[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[0:05] We'll have a few of you here. We're actually, a few of you are probably strutting, so we'll
[0:09] have a good day's rolling here, and we'll have a meeting, a whole meeting, for Tuesday,
[0:12] so if you'd like to support us, we'll call it all.
[0:17] Stop checking.
[0:23] Check.
[0:23] Here.
[0:24] All in the back.
[0:25] Here.
[0:33] All right, we'll send it to you tomorrow.
[0:36] Oh, I'm here.
[0:39] I've heard about it for a little bit of minutes, and I'll be July 23rd and August 12th.
[0:46] Second, I'll share with you some of the comments or questions.
[0:51] You can see none of those in favor of the committee.
[0:53] And as you can see, aye.
[0:55] Aye.
[0:56] Aye.
[0:56] Aye.
[0:58] Aye.
[0:58] Aye.
[0:58] Aye.
[0:59] Aye.
[1:03] Aye.
[1:04] Aye.
[1:07] Aye.
[1:08] So, you know, we'll review from our consultant, and I'll just execute with it, and we'll execute
[1:13] the survey, and then we'll kind of resolve some of the analysis on the background.
[1:18] So, that will run it over to staff and carries it in the lead to the survey.
[1:24] Well, good evening.
[1:25] So, it was just over a year and a half ago that we began talking about the community survey,
[1:31] since the last one took place in 2018.
[1:34] And so then we, I hope that, while we're at our committee, interviewed several consultants and it would suggest last September we had the council or the contract to MTC Institute.
[1:50] So with me here is Robert E. Bob, the consultant from MTC, and he's going to share the consultant with you.
[1:59] Thank you all for the opportunity to be here.
[2:02] I'm just going to start by talking a little bit about this slide.
[2:07] Those not familiar with the spirit of IT and the film paradise we see in film business
[2:11] since then.
[2:12] We need to really focus a lot of the community survey, business survey, and all types of
[2:18] transportation services and all types of services since the late 1990s really.
[2:23] And it's the last 14 years of surveying more than 3.6 million people over 1,000 different
[2:30] cities and counties across the different parts of the country.
[2:36] Tonight we're going to talk briefly about the purpose of ethnology and why we do this
[2:40] for the whole of the stress of the state and how it's the leader of the top.
[2:45] The one that's going to be satisfied with the percentage of city services is the support
[2:49] of the development of the city.
[2:55] We have some other findings based on unique questions that can be asked related to the
[3:00] community and the private album, sunrise, and big, lots of new questions.
[3:08] There are a few of them that I don't know why I don't know what those goals are.
[3:13] For us, we never should have done it.
[3:15] We should have done it on the basis of a jacket that says,
[3:17] and has a passion to stay civil citizen.
[3:19] We hear from a lot of people as individuals,
[3:23] around the community, sometimes with the wrong question.
[3:27] So we make them in the city for wanting to engage with the community
[3:30] and know how to hold the right people in,
[3:33] whether they're values, what's involved with them.
[3:35] And now in terms of work for development around the city,
[3:38] then we want to share those moments
[3:41] to the communities to help you.
[3:42] Otherwise, the system is just pure by itself.
[3:46] We don't have that to compare things very good on the end of the line.
[3:52] So as Eric said, we've used the survey by mail and online, and they introduced it actually this year.
[3:58] The goal was 400 communities here, which would have given us a plus or minus 5% margin of error.
[4:04] Your community is very engaged, very willing to share their opinions and the response to
[4:10] When we set out, we had a world-wide number of 705, I think it surmised the fact that it's really phenomenal in our business.
[4:20] And you can see it reduces the margin of the barriers across the last 3.7%.
[4:25] It also has additional 1100 or so.
[4:28] We're not part of the random survey, but share their needs to keep people aware of the small amount of opportunities shared.
[4:34] It's a very engaging community and it's possible to lead on a council to understand being open
[4:42] to new problems like this slide.
[4:47] Let's give you an idea of the next exercise we're going to get here by the end of the
[4:51] afternoon.
[4:52] Just to be a little bit more specific,
[4:56] this is a map that shows the rentals.
[4:58] We don't share any of the services under the same confidential, but we do go down
[5:04] a lot of them, which shows that they're wanting to deal with their own responses.
[5:10] They don't share any of the visual of this policy as much as I thought.
