Thank you all for viewing tonight's planning commission meeting. I'd like to
call this meeting to order at the city of Clear Lake chambers on Tuesday, June
9th, 2026 at 6 PM. As a reminder, we are currently live streaming this meeting on
the city's YouTube channel. Please be aware the public will not be able to
provide verbal comment during this meeting if attending via Zoom. However,
the public can submit comments and writing for commission consideration by
commenting via the Q&A function in the Zoom platform. To begin with, can I get
a roll call, please?
Commissioner Williams >> here.
» Commissioner Silva, Vice Chair English >> here,
» and Chair Smallley >> here.
» And Commissioner Counts is absent.
» For those present, will you please stand for the pledge of allegiance?
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the
republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all.
» Okay, we'll move on to the adoption of the agenda. Uh, city manager or city
planner, are there any modifications? No modifications, Mr. Chair.
» Thank you, sir. >> Um, may I have a motion to adopt it the
agenda? >> I move to adopt the agenda as presented.
» Second.
May I have a roll call on the vote, please?
» Commissioner Williams, >> I.
» Commissioner Silva, >> I. Vice Chair English
» I >> and Chair Smallley
» I.
» So this is the time for any member of the public to address the planning
commission on any matter not on the agenda that is within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the city. The Brown Act with limited exceptions does not allow
commission staff to discuss issues brought forth under public comment. The
commission cannot act on non non-aggenda items. Concerns may be referred to staff
or placed on the next available agenda. Please note that comments from the
public will also be taken on each agenda item. Comments shall be limited to three
minutes per person.
Are there any members of the public in the council chambers who would like to
speak at the podium?
Will you come up and introduce yourself please?
» My name is Seth Dandridge. >> Um, basically I just wanted to I just
had a couple questions about the operation.
» Uh, one >> I'm sorry. Are you are you addressing um
uh the permit issue? >> Yes. So
» that comes that comes in a while. >> Okay.
» Yeah. Yeah. We'll get we'll get to the public comments on that one.
» Public comments. >> Yeah. Okay. Okay. No.
Have we received any written comments via the Q&A Zoom function?
» There are no comments on the Zoom, Mr. Chair.
» Uh so we'll move on to the consent items. Uh June 9th, 2026 planning
commission minutes. Uh recommended action is receive and file. Uh are there
any members of the public in chambers who wish to comment on the consent items
which there is none, right?
There's no consent items. Okay.
» There's just there's adoption of >> Yeah, I was going to make that. So, may
I have a motion to adopt the consent items?
I so move. >> Second.
» May I have a roll call on the vote, please?
» Commissioner Williams, >> I.
» Commissioner Silva, >> I.
» M. Vice Chair English, >> I.
» And Chair Smallley, >> I.
Um, so there's no business items tonight. So, we'll skip to public
hearings. Item one, discussion and consideration
of conditional use permits CUP 20265 to allow the rental of small boats and
personal watercraft located at 13 or 13885 Lakeshore Drive in Clear Lake,
California. Uh, recommended actions would be to adopt the resolution
PC202607. Uh staff, will you please proceed with
the report?
» Yes. Thank you, chair and commissioner. Um this is conditional use permit CUP
2020605 for watercraft rentals located at 13885
Lakeshore Drive. The name of the business is Clear
Cottages and Marina. Just
just a quick update on the staff report. Couple of changes here and in addition
to the conditions of approval as you can see there on the screen. So project
summary and the parking um packet page nine paragraph two uh change
approximately seven additional uh vehicles will be changed to as eight
additional vehicles. staff actually went out there and did a count and took some
pictures and confirmed that it was eight eight vehicles
um additional vehicles and what is an area that's um what we could call
overflow parking but it's actually striped parking. So
then for the conditions of approval um section A general conditions packet page
14 would like to add item eight. Um and I had a discussion with the applicant on
this and he signed with it. Um the public watercraft rental operation shall
be limited to a maximum of seven simultaneous rental parties during peak
period operating operating periods. A rental party shall mean an individual
renter or group of renters using utilizing a single rental watercraft
under one rental agreement. Reason why we're doing this, this is tied to
parking. Okay. This limitation is established based on the maximum proof
of rental fleet and that the existing on-site parking supply is adequate to
accommodate the approval of an amendment to this conditional use or other
entitlement as determined by the director.
