1 00:00:28,850 --> 00:00:38,730 I'm going to call this meeting to order. This is a regular meeting of the Pistil Beach City Council. It is Tuesday, April 15, 2025, at 5.30 p.m., roll call, please. 2 00:01:06,620 --> 00:01:07,260 The 3 00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:15,300 next item is acceptance of the agenda and he changes from the published agenda to 4 00:01:15,300 --> 00:01:16,380 agenda for the council? 5 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:19,520 Seeing none, we have a presentation. 6 00:01:20,960 --> 00:01:24,000 And with the council's begin reading the proclamation. 7 00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:27,260 And Mr. Juan Ramirez, could you join me at the podium? 8 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:29,560 A proclamation of the City Council 9 00:01:29,560 --> 00:01:31,160 of City of Pizmo Beach, California, 10 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:34,860 recognizing April 2025 as Sexual Assault Awareness Month. 11 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:38,140 Whereas sexual assault awareness month 12 00:01:38,140 --> 00:01:40,120 calls attention to the fact that sexual assault 13 00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:43,440 is widespread and impacts every person in Pizmo Beach. 14 00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:52,680 And whereas luminalized provides essential life-saving services for survivors, their children and families throughout San Francisco County in Pismo Beach and 15 00:01:53,580 --> 00:01:58,540 Where as sexual assault, assault can result in physical injury, 16 00:01:59,380 --> 00:02:05,200 psychological trauma, and even death. The devastating consequences of sexual assault 17 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:09,740 can cross generations and could last a lifetime. 18 00:02:09,740 --> 00:02:17,560 And whereas there is a need to focus on the individualized needs of sexual assault survivors, 19 00:02:18,210 --> 00:02:26,360 and whereas the marginalization of certain groups in society, including undocumented individuals, 20 00:02:26,740 --> 00:02:32,360 transgender individuals, and those living with disabilities increase their vulnerability 21 00:02:32,710 --> 00:02:34,140 to sexual assault. 22 00:02:34,140 --> 00:02:56,860 And whereas Lumina alliance continues to provide a safe environment to those affected by sexual assault with a 24-hour crisis line, advocacy, therapy, transitional and emergency housing and prevention education with the help of dedicated volunteers and professionals. 23 00:02:56,860 --> 00:03:24,520 And whereas Lumina alliance has received our 2000 calls to the crisis and information line provided housing for 171 emergency shelter clients including 70 children and provided more than 4,200 hours of therapy and whereas Lumina alliance serves as a bright light during dark times for survivors of sexual assault illuminating a path towards safety and healing. 24 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:30,620 And, whereas the City of Pistomal Beach strongly supports the efforts of Lumina Alliance, 25 00:03:30,920 --> 00:03:35,640 how every segment of our society can work together to address sexual assault, 26 00:03:36,220 --> 00:03:41,140 and how to help survivors connect with services. 27 00:03:41,460 --> 00:03:49,440 Now, therefore, the City of Pistomal Beach hereby recognizes April 2025 as sexual assault awareness month. 28 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:53,860 dated this 15th date of April 2025, Ed Waggy-Mayor. 29 00:03:58,660 --> 00:04:04,440 And with me is Mr. Juan Ramirez from Aluminum Alliance Board of Directors who will be accepting 30 00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:09,140 the proclamation and we just appreciate all that Aluminum Alliance does to help those that 31 00:04:09,140 --> 00:04:09,660 need. 32 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:11,400 So if you'd like to say a few words. 33 00:04:12,540 --> 00:04:13,700 Yes, thank you Mayor. 34 00:04:14,920 --> 00:04:18,380 Thank you to the City Council members for this proclamation. 35 00:04:18,380 --> 00:04:22,280 My name is Juan Ramirez, I'm the Board of Directors for Lumina Alliance. 36 00:04:22,740 --> 00:04:28,200 For over 40 years, Lumina has been supporting survivors of sexual assault and intimate partner violence. 37 00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:34,660 Our mission is to empower those impacted through, in the very support, healing and prevention programs. 38 00:04:38,550 --> 00:04:45,430 We provide a 24 hour crisis and information line, legal referrals, emergency shelters, 39 00:04:45,430 --> 00:04:48,610 First, transitional housing, self-sufficient services, 40 00:04:48,950 --> 00:04:53,190 individual group therapy, and comprehensive prevention program. 41 00:04:53,670 --> 00:04:55,190 A closing, again, thank you Mayor. 42 00:04:55,790 --> 00:04:56,750 Thank you City Council members. 43 00:04:57,050 --> 00:05:00,830 We're so grateful for this block of mission in your ongoing support. 44 00:05:01,170 --> 00:05:05,370 On behalf of the Luminati Alliance, part of the directors, staff, volunteers. 45 00:05:05,890 --> 00:05:11,050 We thank you all for taking action this month to create the safe, thriving, and equitable community. 46 00:05:11,730 --> 00:05:12,010 Thank you. 47 00:05:12,010 --> 00:05:13,370 Thank you very much. 48 00:05:16,800 --> 00:05:22,760 We appreciate all that you're doing to help those out there that need your services. Thank you. 49 00:05:24,300 --> 00:05:34,020 The next item is public comment on items that are not on the agenda. I have no speaker slip. Anyone like to address the council on an item not on the agenda? 50 00:05:36,300 --> 00:05:39,520 Seeing none, we'll move on to city management report. Mr. Garcia. 51 00:05:40,220 --> 00:05:46,300 just thank you mayor members of the city council. As you will notice tonight are normal city clerk 52 00:05:46,300 --> 00:05:52,000 Miss interleaders not here she's way at training for our laser fish software that we utilize 53 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:57,980 so Mr. James is filling in in that role today so I'd like to welcome him to my right hand side today. 54 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:05,140 A few updates for the community. First one of us start with acknowledging the unseen heroes in our 55 00:06:05,140 --> 00:06:12,340 community which is our public safety dispatchers. It is dispatcher appreciation week. So Chief Smith and 56 00:06:12,900 --> 00:06:17,880 several members of our community have been going above and beyond to really show appreciation and 57 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:23,340 acknowledgement for our dispatcher. So I'm sure they appreciate all the treats and goodies that 58 00:06:23,340 --> 00:06:28,660 they'll be getting throughout the week. Just a small way for us to appreciate those who take those 59 00:06:28,660 --> 00:06:34,240 calls. Usually they are not calling the police department on their happiest days. It's usually because 60 00:06:34,240 --> 00:06:42,560 something serious has happened, so we appreciate the work they do, often unseen, but a very important part of our public safety family. 61 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:54,580 Did want to also let the city council and the community know that in our public works department, we are participating in the California Streets and Road Assessment Survey. 62 00:06:55,260 --> 00:07:02,140 This is a part of a joint program with the County Engineers Association of California, the League of California Cities. 63 00:07:02,140 --> 00:07:08,720 And this is to help us maintain 85% of all of our roads in California, which are local roads. 64 00:07:09,100 --> 00:07:16,020 So the cost continues to go up, but the normal revenue streams that we have, such as gas tax are not. 65 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:20,600 So our participation in the survey is going to help provide a report card and 66 00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:27,440 suggestion so that we can work collaboratively with the state on how we can maintain our vast transportation infrastructure. 67 00:07:27,440 --> 00:07:36,540 So this really shows the importance of local roads and investment, but as well as the deficiencies that exist within the existing framework. 68 00:07:36,780 --> 00:07:41,160 So Ms. Gaglioni and her team are working to get that filled out. 69 00:07:41,780 --> 00:07:48,480 So if anyone in the community hears about the streets and roads assessment survey, that is what it is. 70 00:07:48,500 --> 00:07:50,340 It is an important part of what we are doing. 71 00:07:50,900 --> 00:07:54,500 It did also want to highlight two upcoming community events that are happening. 72 00:07:55,200 --> 00:08:01,320 This Saturday, April 19th, our beloved extravaganza is happening once again at Dinosaur Caves Park, 73 00:08:01,860 --> 00:08:07,860 so it'll be between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. with the first egg hunt for the smallest of our 74 00:08:07,860 --> 00:08:08,720 Easter bunnies. 75 00:08:09,180 --> 00:08:13,240 We'll begin at approximately 10 a.m., the full schedule is on our website. 76 00:08:13,740 --> 00:08:17,780 We are once again excited to have this event, so a big thank you to our Recreation Department, 77 00:08:17,780 --> 00:08:23,680 public works and our police department for helping to coordinate and get all of these 78 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:28,500 activities as well as the countless amount of volunteers. We could not put on our events 79 00:08:28,500 --> 00:08:35,040 without a strong, strong bench volunteers that we have throughout the community. So really 80 00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:38,600 appreciate everyone getting together so that we can have this amazing community event. 81 00:08:39,220 --> 00:08:46,300 And for our mothers, our beloved Mother's Day concert is scheduled for Sunday, May 11th. 82 00:08:46,300 --> 00:08:49,140 This really starts our concert series. 83 00:08:49,500 --> 00:08:52,580 Again, at Dinosaur Caves Park, that is from 1 to 4 pm. 84 00:08:53,100 --> 00:08:59,620 So if you are looking for a fun way to celebrate Mother's Day at Dino Caves Park, 1 to 4, 85 00:08:59,840 --> 00:09:03,040 you can even tell your mother that you got free tickets. 86 00:09:03,560 --> 00:09:07,720 So we're excited to have this event once again, and that concludes my updates for today. 87 00:09:08,100 --> 00:09:08,640 Any questions? 88 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:16,260 I want to add that Damon Castillo, the seal, sorry, is playing on another stage. 89 00:09:16,260 --> 00:09:17,140 That is correct, yes. 90 00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:18,640 I'm excited about that. 91 00:09:18,940 --> 00:09:19,460 Very good. 92 00:09:20,260 --> 00:09:21,580 Other questions, comments? 93 00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:25,400 Seeing none, we'll move on to City Attorney's Report and any close session. 94 00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:26,600 Thank you, Mr. Mayor. 95 00:09:27,100 --> 00:09:37,820 The City Council did meet and close session under Government Code Section 54956.9 subdivision D1 on a conference of legal counsel on existing litigation in Andrew Crow Family Trust versus the City of Nismo Beach. 96 00:09:37,820 --> 00:09:38,960 there was no reportable action. 97 00:09:39,880 --> 00:09:44,140 Thank you. We'll move on to city council committee reports and committee reports. 98 00:09:47,050 --> 00:09:51,350 I've just got a few fire safe council meeting tomorrow. 99 00:09:52,230 --> 00:09:59,430 There's a couple more grants announced, PG&E's announcement and also the California fire safe council has a grant 100 00:09:59,430 --> 00:10:03,310 help on administrative overhead costs which have been very effective. 101 00:10:03,310 --> 00:10:10,910 And I have a ethical meeting Thursday, and it's mainly a budget and work plan for the coming year. 102 00:10:11,330 --> 00:10:15,790 And it's not too busy right now, but it's going to get pretty busy later on this year. 103 00:10:16,790 --> 00:10:17,910 That's all I have. 104 00:10:18,070 --> 00:10:22,930 We'll now move on to the consent calendar. 105 00:10:23,130 --> 00:10:24,970 I have no speaker slip on consent. 106 00:10:25,170 --> 00:10:30,890 Anyone in the, here in the chambers, wish to comment on any item under consent. 107 00:10:33,920 --> 00:10:37,740 I'll bring it back to Council. Anyone like to fool any items on consent? 108 00:10:37,860 --> 00:10:39,800 The I like to pull item 9-H. 109 00:10:42,900 --> 00:10:47,780 9-H is the thrown ordinance. 110 00:10:48,020 --> 00:10:48,360 That's great. 111 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:50,980 And I would like to pull 9-E, please. 112 00:10:51,460 --> 00:10:56,820 9-E is the encroachment, the rail fence, any others. 113 00:10:58,040 --> 00:11:02,500 And again, both cases the pull for separate discussion, okay. 114 00:11:02,500 --> 00:11:11,240 All right, an entertainer motion to approve the rest of consent minus 9E and 9H. 115 00:11:16,660 --> 00:11:22,580 I make a motion we approve the consent calendar with the exceptions of items 9E and 9H. 116 00:11:22,820 --> 00:11:23,340 It's our second. 117 00:11:24,700 --> 00:11:25,400 Second. 118 00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:28,840 We have Mr. Clerk. 119 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:30,280 We have a motion the second. 120 00:11:30,980 --> 00:11:35,120 Roll call please on consent minus 9E and 9H. 121 00:11:36,560 --> 00:11:37,340 Councilmember Newton? 122 00:11:38,460 --> 00:11:38,580 Yes. 123 00:11:38,860 --> 00:11:39,540 Councilmember Guthrie? 124 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:39,800 Yes. 125 00:11:40,060 --> 00:11:40,780 Councilmember Inman? 126 00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:41,200 Yes. 127 00:11:41,580 --> 00:11:42,220 Mayor Patten-Rese? 128 00:11:42,560 --> 00:11:42,700 Yes. 129 00:11:43,020 --> 00:11:43,460 Mayor Walgay? 130 00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:43,740 Yes. 131 00:11:44,100 --> 00:11:44,640 Motion passes. 132 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:45,540 Okay. 133 00:11:45,540 --> 00:11:47,100 We'll move on to 9-E. 134 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:47,820 Mr. Garcia. 135 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:49,660 Yes. 136 00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:51,480 Thank you, Mayor Rembers of the City Council. 137 00:11:51,860 --> 00:11:57,620 Item 9-E is an encroachment agreement to allow an open rail fence in the city right of way along 138 00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:02,300 the Water Street property frontage at 306-Pierre Avenue. 139 00:12:02,300 --> 00:12:06,720 There is an exhibit to the encroachment agreement itself. 140 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:12,980 If there are specific questions, happy to answer those, also happy to give a presentation. 141 00:12:13,460 --> 00:12:16,000 Our public works director is available as well as our city engineer. 142 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:23,180 Ms. Gaglioli, would you prefer to do a presentation or just answer questions? 143 00:12:26,860 --> 00:12:30,080 I think we just answer questions if that is easier for us. 144 00:12:30,300 --> 00:12:33,900 Yeah, I was looking at the photographs, thank you for those. 145 00:12:33,900 --> 00:12:46,000 and this is, there's a white fence and then there's outcroppings of land with foliage, not foliage, little plants. 146 00:12:46,800 --> 00:13:03,720 And the reason I wanted to separate this is because I know that this is in Shell Beach and there have been other properties where certain residents have been required to change their 147 00:13:04,360 --> 00:13:09,740 footprint, I'll say, due to encroaching on the cities right away. 148 00:13:10,260 --> 00:13:18,660 So I think it's important for the council to see the pictures because before, at least 149 00:13:18,660 --> 00:13:26,260 with one property, which is Mr. Meiner's property, we required a change so that it didn't 150 00:13:26,260 --> 00:13:27,500 go over the city right away. 151 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:31,320 So I'd like everyone to be sure we want to allow this encroachment. 152 00:13:31,320 --> 00:13:36,980 And I wanted to know how long it was, Mr. Eric, which I'm not thinking your last name right now, sorry. 153 00:13:37,960 --> 00:13:39,020 Eldridge, Mr. Eldridge. 154 00:13:40,660 --> 00:13:43,020 Good evening, everyone, Eric Eldridge, City of Pisma. 155 00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:55,880 The case of Mr. Minor was he had a retaining wall that was encroaching in that wasn't allowing additional parking and kind of a view triangle there. 