[0:20] It's 7:05, March 3, 2026. This
[0:24] is the council meeting. The secretary is going
[0:25] to call roll.
[0:34] Here here
[0:42] Israel Rivera here Jenny Rivera here
[0:47] Sullivan here
[0:49] Bacen here
[0:54] please stand for the oath to the
[0:56] flag Surely
[0:58] to the flag of the United States,
[1:01] uh, of the Republic in which I stand
[1:05] , one nation under God,
[1:08] indivisible, with liberty and
[1:12] justice for all.
[1:16] Okay, I have a few announcements before we
[1:20] begin.
[1:23] This meeting has been recorded live
[1:26] on public television and has been
[1:29] interpreted in Spanish. We are here at
[1:38] the Council Chamber of Commerce
[1:41] and we have some people joining via
[1:43] Zoom, which is totally understandable because it's
[1:45] quite slippery out there.
[1:48] So whatever we start, I'm going to
[1:49] introduce a motion to call on Lisa
[1:52] that for the purpose of this meeting,
[1:54] all motions to
[1:56] receive and refer points to the committee, to
[1:59] take points from the table, to put points on
[2:00] the table, to put points as a package, to
[2:04] comply with points, to adopt
[2:07] points if required, to suspend
[2:09] rules, unless there is a unification, we
[2:11] all follow in favor. Someone objects.
[2:14] Okay, counselor.
[2:17] His name came up first tonight,
[2:21] so that's for your information.
[2:25] And since many of you
[2:28] aren't here tonight to sign
[2:31] the committee report, he's
[2:36] someone who objects to signing
[2:39] the committee report,
[2:41] and that's why I'll be
[2:46] doing the
[2:49] rules. Just one, or when we get
[2:52] there? I
[2:55] meant signing the orders, not
[2:57] the vote. Oh, okay. Thank you.
[3:05] And I think that's for the
[3:08] announcements part,
[3:10] so please be patient with us
[3:12] , raise your hands. Let's make sure we
[3:15] call everyone and do what I
[3:17] actually do.
[3:20] And as for the reporter, Mr. President,
[3:24] I have a couple of updates
[3:28] and reminders for everyone. Thanks,
[3:30] Jeffre. I'm
[3:32] taking water
[3:33] for always being there to help
[3:39] as a reminder that
[3:42] you are serving breakfast to the
[3:45] organizers
[3:49] on the morning of the St.
[3:52] Patrick's Day parade. We have, uh, we're
[3:55] seeing reservations for March 12.
[3:58] Uh, we also sent out an email
[4:00] early today for registration,
[4:03] uh, but a reminder there will be a
[4:05] shuttle going from Wof to
[4:09] Keer Plaza. Hey, if he's marching,
[4:13] please let Jeffre know if he's
[4:14] planning to be at the march. And there
[4:17] will also be a breakfast meeting for employees
[4:19] on Friday, March 20.
[4:24] Uh, you also received an email
[4:25] about this. Uh, it's from 8 in the morning
[4:29] until 9:30, you're invited to
[4:32] understand. There is a calendar, so
[4:34] please answer that so they can
[4:36] count the food correctly. At our
[4:38] next meeting
[4:40] we will be inviting
[4:42] the winners and dignitaries of the
[4:46] parade, the parade commissioner,
[4:49] the Order of Herians and Caledonian Pip
[4:54] will be there. Thanks Jeffre for
[4:56] coordinating that. Hey, it looks like I'm going to get
[4:58] an award. It will be a little
[5:01] strange for me to give that to myself.
[5:04] and an update from Jeffrey. If you
[5:08] are attending the meeting via
[5:10] Zoom or are on the committee and plan to
[5:13] attend the meeting via Zoom,
[5:15] please do what Dad reminds
[5:18] Jeffre to do by noon on the day of the
[5:20] meeting
[5:22] because you don't need to print the
[5:24] packets. If you are on the committee
[5:27] and will only be
[5:29] on Zoom, you don't have to let them know.
[5:32] He printed the variscope for us; it
[5:35] would be a great help so that we don't
[5:36] print them and then say more paper,
[5:40] and I think it's a piece of general
[5:42] information,
[5:45] something I wanted to share. Obviously there have
[5:48] been many topics that are
[5:52] passionate
[5:56] and there are many things and I love it because that's
[5:58] democracy. Having said that,
[6:02] just because it's a priority for you,
[6:04] doesn't mean it's a priority for
[6:07] everyone in the body, and that doesn't apply
[6:10] to advice here. It's
[6:13] also because of the audience. The
[6:15] legislative branch is here to legislate, and
[6:17] sometimes it takes a while. There's no big
[6:19] conspiracy, there's no
[6:21] grand plan,
[6:24] sometimes it just takes time for
[6:26] things to happen.
[6:29] So the way we work
[6:31] with each one is that we'll be able to get
[6:33] there.
[6:36] Now I feel I have to remember
[6:37] the people we have a lot on
[6:42] our jackets, the employees
[6:44] have many who are working.
[6:45] We need to be aware of this
[6:49] and have our expectations and try to
[6:51] be very fair with the
[6:56] late and requested files, but at the same time I
[6:58] think that sometimes I feel
[7:05] that we have to do a
[7:07] search for what is urgent.
[7:11] I will try to do as fair as
[7:12] possible.
[7:16] But I have a lot of
[7:19] trouble with the late files,
[7:23] but we'll treat everyone with
[7:24] kindness. But having done that, there are
[7:27] other updates that
[7:30] people want to let the public know about
[7:33] related to the
[7:35] president's report
[7:37] with Cilia. I would
[7:40] like to ask for a moment of silence
[7:43] for John Heisen, who has passed away. Oh,
[7:45] thank you.
[7:56] so much. It
[8:01] was an amazing business, so
[8:04] our thoughts and prayers are
[8:06] with his family. Thanks, Mike.
[8:11] Okay, public comment.
[8:15] Next one. And here I have three people.
[8:18] If you are on Zoom, please raise your
[8:21] hand so Jeffre knows if you are here
[8:23] for public comment
[8:25] and how to save to keep uh for the time
[8:30] and so you for how it works 2
[8:32] minutes and I will be monitoring the
[8:35] time. I have these time letters that
[8:37] I will hold and for the time
[8:41] I am allowing people to
[8:44] have their name, address or district.
[8:50] You tell me when I
[8:52] first have David Owen from 12 Mason R.
[8:58] Thank you
[9:00] David 12.
[9:07] Recently the MFMA was signed,
[9:10] Mayor Garcia collected and declared a
[9:14] first step. I would like to suggest that
[9:17] step two should occur in four weeks from
[9:19] today, which will be on the 31st,
[9:22] when applications of the position
[9:25] of the CAFO are
[9:29] raised. Yes, I was in the
[9:31] construction business for many years and I
[9:32] would like to suggest to the board
[9:37] that the person who will be
[9:40] carrying out the tasks
[9:43] alongside the mayor
[9:46] and the individual mission dynamic should not
[9:50] be surprised
[9:52] to see a request for a salary close to the
[9:57] limit of what was dimensioned.
[9:59] Recently, step three should be
[10:01] in 4 months or on June 3rd and in
[10:05] fiscal year 26 a minute ago and the
[10:09] auditors pointed out the expansions that
[10:12] were seen and that the auditors' work
[10:13] for 24-25 will be completed
[10:15] by the date and that is also good
[10:17] news for a variety
[10:20] of economic and different
[10:24] quality of life reasons.
[10:25] Much has been said about my faith,
[10:28] I don't really understand it,
[10:30] but there have been
[10:33] significant changes in how the government
[10:36] operates, the financial systems,
[10:39] departmental changes, the
[10:43] investment community, the educational focus,
[10:46] public safety, and support for businesses. What I
[10:49] mean is the methods now and the
[10:51] way
[10:54] the new CAFO is being said,
[10:57] but I can emphasize that what
[10:59] I think requires a
[11:01] diligent effort on the part of all the
[11:04] people involved. Thank you.
[11:07] so much.
[11:09] Okay. Following. I have
[11:12] José Extra 139 Hillside.
[11:19] Oh, Adestra, my apologies, it's okay. I know a
[11:24] lot of things are going on here
[11:29] and I don't want to be a broken record,
[11:35] but we have a chance.
[11:38] I read
[11:40] the overdose figure as being below
[11:45] 20% and I would like our policies
[11:47] to be transparent and
[11:49] consistently updated.
[11:51] Reassure us because they are not alone in
[11:53] jail right now.
[11:56] I think we'd all like to know that
[11:58] figure and be positive about it,
[12:01] but I don't think it's about being more
[12:03] transparent. And beyond that,
[12:08] I am ashamed because our country just
[12:11] bombed Iran and they killed and
[12:15] bombed a girls' school, they
[12:17] bombed a maternity district,
[12:21] they violated international law in a
[12:25] similar place where we have been
[12:27] funding Israel to commit genocide
[12:29] in Palestine.
[12:31] I would like the people here to
[12:34] represent the diversity of
[12:36] Israeli businesses that are here in the town.
[12:39] I believe we should not be doing business with
[12:42] people who are killing children in
[12:44] schools and hospitals.
[12:46] I think we should also
[12:48] pay our federal taxes until
[12:49] our executive branch stops
[12:52] breaking the laws
[12:56] and expanding and using
[12:59] methon.
[13:01] And also an extension of looking for
[13:03] free housing that
[13:07] is paid for through the
[13:11] rent control, if they support
[13:15] rent control, because we do
[13:17] n't need it as
[13:20] well as the project was frozen, we
[13:26] developed the same ones at the same time, we are already on
[13:29] time.
[13:30] We were already on time.
[13:32] Excuse me, I'm trying to be fair
[13:35] to everyone. He's a little
[13:38] respectful.
[13:43] Okay. We have Jennifer Kids 63.
[13:47] Arthur Street, good night. Thank you.
[13:50] I would like to speak briefly about the
[13:54] meetings of the committees of the
[13:58] board. This is important to help make
[14:00] decisions that affect
[14:02] neighboring residents throughout our city.
[14:05] Quotes refer to people who respect
[14:07] rules, understand processes, and are
[14:09] prepared to shoulder our
[14:11] responsibilities with a role of
[14:12] professionalism and integrity.