So let's move on to the location here. Um so everybody I think knows where this
is located. It is zone mixed use. Um site size is approximately 2 2.06
acres. It's of an existing use with lodging, you know, small marina, and
they currently um rent watercrafts
to registered guest only. So, this kind of plays into how the rental to the
public and how that um determines peak period use.
So the applicant is requesting approval of CUP 202605
C 20265. It's categorical exempt. We're in a
categorically exempt project from this because it is a existing use with no
expansion. U the purpose is to allow the rental of
small boats and personal watercraft to members of the general public. Now keep
in mind this is in conjunction with the existing
uh rentals to guest and how that relates to parking. Okay. No new no new
construction onsite or or expansion is approved.
So they have an existing um lodge with lodge which includes
cottage. It's about 18 cottages. Well actually there are 18 cottages. Um
they've currently the current owner own has owned it since 2016 and they've been
renting only to guest the watercraft since 2017.
Uh they're proposing operating hours of 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. for watercraft rentals
and they have approximately five employees as stated in their
application. No changes proposed to the buildings,
docks, slips, parking areas and rental fleet size.
So the rental fleet is uh this is what they currently have. Um they have two
jet skis, a bassboat and two pontoons and then some kayaks. One is a single
person kayak and one is a double person kayak. And actually um in their
actual uh well their second proposal to us, we asked them to do an actual um
write up on it. They only included in that the um jet skis,
um the bass boat and the pontoons, but we went ahead and included the kayaks in
there also in terms of um parking as it relates to
parking. So this particular slides um as in their
application talk about safety requirements
doing SE pre-safety rental inspections and they've been doing this for several
years now. So renting to their guest so I'm guessing they pretty much have some
sense of what they need to do to be compliant. Um California voter card
verification. These are all things they're going to be doing. Minimum
operated age 21 years. uh liability and waivers in the rental agreements. Um
life jackets and they will be doing orientations and
competency reviews for those who are renting the the watercraft.
Uh they will have GPS tracking devices on the on the um watercraft.
Propellar guards obviously that would only be for the pal uh pontoon boats.
and the bass boat, the jet skiis typically have an impeller, so um that
probably doesn't need a propeller guard. Um
uh building things full spill prevention procedures, that was all spelled out in
the um the staff report how they would take care of that with sponges.
uh invasive species inspections. They pretty much um have that noted all over
the property for boats. Um post-rontal inspections and ma
maintenance. So this kind um the next slide kind of
leads up to kind of the gut of this you know whether this can work or not for
them. So existing so there's two parking analysis going on here. Uh lodging. So
there's one for lodging. Um so the code requirement they have 18 guests rooms
and one manager's unit. So per our code there's one parking space required for
each guest cottage plus two additional for every 10. So that's four parking
spaces. Then the manager's unit we you know that would be two consider that
kind of a dwelling or housing. So two spaces for that. So they would be
required to have a total of 24 um existing they have potentially 35. If
you're looking at the map there on the screen,
the yellow is existing parking spaces that are actually striped. Now the area
where you see the red dot, that's kind of hard packed dirt or gravel. And then
the red dot there, um I didn't measure the distance across. It's about 62 ft
which could accommodate double row parking. Um and in the end rows down by
the park they would you know we would it would make sure that that there were
some room for back out for the cars on the end down towards the the lake. So
with the red dot, there's a potential for six additional vehicles,
which aren't striped, but that's just a demonstration to show how potentially
you can get up to 41 parking spaces in this particular site. Um,
you would have to consider trailers obviously, but I spoke with the um
actually the applicant this afternoon uh in terms of how busy they are during the
week. They said 50% you know the rooms would be occupied dur
over the weekend would be 90%. You would have to consider also that they would
get first dibs to the rentals to the guest and then anything that's left over
would be for public general public rental.
Yeah. Um so um parking seats minimum code. So
essentially they exceed parking code based on just
the striped parking spaces.
Um so here's just the next slide is just a quick watercraft
um analysis by staff based on additional parking and what how many parties
rental agreement um one bass boat. So you'd have one party, so one vehicle. So
that's saying one space for one party, one parking space for one party. Okay.
Um, two pontoon boats, two parties. So two
vehicle parking spaces, two jet skiis, two vehicle parking spaces. Now, the
kayaks, that wasn't actually in their final proposal, but we went ahead and
added it anyway. So we would assume two additional parking spaces, so a total of
seven parking spaces. um for the watercraft.
