[7:54] All right, please.
[7:57] I pledge algiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the
[8:03] republic for which it stands. One nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and
[8:11] justice for all.
[8:17] » Council President
>> here.
[8:20] » Council Vice President Michael
>> here.
[8:22] » Council member Joerger
>> here.
[8:25] » Council member Ed
>> here.
[8:27] » Council member Andy here.
>> Okay. Next up on the agenda is the uh
[8:33] consent agenda.
register
[8:37] sanuss
[9:00] » no we um we do the payroll in house now
which you're not
[9:04] those because those are all usually
processed through paycheck
[9:09] but we've taken that um inhouse with the
so we made those payments ourselves
[9:18] » yes it is the that is the
security
[9:28] » okay anybody else have any questions on
the
[9:34] So
second I have a motion and second
[9:39] additional discussion. All those in
favor signify by saying I
[9:44] otherwise have citizen comments
[9:50] staff reports. Captain sir good shiny.
Thank you very much for you.
[9:57] » Thank you. Uh we had some recent staff
changes which opened a super supervisory
[10:01] position for night shift. After a small
in-house
[10:06] application process, we have appointed
John Hartley as a sergeant for B nights,
[10:12] not to be confused with Landon Harley,
who is already a sergeant on Bdays. So,
[10:18] we're excited for him and he's getting
started with some of that supervisory
[10:21] training. Now,
some of our officers participated in the
[10:25] street racers detail with IP and state
police back on August 21st.
[10:30] Uh that's through grant money through
the state. Those kind of spinners, those
[10:34] vehicles that take over the
intersections. During that, our one of
[10:37] our officers spotted a reckless vehicle,
stopped him. We were able to get a
[10:42] serious violent felon in possession of a
firearm off the street as well as a
[10:46] driving arrest that was actually very
close to town.
[10:51] We've had a couple of recent breakins
and thefts around Arthur overton that
[10:54] area. We have a couple leads that we're
following up on trying to see if we can
[10:59] gather out of that. We did have a
firearm that stolen out of that. So,
[11:03] obviously that's kind of important for
us to try to get back. We picked up our
[11:07] Polaris Ranger today. Um it was outside
if anybody wants to do that. We have to
[11:12] get decals down still and then we're
going to incorporate that into our
[11:16] driving training that will be coming up.
Speaking of that, we have driving
[11:20] training later this month at the Marian
County Fairgrounds. We've started a
[11:23] partnership with them and using some of
their grounds they have when it's
[11:28] nobody's there. So that's very helpful
that it's a nice large space. There's
[11:30] several different structures that we can
use kind of elevate our training a
[11:34] little bit. We did stops which is
traffic stops training there a couple
[11:38] weeks ago. Um got a lot of positive
feedback from that. use our simulation
[11:42] firearms and Sergeant Landon Hartley
conducted that training for us and again
[11:49] we got a lot of good feedback from our
officers saying they liked it. So
[11:53] trailer retreat coming up on October
17th 3 to 5
[11:58] and chief wanted to mention that we are
coming up on the 25th anniversary of the
[12:02] terrorist attacks on September 11.
>> That's all I
[12:08] appreciate.
[12:12] We uh been digging into insurance both
on the benefits and liability side quite
[12:17] a quite a bit. Um we get benefits
meeting earlier with a somewhat quite
[12:23] trivial things. We're
have a little bit of a tough year but we
[12:28] have some ideas on changes that will
help that out for next year. On the
[12:33] liability side since we changed
brokerage we've probably been meeting
[12:36] with Epic
talking or meeting about times a week.
[12:41] We found a lot there to make changes on
pretty significant got feedback. Not the
[12:46] worst I've seen. So that's that's a good
good bar. But we are going to try to
[12:52] rewrite go to 111 with our liability
insurance the same way we do with our
[12:57] health insurance on the same term. So
everything was up beginning of the year.
[13:02] Um separately uh from that uh the
Indiana School Management Association
[13:10] uh is awarding the town an award at the
leadership lunchon they have for
[13:18] professional management leadership
community partner award. I am the
[13:20] president of that board. I want to be on
record that I did not nominate
[13:25] that
look questionable and the president
[13:29] boards getting award.