[14:15] Any question needs to be
[14:17] clarified in the presence
[14:20] of public trust,
[14:22] even in small meetings. My
[14:25] second comment would continue to
[14:28] review the public and
[14:31] cause-related comments.
[14:33] That was a bit of direct access
[14:36] to this body. Some changes to
[14:38] these rules should be carefully considered so
[14:41] that participation can be
[14:44] greater and not limited. eh requests to
[14:48] feel receptive or intimidating. Uh,
[14:51] you can unmute people so they can
[14:54] fully participate. When a
[14:56] resident feels heard and respected,
[14:58] the government works better.
[15:01] Selective officers
[15:05] with the professional point and the
[15:09] leadership point, including
[15:11] essential public communication, the
[15:13] advisors bearing a
[15:16] higher responsibility and standard. Thank you for
[15:18] your core.
[15:20] Thank you so much.
[15:22] We have
[15:25] Spencer Fox Peterson online.
[15:29] Good evening, Spencer Fox 51 on the
[15:33] Street. I just want to put a couple of
[15:35] things on the table. He appreciated that
[15:37] people mentioned him in
[15:39] public comments.
[15:40] Our executive branch is out of
[15:43] control, that's what you
[15:45] mean, but also the
[15:47] public comment. Some of the rules didn't
[15:52] specifically address my
[15:58] avatar, and I'm very proud to be part of
[16:01] the LGBT community.
[16:03] K. I don't know if I'm on a positive vibe or whatever
[16:08] , whatever. That, that's... that
[16:15] 's freedom of speech. So no,
[16:18] some people can't even respect
[16:19] the first one here where they are under this
[16:22] earth, I leave this constitution. The
[16:25] end of the story. This
[16:27] discussion about public commentary. He
[16:31] appreciated that
[16:33] access and more participation is the
[16:35] best thing for us.
[16:38] These rules should not be used
[16:40] instead. Anyone should
[16:41] speak up. This is ridiculous. Ridiculous, those 2
[16:44] minutes. But I'm going to make a
[16:47] comment before they comment on
[16:50] their civilization. It is not the role of the
[16:53] government. If
[16:57] you mention God on these
[16:59] walls, that's the end of the story.
[17:02] You need a
[17:06] fresh perspective on the Constitution and the
[17:08] document, and you should be
[17:09] ashamed and listen to the
[17:13] constituents. We are good people and
[17:14] we are good for the city. Thank you for
[17:16] your time.
[17:25] Wait a second.
[17:36] With your hand raised.
[17:41] Yes, thanks. I'm in District 6.
[17:44] Can you
[17:46] hear me? I
[17:50] just want
[17:53] the advisor with the initiative of
[17:55] Order 51
[17:59] that offers to create
[18:01] a body with people with
[18:03] lived experiences in our most
[18:06] vulnerable communities. It is my belief that this must have been
[18:09] done in the
[18:12] opium process, from the opium funds. I
[18:14] really want to take notes on the
[18:16] initiative that's there.
[18:20] And to show my appreciation for this
[18:24] and for everyone who is doing
[18:25] the work of having the
[18:28] difficult conversations of public commentary, it is my
[18:30] belief also that we cannot
[18:35] obstruct the public process, and I thank
[18:38] the people who are taking the
[18:39] time to look at that and the
[18:41] barriers that it creates
[18:44] for vulnerable populations who do
[18:47] not have
[18:50] a direction to come here. Minute.
[18:52] Thank you.
[18:54] No comments. I just want to
[18:56] say I appreciate the log.
[18:59] Thank you.
[19:07] We have another person. No, that's
[19:12] cone puerperation.
[19:17] to take point 59 out of order.
[19:22] As has been done and circumvented to
[19:25] take point
[19:28] 59.
[19:34] Motion first the motion to suspend
[19:36] the rules. Everyone in favor. Does
[19:39] anyone object?
[19:44] Okay. Item 59 was the council
[19:46] ordered that in accordance with MEGL4
[19:52] they accept the fiscal year
[19:53] 26 provisions of the executive office of
[19:57] public safety and security of $50,000
[20:01] and establishment of the funds
[20:04] and receipts of expenses. Thank
[20:08] you, Mr. President.
[20:10] Item 59 is a mark from Governor
[20:14] Maurili in the amount of 50,000 for the
[20:17] Hollywood Police Department.
[20:20] That one was founded by Senator John
[20:24] Villis. This location includes 30,000
[20:26] for or a new gym equipment and I
[20:30] can tell you that having to ask
[20:31] the high agents this
[20:35] gym equipment has been there since the
[20:38] police department was built,
[20:41] which was in 1980, 1999, something like that,
[20:44] so that's what it's for. And there is
[20:49] no award for traffic equipment safety
[20:52] .
[20:55] The security team wears
[21:00] yellow vests that people will
[21:01] use to identify the police, and
[21:03] obviously for weekends, parades,
[21:06] or any
[21:11] traffic issues that need to be
[21:13] addressed. They're already quite worn, but
[21:16] Sergeant Sergio is here if anyone
[21:17] has any questions. Thank you, thank you
[21:20] for being here, Sergeant.
[21:23] Conselo, Smith. Thank you. And to the
[21:27] president through the body, uh, if
[21:30] we can suspend
[21:33] the rules so that the talent can
[21:34] speak, because it is my understanding, it is to
[21:36] pass it tonight rather than move it
[21:39] to finance.
[21:41] So, to make sure there's enough
[21:43] before
[21:45] the parade, we've suspended
[21:47] the rules so everyone can come here and
[21:49] talk to the council in favor.
[21:52] Someone objects.
[21:56] Hello.
[22:02] Sorry, sergeant.
[22:05] Not yet.
[22:07] Good night. Thank you. Yes.
[22:11] The boss is asking for a vote
[22:13] tonight. If we can vote
[22:16] tonight, we would normally go through the
[22:18] normal process, but the
[22:23] 20,000 is for
[22:26] safety vests. We're trying to get them
[22:29] here before the parade, and it's the
[22:32] urgency that came with it, and we're grateful for the
[22:35] process and all the time it took
[22:37] . This is not
[22:38] self-cleansing.
[22:40] That's Senator Lisa's brand and she
[22:44] helped us get it into the budget, and
[22:46] the other 30 will be for
[22:49] Gy's team, what the gym is for, what's going to be
[22:51] bought on YouTube. Is
[22:54] there anyone else? Does
[23:00] anyone else have any questions about
[23:02] the sergeant? I don't
[23:08] see any. Motion to approve.
[23:15] Motion to receive, accept and pass the
[23:18] first reading. Thank you.
[23:21] Motion to receive, accept and pass the
[23:24] first reading.
[23:27] So, in favor, I,
[23:29] someone, put forward a motion to pass the
[23:32] first reading.
[23:34] Second,
[23:40] the secretary is going to call roll. You are voting
[23:42] if you are voting to opt for item 50
[23:47] tonight. Say yes.
[23:55] yes, yes.
[24:03] Esra Rivera, yes. Jenny Rivera, yes.
[24:08] Sulo, yes. Toimo, yes. Bacen, yes. Andersen
[24:15] Burgos, yes. Unanimous vote.
[24:22] With that, 59 will be spent testing the
[24:25] alternative.
[24:26] Thank you.
[24:30] Give the agenda.
[24:34] Item three is the minutes of February
[24:39] 17. Are
[24:41] there any
[24:42] corrections, comments, additions, or
[24:46] a motion to receive or adopt?
[24:49] There's a second, everyone's in favor. Someone
[24:54] objects,
[24:56] so let's continue.
[24:59] Four of what I know is still on
[25:01] the table
[25:05] and five. Yes.
[25:09] Six.
[25:13] Mayor Garcia presented a letter of
[25:14] appointment to Kevin Ray, 52nd Ave., to
[25:17] serve on the district commission. You will
[25:19] appoint Mr. King to replace
[25:22] Mr. Stefan Fe and complete the remainder
[25:24] of his term, which expires on
[25:26] Jubilee 1, 2028. Send to public service for
[25:29] seconds. Everyone in favor. I. Anyone up for it
[25:31] ?
[25:36] And it will be on April 9. Okay. I just
[25:41] wanted to let the public know. It will be
[25:43] on April 9th,
[25:46] and we will also take
[25:51] everyone's approval.
[25:54] Alon
[25:58] Seven is also an appointment
[26:01] by Mr. R 52 to serve the historical commission.
[26:07] He will replace Ms. Rodriguez and
[26:11] complete the recourse.
[26:15] We discussed that for a minute. No
[26:17] problem.
[26:20] Let's make a motion to receive, and that's
[26:24] under discussion.
[26:26] How much do we have? Second under discussion.
[26:29] Third, go up.
[26:32] As I understand it right now, the
[26:36] historical commission has not been able to make any
[26:39] decision. They had been having several problems for a while
[26:45] ,
[26:50] so they had been singing for so long and
[26:52] couldn't find anyone. I know that
[26:55] our usual protocol is to forward the
[26:57] package to
[26:59] a public service,
[27:02] but in this case I would like the information
[27:05] at least,
[27:07] maybe not for local, but maybe
[27:10] for the other appointment tonight.
[27:14] Lift with your hand. I honestly
[27:18] disagree.
[27:19] I prefer to send him to the public service.
[27:22] Okay, fine. Let the
[27:25] body decide
[27:29] if they want to do that. That's why
[27:31] accepting the
[27:35] late one is similar. There's
[27:42] some other discussion going on.
[27:46] Thank you. Through the president
[27:49] of the public services department, there is some
[27:53] possibility of an
[27:54] earlier meeting. The only reason they're
[27:55] asking is because we're waiting on all
[27:58] the CPA projects; we can't
[28:01] move forward until the
[28:03] historical commission can meet and do the work they
[28:05] need to do.
[28:07] that we are, uh, in a
[28:11] waiting period.
[28:12] I can suggest that the six who bought it
[28:15] could try it out
[28:18] with a copy for public service so
[28:21] that people can come. I
[28:26] just made it up, but I don't know.
[28:30] Councilor Renici,
[28:34] we can put up
[28:36] temporary signage until we code it under
[28:38] public utilities to follow. I do
[28:42] n't think we can make
[28:44] temporary signage, but
[28:47] I think cones would be a good suggestion
[28:49] .
[28:52] Mr. President,
[28:54] I support your idea that we approve the
[28:56] pending signage indicating
[28:59] that
[29:04] the appointee will come to
[29:06] the interview and continue the
[29:08] process. Thank you.
