1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:19,000 Okay, we can go ahead and get started. Good evening. Welcome to the May 7, 2026 City of Napa, 2 00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:23,800 regular meeting for the Planning Commission. I would like to call this meeting to order and ask my 3 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:29,800 request to conduct a roll call. Commissioner E-buck. Here. Commissioner Massaro. 4 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:35,800 Present. Commissioner Shotwell. Present. Vice Chair Myers. And Chair Owen. Present. 5 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:39,800 We will now rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. 6 00:00:53,800 --> 00:01:02,800 The Planning Commission conducts all meetings in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. 7 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:06,800 And pursuant to the city's rules of order for planning commission meetings. 8 00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:10,800 Staff, are there any changes to the evening's agenda or any supplemental reports? 9 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:16,800 There are no changes to the agenda, but I do want to clarify there was a legal ad publication on April 23, 10 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:24,800 for Jim Grass, 1746, you homie use permit appeal and the applicant ended up withdrawing the appeal. 11 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:33,800 Thank you. Commissioners, are there any proposed changes to this evening's agenda? 12 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:40,800 Public comment provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the planning commission on items of interest, 13 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:48,800 otherwise noted on the agenda. Each speaker's comments will be limited to three minutes and will comply with the rules of order for planning commission meetings. 14 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:55,800 Do we have any members of the public who wish to provide public comments on non agenda items? 15 00:01:55,800 --> 00:02:00,800 All right. The consent calendar. These routine items may be approved by a single vote. 16 00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:07,800 However, any member of the public or commissioner may remove an item for consideration during the public hearing portion of the agenda. 17 00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:13,800 This evening we are reviewing the planning commission regular meeting minutes for April 16th, 2026. 18 00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:19,800 Is there a motion to approve the meeting minutes for the April 16th, 2026 planning commission regular meeting? 19 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:22,800 So moved. Second, all in favor? 20 00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:23,800 Aye. 21 00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:25,800 Motion passes. 22 00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:34,800 Consent hearings. These are items that are required to be noticed as a public hearing, but the city is not aware of any interest from the members of the public to comment on the items. 23 00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:44,800 However, any members of the public or commissioners may remove an item from the consent hearing calendar, and the item will be considered during the public hearing portion of the agenda. 24 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:50,800 Tonight we have item six a Ross sign use permit at 211. 25 00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:57,800 Is there a request to make commissioner remember of the public to pull this item from the consent hearings? 26 00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:03,800 Is there a motion to approve the consent hearing as submitted? 27 00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:05,800 So moved. 28 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:06,800 Second. 29 00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:07,800 All in favor? 30 00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:08,800 Aye. 31 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:09,800 Motion passes. 32 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:21,800 Public hearings and appeals. These are items that are formally presented to the planning commission and provide an opportunity for members of the public to comment. 33 00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:26,800 Applicants or Appellants are allowed 10 minutes to present testimony at the beginning of the public hearing. 34 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:30,800 And if needed five minutes to present rebuttal at the end of the public hearing. 35 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:34,800 All other speakers will be limited to three minutes. 36 00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:42,800 Tonight we have the following item item seven a eight zero eight capital a drive tentative map. 37 00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:47,800 Can we start with commissioner disclosures? 38 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:48,800 Aye. 39 00:03:48,800 --> 00:03:53,800 I drove by the site and a cabinet and email exchange with staff. 40 00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:55,800 I have no disclosures. 41 00:03:56,800 --> 00:03:59,800 I'm familiar with the site and I met with staff. 42 00:03:59,800 --> 00:04:01,800 I have a property right next door. 43 00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:03,800 So I will be leaving the meeting now. 44 00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:07,800 Okay. Thanks for joining us for the first portion. 45 00:04:07,800 --> 00:04:10,800 I visited the site and spoke with staff. 46 00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:11,800 Thank you. 47 00:04:11,800 --> 00:04:14,800 And we will now hear a report from staff. 48 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:16,800 Good evening everybody. 49 00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:19,800 I'll be proposing on the proposed tentative subdivision map. 50 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:29,800 We have Jeremy Sill and Chris Russell to answer any questions. 51 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:35,800 The applicant proposes a tentative subdivision map design review permit and use permit to subdivide and approximately. 52 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:44,800 1.46 acre parcel into eight single family lots and construct eight new single family homes with associated improvements. 53 00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:52,800 The project site is located on the east side of capital a drive south of capital a court. 54 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:54,800 The project site is mostly vacant. 55 00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:56,800 There's a couple trees. 56 00:04:56,800 --> 00:05:03,800 None of the trees meet the criteria to be considered protective native trees under the codes definition. 57 00:05:03,800 --> 00:05:09,800 There's an existing single family home and filled in pool that would be removed with the project. 58 00:05:09,800 --> 00:05:13,800 The project is project site is moderately sloped. 59 00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:19,800 Limited grading is proposed to accompany the new homes. 60 00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:25,800 Currently, the property furniture is undeveloped with curb, gutter or sidewalk. 61 00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:35,800 In addition, the property currently separates the northern and southern extensions of capital a drive, which would be extended with the project. 