1 00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:20,380 We are open to the public. Thank you. Let's ensure that Micah's gone lives, standby. 2 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:26,540 Okay, we're like. 3 00:03:27,260 --> 00:03:28,460 Thank you. 4 00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:36,340 A couple of order, the city council meeting of August 5th, 2026, as you can see tonight's council meeting is being held virtually. 5 00:03:37,020 --> 00:03:46,960 Due to critical maintenance and upgrades underway in council chambers. During the meeting, we may take brief breaks as needed to address any technical issues 6 00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:50,280 and help ensure the meeting proceeds as smoothly as possible. 7 00:03:51,100 --> 00:03:53,260 And Council, thank you so much. 8 00:03:53,580 --> 00:03:56,020 Please give me a little grace as we start out. 9 00:03:56,140 --> 00:03:58,480 As I get the lay of the landscape here, 10 00:03:58,740 --> 00:04:01,420 I'm very appreciative to former Mayor Sweet 11 00:04:01,420 --> 00:04:03,500 having done this for quite a long time, 12 00:04:03,580 --> 00:04:04,800 but we'll get through it. 13 00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:07,540 So, City Clerk, will you please call the roll? 14 00:04:08,380 --> 00:04:09,380 Council member Tim Chison. 15 00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:11,700 Council member Arnold. 16 00:04:13,100 --> 00:04:14,080 Council member Prim. 17 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:15,120 Here. 18 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:19,820 Councilmember Felcon here. Councilmember Paskell. 19 00:04:20,460 --> 00:04:22,480 Yeah. Deputy Mayor Black. 20 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,500 Here. Mayor Curtis. Here. 21 00:04:26,500 --> 00:04:31,330 All right. Our study session tonight is on two items. First, we'll have an update on the 22 00:04:39,930 --> 00:04:45,910 We expect to reconvene our regular meeting at 730 City Manager. 23 00:04:46,870 --> 00:04:47,890 Okay, thank you, Madam Mayor. 24 00:04:48,230 --> 00:04:52,290 So we have the whole 90 minutes of the study session set out for these two topics. 25 00:04:52,530 --> 00:04:53,410 It's related topics. 26 00:04:54,450 --> 00:04:57,290 I've asked everyone to keep their cameras off and us they're speaking. 27 00:04:57,690 --> 00:04:59,970 I want to give a huge thanks to folks of top of work. 28 00:05:00,050 --> 00:05:08,070 And finance to put together a lot of really complicated information. And also our consultant team, we're going to hear from who that's on a fabulous job. 29 00:05:08,530 --> 00:05:17,270 But it's all going to be led by Jenna Gowlster, a surface painter strategic advisor. And she has lots of help, who people will check in when needed and Tracy don't laugh. 30 00:05:17,510 --> 00:05:23,570 It's also here in deputy city manager to chime in as needed, where she is in the tricities. So with that help, we're over to Jenny. 31 00:05:25,390 --> 00:05:26,670 Thank you very much. 32 00:05:27,090 --> 00:05:29,750 Good evening, Madam Mayor and members of the council. 33 00:05:30,630 --> 00:05:33,010 Again, I'm Jenny Gals, surface water strategic advisor. 34 00:05:33,370 --> 00:05:37,870 And I'm managing the utility rate process for 2027, 2028. 35 00:05:38,310 --> 00:05:41,290 And Brooke is kindly running the slides for me right now. 36 00:05:41,990 --> 00:05:43,070 Next slide. 37 00:05:46,410 --> 00:05:48,410 We have a very knowledgeable group of people. 38 00:05:48,670 --> 00:05:53,450 All of whom have helped to develop the budget assumptions and the models that are going to 39 00:05:53,450 --> 00:05:59,590 to update curriculums utility rates. The FCS team and myself will be the main presenters, but we 40 00:05:59,590 --> 00:06:08,170 do have many other folks standing by as questions arise. Next slide. And before we launch into sort 41 00:06:08,170 --> 00:06:12,470 of the mute of the presentation, wanted to just highlight some of the process improvements that have 42 00:06:12,470 --> 00:06:19,490 happened since the last great sitting process. We're doing more forecasting of revenues, staff 43 00:06:19,490 --> 00:06:24,390 is reviewing and reporting on revenue trends each month so that we have the most up-to-date information. 44 00:06:25,430 --> 00:06:30,770 Water and sewer utilities have been split apart so that we could better see how each is 45 00:06:30,770 --> 00:06:40,650 fairing financially. The utility policy supervisor is now allocated to water sewer and solid waste. 46 00:06:41,590 --> 00:06:47,210 And then we are really working on prioritizing water and sewer engineering and planning. And so 47 00:06:47,210 --> 00:06:51,870 those things are really going to help with the transparency and accountability in the process. 48 00:06:52,590 --> 00:07:00,310 Next slide. And so tonight is the first three meetings where we're going to discuss utility rates 49 00:07:00,310 --> 00:07:06,810 updates. We'll be returning on September 15th with our proposed rates and again on October 20th 50 00:07:06,810 --> 00:07:13,110 with our final rates. Tonight we have our consultant team here to provide background on the rate models 51 00:07:13,110 --> 00:07:20,330 And to present the preliminary rates, these are rates that we are current fiscal policies. 52 00:07:21,130 --> 00:07:25,250 We're also going to be discussing potential ways to moderate these rate increases. 53 00:07:26,230 --> 00:07:28,790 And we'll see council guidance on the preferred rates scenario. 54 00:07:29,590 --> 00:07:31,830 Note that I have some slides available. 55 00:07:32,770 --> 00:07:38,990 After books presentation, if there are questions, I have a set of slides that is available for us to use. 56 00:07:38,990 --> 00:07:42,870 Now, I'll introduce FCS's team. 57 00:07:44,030 --> 00:07:47,730 Burtisha is a project manager with SES, a Bowman Company. 58 00:07:48,410 --> 00:07:53,450 She's been with FCS for over 10 years, and has performed similar rates studies for many 59 00:07:53,450 --> 00:07:57,950 cities in the Pacific Northwest, and we're very pleased to have her managing the rate modeling 60 00:07:57,950 --> 00:07:59,070 efforts for Kirkland. 61 00:08:00,050 --> 00:08:04,650 With her tonight is Amanda Levine, who's managing the solid waste elements of the process. 62 00:08:04,650 --> 00:08:15,610 And likewise, it has performed many utility rates studies and engagements over her eight years with FCS, together that walk us through the preliminary rate study results. 63 00:08:16,610 --> 00:08:17,270 So, take it away, Brooke. 64 00:08:17,430 --> 00:08:18,550 Thank you. 65 00:08:20,090 --> 00:08:21,190 Perfect. All right. 66 00:08:21,510 --> 00:08:22,390 So, thank you, Jenny. 67 00:08:22,570 --> 00:08:28,090 As mentioned, I'm Brooke Tisha with FCS and I do have Amanda Levine with me as well as John Gillarducci. 68 00:08:28,330 --> 00:08:34,930 And we're ready to just walk through those preliminary rates for the city's forecast as well as revenue requirements as well. 69 00:08:34,930 --> 00:08:37,490 refer to those as through the bulk of this presentation. 70 00:08:39,530 --> 00:08:43,370 So a quick agenda here to start, we're going to review a brief background. 71 00:08:43,810 --> 00:08:46,730 We're going to talk more about what a revenue requirement is. 72 00:08:46,990 --> 00:08:50,010 We'll review the city's fiscal policies and then we'll talk 73 00:08:50,010 --> 00:08:53,370 through the revenue requirement results for each utility before 74 00:08:53,370 --> 00:08:56,370 wrapping it up with next steps and questions or discussion. 75 00:08:59,170 --> 00:09:02,470 So here, again, just a brief background for each of the utilities 76 00:09:02,470 --> 00:09:04,070 that we're going to discuss this evening. 77 00:09:04,070 --> 00:09:10,910 First, the water utility, the infrastructure associated with the water utility is operated and maintained by the city, 78 00:09:11,410 --> 00:09:15,310 the city purchases their water supply through cascade water lines. 79 00:09:16,370 --> 00:09:21,250 Similarly, for the wastewater utility, the city operates and maintains the collection system, 80 00:09:21,610 --> 00:09:27,350 and uses that system to send wastewater to King County's treatment plants, who they pay for treatment services. 81 00:09:28,530 --> 00:09:32,950 On the surface water side, the city operates and maintains the surface water system, 82 00:09:32,950 --> 00:09:36,930 working to reduce street flooding and address the health of local water bodies. 83 00:09:37,610 --> 00:09:41,650 A surface water is unique and that it gets built through the county's property taxes, 84 00:09:41,930 --> 00:09:44,410 as to most customers don't see the bill as directly. 85 00:09:45,350 --> 00:09:51,610 And then finally, the city also provides garbage, recycling, and compost curbside collection services 86 00:09:51,610 --> 00:09:59,050 through waste management, which is also a contractor, and they pay disposal costs to King County for disposal services as well. 87 00:10:01,780 --> 00:10:07,060 So, for tonight's review, we're going to be concentrating on the revenue requirement for each utility. 88 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:18,600 When we talk about a revenue requirement, our goal was to determine the overall amount of revenue needed to satisfy all of the fiscal obligations of each utility on a standalone basis. 89 00:10:19,560 --> 00:10:28,640 Our fiscal obligations include our direct expenses, so those are things like our operating at maintenance costs, any existing debt service payments, 90 00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:34,400 and any new debt service payments or rate-funded capital that's needed to fund the capital program. 91 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:42,140 Those financial obligations also include indirect expenses, so those are things like maintaining our reserve balances, 92 00:10:42,800 --> 00:10:47,540 as well as debt service coverage ratios if we're a utility that has a large amount of debt. 93 00:10:47,740 --> 00:10:51,560 The city of Kirkland is not within their utilities currently. 94 00:10:52,860 --> 00:11:04,240 For this exercise, we compare a forecast of those obligations to our revenues at their existing levels first to determine whether those revenues are sufficient over the forecast period. 95 00:11:04,860 --> 00:11:12,040 And if we see a forecasted deficiency throughout that study period, we can develop a rate plan to help satisfy that deficiency. 96 00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:16,780 Well, ideally trying to minimize impacts to customers to the extent possible. 97 00:11:16,780 --> 00:11:22,080 And that's going to be our main concentration tonight, revenue requirements for each utility 98 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:26,700 over a multi-year period, or in other words, how much do we need to potentially raise 99 00:11:26,700 --> 00:11:27,980 our rates over that timeframe. 100 00:11:31,020 --> 00:11:36,080 So before we dive into the results, we want to set the stage first with a review of the city's 101 00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:37,000 financial policies. 102 00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:43,340 These policies provide some guardrails for the study to help encourage consistent decision-making 103 00:11:43,340 --> 00:11:48,800 over time, especially when we have documented fiscal policies like the city does, those 104 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:52,320 It was allowed for consistency even a staff and leadership changes. 105 00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:57,660 So first here we have our working capital contingency, which is in place to allow the utility 106 00:11:57,660 --> 00:12:04,540 to weather those day to day cash flow fluctuations, the target is 45 days of O&M for water 107 00:12:04,540 --> 00:12:05,340 and sewer. 108 00:12:05,940 --> 00:12:10,520 It's 100 days of O&M for storm water and 30 days for solid waste. 109 00:12:11,140 --> 00:12:14,900 We do see a higher target for storm water here because it's built through those property 110 00:12:14,900 --> 00:12:20,660 taxes again and has two larger influx of revenues rather than more of a steady monthly stream. 111 00:12:21,940 --> 00:12:27,060 A water and sewer utilities also have another operating contingency layer. It's for a similar 112 00:12:27,060 --> 00:12:33,600 purpose to help weather those cash flow fluctuations. This resulted in an additional 12% of ONM 113 00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:42,200 held as a reserve target. Together that's just about 90 days. The water sewer and surface water 114 00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:48,620 utilities also have capital contingency targets to provide a source of funding for emergency repairs 115 00:12:48,620 --> 00:12:55,860 or capital cost overruns. In each case, that target is about 10% of the six year CIP program. 116 00:12:57,380 --> 00:13:02,880 And then finally, the water sewer and surface water utilities also aim to fund a dedicated amount 117 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:08,660 of capital investment directly from rates to treat that infrastructure investment like a true cost 118 00:13:08,660 --> 00:13:16,320 operating those utilities. Water will seek to fund 125% of annual depreciation costs through rates, 119 00:13:16,900 --> 00:13:21,980 sewer will aim to fund 165% of depreciation costs and surface water will seek to fund a 120 00:13:21,980 --> 00:13:27,680 100% of depreciation. This invests the system investment policy really helps ensure that we're 121 00:13:27,680 --> 00:13:33,340 replacing system infrastructure as we're using it. A solid waste doesn't have those added capital 122 00:13:33,340 --> 00:13:38,080 contingency or a system investment component since the utilities largely contractual costs 123 00:13:38,080 --> 00:13:40,080 rather than that direct infrastructure investment. 124 00:13:42,700 --> 00:13:43,420 Yeah, go ahead. 125 00:13:43,620 --> 00:13:45,960 I see a question or a hand raised. 126 00:13:46,220 --> 00:13:47,440 I can raise just one of them. 127 00:13:47,580 --> 00:13:50,300 I can comment to the council that there's a lot of information. 128 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:51,740 Could be presented by please. 129 00:13:52,100 --> 00:13:53,680 If you have a question during the presentation. 130 00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:56,140 Please feel free to raise your hand. 131 00:13:56,420 --> 00:13:58,000 I'm going to ask it as we're going. 132 00:13:58,760 --> 00:14:01,120 I see another one. 133 00:14:01,560 --> 00:14:01,720 Jay. 134 00:14:02,560 --> 00:14:03,540 Thank you, Curtin. 135 00:14:03,580 --> 00:14:04,240 Thank you, Brooke. 136 00:14:04,240 --> 00:14:13,520 I'm wondering if you could talk a little bit about why sewer and water have different depreciation 137 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:18,600 numbers because it seems like that infrastructure would be similar to me. 138 00:14:19,300 --> 00:14:24,240 And if we don't have that information, it would be something that I would like some follow 139 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:25,020 up off on. 140 00:14:25,300 --> 00:14:26,780 Thank you. 141 00:14:26,780 --> 00:14:30,640 It's like Tracy will weigh on we and on that first perhaps. 142 00:14:34,590 --> 00:14:35,510 You're on, yeah. 143 00:14:37,290 --> 00:14:39,290 Thank you. Sorry, but my connection is okay. 144 00:14:39,970 --> 00:14:48,010 A really quick answer is that the sewer utility assets were put in place over a much longer period of time. 145 00:14:48,250 --> 00:14:52,490 The water utility assets were put in place over a much longer period of time. 146 00:14:52,490 --> 00:14:59,970 sewer only became a required service really in sort of the city. 147 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:06,660 60, the 50s and 60s, where the water utility was built all the way back, you know, starting at the turn of the century. 148 00:15:07,440 --> 00:15:14,080 And so, so the sewer assets are actually more concentrated in terms of when they reach their age. 149 00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:25,480 And the other thing I just wanted to say quickly about this minimum amount of investment is this is just trying to recognize that the replacements are going to end and flow over time. 150 00:15:25,480 --> 00:15:31,260 there'll be bigger and some years smaller in others, but this is a minimum amount to at least recognize 151 00:15:31,260 --> 00:15:39,380 an expected failure rate with the actual projects prioritized as part of the system plan, 152 00:15:39,580 --> 00:15:45,280 the actual replacements, but it really has to do with the fact that the sewer assets were added 153 00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:53,140 in a much more concentrated time period before that at best it was going into septic systems before 154 00:15:53,140 --> 00:15:57,200 For that, it was just going where it went, naturally. 155 00:15:58,360 --> 00:15:58,900 Thank you, Tracy. 156 00:16:03,340 --> 00:16:04,000 I'll head back. 157 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:04,600 Perfect. 158 00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:05,440 Thank you. 159 00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:06,340 Okay. 160 00:16:06,820 --> 00:16:11,580 So we're going to move on now to our first set of revenue requirement results and concentrating 161 00:16:11,580 --> 00:16:13,040 here on the water utility. 162 00:16:14,720 --> 00:16:19,400 In order to build the financial forecast, we have to include a few assumptions. 163 00:16:19,880 --> 00:16:25,660 First, we'll concentrate on the 2026-2032 timeframe as that results study period. 164 00:16:25,660 --> 00:16:29,920 with 2027 to 2028 as the identified rate setting timeframe. 165 00:16:30,860 --> 00:16:36,400 For the water utility, the combined reserve target is $7.2 million in 2027, 166 00:16:36,980 --> 00:16:42,100 and that includes both the operating and working capital reserves as well as the capital contingency. 167 00:16:43,380 --> 00:16:47,400 For rate revenue projections, we did work with the city to look historical, 168 00:16:47,500 --> 00:16:53,460 look back historically at revenue performance, and the associated heat and precipitation data 169 00:16:53,460 --> 00:16:57,500 to try to ensure that we're forecasting revenues on a normalized usage year. 170 00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:01,860 2025 was a more normalized usage year and our 26th 171 00:17:01,860 --> 00:17:05,980 budgeted revenue is in alignment with growth assumptions plus actual performance. 172 00:17:07,000 --> 00:17:13,620 I'm forecasting future revenues assumes a 0.9% growth rate on average and it also assumes that the 173 00:17:13,620 --> 00:17:20,160 Kirkland Care's program participation increases by 10% per year as more customers join that program. 174 00:17:20,160 --> 00:17:28,180 On the expense side of things, the city's 2026 to 2028 budgets provide the baseline for expense forecasting, 175 00:17:28,900 --> 00:17:31,800 increasing into the future with inflationary assumptions. 176 00:17:33,040 --> 00:17:40,300 Costs inflation varies by expense type between 2.5 to 5.5% for many of the internal expenses, 177 00:17:41,360 --> 00:17:48,500 total cost increase by about 5.7 on average, which is really driven largely by those cascade water alliance increases, 178 00:17:48,500 --> 00:17:53,340 that range from 4.9 to 12.8% depending on the year. 179 00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:59,620 Cascade water alliance makes up about 38% of overall water utility costs in 2026. 180 00:18:00,200 --> 00:18:07,580 That shares projected to increase to 43% by 2032 as their increased outpace those internal city costs. 181 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:14,640 And then finally here we are anticipating that the water utility will need a new bond to help fund the capital program 182 00:18:14,640 --> 00:18:18,660 and are forecasting that debt to be a revenue bond with the 20-year term, 183 00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:22,080 a 5% interest rate and a 1% issuance cost. 184 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:26,420 The total capital plan for the water utility is $42 million 185 00:18:26,420 --> 00:18:28,040 over the next six years. 186 00:18:30,860 --> 00:18:33,540 So here's just taking a closer look at the, yep. 187 00:18:34,220 --> 00:18:37,280 Sorry, before you go on question on the previous slide. 188 00:18:39,020 --> 00:18:43,400 So when you talk about customer growth and this is my question is on all utilities, 189 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:51,120 is the 0.9% per year, is that an industry standard and my question really is is that 190 00:18:51,780 --> 00:18:59,600 anticipating growth based on our comprehensive plan and our CPPs or is that just a 191 00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:04,020 general growth number? So it's not necessarily industry standard and it's much 192 00:19:04,020 --> 00:19:08,480 more tailored to the city of Kirkland and staff did take a look recently on 193 00:19:08,480 --> 00:19:12,660 number of new connections, as well as some near-term history on that. 194 00:19:13,260 --> 00:19:18,280 Typically, we don't always align from a rate setting perspective with comprehensive plans 195 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:23,100 because those can typically be a little bit more robust in their growth assumptions because 196 00:19:23,100 --> 00:19:26,040 engineers have a different reason for looking at growth. 197 00:19:26,220 --> 00:19:27,700 They want to be a little bit more robust. 198 00:19:27,860 --> 00:19:31,360 They don't want to dig up the street more than wants to give an example there. 199 00:19:31,700 --> 00:19:35,280 So when we're working through growth on the rate setting side of things, we like to look 200 00:19:35,280 --> 00:19:41,100 some near-term actuals. Sometimes we'll look at some connection charge revenues to give us a good idea 201 00:19:41,100 --> 00:19:44,960 of the number of connections we've been seeing over the last year or two and try to basically 202 00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:49,820 run that. That's helpful that just it's based on Kirkland, not 203 00:19:50,420 --> 00:19:52,960 absolutely. Yeah, thank you. 204 00:19:56,060 --> 00:19:59,760 So here just taking a closer look at the water utility component. 205 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:07,680 We have $17.2 million in rate revenue growing to about $18 million with that customer growth element by 2032. 206 00:20:08,300 --> 00:20:15,500 Those revenues are in support of O&M expenses that range from $15.2 million to $20.8 million with inflation. 207 00:20:16,520 --> 00:20:22,420 Annual system reimbursement targets increasing from $2.3 million to $3.1 million. 208 00:20:22,520 --> 00:20:28,420 Excessing debt service is just over 100,000 annually for the utility and I believe that will be fully repaid by 2033. 209 00:20:28,420 --> 00:20:34,920 And then we are assuming some future debt service to a link about 1.1 million. 210 00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:42,480 Once the $12.5 million revenue bond is issued to help fund the city's south for a replacement project in 211 00:20:42,480 --> 00:20:43,760 2026 and 27. 212 00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:52,420 The total 42 million in capital costs is funded by a mix of direct rate funding at 51% 213 00:20:52,940 --> 00:20:57,160 30% from the $12.5 million revenue bond 214 00:20:57,160 --> 00:21:03,200 CFC revenues make up about 19% and then we just have a small amount of developer contributions 215 00:21:03,200 --> 00:21:07,440 about 200,000 to round out that capital funding pie there. 216 00:21:11,140 --> 00:21:16,860 So in this graph here, we're going to pull together all of the direct obligations of 217 00:21:16,860 --> 00:21:18,660 the water utility and the bars. 218 00:21:19,060 --> 00:21:24,760 The dark blue or the internal, ohanem expenses, the light blue bar represents our cascade water 219 00:21:24,760 --> 00:21:30,820 Alliance expenses, Navy blue or the Cascade Water Alliance membership do's, and then we 220 00:21:30,820 --> 00:21:35,960 see the green bars are direct rates under capital, with the yellow bar first appearing 221 00:21:35,960 --> 00:21:38,820 in 2027 as the additional debt service. 222 00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:44,580 If we compare those four casted costs to our revenues at existing rates, we see that we're 223 00:21:44,580 --> 00:21:48,880 just meeting obligations in 2026, maybe a slight efficiency there. 224 00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:55,960 However, as removing into 27 and beyond, we would become deficient to fund our rate-funded capital in 2027 225 00:21:55,960 --> 00:22:00,300 and we would not be sufficient to cover our new debt service by 2029. 226 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:04,640 And eventually, our water purchase costs as we continue through the study period. 227 00:22:05,600 --> 00:22:11,880 So in order to satisfy that deficiency, we're looking at an 8.5% rating increase in 2027, 228 00:22:11,880 --> 00:22:20,040 followed by 6.5% from 2028 to 2030 dropping to about 5.15% through 2032. 229 00:22:21,060 --> 00:22:28,020 This rate strategy results in a single-family bill impact of approximately $4.81 in 2027 and 230 00:22:28,020 --> 00:22:30,080 just under $4.28. 231 00:22:31,940 --> 00:22:37,740 The somewhat front-loaded rate strategy would allow the water utility to satisfy the operating 232 00:22:37,740 --> 00:22:41,900 and capital contingency targets in all years of this study period, 233 00:22:45,620 --> 00:22:46,760 which is shown in this 234 00:22:46,760 --> 00:22:52,180 graph here. So with the proposed strategy in place, we would meet our target beginning in 235 00:22:52,180 --> 00:22:59,400 2027 on the operating side and stay at that target through 232. On the capital reserve side, 236 00:22:59,680 --> 00:23:05,600 our use of debt and the continued commitment to fund our system reinvestment target allows the 237 00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:11,160 reserves to build in preparation for some of those unknown capital infrastructure needs that are 238 00:23:11,160 --> 00:23:14,220 going to be coming from the soon to be completed water system plan. 239 00:23:15,440 --> 00:23:19,760 The orange line on these graphs has shown to illustrate the effects of the fund balance 240 00:23:19,760 --> 00:23:22,840 if we were to hold our rates at the existing levels. 241 00:23:23,400 --> 00:23:28,360 So as we saw on the revenue requirement graph, that would result in forecast to deficiencies 242 00:23:28,360 --> 00:23:33,140 that would ultimately deplete reserves on both the operating and eventually the capital 243 00:23:33,140 --> 00:23:33,560 site. 244 00:23:36,790 --> 00:23:41,630 That's pause for a second, I'll see if maybe I have any questions, so literally it's 245 00:23:46,270 --> 00:23:47,430 not a quick water drink. 246 00:23:49,010 --> 00:23:50,230 Okay, there we go. 247 00:23:50,430 --> 00:23:51,990 How can I count the mirror print? 248 00:23:54,460 --> 00:23:58,640 Yeah, I wanted to actually, the quality that I should have asked this question earlier, 249 00:23:58,960 --> 00:24:03,940 but I think it was two slides ago where you talk about the maintenance, 250 00:24:04,360 --> 00:24:10,100 and yeah, this one here at the O&M is, can you just maybe, 251 00:24:10,100 --> 00:24:13,120 Because it looks like that's one of the, you know, 252 00:24:13,260 --> 00:24:15,980 it is the largest expense that we have. 253 00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:19,100 So, can you just walk us through very briefly? 254 00:24:20,580 --> 00:24:24,740 Like, what is, like, is that an increase in these types 255 00:24:24,740 --> 00:24:26,980 of expenses as compared to prior years? 256 00:24:27,300 --> 00:24:29,120 And kind of, what is the primary driver? 257 00:24:30,280 --> 00:24:32,600 So, yeah, when we look at this particular 258 00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:36,440 on an expense line going from 15.2 to 20.8 million, 259 00:24:36,760 --> 00:24:39,920 this is both a combination of the city's internal budget. 260 00:24:39,920 --> 00:24:42,340 So that's their, you know, personnel, their benefits, 261 00:24:43,020 --> 00:24:45,580 their all of the services that they provide internally. 262 00:24:45,920 --> 00:24:49,060 It also includes the cascade water alliance components. 263 00:24:49,620 --> 00:24:52,340 So on the internal side, I'm going to flip back here for just a second. 264 00:24:52,400 --> 00:24:54,220 So we can talk about the expense inflation. 265 00:24:55,300 --> 00:24:59,800 Internally, salaries, benefits, all of those expenses that the city is. 266 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:16,040 Parts of or can control are increasing by between the 2.5 to 5.5%. And we'll typically see the higher increases related to things like benefit costs, because that's what we've seen in the industry, just in real terms, really increases there. 267 00:25:16,040 --> 00:25:32,150 What we see as a bigger driver, though, really is the cascade water alliance increases, and they become a larger, proportional share over this timeframe and are driving up those own end costs closer to that 6% over time. 268 00:25:33,700 --> 00:25:35,960 So it is a combination of internal and external. 269 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:41,300 Anyone else? 270 00:25:43,340 --> 00:25:43,620 Okay. 271 00:25:43,800 --> 00:25:44,280 Go ahead. 272 00:25:44,760 --> 00:25:45,240 All right. 273 00:25:46,440 --> 00:25:55,960 So, as we move into our discussion here for the sewer utility, we're going to see a similar layout to these slides and materials with similar topics that we'll talk about for each. 274 00:25:57,260 --> 00:26:07,000 So, similar time frame for each utility, we're going to concentrate on 2026 to 2032 study period with the 27 to 28 concentration for rate setting. 275 00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:14,660 For the sewer utility that combined operating capital reserve targets total, just under $8 million in 2027, 276 00:26:15,720 --> 00:26:22,260 and similarly for revenue forecasting purposes, oh, do we have a hand or was that in? 277 00:26:22,320 --> 00:26:24,380 I think that was the original hand. 278 00:26:24,720 --> 00:26:25,740 That was very good. 279 00:26:29,070 --> 00:26:29,350 Perfect. 280 00:26:29,690 --> 00:26:30,550 Thank you. 281 00:26:30,990 --> 00:26:38,910 For revenue forecasting purposes, again, here we did base the 2026 forecast off of 25 actuals plus growth, 282 00:26:38,910 --> 00:26:44,010 in the end 25 being a more normalized historical year there, and here we're assuming average 283 00:26:44,010 --> 00:26:50,070 system growth of about 0.7% annually. Just like water, we assumed that the Kirkland 284 00:26:50,070 --> 00:26:55,250 Care's participation would also increase by 10% per year as more customers took advantage of 285 00:26:55,250 --> 00:27:01,750 that program. On the expense side of things, again, we're utilizing the city's 2026-2028 286 00:27:01,750 --> 00:27:08,570 budget as the baseline and adding inflation to those future years, those internal costs will inflate 287 00:27:08,570 --> 00:27:14,050 between two and a half to five and a half percent really depending on again that expense type. 288 00:27:14,430 --> 00:27:21,770 Overall, O&M is increasing by 10.7% annually. And again, this is really driven by external factors 289 00:27:21,770 --> 00:27:28,810 related to King County treatment rate increases that range from 11.25 to 12.75% annually. 290 00:27:29,990 --> 00:27:35,510 Like we saw on water, King County is becoming a larger share of utility expenses over time, 291 00:27:35,510 --> 00:27:42,190 Starting at 44% of total costs in 2026, projected to increase to 56% of total 292 00:27:42,190 --> 00:27:44,030 super utility costs by 2032. 293 00:27:45,710 --> 00:27:51,410 No new debt is forecast to fund the total capital program of about 31.1 million dollars in 294 00:27:51,410 --> 00:27:53,870 escalated project costs on the sewer utility side. 295 00:27:57,430 --> 00:27:58,890 So again here we're going to take a closer 296 00:27:58,890 --> 00:28:05,310 look at the key components. For sewer we show existing revenue of 20.9 million growing to 30.8 million 297 00:28:05,310 --> 00:28:10,790 by 2032. Again, just with that growth assumption, those revenues are in support of 298 00:28:10,790 --> 00:28:17,230 O&M expenses of 18.1 million and 26, increasing to 33.3 million. And again, this 299 00:28:17,230 --> 00:28:22,250 is one of those areas that's largely driven by those external King County treatment expenses. 300 00:28:23,590 --> 00:28:29,250 I'm systemry investment for sewer starts at 3.9 million and 2026 increasing to 4.8 by 301 00:28:29,250 --> 00:28:35,090 2032 and pretty similar with water existing debt services just over a hundred thousand dollars 302 00:28:35,090 --> 00:28:41,330 annually. For the sewer utility, we don't have any new future debt service to fund the capital plan, 303 00:28:41,590 --> 00:28:47,090 and that total of about 31.1 million in capital projects is planned to be funded through direct 304 00:28:47,090 --> 00:28:53,910 rate-funded capital of about 82% and about 18% from CFCs. We have just about 100,000 dollars 305 00:28:53,910 --> 00:28:58,570 planned from developer contributions there, so the bulk is really great and CFC funded. 306 00:29:02,860 --> 00:29:07,280 Okay, so bringing together the direct obligations for the sewer utility here, 307 00:29:07,280 --> 00:29:12,220 the bars are representing those obligations with the dark blue bar being our internal city 308 00:29:12,220 --> 00:29:18,200 onem expenses. The light blue or teen county wastewater treatment charges followed by 309 00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:23,460 rate-funded capital in the green bar. So what we see here when we compare our forecasted 310 00:29:23,460 --> 00:29:28,800 obligations to our revenues that existing rates is that we're forecasting a deficiency in 311 00:29:28,800 --> 00:29:36,620 2026. In order to fund our full rate-funded system investment target of 165% of depreciation, 312 00:29:36,620 --> 00:29:43,020 we will need to utilize operating reserves. Moving forward without any rate action, 313 00:29:43,220 --> 00:29:48,320 which is noted by that solid black bar in the graph, we'd be deficient to fund our rate 314 00:29:48,320 --> 00:29:53,380 funded system investment fully by 2028 and we wouldn't be able to fund our King County treatment 315 00:29:53,380 --> 00:29:59,980 charges by the 2029 or 2030 timeframe, at least in full. So in order to correct the 316 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:29,840 Fishing C in 2027. While maintaining our rate funded system reinvestment at 165% of depreciation, as well as maintaining the operating reserve at a minimum of 2 million. The sewer utility is looking at a 19.5% increase in 2027 followed by about 8.95% annually thereafter. The typical single family customer would see an increase at $16.25 a month from this change in 2027. 317 00:30:30,360 --> 00:30:34,720 followed by monthly increase of about $13.37 in 2020-28. 318 00:30:35,200 --> 00:30:37,500 It should be noted here that a single family 319 00:30:37,500 --> 00:30:39,720 sur-customer will see the King County portion 320 00:30:39,720 --> 00:30:42,080 of their bill directly passed through, 321 00:30:42,520 --> 00:30:45,900 which is a large rate driver, especially a 20-28 and beyond. 322 00:30:50,540 --> 00:30:55,100 The thing on, oh, wait, yeah, I was gonna wrap it up real quick 323 00:30:55,100 --> 00:30:56,060 and then I'll pause. 324 00:30:56,420 --> 00:30:58,360 But here, just taking a look at the operating 325 00:30:58,360 --> 00:31:00,880 and the capital reserves for the sewer utility, 326 00:31:00,880 --> 00:31:07,600 we are starting 2026 below target on the operating fund. The rate strategy that we're proposing 327 00:31:07,600 --> 00:31:13,360 does not immediately correct the fund balance deficiency, and instead slowly grows the reserve 328 00:31:13,360 --> 00:31:19,480 back to target through 2032. The upfront rate increase proposed would keep the reserve above 329 00:31:19,480 --> 00:31:25,860 $2 million in 2027 and correct the initial cash flow deficiency while still funding rate 330 00:31:25,860 --> 00:31:31,200 it's just to reinvestment out those target levels. On the capital side, we see balances ending 331 00:31:31,200 --> 00:31:37,560 2026 at just above $10 million, that reserve would grow with continued rate funding in 332 00:31:37,560 --> 00:31:44,340 2032 about 1525 million. A similar to water, again, with upcoming system plan needs, it can be 333 00:31:44,340 --> 00:31:48,900 prudent to maintain those reserve balances and preparation for some of those unknown costs. 334 00:31:51,210 --> 00:31:54,510 Happy to pause. Thank you, bro. 335 00:31:59,850 --> 00:32:01,050 Council any questions? 336 00:32:09,790 --> 00:32:10,750 Okay, we'll go ahead. 337 00:32:11,630 --> 00:32:11,850 All right. 338 00:32:11,870 --> 00:32:12,190 All right. 339 00:32:12,210 --> 00:32:15,330 So next, we're going to review preliminary surface water outcomes. 340 00:32:16,670 --> 00:32:18,230 And again, there's similar layout. 341 00:32:18,350 --> 00:32:20,950 We're going to show you results through 2032, 342 00:32:21,570 --> 00:32:24,830 with the rate sitting period concentrating on 2027 and 2028. 343 00:32:25,470 --> 00:32:27,250 The 100 day O&M target, 344 00:32:27,490 --> 00:32:30,850 plus the 10% of the CIP results in a six million dollar 345 00:32:30,850 --> 00:32:33,990 combined reserve target in 2027 for surface water. 346 00:32:33,990 --> 00:32:39,850 And here we typically, again, see more steady revenues, but we reviewed the forecast with 347 00:32:39,850 --> 00:32:42,650 that same thought process for forecasting our revenues. 348 00:32:42,850 --> 00:32:47,290 So determining whether our 2020 sixth budget was an alignment with a forecast of 25 349 00:32:47,290 --> 00:32:51,390 actual plus growth and any associated rating increase. 350 00:32:52,330 --> 00:32:57,890 Stormwater utility grows, averages about a half a percent annually, and it also represents 351 00:32:57,890 --> 00:33:03,510 a senior discount participation rate growing at about 10 percent annually, which has 352 00:33:03,510 --> 00:33:10,590 administered by the county. For expense forecasting, we'll rely again on the cities 2026 to 2028 budgets, 353 00:33:10,890 --> 00:33:18,030 plus inflation. Inflation varies here for for surface water between the 2.5 to 5.5% depending on 354 00:33:18,030 --> 00:33:24,330 the type of expense. And then overall operating expenses are increasing just under 3% in the forecast 355 00:33:24,950 --> 00:33:30,090 because there really are no external cost drivers for the surface water utility to be perhaps 356 00:33:30,090 --> 00:33:35,910 pushing that up. We are also not forecasting any new debt for the surface water utility at this 357 00:33:35,910 --> 00:33:41,530 point to help fund that $31.7 million capital plan through $232. 358 00:33:44,350 --> 00:33:49,470 So looking at the key components here for surface water, we have about $14 million in existing 359 00:33:49,470 --> 00:33:54,590 rate revenues, growing to $14.2 million with customer growth. That is in support of 360 00:33:54,590 --> 00:33:58,870 that range from 12.8 million to 15.2 million, 361 00:33:59,510 --> 00:34:02,050 system reinvestment funding of 3.1 million, 362 00:34:02,170 --> 00:34:03,790 increasing to 3.6 million, 363 00:34:04,770 --> 00:34:07,630 and then the stormwater utility currently has no existing debt 364 00:34:07,630 --> 00:34:11,190 and no future forecasted debt to fund the capital program. 365 00:34:12,130 --> 00:34:15,190 A direct, rate-funded capital is anticipated to fund 366 00:34:15,190 --> 00:34:17,710 77% of the capital program, 367 00:34:18,050 --> 00:34:20,490 with 16% coming from external funding. 368 00:34:20,490 --> 00:34:28,370 That external funding is made up of a Department of Ecology for Givable Loan, as well as some developers, developer contributions. 369 00:34:29,130 --> 00:34:34,550 And then finally, we've got CFC revenue that's going to make up the remaining 7% of our funding needs for stormwater. 370 00:34:36,980 --> 00:34:46,200 So here again in our revenue requirement forecast, we see those blue bars representing our own MX fences, and then the green bar here is showing direct, great funded capital, 371 00:34:46,200 --> 00:34:59,980 Comparing those obligations to existing revenues in 2026, we see the surface water utility is also forecast to be deficient to fully cover the 100% depreciation target for rate-funded capital in order to 372 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:06,320 Fund, the full targeted amount, the utility would need to rely a bit on reserves. Moving forward, if 373 00:35:06,320 --> 00:35:11,020 though rate action is taken, the utility would fall short to provide any rate-funded capital 374 00:35:11,020 --> 00:35:15,840 by 2020-9, and would eventually not be able to cover their total ONM expenses in the future. 375 00:35:17,000 --> 00:35:25,180 So in order to satisfy that deficiency, we're looking at 7.15% increases from 2027-329 before dropping 376 00:35:25,180 --> 00:35:32,280 to 2.75 percent thereafter. This strategy is set with the intent to resolve the cash flow 377 00:35:32,280 --> 00:35:40,300 deficiency by 2029 and utilize available fund balance to do so. A 7.15 percent increase 378 00:35:40,300 --> 00:35:48,420 results in an increase of between $1.65 and $1.77 a month in 2027 and 2028 for a typical 379 00:35:48,420 --> 00:35:54,080 single family customer and again these rates are on property taxes. So I have a little bit less 380 00:35:54,080 --> 00:35:57,580 visibility than some of our water sewer or salt waste rates. 381 00:36:00,590 --> 00:36:04,070 Finally here, looking at fund balances for the storm water utility, 382 00:36:04,450 --> 00:36:10,210 we do see on the operating side that we have available fund balance in 2026 that allows 383 00:36:10,210 --> 00:36:14,510 us to phase in the rating phase and whether the cash flow deficiency 384 00:36:14,510 --> 00:36:20,390 over a three year period. So here fund balance is neat or slightly exceed the operating 385 00:36:20,390 --> 00:36:24,950 target in all years of the forecast period with this rate strategy in place. 386 00:36:24,950 --> 00:36:30,450 The capital fund will seek growth in reserves as the city continues to fund the full rate fund 387 00:36:30,450 --> 00:36:35,870 system reinvestment target growing until 2031 when the city has a large capital expenditure 388 00:36:35,870 --> 00:36:39,830 and the reserve will fall but will never fall below the target. 389 00:36:42,800 --> 00:36:47,700 We'll pause here for just a second before I hand it to a man there. 390 00:36:55,310 --> 00:36:56,670 All right, I see no questions. 391 00:36:58,530 --> 00:36:59,290 Yeah, go ahead. 392 00:36:59,690 --> 00:37:00,310 Okay, perfect. 393 00:37:00,310 --> 00:37:08,410 I will pass it to Amanda to walk through the solid waste discussion and you'll notice a lot of consistency with these slides as well. 394 00:37:08,630 --> 00:37:09,590 So go ahead Amanda. 395 00:37:10,710 --> 00:37:13,970 Great. Thank you, Brooke. Can you all hear me? Okay. Okay, perfect. 396 00:37:15,590 --> 00:37:21,590 And as we went through the slides before just feel free to try men if there are any questions that come up on the solid waste utility. 397 00:37:22,590 --> 00:37:29,450 So right now we're looking at the similar screen that we saw for the other utilities with our study data assumptions here. 398 00:37:29,450 --> 00:37:37,170 here. Our period for the study is going to be that 2026 to 2032 timeframe. And we're looking 399 00:37:37,170 --> 00:37:44,550 at meeting the specific solid waste reserve target of 3 million in 2027. This equates to about 400 00:37:44,550 --> 00:37:50,990 30 days of operating expenses for the utility. With that customer growth, so we're looking 401 00:37:50,990 --> 00:37:56,590 at an average of 0.6 in customer growth from that timeframe moving on. That's an average 402 00:37:56,590 --> 00:38:02,530 looking at different kinds of customer classes, like residential, commercial, multi-family. 403 00:38:03,650 --> 00:38:09,230 And then we're looking at an annual rate revenue of about 32.3 million in 2026, 404 00:38:10,110 --> 00:38:15,130 which we will need rate increases to keep pace with the expensive inflation that's happening 405 00:38:15,130 --> 00:38:17,330 as you can see in the dark green box. 406 00:38:17,750 --> 00:38:26,210 So as Brooke mentioned earlier we have internal costs that are increasing from about 2.5 to 5.5% each year. 407 00:38:26,210 --> 00:38:38,710 But there are also contractual costs like the waste management contract and other King County disposal items that are increasing at a higher rate than some of those internal factors. 408 00:38:39,530 --> 00:38:55,250 And just to touch on the makeup of those O&M expenses, about 75% of the budget for the solid waste utility are those contractual costs, so that becomes a really big portion of the expenses that need to be covered. 409 00:38:56,570 --> 00:39:03,350 Because of those large contractual costs, there are no city-specific CIP items, and there's 410 00:39:03,350 --> 00:39:05,390 no new debt for the utility either. 411 00:39:06,070 --> 00:39:13,010 So on the next slide, we can look at a slightly condensed version of that revenue requirement 412 00:39:13,010 --> 00:39:13,610 summary. 413 00:39:13,710 --> 00:39:19,870 There are no capital costs, the system reinvestment and debt aren't a huge portion or a part 414 00:39:19,870 --> 00:39:21,910 of at all of the solid waste utility. 