1 00:00:08,346 --> 00:00:12,417 Chairperson mendelson: I'm calling to order this meeting, 2 00:00:12,417 --> 00:00:15,620 regular meeting of the council of the district of columbia, our 3 00:00:15,620 --> 00:00:21,200 33rd meeting of council period 2 6, and our regular council 4 00:00:21,427 --> 00:00:24,763 meeting for the month of july. I like pointing that out because 5 00:00:24,763 --> 00:00:29,563 today is june 30. The time is 12:29 in the 6 00:00:31,269 --> 00:00:36,374 afternoon -- excuse me, 1:29 in the afternoon and we are in room 7 00:00:36,374 --> 00:00:39,912 500 of the council buildings. I'm chair mendelson, chair of 8 00:00:39,912 --> 00:00:43,448 the council. We always begin our legislative 9 00:00:43,448 --> 00:00:47,753 meetings with a moment of silence and a moment for 10 00:00:47,753 --> 00:00:49,354 reflection, if we could have silence in the chamber and on 11 00:00:49,354 --> 00:00:53,554 the dais. Madam secretary would you please 12 00:01:21,753 --> 00:01:25,353 call the roll? Councilmember allen: here. 13 00:01:29,861 --> 00:01:32,861 juanita mary tillman white present. 14 00:01:34,566 --> 00:01:38,166 ddot here. A. Litteri inc. Present. 15 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:41,390 diane k. Triplett alexander here. 16 00:01:41,390 --> 00:01:43,642 dmoi here. Personal delivery device weight 17 00:01:43,642 --> 00:01:47,842 limit present. P.a.v.e. Presence. 18 00:01:52,918 --> 00:01:56,255 >> you have a quorum. Chairperson mendelson: we have 19 00:01:56,255 --> 00:02:00,792 the secretary's report of filings and I will recognize the 20 00:02:00,792 --> 00:02:05,592 chair. >> I move a motion to waive the 21 00:02:06,531 --> 00:02:07,432 reading of the committee reports. 22 00:02:07,432 --> 00:02:11,937 chairperson mendelson: motion to raise the reports of committee 23 00:02:11,937 --> 00:02:16,208 filings. All those in favor of the motion 24 00:02:16,208 --> 00:02:18,608 say aye. Any opposed? 25 00:02:19,711 --> 00:02:23,911 hearing on the ayes have it unanimously. 26 00:02:24,616 --> 00:02:26,585 we also have the introduction and referrals. 27 00:02:26,585 --> 00:02:28,420 I will recognize the chair pro tem anita bonds. 28 00:02:28,420 --> 00:02:34,420 councilmember bonds: I move a motion to waive the introduction 29 00:02:35,494 --> 00:02:36,762 and referrals of proposed legislation report. 30 00:02:36,762 --> 00:02:40,832 chairperson mendelson: motion to waive the reading of the 31 00:02:40,832 --> 00:02:45,369 secretary's report discussion. On the motion to waive all those 32 00:02:45,369 --> 00:02:48,969 in favor say aye. Any opposed? 33 00:02:49,408 --> 00:02:56,800 the ayes have it unanimously. We have the consent agenda, one 34 00:02:56,148 --> 00:02:58,517 change to the committee of the whole on page three at the very 35 00:02:58,517 --> 00:03:05,117 top of the page item c, first reading bill 26-422, glazier 36 00:03:06,491 --> 00:03:09,461 licensing standards and certification act of 2026 remove 37 00:03:09,461 --> 00:03:12,531 from the consent agenda. Any other changes to the consent 38 00:03:12,531 --> 00:03:16,731 agenda? Hearing on we have the consent 39 00:03:20,605 --> 00:03:23,426 agenda as amended before us. All those in favor say aye. 40 00:03:23,426 --> 00:03:28,226 any opposed? Hearing on the ayes have it 41 00:03:28,331 --> 00:03:32,531 unanimously. We will turn to bill 26-422. 42 00:03:34,337 --> 00:03:36,500 glazier licensing standards and certification act of 2026. 43 00:03:36,500 --> 00:03:39,605 councilmember nadeau. Councilmember nadeau: so moved, 44 00:03:39,842 --> 00:03:41,544 mr. Chairman. Chairperson mendelson: any 45 00:03:41,544 --> 00:03:44,544 discussion? Councilmember henderson: I ask 46 00:03:44,980 --> 00:03:47,316 this be moved from consent because I wanted the ability to 47 00:03:47,316 --> 00:03:51,721 speak to it. I had questions during the 48 00:03:51,721 --> 00:03:54,924 committee of the whole. I'm not opposed to licensure in 49 00:03:54,924 --> 00:03:59,261 general I just moved several nominations for the board of 50 00:03:59,261 --> 00:04:02,861 pharmacy where those individuals are licensed. 51 00:04:02,965 --> 00:04:08,404 I wanted to raise concerns on the record in that glaziers is 52 00:04:08,404 --> 00:04:10,539 not a profession or field commonly licensed in the same 53 00:04:10,539 --> 00:04:14,139 way that electricians, plumbers, etc. Are. 54 00:04:18,348 --> 00:04:21,617 it would require perhaps an examination, certain number of 55 00:04:21,617 --> 00:04:24,387 hours in terms of apprenticeship, etc. 56 00:04:24,387 --> 00:04:28,424 but I wanted to highlight a concern we should be aware of, 57 00:04:28,424 --> 00:04:33,429 even in the committee reported outlines there are about 240 58 00:04:33,429 --> 00:04:38,829 glaziers in our region and only 60 are currently certified. 59 00:04:39,635 --> 00:04:43,373 in this very interesting economic space the district 60 00:04:43,373 --> 00:04:47,311 finds itself in, I think we should be concerned when we are 61 00:04:47,311 --> 00:04:51,315 making decisions that put us as an outlier especially from our 62 00:04:51,315 --> 00:04:55,515 regional partners, especially in the development space. 63 00:04:57,687 --> 00:04:59,355 what I would want us to avoid is a situation were now we have 64 00:04:59,355 --> 00:05:02,324 developers who moved to build in the district and we say great, 65 00:05:02,324 --> 00:05:05,127 here's the list of 20 people who are licensed, these are the only 66 00:05:05,127 --> 00:05:08,997 ones that can do your glazing work, which is not a requirement 67 00:05:08,997 --> 00:05:11,367 maryland and virginia would also have. 68 00:05:11,367 --> 00:05:14,403 it does seem as though this will move forward so I want to 69 00:05:14,403 --> 00:05:17,539 express that my hope is, that when the board of trade goes 70 00:05:17,539 --> 00:05:23,546 through this process, once it is funded and moves forward is that 71 00:05:23,546 --> 00:05:26,949 there is a grandfathering provision and process that 72 00:05:26,949 --> 00:05:30,190 doesn't lock people out of this profession who have been doing 73 00:05:30,190 --> 00:05:34,230 it for decades without licensure to be able to go forward but 74 00:05:34,230 --> 00:05:38,823 also considering too other mechanisms which do not 75 00:05:39,328 --> 00:05:42,365 unnecessarily lock people out of the trade like what is the 76 00:05:42,365 --> 00:05:45,334 amount, the feed to be licensed in the district? 77 00:05:45,334 --> 00:05:49,380 is it an annual certification versus something you have to be 78 00:05:49,380 --> 00:05:53,238 certified every two to three years, etc. 79 00:05:57,480 --> 00:05:59,849 there are often good reasons to be pioneers but I feel in some 80 00:05:59,849 --> 00:06:02,718 cases with occupational licensing, we can sometimes 81 00:06:02,718 --> 00:06:05,522 overdo it in terms of requiring licensure and hoops for folks to 82 00:06:05,522 --> 00:06:10,126 jump through, that are necessarily make it much more 83 00:06:10,126 --> 00:06:13,395 difficult for someone to enter the trade or profession over 84 00:06:13,395 --> 00:06:15,864 long term. I wanted to state that on the 85 00:06:15,864 --> 00:06:18,501 record. Thank you, mr. Chairman. 86 00:06:18,501 --> 00:06:20,901 chairperson mendelson: thank you. 87 00:06:21,538 --> 00:06:24,473 is there further discussion on the bill? 88 00:06:24,473 --> 00:06:28,673 councilmember lewis george: councilmember frumin's hand was 89 00:06:31,580 --> 00:06:35,684 up as well. I introduce the laser licensing 90 00:06:35,684 --> 00:06:38,955 standards and certification act because glaziers do highly 91 00:06:38,955 --> 00:06:43,359 skilled glass and metal work better next the safety, energy 92 00:06:43,359 --> 00:06:44,760 efficiency and long-term performance of buildings across 93 00:06:44,760 --> 00:06:48,300 the district. This is work that is especially 94 00:06:48,300 --> 00:06:51,934 important as the district strengthens climate resiliency 95 00:06:51,934 --> 00:06:55,938 as we experience more and more 100 degree days in the future. 96 00:06:55,938 --> 00:06:57,774 glaziers maintain the glass and metal systems that shape our 97 00:06:57,774 --> 00:07:01,374 buildings. There works affect how it 98 00:07:05,470 --> 00:07:08,551 withstands the weather and how safe it is for the public. 99 00:07:08,551 --> 00:07:10,453 when performed correctly by skilled workers it helps the 100 00:07:10,453 --> 00:07:14,757 district meet climate readiness goals and efficiency goals. 101 00:07:14,757 --> 00:07:19,461 when it is not, dangerous incidents can occur such as the 102 00:07:19,461 --> 00:07:22,131 accident at the nuclear commission building in rockville 103 00:07:22,131 --> 00:07:26,836 where a three by 15 foot acrylic panel fell from the 21st floor. 104 00:07:26,836 --> 00:07:28,938 had anyone been on the ground at that time they would've been 105 00:07:28,938 --> 00:07:33,138 gravely injured or killed. Unlike electricians, plumbers 106 00:07:33,742 --> 00:07:36,211 and hvac technicians, glaziers in the district are not 107 00:07:36,211 --> 00:07:38,547 currently required to be licensed. 108 00:07:38,547 --> 00:07:42,840 this bill creates a licensee framework for glazing 109 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:45,287 contractors bringing this more in line with other construction 110 00:07:45,287 --> 00:07:48,791 professions were the district already requires standards, 111 00:07:48,791 --> 00:07:51,930 oversight and accountability. Not all glass installation work 112 00:07:51,930 --> 00:07:54,363 will require glazier work. Contractors seek out glaziers 113 00:07:54,363 --> 00:07:58,901 for high-rise work and other highly technical or complex 114 00:07:58,901 --> 00:08:04,901 installations because they know it is highly trained area this 115 00:08:05,941 --> 00:08:08,445 will help them identify tradespeople with the skills and 116 00:08:08,445 --> 00:08:09,679 expertise needed to perform this work. 117 00:08:09,679 --> 00:08:15,117 I want to thank councilmember nadeau for the worker committee 118 00:08:15,117 --> 00:08:18,454 made to improving the bill to make sure there are more I will 119 00:08:18,454 --> 00:08:23,854 -- ways to licensure. Allowing the board of industrial 120 00:08:24,193 --> 00:08:27,396 trades to consider and examine apprenticeship, comparable 121 00:08:27,396 --> 00:08:31,670 experience or combination of education experience keeps this 122 00:08:31,670 --> 00:08:34,300 bill intact while making it more flexible and workable. 123 00:08:34,300 --> 00:08:36,439 I strongly support this bill and urge my colleagues to vote yes. 124 00:08:36,439 --> 00:08:39,439 thank you. Chairperson mendelson: thank 125 00:08:40,276 --> 00:08:43,276 you. Councilmember frumin: thank you, 126 00:08:44,481 --> 00:08:48,810 councilmembers. I fully support this bill. 127 00:08:52,755 --> 00:08:54,390 I'm curious about the mechanics of how the timing will work. 128 00:08:54,390 --> 00:08:57,990 councilmember henderson's concerns resonate with me. 129 00:09:00,129 --> 00:09:06,103 is it funded in the fy27 budget? Has it been refunded or will it 130 00:09:06,103 --> 00:09:12,107 have to be funded in the fy28 budget, meaning there is a long 131 00:09:12,107 --> 00:09:15,107 runway? Councilmember nadeau: it hasn't 132 00:09:16,379 --> 00:09:19,379 been funded. Councilmember frumin: and 133 00:09:19,515 --> 00:09:25,515 councilmember lewis george, the license might be based on prior 134 00:09:26,455 --> 00:09:31,476 experience or apprenticeship? There could be a vehicle, the 135 00:09:31,476 --> 00:09:35,414 180 people who do not have a certification, but who have been 136 00:09:35,414 --> 00:09:39,217 doing the work, one would hate to see them unnecessarily 137 00:09:39,217 --> 00:09:43,955 blocked out. But there are mechanisms to deal 138 00:09:43,955 --> 00:09:45,224 with that issue. Can you speak to what those 139 00:09:45,224 --> 00:09:47,258 mechanisms are? Councilmember nadeau: the print 140 00:09:47,258 --> 00:09:52,658 aloud's the board of industrial trades to grandfather existing 141 00:09:52,964 --> 00:09:55,299 practitioners by taking their professional experience into 142 00:09:55,299 --> 00:09:56,367 account when considering licensing requirements. 