1 00:01:22,159 --> 00:01:28,000 2026 to order at 7 p.m. and ask the city recorder to call the role. 2 00:01:26,720 --> 00:01:29,920 » Council President Briggs >> here. 3 00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:31,439 » Councelor Bantos >> here. 4 00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:32,960 » Councelor Blosser >> here. 5 00:01:31,840 --> 00:01:34,799 » Councelor Fitzgerald >> here. 6 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:38,079 » Councelor Holesapple >> here. 7 00:01:35,520 --> 00:01:40,000 » Councelor Jance is excused. Councelor Schilling 8 00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:41,520 » here. Councelor Shane >> here. 9 00:01:40,479 --> 00:01:43,600 » Councelor Spivey >> here. 10 00:01:42,320 --> 00:01:47,000 » Please join me in standing for the pledge of allegiance. 11 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:53,920 Pledge >> algiance to the flag of the United 12 00:01:51,040 --> 00:02:00,079 States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under 13 00:01:57,119 --> 00:02:03,640 God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 14 00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:08,959 » All right. Thank you. Have any introductions tonight? 15 00:02:07,119 --> 00:02:13,040 » No introductions tonight, Mayor. Okay, I have a script I read before we do public 16 00:02:11,039 --> 00:02:16,640 comment. For the record, please provide us with your name and whether or not you 17 00:02:14,480 --> 00:02:20,080 live inside the city limits. You have up to 3 minutes. It's your turn to talk and 18 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:24,319 ours to listen. You are responsible for the content, even if it was written by 19 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:27,440 someone else. Please direct all comments to the mayor. Do not direct your 20 00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:31,680 comments to individual counselors, staff members, or the audience. Defamatory or 21 00:02:29,920 --> 00:02:35,360 lielist comments will not be accepted. It is expected that you'll maintain 22 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:38,480 decorum and respect for each other. A wide variety of viewers watch these 23 00:02:36,959 --> 00:02:42,400 proceedings. Therefore, we would kindly ask you refrain from the use of 24 00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:45,440 offensive language and name calling. Distractions take attention from the 25 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:48,720 speaker. The audience, city council members, and city staff are asked to 26 00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:54,400 focus on the speaker during their time by respectfully being quiet. We have 27 00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:58,959 anyone who wants to testify tonight? We have anyone on the phone? 28 00:02:56,879 --> 00:03:04,239 Not then we'll close public comment and move on to the consent agenda. 29 00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:09,519 We have uh four items on there. the July 2026 financial report, approval of the 30 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:13,920 work session minutes and council meeting minutes for July 20th, and a street 31 00:03:12,319 --> 00:03:18,000 sweeper purchase. Does anybody want to move anything off of the consent agenda 32 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:20,400 tonight? >> Move to approve. 33 00:03:18,879 --> 00:03:24,959 » Second, >> sir Schilling, seconded by councelor 34 00:03:22,159 --> 00:03:30,000 Shane. All those in favor? >> I passes unanimously. 35 00:03:27,680 --> 00:03:35,959 All right. Reports or comments from mayor and council members. Any council 36 00:03:31,920 --> 00:03:35,959 members have any reports tonight? 37 00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:42,319 All right. If not, we'll move on to reports from the city manager. 38 00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:46,239 » Thank you, Mayor Slack. Um, so we just have the one report tonight. Uh, and is 39 00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:51,120 identified in the packet. It's the League of Oregon Cities, uh, legislative 40 00:03:48,799 --> 00:03:56,560 priorities, part two. So, at the last meeting, um, we gave everyone the 2026 41 00:03:54,480 --> 00:04:00,400 member voter guide in your packet. Um, so hopefully you brought that again 42 00:03:57,920 --> 00:04:03,519 today and had opportunity to review it. um asked if the council had any 43 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:06,799 questions between meetings to go and send those to me. I didn't hear from 44 00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:10,319 anyone, so hopefully you all had an opportunity to review this. Um so 45 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:14,000 tonight is just another opportunity to begin the discussion. Um if there's 46 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:17,919 topics that you like or if there's things you feel we could cross off or if 47 00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:21,600 there's questions that you have, we can certainly um attempt to answer those 48 00:04:20,079 --> 00:04:26,080 tonight. or if not get an answer, at least identify those questions to ask 49 00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:29,520 the the leaked policy uh analysts and lobbyists um kind of 50 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:33,840 maybe some background or history to any of the topics that you want. Um and but 51 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:37,360 if if you don't have any questions, we can certainly just get to the the voting 52 00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:43,840 tonight and go through that process uh to select our top five. Again, the goal 53 00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:48,080 is by September 25th to identify our uh top five priorities of the 27, noting 54 00:04:46,320 --> 00:04:53,440 that the league staff, the lobbyists will um certainly advocate um for or 55 00:04:51,600 --> 00:05:01,280 against depending on the topic. Uh all of these 27 items as priorities going 56 00:04:56,240 --> 00:05:06,160 into the 2027 session. Um but our input uh to the league board um is gathered 57 00:05:03,759 --> 00:05:11,600 with all the other cities that vote. Um and uh they when they meet in October um 58 00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:15,520 during the league conference, they will uh take all that feedback and identify 59 00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:18,960 the top five priorities for the league lobbyists. So those will be kind of the 60 00:05:17,360 --> 00:05:22,880 areas where we'll put a lot of emphasis, a lot of lobbying into those. Um and 61 00:05:21,039 --> 00:05:26,720 then everything else as bills come up that address these certain topics, um 62 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:31,600 they will focus on those priorities as well. So with that, I'll kind of pass it 63 00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:36,160 back to you, mayor, and facilitate a discussion amongst the council. 