415 00:39:21,910 --> 00:39:29,510 So you can see in the first box there in 2026, we have our cash operating expenses in the blue. 416 00:39:30,150 --> 00:39:37,050 Our waste management charges in that teal blue and then King County charges in the more greenish teal color. 417 00:39:37,710 --> 00:39:43,310 So really the majority of those costs are based on contract kind of outside sources. 418 00:39:43,310 --> 00:39:54,610 In 2027, the utility requires a 6.75v increase to be able to meet that specific target outlined in the previous slide. 419 00:39:55,430 --> 00:39:59,970 So right now, there is a slight deficiency in what is being kept in... 420 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:07,340 In the solid waste utilities fund balance, and so that's 6.5% right stop fund balance within the first year. 421 00:40:08,160 --> 00:40:18,240 Pass 2027, the utility can keep a 3.95% rate increase in order to meet those contractual needs over the forecast period. 422 00:40:18,920 --> 00:40:28,560 But also anticipating that on a longer scale, we're going to try to meet that 30 day fund balance until 2042. 423 00:40:28,560 --> 00:40:37,260 I believe, or 2045 actually, so if we go to that next slide, I'm going to ask the question real quick. 424 00:40:37,640 --> 00:40:38,560 Oh yeah. 425 00:40:39,600 --> 00:40:40,300 That's a very proud. 426 00:40:40,520 --> 00:40:41,260 Go ahead. 427 00:40:46,240 --> 00:40:46,480 Shilta. 428 00:40:51,370 --> 00:40:52,070 There you go. 429 00:40:56,340 --> 00:40:57,420 Count's a very proud. 430 00:40:57,600 --> 00:40:58,060 Go ahead. 431 00:40:59,280 --> 00:41:01,700 The, the, I'm just looking at the game. 432 00:41:02,900 --> 00:41:04,020 Can you hear me? 433 00:41:04,360 --> 00:41:06,520 You're, you're breaking a, 434 00:41:12,990 --> 00:41:14,210 I think she's frozen. 435 00:41:15,030 --> 00:41:15,830 Can you hear me? 436 00:41:16,030 --> 00:41:17,030 Yes, go ahead. 437 00:41:24,680 --> 00:41:32,880 So, I was just looking back at the O&M expenses again and I just wanted to understand, like, the King, 438 00:41:35,790 --> 00:41:38,330 and 439 00:41:41,820 --> 00:41:44,780 that's through 2030, 440 00:41:48,420 --> 00:41:50,080 or, like, I guess that's one question. 441 00:41:50,500 --> 00:41:52,360 Like, how is that broken up? 442 00:41:54,470 --> 00:41:59,970 And that, and that, and that's great increases already. 443 00:42:04,640 --> 00:42:11,680 Council for your, you're, you're breaking up and we're having trouble, what you try to turn off your video and see if that helps. 444 00:42:21,380 --> 00:42:22,340 Try again. 445 00:42:27,340 --> 00:42:29,600 We're, we're having trouble hearing you. 446 00:42:31,680 --> 00:42:32,220 Okay. 447 00:42:35,510 --> 00:42:37,690 No, no worries. 448 00:42:38,370 --> 00:42:39,850 I'll ask it later. 449 00:42:40,830 --> 00:42:41,710 Thank you. 450 00:42:42,570 --> 00:42:44,170 Anyone else have questions? 451 00:42:46,770 --> 00:42:47,990 Okay. Go ahead, Amanda. 452 00:42:49,550 --> 00:42:50,150 Okay, thank you. 453 00:42:50,330 --> 00:42:54,370 And I will maybe try to anticipate what 454 00:42:54,370 --> 00:42:57,170 that was kind of asking about the King County disposal. 455 00:42:58,010 --> 00:43:00,290 That portion, even though our forecast is going 456 00:43:00,290 --> 00:43:03,590 on until 2032, we are continuing those costs 457 00:43:03,590 --> 00:43:06,090 throughout the full forecast as well. 458 00:43:06,190 --> 00:43:08,590 So those aren't just until 2032. 459 00:43:08,730 --> 00:43:11,690 So on this slide below the graph, 460 00:43:11,690 --> 00:43:29,370 We have an example bill for the 35 gallon bin and this is going to change by about three dollars in twenty twenty seven with that six point seven five rate increase and then about an average of of two dollars and 30 cents beyond that looking at twenty twenty nine. 461 00:43:30,650 --> 00:43:37,650 So if we go to the next slide and take a look at the fun balance assessment, so right now in 462 00:43:37,650 --> 00:43:47,930 2026 we see that blue bar which is below the 30 days of aluminum expenses. In 2027 we see that blue bar 463 00:43:47,930 --> 00:43:54,610 actually hit the black dotted line which means that the 6.7% is getting us to meet that target reserve. 464 00:43:54,610 --> 00:44:00,610 We do exceed those 30 days once we get to the mid part of our forecast, but we are also 465 00:44:01,230 --> 00:44:08,790 anticipating a planned contractual re-negotiation in 2032 and want to keep that in mind and keep our right increases. 466 00:44:09,630 --> 00:44:14,310 Having as at least meet our operating targets through the end of the full forecast. 467 00:44:15,270 --> 00:44:22,110 So the solid waste utility takes a little bit more of a long-term look because of the nature of those contracts 468 00:44:22,110 --> 00:44:27,010 than maybe water, sewer, or storm does when we're thinking about those written creases. 469 00:44:28,090 --> 00:44:34,810 For the 30 days, as well, this is something that, as Brooke explained in those previous slides, 470 00:44:35,050 --> 00:44:40,210 we are trying to get to in that first year, so that really is what the 6.75 is going towards 471 00:44:40,210 --> 00:44:41,570 not 30 days of operating. 472 00:44:44,790 --> 00:44:48,450 And I will wrap up the solid waste discussion there if there are 473 00:44:48,450 --> 00:44:51,050 any other questions in this utility? 474 00:44:52,070 --> 00:44:53,130 Council any questions? 475 00:44:56,890 --> 00:44:58,010 All right, go ahead. 476 00:44:59,130 --> 00:44:59,510 All right. 477 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:14,940 So, just in conclusion here, thanks to Amanda for that piece, we're going to bring back the combined bill summary here across the four preliminary research strategies that you saw today in inclusive of taxes and other fees. 478 00:45:15,400 --> 00:45:28,660 A typical single-family customer would see an impact of approximately $29.10 a month across all four utilities in 2027 that impact would decrease to about $20.65 a month in 2028. 479 00:45:29,560 --> 00:45:39,680 Projected rate impacts are forecasted through 2032, but just as a reminder, we're really concentrating on the rate setting period of 2027 and 2028 at this point. 480 00:45:42,080 --> 00:45:48,860 And then finally, while we showed you all a set of preliminary rate and capital funding strategies for each of the utilities tonight, 481 00:45:48,860 --> 00:45:56,780 We are working with city staff on additional rate scenarios that could include the following adjustments or levers, if you will. 482 00:45:57,200 --> 00:46:04,460 So first of all, we will bring back scenarios that include service package expenses to show their impacts on the rate strategies. 483 00:46:05,560 --> 00:46:17,720 In order to mitigate some upfront rate increases, we could look at meeting reserved targets by 2032 instead of immediately in 2027 for water surface water and solid waste. 484 00:46:18,860 --> 00:46:24,520 And primarily for sewer, we could look to reduce our system reinvestment funding contributions 485 00:46:24,520 --> 00:46:30,240 for a period of time to help mitigate those rate increases that are related to that fund balance 486 00:46:30,240 --> 00:46:37,960 recovery. The second two levers with guidance from Council could help to ease those near-term rate pressures. 487 00:46:41,570 --> 00:46:45,790 Yeah, that's nice to you, question. Council member Oath. 488 00:46:46,670 --> 00:46:51,430 Thank you. I'm looking forward to seeing some of these options when you're looking at 489 00:46:51,450 --> 00:47:03,450 Reserved targets, can we get multiple options for replenishment for some I'm curious about what are the impacts if we close over 490 00:47:04,410 --> 00:47:12,230 A biennium or two instead of all the way out to 232 and you may want to look at options that treat different utilities 491 00:47:12,230 --> 00:47:14,870 different. Absolutely. 492 00:47:14,870 --> 00:47:15,790 Yeah, 493 00:47:28,160 --> 00:47:29,400 it's a rare past goal. 494 00:47:31,560 --> 00:47:33,000 Thank you. 495 00:47:34,080 --> 00:47:36,140 Question or in a couple comments. 496 00:47:38,520 --> 00:47:42,840 One is, it's really, I really like the table at the beginning of the memo that 497 00:47:42,840 --> 00:47:47,720 Connect shows all the, the rating increases over the next six years for each of the individual 498 00:47:47,720 --> 00:47:50,620 Utilities by percentage. 499 00:47:51,980 --> 00:47:55,820 Could you, when, when you come back, could you just have an overall percentage 500 00:47:55,820 --> 00:48:03,220 image increased by year when you when you look at all of them together. Sure. That would be helpful. 501 00:48:05,780 --> 00:48:12,180 And then, you know, my second comment is, I don't. I'd love to hear someone disagree with this, 502 00:48:12,380 --> 00:48:19,920 but it feels like these, these reading creases are going to be really impactful, really impacting, 503 00:48:19,920 --> 00:48:29,040 cost of living, affordability, you name it, and I know that everyone's concerned about that, 504 00:48:30,440 --> 00:48:36,600 generally, but we tend to kind of compartmentalize things and say, oh well it's because of this 505 00:48:36,600 --> 00:48:42,120 little thing here, and then this thing over here, and then this rate over here, and this agency over 506 00:48:42,760 --> 00:48:49,420 here, and then it comes across as like we kind of struggle our shoulders and go up, there's nothing we 507 00:48:49,420 --> 00:48:57,600 do. And then we just move forward. And I guess I want to challenge that kind of thinking. 508 00:48:59,020 --> 00:49:05,400 And I know that we had conversations, regional rate, conversation. I know that we talk about 509 00:49:05,400 --> 00:49:13,370 this individually for the different utilities. I just would ask for probably something that's 510 00:49:13,370 --> 00:49:20,410 possible but just like more emphasis on like what can we do? Like what is in our purview that 511 00:49:20,410 --> 00:49:32,710 actually can a meaningful change? You know what's the the least bad option. So that's just something 512 00:49:32,710 --> 00:49:38,250 that's on my mind. It's a frustration of mine. I'm sure it's frustration of others as well. 513 00:49:38,250 --> 00:49:43,430 That's like I feel powerless. Thank you. Thank you, city manager. 514 00:49:46,020 --> 00:49:47,560 Yeah, so I think we all share 515 00:49:47,560 --> 00:49:53,580 that concern that these rates are going up, but the totality of them is not sustain up the community. 516 00:49:53,980 --> 00:49:59,220 You know, one of the reasons behind Kirk and Relic pushing for the regenerate summons was, you know, 517 00:49:59,400 --> 00:49:59,980 take this and y'all. 518 00:50:04,140 --> 00:50:11,900 That's just not something that can be sustained. So in the first summit, what we learned was that a big chunk of the increase is across all utilities, which is regulatory. 519 00:50:12,600 --> 00:50:27,360 And so to hear point about challenging assumptions, it's hard for us, particularly in the Pacific Northwest to think about, would you defer some environmental regulations, would you defer some climate commitments in order to save rate impacts, right? 520 00:50:27,360 --> 00:50:29,380 So those are the kind of things that need to happen on the original level. 521 00:50:29,520 --> 00:50:35,360 And we've been really pushing this new county executive to take out those affordability summons. 522 00:50:36,460 --> 00:50:39,180 Because across all of King County is a major player here. 523 00:50:39,280 --> 00:50:40,180 So it's huge and energy. 524 00:50:40,880 --> 00:50:42,660 So that's one way I think we're going to keep trying. 525 00:50:43,040 --> 00:50:46,360 And then we're looking very hard and everything we can do on the current side. 526 00:50:46,700 --> 00:50:48,220 I have to keep our own cost out. 527 00:50:48,720 --> 00:50:50,320 Well, so we definitely don't want to shrug. 528 00:50:50,660 --> 00:50:52,160 Yeah, we definitely don't do what we can. 529 00:50:52,380 --> 00:50:54,040 Trying to try to forward here. 530 00:50:54,280 --> 00:50:55,220 Thank you for that comment. 531 00:50:57,760 --> 00:50:58,320 Deputy Mayor. 532 00:51:00,590 --> 00:51:11,110 Thank you, Mayor, and thank you City Manager for reminding us about Kirkland's efforts on the regional, the utility summit. 533 00:51:12,930 --> 00:51:24,790 I'm looking forward to the second summit and whether we can start making more progress towards some concrete proposals from the larger group. 534 00:51:25,670 --> 00:51:28,410 I share the concern that customer and pastoral race. 535 00:51:28,490 --> 00:51:38,270 I think we all do acute concern, which is why, you know, to put it, I think to kind 536 00:51:38,270 --> 00:51:43,610 of add a plus one to account for a pastoral, everything that is in our control, one thing I 537 00:51:43,610 --> 00:51:50,270 appreciated was already in the proposals and the discussion are some suggestions for how to 538 00:51:50,270 --> 00:51:57,350 the rate increase. I just want to emphasize whatever's within our control setting the regional 539 00:51:57,350 --> 00:52:02,710 rate summit aside and some of the strategies that may come out of that. Whatever is in our 540 00:52:02,710 --> 00:52:09,670 control, I want us to bring all that to bear and I appreciate the staff's initiative already 541 00:52:09,670 --> 00:52:16,170 in identifying some of those things. But again, if it's in our control, I'd like to see it as part of 542 00:52:16,170 --> 00:52:22,390 our proposal at least to understand what it would mean and what its impact would be. 543 00:52:23,010 --> 00:52:24,570 So, I just want to add my voice to that. Thanks. 544 00:52:25,410 --> 00:52:27,310 Thank you. Councilmember Kran, welcome back. 545 00:52:27,990 --> 00:52:30,530 Okay, let's see if this works. I hope you can have a good. 546 00:52:30,550 --> 00:52:31,170 Okay, perfect. 547 00:52:32,630 --> 00:52:44,850 So I completely echo what others have said regarding just how impactful these rate increases potentially can be if they continue to be those rates in the future. 548 00:52:44,850 --> 00:53:01,890 And I think I just like to understand what is our primary mechanism to now now that we know what is going to be kind of the input into these potentially increases in rates. 549 00:53:02,810 --> 00:53:13,430 What are our next steps to, I don't know, assign individuals within the city to say, all right, you go. 550 00:53:13,430 --> 00:53:18,170 And you're going to go and work on these regional efforts. 551 00:53:18,570 --> 00:53:22,310 And then you are going to go work on potentially looking 552 00:53:22,310 --> 00:53:25,850 into our internal mechanisms and how to reduce 553 00:53:25,850 --> 00:53:26,610 these rates. 554 00:53:26,730 --> 00:53:30,450 I guess what is our overall strategy on steps forward 555 00:53:30,450 --> 00:53:32,130 to kind of get this done? 556 00:53:34,460 --> 00:53:35,580 Did you manage it? 557 00:53:37,850 --> 00:53:38,290 Thank you. 558 00:53:38,330 --> 00:53:40,130 It's like you've heard my hand raised, but now. 559 00:53:40,630 --> 00:53:45,090 So it's got to play out across a variety of different discussions 560 00:53:45,090 --> 00:53:50,550 the council and different cities, strategies. So in the council's budget process, we're going 561 00:53:50,550 --> 00:53:55,090 to hear a lot more about the capital projects and the rates and the overall city budget. 562 00:53:56,490 --> 00:53:59,350 And we'll talk about some of those things. So some of the things we're looking at, for example, 563 00:53:59,490 --> 00:54:04,010 the council did give us permission to bring on traditional staffing to work, particularly with the 564 00:54:04,010 --> 00:54:15,070 casket water alliance, the regional wastewater discussions that are going on. Right now we've been 565 00:54:15,070 --> 00:54:18,270 discussions. The mayor has been very involved. These discussions. 566 00:54:18,770 --> 00:54:21,170 House member Arnold, a deputy mayor. 567 00:54:22,070 --> 00:54:26,470 Back to being involved. And obviously, Councilor Pascal is our representative on the 568 00:54:26,470 --> 00:54:30,030 Cascade water line. So I think we've been trying to press it in every level to 569 00:54:30,030 --> 00:54:33,610 House City of Kirk and Kirk right different analysis, different thinking to sort of 570 00:54:33,610 --> 00:54:36,870 challenge people's assumption and try to lower some of the costs. 571 00:54:38,710 --> 00:54:42,930 So we're going to be working to state level two. We've had an our work program last time 572 00:54:42,930 --> 00:54:46,230 anything that comes out of these summits or ideas is something that they want to be 573 00:54:46,230 --> 00:54:51,530 taking to the state level, you know, and so. Right now it's still a big 574 00:54:51,530 --> 00:54:55,490 question uphill because these are decades in the making a lot of these decisions 575 00:54:55,490 --> 00:54:59,990 I'll just pick up the original levels and it's hard to get out of the challenge. 576 00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:29,980 Senator thinking in the short term, as this all kind of struck upon us. But as one as Jenny outlined at the very beginning, we're really trying to change our thinking about our own rates, trying to make process agreements, like splitting our water into your rates out, you know, for decades we haven't done that. So that's an example, a big better, a different analysis of the rates, tracking our revenues more carefully, like carefully at our costs, carefully at our labor costs and other costs. So there's plenty of nowhere in the government. There weren't looking hard at this and trying to come up with creative ways to break the rates. 577 00:55:29,980 --> 00:55:33,380 down and to convince the region to help bring great staff as well. 578 00:55:34,080 --> 00:55:36,440 So, what's for next time on this slide? 579 00:55:36,980 --> 00:55:38,560 And I would just add, appreciate that. 580 00:55:38,600 --> 00:55:45,620 I hope the Mayor, Prim in your public issues committee, is another place too to advocate 581 00:55:45,620 --> 00:55:48,220 what we can do immediately on affordability. 582 00:55:49,000 --> 00:55:51,180 Councillor Arld, did I see your hand up? 583 00:55:52,870 --> 00:55:58,770 You did, but City Manager covered, we're also excited about the regional representation by 584 00:55:58,770 --> 00:56:07,670 Councillor Pascale at Cascade, myself, the solid waste working group and the Cascade 585 00:56:07,670 --> 00:56:09,070 of Repremment, sound cities. 586 00:56:10,170 --> 00:56:10,770 Thank you. 587 00:56:11,030 --> 00:56:11,710 Deputy Mayor. 588 00:56:13,840 --> 00:56:14,260 Good segue. 589 00:56:14,420 --> 00:56:19,500 All I was going to do is add, I'm thankful, or the appointment to the Association of 590 00:56:19,500 --> 00:56:21,920 Washington City's legislative priorities committee. 591 00:56:22,620 --> 00:56:29,900 There, I, on behalf of Kirkland, have been able to elevate this issue with all the members 592 00:56:29,900 --> 00:56:35,040 of the legislative party and community, and those are elected officials, Statewide. 593 00:56:35,620 --> 00:56:41,240 And so we've gotten a really good response from those other elected officials. 594 00:56:41,260 --> 00:56:45,740 So this is becoming a topic that's going to elevate the Statewide. 595 00:56:46,920 --> 00:56:47,980 Thank you. 596 00:56:47,980 --> 00:56:54,400 prone to do of your hand? Yeah one one more question. So the other thing is I think given just how many factors 597 00:56:54,400 --> 00:57:00,100 there are that are going to be contributing to this rate increase across the board for all of our utilities. 598 00:57:00,740 --> 00:57:08,420 I think what would be helpful also is like understanding kind of the timing of when each of these 599 00:57:08,420 --> 00:57:15,600 individual factors would take and would would become a factor. So that we're prioritizing like okay you know 600 00:57:15,600 --> 00:57:19,440 like the King County's going to implement this rate increase by next month. 601 00:57:19,840 --> 00:57:23,920 Okay, all of our efforts should go there and we should focus on that. 602 00:57:24,080 --> 00:57:28,980 So I just wanted to maybe understand, like, are we factoring in timing as well of like 603 00:57:28,980 --> 00:57:35,580 when these various components could be implemented and then kind of prioritizing accordingly? 604 00:57:39,420 --> 00:57:39,760 We are. 605 00:57:40,580 --> 00:57:46,680 I think the challenge is unfortunately many of them are coming at the same time, right? 606 00:57:46,680 --> 00:57:51,160 the reason we call it for the summit and the summit occurred is that it just kind of happens 607 00:57:51,160 --> 00:57:56,800 that all of them are hitting the same tipping point of majorating pieces. So I think part of 608 00:57:56,800 --> 00:58:01,240 the reason I asked for additional resources to be part of the discussions is we're having 609 00:58:01,240 --> 00:58:05,920 to engage everything all at once, you know, the salt waste discussions, the rich on water quality 610 00:58:05,920 --> 00:58:13,020 discussions, the casket water lines discussions at our own looking at our own work. But yes that is exactly 611 00:58:13,020 --> 00:58:17,280 what we like out in terms of like where we send counts more to testify on our drafts that 612 00:58:17,280 --> 00:58:21,280 we make or what staff goes while they monitor. We're really trying to make sure that we're 613 00:58:21,280 --> 00:58:29,420 hit the right things at the rate. Great point. Thank you. Anyone else? All right, Jenny 614 00:58:29,420 --> 00:58:36,260 Brooke Amanda. Thank you very much. And we'll see soon. Jenny is there something you want to have? 615 00:58:36,600 --> 00:58:42,140 I wanted to add a figure code to just the final slide just to wrap up. We'll be coming back to you 616 00:58:42,140 --> 00:58:47,380 September 15th with proposed rates that incorporate some of the lovers we talked about today, 617 00:58:48,580 --> 00:58:54,720 and then again on October 20th so that we can have our new rates be effective on December 1st 618 00:58:54,720 --> 00:59:00,320 for a water sewer and on January 1st for surface water and solid waste. So, thank you. 619 00:59:01,240 --> 00:59:06,200 Great, thank you. Perfect, thank you. Thank you, Brooke. 620 00:59:09,040 --> 00:59:13,800 We are now going to move on to our second-study session item, which is a perfect set 621 00:59:13,800 --> 00:59:19,360 way based on the conversation we just had, which is the Kirkland Cares low-income support 622 00:59:19,360 --> 00:59:20,560 program update. 623 00:59:20,720 --> 00:59:21,340 City Manager. 624 00:59:24,630 --> 00:59:25,310 Thank you, Madam Harris. 625 00:59:25,530 --> 00:59:28,870 This was always going to be a business idea, but we felt like it actually made sense to have 626 00:59:28,870 --> 00:59:30,150 it as part of the study session. 627 00:59:30,490 --> 00:59:33,810 It's really about the impact rate to come forward and come folks. 628 00:59:34,450 --> 00:59:38,090 But then also the impact of this program on the overall rates themselves, those two things 629 00:59:38,090 --> 00:59:42,610 late, you know, clearly on a pay close attention to both aspects of that. So I 630 00:59:42,610 --> 00:59:45,870 here to give you an update on what's been going on with our current affairs program 631 00:59:45,870 --> 00:59:48,710 and sort of next steps. We're going to start with Michael Olsen, our director of finance 632 00:59:48,710 --> 00:59:52,250 administration, because often it's going to introduce his team that's going to speak. 633 00:59:53,960 --> 00:59:56,680 Good evening, my dear Deputy Mayor and council members. 634 00:59:57,320 --> 00:59:59,960 Quinn is our program coordinator for 635 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:03,860 Over the Kirkland CARES-LOWING CUNCE, report program, and he will be making the presentation 636 01:00:03,860 --> 01:00:10,480 tonight. And team hands are our operations manager. We'll be available for questions as well as 637 01:00:10,480 --> 01:00:10,940 myself. 638 01:00:13,000 --> 01:00:13,520 Go ahead, question? 639 01:00:15,100 --> 01:00:18,600 All right, good evening, Madam Mayor and Council members. I'm Kling Levy. I'm the current program 640 01:00:18,600 --> 01:00:22,960 coordinator for the Kirkland CARES-LOWING CUNCE, report program. This presentation is an update 641 01:00:22,960 --> 01:00:27,560 comprising of about eight slides from the program. We'll cover the following, a brief timeline 642 01:00:27,560 --> 01:00:32,160 an overview of program activities and administration. Outcomes and growth of the program over the 643 01:00:32,160 --> 01:00:36,180 last two and a half years and potential expansion options staffhood identified for the new 644 01:00:36,180 --> 01:00:36,620 future. 645 01:00:40,680 --> 01:00:45,280 So to begin with a quick recap, City Council added $680,000 in one time funding to 646 01:00:45,280 --> 01:00:50,620 the 2023-2024 biennial budget for the city's first universal utility relief program, 647 01:00:51,080 --> 01:00:55,060 expanding what was at the time the senior discount program to include discounts and rebates 648 01:00:55,060 --> 01:01:00,620 and expand coverage to all qualified low-income residents. The program was designed with 649 01:01:00,620 --> 01:01:04,940 erection and feedback from council throughout 2023 and established by ordinance that December 650 01:01:04,940 --> 01:01:11,500 and went into effect on January 1st, 2024. Of the original $680,000 budget funding, 651 01:01:11,840 --> 01:01:17,380 roughly $200,000 remains and the language of ordinance 04868 still defines the program 652 01:01:17,380 --> 01:01:22,360 administration and the benefits derived. The program was originally managed by outside contractors, 653 01:01:22,760 --> 01:01:25,080 but it came internally managed to be getting in 2025. 654 01:01:27,910 --> 01:01:29,190 So a bit of background on program 655 01:01:29,190 --> 01:01:36,510 The requirements for eligibility into the program are curriculum residency and a household income below 80% of the area and media income. 656 01:01:37,170 --> 01:01:45,850 The area and media income is determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and then recalculated every April utilizing data from the Seattle Bellevue H.F.M.A. 657 01:01:45,850 --> 01:01:47,830 which comprises King's and Homish Counties. 658 01:01:48,610 --> 01:01:58,330 For 2026, that means the threshold for qualification into the curriculum care's program would be a gross income of 93,350 dollars for a household comprising of two people. 659 01:01:58,330 --> 01:02:04,950 It goes up and down depending on the members of the household, so we recalculate just based on the amount of individuals within a household. 660 01:02:05,970 --> 01:02:12,450 Discounts are applied directly to city of Kirkland utility accounts for water, sewer and garbage services, into the city bills directly. 661 01:02:13,090 --> 01:02:21,470 This count of accounts receive a 50% discount on base water rates, a 25% discount on base sewer rates, and a 40% discount on base garbage rates. 662 01:02:21,470 --> 01:02:30,470 These discounts do not apply to consumption charges above the base rate and they do not apply to extra charges for extra pickups, late fees or shut-off fees. 663 01:02:32,030 --> 01:02:45,050 The creation of the Kirkland Care program also expanded coverage to households and multi-family units that are not directly built by the city via these discounts are realized through rebates that the city calculates and then sends to those households. 664 01:02:46,310 --> 01:02:52,170 For the more we extend rebates to cover Kirkland related fees for businesses, pets and vehicle registrations. 665 01:02:54,780 --> 01:03:00,440 As I said, these rebates are received through direct check to the service address of a customer, or via in-person pickup. 666 01:03:01,060 --> 01:03:09,280 Rebates for utilities are sent on a buy monthly basis, and one-time rebates for a qualified businesses, pets, and vehicle registrations are released on a monthly basis. 667 01:03:10,100 --> 01:03:14,200 eligibility is determined one time at the point of application, and then I buy any 668 01:03:14,200 --> 01:03:19,180 basis going forward. So this year in 2026, we are re-certifying all of the 669 01:03:19,180 --> 01:03:23,260 accounts that were certified in 2024. Re-certifying them. 670 01:03:28,430 --> 01:03:29,110 So we'll review the 671 01:03:29,110 --> 01:03:32,050 administration of the program along with budget and potential participation 672 01:03:32,050 --> 01:03:36,110 growth. As I mentioned earlier, the contract with the, with our, it's a 673 01:03:36,110 --> 01:03:40,750 contract or forward. It was not renewed in 2025. So residents now applied directly 674 01:03:40,750 --> 01:03:46,210 electronically or via paper application to the city to the city directly. Excuse me, Kurt. 675 01:03:48,070 --> 01:03:52,950 Yeah, I just want to do a bit there on that that the forward so we put out an RFP for some 676 01:03:52,950 --> 01:03:58,370 provided administration on the private sector. For it was the only one I chose to reply and after 677 01:03:58,370 --> 01:04:02,110 they did it for about a year and they decided it was too hard and they withdrew. So the reason that we 678 01:04:02,110 --> 01:04:06,030 ended up having to bring in houses we actually didn't have anyone else to do it and then when we 679 01:04:06,030 --> 01:04:12,090 each out. Kelsman from Conan asks me, have we tried to check in with some folks and do this 680 01:04:12,090 --> 01:04:17,790 on other places? And we found fur folks like Hope Lake, they were actually proposing to do it 681 01:04:17,790 --> 01:04:21,770 for more than we could do it in house. So part of the reason we resulted, but the temporary 682 01:04:21,770 --> 01:04:26,310 program coordinator was we found it to be the least expensive way we could do it at least at that time. 683 01:04:29,250 --> 01:04:34,910 Thank you for the clarification, Craig. So as Craig mentioned, the city has hired a temporary 684 01:04:34,910 --> 01:04:39,350 program coordinated to assist in administrating the program through 1226 that's me speaking 685 01:04:39,350 --> 01:04:43,990 to you now and the city continues to accept applications provide support and process recurring 686 01:04:43,990 --> 01:04:50,590 payments to all applicants to the program. This includes all re-certification, all payment 687 01:04:50,590 --> 01:04:54,730 processing, all eligibility screening and all outreach the program at this time. 688 01:04:57,940 --> 01:04:58,440 So a brief 689 01:04:58,440 --> 01:04:59,980 program summary over the last two minutes. 690 01:05:00,000 --> 01:05:06,840 The program has expanded coverage of the discount and rebate programs to over 1,000 total households over those two years. 691 01:05:07,580 --> 01:05:12,960 792 households now qualify for direct discounts on utility rates and across those households, 692 01:05:14,440 --> 01:05:20,220 $641,552 for discounted from utility charges between 2024 and the end of June, 2021. 693 01:05:21,720 --> 01:05:27,580 These discounts do not impact the program budget because they are realized the lack of revenue from utility charges, 694 01:05:27,580 --> 01:05:30,020 rather than rebated from the program budget directly. 695 01:05:31,280 --> 01:05:33,280 The average discount per household is somewhat 696 01:05:33,280 --> 01:05:35,500 bifurcated based on the services 697 01:05:35,500 --> 01:05:37,480 a household can receive. 698 01:05:37,940 --> 01:05:39,460 So for instance, a household is in a 699 01:05:39,460 --> 01:05:40,820 Norstery utility district or wouldn't 700 01:05:40,820 --> 01:05:42,300 be a water district service area 701 01:05:42,300 --> 01:05:43,960 and receiving water and sewer services 702 01:05:43,960 --> 01:05:45,360 from those utility providers. 703 01:05:45,620 --> 01:05:46,940 They qualify for less discounts 704 01:05:46,940 --> 01:05:48,800 because they are provided less services 705 01:05:48,800 --> 01:05:49,900 from the city of Kirkland. 706 01:05:50,740 --> 01:05:52,280 That being said, a water discount 707 01:05:52,280 --> 01:05:56,120 for single family residents is about $25 and $74 per 708 01:05:56,120 --> 01:05:56,880 billing cycle. 709 01:05:56,880 --> 01:06:03,880 For a sewer discount, it's $41.38, and the most common type of garbage service, a weekly 35 gallon pickup, is $42. 710 01:06:04,240 --> 01:06:07,460 And it's six cents per billing cycle, so that's two months. 711 01:06:08,380 --> 01:06:14,960 A garbage only account with the most common type of garbage pickup will receive $250 and $36 in discount annualized. 712 01:06:15,460 --> 01:06:19,900 While a single family residence, receding a water and sewer and garbage service from the city, 713 01:06:20,040 --> 01:06:24,160 will receive $655.8 in total discounts on an annual basis. 714 01:06:25,660 --> 01:06:33,540 Over that same time period, 229 total households qualify for buy monthly utility rebate checks. 715 01:06:34,320 --> 01:06:39,740 Recurring utility rebates are calculated by CECode and based on the bedroom size of the unit and the utility service provided. 716 01:06:40,280 --> 01:06:47,020 Recurring utility rebate for a garbage only account will result in $120 in total rebate on an annualized basis. 717 01:06:47,680 --> 01:06:54,940 While a one bedroom apartment receiving water, sewer and garbage services from the city of Kirkland will receive on average $360 in annual utility rebate. 718 01:06:56,300 --> 01:07:00,720 And then we also, as I mentioned earlier, provide business pet and vehicle licensing rebates. 719 01:07:01,420 --> 01:07:08,040 These rebates are applied after initial payment by the customer, and then a receipt is provided to the city to let us know that the payment was made. 720 01:07:09,380 --> 01:07:17,440 However, I will note that on business and pet licenses, the city also provides discounts to certain customers up front unrelated to the curriculum care program. 721 01:07:18,220 --> 01:07:23,440 So we see less utilization of business life rebates and pet license rebates for those reasons. 722 01:07:26,450 --> 01:07:31,130 So here we can see just a graph of overall program growth, as I mentioned earlier, that 723 01:07:31,130 --> 01:07:36,130 program is expanded, each year's registration from the original 277 senior discount accounts 724 01:07:36,130 --> 01:07:45,310 in 2023, adding 396 total accounts in 2024, 199 total accounts in 2025, and 149 accounts 725 01:07:45,310 --> 01:07:47,110 in the first half of 2026. 726 01:07:47,750 --> 01:07:52,530 These totals reflect the total of new applications, less the accounts that are removed from 727 01:07:52,530 --> 01:07:56,930 the program due to failure to re-certify or for informing us of a household change that impacts 728 01:07:56,930 --> 01:08:00,530 their eligibility for the program, such as the move outside of Kirkland, or change in 729 01:08:00,530 --> 01:08:01,050 the eligibility. 730 01:08:02,050 --> 01:08:06,030 The majority of the count growth has been driven by residents and single family residences, 731 01:08:06,210 --> 01:08:10,090 although 20% of the program totals are multi-family residences such as apartment complexes. 732 01:08:11,170 --> 01:08:15,670 And then I've raked down of those 792 accounts that are receiving direct utility discounts, 733 01:08:16,430 --> 01:08:22,350 792 of those are garbage accounts, 444 also receive water services, and 379 of them 734 01:08:22,350 --> 01:08:24,390 receive sewer services from the city. 735 01:08:29,190 --> 01:08:32,170 So the outreach that we've conducted over the past year and a half, we've used several 736 01:08:32,170 --> 01:08:36,010 different avenues to try and expand knowledge about the program locally and increase participation 737 01:08:36,010 --> 01:08:36,710 in the community. 738 01:08:37,070 --> 01:08:41,110 This includes distinct one-page mailers with a mailers, with program information that 739 01:08:41,110 --> 01:08:43,730 accompany rate-change letters to all utility account holders. 740 01:08:44,450 --> 01:08:47,950 We believe this is particularly effective at the beginning of this year at increasing program 741 01:08:47,950 --> 01:08:51,770 participation and intended to repeat the effort with future rate-change letters. 742 01:08:52,370 --> 01:08:55,970 We've also included blurbs in the Kirklander newsletter and staff has appeared on this week 743 01:08:55,970 --> 01:09:01,390 curriculum podcasts. So our thanks and shout-outs to the communications team and CML for allowing us to do that. 744 01:09:02,230 --> 01:09:06,190 Staff has also done direct outreach via site visits and multi-family facilities and apartment 745 01:09:06,190 --> 01:09:10,730 complexes in order to directly assist residents with applications and questions which show 746 01:09:10,730 --> 01:09:16,350 much of the rebate account growth that we saw in 2025. Finally, staff has met with various local 747 01:09:16,350 --> 01:09:20,290 organizations to determine if there are potentials for expansion or collaboration between our 748 01:09:20,290 --> 01:09:25,030 programs. That includes King County Housing Authority, original coalition for housing, 749 01:09:25,030 --> 01:09:27,290 in more sure utility districts, future sound energy, 750 01:09:27,770 --> 01:09:28,710 and wouldn't build water district. 751 01:09:33,710 --> 01:09:34,750 So this is the final slide, 752 01:09:34,850 --> 01:09:37,410 and this will discuss our continued efforts 753 01:09:37,410 --> 01:09:39,170 to look at other ways to expand the program, 754 01:09:39,330 --> 01:09:40,450 both with encouragement itself 755 01:09:40,450 --> 01:09:42,610 and potentially involving other utility districts. 756 01:09:43,790 --> 01:09:45,930 So the first option that we have 757 01:09:45,930 --> 01:09:47,970 and one that we intend on pursuing most readily 758 01:09:47,970 --> 01:09:49,570 is using data that was correlated 759 01:09:49,570 --> 01:09:51,370 between the public work service water scheme 760 01:09:51,370 --> 01:09:53,790 and the King County assessors property tax information. 761 01:09:54,810 --> 01:09:57,230 Using that, we identified 500 households 762 01:09:57,230 --> 01:09:59,970 that would qualify for the direct utility discount that do not. 763 01:10:00,000 --> 01:10:08,120 Currently, have not enrolled in the program. And in an additional 200 households that would qualify for BIMA for utility rebates that have not qualified for the program. 764 01:10:08,860 --> 01:10:23,220 This opportunity is a little unique in that we're utilizing the assessors determination for property tax exemptions in 2024 and 2025, which was a period that the property tax exemption increased by $30,000 to $84,000 total. 765 01:10:23,220 --> 01:10:29,020 and became greater than a Kirkland care program's lowest income qualification level of 80 $1,700. 766 01:10:29,800 --> 01:10:39,040 So that means that for 2,025, the 800 or the 700 households we've identified are more or less guaranteed to qualify for the King Count or the Kirkland cares program. 767 01:10:39,800 --> 01:10:44,470 Because the assessor's eligibility criteria is more stringent than our program's is. 768 01:10:45,320 --> 01:10:50,100 So staff is really working through options to onboard the 700 households most efficiently. 769 01:10:51,400 --> 01:10:58,080 The second option that we have is a potential expansion into the North Shore utility district 770 01:10:58,080 --> 01:10:59,120 service area. 771 01:11:01,240 --> 01:11:05,040 Right now, Kirkland Harris program only provides discounts and rebates to Kirkland provided 772 01:11:05,040 --> 01:11:06,540 garbage services in the area. 773 01:11:07,060 --> 01:11:10,660 But city code could be amended to allow for payments to North Shore utility district customers 774 01:11:10,660 --> 01:11:16,000 for the difference between the amounts that North Shore customers pay and receive in discount 775 01:11:16,000 --> 01:11:20,920 and the amount that Oakland Care's customers would receive in discount because of the difference 776 01:11:20,920 --> 01:11:24,260 in utility pricing between our areas, the difference in discount amounts and the difference 777 01:11:24,260 --> 01:11:28,800 in program eligibility requirements, this requires review on a case by case basis for each 778 01:11:28,800 --> 01:11:31,940 nor surely utility district customer determine whether or not they're already receiving 779 01:11:31,940 --> 01:11:37,200 nor short discounts and what the difference between that nor short discount and our discount is. 780 01:11:38,180 --> 01:11:41,040 We've included that as an attachment to our memo to council fair. 781 01:11:42,600 --> 01:11:48,500 We'd also potentially require a data sharing agreement between us and Norse or utility districts that we would know 782 01:11:48,500 --> 01:11:51,800 the customer list of everybody they have was on discounts. 783 01:11:52,620 --> 01:11:55,400 We've also discussed the possibility of a shared application portal, 784 01:11:55,540 --> 01:11:58,880 so that anybody that applies to Norse or would automatically apply for the curriculum and care program. 785 01:11:59,260 --> 01:12:02,480 We have not gone down that avenue just yet. 786 01:12:03,320 --> 01:12:07,520 Thirdly, we intend to re-examine the utility rebate calculations in the coming years. 787 01:12:07,520 --> 01:12:13,340 This is because the direct utility discounts that we give to Kirkland customers are based on percentages, 788 01:12:13,640 --> 01:12:17,020 and that's automatically update whenever a new utility rate is adopted by the council. 789 01:12:17,700 --> 01:12:21,600 However, the amount of utility rebate per household is defined by city code specifically, 790 01:12:22,220 --> 01:12:25,140 and so that was last determined when the ordinance was voted on in 2024. 791 01:12:26,040 --> 01:12:31,560 As utility costs increase year to year, these rebates will begin to lag the discount amount that we intend, 792 01:12:31,980 --> 01:12:33,680 and so only to be re-examined and re-determined. 793 01:12:34,740 --> 01:12:39,160 Finally, staff will continue to conduct outreach and process payments and applications throughout 794 01:12:39,160 --> 01:12:45,140 2020, six while working on potential administration options for 2027 and 2028. 795 01:12:48,230 --> 01:12:51,890 And finally, I'd like to leave it open for any questions in discussion you might have. 796 01:12:52,550 --> 01:12:53,130 Thank you, Quinn. 797 01:12:53,430 --> 01:12:58,670 I'm really proud of this program, and I'm very impressed with the outreach and all the 798 01:12:58,670 --> 01:13:00,670 work that you've done to expand this program. 799 01:13:01,010 --> 01:13:03,010 There's obviously a clear need. 800 01:13:03,010 --> 01:13:13,390 Council Member Felcon. Thank you, Madam Mayor. Well, thank you, Quinn. First of all, I know this is a lot of work to administer this program. I can imagine a lot of details, right? 801 01:13:13,590 --> 01:13:22,890 Going through and income verification and all of that is not an easy process. So thank you for that. I'm happy to hear that we're signing more people up. I think that's a good thing. 802 01:13:22,890 --> 01:13:28,650 even based on static meat, that's a good thing, right? But we know sadly that there's also 803 01:13:28,650 --> 01:13:33,250 growing meat, right, which is how this type, you know, nicely ties in to our former discussion, 804 01:13:33,810 --> 01:13:39,070 our last agenda item. And I really appreciate you, too, in the memo where you talked about being 805 01:13:39,070 --> 01:13:43,630 proactive in identifying other people who may qualify for the program as well. I know we're doing a 806 01:13:43,630 --> 01:13:49,850 lot of that already, but thinking of, you know, how else can we find folks who may be eligible for this 807 01:13:49,850 --> 01:13:55,290 program. I appreciate you mentioning the shared portal. I think that's a great idea. 808 01:13:56,170 --> 01:14:00,510 You know, I think it's important for us to fall to reduce our administrative costs, 809 01:14:00,810 --> 01:14:06,210 but also to reduce burden for applicants, right? We know that those that live with a low income 810 01:14:06,210 --> 01:14:11,630 have a lot of paperwork and a lot of phone calls and a lot of things, a lot of red tape 811 01:14:11,630 --> 01:14:16,710 to qualify for the programs that they so desperately need just to survive in our community. 812 01:14:16,710 --> 01:14:23,530 So I appreciate that the sheer portal could potentially address both of those things because obviously our administrative 813 01:14:24,270 --> 01:14:29,450 Administration cost here are pretty high proportion of the budget and anything we can do to reduce that 814 01:14:29,450 --> 01:14:34,790 I wonder if in the meantime I mean looking at like the folks who already qualified for not at like the 50% 815 01:14:34,790 --> 01:14:45,030 AMI do we have to you know it means test them if they've already qualified for that can we automatically accept them without having to go through our process to 816 01:14:45,030 --> 01:14:49,250 save again on burden on the administrative cost on us. 817 01:14:51,610 --> 01:14:55,730 So the short answer is yes based on city code anything that the director of finance deems 818 01:14:55,730 --> 01:14:59,970 acceptable for our purposes we could use so for instance we do are to use. 819 01:15:02,080 --> 01:15:14,160 We could also use nuts exempt exemptions in order to get these people on the program. The big is very to that right now, we'll just be getting a list from NUD, which requires something like a data sharing agreement. 820 01:15:14,840 --> 01:15:18,540 And they have mentioned there. They're willing to do so. We would just need to go through those legal barriers. 821 01:15:19,100 --> 01:15:23,420 Yeah, that would be great for us to do that, to be able to, as I said, say both the administrative 822 01:15:23,420 --> 01:15:25,720 cost and burden to them. 823 01:15:26,260 --> 01:15:26,860 So, thank you. 824 01:15:26,980 --> 01:15:31,060 I appreciate being proactive and I, and I, I love the idea of a shared portal, but I 825 01:15:31,060 --> 01:15:36,820 would love that for as many of these different jurisdictions and entities as we possibly could. 826 01:15:36,920 --> 01:15:40,260 Again, just to have more of an economy of scale savings there. 827 01:15:40,480 --> 01:15:41,660 So, thank you. 828 01:15:42,440 --> 01:15:42,840 Thank you. 829 01:15:42,900 --> 01:15:43,760 Can you answer your passcode? 830 01:15:45,220 --> 01:15:47,180 Yeah, thank you for that presentation. 