143 00:09:56,367 --> 00:09:59,367 councilmember frumin: wonderful, thank you. 144 00:10:02,730 --> 00:10:05,673 chairperson mendelson: are there further discussions? 145 00:10:05,777 --> 00:10:09,377 councilmember henderson: I have additional questions. 146 00:10:09,848 --> 00:10:11,917 I don't know if this is a question for councilmember 147 00:10:11,917 --> 00:10:17,317 nadeau, but with regard to subject to appropriations, what 148 00:10:19,858 --> 00:10:23,161 I've seen happen in the health field on we are adding a new 149 00:10:23,161 --> 00:10:27,598 profession and we give the board a responsibility to develop the 150 00:10:27,598 --> 00:10:31,269 scope of work then we tell them, hey, you also need to add a new 151 00:10:31,269 --> 00:10:35,606 person to the board, often times boards will say, we are going to 152 00:10:35,606 --> 00:10:41,278 wait until the mayor's team sends us a nomination for these 153 00:10:41,278 --> 00:10:44,615 new people before we even consider the process for this 154 00:10:44,615 --> 00:10:46,818 new profession because we want them to be part of the 155 00:10:46,818 --> 00:10:50,418 conversation. I'm curious whether or not 156 00:10:52,390 --> 00:10:56,327 perhaps on second reading you could do a bifurcated subject of 157 00:10:56,327 --> 00:10:57,962 appropriation such that the new members to the board of trade 158 00:10:57,962 --> 00:11:04,562 can be added -- I could definitely see this, we asked 159 00:11:05,169 --> 00:11:08,240 this today and the new regulations do not get out for 160 00:11:08,240 --> 00:11:11,775 three to four years if we don't put the members of the board on 161 00:11:11,775 --> 00:11:16,514 earlier than the other piece. Does that make sense? 162 00:11:16,514 --> 00:11:22,386 councilmember nadeau: yes, although it is a now not a then 163 00:11:22,386 --> 00:11:24,388 problem in the sense the author of the bill will be there. 164 00:11:24,388 --> 00:11:27,860 councilmember henderson: great. Councilmember nadeau: we could 165 00:11:27,860 --> 00:11:32,163 do that at the second reading. I don't know that we need to. 166 00:11:32,163 --> 00:11:34,932 I definitely get the concern because we have all lived it for 167 00:11:34,932 --> 00:11:41,720 the past 12 years but that time is coming to an end. 168 00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:43,472 chairperson mendelson: councilmember bonds. 169 00:11:43,474 --> 00:11:47,674 councilmember bonds: think you very much chairman. 170 00:11:48,546 --> 00:11:53,946 I want to thank councilwoman nadeau for this bill. 171 00:11:54,318 --> 00:12:00,918 in particular, I'm almost always speaking out as it relates to 172 00:12:01,859 --> 00:12:07,832 opportunities for d.c. Workers and again, that is what I'm 173 00:12:07,832 --> 00:12:13,104 about to say. But I think this issue is about 174 00:12:13,104 --> 00:12:17,942 safety and I think we have to be really concerned about that. 175 00:12:17,942 --> 00:12:22,514 we have a number of large projects that we are going to 176 00:12:22,514 --> 00:12:28,619 wrestle with and I want to make sure that whatever products we 177 00:12:28,619 --> 00:12:31,756 produce, that they are safely done. 178 00:12:31,756 --> 00:12:36,661 when we think about metal and glass, and we have what we call 179 00:12:36,661 --> 00:12:40,164 these glass and chrome structures already in the city, 180 00:12:40,164 --> 00:12:45,360 and we want to make sure as we move forward that the 181 00:12:45,360 --> 00:12:48,873 individuals not only are trained but also can go through a 182 00:12:48,873 --> 00:12:53,780 certification process, I'm very happy to support this bill 183 00:12:53,780 --> 00:12:56,780 today. Chairperson mendelson: if there 184 00:12:58,383 --> 00:13:02,153 was no further discussion the vote will be on bill 26-422. 185 00:13:02,153 --> 00:13:06,240 all those in favor of the bill say aye. 186 00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:08,240 any opposed? >> [indiscernible] 187 00:13:12,463 --> 00:13:16,663 chairperson mendelson: the aye have it unanimously. 188 00:13:18,603 --> 00:13:21,906 councilmember white will be recorded as presence. 189 00:13:21,906 --> 00:13:27,110 the bill is approved. I will turn to the nonconsent 190 00:13:27,110 --> 00:13:30,110 agenda. My understanding is the 191 00:13:32,917 --> 00:13:37,117 amendment hasn't circulated yet on bill 26-224. 192 00:13:38,322 --> 00:13:40,391 if there was no objection I will call that a little later in this 193 00:13:40,391 --> 00:13:44,194 meeting. We will deal first with bill 194 00:13:44,194 --> 00:13:47,794 26-494, accountancy practice amendment act of 2025. 195 00:13:49,400 --> 00:13:53,000 councilmember nadeau. Councilmember nadeau: yes, ok. 196 00:13:56,941 --> 00:13:59,544 earlier today at the committee of the whole I discuss the 197 00:13:59,544 --> 00:14:03,280 benefits of the accountancy practice act which passed out of 198 00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:06,150 committee with no substantive changes for what the mayor 199 00:14:06,150 --> 00:14:10,121 introduced. Now I would like to move an 200 00:14:10,121 --> 00:14:14,359 amendment and the nature of a substitute which still leaves 201 00:14:14,359 --> 00:14:18,228 those accounting licensure pieces intact but adds two new 202 00:14:18,228 --> 00:14:20,398 components germane to the underlying bill in that they 203 00:14:20,398 --> 00:14:24,736 deal with business licensing matters the department of 204 00:14:24,736 --> 00:14:26,537 licensing and public protection regulates. 205 00:14:26,537 --> 00:14:29,106 my staff circulated this amendment on friday the 26th at 206 00:14:29,106 --> 00:14:35,780 4:42 p.m. And we recirculated it yesterday with a minor change to 207 00:14:35,780 --> 00:14:37,248 the notice but not the amendment itself. 208 00:14:37,248 --> 00:14:41,448 first the ans would incorporate technically pro-business 209 00:14:43,855 --> 00:14:46,257 administrative updates to provisions recently amended. 210 00:14:46,257 --> 00:14:51,570 one of business and entrepreneur ship was funded. 211 00:14:52,530 --> 00:14:55,299 the department of licensing and consumer protection recommended 212 00:14:55,299 --> 00:14:58,136 these changes in the form of emergency and temporary 213 00:14:58,136 --> 00:15:02,507 legislation which we already passed unanimously last year. 214 00:15:02,507 --> 00:15:05,143 maybe the most noteworthy provision in the current 215 00:15:05,143 --> 00:15:09,943 temporarily -- temporary bill was amendments to propose 216 00:15:10,147 --> 00:15:13,350 entertainment establishments paired under the final version 217 00:15:13,350 --> 00:15:17,355 neighbors could file an objection and a formal hearing 218 00:15:17,355 --> 00:15:19,223 followed by decision from the mayor appeared the problem is 219 00:15:19,223 --> 00:15:23,162 dlcp is not an agency that conducts hearings so we have 220 00:15:23,162 --> 00:15:26,497 never allowed this version of the act to take effect and said 221 00:15:26,497 --> 00:15:31,503 the mayor proposed letting anc's evaluate objections and submit 222 00:15:31,503 --> 00:15:34,503 them which would be [indiscernible] 223 00:15:35,373 --> 00:15:40,311 ultimately the buck stops with the mayor either way but this 224 00:15:40,311 --> 00:15:42,527 leverages representatives to help the executive weigh the 225 00:15:42,527 --> 00:15:44,863 pros and cons. The current temporary law in 226 00:15:44,863 --> 00:15:50,863 this ans allows some types of businesses to continue receiving 227 00:15:51,402 --> 00:15:53,670 licenses and let them renew licenses that expired more than 228 00:15:53,670 --> 00:15:58,209 nine months in exchange for a fine rather than starting the 229 00:15:58,209 --> 00:16:00,878 process over the vast majority of the provisions the 230 00:16:00,878 --> 00:16:05,780 councilmember pinto introduced in 2021 and approved in 2022 231 00:16:06,951 --> 00:16:08,485 would be left alone. There is one provision that did 232 00:16:08,485 --> 00:16:13,324 not come from dlcp, it has to do with towing companies. 233 00:16:13,324 --> 00:16:15,360 we require some courtesy and repair towing companies to 234 00:16:15,360 --> 00:16:19,898 identify an impound lot when impounding is never part of 235 00:16:19,898 --> 00:16:22,900 their business model and my ans would fix that. 236 00:16:22,900 --> 00:16:28,105 without a movie amendment, substitute to 26-494 and urge 237 00:16:28,105 --> 00:16:31,705 colleagues to support it. Thank you. 238 00:16:35,312 --> 00:16:39,517 chairperson mendelson: you moved the amendment nature of the 239 00:16:39,517 --> 00:16:41,118 substitute, correct? Councilmember nadeau: yes. 240 00:16:41,118 --> 00:16:45,918 chairperson mendelson: is there discussion on the amendment? 241 00:16:45,923 --> 00:16:48,926 the vote will be on the amendment nature of the tubs to 242 00:16:48,926 --> 00:16:51,128 peer at all those in favor say aye. 243 00:16:51,128 --> 00:16:56,528 are there any opposed? The ayes have it unanimously. 244 00:16:57,535 --> 00:17:03,441 now we have the bill as amended. Is there discussion on the bill? 245 00:17:03,441 --> 00:17:07,946 the vote is on bill 26-494 as amended. 246 00:17:07,946 --> 00:17:11,248 all those of -- in favor say aye . 247 00:17:11,248 --> 00:17:14,485 any opposed? Hearing none the ayes have it 248 00:17:14,485 --> 00:17:18,685 , unanimously. We will turn to bill 26-430, 249 00:17:25,295 --> 00:17:27,965 education code adjustments amendments act of 2026. 250 00:17:27,965 --> 00:17:33,365 this is final reading. I circulated an amendment nature 251 00:17:35,706 --> 00:17:38,509 of the substitute. We talked about this briefly at 252 00:17:38,509 --> 00:17:42,109 breakfast. There are number of changes 253 00:17:43,180 --> 00:17:46,917 throughout the engrossed version but there are also seven 254 00:17:46,917 --> 00:17:51,188 sections that are newly added since this was brought up at the 255 00:17:51,188 --> 00:17:53,924 breakfast. I will go over what they are 256 00:17:53,924 --> 00:17:56,327 briefly. I don't think any of this is 257 00:17:56,327 --> 00:18:01,127 controversial so section 4, lead exposure prevention, a new 258 00:18:02,934 --> 00:18:07,537 section that aligns statutory language with other agencies and 259 00:18:07,537 --> 00:18:12,610 eases administrative burden by making an annual report biannual 260 00:18:12,610 --> 00:18:15,100 . Section six childcare bureau 261 00:18:15,546 --> 00:18:19,883 ,ans, repeals the childcare bureau which no longer exists. 262 00:18:19,883 --> 00:18:23,154 it was expected to provide the district government with a 263 00:18:23,154 --> 00:18:25,490 single administrative focused on childcare and has since been 264 00:18:25,490 --> 00:18:30,930 subsumed within the division of early learning within osse. 265 00:18:30,930 --> 00:18:34,293 section 17, green and sustainable schools, in early 266 00:18:35,166 --> 00:18:38,436 2026 the u.s. Department of education paused its green 267 00:18:38,436 --> 00:18:43,174 ribbon schools program, revise the language in the healthy 268 00:18:43,174 --> 00:18:48,312 schools act to reflect that change and provide osse a means 269 00:18:48,312 --> 00:18:50,915 to recognize school achievements and green initiatives. 