62 00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:41,800 The applicant requests to divide the property into eight new single family lots. 63 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:49,800 In addition, the proposed one new shared parcel to host the project required by a retention facilities. 64 00:05:49,800 --> 00:06:01,800 In addition, they proposed to construct eight new single family homes, including related improvements, like retaining walls, including walls over three feet and height, which do require design review approval and a new private street. 65 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:09,800 In addition, they proposed public improvements like the connection of capital a drive and new curb gutter and sidewalk. 66 00:06:09,800 --> 00:06:18,800 Just relisting the required entitlements with a project, a tentative subdivision map to divide the property into eight parcels and one shared parcel. 67 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:25,800 Design review permit for the subdivision layout for the design of the new single family homes and for the retaining walls. 68 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:33,800 And a use permit to allow two flag lots and for the application of small land development standards. 69 00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:36,800 This is the proposed site plan. 70 00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:40,800 Six of the units would be accessed by a new private street. 71 00:06:40,800 --> 00:06:44,800 Lots for in six are the proposed flag lots. 72 00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:53,800 At the west end of the site, you can see the new public extension of capital a drive. 73 00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:57,800 Next, I'll be going through the proposed front elevations of each home. 74 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:01,800 Each home proposed in a project is unique. 75 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:05,800 Having their own architectural design. 76 00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:09,800 Each home incorporates unique features. 77 00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:12,800 Consistent with high level design. 78 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:15,800 Recommended by our design guidelines. 79 00:07:24,800 --> 00:07:31,800 The proposed units would be between 3,108 square feet and 3,820 square feet. 80 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:36,800 They would contain three to four bedrooms and be two to two and a half stories. 81 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:47,800 Like I stated earlier, there would be a mix of architectural styles as each home is uniquely designed and there's a high level of architectural detail provided in each home. 82 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:50,800 The retaining walls are mostly located at the perimeter of the site. 83 00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:53,800 Most sections of wall are between one and three feet and eight. 84 00:07:53,800 --> 00:07:56,800 There's limited sections above three feet. 85 00:07:56,800 --> 00:08:04,800 Staff has required that any wall that's visible from the political right of way be clad and a decorative material to match the adjacent home. 86 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:09,800 Like Sacco or another siding material. 87 00:08:09,800 --> 00:08:15,800 The applicant proposes parking that would exceed the requirements for single family homes. 88 00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:19,800 For more parking spaces would be provided on each parcel. 89 00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:27,800 In addition, guest parking would be provided both along the new private street and along capital a drive. 90 00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:31,800 The capital a drive extension would be constructed. 91 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:33,800 Consistent with city standards. 92 00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:42,800 A full 60 foot right of way was separated sidewalks and parking on the side of each travel lane. 93 00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:48,800 This linkage is important for the neighborhood broadly as it allows connections to terrorist drive. 94 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:54,800 The road trail in comesville road beyond. 95 00:08:54,800 --> 00:08:57,800 Moving in to staff's analysis of the project. 96 00:08:57,800 --> 00:09:10,800 Staff has determined that the project would be exempt from sequa pursuant to section 15332 of the sequa guidelines a class 32 exemption, which exempts projects characterized as infill development. 97 00:09:10,800 --> 00:09:13,800 In support of this exemption. 98 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:20,800 We have prepared environmental memorandum included as attachment 10 of this staff report. 99 00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:25,800 In order to approve the project, the commission would need to make the findings for a tentative map. 100 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:29,800 A design review permit and a use permit. 101 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:35,800 In addition to the findings required under the interim zoning ordinance. 102 00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:38,800 With that staff recommends that the commission. 103 00:09:38,800 --> 00:09:42,800 If the proposed tentative subdivision map use permit and design review permit. 104 00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:46,800 And find the project is exempt from sequa. Thank you. 105 00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:48,800 Thank you. 106 00:09:58,800 --> 00:10:02,800 Okay. Are there any questions for staff? 107 00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:04,800 Do you have any questions? 108 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:11,800 Probably got a late correspondence the other day from a concerned neighbor regarding the environmental impact. 109 00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:16,800 Can you speak to that a little bit as to why this falls within the sequa exemption? 110 00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:23,800 Yes. So we review this project with the city's transportation planner and the project. 111 00:10:23,800 --> 00:10:32,800 Sorted out both based on its location and being below the VMT thresholds that apply in Napa. 112 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:39,800 But also, screens out when you combine both this parcel with the neighboring projects to the north. 113 00:10:39,800 --> 00:10:44,800 Regardless. 114 00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:54,800 I think furthermore, there's an attachment 10 that we go into detail of how the project doesn't raise any significant impacts. 115 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:57,800 And meet the criteria of a class 32 exemption. 116 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:04,800 And how it doesn't meet any of the exceptions to for the categorical exemption. 117 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:10,800 Okay. In case there were watching I just wanted that person to have some assurance. 118 00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:12,800 Thank you. 119 00:11:12,800 --> 00:11:15,800 Will we be applicant be providing a presentation? 120 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:21,800 Yes. Not a presentation, but I'm a short discussion. 