So they they select Cumberland for
[13:35] promoting professional management of
government in the state of Indiana.
[13:40] Then also December chamber chooses four
communities from the nine county region
[13:46] to highlight and spotlight every year.
So beginning of December, they are going
[13:52] to do spotlight on County Cumberland for
their fourth quarter event here at town
[13:57] hall, but it's a ticketed event that the
chamber puts on. So they're going to
[14:03] probably bring in some extra chairs and
things for that. We are allowed to
[14:08] reserve x amount of tickets for those
that want to attend from our
[14:12] organization.
That will be right before as well as
[14:17] couple days before that.
[14:21] pretty pretty excited about that. We're
getting somewhat of a regional
[14:25] recognition on the current initiatives
right now. Then Christine and her staff
[14:30] been working with the businesses. They
had the sunflower festival over the
[14:33] weekend. We got really good feedback on
that.
[14:41] All the residents that attended all
[14:48] Thank you, sir.
Public hearing additional
[14:52] appropriations. Is that correct?
[14:57] Open the public hearing.
[15:07] Close the public hearing on
appropriations.
[15:11] Okay. Old business consideration
ordinance 20269.
[15:15] Sir, you're ahead of you right now.
You're fine.
[15:22] » Good afternoon. Um, this is ordinance
126-9. Um, it was introduced at the last
[15:28] council meeting. So, I'll be brief. Uh,
this ordinance is up for vote today. It
[15:33] is an ordinance appropriating additional
funds to the budget of the county
[15:38] with a grand total to7,000.
[15:44] I will be happy to answer any questions.
[16:02] Motion that we approve
amendment 2026.
[16:17] » Have a motion second. Additional
discussion. All those in favor signify
[16:20] by saying I. I. I.
Thank you so much. Thank you.
[16:28] Okay, we have a public hearing for NX
5821 and 5823 West US40. I'll open the
[16:36] public hearing for that.
[16:43] See [snorts] comments I'll close the
public hearing
[16:48] business in the ordinance 2026-10
properties. Miss
[16:55] » Thank you. Um this is the ordinance uh
introduction for the annexation of the
[17:01] property that we just told you about
hearing on. This is just for
[17:04] introduction this evening. Just to
refresh your memory, this property is
[17:10] where
houses and the industrial
[17:14] just buying it. So one of the lots is
already in town while the area next in
[17:19] town and so two lots
[17:25] of impact essentially
>> correct.
[17:41] All right. Any questions, comments? This
only for only this evening.
[17:48] All right. Number two, consideration
resolution 2026-09.
[17:54] » Yes. Um, so this is the resolution that
adopts the fiscal plan for the laws that
[17:59] we just discussed. These are existing
buildings. There's no proposed
[18:03] improvements on it. Um, so it's very
minimal. [snorts]
[18:10] Any questions? All
[18:23] right. Any questions? This is an actual
resolution.
[18:37] Resolution
26-09.
[18:47] I have a motion and second. Any
additional discussion?
[18:52] All those in favor signify by saying I.
I. Oppos. Otherwise have
[18:59] this open. You're on a run tonight.
House Bill 101, the housing audit
[19:04] presentation.
>> Yes. Um so I'll be brief.
[19:09] Um you have a copy of report as well as
the presentation that was provided to
[19:15] commission in the council chair. I also
added a copy of the draft minutes from
[19:19] commission the other night. No one
attended the public hearing. I do know
[19:24] watched since then.
I'm just going to highlight a couple of
[19:29] things that are in the in the
PowerPoint. Um so one is the findings.
[19:35] There are five kind of key findings that
staff found as we analyzed um the
[19:40] ordinances as it relates to the house
101 those nine factors they have asked
[19:46] us to look at. So over the last five
years [clears throat] all of our res
[19:53] that does tend to indicate to us that
our ordinances are likely updated for
[19:56] what is being constructed.
