1 00:00:30,510 --> 00:00:36,490 Everybody will give folks another minute or so to arrive and then we'll get started. 2 00:01:19,890 --> 00:01:29,570 All right, well, I know others will be joining as we go. I've heard from three different commissioners 3 00:01:29,570 --> 00:01:38,130 who will be joining somewhat late, but why don't we go ahead and get started? My name is Judge 4 00:01:38,130 --> 00:01:46,410 it's great to see all of you. I'm going to run through the agenda and what you can anticipate for today. 5 00:01:47,410 --> 00:01:54,170 We're going to start off by talking about the 2026 legislative cycle and the bills that relate 6 00:01:54,170 --> 00:02:02,650 to elections and Alex's Alex got it. On the screen is going to make that presentation. 7 00:02:02,650 --> 00:02:12,510 Feel free to ask any questions you have or make any comments about how the legislative cycle went and anything you anticipate in the future. 8 00:02:14,030 --> 00:02:21,850 Then I will do a summary of how the 2026 primary election was conducted. 9 00:02:22,130 --> 00:02:26,090 Show you some statistics and interesting facts about that. 10 00:02:26,090 --> 00:02:36,270 election. And again, you're open to asking any questions or making comments. And then Neil McBurnett, 11 00:02:36,690 --> 00:02:45,190 who does not appear to be on the screen, has time on the agenda to talk about some of the auditing 12 00:02:45,750 --> 00:02:51,790 ideas that he and others have been working on in the state. So he has for a little bit of time on the 13 00:02:51,790 --> 00:02:58,010 then. So he's the last one of the formal speakers. Then we have time for all of you to bring 14 00:02:58,010 --> 00:03:07,050 up new topics if you have anything you want to discuss. And then there is a public portion of the 15 00:03:07,050 --> 00:03:14,910 meeting where the public can make comments and remember that those are reserved for a two minute 16 00:03:14,910 --> 00:03:22,110 comment, period, and try to be conscientious about what people are talking about, and if you're 17 00:03:22,110 --> 00:03:29,210 just making the same comment, the previous comment are made, please understand that we are paying 18 00:03:29,210 --> 00:03:35,810 attention to what people are commenting to. Alright, well why don't we go ahead and get started, 19 00:03:35,890 --> 00:03:42,530 and I'm going to hand it over to Alex, and I think he has a presentation that will load up on the screen. 20 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:55,760 And folks, see that. 21 00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:56,940 Good. 22 00:03:58,260 --> 00:04:00,460 We're just getting back up to my meeting. 23 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:02,920 Then what? 24 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:04,060 I'll hide money. 25 00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:06,200 How it's got our director of government affairs. 26 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:09,970 We just giving a quick overview of the 26th legislative session. 27 00:04:11,500 --> 00:04:17,200 And just highlighting a couple of the bills that primarily had to do with elections, as Judd mentioned. 28 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:21,640 President, under earlier Simpson. Good to see you. But yeah, so the general assembly convened on January 14, adjourned, May 13. There were 633 bills introduced, 3124 of those past. You can see the break down there from the House and Senate and current resolutions. 29 00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:28,700 and then as specifically for elections, there were 17 bills total that I introduced that were 30 00:05:28,700 --> 00:05:34,000 focused on or related to elections and then eight of those tasks and nine of those failed 31 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:38,380 and I will be talking about some of those specifically that did ultimately pass. 32 00:05:41,410 --> 00:05:47,030 So the big one is our modifications to elections bill, hospital 261113, 33 00:05:47,030 --> 00:05:51,290 ultimately known as the cleanup bill, or the omnibus election bill, 34 00:05:52,370 --> 00:05:56,850 pertains a slew of changes and proposals as it relates to elections, 35 00:05:57,910 --> 00:06:02,930 typically this is legislation that all the election stakeholders, advocates, 36 00:06:03,550 --> 00:06:07,890 administrators work together and the majority of the bill tends to be 37 00:06:07,890 --> 00:06:12,310 technical cleanup just fixing kind of makes some tweaks there based on lessons 38 00:06:12,310 --> 00:06:16,070 that we learned or just kind of new things that popped up during previous 39 00:06:16,070 --> 00:06:21,750 cycles as well as some you know policy changes that I will kind of touch on here as well. 40 00:06:22,910 --> 00:06:27,210 So the big one I think is extended voting windows. 41 00:06:28,970 --> 00:06:35,390 These move from 22 days to 29 days as to when county clerks may begin mailing out their ballots. 42 00:06:36,070 --> 00:06:41,830 The idea here was getting in line with some other states around the nation that have longer early 43 00:06:41,830 --> 00:06:47,310 the early voting windows as it relates to mail ballots and then also giving voters more 44 00:06:47,310 --> 00:06:52,810 time to receive their ballots, as well as make sure they get it back, get it in the mail 45 00:06:52,810 --> 00:06:59,370 stream if they need to or more time to find a drop off drop it off there. Or if there's any issues 46 00:06:59,370 --> 00:07:04,010 come up, they have more time to work with a local county clerk to get a replacement ballots 47 00:07:04,010 --> 00:07:09,490 or just make sure they have both ample time and opportunities to vote and troubleshoot 48 00:07:09,490 --> 00:07:16,810 would have thing to do. Along with that, there was also a change to open Dropboxes earlier from 49 00:07:16,810 --> 00:07:22,410 15 to 22 days. This is also, you know, to ensure that voters have aren't sitting on their 50 00:07:22,410 --> 00:07:31,670 ballot longer than they need to. Following that, this is a change there that prohibits any candidates 51 00:07:31,670 --> 00:07:38,010 seeking a third term of the presidency from appearing on Colorado ballots. Colorado statute was 52 00:07:38,010 --> 00:07:44,210 somewhat silence on whether federal and some state candidates to certain extent 53 00:07:46,230 --> 00:07:50,170 if they need to meet all the qualifications as athletes out in the constitution. 54 00:07:50,630 --> 00:07:56,070 And so this is almost a cleanup measure or a technical change just to clarify that every 55 00:07:56,070 --> 00:08:00,210 candidate has to meet the obligations that are stated by their governing statute whether that 56 00:08:00,210 --> 00:08:01,190 or federal. 57 00:08:04,110 --> 00:08:13,130 Another one there is kind of just in response to just concerns of changes or quick 58 00:08:13,130 --> 00:08:17,610 changes to federal election law and how it affects state law and how we run our elections 59 00:08:17,610 --> 00:08:21,490 given that we are. How many days out from the election jump? 60 00:08:24,310 --> 00:08:28,030 We're 82 days. 82 days and so there 61 00:08:28,030 --> 00:08:33,330 tends to be a bit of uncertainty about, you know, if there are any changes at federal law or 62 00:08:33,330 --> 00:08:40,850 kind of programmatic things at the federal level, that color will be able to run the elections 63 00:08:40,850 --> 00:08:49,310 as required by Title 1. And so if something comes up or county clerks and election administrators 64 00:08:49,310 --> 00:08:53,030 in the state are not able to need their statutory obligations to be these recent changes, 65 00:08:53,030 --> 00:09:05,590 makes it clear that the governor has the ability to declare an emergency and we can all work together to ensure that we can run our elections and clients with, you know, state and federal law and put that. 66 00:09:09,380 --> 00:09:10,380 Moving on. 67 00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:21,260 There's a new provision that requires strict retain of custody requirements for election materials in the event of. 68 00:09:21,260 --> 00:09:27,200 of a court order warrants or anything like that, and just makes it clear that folks know 69 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:33,320 if they are being requested to hand over sent election materials or election records 70 00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:38,260 or voting equipment, things like that, that there's a clear process that just laid out 71 00:09:39,120 --> 00:09:47,020 that they know that they have to follow, so things that we kind of saw that what happened in Georgia, there was a lot of confusion about 72 00:09:47,020 --> 00:09:53,500 What records are being requested and where they went and we wanted to make sure that there is a paper trail 73 00:09:53,500 --> 00:09:58,480 So just speak on anything that goes and where it goes as it leads to all types of election documents 74 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:09,660 Or, the statewide voter database, or the non-fidivist. Yeah, database into the statewide voter registration system by July 1, 2021. 75 00:10:10,380 --> 00:10:15,940 This will have, this will be a lot of work to do, but I know folks have been wanting it for a while. 76 00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:19,340 And we'll make our kind of systems a lot better, and all that's in there. 77 00:10:22,460 --> 00:10:28,240 Change the age eligibility requirements for a student election judge from 16 to 15. 78 00:10:29,340 --> 00:10:34,560 allows voters to request time off in order to vote at any time while VFCs are open. 79 00:10:34,820 --> 00:10:40,420 Instead of as current law, the employers will charge to give someone two hours to vote on election day. 80 00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:47,240 And so this gives votes more ability and kind of more ability to actually use vote when it works for them. 81 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:57,580 Creates need reporting requirements for counties with one or more VFCs experience in a way time and access of one hour. 82 00:10:58,740 --> 00:11:01,960 privacy person from being selected as a watcher if the person's been 83 00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:06,600 victim of certain election offenses or of committing or conspiracy to commit 84 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:11,060 certain federal offenses. And lastly, allows an electorate to take printed 85 00:11:11,060 --> 00:11:15,740 or written materials of their choice into a VPSPC as a resource for voting. 86 00:11:27,330 --> 00:11:27,550 Beyond 87 00:11:27,550 --> 00:11:35,310 that, cup more kind of election-related legislation. This one, hospital 26, 10, 23 88 00:11:36,050 --> 00:11:39,230 a political party liability for excess political requirements. 89 00:11:39,430 --> 00:11:45,250 This one in my view was also a bit of a cleanup measure, just clarified that the state party 90 00:11:45,250 --> 00:11:51,390 is responsible and, you know, as to make sure that any request for accessible participation 91 00:11:52,130 --> 00:11:58,870 will be met and it's not a, it's not solely on a volunteer at one of these, you know, 92 00:11:59,130 --> 00:12:02,970 precinct meeting or caucus and it's the analysis on the state party. 