156 00:13:56,600 --> 00:14:08,400 which is a little bit different than the case that's before you today where they've actually done their gutter and their curb improvements and there is a frontage parking and the encroachment, 157 00:14:09,240 --> 00:14:18,700 they have a 50 foot wide right away and so they're encroaching in about 30 inches with their fence, but it's not impeding the parking or those frontage improvements. 158 00:14:19,180 --> 00:14:24,440 So it's a little bit different case with Mr. Minor on that one specifically. 159 00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:31,120 So could we see the picture so you could kind of point out for us how it encroaches there there are two pictures in our package 160 00:14:33,830 --> 00:14:34,910 Sorry, I don't have anything 161 00:14:36,190 --> 00:14:36,630 Can 162 00:14:41,110 --> 00:14:44,590 you describe where the encroachment is sure so 163 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:54,900 Yeah, so at the at the top of the screen where it says water street and then you can see the heavy 164 00:14:55,520 --> 00:14:59,980 Dash broken line. That's the city right away and the city right away is about 165 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,840 50 feet wide. And then you can kind of see then the hatching, the hatch pattern. That's the area. That's the zone of where they encroached with their picket fence or that decorative fence. So they encroached into the city right away about 30 inches there, along there, along water. And then they, they were able to pull back in as it made the curb return and then it went down pure avenue. And then if you go into scroll down and go to the color photo. So you can see the street light there. 166 00:15:29,840 --> 00:15:36,340 in the fence, go down one more. So right there, so that's a good looking line there. So, 167 00:15:37,240 --> 00:15:44,740 so even though they're about five feet back from the face of curb, so from the existing 168 00:15:44,740 --> 00:15:48,920 face of the concrete curb they're about five feet back. Technically they're still 30 inches in 169 00:15:48,920 --> 00:15:56,060 coaching. Okay, I mean it looks very nice and the way the encroachment I'll call resolution 170 00:15:56,720 --> 00:16:02,260 is written, I think, really helps protect the city of Tizmović, but I want everyone 171 00:16:02,260 --> 00:16:05,400 to see it because we made different decisions in the past. 172 00:16:07,230 --> 00:16:10,470 Why just had a quick question since we got this up. 173 00:16:12,090 --> 00:16:17,630 When people are making improvements, don't they do a survey, or was this just a landscape 174 00:16:17,630 --> 00:16:24,530 job that they followed the, you know, maybe the line of that was already existing? 175 00:16:24,530 --> 00:16:34,650 I'm just curious as to how this happened and are we going to look for something or if there was a reason that we could pinpoint are we going to look for? 176 00:16:34,950 --> 00:16:41,050 So they had a full topos survey done. They did frontage improvements. The whole house is new. 177 00:16:42,110 --> 00:16:51,970 They did a landscaping change, which is very common. People do it all the time where when you first go with your landscaping and then by the time you're done they change it. 178 00:16:51,970 --> 00:16:55,110 And in this case, they didn't have that walkway connection. 179 00:16:55,110 --> 00:16:57,450 So where you can see the home here, 180 00:16:57,450 --> 00:16:59,190 and then you can see the paper pathway. 181 00:16:59,870 --> 00:17:02,750 This whole zone was actually just landscaping, 182 00:17:02,890 --> 00:17:03,710 and then they added that, 183 00:17:03,850 --> 00:17:05,770 and then they kind of changed their landscaping palette, 184 00:17:06,050 --> 00:17:08,990 which is really normal, everyone does it. 185 00:17:09,710 --> 00:17:12,690 And then the fencing, when that got laid out, 186 00:17:12,690 --> 00:17:15,810 it just, I can't speak for them because I wasn't there, 187 00:17:15,810 --> 00:17:17,990 but they got moved. 188 00:17:18,390 --> 00:17:21,590 I think the other slight nuance on this one, 189 00:17:21,590 --> 00:17:27,190 And I think why some of the elements changed is originally there was sidewalk that was proposed. 190 00:17:27,590 --> 00:17:37,350 When the original policy was there, there was a sidewalk that was required, then the council subsequently changed its policy that did not require sidewalks. 191 00:17:37,350 --> 00:17:49,050 So then that also threw some of the original landscaping off so then they moved the sidewalk or the walking path there to allow for access into the home. 192 00:17:51,830 --> 00:18:05,610 that the owners in a wheelchair here, and so they had a connection from their driveway where then they would go around on the city sidewalk and go around and then once they didn't have to build the sidewalk anymore on either frontage, then they added one along the house frontage. 193 00:18:07,330 --> 00:18:16,750 So, I don't know how to catch this in the future, but I do know accumulated impacts very 194 00:18:16,750 --> 00:18:21,430 well because I've seen it happen over the last 25 years with traffic, with parking, with 195 00:18:21,430 --> 00:18:22,130 everything else. 196 00:18:22,850 --> 00:18:30,670 So we've got miners who encroached 17 inches, we've got 30 inches here, so I'm just kind of 197 00:18:30,670 --> 00:18:36,850 thinking of, and I, it might not be a big deal now, but as things change along Ocean Boulevard, 198 00:18:37,010 --> 00:18:45,230 another, you know, having a two-way road is going to be very important. So, and I'm 199 00:18:45,230 --> 00:18:49,750 not trying to make a big deal about this, but I do think that, you know, that we should 200 00:18:49,750 --> 00:18:54,710 look at this and think, okay, how can we prevent this from happening in the future? Because it 201 00:18:54,710 --> 00:18:58,930 might not be, it might have to be undone, because you know what I mean, it might have to end up. 202 00:18:58,930 --> 00:19:00,150 So those are great points. 203 00:19:00,450 --> 00:19:04,110 This one, we don't have a picture where if they rotated slightly in the street, 204 00:19:04,350 --> 00:19:06,430 you would see that they actually widen the street here. 205 00:19:06,590 --> 00:19:11,870 So they actually, what I would call curb to curb, it's not fully built on the other side. 206 00:19:11,990 --> 00:19:17,490 But the full street with that the city's seeking, they did that obligation. 207 00:19:18,030 --> 00:19:20,630 So it only came down to the actual concrete sidewalk. 208 00:19:21,870 --> 00:19:27,470 And this one, the whole reason why we're bringing it before you as an encroachment agreement, 209 00:19:27,470 --> 00:19:34,470 Is it is that's a agreement that's recorded against their title that at any future date we can take it back 210 00:19:34,470 --> 00:19:40,910 So we can say hey at their cost or we will charge them they have to remove it and then we can 211 00:19:40,910 --> 00:19:47,750 So this met this is a mechanism where we the city are protected where then we can come back and claim our property 212 00:19:48,730 --> 00:19:53,770 Yeah, I understand that and I understood it when miners, you know when we did that with miners 213 00:19:53,770 --> 00:19:55,470 I would just like to avoid that 214 00:19:55,470 --> 00:20:00,050 But that's kind of my preference, and I don't know if that's even realistic, but that would be my preference. 215 00:20:01,210 --> 00:20:02,090 Any other questions? 216 00:20:02,310 --> 00:20:08,270 Just a comment, you know, when we did improvements or minors, we also didn't force them to go all the way back. 217 00:20:08,830 --> 00:20:13,490 We kind of met somewhere in the middle, because it conformed with the existing homes that were already developed there. 218 00:20:14,050 --> 00:20:20,090 And with this here being a fence, being a non-permanent structure, I don't see the issue with it. 219 00:20:21,390 --> 00:20:26,110 Okay. Any other questions? Let me go out to the public. I haven't spoken to any public 220 00:20:26,110 --> 00:20:32,660 comment on this item. Seeing none, I'll bring it back to Council on the further deliberation. 221 00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:39,440 If not, we have a I believe a resolution. Yes, we have a resolution. 222 00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:45,380 And my comments were not specific to this property because I don't have as much of a problem. 223 00:20:45,600 --> 00:20:50,860 It is properties in the future where the choice is not going to be just accepted. It's going 224 00:20:50,860 --> 00:20:53,800 to be reduced, so I'm just trying to figure out a way to catch it. 225 00:20:54,380 --> 00:20:58,480 I agree. That's why I brought it up. It's the accumulation effect and how that continues 226 00:20:58,480 --> 00:21:01,900 and how we need to watch for these kind of things. 227 00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:06,520 I guess this is actually an accroachment agreement, not a resolution. 228 00:21:07,680 --> 00:21:11,160 I make a motion. We approve item 90. 229 00:21:11,720 --> 00:21:12,260 Is there a second? 230 00:21:13,100 --> 00:21:16,460 I'll second. Mr. Clerk, I have a motion to second. 231 00:21:16,840 --> 00:21:17,640 Roll call please. 232 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:23,260 Councilmember Newton? Yes. Councilmember Inan? Yes. Councilmember Guthrie? Yes. Mayor 233 00:21:23,260 --> 00:21:29,540 Pro Temries? Yes. Mayor Waggy? Yes. Motion passes, 5-0. Okay, we'll move on to the next 234 00:21:29,540 --> 00:21:35,480 pulled item, 9-H, which is the, I'll be forward to it as the drone ordinance. 235 00:21:36,420 --> 00:21:40,920 Sure. I see you. Yes, thank you, Mayor. That's exactly what this item is. This is the second 236 00:21:40,920 --> 00:21:45,680 reading. Following the first reading, we did make the changes as directed by City Council. 237 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:47,940 Those are outlined in the staff report. 238 00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:52,840 We're happy to answer any questions or if the council has any specific request. 239 00:21:55,430 --> 00:21:55,710 Go ahead. 240 00:21:56,530 --> 00:21:57,490 Let's make your point. 241 00:21:57,910 --> 00:21:58,010 Yeah. 242 00:21:58,610 --> 00:22:02,250 So, how did this item come to be on our agenda? 243 00:22:02,390 --> 00:22:05,330 Because I don't recall the council requesting it. 244 00:22:05,390 --> 00:22:08,310 I don't remember the public standards, the issue with drones or anything. 245 00:22:08,790 --> 00:22:10,950 So I'm just, how did this get on our agenda? 246 00:22:13,870 --> 00:22:16,830 There's a couple of reasons it came to the council. 247 00:22:16,830 --> 00:22:27,870 Well, the first and foremost was we had some concerns that for special events that were operated by the city, the drone operator could not legally fly on behalf of the city because of the city's ordinance. 248 00:22:28,470 --> 00:22:34,750 So we did kind of a ground up look at what the city's ordinance said to see if it was impinging on that ability. 249 00:22:35,370 --> 00:22:40,350 In that time frame, we also had a number of people who were actually cited by the police department for it. 250 00:22:40,350 --> 00:22:46,410 One of the cases went to trial and found in favor of the defendant, but on the basis that 251 00:22:46,410 --> 00:22:50,270 there were not enough signs stating that this was prohibited. 252 00:22:50,550 --> 00:22:55,930 So when we looked at kind of a global view of the ordinance, we realized that there were 253 00:22:55,930 --> 00:23:01,450 some potential infirmities in there that we could have an opportunity to tighten up and understand 254 00:23:01,450 --> 00:23:05,030 where the limitations were in our existing ordinance. 255 00:23:05,310 --> 00:23:07,130 And so that's where it came from basically. 256 00:23:07,130 --> 00:23:14,210 Okay, so I mean, if I hear this correctly, so we lost a case in court and this is our correction. 257 00:23:14,890 --> 00:23:32,590 No, that happened in after we were looking at it anyway for our special events because we had some concerns about special events drone operators and they were coming to the city manager for waivers of our existing ordinance as part of the special events process. 258 00:23:32,590 --> 00:23:38,230 That waiver was not explicitly provided for in the ordinance, it's something we were doing administratively. 259 00:23:38,430 --> 00:23:43,430 And so there was a concern that, well, we don't really have the authority to be waiving it, so let's fix our ordinance. 260 00:23:43,850 --> 00:23:51,250 So the city manager can get out of the business of issuing these waivers for our special events, because the drones do benefit our special events. 261 00:23:51,370 --> 00:24:00,670 We've got people that are flying on behalf of the city for either filming the special events or filming for publicity purposes, but they were prohibited under our existing code from doing that. 262 00:24:00,670 --> 00:24:07,790 And so that's what the genesis was the citation that came out of that was during the process of our review of the ordinance 263 00:24:07,790 --> 00:24:12,230 So just provided an additional basis for us to do a revise of the of the ordinance 264 00:24:12,230 --> 00:24:16,910 But it's still expanded from the safety zone to essentially the entire city 265 00:24:17,430 --> 00:24:23,030 Well, the issue was what is our regulation? What is our ability and 266 00:24:23,030 --> 00:24:25,430 There was nothing stated elsewhere 267 00:24:25,430 --> 00:24:43,590 So we wanted to make sure that we were giving clear direction to those who would fly within the community as to where they could and could not because it wasn't clear from the beach safety zone, what you could and could not fly? Where did it exactly prohibit? In other words, could you take off it just said I believe 268 00:24:43,590 --> 00:24:53,690 We have to leave, operate or land within the beach safety zone, and operate runs into that federal preemption issue that we discussed when we're talking about the ordinance. 269 00:24:54,050 --> 00:25:11,550 They can operate in the sky, and we have no control over it, so we looked at, okay, let's designate where they can take off and where they can land, so that it is very clear, so that no one's going to have a concern about when they send a drone up, that they're going to get a citation, whether it's on behalf of the city as part of a special events process, or anywhere else in the city. 270 00:25:11,550 --> 00:25:19,510 Right. And since we can't regulate the sky, we're back to the same old thing that if you are, if you live 251 feet away from a park, 271 00:25:20,170 --> 00:25:26,790 you can fly your drone to the park, but if you live 249 feet, you can't. 272 00:25:27,210 --> 00:25:36,570 Well, it's more where you can take off and land. If you were in Grover Beach and you sent it up from Grover Beach, you could fly the whole city at Pizmo Beach. 273 00:25:36,570 --> 00:25:38,610 It's the FAA preemption. 274 00:25:39,190 --> 00:25:45,910 What we're trying to do is, excuse me, strike a balance between public safety for people 275 00:25:45,910 --> 00:25:50,390 who are operating the drones so that they don't endanger other people while they're operating 276 00:25:50,390 --> 00:25:50,650 them. 277 00:25:50,830 --> 00:25:53,490 And that's kind of the comprehensive strategy. 278 00:25:54,450 --> 00:25:56,930 Council is the decision maker on this. 279 00:25:57,010 --> 00:26:00,710 If you don't want those restrictions, then you can give us direction to come back and just 280 00:26:00,710 --> 00:26:06,670 just remove the reference to drones in the beach safety zone and then it will be anyone 281 00:26:06,670 --> 00:26:12,030 can fly anywhere on but we don't have any restrictions then and if someone gets hurt 282 00:26:12,030 --> 00:26:17,910 by a drone because of improper operation or dangerous operation or someone's privacy 283 00:26:17,910 --> 00:26:22,890 is invaded because someone is hovering over then we don't have those regulations so this 284 00:26:22,890 --> 00:26:27,650 is just a tool that we would use. We would use it sparing like we use most code enforcement 285 00:26:27,650 --> 00:26:32,030 tools but it just provides us the opportunity to regulate where where that can be a problem. 286 00:26:32,430 --> 00:26:36,990 I understand your concerns I mean but I did look and I mean fortunately there's already existing 287 00:26:36,990 --> 00:26:43,230 law that does cover a lot of things like we talked about before regarding firefighting aircraft 288 00:26:44,150 --> 00:26:47,670 e-dropping on people where people expect to have a right to privacy like there's already 289 00:26:47,670 --> 00:26:54,150 state law that covers almost all of that but you know what I want to make sure we don't do is overreach 290 00:26:54,150 --> 00:27:01,110 on this. You know, I understand public safety and it's not a problem. But, you know, fortunately, 291 00:27:02,270 --> 00:27:07,910 you know, if they have so many of these fact sheets that you can open up, right? But the 292 00:27:07,910 --> 00:27:11,970 one that concerned me was is that you may not substantially interfere with the property 293 00:27:11,970 --> 00:27:18,610 owners actually use an enjoyment of the property with the restriction. So if I can't launch 294 00:27:18,610 --> 00:27:23,670 a drone from my house, I think I'm interfering on someone's right to enjoy 295 00:27:25,630 --> 00:27:31,330 I'm not familiar with that portion of the FAA's regulations, but I can certainly look at it. 296 00:27:31,370 --> 00:27:35,710 But ultimately, if the council wants to strip down version of this, we'll take direction 297 00:27:35,710 --> 00:27:40,310 to do that and bring you back something that is, I don't want to see more user-friendly, 298 00:27:40,490 --> 00:27:41,750 but less restrictive. 