1 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:36,540 Good evening, everyone. Thank you for joining us today for the city council meeting Tuesday, October 14th, 2025, and let the record show all council members are present. And with that, I am going to invite the 4-H members up to the podium to lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2 00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:50,820 Please put your right hand over your heart and join us for the Pledge of Allegiance. Ready? Begin. 3 00:00:50,820 --> 00:00:58,840 I pledge allegiance to the front of the United States of America and to the Republic for 4 00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:05,720 which it stands one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. 5 00:01:07,400 --> 00:01:08,220 Thank you. 6 00:01:13,370 --> 00:01:14,990 Thank you more, Bay 4-H. 7 00:01:15,090 --> 00:01:19,070 It is national 4-H week, so I think we're going to be hearing from them in a few minutes at public 8 00:01:19,070 --> 00:01:19,470 comment. 9 00:01:19,890 --> 00:01:21,010 Thank you for joining us. 10 00:01:21,770 --> 00:01:25,890 With that, I will turn over to our city attorney, Mr. Stack. 11 00:01:26,810 --> 00:01:29,510 Good evening, Mayor Councilmembers and members of the public. 12 00:01:29,970 --> 00:01:34,770 The City Council did meet in close session two times since the last regular meeting. 13 00:01:35,470 --> 00:01:40,330 The first closed session meeting was on Monday, October 13th, and during that item, they 14 00:01:40,330 --> 00:01:45,270 discussed two real property negotiation matters, and one anticipated litigation matter. 15 00:01:45,750 --> 00:01:47,990 No reportable action was taken under the Brown Act. 16 00:01:48,950 --> 00:01:51,270 For that closed session agenda or meeting. 17 00:01:51,270 --> 00:01:56,930 meeting. And the second closed session meeting was this afternoon to the October 14th and 18 00:01:56,930 --> 00:02:02,250 the council met to discuss the city manager recruitment and no reportable action was 19 00:02:02,250 --> 00:02:09,750 taken under the ground act. Thank you, Mr. Hurstek. With that, we will move into merit council 20 00:02:09,750 --> 00:02:15,390 member reports, announcements and presentations. I'll kick off and pass it down in a minute. 21 00:02:15,390 --> 00:02:21,130 I have a shout out to the Maritime Family Fund day and the group down there. 22 00:02:21,250 --> 00:02:22,230 What a great event. 23 00:02:22,570 --> 00:02:24,370 I think all of us attended. 24 00:02:24,570 --> 00:02:27,390 I'm pretty sure I saw other council members down there. 25 00:02:27,710 --> 00:02:30,430 We kept our distance, but it was a great event. 26 00:02:30,610 --> 00:02:33,610 It felt like back in the day when we used to have rock and ram. 27 00:02:33,610 --> 00:02:36,330 It was very community and family oriented. 28 00:02:36,570 --> 00:02:40,530 And it was just a really nice afternoon and a great effort by that group down there. 29 00:02:40,670 --> 00:02:41,050 Thank you. 30 00:02:41,050 --> 00:02:57,690 So this Sunday from 2 to 4, Council Member Landham and myself are going to be hosting a town hall meeting at the community center, and I'm sure she'll share a few words on it when it gets down to her, but we'll be talking all things about the waterfront and Moral Bay. 31 00:02:58,830 --> 00:03:04,010 I just got back Friday from the League of Cities, California Cities Conference. 32 00:03:04,010 --> 00:03:06,750 Thank you to the city for sending me. 33 00:03:07,050 --> 00:03:10,090 It was a great opportunity to network and resource. 34 00:03:10,350 --> 00:03:15,130 There were a lot of vendors at the Expo who have a lot of products and 35 00:03:15,130 --> 00:03:19,350 things that the city uses in regards to infrastructure maintenance, 36 00:03:21,310 --> 00:03:25,150 administrative resources and things as well as attending many sessions. 37 00:03:25,870 --> 00:03:32,350 I found it was a little challenging because each time slot there was five different sessions to choose from. 38 00:03:32,350 --> 00:03:37,430 So it was very difficult to pick, but most of them I attended was on small cities and good governance. 39 00:03:38,090 --> 00:03:41,830 So hopefully I'll be able to utilize that information in my job here. 40 00:03:43,050 --> 00:03:45,650 Tomorrow night, we have our public works advisory meeting. 41 00:03:46,450 --> 00:03:57,090 And tomorrow night at the public works advisory meeting, there will be an update from a slow cog on the Morbay Estuary Climate Resiliency Transportation Plan. 42 00:03:57,090 --> 00:04:02,270 As well as October 22nd in Las Osas, where there will be a workshop. 43 00:04:03,850 --> 00:04:05,790 And, getting back there, huh? 44 00:04:06,730 --> 00:04:08,890 And so I hope everybody I'll be able to attend that. 45 00:04:09,010 --> 00:04:19,010 The city is still working, our public works director is working with slow cog to try and schedule a date here, and as soon as we can confirm that we will share that with you. 46 00:04:19,850 --> 00:04:22,270 And with that, I will pass it to my left. 47 00:04:24,170 --> 00:04:30,090 Thank you Madam Mayor and thank you all for being here and thank you to our 4-H members for an excellent job 48 00:04:30,090 --> 00:04:35,210 I'm a big fan of fan of that United States flag and you did it justice. So thank you for that 49 00:04:36,990 --> 00:04:39,450 Like the rest of my council members. I've attended several meetings 50 00:04:39,450 --> 00:04:45,990 I'll be short and just say that it's a privilege to sit up here and be your public servant and represent you on the city council 51 00:04:45,990 --> 00:04:50,310 I want to hear what you have to say if you've got any input or feedback for me 52 00:04:51,070 --> 00:04:53,510 My email address is on the city website. 53 00:04:54,090 --> 00:04:56,050 I also have a newsletter that I send out periodically. 54 00:04:56,350 --> 00:05:00,750 So please feel free to contact me, either via my cell phone. 55 00:05:01,430 --> 00:05:02,990 My number is on my card. 56 00:05:03,690 --> 00:05:05,490 And I just want to hear from you. 57 00:05:05,970 --> 00:05:06,990 We're here to serve. 58 00:05:07,230 --> 00:05:07,590 Thank you. 59 00:05:09,380 --> 00:05:10,140 Chair pro Tim. 60 00:05:12,780 --> 00:05:13,300 Thank you, Mayor. 61 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:18,680 I wanted to remind the public that we have a joint CFAC, 62 00:05:18,900 --> 00:05:20,620 which is our Citizens Finance Committee, 63 00:05:20,660 --> 00:05:22,140 which we're going to be discussing tonight. 64 00:05:22,140 --> 00:05:32,740 Council meeting on October 21st at 3 p.m. at the Vets Hall, that's here in this building and we're going to be discussing revenue opportunities for our city and community. 65 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:40,900 I also recently attended the nonprofit roundtable that was conducted by the Moral Bay Chamber of Commerce. 66 00:05:41,660 --> 00:05:48,860 I was able to hear a myriad of guest speakers and was invited to speak on tonight's agenda item. 67 00:05:48,860 --> 00:05:54,660 I'm just questions with regard to the Grant Committee process as well as the special events 68 00:05:54,660 --> 00:06:00,260 policy and fees conversation that will be coming up in the near future. 69 00:06:01,060 --> 00:06:05,240 It was just a great conversation, got a lot of feedback and some things to consider for 70 00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:05,740 this evening. 71 00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:12,880 I also attended the fundraiser for the Moro Bay Maritime Museum at the Moro Bay Yacht Club. 72 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:16,520 The volunteers did an incredible job there. 73 00:06:16,520 --> 00:06:22,020 They raised a really great amount of money and put a lot of work into it. 74 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:26,360 This is the Maritime Museum, of course, is something that draws a lot of visitors 75 00:06:26,360 --> 00:06:29,460 and it serves our community as well, so that was wonderful. 76 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:36,680 I want to remind people that we do have a trick-or-treat event on October 25th from 235-3. 77 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:43,380 This gives the kiddos an opportunity to go along around the businesses and pick up some treats 78 00:06:43,380 --> 00:06:48,980 and costume contests and things like that, so and that is it for me. 79 00:06:53,530 --> 00:07:12,650 Hello, I attended the San Luis County Housing Trust Fund building strong foundations a seminar that was put on by our very own council member Eccles, and it was really fun to see him in his real job. 80 00:07:12,650 --> 00:07:26,390 And I think he don't count on him as running for or going for a city manager job or anything like that because he's doing great at his real job. 81 00:07:28,030 --> 00:07:30,050 And he put on a great panel. 82 00:07:30,050 --> 00:07:35,830 there were the directors of People's Self-Help Housing and Haslow Housing Authority of San 83 00:07:35,830 --> 00:07:46,590 Lois. There was an architect from Firm and San Lois and also San Lois, the city of San 84 00:07:46,590 --> 00:07:52,150 Lois, the best-boz community development director. And they all spoke and it was really interesting. 85 00:07:53,710 --> 00:08:01,850 Good job. And I also attended, he and I both also attended a visit Moral Bay Board meeting. 86 00:08:02,310 --> 00:08:08,110 That was the first time I had done that, where they were talking, they had a presentation 87 00:08:10,930 --> 00:08:15,830 for Christmas lights, for the holiday lights. I don't know where they're going with that, 88 00:08:15,950 --> 00:08:18,430 but they did receive a presentation of that. 89 00:08:18,430 --> 00:08:23,670 I attended the WAMPAC meeting and the Harbor Advisory Board meeting. 90 00:08:24,490 --> 00:08:31,410 At the Harbor Advisory Board meeting, I learned that we have the healthiest fishing stocks in 91 00:08:31,410 --> 00:08:37,690 the world, some of the healthiest fishing stocks in the world, and that the federal government 92 00:08:37,690 --> 00:08:42,790 is indicating that they want to help because they feel like we're no longer competitive, 93 00:08:43,810 --> 00:08:46,890 and they want to change that, help change that. 94 00:08:46,890 --> 00:09:15,050 And so that sounded like really good news for our Fisher people and also at that meeting the Harvard Director reported out that the Army Corps of Engineers is responsible for the infrastructure at the harbor that they have that they built, which is a lot of the revetments and I would think even the peers and a lot of that infrastructure. 95 00:09:15,050 --> 00:09:22,830 So that's also what I heard when I went to DC and I reported out on that just if anyone 96 00:09:22,830 --> 00:09:23,330 remembers. 97 00:09:24,190 --> 00:09:34,930 And I think that they told me at the time that they had tons of money, it was a problem 98 00:09:34,930 --> 00:09:36,110 getting it out. 99 00:09:37,230 --> 00:09:43,310 And so I encouraged our Harvard Department to really pursue that and our staff to really 100 00:09:43,310 --> 00:09:47,630 they pursue that because they claim they are responsible for it and in fact if we even 101 00:09:47,630 --> 00:09:54,990 did work on it, it sounded like it would be a problem because it's their infrastructure 102 00:09:54,990 --> 00:09:57,930 and we shouldn't be doing that, that's the way I understood it. 103 00:09:59,110 --> 00:10:08,750 I attended the County Water Resources Advisory Council meeting where we heard the update 104 00:10:08,750 --> 00:10:14,390 from the county to do the decal, doing the decal feasibility study. 105 00:10:14,830 --> 00:10:18,470 They have hired Corolo engineering to do the study. 106 00:10:18,990 --> 00:10:25,210 And Corolo has identified, originally identified 22 sites for decal for the county. 107 00:10:25,910 --> 00:10:33,370 And they narrowed it down to 12, and surprise, surprise, Moro Bay is ranked very high on that list. 108 00:10:34,430 --> 00:10:45,590 We had two sites, actually they did three different sizes of diesel in Moro Bay, like a small 109 00:10:45,590 --> 00:10:52,110 medium and large, and then they had an additional site, they called a sterile bay. 110 00:10:52,890 --> 00:10:58,350 And that is the dog beach area where Cuyukus's outfall is. 111 00:10:58,350 --> 00:11:07,930 And, yeah, that's the town hall, yeah, come to the town hall, all things waterfront, 112 00:11:09,230 --> 00:11:14,870 and you can, you know, the mayor and I will tell you what we know, and you can ask questions 113 00:11:14,870 --> 00:11:18,370 and give us suggestions, and we'd love to see you there. 114 00:11:22,010 --> 00:11:28,410 Yes, good evening. I also attended quite a few meetings, the IWMA, the planning commission 115 00:11:28,410 --> 00:11:32,850 meeting, the Harvard advisory board meeting, the waterfront master plan meeting. 116 00:11:33,170 --> 00:11:35,010 I like going to meetings because I learn a lot. 117 00:11:36,270 --> 00:11:37,070 No, I'm serious. 118 00:11:37,810 --> 00:11:44,230 I have a hard time sometimes in gathering all this information and the advisory boards which 119 00:11:44,230 --> 00:11:51,590 are vital part of our governmental structure here in Moral Bay gives me the guidance and 120 00:11:51,590 --> 00:11:56,510 the knowledge for myself to do a better job up here as your city council person. 121 00:11:56,510 --> 00:12:00,930 The other thing I want to convey here is the Friends of the Moral Bay Harbour Department, 122 00:12:01,090 --> 00:12:09,430 which is a 501-C-3 has just donated a couple more trash cans along the harbor walk leading 123 00:12:09,430 --> 00:12:10,490 up to Target Rock. 124 00:12:12,610 --> 00:12:15,630 They're the blue ones that you see over there by Coleman Park. 125 00:12:15,630 --> 00:12:21,490 We just ordered two more of them for the harbor department to help out with trash picked 126 00:12:21,490 --> 00:12:22,330 up over there. 127 00:12:22,330 --> 00:12:30,270 and then the other thing is we've just made a commitment to print the 2026 128 00:12:30,270 --> 00:12:35,810 tide books for Moral Bay. So those will be forthcoming here in about a month. 129 00:12:36,510 --> 00:12:39,150 And then the Friends of the Moral Bay Harbour Department is going to hold a 130 00:12:39,150 --> 00:12:44,890 movie night at Rosa's Landing between Rosa's Landing and the Libertine at 131 00:12:44,890 --> 00:12:52,110 night and it's going to be a free movie and it will be I think the same day as the 132 00:12:52,110 --> 00:12:54,490 the lighted boat parade at the month mistaken. 133 00:12:54,850 --> 00:13:00,510 So that would be a fun event to see a movie out there at the Embarcadero. 134 00:13:01,230 --> 00:13:02,010 So that's all I have. 135 00:13:02,530 --> 00:13:03,230 Welcome everyone. 136 00:13:07,890 --> 00:13:08,470 Thank you everyone. 137 00:13:08,890 --> 00:13:12,430 We did forget a couple other events that are coming up just to throw it out there. 138 00:13:12,570 --> 00:13:17,090 I know it was mentioned and I would encourage anyone to go to the Morbay Chamber website or 139 00:13:17,090 --> 00:13:20,990 visit Morbay that's got all the events listed with the downtown Trunker Treaty. 140 00:13:21,410 --> 00:13:25,170 We would forget if we didn't remind everybody about the witches' paddle. 141 00:13:25,170 --> 00:13:29,850 So that is on Saturday, October 25th. 142 00:13:30,090 --> 00:13:33,710 So that will be just before we meet again, so make sure you make it down there to participate 143 00:13:33,710 --> 00:13:34,370 or watch. 144 00:13:35,310 --> 00:13:38,130 With that, I will turn it over to City Manager Lucer. 145 00:13:39,390 --> 00:13:39,850 Thank you. 146 00:13:39,950 --> 00:13:41,630 Good evening, Mayor and Council and community. 147 00:13:41,930 --> 00:13:43,330 Just a couple of things tonight. 148 00:13:44,010 --> 00:13:50,330 We are continuing with the City Manager recruitment, moving forward, applications are being reviewed 149 00:13:50,330 --> 00:13:53,810 and interviews are scheduled for no mid-November on that. 150 00:13:53,810 --> 00:14:06,710 That, I did want to just briefly talk about last week we had a water main break from an outside contractor and that required the city to issue a precautionary water boil notice. 151 00:14:07,450 --> 00:14:19,190 We've had some comments about concerns, I guess, about people not getting information perhaps regarding that notice and I just wanted to briefly talk a little bit about two noticing opportunities. 152 00:14:19,190 --> 00:14:42,570 One is the reverse 911 system, and it's used to provide emergency information that is an opt-in system, and that can be found on the county website under public alerting, slow county public alerting, you can sign up for that with your cell phone, if you've got a landline, if those are still out there for some folks that sometimes comes automatically. 153 00:14:42,570 --> 00:14:42,730 Exactly. 154 00:14:43,170 --> 00:14:48,450 There's also a new alert system called alert slow, and that provides important information 155 00:14:48,450 --> 00:14:54,790 less significant usually than the reverse 911, such as severe weather, major highway closures, 156 00:14:54,990 --> 00:14:55,670 that sort of thing. 157 00:14:55,990 --> 00:14:59,730 And again, that can be found on the slow county website under public alerting. 158 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,980 So you are not automatically signed up, but you can opt in. The city of Morbay is also investigating the potential of perhaps looking at our own alert system for city-only issues. And that water, that precautionary water boil notice did come down pretty quickly, additionally. Just also to bring to your attention. We're pretty excited. The Morbay fire department of the last few years has received approximately 100,000 159 00:15:29,980 --> 00:15:34,620 dollars for battery-powered extraction tools, also known as the Jaws of Life. 160 00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:40,800 And we were alerted earlier this week that the California Office of Traffic Safety will 161 00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:45,360 be featuring Moro Bay in their annual 2025 report regarding these grants. 162 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:46,940 So that's nice for the City of Moro Bay. 163 00:15:47,680 --> 00:15:51,280 I am going to turn it over to Public Works Director Greg Qualik. 164 00:15:51,340 --> 00:15:54,260 He's going to interview a couple of new city staff to all of you. 165 00:15:55,460 --> 00:15:59,140 Thank you City Manager, Luke, or thank you Mayor, members of the City Council on the Moro 166 00:16:00,520 --> 00:16:04,940 I'm very pleased to invite up our new city engineer, Nate Stong. 167 00:16:05,100 --> 00:16:07,000 Nate Stong, if you could come up to the podium. 168 00:16:07,420 --> 00:16:12,420 And just by way of short introduction, Nate studied civil engineering at Cal Poly. 169 00:16:12,660 --> 00:16:15,940 He has over 20 years experience doing civil work. 170 00:16:16,360 --> 00:16:20,640 He's worked for the cities of Placerville, where he was city engineer for six years. 171 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:26,260 He's also worked for Pismo Beach in the city of San Luis Obispo, as well as private entities. 172 00:16:26,260 --> 00:16:33,140 These Nate has a wealth of experience, I've learned quickly in the two weeks he's been here doing drainage work, 173 00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:39,400 creek work, transportation work, and the list goes on, so I'll just let Nate say a few words. 174 00:16:41,750 --> 00:16:45,370 Thanks, Greg, for that introduction, and a good evening, Mayor and members' council. 175 00:16:46,070 --> 00:16:54,770 My name is Nate Stong, and I'm super pleased to be excited to be here and an opportunity to work with the team at the City of Moral Bay. 176 00:16:54,770 --> 00:16:58,910 and leading the engineering division within public works, 177 00:16:59,550 --> 00:17:02,250 I've met each of the five staff in the division, 178 00:17:02,430 --> 00:17:05,270 and it's just a strong team that I've found so far in my two weeks. 179 00:17:06,090 --> 00:17:11,050 Looking at an extensive list of projects, very interesting projects, 180 00:17:12,690 --> 00:17:14,530 complicated value to the community, 181 00:17:15,210 --> 00:17:18,250 and I look forward to delivering projects. 182 00:17:19,330 --> 00:17:21,750 Again, I'm just so excited to be leading. 183 00:17:24,790 --> 00:17:31,870 A whole gamut of types of projects, flood control, a study of moral creek, and low lying 184 00:17:31,870 --> 00:17:37,510 areas, and things can be done there with the grant, Cal OES, I'm very excited to look 185 00:17:37,510 --> 00:17:38,070 at that one. 186 00:17:38,850 --> 00:17:45,590 Traffic and transportation issues, development review, working with developers on their projects 187 00:17:45,590 --> 00:17:52,650 and ensuring code compliance, and additions are satisfied, the FEMA side, floodplain mapping, 188 00:17:52,650 --> 00:18:03,750 And then I'm just on a general note, I see a lot of challenges coming in and typically try to treat those as opportunities so there's places we can have success my 189 00:18:06,540 --> 00:18:07,340 three minutes up. 190 00:18:09,240 --> 00:18:12,180 I think I'll leave it at that. I appreciate the opportunity. 191 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:13,680 Thank you. 192 00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:21,780 Thank you, Nate, and next I will bring up Matt Evers, Matt Evers is our Utilities Project Manager. 193 00:18:22,360 --> 00:18:29,980 This is a position that the City Council created in this year's budget to handle the backlog of water and sewer projects that we have on the books. 194 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:39,240 Matt studied, and you'll correct me if I'm wrong, ag systems at Cal Poly and also got his MBA from Cal Poly and went on to work for 195 00:18:39,240 --> 00:18:43,260 or Pappitch, I don't know the phone name of the business, 196 00:18:43,300 --> 00:18:46,020 but Pappitch, and they've actually done very good work 197 00:18:46,020 --> 00:18:47,840 for us in town, dating work. 198 00:18:48,620 --> 00:18:49,500 Matt lives in the city. 199 00:18:49,940 --> 00:18:51,720 He is the father of four children, 200 00:18:52,100 --> 00:18:53,860 so he has quite the family. 201 00:18:53,980 --> 00:18:55,620 I happen to meet them at Amorabe event 202 00:18:55,620 --> 00:18:57,780 before he had even applied for this job. 203 00:18:58,460 --> 00:19:00,280 So we're very excited to have him and Matt, 204 00:19:00,280 --> 00:19:01,160 I'll let you say a couple words. 205 00:19:01,740 --> 00:19:04,960 Yeah, evening mayor, members of council, public. 206 00:19:05,520 --> 00:19:08,200 Excited me on the team to be serving this community 207 00:19:08,200 --> 00:19:13,480 as Greg said my family lives here so I have vested interest in the success here 208 00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:18,720 and look forward to the growth and as Nate had said we have a great team there's 209 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:22,700 a lot of projects to be built a lot of improvements to be made and I'm excited 210 00:19:22,700 --> 00:19:28,340 for it and my background on the contractor side knowing how important the 211 00:19:28,340 --> 00:19:33,240 project pre-planning specification development I think will help drive very 212 00:19:33,240 --> 00:19:34,740 very good, successful projects for the city. 213 00:19:38,600 --> 00:19:39,160 Thank you. 214 00:19:42,390 --> 00:19:43,170 Thank you both. 215 00:19:43,690 --> 00:19:45,690 Welcome to the team, we're glad to have you here. 216 00:19:45,870 --> 00:19:46,210 Thank you. 217 00:19:46,730 --> 00:19:48,730 Anything else, city manager, looker? 218 00:19:49,170 --> 00:19:49,970 No, thank you. 219 00:19:50,750 --> 00:19:54,310 And do we have any updates from any of the subcommittees? 220 00:19:55,510 --> 00:19:55,750 No. 221 00:19:56,630 --> 00:19:57,270 Thank you. 222 00:19:58,090 --> 00:20:00,610 With that, we will move into public comment. 223 00:20:00,910 --> 00:20:02,310 I do have a few speaker slips. 224 00:20:02,510 --> 00:20:05,290 I'm going to start with our 4-H Club first this evening 225 00:20:05,290 --> 00:20:06,830 and invite them up to the podium. 226 00:20:06,830 --> 00:20:07,750 You have three minutes. 227 00:20:07,750 --> 00:20:08,830 Good 228 00:20:27,420 --> 00:20:31,040 evening mayor, City Council and the great community of Morabe. 229 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:33,160 My name is Case. 230 00:20:34,120 --> 00:20:37,560 Thank you for the opportunity to let us know about the 4-H. 231 00:20:37,980 --> 00:20:40,920 Us week was National 4-H week. 232 00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:48,660 We would like to let you know Morabe has a very active 4-H club with 30 members and 9 adult volunteers. 233 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:56,540 Morabe 4-H club meeting meets the first Tuesday of the month 30 p.m. 234 00:20:56,540 --> 00:20:59,120 at the Mono Moral Grinch Hall, 235 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:06,740 for each is the largest use of element in the program in the nation, 236 00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:10,260 for each motto, to make the best better. 