121 00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:23,800 Okay. 122 00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:34,800 I'm Chris Russell. Part of the ownership group of the capital capital. 123 00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:39,800 And I don't have much to say. Just wanted to come up and introduce myself and let you know. 124 00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:41,800 I'm here today answering any questions. 125 00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:44,800 I did just have a couple of things I wanted to mention. 126 00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:47,800 I do thank you guys for reviewing the project, the commission. 127 00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:54,800 I also wanted to extend appreciation to planning staff for all that they gave us throughout the process. 128 00:11:54,800 --> 00:12:04,800 I was very, I would say, surprised at the collaborative nature that we experienced during the process with you guys. 129 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:07,800 So it was really appreciative of that. 130 00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:15,800 Just want to point out a couple of things that you may have already seen as your viewing project that. 131 00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:17,800 I think are just weren't important to us. 132 00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:23,800 So number one, these homes compared to some of the homes in the neighborhood of the surrounding streets are a little larger. 133 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:29,800 This square footage is slightly larger than what you find in the neighboring in the neighborhood around. 134 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:33,800 And the reason for that was it's really important for us. 135 00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:45,800 And we've seen this a lot as we've built homes in of the California as a lot of the buyers are very interested in finding homes where they can settle down and stick around for a long time. 136 00:12:45,800 --> 00:12:50,800 So we're trying to design homes where our residents can age in place. 137 00:12:50,800 --> 00:12:59,800 And so when we place, when we design those homes we try to get the master suite on the ground floor and with the master suite on the ground floor naturally the footprint of the home. 138 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:01,800 It does end up larger. 139 00:13:01,800 --> 00:13:04,800 And so the square footage, you know, likewise increases. 140 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:06,800 So that was one unique thing. 141 00:13:06,800 --> 00:13:17,800 Another thing that we was important to us was that we really wanted to pay tribute to the history of Napa and particularly the architectural history of Napa. 142 00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:27,800 And I know that everybody in this room is aware of the unique architecture and especially in downtown. 143 00:13:27,800 --> 00:13:36,800 You know obviously the Victorians are beautiful homes craftsmen, arts and crafts even some story book really good representations. 144 00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:46,800 And so it was important to design homes that kind of to the extent that we could create an authentic representation of those. 145 00:13:47,800 --> 00:13:49,800 Those design elements. 146 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:53,800 And so you'll see that there are because of that. 147 00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:58,800 Our elevations, our floor plans are really unique compared to a lot of what's getting built in Napa today. 148 00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:01,800 So that's really all I have. 149 00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:04,800 Happy again answer any questions you guys have. 150 00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:06,800 But that's pretty good job. 151 00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:08,800 Thank you. 152 00:14:08,800 --> 00:14:11,800 Does anybody have any questions for the applicant at this time? 153 00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:13,800 No. 154 00:14:13,800 --> 00:14:14,800 Okay. 155 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:15,800 I'm going to open for public comment. 156 00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:17,800 My redo we have any public comment cards. 157 00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:22,800 I didn't receive any, but I do believe there are a few members of the public that wish to speak. 158 00:14:22,800 --> 00:14:27,800 Come on up. 159 00:14:27,800 --> 00:14:28,800 Hey, my name is Sean Hughes. 160 00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:35,800 I live at 910 Shelbert Court, which is in the Jason property to the 808 capital of property. 161 00:14:35,800 --> 00:14:42,800 I'm here to urge the planning commission to reject the recommendation that the 808 capital of drive development is exempt from. 162 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:58,800 The staff analysis is fundamentally flawed because it analyzes this proposed development in isolation and not in conjunction with a similar proposed development on a similar timeline at an adjacent law at 804 capital. 163 00:14:58,800 --> 00:14:59,800 No one is the hardest. 164 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:08,200 Village subdivision 2, where an additional 9 homes have received tentative approval for development. The staff analysis recommends a 165 00:15:08,200 --> 00:15:18,200 sequence exemption, however, sequela expressly states that the exemptions cannot be considered if the cumulative impacts for multiple projects have not been properly analyzed. 166 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:28,200 Not only does the staff analysis not address the cumulative impacts from adjacent lots being developed for 17 additional homes, possibly even simultaneously. 167 00:15:28,200 --> 00:15:43,200 It barely even references the tentative approval at 804 Capitola, which I have to say was a process right with its own massive irregularities, especially pertaining to public notification and the ownership of the property by a commission member. 168 00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:51,200 Both of these proposals 804 and 808 Capitola essentially maximize the housing density of 2 small lots. 169 00:15:52,200 --> 00:16:03,200 The reality is that adding 17 homes would have massive impacts on traffic, parking, noise, the environment and the quality of life for the current residents in the neighborhood. 170 00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:13,200 The job of this commission is to represent nap at residents and not developers. The commission should not rush to advance proposals from developers without due consideration for current residents. 171 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:18,200 Follow the law and reject this poorly formed recommendation for a sequel waiver. Thank you. 172 00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:20,200 Thank you. 173 00:16:20,200 --> 00:16:34,200 Hi, my name is Noah. I live at 925 Cheloper Court, the direct neighbor behind the proposed data weight capitola. 174 00:16:35,200 --> 00:16:41,200 I would also like to encourage you to reject the current proposal for a sequel exemption. 175 00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:52,200 Similar to what Sean just mentioned, it doesn't take into account the fact that both of these projects are happening at the same time, and it also doesn't take into account. 176 00:16:53,200 --> 00:16:59,200 Well, my personal experience with the developers and the landowners so far. 177 00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:05,200 I've had multiple issues with them. They've had illegal parking lots in both of those sections. 