299 00:27:42,210 --> 00:27:45,190 That covers the highlights that we were looking to do. 300 00:27:45,450 --> 00:27:49,790 But what we were concerned about is just having unregulated drone flights throughout the 301 00:27:49,790 --> 00:27:55,050 the community where they can take off and land anywhere and the one you know that the person got 302 00:27:55,050 --> 00:28:02,010 cited for was taking off from the the peer and that can be a severely impacted area during the 303 00:28:02,010 --> 00:28:06,950 summer so if we don't have those regulations in place we may have people setting off their drones 304 00:28:06,950 --> 00:28:11,170 from the peer without any regulation at all. And do we know if that person was doing it like in an 305 00:28:11,170 --> 00:28:18,730 unsafe manner? I don't know the nature of it to be honest. I just don't know how that came about. 306 00:28:19,350 --> 00:28:23,230 I did want to mention one other thing that came out of that citation. 307 00:28:23,490 --> 00:28:27,710 There was some concern that for that person of the amount of the fine that was imposed 308 00:28:27,710 --> 00:28:33,530 by the court, I looked at the citation itself and the court imposed the wrong fine. 309 00:28:33,710 --> 00:28:37,990 I contacted the court's administrative staff and I said, what are you doing? 310 00:28:38,230 --> 00:28:39,390 Why is that so high? 311 00:28:39,590 --> 00:28:45,310 Our fine for an infraction is $100 and they said, oh, well, in the absence of something on 312 00:28:45,310 --> 00:28:48,450 our bail schedule, we just assume that it's the maximum. 313 00:28:48,450 --> 00:28:56,270 And I said, wrong assumption basically, and so they took care of that and addressed that for the violation of that particular code section. 314 00:28:56,430 --> 00:28:57,970 So hopefully that's resolved at the court. 315 00:28:58,430 --> 00:29:02,190 But we don't see anywhere near that amount of money out of a citation. 316 00:29:02,690 --> 00:29:08,050 If we have $100 fine, I think the last time I looked we get $17 out of that. 317 00:29:08,310 --> 00:29:11,090 It's not a significant portion. The rest of it goes to the court administration. 318 00:29:11,090 --> 00:29:16,370 Okay. And did we send this? I know I looked at the FAA's website on drones and they said if you're 319 00:29:16,370 --> 00:29:20,790 proposing an ordinance of municipality, you can send it in for a preview and comments. 320 00:29:21,010 --> 00:29:26,730 Did not. We can certainly do that if the council would like a second set of eyes on it. I'm not sure 321 00:29:26,730 --> 00:29:33,490 at this point what the status of the FAA's review program is on that. I know that a lot of the FAA's 322 00:29:33,490 --> 00:29:40,750 operations have been curtailed as with many other federal agencies. So I'm not sure how long 323 00:29:40,750 --> 00:29:47,710 that turnaround time would be okay and then our current ordinance we don't allow any launches 324 00:29:47,710 --> 00:29:53,630 from the peers that correct it's no operation or landing I think is what it says currently 325 00:29:53,630 --> 00:29:59,790 doesn't say anything about taking off right so I'm just curious with our commercial events I mean how 326 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:29,600 Are our commercial operators keep line of sight, which is also required, and do the job of promoting the event or the city? Well, there are different regulations once they're in the sky. If they're a part 107 pilot, they have lesser restrictions on the line of sight provision. They can fly over people, they can fly at night, but they have to basically go through very similar training to what a commercial airline pilot has to go through. They're not actually flying an airplane, but they are flying an aircraft. 327 00:30:29,600 --> 00:30:35,500 And so they have to go through the same kind of training, they have to go through the flight school, ground school to get that certification. 328 00:30:35,800 --> 00:30:38,560 They get a little card that shows they've got that part 107. 329 00:30:38,740 --> 00:30:41,980 And so they have fewer restrictions than the hobbyist drone operator. 330 00:30:42,220 --> 00:30:44,720 But they couldn't be a single person operator then. 331 00:30:45,200 --> 00:30:47,200 Because they had to launch their drone from elsewhere. 332 00:30:48,280 --> 00:30:51,800 Beyond the peer to watch the surf and event to bring it over. 333 00:30:52,100 --> 00:30:52,760 Correct. Yeah. 334 00:30:53,560 --> 00:30:57,600 So we're in the end making them have to have staff. 335 00:30:57,600 --> 00:31:03,000 Well, we're not looking to increase the administrative burden on there 336 00:31:03,000 --> 00:31:08,940 We're looking to protect public safety and where there's a balance between public safety and administrative burden 337 00:31:08,940 --> 00:31:12,040 That's going to be a policy decision for the council to make a determination 338 00:31:12,040 --> 00:31:19,040 So if the council wants to make it less burdensome, but potentially have situations where there's an increased risk to the public 339 00:31:19,040 --> 00:31:23,780 That's a policy balancing thing and we'll take direction as to the council about how you'd like to do that 340 00:31:23,780 --> 00:31:31,300 Okay, and then there's one other part in that in the Rose Ordnance, and I understand maybe a little gray area needs to be clarified. 341 00:31:31,760 --> 00:31:37,720 It talks about you have to obtain a city film permit in order to film as a commercial user. 342 00:31:38,580 --> 00:31:48,440 So, when you look at our current rules to get a film permit, you know, it's not a simple process, it's a $1,400 application. 343 00:31:48,440 --> 00:31:55,220 And in here it doesn't say there's going to be a new film permit process, something else like that. 344 00:31:55,920 --> 00:31:57,540 So can you tell me what that would default? 345 00:31:57,620 --> 00:31:59,180 Sure, I'll answer that one. 346 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:05,180 So what we were proposing and anticipating is if the ordinance moved forward tonight, 347 00:32:05,380 --> 00:32:12,400 then we would bring forward a resolution to establish the fee for drone use. 348 00:32:12,800 --> 00:32:16,940 The film permit fee as it currently exists within the municipal code 349 00:32:16,940 --> 00:32:24,040 is really poor film production. When we have TV commercial shoots, TV movies that come in, 350 00:32:25,080 --> 00:32:29,520 most of the time it's on the beach. Other times it's in other locations, but the vast majority 351 00:32:29,520 --> 00:32:33,460 when people want to film commercials, the most recent one that we had a couple years ago was 352 00:32:33,460 --> 00:32:39,860 Rivian. When they were getting ready to launch the Rivians here in the United States, they film 353 00:32:39,860 --> 00:32:47,080 on our beach. That requires a lot of coordination, safety, shutting down areas of the beach, 354 00:32:47,340 --> 00:32:53,800 doing different things to help accommodate that. That level of film production, insurance, 355 00:32:54,120 --> 00:33:01,100 oversight doesn't necessitate the $1,400 fee. And arguably, it's quite low. Several other jurisdictions, 356 00:33:01,100 --> 00:33:07,600 it's in the tens of thousands. But that was the number based on what we could calculate for 357 00:33:07,600 --> 00:33:10,440 or staff time impact to process that. 358 00:33:10,800 --> 00:33:13,720 So we were envisioning a fee, 359 00:33:14,380 --> 00:33:17,420 like a one-time use fee closer to $20, 360 00:33:17,680 --> 00:33:21,140 an annual fee of something like a hundred 361 00:33:22,760 --> 00:33:24,920 for drone type use, 362 00:33:25,560 --> 00:33:26,640 for commercial purposes. 363 00:33:27,340 --> 00:33:30,740 If it was for lack of a better term, 364 00:33:31,160 --> 00:33:34,640 Johnny in the backyard using a hobby drone 365 00:33:35,300 --> 00:33:43,820 to fly over his house, there would not be a fee for that, and that's not a commercial use, so that was what we were anticipating. 366 00:33:44,500 --> 00:33:49,880 Okay, my last question is, in the ordinance, it talks about being the 250 feet from any city property. 367 00:33:50,620 --> 00:33:53,940 I mean, is there an issue since the city does own every road in Pismo? 368 00:33:56,060 --> 00:34:03,060 The intent was the real property where there's actually a specific designation. 369 00:34:04,040 --> 00:34:08,100 We can certainly tighten that up and say that it doesn't apply to roads, that it only applies 370 00:34:08,100 --> 00:34:11,860 to city parcels for which there's an assessor's parcel number of some description. 371 00:34:12,360 --> 00:34:13,140 We can do that. 372 00:34:13,380 --> 00:34:19,280 It's just tightening up the ordinance, but we wanted to bring something forward to you as kind 373 00:34:19,280 --> 00:34:23,900 of a regulatory structure and it's up to you as the council to tell us how much regulatory 374 00:34:24,980 --> 00:34:28,480 structure you want to have. If you don't want to have a regulatory structure, we're 375 00:34:28,480 --> 00:34:32,780 fine with that, too. We're just trying to provide some tools to protect the public safety. 376 00:34:33,120 --> 00:34:37,060 I define the common kind of funny because you can't fly near any parks, buildings, anything 377 00:34:37,060 --> 00:34:43,460 else, and you better know that. But if you're on the pier, we're required to have a sign, which 378 00:34:43,460 --> 00:34:46,240 is what we lost the case on. Well, that's what the judge- 379 00:34:46,240 --> 00:34:50,420 conflict for users. That's what the judge ruled. There was no provision in the municipal 380 00:34:50,420 --> 00:34:54,480 code requiring signage, though. That was the judge requiring that. 381 00:34:55,020 --> 00:35:04,080 So when I looked at a municode under 12, 2,200, it says that for the rules above it, the 382 00:35:04,080 --> 00:35:07,760 Department of Public Works shall be responsible for adequately posting area described in this 383 00:35:07,760 --> 00:35:13,940 chapter, advising the public prohibited activities within these areas. So I assume that's what 384 00:35:13,940 --> 00:35:17,900 So that was put the judge found, but if anybody else 385 00:35:17,900 --> 00:35:20,200 has any questions, I'll say it by comments. 386 00:35:23,210 --> 00:35:28,370 I just want to make the council aware after we discussed it 387 00:35:28,890 --> 00:35:33,890 during the previous meeting, I was informed by the friends 388 00:35:33,890 --> 00:35:36,330 of Price House that they've had several instances where 389 00:35:36,330 --> 00:35:38,890 people are taking off with drones. 390 00:35:38,890 --> 00:35:41,710 They're in the parking lot at the park and then buzzing people 391 00:35:41,710 --> 00:35:48,330 at the park, actively buzzing people, not just flying around recreationally, if you will. 392 00:35:48,570 --> 00:35:56,070 But I think when I learn that, and part of the problem is we discussed earlier the price 393 00:35:56,070 --> 00:35:58,750 of these drones is so cheap, no, almost anyone can get one. 394 00:35:58,890 --> 00:36:05,550 So I think we need some balance here, I'm hearing maybe we went too far, but we also have an issue 395 00:36:05,550 --> 00:36:10,630 where we need to make sure we do protect the public in case we're definitely needed. 396 00:36:10,630 --> 00:36:14,190 I also just wanted to point out I took a look at the signage provisions in the code. 397 00:36:14,270 --> 00:36:18,910 It talks about signage for prohibitions on claiming and the closure of the beach safety 398 00:36:18,910 --> 00:36:19,190 area. 399 00:36:19,450 --> 00:36:22,230 So those are the two provisions that require the signs. 400 00:36:22,850 --> 00:36:23,090 Okay. 401 00:36:23,190 --> 00:36:26,170 Of course, I've said everything basically about it, but we can do all that later. 402 00:36:28,410 --> 00:36:35,410 Well, I got a call from a business person that photographs real estate from the air that's 403 00:36:35,410 --> 00:36:36,170 coming on the market. 404 00:36:36,170 --> 00:36:41,190 And of course, I was confused, you know, you can't. 405 00:36:41,370 --> 00:36:44,190 So the city manager, or maybe it was Scott. 406 00:36:44,390 --> 00:36:48,110 I don't know, he emailed and got the correct information. 407 00:36:48,390 --> 00:36:50,990 I didn't have the heart to tell him, well, if you're over a city street, 408 00:36:51,970 --> 00:36:53,690 there's a chance you might get a ticket. 409 00:36:53,950 --> 00:36:56,410 And I realized, now that's a commercial use. 410 00:36:56,550 --> 00:37:00,350 He's doing it, but he doesn't make a ton of money. 411 00:37:00,690 --> 00:37:04,630 So getting, having to put more regulations in with him, 412 00:37:04,630 --> 00:37:10,410 I was told he didn't need a permit, but it was a commercial use, so I'm a little confused about that. 413 00:37:11,090 --> 00:37:17,970 So for a commercial use, even today, notwithstanding the ordinance as it's proposed, 414 00:37:18,490 --> 00:37:22,950 if you're operating a commercial business within the city, you're required to get a business 415 00:37:22,950 --> 00:37:30,750 license. So that would still be a requirement with or without this ordinance. So they would be 416 00:37:30,750 --> 00:37:34,830 required to at least have a business license because they're transacting business activities 417 00:37:34,830 --> 00:37:35,510 within the city. 418 00:37:37,670 --> 00:37:44,050 If this was approved in its current, that's our regulation, all business activity, all 419 00:37:44,050 --> 00:37:49,330 folks that do business within the city, even photographers that the city utilizes are 420 00:37:49,330 --> 00:37:52,550 required to obtain business license, that's a standard requirement. 421 00:37:55,170 --> 00:38:03,670 So, for the example, real estate photos, would they need to get a filming permit? 422 00:38:04,890 --> 00:38:10,610 The current regulations as it sits, as it's proposed, what we would be proposing is that 423 00:38:10,610 --> 00:38:17,430 there would be an annual fee for that, an application so that the operator has the proper 424 00:38:17,430 --> 00:38:18,990 or FAA license and insurance. 425 00:38:19,570 --> 00:38:23,850 They have that, it's a minor fee of, we have not created it, 426 00:38:23,950 --> 00:38:25,890 we were going to create it. 427 00:38:26,470 --> 00:38:28,450 Hypothetically, let's just say it was $100, 428 00:38:28,730 --> 00:38:30,090 it'd be $100 annual fee. 429 00:38:30,650 --> 00:38:33,650 We did receive an email earlier that proposed, 430 00:38:33,830 --> 00:38:36,790 if there was a business license that that could substitute 431 00:38:36,790 --> 00:38:38,930 for that, we're open to that. 432 00:38:39,070 --> 00:38:42,770 This is not a revenue generation for us, 433 00:38:42,950 --> 00:38:45,170 but any business license, I'm sorry, 434 00:38:45,170 --> 00:38:47,390 or any business does require a business license 435 00:38:47,390 --> 00:38:48,950 that is a requirement in the city. 436 00:38:50,800 --> 00:38:54,500 So, with the mayor's example, 437 00:38:55,500 --> 00:38:57,680 that can be enforced without the ordinance. 438 00:38:58,360 --> 00:39:00,420 Because the rules existing with FAA 439 00:39:00,420 --> 00:39:03,160 says you can't do what the mayor says you do. 440 00:39:03,260 --> 00:39:05,520 So it could be enforced without the ordinance. 441 00:39:08,210 --> 00:39:09,630 You're not allowed to buzz people. 442 00:39:10,390 --> 00:39:10,950 Correct. 443 00:39:11,210 --> 00:39:12,870 It'd be a federal regulation. 444 00:39:13,770 --> 00:39:16,750 It's not something the city would be a city regulation. 445 00:39:17,630 --> 00:39:26,170 So if somebody was launching from a city park with this regulation, it would, you'd be able to enforce it. 446 00:39:26,610 --> 00:39:35,390 But if somebody was launching from their property above price house and buzzing people, we couldn't enforce it. 447 00:39:36,610 --> 00:39:38,390 They would be able to operate it, yes. 448 00:39:38,390 --> 00:39:46,870 Yeah. Okay. So there's a part of me now. I've in 27 years, I've had one drone exposure that I think 449 00:39:47,510 --> 00:39:51,430 probably is a little obnoxious and the more I thought about it, he was probably sitting on the hill 450 00:39:51,430 --> 00:39:59,170 watching us all react. This was about 10 years ago or so. But I I'm feeling like we're over regulating 451 00:39:59,170 --> 00:40:07,490 this. I really am. It's not really a problem. If we want to put a sign on the pier and that says 452 00:40:07,490 --> 00:40:12,610 I just don't think it's going to offer solutions to what we're intending it to do. 453 00:40:12,870 --> 00:40:18,110 If you want to regulate it on the peer, I see that's a highly congested area and 454 00:40:18,110 --> 00:40:23,850 I see it's a more appropriate, but I just, I think we're over regulating the city. 455 00:40:24,130 --> 00:40:28,770 I honestly do fill that way, and I just don't, if it was a chronic problem or 456 00:40:28,770 --> 00:40:34,870 is the problem in the future, then we can address it, but I think what we're doing is just 457 00:40:34,870 --> 00:40:41,330 just making rules that aren't needed and aren't going to be effective in the long run. 458 00:40:41,330 --> 00:40:45,830 If somebody really wanted to launch from their property and buzz people or do something 459 00:40:45,830 --> 00:40:50,590 they're not supposed to do, so I just think it's over-regulating. 