237 00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:18,000 Did you know there are over, there are 60 million 238 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:25,680 alumni and 4-H. Moral Bay 4-H Club currently has projects in leadership, sewing, cooking, garden, 239 00:21:25,680 --> 00:21:31,540 and beef, sheep, swimming, poultry, small pets, and animals, scrapbook, floral design, 240 00:21:31,880 --> 00:21:32,600 and mind dancing. 241 00:21:35,730 --> 00:21:45,350 4-H welcomes youth ages from 5 to 19 years old, and what the 4-H's stand for are head, 242 00:21:45,590 --> 00:21:47,010 heart, hands, and health. 243 00:21:48,390 --> 00:21:54,450 You can email more of A4-H at more of A4-H Club at Yahoo.com for more information. 244 00:21:54,450 --> 00:21:56,950 Thank you members of the council. 245 00:21:57,950 --> 00:22:01,530 And I would ask if the club leader has anything she wants to add to that. 246 00:22:02,230 --> 00:22:05,170 And thank you, Tammy Haas, for leading this 4-H club. 247 00:22:05,170 --> 00:22:09,790 I've been a proud part of 4-H for over 30 years, so thank you all for being here. 248 00:22:09,870 --> 00:22:11,230 We appreciate it and 249 00:22:17,020 --> 00:22:19,380 they have homework to do with that. 250 00:22:19,540 --> 00:22:20,920 I will invite up Linda Winters. 251 00:22:21,100 --> 00:22:22,640 That's the last speaker slip I have. 252 00:22:22,820 --> 00:22:25,700 Public comment will be open to the general public after Ms. Winters. 253 00:22:40,780 --> 00:22:42,600 That is a tough act to follow. 254 00:22:44,320 --> 00:22:48,960 Good evening, Mayor, Council, City, Staff, and the Chiefs. 255 00:22:49,340 --> 00:22:58,480 I was originally going to only report about the Family Fund day where the Moral Bay Lions helped to serve almost 500 hot dogs. 256 00:22:59,980 --> 00:23:12,580 The Memorial Service for John Weiss and last night's Monday night dinner that returned to being held exclusively here in this city. 257 00:23:12,580 --> 00:23:20,640 building where we served 73 people attended and we served 97 meals. 258 00:23:21,260 --> 00:23:26,300 We did successfully beat the rainstorm by only a matter of minutes. 259 00:23:27,020 --> 00:23:38,000 When I got home in enough time to feed my cats and myself and I took a little power nap to be awakened by a tornado warning on my phone. 260 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:41,080 My first reaction, who's scamming me? 261 00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:50,000 And then I realized it was real and that some of the folks that live in mobile homes were truly the most vulnerable. 262 00:23:50,780 --> 00:23:55,940 You might all know that I've been a long time advocate to the mobile home residents. 263 00:23:56,460 --> 00:24:01,960 A lot of them have my name and number and about half of them called me wanting to know what they should do. 264 00:24:01,960 --> 00:24:11,120 I will remind them all, stay calm, stay away from windows and have an emergency kit ready. 265 00:24:11,980 --> 00:24:15,260 I also reminded them this important info. 266 00:24:16,360 --> 00:24:23,840 The time to prepare for an emergency is before the emergency, not during the emergency, 267 00:24:24,580 --> 00:24:25,120 right, chief? 268 00:24:29,060 --> 00:24:30,680 But here's the good news. 269 00:24:30,680 --> 00:24:35,180 the creek didn't overflow because we also had flash flood warnings. 270 00:24:35,880 --> 00:24:37,380 That was another warning. 271 00:24:37,960 --> 00:24:41,260 My new roof didn't leak and it didn't blow off. 272 00:24:42,720 --> 00:24:47,500 I haven't had much sleep in this last 24 hours. 273 00:24:48,060 --> 00:24:52,420 So if you see me nodding off, please give me a gentle nudge. 274 00:24:53,140 --> 00:24:54,860 And I think that's all for now. 275 00:24:55,040 --> 00:24:59,680 I'll see you at the town hall meeting on the 19th. 276 00:24:59,680 --> 00:25:02,280 my teeth, if not before, thank you. 277 00:25:03,380 --> 00:25:06,820 Thank you, Linda, and thank you for that reminder. 278 00:25:07,020 --> 00:25:11,700 I think we're all a little roomy today after that all night long, and I would just do a shout out. 279 00:25:11,760 --> 00:25:14,280 I see our shift from our fire department here. 280 00:25:14,440 --> 00:25:17,220 Thank you all to our public safety police, fire and harbor. 281 00:25:17,900 --> 00:25:21,660 I know it keeps all of you up, so thank you for the job you do for us. 282 00:25:22,400 --> 00:25:25,000 Public comment is open for items not on the agenda. 283 00:25:34,230 --> 00:25:38,430 Council staff, I just come by every once in a while to tell you how much I appreciate 284 00:25:38,430 --> 00:25:44,170 your work. You guys are working very well together. You seem to respect one another. I think 285 00:25:44,170 --> 00:25:49,870 there's a variety of opinions up there. And staff, I couldn't say enough about staff as 286 00:25:49,870 --> 00:25:55,910 well, super happy with our staff right now. I just want to take about you all the time 287 00:25:55,910 --> 00:25:58,110 and I think you're doing a great job. Thank you. 288 00:25:58,110 --> 00:25:59,070 Hello 289 00:26:07,230 --> 00:26:12,810 everyone, Nicole Dorfman and I am here tonight representing React Alliance. 290 00:26:13,430 --> 00:26:22,750 We are a local grassroots nonprofit whose goal is to educate the public about the impacts 291 00:26:22,750 --> 00:26:30,810 of offshore wind energy and so in that vein I am here to share an event that we are having 292 00:26:30,810 --> 00:26:38,890 Next Saturday, October 25th, Shindig Hard Cider in Slow has graciously offered to host 293 00:26:38,890 --> 00:26:44,850 us for a wonderful evening of music with Dante, Marsh and the vibe setters and be in the 294 00:26:44,850 --> 00:26:45,210 hive. 295 00:26:45,290 --> 00:26:48,350 If you like to dance, if you like good music, please come out. 296 00:26:48,790 --> 00:26:56,970 There'll also be some burgers by the eat gas food truck and mini donuts by Sugar Lips. 297 00:26:56,970 --> 00:27:01,910 We'll have information table there, and I think it's just going to be a whole lot of fun. 298 00:27:02,330 --> 00:27:08,050 So I hope you can come out and join us, have a fun evening, and support a wonderful local 299 00:27:08,050 --> 00:27:08,650 cause. 300 00:27:09,230 --> 00:27:14,970 And speaking of React Alliance, I understand that there is some information that's come out 301 00:27:15,550 --> 00:27:16,890 about offshore wind. 302 00:27:17,910 --> 00:27:20,930 Our organization is very eager to know what it is. 303 00:27:20,930 --> 00:27:27,450 So we're looking forward to when the information can come public. 304 00:27:27,710 --> 00:27:31,670 Maybe the Council left there can give some information about that. 305 00:27:32,310 --> 00:27:34,810 But we so appreciate all your support and your attention. 306 00:27:35,410 --> 00:27:36,730 So thanks for all you do. 307 00:27:49,240 --> 00:27:51,760 Yes, it's a two o'clock, a tornado hit our house. 308 00:27:52,860 --> 00:27:56,100 Anyway, my name's Gary Johnson, a resident of Morro Bay. 309 00:27:56,380 --> 00:27:58,960 Welcome the mayor and the city council. 310 00:27:58,960 --> 00:28:04,760 So I want to talk a little about why do we need a services in Moro Bay, like the Fire 311 00:28:04,760 --> 00:28:09,520 Department, Police Department and other services, but I'd like to say recently we had a Moro 312 00:28:09,520 --> 00:28:16,080 Bay National Night Out sponsor in the Moro Bay Police in the families event was very exciting 313 00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:16,900 for all of us. 314 00:28:17,020 --> 00:28:23,000 I was so excited to see, I've been there many times, so many young people, babies and carriages 315 00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:28,020 and people, little kids two and five years old all the way up to us old people, or I would 316 00:28:28,020 --> 00:28:32,020 the old people, but me, anyway, I'm 88, so I'm old, I guess. 317 00:28:32,540 --> 00:28:38,680 Anyway, well, all that said, it's my opinion, from this event, I feel that there's several 318 00:28:38,680 --> 00:28:43,680 important groups, very important to our town. 319 00:28:43,900 --> 00:28:49,840 One is for 24-7, we've got the police department and fire department, the Harvard department, 320 00:28:50,160 --> 00:28:55,220 we've got the Coast Guard, we've got the ambulance services, and our pleasure for 24-7. 321 00:28:55,220 --> 00:28:58,920 You could be two in the morning because I can attest to that. 322 00:29:00,820 --> 00:29:03,340 So that's why we need these services. 323 00:29:03,600 --> 00:29:06,360 People come to me, why do you need these services in Morabay? 324 00:29:06,900 --> 00:29:07,860 Here's a small town. 325 00:29:08,080 --> 00:29:10,220 Well, I'm to explain into them what we go through. 326 00:29:11,240 --> 00:29:14,860 And it's an alayka, Yuka's, Cambria and Los Ososuits. 327 00:29:15,700 --> 00:29:21,440 So at any given events like in the voting, if you're kayaking, or if you're outside the 328 00:29:21,440 --> 00:29:27,140 rocks, swimming, etc., you made some type of service in medical assistance, or it may 329 00:29:27,140 --> 00:29:36,320 not be medical. So we have a residence of 10,000 people, okay? No. Been here 30 years, 330 00:29:36,700 --> 00:29:42,120 I kind of witnessed that we got maybe 15,000 or we might have 20,000. We could even have 331 00:29:42,120 --> 00:29:48,180 higher than that. So here we got services, I just mentioned, supporting 10,000 people. 332 00:29:48,180 --> 00:29:58,420 Now all of a sudden these five people services got to support 25,000, so any one of those 25,000 people that need help were going to service them. 333 00:30:00,140 --> 00:30:08,600 Most importantly, too, our taxpayers are paying for it in more of they. So, I think it's trying 334 00:30:08,600 --> 00:30:15,880 to make the non-residents, it's cost of this tax service, as I would say. And I'm not 335 00:30:15,880 --> 00:30:21,860 been an expert in this area, maybe they don't pay much or whatever. But my opinion, part 336 00:30:21,860 --> 00:30:29,160 of all this, I think that the parking fee, I need more information, because I've got friends 337 00:30:29,160 --> 00:30:36,860 that want to do the rocket. Don't do the rocket. I don't favor the one at the boat ramp 338 00:30:36,860 --> 00:30:41,280 because I go there all the time and I park my car and we look at the scenery and all 339 00:30:41,280 --> 00:30:47,320 that and have a good time. So anyway, we shouldn't tax. More of they should have an example. 340 00:30:47,820 --> 00:30:53,100 We should have a little stiffer put on our car. We don't pay any kind of parking fee. Thank 341 00:30:53,100 --> 00:30:53,280 you. 342 00:30:58,450 --> 00:31:02,390 Anyone else for public comment for items not on the agenda? Come forward, please. 343 00:31:06,020 --> 00:31:19,540 I'm Margaret Carmen, and I want to say thank you for having things like the 4-H can come here because did they just bring tears to your eyes, and I want to remember that head, heart, hands, and health should be our carpathic motto. 344 00:31:21,160 --> 00:31:26,140 And City Manager Lucca, I want to say it was really easy to sign up for reverse 911. 345 00:31:27,000 --> 00:31:31,300 I tried three times and could not do alert slow, so I probably need some help. 346 00:31:31,300 --> 00:31:38,740 But it was very easy to do reverse time one one and I'm sorry. I was five minutes late and if somebody mentioned that on October 22nd 347 00:31:39,420 --> 00:31:42,300 from 6 to 7 30 at the Nazarene 348 00:31:43,660 --> 00:31:45,840 Church in Moral Bay the 349 00:31:46,390 --> 00:31:53,220 Slow cog will have a meeting about the Moral Bay estuary climate resiliency plan and the last one they had 350 00:31:53,770 --> 00:31:59,660 All the cyclists were there and there were only myself and one other Moral Bay residents and we need you to come 351 00:32:00,560 --> 00:32:09,080 because it infects us, and we need to tell slow-cog what we would like, and not just one group of people. 352 00:32:09,860 --> 00:32:12,020 Okay, and this is what I was really going to get to talk about, too. 353 00:32:13,300 --> 00:32:17,580 I'm curious, and I mentioned this at the planning commission, but it was really kind of inappropriate, 354 00:32:18,300 --> 00:32:23,120 that the precautionary water boil notice, I'm just curious, 355 00:32:23,120 --> 00:32:31,620 If since it was another contractor, I heard it was this company hired another contractor and then all your city 356 00:32:32,740 --> 00:32:39,300 Staff time, you know, does that other company have to pay your staff time back because we talk about it is 357 00:32:39,300 --> 00:32:42,440 precious and we do pay for it and the other thing is 358 00:32:42,440 --> 00:32:50,460 Culligan closed down and didn't sell water for those days. Well, how do they go about getting reimbursed? 359 00:32:50,460 --> 00:33:02,320 So as a taxpayer, I'm just curious what happens when a contractor messes up our water and do they have to or is it just part of their contract that they don't have to do anything about it? 360 00:33:02,860 --> 00:33:09,560 And I'm going to just end with a happy note on my face about seeing those children. It was really wonderful. Thank you. 361 00:33:13,050 --> 00:33:17,130 Excuse me, Ms. Carmen. Could you tell us again at the date of that meeting? 362 00:33:18,250 --> 00:33:18,990 I didn't get that. 363 00:33:20,310 --> 00:33:29,330 Next Wednesday, October 22nd, from 6 to 730, but the Nazarene Church in Los 364 00:33:29,330 --> 00:33:32,410 Us on South Bay Boulevard. Thank you. 365 00:33:39,810 --> 00:33:46,390 Betty Winholz, I have mentioned this individually to a few people on staff and on 366 00:33:46,390 --> 00:33:53,710 council, but I think I want to say publicly that if you have not signed off on this 367 00:33:53,710 --> 00:34:00,990 this project at the Vets Hall that I hope that you won't until this staff is moved back up to the front. 368 00:34:01,710 --> 00:34:11,570 I really find it disconcerting that some staffs here and some staff isn't and I think it's unequal and I find that I don't like that. 369 00:34:12,110 --> 00:34:17,050 And so I'm hoping that you will put that in there before you sign off on it. 370 00:34:17,190 --> 00:34:21,570 If you've already signed off on it, then I think you need to do something about that and 371 00:34:21,570 --> 00:34:23,670 and get some more desks and nice chairs 372 00:34:23,670 --> 00:34:25,290 and bring your staff back up front. 373 00:34:35,660 --> 00:34:36,780 This will be pretty brief. 374 00:34:36,780 --> 00:34:38,640 I just wanted to clarify one of the points 375 00:34:38,640 --> 00:34:41,220 about the friends of the Morabe Harbor Department, 376 00:34:41,400 --> 00:34:42,380 the movie night in particular. 377 00:34:42,920 --> 00:34:45,060 It's actually planned to be on a Thursday 378 00:34:45,060 --> 00:34:46,360 before the boat parade. 379 00:34:47,060 --> 00:34:49,960 The second draw will actually have the Santa's house open. 380 00:34:50,440 --> 00:34:51,520 There's still a few loose ends. 381 00:34:51,520 --> 00:34:53,480 It's not totally cemented in, 382 00:34:53,600 --> 00:34:55,220 but we've gotten through a number of the big hurdles 383 00:34:55,220 --> 00:34:57,280 and we're super excited about that. 384 00:34:57,800 --> 00:34:59,340 We don't think we're gonna have bad Santa 385 00:34:59,340 --> 00:35:00,740 that got crossed off the list. 386 00:35:00,740 --> 00:35:06,120 maybe Elf but we're not sure Rudolph the red news right here. That's still to be determined. Thank you. 387 00:35:08,060 --> 00:35:11,700 Anyone else for public comment on items not on the agenda please come forward. 388 00:35:19,210 --> 00:35:25,880 I'm Katie Schlaught. I'm a writer and I wanted to come up and speak to you guys about the 389 00:35:25,880 --> 00:35:28,020 Memorial Elementary School. It was originally on the 390 00:35:30,900 --> 00:35:35,840 since sorry but since we skipped over it I just wanted to go ahead and give you guys a quick thanks 391 00:35:35,840 --> 00:35:39,880 for making that seriously and pursuing 392 00:35:41,060 --> 00:35:43,400 full district. Thank you guys for your hard work. 393 00:35:50,240 --> 00:35:53,080 Anyone else for public comment for items not on the agenda? 394 00:35:54,260 --> 00:35:56,220 A.G.P. are there any raised hands in the queue? 395 00:35:57,220 --> 00:36:00,160 Thank you, Marrowickson. There are currently no raised hands in the queue. 396 00:36:01,020 --> 00:36:03,660 With that, I will close public comment and bring it back to council. 397 00:36:07,500 --> 00:36:09,740 Any response on the, well, you know what? 398 00:36:09,740 --> 00:36:14,620 actually I can, there's a flyer in the back of the room regarding that town hall meeting 399 00:36:14,620 --> 00:36:15,580 if you can scan. 400 00:36:15,660 --> 00:36:21,780 It's got a UPC code on it for that climate resiliency update as well as tomorrow night 401 00:36:21,780 --> 00:36:22,920 on the P web agenda. 402 00:36:23,540 --> 00:36:24,840 SlowCog will be doing a presentation. 403 00:36:24,900 --> 00:36:30,240 I announced all that earlier and Moral Bay is currently working with SlowCog to host an 404 00:36:30,240 --> 00:36:36,820 event here tentatively looking at Wednesday, the October 29th of the Vets Hall if it's available. 405 00:36:36,820 --> 00:36:38,780 So we will keep you updated on that. 406 00:36:40,420 --> 00:36:46,540 And with that, we'll move in to consent agenda. 407 00:36:46,940 --> 00:36:53,920 And before we start that with Council's indulgence, I've been asked to poll item 6F from the 408 00:36:53,920 --> 00:36:54,640 agenda tonight. 409 00:36:54,740 --> 00:37:02,960 6F was requested to be continued at the next meeting as per Chief Watkins request. 410 00:37:02,960 --> 00:37:06,180 and that was regarding a AB permit. 411 00:37:06,880 --> 00:37:10,200 I have council support to move that to the next item. 412 00:37:10,800 --> 00:37:11,500 Thank you very much. 413 00:37:12,860 --> 00:37:16,180 That I will open public comment on items 414 00:37:16,180 --> 00:37:18,720 on the consent agenda, less success. 415 00:37:25,480 --> 00:37:28,040 Betty Winholz, I want to speak to the last one. 416 00:37:28,140 --> 00:37:31,720 I think it's letter G with regard to Los Osos 417 00:37:31,720 --> 00:37:35,600 and investigating whether or not the city 418 00:37:35,600 --> 00:37:41,660 We should engage with districts in terms of our fire to services. 419 00:37:42,500 --> 00:37:47,000 And I see how that is an incredibly great advantage for Los Osos. 420 00:37:47,480 --> 00:37:50,600 I'm not seeing the advantage for the city of Morabay. 421 00:37:51,020 --> 00:37:57,580 One is do the to the distance and with that would do, I don't know if it's just a matter of supervision or what. 422 00:37:57,720 --> 00:38:00,900 And maybe that's part of your exploration. 423 00:38:00,900 --> 00:38:21,100 but it's curious to me and so I hope when you pass this you have some parameters on what you're looking at or you just looking at everything because there's not a lot there that gives the public a chance to respond to. Thank you. 424 00:38:24,750 --> 00:38:28,010 Anyone else for public comment for items on the consent agenda? 425 00:38:29,530 --> 00:38:31,370 AGP are there and he raised hands in the queue. 426 00:38:32,750 --> 00:38:33,830 Thank you, Mary Wicksom. 427 00:38:33,950 --> 00:38:35,850 There are currently no raised hands in the queue. 428 00:38:36,610 --> 00:38:37,070 Thank you. 429 00:38:37,170 --> 00:38:40,690 With that, I will close public comment on the consent agenda and bring it back to council. 430 00:38:42,010 --> 00:38:43,790 Does anyone wish to blow off start out? 431 00:38:43,850 --> 00:38:44,850 I'm going to pull 6G. 432 00:38:45,630 --> 00:38:47,270 Does anyone want to pull anything else? 433 00:38:48,910 --> 00:38:51,470 I'd like to just pull 6C per minute. 434 00:38:51,470 --> 00:38:52,010 I 435 00:38:58,060 --> 00:39:00,200 have a motion to approve the other items, please. 436 00:39:01,580 --> 00:39:11,740 I move that we approve item six items, all other items except for C&G and the one we eliminated, 437 00:39:12,020 --> 00:39:13,380 which was F. 438 00:39:13,800 --> 00:39:14,480 Second that. 439 00:39:14,960 --> 00:39:15,820 Thank you all in favor. 440 00:39:16,120 --> 00:39:16,240 Hi. 441 00:39:16,780 --> 00:39:16,860 Hi. 442 00:39:20,720 --> 00:39:21,840 Erie's 6C. 443 00:39:22,200 --> 00:39:22,340 Yeah. 444 00:39:22,460 --> 00:39:28,000 I just like to clarify reading the staff report, Chief McCrain. 445 00:39:28,000 --> 00:39:46,920 I mean, it looks like that you're requesting to purchase a new engine and pretty much we have $500,000 of it currently and that the remainder will be $250,000 and hopefully we'll be able to gather that within the next three years. 446 00:39:47,060 --> 00:39:51,660 I just like a little bit of an explanation of where you think those funds will be coming from. 447 00:39:51,660 --> 00:39:54,420 Yeah, thank you for the question. 448 00:39:55,080 --> 00:40:00,020 So every summer when we participate in a mutual aid system, responding to fires around 449 00:40:00,020 --> 00:40:07,260 the state, we get paid for our personnel time and we also get paid for our vehicle use 450 00:40:07,260 --> 00:40:08,200 on those incidents. 451 00:40:08,840 --> 00:40:15,380 And it's done to reimburse for the wear and tear on city vehicles that, you know, occurs 452 00:40:15,380 --> 00:40:16,280 on those incidents. 453 00:40:16,620 --> 00:40:21,640 And over the last two years, and then this summer as well, we've been able to take 454 00:40:21,640 --> 00:40:25,380 that money that's set aside for that vehicle depreciation from the number of 455 00:40:25,380 --> 00:40:28,420 fires that we've went on and put that into a separate account towards 456 00:40:28,420 --> 00:40:31,100 replacing the engine that primarily goes out on it. 457 00:40:37,210 --> 00:40:38,830 You probably don't go 458 00:40:38,830 --> 00:40:42,090 far. That's the next items you also. 459 00:40:44,350 --> 00:40:48,190 Any other questions on item 60? No we can 460 00:40:48,190 --> 00:40:51,190 wait and vote on that when we finish with the next one. That's okay with you 461 00:40:51,190 --> 00:40:57,150 guys. Thank you Chief McCrain. I pulled item 6G. I've had some comments from some 462 00:40:57,150 --> 00:41:03,770 members of the community as well as myself in regards to and I speak at this evening in regards 463 00:41:03,770 --> 00:41:09,690 to the potential proposal with Los Osos providing fire services. 464 00:41:10,150 --> 00:41:14,590 I have a lot of questions and a lot of concerns. 465 00:41:15,170 --> 00:41:21,370 Right now, moral base, we approved looking at opening station two because of the standards 466 00:41:21,370 --> 00:41:24,210 of cover and the desire to have a better response time. 467 00:41:24,770 --> 00:41:31,510 You're purchasing another fire engine, we're looking at county EMS, and now we're looking at potentially providing fire service to Lasso. 468 00:41:31,650 --> 00:41:34,490 So there's a lot on the plate there right now. 469 00:41:35,150 --> 00:41:48,250 A lot of the questions that I have that are concerning and others have shared is about pension carryovers that would come from potential employees from their reduction of the level of service potentially during that transition. 470 00:41:48,250 --> 00:41:53,410 if some of our senior staffing is there, depending on what staffing were to continue on. 471 00:41:53,450 --> 00:41:59,770 If we absorb the Cal Fire, County Fire employees, are we held to there if the long-term 472 00:41:59,770 --> 00:42:02,590 employees at their level pension that we are going to assume. 473 00:42:05,970 --> 00:42:11,430 I'm not sure how they get their fire tax money. If it's through a 2-18 vote, what happens 474 00:42:11,430 --> 00:42:16,750 at the contract goes away. So a lot of, and I know it's premature, but a lot of questions, 475 00:42:16,750 --> 00:42:26,210 lot of concerns and moving forward, I would, I guess like to ask if there's an opportunity 476 00:42:26,210 --> 00:42:33,030 because I see this as kind of a long-term project that potentially there's, and I hate 477 00:42:33,030 --> 00:42:38,430 to say this, subcommittee, or some sort of communication with a couple council members 478 00:42:38,430 --> 00:42:44,910 so that we have an opportunity to participate in what this looks like for the level of service 479 00:42:44,910 --> 00:42:49,970 for our community during the process, I just feel that knowing some of these other things 480 00:42:49,970 --> 00:42:55,150 like what's going on with the county EMS services that's been going on for several years 481 00:42:55,150 --> 00:43:00,230 and we weren't really perv2 until now when it's been going on for while I don't want that 482 00:43:00,230 --> 00:43:06,410 to happen with this project. So I guess I'd entertain some response to that. 483 00:43:06,730 --> 00:43:12,730 Okay, thank you for your questions. There's a lot to unpack there. So a little bit of background, 484 00:43:12,730 --> 00:43:18,610 I was approached by the General Manager for the loss of CSD and they wanted 485 00:43:18,610 --> 00:43:24,630 some information about options available to them for fire services. They're 486 00:43:24,630 --> 00:43:29,470 currently under contract with Cal Fire. The price of that has continued to go 487 00:43:29,470 --> 00:43:33,490 up and they wanted to explore other options. They wanted to see what their 488 00:43:33,490 --> 00:43:37,790 options were for standing up their own fire department again, potentially looking 489 00:43:37,790 --> 00:43:42,190 at exploring shared services with moral basins. We are so close that we worked 490 00:43:42,190 --> 00:43:48,290 closely together and then just to evaluate this cost and what the opportunities would be. 491 00:43:48,930 --> 00:43:53,270 So we've had some very high level discussions and at the high level it looked like there 492 00:43:53,270 --> 00:43:57,210 were some values to both agencies to make it worth exploring. 