270 00:18:50,915 --> 00:18:56,315 moreover the lang which requires the environment -- language 271 00:18:57,254 --> 00:19:01,859 provides a stipend and requires schools to participate because 272 00:19:01,859 --> 00:19:03,527 funding has not been appropriated it has never been 273 00:19:03,527 --> 00:19:07,727 appropriated for these. Section 21, new osse nonpublic 274 00:19:11,868 --> 00:19:16,668 basement one time report. Ans removes the one-time 275 00:19:16,741 --> 00:19:20,611 reporting requirement to review the process of appealing osse's 276 00:19:20,611 --> 00:19:26,611 decision to deny, revoke or approve for chilled -- students 277 00:19:26,818 --> 00:19:30,418 with disabilities. And issuing subpoenas, this 278 00:19:31,422 --> 00:19:36,694 grants osse authority to issue ministries of subpoenas to 279 00:19:36,694 --> 00:19:38,763 conduct enrollment and residency investigations. 280 00:19:38,763 --> 00:19:44,763 it is limited to enrollment. Osse through its office of 281 00:19:46,371 --> 00:19:49,640 enrollment registration is responsible for investigating 282 00:19:49,640 --> 00:19:55,400 enrollment and residency matters but cannot compel production of 283 00:19:55,645 --> 00:19:56,713 records during the investigative stage. 284 00:19:56,713 --> 00:20:00,385 often delaying access to credible -- prickle 285 00:20:00,385 --> 00:20:02,785 documentation. Section 22 course data 286 00:20:02,820 --> 00:20:06,420 collection, osse has oversight responsibilities including 287 00:20:07,459 --> 00:20:11,590 school performance, students with disabilities, state 288 00:20:11,862 --> 00:20:16,620 academic standards. However osse cannot compel lea's 289 00:20:18,669 --> 00:20:20,738 to share information about courses offered or taught. 290 00:20:20,738 --> 00:20:23,474 this provision requires them to submit course offerings and 291 00:20:23,474 --> 00:20:27,674 curriculum to osse upon request. Section 27, coronavirus 292 00:20:29,547 --> 00:20:33,747 immunization regulations. Ans repeals the requirement osse 293 00:20:37,188 --> 00:20:40,788 -- for license job developments staff. 294 00:20:41,959 --> 00:20:44,762 the council repealed the requirement for students to be 295 00:20:44,762 --> 00:20:47,431 immunized does not repealed the requirement that osse issue 296 00:20:47,431 --> 00:20:51,502 these regulations. Those are the new provisions in 297 00:20:51,502 --> 00:20:55,102 the amendment, nature of the substitute. 298 00:20:55,740 --> 00:20:56,841 I move the amendment, is there discussion? 299 00:20:56,841 --> 00:20:59,241 >> mr. Chairman. Chairperson mendelson: 300 00:21:01,245 --> 00:21:04,315 councilmember parker. Councilmember parker: I agree, 301 00:21:04,315 --> 00:21:07,717 much of what you conclude is not controversial but we did have a 302 00:21:07,717 --> 00:21:10,722 conversation at the breakfast that I think is worth having on 303 00:21:10,722 --> 00:21:16,793 the public record and that is simply to propose, not today but 304 00:21:16,793 --> 00:21:22,133 in the near future granting osse the authority as our state 305 00:21:22,133 --> 00:21:26,704 education authority or agency rather to be able to compel 306 00:21:26,704 --> 00:21:31,504 information for alllea's. We are piecemealing and in 307 00:21:32,409 --> 00:21:36,681 recent years have given osse authority over limited areas. 308 00:21:36,681 --> 00:21:42,219 in this instance we are printing osse to request course data and 309 00:21:42,219 --> 00:21:48,158 that may seem innocuous enough but it strikes me as odd that we 310 00:21:48,158 --> 00:21:52,672 would not more fully empower our state education agency to work 311 00:21:52,672 --> 00:21:58,720 with lea's. It is something I hope to work 312 00:21:58,710 --> 00:22:01,313 with you perhaps this year or the near future not to undermine 313 00:22:01,313 --> 00:22:05,185 lea autonomy and specifically this is of interest with our 314 00:22:05,185 --> 00:22:09,385 charters. To empower osse to step into 315 00:22:10,456 --> 00:22:14,656 that role as a state education agency. 316 00:22:15,761 --> 00:22:18,300 there are areas like financial records, health records. 317 00:22:18,300 --> 00:22:24,300 we heard from the mpd chief previously there are certain 318 00:22:24,337 --> 00:22:28,407 background and criminal records they have struggled to get from 319 00:22:28,407 --> 00:22:33,979 some of our lea's. It seems odd we would not be 320 00:22:33,979 --> 00:22:36,782 moving toward a more empowered state education agency. 321 00:22:36,782 --> 00:22:39,850 I support what we are doing today but hopefully we can work 322 00:22:39,850 --> 00:22:41,354 together in the near future. Thank you. 323 00:22:41,354 --> 00:22:46,459 chairperson mendelson: I think I will leave it rather than 324 00:22:46,459 --> 00:22:50,659 responding and getting into it. Further discussion? 325 00:22:50,963 --> 00:22:53,632 we have the amendment, nature of the substitute before us. 326 00:22:53,632 --> 00:22:58,432 all those in favor say aye. Any opposed? 327 00:22:59,271 --> 00:23:05,871 the ayes have it unanimously. We have the bill as amended. 328 00:23:06,179 --> 00:23:08,981 is there further discussion? The vote is on bill 26-430 as 329 00:23:08,981 --> 00:23:11,717 amended it all those in favor say aye. 330 00:23:11,717 --> 00:23:14,987 any opposed? Hearing none the ayes have it 331 00:23:14,987 --> 00:23:18,587 unanimously. Before we go to emergency 332 00:23:33,500 --> 00:23:37,750 legislation, let's go back. That is how we move forward, we 333 00:23:37,750 --> 00:23:43,282 go backwards, to item one on the nonconsent agenda which is the 334 00:23:43,282 --> 00:23:47,482 resale act, bill 26-224, restricting agree just 335 00:23:50,790 --> 00:23:54,390 --egregious scalping. Councilmember nadeau: thank you, 336 00:23:54,827 --> 00:23:59,270 chairman. I have already spoken to the 337 00:23:59,165 --> 00:24:00,966 bill today so for the purposes of the legislative meeting I 338 00:24:00,966 --> 00:24:05,766 will say so moved. Chairperson mendelson: thank you 339 00:24:07,390 --> 00:24:09,175 paired we have the bill before us. 340 00:24:09,175 --> 00:24:14,575 I suspect I should recognize either councilmember allen or-- 341 00:24:19,852 --> 00:24:23,722 councilmember allen: I'm happy to go first. 342 00:24:23,722 --> 00:24:25,580 I want to start off by thinking my colleague councilmember 343 00:24:25,580 --> 00:24:29,462 nadeau and the team for moving this forward and the committee 344 00:24:29,462 --> 00:24:33,666 on public works and operations. Committee print has some of the 345 00:24:33,666 --> 00:24:36,869 strongest protections for concertgoers in the district. 346 00:24:36,869 --> 00:24:41,273 the practice of selling speculative ticketed -- tickets, 347 00:24:41,273 --> 00:24:43,477 tickets you don't even have because they have not gone on 348 00:24:43,477 --> 00:24:47,120 sale yet, is prohibited. If you're in the practice of 349 00:24:47,120 --> 00:24:52,418 scooping up tickets at the box office, please do not, you have 350 00:24:52,418 --> 00:24:57,818 to obtain a 25,000 surety bond making sure concertgoers have 351 00:24:58,824 --> 00:25:01,527 recourse for tickets that are fake or not delivered. 352 00:25:01,527 --> 00:25:04,196 and the print requirement if you're going to list a ticket 353 00:25:04,196 --> 00:25:05,632 for resale you have to disclose the original price you got it 354 00:25:05,632 --> 00:25:09,232 for. Transparency is a great thing. 355 00:25:09,335 --> 00:25:12,471 I introduce this bill to solve a problem that is made ticket 356 00:25:12,471 --> 00:25:16,108 buying an experience that is inexpensive nightmare. 357 00:25:16,108 --> 00:25:19,512 middlemen use bots and technology to scoop up large 358 00:25:19,512 --> 00:25:23,516 swallows of tickets forcing you into the secondary market were 359 00:25:23,516 --> 00:25:25,784 tickets will be up to 50 times higher than the original box 360 00:25:25,784 --> 00:25:28,120 office price. When you get into a digital 361 00:25:28,120 --> 00:25:33,325 queue, you're beaten to the purchase by a robot, not fellow 362 00:25:33,325 --> 00:25:35,928 music fans per even chose not likely to sell out, if you 363 00:25:35,928 --> 00:25:39,131 search for tickets most of the results are from secondhand 364 00:25:39,131 --> 00:25:43,502 sellers, not the box office or this causes problems. 365 00:25:43,502 --> 00:25:46,272 this is a numbers game where the resellers by as many tickets as 366 00:25:46,272 --> 00:25:50,342 they can, mark them up and even if they only sell five at $1000 367 00:25:50,342 --> 00:25:52,879 they have made a tidy profit. The rest of the tickets may even 368 00:25:52,879 --> 00:25:55,915 go unused. If you have a situation where 369 00:25:55,915 --> 00:25:57,616 people are priced out of tickets to a show, there are empty 370 00:25:57,616 --> 00:26:01,216 seats. Second, you spend $1000 on a 371 00:26:01,354 --> 00:26:04,689 ticket to see your favorite band, that is where your 372 00:26:04,689 --> 00:26:08,628 spending goes. You are less likely to go to 373 00:26:08,628 --> 00:26:15,334 other shows or go out to dinner before or after ,buy merch. 374 00:26:15,334 --> 00:26:19,305 third, it makes our live music and theater a luxury good, just 375 00:26:19,305 --> 00:26:20,873 one more thing being commodified. 376 00:26:20,873 --> 00:26:22,908 music and culture is for all of us. 377 00:26:22,908 --> 00:26:28,447 a thriving arts scene is essential to a thriving city. 378 00:26:28,447 --> 00:26:31,783 artists want all to attend. The secondhand market turned it 379 00:26:31,783 --> 00:26:37,183 on its head. It is not a hypothetical issue. 380 00:26:37,189 --> 00:26:40,259 anthem's box office talked about how regularly fans showed up 381 00:26:40,259 --> 00:26:45,590 with fake tickets. Hamilton said it was advertised 382 00:26:46,320 --> 00:26:50,903 vip sections that don't exist. Bots are cannibalizing ticket 383 00:26:50,903 --> 00:26:53,673 sales and they are losing tens of thousands of dollars to run 384 00:26:53,673 --> 00:26:57,810 operations. Artist have said the price cap 385 00:26:57,810 --> 00:27:00,947 makes the district a more attractive place to book a show 386 00:27:00,947 --> 00:27:02,816 because they are tired of their fans getting ripped off and we 387 00:27:02,816 --> 00:27:08,216 should be, too. The topic of how tickets prices 388 00:27:08,420 --> 00:27:11,757 are set and manipulated is complex. 389 00:27:11,757 --> 00:27:14,961 a ton of money is made by scalpers who understand coding 390 00:27:14,961 --> 00:27:18,964 and ai, who do not live here or offer value or the risk of 391 00:27:18,964 --> 00:27:22,350 putting on a show. If you put a cap on the profit 392 00:27:22,350 --> 00:27:27,473 you change the math for them. Council member henderson and I 393 00:27:27,473 --> 00:27:31,110 will have an amendment to protect folks that want to go to 394 00:27:31,110 --> 00:27:33,711 a show, protect venues from predatory practices and maintain 395 00:27:33,711 --> 00:27:37,316 strongest protections that came out of the committee. 396 00:27:37,316 --> 00:27:41,120 three main areas, it restores the 10% price cap on reselling 397 00:27:41,120 --> 00:27:42,588 tickets to provide immediate relief to concert and 398 00:27:42,588 --> 00:27:46,188 theatergoers. Second, it narrows and clarifies 399 00:27:46,458 --> 00:27:49,795 rulemaking to focus on predatory platform fees that drive costs 400 00:27:49,795 --> 00:27:53,599 up and third it adds further protections against platforms 401 00:27:53,599 --> 00:27:56,268 that use personal identifying information and surveillance 402 00:27:56,268 --> 00:27:58,700 based pricing to discriminate because different people, 403 00:27:58,700 --> 00:28:02,678 different costs and values depending on the data. 404 00:28:02,678 --> 00:28:06,414 I want to thank councilmembers nadeau and henderson in their 405 00:28:06,414 --> 00:28:08,917 teens for working with us on this amendment. 