February meeting. If you would please
stand, we'll do the pledge to the
>> flag
to the flag of the United States of
America and to the republic for which it
stands. One nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice
for all.
>> Thank you.
Roll call, please.
>> Mr. Whitehead,
>> here.
>> Present.
>> Mr. Mr.
present.
>> Mr.
>> Here,
>> Mr. R
>> here.
>> Mr.
>> Here,
>> Mr. Burg
>> here.
>> Approval of the January 14th minutes.
Any additions or corrections, please?
>> Uh, yes. I'd like to correct the uh
approval of minutes. That's should have
been December the 10th,
2025.
And another correction um that was
requested by Scrubal was to remove
February 11th, 2026 from the top with
January minutes and title the document
January 14th, 2026
just to clarify what the document is.
Correct. But here,
so at the January 14th meeting, we had a
motion to September 10th, 2025.
Okay.
It's because of the way that the
document is. I think that so when we
switch it to the new way, I think it'll
be a lot easier to
>> Well,
with those two corrections, I'd like to
make a motion to approve the minutes.
>> Second. Have a motion to force properly.
Second. Roll call, please.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Mr. Hamilton.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Mr. Christie. Yes, Mr.
>> Yes.
>> The tableabling of the Hog Creek
reconstruction. Mr. Surveyor.
>> Yeah, we tabled the task one order from
uh Lockam Group on the Pog Creek
Reconstruction
last week. I think uh Mr. Christie made
that motion. So, this is where we're at
now. I don't know if he's got more
questions or if they've been answered
and we can go from there.
And Lock Mueller is here. If you'd like
to have them make an update
address,
>> please.
>> I think might be most appropriate to
just I'm going to make a motion to
approve the task for.
>> Do you want to have L Miller make their
um
>> I think I'm Don't we want to approve the
task order first?
>> Sure.
>> Okay. I second that motion to approve
the task
first. First, before you get ahead of
yourself, it's on the table, right?
>> You have to remove it from the table.
>> I make a motion to remove the item from
the table.
>> Second.
>> Have a motion before properly second.
Roll call, please.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
>> Yes. Mr. Christie.
>> Yes.
>> Thank you, Mr.
>> Now, Mr. Christie, would you like to
make your motion to approve the task
order?
That sounds like you just did. So, I'll
second it.
>> Okay. Thank you.
>> I have a motion before properly. Second.
Roll call.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Mr. Hson.
>> Yes.
>> Commissioner.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> You proceed, please.
>> Good morning, everyone. I'm Angie Moyer.
I'm a project manager with Lock Miller
Group. I also have my senior engineer
here with me, Erin Winger, and my area
manager, Anthony Goodnight, back here. I
think you've all met him. Um, I thought
I'd just summarize our task order and
then um, answer any questions you may
have. Um, so this is an hourly task
order not to exceed 49,200.
And the scope of services that will be
included are a kickoff meeting including
a site visit,
reviewing existing data, delineate
drainage areas, estimate potential flow
for the area, prepare hydraulic
modeling, develop two alternatives,
including exhibits, preliminary
estimates, hydraulic modeling for
alternatives. Identify potential utility
conflicts, prepare drainage
reconstruction report, identify
potential environmental impacts, and
summarize permitting requirements. And
this will also include a topographical
survey.
» Other questions?
No, I don't think
>> Hey, Angie, when you when you delineate
the area of the waterhed or of the small
ditch as it is now, that can potentially
be a larger area than like what we have
right here on this map that you gave us.
Is that correct?
>> I'm going to let you technical person on
this. So,
>> yeah, that's absolutely going to be a
bigger area than Well, I know it's going
to be bigger than the red area. I was
just wondering
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It'll be a lot larger
than
>> it could potentially even go like a mile
or
>> Yeah, it's going to be a couple square
miles of area.
>> That's perfectly That's what I was thinking. I appreciate
it. Thank you.