Number two,
[20:01] um none of the projects that were
approved over the last five years would
[20:05] actually get permitted in our R1 or R4
districts, which are single family
[20:10] districts.
They some of the standards would fit in
[20:14] our R5 or R six, but those are multif
family districts or single companies not
[20:18] allowed. So, we do have some
inconsistencies there. Um we do not
[20:23] permit residential in any of our
commercial districts. So when you're
[20:26] talking about mixed use and some of
those things, we are starting to see
[20:30] more communities include residential in
some of their lower impact districts,
[20:35] but we do not allow that. Our middle
housing districts are where we allow the
[20:40] most flexibility right now. Um, and
lastly, the the typologies we have our
[20:46] comprehensive plan don't line up with
our zoning district. So again just
[20:50] another inconsistency indicating that
it's time for school amendments which as
[20:56] you'll recall we have contracted with
HWC to do an update to our unified
[21:00] development ordinances
control ordinance that's something that
[21:05] has started and will be completed by the
end of next year. So a lot of the nine
[21:10] uh the items in that n those nine
categories that we've been asked to look
[21:15] at will really get analyzed deeper as
part of that process and looked at. But
[21:20] there are some recommendations that I
just want to highlight that we'll be
[21:24] looking at this year and then some of
the things that we'll analyze next year.
[21:28] So one is some process changes. Um the
plane commission um would like to look
[21:35] at establishing a plaque committee. This
is a smaller board. It takes the
[21:40] subdivision plat out of the plan
commission to the smaller committee. Um
[21:44] it allows us to be a little bit more
efficient, put some timing off on there
[21:50] and it does require us to have a minimum
of one commission member there and the
[21:54] plan commission makes the appointment to
that committee. Um it does require
[21:59] amendments to the ordinance. So we're in
the process of drafting those. Those
[22:03] would be to go to P commission and then
they would make recommendation to
[22:06] council ultimately council will make a
determination of whether or not that is
[22:10] something um that you guys want to do.
We're also recommending some things to
[22:16] expedite your development plan process.
Um right now we require public hearing
[22:21] for that. However, under state code,
we're not required to do that. So one
[22:25] that
requirement we think needs to be
[22:28] modified. And then also um under Indiana
code, the legislative body can designate
[22:34] that to the commission staff. A hearing
be committee or commission. So we're
[22:40] recommending that that be a staff
approval and that in fact we use our T
[22:45] committee which is our technical
advisory committee with our engineers
[22:48] and department heads on it to um review
those development plans. So those two
[22:54] changes will allow us um to save um a
couple of on each of those processes. So
[23:01] ultimately we could be saving developers
potentially a month if they're required
[23:05] of those.
Um for the zoning recommendations, one
[23:10] of the things that we'll be recommending
this year as part of our transition um
[23:16] we'll be bringing development changes so
that we have zoning districts for our
[23:21] Marian County properties um that we
don't a lot of legal non-conforming
[23:26] uses. And what we found is instead of a
bunch of new districts. We believe we
[23:30] can make some modifications to our R5
and R six zoning districts that will
[23:36] solve a lot of those issues. Um that
also lines up with some of those
[23:41] inconsistencies I identified in our
findings. So we'll be looking at
[23:46] allowing single family in our five and
our six and then also um modifying some
[23:52] of the speakers in there. That's
something that will be coming back to PL
[23:57] council um late fall and that this year
for consideration and that will put us
[24:04] in a good position um as we become an
excluded town January one to be able to
[24:10] administer those comprehensive
control ordinances um consistently on
[24:16] both sides post on the entire town
regardless of what county
[24:21] and then um There's many items that we
are asked to look at. Architectural
[24:26] standards, parking, um a lot of our
development standards,
[24:32] um allowing different residential
typologies.
[24:38] Those items really deserve adequate
study with our comprehensive plan
[24:43] nearing completion. It's going to go
through the approvals process this fall.
[24:48] We're preparing for this Uno transition.