178 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:14,200 I believe it's a conflict of interest and I'm glad Lisa left, but it's a conflict of interest to have one of the owners here on the commission. 179 00:17:15,200 --> 00:17:22,200 They've opened the two lots together. I believe about a year and a half ago last bottle rock they had cars. 180 00:17:22,200 --> 00:17:28,200 They had the lot open so clearly the two of the two lots are working together and are very friendly at the very least. 181 00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:34,200 I think that this shows a clear conflict of interest in kind of what is happening. 182 00:17:35,200 --> 00:17:43,200 And yeah, I would just encourage you to kind of look at things in a holistic sense and really look at what's happening. 183 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:45,200 Thank you. 184 00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:55,200 Hello, my name is Marianne Elzworth. I live at one capital record. 185 00:17:56,200 --> 00:18:03,200 So if you can take the overhead view of the neighborhood that has the streets. 186 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:27,200 The property, you see that big pond there. I have questions about drainage and the water that could potentially flood across and has in previous years when the rain has been torrential that pond overflowed. 187 00:18:27,200 --> 00:18:41,200 And the infill that I don't know whether it was legal or illegally happening on 808 to build up for the bottle rock parking has overloaded the drains. 188 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:49,200 And I've noticed the last big rain we had the drain, the water is coming up through the drains and my property. 189 00:18:49,200 --> 00:19:00,200 So I want there to be consideration about what happens with that water. I believe it's supposed to go from the pond under so we're on a trail. I don't know all the specifics. 190 00:19:01,200 --> 00:19:12,200 And then also connecting capital to drive, you know, you'll be putting a lot of traffic on those streets that right now can't even accommodate to a traffic because people are parking on the streets. 191 00:19:12,200 --> 00:19:24,200 Because those neighborhoods are old and were built for having cars parked on the streets. So I think there needs to be more consideration before this is approved. 192 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:26,200 Thank you. 193 00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:29,200 Does anybody else wish to speak? 194 00:19:30,200 --> 00:19:35,200 No, seeing their normal requests to speak is our motion to close public comment. 195 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:43,200 So moved second all those in favor by my public comments closed. 196 00:19:44,200 --> 00:19:46,200 Does anybody have any questions for staff for the applicant? 197 00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:52,200 Can we ask the applicant to speak to the drainage issue that was raised by Marian. 198 00:19:52,200 --> 00:20:05,200 Good evening. Chair, we sell RSA plus. 199 00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:12,200 Do we have a, I don't know what plan you have, Paul, that we could show that he shows at least a site plan that might work. 200 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:15,200 So the drainage is kind of unique in this location. 201 00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:24,200 There's drainage kind of off to the north there that comes down and there's all kind of empty into the pond including this property now flows towards the pond. 202 00:20:25,200 --> 00:20:31,200 I think that pond was, I think it was man made maybe 30, 40 years ago. This is off the property. It's a separate property owner. 203 00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:36,200 And so there are numerous pipes that discharge into that pond. 204 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:46,200 This project is doing city standards. We are going to be collecting our run off detaining it to the city standard level and then discharge into the pipe that it disorders into now that does go into the pond. 205 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:55,200 Right, so the, the pond, you know, I can't speak to the pond on whether or not it's how it functions when water gets into there, but we are, we're not adding any more water into the pond that's going there now. 206 00:20:56,200 --> 00:20:59,200 So we're meeting the city standard and just charging into the pond. 207 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:15,200 So to clarify, basically, the existing condition of the pond is not being improved, but it is not necessarily being made worse either. 208 00:21:16,200 --> 00:21:17,200 That's great. 209 00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:30,200 And I did want to clarify to one of the earlier pieces where there are eight lots here, and there's also a separate lot, or I think it says parcel either, so that's a, like a common lot, so that is there is a number lot that's there. 210 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:38,200 And then you see the driveway off to the, the south. So there will be a, there's an easement for that driveway to access that detached garage on lot. 211 00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:49,200 But that's six there eight eight. Oh yeah, that's six further eight. So the easement over parcel A is to so there is there's eight lots plus the open space parcel. 212 00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:53,200 Thank you. 213 00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:56,200 Can I ask a question. 214 00:21:57,200 --> 00:22:07,200 There, your subdivision creates the eight residential lots and then the lot that shown is the bio retention lot is that correct. 215 00:22:08,200 --> 00:22:14,200 Does it, what does it do with the area that constitutes the private drive? 216 00:22:16,200 --> 00:22:37,200 What does it do with the area that, as far as what? Well, would that retain, would that stay in the ownership of the current property owner, or would it be combined with the other common lot, or what happens to that, who, who becomes the owner of the public. 217 00:22:38,200 --> 00:22:48,200 That's the private drive. That's the question. So I, you know, I'll guess what Chris might say, but I mean, I would think that like the, the easement over there and the person who has the driveway that easement. 218 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:59,200 That would be their maintenance, you know, be prescribed like in the CC and ours of some sort that that driveway maintenance is not for that just a driveway that that garage is not the responsibility of the whole eight. 219 00:23:00,200 --> 00:23:04,200 It's just the responsibility of, there'll be something on that easement that is there's to maintain. 220 00:23:05,200 --> 00:23:14,200 So the eight, the lots, then they, that you're creating run to the center line of the private drive. 221 00:23:15,200 --> 00:23:20,200 I think you guys are talking about two different things, Jeremy's talking about the driveway is bigger talking about the street. 222 00:23:21,200 --> 00:23:27,200 I'm talking, yeah, the, the hammer, the T area on that map. 223 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:34,200 Okay, so I thought you're talking about the, the bio. If we move over to the street now, so that the parcel. 224 00:23:35,200 --> 00:23:37,200 The street out, not capitol was right. 225 00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:43,200 The private street that, that, that shape like a horizontal T there. 226 00:23:44,200 --> 00:23:46,200 Yeah, who's going to be the owner. 