>> That's the survey limits that you're
>> Yeah.
This I I know it wasn't this red
area. I know this is where we're
starting at, but when we delineate that
watershed or what goes into that
>> side ditch, if you will, uh I was just
making sure that we're going to
>> expand it out. Thank you. I actually do
have a couple questions. Um, what's lock
Mueller's role during construction?
» Yeah. So, this task order doesn't
include um any services, but we can
provide whatever services you want at
that time.
How many days, months you think it might
take?
Well, depending on weather, you know, so
we can get a good survey for you and um
capture, you know, all the different
features in the area. Our goal is to
provide you a draft in 45 days from
notice to
you have a section
um
about services that are not provided.
There's 15 items on that list. Um, can
you elaborate on why that list was
included and are there things within
that list that we would need to get
someone else to do?
Um, so everything that's included in
that list we could potentially uh
provide for you if needed, but they're
not necessarily all needed at this time.
Um this first task order uh covers up to
you know providing that reconstruction
report doing all the hydraologic and
hydraulic calculations
um to come up with two alternatives and
this includes uh a potential evaluation
of extending that ditch further to the
south um as Rose requested. So at this
point we don't know like if you need to
replace culverts or if it's just going
to be ditch work. So, we don't want to
um have a scope of services and and be
charging you a fee for work that maybe
you don't need um or that we don't know
the full scope of yet. So, that we can,
you know, kind of rightsize that
proposal at the time.
» Any other questions?
>> The only other question I have, and I
think this is what Mr. Chrissy is trying
to get to. But if we get to the point
where we have a construction plan,
you offer a service to come back in
after construction to evaluate the
process, make sure that it was done
properly. I think what we've
>> Yeah. So we we can provide like um
during construction inspection. Okay. Um
shop drilling review if that's needed.
Construction administration. Okay.
>> Um asbuilt survey if you need that. Um
>> yeah, we can do all of that.
>> That's what I was wondering. We ran into
in the past where it's the we've got all
the way up to the construction point and
then
>> they're just hands off.
>> Hands off and
>> No, I appreciate people that can do
that.
» Any other concerns, questions?
» Thank you. It's our next move there for
sure.
>> We've already approved the task order.
I don't think there's any other on this
reconstruction. But we move on the Thank
you ladies.
>> Thank you for
>> this is the time we have set for public
comment. Anyone wishing to address the
drainage board, please state your come
to the microphone, state your name,
address, and your concerns.
Good morning board. Steven Brand, Del
County Commissioner's Office. I'm also
the president of storm water board and I
wanted to ask the drainage board if they
would be interested in having a joint
meeting between the storm water board
and the drainage board. I don't know
what that would look like statutoily. I
think legal counsel represents both
drainage and storm water board. So they
would have to weigh in on this. Also,
Mr. Borcher is associated with both
boards and I think it would be uh
valuable for both boards to uh have a
joint meeting.
>> I support that. Sounds like a great
idea.
>> Any concerns from our legal counsel?
>> No, we can do the notice. You would do a
notice for each board that you would be
at the same time in the same place. And
um the boards could
we can figure out the logistics on where
who's going to sit where, that kind of
thing. So, we can do the notices for
that. That's not a problem.
>> And I suggest we use the D doodle tool
to find the best date for many busy
people. Well, do you want to do it on a
the storm water meets the first Monday
every month?
And the drainage board meets the second
>> Wednesday of every month. So, do you
want to do it on one of those dates?
That may be the easiest. I think we've
already sent out the notices for the
storm water for the year
>> like before.
>> I would recommend tagging it onto this
meeting here.
>> Commissioner Rian and I are already
here. We would just need to bring in
Commissioner Henry and Mr. Borches is
already here.
>> Yeah,
>> sounds best for me since we're already
going to be here.
>> Yeah, that's easy to do. We could do a
You've already published all your
notices for your meetings. So, the storm
water will just make a change of its
meeting to the this time. And you want
to do it in March. You want to do it in
April or
>> March. March 11th would be our next
meeting.