We have HWC under contract to update our
[24:54] unified development ordinances. We think
if we would be if we asked you to make
[24:58] changes now, we would be reacting um to
kind of a suggestion versus doing a
[25:05] really good study to make sure we're
being consistent with what our community
[25:08] is asking us to look at and give
thoughtful study of these of what the
[25:16] standards should be in these districts.
So, we're recommending that the
[25:20] remaining items be analyzed and
considered as part of our uh update to
[25:27] the development board.
That is a quick version of highlights of
[25:34] what is in um our audit on housing. Um
ultimately, I think we have some good
[25:40] things in there with our housing, but we
also do have some things that we know we
[25:43] need to address and there are some
opportunities for efficiency. So, um,
[25:48] you're required under this new act to
hold a public hearing on this, which we
[25:53] did at commission reporting back to the
council and then we'll report to the
[25:57] state that we have this hearing and our
findings.
[26:03] » I have a couple questions.
When I reviewed the PowerPoint, I did
[26:08] have some concerns. very first one was
on
[26:14] lot sizes lot sizes
that causes me concern
[26:20] and I know it was also house bill
that was addressed as to what type of
[26:28] house it will bring the second concern
was it is odd it looks like now from R1
[26:34] to R4 now they're back to pushing double
triplexes
[26:40] that they were so against that.
And the third thing, yeah,
[26:45] » the market is the market is cyclical.
So, if you do this long enough, as many
[26:51] as of us have watched the housing
market,
[26:54] » you see what is old is new again.
>> Yeah.
[26:58] » And so I I agree. When I first started
out, you know, 25 years ago, R1 was
[27:05] single family, R2 was single family,
delex, R3 was single family, delex,
[27:09] triplex, R4, and it went on. We got to a
point where it was like all single
[27:14] family, everything else is mult.
[27:20] The other thing I thought was
interesting was on R5, R six
[27:25] » because now they're looking at rather
than having industrial zone area. Now
[27:31] we're shifting to able to put
residential in there and doing almost a
[27:37] fixed use.
I found that very interest.
[27:43] » Yeah.
You know, a lot of the things you
[27:45] brought up is one of the reasons why a
lot of those development standards we're
[27:49] recommending we take under consideration
as part of our new process that to come
[27:56] in and make a quick decision. Now, I
don't feel like we're doing the
[27:59] community justice. Um, we also haven't
adopted the comprehensive plan yet and
[28:05] we want to make sure whatever we adopt
with our standards aligns with that
[28:08] comprehensive plan. And so while these
are things that we're being asked to
[28:13] analyze, I think that's exactly what we
need to do is analyze them and then
[28:17] determine based on our community's
guidance what's appropriate for us
[28:22] » and then ultimately
if this, you know, we're going to do
[28:26] whatever the state requires of us,
>> we'll probably have a new law by next
[28:29] July anyways.
>> I know that's I guess that's where I was
[28:32] heading.
>> Yeah.
[28:34] I sit on the House Rep's summer housing
committee that is carrying this
[28:41] legislation now. It's not the same
legislator as last year. The House
[28:46] leadership, the governor's
administration moved it to the House
[28:49] Rep.
[28:55] And we were having really good
conversations, but then it moved back to
[28:58] the national agenda after
they their summer national conferences.
[29:05] So it's like they get in the chamber. So
I came back in really good collaborative
[29:10] space and then after they went to their
summer conferences they came back to
[29:14] basically 101
items.
[29:19] We're trying to work more into talking
about incentives and less about regular
[29:32] [clears throat]
[29:38] » I do think it's good to take it under
adisement and evaluating
[29:45] other things come spring.
[29:50] And when it comes to like a lot size
concern, there's lot size, there's
[29:53] density, there's also form based code
which gets away from those things, but
[29:57] it has other standards in place to get
to what you want design. So it's
[30:02] important that we look at this
comprehensively from all those different
[30:06] angles to figure out what's best for our
community instead of just automatically
[30:10] like
check something like let's do. So I'm
[30:16] not These things are necessary things we
should do. These are things that
[30:28] » Thank you so much,
[30:33] » Mr.
Consideration of 2026
[30:38] radio and ramp ADA analysis.