93 00:12:05,300 --> 00:12:20,460 House Bill 26, 1038 County Commission of redistricting, this one largely requires if a county nominates there that they use an independent redistricting commission that is not the county commissioners. 94 00:12:20,460 --> 00:12:28,320 That's like the board that they're required to create an independent body similar to that we have for state and federal races. 95 00:12:28,320 --> 00:12:29,460 for Burberry District 96 00:12:32,250 --> 00:12:34,150 and 97 00:12:36,580 --> 00:12:41,180 Hospital 26, 10, 84 voter transparency and ballot measures. 98 00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:47,340 This, there was a similar measure back in, I think, 21, that requires additional required 99 00:12:47,340 --> 00:12:49,980 language for ballot measures to further inform voters. 100 00:12:50,320 --> 00:12:55,900 This is another one like that where part of the Fifth Impact Statement and ballot information 101 00:12:55,900 --> 00:13:01,000 booklet and three four says the initiative measures that require state spending, so ones like 102 00:13:01,000 --> 00:13:03,100 I think, as initiative 350, 103 00:13:05,180 --> 00:13:08,280 and a couple of years back, that's to make sure that the measures 104 00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:14,480 states where the money will be coming from in which top three program areas will be affected by that. 105 00:13:18,300 --> 00:13:20,260 House full 26, 1293, 106 00:13:22,440 --> 00:13:24,940 modernization of requirements for ballot information booklet. 107 00:13:25,860 --> 00:13:29,460 As I mentioned in the note, primarily it's a clean and measure, codifying certain 108 00:13:29,460 --> 00:13:35,820 current practices that LCS does with the blue book and just makes it a bit more modern, 109 00:13:36,020 --> 00:13:42,040 at least the statute. But voters should not see any significant changes to how the blue books 110 00:13:42,040 --> 00:13:44,120 pertains to them and it doesn't look like that. 111 00:13:46,360 --> 00:13:50,040 And House Bill 26, 13, 20, accessible language 112 00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:56,420 set. That should be a delicate title requirements. This one is in response to a lot of folks. 113 00:13:57,280 --> 00:14:03,520 the shared common feeling that ballot titles are confusing to voters and so this largely 114 00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:08,620 encourages title board to use language that is accessible and more widely understood to 115 00:14:08,620 --> 00:14:14,560 someone who is reading that measure at any grade level effectively. Additionally, current 116 00:14:14,560 --> 00:14:22,580 law requires certain language be placed in certain places in the ballot title and this allows 117 00:14:22,580 --> 00:14:29,620 title board to move that around, place it anywhere in the title with the theory being they 118 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:11,700 And then lastly, Senate bill 2659, multiple elected offices, prohibited for general assembly, this just privacy member of the general assembly can hold any other elected offices while serving. 119 00:15:13,420 --> 00:15:26,600 And there are certain exemptions in there, for special districts, as I mentioned, and kind of some of the other exemptions kind of contemplate if there was a change in election versus due to like a vacancy nomination or term ending support. 120 00:15:27,280 --> 00:15:33,120 stuff like that. And so this is largely a general assembly measure. This does not affect 121 00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:40,240 candidates, the or axis of the ballots. This is strictly enforced, so to speak, by the general 122 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:40,660 assembly. 123 00:15:44,700 --> 00:15:49,100 And those are the ones I've highlighted here, but I'm happy to take any questions 124 00:15:49,100 --> 00:15:53,460 or kind of open this up if there's any other comments on some of the bills that we discussed. 125 00:15:53,460 --> 00:15:54,200 We've 126 00:16:06,550 --> 00:16:12,890 done a couple of handrails. If you just want to shout out your question, that'd be great. 127 00:16:16,380 --> 00:16:21,000 Hi, I'm a quick question, and the apologies if you covered this earlier. 128 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:27,060 When do these go into effect? Are they for the general or are they different timelines? 129 00:16:30,500 --> 00:16:33,980 Yeah, so it depends on the specific bill itself. 130 00:16:34,700 --> 00:16:39,080 The big election bill that I covered at the beginning, that has various timelines. 131 00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:44,240 that went initially had a safety clause for the build generally, but certain provisions, such 132 00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:51,640 as the extended mail ballot times, that was that to take effect after the primary election, 133 00:16:52,100 --> 00:16:56,620 because when the bill passed, though, it had been too close for the counties to work with 134 00:16:56,620 --> 00:17:02,700 the vendors, to just make sure they can apply with that. And so that has varying effective dates throughout 135 00:17:02,700 --> 00:17:08,300 the build. And as far as the other ones, I don't remember off top my head, which had a safety 136 00:17:08,300 --> 00:17:14,960 clause or petition clause in that. But if it had a petition clause, everything, everything 137 00:17:14,960 --> 00:17:22,720 with a petition clause went into effect, I think yesterday, two days ago, and so if not 138 00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:29,020 in the bill specific about when it took effect either immediately or some other time in the 139 00:17:29,020 --> 00:17:29,340 future. 140 00:17:33,140 --> 00:17:39,860 And I note that there's a question in the audience. I just heads up that the audience 141 00:17:39,860 --> 00:17:48,640 will have an opportunity to do a two minute address to the commission, but it's not a back and 142 00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:55,920 forth question answer period. So if you'd like to make a comment later, when we open the 143 00:17:55,920 --> 00:18:02,540 mics, just feel free to raise your hand at that time. Any other questions or comments for Alex 144 00:18:02,540 --> 00:18:04,080 among the commissioners 145 00:18:11,570 --> 00:18:13,410 and do not apologize, Christina. 146 00:18:15,690 --> 00:18:32,030 All right, well, I think we've added a couple of new people, that's great, and we, I know we're having, we'll have more people as we go because there will be a couple of people who weren't able to attend early on. 147 00:18:32,850 --> 00:18:38,470 But why don't we switch to my presentation, which is on the 2026 primary election? 148 00:18:38,470 --> 00:18:41,170 Let me get that up, 149 00:19:07,120 --> 00:19:07,640 you know, 150 00:19:11,940 --> 00:19:15,440 hold on just like, you won't, uh, 151 00:19:38,160 --> 00:19:40,240 there we go, that's gonna work. 152 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:26,640 All right, so let me walk you through our 2026 primary election. I've got a bunch of sort of the normal kinds of statistics, but we have had a couple of times in recent elections when you all have asked for some special statistics and I did take note of that and have added some of those to this presentation. 153 00:20:26,640 --> 00:20:33,680 and so hopefully I've addressed some of the questions, but I always like to talk at the beginning 154 00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:39,560 about voter registration because voter registration at least in a state that has voter registration 155 00:20:39,560 --> 00:20:47,320 is the lifeblood of a successful election. So here are the nuts and bolts of voter registration 156 00:20:47,320 --> 00:20:54,500 in the state of Colorado. We have both electronic and paper ways that you can register to vote, 157 00:20:54,500 --> 00:21:00,580 most of our registrations and updates occur electronically. Our automatic voter registration 158 00:21:00,580 --> 00:21:08,460 has been pretty extraordinarily successful at sort of meeting our voters where they are 159 00:21:08,460 --> 00:21:14,300 and getting registrations and updates through a natural course of your interactions with the 160 00:21:14,300 --> 00:21:24,380 government when you get a driver's license or update that driver's license. So that's what you 161 00:21:24,380 --> 00:21:31,160 a leader on that over half of our voter registrations and updates occur just naturally over 162 00:21:31,160 --> 00:21:37,040 the course of a person's interaction with the government and are not based solely on trying 163 00:21:37,040 --> 00:21:45,300 to do that for an election. However, if you want to make a registration change or you want 164 00:21:45,300 --> 00:21:52,440 to register to vote for the first time, you can use online voter registration and I just wanted 165 00:21:52,440 --> 00:21:57,900 the note that there are two ways to access that, both using your driver's license number, 166 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:08,480 but also your Social Security number, 98.81% of our voter registration file, our voters have 167 00:22:08,480 --> 00:22:19,380 a DL on file, and then 99.5% essentially of our voter registration files have a Social Security 168 00:22:19,380 --> 00:22:27,680 number on them. So, a very, very high percentage of our population can access that through online 169 00:22:27,680 --> 00:22:34,180 voter registration, access their voter registration file. And that information on the file allows 170 00:22:34,180 --> 00:22:42,400 us to do a very good list maintenance on those files. We also do Section 7, NVRA compliance, 171 00:22:43,320 --> 00:22:48,920 which is registrations while you're receiving government services. And then it's not unusual at 172 00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:56,200 that we will get online voter registration drives, so these are outside groups that are trying 173 00:22:56,200 --> 00:23:01,300 to encourage people to register to vote or update. And then we have paperways that people 174 00:23:01,300 --> 00:23:07,540 can register. I wouldn't note that now over the years this has become less and less of the focus 175 00:23:07,540 --> 00:23:12,660 of our voters were now under 10% of our registrations coming in by paper. 