831 01:15:47,180 --> 01:15:50,260 And then information that you shared, 832 01:15:51,300 --> 01:15:53,180 I'm going to kind of build off a little bit 833 01:15:53,180 --> 01:15:56,040 of what Councillor Favcone was talking about. 834 01:15:57,860 --> 01:16:00,880 And the one thing I guess that surprised me a little bit, 835 01:16:01,120 --> 01:16:03,660 wasn't, I mean, I wasn't surprised about the need 836 01:16:05,100 --> 01:16:08,020 and the fact that that's like they're going to increase 837 01:16:08,020 --> 01:16:12,180 with some of the utility costs that were forecasting. 838 01:16:14,080 --> 01:16:16,440 But I was a little surprised by the administrative costs. 839 01:16:17,180 --> 01:16:29,660 It looked like 357,000 between 2024 and 2026, which seemed to represent a pretty good chunk of the available funding. 840 01:16:30,500 --> 01:16:34,880 And so I know that you talked about reducing those administrative costs. 841 01:16:35,020 --> 01:16:47,160 I just want to emphasize that I think that'd be good, but I don't want to do it. 842 01:16:47,160 --> 01:16:54,780 those that participate in an efficient way, but my ask is just to track that over time to 843 01:16:54,780 --> 01:17:01,400 see how we are reducing costs, how effective we are being. So as long as we, so the point 844 01:17:01,400 --> 01:17:06,240 is that's just continuing tracking that and showing how we're making progress towards that would 845 01:17:06,240 --> 01:17:07,740 be helpful. Thank you. 846 01:17:11,090 --> 01:17:12,970 Did you major? Yeah. 847 01:17:15,310 --> 01:17:17,570 So I just thank you for those comments. I don't want 848 01:17:17,570 --> 01:17:21,630 that we also highlighted in the string of cost, but one of the things that is important to 849 01:17:21,630 --> 01:17:26,910 know is that the primary part of that cost is actually quit position, and he has done an 850 01:17:26,910 --> 01:17:31,790 extraordinary job, not just of reviewing eligibility and stuff, but also this all the work 851 01:17:31,790 --> 01:17:35,750 and everything, but he much talked about pretty much was also his work and trying to reach out to 852 01:17:35,750 --> 01:17:41,090 folks. So we did work really hard to try to find an alternative way to provide this service, 853 01:17:41,190 --> 01:17:45,170 and as I said, we didn't get any proposals and then when I reached out to folks, 854 01:17:45,170 --> 01:17:49,750 when the charges were. So when we asked everyone else, they're like, well, we did two or three people to do that. 855 01:17:50,430 --> 01:17:52,670 So we've very, very much about the administrative costs. 856 01:17:52,750 --> 01:17:54,690 We're going for creative ways to bring that down. 857 01:17:55,190 --> 01:17:57,730 But we haven't quite figured out that not yet. 858 01:17:57,910 --> 01:18:03,070 And then the final thing I'd say in terms of the overall cost, what is not really shown on that list is 859 01:18:03,070 --> 01:18:06,470 the foregone revenue that people get because they get the discount. 860 01:18:06,730 --> 01:18:10,590 So it's actually a better number than it looks because we basically, 861 01:18:11,690 --> 01:18:14,850 That's the one that came out of the plot you gave us, but it's not that this counts 862 01:18:14,850 --> 01:18:15,650 everybody's receiving. 863 01:18:16,510 --> 01:18:20,930 So, but so now did we definitely want to find a way to bring our numbers down, if we can. 864 01:18:23,230 --> 01:18:23,550 Thank you. 865 01:18:25,010 --> 01:18:25,810 Anyone else? 866 01:18:26,630 --> 01:18:28,930 Quinn, you are doing an excellent job on this. 867 01:18:28,970 --> 01:18:30,790 I really appreciate it. 868 01:18:31,070 --> 01:18:36,790 You may have said this in your presentation, but are there, oh, Calzareff, I'll call them. 869 01:18:37,010 --> 01:18:38,730 Sorry, I didn't see you, but I'll go ahead and finish. 870 01:18:39,510 --> 01:18:51,030 Are there other, are you getting requests from applicants for other types of relief, is there anything coming up that we're not capturing now? 871 01:18:53,600 --> 01:19:02,860 I would say the greatest amount of requests that we get there outside our current ability to do anything about is really just expanded discounts of what we already provide 872 01:19:04,060 --> 01:19:06,660 or misunderstandings about the current related nature of the fees. 873 01:19:07,480 --> 01:19:09,000 So, for instance, for the vehicle registration, 874 01:19:09,280 --> 01:19:10,760 we're only rebating that $20 fee 875 01:19:10,760 --> 01:19:13,720 that the city of Kirkland assesses on a car registration. 876 01:19:14,660 --> 01:19:17,120 Often when people hear about the program, they'll hear, 877 01:19:17,320 --> 01:19:19,180 you know, oh, I can get help with my vehicle registration 878 01:19:19,180 --> 01:19:20,880 and the cost is in the hundreds of dollars. 879 01:19:20,940 --> 01:19:22,400 The $20 fee, well, appreciated, 880 01:19:22,640 --> 01:19:25,140 is not what somebody imagines when they hear about that. 881 01:19:25,160 --> 01:19:28,140 For other city services, we don't hear as much. 882 01:19:28,140 --> 01:19:34,660 not hurt as much, but we have tried to increase our communication about exactly what we 883 01:19:34,660 --> 01:19:38,840 provide to try and limit those sort of situations going forward. 884 01:19:40,300 --> 01:19:41,620 Okay, thank you. 885 01:19:41,820 --> 01:19:42,760 Councillor Falkov. 886 01:19:43,320 --> 01:19:44,520 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 887 01:19:45,420 --> 01:19:50,800 Thank you for the explanation, Quinn, and also City Manager for your remarks about, you know, 888 01:19:50,840 --> 01:19:55,740 the cost driver being quit in position, right, which is really important, but I do think as 889 01:19:55,740 --> 01:19:59,880 as we talked about the need continuing to grow, not only like, and, you know, 890 01:20:00,000 --> 01:20:12,360 We're talking about just the overall cost per customer or per resident, right? That that dollar value will likely increase, but also the number of residents who qualify may also likely increase. 891 01:20:12,420 --> 01:20:28,880 So I see this as a, you know, how to make your position as efficient as possible, right? And so as we grow, even if the dollar amount remains the same, you know, plus, you know, annual, you know, pay increases that the percentage of a decrease because the total pie is going to be larger. 892 01:20:28,880 --> 01:20:33,180 to your percentage of the pipe that is the cost of your time would be slightly less like we 893 01:20:33,180 --> 01:20:37,440 already talked about some of the other things but also I love for us to look at instead of 894 01:20:37,440 --> 01:20:42,220 annually every two years doing means testing right I know that there's precedent for that 895 01:20:42,220 --> 01:20:48,060 and some other organizations that do means testing that may save you some time and also like to 896 01:20:48,060 --> 01:20:52,280 look at what other cities are doing to expand some sort of share portal right to see if this is 897 01:20:52,280 --> 01:20:57,940 something we can encourage in other cities which is be good for residents but also to help economy 898 01:20:57,940 --> 01:21:01,020 So, again, thank you so much. 899 01:21:02,100 --> 01:21:02,400 Thank you. 900 01:21:02,500 --> 01:21:04,360 Councillor Timchus, did I see your hand? 901 01:21:07,420 --> 01:21:07,680 All right. 902 01:21:07,860 --> 01:21:08,640 Anyone else? 903 01:21:11,230 --> 01:21:11,550 All right. 904 01:21:11,650 --> 01:21:13,690 Quinn, are you who is that a hit? 905 01:21:14,330 --> 01:21:14,910 That's all I've got. 906 01:21:15,110 --> 01:21:15,430 Thank you, Council. 907 01:21:16,330 --> 01:21:16,690 Awesome. 908 01:21:16,770 --> 01:21:17,770 Thanks so much. 909 01:21:19,880 --> 01:21:20,160 Okay. 910 01:21:20,600 --> 01:21:23,700 We are concluding our study session a few minutes early. 911 01:21:24,700 --> 01:21:27,880 So, we will be back at 7.30 for our regular meeting. 912 01:21:27,980 --> 01:21:28,660 Thanks, everybody. 913 01:21:29,600 --> 01:21:35,840 If breaks is needed to address any technical issues and help ensure that the meeting proceeds 914 01:21:35,840 --> 01:21:40,980 as smoothly as possible, I do see a number of people in the Rose Hill room. 915 01:21:41,080 --> 01:21:42,540 Thank you for joining us. 916 01:21:43,380 --> 01:21:49,280 We do not have any proclamations on our agenda, so we will start tonight's regular meeting 917 01:21:49,280 --> 01:21:50,720 with items from the audience. 918 01:21:53,540 --> 01:21:56,840 So, this is a time in our meeting when we normally hear from the public. 919 01:21:57,260 --> 01:21:59,220 Please limit your remarks to three minutes. 920 01:21:59,220 --> 01:22:05,240 we will provide up to a total of 45 minutes for our items from the audience with no more than six 921 01:22:05,240 --> 01:22:11,240 speakers on a subject regardless of their position on the subject. To address the council during 922 01:22:11,240 --> 01:22:17,080 this item through the audience, please sign up using the online public comment instruction link. 923 01:22:17,680 --> 01:22:24,420 Your first and last name displayed in Zoom must match the registration form. For those participating 924 01:22:24,420 --> 01:22:30,600 by phone please dial star nine to be recognized to speak. I am soon the audience is an important 925 01:22:30,600 --> 01:22:35,520 part of our business meeting. We ask that everyone be treated with kindness and respect. 926 01:22:36,140 --> 01:22:41,520 Please do not clap or applaud or otherwise openly express your agreement or disagreement with 927 01:22:41,520 --> 01:22:47,420 a speaker. When that happens even when supporting a speaker it can be disruptive of the meeting 928 01:22:47,420 --> 01:22:53,660 and discourage others who are sharing a different viewpoint. We discourage people for 929 01:22:53,660 --> 01:22:59,680 using obscenities and making personal attacks against others, and we ask that you direct your 930 01:22:59,680 --> 01:23:03,320 comments to Council, not to staff or audience members. 931 01:23:03,800 --> 01:23:09,040 In addition, because they can be disruptive, signs and placards are not allowed in Council 932 01:23:09,040 --> 01:23:14,280 Chambers, or the Rose Hill Room, during our meetings regardless of their content. 933 01:23:14,880 --> 01:23:20,960 As a reminder, state law does not allow items from the audience to be used for promoting, 934 01:23:20,960 --> 01:23:27,440 opposing or discussing a candidate's campaign or ballot proposition. 935 01:23:28,300 --> 01:23:32,020 Kirkland prides itself on being a respectful, welcoming community. 936 01:23:32,600 --> 01:23:38,240 We want everyone to feel like they belong in Council Chambers or the Rose Hill Room 937 01:23:38,240 --> 01:23:40,280 expressing their views points. 938 01:23:40,720 --> 01:23:42,680 City Clerk, could we have signed up to speak? 939 01:23:44,240 --> 01:23:45,020 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 940 01:23:45,180 --> 01:23:47,520 At this point, we do have 12 guests wishing to speak. 941 01:23:47,600 --> 01:23:49,720 We'll take the first three in this order. 942 01:23:49,720 --> 01:23:57,500 Christy jacket following us on site Jerry not on site and also Alicia Remira's on site. Please approach the podium 943 01:24:11,030 --> 01:24:20,510 Welcome Christy and you can see the timer on the screen on the screen. I do. Thank you. Go ahead. Hi, my name is Christy 944 01:24:20,510 --> 01:24:27,310 Dragots. My family lives at 6150 130th Avenue, Northeast, which is right against the Southern 945 01:24:27,310 --> 01:24:34,650 boundary of the south reservoir water tower site. I'm writing to ask for your help in finding a better 946 01:24:34,650 --> 01:24:40,690 outcome for a serious problem with the current project design. Our home is separated from the reservoir 947 01:24:40,690 --> 01:24:46,710 by a grove of mature, restaurant, red seeders. For generations this grove has screened our home 948 01:24:46,710 --> 01:24:53,030 from the tank and its barbed wire security fence. It has also sheltered wildlife, including my own 949 01:24:53,030 --> 01:24:55,090 children, climbing, and swinging in their branches. 950 01:24:55,950 --> 01:24:59,970 As currently designed, the project would remove all of the trees between... 951 01:25:00,000 --> 01:25:11,080 In our house in the water tower structure. It would also relocate the barbed wire fence right up to the property boundary, which is a mere 13 feet from our bedroom window. 952 01:25:12,760 --> 01:25:21,220 If the fence were moved on top of the boundary, it would leave us no ability to plant anything to screen our property from a barbed wire fence. 953 01:25:21,880 --> 01:25:26,940 And all of that aside, I actually want to talk about the trees that are slated for removal. 954 01:25:28,120 --> 01:25:34,980 The city's arborist report did not assess the western red cedar grove that sits between my house and the reservoir. 955 01:25:36,140 --> 01:25:41,380 Though this grove is on city's property, it can currently only be accessed from our property. 956 01:25:42,040 --> 01:25:49,880 And it's clear from the absence of sufficient analysis in the city's report that this grove was mostly ignored when the team reviewed the proposed water tower designs. 957 01:25:49,880 --> 01:25:57,000 We hired our own consulting arborist, which documented nine high retention value trees in the grove. 958 01:25:57,060 --> 01:26:04,180 Six of them are landmark trees, which are trees measuring larger than 26 inches in trunk diameter at breast height. 959 01:26:04,840 --> 01:26:07,280 The ones I'm talking about are quite larger than that. 960 01:26:07,620 --> 01:26:12,260 The diameter is as large as my arms spread out. These trees are gigantic. 961 01:26:14,820 --> 01:26:22,040 The three of the trees that are designated landmark trees are missing entirely from the city's inventory. 962 01:26:22,780 --> 01:26:30,620 So if our city staff have acknowledged the current report is deficient, but no commitment has been made to correct the design or mitigate the outcome. 963 01:26:31,020 --> 01:26:39,400 And as things stand, the city is relying on an erroneous report and we believe violating its own tree ordinance, which is chapter 95, if it proceeds. 964 01:26:39,400 --> 01:26:45,080 to be clear. We support the city maintaining its water infrastructure. What we're 965 01:26:45,080 --> 01:26:49,780 asking for is a design that preserves the grove and protects the buffer between 966 01:26:49,780 --> 01:26:54,760 our home and the facility. And I don't need to tell you I know that there's no 967 01:26:54,760 --> 01:27:00,360 replacing healthy 100 plus year old trees. Forest Health Specialists have noted 968 01:27:00,360 --> 01:27:05,500 significant Western Red Seater dieback in the Pacific Northwest since 2017 due 969 01:27:05,500 --> 01:27:09,620 climate change and hotter drier summers, which we're experiencing right now. 970 01:27:09,900 --> 01:27:13,340 As our arborist report lays out, young western red cedars. 971 01:27:13,380 --> 01:27:18,680 The kind the city keeps assuring us will be replanted, have very low survival rates. 972 01:27:19,140 --> 01:27:22,940 We also know that new trees simply planted next to each other does not constitute a 973 01:27:22,940 --> 01:27:25,160 grove nor mimic the benefits of one. 974 01:27:25,300 --> 01:27:29,560 Older western red cedars need to be redeemed because the new ones are dying. 975 01:27:29,760 --> 01:27:31,820 Christy, I apologize your time is up. 976 01:27:32,020 --> 01:27:32,320 That's okay. 977 01:27:32,640 --> 01:27:33,300 Thank you. 978 01:27:33,320 --> 01:27:35,100 Thank you for your passion on trees. 979 01:27:35,100 --> 01:27:41,120 And I know that Julie Underwood are public works director plans to come walk the site with you. 980 01:27:41,340 --> 01:27:45,420 So thank you. Yeah, I wouldn't invite anyone that wants to come out any time. Thank you so much. 981 01:27:47,240 --> 01:27:48,280 Jerry not. 982 01:27:51,100 --> 01:27:56,440 I'm Jerry not representing the Marinor condominiums next to Marina Park on Kirkland Avenue. 983 01:27:57,180 --> 01:28:06,640 I initially wanted to express our concerns about the excess noise created by loud boat music and large groups of people sitting on the dock late at night after 10 o'clock. 984 01:28:07,380 --> 01:28:13,680 The same three or four bolts tie up at the entrance end of the dock, which is directly below the western units of the mariner. 985 01:28:15,460 --> 01:28:16,000 Come on, baby. 986 01:28:17,100 --> 01:28:24,860 The police enforce the standard residential noise rules in Kirkland, but you have to call the non-emergency number to register a complaint with the Kirkland police. 987 01:28:25,680 --> 01:28:32,220 We call this number many times during the summer, and the police usually respond within 30 minutes to shut down the loud music and parties on the dock. 988 01:28:32,220 --> 01:28:37,000 The same bolts will return the next day, and the noisy parties will start it up again. 989 01:28:38,040 --> 01:28:42,620 We would suggest a regular 10pm walkthrough by police to shut down the loud music and 990 01:28:42,620 --> 01:28:45,020 disperse the crowds at the park side of the dock. 991 01:28:46,180 --> 01:28:51,720 The park rangers walk through the dock to the three times to check a day to check that 992 01:28:51,720 --> 01:28:54,500 if the bolts are paying their mortgage fees for that day. 993 01:28:54,500 --> 01:29:02,480 They leave by 6 or 7 at night after they tag checks and give tickets where needed. 994 01:29:02,960 --> 01:29:08,140 No one with the authorities around to maintain or enforce the dock rules that clearly 995 01:29:08,140 --> 01:29:13,460 state where you can more your boat, where you pay, no excessive noise allowed, no drinking 996 01:29:13,460 --> 01:29:18,000 on the dock, and no rafting alongside other boats on the south side of the dock. 997 01:29:18,000 --> 01:29:24,880 These rules have been regulated, these rules have not been regulated in force since the 998 01:29:24,880 --> 01:29:30,160 Harbor Master position was eliminated during COVID, and there's no one on the dock with 999 01:29:30,160 --> 01:29:32,480 authority to end any rule-breaking activities. 1000 01:29:33,560 --> 01:29:37,900 A few alterations between mariner tenets and mild bold operators, and their guests have already 1001 01:29:37,900 --> 01:29:43,780 occurred this summer, which have involved fist fights, verbal threats, and police involvement 1002 01:29:43,780 --> 01:29:45,900 regarding the sputes. 1003 01:29:54,140 --> 01:29:59,980 Tonight, I would like to express the mariners, homeowners, request of their country. 1004 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:06,360 Concerns regarding the excess noise be considered when planning the new dock construction for next year. 1005 01:30:06,860 --> 01:30:10,880 This would include a clear understanding of the rules and method of enforcement for the upcoming years. 1006 01:30:11,360 --> 01:30:17,680 We are tax-paying curtain residents who do not want the new dock to become a playground for loud music and parting crowds. 1007 01:30:20,330 --> 01:30:25,790 Examples of this activity would be one either Bay where they had to have to enforce new rules 1008 01:30:25,790 --> 01:30:31,890 at the nearby home owners requested to end this type of offensive behavior. 1009 01:30:32,950 --> 01:30:36,370 And Andrew's Bay in the South Lake Washington where they are initially new rules to control 1010 01:30:36,370 --> 01:30:38,130 the noisy crowds during the summer. 1011 01:30:39,250 --> 01:30:43,130 The dock mortgage should be for borders looking to visit Kirkland, tour the shops, enjoy 1012 01:30:43,130 --> 01:30:47,890 the restaurants, and be able to stay on their boat and not be assaulted with loud music 1013 01:30:47,890 --> 01:30:52,090 and the notches and obnoxious behavior. Thank you. 1014 01:30:52,310 --> 01:30:54,690 Thank you, Jerry. Alicia. 1015 01:30:56,430 --> 01:31:00,290 Alicia Ramirez will be followed by Aaron Belmore and Brady Northstrom. 1016 01:31:00,910 --> 01:31:03,550 Thank you. Good evening, Council. 1017 01:31:03,650 --> 01:31:07,230 Thank you for letting me speak tonight. First off, I want to thank you for passing 1018 01:31:07,230 --> 01:31:10,110 resolution 5, 7, 2, 9 last year. 1019 01:31:10,470 --> 01:31:12,390 Really, it's a preparing the civilian community for 1020 01:31:12,390 --> 01:31:15,370 ICE activity. And for the progress towards the goals of the 1021 01:31:15,370 --> 01:31:20,630 solution that were shared during the last meeting. However, despite this project progress, 1022 01:31:20,850 --> 01:31:25,050 time is not on our side. During the last several weeks, there have been an alarming uptake 1023 01:31:25,050 --> 01:31:31,330 in ice abductions of community members in Saurline, Seattle, Renton, Burian, the quillarevin, 1024 01:31:31,390 --> 01:31:37,490 Linwood, and Everett just to name a few. Yesterday and Lake Forest Park, a community member was 1025 01:31:37,490 --> 01:31:45,350 violently pulled out their vehicle and taken by ice and broad daylight in the middle of the 1026 01:31:45,350 --> 01:31:48,130 all over the region almost every day. 1027 01:31:48,710 --> 01:31:50,930 I urge you to move quickly to implement the rest 1028 01:31:50,930 --> 01:31:54,990 of resolution 5, 7, 2, 9, and to provide more resources 1029 01:31:54,990 --> 01:31:57,290 to residents regarding immigration rights 1030 01:31:57,290 --> 01:31:59,830 and assistance for impact community members 1031 01:31:59,830 --> 01:32:03,230 who have lost the breadwinner, breadwinner, or family member 1032 01:32:03,230 --> 01:32:03,910 to ICE. 1033 01:32:04,550 --> 01:32:05,790 Thank you. 1034 01:32:06,030 --> 01:32:06,990 Thank you. 1035 01:32:08,110 --> 01:32:08,530 Aaron. 1036 01:32:15,280 --> 01:32:16,680 Here today, not to talk anybody. 1037 01:32:16,880 --> 01:32:17,980 Just trying to get some resolution. 1038 01:32:18,660 --> 01:32:20,640 Everything's based on my opinion, simply 1039 01:32:20,640 --> 01:32:23,260 because City of Kirkman will not answer any questions 1040 01:32:23,260 --> 01:32:24,900 and or give any help. 1041 01:32:25,700 --> 01:32:26,980 Just kind of roll through stuff quick. 1042 01:32:27,100 --> 01:32:27,900 We'll have three minutes. 1043 01:32:28,020 --> 01:32:31,300 This is the original construction of one particular deck. 1044 01:32:31,420 --> 01:32:33,020 You can see some support that was done 1045 01:32:33,020 --> 01:32:35,060 with constant concrete center blocks. 1046 01:32:35,380 --> 01:32:37,340 No engineering done, Jeff let us know 1047 01:32:37,340 --> 01:32:39,440 that engineering at City of Kirkman is required. 1048 01:32:39,440 --> 01:32:41,280 You also let us know that permits required. 1049 01:32:41,600 --> 01:32:43,460 I reported it, City of Kirkman did nothing. 1050 01:32:43,940 --> 01:32:46,180 This is what happens when nothing's done. 1051 01:32:48,340 --> 01:32:50,740 Read on again, second time, no permits. 1052 01:32:50,740 --> 01:32:56,540 city city is not done anything. Then Adam from planning comes out. I didn't see any construction 1053 01:32:56,540 --> 01:33:00,780 any of it in construction. Well, they're plywood. They're still the center of blocks. I mean, 1054 01:33:01,180 --> 01:33:07,340 I don't know if that's got its leading our planning. We're in big trouble, by the way. It was told 1055 01:33:07,340 --> 01:33:13,220 that not contact the fire department for that. And I've been on it that our civil servants are using 1056 01:33:13,220 --> 01:33:18,000 those decks. I don't know if their families or friends know that they're in danger, possibly every day. 1057 01:33:18,920 --> 01:33:25,800 Here's one catch basin that was replaced tied into a large catch basin that goes onto our under a fire lane right here 1058 01:33:25,800 --> 01:33:33,180 Possible sink holes. We have water mains that were replaced possible sink holes firefighters, police cruisers, other citizens 1059 01:33:33,180 --> 01:33:39,980 Mayor may not know about what it can be possibly done. Here's a packet that was given you were at the meeting may first 1060 01:33:39,980 --> 01:33:42,920 Why you guys refuse to answer questions is beyond me? 1061 01:33:43,120 --> 01:33:47,380 This is what you're elected officials. You're here to answer questions. You hear the do stuff for the people 1062 01:33:47,380 --> 01:33:51,600 here's David's promise in an email that I'm going to get answers by May 13th still 1063 01:33:51,600 --> 01:33:58,140 knows it. No answers right there, boom. Constant delays. He said he had a meeting 1064 01:33:58,140 --> 01:34:01,940 with experts. Experts were going to be able to get me the answers after the May 13th meeting. 1065 01:34:02,100 --> 01:34:07,320 No answers. After my meeting, after our council meeting, the other day I said that I was not able 1066 01:34:07,320 --> 01:34:14,560 to contact council and or fire based on David's emails. Here's his retaliation email that 1067 01:34:14,560 --> 01:34:19,580 States. Oh, you can contact them. I never said that. And all Aaron refuses to meet in person. 1068 01:34:19,840 --> 01:34:25,980 But Aaron doesn't have more emails on that. And then here we have in David's emails right here, 1069 01:34:26,100 --> 01:34:33,560 where he says, don't contact, don't contact fire or counsel. Um, so blame game. We're not going to 1070 01:34:33,560 --> 01:34:38,400 enter into the blame game with David. Are my attorneys said that David keeps doing it. Adam's keeps 1071 01:34:38,400 --> 01:34:43,600 doing it. David keeps a David takes snippets of emails and tries to change the outcome of it by by by by 1072 01:34:43,600 --> 01:34:47,520 what are you stating? You know, Mayor, you're really good at public speaking. You're 1073 01:34:47,520 --> 01:34:52,120 follow through really, really awful. You know, you say Kirkland's all inclusive. You 1074 01:34:52,120 --> 01:34:56,740 say all this stuff, but there's no action. So I emailed the City Council. I hope all 1075 01:34:56,740 --> 01:34:59,960 you guys reply. I don't want to have another possible violation for 1076 01:35:15,620 --> 01:35:17,100 Thank you. 1077 01:35:24,120 --> 01:35:31,080 All right. Next we have Brady Norstrom. And Brady's joining us virtually. All right. 1078 01:35:37,690 --> 01:35:39,290 radio you there? 1079 01:35:46,490 --> 01:35:49,210 It might take just one moment. Okay. 1080 01:35:51,480 --> 01:35:53,980 Hey there folks, I believe 1081 01:35:53,980 --> 01:35:59,040 you can hear me now, so I'll go for it. Hi, my name is Brady Northstrom, and I am the 1082 01:35:59,040 --> 01:36:02,900 associate director of government relations and policy at the Housing Development 1083 01:36:02,900 --> 01:36:07,020 Consortium. I'm also here to represent the voices of the East Side Affordable 1084 01:36:07,020 --> 01:36:11,500 Housing Coalition, which consists of about 30 organizations that build, 1085 01:36:11,500 --> 01:36:16,500 operate and advocate for affordable housing on the east side, including in Kirkland. 1086 01:36:17,260 --> 01:36:21,300 I first wanted to thank staff for their hard work and early engagement around the housing 1087 01:36:21,300 --> 01:36:26,740 on faith owned land code amendment that's on the agenda today. 1088 01:36:27,180 --> 01:36:31,660 We support the initial proposal from staff and the proactive engagement that was done with 1089 01:36:31,660 --> 01:36:35,500 the affordable housing community, including our coalition members. 1090 01:36:35,500 --> 01:36:42,740 This policy is a win-win for faith communities and the city of Kirkland, faith organizations 1091 01:36:42,740 --> 01:36:47,760 can use their land to prove their financial standing, while contributing to mission-aligned 1092 01:36:47,760 --> 01:36:54,540 community goals. It's also a good chance for the city to expand affordable housing. However, 1093 01:36:54,620 --> 01:37:00,300 this policy is only worthwhile if it can be used by these faith communities. So we just wanted 1094 01:37:00,300 --> 01:37:04,200 to take staff for setting a solid foundation for this success. 1095 01:37:05,020 --> 01:37:08,100 Some of the things without going into all the details, 1096 01:37:09,140 --> 01:37:11,820 but flexible and clear design and development standards, 1097 01:37:12,800 --> 01:37:14,820 increase capacity and exchange for affordability 1098 01:37:14,820 --> 01:37:18,120 with the chance to get the deeper levels through extra bonuses, 1099 01:37:18,880 --> 01:37:22,080 and then the buy right approval and administrative review 1100 01:37:22,080 --> 01:37:23,600 for departure requests. 1101 01:37:24,100 --> 01:37:26,460 Something that is pretty common in development 1102 01:37:26,460 --> 01:37:29,460 is that almost every project requires a departure. 1103 01:37:29,460 --> 01:37:35,480 So we wanted to take staff for including administration departures for these minor deviations. 1104 01:37:35,960 --> 01:37:41,920 We would also ask for more substantial code deviation requests to have a pathway as well. 1105 01:37:43,460 --> 01:37:45,260 So faith communities are not development experts. 1106 01:37:46,260 --> 01:37:50,180 And so we support these additional parts of the code that's being recommended. 1107 01:37:50,380 --> 01:37:55,780 One of the things to go beyond the code rather including expedited permitting review, 1108 01:37:55,780 --> 01:38:01,440 pretty submittal conferences and staff support. Future work will also be needed to educate these 1109 01:38:01,440 --> 01:38:07,820 faith communities about what this tool is, how they can use it and what circumstances. It 1110 01:38:07,820 --> 01:38:14,720 ultimately takes knowledge, money, and time for a faith community to even consider development 1111 01:38:14,720 --> 01:38:21,740 and then go through a discernment process. So we look forward to this next stage as well. So thank 1112 01:38:21,740 --> 01:38:25,760 you for your time this evening and thank you for moving forward this important policy. 1113 01:38:25,780 --> 01:38:27,340 Thank you, Brady. 1114 01:38:29,610 --> 01:38:29,710 All right. 1115 01:38:29,710 --> 01:38:30,430 I have a city clerk. 1116 01:38:30,930 --> 01:38:33,130 Next, we have Alex Zimmerman, Lian, 1117 01:38:33,210 --> 01:38:36,330 Institute, and Lilith Winkler's short. 1118 01:38:37,450 --> 01:38:40,390 The first two on-site in the last virtual. 1119 01:38:41,610 --> 01:38:42,630 All right. Alex. 1120 01:38:43,310 --> 01:38:44,310 Yeah, thank you. 1121 01:38:44,530 --> 01:38:45,810 Now, my name is Alex Zimmerman. 1122 01:38:45,910 --> 01:38:47,530 I'm President of St. Dapan, America. 1123 01:38:47,650 --> 01:38:50,030 I want to speak about low-income problems. 1124 01:38:51,070 --> 01:38:52,790 So, it months ago, 1125 01:38:53,950 --> 01:38:55,830 what involved in country housing authority. 1126 01:38:55,830 --> 01:39:04,570 Eight months ago, I give my request a few questions to depot your mayor, Mr. Black, because 1127 01:39:04,570 --> 01:39:11,110 he commissioned her of King Country Housing Authority. So, situation very simple, right now, last 1128 01:39:11,110 --> 01:39:16,470 year I come three times to meeting King Country Housing Authority of certain meetings they give 1129 01:39:16,470 --> 01:39:24,330 me a response for ever. So, all rest of my life I cannot go. So, Mr. Black, this is the 1130 01:39:24,330 --> 01:39:29,790 What is mean why? Because I have little bit different opinion. Maybe very different opinion. 1131 01:39:30,030 --> 01:39:33,910 Because in country, how is a notoriety of this commissioner, Mr. Black, 1132 01:39:34,250 --> 01:39:39,490 deputy mayor, is a pure crook and bandita in killer, this a very serious problem. 1133 01:39:40,450 --> 01:39:45,910 They more dangerous than Hitler, Nazi Gestapo, fascist, you know what is mean? 1134 01:39:47,670 --> 01:39:53,150 We have a constitution, law, for 250 years. 1135 01:39:53,950 --> 01:39:57,750 Hitler don't have this, in freedom of speech, Hitler don't have this. 1136 01:39:58,030 --> 01:39:58,670 If we have... 1137 01:40:00,670 --> 01:40:17,030 Execute your order, you're ago, from Trump, you know what is mean, can country housing authority post to be blown out into American citizens, because I'm come for this three meeting, what is they have, and investigate into guys you spend $100 million for not legal immigrant. 1138 01:40:17,630 --> 01:40:29,430 And people like me senior citizens disabled, low income, you know what is mean, don't have chance, go to can country housing authority, you pay Tory percentage from income, like my income, for example. 1139 01:40:29,430 --> 01:40:33,470 I cannot afford to live. It's fine apartment, ever. 1140 01:40:37,350 --> 01:40:39,790 Well, better, you know, at least. 1141 01:40:40,550 --> 01:40:42,030 For 1,000 bucks a month. 1142 01:40:42,830 --> 01:40:45,850 So this guy very interesting because you know about this. 1143 01:40:45,950 --> 01:40:50,170 I speak about this and all kinds of know about this and no one else. 1144 01:40:50,670 --> 01:40:53,970 But this exactly what is you doing, because I told you more than 1145 01:40:53,970 --> 01:40:55,970 the original, I guess, that was the first. 1146 01:40:56,550 --> 01:40:59,510 This guy who spoke before me to talk about this exactly. 1147 01:40:59,510 --> 01:41:06,050 say because you democrat, you make from King country and from Kirkland, you know what is 1148 01:41:06,050 --> 01:41:06,850 mean? 1149 01:41:06,990 --> 01:41:11,010 Two and a half millionths left and Kirkland has this hundred millionths. 1150 01:41:11,650 --> 01:41:12,350 Very quiet. 1151 01:41:12,950 --> 01:41:17,130 Nobody is talking about this, you know what is mean, so you more danger is in Hitler, 1152 01:41:17,370 --> 01:41:18,110 not so good stuff. 1153 01:41:18,330 --> 01:41:18,910 Fascists. 1154 01:41:19,090 --> 01:41:24,790 Hitler is talking about German, for every German, you kill every American citizen. 1155 01:41:24,790 --> 01:41:31,450 is totally opposite. You are real bandit, you are real killer. When you stop in doing this, 1156 01:41:31,750 --> 01:41:34,590 while all in considers an American, don't have right. 1157 01:41:35,050 --> 01:41:39,330 We have a Trump, we have an American revolution, stand up, slap, and hit the cow. 1158 01:41:39,930 --> 01:41:42,410 We have executive order from President. 1159 01:41:43,430 --> 01:41:43,990 Idiot. 1160 01:41:44,910 --> 01:41:45,870 No, fine, dude. 1161 01:41:49,420 --> 01:41:51,900 All right, next we have Leigh Ann. 1162 01:41:57,930 --> 01:41:58,530 Did he clerk? 1163 01:42:01,020 --> 01:42:11,540 Mayer Curtis, we have a guest here that's announcing a very special scholarship and they're requesting that that guest be heard from first and that person is 1164 01:42:12,500 --> 01:42:16,260 Lilith and she is online. Can we accommodate that request please? 1165 01:42:17,520 --> 01:42:18,000 Absolutely. 1166 01:42:18,680 --> 01:42:19,220 Stand by. 1167 01:42:34,330 --> 01:42:45,630 Good evening, city council members and Mayor Curtis. My name is Lilith Winkler Shore. I served on the 1168 01:42:45,630 --> 01:42:50,390 the eighth annual Matthew Dahl Kirkland Youth Council Memorial Scholarship Award. 1169 01:42:51,030 --> 01:42:56,850 Matt served on Kirkland Youth Council from 2009 to 2012. He passed away in February of 1170 01:42:56,850 --> 01:43:02,730 2018. Matt was proud of his service to his community and loved being a part of the council. 1171 01:43:03,370 --> 01:43:08,750 In his spirit and memory, his parents, Linda and Bob establishes annual scholarship to benefit 1172 01:43:08,750 --> 01:43:13,890 a Kirkland Youth Council high school senior. I'm here representing the scholarship review committee 1173 01:43:13,890 --> 01:43:18,570 which includes myself, and Allison Blair, and Kenny Drabble, who are there in chamber today. 1174 01:43:19,050 --> 01:43:22,910 The three of us have served on KYC together alongside our dear friend, Matt. 1175 01:43:23,970 --> 01:43:29,030 Especially exciting tonight, I'm here to introduce land institutes to the council and to the 1176 01:43:29,030 --> 01:43:35,070 community. As the 2006 recipient of the Matthew Doll Cartland Youth Council Memorial Scholarship Award, 1177 01:43:35,470 --> 01:43:39,330 land is here with us tonight and will make some remarks after this announcement. 1178 01:43:39,910 --> 01:43:44,690 Lann graduated from Winita High School this year, she will be attending the University of Washington. 1179 01:43:45,510 --> 01:43:51,570 Lann is to be commended for her extensive service and leadership to Kirkland on the youth council beginning in 2024. 1180 01:43:52,650 --> 01:44:04,350 We are incredibly touched by her responses to the essays and we would love to share one quote which we really think gives the heart and soul of what Kirkland youth council is about and particularly about what Lann services about. 1181 01:44:04,350 --> 01:44:09,910 She wrote, the most valuable skill I've taken away from KYC is the ability to build bridges 1182 01:44:09,910 --> 01:44:15,130 between people and create spaces where others feel genuinely seen, heard, and valued. 1183 01:44:15,710 --> 01:44:20,190 I realized how much belonging shapes the way people contribute, collaborate, and grow. 1184 01:44:20,750 --> 01:44:25,570 When I became co-chair, I began thinking about leadership, not as directing people, but 1185 01:44:25,570 --> 01:44:27,290 as intentionally creating connection. 1186 01:44:28,510 --> 01:44:29,570 Congratulations, Lian. 1187 01:44:30,170 --> 01:44:34,990 Kirkland Youth Council continues to provide an important formative opportunity for local youth. 1188 01:44:35,410 --> 01:44:36,750 We want to recognize ready Schubiger. 1189 01:44:36,850 --> 01:44:41,590 For the wonderful guidance, you continue to provide as the program coordinator for the Kirkland Youth Council. 1190 01:44:42,330 --> 01:44:45,070 And thank you for the opportunity to make this scholarship announcement. 1191 01:44:45,970 --> 01:44:48,990 And now I believe they end with like to use her public comment to say a few words. 1192 01:44:49,270 --> 01:44:51,090 Thank you all so much and congratulations again. 1193 01:44:51,770 --> 01:44:52,410 Thank you. 1194 01:45:00,820 --> 01:45:17,160 Good evening, Mayor Curtis, members of the City Council and everyone here tonight. First, I would really like to sincerely thank the DELF family and the scholarship committee for this incredible honor. I feel so genuinely honored. 1195 01:45:18,520 --> 01:45:25,960 It really means so much to receive a scholarship that celebrates Matthew Dahl's commitment to serving our community. 1196 01:45:26,560 --> 01:45:35,040 And I also want to thank the City of Kirkland for continuing to invest in young people through programs like the Kirkland Youth Council. 1197 01:45:35,980 --> 01:45:46,980 In the excerpt that was shared of my scholarship as I talked about building bridges between people and creating spaces where others feel seen. 1198 01:45:46,980 --> 01:45:54,740 heard and valued. That became truly my biggest takeaway from KYC, but it also changed the way 1199 01:45:54,740 --> 01:46:02,460 that I think about leadership. When I first joined KYC, I thought I was joining a group that 1200 01:46:02,460 --> 01:46:09,600 planned events and volunteered in the community while that is still true. I never expected it to 1201 01:46:09,600 --> 01:46:17,520 the kind of person that I wanted to become. It taught me that meaningful leadership isn't 1202 01:46:17,520 --> 01:46:22,720 about having the loudest voice in the room. It's about making sure that people feel comfortable 1203 01:46:22,720 --> 01:46:29,140 using theirs. And some of the moments I'm most proud of, uh, where it when I was the one speaking, 1204 01:46:29,580 --> 01:46:37,000 but when I saw someone who had once, uh, been quiet, began sharing their ideas because they finally 1205 01:46:37,000 --> 01:46:44,060 felt like they belonged. As someone who has moved between countries, cultures, and communities 1206 01:46:44,060 --> 01:46:52,460 many times, I know how meaningful that feeling of belonging can be. That's why creating spaces 1207 01:46:52,460 --> 01:46:57,940 where people feel welcomed, included, and valued is something I care so deeply about, and it's 1208 01:46:57,940 --> 01:47:03,120 something, and it's a lesson I'll carry with me long after my time on KYC. 1209 01:47:04,640 --> 01:47:17,540 Receiving a scholarship in Matthew Dahl's name is especially meaningful, because it reminds me that the bridges we build and the impacts we make can continue long after we're gone. 1210 01:47:17,820 --> 01:47:26,940 Every act of kindness, every opportunity we create for someone else, and every person we encourage has the potential to shape the community in ways we may never fully see. 1211 01:47:26,940 --> 01:47:33,200 and I hope to carry that listen with me a long after my time on KYC is over. 1212 01:47:34,120 --> 01:47:38,420 So thank you again to the Dahl family, this college of committee and the city of Krakhan for 1213 01:47:38,420 --> 01:47:43,960 this incredible honor. It is something that I will always be grateful for and I will carry with me 1214 01:47:43,960 --> 01:47:50,100 whatever life takes me next. Thank you. Thank you, and congratulations. I was going to say we 1215 01:47:50,100 --> 01:47:55,920 with clap, but you can't hear us. So thank you so much. All right, next we have Aaron. 1216 01:47:57,760 --> 01:48:03,620 Aaron Hamilton followed by Alicia Wees and Sean Hornbrook. Thank you. 1217 01:48:06,770 --> 01:48:13,430 Hello again. It's wonderful seeing all of your virtual faces. It's been a hot minute, but I always 1218 01:48:13,430 --> 01:48:18,650 like to make an effort to recognize people that go above and beyond, especially when it comes 1219 01:48:18,650 --> 01:48:26,390 to my community. Even though I'm a little bit late, Redmond keeps me busy, but I would 1220 01:48:26,390 --> 01:48:31,890 like to recognize Chief St. Jean and the Kirkland Police Department for doing just that 1221 01:48:31,890 --> 01:48:37,630 and inviting me to present my transgender community interaction and engagement for public 1222 01:48:37,630 --> 01:48:45,690 safety training course. It's a work in progress. Back in June, it's not something that 1223 01:48:45,690 --> 01:48:53,330 I needed to do or had to do, but after my quick and dirty pitch and a conversation, he was 1224 01:48:53,330 --> 01:48:53,810 on board. 1225 01:48:54,230 --> 01:48:56,490 He wanted to do it, signed up, let's go. 1226 01:48:58,210 --> 01:48:59,450 That truly means a lot. 1227 01:48:59,710 --> 01:49:05,170 It was a great training session, the officers in attendance, passed with flying colors, 1228 01:49:05,350 --> 01:49:13,570 a plus-schooled stars, they asked tremendous questions, and it gives me hope to see what 1229 01:49:13,570 --> 01:49:21,530 enforcement, taking these opportunities to learn about my community and what they can do 1230 01:49:21,530 --> 01:49:30,450 to help. I don't know if any of you remember, but the last time I was over there, giving the 1231 01:49:30,450 --> 01:49:38,210 speech on Transvisibility Day, I spoke a lot about Knowledge's Power and this is where it kind 1232 01:49:38,210 --> 01:49:42,670 of starts. This is a training program that I've been working on with public safety to help bridge 1233 01:49:42,670 --> 01:49:50,930 that gap and rebuild these bridges between law enforcement and my community and we're starting 1234 01:49:50,930 --> 01:49:58,310 and I'm actually starting to see progress, especially with interactions from law enforcement 1235 01:49:58,310 --> 01:49:59,370 with the community. 1236 01:50:00,000 --> 01:50:10,360 So, it's giving me hope that what I'm doing is good. I hope, and that we can continue to rebuild that trust. 1237 01:50:12,180 --> 01:50:24,780 I like to thank Mike very much, because, you know, with our conversations, you've always been, I just want to, I just want to do what I need to do to make you all happy. 1238 01:50:24,780 --> 01:50:39,780 And feel safe and important, and that really means a lot, so I just wanted to recognize those efforts and appreciate what the Kirkland PD is doing and hopefully we can take you all can take that to 1239 01:50:39,780 --> 01:50:52,820 We're all coming in September, so hopefully you're a little bit more prepared for dealing with the community from afar or however they want to be doing that, so thank you very much 1240 01:50:52,820 --> 01:50:58,820 Thank you, Erin. If we sincerely appreciate you showing your appreciation, so thank you very much. 1241 01:51:01,520 --> 01:51:03,200 Alicia's next, correct? 1242 01:51:04,460 --> 01:51:08,860 Correct. She is online, so we're waiting for her to go through the transition here. 1243 01:51:18,660 --> 01:51:22,240 Good evening, Mayor Curtis. The members of the council. My name is Alicia Chiruris. 1244 01:51:22,420 --> 01:51:25,300 And I'm here today on behalf of Habitat for Humanity. 1245 01:51:25,300 --> 01:51:33,180 Seattle King and Kinitask County's to speak in the support of the ordinance expanding affordable housing opportunities on faith owned property. 1246 01:51:33,920 --> 01:51:38,800 Habitat submission is simple. Everybody knows a decent affordable place to call home. 1247 01:51:39,300 --> 01:51:47,280 We work toward that mission to permanently affordable home ownership and partnerships that turn underused land into real housing opportunity. 1248 01:51:47,280 --> 01:51:50,320 This ordinance speaks directly to that work. 1249 01:51:51,000 --> 01:51:53,300 Faith opportunities across the east side, 1250 01:51:53,600 --> 01:51:56,720 often hold land that is incredibly valuable and underused. 1251 01:51:57,140 --> 01:51:59,440 These parcels represent one of the most promising 1252 01:51:59,440 --> 01:52:02,600 and most overlooked opportunities to build affordable homes 1253 01:52:02,960 --> 01:52:05,460 in places that already have community groups, 1254 01:52:05,780 --> 01:52:08,900 transit access and neighbors who want to see them thrive. 1255 01:52:09,580 --> 01:52:12,280 By allowing streamlined permitting and reasonable density 1256 01:52:12,280 --> 01:52:16,540 and high flexibility for residential development on faith owned land, 1257 01:52:16,540 --> 01:52:25,340 This ordinance removes real barriers, the kinds that often, the kind that often stall affordable projects for years, or kill them before they start. 