>> Okay.
>> Yep. That's fine.
>> As well do it in March.
>> Be here before we know it.
>> And Mr. Whitehead, I will work with you
and legal to put together an agenda.
>> All right. Now, this is not a public
>> period. Public meeting.
>> It would be open to the public. Okay.
>> Be a public meeting for both of them.
We'll just we'll change the storm water
meeting from the second to the 11th.
>> Correct.
>> Okay.
>> Mr. Brand, if there's anything that you
want me to prepare for that meeting,
just send it to an email.
>> Absolutely. Yep. For sure.
>> Y Commissioner Brand, do you have
specific items in mind? I think that
it'd be good to talk about uh
jurisdiction and overlapping priorities.
You know, we talk about similar topics
on both boards and I just think it would
be healthy to have an open conversation
to make sure that we're using the
taxpayers's dollars as effectively as we
can.
>> Could we have the verbiage of which one
and who has those jurisdictions?
>> Sure, we'll be happy to provide that.
There is a lot of overlap. The storm
water covers a lot of the same stuff you
guys cover and there's money in the
storm water because there's separate
storm water fee on top of a drainage
assessment fee. So since we have to
abide by verbiage, it's nice to see it
in front of us. I don't like it.
>> I'd be happy to provide what the storm
water does.
>> Thank you.
>> Yeah. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
Anyone else wishing to address the
drainage board, please come forth.
>> New business, Mr. Surveyor.
>> Yeah. Uh,
believe in James.
» No, that's Do you want to talk to
Banning Engineering about the A
McConnell report? Well, no. At some
point,
>> it's up.
>> I don't step on you. I just
>> No, you're fine. We're going to open
bids. And like I said, we got a lot of
bids to open, so it's up to you guys.
» Well, as I said in the January meeting,
the drainage board had me put together a
list of debrushing projects,
and so I put together there's 14 of them
on there. Uh,
two of them are ones that we do annually
just because of the water in the area
and the
high population density in that area.
And then the other ones are just ones
that have needed to be done for years.
So, I asked I sent out uh quotes to uh
respects to
uh some contractors and they got me
quotes. So, I guess we'll open them up.
Anybody have any questions before we
start?
>> And Mr. Borchers is going to open these
in the order of priority. So the
priority that um we feel um they need to
be completed to sustain drainage in
Delaware County. Um I would suggest that
we wait until we have opened all of the
quotes before we make any decisions on
awarding any of the quotes to make sure
that we have enough funds to cover the
codes the quotes of highest priority.
>> Making sure we have funds is necessary.
Uh the the first one is on your sheet is
no name creek. This is the area that a
McConnell drains in that Banning
Engineering is working on a
reconstruction with. So I thought
there's no sense of reconstruction that
tile if the open ditch that drains that
tile is not
clear of debris and brush. So the first
quote was from Butler Masonry.
I think I got a thingy.
I do a thingy.
Butler masonry quote was for $78,190.20.
The next one is from Coupe Salon and
Landscape.
And this was for 45,413.
And the last quote that we receive from
this is from JJC Excavating.
And it's for 47,388.
The next ditch is the Hyatt. This is the
one that runs by the old school in
Tiltson. It's a summer job mowing. It's
not really de brushing.
Number 13. First one is from Butler
Masonry.
It's for $25,410.
The next quote is from Coup's Lawn and
Landscape.
It's for 20,000 even.
The next bid is from JJC Escavating
for $13,860.
The next one is uh job number 14. It's a
shramm ditch. This is the one that runs
through country village. It's also
another annual mowing job.
The first bid quote is from uh
Scram or from Butler, excuse me.
It's for $30,019.
Second quote is from Coup's Lawn
Landscape.
Yeah, that's a good one
for 17,000. Even
the third quote for number 14th, the hot
the shra is from JJC.
for 32,748.