176 00:23:14,990 --> 00:23:16,130 Just to give you some 177 00:23:16,130 --> 00:23:22,690 numbers from this year. This is the new registrations that we're getting through the DMV. 178 00:23:23,570 --> 00:23:30,450 I just want to emphasize the way that that works and you all probably have driver's licenses or 179 00:23:30,450 --> 00:23:46,110 state IDs, so you have had this experience. But when you go and do the DMV to get a driver's license 180 00:23:46,110 --> 00:23:54,550 It's all about identity and you must stand in front of another government official and produce those to get a driver's license 181 00:23:54,550 --> 00:23:59,830 That's why we feel like and I think pretty much every election and professional feels like 182 00:23:59,830 --> 00:24:07,070 That interaction is the best that's sort of the holy grail of getting very good voter registration data 183 00:24:07,850 --> 00:24:12,270 And making sure that we know exactly who we're talking to and 184 00:24:12,270 --> 00:24:18,650 And for us, we are average in around 14,000 new registrations each month, sometimes that number 185 00:24:18,650 --> 00:24:23,070 is higher, especially in the summer, and it's lower in the winter, especially February 186 00:24:23,070 --> 00:24:29,990 with the fewer days, so that this is a trend line that we see across every year. 187 00:24:30,770 --> 00:24:37,430 And when we first started the, like, purely automatic voter registration in 2020, 2020 doesn't 188 00:24:37,430 --> 00:24:39,650 really count because it was such an odd year. 189 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:12,220 And that's just the subject of the fact that we have more people who are 15, 16, 17 years of age, and then more people who are moving to the state. So these numbers are gradually taking up. 190 00:25:12,660 --> 00:25:24,380 Okay, some broader voter registration numbers. This, these sets of bars, the bluest of the bars being the most recent and the lightest of the bars being the furthest back. 191 00:25:24,380 --> 00:25:28,440 show our voter registration trends over the years. 192 00:25:29,420 --> 00:25:34,260 I always need to do a quick definition of what it is to be an active voter, 193 00:25:34,480 --> 00:25:36,400 and what it is to be an inactive voter, 194 00:25:36,580 --> 00:25:38,540 so an active voter in the state of Colorado, 195 00:25:38,740 --> 00:25:41,900 and frankly, 44 states around the country. 196 00:25:42,900 --> 00:25:48,660 Our voters where we have a good faith belief that the voter lives 197 00:25:48,660 --> 00:25:52,260 at the address that they have on file or resides at that address. 198 00:25:52,260 --> 00:25:57,760 So, those active voter numbers, you can see, have 199 00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:00,960 trended up about a million people over the last decade, 200 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:05,280 corresponding to the growth and population in the state of Colorado. 201 00:26:05,520 --> 00:26:09,260 And then also Colorado is a comparatively young state, 202 00:26:10,820 --> 00:26:13,340 compared to, especially many states in the north. 203 00:26:13,980 --> 00:26:16,460 And so our population is younger, and we tend to have 204 00:26:16,920 --> 00:26:20,940 more children that become adults. 205 00:26:20,940 --> 00:26:24,780 And so that number is related to that. 206 00:26:24,860 --> 00:26:28,760 An inactive voter is a voter who formerly was an active voter, 207 00:26:29,520 --> 00:26:33,180 but when we sent them a ballot or we sent them some other mailing, 208 00:26:33,780 --> 00:26:36,180 that mailing was rejected as undeliverable. 209 00:26:36,520 --> 00:26:39,200 And that confirmation mailing was sent to confirm 210 00:26:39,740 --> 00:26:42,580 that that person no longer lives at that address, 211 00:26:42,660 --> 00:26:44,260 and that comes back as undeliverable. 212 00:26:44,560 --> 00:26:47,540 Now we know that we have a person who's moved, 213 00:26:47,940 --> 00:26:49,180 and we don't know where they moved. 214 00:26:49,180 --> 00:26:53,300 So we're going to inactivate that voter registration until 215 00:26:53,300 --> 00:26:56,620 such time as we learn where they've moved in the state. 216 00:26:57,020 --> 00:26:59,280 And if we never learn where they've moved, 217 00:26:59,740 --> 00:27:01,820 then we're going to eventually cancel them. 218 00:27:01,840 --> 00:27:04,480 And that's going to happen over the course of two general elections, 219 00:27:04,800 --> 00:27:08,500 which so typically we're talking about four years or thereabouts, 220 00:27:08,740 --> 00:27:11,120 where somebody is in this inactive status. 221 00:27:11,500 --> 00:27:14,240 And then eventually they become a canceled voter. 222 00:27:15,300 --> 00:27:17,880 We also, on this page, have pre-registered voters. 223 00:27:17,880 --> 00:27:24,360 these are registered voters who are below the age of 18. So they are not officially registered, 224 00:27:24,600 --> 00:27:31,760 they are pre-registered. And that number has been pretty steady in the 60,000 or so over the 225 00:27:31,760 --> 00:27:39,000 last several years. But it changed this last year when we moved up to 104,000. And that is because 226 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:45,740 we added one more year where a person could be registered of a prior to terminating teams. So we added 227 00:27:45,740 --> 00:27:52,400 15-year-olds, you might ask for self, why on earth would we add 15-year-olds? Well, we added 15-year-olds 228 00:27:52,400 --> 00:27:59,360 because there are a lot of people in the state who will get a driver's permit at 15, but then 229 00:27:59,360 --> 00:28:07,300 not have an official DMV transaction until after they're 18. And so we wanted to catch that group of people who 230 00:28:07,300 --> 00:28:13,840 were 15 so that we could have that government interaction and get them registered to vote or at least 231 00:28:13,840 --> 00:28:19,540 in this case pre-register. So that's why that number took that. But we have around 100,000 people 232 00:28:19,540 --> 00:28:28,680 who are pre-registered right now. Just a interesting note that the vast majority of those, as you'll 233 00:28:28,680 --> 00:28:37,040 see with a remainder of the Colorado voter population, are unafiliated, but among those who are 234 00:28:37,040 --> 00:28:41,400 affiliated, slightly more of them are affiliated as Republicans than as Democrats. 235 00:28:42,340 --> 00:28:46,620 So that's a trend line that's somewhat different than what's happening in the state. 236 00:28:48,080 --> 00:28:51,080 This is party registration over that same period of time. 237 00:28:51,520 --> 00:28:53,640 So I literally pulled this from last month. 238 00:28:54,340 --> 00:28:59,140 So we are now over 50% on affiliated in the state of Colorado. 239 00:29:00,040 --> 00:29:04,540 22.5% Republican and 24.8% Democrat. 240 00:29:04,540 --> 00:29:15,560 If you go back 12 years to 2014, we were a plurality Republican state at 37 percent, 32 for Democrats and 29 for unaffiliated. 241 00:29:16,220 --> 00:29:24,040 But the unaffiliated number has really rocketed up over the last 12 years, and there's the other trends that are happening through those populations. 242 00:29:25,840 --> 00:29:32,320 And then, by the way, the other category is also growing and if you think about it in terms 243 00:29:32,320 --> 00:29:39,820 of its specific increase, it's almost doubled over the last 10 years, people choosing one 244 00:29:39,820 --> 00:29:43,380 of the non-traditional political parties. 245 00:29:44,720 --> 00:29:46,780 All right, let's shift to the primary. 246 00:29:47,740 --> 00:29:55,380 So this is where we started. These were our voter count at the beginning of the election. 247 00:29:56,100 --> 00:29:59,900 We had 1,7,781 Democrats. 248 00:30:00,050 --> 00:30:13,270 Are the turnouts of the 177,000 Democrats, 486,000 of them voted over about 48 percent. Of the Republicans, 249 00:30:14,550 --> 00:30:29,330 909,000 active voters, 371,000 voted, which was about 41 percent. And are affiliated, who had to pick a ballot, were, again, about 2,582,000 of them voted. 250 00:30:29,330 --> 00:30:37,410 around 28%. Of the people who were registered to vote as a libertarian, 10% of them voted, 251 00:30:37,730 --> 00:30:43,410 and of the 30,000 who are registered as unity party members, about 6%. 252 00:30:44,330 --> 00:30:52,110 Now I have to, so this is one of those references I made earlier. In the past one of these meetings, 253 00:30:52,230 --> 00:30:59,050 I was asked, hey, can you show me parties switching during this time? So do we have a lot of 254 00:30:59,050 --> 00:31:04,510 Democrats switching to Republican or Republicans switching to Democrat, you could also have an 255 00:31:04,510 --> 00:31:10,070 unafiliated picking a party which we do occasionally, but you don't have to do that during that period 256 00:31:10,070 --> 00:31:16,830 of time because you'll get both ballots. But this question's come up so I hadn't pulled the information. 257 00:31:18,570 --> 00:31:26,330 You can see here that the left-hand column is what the previous party was, the across column, 258 00:31:26,330 --> 00:31:35,630 left to right column is the new party. So there were about 1,000 new Democrats during this 259 00:31:35,630 --> 00:31:44,350 period, but if you look at the right-hand column, they lost about 789 people. So if you look 260 00:31:44,350 --> 00:31:51,710 at that 1,07 and the 789, there was about a 200-person difference where the Democratic party 261 00:31:51,710 --> 00:31:59,710 added 200 voters. On Affiliated interestingly was 1372, but if you look at the right column, 262 00:31:59,810 --> 00:32:05,330 it's 1370. So there was basically a net wash of on Affiliated people switching back and 263 00:32:05,330 --> 00:32:11,550 forth between having a party designation or not. And then on the Republican side, the Republican 264 00:32:11,550 --> 00:32:21,250 Party gained 505, but lost 702. So that they were down about 200 voters. But you can see that 265 00:32:21,250 --> 00:32:30,590 you go like specifically tap into the given columns. There were 100 Republicans who switched to 266 00:32:30,590 --> 00:32:38,130 the Democratic Party and there were 66 Democrats that switched to the Republican Party. That's 267 00:32:38,130 --> 00:32:43,890 an often a question we get. Turns out there's not a lot of switching that goes on. This is in 268 00:32:43,890 --> 00:32:50,550 the month prior to and during a primary election. So you would think like the prime time when you 269 00:32:50,550 --> 00:32:56,990 see people switching and of course there's a deadline in there but you would think that that would be 270 00:32:56,990 --> 00:33:02,250 when you would see switching and there's really just not a lot of switching. The biggest switches 271 00:33:02,250 --> 00:33:11,290 were the unaffiliated who were switching to both parties but it seems like about a two and a half to 272 00:33:11,290 --> 00:33:20,530 one margin to the Democratic Party. Any questions? I'll stop right there because there's a lot of 273 00:33:20,530 --> 00:33:22,450 any questions about that one. 274 00:33:24,720 --> 00:33:26,180 And we can always come back to it, finally. 275 00:33:28,540 --> 00:33:29,360 All right, we'll just 276 00:33:29,360 --> 00:33:35,980 keep going forward. So the breakdown of unafiliated voters, so of that group of unafiliated voters, 277 00:33:36,100 --> 00:33:45,260 that 580,000, 418,000 of them picked a Democratic ballot, and 164,000 of them picked a Republican 278 00:33:45,260 --> 00:33:53,760 not, so it's about 72 to 28%. And 103 of them picked a unity ballot. You might think 279 00:33:53,760 --> 00:33:57,360 to yourself a way to make it happen to the libertarians, while the libertarians 280 00:33:57,360 --> 00:34:06,380 when they designated themselves for a primary, they closed the right of unafiliated to participate 281 00:34:06,380 --> 00:34:12,160 in their election. So they said, no, we don't want unafiliated to participate in our election, 282 00:34:12,160 --> 00:34:18,460 which as a third party they are permitted to do. So that's what they did. So they did not permit 283 00:34:18,460 --> 00:34:27,940 any Democrats or any unafiliated, unafiliated, to be able to switch out like the Democrat and Republican cards did. 284 00:34:30,430 --> 00:34:36,110 All right, so this is the overall numbers of accepted ballots. I don't know, I lost some graphics there. 