[5:16] Only if you're the resident that honestly, 14% have been with the city or living in the city
[5:23] for more than 21 years or so.
[5:25] I think that's a good way to break down there.
[5:29] of people from five years would last by 10 and some by next month.
[5:36] All age groups were also lower than 10, I've seen here.
[5:40] I'll have a slide.
[5:45] I'm going to look at SAS and actually perception and see
[5:47] so it's not going to be the one next month.
[5:51] So this is the only job right now here.
[5:53] I'm wanting to kind of let you know
[5:57] on how this is going to happen.
[5:59] Responses may vary from slide to slide,
[6:02] and in this particular case, the dark blue bees
[6:05] responds to the question, responds to say it,
[6:11] and bring it as essence.
[6:13] Like you, this is buddha, a pretty sad routine, this case,
[6:17] and low in energy and low on the floor.
[6:23] I'm in the PNH Red Cross.
[6:26] You can see near at, really,
[6:30] if you have almost 100% of the response
[6:34] statement that has the place of the medical
[6:36] assessment to the good, you can average state
[6:39] if that's the place to raise children, that's the place that you provide
[6:43] phone. You can see the moment of the low average of four,
[6:47] We're picking it up out there as a city of new recognition,
[6:50] thinking about a conversion development.
[6:52] Next slide.
[6:55] There's a lot of sections that have a background.
[6:58] We have the quality of life at the top.
[6:59] We have a procession called safety
[7:01] and representation of the city on the top.
[7:04] We're going with almost unanimous
[7:07] of being very satisfied, almost almost satisfied.
[7:10] In this case, being the gray is the neutral.
[7:13] So keep that in mind,
[7:14] to be one of the cases that, in addition to law and officials, we will get a problem
[7:20] in cities, land, or land. That is subject to some dissatisfaction. You can see, but there's
[7:26] also that third of all percent bias that's going to be backed up by some of them. You
[7:32] do these trying to move the email system that's been filed in the web. It really
[7:37] don't make the unhappiness of happening. It would suggest to you that it's easier
[7:41] to educate the community that they can be more aware of instead of being on issues and
[7:47] know them from the neutral to satisfy their own needs.
[7:51] Which helps to understand just this one.
[7:54] When you're on a tree, there's not a thing about how long you're planning to grow and what not.
[8:00] You have 31% of your spot is basically growing.
[8:05] It's better to think that I don't have to be, I think it is neutral.
[8:09] That means it's not being fatted as an opening for the city through various means of opening.
[8:14] Additional dialogue or information, that is something you have to follow in this issue.
[8:20] It's not going to be about the next slide.
[8:23] It's not going to be about the major categories of the city services.
[8:27] It's not going to be about the opening of the city.
[8:29] It's not going to be about the opening of the city.
[8:35] It's not going to be about the opening of the city.
[8:40] related to the kind of issues like, yeah, our attention to human organs is a lot of
[8:45] things, and you know how much that means.
[8:48] The overall satisfaction of the data is a very high level.
[8:51] Pro-baking is not in all of those things.
[8:53] I fall into the character of the city government.
[8:56] It doesn't matter where you are, where you're at,
[8:58] because there's government rules in addition to that.
[9:01] They've got to come to you on the next slide.
[9:06] Satisfaction with experiencing or acting with the county or the big addition in the
[9:09] case of city government departments.
[9:16] Really, it's our year of results from the decision-making system.
[9:23] Satisfaction with a satisfied and satisfied and long
[9:28] -term significant overall satisfaction
[9:32] with the
[9:38] development and the city.
[9:39] That was a major topic on the slide.
[9:42] So we included some apps, but so recently we kind of understand what there is in
[9:46] the city if you're a spot in the government.
[9:49] As you're measuring the level of support for different types of development, this is a
[9:54] residential development that we have now set up today, so I just want to point out between
[9:58] those rows where you know where we are, do you see quite a bit of assistance in our
[10:05] positions in the area of our town, which is sitting in the opposite corner of the
[10:18] Next slide.
[10:21] I think I saw a lot of this in Fairfield.
[10:23] It's a type of commercial development in front of Washington.
[10:28] You can see casual dining.
[10:29] They tell a specialty that is an auditory entertainment department.
[10:33] I think she can add these.
[10:34] They are the highest quality and apartments in the town.