406 00:28:08,917 --> 00:28:12,620 I ask my colleagues for support and I move the amendment and 407 00:28:12,620 --> 00:28:13,755 hope to hear from councilmember henderson as well. 408 00:28:13,755 --> 00:28:15,757 chairperson mendelson: thank you. 409 00:28:15,757 --> 00:28:18,157 councilmember henderson: thank you. 410 00:28:19,928 --> 00:28:22,230 I originally signed onto the resale act when it was 411 00:28:22,230 --> 00:28:28,603 introduced because I believe the leader -- the district, is a 412 00:28:28,603 --> 00:28:31,640 leader in superior entertainment experiences and move -- music 413 00:28:31,640 --> 00:28:35,244 culture. I want our venues to thrive in 414 00:28:35,244 --> 00:28:39,448 entertainers to choose the district, and fans to be able to 415 00:28:39,448 --> 00:28:44,387 attend and enjoy all our venues without the unnecessary 416 00:28:44,387 --> 00:28:50,259 heartbreak that comes from when tickets don't work out on the 417 00:28:50,259 --> 00:28:56,498 secondary and resale market. I come at this not just from the 418 00:28:56,498 --> 00:28:59,735 perspective as a lawmaker but a genuine fan. 419 00:28:59,735 --> 00:29:03,271 there are countless stories of individuals who, they bought 420 00:29:03,271 --> 00:29:08,443 tickets from a reese taylor, arrived -- resaler, arrived at 421 00:29:08,443 --> 00:29:12,614 the venue excited, only for the ticket not to be eligible to be 422 00:29:12,614 --> 00:29:16,585 scanned and the venue to tell them, so sorry, you bought a 423 00:29:16,585 --> 00:29:19,821 fraudulent ticket and will not be able to atten today's 424 00:29:19,821 --> 00:29:21,422 events. There are lots of other things 425 00:29:21,422 --> 00:29:26,227 as well in this bill that have not been covered which is around 426 00:29:26,227 --> 00:29:31,270 the all end pricing. Nothing more frustrating when 427 00:29:32,434 --> 00:29:34,102 you're in line on ticketmaster and have an idea of what the 428 00:29:34,102 --> 00:29:39,174 ticket is supposed to cost, only to beat out the bots to get 429 00:29:39,174 --> 00:29:43,412 there and you hit check out, and you notice because of taxes and 430 00:29:43,412 --> 00:29:47,249 fees and other things, pricing that was not upfront available 431 00:29:47,249 --> 00:29:51,119 to you, you have now been priced out of the ability to even 432 00:29:51,119 --> 00:29:54,922 afford the ticket. This legislation does not solve 433 00:29:54,922 --> 00:29:58,194 all things. I repeat, this legislation does 434 00:29:58,194 --> 00:30:01,620 not solve all things. It is dealing with the secondary 435 00:30:01,620 --> 00:30:03,331 market. There are definitely issues with 436 00:30:03,331 --> 00:30:07,802 the primary market that this bill does not touch, but I feel 437 00:30:07,802 --> 00:30:10,205 like overtime we are able to have more conversations about 438 00:30:10,205 --> 00:30:14,109 that such as dynamic pricing and other things. 439 00:30:14,109 --> 00:30:17,479 I think the amendment before us today strikes the right balance. 440 00:30:17,479 --> 00:30:20,348 it moves and some of the complicating factors around 441 00:30:20,348 --> 00:30:24,887 primary that was included in the original committee print, and 442 00:30:24,887 --> 00:30:27,356 also just some other things. One other piece I want to 443 00:30:27,356 --> 00:30:33,280 mention that is a great thing about the resale act overall is 444 00:30:33,280 --> 00:30:35,630 about the issue of speculative tickets. 445 00:30:35,630 --> 00:30:39,901 this has come up a lot in sort of the sports context lately 446 00:30:39,901 --> 00:30:43,405 around world cup where we are seeing lots of people who bought 447 00:30:43,405 --> 00:30:47,776 tickets they bought flights,, they bought hotels, they did all 448 00:30:47,776 --> 00:30:51,579 of these things only to arrive and the seller not actually have 449 00:30:51,579 --> 00:30:56,351 the ticket available to them. We see this happening often, 450 00:30:56,351 --> 00:31:01,390 even in the concert space of sellers offering for sale 451 00:31:01,390 --> 00:31:06,128 tickets that are actually not available on the market and then 452 00:31:06,128 --> 00:31:08,830 they are not able to deliver on those as well. 453 00:31:08,830 --> 00:31:14,603 my support for this is about protecting our venues and the 454 00:31:14,603 --> 00:31:19,740 fan experience at the end of the day so I hope colleagues can 455 00:31:19,740 --> 00:31:20,875 support this amendment and the overall legislation going 456 00:31:20,875 --> 00:31:21,409 forward. Thank you. 457 00:31:21,409 --> 00:31:27,616 chairperson mendelson: so would one of you explain in a little 458 00:31:27,616 --> 00:31:31,816 bit more detail what this amendment does? 459 00:31:32,688 --> 00:31:37,558 councilmember allen: sure. We can do rock, paper, scissors 460 00:31:37,558 --> 00:31:41,329 for it. I can briefly go through that. 461 00:31:41,329 --> 00:31:46,101 first, it restores the price cap, which was initially in the 462 00:31:46,101 --> 00:31:50,972 introduced version of the bill. What this does is put a 10% cap 463 00:31:50,972 --> 00:31:52,474 on the resale of the ticket. Chairperson mendelson: secondary 464 00:31:52,474 --> 00:31:54,874 market. Councilmember allen: secondary 465 00:31:56,445 --> 00:31:59,915 market, that is number one. Chairperson mendelson: if I may 466 00:31:59,915 --> 00:32:03,651 interrupt, to clarify, there could be additional fees. 467 00:32:03,651 --> 00:32:06,988 we discussed this at breakfast. Do you want to explain that? 468 00:32:06,988 --> 00:32:12,394 councilmember allen: sure. The bill sets a price cap at the 469 00:32:12,394 --> 00:32:15,664 total cost of the initial ticket plus up to 10%. 470 00:32:15,664 --> 00:32:18,400 it also permits a secondary ticket exchange to charge a fee 471 00:32:18,400 --> 00:32:20,869 for the service of providing a marketplace for the resale of 472 00:32:20,869 --> 00:32:24,405 the ticket provided the fee does not exceed 10% of the price of 473 00:32:24,405 --> 00:32:27,676 the initial ticket. Chairperson mendelson: keep 474 00:32:27,676 --> 00:32:29,676 going. Yes. 475 00:32:29,911 --> 00:32:32,911 councilmember allen: councilmember henderson talked 476 00:32:34,282 --> 00:32:38,152 about this, changes the amendment makes related to the 477 00:32:38,152 --> 00:32:42,690 print version around the authority of the mayor to issue 478 00:32:42,690 --> 00:32:47,962 rules related to fees. It narrows and clarifies that to 479 00:32:47,962 --> 00:32:52,670 focus on the platform fees, not the venue fees. 480 00:32:52,670 --> 00:32:54,702 so it is specific to the platform fees. 481 00:32:54,702 --> 00:32:56,371 chairperson mendelson: and that is meant to address concern that 482 00:32:56,371 --> 00:33:02,444 some venues raised they are affected by -- they are worried 483 00:33:02,444 --> 00:33:04,712 they would be affected by the broader mayoral rulemaking 484 00:33:04,712 --> 00:33:07,112 authority. Councilmember allen: correct. 485 00:33:07,949 --> 00:33:14,189 in addition, in terms of what the committee had put forward in 486 00:33:14,189 --> 00:33:16,324 terms of creating a regulatory regime around this, it allows 487 00:33:16,324 --> 00:33:19,193 the mayor after a year to be able to come back and take a 488 00:33:19,193 --> 00:33:22,596 look at that price cap. So we will evaluate, is it 489 00:33:22,596 --> 00:33:25,467 working the way we wanted? Does it need to be adjusted in 490 00:33:25,467 --> 00:33:27,870 some way? That is the changes as it 491 00:33:27,870 --> 00:33:31,470 relates to the mayor's authority there. 492 00:33:31,806 --> 00:33:35,676 and then it also focuses on prohibiting surveillance based 493 00:33:35,676 --> 00:33:39,413 price discrimination. And so this is if all of us 494 00:33:39,413 --> 00:33:41,750 wanted to go see a show right now and everybody login on the 495 00:33:41,750 --> 00:33:47,490 same platform, is quite possible we will all get slightly 496 00:33:47,490 --> 00:33:49,758 different prices based on that because there is a lot of data 497 00:33:49,758 --> 00:33:52,260 mining, information that figures out who I am compared to you, 498 00:33:52,260 --> 00:33:57,633 and the price reflects that. That is discrimination in price. 499 00:33:57,633 --> 00:34:00,340 so it prohibits debt, which I think is a smart protection for 500 00:34:00,340 --> 00:34:02,237 our primary marketplace as well. Chairperson mendelson: that is 501 00:34:02,237 --> 00:34:07,370 both primary and secondary. Chairman alan -- councilmember 502 00:34:07,142 --> 00:34:11,942 allen: yes but on the primary space more. 503 00:34:12,882 --> 00:34:19,188 in a the applicable and because because there is linkage with 504 00:34:19,188 --> 00:34:20,790 the clause. Chairperson mendelson: 505 00:34:20,790 --> 00:34:24,390 councilmember nadeau. Councilmember nadeau: thank you, 506 00:34:25,727 --> 00:34:29,640 I appreciate that, mr. Chairman. As I mentioned in the committee 507 00:34:29,640 --> 00:34:32,401 of the whole, I am proud of the work we did in committee to 508 00:34:32,401 --> 00:34:36,473 evaluate this bill and strengthen it to advance 509 00:34:36,473 --> 00:34:41,677 consumer protection. We would add a new provision to 510 00:34:41,677 --> 00:34:44,614 address high costs in the primary and secondary markets 511 00:34:44,614 --> 00:34:48,350 including but not limited to the authority to resale prices, cap 512 00:34:48,350 --> 00:34:53,150 ticket sales fees, and regulate f predatory pricing. 513 00:34:54,823 --> 00:34:58,894 late last week, I heard feedback the rulemaking 514 00:34:58,894 --> 00:35:06,940 provision and I had come in today expecting we would work on 515 00:35:06,235 --> 00:35:09,710 that between first and second reading. 516 00:35:09,710 --> 00:35:15,671 what I came to understand this morning from colleagues was that 517 00:35:15,978 --> 00:35:21,978 there was interest in a more broad set of tweaks. 518 00:35:23,953 --> 00:35:29,192 so, although I have reservations with instituting an immediate 519 00:35:29,192 --> 00:35:33,162 secondary market cap without a similar ability to address the 520 00:35:33,162 --> 00:35:37,466 skyrocketing primary prices in response, I do appreciate that 521 00:35:37,466 --> 00:35:41,203 this amendment preserves flexibility in the price cap 522 00:35:41,203 --> 00:35:43,939 itself so the district can be more responsive to address a 523 00:35:43,939 --> 00:35:48,278 rapidly evolving market. I am also glad we can address 524 00:35:48,278 --> 00:35:50,312 surveillance pricing in this amendment. 525 00:35:50,312 --> 00:35:53,783 I do still hold concerns this does not provide the ability to 526 00:35:53,783 --> 00:35:57,983 tackle other dynamic pricing strategies, but surveillance 527 00:35:58,200 --> 00:36:00,356 pricing that discriminate against individuals is clearly 528 00:36:00,356 --> 00:36:05,627 the most egregious, to borrow a word from the bill title. 529 00:36:05,627 --> 00:36:08,430 despite my reservations, the other aspect of the amendment my 530 00:36:08,430 --> 00:36:10,365 colleagues described will I believe make a positive 531 00:36:10,365 --> 00:36:14,170 difference for consumers and the amount of material we agree on 532 00:36:14,170 --> 00:36:16,440 is much greater than what we disagree on so I will be 533 00:36:16,440 --> 00:36:18,307 supporting the amendment. Thank you, chairman. 