64 00:05:33,759 --> 00:05:39,600 » Jane, quick question. So the 25th is when we have to have our stuff back to 65 00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:44,639 them. >> Is when I have to submit our voting 66 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:49,280 ballot. Um so our last meeting, I believe, is that earlier that week. Uh 67 00:05:47,199 --> 00:05:54,000 and so we can, you know, continue this discussion for the next uh two meetings 68 00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:57,199 in September. Um, but by the second meeting in September, the council has to 69 00:05:55,919 --> 00:06:01,120 pick your top five. >> Given that that you know it's not 70 00:05:59,199 --> 00:06:06,039 crushingly urgent, I'd like to have a little more time to go through some of 71 00:06:02,639 --> 00:06:06,039 these in depth. 72 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:18,199 » Councor Council Briggs >> wanted to ask a few questions about the 73 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:18,199 infrastructure funding on page 37. 74 00:06:18,240 --> 00:06:22,319 They have a uh >> what's the page number at the bottom of 75 00:06:20,479 --> 00:06:25,319 the page? 18. >> Okay. 76 00:06:26,319 --> 00:06:33,520 » And I guess the question I have is would this help us in any way with our 77 00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:37,600 finished water or our raw water and our dam? I don't really see it would help 78 00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:41,840 that. It might. There is some aquafer language in here, but how how do you see 79 00:06:39,840 --> 00:06:45,680 that affecting our situation with our water? 80 00:06:43,039 --> 00:06:50,080 » Yeah. So, um there's kind of two components to in all the infrastructure 81 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:54,560 bills. So the state has a special public works fund and we always advocate the 82 00:06:51,919 --> 00:06:58,080 league always advocates to uh retain that and and retain its funding and and 83 00:06:56,960 --> 00:07:01,599 increase the amount of funding that gets put towards that. So that's one thing 84 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:06,479 that they'll do here. But they're also looking for um expanding, you know, 85 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:09,840 different uh funding streams, adding some funding streams from the state, um 86 00:07:08,479 --> 00:07:13,680 being a little bit more flexible with that uh requirements within the 87 00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:17,440 infrastructure funding that's given. Um, so yes, I do believe that with our 88 00:07:15,919 --> 00:07:22,160 infrastructure projects, whether they be the water with our finished water like 89 00:07:19,520 --> 00:07:26,240 the James H tank or the dam project or any of our sewer or storm water 90 00:07:23,759 --> 00:07:30,720 projects, that's all encompassing within here. Um, so if if that was a priority 91 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:34,319 and infrastructure funding tends to be one of the league's priorities, at least 92 00:07:32,319 --> 00:07:37,360 has been the last couple sessions. Um, and it may be again this session because 93 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:41,120 it continues to be I know a need throughout the state of Oregon and many 94 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:45,440 of the cities. um then that's what we would really target keeping the existing 95 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:48,800 funding streams uh alive with the funding hopefully increase that if 96 00:07:47,039 --> 00:07:53,120 possible and then look at maybe some other funding sources that the state can 97 00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:57,520 create as well. I would just advocate that that would be one of our five. 98 00:07:55,599 --> 00:08:03,280 » Certainly would be. Sure would be for me. 99 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:07,680 » One of my five. So, >> well 100 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:11,440 that as the number one priority. >> Great. So, it sounds like we might get 101 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,360 some consensus around that particular topic. 102 00:08:11,919 --> 00:08:17,360 » Sounds like we just about do. >> Yeah. Are there other questions or or 103 00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:20,520 thoughts that council wants to share at this point? 104 00:08:21,919 --> 00:08:29,919 I uh I'm kind of interested in the uh public 105 00:08:27,599 --> 00:08:33,200 meeting law clarification because there are some warts in there that don't 106 00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:37,599 really make anybody any safer or better 107 00:08:35,039 --> 00:08:41,599 protected and and there's some stuff in there that really 108 00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:45,760 is from where I sit bureaucracy for bureaucracy's sake. So I would I would I 109 00:08:44,080 --> 00:08:48,760 would put some muscle behind that if I could. 110 00:08:49,920 --> 00:08:53,231 No, [laughter] 111 00:08:53,440 --> 00:08:59,360 » governor said she vetoed the bill that was passed the last session. Um, but I 112 00:08:57,440 --> 00:09:02,320 will say that that is a topic that I think um with the Oregon government 113 00:09:00,959 --> 00:09:06,160 ethics commission and their implementation of uh in their 114 00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:10,320 interpretations of public meeting laws. um the League of Oregon City and the 115 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:14,160 Oregon counties, the association of Oregon counties, the special districts 116 00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:19,440 um and others throughout the state were really pushing uh for some uh clarity in 117 00:09:17,120 --> 00:09:22,959 the public meeting laws and uh we received that through the the House bill 118 00:09:21,200 --> 00:09:27,839 that was passed this last session. Um but that was one of the few bills that 119 00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:31,360 the governor did veto. Um and so while uh we felt we had a good win, um it 120 00:09:29,680 --> 00:09:36,160 didn't survive the the governor's desk. So um I think that there will be a push 121 00:09:33,680 --> 00:09:39,279 for that again. um maybe some refinement to the bill that was passed this last 122 00:09:37,519 --> 00:09:42,240 session so that it does make its way through the governors this time. 123 00:09:40,560 --> 00:09:45,680 » And although it's it's labeled as clarity, I think part of it is 124 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:49,360 streamlining also and that's part of what I'm interested in. 125 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:53,040 » Great. >> I didn't mark this as one of my 126 00:09:51,200 --> 00:09:59,959 priorities, but I did have a question about um an acronym 127 00:09:55,920 --> 00:09:59,959 uh on page four. 128 00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:05,760 It's row r o wide of way. 129 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:08,880 » Right ofway. Yeah. So like your streets or trails, the the rideway. 