And the last one is from Schneider
Excavating
and it's for 10,8684.
This next quote is
job number one, the Isaac Linux. And
this first one is from Butler Masonry
for a total of $68,837.
Second quote is from Coup's Lawnscape
or land in law landscape.
It's for $57,968.90.
» That was 57,000.
>> 57,968.90.
The last quote for this job is from JJC
Excavating.
» It's for $54,345.
Before we go on, Tom, on this Isaac
Linux, there was a question about some
signs that were posted um not to remove
vegetation. Was that clarified with all
three of these contractors?
>> Yes, I've talked to all three of them
about them. They they are actually
all of them contacted my office or
someone else about them and I've talked
to them all about it. So, yeah, they
understand.
>> The the background for the board was
during the original construction or
reconstruction of this ditch, it was
relocated to a new um location. And at
that time the contractor placed signs um
permanent signs on the ditch bank that
said do not mow or debrush, do not
remove any vegetation. Those signs were
never removed. So there was a question
with some of the contractors on do I
have to mow the whole thing or do I stop
at the signs? So that was clarified. I
just wanted to make sure that was done
before.
>> So they do the whole thing.
>> They do the whole thing. And for
everybody's information, this was the ditch that Walmart South Walmart
paid for, put in, and I don't think
anything's been done to it really since
on that one section.
>> Thank you, Tom.
>> Yep. Next, we're going to go to number
two, the Dora Wilhelm
versus Butler Masonry.
Uh $19,019019.
Second quote is from Coup's
lawn and landscape.
It's for $19,019019.
The third quote is from JJC Excavating.
So for $24,453.
And the fourth quote is from Schneider
Escavating. Nope. Yep. Schneider
Escavating.
It's for $8,341.19.
Next is three, the Donovan.
First one is from Butler Masonry.
That's for $30,15.
Second one is from Coops Lawn and
Landscape.
It's for $27,49857.
The third and final quote for the
Donovan number three is from JJC
Excavating
is for $19,66.50.
Next up is the thimple number four.
$6,260.
That was from Butler Masonry.
6260.
Next is Coup's Lawn and Landscape.
$15,12.60.
Next is from JJC Escavating,
$3,756.
And the fourth and final one for number
four fimple is from Schneider
excavating
general contractor on this one.
$10,16.
Got number five, Campbell Creek.
First one was from Butler Masonry.
54,915.
Next is Coup's Lawn and Landscape.
$32,522.87.
Third is from JJC Excavating.
$ 28,372.75.
We got one from Full and Camp E
excavating.
It's for $36,610.
Number six is Lwood Reese. First one is
from Butler Excavating or Butler
Masonry,
$34,665.
Second one is from Coup's Lawn and
Landscape
26,576.
Third and final one for the number six
Reese is JJC Esavating.
$35,820.50.
Number seven is for the Ham Miller. This
is the ditch that runs through uh McCall
Park
versus Butler Masonry.
99,123
Second is Coup's Lawn and Landscape
29,526.
» Tom, can we back up a second?
>> Yeah. Butler was 99,123.
» Yes.
>> And coupe is how much?
>> 29,526.
>> Thank you.
And the third and final is JJC
Excavating
$59,52
59052
McLean ditch number eight
Butler Masonry.
27,888
30 $27,888.30
JJC escavating
$25,353.
That's all for
ML.
Number nine, the ShraMM.
Tom, just to clarify, there is a
difference between number 14, the
ShraMM, and number nine, the ShraMM.
>> Yeah, correct. The number 14, the ShraMM
is what goes through Country Village
that we know every year. And then uh
number nine that we're going through
would continue from the end of country
village around through LL LJ Stone I
believe it is and up to 28 and it would
clear that next section of the ditch cuz
there's so much water that goes in there
from Country Village and the surrounding
houses. This would continue it on to 28
and then from there it goes up north and
it's that's been cleaned before but that
section
from Country Village basically to 28.
