[0:06] there. My own
[0:06] >> I didn't mean mold me.
[0:09] Start for AUGUST. 28.
[0:10] >> For storm is is is minutes
[0:14] from last month. I make a
[0:18] motion that said last month, a
[0:20] second, moon second say Aye.
[0:24] Guess the ayes have it. We
[0:29] have one guest. She doing
[0:33] adoptions I'm to hear sons. Jo
[0:33] Conner, the county assessor,
[0:35] the non voting member.
[0:36] >> And the secretary of the
[0:39] board.
[0:40] >> You need to come our Office
[0:44] of Corporation counsel. Great
[0:46] right now, board member.
[0:48] >> Cathy Gould Board member.
[0:50] >> Steve has a PRESIDENT.
[0:56] Brian Barton board member.
[1:02] Sends an rn. Yes, okay. You're
[1:03] a stand-up. Raise your right
[1:08] house for u n. We sort of
[1:09] talked coach Wooden and but
[1:12] truth so help you GOD. So this
[1:15] is on Homestead.
[1:17] >> Yes, believe that's
[1:21] correct. Coming Yes, and give
[1:22] the parcel member and I can
[1:27] tell you what, Page. Is on the
[1:27] science sheet.
[1:29] >> It's one said, I'm sorry.
[1:41] Yes.
[1:42] >> Yes, 1, 0, 4, 8, 7, 9, 2,
[1:43] is on page one. 63 of your
[1:57] agenda.
[1:58] And this is the homes
[2:02] that Ascension. You want to
[2:04] state your name and
[2:10] >> so what's going on? Certain
[2:11] and I'm sure there's a
[2:11] microphone hanging right
[2:13] there. Want to stand. You
[2:21] know, my stand right there.
[2:22] And I reside at 909, South
[2:25] East Street.
[2:28] >> a reason for. My presence
[2:31] years. That's it. Reside at 9.
[2:35] So the street. The homestead
[2:36] exemption for the property
[2:39] was. Seemingly removed for the
[2:45] tax year. Table 2026. 2025.
[2:46] I'm here because I would like
[2:50] to appeal. Removal of the
[2:51] homestead exemption due to
[2:54] never say. And I can provide
[2:55] context now are you can ask
[2:58] questions. Not familiar with
[3:01] your process.
[3:10] >> Calling you want to?
[3:11] >> State your name colleague,
[3:13] County Auditor's Office. Mean,
[3:21] when from? Real tlc? To
[3:24] individual names 2024, that's
[3:25] one of the very specific
[3:28] situations for that. The Nbn
[3:32] Co says that you have reapply
[3:32] for Homestead deduction
[3:33] because those are separate
[3:38] legal entities completely. You
[3:39] know, that's not something
[3:43] that we actively all. That
[3:43] transfer as part of the
[3:44] assessment process. That
[3:49] production comes off. So
[3:52] statute regarding very clear
[3:53] and it's very cannot apply
[3:56] retroactively.
[4:02] >> argument is that? My
[4:03] research not been able to find
[4:04] specifically where Dundee in a
[4:08] covid that stated. And if you
[4:10] will, the miners initiate an
[4:14] appeal one 30? Provide
[4:18] everything in the reasoning. I
[4:20] had a preference.
[4:20] >> The resources of the
[4:25] sources. Specifically parts of
[4:26] the unit and Unicode and then
[4:33] also for the areas that uses
[4:36] so stay 0. 5, 4, 7, 3, At the
[4:42] time. From my review had
[4:45] admitted any relevant
[4:46] reference that changed
[4:46] entitled to the same honor.
[4:51] Disqualified eligibility. I
[4:53] was not able to find any
[4:54] memorialized evidence of that
[5:01] actually. Part of the Indiana
[5:06] code and the only thing that I
[5:10] found was a footnote. On the
[5:11] website which that form is
[5:14] located, which said The change
[5:14] in title to property MAY
[5:18] disqualify. It for Homestead
[5:19] deduction or require the
[5:22] deduction to be refiled. In my
[5:22] opinion, it reasonable
[5:29] guidance. In addition to that.
[5:29] You don't have a recollection
[5:38] of receiving formal Guess what
[5:40] I'm asking for is. Evidence
[5:46] that. There was written.
[5:52] Guidance Eligibility is remove
[5:53] there is administrative change
[5:58] title.
[5:59] >> I think part of it is a
[6:00] case of the same owner. But
[6:02] Pelosi and individual are very
[6:05] separate legal owners. In
[6:11] fact, the actual individuals.
