[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[0:17] Good afternoon, everybody. Today's meeting we have a presentation from the folks at the
[0:37] was made with some modifications and some revisions, and I would say at the end of that meeting the board said proceed with what you're going to do.
[0:47] One of the elements of that was what it looked like.
[0:53] And to that end, I believe the applicant has provided two versions, I guess, for lack of a better word of what it would look like.
[1:02] And I was looking for some board input as to the architecturals.
[1:08] In addition, he, the applicant, has submitted a stipulation,
[1:13] which is intended to incorporate the various elements of this project
[1:19] into a court order to settle the litigation.
[1:23] I think I spoke to Mr. Murphy.
[1:27] There are some concerns about the stipulation
[1:30] from board members need some revisions, so the board is not going to be approving any stipulation
[1:35] today.
[1:37] And I have the various comments from board members that I will share with him, but I think
[1:41] we should go over the architectures and if you have any other planners that, the same plan,
[1:47] maybe you can bring it up in a quick public about what that is, what's all about.
[1:52] And also, show the renderings and let's get a perspective from the renderings as to what
[1:56] The Board and the public feels as appropriate make sense.
[2:02] Sure.
[2:05] Good afternoon.
[2:06] We were last year, four months ago.
[2:07] We were here on November 15th.
[2:09] Four months ago?
[2:10] Time flies.
[2:11] November 15th.
[2:14] And at that time, we did present an updated plan that further reduced the impervious to a 40% limit and reduced the overall square footage.
[2:27] Additionally, down to plus or minus 52,000 square feet, it's that plan that is on the
[2:34] easel to my right and which Scott prepared and we reviewed at length the last time.
[2:41] We had gone through different considerations on impervious reducing the bike path eliminating
[2:47] from calculation, the one way access in the access to the well, et cetera, but so that
[2:54] hasn't changed, so we're happy to go over that again if you like. However, since then,
[2:59] just right, we did exchange comments on a stipulation, Jeff provided me some specific comments
[3:06] earlier today, all of which I'm going through with our client. We had no issue with the ones
[3:12] that Jeff raised previously.
[3:14] There's additional comments from board members though that I'll share with you tomorrow.
[3:17] Okay. Well, that's fine. But at least as far as the ones you've shared with me so far, I think we're good.
[3:23] Also with us today is David Pilotnik, who is the architect that has done some elevations.
[3:30] We did some earlier, we got some feedback about those, and David in response has prepared
[3:37] an alternate, which, again, we've circulated in small form, but David can review them in
[3:43] the larger elevations that he also has here as well.
[3:46] So, he'd like I'll introduce David, and he can go through that for you.
[3:49] Welcome.
[3:52] My name is David Pullout, and I come with PCS Architects on the Project Architects.
[4:00] We need to find a way that the folks in the audience can take a look at these, because I...
[4:04] Aren't they the same?
[4:05] No, they're different.
[4:06] Actually, they're different.
[4:07] They're different.
[4:08] They're different.
[4:08] They're different.
[4:10] They're different.
[4:10] I don't know the public.
[4:15] I thought you'd hold up and haven't picked a look at, and that's version one.
[4:18] sort of do the like they do with boxing matches, you know the first round
[4:30] I'll tell you a little bit about the building, the building is going to be constructed of wood frame
[4:36] and for the exterior materials we'll have
[4:40] are you going to be mites?
[5:07] So, as I have saying, the buildings are constructed of wood frame, and they have wood
[5:14] trusses, basically the exterior walls would be constructed of wood.
[5:19] The exterior material would be on the end path you can see on the end.
[5:24] and use these two renderers to pretty similar,
[5:27] but that the ends and the base will have so in the air.
[5:33] And the group would be an actual chain up,
[5:35] and there would be some use of some metal groups
[5:37] in some of the pages you can see
[5:39] before we're here to have a metal group.