1258 01:52:26,020 --> 01:52:35,700 It gives faith organizations a genuine path to put their land toward long-term community benefit, and it gives nonprofit developers like Habitat, a viable partner to build with. 1259 01:52:36,280 --> 01:52:45,780 We know this model works, and it's already helping families move from renting to owning in communities across our region, and we believe it can work in hurt going to. 1260 01:52:45,780 --> 01:52:50,880 Habitat is committed to deepening our presence on the east side. We want to work directly 1261 01:52:50,880 --> 01:52:57,160 with Perkland's faith communities, city staff, and this council to identify sites where 1262 01:52:57,160 --> 01:53:02,620 this ordinance can turn into real, permanently affordable homes for local families. We see 1263 01:53:02,620 --> 01:53:07,520 this legislation as an invitation and we intend to answer it. We urge you to pass this ordinance 1264 01:53:07,520 --> 01:53:13,040 and we look forward to building what comes next together. Thank you. Thank you, Alicia. 1265 01:53:13,040 --> 01:53:13,260 But 1266 01:53:19,820 --> 01:53:28,560 Sean Hornbrook virtually, after Sean, we have two additional guests, Ken McKenzie, on 1267 01:53:28,560 --> 01:53:30,200 site and Joe Conzler virtually. 1268 01:53:30,980 --> 01:53:31,660 Thank you. 1269 01:53:52,960 --> 01:53:54,080 Sean, do you hear us? 1270 01:54:08,410 --> 01:54:09,210 I've bought an out. 1271 01:54:09,270 --> 01:54:09,650 Can you hear me? 1272 01:54:10,210 --> 01:54:10,270 Okay. 1273 01:54:10,570 --> 01:54:11,010 We can. 1274 01:54:11,230 --> 01:54:11,470 Go ahead. 1275 01:54:12,270 --> 01:54:12,710 Great. 1276 01:54:12,830 --> 01:54:14,610 Thank you so much. 1277 01:54:14,950 --> 01:54:15,250 Good evening. 1278 01:54:16,350 --> 01:54:20,890 Ms. Mayer and to council, I'll be really brief here. 1279 01:54:20,890 --> 01:54:24,090 I only need my only comment. It has to do with the 1280 01:54:26,210 --> 01:54:31,690 Arita agreement and I wanted to just I'm sure the numbers of the council 1281 01:54:31,690 --> 01:54:35,690 and Madam Mayor familiar with what's what the agreement is about 1282 01:54:36,230 --> 01:54:41,190 One it's affordable housing which is great and I think we can all get behind that 1283 01:54:41,670 --> 01:54:45,730 But my concern with this new agreement is that in 2019 1284 01:54:47,770 --> 01:54:49,770 Arita benefited from the 1285 01:54:52,090 --> 01:54:58,170 the MFT pilot program. They already got an attack spin at received attack spin 1286 01:54:58,170 --> 01:54:59,690 a fit for this property. 1287 01:55:01,080 --> 01:55:08,360 So, what are we going to get? It was another tax break plus the no interest loan as members of the 1288 01:55:08,360 --> 01:55:15,180 Kirkland community. I've lived here for homeowner for 23 years now. Great place. That's your 1289 01:55:15,180 --> 01:55:20,760 refill. I just wanted to know what we're going to get for benefit because we're going to be 1290 01:55:20,760 --> 01:55:37,820 taking, given them the tax break, that has to still get paid to the money and fee that it has to be it has to be it has to have to come from somewhere. 1291 01:55:40,280 --> 01:55:47,240 So, what's the benefit going to be, because that's also money that's not going to go to other places to different programs for a foreign policy. 1292 01:55:47,240 --> 01:55:55,300 So, when I looked at this agreement, I noted that we're not kidding, we're not kidding in the new units that are affordable. 1293 01:55:56,980 --> 01:56:13,460 Also, the particular property is inherently inexpensive and well below the 60% median threshold of partner rents rental. 1294 01:56:14,220 --> 01:56:18,200 So we're looking at the benefit because we're paying more and they already had a benefit. 1295 01:56:18,380 --> 01:56:20,140 So they're back again for a second benefit. 1296 01:56:20,680 --> 01:56:23,240 So what are we going to get no more new units? 1297 01:56:24,640 --> 01:56:27,860 So maybe a guarantee that it's going to stay low. 1298 01:56:28,580 --> 01:56:40,600 Well, there's nothing that's been presented that I can see that is going to cause these micro apartments micro studios to increase as far as the size and the footprint. 1299 01:56:40,600 --> 01:56:45,100 we're not getting any more units that's not going to change of us which to new buyer they've got 1300 01:56:45,100 --> 01:56:50,460 the same footprint. So if they want to refurbish it or whatever they're going to have to 1301 01:56:50,460 --> 01:56:56,060 expand it in more than a minimum money to make this a different rental value property. So 1302 01:56:57,000 --> 01:57:02,620 I'm asking an urging a no vote because I don't see it going to fit or new for housing with this 1303 01:57:02,620 --> 01:57:06,380 particular agreement and I think you all for your time this evening. Thank you Sean. 1304 01:57:09,930 --> 01:57:14,930 Yes, thank you. I'm sorry. I thought you were done. Thank you so much. 1305 01:57:19,980 --> 01:57:20,680 Thank you. 1306 01:57:22,900 --> 01:57:28,460 So I'm here to talk about the tool library and the RFP response. 1307 01:57:30,720 --> 01:57:37,140 So it's submitted by the Eastside Tool Collective, which has no form right now. 1308 01:57:37,640 --> 01:57:42,940 And they say they're going to operate under physical sponsorship of the South King tool library. 1309 01:57:42,940 --> 01:57:52,440 So I went digging into the IRS database and found this alking tool library, they haven't submitted their tax return for two years. 1310 01:57:53,100 --> 01:58:02,200 So they're right on the verge of losing their tax exempt status and yet the city is anticipating that we would do business with them as a tax exempt organization. 1311 01:58:03,040 --> 01:58:09,260 The RFP response does not include any description of what fiscal sponsorship means. 1312 01:58:09,520 --> 01:58:13,320 Fiscal sponsorship is extremely broad and very complex. 1313 01:58:14,340 --> 01:58:19,540 Sometimes the fiscal sponsor acts on behalf of the organization and sometimes they act 1314 01:58:19,540 --> 01:58:20,000 alongside. 1315 01:58:20,740 --> 01:58:26,140 We don't know, and yet we're going to be asked as a city to make out a check for $100,000 1316 01:58:26,140 --> 01:58:36,440 to presumably South King Tool Library and we have no idea what the relationship between them and the 1317 01:58:36,440 --> 01:58:38,680 the East Side Tool Collective is. 1318 01:58:41,030 --> 01:58:45,770 So if we don't give the money to the Tool Library, the South King Tool Library, 1319 01:58:46,470 --> 01:58:49,810 then somebody's got to pay taxes on it and that's not in the budget. 1320 01:58:51,390 --> 01:58:54,870 So we need to know what legal entity the city's going to be working with. 1321 01:58:54,870 --> 01:58:59,890 Otherwise, the RFP is kind of non-responsive. We just don't know. 1322 01:59:04,140 --> 01:59:14,180 So why is this RFP response so empty and critical financial areas? Why isn't anybody giving it a once over? 1323 01:59:16,350 --> 01:59:18,090 Is the RFP just a formality? 1324 01:59:21,250 --> 01:59:29,090 Oh, well, we're all friends and it's only a hundred thousand dollars. So we really don't have to be very careful about it because we'll sort all this out. 1325 01:59:29,090 --> 01:59:31,150 Well, I don't think so. 1326 01:59:31,430 --> 01:59:33,490 I think $100,000 is a lot of money. 1327 01:59:34,070 --> 01:59:37,670 And I think that before we process this RFP, 1328 01:59:37,730 --> 01:59:39,810 before we have any kind of agreement, 1329 01:59:40,330 --> 01:59:42,110 we have to kind of get out of this one hand, 1330 01:59:42,110 --> 01:59:43,570 washing the other relationship, 1331 01:59:44,170 --> 01:59:46,690 and instead create an arms length relationship 1332 01:59:46,690 --> 01:59:49,670 between the city and our contractor, 1333 01:59:50,670 --> 01:59:52,690 so that we get our money's worth, 1334 01:59:53,050 --> 01:59:55,050 and we know who we're working with, 1335 01:59:55,050 --> 01:59:58,570 and what we're going to get for what we stand. 1336 01:59:59,290 --> 01:59:59,650 Thank you. 1337 02:00:00,210 --> 02:00:03,710 Thank you. All right, Joe Conzler. 1338 02:00:12,250 --> 02:00:13,470 Can everyone hear me? 1339 02:00:14,650 --> 02:00:21,170 Thanks. Hopefully this thing works. New kind of new technology, new, new, new form of zoom. 1340 02:00:22,150 --> 02:00:24,050 So why don't we get through this this quick as I can? 1341 02:00:24,390 --> 02:00:26,330 With two minutes, fifty seconds. 1342 02:00:27,270 --> 02:00:31,010 Really would encourage city of Kirkland to, well, I've asked you to do this before. 1343 02:00:31,210 --> 02:00:33,830 I'll ask you to do it again considering you were marks of a certain balance. 1344 02:00:34,530 --> 02:00:39,170 And then if you felt like you could speak up and say that was wrong and historically untrue 1345 02:00:39,170 --> 02:00:45,910 among other things, that you need to really talk to your friends and readmen, that you need to talk to your friends and 1346 02:00:45,910 --> 02:00:51,030 develop you about getting some counter rules because you're spending a night away from your families here. 1347 02:00:51,750 --> 02:00:54,930 You don't deserve to be compared to mass murdering genocidal monsters. 1348 02:00:55,270 --> 02:00:56,990 I'm not even going to use the word Zimmerman News. 1349 02:00:57,010 --> 02:00:57,670 I know better. 1350 02:00:59,210 --> 02:01:04,230 And I find those kind of equalifications unfair to you and your friends and family. 1351 02:01:05,030 --> 02:01:09,750 I find them unfair to the staff and the community to ask the sit for this. 1352 02:01:10,430 --> 02:01:14,650 This is not why I fought for public comments so hard during and certainly after the pandemic. 1353 02:01:16,630 --> 02:01:19,570 This is not okay the way you're being treated. 1354 02:01:20,330 --> 02:01:23,150 And I think it's incumbent upon you, stand up for each other. 1355 02:01:23,150 --> 02:01:28,430 I pushed boundaries here. Redmond did. It looks like Zimmerman's intimidation going there. 1356 02:01:28,450 --> 02:01:34,130 Mercer Island did. Zimmerman doesn't go there anymore. Seattle really has. 1357 02:01:34,290 --> 02:01:38,890 Zimmerman doesn't go over there anymore. Can I see a pattern? I think I've made my 1358 02:01:38,890 --> 02:01:41,950 point. It's kind of running a bit late when we show how well you say about their 1359 02:01:41,950 --> 02:01:43,370 Thanks all you do. 1360 02:01:46,520 --> 02:01:47,300 Thank you. 1361 02:01:47,600 --> 02:01:50,700 All right, so the clerk does that end our public comments? 1362 02:01:51,400 --> 02:01:53,260 Yes, it does. 1363 02:01:53,740 --> 02:01:55,380 All right, thank you. 1364 02:01:55,960 --> 02:01:58,900 We are now moving on to the consent calendar. 1365 02:01:59,460 --> 02:02:04,240 Before we have the motion, I'd like to ask the deputy mayor to present the audit of counts. 1366 02:02:06,210 --> 02:02:07,830 Thank you, Mayor. Thank you, Mayor. 1367 02:02:07,990 --> 02:02:09,170 We are now moved, I'm sorry. 1368 02:02:10,030 --> 02:02:12,410 I always read from the wrong section there. 1369 02:02:12,410 --> 02:02:19,310 Thank you. We had payroll in the amount of 10 million, 432,835 dollars in 2.6 cents, 1370 02:02:19,310 --> 02:02:24,790 and bills in amount of 12,948,410 dollars, and 90.4 cents. 1371 02:02:26,310 --> 02:02:29,170 Thank you. Is there a motion to approve the consent calendar? 1372 02:02:30,470 --> 02:02:31,110 That was a move. 1373 02:02:32,410 --> 02:02:37,110 Oh, wow. I think that was Councillor Perum, second by Councillor Perum, 1374 02:02:37,110 --> 02:02:38,030 Deputy Mayor, is that right? 1375 02:02:40,580 --> 02:02:42,320 Councillor Perum, were you the motion maker? 1376 02:02:42,320 --> 02:02:51,500 Okay, all right, it's been moved by Councilor Pram 2nd by Deputy Mayor Black to move for this consent calendar is there any discussion. 1377 02:02:53,500 --> 02:02:55,620 All those of the favor, but they say aye. 1378 02:02:57,100 --> 02:02:58,300 Any opposed? 1379 02:02:59,340 --> 02:03:01,460 Motion carries seven zero. 1380 02:03:02,340 --> 02:03:03,400 Thank you. 1381 02:03:04,380 --> 02:03:08,320 All right, we are now moving on to our regular business agenda. 1382 02:03:08,320 --> 02:03:15,420 Our first item of business is on Alternative Delivery of the Peter Kirkpool Project, City Manager, 1383 02:03:20,710 --> 02:03:21,230 you're muted. 1384 02:03:27,460 --> 02:03:30,860 I was brilliant opening, too, and I've just stepped all over it. 1385 02:03:31,300 --> 02:03:31,840 Thank you, Madam Rick. 1386 02:03:32,840 --> 02:03:36,560 So, this is your second presentation on the Alternative Delivery of the Peter Kirkpool Project. 1387 02:03:36,700 --> 02:03:41,240 As you know, it gave us permission to go to the state to see if they would approve the project. 1388 02:03:41,660 --> 02:03:42,360 They did. 1389 02:03:42,360 --> 02:03:47,360 going to hear about that and then it requires under our code visit a council to give staff permission 1390 02:03:47,360 --> 02:03:51,720 to proceed with this as an alternative delivery method. So we're going to have a council 1391 02:03:51,720 --> 02:03:56,960 patient tonight and we are linking for a motion to approve us to move forward here to 1392 02:03:56,960 --> 02:04:01,120 keeping that presentation that's our senior project into your attic Davis. Our city is consultants 1393 02:04:01,120 --> 02:04:05,440 at Turner and Townsend here in our Julie Underwinner Director of Public Works. 1394 02:04:10,470 --> 02:04:11,370 Thank you, City Manager. 1395 02:04:18,060 --> 02:04:21,300 Good evening, Madam Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Black and City Council. 1396 02:04:21,300 --> 02:04:25,140 Thank you for this opportunity to provide an update on the Petergurt pool project. 1397 02:04:27,360 --> 02:04:28,960 We can move to the next slide. 1398 02:04:33,240 --> 02:04:39,840 As the city manager summarized, in June, Council received an overview of the progressive design build 1399 02:04:39,840 --> 02:04:46,040 and supported staff's recommendation to apply to the State's Project Review Committee PRC 1400 02:04:46,040 --> 02:04:48,760 for authorization to use this delivery method. 1401 02:04:49,480 --> 02:04:52,520 Tonight we'll briefly recap the Petergurt pool project 1402 02:04:52,520 --> 02:04:55,400 and why staff continue to recommend progressive design build. 1403 02:04:56,460 --> 02:04:58,960 Then we also summarize the PRC's decision. 1404 02:04:59,360 --> 02:04:59,980 Explain how this... 1405 02:05:00,000 --> 02:05:11,260 The delivery method protects public value, walks through the plan schedule and procurement process, and conclude with recommended council actions for tonight and in the future for this project. 1406 02:05:12,140 --> 02:05:16,400 It sounds like a lot, but it's only 10 slides and we're already 2 down. 1407 02:05:17,940 --> 02:05:26,400 So. All right. Project summary, the Peter Kirkpool project is primarily a renovation project. 1408 02:05:26,580 --> 02:05:32,000 The existing facility has reached a point where investment is needed to address aging building systems. 1409 02:05:32,540 --> 02:05:39,820 The pool shell, the and deck mechanical and electrical systems, accessibility improvements and renovations to the bathhouse. 1410 02:05:40,800 --> 02:05:47,920 With this, the project provides an opportunity to improve the community's experience by replacing the existing waiting pool with a more functional activity. 1411 02:05:47,920 --> 02:05:54,180 people and expanding the Vath House to include family and all-gender changing rooms. 1412 02:05:54,740 --> 02:05:58,980 Her previous council decisions, the scope will not include relocating the pool entrance to 1413 02:05:58,980 --> 02:06:02,740 Kirkland Avenue and exploration of the pool enclosure. 1414 02:06:06,350 --> 02:06:10,450 As shown on this slide, you can, there you go, thanks. 1415 02:06:10,970 --> 02:06:15,870 The project is supported through a combination of impact fees, wheat wine, Kirkland parks, 1416 02:06:15,870 --> 02:06:21,350 and King County Park's levies at the grant, potential debt funding, that financing and 1417 02:06:21,350 --> 02:06:26,950 virtual identified funding package of approximately 11.7 million. The complexity of delivering 1418 02:06:26,950 --> 02:06:31,430 this work within an existing operating aquatic facility and coordinating all of these interconnected 1419 02:06:31,430 --> 02:06:37,470 systems led the staff to recommend progressive design build. Progressive design build is 1420 02:06:37,470 --> 02:06:43,870 well suited for projects that involve technical complexity. I'm known existing conditions and 1421 02:06:43,870 --> 02:06:49,010 challenging schedules, those are exactly the characteristics of our Petercork pool project. 1422 02:06:50,290 --> 02:06:55,370 The project includes specialized aquatic mechanical systems, integrating and integrating new 1423 02:06:55,370 --> 02:07:00,910 systems with existing infrastructure creates uncertainties that are best resolved when the 1424 02:07:00,910 --> 02:07:07,030 contractor can join the team early rather than after the design is complete. At the same time, 1425 02:07:07,090 --> 02:07:11,910 the project must balance immediate infrastructure needs while maintaining seasonal operations. 1426 02:07:11,910 --> 02:07:18,570 Ultimately, progressive design build allows the owner, designer, contractor, and contractor 1427 02:07:18,570 --> 02:07:25,250 to collaborate early to refine scope, improve constructability, manage risk, and develop 1428 02:07:25,250 --> 02:07:28,730 realistic cost information before construction is contracted. 1429 02:07:29,970 --> 02:07:34,290 Those advantages are not available through a traditional design build approach. 1430 02:07:44,630 --> 02:07:49,190 As we summarize earlier, following Council's direction, staff prepared and submitted the 1431 02:07:49,190 --> 02:07:56,070 application to the PRC on June 30th. The application was accepted without any request for 1432 02:07:56,070 --> 02:08:01,370 clarification or additional information and staff presented the project to the committee on July 1433 02:08:02,950 --> 02:08:07,770 24th. The city's presentation team included public works director Julie Underwood, 1434 02:08:08,050 --> 02:08:12,590 Deputy Director of Parks John Lloyd, Parks Planning and Development Manager Mariah Gill, 1435 02:08:13,190 --> 02:08:17,510 and myself. We were supported by Turner and Townsend Hearies serving as our owner advisor and 1436 02:08:17,510 --> 02:08:20,010 of a law group serving as legal counsel. 1437 02:08:21,410 --> 02:08:27,050 After our presentation, questions and discussion, the committee unanimously determined that 1438 02:08:27,050 --> 02:08:33,470 the project satisfies the statutory requirements of RCW-3910 and approved cities request 1439 02:08:33,470 --> 02:08:34,990 to use progressive design build. 1440 02:08:35,770 --> 02:08:40,350 The committee provided positive feedback about the city's preparedness to administer a progressive 1441 02:08:40,350 --> 02:08:41,430 design build project. 1442 02:08:42,030 --> 02:08:47,370 They commended the training completed by staff, our use of an experience owner advisor and 1443 02:08:47,370 --> 02:08:52,890 Council and our efforts to build relationships with peer agencies experienced in progressive 1444 02:08:52,890 --> 02:08:59,170 design-built and aquatic facilities. Overall, a committee described the city as well prepared, 1445 02:08:59,470 --> 02:09:04,210 said this was a good use of public money, and commented that we had picked to the right project 1446 02:09:04,210 --> 02:09:10,830 for progressive design-built. And Stacey, we'll take the next slide. 1447 02:09:12,870 --> 02:09:22,270 So, progressive design build protects the value of public dollars in a couple of ways. 1448 02:09:22,790 --> 02:09:27,890 So, best value selection, this gives us the opportunity to select a team that is most quality 1449 02:09:27,890 --> 02:09:31,210 or not best value qualifications based best value selection. 1450 02:09:31,790 --> 02:09:36,570 So, it gives us the opportunity to select a team that is most qualified to deliver the project, 1451 02:09:36,570 --> 02:09:56,150 both technically and from a process perspective, and that also includes specialty subcontractors and subconsolent, so that's especially applicable to this project with the pool systems, those are very special in nature, and we'll take the right team to deliver the project well. 1452 02:09:56,750 --> 02:09:59,730 It's also based on transparent costs. 1453 02:10:00,000 --> 02:10:08,060 So we'll start working with a team early on to develop exactly what the scope is of the project and what the costs are of the project. 1454 02:10:08,200 --> 02:10:13,320 And it's developed in what's called an open book nature and that's contractual. 1455 02:10:14,800 --> 02:10:22,300 So everything that the contractor team is working on early on in the process is shared with the owner team, transparently. 1456 02:10:22,300 --> 02:10:30,940 So the sub numbers that they're getting from potential partners, they're back up to all of their information, all of the details are there. 1457 02:10:31,240 --> 02:10:41,000 So we as a team can evaluate it and understand if that's good value to the project and we can also use third-party estimators to review that and help understand that as well. 1458 02:10:41,000 --> 02:10:42,920 and then market competition. 1459 02:10:44,060 --> 02:10:47,760 So the design billers selected based on qualifications, 1460 02:10:48,820 --> 02:10:51,820 the subs can be selected on qualifications 1461 02:10:53,020 --> 02:10:55,420 or through competitive subcontractor bidding. 1462 02:10:55,940 --> 02:10:58,220 So we get to have some flexibility in how they're brought on, 1463 02:10:58,380 --> 02:11:03,200 but there is, there there will be some competitive 1464 02:11:03,720 --> 02:11:06,900 big packages and so we know that we're getting the best value there. 1465 02:11:07,080 --> 02:11:10,640 And this is also the delivering method that gives us the best opportunities 1466 02:11:10,640 --> 02:11:18,120 you incorporate along WBE businesses and that's by being able to create the right packages and make 1467 02:11:18,120 --> 02:11:23,400 sure that we have them and also that the contracting is open so we're able to select them in this 1468 02:11:23,400 --> 02:11:24,140 process. 1469 02:11:27,710 --> 02:11:33,850 Moving to my next slide. So this is a big and overarching timeline of the process 1470 02:11:33,850 --> 02:11:41,130 project and what it's intending to show here today is contract milestones and when we'll come back to 1471 02:11:41,130 --> 02:11:46,990 you. So, the blocks are milestones that represent either the first one, 1472 02:11:48,110 --> 02:11:48,110 procurement, 1473 02:11:50,510 --> 02:11:56,010 and contract phases. So, we've signed one contract in progress of 1474 02:11:56,010 --> 02:12:01,730 design build at the very beginning and is for an initial phase of service. And then 1475 02:12:01,730 --> 02:12:11,110 there are amendments that go with that. So, the next time we would come back to 1476 02:12:11,110 --> 02:12:13,850 would be around December. So as soon as we get done with procurement, 1477 02:12:13,990 --> 02:12:16,530 and I'll talk a little bit more about that process on the next slide. 1478 02:12:17,110 --> 02:12:21,410 And that would be for the to approve award of the contract for the initial phase 1479 02:12:21,410 --> 02:12:23,210 of services, which is called validation. 1480 02:12:23,610 --> 02:12:26,050 And we had to spate that to be two to three months. 1481 02:12:27,630 --> 02:12:29,590 And then we would come back again, 1482 02:12:30,810 --> 02:12:35,790 heard approval of the next contract phase, which will likely include the 1483 02:12:35,790 --> 02:12:38,690 early work package that we've talked about, being able to do some of the 1484 02:12:38,690 --> 02:12:43,670 things that need to be done on the pool prior to opening for next season, along with the balance 1485 02:12:43,670 --> 02:12:45,270 of design for the project. 1486 02:12:46,250 --> 02:12:51,250 And then toward the end of design, we come back with what's called the GMP amendment, and that 1487 02:12:51,250 --> 02:12:53,910 is the amendment that enables construction. 1488 02:13:00,990 --> 02:13:05,190 If we're a successful here tonight and you're compelled by our requests to use progressive 1489 02:13:05,190 --> 02:13:09,110 design build, the next step would be to move into a procurement of the project. 1490 02:13:09,250 --> 02:13:14,810 And so on a progressive design build project, what that means is it's a two step, two step 1491 02:13:14,810 --> 02:13:17,790 Qualifications base selection. 1492 02:13:18,530 --> 02:13:20,910 First up being issuing requests for qualifications 1493 02:13:21,350 --> 02:13:23,730 in response to that, we would receive statements 1494 02:13:23,730 --> 02:13:26,590 of qualifications from proposed design built teams. 1495 02:13:26,790 --> 02:13:29,750 Anyone who's interested can submit statement of qualifications. 1496 02:13:30,630 --> 02:13:33,050 Selection committee reviews those qualifications 1497 02:13:33,050 --> 02:13:35,530 to establish a short list. 1498 02:13:35,910 --> 02:13:39,850 The short list then receives the RFP for the project, 1499 02:13:40,630 --> 02:13:43,730 request for proposals, and that phase the team 1500 02:13:43,730 --> 02:13:48,410 developing a management plan where they're telling the three teams who are shortlisted typically 1501 02:13:49,370 --> 02:13:54,270 three, a management plan that talks about how they would approach delivering the project 1502 02:13:54,270 --> 02:14:01,210 for the city. And so during that period, step five there, we would hold interactive meetings. 1503 02:14:01,510 --> 02:14:06,710 And these are unique to progressive design build. Sort of similar to an interview. They're just 1504 02:14:06,710 --> 02:14:10,030 set up a little bit different, and that's what makes them unique and progressive design build. 1505 02:14:10,030 --> 02:14:16,130 And we receive those management plans after those interactive meetings, evaluation committee, 1506 02:14:17,470 --> 02:14:23,250 then evaluates the second step management plans, scores all together, and then you have 1507 02:14:24,530 --> 02:14:30,410 a parent high scoring proposal that you'd go into contract negotiations with. 1508 02:14:30,770 --> 02:14:36,210 And once we've established contract terms, that would be when we'd come back for that initial 1509 02:14:36,210 --> 02:14:37,150 contract approval. 1510 02:14:45,080 --> 02:14:52,920 Because, excuse me, because the city has not yet established a standard process for council oversight of progressive design build projects. 1511 02:14:53,540 --> 02:14:59,620 Staff is proposing a series of decision points that we believe will provide meaningful council oversight. 1512 02:15:00,020 --> 02:15:06,400 Throughout the project, beginning to night with authorization to procure a progressive design billed team. 1513 02:15:07,140 --> 02:15:18,500 After tonight, the next recommended action would be the approval of the design bills contract following the selection of the progressive design builder, which is the process Stacy just outlined in the last slide. 1514 02:15:19,040 --> 02:15:23,640 This is currently anticipated in December of this year or in January. 1515 02:15:23,640 --> 02:15:31,880 At that meeting, we would summarize the procurement process present evaluation results and request authorization to execute the contract. 1516 02:15:32,840 --> 02:15:41,780 After that, staff anticipates completing the validation phase, which confirms that the project scope budget and schedule remained aligned before moving into full design. 1517 02:15:41,780 --> 02:15:58,700 staff would then return to Council, which weren't participating in March, with confirmation of that alignment and a request to proceed with full design development and preliminary design concepts for the replacement activity pool. 1518 02:15:58,840 --> 02:16:01,120 We anticipate bringing to you at that time. 1519 02:16:01,420 --> 02:16:10,840 And then authorization to proceed with any recommended early work packages which would be work before we open in the summer season for 27. 1520 02:16:10,840 --> 02:16:11,240 7. 1521 02:16:13,300 --> 02:16:18,400 Finally, before major construction begins, Council would be asked to approve the negotiated 1522 02:16:18,400 --> 02:16:24,180 guaranteed maximum price to MP for the full project. At that time, we'll present the 1523 02:16:24,180 --> 02:16:29,460 results of any independent cost validation and confirm that the proposed price is fair and 1524 02:16:29,460 --> 02:16:34,720 reasonable before requesting authorization to proceed with construction. As we've discussed, 1525 02:16:34,860 --> 02:16:40,300 these contract amendments are a normal and expected of progressive design build as the project 1526 02:16:40,300 --> 02:16:46,740 advances from design ultimately to construction, the contract is intentionally amended to authorize 1527 02:16:46,740 --> 02:16:51,560 each new phase of work. These plant milestones in the delivery process should not be interpreted 1528 02:16:51,560 --> 02:16:53,160 as change orders. 1529 02:16:55,240 --> 02:16:56,560 So, and then next slide. 1530 02:17:00,130 --> 02:17:02,850 So today's recommendation for this evening staff 1531 02:17:02,850 --> 02:17:07,770 recommends that council authorized staff to proceed with procurement of a progressive design 1532 02:17:07,770 --> 02:17:14,210 team for the Peter Kirkpool project and direct staff to return to Council for approval of the contract. 1533 02:17:15,070 --> 02:17:18,970 Approval tonight's motion allows the staff to begin the competitive procurement process 1534 02:17:19,870 --> 02:17:23,650 and we will return at each major milestone that we've just outlined. 1535 02:17:24,930 --> 02:17:28,930 And that concludes my presentation. Thank you for your time and consideration and we'd be happy 1536 02:17:28,930 --> 02:17:33,470 to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you, Anika and Stacey. 1537 02:17:34,030 --> 02:17:35,470 Council on any questions comments? 1538 02:17:46,130 --> 02:17:47,010 Deputy Mayor. 1539 02:17:51,060 --> 02:17:51,120 Here. 1540 02:17:51,680 --> 02:17:52,280 There you go. 1541 02:17:52,840 --> 02:17:53,940 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 1542 02:17:54,620 --> 02:17:58,080 If there were no questions, I was going to get us started with a motion. 1543 02:17:58,800 --> 02:17:59,340 That sounds fine. 1544 02:17:59,640 --> 02:18:02,200 But it looks like Councillor Falco and does have questions for staff. 1545 02:18:03,460 --> 02:18:04,760 Councillor Falco ahead. 1546 02:18:06,800 --> 02:18:07,820 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 1547 02:18:08,560 --> 02:18:09,660 I just wanted to mention. 1548 02:18:09,820 --> 02:18:11,740 Thank you for. 1549 02:18:11,780 --> 02:18:15,100 I don't remember who mentioned, but mentioned the. 1550 02:18:15,100 --> 02:18:19,280 the kudos that we got on the establishing and network of peer agencies and I just wanted to 1551 02:18:19,280 --> 02:18:24,840 call and thank Ryan Buckup the Lake Washington School District in particular for the work on that 1552 02:18:24,840 --> 02:18:30,540 because that's something that I know we've learned a lot from their expertise and we really 1553 02:18:30,540 --> 02:18:35,640 don't know our partnership with the school district. That's all. Thank you. Thank you. Deputy Mayor 1554 02:18:35,640 --> 02:18:43,220 back to you. Well thank you. So I'll make the motion I move to authorize and direct the city manager 1555 02:18:43,220 --> 02:18:47,780 or does it need to proceed with the progressive design build procurement process for the 1556 02:18:47,780 --> 02:18:52,760 Peter Kirkpool project and return to Council for approval of the contract with the selected 1557 02:18:52,760 --> 02:18:59,960 progressive design builder. Second. When it's been moved by Deputy Mayor Black second by 1558 02:18:59,960 --> 02:19:05,080 Councillor Fairfell Cone to move forward with the progressive design build any further discussion. 1559 02:19:09,170 --> 02:19:15,570 All right, well I just want to thank everybody for the good work and I'm excited to start this 1560 02:19:15,570 --> 02:19:25,630 project. So all those in favor and the motion on the table please say aye. Any opposed? Motion carries seven zero. 1561 02:19:30,120 --> 02:19:36,700 If we are moving on to our next item, which is the draft to a library implementation plan, city manager. 1562 02:19:38,260 --> 02:19:45,600 Okay, thank you, Madam Mayor, so the goal tonight is to present you with the draft response 1563 02:19:45,600 --> 02:19:50,220 to the RFP we had, which the staff deems as being a draft implementation plan for the 1564 02:19:50,220 --> 02:19:55,140 tool library, looking for council direction on whether you'd like us to proceed with discussions 1565 02:19:55,140 --> 02:19:59,300 with the proposal or if there's any other information that you have that you had eaten 1566 02:19:59,300 --> 02:19:59,560 Again. 1567 02:19:59,860 --> 02:19:59,960 So... 1568 02:20:04,260 --> 02:20:14,000 Thank you, City Manager. Good evening, Madam Mayor, Deputy Mayor and members of the council. Happy to be here tonight to provide an update on the draft implementation plan. 1569 02:20:14,580 --> 02:20:24,060 I have nine slides beginning with a brief overview of the project background. We'll then go over a few key pieces of this submitted proposal. 1570 02:20:24,060 --> 02:20:29,860 And we'll conclude with a handful of policy questions that are also outlined in your memorandum. 1571 02:20:30,660 --> 02:20:33,860 And while my presentation is less than 10 slides, there's quite a bit of info. 1572 02:20:34,020 --> 02:20:37,880 So please feel free to raise your virtual hand or your real hand. 1573 02:20:38,080 --> 02:20:39,260 I can see all of you. 1574 02:20:39,680 --> 02:20:45,240 So I will pause to answer any questions that come up prior to the final policy question slide. 1575 02:20:47,930 --> 02:20:49,570 Okay, beginning with a little background. 1576 02:20:49,570 --> 02:20:55,690 Council had expressed interest in exploring a community operated tool library in years past and 1577 02:20:55,690 --> 02:21:00,690 included objectives in both the comprehensive plan and sustainability strategic plan related 1578 02:21:00,690 --> 02:21:06,170 to circular economies, access to hand and electric tools, and reuse of building materials. 1579 02:21:07,150 --> 02:21:11,490 Staff met with the operators of the Seattle and shoreline tool libraries to better understand 1580 02:21:11,490 --> 02:21:16,270 what it takes to launch and sustain a successful tool library and based on those conversations, 1581 02:21:16,270 --> 02:21:20,650 Excuse me, conversations, staff estimated approximately $100,000 1582 02:21:20,650 --> 02:21:25,110 were needed for startup, which counseled and appropriated in the 25-26 1583 02:21:25,110 --> 02:21:28,270 budget with a condition that an implementation plan 1584 02:21:28,270 --> 02:21:30,550 be approved before any funds were released. 1585 02:21:31,650 --> 02:21:35,090 So with that, in March, staff hosted an information sharing 1586 02:21:35,090 --> 02:21:38,150 interest gathering event featuring Seattle 1587 02:21:38,150 --> 02:21:42,510 economies executive director to introduce a concept and discuss 1588 02:21:42,510 --> 02:21:45,170 what it takes to operate a successful tool library. 1589 02:21:45,170 --> 02:22:02,690 And recognizing that volunteers are essential to a successful library staff invited representatives from community organizations, volunteer groups, educational institutions, environmental organizations, business organizations, a total of 123 individuals were invited and 19 people attended. 1590 02:22:03,610 --> 02:22:29,410 So when May staff came to council with a draft scope of work and incorporated council's direction into it and issued the RFP shortly after we received one proposal as a city manager mentioned from the Eastside tool collective and while the RFP was open staff took the opportunity to gather additional community and put at the recycled right event or 70% of respondents indicated they would be somewhat or very likely to use a tool library. 1591 02:22:29,410 --> 02:22:34,090 But, a big caveat, you know, we recognize this isn't a statistically representative survey, 1592 02:22:34,450 --> 02:22:40,170 but it does provide another indicator that there is community interest, respondents also identified location, 1593 02:22:40,390 --> 02:22:43,250 and the variety of tools as the two most important considerations. 1594 02:22:46,770 --> 02:22:52,130 So before discussing the proposal itself, I want to demonstrate how staff has incorporated the direction 1595 02:22:52,130 --> 02:22:56,330 Council provided on my fifth into the scope of work that was included in the RFP. 1596 02:22:56,330 --> 02:23:04,330 The starting at the top first was liability insurance staff worked closely with the city attorney's office and the Washington 1597 02:23:04,330 --> 02:23:13,250 Fitties Insurance Authority, which is the city's insurance authority to ensure the insurance requirements included in the RFP appropriately protect the city. 1598 02:23:14,270 --> 02:23:24,090 Second, a preference for non-city owned location staff revised the evaluation criteria to give preference to proposals recommending a non-city owned location. 1599 02:23:24,090 --> 02:23:33,210 While the proposal we received outlines both a city owned and non city owned option, that preference was reflected in the solicitation. 1600 02:23:34,190 --> 02:23:35,630 Third is limited city involvement. 1601 02:23:36,490 --> 02:23:42,330 The draft scope of work first brought to Council had a greater level of ongoing staff involvement and staff revised that. 1602 02:23:42,470 --> 02:23:51,030 It's a narrow city staff involvement to initial volunteer recruitment and marketing on city social media was ongoing responsibility for operations remaining with the operator. 1603 02:23:51,750 --> 02:23:56,650 Fourth was limiting the city's financial commitment, staff is not proposing any funding beyond 1604 02:23:56,650 --> 02:24:02,050 the 100,000 already appropriated by Council and any future spending would require separate 1605 02:24:02,050 --> 02:24:02,950 council action. 1606 02:24:04,210 --> 02:24:08,470 And finally, Council directed staff to develop an implementation plan before releasing the 1607 02:24:08,470 --> 02:24:09,250 100,000 dollars. 1608 02:24:09,350 --> 02:24:11,090 And that's the purpose of tonight's discussion. 1609 02:24:11,610 --> 02:24:16,130 If Council agrees this proposal provides a sufficient framework, staff would use it as the 1610 02:24:16,130 --> 02:24:20,910 basis for negotiating a final agreement, which would return to Council for approval before 1611 02:24:20,910 --> 02:24:22,190 any funds are released. 1612 02:24:23,430 --> 02:24:27,930 The with Council's direction, we incorporated that feedback into the scope of work, issued the RFP, 1613 02:24:28,190 --> 02:24:33,790 and reached out to all 123 individuals who had been invited to that earlier information 1614 02:24:33,790 --> 02:24:37,170 sharing and interest gathering event to let them know. 1615 02:24:38,210 --> 02:24:38,290 Okay. 1616 02:24:38,590 --> 02:24:39,430 I want to pause here. 1617 02:24:39,570 --> 02:24:42,790 Are there any questions before I jump into the proposal that was received? 1618 02:24:46,950 --> 02:24:47,110 All right. 1619 02:24:47,390 --> 02:24:48,930 Council, any questions on the process? 1620 02:24:53,180 --> 02:24:53,720 Andrea, they're going. 1621 02:24:54,160 --> 02:24:55,160 Thank you. 1622 02:24:55,640 --> 02:24:56,000 All right. 1623 02:24:56,000 --> 02:24:59,980 So, as you mentioned, the city received one proposal from the East Side Tool Collect. 1624 02:25:00,000 --> 02:25:06,300 The staff believes it is responsive and meets the requirements of the Council approve scope of work. 1625 02:25:07,000 --> 02:25:11,960 ETC, eSight Tool Collective, is a coalition of Kirkland residents to intend to form a Washington nonprofit. 1626 02:25:12,660 --> 02:25:17,680 And until that nonprofit is formed, it would operate under the fiscal sponsorship of the South King County Tool Library. 1627 02:25:18,800 --> 02:25:26,220 This proposal maintains that the city would not own or operate the Tool Library and states that the city's role would be limited to providing one-time startup funding, 1628 02:25:26,220 --> 02:25:32,300 assisting with identifying location, supporting initial volunteer recruitment, and helping promote the program. 1629 02:25:33,120 --> 02:25:40,280 Responsibility for implementation, operation, staffing, programming, and long-term financial sustainability would remain with the operator. 1630 02:25:43,370 --> 02:25:48,950 Okay, the proposal represents two possible facility options, characterized as tracking and track B. 1631 02:25:49,510 --> 02:25:57,570 Track A would utilize a portion of the fire logistics building and track B is a containerized model with the location still to be determined. 1632 02:25:57,570 --> 02:26:03,390 And at this point, staff has not completed due diligence on either option as draft implementation 1633 02:26:03,390 --> 02:26:06,490 plan was requested by Council before deciding whether or not to proceed. 1634 02:26:07,050 --> 02:26:11,730 The staff is recommending that if Council likes to continue forward into negotiations that 1635 02:26:11,730 --> 02:26:16,690 both tracks remain under consideration, because additional due diligence is needed before we can 1636 02:26:16,690 --> 02:26:18,150 recommend one over the other. 1637 02:26:23,880 --> 02:26:29,640 A proposal includes many, many of the operational details outlined in the RFP, including a membership 1638 02:26:29,640 --> 02:26:34,640 model borrowing policies and an online reservation and inventory system. 1639 02:26:40,280 --> 02:26:44,700 And as previously mentioned, staff worked with WCA and the city attorney's office to ensure 1640 02:26:44,700 --> 02:26:48,520 the insurance requirements were appropriate, including naming the city as an additional 1641 02:26:48,520 --> 02:26:52,340 insured and providing proof of insurance within 10 days of contract execution. 1642 02:26:53,280 --> 02:26:58,580 The proposal also includes borrow agreements, liability waivers, safety training for higher risk 1643 02:26:58,580 --> 02:27:01,740 equipment and routine inspection and maintenance procedures. 1644 02:27:01,740 --> 02:27:02,980 The 1645 02:27:05,700 --> 02:27:10,220 city's financial commitment remains limited to the original $100,000 appropriation. 1646 02:27:10,740 --> 02:27:15,260 Any additional funding would require future council approval, long-term sustainability 1647 02:27:15,260 --> 02:27:20,000 would be the operators responsibility through memberships, grants, donations, workshops, 1648 02:27:20,820 --> 02:27:23,540 and other revenue sources that they deem appropriate. 1649 02:27:27,070 --> 02:27:32,590 That is the extent of the background and update to council on the draft implementation plan. 1650 02:27:32,970 --> 02:27:36,210 Tonight we're looking for council's direction on these policy questions. 1651 02:27:36,210 --> 02:27:41,570 Madam Mayor, I'd like to turn it to you for discussion, beginning with the first bullet. 1652 02:27:44,440 --> 02:27:44,920 Thank you, Andrea. 1653 02:27:45,340 --> 02:27:53,980 So Council, the first bullet is, does the proposal will provide enough information as a draft implementation plan to start negotiating agreement? 1654 02:27:54,200 --> 02:27:57,440 And if not, what specific information do you need? 1655 02:28:11,230 --> 02:28:12,070 Council Minister Arnold. 1656 02:28:14,590 --> 02:28:15,270 Thank you, Mayor. 1657 02:28:16,290 --> 02:28:21,890 I just wanted to comment, I don't have any information that I need here. 1658 02:28:21,890 --> 02:28:34,750 really did appreciate the amount of research in detail in the East Side Tool Collective Proposal including the work that they had done to learn from and coordinate with existing tool libraries. 1659 02:28:34,930 --> 02:28:50,390 The fact that they're matching a lot of this will allow for economies of scale and both for how they coordinate a Kirkland tool library with these others or perhaps expand throughout the East Side. 1660 02:28:50,390 --> 02:28:58,550 So I was impressed and I believe that this draft implementation plan provides a level of detail. 1661 02:28:59,430 --> 02:29:00,750 I was looking forward. Thank you. 1662 02:29:01,750 --> 02:29:02,530 All right. Thank you. 1663 02:29:03,770 --> 02:29:06,830 Councillor Pascale, I had two next. Did you lower your hand? 1664 02:29:09,720 --> 02:29:11,160 Yes. That's a yes. Councillor interjecting. 1665 02:29:12,800 --> 02:29:18,680 Yeah. I just want to say also just thank you to the team that initiated this initiative. 1666 02:29:18,680 --> 02:29:25,320 I think, and for working so hard in trying to get a tool library into our community. 1667 02:29:25,880 --> 02:29:30,780 I think the ETC proposed actually had a lot of really good information and details. 1668 02:29:32,060 --> 02:29:36,020 And so I honestly don't think I need any more information. 1669 02:29:36,620 --> 02:29:41,240 I think the ETC proposal is sufficient to begin negotiations. 1670 02:29:42,840 --> 02:29:48,660 And I think negotiations at this stage will really provide and refine a lot of the details. 1671 02:29:48,660 --> 02:29:54,960 I identify risks and really ensure that the city interests are will be protected, including, 1672 02:29:55,280 --> 02:29:59,980 because I just want to comment on this, the prior comment that was made about this. 1673 02:30:04,400 --> 02:30:18,040 I think that those things will be evaluated. But yeah, I think at this point, just getting the negotiations started is the appropriate next step. 1674 02:30:18,040 --> 02:30:20,920 All right. Thank you. Councillor Pascill. 1675 02:30:25,690 --> 02:30:30,250 Thank you, Mayor. Are we voting on anything tonight 1676 02:30:30,250 --> 02:30:36,570 then or are we just offering comments and direction? If Council wanted to decide between 1677 02:30:36,570 --> 02:30:42,210 track A or track B, we would request that that is done through motion. But others in that were 1678 02:30:42,210 --> 02:30:50,990 not requesting a vote. Okay. Well, sorry. Sorry. I do think you would want a motion authorizing 1679 02:30:50,990 --> 02:30:52,670 staff to proceed with negotiations, 1680 02:30:54,690 --> 02:30:56,690 whether or not you're choosing the options or not. 1681 02:30:58,530 --> 02:31:02,010 Sorry, City Manager, you're easy to handle. I'll try to do that next time. 1682 02:31:04,590 --> 02:31:08,950 So, Councillor Pascale, we will be deciding whether to move forward with negotiations. 