493 00:43:58,330 --> 00:44:04,950 What they're asking for is, for us to put a response back, they put a formal request 494 00:44:04,950 --> 00:44:10,670 to us to evaluate what opportunities are present there and what that would look like. 495 00:44:10,670 --> 00:44:17,430 High-level discussion would be that we would provide staffing to staff their fire station and their fire engines. 496 00:44:17,670 --> 00:44:21,330 They own the station, they own the equipment, we would be providing staffing. 497 00:44:21,990 --> 00:44:29,630 During that discussion it was that we would have to hire additional personnel to accomplish that because of the staffing level they would require. 498 00:44:30,130 --> 00:44:35,130 So there's a lot that we'll have to unpack and go through to determine long-term per's obligations. 499 00:44:35,750 --> 00:44:40,890 funding they would have to fund a front for recruitment and training and outfitting of the 500 00:44:40,890 --> 00:44:47,090 so at this point it's been a high level discussion there are some 501 00:44:47,090 --> 00:44:53,990 opportunities where with shared overhead it does present the opportunity maybe to fund some of the 502 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:29,900 Government, exactly what their level of service that they're wanting, what their commitments are. But to devote a serious amount of staff time to respond to this, I wanted to present it to council. You know, a couple emails are a high level phone call. That's one thing but actually working into this and putting some effort into putting a response together. Council needs to weigh in and if they support me spending time on this. You know, based on the discussions we've had, I do feel like there are some opportunities 503 00:45:29,900 --> 00:45:35,360 for both cities. We do work closely together, we train closely together, that interoperability, 504 00:45:35,680 --> 00:45:40,400 having our personnel using the same equipment, same standard operating procedures and policies. 505 00:45:41,000 --> 00:45:48,000 There is some value to that. Having more personnel at the different stations allows for better 506 00:45:48,000 --> 00:45:53,300 coverage, move people around during times like in the summertime when we're busy. We have a larger 507 00:45:53,300 --> 00:46:00,960 full of people that we can staff stations and provide that mutual aid support and you know both 508 00:46:00,960 --> 00:46:05,340 of the communities are so closely ingrained yet we have a lot of our residents or our employees 509 00:46:05,340 --> 00:46:12,280 that live in Los Osos and vice versa so it just makes sense for that local control level but again 510 00:46:12,280 --> 00:46:16,400 I don't want to devote staff time to responding to this without council support. 511 00:46:17,800 --> 00:46:21,720 Thank you I guess that's a lot of what I'm concerned about because you have so many of these other 512 00:46:21,720 --> 00:46:27,380 things going on at the time and limited resources and we spent a lot of we, the city, you, 513 00:46:27,540 --> 00:46:31,940 your department as well as the police department and spent a lot of time looking at the potential 514 00:46:31,940 --> 00:46:40,680 of hardware merging and in the end it was an exercise to determine that path but a lot 515 00:46:40,680 --> 00:46:43,760 of time was invested into that to not utilize it. 516 00:46:43,840 --> 00:46:49,980 I'm concerned with all these other things going on and a lot of it for me is about protecting 517 00:46:49,980 --> 00:46:54,580 being on the level of service in our community, but also the funding, if they cancel the contract 518 00:46:54,580 --> 00:46:58,500 five years from now, where does that leave us with staffing that we've hired and things 519 00:46:58,500 --> 00:46:58,900 like that? 520 00:46:59,120 --> 00:47:05,540 So I just, again, I'm trying to make the point based on the other concerns that have come 521 00:47:05,540 --> 00:47:11,000 about with the EMS, the county level that I don't want to head down this path with the 522 00:47:11,000 --> 00:47:16,320 city spending a year, six months or a year working on this, that we're not part of what 523 00:47:16,320 --> 00:47:21,980 that process looks like because it does involve our citizens and that's our responsibility 524 00:47:21,980 --> 00:47:22,740 ultimately. 525 00:47:22,960 --> 00:47:25,580 Absolutely and that was my reason for bringing it to council. 526 00:47:28,690 --> 00:47:33,010 I think that's a good suggestion, the subcommittee, I don't think that's a bad idea. 527 00:47:33,750 --> 00:47:39,730 Yeah, perhaps we can follow up on that with the city manager and the chief and see if there's 528 00:47:39,730 --> 00:47:43,630 an opportunity so that there's more participation. 529 00:47:43,630 --> 00:47:57,430 I just, again, I'm gun shy after this whole thing with the county AMS and, you know, that's already happened. I don't want to do it again where we're getting information where even does a lot of time into it. 530 00:47:58,310 --> 00:47:59,910 Thank you for that chief. 531 00:47:59,910 --> 00:48:08,490 I think some sort of incremental approach is important with this, and I would presume 532 00:48:08,490 --> 00:48:15,110 that chief, you would bring it back to us if you hit a point of fatal flaw in the process. 533 00:48:15,810 --> 00:48:20,570 But one of my concerns and probably other council members' concerns is the amount of time 534 00:48:20,570 --> 00:48:29,410 and effort expended in totality, and if it's a direction that we don't, that we decide 535 00:48:29,410 --> 00:48:34,110 resources. So I fully support the idea of a subcommittee too. Normally, I don't like subcommittees. 536 00:48:34,270 --> 00:48:39,350 In this case, I think it would be have have utility. Thank you, Chief. 537 00:48:42,000 --> 00:48:42,460 Well, thank you 538 00:48:42,460 --> 00:48:46,960 with Council support. I'll circle back with the city manager and the fire chief and have them 539 00:48:46,960 --> 00:48:51,600 come back with what potentially could be some sort of option whenever that might look like to provide 540 00:48:51,600 --> 00:48:59,920 information and input during the process. Thank you. I move that we approve items. 541 00:49:13,060 --> 00:49:25,400 We will move into our first business item this evening and that will be an appointment to the advisory board for the citizens oversight finance advisory committee. 542 00:49:25,400 --> 00:49:29,760 and we want to have one applicant here at the seat. 543 00:49:30,440 --> 00:49:33,860 The other applicant who applied was unable to attend. 544 00:49:35,940 --> 00:49:37,060 So, Brandon, 545 00:49:43,540 --> 00:49:44,700 hang on one second. 546 00:49:45,380 --> 00:49:49,560 Since we're just for housekeeping, the City Attorney's Deck, 547 00:49:49,760 --> 00:49:51,260 do any public comment for an appointment? 548 00:49:52,120 --> 00:49:54,800 Because it's an agenda item I would take public comment. 549 00:49:55,140 --> 00:49:56,120 Perfect, just clarify. 550 00:49:57,080 --> 00:49:59,520 With that, I will open public comment on item 8A. 551 00:50:01,810 --> 00:50:03,910 A.G.P. are there any raised hands in the queue? 552 00:50:04,690 --> 00:50:05,670 Thank you, Mayor Wixam. 553 00:50:05,790 --> 00:50:07,530 There are currently no raised hands in the queue. 554 00:50:07,970 --> 00:50:08,310 Thank you. 555 00:50:08,490 --> 00:50:10,950 With that, I will close public comment and bring it back to Council. 556 00:50:11,570 --> 00:50:12,030 I have a mayor. 557 00:50:12,390 --> 00:50:18,550 May I ask of the Council just a question if we wanted to take a look at, you know, things 558 00:50:18,550 --> 00:50:19,150 you happen. 559 00:50:19,410 --> 00:50:20,990 This gentleman got sick. 560 00:50:21,910 --> 00:50:24,030 We were able to review his resume. 561 00:50:24,030 --> 00:50:32,310 I was just wondering if the council would be willing to maybe look at postponing this or 562 00:50:33,150 --> 00:50:40,770 other option if we want to explore that right now before we thank you. Sure. I'm not interested in postponing it because we have a joint 563 00:50:40,770 --> 00:50:43,970 CFEC meeting and we have two very qualified applicants and 564 00:50:44,870 --> 00:50:49,230 the conversation surrounding this item also is 565 00:50:49,790 --> 00:50:50,210 regarding 566 00:50:51,550 --> 00:51:20,010 changing the timeline on this as well as holding over the other application because we have two more openings in about 60 days or 90 days and we didn't want to have to start all over again so I would be interested in the other applicants application being held over but I will certainly I if I were to weigh in I would agree with you, especially since we have the similar situation with the planning commission and I think that would make that person feel left. 567 00:51:20,010 --> 00:51:24,550 you know like they didn't get a fair you know I just think to keep you know 568 00:51:24,550 --> 00:51:29,530 keep things consistent we should just unfortunately I'm sorry to hear that 569 00:51:30,890 --> 00:51:37,090 he's not well but I would tend to agree I think that we don't need to hold it 570 00:51:37,090 --> 00:51:42,350 over let's just look at the one day can see right now yeah I agree as well I think 571 00:51:42,350 --> 00:51:47,050 the fact that we've got the two open seats coming up January 31st 572 00:51:47,050 --> 00:51:55,970 Lins itself well to taking care of business tonight and then having that the second applicant tonight hold over to that to that next date 573 00:51:56,830 --> 00:51:58,370 Thank you. I appreciate that 574 00:51:58,990 --> 00:52:02,770 So that being said we have one applicant are you interested in? 575 00:52:03,750 --> 00:52:08,930 Reviewing that applicant or would you like to just okay? I see one yes, no 576 00:52:08,930 --> 00:52:16,810 Yeah, I'm I know yeah, I'm comfortable perhaps we can ask it's a four or once perhaps we can ask mr 577 00:52:16,810 --> 00:52:22,170 to come forward and provide a brief statement in regards to your application. 578 00:52:24,680 --> 00:52:25,820 Thank you, Mayor and Council. 579 00:52:27,220 --> 00:52:34,840 As you know, I'm already interested in how this city works, finances are minor in business 580 00:52:34,840 --> 00:52:40,400 with economics and I've read these CFAC reports as boring as they are. 581 00:52:41,400 --> 00:52:44,580 I'm excited to see maybe I can contribute to the analysis. 582 00:52:44,780 --> 00:52:47,940 You've had some fantastic people, some recent subcommittee reports there, 583 00:52:47,940 --> 00:52:52,240 or just amazing and if I can provide an opportunity 584 00:52:52,240 --> 00:52:54,480 to work with you, I'll be more happy to take care 585 00:52:54,480 --> 00:52:58,020 of this short term or however pleased to be appointed. 586 00:52:58,440 --> 00:52:58,680 Thank you. 587 00:53:00,080 --> 00:53:01,220 Thank you, Mr. Brannon. 588 00:53:01,960 --> 00:53:03,300 Wait, before you leave Mr. Brannon, 589 00:53:03,500 --> 00:53:04,800 any questions of Mr. Brannon? 590 00:53:06,340 --> 00:53:06,760 No. 591 00:53:07,440 --> 00:53:08,700 Nope, thank you, Mr. Brannon. 592 00:53:08,860 --> 00:53:09,800 I'm way appreciate you're applying. 593 00:53:11,480 --> 00:53:13,320 So we have some options this evening 594 00:53:13,320 --> 00:53:14,740 that were presented by staff 595 00:53:14,740 --> 00:53:22,060 regarding the open positions because we have three seats that would be opening on 596 00:53:22,060 --> 00:53:30,620 January 31st. The suggestion would be to make this opening vacancy a four-year 597 00:53:30,620 --> 00:53:35,580 term so that it would set off from the other two so we don't have three seats 598 00:53:35,580 --> 00:53:39,420 opening up at the same time and this applicant doesn't have to reapply in three 599 00:53:39,420 --> 00:53:46,080 months. So that would be an option there. Anyone comments? 600 00:53:46,220 --> 00:53:48,840 I like that option, Mayor. 601 00:53:49,160 --> 00:53:53,320 Can you repeat that? I'm sorry. Let me turn it over to the city clerk. 602 00:53:54,940 --> 00:53:59,860 Yeah, thank you, Mayor. The recommendation to avoid having three seats 603 00:53:59,860 --> 00:54:06,640 term out at one time was to extend this term for two more years so the term 604 00:54:06,640 --> 00:54:14,680 in January 31st, 2028. So it'd be just over a two-year term for the remainder of this term. 605 00:54:15,660 --> 00:54:21,400 And then we would have two seats available January 31st of 26 and two seats in 2027. 606 00:54:22,800 --> 00:54:27,220 That sounds like a good solution to me. So it's staggered so we don't have that with three 607 00:54:27,220 --> 00:54:33,600 openings. So where, pardon me, the reason that I asked is I wanted to be Mr. Brandon, if I may 608 00:54:33,600 --> 00:54:37,720 address you. I wanted to make sure that you were aware of how long the term was. 609 00:54:39,380 --> 00:54:40,120 Okay, great. 610 00:54:43,430 --> 00:54:50,050 That was one consideration and the second consideration then was to hold 611 00:54:50,050 --> 00:54:55,590 over this applicant if they are in rest and still holding up this seat that they would not need 612 00:54:55,590 --> 00:55:00,910 to reapply and the application would just move forward to the January openings with the two seats 613 00:55:00,910 --> 00:55:05,310 to open there. I agree. Okay. So with that I will ask for a motion. 614 00:55:08,530 --> 00:55:09,930 I approve. I move 615 00:55:09,930 --> 00:55:10,870 that we approve. 616 00:55:13,450 --> 00:55:22,630 Eight A, which is appointing Mr. Barry Brandon to the CFAC advisory board for 617 00:55:22,630 --> 00:55:23,190 two years. 618 00:55:25,580 --> 00:55:32,000 Oh, and that we're going to carry forward the prior applicant or the applicant 619 00:55:32,000 --> 00:55:33,460 that wasn't able to come tonight. 620 00:55:35,060 --> 00:55:36,120 Do I have a second? 621 00:55:36,480 --> 00:55:37,420 I'll second that please. 622 00:55:38,900 --> 00:55:39,860 That was difficult. 623 00:55:40,080 --> 00:55:40,680 Sorry, everybody. 624 00:55:41,540 --> 00:55:42,020 No, that was good. 625 00:55:42,120 --> 00:55:42,660 Thank you. 626 00:55:42,660 --> 00:55:42,900 All in favor. 627 00:55:43,320 --> 00:55:43,760 Aye, aye. 628 00:55:44,220 --> 00:55:44,660 Opposed? 629 00:55:45,220 --> 00:55:45,880 Motion carries. 630 00:55:46,060 --> 00:55:47,720 Mr. Brandon, thank you for joining us. 631 00:55:48,620 --> 00:55:51,200 And I also see our CFAC chair here this evening. 632 00:55:51,420 --> 00:55:52,900 Mr. Peck, thank you for joining us. 633 00:55:52,980 --> 00:55:55,700 We look forward to our joint meeting next week. 634 00:55:55,700 --> 00:55:57,400 And Mr. Brandon, you have a lot of homework. 635 00:55:59,120 --> 00:55:59,840 Thank you. 636 00:55:59,840 --> 00:56:10,040 And Mr. Brown, or excuse me, Mr. Jones, Michael Jones, sorry about that, it was like a sleep last night, definitely. 637 00:56:10,600 --> 00:56:16,400 Thank you for applying and we hope that you will hold your application over for our January openings. 638 00:56:16,880 --> 00:56:17,200 Thank you. 639 00:56:18,120 --> 00:56:23,620 Without a move on to item 8B and turn this over to our ICM and Finance Department. 640 00:56:24,420 --> 00:56:26,840 Thank you again. Good evening, Mayor and City Council. 641 00:56:26,840 --> 00:56:37,540 This is the subject of tonight's item 8B is adopt resolution number 5425 which revises the City of More Bay Community Grant Policy. 642 00:56:38,020 --> 00:56:42,720 Just briefly as background, the city has annually allocated grant funds to various community groups. 643 00:56:43,300 --> 00:56:54,500 Those funds have ranged from approximately $7,000 in fiscal year 2015-16 up to a total of 60,000 in fiscal year 223. 644 00:56:54,500 --> 00:57:02,140 This year, fiscal year 2526, the adopted budget includes $35,000 of grant funds to allocate 645 00:57:02,140 --> 00:57:03,180 from the general fund. 646 00:57:04,820 --> 00:57:10,000 These grants and funds are a mechanism by which the City Council and the City can assist 647 00:57:10,000 --> 00:57:15,280 non-profit agencies in providing director and direct services to the Morabe residents 648 00:57:15,280 --> 00:57:16,000 and community. 649 00:57:16,980 --> 00:57:23,600 In 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 6719, which approved the Community Grants 650 00:57:23,600 --> 00:57:29,720 policy and addressed the types of activities and organizations that could apply and as 651 00:57:29,720 --> 00:57:36,040 well as the evaluation criteria and a number of guidelines for applicants to follow for 652 00:57:36,040 --> 00:57:37,500 submission of those requests. 653 00:57:39,020 --> 00:57:46,060 The policy documents and procedures that were outlined in resolution 67-19 have been used 654 00:57:46,060 --> 00:57:51,540 for the past five years and we have heard over those years, especially in recent years, 655 00:57:51,540 --> 00:57:57,900 that the application is unnecessarily repetitive and somewhat confusing and the overall process 656 00:57:57,900 --> 00:58:02,840 seems onerous. So we're bringing this item to you tonight to consider streamlining the 657 00:58:02,840 --> 00:58:07,640 process. We're asking you tonight to discuss and provide feedback on the revised policy 658 00:58:07,640 --> 00:58:13,260 document that's attached to the staff report, the potential priority projects or use of funds, 659 00:58:13,860 --> 00:58:18,800 and to also discuss the review and approval process for the award of grant funds. And then 660 00:58:18,800 --> 00:58:22,440 consider whether you would like to set a maximum funding level per application. 661 00:58:23,200 --> 00:58:28,660 In the staff report, we then go on to provide you, if you do make changes tonight, we'll 662 00:58:28,660 --> 00:58:35,080 go ahead and advertise the grant period and follow through, awarding the grants potentially 663 00:58:35,080 --> 00:58:40,220 at the December 9th meeting, and that would mean the successful applicants would have about 664 00:58:40,220 --> 00:58:45,760 six or seven months to complete their awarded projects a little bit shorter time than typical. 665 00:58:46,400 --> 00:58:53,660 Just to conclude, we believe that this revised policy will improve the city's effectiveness 666 00:58:53,660 --> 00:59:00,120 with this program and recommend that you consider adopting Resolution 54-25. 667 00:59:00,920 --> 00:59:05,200 I'm having to answer any questions, but we've really got two experts here with us tonight 668 00:59:05,200 --> 00:59:09,520 that have worked with us policy for a number of years at City Clerk, Dennis Swanson, and 669 00:59:09,520 --> 00:59:12,140 our finance director, Emily Conrad, and I'll turn it back to you, Mayor. 670 00:59:12,140 --> 00:59:18,840 Thank you very much. Ms. Looker, questions for staff? Council Member Loughey, questions? 671 00:59:21,590 --> 00:59:33,990 The one question, Finance Director Emily Comrade, is do you actually review all the applicants 672 00:59:33,990 --> 00:59:42,570 and then recommend the awards right now currently, if I may ask, or is do you just basically 673 00:59:42,570 --> 00:59:47,470 you do like an expel spread sheet of all the people that apply and then send it to our 674 00:59:47,470 --> 00:59:48,850 way. How's that handled please? 675 00:59:51,230 --> 00:59:52,770 Thank you. I'm going to need to 676 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:28,800 So correct me if I'm incorrect, but I believe we just compile them for city council's review or subcommittee of city council for their review and selection. If I may, mayor, can I help out with that since I've been a part of the process. So councilmember Lafay, the last couple years. I was assisted with two members of CFAC. This last year it was Jean Johnson and Brian Dwarfman. 677 01:00:28,800 --> 01:00:47,740 and we went through, I believe it was 16 applications that were submitted for a total of $60,000 in award money, and that's how we were doing it, and we kind of divvied up the funds and awarded the funds, and then it was brought to full council that helps. 678 01:00:48,840 --> 01:00:54,480 No, I did. I remember the two meetings. I went to both CFAC and the city council. 679 01:00:54,480 --> 01:00:59,740 So truthfully, they were very laborious to listen to. 680 01:01:00,200 --> 01:01:05,380 If we're even considering, in my opinion, awarding any grants to any nonprofits, 681 01:01:07,220 --> 01:01:10,300 it has to be handled a different way as far as I'm concerned. 682 01:01:10,580 --> 01:01:12,620 I'm not sure what that way is, but- 683 01:01:12,620 --> 01:01:14,540 Well, just two questions, first one, thank you. 684 01:01:15,160 --> 01:01:15,700 Thank you. 685 01:01:16,120 --> 01:01:23,600 I guess I'll ask Ms. Swanson, because I don't think Ms. Conrad is here in 2013-2014. 686 01:01:23,600 --> 01:01:41,010 So that's when this program started and the money from that at that time it was we got this note that it was $73,000 and that was all from the general fund at that time. 687 01:01:41,010 --> 01:02:04,340 I believe so at that time there was no formal policy in place so during the budget process on profit agencies that were aware that the city might be awarding some funds would be listed and the council would divvy up them a little bit of money that was available it was to 7 to 9,000 range. 688 01:02:05,080 --> 01:02:21,240 And that had gone on for a few years and then they determined it would be better to make a policy and have a process where all non-profits have an opportunity to apply for and be considered to grant funds and fund projects that will fit the community. 689 01:02:21,800 --> 01:02:30,400 And then 73,000 is quite a bit more than in the subsequent years and so it would not must have been like a windfall year or something. 690 01:02:30,400 --> 01:02:36,600 I believe that was when ARPA funds were available, which would, you know, increase the amount available for about three years. 691 01:02:36,980 --> 01:02:38,980 Oh, okay. All right, thank you. 692 01:02:39,220 --> 01:02:46,360 And I want to make sure you heard that I spoke clearly in the $7,000 to $9,000 range, not $79. 693 01:02:47,440 --> 01:02:51,520 So in the early years, it was a very small amount that was available for a time. 694 01:02:51,640 --> 01:02:55,920 Well, I mean, this one year, this particular year, 13 and 14 was $73,000. 695 01:02:58,900 --> 01:03:06,480 So in that year, $58,000 of that amount was paid to the Morabe tourism bureau. 696 01:03:06,860 --> 01:03:12,660 So I think there was an arrangement for a one-time payment there, so only $15,000 of grants 697 01:03:12,660 --> 01:03:13,940 were awarded to non-profit. 698 01:03:14,020 --> 01:03:14,260 Okay. 699 01:03:14,500 --> 01:03:15,020 Thank you. 700 01:03:16,540 --> 01:03:17,060 Yeah. 701 01:03:17,080 --> 01:03:21,200 Just for clarification, that would have been before ARPA funds, and I believe it was when 702 01:03:21,200 --> 01:03:28,020 the city was paying for the tourism to be open, the tourism bureau was separate. 703 01:03:29,720 --> 01:03:33,500 Go ahead, Council Member, if you have any questions. 704 01:03:36,260 --> 01:03:44,160 I think what my biggest question is is having done this, I agree, Council Member Lafay. 705 01:03:44,260 --> 01:03:48,600 It was a very cumbersome project for us. 706 01:03:48,600 --> 01:04:03,360 And it oftentimes, you know, can be more subjective because we weren't getting a lot of the quantified and qualified things that we needed from, I think, the applicants. 707 01:04:03,960 --> 01:04:15,380 And that made it more complicated, and in fact, I think it possibly would have eliminated some had we asked for more details, I think. 708 01:04:15,380 --> 01:04:19,880 I appreciate this scoring rubric, rubric. 709 01:04:20,380 --> 01:04:25,260 We didn't have this when we were going through the process, and 710 01:04:25,260 --> 01:04:30,740 the only thing that I would ask is that did staff go through and 711 01:04:31,500 --> 01:04:45,000 compare the rubric with the application, because it would just be to me it would make sense that it would allow for ease that the applicant would be filling out the same things. 712 01:04:45,000 --> 01:05:01,900 And we would just, you know, go through our list and make sure that we got the answers that we needed or if we needed more information or something was missing, then we can kind of, you know, disqualify or qualify was that considered because I noticed there are discrepancies. 713 01:05:01,900 --> 01:05:07,980 It's really hard to follow between the two and if that was considered or if we could consider doing that. 714 01:05:07,980 --> 01:05:18,360 If that makes sense, that was the intent was to ensure the questions led them to having 715 01:05:18,360 --> 01:05:22,820 a successful application and scored by the rubric and also they would be provided with 716 01:05:22,820 --> 01:05:25,500 the scoring rubric so they would know what they were being judged against. 