[29:11] Okay, but Conheimer, those are
[29:15] leaning because the head of the committee just
[29:19] told us, he would like it to
[29:21] go to public services. I think it's
[29:23] important to listen to the president and
[29:27] follow the procedure. Thank you,
[29:30] Concelo Sulión.
[29:33] So that everyone understands my
[29:34] suggestion.
[29:38] We have two signs for two
[29:40] different commissions and it's the same
[29:42] person, so he's going to come to the
[29:44] public services office for the
[29:47] district commission. We're not going to
[29:51] try to approve that tonight. It's just
[29:53] the one from the historical commission where it's
[29:56] next to all the things that are being
[29:58] held up, SPA and the
[30:00] demolition permits and the things that are
[30:02] being stopped.
[30:04] Penich Council.
[30:08] I'd like to make a legal point here.
[30:13] Once we confirm someone,
[30:18] we can do the interview later,
[30:20] but we have confirmed
[30:22] and done it without the information before
[30:26] doing the public service hearing
[30:27] . I'm neutral on that, but
[30:30] considering the discussion I just wanted to
[30:33] point it out.
[30:38] Okay. Its
[30:42] final point.
[30:45] Uh, I've been, I've been for 13 months
[30:50] someone who left,
[30:53] counselor Gramsm. Yes, thank you, Madam
[30:55] President.
[30:57] Finally, I don't understand why the
[30:58] entire council is involved in the process
[31:02] that's happening, but we
[31:04] 're also using an ordinance to
[31:06] combine the
[31:10] historical commission and the local historical commission
[31:15] in the coming months.
[31:19] So I hear the arguments
[31:22] about wanting to follow the processes,
[31:25] but I also understand that
[31:27] somehow there is room to
[31:30] move things forward while
[31:33] we are in a week
[31:36] starting that process to reform
[31:39] this group. So thank you.
[31:44] I don't know, but I think they
[31:46] called me; I think it was this afternoon that
[31:49] the mayor reappointed someone else as
[31:52] historical commissioner. Yes, that's
[31:54] correct.
[31:55] Uh, I wouldn't have accepted it if I hadn't been
[31:59] under the impression that it had to
[32:00] happen quickly and I would
[32:03] have just waited for the
[32:05] next meeting, but that was the only
[32:08] reason why I accepted that
[32:14] article, but if you want to send it to
[32:16] public safety and wait I
[32:19] need it in front of me.
[32:22] Yes,
[32:25] as long as she comes before me,
[32:28] before us. Yes, I understand.
[32:34] Okay. So I'm going to entertain
[32:38] a commandment to that emotion in order
[32:42] to receive
[32:44] approval
[32:48] and send it to
[32:53] the public service for the
[32:57] property interview.
[32:58] Second.
[33:03] OK thanks.
[33:07] And ma'am
[33:09] and secretary, we need a
[33:11] call button for that.
[33:14] No, they don't need to.
[33:17] be clear, we are
[33:19] only voting for
[33:22] Article 7 and we are sending it to
[33:26] committee. Okay,
[33:28] so everyone, do me a favor. If someone
[33:31] says no, it
[33:38] goes to the committee.
[33:43] Okay, on the next page,
[33:47] that
[33:49] lawyer from Massachusetts
[33:51] responded about an open
[33:56] motion meeting to receive.
[33:59] Everyone in favor. Does anyone object?
[34:03] Okay, that won't get us anywhere. So
[34:06] the one from the fire commissioner's board is new
[34:08] .
[34:10] Motion of the meeting of 21, motion to
[34:13] receive. Everyone in favor. Already. Anyone up for it?
[34:17] Article 10
[34:19] is from Alicia Seller's
[34:23] committee development. A request to reschedule
[34:26] the CDGB fund from 2025 and the recommendation
[34:30] for 2026.
[34:34] That's where we're also going to
[34:36] see on the agenda to vote on
[34:39] Article
[34:41] 30 and something,
[34:44] which is the recommendation.
[34:55] I believe that's for receiving a 10.
[35:01] And if one of the articles is
[35:05] the DGR recommendation, then
[35:08] that has to go to DGR.
[35:11] So that needs to be done; that article 10
[35:14] has to go to DGR. Yes, because that's
[35:18] a program 10 request, it has to go
[35:21] to DGR. Concept for receiving and sending to
[35:24] DGR. Conaker, everyone's in favor. Anyone up for it
[35:28] ?
[35:31] Okay.
[35:34] Aici seller eh como de desarrollo de
[35:37] clarificación de opier y el el
[35:43] resultado que nosotros tuvo eh de
[35:46] orden, moción para recibir y enviar a
[35:49] finanzas, el acuerdo de ops.
[35:59] Okay. The OBT funds agreement
[36:01] . Do you want it sent to DGR for the
[36:04] next meeting or do you want it funded?
[36:08] The IPO agreement will be discussed at
[36:11] the next DGR meeting.
[36:15] DGR. Send it to DGR.
[36:18] Second. Thank you.
[36:21] Everyone in favor. I, someone, get on board.
[36:25] Okay. Article 12
[36:27] is the
[36:32] July that does not and the industrial corporation
[36:35] of minutes of the meetings of
[36:37] November 20, 2025. Promotion has been made
[36:40] to receive someone all, someone
[36:42] puts. Three is the minute
[36:48] of the Development authority meeting
[36:52] all in favor. Someone gets involved, so
[36:55] we move and have our
[36:57] requests. The first is 14 requests
[37:01] from River Cannibal LRS for
[37:04] marijuana establishment in a
[37:05] first aircraft to send
[37:08] second orders. Everyone in favor. Does anyone
[37:10] object?
[37:13] 15 goes to finance, so request from
[37:17] Jonathan Nieves Vidov for
[37:21] Liberty transportation services at 131 Walter
[37:23] Street. I have to see that before I
[37:27] had to see our rules
[37:29] for receiving and sending finances. Everyone
[37:32] in favor. Someone gets on board. And then 16 is
[37:37] the request
[37:40] of
[37:42] the white blow eh in 106 20 high stream
[37:46] to rebuild non-conforming structure
[37:49] in order to rebuild two
[37:51] exterior exit staircases
[37:54] send the DGR.
[37:56] Okay. Motion for DGR. Everyone in favor.
[38:00] Anyone up for it?
[38:03] Okay, let's move.
[38:05] The report from committee 17, the committee that
[38:10] issued an order and the
[38:13] order department that
[38:18] revived the definition of monalized
[38:23] in chapter 86 and recommended that the
[38:25] order be sued. Councilor, thank you.
[38:26] very much, Mr. President. In the
[38:30] public education committee there was quite a bit of
[38:33] discussion and we were looking
[38:35] to see if there were any changes and
[38:37] indeed what we decided
[38:39] was to move forward. Just
[38:41] by making it clear that it was
[38:43] aligned as the state language, so you
[38:45] can also see 17 in your package.
[38:49] All it does is amend the
[38:51] last sentence, removing
[38:54] the period after the sentence and
[38:57] after it says, including those below
[39:00] chapter 90, session one, as it simply
[39:06] means that we don't need to increase
[39:08] our definition; it always has to be
[39:09] used and
[39:12] aligned with the language of
[39:13] serious information to accept the report and to
[39:17] adapt
[39:19] the report of the committee. So
[39:22] thank you, Councillor Grasme.
[39:25] So the motion was to
[39:29] receive and adapt the committee's report
[39:31] and you said to pass the first one.
[39:35] Yes. And pass the first one. Yes.
[39:40] Second.
[39:42] Thank you. I heard there must be another
[39:44] discussion about this.
[39:47] Okay. So the motion was to pass the
[39:50] first reading. Everyone in favor. Come is
[39:53] supposed to be
[39:55] for the second reading.
[39:57] To get through the second reading. So,
[39:59] please me. It puts an option to pass the
[40:04] orderly pass.
[40:08] The secretariat will call her if they
[40:10] vote to adapt article 17.
[40:14] Yes, Pet yes,
[40:30] Israel Rivera, yes. Jenny Rivera, yes.
[40:34] Selv, yes. To Herman, yes. Yes, that's right.
[40:40] Anderson Berger, yes.
[40:42] unanimous vote.
[40:44] Okay. And with that past and 17
[40:48] now article 18 the committee in ordinance
[40:52] which was referred an ordinance for
[40:54] the committee to review an ordinance on
[40:56] vehicle repairs of streets in
[40:58] the city of residential driveways,
[41:00] particularly the changes made
[41:02] some years ago that allow certain
[41:04] repairs on public roads. This is
[41:07] recommended so that that order is still fulfilled
[41:09] with me. So,
[41:11] the Olino committee
[41:16] discussed only the
[41:19] repairs to the city streets,
[41:23] but in fact,
[41:26] the thing we were talking about is
[41:28] that there are some quick repairs that
[41:32] are specified, they are not allowed, like
[41:36] changing a window when
[41:39] someone comes to the committee, when someone
[41:42] sees that so they could have seen it
[41:46] again, but it's very misleading because there are
[41:49] quite a few people who
[41:51] rent and I don't have a place where I
[41:53] can get a window
[41:59] repaired.
[42:02] So if you have someone who needs
[42:04] someone to explain my ordination to you, they can't do it for you
[42:07] . But if that's
[42:09] where the street is, then where's it
[42:10] going to be fixed? If you don't have a place
[42:12] like a parking lot to make it
[42:16] private and something, so to
[42:18] see, but as we discussed in
[42:20] committee there was no answer either, so
[42:23] allowing
[42:27] vehicle service to potentially
[42:30] block traffic,
[42:32] including the safety of that
[42:35] person and the fact that companies
[42:38] have to specify that there are things they
[42:41] have to do and that this company
[42:44] simply isn't going to do it and be on the
[42:46] street, well, we talked about how that
[42:49] is a problem, but
[42:50] we also didn't have any
[42:53] easy answer for that, so we decided that it
[42:55] might make more sense for another one
[42:57] or that it be done specifically because
[43:01] we were focused on
[43:04] city property if we want to see that and I tried
[43:06] to find a middle ground there, but it
[43:08] seems that the OL as I was written was already
[43:11] complete, so the motion is
[43:13] to accept the committee report.