130 00:10:07,839 --> 00:10:13,959 » That makes sense since it's transportation. Like what's row? 131 00:10:14,959 --> 00:10:21,839 » Um under the broadband and cyber security. 132 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:25,360 The last one was supporting municipal uh cyber security proficiency. Since we 133 00:10:23,760 --> 00:10:28,839 contract with the county for that, would we benefit from 134 00:10:28,959 --> 00:10:33,240 support municipal cyber security proficiency? 135 00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:43,760 Do we contract with the county? Do I ask for? 136 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:47,839 » Yes. Yeah. We contract with the county benefit us. 137 00:10:45,680 --> 00:10:51,519 » Yeah. I was just reading the the kind of recommendation. So the LLC opposes 138 00:10:49,519 --> 00:10:54,480 unfunded mandates and will advocate for technical support and funding to give 139 00:10:52,959 --> 00:10:57,760 all cities access to innovative technology, enhanced state programs, 140 00:10:55,839 --> 00:11:00,959 cyber security notification resources and assistance protecting critical 141 00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:04,640 infrastructure and data during cyber attacks. Um, and I was reading the 142 00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:08,959 background on it and it didn't really give me um, I think some good context. I 143 00:11:07,519 --> 00:11:15,120 don't know where this is coming from. So, for the city of Dallas, uh, we, um, 144 00:11:13,279 --> 00:11:20,079 have purchased cyber security insurance through our insurers. So, we have that, 145 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:25,200 um, as as a tool, uh, if we were subject to a cyber security attack. We contract 146 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:29,600 with Pulp County for our our um information technology work and uh they 147 00:11:28,079 --> 00:11:33,600 put in a lot of protections and securities to ensure that we're safe um 148 00:11:31,680 --> 00:11:37,440 and do a lot of testing to make sure that we don't make mistakes or that if 149 00:11:35,680 --> 00:11:41,519 we do we get trained to not make mistakes um when they're real. Um so 150 00:11:39,839 --> 00:11:46,399 we're I think as an organization on top of cyber security pretty well. Um, but I 151 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:50,240 can find out more of the the context to this if there was a specific example or 152 00:11:48,079 --> 00:11:54,640 maybe a specific statute that is preventing a city from being able to 153 00:11:52,800 --> 00:12:01,360 access something on the cyber security side. I'm just wondering if this adds or 154 00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:06,320 assist in protections if in case we uh fall prey to a cyber attack and we 155 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:11,040 get like ransomware or something that holds up our uh infrastructure in the 156 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:15,760 city if that all gets covered through the county because I'm guessing that if 157 00:12:12,959 --> 00:12:19,839 it happens to us, it happens to them. U maybe not there's potential with that. 158 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:23,760 Um the county also has their own cyber security uh insurance that they've 159 00:12:21,519 --> 00:12:27,600 purchased. Um, so again, because if if the 160 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:31,600 security issue occurred because of something that a city of Dallas employee 161 00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:34,959 did, right, through our system, um, the potential for it to reach into the 162 00:12:32,959 --> 00:12:39,200 county system is there. Um, so it could impact them as well, but our insurance 163 00:12:36,880 --> 00:12:44,720 would be liable because one of our agents caused that attack to occur. If 164 00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:48,160 the county employee, say, opened up a a cyber security issue and that made it 165 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:51,839 way into the city of Dallas, their insurance would cover the claim towards 166 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:56,160 the city of Dallas. So, um, that's how the insurance aspect of that would work. 167 00:12:53,680 --> 00:13:00,160 Um, but I don't know if this it doesn't I don't know reading it doesn't seem 168 00:12:58,079 --> 00:13:03,120 that it's saying that the funding would be for like those cyber security 169 00:13:01,519 --> 00:13:07,680 attacks, but it would be more funding for um preventative measures, right? To 170 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:14,000 prevent, you know, and and build up the the infrastructure to uh reduce the risk 171 00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:19,040 of a cyber security attack. um the the city's ability to uh respond to a cyber 172 00:13:17,279 --> 00:13:21,920 security attack with you know ransoms and and things like that that's going to 173 00:13:20,560 --> 00:13:25,040 come through the insurance that we can purchase which again the city has 174 00:13:23,279 --> 00:13:31,600 already done. So I think this is more about funding to you know give cities um 175 00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:35,680 access to tools and uh systems that will help prevent cyber security attacks. I 176 00:13:34,079 --> 00:13:39,200 can find out more of kind of the context of this if you want before the next 177 00:13:37,040 --> 00:13:43,999 meeting. This was also my number two. And I the question I have is I know the 178 00:13:41,120 --> 00:13:46,720 county handles a lot of our internal [gasps] 179 00:13:44,959 --> 00:13:49,519 uh technology, but I don't think they're involved at all in our wastewater 180 00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:54,079 treatment plant or our water treatment plant and those are