534 00:36:18,307 --> 00:36:20,707 chairperson mendelson: thank you. 535 00:36:20,710 --> 00:36:24,447 councilmember trayon white. Councilmember white: thank you, 536 00:36:24,447 --> 00:36:27,916 chairman. I have a question to get 537 00:36:27,916 --> 00:36:30,919 something ready. I no one of the reasons was to 538 00:36:30,919 --> 00:36:36,919 address the issue of price gouging, especially in the bo 539 00:36:37,126 --> 00:36:40,128 markett where people are buying tickets and telling them for 540 00:36:40,128 --> 00:36:43,532 higher prices. From these amendments we got 541 00:36:43,532 --> 00:36:47,937 just now, how does it affect those who have tickets that are 542 00:36:47,937 --> 00:36:49,138 reselling their personal tickets? 543 00:36:49,138 --> 00:36:54,810 does it apply to all or just businesses or investors who are 544 00:36:54,810 --> 00:36:58,410 doing this? Chairperson mendelson: who do 545 00:37:00,682 --> 00:37:03,552 you want to answer that question? 546 00:37:03,552 --> 00:37:04,554 councilmember white: whoever has the ability to answer. 547 00:37:04,554 --> 00:37:06,954 chairperson mendelson: councilmember nadeau? 548 00:37:07,890 --> 00:37:12,361 councilmember nadeau: we address that in the print itself by 549 00:37:12,361 --> 00:37:15,961 including provisions that councilmember allen introduced 550 00:37:16,980 --> 00:37:18,340 in the underlying bill. Councilmember white: I am still 551 00:37:18,340 --> 00:37:22,834 not clear. Is it for everybody or just 552 00:37:24,775 --> 00:37:29,377 large investors or businesses? Councilmember nadeau: so the 553 00:37:29,377 --> 00:37:34,251 practice you are describing is called -- sorry, the word is 554 00:37:34,251 --> 00:37:37,720 escaping me. It has been a long day. 555 00:37:37,720 --> 00:37:41,858 the speculative purchasing where someone buys up a bunch of 556 00:37:41,858 --> 00:37:46,658 tickets and then resells them. Councilmember white: yeah. 557 00:37:48,970 --> 00:37:51,468 there is a difference between somebody buying 1000 tickets or 558 00:37:51,468 --> 00:37:54,270 one or two tickets and reselling them. 559 00:37:54,270 --> 00:37:56,872 I am trying to figure out the bill differentiation. 560 00:37:56,872 --> 00:38:02,272 is this broad for everybody? I think charles -- 561 00:38:02,678 --> 00:38:08,780 councilmember and nad nadeau: y. My brain fizzled out. 562 00:38:11,487 --> 00:38:15,958 >> I am going to sell my tickets to you. 563 00:38:15,958 --> 00:38:18,861 we are able to have that personal exchange. 564 00:38:18,861 --> 00:38:21,363 the price cap still applies. I cannot gouge you either for 565 00:38:21,363 --> 00:38:25,167 that ticket. The biggest change you will see 566 00:38:25,167 --> 00:38:29,305 is scalping used to be, you know, somebody stood outside a 567 00:38:29,305 --> 00:38:34,760 venue with two, four tickets trying to sell them. 568 00:38:34,760 --> 00:38:36,278 that is not how scalping works anymore. 569 00:38:36,278 --> 00:38:40,482 what you see is these massive platforms have been built. 570 00:38:40,482 --> 00:38:43,886 if you and I cannot go to the show anymore, I just want to 571 00:38:43,886 --> 00:38:47,256 sell you my tickets, I don't have to register with dlcp or do 572 00:38:47,256 --> 00:38:52,127 any of that type of stuff. If I am a business is getting 573 00:38:52,127 --> 00:38:53,396 hundreds and hundreds of tickets and this is my business and I 574 00:38:53,396 --> 00:38:59,534 have to be registered with dlcp and have to carry my 575 00:38:59,534 --> 00:39:01,337 maturity bond, I have to make sure I am good on that. 576 00:39:01,337 --> 00:39:07,476 the price cap is across the board but if I am buying a 577 00:39:07,476 --> 00:39:09,145 bunch of tickets and reselling them come I would have to 578 00:39:09,145 --> 00:39:12,347 register but it would not affect my ability to sell my two to 579 00:39:12,347 --> 00:39:14,516 you. Councilmember white: got it. 580 00:39:14,516 --> 00:39:19,556 what would trigger for them to report they are a business or 581 00:39:19,556 --> 00:39:23,692 they purchased both tickets? Some purchase small amounts of 582 00:39:23,692 --> 00:39:28,363 tickets and do the same thing. Councilmember allen: you have to 583 00:39:28,363 --> 00:39:30,532 sell and this more than 50 tickets per year. 584 00:39:30,532 --> 00:39:33,702 I have a show or a game I cannot go to and I sell them to you and 585 00:39:33,702 --> 00:39:38,390 maybe next week I sell them to fill, that will not be 50 so I 586 00:39:38,390 --> 00:39:41,643 don't have to register anything. But if I am more than 50, is a 587 00:39:41,643 --> 00:39:43,913 business. Councilmember white: got you. 588 00:39:43,913 --> 00:39:45,246 thank you. Councilmember allen: thanks. 589 00:39:45,246 --> 00:39:48,716 chairperson mendelson: thank you, counsel number. 590 00:39:48,716 --> 00:39:52,316 councilmember pinto. Councilmember pinto: thank you 591 00:39:52,321 --> 00:39:56,925 so much councilmembers for working on this important issue. 592 00:39:56,925 --> 00:40:02,640 I am in agreement that d.c. Is a world-class city and we need to 593 00:40:02,640 --> 00:40:06,334 support our incredible venues and artists and preserve the 594 00:40:06,334 --> 00:40:09,672 ability for our residents and fans to go see shows and for 595 00:40:09,672 --> 00:40:12,341 people to come from around the country in the world to these 596 00:40:12,341 --> 00:40:16,545 incredible venues. What we are doing today, we have 597 00:40:16,545 --> 00:40:21,737 to be particularly mindful to. I appreciate the changes in the 598 00:40:21,737 --> 00:40:25,541 amendment that councilmember allen and henderson have 599 00:40:25,541 --> 00:40:28,977 circulated that kind of restore some of the initial language 600 00:40:28,977 --> 00:40:32,981 from the bill. But I have a couple questions as 601 00:40:32,981 --> 00:40:37,781 I just read this language and the rationale. 602 00:40:39,722 --> 00:40:47,522 so, in section 2b, where it says in addition to the rules in 603 00:40:51,934 --> 00:40:57,934 subsection a, the mayor is authorized the rules for the 604 00:40:58,208 --> 00:41:03,608 service of providing the marketplace for the issuance or 605 00:41:03,612 --> 00:41:06,348 sale of an initial ticket. My understanding from this 606 00:41:06,348 --> 00:41:09,952 morning's discussion was the intention of the 607 00:41:09,952 --> 00:41:16,892 amendment was to go back to the original intention of the bill 608 00:41:16,892 --> 00:41:22,970 to regulate the secondary market as opposed to giving the mayor 609 00:41:22,970 --> 00:41:24,366 authority to regulate fees on the primary market. 610 00:41:24,366 --> 00:41:29,738 but this language seems just as concerning in that respect. 611 00:41:29,738 --> 00:41:32,738 yet, please. Councilmember allen: sure. 612 00:41:33,642 --> 00:41:38,580 through the chair, and I will turn to councilmember nadeau to 613 00:41:38,580 --> 00:41:39,982 add on as well, this is specifically to the platform 614 00:41:39,982 --> 00:41:43,285 fees. So not the venue fees. 615 00:41:43,285 --> 00:41:46,988 so this allows the mayor to be able to take a look at platform 616 00:41:46,988 --> 00:41:49,924 fees that are charged to the consumer. 617 00:41:49,924 --> 00:41:53,996 it is not the fees of the venue they have to say I will host 618 00:41:53,996 --> 00:41:57,332 this event. That was part of the original 619 00:41:57,332 --> 00:42:02,539 bill, not including venue fees, so this is only focusing on the 620 00:42:02,539 --> 00:42:07,339 platform fees, meaning the platform, the website, the 621 00:42:09,945 --> 00:42:15,945 company taking the sale. Anything you wanted to add to 622 00:42:16,352 --> 00:42:19,555 that, or did I described that correctly? 623 00:42:19,555 --> 00:42:24,293 councilmember nadeau: the goal is we can go after the primary 624 00:42:24,293 --> 00:42:27,229 market in a way that does not penalize local businesses 625 00:42:27,229 --> 00:42:29,898 basically. Councilmember pinto: I guess I 626 00:42:29,898 --> 00:42:32,501 don't see how this would not penalize local businesses if we 627 00:42:32,501 --> 00:42:37,940 are saying the mayor could regulate prices on the primary 628 00:42:37,940 --> 00:42:42,740 market, regardless of who is issuing the ticket. 629 00:42:42,845 --> 00:42:45,981 councilmember nadeau: it is real specific. 630 00:42:45,981 --> 00:42:49,184 we can look at it. Councilmember pinto: governing 631 00:42:49,184 --> 00:42:52,454 the fees for the service of providing a marketplace for the 632 00:42:52,454 --> 00:42:54,156 issuance or sale of an initial ticket. 633 00:42:54,156 --> 00:42:57,156 councilmember nadeau: fees. Fees, right? 634 00:42:58,193 --> 00:43:03,132 councilmember pinto: ok. So this is meant to be 635 00:43:03,132 --> 00:43:07,136 addressing tack on fees after the ticket price. 636 00:43:07,136 --> 00:43:09,536 I see. Thank you. 637 00:43:09,538 --> 00:43:14,338 that is helpful. There is language on the 638 00:43:15,878 --> 00:43:19,282 rationale that I just want to make sure I understand what this 639 00:43:19,282 --> 00:43:23,485 is corresponding to. This is on page three of the 640 00:43:23,485 --> 00:43:27,289 circulated amendment, the panel to the paragraph. 641 00:43:27,289 --> 00:43:29,825 the amendment preserves the ability for the mayor to 642 00:43:29,825 --> 00:43:34,230 regulate fees in the primary and secondary market, clarifies this 643 00:43:34,230 --> 00:43:37,399 authority applies only to fees assessed by the part from stem 644 00:43:37,399 --> 00:43:40,369 cells for providing a marketplace for the issuance 645 00:43:40,369 --> 00:43:44,641 sale and resale of tickets. So is this again corresponding 646 00:43:44,641 --> 00:43:47,743 to that previous language we just discussed just for fees? 647 00:43:47,743 --> 00:43:49,912 got it. Councilmember allen: correct. 648 00:43:49,912 --> 00:43:52,180 councilmember pinto: thank you very much. 649 00:43:52,180 --> 00:43:55,780 chairperson mendelson: thank you, councilmember pinto. 650 00:43:56,351 --> 00:43:59,951 councilmember parker. Councilmember parker: I'm sorry. 651 00:44:03,124 --> 00:44:05,127 councilmember henderson was distracting me. 652 00:44:05,127 --> 00:44:07,527 [laughter] chairperson mendelson: don't 653 00:44:08,264 --> 00:44:11,660 keep blaming other members. Councilmember parker: thank you, 654 00:44:11,660 --> 00:44:15,671 councilmembers. It seems like you all came to a 655 00:44:15,671 --> 00:44:18,740 pretty common sense compromise that I think works. 656 00:44:18,740 --> 00:44:23,144 I was proud to introduce the underlying measure. 657 00:44:23,144 --> 00:44:28,350 I have a couple questions. On the amendment, sections b and 658 00:44:28,350 --> 00:44:35,550 c, the 10% up sale. So if I resell a ticket, I can 659 00:44:36,159 --> 00:44:39,561 resell it up to 10%. That makes sense. 660 00:44:39,561 --> 00:44:46,761 then, c, if I exchange a ticket, I can charge an additional 10%. 661 00:44:47,340 --> 00:44:51,234 so now we are talking about to 20%. 662 00:44:52,106 --> 00:44:54,420 and I just want to make sure I am interpreting that the right 663 00:44:54,420 --> 00:44:57,642 way that the additional 10% is cumulative. 664 00:45:03,852 --> 00:45:08,520 I'm sorry. The question is, is the 665 00:45:08,257 --> 00:45:12,457 additional 10% in section c cumulative so the 666 00:45:16,197 --> 00:45:18,733 exchange price can be up to 20% of what the original ticket 667 00:45:18,733 --> 00:45:21,733 price was? Councilmember allen: correct, 668 00:45:23,472 --> 00:45:25,140 because you may have a situation where a part is charging a fee 669 00:45:25,140 --> 00:45:26,408 so you want to be able to include all of that. 670 00:45:26,408 --> 00:45:30,145 councilmember parker: that's when he percent must encompass 671 00:45:30,145 --> 00:45:32,146 all fees or the venue the seller and whatever the price of the 672 00:45:32,146 --> 00:45:34,749 ticket is? Councilmember allen: essentially 673 00:45:34,749 --> 00:45:36,618 you who bought the ticket, what you paid for. 674 00:45:36,618 --> 00:45:39,618 councilmember parker: two other things. 