227 00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:50,200 So that would, that would be part of the, you know, there's going to be some sort of maintenance agreement. 228 00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:56,200 I mean, you know, some, I don't want to call it an inch away, but if the maintenance agreement that includes the bio and it includes the proportionate share. 229 00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:00,200 Eightths, and it's share of the street maintenance of understood. 230 00:24:01,200 --> 00:24:06,200 The city has an issue right now. 231 00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:10,200 Well, it's, I think it's just clarifying for the record and more or less than it is. 232 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:17,200 Clarifying for the record that it likely to come as a form of maintenance agreement and reciprocal access agreement. 233 00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:20,200 And then the maintenance agreement will speak to the share. 234 00:24:20,200 --> 00:24:23,200 Um, between the individual lots is that. 235 00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:28,200 How else would you do it? I guess I could be a common space parcel. 236 00:24:29,200 --> 00:24:31,200 That's still maintained, you know, equally by the eight owners. 237 00:24:32,200 --> 00:24:46,200 Right. And my question really doesn't go to the maintenance. I understand that there'll be a maintenance agreement that addresses the private drive I'm assuming, and the bio retention parcel. 238 00:24:46,200 --> 00:25:04,200 Uh, but, uh, there would be then a T-shaped strip of land that nobody owns that isn't conveyed to an HOA or anything like that. 239 00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:08,200 Do you have the parcel map? I don't need sure the parcel's like. 240 00:25:09,200 --> 00:25:12,200 Uh, I can pull it up. Do you mind putting it on screensaver? 241 00:25:17,200 --> 00:25:26,200 Dan, is your question whether the street is also a separate parcel? Yes, or could it, or could it be combined with the bio retention parcel? 242 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:35,200 Uh, the question arises because, uh, who would own that parcel? 243 00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:42,200 I understand that the homeowners would enter into an agreement to maintain that parcel. 244 00:25:42,200 --> 00:25:51,200 Just like they would with respect to the common bio retention parcel, which I understand the HOA would own. 245 00:25:52,200 --> 00:26:03,200 But there's that T-shaped land strip that will be paved and used as a common drive, but the ownership of that strip. 246 00:26:04,200 --> 00:26:08,200 Yeah. Right. That's, that's my question. 247 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:12,200 Stumpedum. Do you mind turning it back on? There we go. 248 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:27,200 Right or what usually happens in this situation? 249 00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:40,200 So it takes two forms. You can have an an easement where the individual property lines will go out to the street, and then the easement is prescriptive of maintenance obligations. 250 00:26:41,200 --> 00:26:50,200 And it's usually explained in such a way that it still takes the form of like an HOA in identifying who's responsible for the cost, who's responsible for maintenance. 251 00:26:50,200 --> 00:27:01,200 And at times, it can also be a common space parcel owned by the HOA association and then the maintenance and the CCNRs will identify who's responsible for payment. 252 00:27:02,200 --> 00:27:04,200 So can you go to responsible for repair? 253 00:27:05,200 --> 00:27:06,200 You go to the coverage sheet inside the first page. 254 00:27:07,200 --> 00:27:11,200 So right there in the bottom right there. Like, so that's a, like, can you, I don't think you can zoom in right there right there. 255 00:27:12,200 --> 00:27:14,200 And it's that's kind of the clearest easy picture to look at. 256 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:30,200 So I guess, so right now, I guess the answer is like, we're not only to the center of the street, right running just so there's right, so, so I think is point of clarity in the, in the plan it shows a common space parcel at the private street. 257 00:27:31,200 --> 00:27:40,200 So, so we'd like to slide a street, I guess like you see clear here, right, so yeah it's just like not it's not owned of the center of the street it's owned. 258 00:27:41,200 --> 00:27:43,200 The end of the back of there the curb or whatever it is right. 259 00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:54,200 So for purposes of the recorded map and I mean liability does it get glammed on with the bioretention parcel. 260 00:27:57,200 --> 00:28:03,200 There will be different language specific to that parcel, but yeah effectively the association that's created. 261 00:28:04,200 --> 00:28:22,200 Would assume maintenance ownership and maintenance obligations of both the street and the bioretention so was it really ten parcels was it's technically still an eight lot subdivision with two open space parcels if you will or common ownership parcels. 262 00:28:23,200 --> 00:28:24,200 Interesting. Thank you. 263 00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:29,200 It's still an eight lot subdivision. Let's just a new one. Right. Right. 264 00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:32,200 Thanks a lot Dan. 265 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:38,200 Thank you. 266 00:28:39,200 --> 00:28:40,200 That's okay. 267 00:28:41,200 --> 00:28:44,200 Are there any other additional questions or comments for the applicant or staff? 268 00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:46,200 Yeah, go ahead. 269 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:50,200 Sorry, you may need to come back up. 270 00:28:51,200 --> 00:29:01,200 I was hoping that the applicant team could speak to the choice to utilize a hammerhead and. 271 00:29:03,200 --> 00:29:08,200 Was it did you look at potentially contacting the adjacent. 272 00:29:09,200 --> 00:29:13,200 Property and connecting potentially to the other private drive there. 273 00:29:14,200 --> 00:29:16,200 What was the thought process? 274 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:20,200 So we did a couple of things that the roads would not align. 275 00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:26,200 So it would you have to jog the road to get it to a line for the center of the street behind it. 276 00:29:27,200 --> 00:29:30,200 Also, I'm not sure whether that's an HOA behind us or. 277 00:29:32,200 --> 00:29:41,200 Or whether that's another kind of road maintenance agreement set up, but those do tend to be, you know, it's you got to get however many eight neighbors to agree to open this up. 278 00:29:41,200 --> 00:29:45,200 And it seemed like it was probably a long show. We did think about it. We talked about it. 279 00:29:46,200 --> 00:29:49,200 But it would have been great for our side of the roads aligned. It would have been super efficient. 280 00:29:50,200 --> 00:29:52,200 Really it came down to the hammerhead or. 281 00:29:53,200 --> 00:29:59,200 Or a cold sack and we ultimately went with the hammerhead. We requested to go with the hammerhead because we wanted to. 282 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:23,000 The width of the cold sack really eats into a lot of number 7 there. And with the pretty significant change in the topography of the site, the change in grade, it made it hard to get, we were interested in creating housing for the city of Africa, and that would have eliminated one of the parcels. 283 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:33,000 So, even then, the grading would have been challenging to get that large and flat area set up in the middle of the site, so that's why we chose to go with Amber. 