[10:37] A lot of this is surprising.
[10:40] There are a lot
[10:49] of this in Fairfield.
[10:50] I think it's interesting.
[10:51] I think I saw a lot of this in Fairfield.
[10:53] There are a lot of this in Fairfield.
[10:58] The number of voices is the same based on what happened in
[11:09] the other communities.
[11:10] I think in my practice this way, say, city things in your city,
[11:14] this area before, how long you've seen this type of response,
[11:19] this type of response is a very, very positive impact.
[11:22] In most cases we've seen several areas that they should live in.
[11:26] To visit there, you normally see that people,
[11:38] So, we looked at, asked about areas of the community, how do you think there were all
[11:42] ways of satisfaction we should have in comparison to this to live, to see 98.9% of the community
[11:49] in the community.
[11:49] So, that one leads out of just the yellows across averages.
[11:56] We do these for 18.4 months to take care of gay developments, make sure that we're not
[12:03] measured against them,
[12:07] particularly for our children.
[12:13] Planting to the region consists of inspecting the
[12:18] Wisconsin, the Illinois, and so the Missouri,
[12:23] Iowa.
[12:31] They're not, these are not necessarily in size, these are, this is based on the
[12:37] area.
[12:38] Yeah, so just like to see a national survey that might have been done by the state,
[12:43] it's not taking down necessarily comparison to a life-size stage.
[12:55] See every category, every new level.
[12:58] And I may not know if it's a specific one,
[13:01] maybe a meeting that marks the mirror.
[13:05] See if you are seen in the back in some places in the back of the field.
[13:10] So we're going to just value see the city tax model in the piece.
[13:15] That's really an important piece.
[13:17] We're really going to see that very often.
[13:20] We're going to set the satisfaction by you see it.
[13:25] That tells me that you're telling the story.
[13:27] It doesn't necessarily mean life in taxes,
[13:30] but it tells me that you're telling the story about where the city is
[13:33] and where the investment is going.
[13:36] You're telling the community what you're doing with the tax dollars.
[13:38] And they respond very, very well.
[13:42] Leadership of elected Christians, you can see there.
[13:45] Well, in this day and age, you don't know what you're seeing.
[13:53] Obviously, there's a culture here that you have the development of the
[13:56] council and the staff where you're getting information,
[14:00] you're communicating, you're validating your senses.
[14:03] And they all respond very well to these responses.
[14:09] The satisfaction of being a panel is to say services needed, needs to be sponsored by
[14:14] the overall quality and priority of non-services to the road maintenance department.
[14:19] Even though road maintenance is at a low 60% of all satisfaction,
[14:24] the satisfaction is higher than it must have been.
[14:30] And I'd say the fact that considering quite a few of those are more of a blindness
[14:37] but there is to see whether the relief impact road maintenance
[14:51] So it's a lot of refining, it's a lot
[14:58] of information about how.
[15:00] Power evidence. Early units. How
[15:05] they get their information. City, you can see the top.
[15:09] Creator of the city's website. Both the newspaper and the city event.
[15:15] Weekly calls and e-mails are all there.
[15:22] That's specifically about all amenities that respond to legacy.
[15:27] in the middle of the city,
[15:32] and getting an option so you can go first and see by far.
[15:38] I mean, sick partners who are at the hospital, and in the way you can always know about that
[15:45] thing they call it. It's still responsible, and I know some of them are sick and others.
[15:54] It's a lot of work.
[15:57] The authority of residents today is sitting down
[15:59] while the needs of additional and low-income side
[16:01] are as the side must.
[16:03] We're going to bring in community.
[16:05] I need to see a small 60% of the population
[16:08] and the community needs to be more
[16:11] of a growing side as the side must.
[16:14] I want to follow up with a sense of income
[16:15] so that we can be more responsible.
[16:18] If that's not a lot of work,
[16:20] we're going to do it with the state
[16:20] and I want our community to spend more money
[16:23] they do it safely. I suppose it's a small degree of authority that we didn't like this year 68% of the
[16:33] response in a green and strong environment out in the city. It's been a long year that I would
[16:42] say that I would suggest that not only being safe but also a lot of times you're doing things
[16:51] and you could be in movements and maybe mitigate the side of the issue,
[16:55] but part of it is part of the balance of maybe shifting the topic with successes
[16:59] and to project out of the piece of the even one, what you're doing,
[17:04] I need to figure out on that issue.