Hasn't been cleaned in a long time. Got
it. Thank you.
This would be uh Butler Masonry.
$47,11410.
Coup's lawn and landscape.
$42,831.
JJC
escavating
$40,00045150
40
45150.
This next quote is from Brian Jackson.
for 16,500.
The last quote is from Schneider
11,7714.
from second to last one. Here we go.
Morrison Ditch
number 10.
First quote is from Butler Masonry.
$41,15.70.
Next one is from JJC Excavating
$31,72.50.
50 cents.
The last bid for this quote is
Schneider
$8,23.14.
The last of the
is for the Ferguson number 11.
First one is from Butler Masonry.
$52,852.50.
Next one is from JJC Excavating
for a total of $39,72.50.
The next one is from Fold and Camp
Excavating. This ditch is a partial
debrush of it and then
the to dip the whole thing. Uh I believe
they're going to be putting in some tile
out there. So they requested the ditch
be dipped. So Fen Camp appears to have
put it for debrushing and dipping. So
they we'll have to add these up.
Someone's got a calculator
for the debrushing part of it.
He has $22,987.
And for the dipping section, he has
$11,627.
» 54614
quicker next time.
» And for the last quote, Schneider for
the Ferguson dippity brush.
$17,194.68
68 cents.
» And we are done.
If we were to pick the the lowest bid of
all of these, I think it comes out to
just over $32,000
for the total of um all of these jobs.
Um Mr. surveyor, do you have any um
technical
concerns of awarding these jobs to the
lowest responsive and responsible bidder
pending legal review?
>> I do not, like I said, I've I've seen
work that Coup's Lawn and Landscape has
done, but they've never actually worked
for the county. I believe he's one of
the lower ones.
Um, but all the other contractors
that had a low bid, they've worked for
the county and I support anything they
do. That makes sense.
The lowest bidder on six of these jobs
was JJC Excavating. Jiren Crabtree, who
owns JJC Excavating, is in the audience
today. Do any board members have
questions or concerns with awarding six
of these jobs to Jiren Crabtree?
No.
Okay.
>> Tom, do we need to award that we need to
finish this up today?
>> No, just there's a couple of them with
deadlines.
Uh there's believe there's two that you
can't get to from a road on our rideway.
So, you have to go through a field. So,
I believe I have a one of them has like
an April 15th deadline and the other
ones have May 1 deadlines. because you
can't access them without going through
a crop field.
So, uh those would probably be on the uh
more immediate side. And then there's
other ones like the annual mow jobs that
we do. We we won't do those till the end
of June into July. So, I mean, it's all
about access and what the actual mowing
or debrushing is, if that makes sense.
I I think I summarized it on a sheet
with the the deadlines on there and you
know I don't know legalize if you guys
want to talk about it and award them at
a different date. Do we have to have a
special meeting? I don't know that.
Mr. Craftree, do you believe that you
would be able to complete all of this
work as established on the ref request
for quotes? Please go to the mic so we
can get it on the minutes
and and for the board's uh
I went to the the racer ditch last week.
He's completed it. Looks nice. I talked
to the farmer. He's happy. Everything's
cleaned up. The farmer said he would
plow some of the rideway.
Just kind of mudded in a little bit, but
the farmer was so happy with the ditch
that he said he would plow that and
everything looked nice. So, that was
just for the board's information on that
racer ditch that we had some trouble
with last year.
>> Please state your name and address.
>> Yeah, it's Jiren Crabree. My address is
8800 South County Road, 300 West. Um, I
do not see an issue in finishing these
ditches for a time frame given.
>> Thank you.
>> I guess is there any other questions to
Mr. Crafter from the board?
Okay. Thank you.
Tom, you've done a great job putting all
this together and this is
pretty ambitious and um I like the looks
of it and thank you and
once again I think you've done a great
job on this.