1683 02:31:10,430 --> 02:31:15,390 Yeah, so I'll just say my comments for the discussion on that. You know, once we have a motion there. 1684 02:31:16,430 --> 02:31:19,250 Okay. All right. City manager go ahead. 1685 02:31:20,150 --> 02:31:26,130 Yeah, I just I guess it's just want to follow up with that to say that and the intent is to bring a final deal back for council review. 1686 02:31:26,870 --> 02:31:30,670 So permission to proceed today is not still saying yes to the final. 1687 02:31:32,360 --> 02:31:33,820 Yeah, thank you for that clarification. 1688 02:31:35,000 --> 02:31:40,840 And any more comments on information needed for the draft implementation plan. Councilor Feltcome. 1689 02:31:43,850 --> 02:31:47,530 Thank you, Madam Mayor. I was just raising my hand because I was ready to move on to the next question. 1690 02:31:47,530 --> 02:31:54,970 figure. It looks like everybody else is, so go ahead. Great, thank you. Well, first, I agree 1691 02:31:54,970 --> 02:32:00,950 with my council colleagues comments. Thank you to staff that have been working on this, to 1692 02:32:00,950 --> 02:32:07,470 community members who have expressed just so much interest in this project, and also to the 1693 02:32:07,470 --> 02:32:11,730 East Side tool collective. I know it took a lot of work, and I also agree in response to the first 1694 02:32:11,730 --> 02:32:15,650 question that there was a lot of really detailed information you can tell they did their homework, 1695 02:32:15,650 --> 02:32:24,350 And obviously we'll make sure as a city that we do our due diligence to make sure every T is crossed and I dotted to make sure that this is a successful facility. 1696 02:32:25,030 --> 02:32:37,650 You know, reading the memo, it was really clear to me that between track A and B, track A seems to be the clear choice to proceed with because it's 1697 02:32:37,650 --> 02:32:45,230 It results in a better facility, a better quality facility for the community, and it's less initial set up cost, right? 1698 02:32:45,570 --> 02:32:52,190 And so to me that seems a clear option. And so I'm ready to make a motion whenever you're ready, 1699 02:32:52,290 --> 02:32:57,230 met a mayor, but also happy to wait if you want more discussion before motion's on the table. 1700 02:33:03,020 --> 02:33:12,580 Yeah just discussion on this particular item. I really appreciate the description in the 1701 02:33:12,580 --> 02:33:19,580 implementation plan of the advantages of using the five station. This is a facility right now currently 1702 02:33:19,580 --> 02:33:30,900 that's simply being used for storage and I support examining whether it could be used on a temporary 1703 02:33:30,900 --> 02:33:32,540 basis for the tool library. 1704 02:33:35,000 --> 02:33:42,760 But want more staff input on the impacts of that and information 1705 02:33:42,760 --> 02:33:51,060 on how long that temporary could be given the city's medium and long-term plans for this particular 1706 02:33:51,060 --> 02:33:57,640 building. So, you know, I'd like to see the value in keeping both tracks in consideration, 1707 02:33:58,800 --> 02:34:09,920 but unless staff comes up with more additional information that says there is 1708 02:34:11,880 --> 02:34:19,040 better use or an immediate need for Fire Station 27. I really like the idea of using that 1709 02:34:19,040 --> 02:34:25,060 on a temporary basis in the next couple years. Thank you. 1710 02:34:25,060 --> 02:34:29,220 Thank you. Deputy Mayor, before I call on you, I'm going to let City Manager respond. 1711 02:34:29,560 --> 02:34:30,500 Good evening. 1712 02:34:32,710 --> 02:34:38,170 So the only I want to add is part of the reason that staff, particularly me, is to 1713 02:34:38,170 --> 02:34:41,090 and then you're recommending keeping both tracks going as, 1714 02:34:41,090 --> 02:34:43,430 as Onrona mentioned, we haven't done a ton of due diligence. 1715 02:34:43,630 --> 02:34:45,690 There is capacity in Station 27, 1716 02:34:46,070 --> 02:34:48,910 and there is some exciting opportunities to call it okay. 1717 02:34:49,670 --> 02:34:51,590 But we haven't explored, for example, 1718 02:34:51,830 --> 02:34:54,470 and I'll just pick up two examples that may not be the case. 1719 02:34:55,290 --> 02:34:58,050 If the city had a condition that the East Side took 1720 02:34:58,050 --> 02:34:59,970 collective, that was tourist. 1721 02:35:00,920 --> 02:35:09,560 We might want to make sure we have the opportunity to look at it in other options. So, for example, they said, we need a minimum five-year commitment for the station, which they have said. 1722 02:35:10,040 --> 02:35:22,120 And we said, sorry, we can only give you a two-year commitment. We just want us to ability to say, if this isn't the right place or something new developed, I mean, to give you 30-day status to get out and they were to say, that's not sufficient notice. 1723 02:35:22,120 --> 02:35:27,740 We haven't had a chance to really sit down and explore all those issues yet, and so it is highly likely 1724 02:35:27,740 --> 02:35:31,100 or we should have driven on session 27, but there's certainly some possibilities I should envision 1725 02:35:31,800 --> 02:35:37,020 where there are expectations for the same site and our expectations may not quite align and we might want to 1726 02:35:37,020 --> 02:35:39,260 have now that we've been exploring others at the same time. 1727 02:35:39,400 --> 02:35:42,880 So that's the only reason staff is proposed to have the two tracks. 1728 02:35:48,470 --> 02:35:49,530 Captain Emear. 1729 02:35:52,850 --> 02:35:53,430 Well, thank Mayor. 1730 02:35:54,370 --> 02:35:59,530 I'm not going to add anything to what see manager just said, but I do want to plus one. 1731 02:36:00,710 --> 02:36:13,490 council member Arnold that I think track me might be the right direction to go, but before I make that final decision, I definitely want as much information I possibly can from staff. 1732 02:36:14,230 --> 02:36:20,130 So, and it sounds like city managers prepared to provide us as part of next steps and negotiation. 1733 02:36:20,830 --> 02:36:27,470 There is one more bullet point, which is, is there anything else to Council will want to see in the agreement. 1734 02:36:27,750 --> 02:36:35,930 It's not so much what I want to see in the agreement, but, you know, I did want to, I assume that as part of any, 1735 02:36:37,870 --> 02:36:45,850 just proceeding to the next step and further negotiations, you know, staff is going to be looking at proof of incorporation, 1736 02:36:45,850 --> 02:36:56,530 group of structure and ownership and 501C3 status, insurance, certificate of insurance, 1737 02:36:56,830 --> 02:36:58,430 naming Kirkland as additional. 1738 02:36:58,590 --> 02:37:03,950 Sure, all of those things are I assume, and I guess this is the question for staff, 1739 02:37:04,290 --> 02:37:09,810 I assume, are part of this next step, part of these discussions, this negotiation, and 1740 02:37:09,810 --> 02:37:14,290 before there's a final agreement, all of these boxes will be, will be checked. 1741 02:37:14,450 --> 02:37:15,010 Is that fair? 1742 02:37:15,010 --> 02:37:17,930 that is absolutely correct, Deputy Mayor. 1743 02:37:19,610 --> 02:37:19,790 Great. 1744 02:37:20,970 --> 02:37:22,470 I don't have anything else to add. 1745 02:37:22,730 --> 02:37:23,450 Thank you. 1746 02:37:24,410 --> 02:37:24,930 Thank you. 1747 02:37:25,050 --> 02:37:27,890 I'm going to go back to Council Member Felco. 1748 02:37:28,930 --> 02:37:30,210 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 1749 02:37:31,170 --> 02:37:32,450 I have a question for the City Manager 1750 02:37:32,450 --> 02:37:33,830 just about next steps. 1751 02:37:35,090 --> 02:37:36,530 So obviously I think we're hearing 1752 02:37:36,530 --> 02:37:39,070 the strong preferences for track A 1753 02:37:39,070 --> 02:37:41,450 and track B kind of as a last resort 1754 02:37:41,450 --> 02:37:42,990 if nothing else can work out. 1755 02:37:42,990 --> 02:37:47,610 So my question is, um, what are the plan next steps? 1756 02:37:47,630 --> 02:37:52,330 If we have, if we approve adopted emotion tonight to ask staff to go back with both options 1757 02:37:52,330 --> 02:37:56,910 still on the table, are you then coming back to check in to say this is more information on 1758 02:37:56,910 --> 02:38:02,230 the two options, and which ones you want to pick, and then we make another motion to say bring 1759 02:38:02,230 --> 02:38:08,350 us back, final, and a final agreement with one of those because I assume the final agreement 1760 02:38:08,350 --> 02:38:16,390 We'll take some work after we give you directional, which option, right, and so how much more work does that create? 1761 02:38:16,470 --> 02:38:24,450 Because it was initially my understanding that our motion tonight was going to be to direct you to negotiate in order to bring us back 1762 02:38:24,450 --> 02:38:31,850 final, a final agreement, but it sounds like that may not be the case, might be another check-in. 1763 02:38:32,850 --> 02:38:40,910 Well, it took me so my intent would be to spend the time to figure out a proposal and partnership with ETC and bring that back for your approval. 1764 02:38:42,010 --> 02:38:47,810 So, here in the council's preference, we start with sitting down together at the fire station, logistics center. 1765 02:38:48,770 --> 02:38:54,670 What are you hoping to do? How are you hoping to do it for how long? How does all this work and the city staff assessing? 1766 02:38:55,450 --> 02:38:58,530 Not just their proposal, but what are our needs? So I could just give an example. 1767 02:38:58,530 --> 02:39:04,190 if if for these ages and half the fire station there's a big event how do we ensure that 1768 02:39:04,190 --> 02:39:09,830 not for the public goes into the fire station side of things right so do we need 1769 02:39:09,830 --> 02:39:14,270 initial investments like dates or things like that so there's just a lot of details 1770 02:39:14,270 --> 02:39:19,050 that need to be worked out in the course of that discussion it's possible to run into some 1771 02:39:19,050 --> 02:39:23,770 things that we can't work out together I doubt it but it's it's possible and only if they said 1772 02:39:23,770 --> 02:39:24,750 And this isn't enough. 1773 02:39:24,830 --> 02:39:25,770 It can't work out for us. 1774 02:39:26,770 --> 02:39:30,010 And we conclude ourselves that they've asked for, we just can't give. 1775 02:39:30,270 --> 02:39:33,350 Would we probably start looking at the other option, but we probably have a couple ideas 1776 02:39:33,350 --> 02:39:34,190 of mine as we go. 1777 02:39:34,390 --> 02:39:38,910 But the intent would be to say, in partnership with ETC, would come to a one option. 1778 02:39:39,310 --> 02:39:41,390 That's agreed to for Council review it. 1779 02:39:42,390 --> 02:39:42,830 So. 1780 02:39:42,830 --> 02:39:43,070 I'm sorry. 1781 02:39:43,610 --> 02:39:47,510 I guess my follow question related to that is 1782 02:39:50,870 --> 02:39:53,150 at what point is it accounts over to staff 1783 02:39:53,150 --> 02:39:56,730 decision to pivot to option B if we give you authority to go to vote, right? 1784 02:39:56,730 --> 02:39:59,970 because I can imagine there could be a situation where... 1785 02:40:00,000 --> 02:40:08,260 You know, you may think that it's not feasible to move forward with track A, but council may want to say, well, we do want to concede on that thing and we do want to make it happen. 1786 02:40:08,960 --> 02:40:17,960 I guess that's my question, is how will we navigate that? Is it that if we move forward with track A, you don't need another track end point? 1787 02:40:18,420 --> 02:40:29,580 But if you think that you need to go with track B, then you come back to council for authorization for track B, I just feel like it's a big step to say, you know, 1788 02:40:29,580 --> 02:40:30,980 do whichever one you want, right? 1789 02:40:30,980 --> 02:40:32,600 And then I would hate for you to come back 1790 02:40:32,600 --> 02:40:35,420 with track B and I say, well, actually, you know, 1791 02:40:36,660 --> 02:40:37,980 we want you to push harder, we're, 1792 02:40:37,980 --> 02:40:38,260 we're, okay. 1793 02:40:39,640 --> 02:40:41,620 Uh, I mean, thank you, Gelsarbe, good. 1794 02:40:41,860 --> 02:40:42,660 I, I hear you. 1795 02:40:42,660 --> 02:40:44,000 So no, the goal, 1796 02:40:46,700 --> 02:40:48,520 the goal is not for staff to decide. 1797 02:40:48,640 --> 02:40:50,200 The goal is we've been given direction 1798 02:40:50,200 --> 02:40:51,720 and that the preference has been expressed 1799 02:40:51,720 --> 02:40:53,780 in the go see if we could work so far. 1800 02:40:53,840 --> 02:40:55,200 I guess what I would say is, 1801 02:40:55,360 --> 02:40:57,080 if I felt like I had a place where there was 1802 02:40:57,080 --> 02:40:59,080 several phenol flaws or something to counsel me 1803 02:40:59,080 --> 02:41:01,280 where I've, before there was the pivot, 1804 02:41:01,280 --> 02:41:04,180 I would come back and say, hey, here are the two things that you've reached. 1805 02:41:05,320 --> 02:41:06,020 I wanted my time. 1806 02:41:06,080 --> 02:41:09,220 I've been a little bit of doing dealing just about what the alternatives might be, you know, 1807 02:41:09,260 --> 02:41:13,880 it could be here or it could be here, so that if you have that information and you are 1808 02:41:13,880 --> 02:41:16,880 getting to save information about the fatal flaw, you know, at least know what the alternative 1809 02:41:16,880 --> 02:41:17,960 might be. 1810 02:41:18,360 --> 02:41:23,540 But no, the goal isn't that we would just say, hey, tomorrow high, Citibandra have decided 1811 02:41:23,540 --> 02:41:26,460 to track the, and that's what we're going to talk about, right? 1812 02:41:26,460 --> 02:41:31,460 But as I said, because we're trying to really respect the council's direction that you 1813 02:41:31,460 --> 02:41:35,960 have not made a decision go ahead and you haven't made a decision to use the fire station 1814 02:41:35,960 --> 02:41:40,960 logistics center, we just haven't done all the due diligence we need to make sure it works. 1815 02:41:42,360 --> 02:41:46,480 And in partnership with the Central Collective, so we just need some time to work through that. 1816 02:41:46,700 --> 02:41:48,920 But I think we'd come back, if we said, here's two hurdles. 1817 02:41:49,860 --> 02:41:51,540 Do you want us to jump them or not? 1818 02:41:51,640 --> 02:41:53,920 And here's the pros of cons of it. 1819 02:41:53,920 --> 02:41:57,600 You know, we would definitely do that for a gave you a final decision. 1820 02:41:58,900 --> 02:42:03,200 We will be yours, no matter what, because you'll get the final agreement for your people. 1821 02:42:06,640 --> 02:42:08,300 Thank you. 1822 02:42:08,500 --> 02:42:08,900 Are you done? 1823 02:42:09,580 --> 02:42:12,740 The city manager, so would it help you to follow up on Councillor Falkham? 1824 02:42:12,840 --> 02:42:17,280 Would it help you if we were clear on what our preference is? 1825 02:42:18,060 --> 02:42:18,200 Okay. 1826 02:42:19,300 --> 02:42:19,900 Thank you. 1827 02:42:20,100 --> 02:42:20,740 Councillor Falkham. 1828 02:42:21,700 --> 02:42:21,820 Okay. 1829 02:42:22,300 --> 02:42:25,720 And I think I can answer that question correctly now. 1830 02:42:25,720 --> 02:42:29,920 So I do support keeping both options on the table, 1831 02:42:30,320 --> 02:42:31,780 but definitely prefer track A. 1832 02:42:32,060 --> 02:42:34,200 I think it's just a cleaner, cleaner look, 1833 02:42:34,680 --> 02:42:38,880 easier access points, and I think overall it just 1834 02:42:38,880 --> 02:42:39,880 seems more straightforward. 1835 02:42:40,860 --> 02:42:44,160 So I definitely would prefer track A, but definitely 1836 02:42:44,160 --> 02:42:47,540 open to both depending on where the negotiations 1837 02:42:47,540 --> 02:42:48,100 land. 1838 02:42:48,900 --> 02:42:50,780 And then the last question of just what 1839 02:42:50,780 --> 02:42:53,940 the final agreement, just things that we would want 1840 02:42:54,400 --> 02:42:55,240 in the agreement. 1841 02:42:55,240 --> 02:42:58,940 I would say just queer performance expectations, 1842 02:43:00,000 --> 02:43:03,000 a payment schedule also based on milestones. 1843 02:43:03,940 --> 02:43:09,260 So I don't think the intent is that we would be sending a $100,000 check. 1844 02:43:09,640 --> 02:43:13,840 It would be based off of certain milestones over a period of time. 1845 02:43:14,420 --> 02:43:19,900 And then just financial responsibilities and then defined exit 1846 02:43:19,900 --> 02:43:24,160 or modification for provisions, if the program for some reason, 1847 02:43:24,160 --> 02:43:28,460 does not achieve like that. It comes that that we want. 1848 02:43:32,560 --> 02:43:35,640 Thank you. Councilor Pascal, we are going to 1849 02:43:35,640 --> 02:43:38,680 to an initiation. So did you have some things you wanted to share? 1850 02:43:42,660 --> 02:43:46,560 Sure. I mean, I have a 1851 02:43:46,560 --> 02:43:53,620 roll comments on. Wait a minute. Waiting for the motion. Okay. Councilor Premier, 1852 02:43:53,860 --> 02:43:58,940 how do you handle still that? Okay. Councilor Matimchins, did you have something you want to say? 1853 02:43:58,940 --> 02:44:01,700 Is somebody making a motion? 1854 02:44:02,660 --> 02:44:05,440 I'll go back to Councilmember Felcon for the motion. 1855 02:44:06,240 --> 02:44:08,600 Thank you, Madam Mayor, and bear with me. 1856 02:44:08,760 --> 02:44:11,640 I'm trying to modify language on the fly to wait. 1857 02:44:11,740 --> 02:44:16,740 Before we get to a motion, I had a quick comment, 1858 02:44:17,000 --> 02:44:19,660 responding to Councilmember Prims comments. 1859 02:44:20,320 --> 02:44:21,080 Go ahead, Councilmember. 1860 02:44:21,700 --> 02:44:22,240 Okay. 1861 02:44:23,100 --> 02:44:32,460 Council Member, Prime Minister asked about whether the city's contribution is delivered as a lump sum or some form of progress payments. 1862 02:44:34,960 --> 02:44:44,400 And that's something I would like some more information about versus given direction for one direction or not. 1863 02:44:44,400 --> 02:44:54,160 We've had some previous experience in seedings and nonprofits like the Kirkland Community Foundation and more recently, 1864 02:44:54,860 --> 02:44:59,800 East Trail partners, where Kirkland and other East Trail members made. 1865 02:45:00,000 --> 02:45:12,840 So we have to start that organization. Both organizations have been successfully launched and are now self-sufficient and provide more value than the initial investment as we had hoped. 1866 02:45:14,000 --> 02:45:24,960 And so I think we have a successful model. I'll just curious, how have handled that model in the past and whether it's just been okay. Here's your initial seed money and your reporting obligations. 1867 02:45:28,910 --> 02:45:30,230 Go ahead, see you, Major. 1868 02:45:31,970 --> 02:45:34,230 Yeah, it really depends on each case. 1869 02:45:34,690 --> 02:45:36,630 In every case there has to be an agreement. 1870 02:45:37,190 --> 02:45:39,850 Right, illegal agreement that shows the public benefit 1871 02:45:39,850 --> 02:45:42,550 to cities receiving for the money that's provided. 1872 02:45:43,770 --> 02:45:46,650 And so cases like you've mentioned, for example, 1873 02:45:47,850 --> 02:45:50,610 with the creative foundation, the agreement had to pay it 1874 02:45:50,610 --> 02:45:53,050 out over a three-year period and an expectation 1875 02:45:53,050 --> 02:45:54,830 that other fundraising occurred. 1876 02:45:55,850 --> 02:45:57,610 Another example is we've given things directly 1877 02:45:57,610 --> 02:45:59,010 to like the East Trail. 1878 02:45:59,910 --> 02:46:02,690 It really depends on what we sit down and negotiate. 1879 02:46:03,410 --> 02:46:07,930 So I think the staff's initial intent was not just to say, 1880 02:46:07,930 --> 02:46:10,150 here is a front, but to have an agreement 1881 02:46:10,150 --> 02:46:11,770 that set out milestones reporting, 1882 02:46:12,270 --> 02:46:14,490 but we also haven't sketched that out yet. 1883 02:46:14,990 --> 02:46:17,430 So council feedback on that would be very helpful 1884 02:46:17,430 --> 02:46:19,590 if there's things you prefer, things you don't prefer. 1885 02:46:20,250 --> 02:46:22,430 But typically we would just give it all up front 1886 02:46:22,430 --> 02:46:23,610 in one lump sum. 1887 02:46:25,530 --> 02:46:27,250 Without a specific set of outcomes 1888 02:46:30,890 --> 02:46:38,010 Thank you, City Manager. I think that addresses my objections and would support whatever comes 1889 02:46:38,010 --> 02:46:44,870 forward through negotiations in the agreement with what you see as fit for protecting the city. 1890 02:46:45,590 --> 02:46:53,250 Thank you. Thank you. Anyone else? Council Member Falcon. Thank you, Madam Mayor. 1891 02:46:53,870 --> 02:46:58,670 I'm going to authorize staff to proceed with negotiations based on the tool library 1892 02:46:58,670 --> 02:47:04,970 implementation plan and to return to Council with either a proposed contract for consideration 1893 02:47:04,970 --> 02:47:13,890 of track A or a check-in with Council to consider proceeding with track B if track A seems 1894 02:47:14,590 --> 02:47:15,230 infusible. 1895 02:47:15,670 --> 02:47:15,690 Second. 1896 02:47:18,800 --> 02:47:21,240 Thank you and good job pulling that together. 1897 02:47:22,720 --> 02:47:24,360 It's the measure of greed. 1898 02:47:24,660 --> 02:47:29,300 It's been moved by Councillor Feltcone, I'm not going to repeat that second by Councillor 1899 02:47:29,300 --> 02:47:32,020 and reprim accounts for your past goal? 1900 02:47:38,000 --> 02:47:42,920 Yeah, I have some thoughts on the discussion that we've had so far, 1901 02:47:43,180 --> 02:47:44,860 and I want to speak to this motion. 1902 02:47:45,560 --> 02:47:48,160 But first, I just wanted to thank staff 1903 02:47:48,160 --> 02:47:50,200 for all the work you put into this. 1904 02:47:50,740 --> 02:47:53,660 And I want to start by also emphasizing that. 1905 02:47:53,660 --> 02:47:56,600 I do think a tool library does seem like a good idea. 1906 02:47:57,320 --> 02:48:00,800 But the concerns I want to talk about regarding this concept 1907 02:48:00,800 --> 02:48:03,840 really are how the city's role in it. 1908 02:48:03,840 --> 02:48:06,660 And so the first thing is, I honestly don't, 1909 02:48:06,740 --> 02:48:09,880 wasn't convinced that it was a financially sustainable proposal. 1910 02:48:10,760 --> 02:48:14,340 We only received one proposal and it's financial plan 1911 02:48:14,340 --> 02:48:18,340 relies heavily on a variety of unsubstantiated assumptions. 1912 02:48:18,980 --> 02:48:21,860 I don't see evidence that outside funding has been secured. 1913 02:48:22,800 --> 02:48:24,660 And before investing taxpayer dollars, 1914 02:48:24,840 --> 02:48:28,340 I really do think we need greater confidence in this organization 1915 02:48:28,340 --> 02:48:32,880 that this organization can succeed and has secured financial backing 1916 02:48:32,880 --> 02:48:35,400 and support already from other community organizations. 1917 02:48:36,380 --> 02:48:41,180 And I see this because it's my understanding that the short line to the library was funded 1918 02:48:41,180 --> 02:48:45,840 by the Washington Department of Ecology, King County Solid Ways, and the cities of 1919 02:48:45,840 --> 02:48:48,620 Shoreline and Lake Forest Park for entities. 1920 02:48:49,080 --> 02:48:54,720 Here we have one city alone offering $100,000 with no other committed financial backing. 1921 02:48:55,380 --> 02:48:59,900 And so I think to limit our risk, we really should require additional financial backing 1922 02:48:59,900 --> 02:49:03,320 for partner organization, so our money is matched against other money. 1923 02:49:04,080 --> 02:49:09,360 Second, I still have a lot of concerns about the city's long-term commitment. 1924 02:49:09,620 --> 02:49:16,360 I know that there's language in there about not needing more money, but that RFP intentionally 1925 02:49:16,360 --> 02:49:22,200 favored proposals that did not rely upon city property, get the preferred option and 1926 02:49:22,200 --> 02:49:26,100 our discussion here so far, still focuses on the fire logistics building. 1927 02:49:26,100 --> 02:49:33,220 I think that this is going to create additional public subsidy that's not reflected on going costs. 1928 02:49:33,540 --> 02:49:39,940 It's going to raise questions about city space needs, liability, maintenance and other ongoing resources. 1929 02:49:40,940 --> 02:49:51,560 And then finally, one subject that hasn't been talked about that I've heard and that I feel is I really have concerns about whether this process has been above reproach. 1930 02:49:51,560 --> 02:49:59,120 when public funds are involved, decisions really have to be fair, but they also must be perceived as fair. 1931 02:50:00,000 --> 02:50:14,060 The former council member participated in a bunch of decisions that funded this program, including a vote, to approve tax fair dollars in last December, and is today the primary contact on the only proposal we received. 1932 02:50:14,800 --> 02:50:24,560 I think that puts us the entire council and staff in a difficult position. These relationships require an even higher level of transparency and scrutiny, I believe. 1933 02:50:24,560 --> 02:50:29,540 It also raises a question whether we need to be looking at our code of ethics and whether 1934 02:50:29,540 --> 02:50:34,380 that should be updated to designated waiting period after someone leaves office before they 1935 02:50:34,380 --> 02:50:38,540 can lobby councilor staff on behalf of a client organization. 1936 02:50:39,280 --> 02:50:44,340 I believe this situation does raise some ethical concerns with the public and it makes me 1937 02:50:44,340 --> 02:50:45,800 as a council member very uncomfortable. 1938 02:50:46,820 --> 02:50:53,580 But I know I'm in the minority on this that others majority is going to agree on any of what 1939 02:50:53,580 --> 02:51:02,860 said, but I would request the following one that we require additional committed financial backing 1940 02:51:02,860 --> 02:51:10,820 to show that this is a real proposal. I'm not in support of track A, but if that was 1941 02:51:10,820 --> 02:51:23,560 for or before that was for it, I'd like to understand and do a full review of our space 1942 02:51:25,900 --> 02:51:31,360 I don't, I don't understand, it sounds like the site tool collective is not a legal entity and 1943 02:51:31,360 --> 02:51:33,840 is going to be sponsored by the South came tool library. 1944 02:51:34,580 --> 02:51:37,680 So is that a legal arrangement, is that going to work for us? 1945 02:51:38,340 --> 02:51:43,500 And is that other entity in good standing with the IRS, or is there other issues there? 1946 02:51:43,540 --> 02:51:46,160 I think we need to look into that and make sure. 1947 02:51:46,800 --> 02:51:52,020 And then finally, at some point, not now, but later, we do need to look into our ethics 1948 02:51:52,020 --> 02:51:58,900 about situations of departed council members. We have a strong ethics code about existing and 1949 02:51:58,900 --> 02:52:04,140 sitting council members, but we also need to think about one council member's leave office. 1950 02:52:04,780 --> 02:52:07,700 Many other organizations have that actually at our cities and counties. 1951 02:52:09,800 --> 02:52:14,900 So those are the things that are on my mind right now with this proposal. Thank you. 1952 02:52:15,040 --> 02:52:15,940 Thank you. 1953 02:52:18,720 --> 02:52:19,500 Anyone else? 1954 02:52:25,120 --> 02:52:25,120 Definitely. 1955 02:52:27,970 --> 02:52:29,390 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 1956 02:52:30,210 --> 02:52:33,410 I want to speak up on just two things. 1957 02:52:33,410 --> 02:52:36,030 One, I realized I missedpoke earlier. 1958 02:52:36,910 --> 02:52:38,590 I think my comments were clear. 1959 02:52:39,710 --> 02:52:44,590 I met Track A and I met that my comments were, 1960 02:52:44,590 --> 02:52:58,670 you know, I do want to make sure that as we evaluate Track A is perhaps the primary track that we do get as much information as we possibly can from staff about what that will mean. 1961 02:52:58,670 --> 02:53:03,830 I don't think a full review of our space needs is realistic. 1962 02:53:06,070 --> 02:53:12,570 That would delay implementation for a very long time to do a full strategic plan on all 1963 02:53:12,570 --> 02:53:17,670 the city space needs, but I think we're, I think, staff is hearing that we all want 1964 02:53:17,670 --> 02:53:26,790 to make sure we understand what the impacts are of track A and use of station 27 on at 1965 02:53:26,790 --> 02:53:36,630 start near term space allocation. My last comment is I'll look to city manager city attorney, 1966 02:53:38,010 --> 02:53:43,110 but I fully expect that any negotiated agreement we're going to have reps and warranties, 1967 02:53:43,230 --> 02:53:48,870 we're going to have financial covenants. We're going to have all the sort of standard 1968 02:53:49,630 --> 02:53:55,610 clauses and protective clauses that are going to ensure that the organization is incorporated 1969 02:53:55,610 --> 02:54:04,230 that it has the financial backing, his represented that it will have, so I look to, I look 1970 02:54:04,230 --> 02:54:10,690 to staff to do that diligently and proficiently in the next stage, and I'll be curious to see 1971 02:54:10,690 --> 02:54:16,470 what that looks like when it comes back, but I think you've heard that we want those protections, 1972 02:54:16,790 --> 02:54:24,330 but I also know that that's the kind of thing that staff would be doing as a matter of its professional 1973 02:54:24,330 --> 02:54:33,710 proficiency. Thank you. Thank you. Councilor Arnold. Thank you, Mayor. 1974 02:54:35,810 --> 02:54:36,050 First 1975 02:54:37,050 --> 02:54:43,850 want to respond to one of the points that Councilor Pascill brought up. The whole process 1976 02:54:43,850 --> 02:54:51,350 of starting a new 501C3 is fairly common. I was involved in this with another organization 1977 02:54:51,350 --> 02:54:57,290 where there is an existing 501c3 that provides the fiscal sponsorship. 1978 02:54:57,630 --> 02:54:59,970 And what that allows is for... 1979 02:55:00,000 --> 02:55:11,840 Tax deductible contributions to go to the new organization, as it gets set up with its own approved 501C3 status. 1980 02:55:12,500 --> 02:55:21,720 It is in the East Side Tool Collective's interest in ensuring that their fiscal sponsor is in good standing, 1981 02:55:22,000 --> 02:55:27,560 because that allows them to do fundraising that's tax deductible. 1982 02:55:27,560 --> 02:55:33,320 So I'm confident that whatever questions that came up during public comment at our meeting 1983 02:55:33,320 --> 02:55:34,560 tonight can be addressed. 1984 02:55:35,640 --> 02:55:44,420 Secondly, to wrap up, I did conversations with Council last week at O.O. 1985 02:55:44,420 --> 02:55:45,200 Denny Park. 1986 02:55:46,520 --> 02:55:53,520 And while the proposal from east side to a library includes some people that have been 1987 02:55:53,520 --> 02:56:02,100 involved in community and former council member suites in that have been passionate about this 1988 02:56:02,100 --> 02:56:08,880 and wanting to put this together. I also had three people come and want to talk in support 1989 02:56:08,880 --> 02:56:15,340 of the tool library with me during conversations with council that were the people that that 1990 02:56:15,340 --> 02:56:23,340 programs target that these were people that we hadn't seen before that people that I had just 1991 02:56:23,340 --> 02:56:26,600 met for the first time that we're excited about the opportunity. 1992 02:56:27,620 --> 02:56:31,260 And so I think there is support for this 1993 02:56:31,260 --> 02:56:32,520 and I'm excited to move forward. 1994 02:56:32,880 --> 02:56:33,880 Thank you. 1995 02:56:35,990 --> 02:56:36,470 Thank you. 1996 02:56:36,530 --> 02:56:37,330 Councillor and Tunches. 1997 02:56:37,890 --> 02:56:39,970 Thank you. 1998 02:56:40,610 --> 02:56:42,570 Um, you know, evaluating this proposal, 1999 02:56:42,890 --> 02:56:44,810 I looked at three factors. 2000 02:56:45,830 --> 02:56:47,270 One was community support. 2001 02:56:47,490 --> 02:56:49,790 The second was financial sustainability 2002 02:56:49,790 --> 02:56:51,930 and third was the process. 2003 02:56:53,670 --> 02:56:59,050 I was told months ago that neighborhood organizations and the Kirkland Association of Neighborhoods 2004 02:57:00,150 --> 02:57:05,630 were going to be supportive of this and offer letters of support. 2005 02:57:06,070 --> 02:57:09,190 I haven't seen that materialized. 2006 02:57:10,830 --> 02:57:16,550 On May 5th, I also received an email from the chair of the Kirkland Community Foundation. 2007 02:57:17,290 --> 02:57:27,310 That email was in his official capacity and represented that in his official capacity that there was support for the tool library. 2008 02:57:28,030 --> 02:57:33,170 The subject of that may fit the email was statement in support of tool library and Kirkland. 2009 02:57:35,070 --> 02:57:41,810 That led me to believe three months ago that the Kirkland Community Foundation was deeply involved in this, that they supported it, 2010 02:57:41,810 --> 02:57:46,730 and that there would be community support and likely financial support coming from the community 2011 02:57:46,730 --> 02:57:47,330 foundation. 2012 02:57:49,490 --> 02:57:52,850 Yesterday I clarified this with the Executive Director of the Kirkland Community 2013 02:57:52,850 --> 02:58:00,070 Foundation and she clarified that the Kirkland Community Foundation has no formal position on the 2014 02:58:00,070 --> 02:58:06,150 tool library. They have pledged zero dollars and they have contributed the zero dollars to this 2015 02:58:06,150 --> 02:58:06,750 library. 2016 02:58:09,690 --> 02:58:15,450 I also looked at the financial sustainability of this model. And I've noted that 2017 02:58:15,450 --> 02:58:20,390 they have not yet raised any money, they have not yet sold any memberships, and they do not 2018 02:58:20,390 --> 02:58:27,290 yet have any money in the bank, as far as I know. Their business plan includes $42,000 out of 2019 02:58:27,290 --> 02:58:34,530 our $100,000, which would potentially be spent on the salary of an executive director of a 2020 02:58:34,530 --> 02:58:35,170 library. 2021 02:58:37,400 --> 02:58:43,140 I believe that when they, we started this, this was generally going to be a community 2022 02:58:43,140 --> 02:58:51,360 driven by volunteers and not that we were needing to spend almost half of the money contributed 2023 02:58:52,400 --> 02:58:54,880 on the salary of an employee. 2024 02:58:58,720 --> 02:59:03,040 I don't think $100,000 will be the end of this. I think we will get 2025 02:59:03,040 --> 02:59:08,860 a lifetime subscription of supporting this tool library because I haven't seen any evidence 2026 02:59:09,600 --> 02:59:11,620 that they have financial support. 2027 02:59:13,940 --> 02:59:16,620 I also looked at the process by which we followed. 2028 02:59:18,380 --> 02:59:20,100 We have one RFP response 2029 02:59:21,080 --> 02:59:22,560 and no others. 2030 02:59:25,210 --> 02:59:29,750 Council member Pasco's concerns about the ethical implications of this 2031 02:59:30,350 --> 02:59:36,090 and the perception that the community will have are directly on point 2032 02:59:36,430 --> 02:59:38,310 and right on target. 2033 02:59:40,540 --> 02:59:45,060 I have serious concerns about moving forward with this. I think that the 2034 02:59:45,060 --> 02:59:51,860 idea of a tool library is a good one and I appreciate staff to work on this. But this is not 2035 02:59:51,860 --> 02:59:57,240 currently investable. It's not currently ready for an infusion of capital. I support either 2036 02:59:57,240 --> 02:59:58,160 terminating. 2037 03:00:01,650 --> 03:00:12,590 This project, or I support moving forward with additional work to get additional RFP, it's proposals. 2038 03:00:13,450 --> 03:00:25,390 We should be able to select from three, five, or more RFP proposals from a broad selection of organizations that are qualified to do this. 2039 03:00:25,390 --> 03:00:33,950 The appearance of one RFP proposal does not, in my opinion, look proper. 2040 03:00:34,870 --> 03:00:41,890 I'd like to see more RFP proposals if we're serious about this, and I will be voting now on this motion. 2041 03:00:41,890 --> 03:01:10,170 And the tool library, and as a concept, is one, which I think is worth pursuing, but with one proposal, I think the best option right now is to move forward with soliciting other proposals from other organizations so that we have several qualified organizations to evaluate. 2042 03:01:10,170 --> 03:01:11,730 Thank you. 2043 03:01:13,780 --> 03:01:15,640 Thank you, Governor. 2044 03:01:18,760 --> 03:01:22,520 Thank you, Madam Mayor. I just wanted to speak up one more time 2045 03:01:22,520 --> 03:01:28,220 as for the motion and address some of the comments from my colleagues. I appreciate this conversation. 2046 03:01:30,060 --> 03:01:38,160 You know, I do want to note that if you are planning to form a 501c3 corporation is not going to become a 2047 03:01:38,160 --> 03:01:43,800 surprise that you are not going to raise money until you have your 501c3 status and those contributions 2048 03:01:43,800 --> 03:01:55,400 are indeed tax deductible. I'm not overly concerned about funding a position within a position 2049 03:01:55,400 --> 03:02:03,340 within a project like this. We did that with the community foundation. We supported the executive 2050 03:02:03,340 --> 03:02:09,520 director, salary. So we've done this kind of support in the past with organizations including 2051 03:02:09,520 --> 03:02:17,120 earmarked to support individual staff. And we don't always have the benefit of multiple RFPs 2052 03:02:17,120 --> 03:02:23,180 with East Trail with the community foundation. They were the organizations that 2053 03:02:24,060 --> 03:02:29,320 had stepped forward to deliver on the goals and objectives that were going to deliver community 2054 03:02:29,320 --> 03:02:34,680 benefits and that was in the absence of any RFP. Sometimes you put out an RFP and you just 2055 03:02:34,680 --> 03:02:40,000 do in fact, I get the one response and then when that happens you evaluate that response 2056 03:02:40,560 --> 03:02:46,540 on its merits, which I think we're doing in this case, including directing the staff in many 2057 03:02:46,540 --> 03:02:52,940 ways to make sure that they are doing their, they're taking the diligent approach to these negotiations. 2058 03:02:53,660 --> 03:03:05,870 So I appreciate that and then I'm trying to think that there's any other points that I wanted to make, but I think that that covers it. 2059 03:03:06,110 --> 03:03:09,510 Obviously I will be supporting the motion to proceed with the next step. 2060 03:03:11,190 --> 03:03:12,490 Thank you. Councilor Prim. 2061 03:03:13,210 --> 03:03:13,290 Yeah. 2062 03:03:13,350 --> 03:03:17,430 She's had a very quick question for city manager or. 2063 03:03:17,430 --> 03:03:25,910 So in the agreement that we have, and I just want to address this whole financial 2064 03:03:25,910 --> 03:03:47,410 sustainability issue that Councilmember Pascal and Timchism have brought to light, is there 2065 03:03:47,410 --> 03:03:57,210 a arrangement within the agreement itself, so that we are only paying out funds when we know 2066 03:03:57,210 --> 03:04:03,550 or have some confidence that the entity will be financially viable or that we're getting 2067 03:04:03,550 --> 03:04:08,590 external support or that they are getting external support. 2068 03:04:11,720 --> 03:04:16,720 by the city of turn into. So, the turners, yes. 2069 03:04:18,760 --> 03:04:20,640 I would say, I guess two things, two things that 2070 03:04:20,640 --> 03:04:24,860 one is at least the way the council appropriated the money and the conversation was that the 2071 03:04:24,860 --> 03:04:30,980 intent of this money was to be startup money, right? So, it's not year three money, once they're 2072 03:04:30,980 --> 03:04:35,840 going. However, having said that, I think the intent of the staff is to say, you know, what is your 2073 03:04:35,840 --> 03:04:39,220 plan? How is the fundraising going and set milestones of reporting? 2074 03:04:42,080 --> 03:04:43,900 And so I think it is our intent 2075 03:04:43,900 --> 03:04:49,780 to have an agreement that is helping insurers financially viable and still doing our due diligence 2076 03:04:49,780 --> 03:04:50,260 on that. 2077 03:04:50,320 --> 03:04:55,980 But I do think there's clearly an intent, at least, of the council that this is helping 2078 03:04:55,980 --> 03:04:56,680 in that, right? 2079 03:04:56,920 --> 03:04:59,960 And so it's a key starting point, whether that's for staff or whether it's- 2080 03:05:00,000 --> 03:05:08,540 First, start a concert, who purchases and so forth. It's to help them go off the ground, but I think we would be looking very carefully at their next steps, particularly being stopped. 2081 03:05:08,860 --> 03:05:21,080 Council feedback, but also our own due diligence is now that, you know, we got to go ahead, which two days they hadn't been given, you know, what is your fundraising plan and how successful it's being. We have a few months to figure that out while we need to go change the agreement. 2082 03:05:22,160 --> 03:05:29,000 So it'd be my intent to help report on that when we come back to you and say, the last three months since he last saw, this here's what's happened. 2083 03:05:29,000 --> 03:05:31,340 and here's how we feel good about it don't. 2084 03:05:32,480 --> 03:05:33,420 Okay, thank you. 2085 03:05:33,640 --> 03:05:35,660 We'll see you there. 2086 03:05:35,960 --> 03:05:37,680 Okay, anyone else? 2087 03:05:39,860 --> 03:05:41,920 I'm gonna take a shot at this. 2088 03:05:42,700 --> 03:05:47,500 I will be supporting the motion as Councilor Arnold was clear. 2089 03:05:48,280 --> 03:05:51,240 There is a lot of public enthusiasm for this 2090 03:05:51,240 --> 03:05:53,300 and we have been talking about it for years 2091 03:05:53,300 --> 03:05:55,440 and I think it'll serve the community well. 2092 03:05:55,840 --> 03:05:58,800 I am in support of I have a preference 2093 03:05:58,800 --> 03:06:01,000 for Fire Station 27. 2094 03:06:02,340 --> 03:06:16,040 I agree with Debbie Mayor that we do not want to slow down this project while we do a strategic plan for long-term use of our public buildings, but I do feel like we need a plan. 2095 03:06:16,380 --> 03:06:28,160 We have a number of buildings that we are bringing online and I would like to see how all that space is going to be used over the years and that's including the buildings that we're exploring for public works. 2096 03:06:29,140 --> 03:06:39,060 And I want, I need, I feel, I need to respond to the criticism of community leaders that have served our community for decades. 2097 03:06:40,820 --> 03:06:47,340 The, the allegation that there's an ethics violation, this money is not going into anyone's pockets. 2098 03:06:47,340 --> 03:06:56,140 These are people who have bent over backwards to serve our community and many, many capacities. 2099 03:06:57,060 --> 03:07:05,740 And I am grateful to them for championing this project, for taking their own personal time to put it together, 2100 03:07:06,240 --> 03:07:10,160 to rally the community, to get feedback from the community. 2101 03:07:10,160 --> 03:07:18,960 I think they've done a good job and I don't think it's fair to criticize them for it and make any sort of allegations. 2102 03:07:18,980 --> 03:07:22,940 Oh, you don't get the last word on this. If you want to retort, you don't get it. 2103 03:07:22,940 --> 03:07:25,640 Men were too good to get this. I don't want to get this. 2104 03:07:25,640 --> 03:07:27,240 And as fair to retort. 2105 03:07:27,460 --> 03:07:28,780 I'm going to remember Tim Tim. 2106 03:07:30,440 --> 03:07:34,420 I have waited and throughout the work last. 2107 03:07:34,660 --> 03:07:36,200 Council member Tim Cheson. 2108 03:07:37,780 --> 03:07:47,120 So, I have finished my remarks, and if Councilor Timch is an I.C. Councilmember Prim, would like to raise her hand. Thank you, Councilmember Prim. 2109 03:07:51,700 --> 03:07:59,100 Councilmember Prim, did you have your hand up? All right. Okay. The question is on the motion made by Councilmember Falcone. 2110 03:07:59,620 --> 03:08:04,180 Second by Councilmember Prim. Councilmember Falcone, will you do us the favor of repeating your motion? 2111 03:08:10,640 --> 03:08:12,960 Would you like to repeat it? 2112 03:08:15,500 --> 03:08:17,520 Councillor Falkan, you're muted. 2113 03:08:20,520 --> 03:08:21,220 Thank you. 2114 03:08:21,500 --> 03:08:21,860 Thank you. 2115 03:08:22,120 --> 03:08:22,280 Yes. 2116 03:08:22,940 --> 03:08:23,760 City of China, that would be wonderful. 2117 03:08:24,080 --> 03:08:24,740 Thank you. 2118 03:08:24,980 --> 03:08:26,080 I'll repeat that for you. 2119 03:08:26,300 --> 03:08:31,040 I made a motion to authorize staff to proceed with negotiations based on the tool library 2120 03:08:31,040 --> 03:08:36,020 implementation plan, and to return to Council either with a proposed contract for consideration 2121 03:08:36,660 --> 03:08:41,280 that uses track A or a check in with Council on track B if track A proves invisible. 2122 03:08:43,940 --> 03:08:44,580 All right. 2123 03:08:45,260 --> 03:08:49,660 Thank you City Attorney. All those of the favour please say aye. 2124 03:08:52,560 --> 03:08:54,140 All those opposed? 2125 03:08:55,040 --> 03:08:56,580 No. No. 2126 03:08:59,250 --> 03:09:01,370 Motion carries 5-2. 2127 03:09:02,070 --> 03:09:04,690 Thank you everyone. It is now 9-17. 2128 03:09:05,030 --> 03:09:07,810 So we're going to take a break and we will be back at 9-30. 