[17:09] That's not as fast as the overall value that it could possibly receive from your parts.
[17:15] It's being very satisfied, it's 0.5 percent satisfied at 0.5 percent.
[17:20] quite tied into them among these additional tasks that we just didn't have.
[17:27] Quite the same as still at 76% in the satisfied and dissatisfied,
[17:33] categorical, and that's the base of the enemy and other
[17:38] subordinate.
[17:41] So I'm sorry, I imagine we need all of these,
[17:43] but I think we're supposed to have presidents very satisfied
[17:48] for the wrong perceptions that the city and the services that they're providing
[17:53] And you can see here, all of these parameters
[17:55] that are tiny is 90% higher.
[17:59] Really, it will be very significant as well.
[18:04] And you have to vary from place to region
[18:07] and to any nostalgia in the environment.
[18:10] And personally, all major parameters
[18:12] are city services,
[18:18] not any questions.
[18:23] Thanks for the overview.
[18:24] It's nice to get some positive feedback over on.
[18:29] and I think they did really well.
[18:31] It's a little better though, but it's nice to get back to.
[18:36] I know there's a whole multitude of great comments
[18:39] in the back, and just about it's all in my second.
[18:42] I'll add to the chat GTP paper for the adjustable.
[18:46] We're not going to go through all of it.
[18:47] Here on the floor, we're going to read our
[18:50] pre-made events version that we can't stop
[18:52] but 15 or 20 pages in a bit.
[18:56] A lot of white written comments,
[18:57] but it was certainly interesting
[18:58] I think they did some of this stuff.
[19:00] So it was only after Washington
[19:01] that they saw all the lives of the person.
[19:03] Yeah, I mean, first things I want to thank everybody
[19:06] on the panel.
[19:08] Hope it's a pleasure to work with you.
[19:09] Hope it's a pleasure to work with you.
[19:13] Robert, I've worked with that, and especially with Kerry.
[19:17] I just do the little thing, and Justin,
[19:19] don't talk to Kerry.
[19:21] Thanks to everybody that did that
[19:23] and all the different committee members
[19:26] and giving the substantive feedback and different inputs
[19:31] that we got from everybody, that was just fantastic,
[19:34] just got to work.
[19:35] Like what's been seen, though, is that,
[19:37] instead of getting asked before,
[19:40] quote, quote, we're about to assume,
[19:42] since we've had the time,
[19:45] if people put online and there was a raise,
[19:48] that's the nerves,
[19:49] and you're going to give us kind of all the other data
[19:51] to the most people, probably,
[19:53] to be asked twice a year and set it out with them.
[19:56] Like a person who can make a tube,
[19:58] get prevention and caretans,
[20:00] and thicknesses, or whatever.
[20:05] To me, honestly, when you've done that before,
[20:08] we've done it all with responses.
[20:11] Statistically, nobody might have been in the order
[20:13] and they've all combined with those of others.
[20:18] But those are, it's tough to say,
[20:20] it's those that are supposed to be addressed here.
[20:24] It's not possible for them to manage things.
[20:25] So we might have said 3,000, but it's not going to be the response of the new people.
[20:32] We added online, we wanted them first, we will respond, we get social media ads, and we do have that
[20:38] accessible to people so we don't have to worry about where it's going to go.
[20:44] But the website wasn't even going to apply to the new people.
[20:48] We may not believe it's the buy-in-the-sick-year-old kind of thing, but it's not going to be the buy-in-the-sick-year-old kind of thing.
[21:00] It's the type of summary of what we call the dollar and a hand in the sponsored vehicle
[21:07] that they're going to see.
[21:08] I didn't carry this in my sport.
[21:13] And it isn't the group
[21:16] that can be so many things to do with it.
[21:19] But I think it would be any of this.
[21:24] And it's sort of that.
[21:25] Sometimes I could be like that, but I think the times of last year are usually
[21:35] again in four versions.
[21:40] When I was in the company I asked, can you get a copy of my presentation
[21:43] and the company?
[21:44] Yeah, I'd give you that, I think you should.
[21:46] It's nice to meet you.
[21:47] Okay, perfect.
[21:48] Good to have you.
[21:50] Good to have you.