285 00:34:36,110 --> 00:34:43,870 This is, you can see that overall we had 535,000 votes for the Republican, a Republican 286 00:34:43,870 --> 00:34:49,790 card, so a Republican ballot, and 904,000 Democratic cards were voted. 287 00:34:51,930 --> 00:34:58,690 I'm going to go through, I have these sort of heat map slides, again, sort of a different 288 00:34:58,690 --> 00:34:59,970 way of viewing some of this. 289 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:29,820 And some of it, I'm going back to the beginning, but you'll kind of see where I'm going. So this is the number of active voters across counties. Often people don't know this, but El Paso County is the most populous county. Both in terms of raw population, but also in terms of registered and active voters. They have over 500,000 active voters, Denver is number two, at 460, 4000. And then Jefferson County in a Rapo County, 290 00:35:29,820 --> 00:35:40,370 or three and four. If you look at actual votes cast in that sort of heat map review, Jefferson 291 00:35:40,370 --> 00:35:44,430 County had the highest note, I'm sorry, Denver County had the highest and then followed by 292 00:35:44,430 --> 00:35:52,450 Jefferson County and El Paso County. And again, sort of pretty closely map matches where we have 293 00:35:52,450 --> 00:35:57,870 active voters. Let's look at percentage, though. So this is the accepted ballot percentage 294 00:35:58,690 --> 00:36:05,930 cross the counties for the states. I'll just let you know information that's coming 295 00:36:05,930 --> 00:36:12,070 on a later slide, which is the overall percentage turnout was 36% of active 296 00:36:12,070 --> 00:36:18,410 voters. So anytime you see a county less than 36.5, they were below the average. 297 00:36:19,050 --> 00:36:24,790 Anything above is above the average. We had a couple of counties with really stand out. 298 00:36:24,790 --> 00:36:31,030 Turn out Jackson County's kind of the one that stands out as the darkest on the screen 299 00:36:31,030 --> 00:36:38,310 and then Washington, Kyua, Rio Blanco. I would note for those long-time listeners, 300 00:36:38,670 --> 00:36:45,670 first-time colors, mineral county, almost always wins this race. They almost always have the 301 00:36:45,670 --> 00:36:53,030 highest turnout in mineral minerals down in the southwest kind of cornerish. They are six in this 302 00:36:53,030 --> 00:37:00,730 So, I am going to call Erin Witz and ask her what's going on in the mineral county that she has given up her throne. 303 00:37:01,630 --> 00:37:10,210 But there were clearly some very interested voters in many of the counties that were mentioning here. 304 00:37:10,630 --> 00:37:17,770 And turnout was pretty good across much of the metro as well, in some of the more populous counties. 305 00:37:17,770 --> 00:37:22,270 But we did see quite low turnout in Adams County, 306 00:37:22,510 --> 00:37:29,590 Weld County, Morgan County, and that pulled down the state quite a bit. 307 00:37:33,050 --> 00:37:39,490 Let's talk about in-person numbers, so in-person we had about 24,000 people vote in-person. 308 00:37:40,350 --> 00:37:46,070 The largest county in terms of in-person votes was Denver and it wasn't even close. 309 00:37:46,070 --> 00:37:57,070 They had twice as many in-person ballots cast as any other county in the state and followed by Jefferson and then El Paso County. 310 00:37:57,510 --> 00:38:05,630 Again, I can do this by percentage. So this is the percentage turnout of in-person votes cast for that county. 311 00:38:06,470 --> 00:38:15,650 We would typically see around 1.5% stay wide in this election we were 1.7% so slightly higher 312 00:38:15,650 --> 00:38:16,790 than we typically would. 313 00:38:16,810 --> 00:38:23,750 What that means is 98.3% voted a mail ballot that was mailed to them or perhaps they came 314 00:38:23,750 --> 00:38:30,950 in and got it in person but chances are it was mailed to them and then 1.7% voted in person 315 00:38:31,590 --> 00:38:36,650 Denver County was very high this year. I think there was a lot of activism among younger 316 00:38:36,650 --> 00:38:40,830 voters and younger voters tend to be the group that votes in person at the higher 317 00:38:40,830 --> 00:38:44,990 percentage. But you can see there are other counties where there was a pretty high 318 00:38:44,990 --> 00:38:49,190 percentage of in-person voters. Lake County had a very high percentage. I'm gonna 319 00:38:49,190 --> 00:38:55,030 guess why Lake County was a little different than we would typically see. And that 320 00:38:55,030 --> 00:38:59,530 was because they had a very dangerous situation there with a fire that was right 321 00:38:59,530 --> 00:39:06,290 across the ridge from them, and at times during the election cycle was as close to say three to five miles. 322 00:39:07,890 --> 00:39:17,970 And my guess is that they had some displaced population in that county that was taking the opportunity to vote in person because they didn't have access to their mailbox. 323 00:39:19,590 --> 00:39:25,090 That's probably also the case down in San Miguel County, where they also had some buyers. 324 00:40:01,550 --> 00:40:18,570 Okay, so this in person number, I mentioned was about 24,000, it's 24,681, that's for an average of 1.71, if you think in terms of did this voter vote a Democratic ballot or did this voter vote a Republican ballot? 325 00:40:18,890 --> 00:40:26,990 Again, not necessarily registered Democrats and registered voters because unafiliated could vote one or either of the ballots. 326 00:40:26,990 --> 00:40:31,690 but if you just broke it down in terms of what ballot was cast, 327 00:40:32,870 --> 00:40:35,510 slightly higher percentage of democratic ballots 328 00:40:35,510 --> 00:40:38,670 were cast in person than Republican ballots, 329 00:40:38,730 --> 00:40:40,210 we're casting person. 330 00:40:43,640 --> 00:40:46,360 This is the famous hockey stick slide. 331 00:40:47,060 --> 00:40:49,140 It's not as much a hockey stick this time. 332 00:40:49,180 --> 00:40:50,020 I don't know, I don't know, 333 00:40:50,080 --> 00:40:51,600 I don't think about what that image looks like 334 00:40:51,600 --> 00:40:53,620 and see if I can come up with a new image, 335 00:40:54,060 --> 00:40:55,820 or a new, new framing of it. 336 00:40:55,820 --> 00:41:06,760 But it's we did have a lot of activity comparatively on the Monday and Tuesday of election 337 00:41:06,760 --> 00:41:12,360 week instead of solely on election day, and because of that, you know, we picked up quite 338 00:41:12,360 --> 00:41:19,740 a bit in that Monday prior to election day, but overall, that's the 24,685. 339 00:41:19,740 --> 00:41:27,420 I would just note that there are often discussions and, you know, not in this, you know, 340 00:41:27,560 --> 00:41:33,340 celebratory group here, but among others who are less sophisticated in elections, who believe 341 00:41:33,340 --> 00:41:41,620 that having the same day registration will open us up to potential voter fraud, because 342 00:41:41,620 --> 00:41:47,160 there will be large groups of people who will come in to register for the first time and vote 343 00:41:47,160 --> 00:41:50,360 on using vaporities and so forth. 344 00:41:51,240 --> 00:41:53,340 This number that you're seeing on the screen, 345 00:41:54,300 --> 00:41:56,420 comparatively given different elections 346 00:41:56,420 --> 00:42:00,240 that have different numbers is pretty consistent with what 347 00:42:00,240 --> 00:42:02,700 we see, which is a very low percentage 348 00:42:02,700 --> 00:42:08,720 of our voters coming in to register new during the election. 349 00:42:09,840 --> 00:42:12,120 If they are coming in to do anything to their file, 350 00:42:12,240 --> 00:42:13,820 they're updating, and then they're voting. 351 00:42:14,420 --> 00:42:21,440 But most people who come and go to a VSPC on election day or before, they are just there 352 00:42:21,440 --> 00:42:22,120 to vote in person. 353 00:42:22,360 --> 00:42:27,020 Because I wanted to vote in person, and that our state law allows that. 354 00:42:27,520 --> 00:42:34,800 So in this particular election, we had 458 people registered to vote for the first time during 355 00:42:34,800 --> 00:42:40,360 the election during the active time of early voting in election day, and around 5,000 people 356 00:42:40,360 --> 00:42:45,140 made an update to their record, that's usually where they come in and they say, 357 00:42:45,200 --> 00:42:50,020 hey, what happened? I didn't get my mail ballot and they looked them up and they say, well, 358 00:42:50,220 --> 00:42:55,500 what's your address and the person says, I live at 202 L Street and they say, well, we have you 359 00:42:55,500 --> 00:43:00,900 at 101 Main Street. Ah, I moved a couple months ago. Ah, that's why you didn't get your ballot. 360 00:43:01,200 --> 00:43:05,960 Let's get you changed so we'll get you back. So that's usually the way that that works. That's 361 00:43:05,960 --> 00:43:12,080 those 5,000 come from. And then around 20,000 people just wanted to vote in person. And they 362 00:43:12,080 --> 00:43:19,600 received a ballot, they received a ballot of correct address, but they just chose to go in and vote 363 00:43:19,600 --> 00:43:22,900 at their local closest via SPC. 364 00:43:24,920 --> 00:43:27,940 All right, so let's talk about cures for a second. This is another 365 00:43:27,940 --> 00:43:34,220 thing that you have often asked me about, and I've been underwhelming in my response, so I wanted 366 00:43:34,220 --> 00:43:35,520 to give you some more statistics. 367 00:43:37,380 --> 00:43:41,980 So we had statewide about 15,500 ballots 368 00:43:41,980 --> 00:43:43,520 that could have been cured. 369 00:43:44,300 --> 00:43:46,680 So we reject for various reasons. 370 00:43:47,220 --> 00:43:50,120 The majority of the rejection reasons are curable. 371 00:43:50,520 --> 00:43:54,060 That means somebody's signature on the back of that envelope 372 00:43:54,060 --> 00:43:57,120 doesn't match closely enough with the signature we have 373 00:43:57,120 --> 00:43:59,160 on file and so we have to reject it. 374 00:43:59,540 --> 00:44:01,880 Or somebody's signature line is blank 375 00:44:01,880 --> 00:44:03,140 on the back of that ballot. 