Next slide is just um there's some pictures. So the first picture is of the
we'll call it overflow parking. That's where you would have seven additional
plus the potential of six. And then he they also do park trailers there. So,
um, that would literally, you know, um, get you up to 41 parking spaces. The
next slide is where it doesn't really tell a p tell the story here, but
that's where, uh, they launch their boats. So, there's some pull in and
backup room in there to launch boats down the ramp. Um, next picture is they
have do have two, uh, handicap parking spaces.
Um next slide is uh zoning consistency. So this area is again zone mixed use
visitor serving um which you know includes housing um
commercial I mean this isn't existing it's been there for a long time uh
recreational activities. So the main um from analysis standpoint
um so expansion only allows public assets to existing rental services.
That that's it. I mean we're not doing anything structurally. No more slips no
docks not being expanded. Um no physical expansion proposed.
So the staff finding is the project is consistent with the intent of the mixed
use district.
Um so with looking at our code there really is no category of land use that
you could fit watercraft in. So staff made the closest and best guess on that
which would be other outdoor commercial amusement
which that could potentially fit in. And if you actually look at the
definition of that it says allincclusive but you're talking about baseball
parks. These are really high demand traffic type uses. Baseball
um mini golf those sorts of things. So um
so with that with that type of use a use permit is required
to use appropriately is um a conditional use permit
because there's no expansion um staff determined that it would be
categorically exempt from SQA
And next slide is uh agency review. So these are the
agencies we uh sent the application to. We did not get any responses back and we
public publicly noticed it you know to the uh neighbors around within 300 ft.
So quick summary existing lodging marina use no expansions
um staff feels adequate parking and consistence with the mixeduse zoning
seek to exempt no agency objections that we have received. Um so um with motions
I mean we move to adopt number one move to adopt two move to deny the resolution
or send staff with directions to re-evaluate project
that concludes presentation
small microphone please. >> Thank you sir. I'll now ask
commissioners if there are any questions of staff on this item.
» I may have a couple and they'll probably also go for when the the uh applicant
comes up. Um part of our job is to imagine worst case scenarios like the
overcrowding and stuff like that. And the one obvious thing was the parking.
That's why you spent a lot of time with that. How you got to determine that it
was adequate. Um but uh if indeed um that street in that area is the overflow
parking, are there clearly marked places? Number one, just let me get them
all out and then you can answer. Um I have a concern full of a like a car full
of people visiting Clear Lake with eight kids in the car deep dear debarking not
debarking getting out getting out of their cars um and and and walking out on
that. So, it'd be nice if there was some procedure in place that would tell them
about that. It sounds like it might, if on a really busy day, require more
monitoring. Um, and maybe something specific. Um,
yeah. How many street parking spaces? Did you say five additional?
» No street parking. This is all on site. >> Okay. So, the overflow is all on site.
» There's no street parking. Yeah. seems pretty tight.
» I mean, when you say street parking, are you talking
» Well, it said it said in in here that overflow was there was overflow and also
adequate street parking. >> Okay. Well,
» um let me typo >> section F item two.
Uh existing partner. >> Well, if that's the case, that that's a
a mistake on our part and we didn't really mean street. So that would be it
says it's all on site. >> It says the code doesn't establish
specific off- streetet parking requirement. Okay. So
» so it seemed to just kind of blow that off by saying it's it it's um
it's it's that way. I mean that was what popped into my head. So if that's a
mistake and this is adequate with onsite then I guess that's a different story. I
suppose just be aware of it that that something like that could happen. Um,
this is great. I'm all for rental. I mean, the more people that move up here
full-time, the more people that are selling their boats and starting to
rent, and I love the fact that the economy is showing the ability to just
stay in the rental, and I'm all for this,
» but and we we did kind of look at it a peak a peak period. And
» you know, I talked to the applicant today. They said they're really 50% full
during the week and then on the weekends 90% maybe. And then you'd have guests
who were actually renting who would you know.
» So yeah, that was what I got. The vigilance should definitely um
» definitely apply to the week to the weekends and holidays and peak periods.
» Yeah, >> I I don't know. It's maybe over
alarming, but it can. We're here to kind of evaluate the worst case scenario. We
don't have to deal with the reality that you do. We can imagine anything. So um
no, that's pretty much about it. Um, on that, I know that that the one street
limit is 72 hours, and I don't think that would apply or be of any kind of
concern. That's the only city rule I could find that would affect that.