2129 03:22:09,710 --> 03:22:19,870 Sorry about that, because I can get log back in. So, all right. So, so this is our check in on affordable housing, on faith, on land, 2130 03:22:20,090 --> 03:22:27,930 but it is her council direction tonight before we go back to the planning commission. I've heard a walk it's your draft code proposal is. 2131 03:22:28,150 --> 03:22:30,330 Sounds like our Deputy Director of Planning and Building. 2132 03:22:31,130 --> 03:22:39,690 Thank you, City Manager, and good evening Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and Council members. We're here tonight to give you our second briefing to you on the Affordable House. 2133 03:22:39,690 --> 03:22:46,970 on faith-owned the land project. This is a task on the adopted 2026 to 2028 planning work program 2134 03:22:46,970 --> 03:22:52,250 and its intention is to implement state legislation that the city is required to comply with. 2135 03:22:52,510 --> 03:22:57,190 I have ten slides of information for you tonight. Before I jump in, I wanted to note that 2136 03:22:57,190 --> 03:23:02,150 our lead senior planner on this project is Scott Guter. Scott's not able to be here tonight, 2137 03:23:02,770 --> 03:23:06,610 so I will do my best to represent the good work that he has done on this project. 2138 03:23:07,530 --> 03:23:13,090 We last talked to you about this project back in May and at that time we asked you for 2139 03:23:13,090 --> 03:23:20,510 some scoping direction at that time Council told us to base any density bonuses given to 2140 03:23:20,510 --> 03:23:25,910 faith owned land that's providing affordable housing to base those bonuses on underlying 2141 03:23:25,910 --> 03:23:31,270 zone standards, where those faith based properties are located, you asked us to provide a 2142 03:23:31,270 --> 03:23:38,950 right, permission for those bonuses, plan commission, iterated on the Council direction and 2143 03:23:38,950 --> 03:23:46,150 emphasized that the codeman, which should add flexibility, but to keep the increases fairly modest, 2144 03:23:46,390 --> 03:23:49,090 particularly in low density zone areas. 2145 03:23:51,720 --> 03:23:54,860 Since we talked to you, staff has been out doing quite 2146 03:23:54,860 --> 03:24:01,700 a bit of outreach primarily with faith-based organizations and also with consortiums and organizations 2147 03:24:01,700 --> 03:24:07,540 that represent multiple stakeholders whether it be faith-based organizations or affordable housing 2148 03:24:07,540 --> 03:24:12,920 developers. We've also been coordinating very closely with Arch on this project to help 2149 03:24:12,920 --> 03:24:17,000 understand some of the market and feasibility context that goes into providing 2150 03:24:17,940 --> 03:24:23,700 developments that include a high percentage of affordable housing units that are income restricted. 2151 03:24:26,240 --> 03:24:32,040 From that outreach, we really heard a few things and you heard them already tonight in your 2152 03:24:32,040 --> 03:24:35,640 of what comment period, we really heard from faith-based organizations 2153 03:24:35,640 --> 03:24:38,600 that they would appreciate very straightforward process, 2154 03:24:39,120 --> 03:24:42,560 both them and affordable housing developers appreciate flexibility. 2155 03:24:42,960 --> 03:24:46,040 That's really key given that affordable housing, 2156 03:24:46,160 --> 03:24:48,580 especially when provided as a higher percentage 2157 03:24:48,580 --> 03:24:51,940 of a total development is difficult to make feasible 2158 03:24:51,940 --> 03:24:53,640 in this market and always. 2159 03:24:54,300 --> 03:24:57,160 So flexibility was really key for a lot of them. 2160 03:24:57,400 --> 03:24:59,680 From the faith-based organizations specifically, 2161 03:24:59,680 --> 03:24:59,980 Leave it. 2162 03:25:00,000 --> 03:25:07,840 We did iterate what you heard earlier tonight that they aren't affordable housing developers in and of themselves. They really don't hold that expertise inherently. 2163 03:25:09,260 --> 03:25:16,320 And so also noted that there will be a need for some support beyond code amendments programmatically. 2164 03:25:18,000 --> 03:25:25,100 And with that feedback, we really took that to cart and tried to incorporate it into our code amendments presented to tonight. 2165 03:25:25,100 --> 03:25:30,100 And I'll talk through how we did that in the codemannments in just a moment here. 2166 03:25:31,920 --> 03:25:36,580 Before I jump into a summary of the codemannments that were included in your packet, 2167 03:25:37,400 --> 03:25:44,380 I did want to note just go over briefly a map of the existing faith owned properties in Kirkland. 2168 03:25:44,720 --> 03:25:49,100 So there are 37 organizations we found that operate in Kirkland today. 2169 03:25:49,100 --> 03:25:58,800 those 37 organizations own 64 total parcels for a total of 160 acres in the city. Many 2170 03:25:58,800 --> 03:26:04,800 of those parcels are quite large and you can probably think of them. So 19 of them are 2171 03:26:04,800 --> 03:26:10,920 more than two acres and a lot of those faith-based organizations that you see actually own 2172 03:26:10,920 --> 03:26:15,380 several underlying parcels that comprise one subject property that they may be operating at. 2173 03:26:15,380 --> 03:26:26,380 A little over half of those parcels exist today in low density residential zones, just a couple of them are in medium or high density residential zones. 2174 03:26:26,900 --> 03:26:37,300 And then remaining approximately 40% are in zones that already allow a little bit denser development, either office commercial institutional or transit oriented development zones. 2175 03:26:37,300 --> 03:26:48,880 And then several of the zones, this kind of similar and all of Kirkland, but several of the properties do contain critical areas that would need to be factored into future development. 2176 03:26:51,690 --> 03:26:58,430 So with that, I want to quickly review what's in your packet, just give you a summary of the draft code amendments. 2177 03:26:58,430 --> 03:27:08,270 The draft code amendments would add a new section to our affordable housing chapter in the Kirkland zoning code and they would be based on what the state told us we had to do. 2178 03:27:08,410 --> 03:27:23,750 So the state requires us to provide some type of capacity bonus for properties or developments that are providing either 50% of their total units at 80% AMI or 20% of their units at 50% AMI. 2179 03:27:23,750 --> 03:27:28,750 And that's more than we require as part of our, any of our affordable housing requirements today. 2180 03:27:28,910 --> 03:27:37,150 So this would be beyond what we require in our current code in the state requires us to provide some density bonuses for development that's doing that. 2181 03:27:37,650 --> 03:27:43,250 So as it's drafted, it would only be applicable on parcels that are owned by a faith-based organization. 2182 03:27:43,250 --> 03:27:55,190 And to put it simply, what we did was we looked at the existing underlying zones, and we provided a modest density increase on based on underlying zoning. 2183 03:27:55,330 --> 03:28:05,230 So we basically took a low density zone and said, what's the average height allowed in a low density zone and what would kind of an incremental step up to the next density zone. 2184 03:28:05,230 --> 03:28:10,890 be and that's how we looked at what their height bonus would be. And the same we looked at the 2185 03:28:10,890 --> 03:28:14,650 medium density zone, what's the average height and medium density zones for residential 2186 03:28:14,650 --> 03:28:20,650 development and gave them an incremental step up to a high density zone. So what's what that relates 2187 03:28:21,310 --> 03:28:28,290 to a result in is that in low density zones we have a few varying heights across the city in those 2188 03:28:28,290 --> 03:28:33,830 low density zones. We've talked about that a little bit with you before, but on average a lot of them 2189 03:28:33,830 --> 03:28:40,510 have a 30-foot maximum building height for residential development today. Under this bonus, they would 2190 03:28:40,510 --> 03:28:46,670 get up to 35 feet. If they were providing that state-required minimum amount of affordable housing, 2191 03:28:48,530 --> 03:28:53,210 and then in medium density, they would go from 35 to 40. So a modest height increase. 2192 03:28:54,050 --> 03:29:01,090 Lot coverage was another standard that we heard could help if projects kind of become feasible 2193 03:29:01,090 --> 03:29:09,370 If we were flexible with that and for that, one of the things that we focused on was making sure that if an organization wanting to 2194 03:29:09,370 --> 03:29:17,370 can tend to operate that faith-based facility that the standards were flexible enough that they can continue to operate their 2195 03:29:17,370 --> 03:29:23,850 place of worship and also provide some affordable housing on sites. So we factor that into looking at 2196 03:29:23,850 --> 03:29:29,830 coverage and based the bonuses for a lot coverage on the lot coverage allowed to that 2197 03:29:29,830 --> 03:29:31,150 faith-based facility. 2198 03:29:34,060 --> 03:29:40,080 Some of the other standards that we would propose to give these types 2199 03:29:40,080 --> 03:29:45,600 of developments are exempting them all from design review. I think it's important to note that 2200 03:29:45,600 --> 03:29:51,720 low-density zones don't require design review today so when we look at the sites across the city 2201 03:29:51,720 --> 03:29:56,460 It's not exempting many sites that wouldn't already be inherently exempt from design review, 2202 03:29:56,800 --> 03:29:59,240 but these types of developments wouldn't be. 2203 03:29:59,900 --> 03:29:59,960 Also. 2204 03:30:00,000 --> 03:30:07,940 We're removing where it exists, any maximum density, so a limit of units per acre, and floor area ratio standards. 2205 03:30:08,420 --> 03:30:16,700 I know Council's got a lot of feedback from a lot of housing developers that are floor area ratio standards can be quite restrictive, so removing that for these types of developments. 2206 03:30:17,340 --> 03:30:26,520 I already talked a little bit about flexible lock coverage. We also propose in the draft code being more flexible about required yards or setbacks. 2207 03:30:26,520 --> 03:30:33,740 And then also allowing for the planning and building director to approve my or deviations from the code. 2208 03:30:34,380 --> 03:30:42,540 So we have heard from the affordable housing development community that projects often need to vary just a little bit from zoning standards. 2209 03:30:42,700 --> 03:30:45,540 It's hard to write zoning standards that cover every situation. 2210 03:30:45,880 --> 03:30:52,080 And so in the spirit of trying to provide a streamlined path for these projects to happen. 2211 03:30:52,080 --> 03:31:03,560 We did add into the code an allowance for the planning and building director to administratively approve some minor deviations if one is needed to make a project work. 2212 03:31:06,940 --> 03:31:15,620 So what I've gone over so far is kind of like the base bonus that we would give these types of developments that are providing a high amount of affordable housing units. 2213 03:31:15,620 --> 03:31:19,000 And the next two slides are sort of add-ins. 2214 03:31:19,380 --> 03:31:20,400 That staff is proposing. 2215 03:31:21,120 --> 03:31:23,940 And the first is an additional height bonus. 2216 03:31:24,260 --> 03:31:26,200 And so in the draft code that you've seen, 2217 03:31:26,660 --> 03:31:28,740 we've offered an additional height bonus. 2218 03:31:29,080 --> 03:31:32,000 If a development chooses to provide more 2219 03:31:32,000 --> 03:31:34,440 than that standard that we covered. 2220 03:31:34,860 --> 03:31:38,100 So more than 20% of their units at 50% 2221 03:31:38,100 --> 03:31:42,240 any of my or more than 50% of their units at 80% any of my. 2222 03:31:42,240 --> 03:31:58,060 If they did that, they would be able to get some additional height, so up to a maximum of 50 feet and low density zones and up to a maximum of 60 feet and medium density zones, and then up to a 25 foot bonus and other zones. 2223 03:31:58,060 --> 03:32:12,880 I note that these extra heights do come with additional setback requirements written into the code so the higher they got above that kind of base bonus the more those buildings would have to be stepped back a little to mitigate impacts to adjacent properties. 2224 03:32:12,880 --> 03:32:20,360 And in terms of how this would work, we are still drafting this into our final proposal, 2225 03:32:20,620 --> 03:32:32,040 but what staff is thinking is that what we would do is require a set percentage of additional units that would have to be provided for a development to be eligible for this additional height bonus. 2226 03:32:34,540 --> 03:32:44,740 The other option that staff is proposing in the code is providing an exchange ratio that would allow development to give us different AMI levels. 2227 03:32:44,760 --> 03:32:51,440 in their project, whether they choose to do a variety or a range of units within one project 2228 03:32:51,440 --> 03:32:57,940 or provide all of them at 40% AMI instead of 50% AMI, we wanted to provide an exchange ratio 2229 03:32:57,940 --> 03:33:03,400 to give them more flexibility to make a project work or meet needs or preferences of the 2230 03:33:03,400 --> 03:33:08,180 face-based organization that they're working with. This should be a familiar concept to council. 2231 03:33:08,380 --> 03:33:12,840 You have adopted exchange ratios for several other affordable housing requirements across 2232 03:33:12,840 --> 03:33:19,900 the city including in the station area and through the Juanita cars more recently and so we're 2233 03:33:19,900 --> 03:33:26,660 proposing that that same concept be applied for this affordable housing on faith-based property 2234 03:33:26,660 --> 03:33:27,980 type of development. 2235 03:33:31,500 --> 03:33:34,540 And lastly, in addition to the code, staff has also been 2236 03:33:34,540 --> 03:33:39,460 concentrating what other support services beyond the code amendments could be helpful to faith-based 2237 03:33:39,460 --> 03:33:45,380 organizations undertaking this type of development. Our ideas for that that don't need to be 2238 03:33:45,380 --> 03:33:49,500 that we could programatically implement are offering free 2239 03:33:49,500 --> 03:33:52,540 pre-submittal conferences and perhaps expedited permit review. 2240 03:33:53,440 --> 03:33:56,340 And then, as I mentioned, we've been coordinating very closely with 2241 03:33:56,340 --> 03:34:00,080 arch and they have a lot of support available to these 2242 03:34:00,080 --> 03:34:03,160 faith-based organizations in terms of supporting due diligence, 2243 03:34:03,420 --> 03:34:05,980 helping with feasibility studies, and also kind of connecting 2244 03:34:05,980 --> 03:34:09,160 people with networks that might help them realize 2245 03:34:09,160 --> 03:34:11,640 goals if they want to do something like this. 2246 03:34:12,980 --> 03:34:18,340 With that, with the feedback we get tonight, we will finalize those draft code amendments. 2247 03:34:18,600 --> 03:34:22,420 We're currently scheduled to take them to planning mission for a public hearing on August 2248 03:34:23,120 --> 03:34:29,440 27th, and tonight would love some feedback from Council on any of the bonus development standards 2249 03:34:29,440 --> 03:34:35,360 and also any specific guidance on the concepts of the additional height bonus or the proposed exchange ratios. 2250 03:34:35,600 --> 03:34:37,320 And with that, I will hand it back to you, Madam here. 2251 03:34:39,960 --> 03:34:40,400 Thank you. 2252 03:34:40,520 --> 03:34:41,960 I'll see you did a great job. 2253 03:34:42,320 --> 03:34:42,480 So. 2254 03:34:42,480 --> 03:34:43,100 All right. 2255 03:34:43,180 --> 03:34:46,800 If you have any questions, comments, response to the questions. 2256 03:34:52,240 --> 03:34:53,400 Councilor Wright Arnold. 2257 03:34:55,060 --> 03:34:55,720 Thank you, Mayor. 2258 03:34:56,220 --> 03:34:58,580 And thank you, Allie, for the presentation. 2259 03:34:59,440 --> 03:34:59,980 You're always... 2260 03:35:00,000 --> 03:35:12,220 So good at presenting some very complex topics very easily. I want to make sure I understand some things I was confused at when I first read the memo. 2261 03:35:13,800 --> 03:35:23,660 When you're talking about the exchange ratios, that's separate from an independent from the additional height bonus for a different affordability. 2262 03:35:23,660 --> 03:35:33,020 That's just something that you're allowing to change the mix of affordable housing within the development. 2263 03:35:33,860 --> 03:35:37,540 And with those offered niligational height, is that how accurate? 2264 03:35:38,600 --> 03:35:41,800 Thank you, Virginia, to clarify, Council Member Arnold. 2265 03:35:42,680 --> 03:35:48,680 As it's written in the code that was attached to your packet, those exchange ratios were written in as an option, 2266 03:35:48,680 --> 03:35:54,680 only for the additional units that would be required for the additional height bonus. 2267 03:35:55,420 --> 03:36:01,540 Since we published your packet, staff is evolving that idea to potentially apply to all 2268 03:36:01,540 --> 03:36:03,140 of the affordable units required. 2269 03:36:03,620 --> 03:36:07,680 So that's what we would propose is making those exchange ratios available across the board 2270 03:36:07,680 --> 03:36:09,600 and would appreciate Council feedback on that. 2271 03:36:09,880 --> 03:36:11,980 Yeah, but I support that. 2272 03:36:12,100 --> 03:36:17,520 On the additional height bonus, that's an area where I didn't fully understand, have you 2273 03:36:17,520 --> 03:36:24,100 set, a standard of what you do to qualify for the additional tight bonus, or is that you ask 2274 03:36:24,100 --> 03:36:27,520 you feedback on the concept and the upper limits? 2275 03:36:29,080 --> 03:36:29,920 Thank you for the question. 2276 03:36:30,060 --> 03:36:33,080 We are looking for feedback on the concept. 2277 03:36:33,660 --> 03:36:37,940 We've been working in one of the points we're still coordinating on with arch is calibrating 2278 03:36:37,940 --> 03:36:38,800 with that requirement. 2279 03:36:39,520 --> 03:36:44,640 Our current thought is that we could do something like an additional 5% of affordable units, 2280 03:36:44,640 --> 03:36:47,340 might make it eligible for that additional height bonus. 2281 03:36:47,580 --> 03:36:49,560 If there's any upper limits that council members 2282 03:36:49,560 --> 03:36:51,720 felt strongly about, take care in that. 2283 03:36:52,000 --> 03:36:52,920 OK, great. 2284 03:36:53,400 --> 03:37:00,240 So to appreciate the answers to offer my feedback overall, 2285 03:37:00,800 --> 03:37:04,880 I really appreciate the model of zone equivalences 2286 03:37:04,880 --> 03:37:08,520 versus coming up with some new standards and specifying. 2287 03:37:08,540 --> 03:37:10,600 This is much simpler to understand. 2288 03:37:11,000 --> 03:37:12,280 I appreciate that. 2289 03:37:12,280 --> 03:37:14,440 I appreciate the focus on development by right 2290 03:37:14,440 --> 03:37:21,020 in the administrative approvals. I support what you're suggesting on allowing for the exchange 2291 03:37:21,020 --> 03:37:32,640 ratios through as part of the affordable housing and I support and not necessarily just as part 2292 03:37:32,640 --> 03:37:40,900 of a height bonus and I support the upper limits of the height bonuses that you're suggesting 2293 03:37:40,900 --> 03:37:47,620 and look forward to further discussion from the planning commission on what are the right 2294 03:37:47,620 --> 03:37:54,780 and arch on what are the right requirements to qualify for that. Thank you. 2295 03:37:54,860 --> 03:38:00,260 Thank you. Councillor Timchism. Thank you and thank you, Allison. 2296 03:38:02,900 --> 03:38:10,560 Where are the process are we on this? This was designed to comply with the state law, but does this 2297 03:38:10,560 --> 03:38:16,480 back to the planning commission now? Yes, so our next step would be to finalize the draft 2298 03:38:16,480 --> 03:38:23,040 code amendments and then take it to planning commission for a public hand. Okay, thank you. 2299 03:38:24,440 --> 03:38:32,240 I do agree with and support most of this. I think it is logical because 2300 03:38:33,160 --> 03:38:37,520 this would take into consideration the underlying zoning of the surrounding 2301 03:38:40,600 --> 03:38:43,540 name or hood or the surrounding location, right? 2302 03:38:44,480 --> 03:38:44,720 Yes. 2303 03:38:45,280 --> 03:38:46,320 Thank you. 2304 03:38:48,210 --> 03:38:48,730 Thank you. 2305 03:38:49,030 --> 03:38:49,630 Anybody else? 2306 03:38:53,860 --> 03:38:54,060 Oh. 2307 03:38:54,120 --> 03:38:55,180 Tell us where I felt come. 2308 03:38:55,560 --> 03:38:56,460 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 2309 03:38:57,220 --> 03:38:58,120 Nothing really new to add. 2310 03:38:58,280 --> 03:39:02,380 I just wanted to share that I support staff's recommendation. 2311 03:39:04,000 --> 03:39:10,440 And including the exchange ratios applying to all of the affordable housing requirements. 2312 03:39:10,440 --> 03:39:16,820 And I really appreciate not only its simplicity, but its responsiveness to the stakeholder engagement. 2313 03:39:17,340 --> 03:39:22,080 So, thank you for that, and I'm looking forward to hopefully adopting this in the near future. 2314 03:39:24,260 --> 03:39:24,640 Thank you. 2315 03:39:24,900 --> 03:39:25,440 Councillor Prim. 2316 03:39:26,260 --> 03:39:31,560 Hi, I just wanted to say that I agree with the overall plan here, 2317 03:39:31,860 --> 03:39:35,580 and don't have really anything to add, which is, which is rare. 2318 03:39:35,960 --> 03:39:36,620 Thank you. 2319 03:39:37,200 --> 03:39:37,660 Thank you. 2320 03:39:38,440 --> 03:39:40,420 Thank you. 2321 03:39:42,240 --> 03:39:45,980 Um, say, I think this is really well done. 2322 03:39:46,620 --> 03:39:53,420 I think that we've worked really hard to simplify the process as much as possible both in the zoning and 2323 03:39:53,420 --> 03:39:56,680 being able to hand hold and support the faith-based properties. 2324 03:39:57,320 --> 03:39:58,600 This is very thoughtful. 2325 03:40:00,000 --> 03:40:24,220 Yeah, it's great. So take it to public hearing. Oh, I did have one question. I appreciate that you brought on the faith-based property owners in to get their feedback. Did we, did that include this code? Did they look at this code? Recognizing that it's not usually, they don't read code usually, but did they have a chance to provide feedback on the code? 2326 03:40:25,140 --> 03:40:31,240 I don't believe that we've been any faith-based organization seen back directly on the code. 2327 03:40:31,340 --> 03:40:35,360 What we've heard a lot of is that they don't do this when they're not super familiar. 2328 03:40:35,940 --> 03:40:41,700 But we feel like we've gotten really constructive feedback from affordable housing developers that would be likely partners. 2329 03:40:43,140 --> 03:40:49,640 Okay, and when we, but let's do invite them to participate in the public hearing. 2330 03:40:50,240 --> 03:40:51,280 So, thank you. 2331 03:40:51,280 --> 03:40:59,400 Deputy Mayor. I think you met a mayor. Kind of related to that, Allison. 2332 03:41:01,440 --> 03:41:01,800 Making sure 2333 03:41:01,800 --> 03:41:07,300 that we're, I was going to ask the same question that Councilmember Arnold asked about the sort 2334 03:41:07,300 --> 03:41:18,860 of the mathematical bridge between the additional affordable housing units pursuant to the 2335 03:41:18,860 --> 03:41:24,720 So it sounds like we're going to be refining that and when we do, I think it would make 2336 03:41:24,720 --> 03:41:29,300 sense if we haven't already to get feedback from the development community that does 2337 03:41:29,300 --> 03:41:34,580 affordable housing development and make sure that what we're thinking about makes sense. 2338 03:41:34,880 --> 03:41:41,600 So if we're not doing that, let's suggest we do if you're already doing it great, obviously 2339 03:41:41,600 --> 03:41:44,880 we've got some work to do to figure out that mathematical bridge and I just want to make 2340 03:41:44,880 --> 03:41:51,280 it makes sense and that, you know, 15 additional feet makes sense and 20 additional feet makes 2341 03:41:51,280 --> 03:41:55,160 sense. Because sometimes we come up with those numbers, at least we as elected officials 2342 03:41:55,160 --> 03:42:00,840 do probably not use planning professionals. And once a developer gets a hold of those numbers, 2343 03:42:01,020 --> 03:42:05,300 they're like, mmm, that doesn't really do that much for us, so I want to make sure we 2344 03:42:05,300 --> 03:42:11,340 think that through. Yes, and Scott and his team do have a very direct line of communication on this 2345 03:42:11,340 --> 03:42:13,640 project with the Housing Development Consortium, 2346 03:42:13,700 --> 03:42:15,660 who represents several affordable housing developers. 2347 03:42:16,060 --> 03:42:18,340 So I think they've been great at providing feedback 2348 03:42:18,340 --> 03:42:21,040 and giving us good checks as we go along. 2349 03:42:21,380 --> 03:42:23,480 Great, thank you. 2350 03:42:23,540 --> 03:42:25,540 Thank you, anyone else? 2351 03:42:25,720 --> 03:42:27,680 All right, Allison, do you feel like you have what you need 2352 03:42:27,680 --> 03:42:28,480 from us? 2353 03:42:28,780 --> 03:42:29,820 I believe we have what we need. 2354 03:42:29,840 --> 03:42:30,660 Thank you for the feedback. 2355 03:42:31,480 --> 03:42:32,820 Great, thank you so much. 2356 03:42:33,880 --> 03:42:37,940 All right, we are going to move on to briefing 2357 03:42:37,940 --> 03:42:42,900 a potential affordable housing agreement related to the ROTA apartment city manager. 2358 03:42:45,880 --> 03:42:46,840 Okay, thank you very much. 2359 03:42:47,900 --> 03:42:52,260 This is a potential project to create some affordable housing in Brooklyn. 2360 03:42:52,440 --> 03:42:56,280 As we go on for several years, if we finally have to place that we want to check out 2361 03:42:56,280 --> 03:42:59,000 with the council to see if you want us to continue to a final agreement. 2362 03:43:01,060 --> 03:43:04,420 So, yeah, at a minus sign, our Director of Product Eubility is going to give the presentation. 2363 03:43:04,760 --> 03:43:08,000 We also have the owner of the project, ROTA apartments, 2364 03:43:08,000 --> 03:43:10,640 for our panelists here, as well as Angela Rosman, 2365 03:43:10,900 --> 03:43:13,560 up there to answer questions about the project 2366 03:43:13,560 --> 03:43:14,840 and the agreement as well. 2367 03:43:15,000 --> 03:43:18,040 So with that, I'll turn it over to Mr. Roycey. 2368 03:43:18,700 --> 03:43:20,620 All right, good evening. 2369 03:43:20,840 --> 03:43:22,480 Thanks, City Manager, good evening, Mayor. 2370 03:43:22,580 --> 03:43:24,280 Good evening, Deputy Mayor and Council. 2371 03:43:26,140 --> 03:43:29,240 Mr. City Manager mentioned yet, joined by several folks, 2372 03:43:29,680 --> 03:43:32,220 Don Nelson, our Planning Manager, Kevin Hansen, 2373 03:43:32,800 --> 03:43:36,640 or Senior Assistant City Attorney, who helped out with this analysis 2374 03:43:36,640 --> 03:43:50,060 And then Connor Hansen, the managing principal at SRM development, Angela Rosman, who's the director of sustainable development at natural and build environments, and then of course, Tom Robert Pantley, who's the CEO of natural and build environments. 2375 03:43:50,660 --> 03:43:56,160 And yeah, again, we're not looking for a decision tonight, just feedback on whether you want staff to continue working on this agreement. 2376 03:43:56,540 --> 03:44:01,560 And if you have any follow-up questions. And yeah, again, just six slides tonight. 2377 03:44:02,960 --> 03:44:05,520 Hopefully you can see an aerial photo here. 2378 03:44:07,160 --> 03:44:09,220 This is really just to provide some context. 2379 03:44:10,760 --> 03:44:18,880 And, you know, this is, I should mention this is a really extraordinary project that's been instrumental in being part of our affordable housing strategy in Kirkland. 2380 03:44:19,100 --> 03:44:20,700 So I just want to point that out. 2381 03:44:21,080 --> 03:44:24,120 RTA is a 290 unit apartment building as you all know. 2382 03:44:24,280 --> 03:44:25,460 It's right in the heart of downtown. 2383 03:44:26,000 --> 03:44:32,700 I'd also note that it's right next to the 111 unit Plaza Project and in response to an earlier 2384 03:44:32,700 --> 03:44:38,140 public comment, the Plaza Project was the project that was the subject of an MFT agreement 2385 03:44:38,140 --> 03:44:43,540 that was city negotiated, not the RIT project that we're talking about tonight. 2386 03:44:44,060 --> 03:44:48,540 So again, right in the middle of downtown, right across from Kirkland Urban, hugely walkable, 2387 03:44:48,960 --> 03:44:53,560 two grocery stores within a couple of minute walk. I think you know all those characteristics 2388 03:44:53,560 --> 03:44:59,980 of the setting of the 290 units at RITA 228 units or Ecoflats, meaning that 2389 03:45:00,000 --> 03:45:29,980 They have shared kitchens, although most have their own bathrooms. And this proposed deal that we're talking about tonight would encompass the affordability restrictions at 60% of the area median income, or AMI, on 218 of the ECO flat units, or 75% of the total units. And just to provide an illustration of what 60% AMI means in our community, it's about $60,000 per year for a household of one. So we're talking about, you know, pretty critical. 2390 03:45:30,000 --> 03:45:34,040 I'm pleased in our communities, so we're talking about postal employees 2391 03:45:34,040 --> 03:45:38,100 executive assistance, preschool teachers, entry-level transit workers 2392 03:45:38,100 --> 03:45:43,060 that need to have housing that's affordable at 60% am I. 2393 03:45:44,200 --> 03:45:48,120 So this is the slide you've seen this on on a 50 or 60 times over the last couple of years 2394 03:45:48,120 --> 03:45:55,100 and shows our housing needs through 244, 13,200 units across all income levels. 2395 03:45:55,520 --> 03:45:57,340 Now just point out a couple of things. 2396 03:45:57,340 --> 03:46:05,520 First, as you all know, the greatest need based on this chart is in the 50% and under range and that's about 2397 03:46:05,520 --> 03:46:09,540 10,440 units or about 80% of our need. 2398 03:46:10,420 --> 03:46:15,200 The need in the 51 to 80% range is still as much smaller, but it's still very significant. 2399 03:46:15,700 --> 03:46:21,240 It's about 1,022 units or 8% of our overall need. 2400 03:46:21,240 --> 03:46:28,260 And the 51% to 80% range is the bracket of income needed that would be addressed by this proposed deal. 2401 03:46:28,560 --> 03:46:31,940 So again, a really important part of our affordable housing strategy. 2402 03:46:34,330 --> 03:46:37,310 So just as a reminder, here are the key elements of the proposal. 2403 03:46:38,430 --> 03:46:47,710 Again, 218 of the eco flats at RTA, including all the units with shared bathrooms, would be set aside at 60% AMI. 2404 03:46:47,710 --> 03:46:52,990 Tent turnover has been an interest of Council on previous agreements. 2405 03:46:53,270 --> 03:47:00,770 So right now, according to the owner, a majority of the units are rented by tenants whose incomes are over 60% AMI. 2406 03:47:01,030 --> 03:47:09,730 And under the terms of the deal, these tenants could stay at RIT, but maybe relocated to not income restricted units in the building. 2407 03:47:10,770 --> 03:47:17,490 Regarding income growth, if a tenant makes more than 60% if a tenant who makes no more than 60% AMI moves, 2408 03:47:17,490 --> 03:47:21,170 to a unit, and then their income increases up to 80% 2409 03:47:21,170 --> 03:47:24,390 AMI, the units would still be considered affordable. 2410 03:47:26,290 --> 03:47:28,630 Regarding the eligibility for the tax exemption, 2411 03:47:29,230 --> 03:47:32,850 the property owner gets the tax break for at least 20 to 40 years, 2412 03:47:33,350 --> 03:47:37,170 as long as 75% of the units are rented to households, 2413 03:47:37,670 --> 03:47:42,530 making no more than 60% AMI with that limited income growth provision 2414 03:47:42,530 --> 03:47:46,870 that I just talked about, as I previously mentioned, 2415 03:47:48,430 --> 03:47:50,050 they were the eligible for the tax exemption. 2416 03:47:51,470 --> 03:47:54,830 Regarding the loan, to be eligible for the tax break, 2417 03:47:54,830 --> 03:47:58,030 besides meeting the affordability requirements, 2418 03:47:58,490 --> 03:48:02,450 the project has to receive financial public financial assistance 2419 03:48:02,450 --> 03:48:05,650 under the state law, and that's where the city comes in. 2420 03:48:06,030 --> 03:48:08,710 So the proposal is to give the owner a $500,000 2421 03:48:08,710 --> 03:48:15,490 dollars and no interest loan for up to 40 years. And then the monitoring plan would have 2422 03:48:15,490 --> 03:48:20,610 built-in procedures for ensuring the affordability provisions of the agreement are met, 2423 03:48:20,770 --> 03:48:25,950 and those would also likely be monitored by our colleagues at Arche. And then the last thing I 2424 03:48:25,950 --> 03:48:30,810 want to mention about the key elements of the proposal is that the project would be owned and operated 2425 03:48:30,810 --> 03:48:37,550 by a nonprofit that nonprofit is still to be determined. The current owner has a list of organizations 2426 03:48:37,550 --> 03:48:40,650 they will potentially negotiate with if the deal moves forward. 2427 03:48:44,080 --> 03:48:51,260 This slide, we put together in response to questions about the sort of implications of the tax break. 2428 03:48:52,120 --> 03:48:54,640 So, I just want to mention two things about the slide. 2429 03:48:54,840 --> 03:49:05,060 First is that the owner, the current owner of the project estimates the value of the tax break at about $502,000 per year. 2430 03:49:05,060 --> 03:49:09,860 And then there have been lots of questions about the impact to city homeowners of the tax break. 2431 03:49:10,500 --> 03:49:16,820 So using our internal tool, our finance department staff estimated that the city property taxes 2432 03:49:16,820 --> 03:49:23,100 that would be shifted to the owner of a median value home in Kirkland as a result of the tax break. 2433 03:49:23,400 --> 03:49:29,980 If it were to be approved would be about $1.25 a year and that's again for a median value home in Kirkland. 2434 03:49:29,980 --> 03:49:34,660 I would also note that that figure does not include shifted taxes and other taxing districts. 2435 03:49:34,660 --> 03:49:39,200 We're really just talking about the shifted taxes for city property tax. 2436 03:49:42,450 --> 03:49:44,270 And then this is the last slide. 2437 03:49:44,870 --> 03:49:48,330 These are the issues for council consideration that we flagged in the staff member. 2438 03:49:48,430 --> 03:49:53,410 I'll go through them relatively fast, but you're welcome to ask questions about them. 2439 03:49:54,190 --> 03:49:56,030 First is regarding income limits. 2440 03:49:56,030 --> 03:49:59,970 So, the project without the RK project with... 2441 03:50:00,000 --> 03:50:25,740 Without any covenant in place, just, you know, market rate rents already has a very high degree of affordability, with 89% of the eco-flatch renting for less than 60% AMI. I'd also note the affordability under this deal would be a key to region wide rents for studio units, which in many cases have complete kitchens and unit bathrooms, and so in some ways may be superior to these units. 2442 03:50:25,740 --> 03:50:32,200 So a key question is whether it is likely for rents to increase or decrease in these units over time and 2443 03:50:32,200 --> 03:50:37,940 then whether affordability level should be linked to something less than studio units. Again, these are just questions that we're posing. 2444 03:50:39,340 --> 03:50:45,420 Unit types, the agreement includes only eco flats and not one to three bedroom units. 2445 03:50:45,740 --> 03:50:54,240 And we note that one to three bedroom units, which are present in RTA, particularly the two and three bedroom units may be the most desirable units 2446 03:50:54,240 --> 03:50:57,000 and the ones that are most likely to undergo a future rent 2447 03:50:57,000 --> 03:50:59,660 escalation, although there might be a lot of value 2448 03:50:59,660 --> 03:51:02,920 in preserving the ego flats as well at affordable levels. 2449 03:51:03,460 --> 03:51:05,300 So the question is, should any of the more household 2450 03:51:05,300 --> 03:51:08,200 size units be included in the mix under the agreement? 2451 03:51:09,380 --> 03:51:11,920 Rent increases is another issue that we flagged. 2452 03:51:13,580 --> 03:51:16,060 So you probably know that these units 2453 03:51:16,060 --> 03:51:18,860 would not be subject to the recently past state authorized 2454 03:51:18,860 --> 03:51:20,420 rank control law. 2455 03:51:20,420 --> 03:51:30,340 And so they would fluctuate according to changes in area media and income, right there linked to AMI, similar to other arch managed units in the city. 2456 03:51:31,320 --> 03:51:39,500 So what happens is that if median income rises at a faster rate than individuals income that individuals living unit becomes less affordable. 2457 03:51:40,640 --> 03:51:45,200 And again, so we're talking about this issue in terms of individual experience versus aggregate experience. 2458 03:51:45,200 --> 03:51:48,300 And so the question is, should there be a cap on running 2459 03:51:48,300 --> 03:51:50,540 increases to reflect, you know, 2460 03:51:50,540 --> 03:51:52,920 potential escalation of median income in the region? 2461 03:51:53,940 --> 03:51:57,040 And then lastly, the loan and the terms of the agreement. 2462 03:51:57,260 --> 03:52:01,540 So we're talking again about a $500,000 loan as 0% interest. 2463 03:52:02,440 --> 03:52:04,120 And for a term of up to 40 years, 2464 03:52:04,300 --> 03:52:05,700 and I see that council member, Tinshazen, 2465 03:52:05,740 --> 03:52:07,720 has his hand up as well. 2466 03:52:08,000 --> 03:52:09,020 Yeah, it's very, Tinshazen. 2467 03:52:09,980 --> 03:52:10,840 Thank you, Adam. 2468 03:52:12,880 --> 03:52:19,280 So, my question is on the terms of the loan, I understand the value of this project and I'm generally supportive. 2469 03:52:20,840 --> 03:52:39,420 The loan terms are 0% interest. My question for staff is, why is it this loan at 6% interest or the prevailing rate or whatever a normal loan would be at from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or the federal government? 2470 03:52:39,420 --> 03:52:55,680 And I would note that 20 years of interest or 40 years of interest at 6%, would be maybe 350,000 over 20 years, or if the loan is over 40 years, you know, 800,000 or more. 2471 03:52:57,630 --> 03:53:01,750 And why are we for going that interest at some sort of a reasonable rate? 2472 03:53:06,120 --> 03:53:11,540 I could do an additional response to that. So that was one of the reasons we have the question. 2473 03:53:11,740 --> 03:53:16,940 I think the intent of the staff in the starting point was if we're trying to facilitate affordable housing, 2474 03:53:17,100 --> 03:53:21,340 we're trying to remove as many barriers as possible. So any cost that we'd be in the potting, 2475 03:53:22,200 --> 03:53:24,240 we would start off saying we shouldn't be doing that. 2476 03:53:25,740 --> 03:53:28,060 But when the project was first thought of, 2477 03:53:28,060 --> 03:53:32,660 what years ago, the attempt was that the amount of money was going to be a contribution not 2478 03:53:32,660 --> 03:53:37,960 long, so even that's better than I think the original idea which was, this would just be part 2479 03:53:37,960 --> 03:53:43,700 of our contribution to the stack of funding. So that's the primary reason we were just thinking 2480 03:53:43,700 --> 03:53:48,000 wanted to keep the impact as low as possible, but there's certainly no reason we couldn't have 2481 03:53:48,000 --> 03:53:52,180 a discussion on the property, I don't know about whether there should be an interest on the long. 2482 03:53:55,890 --> 03:53:59,230 Okay, I mean, I understand the reason to support this, 2483 03:54:02,130 --> 03:54:05,070 but I understand not having a high, 2484 03:54:05,070 --> 03:54:17,390 or exorbitantly high interest rate, but zero seems concerning, and I would ask that different options 2485 03:54:17,390 --> 03:54:23,130 be brought back at the prevailing rate or that that'd be investigated. Thank you. 2486 03:54:24,890 --> 03:54:30,670 Thank you. Great. Thanks. I don't have that much. Sorry. 2487 03:54:31,570 --> 03:54:36,530 No, I was going to tell you to go ahead. So you're good. Okay. I was going to mention, I don't have 2488 03:54:36,530 --> 03:54:43,430 that much more to add. So yeah, we already sort of got into the terms of the loan. The term is 2489 03:54:43,430 --> 03:54:49,250 40 years also is the only other thing that we flag and again the owner indicates that 2490 03:54:49,250 --> 03:54:52,930 all the terms of the agreement are necessary to secure financing for the project. 2491 03:54:53,810 --> 03:54:59,930 We would note that typical inclusionary zoning units and Kirkland's Market Rape Buildings are... 2492 03:55:00,000 --> 03:55:07,500 Usually affordable for the life of the project. So when you're thinking about the term of the loan and the term of the affordability might think about that as well. 2493 03:55:08,160 --> 03:55:21,440 And with that, I think that exhaust the issues for council consideration. We're happy to take more questions. And again, we're just looking for feedback on undertaking additional work on this agreement. And then, and you follow up questions that we can research further. 2494 03:55:24,640 --> 03:55:26,340 Okay, thank you. 2495 03:55:26,400 --> 03:55:28,700 No, no, no, no, no, no. 2496 03:55:30,600 --> 03:55:32,140 Oh, okay. 2497 03:55:33,500 --> 03:55:34,740 All right, council repassible. 2498 03:55:38,390 --> 03:55:39,430 Thank you. 2499 03:55:39,930 --> 03:55:40,890 A couple of questions. 2500 03:55:43,550 --> 03:55:48,690 So this, so I mean, you've been getting this development confused with the other one next 2501 03:55:48,690 --> 03:55:49,150 store. 2502 03:55:49,670 --> 03:55:52,910 So the other one had multi-panel intact exemption, and this one didn't. 2503 03:55:53,090 --> 03:55:54,770 Is that what you're seeing? 2504 03:55:55,070 --> 03:55:55,310 Correct. 2505 03:55:57,310 --> 03:56:25,010 And then on, I guess what I heard from the presentation was that the eco flats, you know, many of them currently read less than 60% AMI, it's just that there's no income restrictions on renting to folks that meet that today, right? 2506 03:56:25,010 --> 03:56:34,170 Yeah, that's right. I think 89% rent for less than 60% am I and again, they rent those low levels just by nature of the fact that they're very compact 2507 03:56:34,170 --> 03:56:37,950 And we're designed for affordability at market rates 2508 03:56:39,170 --> 03:56:43,730 What I guess what like market information do we have that that would say that 2509 03:56:44,650 --> 03:56:53,590 The that the current rents would exceed 60% am I you know in a future is it just kind of just mark back at that envelope 2510 03:56:53,590 --> 03:56:59,790 So, calculations or estimates, or is there more there to kind of substantiate that? 2511 03:57:00,610 --> 03:57:02,530 Yeah, that's something that we could look at further. 2512 03:57:02,570 --> 03:57:05,230 I don't think we have a lot of hard data on that at this point. 2513 03:57:05,470 --> 03:57:08,690 It's hard to predict what happens with rents in the future. 2514 03:57:09,050 --> 03:57:12,610 Oftentimes, as buildings age, the rents get cheaper. 2515 03:57:13,390 --> 03:57:18,030 But sometimes, especially when there's a constraint housing supply or a lot of economic growth, 2516 03:57:18,150 --> 03:57:19,130 the opposite can happen. 2517 03:57:20,230 --> 03:57:23,570 So, I don't think we have perfect hard data on that. 2518 03:57:23,570 --> 03:57:26,530 if you, right now, that's something we could look into further. 2519 03:57:27,790 --> 03:57:31,870 I'd be interested in just a little bit more focus on that. 2520 03:57:32,990 --> 03:57:38,770 I'd like to be assured that at least we gave it a good due diligence. 2521 03:57:41,050 --> 03:57:41,930 Thank you. 2522 03:57:43,410 --> 03:57:44,290 Thank you. 2523 03:57:44,430 --> 03:57:44,650 Andrew? 2524 03:57:47,570 --> 03:57:49,950 Yeah, I was just, I was, I think, well, definitely. 2525 03:57:50,070 --> 03:57:52,170 I see what we can figure out on that. 2526 03:57:52,170 --> 03:57:54,530 I think I'm certainly going to talk with the developers 2527 03:57:54,530 --> 03:57:56,270 as well and others to get some insight. 2528 03:57:57,370 --> 03:57:58,690 I think, and proposing those to you, 2529 03:57:58,730 --> 03:58:00,470 I was also looking at the other side of the client, 2530 03:58:00,750 --> 03:58:05,130 which is how likely are more people to become low income? 2531 03:58:05,810 --> 03:58:08,070 And that's, I think, one of the challenges that we're seeing. 2532 03:58:08,230 --> 03:58:10,610 We had our discussion of the utility rate earlier, right? 2533 03:58:10,830 --> 03:58:13,910 That there's also, is the need increasing 2534 03:58:13,910 --> 03:58:15,350 for dedicated affordable housing. 2535 03:58:15,650 --> 03:58:17,950 So I think those are the two factors you want to weigh, 2536 03:58:18,470 --> 03:58:20,070 what is what it's like to have with rents 2537 03:58:20,070 --> 03:58:22,370 to us, what's likely to happen with it? 2538 03:58:29,590 --> 03:58:30,490 Yeah, that's a lot of work. 2539 03:58:31,750 --> 03:58:32,730 Thank you. 2540 03:58:33,450 --> 03:58:36,030 To catch members of our past close question, 2541 03:58:36,530 --> 03:58:42,050 I am wondering, it's not just the rent of this. 2542 03:58:42,330 --> 03:58:45,390 It's the risk of losing these affordable units. 2543 03:58:45,590 --> 03:58:49,130 And I see that we have Robert Panley 2544 03:58:49,130 --> 03:58:52,210 and Angela Rosmanov, sustainable Kirkland here. 2545 03:58:52,290 --> 03:58:55,190 I'm wondering if they are able to share 2546 03:58:55,190 --> 03:59:09,190 Um, like from what they have had is what's what's the interest in any alternatives that they have had for this property that, um, to compare to compared to this, to the eco flats. 