717 01:05:27,240 --> 01:05:28,320 Okay, thank you. 718 01:05:28,480 --> 01:05:33,220 I did not know that we were going to be supplying them with rubric so that's great. 719 01:05:33,480 --> 01:05:33,900 Thank you. 720 01:05:33,900 --> 01:05:37,800 because I did question that as I was going through everything. 721 01:05:39,000 --> 01:05:46,820 The other question that I did have was what you were referring to in the collaborative 722 01:05:46,820 --> 01:05:51,840 requests area that I think it's down lower on the form. 723 01:05:53,180 --> 01:05:55,920 And were you meaning, because that's confusing to me. 724 01:05:56,220 --> 01:06:00,000 So I guess I want to ask the question, does that, were you meaning two nonprofits working 725 01:06:00,000 --> 01:06:04,460 together so they were, was that what you were referring to? 726 01:06:04,840 --> 01:06:06,300 Any directives to what you're looking at? 727 01:06:06,880 --> 01:06:10,320 Yeah, let me get it right on the 728 01:06:22,670 --> 01:06:24,110 application form. 729 01:06:30,040 --> 01:06:34,160 Yes, item F and it reads, if a collaborative request please provide a description of prior 730 01:06:34,160 --> 01:06:38,380 collaboration activities and proposed responsibilities of collaborative members. 731 01:06:38,960 --> 01:06:39,140 Yes, 732 01:06:42,890 --> 01:06:47,010 I would just comment that while that has not happened it could be that two nonprofits 733 01:06:49,790 --> 01:06:50,390 and 734 01:06:53,240 --> 01:07:16,240 the other one that I had was that if the community grant funding was used for travel because travel and expenses is mentioned on the application form, this was also something that I found, you know, if you're paying for the travel and expenses, you know, how is that going to benefit, you know, a larger group. 735 01:07:16,240 --> 01:07:24,140 So to me, that was maybe more applicable to an individual, so maybe fewer people would benefit from that. 736 01:07:24,500 --> 01:07:30,020 So I was a little confused about that part, and then there was also a mention about events, too. 737 01:07:31,480 --> 01:07:34,000 And so I just wanted to put those out there. 738 01:07:36,140 --> 01:07:45,020 That events was mentioned in an area, and I did not know if this was being used for that or not. 739 01:07:45,020 --> 01:07:47,840 So, I was just a question I had. 740 01:07:51,560 --> 01:07:53,820 I don't have any questions. 741 01:07:54,020 --> 01:07:54,920 Thank you. 742 01:07:55,460 --> 01:07:56,100 Oh, yeah. 743 01:07:56,180 --> 01:07:57,800 I just wanted to know when it became. 744 01:07:58,440 --> 01:08:01,280 When it was see fact that was. 745 01:08:02,740 --> 01:08:03,800 You know, going through this. 746 01:08:03,820 --> 01:08:04,620 Was it always that way? 747 01:08:07,580 --> 01:08:10,260 My recollection is that some years. 748 01:08:11,300 --> 01:08:13,560 The council subcommittee led a community, 749 01:08:13,560 --> 01:08:17,760 a group of community members not affiliated with the non-profits, of course. 750 01:08:17,760 --> 01:08:24,400 and they did a group review and then brought a recommendation to Council and more recently maybe the last two or three years it's been 751 01:08:25,820 --> 01:08:32,580 Consolease on to the seat back along with two seat back members that did that internal or pre review prior to Council 752 01:08:32,580 --> 01:08:38,760 Right. Thank you. Any other questions but that I will open public comment on this item 753 01:08:47,570 --> 01:08:54,010 Good evening Council Mayor my name is Dean Allen Quest. I am the CEO for the Morabay Chamber of Commerce 754 01:08:55,270 --> 01:09:00,790 I appreciate the city's commitment to accountability, but we have concerns about how these policies 755 01:09:00,790 --> 01:09:04,990 changes will affect the organizations doing frontline work in Moral Bay. 756 01:09:06,150 --> 01:09:11,490 I acknowledge why these policies exist last year the city received 16 grant applications 757 01:09:11,490 --> 01:09:16,910 requesting $114,000 against a $60,000 available funding. 758 01:09:17,650 --> 01:09:22,550 We support accountability and proper documentation of how public funds are used. 759 01:09:22,550 --> 01:09:36,430 Something to consider, these changes disproportionately burden smaller organizations in our community, the ones often run by one or two part-time staff members doing the most direct work with various populations. 760 01:09:37,250 --> 01:09:50,670 The enhanced documentation requirements, detailed expense tracking, June 30th spending deadline, and July 31st reporting deadline create a significant administrative load for our smaller nonprofit operations. 761 01:09:50,670 --> 01:09:56,290 that are operating on smaller budgets, the staff time required to manage these compliance 762 01:09:56,290 --> 01:09:59,850 requirements can exceed the value of the grant itself. 763 01:10:00,870 --> 01:10:09,010 For example, Monday, the Chamber hosted a nonprofit roundtable, and we had 17 nonprofits 764 01:10:09,010 --> 01:10:10,370 in the community attend. 765 01:10:11,210 --> 01:10:17,730 One of the larger nonprofits in our county, which will remain nameless, said they spent more 766 01:10:17,730 --> 01:10:25,770 more money than they received due to the laborious requirements that were needed for these grants. 767 01:10:26,930 --> 01:10:31,930 Asking organizations with limited capacity to meet the same administrative standards 768 01:10:31,930 --> 01:10:36,290 as larger nonprofits with full-time finance staff is not equitable. 769 01:10:37,050 --> 01:10:40,910 We've reviewed the scoring rubric you'll use to evaluate applications. 770 01:10:40,950 --> 01:10:44,570 It's well designed but it has an implicit bias that concerns us. 771 01:10:44,570 --> 01:10:46,810 look at the assessment evaluation category. 772 01:10:47,010 --> 01:10:49,950 It requires clear picture of how data will be collected 773 01:10:50,350 --> 01:10:53,250 to demonstrate the degree to which outcomes are met. 774 01:10:54,310 --> 01:10:56,730 That language assumes established systems 775 01:10:56,730 --> 01:10:58,830 and sophisticated infrastructures. 776 01:10:59,390 --> 01:11:03,110 Many grassroots organizations excel at delivering services, 777 01:11:03,510 --> 01:11:06,770 but lack the capacity to build data collection systems. 778 01:11:07,670 --> 01:11:12,110 For example, a food bank serving 100 families monthly 779 01:11:12,110 --> 01:11:14,270 might score poorly on this evaluation 780 01:11:14,270 --> 01:11:28,930 Despite an obvious and measurable impact, this tool will systematically disadvantage the organizations that may be most responsive to immediate local needs, but lack the infrastructure of established agencies. 781 01:11:29,950 --> 01:11:34,070 So this was the second roundtable we've had with our nonprofits. 782 01:11:34,070 --> 01:11:40,570 Many of these nonprofits are run by one, maybe two individuals, and a number of volunteers. 783 01:11:41,350 --> 01:11:48,110 So this does put an undue burden on their staff, whether they have the ability or 784 01:11:49,150 --> 01:11:52,650 the education to even do some of the things that are required. 785 01:11:54,430 --> 01:11:55,250 Thank you. 786 01:12:05,560 --> 01:12:07,840 Betty, when holds again, Morabe. 787 01:12:08,460 --> 01:12:13,260 On your first page on the very first sentence, it says the City of Morabe is a full 788 01:12:13,260 --> 01:12:19,460 service city providing police, fire protection, public works, harbor, recreation, and community 789 01:12:19,460 --> 01:12:24,480 development. Where is the word parks? I think the word parks needs to be in there. 790 01:12:24,600 --> 01:12:30,160 That's something that we're very proud of and it's one of our major assets and that people 791 01:12:30,160 --> 01:12:37,420 both locally and outside enjoy. So I'd encourage you to add that. I would like to agree with 792 01:12:37,420 --> 01:12:43,380 the previous speaker that this has been and to some extent still is a laborious process. 793 01:12:45,500 --> 01:12:51,260 It's so formal, you know, I think back to when Neil Farrell who works on the Stereo Bay 794 01:12:51,260 --> 01:12:57,420 News, he and three other people got together back in the early 1990s and said, let's put 795 01:12:57,420 --> 01:12:59,160 some murals up around Moro Bay. 796 01:12:59,740 --> 01:13:04,160 And it was like four volunteers and they worked it and they came to the city and they asked 797 01:13:04,160 --> 01:13:05,220 for a little bit of money. 798 01:13:06,120 --> 01:13:08,640 How would that fit in something like this today? 799 01:13:09,140 --> 01:13:13,320 I think this is overly still burdensome to some extent. 800 01:13:13,320 --> 01:13:14,500 It's very formal. 801 01:13:15,120 --> 01:13:17,680 I don't know that it needs to be this formal. 802 01:13:17,860 --> 01:13:23,620 I think a lot of it's cleaned up when you look at attachment A, and they've taken out 803 01:13:23,620 --> 01:13:24,420 of a lot of stuff. 804 01:13:24,580 --> 01:13:32,260 But I don't know if attachment one, the application itself, is new or old, and it's just 805 01:13:32,260 --> 01:13:38,740 And in some places, it actually asks the same question in two different ways as was stated earlier. 806 01:13:39,340 --> 01:13:47,780 So, and for me, the Rubik also has built in bias because it's subjective. 807 01:13:48,200 --> 01:13:51,600 Is this an exemplary project based on what? 808 01:13:52,100 --> 01:13:57,300 And so, I know you need to have something, I don't know if this is it, and 809 01:13:57,300 --> 01:14:05,680 And it's a little bit too much for me and so I encourage you to go back to the drawing board or at least pair it down somewhat. 810 01:14:05,940 --> 01:14:08,280 The application's five pages long. That's crazy. 811 01:14:12,060 --> 01:14:13,980 Anyone else for public comment on this item? 812 01:14:15,180 --> 01:14:16,940 A.G.P. Are there any raised hands in the queue? 813 01:14:17,480 --> 01:14:19,340 No, Madam Mayor, there are no raised hands in the queue. 814 01:14:19,900 --> 01:14:22,700 Thank you with that. I will close public comment and bring it back to council. 815 01:14:23,380 --> 01:14:25,160 Any other questions before we go into the. 816 01:14:26,220 --> 01:14:29,160 I will start down on my right, Council Member Lafay. 817 01:14:30,220 --> 01:14:43,020 Well, having not started to nonprofits here in Moral Bay and having heard what I just, you know, tried to read here, I think this whole policy needs to be scrapped. 818 01:14:43,360 --> 01:14:53,720 I am not in favor of even doing a grant policy this year as far as I'm concerned. Until it becomes more simplified, I agree with the last speaker. 819 01:14:53,720 --> 01:14:53,800 here. 820 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:07,020 The viable project should be done, not so much like we're doing it right now, but to be very 821 01:15:07,020 --> 01:15:10,860 honest with you, I'm not a favor of continuing this program this year. 822 01:15:15,710 --> 01:15:16,990 I have no comments 823 01:15:16,990 --> 01:15:17,450 right now. 824 01:15:18,750 --> 01:15:20,530 Mr. Pro Tem, comments? 825 01:15:22,010 --> 01:15:30,310 Yeah. Council Member Lefei, I had thought along the same lines, but felt that maybe that 826 01:15:30,310 --> 01:15:31,930 That would be a different discussion. 827 01:15:32,830 --> 01:15:40,430 So it's interesting to hear that from you as it, you know, we have dwindling money. 828 01:15:40,630 --> 01:15:43,630 We went from 60,000 to 35,000. 829 01:15:44,350 --> 01:15:51,350 And my challenge with this is you have a few reoccurring submissions. 830 01:15:51,590 --> 01:15:59,330 And so if you get multiple reoccurring submissions, how are we going to then accommodate for that? 831 01:15:59,330 --> 01:16:02,430 Are we going to say that, you know, we rotate that around? 832 01:16:02,790 --> 01:16:06,110 I just, I think there is further discussion to be had. 833 01:16:07,370 --> 01:16:14,870 I also felt that community benefit, you know, we look at, I know that we've had submissions 834 01:16:14,870 --> 01:16:24,170 where, you know, there was one person being brought in to, you know, conduct a speaking engagement 835 01:16:24,170 --> 01:16:40,770 to we get high schoolers maybe sent to Hawaii to Moral Bay in Bloom, where we know that there is a large benefit to what they do in terms of the greater community who had impacts. 836 01:16:40,770 --> 01:16:57,810 So, that becomes a challenge determining what is that community impact, which is to me the criteria that we want to be looking at, but then how do you measure that? 837 01:16:58,130 --> 01:17:07,350 So, say by the sea productions, for example, if we're getting lighting or seating for them, by the sea productions could say, here's the estimate. 838 01:17:07,350 --> 01:17:13,290 this is and cost it out get an estimate and they could say we do I don't know 25 839 01:17:13,290 --> 01:17:19,270 performances a year and 50 people come and we so we could have a really good 840 01:17:19,270 --> 01:17:27,330 metric of you know the return on what we're giving awarding them so again to 841 01:17:28,430 --> 01:17:34,390 one of our speakers comments yeah is this getting too laborious for what we're 842 01:17:34,390 --> 01:17:39,210 we're trying to achieve with this grant awarding. 843 01:17:39,730 --> 01:17:41,890 So those are my comments right now. 844 01:17:43,630 --> 01:17:44,830 Council member Eccles. 845 01:17:45,370 --> 01:17:45,950 Thank you Madam Mayor. 846 01:17:47,350 --> 01:17:49,850 First I wanna thank staff for doing the good work 847 01:17:49,850 --> 01:17:51,710 on the revision of the policy. 848 01:17:54,290 --> 01:17:56,890 I run a 501C3 849 01:17:56,890 --> 01:17:59,750 and I've been on both sides of the grant equation. 850 01:18:00,070 --> 01:18:02,370 I've served on grant review committees as well. 851 01:18:04,390 --> 01:18:14,430 Again, the work that staff did on this is really a high level for, I would say, grants of maybe $50 to $100,000 and above. 852 01:18:15,150 --> 01:18:20,010 So staff provided us with an option for best practices. 853 01:18:21,110 --> 01:18:29,090 That said, it also frustrates me that staff resources were used on this. 854 01:18:29,350 --> 01:18:32,790 I feel similar sentiment to Council Member Lafay. 855 01:18:32,790 --> 01:18:39,550 Okay, I think this is a well-intentioned program, but honestly, I feel it's not something 856 01:18:39,550 --> 01:18:44,410 that the city should be doing at all, particularly with general funds, because what happens 857 01:18:44,410 --> 01:18:53,090 is these are taxpayer dollars that are in the city coffers, and they're designed to provide 858 01:18:53,090 --> 01:18:58,410 for the essential services that one of our public speakers mentioned, public safety streets, 859 01:18:58,410 --> 01:19:13,450 rates, infrastructure, facilities, parks, and I don't think that general fund dollars should be redistributed as gifts based on really the subjective notions of five individuals. 860 01:19:13,690 --> 01:19:19,210 I think those general fund dollars should stay in the general fund and be spent on city services for what they're meant for. 861 01:19:19,210 --> 01:19:20,250 I 862 01:19:23,520 --> 01:19:30,840 made a few notes, yeah, and I'll just conclude by saying, the CEO of the Chamber of Commerce 863 01:19:30,840 --> 01:19:38,260 made an excellent point that the staff time on the recipient can exceed the value of the 864 01:19:38,260 --> 01:19:44,240 grant received and in looking at this process, I would say that's a factual statement, but 865 01:19:44,240 --> 01:19:45,560 that's only half the equation. 866 01:19:45,560 --> 01:19:55,420 The other half is the staff time and effort on the city's behalf, the process, the accounting, and then the council time. 867 01:19:56,160 --> 01:20:06,940 So I, at this point, and I think it's something that can be addressed, that will need to address down the road, maybe simplifying the processes was done before on individual basis. 868 01:20:06,940 --> 01:20:23,580 But for tonight, I would love for us to move down the direction of just rescinding the original resolution, 6-7-19, and then taking it down the road as Councilmember LaFace stated as well. Thank you. 869 01:20:24,360 --> 01:20:25,720 Thank you, Councilmembers. 870 01:20:27,920 --> 01:20:33,860 I mean, I want to start out by saying that the three years coming up that I've been up on the 871 01:20:33,860 --> 01:20:38,880 Dias and been a part of this, all the nonprofits are worthy of our support. 872 01:20:39,260 --> 01:20:44,440 And so it is always difficult when you choose the ones and not the others. 873 01:20:44,960 --> 01:20:49,420 And that in itself is always a little unsettling. 874 01:20:49,420 --> 01:20:55,380 I mean, we're fortunate that there are a lot of service clubs that are very supportive 875 01:20:55,380 --> 01:20:59,540 of the fundraising and provide a lot of funding for a lot of these organizations. 876 01:21:00,260 --> 01:21:05,900 And I know, I think we all know during these challenging times financially that all the 877 01:21:05,900 --> 01:21:08,520 nonprofits are looking for whatever support they can get. 878 01:21:09,140 --> 01:21:15,540 That means that $35,000, when we spend an hour up here deliberating and we're talking 879 01:21:15,540 --> 01:21:44,580 in about multi-million dollar budgets and infrastructure projects at use of our time in productivity, I would rather, and I agree with, I think, most of the sentiment up here that I would be interested in pausing this, rescinding it and re-evaluating what it would look like we have as was alluded to in kind requests that come to us, we had one that was made and we haven't responded back yet. 880 01:21:44,580 --> 01:21:48,220 that we had the one with the murals with Mr. Farrell where they did that. 881 01:21:48,400 --> 01:21:56,380 They're in kind request that we support through the recreation department on fee reductions and permit waivers, 882 01:21:56,640 --> 01:22:01,980 or where our community services organizations, whether it be the volunteers at the police, 883 01:22:02,120 --> 01:22:05,880 or somewhere partner up and help with nonprofits and things. 884 01:22:06,620 --> 01:22:11,220 Looking at partnerships, how the city can perhaps we can support some of these nonprofits, 885 01:22:11,220 --> 01:22:17,580 but through a partnership with them instead of doing this whole process picking and choosing. 886 01:22:17,900 --> 01:22:19,560 I mean, yes, you are still to a point. 887 01:22:19,600 --> 01:22:23,320 You would want some criteria of how that partnership with that looks like. 888 01:22:23,360 --> 01:22:26,480 And I think that those are things that I know are coming back to us. 889 01:22:27,040 --> 01:22:31,540 I would look for a head nod from the city managers for as events, policies, 890 01:22:31,540 --> 01:22:34,380 and economic development, which are both coming back to us. 891 01:22:34,380 --> 01:22:39,140 And it seems like this is something that could fit within those two conversations. 892 01:22:39,800 --> 01:22:44,740 I don't want us to just do a way and I agree with the taxpayer's dollars, but I also feel 893 01:22:45,760 --> 01:22:50,880 have an opportunity to help support these organizations, especially those in our community. 894 01:22:51,520 --> 01:22:59,380 And even the county ones that we've supported are all worthy and some, but I think we get 895 01:22:59,380 --> 01:23:06,200 approach it maybe in a different way that might be less cumbersome than this process and 896 01:23:06,200 --> 01:23:08,900 and still allow us to participate in supporting some of those. 897 01:23:09,700 --> 01:23:17,880 So, my hope out of this is that in those two conversations with economic development and event policies, we can revisit these. 898 01:23:19,760 --> 01:23:22,120 The Chair will be willing to entertain a motion. 899 01:23:23,120 --> 01:23:25,720 And with the Chair's indulgence, I'll check with the city attorney. 900 01:23:28,180 --> 01:23:36,040 Is the language proper and just saying to rescind if I move to rescind resolution number six, seven, dash one, nine. 901 01:23:39,400 --> 01:24:04,480 I'm not sure how the city has historically done that and whether the clerk would have a preference on making sure that it's clear in the record, that the resolution that would be rescinded has been rescinded so we can definitely adopt the resolution to rescind the resolution or I think it's also appropriate to just do it by motion and have it reflected in the minutes but I want to be cognizant of maybe historical practices 902 01:24:04,480 --> 01:24:06,240 cases or just so we don't have this outlier. 903 01:24:07,970 --> 01:24:13,060 In this case, the motion makes sense because we're not amending the policy which is simply 904 01:24:13,060 --> 01:24:14,540 resending for me. 905 01:24:15,680 --> 01:24:16,480 Thank you. 906 01:24:16,580 --> 01:24:17,500 I appreciate it. 907 01:24:17,620 --> 01:24:23,400 Given the guidance that I just received, I move that the Morabase City Council rescind 908 01:24:23,400 --> 01:24:25,800 resolution number 67-19. 909 01:24:26,380 --> 01:24:26,960 I'll second that. 910 01:24:27,460 --> 01:24:27,840 Thank you. 911 01:24:28,180 --> 01:24:29,360 Voice vote all in favour? 912 01:24:29,940 --> 01:24:30,140 Aye. 913 01:24:31,040 --> 01:24:31,380 Opposed? 914 01:24:31,960 --> 01:24:32,720 Motion carries. 915 01:24:32,720 --> 01:24:33,380 thank you. 916 01:24:35,610 --> 01:24:41,670 Being on to item 8c, short-term rental ordinance implementation, quarterly update. 917 01:24:43,860 --> 01:24:47,480 Good evening, Mayor and Council. I'm Mayor Lansingwell of your committee development director 918 01:24:47,480 --> 01:24:51,780 and I have a PowerPoint presentation here. AGP could pull it up. 919 01:24:53,910 --> 01:24:55,150 Thank you, AGP. 920 01:24:55,810 --> 01:25:00,290 So when the committee development department started our implementation and enforcement 921 01:25:00,290 --> 01:25:04,810 of the short-term rental ordinance, I committed to providing quarterly updates to the City Council. 922 01:25:04,810 --> 01:25:10,370 I'm pleased this evening to provide the third quarterly update of the year. 923 01:25:10,830 --> 01:25:15,310 This has been a real collaborative effort with our planning division, building division, 924 01:25:15,670 --> 01:25:19,990 co-enforcement, finance department, city manager, city attorney, and I'm really pleased 925 01:25:19,990 --> 01:25:25,450 to be able to highlight our accomplishments today with implementing and enforcing the 926 01:25:25,450 --> 01:25:26,270 short-term rental ordinance. 927 01:25:28,610 --> 01:25:33,390 I'll briefly go over the background that I believe the council is fairly familiar with already. 928 01:25:33,390 --> 01:25:39,810 So the current version of the short-term rental ordinance was enacted in September of 2021. 929 01:25:40,770 --> 01:25:46,770 In the beginning of this year, we initiated what we've been calling an audit of all of the existing 930 01:25:47,770 --> 01:25:54,050 STRs to get them all into compliance and to issue short-term rental permits. 931 01:25:55,750 --> 01:26:00,950 And our last quarterly update in June, the council did authorize issuing new STR permits for 932 01:26:00,950 --> 01:26:03,050 commercial property, properties only. 933 01:26:03,390 --> 01:26:05,830 So, so far with this annual audit process, 934 01:26:05,830 --> 01:26:08,490 we've only been issuing an STR renewal permits, 935 01:26:09,090 --> 01:26:11,110 but in June council authorized the department 936 01:26:11,110 --> 01:26:13,110 to begin issuing new STR permits 937 01:26:13,110 --> 01:26:14,470 for commercialized-owned properties. 938 01:26:15,070 --> 01:26:18,810 We haven't received any viable applications yet 939 01:26:18,810 --> 01:26:22,270 for a new STR on a commercialized-owned property. 940 01:26:22,750 --> 01:26:25,230 We received some interest from landowners. 941 01:26:25,710 --> 01:26:27,990 However, the properties for various reasons 942 01:26:27,990 --> 01:26:30,510 were not eligible to be used as short-term rentals. 943 01:26:30,510 --> 01:26:32,970 so we weren't able to issue those STR permits. 944 01:26:34,610 --> 01:26:38,970 And in August of this year, we initiated our proactive 945 01:26:38,970 --> 01:26:41,670 code enforcement efforts on the STR ordinance, 946 01:26:41,870 --> 01:26:44,110 so working with a company called Decker, 947 01:26:44,290 --> 01:26:48,750 they have a web service called Rental Skate, 948 01:26:48,790 --> 01:26:51,570 that allows city staff to identify all of the short 949 01:26:51,570 --> 01:26:54,930 credentials that are advertising on the various online hosting 950 01:26:54,930 --> 01:26:55,510 platforms. 951 01:26:55,910 --> 01:26:58,330 We compare those records to our permitting records. 952 01:26:58,330 --> 01:27:06,530 and then if we identify illegally operating SCRs we issue cease and assist orders and take action to shut them down. 953 01:27:10,830 --> 01:27:20,170 So here are the numbers outlined in the staff report just letting the council and public know where we are so far this year with our STR renewal permits. 954 01:27:20,890 --> 01:27:25,910 So looking at the column on the right hand side for October, the current update. 955 01:27:25,910 --> 01:27:36,170 So we've identified 251 properties that at some point in time have had a business license or a TOT account for a short-term rental. 