[0:02] Um,
[0:05] this regular meeting of the planning
commission is
[0:10] started on April 15th.
We'll do a re a roll call and then jump
[0:19] into our agenda. Dave, can you start
down there?
[0:23] » David Merrick, district three. Todd
Queen, District 1. Lance at home,
[0:28] district two. Lane Bronus, District 2.
>> Kate Darlington, District Three.
[0:33] » Sean Gardner, planning director.
>> Kelson Hatter, planning tech
[0:38] code.
[0:41] » All right. Um,
anyone have any additions to the agenda
[0:46] they want to make before we get going?
>> We're going to start with public hearing
[0:52] PLN25-060.
[0:55] PIT reszone.
Uh, I'll have staff do a presentation.
[1:01] We can ask questions of the applicant
and then make our decision. Looks like
[1:05] there's no public here at this point.
Um, should be a fairly straightforward
[1:11] uh application. And then after that is
decided on, we will jump back into the
[1:19] work session for the
uh best systems.
[1:26] Hopefully we don't have too many more of
us. Hopefully we're getting
[1:29] » This will be our last one. I
>> um
[1:35] take it away.
>> Thank you.
[1:40] » As you already prefaced, this is for PLN
25.060
[1:44] pit reszone. Um quick overview. The
application was for originally for
[1:50] boundary line adjustment. Uh when we
reviewed the application, we discovered
[1:54] that the boundary line adjustment when
completed would create multiple zones
[1:59] from what was present and create
actually what's called split zoning. Uh
[2:04] due to that fact, we uh did have to do a
reszone. We did the application for
[2:09] reszone is for two properties that end
up being reszone.
[2:14] um from res one to A5 was from A20 to
A5.
[2:20] Um
[2:28] but as you can see it's uh it's three
parcels in total and basically the
[2:34] situation is is the family's working on
adjusting everything to get everything
[2:37] to match up with their property lines
and their infrastructure.
[2:41] Um, and if we go to the we'll do a quick
oversight.
[2:47] Um, on the map, as you can see, pretty
large area. The, uh, this is the area to
[2:53] be effective. And on the next slide,
here's an example of the zoning that I
[2:58] was talking about. We have res one down
by the highway. We have A20 and also the
[3:04] upper parcel is an A5. Um, and the
reason this comes into play is if we hit
[3:10] the next slide, this is the proposed
boundary line adjustment areas. And as
[3:15] you can see, we end up with a section
that's A20 and A5 and res one and A20.
[3:23] Um,
based on the configuration of the
[3:28] boundary line adjustment and the
surrounding properties,
[3:32] um, it seems to be the most appropriate.
If we go back up, let me go back up one.
[3:37] When you look at the zoning,
clearly we have A5 bordering the entire
[3:41] property. Um, so one of the
contingencies is that we don't the
[3:46] zoning doesn't really have a mass effect
or will effect on surrounding properties
[3:50] and other areas and this would be more
conforming to what's already there for
[3:55] zoning. The area that's in the res one
was part of a UG and that got just wiped
[4:02] out and everything was made res one. And
for those of you familiar with that area
[4:07] right off the highway to be res one
there is no it could not support the
[4:11] infrastructure for 1acre lots. There's
just not enough infrastructure. So again
[4:15] that makes sense that if it was A5 it
would be more conforming to the area.
[4:20] Um,
>> plus I don't think the town of Peyona
[4:23] has any intention of going north and
then on the other side of the highway
[4:27] either
>> with infrastructure.
[4:29] » So by looking at the overview and
looking at what was proposed, the
[4:33] logical solution is to move this forward
to a reszone. Um, so the process for
[4:38] that reszone, we've gone through the
application. Um, the uh public notice
[4:43] was provided also as per required. We
did a neighborhood meeting. The
[4:47] neighborhood meeting has been uh
reviewed and everything was done with
[4:52] the director for the summary. I have no
uh comments from any of the neighbors of
[4:57] opposition or or uh support. It's got no
communications from any of the
[5:03] surrounding properties.
And again, the the main the main part of
[5:08] this that work just makes sense um
before the boundary line can be done,
[5:12] the reasoning would end up making
everything in A5 and it would flow more
[5:17] and be more applicable to surrounding
properties.