460 00:40:51,210 --> 00:40:53,930 And just we should be asking questions at this point. 461 00:40:54,550 --> 00:40:58,010 Any, let me go to the public list, there's more questions at this point. 462 00:40:58,010 --> 00:41:04,370 I have no speaker slip, any public here in the council chambers would like to address this item. 463 00:41:07,560 --> 00:41:08,820 You have three minutes. 464 00:41:17,220 --> 00:41:18,280 I'm a little confused. 465 00:41:19,140 --> 00:41:29,480 No person should launch a land, private property, other than a property owner, the property owned by the city without prior written consent of the property owner. 466 00:41:31,720 --> 00:41:35,460 Who's going to verify that they have the written consent of the property owner? 467 00:41:35,460 --> 00:41:38,280 I mean, are we creating a nightmare for policing? 468 00:41:40,060 --> 00:41:46,740 No person shall launch a land, et cetera, properly owned otherwise controlled by the city unless granted prior permission. 469 00:41:48,520 --> 00:41:52,340 Pursuit to a special event permit, that's the big dollar item. 470 00:41:52,820 --> 00:41:59,440 So any time it's commercial, it's going to the big, especially event permit, there's no other way around it. 471 00:42:02,060 --> 00:42:08,200 No person shall launch your land at UAS within 25 feet of another person except the U.S. 472 00:42:08,260 --> 00:42:10,000 they operate or the operators does it need. 473 00:42:10,860 --> 00:42:13,160 What do you have a large parcel in downtown Pizmo? 474 00:42:14,680 --> 00:42:22,340 It's not 25 feet, it's 12,000 feet and you've got people out there that are using it. 475 00:42:22,960 --> 00:42:24,900 Maybe they're your relatives, maybe they're not. 476 00:42:25,520 --> 00:42:29,320 Do you have to give a permit to yourself to launch? 477 00:42:30,240 --> 00:42:36,780 You own the property, it's large, it's, I have a 12,000 square foot parking lot, and I can't launch from it. 478 00:42:36,860 --> 00:42:40,920 By the way, I don't have the device, but it's a question. 479 00:42:42,660 --> 00:42:48,760 And then no person shall engage in commercial operation within the city without having to change the city business license. 480 00:42:49,460 --> 00:42:53,680 That kind of goes without saying, if it's a business, you have to have a business license. 481 00:42:53,680 --> 00:42:57,800 But I looked at the fees and they're less than $30 to $50. 482 00:42:58,640 --> 00:43:01,960 It's a tax, it's not a money generator. 483 00:43:02,240 --> 00:43:04,920 It's a tax, so you have some recommended, some tracking. 484 00:43:06,440 --> 00:43:07,960 I didn't even got a cup more. 485 00:43:09,970 --> 00:43:14,990 No person should launch her lawn within 250 feet of a school facility with a prior notification, 486 00:43:15,190 --> 00:43:16,890 written authorization from the school officials. 487 00:43:17,410 --> 00:43:18,570 What is a school official? 488 00:43:18,990 --> 00:43:20,410 Who is a school official? 489 00:43:20,810 --> 00:43:21,790 Is it the janitor? 490 00:43:21,790 --> 00:43:27,630 They're officially working for the, or is it the principal, or is it the vice principal? 491 00:43:31,710 --> 00:43:39,430 No person should learn to learn to do it within 250 feet of any city owned property without prior notification written on the position of the city manager. 492 00:43:40,050 --> 00:43:49,770 So on a beautiful day, you're walking around on the pier and all of a sudden you see a gorgeous opportunity to take a picture of the ocean of a sunset. 493 00:43:49,770 --> 00:43:51,870 that you've got to run down this gentleman here 494 00:43:51,870 --> 00:43:53,270 and get him to sign something, 495 00:43:53,530 --> 00:43:55,450 or you have to anticipate it ahead of time. 496 00:43:55,730 --> 00:43:57,430 You don't know whether it's going to be like tomorrow. 497 00:43:58,190 --> 00:43:59,850 So I question that. 498 00:44:00,330 --> 00:44:02,670 I mean, I don't know the answer, but thank you. 499 00:44:04,410 --> 00:44:05,230 Thank you very much. 500 00:44:05,410 --> 00:44:07,150 Any additional public comment on this item? 501 00:44:09,380 --> 00:44:11,300 If you could fill out a speaker slip afterwards 502 00:44:11,300 --> 00:44:15,660 to the blue speaker slip at the end of the chambers. 503 00:44:18,090 --> 00:44:24,690 I am a photographer. I run a real estate photography company. I'm not the one that called 504 00:44:24,690 --> 00:44:30,470 in, but I am one of them. And I saw this through a post on social media that kind of spread 505 00:44:30,470 --> 00:44:37,590 like wildfire and not in a good way. So long story short, I agree with the council members. 506 00:44:37,710 --> 00:44:42,230 I think this is over regulation in general, but that being said, like I understand that there 507 00:44:42,230 --> 00:44:49,850 some jurisdictions that have regulations on this like Malibu or county of LA? I understand 508 00:44:49,850 --> 00:44:54,650 that. I'm not saying that all regulation is bad or anything like that. I'm just saying 509 00:44:54,650 --> 00:44:58,190 I think this is probably a little bit too far as far as how it's currently written. 510 00:44:58,190 --> 00:44:59,870 and some cons 511 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:24,660 Next for at least real estate photographers, we charge maybe like 100, maybe 200 for drone work. So in terms of like real revenue generation for us, and I know you said the permit is mostly for film productions, you're not gonna get 1400 from us. We'd rather launch from Grover and fly over Pizmo within line of sight, all things considered. 512 00:45:26,800 --> 00:45:28,200 Other thing that I wanted to say, 513 00:45:29,360 --> 00:45:36,480 just for information, so the FAA does have, of course, various laws that we have to follow. 514 00:45:36,860 --> 00:45:43,640 As far as beyond visual line of sight and operations over people, there are technically 515 00:45:43,640 --> 00:45:47,540 some drones that are allowed for that and have been approved for that, but they're very 516 00:45:47,540 --> 00:45:52,540 minimal, so I would just encourage you to make sure the person that you're hiring for those 517 00:45:52,540 --> 00:46:00,580 operations has that specific equipment. Because most of us don't. There's certain drones 518 00:46:00,580 --> 00:46:05,120 that are not good, especially in nighttime, I'd say. And if you're going to have these 519 00:46:05,120 --> 00:46:11,580 events at night, yeah, I don't know. I made my point there. Night flight, that's a lot 520 00:46:11,580 --> 00:46:12,720 easier now, thanks to the FAA. 521 00:46:15,560 --> 00:46:17,640 Yeah, as far as the people buzzing, they're going to buzz 522 00:46:17,640 --> 00:46:21,720 no matter what. The way that this is ran is only going to hurt the people that are already 523 00:46:21,720 --> 00:46:28,660 lawfully flying. I trust my guess. Any additional public comment? 524 00:46:30,940 --> 00:46:31,660 Again, if you can feel 525 00:46:31,660 --> 00:46:33,060 as speakers to it, we appreciate it. 526 00:46:37,810 --> 00:46:41,170 In the past 20 years, I've been drawn flying for about 527 00:46:41,170 --> 00:46:48,930 eight. I'm a part of a 2007 commercial license flyer. I completely love your guy's input on that, 528 00:46:51,010 --> 00:46:57,270 as the drone laws are happening and people can get drones anytime. It is tough because 529 00:46:57,450 --> 00:47:04,470 There's the common sense that has to come into the situation where somebody can just put 530 00:47:04,470 --> 00:47:08,350 their drone down and launch it around hundreds of people and they're not thinking. 531 00:47:09,030 --> 00:47:14,870 And when we're taking tests it's being sure that it's a safe thing to do and most people 532 00:47:14,870 --> 00:47:15,390 don't care. 533 00:47:15,930 --> 00:47:20,170 So that's the thing we have to, you know, I think that's the most difficult thing and 534 00:47:20,170 --> 00:47:25,870 you're trying to figure out a way to regulate that is difficult because now you have people 535 00:47:25,870 --> 00:47:30,970 are doing this for a living, commercial work, and then hobbyists that are not following rules and 536 00:47:30,970 --> 00:47:40,850 causing us to be here. So I think if there's a way to, you know, like you said, not overregulate it, 537 00:47:41,210 --> 00:47:49,170 but find a way a middle ground and keeping people that have spent years studying and flying properly 538 00:47:49,170 --> 00:47:53,210 and safely being able to continue business in our area. 539 00:47:54,570 --> 00:48:00,870 Yeah, I think that's one thing, because yeah, I don't want to put a $1,400 tag on my 540 00:48:00,870 --> 00:48:06,990 client's work, because spending 30 days to try to do something is just kind of insane. 541 00:48:07,670 --> 00:48:11,210 So yeah, I can just put that out there and see what happens. 542 00:48:11,970 --> 00:48:12,750 Thank you for your time. 543 00:48:13,210 --> 00:48:13,490 Thank you. 544 00:48:13,590 --> 00:48:14,690 Any additional public comment? 545 00:48:14,690 --> 00:48:15,510 I 546 00:48:30,040 --> 00:48:43,620 just found out about this item on your agenda and I just, I'll be very brief, I'm against $1,400. Seriously, I really would like for you guys to seriously reconsider this. 547 00:48:44,000 --> 00:48:52,960 A lot of the photos that are being done by drones are actually promoting the city of Pismo Beach and you're not paying for them. 548 00:48:52,960 --> 00:49:02,240 You're getting value out of the professional photographers that are working and doing that and you're putting them out of business with this and so I'm absolutely 549 00:49:03,260 --> 00:49:09,160 adamantly against it and I just beg you to reconsider your original idea. Thank you very much. 550 00:49:09,640 --> 00:49:12,080 Thank you and additional public comment on this item. 551 00:49:15,240 --> 00:49:17,880 Steve, now I'll bring it back to council and close public comment. 552 00:49:17,880 --> 00:49:28,560 We had some questions on them had to do with the property owner written consent and that's kind of a 553 00:49:30,580 --> 00:49:35,200 it's written consent is the only way you can prove the property owner gave permission, right? 554 00:49:35,720 --> 00:49:49,440 Yes, and it's one of those enforcement tools that if a police officer sees someone and there is a complaint about a drone going up and down off a piece of property that the police officer has the ability to just ask. 555 00:49:49,440 --> 00:49:51,820 Hey, do you have consent for this? 556 00:49:52,340 --> 00:49:55,560 And saying just the response, yeah, I've got consent. 557 00:49:55,780 --> 00:49:59,840 Doesn't necessarily, and the discussion on there were written consent would. 558 00:50:00,740 --> 00:50:03,980 Mr. Day also was concerned about the 25 foot regulation. 559 00:50:04,460 --> 00:50:10,300 That 25 foot regulation is you can't take off or land within 25 feet of another person. 560 00:50:10,560 --> 00:50:13,640 Has nothing to do with the property itself or the size of the property. 561 00:50:13,780 --> 00:50:18,700 It's just a safety radius from that drone so that it's not going to hit someone on its way up. 562 00:50:20,000 --> 00:50:26,380 There are a couple other issues that Mr. Day had some concerns about the school officials. 563 00:50:27,760 --> 00:50:30,040 The janitor is an extreme example. 564 00:50:30,540 --> 00:50:33,700 It's going to be someone who's got authority to speak on behalf of the school. 565 00:50:34,140 --> 00:50:35,700 That's how we would interpret it. 566 00:50:35,800 --> 00:50:42,080 So if someone is flying within the distance of a school and he says the janitor approved it, 567 00:50:42,760 --> 00:50:46,840 we're going to say, well, that's not someone who has the authority to speak on behalf of the school. 568 00:50:46,840 --> 00:50:51,820 So it's a question of reasonableness in that situation. 569 00:50:52,540 --> 00:50:56,120 Do I see this being used on a regular basis? 570 00:50:56,360 --> 00:51:01,860 No, most of the ordinances that we have in the city, we don't enforce on a regular basis. 571 00:51:02,100 --> 00:51:06,400 They are there as a tool to allow us to both protect the public safety and 572 00:51:06,400 --> 00:51:10,560 to prevent nuisances in the air or otherwise in the city. 573 00:51:11,180 --> 00:51:12,200 It's just a tool. 574 00:51:12,200 --> 00:51:21,360 how about property owner launching a drone from his own property and bringing it back to the own property? 575 00:51:21,660 --> 00:51:24,200 That shouldn't be a problem, that's legal, right? 576 00:51:24,380 --> 00:51:27,400 That's the property owner's ability to do that. 577 00:51:29,740 --> 00:51:35,000 And with respect to SEC Special Events Committee. 578 00:51:36,600 --> 00:51:43,300 The ordinance actually has, there's a comma in there that talks about permission of the city or a special event permit. 579 00:51:43,520 --> 00:51:51,080 So the way it's set up that if someone comes in says, Mr. Garcia, do I have permission to fly from this place? 580 00:51:51,700 --> 00:51:54,180 Mr. Garcia can say, yes, here, signed, we're done. 581 00:51:55,280 --> 00:52:04,260 It was intended to make it easier and more clear rather than what we've been doing, which is having Mr. Garcia sign waivers that there's no authority for 582 00:52:04,260 --> 00:52:08,000 or under the code, we're just making it more explicit 583 00:52:08,000 --> 00:52:09,100 that he has that authority. 584 00:52:09,780 --> 00:52:12,180 So if I think we'll comment later, 585 00:52:12,360 --> 00:52:13,920 they didn't want to bother Mr. Garcia, 586 00:52:13,920 --> 00:52:15,460 but all they have to do is send an email, 587 00:52:15,900 --> 00:52:18,800 and they're going to reply from Mr. Garcia's at the extent of it. 588 00:52:19,160 --> 00:52:22,020 That's the process that we've currently utilized, 589 00:52:22,020 --> 00:52:24,780 and that has been for our special events, 590 00:52:24,980 --> 00:52:28,420 whether city events or the surf competitions, 591 00:52:28,760 --> 00:52:32,260 that's the genesis of where that comment came from. 592 00:52:32,260 --> 00:52:38,940 So what we've been doing is where there's been used for a drone, whether for city purposes, 593 00:52:39,460 --> 00:52:47,920 or the surf competitions use it either to help look for rip currents, help with the event safety planning, 594 00:52:48,120 --> 00:52:54,880 as well as for filming for commercial purposes, we have allowed launching off of the pier. 595 00:52:55,020 --> 00:52:56,340 That's what it's been for. 596 00:52:58,000 --> 00:53:08,300 So that is what was referred to as the city manager, I'm having to track down the city manager and that's been through the special events permit that's gone through our tourism and events department. 597 00:53:08,820 --> 00:53:11,080 They send me an email and I respond. 598 00:53:11,740 --> 00:53:23,740 And there were several comments about the cost of, I guess the question is if your commercial drone operator, what would it take to operate within our city under say the new. 599 00:53:23,740 --> 00:53:29,220 Yeah, so for absolute clarity, we were never proposing for real estate photos or any 600 00:53:29,220 --> 00:53:37,440 other minor commercial use of $1,400 fee, that would be limited only to substantial commercial 601 00:53:37,980 --> 00:53:43,580 activity, such as the Rivian commercial. I think that's a very easy example for people to 602 00:53:43,580 --> 00:53:49,220 understand the extent and the difference between the two. And they actually did use drones in addition 603 00:53:49,220 --> 00:53:55,680 to fix cameras during that operation. So it was a combination of both when they have that event. 604 00:53:57,980 --> 00:54:02,660 It would just be a business license. Again, we were proposing that we would come back and 605 00:54:02,660 --> 00:54:09,340 establish some sort of a fee under $100 for an annual use. And that would coincide with the 606 00:54:09,340 --> 00:54:15,140 annual business license fees. Again, those proposed fees would have come back to the City Council. 