[6:11] >> We say what I'm asking the
[6:14] county to consider that it was
[6:16] ministry to change. There was
[6:27] no sale. Remain. The again
[6:28] from the information that had
[6:31] been provided me. Was nowhere
[6:32] that I find it right. And
[6:35] that. Eligibility is
[6:36] disqualified for a change in
[6:44] title. Like
[6:45] >> But also I know we we spoke
[6:47] on the I provided you at home.
[6:48] When you first call, you
[6:52] reference.
[6:53] >> You reference that it was
[6:56] in the nba and you I wasn't
[6:56] able to find specifically
[7:01] where. Build the requirement.
[7:06] And what it. I guess,
[7:09] supporting evidence that. I
[7:13] must first.
[7:13] >> You didn't see on the Web
[7:15] site where it said it MAY
[7:17] qualified be done. Give us a
[7:19] cause. However, well, I did.
[7:23] That's why we spoke for Before
[7:26] did so you're acknowledging
[7:30] that.
[7:31] >> a statement that I put it
[7:35] on the heel. It is the only
[7:39] reading the information.
[7:39] Acknowledging that the only
[7:42] thing I could find. A
[7:47] footnote. Subsequently seeing
[7:47] weight and change right checks
[7:50] morning. But at the time 54
[7:57] 73. Any relative reference a
[7:57] change in title to the same
[7:58] honor, disqualified
[7:59] eligibility? After further
[8:05] research. That clause was
[8:07] shown in a footnote on the Web
[8:08] saver. That form is found.
[8:09] That said that the change in
[8:11] use, we're told to a property
[8:13] MAY underline disqualify it
[8:16] may is not a certainty. And so
[8:19] that in I interpret that to
[8:22] mean that. It is up to the
[8:24] discretion of the county. I'm
[8:29] asking for question. Because I
[8:31] have resided at the home.
[8:33] Nothing has changed outside of
[8:40] estate planning. What to a
[8:40] change in title from
[8:46] administrative perspective.
[8:50] Taxpayer. You know that it's
[8:52] justified that. You all
[8:56] consider. Allowing me to
[8:57] reapply the Homestead
[8:59] deduction, too. The 2025 tax
[9:01] year. Based on information
[9:04] that. Was available to me the
[9:13] time.
[9:14] >> You know, from our
[9:20] standpoint, Eg realty transfer
[9:21] individual. There's no way we
[9:23] know. And these are the see
[9:26] people.
[9:27] >> They're the auditor's
[9:27] office. One is not where
[9:32] transfers. And don't get a
[9:32] notification from someone
[9:36] files and the only way that
[9:36] really aware that somehow home
[9:40] said. And be applied they come
[9:47] for office Cala speechless.
[9:47] Yes, after a lot of things
[9:48] send them over and might want
[9:49] check with the auditor of
[9:52] filing sort of deductions. In
[9:53] general. I don't have any idea
[9:54] what operations for on a daily
[9:58] basis. So my office to know
[9:59] this is the same person that
[10:04] was part of l c these are the
[10:06] specific carve-out, Indiana Co
[10:08] it's safe. The owner has 3 a I
[10:09] there's only a one-year carry
[10:13] over. We four-year state on 25
[10:17] that come fall. So did not
[10:24] Asian. Think we said this. Can
[10:24] be active. So 3 there, I think
[10:27] these people are not, but
[10:28] they're playing at that
[10:35] option.
[10:35] >> MR. Could maybe provide
[10:41] some context. Is. What was the
[10:43] deeds purpose? Was it? You
[10:43] mentioned estate planning. So
[10:47] you've always lived in Are you
[10:50] want hot new on title? And
[10:50] title.
[10:52] >> I was a member of the
[10:52] entity that previously had
[10:55] title to that to the And the
[10:57] reason for the change is that.
[10:59] My parents. Head on other
[11:03] assets. That interview was
[11:07] affiliated with those assets
[11:07] it was under the guidance of
[11:09] my attorney that I MAY. Want
[11:17] to. Ugg Realty had on other
[11:22] assets of which. Other family
[11:23] members of mine were going to
[11:28] be living in and they. We're
[11:30] considering recording those as
[11:31] their primary residences and
[11:32] considering applying for the
[11:33] homestead exemption as well.
[11:37] And we wanted to Queen. So
[11:39] that we would be in
[11:40] qualification that in
[11:41] compliance with any homestead
[11:44] tax exemption. Guidelines and
[11:45] it was under the guidance of
[11:49] our attorney that we we as the
[11:51] children of my parents who
[11:52] were the main shareholders of
[11:55] the original entity title 2,
[11:57] 909. So the street. And other
[12:01] assets that other. So once
[12:01] vine led the now currently
[12:05] live in. We separate them.