[5:41] There also we'd be using some side up,
[5:44] there's a sign-dance, and there'll be some wood trends
[5:47] on vertical side, and you can see we made use
[5:50] of the couple on the buildings.
[5:52] like what I do is like going to love a work here just to show you some materials that we
[5:58] used that we would be thinking about, the representative materials that we would be using.
[6:05] And these are the colors or not. That's certainly the colors that we would be using
[6:09] but we would try to stay within Earth and then the colors I get.
[6:13] Well, if you could, so the residents, if you could just use their water.
[6:19] they're they're they're oriented you're going to have to get to a mic to go to a
[6:27] mic or saw them please because most of the people you know kind of know where
[6:35] some of these buildings are but I believe this is coming from 263 this is the
[6:40] building that's going to be next to where the lamp factory is and that is going to
[6:46] the CVS, if that's how I take it. I'm going to be talking to you right here. It would be
[6:52] yeah it would be helpful for people to kind of know where those buildings are going to be situated
[6:56] on the property. I'm going to go to use a lot of the better behind or something here.
[7:10] Well that's what I'm just talking to you for here. You see that building, you see that building
[7:14] on the background. The difference between the two random things is that one shows
[7:27] I have to admit that I said to Mr. Murphy, when I first saw that rendering, it seemed like a awful
[7:35] expanse of roof line, straight after each other, and I said, maybe you can do something that
[7:41] provide a little more colonial and break up with a roof.
[7:43] So if it's ugly, then it's my fault, but that maybe what was produced as a result of those
[7:48] comments.
[7:49] It looks great, like the dormers, the dormers, yes, they look like they belong on a trackhouse and
[7:56] Northeast Philly.
[8:00] They don't look like real dormers to me.
[8:01] They look like they're like something from the 70s.
[8:03] No offense.
[8:05] No offense.
[8:05] You know what I'm saying?
[8:06] They're not like real dormers.
[8:09] Well, you know, they could be back when they could be made and look like, you know, they're
[8:13] back that space up there and that's not a problem to do things like that.
[8:17] I guess the first question is,
[8:20] it's elevated.
[8:23] It's not, it's not.
[8:26] You know what I'm saying?
[8:27] So the question I guess is, do you prefer some
[8:29] break-up of the roof line or does the board
[8:32] in the public prefer that straight roof line that goes
[8:34] all the way back in the man's system?
[8:38] Some direction would be appropriate.
[8:41] I think the dormer is a nice idea.
[8:44] I think they look like they belong there.
[8:45] I don't know. I just just putting them on there to break the roof line doesn't make sense to me.
[8:50] Yeah. I mean, I noticed the roof line originally, but after you say it, Jeff, now it does look like I think something to break it up, doesn't it?
[9:03] No offense to you. They're very nice renderers. They're very nice renderers.
[9:11] And maybe the dormers have to see more that for that to that window.
[9:17] Maybe six over six or something else that gives a little more of a, as opposed just a piece of glass and sort of squatted down like you're in an old polka mill property or something.
[9:28] You know, like the northeastern.
[9:30] Same difference.
[9:39] All right, so everyone's kind of okay with the rendering, just a question, so are you suggesting that all the buildings would have the same look and feel?
[9:50] Yes, the CVS and everything was a CVS would be further over, right, so that will look the same.
[9:55] every one of them will have that okay and I guess the board should have some input and
[10:05] what the preferences of the stone work and the and the roof material. So if I think you
[10:11] had a board somewhere with that in it. This is a board of some representatives in the material. It's
[10:15] really doesn't really reflect the colors, but the stone patterns, you know, with the finish of the
[10:22] that would be routine goals from the vertical in the horizontal side of the side that would be using.
[10:30] The need for the materials that would be on the buildings.
[10:34] Is the rendering to pick any of those that are in your board, or they just do not?
[10:38] I'm doing that now.
[10:39] It's quite me as well.
[10:40] I mean, here's this would be the sum.
[10:43] It would be the value of that grouping that we talked about.