607 00:54:15,140 --> 00:54:19,820 We cannot set those fees administratively, the council has to approve those fees. 608 00:54:20,260 --> 00:54:43,640 And so the issue was, I think you kind of asked the question about if you have a prop to answer Councilmember Guthrie's question or comment, if you have a real estate someone doing drone use for real estate purposes, which is very common, if they launch from the property and land on the property, what would they have to do? 609 00:54:43,640 --> 00:54:51,260 They just need to have a business license and if the ordinance moved forward in some form, 610 00:54:51,260 --> 00:54:58,000 but as it's currently written, they would need to have some type of an annual permit fee 611 00:54:58,000 --> 00:55:00,480 or day use fee. 612 00:55:01,640 --> 00:55:07,380 We wouldn't envision having both a one-time fee because some photographers may only come 613 00:55:07,380 --> 00:55:12,760 one time and only do one project in Pismo Beach, but you may have other photographers who do 614 00:55:12,760 --> 00:55:19,440 a lot of work in the city. So to simplify it, just like we have day peddler permits for 615 00:55:19,440 --> 00:55:23,780 a business license activity, we also have annual business license fees. So we would use the same 616 00:55:23,780 --> 00:55:31,920 model. So we would envision a small, minor fee for a day use or weekend use, for example, and then an 617 00:55:31,920 --> 00:55:39,860 annual fee, both to be a nominal amount. Okay. I think that was all the questions. Mayor Proton? 618 00:55:40,500 --> 00:56:02,340 We had correspondence come in and I think that's a person that's in the business and they may be covered entirely on this and I don't know that for sure but would you address the things that were in there so yeah, so I believe if it hasn't already it will be included in the court and 619 00:56:02,340 --> 00:56:08,220 respondents that was provided to the City Council and it was related specifically to 620 00:56:08,220 --> 00:56:14,700 the operations and not wanting to have to get special dispensation every single time. 621 00:56:14,940 --> 00:56:21,760 So the way I read the email and we certainly can follow up with the center of the email 622 00:56:22,780 --> 00:56:28,820 is that they would be in support of having some type of an annual permit so that this does 623 00:56:28,820 --> 00:56:34,020 It does not have to happen every single time, it can just have a single permit that allows them to operate. 624 00:56:35,060 --> 00:56:42,800 So I think it's a good point which is why we were proposing both a single use versus an annual permit would be the proposal. 625 00:56:44,060 --> 00:56:49,320 However, as Mr. Feliceman mentioned, this is up to the City Council. 626 00:56:49,640 --> 00:56:57,200 If the Council would like to have no regulation, some modification, or set priorities, and then we can always come back. 627 00:56:57,200 --> 00:57:00,920 any substantive changes would have to come back for a first reading anyway. 628 00:57:03,040 --> 00:57:06,040 So whatever direction the council would like to give us, 629 00:57:06,060 --> 00:57:08,460 whether to move forward with the ordinance as proposed, 630 00:57:09,180 --> 00:57:12,180 to make modifications, specific modifications, 631 00:57:12,180 --> 00:57:14,300 or to give us broad policy statements, 632 00:57:14,720 --> 00:57:17,000 and then staff can coordinate, 633 00:57:18,160 --> 00:57:21,400 address them, and then bring that back for a first reading at a subsequent meeting. 634 00:57:21,400 --> 00:57:30,120 I guess then my next question would be, is, how do you inform people that have drones? 635 00:57:31,600 --> 00:57:34,180 How are they aware that there's a regulation there? 636 00:57:36,570 --> 00:57:43,230 Well, one of the ways, excuse me, one of the ways is you see them very frequently in national 637 00:57:43,230 --> 00:57:48,130 parks, no drone zone, and it's just a picture of a drone, and it says no drone zone, and 638 00:57:48,130 --> 00:57:53,310 that puts people on notice that there is a restriction of drones in a particular area. 639 00:57:55,090 --> 00:58:00,030 One of the things that we have discovered from a code enforcement standpoint is there's 640 00:58:00,030 --> 00:58:03,710 a lot of signs in the city and not everyone will pay attention to the signs. 641 00:58:04,370 --> 00:58:07,030 And I did want to point out Council Member Newton is correct. 642 00:58:07,230 --> 00:58:11,450 I found the section that he was referring to about public court staff putting out signs. 643 00:58:11,750 --> 00:58:13,870 But if you go down to the pier, there's a lot of signs. 644 00:58:13,870 --> 00:58:19,130 There are signs on the pier that say no dogs, and we still cite people for taking dogs on the pier. 645 00:58:19,770 --> 00:58:25,770 So it's a question of the cost-benefit analysis of where do you put the signs that will have the most impact? 646 00:58:25,970 --> 00:58:28,230 Where is the issue the most acute? 647 00:58:28,890 --> 00:58:38,530 And so putting a sign that says no drone zone at the pier is probably going to inform people that you shouldn't be flying there without some kind of look into what the regulations are. 648 00:58:38,690 --> 00:58:43,350 But where additional signs are placed, you may put them in parks, you may put them near schools. 649 00:58:46,490 --> 00:58:49,390 It's up to the council how extensive you want to make that. 650 00:58:53,400 --> 00:58:59,300 But again, just by two cents worth, I certainly don't want to go overboard on drone regulation, 651 00:58:59,540 --> 00:59:05,480 but we need also public safety and for having people, at least in the instance of Price 652 00:59:05,480 --> 00:59:13,520 Historic Park, where some of the volunteers that are every day, and we're reporting that frequently 653 00:59:13,520 --> 00:59:30,820 Currently there is the droning, the drones coming in and buzzing people and they take off from the parking lot there at the park and they may not be aware they can take off from a private property of their own private property area, but I think that's unlikely. 654 00:59:30,820 --> 00:59:50,760 I think the key thing is, it's a public safety issue and I think we need some kind of a means to regulate that portion without being onerous for those that are legitimate users that have a, especially if they have an FA license to operate with the advanced features that are required by the FA. 655 00:59:50,760 --> 00:59:55,160 I was reading some of the regulations too in the FA and they cover all kinds of things but 656 00:59:55,980 --> 00:59:58,840 It's some would be impossible to bring in the FA to 657 00:59:59,400 --> 00:59:59,840 regular 658 01:00:07,280 --> 01:00:26,180 I think we're limited and that's why the regulations are kind of quirky because we can only regulate where they take off from or where they land. So it's because of federal preemption. So where do you want to go from here? 659 01:00:27,280 --> 01:00:34,040 I'll just say is, you know, if it has a nice little handbook, no drone zone, drone response 660 01:00:34,040 --> 01:00:39,680 playbook for public safety, but this is for police departments and almost every rule 661 01:00:39,680 --> 01:00:43,480 we're talking about when it deals with public safety is poured in here. 662 01:00:44,080 --> 01:00:51,400 So I have no problem with regulating them for safety issues, but that's about the end of 663 01:00:51,400 --> 01:00:51,500 it. 664 01:00:51,500 --> 01:00:56,520 You know, I mean, we talked about can Mr. Day operate a drone out of this parking lot? 665 01:00:56,540 --> 01:01:00,620 Actually, you can't because he's within 250 feet of the police sub-station downtown. 666 01:01:01,440 --> 01:01:07,940 There's no way anyone could be expected to know where they can and cannot fly him. 667 01:01:08,460 --> 01:01:15,420 All, in my opinion, all we need is reasonable restrictions that kind of allow us to do local enforcement 668 01:01:15,920 --> 01:01:18,600 for what's already on the books at a federal or state level. 669 01:01:18,600 --> 01:01:21,000 which would cover exactly what you're talking about. 670 01:01:21,480 --> 01:01:24,380 You can't on a federal level, you can't go buzz people. 671 01:01:25,360 --> 01:01:29,140 And so if I had my way, the commercial users, 672 01:01:29,660 --> 01:01:32,120 they get a business permit, that's their, 673 01:01:32,480 --> 01:01:33,900 that's their, maybe they have a little thing, 674 01:01:34,020 --> 01:01:35,900 they fill out extra, they put their information, 675 01:01:36,260 --> 01:01:37,940 but that's their license, the user drone. 676 01:01:38,520 --> 01:01:40,660 You know, they're already our professionals, 677 01:01:41,020 --> 01:01:42,240 and we need to treat them as so. 678 01:01:43,580 --> 01:01:44,780 And just for clarification, 679 01:01:44,780 --> 01:01:46,740 they're the ones that have FAA license. 680 01:01:47,080 --> 01:01:47,620 That is correct. 681 01:01:47,620 --> 01:01:53,680 Basically the same as you find an aircraft and the most to lose because if they get caught they'll lose it right? 682 01:01:53,740 --> 01:01:57,980 Yeah, for them find with that and I mean they should be my opinion a lot to use them on the pier 683 01:01:58,740 --> 01:02:01,580 They are professionals. They're not gonna land if there's people everywhere 684 01:02:01,580 --> 01:02:06,040 They don't want to lose that right and the ones person to spoke to that, you know 685 01:02:06,040 --> 01:02:09,860 We do gain from the city's promotion from all these videos 686 01:02:10,620 --> 01:02:13,800 All those go away overnight. Yes, but they don't go away. They just go some other beach 687 01:02:14,660 --> 01:02:16,940 So we're getting free publicity out of these 688 01:02:17,940 --> 01:02:27,020 So to me that doesn't make sense and the only person is going to be hurt I mean our public speaker said it correctly the bad actors are going to remain the bad actors. 689 01:02:27,340 --> 01:02:34,400 We're going to hurt the people that actually follow the law which will mean none of our commercial users are going to be taking footage off the beaches. 690 01:02:35,140 --> 01:02:41,540 And I definitely don't think if we're going to regulate anything, it's maybe the peer but it's not all of our parks not all of our properties. 691 01:02:41,540 --> 01:02:51,160 I think that's just way overreaching and at the peer, I mean the most strict I could get is maybe allowing commercial users and the rest would have to have some type of permit. 692 01:02:52,220 --> 01:02:54,080 But even that might be pushing it for me. 693 01:02:54,880 --> 01:02:59,340 To me, if you can cite people for operating in an unsafe manner, that's the enforcement. 694 01:03:00,820 --> 01:03:08,640 Well, I think I heard you say your suggestion we can enforce federal law and we can't. 695 01:03:08,740 --> 01:03:11,680 No, no, we can duplicate it in our municipal law. 696 01:03:12,020 --> 01:03:14,780 But we can't, it's federal preemption once they leave the ground. 697 01:03:16,440 --> 01:03:22,760 Well, because we can't enforce, it becomes an aircraft according to the FAA and we have no regulations. 698 01:03:22,760 --> 01:03:46,380 But the FAA is allowing cities to put regulations in place, and you can look, there's about 14 other cities I want to guess that have restrictions in place that talk about the unsafe use such as buzzing people can or if you're with aircraft, it just allows us to enforce that locally and not have to call the FAA, which I agree, they're not going to do any enforcement, right? 699 01:03:46,380 --> 01:03:50,780 But I mean almost everything in ours is already in there. 700 01:03:50,880 --> 01:03:53,320 We can duplicate their language and keep it at a much higher level. 701 01:03:53,700 --> 01:03:56,080 And actually get the people that we're most worried about. 702 01:03:57,600 --> 01:03:59,640 And then I'm going to look for direction. 703 01:03:59,700 --> 01:04:03,520 If that's the case, if we can enforce federal law, and I didn't think. 704 01:04:03,900 --> 01:04:05,480 We can recreate it on a city level. 705 01:04:05,560 --> 01:04:10,200 Well, even I guess I'd like to get some clarification here. 706 01:04:10,480 --> 01:04:13,120 We can regulate on the ground. 707 01:04:13,480 --> 01:04:15,140 We can't regulate once it's in the air. 708 01:04:15,140 --> 01:04:19,740 So if someone is operating it in the air recklessly, that's an FAA issue. 709 01:04:19,960 --> 01:04:26,900 If they are endangering people on the ground by taking off or landing, we can regulate that portion of it. 710 01:04:27,240 --> 01:04:29,780 So it's that kind of tenuous balance. 711 01:04:30,020 --> 01:04:32,920 Now, the FAA does occasionally go after people. 712 01:04:32,920 --> 01:04:36,480 There's a drone pilot in Philadelphia that got hit for $180,000. 713 01:04:36,980 --> 01:04:40,220 There was a guy in Las Vegas who was filming the strip. 714 01:04:40,660 --> 01:04:43,600 He got hit for $15,000 on one violation. 715 01:04:45,020 --> 01:05:12,380 Yeah, so it does happen, it's out there, but that's in the air, so what we're looking at is just trying to place restrictions for safety purposes and business regulation to make sure that we are getting the good actors, the ones that have the part 107 so that we have that and if we, if the council's direction is to strip it down, we can strip it down, I can bring it back where it's just commercial operators on the peer and obby operators on the peer with permission from the city. 716 01:05:12,900 --> 01:05:17,920 The annual license fee for commercial purposes is incorporated within the city business license. 717 01:05:18,100 --> 01:05:21,360 No additional regulation is required of that. 718 01:05:21,620 --> 01:05:23,780 That is policy direction that we can bring back to you. 719 01:05:24,380 --> 01:05:32,160 Just clarification, does this pamphlet say that cities can regulate once in the air? 720 01:05:32,380 --> 01:05:39,760 On the FAA's website, they list all the California laws that have been put in place and city laws have been put in place. 721 01:05:40,220 --> 01:05:44,580 And they talk about, you cannot operate them in a nuisance manner. 722 01:05:45,580 --> 01:05:47,160 Yeah, I read through it. 723 01:05:47,280 --> 01:05:48,460 Yes, you can't buzz people. 724 01:05:48,640 --> 01:05:50,900 And if you reflect over people, there's a lot of issues. 725 01:05:50,900 --> 01:05:52,440 But you know, we do put that rule in place. 726 01:05:52,700 --> 01:05:56,140 Just as, or see a attorney said, you can't force it. 727 01:05:57,100 --> 01:06:01,160 Well, but that's where I, I think we need something that, again, 728 01:06:01,260 --> 01:06:02,440 I'm not sure that we can. 729 01:06:02,820 --> 01:06:04,300 Limiting the takeoff and landing. 730 01:06:04,780 --> 01:06:06,680 Kind of predict where people are going to use these. 731 01:06:07,440 --> 01:06:08,540 We're chasing a flight. 732 01:06:08,540 --> 01:06:12,760 But we still, I don't want people at the park, 733 01:06:12,940 --> 01:06:14,640 at the price park, I know it's happening, 734 01:06:14,880 --> 01:06:15,760 I'm not sure where else. 735 01:06:16,280 --> 01:06:17,560 Nobody wants it to happen. 736 01:06:18,120 --> 01:06:21,560 But right now, we can't, if we don't have any regulations, 737 01:06:21,840 --> 01:06:24,560 we can't do anything, I'm not sure that we, 738 01:06:25,320 --> 01:06:28,840 you're suggesting that we can somehow regulate 739 01:06:28,840 --> 01:06:29,940 once they take off. 740 01:06:30,520 --> 01:06:32,720 I'm saying, the very least, let's look at how 741 01:06:32,720 --> 01:06:36,600 it's been done elsewhere before we go overly broad 742 01:06:37,060 --> 01:06:40,380 I'm fine, we're looking at how it's been done elsewhere to see what- 743 01:06:40,380 --> 01:06:45,200 Probably the best thing, honestly, is to get staff some direction and table it and have them come back. 744 01:06:46,560 --> 01:06:49,440 Yeah, I don't think we're ready to sign off anything tonight. 745 01:06:49,440 --> 01:06:56,520 I want to make sure we get some clarity in the direction that if we can regulate once they take off, 746 01:06:56,520 --> 01:06:58,300 which I don't think we can, that'd be great. 747 01:06:58,720 --> 01:07:01,240 But lacking that, what can we do? 748 01:07:01,480 --> 01:07:04,500 And if there's examples, I think you mentioned some of the Californians. 749 01:07:04,500 --> 01:07:09,980 And if he does have, like I said, they have an email just set up for questions regarding local laws. 750 01:07:12,640 --> 01:07:17,180 But I'm looking at protecting our residents and our parks, in this particular case, or elsewhere, 751 01:07:17,360 --> 01:07:24,820 where whatever reason they're out there doing this, and I'd like to make sure we can enforce it. 752 01:07:25,020 --> 01:07:33,100 And I think where I am is I'd like to see the staff look further and see what other cities have done, 753 01:07:33,100 --> 01:07:35,520 and where there's an effect of enforcement mechanism 754 01:07:36,000 --> 01:07:38,940 for the problem areas, but that sound like 755 01:07:38,940 --> 01:07:40,720 it's the council, like you're the right council. 756 01:07:40,720 --> 01:07:44,200 I'll just say at some point, people have to have common sense. 757 01:07:45,400 --> 01:07:46,840 I mean, I'll tell you, the biggest hazard 758 01:07:46,840 --> 01:07:49,340 I see on our beaches right now is easy ups. 759 01:07:49,760 --> 01:07:51,640 The wind blows, they hit people, they're dangerous. 760 01:07:52,040 --> 01:07:52,460 But guess what? 761 01:07:52,740 --> 01:07:57,080 I'm not banning them because I like to have the council 762 01:07:57,080 --> 01:07:58,060 on this issue, go ahead. 