956 01:27:36,510 --> 01:27:40,010 We call those our total known on record short-term rental. 957 01:27:40,170 --> 01:27:42,070 So that's what we start with. 958 01:27:42,790 --> 01:27:47,910 Through this year's process, we've closed 86 of those for various reasons. 959 01:27:48,730 --> 01:27:55,450 Many of them, we send out a notice letting them know that they need to apply for a short-term rental permit. 960 01:27:55,450 --> 01:28:00,050 and inspection and meet all the requirements of the ordinance then we hear back say they're not 961 01:28:00,050 --> 01:28:07,730 interested in continuing to operate and so they close out and we have others that have just 962 01:28:07,730 --> 01:28:14,090 the sunsetted out. Additionally we've received five applications that were not eligible for renewal 963 01:28:14,090 --> 01:28:21,650 for various reasons and we denied those applications. That leads us or results in 160 will be called 964 01:28:21,650 --> 01:28:28,910 potentially active short-term rentals and kind of breaking those down. So, so far this year, 965 01:28:29,010 --> 01:28:35,530 we've issued 86 STR renewal permits. There's 45 currently in process, so those are ones where we 966 01:28:35,530 --> 01:28:40,610 they've applied. We've started reviewing them and they, you know, some of them just still need an 967 01:28:40,610 --> 01:28:45,590 inspection to be completed or we're still verifying that they met the minimum TOT requirement, 968 01:28:46,870 --> 01:28:50,170 verifying that they may all have required requirements before we can issue that permit. 969 01:28:50,170 --> 01:28:55,870 And the third category here is STR renewal permits that have not started at 27. 970 01:28:56,250 --> 01:28:59,890 These are ones where simply they haven't received our letter yet to start the process. 971 01:29:00,170 --> 01:29:05,950 Because we time these renewal letters with the current business license and 972 01:29:05,950 --> 01:29:09,910 those all expire on a monthly, at the end of the month, each month, throughout the year. 973 01:29:10,110 --> 01:29:16,890 So we still have a couple more rounds of letters to send out to start renewals on those 27. 974 01:29:16,890 --> 01:29:26,810 And then there's an additional two STR permits that we've denied, and those have been appealed, and they're appending appeal hearings or settlement agreements. 975 01:29:30,940 --> 01:29:39,240 So the big question that comes up is we are all aware of the cap of 175 full home, residential, short-term rentals. 976 01:29:39,400 --> 01:29:42,300 So where are we relative to that 175 cap? 977 01:29:42,300 --> 01:29:54,080 At the last update in June, I reported that there were currently 137 potential full home residential SCRs that are permitted and that number is now down to 978 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:10,540 Potential commercial zone, short-term rentals and 16 residential home shares, and of course, the commercial and STRs and the home shares are not subject to the 175 cap. 979 01:30:13,580 --> 01:30:32,180 Here's a map showing all of the short-term rentals that were listed out on the previous slide. Of course, it's not easy to read at this scale, but these maps are attached to the staff report and available for the public and council to review. They are color-coded with the orange dots representing the short-term rental 980 01:30:32,180 --> 01:30:37,380 permits that are in process, the green ones representing the 86 issued SCR permits and 981 01:30:37,380 --> 01:30:41,880 yellow dots are the ones the 27 that haven't started yet and then the red are the ones 982 01:30:41,880 --> 01:30:47,620 that have been closed or denied. And the circle around the dots on the left represents the 175 983 01:30:47,620 --> 01:30:49,500 foot buffer requirement. 984 01:30:53,900 --> 01:30:59,060 As I mentioned beginning in August of this year the city started our 985 01:30:59,060 --> 01:31:04,960 proactive code enforcement efforts to close down illegally operating short-term rentals using 986 01:31:04,960 --> 01:31:14,380 Decor's rental skate. We've issued a season assist orders to 15 properties so far. 987 01:31:14,620 --> 01:31:20,200 Again, these are ones that are advertising as STRs, but they don't have the required permits. 988 01:31:21,060 --> 01:31:25,560 I'm working with a number of property owners. There's so many different variations and 989 01:31:25,560 --> 01:31:31,760 different situations that we need to sort through. Some of these STRs do have a path to compliance, 990 01:31:31,760 --> 01:31:33,760 other's have no pass to compliance. 991 01:31:38,340 --> 01:31:49,140 As I outlined in the staff report, there is a option for the council to direct staff to bring back an ordinance to increase the fines for short term rentals. 992 01:31:49,760 --> 01:31:52,980 I do what I mentioned like we've talked about a previous council meetings. 993 01:31:53,460 --> 01:32:00,860 Our goal when imposing fines is to achieve compliance. Compliance is always our goal. We're not looking to penalize or collect revenue. 994 01:32:00,860 --> 01:32:04,900 it's all about using fines as a tool to get short-term rentals into compliance, 995 01:32:05,120 --> 01:32:09,060 whether that means shutting down or coming in and getting the required permits. 996 01:32:09,960 --> 01:32:15,480 Our current citation penalty structure and the municipal code is established 997 01:32:15,480 --> 01:32:20,560 per state law and the way it works is after we issue a cease and assist order, 998 01:32:20,780 --> 01:32:24,640 giving the time frame to achieve compliance if that compliance is not achieved 999 01:32:24,640 --> 01:32:37,380 by the deadline, will issue a $100 citation for the first violation, $200 citation for the second violation and a $500 citation for the third violation if those are within a one year time period. 1000 01:32:37,840 --> 01:32:52,640 Again, those amounts are prescribed by state law, however, another state law went into effect a few years ago, SB 60, which does authorize cities to increase the penalties for short-term rentals that do not comply with local short-term rental ordinances. 1001 01:32:52,640 --> 01:32:59,120 There are some limitations on those penalties so they have to be based on a 1002 01:32:59,120 --> 01:33:06,200 demonstrated health and safety issue and it can't be for an initial failure to 1003 01:33:06,200 --> 01:33:07,740 obtain permits. 1004 01:33:12,000 --> 01:33:14,160 And so just kind of wrapping up the presentation here, there are a 1005 01:33:14,160 --> 01:33:17,980 few decision points where the council may want to provide staff a direction. The 1006 01:33:17,980 --> 01:33:22,680 first is on that question of whether council would like to direct staff to come 1007 01:33:22,680 --> 01:33:32,840 I'm back with an ordinance to increase the amount of citations per SB 60 additionally as we're wrapping up our 2025 audit year. 1008 01:33:32,940 --> 01:33:46,520 This is a good time for Council to start thinking and possibly provide direction to staff on the question of do we want to allow a new residential SCR permits to be issued recognizing that at this point. 1009 01:33:46,520 --> 01:33:53,780 My staff feels confident in telling the council and public that we are well below that 175 cap on the full-hole residential 1010 01:33:54,880 --> 01:33:58,920 STRs and there are about a hundred and I believe 86 properties on the wait list 1011 01:33:58,920 --> 01:34:04,140 Some of which have been waiting on the wait list for quite some time now and just waiting for an opportunity to 1012 01:34:04,680 --> 01:34:10,700 Get a permit and legally operate an STR and so this should be a good time for council 1013 01:34:10,700 --> 01:34:15,700 Maybe start a discussion on whether to be interest in releasing some properties off off the wait list 1014 01:34:15,700 --> 01:34:16,620 at the end of the year. 1015 01:34:17,520 --> 01:34:18,940 And then as part of that discussion, 1016 01:34:19,300 --> 01:34:21,780 there is an important distinction between a home share 1017 01:34:21,780 --> 01:34:23,460 and a full home rental. 1018 01:34:24,160 --> 01:34:28,120 So another option could be directing staff to go ahead 1019 01:34:28,120 --> 01:34:31,020 and issue new STR permits but for home shares only 1020 01:34:31,020 --> 01:34:34,320 as the home shares tend to have lesser neighborhood impacts 1021 01:34:34,320 --> 01:34:35,720 compared to the full home rentals. 1022 01:34:35,840 --> 01:34:37,200 And also the home shares aren't subject 1023 01:34:37,200 --> 01:34:39,100 to that 175 cap. 1024 01:34:40,260 --> 01:34:42,440 And that concludes staff's presentation 1025 01:34:42,440 --> 01:34:43,820 and available for questions. 1026 01:34:43,820 --> 01:34:51,080 questions. Thank you, Mr. Singh-Walt. Questions? I'll start on my left, our pro-10. Questions? 1027 01:34:53,040 --> 01:34:59,840 Thank you, Mayor. I was curious about how many, let's see, 1028 01:35:03,260 --> 01:35:05,700 have we gone through and evaluated 1029 01:35:05,700 --> 01:35:14,340 already those 186 that are on there? Do you know if there are some that would not be viable? 1030 01:35:15,480 --> 01:35:20,980 Yeah, that's that's a great question if HEP could just pull up the PowerPoint presentation again. 1031 01:35:21,820 --> 01:35:28,780 So here's those maps and the one on the left you see the red radius the the buffer around all 1032 01:35:28,780 --> 01:35:35,200 of the SCR dots on the map so that represents the 175 but buffer I don't have the wait lists 1033 01:35:35,200 --> 01:35:40,180 overlaid on this but you can see there are very high concentrations of short-term rentals 1034 01:35:40,180 --> 01:35:44,640 in certain areas, you know, particularly around the beach track area. 1035 01:35:45,180 --> 01:35:50,640 So for a property to get off the wait list and get an SCR permit to operate as a new 1036 01:35:50,640 --> 01:35:55,340 STR, they would have to comply with the 175-foot buffer requirement. 1037 01:35:55,880 --> 01:36:00,780 The reason why we have so many overlapping concentrated STRs on this map is these were all grandfathered 1038 01:36:00,780 --> 01:36:05,720 in and the ordinance specifically exempted these grandfathered STRs from the buffer requirement, 1039 01:36:05,860 --> 01:36:07,920 but a new STR would have to meet the buffer requirement. 1040 01:36:07,920 --> 01:36:17,760 So you could see, yet if we overlay the wait list on here that many, many, I imagine well more than half of the wait list properties would be buffered out. 1041 01:36:19,630 --> 01:36:27,810 I really appreciate putting up that slide again, I think it's great for the community and for us to see that visually, so thank you for that. 1042 01:36:30,650 --> 01:36:31,350 Thank you. 1043 01:36:31,350 --> 01:36:35,390 My question for you, Director, is on the enforcement issue, 1044 01:36:36,790 --> 01:36:39,650 what are some of the challenges that you've run into? 1045 01:36:39,950 --> 01:36:43,170 Is there, once someone figures out 1046 01:36:43,170 --> 01:36:44,850 that they're operating illegally, 1047 01:36:45,970 --> 01:36:48,330 is there a high rate of recidivism, 1048 01:36:48,650 --> 01:36:51,590 or just what's been our experience in terms of enforcement? 1049 01:36:54,420 --> 01:36:58,840 So, it's been mixed, again, every situation 1050 01:36:58,840 --> 01:37:01,140 and is that requiring a lot of research. 1051 01:37:02,260 --> 01:37:05,440 You know, for example, through our decade, 1052 01:37:05,820 --> 01:37:07,460 the service that we use, 1053 01:37:07,620 --> 01:37:10,720 we're able to see historic bookings 1054 01:37:10,720 --> 01:37:12,980 and we're able to clearly show that, you know, 1055 01:37:12,980 --> 01:37:15,800 you've had bookings during these time frames 1056 01:37:15,800 --> 01:37:19,820 and we also have reviews that are cataloged by a decker 1057 01:37:19,820 --> 01:37:23,240 that we can, those are actually the most easily 1058 01:37:23,240 --> 01:37:26,080 enforceable, verifiable information that we have. 1059 01:37:28,160 --> 01:37:33,220 However, sometimes the SCR operators will dispute that information, and so we have to review 1060 01:37:33,220 --> 01:37:34,480 their records. 1061 01:37:34,820 --> 01:37:40,220 They'll provide us copies of text messages and emails from Airbnb and BRBGO. 1062 01:37:40,480 --> 01:37:45,200 So just sort it through all of that information before you were able to make a final decision 1063 01:37:45,200 --> 01:37:49,400 and have a case that we can actually prosecute if we take it to a hearing officer. 1064 01:37:49,560 --> 01:37:51,560 That just requires a lot of work. 1065 01:37:51,560 --> 01:37:56,800 the other situation that I alluded to in the staff report is of course 1066 01:37:56,800 --> 01:38:01,840 short-term rental is defined as a property renting to guests for stays of 1067 01:38:01,840 --> 01:38:05,500 less than 30 days so we'll have short-term rentals once they receive our 1068 01:38:05,500 --> 01:38:10,080 cease and assist order they will change their ad to advertise a minimum of 30 days 1069 01:38:10,080 --> 01:38:14,680 which is in compliance with the ordinance but that requires a lot of follow-up and 1070 01:38:14,680 --> 01:38:20,180 staff time to make sure that you know during evenings and weekends and all 1071 01:38:20,180 --> 01:38:24,640 All times of the year, it still is listing the property only as a minimum 30-day stay. 1072 01:38:24,960 --> 01:38:27,860 So there are certainly challenges that we're facing with that. 1073 01:38:28,740 --> 01:38:45,060 And last question, do you think that at any time in the future there might be a possibility that the city could get an app that would be used to register all the STRs in the city and the citizens would be able to go on the app and 1074 01:38:45,060 --> 01:38:54,500 and also report violations or check on the permitting status of a particular property. 1075 01:38:54,580 --> 01:38:58,440 It's something that I've talked about for a couple of years, and so I just like to continue 1076 01:38:58,440 --> 01:39:00,660 to bring it up hoping that someday it might happen. 1077 01:39:01,000 --> 01:39:07,960 I could see that potentially as a project for an intern or a class at Cuesta or Cal Poly or 1078 01:39:07,960 --> 01:39:13,540 in a couple of years we could just have AI do it for us, but I would love to see, well let 1079 01:39:13,540 --> 01:39:14,060 me just ask you. 1080 01:39:14,060 --> 01:39:16,260 Do you think that's a possibility at some time in the future? 1081 01:39:16,560 --> 01:39:16,820 Thank you. 1082 01:39:16,940 --> 01:39:19,940 Yes, I think the technology is certainly available. 1083 01:39:20,300 --> 01:39:24,820 I think next year we will have a capacity to focus on something like that. 1084 01:39:25,020 --> 01:39:28,980 This year has been a major work effort for my department. 1085 01:39:29,520 --> 01:39:33,260 And Director Conrad is the department as well working together, 1086 01:39:33,460 --> 01:39:38,000 inspecting every single one of these thoroughly reviewing all of the insurance information, 1087 01:39:38,960 --> 01:39:42,540 house rules, significant amount of review information for each of these short 1088 01:39:43,300 --> 01:39:45,640 but next year we won't have to do all of that again. 1089 01:39:46,140 --> 01:39:50,860 Next year for the next three years properties will be able to self-certify a lot of that information. 1090 01:39:51,100 --> 01:39:56,420 So that's going to free at some time where we can look at some of those additional endeavours such as an app. 1091 01:39:58,800 --> 01:40:02,560 Thank you. I saw a lot of those apps down at that conference. 1092 01:40:02,700 --> 01:40:05,340 I was just up for the legal city so we may not have to invent. 1093 01:40:07,320 --> 01:40:10,020 I don't have any questions right now. I'll pass it down to my right. 1094 01:40:11,460 --> 01:40:26,480 Let's see, so with the penalties, $100, $200 and $500, and then with SB 60, we can increase those to 1500, $3,000 and $5,000. 1095 01:40:26,740 --> 01:40:30,160 Which one of those two scenarios is getting 100% cost recovery? 1096 01:40:34,630 --> 01:40:44,130 So citations aren't, they're set by state law, so it's not like our user fees where we do a fee study to determine what the cost of recovery is. 1097 01:40:44,470 --> 01:40:49,570 These are just the maximum citations we can impose under state law with the goal of achieving compliance. 1098 01:40:50,070 --> 01:40:50,830 Okay, thank you. 1099 01:40:53,510 --> 01:40:58,430 And they can't be initial failure to obtain permits, why not? 1100 01:40:59,150 --> 01:41:06,310 So, I can't say exactly what the legislature had in mind when they enacted it that way, 1101 01:41:06,470 --> 01:41:12,670 but if I had to guess, I would say because they are steep fines and there could be property 1102 01:41:12,670 --> 01:41:15,570 owners that claim they didn't realize that permits were required. 1103 01:41:15,890 --> 01:41:20,630 So for that, you know, the first time when we notify them saying you'd permit for this, 1104 01:41:20,770 --> 01:41:26,750 we can't impose these steep penalties until they're aware of that and continue to not comply. 1105 01:41:26,750 --> 01:41:37,310 Okay, and then well one thing I just wanted to ask if there is a way or do you think it would be more understandable? 1106 01:41:37,710 --> 01:41:39,350 Am I looking at the map wrong? 1107 01:41:39,990 --> 01:41:51,070 You showed the two maps and one, the one with the radius that shows the 175 foot radius has also includes the closed ones. 1108 01:41:51,070 --> 01:42:01,330 And to me, am I wrong, it might be helpful to see the other one with the radius too, with the closed ones taken out of it, because they're obsolete now, right? 1109 01:42:02,050 --> 01:42:10,990 No, thank you for the comment. You're 100% correct on that, and that is something I intended to do. We didn't have a chance to create that additional map, but you're correct. 1110 01:42:11,250 --> 01:42:13,070 Okay, maybe the next time or something. 1111 01:42:13,070 --> 01:42:22,750 And so did we include or have we addressed unhosted hotels because I feel like this was part 1112 01:42:22,750 --> 01:42:29,030 of the this original ask was the unhosted the definition of what is an unhosted hotel 1113 01:42:29,030 --> 01:42:32,270 and how are they because 1114 01:42:34,320 --> 01:42:40,480 it kind of gets into if all hotels become unhosted then what do we have 1115 01:42:40,480 --> 01:42:46,920 have anymore. You know, they're just kind of these buildings that are being run without 1116 01:42:46,920 --> 01:42:48,880 any oversight. And how are we? 1117 01:42:51,920 --> 01:42:57,740 So I'm hosted hotel. So I think the best way to describe 1118 01:42:57,740 --> 01:43:03,820 the difference between short-term rental and hosted hotel is a short-term rental is a 1119 01:43:03,820 --> 01:43:10,220 residential use. If you look at our zoning code, it's the finance of residential use, which 1120 01:43:10,220 --> 01:43:14,800 can be difficult to wrap mine around since it does operate similar to a hotel like a commercial 1121 01:43:14,800 --> 01:43:20,080 use but by definition it's the short term rental of a residential use versus the unhosted 1122 01:43:20,080 --> 01:43:29,700 hotel is commercial structure built to commercial code commercial use. So that's the distinction. 1123 01:43:30,300 --> 01:43:36,940 I think there is some overlap between the two you know there have been some smaller unhosted 1124 01:43:36,940 --> 01:43:41,540 hotels that the planning commission has approved over the last few years where they've added 1125 01:43:41,540 --> 01:43:46,700 a condition that requires the unhosted hotels to comply with all of the short-term rental 1126 01:43:46,700 --> 01:43:53,080 regulations since unhosted hotels do present similar impacts as short-term rentals. 1127 01:43:53,420 --> 01:43:59,340 So just like both unhosted hotels and short-term rentals, you don't have on-site property 1128 01:43:59,340 --> 01:44:04,420 manage are there and oftentimes on-site property managers, the most effective way to control 1129 01:44:04,420 --> 01:44:06,660 the guests and minimize impacts on neighbourhoods. 1130 01:44:06,780 --> 01:44:11,340 So I think there are some opportunities like that to incorporate as we review, you know, 1131 01:44:11,480 --> 01:44:15,640 development projects for unhosted hotels, incorporate the short-term rental regulations 1132 01:44:15,640 --> 01:44:18,800 as conditions of approval on those use permits. 1133 01:44:19,380 --> 01:44:25,040 Yeah, because if you had your commercial district, all the businesses, I mean, I think of downtown 1134 01:44:25,040 --> 01:44:29,580 San Luis and they don't have very many, like if Moro Bay became what that is with a lot 1135 01:44:29,580 --> 01:44:34,880 of vacancies, they could be turned into short term rentals or unhosted hotels that are 1136 01:44:34,880 --> 01:44:38,880 short term rentals, and you can have a real problem on your hands. 1137 01:44:40,280 --> 01:44:50,080 And then the difference between a unhosted hotel and a hotel, both in commercial district 1138 01:44:50,080 --> 01:44:52,120 the bed. One, two, three, four, five, four, five, four, five, four, five, four, five, 1139 01:45:00,000 --> 01:45:10,480 So that's sort of confusing, too. You know, that's right. There's, I mean, we have hosted hotels. It also advertised our B and B and B and B, so that's something that's really out of our control. Yeah. 1140 01:45:12,840 --> 01:45:28,840 And did, did, did any of this talk about a minimum requirement for revenue, you know, you have to meet a threshold of. That's in the short-term rental ordinance, $500 minimum, TOT, which we verify through this TR permit process. Okay. And then. 1141 01:45:28,840 --> 01:45:34,260 And this may be just kind of getting out there too much into the weeds and let me know 1142 01:45:34,260 --> 01:45:42,220 if it is, if it's a whole separate subject, I'm not sure, but a way that people evade 1143 01:45:42,220 --> 01:45:50,560 the permitting process for this is by listing 31 days at rental as 31 days. 1144 01:45:52,120 --> 01:45:56,520 And is there, you know, I was kind of just trying to look that up if there's other cities 1145 01:45:56,520 --> 01:46:02,660 that have, and this may be a question ultimately to include Mr. Stack, but is 1146 01:46:02,660 --> 01:46:10,960 there a way to try to keep that, you know, because that they're avoiding the 1147 01:46:10,960 --> 01:46:18,320 whole situation by purposely renting for 31 days, which is when we're trying to 1148 01:46:18,320 --> 01:46:22,420 protect neighborhoods, that's harmful to a neighborhood, but we're just there 1149 01:46:22,420 --> 01:46:23,840 under the rate of, you know what I mean? 1150 01:46:25,480 --> 01:46:28,120 So if a short-term rental is, you know, 1151 01:46:28,360 --> 01:46:31,740 legitimately renting for 31 days and not less than 30, 1152 01:46:32,100 --> 01:46:33,980 they're complying with the municipal code 1153 01:46:33,980 --> 01:46:35,960 there's really nothing the city can do 1154 01:46:35,960 --> 01:46:38,380 to enforce in that situation 1155 01:46:38,380 --> 01:46:40,060 because they're in compliance. 1156 01:46:41,680 --> 01:46:43,400 The greater concern is the ones 1157 01:46:43,400 --> 01:46:47,020 that are claiming to be operating for less than 30 1158 01:46:47,020 --> 01:46:49,440 but they find ways to work the system 1159 01:46:49,440 --> 01:46:52,060 to be able to actually run out for less than 30 days. 1160 01:46:52,060 --> 01:46:57,440 and those are getting more difficult to verify and enforce, but we're working hard at it. 1161 01:46:57,980 --> 01:46:58,860 Okay, thank you. 1162 01:47:02,940 --> 01:47:05,700 Excuse me, most have been answered, but two questions. 1163 01:47:06,420 --> 01:47:10,400 Are you sending out citations right now, and if so, are they being collected? 1164 01:47:11,660 --> 01:47:16,880 Yes, so we've collected several thousand dollars in citations from short-term rentals this year. 1165 01:47:17,920 --> 01:47:24,020 I will say the majority of citations that we issue are actually paid. 1166 01:47:24,660 --> 01:47:31,500 Sometimes they take a while, but eventually they pay and when they don't pay, we send them to the state franchise tax board and 1167 01:47:31,500 --> 01:47:38,680 the FTB adds our citation as a lien on their income tax return and they collect it through the income tax and pay the city that way. 1168 01:47:38,940 --> 01:47:40,380 So we do get paid. 1169 01:47:40,960 --> 01:47:45,860 Thank you. And then who hears the appeals? Is that your department? 1170 01:47:46,980 --> 01:47:52,980 So the sorts of mental ordinance specifically states that all appeals have to be heard by an independent third party. 1171 01:47:54,020 --> 01:47:57,140 And we've contacted a contractor with an attorney to provide that service. 1172 01:47:57,620 --> 01:47:57,880 Thank you. 1173 01:47:59,990 --> 01:48:01,710 Thank you. There's no further questions. 1174 01:48:01,950 --> 01:48:03,690 I will open public comment on this item. 1175 01:48:10,350 --> 01:48:11,550 Thank you very randomly. 1176 01:48:13,090 --> 01:48:24,110 This short-term vacation rental ordinance basically has the results of what when we adopted it has destroyed a neighborhood. 1177 01:48:24,110 --> 01:48:32,230 And for example, if you look at a beach colmar from Siena to Easter, one block long, there 1178 01:48:32,230 --> 01:48:37,110 are that I know for sure six short-term vacation rentals. 