2547 03:59:09,830 --> 03:59:15,070 If they're prepared to describe it, if not, um, that is one, too. 2548 03:59:26,100 --> 03:59:29,400 Thank Robert has his hand raised mayor. 2549 03:59:33,200 --> 03:59:40,320 I think she is. 2550 03:59:40,360 --> 03:59:44,220 If you want to take over for a second. 2551 03:59:44,760 --> 03:59:45,040 Sure. 2552 03:59:45,980 --> 03:59:46,620 So Mr. Bailey? 2553 03:59:47,740 --> 03:59:49,600 Thank you very much council. 2554 03:59:50,860 --> 03:59:55,320 And I would like to give some response to the comments already 2555 03:59:55,770 --> 03:59:57,920 because we all want affordability. 2556 03:59:57,920 --> 03:59:59,960 and we want the best before 2557 04:00:00,000 --> 04:00:29,900 What a ability that we can occur, and what started this whole process was we went to sell the property, and we got multiple offers at which and it has continued over the last couple years, where people want to do value add to this property, and their job to do value add is to push rents up, and personally it's scared me to death, because that's not been our mission. 2558 04:00:30,000 --> 04:00:36,460 And when we first built this, the president of the of the bank that gave us the construction 2559 04:00:36,460 --> 04:00:43,860 financing, he said, you know, be a lot better if you just build all the luxuries economically 2560 04:00:44,520 --> 04:00:50,160 and because they did a lot of this and I said, I know that, but that's not our mission. 2561 04:00:50,940 --> 04:00:59,020 So our goal here is to maintain the mission and what happened is when we built RTA, the 2562 04:00:59,020 --> 04:01:02,200 families, eyes were up here, and all of our rents were below. 2563 04:01:03,120 --> 04:01:09,320 And what's happened has, we've broken through, we've done the start of a crossover. 2564 04:01:10,300 --> 04:01:17,260 And the crossover means that the rents are increasing the cost pressures are unbelievable 2565 04:01:17,980 --> 04:01:26,880 from insurance to real estate taxes to wages, and the rents have pushed, began to push over 2566 04:01:26,880 --> 04:01:37,660 the AMI 60% and then so that's what motivated this. I figured out that I'm not getting any younger 2567 04:01:37,660 --> 04:01:43,840 and my doctor says I'm biologically ten years younger than my chronological age and I still check 2568 04:01:43,840 --> 04:01:52,280 them still getting older and so we're moving to make a sale and we believe the best thing that we 2569 04:01:52,280 --> 04:01:54,400 can do for our city is to put on a covenant. 2570 04:01:55,240 --> 04:01:59,200 That said, we have underlying loans 2571 04:01:59,200 --> 04:02:01,740 that we have to get approval for. 2572 04:02:01,920 --> 04:02:05,340 So anything we agree to has to achieve 2573 04:02:05,340 --> 04:02:07,880 phantom A's approval, or will be in loan default. 2574 04:02:09,000 --> 04:02:11,600 And it's very, we've got a lot of homework, 2575 04:02:11,940 --> 04:02:13,980 and we think we're ahead in the right direction, 2576 04:02:14,580 --> 04:02:17,320 but it is an ongoing challenge. 2577 04:02:17,640 --> 04:02:21,180 I've never seen the financial markets so challenging 2578 04:02:21,180 --> 04:02:27,780 in my career as we are right now and I based on the federal level I'm not confident it's 2579 04:02:27,780 --> 04:02:35,800 not going to continue. So I think we're in for a long road here. The goal though is why do we 2580 04:02:35,800 --> 04:02:44,260 also think that rents will increase? Well since 2020 from 2022 in the city of Kirkland 2581 04:02:45,100 --> 04:02:48,340 Incums increased to 117%. 2582 04:02:48,340 --> 04:02:52,520 Rents have increased to 165%. 2583 04:02:52,520 --> 04:02:54,840 And the hardest hit our lowest incomes. 2584 04:02:56,040 --> 04:03:01,640 So I would hope that we would really do something special 2585 04:03:01,640 --> 04:03:03,140 to protect our lower incomes. 2586 04:03:03,680 --> 04:03:06,200 The other thing that the covenant does to be clear, 2587 04:03:06,280 --> 04:03:08,580 and I think it was briefly mentioned 2588 04:03:08,580 --> 04:03:11,100 by Council Member Pascal. 2589 04:03:11,100 --> 04:03:20,240 but right now and I think applying director also said it right now slightly over half of our units are 2590 04:03:20,240 --> 04:03:29,720 rented by people over 60%. What this transition will do is get everybody in the 50% to be able 2591 04:03:29,720 --> 04:03:35,380 to rent instead of some of our folks make a hundred and hundred and twenty thousand. They like the units 2592 04:03:35,380 --> 04:03:41,740 to, you know, that they're very convenient and cost-effective and we have a capacity problem. 2593 04:03:42,680 --> 04:03:50,060 We ended up 97% full as of at the end of July, which means that only difference really 2594 04:03:50,060 --> 04:03:56,300 is our ability to turn units because we have so many units from our perspective were overfold. 2595 04:03:56,980 --> 04:04:04,600 So it does solve a real big problem and it really will support our local businesses which means 2596 04:04:04,600 --> 04:04:10,140 that the restaurant owners, the reception at the medical center, 2597 04:04:11,040 --> 04:04:15,000 the postal service for people that Adam talked about. 2598 04:04:15,120 --> 04:04:20,580 These are real people, and the more we can keep our local employees 2599 04:04:20,580 --> 04:04:24,440 living downtown, they're not parking on the street now, 2600 04:04:25,520 --> 04:04:30,200 and they're part of our community, and we believe it's, 2601 04:04:30,200 --> 04:04:34,020 and I know the council does too, it's really the best answer. 2602 04:04:34,020 --> 04:04:41,940 So hopefully I answered some of those questions for you, but we are very concerned with the crossover effect, 2603 04:04:41,940 --> 04:04:51,280 meaning that the rencer already started over versus what we had when we first got approval in 2013. 2604 04:04:51,360 --> 04:04:59,280 Another thing is Seattle in 2013 was the 27th most expensive market in the nation-large city area. 2605 04:04:59,280 --> 04:04:59,980 with 2606 04:05:00,000 --> 04:05:08,300 We are now number six. So that's another example of where rents are just pushing through over the, over the line. Thank you very much. 2607 04:05:09,560 --> 04:05:11,740 Okay, thank you for that answer to my question. 2608 04:05:13,640 --> 04:05:21,160 The, just over all my comments and answers to the staff questions first. 2609 04:05:21,640 --> 04:05:25,980 I really appreciate the work of Mr. Patley and Sustainable Kirkland. 2610 04:05:25,980 --> 04:05:31,880 artes innovative and award-winning approach provided to eco-flats that are affordable to 2611 04:05:31,880 --> 04:05:38,480 renters at 60% AMI without subsidy. I was on the planning commission when this concept first 2612 04:05:38,480 --> 04:05:44,940 moved forward and the original zoning made this possible with parking flexibility. Moving forward, 2613 04:05:45,040 --> 04:05:53,700 there is the risk of these rents going up or even reconfiguring units to market rate housing. 2614 04:05:53,700 --> 04:05:59,860 The city and sustainable Kirkland has worked over several years to try to prevent this. 2615 04:06:00,260 --> 04:06:03,540 There were proposals that came before previous councils. 2616 04:06:03,940 --> 04:06:09,320 Some of the public comment that we've gotten in the email we've gotten had asked about using Amazon 2617 04:06:09,320 --> 04:06:14,500 and Microsoft Housing Fund instead of public public funding. 2618 04:06:14,920 --> 04:06:17,880 That was part of something Council looked like a year ago. 2619 04:06:17,880 --> 04:06:24,020 and even with, it felt through because those fund priorities were other housing types, but even 2620 04:06:24,020 --> 04:06:31,240 when they were looking at this, some public participation was required. Given our growth targets, 2621 04:06:32,640 --> 04:06:40,740 if these units converted to market rate, we would still have to make up for the loss for affordable units. 2622 04:06:40,740 --> 04:06:52,720 And for our $500,000 investment, we're preserving 211 units at 60% AMI for 20 to 40 years. 2623 04:06:53,100 --> 04:07:00,760 That's about $2,293 per unit, to Councilmember Tim Chesons' point. 2624 04:07:01,520 --> 04:07:04,480 On interest, I would support this even if it was a grant. 2625 04:07:04,480 --> 04:07:10,480 So I support this as your interest long because we're getting some clear public benefit. 2626 04:07:11,120 --> 04:07:16,100 To some of the issues for council consideration, my priority is scale. 2627 04:07:16,440 --> 04:07:22,520 So I support the focus on eco flats versus other types of units. 2628 04:07:23,360 --> 04:07:31,100 On rent increases, we note in the presentation and the packet that because these are affordable units, 2629 04:07:31,100 --> 04:07:35,820 the tenant protections in House Bill 1270 don't apply, 2630 04:07:40,560 --> 04:07:43,000 but in rent is linked to AMI. 2631 04:07:43,220 --> 04:07:47,280 What we've seen rent spikes when AMI has spiked. 2632 04:07:47,980 --> 04:07:52,560 So if this wasn't something that was a showstopper for federal project financing, 2633 04:07:52,920 --> 04:07:59,580 I'd like to see staff explore the protections that are in House Bill 1270, 2634 04:07:59,580 --> 04:08:09,440 perhaps something along the lines of limiting increases to increase an AMI, or the 2635 04:08:09,440 --> 04:08:15,000 hospital 2017 requirements, whatever's lower, that would be my suggestion, but would 2636 04:08:15,000 --> 04:08:23,560 like to explore something like that. Beyond that, and totally supportive of moving forward 2637 04:08:23,560 --> 04:08:30,240 with this and appreciate the developers and team moving this forward. 2638 04:08:30,680 --> 04:08:31,360 Thank you. 2639 04:08:35,390 --> 04:08:36,050 Thank you. 2640 04:08:36,090 --> 04:08:36,810 Councillor or Pasco? 2641 04:08:39,420 --> 04:08:44,760 Yeah, I just had a couple of questions after listening to Robert as the thanks for coming 2642 04:08:44,760 --> 04:08:45,740 tonight. 2643 04:08:46,380 --> 04:08:48,960 Robert and Angela appreciate it. 2644 04:08:49,140 --> 04:08:49,740 A question. 2645 04:08:51,160 --> 04:08:53,700 You know, one of the bullets up here is the unit types. 2646 04:08:53,720 --> 04:08:56,640 Number one to three bedroom units. 2647 04:08:56,640 --> 04:09:06,220 are arch included. Could you talk a little bit more about that and what, what, how would 2648 04:09:06,220 --> 04:09:12,080 the deal need to change to include those? 2649 04:09:19,480 --> 04:09:20,380 Did I do that right? 2650 04:09:21,660 --> 04:09:22,340 Yes, go ahead. 2651 04:09:22,380 --> 04:09:30,600 There you go. Okay. I want to make sure I'm supposed to speak. Okay. I would love to include 2652 04:09:30,600 --> 04:09:38,580 one to three bedroom units. If we did this at this point, I can tell you that the 2653 04:09:38,580 --> 04:09:42,540 underwriters for our loan would just turn it down flat because we've already asked the question 2654 04:09:42,540 --> 04:09:51,420 what can we do? It would require a reduction of the loan amounts and this many units to make that work 2655 04:09:51,420 --> 04:09:59,100 Amazon for 97 units put up 22 million in Kirkland a year ago or so. You're probably looking at the 2656 04:09:59,100 --> 04:09:59,780 the same ratio. 2657 04:10:00,000 --> 04:10:09,640 So, you know, approximately, it would take about $14 million from Amazon to make that work. That's an approximate. 2658 04:10:11,080 --> 04:10:15,920 Or the city, obviously the city could say, that's fine. We want to do it. 2659 04:10:16,120 --> 04:10:26,860 There might be an opportunity when we get this in place. If there's any way we can get there in any form, people here know me. 2660 04:10:26,860 --> 04:10:29,460 I will do everything I can to make it happen. 2661 04:10:30,080 --> 04:10:34,300 Even if we can find three or four or seven units, 2662 04:10:34,940 --> 04:10:37,140 we'll fall all over ourselves to make it happen. 2663 04:10:39,600 --> 04:10:40,740 Okay, thank you. 2664 04:10:43,860 --> 04:10:45,640 So, who's next? 2665 04:10:46,220 --> 04:10:46,980 Deputy Mayor. 2666 04:10:49,790 --> 04:10:50,610 Thank you, Mayor. 2667 04:10:53,170 --> 04:10:54,370 Yeah, thank you for this conversation. 2668 04:10:55,050 --> 04:10:58,750 Thank you, sustainable Kirkland, Mr. Pantley. 2669 04:10:58,830 --> 04:11:02,770 Thank you for the work you've done in our community to help us 2670 04:11:02,770 --> 04:11:12,130 the greater mix of housing types that we need. Some of which like the Eagle Flats can be naturally occurring 2671 04:11:12,130 --> 04:11:16,950 affordable housing as we've seen. So, really to appreciate your work. 2672 04:11:19,290 --> 04:11:21,380 I do have a couple of things. 2673 04:11:23,690 --> 04:11:30,550 I want to sort of highlight for staff. I support us moving forward this. I appreciate 2674 04:11:33,270 --> 04:11:42,650 I appreciate the value of this project or this idea, the idea of preserving units of naturally 2675 04:11:42,650 --> 04:11:50,670 current affordable housing, having them now be applicants be sort of means tested in that they 2676 04:11:50,670 --> 04:11:52,690 will have to meet the low income requirements, 2677 04:11:54,970 --> 04:11:59,590 the cost of this $500,000 versus the cost of 2678 04:12:00,410 --> 04:12:03,470 constructing new units or renovating new units. 2679 04:12:04,790 --> 04:12:07,470 We know that constructing new units is one unit. 2680 04:12:07,830 --> 04:12:10,470 This is roughly $600,000 in our current market, 2681 04:12:11,370 --> 04:12:17,750 and we're getting the 218 preserved units for less than that. 2682 04:12:18,910 --> 04:12:20,730 I appreciate all that. 2683 04:12:21,090 --> 04:12:25,050 At the same time, I know I have a cognizant of my responsibility 2684 04:12:25,050 --> 04:12:31,950 to current technical taxpayers and the opportunity to cost associated with spending this money on 2685 04:12:31,950 --> 04:12:39,150 this project and not others. So I do want to provide my feedback to staff. There are a couple 2686 04:12:39,150 --> 04:12:45,210 of their really sort of three areas. I really do want us to explore in the negotiations. 2687 04:12:47,890 --> 04:12:54,830 I would like us to sort of stress test. I appreciate Mr. Pantley's response to the idea 2688 04:12:55,050 --> 04:12:57,870 of some of the one, two, and three-bedroom units, 2689 04:12:58,430 --> 04:13:02,210 if it's possible if they could be part of the mix 2690 04:13:02,210 --> 04:13:03,910 of affordable units. 2691 04:13:04,930 --> 04:13:07,570 I'd like to explore that a little bit further. 2692 04:13:08,490 --> 04:13:11,030 Maybe there's a little bit of mixing and matching 2693 04:13:11,030 --> 04:13:16,370 that can be done to get just a few family-sized units 2694 04:13:18,450 --> 04:13:23,010 included if maybe some number of equal of the 218 2695 04:13:23,010 --> 04:13:24,410 equal flats are not included. 2696 04:13:24,410 --> 04:13:27,710 I don't know, but I'd like to explore that idea further. 2697 04:13:30,770 --> 04:13:37,230 I would also like to explore as a little bit further the length of the affordability commitment. 2698 04:13:38,090 --> 04:13:42,530 So when we're having further conversations, as we proceed with this proposal, 2699 04:13:44,410 --> 04:13:52,690 you know, typically affordable projects in Kirkland, it's for the life of the project, the affordability. 2700 04:13:53,430 --> 04:13:58,950 I understand that's not part of the current proposal, I'd like to explore that just further 2701 04:13:58,950 --> 04:14:06,190 to find out if there's anything that's workable for a longer term commitment there. 2702 04:14:06,390 --> 04:14:11,730 And then the last topic or the last sort of element that I'd like to the staff explore, 2703 04:14:11,850 --> 04:14:19,770 and these are just sort of the top three, but there is a real annual tax benefit to the property 2704 04:14:19,770 --> 04:14:31,270 owner from the tax benefit, it does seem to me that there might be the way to have the city 2705 04:14:31,270 --> 04:14:35,910 and ultimately the taxpayers paid back on a slightly quicker schedule. 2706 04:14:36,610 --> 04:14:39,230 So I would like to explore the payment terms a little bit. 2707 04:14:41,530 --> 04:14:48,690 I'm not as concerned about the interest rate on the loan, I'm okay with the idea of a 2708 04:14:48,690 --> 04:14:55,250 of a no interest loan, but maybe there's a repayment schedule given the tax benefits that 2709 04:14:55,250 --> 04:14:59,970 are annual, that a percentage of those tax benefits could come back. 2710 04:15:00,000 --> 04:15:07,320 To the city and repay the loan a little bit faster than just a final balloon payment of $500,000 at the end of 20 years. 2711 04:15:08,140 --> 04:15:09,680 I'd like to explore that little further. 2712 04:15:11,400 --> 04:15:20,800 And the lieu of interest rates, you know, there would be, if there was a repayment schedule, then there would be financial charges, if payments were late, to sort of just incentivize timely payment. 2713 04:15:21,360 --> 04:15:25,640 So that would be one way to sort of capture, recapture some of the value, the time value. 2714 04:15:25,640 --> 04:15:33,480 It payments aren't made timely. I'm not expecting that they won't be but you always have to account for that, so 2715 04:15:34,360 --> 04:15:37,860 Unless staff has any questions about my ideas there 2716 04:15:39,660 --> 04:15:46,880 I will I'll hand it the I'll hand it back. Okay. I see it thumb raised from City Manager. So thank you. Thank you 2717 04:15:48,240 --> 04:15:51,140 Councilman Phil Cohen council reprim. We haven't heard from you yet 2718 04:15:52,700 --> 04:15:54,820 Councilman. Well, there you go. Councilman Philcomb 2719 04:15:55,740 --> 04:16:00,960 Thank you, Madam Mayor. I was intently listening to the conversation so that I would have 2720 04:16:00,960 --> 04:16:05,580 things to respond to and to see if, you know, as we've been to share my thoughts on the 2721 04:16:05,580 --> 04:16:11,340 great ideas from coming from my fellow council members. Well first, thank you, Mr. Pantley, 2722 04:16:11,460 --> 04:16:17,560 Ms. Rosman and all the partners involved in it for bringing this to us. You know, we heard from 2723 04:16:17,560 --> 04:16:23,080 the community loud and clear during the comprehensive plan process that they want us to prioritize 2724 04:16:23,080 --> 04:16:28,320 preserving affordable housing. And to me, this is just a no-brainer. It's a great 2725 04:16:28,320 --> 04:16:33,620 opportunity that you're presenting to us to be able to preserve hundreds of units 2726 04:16:33,620 --> 04:16:40,000 of affordable housing in our city. And in such a prime location in downtown Kirkland, 2727 04:16:40,300 --> 04:16:47,160 a lot of the work coming out of 1220, you know, in the comprehensive plan was really not just 2728 04:16:47,160 --> 04:16:51,900 about the number of affordable units that we talk about, but also the quality of life 2729 04:16:51,900 --> 04:16:58,020 of any amenities in close proximity to the affordable housing that we work on here in the 2730 04:16:58,020 --> 04:17:04,500 public city of Kirkland. And so that's a big factor here, too. This is a prime location 2731 04:17:04,500 --> 04:17:10,500 for affordable housing that folks have access to the library to transit to, you know, restaurants 2732 04:17:10,500 --> 04:17:21,400 and parks. So thank you for that. I do have some thoughts on some of the proposed policy 2733 04:17:21,400 --> 04:17:35,640 considerations, but first I have a question on one of them to Mr. Pantley or Mr. Rosman about the idea of exploring an additional length of the commitment on affordable housing. 2734 04:17:36,200 --> 04:17:48,200 Can you speak to the feasibility of that, the potential impact on the underwriting or other considerations? I just want to hear your thoughts on that before I share my thoughts. 2735 04:17:48,900 --> 04:17:57,100 So, um, I would love to extend, um, and what we will do is we will go back to our 2736 04:17:57,100 --> 04:18:04,080 Fannie Mae representative and tell them what we want to do, but I would love to, my 2737 04:18:04,080 --> 04:18:10,480 thought is the, like tack, um, standard is 55 years in the state of Washington. 2738 04:18:11,240 --> 04:18:16,720 So, it seems like they've done enough financing, so that is going to be our request. 2739 04:18:16,720 --> 04:18:24,240 can we extend without a penalty of the underwriting and it gets, and I think it should work, 2740 04:18:24,940 --> 04:18:29,760 but we started with this process when we started with our first time around, 2741 04:18:30,360 --> 04:18:36,880 and we've talked to a lot of nonprofits and even the non-profits, national firms, 2742 04:18:37,120 --> 04:18:46,700 and billions of dollars in real estate, I'm shocked at how sensitive they are to these kinds of 2743 04:18:46,700 --> 04:18:54,820 able to finance out the term of the second buyer. It isn't about just getting it done now. 2744 04:18:55,100 --> 04:19:00,840 It's what happens. Excuse me, like a light tech term is 15 years and by the time we're all 2745 04:19:00,840 --> 04:19:08,780 done, it's 17 or 18 years. What does this next buyer look for? But you have my absolute commitment, 2746 04:19:08,780 --> 04:19:14,720 we'll collaborate with the city staff and we're very hard to make that happen. I would 2747 04:19:14,720 --> 04:19:18,360 No one would be happier than I am to see that extended. 2748 04:19:19,160 --> 04:19:20,740 Great, thank you. That's really helpful. 2749 04:19:21,300 --> 04:19:24,660 I mean, my lens on this is that I have like two goals here. 2750 04:19:24,980 --> 04:19:31,640 One, I want to make sure we get the largest community benefit that would actually be helpful to community members. 2751 04:19:32,020 --> 04:19:38,120 Most in need and two that we don't kill the deal by any changes that we want to see, right? 2752 04:19:38,300 --> 04:19:43,640 I want to make sure this goes through and that we don't over-squeeze to try to get so much out of it 2753 04:19:43,640 --> 04:19:46,780 that's some potential partners walk away from the table, right? 2754 04:19:46,880 --> 04:19:50,660 So those are kind of my two check marks 2755 04:19:50,660 --> 04:19:54,700 that I want to make sure any of these proposed guidance 2756 04:19:54,700 --> 04:19:58,620 that we give to staff to negotiate with you in the team 2757 04:19:59,180 --> 04:19:59,980 that we check both. 2758 04:20:00,000 --> 04:20:19,660 So, I am supportive of Councilmember Arnold's idea of mirroring the cap on rent increases into Houseville, 1217. I think that's a great idea and I would like to see that for obvious reasons, because as long as that doesn't kill the deal, I think that was certainly provided better community benefit. 2759 04:20:20,160 --> 04:20:40,140 So I do support that. I also support asking for an additional length of commitment on affordability if that's something, again, that's not going to kill the deal. So if it sounds like you're comfortable at least with the ask, if it's not going to, you know, offend enough for folks to walk away or at least decrease their trust in the negotiations. 2760 04:20:40,140 --> 04:20:51,820 that I would support that, but I trust the judgment of staff and you mistakenly having that conversation around what's appropriate there. 2761 04:20:52,480 --> 04:21:01,360 For those same reasons, I don't support messing with either like adding interest on the loan or having earlier payments on the loan. 2762 04:21:01,360 --> 04:21:07,160 Just like Councilman Ernl said, I was all in on this and thought it was a huge, you know, return 2763 04:21:07,160 --> 04:21:12,580 on investment for a relatively, the grand scheme of things, relatively small, smaller investment 2764 04:21:12,580 --> 04:21:17,240 compared to the value of the project and the value of the return of just having it be a grant. 2765 04:21:17,900 --> 04:21:22,320 Right? So even being alone is fine with me. I don't support any interest or any earlier payment on that, 2766 04:21:22,520 --> 04:21:26,720 and I would even be fine in going back to a grant if that was necessary to get some of the other 2767 04:21:26,720 --> 04:21:30,900 terms that we want. As I don't know if that's even something that would be attractive as an 2768 04:21:30,900 --> 04:21:36,860 negotiating token, but that is something that I would be happy to support if it could get us 2769 04:21:36,860 --> 04:21:42,280 some of the other things that we're looking for. For the same reason, because of your response 2770 04:21:42,280 --> 04:21:47,200 to the two or three bedroom, I don't support going back to the table on the larger units. 2771 04:21:47,660 --> 04:21:51,760 Given that we've already done that, I want to make sure that they know that they've already been 2772 04:21:51,760 --> 04:21:57,680 on that, right? I'm trusting that we've already asked that. And then that's not feasible. 2773 04:22:02,040 --> 04:22:05,640 I just want to make sure I responded to all of them. So I think there's some great ideas 2774 04:22:05,640 --> 04:22:10,560 discussing. Those are the ones I do and don't support. And again, I think this is a no-brainer. 2775 04:22:10,900 --> 04:22:16,060 And this is exactly what the community is asking for for us to preserve these types of units. 2776 04:22:16,760 --> 04:22:18,620 So thank you again for bringing forth the opportunity. 2777 04:22:20,060 --> 04:22:20,920 Thank you. 2778 04:22:21,220 --> 04:22:21,660 Councilor Crem. 2779 04:22:23,100 --> 04:22:23,400 All right. 2780 04:22:25,160 --> 04:22:29,540 So first I just want to recognize and really thank you all and everyone involved in bringing 2781 04:22:29,540 --> 04:22:31,640 this proposal forward to us. 2782 04:22:31,860 --> 04:22:37,660 I genuinely respect the goal of preserving affordability and I appreciate the effort to find really 2783 04:22:37,660 --> 04:22:41,980 creative ways to keep these units accessible to lower income residents. 2784 04:22:41,980 --> 04:22:49,140 I've seen the units myself, and was thoroughly impressed by the creativity of the design of the units, 2785 04:22:50,200 --> 04:22:55,440 and completely understand why you have such a low vacancy rate right now across the board. 2786 04:22:56,260 --> 04:23:04,720 So I thank you for also for thinking of potentially implementing a covenant to keep these units affordable for the long run. 2787 04:23:04,720 --> 04:23:33,120 I haven't said that. I still do have some questions as to whether this agreement is necessary, given the characteristics of this particular property, so I want to understand that a little bit more. I would I would like to get some more information on exactly what the risk is that a future owner would come in and suddenly convert these units into high priced market rate apartments. 2788 04:23:33,120 --> 04:23:43,380 I think like if the ultimate goal is to keep the rents low so that individuals that are below the 60% 2789 04:23:43,380 --> 04:23:50,340 AMI are able to afford it, I just want to understand if a new owner comes in, what is the real likelihood 2790 04:23:50,340 --> 04:23:57,460 and what are we basing that likelihood on to say that the rents will dramatically increase? 2791 04:23:57,460 --> 04:24:01,060 So maybe some more information on that would be really helpful. 2792 04:24:02,160 --> 04:24:04,740 I am overall supportive of this idea, 2793 04:24:05,860 --> 04:24:13,520 but I do think that information plus maybe potential other options in terms of the loan term. 2794 04:24:14,940 --> 04:24:20,260 And in terms of interest rate, I don't think I favor that too much, 2795 04:24:20,600 --> 04:24:27,440 but I do think maybe the term duration and the various options there would be helpful. 2796 04:24:27,440 --> 04:24:28,700 information. 2797 04:24:31,980 --> 04:24:33,540 Thank you. Anyone else? 2798 04:24:36,020 --> 04:24:37,980 All right. I am also 2799 04:24:37,980 --> 04:24:41,340 want to thank you both for bringing this and we've been good 2800 04:24:41,340 --> 04:24:46,160 partners with the city. One of a couple things I'm hearing from 2801 04:24:46,160 --> 04:24:52,620 the council members. I do support looking at an earlier payment option 2802 04:24:52,620 --> 04:24:59,320 if it can happen and again any payment that we get we can reinvest in 2803 04:24:59,320 --> 04:24:59,960 other project. 2804 04:25:00,000 --> 04:25:14,960 And I did appreciate our deputy mayor's idea of swapping some larger units for some eco-flex, because we do know that we have a need for larger units within the city. 2805 04:25:15,240 --> 04:25:27,160 So I would like to explore those two. My comment or my question is really to the city manager in that we haven't talked about where this 500,000 is going to come from. 2806 04:25:27,160 --> 04:25:35,660 And so, how would we fund the 500,000 and is there an opportunity cost to that so can you address that, please? 2807 04:25:37,720 --> 04:25:37,900 Yeah. 2808 04:25:38,360 --> 04:25:45,660 The goodness is this one has already been sent aside and an affordable housing account for middle-state 2809 04:25:45,660 --> 04:25:46,260 exercise tax. 2810 04:25:46,340 --> 04:25:49,860 So this is a couple of years ago and the previous budget carried it forward. 2811 04:25:50,260 --> 04:25:51,640 So it's already there. 2812 04:25:51,640 --> 04:25:57,560 It was originally set aside when the legislature gave cities the ability to use real 2813 04:25:57,560 --> 04:26:01,100 cynicized tax for affordable housing, they originally did it with a sunset provision 2814 04:26:01,100 --> 04:26:04,880 and Kirkknows one of the few cities that actually tried to use it for affordable housing, 2815 04:26:04,880 --> 04:26:07,240 so that was one of the impetus of us sitting in a society. 2816 04:26:08,160 --> 04:26:11,940 And we also wanted to demonstrate to the legislature that we would use it. 2817 04:26:12,100 --> 04:26:16,980 Thanks to Kirkknows advocacy and other cities, we actually were able to get that cap removed, 2818 04:26:17,020 --> 04:26:21,260 so it never did something so now any city can use real cynicized tax for affordable housing. 2819 04:26:21,260 --> 04:26:27,700 going forward. That's a good news. But why is already have it? It's fully budgeted and it's already there. 2820 04:26:28,320 --> 04:26:33,080 So. And how much is in that account? Right now, just the 500,000. 2821 04:26:33,100 --> 04:26:40,480 That's the 500,000. And again, I'm looking at an opportunity cost. You know, there's going to be 2822 04:26:40,480 --> 04:26:46,940 another project in six months a year or five years. So how quickly will that account replenish? 2823 04:26:46,940 --> 04:26:50,520 Yeah, that's a good budget conversation with the Council of the Shirt. 2824 04:26:50,600 --> 04:26:57,520 Shirt version of that is that up and tell the real estate exercise taxes allowed to be used for affordable housing. 2825 04:26:58,760 --> 04:27:06,720 We all of our contributions are essentially through arch and the arch trust fund and that project returning to the city when they are funded by arch. 2826 04:27:07,120 --> 04:27:10,360 Real estate exercise tax currently has to be spent within the city limits. 2827 04:27:11,120 --> 04:27:15,440 So one of the challenges of saying where would I spend it next if I had on a is. 2828 04:27:16,240 --> 04:27:20,440 Kirk would have long doesn't get sort of the 10 to 1 back that arch does when it goes 2829 04:27:20,440 --> 04:27:21,380 to the current state. 2830 04:27:21,580 --> 04:27:22,220 It gets all the other funding. 2831 04:27:22,540 --> 04:27:26,900 So we would have to have a project where that kind of money would make a difference for 2832 04:27:26,900 --> 04:27:27,660 a Kirk on project. 2833 04:27:28,480 --> 04:27:32,260 And right now, there's a couple ideas out there that we can look at, but we don't have anything 2834 04:27:32,260 --> 04:27:32,940 on that horizon. 2835 04:27:33,300 --> 04:27:37,440 So our intent was really, as opportunities arose, we kept you with proposals for using 2836 04:27:37,440 --> 04:27:39,080 else an exercise tax to make them happen. 2837 04:27:39,840 --> 04:27:42,940 So the whole village could be a concept that we could talk about, there's other places 2838 04:27:42,940 --> 04:27:48,460 to that we could like that. But at the moment, there's nothing where something like 2839 04:27:48,460 --> 04:27:51,700 a space that difference that it would share, where if we used it now, we could make 2840 04:27:51,700 --> 04:27:55,660 it do happen. There's something currently on the table where if we used it, we'd 2841 04:27:55,660 --> 04:27:56,460 know what it would happen. 2842 04:27:57,520 --> 04:27:59,300 Okay. Thank you. It's like a burden of hand. 2843 04:28:00,140 --> 04:28:09,120 So, okay. All right. That was all for me. So, do you feel like you have what you need to take 2844 04:28:09,120 --> 04:28:10,040 the next steps? 2845 04:28:10,800 --> 04:28:12,460 Yes, thanks for all the feedback. 2846 04:28:13,620 --> 04:28:13,780 Okay. 2847 04:28:14,420 --> 04:28:14,720 All right. 2848 04:28:14,780 --> 04:28:15,540 Thank you, Robert. 2849 04:28:15,620 --> 04:28:17,580 Angela, for staying late with us. 2850 04:28:19,410 --> 04:28:20,230 We'll see you soon. 2851 04:28:20,490 --> 04:28:21,470 Thank you very much. 2852 04:28:21,690 --> 04:28:22,990 We deeply appreciate it. 2853 04:28:25,810 --> 04:28:25,950 Right. 2854 04:28:26,210 --> 04:28:30,270 We are moving on to nine E, which is 2855 04:28:30,270 --> 04:28:33,690 briefing on the total, like, southern industrial sub-area 2856 04:28:33,690 --> 04:28:35,010 visioning city manager. 2857 04:28:35,190 --> 04:28:36,550 I'm guessing out of staying. 2858 04:28:39,010 --> 04:28:42,210 Yeah, so this is an item where we're going to probably appreciate 2859 04:28:42,210 --> 04:28:45,930 I was already providing information, not looking for decision 2860 04:28:45,930 --> 04:28:49,130 by the council today, just information exchange and feedback. 2861 04:28:49,550 --> 04:28:52,070 Go ahead, turn it back to Adam Weinstein, what do you feel like turning? 2862 04:28:53,030 --> 04:28:54,850 Actually, Martha Rubar, I'm just going to take this one, 2863 04:28:54,930 --> 04:28:55,910 and I'll see you in your planner. 2864 04:28:58,750 --> 04:28:59,330 Thank you. 2865 04:28:59,510 --> 04:29:00,610 Thank you, City Manager. 2866 04:29:02,310 --> 04:29:04,670 Just one moment here. 2867 04:29:19,380 --> 04:29:19,380 Yeah, 2868 04:29:29,400 --> 04:29:30,420 apologies for that. 2869 04:29:30,460 --> 04:29:31,680 It's technical difficulties. 2870 04:29:31,680 --> 04:29:40,780 Can you see my screen okay? We can, okay, thank you. Good evening Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Council members. 2871 04:29:41,100 --> 04:29:46,420 I'll be presenting tonight on the Totem Lakes Southern Industrial Sub area, Phase 1. 2872 04:29:46,920 --> 04:29:54,400 I have 10 slides to cover and there is no formal direction requested from Council tonight on this project. 2873 04:29:58,630 --> 04:29:59,590 So, 2874 04:30:00,000 --> 04:30:29,300 Brief background on the area for those who aren't familiar. This area is located in the southwest corner of the totem like urban growth center. It is made up of warehouses built between the 1960s and 1980s primarily for manufacturing and light industrial uses within proximity to what used to be the railway, but as now the cross-curcant corridor, which you can see in this map running north south in green. 2875 04:30:30,360 --> 04:30:36,540 And over time, the area transition to be a mix of office, construction of retail, wholesale 2876 04:30:36,540 --> 04:30:42,580 distribution, automotive uses, indoor recreation, and other service uses. 2877 04:30:44,540 --> 04:30:49,420 And there are a couple of residential developments within the area today, including an apartment 2878 04:30:49,420 --> 04:30:52,740 complex and two town home developments. 2879 04:30:54,900 --> 04:31:01,240 And Forbes Creek runs through the area, but it is mostly hidden behind parking lots and 2880 04:31:01,240 --> 04:31:02,700 warehouse buildings today. 2881 04:31:07,160 --> 04:31:14,760 So this project began back in 2022 with a community initiated amendment request that the 2882 04:31:14,760 --> 04:31:21,240 city received to resume several parcels on the western side of the sub area, which we call 2883 04:31:21,240 --> 04:31:26,800 the Parmac sites to allow for high density residential mixed uses. 2884 04:31:27,480 --> 04:31:33,300 And in 2023 through the review of the request, Council decided to expand the Parmac 2885 04:31:33,300 --> 04:31:38,820 car study area to include the full southern industrial sub-area neighborhood. 2886 04:31:40,860 --> 04:31:50,160 And then in 2024, as part of the Compland Policy Process Policy TL33.1 was adopted to create 2887 04:31:50,160 --> 04:31:55,420 sub-area plan for this area to consider a new mixed-used walkable and sustainable 2888 04:31:55,420 --> 04:31:59,360 neighborhood. And then that brings us to where we are today, 2889 04:31:59,780 --> 04:32:06,160 what I'm presenting on tonight, which is Phase I of developing that sub-area plan. 2890 04:32:06,440 --> 04:32:09,520 So, the city received a grant to partner with a team from Denmark, 2891 04:32:10,540 --> 04:32:16,440 Blocksub on Phase I, and Phase I has been focused on understanding existing 2892 04:32:16,440 --> 04:32:22,320 conditions of the area, initial stakeholder engagement, and visioning for the area. 2893 04:32:24,100 --> 04:32:30,740 And then next year in 2027, phase two will commence, which will be the full separate 2894 04:32:30,740 --> 04:32:38,440 planning process and include an evaluation of market conditions for the existing uses and 2895 04:32:38,440 --> 04:32:41,240 explore opportunities to expand housing allowances. 2896 04:32:41,240 --> 04:32:42,180 So, 2897 04:32:47,040 --> 04:32:53,360 as I mentioned, we have partnered with Blocks Hub for this initial visioning phase for this other industrial sub-area. 2898 04:32:54,080 --> 04:33:00,260 Blocks Hub is a Nordic Hub for a sustainable urbanization, basin Copenhagen, and we've partnered with them previously. 2899 04:33:01,880 --> 04:33:09,920 There are work focuses on facilitating cross-sector collaboration with cities around the world to address shared urban challenges. 2900 04:33:09,920 --> 04:33:21,020 And for this project, they assembled a team of landscape architects and architect specializing in adaptive reuse and a community engagement specialist. 2901 04:33:21,760 --> 04:33:25,880 And this work was made possible through a grant from the Scan Design Foundation. 2902 04:33:30,190 --> 04:33:35,230 So a major piece of this phase in our work with Blox Hub was community outreach. 2903 04:33:35,230 --> 04:33:43,890 The blocks have team visited Kirkland twice and hosted workshops with the community to understand 2904 04:33:43,890 --> 04:33:50,890 their perspective and collaborate on a shared vision for how the area could improve and evolve 2905 04:33:50,890 --> 04:33:51,870 in the future. 2906 04:33:53,930 --> 04:34:00,330 We visited the area several times to knock on doors and ask employees and business owners about 2907 04:34:00,330 --> 04:34:05,850 what they feel is working well in the area, what could be improved and then also invite them 2908 04:34:05,850 --> 04:34:06,790 to the workshops. 2909 04:34:09,010 --> 04:34:12,570 We also spoke with housing developers in the area and community members 2910 04:34:12,570 --> 04:34:21,010 who frequent the area. And what we heard generally is a general satisfaction with the current mix 2911 04:34:21,010 --> 04:34:27,830 of commercial and residential uses a lot of businesses seem to pretty happy with the way that things 2912 04:34:27,830 --> 04:34:32,050 where in the area, they really value the areas 2913 04:34:32,050 --> 04:34:34,550 affordable and flexible commercial spaces. 2914 04:34:35,670 --> 04:34:37,990 There was some desire for more food options 2915 04:34:37,990 --> 04:34:40,910 in the area for people that grab lunch at, 2916 04:34:43,030 --> 04:34:47,110 and also a strong support for improving access 2917 04:34:47,110 --> 04:34:50,430 to the CKC, kind of opening up the CKC 2918 04:34:50,430 --> 04:34:53,630 to the area to reduce traffic congestion 2919 04:34:53,630 --> 04:34:57,070 and let her connect the area with the rest of the city. 2920 04:34:57,830 --> 04:34:58,510 um 2921 04:35:00,690 --> 04:35:12,570 We also heard a lot about how businesses and community members are often unaware of each other, a lot of the businesses are kind of tucked away and not visited often. 2922 04:35:21,430 --> 04:35:36,510 So, through the outreach and workshops, the team collected over 100 ideas for how the area could evolve or be improved, and then we took those 100 ideas and applied these five criteria to them. 2923 04:35:36,510 --> 04:35:40,430 So connected, experimental, rooted, nature-based, and collaborative, 2924 04:35:42,790 --> 04:35:48,370 and reduced them down to nine design concepts. 2925 04:35:49,850 --> 04:36:04,430 And each of these concepts were fleshed out with the community and with city staff to identify starting points, key actions, how the concept could be scaled, how it could be enabled through regulations. 2926 04:36:04,430 --> 04:36:08,150 and the points of attention for potential hurdles, 2927 04:36:09,230 --> 04:36:11,330 and then lastly, who should be involved with implementation. 2928 04:36:12,390 --> 04:36:16,010 So this diagram here shows all nine of the concepts 2929 04:36:16,750 --> 04:36:19,790 and attachment three in the staff memo, 2930 04:36:20,330 --> 04:36:21,470 includes a lot more detail. 2931 04:36:21,630 --> 04:36:24,010 The blocks have team wrote up a great report, 2932 04:36:25,330 --> 04:36:26,870 detailing each of the nine concepts, 2933 04:36:28,330 --> 04:36:31,430 and kind of all of the key points for them. 2934 04:36:32,390 --> 04:36:38,630 But I am going to touch on two of them, so you get an idea of what they are. 2935 04:36:39,710 --> 04:36:47,250 The first is way finding and murals concept, so the concept is to create an identifying 2936 04:36:47,250 --> 04:36:54,450 logo or icon or color and create way finding signage for the sub-area, which would help create 2937 04:36:54,450 --> 04:36:59,590 an identity for the area and connect the CKC users and surrounding neighborhoods within 2938 04:36:59,590 --> 04:37:07,410 this area, and then murals would also activate the large blank facades, so there's these large 2939 04:37:07,910 --> 04:37:16,190 warehouses that kind of line the CKC and adding some art there would kind of open up and 2940 04:37:16,190 --> 04:37:24,350 add visual interest to those large walls and invite people into the area. The key actions for 2941 04:37:24,350 --> 04:37:32,330 concept were to send out an open call for art and branding proposals, apply the art to 2942 04:37:32,330 --> 04:37:38,570 existing infrastructures such as pavement, utility boxes or these walls, and develop a 2943 04:37:38,570 --> 04:37:44,150 wall-mural concept, maybe focused on the intersection of nature and industry that is 2944 04:37:44,150 --> 04:37:45,170 present in this area. 2945 04:37:45,170 --> 04:37:56,170 The regulatory enablers could be allowing signs, so a sign permit process to allow 2946 04:37:56,170 --> 04:38:02,370 a sandwich board signs or directional signs on the CKC or elsewhere in the area. 2947 04:38:03,550 --> 04:38:05,870 The second concept is the warehouse concept. 2948 04:38:06,950 --> 04:38:12,910 This was created because most of these buildings within this area are column-been structures, 2949 04:38:12,910 --> 04:38:18,610 which are structurally flexible and able to accommodate many different uses. 2950 04:38:21,270 --> 04:38:24,710 And so this creates an opportunity to build upon the existing structures, 2951 04:38:25,290 --> 04:38:28,910 either by converting them to different uses or adding on to them, 2952 04:38:30,070 --> 04:38:36,890 which would preserve the buildings and businesses in the area while accommodating new uses such as housing. 2953 04:38:37,690 --> 04:38:44,030 key actions for this is to develop a transformation and development guide to show what's 2954 04:38:44,030 --> 04:38:48,730 possible for these buildings and gives a clear pathway for development and maybe start 2955 04:38:48,730 --> 04:38:52,250 with a pilot as a live demonstration for the community. 2956 04:38:54,250 --> 04:39:00,850 Regulatory of Navelers may be offer a height bonus for these projects and pre-approved permit 2957 04:39:00,850 --> 04:39:08,710 pathways to expedite them and then potential hurdles, points of attention, is mitigation could 2958 04:39:08,710 --> 04:39:14,070 be needed for mixing of residential and industrial uses and transformation could potentially 2959 04:39:14,070 --> 04:39:16,590 increase property value and displace businesses. 2960 04:39:22,750 --> 04:39:27,850 So looking at the comprehensive plan policy for this area, our phase one work has begun 2961 04:39:27,850 --> 04:39:34,090 looking at many of the objectives of the policy and the components that will be included 2962 04:39:34,090 --> 04:39:41,510 in the Siberia plan analysis, so I've copied the policy here in italics and then the pieces 2963 04:39:41,510 --> 04:39:47,790 of the policy that phase 1 has begun to make progress on. I won't walk through each of them, 2964 04:39:47,870 --> 04:39:50,110 but happy to answer any questions about them. 2965 04:39:55,360 --> 04:39:58,860 So the key takeaways from this work are that 2966 04:40:00,000 --> 04:40:18,360 There's a lot of life in this area today. There's many small and large businesses in this area. When we were walking around and talking with them, it was clear that they really enjoy having their business located in this area and rely on the large flexible and affordable spaces that exist. 2967 04:40:18,360 --> 04:40:25,920 Some examples of the businesses that exist here are a custom closet store, a cookie company, 2968 04:40:26,240 --> 04:40:32,400 a catering company, a brewery, tennis center, a lighting store, a tortilla company, 2969 04:40:32,740 --> 04:40:39,160 auto repair shops, card dealership, a door company, drywall company, hardware store, and many 2970 04:40:39,160 --> 04:40:40,100 others. 2971 04:40:40,100 --> 04:40:43,320 And, yeah, it was fun to talk with everyone. 2972 04:40:47,430 --> 04:40:49,970 Existing relationships between businesses and residents 2973 04:40:49,970 --> 04:40:52,530 and this rounding area are pretty limited. 2974 04:40:52,830 --> 04:40:57,390 We heard a lot of businesses saying that they didn't know that each other existed. 