763 01:07:58,580 --> 01:08:01,820 Well, I think I heard the city attorney say 764 01:08:01,820 --> 01:08:08,920 that he could bring something back that was less onerous as this is and accomplish the same 765 01:08:08,920 --> 01:08:16,900 thing so that we can enforce rules so that we don't get hit with a bunch of stuff and maybe this 766 01:08:16,900 --> 01:08:23,820 is too much and this is what the objection is. So I would say let's table it and have the attorney 767 01:08:23,820 --> 01:08:28,960 come back. What I was trying to do is shoot for the stars land on the moon with an acceptable regulation 768 01:08:28,960 --> 01:08:35,800 for the council. I looked at pretty much every other city that has drone ordinances in place 769 01:08:35,800 --> 01:08:41,060 and tried to bring from those cities what they did in their ordinances and put it into this 770 01:08:41,060 --> 01:08:46,300 ordinance. So it sounds to me like the council wishes to step back from that, make it a more 771 01:08:46,300 --> 01:08:51,420 streamlined user friendly. That's great policy direction. I can do that and we can bring that back 772 01:08:51,420 --> 01:08:58,240 in some point in the future. And if we, it doesn't sound like most of the council want to do this, 773 01:08:58,240 --> 01:09:08,780 But if we are still going to have some kind of limitation near all city property, there needs to be exclusion for city streets, some kind of language, specifically dealing with that. 774 01:09:09,060 --> 01:09:12,140 What I'm hearing is the council's most interested in the peer area. 775 01:09:12,380 --> 01:09:15,340 So, if I'm bringing back an ordinance, that's what I'm going to focus on. 776 01:09:15,440 --> 01:09:20,980 If the council thinks there are other areas of town that are deserving of regulation, we can put that in. 777 01:09:21,160 --> 01:09:22,920 But I'm hearing the peer area. 778 01:09:22,920 --> 01:09:43,760 Yeah, I think price how I guess I think parks and parks, but yeah, I want to make sure we can protect people in parks and I don't and I think the amount of the fee where the operator should be within the business license. I agree with that. 779 01:09:46,320 --> 01:09:49,660 Okay, do you think we should regulate the parks to them? 780 01:09:52,840 --> 01:09:54,220 I'm trying to get some direction. 781 01:09:54,780 --> 01:09:57,040 There was certainly, there was some peer issues. 782 01:09:57,300 --> 01:10:04,700 But you know, it's a public park, there's people in it, if they're doing it safely. 783 01:10:05,180 --> 01:10:14,240 I don't know how much it would be regulated anyway, but I guess I'm looking for a suggestion. 784 01:10:14,940 --> 01:10:17,020 Looking for a suggestion that- 785 01:10:17,020 --> 01:10:21,420 If you have a hobbyist drone operator and they're flying over a park and there's people under that, 786 01:10:21,560 --> 01:10:25,280 they're in violation of federal law because they're endangering the public by doing that. 787 01:10:25,560 --> 01:10:33,940 So that's the concern, do you want to prohibit that and not give them the opportunity to take off and land from the park to prevent that? 788 01:10:34,700 --> 01:10:43,560 Yes, the good actors are going to do it correctly, but we don't draft our municipal code to regulate the good actors. 789 01:10:43,560 --> 01:10:49,400 We draft those to take care of those outlier situations that constitute a hazard for the community. 790 01:10:55,190 --> 01:11:01,250 I guess one solution is to bring back an option for the parks and see what it looks like. 791 01:11:01,910 --> 01:11:03,090 Is that work okay? 792 01:11:05,510 --> 01:11:10,530 The only park that I support is the peer on a limited basis. 793 01:11:10,850 --> 01:11:14,290 I just don't think, I think we're regulating a non-problem. 794 01:11:18,290 --> 01:11:19,150 I would disagree. 795 01:11:19,550 --> 01:11:19,730 Okay. 796 01:11:19,730 --> 01:11:24,190 And I'll tell you, I'd be one of the ones violating the rule if we put it in for all parks. 797 01:11:24,530 --> 01:11:29,670 I take my Thanksgiving family photo every year with a drone because it's wide angle. 798 01:11:30,010 --> 01:11:34,450 We go to memory park and guess what, you can get all of this because they can just sit there. 799 01:11:35,210 --> 01:11:38,830 But now all of a sudden, I'd be violating the ordinance. 800 01:11:39,830 --> 01:11:43,270 So does the drone take off from the park and land? 801 01:11:43,270 --> 01:11:50,030 And about five feet in front of me goes up about six or eight feet, look on your phone, 802 01:11:50,270 --> 01:11:53,970 make sure you like the picture of your family, put your phone to your side, push the button 803 01:11:53,970 --> 01:11:54,630 and it takes the picture. 804 01:11:55,950 --> 01:11:56,690 No one dies. 805 01:11:57,230 --> 01:11:57,630 It's amazing. 806 01:11:58,250 --> 01:11:58,690 No, 807 01:12:02,820 --> 01:12:05,900 it's possible to get someone else to take a picture too, but that's beside the point. 808 01:12:06,500 --> 01:12:06,760 Okay. 809 01:12:07,560 --> 01:12:10,980 I would recommend bringing back an option with the parks, I think. 810 01:12:14,180 --> 01:12:17,900 Parks, use of drones and parks can be a problem. 811 01:12:22,730 --> 01:12:27,530 We haven't voted on it yet, I think you can bring both, you can bring one with a subset 812 01:12:27,530 --> 01:12:32,450 about parks and one without it, and then the majority can disillusion. 813 01:12:32,710 --> 01:12:35,710 I hear council direction to give you a menu of options. 814 01:12:36,330 --> 01:12:36,450 Okay. 815 01:12:36,990 --> 01:12:37,970 I'm going to do that. 816 01:12:38,090 --> 01:12:40,630 I hear you loud and clear that what the direction is. 817 01:12:40,630 --> 01:12:44,470 I think we've given you a direction that we don't think we need a motion, do we? 818 01:12:44,710 --> 01:12:45,870 I just have a quick question. 819 01:12:47,890 --> 01:12:54,490 So, in the meantime, if somebody, no, I really want to clarify this. 820 01:12:54,610 --> 01:13:00,550 In the meantime, if somebody wanted to film the beach, film their, you know, some surfing 821 01:13:00,550 --> 01:13:06,350 competition, that 1,400 is not even going to be considered, right? 822 01:13:06,450 --> 01:13:08,530 It's a business license with a drone. 823 01:13:08,530 --> 01:13:14,690 As long as they have a business license for commercial purposes. 824 01:13:15,710 --> 01:13:23,930 We have not the last time I remember us charging a film permit fee was for the Rivian commercial. 825 01:13:24,550 --> 01:13:36,090 We do not require that for our normal operations, for anyone who is doing commercial, filming, for real estate, calendars. 826 01:13:36,090 --> 01:13:39,530 What's the permission for you, the waiver? 827 01:13:40,630 --> 01:13:42,350 For launching off of the peer. 828 01:13:42,890 --> 01:13:43,290 Okay. 829 01:13:43,930 --> 01:13:50,410 Because right now it is prohibited as a part of the beach safety zone. 830 01:13:56,620 --> 01:13:58,340 And that's part of the concern. 831 01:13:58,640 --> 01:14:02,320 So I'm not going to go out and put signage until we figure out what the council would like 832 01:14:02,320 --> 01:14:02,740 to do. 833 01:14:06,270 --> 01:14:12,510 So yeah, if we had a special event tomorrow that required drone use. 834 01:14:12,510 --> 01:14:18,450 I would continue the practice of having that so that we could continue to allow it if there was a purpose. 835 01:14:18,630 --> 01:14:30,910 Now, if someone just wanted to go fly a drone on the beach for fun, we're not going after that. 836 01:14:34,910 --> 01:14:41,170 There's only a certain amount of beach you can regulate though, I think, if I'm not mistaken because I can't get trash cans out. 837 01:14:41,170 --> 01:14:43,890 to a certain point that he said it was state parks. 838 01:14:45,410 --> 01:14:47,090 For the most part, we put the trash cans out. 839 01:14:47,250 --> 01:14:49,470 It's usually tied, specific. 840 01:14:49,870 --> 01:14:49,930 Yeah. 841 01:14:50,410 --> 01:14:51,250 Okay, we're going to move on. 842 01:14:51,310 --> 01:14:52,850 We have a public carrying item. 843 01:14:53,850 --> 01:14:54,950 Mr. Garcia, 11-A. 844 01:14:56,470 --> 01:14:57,330 Yes, thank you, Mayor. 845 01:14:57,610 --> 01:14:59,970 Item 11-A is levying the 2%. 846 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:13,260 Annual assessment for the PISMO beach lodging, business improvement district, otherwise known as LBID. For fiscal year, 2026, and that is July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026, Ms. Fieser will give this report. 847 01:15:39,820 --> 01:15:49,600 So on April 1st, 2025, the Council of City Council adopted Resolution R205-014, that did 848 01:15:49,600 --> 01:15:50,240 three things. 849 01:15:50,340 --> 01:15:56,800 It approved the CBB and ELBID Advisory Board's Annual Report and Business Plan for Fiscal 850 01:15:56,800 --> 01:16:02,460 Year 2026, declared the Council's intention to levy an annual assessment of 2% of gross 851 01:16:02,460 --> 01:16:08,380 lodging revenues for transient rentals in the district for 2026 and also set up public 852 01:16:08,380 --> 01:16:14,300 hearing for today to consider loving the assessment. This 2% assessment is the same level 853 01:16:14,300 --> 01:16:19,180 of assessment from the previous year. The resolution of intention and the company annual 854 01:16:19,180 --> 01:16:26,740 and report and business plan for 2026 was published in the new times on April 3, 2025 and 855 01:16:26,740 --> 01:16:29,920 mail to all lodging properties within the city on April 4th. 856 01:16:30,140 --> 01:16:34,080 The fiscal impact of the resolution if approved could generate 2% 857 01:16:34,080 --> 01:16:39,440 elbit annual assessments for fiscal year 2026 for approximately $2.7 million, 858 01:16:40,180 --> 01:16:42,540 which could be used to promote the lodging business and 859 01:16:42,540 --> 01:16:46,100 PISMO beach and support physical improvements that are designed to improve 860 01:16:46,100 --> 01:16:53,700 lodging occupancies, revenue, rev par, and TOT taxes, which benefit all the residents of PISMO beach. 861 01:16:54,260 --> 01:16:59,500 As a reminder, the LVID-1% is remarketing of lodging properties in the city, Pismo Beach, 862 01:16:59,740 --> 01:17:04,000 and the other 1% is for visitor-serving improvements, such as the AdiStoot bathroom and improvements, 863 01:17:04,300 --> 01:17:08,820 Christmas decorations, annual beautification, public art contribution, butterfly grove, 864 01:17:08,900 --> 01:17:13,960 trails, signage and cross-locked beach cleaning equipment, a surf rake, the downtown strategic 865 01:17:13,960 --> 01:17:16,040 plant update, and the lighting of ball fields. 866 01:17:17,020 --> 01:17:19,520 And of course, some of those projects could be multi-year. 867 01:17:20,360 --> 01:17:24,280 The primary purpose of this agenda is to hold a public hearing to hear all interested 868 01:17:24,280 --> 01:17:26,020 persons and receive any protests. 869 01:17:26,820 --> 01:17:29,960 At this point, we have not received any protests. 870 01:17:30,660 --> 01:17:35,020 After the public hearing, the council may consider adoption of the resolution, levying the 871 01:17:35,020 --> 01:17:37,340 Elbit Assessment for fiscal year 2026. 872 01:17:37,900 --> 01:17:38,960 That concludes my presentation. 873 01:17:39,920 --> 01:17:40,440 Any questions? 874 01:17:42,120 --> 01:17:43,880 Seeing none, I'll open the public hearing. 875 01:17:45,100 --> 01:17:48,780 What do we like to address the council on this public hearing issue of the 876 01:17:48,780 --> 01:17:49,600 Elbit assessment? 877 01:17:52,890 --> 01:17:56,830 Saying none, I'll close the public hearing. Bring it back to 878 01:17:56,830 --> 01:18:01,490 council. We have a resolution. This is any other discussion. 879 01:18:02,810 --> 01:18:08,270 No, they've been wonderful to us. So let's approve this. I'll move to. I'll move to 880 01:18:08,270 --> 01:18:13,310 Levy, the 2% annual assessment for the PISMA Beach Lodging Business Improvement 881 01:18:13,310 --> 01:18:19,870 District for fiscal year 2026, which is July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. 882 01:18:20,250 --> 01:18:23,790 Basic staff recommendation, resolution reads slightly differently, but yes. 883 01:18:25,410 --> 01:18:26,350 Is there a second? 884 01:18:27,170 --> 01:18:27,510 Second. 885 01:18:28,990 --> 01:18:31,030 Mr. Clerk, I have a motion to second. 886 01:18:31,370 --> 01:18:32,270 The roll-complease. 887 01:18:32,570 --> 01:18:32,650 Good. 888 01:18:33,390 --> 01:18:34,010 Council Member Inman? 889 01:18:34,430 --> 01:18:34,570 Yes. 890 01:18:34,950 --> 01:18:35,450 Council Member Newton. 891 01:18:35,690 --> 01:18:35,830 Yes. 892 01:18:36,150 --> 01:18:36,890 Council Member Guthrie? 893 01:18:36,970 --> 01:18:37,090 Yes. 894 01:18:37,090 --> 01:18:38,090 Thank you, Mayor Fulton-Marie. 895 01:18:38,730 --> 01:18:39,450 Mayor Wagi? 896 01:18:39,730 --> 01:18:39,870 Yes. 897 01:18:40,230 --> 01:18:41,250 Motion passes, 5-0. 898 01:18:42,530 --> 01:18:47,010 The next item by Spaniel Road, Heinz Avenue Improvements, Mr. Garcia. 899 01:18:47,790 --> 01:18:49,550 Yes, thank you, members of the City Council. 900 01:18:49,810 --> 01:18:54,070 This item is going to be presented by our Public Works Director, Ms. Gaglioni, who is going 901 01:18:54,070 --> 01:19:00,110 to provide you with an update and a couple of options for the intersection improvements. 902 01:19:00,490 --> 01:19:02,210 We don't want to call it any particular item. 903 01:19:02,310 --> 01:19:07,070 We want to refer to it as intersection improvements as we're going to present you with two 904 01:19:07,070 --> 01:19:11,750 different ways that you can accomplish that for this intersection as well as a potential 905 01:19:11,750 --> 01:19:14,210 broader view. So I'll turn it over to Ms. Gaglione. 906 01:19:14,850 --> 01:19:18,890 Thank you very much, Mr. Garcia. And I also have senior engineer Nate Stong here with us 907 01:19:18,890 --> 01:19:20,970 in case there are additional questions. 908 01:19:27,500 --> 01:19:30,640 On March 4, the Council directed staff to return 909 01:19:30,640 --> 01:19:34,600 with a discussion on potential options for the intersection of Price Canyon Road and Bell 910 01:19:34,600 --> 01:19:40,380 Street. There was an interest in a holistic view of the traffic patterns and road wage 911 01:19:40,380 --> 01:19:45,020 geometry that make this a challenging project, and Council was interested in taking a second 912 01:19:45,020 --> 01:19:50,820 look at the peanut roundabout as a similar intersection, a similar roundabout at the intersection 913 01:19:50,820 --> 01:19:54,800 of Union Road at Golden Hill Road and Pasal Robles has been working quite well. 914 01:19:55,700 --> 01:19:56,800 This is that roundabout. 915 01:19:56,920 --> 01:20:03,020 This actually appears to be a really well designed roundabout, and I'd like to first just talk 916 01:20:03,020 --> 01:20:05,920 a little bit about what makes roundabouts function well. 917 01:20:06,680 --> 01:20:11,560 The designers play a few psychological tricks on us to make us behave well in the round 918 01:20:11,560 --> 01:20:11,840 about. 919 01:20:12,580 --> 01:20:18,480 One of those is we know that if we're turning a corner and we take it a little too quickly, 920 01:20:18,480 --> 01:20:22,240 we actually feel ourselves sort of get pushed out away from the curve. 921 01:20:23,040 --> 01:20:25,540 And so that makes us automatically slow down. 922 01:20:26,220 --> 01:20:32,620 Roundabout designers do this by slanting the road to the outside from 2 to 5 percent. 923 01:20:32,620 --> 01:20:35,780 So you always feel like you're slightly going too fast. 924 01:20:36,220 --> 01:20:40,340 Another thing if you take a look at the plantings in the center of this roundabout, which 925 01:20:40,340 --> 01:20:46,860 of imagining we'll get much larger, it slows you down because you can't see to the other 926 01:20:46,860 --> 01:20:47,220 side. 927 01:20:47,960 --> 01:20:51,660 And so when you can't see where you're going or on the other side, you tend to slow down 928 01:20:51,660 --> 01:20:53,140 and take it more safely. 929 01:20:53,800 --> 01:20:58,360 The other thing is if you look, and I made my cursor really big, hopefully it's easy, 930 01:20:59,440 --> 01:21:05,020 You're coming from a wider road, and as you enter the throat of this approach, you will 931 01:21:05,020 --> 01:21:10,300 have a constriction, and that narrowing makes you stop and say, whoa, I've got to pay 932 01:21:10,300 --> 01:21:10,660 attention. 933 01:21:10,960 --> 01:21:11,700 I have to slow down. 934 01:21:11,760 --> 01:21:13,060 I don't have as much space now. 935 01:21:13,580 --> 01:21:16,560 And then as you go, you come into what is known as a deflection curve. 936 01:21:17,040 --> 01:21:19,840 And the deflection curve is made to slow you down further. 937 01:21:20,000 --> 01:21:24,560 And as you come into this curve, you see a crosswalk, and you're alerted to other things 938 01:21:24,560 --> 01:21:25,560 that are important. 939 01:21:25,560 --> 01:21:34,240 This roundabout also will allow a semi-truck to turn but use this apron to handle the off-tracking 940 01:21:34,240 --> 01:21:35,320 the trucks will often do. 941 01:21:35,980 --> 01:21:40,260 If you look at the size of the vehicle's relative to the roundabout, you'll see that there's 942 01:21:40,260 --> 01:21:46,700 ample room for whatever vehicle is supposed to be on the road to navigate this roundabout. 