[43:16] Any other discussion
[43:19] and nothing.
[43:22] A motion for the order to have been
[43:24] carried out. Everything is in our favor. Does anyone
[43:25] object?
[43:27] So I don't see myself anymore. 19. such as the one that
[43:30] allows ordering in which an order is sent,
[43:33] eh in which an order is sent
[43:36] requested from several
[43:38] business owners to update the sale, it is to be
[43:41] gratified, eh in order to transfer
[43:44] responsibility, eh from the enforcement of
[43:46] the police department instead
[43:48] of the owners, or order the
[43:51] properties, buildings, eh warnings
[43:54] with a specific grace period,
[43:57] eh for before,
[44:01] and
[44:05] the person is already eh being
[44:09] allowed 14 days instead of 7 days.
[44:12] That was a good conversation about the
[44:15] policies and what some
[44:19] business owners are facing, wasn't it?
[44:20] What we focus on is that there
[44:22] are two sessions in that line of credit and that there
[44:25] are two PAS that can also follow a
[44:29] $300 fund
[44:32] and can also
[44:35] follow a fine and a communication
[44:39] from the board and we are
[44:41] going to look for the least aggressive step and we are
[44:45] only going to use that more
[44:47] aggressive step when we haven't had any, it
[44:50] 's consistently or something that has been
[44:54] a problem frequently or they are not
[44:56] responding and the other thing is that
[44:58] we only use the mail and that
[45:00] speaks to a scenario in which
[45:03] the mail is no longer local and it
[45:05] will possibly take longer to
[45:09] reach the final destination because it goes to Harf
[45:12] and then comes to Streamf then Hol. So
[45:16] we're talking about a
[45:18] suggestion from the health director that they
[45:21] can now make it a formal policy instead
[45:24] of giving the person 7 days, to give them
[45:26] 14 days. Seeing that currently during
[45:29] the process someone is possibly going to
[45:32] get and possibly can be
[45:34] marked 5 days ago. Now they have two
[45:37] days to respond and possibly they can't
[45:39] respond in two days, so I
[45:41] think it's uh 14 days
[45:46] in a better way and it looks like they
[45:50] want to do the best way, so the
[45:53] excitement is that the fact is fulfilled.
[45:56] Thank you for being with me.
[46:02] So even though I understand
[46:04] that everyone believes the order
[46:06] will be fulfilled, I believe it will be
[46:09] because the city of Joli is indeed
[46:12] going to the business owner. Exact.
[46:17] The city property that they have, uh,
[46:22] full walls,
[46:25] the bridges, and someone who's going to bring
[46:29] us, we're going to the taxpayers
[46:31] .
[46:33] So the property is covered in
[46:35] graffiti,
[46:37] but nothing has happened,
[46:41] we're just passing by and we're
[46:45] going to give the
[46:47] owner, the owner of the place, a benevolent gift. Did anyone
[46:51] warn me about
[46:56] the graffiti? I
[46:59] hope no one will come after me. I didn't
[47:01] mention Mir, but he's talking about
[47:04] graffiti.
[47:08] I don't see any remains. Anyone else? Has
[47:11] anyone seen him do that? It's like
[47:14] the age of teeth coming in at
[47:17] night, well, that's it
[47:19] . I see another discussion.
[47:24] Okay. It has been fulfilled
[47:28] and the communication is sent to
[47:31] the one who
[47:35] favors someone who opposes it so move it.
[47:37] Article 20 is the ordinance committee to
[47:40] which an order has been referred that
[47:46] is added to the
[47:48] sanctioning ordinance regarding
[47:50] after-work violations or points where
[47:56] they recommend that the order.
[47:59] One so we already know
[48:03] we all have it
[48:06] and I only have the time. We
[48:08] cannot act on that because we
[48:09] have already passed the point
[48:12] that if the perpetrators want to
[48:14] subdue us, they can, but at this point
[48:16] we have to remove it. So
[48:18] thank you.
[48:20] That was the
[48:22] motion to remove it, and now there's
[48:26] another discussion.
[48:29] Seeing nothing,
[48:32] so I don't pee 21
[48:35] and it begins
[48:39] that the order is removed
[48:43] and that the projects of any
[48:46] information and recovery and it is
[48:49] recommended that the order be to uh
[48:51] take classes, Mr. President, the same
[48:53] situation and the order uh uh so
[48:58] that uh pass that.
[49:02] Second. Anyone else?
[49:05] Emotion to bring everyone out in favor. I'm wondering
[49:09] if we can
[49:11] take 22 up to 25 as a package. It is
[49:16] to suspend the rules to take
[49:18] article 22, 23 and 25 as a
[49:21] motion package to suspend the rules. Everyone
[49:23] in favor. Does anyone object?
[49:26] So I'm going to read it quickly.
[49:30] Many of them are recommended to be
[49:32] removed. 22
[49:36] commits ordinance, which was referred to
[49:38] the order that the pieces in home be
[49:42] spoken.
[49:43] It's uh the
[49:45] one in the middle of the block homeset2
[49:50] of 23
[49:52] was an order that the
[49:54] city engineer look at the visibility
[49:57] over
[50:00] uh the sidewalk approaching HCC
[50:05] and 24 is that the city councilor
[50:09] refers one that the council have a
[50:13] new crossing and 25 and the ordinance that
[50:18] the city engineer review the uh
[50:21] the parking situation on
[50:22] West
[50:25] Glen Street and all those that it was
[50:29] recommended that the order be taken out, so
[50:32] thank you.
[50:34] So this was added to remove him
[50:38] as councilor. They were all able to communicate
[50:42] to the committee that they are directed towards
[50:47] public education and as it turns out,
[50:50] we are going to remove him.
[50:53] Second.
[50:55] Okay. Emoción has become second to
[50:57] bring out any other species.
[51:02] Okay, not seeing any excitement. Everyone
[51:04] in favor.
[51:06] Anyone up for it? So we don't see each other.
[51:11] 25. Thank you. Ordinances.
[51:15] Finance 26. The finance committee which
[51:19] referred to an order that the city
[51:23] councillor of the city received eh 000
[51:27] in return for culture, district and
[51:31] investments and it was recommended that the
[51:33] order be adapted councillor
[51:38] to pass the first reading or that
[51:40] after second
[51:43] has
[51:44] to pass the first reading. My motion has been
[51:47] made and seconded,
[51:50] and if there was discussion with Iván,
[51:53] this Fen Colón was there the other night
[51:56] when we had this meeting, and
[51:59] what the incentive is, which is not, was not
[52:02] an incentive that will be used for
[52:04] culture, the district of Puerto Rico, and
[52:08] Celina's trip, and I fund it to
[52:11] support small businesses and the
[52:14] best with other incentives. to
[52:16] help with the residents,
[52:19] with the
[52:22] recent brochures and that's the reason why
[52:24] this incentive is there
[52:29] and yes the motion has been made however
[52:30] to pass the first reading to
[52:32] any further discussion
[52:35] in favor. Me, does anyone object? Motion
[52:38] to proceed to the second reading. Mo to
[52:41] move on to the second reading. The
[52:43] secretary is going to call the rules and vote that they were
[52:45] voting to vote on article 26. Divine
[52:52] sim
[52:56] or she has just left the room.
[52:58] BCN
[53:06] Isabel Rivera, yes. Jenis Rivera, yes.
[53:13] Bak by Andersenberger. Yes.
[53:18] So, yes, a vote was cast, and with that, the
[53:21] 26th
[53:23] and 27th passed. It was the finance committee which gave
[53:26] an indication that there is a
[53:29] transfer of 50,000 as follows for the
[53:33] stabilization of
[53:36] legal fees for prosecutors. It is recommended that
[53:38] the order be adapted to Councillor Ivan
[53:41] without a motion to pass the first
[53:42] reading. The motion is to pass the first
[53:45] reading under the table.
[53:50] We're having a
[53:51] finance meeting and possibly two to three
[53:53] minutes after the start of finance
[53:57] we had information
[54:00] from TJ about some of the things that are
[54:04] coming and one of the things he
[54:06] said is a transfer of
[54:10] cannabis stabilization
[54:12] funds and services that are going to be
[54:15] paid for KPL law services
[54:19] and they are experts on this issue and as a
[54:22] councilman it may be work to pass on
[54:26] the city's community charges
[54:29] for capillary services
[54:33] and that it was on the issue of
[54:39] municipal laws
[54:43] now
[54:46] and right now has more funds for
[54:49] this department to
[54:52] make the transfer.
[54:59] Okay, thanks councilman. Does
[55:02] anyone else have anything to add?
[55:04] Advice.
[55:07] Mr. President. I am absolutely going to
[55:09] do it quickly because I don't want to
[55:11] create a new committee, but I
[55:13] just want to keep saying in
[55:16] public resources
[55:18] that there are quite a few people I don't
[55:19] understand. The city is no longer charging fees imposed
[55:21] because
[55:24] after the fines were
[55:27] collected. Businesses started
[55:29] talking about how we weren't
[55:31] legally allowed to address those impacts, and they
[55:34] started suing the city and
[55:37] winning. It's quite
[55:39] complicated at this point; they've given a
[55:42] lot of the money they've connected.
[55:45] Some of Hollyw has been in a good
[55:47] position currently,
[55:50] and the department is doing a lot of work.
[55:52] There's a reason why
[55:56] we're working with KPL,
[55:59] knowing legally what we
[56:03] have to do. But it's
[56:04] important to understand
[56:06] that we're no longer collecting public park fees
[56:08] from their businesses. So
[56:11] yes,
[56:13] those are good businesses on the seventh floor
[56:15] that are paying taxes, and
[56:18] we get a portion of the
[56:21] taxes that come with that project.
[56:24] That kind of thing. Besides
[56:28] the forms,
[56:32] that's what happened for the city.
[56:34] We were able to try to bring in the
[56:37] funds, but it's not like the impacts
[56:39] we're bringing, which
[56:42] unfortunately... that already happened a
[56:44] few years ago; it's in the process, it's
[56:46] not happening anymore. So I just
[56:48] want to keep saying that until members
[56:50] of the public understand that, because
[56:52] we keep
[56:54] asking, where is that money? We do
[56:59] n't understand why we're using the
[57:01] background to direct the g that's happening, that's why
[57:05] .
[57:08] Thank you. and carries one hand. Councilman
[57:09] Rivera.