[30:52] That's okay.
[30:58] [clears throat]
[31:07] Analysis.
[31:10] [clears throat]
The agreement is for 21,000
[31:18] exceed 21,000 [clears throat]
walk down rail sidewalks on a five scale
[31:26] similar to scale
[31:31] also
analysis as well.
[31:38] happy answer any questions you have on
>> and when I read it I was thinking it was
[31:44] a lot more subjective than what it was
they have some decent standard on how
[31:47] they scale correct
>> yes
[31:53] what the characteristics of each
number
[32:01] » there's a national engineering standard
for the sidewalk analysis similar to
[32:06] phaser
A lot of people
[32:10] think it's a little bit more subjective.
I forced these two to do a class
[32:15] recently. So really on how
those things actually are
[32:36] » contract
Do I have any questions?
[32:41] » 21,000 is not to exceed.
[32:50] » I was just going to say it sounds
expensive to me when it's done as to
[32:54] what what they find. It's been about 15
years since we've done a complete town
[32:59] to we've been working that entire time
year about 60,000 or so you guys budget
[33:06] sidewalks but it's really time for an
update so we can refocus
[33:12] those projects
[33:21] contract.
[33:27] Will they break
will they break down just general
[33:31] repairs versus ADA
um deficiency [clears throat] or
[33:38] deficiencies in the ADA
[33:42] reports?
>> Well, it's all going to be rated within
[33:45] our GIS system the same way we do. that
five analysis will be on there, but
[33:52] those numbers like on ADA will trip
specific stuff like will be a priority
[33:56] one to do. Um, but you you have your
condition deterioration and things in
[34:02] that because that all turns into ADA is
considered because
[34:07] a tripping hazard
cracking those type of things. So, it's
[34:11] all through the lens of ADA and then
severity.
[34:15] like a general repair
[34:19] because that will become at some point
probably a trip or hazard
[34:26] » bottom line
we're completed the audit now the audit
[34:35] audit
>> yeah we're completing it right now as
[34:37] long as we have an annual plan
we're making progress towards ABA that
[34:43] we
[34:46] But how long will this take?
>> I don't know when it'll probably
[34:54] four weeks and then we'll probably
administration.
[35:15] This is an action.
[35:24] We approve the
[35:28] contract
[35:33] $21,000 about 15 $21,000
and the timing
[35:41] and sign
[35:45] motion is second compensation. All those
in favor signify by saying I I
[35:52] » no eyes out.
Thank you,
[35:55] » Mr. Lips. Looks like the rest of the
evening is yours.
[36:01] [clears throat]
[36:10] » First before you use ordinance 2026-11.
This would add several definitions to
[36:15] your code as well as some fines and a
lot of roadway and trail regulations.
[36:22] driver for this has been a lot of calls
and complaints about post calls, kids on
[36:27] scooters, emotives, things like that,
trails, neighborhoods, post calls on
[36:32] trails, post calls in the neighborhood.
Kind of defines that. It's not uh
[36:37] procluding like your typical ebikes,
things like that. It's more focused on
[36:42] some of the emotives and making sure
people that are driving on our roadways,
[36:47] that are experienced drivers train to
drive
[36:52] A lot of it doesn't repeal a whole lot
of code other than some of the parks
[36:57] code would change a little bit through
this, but there's a fine section.
[37:02] Otherwise, if we move forward with this,
we'll add new trail signage and rule
[37:07] signage entrances throughout the trail
is kind of on our radar to do anyways.
[37:12] Um we want to put these new regulations
very clearly have entrances to
[37:17] our trails.
It does regulate roadways as well
[37:25] enough to operate on the roadway and
follow all safety regulations. See more
[37:30] and more kids and I said scooters
particularly ebikes just blowing
[37:35] intersections and I get hit by cars.
So scary stuff like that.
[37:42] particularly wide spots of the trail
[37:48] of that nature
introduction tonight only.
[37:52] » You might have questions over 2026-1
did you
[37:58] read a lot of other neighborhoods?