1179 01:48:37,630 --> 01:48:44,850 The difficulty is not only are there six there, there adjacent to one another on one end 1180 01:48:44,850 --> 01:48:46,770 and adjacent to another on the other end. 1181 01:48:46,770 --> 01:48:55,330 So basically, as we guys can all look back, this was a boon to some realters who turned 1182 01:48:55,330 --> 01:49:00,290 some properties either they owned or somebody owned and turned them into short-term vacation 1183 01:49:00,290 --> 01:49:00,870 rentals. 1184 01:49:01,430 --> 01:49:06,390 So I would like to see if there was an effort, this grandfather clause that you have, if 1185 01:49:06,390 --> 01:49:08,870 you're with a corporation, they'll never grandfather out. 1186 01:49:09,610 --> 01:49:16,390 So I'd like to see some way to look at it and say, all right, your short-term vacation rental 1187 01:49:16,390 --> 01:49:22,970 does not last forever. I need, I believe, we need to put some time limit on it and say okay, 1188 01:49:23,890 --> 01:49:29,050 three years, five years, some of these people in business on these properties for over five years. 1189 01:49:29,990 --> 01:49:34,570 And they've turned South Beach Cormor, which is a nice neighborhood, into a commercial zone. 1190 01:49:35,410 --> 01:49:44,930 And it's also on North Beach Cormor, it's just as bad. So the damage to our neighborhood is tremendous 1191 01:49:44,930 --> 01:49:48,110 and all the folks who live with the South in the time, 1192 01:49:48,530 --> 01:49:50,890 they don't see it, but these lots are small, 1193 01:49:51,030 --> 01:49:55,470 we're close together, and it exacerbates the problem. 1194 01:49:56,230 --> 01:50:00,390 And until we look at this, then it's just tragic. 1195 01:50:00,870 --> 01:50:04,170 I do know that there was one house on Beach Comer 1196 01:50:04,170 --> 01:50:05,070 that was just sold. 1197 01:50:05,850 --> 01:50:09,670 It's now no longer on the vacation rental, thank goodness. 1198 01:50:10,430 --> 01:50:13,070 But when they're next door to each other 1199 01:50:13,070 --> 01:50:17,570 because their grandfathered in, it just traumatizes 1200 01:50:17,570 --> 01:50:17,990 an neighborhood. 1201 01:50:18,590 --> 01:50:21,910 So to build this town, I know that all we get money for 1202 01:50:21,910 --> 01:50:23,690 and that pays for our, no, it doesn't. 1203 01:50:23,830 --> 01:50:27,550 It destroys the essence of moral bay. 1204 01:50:28,930 --> 01:50:32,170 We don't want to turn this town into an industrial part. 1205 01:50:32,410 --> 01:50:34,090 We have R1 zoning. 1206 01:50:34,990 --> 01:50:35,910 It's R1 zoning. 1207 01:50:36,230 --> 01:50:38,950 R1 zoning means R1 zoning, not commercial zoning. 1208 01:50:39,590 --> 01:50:41,890 So please, I know it's difficult to look at it, 1209 01:50:41,890 --> 01:50:44,790 but this is a voice of a resident that lives amongst it, 1210 01:50:44,870 --> 01:50:45,610 and it's not good. 1211 01:50:45,990 --> 01:50:46,270 Thank you. 1212 01:50:55,320 --> 01:50:56,980 Michelle Lester-Cattery, North Moral Bay. 1213 01:50:57,960 --> 01:51:00,300 I'll just piggyback on what Mary had to say. 1214 01:51:00,940 --> 01:51:04,240 It is destroying the neighborhood feel. 1215 01:51:05,520 --> 01:51:08,860 It's a constant turnover of strangers in our neighborhoods 1216 01:51:09,520 --> 01:51:10,380 with our children. 1217 01:51:12,440 --> 01:51:16,580 The ongoing destruction of our infrastructure, our streets, 1218 01:51:17,240 --> 01:51:23,460 the parking is an issue, most of these people will not adhere to the noise, you know, 1219 01:51:23,500 --> 01:51:30,040 our noise ordinances. And, you know, you don't want to call 911 at 1030, 11 o'clock at night, 1220 01:51:30,200 --> 01:51:35,840 because, you know, you're taxing, it's on our community resources, and I don't want to do that. Or, 1221 01:51:36,120 --> 01:51:42,280 you know, it's just, it's not acceptable. We need to try and work on grandfathering some of these out 1222 01:51:42,280 --> 01:51:46,620 and having a limited term on them because, like Barry said, 1223 01:51:46,800 --> 01:51:47,980 they're owned by corporations. 1224 01:51:49,260 --> 01:51:50,700 And which will go on forever? 1225 01:51:51,860 --> 01:51:54,000 The other thing is, again, the fire pit situation. 1226 01:51:54,260 --> 01:51:56,400 I know that Chief McRain has talked about it, 1227 01:51:56,480 --> 01:51:57,780 but they need to be phased out. 1228 01:51:58,020 --> 01:51:59,100 They need to go to propane. 1229 01:51:59,620 --> 01:52:00,960 We don't need the extra risk. 1230 01:52:01,420 --> 01:52:04,240 We don't need the extra taxing on our homeowners insurance 1231 01:52:04,240 --> 01:52:05,360 because of these. 1232 01:52:06,620 --> 01:52:10,360 I just think that the city could, you know, possibly increase the 1233 01:52:12,040 --> 01:52:18,120 And again, grandfather, take a look at that area of the ordinance. 1234 01:52:18,560 --> 01:52:18,820 Thank you. 1235 01:52:27,330 --> 01:52:31,050 I would like to say Betty Winholz, amen to the previous two speakers. 1236 01:52:31,790 --> 01:52:40,150 We know that some people are individual owners, but there are like in my name I heard some of the zones three or four. 1237 01:52:40,770 --> 01:52:44,750 So I very much support the idea of looking at the grandfathering. 1238 01:52:44,750 --> 01:53:04,350 And because of that and because of the nature of people have bought houses specifically to rent them out to me that borders on what was talked about earlier as the difference between an unhosted hotel and a vacation rental because they've bought in to make it a commercial in our residents. 1239 01:53:05,030 --> 01:53:13,890 So that's why very much believe that unhosted hotels should be considered vacation rentals and that they should have to abide by the same rules. 1240 01:53:13,890 --> 01:53:19,450 And in commercial they're unlimited so it doesn't matter but they need to have those stricter appliances. 1241 01:53:20,250 --> 01:53:27,090 So in terms of the other requirement or questions that were asked of you, definitely do not start. 1242 01:53:27,150 --> 01:53:34,970 I would not until you're completely finished with your evaluation of allowing more people from the list to go and 1243 01:53:34,970 --> 01:53:39,250 become new vacation renters hotel, you know. 1244 01:53:39,250 --> 01:53:47,250 And I would, of course, unhost the in-home people are great, and there's fewer of them, 1245 01:53:47,310 --> 01:53:52,970 but maybe more people will consider that as we have single older people living in large houses. 1246 01:53:54,270 --> 01:54:01,770 The other thing I wanted to say, and I'm going to remember it, is that I also very much believe in raising the fees. 1247 01:54:02,610 --> 01:54:13,730 So, looking at the grandfathering given a timeline, considering vacation rentals as duplicates 1248 01:54:13,730 --> 01:54:18,790 of unhosted hotels, we've got one coming up before the planning commission soon, so that 1249 01:54:18,790 --> 01:54:25,990 will be interesting, and then raising the fees and do not raise the limit or allow more 1250 01:54:25,990 --> 01:54:30,930 people to come in, because you all, when this comes back after the end of the year, and Mr. 1251 01:54:30,930 --> 01:54:36,430 single spin finish his presentation do you even want to stay at the 175 or you 1252 01:54:36,430 --> 01:54:38,650 going to look at reducing that. Thanks. 1253 01:54:42,060 --> 01:54:43,820 Anyone else for a public comment on this 1254 01:54:43,820 --> 01:54:44,040 item? 1255 01:54:51,090 --> 01:54:55,190 Jeff Heller. I was on council when this ordinance was passed and I thought it 1256 01:54:55,190 --> 01:54:58,610 was out that all of these homes were grandfathered in. 1257 01:54:59,190 --> 01:55:04,870 Lososos has a limit of 55 short term vacation rentals and a 500 foot buffer. 1258 01:55:05,550 --> 01:55:09,850 That seems reasonable to me. I'd like to see two-thirds of the number licenses 1259 01:55:09,850 --> 01:55:15,830 is pulled. There are two ways to do it. I think the SB 60 might be a little extreme, but I have 1260 01:55:15,830 --> 01:55:21,510 no problem with adding it as zero to each of the figures that were useful. And we need 1261 01:55:21,510 --> 01:55:27,650 to implement some way that licenses can be revoked. In other words, neighbors should have 1262 01:55:27,650 --> 01:55:33,750 the phone number for the local representative who's supposed to bond with an hour and resolve 1263 01:55:33,750 --> 01:55:39,690 all the issue. Let the neighbors, police, their neighborhood document it. Are the issues 1264 01:55:39,690 --> 01:55:45,290 getting resolved within an hour or are they not? The representative come, the party 1265 01:55:45,290 --> 01:55:50,750 quiets down, the representative drives away, the party starts again. If some authority to 1266 01:55:50,750 --> 01:55:56,130 the neighbors to rescind licenses that they continually are disturbed by the parking, the 1267 01:55:56,130 --> 01:56:01,950 noise, whatever, fines are great, but we've got to reduce the number. The number is just 1268 01:56:01,950 --> 01:56:06,070 completely unacceptable. You can start in Southern California to work your way 1269 01:56:06,070 --> 01:56:10,310 up the coast of all the beach towns that have been destroyed by short-term 1270 01:56:10,310 --> 01:56:14,650 vacation rentals. We want an aggressive policy to take a look at Palm Springs. 1271 01:56:15,430 --> 01:56:20,250 They have a very robust program, but I think they have more revenue than we do, too. 1272 01:56:20,870 --> 01:56:23,670 But there's some clauses in the way they're operating that I think is 1273 01:56:23,670 --> 01:56:27,990 outstanding. Very stringent, and they shut them down. That's the direction we need 1274 01:56:27,990 --> 01:56:33,270 to go in if we want to try and get the neighborhood back that we had just a few 1275 01:56:33,270 --> 01:56:35,410 years ago so thank you. 1276 01:56:38,980 --> 01:56:42,320 Anyone else for public comment on this item? AGP are 1277 01:56:42,320 --> 01:56:46,580 there any raised hands in the queue? Yes Madam Mayor we have one speaker raising 1278 01:56:46,580 --> 01:56:50,000 their hand Maggie Jiren. I'm going to allow you to talk. Go ahead. 1279 01:56:54,940 --> 01:56:55,880 Hi can you hear 1280 01:56:55,880 --> 01:57:01,920 me? Yeah. You can't hear me. We can hear you. We can hear you. Go ahead. Oh okay 1281 01:57:01,920 --> 01:57:08,700 Okay, okay. Well, hi, my name is Maggie Juren, and I'm here to present the other side of what some of the speakers have said. 1282 01:57:09,420 --> 01:57:14,100 Along with my partners, we own beach and bay getaways and new relax vacation rentals. 1283 01:57:14,880 --> 01:57:22,820 First of all, I want to say that for our companies, the SDR permitting process has gone pretty smoothly, and I especially want to thank the city staff and 1284 01:57:22,820 --> 01:57:29,700 fire department that have been working on this process. They've been easy to work with and very helpful with any questions we have had. 1285 01:57:29,700 --> 01:57:35,480 Needless to say, we are ready to be done with this because of the time consuming process. 1286 01:57:35,600 --> 01:57:40,580 It has been for our staff, but I also feel like it has been very effective in identifying 1287 01:57:40,580 --> 01:57:44,420 which STRs are actually active and paying money to the city. 1288 01:57:45,180 --> 01:57:50,040 I know there has been talk and there was tonight again in previous council meetings about 1289 01:57:50,040 --> 01:57:56,140 the possibility of reducing the 175 permit limit for residential non-hosted rentals, but 1290 01:57:56,140 --> 01:58:01,900 But I am here to ask that this limit not be reduced, and in my opinion, it is not necessary 1291 01:58:01,900 --> 01:58:03,700 to reduce it, and here is why. 1292 01:58:04,700 --> 01:58:07,520 There is and will continue to be natural attrition. 1293 01:58:07,980 --> 01:58:12,720 Since the new regulations went into effect, our company has lost seven homes from our more 1294 01:58:12,720 --> 01:58:18,020 way inventory, mostly due to the non-transference of the license upon sale of the home. 1295 01:58:18,700 --> 01:58:24,880 The loss of revenue to the city from these homes is conservatively estimated 30,000 a year. 1296 01:58:25,980 --> 01:58:31,560 Also, due to the 175-foot proximity rule, there will be many of the wait list homes that 1297 01:58:31,560 --> 01:58:34,760 will not qualify for a license based on that regulation. 1298 01:58:35,220 --> 01:58:39,980 So I would anticipate that it could take years before the number would reach, the number 1299 01:58:39,980 --> 01:58:42,920 of SDRs would reach 175. 1300 01:58:44,160 --> 01:58:50,420 And please note, compared to other cities that have tourism as their primary industry, Moral 1301 01:58:50,420 --> 01:58:54,880 Bay has a very low percentage of the total housing units that are SDRs, 1302 01:58:55,160 --> 01:58:56,740 contrary to what someone presented. 1303 01:58:57,540 --> 01:59:01,440 Although you may be sick of hearing me say this, it is important to recognize 1304 01:59:01,440 --> 01:59:06,080 that almost all of the licensed SDRs and those on the homes on the wait list 1305 01:59:06,080 --> 01:59:09,080 would not convert to long-term residential housing. 1306 01:59:09,340 --> 01:59:12,140 Because the owners purchased them for their own use as well, 1307 01:59:12,620 --> 01:59:16,680 and many of them would need to command a rent amount that would exceed any working 1308 01:59:16,680 --> 01:59:19,680 person, anything that any working person could afford. 1309 01:59:20,500 --> 01:59:25,560 As has been stated so many times before, the housing shortage in Moro Bay is largely due 1310 01:59:25,560 --> 01:59:30,080 to the high percentage of second homes, some of which are probably the source of noise 1311 01:59:30,080 --> 01:59:32,940 disturbances that our community experiences. 1312 01:59:33,780 --> 01:59:38,860 I was part of the original citizens community that drafted the current regulations, and the 1313 01:59:38,860 --> 01:59:44,480 process was a very fair one, and I'm very still very proud of the checks and balances that 1314 01:59:44,480 --> 01:59:46,400 that were integrated into these regulations. 1315 01:59:46,960 --> 01:59:51,560 So I just ask that the council members please let these regulations achieve their purpose, 1316 01:59:51,920 --> 01:59:54,180 which is to create a fair balance of providing 1317 02:00:06,840 --> 02:00:25,900 And as a last note, just to answer a question that was brought up about the 30-day rentals, please note that this is set by the state of California Department of regulation. And so that is granted. That's property rights. Thank you. And thank you for listening. 1318 02:00:35,160 --> 02:00:55,740 I have a question regarding I know when I have my town hall meeting and I don't think I've talked about I've asked about this very much but I'm something reminded me about that tonight is there are instances where 1319 02:00:55,740 --> 02:00:59,040 There are certain people have multiple short-term rentals. 1320 02:00:59,560 --> 02:01:03,120 And I'm not talking about the realitors that are advertising them and managing them. 1321 02:01:03,120 --> 02:01:04,860 I'm talking about property owners. 1322 02:01:05,600 --> 02:01:11,080 And I know that in other cities it's become a problem where like a corporation or 1323 02:01:11,080 --> 02:01:17,080 something like that will come in and just buy houses to turn them into short-term rentals. 1324 02:01:17,820 --> 02:01:20,280 And are we monitoring that at all? 1325 02:01:22,840 --> 02:01:30,740 So the city more a city of more obeys sort of rental ordinance does not prohibit an individual from owning multiple sort of rentals. 1326 02:01:30,740 --> 02:01:34,820 Would you have some individuals who own a few short-term rentals within the city. 1327 02:01:35,440 --> 02:01:45,340 I was involved in drafting Lososos, Lososos is sort of rental ordinance that does actually have a prohibition on an individual owning multiple SCRs. 1328 02:01:45,380 --> 02:01:48,680 But the city of more obeys ordinance does not have that same provision. 1329 02:01:49,320 --> 02:02:00,840 Okay. Thank you. And let's see, grandfathering out the time limit. Let's see, that was my 1330 02:02:00,840 --> 02:02:07,740 note. I don't even know why I wrote that. But was that based on a question that someone 1331 02:02:07,740 --> 02:02:13,140 brought up, I think? If I, can I respond to public comment? I may actually get to the question 1332 02:02:13,140 --> 02:02:14,340 in that you had on that. 1333 02:02:15,880 --> 02:02:18,980 So regarding the concentration of short-term rentals 1334 02:02:18,980 --> 02:02:20,080 in our residential neighborhoods, 1335 02:02:20,320 --> 02:02:24,540 I just want to say that I agree with the public commenters, 1336 02:02:24,660 --> 02:02:26,720 absolutely that significantly changes 1337 02:02:26,720 --> 02:02:28,340 the character of a residential neighborhood 1338 02:02:28,340 --> 02:02:31,120 when you have high concentrations of short-term rentals 1339 02:02:31,120 --> 02:02:35,020 with visitors coming and going throughout the week 1340 02:02:35,020 --> 02:02:39,140 that absolutely diminishes the residential character 1341 02:02:39,140 --> 02:02:52,740 of a neighborhood, which is the purpose of that 155-foot buffer requirement to over time through attrition and reduce the concentration and really restore the residential character of those neighborhoods. 1342 02:02:53,680 --> 02:03:02,260 As we heard one, you know, speaker state, the short-term rental ordinance does not allow short-term rental permits to transfer with ownership. 1343 02:03:02,260 --> 02:03:08,640 I think that is a key element where the number will come down through attrition, and that is a real 1344 02:03:09,900 --> 02:03:13,780 success of our short-term rental permit process because every one of these 1345 02:03:13,780 --> 02:03:22,880 properties now has to come in for their annual renewal permit, and we do a very thorough title check on each one of these properties when they come in for the renewal permit, and there has been 1346 02:03:23,740 --> 02:03:32,200 one or two that we've already denied because when we did a detailed title search we found that the property had transferred in the past, and so 1347 02:03:32,260 --> 02:03:34,440 at that point in time, they should have lost their right 1348 02:03:34,440 --> 02:03:35,580 to continue that STR. 1349 02:03:35,740 --> 02:03:36,880 So we are enforcing that. 1350 02:03:37,540 --> 02:03:41,120 And given enough time, the concentration will come down 1351 02:03:41,120 --> 02:03:43,880 by attrition, and our short-term rental permit process 1352 02:03:43,880 --> 02:03:46,340 is going to ensure that. 1353 02:03:48,240 --> 02:03:51,060 I think also there is some confusion 1354 02:03:53,180 --> 02:03:55,740 between the grandfather short-term rentals 1355 02:03:55,740 --> 02:03:58,180 and illegally operating short-term rentals. 1356 02:03:58,180 --> 02:03:59,760 So just to clarify, 1357 02:03:59,760 --> 02:04:05,380 There are grandfathered properties that under the current ordinance have a right to continue. 1358 02:04:05,740 --> 02:04:09,380 So they're legal, they have to get their annual permits from us to go through their inspections. 1359 02:04:09,400 --> 02:04:13,940 But they have a legal right to continue, not indefinitely, because again, 1360 02:04:14,040 --> 02:04:17,020 it won't transfer with ownership, but they do have a right to continue. 1361 02:04:17,380 --> 02:04:20,480 Then of course, there's the illegally operating ones, and 1362 02:04:20,480 --> 02:04:24,360 those are the ones that we are sending season assist orders on. 1363 02:04:24,540 --> 02:04:28,180 And even though I mentioned earlier, there are some challenges with enforcement. 1364 02:04:28,180 --> 02:04:36,220 we will close them all down and just finally there was a comment about a upcoming 1365 02:04:36,220 --> 02:04:41,960 unhosted hotel project that was a reference I believe to 1180 Front Street 1366 02:04:41,960 --> 02:04:47,880 10 room unhosted hotel. I just want to bring that up as a good example of a 1367 02:04:47,880 --> 02:04:51,500 project where it requires a coastal development permit is going to go to 1368 02:04:51,500 --> 02:04:56,680 planning commission and the planning commission can add a condition that 1369 02:04:56,680 --> 02:05:01,360 that requires that hotel to obtain an SCR permit and comply with all of the SCR regulations. 1370 02:05:01,360 --> 02:05:04,520 That's something we can address through the permitting process on this. 1371 02:05:09,860 --> 02:05:15,220 One question you mentioned, and I do agree with the character of neighborhoods. 1372 02:05:16,040 --> 02:05:22,120 If I live next to seven short term rentals, I'd be upset too. 1373 02:05:22,300 --> 02:05:24,220 So you said that they have the legal right. 1374 02:05:25,340 --> 02:05:30,140 The legal right is based on the ordinance that was passed two years ago. 1375 02:05:30,140 --> 02:05:31,300 Is that correct or incorrect? 1376 02:05:33,060 --> 02:05:45,520 In other words, if we were looking at changing the ordinance to take some of these legal license short-term rentals that were granted as grandfathered in, 1377 02:05:47,120 --> 02:05:55,680 you made a statement just a minute ago that they have the legal right to operate, which is true to the ordinance that is in place right now. 1378 02:05:55,680 --> 02:06:06,100 If we chose at a later date, that's not what we're here for today, to change that ordinance, would that then preclude them to operate, yes or no? 1379 02:06:08,300 --> 02:06:15,500 Well, so I will say that, yes, when I say they have a legal right to continue to operate, I mean, under the current ordinance. 1380 02:06:15,780 --> 02:06:21,120 And I don't know if the city attorney may want to comment on, you know, other options. 1381 02:06:22,340 --> 02:06:28,300 Yeah, Brightseck, City Attorney, to the extent that the, this Council or 1382 02:06:28,300 --> 02:06:31,320 a future council seeks to amend the S.D.R. 1383 02:06:31,340 --> 02:06:36,860 ordinance to limit the time period of the grandfathering outside of the, it can't transfer. 1384 02:06:37,240 --> 02:06:42,900 We would have to do, you know, a legal analysis of does this a fringe in fringe upon, say, a personal right? 1385 02:06:43,400 --> 02:06:44,720 Or is it a property right? 1386 02:06:45,020 --> 02:06:50,760 The way the city has constructed it, it has done its best to make it clear that it's not considered 1387 02:06:50,760 --> 02:06:55,900 a land use permit and land use entitlement that it doesn't run with a land that it's a personal 1388 02:06:55,900 --> 02:07:01,340 right. And so that takes the judicial scrutiny down a notch, but it's still even at a personal 1389 02:07:01,340 --> 02:07:06,120 right level. We might have to account for, okay, we'd have to give them some period of time to 1390 02:07:06,120 --> 02:07:12,500 wind down, but the exact time period would depend on specific circumstances and what the amendment 1391 02:07:12,500 --> 02:07:17,220 might look like. But it's definitely an issue that would need to be analyzed and included 1392 02:07:17,220 --> 02:07:17,860 in the staff report. 1393 02:07:17,860 --> 02:07:19,400 I see it's curious on that. 1394 02:07:22,820 --> 02:07:23,280 Questions? 1395 02:07:24,100 --> 02:07:24,520 Thank you. 1396 02:07:24,980 --> 02:07:29,900 Thank you, Mr. Singh-Wald for that very detailed report. 1397 02:07:32,050 --> 02:07:36,630 I will say that as I walk the neighborhoods in North Moral Bay and the beach track both, 1398 02:07:37,190 --> 02:07:41,810 I appreciate that since this has, since you've taken this over and taken this on, 1399 02:07:42,150 --> 02:07:43,850 I see so much more compliancy. 1400 02:07:43,990 --> 02:07:47,370 There's vacation homes I didn't even know existed because now they're signs are up, 1401 02:07:47,370 --> 02:07:57,250 which is allowing an opportunity for checks and balances for neighbors that are in those beach tracks and North Moral Bay even in the residential beds. 1402 02:07:59,010 --> 02:08:15,570 The grandfather is a challenge, and that was done by past councils, and yeah, I think we could have a whole different conversation about that, but I think a way to approach it rather than trying to find a way to undo something they did right now is to just look at it through attrition. 1403 02:08:15,570 --> 02:08:32,430 And if our desire ultimately and not tonight would be to lower those numbers down that there would probably be different paths and could incorporate so that, you know, I don't there's no future grandfathering was very self serving the people who did that I feel. 1404 02:08:34,090 --> 02:08:38,350 We know how many home shares are on the list. Is that separate? 