[21:51] It's me.
[21:52] It's a little early to get up.
[21:54] We're going to end the video at this time.
[21:57] There's a bit of a problem with that.
[21:58] Please call me.
[21:59] We'll get away with that.
[22:00] I'm sure we can work.
[22:00] I think you'll have time to call.
[22:03] Call me if you can.
[22:04] Okay.
[22:06] Thank you, Mike.
[22:07] You're welcome.
[22:07] We'll ask you to find out.
[22:23] Good job.
[22:24] We appreciate it.
[22:27] Carrie, I respond to that.
[22:28] I appreciate it.
[22:30] I appreciate it.
[22:30] I appreciate it.
[22:31] I appreciate it.
[22:32] I think the results are bigger by your efforts.
[22:35] So, on your columns, it's like, you know, how much you're going to get.
[22:43] So, we're going to come to all our environment that we needed,
[22:47] aside, aside with the public first statistical version.
[22:51] So, on that,
[22:55] we wanted to express some disappointment
[22:58] and there's disappointment in the news graphic again.
[23:01] And actually, I'm reminded, because I saw all our women,
[23:03] and a lot of them will hold it up.
[23:06] And yet again, his graphic is published in an article
[23:09] with all of us having actually had a meeting here.
[23:16] So once again, I believe the public is not in properly.
[23:20] As far as there are reactions to the actual survey,
[23:24] but against the policies of, or another kind,
[23:26] or were you mind to hear some of our reactions tonight?
[23:30] No, I mean, speaking, discussing the survey,
[23:36] What is the most policy there is?
[23:38] Great.
[23:39] Well, in the future, I'll have a commentary on the central industrial residential, self-bus,
[23:46] or becoming more intensive industrial, I think.
[23:49] I think this survey will be very well-designed.
[23:54] I think this is going to give us a lot of the data we need for decision-making from before.
[23:59] So, thanks again for coming here and for all your work and to Terry and the rest of the staff.
[24:08] Thank you.
[24:11] I
[24:14] think this is a real helpful framework.
[24:16] Grab the card and pull it down.
[24:18] I think this is a draw on the strategy of what's important to some of our initiatives,
[24:25] especially when we first met it out here on, you know, the new toy that was tax-based
[24:29] over the coming years, but what is developing it all the way down.
[24:35] I'm going to question the bottom part, you know, with what development could be.
[24:56] My question is, that's a new graph, but how can we get to find this
[25:02] and it could be made a presentation or maybe be able to find out if there is something,
[25:08] something like this, and invite residents in and hear what the results were that might
[25:15] be worthwhile for people to say, hey, this is an opportunity.
[25:21] We'll learn a little bit about what happened in the survey.
[25:24] Come on in and we'll make the presentation for you.
[25:27] It seems like something that they did best to do, so how do you get the word out of it?
[25:36] I think we'll certainly go and bring it to them.
[25:39] I think we'll turn this into something that people know we can.
[25:43] There is a survey of the results.
[25:46] It's no secret that we have a survey of people who are interested in seeing the results.
[25:51] The majority of them have not done this.
[25:53] I don't think they'll use their app or even if they jumped the round about it.
[25:57] It's been worried by a couple days.
[25:59] also think we didn't really change the substance of this type of speaking.
[26:04] On my meeting the last one, where we didn't change the substance was in the back of the
[26:09] book that actually.
[26:11] There's so much information in here.
[26:14] There's so much information in there.
[26:17] Guys, instead of saying, we'll serve our government with one option.
[26:24] That's something like this, some of the business reports that the citizens are going to get
[26:29] some kind of quick summary that inspires them to go through the scene and that's an
[26:37] option that's going to help them.
[26:42] Certainly the results of the new vision is probably working.
[26:47] As we mentioned,
[26:50] you have a one
[26:56] -year-old time for a 10-hour shift,
[27:10] which is a different
[27:11] thing to how we use it.
[27:12] So
[27:35] we'll definitely take that comment back to the staff and figure out the best way to
[27:39] accomplish that.
[27:40] It's hard to meet people that come here, come here and meet, it's hard to meet people
[27:47] that are really interested in their children with this kind of thing.
[27:50] It also may not have seen me a job enough, I guess, so we can certainly draw more attention
[27:56] to what they're able to comment on and substance and what they're able to serve
[28:01] people.