[10:46] This would be the actual chain goal.
[10:48] Well, it's hard to get it signed in with the stock out and, you know, we had a little
[10:54] donor back up here, which would have some size in there.
[11:00] So yeah.
[11:01] The buzz of the board, whether you want to weigh in on the materials or not, I mean, it's really
[11:04] up to you folks.
[11:08] You know, tonight, as we go forward, I think we should have something like that.
[11:13] I think you do.
[11:14] You're the architects and you're the designer.
[11:16] You pick your best thing, what you think is most appropriate and we'll look at the
[11:20] We have an injection more than you know, but it seems like you have pretty good taste
[11:24] Yeah, maybe you can just do what you do the final mix of options on the same
[11:50] The way it looks is going to be fine, and we'll be tweaking as we go, but I think the general look is good.
[11:58] Anybody out there want to weigh in on this now?
[12:00] Seeing nobody's here.
[12:03] Mr. Murphy, I just wanted to prime the get out.
[12:06] I'm not going to be wanting to approach any stipulation until most of the development work is done.
[12:12] I think there are just too many open-ended issues in here,
[12:16] If this and that, and then we shall do this sort of thing, we shall do that thing.
[12:22] I think that there's no off-site impact fees.
[12:24] I think it's a little too early, and I still don't know what happened to all the trees.
[12:29] One of the comments I said to Mr. Murphy was, we have an old agreement that we have to
[12:37] deal with.
[12:39] But there was some evidence to restore some trees and whatever.
[12:43] I think we need that.
[12:44] I look forward looking for more than just that to be attached to this part.
[12:48] Well, as I said, Jeff and I reviewed a handful of things, including this thing, for
[12:52] of you mentioned, and we're happy to include those in a revised draft of the stipulation.
[12:57] And we spoke about the outside impact fee, needing to include the terms and additions
[13:02] of the prior settlement with which we were not in Bob, but that involves the tree replacement
[13:06] issue.
[13:06] Who happy to do that?
[13:07] No, okay.
[13:08] Well, fine.
[13:10] We know that this isn't going to be executed, well, some of the British members.
[13:15] Correct.
[13:15] And soon as Jeff, if there's other issues of which I'm on a wear, I'll do it with those things.
[13:19] Board says fine and we air it publicly will make the boards, I think it's expressed their opinion into plan and was satisfactory.
[13:28] Right.
[13:28] Matter of funding up the loose ends and getting some things taken there of and incorporating architectures and all the things that are part of that process.
[13:37] But if you indicate, for example, number two, minor shifting of a location, I don't know what that is.
[13:45] We have, we've got the word, Shaolin here within 30 business days, and that always makes me nervous.
[13:52] That's the challenge of Shaolin doing something within a time term.
[13:57] We Shaolin through the final land development, if it's substantially complies with all aspects of this distillation, that also makes me nervous.
[14:04] I think there's a little too much on us to be doing here.
[14:07] We should use our best efforts to improve the pollining modules.
[14:11] And then that we don't have any way of looking at off-site impact fees.
[14:16] It's necessary.
[14:17] I think that's something I'm not willing to give up at this point.
[14:20] And we're not asking you to.
[14:22] Well, I know it's in here.
[14:24] No.
[14:24] Well, Jeff and I spoke today.
[14:26] Okay.
[14:27] Yesterday.
[14:28] I didn't get a chance to tell on my.
[14:30] And then 15 is a third party time state.
[14:35] And in litigation, I don't know at this point whether I hopefully know what it would do
[14:39] that.
[14:40] But we really don't have any control of the third party in your interventions.
[14:46] And whether we would have to help you defend those I'm not sure I'm willing to go into that.
[14:51] I'm always stipulation discipline.
[14:53] So those are the general and my things.
[14:55] And I have Mr. Sniders that I'll share with you in Mr. Collellis and other more members so
[15:00] Question for the file I can retrieve the issue we should get, flush it out.