[12:11] More. I guess.
[12:12] >> So, know, it was a
[12:14] Homestead application in
[12:14] you're.
[12:15] >> Its name or if it was in my
[12:16] name and I was approved in
[12:18] 2022.
[12:20] >> And my my argument is that
[12:22] I remain in compliance. With
[12:27] ability requirements. I didn't
[12:28] have guidance from my attorney
[12:28] to reapply. Otherwise I would
[12:32] have.
[12:34] >> Engine real tv is an oc,
[12:37] but the nc the title was
[12:38] transferred to what was once
[12:39] an oc. It's just. 3
[12:45] individuals which I'm one of.
[12:46] >> Right now, it's just
[12:49] they've gotten. And for it
[12:50] coming up.
[12:51] >> you need to click on
[12:52] because it's abbreviated
[12:53] version of the actual title on
[12:56] Monday. The Deegan from me.
[12:57] >> That's what I'm just asking
[12:58] them to double check. Because
[13:00] right now have. Yeah, that
[13:02] right now for owners, that's
[13:03] all we've got, which looked
[13:04] into double checks because
[13:08] your system abbreviate, not
[13:08] welcome. Morning. Now I
[13:09] understand I'm not saying not
[13:10] I'm just asking them to double
[13:11] check their system to make
[13:11] sure it's correct on their
[13:15] side. Got Okay.
[13:16] >> So I think that has the
[13:19] perfect reason is again, one
[13:20] is e what's the story for
[13:24] reference. But 2, just what he
[13:25] was talking about, the Elysee
[13:28] having multiple members.
[13:30] Multiple members might be
[13:31] playing home, said on
[13:32] different properties, which is
[13:32] why Elsa's are so hard for us
[13:36] to. Because there could be 8
[13:37] members of the Al see, I don't
[13:40] know who's living Which is,
[13:41] again, a reason that the state
[13:46] is so strict on. We don't have
[13:50] any idea. You 6 properties and
[13:50] their 6 family members never
[13:54] be Sat on front lines. We
[13:55] react patients and they're
[13:56] starting come out about people
[13:59] in tracks. Because we would be
[14:00] would have any idea is a
[14:03] member if have always had
[14:05] access to So that additional
[14:07] information we have that
[14:07] coming
[14:10] >> So elsie's can fall from
[14:11] spent.
[14:12] >> They be approved. A
[14:14] individuals, 9.
[14:17] >> Applications self has being
[14:17] individuals. And if change
[14:20] whenever something strange,
[14:21] absolutely no way for us to
[14:23] correct Tonioli track. That's
[14:24] not information that we
[14:27] district here at the county. A
[14:30] question. Abort. MR. CHAIRMAN.
[14:34] Yes.
[14:35] >> want words your mouth, but
[14:36] you used the word. MAY tell me
[14:38] that again about that. You
[14:43] said MAY do what?
[14:44] >> If look for your dressing
[14:50] me or hurt. Believe, but want
[14:51] cancer.
[14:52] >> Yeah. So he he record.
[14:53] Seemed like our Web site where
[14:54] we've got a little note on
[14:58] their right now. You have
[15:04] >> Now I do. But I know it.
[15:06] The Web site and actually for
[15:07] the Homestead Act, publication
[15:09] has changed since I made this
[15:14] appeal and we spoke. Outside
[15:14] of just I don't know how to
[15:17] reference historical suit.
[15:19] >> I think my question is
[15:20] where you're referencing yet.
[15:23] You MAY remove it. No
[15:27] >> so we we don't even. Think
[15:29] we moved that actually handle
[15:30] by the assessor's office when
[15:34] transfers. Well, we have what
[15:35] we have on the website was
[15:36] that if you're making a change
[15:40] in how it all? It MAY that
[15:40] your deductions you need to
[15:42] reach out to us to find out
[15:44] because there are certain
[15:47] situations. Let's say we have
[15:48] a to you know, a husband and
[15:51] wife. Why passes away? In that
[15:52] situation? That's not
[15:54] situation.
[15:57] >> My comment is that if we're
[16:02] being reasonable. I wouldn't
[16:02] be on that page on our
[16:03] website. My side otherwise
[16:04] would have known to look
[16:08] there. That I didn't know why.
[16:10] That was PRESIDENT. To
[16:15] reapply. Windy on the state
[16:16] website looking at forms for
[16:17] homes, application unless
[16:20] otherwise was prompted to.