» Yeah. The uh parking code is is geared around off streetet. So, you know, any
use, it would be off streetet parking. >> Yeah.
» And I don't see anybody staying for three days off street unless their car
broke down. So, that was it.
And and When these gentlemen have a chance, I would like to hear just a
tight comment on that. >> Mr. Silvin,
» thank you. Um, I took the opportunity Sunday to drive
down in there and I happened to run into a a gentleman pulling his boat
out and he was squaring it away before
um it was a little tight getting by him heading down to the launching area. But
that area uh adjacent to the dock is a big area. I was surprised how big it is.
And and uh I think the amount of parking that they have in there right now uh
depending on how they orient u if they need to to park trailers or anything
like that, they got a lot of room there. So um it's a real clean site. I was
impressed. Thank you,
» Commissioner Williams. >> I have nothing at this time.
» At this time, I will open the item up for public comment.
» Okay.
» Yeah. Come on up. and state your name again.
» Uh my name is Seth Dandridge. Um just on behalf of myself, I was just wondering
about the parking itself. Uh I was wondering is the 41 parking places with
or without boat trailer parking? So is that just by themselves? No trailer
parking included. So single places. So if you actually have boats in there,
trailers in there, it's not going to be 41, right?
» That's correct. Yeah, but they do have >> they do have marked spaces on. So
that 41 if I were if we were to actually include the six on the right side where
they if you look in the picture, you can see a few trailers parking there.
um that still would leave you with enough
parking for you know the the folks that are driving
in to rent. >> I know that people that actually rent
the cottages also launch both there. >> Yeah.
» So they also have trailers >> and then I just I know from running a
rental that um you can have even if you have a requirement for only one vehicle
you can have three people show up for a single jet ski. So, where do the other
two cars park? I was just wondering. >> So, that's part of the condition where
we're saying that um and we've spoke to the applicant about that. Um so, per
like for instance, if someone wanted to come in and rent the
um mass boat, one parking space for the
party, the rental party. >> No, for sure. I was just wondering where
the other cars parked for the family. >> Do they just park in town somewhere
random or >> that's because usually, you know, I get
it, but you can't have a if a full family is coming up here, say there's
nine people getting on the vessel >> onto a pontoon boat.
» Okay. Just just a quick point order. Um we need to address the questions or any
comments directly to the commission and then they can direct staff to respond.
» Sorry. Uh yeah, no, that was just basically my concern was mostly with the
parking because I know it can get pretty crazy with the parking. Um so yeah, just
just making sure that that was not knowing where people were going to
actually park the other vehicles or anything. U like I said, there's going
to probably most likely 100% be more than one vehicle showing up for Pontoon
B on occasions. Even if you have the requirement, they'll still be coming
into town with more than one vehicle. So, where they parked the other vehicle,
I have no idea. That was all all I was saying.
» All right. Thanks. I want to comment on on Mr. Dander's
thing. I I kind of agree with that and that's why I thought there has to be
some kind of procedure in place whether shuttle from Austin Park overflow strict
like off off streetet compliance. There will be a time when they when they hit
peak and there's going to be three cars showing up for a pontoon boat at the
same, you know, that's gonna happen. So, it' be nice if they had procedures in
place. So, when people call for the rental, you can give them a sheet that
says if there's overflow parking, please park here. Don't bring five vehicles,
you get one. I mean, I get told that even when I bring my car in to get work
done, you know, I can't park my wife can't just park our other car there. Um,
bad analogy, but I mean there are limits to parking spaces. So, I thought perhaps
some some simple procedure could avoid that peak problem that Mr. Dandridge was
talking about. And I hope I got your name right.
» Can you state your name, please? Of >> course. I'm Jerome Mane and I'm the
manager at Clear Lake Cottages. Um, so when people we haven't run into the
public yet, but what I was what I would think is that they're either
in town or they're come, you know, they're coming to stay here, so they're
we would instruct them like so they're probably so they're staying somewhere
else. I'd instruct them to come in one car. Um, so they wouldn't be I I don't
see that people I guess people could be coming to town just for the day to rent
the place and then, you know, have to figure out, you know, where to park, but
I think most people are going to be here, you know, either on vacation or
living here. I don't know for sure, but that's that's
my thought. >> If that indeed is part of the procedure
to avoid any chance of overlock on some of those big days, that would seem
» I don't know. Is that difficult to add, sir? to the
» or is it even required? Is that kind of thing you just I I I'm still new to
government. >> I I think um let's let's get all the
comments out and then let's try to address that. I think um I have some
things to add, but we really should provide everyone the three minutes to
talk and then address the question. >> Sounds good.