284 00:30:33,000 --> 00:30:43,000 Okay, I understand, just in general, Amber has not my favorite, and I would have loved to have seen connectivity, but if that wasn't an option, I understand. 285 00:30:43,000 --> 00:30:53,000 I'd also recognize that you're willing to enjoy eliminating, in that case, one to two parcels and one to two homes, so definitely respect that, just wanting to clarification. 286 00:30:53,000 --> 00:30:55,000 Thank you. 287 00:30:55,000 --> 00:31:04,000 Can someone from staff speak to Noah and Sean's concern of the cumulative lots? I can see. 288 00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:11,000 So it's very likely actually with the combination of the two would still benefit from an infill exemption. 289 00:31:11,000 --> 00:31:25,000 It's important to note that the general plan I identified potential density abilities, so it perceived a residential density that would actually be higher than this subdivision allows. 290 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:44,000 Really, parts of this size don't typically raise to certain impacts that would be significant unavoidable, nor would they raise in this instance to evidence that impacts that need to be mitigated at all. 291 00:31:44,000 --> 00:31:58,000 So it's important to recognize that the projects aren't successive in the form of a cumulative, because they are independent projects that have been entitled independent timelines. 292 00:31:58,000 --> 00:32:10,000 But assuming that there's still the ability based on the size of the properties to benefit from an infill exemption, because that extends up to five acres and size. 293 00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:28,000 It's also important to note from a transportation standpoint, because there have been other comments received about parking within the general neighborhood and the impacts to the neighborhood based on other projects, so the other projects aren't on the agenda, but parking and itself is not in environmental impact. 294 00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:43,000 But when you look at the benefit of the capital of drive extension, our traffic engineer likes to put it in the frame of mind of like a sprinkler system with one sprinkler and the pressure that feeds into one sprinkler. 295 00:32:43,000 --> 00:32:53,000 And when you start adding sprinkler heads or adding opportunities for different access points, it actually relieves pressure onto the roadway systems. 296 00:32:53,000 --> 00:33:03,000 But I think in summary that hasn't been any substantial evidence submitted on the record to conclude that an infill exemption is not appropriate. 297 00:33:03,000 --> 00:33:05,000 Thank you. 298 00:33:05,000 --> 00:33:09,000 Public comments closed. 299 00:33:09,000 --> 00:33:17,000 Are there any other questions for staff or the applicant? 300 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:27,000 It's important to note that they can speak if the chair is willing to give them the opportunity. 301 00:33:27,000 --> 00:33:32,000 Yes, you may speak. One more time. One more time. Let's go. 302 00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:45,000 I just wanted to ask a question because you specifically said it's very likely that it wouldn't raise to the thing isn't that exactly what sequence design to do is to study this and determine whether or not it does raise to that level. 303 00:33:45,000 --> 00:34:04,000 And without without being able to do the study, how do you like I know you can say it's very likely that it won't, but that's what sequence design to do and doesn't sequence specifically say that when there are multiple projects you shouldn't take them in isolation and that you should take them all together. 304 00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:16,000 It looks into cumulative projects that are deemed successive projects and so successive is actually a very narrow definition. 305 00:34:16,000 --> 00:34:33,000 Yeah, the cumulative provisions that I think you're referring to in the sequence guidelines that provide an exception to the application of an exemption is not in your head, right? 306 00:34:33,000 --> 00:34:48,000 Yeah, staff have actually evaluated the project they put the two parcels together and even together they qualify for the exemption. 307 00:34:48,000 --> 00:35:06,000 So the exemption provides for five acre developments that meet the general plan standards and the exemptions are actually very strictly construed. 308 00:35:06,000 --> 00:35:21,000 So while you could argue that, you know, you should win and doubt do more environmental. 309 00:35:21,000 --> 00:35:33,000 On the other hand, exemptions are intended to streamline the process and the city could be subject to challenge for not applying this particular exemption. 310 00:35:33,000 --> 00:35:46,000 Because if you walk through the categories that are at issue, even the two projects combined together meet every one of the standards. 311 00:35:46,000 --> 00:36:15,000 So I mean, staff appears to have correctly evaluated it and it would be as counsel it would be my recommendation that the exemptions apply and of course, you know people are subject to disagree and have their remedies, but staff seems to have done an adequate job here of evaluating. 312 00:36:15,000 --> 00:36:19,000 Thank you, Dan and Raider. 313 00:36:19,000 --> 00:36:23,000 I have a follow up question for Raider regarding the pond thing again. 314 00:36:23,000 --> 00:36:39,000 I know that's a separate parcel, but what is the city's approach to that surface retention on the adjacent parcel? What what happens in general if that pond is problematic. 315 00:36:39,000 --> 00:36:51,000 Like if it is subject to backing up into drains as Mrs. Ellsworth mentioned and things like that what. 316 00:36:51,000 --> 00:37:08,000 What's the deal with that thing trying to follow so if so storm drainage facilities are usually annually inspected and then have to be maintained and then there are certain obligations to maintenance and those can take different forms. 317 00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:26,000 It's primarily on site retention of facilities than you obviously have associations that maintain that and so in this instance you're not looking at any additional drainage than what's already existing but as far as maintenance obligations. 318 00:37:27,000 --> 00:37:34,000 I'm really more asking for her edification the parcel that is not part of this application. 319 00:37:34,000 --> 00:37:45,000 The response from the applicant which is generally satisfactory to me is we're not making the situation any worse and it's someone else's parcel if it's not a great situation. 320 00:37:45,000 --> 00:37:55,000 But as someone who's living next to this where her drains allegedly have a problem from this adjacent pond. 321 00:37:55,000 --> 00:38:06,000 What happens there? I know this is a little bit off of track. I'm just trying to like give her something to go on. 322 00:38:06,000 --> 00:38:18,000 Understood. What mean see there's usually an independent drainage form of analysis that has to be calculated and prepared and subject to the review of public works department. 323 00:38:18,000 --> 00:38:34,000 So to that specific requirement because it falls onto a private property it's through the agreement that's executed between both the association here and that private property owner. 324 00:38:36,000 --> 00:39:03,000 So the agreement would outline responsibilities as it pertains to drainage but what I would say is that usually it's it's not to uncommon for certain drainage facilities to feed into other waterways it's just that no additional no net like additional water would feed into those waterways. 325 00:39:03,000 --> 00:39:09,000 I mean I just interjects a question just to be clear when I visited the site. 326 00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:17,000 And I believe it was already mentioned the pond in question is not a part of this property. 