all susceptible to 181 00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:57,279 potential hacking. >> So they are they cover all of our 182 00:13:55,920 --> 00:14:01,600 systems. So the county does. >> Yep. The county does. So the county 183 00:13:58,639 --> 00:14:05,199 covers all of our IT from our water treatment plant on the the west side of 184 00:14:03,519 --> 00:14:09,360 town um to our wastewater treatment plant on the east side of town and all 185 00:14:06,399 --> 00:14:12,160 of our facilities in between. Yes, >> I heard the word unfunded mandates 186 00:14:11,199 --> 00:14:15,199 somewhere in that discussion. >> Yeah, I mean at the beginning is that 187 00:14:13,519 --> 00:14:19,920 cons is there are there some issues there that a are there issues there and 188 00:14:17,519 --> 00:14:24,079 b would this address them? >> That's what I need to find out. Again, 189 00:14:21,279 --> 00:14:28,800 there's probably a a specific, you know, uh ruling or a law uh that came out that 190 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:34,160 was an unfunded mandate towards cities. Um I don't know what that is. So, I'll 191 00:14:30,160 --> 00:14:38,800 to do some research and find out. >> Hoping my colleagues would give some 192 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:44,160 thought to number 19. That's the emergency communication system 193 00:14:41,680 --> 00:14:49,760 resources. And what we're really talking about is uh dispatchers, the dispatch 194 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:57,680 centers. And what I can tell you from my training experience is uh those folks uh 195 00:14:54,720 --> 00:15:06,399 if not volunteering, they're mandated to work double shift uh or long hours. Um 196 00:15:02,959 --> 00:15:09,839 the folks there are a lot of them call in sick a lot because they're so 197 00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:19,279 overworked uh and they're the um unsung heroes of 198 00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:26,399 911. We always we talk about the police officers, the firefighters, the EMS, but 199 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:32,480 the whole 911 system is a critical function of the emergency management 200 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:40,160 system. And what they need is obviously more staffing, uh more uh technology, 201 00:15:37,839 --> 00:15:46,240 um and and things like that to better operate that 911 system to make it 202 00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:51,120 better than what it is right now. So, if you haven't looked at number 19, maybe 203 00:15:49,040 --> 00:15:56,000 then take a look at that. Give it some thoughts and I'd be interested to hear 204 00:15:53,680 --> 00:15:59,120 what other people think. This address that directly this the way they have it 205 00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:07,519 worded. >> Well, I believe it would. I mean, I 206 00:16:03,519 --> 00:16:13,360 I believe it's addressed to um look at the dispatch services, the 207 00:16:10,959 --> 00:16:18,160 fundamental system that supports a public safety. Yeah, 208 00:16:16,320 --> 00:16:19,759 » Carlos, that was my number two on my list. 209 00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:22,880 » Um, >> thanks for that. I'm going to read up on 210 00:16:21,040 --> 00:16:28,639 it in detail. >> And that was number five for me. 211 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:32,560 » 13. Are you're saying 19? Which page? >> Page the bottom of page 13. 212 00:16:30,399 --> 00:16:36,880 » It's page 13. Bottom of page 13. Yeah. >> Yeah. 213 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:39,519 » I just uh called out as number 19. If that's a little bit easier to follow it 214 00:16:39,120 --> 00:16:44,480 that way. >> I just don't Where are you getting 19? 215 00:16:41,759 --> 00:16:49,600 He he numbered himself. Yeah, >> I follow the 19th one down here 216 00:16:47,519 --> 00:16:53,759 » in the Carlos numeration system. >> Yeah, in my world 217 00:16:51,519 --> 00:16:57,360 » it it matches my enumeration system as well, Carlos. So, 218 00:16:55,279 --> 00:17:01,759 » okay. All right. We don't all >> Great way to do it, 219 00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:06,559 » too. Brian, on page 10, uh there's the uh 220 00:17:05,120 --> 00:17:11,439 discussion about community energy resilience and disaster planning. And uh 221 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:16,880 could you talk a little bit about how that would impact Dallas? I know we 222 00:17:13,839 --> 00:17:22,919 occasionally lose power and other infrastructure items and would this be 223 00:17:19,199 --> 00:17:22,919 beneficial to the city. 224 00:17:36,880 --> 00:17:43,840 » Yeah. So um the recommendation from the league here is to uh engage in some 225 00:17:41,520 --> 00:17:48,720 efforts to provide planning resources technical assistance and funding um for 226 00:17:46,640 --> 00:17:52,720 those uh natural disasters which cause you know energy shortages or 227 00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:57,679 disruptions. Um so yes uh the city of Dallas has um you know been impacted 228 00:17:55,520 --> 00:18:03,120 through natural disasters and you know ice storms, wind um you know other 229 00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:06,559 events that that cause uh power outages you know in and around Dallas. And so, 230 00:18:04,799 --> 00:18:10,400 yes, I think anything that would give additional resources, technical 231 00:18:08,559 --> 00:18:15,440 assistance, you know, some funding to be able to kind of harden your system, um, 232 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:19,360 could be a benefit to Dallas. >> Councelor Spy, did you look at uh, 233 00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:23,360 maintaining affordable energy while supporting grid hardening and 234 00:18:20,799 --> 00:18:27,760 modernization? I would I would think that I looked more 235 00:18:25,919 --> 00:18:33,600 at that one than the one that you just talked about. It's on page 11, 236 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:38,440 my eye, too. It had a little bit more teeth in it than the and a little more 237 00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:38,440 direction. 238 00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:47,039 14 is more directed towards the the hardening of your systems where the 239 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:53,160 first one that council sp in includes more the planning piece and you know 240 00:18:49,360 --> 00:18:53,160 thinking of it that way. 241 00:18:55,440 --> 00:18:58,919 » I could be sued 242 00:18:59,840 --> 00:19:07,760 since I have your attention. So, um, back up to general government committee. 