[57:11] Yes, Councilor Rivera understands all that and
[57:15] doesn't speak against it. I
[57:18] tell him where that money is and I'll
[57:20] end with that. Thanks
[57:26] beacon.
[57:29] So I'm going to be quick and
[57:30] just say that
[57:33] the cow is no longer
[57:38] doing the cow thing, and that was
[57:41] a big topic, and that's why we're going to keep
[57:46] hearing from the public about this.
[57:48] Thank you.
[57:52] And there being no other provision. The
[57:54] motion was to pass the first
[57:56] reading. Everyone in favor. Motion to
[57:58] proceed to the second reading.
[58:01] Anyone up for it? Okay.
[58:04] The motion was to proceed to
[58:07] the second reading. If you
[58:10] vote yes, vote to vote 27
[58:14] and yes.
[58:31] Isel Rivera.
[58:33] Jen Rivera,
[58:39] yes
[58:43] unanimously.
[58:47] Unanimous vote there. And that's what happened,
[58:53] Madam President, we
[58:55] can take 28 and 29 as a
[58:59] package.
[59:01] The other one, I don't know when we had another
[59:04] motion, was the rule to take articles
[59:08] 28 and 29 as a package, all in favor.
[59:12] Anyone up for it?
[59:16] During our user, we
[59:19] were allowed to have two of these items and
[59:22] that's what happened,
[59:24] both are going for unemployment compensation,
[59:29] there's another discussion,
[59:32] so I'm going to have a motion to pass
[59:35] the second reading. Can't
[59:38] .
[59:41] We're going to be the first ones to do this.
[59:49] I think we can discuss this
[59:51] instead of just taking a button or object
[59:55] there in this article.
[1:00:00] So I'm going to have a motion. We're going to
[1:00:03] do 28 first because we need to
[1:00:05] have votes to read it to the record because we have
[1:00:08] n't had the time to
[1:00:10] read your article. 28
[1:00:13] is the finance committee, which has
[1:00:14] one that refers to us
[1:00:17] transferring $18,000 250
[1:00:21] from patrol pay to
[1:00:25] compensation.
[1:00:27] After the first reading. The
[1:00:32] motion to pass the second reading is opposed.
[1:00:34] Okay. The motion has been made to proceed to the
[1:00:37] second reading. The secretary will
[1:00:39] call roll if you vote. Yes, you
[1:00:40] vote on item 28.
[1:00:44] Grannym
[1:00:54] síel
[1:01:07] Rivera. Yes, yes,
[1:01:15] Anders
[1:01:23] unanimous vote.
[1:01:27] 29 for the 29th
[1:01:32] take point 29 second.
[1:01:36] What happens on the first reading?
[1:01:40] I'll do it one of those days.
[1:01:45] Any other arguments
[1:01:48] in favor? Anyone up for it?
[1:01:52] Pass the second reading. Motion to
[1:01:55] proceed to the second reading by the
[1:01:56] secretary: whether to vote yes for
[1:01:58] item 29.
[1:02:02] Yes.
[1:02:16] Israel.
[1:02:29] Thanks, it happened on the 29th. I
[1:02:32] have a note here and I think they're talking about
[1:02:35] point 30.
[1:02:38] Motion to send it back to the
[1:02:40] auditor.
[1:02:43] First, the finance committee
[1:02:45] refers to the order that there be a
[1:02:48] transfer of 56
[1:02:51] 5500
[1:02:52] as follows
[1:02:54] to pay for the existence of CPO to
[1:02:57] pay the profit from the collection of
[1:03:00] the payroll specialist,
[1:03:03] treasurer, auditor who recommends that the
[1:03:05] auditor advisor be returned.
[1:03:10] That was the suggestion.
[1:03:14] The finance committee because we had
[1:03:16] some questions about the trip outside,
[1:03:20] so we wanted to take care of the
[1:03:22] first floor,
[1:03:24] but not the
[1:03:26] trip outside zero and there's another
[1:03:28] order, I think there's
[1:03:32] more discussion coming, I
[1:03:37] think that's 661.
[1:03:43] The rule and take 60 61.
[1:03:48] We're going to make 6 safe,
[1:03:51] but we're going to have to use then
[1:03:53] so
[1:03:56] we can see with 31 because the
[1:03:59] excitement to return is gone. Is
[1:04:02] there any discussion about that? He does
[1:04:05] n't see any. Everyone in favor.
[1:04:09] Someone is already objecting.
[1:04:12] And the motion was made to suspend the
[1:04:14] rules
[1:04:16] and take 70 61
[1:04:21] as a package.
[1:04:24] Uh, 60. I'm considering a
[1:04:27] transfer request of $21,000 to pay the
[1:04:30] 60 FPO for
[1:04:34] out-of-state travel, and the
[1:04:37] Venezuelan conservator requested a transfer of $34,800
[1:04:41] to pay the assistant CPO to pay
[1:04:45] the earnings collection, the
[1:04:49] specialized payroll treasurer
[1:04:50] auditor, to take points. 60. I
[1:04:55] 'm not sure.
[1:04:57] Leon suddenly realized he
[1:05:03] could handle that.
[1:05:08] is the decision I voted against
[1:05:11] in the first one we took up with the auditor. That's what
[1:05:16] we would like to see him return to the
[1:05:18] committee.
[1:05:20] I had a few arguments just about that
[1:05:23] .
[1:05:25] The out-of-state trip is a
[1:05:28] conference at a Las Vegas hotel,
[1:05:31] but it sounds like
[1:05:34] a place to have a good
[1:05:36] conference is not unusual in this field,
[1:05:39] but it has to do with Munis and the
[1:05:42] company
[1:05:44] that they do it abnormally and
[1:05:48] we had a group of people who
[1:05:51] went and the results
[1:05:55] and benefits of this.
[1:05:58] We would like to hear from you, so we
[1:06:01] inform people in
[1:06:03] any way possible, and for me the
[1:06:06] most serious question is if we are not going to
[1:06:09] spend $21,000 to send a
[1:06:12] team of people to
[1:06:14] the Tyler
[1:06:21] ERP company. They have offices
[1:06:24] in Albany, New York,
[1:06:31] New Hampshire, Providence,
[1:06:34] Harford, Connecticut, so it
[1:06:36] might cost a little more. I don't know
[1:06:38] how much more they
[1:06:41] could have here so that more
[1:06:42] people can train.
[1:06:45] I think it's worth doing a
[1:06:48] deeper forest. It makes sense to take a
[1:06:50] second to send the song to the 60 committee,
[1:06:57] please, if
[1:06:59] anyone objects, so let's continue.
[1:07:02] So, 61st
[1:07:05] motion to pass the first reading.
[1:07:08] Mo sech to pass the first reading
[1:07:12] was on Zoom and I can no longer break if I
[1:07:15] was here.
[1:07:17] He talked about that and also
[1:07:21] gave us information 5 minutes before
[1:07:23] our meeting.
[1:07:29] He also decided to transfer funds
[1:07:32] from the off-SA budget so that
[1:07:36] employees could attend the
[1:07:39] Tyler Conference 2026, and I believe it
[1:07:42] was April 7th and April 10th. This is a
[1:07:44] 4-day conference that includes
[1:07:48] several days of working sessions
[1:07:50] related to Tyler RP Municis and
[1:07:55] problem learning, and it leads
[1:07:57] Municis experts to the opportunity of
[1:08:00] books.
[1:08:02] This would be a question about point 60. Yes.
[1:08:07] Or he was talking about that. Sorry, I didn't
[1:08:09] mean to interrupt.
[1:08:12] That's what he told us. Five minutes
[1:08:15] before
[1:08:17] that, he went to have sex with me, just
[1:08:22] to talk a little bit more than 61.
[1:08:24] Indeed, why did we take the
[1:08:26] money, the funds from the assistant
[1:08:31] prosecutor's office? It's because
[1:08:34] the role of our current budget
[1:08:40] is
[1:08:45] that, uh, then it's 34,800
[1:08:48] to the other girls
[1:08:51] and they didn't see me where they were edited.
[1:08:55] if we hire someone
[1:09:01] to supplement them at that new
[1:09:04] salary.
[1:09:08] So we're hiring in Elogrado.
[1:09:12] Suddenly we're going to have a [unclear - possibly "one
[1:09:15] depending on the experience"]
[1:09:18] to hire those children.
[1:09:22] So 17,100 will be moved
[1:09:25] to the specialist
[1:09:28] for the payment of R
[1:09:32] and 7200 to the treasurer's line and
[1:09:35] 6400 to the auditor's line.
[1:09:38] Thank you. Considered. Alma
[1:09:41] motion to proceed to first reading.
[1:09:43] Everyone in favor. Does anyone object?
[1:09:47] Motion to pass the second letter.
[1:09:48] Motion to proceed to the second reading.
[1:09:50] which secretary if it is voted like this or was voted
[1:09:54] for point 61
[1:09:59] grm
[1:10:03] Yes, yes, Israel Rivera, yes, Rivera, yes,
[1:10:17] Sullian, yes, yes
[1:10:20] ,
[1:10:21] No, it
[1:10:30] passed. I'm going
[1:10:34] back to
[1:10:37] the 31st.
[1:10:44] is the finance committee where a
[1:10:47] referred order for an
[1:10:50] outside auditor request to provide a
[1:10:51] status update for 2023-2024
[1:10:54] in person or in writing as soon as possible. It is
[1:10:57] recommended that this order be compared
[1:11:01] motion to pass the first reading, it is not
[1:11:03] purchased with zero VAT, apparently
[1:11:07] speaking with heroic, that is why they
[1:11:10] already know
[1:11:12] that it has been fulfilled to
[1:11:20] know this.
[1:11:24] Thank you, Mr. President.
[1:11:27] Arch a subsequent order that I
[1:11:30] think is in the jacket. Thank you.
[1:11:33] The order
[1:11:35] recommends that it be complied with. Everyone in
[1:11:38] favor. Does
[1:11:40] anyone object?
[1:11:43] 32. It is the finance committee that refers to
[1:11:46] an order.
[1:11:48] Should I take that one at 33 or not?
[1:11:54] I am referring to an order to the
[1:11:57] police department to explain how
[1:12:03] the bills are paid at the request of the council, so that
[1:12:06] some information can be shared with
[1:12:07] the office.