327 00:39:17,000 --> 00:39:23,000 So I don't understand why we are having this conversation right now. 328 00:39:23,000 --> 00:39:30,000 I'm trying to just give give the I understand but I feel like this is not the planning commissions. 329 00:39:30,000 --> 00:39:32,000 I'm sorry I'm sorry I didn't mean to. 330 00:39:32,000 --> 00:39:43,000 So it's still drainage as it pertains to this this project so there's there's a portion of this conversation that is subject to the review of the commission. 331 00:39:43,000 --> 00:39:53,000 Okay then fantastic I just wanted to make sure that we're not veering from what we are tasked with so apologies for the confusion. 332 00:39:53,000 --> 00:40:09,000 I just needed clarity because I again saw the pond the pond looks like it needs some assistance of some kind but yeah so where where can we land here to find a resolution. 333 00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:15,000 I don't think there's anything for us to do I just wanted her to have some some thing to take home with her. 334 00:40:15,000 --> 00:40:17,000 Got it yeah. 335 00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:21,000 That's it thank you I don't want to follow up on that at all. 336 00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:41,000 May I not to belabor the point here but if there's an existing condition on that property and it sounds like it's historically been a problem right then I mean the people who are experiencing or suffering from that condition. 337 00:40:41,000 --> 00:41:01,000 You know they can come to meetings of the city and voice the concern about the problem that's existing on that parcel and you know I don't know the details of it it could give rise to a nuisance claim or it could give rise to a claim that. 338 00:41:01,000 --> 00:41:11,000 The people who own that property aren't managing it correctly or you know there are other remedies and to your point. 339 00:41:11,000 --> 00:41:19,000 The project that's before you tonight has done what it's supposed to do so. 340 00:41:19,000 --> 00:41:22,000 I don't know if that helps or not. 341 00:41:22,000 --> 00:41:25,000 That's very helpful thank you Dan. 342 00:41:25,000 --> 00:41:30,000 Does anybody have any additional questions for staff for the applicant. 343 00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:32,000 No okay. 344 00:41:32,000 --> 00:41:34,000 Bring it back to deliver it. 345 00:41:34,000 --> 00:41:38,000 Does anybody want to start. 346 00:41:38,000 --> 00:41:39,000 No. 347 00:41:39,000 --> 00:41:42,000 I'll start. 348 00:41:42,000 --> 00:41:52,000 I think that it is recognized globally that infill housing is necessary critical and mandated by the state. 349 00:41:52,000 --> 00:41:56,000 This does accomplish that at less than. 350 00:41:56,000 --> 00:41:59,000 The maximum density which could be put here. 351 00:41:59,000 --> 00:42:06,000 I commend Paul and the rest of the staff for doing all their diligence to do an excellent job at it. 352 00:42:06,000 --> 00:42:08,000 And I support the project. 353 00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:10,000 Thank you. 354 00:42:10,000 --> 00:42:11,000 Beverly. 355 00:42:11,000 --> 00:42:12,000 Commissioner. 356 00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:23,000 Apologies for this lingering cough I am not contagious I've had this for two weeks it just won't go away. 357 00:42:23,000 --> 00:42:30,000 So apologies I made very well cough during this so apologies in advance. 358 00:42:30,000 --> 00:42:33,000 I. 359 00:42:33,000 --> 00:42:39,000 And very impressed with the designs the architectural designs blew my mind away. 360 00:42:39,000 --> 00:42:45,000 I checked out the the development team the architectural firm. 361 00:42:45,000 --> 00:42:51,000 I looked at their portfolio their website was very impressed with their mission statement. 362 00:42:51,000 --> 00:42:59,000 I found out what what what drives them to do what they do and what they've done all over the world. 363 00:42:59,000 --> 00:43:02,000 And I feel. 364 00:43:02,000 --> 00:43:06,000 That we're very fortunate to have this project before us. 365 00:43:06,000 --> 00:43:10,000 I love the designs they are in homage to our historic. 366 00:43:10,000 --> 00:43:12,000 Jim's. 367 00:43:12,000 --> 00:43:15,000 They you know they. 368 00:43:15,000 --> 00:43:25,000 They are beautiful they will be beautifully done I'm sure and just in terms of the materials and the design and and the track record of the team. 369 00:43:25,000 --> 00:43:28,000 I feel that. 370 00:43:28,000 --> 00:43:37,000 The parking situation is this is not presenting a parking problem because they're going beyond their parking standards. 371 00:43:37,000 --> 00:43:40,000 We want to talk about the parking problem in the neighborhood. 372 00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:50,000 That may be something that you want to lobby the state's legislature because when people put in 80 use and in fill housing parking is no longer required. 373 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:57,000 So that's a whole separate issue but I don't feel that that relates to this project before us. 374 00:43:57,000 --> 00:44:06,000 But that is we do have we do have parking issues and they are becoming more problematic as a result of the state's legislature. 375 00:44:06,000 --> 00:44:13,000 And what else did I have to say about this. 376 00:44:13,000 --> 00:44:24,000 I love that it's a mix of architectural designs that they're not it's not like track housing. 377 00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:33,000 And I could go on and on and on about how enamored I am with the actual designs but you get the point I. 378 00:44:33,000 --> 00:44:38,000 I don't feel that there's anything negative about this particular subdivision. 379 00:44:38,000 --> 00:44:45,000 I think it's creating some wonderful homes in a very unique area and it will probably improve. 380 00:44:45,000 --> 00:44:51,000 The values of other you know homes as a result. 381 00:44:51,000 --> 00:44:53,000 Thank you. 382 00:44:53,000 --> 00:44:56,000 Are you back? 383 00:44:57,000 --> 00:44:58,000 I. 384 00:44:58,000 --> 00:45:00,000 To not repeat things I'll just say that I. 385 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:26,000 I go comments of my full commissioners. And despite my comments about the connectivity east and west, ultimately, this area, in terms of the street grid, it's not really actually, I'm going to grid at this point in this area. So I'm really pleased to see that there'll be further connection with the extension and connection of capital to drive. 386 00:45:26,000 --> 00:45:44,000 It's going to be not just a benefit to the folks that reside in this subdivision, but the entire area, and definitely a step in the right direction in my opinion, in terms of improving accessibility and connectivity in this part of the city and architecture is great. And I support the project. 387 00:45:44,000 --> 00:45:46,000 Thank you. 388 00:45:46,000 --> 00:45:55,000 I echo a lot of what the fellow commissioners have said, especially the connectivity of capital to drive infill housing for us is fantastic. 389 00:45:55,000 --> 00:45:59,000 There was some emotions here tonight, and then the emails that we received. 390 00:45:59,000 --> 00:46:08,000 So I just want to strongly encourage the applicant and the development team to continue engaging constructively and transparently with the surrounding neighbors. 391 00:46:08,000 --> 00:46:16,000 The success of the project is not only the compliance of the regulations that design, but also how it integrates with the existing community. 392 00:46:16,000 --> 00:46:21,000 But this is a fantastic project, and I'm excited to see it be built. 393 00:46:21,000 --> 00:46:28,000 All right, shall we search? Anybody want to make a motion? 