[5:24] And basically with all of that put
together and I'll take questions or any
[5:29] comments that you might have, but as we
mentioned, this is pretty
[5:31] straightforward. Um, we would recommend
that the planning commission make a
[5:35] recommendation to board of county
commissioners to approve PLN25-060
[5:41] pit reszone. Two parcels
um, currently zone 1820. The other one
[5:47] is res one be switched to an
agricultural 5 acre zoning district.
[5:53] This would then of course have to amend
the 2024 land use zoning maps indicating
[5:58] the reszone from A20
uh to A5 and from res one to A5.
[6:05] Upon review, there are no um negative
impacts on infrastructure surrounding
[6:09] properties or anything else and
everything meets the criteria of the
[6:13] land use code for this project. The
applicants are here um and if you have
[6:18] questions, I'll be happy to take them.
Anyone
[6:30] have questions on this?
[6:34] » What is the current water supply for for
the property as it is?
[6:38] » Um, the only water supplies present are
already for the residences that are
[6:42] there. Um, I believe
>> well,
[6:45] » they're wells.
>> Yes, three wells. So,
[6:49] » and there's
not
[7:00] anyone else.
[7:09] I'm just trying to look I was I was
giving a quick look at table uh 2B if
[7:15] there's any kind of like really
significant differences between A20 and
[7:20] A5 and res one, you know, for people who
own property around there if they're
[7:25] expecting something can or can't happen
next to them currently.
[7:30] Um,
[7:36] and there's residences on each of these
parcels.
[7:41] » There is currently
[7:51] » reszone
[7:54] land use code requires
group adequate water supply. Does staff
[7:59] feel like
It met that requirement.
[8:03] » Yes, it did. I think I have it in here
for which the wells are actually in my
[8:09] file,
>> but yeah, we're we're we're satisfied
[8:13] with the water supply.
[8:17] » Each property has its own look.
>> Yes.
[8:19] » Yes.
>> I have a survey or map.
[8:22] » Yeah, we have a big one. We just
couldn't shrink it down enough
[8:25] » because it indicated the wells, but it's
it it's very detailed and we couldn't
[8:31] get it to make it where you would be
able to read it.
[8:48] » You have three residents there already
in three different wells. Yeah,
[8:53] there's two res on one parcel, one one
middle part.
[9:01] Oh, I see.
[9:11] Can I explain
[9:17] this
about this? Um so this is all family
[9:22] property
when each one of us has our own um home
[9:29] electricity and all those tiny things.
So this would be the fire mount canal
[9:34] be one property
another and then this would be another
[9:40] and then well
here one here and one here
[9:48] property already has uh OTS
less on
[9:53] » everything's been established for
>> oh over 30 years
[9:58] » go my grandparents and my mom and dad's
property and clubbed it in all four of
[10:02] our names and we're trying to divide it
so our children don't have to.
[10:08] » That's right.
>> So yeah, already established driveways.
[10:12] This one comes in from Stevens Gulch as
well as Prior Mountain
[10:16] Road. This is
>> kind
[10:26] of
[10:32] » no structure
or anything. They're all
[10:39] changes
[10:45] all flow work with this alteration bound
and adjustment to get everything on the
[10:50] right property
that up a little
[10:54] » as the land use code requires that we
can't have multiple zone. Correct. And
[10:59] we can have a lot that in
>> correct really what we're trying to
[11:03] » all we're talking about right now is the
uh because the boundary adjustment
[11:06] obviously wouldn't come before you. Uh
this is strictly about the reszone
[11:12] meeting all the rest of the areas around
it and that's practical doesn't cause
[11:15] any incumbrances on infrastructure
neighboring properties devaluation or
[11:21] any kind of thing like that. And
obviously when we look at it, it really
[11:24] makes sense. And also by the response of
no one to support or oppose this reszone
[11:31] with the neighborhood meetings and the
public notices.
[11:34] » Great.
>> I move that we recommend to the board of
[11:38] county commissioners to approve
PLN25-060
[11:43] reszoning the two parcels.
Um, currently zon
[11:49] to uh and a res one to a5 zoning.
>> Have a second.
[12:00] » Commissioner Queen seconds.
Uh, all in favor?
[12:04] » I.
>> Uh, none opposed. The motion passes to
[12:08] recommend that PLN25-060
[12:13] uh is approved by the board of county
commissioners. You'll go before the
[12:17] board of county commissioners to get uh
hopefully a final approval from them. Um
[12:24] you'll be notified when that meeting is.
And
[12:28] with that, we can end the public
hearing.