[16:21] >> So it should be noted the
[16:22] Indiana law states.
[16:27] >> That's
[16:29] >> there is a change in
[16:32] eligibility. The Homestead
[16:33] must be reapplied interchange,
[16:36] an owner and the ownership is
[16:38] specifically change.
[16:39] >> That requires a reply of
[16:39] the home said issue. That's
[16:42] straight from the Indiana Co
[16:43] Seductions.
[16:47] >> Can can you tell me what?
[16:48] >> and not 6, that it's any
[16:51] had 6 dash. 1.1, that's 12
[16:56] dash. 37. So.
[16:57] >> And MISS And MISS You at
[16:57] night. Don't MISS A disagree
[17:01] with that. I just think. There
[17:02] was an llc which she's a
[17:04] member of was in his name. And
[17:07] it's really close.
[17:07] >> But that also you let's
[17:10] remember, bells not in his
[17:11] name.
[17:12] >> So no evidence. It said me
[17:13] the corporations personally
[17:15] get it. But but he's a part of
[17:19] that corporation. It's just
[17:22] and how much money are Looking
[17:24] at here? On the last of
[17:27] action.
[17:34] >> Well, this
[17:36] >> 2024 his taxes were 9,000
[17:38] for the year with the homes
[17:45] deduction. That was yeah. That
[17:48] was with the homes that.
[17:50] Without the Homestead. They
[17:56] double.
[17:59] >> Can can you please state
[17:59] figure?
[18:03] >> It is for the year 19,000
[18:04] 8.56 And that includes storm
[18:05] solid waste fees as did the
[18:08] 9,000 from the previous year.
[18:09] >> And I'd also like to say
[18:11] that the state is very clear
[18:13] that the burden that following
[18:13] the homeowner, if you are
[18:14] making changes as a homeowner,
[18:15] you're supposed to be aware of
[18:18] what you do and we try to past
[18:20] obviously in the U.S. But now
[18:21] that we're down to the
[18:21] assessor, I know their staff
[18:24] is a really great about say,
[18:24] hey, go beyond office right
[18:27] now, they're making a change.
[18:28] So you can check on the
[18:29] deductions. I don't know how
[18:29] do this out of this hot,
[18:31] in-person or by mail you know,
[18:35] for him. I feel pain. The
[18:37] tourney for legal advice.
[18:44] Might be. To double check What
[18:47] are passionate home. Do a
[18:51] professional service. But had
[19:01] no idea to notify 3 of 5.
[19:02] >> I will state because I know
[19:03] it was stated that he didn't
[19:05] receive a form. 11 former 11
[19:07] would not tell him if he had a
[19:07] homestead deduction on his
[19:09] property or not just to the
[19:12] board is aware that formal
[19:13] evidence, just a notice of
[19:14] assessment does not talk about
[19:16] deductions or anything else,
[19:19] but so that when not of
[19:19] >> and what showed me that my
[19:20] taxes to fund the.
[19:25] >> It's a it just shows are
[19:26] assessed value. So it tell you
[19:27] anything about if you had a
[19:28] homestead deduction or not.
[19:30] And unfortunately, that's not
[19:36] it required on the form 11.
[19:39] >> So and is it is not easy.
[19:44] In ordinary person. 2. When
[19:45] something like this would be
[19:46] triggered unless you're
[19:49] looking for. Which I did and I
[19:49] couldn't find reasonable
[19:52] evidence that. There was
[19:54] military requirement. To
[20:00] refile.
[20:01] >> Did did you for me and I
[20:01] guess didn't look for him
[20:03] because I would not have known
[20:04] otherwise. This what I'm
[20:07] trying to articulate, I think
[20:07] >> they are ready for motions.
[20:10] Almost like a motion.
[20:11] >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I make a
[20:14] motion that we accept as I
[20:18] just can't imagine. I
[20:19] understand all the arguments
[20:20] but to double its taxes. That
[20:22] just does not seem. For this
[20:29] board member. Second. Been
[20:29] moved second and first
[20:33] session. Seeing none all in
[20:41] favor say Aye. Aye against. I
[20:44] So 2 to tie foe. Was your next
[20:53] month. 23 1 It will not be
[20:55] there next month. Just so the
[20:58] board where probably still for
[20:59] people. Yeah, we'll still have
[21:04] for that. Want too much you
[21:11] want 5 members.
[21:15] >> that's why I'm bringing in
[21:21] now
[21:22] >> And
[21:23] >> how Just saying that next
[21:23] month they're still going in
[21:28] before board members here. So
[21:31] it would But have come back
[21:32] again. So would you be willing
[21:33] we pushed back 2 months to
[21:34] make sure that we have 5
[21:40] members? Are just want go? And
[21:40] we just I mean, it's your time
[21:42] sided with wasted if we don't.