[1:12:10] D a cash transfer.
[1:12:13] I recommended that the order be carried out.
[1:12:17] Something to add, like that
[1:12:20] was for the advice,
[1:12:24] something I want to add
[1:12:28] because I want to add that this is
[1:12:30] filed,
[1:12:32] that starting the state
[1:12:37] makes the problem be solved.
[1:12:43] Everything has been done in our favor. Does anyone
[1:12:44] object?
[1:12:46] After 33, the finance committee
[1:12:49] referred to an order and other officials
[1:12:52] in the DLS letters of 922 and 25 and
[1:12:59] October 10, 2025 prohibited a
[1:13:02] report from the city council of the
[1:13:05] state.
[1:13:07] It is recommended that the order be carried out. I
[1:13:10] agree that something is the same with and to know
[1:13:19] Mr. President,
[1:13:21] this order to resolve for the
[1:13:27] letter under 50 of the state and the activity
[1:13:29] that is happening right now
[1:13:33] is in control, the contract wants
[1:13:36] to recognize our stories. Thank you.
[1:13:39] So that people know
[1:13:42] having those meetings
[1:13:45] and we didn't have one last week,
[1:13:48] so I have a space we have
[1:13:51] that has been fulfilled. Everyone's in
[1:13:53] favor,
[1:13:56] so let's continue. Thanks to finance.
[1:14:02] of relationships. Point 34
[1:14:05] the committee in relations
[1:14:08] referred to a special permit
[1:14:10] for a mental station in front of his
[1:14:14] house a permit for parked on the 17
[1:14:19] Martin Avenir recommendation that was
[1:14:21] granted with people. Thank you. That's
[1:14:25] my first date, I'm taking a
[1:14:30] present, thanks to those who
[1:14:32] helped me, and now I'm back here because of
[1:14:34] the NIV.
[1:14:36] The applicant arrived for the meeting and
[1:14:40] also went up
[1:14:45] and
[1:14:48] with the letter and
[1:14:53] the appropriate documentation,
[1:14:56] so we are encouraged to approve the
[1:14:58] special permit.
[1:15:02] Any other suggestions?
[1:15:05] I see another hand. Penich. Yes, Mr.
[1:15:08] President.
[1:15:10] This is precisely, uh, totally, uh,
[1:15:15] a procedural question.
[1:15:18] This is the first special permit we have
[1:15:21] made and under 9.3 of the
[1:15:25] SONEN ordinance that the
[1:15:28] special permit government provides that
[1:15:30] special permits must be granted by the
[1:15:33] authority unless
[1:15:36] otherwise specified in writing
[1:15:39] indeterminate to benefit the
[1:15:40] city or neighborhood
[1:15:43] taking into account the characteristics of the size and
[1:15:47] the proposal
[1:15:49] in addition to other
[1:15:52] specific matters.
[1:15:54] For consideration, the following can be
[1:16:00] resolved in proposal
[1:16:02] two: security
[1:16:05] 13
[1:16:07] eh adequacy of utilities and other
[1:16:10] public services of the neighborhood and
[1:16:13] social and
[1:16:15] structural characteristics. Five, impacts on the
[1:16:19] natural environment, six, potential
[1:16:22] fiscal impact, including impact on
[1:16:24] services, taxes and employees.
[1:16:28] We need to do that
[1:16:30] written ending. It's a good
[1:16:32] proportion, she
[1:16:34] 's happy to vote
[1:16:37] and I don't know how
[1:16:40] fast the practices have been that
[1:16:44] we gave a special permit.
[1:16:46] Where does Jeffre work this out with the
[1:16:49] committee chair, or whether we
[1:16:52] should have voted on any of these
[1:16:54] things when we granted a
[1:16:56] special permit, or if they are voted on now? I don't know, and I
[1:17:00] should bring it tonight. Thanks
[1:17:04] for my experience. When yesterday I was the
[1:17:06] president of R
[1:17:09] when we voted on a special permit
[1:17:12] it was with the understanding that the
[1:17:13] permit we are following in that
[1:17:15] section
[1:17:19] that we agree with those
[1:17:22] particular
[1:17:26] things in mind. However, I do
[1:17:34] n't know if the lawyer... I'm not sure, I
[1:17:38] 'm not sure. I don't
[1:17:40] know which one, I'm not clear on what
[1:17:44] you want to do,
[1:17:48] so I'm not sure.
[1:17:51] The legal department wants to
[1:17:54] mention it, but I think it was Manuel
[1:17:56] . Well, I was already there, not
[1:17:58] only to answer the question again,
[1:18:01] but just to bring up a fact that in
[1:18:05] the public hearing we
[1:18:06] asked for comments
[1:18:09] from the committee, I wanted to add that.
[1:18:13] Okay, no problem.
[1:18:17] I would be very happy if
[1:18:20] the lawyer could give us power, so that we could
[1:18:22] go through
[1:18:24] the process that
[1:18:28] other authorities have looked at,
[1:18:31] just to have a
[1:18:36] basis for what happens with this. Okay, it didn't happen
[1:18:39] to me the other time.
[1:18:42] This was the moment that was going to bring him
[1:18:43] now.
[1:18:48] Attorney Beninet, would
[1:18:51] you like to be here? Welcome.
[1:18:54] Thank you, sir. Good evening
[1:18:55] everyone.
[1:18:57] Yes,
[1:19:01] polite. I consider Punish because of his
[1:19:05] experience in planning;
[1:19:09] he has a good understanding of the
[1:19:11] requirements.
[1:19:13] Generally,
[1:19:15] we have to hold specific meetings
[1:19:19] regarding opponents
[1:19:22] who pass special matters. What
[1:19:25] we receive the most is when we
[1:19:28] make special permits
[1:19:32] for
[1:19:34] cannabis companies,
[1:19:37] as long as
[1:19:40] this form and list we had for
[1:19:43] a special permit.
[1:19:46] There's one that's actually available
[1:19:49] for this particular one because I think there's
[1:19:51] the girl who went back to the DPW
[1:19:57] to see if the city council
[1:19:59] could look at a space
[1:20:03] on their lot out front,
[1:20:06] but we're already in
[1:20:08] compliance with that, so I'm not
[1:20:11] sure
[1:20:14] about looking at it. The
[1:20:17] special permit requirements here,
[1:20:22] at least, had to
[1:20:25] be with his front yard,
[1:20:29] but you're in a
[1:20:33] position to grant it to do those
[1:20:36] encounters, and usually it's up
[1:20:41] to the committee when they have to
[1:20:44] go with the cannabis permits,
[1:20:48] so that's taken before
[1:20:51] finding out
[1:20:58] in the determination to help that
[1:21:00] girl, our situation on his part.
[1:21:05] Thank you. So it sounds like you
[1:21:09] 're good to continue,
[1:21:12] but in the future
[1:21:14] that might be taken into account when
[1:21:17] we're voting for the committee, but it's not like we ca
[1:21:20] n't start.
[1:21:22] I'm hearing correctly tonight.
[1:21:25] Okay,
[1:21:27] I'll consider punishing man.
[1:21:30] If this is just to say that I can
[1:21:32] provide a
[1:21:36] guide for the committee. Okay,
[1:21:39] great.
[1:21:44] In the
[1:21:48] special motion that can be granted, so let's continue
[1:21:50] . Second,
[1:21:54] this is a call to action
[1:22:00] to adopt 34.
[1:22:03] Yes, Smith
[1:22:08] Biser
[1:22:12] Pinch. Yes. Cel Israel Rivera
[1:22:18] Jenny Rivera. Yes, Solido,
[1:22:22] Tamimer,
[1:22:24] Vi
[1:22:26] Anderson Brigos. Yes, unanimous vote.
[1:22:30] With vote,
[1:22:33] granted. Item 34 35 is the
[1:22:37] development and government and relations committee who
[1:22:39] referred the city council to
[1:22:42] invite the health board and the DGR to
[1:22:44] the meeting to discuss the
[1:22:46] building vacancy and recommended that the order has been
[1:22:49] complied with 0%.
[1:22:51] Yes, these members of the
[1:22:54] health will came and told us about the
[1:22:57] increased
[1:22:59] charges for the vacancies, which are from $3,000
[1:23:03] to
[1:23:05] $1000.
[1:23:07] The money that will be received that year
[1:23:10] for
[1:23:13] these forms is for the...
[1:23:19] And once the increases are seen,
[1:23:25] the owners of these buildings will go
[1:23:27] on a maintenance plan and that will be
[1:23:30] increased
[1:23:32] beforehand.
[1:23:34] The understanding
[1:23:36] is that this will increase
[1:23:39] for our buildings.
[1:23:42] They took the heart and started sending
[1:23:44] those maintenance plans,
[1:23:47] and they are trying to have their
[1:23:50] plans
[1:23:52] and the charge will be a 50% deduction,
[1:23:56] and they will look at the rehabilitation plans
[1:24:00] so that these buildings
[1:24:03] can be rehabilitated
[1:24:06] for more housing in our city. The number of
[1:24:09] vacant buildings
[1:24:12] is now 120. I
[1:24:18] 'm trying
[1:24:22] and it has calmed down
[1:24:26] to 120,000, it's
[1:24:29] also providing
[1:24:32] information integration. Who is
[1:24:35] signaling?
[1:24:38] to integrate all our
[1:24:42] projects
[1:24:44] and have everything in one place
[1:24:47] that is looking at properties. That's
[1:24:49] the main position coming up at the
[1:24:51] meeting, and Councilor Sullivan
[1:24:54] was a big part of this meeting, and I think he
[1:24:57] has some additional information,
[1:25:02] a notion
[1:25:04] that now you see
[1:25:06] here the building was worth
[1:25:09] 1.5 million and now it's worth 11.4 million,
[1:25:19] if you don't mind.
[1:25:22] Thank you, with all due respect, for your advice, Professor.
[1:25:30] Yes, we had a good update
[1:25:33] and we recommend that the order be
[1:25:35] fulfilled.
[1:25:38] We'll have to come back in a couple of
[1:25:39] months to discuss
[1:25:41] open times that move if
[1:25:43] a couple were inherited
[1:25:47] and how different
[1:25:50] departments handle that. So that
[1:25:52] already worked out, specifically.
[1:25:56] Uh, 111 Moiser uh came because there wasn't a
[1:26:01] position. It was
[1:26:04] removed, and the question was why it was
[1:26:07] removed and for what reason.