[15:07] If I understand everything that maybe is stretched but can we delay the stipulated agreement
[15:17] like barbers saying, so you get a little finer detail relying on the good faith of the board
[15:23] that we're, you know, amenable to going along and then it will flush out some of these
[15:29] if and then's that is that doable well and billbanners here representing Mr. Grasso as
[15:38] well as he was last time what I would say to that is that the prospect of now re-engineering
[15:43] another plan without having the comfort level of a document that we're all going to abide by
[15:51] unsure will make Mr. Grasso uncomfortable use important work if we're all operating in good faith
[15:58] that we can move ahead on this or whatever additional comments that I hear from Jeff tomorrow
[16:03] of the next day.
[16:04] And maybe we can talk about that.
[16:05] But the whole point of doing this was to try to give everyone the comfort that you're going
[16:09] to get what we all intend to provide to you, which is that plan plus whatever details and
[16:14] everything else we have to spell out.
[16:17] So I guess that is a question, Rick, that we probably-
[16:19] What are things where we all have to-
[16:21] They don't want to spend a whole lot of money on engineering, which would be significant if they
[16:24] don't feel that there's a-
[16:26] I like it. He has a tunnel and that somebody comes back and says, no, I want something else.
[16:31] So it's one of those things that most of our comments are not about architectural engineering things.
[16:36] It is about, you know, fundamental.
[16:39] Yeah. I mean, it's not about the dude with anything that's stormwater, but they've got to apply with the ordinance.
[16:43] We're going to think. We know that. Yeah.
[16:45] So if they are the same character of the comments that I've already heard from Jeff.
[16:50] I don't think that's going to be a stomach block.
[16:53] We just want you to know that there's some uncertainty because and what I make sure that
[16:57] this is precise is can be that your commitments are reduced to writing and that the plan
[17:03] is consistent with what's been presented.
[17:05] And we support all those.
[17:07] I'm good with all those.
[17:08] So I feel pretty confident that that's the case that we're going to be able to come up with something
[17:11] that gives everybody enough comfort to move ahead because we want to move ahead.
[17:16] We're anxious to move ahead.
[17:17] Can we now send any questions or comments from the board? Any questions or comments from the folks here?
[17:23] Neighbors.
[17:24] Okay. Do you have enough direction? Sort of?
[17:29] I guess.
[17:30] Hopefully.
[17:31] I hope I'm actually here to talk to Jeff and see if there's any other issues of which we are unaware of.
[17:48] Okay, any other visitors or public comments.
[17:56] Next meeting of us board is Tuesday, March 15th at 7pm.
[18:01] Daylight savings times everybody is March 13th.
[18:04] You have to set your clocks ahead.
[18:06] You lose an hour.
[18:07] That's Sunday morning.
[18:09] Washington D.C. Cherry Blossom Trip is April 2nd, it's $50,000 a person. You can sign up at
[18:16] dosairect.com. Red Cross Spring Blood Drive is Monday, April 11th, 227, the activity center.
[18:23] You can sign up at RedCrossBlood.org.
[18:28] The dosairect community garden survey is available on our website. We're thinking about doing
[18:33] a community garden and we want to make sure everyone has an opportunity to wait in on it.
[18:37] It would be down in the neighborhood of the Lower Stigland Parkway.
[18:42] There's an area of tank or parcel that we acquired in open space.
[18:46] We're looking at, perhaps, in any garden, but we want to do unless there's an interesting, you know, folks participating.
[18:53] And then, movie and ski tickets are available, contact the admin offices for the prices and what is in the available.
[18:59] Next slide, when the agenda is approval of the minutes from December 16, 2016, regular meeting of the board.
[19:09] Okay. Any questions, comments, corrections? All in favour?
[19:13] Aye. Aye. One abstent? One abstent? You were on our zone.
[19:18] So, they did watch the meeting. I like the record to show.
[19:21] I did watch the meeting.
[19:23] And the minutes? The minutes were.