[21:47] You know over, but still a
[21:48] month before the taxable
[21:49] sales. Let's hopefully of
[21:52] time. Think we can get for
[21:55] SEPTEMBER.
[21:56] >> I'm happy to come and
[21:59] provide my return asked again
[22:03] for consideration.
[22:04] >> As well, think that will
[22:05] limit just have most
[22:09] competent. For now. That set
[22:13] up a the next month.
[22:16] >> We need again the next
[22:16] meeting with the SEPTEMBER
[22:25] 25th. That works for you.
[22:26] >> Only it were part what the
[22:28] one thing I would like to walk
[22:30] away with here is the you
[22:31] brought a specific provision
[22:35] and Indiana code. Can you
[22:36] provide me a resource to
[22:36] actually access that? In
[22:41] addition. You got on and when
[22:43] I can see it if and when the
[22:46] code was amended so I can
[22:47] reference the application.
[22:52] We're Hill. So they can see if
[22:53] it was amended from then to
[23:01] now. What was amended.
[23:01] >> Colleen so. And I tell you
[23:05] a But I just.
[23:06] >> I want to go on record that
[23:09] I ask you for that months ago.
[23:13] And you just directed me to.
[23:13] >> Well, but I actually gave
[23:18] you the co. The covid guidance
[23:20] on where to find that. And
[23:20] then subsequently I research
[23:25] and I provided. My findings in
[23:29] the appeal which every state I
[23:30] I want to go on record that
[23:34] the website has been updated.
[23:34] And form 5, 4, 7, 3, also been
[23:37] updated to include specific.
[23:42] Commentary. Relative to my
[23:43] case, specifically that if
[23:45] there is a change title. But
[23:54] it's no showing that. 54 73.
[24:00] For some That's also pill
[24:06] form. Yes, there's not there's
[24:08] no need to to that form that
[24:12] discloses ineligibility.
[24:12] Reference for change the
[24:15] title. So what I'm looking for
[24:16] is reference on where can find
[24:17] when if there is such when
[24:21] that was changed. Because I
[24:22] think that that would be in
[24:24] for a reference next time.
[24:26] >> I think that's something he
[24:28] would have talked to the state
[24:30] of Indiana. Good luck with And
[24:30] finance is a does those forms
[24:34] for us? Their website has
[24:38] control money of information
[24:39] there. That's also weakened on
[24:40] the state's website. Access in
[24:42] code and everything else.
[24:49] >> And as
[24:50] >> Okay. Here we go Thank you.
[24:59] Thank you, When are general
[25:06] come in AUGUST United? For
[25:07] >> the workers, I guess just
[25:11] go on until what You start and
[25:15] all check with her.
[25:30] >> one through 20.
[25:35] One parcel
[25:45] 1, 0, 6, 7, 2, 8, 1, only ones
[25:51] with joy harvest.
[25:56] >> Yes.
[25:57] >> And we were moved their air
[25:59] conditioning on that as well.
[26:10] >> Then you sign in.
[26:13] >> sign is that you know,
[26:13] table, you remember the time
[26:23] help them out. With that.
[26:25] Apart from the virus, we'll
[26:35] see. It's is it one listened.
[26:37] Okay. So then. What's a
[26:44] personal friend? Or 2? Well,
[27:10] 90. I was there to 12, 90.
[27:11] There's not open appeal on
[27:21] file on this. There's a 2024,
[27:29] but it was final. JULY 24th of
[27:37] 2026 and went to the people.
[27:38] So he's got notes here that he
[27:39] was. So I'm here today to ask
[27:45] for.
[27:54] >> Because language barrier.
[27:54] >> He is one that called he
[27:55] said that he would need a
[27:57] translator. I told him to
[27:59] check that. You see.
[28:01] >> That's the one we said. We
[28:01] didn't know the translate.
[28:05] What? Translator we would
[28:07] need. So.
[28:08] >> Okay. Language need it?
[28:10] Yes.
[28:13] >> So that's for peace.
[28:14] Burmese. Okay. So we can get
[28:15] one for next month's.
[28:18] >> Well, it will or
[28:18] >> first, I guess they have to
[28:23] reopen right? Well, but it's
[28:25] it's closing. Still have open
[28:26] that back up for them, too, to
[28:39] do that. That's why I'm
[28:41] bringing so that it can then
[28:46] she can work with
[28:47] >> But isn't on the agenda.