675 00:45:40,155 --> 00:45:45,894 I note that councilmember nadeau to her credit in the committee 676 00:45:45,894 --> 00:45:48,130 print was trying to regulate dynamic pricing. 677 00:45:48,130 --> 00:45:53,535 so dynamic pricing is this idea that when I go to buy my beyonce 678 00:45:53,535 --> 00:45:56,304 tickets, because we are all looking at the same time, the 679 00:45:56,304 --> 00:46:02,310 price is going up and up and up. With this amendment, now there 680 00:46:02,310 --> 00:46:05,910 is nothing dealing with dynamic pricing. 681 00:46:07,349 --> 00:46:12,654 and so let me ask it this way. Are the venues we care about, 682 00:46:12,654 --> 00:46:16,854 like the 930 club, concerned about dynamic pricing? 683 00:46:19,361 --> 00:46:23,664 my guess would be no. It seems like the only people 684 00:46:23,664 --> 00:46:27,136 that would be concerned about dynamic pricing would be these 685 00:46:27,136 --> 00:46:31,491 big sellers like ticketmaster. And so the question would be, 686 00:46:31,491 --> 00:46:35,691 why aren't we putting guardrails around that? 687 00:46:35,962 --> 00:46:39,699 not to complicate the amendment. I am glad you all reached a 688 00:46:39,699 --> 00:46:43,636 compromise, but that seems like one area we just did not touch. 689 00:46:43,636 --> 00:46:48,240 I just want to go back to the numbers that I quoted from the 690 00:46:48,240 --> 00:46:53,640 original complaint filed by the oag where retailers like 691 00:46:53,747 --> 00:46:57,947 ticketmaster upsell anywhere from 24% to 44% and consumers 692 00:47:00,520 --> 00:47:06,158 have paid more than $16 billion. I know that was not the original 693 00:47:06,158 --> 00:47:10,863 intent of your underlying bill. I'm sorry, mr. Chairman, if I 694 00:47:10,863 --> 00:47:12,165 can have more time. Chairperson mendelson: not much 695 00:47:12,165 --> 00:47:16,365 more. There is an answer to come. 696 00:47:16,870 --> 00:47:21,700 councilmember parker: councilmember allen, if you can 697 00:47:21,474 --> 00:47:25,278 just speak to all of that. [laughter] 698 00:47:25,278 --> 00:47:29,883 councilmember allen: thank you, councilmember, with all of your 699 00:47:29,883 --> 00:47:34,421 additional time. One of my colleagues said early 700 00:47:34,421 --> 00:47:38,824 on, let's be very clear, this bill is not all things for every 701 00:47:38,824 --> 00:47:40,159 single problem in this marketplace. 702 00:47:40,159 --> 00:47:42,559 so start there. Right? 703 00:47:43,296 --> 00:47:48,300 the name of the bill is the resale act so it is focused -- 704 00:47:48,300 --> 00:47:50,103 when it was introduced it was focused on the secondary and 705 00:47:50,103 --> 00:47:52,773 resale market. There were elements of the 706 00:47:52,773 --> 00:47:57,178 primary marketplace that I think became a pressing issue, so you 707 00:47:57,178 --> 00:48:01,581 see some of that inc. Here. I know that my colleagues 708 00:48:01,581 --> 00:48:03,116 introduced some legislation trying to get at some of these 709 00:48:03,116 --> 00:48:06,285 issues. So there are very likely to be 710 00:48:06,285 --> 00:48:09,890 more types of things to look at this. 711 00:48:09,890 --> 00:48:12,125 it did not include dynamic pricing in this. 712 00:48:12,125 --> 00:48:17,129 I also think from a policy perspective, we used a dynamic 713 00:48:17,129 --> 00:48:20,433 pricing and rationalized it in other policy spaces, so I don't 714 00:48:20,433 --> 00:48:22,433 know. Like parking. 715 00:48:24,738 --> 00:48:27,474 we used dynamic pricing for parking. 716 00:48:27,474 --> 00:48:31,879 if you have ever taken a ride on uber, if you took a toll road, 717 00:48:31,879 --> 00:48:33,513 we use dynamic pricing in a lot of ways. 718 00:48:33,513 --> 00:48:38,218 councilmember parker: I hear you and I respect that and I know we 719 00:48:38,218 --> 00:48:41,754 probably will not fix it now. I will throw it out there before 720 00:48:41,754 --> 00:48:44,959 second reading. It would be great if we can 721 00:48:44,959 --> 00:48:48,494 include that back into the provisions that he may hear in 722 00:48:48,494 --> 00:48:52,980 the future make be able -- future might be able to 723 00:48:52,980 --> 00:48:54,702 regulate. It sounds like there was a lot 724 00:48:54,702 --> 00:48:59,373 of testimony about that, and I can tell you from experience it 725 00:48:59,373 --> 00:49:01,908 is frustrating when I see the price of a concert jump by 726 00:49:01,908 --> 00:49:05,780 hundreds of dollars simply because everyone is interested. 727 00:49:05,780 --> 00:49:08,314 the only other thing I wanted to come to was enforcement. 728 00:49:08,314 --> 00:49:11,450 I know I have raised this multiple times, but I want to 729 00:49:11,450 --> 00:49:14,253 walk through this again. Maybe this is better geared 730 00:49:14,253 --> 00:49:19,530 towards councilmember nadeau. Enforcement I am clear is 731 00:49:21,194 --> 00:49:26,594 targeting bulks others. Let's say those -- bulk sellers, 732 00:49:28,133 --> 00:49:29,969 let's say those selling thousands. 733 00:49:29,969 --> 00:49:36,569 how will dlcp become aware of someone running afoul of these 734 00:49:38,378 --> 00:49:40,380 provisions, and what actually is the consequence? 735 00:49:40,380 --> 00:49:45,840 so I heard earlier they will receive a notice of infraction. 736 00:49:45,840 --> 00:49:47,484 great. Are there fines? 737 00:49:51,900 --> 00:49:54,426 is there a suspension of sorts? Can you speak to what the 738 00:49:54,426 --> 00:49:57,663 penalty is for not following the law? 739 00:49:57,663 --> 00:50:03,630 councilmember nadeau: yeah. And I actually will also just 740 00:50:04,504 --> 00:50:07,573 speak to your prior question also for a second. 741 00:50:07,573 --> 00:50:12,973 so, dynamic pricing includes prices that are both legitimate 742 00:50:14,915 --> 00:50:20,315 -- that vary for both legitimate and illegitimate reasons. 743 00:50:20,753 --> 00:50:23,656 the mayor would tackle those in the coming years through 744 00:50:23,656 --> 00:50:27,256 rulemaking. What the amendment does instead 745 00:50:28,394 --> 00:50:30,462 is focuses on the west obviously offensive form of dynamic 746 00:50:30,462 --> 00:50:32,398 pricing which is called surveillance pricing. 747 00:50:32,398 --> 00:50:36,202 that is what we were talking but earlier where prices are 748 00:50:36,202 --> 00:50:38,404 tailored to individual consumers based on activity that can 749 00:50:38,404 --> 00:50:41,140 correlate with demographics. That is in the amendment, which 750 00:50:41,140 --> 00:50:44,944 I think is good. We will also in committee be 751 00:50:44,944 --> 00:50:49,744 taking on surveillance pricing more broadly with councilmember 752 00:50:50,830 --> 00:50:54,821 henderson's bill on this issue, which also pertains to 753 00:50:54,821 --> 00:50:59,210 transportation, etc. Anyone who is selling over 50 754 00:51:01,361 --> 00:51:05,665 tickets on the platforms will have to register. 755 00:51:05,665 --> 00:51:11,104 so it is not just a big bulk. It is also sort of smaller bulk. 756 00:51:11,104 --> 00:51:11,971 that is where we set the threshold. 757 00:51:11,971 --> 00:51:16,308 councilmember parker: I'm sorry, if I could just jump in. 758 00:51:16,308 --> 00:51:17,377 I am genuinely trying to understand. 759 00:51:17,377 --> 00:51:22,777 how will dlcp know that councilmember allen is selling 760 00:51:24,500 --> 00:51:27,500 100 tickets? He should be registering. 761 00:51:27,253 --> 00:51:31,258 councilmember nadeau: I think I used the example earlier today 762 00:51:31,258 --> 00:51:34,258 of short-term family housing. Right? 763 00:51:35,600 --> 00:51:37,397 it has to be partnership between the regulatory agency and the 764 00:51:37,397 --> 00:51:39,998 platforms and the public. It is not an easy answer. 765 00:51:39,998 --> 00:51:42,168 councilmember parker: so they register. 766 00:51:42,168 --> 00:51:46,368 and what happens? Councilmember nadeau: and then 767 00:51:48,140 --> 00:51:54,747 -- ok, so they register. And then we know that they exist 768 00:51:54,747 --> 00:52:00,419 and they will be selling. And then there are requirements 769 00:52:00,419 --> 00:52:02,956 for the platforms to share expansive data, extensive data 770 00:52:02,956 --> 00:52:07,156 with dlcp. Councilmember allen put money in 771 00:52:07,226 --> 00:52:12,832 the budget to add staff to the department to assist with 772 00:52:12,832 --> 00:52:16,568 monitoring all of this. So we are setting ourselves up 773 00:52:16,568 --> 00:52:21,368 for success. And also, it will still take 774 00:52:21,907 --> 00:52:26,107 work to ensure. Councilmember parker: got you. 775 00:52:26,546 --> 00:52:29,315 one last follow-up question related to that. 776 00:52:29,315 --> 00:52:33,286 is there anyway to hold the big ticket sellers accountable, like 777 00:52:33,286 --> 00:52:37,900 ticketmaster, to not allow someone to gouge if we are 778 00:52:37,900 --> 00:52:40,910 saying in the law you cannot sell for more than 20%? 779 00:52:40,910 --> 00:52:43,179 it sounds like we are putting the onus on ourselves. 780 00:52:43,179 --> 00:52:47,383 and I hear you. I guess my concern is we are 781 00:52:47,383 --> 00:52:53,288 wrinkling and going through all of this -- wranglgiing and going 782 00:52:53,288 --> 00:52:55,424 through all of this but I am not convinced we will catch all of 783 00:52:55,424 --> 00:52:59,428 the bad actors. Councilmember nadeau: I think it 784 00:52:59,428 --> 00:53:01,297 is honestly like anything else we do appear. 785 00:53:01,297 --> 00:53:05,330 we have to constantly monitor and do oversight to make sure it 786 00:53:05,330 --> 00:53:09,438 is properly followed. I certainly will be leaving 787 00:53:09,438 --> 00:53:13,609 behind my book of tips and tricks when I leave this place, 788 00:53:13,609 --> 00:53:21,409 but I think that, again, it has to be a combination of consumers 789 00:53:22,318 --> 00:53:24,854 and the regulatory agency and the council working together to 790 00:53:24,854 --> 00:53:28,592 ensure, and the platforms, to ensure it all gets implemented 791 00:53:28,592 --> 00:53:32,327 with fidelity and what is intended here actually happens. 792 00:53:32,327 --> 00:53:38,800 I mean, one of the reasons I had given the mayor such broad 793 00:53:38,800 --> 00:53:41,103 regulatory authority was because we cannot anticipate everything. 794 00:53:41,103 --> 00:53:44,941 ideally she would not have to come back to us every time to 795 00:53:44,941 --> 00:53:49,741 catch up, to catch up with the industry. 796 00:53:49,912 --> 00:53:54,283 and so maybe we should look at that, tweaking that for a second 797 00:53:54,283 --> 00:53:56,819 reading. Because we did move pretty 798 00:53:56,819 --> 00:54:00,220 quickly today to try to address everybody's concerns. 799 00:54:00,220 --> 00:54:00,823 so, happy to talk more with folks. 800 00:54:00,823 --> 00:54:03,823 chairperson mendelson: thank you, councilmember. 801 00:54:03,993 --> 00:54:06,393 councilmember crawford. Councilmember crawford: 802 00:54:08,964 --> 00:54:13,502 councilmember parker already asked the question I had on what 803 00:54:13,502 --> 00:54:16,502 it affects, a cumulative 20% cap. 804 00:54:17,907 --> 00:54:19,108 that is important for after the meeting. 