I will send that out.
I don't know what the form of processes is.
I haven't got that far yet, but I haven't particularly necessarily seen one, but I will have what we have to you.
Marlott.
Awesome.
That's all right.
Thank you, sir.
Mr. Barry.
I want to thank Mr. Davis for all that you've done.
Your first time here, you've been busy busy busy busy busy busy busy.
And I appreciate that.
I appreciate that.
And thank you.
Thank you.
Very nice.
Everybody's been very supportive of my bizarre idea.
It's more important.
It's a team.
I don't love it.
Thank you, Mayor.
Mr. Jr.
Yeah.
I love the new blood now.
I'll set the box link in as well.
If you're looking for a sense of earlier, we're kind of discussed.
I've moved on.
The lobbyists didn't get things done.
You know, otherwise we get things done.
That work.
I'm all four and four and those as well, too.
Because if those speed things up, then let's go that round.
Come on, Mayor.
We.
I think we've heard from the community quite a bit.
We've tried to help us see us interact and try to make changes and try to be.
Try to adapt.
And somebody who keeps coming in Mr. Hancock.
I am one of the councilman.
That he, as you know, hold up and I went down there.
I wasn't part of the landing project.
I was on board of the time.
But to think that we couldn't find somewhere to move.
There's trash dumpsters for them.
Before it becomes a problem.
It's just something I told them to bring up.
I.
It's something that brings up what we shouldn't do it.
And specifically design that way.
It's not always going to work.
And it is what it is.
But I look at it.
And with my.
I'm trying to.
There's probably somewhere else with it.
But that's so.
For a later day.
I just.
I'm supportive.
So yes.
I agree.
My.
I'm trying to.
I.
That's not a little conversation.
Some people that are substantially smarter than me.
And I don't have a good answer right now.
I am sitting down with them.
When's their Thursday this week?
I don't remember.
I think it's Thursday.
And that is on the to do list.
In addition to.
Um.
That come that contract.
Down there.
Get after a little bit.
Yeah.
Awesome.
We'll see.
Thank you, sir.
I'm sorry.
I have several shots.
So I'm going to get it really quickly.
I'd like to.
First of all.
I was supposed to promise.
Congratulations.
I appreciate it.
I'll see.
Right.
I'm sorry.
Yeah.
Answer questions.
You can.
A little bit.
I'm going to
I can't do it.
I know I'm gonna get stuck.
If you're stuck, try to go to the crest and I cannot do it.
I enjoy my meetings with you and I think that your time is just amazing.
So far.
Okay, Chief Page, thank you so much.
I wanted to tell you, I really enjoyed participating in the National Night Out with the PDE
and also the Oklahoma Sheriff's Office.
Such a wonderful, wonderful partnership.
And then, nationwide, you know, this has been going on for quite a while.
And I just really, really do with the National Night Out.
Thank you, sir, for all that you do.
Thank you very much.
You have a wonderful staff, too.
I love talking with them.
The other thing is, I wanted to give a shout-out to BLF and it's for the Football and Beach House.
I've got a lot of authority for the rugby team.
For the basic departments on their phase one.
I know it's been a long time coming for her and her staff.
And so it was a pleasure for me to be there to watch them bring by them.
And last but not least, Mr. Hill, I searched you out.
I wanted to tell you, I thought about the golf courses.
So I decided to do my lunch at the golf course.
It was really exciting.
I enjoyed the golf card ride with you, then.
I've been thinking every since I wrote a McDonald's book.
I got it.
But this wanted to tell you, I'm Mr. Served, but I will come back to visit with you.
But I did lunch.
Amazing lunch.
Really have a good time out there.
And so we'll catch up with you.
All right.
And I'm done.
Thank you, man.
I want to echo your comments regarding the national night out.
I'm going to remember a king of the base side breeze as well.
Chief David.
I couldn't beat him around as a football and beach resident.
When you go to a event like that, you see so many of your officers there.
And they're not just standing there.
A lot of times you're going to an event.
And there's people that have to be there.
There's people that want to be there.
And it seemed like all of your officers wanted to be there.
And they were great.
We didn't interact with kids with the community.
It was really, really neat.
Lastly, I want to say, I know we've gotten a lot of correspondence from residents in the community
over the summertime that have, or actually even toward the end of last year,
that had been, quote, unquote, ensnared in our traffic cameras.
Which now we are not the only city that has in our schools zones.
It's a school-backed session.
And those cameras go on and they're ready to go.
We have had some positive, I think, discussions regarding getting flashing lights installed
at all of the school zones, not even just the ones that have cameras.
But that money that we've put into the general fund that's come from that is your one full project.
Just like that.
So Chief Page and I have the National Night Out had a great conversation with resident that was very interested
in having flashing lights installed out there in front of the St. Mary school.
Chief Page Community came back with Mr. Payne.
And I think that's something that we can certainly do moving forward with that revenue that comes in.
So when those tickets go out, money does come in.
The city's portion of it is assigned to be used for more traffic enforcement and safety.
The public safety, especially around those schools.
So anything that we can do to help increase the safety around our schools is something that I'm always going to be for.
If you're going to email our council and me looking for a little sympathy for going 53 miles an hour in a 30 mile an hour's end,
near your school, you're probably barking up the wrong tree.
I do appreciate everything that our police department does.
And you guys have done a really good honor, please.
All right, we'll adjourn for LMD in this bar.
About ten minutes.
Ten minutes.
And then we'll be back to you.
Stay here all at least a minute.