[28:01] I'll
[28:05] just like, I didn't say one thing, one comment that allowed me additional comments
[28:09] by him.
[28:11] It's an early range that you can use to consolidate some of the numbers.
[28:15] One comment for anyone listening, one of the major things that came out of a survey,
[28:20] great comments, was that we committed to the city, county, and state jurisdictional
[28:25] confusion.
[28:27] Certainly, that's due to a lot of construction fatigue and three straight years of construction
[28:33] back to the 543 interchange, and back to our own, and we're now embarking on the world with all the closer road and all of our own projects.
[28:45] Also, the issues noted in the survey account is related to the status of actually the roads that are owned by other jurisdictions, but the survey results seem to indicate that
[28:57] People will sign the most simply responsibility for those roads in the city, has to literally
[29:02] continue to go through the issue of contact with the caravan's policy bill.
[29:07] I don't know how we can even get the word out better, but also the roads are going to
[29:11] be complaining about our cars.
[29:14] I've seen that in other jurisdictions, but I would suggest an answer to that.
[29:19] I have not, with a lot of people, know that that's the issue of working with
[29:23] of sensitivity. We can frame some questions that will have a career computer upgrade,
[29:31] such as actually destroying this, which a lot of people are doing, which are working a lot
[29:37] of ways through the boss room, especially some of them, and in the state, where people
[29:43] want to save my alias a month or even a day, so there's a lot of spending that concerns
[29:49] America, not about the cities, but it's a bit about the talent and the specificities
[29:55] So, in other ways, I already featured on that issue.
[30:01] I mentioned a couple of people, too. It's interesting to see how many comments there were of schools.
[30:10] And the confusion that the council somehow has with additional schools and the task increases.
[30:18] Well, where the schools, I thought, are pretty stable, but they relate somehow to the council.
[30:26] The council has a jurisdiction on what's really to be done on the law.
[30:33] So, you know, there's some, you know, there's some written in that there,
[30:37] but there's some indication that there's clear something about it.
[30:55] You know, as you do the learner talks,
[31:00] there's those relative questions
[31:02] that really needed to be asked, ultimately, that we didn't do.
[31:08] So there's still some questions that we haven't
[31:16] been very, very well.
[31:17] It doesn't say anything, but
[31:24] it's sort of looking at it down there and it's kind of close to how it looks down at the end of this point.
[31:42] Maybe we're going to see, we're still going to have a study of hygiene information.
[31:48] Submission here on the box.
[31:53] It's also a little bit of the S&P box demo.
[31:57] It was a savings.
[31:59] Any other comments?
[32:01] All the history?
[32:12] I'm going to stop that, I need some of you to stop this, raise it down a bit, but we're
[32:21] a little 57% said it will increase this, so it's getting interesting that, you know,
[32:29] placing them but not necessarily increasing, which kind of leads me to think of any
[32:34] We need to have a lot of businesses or activities that are going to be long.
[32:42] Because I'm sitting on my own.
[32:45] You already knew what was going to be the best of this.
[32:48] Some things that have been delivered, how it's going to sound,
[32:52] have not been used, but if you're looking for more venues to have an agreement,
[32:59] have excitement in these things.
[33:01] It's going to go away as soon as we get to our next step.
[33:06] It's going to take about the same scenario as experience.
[33:11] Thank you, Robert, for taking the time to speak.
[33:14] Thank you.
[33:17] Thank you for that information.
[33:19] Any last questions or feedback?
[33:26] Thank you.
[33:33] Thank you.
[33:34] So she was probably not hearing.
[33:35] That isn't an excellent segue into what I would offer
[33:39] on this second hand that I would suggest you
[33:42] to the members of the council.
[33:44] As it was noted when we got this process earlier
[33:50] this year and even into late last year,
[33:53] the results from these surveys,
[33:56] both random and non random, are excellent.
[34:01] And they're also been served
[34:04] as sort of the whole market basis for the next strategic land process and then we can take
[34:11] off into our businesses. That was communicated by probably any family within the organization.
[34:18] So to the extent that any of you were unable to make it through the five voluminous reports
[34:26] that were distributed to the police in the whole grand area, that made it through
[34:30] two, that was the last thing we did in Canada, three normal groups to come through the cell.