943 01:21:47,080 --> 01:21:48,740 We'll just keep some of those things in mind. 944 01:21:49,340 --> 01:21:55,940 This is an overview of Price Canyon Road at Bellow Street if we went with the traffic control signal. 945 01:21:56,820 --> 01:22:01,180 You'll notice everybody knows who's driven it. It's an oddly skewed intersection. 946 01:22:01,380 --> 01:22:06,080 There's just a lot of things to consider. You have heels and everything else around you. 947 01:22:06,120 --> 01:22:10,560 And every leg coming in is at a different elevation, which can make it challenging. 948 01:22:12,300 --> 01:22:14,620 Now here's a look at the PISMO peanuts. 949 01:22:14,620 --> 01:22:24,500 And one of the things you notice is there's an orange line here that shows that vehicles should go around if they wanted to make a left completely round and do that. 950 01:22:25,060 --> 01:22:34,700 One thing that stands out is in this tight space, I don't see that they were able to get the deflection curve that would actually slow vehicles down very much. 951 01:22:35,140 --> 01:22:41,480 And then you'll notice here that it's a flat space. There are no plantings to obscure view. 952 01:22:41,480 --> 01:22:49,020 So, we looked at a comparison of the two roundabouts and the top is the pink Paso peanut 953 01:22:49,660 --> 01:22:52,840 and the lower one is the Pismo peanut. 954 01:22:53,220 --> 01:22:59,400 And you can see that the external diameter here is 115 feet as compared to 80 feet 955 01:22:59,400 --> 01:23:01,900 for the peanut roundabout Pismo. 956 01:23:02,880 --> 01:23:10,460 Again, here I see that these really nice deflection curves coming in but I don't see that so much 957 01:23:10,460 --> 01:23:15,620 here. And this is an area where you have vehicles coming in at a high rate of speed and you 958 01:23:15,620 --> 01:23:21,020 want to slow them down. The other thing is that I haven't seen before, these red arrows 959 01:23:21,480 --> 01:23:28,180 say that a truck will make a left turn over the center of the roundabout. And I'm not sure 960 01:23:28,180 --> 01:23:34,800 how that really works in reality because you could have a truck sitting here waiting for 961 01:23:34,800 --> 01:23:39,760 a chance to turn left and backing traffic up so it wouldn't necessarily create a more 962 01:23:39,760 --> 01:23:46,720 efficient situation, and then this radius at 20 feet, your standard curb radius at a residential 963 01:23:46,720 --> 01:23:49,680 area is 25 feet, so it's even smaller than that. 964 01:23:51,080 --> 01:23:54,900 So as we look deeper at the alternatives, flaws emerged on both of them. 965 01:23:55,540 --> 01:24:01,360 As I said, roundabouts require adequate space to function properly, and there's not enough 966 01:24:01,360 --> 01:24:04,900 space at that location without acquiring additional right of way. 967 01:24:05,580 --> 01:24:09,820 And any roundabout at that location will need to accommodate truck traffic because price 968 01:24:09,820 --> 01:24:12,560 catered road is a 65-foot truck route. 969 01:24:13,520 --> 01:24:17,380 And then with either a roundabout or a signal control, we're going to need coordination 970 01:24:17,380 --> 01:24:19,120 with the signal and heines and price. 971 01:24:21,560 --> 01:24:26,860 So sometimes you get buried in the solutions and you have to step back and say what's the 972 01:24:26,860 --> 01:24:27,700 problem we want to solve. 973 01:24:28,460 --> 01:24:32,000 So the intersection of price-cainting road and bellow street is heavily congested during 974 01:24:32,000 --> 01:24:37,540 the PMP, level of service is currently at a level of service D and that's on an A to F scale. 975 01:24:38,220 --> 01:24:42,140 It will decline to a level of service F, it build out. 976 01:24:42,660 --> 01:24:46,240 And that's because the vehicle's on Bella Street experience a lengthy delay. 977 01:24:46,980 --> 01:24:50,800 And then traffic on Price Canyon Road does back up for a significant distance. 978 01:24:51,980 --> 01:24:58,180 So requirements for the solution are that during the PMP hour, we need to improve traffic flow so 979 01:24:58,180 --> 01:25:02,940 that vehicles waiting to turn from Below Street on to price canyon road do not experience 980 01:25:02,940 --> 01:25:08,520 significant delays while not increasing but hopefully reducing the eastbound queue 981 01:25:08,870 --> 01:25:13,160 on price canyon road. We know that some of our challenges are that 982 01:25:13,160 --> 01:25:18,040 price canyon road functions as highway. It has a vertical and horizontal curves coming 983 01:25:18,040 --> 01:25:23,900 into this intersection. It's a root of regional significance. It's carrying traffic from the 984 01:25:23,900 --> 01:25:26,680 the city of slow and slow under unincorporated 985 01:25:26,680 --> 01:25:29,260 and in the valley, all to the Southbound 101. 986 01:25:30,120 --> 01:25:31,380 The amount of traffic will continue 987 01:25:31,380 --> 01:25:32,840 because there's significant development 988 01:25:32,840 --> 01:25:33,960 going on in those areas. 989 01:25:34,660 --> 01:25:36,680 And when there's congestion to the north of us 990 01:25:36,680 --> 01:25:38,980 on Highway 101, it encourages drivers 991 01:25:38,980 --> 01:25:42,580 to go down to 27 to price canyon to the Southbound 101. 992 01:25:43,420 --> 01:25:46,080 So it's just a layout of our regional traffic. 993 01:25:47,020 --> 01:25:49,080 And you will see the slide a couple of times. 994 01:25:49,400 --> 01:25:50,160 It wasn't a mistake. 995 01:25:50,700 --> 01:25:53,000 I think it's good to highlight where these cars 996 01:25:53,000 --> 01:25:54,260 are coming from and where they're going. 997 01:25:55,740 --> 01:25:57,580 We also have intersection geometry. 998 01:25:57,900 --> 01:26:00,180 We know it's skewed at acute angles, which 999 01:26:00,180 --> 01:26:01,180 complicates design. 1000 01:26:01,660 --> 01:26:04,080 The elevation differences also complicate design. 1001 01:26:04,260 --> 01:26:06,340 The topography can impede site distance 1002 01:26:06,340 --> 01:26:07,880 and also complicate design. 1003 01:26:08,480 --> 01:26:11,260 Acute angles also make it more difficult to look behind you 1004 01:26:11,260 --> 01:26:13,960 because you have to look so far back. 1005 01:26:14,720 --> 01:26:17,620 And price skating road is a 65 foot truck route. 1006 01:26:18,060 --> 01:26:19,400 And it's trucks with the kingpin. 1007 01:26:19,660 --> 01:26:21,280 So it's the cab and the trailer in the back. 1008 01:26:21,280 --> 01:26:26,220 So tractor trailers, fire engines, and PG&E trucks regularly navigate this corridor. 1009 01:26:27,640 --> 01:26:33,420 And from price at Heinz Avenue, traffic backs up from that intersection eastward past 1010 01:26:33,420 --> 01:26:33,860 bellow. 1011 01:26:34,800 --> 01:26:39,300 So vehicles couldn't make the turn on the price canyon road from bellow if the middle 1012 01:26:39,300 --> 01:26:41,400 of that intersection is jammed with other cars. 1013 01:26:42,320 --> 01:26:44,860 So you can't just focus on this one intersection. 1014 01:26:45,220 --> 01:26:49,440 There's also a southbound one-on-one off ramp on Heinz, just east of Price, just add to the 1015 01:26:49,440 --> 01:26:49,720 party. 1016 01:26:49,720 --> 01:26:54,980 And then downstream is Price Street at Stimson Avenue, which has the highest number of collisions 1017 01:26:54,980 --> 01:26:55,620 in the city. 1018 01:26:56,660 --> 01:26:59,500 And here is some of that information. 1019 01:26:59,560 --> 01:27:03,440 This is from Slow Cogs Regional Road Safety Action Plan, the 2025 draft. 1020 01:27:04,180 --> 01:27:09,560 For eight of our priority locations, four of them are along this route. 1021 01:27:09,800 --> 01:27:14,820 Price Canyon, Invello, Stimson and Price, Ocean View and Price and Price and Hines. 1022 01:27:16,320 --> 01:27:18,080 Again, our regional traffic. 1023 01:27:18,880 --> 01:27:24,280 So, if we take a step back to recalibrate, we have an opportunity to design a solution 1024 01:27:24,280 --> 01:27:28,120 for multiple problems, not a guarantee, but an opportunity. 1025 01:27:28,580 --> 01:27:32,620 If we can take the price of the route, from price canning road of Bellow Street through 1026 01:27:32,620 --> 01:27:36,800 price of hines and then through Stimston and Ocean View Avenue, and make sure they function 1027 01:27:36,800 --> 01:27:42,480 as a system, then we could potentially improve traffic flow and reduce conditions at all 1028 01:27:42,480 --> 01:27:44,260 of the intersections along this route. 1029 01:27:44,260 --> 01:27:49,780 We would be able to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and potentially create a gateway 1030 01:27:49,780 --> 01:27:51,140 to Pismo Beach at the 101. 1031 01:27:52,520 --> 01:27:57,560 So staff's recommendation would be that Council direct staff to develop a request for proposals 1032 01:27:57,560 --> 01:28:03,020 to retain a consultant to perform a holistic evaluation of this regional route and all of 1033 01:28:03,020 --> 01:28:05,400 its impacts and potential opportunities for improvement. 1034 01:28:05,940 --> 01:28:10,480 That staff and consultant would return to Council with options for additional study and 1035 01:28:10,480 --> 01:28:14,080 And that we continue to work with SlowCog to emphasize the importance of this regional 1036 01:28:14,080 --> 01:28:19,100 route to the County of San Luis Obispo and its impact on the city of Pizmo Beach and 1037 01:28:19,100 --> 01:28:20,700 the need to invest in the solution. 1038 01:28:21,760 --> 01:28:23,240 And that concludes my presentation. 1039 01:28:24,500 --> 01:28:25,320 Thank you. 1040 01:28:25,960 --> 01:28:26,780 Very thorough. 1041 01:28:26,980 --> 01:28:27,380 Questions? 1042 01:28:28,940 --> 01:28:29,500 Go ahead. 1043 01:28:29,580 --> 01:28:30,380 I had a quick question. 1044 01:28:31,840 --> 01:28:39,000 So based on what you're saying, the peanut for price canyon would be really challenging 1045 01:28:39,000 --> 01:28:48,980 not sure if it would address the solutions because of the trucks, the turning, and so with 1046 01:28:48,980 --> 01:28:54,500 the light and working on the other intersections, if I'm understanding you right, you're saying 1047 01:28:54,500 --> 01:28:59,460 that making multiple improvements will, that's the key to the flow. 1048 01:29:00,140 --> 01:29:01,020 Is that what you're saying? 1049 01:29:01,080 --> 01:29:01,700 That is correct. 1050 01:29:02,340 --> 01:29:02,740 That is correct. 1051 01:29:02,940 --> 01:29:08,420 Addressing all of those intersections, all of that entire route as one system, you can 1052 01:29:08,420 --> 01:29:14,280 When you think of a traffic, you have water sheds and traffic sheds, and if you look 1053 01:29:14,280 --> 01:29:18,560 at traffic as water, at least water will spill out when it gets to a roadside. 1054 01:29:18,820 --> 01:29:23,960 The traffic won't, it just keeps backing up, so you need the intersection, the next intersection 1055 01:29:23,960 --> 01:29:28,700 to be clear if you want the intersection you're working on to work properly. 1056 01:29:30,060 --> 01:29:30,320 Go ahead. 1057 01:29:31,580 --> 01:29:37,900 I had the opportunity to drive to the Paserovelas peanut that a week ago, and it's very well 1058 01:29:37,900 --> 01:29:43,540 laid out and you're right that I didn't even realize it was a peanut because of the 1059 01:29:43,540 --> 01:29:48,500 foliage in the middle of it because you don't really see the other people on the other 1060 01:29:48,500 --> 01:29:52,500 side and what they're doing. So it wasn't until I was halfway through that I realized that 1061 01:29:52,500 --> 01:29:59,460 was the peanut and because that area is so small compared to the area in Paso Robos, it 1062 01:29:59,460 --> 01:29:59,680 does. 1063 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:24,400 It seemed to me to be difficult and I don't understand the logic in having trucks go over that peanut. So I'm glad you showed us all of that and how that works and how it works in Paso and how it would likely not work here. And so I really like the idea of looking through this whole region. There's a lot of things we need to look at. 1064 01:30:28,880 --> 01:30:33,060 What you've got opinion on, can we solve it or just make it better? 1065 01:30:33,060 --> 01:30:34,020 So, 1066 01:30:36,270 --> 01:30:40,370 in terms of trying to make things a little better, we have asked a traffic engineer 1067 01:30:40,370 --> 01:30:46,270 to give us a proposal to recalibrate the timing at Price and Hines, but there's, through 1068 01:30:46,270 --> 01:30:50,530 there's like 1,600 cars in an hour during the PM peak going through there. 1069 01:30:50,730 --> 01:30:53,150 We're talking about a lot of vehicles. 1070 01:30:53,870 --> 01:30:59,590 So, we have to be able to flush those vehicles through Price and Hines. 1071 01:30:59,590 --> 01:31:02,250 So, how do we, how do we do that? 1072 01:31:02,630 --> 01:31:07,450 It may come out that you have a signal at price, 1073 01:31:07,590 --> 01:31:09,250 and maybe you have roundabouts further on. 1074 01:31:09,650 --> 01:31:12,510 I don't know, but you have a lot of vehicles 1075 01:31:12,510 --> 01:31:15,410 to get down there and through those two intersections. 1076 01:31:15,470 --> 01:31:16,530 And you need to do it quickly. 1077 01:31:17,390 --> 01:31:20,070 One of the things is this intersection 1078 01:31:20,070 --> 01:31:21,790 and what is here exists now, 1079 01:31:22,110 --> 01:31:24,550 and so sort of grandfathered in 1080 01:31:24,550 --> 01:31:26,250 from a design immunity perspective. 1081 01:31:26,250 --> 01:31:41,170 But anything we do that's new needs to work and needs to be safe and check all of the boxes and so that's why it's just really important that we don't try to look at one piece and think we're gonna solve it and create any problem. 1082 01:31:41,410 --> 01:31:48,030 Yeah, I didn't know what the traffic counts are, it's even possible to push that many vehicles through it during those crunch time periods. 1083 01:31:48,610 --> 01:31:56,570 I would say if you would move them through slowly, you wouldn't have the backup, you would 1084 01:31:56,570 --> 01:32:02,470 have to set, if you had a single tool, you would have to set that, you'd have to set 1085 01:32:02,470 --> 01:32:06,190 it so the price canyon road is green unless triggered by bellow. 1086 01:32:06,630 --> 01:32:11,850 And you'd have to reduce the amount of time that you have that green for bellow and you 1087 01:32:11,850 --> 01:32:18,070 You need to flush out Heinz at price around about could probably handle a tremendous amount 1088 01:32:18,070 --> 01:32:18,650 of traffic. 1089 01:32:19,690 --> 01:32:24,310 And then go ahead and see if you're moving that many cars through it during that time. 1090 01:32:24,930 --> 01:32:29,030 Now you have less of a gap as you come through Stimson and Ocean View. 1091 01:32:29,610 --> 01:32:35,210 So what is the best way to deal with that traffic that drivers who want to come out are not 1092 01:32:35,210 --> 01:32:38,110 going to have the gap that they had when there was a traffic signal? 1093 01:32:38,690 --> 01:32:40,610 I know we're doing a downtown study too. 1094 01:32:40,610 --> 01:32:46,730 So, we would do this first and incorporate their results into our downtown study, is that 1095 01:32:46,730 --> 01:32:47,170 what you're thinking? 1096 01:32:47,370 --> 01:32:53,530 Yes, I would suggest seeing if there is a layout that works for this, and then we can 1097 01:32:53,530 --> 01:32:58,390 work with the downtown study to see if there's impacts from that. 1098 01:32:58,770 --> 01:32:58,890 Okay. 1099 01:32:59,590 --> 01:33:03,070 Last thing, if you want to see how bad traffic can get, let's wait until they start the 1100 01:33:03,070 --> 01:33:08,750 highway 101 construction and everybody de-tours around, so we will be able to see how much 1101 01:33:08,750 --> 01:33:09,850 worse it can really get. 1102 01:33:10,550 --> 01:33:11,430 We'll see our future. 1103 01:33:12,650 --> 01:33:15,330 Glass half full, glass half dimpy. 1104 01:33:15,590 --> 01:33:19,470 Once it's done presumably it'll be some of traffic in 227. 1105 01:33:19,650 --> 01:33:23,630 But there's also a couple of roundabouts at Buckley and at 1106 01:33:29,870 --> 01:33:35,270 which both were the golf courses, the Rancho. 1107 01:33:36,010 --> 01:33:39,590 And when those are done that could move traffic 1108 01:33:39,590 --> 01:33:41,230 through that area perhaps a little bit quicker 1109 01:33:41,230 --> 01:33:46,170 because that's currently backing up there so this is part of slow cogs effort and I think 1110 01:33:46,910 --> 01:33:52,230 I'm hopeful that once we get that managed lane done that that will be some pressure 1111 01:33:52,980 --> 01:33:57,110 you know using your water analogy through that area any other questions 1112 01:33:57,850 --> 01:34:04,010 I have one question following up but what you were commenting so as you were suggesting the lighting 1113 01:34:04,010 --> 01:34:09,410 to work and and the flow through did you say it's potential that you would have a 1114 01:34:09,410 --> 01:34:16,150 around about at price and price canyon and price street. 