[19:25] Reflected, what I saw on television.
[19:29] So, is it anything?
[19:30] I'd let report at this moment.
[19:36] And then the touch of editor, I have a few things. First, I have a memo on training for the APM conference for my self-enotum to attend and then for myself to attend the P-Sats conference with the board.
[19:49] I see that you're going to try and learn something about drones with special, you know, potential ordinances, drafts.
[19:55] It's going to probably come on this kind of conference for us, okay, is there a motion to approve the request for training?
[20:02] So move, second.
[20:04] All in favor.
[20:05] All right.
[20:05] All right.
[20:06] All right.
[20:07] Thank you.
[20:09] Setting the work budget session.
[20:11] Thank you.
[20:12] Yes.
[20:13] The way the means to meeting that and I want to do that spring budget work session like we did last year.
[20:20] And pretty sure we have a little discussion before the meeting that the date starts is April
[20:24] 12, which believes that Tuesday, not Thursday, and then Tuesday June 14th, and it probably
[20:33] will.
[20:34] Well, this is Tuesday.
[20:35] And Thursday, June 14th or four, is everyone okay with those two days waiting to make
[20:39] them or not?
[20:40] I'm okay.
[20:41] I just want to comment about the 12th, because Sean, I mean, he's going to become into the
[20:44] ways of means, parking, wreck, and EAC, which is like six, seven straight hours.
[20:50] So?
[20:51] I'm just bringing it up.
[20:53] Have a problem with that, Sean?
[20:54] I appreciate it. If there's any compassion on the board, you could pack me like a lunch or meal.
[21:02] That's four o'clock. Yeah, I don't be a person and I'll be a long time.
[21:06] Yeah, well, not getting into this.
[21:10] Okay, but that's seriously. It's a long day for you.
[21:13] It's a long day for you.
[21:16] Both states are good? Yes.
[21:19] We'll let the ways we need to meet you now.
[21:21] We'll get that every kind of.
[21:23] June 14th at 4.
[21:24] June 14th.
[21:25] All right.
[21:25] Next item is this snow.
[21:30] Show no.
[21:31] Fair.
[21:31] Show no.
[21:32] Yes.
[21:33] The board will recall that we had advertised through the piece
[21:36] That's magazine twice for the sale of the show will be all.
[21:40] We actually had the burrow of Sair, which is on the New York border.
[21:45] Come down.
[21:45] Look at it.
[21:46] Mr. Snyder had to be here the day that they were here, so he got to meet them.
[21:53] They absolutely loved the show reveal and their board is their council, excuse me, their borough council.
[21:58] There's a February 25th approved the purchase of the show reveal for $10,000, which was our minimum fit on that.
[22:07] And our recommendation would be for us to go ahead and sell it to the borough of Sayer.
[22:13] have Mr. Garton prepared the appropriate documentation.
[22:16] This is blind to execute it and when it's prepared and then they'll come down and pick it up
[22:22] and we will make sure when they come will transfer the tags and everything like that while they're here.
[22:28] I did draft it and I will be sending it out to all the board members tomorrow for your
[22:43] I'm sorry you've heard the sound right you'll prove offering it for sale, but not to sale to say or
[22:48] I make a motion we approve the sale to say a second then. Okay, all in favor. All right. All right, I'm sorry. Thank you
[22:54] I'm coming to the supervisor Sean
[22:57] No, I've had no
[22:58] Meetings except for the Decado Conference and Saturday. So I'll defer thank you. No comment. Okay. Okay. I get the accumulator time. I
[23:09] That's just that three things.
[23:11] At the pension meeting, it was brought up about with our two experts, Deborah and Jim Kennedy,
[23:23] that our MMO is not going to basically change much.
[23:26] It's going to be much more than $300,000, that's an example.
[23:29] So the recommendation was if our cash flow permitted it to put in $50,000 now because they can do, in most cases, better with the $50,000, then we can do in a 1% CD where it is now.