243 00:19:05,360 --> 00:19:13,520 Uh, I don't did everybody look into the administrative procedure act reform. 244 00:19:10,720 --> 00:19:19,039 Um, the administrators that act took place in 1972 and has not 245 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:24,720 been updated in many years. And we've noticed this dealing with the reservoir. 246 00:19:22,080 --> 00:19:28,640 The the rules that govern the different agencies throughout the state play by 247 00:19:27,280 --> 00:19:32,720 different rules. And we get different answers from every agency. And that's 248 00:19:30,640 --> 00:19:37,200 what that one is looking at is trying to put the agencies under one playing field 249 00:19:35,679 --> 00:19:40,080 so that if they're making a ruling, they're not ruling against something 250 00:19:38,400 --> 00:19:43,440 else, they have to communicate a little bit a lot more. 251 00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:50,960 » Sounds like it might help break down some silos a little bit, too. 252 00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:56,960 » So limits the u use of emergency orders. It helps a little too. 253 00:19:54,799 --> 00:20:01,919 » Well, and that's the big where I've kind of gotten back to it. Um 254 00:20:00,080 --> 00:20:05,840 The regulatory breakdown directly impacts local governments when 255 00:20:03,760 --> 00:20:09,600 uncoordinated state agencies issue overlapping conflicting rules, cities 256 00:20:07,679 --> 00:20:14,480 are left trapped in the middle, forced to navigate a ma maze of contradictory 257 00:20:11,840 --> 00:20:17,919 mandates that drain municipal staff of time and stretch city budgets. 258 00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:21,840 Furthermore, recent court rulings have stripped away traditional checks on 259 00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:25,280 administrative reach. Cities have lost the ability to challenge flawed 260 00:20:23,360 --> 00:20:29,919 one-sizefits-all state regulations that ignore local realities. And the other 261 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:36,919 part of this is it brings the public back into the commenting instead of it 262 00:20:32,320 --> 00:20:36,919 just being an emergency act. 263 00:20:37,760 --> 00:20:42,960 » Obviously, I don't have a vote, so I'm not going to comment on whether or not 264 00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:47,200 this would be in my top five, but um this is certainly something that Dallas 265 00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:50,880 has had to encounter. Um, and in other cities I've been in where, you know, 266 00:20:48,559 --> 00:20:53,200 you're working with a state agency on uh, you know, maybe they're the ones 267 00:20:51,919 --> 00:20:56,720 that are offering the permit, but it's being reviewed by four other agencies 268 00:20:54,559 --> 00:20:59,360 and the other agencies give conflicting information with what the agency are 269 00:20:57,919 --> 00:21:03,360 trying to get the permits from. So, it can really be a challenge um, working 270 00:21:00,880 --> 00:21:06,559 through this. And so, uh, this this act, while I think well intended, has not 271 00:21:04,799 --> 00:21:09,840 been touched in many years and could probably use a refresh. 272 00:21:07,919 --> 00:21:13,880 » That sounds vaguely like some stuff we're dealing with right now. 273 00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:37,200 So, if you don't have anything else, um I'm glad that you've dove into this 274 00:21:34,480 --> 00:21:42,080 document. Um so, our next meeting is on September 8th. I'm not here that night, 275 00:21:39,120 --> 00:21:46,559 but um Emily will be um staffing the the council that night. So, uh certainly get 276 00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:54,400 your questions to me. I will be here up until the 8th. I'm I'm leaving that day. 277 00:21:49,360 --> 00:21:58,080 Um, and so, uh, but, um, I will work to get those answers, um, to any questions 278 00:21:56,240 --> 00:22:03,520 that you have between now and then. Um, and then Emily will come with those 279 00:21:59,440 --> 00:22:07,919 answers, uh, that night. So, anything else on this for tonight? 280 00:22:06,240 --> 00:22:11,799 All right. Are we ready to move on? >> Sounds like it. 281 00:22:08,799 --> 00:22:11,799 » Okay. 282 00:22:14,880 --> 00:22:19,559 All right. We're ready for first reading of ordinances. 283 00:22:20,880 --> 00:22:27,039 Ordinance 1926. >> First one is ordinance 1926. 284 00:22:24,640 --> 00:22:30,480 » Ordinance 1926 is an ordinance pertaining to the granting a 285 00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:35,840 non-exclusive franchise agreement to Spectrum Pacific West LLC, an indirect 286 00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:38,840 subsidiary of Charter Communications Incorporated. 287 00:22:40,640 --> 00:22:48,320 to go >> is so this is um a renewal of a 288 00:22:45,280 --> 00:22:52,799 franchise agreement with uh Spectrum or charter uh however you whichever way you 289 00:22:50,240 --> 00:22:58,559 want to look at that. Um and so during the committee uh meeting there were two 290 00:22:55,840 --> 00:23:03,120 uh uh things that they wanted to have us look at and and negotiate um with this 291 00:23:01,440 --> 00:23:09,679 agreement. Both of those are included in the agreement. Uh the first was um 292 00:23:06,159 --> 00:23:14,400 getting the insurance uh rates um to mirror better the the other agreement in 293 00:23:12,640 --> 00:23:18,000 that we're going to consider tonight. And so the movement that we were able to 294 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:23,600 get was under the commercial general liability. Um the proposal that the 295 00:23:21,600 --> 00:23:26,799 committee looked at was a $1 million per occurrence and a 2 million general 296 00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:31,840 aggregate. They increase their general aggregate to 3 million which marries up 297 00:23:28,960 --> 00:23:36,240 with the other document. Um and then the other section was section D under 298 00:23:33,919 --> 00:23:39,120 insurance. This is on page 60 where it says the grantee shall require 299 00:23:37,520 --> 00:23:42,720 contractors and subcontractors working on granties behalf to maintain adequate 300 00:23:41,039 --> 00:23:48,400 insurance related to their work in the franchise area. So um the committee was 301 00:23:46,320 --> 00:23:52,799 uh this provision did not initially exist but we wanted to make sure that 302 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:57,120 the subcontractors um of the franchisee also maintain insurance uh for the work 303 00:23:54,880 --> 00:24:03,400 that they're doing. So, um, so that's the language that, uh, staff and the 304 00:23:59,440 --> 00:24:03,400 company agreed on. 305 00:24:03,919 --> 00:24:11,200 » Questions on that ordinance? If not, I'll declare it pass it first 306 00:24:08,640 --> 00:24:19,440 reading. And second, next one is ordinance number 1927. 