1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:11,700 Here, just as good. Looks like we're good. Okay. Sorry. It keeps popping up. Gemini wants to tell me all sorts of things we can do with this call. Welcome to. 2 00:00:14,020 --> 00:00:31,580 Okay. We've got this handled to the semi-annual meeting of the JAS advisory council. Thanks for joining us. We have a pre-packed agenda. So we'll get started. We've got name tags and people can see online. So I think we could perhaps dispense with introduction. 3 00:00:31,580 --> 00:00:36,620 options. How do you guys feel about that since perfect? I got thumbs up in the room. We're 4 00:00:36,620 --> 00:00:43,220 going to go with it. So, because we're an open and public meeting, I am going to open 5 00:00:43,780 --> 00:00:48,940 the floor for any public comments. Does anyone in the room have a public comment they'd like 6 00:00:48,940 --> 00:00:49,340 to make? 7 00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:58,840 I see fingers pointing over here. I'll call on you. Is anyone online have a public 8 00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:00,720 comment they would like to make 9 00:01:07,150 --> 00:01:10,530 anyone okay we had had someone who said they 10 00:01:10,530 --> 00:01:17,590 wanted to make a public comment online but I don't know I'm sorry I'm trying 11 00:01:17,590 --> 00:01:23,030 to let everybody in but it doesn't say who needs to be let in all right we won't 12 00:01:23,030 --> 00:01:29,330 worry about it okay so I'll close public comments and we'll move right along so the 13 00:01:29,330 --> 00:01:33,930 first order of business is to adopt the bylaws that were presented and those were 14 00:01:33,930 --> 00:01:37,750 They were put on the meeting invite, they were posted on a public meeting site, and I 15 00:01:37,750 --> 00:01:42,310 appreciate Stan made a few technical edits that I was like super impressed that you caught 16 00:01:42,310 --> 00:01:42,570 those. 17 00:01:42,910 --> 00:01:44,410 You did better than the attorney. 18 00:01:45,650 --> 00:01:49,410 So there were four small technical edits that were made. 19 00:01:49,810 --> 00:01:51,530 We can go through them if you want. 20 00:01:51,690 --> 00:01:58,830 They were like consistency with naming the body, and I think clarifying what a quorum was 21 00:01:58,830 --> 00:01:59,370 correct. 22 00:02:01,250 --> 00:02:07,110 So any discussion on the bylaws? Any thoughts? I'll entertain a motion. 23 00:02:09,270 --> 00:02:10,870 I'll motion to accept the bylaws. 24 00:02:11,410 --> 00:02:16,370 Stan has made the motion. Is there a second? Phoebe has made the second. 25 00:02:16,530 --> 00:02:19,950 I have to say this out loud because when I went back to do the minutes, I didn't last time. 26 00:02:19,950 --> 00:02:25,610 I was like, I don't know who said that. So motion made by Stan, seconded by Phoebe. 27 00:02:25,610 --> 00:02:45,410 All right. All in favor any opposed. Perfect. All right. The next is approving the November 2025 meeting minutes. I didn't hear any comments on those any discussion to that. 28 00:02:46,210 --> 00:02:55,280 So formal. All entertain a motion to approve the November 2025 meeting minutes. All right. Thank 29 00:02:55,280 --> 00:03:02,640 you, Kendall. Look for a second. Buck with a second. Any discussion to the motion? All right. 30 00:03:02,940 --> 00:03:10,820 All those in favor of approving the November 2025 meeting minutes? Say aye. Any opposed? Perfect. Thank 31 00:03:10,820 --> 00:03:13,380 Thank you. All right. This is the next exciting part. 32 00:03:13,660 --> 00:03:18,000 Eric is going to talk. Oh, I guess I should go or this is the agenda. 33 00:03:18,260 --> 00:03:19,980 I think hopefully you can all remote. 34 00:03:20,220 --> 00:03:24,420 We're going to talk about tax exemption types for a project that we've been working on. 35 00:03:24,920 --> 00:03:26,620 We're going to briefly touch on maybe. 36 00:03:27,180 --> 00:03:29,580 Many data standards or table that the next meeting. 37 00:03:30,100 --> 00:03:33,700 And then we'll go through all the subcommittee reports and that will take a bulk of our time 38 00:03:33,700 --> 00:03:36,800 and then we'll have time for an open discussion at the end. 39 00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:40,200 So, Mr. Nieman, I welcome you. 40 00:03:40,580 --> 00:03:43,000 I'll be standing under the HDMI key. 41 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:46,240 Good morning. 42 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:48,480 So in one of our subcommittees. 43 00:03:48,740 --> 00:03:50,940 Yeah, the really projector you're gonna have to use it. 44 00:03:51,020 --> 00:03:57,420 In one of our subcommittees for the County and city data standards, we've talked about tax 45 00:03:57,420 --> 00:04:04,140 exemption types and trying to work towards standardization in the assessor databases to help 46 00:04:04,140 --> 00:04:11,680 facilitate a check that was laid out in statute where we are supposed to be putting forward 47 00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:18,180 a publicly owned parcel database for the state. So that's something that we've been working 48 00:04:18,180 --> 00:04:23,260 on. We're working with the Utah Association of Counties to build out that data set. But 49 00:04:23,260 --> 00:04:29,880 in some cases the assessor databases or the counties may not be tracking publicly owned 50 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:35,440 parcels, tax exempt parcels very closely, because they're not generating revenue for the 51 00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:40,120 county. So sometimes they just kind of get put to the side. There may not be any attributes. 52 00:04:41,020 --> 00:04:45,860 Assigned to them, in some cases, they're not mapped out and maintained in a GIS dataset. 53 00:04:47,060 --> 00:04:52,940 But as part of that, that body we've been working toward this proposal, and I think we 54 00:04:52,940 --> 00:04:58,700 are kind of on the cusp of it at the last advisory council meeting in November. 55 00:04:58,700 --> 00:05:12,680 So what we came up with was trying to categorize into government and nonprofit buckets where the assessor data would be ideally standardized and include these tax exemptions.