[23:51] So their recommendation was to see if the cash flow could advance or not advance but pay in advance $50,000.
[23:59] And the pension board unanimously approved that.
[24:03] So I'm bringing it here saying if the consensus is to have the Stephanie and Ken Snyder and Ken Wallace or whoever,
[24:11] to take a look at that and see if the cash flow can support sending in extra amount of dollars.
[24:18] Well, we have a ways of means meeting, I don't know the April 12th, is that should we have a
[24:24] fall budget reported at that time, where's it too long to wait?
[24:28] We could analyze it between now and then and have it reported then and you could
[24:32] take an action or be an advertised meeting if we need to, because we don't have to
[24:36] them a moment until such a journey.
[24:39] Is that work?
[24:40] Yeah, and I wouldn't think we'd take very long to.
[24:41] I agree.
[24:42] Okay, my second thing is I'm a reasonably intelligent person. I'll start with that and I've read this EMS letter from Chuck a few times and I honestly don't quite understand it
[24:57] And then the next step is he's looking for a support. So I don't know what I don't know what
[25:04] What you know the balancing
[25:07] A billing by anybody
[25:09] I thought it was a confusing request to Chuck Fussler as they had the CVM meal and he's looking for something, make up money.
[25:21] The loss there, I'm not quite sure what it is, you know.
[25:24] We can ask for more content, we can ask for content.
[25:26] The board wants to help them, that's fine.
[25:29] I just don't understand.
[25:31] Yeah, I think he's looking for support.
[25:32] There's legislation that's pending as well.
[25:34] And then this balance billing thing, which is, I guess,
[25:37] then the Pennsylvania insurance commission is saying
[25:41] that they don't, they won't be able to balance bill
[25:43] on an ambulance ride.
[25:45] So typically, if they're not certain portion isn't covered
[25:49] if it's 600 and they only get 300,
[25:52] they want to balance bill the other 300 to the insured.
[25:56] I think he's just asking for the work.
[25:58] Not necessarily our financial skills work.
[26:01] Yeah, that's how we do that.
[26:01] No, that's how I read it.
[26:02] Yeah, no no, no.
[26:03] You don't have to share a ready to?
[26:04] Does he want to suspend, what do you want us to do?
[26:07] Right.
[26:07] What kind of support?
[26:08] Yeah, exactly.
[26:08] What for?
[26:10] Third thing is, as I mentioned, I watched him eat, and I think, Shawn mentioned that the
[26:15] parking wreck is looking to do some additions and maybe I'll say, cosmetics, that's probably
[26:20] not a fair thing.
[26:21] For the amphitheatre, I would like to see before I get to that step, where were
[26:28] at with the amphitheatre?
[26:31] What's what's what's profit in loss? What's our sheet? What we have planned for this year?
[26:36] I mean, I speak people give us donations and we still have a fiduciary responsibility to spend those donations properly and I can't
[26:45] Vote for that unless you get some clarity on
[26:49] How many events? How they're doing is it going to be you mean repitalized me, right?
[26:53] I'm not voting on anything. I'm asking for Sean to ask to regard that you go ask me
[26:57] Yeah, I think that was to mention that there was still a sponsorship opportunity that they
[27:04] are available.
[27:05] But going forward, I know Parkal Red currently is working on both of the list, a punch list,
[27:12] prioritizing those, you know, what still, but they still want to accomplish, you know, improvements
[27:16] and such on the community as well as a schedule for the concert series.
[27:22] So they're looking at both sides, habits and credits, you know, what they still want to do
[27:25] and other fundraising opportunities as well.
[27:30] And the schedule, so I think we can get a report from the next park and wreck what they have planned for instance.
[27:37] They've expanded that series such a concert.
[27:39] All right, and they've added some additional events or shows and concerts.
[27:44] And there's still some others that they're talking about now.
[27:47] Although the window is closing for sponsors to get on like on the printed material and everything.