307 00:24:14,880 --> 00:24:24,720 to 1927 is um an ordinance granting to Forged Fiber 37 308 00:24:22,559 --> 00:24:28,960 LLC the right to construct, operate, and maintain telecommunication services in 309 00:24:26,400 --> 00:24:33,840 the city of Dallas, Oregon. So, this was another franchise agreement uh that the 310 00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:40,320 comm admin committee looked at just a few weeks ago. Um the the there wasn't a 311 00:24:38,159 --> 00:24:45,600 change to the insurance uh limits in this one, but the uh committee did want 312 00:24:43,120 --> 00:24:49,760 the similar language uh regarding the contractors to be included here. Um when 313 00:24:48,080 --> 00:24:56,240 this report was written, we were still working with the the company on some 314 00:24:52,960 --> 00:25:02,640 language uh that they were agreeable to. So if you go to the insurance section on 315 00:24:58,880 --> 00:25:06,240 page uh two and three um 316 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:12,799 under uh section 317 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:21,760 yeah under section 4 subsection two we'll add section E um or no sorry after 318 00:25:19,919 --> 00:25:27,600 subsection three under four. So sub so section 4 319 00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:33,919 subsection 4. So after section subsection 3 we would add this language 320 00:25:30,159 --> 00:25:37,520 which um we agreed to today which is companies shall require contractors and 321 00:25:35,600 --> 00:25:40,559 subcontractors working on this company's behalf to maintain adequate insurance 322 00:25:39,279 --> 00:25:47,120 related to the company's work in the right of way. So again allowing um 323 00:25:45,120 --> 00:25:52,400 contractor requiring contractors and subcontractors working on the company's 324 00:25:49,760 --> 00:25:56,159 behalf or the the franchisee uh to maintain adequate insurance related to 325 00:25:53,919 --> 00:25:59,760 the company's work in the rightway. So that's the language that we would 326 00:25:57,840 --> 00:26:04,960 include before your second reading. >> What is adequate? 327 00:26:02,799 --> 00:26:09,360 Shouldn't there be a number there? 100 1 million 2 million. 328 00:26:06,480 --> 00:26:13,760 » That's fine. So in this one it says 2 million per three in the aggregate and 329 00:26:11,760 --> 00:26:17,960 in the other contract we had 1 million and three. Why the difference 330 00:26:18,559 --> 00:26:24,240 state contracting rules are one and two. >> So I'm just 331 00:26:22,720 --> 00:26:28,080 » and this is two and three and the other one is so my yeah I get that they're 332 00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:30,400 higher but why are they different is my question. 333 00:26:28,559 --> 00:26:35,840 » So because that's what they offered right and that's what we agreed to. So, 334 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:39,200 um, the initial agreement in the other agreement that we looked at, um, the 335 00:26:37,600 --> 00:26:43,840 initial proposal was 1 million and 2 million, which is the state minimum 336 00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:48,880 requirements. Um, we're trying to move all of our contracts to at least one and 337 00:26:46,400 --> 00:26:53,520 three or two and three. Um, the company on the other agreement, um, Spectrum was 338 00:26:51,600 --> 00:26:57,868 willing to increase their aggregate to three, but they wanted to keep the 1 339 00:26:54,880 --> 00:27:01,039 million for per occurrence. Um, I felt [clears throat] that was fine. Um, so 340 00:26:59,279 --> 00:27:06,000 that's what we just did on the first reading for they already offered two and 341 00:27:03,120 --> 00:27:10,240 three with this company here. Um, so we weren't proposing a change. Um, I don't 342 00:27:08,559 --> 00:27:13,440 think that we need to include the language under contractors and 343 00:27:11,760 --> 00:27:17,679 subcontractors. Um, because that's really between the contractor, 344 00:27:15,440 --> 00:27:20,400 subcontractor, and the franchisee. Um, so whatever the franchisee is going to 345 00:27:19,120 --> 00:27:25,360 require for the work that they're doing for them is what they they will require. 346 00:27:22,799 --> 00:27:31,120 Um, we're going to require the insurance to be the two and three. So if there's a 347 00:27:27,919 --> 00:27:35,679 claim from us on the franchisee, we would be under the 2 million 3 million 348 00:27:32,559 --> 00:27:40,320 limits um with this agreement. >> The other thing is the the reason we 349 00:27:37,840 --> 00:27:44,720 talked about the subcontractors and the their push back on that and I think it's 350 00:27:42,159 --> 00:27:48,559 it's correct is the subcontractor's insurance kind of depends on their scope 351 00:27:46,240 --> 00:27:52,000 of work. If a subcontractor is doing a, you know, a very small job, they 352 00:27:50,159 --> 00:27:59,200 wouldn't necessarily require the same insurance limits, which is why that one 353 00:27:54,399 --> 00:28:02,640 is a little more um ambiguous. But the the key thing is it's ambiguous, but 354 00:28:01,039 --> 00:28:05,760 it's on the franchisee to make sure it's enough 355 00:28:03,679 --> 00:28:11,039 » and it still satisfies the state requirements. 356 00:28:07,760 --> 00:28:14,480 » Our reaches to the franchisee, not the subcontractor. Their reach is to the 357 00:28:13,039 --> 00:28:19,760 subcontractor because we don't have a contract with the subcontractor. So if 358 00:28:17,600 --> 00:28:23,679 they don't want to in increase it higher, that's their prerogative. They 359 00:28:22,159 --> 00:28:26,480 would have to cover it up to two to three. 