376 00:44:03,140 --> 00:44:12,140 And so we don't have a signature to compare to that's another curable mistake and then the last one is we have some voters not a lot 377 00:44:12,140 --> 00:44:19,060 But we have some voters who are ID deficient. They don't have an ID on their file and so in order to vote their mail mail 378 00:44:19,060 --> 00:44:25,780 Now they have to produce a copy of their ID. That's a pretty labor intensive process and a lot of those get rejected 379 00:44:26,820 --> 00:44:32,280 Because you know doing a photocopy of an ID is kind of painful for that reason 380 00:44:32,280 --> 00:44:37,260 those are often rejected. We have to go back to them again and ask for another ID. That's another 381 00:44:37,260 --> 00:44:45,520 curable option. So those three are the typical curable amounts. You can see that we had around 2300 382 00:44:46,080 --> 00:44:53,920 in Al Paso County that could have been cured. We had around 1700 in Denver that could have been 383 00:44:53,920 --> 00:44:59,960 and a rapoh about 1400 and so forth. So these are all in the... 384 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:14,920 All four of those counties have fewer than 1,000 registered voters. It's, you know, the case that that population doesn't change a lot and we're unsupervised by the fact that there are not a lot of cures in those counties. 385 00:45:15,540 --> 00:45:21,940 But let me give you the percentage cure for the counties that have cures. 386 00:45:22,900 --> 00:45:41,180 So, of those counties, overall, we cured around 35%, 35%, I think it's actually 36%, 36% is very typical for when we start with a body of 15,500 people. 387 00:45:41,240 --> 00:45:46,960 We would expect that around 6,000 of those people would cure. That's very typical, and that's what we saw in this election. 388 00:45:48,120 --> 00:45:53,340 Some of the counties that are standouts here, again counties with very small populations 389 00:45:53,340 --> 00:45:56,800 all they have to have is a couple of people cure and their numbers are very high. 390 00:45:57,520 --> 00:46:04,400 But in the Metro, El Paso County was slightly below the average, Denver again also slightly 391 00:46:04,400 --> 00:46:05,260 below the average. 392 00:46:05,400 --> 00:46:10,760 But then we had some that were above the average, like Jefferson County, Mason County was 393 00:46:10,760 --> 00:46:12,020 slightly above the average. 394 00:46:12,600 --> 00:46:22,820 So, we don't really have a good handle on what's the driving force of cures, other than close races. 395 00:46:23,660 --> 00:46:26,000 And we didn't really have a lot of close races this time. 396 00:46:27,700 --> 00:46:30,700 So, we have no idea why some of this is the way it is. 397 00:46:31,000 --> 00:46:35,060 But we just make the cure options available to people so that they can do. 398 00:46:36,720 --> 00:47:02,520 provisional ballots. We had 34 provisional ballots cast in the 2026 state primary. Seven of those were accepted and 27 of them were rejected. Again, this is pretty typical. We usually go 3 to 1, rejected over accepted and then we had one of those ballots was a person I don't actually know the backstory on this but I can imagine. 399 00:47:02,520 --> 00:47:08,860 It was a person who was not registered, could not register, but insisted on voting, so they 400 00:47:08,860 --> 00:47:12,640 were issued a provisional ballot that was merely rejected, even though they could 401 00:47:12,640 --> 00:47:14,620 actually fill out the form. 402 00:47:16,440 --> 00:47:18,140 Why would we issue a provisional ballot? 403 00:47:18,400 --> 00:47:25,120 Lots of these are, I'm in my RV, I'm driving across the country, I'm in Colorado today. 404 00:47:25,520 --> 00:47:28,200 Hey, it's election day, I should go vote. 405 00:47:28,200 --> 00:47:34,320 Well, you're not a resident of Colorado, and you have no basis to vote in the Colorado election, 406 00:47:34,700 --> 00:47:39,320 but if you want to insist and fill out the form, you can do that. We'll just reject your ballot. 407 00:47:40,020 --> 00:47:48,900 So that's a lot of it. Only the small category of, I forgot my ID when I came in the vote in person, 408 00:47:49,780 --> 00:47:54,820 I'm going to do a provisional, and then I'm going to provide an ID later, are the ones that are accepted. 409 00:47:58,370 --> 00:48:07,170 Okay, and then Canvas board, so this is another thing that I've been asked about in the past, so we wanted to create a slide for you. 410 00:48:07,470 --> 00:48:13,250 In this election, 59 of our counties unanimously approved their Canvas report. 411 00:48:14,010 --> 00:48:18,650 Five counties did not get a unanimous sign off on the Canvas report. 412 00:48:19,290 --> 00:48:23,430 Those counties are the many of the metro gangs, 413 00:48:24,410 --> 00:48:27,810 Harapaho Boulder, Douglas, El Paso, and Jefferson. 414 00:48:29,070 --> 00:48:33,510 In each of those cases, a Republican representative to the canvas board 415 00:48:33,510 --> 00:48:38,230 with help there approval, so they all pass to one, except for Douglas. 416 00:48:38,730 --> 00:48:44,950 Douglas, I believe, is the only county in the state that has more than three members of a canvas board. 417 00:48:45,210 --> 00:48:48,630 They have a five person canvas board, so they have two Democrats, two Republicans, 418 00:48:48,630 --> 00:48:55,750 comes in the county clerk. And in Douglas County, one of the Republican Canvas Board members 419 00:48:55,750 --> 00:49:00,830 signed the Canvas, but the other one did not. So they had a 401 as opposed to these two ones 420 00:49:00,830 --> 00:49:18,610 that I mentioned above. The five counties not signing, it's become kind of typical. This is not 421 00:49:18,610 --> 00:49:22,450 in each given election, where the Canvas Board doesn't sign off. 422 00:49:23,890 --> 00:49:26,930 They often will say, we're going to write a minority report. 423 00:50:00,050 --> 00:50:06,030 Why they're choosing to not sign up on the campus. 424 00:50:07,910 --> 00:50:09,250 All right, so ballot tracks. 425 00:50:09,910 --> 00:50:16,470 Ballet tracks continues to be a pretty extraordinarily successful program that we rolled out during the 2020 cycle. 426 00:50:17,670 --> 00:50:28,790 During, again, to go back, remember we have about 4 million active registered voters, about 2.2 million of them received ballot tracks notices. 427 00:50:31,090 --> 00:50:35,850 The contact method, I have a better slide on contact methods, so I'll hold that. 428 00:50:36,250 --> 00:50:41,630 You can see it's slightly weighted toward democratic and, of course, not affiliated voters, 429 00:50:42,550 --> 00:50:46,610 but as a percentage, slightly weighted toward democratic voters. 430 00:50:48,030 --> 00:50:50,310 But for the most part, it's pretty much a wash. 431 00:50:50,310 --> 00:51:03,630 The county that has the most highest percentage of Douglas county, they seem to be county with the highest percentage of emails on their voter file. 432 00:51:04,470 --> 00:51:10,850 And then, said to the county, year after year, year is our lowest percentage ballot track use. 433 00:51:11,690 --> 00:51:17,490 Honestly, don't, no idea what's happening in Central County. I should have endeavored to find that out. 434 00:51:18,410 --> 00:51:30,610 Here's more information so of the 2 million people that are receiving their notices about 87% of them are getting their notices through their email. 435 00:51:31,650 --> 00:51:38,690 But 250,000 or so are getting their notices by a text message and another 25,000 are getting voices. 436 00:51:39,290 --> 00:51:46,650 So can I just tell you what that means? What that means is that 250,000 people went on to the website 437 00:51:46,650 --> 00:51:53,490 and said, I don't want to get an email, I want to get a text. So just that sort of gives 438 00:51:53,490 --> 00:51:58,890 credence to the idea that they're pretty engaged populists because they're not just passively 439 00:51:58,890 --> 00:52:03,430 receiving this information. They're actually going and saying, no, I want it this way or I want 440 00:52:03,430 --> 00:52:12,670 it these various ways. And the total number does not match up because the many people are receiving 441 00:52:12,670 --> 00:52:19,830 their notices and multiple ways, like, for instance, me. I receive all three of us. And yes, 442 00:52:19,890 --> 00:52:26,030 it's very annoying. But that's okay. I just want to make sure it all works. And, you know, 443 00:52:26,030 --> 00:52:32,610 it's part of the gate. So, so I'll get all of these notifications. I know many other people are 444 00:52:32,610 --> 00:52:38,350 like that too, especially the staff and the elections division. They often we are the ones 445 00:52:38,350 --> 00:52:39,970 that are receiving the multiple notifications. 446 00:52:41,610 --> 00:52:41,990 All right. 447 00:52:42,670 --> 00:52:44,310 While I have your wrapped attention, 448 00:52:44,790 --> 00:52:47,770 I will do a little plug for Colorado 449 00:52:47,770 --> 00:52:49,390 and the big team of things. 450 00:52:50,450 --> 00:52:52,670 This is Colorado's motor registration rate, 451 00:52:52,890 --> 00:52:59,010 compared to the country based on the 2024 general election data. 452 00:52:59,710 --> 00:53:02,530 I've done a UR here pointer. 453 00:53:02,530 --> 00:53:11,490 We are in third on the list of highest percentage registered of any U.S. states. 454 00:53:12,370 --> 00:53:16,690 The two above us are the district of Columbia. 455 00:53:17,210 --> 00:53:19,090 They don't even count. They're not a state. 456 00:53:20,090 --> 00:53:24,010 So it's actually where actually in second place among the states. 457 00:53:24,350 --> 00:53:26,850 The state immediately ahead of us is Maryland. 458 00:53:27,750 --> 00:53:31,770 and Maryland is always a very high percentage in this, 459 00:53:31,850 --> 00:53:34,010 so we're just a little bit behind them, 460 00:53:34,170 --> 00:53:36,110 but we will endeavor to catch them. 461 00:53:37,730 --> 00:53:39,670 This is, I know this is a very busy slide, 462 00:53:39,930 --> 00:53:42,050 but the most of it's up in this blue. 463 00:53:43,050 --> 00:53:45,770 This is our voter registration over the years, 464 00:53:45,890 --> 00:53:47,090 going back to 2016, 465 00:53:47,570 --> 00:53:50,370 and then our turnout percentage among active voters 466 00:53:50,370 --> 00:53:52,630 during those same years. 467 00:53:53,750 --> 00:53:55,650 Or I'm sorry among eligible voters, 468 00:53:55,650 --> 00:54:00,470 during that same period of time. So you can see we've been steadily in the 92 469 00:54:00,470 --> 00:54:09,010 estranged of registered voters among eligible and then we are in presidential years voting 470 00:54:09,010 --> 00:54:17,790 that around 72, 74, 76% and then the congressional years were in the say 60% range. 471 00:54:18,450 --> 00:54:24,250 So based solely on these statistics I would expect this fall that we would have about 60% turn out 472 00:54:24,250 --> 00:54:27,930 for this general election in 82 days. 473 00:54:29,450 --> 00:54:30,810 Let's see, I think I have two more. 474 00:54:31,650 --> 00:54:35,650 This is Colorado compared to the average national turnout. 475 00:54:36,530 --> 00:54:40,310 Again, of eligible voters, if you go back to 2000, 476 00:54:40,570 --> 00:54:43,410 we were basically a run of the middle of the pack state. 477 00:54:44,070 --> 00:54:47,670 But over time, we have separated from the rest of the country 478 00:54:47,670 --> 00:54:49,590 or at least on average the rest of the country. 479 00:54:50,070 --> 00:54:53,510 And we are not consistently about 10% higher turnout 480 00:54:53,510 --> 00:54:59,210 in the rest of the country, in both sets of elections, both presidential and congressional elections. 