[28:47] It's not on the agenda. So
[28:52] those are on Well, we That's
[28:56] right. You know. Even though
[28:57] it's not listed as other
[28:59] business, we could still. It's
[29:02] being brought other business.
[29:05] Now. That's not how it All
[29:14] right. Put on next month Rio
[29:19] to reopen difference to work
[29:29] do they understand that? If
[29:33] you We'll just put it on for
[29:48] next.
[29:51] Back to Page Did I
[29:55] answer that? When MR. On your
[30:01] bill. Tomorrow. Far just
[30:05] better Joyce. Look at the
[30:08] photos because it could be
[30:08] that. So a lot of apartment
[30:19] complexes. First floor can be.
[30:35] Person again. 6, 7, 2, 8, 1,
[30:41] We changed all the way, So the
[30:47] photos. So that is what choice
[30:51] on that second building. Bill.
[30:51] So, yes, it was entered
[30:58] correctly. And then we are
[31:03] going out. Applying this is
[31:08] from 2017. This is why. We
[31:09] like so this is the buildings
[31:10] are going up. So if someone
[31:13] does come back saying where
[31:13] also fact 2017, Isabella,
[31:21] 2017, and they just aren't.
[31:22] And then we determined double
[31:36] a c.
[31:46] led on one, Want it went.
[31:46] We'll make a motion pay one
[31:51] through 27.
[31:52] >> Spend second for
[31:56] discussion. Seeing none offers
[31:57] say I I I guess you guys have
[31:59] it.
[32:19] 28 one. 62.
[32:30] One 43. Arson 104,
[32:40] 9, 1, 7, 3, assessment 0.
[32:46] >> This is a residential so
[32:47] Nats Park in cannot be
[32:51] improved. 1, 0, 4, 9, 9, 1, 7,
[32:55] 3,
[32:56] >> When a shift to be
[32:59] assessment center.
[33:01] >> I mean, it's not a city
[33:02] Parker, right?
[33:07] >> Went online and vigil. 1000
[33:12] are 14.0 43.
[33:12] >> that neighborhood park for
[33:26] kids play?
[33:27] >> I'll have to get with them
[33:28] and to find out what happened
[33:31] there. Table.
[33:38] >> consider
[33:43] >> It is not in a floodplain.
[33:44] Well close, but it's not
[33:45] properties on pk. One is on
[33:46] the belt, but
[33:48] >> assessment, honor. I It's
[33:51] not only the city.
[34:05] >> filings tending to donate.
[34:06] >> I mean, technically, yes,
[34:09] it is the way that the zoning
[34:09] line goes.
[34:11] >> d 8 stops here and that's
[34:18] he came on over there.
[34:19] >> Once online different
[34:20] things, right. But the issue
[34:22] police tax honor. So go ahead
[34:37] again.
[35:10] Ac sharing. Talk to
[35:14] >> One 13. Parcel 1, 1, 1, 6,
[35:22] 4, 7, There's no real reason
[35:27] why change or from. About
[35:33] 700,000. And 21 or
[35:36] Pennsylvania.
[35:41] >> Gabriel. We're getting off
[35:51] because a vacancy.
[35:53] >> Apartment building. It's
[36:03] not an apartment building.
[36:09] Still up. That doesn't bacon.
[36:11] Am I putting in the right
[36:13] personal 1, 1, 1, 6, 4, 7,
[36:17] This doesn't look vacant. As
[36:19] of 3. 24 26. Now this is a 24
[36:24] appeal. You know, 25 I mean,
[36:28] their cars there.
[36:28] >> Let's let's table one,
[36:29] please. And we'll get more
[36:44] information.
[37:00] >> 16. Parcel one of 3, 8, 9,
[37:10] 9, 2, The hotel. Mary, out
[37:14] there on Morrison Street, yes.
[37:20] Says based on or sales.
[37:21] Assessed based on sales and
[37:21] come on.
[37:23] >> Hotels?
[37:25] >> We can ease.
[37:28] >> One the 3 approaches to it.
[37:31] >> ones.
[37:32] >> This was one that we came
[37:32] to an agreement gave. If you
[37:42] remember. One where we it was.
[37:46] Sales that did the income. Got
[37:47] agreement that we thought was
[37:50] reasonable with the taxpayer.
[37:56] >> That's the 2020? The 24 if
[37:58] I went with 67 million rate.
[38:02] >> We got them to a draw 20
[38:03] 3.24 And we agreed to every
[38:06] direction for 20. 25 26.
[38:15] >> And 26 for 60 Million. So
[38:16] one down it was 76 Million.