1115 01:34:17,230 --> 01:34:21,430 So when council member Newton asked, is there possible to get that much traffic through 1116 01:34:21,430 --> 01:34:21,690 there? 1117 01:34:21,870 --> 01:34:21,930 Yeah. 1118 01:34:22,090 --> 01:34:25,410 If you, if around about can move a lot of traffic. 1119 01:34:25,410 --> 01:34:25,550 Yeah. 1120 01:34:25,730 --> 01:34:25,830 Right. 1121 01:34:25,950 --> 01:34:27,710 And so that's a potential option. 1122 01:34:28,510 --> 01:34:28,890 It's interesting. 1123 01:34:29,910 --> 01:34:36,210 And I, I don't want, I don't, I don't want to, I don't want to put my finger on the scale 1124 01:34:36,210 --> 01:34:40,610 anywhere, and I won't even do it with the consultants. I really want someone to look at this and 1125 01:34:40,610 --> 01:34:45,870 look at the whole thing. Correct. Right. To move everything. Okay. I like that idea a lot. Thank you. 1126 01:34:46,070 --> 01:34:50,810 Any other questions? Go ahead. Need to have a motion. Well, first of all, I need to go public. 1127 01:34:53,590 --> 01:34:57,710 I'll let you do that. Thank you. I have no speakers. 1128 01:34:57,890 --> 01:34:59,830 Let me public comment on this item. 1129 01:35:02,470 --> 01:35:04,430 Seeing none, I'll bring it back to council. 1130 01:35:04,430 --> 01:35:17,150 or further discussion deliberation and I think what you're looking for is your recommendation is to say go ahead and fix this problem by getting a consultant. 1131 01:35:17,570 --> 01:35:19,550 And is that, do you need a motion to that effect? 1132 01:35:20,150 --> 01:35:28,230 No motion, I think, as long as we have consensus from the Council that we want to take a more comprehensive rather than focus on one intersection. 1133 01:35:29,090 --> 01:35:39,250 Yeah, my only comment is I think the solution is going to definitely be so huge that it's a more of a slow-cog responsibility than a city responsibility because I don't think it's all Pisma residents. 1134 01:35:39,410 --> 01:35:42,330 No, we're starting that conversation. 1135 01:35:43,350 --> 01:35:48,890 I know Mayor Wage mentioned that the last council meeting that he's having conversations he's on the slow-cog board as well. 1136 01:35:49,970 --> 01:35:54,270 And I know Miss Gaglioni is also starting to have those conversations with slow cog. 1137 01:35:54,450 --> 01:36:00,170 We need to start planting the seed, but this is a regional problem that happens to be 1138 01:36:00,170 --> 01:36:05,490 in PISMO beach, but it is a regional problem in PISMO beach. 1139 01:36:06,190 --> 01:36:12,670 So that's the messaging that we will definitely be pushing very clearly and aggressively. 1140 01:36:13,650 --> 01:36:22,560 I've been making this point to slow-cog for about the last eight years, so they're very 1141 01:36:22,560 --> 01:36:23,660 well aware of it. 1142 01:36:23,820 --> 01:36:30,700 It's kind of on their list, but like all things, it's going to be cost and funding and revenue 1143 01:36:30,700 --> 01:36:31,180 available. 1144 01:36:35,200 --> 01:36:40,040 So it's not going to happen always takes longer when you have to get money from somebody else 1145 01:36:40,040 --> 01:36:41,120 but it's on the list. 1146 01:36:41,120 --> 01:36:44,200 Any other comments, discussion on this? 1147 01:36:44,500 --> 01:36:46,000 I think we've given direction to move forward 1148 01:36:46,000 --> 01:36:51,240 with our new Public Works Director recommendation. 1149 01:36:52,660 --> 01:37:00,080 Move on then to our final item, which is item 12B. 1150 01:37:00,400 --> 01:37:02,760 Yes, squirrel control, Mr. Garcia. 1151 01:37:02,980 --> 01:37:06,800 Yes, this item is also going to be presented by Ms. Gaglioni. 1152 01:37:07,380 --> 01:37:09,980 An item that continues to evolve, 1153 01:37:09,980 --> 01:37:17,200 All we've most recently just received even more updates from the state of California on some potential developments. 1154 01:37:17,580 --> 01:37:26,140 So we'll provide an overview here and happy to have any direction that the city council may have on how they would like us to address some of the concerns. 1155 01:37:28,520 --> 01:37:30,840 Thank you, Mr. Garcia, Mayor, council members. 1156 01:37:31,820 --> 01:37:36,160 We do have a squirrel population problem in some of our parks. 1157 01:37:36,160 --> 01:37:42,780 Since we stopped baiting them a couple of years ago, the population has exploded. 1158 01:37:43,440 --> 01:37:48,520 We do have people feeding them, they will come up and eat from the hands of folks. 1159 01:37:49,180 --> 01:37:54,760 I had a very interesting experience going to Eldone Park with Mr. Garcia and Mr. 1160 01:37:54,860 --> 01:38:00,980 Eldridge, and as he spoke and pointed, they came up ready to be fed. 1161 01:38:01,480 --> 01:38:06,690 Yes, that's correct, that's correct, but they are rodents. 1162 01:38:06,690 --> 01:38:13,970 And there are diseases that squirrels can carry, and so all they look cute, they're not a great thing for the parks. 1163 01:38:13,970 --> 01:38:22,890 The other thing is their tunneling moves water through and out the bluffs and helps to accelerate the collapse of the bluffs. 1164 01:38:23,310 --> 01:38:32,870 So FEMA made the comment about that when they were out here at one of our sites that we need to take care of the squirrel problem because it's impacting the bluffs. 1165 01:38:32,870 --> 01:38:44,790 So, we started getting in touch with the county and then with the state and what we have found out is the system of baiting that we used to use is no longer legal. 1166 01:38:45,530 --> 01:38:46,830 So, that's off the table. 1167 01:38:47,590 --> 01:39:00,950 We have our carbon monoxide machine, but it hasn't been effective because there's probably a whole underground city under there now and it dissipates the gas plus on the other side is open air with the bluffs. 1168 01:39:00,950 --> 01:39:07,950 So, what we found out is our options, our legal options at this point is a poison called 1169 01:39:07,950 --> 01:39:14,610 rosal. The only problem is it's not recommended due to high toxicity to people in animals, especially 1170 01:39:14,610 --> 01:39:19,410 dogs. You can't use it near a lot of people, you can't use it on walkways, you can't use 1171 01:39:19,410 --> 01:39:27,090 it near water. So, that is something that obviously isn't going to work for us. We have checked 1172 01:39:27,090 --> 01:39:33,310 on birth control, and if someone in Europe is trying to work on this, but they don't have 1173 01:39:33,310 --> 01:39:38,130 anything yet, but we do know they breed two times a year from June through August and 1174 01:39:38,130 --> 01:39:44,410 from December through February, so those are good times to take action. So, as I said, 1175 01:39:44,530 --> 01:39:49,490 the carbon monoxide poisoning hasn't been effective because there's just too much area under there, 1176 01:39:49,810 --> 01:39:55,510 so the other option is called mechanical control. And mechanical control, we trap them on site, 1177 01:39:55,510 --> 01:39:58,550 we dispatched them on site and then disposed of them. 1178 01:40:00,190 --> 01:40:06,050 That there's a couple of ways of doing that that are recommended by a council of veterinarians 1179 01:40:06,050 --> 01:40:08,290 that advise the state on these matters. 1180 01:40:08,690 --> 01:40:14,250 One is shooting and the other which could be pellet gun or blight powder. 1181 01:40:15,070 --> 01:40:19,070 The other is they actually sent us a plan for a small gas chamber. 1182 01:40:20,070 --> 01:40:21,570 So, once they're caught, 1183 01:40:23,580 --> 01:40:26,840 they can be placed in the chamber where we can concentrate the 1184 01:40:26,840 --> 01:40:28,560 carbon monoxide, then they just go to sleep. 1185 01:40:30,140 --> 01:40:34,140 Problem is we have to do it on site because we're not supposed to transport these squirrels 1186 01:40:34,140 --> 01:40:35,140 from one place to another. 1187 01:40:36,260 --> 01:40:36,940 Is that a regulation? 1188 01:40:37,500 --> 01:40:37,660 Yes. 1189 01:40:39,120 --> 01:40:45,440 Well, they don't want you potentially bringing squirrels with this disease to an area where 1190 01:40:45,440 --> 01:40:49,320 squirrels don't have that disease yet, which is why most of those, and you can't take them 1191 01:40:49,320 --> 01:40:53,200 and set them free somewhere. They don't want that. They are rodents. They're pests. 1192 01:40:55,900 --> 01:41:02,160 So that is, I mean, we would like to hear if Council has any direction for us, but I believe 1193 01:41:02,160 --> 01:41:08,800 at this point, the only option we have is either shooting or a gas chamber. 1194 01:41:09,180 --> 01:41:14,800 Well, I know I have three friends that already engage in shooting behavior in their backyards 1195 01:41:14,800 --> 01:41:34,300 in another county. That's kind of a joke, because I'm sure the police chief doesn't want shooting happening of squirrels in our park, so I would go with the CO2, it puts in the sleep. It's not as agree just in my opinion. 1196 01:41:35,160 --> 01:41:50,980 would be CO. Yeah. Right. Bad question. Well, I, in fact, before we give direction, I guess, I'd like, before we give direction, I'd like to go through questions and give a public comment and bring it back for direction. 1197 01:41:53,020 --> 01:41:56,800 Okay. Can I ask a question? Are you going to go the public? No, go ahead. 1198 01:41:58,560 --> 01:42:07,800 Has anyone considered a dual approach, especially for feeding the squirrels on educating the 1199 01:42:07,800 --> 01:42:14,000 public on why, because a lot of people don't realize that squirrels are undermining our 1200 01:42:14,000 --> 01:42:14,320 cliffs. 1201 01:42:14,460 --> 01:42:21,100 They're coming in from an agricultural area where they're not thinking about that, their kids 1202 01:42:21,100 --> 01:42:27,780 are seeing acute squirrels so if we can educate people I mean you could do it in a cartoon form 1203 01:42:27,780 --> 01:42:33,520 a fun you know however about feeding the squirrels and the damage that they're doing I don't know 1204 01:42:33,520 --> 01:42:39,060 if that's affected but for me if I'm going into an area and I see a video and I'm like when my 1205 01:42:39,060 --> 01:42:43,240 daughter was little I would have easily said let's make sure we don't feed the squirrels I understand 1206 01:42:43,240 --> 01:42:49,340 it's very harmful so I might my mayor may not work but has that been considered maybe a public 1207 01:42:49,340 --> 01:42:57,920 I think we have not considered that explicitly, but I think it's a great idea and it's something that we can easily do and put together. 1208 01:42:58,220 --> 01:43:01,480 So I think that should be a component of any solution. 1209 01:43:02,740 --> 01:43:07,400 So I think that's a great idea and something we can work with our team on. 1210 01:43:08,180 --> 01:43:13,880 Any other questions? Let me go out to the public. I have no speakers left. Any public comment on this item? 1211 01:43:15,720 --> 01:43:25,300 Seeing none, and I guess rather than I realize you're looking for direction, I'm inclined 1212 01:43:25,300 --> 01:43:29,200 to say do what you think is because you're going to have to care out the program and 1213 01:43:29,200 --> 01:43:37,240 both of them can be effective, but rather than I don't feel comfortable saying, here's 1214 01:43:37,240 --> 01:43:42,400 the best way to do it, I would rather rely on your professional experience and how you're 1215 01:43:42,400 --> 01:43:44,340 working with your staff on how we can take care of. 1216 01:43:44,340 --> 01:43:46,760 I think certainly the signage is important. 1217 01:43:47,640 --> 01:43:50,480 We need to tell people you feel a scroll 1218 01:43:50,480 --> 01:43:51,980 and the fluff's going to go away 1219 01:43:51,980 --> 01:43:53,300 and there goes whatever. 1220 01:43:53,860 --> 01:43:55,000 We won't be able to sit here anymore, 1221 01:43:55,500 --> 01:43:56,220 stand here anymore. 1222 01:43:56,900 --> 01:43:58,880 I think certainly education is important, 1223 01:43:59,200 --> 01:44:01,840 but I guess I'm be more comfortable 1224 01:44:01,840 --> 01:44:04,780 with this giving you direction to take care of the problem 1225 01:44:04,780 --> 01:44:05,560 as best you can, 1226 01:44:05,720 --> 01:44:06,700 because there's very few options. 1227 01:44:07,740 --> 01:44:08,200 Seems like. 1228 01:44:08,480 --> 01:44:09,600 Did you have a question or a comment? 1229 01:44:10,620 --> 01:44:11,020 Any others? 1230 01:44:11,020 --> 01:44:14,820 Well, I'm sad there's not an adoptive school program, you know, and it's not illegal. 1231 01:44:15,500 --> 01:44:21,180 But I want to agree with the mayor is, you know, we give them things may change over time. 1232 01:44:21,480 --> 01:44:23,200 Maybe other practices that are better. 1233 01:44:23,680 --> 01:44:27,340 So I would say leave it to their professional opinion on what's most effective. 1234 01:44:27,980 --> 01:44:34,140 Yeah, you have very few tools and I'm not going to try to use my judgment to tell you what the best tool is. 1235 01:44:34,300 --> 01:44:34,580 Go ahead. 1236 01:44:34,580 --> 01:44:41,040 No, I agree also because we have the same issue with the pigeons and I think we've kind 1237 01:44:41,040 --> 01:44:43,660 of managed that, so right. 1238 01:44:45,580 --> 01:44:47,040 Okay, anyone else? 1239 01:44:47,280 --> 01:44:53,160 I think consensus is use your judgment best way to take care of it along with some signage. 1240 01:44:53,900 --> 01:44:55,120 Is there anything else on this item? 1241 01:44:56,220 --> 01:44:56,460 Okay. 1242 01:44:56,840 --> 01:44:57,460 Thank you. 1243 01:44:57,460 --> 01:44:59,800 Okay, this is our last item. Any council? 1244 01:45:00,000 --> 01:45:29,700 Comments or requests? Go ahead. I'm going to say, um, I don't know, uh, our law enforcement is doing a special operation in Shell Beach, but it was great to see the enforcement this weekend. Um, seen a pullover, everyone that's rolling through the stop signs. I went by one way. I mean, there's people just pulled over all day to the point where you want to just pull over and watch because I mean, we all know their stop signs, but obviously some people don't. Yeah. And I think quite a few, uh, 1245 01:45:29,700 --> 01:45:31,120 We've got a little citation. 1246 01:45:32,120 --> 01:45:33,420 So it's great to see the enforcement. 1247 01:45:34,000 --> 01:45:34,440 Thank you. 1248 01:45:34,700 --> 01:45:35,880 Just a little levity here. 1249 01:45:36,040 --> 01:45:38,160 Perhaps if the chief let us know where these are, 1250 01:45:38,420 --> 01:45:40,480 the council can hold up signs. 1251 01:45:40,500 --> 01:45:42,120 This was a 10 or something. 1252 01:45:43,260 --> 01:45:44,800 It's horrible what they're doing. 1253 01:45:45,640 --> 01:45:45,940 It's just, 1254 01:45:48,320 --> 01:45:50,100 I think enforcement, 1255 01:45:50,600 --> 01:45:53,220 and I think you fact, do you want to address that or something? 1256 01:45:53,460 --> 01:45:55,080 I think maximum enforcement sometimes, 1257 01:45:55,080 --> 01:45:58,120 where you catch everyone with everybody is one way to handle it. 1258 01:45:58,240 --> 01:46:00,400 Do you have any thoughts, any comments on that, chief? 1259 01:46:02,200 --> 01:46:06,620 We have been given officer's son direction I know in the last month we've been focusing on 1260 01:46:06,620 --> 01:46:09,520 just structure driving because that's one of the main collision factors. 1261 01:46:10,900 --> 01:46:15,780 So we have officers out doing that special enforcement just looking for individuals who 1262 01:46:15,780 --> 01:46:18,880 are looking at their cell phone, talking on their cell phone, things like that. 1263 01:46:19,060 --> 01:46:27,320 So again, as we have things that we realize our problem, we are trying to focus on that and 1264 01:46:27,320 --> 01:46:28,760 address it throughout the year. 1265 01:46:28,760 --> 01:46:31,480 I appreciate that. Go ahead. 1266 01:46:32,080 --> 01:46:33,340 Did you get any bikes? 1267 01:46:34,240 --> 01:46:38,420 No, Willie. She'll be, I'll be stopped at a stop sign and there'll be one that'll zoom. 1268 01:46:38,620 --> 01:46:41,360 It freaks you out when you're stopped. You're thinking, why don't they, I agree. 1269 01:46:42,740 --> 01:46:47,000 You know, and again, it's something that I've, I've been forced. 1270 01:46:47,160 --> 01:46:51,920 I don't know how many bike sites, but we are asking that and I know one of the other concerns 1271 01:46:51,920 --> 01:46:56,140 that Mr. Garcia's brought to my intention is just been more concerned with dogs off leash. 1272 01:46:57,000 --> 01:47:03,340 I have heard a lot of the citations happening over the weekends also, so, again, as those 1273 01:47:03,340 --> 01:47:07,940 things come into me, we definitely get that information out to either our CSC or our 1274 01:47:07,940 --> 01:47:10,840 traffic officers to, you know, make sure we're addressing those concerns. 1275 01:47:11,280 --> 01:47:19,300 Well, good comment. I had heard about the enhanced enforcement or distracted driving. I wasn't 1276 01:47:19,300 --> 01:47:23,060 sure if we were doing part of that. I knew the CHP was, looks like we were doing it, too. 1277 01:47:23,060 --> 01:47:27,680 Okay, thank you. Anything else? Seem none of this meeting's adjourned.