481 00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:29,980 One to one comparison. But for the ones that we do all hold, Colorado's really quite good. Why is that? Well, my argument would be, it's because of our excellent policies and the fantastic people that implement those policies. So we have been really focused in this office and throughout the state, the CCCA as well, to pass the best possible laws we can to both be safe and secure. 482 00:55:30,000 --> 00:55:34,460 but also providing people of the great opportunity to register and to get their ballots. 483 00:55:35,620 --> 00:55:41,360 And then we're trying to do our very best to count those ballots which are fairly 484 00:55:42,820 --> 00:55:52,000 and accurately cast. And then the last thing I'll put you in relation to the rest of the country. 485 00:55:53,100 --> 00:55:59,400 So these are the states that typically are top five, top six, top 10 states in terms of turnout. 486 00:56:00,140 --> 00:56:08,340 In 2000 Colorado again, not a great state, but since then we've done a lot to try to make 487 00:56:08,340 --> 00:56:15,340 ourselves more attractive state for people to register into vote and over time we've gotten 488 00:56:15,340 --> 00:56:21,220 to be one of the really high performing states and for a couple of cycles we were right behind 489 00:56:21,220 --> 00:56:21,740 Minnesota. 490 00:56:23,140 --> 00:56:29,880 But we're now back down to about third or fourth and I'll just note that there are various 491 00:56:29,880 --> 00:56:35,040 you can calculate this. I've seen other ones which say that we're six. I don't like those. I 492 00:56:35,040 --> 00:56:40,860 like the ones where we are fourth. Occasionally, though, we are better in those other ones. That's 493 00:56:40,860 --> 00:56:47,920 when I like those. But for the most part, we are, by one measure, this is one particular measure, 494 00:56:48,300 --> 00:56:56,500 we're at top five state in turnout over the last decade. All right, I think that's me. Yes, 495 00:56:57,140 --> 00:57:09,220 So I will stop sharing if anybody has any questions or thoughts about some of those. I'm happy to discuss them and we know I could pull them back up if you want to dive in 496 00:57:17,480 --> 00:57:20,240 or perhaps it was such a brilliant presentation. 497 00:57:21,440 --> 00:57:23,480 all questions were answered. 498 00:57:30,910 --> 00:57:36,590 Glad to know you're all fine with it. Alright, so that was 499 00:57:36,590 --> 00:57:44,490 me. We also have on the agenda Neil McBernett who's going to tell us about some of the 500 00:57:44,490 --> 00:57:51,710 work that he's been doing. I know Matt Creme also had, he was, Matt was going to do the intro 501 00:57:51,710 --> 00:57:54,810 to Neil. So let me hand it to Matt so you can 502 00:57:54,810 --> 00:57:57,150 enjoy me. Sure. Thanks, Judd. And get out of 503 00:57:57,150 --> 00:58:00,370 noon, everybody. It's good to see you all. You know, 504 00:58:00,410 --> 00:58:02,550 we just wanted to provide a brief update on something 505 00:58:02,550 --> 00:58:07,490 that we have been working on. It's been 10 years 506 00:58:07,490 --> 00:58:09,870 since Colorado was the first state to do a statewide 507 00:58:09,870 --> 00:58:12,490 risk limiting audit. And we thought that this was a 508 00:58:12,490 --> 00:58:15,710 good time to take a look at that process. I think most 509 00:58:15,710 --> 00:58:18,110 experts would agree. I mean, including Philip 510 00:58:18,550 --> 00:58:19,890 Starcoath, you know, who's the creative 511 00:58:19,890 --> 00:58:25,130 of all the states that are doing this, Colorado does it the best, however, that doesn't mean that 512 00:58:25,130 --> 00:58:30,890 there isn't room for improvement and that we can't push to get better and provide better data 513 00:58:30,890 --> 00:58:35,650 and hopefully better confidence to voters that our elections are above board and honest. 514 00:58:36,090 --> 00:58:42,590 So we've convened a small working group that includes Judd and others from the Secretary of State's office. 515 00:58:43,250 --> 00:58:47,930 There are few counties representative of different county sizes and regions involved. 516 00:58:47,930 --> 00:58:52,270 And we have elections, stakeholders, like Neil Nick Burnett, and Philip Upsdark, who are also 517 00:58:52,270 --> 00:58:56,630 part of these conversations, where we're really diving down into what our risk limiting 518 00:58:56,630 --> 00:59:01,950 audit process looks like what was the original design of the risk limiting audit, and then 519 00:59:01,950 --> 00:59:07,470 how we can update it and prove our process here, and there's some low-hanging fruit that 520 00:59:07,470 --> 00:59:11,470 we're trying to tackle, and then there's some deeper conversations. 521 00:59:11,990 --> 00:59:17,330 There are things that are pretty easy to identify, like who picks the races, it's not 522 00:59:17,330 --> 00:59:22,550 best practice to have the racist chosen by somebody is there a random way that we can get to 523 00:59:22,550 --> 00:59:28,790 selecting a racist. What can we do to publish and get a better sense of confidence about the 524 00:59:28,790 --> 00:59:33,990 non-targeted races in an RLA? And is there a way where with all of the ballots that we can pull to, 525 00:59:34,130 --> 00:59:41,510 we can get to relatively the same risk limit for all of those contests there? So those are just a 526 00:59:41,510 --> 00:59:46,290 couple of different things, you know, how can we validate this as their way that we can provide 527 00:59:46,290 --> 00:59:54,290 Outside validation right now, we have our corollatool where our audit boards enter in the selections from the 528 00:59:54,290 --> 00:59:57,610 from the voters and that's compared to the CAS vote record. 529 00:59:57,790 --> 00:59:59,970 But if there's something else that we can do to 530 01:00:26,240 --> 01:00:29,900 We're also excited about the work that Neil and his 531 01:00:29,900 --> 01:00:36,600 doing. So Neil, a lot of time it over to user. Well, thank you. And really starting off with 532 01:00:36,600 --> 01:00:44,600 a big thanks to Matt for leading so many important innovations in Colorado. Matt's team did the 533 01:00:44,600 --> 01:00:54,120 first when he was county clerk did the first ballot level risk limiting on it at scale that we've seen 534 01:00:54,120 --> 01:00:58,020 anywhere and continues to push the envelope there. 535 01:00:59,700 --> 01:01:04,860 So I really appreciate the ability to work in Colorado. 536 01:01:05,360 --> 01:01:11,180 I think Colorado supports what we call evidence-based elections better than any other 537 01:01:11,180 --> 01:01:14,420 state that I'm aware of and I try to follow lots of the states. 538 01:01:15,720 --> 01:01:19,800 And that's because of folks like Matt and the Clarks Association, 539 01:01:19,800 --> 01:01:27,700 and clerks like Tiffany Lee in La Plata County, Carly Coppice, and Welc County, Kevin 540 01:01:27,700 --> 01:01:35,840 Stratch and Morgan County, really this year moving the ball forward with some pilot improvements 541 01:01:35,840 --> 01:01:42,720 to the audit, and also to Lori Stevens and Mike Grayson, John Karen for being great colleagues 542 01:01:42,720 --> 01:01:48,920 with me in trying to push this process forward. And the Secretary of State's office has been doing 543 01:01:48,920 --> 01:01:57,920 amazing support over the years, you know, stepped up to what turned out to be a bigger task than I'm sure people thought in the beginning. 544 01:01:58,740 --> 01:02:16,900 And so we've got a great foundation to start on and this new Colorado RLA modernization group is trying to fill in some perceived gaps or opportunities to make it more obviously publicly verifiable and so on. 545 01:02:16,900 --> 01:02:27,520 And I just want to start off framing this in terms of what the problem is, there are, you 546 01:02:27,520 --> 01:02:31,020 all know that you vote on dozens of contests in many elections. 547 01:02:32,080 --> 01:02:36,260 And we think all of those contests to sort of auditing. 548 01:02:36,300 --> 01:02:42,460 Most places around the country are only auditing a couple of contests in each election. 549 01:02:42,460 --> 01:02:50,800 and a local bond issue can make a great deal of difference to people's tax rates, to people's 550 01:02:50,800 --> 01:03:00,500 representation locally. So in Colorado we got gather data on all the contests and while we officially 551 01:03:01,340 --> 01:03:09,540 target a small number typically the data that we gather really allows us to say a lot more about what's 552 01:03:10,820 --> 01:03:19,120 And that's even more true these days with prediction markets and people are actually placing bets on obscure aspects of elections. 553 01:03:19,620 --> 01:03:38,900 So what we're just trying to drive the data and the analysis to all the contests, which also helps deal with the fact that even if only a couple contests are selected, we're actually auditing and getting audited for all of them. 554 01:03:39,540 --> 01:03:48,400 In the last primary, the clerks that I mentioned were super in collaborating with our work 555 01:03:50,480 --> 01:03:57,780 to allow the data, not only the data on the manifests, which has been published in the audit 556 01:03:57,780 --> 01:04:06,040 center for many years to be verified and for the random selection to be verified, but to actually 557 01:04:06,040 --> 01:04:15,620 be able to personally verify that the audit interpretation of the ballots that are selected 558 01:04:15,620 --> 01:04:21,660 matches how the voting system recorded it. So let me step back a little bit to how 559 01:04:21,660 --> 01:04:27,520 it's actually worked for those that don't follow the details. In Colorado unlike most states, 560 01:04:27,520 --> 01:04:32,580 we actually publish, we actually obtained data 561 01:04:33,240 --> 01:04:36,000 on every individual ballot and how it was marked. 562 01:05:00,000 --> 01:05:08,260 Compares, that's the cast voter record, is the systems interpretation of every mark for every contest that the voter voted in. 563 01:05:08,380 --> 01:05:17,220 And we compare that with a person taking up a ballot by hand and looking at it and interpreting the marks. So that's the voter verified paper ballot. 564 01:05:18,520 --> 01:05:29,720 And one of the concerns that some people have raised is that we've often been using a different computer program, the auditing software that we wrote. 565 01:05:30,000 --> 01:05:40,200 to do the comparison and make sure that the ballots were recorded the way that they're actually interpreted 566 01:05:40,960 --> 01:05:47,180 and to deal with the very rare discrepancy that happened. So I think we had a total of just 16 567 01:05:48,060 --> 01:05:53,060 cases where they picked the wrong ballot by mistake and didn't notice and so on and there was a 568 01:05:53,060 --> 01:06:00,120 very small discrepancy across thousands of actual vote comparisons. 569 01:06:05,500 --> 01:06:11,920 So we gather all that data and we establish the outcome of the audit. 