805 00:54:19,108 --> 00:54:20,476 thank you. Chairperson mendelson: 806 00:54:20,476 --> 00:54:24,760 councilmember frumin. Councilmember frumin: thank you, 807 00:54:25,181 --> 00:54:27,583 councilmembers. I think this is a good 808 00:54:27,583 --> 00:54:30,920 compromise. Really happy to see we have 809 00:54:30,920 --> 00:54:35,791 gotten to where we have gotten. I want to put a marker down on 810 00:54:35,791 --> 00:54:42,391 dynamic pricing because I would be reluctant to say that should 811 00:54:43,532 --> 00:54:45,935 just be designated as a rulemaking. 812 00:54:45,935 --> 00:54:48,204 I think we want to hear testimony on that. 813 00:54:48,204 --> 00:54:52,875 I think what is happening here is an effort to take the dollars 814 00:54:52,875 --> 00:54:58,275 from big platform international companies that are getting large 815 00:55:00,150 --> 00:55:02,851 fees and scalpers who are getting large profits and 816 00:55:02,851 --> 00:55:07,510 bringing dollars back to the venues themselves. 817 00:55:08,123 --> 00:55:11,494 I would want to hear from the venues because I would want to 818 00:55:11,494 --> 00:55:18,940 understand how when the prices of the tickets go up, to 819 00:55:18,500 --> 00:55:20,503 what extent the artists benefit from the higher revenue that 820 00:55:20,503 --> 00:55:24,373 comes in. I don't know the answer to that, 821 00:55:24,373 --> 00:55:28,376 but I would want to hear that. I would also want to hear from 822 00:55:28,376 --> 00:55:36,176 venues about -- I am sure venues have some shows that are very 823 00:55:36,418 --> 00:55:40,322 profitable and many shows that are not. 824 00:55:40,322 --> 00:55:47,610 and they provide a setting for folks to come out and begin to 825 00:55:47,610 --> 00:55:51,800 build a following. So I would not want to get too 826 00:55:51,800 --> 00:55:56,805 far out there in choking off their access to revenue from 827 00:55:56,805 --> 00:56:02,945 profitable shows because it may well be that they benefit from 828 00:56:02,945 --> 00:56:07,349 that but others benefit from that as well. 829 00:56:07,349 --> 00:56:11,554 I think it is sort of a complicated economic question, 830 00:56:11,554 --> 00:56:13,422 and I would not want to immediately say send it to 831 00:56:13,422 --> 00:56:16,492 rulemaking. I would want to hear from the 832 00:56:16,492 --> 00:56:20,629 front line players on that. But on what we have accomplished 833 00:56:20,629 --> 00:56:26,101 here today on what are the most egregious issues, I think a lot 834 00:56:26,101 --> 00:56:31,874 to be proud of and very grateful to those who worked on it. 835 00:56:31,874 --> 00:56:34,274 chairperson mendelson: thank you. 836 00:56:34,276 --> 00:56:38,381 if there is no further discussion -- oh, I'm sorry, 837 00:56:38,381 --> 00:56:40,448 councilmember pinto, second round. 838 00:56:40,448 --> 00:56:44,720 councilmember pinto: I'm sorry, and I know you all worked out 839 00:56:44,720 --> 00:56:48,457 this language but I am hearing from venues now about concerns 840 00:56:48,457 --> 00:56:53,929 around these fees because they receive money from the fees even 841 00:56:53,929 --> 00:56:59,929 if the ticket is being handled on a different platform. 842 00:57:01,804 --> 00:57:06,408 working on a compromise, but it still feels like the initial 843 00:57:06,408 --> 00:57:13,608 intention was really to focus on the secondary market and that a 844 00:57:13,948 --> 00:57:17,548 potentially unanticipated consequence of even this 845 00:57:18,120 --> 00:57:20,155 compromise language could be that our local venues get fewer 846 00:57:20,155 --> 00:57:23,755 fees than they are currently getting. 847 00:57:25,994 --> 00:57:31,800 and so I wanted to see how people would feel about 848 00:57:31,800 --> 00:57:38,400 clarifying in section b that we are talking about the secondary 849 00:57:38,607 --> 00:57:39,707 marketplace for the regulation of fees. 850 00:57:39,707 --> 00:57:44,470 chairperson mendelson: I would urge that that language be 851 00:57:44,470 --> 00:57:46,215 looked at between first and second reading. 852 00:57:46,215 --> 00:57:49,652 let's get this bill engrossed and folks can over the next two 853 00:57:49,652 --> 00:57:53,288 weeks take a look at what we have done and get feedback. 854 00:57:53,288 --> 00:57:59,195 but I am also thinking if it is 10% on fees, I mean, as I 855 00:57:59,195 --> 00:58:04,400 recall, you pay two dollars, maybe five dollars in fees per 856 00:58:04,400 --> 00:58:08,000 ticket. It is way less than 10%. 857 00:58:08,303 --> 00:58:09,872 so I am not even sure there is an issue here. 858 00:58:09,872 --> 00:58:13,809 councilmember pinto: well, the 10% cap is for the secondary 859 00:58:13,809 --> 00:58:18,900 market. My concern is that this language 860 00:58:19,348 --> 00:58:23,752 authorizes the mayor to regulate fees even in the primary market. 861 00:58:23,752 --> 00:58:26,752 no. I'm talking subsection b. 862 00:58:28,357 --> 00:58:31,627 it does not say anything about 20%. 863 00:58:31,627 --> 00:58:35,164 fees for service providing a marketplace for the issuance or 864 00:58:35,164 --> 00:58:38,234 sale of an initial ticket. So if another platform is 865 00:58:38,234 --> 00:58:45,434 selling a ticket for the 930 club and has some fees on it, 866 00:58:46,316 --> 00:58:48,584 our venues are currently receiving some of those fees, is 867 00:58:48,584 --> 00:58:50,530 my understanding. Chairperson mendelson: all 868 00:58:50,530 --> 00:58:53,189 right. Well, your time has expired. 869 00:58:53,189 --> 00:58:56,189 councilmember pinto: ok. So, great. 870 00:58:58,928 --> 00:59:00,729 so I look forward to working with you all between first and 871 00:59:00,729 --> 00:59:05,201 second reading to try to refocus on the secondary market. 872 00:59:05,201 --> 00:59:07,670 thank you. Chairperson mendelson: if there 873 00:59:07,670 --> 00:59:12,476 is no further discussion, the vote will be on the amendment 874 00:59:12,476 --> 00:59:14,143 that was circulated by councilmembers henderson and 875 00:59:14,143 --> 00:59:16,612 allen. On the amendment, all those in 876 00:59:16,612 --> 00:59:20,812 favor say aye. Are there any opposed? 877 00:59:21,217 --> 00:59:24,821 hearing none, the ayes have it unanimously. 878 00:59:24,821 --> 00:59:28,224 that was the amendment. Now we have the bill as amended 879 00:59:28,224 --> 00:59:32,328 before us. Is there any further discussion? 880 00:59:32,328 --> 00:59:37,100 on the bill as amended. So just I will repeat what I 881 00:59:37,100 --> 00:59:40,360 said a moment ago. This is first reading. 882 00:59:40,360 --> 00:59:44,808 and at the moment, it looks like second reading will be july 14. 883 00:59:44,808 --> 00:59:48,712 our practice is the general counsel will engross the bill to 884 00:59:48,712 --> 00:59:51,648 reflect the amendment and that will become available later this 885 00:59:51,648 --> 00:59:55,317 week. And so everybody can look at it 886 00:59:55,317 --> 01:00:00,560 and see if they are comfortable. On the bill as amended, all 887 01:00:00,560 --> 01:00:05,610 those in favor, say aye. Are there any opposed? 888 01:00:05,610 --> 01:00:09,261 hearing none, the ayes have it unanimously. 889 01:00:09,599 --> 01:00:13,199 we will turn to emergency measures. 890 01:00:16,206 --> 01:00:21,600 the first is 26-753, the holdover period emergency 891 01:00:22,812 --> 01:00:25,212 extension resolution. Councilmember allen. 892 01:00:26,750 --> 01:00:30,350 councilmember allen: thank you, mr. Chairman. 893 01:00:31,287 --> 01:00:34,887 ok. The public service commission of 894 01:00:36,492 --> 01:00:44,167 the district of columbia, psc is led by the mayor with advice to 895 01:00:44,167 --> 01:00:47,767 the council. The current commissioners, two 896 01:00:53,108 --> 01:00:57,380 are set to expire today. Section 2c provides that "no 897 01:00:57,380 --> 01:01:01,650 person shall serve in a hold of her capacity for longer than 180 898 01:01:01,650 --> 01:01:04,220 days after the expiration of the term to which he or she was 899 01:01:04,220 --> 01:01:07,820 appointed." officers appointed by the mayor 900 01:01:07,924 --> 01:01:10,659 with advice and consent to the consul given their current terms 901 01:01:10,659 --> 01:01:14,197 are set to expire today on june 30, there holdover period would 902 01:01:14,197 --> 01:01:18,997 end on december 2, 2026. Energy costs in the district 903 01:01:19,200 --> 01:01:25,602 have risen in the past year more than any other district. 904 01:01:28,110 --> 01:01:32,614 psc needs new leadership to navigate the affordably crisis 905 01:01:32,614 --> 01:01:36,419 and needs stability during the interim of administration 906 01:01:36,419 --> 01:01:39,122 changes to ensure a quorum can be met and operations continue. 907 01:01:39,122 --> 01:01:44,293 a new mayor will be inaugurated on january 2, 2027, and they 908 01:01:44,293 --> 01:01:48,898 should determine who is best to lead in the coming years. 909 01:01:48,898 --> 01:01:52,435 this emergency legislation would extend the holdover period from 910 01:01:52,435 --> 01:01:55,239 180 days to 270 days, if actively adding 90 additional 911 01:01:55,239 --> 01:01:59,439 days until march 27, 2027. Extending the holdover period 912 01:02:00,242 --> 01:02:01,377 will allow commissioners to serve while the next mayor 913 01:02:01,377 --> 01:02:05,415 determines the new nominees and the council can vote on those. 914 01:02:05,415 --> 01:02:08,651 thank you, mr. Chair. Chairperson mendelson: we have 915 01:02:08,651 --> 01:02:11,754 the declaration before us. Is there discussion on the 916 01:02:11,754 --> 01:02:15,354 declaration? The vote will be on. 917 01:02:16,459 --> 01:02:20,596 all those in favor, say aye. Are there any opposed? 918 01:02:20,596 --> 01:02:24,200 hearing none, the ayes have it unanimously. 919 01:02:24,200 --> 01:02:27,800 we have the underlying bill 26-715. 920 01:02:28,805 --> 01:02:35,405 is there a discussion? The vote will be on bill 26-715. 921 01:02:35,611 --> 01:02:39,615 all those in favor, say aye. Are there any opposed? 922 01:02:39,615 --> 01:02:42,819 hearing none, the ayes have it unanimously. 923 01:02:42,819 --> 01:02:48,219 the next measure is 26-751. Conference of policing and 924 01:02:48,491 --> 01:02:50,293 justice reform technical emergency declaration resolution 925 01:02:50,293 --> 01:02:52,362 2026. Councilmember allen: thank you, 926 01:02:52,362 --> 01:02:55,362 mr. Chair. On december 20, 2022, congress 927 01:02:57,766 --> 01:03:02,566 passed the act. Section 105 of the permanent law 928 01:03:03,239 --> 01:03:06,242 which expands the jurisdiction of the office of police 929 01:03:06,242 --> 01:03:09,445 complaints remains unfunded and has not yet taken effect. 930 01:03:09,445 --> 01:03:12,715 instead, substantially similar provisions have been maintained 931 01:03:12,715 --> 01:03:15,715 on emergency and temporary basis. 932 01:03:16,619 --> 01:03:21,591 amending the expanding supports for the act of 2022 which is 933 01:03:21,591 --> 01:03:26,391 d.c. Law 24-341, 14698. Section 4 of the leading 934 01:03:28,597 --> 01:03:33,936 education access for reentry and necessary success passed on the 935 01:03:33,936 --> 01:03:39,336 second reading on june 2, 2026. It clarifies the scope of 936 01:03:39,809 --> 01:03:42,770 reporting requirements on a permanent basis moving forward 937 01:03:42,770 --> 01:03:44,814 and has not yet been signed by the mayor. 938 01:03:44,814 --> 01:03:48,552 in response, the council passed the reform technical emergency 939 01:03:48,552 --> 01:03:52,152 act of 2025 which expired on january 28, 2026. 