>> Thank you. The value of this quoting
process should be apparent to all the
taxpayers in Delaware County in the
money that was saved from the highest
quote to the lowest quote on all these
jobs. With that, I would like to make a
motion to accept the lowest responsible
and responsive bidder pending legal
review for compliance on all of these
jobs.
>> I'll second.
>> Have a motion before properly second.
Roll call, please.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
Yes.
>> No,
>> Mr. B.
>> Yes.
» Pass. Any other new business? Mr.
Surveyor.
No new business. So, just so that for
the board's information,
Jennifer will compile the a list of all
these quotes and send out to all
participating
uh contractors that put in quotes with a
summaration and who was awarded the
quotes just so everybody knows. Then
they'll have that for next year and so
on. But besides that, I have no new
business. Great,
>> Mr. Miller. That was I'm sorry. Go
ahead,
>> Mr. Miller. Well, can I bring up a piece
of new business just for the Sure.
>> When we um were appointed the attorney
for the drainage board, we appreciate
that opportunity. We noted that when the
budget was adopted for the drainage
board in for 2026 that the um salary for
the attorney was placed in the 100 or
payroll part. uh for our purposes and we
really think it should be moved uh to
the 300 series which is contractual
services under the budget. And so we
would make a request to save the county
some money and not have to pay payroll
taxes and whatnot is to make a request
to council for a transfer of the funds
for the Delaware County Drains Board
attorney from the 100 series to the 300.
You can put it in a 320 or whatever the
number is for contractual service. We
think that's a better place for for this
to be in the first place.
>> Mr. Brooke, do we need a motion to make
that change?
>> Yes.
>> I'd like to make that motion.
>> Have a motion before us properly.
Second. Roll call, please.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Mr. Mr. Christy.
>> Yes.
>> Mr. Buckle.
>> Yes.
>> We'll get that taken for care of for
you.
>> What will happen is you'll need to make
a transfer request to the council for
their next meeting,
>> right? I don't think it since it's not
dealing with new money. It doesn't have
to be advertised. It just is trans.
>> We we also have some perpetuation money
we have to move around. So, we'll put
that right on there with it and go from
there.
>> Okay.
>> Thank you.
» Uh Joe Miller with Banning Engineering
uh Planefield, Indiana. appreciate the
opportunity to uh talk to you guys
today. Uh talk a little bit with uh Tom
and Joe. Um we've got kind of an
existing conditions analysis of the Abe
McConnell uh completed. Uh we've been on
site and walk the whole the whole length
of it and we've got three draft
alternatives right now. We'd like to
meet with staff, go over those, see if
they have any tweaks they'd like to make
to those and modifications. Also would
be a good opportunity to get some kind
of local pricing that you guys have. for
uh some drain tile costs. They vary
pretty significantly. Um when you go to
different counties, so it'd be nice to
have some idea when we're putting
together the uh the estimates. Um so
we've got a ballpark figure for all
those things. Um if you want me to speak
a little bit more about what it's a
challenging site uh and a challenging
issue and it looks like it's tried to
been addressed a couple times already
and um to varying degrees of success. So
um but that's kind of where we're at
right now. need to get something with
Tom uh set something up and
move forward. Hopefully have something
maybe by the next board meeting you guys
can have an a the full report kind of a
recommendation on moving forward and and
what that process looks like.
>> Any questions for Mr. B?
>> I I do have a comment. There are two
claims um on the Ed McConnell ditch by
um Joe Schneider and um those I talked
to Joe about those. Both of those
repairs were for existing clay and
concrete tile that was part of the 1973
and then the 2009 reconstruction. Those
reconstructions were not properly
designed or in installed and this has
resulted in water continuing to flow
through these existing drains and this
is one of many claims that we've had to
fix those by hiring an engineering group
such as lock Mueller or BL or Banning to
do this design work. My hope is that we
avoid further complications created by
um improper design and installation of
new reconstructions.
>> Thank you.
>> Did you say you had an approximate
number for the job?