570 01:06:12,280 --> 01:06:17,160 And this year we had volunteers from places like the League of Women Voters, 571 01:06:17,160 --> 01:06:23,780 sitting during the audit and listening and comparing it with their own copy of that 572 01:06:23,780 --> 01:06:31,660 cast-foot record, properly anonymized cast-foot record, that would let them confirm for themselves, 573 01:06:31,780 --> 01:06:39,180 not trust another piece of software how that work. Even more exciting, some people are a little 574 01:06:39,180 --> 01:06:44,040 mystified by how the random selection works. They know that we roll some dice and pick some ballots 575 01:06:44,040 --> 01:06:49,000 based on that, but it's a little mysterious how that happened. So this time in those counties, 576 01:06:49,240 --> 01:06:56,500 we actually took Canvas board members and audit board members and observers and said, 577 01:06:56,800 --> 01:07:03,380 you know, go and pick a ballot point at a ballot. We don't have observers touching ballots, 578 01:07:03,800 --> 01:07:10,040 but you know, identify a ballot in a box, a paper ballot in a box, pull it out and let's see if 579 01:07:12,260 --> 01:07:15,520 that marks on the ballot match what we have in our 580 01:07:15,520 --> 01:07:19,400 cash vote record and those all matched perfectly. 581 01:07:21,000 --> 01:07:26,120 And similarly to look at some ballots that people thought might have been a little, 582 01:07:26,120 --> 01:07:35,160 they might be surprised at the combination of votes that people, you know, choices that people made 583 01:07:35,160 --> 01:07:39,900 in the election then again, we could select from the cash vote record and go and find 584 01:07:39,900 --> 01:07:45,000 the paper valet and again, you know, it feels in the moment almost like taking a rabbit out of the hat. 585 01:07:45,180 --> 01:07:51,280 It's like, yep, that's exactly, we found a piece of paper that matches exactly what the Caspo record said. 586 01:07:52,560 --> 01:08:04,120 So, that's perhaps more detailed than you want to go into, but we're just very excited to have a more human process and a more engaged process with observers to see that. 587 01:08:04,120 --> 01:08:12,980 and we look forward to learning some of the lessons that we had and allow that process to improve 588 01:08:12,980 --> 01:08:15,120 and modernize how we're doing things. 589 01:08:17,380 --> 01:08:23,180 I'll briefly note, I'm going to have some comments, some slides to share at some point 590 01:08:23,180 --> 01:08:29,400 and I'll have them ready right now, but the election assistance commission at the national level has an 591 01:08:29,400 --> 01:08:35,160 an audit standards process, and there were a lot of comments by people across the country. 592 01:08:36,920 --> 01:08:42,960 And I find them very interesting. I find them relevant to Colorado. There's a lot of interest 593 01:08:42,960 --> 01:08:48,360 in exactly the sort of thing that we're doing, which is moving towards more independence, 594 01:08:48,620 --> 01:08:55,200 and how the audit happens, and more ability for the results to be clear. 595 01:08:55,200 --> 01:09:01,920 And then kind of in another vein, I'm very excited to see that the Longmont Council, I'm 596 01:09:01,920 --> 01:09:07,460 going to leave a women voter's representative to this commission and delighted that the 597 01:09:07,460 --> 01:09:12,980 Longmont City Council is moving forward on a form of ranked choice voting. 598 01:09:13,660 --> 01:09:20,340 They've put a measure on the ballot to adopt, not just the kind that most people are familiar 599 01:09:20,340 --> 01:09:27,360 with that we've used in Boulder, but a proportional representation form of right choice voting 600 01:09:27,360 --> 01:09:35,420 called single transferable vote. And if the voters approve it, that will go to be used in 601 01:09:35,420 --> 01:09:41,480 2029 elections. And so one thing that I just want to highlight, even though it's several years 602 01:10:00,000 --> 01:10:07,340 A particular voting method to be supported. It is already, it works in the software that we use in all the relevant 603 01:10:07,340 --> 01:10:15,000 counties, but we have to make sure that everything is properly certified and tested and that 604 01:10:15,000 --> 01:10:20,340 the election officials are prepared to support the voters in moving to this highly improved 605 01:10:20,340 --> 01:10:28,760 voting method. So I just want to make people aware of that and please let us know if there's anything 606 01:10:28,760 --> 01:10:33,680 that needs to happen on a certain timeline to make that happen, 607 01:10:36,100 --> 01:10:38,300 and we also have some top 608 01:10:38,300 --> 01:10:44,100 scholars in the world, including folks that I hope will be able to comment later in this 609 01:10:44,100 --> 01:10:54,480 meeting on how to audit this enhanced voting method in a way that continues to give us confidence 610 01:10:54,480 --> 01:10:55,440 and the results. 611 01:10:58,420 --> 01:11:04,560 I'll also briefly note that the League of Women Voters has been alarmed 612 01:11:04,560 --> 01:11:15,260 at the bill that was passed, HB25, 13, 15, that turned the general election into a closed primary 613 01:11:15,260 --> 01:11:23,440 election. The actual final decision in some elections, vacancy elections is being made during 614 01:11:23,440 --> 01:11:31,540 general election which is only in which only people of certain parties can vote and that is 615 01:11:31,540 --> 01:11:38,900 in violation of the US Constitution and the Colorado Constitution and so we follow lawsuit a 616 01:11:38,900 --> 01:11:48,040 couple months ago and I just want to again bring that to people's attention and ask for support 617 01:11:48,040 --> 01:11:52,180 to make sure that everybody can vote 618 01:11:52,180 --> 01:11:53,960 in the elections that matter to them. 619 01:11:56,380 --> 01:12:02,560 I'm also going to bring up a concern that I heard 620 01:12:02,560 --> 01:12:04,080 and I don't fully understand. 621 01:12:04,340 --> 01:12:05,820 So if we give me if I get something wrong, 622 01:12:07,020 --> 01:12:09,620 but special district voter list maintenance. 623 01:12:11,540 --> 01:12:15,000 When we think about the impact of small local elections 624 01:12:15,000 --> 01:12:16,820 on people, a special district, 625 01:12:16,820 --> 01:12:23,960 that's something like a metro district or a water district, a sewer district can have huge tax 626 01:12:23,960 --> 01:12:29,220 implications for voters in the district. Then of course huge benefits, you know, constructing 627 01:12:29,220 --> 01:12:35,540 roads and building sewer systems and fixing things. But there's been controversy at various 628 01:12:35,540 --> 01:12:42,720 times about how they structured our bonds and interest rates and concern for the need for the 629 01:12:42,720 --> 01:12:47,240 people who are being taxed to have input on how all that is happening. 630 01:12:48,200 --> 01:12:57,400 And this is particularly challenging because tax districts are the information you need to 631 01:12:57,400 --> 01:13:05,460 determine who can vote is part of the assessor's records because a property owner is eligible 632 01:13:05,460 --> 01:13:12,120 to vote about their tax rates, even if they are a local resident, so they might not be in the voter 633 01:13:12,120 --> 01:13:17,080 or they might live in another state, but they can still vote. 634 01:13:17,500 --> 01:13:20,360 And matching these records up turns out to be really hard. 635 01:13:20,460 --> 01:13:24,420 So I just want to put in a plug for people to pay attention 636 01:13:24,420 --> 01:13:28,820 to how this happens and some of the designated election officials 637 01:13:28,820 --> 01:13:34,880 for the special districts have some... 638 01:13:34,880 --> 01:13:37,340 I don't necessarily have the experience needed. 639 01:13:37,340 --> 01:13:45,340 it can be very complicated to get to match the people with how to contact them and how to 640 01:13:45,340 --> 01:13:51,900 send them their ballots. So I just wanted to flag that for people that want to dive into that. 641 01:13:53,340 --> 01:13:57,400 I think that's what I had on my list. Appreciate your time. 642 01:13:58,240 --> 01:14:02,040 All right, Neil. Thank you. Anybody have any questions for me? 643 01:14:05,340 --> 01:14:16,480 Just as a note on that last point, you know, we are totally at the whim of the jurisdictions that provide information to the counties. 644 01:14:16,940 --> 01:14:23,480 And so the way the law is written, the counties are just have to accept the list that they're given. 645 01:14:24,700 --> 01:14:28,700 I'm sure Mount will have some ideas about how to fix that. 646 01:14:29,320 --> 01:14:32,780 Yeah, I mean, some of this might require legislative fixes. 647 01:14:33,000 --> 01:14:37,140 I know the legislature was trying to make sure that everybody, for sure, 648 01:14:38,520 --> 01:14:41,180 that it was designated to get a ballot and would get one, 649 01:14:42,380 --> 01:14:44,860 but they're making mistakes in both directions, apparently. 650 01:14:46,600 --> 01:14:54,120 So, some way to make sure that these databases can actually be matched up properly. 651 01:14:55,200 --> 01:14:57,120 Makes sense. Again, I'm not sure. 652 01:14:57,640 --> 01:14:59,860 Things are always more complicated than I'd like. 653 01:15:05,260 --> 01:15:23,600 All right. Thank you. So this is now the part of the agenda where all of you on the screen can comment or throw out some ideas, things that you would like us to focus on in the future. 654 01:15:24,640 --> 01:15:31,780 you could talk about legislative initiatives you could talk about anything you want to. So any of the 655 01:15:31,780 --> 01:15:39,740 commissioners if you want to pipe up now you can and then we'll do an open mic with those 656 01:15:39,740 --> 01:15:40,880 who are in the audience. 657 01:15:48,590 --> 01:15:49,530 Seeing anything. 658 01:15:53,350 --> 01:15:57,330 Well, what I'm going to leave that there then and I am going to 659 01:15:57,330 --> 01:15:59,470 on my colleague, Cheryl, 660 01:16:01,690 --> 01:16:08,990 could you monitor the audience to see if anybody would like to make any comments? 661 01:16:10,270 --> 01:16:18,610 I would be happy to, if there is anybody in the attendance that has called in or is in the public. 662 01:16:18,970 --> 01:16:23,930 If you would like to provide comment, please raise your hand and we will call on you as your hands come up. 663 01:16:24,390 --> 01:16:25,230 All 664 01:16:31,150 --> 01:16:37,450 right, okay. Yep. All right. So we'll call on Jason Bertolachie first. I'm going to go ahead and unmute you. 665 01:16:40,950 --> 01:16:47,370 Hey Jason. Hey Jeff. Hey Jeff. No comment, but I just had a quick question on the plain language. 666 01:16:47,530 --> 01:17:00,990 Bill, the HP 261320. I'm curious. Do you think there's going to be any rule making required on that or is it legislation clear enough that you're going to just let that win implement as is 667 01:17:04,930 --> 01:17:10,390 I will defer to Alex or John who member once to chime in here. 668 01:17:10,630 --> 01:17:13,630 I would note though that we literally are promulgating rules today. 