394 00:46:28,000 --> 00:46:32,000 I can't get through it. 395 00:46:32,000 --> 00:46:36,000 Thank you. 396 00:46:36,000 --> 00:46:38,000 Okay. 397 00:46:38,000 --> 00:46:50,000 I move that we forward a recommendation to city council to adopt a resolution, approving a tentative subdivision map and design review permit to divide the parcel into 398 00:46:50,000 --> 00:46:54,000 eight single family lots with detached single family residential homes. 399 00:46:54,000 --> 00:47:02,000 And associated site and landscape improvements, including retaining walls over three feet in height and one parcel containing the sites shared by a retention facility. 400 00:47:02,000 --> 00:47:15,000 And a use permit of the creation of two flag lots and the application of small lot development standards for property located at 808 capital drive and determining that the project is exempt from sequence. 401 00:47:15,000 --> 00:47:17,000 Thank you. 402 00:47:17,000 --> 00:47:19,000 Second, second, only favor. 403 00:47:19,000 --> 00:47:20,000 Aye. 404 00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:21,000 Motion passes. 405 00:47:21,000 --> 00:47:23,000 Congratulations. 406 00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:25,000 All right. 407 00:47:25,000 --> 00:47:30,000 There are no administrative reports. 408 00:47:30,000 --> 00:47:36,000 There are any comments by commissioners and or staff. 409 00:47:36,000 --> 00:47:39,000 Take vitamins and supplements. 410 00:47:39,000 --> 00:47:40,000 Rest well. 411 00:47:40,000 --> 00:47:42,000 Drink plenty of water. 412 00:47:42,000 --> 00:47:44,000 Don't get what I had. 413 00:47:45,000 --> 00:47:48,000 Well, thank you for still coming tonight. 414 00:47:48,000 --> 00:47:53,000 Sorry for jumping in there with the public comment closed thing. 415 00:47:53,000 --> 00:47:59,000 Reactionary didn't want to open a debate with staff in the public forum like that, but I think it was fine. 416 00:47:59,000 --> 00:48:01,000 I thought that was so thoughtful of you. 417 00:48:01,000 --> 00:48:05,000 And I always appreciate that we do acknowledge the letters. 418 00:48:05,000 --> 00:48:10,000 And I just I just started feeling that it was beyond. 419 00:48:10,000 --> 00:48:12,000 What we were. 420 00:48:12,000 --> 00:48:17,000 Test with so apologies if I came across as the. 421 00:48:17,000 --> 00:48:23,000 I think it's the it's the horseness in my voice that doesn't give that sweet quality is. 422 00:48:23,000 --> 00:48:26,000 You know, inquiring. 423 00:48:26,000 --> 00:48:28,000 Any other comments. 424 00:48:28,000 --> 00:48:29,000 No. 425 00:48:29,000 --> 00:48:30,000 Just. 426 00:48:30,000 --> 00:48:31,000 It's very well said. 427 00:48:31,000 --> 00:48:32,000 Thank you. 428 00:48:32,000 --> 00:48:33,000 Thank you. 429 00:48:33,000 --> 00:48:34,000 Great. 430 00:48:34,000 --> 00:48:35,000 All right. 431 00:48:35,000 --> 00:48:37,000 I think we have somebody at the audience. 432 00:48:37,000 --> 00:48:38,000 Okay, I'm going to say, Molly. 433 00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:40,000 Again, community resources and development director. 434 00:48:40,000 --> 00:48:43,000 I'm sure writer has some updates for you. 435 00:48:43,000 --> 00:48:45,000 It's he prepares every, every time for you. 436 00:48:45,000 --> 00:48:46,000 But. 437 00:48:46,000 --> 00:48:49,000 You received an email from me, but I just wanted to formally in this meeting. 438 00:48:49,000 --> 00:48:51,000 Congratulations right. 439 00:48:51,000 --> 00:48:54,000 On his appointment to the planning manager position. 440 00:48:54,000 --> 00:48:55,000 Officially. 441 00:48:55,000 --> 00:48:58,000 As you saw in my email. 442 00:48:58,000 --> 00:49:01,000 It was a open city. 443 00:49:01,000 --> 00:49:04,000 Open recruitment. 444 00:49:04,000 --> 00:49:05,000 We had lots of qualified applicants. 445 00:49:05,000 --> 00:49:09,160 applicants writer had to go through three interview processes which is you can imagine as an internal 446 00:49:09,160 --> 00:49:14,920 candidate it can be a little bit nerve-wracking and did a fantastic job and has really shown 447 00:49:14,920 --> 00:49:22,040 us through both his interim stint and his years here at the city that he's such an asset to the 448 00:49:22,040 --> 00:49:27,080 city so I'm thrilled to appoint him to that position and well he officially starts the role 449 00:49:27,080 --> 00:49:32,760 on Monday we we're calling in the planning manager already so congratulations congratulations 450 00:49:33,720 --> 00:49:39,320 and with that writer do you have anything to report for us just a couple not not too many today 451 00:49:41,080 --> 00:49:48,600 will just want to to to remind well to bring attention to the fact that there's still ongoing 452 00:49:48,600 --> 00:49:55,400 efforts in the outreach to assist with a bottle rock operations as businesses like to expand 453 00:49:55,400 --> 00:50:01,560 and the city likes to provide an opportunity for them to expand within reason 454 00:50:01,560 --> 00:50:06,280 and in a safe manner so in through consultation with planning staff economic development 455 00:50:07,320 --> 00:50:12,520 fire police department in working with businesses giving them an opportunity to 456 00:50:13,320 --> 00:50:19,720 to do that given the additional foot traffic that that bottle rock brings 457 00:50:21,800 --> 00:50:29,640 the other aspect is do have some some projects still coming on their horizon with the agenda for 458 00:50:29,640 --> 00:50:37,560 cast some pretty notable projects so continue to follow the agenda for cast if you do have any 459 00:50:37,560 --> 00:50:43,160 time conflicts or any other conflicts with those projects just let us know in advance because we 460 00:50:43,160 --> 00:50:49,480 we like to schedule and and at times applications they like to to see a full body in the planning 461 00:50:49,480 --> 00:50:55,240 commission to to understand especially if projects can can be contentious and not saying that 462 00:50:55,240 --> 00:51:01,800 contentious projects are on the horizon but just something to note then that's that's pretty 463 00:51:01,800 --> 00:51:13,720 much it for tonight do you have any comments can I just congratulations and a reminder about the 464 00:51:13,720 --> 00:51:19,960 boards and commissions dinner thank you thank you I am going to take the moment to make a comment 465 00:51:19,960 --> 00:51:25,480 because may is mental health awareness month and I serve on the stewardship committee for 466 00:51:25,480 --> 00:51:31,000 mentis which is a local nonprofit organization that provides critical mental health services to the 467 00:51:31,000 --> 00:51:37,080 members of our community and one of the main focuses this year is our youth especially as our school 468 00:51:37,080 --> 00:51:42,520 district continues to face funding cuts that impacts mental health resources and support services that 469 00:51:42,520 --> 00:51:48,840 they used to receive and the statistics surrounding our local youth struggling with feelings of hopelessness 470 00:51:48,840 --> 00:51:54,760 worthlessness and suicidal thoughts are staggering and deeply concerning so I encourage everyone 471 00:51:54,760 --> 00:52:00,920 to visit mentis's website at mentisnap.org to learn more about the work they do and how you can 472 00:52:00,920 --> 00:52:05,560 support and get involved in their important efforts and I also urge the members of our community to 473 00:52:05,560 --> 00:52:10,760 continue checking in on one another especially our young people and to help foster culture we're 474 00:52:10,760 --> 00:52:15,880 seeking mental health support is encouraged and mental health is treated with the care and attention that 475 00:52:15,960 --> 00:52:21,800 it deserves and that is all I have to say thank you this meeting is adjourned and we will meet again 476 00:52:21,800 --> 00:52:29,400 on June 4th as the May 21st 2026 meeting is scheduled to be canceled thank you