360 00:28:24,320 --> 00:28:31,360 » I think it's good for us to have language that, you know, puts a nod to 361 00:28:28,799 --> 00:28:34,480 the franchisee saying, "Hey, we want your subcontractors to make sure they 362 00:28:32,720 --> 00:28:37,919 have insurance." Um, but it's really up to them on the limits that they're going 363 00:28:35,760 --> 00:28:40,799 to require. Um, you know, if we didn't have that language, you know, there's 364 00:28:39,360 --> 00:28:45,279 nothing that says that the franchisee would uh tell a subcontractor they had 365 00:28:42,559 --> 00:28:48,960 to get insurance. Um, so I I feel good knowing that we're requiring the 366 00:28:47,279 --> 00:28:52,080 subcontractors to have some level of insurance and leaving it up to the 367 00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:54,880 franchisee based on based on the scope of work for the project that they're 368 00:28:53,279 --> 00:28:58,389 doing. >> If legal thinks the word adequate's 369 00:28:56,640 --> 00:29:01,520 fine, I just I'm concerned about these [snorts] 370 00:28:59,600 --> 00:29:05,200 vans from out of state license plates rolling up in front of your house to put 371 00:29:03,200 --> 00:29:08,480 your service in. And these guys are contracted from, you know, they're who 372 00:29:07,120 --> 00:29:14,080 knows whether they're licensed or not and who knows whether they're insured or 373 00:29:10,080 --> 00:29:19,200 not. If if we if if you say that our agreements with the franchise and that's 374 00:29:17,360 --> 00:29:23,120 the number that we can go after if they cause damage, then I'm okay with that. 375 00:29:21,360 --> 00:29:27,919 But I'm really concerned about all the non 376 00:29:24,399 --> 00:29:33,360 » and and it is and if if there's a drop there, then they would be the franchisee 377 00:29:30,720 --> 00:29:37,360 would be liable to the city for not ensuring that the insurance was proper 378 00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:43,080 by their subcontractors. >> Franchisee that would be on the hook. 379 00:29:39,600 --> 00:29:43,080 » Yes. Any 380 00:29:44,240 --> 00:29:50,320 more questions on that ordinance? >> So, just before you declare it to pass 381 00:29:48,799 --> 00:29:56,080 it first reading, so we will incorporate that language um under subsection 382 00:29:53,520 --> 00:30:01,760 uh four of section 4 for your second reading. 383 00:29:59,039 --> 00:30:07,200 » All right, we'll declare it to pass it first reading. Then let's move on to 384 00:30:04,000 --> 00:30:12,880 ordinance number 1928. >> Thank you, mayor. Ordinance 1928 is an 385 00:30:10,159 --> 00:30:16,320 ordinance related to background checks for city employees, volunteers, certain 386 00:30:14,799 --> 00:30:20,960 vendors, and participants in city programs. So, this is the first time the 387 00:30:18,880 --> 00:30:27,520 council um any council members are seeing this uh ordinance. It's um coming 388 00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:32,880 before you because there's uh some rules within the law enforcement database 389 00:30:29,200 --> 00:30:37,039 system um which is uh the system used to do criminal background checks and and 390 00:30:34,720 --> 00:30:42,240 things of that nature. Um, so in order for us to uh conduct background checks 391 00:30:40,080 --> 00:30:44,960 for these purposes, um, because you're supposed to only use leads for law 392 00:30:43,360 --> 00:30:49,360 enforcement purposes, you have to have an ordinance on the books to to do these 393 00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:53,039 types of background checks. So um, that's really what the ordinance is 394 00:30:50,640 --> 00:30:59,799 about is just enabling us to continue to do background checks the way we have um, 395 00:30:55,279 --> 00:30:59,799 for these certain types of checks. 396 00:30:59,919 --> 00:31:06,080 And this would be part of the municipal code if it were to be approved by the 397 00:31:03,120 --> 00:31:09,520 council. Are we exposed in any way because we don't have this on the books 398 00:31:08,159 --> 00:31:14,399 now? >> Uh I don't think there's um any risk of 399 00:31:12,320 --> 00:31:17,679 anything that we've done. Um but it would be something that if we don't pass 400 00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:24,000 an ordinance then we can no longer continue to do background checks for uh 401 00:31:20,480 --> 00:31:26,880 uh employees who have um we we can't do a background check on someone that makes 402 00:31:25,279 --> 00:31:30,080 application but we can do some a background check on someone that has 403 00:31:28,399 --> 00:31:33,760 received an offer from us right for employment. So that would be the 404 00:31:31,120 --> 00:31:37,919 employee side. um you know, volunteers, certain vendors who will work with uh in 405 00:31:36,159 --> 00:31:41,840 areas that do law enforcement, you know, data, have that information there. Um 406 00:31:40,240 --> 00:31:44,320 so, yes, we want to we want to be able to continue to do that, but in order to 407 00:31:43,120 --> 00:31:46,960 do that, we have to have this. I don't think there's any liability moving 408 00:31:45,440 --> 00:31:49,360 backwards, but if we don't pass this, then we'll have to stop doing those 409 00:31:48,080 --> 00:31:54,640 background checks. >> The difference between how we've been 410 00:31:52,000 --> 00:31:59,760 doing them in the past and what we're expected to do in the future. Chief 411 00:31:58,000 --> 00:32:03,600 Mont, I don't know if you if if I say anything wrong, feel free to come up and 412 00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:09,120 and correct me. I don't think the process of doing a background check will 413 00:32:05,679 --> 00:32:15,120 change. Um we'll continue to uh you know, pull the the same information. Um 414 00:32:11,919 --> 00:32:18,480 what what we will do is uh and I specify in the agreement here a little bit. Um 415 00:32:17,360 --> 00:32:22,159 you know, there are certain things that we will look for. or we will craft an 416 00:32:19,840 --> 00:32:26,480 administrative policy that will say, you know, if if we find these things through 417 00:32:24,159 --> 00:32:30,640 the criminal background check. Um then the police department will give a 418 00:32:27,919 --> 00:32:34,880 recommendation of um recommend or do not recommend um to the uh you know hiring 419 00:32:33,760 --> 00:32:39,679 manager if that's what we're doing the background check for. Um and so the the 420 00:32:38,080 --> 00:32:45,039 specificity of that is going to be outlined in policy. Um but yes, we'll 421 00:32:43,120 --> 00:32:48,480 » Is that is that not how we're doing things? So now 422 00:32:46,799 --> 00:32:51,120 » it's it's similar. Chief, you want to maybe come up and I'm probably maybe 423 00:32:50,480 --> 00:32:55,840 missing a new one. >> This appearing simply for a because 424 00:32:52,720 --> 00:33:01,039 there was a change in the ORS and O. >> It's a change from the leads policy 425 00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:06,640 itself. So, >> afternoon. This is housekeeping. Um, 426 00:33:04,720 --> 00:33:10,080 every year we get audited by leads and for the past couple decades they had no 427 00:33:08,320 --> 00:33:14,080 problem with us doing these backgrounds along with numerous other cities. Um 428 00:33:12,480 --> 00:33:19,039 this time they decided we need to have an ordinance and we need to have a 429 00:33:16,000 --> 00:33:23,440 defined criteria for a recommend or do not recommend to pass our leads audit. 430 00:33:21,360 --> 00:33:27,840 If we don't have if we don't pass our leads audit that could theory strip away 431 00:33:25,519 --> 00:33:31,200 our ability to access leads. So we either have to have this ordinance or we 432 00:33:29,600 --> 00:33:35,640 have to stop doing criminal histories on backgrounds. One of the two 433 00:33:36,240 --> 00:33:43,120 » choice there really >> choice. What is uh certain contracted 434 00:33:40,720 --> 00:33:46,559 vendors and appointed city volunteers? What would that entail? 