[27:52] You know, because they have to go to print soon. There's still that's still expanding the venues for the rest of the year
[27:58] So we can try to get that from the night. I mean, I'm not if you could do if you want to bring a great if Karen wants to stop by for five minutes
[28:04] That's great. I just bring it to the meeting on the in the ways of being unable for June
[28:09] We have it already. I'm good whenever
[28:12] Yeah, you know me here. There's time frames for some kind of report if they're ready. I mean, especially if they want to do some work during the summer
[28:23] You're suggesting that at the April 12th meeting, that was a means committee meeting or the other was a means committee.
[28:31] The April 12th or the June 14th.
[28:33] Okay.
[28:33] Whenever they're ready for it.
[28:35] Yes, I'm ready for it.
[28:36] It's fine.
[28:38] Thank you.
[28:38] That's all I have.
[28:39] Thank you.
[28:41] Nothing for this one.
[28:42] Thank you.
[28:43] All right.
[28:43] Moving on to the long maintenance did for 2016.
[28:47] You memo from Dick John.
[28:50] Any questions?
[28:52] The recommendation is to prove one-year-long maintenance extension.
[28:58] Now, rating increase with green landscape contractors for $114,520.
[29:06] I'll make that motion.
[29:07] I'll second questions on favor.
[29:10] I can tap grant.
[29:14] Yes.
[29:15] This is a form of policy that we need to approve resolution
[29:20] that will designate three people from the township that will review the inspection and construction management from.
[29:29] This is all part of the tap grant will be paid for by the 1 million point two tap grant.
[29:34] But it is policy that has to be put into our electronic data management program with PENDA.
[29:41] And this will be working with DVRPC, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission,
[29:46] and setting this up and selecting a construction management engineering company to oversee that project.
[29:53] And so that is what the resolution sets for three of those people being the bidding system.
[30:00] First of all, we'll be done through the RFP system. We'll be done through the PEN.com ECMS program, the electronic management,
[30:07] and then they'll be selected in all of the paid forth through the tap grant.
[30:12] Sir, may you stand there, request?
[30:15] Sir, may you do for the resolution?
[30:17] Why do you identify who are the three people just so that?
[30:19] Definitely, may some would be serving as from the township manager,
[30:22] does not need to take John, his director of operations, and then Tom Kalsos, the White and
[30:27] High Community Voluntary.
[30:30] I'll make that motion a second.
[30:32] All in favour?
[30:33] All in favour?
[30:33] All in favour?
[30:36] Egel's Capacamation for Caldha, David Roberts.
[30:39] 2nd number 71, is your motion to approve the Proclamation?
[30:43] So moved.
[30:45] All in favour?
[30:46] Kiles Court of Honor is April 10, 2016.
[30:50] He did the ADA accessible pedestrian bridge at Peace Valley Park.
[30:56] So, when you walk over, I think I'll have an Eagle Scout project.
[31:01] I wonder if I can.
[31:02] All right.
[31:03] Our next item on the agenda is our announcements.
[31:06] We are done.
[31:08] Next being of this board is February 15th at 7 p.m.
[31:11] By 2 p.m. March 15th at 7 p.m.
[31:13] Daylight savings time is March 13th.
[31:16] Set your clock ahead of one hour.
[31:18] Washington D.C. Cherry Blossom trip is April 2nd, $50 a person, you sign up at DawesTimeRect.com,
[31:27] Red Cross Spring Blood Drive, April 11th, 2 to 7 at the Activities Center, and you sign up
[31:32] for that at RedCrossBlood.org.
[31:35] The Community Township and DawesTimeCommunity Garden Survey, please go to DawesTimePay.org, take
[31:42] a moment to do the survey, would like to get your input.
[31:45] And movie and ski tickets are available by contacting the administrative offices for prices and availability.
[31:52] Is there any other business?
[31:54] No.
[31:55] Here you know, we are Jones.
[31:56] Thank you very much.
[31:56] There are things to sign.
[31:58] To see you all.