» I think that's all I have to say about it.
» Okay. Thank you. >> I do have one question.
» Oh, okay. If um on average, would you say how many of
your guests bring their own watercrafts with them who stay in in the cabins?
Uh I would say
like on a busy weekend. Um three or four maybe. Um we only have
three or four slips to rent out. They don't have to rent the slip. they can
store it on the in the overflow parking. Um, but yeah, that's what it that's what
I feel about during the week less. You know, we get a lot of people that are
doing like construction that are staying there for work during the week
» that aren't there for fun. >> Great. Thank you.
» Thanks. >> One more question. Yeah, thank you. Um,
when these people bring their their skidos or what boats or whatever, do
they park the trailers in that lower area adjacent to the dock? Is that where
they park? >> Yes, that's where they park. Yeah.
» Yeah. >> So, a little bit of organization in
there would go a long way, right? >> Yeah, of course. Uh I've been there
almost a year now and I've never There's up to now we were busy last summer.
We've it's never been full >> or close to full that area.
» Thanks. >> You know, that's that's my experience.
» Thank you. >> Thanks.
» Thank you.
» Is there anybody else in chambers if we'd like to speak?
Have we received any written public comments via Q&A function on Zoom?
» We do have a hand raised on the Zoom. Mr. Chair,
which I believe is the applicant, >> Jim Davis.
» So, Mr. Davis, can you hear us?
Can you hear me? Well, barely. >> Okay, give me a second.
Turn this off. Is that better?
» That is
okay. Sorry, I've not had to deal with this particular I had a lot of trouble
getting in. I apologize. Um, like Jerome had stated, we only have
three open slips. Um, the time that we get individuals bringing their own boats
and typically it's usually fishermen um, uh, coming for a tournament.
We may get three. Um, and so there's there's quite a bit of parking there.
Our watercraft sit in the slips in all the other slips
at the location. Um, and so you know, our guests, uh, and
also we're going to set this up on our website.
And so we'll have a the same reservation system as we do for our cottages.
So when someone wants to book one of our watercraft, one of the locals,
um, they're going to be getting information from us in advance. they're
going to be told to minimize and carpool. Um, and so we're we're trust me
when I tell you it is way to our benefit to ensure that our parking never maxes.
Um, we can always park our employees off site. Um, and so we've we're pretty
adept at at making sure that cuz we do have people come and rent half our
cottages or actually all of our cottages. Um, and so managing through
the parking, it's something that Jerome has to do on a on a daily basis. Um,
during the summer on the weekends when it's max,
Sunday through Thursday, we're running 45 to 50% occupancy.
Um, even in the summer. So, I just I wanted to make myself
available to answer questions. I I'm profoundly sorry it I had such a
difficult time getting in.
Well, that's quite all right. Thanks for uh thanks for coming on.
I will now ask the commissioners if there are any further comments for
deliberation on this item.
» Commissioner Sylvia, you got your hand up there.
» Mr. Chair, maybe before you get into that, I guess make a couple of comments
about I mean, there's a lot of discussion about the parking, which I
think >> is appropriate. Um,
a couple of things. I mean, we have, um, you know, our parking standards in
the zoning ordinance, which are in designed and intended to sort of cover
the most likely scenarios for different uses. Um, you know, as an example, just
a a u a restaurant, we normally don't um, you know, figure out like what the
maximum occupancy is and like how many cars that like if three people show up
for one of those tables or whatever, but it's based on that type of use and how
many cars that generally generates, right? So, this is a similar type of
thing. Um, but the main goal in in my view of the
commission is to make sure that this expanded use doesn't cause broader
negative impacts to the community around this facility, right? Um, and you know,
it would be our hope at you know, similar to the property owners that I'm
sure as many days as possible in a year there would be 100% occupancy and
parking would be very difficult around there, right? Um
however um with the parking standards that we have I mean you know we've
permitted them based on that but we that calculation doesn't specifically include
um okay we have 18 units what happens if uh the occupants each show up with two
cars for each of those units right um that would cause a tight issue but our
standards say that each unit has to have one space And then for each 10 units,
you have to have an additional space, right? So they have those in an
additional four spaces. Correct. Um just for the units and that's not including
the overflow parking. So it seems like there would be very few times when
parking would be at such a premium on the site
um that it would cause some significant
conflicts. Now, as the owner kind of alluded to, it's kind of a business
problem for them if their operations create that type of problem on site.