[38:17] And we dropped it to 67 for
[38:32] 26.
[39:06] Page. 1.2 7, 2, 1, 4, 5,
[39:07] at a questions for dated
[39:13] building design.
[39:21] >> That's a new one for too.
[39:22] What's the at the Dayton
[39:28] building? Design. Why are we
[39:32] caring something or?
[39:35] >> it
[39:37] >> Table that want to please.
[39:40] I don't like reasoning. Need
[39:46] to see why.
[39:52] >> before. There was.
[39:55] >> In 2017, we did a chain
[39:59] know he withdrew 2017, this is
[40:00] not grand jurors decision
[40:03] because they never is was
[40:05] withdrawn and less gave some
[40:06] obsolescence or something some
[40:10] point. I don't know that take
[40:16] a look Yeah.
[40:17] >> So question I don't know
[40:17] Make a motion page. 28 for
[40:26] one. 62. Second or first
[40:26] question seeing none all in
[40:31] favor. My most was the one. To
[40:34] prove all ones we table,
[40:35] correct. So all in favor say
[40:45] Aye. Aye.
[40:46] >> Appeals from the air and
[40:50] off one. 63 201. The cna on
[41:01] you know. Seemed to be a lot
[41:06] of No assessment system. Yeah,
[41:07] a lot of them the failure to
[41:13] appear. Campaign one. 33 with
[41:13] table 2 next month We just
[41:22] moved in they want. Sent 1, 1,
[41:24] of emotions as one 2 for 2.
[41:31] 201. It's been moved to second
[41:33] and first question seeing none
[41:35] all in favor say Aye. Aye
[41:39] against the ayes. Have it.
[41:54] Withdraws pages to prove 2.43
[41:55] I make a motion that separates
[41:58] 2, 2, through 2.43 So at that
[41:59] spending in second, any
[42:03] further discussion. Seeing
[42:04] none offers say Aye. Aye. The
[42:07] ayes have As page to 44
[42:13] through 2.79 And actually got
[42:13] a couple.
[42:16] >> yes, so the first one is on
[42:18] to page 2, 7, 2, parcels, 704,
[42:21] 3, 9, 2, 7, For Goodwill Lady
[42:23] Seager.
[42:27] >> They submitted the
[42:28] >> to be transferred on
[42:29] DECEMBER 31st, which our
[42:33] office is closed. So their
[42:34] transfer date on their Di was
[42:39] marked for 2026. The deed
[42:39] itself was signed DECEMBER
[42:42] saying 2025, but their
[42:43] official transfer date was as
[42:47] of 2026. So they're requesting
[42:49] that exemption be approved
[42:49] even though it has a transfer
[42:53] in 2026. It was a 1, 9, 3, 2,
[42:57] 5,
[43:01] >> Parcel, 819-704-3927. So
[43:02] the execution date was in
[43:08] 2025. Transferred until 2020
[43:13] >> So of your fsa. Okay. And
[43:18] that's a recognition award.
[43:19] And has different I just
[43:22] reckon you guys to make that
[43:29] this ok.
[43:31] >> It's not going to be on the
[43:32] agenda, because I table it for
[43:34] this month that they need more
[43:37] time. It was 703-5792.
[43:40] >> Minutes and on this and up,
[43:45] no, that time.
[43:46] >> It's a part of good will
[44:01] different. It time next. A
[44:12] question.
[44:17] >> Page 2.45? Partial, 1, 0,
[44:24] 0, 2, 5, 7, 7, says Political
[44:25] subdivision is that the
[44:34] Supreme Court.
[44:37] >> 88
[44:39] >> As a couple on here,
[44:43] different values. And I was
[44:55] about 12.2 2.54 Parcel 1, 0,
[44:58] 4, 7, 4, 1, has 2.1 least
[45:03] Supreme Court.
[45:08] >> I on the building.
[45:09] >> And that's why parents here
[45:11] answer that question.
[45:12] >> Well, I think I'm that I
[45:16] they were all. Can students to
[45:17] tournament parcels, correct?
[45:22] Bill does 2 parcels.
[45:30] >> the a
[45:40] >> Wallace 21% 23.1% And I'm
[45:46] sorry, page. To 61. For for 1,
[45:57] 1, 0, 0, 8, 7, 9, It's not a
[46:00] new hotel. Isn't.
[46:01] >> sit us and believe it is
[46:04] the double checked.
[46:05] >> 1, 1, while you're there
[46:10] are 8, 7, 9,
[46:13] >> I don't like is the this
[46:15] That's the office tower that
[46:15] was bought. What's the
[46:19] reasoning on that one?