[1:26:09] We are waiting for answers on that.
[1:26:13] The same goes for Heart Plaza
[1:26:16] in another list of other buildings.
[1:26:19] The update was good, but we're
[1:26:21] looking ahead to the next couple of months.
[1:26:26] It's just a note
[1:26:29] that the treasurer's price, which isn't $6,000, is
[1:26:33] based
[1:26:35] on square footage,
[1:26:39] but it can be a higher number in
[1:26:40] some cases,
[1:26:42] especially in cases like Kor Play.
[1:26:46] That
[1:26:48] 's an example of what led to this whole
[1:26:51] conversation.
[1:26:54] Thanks for the advice. Does anyone else have
[1:26:55] anything to add?
[1:26:59] That he fulfilled all in his favor.
[1:27:02] Someone objects, so let's continue.
[1:27:07] 35, sorry, 36 is the
[1:27:11] development and
[1:27:13] government relations committee, who was recommended
[1:27:16] fiscal year 26, the
[1:27:20] Block Applications development community and it was recommended that
[1:27:23] the CD C is due to
[1:27:26] recommended locations to the house funds and
[1:27:28] notes
[1:27:31] with a great idea. Do
[1:27:35] not copy, but recommend that the committee
[1:27:39] go with the advisory committee,
[1:27:44] groups and recommendations. We had
[1:27:47] debates about dividing the money
[1:27:50] for different organizations.
[1:27:53] Israel Rivera spoke so that many
[1:27:57] people can get more, or a
[1:28:01] piece of the council,
[1:28:03] to continue with the citizens
[1:28:07] and the committee's recommendation, and
[1:28:09] then we'll go,
[1:28:12] and if anyone else on the committee wants to
[1:28:13] say something, please.
[1:28:16] Absolutely. Are
[1:28:20] there any other comments?
[1:28:25] at this point.
[1:28:30] Okay. We need a call
[1:28:32] ready for this because it is the
[1:28:36] recommendation that we
[1:28:38] are adopting
[1:28:42] the CDBG, the DGR recommendations
[1:28:47] and the funds of the resolution
[1:28:49] adopted. So we're calling the
[1:28:51] list. The secretary is going to call roll.
[1:28:53] If you vote this way, you are voting
[1:28:55] to adopt the
[1:28:57] report.
[1:29:00] Yes,
[1:29:13] C
[1:29:16] S C R
[1:29:20] J
[1:29:22] S
[1:29:28] Anders,
[1:29:32] a
[1:29:37] con, passes 56.
[1:29:43] Thank you, thank you to Pulson for making your
[1:29:47] first price. In other words, it is
[1:29:57] from the
[1:29:59] rules committee that the order for
[1:30:01] the legal department to review the
[1:30:04] previously adopted rules, especially
[1:30:06] the act, to identify the
[1:30:09] additional calculations, and ordered that the recent
[1:30:11] adoption in the modernization of the
[1:30:14] chosen act be complied with.
[1:30:16] Thank you.
[1:30:18] Uh, I consider bread. Thank you, Mr.
[1:30:20] President. If the adaptation of the bread that
[1:30:22] finally has left us
[1:30:25] with various things
[1:30:28] where it is really consistent. So
[1:30:31] we asked the lawyer to take a
[1:30:35] look and give us some
[1:30:39] advice. We really have a big
[1:30:41] package of which
[1:30:44] I have a couple of things, three of which
[1:30:46] were discussed on our agenda
[1:30:48] tonight. There are some others who
[1:30:52] raised interesting points,
[1:30:54] they stayed in the committee last night, but it didn't
[1:30:56] resolve anything, so they'll come back
[1:30:58] at a later point, but
[1:31:03] the review will be completed and the
[1:31:05] committee session will be held.
[1:31:07] Thank you. Is that
[1:31:13] another argument
[1:31:16] in the motion that has actually come to
[1:31:18] pass? Everyone's in favor, someone's against it
[1:31:21] ,
[1:31:23] so let's move on.
[1:31:28] Rules committee that the request comes to
[1:31:33] change the rule.
[1:31:36] Section 46 of July
[1:31:40] reflects the residence clause for
[1:31:42] ordinance. I recommend that the order be
[1:31:43] adopted with the
[1:31:45] gentleman present; it could be a
[1:31:49] point of order if, according to
[1:31:54] the points that were taken last night
[1:31:57] and sent to the council tonight,
[1:32:00] they were changed
[1:32:03] in a legal manner. I
[1:32:05] 'm looking at the pension under
[1:32:07] Rule
[1:32:09] 9 BG because the legal form was only proven
[1:32:13] tonight as the truck and I don't think
[1:32:16] the case had a chance to
[1:32:18] review it,
[1:32:20] so I think this should be
[1:32:24] appropriately the mass for
[1:32:25] people to
[1:32:27] review the legal form. They were indeed
[1:32:31] changed
[1:32:34] and can be reviewed after the
[1:32:35] meeting. That I find
[1:32:39] for a change later on because it
[1:32:43] eliminates the ability to fill this
[1:32:47] vacancy that I believe will occur in the
[1:32:50] treasurer on March 31, so there are a number
[1:32:52] of
[1:32:56] certain points to review that
[1:32:57] need to take place. Thank you.
[1:33:00] So,
[1:33:03] for a second
[1:33:07] the order point is noticeable,
[1:33:12] these cores, but we just got the separate parts
[1:33:18] today. It
[1:33:22] has a sense of security, but the hand of the councilman.
[1:33:28] Yes, I wanted to add it; basically,
[1:33:30] I wanted to reinforce what the council
[1:33:33] just said. I believe
[1:33:36] we haven't had 48 hours to
[1:33:40] legally review this,
[1:33:43] right?
[1:33:45] or not really to file a complaint, that's why
[1:33:48] people take the time.
[1:33:54] Thank you for raising this point. I do
[1:33:58] n't know what to have an emotion to
[1:34:01] put points 30 and
[1:34:06] 38, 39
[1:34:10] and 41. Yes, please, on the table.
[1:34:15] There is a second one.
[1:34:18] Everyone in favor. Does anyone object?
[1:34:23] Okay, we'll come back at the next
[1:34:24] meeting.
[1:34:26] All other committee
[1:34:29] reports remain with the committee, so that
[1:34:33] brings us motions, orders, and
[1:34:36] retractions as a reminder.
[1:34:39] We've at least voted on
[1:34:42] the things we needed to vote on in the
[1:34:45] chamber tonight, so we're just going to
[1:34:47] refer these to the committee for
[1:34:50] further discussion.
[1:34:52] 47
[1:34:56] orders that representatives from the DP and
[1:35:00] Jolio's emergency response team be a public safety committee member
[1:35:02] for a detailed presentation
[1:35:04] on the
[1:35:06] city's snow response protocols and a
[1:35:08] lessons learned analysis based on
[1:35:09] Jolio's response to the two
[1:35:11] most recent snow events.
[1:35:13] This analysis aims to
[1:35:15] inform and improve the council's public understanding
[1:35:17] of how technical waste removal is managed
[1:35:19] in the city. Two, to correct any possible
[1:35:22] misunderstandings. If there is any
[1:35:25] opportunity for a public exchange
[1:35:27] of information
[1:35:29] between the relevant municipal departments, the
[1:35:32] public and councilors, and the
[1:35:34] professional council and the
[1:35:36] public, the information and tools to
[1:35:38] be improved, allies of first responders
[1:35:40] and DPO professionals, send to
[1:35:43] public safety. Okay. Second,
[1:35:47] all in favor,
[1:35:52] so let's continue for 48 by the council
[1:35:53] ordering that council rule 8
[1:35:57] be amended to conform to the
[1:36:01] council's practice regarding the
[1:36:03] approval of amendments to said rules and
[1:36:06] further ordering that the council take steps to
[1:36:08] affirm that
[1:36:10] amendments to the rules adopted in the
[1:36:12] past do not comply with
[1:36:14] rule
[1:36:15] 8 as this rule is currently
[1:36:17] considered validly opt to send
[1:36:21] to the rules. Okay, so favor 49
[1:36:26] is by the council, it is ordered that
[1:36:28] sections 13 and 24 of the letter of ju be
[1:36:30] flooded as needed to
[1:36:33] adjust to any changes in
[1:36:34] section 22 and to establish that unless
[1:36:37] the letter or state law provides
[1:36:39] otherwise.
[1:36:42] The ordinance will be considered adopted
[1:36:44] by final action by a simple majority
[1:36:46] of all members of the
[1:36:48] municipal council by roll-call vote,
[1:36:50] registering
[1:36:53] the charters and rules. So, please me. Does
[1:36:57] anyone object?
[1:37:00] 50 The Rivera Council orders that the
[1:37:03] honorable municipal council issue a
[1:37:05] proclamation to the Goay wrestling team
[1:37:07] for winning the
[1:37:10] Division 3 West Wrestling Championship of the MIA and also
[1:37:14] grant individual proclamations to
[1:37:17] Santiago Jesus Morales and Parker Run in
[1:37:22] recognition of their
[1:37:23] individual championships in their respective
[1:37:25] divisions.
[1:37:29] We recommend that we take
[1:37:33] care of the
[1:37:37] zero.
[1:37:40] I recommend
[1:37:42] that the advice is
[1:37:44] Okay, thank you.
[1:37:48] Rivera alone. There is a name, eh,
[1:37:52] Santiago, that is the exact number
[1:37:55] of the student. I think I might have had to
[1:37:57] focus on the first
[1:37:59] name, but all the others are
[1:38:01] correct. Thank you all for supporting that.
[1:38:04] They really fought
[1:38:07] for the
[1:38:09] championship. I'm not sure about the
[1:38:13] outcome, but I'm going to be able to get it.
[1:38:17] Thank you. Could you look into a tip? Yes, we will.
[1:38:22] Thank you. I recommend that you receive
[1:38:25] that order. So, in favor, I am
[1:38:27] opposed.
[1:38:32] So let's continue to urge the
[1:38:33] Rivera Ordina council to have the
[1:38:37] honorable city council, in
[1:38:39] collaboration with the mayor, create a
[1:38:40] lived experience committee to
[1:38:43] advise the city on
[1:38:45] community-related efforts such as
[1:38:46] homelessness, substance use disorder,
[1:38:48] education, and quality of life.