2975 04:40:59,150 --> 04:41:02,810 There are two prominent buckets of businesses in the area. 2976 04:41:03,590 --> 04:41:08,050 There's indoor recreation businesses and construction businesses. 2977 04:41:08,050 --> 04:41:15,930 And based on what we heard, it sounds like within those buckets, they have a symbiotic relationship with each other. 2978 04:41:16,150 --> 04:41:20,390 But the businesses outside of those buckets are pretty siloed and hidden away. 2979 04:41:22,290 --> 04:41:29,270 We learned that the area would benefit from a stronger identity and name that reflects its character. 2980 04:41:29,270 --> 04:41:35,670 So some characteristics that could be incorporated are the industry and nature, intersection, 2981 04:41:36,030 --> 04:41:42,230 theme, production, construction, and experimentation, and the play and recreation theme. 2982 04:41:45,030 --> 04:41:50,340 It also became very clear that the CKC is the area's living spine. It provides green space, 2983 04:41:51,270 --> 04:41:56,670 gathering space, and creates an opportunity to connect businesses, customers, 2984 04:41:56,670 --> 04:42:01,470 the nearby open spaces and also the regional destinations. 2985 04:42:04,010 --> 04:42:06,890 And lastly, there are many low-hanging fruit opportunities 2986 04:42:07,670 --> 04:42:11,010 that exist that could be implemented in this area 2987 04:42:11,540 --> 04:42:16,750 and improve it while simultaneously advancing the city's policy goals 2988 04:42:16,750 --> 04:42:20,570 such as the way of finding and mural's concept along with others. 2989 04:42:23,960 --> 04:42:29,300 And that brings us to my last slide, which are the next steps for this project. 2990 04:42:29,880 --> 04:42:36,260 We will share the final design report with the stakeholders of the area once it's finalized. 2991 04:42:37,380 --> 04:42:44,960 And then phase two of this project will begin in 2027, which will include analysis of commercial and light industrial lands, 2992 04:42:45,200 --> 04:42:48,300 and then further exploration of expanding housing allowances. 2993 04:42:48,980 --> 04:42:58,300 The design concepts and visioning work and outreach that we've done in phase one can be incorporated into the sub-area plan under phase two. 2994 04:43:00,780 --> 04:43:09,460 And I also wanted to say before passing it back to the mayor, just a huge thank you to the Blockshead team and the experts that they involved in this project. 2995 04:43:10,100 --> 04:43:14,700 they've brought really creative ideas for our community outreach and 2996 04:43:14,700 --> 04:43:20,620 solutions to these kind of bigger complex questions and lots of 2997 04:43:20,620 --> 04:43:24,380 inspiration for sustainability and urban design and community building 2998 04:43:24,380 --> 04:43:28,660 methods. So it's been fun to work with them and a huge thank you to 2999 04:43:28,660 --> 04:43:31,980 that team for their collaboration. I'll pass it back to you Madam Mayor. 3000 04:43:33,280 --> 04:43:38,300 Thank you, Martha, and I also echo your thanks to Blocks Hub. 3001 04:43:38,540 --> 04:43:41,840 I really enjoyed participating in the first stakeholder group. 3002 04:43:41,920 --> 04:43:43,600 It was really great. 3003 04:43:43,940 --> 04:43:49,460 And I'm very hungry, and you start talking about cookies and tortillas and stuff. 3004 04:43:50,580 --> 04:43:51,120 All right. 3005 04:43:51,400 --> 04:43:52,220 Councillor Passebel. 3006 04:43:54,650 --> 04:43:59,350 Yeah, thank you for all the effort on this, Martha. 3007 04:44:00,670 --> 04:44:06,430 Yeah, I mean, it's fun to see, great to see that kind of a policy, the complex policy 3008 04:44:06,430 --> 04:44:11,950 comes to life, so to speak, kind of moving that policy forward to implementation. 3009 04:44:13,470 --> 04:44:17,430 And like the mayor got, and the deputy mayor got to participate in the workshop with 3010 04:44:17,430 --> 04:44:24,370 blocks of and the other community members that participated and it was, I participated in 3011 04:44:24,370 --> 04:44:29,690 work shops and, you know, things like that over the years and it was something different 3012 04:44:29,690 --> 04:44:40,510 and unique and well, well done. So impressed by the team as well. I just wanted to just offer my 3013 04:44:40,510 --> 04:44:47,130 support for the continued kind of phase two efforts. I think this is going in the right direction 3014 04:44:47,130 --> 04:44:59,970 and I just support that. I wanted to just ask a question, though, of staff. We did receive an email from the planning. 3015 04:45:00,000 --> 04:45:10,060 Commission chair, recommending to forego some of this work and development of the sub-area plan this week. 3016 04:45:10,760 --> 04:45:19,760 I was wondering if from staff's perspective, is any of the work that we've done to date back that recommendation out? 3017 04:45:19,760 --> 04:45:20,760 I don't 3018 04:45:25,940 --> 04:45:27,200 know if I can. 3019 04:45:27,540 --> 04:45:28,060 It's your question. 3020 04:45:28,400 --> 04:45:31,140 It would be learned something that would allow us to pass it as a 3021 04:45:31,140 --> 04:45:31,480 question. 3022 04:45:32,080 --> 04:45:35,140 Well, I'm just wondering if, did we learn something through that 3023 04:45:35,140 --> 04:45:38,940 where staffs now recommending us to do what the planning 3024 04:45:38,940 --> 04:45:41,760 commission chairs suggesting which is just not 3025 04:45:41,760 --> 04:45:43,100 to do the sub-variant plan? 3026 04:45:46,940 --> 04:45:47,600 Adam, go ahead. 3027 04:45:48,820 --> 04:45:49,440 Yeah, thanks. 3028 04:45:51,560 --> 04:45:53,440 We're still in the early stages, I think. 3029 04:45:53,580 --> 04:45:55,660 I mean, I think one of the challenges of this area is 3030 04:45:55,660 --> 04:45:58,480 Martha pointed out is that there's this amazing 3031 04:45:58,480 --> 04:46:00,840 fabric of small businesses here, right? 3032 04:46:00,840 --> 04:46:03,020 And there's not a lot of industrial land in the city. 3033 04:46:03,120 --> 04:46:09,760 So I think one of the things that we still haven't completely understood is the role 3034 04:46:09,760 --> 04:46:16,820 of these industrial zones in the city, and the fact there aren't many of them, and they're 3035 04:46:16,820 --> 04:46:18,240 relatively fragile, right? 3036 04:46:18,360 --> 04:46:22,300 And so I think there is what we learned is that there are opportunities for housing here, 3037 04:46:22,380 --> 04:46:27,680 but exactly where that goes and how much of it I think is still something that is to be determined. 3038 04:46:27,680 --> 04:46:33,280 And I think, you know, when we get through the budget process and start talking more about 3039 04:46:33,280 --> 04:46:37,440 phase two, there might be an option to look at alternatives to a sub-area plan. 3040 04:46:38,120 --> 04:46:41,360 But I think that there's still probably a little more exploration that we want to do to figure 3041 04:46:42,140 --> 04:46:44,280 out, you know, how housing fits into this area. 3042 04:46:44,520 --> 04:46:49,020 Again, I think our takeaway is that it is a really unique place and the businesses there 3043 04:46:49,020 --> 04:46:54,760 at Martha said really do value the flexibility and low costs of the spaces. 3044 04:46:57,180 --> 04:47:06,220 Yeah, I guess it was always my impression that the sub-variant plan would consider how and if the area transitions over time, right, 3045 04:47:08,520 --> 04:47:23,780 that it might not stay intact, even with some of these changes that over time, it could change over the housing and more density and things like that and what what infrastructure would be necessary to support that. 3046 04:47:24,760 --> 04:47:54,740 You know, so what I'm hoping that that finding effort would, you know, evaluate, so I was just, I guess I was just a little surprise to read in that email that it made sound like we've already made a decision and that we just target residential to small portions of the subbury and I don't know that I just, I don't feel like the council's made that decision yet or the subbury plan has really made that determination or not subbury plan. 3047 04:47:54,760 --> 04:47:57,160 but that phase one efforts have made that determination. 3048 04:47:58,780 --> 04:48:01,840 So I'm just wondering if you agree with that or not. 3049 04:48:04,020 --> 04:48:06,400 Again, I think we'd look for a council direction on that issue, 3050 04:48:06,720 --> 04:48:08,220 but again, I think there's probably a little more work 3051 04:48:08,220 --> 04:48:10,180 that can be done that we can bring back to council 3052 04:48:10,180 --> 04:48:12,660 where you can help us, you know, you can guide us 3053 04:48:12,660 --> 04:48:16,540 in that next step, and we can bring back options 3054 04:48:16,540 --> 04:48:18,600 the next time we talk about the next phase 3055 04:48:18,600 --> 04:48:20,000 of the project as well. 3056 04:48:24,200 --> 04:48:25,940 But you don't feel like you've received direction 3057 04:48:25,940 --> 04:48:29,400 from us on that, yeah, correct, okay. 3058 04:48:29,400 --> 04:48:32,120 Thank you. Thank you. Councillor O'Pran. 3059 04:48:34,180 --> 04:48:42,160 Yeah, I just had a question on kind of the timeline for these studies, so for this phase two was study. 3060 04:48:43,120 --> 04:48:50,800 Like, what is the approximate amount of time it will take from start to finish and then let's just start that. 3061 04:48:57,110 --> 04:49:04,630 I can jump in again. I'm a list of Martha or Ali and one two, but we haven't, yes, sure. We have a program for a year on the planning work program. 3062 04:49:06,230 --> 04:49:08,910 Again, that's a gross estimate, I would say. 3063 04:49:09,250 --> 04:49:18,330 As you know, as you know, from our experience with the stationary plan, right, we took a lot longer than a year to do a big stationary plan with all of its attendant technical studies. 3064 04:49:18,530 --> 04:49:32,050 So I think the sort of a scale of change in the sub-area, most particularly how much housing we end up accommodating in the station and the sub-area and how much infrastructure is needed to support that. 3065 04:49:32,050 --> 04:49:34,710 I think will be a determinant of how long the process takes, 3066 04:49:35,170 --> 04:49:37,170 but again, right now we schedule the year for it. 3067 04:49:38,570 --> 04:49:42,670 And is there a way to like speed that up by any chance 3068 04:49:42,670 --> 04:49:45,510 or like, you know, I guess one of the main factors 3069 04:49:45,510 --> 04:49:48,710 and determinants, so you said one of the main factors 3070 04:49:48,710 --> 04:49:53,250 is how many potential areas you'd have to evaluate 3071 04:49:53,250 --> 04:49:56,270 for housing that could increase the overall timing. 3072 04:49:56,630 --> 04:49:59,010 Is there anything else that could increase the time 3073 04:49:59,010 --> 04:49:59,970 or decrease the time? 3074 04:50:00,000 --> 04:50:03,920 To be able to finish this, please two. 3075 04:50:04,660 --> 04:50:07,840 Yeah, there's thanks Councillor Prim. There's probably a lot of variables, right? 3076 04:50:07,900 --> 04:50:14,080 I think a big one, right, that, you know, elongated the timeline for the stationary plan was all 3077 04:50:14,080 --> 04:50:18,400 the technical studies that we did to support that work, which were really useful studies, 3078 04:50:18,760 --> 04:50:22,580 right? We did infrastructure studies, traffic studies. We did a really big, comprehensive, 3079 04:50:22,620 --> 04:50:27,760 environmental impact statement for that project. We developed other things to go along with the plan. 3080 04:50:27,760 --> 04:50:33,260 So I think what we would typically do is come to you relatively early on in the process, come 3081 04:50:33,260 --> 04:50:38,780 to council and present you with a couple of alternatives for gross scenarios in the zone, 3082 04:50:38,820 --> 04:50:44,520 and then you could give us guidance on that, and then we could identify a scope of technical 3083 04:50:44,520 --> 04:50:47,620 work that would go along with that. 3084 04:50:47,880 --> 04:50:52,160 So maybe that's a non-answer to your question, but I think we would present you with options 3085 04:50:52,160 --> 04:50:56,240 some of which could lead to a shorter process, some of which would resolve a no longer process. 3086 04:50:58,160 --> 04:50:59,120 Thank you. 3087 04:50:59,140 --> 04:51:00,400 Thank you. 3088 04:51:00,920 --> 04:51:01,960 Anyone else? 3089 04:51:12,310 --> 04:51:13,030 Deputy Mayor? 3090 04:51:15,600 --> 04:51:16,020 Thanks, Mayor. 3091 04:51:16,140 --> 04:51:23,080 I just wanted to make sure I gave my guidance to Council R to staff that I do like the idea. 3092 04:51:23,160 --> 04:51:24,320 I like the direction we're going. 3093 04:51:24,560 --> 04:51:26,760 I want to proceed with the phase two. 3094 04:51:27,760 --> 04:51:34,980 I do recall why I supported this from the very get go in the connection with the approval of the complaint. 3095 04:51:34,980 --> 04:51:42,520 I did want us to try to take a thoughtful approach to this area, look at it district-wide through 3096 04:51:42,520 --> 04:51:47,520 district-wide planning, and see if there was a way to protect the existing light and 3097 04:51:47,520 --> 04:51:54,400 industrial foster some really creative commercial uses while encouraging sort of innovative 3098 04:51:55,240 --> 04:52:01,820 housing in this area. So that's the direction I feel like we're going. I think it's worth the 3099 04:52:01,820 --> 04:52:06,840 investment of thoughtfulness and its approach. 3100 04:52:09,100 --> 04:52:15,280 And I'm cognizant of the fact that right now with the macroeconomic environment, what we're 3101 04:52:15,280 --> 04:52:22,080 hearing from developers and their interest in new projects, or at least the kind of new 3102 04:52:22,080 --> 04:52:23,260 projects we want to see here. 3103 04:52:23,260 --> 04:52:31,520 I don't know that if we just expedited approval of housing, that we would get anything like 3104 04:52:31,520 --> 04:52:35,760 that we get any projects or that we get anything like the kind of projects that we want to see in 3105 04:52:35,760 --> 04:52:40,100 this area. So that's why I want to take this thoughtful project, appreciate the thoughtfulness 3106 04:52:40,100 --> 04:52:45,700 that's gone into this and I'm willing to invest in my vote. It's not a vote. I know my direction 3107 04:52:45,700 --> 04:52:53,780 is that we continue down this sort of deliberate thoughtful approach to this whole district. I really 3108 04:52:53,780 --> 04:52:58,640 want to see, this could be a great legacy for this council. 3109 04:52:59,180 --> 04:53:01,060 So, thank you. 3110 04:53:01,280 --> 04:53:02,720 Thank you, Councilor Arnold. 3111 04:53:05,900 --> 04:53:10,780 Thank you, Mayor, and thank you, Martha and planning team 3112 04:53:10,780 --> 04:53:16,940 on this, I came into this where reading the Blocks Hub report 3113 04:53:16,940 --> 04:53:21,040 was the first I've seen of this, and it's 3114 04:53:21,040 --> 04:53:23,200 was impressed at the scale of their vision 3115 04:53:23,200 --> 04:53:27,460 and how to talk about large transformation in this area. 3116 04:53:27,640 --> 04:53:29,760 There's some intriguing ideas there. 3117 04:53:30,280 --> 04:53:35,620 That's said, I'm not ready for wholesale complete change 3118 04:53:35,620 --> 04:53:39,200 across the entire Southern industrial sub-area. 3119 04:53:39,700 --> 04:53:41,800 My feedback would be to look for options 3120 04:53:42,680 --> 04:53:45,420 for a narrow scope for phase two. 3121 04:53:46,120 --> 04:53:49,540 It's going to be important to preserve the light and industrial, 3122 04:53:50,640 --> 04:53:55,800 especially between one 12th and one 16th and then as was mentioned the presentation. 3123 04:53:57,880 --> 04:54:04,800 As we look to say, how do we maintain or for those affordable flexible commercial spaces? 3124 04:54:05,760 --> 04:54:18,320 Can they coexist or are we looking at some different geographical areas that may be appropriate for converting to housing? 3125 04:54:18,320 --> 04:54:32,220 And as we look at the feedback from Aaron Jacobson and Gina Medea, which I will note that E-mail 3126 04:54:32,220 --> 04:54:38,860 was then offering feedback as individuals, not as the Planning Commission Chair and Vice Chair. 3127 04:54:40,500 --> 04:54:47,100 I do like the idea of evaluating and recommending areas within this industrial summer that 3128 04:54:47,100 --> 04:54:58,880 maybe appropriate to move first on and that might be an option for scoping future phases depending on the narrowed area or scope. 3129 04:55:00,000 --> 04:55:12,760 It may make the sub-area plan easier. And it may make the need for a market study, which is also requirement, no longer needed. So, want to look at those particular options. 3130 04:55:13,780 --> 04:55:22,620 And then finally, I understand one of the stakeholder groups actually had an inventory of businesses in the area. 3131 04:55:22,620 --> 04:55:27,220 I think that'd be some important information to share. 3132 04:55:27,420 --> 04:55:30,100 I know several of the examples that we're mentioned. 3133 04:55:30,960 --> 04:55:37,360 I am aware of there are others that I may not have just from my own walking the corridor 3134 04:55:37,360 --> 04:55:43,500 and being in the neighborhood and would like to look at this in a detailed and comprehensive 3135 04:55:43,500 --> 04:55:43,980 event. 3136 04:55:44,580 --> 04:55:45,220 Thank you. 3137 04:55:45,560 --> 04:55:47,000 Thank you. 3138 04:55:47,260 --> 04:55:47,840 Anyone else? 3139 04:55:53,170 --> 04:55:53,450 Okay. 3140 04:55:53,450 --> 04:55:55,710 first. Oh, Deputy Mayor. 3141 04:55:58,140 --> 04:56:04,480 Deputy Mayor, are you raising your hand? I did. Yeah. And I apologize for interrupting 3142 04:56:04,480 --> 04:56:09,760 you. You certainly still feel welcome to make your remarks. I was just going to highlight that 3143 04:56:09,760 --> 04:56:16,620 as I listened to us, I think this is one of those examples where we may not be giving staff as 3144 04:56:16,620 --> 04:56:23,240 clear direction as we need to. And so I do think one question I have for staff is whether they've 3145 04:56:23,240 --> 04:56:28,680 what they really need from us. I feel like there's a we're a little bit all over the 3146 04:56:28,680 --> 04:56:32,800 not all over the map but we're a little bit we've covered some territory on the map 3147 04:56:32,800 --> 04:56:34,140 in our feedback. 3148 04:56:37,720 --> 04:56:45,160 City manager I see your hand. Well so quick I think yes in a sense that 3149 04:56:46,300 --> 04:56:56,260 we're going to come back with options about how the 27 studies go and options that the 3150 04:56:56,260 --> 04:57:04,600 but there's no change in what the Hop-Up language says yet and there's no change in the idea that we need to come back at 3151 04:57:04,600 --> 04:57:09,140 27 to look at the sub-area. But I think some ideas on things in the scope that we could bring you as 3152 04:57:09,140 --> 04:57:14,500 options for the full council get discussing debate and decided upon in 27 through the planning 3153 04:57:14,500 --> 04:57:21,040 or program. That's how I interpret it. Great. As long as staff is getting what they need, 3154 04:57:21,040 --> 04:57:23,440 I, that's great, thank you. 3155 04:57:25,000 --> 04:57:26,540 Councilman, our phone, come on. 3156 04:57:26,640 --> 04:57:28,380 Thank you, Madam Mayor, I wasn't going to speak, 3157 04:57:29,060 --> 04:57:30,880 but the ends of your hair raises a good point, 3158 04:57:30,960 --> 04:57:33,360 so I just wanted to share one of my thoughts 3159 04:57:33,360 --> 04:57:35,420 that may be helpful for staff in the direction 3160 04:57:35,420 --> 04:57:39,320 is that I support Councilman Arnold's thoughts 3161 04:57:39,320 --> 04:57:42,580 on seeing if there's ways to break this into smaller parts 3162 04:57:42,580 --> 04:57:44,660 to be more efficient in doing the work. 3163 04:57:45,460 --> 04:57:46,800 So, a plus one to that please. 3164 04:57:49,480 --> 04:57:51,260 Thank you, anyone else? 3165 04:57:51,260 --> 04:58:03,060 Go in once. Going twice. All right. Martha, good job. I really appreciated the thoughtfulness 3166 04:58:03,060 --> 04:58:08,620 that we're behind this. I really appreciated the work that everyone put in to reach 3167 04:58:08,620 --> 04:58:13,940 an out to the existing businesses and getting their input. I think that's super important 3168 04:58:13,940 --> 04:58:19,940 and it's not something we usually do. And what's really clear about this is this is a very unique 3169 04:58:19,940 --> 04:58:28,920 area. This is unlike anything else that we have within the city, both in where it resides 3170 04:58:28,920 --> 04:58:36,200 within the Total Lake Regional Center and the kinds of businesses it's in. So I am 3171 04:58:36,200 --> 04:58:43,140 not interested in cutting this up in little pieces. I think it's really important that 3172 04:58:43,140 --> 04:58:49,400 we do this strategically and thoughtfully and look at it holistically. I think that the 3173 04:58:49,400 --> 04:58:56,580 policy that was in the comprehensive plan was well done, and so I support staying with the 3174 04:58:56,580 --> 04:59:04,240 policy and doing the work to design this area that will become very special. So thank you 3175 04:59:04,240 --> 04:59:12,720 for that. Anyone else? All right. Thank you, Martha. Thank you, Adam. Thank you, Alison. You may 3176 04:59:12,720 --> 04:59:22,680 go home and go to bed. Hopefully you'll have very far to go. Okay, council. It is 1107 and we have 3177 04:59:22,680 --> 04:59:30,820 council policies and procedures and we also have three LRMs. So my suggestion is that we delay 3178 04:59:30,820 --> 04:59:39,380 9F council policy procedures to a later meeting and go ahead and go into reports and the LRMs. 3179 04:59:39,380 --> 04:59:45,800 any objections to that thumbs up. Thank you, Councilor Arnold, Councilmember Tim Chisen. 3180 04:59:49,840 --> 04:59:55,620 I don't object, but I have some policies and procedure amendments that I'll 3181 04:59:55,620 --> 04:59:59,980 be bringing at the next meeting, so I do want to address the issue at some point. 3182 05:00:00,000 --> 05:00:22,100 Thank you. All right. So, do I have a thumbs up for everybody? Okay. We will postpone 9F and we will decide a figure out when it could be on the council calendar again. So, we are going to move into council reports and I will start with deputy mayor and let's keep them short folks. 3183 05:00:23,140 --> 05:00:30,060 Okay. Just quick note that the mayor and I got to visit the South County Recycling 3184 05:00:30,060 --> 05:00:37,640 and Transportation in Algonna. Last Friday, I want to thank the staff of the city and 3185 05:00:37,640 --> 05:00:46,760 of the county for that tour. It's the latest, most advanced version of a recycling and 3186 05:00:46,760 --> 05:00:53,480 for station that the county's built. So that was really informative. I wanted to highlight that 3187 05:00:53,480 --> 05:01:01,640 next Wednesday, I'm going to be attending a convening by Challenge Seattle and Greater Seattle 3188 05:01:01,640 --> 05:01:10,140 Partners to discuss sort of economic development priorities with our mayors. The mayor was invited. 3189 05:01:10,820 --> 05:01:16,260 She's unable to attend. So I just want my colleagues to know I'm going to be attending that in the mayors 3190 05:01:16,260 --> 05:01:20,820 Instead, really enjoyed national light out last night. 3191 05:01:21,380 --> 05:01:29,280 Thank you to all of the first responders and the community who both organized the block 3192 05:01:29,280 --> 05:01:36,320 parties and again, of course, the first responders that took us out and particularly KPD who drove 3193 05:01:37,220 --> 05:01:44,080 us around. And then I do have, there is a joint LRM on shared 3194 05:01:44,080 --> 05:01:50,320 e-mobility that Councilmember Paskell Councilmember Arnold and I are going to present. 3195 05:01:50,500 --> 05:01:58,180 I'm going to leave that to Councilmember Paskell or Arnold to present during their Council 3196 05:01:58,180 --> 05:01:58,540 reports. 3197 05:01:58,740 --> 05:01:59,700 That's it. 3198 05:02:00,040 --> 05:02:03,960 LRMs happened during city manager reports, not Council reports. 3199 05:02:04,320 --> 05:02:04,560 Sorry. 3200 05:02:05,100 --> 05:02:08,160 I'll leave it to them to bring it up during city manager reports. 3201 05:02:08,540 --> 05:02:08,940 Thank you. 3202 05:02:08,980 --> 05:02:09,880 Councilmember Paskell. 3203 05:02:11,840 --> 05:02:15,780 I don't have anything to report that can't be reported to be email. 3204 05:02:16,140 --> 05:02:16,740 Thank you. 3205 05:02:16,760 --> 05:02:17,180 Thank you. 3206 05:02:17,780 --> 05:02:18,880 Thank you. 3207 05:02:19,720 --> 05:02:19,800 Yes. 3208 05:02:19,920 --> 05:02:22,140 Since it's late, I'm only going to mention one thing. 3209 05:02:22,860 --> 05:02:23,380 And that is. 3210 05:02:23,520 --> 05:02:23,960 Thank you. 3211 05:02:24,120 --> 05:02:28,080 Everyone who's come out to watch the amazing young athletes at this week's Junior League 3212 05:02:28,080 --> 05:02:29,580 Softball World Series. 3213 05:02:29,840 --> 05:02:31,700 And ever as part, it's been so fun. 3214 05:02:32,160 --> 05:02:33,900 I know I've been out there every day. 3215 05:02:34,460 --> 05:02:37,740 I know I saw Deputy City Manager Lopez out there. 3216 05:02:37,740 --> 05:02:41,960 know that Councillor Arhol has been out there, so if you haven't been out there, definitely 3217 05:02:41,960 --> 05:02:47,160 check it out, it's so much fun, there's a lot of great energy and the games run through 3218 05:02:47,160 --> 05:02:48,220 Saturday morning. 3219 05:02:48,620 --> 05:02:49,180 Thank you. 3220 05:02:49,280 --> 05:02:49,700 Thank you. 3221 05:02:49,980 --> 05:02:50,800 Councillor Pribb. 3222 05:02:52,220 --> 05:02:53,240 Yeah, nothing to report. 3223 05:02:53,720 --> 05:02:54,160 I'll be sending. 3224 05:02:55,060 --> 05:02:55,780 Thank you. 3225 05:02:55,960 --> 05:02:56,940 Councillor Mayor Arld. 3226 05:02:57,300 --> 05:02:57,900 No report. 3227 05:02:58,380 --> 05:02:59,480 Councillor Mayor Regens, isn't. 3228 05:02:59,660 --> 05:03:00,280 I report. 3229 05:03:00,740 --> 05:03:01,420 Thank you. 3230 05:03:02,120 --> 05:03:07,180 My report I will send, but I do want to take a moment to thank City staff and everyone that 3231 05:03:07,180 --> 05:03:13,040 We're behind the scenes to make sure that this meeting went smoothly, really, really appreciate it. 3232 05:03:13,160 --> 05:03:14,060 So thank you, everyone. 3233 05:03:14,620 --> 05:03:17,200 City Manager, I'm handing it over to you. 3234 05:03:18,540 --> 05:03:22,260 But you have one short update, and then I'll call for the calendar and LRM. 3235 05:03:22,480 --> 05:03:23,860 Question, the short update. 3236 05:03:25,800 --> 05:03:32,600 I think you may all know we are now part of a municipal city jail caucus that came out of our legislative actions. 3237 05:03:32,600 --> 05:03:37,420 And that cost us, we found ourselves in the realm of being the community, and in a Campbell. 3238 05:03:38,100 --> 05:03:39,880 I don't know what affairs banjo is building that. 3239 05:03:40,420 --> 05:03:43,600 We had a meeting with Roger Goodman to discuss the idea as a group of, 3240 05:03:44,360 --> 05:03:47,640 the city's meant certain standards for the jail operations could they get, 3241 05:03:48,660 --> 05:03:52,120 sort of a safe harbor from lawsuits, 3242 05:03:52,340 --> 05:03:54,380 especially if there's injuries or death in the jail. 3243 05:03:55,040 --> 05:03:58,780 So, my jails are facing basically extinction if you have one bad event, 3244 05:03:58,800 --> 05:04:00,480 you could lose blades of dollars in settlement. 3245 05:04:00,480 --> 05:04:04,580 So, I just want to let you know that since the legislative record hasn't been able to be part of this yet, 3246 05:04:05,580 --> 05:04:10,180 we, my author, I have a good men and his suggests most being with Senator Mocketingra, who's a chair of the Senate committee. 3247 05:04:10,340 --> 05:04:15,680 We did that yesterday and several of the mayors from the cities were there as well as us. 3248 05:04:15,680 --> 05:04:17,400 It's a really great meeting. 3249 05:04:17,540 --> 05:04:21,660 She told us that she would be willing to potentially sponsor a benefit met her parameters, 3250 05:04:21,680 --> 05:04:22,580 which she laid out. 3251 05:04:23,620 --> 05:04:26,580 But, um, on all of your behalf, some behalf of our corrections department, 3252 05:04:26,580 --> 05:04:29,180 others, we're making some progress on this issue. 3253 05:04:29,180 --> 05:04:33,100 I just want to know about it because it's kind of happening outside of our normal legislative 3254 05:04:33,100 --> 05:04:35,820 work process, but we had a really good meeting with the senator. 3255 05:04:37,600 --> 05:04:39,080 Much more to come. 3256 05:04:41,220 --> 05:04:41,460 All right. 3257 05:04:41,760 --> 05:04:45,420 So next we're the calendar and I know we have a couple of legislative request memos. 3258 05:04:46,140 --> 05:04:49,540 So the city attorney's office has been kind enough to put them out of slides for us all. 3259 05:04:50,860 --> 05:04:53,180 So we did them kind of in the end and we'll receive them. 3260 05:04:53,260 --> 05:04:56,160 So I guess I'll just look to the council to see who wants to make the motion. 3261 05:04:56,700 --> 05:04:57,740 I have the order that they're showing. 3262 05:04:57,740 --> 05:04:58,260 So. 3263 05:04:59,260 --> 05:04:59,960 Yes, we're a Pasco. 3264 05:05:03,600 --> 05:05:11,140 Thank you, Madam Mayor. So just a little bit of quick background for those that might be watching. 3265 05:05:12,240 --> 05:05:19,600 I think several of us were approached some time ago by representatives of line. 3266 05:05:20,680 --> 05:05:24,880 and indicating that they have there in our joining cities, 3267 05:05:25,200 --> 05:05:26,760 in agencies surrounding Kirkland, 3268 05:05:27,160 --> 05:05:31,600 a baffle wouldn't build red men and now we're just starting a program in Bellevue. 3269 05:05:33,760 --> 05:05:38,260 And, you know, saying that now Kirkland is kind of in a donut hole, right? 3270 05:05:38,500 --> 05:05:42,820 And so they'd like to start conversations with us about introducing 3271 05:05:42,820 --> 05:05:48,700 micro mobility options here to our city and then they followed that up with a letter to the council. 3272 05:05:48,700 --> 05:05:52,360 I believe yesterday or the day before with their interest. 3273 05:05:52,860 --> 05:05:54,700 And so, based upon that letter, 3274 05:05:55,260 --> 05:05:57,440 that official letter from line 3275 05:05:58,310 --> 05:06:03,320 feel like it's prudent talking with W Ameri Black 3276 05:06:03,320 --> 05:06:05,860 and Council Member Arnold feel like it's prudent 3277 05:06:05,860 --> 05:06:12,020 to offer LRM so that we can look at this option. 3278 05:06:12,320 --> 05:06:13,540 This isn't approval of it, 3279 05:06:13,760 --> 05:06:15,040 it's just look and explore options 3280 05:06:15,040 --> 05:06:22,260 of how we might consider micro-evolubility program in Kirkland, and we know that E-bikesake 3281 05:06:22,260 --> 05:06:28,020 D has been a big conversation in the community, not just in Kirkland, but across the region 3282 05:06:28,020 --> 05:06:35,160 in state, and that has to be, you know, continued to be part of any option and evaluation 3283 05:06:35,160 --> 05:06:37,100 that we look at. 3284 05:06:38,160 --> 05:06:41,420 So with that, I'll make a motion and we can have any discussion. 3285 05:06:41,420 --> 05:06:59,060 Motion for the Council to approve a legislative request memo asking the city manager to explore options for allowing the shared micro mobility program, including eSputters, eBliders, and eBike, such as the one operated by Lyme within the city with corresponding attention to writer and community safety. 3286 05:06:59,740 --> 05:07:00,160 So I can't. 3287 05:07:03,980 --> 05:07:07,720 I don't know who that was. I'm going to give it to Black just because he was loudest. 3288 05:07:08,720 --> 05:07:13,340 Motion's been made by Councilmember Paskel second by Deputy Mayor Black. 3289 05:07:13,340 --> 05:07:15,320 any discussion? 3290 05:07:20,780 --> 05:07:22,740 All those of you ever please say aye? 3291 05:07:23,260 --> 05:07:23,820 All right. 3292 05:07:24,320 --> 05:07:25,000 Any opposed? 3293 05:07:26,320 --> 05:07:28,140 Motion carries seven zero. 3294 05:07:28,800 --> 05:07:29,860 Thank you, gentlemen. 3295 05:07:31,020 --> 05:07:31,840 All right, next. 3296 05:07:35,900 --> 05:07:36,140 Okay. 3297 05:07:37,060 --> 05:07:39,800 I want to give some background on this. 3298 05:07:40,020 --> 05:07:48,900 So I'm proposing this LRM to explore helmet requirements for high-speed micro mobility devices, such as e-bikes, 3299 05:07:48,900 --> 05:07:55,740 because our responsibility is really to protect public safety, especially for our children and teens. 3300 05:07:57,260 --> 05:08:02,020 E-bikes are, as everyone knows, E-bikes are becoming very common in our community. 3301 05:08:02,900 --> 05:08:11,100 And the data is speaking quite loudly amid 2020's six national analysis by Trovita, 3302 05:08:11,300 --> 05:08:17,680 which is a very legitimate data data set governed by the U.S. major U.S. health systems 3303 05:08:17,680 --> 05:08:23,060 across the country found that emergency room visits for e-bike and e-scooter injuries among 3304 05:08:23,060 --> 05:08:32,180 children and adolescents increased by 671 percent between January of 2023 and May of 2026. 3305 05:08:33,080 --> 05:08:37,380 And many times it really is the lack of helmets that causes these injuries. 3306 05:08:37,820 --> 05:08:45,000 As an example from June 2025 to June 2026, a major hospital in Texas treated 3307 05:08:45,700 --> 05:09:00,160 127 pediatric patients out of which 99 of them and this was for them being on injuries caused by bicycles or e-bikes or e-scooters 78% of them were not wearing helmets. 3308 05:09:00,920 --> 05:09:05,140 So I understand you know helmets definitely cannot prevent every injury. 3309 05:09:05,760 --> 05:09:12,580 But I do think that that's the simplest and most effective way for us to reduce the risk of potential head injuries. 3310 05:09:12,580 --> 05:09:24,440 Therefore, I don't think that this is not like a request to get approval for this, but really to explore options on whether or not this is something we could do in the city of Kirkland. 3311 05:09:25,280 --> 05:09:41,900 So, I move that we approve a legislative request memo asking staff to provide options for requiring the use of bite helmets when operating a micro mobility device, like bicycles, E by C scooters, etc., in Kirkland. 3312 05:09:41,900 --> 05:09:49,540 I heard council member Tim Chison on the second. So it's been moved by councilman Pram 3313 05:09:49,540 --> 05:09:56,040 second by council member Tim Chison to move forward. The helmet LRM, is there any discussion? 3314 05:09:57,160 --> 05:09:58,060 Help, er, drop it to me. 3315 05:10:00,500 --> 05:10:07,020 Just one quick comment. I really appreciate Council Member Prem bringing this forward. 3316 05:10:08,020 --> 05:10:17,660 And it is a topic that was discussed by me and Council Member Arnold and Council Member Pascal and connection with the shared 3317 05:10:17,660 --> 05:10:24,880 the microambility as well. Just know that we were thinking about this topic too and one of the reasons we 3318 05:10:24,880 --> 05:10:32,320 worded that error in the way we disc, we were hoping that that might, that that error in my 3319 05:10:32,320 --> 05:10:37,880 come back with some suggestions for how we might look at helmets too but this is the more this is the 3320 05:10:37,880 --> 05:10:43,120 clear and more direct way to do it and I think it makes a ton of sense and I'm going to support it. 3321 05:10:43,900 --> 05:10:46,040 Thank you. Councillor Timchissen? 3322 05:10:47,260 --> 05:10:51,040 I'll support that. I support this LRM. I think one of the interesting legal questions 3323 05:10:51,040 --> 05:10:56,320 that will emerge is if a civil infarction, a non-criminal civil infarction is issued, 3324 05:10:56,700 --> 05:11:02,700 whether that civil infarction is issued to the writer or the parents. Thank you. 3325 05:11:02,700 --> 05:11:05,060 Thank you. Councillor Hurtell. 3326 05:11:07,160 --> 05:11:15,460 Just a quick comment. Generally on LRMs, we've been pretty open to these 3327 05:11:15,460 --> 05:11:22,840 because it's just starting the conversation. But for helmets and while there should be no argument 3328 05:11:22,840 --> 05:11:29,920 about riding a helmet, wearing a helmet when you're riding a bicycle bike, e-scooter, etc., the question 3329 05:11:29,920 --> 05:11:34,360 on requiring this and enforcing it. 3330 05:11:34,700 --> 05:11:36,680 And all this gets very complicated, very fast. 3331 05:11:36,880 --> 05:11:42,100 And I am conscious of staff capacity, even in looking 3332 05:11:42,100 --> 05:11:44,740 at this for an L-R-M. 3333 05:11:45,480 --> 05:11:49,020 And so I think it's an important issue. 3334 05:11:49,760 --> 05:11:51,980 I'm not sure it's one that I'm supportive 3335 05:11:51,980 --> 05:11:53,900 of moving on immediately. 3336 05:11:54,340 --> 05:11:56,380 And so in the interest of prioritization, 3337 05:11:56,540 --> 05:11:58,560 I'm going to be voting against this. 3338 05:11:58,560 --> 05:12:02,180 but please, everybody out there, parents out there, 3339 05:12:02,280 --> 05:12:04,120 make sure that you're riding helmets. 3340 05:12:04,500 --> 05:12:06,800 I'm just not sure about city accident at this point. 3341 05:12:07,060 --> 05:12:07,760 Thank you. 3342 05:12:08,180 --> 05:12:08,820 Thank you. 3343 05:12:09,600 --> 05:12:10,340 Anyone else? 3344 05:12:11,740 --> 05:12:13,720 All right, the questions I'm motioned to move 3345 05:12:13,720 --> 05:12:16,900 for the helmet LRM made by Casper Prim, 3346 05:12:17,040 --> 05:12:18,680 second by Casper Prim, chimchism. 3347 05:12:18,900 --> 05:12:20,960 All those of you who are pleased to say aye. 3348 05:12:21,700 --> 05:12:23,520 All right, all those opposed? 3349 05:12:24,060 --> 05:12:24,300 No. 3350 05:12:25,280 --> 05:12:26,780 Well, she carries six one. 3351 05:12:29,110 --> 05:12:29,350 All right. 3352 05:12:29,350 --> 05:12:31,170 Holmes point over Lake. 3353 05:12:31,270 --> 05:12:32,770 Kelsmerfield, come with. 3354 05:12:33,250 --> 05:12:34,190 Thank you, Madam Mayor. 3355 05:12:34,430 --> 05:12:36,570 And this is a since Councilor of Pascals 3356 05:12:36,570 --> 05:12:39,670 presented the other LRM, I hope he doesn't mind if I 3357 05:12:39,670 --> 05:12:41,890 present this one just to share the workload. 3358 05:12:43,010 --> 05:12:46,270 Is the joint proposed LRM by Councilor of Pascals and I? 3359 05:12:46,710 --> 05:12:48,650 I won't go into much detail about it because I think 3360 05:12:48,650 --> 05:12:50,690 we're all fairly familiar with these issues. 3361 05:12:52,350 --> 05:12:54,210 Those two issues are in here. 3362 05:12:54,410 --> 05:12:57,570 You probably all read the language, but just for those watching 3363 05:12:57,570 --> 05:13:03,770 at home, what they both relate to the homes point overlay, which is a part of the neighborhood 3364 05:13:03,770 --> 05:13:08,790 in the Finhill neighborhood, right? It's a portion of the Finhill neighborhood for those 3365 05:13:08,790 --> 05:13:15,910 who may not be familiar. And the two, there are stricter rules within the homes point overlay 3366 05:13:15,910 --> 05:13:21,790 about property usage and development. And so these are to address some of the issues that we've 3367 05:13:21,790 --> 05:13:28,130 hearing repeatedly from community members that live in the homes point neighborhood of Finn Hill. 3368 05:13:28,830 --> 05:13:34,830 The first is, I've brought this up several times over the past few years since we've adopted 3369 05:13:34,830 --> 05:13:40,690 the Arno Tree Code, and that is allowing some more flexibility for tree removal for homeowners 3370 05:13:40,690 --> 05:13:51,770 in the homes point neighborhood. There are folks who I've heard from who are incurring a lot of 3371 05:13:51,770 --> 05:13:57,110 trees that are, you know, damaging their home or having, you know, other issues with the trees 3372 05:13:57,110 --> 05:14:00,950 are healthy and so they're currently not allowed to remove them in the homes point overlay. 3373 05:14:01,350 --> 05:14:07,670 They do not have the ability to remove either two or four trees like property owners do 3374 05:14:07,670 --> 05:14:12,110 in the rest of the city. So I'd like for us to look at options for more flexibility there. 3375 05:14:12,450 --> 05:14:17,570 Or we'd like to look at that. And the second is related to lot coverage and lots 3376 05:14:17,570 --> 05:14:22,370 I think we're all at least, you know, somewhat familiar with the 3377 05:14:22,370 --> 05:14:26,010 homesquite overlay being more restrictive in this and essentially the larger the 3378 05:14:26,010 --> 05:14:32,410 lot that you have, the higher, or the the the last lot coverage 3379 05:14:32,410 --> 05:14:36,030 are allowed, right, on larger properties. So for properties that already have an 3380 05:14:36,030 --> 05:14:39,070 existing home that may be a large home, even if they have a very large 3381 05:14:39,070 --> 05:14:42,930 property, are not allowed to split that lot in order to facilitate 3382 05:14:42,930 --> 05:14:48,530 are more desperately needed housing development in our community. And this target 3383 05:14:48,530 --> 05:14:53,810 specifically flexibility in those cases in the homes point or really area for 3384 05:14:53,810 --> 05:14:57,930 missing middle housing because we know that that's what we need more than, you know, 3385 05:14:58,050 --> 05:14:59,870 to make make mansions that we see everywhere. 3386 05:15:00,000 --> 05:15:11,920 So, it's very targeted specifically at looking at ways that we could be more flexible with allowing missing mental housing and lots flooding in order to allow that to happen in the homes point overlay. 3387 05:15:13,180 --> 05:15:22,500 So, I will make the motion. We move to approve an LRM to explore options for two potential code amendments related to the homes point overlay. 3388 05:15:22,500 --> 05:15:29,620 The first would involve expanding the ability to remove trees in the homes point overlay outside of development scenarios. 3389 05:15:30,280 --> 05:15:35,620 For instance, increasing the ability to remove trees to better align with the lounges in the rest of the city, 3390 05:15:36,060 --> 05:15:41,960 where a property owner can generally remove two to four trees per year depending on the size of the property. 3391 05:15:42,740 --> 05:15:51,040 The second code amendment would involve loosening one or more development standards in the homes point overlay to facilitate the development of middle housing. 3392 05:15:51,040 --> 05:15:56,220 The options that are explored should consider whether these amendments can be integrated into 3393 05:15:56,220 --> 05:16:02,220 the projects that are currently on the 2026-2028 planning work program. 3394 05:16:02,400 --> 05:16:02,500 Sorry. 3395 05:16:04,920 --> 05:16:05,320 Thank you. 3396 05:16:05,420 --> 05:16:06,740 It's been moved by Councillor Fell. 3397 05:16:06,740 --> 05:16:07,160 Come on. 3398 05:16:07,160 --> 05:16:08,400 Second by Councillor Paskill. 3399 05:16:08,440 --> 05:16:09,160 New forward. 3400 05:16:09,480 --> 05:16:11,900 The heart and point overlay LRM. 3401 05:16:12,120 --> 05:16:12,840 Councillor Paskill. 3402 05:16:15,410 --> 05:16:15,870 Thank you. 3403 05:16:16,410 --> 05:16:16,730 Councillor Fell. 3404 05:16:16,950 --> 05:16:18,950 I'm going to get a great job of explaining that. 3405 05:16:19,210 --> 05:16:24,090 The only couple things I just want to add and emphasize is that these things are 3406 05:16:24,090 --> 05:16:30,070 are issues that we've heard from the community members, these aren't just wild ideas that both 3407 05:16:30,070 --> 05:16:34,950 of us came up with, but these are things, conversations that have been having over the years, 3408 05:16:35,150 --> 05:16:38,870 I'm sure you've heard to from other community members about this. And then second, 3409 05:16:39,770 --> 05:16:47,550 we were very specific with staff that we wanted these to be very targeted and really wanted, and 3410 05:16:47,550 --> 05:16:53,030 that's what that lesson is there, is to try to find a way to see if if we're targeted, 3411 05:16:53,030 --> 05:17:00,330 It can maybe add it to an existing work program item rather than creating a whole another set of work for the 3412 05:17:00,330 --> 05:17:09,750 PIN department because we know that they're stretched in, that there's a lot of different priorities when we wanted to basically just kind of append on to an existing process. 3413 05:17:10,710 --> 05:17:17,890 And so that's our hope that staff will look at that and see what would be their appropriate way of considering these amendments. 3414 05:17:18,610 --> 05:17:19,030 Thank you. 3415 05:17:19,230 --> 05:17:19,830 Thank you. 3416 05:17:20,270 --> 05:17:20,830 Anyone else? 3417 05:17:22,210 --> 05:17:27,790 I do appreciate that you recognize the potential impact to the planning work program. 3418 05:17:27,990 --> 05:17:31,970 I thought that was a nice ad to the LRM, so thank you for that. 3419 05:17:32,730 --> 05:17:33,570 Any further discussion? 3420 05:17:35,410 --> 05:17:37,170 All those of favor please say aye. 3421 05:17:38,690 --> 05:17:38,730 Aye. 3422 05:17:38,730 --> 05:17:38,890 Aye. 3423 05:17:39,630 --> 05:17:40,490 Any opposed? 3424 05:17:41,330 --> 05:17:42,470 Motion carries 70. 3425 05:17:44,050 --> 05:17:45,510 All right, well done, everyone. 3426 05:17:46,310 --> 05:17:49,050 City Manager, anything else from you, 3427 05:17:52,630 --> 05:17:53,450 you're muted. 3428 05:17:53,970 --> 05:17:55,650 I feel very, yeah, it's wasn't. 3429 05:17:55,790 --> 05:17:58,490 I will reschedule the council policies or procedure discussion. 3430 05:17:58,930 --> 05:18:03,250 Are there any other calendar changes from the council before we finish? 3431 05:18:06,920 --> 05:18:11,380 See, now I just want to add my thanks to the IT staff and the clerks office team 3432 05:18:11,380 --> 05:18:15,040 and everyone who made this virtual meeting go so well and a huge thanks to the council members 3433 05:18:15,040 --> 05:18:19,380 for your flexibility and your patience as we get it and you guys will have a great job. 3434 05:18:20,300 --> 05:18:26,580 So thank you. Thank you everyone. Enjoy your recess and we are adjourned.