[46:20] >> Well, tensions 49% owned by
[46:24] Capital Improvement Board.
[46:25] >> think just because they own
[46:29] we should be.
[46:32] >> I don't know how evening
[46:33] Capital Improvement Board owns
[46:36] 29 per cent of that off
[46:38] >> and the Army Building
[46:44] Facilities Corporation get It
[46:45] says most there this the
[46:49] building. Yet. See it owns it.
[46:56] Yes. But don't apply for a 9%.
[46:57] So been the support I would
[47:00] you in hands 49%. I'm not even
[47:01] sure they are required to
[47:02] apply for an exemption. I
[47:05] think there's a state statute.
[47:08] So if you exempt, I believe
[47:10] so. I mean, I think need. Look
[47:17] at And again. 2012, there's
[47:18] new statute that kind of
[47:22] blanket. Exempted. Don't
[47:33] remember you know. Council
[47:35] look into case. You that's a
[47:52] or whatever. That's I To see.
[47:56] I want to one's
[47:56] >> Supreme Court from kind of
[47:59] care. A court injunction. On
[48:01] that do.
[48:06] >> The union unions. We're
[48:07] doing. But his last month in
[48:10] week. Nothing updated. Okay.
[48:16] We're just and give. Thing
[48:25] new.
[48:27] >> I make a motion page 2.44
[48:28] Through 2, 7, a lot to 79 with
[48:28] them on the site of one of the
[48:35] table. Second for discussion.
[48:36] Seeing none all in favor say
[48:39] Aye. Aye. The ayes have it.
[48:45] >> We MR. Johnson on here.
[48:46] >> MR. Johnson was that we
[48:47] didn't know he was going to
[48:50] invite. He said he was going
[48:52] to come. So basically what
[48:55] happened was he was sent one
[48:56] for teens and one fifteens to
[49:00] the address in pd.
[49:00] >> That he hadn't updated. And
[49:01] so he actually never received
[49:06] the form 4 this hearing. So he
[49:08] was asking the the be re.
[49:09] Those appeals be reopened
[49:10] since he never actually
[49:14] received the form. But yes, it
[49:20] not arsenal. If there's 2 its
[49:28] 701, 6 to 0, 9, and 700-2482.
[49:29] >> Do do know is the kernel
[49:32] address the correct address?
[49:33] >> Thank you. Said that was
[49:34] his old address.
[49:37] >> So still hasn't updated it
[49:38] as far as I'm aware because I
[49:40] to show him where to get the
[49:42] change of address form. But
[49:43] then how did he know he missed
[49:47] it?
[49:47] >> Because he called because
[49:54] he. He finally got sent the
[49:55] form one 15. And so then he
[49:57] called asking what that was
[49:58] about.
[49:59] >> And then I explain it to
[50:00] him and he said he never got
[50:02] the win for teens. I asked
[50:03] that address was correct in
[50:06] That's as old one. And he has
[50:10] like 3 different.
[50:11] >> Parcells. But these 2 women
[50:13] believed to JULY. The JULY
[50:17] peta, yes, they were just last
[50:22] month.
[50:22] >> He was told that here and
[50:26] right.
[50:27] >> Yes, I told him that was
[50:28] today what floor? And he said
[50:32] he was coming. So I guess it's
[50:35] up to you. If you want to.
[50:40] >> Open it or
[50:43] >> so did get the one 15
[50:44] enough to win 14? He said the
[50:47] one 15 was finally forwarded
[50:48] to him, but he didn't get the
[50:49] one for teens for either
[50:52] parcel. And he did it on the
[50:54] 3rd one either. But that was
[50:57] one that hadn't gone to
[50:58] hearing it. So it is able to
[51:00] change it to a day when he
[51:03] could come. That?
[51:04] >> That's what that's where
[51:08] she is it's still an incorrect
[51:10] >> show them where to get the
[51:11] form. And he said he was going
[51:19] to.
[51:19] >> So we need a motion reopen
[51:23] under.
[51:25] >> Record if you there's
[51:27] nothing to it. Yeah, there's
[51:30] nothing on agenda. It's under
[51:33] his other business that I
[51:33] don't.
[51:37] >> need to do. They have to
[51:37] their There's not open This
[51:38] was just from the taxpayer to
[51:42] come back and ask to open So.
[51:43] >> Since the taxpayers not
[51:43] here, is really anything for
[51:45] them to act So you don't have
[51:48] to do anything.
[51:53] >> Acting on right? We do need
[51:59] to act on And I want anything
[52:04] else come forward. We're