>> I always research what's being done in
[38:04] the area. It's pretty hot issues. So
pretty much all Indiana
[38:13] recently
[38:16] recently
look at those based on complaint where
[38:22] those
[38:26] is just defining
some regulations not really procluding
[38:31] things entirely except for greens trails
sidewalks
[38:41] in those fines get some revenue back
towards
[38:44] [snorts]
>> I have a couple questions. Um, what's
[38:47] the difference between multi-use trails
and our greenway trails?
[38:52] » Multi-use trail would be like your
perimeter trails and things like that
[38:58] like you know branch corner has a trail
around the outside of it that be a
[39:01] multi-use trail whereas the greenways
are
[39:06] Py trail things are listed in there.
>> Okay.
[39:11] Just really don't know how somebody
would be able to tell the difference
[39:15] like
>> but like these scooters
[39:20] are allowed on sidewalks. They can go 15
or 20 miles hour.
[39:27] » Yeah.
>> And then I guess they're allowed on the
[39:31] multiuse trails.
Am I correct?
[39:36] » You are correct. And some of that is to
keep them out of the roadways.
[39:41] So there's certain areas where you don't
want them in the roadways.
[39:46] Transit is a thought. So that's why most
communities have gone in that direction.
[39:51] I just don't know how anybody reading it
could tell the difference like oh well
[39:57] you know multi-use trail that's they're
thinking they can get on the trail
[40:01] » but and then on the sidewalks
>> it it does break out um
[40:08] in
definitions at the top
[40:12] » the greenway specifically being trail by
trail
[40:16] » yeah I saw
>> multiuse
[40:19] » I didn't know what the multi We use
blocks.
[40:23] » Yeah. It's those groups of 8 ft or wider
that are not the designated water
[40:29] greenway trails because typically your
greenway trails are more of your large
[40:34] most interconnected network whereas a
lot of times your multi-use path is your
[40:40] off-road pedestrian cyclist safe transit
to keep people out of the roadway.
[40:45] » Okay.
>> Kind of like
[40:50] 700 or something.
>> That's right.
[40:52] » Okay.
>> That's not your major recreational
[40:55] trail. It's more of your pedestrian
cyclist. Don't be in the road here
[41:00] preferably for
>> So we put signs up or we are regular
[41:05] trails and we put you know it will list
like no.
[41:11] » Yep. We didn't break it completely out.
>> Exactly. Put everything there. We put it
[41:16] at every entrance was one of the things
I was talking with the PD about because
[41:20] they already have some confusion. So
whether you're looking at stuff already
[41:23] because a lot of our neighborhood
connectors don't have trailer rules
[41:26] coming in. So there's some people who
may never go to a trail head but use our
[41:30] trips all the time. So they're not
actually seeing those rules.
[41:34] » Yeah, I think that's a good idea.
[41:39] » Anybody else?
>> Okay. Introduction ordinance 2026-12
[41:48] policy.
>> Our briement policy we've operated under
[41:52] for years doesn't have a lot of clear
definitions and it's been not uniformly
[41:57] applied in different situations. It's an
area where there's been times complaints
[42:01] from supervisors and staff. So the aim
of this ordinance is to clean up those
[42:06] definitions and be very clear as to um
what can happen where so there's not
[42:11] debate. It also kind of tries to pull
the supervisors out of it HR. So there's
[42:16] less of that um just inter department
struggle and face within that looked at
[42:23] surrounding communities kind of what
their policies are a lotments and basic
[42:42] reason I like it very close rel
[43:04] I did like that change the policy I
thought that was more than fair
[43:13] about how many comments policy.
[43:18] Okay. Final ordinance 2026-13
adopting employee ethics policy.
[43:27] » Yes. This would kind of take some state
policies and put it into employee ethics
[43:31] policy. Further define that, expand upon
that. Um it's also part of transparency
[43:36] initiative on different processes and
takes in account historic HR complaints
[43:41] other issues as we kind of gone through
and finally HR a little bit more but the
[43:47] goal is really just transparent
government and making sure we're
[43:51] practicing things ethically up and down
clearly defining that to staff conflict
[43:57] of interest
other areas for
[44:02] you did nice job on the 16 pages.