435 00:33:44,960 --> 00:33:50,559 » So if we if we have a contractor come in to 436 00:33:48,960 --> 00:33:54,399 work in the buildings, especially on the siege side on the police side, we do a 437 00:33:52,960 --> 00:33:59,600 criminal history check on them to make sure they're okay to be in that area and 438 00:33:57,200 --> 00:34:04,320 access that area unsupervised. That would be a type of vendor that we do. 439 00:34:01,519 --> 00:34:07,519 Another one would be an IT person from the county. We we have to do criminal 440 00:34:06,000 --> 00:34:11,839 history background checks on those to get them authorized to access our 441 00:34:09,599 --> 00:34:16,720 systems as well. Vendors would be the ones that we do uh criminal histories on 442 00:34:13,839 --> 00:34:21,040 like all CC uh vendors. So when we have a vendor doing work, we ask their 443 00:34:19,119 --> 00:34:25,720 employees to fill us paperwork out. They know ahead of time we're doing the 444 00:34:22,320 --> 00:34:25,720 background check. 445 00:34:26,320 --> 00:34:32,159 » Yes. Everybody that's exposed to this fills out a document, agrees to it, and 446 00:34:30,240 --> 00:34:35,040 signs for it. It's the ride alongs run here. That is 447 00:34:33,839 --> 00:34:38,800 that new? >> It's not new. If we let someone do a 448 00:34:36,960 --> 00:34:42,919 ride along in our patrol vehicles, we run a background check on them. 449 00:34:43,359 --> 00:34:52,119 » So, it really is just housekeeping. >> It's exactly what we've been doing with 450 00:34:47,119 --> 00:34:52,119 a ordinance that goes with it. 451 00:34:53,760 --> 00:34:59,920 » Right. We're and we're not the only city. There are a bunch of us out there 452 00:34:57,760 --> 00:35:06,000 that have to do some housekeeping on this this audit cycle. 453 00:35:03,359 --> 00:35:12,160 » Just for clarity, chief, anyone that has any access to a terminal that has sieges 454 00:35:09,200 --> 00:35:15,040 information has to be cleared. Correct. That's why you have to do it for right 455 00:35:13,280 --> 00:35:20,000 alongs because you have NDTs in the cars and have to be cleared to be access in 456 00:35:18,480 --> 00:35:24,160 the same access point as that terminal to actually access the terminal. It it 457 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:27,760 goes beyond what this does. Um, this wasn't wouldn't affect that, but we 458 00:35:25,520 --> 00:35:30,480 fingerprint them and and do all kinds of stuff. So, 459 00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:32,640 » guess my concern is are we telling these folks, we're going to do a background 460 00:35:31,839 --> 00:35:35,280 check on you? >> Yes. Yes. 461 00:35:33,839 --> 00:35:39,040 » So, they know like, oh, maybe I don't want to work in your building, 462 00:35:36,640 --> 00:35:42,079 » right? Yeah. And we've had that. That's okay. 463 00:35:40,400 --> 00:35:45,200 » Don't want to go on a ride along. >> We've had that, too. And that's okay. 464 00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:48,880 » Okay. >> Hearing is that we're not really 465 00:35:46,880 --> 00:35:53,920 changing anything in the way we do business. We're just putting in writing, 466 00:35:51,200 --> 00:35:58,240 » right? We're just uh they've they've decided that we weren't in we're not in 467 00:35:56,160 --> 00:36:01,920 compliance along with a bunch of other government entities, 468 00:36:00,400 --> 00:36:05,920 right? And we're getting into compliance. If we don't comply, then we 469 00:36:03,760 --> 00:36:09,119 can't do it. If we continue to do it, they take away our access to that 470 00:36:07,599 --> 00:36:12,160 system, which means if something was stolen, we couldn't put it in the system 471 00:36:10,640 --> 00:36:16,880 as stolen. So, 472 00:36:13,520 --> 00:36:21,359 » and how many years or months and how many how long do you have to hold on to 473 00:36:19,599 --> 00:36:24,480 this paperwork? >> I'd have to look at the ordinance. It's 474 00:36:22,800 --> 00:36:28,320 it's written into there. >> Is that something new, too? 475 00:36:26,480 --> 00:36:31,320 » The the retention's not new. >> Okay. 476 00:36:33,760 --> 00:36:39,760 » Other questions for Chief Mock? 477 00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:44,560 » The retention's three years. Councelor Bus 478 00:36:41,440 --> 00:36:48,000 for a for a non non-hire rights for forever for a or for 479 00:36:46,800 --> 00:36:51,280 » Okay. >> Yeah. So like for a vendor or volunteer 480 00:36:49,520 --> 00:36:54,280 is three years. For a hire it's permanent. 481 00:36:56,960 --> 00:37:00,280 » Thank you. 482 00:37:03,280 --> 00:37:10,240 » All right. Any more questions on ordinance 1928? 483 00:37:08,560 --> 00:37:17,200 Not all declare it passed its first reading. Let's move on to resolutions. 484 00:37:12,960 --> 00:37:23,200 Uh resolution 3577 repealing resolution 3440. 485 00:37:19,520 --> 00:37:28,880 » Yep. Thank you. Um so resolution 3440 was a resolution that established the 486 00:37:25,760 --> 00:37:32,640 stop sign on northbound 11s at the intersection of Ellendell. Um so you 487 00:37:31,200 --> 00:37:37,119 remember when we did a temporary measure to uh help the traffic flow there before 488 00:37:34,880 --> 00:37:41,200 we signalized that intersection. Um we adopted a resolution to install that 489 00:37:38,880 --> 00:37:44,400 stop sign. Uh now that the signal is there um there's no need for the stop 490 00:37:42,960 --> 00:37:48,240 signs. In fact the stop signs don't exist anymore. So um we're we are 491 00:37:46,720 --> 00:37:51,680 repealing the resolution that established that northbound stop sign. 492 00:37:50,079 --> 00:37:55,839 We don't have a resolution for the east west stop signs. Um those have been 493 00:37:53,920 --> 00:38:01,839 around long enough uh that they didn't have a resolution. And so, uh, this 494 00:37:57,920 --> 00:38:06,240 resolution simply repeals 3440. Um, we're just doing some cleanup work on 495 00:38:03,680 --> 00:38:10,720 the records. >> Questions? If not, I'll ask the city 496 00:38:08,480 --> 00:38:13,200 recorder to take a roll call vote. >> Councelor Spivey, 497 00:38:11,760 --> 00:38:14,880 » yes. >> Council President Briggs, 498 00:38:14,480 --> 00:38:17,280 » yes. >> Councelor Berentos, 499 00:38:16,240 --> 00:38:18,800 » yes. >> Councelor Blosser, 500 00:38:18,400 --> 00:38:21,920 » yes. >> Councelor Fitzgerald, Council Holes 501 00:38:21,359 --> 00:38:24,400 Apple, >> yes. 502 00:38:23,359 --> 00:38:25,680 » Councelor Schilling, >> yes. 503 00:38:24,800 --> 00:38:29,680 » Councelor Shane, >> yes. 504 00:38:27,520 --> 00:38:34,880 All right, it passes unanimously. Is there any other discussion tonight? 505 00:38:32,480 --> 00:38:37,880 Not, we'll declare the meeting closed at 7:37.