1405 02:08:38,670 --> 02:08:42,430 I think 11 requests for home share permits right now. 1406 02:08:46,030 --> 02:08:48,710 So you're asking how many home shares are on the wait list? 1407 02:08:48,830 --> 02:08:48,930 Yes. 1408 02:08:51,290 --> 02:08:57,870 So home shares wouldn't be on the wait list because that's a wait list for the full home 1409 02:08:57,870 --> 02:09:00,470 residential because those are the one subject to the cap. 1410 02:09:03,150 --> 02:09:09,990 The only thing preventing the city from issuing new SCR permits for home shares is the fact 1411 02:09:09,990 --> 02:09:17,550 the council said not to issue any residential SCRs and you'll let's say we get through this audit year and council 1412 02:09:17,550 --> 02:09:25,250 Does authorize new home share SCR permits to be authorized anyone who wants one can get one because there's no there's no cap 1413 02:09:25,250 --> 02:09:30,810 So they're just on the list with everybody else right now because we paused right so again 1414 02:09:30,810 --> 02:09:36,650 There's there's no need to put them on a list because there's no there's no limit to the number right home shares allowed 1415 02:09:37,810 --> 02:09:38,770 Thank you 1416 02:09:47,670 --> 02:09:53,550 I just wanted to ask one question about, so I've been kind of researching it on the 1417 02:09:53,550 --> 02:10:03,090 fly and there's such a thing as a mid-term stays, which are rentals that are 90 days, 1418 02:10:03,790 --> 02:10:16,650 which are registered like short-term rentals to prevent people that are working with that loophole where they say that they're over 30 days, but they're really a short-term rental. 1419 02:10:17,850 --> 02:10:29,610 And I don't know if that's like a fully vetted legal thing that we could do or I just would wonder if Mr. Stack knows anything about that. 1420 02:10:29,610 --> 02:10:35,270 Yeah, Brandt's actually the attorney, the law is always trying to catch up to what changes are on the ground. 1421 02:10:36,330 --> 02:10:43,890 A public speaker did refer to the concept that you're, they call it, and it's legally kind of but a bundle of sticks. 1422 02:10:43,890 --> 02:10:48,610 When you own real property, there's a variety of rights you have, one of which is to rent the property out. 1423 02:10:49,230 --> 02:10:59,330 And there is past case law that talks about generally, you can't restrict monthly rentals of property because maybe back at some point in time there was a reason to do that. 1424 02:10:59,330 --> 02:11:06,570 That was maybe inappropriate, but so now as things change and say there is a new type of use 1425 02:11:06,570 --> 02:11:09,890 Could a court look at it differently maybe, you know 1426 02:11:09,890 --> 02:11:13,630 It really would be it would depend on on the facts and circumstances and 1427 02:11:14,470 --> 02:11:17,170 You know reasonable investment back to expectations 1428 02:11:17,170 --> 02:11:21,730 So it would be to the extent that we're trying to keep the law caught up to real life 1429 02:11:21,730 --> 02:11:28,390 It's gonna be cutting edge and we'll have to have the facts and analysis and do our best if we want to try and address it 1430 02:11:28,390 --> 02:11:32,010 But there's not the clarity on, yes, this will work or not. 1431 02:11:32,950 --> 02:11:48,150 There might be some things to stay away from for sure, but you might be in a gray area that might dictate how much time or resources you'd want to invest in something that might not work or create a legal challenge. 1432 02:11:49,030 --> 02:11:57,370 So I haven't looked into it yet personally, but I do know generally, yes, there is the concept out there that we can't restrict more than 30-day rentals. 1433 02:11:57,930 --> 02:12:07,290 But that case law is, you know, from a period ago that, again, things have changed, maybe that case law would change under the new circumstances. 1434 02:12:07,750 --> 02:12:10,210 But I can't say, for sure, right now, I'm not having the analysis. 1435 02:12:10,490 --> 02:12:10,830 Thank you. 1436 02:12:15,960 --> 02:12:17,260 Yeah, just my final comment. 1437 02:12:17,440 --> 02:12:25,680 Thank you. I appreciate the methodology that you've spelled out for us at the beginning of the year of taking this quarterly approach. 1438 02:12:25,840 --> 02:12:29,380 And we've seen the ramp up in enforcement and good job. 1439 02:12:29,700 --> 02:12:30,000 Thank you. 1440 02:12:35,030 --> 02:12:44,290 I just want to echo that, this is great work, your continued effort on this is really 1441 02:12:44,290 --> 02:12:46,130 good, Mr. Singhwald. 1442 02:12:47,270 --> 02:12:55,790 I appreciate the process, and I think the process is waddling out the ones that are not 1443 02:12:55,790 --> 02:13:04,830 clients and wrongdoers and for me, I'm not at this moment about lowering where we are. 1444 02:13:05,010 --> 02:13:08,130 It seems to be lowering by attrition already on its own. 1445 02:13:08,670 --> 02:13:12,550 And I kind of like to see the process work a little bit longer. 1446 02:13:13,290 --> 02:13:16,930 For me, I think there's a balance that we need to find right now. 1447 02:13:17,430 --> 02:13:22,370 I don't know if I'm necessarily interested in allowing for 1448 02:13:22,370 --> 02:13:27,170 for other residentials at this moment in time, I leave that for discussion, of course. 1449 02:13:28,310 --> 02:13:35,170 But the home shares, I don't personally see the issue as to why we went along for that. 1450 02:13:35,450 --> 02:13:42,190 I know at the previous meeting we allowed for commercial to be given permitting. 1451 02:13:42,570 --> 02:13:46,310 So I think maybe we wanted to discuss the home share part. 1452 02:13:46,310 --> 02:13:52,250 I think that because the, as he just alluded to, the home share falls under the regular vacation. 1453 02:13:52,250 --> 02:13:58,790 I don't know where the commercial is exempt from that because it's not in the residential neighborhoods is that? 1454 02:13:59,650 --> 02:14:15,630 So let me clarify, so the cap of 175 SDR citywide applies to full home residential, both commercially-zoned SDRs, which the council already authorized, new permits to be issued for. 1455 02:14:15,630 --> 02:14:18,550 and home shares are not subject to the cap. 1456 02:14:18,790 --> 02:14:21,290 So whether it's tonight or in January, 1457 02:14:21,290 --> 02:14:24,950 the council could authorize new SCR permits for home shares 1458 02:14:24,950 --> 02:14:27,390 that anyone who wants one would be able to apply 1459 02:14:27,390 --> 02:14:29,870 for a permit and as long as they meet the code, 1460 02:14:30,050 --> 02:14:31,350 we would issue a permit and they can operate. 1461 02:14:32,410 --> 02:14:36,050 I think I like the idea of letting them finish up 1462 02:14:36,050 --> 02:14:38,570 to January and coming back and we can address all this. 1463 02:14:39,610 --> 02:14:42,410 I did think and correct me. 1464 02:14:42,910 --> 02:14:44,690 I thought we had already given direction 1465 02:14:47,790 --> 02:14:52,970 I thought at our last meeting we had already done that, if not, if not, I would entertain 1466 02:14:52,970 --> 02:14:53,850 that question. 1467 02:14:54,030 --> 02:14:54,750 I thought we did too. 1468 02:14:54,750 --> 02:14:59,090 Tonight, I certainly would be in favor of provided direction on and out. 1469 02:15:00,000 --> 02:15:02,040 Going to SB 16. Yeah. 1470 02:15:04,740 --> 02:15:10,420 So thank you for that, and I apologize if that was previous council 1471 02:15:10,420 --> 02:15:15,560 message. And I know the question came up last time. I know it's been discussed. I expected 1472 02:15:15,560 --> 02:15:19,880 it to come up again tonight, which is why I added that option in the staff report. We 1473 02:15:19,880 --> 02:15:24,540 just wanted to make sure it's very clear that we're getting that direction from council. 1474 02:15:24,600 --> 02:15:28,580 So we can go and put the resources into preparing an ordinance that bring it back for adoption. 1475 02:15:28,580 --> 02:15:29,820 and we will now do that. 1476 02:15:30,540 --> 02:15:32,120 Thank you very much, Mr. Simwell. 1477 02:15:32,760 --> 02:15:35,600 Another met them, we'll see this again in January, correct? 1478 02:15:36,940 --> 02:15:37,220 Correct. 1479 02:15:37,740 --> 02:15:41,500 Yeah, I really appreciate them. 1480 02:15:42,400 --> 02:15:45,780 I think Decker has been 100 times better than HDL, that's for sure. 1481 02:15:45,980 --> 02:15:49,080 So thank you for making that change and bringing this forward. 1482 02:15:50,400 --> 02:15:53,800 We have one item left on the agenda that I know we all want to get through, 1483 02:15:53,900 --> 02:15:55,020 but how about a five-minute resume? 1484 02:15:59,170 --> 02:16:01,630 Thank you for joining us as we resume. 1485 02:16:01,630 --> 02:16:13,450 No more on our last item of the evening, item 8D, discussion and request for direction regarding potential of establishing a local campaign finance contribution limits. 1486 02:16:13,970 --> 02:16:16,950 Now, we'll turn it over to our city attorney and city clerk. 1487 02:16:17,570 --> 02:16:19,130 Good evening, Mayor and council member. 1488 02:16:19,910 --> 02:16:22,950 I do have a brief PowerPoint, if you could pull it up. 1489 02:16:23,290 --> 02:16:24,610 PGA PowerPoint, thank you. 1490 02:16:25,110 --> 02:16:25,930 That's my first PowerPoint. 1491 02:16:27,530 --> 02:16:32,730 So I try to make it brief, to give a little background, some key takeaways, and then 1492 02:16:32,730 --> 02:16:35,130 kind of outline potential options for further direction. 1493 02:16:36,430 --> 02:16:37,030 Next slide, please. 1494 02:16:40,600 --> 02:16:46,600 As background, this discussion item is the result of council direction back in December 2024, 1495 02:16:46,600 --> 02:17:15,720 which followed election results of the initiative measure a 24, which had received significant public involvement and there were large cash and kind contributions and the city does not have any local campaign contribution limits and historically there have been no campaign contribution limits applicable to local agencies under state law so for a long period of time there were no campaign contribution limits. 1496 02:17:15,720 --> 02:17:24,940 campaigns. Campaign finance laws generally, there we go, stay on this slide for now. From 1497 02:17:24,940 --> 02:17:29,240 the local to federal government have faced legal challenges over the years, primarily 1498 02:17:29,240 --> 02:17:34,520 based on First Amendment protections, and that has resulted in some Supreme Court case 1499 02:17:34,520 --> 02:17:42,440 precedent which kind of helped outline the go and no-go areas for regulation of campaign 1500 02:17:42,440 --> 02:17:49,300 finance. And in addition, under state law, so long as it complies with the federal constitution, 1501 02:17:49,580 --> 02:17:56,940 they can also impose further restrictions on local agencies. And next slide, please. 1502 02:17:58,340 --> 02:18:08,120 In January, effective January 2021, AB 55571 established the default limits on local campaign 1503 02:18:08,120 --> 02:18:14,960 contributions and these were applicable on candidate-controlled committees only and 1504 02:18:14,960 --> 02:18:20,100 the amount gets updated by anally for inflation and the limit is currently $5,900. 1505 02:18:21,980 --> 02:18:28,440 AB 571 does allow local jurisdictions to establish their own limits, including establishing 1506 02:18:28,440 --> 02:18:30,800 a lower limit, a higher limit, or no limit. 1507 02:18:31,660 --> 02:18:37,340 If no limit, local limits have been imposed, then the state default would apply. 1508 02:18:37,340 --> 02:18:38,280 Next slide, please. 1509 02:18:40,560 --> 02:18:50,120 AB 571 operates within an area of campaign finance law which has been upheld by the Supreme Court and that's specific to candidate-controlled committees. 1510 02:18:50,960 --> 02:19:05,920 These have been upheld by the Supreme Court based on a determination that they impose a lower restriction on speech and serve an important interest of preventing corruption or the appearance of corruption like pay to play type schemes. 1511 02:19:05,920 --> 02:19:12,800 However, the Supreme Court has rejected limitations on independent expenditures by organizations, 1512 02:19:13,140 --> 02:19:20,360 associations, committees, unaffiliated with a candidate, and they have also similarly rejected 1513 02:19:20,360 --> 02:19:29,160 limits on ballot measures, finding both restrictions in both those cases impose significant limitations 1514 02:19:29,160 --> 02:19:32,360 on speech and do not have the same risk of corruption. 1515 02:19:32,360 --> 02:19:38,620 For example, the Supreme Court has said for independent expenditures, they lack the pre-arrangement 1516 02:19:38,620 --> 02:19:42,060 and coordination that could lead to quid pro quo type scenarios. 1517 02:19:42,980 --> 02:19:48,720 For ballot measures, the Supreme Court has said those are about issues and not candidates. 1518 02:19:49,380 --> 02:19:56,400 And so in those cases, the Supreme Court didn't find compelling nexus to preventing corruption. 1519 02:19:57,280 --> 02:19:58,000 Next slide, please. 1520 02:19:58,000 --> 02:19:59,120 Staff 1521 02:20:02,890 --> 02:20:09,450 has provided a few alternatives for council consideration when it comes to regulating 1522 02:20:09,450 --> 02:20:12,390 contributions to local candidate-controlled committees. 1523 02:20:13,370 --> 02:20:18,750 Staff does not recommend considering local limits on independent expenditures or ballot 1524 02:20:18,750 --> 02:20:23,990 measures because of the established Supreme Court precedent, but when it comes to local 1525 02:20:23,990 --> 02:20:28,050 candidate-controlled committees where the law is clear you would have the legal authority 1526 02:20:28,050 --> 02:20:29,290 42 imposed local limits. 1527 02:20:30,090 --> 02:20:33,550 The options set forth include taking no action 1528 02:20:34,330 --> 02:20:37,490 and letting the state default limits continue to apply, 1529 02:20:37,790 --> 02:20:41,470 and those would be enforced by the Fair Political Practices Commission. 1530 02:20:42,470 --> 02:20:48,350 Or council could direct staff to bring back a proposed local ordinance 1531 02:20:48,890 --> 02:20:54,810 that could provide limits on contributions such as below $1,000, 1532 02:20:54,810 --> 02:20:59,490 which may simplify, simplify reporting requirements for campaigns. 1533 02:21:00,850 --> 02:21:05,190 A $500 figure or a threshold could also be established, 1534 02:21:05,410 --> 02:21:10,670 which is the current trigger for disclosure and recusal under the Levine Act. 1535 02:21:11,190 --> 02:21:16,070 And that's where if you have a campaign contribution for the next 12 months, 1536 02:21:16,070 --> 02:21:20,650 generally speaking, that you could not hear a land use permit for that, 1537 02:21:21,190 --> 02:21:22,070 regarding that contributor. 1538 02:21:22,070 --> 02:21:30,750 So, that is a limit that some local jurisdictions have imposed in the idea of not having deal 1539 02:21:30,750 --> 02:21:31,750 with that issue, right? 1540 02:21:33,030 --> 02:21:39,810 And then another option would be to establish no campaign contribution limits so there 1541 02:21:39,810 --> 02:21:43,150 would be no local or state enforcement because there would be no limits. 1542 02:21:45,010 --> 02:21:47,750 That is the, this concludes the next slide. 1543 02:21:47,750 --> 02:21:54,670 This concludes staff's presentation, I'm available for any questions and also the city clerk is available for questions if any about reporting. 1544 02:21:56,570 --> 02:21:59,910 And I look forward for Council of Direction and discussion. 1545 02:22:00,730 --> 02:22:06,350 Thank you for bringing this and doing that a little bit of research to see where we go with this. I have a couple questions. 1546 02:22:08,170 --> 02:22:25,630 was my understanding that if you received a $500 or more donation from a donor and then you were to hear an item based on just simplicity of a land use issue, you could return the money in here the item is that you could return the donation in here the item. 1547 02:22:30,010 --> 02:22:38,850 I think part of it goes to intent, if you're unaware and you happen to vote on something I think my understanding is the law does provide you a grace period to return the money. 1548 02:22:39,310 --> 02:22:50,170 I think if you know someone has contributed, I don't believe there's an option to return the funds but I may be mistaken on that it's not my expertise. 1549 02:22:55,810 --> 02:23:01,790 So, part of this came about because of the money that came from A-24, and I know a lot 1550 02:23:01,790 --> 02:23:06,790 of it was in kind, not as much necessarily cash, but it's what sparked the kind of 1551 02:23:06,790 --> 02:23:08,050 controversy and question, bless you. 1552 02:23:09,870 --> 02:23:18,150 So if there was residual money from that campaign, can that be used and also unions and things 1553 02:23:18,150 --> 02:23:23,370 things like that, how does that, where do they play into what they can donate to individual 1554 02:23:23,370 --> 02:23:24,530 candidate campaigns? 1555 02:23:25,170 --> 02:23:30,930 I think so there are established regulations regarding how you can roll, you know, funds 1556 02:23:30,930 --> 02:23:35,410 from one candidate committee to another, say, candidate controlled ballot measure committee 1557 02:23:35,410 --> 02:23:41,850 that provide clear guidelines on how to do it, regarding, say, an independent expenditure or 1558 02:23:41,850 --> 02:23:48,010 a ballot measure committee unaffiliated with a candidate in order, I think generally speaking 1559 02:23:48,010 --> 02:23:52,230 they would not be able to roll over the funds unless they could somehow comply with the requirements 1560 02:23:52,730 --> 02:23:56,490 to contribute to a candidate's campaign committee. 1561 02:23:56,970 --> 02:24:04,210 So you'd have to disclose everyone who contributed, so I think it's probably not practical, whether 1562 02:24:04,210 --> 02:24:09,030 there are scenarios that experts in campaign finance law can come up with maybe, but generally 1563 02:24:09,030 --> 02:24:13,350 speaking, if you're going to contribute to a candidate-controlled committee, the campaign 1564 02:24:13,350 --> 02:24:16,290 contribution limits apply and the disclosure rules apply. 1565 02:24:16,290 --> 02:24:19,110 And so that you need to comply with those. 1566 02:24:20,290 --> 02:24:26,070 So how does that work then if the union wants to give you $1,000 or $5,000 or something? 1567 02:24:26,270 --> 02:24:30,950 You're not allowed, when she said these campaign limits in place, then that wouldn't be allowed for individual candidates. 1568 02:24:32,150 --> 02:24:36,610 If you establish, so under the state default, if we don't establish local limits. 1569 02:24:37,590 --> 02:24:37,890 Right. 1570 02:24:38,950 --> 02:24:43,310 Contributors could provide contributions and aggregate under that amount. 1571 02:24:43,310 --> 02:24:46,830 And they just would have to identify who made the contribution. 1572 02:24:47,190 --> 02:24:51,170 There's low thresholds for anonymous donations, but above that diminimous level, 1573 02:24:51,690 --> 02:24:53,390 you have to identify who your contributors are. 1574 02:24:55,690 --> 02:25:01,870 And if you establish the local, lower local limit, I think generally speaking, under first amendment, 1575 02:25:02,050 --> 02:25:04,370 everyone has to be subject to the same rules. 1576 02:25:05,090 --> 02:25:09,970 We can't discriminate, that might be a strong word, but we can't discriminate based on viewpoint, 1577 02:25:09,970 --> 02:25:16,130 point, protect a classification, things like that or political activities like a union. 1578 02:25:16,670 --> 02:25:21,690 So generally speaking, we want the rules to be one size fits all and everybody has to 1579 02:25:21,690 --> 02:25:22,330 comply with those. 1580 02:25:23,030 --> 02:25:23,290 Thank you. 1581 02:25:23,430 --> 02:25:25,770 And I was just using those as an example. 1582 02:25:26,050 --> 02:25:30,070 So my name and friends don't, I'm just asking questions to my left. 1583 02:25:32,190 --> 02:25:39,570 Just for amplification purposes, it is unfortunate because this started as a result of the 1584 02:25:39,570 --> 02:25:44,350 the PAC contributions to A24, but just so that everyone's 100% clear. 1585 02:25:45,270 --> 02:25:51,170 The way the law is set up, we don't have the ability to restrict the amount of dark 1586 02:25:51,170 --> 02:25:56,030 money or PAC money that comes into local initiatives on the ballot. 1587 02:25:56,850 --> 02:25:57,530 That's correct. 1588 02:25:57,830 --> 02:26:00,870 That's the current state of Supreme Court precedent. 1589 02:26:01,110 --> 02:26:01,710 Okay, thank you. 1590 02:26:02,070 --> 02:26:04,870 And then I say a question, and I'm pretty sure I read this in your report. 1591 02:26:04,870 --> 02:26:12,670 where the campaign limit lets presume we come up with a $500 limit. 1592 02:26:13,010 --> 02:26:18,470 The individual, the candidate, is unlimited in the amount that they can loan their campaign 1593 02:26:19,150 --> 02:26:22,030 and then they can repay that, of course, at a later day. 1594 02:26:22,050 --> 02:26:26,970 They can make their contributions, personal contributions are unlimited. 1595 02:26:27,570 --> 02:26:31,830 There are limits on loans, which I believe is currently $100,000. 1596 02:26:33,770 --> 02:26:39,430 And that's also generally speaking, at least the fact we can't prohibit personal contributions 1597 02:26:39,430 --> 02:26:42,430 to your own campaign is based on Supreme Court precedent. 1598 02:26:43,010 --> 02:26:43,310 Gotcha. 1599 02:26:43,570 --> 02:26:50,070 So unlimited personal contributions to your own campaign and then sounds like a rather 1600 02:26:50,070 --> 02:26:52,290 large amount that you can loan to your campaign. 1601 02:26:53,010 --> 02:26:59,110 I guess the significant factor there is the lending, candidates lending, sorry, it's getting 1602 02:26:59,110 --> 02:26:59,670 late. 1603 02:26:59,670 --> 02:27:06,450 The amount that a candidate can lend him or herself is not limited to the 500, but it's limited by some other 1604 02:27:07,190 --> 02:27:07,870 arbitrary number. 1605 02:27:08,550 --> 02:27:10,470 It would be limited under state law. 1606 02:27:11,010 --> 02:27:13,050 Yeah, that could be a component 1607 02:27:13,830 --> 02:27:15,550 potentially of a local campaign 1608 02:27:15,550 --> 02:27:19,810 contribution limit would also be to reduce the personal loan limit. 1609 02:27:19,970 --> 02:27:21,810 Again, we'd have to base it on 1610 02:27:22,470 --> 02:27:24,590 findings and analysis that there is 1611 02:27:25,030 --> 02:27:26,670 some public interest we're trying to 1612 02:27:26,670 --> 02:27:34,590 to serve and avoid, you know, corruption, appearance of corruption type issues, I believe 1613 02:27:34,590 --> 02:27:38,010 some local jurisdictions have gone into the personal loan issue. 1614 02:27:38,610 --> 02:27:39,210 Thank you. 1615 02:27:43,090 --> 02:27:49,210 I did reach out to Mr. Stack with regard to this because I had some questions that I just 1616 02:27:49,210 --> 02:27:50,290 want to clarify on. 1617 02:27:51,290 --> 02:27:58,050 In terms of, is it true that in terms of some independent group wanting to, I don't 1618 02:27:58,050 --> 02:28:05,970 know, run three paid advertisements for a candidate. Can they do that? If it's unaffiliated 1619 02:28:05,970 --> 02:28:13,310 with a candidate, they can do that. Yep. And that's why you'll see, you know, there's 1620 02:28:13,310 --> 02:28:18,470 always the disclaimer at the bottom of the ads. The Democratic, yeah, I got you. Put your 1621 02:28:18,470 --> 02:28:24,010 name on there. So, so in other words, I guess I'm saying we're kind of limited to how much 1622 02:28:24,010 --> 02:28:27,570 We can't really do here, right? 1623 02:28:28,250 --> 02:28:31,410 It really is limited to candidate control committees. 1624 02:28:31,670 --> 02:28:31,790 Yeah. 1625 02:28:33,490 --> 02:28:33,530 Okay. 1626 02:28:33,610 --> 02:28:40,510 And the one, so I think you can modify or impose limitations regarding that category with 1627 02:28:40,510 --> 02:28:46,090 the one exception that we can't impose limits on personal contributions to your own campaign. 1628 02:28:51,770 --> 02:28:53,510 Public comment is open on the side. 1629 02:28:55,450 --> 02:28:56,990 Here are there any raised hands in the queue? 1630 02:28:56,990 --> 02:28:58,030 There 1631 02:29:00,430 --> 02:29:01,590 are no raised hands in the queue. 1632 02:29:02,730 --> 02:29:08,150 That I will bring it back to Council closed public comment and questions move into the. 1633 02:29:12,170 --> 02:29:18,950 The comment that I have here is I'm not exactly sure what we're task to do tonight but I'm 1634 02:29:18,950 --> 02:29:23,250 not in favor of limiting individual contributions for candidates. 1635 02:29:23,810 --> 02:29:29,530 If you limited it to $500 or whatever then that would mean that if the individual is running 1636 02:29:29,530 --> 02:29:36,870 And I'll speak for myself, that would have to loan the campaign a lot more money. 1637 02:29:37,830 --> 02:29:44,130 So my position here is that it'd be easier for me to, because it takes, I think, 1638 02:29:44,330 --> 02:29:49,970 probably, and I'm just throwing this number out, $15,000 to $20,000 to run a campaign, 1639 02:29:50,230 --> 02:29:51,730 or at least that's what it costs me. 1640 02:29:52,430 --> 02:29:59,450 I'm probably not as smart as you folks, but my point being is that I'm not 1641 02:29:59,450 --> 02:29:59,970 in favor of. 1642 02:30:00,000 --> 02:30:01,800 Individual campaign, contributions. 1643 02:30:05,660 --> 02:30:16,200 Well, I would beg to differ with you, Mr. LaFaye. You didn't even run against anybody. I don't know why you spent that money. 1644 02:30:19,160 --> 02:30:32,840 I don't know. I, I like the idea of the less reporting. Yeah, the less reporting, you know, sounds easier. I don't know. I ran 1645 02:30:32,840 --> 02:30:34,940 And I think I raised like $3,000. 1646 02:30:35,680 --> 02:30:40,400 I mean, I didn't try to raise money, but I had $3,000 donated to me. 1647 02:30:40,740 --> 02:30:41,980 And I don't know. 1648 02:30:42,140 --> 02:30:45,260 I think it's, I'm not a good person to ask, I guess. 