669 01:17:13,810 --> 01:17:16,870 I mean, they're notists on the website, so. 670 01:17:17,450 --> 01:17:18,470 I can chime in on that one. 671 01:17:18,710 --> 01:17:21,110 I think, and Alex, feel free to chime in, too. 672 01:17:21,430 --> 01:17:25,930 I don't believe title board has its own set of rulemaking authority, typically what title board 673 01:17:25,930 --> 01:17:30,050 does is work through their own guidance and work with their own legal counsel, so I think 674 01:17:30,050 --> 01:17:34,410 understanding what that bill is that they're going to look at the legislation and then work 675 01:17:34,410 --> 01:17:39,150 with their council through the Attorney General's Office and work because it's a three agency 676 01:17:39,150 --> 01:17:44,090 operation right between the legislature or office in the Attorney General's Office. So I don't think 677 01:17:44,090 --> 01:17:50,110 there's formal rule making authority nor is my recollection that bill directs them to 678 01:17:50,110 --> 01:17:54,810 promulgate rules, but the statute will provide the guidance that then they will take and then 679 01:17:54,810 --> 01:17:59,390 work amongst themselves and with their council and work to figure out how that forms into the 680 01:17:59,390 --> 01:18:01,330 titles that they set at Title Board. 681 01:18:01,750 --> 01:18:04,350 So I think that's my understanding, Alex Judd, 682 01:18:04,350 --> 01:18:06,590 Chen, and if you have a different understanding, 683 01:18:06,670 --> 01:18:09,810 but I'm pretty sure that's the general approach 684 01:18:09,810 --> 01:18:11,890 that that is likely to happen. 685 01:18:13,310 --> 01:18:16,570 Yeah, I'm hearing from Theresa Conlayers, 686 01:18:17,330 --> 01:18:19,530 our representative to the time board, 687 01:18:20,070 --> 01:18:22,870 who is telling me, yes, those will be the kinds of things 688 01:18:22,870 --> 01:18:25,370 we will address during the next set of hearings 689 01:18:26,030 --> 01:18:28,270 when they do hearings next. 690 01:18:29,970 --> 01:18:33,610 So, so thank you, Jason, appreciate it. 691 01:18:33,930 --> 01:18:35,510 And it looks like Bobby Gross. 692 01:18:36,030 --> 01:18:39,750 I know that name, Bobby Gross is next up. 693 01:18:42,030 --> 01:18:42,230 Oh. 694 01:18:47,560 --> 01:18:48,280 He or he did it. 695 01:18:48,980 --> 01:18:49,000 Yeah. 696 01:18:49,120 --> 01:18:49,360 Sorry. 697 01:18:49,640 --> 01:18:50,340 I got unmuted. 698 01:18:51,140 --> 01:18:54,480 Hey, just a quick comment or request. 699 01:18:54,720 --> 01:18:58,220 Can we get some of those stats that you provided that would be great? 700 01:18:58,480 --> 01:18:58,880 Oh, yeah. 701 01:18:59,740 --> 01:19:04,500 I'm so glad you mentioned that because what we always do is anybody that makes a formal presentation 702 01:19:04,500 --> 01:19:16,200 like mine and Alex's today. We post that on the BAAC BAC web page on the under the 703 01:19:16,200 --> 01:19:20,780 Elections Division at Secretary's State's office. So if you scroll down and 704 01:19:20,780 --> 01:19:25,520 believe it's under meetings or conferences, something like that under the 705 01:19:25,520 --> 01:19:29,280 elections, you'll see that BAC is listed there and you can go find anything 706 01:19:29,280 --> 01:19:37,260 from past times in which we've done these presentations. However, because you, Bobby Gross, 707 01:19:38,560 --> 01:19:46,680 my favorite Mason County clerk, have reached out today in the presentation. I will make sure 708 01:19:46,680 --> 01:19:51,500 that you get yours today. So this is over. I'll send it your way. Thank you. I appreciate that. 709 01:19:51,540 --> 01:19:57,640 No problem. I would like to mention that anything for the by-person election advisory commission 710 01:19:57,640 --> 01:19:59,780 is under laws and resources. 711 01:20:00,000 --> 01:20:29,840 Thank you if you unmute yourself. Okay, thank you. And it's barb winery. Oh, sorry. Oh, no worries. A lot of people mispronounce my name. Anyway, I'm up here in a really well county. And I'm also in charge of poll watchers for my party, but it's coming to my attention that there's a lot of nonpartisan coalition groups that are having poll watcher or poll monitors. 712 01:20:30,000 --> 01:20:37,520 or poll observers. And I'm just kind of concerned about how we're going to manage all the people 713 01:20:37,520 --> 01:20:44,040 who might be out attempting to do those kinds of things, this election, in addition to the 714 01:20:44,040 --> 01:20:45,660 approved poll watchers. 715 01:20:48,920 --> 01:21:02,280 Well, so under Colorado Law to be an official observer at either a 716 01:21:02,280 --> 01:21:11,360 designated by either our election office or potentially by the county and you would need to fit 717 01:21:11,360 --> 01:21:18,160 the criteria under the law to either be a watcher or to be an observer. So there are different 718 01:21:18,160 --> 01:21:26,780 two different ways you can go. And the people that and both of them require that you meet certain 719 01:21:26,780 --> 01:21:38,980 criteria and get pre-approval. In order to watch the check-in process and observe the check-in 720 01:21:38,980 --> 01:21:44,400 process, you and frankly a bunch of the other things where you might have access to personally 721 01:21:44,400 --> 01:21:53,240 identifying information. You have to take a class and be certified as a watcher or an observer 722 01:21:53,240 --> 01:21:59,800 to have access to that information. So we don't anticipate that there will be a lot of freelance 723 01:21:59,800 --> 01:22:07,260 people trying to observe because frankly it's not permitted under the law. And thus far I have not 724 01:22:07,260 --> 01:22:14,260 heard from a lot of either national or national groups interested in participating in observation 725 01:22:14,260 --> 01:22:21,160 for this election cycle. I think you're probably right that there will be party members representing 726 01:22:21,160 --> 01:22:30,060 the Democratic and Republican Party. But again, probably not as many as we saw in 2024 because 727 01:22:30,060 --> 01:22:36,020 people are just less inclined to be this level of engaged for a congressional election than 728 01:22:36,020 --> 01:22:44,700 they are for a presidential. But we will always, you know, try to manage through in those expectations. 729 01:22:44,820 --> 01:22:50,520 And if we see a surge of people, we will work with the counties to make sure that they're meeting 730 01:22:50,520 --> 01:22:54,600 their statutory obligations, as well as simultaneously conducting the election. 731 01:22:59,910 --> 01:23:00,990 Anything else? 732 01:23:03,880 --> 01:23:04,300 All right. 733 01:23:04,380 --> 01:23:05,000 Thank you, Barbara. 734 01:23:10,340 --> 01:23:10,680 All right. 735 01:23:10,860 --> 01:23:11,620 I do not see any issues. 736 01:23:11,940 --> 01:23:18,520 I'll just chime in that having making it easier for people to observe makes sense to me. 737 01:23:20,660 --> 01:23:25,060 It's much more difficult for people not affiliated with parties to observe. 738 01:23:25,380 --> 01:23:30,520 And, you know, of course we need to have proper security and decorum and so on. 739 01:23:30,520 --> 01:23:34,500 But living is important for elections. 740 01:23:35,660 --> 01:23:37,540 Yeah, and it's sort of county specific. 741 01:23:37,720 --> 01:23:41,540 There are counties where there are lots of observers or lots 742 01:23:41,540 --> 01:23:42,760 of watchers. 743 01:23:43,280 --> 01:23:45,620 Obviously, Boulder County comes to mind. 744 01:23:46,060 --> 01:23:50,400 They often will have so many watchers at the central 745 01:23:50,400 --> 01:23:54,300 campus facility that they'll have to come in in waves. 746 01:23:54,980 --> 01:23:59,700 Because there will be too many people in the room to be able to 747 01:23:59,700 --> 01:24:09,800 the group and actually do the work. So that's an example of a county that really has to be on their toes, 748 01:24:10,100 --> 01:24:18,540 have to have people that will manage all of the watchers and observers that are happening at that location. 749 01:25:00,180 --> 01:25:15,220 And I'm not familiar in any of the years that I've been here where we've gotten to a position where watchers have been overwhelming or disruptive or anything like that. 750 01:25:16,140 --> 01:25:23,420 Most people that want to be a watcher or an observer are really there to see what's happening and see their democracy at work. 751 01:25:23,420 --> 01:25:28,500 and aren't think our laws and policies do the very best 752 01:25:28,500 --> 01:25:31,000 to try to fluctuate that. 753 01:25:33,890 --> 01:25:35,670 It looks like we want to just get with that out 754 01:25:35,670 --> 01:25:38,190 to barb-winnery for being one of our servers 755 01:25:38,190 --> 01:25:43,690 during that, the RLA, so great job done there apply. 756 01:25:44,870 --> 01:25:46,230 Interested citizens. 757 01:25:47,270 --> 01:25:52,330 But this looks like migration has, 758 01:25:53,870 --> 01:25:54,390 Yes. 759 01:25:55,590 --> 01:25:56,230 Hi, Mike. 760 01:25:57,230 --> 01:25:57,490 Hey, Jeff. 761 01:25:58,150 --> 01:25:59,230 So I just have a question. 762 01:25:59,690 --> 01:26:08,510 You've mentioned how much growth there's been in the unaffiliated voters to the point where there are majority in and 763 01:26:08,510 --> 01:26:18,150 themselves, is there any conversation in your office about involving them more in the audit 764 01:26:18,150 --> 01:26:23,370 process, the observation, even Canvas board activities? 765 01:26:25,850 --> 01:26:31,090 Well, that sounds like a policy question. I'm more of a process guy, so I'm going to hand it 766 01:26:31,090 --> 01:26:36,410 to the policy people, John Alex Andrew, one of you, have any thoughts on that? 767 01:26:44,020 --> 01:26:46,540 I know this conversation, go, it's all right, go again. 768 01:26:47,480 --> 01:26:50,820 I mean, this conversation comes up in the election cleanup. 769 01:26:51,120 --> 01:26:54,780 I know I can't remember the specifics of the last conversation this year, 770 01:26:54,920 --> 01:26:57,340 as it related to the cleanup, but I know this is a 771 01:26:57,340 --> 01:27:00,080 pranegal point of conversation that I expected to come up. 772 01:27:00,240 --> 01:27:03,780 Next year as we look to another cleanup, especially since we ticked over that 50% 773 01:27:05,020 --> 01:27:09,280 but as of right now I don't have anything to speak to specifically in terms of policy changes in front 774 01:27:09,280 --> 01:27:12,140 of us, but that doesn't mean that isn't going to change at some point. 775 01:27:13,680 --> 01:27:19,520 Who would be the person that we would talk to in your office about such issues? 776 01:27:23,060 --> 01:27:27,860 Well, my two senses that that would be an Alex conversation. 777 01:27:29,600 --> 01:27:34,220 I would give Alex a call or drop him an email and he'll follow up. 778 01:27:34,400 --> 01:27:41,160 Okay, I'll just note that there are other, we are the Secretary of State's office, 779 01:27:41,160 --> 01:27:44,340 but the counties also have a big role in all of this. 780 01:27:44,780 --> 01:27:50,700 So, Matt or Carly or Jenny and others on the screen 781 01:27:50,700 --> 01:27:53,840 may very well have some thoughts on this one as well. 782 01:27:55,260 --> 01:27:55,740 Thank you. 783 01:28:02,420 --> 01:28:04,480 All right, any other questions? 784 01:28:06,840 --> 01:28:09,720 Comments, thoughts, predictions? 785 01:28:16,310 --> 01:28:17,030 All right, see, nothing. 786 01:28:18,530 --> 01:28:19,710 Well, hey, this has been a great meeting. 787 01:28:19,850 --> 01:28:21,070 We really appreciate it. 788 01:28:21,070 --> 01:28:25,590 And we'll be in touch soon for scheduling the next meeting. 789 01:28:25,810 --> 01:28:31,610 We do three of these a year, so I would expect one in the coming couple of months. 790 01:28:31,950 --> 01:28:33,830 Look for information related to that.