940 01:03:53,890 --> 01:03:57,893 council also passed the company hence of and justice reform 941 01:03:57,893 --> 01:04:00,564 technical temporary amendment act of 2025 which is set to 942 01:04:00,564 --> 01:04:04,433 expire on august 13, 2026, prior to the council's return from 943 01:04:04,433 --> 01:04:08,771 legislative recess. This new round is necessary to 944 01:04:08,771 --> 01:04:11,700 prevent a gap in the law between the expiration of the temporary 945 01:04:11,700 --> 01:04:16,407 legislation and section 105. It is necessary to clarify the 946 01:04:17,114 --> 01:04:22,514 scope of reporting requirements amended by the expanding reports 947 01:04:22,585 --> 01:04:24,320 . With that, I move. 948 01:04:24,320 --> 01:04:26,720 chairperson mendelson: thank you. 949 01:04:26,823 --> 01:04:28,191 we have the declaration before us. 950 01:04:28,191 --> 01:04:31,227 is there discussion? Councilmember henderson: mr. 951 01:04:31,227 --> 01:04:32,595 chairman. Chairperson mendelson: 952 01:04:32,595 --> 01:04:36,195 councilmember henderson. Councilmember henderson: we have 953 01:04:36,532 --> 01:04:42,339 been voting on this on an emergency and temporary basis 954 01:04:42,339 --> 01:04:45,141 fairly routinely at this point, so I am curious, what is the 955 01:04:45,141 --> 01:04:49,341 permanent plan here? Chairperson mendelson: there is 956 01:04:51,214 --> 01:04:52,615 a certain amount of finger-pointing going on. 957 01:04:52,615 --> 01:04:54,550 councilmember henderson: I am not pointing a finger. 958 01:04:54,550 --> 01:04:56,287 chairperson mendelson: I know you are not. 959 01:04:56,287 --> 01:04:57,756 councilmember henderson: I am just asking. 960 01:04:57,756 --> 01:05:02,360 chairperson mendelson: not sure I want to get into whose fingers 961 01:05:02,360 --> 01:05:04,429 are pointing at who but this apparently has to do with a 962 01:05:04,429 --> 01:05:08,500 provision that allegedly I had something to do with and that 963 01:05:08,500 --> 01:05:12,370 has not been funded, so I think there is some belief I am 964 01:05:12,370 --> 01:05:16,441 supposed to do something about this, which I am not fully 965 01:05:16,441 --> 01:05:18,843 understanding. At least going to the next 966 01:05:18,843 --> 01:05:21,790 round, maybe we will sort it out. 967 01:05:21,790 --> 01:05:25,500 councilmember henderson: so, we do it one more time. 968 01:05:25,500 --> 01:05:30,188 chairperson mendelson: I would prefer we do it many more times 969 01:05:30,188 --> 01:05:32,524 until the person I think is responsible figures out how to 970 01:05:32,524 --> 01:05:33,458 fund it. [laughter] 971 01:05:33,458 --> 01:05:35,927 councilmember henderson: how much is this particular 972 01:05:35,927 --> 01:05:38,830 provision? Chairperson mendelson: beats me. 973 01:05:38,830 --> 01:05:40,830 councilmember henderson: [laughter] 974 01:05:41,833 --> 01:05:44,102 so we don't know what we are fighting over? 975 01:05:44,102 --> 01:05:47,500 chairperson mendelson: I am not sure fighting is the right word. 976 01:05:47,500 --> 01:05:51,943 councilmember henderson: ok. I would just say for the record 977 01:05:51,943 --> 01:05:53,811 -- chairperson mendelson: a 978 01:05:53,811 --> 01:05:56,515 misunderstanding over it. Councilmember henderson: 979 01:05:56,515 --> 01:05:59,550 nonetheless, in terms of the personal gripes between who is 980 01:05:59,550 --> 01:06:03,756 responsible for what, etc., this is one of those situations where 981 01:06:03,756 --> 01:06:08,426 we have already been critiqued from the hill in terms of doing 982 01:06:08,426 --> 01:06:11,830 successive emergencies back to back that are permanent coming 983 01:06:11,830 --> 01:06:14,832 into play. That is what I am asking what 984 01:06:14,832 --> 01:06:19,170 the plan was if we are going to continue doing this on an 985 01:06:19,170 --> 01:06:23,308 emergency basis or someone, however, no finger-pointing, 986 01:06:23,308 --> 01:06:25,444 plans to actually fund the section so we no longer have to 987 01:06:25,444 --> 01:06:28,444 do this. Chairperson mendelson: noted. 988 01:06:32,117 --> 01:06:35,117 thank you. Councilmember henderson: ok. 989 01:06:38,523 --> 01:06:40,525 chairperson mendelson: councilmember felder. 990 01:06:40,525 --> 01:06:45,325 >> no, that was frumin. Councilmember frumin: thank you 991 01:06:48,399 --> 01:06:49,267 very much. People get confused all the 992 01:06:49,267 --> 01:06:51,267 time. [laughter] 993 01:06:52,370 --> 01:06:56,808 I just want to echo the comment councilmember henderson made. 994 01:06:56,808 --> 01:07:00,679 the mayor talks about this is the sixth time we have done this 995 01:07:00,679 --> 01:07:03,148 on emergency basis. I don't understand why that 996 01:07:03,148 --> 01:07:05,250 would be. I don't want to do a seventh 997 01:07:05,250 --> 01:07:08,250 time. I don't get it. 998 01:07:08,920 --> 01:07:12,356 so hopefully we can figure this out and not have to do it a 999 01:07:12,356 --> 01:07:17,156 second time. We can't rely on emergencies in 1000 01:07:17,295 --> 01:07:20,498 this kind of way. We should not rely on 1001 01:07:20,498 --> 01:07:25,437 emergencies in this kind of way. Let's sort it out. 1002 01:07:25,437 --> 01:07:29,637 chairperson mendelson: further discussion on the declaration? 1003 01:07:30,410 --> 01:07:35,413 on the declaration, 26-751, all those in favor, say aye. 1004 01:07:35,413 --> 01:07:39,784 are there any opposed? Hearing none, the ayes have it 1005 01:07:39,784 --> 01:07:42,784 unanimously. On the underlying bill, 1006 01:07:44,255 --> 01:07:47,255 councilmember allen. Councilmember allen: enthusiasm, 1007 01:07:47,525 --> 01:07:48,993 mr. Chair. Chairperson mendelson: 1008 01:07:48,993 --> 01:07:52,831 discussion? The vote will be on 26-712. 1009 01:07:52,831 --> 01:07:57,635 all those in favor, say aye. Are there any opposed? 1010 01:07:57,635 --> 01:08:01,835 hearing none, the ayes have it unanimously. 1011 01:08:02,741 --> 01:08:06,878 the next measure is the safety extension emergency declaration 1012 01:08:06,878 --> 01:08:08,878 resolution 2026. Councilmember henderson. 1013 01:08:09,130 --> 01:08:12,613 councilmember henderson: thank you, mr. Chairman. 1014 01:08:13,318 --> 01:08:16,287 speaking of many emergencies, this measure would once again 1015 01:08:16,287 --> 01:08:19,825 extend the emergency legislation that has been effect since 1016 01:08:19,825 --> 01:08:22,627 december 2024. That permits a retail 1017 01:08:22,627 --> 01:08:25,963 establishment with a valid on premises class c or class d 1018 01:08:25,963 --> 01:08:30,568 retailer license or restaurant location that operates 24 hours 1019 01:08:30,568 --> 01:08:35,239 a day or operates at 3:00 a.m. At least two days a week to 1020 01:08:35,239 --> 01:08:36,574 refuse cash as a form of payment. 1021 01:08:36,574 --> 01:08:38,976 in order to comply with this exemption, the establishment 1022 01:08:38,976 --> 01:08:44,976 must display written notice to the public that the cash 1023 01:08:45,716 --> 01:08:48,253 payments are not accepted on the door of the establishment or on 1024 01:08:48,253 --> 01:08:52,453 its menu. A permanent measure is under 1025 01:08:52,490 --> 01:08:54,992 consideration in the committee on public works and operations. 1026 01:08:54,992 --> 01:08:58,395 it had a hearing on june 9, 2025. 1027 01:08:58,395 --> 01:09:05,736 while I hope the permanent would have been passed by now, it will 1028 01:09:05,736 --> 01:09:11,209 not in time as the current temporary would expire while we 1029 01:09:11,209 --> 01:09:14,813 are on recess, so that is why I am moving this today. 1030 01:09:14,813 --> 01:09:19,130 so moved, mr. Chairman. Chairperson mendelson: thank 1031 01:09:19,617 --> 01:09:20,618 you. Discussion? 1032 01:09:20,618 --> 01:09:24,489 councilmember henderson, you said this was a successive 1033 01:09:24,489 --> 01:09:27,250 emergency? Councilmember henderson: not by 1034 01:09:27,250 --> 01:09:31,225 choice, but yes. Chairperson mendelson: I will 1035 01:09:31,563 --> 01:09:36,167 just note for the record you and I talked about this I think a 1036 01:09:36,167 --> 01:09:41,567 couple weeks ago. I have been voting against this 1037 01:09:41,840 --> 01:09:44,609 consistently so I will be voting against it today. 1038 01:09:44,609 --> 01:09:46,211 it has been approved consistently. 1039 01:09:46,211 --> 01:09:51,110 is there further discussion? On the declaration, 26-750, 1040 01:09:54,520 --> 01:09:57,822 all those in favor, say aye. Are there any opposed? 1041 01:09:57,822 --> 01:10:03,795 please record me as voting no. The ayes have it. 1042 01:10:03,795 --> 01:10:06,195 on 26-710, councilmember henderson. 1043 01:10:08,399 --> 01:10:09,734 councilmember henderson: so moved. 1044 01:10:09,734 --> 01:10:11,734 chairperson mendelson: discussion? 1045 01:10:12,470 --> 01:10:16,670 on the bill -- >> can I speak? 1046 01:10:27,351 --> 01:10:29,754 I can withdraw. Chairperson mendelson: 1047 01:10:29,754 --> 01:10:33,491 councilmember bonds. Councilmember bonds: I move to 1048 01:10:33,491 --> 01:10:36,494 withdraw and because the measure, the permanent measure 1049 01:10:36,494 --> 01:10:41,100 is potentially coming. And the maker of this temporary 1050 01:10:41,100 --> 01:10:45,900 bill determined that my amendment was not friendly. 1051 01:10:46,504 --> 01:10:49,573 so if it is not friendly, I will wait for the permanent measure. 1052 01:10:49,573 --> 01:10:54,312 chairperson mendelson: ok. If there is no further 1053 01:10:54,312 --> 01:10:57,848 discussion, the vote will be on 26-710. 1054 01:10:57,848 --> 01:11:03,500 all of those in favor, say aye. Are there any opposed? 1055 01:11:03,500 --> 01:11:09,500 please record me as voting no. The ayes have it. 1056 01:11:12,815 --> 01:11:18,815 we have temporary bills. If there is no objection, we 1057 01:11:19,890 --> 01:11:21,240 will move the first two in block. 1058 01:11:21,240 --> 01:11:25,824 that is bill 26-726. , perhaps of policing and 1059 01:11:31,167 --> 01:11:34,167 justice reform temporary act 2026, 26-713. 1060 01:11:35,438 --> 01:11:39,275 hearing no objection, they are before us in blocked. 1061 01:11:39,275 --> 01:11:42,712 I will say so moved. Any discussion on those two 1062 01:11:42,712 --> 01:11:44,714 temporaries? All those in favor, say aye. 1063 01:11:44,714 --> 01:11:50,114 are there any opposed? The ayes have it unanimously. 1064 01:11:50,486 --> 01:11:53,486 26-711, entertainment establishments safety extension. 1065 01:11:56,625 --> 01:11:59,250 councilmember henderson. So moved? 1066 01:12:00,196 --> 01:12:01,797 councilmember henderson: so moved. 1067 01:12:01,797 --> 01:12:05,234 chairperson mendelson: discussion on this bill? 1068 01:12:05,234 --> 01:12:11,834 all those in favor say aye. ,almost did not make it. 1069 01:12:14,100 --> 01:12:18,480 are there any opposed? Please record me as voting no. 1070 01:12:18,480 --> 01:12:23,280 the ayes have it. The next legislative meeting 1071 01:12:24,860 --> 01:12:27,689 will be an additional meeting on july 14. 1072 01:12:27,689 --> 01:12:30,559 the agenda says 12:00. That time may actually be 1073 01:12:30,559 --> 01:12:33,559 earlier. We are thinking about 10:00. 1074 01:12:34,430 --> 01:12:38,630 yes on the 14th. Oh, I'm sorry. 1075 01:12:39,101 --> 01:12:42,701 the seventh. Let me start over. 1076 01:12:44,840 --> 01:12:48,310 the next legislative meeting on the agenda is july 14. 1077 01:12:48,310 --> 01:12:51,580 it is an additional meeting scheduled to start at noon. 1078 01:12:51,580 --> 01:12:55,717 they will in fact be a legislative meeting on july 7 1079 01:12:55,717 --> 01:12:58,754 where we are going to take up the budget support act. 1080 01:12:58,754 --> 01:13:02,354 and that will probably start at 10:00. 1081 01:13:02,858 --> 01:13:07,930 there being no further business, the time is 2:42 in the 1082 01:13:07,930 --> 01:13:11,530 afternoon, and this meeting is adjourned. 1083 01:13:13,690 --> 01:13:15,690 ?