[1:38:51] This committee is composed of
[1:38:53] full residents from certain
[1:38:55] districts, ensuring representation of
[1:38:59] the city.
[1:39:04] This, I'm going to say that
[1:39:07] public safety first, to
[1:39:09] complement if it's okay with the
[1:39:12] president and the committee, if not, it's going to be
[1:39:15] public safety because it's more about
[1:39:19] identifying, but first
[1:39:21] public safety.
[1:39:24] Okay. With a certain hammer, that would be fine
[1:39:28] . We don't do that for a minute
[1:39:31] , but yes. Let's do it.
[1:39:35] Okay. Envar public safety for everyone,
[1:39:37] please. Does
[1:39:39] anyone object?
[1:39:46] 52 is by Jenny Rivera orders that the
[1:39:48] Municipal Council of J authority
[1:39:50] approve a 6-month pilot program
[1:39:53] that allows the temporary use of two
[1:39:55] parking spaces on the
[1:39:57] public road in front of 267 as
[1:40:01] valet spaces for during business hours.
[1:40:04] It is further ordered that this
[1:40:06] pilot program aims to support the
[1:40:09] accessibility of a wellness center
[1:40:11] for older people that provides
[1:40:13] primary care services to
[1:40:15] people aged 55 and over. Uh,
[1:40:20] it is ordered that the operations of said
[1:40:22] spaces are subject to review and
[1:40:24] supervision and corresponding municipal departments
[1:40:26] including but not
[1:40:27] limited to the parking committee and
[1:40:30] that it complies with all
[1:40:31] traffic signage covered by
[1:40:34] permits or operations that the city
[1:40:36] considers necessary and it was ordered that the
[1:40:39] vehicles that use the price of be
[1:40:41] parked at the municipal hotel
[1:40:46] and that this order referred to the committee
[1:40:49] for reaction and commotion.
[1:40:53] Jarí will
[1:40:54] see that.
[1:40:59] Public safety.
[1:41:11] Yes, again before it takes a
[1:41:14] safe moment.
[1:41:18] I think it usually goes to the DGR.
[1:41:22] Thank you, Mr. President. Hey, Mr.
[1:41:24] Secretary, with a copy to the
[1:41:28] parking committee.
[1:41:31] The parking attendant, advice, I think another
[1:41:35] parking attendant.
[1:41:38] Send to TGR with a copy
[1:41:41] to the council committee. Ah, to the favor
[1:41:46] that opposes.
[1:41:48] 53 Councilor Jenny Rivera
[1:41:52] ordered that the council
[1:41:59] requested the Jolio Police Department
[1:42:02] share the
[1:42:03] relevant committee to explain the
[1:42:05] policies, procedures, and
[1:42:06] compliance practices related to fines
[1:42:09] against property owners who do not clear snow
[1:42:10] and ice from areas in accordance with
[1:42:12] municipal ordinances. It is
[1:42:13] further ordered that this matter be referred to the
[1:42:16] public safety committee for review and
[1:42:17] discussion, including how to handle
[1:42:19] repeated issues such as properties
[1:42:21] reported multiple times for non-
[1:42:23] compliance. The
[1:42:25] information is ordered to be provided to increase
[1:42:26] transparency, inform
[1:42:28] residents, and better prepare the city council for
[1:42:31] future events about which you want to send
[1:42:34] that public safety message. That's correct or
[1:42:35] right.
[1:42:37] Mr. President,
[1:42:42] I believe there is an ordinance
[1:42:46] that there is a charge of 50, a first,
[1:42:49] second confirmation,
[1:42:52] and I believe that is the order. Run me if you think
[1:42:55] , if I'm here it's actually to
[1:42:59] have a conversation about your
[1:43:00] ordinance
[1:43:02] and how you're forcing it. That's correct. Yes,
[1:43:05] that's correct.
[1:43:07] Thank you.
[1:43:11] Yes, we will certainly take that into account in terms of
[1:43:13] security for the judges
[1:43:17] in public. All in favor
[1:43:23] 54
[1:43:25] I invited to a forthcoming
[1:43:27] public safety committee meeting for a
[1:43:29] prominent discussion of the work they
[1:43:31] do in
[1:43:33] harm reduction. C send
[1:43:35] public safety.
[1:43:37] I vote in favor. Someone objects.
[1:43:41] So let's continue. 5. The council
[1:43:44] orders the charter and
[1:43:46] rules committee, the legal department, and the
[1:43:49] parks and recreation department to
[1:43:51] check if the language in the section
[1:43:53] corresponds
[1:43:57] to salary increases in
[1:44:00] municipal salvavis. Send and send the letter and
[1:44:03] rules with a copy.
[1:44:05] I see that the considered Viana is raised. I
[1:44:07] only have one question. I thought
[1:44:10] our ordinance was covered instead of
[1:44:13] our charter, but why did it stay here?
[1:44:18] It's in the letter that it considers, it may be that
[1:44:21] someone called me and they never had an
[1:44:24] increase,
[1:44:26] so I don't know where I should go, wherever I
[1:44:29] go, well, let me go.
[1:44:32] I think so, it's not in the cards.
[1:44:35] Sorry, I think
[1:44:37] the last thing that came came under
[1:44:41] ordinance, so I think we wanted to send
[1:44:43] the ordinance. Thank you. We only send
[1:44:46] ordinances that are
[1:44:49] all in favor. I, alien, become a
[1:44:53] 56-year-old counselor on the Divan.
[1:45:01] It is ordered that you have your hand raised
[1:45:04] for that reason or because of the issue we voted on. Alright
[1:45:07] .
[1:45:10] Sorry, I didn't see your hand raised.
[1:45:12] Okay, they
[1:45:14] already answered it. OK thanks.
[1:45:18] 56.
[1:45:20] Uh, it is ordered that municipal staff
[1:45:22] attending the Taylor Tech conference
[1:45:24] in April appear before the
[1:45:26] finance committee to report what they learned at
[1:45:29] said conference.
[1:45:33] Send where you want this or if you want it
[1:45:38] in finance. Yes, yes.
[1:45:43] Send all positive feedback to finance. Does
[1:45:45] anyone object?
[1:45:48] 57 Conservatives ordered that the
[1:45:52] retirement board conduct a feasibility study
[1:45:54] to fund Chapter
[1:45:57] 329
[1:45:59] C and D relating to half-salary payments
[1:46:01] for retirees, motion to send to the
[1:46:05] retirement board
[1:46:07] and obtain a response from them when they are
[1:46:09] able. Motion to send to the
[1:46:12] retirement board for a response.
[1:46:18] Hey, councilman,
[1:46:20] I only have one question, which is going to
[1:46:22] be a request,
[1:46:26] and we don't control
[1:46:29] the actions.
[1:46:30] Yes,
[1:46:32] just clarifying.
[1:46:37] I went to send it to the retirement board. And
[1:46:44] , sorry.
[1:46:47] Tell me, should we send the finances with
[1:46:50] the copy
[1:46:52] and if they want to discuss it with finance, they should
[1:46:54] probably be
[1:46:58] sent to finances.
[1:47:04] Everyone is doing a favor. Already.
[1:47:08] Okay.
[1:47:13] 58 is per councillor
[1:47:17] that city councillor accepts the
[1:47:18] profession of fiscal year 26 eh the
[1:47:22] recycling dividends for 7800 without
[1:47:27] counterpart.
[1:47:29] So,
[1:47:36] and we did, 61, so 62 by
[1:47:41] threat
[1:47:43] that session 54
[1:47:46] eh
[1:47:48] the removal
[1:47:52] that
[1:47:55] the business wheel lock have
[1:47:57] the responsibility
[1:47:58] to keep them in charge of their
[1:48:02] removal and which fulfilled some cart
[1:48:12] that 63 that the winter parking eh
[1:48:16] be reviewed as
[1:48:19] needed for the most
[1:48:20] functional clarity and flexibility based on the
[1:48:22] needs of DPW constituents.
[1:48:25] Everyone in favor.
[1:48:27] 64 is by myself. It is ordered that
[1:48:31] the St. Patrick's Day parade committee
[1:48:33] and the eh be invited to the
[1:48:37] meeting on March 17, 2026 to
[1:48:40] continue the annual translation, although I
[1:48:43] believe it has already been kicked around since January.
[1:48:46] And a list of winners to whom we will
[1:48:51] give schedules,
[1:48:53] so motion to receive and adapt.
[1:48:55] Second. I'm leaving the discussion open. Advice for the
[1:49:00] merely curious about who will be
[1:49:02] president.
[1:49:05] If
[1:49:07] I can, I like to speak in the third
[1:49:09] person.
[1:49:11] We can have another
[1:49:12] vice president. Thank you.
[1:49:16] Receive everything adapted in your favor. Someone
[1:49:19] puts
[1:49:21] 64 65 by
[1:49:26] ordering that session 38-73
[1:49:30] the ordinance code be in a pack
[1:49:34] to add the following. personnel
[1:49:36] allow or sound any signal
[1:49:39] coming from the Carrillos and
[1:49:41] Villa campaign or other similar device
[1:49:43] intended for participants for no more than 3
[1:49:45] minutes. Uh, any 7-day order
[1:49:49] will send orders, uh, all of them. When does it
[1:49:52] start? No. And then
[1:49:56] 66
[1:49:57] can put
[1:50:00] a subject
[1:50:02] of the cart Garcia naming the
[1:50:04] lady. a morg to serve on the
[1:50:08] local historic district commission.
[1:50:10] She will replace
[1:50:12] Mrs. David O and complete the remainder
[1:50:16] of her term, which expires on July 1,
[1:50:19] 2028. Under discussion, councilman.
[1:50:23] Mr. President,
[1:50:26] I've heard that Mr. Debón
[1:50:31] was never part of the team; he was
[1:50:36] appointed in December,
[1:50:43] so I
[1:50:45] want everyone to eat.
[1:50:53] Yes. Okay. You can send it to the committee or
[1:50:56] to public services. Someone puts
[1:51:03] one on, you get one,
[1:51:06] and that's it. So I'm going to entertain
[1:51:07] a motion to conclude.
[1:51:10] Everyone in favor. I. Anyone up for it?
[1:51:14] Thank you all.
[1:51:16] Well, good night. Thank you.