1649 02:30:45,800 --> 02:30:51,660 I was really interested in this as if it would, you know, apply to something like a 1650 02:30:51,660 --> 02:30:59,760 valid measure or, you know, dark money kind of funding, but it's unfortunate that it doesn't. 1651 02:31:00,860 --> 02:31:04,240 I'm interested in limiting a contribution that could be made. 1652 02:31:04,420 --> 02:31:09,320 I think that it helps in a small community like ours, as I've seen through past elections 1653 02:31:09,320 --> 02:31:16,720 when Mayor Peters was serving and marries and others, where they were able to have unlimited 1654 02:31:16,720 --> 02:31:27,160 funding and it doesn't allow for an even playing field as far as, you know, just campaigning 1655 02:31:27,160 --> 02:31:32,320 in a small community. It just feels like things can be bought. And that's the appearance, 1656 02:31:32,560 --> 02:31:37,100 whether they are or aren't. I'm not here to debate, but that's the impression that it gives 1657 02:31:37,100 --> 02:31:43,480 me. And so if there's an opportunity for us to, you know, limit when you look at the donations 1658 02:31:43,480 --> 02:31:49,080 that were made from people, you know, we're a town of 10,000 people and you know, somebody 1659 02:31:49,080 --> 02:31:55,020 gave $5,000 basically in 2022 and 2024. And I'm not talking about personal contributions 1660 02:31:55,020 --> 02:31:58,320 are personal loans, but loans or donations that were made. 1661 02:31:58,600 --> 02:32:03,040 And as council member Landerm alluded to, that's more than she raised for 1662 02:32:03,040 --> 02:32:06,320 her whole campaign, and yet she walked and knocked in M1. 1663 02:32:06,660 --> 02:32:11,540 So I just want to make sure that anybody in the community has that equal opportunity 1664 02:32:11,540 --> 02:32:15,320 without having to raise that magnitude of money. 1665 02:32:15,540 --> 02:32:20,940 And so I would be supportive of the, you're just going to work towards getting more 1666 02:32:20,940 --> 02:32:26,440 donations at a smaller amount for your support rather than somebody just giving you five or $10,000. 1667 02:32:27,020 --> 02:32:29,880 That doesn't even have to be from our community, necessarily. 1668 02:32:31,480 --> 02:32:32,600 Pass it to my left. 1669 02:32:33,280 --> 02:32:33,760 Thank you. 1670 02:32:34,300 --> 02:32:37,700 Yeah, I would beg to differ from a comment that I heard earlier. 1671 02:32:38,240 --> 02:32:40,040 Council Member Lafay did run against somebody. 1672 02:32:40,220 --> 02:32:43,020 It was me and it was a very heated contest. 1673 02:32:45,910 --> 02:32:58,170 And I seriously, that I didn't quite understand Council Member Lafay, you're coming about the loans because you can loan yourself what you need to and then recoup or of course contribute unlimited to your own campaign. 1674 02:32:59,010 --> 02:33:04,230 I agree with the mayor's comments that she just mentioned. 1675 02:33:04,890 --> 02:33:08,650 I think it's a small community. We have a little over 8,000 registered voters here. 1676 02:33:09,170 --> 02:33:20,330 I think $500 just to me sounds like a reasonable amount, that way there's no undue influence by a small group of residents. 1677 02:33:21,150 --> 02:33:23,090 And it does kind of level the plane field. 1678 02:33:23,330 --> 02:33:30,410 I just think, and we saw, frankly, some of the division that occurred in the community with A24, 1679 02:33:30,630 --> 02:33:36,010 with the large amounts of money, unprecedented amounts of money that came in for a citizens initiative. 1680 02:33:36,010 --> 02:33:43,030 If I know that's a different item, but the similarities exist just in terms of how much money 1681 02:33:43,030 --> 02:33:44,730 is being spent on a particular race. 1682 02:33:45,470 --> 02:33:53,270 So I would be in favor of a $500 limit for, what is it, candidate-controlled committees? 1683 02:33:54,630 --> 02:33:55,730 Pro-10 comments? 1684 02:33:57,790 --> 02:34:04,670 Would you think $4.99 would be better because then you wouldn't have to have the, you would 1685 02:34:04,670 --> 02:34:07,550 Would you avoid the mandatory disclosure and recusal requirements? 1686 02:34:08,770 --> 02:34:13,650 Brian Stacc here, I think it's over 500 is the trigger. 1687 02:34:13,890 --> 02:34:34,230 So so long as it's 500 below is my understanding because I'm almost certain that's how it is because the jurisdictions before the limit when this first came up a few years ago, the state established at 250 and then they raised it to 500 recently and all the jurisdictions that I've seen, it's even numbers, it's 250, it's 500. 1688 02:34:34,230 --> 02:34:37,970 so I'm almost positive the law says above that number. 1689 02:34:38,830 --> 02:34:40,230 Yeah, and I think if that changed, 1690 02:34:40,610 --> 02:34:43,770 it's up to the candidate advising his or her donors. 1691 02:34:44,070 --> 02:34:46,230 It's why we see a lot of $99 checks 1692 02:34:46,230 --> 02:34:49,450 so that people don't have to disclose their personal information. 1693 02:34:51,030 --> 02:34:54,030 Mr. Stack, are you asking for a motion tonight or direction? 1694 02:34:54,910 --> 02:34:57,710 I think direction on if you want us to proceed, 1695 02:34:57,930 --> 02:35:00,270 generally speaking, preparing and processing 1696 02:35:00,270 --> 02:35:06,130 a draft ordinance and then what the potential contours of that ordinance you're thinking at this 1697 02:35:06,130 --> 02:35:13,910 time you'd like to see. So I've heard $500 as potentially the target if so kind of confirmation 1698 02:35:13,910 --> 02:35:20,270 on the range to consider and analyze and then also the enforcement issue. So once we even hose our 1699 02:35:20,270 --> 02:35:30,110 own local limit the FPPC won't enforce that absentee contract with them. And I know they have that 1700 02:35:30,110 --> 02:35:31,570 a contract form on their website. 1701 02:35:31,850 --> 02:35:33,010 I don't know how many local jurisdictions 1702 02:35:33,010 --> 02:35:35,670 are actually contracting with FPPC to do it 1703 02:35:36,180 --> 02:35:38,910 and how effective that's been or cost prohibitive. 1704 02:35:39,590 --> 02:35:42,550 You know, so it's both the amount of the limit 1705 02:35:42,550 --> 02:35:46,950 and then also tentative direction on enforcement 1706 02:35:47,480 --> 02:35:49,530 and whether we, you know, to use the state 1707 02:35:49,530 --> 02:35:50,990 but pay for them to do it. 1708 02:35:51,350 --> 02:35:53,470 And it's, I think, primarily complaint driven, 1709 02:35:53,670 --> 02:35:56,830 we send a complaint to the FPPC and they process it. 1710 02:35:57,410 --> 02:36:05,390 or you can, you can stand up a more local enforcement measure where it's, you know, say the city attorney could, could file a civil action. 1711 02:36:07,450 --> 02:36:09,290 Your stickions have handled a variety of ways. 1712 02:36:09,750 --> 02:36:18,070 Could you, can, if we move forward with this, with direction to do that, can you bring back some recommendations of what those options would be with that. 1713 02:36:18,590 --> 02:36:20,830 So we wouldn't know what it would look like. 1714 02:36:20,830 --> 02:36:34,670 I guess also want direction whether you want any more another agenda item before a first reading, or would you, are you comfortable with staff coming back with? 1715 02:36:34,890 --> 02:36:39,790 Let's start with if there's council support to look at a $500 campaign limit. 1716 02:36:42,250 --> 02:36:50,470 I just want to ask one thing, Mr. Stack, because I don't know, my understanding was that 1717 02:36:50,470 --> 02:36:53,030 then the obligation would fall onto the city. 1718 02:36:53,990 --> 02:36:54,550 So is that? 1719 02:36:55,990 --> 02:37:02,840 If that's correct, yeah, the FPPC would no longer automatically enforce free of charge to the 1720 02:37:04,900 --> 02:37:10,220 And so we either would need to stand up a local enforcement measure or we, and I think 1721 02:37:10,220 --> 02:37:13,960 we could do it a variety of ways where we also empower ourselves locally to do enforcement. 1722 02:37:14,420 --> 02:37:20,980 But we also can enter into a contract with the FPPC and that way as situations come 1723 02:37:20,980 --> 02:37:25,340 up we can decide which enforcement remedy or tool we want to use. 1724 02:37:28,060 --> 02:37:28,800 Thank you. 1725 02:37:29,720 --> 02:37:36,300 I would just presume that enforcement would be sort of self-regulating by the other candidate 1726 02:37:36,300 --> 02:37:37,120 in the race. 1727 02:37:37,860 --> 02:37:44,720 So yeah, I would hope, but yeah, if it sounds like we have support for the $500 limit 1728 02:37:44,720 --> 02:37:50,200 and do we want to look at what those options would be as far as how we would enforce it locally 1729 02:37:50,200 --> 02:37:55,600 versus, you know, in what it would look like contractually, I think, without going too far 1730 02:37:55,600 --> 02:37:55,940 down that. 1731 02:37:55,940 --> 02:38:00,860 And then do we want it to come back before first reading for the $500 limit? 1732 02:38:04,810 --> 02:38:06,470 I'm okay with it. 1733 02:38:08,810 --> 02:38:14,370 I mean, I'm inclined to have it come back, but if you think if you think you have everything you need at this point. 1734 02:38:14,990 --> 02:38:19,990 You know, I just want to be mindful and respectful of the council's time and sometimes it's helpful to come back and sometimes. 1735 02:38:20,970 --> 02:38:22,190 You know, it's not necessary. 1736 02:38:22,190 --> 02:38:26,410 I think it's, there's, you know, maybe three questions that will be the big 1737 02:38:26,410 --> 02:38:31,150 substantive ones and I think we could do it on a first reading and a public hearing 1738 02:38:31,750 --> 02:38:35,730 and you can make tweaks and then we re, you know, reintroduce at that meeting and 1739 02:38:35,730 --> 02:38:38,370 then we do the second hearing, the second meeting later, yeah. 1740 02:38:38,790 --> 02:38:41,750 One, two, three, four, good. 1741 02:38:42,510 --> 02:38:42,750 Okay. 1742 02:38:43,170 --> 02:38:43,430 Question? 1743 02:38:45,480 --> 02:38:49,740 Appreciate that and thank you, Ms. Swan, on that too, and all the other items. 1744 02:38:49,920 --> 02:38:50,240 Thank you. 1745 02:38:50,800 --> 02:38:52,660 The advisory boards and all those things. 1746 02:38:52,660 --> 02:38:53,180 Thank you. 1747 02:38:53,180 --> 02:38:58,000 Thank you to our finance director for her work on that with CFAC also appreciate that 1748 02:38:59,140 --> 02:39:03,420 Well, thank you for the phenomenal report tonight future agenda items 1749 02:39:04,140 --> 02:39:09,480 I have some if nobody else does I can see future agenda items 1750 02:39:10,540 --> 02:39:11,560 Working on something 1751 02:39:13,620 --> 02:39:14,420 Okay 1752 02:39:15,840 --> 02:39:20,080 So um where shall I start um it's late 1753 02:39:20,080 --> 02:39:21,420 It's been a 1754 02:39:21,420 --> 02:39:25,340 But I'll preface this all by saying I haven't had any for a long time. 1755 02:39:26,380 --> 02:39:31,720 One is I think it would be a nice thing to include on the agenda. 1756 02:39:32,500 --> 02:39:38,420 I notice that HAB does this and they have the future agenda items that they have that 1757 02:39:38,420 --> 02:39:39,960 is included on their agenda. 1758 02:39:40,260 --> 02:39:50,000 And it's just a really nice, a good way to keep track for the public of what has been talked 1759 02:39:50,000 --> 02:39:54,560 about and I think that would be nice if I had if I could get support for for 1760 02:39:54,560 --> 02:40:01,240 that. I don't think it's a future agenda let's just do it. I don't I think maybe 1761 02:40:01,240 --> 02:40:06,520 you could meet with the city manager and the city clerking get some. I'm not 1762 02:40:06,520 --> 02:40:10,620 have you seen the Habs agenda they have all their future agenda items like the 1763 02:40:10,620 --> 02:40:15,420 track of them in in the agenda each agenda. They're just an advisory board 1764 02:40:15,420 --> 02:40:19,720 not a policy making and we have, there's our self-generated. 1765 02:40:20,180 --> 02:40:27,120 Well, so where are, I just think it's a good idea because they can kind of get in my 1766 02:40:27,120 --> 02:40:33,840 mind, they kind of get buried and a new council member might not know what has already been 1767 02:40:33,840 --> 02:40:35,540 discussed and what is upcoming. 1768 02:40:36,000 --> 02:40:40,720 Well, that information, just checking with the city clerk, that information's provided to 1769 02:40:40,720 --> 02:40:42,920 Councils still are planning track? 1770 02:40:44,160 --> 02:40:45,420 Well, it's not provided. 1771 02:40:45,720 --> 02:40:47,480 I mean, if you ask for it, maybe you would get it, 1772 02:40:47,480 --> 02:40:48,800 but I don't get it. 1773 02:40:49,000 --> 02:40:50,360 And does anyone else get it? 1774 02:40:50,640 --> 02:40:51,120 Yeah, I get it. 1775 02:40:51,720 --> 02:40:53,620 No, no, no, not the tentative ones. 1776 02:40:54,000 --> 02:40:55,400 The future agenda items. 1777 02:40:55,400 --> 02:40:59,560 Like, for instance, the short-term rental, 1778 02:40:59,920 --> 02:41:02,640 like, you know, it took a while for us to get to this one. 1779 02:41:03,380 --> 02:41:04,620 We can just request that. 1780 02:41:05,800 --> 02:41:08,320 And, well, I know, but why wouldn't we want to just put it? 1781 02:41:08,320 --> 02:41:14,020 because it changes constantly and it changes things drop off as new kind I mean wouldn't it be nice 1782 02:41:14,020 --> 02:41:21,140 to keep track of that? I know that they do but I would like to know where we are and I think maybe the 1783 02:41:21,140 --> 02:41:26,700 public might you know they hear this stuff and it seems like it might be a good idea to include that 1784 02:41:28,200 --> 02:41:32,920 interested in us in the time months ago that we 1785 02:41:32,920 --> 02:41:38,920 and staff's priorities, and the priorities that the council gives, it could be missing 1786 02:41:38,920 --> 02:41:46,850 to the staff, but they were less important, and I don't want that staff's not addressing 1787 02:41:46,850 --> 02:41:48,890 something, or I don't want to get into a big debate. 1788 02:41:49,370 --> 02:41:50,030 Right, yeah. 1789 02:41:50,330 --> 02:41:54,870 The limited discussion, but there are a variety of, I mean, the city manager could report out 1790 02:41:54,870 --> 02:41:56,950 of future council, you know, item. 1791 02:41:57,790 --> 02:42:02,070 I mean, I myself have made future agenda items that I don't even know, I don't even remember 1792 02:42:02,070 --> 02:42:02,590 what they were. 1793 02:42:02,590 --> 02:42:07,730 So, I might say the same thing again, so it's just a good idea. 1794 02:42:08,030 --> 02:42:12,950 I might have thought I said something and I didn't, you know, can we circle back to it maybe at the next one? 1795 02:42:14,330 --> 02:42:16,690 Yeah, so no one wants to put that on there? 1796 02:42:16,770 --> 02:42:26,470 Well, I support it and maybe the nuance is the future agenda item is a means of tracking future agenda items. 1797 02:42:27,670 --> 02:42:29,290 Mayor, may I put in? 1798 02:42:29,290 --> 02:42:32,230 So we have a couple of Excel documents that we use. 1799 02:42:32,310 --> 02:42:33,970 We have the tentative agenda, which we send out. 1800 02:42:34,070 --> 02:42:35,090 Well, you'll be getting it tomorrow. 1801 02:42:35,710 --> 02:42:38,490 And then on a separate Excel spreadsheet 1802 02:42:38,490 --> 02:42:41,230 is the future agenda items mostly declared 1803 02:42:41,230 --> 02:42:42,370 at the end of your meetings. 1804 02:42:42,650 --> 02:42:44,710 So what I would suggest for the beginning 1805 02:42:44,710 --> 02:42:48,730 and that has been given out, I'll just say infrequently, 1806 02:42:48,910 --> 02:42:50,950 not on a regular basis like the tentative agenda, 1807 02:42:51,070 --> 02:42:55,550 but perhaps we could attach that to a tentative agenda 1808 02:42:55,550 --> 02:42:58,810 on like a monthly or a couple times a monthly basis 1809 02:42:58,810 --> 02:43:01,750 So you can see basically it's the item when it was brought up, 1810 02:43:01,750 --> 02:43:03,790 who brought it up, so that information, 1811 02:43:03,970 --> 02:43:06,270 so you can be confident that it's, we are tracking it, 1812 02:43:06,330 --> 02:43:09,230 but I understand what Council Member Landrum is saying. 1813 02:43:09,370 --> 02:43:11,030 So maybe we attach it and send it to you, 1814 02:43:11,190 --> 02:43:12,790 so at least you have it, it's, you know, 1815 02:43:12,870 --> 02:43:16,250 it's not a private document, certainly that way you will know 1816 02:43:16,250 --> 02:43:19,270 that we're keeping track, or we missed something. 1817 02:43:20,370 --> 02:43:21,690 Thank you, that would be great. 1818 02:43:22,050 --> 02:43:24,770 So it doesn't need to be an official conversation. 1819 02:43:24,990 --> 02:43:25,950 Okay, great. 1820 02:43:25,950 --> 02:43:41,190 then I'll move on so this is kind of involved and it stems from just thinking about, you know, 1821 02:43:41,250 --> 02:43:52,450 all of these things. We have, as far as our goal of economic vitality, so it started out, I was 1822 02:43:52,450 --> 02:43:57,210 I was interested in a, like, how can you get vacant buildings? 1823 02:43:57,810 --> 02:44:03,550 How can you encourage vacant commercial properties to not be vacant anymore to get them, 1824 02:44:03,890 --> 02:44:06,450 to put businesses in them and things like that? 1825 02:44:06,630 --> 02:44:13,530 And I talked to the chair of the CFAC, Steve PAC, and 1826 02:44:13,530 --> 02:44:18,490 he was telling me about a vacant CTACs and in commercial property, so I looked into that. 1827 02:44:19,290 --> 02:44:28,050 I am, you know, really conscientious of property rights, but then again, there are, you know, 1828 02:44:28,430 --> 02:44:33,270 they can properties in Moral Bay, like both entrances to Moral Bay. 1829 02:44:34,230 --> 02:44:36,590 Can you tell us what you just want and what you're asking for? 1830 02:44:36,590 --> 02:44:39,010 Well, because we're not supposed to be made the, I know. 1831 02:44:39,330 --> 02:44:40,790 It's looking at the city attorney there. 1832 02:44:41,210 --> 02:44:46,370 It's kind of, it is kind of convoluted because I'm just going to combine all of these different ones. 1833 02:44:46,370 --> 02:44:52,190 commercial. So that that's a I guess it's just this whole broad picture of is 1834 02:44:52,190 --> 02:44:56,790 that there is that a something that we want to talk about is it um well they're 1835 02:44:56,790 --> 02:44:58,410 bringing the council member land from 1836 02:45:00,000 --> 02:45:29,920 I'm sorry, I'm just wondering maybe this is stuff that could be discussed at the joint meeting. Is it possible that? Yeah, I'm wondering because it sounds like it might be. Kind of, but then it is a revenue opportunity. They are definitely revenue opportunities, but it's how to how to create policies to to get to those. You know, and then and then when I looked into 1837 02:45:29,920 --> 02:45:33,020 to the vacancy tax, you can also do that. 1838 02:45:33,640 --> 02:45:36,900 Well, I don't think you can do it on industrial property, 1839 02:45:37,280 --> 02:45:40,500 vacant industrial property, but now that the visitor property 1840 02:45:40,500 --> 02:45:41,140 is- 1841 02:45:41,140 --> 02:45:42,040 Council member, I don't know. 1842 02:45:42,300 --> 02:45:43,360 Zoned, yes? 1843 02:45:43,480 --> 02:45:43,960 Having discussion. 1844 02:45:45,400 --> 02:45:46,820 I'm not discussing anything. 1845 02:45:47,260 --> 02:45:49,480 Yeah, but do you just need to ask what the item is you want? 1846 02:45:51,160 --> 02:45:52,360 Okay, a conversation. 1847 02:45:52,660 --> 02:45:53,600 Then I'll go one by one. 1848 02:45:53,720 --> 02:45:56,140 I was gonna try to condense them, but I won't. 1849 02:45:56,140 --> 02:46:00,400 Economic development coming up, so are these things that fit under the economic development agenda? 1850 02:46:02,580 --> 02:46:06,520 What do you mean we have economic development on our agenda? 1851 02:46:09,040 --> 02:46:11,780 What they can see, commercial they can see. 1852 02:46:12,220 --> 02:46:17,740 Well, I also, okay, then I would like to look at what we can do with the Vistra property. 1853 02:46:18,540 --> 02:46:23,540 As far as its zoned commercial, visitor-serving commercial. 1854 02:46:23,540 --> 02:46:32,340 So can we encourage the property owner to get that building? 1855 02:46:32,540 --> 02:46:34,100 It's bright in our city. 1856 02:46:34,280 --> 02:46:35,720 Can we do something about that? 1857 02:46:39,430 --> 02:46:42,610 That Claire, and I would support that. 1858 02:46:42,790 --> 02:46:43,870 Yeah, I would support that. 1859 02:46:44,590 --> 02:46:44,910 Okay. 1860 02:46:45,390 --> 02:46:45,590 And then. 1861 02:46:46,130 --> 02:46:46,930 Let's stop it. 1862 02:46:47,050 --> 02:46:48,390 Do you have clarity on what it is? 1863 02:46:48,490 --> 02:46:49,190 She's asking for. 1864 02:46:49,830 --> 02:46:50,190 Okay. 1865 02:46:50,730 --> 02:46:51,250 Okay. 1866 02:46:51,410 --> 02:46:51,650 Thank you. 1867 02:46:51,650 --> 02:47:21,530 And, you know, a lot of this kind of, if I would summarize this, this is like an economic development position, really, within the city, but okay, so then also there's at least two vacant lots on the Embarcadero, and we are talking about parking and charging for parking, and I would like to look at maybe see if we can look at a way to encourage the property owners to use those as parking, kind of as a low-hanging fruit rather than doing all these 1868 02:47:21,530 --> 02:47:25,010 drastic measures like charging at the rock and 1869 02:47:27,280 --> 02:47:31,000 I don't know if that's Mr. Stack is I don't know if 1870 02:47:31,000 --> 02:47:36,600 that's you or Mr. Singhwald or I don't know if I have the manager. 1871 02:47:40,800 --> 02:47:41,960 I'm not sure what the question 1872 02:47:41,960 --> 02:47:46,480 is. I mean I understand what the item is that they think they're the probably a couple privately 1873 02:47:46,480 --> 02:47:51,140 owned vacant lots on the Embarcadero and I believe what Councilmember Landrum's question is 1874 02:47:51,140 --> 02:47:57,880 is, are we able to use them, are they able to be used, can I say, without the permission 1875 02:47:57,880 --> 02:48:02,760 of the property owner, that's what I'm, I think, and that I don't know the answer to 1876 02:48:02,760 --> 02:48:03,220 that question. 1877 02:48:03,380 --> 02:48:06,940 I know we've tried to use them, man, I'm guessing no, I know we've tried to use them before, 1878 02:48:07,200 --> 02:48:15,380 but yeah, I feel like that's not, yeah, sorry, I'm not verbalized. 1879 02:48:15,380 --> 02:48:45,360 That's a prime stacker city attorney, this agenda item is for describing the contours of a potential future agenda item and so some of it sounds like we could take into consideration at staff level when we bring back the economic development component and so it's like if we get direction from the council that's how you want to see it and then if there's something that doesn't quite fit with the economic development does council want us to put a future agenda item on say parking related to these sites or you know, okay, this is that's 1880 02:48:45,360 --> 02:48:45,960 Thank you. 1881 02:48:46,320 --> 02:48:51,060 And then the other two are not related to that at all. 1882 02:48:51,660 --> 02:49:08,640 They are, well there is one, it is looking at a vacancy tax on residential property in light of the conversation we just had of short term rentals and what they do to the housing stock and to neighborhoods. 1883 02:49:08,640 --> 02:49:16,660 and we have to kind of face the fact that that is an issue in Moral Bay and I don't know I'm just not that I am in favor of that 1884 02:49:16,660 --> 02:49:23,020 I just am curious about what the possibilities are there and I would like to know about that I don't know if anyone else does. 1885 02:49:23,460 --> 02:49:24,960 I would support that. 1886 02:49:25,460 --> 02:49:29,000 Before you talking about, you're talking about attacks on secondary homes. 1887 02:49:29,020 --> 02:49:33,120 Yes, we're talking about other communities that have done attacks on secondary homes. 1888 02:49:34,260 --> 02:49:35,640 Or have attempted. 1889 02:49:37,600 --> 02:49:44,960 and then these two are totally unrelated. I think it would be nice to have a check-in, 1890 02:49:45,040 --> 02:49:52,420 like a recap of what's our camping ordinance and we have new council members now and I think 1891 02:49:52,420 --> 02:49:53,220 it would be nice to. 1892 02:49:53,220 --> 02:49:55,180 This is asking for an update on that, yeah. 1893 02:49:56,120 --> 02:50:03,080 And then also an update on the massage partners. 1894 02:50:07,000 --> 02:50:09,620 on the ordinance that they're working on. 1895 02:50:09,620 --> 02:50:09,760 Yes. 1896 02:50:13,500 --> 02:50:20,020 The only other thing is, if we could maybe somehow get the microphones to, if we could get an update on the microphones. 1897 02:50:21,520 --> 02:50:27,640 But what, maybe that's not a futile agenda, I'll just, thank you, with that we're adjourned. 1898 02:50:28,000 --> 02:50:28,820 We're going to go home. 1899 02:50:29,540 --> 02:50:32,200 What about, did you go to sleep last night? 1900 02:50:33,480 --> 02:50:35,420 I thought we were going to, I thought they were going to fix. 1901 02:50:35,420 --> 02:50:35,960 Yes, sir. 1902 02:50:36,040 --> 02:50:36,500 Are you guys ready?