I know the first four or five are on the
[44:09] origins itself. I mean always
to make relevant. I thought you did a
[44:14] nice job trying to break it down
different areas, different people,
[44:18] different sections, different
responsibilities
[44:21] that
[44:33] » council comments.
[44:43] Um,
I was an update on the church. Um,
[44:48] specifically
the way it looks like I've had people
[44:54] call me and are just appalled.
>> Yeah, we've been having some
[44:58] conversations about that as well.
Captain about it yesterday. He's getting
[45:03] some action with the health department
going. We start communicating with the
[45:07] chief over there that's in charge of
working with the health department.
[45:11] the sheriff's office.
>> So,
[45:15] » are making strides on that since the
fire has gotten a lot worse because
[45:18] there was a fire on the western most
building. It's really put a lot on the
[45:23] eastern most building. We know there's
some outstanding violations on current
[45:27] owner and some other factors with
current owner that be happy to talk with
[45:33] you guys about meeting oneonone basis.
[45:39] Appreciate reaching out kind of getting
that ball rolling because we were
[45:42] getting a lot of calls. I know councelor
is getting a lot of calls and I talked
[45:46] about it seeing if they could bring
resources or he could lean on the health
[45:50] department as well some of those items.
>> Can the health department the one that
[45:56] burned declar
[46:01] » they did an order today on an inspection
on the other one.
[46:05] They have a judge's signature for that
one and I think seven or eight day
[46:10] evacuation of everybody should be done
by a certain date and if it's not then
[46:14] we can go.
>> Both of them are just
[46:16] » both. Yes.
>> Yeah. The the one that had the fire is
[46:19] supposed to be empty as of now. The
other one they have several days to get
[46:23] out and then we can kind of enforce that
with the judges signature.
[46:28] » Okay.
[46:31] » Hopefully we can get them at least
there. Last time I was grass to be cut
[46:36] really bad.
>> I highly doubt [clears throat]
[46:40] » that is something that we need to get on
to Mar County about
[46:50] » we have leans and the city has leans and
it's headed towards
[46:54] » it like Indianapolis needs to cut it you
know somebody needs to cut it clean up
[47:01] trash
>> I think the tax bills
[47:14] I don't think
she's trying aggressively to sell right
[47:19] now.
[47:22] She's trying to sell
[47:26] in order to sell it.
[47:30] » So when
27 something like that. We can deal with
[47:36] that.
[47:40] » Yeah.
We can give them a certain amount of
[47:44] time. They don't get it done. We can cut
it and put on it.
[47:47] » Yeah.
[48:05] That's a good thing.
[48:14] » Just finished building cracks yesterday.
>> Excellent.
[48:22] Okay. So then the paint later
[48:30] color something else.
>> We got blue. It's not perfect match for
[48:35] the majority of the
go and paint white stripes back over
[48:42] the blue.
>> Uh then
[48:47] I talked to The most common thing I
probably wasn't about criminal justice
[48:53] stuff was about trash. We got that
worked out January 1. Everybody's
[48:58] garbage sitting in their driveway. We
have Marian County worked out with the
[49:02] city. They're still under contract for
additional two years. We have the
[49:06] documents out
[49:14] back with them. If not, my
recommendation was going
[49:19] at the end of that contract term
both sides.
[49:27] » That's not unless we do a separate
[49:32] expand.
[49:36] might
[49:40] » um I don't think we'll know something
like that until November.
[49:45] So it's it's difficult with
administration changes and a lot of
[49:49] department has also turned over the past
six months not just the mayor's office.
[49:56] a lot of people working
[50:05] office pretty much every single
department.
[50:17] » Do you think anybody else?
[50:22] » All right.
>> You're going to have Everything that was
[50:26] introduced tonight by budget
introduction
[50:31] public hearing the second
[50:40] sustainability
[50:45] We have lots of spreadsheets that
[50:57] do
[51:11] You know,
>> keep Julia