[34:34] That would encourage you to continue to make notes mentally or through AI or any other fashion
[34:42] of that matter. You need to continue to organize your thinking and your prioritization
[34:48] relative to what you're seeing and what you're hearing from the survey results.
[34:53] Because as we get into second quarter, third quarter next year we're going to be looking to
[35:00] We double our effort to set the strategic plan for all, so that we have a five-year roadmap to guide future efforts and future investments
[35:08] and to keep it built on these great results that we're hearing about tonight.
[35:13] Our current strategic plan is scheduled to run through 2025, so we've got a little time.
[35:20] We've made a lot of progress in approaching the plan, which was covering the years 2022 through 2025.
[35:27] But it will serve us well to give that second strategic plan to form a role for the world.
[35:36] Organized and ultimately developed, and I think the results that they're seeing here
[35:42] and some of the great feedback that we've had over the course of these policy discussions,
[35:49] and some of these vision issues
[35:53] that have now emerged.
[35:56] So just now we have that discussion.
[35:59] session,
[36:05] it's not sharing on the Sunday there, no more questions, comments, you can
[36:13] move on.
[36:14] That's the meeting.
[36:19] On our next agenda item for this evening is setting up a little old pilot workshop.
[36:30] It's been a while since the review decided me if we should spend a couple of minutes
[36:33] It's like,
[36:37] give me your two prints for time, or I can stop you short.
[36:42] So we're looking at where we're at now.
[36:43] That's where we get the community survey results.
[36:46] Next month, we're scheduled to be discussing the syndicates master plan.
[36:51] We'll be a open house and baby in this space.
[36:54] Later this month.
[36:56] Don't look at those whether you're pregnant or going to the hospital.
[36:59] Next month, we're looking at attention to giving the public more time to absorb
[37:03] with those planning for the throat problem council in October.
[37:08] They'll have to be on the 17th.
[37:11] This one, November 8th with a plan on something,
[37:15] that'll be a, I'm sure, a really good presentation
[37:19] for our state intermediates.
[37:22] And then, 7th or 4th Street,
[37:24] and then the 8th, you got the 8th,
[37:26] and the 2nd district graduate programization discussion.
[37:31] So that's the plan for now to get to the end of the year for me.
[37:35] The digital items we need to be on came out.
[37:37] Mr. Jones, thank you very much for pointing out to me from staff.
[37:42] of this loop yesterday, but it's adding policy discussion on the plans for makeshore ride
[37:51] on that long road.
[37:53] Aden project just wrapped up on Zevlar, as well as Captain Pernick Park, which is setting
[38:01] the bird legs of that three-thousand project in one loop, makeshore ride in that long
[38:06] road, heading west to the valley to intercede.
[38:10] As the council will recall, we have awarded a contract last month to Barry Smith of Foot
[38:17] Design and Services along Big Show Drive in Mughorn Road, and we're going to be working
[38:23] to have the consultant come back in the future committee in the whole meeting, last week
[38:28] we needed a number, or at least a number, at time frame towards the end of the year
[38:32] to help drive a policy conversation and hopefully a decision on the third design
[38:37] I'm not sure, so we have those dots in the wrong, so to speak, in advance of publicly
[38:43] accrediting those projects, and really, it functions.
[38:46] So that'll be added to the calendar, you'll be seeing, and that's about to happen.
[38:51] That'd be nice to have, that
[38:56] as well, why don't we have a
[39:06] tag in the middle, we'll
[39:07] see what we can all do, and that'd be nice too, for one, especially, I'll tell
[39:14] those two get under the same big feedback while we're actually using the process.
[39:20] I want to give you the other feedback for future items. I know this scale is
[39:24] broken against the end of the year, but we're meeting beyond this.
[39:29] I don't know if they've been correct or it's always been since I'm
[39:35] an entrepreneur.
[39:39] I also said that if we're over time, we'll be able to create
[39:42] a policy that we're going to revisit a couple of times. So when she's
[39:46] to discuss such a reverberating expert.
[39:54] Thank you guys.
[39:56] Seeing none, we'll observe motion to adjourn.
[39:59] Total.
[40:02] Motion to second.
[40:03] All those in favor can say aye.
[40:04] Aye.
[40:05] Any votes?
[40:06] And we're adjourned and we'll be adjourned in two minutes.
[40:09] All those in favor.