>> Well, I I want to talk with staff, make
sure we've got it kind of lined out and
make sure we got everything encompassed.
It's a it Mr. Chris, it's a you it's a
challenging area. There's with with
three different regulated drains. I'm
not sure exactly how to address all
those necessarily uh because it's not
something we run it. Normally when you
do a reconstruction, you want to take
out the old pipe and connect in
>> Yes.
>> those. I mean, that's a requirement. And
when that doesn't get done at the time
of it, that significantly complicates
matters and you keep fixing stuff long
term that uh really shouldn't be needing
to be fixed. So, uh makes it a lot more
challenging.
But no, but yeah, we'll meet with Tom
and and Joe and uh
probably tweak what we have a little bit
and uh bring us before the board
hopefully next month. So,
>> we'll have a meeting and review
alternatives. Thank you, Joe.
>> Yeah. Thank you. Thank you.
Any other uh old old business?
>> No, sir. Oh, yes. I I said this earlier,
but
Mr. Crabtree put a claim in for the the
rest of the racer ditch. Like I said, I
went out there. Everything's fine. It
looks great. He did a good job out
there. And uh
I would uh give a favor recommendation
to to pay the claim on the racer ditch.
Any comments
>> from our last meeting? I crashed on my
agenda some little note about a vacated
ditch uh 700 West Dennis Nixon and David
How. Mr. Borchers looked into this. Um
it was not indicated on the current map
as a regulated drain, but we did find
Mr. Borchers did find history of that
being a legal and regulated drain with a
history of repairs. Um Mr. Orchard has
looked into replacing approximately
1,600
1600 feet of that tile that is currently
broken down and in poor condition. Um it
would not change the size or depth of
the regulated drain. So it would be a
repair instead of reconstruction. Tom,
do you have any other comments on that?
No, I was I I went to receive quotes to
replace that and I couldn't I wanted to
get a estimate of the pipe along with as
you guys know I buy the pipe and and let
the contractors install it because I've
dug up too much single wall stuff that
is basically junk.
So when we were talking about it then we
had the snow hit and there's no way I
could get out there to see what what
type what size of pipe's even there. I
know what the map says from 1953, but I
don't know what's actually out there
now. So, now that the snow is melted, I
can get out there, find what size that
pipe is, get a quote for the pipe, and
then receive quotes from three or four
contractors to install that pipe, and
that'll take that from uh basically from
the or from the bypass back down to
where we've worked on it before, and we
know it works. So, I I would suggest by
the next meeting that I'll have those
quotes already and we can open those up
and replace that pipe.
I I had two other items um before we go
on. Um one, Purdue University is
offering three hours of on-site drainage
training. Um the deadline is March 15th
for sign up. Um I would encourage anyone
from the surveyor's office that is
interested in that training to sign up
by March 15th. And um the other one is
um Indiana Department of Transportation
is modifying three intersections in
Delaware County. Um one of those is at
300 South and State Road 35. And there's
been a history of the Lwood re Lwood Ree
regulated drain um having problems
draining into the outlet of White River
in that area. And Mr. Borchers is
keeping an eye on that project um to
decide if there are any impacted
drainage concerns.
Sorry.
» Any other old business?
>> I do not have any. If this is the time
set aside for any comments from the
board.
» Thank you.
» Next, approval of maintenance claims.
Any questions, concerns? I I have one
change that I would like to request and
that is on um the DEG work order um
7412. There are actually two different
invoices under 7412 and they listed No
Name Creek as the um wershed and I would
like to have that changed to aid
McConnell um just to keep track of where
the work was performed.
I don't have any other questions or
concerns.
If not would entertain a motion.
>> So moved.
>> Second.
>> Have a motion before us. Properly
second. Roll call, please.
>> Mr. Whitehead.
>> Yes.
>> Mr. Hamilton.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Mr.
>> Yes.
>> Seeing no other business,
a motion to adjurnn, please. So move.
All
>> in favor say I. I.
>> Thank you.