What I think we care about more is does that then begin to overflow into the
community? Are people parking their cars and boat trailers out on the street on a
corner where maybe it's not safe? And that's something that we may then um
need to get involved in. Um, so you know, uh, I guess one other thing
I wanted to point out is essentially the way the conditions are laid out,
they are restricted to having the five um
um, like motorized watercraft, right? And so
they can't suddenly come in next month and add five more because then that is
very clearly going to cause a parking problem. However, having said all that,
if the commission is still concerned about the parking situation, you could
um direct us to add an additional uh question or direct them to provide some
uh you know, say a parking overflow parking plan or something like that.
Sounds like they've already thought about a number of solutions,
but you could um request that that applicant do that and and have it um
reviewed and approved by staff. for I mean you could ask that it come back to
the commission if you want as well but just wanted to kind of give a little bit
of background and throw out a couple of options if you feel like there needs to
be more um you know conditions put into place to
make sure that it doesn't this problem doesn't overflow into the larger
neighborhood. My feeling on that is if indeed you can
talk to each person that's going to rent and tell them bring one car or drop
somebody off or however you limited that. If that's already part of your
practice then I think that question is at least for me is answered.
I drive by there all the time. If it isn't answered we'll see. So
» Mr. Sil I'd like to make a comment on that. I
like I said, I drove down in there and uh um I can't see there being a problem,
but if there were, I would I would assume that it would be in the best
interest of the people who are on duty there to uh figure out a way to make
things as easy as possible for everyone involved. Otherwise, you get a traffic
jam, boats coming in, uh trailers coming out, it would be a nightmare. So, I
think that they'll probably if they have a problem, they'll address it post
haste. That's it. Thank
» I agree. Thank you, sir. Um, I have a motion on item one.
I move to approve conditional use permit COP 2026-05
as well as the categorical exemption CE 2026-05
to include the additional conditions that were mentioned in the staff report.
» I'll second.
» Commissioner Williams >> I.
Commissioner Silva >> I.
» Vice Chair English >> I.
» And Chair Smallley. >> I
passes 40 Z. So, city manager floor or senior planner
Roberts, do you have a report? >> Uh, I don't have too much report. I did
want to make sure and point out that last week we released the public draft
of the environmental impact report for the airport redevelopment project. Um I
think you all should have gotten that via email. If you didn't recall seeing
it, we'll make sure that you get the the link to that. So, this opens the um
initial 45day um comment period on that draft and um
we'll be receiving comments hopefully um incorporating those and then at some
point hopefully sooner rather than later bringing that to the commission for
review. Um we have also considered actually just
having a um no recommended action just kind of a public hearing type of thing
and doing it here in front of the commission to kind of give an initial
presentation to the commission about the project. allow the community to come and
get questions answered while there's um uh you know kind of a a first bite at it
because you know obviously it's a very lengthy document with a lot of studies
and then bring it back for actual hopefully recommended approval at a
later time. So um I think that's the the most significant update I had since the
last meeting. >> Thank you. question and I know my my
colleague Commissioner Counts asked this last week but my boss my wife asked me
to ask about writing. Okay. Um I don't remember what I told
you last time but we have been coordinating with the owner and working
with them and our um retail specialists to try and um help identify some tenants
for them. Um, so, you know, I haven't heard any um, you know, deals are in
place yet, but we're trying to to push folks towards them and and the owner's
been been pretty engaged uh, with us on that. So, he's seems very open to um,
you know, doing his best to accommodate something that the community really
wants there. >> Thank you, Owen.
Any
of the commissioners do any of the commissioners have any
item to report?
» No, not see any uh do any any commissioner have a request for future
agenda items?
All right. Well, thank you to everyone who took the time to attend tonight's
meeting and to those who are watching our meeting on Zoom and YouTube
platforms. Uh meeting there being no further business of the commission, we
are now adjourned at 6:43 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23rd, 2026.
Thank you.